alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1508.930 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a debarring official under subpart H of this part to exclude a person from participating in covered transactions and transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1). A person so excluded is debarred.
#### § 1701.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
§ 504.4 General prohibition. ( a ) In any United States federal, state, and local proceeding or administrative action, or proceeding or administrative action conducted in a foreign country, in which the BBG is not a party, no BBG employee shall, in response to a demand or request for official records or information, furnish or produce documents or testimony as to any material contained in BBG files, any information relating to or based upon material contained in BBG files, or any information or material acquired as part of the performance of that person's official duties (or because of that person's official status) without the prior written approval of the General Counsel.
( b ) Whenever a request or demand for information is made upon a BBG employee, the employee, wherever located, shall immediately prepare a report that specifically describes the testimony or documents sought and immediately notify the General Counsel. The BBG employee shall then await instructions from the General Counsel concerning a response to the request or demand. The failure of any BBG employee to follow the procedures specified in this subpart neither creates nor confers any rights, privileges, or benefits on any person or party.
#### BLOCK, Respondent, v. NATHANSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

January 23, 1905.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District. Action by Charles Block against Jacob Nathanson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reduced and affirmed. McKee & Frost, for appellant. Max Schleimer, for respondent.

SCOTT, J.

The pleadings were oral. Defendant’s plea as returned was: “General denial. Demand bill. Admit $11.40.” After judgment the defendant moved, not to vacate the judgment absolutely,' but to modify and reduce it to $13.40. The whole course of appellant, throughout the trial and after, seems to indicate that he. admitted his indebtedness for a_ proportionate past of the monthly rent, for his use and occupation of the premises, and that he intended to qualify his general denial by that admission. The judgment should be reduced to $13.40, and, as reduced, affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 3, 2005.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1. Midwestone Financial Group, Inc., and Midwestone Financial Group ESOP*, both of Oskaloosa, Iowa; to retain MidWestOne Investments Services, Inc., Oskaloosa, Iowa, and thereby continue to engage in financial and investment advisory services and securities brokerage services, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 14, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-27729 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 1508.700 When may the suspending official issue a suspension? Suspension is a serious action. Using the procedures of this subpart and subpart F of this part, the suspending official may impose suspension only when that official determines that— ( a ) There exists an indictment for, or other adequate evidence to suspect, an offense listed under § 1508.800(a), or
( b ) There exists adequate evidence to suspect any other cause for debarment listed under § 1508.800(b) through (d); and
( c ) Immediate action is necessary to protect the public interest.
#### Sandra H. Schaumber, Respondent, v. Gerard D. Schaumber, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of all proceedings to enforce the order appealed from, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before February 16, 1961. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.10b5-2 Duties of trust or confidence in misappropriation insider trading cases. Preliminary Note to § 240.10 b
5-2:
This section provides a non-exclusive definition of circumstances in which a person has a duty of trust or confidence for purposes of the “misappropriation” theory of insider trading under Section 10(b) of the Act and Rule 10b-5. The law of insider trading is otherwise defined by judicial opinions construing Rule 10b-5, and Rule 10b5-2 does not modify the scope of insider trading law in any other respect.
( a ) *Scope of Rule.* This section shall apply to any violation of Section 10(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)) and § 240.10b-5 thereunder that is based on the purchase or sale of securities on the basis of, or the communication of, material nonpublic information misappropriated in breach of a duty of trust or confidence.
( b ) *Enumerated “duties of trust or confidence.”* For purposes of this section, a “duty of trust or confidence” exists in the following circumstances, among others: ( 1 ) Whenever a person agrees to maintain information in confidence;
( 2 ) Whenever the person communicating the material nonpublic information and the person to whom it is communicated have a history, pattern, or practice of sharing confidences, such that the recipient of the information knows or reasonably should know that the person communicating the material nonpublic information expects that the recipient will maintain its confidentiality; or
( 3 ) Whenever a person receives or obtains material nonpublic information from his or her spouse, parent, child, or sibling; *provided,* however, that the person receiving or obtaining the information may demonstrate that no duty of trust or confidence existed with respect to the information, by establishing that he or she neither knew nor reasonably should have known that the person who was the source of the information expected that the person would keep the information confidential, because of the parties' history, pattern, or practice of sharing and maintaining confidences, and because there was no agreement or understanding to maintain the confidentiality of the information.
[65 FR 51738, Aug. 24, 2000]
§ 213.7 Collection—general. ( a ) The CFO takes action to collect all debts owed the United States that arise out of USAID's activities, and to reduce debt delinquencies. Collection actions may include sending at least one written demand for payment notice to the debtor's last-known address provided in the records of USAID. Other appropriate action may proceed the written demand for payment notice, including immediate referral to DOJ for litigation, when such action is necessary to protect the Federal Government's interest.
( b ) The CFO maintains an administrative file for each debt and/or debtor which documents the basis for the debt, all administrative collection actions regarding the debt (including communications to and from the debtor) and its final disposition. Information on an individual may be disclosed only for purposes that are consistent with this part, the Privacy Act of 1974 and other applicable law.
[67 FR 47258, July 18, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 86 FR 31141, June 11, 2021]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Elmer Bregman, Appellant, and Edward A. Lashins, Jr., et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 25, 1977, denying the petition to stay the arbitration, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from an order of the same court entered February 25, 1977, denying the petitioner’s motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable (see *Fleischman v Stern,*90 NY 110; *Matter of Robinson,*30 AD2d 702) with one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of these appeals to respondents. A partnership agreement provided for arbitration of any "dispute or controversy arising under, out of, in connection with or in relation to this agreement * * * or the breach thereof, or in connection with the dissolution of the partnership”. The said agreement also provided for the entity’s books and records to be maintained at the partnership’s principal office in New York, and it is alleged in the demand for arbitration that the petitioner has retained these items in Florida. The respondents seek in the arbitration to have a turnover of the books and records and a termination of petitioner’s authority to act for the partnership, and the petitioner seeks to stay the arbitration. The arbitration should go forward as directed by the court at Special Term. Whether the arbitrator has the power to grant the relief sought will depend on the circumstances that are developed in the course of the arbitration. (Cf. *Matter of Staklinski [Pyramid Elec. Co.],*6 NY2d 159.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman and Markewich, JJ.
RECS HH Data

HOUSEHOLD DATA FROM 1993 RECS

House ID Sampled 1 Age Distribution from Age Index Adjusted RECS97 CDD CDD Adjusted RECS97 HDD HDD 93 Avg 

Age Avg. Age House ID Weight CoolUEC CoolUEC 65 65-30 HeatUEC HeatUEC 65 65-30 Elec Rate S

Index Age Dist. (Mbtu/yr) (Mbtu/yr) (cent/kWh) 

HOUSE ID 1 1 1 1 1 17450 2508 2547 1307 1287 1599 664 839 2020 10.7 

HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION 2 3 3 2 15570 10952 7042 1005 1563 11898 16221 4679 3432 7.1 

 Equip Age Index 4 3 7 7 3 43862 14135 10398 1625 2209 5492 7810 3919 2756 5.7  Equip. Age 14 4 14 14 4 10872 5426 6210 1789 1563 8389 5583 2284 3432 8.0 

5 20 20 5 20705 10187 7793 2432 3179 2716 2821 998 961 7.7 

 SEER 8.18 96 10 10 6 25482 5747 4545 1236 1563 20960 21094 3454 3432 7.8  HSPF 6.28 7 10 10 7 20385 10497 7260 1081 1563 25885 32552 4316 3432 5.4  Cooling UEC 735 kWh/yr 8 10 10 8 16564 17474 21619 3933 3179 6885 2042 285 961 8.4 

 Heating UEC 469 kWh/yr 99 10 10 9 18657 1106 1231 1740 1563 2671 1849 2376 3432 8.3 

10 31141 4453 2963 1040 1563 18357 21839 4083 3432 7.9 

 Avg. Elec Price in 1997 (97$) 10.70 cents/kWh 11 19411 17609 19758 3567 3179 6677 2279 328 961 8.7  Marg. Elec Price in 1997 (97$) 11.46 cents/kWh 12 29242 12127 15102 2751 2209 17310 9974 1588 2756 8.0 

13 23687 13858 12659 2904 3179 3916 3390 832 961 7.7 

 Avg. Elec Price in 1998 (98$) 10.49 cents/kWh Conversion from 1997$ to 1998$ 0.98 14 18950 13542 17504 4109 3179 6734 1892 270 961 8.4  Marg. Elec Price in 1998 (98$) 11.24 cents/kWh 15 16482 2676 2651 1275 1287 2546 3495 2773 2020 11.9 

Wt.Avg. Average Elec Price in 1997 (97$) 7.53 16 10872 8736 9630 1723 1563 22729 15941 2407 3432 7.7 

RECS House ID 1008 Wt.Avg. Marginal Elec Price in 1997 (97$) 6.99 17 12105 8100 5015 1107 1788 13385 17630 4365 3314 5.4 

RECS Weight 17450 Wt. Avg. Average Elec Price in 1998 (98$) 7.39 18 11717 16106 4059 654 2595 25104 53717 6950 3248 6.6 RECS Cooling UEC 2508 Wt. Avg. Marginal Elec Price in 1998 (98$) 6.86 19 13754 3444 7015 660 324 45574 57354 6042 4801 4.2 RECS Heating UEC 1599 20 28539 8352 8780 1643 1563 20081 14961 2557 3432 7.8 

1997 RECS 21 10544 12483 14427 3674 3179 4877 1974 389 961 8.1  HH Average Cooling UEC 2630 kWh/yr 22 72469 19403 21796 3571 3179 9954 3439 332 961 7.6 

 HH Average Heating UEC 3921 kWh/yr 23 17813 3560 2412 1059 1563 11115 14853 4586 3432 7.2  HH Avg Cooling SEER 9.32 24 17652 3687 3282 1029 1156 15648 13731 5273 6009 7.5  HH Avg Cooling HSPF 6.77 25 5918 8319 5532 1189 1788 12223 14395 3903 3314 5.7 

26 18907 1093 1992 2346 1287 1323 376 574 2020 10.4 27 22822 4772 5197 3462 3179 1381 493 343 961 11.0 

Page 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4937]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, the Deputy Secretary of State has concluded that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the relevant circumstances described in Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter “INA”), 8 U.S.C. 1189, exist with respect to the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group is also known as LIFG.

Therefore, the Deputy Secretary of State hereby designates that organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 219(a) of the INA.

Dated: December 15, 2004.

William P. Pope,

Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-27800 Filed 12-16-04; 5:00 pm]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
§ 504.8 Processing requests or demands. ( a ) After receiving service of a request or demand for testimony, the General Counsel will review the request and, in accordance with the provisions of this Subpart, determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to official information and/or produce official records and information.
( b ) Absent exigent circumstances, the BBG will issue a determination within 30 days from the date the request is received.
( c ) The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure described by this Subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of the BBG or the United States, or for other good cause.
( d ) Certification (authentication) of copies of records. The BBG may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. If a requester seeks certification, the requester must request certified copies from the BBG at least 30 days before the date they will be needed. The request should be sent to the BBG General Counsel.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Darren J. Cioffi, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  BEVsystems
International, Inc;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures as of December 27, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

February 10, 2004

                                            /s/   Darren J. Cioffi
                                            ----------------------
                                            Name: Darren J. Cioffi
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130163 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130163 

 COA: 254466 

Kent CC: 03-003717-NZ 

F.C. SCHOLZ, III,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

BULTSMA EXCAVATING INC., and 

HOONHORST CONCRETE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
§ 1203.735-407 Supplementary statements. ( a ) Employees, as defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 1203.735-401, shall report changes in, or additions to, the information contained in their statements of employment and financial interests in supplementary statements as of June 30 each year. If no changes or additions occur, a negative report is required.
( b ) All special Government employees, as defined in paragraph (a) of § 1203.735-401, shall submit a current statement at the time their appointments are extended. A supplementary report indicating any changes in, or additions to the information already submitted will be accepted in lieu of a full submission. If there are no changes or additions, a negative report is required.
( c ) Notwithstanding the filing of reports required by this section, each employee shall at all times avoid acquiring a financial interest that could result, or taking an action that would result, in a violation of the conflicts-of-interest provisions of section 208 of title 18, United States Code, or subpart B of this part.
( d ) An employee is also to keep current the employee's description of principal duties as to changes or additions which might possibly be an element in a conflict of interest. The employing office shall submit descriptions of changes in the principal duties of a special Government employee as they occur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALERIE GEORGE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-08-02675 EDL

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

PAGE LIMIT EXTENSION FOR

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO SUTTER

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On June 11, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion seeking to file a 55-page

opposition to the Sutter Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Good cause appearing, the

administrative motion is granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02675-EDL Document 305 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1