alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Adminstration

          - [Notice 04-148] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Robotic and Human Exploration of Mars Strategic Roadmapping Committee. 

# DATES:

Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Thursday, January 6, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Pacific standard time. 

# ADDRESSES:

Spitzer Science Center/Keith Spalding, Room 410, 200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Tracey Abbott at (818) 393-7106. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the meeting room. Attendees will be requested to sign a register. 

The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 

—Mars science: What we know today. 

—Science planning for exploring Mars. 

—Overview of robotic science missions. 

—Challenges of Mars robotic and human exploration. 

—Human mission studies, options, and technology needs. 

—Key issues to be studied. 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 04-27890 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
### §4370m–3. Interstate compacts

#### (a) In general

The consent of Congress is given for 3 or more contiguous States to enter into an interstate compact establishing regional infrastructure development agencies to facilitate authorization and review of covered projects, under State law or in the exercise of delegated permitting authority described under section 4370m–5 of this title, that will advance infrastructure development, production, and generation within the States that are parties to the compact.

#### (b) Regional infrastructure

For the purpose of this subchapter, a regional infrastructure development agency referred to in subsection (a) shall have the same authorities and responsibilities of a State agency.

(Pub. L. 114–94, div. D, title XLI, §41004, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1755.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act, also known as the FAST Act, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.
#### (A) Premier Knitting Co., Inc. v. Emmott Valley Transportation Co., Inc. (B) Joan Dorfman et al. v. Julius Schoenfeld. (C) Corinne Sonnenberg v. Herman J. Sonnenberg. (D) Morris Blander v. Shirley Blander.

[In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ Document 96 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ Document 96 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 2
### §246a. Bureau of State Services management fund; establishment; advancements; availability

For the purpose of facilitating the economical and efficient conduct of operations in the Bureau of State Services which are financed by two or more appropriations where the costs of operation are not readily susceptible of distribution as charges to such appropriations, there is established the Bureau of State Services management fund. Such amounts as the Secretary may determine to represent a reasonable distribution of estimated costs among the various appropriations involved may be advanced each year to this fund and shall be available for expenditure for such costs under such regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary: Provided, That funds advanced to this fund shall be available only in the fiscal year in which they are advanced: Provided further, That final adjustments of advances in accordance with actual costs shall be effected wherever practicable with the appropriations from which such funds are advanced.

(Pub. L. 86–703, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 765; Pub. L. 91–515, title II, §282, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1308.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–515 substituted "Secretary" for "Surgeon General" wherever appearing.
#### § 512.15 Referrals to the Department of Justice or the General Accounting Office.

Referrals to the Department of Justice or the General Accounting Office shall be made in accordance with the standards set forth in part 105 of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (4 CFR part 105).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 905 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communitycorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), W. Roger Crook,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

    1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12 2002                    By:     /s/ W. Roger Crook
                                            ----------------------
                                                      W. Roger Crook
                                              Its: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

Certification

Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  | 
|November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach   
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Contrary to AMD’s assertion, the mere fact that Samsung has voluntarily produced some

licenses outside the hypothetical negotiation period does not weigh in favor of compelling production

of the four licenses now requested.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants,

 v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, et al.,

Defendants and Counterclaimants.

 /

No. C 08-00986 SI

ORDER DENYING AMD’S MOTION TO

COMPEL LICENSE AGREEMENTS

Plaintiff AMD has filed a motion to compel Samsung to produce all license agreements relating

to the patents-in-suit or to technology comparable to the technology at issue in this case for the purpose

of calculating damages based on a reasonable royalty. Four specific licenses are at issue in this case.

The Nanya and Toshiba licenses are “broad, portfolio-level cross-licenses.” The Interdigital and

Rambus licenses are settlement agreements reached in connection with pending litigation. 

The hypothetical negotiation dates in this case range from some time in 1998 to September of

2004. The agreements AMD presently seeks were entered into from December 2007 to February 2010

– three to five-and-a-half years after the latest hypothetical negotiation date. In the Court’s view, AMD

is not entitled to discovery of agreements this far removed from the relevant time period, especially in

light of the fact that Samsung has already produced 120 licenses spanning the period from 1990 to

2006.1

 In addition, Samsung has explained that the two broad-level cross-licenses and the two

settlement agreements are substantially different in scope and substance from the single-patent licenses

Case 3:08-cv-00986-SI Document 374 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that will be relevant to the royalty calculations in this case. That fact further weighs against compelling

discovery of the agreements. AMD’s motion to compel is therefore DENIED.

To the extent Samsung seeks discovery from AMD of license agreements similar to those at

issue in this order, that request is also DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00986-SI Document 374 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than January 3, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Midwestone Financial Group, Inc., and Midwestone Financial Group 
ESOP, both of Oskaloosa, Iowa; to retain MidWestOne Investments 
Services, Inc., Oskaloosa, Iowa, and thereby continue to engage in 
financial and investment advisory services and securities brokerage 
services, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 14, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-27729 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Julie V. Loew v. Erling C. Olsen.

— Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
§ 35.20 Disclosure of documents. ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review any relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint and upon which the findings and conclusions of the investigating official under § 35.4(b) are based, unless such materials are subject to a privilege under federal law or classified pursuant to Executive Order. Upon payment of fees for duplication, the defendant may obtain copies of such documents.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant also may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint, even if it is contained in a document that would otherwise be privileged. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only that portion containing exculpatory information must be disclosed.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official as described in § 35.5 is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) The defendant may file a motion to compel disclosure of the documents subject to the provisions of this section. Such a motion may only be filed with the ALJ following the filing of an answer pursuant to § 35.9.
### §2991g. Records and audits

(a) Each agency which receives financial assistance under this subchapter shall keep such records as the Commissioner may prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by that agency of such financial assistance, the total cost of the project in connection with which such financial assistance is given or used, the amount of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(b) The Commissioner and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of any agency which receives financial assistance under this subchapter that are pertinent to the financial assistance received under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §809, formerly §808, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §11, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2325; renumbered §809, Pub. L. 100–175, title V, §502(3), Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 973; amended Pub. L. 102–375, title VIII, §822(9), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1298.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 809 of Pub. L. 88–452 was renumbered section 810 and is classified to section 2991h of this title.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 102–375 substituted "Commissioner" for "Secretary".
S A N

O N O F R E

B L U F F

San Onofre

Beach

Foley

Canyon

SCE San Onofre

Heliport

San Onofre

Nuclear Power Plant

Agra

G U L F

O F

S A N T A

C A T A L I N A

Pacific

Ocean

P A C I F I C

O C E A N

XW5

XW5

3681

3682

3683

3684

3685

3686

3687

3688

3689

3690

3691

3692

3680

3693000mN

3681

3682

3683

3684

3685

3686

3687

3688

3689

3690

3691

3680000mN

3692

442 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453000mE

442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452

000mE 453

6 680 000 FEET

6 710 000 FEET

1 550 000 FEET

1 590 000 FEET

17'30"

20'

17'30"

20'

35' 32'30"

117°37'30" 35' 32'30"

117°37'30"

33°22'30" 33°22'30"

117°30'

117°30'

33°15' 33°15'

SCALE 1:24 000

FEET

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

MILES

1 0.5 0 1

METERS

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

1000 500 0 1000 2000

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

6 7 8

4 5

1 2 3 1 Dana Point

2 San Clemente

3 Margarita Peak

4

5 Las Pulgas Canyon

6

7

8 Oceanside

U.S. National Grid

MS

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

11S

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route

US Route

State Route

XW Interstate Route ./ US Route OP State Route

Local Road

THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 2008-1068

VERSION 1.0

SAN ONOFRE BLUFF, CA

2007

CALIFORNIA

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PRODUCT TO SUPPORT AGENCIES RESPONDING TO CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES

THIS PRODUCT IS RELEASED ON CONDITION THAT NEITHER THE USGS NOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ITS AUTHORIZED OR UNAUTHORIZED USE

PRELIMINARY IMAGE MAP OF THE 2007 AMMO FIRE PERIMETER, SAN ONOFRE BLUFF QUADRANGLE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

BY

Perry S. Clark, Wendy S. Scratch, Gaylord W. Bias, Gregory B. Stander, Jenne L. Sexton, and Bridgette J. Krawczak

2007

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET UTM GRID AND 2007 MAGNETIC NORTH

! !

! ! ! ! ! !

Ù

MN

228 MILS

12°40 ́ GN

6 MILS

0°19 ́

× Produced by the United States Geological Survey

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Projection and

1 000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 11S

10 000-foot grid ticks: California Coordinate System of 1983 (zone 6)

Imagery .................. Digital Orthophoto Quadrangle ........................ USGS, 2005

Transportation ................................................................................ Tele Atlas, 2007

Names ......................................... Geographic Names Information System, 2006

Fire Perimeter Data ....................................................GeoMAC, October 27, 2007

Ammo Fire perimeter data were acquired as the best available data

These data may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards

Road centerlines, road classification, route numbers, and street names © Tele Atlas 2007

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only

and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certificationof Periodic Financial Report**

 

Harold G. Giomi and Jack B.Buchold hereby certify as follows:

 

1.               They are the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer, respectively, of The Bank Holdings.

 

2.               The Form 10-QSB of The Bank Holdings for theQuarter Ended September 30, 2005 complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))and the information contained in the report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TheBank Holdings.

 

 
| Date:  | November 14, 2005        |                                    | /s/ Hal  Giomi       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |                     | THE BANK  HOLDINGS                      |
|   |                     | Harold G.  Giomi                        |
|   |                     | Chairman  & Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                     |                                    |                 |
|   |                     |                                    |                 |
| Date:  | November 14, 2005        |                                    | /s/ Jack B.  Buchold |   |
|   | THE BANK  HOLDINGS       |
|   | Jack B.  Buchold         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|        |                          |                                         |                      |        |  |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00709

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.M., A CHILD

,

From the 57t h Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- PA

- 02894 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on November 27, 2017. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Furthermore, on November 13, 2017, this court ordered appellant to file the docketing statement for this appeal by November 27, 2017. Neither the docketing statement nor a motion for extension of time has been filed.

We order Manuel Rodriguez, appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney, to file appellant’s brief and the docketing statement by December 14, 2017 . Appellant is advised that no extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. The

cour t does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance. If the brief and the docketing statement are not filed by the date ordered, the court may abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to dete rmine whether appellant or counsel has abandoned this appeal. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN . § 107.013(a)(1) (giving indigent persons a right to counsel in parental

- rights termination cases); In re M.S. , 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003) (holding that this right to counsel includes the right to effective counsel)

.

__________________ _______________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of December, 2017

.

____________ _______________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court