alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                         92,422
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               655,091
<PP&E>                                       2,039,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                (160,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,535,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          268,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    903,811
<COMMON>                                     5,670,510
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,241,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,535,734
<SALES>                                        183,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,908
<CGS>                                          100,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               921,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (844,012)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (844,012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (844,012)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### §3797y–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797y–2 was editorially reclassified as section 10643 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
| (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |   |   |                                                           |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| November      16, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /s/      John Paulsen                                     |
|                   |   |   |   | John      Paulsen                                              |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |

| November      16, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /s/      John Paulsen                                           |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |   |   | John      Paulsen                                                    |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer (Principal      Financial Officer) |
Case 3:08-cv-03137-SI Document 247 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-03137-SI Document 247 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2435 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron M. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron M. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYTRON M. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.87 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Yancey, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 925]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was deprived of his right to compulsory process. County Court did not preclude defendant from calling a witness; it merely precluded one area of inquiry in connection with the testimony of that witness. Thus, there is no factual basis for defendant’s contention. To the extent that defendant contends that the court’s preclusion ruling was erroneous, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review by objecting to the ruling *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We further conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence. The credibility of the witnesses was for the jury to resolve, and it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.
§ 303.21 Marking of samples, swatches, or specimens and products sold therefrom. ( a ) Where samples, swatches, or specimens of textile fiber products subject to the Act are used to promote or effect sales of such textile fiber products, the samples, swatches, or specimens, as well as the products themselves, shall be labeled to show their respective fiber contents and other required information: *Provided,* That such samples, swatches or specimens need not be labeled: ( 1 ) If the samples, swatches, or specimens are less than two square inches (12.9 cm2) in area and the information otherwise required to appear on the label is clearly, conspicuously, and non-deceptively disclosed on accompanying promotional matter in accordance with the Act and regulations.
( 2 ) If the samples, swatches, or specimens are keyed to a catalogue to which reference is necessary in order to complete the sale of the textile fiber products, and which catalogue at the necessary point of reference clearly, conspicuously, and non-deceptively discloses the information otherwise required to appear on the label in accordance with the Act and regulations; or
( 3 ) If such samples, swatches, or specimens are not used to effect sales to ultimate consumers and are not in the form intended for sale or delivery to, or for use by, the ultimate consumer, and are accompanied by an invoice or other document showing the required information.
( b ) Where properly labeled samples, swatches, or specimens are used to effect the sale of articles of wearing apparel or other household textile articles which are manufactured specifically for a particular customer after the sale is consummated, the articles of wearing apparel or other household textile articles need not be labeled if they are of the same fiber content as the samples, swatches, or specimens from which the sale was effected and an invoice or other document accompanies them showing the information otherwise required to appear on the label.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 61 FR 11544, Mar. 21, 1996; 79 FR 18771, Apr. 4, 2014]
#### Myer Rosenthal v. The United Transportation Company.

Motion for stay denied, with ten dollars costs, and temporary stay vacated. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Map 2-42

OHV Designations

Alternative 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12b-31 Omission of substantially identical documents.

In any case where two or more indentures, contracts, franchises, or other documents required to be filed as exhibits are substantially identical in all material respects except as to the parties thereto, the dates of execution, or other details, the registrant need file a copy of only one of such documents, with a schedule identifying the other documents omitted and setting forth the material details in which such documents differ from the document of which a copy is filed. The Commission may at any time in its discretion require the filing of copies of any documents so omitted.
### §300gg–15a. Provision of additional information

A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall comply with the provisions of section 18031(e)(3) of this title, except that a plan or coverage that is not offered through an Exchange shall only be required to submit the information required to the Secretary and the State insurance commissioner, and make such information available to the public.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2715A, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10101(c), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 884.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2496 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2496

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,6,9-Trioxaundecanedioic 
                                 acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,6,9-Trioxaundecanedioic 
                                 acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ON 3,6,9-TRIOXAUNDECANEDIOIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.09 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Margaret Mott, Appellant, v Evonne Goolagong, Also Known as Evonne Cawley, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 27, 1976, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Fein, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Birns .and Capozzoli, JJ.
§ 1203.735-214 Transmitting communications and gifts. ( a ) *Correspondence.* In corresponding with anyone other than the proper official of the United States with regard to the public affairs of a foreign government, an employee shall use discretion and judgment to ensure that neither the United States nor the employee will be embarrassed or placed in a compromising position (22 U.S.C. 806(a)).
( b ) *Communications.* An employee shall not act as an agent for the transmission of communications from private persons or organizations in foreign countries to the President or to Federal, State, or municipal officials in the United States. A chief of mission may, however, accept communications of this nature and forward them to the Department of State for such further action as may be appropriate, whenever the chief of mission determines it to be clearly in the public interest to do so.
( c ) *Gifts.* An employee shall not act as an agent for the transmission of gifts from persons or organizations in foreign countries to the President or to Federal, State, or municipal officials of the United States. However, principal officers may, according to regulations prescribed by the President, accept, and forward to the Office of Protocol of the Department of State, gifts made to the United States or to any political subdivision thereof by the Government to which they are accredited or from which they hold exequaturs. Employees shall not, without the approval of the Secretary of State, transmit gifts from persons or organizations in the United States to heads or other officials of foreign states.
### §3796ee–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ee–3 was editorially reclassified as section 10404 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of XP Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”),
I, Bruno Constantino Alexandre dos Santos, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2020



|/s/ Bruno Constantino Alexandre dos Santos | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Bruno Constantino Alexandre dos Santos     | 
|Chief Financial Officer                    |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. Keith Kitchen, Chief Accounting Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 11, 2004                                                     
|                                                                         
|/s/ J. KEITH KITCHEN                                                     
|J. Keith Kitchen                                                         
|Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Accounting Officer
### §300ff–140. Applicability of part

This part shall not apply in a State if the chief executive officer of the State certifies to the Secretary that the law of the State is substantially consistent with this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2695I, as added Pub. L. 111–87, §13, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2903.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as if enacted on Sept. 30, 2009, see section 2(a)(3)(B) of Pub. L. 111–87, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section note under section 300ff–11 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Petty, Chaf in and Senior Judge Annunziata

CYNTHIA GAYLE SMITH MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2215-13-1 PER CURIAM JUNE 3, 2014 MICHAEL KEITH SMITH, SR.

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS James A. Cales, Jr ., Judge Designate (Cynthia G. Smith, pro se , on brief). No brief for appellee.
Cynthia G. Smith argues that (1) “[t]he final decree of divorce entere d on October 21, 2013, as well as all of the orders ente red after March 13, 2011 are void ab initio because they were entered in a manner that violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteen th Amendment of th e United States Constitution”; and (2) “[t]he fina l decree of divorce entered on Oc tober 21, 2013, as well as the orders entered after March 13, 2011 are void ab in itio because they were products of an extrinsic fraud on the court pe rpetrated by Appellee, his attorn ey, and the trial court itself.” 1 Upon reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of th e trial court. See Rule 5A:27.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 Appellant raises additional arguments in her opening brief, but we will not consider them since they were not included in her assignments of error. See Hillcrest Manor Nursing Home v. Underwood, 35 Va. App. 31, 39 n.4, 542 S. E.2d 785, 789 n.4 (2001) (finding “an issue [was] not expressly st ated among the [assignments of error] . . . we, therefore, decline to consider [it] on appeal”).UNPUBLISHED- 2 - Appellant failed to comply w ith Rule 5A:8. Appellant did not file any transcripts or written statements of fact pursuan t to Rule 5A:8. “When the appe llant fails to ensure that the record contains transcripts or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues, any assignments of error affected by such omission shall not be considered.” Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii). We have reviewed the record and the opening brief. We conclude that transcripts or written statements of facts are indispensa ble to a determinati on of the assignments of error. See Anderson v. Commonwea lth, 13 Va. App. 506, 508-09, 413 S.E.2d 75, 76-77 (1992); Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va . App. 96, 99-100, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). Therefore, the trial court’s ruling is summarily affirmed. Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
§ 34.8 Notice and demand for payment. ( a ) STATE shall promptly hand deliver, send by first class mail to the debtor's most current address in the records of STATE, or, in appropriate circumstances, send by electronic mail to the debtor's most current address in the records of STATE, at least one written notice. Written demand under this subpart may be preceded by other appropriate actions under this part and or the FCCS, including but not limited to actions taken under the procedures applicable to administrative offset, including salary offset.
( b ) The written notice shall inform the debtor of: ( 1 ) The basis of the debt;
( 2 ) The amount of the debt;
( 3 ) The date by which payment should be made to avoid the imposition of interest, penalties and administrative costs, and the enforced collection actions described in paragraph (b)(7) of this section;
( 4 ) The applicable standards for imposing of interest, penalties and administrative costs to delinquent debts;
( 5 ) STATE's readiness to discuss alternative payment arrangements and how the debtor may offer to enter into a written agreement to repay the debt under terms acceptable to STATE;
( 6 ) The name, address and telephone number of a contact person or office within STATE;
( 7 ) STATE's intention to enforce collection by taking one or more of the following actions if the debtor fails to pay or otherwise resolve the debt: ( i ) Offset from Federal payments otherwise due to the debtor, including income tax refunds, salary, certain benefit payments, retirement, vendor payments, travel reimbursement and advances, and other Federal payments due from STATE, other Federal agencies, or through centralized disbursing from the Department of the Treasury;
( ii ) Referral to private collection agency
( iii ) Report to credit bureaus
( iv ) Administrative Wage Garnishment
( v ) Litigation by the Department of Justice
( vi ) Referral to the Financial Management Service of the Department of the Treasury for collection
( vii ) Liquidation of collateral
( viii ) Other actions as permitted by the FCCS and applicable law;
( 8 ) The debtor's right to inspect and copy records related to the debt;
( 9 ) The debtor's right to an internal review of STATE's determination that the debtor owes a debt or the amount of the debt;
( 10 ) The debtor's right, if any, to request waiver of collection of certain debts, as applicable (see § 34.18);
( 11 ) Requirement that the debtor advise STATE of any bankruptcy proceeding of the debtor; and
( 12 ) Provision for refund of amounts collected if later decision finds that the amount of the debt is not owed or is waived.
( c ) *Exceptions to notice requirements.* STATE may omit from a notice to a debtor one or more of the provisions contained in paragraphs (b)(7) through (b)(12) of this section if STATE determines that any provision is not legally required given the collection remedies to be applied to a particular debt, or which have already been provided by prior notice, applicable agreement, or contract.
[71 FR 16482, Apr. 3, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 35283, June 20, 2014]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel A. Coccoluto, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Daniel A. Coccoluto |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Daniel A. Coccoluto     |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| May 15, 2007       |   |   |

 

----