alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6190

DOROTHEA CHISOM MARTIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FLUVANNA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-607-7) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorothea Chisom Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dorothea C. Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). When a district court dismisses a habeas petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Claire Miller et al., Appellants, v. Ira Ravner et al., Respondents.

Order entered on June 3, 1959, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10344 Conference Calendar

JOHN H. CLOUD; SORETA CLOUD, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus JIMMY WEBB; UNKNOWN OTHERS; SUPERVISOR UNKNOWN, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:99-CV-207-R

-------------------- October 28, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Cloud, Texas inmate # 749521, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action, in which he also named his wife as a plaintiff, as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Cloud argues that the defendants retaliated against him after he filed a prior civil rights action in which he alleged that the same defendants had deprived him of legal property.No. 02-10344 -2- Cloud fails to establish that but for a retaliatory motive the complained-of incidents would not have occurred. See Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995); Jones v. Greninger , 188 F.3d 322, 324-25 (5th Cir. 1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §3796cc. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796cc was editorially reclassified as section 10361 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Case 3:08-cv-01625-MMC Document 130 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-01625-MMC Document 130 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 3
June 15, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-01625-MMC Document 130 Filed 06/15/10 Page 3 of 3
#### § 23.1 Remittances made payable to the Department of State.

Except as otherwise specified in this title, remittances of moneys shall be drawn payable to the Department of State and sent to the Department for action and deposit. (See §§ 21.2, 22.2, and 51.40 of this chapter.)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4428 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of methyl 

2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2- 

trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]- 

sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4428 IH

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF METHYL 2-[[[[[4- 

2 (DIMETHYLAMINO)-6-(2,2,2- 

3 TRIFLUOROETHOXY)-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

4 YL]AMINO]CARBONYL]AMINO]-SULFONYL]-3- 

5 METHYLBENZOATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.01 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Mixtures of methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2- 

9 trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]- 

10 sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

11 31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

14 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

15 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,953
<SECURITIES>                                    14,918
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                       743
<INVENTORY>                                        399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,777
<PP&E>                                           5,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,515
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,278
<CGS>                                              240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,594)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (192)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
**
Exhibit 34.2 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S.Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities****Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, exceptfor****servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred eitherprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota 

May 26, 2022 

 

 
19 

**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: February 4, 2004. 

Elizabeth S. Woodruff, 

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 04-2784 Filed 2-5-04; 10:51 am] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### Wilbur M. Howe, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### §3797s–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797s–5 was editorially reclassified as section 10595a of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Life USA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Tsang Ping Lam,
President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Wesley F. Whiting
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Wesley F. Whiting, President
Date: May 14, 2008
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R IGOB ER TO M ENDOZA-PALAC IOS, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-72952 Age n c y No. A200-630-205 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. R igobe rto M e ndoz a -Pa la c ios, a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ations for c a

n c e l lation of re m ova l a nd volunta

ry de p arture . Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. 

# FIL ED AUG 04 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).W e re vie wfor substa ntia l e vide nc e de te rm i nations re ga rding good mora l c ha

ra c te r. Ramos v . IN

S , 246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th C ir. 2001). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm ination tha t M e ndoz a Pa la c ios is sta

tutorily ba rre d from e sta blishing the

good m ora l c ha

ra c te r ne c e ssa

ry to qua lify for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l, whe re he gave fa lse te stim ony unde r oath in im m igration c ourt with the

subje c tive inte nt to obtai n a n im m igration be n e fit. Se e 8 U.S.C . §§ 1101(f)(6), 1229b(b)(1)(B ); Ramos , 246 F.3d a t 1266. W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r M e ndoz a -Pa la c ios’ s une xha uste d c onte ntion that he tim e ly re c ante d his fa lse te stim ony . Id. at 1266-67 (“ Fa ilure to ra ise an argum e nt be fore the B IA de prive s this c ourt of jurisdic tion.” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 3 - 7 2 9 5 2 2
### §300z–8. Evaluation and administration

(a) Of the funds appropriated under this subchapter, the Secretary shall reserve not less than 1 per centum and not more than 3 per centum for the evaluation of activities carried out under this subchapter. The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of the Congress a summary of each evaluation conducted under this section.

(b) The officer or employee of the Department of Health and Human Services designated by the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter shall report directly to the Assistant Secretary for Health with respect to the activities of such officer or employee in carrying out such provisions.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XX, §2009, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §955(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 591.)
#### § 239.11 Subrogation of USAID.

In the event of payment by USAID to a Noteholder under the Guarantee, USAID shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of such Noteholder against the Borrower under the related Note.
§ 239.5 Non-impairment of the Guarantee. After issuance of the Guarantee, the Guarantee will be an unconditional, full faith and credit obligation of the United States of America and will not be affected or impaired by any subsequent condition or event. This non-impairment of the guarantee provision shall not, however, be operative with respect to any loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which the claiming Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became a Noteholder. In particular and without limitation, the Guarantee shall not be affected or impaired by: ( a ) Any defect in the authorization, execution, delivery or enforceability of any agreement or other document executed by a Noteholder, USAID, the Fiscal Agent or the Borrower in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Guarantee or
( b ) The suspension or termination of the program pursuant to which USAID is authorized to guarantee the Eligible Notes.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting Cancellations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Red Lessons Learned meeting scheduled for December 16-17, 2004, will not be held.

Dated: December 15, 2004.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-27755 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

December 14,2010

Mr. David McDonald VP Operations Aeronautical Engineers, Inc. 7765 NW 54tll St. Miami, FL, 33166
DearMr. McDonald: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

We have received your November 10,2010, petition for exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulatioo\; (14 CFR) 25.785(d), 25.812(e), 25.855(a), 25.857(e), 25.1447(c)(I), and 25.1449, forthe McDonnell Douglas Model MD-80 and MD-90 series passenger airplanes converted to freikhter airplanes. The exemption, ifgranted, would allow carriage of six non-crewmembers (a.k.a. supernumeraries) in an areajust aftof, and outside, the flight deck on these freighter ai~Ianes. Your petition has been added topublic docket no. FAA-20lO-lIS} and is being processed. We will contact you ifwe need additional information. We will advise you ofour final deciJion on your petition as soon as possible. Ifyou have any questions orconcerns regarding ~ourpetition orthe petition process, please contact Alan Sinclair at (425) 227-2195, e-mail alan.sinclair@faa.gov.

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)

Maximum Per Diem Rates for Colorado, Florida and Texas

AGENCY:  Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION:  Notice of Per Diem Bulletin 05-3, revised continental United 
States (CONUS) per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) has reviewed the 
lodging rates of certain locations in the States of Colorado, Florida 
and Texas and determined that they are inadequate. The per diems 
prescribed in Bulletin 05-3 may be found at http://www.gsa.gov/perdiem.

DATES:  This notice is effective December 17, 2004 and applies to 
travel performed on or after December 27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For clarification of content, contact 
Lois Mandell, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Travel Management 
Policy, at (202) 501-2824. Please cite FTR Per Diem Bulletin 05-3.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    After an analysis of the per diem rates established for FY 2005 
(see the Federal Register notices at 69 FR 53071, August 31, 2004, and 
69 FR 60152, October 7, 2004), the per diem rate is being changed in 
the following locations:

State of Colorado

     City of Aurora

State of Florida

     Brevard County

State of Texas

     Dallas County

B. Procedures

    Per diem rates are published on the Internet at www.gsa.gov/perdiem 
as an FTR Per Diem Bulletin and published in the Federal Register on a 
periodic basis. This process ensures timely increases or decreases in 
per diem rates established by GSA for Federal employees on official 
travel within CONUS. Notices published periodically in the Federal 
Register, such as this one, now constitute the only notification of 
revisions in CONUS per diem rates to agencies.

    Dated: Decenber 13, 2004.
Thomas J. Horan,
Deputy to the Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Transportation 
and Personal Property.
[FR Doc. 04-27605 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-S
```