alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Casper De Jesus, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmelo Caraballo, Appellant.

Appeal by defendants (1) from judgments of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered October 21, 1958, convicting them, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree (1st, 2nd and 3d counts), grand larceny in the first degree (4th count), and assault in the second degree (5th count); and sentencing them to serve not less than 10 or more than 30 years on the first robbery count. No sentence was imposed on the remaining counts. Judgments reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. The findings of fact are affirmed. The only witness who testified to the actual commission of the crime was the complainant. Defendants and their witnesses testified that they had returned to the farm where they were employed at about 2:00 a.m. on July 5, 1958. The complainant testified that the defendants committed the *712robbery and assault upon him at about 3:15 a.m. in the City of Poughkeepsie. Police Officer Doerr then testified that, on a liné-up some hours after the crime was committed, the complainant had identified the defendants. Such hearsay proof by the police officer for the purpose of corroborating the complainant’s identification of the defendants, constitutes reversible error (Code Grim. Pro., § 393-b; *People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471; *People*v. *Infantino,*224 App. Div. 193, 197, 198; *People*v. *Siegel,*4 A D 2d 680; *People*v. *Oliver,*4 A D 2d 28; *People*v. *Sarra,*283 App. Div. 876). In a close case such as this, where prejudicial error is committed, reversal is required in the interests of justice even though no exception was taken by defendants’ counsel *(People*v. *Bradley,*8 A D 2d 982; *People*v. *Curatolo,*7 A D 2d 996; *People*v. *Savage,*5 A D 2d 846; *People*v. *Siegel,*supra;*People*v. *Taylor,*2 A D 2d 977; *People*v. *Mahoney,*280 App. Div. 816). We have reviewed the other questions urged by defendants, and we would affirm this conviction were it not for the prejudicial error committed in admitting the testimony of Officer Doerr as set forth above. Defendants also appeal from each intermediate order. No separate appeal-lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgments of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Brennan, JJ., concur; Christ, J., concurs in result.
§ 51.2 Passport issued to nationals only. ( a ) A passport may be issued only to a U.S. national.
( b ) Unless authorized by the Department, no person may bear more than one valid passport of the same type.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|May 9, 2007                                                      |  | 

---



QuickLinks
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2573 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cuprammonium rayon yarn. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cuprammonium rayon 

yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CUPRAMMONIUM RAYON YARN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Multifilament yarn of cuprammonium rayon (other 

than sewing thread), untwisted, not dyed or finished, 

not put up for retail sale 

(provided for in subheading 

5403.39.00).. ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2010 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2573 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §4102a. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, §100225(c), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 941

Section, Pub. L. 90–448, title XIII, §1361A, as added Pub. L. 108–264, title I, §102(a), June 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 714, created a pilot program for mitigation of severe repetitive loss properties by mitigating flood damage to such properties and losses to the National Flood Insurance Fund from such properties.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustin RAMIREZ-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40507

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 18, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*272PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Augustin Ramirez-Reyes (Ramirez) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
### §4370i. Regional liaisons for minority, tribal, and low-income communities

#### (a) In general

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the "Administrator") shall assign at least one employee in each regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency to serve as a liaison to minority, Tribal, and low-income communities in the relevant region.

#### (b) Public identification

The Administrator shall identify each regional liaison assigned under subsection (a) on the internet website of—

(1) the relevant regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency; and

(2) the Office of Environmental Justice of the Environmental Protection Agency.

(Pub. L. 115–270, title IV, §4305, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3883.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.
June 17
#### Raymond J. Maginn, Respondent, v. Albert Donovan, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with $10 motion costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 133.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 133.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) The performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) The performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) You believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the Department of State awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

OF ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                    
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  |                                                    
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Thomas W. Reddoch                              
|                      |  | Thomas W. Reddoch, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  |                                                    
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Sharon L. Draper                               
|                      |  | Sharon L. Draper, Chief Accounting Officer         



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificate is being furnished solely for
purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75899-75900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
January 21, 2005, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be 
covered include: (1) Approval of minutes (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-
committees (4) Old Business. (5) Non Attendance/Informational/action 
item (6) Discussion/approval of projects, (7) Matters before the group 
(8) hand outs (9) next agenda items and meeting date.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 21, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 12 
noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, 
located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo 
Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983-8503: e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6b4aeb3b4b286a0b5e8a0a3a2e8b3b5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9abb1acabad99bfaaf7bfbcbdf7acaa">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 75900]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Persons 
who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff by January 17, 2005. Public 
comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the 
meeting.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Blaine Baker,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 04-27744 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond Greenblatt, Respondent, v. Raymac Cabinet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and Filray Corp. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appellants appeal from award which assessed 50% liability against the employer and carrier, it being their contention the record fails to substantiate that claimant sustained a second accident on their premises on October 8, 1957. The claimant was president of both the appellant and respondent corporation employers and in complete charge of various businesses. 'The Raymac Cabinet Company was the manufacturer and the Filray Corporation the selling agency. On the record as developed before the board, it was justified in finding against both carriers. Through a series of errors on the part of appellant employer, reports were made that the accident occurred on October 8. Various doctors either through the claimant’s reports or otherwise testified that the accident or accidents involved happened on that date. Although letters were written by the appellant to disregard the earlier reports, it was not until a hearing held on December 5, 1958, subsequent to the medical testimony, that the claimant in his testimony attempted to clarify the situation. As a result of this testimony it seems reasonable to assume that the correct sequence of events was that the claimant was first injured on October 1 while moving some cabinets at the respondent Filray premises, as a result of which he developed severe pain in his back which necessitated his going home. Several days thereafter, to wit, October 8, while still confined to his bed, he received a call from the appellant Raymac Cabinet Company requesting that he come there to aid in straightening out some orders and samples. He went to the premises where he remained for two or three hours; that he was suffering pain when he arose from bed and that *565after being at the appellant premises for some time he developed further pain which necessitated his returning home to bed and thereafter the services of his attending physician. There was substantial evidence to sustain the board’s memorandum as to the October 1 accident. The testimony as to the accident on October 8 is very limited due primarily to the confusion as to the dates of the accidents but we are satisfied that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the board’s memorandum that he sustained his second injury to his back on October 8 while employed at the premises of appellant Raymae Cabinet Company. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with cost to the respondents against the appellants.
#### § 71.3 American claimants to foreign estates and inheritances.

Where treaty provisions, local laws, or established usage permit, a consular officer should protect the interests of American citizens claiming foreign estates and inheritances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          56,330
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,894,121
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      4,134,580
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (39,673)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,454,459
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,929,492
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,499,802
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            167,146
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,280,528
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           792
<OTHER-SE>                                     576,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,454,459
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                148,386
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              119,060
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   620
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               268,066
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              85,026
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,785
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          103,281
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (11,050)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 39,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,295
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      48,526
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,526
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.25
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,428
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,320
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,155
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      569
<RECOVERIES>                                        87
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,673
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         39,673


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Thomas Spielbauer, Esq.

SBN 78281

THE SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE

111 North Market Street, Suite 300

San Jose, CA 95113

MAIL: Post Office Box 698

Santa Clara, CA 95052

(408)451-8499

Fax: (610)423-1395

thomas@spielbauer.com

Attorneys for Ruthie Hillery, Defendant

and the Spielbauer Law Firm, Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSUMER SOLUTIONS REO, LLC,

a Delaware Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff. 

v.s.

RUTHIE B. HILLERY, an Individual;

THE SPIELBAUER LAW FIRM, an

Unknown Business Entity; and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. 08-CV-04357-EMC

NOTICE OF TENTATIVE

SETTLEMENT

RUTHIE HILLERY,

Counter-Claimant. 

v.s.

CONSUMER SOLUTIONS REO, LLC,

a Delaware Limited Liability Company,

SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES,

INC.; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., 

Counter-Claim Defendants. 

Case 3:08-cv-04357-EMC Document 130 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties to this action have reached

settlement of this matter in principle. The final settlement documents have yet to

be prepared and executed and loan modification documents likewise have yet to

be prepared. The parties anticipate that these documents can be prepared and

executed within four weeks. As a result, the parties request that any and all

hearings scheduled in this matter, and any and all due dates, be stayed to permit

the agreement in principle to become an executed and final settlement of this

matter.

Upon execution of the agreement, Consumer Solutions and Ruthie Hillery

will seek to dismiss their matters against each of the defendants and crossdefendants and counter-claim defendants with prejudice.

Dated: May 4, 2010

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

THE SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE

by: Thomas Spielbauer, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter & Cross

Claimant

-2-

Case 3:08-cv-04357-EMC Document 130 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2
### §3712e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3712e was editorially reclassified as section 10106 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 232.03 The Guarantee.

Subject to the terms and conditions set out in this part, the United States of America, acting through USAID, guarantees to Noteholders the Borrower's repayment of 100 percent of principal and interest due on Eligible Notes. Under this Guarantee, USAID agrees to pay to any Noteholder compensation in Dollars equal to such Noteholder's Loss of Investment under its Eligible Note; provided, however, that no such payment shall be made to any Noteholder for any such loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which such Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became such Noteholder. This Guarantee shall apply to each Eligible Note registered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent.
### §3797c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797c was editorially reclassified as section 10553 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
R. Helm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Biometrics, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Biometrics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: May 14, 2004

                                                  /s/ Ronald R. Helm
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Ronald R. Helm,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer