alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

SPA RENT AL, LLC, d/b/a/ MSI AVIATION, 

Complainant, 

v. 

SOMERSET - PULASKI COUNTY AIRPORT 

BOARD, 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-13-02 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date 

by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to July 

31, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Ed~~n! ¥2 

Associate Administrator 

for Airports 

4~ IJIJ, 2.(J/, 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 8, 2016 I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time to 

July 31, 2016 for FAA Docket No. 16-13-02 addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Konrad Kuczak 

130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Rachel Owsley 

Bethany A. Breetz 

Stites & Harbison, PLLC 

400 West Market Street, Suite 1800 

Louisville, KY 40202 

Hand delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

l

b '

~ 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
§ 225.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of December 20, 2004: 

A Closed Meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 at 10 a.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 21, 2004 will be: 

Formal orders of investigations; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

A regulatory matter regarding a financial institution; and 

An adjudicatory matter.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070. 

Dated: December 14, 2004. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-27696 Filed 12-14-04; 3:59 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOS H, WI 54903

- 3086 • T el 920.426. 6522 • F ax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG

February 5 , 2014

DOT Docket Management System 400 7th Street, SW, Room PL 401 Washington, DC 20591

Re: Fuel Exemption: Docket Number FAA

- 2001

- 9352, Exemption No. 10159

To Whom It May Concern :

EAA (the Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an international membership of more than 180,000 people in more than 100 nations, EAA brings together pilots, aircr aft owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of

Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a

commitment to aviation’s future.



### The International Aerobatic Club (IAC) was forme d in 1970 for the purpose of formalizing

the Experimental Aircraft Association’s (EAA) Precision Flying Division into a true membership organization, to write the rules and to set up the corporate structure to promote "grass roots" aerobatics.

IAC succes sfully petitioned the FAA for an exemption from §§ 91.151(a)(1) and 91.9(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowing IAC members to carry less than the visual flight rules (VFR) fuel requirements under certain conditions and be exempted f rom carrying the aircraft flight manual during aerobatic competition and aerobatic practice flights. The resulting exemption is recognized as Exemption 10159.

This petition is being submitted t o renew the current exemption, No. 10159 A

. The conditions an d reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition dated March 18, 1979 and recognized previously as Exemption 2689 and Exemption 5745, remain unchanged.

IAC requests this exemption be renewed for a three year period

.

If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at 920

- 426

- 6574.

Sincerely,

Patricia Deimer

- Steineke Manager, IAC
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27696]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
December 20, 2004:
    A Closed Meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 at 10 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9)(B), and (10) and 
17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(ii) and (10), permit 
consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 
Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 
December 21, 2004 will be:

Formal orders of investigations;
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
A regulatory matter regarding a financial institution; and
An adjudicatory matter.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-27696 Filed 12-14-04; 3:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
§ 1305.6 Processing demands. ( a ) After service of a demand to produce or disclose official documents and information, the General Counsel will review the demand and, in accordance with the provisions of this subpart, determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to official information and/or produce official documents.
( b ) If information or material is sought by a demand in any case or matter in which MCC is not a party, an affidavit or, if that is not feasible, a statement by the party seeking the information or material, or by his/her attorney setting forth a summary of the information or material sought and its relevance to the proceeding, must be submitted before a decision is made as to whether materials will be produced or permission to testify or otherwise provide information will be granted. Any authorization for testimony by a present or former employee of MCC shall be limited to the scope of the demand.
( c ) When necessary, the General Counsel will coordinate with the Department of Justice to file appropriate motions, including motions to remove the matter to Federal court, to quash, or to obtain a protective order.
( d ) If a demand fails to follow the requirements of these regulations, MCC will not allow the testimony or produce the documents.
( e ) MCC will process demands in the order in which they are received. Absent unusual circumstances, MCC will respond within 45 days of the date that the demand was received. The time for response will depend upon the scope of the demand.
( f ) The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure described by this subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of MCC or the United States or for other good cause.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4293 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude loans made to Main 

Street businesses from the definition of a member business loan, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2012 

Mr. SCHRADER (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude loans 

made to Main Street businesses from the definition of 

a member business loan, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore Main Street’s 

5 Credit Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF MAIN STREET BUSINESS LOANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 107A of the Federal 

8 Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (c)— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4293 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (1)(B)— 

2 (i) in clause (v), by striking the period 

3 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

4 (ii) by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(vi) that is made to a Main Street 

7 business;’’; 

8 (B) in paragraph (2)(B)(ii), by striking 

9 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

10 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking the pe11 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(4) the term ‘Main Street business’ means an 

14 organization, other than a nonprofit organization, 

15 with 20 or fewer full-time employees that possesses, 

16 occupies, or leases a physical property other than a 

17 home for the business’s operations.’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(f) MAIN STREET BUSINESS LENDING GUIDE20 LINES.—With respect to extensions of credit made by an 

21 insured credit union the proceeds of which will be used 

22 for a commercial, corporate or other business investment 

23 property or venture, or agricultural purpose, the Board 

24 shall issue guidelines for such extensions of credit made 

25 to Main Street businesses to— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4293 IH

1 ‘‘(1) promote appropriate levels of such exten2 sions within the credit union’s total lending port3 folio; 

4 ‘‘(2) promote the cooperative nature of the 

5 credit union; and 

6 ‘‘(3) promote the safety and soundness of the 

7 credit union.’’. 

8 (b) ISSUANCE OF GUIDELINES.—Not later than the 

9 end of the 120-day period beginning on the date of the 

10 enactment of this Act, the National Credit Union Adminis11 tration Board shall issue the guidelines described under 

12 section 107A(f) of the Federal Credit Union Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,515
<SECURITIES>                                    19,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,185
<INVENTORY>                                        852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,367
<PP&E>                                           3,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,389
<SALES>                                         12,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,687
<CGS>                                            2,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (59)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                       402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Amendment and Change in Terms Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 AMENDMENT AND 
 CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 25th day of October, 2010
(this “Agreement”), by and between KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, whose address is 17199 North Laurel Park Drive, Suite 105, Livonia, Michigan 48152, Mailcode MI-06-07-0105 (“Lender”) and
UNIVERSAL TRUCKLOAD SERVICES, INC., a Michigan corporation with offices at 12755 East Nine Mile Road, Warren, Michigan 48089 (“Borrower”). 
 RECITALS: 
 A. Lender and Borrower have entered into that certain Loan
Agreement between Borrower and Lender dated October 29, 2007, as amended by a First Amendment to Loan Agreement and First Amendment to Promissory Note dated as of October 28, 2008, a Second Amendment to Loan Agreement and Second Amendment
to Promissory Note dated October 26, 2009, and a Third Amendment to Loan Agreement and Third Amendment to Promissory Note dated August 24, 2010 (as so amended, the “Existing Loan Agreement”). 

B. Lender and Borrower are presently negotiating an amended and restated loan agreement to replace the Existing Loan Agreement. While
negotiations are expected to be completed in the near future, they will not be completed prior to the current maturity of the Note (which occurs on the date hereof), and the parties desire to extend such maturity for a limited period of time to
accommodate such negotiations. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Borrower and the Lender agree as
follows: 
 1. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings accorded such terms in
the Existing Loan Agreement. 
 2. The Note will remain outstanding. However, notwithstanding the express terms of the Note, the
Maturity Date, as defined in the Existing Loan Agreement and the Note, shall be amended to, and deemed to be, November 8, 2010. 
 3. Except as expressly amended and changed by this Agreement, the terms of the original obligation or obligations, including all agreements evidencing or securing the obligation(s), remain unamended and
unchanged and in full force and effect. Consent by the Lender to this Agreement does not waive the Lender’s right to strict performance of the obligation(s) as changed, nor obligate the Lender to make any future change in terms. Nothing in this
Agreement will constitute a satisfaction of the obligation(s). 







  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Change in Terms Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	BORROWER:
	
	 UNIVERSAL TRUCKLOAD SERVICES, INC.,
 a Michigan corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Sigler

	Name:	 	 Robert Sigler

	Title:	 	 Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

	
	LENDER:
	
	 KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 a national banking association

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Erik Siersma

	Name:	 	 Erik Siersma

	Its:	 	 Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Affoon, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 897]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), rendered November 19, 2004, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that *1043branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. The showup identification procedure, which was conducted in close spatial and temporal proximity to the commission of the crime, served to secure a prompt and reliable identification of the defendant *(see People v Nieves,*26 AD3d 519, 520 [2006]; *People v Hunt,*277 AD2d 911, 912 [2000]). The defendant’s contention that the showup identification was unduly suggestive is without merit *(see People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541, 544 [1991]; *People v Loo,*14 AD3d 716 [2005]).

The defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a missing-witness charge. However, the court properly denied his motion concerning four of the five missing witnesses. Concerning the fifth witness, the court’s failure to provide a missing-witness charge was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Fields,*76 NY2d 761 [1990]; *People v Morgan,*228 AD2d 704, 705 [1996]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### Taft Partners Development Group et al., Respondents, v Sholom Drizin, Appellant. (And Another Action.)

[717 NYS2d 53]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 5, 2000, which, in an action between partners involving, *inter alia,*a counterclaim by defendant that plaintiffs mismanaged the partnership’s property, granted plaintiffs’ motion to take the depositions of defendant’s expert witnesses, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant alleges that the partnership acquired a hotel in need of renovations estimated by independent sources to be $60,000,000; that plaintiffs renovated the hotel at a cost in excess of $140,000,000; and that the latter amount “reflected various overcharges, illegal billing procedures, fraudulent practices and profit taking” in violation of plaintiffs’ fiduciary duty to defendant. It appears that these allegations are based not on any facts personally known to defendant, but rather on an accountant’s review of partnership documents and the opinion of a construction industry executive as to what the renovation should have cost. If the accountant and executive are indeed “experts” for purposes of disclosure, it also appears that they are in possession of facts relevant to defendant’s claims, and, to that extent, special circumstances exist within the meaning of CPLR 3101 (d) (1) warranting their depositions. We note the representation in plaintiffs’ brief that they seek to depose these witnesses “specifically * * * as to the facts,” not their opinions. We also note the motion court’s readiness to closely monitor the depositions *(cf., Rosario v General Motors Corp.,*148 AD2d 108, 113). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.