alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.53 Uncertified foreign health-care workers. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a consular officer must not issue a visa to any alien seeking admission to the United States for the purpose of performing services in a health care occupation, other than as a physician, unless, in addition to meeting all other requirements of law and regulation, the alien provides to the officer a certification issued by the Commission On Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS) or another credentialing service that has been approved by the Secretary of Homeland Security for such purpose, which certificate complies with the provisions of sections 212(a)(5)(C) and 212(r) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(5)(C) and 8 U.S.C. 1182(r), respectively, and the regulations found at 8 CFR 212.15.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to an alien: ( 1 ) Seeking to enter the United States in order to perform services in a non-clinical health care occupation as described in 8 CFR 212.15(b)(1); or
( 2 ) Who is the immigrant or nonimmigrant spouse or child of a foreign health care worker and who is seeking to accompany or follow to join as a derivative applicant the principal alien to whom this section applies; or
( 3 ) Who is applying for an immigrant or a nonimmigrant visa for any purpose other than for the purpose of seeking entry into the United States in order to perform health care services as described in 8 CFR 212.15.
[67 FR 77159, Dec. 17, 2002]
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III
1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

SUBJECT: Baghurst Drive Public Meeting Summary

FROM: Lorie Baker, NPL Coordinator Hazardous Sites Cleanup Division (3HS12)

TO: File

A public meeting to announce the Baghurst Drive proposal to the NPL was held on June 26, 2014, at the Upper Salford Township Municipal Build ing in Salford, Pennsylvania. Several local residents were in attendance along with town ship supervisors, staff from Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH), Pennsylvani a Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Also, a reporter from a local newspaper, the Lansdale Reporter , and the communications dire ctor for State Senator Bob Mensch were present.

Larry Johnson, the EPA Community Involve ment Coordinator (CIC), led off with a brief introduction of the purpose of the meeting and also introduced key personnel. Charlie Root, the EPA Remedial Project Manager then spoke about the NPL and Superfund process. He explained that the site was “proposed” to th e National Priorities List (NPL) and that we are currently in a 60-day public comment period that allows the pu blic to comment on the proposed listing. He also explained that if there were no significant comments opposing listing, then the site would most likely become final on the NPL around Octobe r of this year. Stephanie Wenning, the EPA On-Scene Coordinator also spoke about assessing th e site to determine if an immediate threat exists that would require an action - in this ca se, a more permanent solution for the residents to

receive clean water.

Mr. Johnson also explained to the resi dents how they could form a Community Action Group (CAG) to give them a forum to discuss their issu es and concerns with the remediation process. He also explained the possibili ty of using a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) or Technical Assistance Services for Communities (TASC) to hi re a professional to help review reports and walk the community through the Superfund process.

Questions from the community focused on th e short-term issue of getting a clean water source to those residents with contaminated wells, th e effect of the Superfund listing on home resale values, risks associated with the contaminants found in the drinking water, and how the site might be remediated and time frame for complete cleanup.

The community asked no questions on the actual Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scoring of the site. Mr Johnson encourag ed the community to comment on whether they supported NPL listing and explained how comments on the proposal could be submitted to EPA as specified on a

Fact Sheet that was distributed to th e local residents.
[EXHIBIT 99.1]


       Written Statement of the G. Robert Tatum, III
                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

    Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
I, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of BEVsystems
International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/G. Robert Tatum, III
--------------------------
G. Robert Tatum, III
August 14, 2002
### §3371. Assistance for housing in Alaska

#### (a) Loans and grants; authorization; purposes

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") may make loans and grants on the basis of need to the regional native housing authorities duly constituted under the laws of the State of Alaska for the purpose of providing planning assistance, housing rehabilitation, and maintaining an adequate administrative structure in conjunction with the provision of housing and related facilities for Alaska residents.

#### (b) Amount of grants

Grants under this section shall not exceed 75 per centum of the aggregate cost of the housing and related facilities to be constructed under an approved program, except that the Secretary may make a grant in excess of such limitation in any case, after consultation with State officials.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $10,000,000 to carry out the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 89–754, title X, §1004, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 91–152, title II, §220, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 390; Pub. L. 95–557, title IX, §904, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–557, §904(a), revised subsec. (a) generally to require that the Department of Housing and Urban Development make loans and grants, on the basis of need, to regional Alaska Native housing authorities for certain planning, administrative, and other expenses in conjunction with the provision of housing and related facilities for Alaska residents.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–557, §904(b), inserted "except that the Secretary may make a grant in excess of such limitation in any case, after consultation with State officials".

1969—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–152 substituted "$10,875" for "$7,500".
#### § 401.8 Decision by the whole Commission.

The whole Commission shall consider and determine any matter or question which the Treaty or any other treaty or international agreement, either in terms or by implication, requires or makes it the duty of the Commission to determine. For the purposes of this section and § 401.7, “the whole Commission” means all of the commissioners appointed pursuant to Article VII of the Treaty whose terms of office have not expired and who are not prevented by serious illness or other circumstances beyond their control from carrying out their functions as commissioners. In no event shall a decision be made without the concurrence of at least four commissioners.
#### § 235.12 Prosecution of claims.

After payment by USAID to an Applicant hereunder, USAID shall have exclusive power to prosecute all claims related to rights to receive payments under the Eligible Notes to which it is thereby subrogated. If a Noteholder continues to have an interest in the outstanding Eligible Notes, such a Noteholder and USAID shall consult with each other with respect to their respective interests in such Eligible Notes and the manner of and responsibility for prosecuting claims.
ex10b.htm




 











 Exhibit 10(b)




AMENDMENT TO


KAMAN CORPORATION 2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


(Adopted on October 12, 2010)







The Kaman Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 16(h)(ii)(A) is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


A)           the vesting periods of any and all Incentive Stock Options, Non Statutory Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Stock Units granted and outstanding under the Plan shall immediately be accelerated;


 







 


2. Except as otherwise expressly provided by the preceding paragraphs, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan shall remain the same, and Plan, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joel Adrian REYES, Appellant.

No. 06-3731-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 5, 2007.

Irma B. Ascher, New York, NY, for Appellant.

Michael Farbiarz, Assistant United States Attorney (Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, Hon. CHESTER J. STRAUB, Hon. B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Defendant Joel Adrian Reyes appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to a three-count indictment charging him with distributing and possessing with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C). The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Swain, J.) sentenced Reyes principally to 37 months’ imprisonment, within the 37-46 month range set forth in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.1 Reyes argues that his sentence is unreasonable “[bjecause a shorter term of imprisonment would have more than fulfilled the aims of retribution, deterrence, protection of the public and rehabilitation, as well as the other aims of [18 U.S.C. § ] 3553(a).” We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and issues presented for review.

*42“The weight to be afforded any given argument made pursuant to one of the § 3553(a) factors is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review, as long as the sentence ultimately imposed is reasonable in light of all the circumstances presented.” *United States v. Fernandez,*443 F.3d 19, 32 (2d Cir.2006).

The record confirms that the district court understood its *post-Booker*authority under the Guidelines. After reviewing the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553, the district court explained that the Guidelines are “advisory,” and concluded that on the facts presented, “the [GJuideline range includes a sentence that is reasonable, sufficient, and no greater than necessary to address the Section 3553(a) sentencing goals and factors.” Sent’g Tr. at 17 (Aug. 1, 2006). And we conclude that the sentence was well within the broad range of reasonable sentences that the district court could have imposed. *See Fernandez,*443 F.3d at 32.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

1

. This range included a three-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, and a two-point reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D 1.1 (b)(7). [Blue 4].
#### Roy V. Vaiano, Appellant, v Long Island Rail Road Company, Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 881]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered January 14, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict and for judgment in his favor as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendant and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury finding in favor of the defendant could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493; *Ruscito v Early,*253 AD2d 461; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
# Jornal Oficial L 16I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0774 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | L 016I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Legislação | 62.° ano18 de janeiro de 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0774

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

L 016I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Legislação

62.° ano18 de janeiro de 2019

---

| Índice | | Retificações | Página |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Retificação do Regulamento de Execução (UE) 2019/73 da Comissão, de 17 de janeiro de 2019, que institui um direito anti-dumping definitivo e estabelece a cobrança definitiva do direito provisório instituído sobre as importações de bicicletas elétricas originárias da República Popular da China ( JO L 16 de 18.1.2019 ) | 1 |

Índice

Retificações

Página

*

Retificação do Regulamento de Execução (UE) 2019/73 da Comissão, de 17 de janeiro de 2019, que institui um direito anti-dumping definitivo e estabelece a cobrança definitiva do direito provisório instituído sobre as importações de bicicletas elétricas originárias da República Popular da China ( JO L 16 de 18.1.2019 )

( JO L 16 de 18.1.2019 )

1

| PT | Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo fino são actos de gestão corrente adoptados no âmbito da política agrícola e que têm, em geral, um período de validade limitado.
  Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo negro e precedidos de um asterisco são todos os restantes. |
| --- | --- |

PT

Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo fino são actos de gestão corrente adoptados no âmbito da política agrícola e que têm, em geral, um período de validade limitado.

Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo negro e precedidos de um asterisco são todos os restantes.

---

Retificações

| 18.1.2019 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | LI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2019

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

LI 16/1

---

Retificação do Regulamento de Execução (UE) 2019/73 da Comissão, de 17 de janeiro de 2019, que institui um direito anti-dumping definitivo e estabelece a cobrança definitiva do direito provisório instituído sobre as importações de bicicletas elétricas originárias da República Popular da China

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» L 16 de 18 de janeiro de 2019
  )

Na página 135, no artigo 4.o:

o

antes de:

«O presente regulamento é obrigatório em todos os seus elementos e diretamente aplicável em todos os Estados-Membros.»,

aditar o seguinte texto:

«O presente regulamento entra em vigor no dia seguinte ao da sua publicação no Jornal Oficial da União Europeia.».

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75979-75980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27728]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.)

[[Page 75980]]

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable 
statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to 
acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to 
vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and 
nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the 
companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 13, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Whitney Holding Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana; to merge 
with Destin Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Destin Bank, both of Destin, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Frontier Holdings, LLC, Madison, Nebraska; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The 
Bank of Madison, Madison, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 14, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-27728 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 5 of 6
July 28, 2010

June 2, 2011 June 5, 2011

Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 27 Filed 07/28/10 Page 6 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-03168-EMC Document 32 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03168-EMC Document 32 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03168-EMC Document 32 Filed 03/01/10 Page 3 of 3
#### Benjamin Eisenberg, Respondent, v. Richard Wallen et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
BlowerSize

10 x 10

10 x 4

10 x 4 (Dual)

10 x 6

10 x 6 (Dual)

10 x 7

10 x 8

10 x 9

10-5/8 x 10-5/8

10-5/8 x 8

11 x 10

11 x 11

11 x 6

11 x 7

11 x 8

11 x 9

11.5 x 10

11.5 x 9

12 x 10

12 x 11

12 x 12

12 x 15

12 x 6

12 x 7

12 x 8

12 x 9

9 x 6

9 x 7

9 x 7.5

9 x 8

9 x 9
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 80 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document79 Filed07/15/10 Page1 of 3
Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document79 Filed07/15/10 Page2 of 3

15

Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 80 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1

Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer

In
connection with the quarterly report of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March, 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph
V. Vittoria, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                      
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |    |                                                                                                                                                      
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | Dated: May 16, 2011                  
| |                                      
| | /s/ Joseph V Vittoria                
| | Name: Joseph V. Vittoria             
| | Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer
| | principal executive
 officer         

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

25

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2523 

To extend the suspension of duty on ammonium bifluoride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on ammonium bifluoride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMMONIUM BIFLUORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.28.20 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ammonium bifluoride) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of Terrence M. Hammill, Appellant, v Garry L. Stanard et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Garry L. Stanard et al., Respondents, v Terrence M. Hammill, Appellant, and Oswego County Board of Elections, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[722 NYS2d 189]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Nicholson, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Election Law.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Filed Oct. 26, 2000.)
Case 3:08-cv-03630-BZ Document 140 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 214.51 Administrative review of denial for public access to records.

Any person whose request for access to an advisory committee document is denied may seek administrative review in accordance with § 212.36(c) of A.I.D. Regulation 12, 22 CFR 212.36(c).