alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 431 

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. JORDAN, and Mr. NUGENT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of 

Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31(2)) is repealed. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 431 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1) 

2 of such Act is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

6 and 

7 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

8 of this subsection’’. 

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

11 take effect on December 31, 2012. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         105,131
<SECURITIES>                                    98,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,134
<PP&E>                                          63,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,204
<BONDS>                                         13,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       581,728
<OTHER-SE>                                    (364,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,596
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (115,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (115,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (115,805)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.02)
        

</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No. 08-cv-01327-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

31512408 

BRUCE G. VANYO (SBN: 60134) 

EMAIL: bruce.vanyo@kattenlaw.com 

RICHARD H. ZELICHOV (SBN: 193858) 

EMAIL: richard.zelichov@kattenlaw.com 

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3012 

Telephone: 310.788.4400 

Facsimile: 310.788.4471 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Camtek, Ltd., Rafi Amit, Ronit Dulberg, 

Yotam Stern, and Moshe Amit 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

YUVAL LAPINER, Individually and on 

Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

CAMTEK, LTD., RAFI AMIT, RONIT 

DULBERG, YOTAM STERN and MOSHE 

AMIT 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 08-cv-01327-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:08-cv-01327-MMC Document 93 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

No. 08-cv-01327-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

31512408 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 19, 2010 shall be 

continued until April 23, 2010. 

Dated: January ___, 2010 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-01327-MMC Document 93 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No. 08-cv-01327-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

31512408 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within action; my business address is Katten, Muchin Rosenman LLP, 2029 

Century Park East, Suite 2600, Los Angeles, California 90067. 

On January 26, 2010, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on all interested parties in this action: 

[ X ] (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I am personally and readily familiar with the firm’s 

practice of collection and processing of document(s) to be transmitted electronically in Portable 

Document Format (PDF) and I certify that I caused the foregoing document on this date to be filed 

electronically with the Clerk of the Court through ECF. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose 

direction the service was made. 

Executed on January 26, 2010, at Los Angeles, California. 

 /s/ 

 Yuval M. Rogson 

Case 3:08-cv-01327-MMC Document 93 Filed 01/28/10 Page 3 of 3
### §280g–18. Maternal mental health hotline

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall maintain, by grant or contract, a national maternal mental health hotline to provide emotional support, information, brief intervention, and mental health and substance use disorder resources to pregnant and postpartum women at risk of, or affected by, maternal mental health and substance use disorders, and to their families or household members.

#### (b) Requirements for hotline

The hotline under subsection (a) shall—

(1) be a 24/7 real-time hotline;

(2) provide voice and text support;

(3) be staffed by certified peer specialists, licensed health care professionals, or licensed mental health professionals who are trained on—

(A) maternal mental health and substance use disorder prevention, identification, and intervention; and

(B) providing culturally and linguistically appropriate support; and

(4) provide maternal mental health and substance use disorder assistance and referral services to meet the needs of underserved populations, individuals with disabilities, and family and household members of pregnant or postpartum women at risk of experiencing maternal mental health and substance use disorders.

#### (c) Additional requirements

In maintaining the hotline under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

(1) consult with the Domestic Violence Hotline, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, and Veterans Crisis Line to ensure that pregnant and postpartum women are connected in real-time to the appropriate specialized hotline service, when applicable;

(2) conduct a public awareness campaign for the hotline;

(3) consult with Federal departments and agencies, including the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs, to increase awareness regarding the hotline; and

(4) consult with appropriate State, local, and Tribal public health officials, including officials who administer programs that serve low-income pregnant and postpartum individuals.

#### (d) Annual report

The Secretary shall submit an annual report to the Congress on the hotline under subsection (a) and implementation of this section, including—

(1) an evaluation of the effectiveness of activities conducted or supported under subsection (a);

(2) a directory of entities or organizations to which staff maintaining the hotline funded under this section may make referrals; and

(3) such additional information as the Secretary determines appropriate.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §399V–7, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1112, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5643.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,399
<SECURITIES>                                    17,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,692
<INVENTORY>                                        779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,889
<PP&E>                                           3,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,158
<SALES>                                          5,569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,413
<CGS>                                            1,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   347
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (771)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### Murray Jacobs et al., Respondents, v. Frances Lewicki, Appellant.

In an action to establish by prescription a driveway easement over a portion of defendant’s property and to enjoin interference with such easement, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 22, 1960, after a nonjury trial, declaring the existence of such easement and directing defendant to remove a fence erected by her in the driveway. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Findings of fact insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. The parties are owners of adjoining properties, on each of which is a dwelling with a garage in the rear. Between the dwellings is an unpaved driveway 19.27 feet in width, of which 8.39 feet is on plaintiffs’ property and 10.88 feet is on defendant’s property. In our opinion, the evidence does not establish reciprocal adverse user by the adjoining landowners, or that the use of the disputed portion of the driveway by plaintiffs and their predecessors in title was adverse and under a claim of right *(Kopp*v. *Niemetz,*11 A D 2d 739; *Norwick*v. *Edelman,*204 Misc. 915, 917, and cases cited). Nor can plaintiffs “tack” their alleged adverse user of 13% years onto that of their predecessors in title to make up the required 15 years, since the deed to plaintiffs does not contain the alleged driveway easement, and there is no proof that their grantor intended to include such easement therein *(Melbourne*v. *Kukla,*237 App. Div. 834; *Rogoff*v. *Vanderbilt Sons’ Corp.,*263 App. Div. 841, affd. 290 N. Y. 666; *Van Roo*v. *Van Roo,*268 App. Div. 170, 175, affd. 294 N. Y. 731; *Meerhoff*v. *Rouse,*4 A D 2d 740). Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., concurs in the result. [24 Misc 2d 726.]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00436-CV

NAVID, INC. AND NADER 

DARYAPAYMA

APPELLANTS

V.

INLAND WESTERN EULESS 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s 

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: June 30, 2011
EX-10.2 Subsidiaries of the Company






Exhibit 10.2




Subsidiaries of the Company




	 	 	 
	 	 	State or Other Jurisdiction of
	Name of Subsidiary	 	Incorporation or Organization
	Idenix (Massachusetts) Inc.
	 	Massachusetts
	Idenix Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.*
	 	Italy
	Idenix (Cayman) Limited
	 	Cayman Islands
	Idenix SARL**
	 	France








	 	 	 
	*	 	Wholly-owned by Idenix SARL
	 
	**	 	Wholly-owned by Idenix (Cayman) Limited
### §3058j. State legal assistance development

A State agency shall provide the services of an individual who shall be known as a State legal assistance developer, and the services of other personnel, sufficient to ensure—

(1) State leadership in securing and maintaining the legal rights of older individuals;

(2) State capacity for coordinating the provision of legal assistance;

(3) State capacity to provide technical assistance, training, and other supportive functions to area agencies on aging, legal assistance providers, ombudsmen, and other persons, as appropriate;

(4) State capacity to promote financial management services to older individuals at risk of conservatorship;

(5) State capacity to assist older individuals in understanding their rights, exercising choices, benefiting from services and opportunities authorized by law, and maintaining the rights of older individuals at risk of guardianship; and

(6) State capacity to improve the quality and quantity of legal services provided to older individuals.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title VII, §731, as added Pub. L. 106–501, title VII, §706, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3058j, Pub. L. 89–73, title VII, §731, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title VII, §704, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1285, related to State elder rights and legal assistance development, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–501, title VII, §706, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2291.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 12350          Edition: 60          Edition Date: August 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 10/8/2011     LNM - 9/27/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
§ 192.1 Declarations of hostile action. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary of State shall declare when and where individuals in the Civil Service of the United States, including members of the Foreign Service and foreign service nationals, or a citizen, national or resident alien of the United States rendering personal services to the United States similar to the service of an individual in the Civil Service, have been placed in captive status commencing on or after November 4, 1979, for purposes of § 192.11(b) or January 21, 1981, for all other purposes under this part, which arises because of hostile action abroad and is a result of the individual's relationship with the U.S. Government as provided in the Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act, codified in 5 U.S.C. 5569 and 5570 and Executive Order 12598.
( 2 ) The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall also declare when and where individuals in the Civil Service of the United States including members of the Foreign Service and foreign service nationals, including individuals rendering personal services to the United States similar to the service of an individual in the Civil Service, and family members of these individuals are eligible to receive compensation for disability or death occurring after January 21, 1981. Such determination shall be based on the decision by the Secretary of State that the disability or death was caused by hostile action abroad and was a result of the individual's relationship with the Government.
( 3 ) Declarations of hostile action in domestic situations shall be made by the Secretary of State in consultation with the Attorney General of the United States and the head of the employing agency or agencies.
( b ) The Secretary of State for actions abroad, or Agency Head for domestic actions, upon his or her own initiative, or upon application under § 192.2 shall determine which individuals in captive or missing status as so declared shall be considered captives eligible for benefits under the Act. The Secretary or Agency Head shall also determine who is eligible under the Act for benefits as a member of a family or household of a captive. The determination of the Secretary or Agency Head shall be final for purposes of determining captive status and cash payments, and not subject to judicial review, but any interested person may request reconsideration on the basis of information not considered at the time of original determination. The criteria for determination are set forth in sections 5569 and 5570 of title 5 of U.S.C., and in these regulations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. Change Time (C 08-3544 CRB (PR))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

QUILLIE L. HARVEY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. PONDER, et al.,

Defendants.

C 08-3544 CRB (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CHANGE 

TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION

Defendants Evans, Hedgpeth, Ponder, and Celaya (Defendants) have filed a request for an 

extension of time of time of sixty days, up to and including, July 9, 2010, in which to file a 

dispositive motion. This Court has reviewed Defendant’s request and the declaration of Brendan 

M. Kenny, and finds good cause to GRANT the request. Accordingly, Defendant has until July 

9, 2010 to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than August 9, 

2010. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen days after Plaintiff’s opposition brief 

is filed with the Court.

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

May 13, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:08-cv-03544-CRB Document 41 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. Change Time (C 08-3544 CRB (PR))

Case 3:08-cv-03544-CRB Document 41 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Jerome BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40532

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 18, 2007.

James O. Jenkins, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bryan Sperry Laine, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appointed counsel for Edward Jerome Butler has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Butler has filed a response, in which he raises claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We conclude that the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration on direct appeal of Butler’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See United States v. Brewster,*137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir.1998).

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Butler’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Quantum Exhibit 4.1







Exhibit 4.1 








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  



We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statement on Form F-80 (the “Registration
Statement”) of First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) of our
auditors’ report dated March 15, 2005, on the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the consolidated statements of
operations and deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. 



We also consent to the references to
us under the headings “Experts” and “Documents Filed as part of the
Registration Statement” in the Registration Statement. 







/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLP 
Chartered Accountants  







Vancouver, British Columbia

February 2, 2006