alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Test Dates C Line Scrubber 610 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Scrubber 611 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Scrubber

502 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Scrubber

511 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Scrubber 603 (MCEM lb/hr)

November 2011 (Run 1) 0.043 November 2011 (Run 2) 0.041 March 2012 (Run 01) 0.009 March 2012 (Run 2) 0.010 March 2012 (Run 3) 0.008 March 2012 (Run 4) 0.012

**C Line Wet Scrubbers Tests**

Test Dates (Run No.) C Line Wet

Scrubber 5 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 15 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 27 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 6 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 16 (MCEM lb/hr)

Novem ber 2011 (Run 01) 0.136 0.303 0.078 March 2012 (Run 01) 0.047 0.288 0.087 March 2012 (Run 02) 0.034 0.039 March 2012 (Run 03) Sum ma ry

of Intalco POM source testing results **C Line Dry Scrubber Tests**# C line

scrubbers operating on test days Hrs in Month lbs emitted in Month C Line, Al Tons produced in Month Potline lbs pollutant/ton Al produced ( lb/hr) x (# operating scrubs) x (# Hrs in month

) (lbs pollutant emitted in Month) / (Tons Al produced in Month) 44 720 1362.24 7061 0.193 44 720 1298.88 7061 0.184 44 744 294.624 7677 0.038 44 744 327.36 7677 0.043 44 744 261.888 7677 0.034 44 744 392.83 7677 0.051 Average for 6 separate test runs **0.091** Standard Deviation for 6 test runs **0.076**

C Line Wet Scrubber 25 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 36 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet

Scrubber 46 (MCEM lb/hr) C Line Wet Scrubber

57 (MCEM lb/hr) Average for Test

Run

0.172 0.141 0.100 0.058

0.064 0.093 0.092 0.083**Total (Wet and Dry Scrubbers) Potline C - A verage MCEM lb/ton**  **Total Potline C - A**

**verage plus 3 standard deviations MCEM lb/ton**# C line scrubbers

operating on test day Hrs in Nov. lbs emitted in

Month C Line, Al

Tons produced in Month Potline lbs

MCEM/ton Al produced ( lb/hr) x (# operating scrubs) x (# Hrs in month ) (lbs pollutant emitted in Month) / (Tons Al produced in Month) 49 720 6079.92 7061 0.86 49 744 5128.14 7677 0.67 49 744 2102.30 7677 0.27 48 744 2964.10 7677 0.39

**0.55**

**0.27** Average for 4 separate test runs Standard Deviation for 4 test runs**0.64 1.7**  **Total (Wet and Dry Scrubbers) Potline C - A verage MCEM lb/ton**  **Total Potline C - A**

**verage plus 3 standard deviations MCEM lb/ton**
EXHIBIT 32.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Cindy Lea Gimler, Chief Financial Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.       The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six
                  months ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
                  Act of 1934 ; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                             August 14, 2007



                                                   /s/ Cindy Lea Gimler
                                                   -----------------------------
                                            Name:  Cindy Lea Gimler
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 309.3 Definitions. As used in this part (except where the context clearly indicates, or where the term is otherwise defined elsewhere in this part) the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) *Administrative offset* means withholding funds payable by the United States to, or held by the United States for, a person to satisfy a debt owed by the person to the United States.
( b ) *Administrative wage garnishment* means the process by which a Federal agency orders a non-Federal employer to withhold amounts from an employee's wages to satisfy a debt the employee owes to the United States.
( c ) *Compromise* means that the creditor agency accepts less than the full amount of an outstanding debt in full satisfaction of the entire amount of the debt.
( d ) Debt or claim means an amount of money which has been determined by an appropriate agency official to be owed to the United States from any person. As used in this part, the terms debt and claim are synonymous.
( e ) *Debtor* means a person who owes the Federal Government money.
( f ) *Delinquent debt* means any debt, which has not been paid by the date specified in an agency's initial written notification or in an applicable agreement, unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made.
( g ) *Discharge* means the release of a debtor from personal liability for a debt. Further collection action is prohibited.
( h ) *Disposable pay* has the same meaning as that term is defined in 5 CFR § 550.1103.
( i ) *Employee* means a current employee of the Peace Corps or other Federal agency, including a member of the Armed Forces or Reserve of the Armed Forces of the United States.
( j ) *FCCS* means the Federal Claims Collection Standards jointly published by the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Justice at 31 CFR parts 900-904.
( k ) *Person* means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, organization, State or local government, or any other type of entity other than a Federal agency, foreign government, or public international organization.
( l ) *Salary offset* means the withholding of amounts from the current pay account of a Federal employee to satisfy a debt owed by that employee to the United States.
( m ) *Suspension* means the temporary cessation of an active debt collection pending the occurrence of an anticipated event.
( n ) *Termination* means the cessation of all active debt collection action for the foreseeable future.
( o ) *Waiver* means the decision to forgo collection of a debt owed to the United States as permitted or required by law.
#### § 239.10 Payment to USAID of excess amounts received by a Noteholder.

If a Noteholder shall, as a result of USAID paying compensation under the Guarantee, receive an excess payment, it shall refund the excess to USAID.
#### § 305.8 Background investigation.

Section 22 of the Peace Corps Act requires that each Applicant be investigated to ensure that enrollment of the Applicant as a Volunteer is consistent with the national interest. The Peace Corps therefore obtains an appropriate background investigation for all Applicants who are invited to serve in the Peace Corps. Information revealed by the background investigation may be grounds for disqualification from Peace Corps service. Under the Peace Corps Act, if a background investigation regarding an Applicant develops any data reflecting that the Applicant is of questionable loyalty or is a questionable security risk, the Peace Corps must refer the matter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a full field investigation. The results of that full field investigation will be furnished to the Peace Corps for information and appropriate action.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Lucille M. Daniels, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary L. Daniels, Deceased, Appellant. Roger F. Daniels, Respondent.

Memorandum: The evidence clearly establishes that for some time prior to the divorce decree the respondent had neglected and refused to provide for his child during infancy and had abandoned her. The Surrogate found upon ample evidence that such neglect continued until June, 1947. During that month, the respondent paid $7.50 a week for the support of the child for a period of four weeks pursuant to an order of the Monroe County Children’s Court. The compulsory payment of $7.50 for a period of four weeks under order of the Children’s Court did not constitute a resumption of the “ parental relationship and duties ” within the purview of the statute. [Decedent Estate Law, § 87, subd. (e); § 133, subd. 4, par. (e).] He is therefore deprived of a distributive share of the damages in the hands of the administrator. All concur. (The decree settles the accounts of an administratrix.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [193 Misc. 862.]
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 23rd day of May 2005.



                                              /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
### §3003. Congressional declaration of additional objectives

The Congress finds that millions of older citizens in this Nation are suffering unnecessary harm from the lack of adequate services. It is therefore the purpose of this Act, in support of the objectives of the Older Americans Act of 1965 [42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.], to—

(1) make available comprehensive programs which include a full range of health, education, and supportive services to our older citizens who need them,

(2) give full and special consideration to older citizens with special needs in planning such programs, and, pending the availability of such programs for all older citizens, give priority to the elderly with the greatest economic and social need.

(3) provide comprehensive programs which will assure the coordinated delivery of a full range of essential services to our older citizens, and, where applicable, also furnish meaningful employment opportunities for many individuals, including older persons, young persons, and volunteers from the community, and

(4) insure that the planning and operation of such programs will be undertaken as a partnership of older citizens, community agencies, and State and local governments, with appropriate assistance from the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 93–29, title I, §101, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 30; Pub. L. 97–115, §3(d), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1597.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 93–29, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 30, known as the Older Americans Comprehensive Services Amendments of 1973. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1973 Amendment note set out under section 3001 of this title and Tables.

The Older Americans Act of 1965, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–73, July 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 218, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Older Americans Act of 1965 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1981—Par. (1). Pub. L. 97–115 substituted "supportive services" for "social services".
Exhibit 10.1



THE MARKED PORTIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT HAVE BEEN OMITTED

AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO

A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT



April 22, 2004



VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL/FIRST CLASS MAIL



Mr. Myles Cyr

Carnival Corporation

3655 NW 87thAvenue

Miami, FL 33178



Re: Sixth Amendment to Interactive Television System Agreement dated February 20, 2001, by and between Allin Interactive Corporation and Carnival Cruise Lines (hereinafter Sixth Amendment)



Dear Myles:



This letter is to amend the Interactive Television System Agreement (the Agreement) dated February 20, 2001, by and between
Allin Interactive Corporation (Allin) and Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL). Capitalized terms shall have the meaning as set forth in Section 1 of that Agreement.



Whereas, Schedule 1.9 of the Agreement set forth an Installation Schedule for the Agreement; and



Whereas, Schedule 1.11 of the Agreement sets forth Purchase Prices and Payment Schedules
under the Agreement, and



Whereas, the parties desire to amend Schedules 1.9
and 1.11;



Now, therefore, Schedule 1.9 - Installation Schedule is amended as
follows:



Add the Carnival Valor. Date Installed of 11/01/2004 and Date
Operational of 12/01/2004. Newbuild.



Now, therefore, the Schedule 1.11 of the
Agreement is amended as follows:



| | A. | Add: Carnival Valor. Class  Conquest. Cabins  1,487. Price $[REDACTED  CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED].
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Payment Schedule shall remain in accordance with the terms of Schedule 1.11 of the
Agreement.



In witness whereof, this Amendment has been duly executed by the
parties hereto as of the date first above written.



|                              |  |                           
|----------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Allin Interactive Corporation
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /s/    RICHARD W. TALARICO
|                              |  |                           
|Its:                          |  | Chairman & CEO            



|                                                          |  |                 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Carnival Cruise Lines, a division of Carnival Corporation
|                                                          | 
|By:                                                       |  | /s/    MYLES CYR
|                                                          |  |                 
|Its:                                                      |  | VP  CIO
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEN BRIESE,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

WILLIAM JAMES TILLEY,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 08-4233 MEJ

ORDER RE: TRIAL SCHEDULE

On December 10, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to provide their availability for the

purpose of scheduling this matter for a trial. (Dkt. #20.) Three months later, the parties have filed a

response, stating that they are available the week of November 15, 2010. (Dkt. #21.) Unfortunately,

in the three months since the Court issued its order, another trial has been scheduled to take place

that week. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to determine

their availability for a trial in 2010, and thereafter file a joint statement of availability. To avoid

another delayed response, the Court ORDERS the parties to filed their joint statement by April 1,

2010. The following weeks are currently available for a trial in 2010: 

August 30, 2010

September 27, 2010

October 18, 2010

October 25, 2010

November 1, 2010

December 6, 2010

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2010 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04233-MEJ Document 22 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Medicine Bow

17 Saratoga

16

15

Encampment
14

[))) Herd Management Areas 0 10 20 40 60 80 100
Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
Os
Miles

Map 2-21

Wild Horse Herd
Management Areas

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
APPENDIX F: Cecil County VMT and Emission Summary

County VMT Speed

(mph)

HC

(tons/day)

NOX

(tons/day)

Cecil 4,052,387 44.1 2.16 7.23
Cecil County VMT and Emission Summary By Functional Class

Functional Class VMT Speed

(mph)

HC

(tons/day)

NOX

(tons/day)

1) Interstate 1,130,744 65.9 0.53 3.4

2) Principal Arter 183,531 44.7 0.09 0.28

6) Minor Arterial 799,714 49 0.4 1.04

7) Major Collector 190,103 40.4 0.1 0.18

8) Minor Collector 199,910 39.3 0.1 0.19

9) Local 334,069 30.6 0.27 0.35

11) Interstate 324,986 58.7 0.15 1

12) Expressway 41,822 49 0.02 0.04

14) Principal Arter 554,076 32.8 0.31 0.49

16) Minor Arterial 117,363 31.7 0.07 0.11

17) Collector 87,996 28.2 0.05 0.07

19) Local 88,073 25.5 0.07 0.09

Area Total 4,052,387 44.1 2.16 7.23

2
Cecil County VMT and Emission Summary By Vehicle Type

Vehicle Type VMT Speed

(mph)

HC

(tons/day)

NOX

(tons/day)

1) LDGV 1,419,406 0.98 0.69

2) LDGT1 325,988 0.11 0.11

3) LDGT2 1,085,430 0.4 0.54

4) LDGT3 340,388 0.24 0.27

5) LDGT4 156,355 0.12 0.17

6) HDGV2B 158,286 0.08 0.48

7) HDGV3 5,472 0 0.02

8) HDGV4 1,760 0 0.01

9) HDGV5 5,610 0 0.02

10) HDGV6 11,752 0.01 0.04

11) HDGV7 4,895 0 0.02

12) HDGV8A 12 0 0

13) HDGV8B 0 0 0

14) HDGB 1,056 0 0.01

15) LDDV 2,069 0 0

16) LDDT12 45,913 0.01 0.01

17) LDDT34 7,302 0 0.01

18) HDDV2B 48,464 0.01 0.2

19) HDDV3 14,841 0 0.06

20) HDDV4 15,220 0 0.08

21) HDDV5 7,152 0 0.04

22) HDDV6 34,406 0.01 0.25

23) HDDV7 49,874 0.02 0.46

24) HDDV8A 59,531 0.02 0.65

25) HDDV8B 211,531 0.08 2.75

26) HDDBT 7,344 0 0.14

27) HDDBS 13,630 0.01 0.17

28) MC 18,706 0.05 0.03

Area Total 4,052,393 44.1 2.16 7.23

3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

An Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related hasbeen filed, stating that the following cases may be related within the meaning of CivilL.R. 3-12:

C 08-4060 MMC City of Stockton v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.C 10-2115 MEJ Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San 

Francisco v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.C 10-2116 MEJ City of Redwood City v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.C 10-2117 EDL City of Richmond v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.C 10-2119 EMC East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America,

N.A., et al.C 10-2199 DMR City of San Jose v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.

On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to theearliest filed case, I find that the cases:

[    ]  ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).

[ X ]  ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).  Counsel areinstructed that all future filings in the higher-numbered cases are to bear the initialsMMC immediately after the case number.  Any case management conference in thereassigned cases will be rescheduled by the Court.  Any date for hearing a noticedmotion is vacated, and any motion must be re-noticed by the moving party to be heardbefore the undersigned; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; andany deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, exceptdates for any appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned.

DATED:   June 15, 2010                                                         MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04060-MMC   Document 77   Filed 06/15/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T06:57:01-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Harris, Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 519]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about August 11, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
§ 35.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided herein, the ALJ shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, e.g., to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is classified or otherwise privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers or compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 35.24.