alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4542. Congressional declaration for utilization of programs under other Federal laws in fields of health and social services

The Congress declares that, in addition to the programs under the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 [42 U.S.C. 4541 et seq.], programs under other Federal laws which provide Federal or federally assisted research, prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation in the fields of health and social services should be appropriately utilized to help eradicate alcohol abuse and alcoholism as a major problem.

(Pub. L. 93–282, title I, §102(b), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 126.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–616, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1848, which is classified principally to this chapter (§4541 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4541 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,225,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,729,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,498,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,535,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,821,960
<PP&E>                                      14,000,268
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,351,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,741,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,799,599
<BONDS>                                     39,781,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,120
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,594,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,741,992
<SALES>                                     16,832,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,952,192
<CGS>                                       15,878,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,324,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,484,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             662,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,898,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                   712,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,186,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (397,190)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   789,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, Douglas S. Kearney, the Chief Financial Officer of Lason, Inc. (the“registrant”) certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-e) for the registrant and we have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls, and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and;  (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (orpersons fulfilling the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        August 10, 2004  /s/ Douglas S. Kearney    Douglas S. Kearney    Chief Financial Officer
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AdministrationAdministrator GuidesAdministratorsBoard Administrator RelationshipDecision MakingGovernanceGoverning BoardsParticipative Decision MakingPreschool EducationTraining

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 0907

- 18T3

ROBERT J. TRIFFIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GREGG GEORGE RALSTON,

Defendant

- Respondent,

and

DAVID KLINGER,

Defendant.

____________________________

Argued November 13, 2019

– Decided

Before Judges Fisher and Accurso.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Camden County, Docket No. DC

- 00 4943

- 18.

Robert J. Triffin, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Respondent has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

December 9, 20192 A

- 0907

- 18T3

Appellant having filed a request to withdraw his appeal with prejudice and

without costs to any party, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Egburt E. Woodbury and Others, Together Constituting the State Board of Tax Commissioners, and the City of New York, Intervener, Respondents. (Taxes of 1909, 1910, 1911.)

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
#### § 240.9 No acceleration of Eligible Notes.

Eligible Notes shall not be subject to acceleration, in whole or in part, by USAID, the Noteholder or any other party. USAID shall not have the right to pay any amounts in respect of the Eligible Notes other than in accordance with the original payment terms of such Eligible Notes.
#### § 33.12 Penalties.

Persons who willfully make any false or misleading statement or representation to obtain compensation from the Fund are subject to criminal prosecution under 22 U.S.C. 1980(g). This provides penalties up to $25,000 or imprisonment for up to one year, or both. Any evidence of criminal conduct will be promptly forwarded to the United States Department of Justice for action. Additionally, misrepresentation, concealment, or fraud, or acts intentionally designed to result in seizure, may void the guaranty agreement.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Espinal, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 906]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 17, 1997, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

“ ‘[W]here the plea allocution demonstrates a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of the right to appeal, intended comprehensively to cover all aspects of the case, and no constitutional or statutory mandate or public policy concern prohibits its acceptance, the waiver will be upheld completely’ ” *(People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833; *see, People v Muniz,*91 NY2d 570, 575). Here, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement encompassed the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment based on an unreasonable delay in sentencing *(see, People v Jones,*255 AD2d 456).

In light of our determination, we do not reach the defendant’s remaining contention. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
§ 401.11 Availability of records. ( a ) The following items in the official records of the Commission shall be available for public information at the permanent offices of the Commission. Applications. References. Public Notices. Press Releases. Statements in Response. Statements in Reply. Records of hearings, including exhibits filed. Brief and formal Statements submitted at hearings or at other times.
( b ) Decisions rendered and orders issued by the Commission and formal opinions of any of the Commissioners with relation thereto, shall be available similarly for public information after duplicate originals of the decisions or orders have been transmitted to and filed with the Governments pursuant to Article XI of the Treaty.
( c ) Copies of reports submitted to one or both of the Governments pursuant to the Treaty shall be available similarly for public information only with the consent of the Government or Governments to whom the reports are addressed.
( d ) Reports, letters, memoranda and other communications addressed to the Commissions, by boards or committees created by or at the request of the Commission, are privileged and shall become available for public information only in accordance with a decision of the Commission to that effect.
( e ) Except as provided in the preceding paragraphs of this section, records of deliberations, and documents, letters, memoranda and communications of every nature and kind in the official records of the Commission, whether addressed to or by the Commission, commissioners, secretaries, advisers or any of them, are privileged and shall become available for public information only in accordance with a decision of the Commission to that effect.
( f ) A copy of any document, report, record or other paper which under this section is available for public information may be furnished to any person upon payment of any cost involved in its reproduction.
#### Veronica Grebe, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Union Free School District No. 2, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, malicious prosecution and libel, plaintiff Veronica Grebe appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 17, 1977, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determina*593tion denying her motion, *inter alia,*to vacate an order of preclusion and to permit service of a bill of particulars. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and appellant’s motion granted. Appellant’s time to serve the bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The examination before trial shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by appellant or at such time and place as the parties may agree. The said notice must be served within 10 days after service of the bill of particulars. Under the circumstances, the order of preclusion should be vacated (see *Batista v St. Luke’s Hosp.,*46 AD2d 806). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 138.205 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 138.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
        August 11, 2008


*/s/
                George P. Morris*George
                P. MorrisChief
                Financial Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Robert E. Schwach.

Motion granted, judgment "of conviction unanimously reversed and new' trial granted. Memorandum: Because of the death of the court reporter the appellant is unable to procure and present to us a transcript of the testimony. Therefore an adequate and proper record on appeal cannot be prepared and filed. The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

M.D. MODZELEWSKI, R.Q. WARD, J.P. LISIECKI

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MARCUS M. EALEY

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201300415

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 26 July 2013.

Military Judge: Col Howard Russell, USMCR.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Marine Aircraft 

Group 11, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing, Marine Corps Air Station 

Miramar, San Diego, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol K.C. Harris, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

31 January 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lance Thibault, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arcellx, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

----

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: 	March 24, 2022

 

/s/ Lance Thibault			

Lance Thibault

Interim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.301 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 217

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 217.15-217.20 [Reserved]