52216 Federal Register / Vol. 53, No. 243 / Tuesday, D ecem ber 27, 1988 / Notices

use of the National Assessment of Education Progress, and develop specifications for the design, methodology, analysis and reporting of test results. The Board also is responsible for selecting subject areas to be assessed, identifying the objectives for each age and grade tested, and establishing standards and procedures for interstate and national comparisons.

A subgroup of the National Assessment Governing Board will meet in Washington, DC on January 11,1989, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The proposed agenda includes consideration of the Board’s organizational and staffing requirements.

Records are kept of all Board proceedings, and until a permanent office site for the Board has been established, are available for public inspection at the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 555 New Jersey Avenue NW., Room 600, Washington, DC from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.

Dated: December 21,1988. Patricia Hines, Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational Research and Improvemen t. (FR Doc. 88-29627 Filed 12-23-88; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Conservation and Renewable Energy Office

National Energy Extension Service Advisory Board; Open Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-263, 86 Stat. 770), notice is hereby given of the following advisory committee meeting:

Name:National Energy Extension Service Advisory Board.

Date and Tim e:Wednesday, January 18,1989, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; Thursday, January 19,1989, 8 a.m.-12 noon.

Place:Radisson Mark Plaza Hotel, 5000 Seminary Road, Alexandria, VA.

Contact:Susan D. Heard, Department of Energy, Forrestal Building—6A081, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, Telephone: 202- 586-8290.

Purpose o f the Board:The Board was established to carry on a continuing review of the National Energy Extension Service and the plans and activities of each State in implementing Energy Extension Service programs. Additionally, the Board is responsible for reporting on an annual basis to the Congress, the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of the Energy Extension Service.

Tentative Agenda:Wednesday, January 18,1989. • Preparation of a draft of the Board’s

Tenth Annual Report • Public comment (10 minute rule) • Thursday, January 19,1989. • Preparation of a draft of the Board’s

Tenth Annual Report • Public comment (10 minute rule)

Public Participation:The meeting is open to the public. The Chairperson of the Committee is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in his judgment, facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the Committee will be permitted to do so either before or after the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact Susan D. Heard at 202-586-8290. Requests must be received at least 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation on the agenda.

Transcripts:Available for public review and copying at the Public Reading Room, IE-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Issued at Washington, DC, on December 21, 1988. J. Robert Franklin, Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 88-29652 Filed 12-23-88; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-M

Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy

[Case No. C AC-004]

Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products; Decision and Order Granting Waiver From Test Procedures for Central Air Conditioners From Airlex Industries, LTD.

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy.

ACTION: Decision and order.

summar y : Notice is given of the Decision and Order (Case No. CAC-004) granting Airlex Industries, LTD., a wavier for its ERA/S-RC/RH model series heat pumps in the heating mode from existing DOE test procedures for determining the model’s Heating Seasonal Performance Factors. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglass S. Abramson, U.S. Department

of Energy, Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy, Forrestal Building, Mail Station, CE-132,1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9127. Eugene Margolis, Esq., U.S. Department

of Energy, Office of General Counsel,Forrestal Building, Mail Station, GC12,1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9507.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(g), notice is hereby given of the issuance of the Decision and Order as set out below. Airlex Industries, LTD., has been granted a waiver for its ERA/S-RC/RH model, series central air conditioner (heat pump) permitting the company to use an alternate test method in determining the Heating Seasonal Performance Factors (HSPF).

Issued in Washington, DC, December 19, 1988. Dr. John R. Berg, Assistant Secretary Conservation and Renewable Energy.

The Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products (other than automobiles) was established pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 917, as amended by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA), Pub. L. 95-619, 92 Stat. 3266, the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987 (NAECA), Pub. L. 100-12, and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Amendment of 1988 (NAECA 1988), Pub. L. 100-357, which requires DOE to prescribe standardized test procedures to measure the energy consumption of certain consumer products, including central air conditioners and heat pumps. The intent of the test procedures is to provide a comparable measure of energy consumption that will assist consumers in making purchasing decisions. These test procedures appear at 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B.

DOE has amended the prescribed test procedures by adding 10 CFR 430.27 on September 26,1980, creating the waiver process. 45 FR 64108. DOE further amended the Department’s appliance test procedure waiver process to allow the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy to grant an interim waiver from test procedure requirements to manufacturers that have petitioned DOE for a waiver of such prescribed test procedures. 51 FR 42823, November 26,1986. The waiver processs allows the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy to waive temporarily test procedures for a 

### 52216 Federal Register / 

### Vol. 53, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 1988 / Notices

use of the National Assessment of Education Progress, and develop specifications for the design, methodology, analysis and reporting of
test results. The Board also is responsible for selecting subject areas to be assessed, identifying the objectives for each age and grade tested. and establishing standards and procedures for interstate and national comparisons.

A subgroup of the National Assessment Governing Board will meet in Washington, DC on January 11. 1989, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The proposed agenda includes consideration of the Board's organizational and staffing requirements.

Records are kept of all Board proceedings, and until a permanent office site for the Board has been established, are available for public inspection at the U.S. Department of Education, Office ofEducational Research and hnprovement, 555 New Jersey Avenue NW

.. Room 600, Washington, DC from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.

Dated: December 21, 1988. Patricia Hines,
A elingAssistantSecretory forEducati onal ResearchandImprovement. [FR Doc. 88-29627 Filed 12-23-88: 8:45 am)

BIWNG COD£ 400CH)H I

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Conservation and Re newable Energy Offic e

National Ene rgy Extension Service Advisory Board; Open Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-263, 86 Stat 770), notice is hereby given ofthe following advisory committee meeting:

Nome: National Energy Extension Service Advisory Board.

Dote and Time: Wednesday, January 18

, 1989, 8 a.m.-5 p.m.; Thursday, January 19, 1989, 8 a.m.-12 noon.

Place: Radisson Mark Plaza Hotel, 5000 Seminary Road, Alexandria, VA.

Contact: Susan D. Heard, Department of Energy, Forrestal Building-6A081. 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, Telephone: 202- 586-8290.

Purpose of the Board: The Board was established to carry on a continuing review of the National Energy Extension Service and the plans and activities of each State in implementing Energy Extension Service programs. Additionally, the Board is responsible for reporting on an annual basis to the Congress, the Secretary ofEnergy

, and the Director of the Energy Extension Service.

Tentative Agenda: Wednesday, January 18, 1989.

• Preparation of a draft of the Board's

Tenth Annual Report

• Public comment (10 minute rule)

• Thursday, January 19, 1989.

• Preparation of a draft of the Board's

Tenth Annual Report

• Public comment (10 minute rule)

PublicParticipation: The meeting is
open to the public. The Chairperson of the Committee 

### is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in hls judgment, facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the Committee will bepermitted to do so either before or after the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact Susan D. Heard at 202-586-8290. Requests must be received 

### et least 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation on the agenda.

Transcripts: Available for public review and copying atthe Public Reading Room, lE-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
except Federal holidays.

Issued at Washington, DC. on December 21, 1988. 

### J

.Robert Franklin, Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 88-~52Filed 12-23-88; 8:45 am]

B IWNG CODE 6450-01-U

Office of Conservation and Ren ewabl e Energy

[Case No

. CAC-004]

Energy Conservation Program fo r Consu me r Product s; Decision and Order Granting Waive r From Test Procedur es for Cent ral Air Conditioners F rom Al rlex Ind ustries, LTD.

AGENCY: Department ofEnergy, Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy.

ACTION: Decision and order.

SUMMARY: Notice is given of the Decision and Order (Case No. CAC--004) granting Airlex lndustries, 

### LTD., a wavier for its ERA/S-RC/RH model series heat pumps in the heating mode from existing DOE test procedures for determining the model's Healing Seasonal Performance Factors

. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglass S. Abramson, U.S. Department

ofEnergy, Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy, Forrestal Building. Mail Station. CE-132, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9127. Eugene Margolis, Esq

.. U.S. Department

ofEnergy, Office of General Counsel

, Forrestal Building, Mail Station, GC12, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586---9507

. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMA T ION: In accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(g), not ice is hereby given of the issuance of the Decision and Order as set out below. Airlex Industries, 

### LTD

.. has been granted a waiver for its ERA/S-RC/RH model, series central air conditioner (heat pump) permitting the company to

use an alternate test method in determining the Heating Seasonal Performance Factors (HSPF}.

Issued in Washington, DC, December 19

. 1988. Or. John R

. Berg, .4.ssistant SecretoryCanservati on and RenewableEnergy.

The Energy Conservation Program 

### for Consumer Products (other than automobiles} was established pursua nt
to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 917,

as amended by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA), Pub. L. 95--619, 92 Stat. 3266, the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987 (NAECA), Pub. L. 100--12, and the National Appliance Energy Conservation Amendment of 1968 (NAECA 1988), Pub. L. lQ0-357, which requires DOE to prescribe standardized
test procedures to measure the energ y consumption of certain consumer products, including central air conditioners and heat pumps. The intent of the test procedures is to provide a comparable measure ofenergy consumption that will assist consumers in making purchasing decisions. These
test procedures appear at 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B.

DOE has amended the prescribed t est procedw·es by adding 10 CFR 430.27 on September26, 1980, creating the waiver process. 45 FR 64108. DOE further amended the Department's appliance test procedure waiver process to allo w the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy to grant an interim waiver from test procedure requirements to manufacturers that have petitioned DOE for a waiver ofsuch prescribed test procedures. 51 FR 42823

, November 26, 1986. The waiver processs allows the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy t o waive temporarily test procedures for a 

# .

'



## '

I

I

;

I



# •

I

' I

# ~Federal Register / Voi. 53, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 1988 / Notices 

### 52217

particular basic model when a petitioner shows that the basic model contains one or more design characteristics which prevent testing according to the prescribed test procedures or when the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. Waivers generally remain in effect until final test procedure amendments become effective, resolving the problem that is the subject of a waiver.

Airlex Industries LTD., (Airlex) filed a “Petition for Waiver” dated August 24, 1988, in accordance with § 430.27 of 10 CFR Part 430. DOE published in the Federal Register Airlex's petition, and solicited comments, data and information respecting the petition. 53 FR 39130, October 3,1988. Airlex filed an “Application for Interim Waiver” under § 430.27(g) which DOE granted on October 3,1988. 53 FR 39130.

No comments were received concerning either the “Petition for Waiver” or the “Interim Waiver.” DOE consulted with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), formerly the National Bureau of Standards, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), concerning the Airlex petition. The NIST submitted to DOE an evaluation of the waiver test procedure in a letter report dated, November 21,1988. The FTC voiced no opposition to the issuance of the waiver to Airlex.

Assertions and Determinations

Airlexs petition seeks a waiver from the DOE test provisions that require a low temperature test at 17°F and a Frost Accumulation Test at 35°F. Instead, Airlex requests permission to perform the low temperature test at 47°F and omit the Frost Accumulation Test at 35°F when testing its heat pumps model series ERA/S-RC/RH to determine HSPF. Airlex stated that the heating ability of its heat pumps is disengaged and replaced by electric resistance heating for temperatures below 40°F. Since DOE test procedures do not address this control feature, Airlex asked that a waiver be granted.

NIST, in its review of the Airlex petition, conclude that it was reasonable for Airlex to accurately determine capacity and power profiles for model series ERA/S-RC/RH down to 40°F. NIST expressed no concern that at 40°F frosting would occur.

DOE, in reviewing the comments by NIST, has determined that in order to provide a fair approach to Airlex and an equitable comparison with other models for consumers, the test procedure proposed by Airlex is suitable provided the disengaging temperature is set at 40°F with the low temperature test run at 47°F.

Since DOE did not receive any comments on the petition, the petition and NIST’s analysis of Airlex’s petition have provided the basis for DOE’s determination on the procedure requested by Airlex and its suitability as an alternative to the existing procedure.

Based on the information provided by the petitioner, the NIST analysis and the Department’s review, DOE is granting Airlex’s request for the use of an alternate test procedure to determinethe HSPF for its model series ERA /SRC/RH central air conditioner, heat pumps with the modifications discussed above.

It is, therefore, ordered that: (1) The “Petition for Waiver” filed by Airlex Industries, LTD., (CAC-004) is hereby granted as set forth in paragraph (2) below, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (3), (4) and (5).

(2) Not withstanding any contrary provisions of Appendix M of 10 CFR Part 430 Subpart B, Airlex Industries, LTD. shall be permitted to test its ERA/ S-RC/RH model central air conditioners and heat pumps on the basis specified in 10 CFR Part 430, with the modifications set forth below:

(i) Test Procedure. The test procedure shall be as specified in Appendix M of 10 CFR Part 430 Subpart B for determining the Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEEA) without modification. The Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPF) shall be tested in accordance with Appendix M with the following modifications:

(a) The high temperature test, section 3.2.1.1, will be performed at 62°F outdoor temperature;

(b) The low temperature test, section 3.2.1.4, will be performed at 47°F dry bulb, 43°F wet bulb outdoor temperature in lieu of the existing 17°F test;

(c) The requirement for a 35°F Frost Accumulation Test, section 3.2.1.3, is deleted; and

(d) The set point for the model to disengage heat pump operation is to be at 40°F,

(ii) Heating Seasonal Performance Factor. The heating seasonal performance factor (HSPF) shall be expressed in Btu per watt-hour, for each of die six regions specified.

A separate HSPF shall be determined for the standardized maximum DHR, the standardized minimum DHR and for all other standardized DHR’s in Appendix M between the maximum and minimum values.

(3) The waiver shall remain in effect from the date of issuance of this Order until the Department of Energy prescribes final test procedures appropriate to this model central air conditioner and heat pump.

(4) This waiver is based upon the presumed validity of statements, allegations, and documentary materials submitted by the applicant and in the

comments. This waiver may be revoked or modified at any time upon a determination that the factual basis underlying the application is incorrect.

(5) Effective January 26,1989, this waiver supersedes the Interim Waiver granted Airlex on October 5,1988. 53 FR 39130. (Case No. CAC-004).

[FR Doc. 88-29651 Filed 12-23-88; 8:45 am]

BILUNG CODE 6450-C1-M

Energy Information Administration

Agency Information Collections Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

ag en c y : Energy Information Administration, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of requests submitted for review by the Office of Management and Budget.

SUMMARY: The Energy Information Administration (EIA) has submitted the energy information collection(s) listed at the end of this notice to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

The listing does not include information collection requirements contained in new or revised regulations which are to be submitted under section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act, nor management and procurement assistance requirements collected by the Department of Energy (DOE).

Each entry contains the following information: (1) The sponsor of the collection (the DOE component or Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)); (2) collection number(s); (3) current OMB docket number (if applicable); (4) collection title; (5) type of request, e.g., new, revision, or extension; (6) frequency of collection; (7) response obligation, i.e., mandatory, voluntary, or required to obtain or retain benefit; (8) affected public; (9) an estimate of the number of respondents per report period; (10) an estimate of the number of responses annually; (11) an estimate of the average hours per response; (12) the estimated total annual respondent burden, and (13) a brief - abstract describing the proposed collection and the respondents. '

1

,

1

, 

### Federal Register / 

### Vol. 53, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 27, 1988 / Notices 52217

particular basic model when a petitioner shows that the basic model contains one

ormore design characteristics which prevent testing according to the prescribed les1 procedures or when the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative ofits true energy consumption 

### as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. Waivers
generaUy remain in effect until final test procedure amendments become effective, resolving the problem that is the subject of 

### a waiver.

Airlex Industries LTD., (Airlex) filed a "Petition for 

### Waiver" dated August 24, 1988, 

### in accordance with § 430.27 

### of 10 

### CFR Part 430. 

### DOE published in 

### the Federal Register Airlex's petition, and solicited comments, data and information respecting the petition. 53 FR 39130, 

### October 3, 1988. 

### Airlex filed

an "Application for Interim Waiver" under § 430.27(g) 

### which DOE 

### granted on October 3, 1988. 53 

### FR 39130.



### No comments were received concerning either the "Petition for Waiver" or the "Interim Waiver." DOE consulted with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), formerly the National Bureau of Standards, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), concerning the Airlex petition. The NIST submitted to DOE an evaluation of the waiver test procedure in 

### a letter report dated, November 21, 1988. 

### The FTC voiced no opposition to the issuance of the waiver
to Airlex.

Assertions and Determinations



### Airlexs petition seeks a waiver from the DOE test provisions that require a 

### low temperature test at 17°F 

### and a Frost Accumulation Test at 35°F. 

### Instead, Airlex requests permission to perform the low temperature test at 47°F 

### and omit the Frost Accumulation Test at 35°F when testing its heat pumps model series ERA/S-RC/RH to determine HSPF. Airlex stated that the heating ability of its heat pumps is disengaged and replaced by electric resistance heating for temperatures below 40°F. 

### Since DOE testprocedures do not address this control feature, Airlex asked that a waiver be granted.

NIST, in its review ofthe Airlex petition, conclude that it 

### was reasonable for Airlex to accurately determine capacity and power profiles for model series ERA/S-RC/RH down to 40°F. 

### NIST expressed no concern that al 40•p 

### frosting would occur.

DOE, in reviewing the comments by NIST, has determined that in 

### order to provide a fair approach to Airlex and an equitable comparison with olht:r models for consumers, the test procedure proposed by Airlex is suitable provided the disengaging temperature 

### is set at 40°F 

### with the low temperature test run at 47°F.



### Since DOE did not receive any comments on the petition, the petition and NIST's analysis ofAirlex's petition have provided the basis for DOE's determination on the procedure requested by Airlex and its suitability as

an alternative to the existing procedure.

Based on the information provided by the petitioner, the MST analysis and the Departmenfs review, DOE is granting Airlex's request for the use of an alternate test procedure to determine the HSPF for its model series ERA/SRC/RH central air conditioner, heat
pumps with the modifications discussed above.

II is, therefore, ordered that: (1) 

### The "Petition for Waiver" filed by Airlex industries, 

### LTD., (CAC-oo4) is hereby grantedas set forth in paragraph (2) 

### below, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (3), (4) 

### and (SJ.

(2) 

### Not withstanding any contrary provisions ofAppendix M 

### of 10 

### CFR Part 430 

### Subpart B, Airlex Industries, 

### LTD. shall be permitted to test its 

### ERA/ S-RC/RH model central air conditioners and heat pumps on the basis specified in
10 

### CFR Part 430, 

### with the modifications
set forth below:

(i} Test Procedure. The test procedure shall be as specified in Appendix 

### M of
10 

### CFR Part 430 

### Subpart B for determining the Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEEA) without modification. The Heating Seasonal Performance Factor (HSPFJ shall be tested in 

### accordance with Appendix 

### M with the following modifications:

(a) 

### The high temperature test, section 3.2.1.1, 

### will be performed at 62°F 

### outdoor temperature;

(bl The low temperature test, section 3.2.1.4, will 

### be performed at 47"F dry 

### bulb, 43°F 

### wet bulb outdoor temperature in lieu of the existing 17"F 

### test;

(c) The requirement for a 35°F 

### Frost Accumulation Test, section 3.2.1.3, 

### is deleted: and

(d) The set point for the model to disengage heat pump operation is to be
at 40°F.

(ii} 

### Healing Seasonal Performance Factor. The heating seasonal performance factor (HSPF) shall be expressed in Btu per watt-hour. for each of the six regions specified.

A separate HSPF shall be determined for the standardized maximum OHR, the standardized minimum OHR and for all other standardized DHR's in Appendix M between the maximum and minimum values.

(3) 

### The waiver shall remain In effect from the date of issuance of this Order until the Department of Energy prescribes final test procedures appropriate to this model central air conditioner and heat pump.

[4) 

### This waiver is based upon the presumed validity ofstalernents, allegations, and documentary materials submitted by the applicant and in the
comments. This waiver may be revoked

or modified al 

### any time upon a determination that the factual basis underlying the application is incorrect.

(5) 

### Effective January 26, 1989, 

### this waiver 

### supersedes the Interim Waiver granted Airlex on October 5. 1988. 

### 53 FR
39130. 

### (Case No. CAG--004).
[FR 

### Doc. 88-29651 

### Filed 12-23-88: 8:45 aml

BILLING CODE 6451H11-M

Energy Information Administration

Agency Information Collections Under Review 

### by the Office of Management and Budget

AGENCY: 

### Energy [nfonnation Administration, DOE.

ACTION: 

### Notice of requests submitted for review by the Office of Management and Budget.

SUMMARY: 

### The Energy Information Administration (EIA} has submitted the
energy information collection(s) listed at the end of this notice to the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) 

### for review under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

### U.S.C. Chapter 35).

The listing does not include information collection requirements contained in new or revised regulations which are to be submitted under section 3501(h) 

### of the Paperwork Reduction Act,

nor management and procurement assistance requirements collected by the Department ofEnergy (DOE}.

Each entry contains the following information: (1) 

### The sponsor of the collection (the DOE component or Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)); (21 

### collection number(s): (3)
current 0MB 

### docket number (if applicable); (4) collection tille; (5) type of request, e.g., new, revision, or extension; (6) frequency of collection: (7) 

### response obligation, i.e., mandatory, voluntary, or required to obtain or retain benefit; (8) affected public; (9) an estimate of the number of respondents
per report period; (10) 

### an estimate of the number of responses annually; (11) 

### an estimate of the average hours per response; (12) 

### the estimated total annual respondent burden, and (13) 

### a brief abstract describing the proposed collection and the respondents.