alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.201 Failure of application to comply with INA. ( a ) *Refusal under INA 221(g).* The consular officer shall refuse an alien's visa application under INA 221(g)(2) as failing to comply with the provisions of INA or the implementing regulations if: ( 1 ) The applicant fails to furnish information as required by law or regulations;
( 2 ) The application contains a false or incorrect statement other than one which would constitute a ground of ineligibility under INA 212(a)(6)(C);
( 3 ) The application is not supported by the documents required by law or regulations;
( 4 ) The applicant refuses to be fingerprinted as required by regulations;
( 5 ) The necessary fee is not paid for the issuance of the visa or, in the case of an immigrant visa, for the application therefor;
( 6 ) In the case of an immigrant visa application, the alien fails to swear to, or affirm, the application before the consular officer; or
( 7 ) The application otherwise fails to meet specific requirements of law or regulations for reasons for which the alien is responsible.
( b ) *Reconsideration of refusals.* A refusal of a visa application under paragraph (a)(1) of this section does not bar reconsideration of the application upon compliance by the applicant with the requirements of INA and the implementing regulations or consideration of a subsequent application submitted by the same applicant.
[56 FR 30422, July 2, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 1835, Jan. 24, 1996. Redesignated at 61 FR 59184, Nov. 21, 1996]
### §2707. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–644, §15, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2329; Pub. L. 94–341, §3(d), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 807, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1975 through 1977, with possibility of extension for an additional fiscal year and carryover of unobligated funds.
### §3148. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–373, title II, §206(a), Oct. 27, 2004, 118 Stat. 1761

Section, Pub. L. 89–136, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3605, related to prevention of unfair competition.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

**E-filed 05/10/2010** 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

COMMITTEE FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS 

OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 08-4220 RS 

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER 

BRIEFING 

On May 7, 2010, the individual federal defendants filed a notice of interlocutory appeal as to 

the March 10, 2010 Order granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss the Second 

Amended Complaint. It appears that the federal defendants believe that their deadline to appeal 

was not affected by the pendency of their motion to reconsider, which was under submission. But 

see, Mitchell v. Maurer, 67 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1933). 

No later than May 17, 2010, the parties shall submit supplemental briefs setting forth their 

views as to the impact of the notice of appeal, if any, on this Court’s jurisdiction to decide the 

motion for reconsideration either as to the federal defendants, the county defendants, or both. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 05/10/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:08-cv-04220-RS Document 188 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 442 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 

Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner 

waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after 

written receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 

to require the Bureau of Land Management to provide 

a claimant of a small miner waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written receipt 

of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay 

the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 442 IH

1 SECTION 1. SMALL MINER WAIVERS TO CLAIM MAINTE2 NANCE FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10101(d)(3) of the Omni4 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

5 28f(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘for any reason, the 

6 claimant shall have a period of 60 days after receipt of 

7 written notification of the defect or defects by the Bureau 

8 of Land Management to:’’ and inserting ‘‘for any reason 

9 (including the failure to timely file a small miner’s mainte10 nance fee waiver application or an affidavit of annual labor 

11 associated with the application and required application 

12 fees), the claimant shall have a period of 60 days after 

13 receipt of written notification of the 1 or more defects pro14 vided by the Bureau of Land Management by registered 

15 mail to’’. 

16 (b) TRANSITION RULES.— 

17 (1) The claimholder of claims numbered 

18 AA023149, AA023163, AA047913, AA047914, 

19 AA047915, AA047916, AA047917, AA047918, and 

20 AA047919 (as of December 29, 2004) shall be con21 sidered— 

22 (A) to have received a first half final cer23 tificate for application AA072648 (associated 

24 with the claims) before September 30, 1994; 

25 and 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 442 IH

1 (B) to qualify for relief under section 

2 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili3 ation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) and 

4 have the opportunity to cure under that section 

5 for any prior period for which 1 or more defects 

6 existed or there was a failure to pay claim 

7 maintenance fees. 

8 (2) The claims numbered AAFF057833, 

9 AKFF057834, AKFF057840, AKFF084389, 

10 AKFF085204, AKFF096323, AKFF086324, 

11 AKFF086267, AKFF084387, and AKFF084388 

12 shall be— 

13 (A) considered to qualify for relief under 

14 section 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget 

15 Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

16 28f(d)(3)); and 

17 (B) given notice of defect and the oppor18 tunity to cure. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
#### § 234.16 Governing Law.

This Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-13-00930-CR OFFENSE: 22.04

Alice Annette Steele v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Dallas

f n -/5

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 194th Judicial District Court

DATE: 03/19/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-0845120-M

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Alice Annette Steele v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

APPELLAfl/r-^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: CTWv XI -^ 2~*l. y 'ZO/*'

JUDGE: y^c

CCA#: *m-ig

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
### §16925. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16925 was editorially reclassified as section 20927 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
=
h

Medicine Bo' 2 |

Rock R

a

| 1
| 4
ont

f

a
+44 |

CARBON

Cheyenne

| de | J
| a
oe ne [
R98W)_ | a _ 92 1 — 89)

| Wildlife Habitat Management Area
1 Chain Lakes

Red Rim-Daley
Jep Canyon
Pennock Mountain
Wick-Beumee

Laramie Plains Lakes

NO a F&F WOW ND

Laramie Peak

‘iggy Maia alas ee Bc ds CE A to ero bier te nS ee

es
8

Fish Habitat
Management Area

8 Upper Muddy Creek/Grizzly

| | Research Area
9 Stratton Sagebrush Steppe

| | Management Area
10 JO Ranch Site
11 High Savery Dam
12 Rawlins OHV Area
13 Shamrock Hills

hi 69)
7A 70 68) 67, 66, 65, 64 63 6g R61W_ 6

Q 10 20 40 60 80 100
Va
Oo 5 10 20 30 40 50
Miles

Map 2-13
Other Special Management Areas
Alternative 4
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4418 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic staple 

fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4418 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fibers 

(polyacrylonitrile staple), 

not carded, combed, or 

otherwise processed for 

spinning, the foregoing 

containing by weight 92 

percent or more of 

polyacrylonitrile, not more 

than 0.01 percent of zinc 

and 2 percent or more but 

not over 8 percent of 

water, with a decitex of 2.4 

to 3.7 (plus or minus 10 

percent), a fiber shrinkage 

of from 0 to 22 percent 

(plus or minus 10 percent), 

and a cut fiber length of 

89 to 140 mm, with a target length of 115 mm (provided for in subheading 

5503.30.00) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

NAFTALE GREEN,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (THE SALVATION ARMY),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 428 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Woodson Hobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pumatech, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 13, 2003



|/s/    WOODSON HOBBS                 
|-------------------------------------
|Woodson Hobbs                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer



|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Pumatech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Eugene M. Grant, Appellant, v. Edmund Lavoie et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages by reason of defendants’ alleged violation of the amended zoning ordinance of the Village of Mamaroneek, and to restrain them from erecting and building upon their land, and for other relief, plaintiff appeals: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 6, 1961, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (b) from the judgment of said court, entered November 14, 1961, on such order. Order and judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                  Certification of Principal Accounting Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Edward C. Gaiennie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Imperial Petroleum
Recovery Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

May 16, 2006


By: /s/ Edward C. Gaiennie
    ----------------------
    Edward C. Gaiennie
    Chief Financial Officer and Director
    (Principal Accounting Officer)

                                       23
### §3935. Financing the corporation

The corporation shall have the power to create and issue the number of shares stated in its articles of incorporation. Such shares may be divided into one or more classes, any or all of which classes may consist of shares with par value or shares without par value, with such designations, preferences, voting powers, and special or relative rights and such limitations, restrictions, or qualifications thereof as shall be stated in the articles of incorporation. The articles of incorporation may limit or deny the voting power of the shares of any class.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title IX, §905, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 548.)
### §3796ee–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ee–5 was editorially reclassified as section 10406 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §3788. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3788 was editorially reclassified as section 10226 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3788, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §810, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1204, contained in part provisions similar to subsec. (a) of section 10226 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, prior to repeal by section 609B(e) of Pub. L. 98–473.
### §3795. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3795 was editorially reclassified as section 10271 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3795, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §670, as added Pub. L. 91–644, title I, §12, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1889; amended Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 218, related to reports to Congress and President, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157. See section 10229 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4347 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2012 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 

West 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert 

Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 4347 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 709 West 

3 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States Court5 house’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States 

11 Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert L. Voelk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Voelk     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Voelk         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

1

----
#### § 312.105 Does this part apply to me?

(a) Portions of this part apply to you if you are either—

(1) A recipient of an assistance award from the Peace Corps; or

(2) A(n) Peace Corps awarding official. (See definitions of award and recipient in §§ 312.605 and 312.660, respectively.)

(b) The following table shows the subparts that apply to you:

| If you are . . . | see subparts . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A recipient who is not an individual | A, B and E. |
| (2) A recipient who is an individual | A, C and E. |
| (3) A(n) Peace Corps awarding official | A, D and E. |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2444 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2444

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayowet C4.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayowet C4.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAYOWET C4.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      1-Butanesulfonic    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Acid,                                                              31/2009
                         1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-
                          Nonafluoro-
                         Potassium Salt
                         (CAS #29420-49-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2904.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 50.11 Certificate of identity for travel to the United States to apply for admission. ( a ) A person applying abroad for a certificate of identity under section 360(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall complete the application form prescribed by the Department and submit evidence to support his claim to U.S. nationality.
( b ) When a diplomatic or consular officer denies an application for a certificate of identity under this section, the applicant may submit a written appeal to the Secretary through the U.S. embassy or consulate where the individual applied for the certificate of identity, stating the pertinent facts, the grounds upon which U.S. nationality is claimed, and his or her reasons for considering that the denial was not justified.
[31 FR 14521, Nov. 11, 1966, as amended at 83 FR 21874, May 11, 2018]