alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TSEGAI HAILE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et

al.,

Defendants

 /

No. 08-4149 MMC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR COURT’S ASSISTANCE

TO FIND ATTORNEY

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff’s “Request for Court’s Assistance to Find an Atty

for Representation on His Cause,” filed March 10, 2010. Having read and considered the

request, and having reviewed the docket of the instant matter, the Court rules as follows.

Because plaintiff will not be subjected to any possible loss of physical liberty if he

does not prevail in the instant action, he has no right to appointment of counsel, see

Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981), nor are funds available from

the district court to compensate appointed counsel. In employment actions brought under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, however, pro bono counsel may

be appointed “[u]pon application by the complainant and in such circumstances as the

court may deem just.” See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1). In considering an application for

appointment of counsel under § 2000e-5(f)(1), the district court assesses three factors:

Case 3:08-cv-04149-MMC Document 178 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

“(1) the plaintiff's financial resources, (2) the efforts made by the plaintiff to secure counsel,

and (3) whether the plaintiff's claim has merit.” See Bradshaw v. Zoological Soc. of San

Diego, 662 F. 2d 1301, 1318 (9th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff has failed to make a sufficient showing with respect to any of the abovereferenced factors. Plaintiff has not shown he lacks the financial resources to hire an

attorney. Further, plaintiff has not shown he has made any effort to secure new counsel

following his decision to terminate his relationship with the attorney who previously

represented him herein. Finally, a jury has determined that plaintiff’s claims lack merit. In

sum, plaintiff has not made a sufficient showing to justify a search for volunteer counsel

willing to accept an appointment.

Accordingly, plaintiff's request is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04149-MMC Document 178 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2
Panel Member Roster for the May 11 , 2016

Meeting of the Chemical Safety Advisory Committee ( CSAC )

Orientation Session on Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

Docket Number: EPA

- HQ

- OPP T

- 201 5

- 0 234

CSAC Chair

Kenneth Portier , Ph.D.

Program Director, Statistics

American Cancer Society

National Home Office

Atlanta, GA

Designated Federal Official

Scott Lynn , Ph.D.

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Science Coordination & Policy

WJC East Building, MC 7201M

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Was hington, DC 20460

Phone (202) 564

- 2631

lynn.scott @epa.gov

CSAC Panel Members

Holly Davies , Ph.D.

Senior Toxicologist

Washington State Department of Ecology

Olympia, WA

William Doucette , Ph.D.

Professor

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Utah State University

Logan, UT

Panos G. Georgopoulos, Ph.D., M.S., Dipl. Ing.

Professor

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health

Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences School of Public Health

Rutgers The State University

Piscatawa y, NJ

Kathleen M. Gilbert , Ph.D.

Professor

Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, AR

John C. Kissel , Ph.D.

Professor

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

School of Pub lic Health

University of Washington

Seattle, WA

Jaymie R. Meliker , Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Program in Public Health

Department of Preventative Medicine

Stony Brook University

Port Jefferson, NY

Daniel Schlenk , Ph.D.

Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology and Environmental Toxicology

Department of Environmental Scien c es

University of California Riverside

Riverside, CA

Kristina Thayer , Ph.D.

Director

Office of Health Assessment and Translation

NTP Deputy Director for Analysis

National Institu te of Environmental Health Sciences

Research Triangle Park, NC
### §293j. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §102(2), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3537

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §746, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, §102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2034; amended Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §313(a)(2), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3507; Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2008(i)(3), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 213, related to area health education center programs.

A prior section 746 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 294q–2 of this title prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–408.
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page1 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 2 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page2 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 3 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page3 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 4 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page4 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 5 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page5 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 6 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page6 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 7 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page7 of 9
Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page8 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

April 21, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 191 Filed 04/21/10 Page 9 of 9 Case3:08-cv-04238-CRB Document190-2 Filed04/20/10 Page9 of 9
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- MARS Construction Company aka MARS

Construction and Engineering Service Co. Under Contract No. W91B4N-16-C-8015 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ASBCA Nos. 61289, 61372 ) ) ) Walt Pennington, Esq. Pennington Law Firm San Diego, CA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Bruce H. Robinson, JA

Trial Attorney ORDEROF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: February 12,2019

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61289, 61372, Appeals ofMARS Construction Company aka MARS Construction and Engineering Service Co., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### §300s. General regulations

The Secretary shall by regulation—

(1) prescribe the manner in which he shall determine the priority among projects for which assistance is available under part A or B, based on the relative need of different areas for such projects and giving special consideration—

(A) to projects for medical facilities serving areas with relatively small financial resources and for medical facilities serving rural communities,

(B) in the case of projects for modernization of medical facilities, to projects for facilities serving densely populated areas,

(C) in the case of projects for construction of outpatient medical facilities, to projects that will be located in, and provide services for residents of, areas determined by the Secretary to be rural or urban poverty areas,

(D) to projects designed to (i) eliminate or prevent imminent safety hazards as defined by Federal, State, or local fire, building, or life safety codes or regulations, or (ii) avoid noncompliance with State or voluntary licensure or accreditation standards, and

(E) to projects for medical facilities which, alone or in conjunction with other facilities, will provide comprehensive health care, including outpatient and preventive care as well as hospitalization;

(2) prescribe for medical facilities projects assisted under part A or B general standards of construction, modernization, and equipment, which standards may vary on the basis of the class of facilities and their location; and

(3) prescribe the general manner in which each entity which receives financial assistance under part A or B or has received financial assistance under part A or B or subchapter IV shall be required to comply with the assurances required to be made at the time such assistance was received and the means by which such entity shall be required to demonstrate compliance with such assurances.

An entity subject to the requirements prescribed pursuant to paragraph (3) respecting compliance with assurances made in connection with receipt of financial assistance shall submit periodically to the Secretary data and information which reasonably supports the entity's compliance with such assurances. The Secretary may not waive the requirement of the preceding sentence.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVI, §1620, as added Pub. L. 96–79, title II, §202(b), Oct. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 632.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300s, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVI, §1630, as added Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–641, §4, 88 Stat. 2269, provided for judicial review by the United States Court of Appeals, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–79, §202(b), eff. Oct. 1, 1979.

A prior section 1620 of act July 1, 1944, was renumbered section 1601 by Pub. L. 96–79, title II, §203(a)(1), Oct. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 635, and is classified to section 300q of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 204 of Pub. L. 96–79, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 300q of this title.
#### § 274.11b Form N-3, registration statement of separate accounts organized as management investment companies.

Form N-3 shall be used as the registration statement to be filed pursuant to section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 by separate accounts that offer variable annuity contracts to register as management investment companies. This form shall also be used for registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of the securities of such separate accounts (§ 239.17a of this chapter).

[50 FR 26161, June 25, 1985]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form N-3, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Louis S. Beck, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Janus Hotels and
Resorts, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 14, 2003
      ------------------------

/s/ Louis S. Beck
----------------------------------------------

Louis S. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ronald
      R. Helm, Chief Executive Officer, and John P. Jensen, Vice President of Finance
      and Controller, of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November
      13, 2008




/s/
                Ronald R. HelmRonald
                R. Helm,Chief
                Executive Officer/s/
                John P. JensenJohn
                P. JensenVice
                President of Finance and Controller
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael L. Hartzmark, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:     November 15, 2004                      /s/ Michael L. Hartzmark
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael L. Hartzmark
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 7/29/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A.

MOBILE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING

SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI;

PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S.

BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN

CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA;

ANIMESH NASKAR,

Defendants.

No. C-08-02658 RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

ORDER PERMITTING ALTERNATIVE

SERVICE OF PROCESS

[Re Docket No. 151]

Plaintiffs move for an order either permitting alternative service of process or deeming

service of all defendants to have been completed. The court submits this matter on the papers. 

Appearance is not necessary. The motion is denied without prejudice. An order will be posted

separately.

DATED: 7/29/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 181 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 209

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 209 appear at 68 FR 51361, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 209.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2536 

To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-HEXYLRESORCINOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 4-Hexylresorcinol) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §3781. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2091

Section, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §801, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1201, related to establishment of Office of Justice Assistance, Research, and Statistics.

A prior section 3781, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §601, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 209; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085; Pub. L. 91–644, title I, §§6(b), 9, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1887, 1888; Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 216; Pub. L. 94–503, title I, §129, Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2424, defined the terms used in this subchapter, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157. See section 10251 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 12, 1984, see section 609AA(a) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10101 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

The Court would like to have a short telephone conference with counsel at 9:00 A.M. ON

MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2010. Plaintiff’s counsel are requested to set up the telephone call and then

contact the Court at 415-522-3684 when all parties are present. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02984-WHA Document 31 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1
#### BARRINGER v. UNITED TRACTION CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by Charles E. Barringer against the United Traction Company. No opinion. Motion denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2478 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.87.14 Baby carriers, chain adjustors, chain covers, mechanical grips with 7/8′′ internal 

diameter, air horns, wideangle reflectors, plastic saddle covers, safety pads, chain 

tensioners, toe clips, head 

sets, seat posts, all the foregoing for chief use on bicycles (provided for in subheading 8714.99.80) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2478 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ