alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(i)**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Charles R. West, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tice Technology, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tice Technology,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days priorto the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the dateof our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2579 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone (EK179). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone 

(EK179). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5-CHLORO-1-INDANONE (EK179). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.47 5-Chloro-1-indanone (CAS 

No. 42348–86–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2914.39.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2579 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2549 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2549

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Red 188.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Red 188.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 188.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.83      Pigment Red 188     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 61847-48-                                                 31/2008
                         1) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3204.17.04)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §4030. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, §100225(b), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 941

Section, Pub. L. 90–448, title XIII, §1323, as added Pub. L. 108–264, title I, §104(a), June 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 722, provided funding for mitigation actions that reduce flood damages to individual properties for which 1 or more claim payments for losses have been made under flood insurance coverage under this chapter.
§ 129.10 Reports. ( a ) Any person required to register under this part (including those registered in accordance with § 129.3(d)) shall provide to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls on an annual basis a report of its brokering activities in the previous twelve months. Such report shall be submitted along with the registrant's annual renewal submission or, if not renewing, within 30 days after expiration of registration.
( b ) The report shall include brokering activities that received or were exempt from approval as follows: ( 1 ) The report shall identify the broker's name, address, and registration code and be signed by an empowered official who shall certify that the report is complete and accurate. The report shall describe each of the brokering activities, including the number assigned by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls to the approval or the exemption claimed; and
( 2 ) For each of the brokering activities, the report shall identify all persons who participated in the activities, including each person's name, address, nationality, and country where located and role or function; the quantity, description, and U.S. dollar value of the defense articles or defense services; the type and U.S. dollar value of any consideration received or expected to be received, directly or indirectly, by any person who participated in the brokering activities, and the source thereof.
( c ) If there were no brokering activities, the report shall certify that there were no such activities.
[78 FR 52694, Aug. 26, 2013]
§ 237.04 Guarantee eligibility. ( a ) Eligible Notes only are guaranteed hereunder. Notes in order to achieve Eligible Note status: ( 1 ) Must be signed on behalf of the Borrower, manually or in facsimile, by a duly authorized representative of the Borrower;
( 2 ) Must contain a certificate of authentication manually executed by the Fiscal Agent whose appointment by the Borrower is consented to by USAID in the Fiscal Agency Agreement; and
( 3 ) Shall be approved and authenticated by USAID by either: ( i ) The affixing by USAID on the Notes of a guarantee legend incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID or
( ii ) The delivery by USAID to the Fiscal Agent of a guarantee certificate incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID.
( b ) The authorized USAID representatives for purposes of the regulations in this part whose signature(s) shall be binding on USAID shall include the USAID Chief and Deputy Chief Financial Officer; Assistant Administrator and Deputy, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education, and Environment; Director and Deputy Director, Office of Development Credit; and such other individual(s) designated in a certificate executed by an authorized USAID Representative and delivered to the Fiscal Agent. The certificate of authentication of the Fiscal Agent issued pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall, when manually executed by the Fiscal Agent, be conclusive evidence binding on USAID that an Eligible Note has been duly executed on behalf of the Borrower and delivered.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Secure Identity Services Accreditation 
Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Secure Identity 
Services Accreditation Corporation (``SISAC'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: The Secure 
Identity Services Accreditation Corporation, Washington, DC. The nature 
and scope of SISAC's standards development activities are: to adopt 
voluntary standards for the real estate finance industry in cooperation 
with mortgage lenders, government-sponsored enterprises (``GSEs''), and 
other organizations to set minimum standards for Public Key 
Infrastructure (``PKI''), other electronic authentication methods and 
secure identity providers.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27540 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 518.62 Enforcement. ( a ) Remedies for noncompliance. If a recipient materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an award, whether stated in a Federal statute, regulation, assurance, application, or notice of award, the Federal awarding agency may, in addition to imposing any of the special conditions outlined in § 518.14, take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances. ( 1 ) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the recipient or more severe enforcement action by the Federal awarding agency.
( 2 ) Disallow (that is, deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance.
( 3 ) Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the current award.
( 4 ) Without further awards for the project or program.
( 5 ) Take other remedies that may be legally available.
( b ) Hearings and appeals. In taking an enforcement action, the awarding agency shall provide the recipient an opportunity for hearing, appeal, or other administrative proceeding to which the recipient is entitled under any statute or regulation applicable to the action involved.
( c ) Effects of suspension and termination. Costs of a recipient resulting from obligations incurred by the recipient during a suspension or after termination of an award are not allowable unless the awarding agency expressly authorizes them in the notice of suspension or termination or subsequently. Other recipient costs during suspension or after termination which are necessary and not reasonably avoidable are allowable if the conditions in paragraphs (c) (1) or (2) of this section apply. ( 1 ) The costs result from obligations which were properly incurred by the recipient before the effective date of suspension or termination, are not in anticipation of it, and in the case of a termination, are noncancellable.
( 2 ) The costs would be allowable if the award were not suspended or expired normally at the end of the funding period in which the termination takes effect.
( d ) Relationship to debarment and suspension. The enforcement remedies identified in this section, including suspension and termination, do not preclude a recipient from being subject to debarment and suspension under E.O.s 12549 and 12689 and the Federal awarding agency implementing regulations (see § 518.13).
§ 1002.5 Records available at the Foundation. The General Counsel's Office will make available, to the extent not authorized to be withheld, the following works or classes of information: ( a ) A copy of Agency regulations, including a copy of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or of any other title of the Code in which Agency regulations may have been published;
( b ) Final unclassified reports;
( c ) Copies of grants, loans, or other agreements in force;
( d ) Personnel information affecting the public;
( e ) Procurement information affecting the public;
( f ) Contracts;
( g ) Reimbursable agreements with other agencies.
[37 FR 8375, Apr. 26, 1972, as amended at 71 FR 63236, Oct. 30, 2006]
Contact Us

#   Cleaning Up Our Land, Water and Air

          -                  Information for Communities      
EPA conducts investigation and cleanups when oil or hazardous chemicals have been released.
 

Accidents, spills, leaks, and improper disposal and handling of hazardous materials have created tens of thousands of sites nationally, contaminating land, water (groundwater and surface water), and air (indoor and outdoor). Assessments and cleanups may be done by EPA, other federal agencies, states or municipalities, or the company or party responsible for the contamination. 

              -  What you can do to engage with cleanups
Cleanups benefit from community.
Get involved 
              -  Cleanup laws and regulations
Regulatory information on Resources Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action, Superfund, brownfields, underground storage tanks, and emergency response. 
See the guidance 
              -  Science and Technology
Site clean-up information (CLU-IN), vendor directory, and site info for remediation technology, characterization and corrective action.
Inform yourself 
              -  News
Updates from EPA's cleanup programs.
Read up 
              -  Partners
EPA works with, local, state, Tribal and federal government agencies, businesses, non-profits and educational institutions. ​​​​
Find contacts 
              -  Related Links
Hotlines and information centers.
View related info 

##         Cleanups in your Community          

##         Related Information          

                        - Communicating Risks from Contaminated Sites
                        - Emergency Response
                        - Superfund
                        - Cleanups at Federal Facilities
                        - RCRA Corrective Action
                        - Brownfields
                        - Underground Storage Tanks
                        - Oil Spills

Contact Us
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03 - 0 2 - 00 559 - CR NO. 03 - 02 - 00560 - CR
Rosalee Cunningham

, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 45,518 & 45,850 , HONORABLE JOE CARROLL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In number 03

- 02

- 00559

- CR, appellant Rosalee Cunningham appeals from judgments of conviction for theft of over $750 and misapplying more than $200 of fiduciary funds, both of which were
third

- degree felonies when the offenses were committed. Act of May 23, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 565,

' ' 1, 2, 1991 Tex. Gen. Laws 2003, 2003

- 04 (Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' ' 31.03 (e)(4)(A), 32.45(c)(2), since amended). In number 03

- 02

- 00560

- CR, she appeals from a judgment of conviction for theft of over $20,000, a second

- degree felony. Id . (Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 31.03(e)(5)(B), since amended) . In both causes, the adjudications of guilt followed the revocation of deferred adjudication community supervision for nonpayment of restitution and costs. Appellant contends the revocations were an abuse of discretion because she was unable to pay the required amounts.2 Upon the filing of a motion to proceed to adjudication, A [t]he defendant is entitled to a hearing limited to the determination by the court of whether it proceeds with an adj udication of guilt on the original charge. No appeal may be taken from this determination. @ Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12,

' 5(b) (West Supp. 2003). Under the express terms of the statute, a defendant whose deferred adjudication supervision has been revoked and who has been adjudicated guilty may not raise on appeal any claim of error in the adjudication process. Connolly v. State , 983 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Williams v. State , 592 S.W.2d 931, 932

- 33 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Garcia v. State , 45 S.W.3d 740, 742 (Tex. App. C Austin 2001, pet. ref = d). After adjudication, all proceedings, including assessment of punishment and sentencing, continue as if adjudication had not been deferred. Art. 42.12, ' 5(b). A defendant may appeal issues arising after ad judication. Williams , 592 S.W.2d at 932. Because the alleged errors are not appealable, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mack Kidd, Justice Before Jus tices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: April 24, 2003 Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VERNELL HOLLAND NICKENS, IV,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 466 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Burton N. Pugach v. Isidore Dollinger.

Motion for an order compelling the District Attorney, Bronx County, to move to resettle the judgment of the County Court, Bronx County, rendered on March 14, 1962 denied. Motion for an order compelling the District Attorney, Bronx County, to dismiss indictment and for other relief denied. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32(i)

Certification

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

OF
ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2006



/s/ W. Scott McDonaldW. Scott McDonald, Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2006



/s/ Sharon L. DraperSharon L. Draper, Chief Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 511.8 Limitations. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of section 2401(b) of title 28 of the United States Code, a tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless presented in writing to the Board within two (2) years after such claim accrues.
( b ) A suit may not be filed until the claim shall have been finally denied by the Board. Failure of the Board to make final disposition of the claim within six (6) months after it has been presented shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of the Act and of this part.
( c ) A suit shall not be filed for a sum greater than the amount of the claim presented to the Board, except where the increased amount is based upon newly discovered evidence not reasonably discoverable at the time for presenting the claim to the Board, or upon allegation and proof of intervening facts, relating to amount of the claim.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Pellicano, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. The court has made an independent examination of the record on appeal. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court—criminal possession stolen property, first degree.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Denman and Witmer, JJ.