alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4425 

To suspend temporarily the duty on black 661 inkjet printing ink. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on black 661 inkjet printing 

ink. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLACK 661 INKJET PRINTING INK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.39 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Black 661 inkjet printing ink) is amended by— 

7 (1) striking ‘‘0.3%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

8 (2) striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4425 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### (A) Richard Young et al., Respondents, v. Louis H. Figman, Appellant. (B) Dorothea J. Palmer, Formerly Known as Dorothea J. Ward, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Sophia L. Ward, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Respondent.

[In each action] On call of the calendar, there being no appearance by appellant [s] and no record having been filed, respondent’s oral motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, without costs; appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Moses, Appellant.

Moses, Appellant. — Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 23, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No issues were presented with respect to the facts. The instructions to the jury on the question of identification were prejudicial to defendant (see *People v Bell,*38 NY2d 116). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2502

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphonic acid (2-chloroethyl) 

(Ethephon). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphonic acid (2-

chloroethyl) (Ethephon).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHONIC ACID (2-CHLOROETHYL) 

4 (ETHEPHON). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.08.12 Phosphonic acid (2-

chloroethyl) (Ethephon) 

(CAS No. 16672–87–0) 

(provided in subheading 

2931.00.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2502 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 211.1 General purpose and scope; legislation. ( a ) *Legislation.* The Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954, as amended (Pub. L. 480), was further revised by the Agricultural Development and Trade Act of 1990, Public Law 101-624, 104 Stat. 3632-65 (1990). The legislation implemented by the regulation in this part (as of the date of issuance of this part) includes sections of Public Law 480, as follows: Sections 1, 2, 3, 201, 202, 203, 207, 401, 402, 403, 404, 406, 407, 408, 409, 413 and 414. Pursuant to title II of Public Law 480, A.I.D. may transfer agricultural commodities to address famine or other urgent or extraordinary relief requirements; combat malnutrition, especially in children and mothers; carry out activities that attempt to alleviate the causes of hunger, mortality and morbidity; promote economic and community development; promote sound environmental practices; and carry out feeding programs. Agricultural commodities may be provided to meet emergency food needs through foreign governments and private or public organizations, including intergovernmental organizations. Section 202(a) of Public Law 480 authorizes A.I.D., notwithstanding any other provision of law, to provide agricultural commodities for emergency food needs in such manner and on such terms and conditions as A.I.D. determines appropriate to respond to the emergency. Agricultural commodities also may be provided for non-emergency assistance through private voluntary organizations or cooperatives which are, to the extent practicable, registered with A.I.D., and through intergovernmental organizations.
( b ) *Terms and conditions.* This part 211, also known as A.I.D. Regulation 11, provides the standard terms and conditions applicable to title II programs, except those conducted by agencies of the United Nations and the World Food Program. The Operational Plan submitted by a cooperating sponsor may propose, and justify, the waiver of any section of this Regulation that is not required by statute. If A.I.D. approves a waiver, the specific section or subsection waived will be identified in the Transfer Authorization signed by the cooperating sponsor and A.I.D. or in an attachment, prepared by A.I.D., that is appended to the Operational Plan.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. (SBN: #099874) 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. (SBN: # 122676) 

STUBBS & LEONE 

A Professional Corporation 

2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 900 

Walnut Creek, California 94596 

Telephone: (925) 974-8600 

Facsimile: (925) 974-8601 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 

PAUL L. REIN, ESQ. (SBN: # 43053) 

JULIA OSTIL, ESQ. (SBN # 215202) 

CELIA McGUINNESS (SBN # 159420) 

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 

200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 832-5001 

Facsimile: (510) 832-4787 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JANICE PAYNE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANICE PAYNE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLLEGE 

DISTRICT; DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C08-03133 RS 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

 

The parties to the above captioned litigation hereby stipulate by and through their 

undersigned counsel of record to the following: 

\\\ 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT C-08-03113 RS 

CONFERENCE 

1 

Case 3:08-cv-03133-RS Document 50 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 2
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference in this matter is scheduled for 

July 1, 2010. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to participate in a Settlement 

Conference on August 5, 2010 before Magistrate Judge James Larson; 

WHEREAS, the parties hereby request that the Court continue the July 1, 2010 

Case Management Conference to September 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 30, 2010 STUBBS & LEONE

_____/S/______________________________ 

 CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 

Dated: June 30, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

 ______/S/___________________________ 

 CELIA McGUINESS, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff JANICE PAYNE 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties it is hereby ordered that the Case 

Management Conference in this matter be continued to __________________. 

 IT IS SO ORDRED: 

Dated: July____, 2010 __________________________________ 

 RICHARD SEEBORG DISTRICT JUDGE 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT C-08-03113 RS 

CONFERENCE 

2 

Case 3:08-cv-03133-RS Document 50 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 2
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH,

Plaintiff,

    v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants._______________________________                                

)))))))))) 

No. C 08-3729 MMC (PR)  

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’SDEPOSITION AND EXTENDDEADLINE FOR FILINGDISPOSITIVE MOTION

(Docket No. 46)

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff’s deposition is

hereby GRANTED.  Additionally, an extension of time is hereby GRANTED to defendants

to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. 

Defendants shall file their motion within sixty days of the date this order is filed. 

Within thirty days of the date such motion is filed, plaintiff shall file with the Court and

serve on defendants’ counsel opposition thereto.  Defendants shall file a reply to plaintiff’s

opposition within fifteen days of the date such opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket No. 46.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 4, 2010

_____________________________MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03729-MMC   Document 48   Filed 08/04/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T04:01:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Case 3:08-cv-03757-JL Document 38 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-03757-JL Document37 Filed05/19/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03757-JL Document 38 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-03757-JL Document37 Filed05/19/10 Page2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03757-JL Document 38 Filed 05/28/10 Page 3 of 3 Case3:08-cv-03757-JL Document37 Filed05/19/10 Page3 of 3
#### § 1429.6 Oral argument.

The Board or the General Counsel, in their discretion, may request or permit oral argument in any matter arising under this subchapter under such circumstances and conditions as they deem appropriate.
Aviston Harris of Avee Tech Solutions,LLC

909 Deddingfield dr

Knightdale, NC 27545

I am petitioning for exemption for the following CFR’s .

Part 21 Airworthiness Certification 21, Subpart H 

Part 91 General Operating and Flight Rules: 91.417 , 91.409, 91.407, 91.405, 91.151, 91.121, 91.119, 

91.109, 91.105, 91.103(b)(2)

An exemption till allow Aviston Harris at Avee Tech Solutions, LLC. To operate the DJI Phantom 3 quad 

copter unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial videography and cinematography to 

I will abide by the rules of safety to operate my DJI Phantom 3 in safe environments that are firmly 

controlled, away from power lines, airports, raised or elevated lights and active populated areas. To 

safely operate my DJI Phantom 3 I will conduct extensive preflight inspections of each component. 

During flight I will adhere to safety flight protocol. The DJI Phantom 3 is restricted from attempting to fly 

in any no fly zones due to a safety feature written in the software that maps no fly zone areas. This 

feature will forbid the aircraft from entering the area. This feature will forbid the aircraft from entering 

the area. Also, I have researched and located all no fly zones in my area of use to make sure that I am 

not in the path. I will keep my DJI Phantom 3 at below 400 feet of maximum altitude when in flight 

while maintaining full visibility at all times. 

I will include all documentation that is included with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS that covers features, 

operations and safety. 

The UAS or DJI Phantom 3, is comprised of a unmanned aircraft and a transportable ground station. The 

DJI Phantom is a quad copter with a max weight of 3 pounds. Its equipped with 4 rotors that are battery 

powered. There’s a built in camera on the UAS that I will use in the state of North Carolina record real 

estate listing videos and pictures. 

Since the size, weight, speed and limited operating area the aircraft utilizes limits this aircraft I would 

like to become exempt from the following below. I will mark the aircraft with identifiable lettering so 

that anyon assisting me will be able to spot the aircraft also there are distinctive LED lights that 

illuminate. The aircraft does not have a cockpit, or pilot station to mark certain words or phrases. I 

would request exemption for maintenance inspections for aircraft with airworthiness certificates. I will 
peform preflight checks on my UAS before each flight that’s outlined in the operating documents. Since 

the UAS does not carry any passenger or pilot. A pilots license is not necessary , a license will not ensure 

remote control piloting skills. The risks of a UAS is a very low risk compared to that of a commercial 

aircraft with passengers and pilots. I have completed hours of training by flying numerous practice 

flights in remote areas as a hobbyist in several different weather conditions and environments, also 

using my flight simulator that is designed for the aircraft.
# Uradni list L 16I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 016I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 6218. januar 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 016I

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 6218. januar 2019

---

| Vsebina | | Popravki | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2019/73 z dne 17. januarja 2019 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz električnih koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ( UL L 16, 18.1.2019 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Popravki

Stran

*

Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2019/73 z dne 17. januarja 2019 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz električnih koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ( UL L 16, 18.1.2019 )

( UL L 16, 18.1.2019 )

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

Popravki

| 18.1.2019 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | LI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2019

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

LI 16/1

---

Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2019/73 z dne 17. januarja 2019 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz električnih koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije L 16 z dne 18. januarja 2019
  )

Stran 135, člen 4:

pred besedilom:

„Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.“

se doda:

„Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Vision Twenty-One, Inc. and Subsidiaries
for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,383,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,364,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,941,043
<INVENTORY>                                  4,649,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,864,897
<PP&E>                                      27,820,278
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,054,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             182,975,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,861,776
<BONDS>                                     77,226,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,431
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,550,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               182,975,796
<SALES>                                     19,154,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,225,672
<CGS>                                       18,257,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,154,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,729,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,886,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,886,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,611,614
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,274,044
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:2005-NM-087-AD.  Correction Grid.
#### § 225.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 225.101(i) or exempted under § 225.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
#### §§ 225.105-225.106 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                            372,479
<SECURITIES>                                    3,557,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,120,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                      138,869
<INVENTORY>                                     1,059,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,144,178
<PP&E>                                            779,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                    167,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  7,806,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,318,969
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            3,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,463,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    7,806,486
<SALES>                                         5,921,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,921,831
<CGS>                                           3,716,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,716,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  158,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 46,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   498,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                      149,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               348,716
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      348,716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
### §2361. Contract to purchase by priority purchaser

The Commission may, in the sale of any single-family or duplex house to a priority purchaser, enter into a contract to purchase which provides that the purchaser shall conclude his purchase within not more than three years after the date the contract is entered into. Such contracts to purchase shall provide for such periodic payments, including payments on account of principal, interest, or tax equivalents, as the Commission shall prescribe.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 6, §61, 69 Stat. 478.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
#### § 33.1 Purpose.

These rules clarify procedures for the administration of Section 7 of the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967. Section 7 of the Act establishes a Fishermen's Guaranty Fund to reimburse owners and charterers of United States commercial fishing vessels for certain losses and costs caused by the seizure and detention of their vessels by foreign countries under certain claims to jurisdiction not recognized by the United States.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREA GORDON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE BAY AREA AIR QUALITYMANAGEMENT DISTRICT,

Defendants.

)))))))))))

No. C08-3630 BZ

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Having received the parties stipulation and proposed

order to modify the pretrial scheduling order and trial, IT IS

ORDERED THAT:

1.  Initial submission of pretrial briefing, exhibits,

and related material: April 1, 2010

2.  Pretrial conference: April 22, 2010, 4:00 p.m.

3.  Trial Date: May 10, 2010 

4.  The trial date scheduled for MARCH 15, 2010 and the

pretrial conference scheduled for MARCH 2, 2010 are VACATED.

5.  There shall be no further continuances.

 Dated:  February 9, 2010

   Bernard Zimmerman 

  United States Magistrate JudgeG:\BZALL\-BZCASES\GORDON\SCHED ORD.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-03630-BZ   Document 59   Filed 02/09/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-10T18:57:38-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO