alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§5091 to 5091n. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §385, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 915

Section 5091, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §701, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3172, set forth purpose of this subchapter.

Section 5091a, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §702, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3173, authorized Federal grants for Youthbuild projects.

Section 5091b, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §703, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3173, related to service in construction and rehabilitation projects.

Section 5091c, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §704, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3174, related to education and job training services.

Section 5091d, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §705, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3174, set forth permitted uses of funds provided under this subchapter.

Section 5091e, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §706, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3175, set forth eligibility requirements for participants.

Section 5091f, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §707, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3175, provided living allowance for full-time program participants.

Section 5091g, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §708, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3176, directed that services and activities be carried out through arrangements or under contracts with certain entities.

Section 5091h, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §709, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3176, directed prescribing of standards for evaluating performance of projects.

Section 5091i, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §710, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3176, related to applications for grants.

Section 5091j, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §711, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3177, set forth criteria for selection of projects.

Section 5091k, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §712, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3177, authorized management and technical assistance for projects.

Section 5091l, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §713, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3178, defined terms for purposes of this subchapter.

Section 5091m, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §715, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3179; amended Pub. L. 102–10, §10, Mar. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 32, directed issuance of necessary regulations.

Section 5091n, Pub. L. 93–113, title VII, §716, as added Pub. L. 101–610, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3179, authorized appropriations to carry out this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Subchapter repealed effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 392 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 4951 of this title.
2/15/2015

– Version 1.1 SkyFire Services, LLC 

### sUAS MISSION PLANNING WORKSHEET

Date/Time:

_____________________________ Launch Loc ation

(Lat/Lon /MSL ): ________________________ _

WX C onditions:

speed/dir

_____________________________ Sky Conditions:

Cover/smoke /haze

________________________ _

PIC:

_____________________________ Observer(s):

_________________________

Mission

Specialists:

_____________________________________________________________________ ___ _

Mission Objectives:

Operating area

identified on chart VFR charts:

Identified Hazards &

Mitigation :

Emergency Landing

Locations /Rally

Points :

Special Conditions:

Preflight Briefing

Completed Y / N WX Briefing

Completed Y/N Preflight Checklist

Completed Y / N

Mission Notes



###  If additional notes needed, use ICS 214 Unit Log

Post Flight Checklist

Complete: Y / N Flight Duration: Battery Mah Used:

_______________________ ____________
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 254

To provide for the establishment of a task force within the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics to gather information about, study, and report to the Congress 

regarding, incidents of abandonment of infant children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a task force within 

the Bureau of Justice Statistics to gather information 

about, study, and report to the Congress regarding, incidents of abandonment of infant children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baby Abandonment 

5 Prevention Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 254 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF TASK FORCE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General, acting 

3 through the Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

4 shall establish a task force (to be known as the Task Force 

5 on Baby Abandonment) to carry out the following: 

6 (1) Collecting information from State and local 

7 law enforcement agencies and child welfare agencies 

8 regarding incidents of abandonment of an infant 

9 child by a parent of that child. 

10 (2) Maintaining that information in a com11 prehensive database. 

12 (3) Studying that information and making find13 ings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding 

14 that information. 

15 (4) Submitting reports in accordance with this 

16 section. 

17 (b) INFORMATION INCLUDED.—The information re18 ferred to in subsection (a) shall include information with 

19 respect to the following: 

20 (1) The prevalence of such incidents. 

21 (2) The demographics of such children and 

22 such parents. 

23 (3) The factors that influence the decision of 

24 such parents to abandon such children. 
3

•HR 254 IH 

1 (4) The circumstances surrounding such aban2 donments, including the time, place, and manner of 

3 such abandonments. 

4 (5) The outcomes for such children and such 

5 parents after such abandonments. 

6 (6) Trends and variations in the matters set 

7 forth in paragraphs (1) through (5). 

8 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘infant 

9 child’’ means a child not more than 12 months of age. 

10 (d) REPORTS.—Not later than one year after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the 

12 task force shall submit a report to the Congress detailing 

13 its methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommenda14 tions.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 217
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 217.8 Notice. ( a ) A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall take appropriate initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants, and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, and unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient that it does not discriminate on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504, and this part. The notification shall state, where appropriate, that the recipient does not discriminate in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs or activities. The notification shall also include an identification of the responsible employee designated pursuant to § 217.7(a). A recipient shall make the initial notification required by this paragraph within 90 days of the effective date of this part. Methods of initial and continuing notification may include the posting of notices, publication in newspapers and magazines, placement of notices in recipients' publication, and distribution of memoranda or other written communications.
( b ) If a recipient publishes or uses recruitment materials or publications containing general information that it makes available to participants, beneficiaries, applicants, or employees, it shall include in those materials or publications a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section. A recipient may meet the requirement of this paragraph either by including appropriate inserts in existing materials and publications or by revising and reprinting the materials and publications.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank E. Brillian, Appellant, v. Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Wyoming County Court dismissing the writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to the custody of the Warden of Attica Prison.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### Henry Martin Company, Respondent, v. George C. Taylor, as President, etc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Kruse, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal.
### §4224. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §101(b), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2237

Section, Pub. L. 90–577, title III, §304, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1102, provided that the Secretary of any department or the administrative head of any agency of the executive branch of the Federal Government furnish annually to the respective Committees on Government Operations of the Senate and House of Representatives a summary report on the scope of the services provided under the administration of this subchapter.
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

MARJORIE ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

TAMALPAIS COMMUNITY SERVICES

DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-2354 VRW 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR

TELEPHONICALLY AT ENE

Date: March 2, 2010

Mediator: Dirk Schenkkan

Defendant Special District Risk Management Authority has submitted a request for the

representative of its insurance carrier, Brokers’ Risk Placement Service, Inc., to appear

telephonically at the March 2, 2010 ENE session with evaluator Dirk Schenkkan. Defendant has not

made a showing that the insurance carrier representative’s personal attendance at the ENE session

would impose an extraordinary or otherwise unjustifiable hardship as required under ADR L.R. 5-

10(d). Accordingly, the request is DENIED and the insurance representative shall appear at the

ENE session in person.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 22, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02354-VRW Document 106 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 1
### §5159. Protection of environment

An action which is taken or assistance which is provided pursuant to section 5170a, 5170b, 5172, 5173, or 5192 of this title, including such assistance provided pursuant to the procedures provided for in section 5189 of this title, which has the effect of restoring a facility substantially to its condition prior to the disaster or emergency, shall not be deemed a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 852) [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.]. Nothing in this section shall alter or affect the applicability of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to other Federal actions taken under this chapter or under any other provisions of law.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §316, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(m)(1), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4694.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of this title and Tables.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 316 of Pub. L. 93–288 was classified to section 5156 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–707.
### §3013a. Consultation with State agencies, area agencies on aging, and Native American grant recipients

The Assistant Secretary shall consult and coordinate with State agencies, area agencies on aging, and recipients of grants under subchapter X in the development of Federal goals, regulations, program instructions, and policies under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title II, §203A, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title II, §204, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1211; amended Pub. L. 103–171, §3(a)(13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–171 substituted "Assistant Secretary" for "Commissioner".
### §290cc–32. Prohibition against certain false statements

#### (a) In general

(1) A person may not knowingly make or cause to be made any false statement or representation of a material fact in connection with the furnishing of items or services for which amounts may be paid by a State from payments received by the State under section 290cc–21 of this title.

(2) A person with knowledge of the occurrence of any event affecting the right of the person to receive any amounts from payments made to the State under section 290cc–21 of this title may not conceal or fail to disclose any such event with the intent of securing such an amount that the person is not authorized to receive or securing such an amount in an amount greater than the amount the person is authorized to receive.

#### (b) Criminal penalty for violation of prohibition

Any person who violates a prohibition established in subsection (a) may for each violation be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §532, as added Pub. L. 100–77, title VI, §611(3), July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 521; amended Pub. L. 101–645, title V, §511, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–645 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to prohibition against certain false statements for provisions relating to failure to comply with agreements.
April 16, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ   Document 77   Filed 04/16/10   Page 1 of 1
§ 505.7 Correction or amendment of record. ( a ) You have the right to request that we amend a record pertaining to you which you believe is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. At the time we grant access to a record, we will furnish guidelines for you to request amendment to the record.
( b ) Requests for amendments to records must be in writing and mailed or delivered to the FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, FOIA/Privacy Act Office, Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, Suite 3349, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20237, who will coordinate the review of the request to amend the record with the appropriate office(s). Such requests must contain, at a minimum, identifying information needed to locate the record, a brief description of the item or items of information to be amended, and the reason for the requested change. The requester should submit as much documentation, arguments or other data as seems warranted to support the request for amendment.
( c ) We will review all requests for amendments to records within 20 working days of receipt of the request and either make the changes or inform you of our refusal to do so and the reasons.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ANSI Accredited Standards Committee ``C119''

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ANSI Accredited Standards 
Committee ``C119'' (``C119 Committee''), by its Secretariat, National 
Electrical Manufacturers Association (``NEMA''), has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI 
Accredited Standards Committee ``C119'', Rosslyn, VA. The nature and 
scope of C119 Committee's standards development activities are: related 
to electrical connectors for electric utility applications. C119 
Committee currently maintains four standards relating to electrical 
connectors used by the electric utility industry. The standards 
developed by C119 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27544 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dontay Beckwith, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 897]

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered July 13, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree under Indictment No. 99-00134, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered July 13, 1999, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court under Superior Court Information No. 98-00366, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michelle L. Del Vecchio, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 256]

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated, motion to suppress granted in part and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the indictment in ac*928cordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of criminal mischief in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 145.00 [1]) and other crimes entered upon a plea of guilty after her suppression motion was denied. Defendant was the passenger in a vehicle stopped by a Deputy Sheriff on North Main Street in Canandaigua on November 17, 1998 one-half hour after a reported larceny at the Bloomfield Car Wash in Holcomb. Following the stop, defendant was briefly questioned and subjected to a frisk search. A showup identification procedure was conducted, and the driver of the vehicle was arrested. The vehicle was then searched, and defendant was further questioned.

We reject defendant’s contention thatxthe stop was illegal *(see, People v Daniels,*275 AD2d 1006). The court erred, however, in denying that part of defendant’s motion seeking suppression of the evidence seized during the frisk search. Defendant was not suspected of a “serious and violent crime [such] as robbery or * * * burglary” *(People v Mack,*26 NY2d 311, 317, *cert denied*400 US 960) or “a crime involving potentially dangerous instruments” *(People v Burks,*235 AD2d 373, 374, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1033), and the Deputy failed to articulate a reason justifying the frisk search *(see, People v Barriera,*191 AD2d 153, 155, *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 1040). Defendant does not contend that any other evidence should be suppressed as the fruit of that illegal frisk search. Thus, we reverse the judgment, vacate the plea, grant defendant’s motion to suppress in part by suppressing the evidence seized during the frisk search and remit the matter to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Mischief, 4th Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Kehoe and Bálio, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Mark Shaplo et al., Appellants, v Irving Kizner, Respondent, and Joseph J. Previte et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent Irving Kizner as a candidate in the election to be held on May 3, 1977, for the public position of Member of the New York City Community School Board, District 27, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court,. Queens County, dated April 12, 1977, which, after a hearing, (1) denied the application and (2) directed the board of elections to place respondent Kizner’s name upon the appropriate ballot. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted; the board of elections is directed to remove the name of Irving Kizner from the ballot in question. The candidate’s designating petitions were challenged because a subscribing witness, on four separate sheets, omitted to put her last year of registration thereon. Special Term held a *601hearing at which the subscribing witness testified that she had omitted the year of her last registration simply because she was not careful. However, she did testify that she had been registered in 1976. In our opinion, the omission rendered the signatures invalid. The requirements of subdivision 3 of section 135 of the Election Law must be strictly complied with (see *Matter of Rutter v Coveney,*51 AD2d 1049, affd 38 NY2d 993). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.