alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:01 AM

To: 'bradley@cohengardnerlaw.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Tremendous! Entertai nment Inc (FAA-2015-1529)



### July 30, 2015

Dear Mr. Garrett:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is mi ssing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 1529). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, mode ls, and types (i.e., fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions shou ld include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August 13, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### BURNS v. OLD STERLING IRON & MINING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by Milo Burns against the Old Sterling Iron & Mining Company.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless within 20 days the appellant procures the printed papers on appeal to be filed and served as required by the rules of this court, and pays $10 costs of this motion, in which event the motion is denied.
exv10w7






Exhibit 10.7




Notice of Grant of Stock Options

To Non-Employee Director




Time Warner Inc.

ID: 13-4099534

One Time Warner Center

New York, NY 10019-8016




	 	 	 

	I, [NAME], am the participant.

	 	ID: [GLOBAL ID]





Participant has been granted options to buy Time Warner Common Stock (the “Stock Options”) as follows:




        Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Number:

        Date of Grant:

        Purchase Price per Share:

        Total Number of Shares Granted:



Time Warner and I agree that these Stock Options are granted under and governed by the terms and
conditions of the Time Warner Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement, Directors Version 1 (the “Agreement”), all of which are incorporated by
reference into, and made a part of this document.



I understand that so long as I remain a director, employee or consultant of the Company or an
Affiliate, my Stock Options will become vested and exercisable in accordance with the following
vesting schedule, subject to the terms of the Plan and the Agreement:





	 	 	 	100% of the number of Stock Options Granted will vest on the first anniversary of the Date
of Grant.




I understand that vesting of my Stock Options will cease in certain circumstances, including, but
not limited to, certain terminations of my service as a director of the Company, as provided in the
Plan and Agreement.



I understand there is a limited time period to exercise my vested and exercisable Stock Options
following a termination of my service as a director of the Company, and that if vested and
exercisable Stock Options are not exercised within the prescribed time period in the Agreement,
they will be canceled and cannot ever be exercised, as provided in the Plan and Agreement.



I understand that my unvested Stock Options will be canceled upon certain terminations of my
service as a director of the Company and cannot ever be exercised, as provided in the Plan and
Agreement.





	 	 	 	The expiration date of the Stock Options will be
the day
prior to the
10th
anniversary of the Date of Grant, unless the Stock Options are canceled earlier due to a
termination of service as a director, as provided in the Plan and
Agreement.
#### § 221.23 Payment to A.I.D. of excess amounts received by a Noteholder.

If a Noteholder shall, as a result of A.I.D. paying compensation under this Guarantee, receive an excess payment, it shall refund the excess to A.I.D.
**BlowerSize**

10 x 10 10 x 4 10 x 4 (Dual) 10 x 6 10 x 6 (Dual) 10 x 7 10 x 8 10 x 9 10-5/8 x 10-5/8 10-5/8 x 8 11 x 10 11 x 11 11 x 6 11 x 7 11 x 8 11 x 9 11.5 x 10 11.5 x 9 12 x 10 12 x 11 12 x 12 12 x 15 12 x 6 12 x 7 12 x 8 12 x 9 9 x 6 9 x 7 9 x 7.5 9 x 8 9 x 9
Case 3:08-cv-00258-CRB Document 7 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-00258-CRB Document 7 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.709 [Reserved]
#### Tommaso Carrelli, as Administrator, etc., v. Lillie S. Steiner.

Motion for leave to appeal denied, with ten dollars costs, and motion for stay granted. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31324 Summary Calendar

JOSE GUILLOT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDGAR C. DAY, JR., Warden, Washington Correctional Institute; MAG SEALS, Supervisor, Washington Correctional Institute; CAPTAIN SLADE, Supervisor, Washington Correctional Institute; DR. RAMIREZ, Director of Medical for DPSC, Washington

Correctional Institute; KATHLEEN McGINNIS, Director of Nursing for DPSC, Washington
Correctional Institute; LIEUTENANT DIXON, Shift Lieutenant for (b) team for DPSC,

Washington Correctional Institute;

UNIDENTIFIED PARTY; JUDITH PHELPS, Incorrectly named as Judity Phillips,

Defendant-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1818-T)

May 28, 1998

Before JOHNSON, DeMOSS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Guillot, Louisiana inmate # 290502, appeals the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. Guillot

contends that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference2

to his medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to

be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

The district court referred this action to a magistrate judge.

The magistrate judge prepared a report and recommendation,

concluding that Guillot’s complaint should be dismissed with

prejudice. Guillot failed to specifically object to the report and

recommendation. We review for plain error only. See Douglass v.

United Services Auto. Ass’n

, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996).

As a preliminary matter, we note that issues must be briefed

to be preserved for appeal. Yohey v. Collins

, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993). Therefore, Guillot has abandoned any challenge to

the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as frivolous as to

all defendants other than Dr. Ramirez and Lt. Dixon.

Guillot has failed to demonstrate that the district court

plainly erred in dismissing his remaining § 1983 claims. A prison

inmate may only obtain relief under § 1983 on grounds of denial of

medi cal care by proving that prison officials were deliberately

indifferent to his or her serious medical needs. E stelle v.

Gamble

, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). Deliberate indifference

“encompasses only unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain

repugnant to the conscience of mankind.” M cCormick v. Stalder

, 105

F.3d 1059, 1061 (5th Cir. 1997). Guillot contends that Dr. Ramirez

acted with deliberate indifference in changing his work duty status

despite knowing that he complained of a heart condition. However,

Guillot has not shown that the actual condition of his heart3

presented a serious medical condition of which prison officials

were, or even could be, aware. Furthermore, Guillot has not shown

that the decision to change his duty status constituted deliberate

indifference. Therefore, the district court did not err in

dismissing his remaining § 1983 claims.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
DATA FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARES.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (54)
<INVENTORY>                                         48
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,207
<PP&E>                                          11,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,329
<SALES>                                          9,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,839
<CGS>                                            6,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (325)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.52)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40643

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGEL MARTINEZ-VELASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-3-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel MartinezVelasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez-Velasquez has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40643 Document: 00511085965 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
#### In the Matter of Joseph P. White, Petitioner, v Joseph J. Christian, as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determina*594tion of the New York City Housing Authority, which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner from the authority’s police force. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The finding of guilt on two of the charges preferred against petitioner is supported by substantial evidence in the record. In the light of petitioner’s prior employment history with the authority, the penalty of dismissal from the police force is not shocking to one’s sense of fairness. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.
§ 401.18 Supplemental or amended applications and statements. ( a ) If it appears to the Commission that either an application, a statement in response or a statement in reply is not sufficiently definite and complete, the Commission may require a more definite and complete application, statement in response or statement in reply, as the case may be, to be presented.
( b ) Where substantial justice requires it, the Commission with the concurrence of at least four Commissioners may allow the amendment of any application, statement in response, statement in reply and any document or exhibit which has been presented to the Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Charter of the Licensing Support 
Network Advisory Review Panel (LSNARP).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel was 
established by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission as a Federal 
Advisory Committee in 1989. Its purpose was to provide advice on the 
fundamental issues of design and development of an electronic 
information management system to be used to store and retrieve 
documents relating to the licensing of a geologic repository for the 
disposal of high-level radioactive waste, and on the operation and 
maintenance of the system. This electronic information management 
system was known as the Licensing Support System (LSS). In November, 
1998 the Commission approved amendments to 10 CFR Part 2 that renamed 
the Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel as the Licensing 
Support Network Advisory Review Panel.
    Membership on the Panel continues to be drawn from those interests 
that will be affected by the use of the LSN, including the Department 
of Energy, the NRC, the State of Nevada, the National Congress of 
American Indians, affected units of local governments in Nevada, the 
Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force, and a coalition of nuclear industry 
groups. Federal agencies with expertise and experience in electronic 
information management systems may also participate on the Panel.
    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that renewal of 
the charter for the LSNARP until December 9, 2006 is in the public 
interest in connection with duties imposed on the Commission by law. 
This action is being taken in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act after consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew L. Bates, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555: 
Telephone 301-504-1963.

    Dated: December 13, 2004.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27612 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the Approval of the Tribal-State Compact between the State of California and the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 20, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary-Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The compact allows for one gaming facility and authorizes up to 1,500 gaming devices, any banking or percentage card games, and any devices or games authorized under state law to the state lottery. Finally, the term of the compact is until December 31, 2025. The Amendment, also, authorizes annual payments to the State for geographical exclusivity. The Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, is publishing notice that the Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact between the State of California and the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe is now in effect.                 

Dated: December 6, 2004. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 04-27714 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41688

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO ARTURO FLORES-FANG, also known as Arturo, also known 

as Primo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:12-CR-223-3

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fernando Arturo Flores-Fang has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Flores-Fang has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41688 Document: 00514207233 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
No. 16-41688

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41688 Document: 00514207233 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017
#### § 1429.21 Computation of time for filing papers.

In computing any period of time prescribed by or allowed by this subchapter, except in agreement bar situations described in § 1422.3(c) of this subchapter, the day of the act, event, or default from or after which the designated period of time begins to run, shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal holiday: *Provided, however,* In agreement bar situations described in § 1422.3 (c) and (d), if the sixtieth (60th) day prior to the expiration date of an agreement falls on Saturday, Sunday or a Federal legal holiday, a petition, to be timely, must be received by the close of business of the last official workday preceding the sixtieth (60th) day. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is seven (7) days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be excluded from the computations. When this subchapter requires the filing of any paper, such document must be received by the Board or the officer or agent designated to receive such matter before the close of business on the last day of the time limit, if any, for such filing or extension of time that may have been granted.
§ 309.11 Collection. Upon final determination of the existence and amount of a debt, unless other acceptable payment arrangement have been made or procedures under a specific statute apply, Peace Corps shall collect the debt by one or more of the methods described in § 309.9(b) (6) (i-vii) or as otherwise authorized by law and regulation. ( a ) *Administrative offset* — ( 1 ) Payments otherwise due the debtor from the United States shall be offset from the debt in accordance with 31 CFR 901.3. These may be funds under the control of Peace Corps or other Federal agencies. Collection may be through centralized offset by the Financial Management Service (FMS) of the Department of the Treasury.
( 2 ) Such payments include but are not limited to vendor payments, salary, retirement, lump sum payments due upon Federal employment separation, travel reimbursements, tax refunds, loans or other assistance. Offset of Federal salary payments will be in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5514.
( 3 ) Before administrative offset is instituted by another Federal agency or the FMS, Peace Corps shall certify in writing to that entity that the debt is past due and legally enforceable and that Peace Corps has complied with all applicable due process and other requirements as described in this part and other Federal law and regulations.
( b ) Any other method authorized by law or regulation.