alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Fleetclean Systems Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer an principal financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
May 16, 2003



<PAGE>
#### Elayne Sklar, Respondent, v Jordan J. Sklar, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 20, 1976, as directed him to pay plaintiff the sum of $10,000 for counsel fees and expenses. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The sum awarded as counsel fees reflects a proper exercise of discretion under subdivision (a) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §19303. Clean energy technology transfer coordination

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Chief Commercialization Officer established in section 16391(a) of this title, shall support the coordination of relevant technology transfer programs that advance the commercial application of clean energy technologies nationally and across all energy sectors. In particular, the Secretary may support activities to—

(1) facilitate the sharing of information on best practices for successful operation of clean energy technology transfer programs;

(2) coordinate resources and improve cooperation among clean energy technology transfer programs;

(3) facilitate connections between entrepreneurs and start-up companies and the variety of programs related to clean energy technology transfer under the Department; and

(4) facilitate the development of metrics to measure the impact of clean energy technology transfer programs on—

(A) advancing the development, demonstration, and commercial application of clean energy technologies;

(B) increasing the competitiveness of United States in the clean energy sector, including in manufacturing; and

(C) commercial application of clean energy technologies being developed by entrepreneurs from under-represented backgrounds.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the activities in this section $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10715, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1703.)
Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

February 8, 2012

Mr. Hans Mostert

MC 03-56

The Boeing Company

PO Box 3707

Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Mr. Mostert:

We have received your petition (letter no. RA-12-00504), on behalf of The Boeing 

Company, requesting an exemption from § 25.841(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulation. This exemption, if granted, would permit relief from the requirements of 

airplane cabin-pressure altitudes relative to maximum altitude-descent times required in the 

event of cabin depressurization as the result of an uncontained engine failure.

Your petition has been added to public docket no. FAA-2008-0826 and is being processed. 

We will contact you if we need additional information.

We will advise you of our final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have 

questions in the meantime, you may call Steve Happenny at (425) 227-2147, e-mail 

stephen.happenny@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

Mark Forseth

Standardization Branch

Transport Airplane Directorate

Federal Aviation Administration
### §§4481 to 4485. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–288, title VII, §703, formerly title VI, §603, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 164; renumbered title VII, §703, Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(1), (2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3100

Section 4481, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §251, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1757, related to repair and restoration of damaged United States facilities.

Section 4482, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §252, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1757; Pub. L. 93–251 title I, §45(a), Mar. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 24, related to restoration of State and local public facilities.

Section 4483, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §253, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1758, related to priority to applications for public facility and public housing assistance in major disaster areas.

Section 4484, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §254, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1758, related to relocation assistance.

Section 4485, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §255, as added Pub. L. 92–209, §1, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 742, related to private medical care facilities grants for repair, reconstruction, or replacement of damaged or destroyed facilities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1974, see section 605 of Pub. L. 93–288, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 5121 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Williams, Also Known as Willie Williams, Also Known as Robert Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 3, 1975 (the date on the clerk’s extract is April 4, 1975), convicting him of attempted murder and possession of *851weapons, etc., as a felony (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of possession of weapons, etc., as a felony (under count three of Indictment No. 2961/1972), and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts of this case, the defendant-appellant could not have committed the crime of attempted murder without having also been guilty of the crime of possession of weapons, etc. (a black handgun), as charged in count three of Indictment No. 2961/1972. Therefore, the defendant’s conviction under the said count must be reversed; that count is concurrent to, and included within, the count which charged attempted murder (see CPL 300.40, subd 4; *People v Grier,*37 NY2d 847; *People v Fluker,*54 AD2d 738). We have examined the defendant’s other arguments for reversal and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
19, 2009





/s/
George Morris


George Morris


Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 66 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 66 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 66 Filed 05/28/10 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document 87 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 4 Case3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document86 Filed01/18/10 Page1 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document 87 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 4 Case3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document86 Filed01/18/10 Page2 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document 87 Filed 01/19/10 Page 3 of 4 Case3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document86 Filed01/18/10 Page3 of 4
Case3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document86 Filed01/18/10 Page4 of 4

January 19, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-03927-WHA Document 87 Filed 01/19/10 Page 4 of 4
#### § 221.22 No acceleration of Eligible Notes.

Eligible Notes shall not be subject to acceleration by A.I.D., the Noteholder or any other party.
Exhibit 32.2





Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Philip Rydzewski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




June 3, 2011
By:
/s/ PHILIP RYDZEWSKIPhilip RydzewskiChief Financial Officer
222 A.2d 779

#### Jacqueline Craven *vs.*United States Rubber Company.

OCTOBER 14, 1966.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin and Kelleher, JJ.

*335
      *Abedon, Michaelson, Stanzler and Biener, Richard A. Skolnik,*for petitioner.

*Carroll, Kelly & Murphy, Ambrose W. Carroll,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

The appeal of the petitioner herein from the decree of the workmen’s compensation commission dated May 28, 1965 is denied and dismissed on the ground that said workmen’s compensation commission was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the employee’s petition for medical expenses, and all findings of fact set out therein, other than the finding that the commission was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the petition, are null and void.

The appeal of the petitioner is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed as modified in this opinion, and the cause is remanded to the workmen’s compensation commission for further proceedings.
### §3716. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3716 was editorially reclassified as section 30503 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §4703(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2836, which defined terms, was editorially reclassified as section 30502 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §285a–5. Associate Director for Prevention; appointment; function

(a) There shall be in the Institute an Associate Director for Prevention to coordinate and promote the programs in the Institute concerning the prevention of cancer. The Associate Director shall be appointed by the Director of the Institute from individuals who because of their professional training or experience are experts in public health or preventive medicine.

(b) The Associate Director for Prevention shall prepare for inclusion in the biennial report made under section 284b 1 of this title a description of the prevention activities of the Institute, including a description of the staff and resources allocated to those activities.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §416, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 836.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 284b of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §104(b)(1)(C), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3693.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Jeanette Victor, Plaintiff, v General Interlease Corp., Appellant-Respondent; Phoenix Candy Co. et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) defendant General Interlease Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 1977, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment and (2) defendants Super Novelty Candy Co. and Phoenix Candy Co. cross-appeal from the balance of the order, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Brownstein at Special Term. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Tonina Snyder, Respondent, v Bradley Snyder, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 154]

Spain, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Mizel, J.), entered April 22, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court article d, to hold respondent in willful violation of a prior support order.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to hold respondent in contempt of an order issued by the Family Court of the Second Circuit of Hawaii, pursuant to which respondent is obligated to pay child support to petitioner in the amount of $56.30 per week and contribute an additional $7.80 per week for their son’s health insurance. After fact-finding and confirmation hearings on the willfulness of respondent’s conceded violation of the order, Family Court confirmed the findings of the Hearing Officer that respondent had willfully violated the support order and incarcerated respondent for six months. Respondent now appeals from the order of confirmation.

We affirm. Respondent concedes that he violated the order and, therefore, that petitioner met her initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of willful violation *(see, Matter of Powers v Powers,*86 NY2d 63, 69; *Matter of Laeyt v Laeyt,*256 AD2d 743, 744 ). The burden then shifted to respondent to offer “some competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments” *(Matter of Powers v Powers, supra,*at 69-70). However, respondent did not demonstrate an inability to pay. To the contrary, at the hearing respondent admitted that he was employed at various times during the period at issue. He offered only “conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions regarding his alleged inability to pay” *(Matter of Tarbell v Tarbell,*241 AD2d 702, 703) and no competent medical proof that he was unable to obtain employment *(see, Nickerson v Bellinger,*258 AD2d 688, 688-689). Indeed, on appeal *735respondent relies exclusively on his history of cocaine dependence and alcohol abuse as impediments to his ability to maintain regular employment. To the extent that this explanation is even properly considered *(cf., Matter of Crystal v Corwin,*274 AD2d 683, 684), it neither explains nor justifies respondent’s decision to place his own alleged expenses ahead of his obligation to support his son *(see, Matter of Powers v Powers, supra,*at 70).

Crew III, J. P., Carpinello, Graffeo and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
### §3514a. Nonrecurring expenses fund

There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the "Nonrecurring expenses fund" (the Fund): Provided, That unobligated balances of expired discretionary funds appropriated in this or any succeeding fiscal year from the General Fund of the Treasury to the Department of Health and Human Services by this or any other Act may be transferred (not later than the end of the fifth fiscal year after the last fiscal year for which such funds are available for the purposes for which appropriated) into the Fund: Provided further, That amounts deposited in the Fund shall be available until expended, and in addition to such other funds as may be available for such purposes, for capital acquisition necessary for the operation of the Department, including facilities infrastructure and information technology infrastructure, subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget: Provided further, That amounts in the Fund may be obligated only after the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate are notified at least 15 days in advance of the planned use of funds.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. G, title II, §223, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2188; Pub. L. 111–8, div. F, title II, §220, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 783.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–8 substituted "in this or any succeeding" for "for this or any succeeding".
### §3216. Employment of expediters and administrative employees

Assistance shall not be provided by the Secretary under this chapter to any business unless the owners, partners, or officers of the business—

(1) certify to the Secretary the names of any attorneys, agents, and other persons engaged by or on behalf of the business for the purpose of expediting applications made to the Secretary for assistance of any kind, under this chapter, and the fees paid or to be paid to the person for expediting the applications; and

(2) execute an agreement binding the business, for the 2-year period beginning on the date on which the assistance is provided by the Secretary to the business, to refrain from employing, offering any office or employment to, or retaining for professional services, any person who, on the date on which the assistance or any part of the assistance was provided, or within the 1-year period ending on that date—

(A) served as an officer, attorney, agent, or employee of the Department; and

(B) occupied a position or engaged in activities that the Secretary determines involved discretion with respect to the granting of assistance under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title VI, §606, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3615.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3216, Pub. L. 89–136, title VII, §706, Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 573, defined terms as used in this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(b)(3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2537 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2537

 To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments and dyes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments and dyes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND DYES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain organic pigments and 
dyes) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 196.4 Administering office.

The Department of State's Bureau of Human Resources, Office of Recruitment is responsible for administering the Thomas R. Pickering Foreign Affairs/Graduate Foreign Affairs Fellowship Program and grants to post-secondary institutions and may be contacted for more detailed information.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James J. Long, Jr., Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George W. Kahler, Jr., Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nelson Troche, Appellant.

[In each action] Motion for an enlargement of time within which to perfect appeal. Motion granted and time is extended to the March 1961 Term of this court.
### _____________

AMERIFLIGHT, LLC

1515 W 20 th Street

DFW Airport, TX 75261

( 954) 701 7807 PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF AMERIFLIGHT, LLC EXEMPTION 9770

This petition follows the requirements for inclusion in such documents set forth in the

order presented in 14 CFR Part 11.81

(a) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact inform ation such as a

fax number, telephone number, or e

- mail address;

Mr. Richard M. Anderson

Vice President, Operations

Ameriflight, LLC

1515 W 20 th Street

DFW Airport, TX 75261

954 701 7807

manderson@ameriflig ht.com

(b) The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption;

14 CFR Parts 135.85

(c) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief;

To allow Ameriflight , LLC and its pilots to transport FAA

- certified airm an who are

employed as flight crew members by another Part 121 or 135 certificate holder without

complying with certain Part 135 passenger

- carrying requirements. This is a renewal of

Ameriflight exemption 8396

(d) The reasons why granting your request wou ld be in the public interest; that is, how it

would benefit the public as a whole;

There is no change to the reasons that this is in the public interest since last renewal.

(e) The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, o r how

the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule

from which you seek the exemption;

There is no change to the safety aspects since last renewal

(f) A summary we can publish in the Federal Register, stating:

(1) The rule from which you seek the exemption;

### _____________

AMERIFLIGHT, LLC

1515 W 20 th Street

DFW Airport, TX 75261

( 954) 701 7807 14 CFR Parts 135.85

(2) A brief description of the nature of the exemption you seek;

To allow Ameriflight , LLC and its pilots to transport FAA

- certified airman who are

employed as flight crew members by a nother Part 121 or 135 certificate holder without

complying with certain Part 135 passenger

- carrying requirements. This is a renewal of

Ameriflight exemption 8396

(g) Any additional information, views or arguments availa ble to support your request;

No a dditional support since last renewal.

(h) If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the United States,

the reason why you need to do so.

The same rationale for allowing this exemption within the United States applies for

outside t he United States.