alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §285c–8. Nutritional disorders program

#### (a) Establishment

The Director of the Institute, in consultation with the Director of NIH, shall establish a program of conducting and supporting research, training, health information dissemination, and other activities with respect to nutritional disorders, including obesity.

#### (b) Support of activities

In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Director of the Institute shall conduct and support each of the activities described in such subsection.

#### (c) Dissemination of information

In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Director of the Institute shall carry out activities to facilitate and enhance knowledge and understanding of nutritional disorders, including obesity, on the part of health professionals, patients, and the public through the effective dissemination of information.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §434, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title VI, §601[(a)], June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 161.)
#### § 225.122 Use of Federal funds.

Federal funds administered by a Federal department or agency may not be expended for research involving human subjects unless the requirements of this policy have been satisfied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2478 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2478

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.87.14      Baby carriers,      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         chain adjustors,                                                   31/2008
                         chain covers,
                         mechanical grips
                         with 7/8"
                         internal
                         diameter, air
                         horns, wide-angle
                         reflectors,
                         plastic saddle
                         covers, safety
                         pads, chain
                         tensioners, toe
                         clips, head sets,
                         seat posts, all
                         the foregoing for
                         chief use on
                         bicycles
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8714.99.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. William Robinson.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water levels and artesianpressure in observation wells in the United States. Part 5, Northwesternstates.**
 
1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949
1950 | 1951 | 1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104681
 
August 22, 2019
#### Dorothy Garrow, Respondent, v Daniel B. Garrow, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Onondaga County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order committing him to the Onondaga County Correctional Facility for a term of six months for violating an order of protection. At the hearing for violation of such order, although the court informed respondent that he could be represented by an attorney, he was neither informed of his right to have an adjournment to confer with counsel nor informed of his right to have counsel assigned if he was financially unable to obtain one (Family Ct Act, §262). In light of all the circumstances disclosed in the record we find that respondent should have been clearly informed of his right to representation at the hearing. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Family Court—contempt.) Present —Moule, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.
### §§2671 to 2674. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2671, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §131, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1317, which related to authorization of appropriations, was transferred to former section 6061 of this title.

A prior section 2671, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §131, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 286; Pub. L. 90–170, §3(a), Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 528, authorized appropriations through fiscal year ending June 30, 1970, for grants for construction of mental retardation facilities.

Section 2672, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §132, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1317, which related to allotments to States, was transferred to former section 6062 of this title.

A prior section 2672, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §132, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 286; Pub. L. 89–105, §2(a), Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 427; Pub. L. 90–170, §3(c), Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 528, authorized allotments to States, transfers of allotments between States, and adjustment of allotments to a State for construction of facilities for mentally retarded.

Section 2673, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §133, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1318, which related to the National Advisory Council on Services and Facilities for the Developmentally Disabled, was transferred to former section 6007 of this title.

A prior section 2673, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §133, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 287, provided that within six months after Oct. 31, 1963, the Secretary, after consultation with the Federal Hospital Council, prescribe to the States (1) what constitutes adequate services for mentally retarded persons, (2) the method of determining priority of projects, (3) standards of construction and equipment, and (4) that the State plan provide adequate facilities for the mentally retarded including persons unable to pay therefor.

Section 2674, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §133, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1319, which related to State plans, was transferred to former section 6063 of this title.

A prior section 2674, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §134, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 287; Pub. L. 90–170, §5, Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 530, provided for submission to the Secretary of State plans for his approval, set out conditions for approval, and required notice and hearing before final disapproval.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-30663

_____________________

LIFECARE HOSPITALS INC

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRIDEN HOTEL CO; ET AL 

Defendants

FRIDEN HOTEL CO; R E HARRINGTON INC

Defendants-Appellants

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-cv-1313)

_________________________________________________________________

March 6, 1997

Before REAVLEY, KING, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court correctly concluded that the preemption

issue in this case is controlled by our decision in Memorial

Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Ins. Co., 904 F.2d 236 (5th

Cir. 1990). Further, the district court correctly held that

under the evidence presented the defendants owed a duty to the

plaintiff to supply it with correct information regarding the
2

benefits available to Ms. Griffin, that the defendants breached

that duty as a result of their negligence and that the plaintiff

was damaged as a result of the defendants’ negligent

misrepresentations. The factual findings made by the district

court in this connection are not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Lamont Holliday, Appellant, v. Paul D. McGinnis, as Commissioner of Correction for the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the November Term, beginning October 22, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion by appellant for assignment of counsel denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE CARPIAUX,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CITY OF EMERYVILLEREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))

No. C08-4347 BZ

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties to this matter having advised the Court that

they have agreed to a settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and all scheduled

matters are VACATED; provided, however, that any party may,

within 60 Days of the date of this Order, move the Court to

restore this matter to the calendar on the grounds that the

settlement has not been consummated.

Dated: April 1, 2010

    Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\CARPIAUX C. CITY OF EMERYVILLE\ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04347-BZ   Document 53   Filed 04/01/10   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,399,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,443,345
<PP&E>                                      31,852,222
<DEPRECIATION>                               (657,651)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,705,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,591
<BONDS>                                      9,651,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,921,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,705,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               885,397
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                559,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            559,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   559,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CHEMSYSTEMS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0911 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On November 23, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On November 6, 2012, Chemsystems, Inc. (hereinafter 

"Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing. 

On September 4, 2014, Respondent asked to withdrawn its Request for Hearing. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearingand the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed request to withdraw Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's request to withdraw its Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and · 

2. This proceeding be and is herebydismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LISTBY US. MAIL & FAX 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Nancy Meikle, President 

ChemSystems, Inc., Respondent 

1 0 1 0 1 Genard Road 

Houston, TX 77041 

Robert Fling, Respondent's Counsel 

S. Robert Fling, PLLC. 

P.O. Box 411, Katy, TX 77492 

5518 Fifth Street, Suite C 

Katy, TX 77493 

TEL: 281-391-2003 

FAX: 281-727-0082 

ONE COPY 

Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0911 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2WI 000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
§ 1421.11 Party. *Party* means ( a ) any person: ( 1 ) Filing a charge, petition, or request;
( 2 ) named in a charge, complaint, petition, or request;
( 3 ) whose intervention in a proceeding has been permitted or directed by the Board;
( 4 ) who participated as a party ( i ) in a matter that was decided by an agency head under 22 U.S.C. 4105 or
( ii ) in a matter where action by the Grievance Board was taken; and
( b ) the General Counsel, or the General Counsel's designated representative, in appropriate proceedings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISA CANDEE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C08-4384 MHP (BZ)

ORDER SETTING FURTHER

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

In light of the explanation defendant provided in its

response to the order to show cause, and in particular the

apparent failure by plaintiff to have made a timely settlement

demand, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The order to show cause is DISCHARGED and the hearing

scheduled for January 6, 2010 is VACATED. 

2. A further settlement conference is scheduled for

Friday, January 22, 2010 at 9:15 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th

Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California 94102. Defendant shall be represented

by its Chief Executive Officer or any person to whom the Chief

Executive Officer delegates “unlimited” authority, using

Case 3:08-cv-04384-MHP Document 56 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant’s term, to negotiate a settlement within the ranges

discussed at the prior settlement conference. 

3. Plaintiff shall attend with her counsel.

4. No further settlement conference statements need be

filed unless there have been intervening events which either

side believes the Court needs to be aware of prior to the

conference.

Dated: January 4, 2010

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\REFS.2010\CANDEE ORD SCHEDULING FURTHER SETT CONF.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04384-MHP Document 56 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                      2,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,619
<PP&E>                                          85,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,319
<BONDS>                                         27,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,043
<SALES>                                         20,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,302
<CGS>                                           13,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                       493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT









|1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2019 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as
            seller, servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2019-A, as issuer, and I have made, or have
            caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all
            material respects during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March 25, 2022




By:  /s/ Ole Jensen


Name:  Ole Jensen


Title:  Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
### §300d–19. Failure to comply with agreements

#### (a) Repayment of payments

#### (1) Requirement

The Secretary may, in accordance with subsection (b), require a State to repay any payments received by the State pursuant to section 300d–11(a) of this title that the Secretary determines were not expended by the State in accordance with the agreements required to be made by the State as a condition of the receipt of payments under such section.

#### (2) Offset of amounts

If a State fails to make a repayment required in paragraph (1), the Secretary may offset the amount of the repayment against any amount due to be paid to the State under section 300d–11(a) of this title.

#### (b) Opportunity for hearing

Before requiring repayment of payments under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall provide to the State an opportunity for a hearing.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XII, §1219, as added Pub. L. 101–590, §3, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2925.)
§ 51.20 General. ( a ) An application for a passport, a replacement passport, or other passport related service must be completed using the forms the Department prescribes.
( b ) The passport applicant must truthfully answer all questions and must state every material matter of fact pertaining to his or her eligibility for a passport. All information and evidence submitted in connection with an application is considered part of the application. A person providing false information as part of a passport application, whether contemporaneously with the form or at any other time, is subject to prosecution under applicable Federal criminal statutes.
[72 FR 64931, Nov. 19, 2007, as amended at 80 FR 72592, Nov. 20, 2015]