alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, John C. Pound, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 of RedEnvelope,Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:November 14, 2007        *By:*  */s/*JOHN C. POUND    *John C. Pound*    *Executive Chairman & PrincipalExecutive Officer*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Julian C. La Vin, Relator, v. Herbert S. Sisson, Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, Respondent.

Writ sustained, without costs, and the determination of the State Commissioner of Excise modified so as to require the computation of the tax upon the gross sales on the basis of the exemption of ten and fifteen times, as the case requires, of the amount of $1,100, being the tax paid upon the certificate in question. We think that the scheme of the statute † is to tax the gross sales of liquor under the certificate for its duration; that while the authority granted to the State Commissioner of Excise to prescribe the periods of the returns and to assess the tax based upon the returns may result in the computation of a tax which would differ from a tax on the gross sales during the life of the certificate, yet the primary purpose of this authority is administrative and is not given for the purpose of changing the basis of the tax prescribed in the statute. In this ease the requirement of the quarterly returns and the computation of the tax based upon them and upon “ such other information as he may acquire,” does not of necessity require a departure from the general plan of the statute that the tax bill shall be imposed upon the gross sales during the life of the certificate. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur; Putnam, J., not voting.

†

 See Liquor Tax Law, § 9a, added by Laws of 1917, chap. 623, as amd. by Laws of 1918, chap. 473.— [Rep.
### §300s–4. Reporting and audit requirements for recipients

#### (a) Filing of financial statement with appropriate State Agency; form and contents

In the case of any facility for which an allotment payment, grant, loan, or loan guarantee has been made under this subchapter, the applicant for such payment, grant, loan, or loan guarantee (or, if appropriate, such other person as the Secretary may prescribe) shall file at least annually with the State Agency for the State in which the facility is located a statement which shall be in such form, and contain such information, as the Secretary may require to accurately show—

(1) the financial operations of the facility, and

(2) the costs of the facility of providing health services in the facility and the charges made by the facility for providing such services,

during the period with respect to which the statement is filed.

#### (b) Maintenance of records; access to books, etc., for audit and examination

(1) Each entity receiving Federal assistance under this subchapter shall keep such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by such entity of the proceeds of such assistance, the total cost of the project in connection with which such assistance is given or used, the amount of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(2) The Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of such entities which in the opinion of the Secretary or the Comptroller General may be related or pertinent to the assistance referred to in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Filing of financial statement with Secretary; form and contents

Each such entity shall file at least annually with the Secretary a statement which shall be in such form, and contain such information, as the Secretary may require to accurately show—

(1) the financial operations of the facility constructed or modernized with such assistance, and

(2) the costs to such facility of providing health services in such facility, and the charges made for such services, during the period with respect to which the statement is filed.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVI, §1625, formerly §1634, as added Pub. L. 93–641, §4, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2273; renumbered §1625, Pub. L. 96–79, title II, §202(b), Oct. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 632.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1625 of act July 1, 1944, was renumbered section 1610 by Pub. L. 96–79, title II, §203(b), Oct. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 635, and is classified to section 300r of this title.
### §5132. Disaster warnings

#### (a) Readiness of Federal agencies to issue warnings to State and local officials

The President shall insure that all appropriate Federal agencies are prepared to issue warnings of disasters to State and local officials.

#### (b) Technical assistance to State and local governments for effective warnings

The President shall direct appropriate Federal agencies to provide technical assistance to State and local governments to insure that timely and effective disaster warning is provided.

#### (c) Warnings to governmental authorities and public endangered by disaster

The President is authorized to utilize or to make available to Federal, State, and local agencies the facilities of the civil defense communications system established and maintained pursuant to section 5196(c) of this title or any other Federal communications system for the purpose of providing warning to governmental authorities and the civilian population in areas endangered by disasters.

#### (d) Agreements with commercial communications systems for use of facilities

The President is authorized to enter into agreements with the officers or agents of any private or commercial communications systems who volunteer the use of their systems on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis for the purpose of providing warning to governmental authorities and the civilian population endangered by disasters.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title II, §202, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 145; Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3412(b)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3111.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "section 5196(c) of this title" for "section 2281(c) of title 50, Appendix,".
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2589 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2589

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain filament yarns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain filament yarns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FILAMENT YARNS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain filament yarns) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(the " Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 15, 2004             By:    /s/ Carmine N. Stella
                                                 ---------------------
                                          Name:  Carmine N. Stella
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(the " Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 15, 2004                 By:      /s/ Carol Russell
                                                       -----------------
                                                Name:  Carol Russell
                                                Title: Treasurer
#### Henry Pearce et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Pearce, Mayer & Greer, Respondents, v. Jefferson Villas, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. The plaintiff’s time to serve the amended complaint is extended for a period of 10 days from the date of entry of this order. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
June 21, 2010

UNITED STATES

D

I

STRICT COURT

NORTHERN

DIST

RI

CT

OF CALIFORNIA

IT

IS

SO

ORDERED

Judge

Marilyn

H. Patel
#### In the Matter of Three Forty Madison Avenue Corporation, Appellant. Gristede Bros., Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote to reverse. The intended meaning of the *“*subject *”*clause in the stipulation of settlement relied on herein is ambiguous and should not be determined until evidence has been adduced at the trial or hearing concerning the real intention of the parties. In this respect the case differs from *Matter of Moore (Smith)*(194 Misc. 718) on which the learned Special Term relied; in that case the agreement was clear and unambiguous. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to petitioner-appellant and the proceeding remitted for a hearing.
#### Rhea Aronstein, Respondent, v. Herbert Taylor, Appellant.

Order reversed and motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
#### (A) Vincent Saccente & Sons, Inc., v. Metro Hoist & Body Company, Inc. (B) Joan P. Tomforde v. National Builders Hardware Association et al.

[In each action] Application denied, with $10 costs. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated December 27, 1960, is vacated. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48198-48199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19800]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7977]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Faking It: Manipulated Photography Before Photoshop''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Faking It: Manipulated Photography Before 
Photoshop,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
October 11, 2012, until on or about January 27, 2013, the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about February 17, 2013, 
until on or about May 5, 2013, the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Texas, 
from on or about June 2, 2013, until on or about August 25, 2013, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of

[[Page 48199]]

these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 6, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-19800 Filed 8-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


2005 National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program

    Notice is hereby given that Public Law 99-190, as amended, 
authorizing the National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program, has 
been funded for 2005 in the amount of $7,000,000.00. All requests for 
information and applications for grants should be received by 31 
December 2004 and addressed to: Frederick J. Lindstrom, Acting 
Secretary/NCACA Program Administrator, Commission of Fine Arts, 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20001-2728. Phone: 202-504-2200.
    Deadline for receipt of grant applications is March 1, 2005.
    This program provides grants for general operating support of 
organizations whose primary purpose is performing, exhibiting, and/or 
presenting the arts. To be eligible for a grant, organizations must be 
located in the District of Columbia, must be non-profit, non-academic 
institutions of demonstrated national repute, and must have annual 
incomes, exclusive of federal funds, in excess of one million dollars 
for each of the past three years. Organizations seeking grants must 
provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&S) Data Universal Numbering System 
(DUNS) number when applying.

Frederick J. Lindstrom,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-27524 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Felix Epstein, Deceased. Peter R. Epstein, Appellant; Sonia Mauthner, Respondent.

*453[715 NYS2d 904]

—In a proceeding for judicial settlement of an estate and an estate trust, the petitioner Peter R. Epstein appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated August 4, 1999, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment dismissing objections to his account as executor and trustee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent Sonia Mauthner had standing to object to the accountings filed by the petitioner, since she was a contingent remainderman with an interest subject to a condition precedent (see, *Benjamin v Morgan Guar. Trust Co.,*163 AD2d 135; *Matter of Morse, 177*Misc 2d 43; *see also, Matter of Webb,*194 App Div 915). Moreover, the determination as to whether a fiduciary’s conduct measures up to the appropriate standards of prudence, vigilance, and care is generally an issue to be determined by the trier of fact *(see, Matter of Donner,*82 NY2d 574; *Matter of Hubbell,*302 NY 246; *Matter of Janes,*223 AD2d 20; *Matter of Yarm,*119 AD2d 754).

In light of these findings, the petitioner’s remaining contentions need not be addressed. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
§ 504.10 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the testimony of BBG employees including, for example: ( 1 ) Limiting the areas of testimony;
( 2 ) Requiring the requester and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal;
( 3 ) Requiring that the transcript will be used or made available only in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The General Counsel may also require a copy of the transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
( b ) The BBG may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee shall not: ( 1 ) Disclose confidential or privileged information; or
( 2 ) For a current BBG employee, testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of the BBG unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
( d ) The scheduling of an employee's testimony, including the amount of time that the employee will be made available for testimony, will be subject to the BBG's approval.
#### Lekas & Drivas, Respondent, v. Albert Schwill & Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2576 

To extend the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYL PYRUVATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.48 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ethyl pyruvate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-217 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AUSTRALIA 

Signed at Canberra February 28, 2006 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
AUSTRALIA 

Scientific Cooperation 

Agreement signed at Canberra February 28, 2006; 

 Entered into force February 17, 2007. 

 With annexes.