alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACYPROJECT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

    v.

MAYOR GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,

Defendants.                                                                      /

No. C-08-4087 MMC

ORDER VACATING MAY 28, 2010 CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

In light of the pendency of the parties’ Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of

Settlement Agreement, the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 28, 2010 is

hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  May 25, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04087-MMC   Document 92   Filed 05/25/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T09:12:52-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
19–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 112–230 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE 

BILL (H.R. 2832) TO EXTEND THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

OCTOBER 3, 2011.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 418] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 418, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 

2832) to extend the Generalized System of Preferences, and for 

other purposes, and the Senate amendment thereto. The resolution 

makes in order a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on 

Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 2832. The resolution waives all points of 

order against consideration of the motion. The resolution provides 

that the Senate amendment shall be considered as read. Finally, 

the resolution provides for one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion, the Committee is not aware of any points of order 

against consideration of the motion. The waiver of all points of 

order against consideration of the motion is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
### §2210c. Elimination of pension offset for certain rehired Federal retirees

#### (a) In general

The Commission may waive the application of section 8344 or 8468 of title 5 on a case-by-case basis for employment of an annuitant—

(1) in a position of the Commission for which there is exceptional difficulty in recruiting or retaining a qualified employee; or

(2) when a temporary emergency hiring need exists.

#### (b) Procedures

The Commission shall prescribe procedures for the exercise of authority under this section, including—

(1) criteria for any exercise of authority; and

(2) procedures for a delegation of authority.

#### (c) Effect of waiver

An employee as to whom a waiver under this section is in effect shall not be considered an employee for purposes of subchapter II of chapter 83, or chapter 84, of title 5.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §170C, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title VI, §624(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 783.)
#### § 274.11 [Reserved]
#### § 204.42 Notice.

Any communication to A.I.D. pursuant to this Guaranty shall be in writing in the English language, shall refer to the A.I.D. Housing Guaranty Project Number inscribed on the Eligible Note and shall be complete on the day it shall be actually received by A.I.D. at the address specified below:

Mail Address:

Office of Housing and Urban Programs, Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523.

Re: A.I.D. Housing Guaranty Project ____-HG-____[1]

Telex Nos.: ITT 440001 (Answer back is AIDWNDC) RCA 248379 (Answer back is 248379 AID UR) WU 892703 (Answer back is AID WSH) WU 64154 (Answer back is AID 64154)

Fax No.: 202/647-4958

Cable Address: AID WASH DC

Other addresses may be substituted for the above upon the giving of notice of such substitution to each Lender or Assignee by first class mail at the addresses set forth in the Note Register.

###### Footnotes -
  204.42

[1] Enter title and numerical designation of the relevant A.I.D. Housing Guaranty Project as inscribed on each Note guaranty legend.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Larry Egerton, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for leave to dispense with printing granted. The-appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of .his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to *795perfect the appeal is enlarged to the April Term, beginning March 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Leon Goodman, Esq., 32 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                                     5

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                7,874,887
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         2,049,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     11,250,694
<PP&E>                                                               91,475,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        6,913,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      127,347,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 7,951,844
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 168
<COMMON>                                                                118,833
<OTHER-SE>                                                           46,673,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        127,347,078
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     10,929,450
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         4,322,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    1,531,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         165,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             68,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      93,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           17,415
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            110,990
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.02)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31(ii)**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Sharon Draper, Chief Accounting Officer of Tice Technology, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tice Technology, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days priorto the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

d) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

e) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the dateof our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
### §3796hh–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796hh–4 was editorially reclassified as section 10465 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 214.44 Annual review and reports. ( a ) A.I.D. conducts an annual comprehensive review of advisory committees under instructions provided by OMB Circular A-63, section 10, as amended and submits required data to OMB on the prescribed format, by November 30 of each year.
( b ) A.I.D. reports monthly to OMB on committee terminations or other significant changes in continuing A.I.D. Advisory Committees.
( c ) A.I.D. also provides information to the General Services Administration (GSA) for an annual report to Congress. The Agency report is due on February 1 of each year; includes only those advisory committees established by or reporting to A.I.D.; and is submitted on a form prescribed by GSA.
( d ) Within A.I.D., the Advisory Committee Management Officer collects required information from the A.I.D. Advisory Committee Representatives; appraises advisory committee activities for the Administrator; and prepares the Agency's reports for the Administrator.
### §1437f–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–6, div. G, title II, §236, Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 467

Section, Pub. L. 113–235, div. K, title II, §221, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2754, related to report on section 8 project-based housing.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior acts:

Pub. L. 113–76, div. L, title II, §225, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 632.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00194-CV

IN RE SANTIKOS LEGACY, LTD.

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice 

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 23, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION DENIED

On March 11, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of injunction. The court has 

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of injunction is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-17452, styled Dragon Fish, LLC d/b/a Motif Modern Living, et 

al. v. Santikos Legacy, Ltd. et al. v. C. Hodges & Assocs., PLLC d/b/a Hodges & Associates, et al., pending in the 

73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée F. McElhaney presiding. However, the 

order complained of was signed by the Honorable David Peeples, presiding judge of the Fourth Administrative 

Judicial Region.
#### Allan S. Sexter et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Kimmelman, Sexter, Warmflash & Leitner, Defendant, and Je*187rome M. Leitner et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[716 NYS2d 661]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered December 3, 1999, which granted, in part, defendants’ motion and cross motion to compel further discovery and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel further discovery, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 9, 2000, which, *inter alia,*held plaintiffs in contempt for failure to comply with court-ordered discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in ordering plaintiffs to produce to defendant partners of Kimmelman, Sexter, Warmflash & Leitner documents and other information, including client will files, regarding matters that were ongoing as of September 17, 1992, the date of the partnership’s dissolution *(see, Finkelstein v Fine Finkelstein Olin & Anderman,*169 AD2d 662; *Foley v Kaplan,*162 AD2d 155, 156; Partnership Law § 42).

Plaintiffs’ notice for discovery and inspection was served more than five months after the date set by the court for service of such notice and, accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its broad discretion with respect to the conduct of discovery in denying plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel a further response from defendants *(see, Coudert Bros, v Malmrose,*268 AD2d 261).

The court also properly limited defendants’ deposition of plaintiffs’ former litigation counsel to the documents that plaintiffs disclosed. Defendants failed to show that the additional information they sought was likely to lead to relevant evidence *(see, Crazytown Furniture v Brooklyn Union Gas Co.,*150 AD2d 420, 421) or that the information could not be obtained by other means, such as by deposing plaintiffs *(see, Perez v Board of Educ.,*271 AD2d 251).

The court was not required to hold a hearing before issuing the appealed contempt order because the documents submitted by defendants established with reasonable certainty that plaintiffs knowingly disobeyed the court’s earlier discovery orders *(see, Coronet Capital Co. v Spodek,*202 AD2d 20, 29). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
§ 521.12 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and answer, the ALJ shall promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the defendant in the manner prescribed by § 521.8. At the same time, the ALJ shall send a copy of such notice to the representative for the Government.
( b ) Such notice shall include: ( 1 ) The tentative time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the representative of the Government and of the defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2481 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2481

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.16      Bicycle wheel rims  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (provided for in                                                   31/2008
                         subheading
                         8714.92.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the Department of State or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule 22 CFR part 135 that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.,* any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
### §3914. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §474(e)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1239

Section, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §415, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 517, defined "land development", "actual costs", and "new community assistance projects" for purposes of this chapter.
#### X. Amusement Company, Inc., v. Hermos Amusement Company, Inc.

Motion for stay denied, with ten dollars costs, and temporary stay *965vacated. Present—'Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
#### Hall *v.*Coleman.

Atkinson, J.

1. To a suit of foreclosure by a transferee of a note and mortgage on realty the defendant interposed a plea to the eifect that she was a married woman at the time of the execution of the note, and that “the note and mortgage” were given for the debt of her husband, and the transferee took them with notice of these facts. On the trial there was evidence to the eifect that the defendant’s husband, having been convicted of a misdemeanor, was in jail under a sentence, to pay a fine. The defendant testified that she called on the agent of the payee to pay the fine, and the latter asked, “Will you give me security for him paying it back and working it out?” The note was given, “so that if Sam [the husband] did not stay there and work out” the fine, *735“I would, pay it for him.” Defendant’s husband had been working for the payee, and thereafter continued to do so, “working to pay that debt.” There was no evidence that the husband made any promise to the payee to induce him to pay the fine, or that he was consulted in regard to the negotiation which led to payment of the fine. He was in jail when the note was executed. Defendant further testified: “When I saw Judge Brewton I got the mortgage fixed up. I signed it, he paid the money in his office to get [defendant’s husband] out of jail. . I did not get it and did not pay it.” On the subject of notice the evidence was to the effect that the plaintiff transferee was an agent of the payee and successor to the agent who paid the fine, and that he knew that defendant’s husband was “working out this debt.” In the presence of the defendant the plaintiff was told by another person, in the spring of 1908 before the transfer in August, that she was the wife of the convict whose fine had been paid, and at the same time she asked the payee, in the presence of the plaintiff, “How long before my note will come back to me?” and was informed, “It won’t be very long.” *Held:*

September 27, 1912.

Mortgage foreclosure. Before Judge Sheppard. Liberty superior court. June 15, 1911.

*Shelby Myrick,*for plaintiff in error. *J. B. Thomas,*contra.

*{a)*The fine imposed on the husband of the plaintiff was not a debt due by him to the State.

(i>) Under the evidence, the contract to repay the amount paid out in discharge of the fine was the original undertaking of the wife, and in no sense in payment of or as security for a debt due by her husband.

(c) If the debt had been that of the husband, the evidence was insufficient to show notice of such fact to the transferee.

2. Assignments of error which are not urged in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will be considered as abandoned.

3. Under the pleadings and evidence, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*