alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 224.24 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or, with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the ALJ may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the ALJ;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the ALJ;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; or
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the ALJ.
#### Thomas J. Brennan, as Fire Commissioner, etc., v. Howard Hampton.

Motion granted. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
### §3513b. Working capital fund; availability for common personnel support services

The Working Capital Fund of the Department of Health and Human Services shall on and after August 10, 1971, be available for expenses necessary for common personnel support services in the Washington area.

(Pub. L. 92–80, title II, Aug. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of title II of Pub. L. 92–80, popularly known as the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Appropriation Act, 1972.

Section was formerly classified to section 905a of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
data for the nine month period ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                       299
<INVENTORY>                                        791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,859
<PP&E>                                           4,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,578
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,184
<SALES>                                         18,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,880
<CGS>                                           12,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,393)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       2
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,391)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)


</TABLE>
#### § 231.16 Governing law.

This Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
#### Carlos Mario PASTOR ALVAREZ, Appellant v. John NASH, Warden, Ft. Dix, NJ.

No. 06-1402.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted For Possible Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 May 17, 2007.

Filed May 31, 2007.

Carlos Mario Pastor Alvarez, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.

BEFORE: BARRY, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In 1996 Carlos Mario Pastor-Alvarez was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of conspiracy with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. Three years later, after an unsuccessful direct appeal, Pastor-Alvarez filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 which the sentencing court denied. In 2003 he filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. It too was denied.

*84In 2005 Pastor-Alvarez filed another § 2241 petition, this time arguing that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment under *United States v. Booker,*548 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). According to Pastor-Alvarez, this is a structural error which he may raise under § 2241 because AEDPA’s restrictions on the filing of second or successive § 2255 motions render § 2255 “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” *See*28 U.S.C. § 2255 1Í5. The District Court disagreed, dismissing the motion for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized § 2255 motion. The court also declined to transfer it to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to be treated as an application to file a second § 2255 motion. Nevertheless, the court’s dismissal of the petition was without prejudice to Pastor-Alvarez’s filing his own application. This appeal followed.

As the District Court correctly explained, Pastor-Alvarez’s claim falls squarely within § 2255. Although we have held that in certain limited circumstances § 2255 may be considered “inadequate or ineffective,” *In re Dorsainvil,*119 F.3d 245 (3d Cir.1997), we have emphasized that this exception is very narrow. A petitioner may not resort to § 2241 instead of § 2255 unless he had no prior opportunity to challenge his conviction for actions which an intervening change in the law potentially decriminalized. *Okereke v. United States,*307 F.3d 117, 120 (3d Cir. 2002). Like *Apprendi*(the decision underlying the petitioner’s argument in *Oker-eke*), *Booker*has no such effect on Pastor-Alvarez’s conviction.

Because the appeal presents no substantial question,1 we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court.

1

. The District Court did not err in declining to transfer Pastor-Alvarez’s petition to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to be treated as an application for leave to file a second § 2255 motion. The Supreme Court has not held that *Booker*applies retroactively to cases on collateral review, and none of its decisions, read together, mandate such a result. *See Tyler v. Cain,*533 U.S. 656, 121 S.Ct. 2478, 150 L.Ed.2d 632 (2001); *In re Olopade,*403 F.3d 159 (3d Cir.2005).f
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLOTTE YEE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

U.S. SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C08-04259 MMC (JCS)

ORDER TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENTS IN .PDF

FORMAT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in addition to the submission of paper copy of settlement

conference statements to chambers, each party shall submit their confidential settlement conference

statements in .pdf format and email their statement to JCSPO@cand.uscourts.gov.

All other provisions of this Court's original Notice and Settlement Conference Order remain

in effect.

Dated: February 8, 2010

_______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04259-MMC Document 172 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4359 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4359

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Benzenesulfonyl    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          chloride (CAS No.                                                 12/31/2016
                          98-09-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2904.10.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Robert H. Burack et al., Appellants, v. Harold T. Garrity et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellants for a stay of all proceedings in the action including examination of plaintiffs before trial granted, on condition that appellants argue or submit the appeals at the November term, beginning October 31, 1960. The appeals are ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must he served and filed on or before October 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register: May 25, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 101)]
[Notices]               
[Page 30306]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25my11-24]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Montana State Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning and 
orientation meeting of the Montana Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene via teleconference at 2 p.m. (MDT) and adjourn at 
approximately 4 p.m. (MDT) on Wednesday, June 29, 2011. The purpose of 
the planning meeting is to provide ethics training and orientation to 
the new committee. The Committee will also be briefed on activities by 
the Commission, as well as other SACs in the region.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (800) 516-9896, followed by Conference 
ID: 8334. Any interested member of the public may call this 
number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges 
for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will 
not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number. For persons with hearing impairments, dial 711 for relay 
services and enter 1-800-516-9896 followed by the Conference 
ID: 8334.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by July 27, 2011. 
Comments may be mailed to the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 999-18th Street, Suite 1380S, Denver, CO 
80202, or faxed to (303) 866-1050, or e-mailed to ebohor@usccr.gov. 
Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office by e-mail at ebohor@usccr.gov or by phone at 
(303) 866-1040.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 19, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-12923 Filed 5-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
NO. 07-10-00052-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JUNE 4, 2010

TOM UPCHURCH, JR., WAYNE B. BARFIELD AND WAYNE B. BARFIELD, P.C., APPELLANTS

v.

COLLIN J. FOWLER AND BARBARA SUE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF WILLIAM JAMES FOWLER, DECEASED, JOE ROMO AND FLOYD TUTSON, APPELLEES 

 FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 79,998-A; HONORABLE EDWARD LEE SELF, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appellants, Tom Upchurch, Jr., Wayne B. Barfield, and Wayne B. Barfield, P.C., have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of their notice of appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  Id.  All costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).  If dismissal will prevent appellees from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellees to file a timely motion for rehearing.  No motion for rehearing from appellants will be entertained.

								Mackey K. Hancock

									Justice

2

2
Exhibit
32.1





Section
1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ JAMES H. LONG
              James
      H. Long
                  Chief
      Executive Officer





November
12, 2009
224 A.2d 903.

#### Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation *vs.*Joseph Oliveira.

DECEMBER 15, 1966.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin. and Kelleher, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is an employer’s petition to review a decree granting the employee partial compensation. It was heard before a single commissioner wlm suspended further payments after findings that the employee had recovered from the effects of his injury, was no longer incapacitated, and could return to his former work. The case is here on the employee’s appeal from a decree of the full commission affirming the order and the findings of the trial commissioner.

Notwithstanding an abundance of credible evidence supportive of the conclusion that the employee was still incapacitated by reason of his injury and therefore unable to return to his former work, the record also contains some competent evidence upon which the full commission’s affirmation of the trial commissioner’s findings of fact can rest. In those circumstances we have been precluded by the legislature, absent fraud, from disturbing those findings. *Carr*v. *General Insulated Wire Works, Inc.,*100 R. I. 203, 213 A.2d 700; *United States Rubber Co.*v. *Marino,*97 R. I. *488142, 196 A.2d 169; *Barnes*v. *Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.,*96 R. I. 469.

*Carroll, Kelly & Murphy, Ambrose W. Carroll,*for petitioner.

*Abedon, Michaelson, Stanzler & Biener, Richard A.. Skolnik,*for respondent.

The respondent’s appeal is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the workmen’s compensation commission for further proceedings.
#### § 308.2 Policy.

It is the policy of the Peace Corps to protect, preserve and defend the right of privacy of any individual as to whom the agency maintains personal information in any records system and to provide appropriate and complete access to such records including adequate opportunity to correct any errors in said records. It is further the policy of the agency to maintain its records in such a fashion that the information contained therein is and remains material and relevant to the purposes for which it is collected in order to maintain its records with fairness to the individuals who are the subject of such records.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
William J. Hannigan, certify that:

Date:
August 14, 2003

|/s/WILLIAM J. HANNIGANWilliam J. Hannigan
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Sabre Holdings Corporation and will be retained by Sabre Holdings
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

*
Text omitted in accordance with interim guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Release No. 33-8238.

---

QuickLinks
#### (A) Lee G. Hawkins v. Haiss Realty Co., Inc., et al. (B) Charles Cooperman v. Fairsex Novelty Co. et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
#### § 239.13 Change in agreements.

No Noteholder will consent to any change or waiver of any provision of any document contemplated by the Guarantee without the prior written consent of USAID.
#### § 507.1 General policies.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors will provide the public with the fullest practical information regarding its decision making process while protecting the rights of individuals and its abilities to carry out its responsibilities.
### §300bb–4. Applicable premium

For purposes of this subchapter—

#### (1) In general

The term "applicable premium" means, with respect to any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries, the cost to the plan for such period of the coverage for similarly situated beneficiaries with respect to whom a qualifying event has not occurred (without regard to whether such cost is paid by the employer or employee).

#### (2) Special rule for self-insured plans

To the extent that a plan is a self-insured plan—

#### (A) In general

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the applicable premium for any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries shall be equal to a reasonable estimate of the cost of providing coverage for such period for similarly situated beneficiaries which—

(i) is determined on an actuarial basis, and

(ii) takes into account such factors as the Secretary may prescribe in regulations.

#### (B) Determination on basis of past cost

If a plan administrator elects to have this subparagraph apply, the applicable premium for any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries shall be equal to—

(i) the cost to the plan for similarly situated beneficiaries for the same period occurring during the preceding determination period under paragraph (3), adjusted by

(ii) the percentage increase or decrease in the implicit price deflator of the gross national product (calculated by the Department of Commerce and published in the Survey of Current Business) for the 12-month period ending on the last day of the sixth month of such preceding determination period.

#### (C) Subparagraph (B) not to apply where significant change

A plan administrator may not elect to have subparagraph (B) apply in any case in which there is any significant difference, between the determination period and the preceding determination period, in coverage under, or in employees covered by, the plan. The determination under the preceding sentence for any determination period shall be made at the same time as the determination under paragraph (3).

#### (3) Determination period

The determination of any applicable premium shall be made for a period of 12 months and shall be made before the beginning of such period.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXII, §2204, as added Pub. L. 99–272, title X, §10003(a), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 234.)
§ 304.12 Action on approved claim. ( a ) Payment of a claim approved under this subpart is contingent on claimant's execution of ( 1 ) a “Claim for Damage or Injury,” Standard From 95; and
( 2 ) a “Voucher for Payment,” Standard Form 1145, as appropriate. When a claimant is represented by an attorney, the voucher for payment shall designate the claimant and his attorney as copayees, and the check shall be delivered to the attorney, whose address shall appear on the voucher.
( b ) Acceptance by the claimant, his agent, or legal representative of an award, compromise, or settlement made under section 2672 or 2677 of title 28, United States Code, is final and conclusive on the claimant, his agent or legal representative, and any other person on whose behalf or for whose benefit the claim has been presented, and constitutes a complete release of any claim against the United States and against any officer or employee of the Government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim, by reason of the same subject matter.