alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3538. Rescheduling and refinancing of Federal loans

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to refinance any note or other obligation which is held by him in connection with any loan made by the Department of Housing and Urban Development or its predecessor in interest, or which is included within the revolving fund for liquidating programs established by the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1955 [12 U.S.C. 1701g–5], where he finds such refinancing necessary because of the loss, destruction, or damage (as a result of a major disaster) to property or facilities securing such obligations. The Secretary may authorize a suspension in the payment of principal and interest charges on, and an additional extension in the maturity of, any such loan for a period not to exceed five years if he determines that such action is necessary to avoid severe financial hardship.

(Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §236(b), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1754.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1955, referred to in text, is act June 24, 1954, ch. 359, 68 Stat. 272. Provisions of the act which established the revolving fund for liquidating programs are classified to section 1701g–5 of Title 12, Banks and Banking. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 4455(b) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 31, 1970, see section 304 of Pub. L. 91–606, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 165 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
/ 

MEMmM 

February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's application to provide 

new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to 

Tol<yo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in reaching a 

landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and Los Angeles to 

Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's financial and commerce 

centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, have 

underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed to 

New York and Los Angles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education 

- providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these proposed 

new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to make the 

JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefo/:©;^! strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy to 

Har^a ! 

/ 

jincereh^, 

/(// ^ 

/\A. K _ t )y^/V ^•'•^- Intemational Tours (NY), Inc. 

Ourrfou^O
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2477 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2477

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.29      Bicycle             Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         speedometers                                                       31/2008
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9029.20.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 34.22 Discharge.

Once a debt has been closed out for accounting purposes and collection has been terminated, the debt is discharged. STATE must report discharged debt as income to the debtor to the Internal Revenue Service per 26 U.S.C. 6050P and 26 CFR 1.6050P-1.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Louis S. Beck, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Janus Hotels and
Resorts, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2003


/s/ Louis S. Beck
----------------------------------------------
Louis S. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
#### Phyllis Tinelli, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Tinelli, Jr., Deceased, v. Upson-Walton Co. et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to he served and filed on or before September 11, 1962 with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. If the appellant fails to comply with the conditions imposed respondent may enter an order dismissing the appeal without notice to the appellant. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Big Hollow
Como Bluffs
Sand Creek

8 National Natural Landmarks
1
2
3

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Medicine Bow

i) 10 20 40 60 80 100
Kilometers
o 5 #10 20 30 40 50
aaa
Miles

Map 2-18
National Natural Landmarks
### §16461. Transfer of resources

All books and records that relate primarily to the functions transferred to the Commission under this part shall be transferred from the Securities and Exchange Commission to the Commission.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1273, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle F (§§1261–1277) of title XII of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 972, which enacted this part, amended sections 824 and 824m of Title 16, Conservation, repealed chapter 2C (§79 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and section 825q of Title 16, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 15801 and 16451 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle F to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15801 of this title and Tables.
### §300x–26a. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. N, title I, §604(c), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3127

Section, Pub. L. 111–117, div. D, title II, §212, Dec. 16, 2009, 123 Stat. 3257, related to withholding of substance abuse funding under section 300x–26 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKER                           
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------
| |  |     | Charles Baker
      Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc.
and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nicholas SANTORA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-1103-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 25, 2007.

Greg D. Andres, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel (Peter A. Norling, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, on the brief), for Roslynn R. Maus-kopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.

Flora Edwards, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: Hon. ROGER J. MINER, Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, Hon. J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable J. Garvan Murtha, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Nicholas Santora (“Santora”) appeals from an order of March 15, 2007 detaining him pending trial. The district court concluded that Santora was a danger to the community and that the medical care at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) was adequate despite Santora’s heart condition. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the proceedings below, and the specification of issues on appeal.

Santora makes two principal arguments on appeal. First, Santora argues that the district court erred when it determined that he posed a danger to his community. Second, because of his medical condition, Santora argues that his incarceration at the MDC violated his constitutional rights. Neither argument is meritorious.

*22The district court found that Santora was a danger to his community because he was an acting underboss in the Bonanno crime family and he had committed a crime of violence, specifically conspiracy to commit extortion. These findings are more than adequate to support a finding that “no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure” the safety of the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e); *see also United States v. Ciccone,*312 F.3d 535, 541 (2d Cir.2002).

As to Santora’s constitutional challenges to the medical care at the MDC, pre-trial detention is not considered punishment for purposes of the “cruel and unusual punishment” proscription of the Eighth Amendment, *Cuoco v. Moritsugu,*222 F.3d 99, 106 (2d Cir.2000), thus, his claims arise only under the Due Process Clause. San-tora has not shown that the care he received at the MDC was impermissibly punitive, *United States v. El-Hage,*213 F.3d 74, 79 (2d Cir.2000), or that the treatment he received could be characterized as “deliberate indifference,” *Cuoco,*222 F.3d at 106, and thus, his claim under the Due Process Clause fails.

We have considered all of defendant’s other arguments and find them without merit. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the order of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William R. Davis, Deceased. Giovanni Antonelli, Appellant; James L. Kauffman, as Executor of William R. Davis, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the final account of the executor, and for other relief, Giovanni Antonelli, an objectant to said account, appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, made and entered August 24,1961 upon the decision of the Surrogate after a nonjury trial or hearing, which dismissed objeetant’s amended objection to the account and his amended claim against the decedent’s estate. The objection and the claim were based upon a judgment obtained by objectant in 1957 in a court in the Republic of Italy against decedent who had died in 1941. Decree affirmed, without costs, on the decision and opinion of the learned Surrogate (31 Misc 2d 270). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2436 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2436

       To temporarily suspend the duty on Baytron and Baytron P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To temporarily suspend the duty on Baytron and Baytron P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAYTRON AND BAYTRON P.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain aqueous dispersions) 
is amended by inserting ``, whether or not containing binder resin and 
organic solvent'' immediately before ``(CAS No.'' and by striking ``12/
31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99





Certification





I, Richard W. Talarico, as Chief Executive Officer of Allin Corporation
(the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. |  | to my knowledge, the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | to my knowledge, the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





November 13, 2002



/S/    RICHARD W. TALARICOChief Executive Officer





Certification





I, Dean C. Praskach, as Chief Financial Officer of Allin Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|3. |  | to my knowledge, the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|4. |  | to my knowledge, the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





November 13, 2002



/S/    DEAN C. PRASKACHChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20701
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       6042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   428
<PP&E>                                            3831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1827)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            18633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                       14802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33675
<SALES>                                          32542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 32542
<CGS>                                            27732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    206
<INCOME-TAX>                                        82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane Mitchell [greatlakeplace@gmail.com] Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:48 PM Adams, Kevin (OST) airline service

It onlymakes sense to negotiate to keep DeltaAirlines in Alpena. Hiring a consultant(AlpenaNews article today) makes sense also. It does not make sense to fly to Clevelandknowing that you have at least 2 more connections. It also makes sense to manypeople to drive to Saginaw or Detroit ifwe do nothave a connection from Alpena to Detroit. It makes perfect sense that Alpenaneeds a viable airline service for ourbusinesses, residents, organizations, travel agencies, and the outlying communities. It also makes sense that DOT, Alpena Chamber, travel agencies, City ofAlpena, and any one else help Alpena County fund the hiring ofthis consultant. We have used the Alpena County Airport manytimes and hope to in the future. Thank you for all ofyour hard work concerningthis matter. Karl and Diane Mitchell

1
### §3713a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3713a was editorially reclassified as section 30103 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.