alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
=
Ly
|
a)
|
L ! North Platte
Great Divide | AUC: 1018
4 josed Basil j ae
| HUC: 1404 HUC: 1018
»)
Upper Green
| HUG: 1404
| SL NMite~ Yampa SN Gl Z ‘
HUG: 1405 HUG: 1018 South Platte
HUC: 1019
oO Water Quality and 0 20 40 80120160200
eS os
Watersheds CIAA Kilometers

0 1020 40 60 80 _100
el

[5] Major Surface Water Basins
(2) Rawlins RMPPA

Miles

Map 4-1
Water Quality and Watersheds
Cumulative Impact Analysis Area

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NO INTENDED BY BLM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the forthcoming meeting of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board.  The purpose of the meeting is to kickoff the four approved fiscal year 2005 studies as directed by Air Force leadership.  The studies are “Automatic Target Recognition”, “Domain Integrations”, “System of Systems Engineering”, and “Air Force Operations in Urban Environments”.  Because classified and contractor-proprietary information will be discussed, this meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

January 10-14, 2005.

# ADDRESSES:

1560 Wilson Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22209-2404.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Major Kyle Gresham, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat, 1180 Air Force Pentagon, Rm 5D982, Washington, DC 20330-1180, (703) 697-4808. 

Albert F. Bodnar, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-27275  Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-M
§ 146.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 146235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4422 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4422

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain staple fibers of 
                             viscose rayon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain staple fibers of 
                             viscose rayon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN STAPLE FIBERS OF VISCOSE RAYON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain staple fibers of 
viscose rayon) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting 
``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey Harp, Petitioner, v New York City Police Department, Respondent.

[717 NYS2d 108]

—Determination of Police Commissioner Safir dated July 21, 1998, dismissing petitioner from the New York City Police Department after a disciplinary hearing at which he was found guilty of making false or misleading statements at an internal investigation interview, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the penalty of dismissal, the matter remanded to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.], entered on or about February 19, 1999), otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that *148petitioner made false or misleading statements at his March 13, 1997 Official Interview (see, *300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 181). However, we conclude that the penalty of dismissal was disproportionate.

Although the penalty to be imposed is a matter of discretion to be exercised by the administrative agency upon a determination based on substantial evidence, this discretion is not completely unfettered *(see, Kostika v Cuomo,*41 NY2d 673, 676). Where a penalty shocks one’s sense of fairness, for instance, *“if*the sanction imposed is so grave in its impact on the individual subjected to it that it is disproportionate to the misconduct * * * of the individual, or to the harm or risk of harm to the agency or institution,” it may be vacated *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 234).

We do not condone the making of false or misleading statements. However, dismissal and the forfeiture of pension rights simply constitute a shockingly excessive sanction here. While, under certain circumstances, making false statements is certainly sufficient to warrant dismissal *(see, e.g., Matter of Lowe v Bratton,*245 AD2d 207, *lv denied*91 NY2d 811; *Matter of Spiratos v Safir,*249 AD2d 240), this is not such a case. In *Matter of Lowe v Bratton*and *Matter of Spiratos v Safir (supra),*the false statements were made to cover up egregious or criminal conduct on the part of those petitioners. In contrast, the false statements given by petitioner here were of relatively minor significance. He was found to have falsely stated, in the context of an investigation of a fellow employee’s alleged personal use of a Police Department computer program, that he had had no contact with this fellow employee after learning that she was the subject of an internal investigation, when, in fact, telephone records could be construed as indicating that he had spoken with her.

Particularly in view of petitioner’s record of 15 years of excellent service with no prior disciplinary record, and the “Exceeds Standards” rating standard he was given, we find the penalty to be excessive. We therefore remand for consideration of a less drastic penalty. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

#### § 40.69 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Pruitt, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 888]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 1, 1993 *(People v Pruitt,*190 AD2d 692, *cert denied*510 US 880), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 21, 1991.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.
#### § 309.6 Collection in installments.

Whenever feasible, and except as required otherwise by law, debts owed to the United States, together with interest, penalties, and administrative costs as required by this regulation, should be collected in one lump sum. This is true whether the debt is being collected under administrative offset, including salary offset, or by another method, including voluntary payment. However, if the debtor is financially unable to pay the indebtedness in one lump sum, payment may be accepted in regular installments. If Peace Corps agrees to accept payment in installments, it may require a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor that specifies all of the terms of the arrangement and which contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event the debtor defaults. The size and frequency of the payments should bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and ability of the debtor to pay. If possible, the installment payments should be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the Government's claim within three years.
### §3512. Office to assist small manufacturers of medical devices; establishment

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish within the Department of Health and Human Services an identifiable office to provide technical and other nonfinancial assistance to small manufacturers of medical devices to assist them in complying with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.], as amended by this Act.

(Pub. L. 94–295, §10, May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 583; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 94–295, May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 539, known as the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which enacted this section, sections 360c to 360k, 379, 379a, of Title 21, amended sections 321, 331, 334, 351, 352, 358, 360, 374, 376 [now 379e], and 381 of Title 21, section 55 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 301 of Title 21. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1976 Amendment note set out under section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" and "Department of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" and "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare", respectively, pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM U.S.
FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,457
<PP&E>                                             386
<DEPRECIATION>                                      70
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,857
<BONDS>                                         18,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           426<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,045
<SALES>                                          1,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,437
<CGS>                                            5,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.37)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.37)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 3,186,280 SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK THAT ARE REDEEMABLE UNDER
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES BY THE COMPANY FOR REASONS NOT UNDER THE COMPANY'S
CONTROL.
<F2>PER SHARE AMOUNTS ARE DETERMINED BY DIVIDING LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS BY WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
September 17, 2015

Mr. Marc Fairstein

47 Old Forge Road

Millington, NJ 07946

Dear Mr. Fairstein:

This is in response to your letter sent to the docket (No. FAA−2015−2277) 

on June 16, 2015, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption 

from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You requested to conduct aerial 

videography, photography, and cinematography using an unmanned aerial system.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On 

June 25, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request 

without further information. Specifically, we asked you to provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On June 25, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the 

information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief and 

why granting the request would be in the public interest or the reasons why the exemption 

would not adversely affect safety.

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information, please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket.
2

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
§ 504.6 Filing requirements for litigants seeking documents or testimony. A litigant must comply with the following requirements when filing a request for official records and information or testimony under this subpart. A request should be filed before a demand. ( a ) The request must be in writing and must be submitted to the General Counsel.
( b ) The written request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs any need to maintain the confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on the BBG to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than an BBG employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require for each BBG employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( c ) The BBG reserves the right to require additional information to complete the request where appropriate.
( d ) The request should be submitted at least 30 days before the date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less than 30 days before records or testimony is required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with the request.
( f ) The request should state that the requester will provide a copy of the BBG employee's statement free of charge and that the requester will permit the BBG to have a representative present during the employee's testimony.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4367 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4367

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to limit the fee disclosure 
   requirement for an automatic teller machine to the screen of that 
                                machine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.
    Section 904(d)(3)(B) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 
U.S.C. 1693b(d)(3)(B)) (commonly known as the ``Electronic Fund 
Transfer Act'') is amended--
        (1) by striking ``requirements.'' and all that follows through 
    ``The notice required under clauses (i) and (ii)'' and inserting 
    ``requirement.--The notice required under clauses (i) and (ii)'' 
    after ``Notice''; and
        (2) by striking ``, except that during the period beginning'' 
    and all that follows and inserting a period.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
RAWLINS 

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

 Rawlins Field Office 

Rawlins, Wyoming 

Prepared by 

United States Department of the Interior 

Bureau of Land Management 

Rawlins Field Office 

In cooperation with 

The Environmental Protection Agency; the State of Wyoming; Carbon, Albany and Sweetwater 

Counties, Saratoga-Encampment-Rawlins Conservation District; Medicine Bow Conservation 

District; Little Snake River Conservation District; and Sweetwater County Conservation District 

December 2004
### §3515a. Dedicated telephone service between employee residences and computer centers

For the purpose of insuring proper management of federally supported computer systems and data bases, funds appropriated by this Act or subsequent Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Acts are available for the purchase of dedicated telephone service between the private residences of employees assigned to computer centers funded under this Act or subsequent Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Acts, and the computer centers to which such employees are assigned.

(Pub. L. 102–394, title II, §210, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 102–170, title II, §210, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1127.

Pub. L. 101–517, title II, §210, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2209.

Pub. L. 101–166, title II, §212, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1177.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(h) [title II, §213], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–256, 1329–275.