alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Juniper Industrial Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brian Cook, Chief Executive
and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To
                                         my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                                         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
                                         for the period covered by the report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|March 30, 2020 | By: | /s/ Brian Cook                             
|-------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|               |     | Brian Cook                                 
|               |     | Chief Executive and Financial Officer      
|               |     | (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
#### Condur Affiliates v. Ronnie, Inc.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 706, 758, 768.]
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.640 Employee. ( a ) *Employee* means the employee of a recipient directly engaged in the performance of work under the award, including— ( 1 ) All direct charge employees;
( 2 ) All indirect charge employees, unless their impact or involvement in the performance of work under the award is insignificant to the performance of the award; and
( 3 ) Temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the award and who are on the recipient's payroll.
( b ) This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the recipient (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than January 4, 2005.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (Jacqueline G. Nicholas, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

*1.  Joel D. Neisen*, Burnsville, Minnesota, Jeffrey A. Neisen, Vadnais Heights, Minnesota, Timothy J. Neisen, Ormsby, Minnesota, Mary K. Laxen, Shakopee, Minnesota, and Brian J. Neisen, Sugar Land, Texas; to acquire control of Ormsby Bancshares, Inc., Ormsby, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Ormsby State Bank, Ormsby, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 15, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-27830 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
###### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intellisync Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Woodson Hobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

Dated: December 21, 2005

 
| /s/ WOODSON HOBBS                       |
|-----------------------------------------|
| **Woodson Hobbs**                       |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
225 A.2d 789.

#### Howard Apollonio *et al. vs.*Lawrence W. Kenyon. *Executor of the Will of Valecia L. Apollonio.*

JANUARY 24, 1967.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin and Kellelier, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The parties here are the same as those in the companion case of *Apollonio*v. *Kenyon,*101 R. I. 578. Following the superior court’s denial of his motion for a new trial, the proponent filed his first account as executor of the estate of Valecia L. Apollonio, in the Hopkinton Probate Court. The contestants claimed an appeal from the allowance of the account and pursuant to statute filed their reasons of appeal -in the superior court. The proponent thereafter moved to strike certain language contained in the claim of appeal on the ground it was prejudicial. His motion, being denied, the proponent is before us on his appeal from the superior court’s action taken in this regard.

Recently in *Industrial National Bank*v. *Colt,*101 R. I. 488, 224 A.2d 900, we noted that while the new rules of civil procedure in the superior court, as well as our amended rules, are designed to liberalize and facilitate the practice in this, jurisdiction, their use permits no relaxation of the well-established principle that a litigant may not obtain *599a piecemeal review oi his case. *Lancia*v. *Grossman’s of Rhode Island, Inc.,*99 R. I. 337, 207 A.2d 607; *Coen*v. *Corr,*90 R. I. 185; *Rosenfeld*v. *Rosenfeld,*51 R. I. 381; *Troy*v. *Providence Journal Co.,*43 R. I. 22; *McAuslan*v. *MoAuslan,*34 R. I. 462. The action of the superior court in denying the .proponent’s motion to strike lacks the finality which we /deem essential to the validity of an appeal under G. L. 1956, §9-24-1, as amended. This appeal is premature.

*Brosco & Brosco, Fred Brosco, Robert T. Flynn,*for appellant.

*Letts & Quinn, Daniel J. Murray, Harold B. Soloveitzik,*for appellees.

The proponent’s appeal therefore is denied without prejudice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 75347)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 30, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization (“MISMO”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: The Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization, Washington, DC. The nature and scope of MISMO's standards development activities are: to develop, promote, and maintain voluntary electronic commerce standards for electronic mortgages and for the electronic exchange of data within the commercial/multifamily and residential mortgage industries.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27547  Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §2979. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §637, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §108(m)(3), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 720; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §9(c)(5), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2314, related to special responsibilities and training programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.
§ 512.21 Hearing. ( a ) *Petition for hearing.* ( 1 ) A hearing may be requested by filing a written petition with the Director, Financial Operations Division of Broadcasting Board of Governors, or such other official as may be named in the future by the Director of Broadcasting Board of Governors, stating why the employee believes the Board's determination of the existence or amount of the debt is in error.
( 2 ) The petition must be signed by the employee and fully identify and explain with reasonable specificity all the facts, evidence and witnesses which the employee believes support his or her position.
( 3 ) The petition must be filed no later than fifteen (15) calendar days from the date the notification under § 512.20(b) was hand delivered or the date of delivery by certified mail.
( 4 ) Where petition is received after the 15 calendar day limit, Broadcasting Board of Governors will accept the petition if the employee can show that the delay was beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice.
( 5 ) If the petition is not filed within the time limit, and is not accepted pursuant to paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the employee's right to hearing will be considered waived, and salary offset will be implemented.
( b ) *Type of hearing.* ( 1 ) The form and content of the hearing will be determined by the hearing official who shall be a person outside the control or authority of Broadcasting Board of Governors.
( 2 ) The employee may represent him or herself, or may be represented by counsel.
( 3 ) The hearing official shall maintain a summary record of the hearing.
( 4 ) The hearing official will prepare a written decision which will state: ( i ) The facts purported to evidence nature and origin of the alleged debt;
( ii ) The hearing official's analysis, findings, and conclusions relative to: ( A ) The employee's and/or the Board's grounds;
( B ) The amount and the validity of the alleged debt;
( C ) The repayment schedule, if applicable.
( 5 ) The decision of the hearing official shall constitute the final administrative decision of the Board.
#### § 512.13 Exploration of compromise.

Broadcasting Board of Governors may attempt to effect compromise in accordance with the standards set forth in part 103 of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (4 CFR part 103).
#### § 1508.500 What is the purpose of the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)?

The *EPLS* is a widely available source of the most current information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered transactions.
### §2829. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–568, §6(d), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2428

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §236, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §5(f), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2297; amended Pub. L. 94–341, §2(a)(14) July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 804, set forth provisions relating to the establishment, etc., of the Intergovernmental Advisory Council on Community Services.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,471
<SECURITIES>                                   402,591
<RECEIVABLES>                                  363,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,115
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               852,492
<PP&E>                                       1,399,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                 810,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,785,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          480,163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,312
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,145,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,785,161
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,894,168
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,377,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                374,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,620
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79


</TABLE>
#### Norene Handwerger, Respondent, v Richard Handwerger, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 3, 1977, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony in the sum of $125 per week and interim counsel fees of $1,000, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, by striking the award, of counsel fees without prejudice to an application to the trial court for counsel fees, and, as modified, otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Counsel fees are awarded in a matrimonial action in order to insure that an indigent wife has legal representation *(Kann v Kami,*38 AD2d 545; Domestic Relations Law, § 237). The record indicates that the plaintiff is now gainfully employed as a teacher at a salary of $9,400 per year. Since it appears that the plaintiff has the financial means to pay her attorney, interim counsel fees should not have been awarded. *(Peltz v Peltz,*56 AD2d 519.) At trial, plaintiff may, if so advised, renew her application for counsel fees and she may recover therefor upon a showing of financial need. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Lane, Markewich and Sullivan, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Compton, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[715 NYS2d *915680]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Compton*([appeal No. 1] 277 AD2d 913 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
### §14044f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14044f was editorially reclassified as section 20708 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rubin Cortez, Appellant, v John Wilmot, as Superintendent of the Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 22,1977 in Chemung County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. The issue is whether the New York State Board of Parole may add delinquent reformatory time to a subsequent maximum expiration date imposed for a crime committed while on parole. The Court of Appeals in *Matter of Balmer v New York State Bd. of Parole*(42 NY2d 939) found that such an addition of reformatory time would violate a convict’s right to due process. We reached a similar result in *Matter of Dixon v Chairman, N. Y. State Bd. of Parole*(58 AD2d 933). Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.
### §300j–11. Indian Tribes

#### (a) In general

Subject to the provisions of subsection (b), the Administrator—

(1) is authorized to treat Indian Tribes as States under this subchapter,

(2) may delegate to such Tribes primary enforcement responsibility for public water systems and for underground injection control, and

(3) may provide such Tribes grant and contract assistance to carry out functions provided by this subchapter.

#### (b) EPA regulations

#### (1) Specific provisions

The Administrator shall, within 18 months after June 19, 1986, promulgate final regulations specifying those provisions of this subchapter for which it is appropriate to treat Indian Tribes as States. Such treatment shall be authorized only if:

(A) the Indian Tribe is recognized by the Secretary of the Interior and has a governing body carrying out substantial governmental duties and powers;

(B) the functions to be exercised by the Indian Tribe are within the area of the Tribal Government's jurisdiction; and

(C) the Indian Tribe is reasonably expected to be capable, in the Administrator's judgment, of carrying out the functions to be exercised in a manner consistent with the terms and purposes of this subchapter and of all applicable regulations.

#### (2) Provisions where treatment as State inappropriate

For any provision of this subchapter where treatment of Indian Tribes as identical to States is inappropriate, administratively infeasible or otherwise inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter, the Administrator may include in the regulations promulgated under this section, other means for administering such provision in a manner that will achieve the purpose of the provision. Nothing in this section shall be construed to allow Indian Tribes to assume or maintain primary enforcement responsibility for public water systems or for underground injection control in a manner less protective of the health of persons than such responsibility may be assumed or maintained by a State. An Indian tribe 1 shall not be required to exercise criminal enforcement jurisdiction for purposes of complying with the preceding sentence.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIV, §1451, as added Pub. L. 99–339, title III, §302(a), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 665; amended Pub. L. 104–182, title V, §501(f)(6), Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–182 made technical amendment to section catchline and subsec. (a) designation.

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
#### In the Matter of Anita Wilson v. Armand D’Angelo, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York.

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell


Chief Financial Officer





February 2, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.