alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§4431 to 4436. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–288, title VII, §703, formerly title VI, §603, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 164; renumbered title VII, §703, Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(1), (2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3100

Section 4431, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §221, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to predisaster assistance.

Section 4432, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §222, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to emergency communications.

Section 4433, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §223, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to emergency transportation.

Section 4434, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §224, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to removal of debris.

Section 4435, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §225, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to fire suppression.

Section 4436, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §226, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1751, related to temporary housing assistance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1974, see section 605 of Pub. L. 93–288, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 5121 of this title.
### §3332. Cooperation between Federal agencies

In order to insure that all Federal programs related to areawide development are carried out in a coordinated manner—

(1) the Secretary is authorized to call upon other Federal agencies to supply such statistical data, program reports, and other materials as he deems necessary to discharge his responsibilities for areawide development, and to assist the President in coordinating the areawide development efforts of all Federal agencies; and

(2) all Federal agencies which are engaged in administering programs related to areawide development, or which otherwise perform functions relating thereto, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, consult with and seek advice from all other significantly affected Federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure fully coordinated programs.

(Pub. L. 89–754, title II, §202, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1261; Pub. L. 90–448, title VI, §602(c), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 532.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–448 substituted "areawide" for "metropolitan" wherever appearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

#### § 40.31 General. [Reserved]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Alejandro GARDUNO-GONZALEZ, Appellant.

No. 06-2540.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 2007.

Filed: May 29, 2007.

John James Ware, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

*415Catarina M. Ditraglia, Federal Public Defender’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Alejandro Garduno-Gonzalez, Jennings, MO, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Alejandro Garduno-Gonzalez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Having calculated a Guidelines imprisonment range of 46-57 months, the district court1 sentenced him to 46 months. He appeals, contending his sentence is unreasonable. We disagree. *See United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 261-62, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (appellate court reviews sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in light of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors); *United States v. Mathis,*451 F.3d 939, 941 (8th Cir.2006) (reasonableness review is akin to abuse-of-discretion review).

The record does not support Garduno-Gonzalez’s argument that the district court either misapprehended the advisory nature of the Guidelines or applied an excessively stringent standard to his request for a non-Guidelines sentence. At sentencing, the court properly considered the applicable Guidelines range, the nature of the offense, the defendant’s history and his proffered reasons for returning to the United States, as well as sentencing objectives, and determined that a sentence within the Guidelines range was reasonable under the circumstances. *See United States v. Hawk Wing,*433 F.3d 622, 631 (8th Cir.2006) (sentencing involves three-step process of calculating Guidelines range, determining if Guidelines departure is warranted, and considering § 3553(a) factors to decide whether to impose Guidelines sentence or non-Guidelines sentence). The Guidelines use of a prior felony conviction to increase both the offense level and the criminal history category was not impermissible double counting, *see United States v. Dyck,*334 F.3d 736, 740 (8th Cir.2003), and did not warrant special treatment in the court’s section 3553(a) analysis. We also reject Garduno-Gonza-lez’s sentence-disparity argument. *See United States v. Batchelder,*442 U.S. 114, 123-24, 99 S.Ct. 2198, 60 L.Ed.2d 755 (1979) (government is free to exercise nondiscriminatory prosecutorial discretion to select statute under which to charge defendant); *United States v. Sebastian,*436 F.3d 913, 916 (8th Cir.2006) (recognizing both Congress’s policymaking power and Attorney General’s prosecutorial discretion, and stating it is within province of “policymaking branches of government to determine that certain disparities are warranted, and thus need not be avoided”). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re: Robert Troy McClure

No. 06-13-00117-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 505.3 Procedures for requests. ( a ) The agency will consider all written requests received from an individual for records pertaining to herself/himself as a request made under the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a) whether or not the individual specifically cites the Privacy Act when making the request.
( b ) All requests under the Privacy Act should be directed to the FOIA/Privacy Act Office, Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, Suite 3349, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20237, which will coordinate the search of all systems of records specified in the request. Requests should state name, date of birth, and social security number.
( c ) Requests directed to any of the Agency's worldwide establishments which involve routine unclassified, administrative and personnel records available only at those establishments may be released to the individual by the establishment if it determines that such a release is authorized by the Privacy Act. All other requests shall be submitted by the establishment to the FOIA/Privacy Act Office, Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, Suite 3349, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20237, and the individual shall be so notified of this section in writing, when possible.
( d ) In those instances where an individual requests records pertaining to herself/himself, as well as records pertaining to another individual, group or some other category of the Agency's records, only that portion of the request which pertains to records concerning the individual will be treated as a Privacy Act request. The remaining portions of such a request will be processed as a Freedom of Information Act request and sent to the office noted in paragraph (b) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,451,754
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,110,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,098,325
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,962,084
<LOANS>                                         64,662,286
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,142,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,047,121
<DEPOSITS>                                      82,496,154
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,890,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                672,188
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,488,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  95,047,121
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,886,327
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  712,716
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    89,680
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,688,723
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,653,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,672,854
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,860,869
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      155,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    974,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,144,532
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,144,532
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       774,849
<EPS-BASIC>                                           2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,122,207
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,076,900
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,086,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      106,558
<RECOVERIES>                                         6,617
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,142,039
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,142,039
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0


</TABLE>
### §4571. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–616, title III, §301, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1849; Pub. L. 92–554, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1167; Pub. L. 93–282, title I, §105(a), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 127; Pub. L. 94–371, §3(a), July 26, 1976, 90 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 96–180, §7, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1303; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §962(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 592, which provided for a program of technical assistance to States, was redesignated section 520 of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 98–24, §2(b)(13), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 181, and is classified to section 290dd of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1****RedEnvelope, Inc.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Alison L. May, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.*/s/ Alison L. May*
#### § 312.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.
§ 213.19 Installment payments. ( a ) Whenever feasible, and except as otherwise provided by law, debts owed to the United States, together with interest, penalties and administrative costs, as required by § 213.11, will be collected in a single payment. However, where the CFO determines that a debtor is financially unable to pay the indebtedness in a single payment or that an alternative payment mechanism is in the best interest of the United States, the CFO may approve repayment of the debt in installments. The debtor has the burden of establishing that it is financially unable to pay the debt in a single payment or that an alternative payment mechanism is warranted. If the CFO agrees to accept payment by installments, the CFO may require a debtor to execute a written agreement which specifies all the terms of the repayment arrangement and which contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event of default. The size and frequency of installment payments will bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. The installment payments will be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the debt in not more than 3 years, unless the CFO determines that a longer period is required. Installment payments of less than $50 per month generally will not be accepted, but may be accepted where the debtor's financial or other circumstances justify.
( b ) If a debtor owes more than one debt and designates how a voluntary installment payment is to be applied among the debts, that designation will be approved if the CFO determines that the designation is in the best interest of the United States. If the debtor does not designate how the payment is to be applied, the CFO will apply the payment to the various debts in accordance with the best interest of the United States, paying special attention to applicable statutes of limitations.
[67 FR 47258, July 18, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 31143, June 11, 2021]
#### Margaret A. Young and Another, Respondents, v. Seneca Fire Insurance Company of Buffalo, N. Y., Appellant.

Final and interlocutory judgments reversed, without costs. All concur.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
          TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007,
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 17, 2007

                                                /s/ R. Greg Smith
                                                -----------------
                                                R. Greg Smith
                                                Chief Financial Officer
AMY KLOBUCHAR 

MINNESOTA 

MENT OF 

jRWlOh 

OPERATIONS 

COMMITTEES: • "' ' \ ''•^'^DT^~'^\' \ 

^^''"^j^s^s^'"^' Bnited States Senate ""^•^'^^"^'^ 

COMMERCE, SCIENCE. WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

AND TRANSPORTATION 

JOirn ECONOMIC COMMITTEE b i C A ii ^ 3 i 

JUDICIARY 

August 4,2011 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: St Ctoud Airport Grant Application - CFDA #20.930 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I am writing to urge your strong consideration of the proposal being submitted by the St. Cloud 

Airport for the Small Community Air Service Development Program grant in die amount of $750,000. 

The grant would be used to enhance air service in the St Cloud area. 

St Cloud Aiiport would use the Small Community Air Service Development Program to 

rehabilitate the air service in the St. Cloud area. In 2009, regularly scheduled air service in St Cloud was 

discontinued at great disadvantage to area businesses. The grant will provide the St. Cloud Aiiport with 

the funds necessary to reinstate dir^t air transportation services to the residents of the St Cloud area. The 

Small Community Air Service Development Program grant would help offset startup costs, pay for 

marketing efforts, and cover any costs incurred by carriers to rejuvenate the St Cloud area air service. In 

addition to these important enhancements, this project will ensure that the St Cloud Airport is able to 

provide direct, affordable air transit options for the communities they serve. 

As a member of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, I understand that a 

strong transportation infrastructure is invaluable to the economic growth of a region, this proposal would 

ensure that transportation available to the residents of the St. Cloud area would be of the high^ level and 

would improve the economic development of the area. Ultimately, this proposal would help improve the 

quality of life for citizens through the creation of a stronger transportation infrastructure. 

For the reasons above, I encourage your strong consideration of this proposal. If you have any 

questions or need additional information, please contact Gia Vitali in my Minnesota office at (612) 727-

5220 or by email at gia_vitali@klobuchar.senate.gov. 

Sincerely, ]C\dUL^ 

Am:^^lobucn| 

Unitedatbtes Senator
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DASSAULT SYSTÈMES SOLIDWORKS

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-04397 WHA

ORDER REGARDING TRIAL

AND PROPOSED CONSENT

JUDGMENT

The undersigned has received the filings from the parties, submitted at 12:25 a.m. this

morning, and reviewed them a few minutes ago. The parties are entitled to settle this case. They

are not entitled, however, to a judicial ruling as set forth in paragraph two of the proposed consent

judgment. The trial will commence as scheduled at 7:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-04397-WHA Document 246 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 51.27 Incompetents.

A legal guardian or other person with the legal capacity to act on behalf of a person declared incompetent may execute a passport application on the incompetent person's behalf.
### §3153. Prohibition on use of funds for attorney's and consultant's fees

Assistance made available under this subchapter shall not be used directly or indirectly for an attorney's or consultant's fee incurred in connection with obtaining grants and contracts under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title II, §213, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3607.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3153, Pub. L. 89–136, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 93–423, §5(d), Sept. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1160; amended Pub. L. 94–487, title I, §112, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2334; Pub. L. 96–506, §1(6), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 97–35, title XVIII, §1821(a)(5), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 766, authorized appropriations for supplemental and basic grants and loans, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
data for the three month period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. Dollar amounts in thousands,
except earnings per share.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                        84
<INVENTORY>                                        716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,864
<PP&E>                                           8,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,708
<SALES>                                          3,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,171
<CGS>                                            1,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (70)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 14th day of August 2003.



                                                  /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer