alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Napolitano, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 13, 1976, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of bribe receiving in the second degree and sale of a fraudulent license and sentencing him to two concurrent indeterminate four-year terms of imprisonment and 30 days imprisonment on said respective charges, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence on each bribe receiving count to six months to run concurrently with the 30-day sentence imposed on' the conviction of sale of a false or fraudulent license and except as thus modified, affirmed. On February 20, 1976, at approximately 6:30 p.m., defendant was arrested outside his home pursuant to a warrant of arrest and was advised of his constitutional rights. Later that evening, at the office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor, defendant was told that he had already been indicted for bribe receiving. He was shown a copy of the indictment. He was also confronted by the undercover agent from whom he had allegedly accepted the bribe. He was again informed of his rights and was subsequently questioned both by an Assistant District Attorney and the Special Prosecutor. During the course of this questioning defendant made certain admissions which were received in evidence against him at trial. It was not until an hour and one-half after his arrival at the Special Prosecutor’s office that defendant made a telephone call to arrange for an attorney. After a *Huntley*hearing the trial court found that defendant had been properly advised of his rights, that he was not coerced during the questioning by any of the representatives of the prosecutor, and that his co-operation was voluntary and willing. The trial court held that there was no absolute proscription against postindictment custodial interrogation in the absence of counsel where counsel had not yet entered the case. We do not believe this to be the present posture of the law. (See *People v Cole,*41 NY2d 944; *People v Di Biasi,*7 NY2d 544; cf. *People v Hobson,*39 NY2d 479; *People v Meyer,*11 NY2d 162.) In the circumstances presented, if the Special Prosecutor wished to speak to defendant about his co-operation, we believe he should have been prepared to forego the use of any statements made by defendant in the course of such a discussion. However, because of the overwhelming weight of the People’s evidence, we conclude that the *956admission of defendant’s statements was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *(People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230.) Except for the excessiveness of the sentence to the extent indicated we find no merit to the other points raised by appellant. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.; Lynch, J., concurs in the result only.
§ 34.5 Other procedures or actions. ( a ) Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to require STATE to duplicate administrative proceedings required by contract or other laws or regulations.
( b ) Nothing in this regulation is intended to preclude utilization of informal administrative actions or remedies which may be available.
( c ) Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to deter STATE from demanding the return of specific property or from demanding the return of the property or the payment of its value.
( d ) The failure of STATE to comply with any provision in this regulation shall not serve as defense to the debt.
#### § 213.28 Execution of releases.

Upon receipt of full payment of a claim or the amount compromised, USAID will prepare and execute a release on behalf of the United States. In the event a mutual release is not executed when a debt is compromised, unless prohibited by law, the debtor is still deemed to have waived any and all claims and causes of action against USAID and its officials related to the transaction giving rise to the compromised debt.
Third District.

#### Ralph Bradford, by Claude Bradford, appellee, v. J. G. Fisher, appellant.

Action for personal injuries received by plaintiff when run over by an automobile driven by defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. Augustus A. Partlow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1921.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 10, 1922.

Jinkins & Jinkins, for appellant; Ralph M. Jinkins, of counsel. David Allison and Graham & Dysert, for appellee; Thomas A. Graham, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4357 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4357

        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Nitroanthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Nitroanthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-NITROANTHRAQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.41.01        1-Nitro-9,10-       Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          anthracenedione                                                   12/31/2016
                          (CAS No. 82-34-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2914.70.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §283f. Requirements regarding surveys of sexual behavior

With respect to any survey of human sexual behavior proposed to be conducted or supported through the National Institutes of Health, the survey may not be carried out unless—

(1) the proposal has undergone review in accordance with any applicable requirements of sections 289 and 289a of this title; and

(2) the Secretary, in accordance with section 289a–1 of this title, makes a determination that the information expected to be obtained through the survey will assist—

(A) in reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, the incidence of infection with the human immunodeficiency virus, or the incidence of any other infectious disease; or

(B) in improving reproductive health or other conditions of health.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §404D, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title II, §207, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 148.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Prohibition Against SHARP Adult Sex Survey and American Teenage Sex Survey

Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2015, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 217, provided that: "The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not during fiscal year 1993 or any subsequent fiscal year conduct or support the SHARP survey of adult sexual behavior or the American Teenage Study of adolescent sexual behavior. This section becomes effective on the date of the enactment of this Act [June 10, 1993]."
#### § 303.15 Preservation of records.

The Peace Corps will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration. The Peace Corps will not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.

[89 FR 25527, Apr. 11, 2024]
#### § 171.17 Preservation of records.

The Department must preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code and applicable records disposition schedules, including the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration. The Department must not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
### §401a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 836, title I, §116, 70 Stat. 833; Sept. 13, 1966, Pub. L. 86–778, title VII, §704, 74 Stat. 994; July 30, 1965, Pub. L. 89–97, title I, §109(b), 79 Stat. 340, which established an initial Advisory Council on Social Security Financing to review the status of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund in relation to long term commitments to old-age, survivors, and disability insurance programs, appointed personnel and provided for their compensation, required a report of the findings and recommendations of the Council to be submitted to the Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the abovementioned Trust Funds not later than Jan. 1, 1959, at which time the Council terminated, provided for subsequent Advisory Councils to be appointed in 1963, 1966, and every fifth year thereafter and to submit reports to Congress, and required additional information be included in these reports, was omitted in view of the termination of the initial Advisory Council on submission of their report not later than Jan. 1, 1959, the repeal of subsec. (e) by Pub. L. 89–97, title I, §109(b), July 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 340, which provided for the subsequent Advisory Councils, and the obsolescence of subsec. (f), which provided for additional information in reports to Congress, upon the repeal of subsec. (e).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                       304
<INVENTORY>                                      3,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,709
<PP&E>                                           1,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                     418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,051
<SALES>                                         19,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,802
<CGS>                                            9,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,283
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.58)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

#### § 41.23 Accredited officials in transit.

An accredited official of a foreign government intending to proceed in immediate and continuous transit through the United States on official business for that government is entitled to the benefits of INA 212(d)(8) if that government grants similar privileges to officials of the United States, and is classifiable C-3 under the provisions of INA 101(a)(15)(C). Members of the immediate family, attendants, servants, or personal employees of such an official receive the same classification as the principal alien.
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT Of ENVIRONMENTAl QUAliTY STEVEN A. THOMPSON BRAD HENRY 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Governor Executive Director

March 19, 2008 Lafarge Building Materials Attn: Ms. Pamela Bennett 2609 N. 14Sth East Avenue Tulsa, 

## OK 74116 Subject: Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver Lafarge Tulsa Cement Plant DearMs. Bennett: The Oklahoma Departinent ofEnvironmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART waiver request for the referenced.site on December 1,2006.
. Afterthe technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Tulsa Cement Plant. This.**waiv~r** is based on facility BART sources which are not expected to cause or contribute to visibility impacts at Class I areas based on submittedmoQeling. While ODEQ has approved the waiver, the waiver is**~ubject** to EPA and public comment during the Regional Haze.State Implementation Program (SIP).approvalprocess. Thank**YQ~ _f?r~ol!!** **2~~~eration** in this matter. Ifwe may be offurther service, please r contact-Phl!JlP_!lt::I<!er**(~OS)** 702-4100.
.

# ~Y'

# DaWSO~fEngineer AIR QUALITY DIVISION

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73101-1677 printed on recycled paper with soyink \)
### §285e–9. Alzheimer's disease registry

#### (a) In general

The Director of the Institute may make a grant to develop a registry for the collection of epidemiological data about Alzheimer's disease and its incidence in the United States, to train personnel in the collection of such data, and for other matters respecting such disease.

#### (b) Qualifications

To qualify for a grant under subsection (a) an applicant shall—

(1) be an accredited school of medicine or public health which has expertise in the collection of epidemiological data about individuals with Alzheimer's disease and in the development of disease registries, and

(2) have access to a large patient population, including a patient population representative of diverse ethnic backgrounds.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §445G, formerly Pub. L. 99–158, §12, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 885; renumbered §445G of act July 1, 1944, and amended Pub. L. 103–43, title VIII, §801, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 285e–2 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–43.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–43, §801(b)(1), reenacted section catchline without change.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–43, §801(b)(1), substituted in heading "In general" for "Grant authority" and in text substituted "Director of the Institute" for "Director of the National Institute on Aging".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–43, §801(b)(2), struck out subsec. (c) which authorized appropriations of $2,500,000 for grants to remain available until expended or through fiscal year 1989, whichever occurred first.
### §300x–61. Solicitation of views of certain entities

In carrying out this part, the Secretary, as appropriate, shall solicit the views of the States and other appropriate entities.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIX, §1951, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title II, §203(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 408.)
#### § 18.9 Contents of complaint.

A complaint shall plainly and concisely describe the allegations which constitute the basis for the proceeding. A complaint shall be deemed sufficient if it fairly informs the respondent of the charges against him/her so that the respondent is able to prepare a defense. Written notification shall be given of the place and of the time within which the respondent shall file his/her answer, which time shall not be less than 15 days from the date of service of the complaint. Notice shall be given that a decision by default may be rendered against the respondent in the event he/she fails to file an answer.
#### §§ 1510.141-1510.148 [Reserved]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2461 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain Kashmir (cashmere) 

hair. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. SIMMONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

Kashmir (cashmere) hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN KASHMIR (CASHMERE) HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.51.15 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain fine animal hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2461 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §§4241 to 4244. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068

Section 4241, Pub. L. 90–577, title VI, §601, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1106, related to Congressional review of grant-in-aid programs. See section 6507 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

Section 4242, Pub. L. 90–577, title VI, §602, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1107, related to studies by the Comptroller General of Federal grant-in-aid programs and reports to Congress. See section 6508(a) of Title 31.

Section 4243, Pub. L. 90–577, title VI, §603, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1107, related to studies by the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations and a report of its findings to Congress. See section 6508(b) of Title 31.

Section 4244, Pub. L. 90–577, title VI, §604, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1107, provided for preservation of House and Senate committee jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Mooney Aerospace
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gretchen L. Jahn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:  August 21, 2006              By: /s/ Gretchen L. Jahn
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gretchen L. Jahn
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
### §3537. Separability

Notwithstanding any other evidence of the intent of Congress, it is hereby declared to be the intent of Congress that if any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any persons or circumstances, shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder of this chapter or its application to other persons and circumstances, but shall be confined in its operation to the provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to the persons and circumstances, directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.

(Pub. L. 89–174, §10, Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 89–174, Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 667, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3531 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 624f of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 1, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,954
<PP&E>                                       1,062,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,320,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,729
<BONDS>                                        340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           409
<OTHER-SE>                                     496,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,320,469
<SALES>                                        323,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,397
<CGS>                                          166,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,659
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,659
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>