PERMIT TO OPERATE

Under the authority of RSMo 643 and the Federal Clean Air Act the applicant is authorized to

operate the air contaminant source(s) described below, in accordance with the laws, rules, and

conditions set forth here in.

Operating Permit Number: OP2001029

Expiration Date: April 19, 2006

Project Number: 031-0021-023

Installation Name and Address

Lone Star Industries, Inc.

2524 S. Sprigg Street

Cape Girardeau, MO 63701

Cape Girardeau County

Parent Company's Name and Address

Lone Star Industries, Inc.

300 First Stamford Place

Stamford, CT 06912

Installation Description:

Lone Star Industries, Inc. manufactures portland cement in Cape Girardeau County.

The installation is located in an attainment area. The installation is an existing

major source of particulate matter, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide

and hazardous air pollutants.

April 19, 2001

Effective Date Director or Designee

Department of Natural Resources
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 2

Project No. 031-0021-023

Table of Contents

I. INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION AND EQUIPMENT LISTING...................................................8

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................8

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................8

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS ..........................................................................11

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.................................................................12

II. PLANT WIDE EMISSION LIMITATIONS .......................................................................13

Permit Condition PW001......................................................................................................13

10 CSR 10-6.170........................................................................................................................................... 13

Permit Condition PW002......................................................................................................14

10 CSR 10-6.080........................................................................................................................................... 14

40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M............................................................................................................................ 14

Permit Condition PW003......................................................................................................14

10 CSR 10-6.250........................................................................................................................................... 14

Permit Condition PW004......................................................................................................15

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 15

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 15

Permit Condition PW005......................................................................................................16

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 16

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 16

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 16

Permit Condition PW006......................................................................................................18

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 18

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 18

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 18

Permit Condition PW007......................................................................................................19

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 19

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 19

Permit Condition PW008......................................................................................................21

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 21

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 21

Permit Condition PW009......................................................................................................22

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 22

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 22

Permit Condition PW010......................................................................................................24

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 24

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 24

Permit Condition PW011......................................................................................................26

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 26

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 26

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 26

Permit Condition PW012......................................................................................................30

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 30

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 30

Permit Condition PW013......................................................................................................31

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 31

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 31

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 31

Permit Condition PW014......................................................................................................34

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 34

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 34

Permit Condition PW015......................................................................................................35

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 35

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 35

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 35

Permit Condition PW016......................................................................................................36
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 3

Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 36

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 36

Permit Condition PW017......................................................................................................38

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 38

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 38

Permit Condition PW018......................................................................................................42

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 42

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 42

Permit Condition PW019......................................................................................................43

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 43

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 43

Permit Condition PW020......................................................................................................45

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 45

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 45

Permit Condition PW021......................................................................................................53

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 53

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 53

Permit Condition PW022......................................................................................................59

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 59

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 59

Permit Condition PW023......................................................................................................62

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 62

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 62

Permit Condition PW024......................................................................................................65

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 65

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE ....................................................................................................................... 65

Permit Condition PW025......................................................................................................66

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 66

III. EMISSION UNIT SPECIFIC EMISSION LIMITATIONS.......................................................68

EU0010 through EU0040 ....................................................................................................68

Permit Conditions EU0010-001 through EU0040-001 .........................................................68

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 68

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO ...................................................................................................................... 68

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 68

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 68

EU0050 ...............................................................................................................................69

Permit Condition EU0050-001 .............................................................................................70

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 70

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO ...................................................................................................................... 70

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 70

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 70

EU0060 through EU0240 ....................................................................................................72

Permit Conditions EU0060-001 through EU0240-001 .........................................................73

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 73

Permit Conditions EU0150-002 through EU0220-002 .........................................................74

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 74

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 74

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 74

Permit Conditions EU0150-003 through EU0220-003; ........................................................75

EU0230-002 and EU0240-002.............................................................................................75

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 75

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 75

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 75

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 75

EU0250 through EU0290 ....................................................................................................77

Permit Conditions EU0250-001 through EU0340-001 .........................................................79

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 79

Permit Conditions EU0250-002 through EU0340-002 .........................................................79
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 4

Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.070.......................................................................................................................................... 79

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y............................................................................................................................ 79

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 79

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 79

Permit Conditions EU0250-003 through EU0270-003; ........................................................81

and EU0290-003 through EU0340-003 ...............................................................................81

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 81

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 81

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 81

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 81

EU0350 through EU0360 ....................................................................................................84

Permit Conditions EU0350-001 and EU0360-001................................................................84

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 84

Permit Conditions EU0350-002 through EU0360-002 .........................................................85

10 CSR 10-6.070.......................................................................................................................................... 85

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y............................................................................................................................ 85

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 85

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 85

Permit Conditions EU0350-003 and EU0360-003................................................................86

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 86

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 86

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 86

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 86

EU0370 through EU0380 ....................................................................................................88

Permit Conditions EU0370-001 and EU0380-001................................................................88

10 CSR 10-6.260........................................................................................................................................... 88

EU0390 and EU0400...........................................................................................................89

Permit Conditions EU0390-001 and EU0490-001................................................................90

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 90

Permit Conditions EU0390-002 and EU0490-002................................................................91

10 CSR 10-6.075........................................................................................................................................... 91

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 91

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 91

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 91

Permit Conditions EU0470-003 through EU0490-003 .........................................................93

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 93

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 93

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 93

EU0500 through EU0510 ....................................................................................................94

Permit Conditions EU0500-001 ...........................................................................................94

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 94

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 94

10 CSR 10-6.060........................................................................................................................................... 94

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 94

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 94

Permit Condition EU0510-001 .............................................................................................96

10 CSR 10-3.050........................................................................................................................................... 96

10 CSR 10-6.070........................................................................................................................................... 96

10 CSR 10-6.060........................................................................................................................................... 96

10 CSR 10-3.080........................................................................................................................................... 96

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 96

Permit Condition EU0500-002 .............................................................................................98

10 CSR 10-6.260........................................................................................................................................... 98

10 CSR 10-6.060........................................................................................................................................... 98

Permit Condition EU0500-003 .............................................................................................99

10 CSR 10-6.060........................................................................................................................................... 99

Permit Condition EU0500-004 ...........................................................................................101

10 CSR 10-6.080......................................................................................................................................... 101

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF........................................................................................................................ 101

Permit Condition EU0500-005 and EU0510-002 ...............................................................106
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 5

Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 106

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 106

Permit Condition EU0500-006 and EU0510-003 ...............................................................109

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 109

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 109

Permit Condition EU0500-007 and EU0510-004 ...............................................................110

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 110

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 110

Permit Condition EU0500-008 ...........................................................................................115

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 115

Permit Condition EU0500-009 ...........................................................................................120

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 120

Permit Condition EU0500-010 ...........................................................................................124

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 124

Permit Condition EU0500-011 ...........................................................................................129

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 129

Permit Condition EU0500-012 ...........................................................................................133

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 133

Permit Condition EU0500-013 ...........................................................................................137

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 137

Permit Condition EU0500-014 ...........................................................................................141

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 141

Permit Condition EU0500-015 ...........................................................................................147

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 147

Permit Condition EU0500-016 ...........................................................................................149

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 149

Permit Condition EU0500-017 ...........................................................................................153

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 153

EU0520 and EU0530.........................................................................................................156

Permit Conditions EU0520-001 and EU0530-001..............................................................156

10 CSR 10-6.260......................................................................................................................................... 156

Permit Conditions EU0520-002 and EU0530-002..............................................................157

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 157

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 157

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 157

EU0540 through EU0810 ..................................................................................................158

Permit Conditions EU0540-001 through EU0570-001 .......................................................162

EU0600-001 through EU0610-001 ....................................................................................162

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 162

Permit Conditions EU0580-001 through EU0590-001 .......................................................163

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 163

10 CSR 10-6.060......................................................................................................................................... 163

Permit Conditions EU0620-001 through EU0700-001 .......................................................164

EU0730-001 through EU0810-001 ....................................................................................164

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 164

Permit Conditions EU0540-002 through EU0610-002 .......................................................165

EU0650-002 through EU0660-002 ....................................................................................165

EU0700-002 ......................................................................................................................165

EU0710-001 through EU0720-001 ....................................................................................165

EU0730-002 through EU0810-002 ....................................................................................165

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 165

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 165

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 165

Permit Conditions EU0540-003 through EU0610-003 .......................................................166

EU0620-002 through EU0640-002 ....................................................................................166

EU0650-003 through EU0660-003 ....................................................................................166

EU0670-002 through EU0690-002 ....................................................................................166
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 6

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0730-003 through EU0810-003 ....................................................................................166

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 166

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 166

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 166

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 166

EU0820 through EU1030 ..................................................................................................168

Permit Conditions EU0820-001 through EU0940-001 .......................................................171

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 171

10 CSR 10-6.060......................................................................................................................................... 171

Permit Condition EU0950-001 through EU1030-001.........................................................172

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 172

Permit Conditions EU0820-002 through EU0940-002 .......................................................172

EU0960-002 through EU0990-002 ....................................................................................172

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 172

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 172

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 172

Permit Conditions EU0820-003 through EU0940-003 .......................................................174

EU0950-002 ......................................................................................................................174

EU0960-003 through EU0990-003 ....................................................................................174

EU1000-002 through EU1030-002 ....................................................................................174

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 174

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 174

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 174

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 174

EU1040 through EU1520 ..................................................................................................176

Permit Condition EU1040-001 through EU1070 and .........................................................180

EU1380-001 through EU1500-001 ....................................................................................180

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 180

Permit Condition EU1080-001 through EU1370-001.........................................................181

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 181

Permit Conditions EU1510-001 and EU1520-001..............................................................181

10 CSR 10-3.050......................................................................................................................................... 181

Permit Conditions EU1040-002 through EU1070-002 .......................................................183

EU1410-002 through EU1450-002 ....................................................................................183

EU1510-002 through EU1520-002 ....................................................................................183

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 183

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 183

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 183

Permit Conditions EU1080-002 through EU1400-002 .......................................................184

EU1410-003 through EU1450-003 ....................................................................................184

EU1460-002 through EU1500-002 ....................................................................................184

EU1510-003 through EU1520-003 ....................................................................................184

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 184

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 184

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 184

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 184

Permit Conditions EU1040-003 through EU1070-003 .......................................................186

10 CSR 10-6.075......................................................................................................................................... 186

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 186

10 CSR 10-3.080......................................................................................................................................... 186

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 186

EU1530 through EU1600 ..................................................................................................187

Permit Conditions EU1530-001 through EU1580-001 .......................................................189

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 189

Permit Conditions EU1530-002 through EU1580-002 .......................................................190

EU1590-001 and EU1600-001...........................................................................................190

10 CSR 10-6.080......................................................................................................................................... 190

EU1610 .............................................................................................................................195
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 7

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU1610-001 ...........................................................................................195

10 CSR 10-6.060......................................................................................................................................... 195

EU1620 through EU1630 ..................................................................................................196

Permit Conditions EU1620-001 and EU1630-001..............................................................196

10 CSR 10-6.260......................................................................................................................................... 196

IV. CORE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................197

V. GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................200

PERMIT DURATION ................................................................................................................200

GENERAL RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................200

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANS UNDER SECTION 112(R) ..................................................................201

SEVERABILITY CLAUSE ..........................................................................................................201

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS......................................................................................................201

INCENTIVE PROGRAMS NOT REQUIRING PERMIT REVISIONS ........................................................202

REASONABLY ANTICIPATED OPERATING SCENARIOS...................................................................202

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................202

PERMIT SHIELD ....................................................................................................................203

EMERGENCY PROVISIONS.......................................................................................................204

OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY .....................................................................................................205

OFF-PERMIT CHANGES..........................................................................................................205

RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL .........................................................................................................206

STATEMENT OF BASIS............................................................................................................206

Attachment A.............................................................................................................................................. 207

Attachment B.............................................................................................................................................. 208

Attachment C.............................................................................................................................................. 209

Attachment D.............................................................................................................................................. 210

Attachment E.............................................................................................................................................. 211

Attachment F .............................................................................................................................................. 212

Attachment G.............................................................................................................................................. 213

Attachment H.............................................................................................................................................. 214

Attachment I ............................................................................................................................................... 215

Attachment J .............................................................................................................................................. 216
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 8

Project No. 031-0021-023

I. Installation Description and Equipment Listing

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Lone Star Industries, Inc. manufactures portland cement in Cape Girardeau County. The

installation is located in an attainment area. The installation is an existing major source of

particulate matter (PM), sulfur oxides (SOX), nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO) and

Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs).

The installation contains quarry operations, raw material handling and storage, raw material

grinding, kiln pyroprocessing, cement kiln dust handling, coke handling, clinker cooler, handling

and storage, finish mill systems, and cement storage and loadout.

The installation is subject to the Portland Cement Manufacturing MACT and the Hazardous Waste

Combustor MACT. The installation operates a long-dry process kiln, which contains an alkali

bypass and an in-line raw mill. Since the installation is a major source of HAPs, the kiln, raw mill,

finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system and bulk

loading/unloading systems are covered by the Portland Cement Manufacturing MACT

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS

The following list provides a description of the equipment at this installation which emit air

pollutants and which are identified as having unit-specific emission limitations.

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit 

EU0010 Screen (A-2101)

EU0020 Screen (A-2201)

EU0030 Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801)

EU0040 Transfer Belt (A-3802)

EU0050 Secondary Crusher (A-3800)

EU0060 Hopper (W-4600)

EU0070 Mannermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary

EU0080 Transfer Belt (W-4900)

EU0090 Transfer Belt (W-5000)

EU0100 Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0110 Hopper (W-5301)

EU0120 Transfer Belt (W-5700)

EU0130 Transfer Belt (W-3800)

EU0140 Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000)

EU0150 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone)

EU0160 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)

EU0170 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli)

EU0180 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale)

EU0190 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum)

EU0200 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone)

EU0210 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash)

EU0220 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash)

EU0230 Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202)

EU0240 Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0250 Hopper W-7100

EU0260 Feeder Belt W-9800

EU0270 Transfer Belt W-9700

EU0280 Screen W-9701

EU0290 Transfer Belt W-7900
Lone Star Industries, Inc.

9

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0300 Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106

EU0310 Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal)

EU0320 Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)

EU0330 Transfer Belt C-1000

EU0340 Transfer Belt C-2400

EU0350 RSP Mill SystemC-2500

EU0360 Kiln Mill SystemC-1100

EU0370 Process Heater C-1400

EU0380 Process Heater C-2800

EU0390 Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0400 Truck Loading

EU0410 Hopper Loading KB-7000

EU0420 Transfer Belt KB-7200

EU0430 Transfer Belt KB-7400

EU0440 Elevator KB-7500

EU0450 Transfer Belt KB-7600

EU0460 Transfer Belt KB-7700

EU0470 Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801

EU0480 Transfer Belt R-3803

EU0490 Transfer Belt R-3700

EU0500 Kiln KB-5100

EU0510 Raw Mill System R-4300

EU0520 Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601

EU0530 Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602

EU0540 Raw Blend Silo B-0701

EU0550 Raw Blend Silo B-0702

EU0560 Raw Blend Silo B-0703

EU0570 Raw Blend Silo B-0704

EU0580 Transfer Belt KB-1200

EU0590 Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600

EU0600 Air Slide KB-1808

EU0610 Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700

EU0620 Truck Loading KB-3821

EU0630 CKD Storage Silo KB-3800

EU0640 CKD Storage Silo KB-3900

EU0650 Drag Conveyor KC-501

EU0660 Drag Conveyor KC-502

EU0670 Elevator KC-0601

EU0680 Elevator KC-0602

EU0690 Truck Loading

EU0700 Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100

EU0710 Clinker Storage Pile Farm

EU0720 Clinker Storage Pile Farm (Enclosed)

EU0730 Hopper Loading W-9200

EU0740 Transfer Belt W-7900

EU0750 Transfer Belt W-8200

EU0760 Transfer Belt KC-1000

EU0770 Diverter Box KC-0603

EU0780 Clinker Bin W-6601

EU0790 Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4)

EU0800 Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5)

EU0810 Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)

EU0820 Transfer Belt KC-2600
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 10

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0830 Transfer Belt KC-2620

EU0840 Clinker Silo KC-2901

EU0850 Clinker Silo KC-2902

EU0860 Clinker Silo KC-2903

EU0870 Transfer Belt KC-2630

EU0880 Weigh Feeder KC-3002

EU0890 Weigh Feeder KC-3005

EU0900 Weigh Feeder KC-3008

EU0910 Transfer Belt KC-3200

EU0920 Bucket Elevator KC-3400

EU0930 Bucket Elevator KC-2550

EU0940 Transfer Belt KC-3600

EU0950 Truck Loading

EU0960 Hopper TL-5000

EU0970 Transfer Belt TL-5300

EU0980 Transfer Belt TL-5500

EU0990 Barge Loading

EU1000 Drag Conveyor F-8701

EU1010 Drag Conveyor F-12701

EU1020 Elevator F-8702

EU1030 Elevator F-12702

EU1040 Finish Mill F-12900

EU1050 Finish Mill F-8900

EU1060 Separator F-13500

EU1070 Separator F-9500

EU1080 Hopper for Finish Mill #4

EU1090 Air Slide for Finish Mill #4

EU1100 Hopper for Finish Mill #5

EU1110 Air Slide for Finish Mill #5

EU1120 – EU1210 New Cement Silo 37 – 46

EU1220 – EU1370 Old Cement Silo 21 – 36

EU1380 – EU1400 River Cement Silo 47 – 49

EU1410 Cement Transfer Belt D-4800

EU1420 Cement Transfer Belt

EU1430 Transfer Belt D-4100

EU1440 Transfer Belt D-4200

EU1450 Barge Loading TL-0800

EU1460 Distribution Box D-6900

EU1470 Elevator TL-0400

EU1480 Air Slide

EU1490 Cement Bins (Truck)

EU1500 Truck Loading

EU1510 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500

EU1520 Truck Unloading

EU1530 – EU1560 Blend Tank

EU1570 – EU1580 Burn Tank

EU1590 Holding Tank

EU1600 Mixing Tank

EU1610 Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading

EU1620 Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 470 kW

EU1630 Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 500 kW
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 11

Project No. 031-0021-023

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS

The following list provides a description of the equipment that does not have unit specific

limitations at the time of permit issuance.

Description of Emission Source 

Drilling

Blasting

Raw Material Truck Unloading

Quarry Haul Road

Hopper (A-1601)

Primary Crusher (A-1700)

Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-1900)

Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-2000)

Chute (A-2002)

Transfer Belt From Crusher to Piles (A-2500)

Transfer Belt From Crusher to Piles (A-2600)

Transfer Belt to Piles #1 (A-3300)

Transfer Belt to Piles #4 (A-3400)

Raw Material Storage Pile – Limestone

Raw Material Storage Pile – Diaspore

Raw Material Storage Pile – Tripoli

Piles in Shed

Haul Road to Raw Material Storage

Raw Material Storage Pile (Gypsum)

Raw Material Storage Pile (Mill Scale)

Haul Road (CH02)

Solid Fuel Storage Pile (Coal)

Haul Road (TH02)

Solid Fuel Storage Pile (Tires)

Storage Pile (Partially Enclosed) (TH06)

Haul Road to Landfill

Clinker Haul Road (KP12A)

Clinker Loading Haul Road

Haul Road (AF01)

Miscellaneous Painting

4 Parts Washers – 35 Gallon – Mineral Spirits

Storage Tanks #2, 5 and 6 – 300 Gallon Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage

Storage Tanks #3 and 4 – 150 Gallon Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage

Storage Tank #7 – 8000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage (MS8)

Storage Tank #8 – 10,000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage (MS8)

Storage Tank #9 – 560 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Quarry Garage (MS03)

Storage Tank #10 – 1000 Gallon Used Oil Tank – Quarry Garage

Storage Tank #11 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Additive Crusher

Storage Tank #12 – 250 Gallon Diesel Tank – River Unloading Dock

Storage Tank #13 – 150 Gallon Diesel Tank – Spray Pond Pumps

Storage Tank #14 – 50,000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant (MS10)

Storage Tank #15 – 560 Gallon Diesel Tank – Courtyard (MS8)

Storage Tank #16 – 200 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant Emergency Generator

Storage Tank #17 – 300 Gallon Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot (MS6)

Storage Tank #17A – 300 Gallon Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot

Storage Tank #18 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant Parking Lot (MS8)

Storage Tank #19 – 300 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Plant Parking Lot

Storage Tank #20 – 550 Gallon Diesel Tank – Contractor Parking Lot
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 12

Project No. 031-0021-023

Storage Tank #21 – 300 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Contractor Parking Lot

Storage Tank #24 – 12,000 Gallon Air Entraining Tank – Plant Finish Mill

Storage Tank #27 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Waste Fuel Area (MS8)

Storage Tank #28 – 500 Gallon Diesel Tank – Elec. Room - 17

2 Space Heaters – Kerosene - 0.3 MMBTU/Hr

Vehicle Refueling (Diesel and Gasoline) – (AF10, MS04 and MS9)

Pump-Off Station/Pail Loading

Unloader/Crusher

Landfill

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

These documents have been incorporated by reference into this permit.

1) Construction Permit Number: 1197-012A;

2) Construction Permit Number: 0496-007.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 13

Project No. 031-0021-023

II. Plant Wide Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR)

for the full text of the applicable requirements.

Permit Condition PW001

10 CSR 10-6.170

Restriction of Particulate Matter to the Ambient Air Beyond the Premises of Origin

Emission Limitation:

No person may cause or allow to occur any handling, transporting or storing of any

material; construction, repair, cleaning or demolition of a building or its appurtenances;

construction or use of a road, driveway or open area; or operation of a commercial or

industrial installation without applying reasonable measures as may be required to

prevent, or in a manner which allows or may allow, fugitive particulate matter to go beyond

the premises of origin in quantities that the particulate matter:

• Remains visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin; or

• May be found on surfaces beyond the property line of origin.

The nature or origin of the particulate matter on these surfaces shall be determined

to a reasonable degree by a technique proven to be accurate and approved by the

Director.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall conduct inspections of its installation sufficient to determine compliance

with this regulation. If a violation of this regulation is discovered, the source shall undertake

corrective action to eliminate the violation.

The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner to the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

A log must be maintained noting the following:

• Whether air emissions (except water vapor) remain visible in the ambient air beyond the

property line of origin.

• Whether the visible emissions were normal for the installation.

• Equipment malfunctions that could cause an exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.170.

• Any violations of 10 CSR 10-6.170 and any corrective actions undertaken to correct the

violation.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Attachment A contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log, or an

equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, or any malfunction which could possibly cause an

exceedance of this regulation.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 14

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW002

10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M

National Emission Standard for Asbestos

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall follow the procedures and requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M for

any activities occurring at this installation which would be subject to provisions for 40 CFR

Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos.

Monitoring:

Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with registration, certification,

notification, and Abatement Procedures and Practices standards as specified in 40 CFR Part

61, Subpart M.

Record keeping:

Any appropriate record keeping as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

Reporting:

Any appropriate reporting as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

Permit Condition PW003

10 CSR 10-6.250

Asbestos Abatement Projects – Certification, Accreditation, and Business Exemption

Requirements

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall conduct all asbestos abatement projects within the procedures established

for certification and accreditation by 10 CSR 10-6.250.

• An individual must receive certification from the department before that individual

participates in an asbestos abatement project operating in Missouri according to

Section (3). This certification is annually renewable. Certification as an AHERA inspector,

AHERA management planner and AHERA project designer apply to AHERA-related

projects.

• To be a training provider for the purpose of this rule a school shall apply for accreditation

to the department and comply with the United States Environmental Protection Agency

AHERA Model Accreditation plan 40 CFR Part 763 Appendix C, Subpart E. Details of the

requirements for accreditation are found in Section (4).

Monitoring:

Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation

standards.

Record keeping:

Any appropriate record keeping to demonstrate compliance with Certification and

Accreditation standards.

Reporting:

Any appropriate reporting to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation

standards.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 15

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW004

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No person may discharge into the ambient air from any single source of emission whatsoever,

any air contaminant:

• Of a shade or density equal to or darker than that designated as No. 1 on the Ringlemann

Chart (20% opacity); or

• Of an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke

designated as No. 1 on the Ringlemann Chart (20% opacity).

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes air

contaminants of a shade or density not equal to nor darker than No. 3 (60% opacity) on the

Ringlemann Chart; or of an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree not equal to

nor greater than does smoke designated as No. 3 (60% opacity) on the Ringlemann Chart.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period

then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on each emission unit with a

stack or vent by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 16

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by 10 CSR 10-3.080 or 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could

cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition PW005

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.1354(b)(4) and (b)(5)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and

maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program of

corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to comply

with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all routine or

otherwise predictable CMS malfunctions. This plan shall be developed by the owner or operator

by the source’s compliance date for that relevant standard. The plan shall be incorporated by

reference into the source’s title V permit. The purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction

plan is to: (§63.6(e)(3)(i))

• Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources including

associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution

control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant

standards; (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(A))

• Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable

after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and

(§63.6(e)(3)(i)(B))

• Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction

(including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control

equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(C))

Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators

shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control

equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing

emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance

with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section.

(§63.6(e)(1)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 17

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all

times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified

in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan, the owner or operator shall keep records for

that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed. These records

may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of recordkeeping, that confirms

conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that event. In addition the

owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in §63.10(b) (and elsewhere in

this Part), including records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, or

malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution control equipment.

(§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures

specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall record

the actions taken for that event. ((§63.6(e)(3)(iv))

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(5), if actions taken by an owner or operator during a startup,

shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source (including actions taken to correct a

malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the source’s startup, shutdown,

and malfunction plan specified in §63.6(e)(3), the owner or operator shall state such

information in a semiannual report. Reports shall only be required if a startup, shutdown, or

malfunction occurred during the reporting period. The startup, shutdown, and malfunction

report may be submitted simultaneously with the excess emissions and continuous

monitoring system performance reports; and (§63.1354(b)(4))

• Any time an action taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures in the

startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall make an immediate

report of the actions taken for that event within two (2) working days, by telephone call or

facsimile (FAX) transmission. The immediate report shall be followed by a letter, certified by

the owner or operator or other responsible official, explaining the circumstances of the event,

the reasons for not following the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and whether any

excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred.

(§63.1354(b)(5))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after

June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 18

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW006

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Operations and Maintenance Plan §63.1350(a) and (b)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each portland cement plant shall prepare for each affected source

subject to the provisions of this subpart, a written operations and maintenance plan. The

plan shall include the following information: (§63.1350(a))

(1) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air pollution

control devices in order to meet the emission limits and operating limits of §§63.1343

through 63.1348; (§63.1350(a)(1))

(2) Corrective actions to be taken when required by paragraph (e) of this section; (§63.1350(a)(2))

(3) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion system of

each kiln and each in-line kiln raw mill located at the facility at least once per year; and

(§63.1350(a)(3))

(4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources subject to opacity standards

under §§63.1346 and 63.1348. Such procedures must include the provisions of paragraphs

(a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(iv) of this section. (§63.1350(a)(4))

(i) The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of

each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60.

The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

(ii) If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to

semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any

semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on

a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in

six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

(iii) If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to

annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly

basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emission are observed in six (6)

consecutive monthly test. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

(iv) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to

40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation

of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

• Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(b))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act are

enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards.

(§63.6(e)(1)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 19

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators

shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control

equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing

emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance

with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section.

(§63.6(e)(1)(ii))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the Operations and Maintenance plan on-site at all times.

The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural

Resources personnel upon request.

• As specified in the Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Reporting:

• The plan shall be submitted to the Administrator for review and approval as part of the

application for a Part 70 permit. (§63.1350(a))

• All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a) shall be included in the semiannual summary report.

(§63.1354(b)(9)(v))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after

June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition PW007

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Notification Requirements §63.1353, Reporting Requirements

§63.1354(a) and Record keeping Requirements §63.1355(a) and (b)

Emission Limitation:

• The notification provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A that apply and those that do not

apply to owners and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1

of this subpart. If any State requires a notice that contains all of the information required in a

notification listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of

the notice sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that notification.

(§63.1353(a))

• Each owner or operator subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply with the

notification requirements in §63.9 as listed below. (§63.1353(b))

Monitoring:

None

Record keeping:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 20

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operators shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this Part; and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

• Initial notifications as required by §63.9(b) through (d). For the purposes of this subpart, a

Title V or 40 CFR Part 70 permit application may be used in lieu of the initial notification

required under §63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit application

as required by §63.9(b), and the State to which the permit application has been submitted has

an approved operating permit program under Part 70 of this Chapter and has received

delegation of authority from the EPA. Permit applications shall be submitted by the same due

dates as those specified for the initial notification. (§63.1353(b)(1))

• Notification of performance tests, as required by §§63.7 and 63.9(e). (§63.1353(b)(2))

• Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by §63.1349 in accordance

with §§63.6(h)(5) and 63.9(f). (§63.1353(b)(3))

• Notification, as required by §63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor

performance evaluation required by §63.8(e) is scheduled to begin. (§63.1353(b)(4))

• Notification of compliance status, as required by §63.9(h). (§63.1353(b)(5))

• The reporting provisions of Subpart A of this part that apply and those that do not apply to

owners or operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this

subpart. If any State requires a report that contains all of the information required in a report

listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the report

sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that report. (§63.1354(a))

• As required by §63.10(d)(4), the owner or operator of an affected source who is required to

submit progress reports as a condition of receiving an extension of compliance under §63.6(i)

shall submit such reports by the dates specified in the written extension of compliance.

(§63.1354(b)(3))

• The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually which contains the

information specified in §63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include

(§63.1354(b)(9):

(1) All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in

§63.1344(a) and (b); (§63.1354(b)(9)(i)

(2) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required under

§63.1350(f)(7); and (§63.1354(b)(9)(ii))

(3) All failures to maintain the activated carbon injection rate, and the activated carbon injection

carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop, as applicable, as required under §63.1344(c).

(§63.1354(b)(9)(iii)

(4) The results of any combustion system component inspections conducted within the

reporting period as required under §63.1350(i). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iv))

(5) All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1354(b)(9)(v))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 21

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after

June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition PW008

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Performance Testing Requirements §63.1349

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of any affected source subject to this subpart shall demonstrate initial

compliance with the emission limits of §63.1343 and §63.1345 through §63.1348 using the

test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. (§63.1349(a))

Performance Testing:

Performance tests to demonstrate initial compliance with this subpart shall be conducted as

specified in §63.1349(b)(1) through §63.1349(b)(4). (§63.1349(b))

Monitoring:

As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7.

Record keeping:

• As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• Performance test results shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the

information required by §63.1349(a)(1) through (a)(10) of this section, as well as all other

relevant information. The plan to be followed during testing shall be made available to the

Administrator prior to testing, if requested. (§63.1349(a))

• A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system; (§63.1349(a)(1))

• Sampling location description(s); (§63.1349(a)(2))

• A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modification to standard

procedures; (§63.1349(a)(3))

• Test results; (§63.1349(a)(4))

• Quality assurance procedures and results; (§63.1349(a)(5))

• Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration

procedures; (§63.1349(a)(6))

• Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses; (§63.1349(a)(7))

• Documentation of calculation; (§63.1349(a)(8))

• All data recorded and used to establish parameters for compliance monitoring; and

(§63.1349(a)(9))

• Any other information required by the test method. (§63.1349(a)(10))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after

June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 22

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW009

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Alternate Monitoring Requirements §63.1350

Emission Limitation:

• An owner or operator may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternate

monitoring requirements to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this

subpart, except for emission standards for THC, subject to the provisions of §63.1350(l)(1)

through (l)(6). (§63.1350(l))

• The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case-by-case basis that additional or

alternative operating limits, or alternative approaches to establishing operating limits, are

necessary to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.

(§63.1350(l)(6))

Monitoring:

If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or

operator must continue to use the original monitoring requirement until approval is received

to use another monitoring requirement. (§63.1350(l)(2))

Record keeping:

• If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or

operator must continue to use the original record keeping requirements for the original

monitoring requirements until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 23

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than those specified in this

section, unless the owner or operator documents, using data or information, that the longer

averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the

performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct three

(3) runs of the performance test. (§63.1350(l)(1))

• The owner or operator shall submit the application for approval of alternate monitoring

requirements no later than the notification of performance test. The application must contain

the information specified in §63.1350(l)(3)(i) through (l)(3)(iii): (§63.1350(l)(3)

(1) Data or information justifying the request, such as the technical or economic infeasibility, or

the impracticality of using the required approach. (§63.1350(l)(3)(i))

(2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating

parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach and technique, the averaging period for

the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated; and (§63.1350(l)(3)(ii))

(3) Data or information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide

equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard.

(§63.1350(l)(3)(iii)

• The Administrator will notify the owner or operator of the approval or denial of the application

within ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of the original request, or within sixty (60)

calendar days of the receipt of any supplementary information, whichever is later. The

Administrator will not approve an alternate monitoring application unless it would provide

equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. Before

disapproving any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide

(§63.1350(l)(4)):

(1) Notice of the information and findings upon which the intended disapproval is based; and

(§63.1350(l)(4)(i))

(2) Notice of opportunity for the owner or operator to present additional supporting information

before final action is taken on the application. This notice will specify how much additional

time is allowed for the owner or operator to provide additional supporting information.

(§63.1350(l)(4)(ii))

• The owner or operator is responsible for submitting any supporting information in a timely

manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application prior to the performance test.

Neither submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or disapprove

the application relieves the owner or operator of the responsibility to comply with any

provision of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(5))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after

June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 24

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW010

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Monitoring and Compliance Provisions §63.1206(a) through (b)(5)

Emission Limitation:

• The emission standards and operating requirements apply at all times except:

(§63.1206(b)(1)(i))

(1) During startup, shutdown and malfunction, provided that hazardous waste is not in the

combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste feed to the combustor has been cutoff for a

period of time not less than the hazardous waste residence time) during those periods of

operation as provided by §63.1206(c)(2)(ii); and (§63.1206(b)(1)(i))

(2) When hazardous waste is not in the combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste feed to

the combustor has been cutoff for a period of time not less than the hazardous waste

residence time), and you have: (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii))

(i) Submitted a written, one (1)-time notice to the Administrator documenting compliance

with all applicable requirements and standards promulgated under authority of the

Clean Air Act, including sections 112 and 129; and (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(A))

(ii) Documented in the operating record that you are complying with such applicable

requirements in lieu of the emission standards and operating requirements of this

subpart. (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(B))

• If the permittee plans to change (as defined in §63.1206(b)(5)(iii)) the design operation, or

maintenance practices of the source in a manner that may adversely affect compliance with an

emission standard that is not monitored with a CEMS: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i))

(1) Restriction on Waste Burning – Except as provided by §63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2), after the

change and prior to submitting the notification of compliance, the permittee must not burn

hazardous waste for more than a total of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at

the discretion of the Administrator) and only for purposes of pretesting or comprehensive

performance testing. Pretesting is defined at §63.1207(h)(2)(i) and (ii).

(§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(1))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance – If the permittee determines that a change will

not adversely affect compliance with the emission standards or operating requirements, the

permittee must document the change in the operating record upon making such change. The

permittee must revise as necessary the performance test plan, Documentation of Compliance,

Notification of Compliance, and start-up, shutdown, and malfunction plan to reflect these

changes. (§63.1206(b)(5)(ii))

• Definition of Change – “Change means any change in design, operation, or maintenance

practices that were documented in the comprehensive performance test plan, Notification of

Compliance, or startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan. (§63.1206(b)(5)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 25

Project No. 031-0021-023

Compliance Dates:

• The permittee must comply with the standards of this subpart no later than September 30,

2002, unless the Administrator grants an extension of time under §63.6(i) or §63.1213, or you

comply with the requirements of §63.1206(a)(2) for sources that do not intend to comply with

the emission standards. (§63.1206(a)(1))

• Sources that do not intend to comply. Except for those sources meeting the requirements of

§63.1210(b)(10)(iv), sources: (§63.1206(a)(2))

(1) That signify in their Notification of Intent to Comply (NIC) an intent not to comply with the

requirements of this subpart, must stop burning hazardous waste on or before October 1,

2001. (§63.1206(a)(2)(i))

(2) That do not intent do comply with this subpart must include in their NIC a schedule that

includes key dates for the steps to be taken to stop burning hazardous waste. Key dates

include the date for submittal of RCRA closure documents required under Subpart G, Part

264, of this Chapter. (§63.1206(a)(2)(ii))

• For a standard in this subpart that is more stringent than the standard proposed on April 19,

1996, the permittee may achieve compliance no later than September 30, 2002 if the permittee

complies with the standard proposed on April 19, 1996 after September 30, 1999. This

exception does not apply to new or reconstructed area source hazardous waste combustors

that become major sources after September 30, 1999. As provided by §63.6(b)(7), such

sources must comply with this subpart at startup. (§63.1206(a)(3)(ii))

Monitoring:

• The Administrator will determine compliance with the emission standards of this subpart as

provided by §63.6(f)(2). Conducting performance testing under operating conditions

representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is consistent with the requirements

of §§63.6(f)(2)(iii)(B) and 63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under representative

operating conditions. (§63.1206(b)(2))

• The Administrator will make a finding concerning compliance with the emission standards and

other requirements of this subpart as provided by §63.6(f)(3). (§63.1206(b)(3))

• The Administrator may grant an extension of compliance with the emission standards of this

subpart as provided by §§63.6(i) and 63.1213. (§63.1206(b)(4))

Record keeping:

• The permittee must document the change in the operating record upon making a change in

design, operation or maintenance. The permittee must revise as necessary the performance

test plan, Documentation of Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and start-up, shutdown,

and malfunction plan to reflect these changes. (§63.1206(b)(5)(ii))

• The permittee must maintain copies of the performance test plan, Documentation of

Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction plan. The

permittee shall keep a copy of the plans, documentation, and notifications on-site at all times.

The plans, documentation, and notifications shall be made available immediately for

inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 26

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the permittee plans to change the design, operation or maintenance practices of the source

in a manner that may adversely affect compliance with an emission standard that is not

monitored with a CEMS: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i))

• Notification – The permittee must notify the Administrator at least sixty (60) days prior to the

change, unless the permittee documents circumstances that dictate that such prior notice is

not reasonably feasible. The notification must include: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A))

• A description of the changes and which emission standards may be affected; and

(§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A)(1))

• A comprehensive performance test schedule and test plan under the requirements of

§63.1207(f) that will document compliance with the affected emission standard(s);

(§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A)(2))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance - Restriction on Waste Burning – The permittee

may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous waste in the

interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than testing or

pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on operating

parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission standards

of this subpart based on available information. The Administrator will review, modify as

necessary, and approve if warranted the interim operating requirements.

(§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW011

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Operating Requirements – General - §63.1206(c)(1)

 - Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan - §63.1206(c)(2)

 - Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff (AWFCO) - §63.1206(c)(3)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 27

Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must operate only under the operating requirements specified in the

Documentation of Compliance under §63.1211(d) or the Notification of Compliance under

§§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d), except: (§63.1206(c)(1)(i))

(1) During performance tests under approved test plans according to §63.1207(e), (f) and (g),

and (§63.1206(c)(1)(i)(A))

(2) Under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(1)(i) or (ii). (§63.1206(c)(1)(i)(B))

• The Documentation of Compliance and the Notification of Compliance must contain operating

requirements including, but not limited to, the operating requirements in §63.1206(c) and

§63.1209. (§63.1206(c)(1)(ii))

• Failure to comply with the operating requirements is failure to ensure compliance with the

emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1206(c)(1)(iii))

• Operating requirements in the Notification of Compliance are applicable requirements for

purposes of Parts 70 and 71 of this Chapter. (§63.1206(c)(1)(iv))

• The operating requirements specified in the Notification of Compliance will be incorporated in

the Title V permit. (§63.1206(c)(1)(v))

• Except as provided by §63.1260(c)(2)(ii), the permittee is subject to the Start-up, Shutdown

and Malfuntion plan requirements of §63.6(e)(3). (§63.1206(c)(2)(i))

• Even if the permittee follows the startup and shutdown procedures and the corrective

measures upon a malfunction that are prescribed in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion

plan, the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart apply if hazardous

waste is in the combustion chamber (i.e., if you are feeding hazardous waste or if startup,

shutdown, or a malfunction occurs before the hazardous waste residence time has transpired

after hazardous waste cutoff). (§63.1206(c)(2)(ii))

• The permittee must record the plan in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(2)(iv))

• The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and

maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program

of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to

comply with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all

routine or otherwise predictable CMS malfunctions. This plan shall be developed by the owner

or operator by the source’s compliance date for that relevant standard. The plan shall be

incorporated by reference into the source’s Title V permit. The purpose of the startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan is to: (§63.6(e)(3)(i))

(1) Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources

including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air

pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all

relevant standards; (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(A))

(2) Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable

after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and

(§63.6(e)(3)(i)(B))

(3) Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction

(including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control

equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(C))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 28

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Upon the compliance date, the permittee must operate the hazardous waste combustor with a

functioning system that immediately and automatically cuts off the hazardous waste feed,

except as provided by §63.1206(c)(3)(viii): (§63.1206(c)(3)(i))

(1) When any of the following are exceeded: Operating parameter limits specified under

§63.1209; an emission standard monitored by a CEMS; or the allowable combustion

chamber pressure; (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(A))

(2) When the span value of any CMS detector, except a CEMS, is met or exceeded;

((§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(B))

(3) Upon malfunction of a CMS monitoring an operating parameter limit specified under

§63.1209 or an emission level; or (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(C))

(4) When any component of the automatic waste feed cutoff system fails. (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(D))

• Ducting of Combustion Gases – During an AWFCO, the permittee must continue to duct

combustion gasses to the air pollution control system while hazardous waste remains in the

combustion chamber (i.e., if the hazardous waste residence time has not transpired since the

hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated). (§63.1206(c)(3)(ii))

• Restarting Waste Feed – The permittee must continue to monitor during the cutoff the

operating parameters for which limits are established under §63.1209 and the emissions

required under that section to be monitored by a CEMS, and the permittee must not restart

the hazardous waste feed until the operating parameters and emission levels are within the

specified limits. (§63.1206(c)(3)(iii))

• Failure of the AWFCO System – If the AWFCO system fails to automatically and immediately

cutoff the flow of hazardous waste upon exceedance of parameter required to be interlocked

with the AWFCO system under §63.1206(c)(3)(i), the permittee has failed to comply with the

AWFCO requirements of §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1206(c)(3)(iv))

• Ramping Down Waste Feed – The permittee may ramp down the waste feedrate of pumpable

hazardous waste over a period not to exceed one (1) minute, except as provided by

§63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(B). If the permittee elects to ramp down the waste feed, the permittee must

document ramp down procedures in the operating and maintenance plan. The procedures

must specify that the ramp down begins immediately upon initiation of automatic waste feed

cutoff and the procedures must prescribe a bona fide ramping down. If an emission standard

or operating limit is exceeded during the ramp down, the permittee has failed to comply with

the emission standards or operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(A))

• Ramping Down Waste Feed – If the automatic waste feed cutoff is triggered by an exceedance

of any of the following operating limits, the permittee may not ramp down the waste feed

cutoff: Minimum combustion chamber temperature, maximum hazardous waste feedrate, or

any hazardous waste firing system operating limits that may be established for the permittee’s

combustor. (§63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(B))

Testing:

• The AWFCO system and associated alarms must be tested at least weekly to verify operability,

unless the permittee documents in the operating record that weekly inspections will unduly

restrict or upset operations and that less frequent inspection will be adequate. At a minimum,

the permittee must conduct operability testing at least monthly. The permittee must

document and record in the operating record AWFCO operability test procedures and results.

(§63.1206(c)(3)(vii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 29

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator of an affected

source shall operate and maintain such source (including associated air pollution control

equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and

malfunction plan developed under paragraph (e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(3)(ii))

• Corrective Measures – If, after any AWFCO, there is an exceedance of an emission standard or

operating requirement, irrespective of whether the exceedance occurred while hazardous waste

remained in the combustion chamber (i.e., whether the hazardous waste residence time has

transpired since the hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated), the permittee must

investigate the cause of the AWFCO, take appropriate corrective measures to minimize future

AWFCOs, and record the findings and corrective measure in the operating record.

(§63.1206(c)(3)(v))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all

times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified

in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan, the owner or operator shall keep records for

that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed. These records

may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of recordkeeping, that confirms

conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that event. In addition the

owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in §63.10(b) (and elsewhere in

this part), including records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, or

malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution control equipment.

(§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures

specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall record

the actions taken for that event. (§63.6(e)(3)(iv))

Reporting:

Excessive Exceedance Reporting –

• For each set of ten (10) exceedances of an emission standard or operating requirement while

hazardous waste remains in the combustion chamber (i.e., when the hazardous waste

residence time has not transpired since the hazardous waste feed was cutoff) during a sixty

(60) day block period, the permittee must submit to the Administrator a written report within

five (5) calendar days of the 10th exceedance documenting the exceedances and results of the

investigation and corrective measures taken. (§63.1206(c)(3)(vi)(A))

• On a case-by-case basis, the Administrator may require excessive exceedance reporting when

fewer than ten (10) exceedances occur during a sixty (60) day period. (§63.1206(c)(3)(vi)(B))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 30

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW012

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Operating Requirements - Combustion System Leaks - §63.1206(c)(5)

Emission Limitation:

Combustion system leaks of hazardous air pollutants must be controlled by: (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)

• Keeping the combustion zone sealed to prevent combustion system leaks; or

(§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(A))

• Maintaining the maximum combustion zone pressure lower than ambient pressure using an

instantaneous monitor; or (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(B))

Alternate Standard Provision:

Upon prior written approval of the Administrator, an alternative means of control to provide

control of combustion system leaks equivalent to maintenance of combustion zone pressure lower

than ambient pressure. (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(C))

Operating Parameters:

If the permittee complies with the requirements for combustion system leaks under §63.1206(c)(5)

by maintaining the maximum combustion chamber zone pressure lower than ambient pressure,

the permittee must monitor the pressure instantaneously and the automatic waste feed cutoff

system must be engaged when negative pressure is not maintained at any time. (§63.1209(p))

Monitoring:

• Good Operating and Maintenance Practices.

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in

conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the

manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and

calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 31

Project No. 031-0021-023

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

Record keeping:

• The permittee must specify in the operating record the method used for control of combustion

system leaks. (§63.1206(c)(5)(ii))

• If the permittee complies with the requirements for combustion system leaks under

§63.1206(c)(5) by maintaining the maximum combustion chamber zone pressure lower than

ambient pressure, the permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous

monitoring system.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW013

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Record keeping and Reporting Requirements - §63.1211(a)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Excess Emissions and Continuous Monitoring System Performance

Report and Summary Report - §63.10(e)(3)

Emission Limitation:

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as required in §63.10(e)(3). (§63.1211(a))

• The permittee of an affected source required to install a CMS by a relevant standard shall

submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and/or a

summary report to the Administrator semiannually, except when: (§63.10(e)(3)(i))

(1) More frequent reporting is specifically required by a relevant standard; (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(A))

(2) The Administrator determines on a case-by-case basis that more frequent reporting is

necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of the source; or (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(B))

(3) The CMS data are to be used directly for compliance determination and the source

experienced excess emissions, in which case quarterly reports shall be submitted. Once a

source reports excess emissions, the source shall follow a quarterly reporting format until a

request to reduce reporting frequency under §63.10(e)(3)(ii) is approved. (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(C))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 32

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee who is required by a relevant standard to submit excess emissions and

continuous monitoring system performance (and summary) reports on a quarterly (or more

frequent) basis may reduce the frequency of reporting for that standard to semiannual if the

following conditions are met: (§63.10(e)(3)(ii))

1) For one (1) fullyear (e.g., four (4) quarterly or twelve (12) monthly reporting periods) the

affected source’s excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance reports

continually demonstrate that the source is in compliance with the relevant standard;

(§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(A))

2) The permittee continues to comply with all record keeping and monitoring requirements

specified in this subpart and the relevant standard; (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(B))

3) The Administrator does object to a reduced frequency of reporting for the affected source, as

provided in §63.10(e)(3)(iii). (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(C))

• As soon as CMS data indicate that the source is not in compliance with any emission

limitation or operating parameter specified in the relevant standard, the frequency of reporting

shall revert to the frequency specified in the relevant standard, and the permittee shall submit

an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (a summary) report for

the noncomplying emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following the

noncomplying event. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant standard for

another full year, the permittee may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce

the frequency of reporting for that standard, as provided for in §63.10(e)(3)(ii) and

§63.10(e)(3)(iii). (§63.10(e)(3)(iv))

• All excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports and all summary reports, if

required, shall be delivered or post-marked by the 30th day following the end of each calendar

half or quarter, as appropriate. (§63.10(e)(3)(v))

• If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter exceedance for

the reporting period is less than one percent (1%) of the total operating time for the reporting

period, and CMS downtime for the reporting period is less than five percent (5%) of the total

operating time for the reporting period, only the summary report shall be submitted and the

full excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report need not be

submitted unless required by the Administrator. (§63.10(e)(3)(vii))

• If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter exceedance for

the reporting period is one percent (1%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting

period, the total CMS downtime for the reporting period is five percent (5%) or greater of the

total operating time for the reporting period, both the summary report and the excess

emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report shall be submitted.

(§63.10(e)(3)(viii))

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

The permittee shall maintain copies of the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system

performance report and/or summary report. The permittee shall keep a copy of the reports on

site at all times. The reports shall be made available immediately for inspection to the

Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 33

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The frequency of reporting of excess emissions and continuous monitoring system

performance (and summary) reports required to comply with a relevant standard may be

reduced only after the permittee notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to

make such a change and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In

deciding whether to approve a reduced frequency of reporting, the Administrator may review

information concerning the source’s entire previous performance history during the five (5)

year record keeping period prior to the intended change, including performance test results,

monitoring data and evaluations of an owner or operator’s conformance with operation and

maintenance requirements. Such information may be used by the Administrator to make a

judgement about the source’s potential for noncompliance in the future. If the Administrator

disapproves the permittee’s request to reduce the frequency of reporting, the Administrator

will notify the permittee in writing within forty-five (45) days after receiving notice of the owner

or operator’s intention. The notification from the Administrator to the permittee will specify

the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval

within forty-five (45) days, approval is automatically granted. (§63.10(e)(3)(iii))

• As soon as CMS data indicate that the source is not in compliance with any emission

limitation or operating parameter specified in the relevant standard, the permittee shall

submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (an summary)

report for the noncomplying emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following

the noncomplying event. (§63.10(e)(3)(iv))

• Written reports of excess emissions or exceedances of process or control system parameters

shall include all the information required in §63.10(c)(5) through (c)(13), in §63.8(c)(7) and

§63.8(c)(8), and in the relevant standard, and they shall contain the name, title, and signature

of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report. When no excess

emissions or exceedances of a parameter have occurred, or a CMS has not been inoperative,

out of control, repaired, or adjusted, such information shall be stated in the report.

(§63.10(e)(3)(v))

• As required under §63.10(e)(3)(vii) and (viii), one (1) summary report shall be submitted for the

hazardous air pollutants monitored at each affected source (unless the relevant standard

specifies that more than one (1) summary report is required, e.g., one (1) summary report for

each hazardous air pollutant monitored). The summary report shall be entitled “Summary

Report – Gaseous and Opacity Excess Emission and Continuous Monitoring system

Performance” and shall contain the following information: (§63.10(e)(3)(vi))

(1) The company name and address of the affected source; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(A))

(2) An identification of each hazardous air pollutant monitored at the affected source;

(§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(B))

(3) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting period; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(C))

(4) A brief description of the process units; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(D))

(5) The emission and operating parameter limitations specified in the relevant standard(s);

(§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(E))

(6) The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s); (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(F))

(7) The date of the latest CMS certification or audit; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(G))

(8) The total operating time of the affected source during the reporting period;

(§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(H))

(9) An emission data summary (or similar summary if the permittee monitors control system

parameters), including the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period

(recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of excess emissions

expressed ass a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and

a breakdown of the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period into those

that are due to startup/shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other

known causes, and other unknown causes; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(I))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 34

Project No. 031-0021-023

(10) A CMS performance summary (or similar summary if the permittee monitors control

system parameter), including the total CMS downtime during the reporting period (recorded

in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of CMS downtime, expressed

as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and a

breakdown of the total CMS downtime during the reporting period into periods that are due

to monitoring equipment malfunctions, nonmonitoring equipment malfunctions, quality

assurance/quality control calibrations, other known causes, and other unknown causes;

(§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(J))

(11) A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls since the last reporting

period; ((§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(K))

(12) The name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy

of the report; and (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(L))

(13) The date of the report. (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(M))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW014

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Operating Requirements – Operator Training and Certification -

§63.1206(c)(6)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must establish training programs for all categories of personnel whose activities

may reasonably be expected to directly affect emissions of hazardous air pollutants from the

source. Such persons include, but are not limited to chief facility operators, control room

operators, continuous monitoring system operators, persons that sample and analyze

feedstreams, persons that manage and charge feedstreams to the combustor, persons that

operate emission control devices, and ash and waste handlers. Each training program shall

be of a technical level commensurate with the person’s job duties specified in the training

manual. Each commensurate training program shall require an examination to be

administered by the instructor at the end of the training course. Passing of this test shall be

deemed the “certification for personnel, except that for control room operators and shift

supervisors, the training and certification programs shall be as specified in §63.1206(c)(6)(iii)

and (iv). (§63.1206(c)(6)(i))

• The permittee must ensure that the source is operated and maintained at all times by persons

who are trained and certified to perform these and any other duties that may affect emissions

of hazardous air pollutants. (§63.1206(c)(6)(ii))

• The training and certification program must be approved by the state or the Administrator and

must be complete and reliable and conform to principles of good operator and operating

practices (including training and certification). (§63.1206(c)(6)(iv))

Monitoring:

• The permittee must establish a training and certification program for each person who has

responsibilities affecting operations that may affect emissions of hazardous air pollutants from

the source. (§63.1206(c)(6)(i))

Record keeping:

• The permittee must record the operator training and certification program in the operating

record. (§63.1206(c)(6)(v))

• The permittee shall maintain training records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months

and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural

Resources personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 35

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

None

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW015

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Operating Requirements – Operation and Maintenance Plan - §63.1206(c)(7)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must prepare and at all times operate according to an operation and

maintenance plan that describes in detail procedures for operation, inspection, maintenance

and corrective measures for all components of the combustor, including associated pollution

control equipment, that could affect emissions of regulated hazardous air pollutants.

(§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(A))

• The plan must prescribe how the permittee will operate and maintain the combustor in a

manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least

to the levels achieved during the comprehensive performance test. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(B))

• The plan ensures compliance with the operation and maintenance requirements of §63.6(e)

and minimizes emissions of pollutants, automatic waste feed cutoffs and malfunctions.

(§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(C))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act are

enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards.

(§63.6(e)(1)(iii))

Monitoring:

• As specified in the operation and maintenance plan.

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators

shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control

equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing

emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance

with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section.

(§63.6(e)(1)(ii))

Record keeping:

• The permittee must record the plan in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(D))

• The permittee shall maintain the records specified in the operation and maintenance plan. The

permittee shall maintain training records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and

shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural

Resources personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

None

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 36

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW016

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Operating Requirements – Summary of Notification Requirements -

§63.1210(a) – Summary of Reporting Requirements - §63.1211(a)

Notification, Request, Petition or Application:

Summary of Requirements: (§63.1210(a))

• The permittee must submit the following notifications to the Administrator: (§63.1210(a)(1))

(1) Initial Notifications that the permittee is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as

specified in §63.9(b).

(2) Notification of Intent to Comply as specified in §63.1210(b) and (c).

(3) Notification that the permittee is subject to special compliance requirements as specified in

§63.9(d).

(4) Notification of performance test and continuous monitoring system evaluation, including the

performance test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan (The permittee may also be

required on a case-by-case basis to submit a feedstream analysis plan under §63.1209(c)(3))

as specified in §63.1207(e), §63.9(e), §63.9(g)(1) and (3).

(5) Notification of compliance, including results of performance tests and continuous monitoring

system performance evaluations as specified in §63.1210(d), §63.1207(j), §63.9(h),

§63.10(d)(2) and §63.10(e)(2).

(6) Notifications of changes in design, operation, or maintenance as specified §63.1206(b)(5).

(7) Notification and documentation of any change in information already provided under §63.9

as specified in §63.9(j).

• The permittee must submit the following notifications to the Administrator if the permittee

requests or elects to comply with alternative requirements: (§63.1210(a)(2))

(1) The permittee may request an extension of the compliance date for up to one (1) year as

specified in §63.1206(b)(5), §63.1213, §63.6(i) and §63.9(c).

(2) The permittee may request an adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for

submittal and review of required information as specified in §63.9(i).

(3) The permittee may request approval of the following as specified in §63.1209(g)(1):

(i) Alternative monitoring methods, except for standards that the permittee must monitor

with a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) and except for requests to use

a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limits; or

(ii) A waiver of an operating parameter limit.

(4) The permittee may request the following as specified in §63.1209(a)(5) and §63.8(f):

(i) Approval of alternative monitoring methods for compliance with standards that are

monitored with a CEMS; and

(ii) Approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limits.

(5) Notification that the permittee elects to comply with the emission averaging requirements for

cement kilns with in-line raw mills as specified in §63.1204(d)(2).

(6) Notification that the permittee elects to document compliance with all applicable

requirements and standards promulgated under authority of the Clean Air Act, including

Sections 112 and 129, in lieu of the requirements of Subpart EEE of this Part when not

burning hazardous waste as specified in §63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(A).

(7) The permittee may request to burn hazardous waste for more than seven hundred twenty

(720) hours and for purposes other than testing or pretesting after making a change in the

design or operation that could affect compliance with emission standards and prior to

submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as specified in §63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2).
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 37

Project No. 031-0021-023

(8) If the permittee elects to conduct particulate matter CEMS correlation testing and wishes to

have federal particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits

waived during the testing, the permittee must notify the Administrator by submitting the

correlation test plan for review and approval as specified in §63.1206(b)(9)(iii)(B).

(9) Owners and operators of cement kilns may request approval of alternative emission

standards for mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and hydrochloric acid/chlorine

gas under certain conditions as specified in §63.1206(b)(10).

(10) The permittee may request to base initial compliance on data in lieu of a comprehensive

performance test as specified in §63.1207(c)(2).

(11) The permittee may request more than sixty (60) days to complete a performance test if

additional time is needed for reasons beyond the permittee’s control as specified in

§63.1207(d)(3).

(12) The permittee may request up to a one (1)-year time extension for conducting a

performance test (other than the initial comprehensive performance test) to consolidate

testing with other state or federally-required testing as specified in §63.1207(i).

(13) The permittee may request more than ninety (90) days to submit a Notification of

Compliance after completing a performance test if additional time is needed for reasons

beyond the permittee’s control as specified in §63.1207(j)(4).

(14) After failure of a performance test, the permittee may request to burn hazardous waste

for more than seven hundred twenty (720) hours and for purposes other than testing or

pretesting as specified in §63.1207(l)(3).

(15) The permittee may request to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits as specified in

§63.1209(l)(1).

(16) The permittee may request to extrapolate semivolatile and low volatile metal feedrate

limits as specified in §63.1209(n)(2)(ii).

(17) The permittee may request to reduce the frequency of excess emissions and CMS

performance reports as specified in §63.10(e)(3)(ii).

(18) The permittee may request to waive record keeping or reporting requirements as

specified in §63.10(f).

(19) The permittee may request to use data compression techniques to record data on a less

frequent basis than required by §63.1209 as specified in §63.1211(e).

Record keeping:

• The permittee must retain the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c))

(1) General information required to document and maintain compliance with the regulations of

Subpart EEE, including data recorded by continuous monitoring systems (CMS), and copies

of all notifications, reports, plan and other documents submitted to the Administrator as

specified in §63.1201(a), §63.10(b) and (c).

(2) Documentation of compliance as specified in §63.1211(d).

(3) Documentation and results of the automatic waste feed cutoff operability testing as specified

in §63.1206(c)(3)(vii).

(4) Feedstream analysis plan as specified in §63.1209(c)(2).

(5) Documentation of compliance with the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns

with in-line raw mills as specified in §63.1204(d)(3).

(6) If the permittee elects to comply with all applicable requirements and standards promulgated

under authority of the Clean Air Act, including Sections 112 and 129, in lieu of the

requirements of Subpart EEE when not burning hazardous waste, the permittee must

document in the operating record that the permittee is in compliance with those

requirements as specified in §63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(B).

(7) Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction plan as specified in §63.1206(c)(2).

(8) Corrective measure for any automatic waste feed cutoff that results in an exceedance of an

emission standard or operating parameter limit as specified in §63.1206(c)(3)(v).
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 38

Project No. 031-0021-023

(9) Operator training and certification program as specified in §63.1206(c)(6).

• If used, documentation that a substitute activated carbon, dioxin/furan formation reaction

inhibitor, or dry scrubber sorbent will provide the same level of control as the original material

as specified in §63.1209(k)(6)(iii), §63.1209(k)(7)(ii), §63.1209(k)(9)(ii) and §63.1209(o)(4)(iii).

Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the following reports to the Administrator: (§63.1211(a))

(1) Compliance progress report associated and submitted with the notification of intent to

comply as specified in §63.1211(b).

(2) Compliance progress reports, if required as a condition of an extension of the compliance

date granted under §63.6(i) as specified in §63.10(d)(4).

(3) Excessive exceedances reports as specified in §63.1206(c)(3)(vi).

(4) Periodic startup, shutdown and malfunction reports as specified in §63.10(d)(5)(i).

(5) Immediate startup, shutdown and malfunction reports as specified in §63.10(d)(5)(ii).

(6) Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in §63.10(e)(3).

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW017

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Notification of Intent to Comply (NIC) - §§63.1210(b) and (c), §63.1211(b) and

§63.1212

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must prepare a Notification of Intent to Comply that contains the information

listed below: (§63.1210(b)(1))

• The permittee must make a draft of the NIC available for public review no later than thirty (30)

days prior to the public meeting required under §63.1210(c)(1). (§63.1210(b)(2))

• The permittee must submit the final NIC to the Administrator no later than October 2, 2000.

(§63.1210(b)(3))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 39

Project No. 031-0021-023

• NIC public meeting and notice. (§63.1210(c))

(1) Prior to the submission of the NIC to the permitting agency, and no later than July 31, 2000,

the permittee must hold at least one (1) informal meeting with the public to discuss

anticipated activities described in the draft NIC for achieving compliance with the emission

standards of this subpart. The permittee must post a sign-in sheet or otherwise provide a

voluntary opportunity for attendees to provide their names and addresses. (§63.1210(c)(1)

(2) The permittee must submit a summary of the meeting, along with the list of attendees and

their addresses developed under §63.1210(c)(1), and copies of any written comments or

materials submitted at the meeting, to the Administrator as part of the final NIC, in

accordance with §63.1210(b)(1)(iii). (§63.1210(c)(2))

(3) The permittee must provide public notice of the NIC meeting at least thirty (30) days prior to

the meeting. The permittee must provide public notice in all of the following forms:

(§63.1210(c)(3))

(i) The permittee must publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county

or equivalent jurisdiction of the facility. In addition, the permittee must publish the

notice in newspapers of general circulation in adjacent counties or equivalent

jurisdiction where such publication would be necessary to inform the affected public.

The permittee must publish the notice as a display advertisement. (§63.1210(c)(3)(i))

(ii) The permittee must post a notice on a clearly marked sign at or near the source. If the

permittee places the sign on the site of the hazardous waste combustor, the sign must

be large enough to be readable from the nearest spot where the public would pass by

the site. (§63.1210(c)(3)(ii))

(iii) The permittee must broadcast a notice at least once on at least one (1) local radio

station or television station. (§63.1210(c)(3)(iii))

(iv) The permittee must provide a copy of the notice to the facility mailing list in accordance

with §124.10(c)(1)(ix) of this Chapter. (§63.1210(c)(3)(iv))

• Not later than October 1, 2001, the permittee must comply with the following, unless the

permittee complies with §63.1211(b)(2)(ii): (§63.1211(b)(1))

(1) Develop engineering design for any physical modifications to the source needed to comply

with the emission standards of this subpart; (§63.1211(b)(1)(i))

(2) Submit applicable construction applications to the Administrator; and (§63.1211(b)(1)(ii))

(3) Document an internal or external commitment of resources, i.e., funds or personnel, to

purchase, fabricate, and install any equipment, devices and ancillary structures needed to

comply with the emission standards of this subpart. §63.1211(b)(1)(iii))

• If the permittee does not comply with §63.1211(b)(1) or (b)(2)(ii), the permittee must stop

burning hazardous waste on or before October 1, 2001. (§63.1211(b)(2)(iii))

• If the permittee signifies in the progress report, submitted not later than October 1, 2001, the

intention not to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this

subpart, the permittee must stop burning hazardous waste on or before October 1, 2001 and

the permittee is exempt from the requirements of §63.1211(b)(1) through (b)(3).

(§63.1211(b)(5)(ii))

• The NIC and Progress Report must contain the following certification signed and dated by an

authorized representative of the source: I certify under penalty of law that I have personally

examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all

attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for

obtaining the information, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am

aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the

possibility of fine and imprisonment. (§63.1212(a)(1))

• An authorized representative is the same as a “responsible official” as defined under §63.2.

(§63.1212(a)(2))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 40

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the Notification of Compliance and Progress reports in

the operating record. (§63.1211(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the Notification of Compliance and Progress Reports on

site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the

Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

Reporting:

Notification of Intent to Comply

• The Notification of Intent to Comply includes the following information: (§63.1210(b)(1))

(1) General Information: (§63.1210(b)(1)(i))

(i) The name and address of the owner/operator and the source; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(A))

(ii) Whether the source is a major or an area source; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(B))

(iii) Waste minimization and emission control technique(s) being considered;

(§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(C))

(iv) Emission monitoring technique(s) the permittee is considering; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(D))

(v) Waste minimization and emission control technique(s) effectiveness.

(§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(E))

(vi) A description of the evaluation criteria used or to be used to select waste minimization

and/or emission control technique(s); and (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(F))

(vii) A statement that the permittee intends to comply with the emission standards of this

subpart. (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(G))

(2) Information on key activities and estimated dates for these activities that will bring the

source into compliance with emission control requirements of this subpart. The submission

of key activities and dates is not intended to be static and the permittee may revise them

during the period the NIC is in effect. The permittee must submit revisions to the

Administrator and make them available to the public. The permittee must include the

following key activities and dates: (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii))

(i) The dates by which the permittee will develop engineering designs for emission control

systems or process changes for emissions; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A))

(ii) The date by which the permittee will commit internal or external resources for installing

emission control systems or making process changes for emission control, or the date

by which the permittee will issue orders for the purchase of component parts to

accomplish emission control or process changes; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(B))

(iii) The date by which the permittee will submit construction applications;

(§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(C))

(iv) The date by which the permittee will initiate on-site construction, installation of

emission control equipment, or process change; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(D))

(v) The date by which the permittee will complete on-site construction, installation of

emission control equipment, or process change; and (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(E))

(vi) The date by which the permittee will achieve final compliance. The individual dates and

milestones listed in §63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (F) as part of the NIC are not

requirements and therefore are not enforceable deadlines; the requirements of

§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (F) must be included as part of the NIC only to inform the

public of the permittee’s intention to comply with the emission standards of this

subpart. (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(F))

(3) A summary of the public meeting required under §63.1210(c). (§63.1210(b)(1)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 41

Project No. 031-0021-023

(4) If the permittee does not intend to comply, but will not stop burning hazardous waste by

October 1, 2001 a certification that: (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv))

(i) The permittee will stop burning hazardous waste on or before September 30, 2002; and

(§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(A))

(ii) It is necessary to combust the hazardous waste from another on-site source, during the

year prior to September 30, 2002 because that other source is: (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B))

(A)Installing equipment to come into compliance with the emission standards of this

subpart; or (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B)(1))

(B) Installing source reduction modifications to eliminate the need for further combustion

of wastes. (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B)(2))

NIC Public Meeting and Notice

• The permittee must include the following in the notices required under §63.1210(c)(3):

(§63.1210(c)(4))

(1) The date, time and location of the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(i))

(2) A brief description of the purpose of the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(ii))

(3) A brief description of the source and proposed operations, including the address or a map

(e.g., a sketched or copied street map) of the source location: (§63.1210(c)(4)(iii))

(4) A statement encouraging people to contact the source at least 72 hours before the meeting if

they need special access to participate in the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(iv))

(5) A statement describing how the draft NIC can be obtained; and (§63.1210(c)(4)(v))

(6) The name, address and telephone number of a contact person for the NIC. (§63.1210(c)(4)(vi))

Progress Reports

• Demonstration: (§63.1211(b)(2))

(1) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a progress report on or before October 1,

2001 which contains information documenting that the permittee has met the requirements

of §63.1211(b)(1). This information will be used by the Administrator to determine if the

permittee has made adequate progress towards compliance with the emission standards of

this subpart. In the evaluation of adequate progress, the Administrator may consider any

delays in a source’s progress caused by the time required to obtain necessary permits from

governmental regulatory agencies when the sources have submitted timely and complete

permit applications. (§63.1211(b)(2)(i))

(2) If the permittee intends to comply with the emission standards of this subpart, but can do so

without undertaking any of the activities described in §63.1211(b)(1), the permittee must

submit a progress report documenting either: (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii))

(i) That the permittee at the time of the progress report, is in compliance with the emission

standards and operating requirements; or (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii)(A))

(ii) The steps the permittee will take to comply, without undertaking any of the activities

listed in §63.1211(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii). (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii)(B))

• Schedule: (§63.1211(b)(3))

(1) The permittee must include in the progress report a detailed schedule that lists key dates for

all projects that will bring the source into compliance with the emission standards and

operating requirements of this subpart for the time period between submission of the

progress report and the compliance date of the emission standards and operating

requirements of this subpart.(§63.1211(b)(3)(i))

(2) The schedule must contain anticipated or actual dates for the following: (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii))

(i) Bid and award dates, as necessary, for construction contracts and equipment supply

contractors; (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(A))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 42

Project No. 031-0021-023

(ii) Milestones such as ground breaking, completion of drawings and specifications,

equipment deliveries, intermediate construction completions, and testing;

(§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(B))

(iii) The dates on which applications will be submitted for or operating permits or licenses;

(§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(C))

(iv) The dates by which approvals of any permits or licenses are anticipated; and

(§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(D))

(v) The projected date by which the permittee expects to comply with the emission

standards and operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(E))

• The permittee must include a statement in the progress report that the permittee does intend

or does not intend to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this

subpart. (§63.1211(b)(4))

• Sources that do not intend to comply - If the permittee indicated in the NIC the intent not to

comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart and stop

burning hazardous waste prior to submitting a progress report, or if the permittee meets the

requirements of §63.1206(a)(2), the permittee is exempt from the requirements of

§63.1211(b)(1) through (b)(4). However, the permittee submit and include in a revised NIC the

date on which the permittee stopped burning hazardous waste and the date(s) the permittee

submitted or plan to submit RCRA closure documents. (§63.1211(b)(5)(i))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW018

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Documentation of Compliance - §63.1211(d)

Emission Limitation:

• By the compliance date, the permittee must develop and include in the operating record a

Documentation of Compliance. (§63.1211(d)(1))

• The permittee must comply with the emission standards and operating parameter limits

specified in the Documentation of Compliance. (§63.1211(d)(4))

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

The permittee shall include in the operating record, the Documentation of Compliance.

(§63.1211(d)(1))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 43

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

Documentation of Compliance

• The Documentation of Compliance must identify the applicable emission standards under this

subpart and the limits on the operating parameters under §63.1209 that will ensure

compliance with those emission standards. (§63.1211(d)(2))

• The permittee must include a signed and dated certification in the Documentation of

Compliance that: (§63.1211(d)(3))

(1) Required CEMs and CMS are installed, calibrated and continuously operating in compliance

with the requirements of this subpart; and (§63.1211(d)(3)(i))

(2) Based on an engineering evaluation prepared under the permittee’s direction or supervision

in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gathered

and evaluated the information and supporting documentation and considering at a

minimum the design, operation and maintenance characteristics of the combustor and

emissions control equipment, the types, quantities, and characteristics of feedstreams and

available emissions data: (§63.1211(d)(3)(ii))

(i) The permittee is in compliance with the emission standards of this subpart; and

(§63.1211(d)(3)(ii)(A))

(ii) The limits on the operating parameters under §63.1209 ensure compliance with the

emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1211(d)(3)(ii)(B))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW019

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Data Compression - §63.1211(e)

Emission Limitation:

The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for approval to use data

compression techniques to record data from CMS, including CEMS, on a frequency less than that

required by §63.1209. The permittee must submit the request for review and approval as part of

the comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1211(e))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 44

Project No. 031-0021-023

Data Compression:

• The permittee must record a data value at least once each ten (10)minutes. (§63.1211(e)(1))

• For each CEMS or operating parameter for which the permittee request to use data

compression techniques, the permittee must recommend: (§63.1211(e)(2))

(1) A fluctuation limit that defines the maximum permissible deviation of a new data value from

a previously generated value without requiring the permittee to revert to recording each one

(1)-minute value. (§63.1211(e)(2)(i))

(i) If the permittee exceeds a fluctuation limit, the permittee must record each one (1)-

minute value for a period of time not less than ten (10)minutes. (§63.1211(e)(2)(i)(A))

(ii) If neither the fluctuation limit nor the data compression limit are exceeded during that

period of time, the permittee may reinitiate recording data values on a frequency of at

least once each ten (10)minutes; and (§63.1211(e)(2)(i)(B))

(2) A data compression limit defined as the closest level to an operating parameter limit or

emission standard at which reduced data recording is allowed. (§63.1211(e)(2)(ii))

(i) Within this level and the operating parameter limit or emission standard, the permittee

must record each one (1)-minute average. (§63.1211(e)(2)(ii)(A))

(ii) The data compression limit should reflect a level at which the permittee is unlikely to

exceed the specific operating parameter limit or emission standard, considering its

averaging period, with the addition of a new one (1)-minute average.

(§63.1211(e)(2)(ii)(B))

Record keeping:

As required by the data compression techniques.

Reporting:

The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for approval to use data

compression techniques to record data from CMS, including CEMS, on a frequency less than that

required by §63.1209. The permittee must submit the request for review and approval as part of

the comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1211(e))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 45

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW020

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Comprehensive Performance Tests and Subsequent Testing §63.1207

Emission Limitation:

• The provisions of §63.7 apply, except as noted below: (§63.1207(a))

• Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee must conduct comprehensive performance

tests to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards provided by §63.1203, §63.1204,

and §63.1205, establish limits for the operating parameters provided by §63.1209, and

demonstrate compliance with the performance specifications for continuous monitoring

systems. (§63.1207(b)(1))

• Initial Comprehensive Performance Test – Except as provided by §63.1207(c)(2), the permittee

must commence the initial comprehensive performance test no later than six (6) months after

the compliance date. (§63.1207(c)(1))

• Data in lieu of the Initial Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee may request that

previous emissions test data serve as documentation of conformance with the emission

standards of this subpart provided that the previous testing was: (§63.1207(c)(2)(i))

(1) Initiated after March 30, 1998; (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(A))

(2) For the purpose of demonstrating emissions under a RCRA permit issuance or reissuance

proceeding under Part 270 of this Chapter; (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(B))

(3) In conformance with the requirements of paragraph §63.1207(g)(1); and (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(C))

(4) Sufficient to establish the applicable operating parameter limits under §63.1209.

(§63.1207(c)(2)(i))(D))

• The permittee must submit data in lieu of the initial comprehensive performance test in lieu of

or with the notification of performance test required under §63.1207(e). (§63.1207(c)(2)(ii))

• Frequency of Testing – The permittee must conduct testing periodically as prescribed below.

The date of commencement of the initial comprehensive performance test is the basis for

establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next

comprehensive performance test. The permittee may conduct performance testing at any time

prior to the required date. The deadline for commencing subsequent confirmatory and

comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement of the previous

comprehensive performance test. Unless the Administrator grants a time extension under

§63.1207(i), the testing must be conducted as follows: (§63.1207(d))

(1) Comprehensive Performance Testing – The permittee must commence testing no later than

sixty-one (61) months after the date of commencing the previous comprehensive

performance test. If the permittee submits data in lieu of the initial performance test, the

permittee must commence the subsequent comprehensive performance test within sixty-one

(61) months of commencing the test used to provide the data in lieu of the initial

performance test. (§63.1207(d)(1))

(2) Duration of Testing – The permittee must complete performance testing within sixty (60)

days after the date of commencement, unless the Administrator determines that a time

extension is warranted based on the documentation in writing of factors beyond your control

that prevent you from meeting the sixty (60) day deadline. (§63.1207(d)(3))

• If the permittee fails to postmark a Notification of Compliance by the specified date, the

permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately. (§63.1207(k)(1))

• Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(k)(3), the

permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or comprehensive

performance testing and only for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable

at the discretion of the Administrator). (§63.1207(k)(2))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 46

Project No. 031-0021-023

• §63.1209(j) through (p) require the permittee to establish limits on operating parameters based

on comprehensive performance testing to ensure the permittee maintains compliance with the

emission standards of this subpart. For several parameters, the permittee must establish a

limit for the parameter to ensure compliance with more than one (1) emission standard. An

example is a limit on minimum combustion chamber temperature to ensure compliance with

both the DRE standards of §63.1209(j) and the dioxin/furan standard of §63.1209(k). If the

performance tests for such standards are not performed simultaneously, the most stringent

limit for a parameter derived from independent performance tests applies. (§63.1209(i))

Notification of Compliance

• The Notification of Compliance status requirements of §63.9(h) apply, except that:

(§63.1210(d)(1))

(1) The notification is a Notification of Compliance, rather than compliance status:

(§63.1210(d)(1)(i))

(2) The notification is required for the initial comprehensive performance test and each

subsequent comprehensive and confirmatory performance test; and (§63.1210(d)(1)(ii))

(3) The permittee must postmark the notification before the close of business on the 90th day

following completion of relevant compliance demonstration activity specified in this

subpart rather than the 60th day as required by §63.9(h)(2)(ii). (§63.1210(d)(1)(iii))

• Upon postmark of the Notification of Compliance, the operating parameter limits identified in

the Notification of Compliance, as applicable, shall be complied with, the limits identified in

the Documentation of Compliance or a previous Notification of Compliance are no longer

applicable. (§63.1210(d)(2))

• The Notification of Compliance requirements of §63.1207(j) also apply. (§63.1210(d)(3))

Test Plan:

• Content of Performance Test Plan - The provisions of §63.7(c)(2)(i)-(iii) and (v) regarding the

content of the test plan apply. In addition, the permittee must include the following

information in the test plan: (§63.1207(f))

Comprehensive Performance Test Plan:

• An analysis of each feedstream, including hazardous waste, other fuels, and industrial furnace

feedstocks, as fired, that includes: (§63.1207(f)(1)(i))

(1) Heating value, levels of semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, mercury and total chlorine

(organic and inorganic); and (§63.1207(f)(1)(i)(A))

(2) Viscosity or description of the physical form of the feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(i)(B))

• For organic hazardous air pollutants established by 42 U.S.C. 7412(b)(1), excluding

caprolactam (CAS number 105602) as provided by §63.60: (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii))

(1) An identification of such organic hazardous air pollutants that are present in the feedstream,

except that the permittee need not analyze for organic hazardous air pollutants that would

reasonably not be expected to be found in the feedstream. The permittee must identify any

constituents you exclude from analysis and explain the basis for excluding them. The

permittee must conduct the feedstream analysis according to §63.1208(b)(8).;

(§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(A))

(i) The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream

concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the permittee’s

responsibility to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased,

precise and that the results are representative of the feedstream. (§63.1208(b)(8))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 47

Project No. 031-0021-023

(2) An approximate quantification of such identified organic hazardous air pollutants in the

feedstreams, within the precision produced by the analytical procedures of §63.1208(b)(8);

and (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(B))

(i) The permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8))

1. Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent

(80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

2. The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or

below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit

around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical

Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

(3) A description of blending procedures, if applicable, prior to firing the feedstream, including a

detailed analysis of the materials prior to blending and blending ratios; (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(C))

• A detailed engineering description of the hazardous waste combustor, including:

(§63.1207(f)(1)(iii))

(1) Manufacturer’s name and model number of the hazardous waste combustor;

(§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A))

(2) Type of hazardous waste combustor; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(B))

(3) Maximum design capacity in appropriate units; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(C))

(4) Description of the feed system for each feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(D))

(5) Capacity of each feed system; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(E))

(6) Description of automatic hazardous waste feed cutoff system(s); (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(F))

(7) Description of the design, operation and maintenance practices for any air pollution control

system; and (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(G))

(8) Description of the design, operation, and maintenance practices of any stack gas monitoring

and pollution control monitoring systems; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(H))

• A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedure including sampling and

monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring

frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iv))

• A detailed test schedule for each hazardous waste for which the performance test is planned,

including date(s), duration, quantity of hazardous waste to be burned, and other relevant

factors; (§63.1207(f)(1)(v))

• A detailed test protocol, including, for each hazardous waste identified, the ranges of

hazardous waste feedrate for each feed system, and, as appropriate, the feedrates of other

fuels and feedstocks, and any other relevant parameters that may affect the ability of the

hazardous waste combustor to meet the emission standards; (§63.1207(f)(1)(vi))

• A description of, and planned operating conditions for, any emission control equipment that

will be used; (§63.1207(f)(1)(vii))

• Procedures for rapidly stopping the hazardous waste feed and controlling emissions in the

event of an equipment malfunction; (§63.1207(f)(1)(viii))

• A determination of the hazardous waste residence time as required by §63.1206(b)(11);

(§63.1207(f)(1)(ix))

• If the permittee is requesting to extrapolate metal feedrate limits from comprehensive

performance test levels under §§63.1209(l)(1)(i) or 63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A): (§63.1207(f)(1)(x))

(1) A description of the extrapolation methodology and rationale for how the approach ensures

compliance with the emission standards; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(A))

(2) Documentation of the historical range of normal (i.e., other than during compliance testing)

metals feedrates for each feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(B))

(3) Documentation that the level of spiking recommended during the performance test will mask

sampling and analysis imprecision and inaccuracy to the extent that extrapolation of

feedrates and emission rates from performance test data will be as accurate and precise as if

full spiking were used; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(C))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 48

Project No. 031-0021-023

• If the permittee does not continuously monitor regulated constituents in natural gas, process

air feedstreams, and feedstreams from vapor recovery systems under §63.1209(c)(5), the

permittee must include documentation of the expected levels of regulated constituents in those

feedstreams; (§63.1207(f)(1)(xi))

• Documentation justifying the duration of system conditioning required to ensure the

combustor has achieved steady-state operations under performance test operating conditions,

as provided by §63.1207(g)(1)(iii); and (§63.1207(f)(1)(xii))

• For cement kilns with in-line raw mills, if the permittee elects to use the emissions averaging

provision of §63.1204(d), the permittee must notify the Administrator of the intent in the initial

(and subsequent) comprehensive performance test plan and provide the information required

under §63.1204(d)(ii)(B). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xiii)

• If the permittee is not required to conduct performance testing to document compliance with

the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission

standards under §63.1207(m), the permittee must include with the comprehensive

performance test plan documentation of compliance with the provisions of §63.1207(m).

(§63.1207(f)(xvi))

• If the permittee propose to use a surrogate for measuring or monitoring gas flowrate, the

permittee must document in the comprehensive performance test plan that the surrogate

adequately correlates with gas flowrate, as required by §63.1207(m)(7) and §63.1209(j)(2),

(k)(3), (m)(2)(i), (m)(5)(i) and (o)(2)(i). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xvii))

• The permittee must submit an application to request alternative monitoring under

§63.1209(g)(1) not later than with the comprehensive performance test plan, as required by

§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(A). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xviii))

• The permittee must document the temperature location measurement in the comprehensive

performance test plan, as required by §§63.1209(j)(1)(i) and 63.1209(k)(2)(i).

(§63.1207(f)(1)(xix))

• Such other information as the Administrator reasonably finds necessary to determine whether

to approve the performance test plan. (§63.1207(f)(1)(xxvi))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 49

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must calculate the hazardous waste residence time and include the calculation

in the performance test plan under §63.1207(f) and the operating record. The permittee must

also provide the hazardous waste residence time in the Documentation of Compliance under

§63.1211(d) and the Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d).

(§63.1206(b)(11))

• The permittee must conduct a minimum of three (3) runs of a performance test required under

§63.1207 to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.

(§63.1206(b)(12)(i))

• The permittee must document compliance with the emission standards based on the

arithmetic average of the emission results of each run, except that the permittee must

document compliance with the destruction and removal efficiency standard for each run of the

comprehensive performance test individually. (§63.1206(b)(12)(ii))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance – The permittee must conduct a comprehensive

performance test under the requirements of §§63.1207(f)(1) and (g)(1) to document compliance

with the affected emission standard(s) and establish operating parameter limits are required

under §63.1209, and submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance under

§§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d); and (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(B))

• The permittee must comply with the provisions of §63.7(e). Conducting performance testing

under operating conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is

consistent with the requirements of §63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under

representative operating conditions. (§63.1207(g))

Comprehensive Performance Testing:

• Operations During Testing – For the following parameters, the permittee must operate the

combustor during the performance test under normal conditions (or conditions that will result

in higher than normal emissions): (§63.1207(g)(1)(i))

(1) The permittee must feed normal (or higher) levels of chlorine during the dioxin/furan

performance test; (§63.1207(g)(1)(i)(A))

(2) The permittee must conduct the following tests when the particulate matter control device

undergoes its normal (or more frequent) cleaning cycle; the particulate matter, semivolatile

metal, and low volatile metal performance tests; and the dioxin/furan and mercury

performance tests if activated carbon injection or a carbon bed is used. (§63.1207(g)(1)(i)(C))

• Given that the permittee must establish limits for the applicable operating parameters

specified in §63.1209 based on operations during the comprehensive performance test, the

permittee may conduct testing under two (2) or more operating modes to provide operating

flexibility. (§63.1207(g)(1)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 50

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Prior to obtaining performance test data, the permittee must operate under performance test

conditions until you reach steady-state operations with respect to emissions of pollutants, the

permittee must measure during the performance test and operating parameters under

§63.1209 for which you must establish limits. During system conditioning, the permittee

must ensure that each operating parameter for which you must establish a limit is held at the

level planned for the performance test. The permittee must include documentation in the

performance test plan under §63.1207(f) justifying the duration of system conditioning.

(§63.1207(g)(1)(iii)(A)

Subsequent Testing:

• Current operating parameter limits established under §63.1209 are waived during subsequent

comprehensive performance testing under an approved test plan. (§63.1207(h)(1))

• Current operating parameter limits are also waived during pretesting prescribed in the

approved test plan prior to comprehensive performance testing for an aggregate time not to

exceed seven hundred twenty (720) hours of operation (renewable at the discretion of the

Administrator). Pretesting means: (§63.1207(h)(2))

(1) Operations when stack emissions testing for dioxin/furan, mercury, semivolatile metals, low

volatile metals, particulate matter, or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas is being performed; and

(§63.1207(h)(2)(i))

(2) Operations to reach steady-state operating conditions prior to stack emissions testing under

§63.1207(g)(1)(iii). (§63.1207(h)(2)(ii))

Failure of Performance Test:

• If the permittee determines (based on CEM recordings, results of analyses of stack samples, or

results of CMS performance evaluations) that the permittee has exceeded any emission

standard during a comprehensive performance test for a mode of operation, the permittee

must cease hazardous waste burning immediately under that mode of operation. The

permittee must make this determination within ninety (90) days following completion of the

performance test. (§63.1207(l)(1)(i))

• If the permittee has failed to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for any

mode of operation: (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii))

(1) Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(C),

the permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or

comprehensive performance testing under revised operating conditions, and only for a

maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the

Administrator), except as provided by §63.1207(l)(3); (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(A))

(2) The permittee must conduct a comprehensive performance test under revised operating

conditions following the requirements for performance testing of this section; and

(§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(B))

(3) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance subsequent to

the new comprehensive performance test. (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(C))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous

waste in the interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than

testing or pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on

operating parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission

standards of this subpart based on available information including data from the failed

performance test. The Administrator will review, modify as necessary, and approve if

warranted the interim operating requirements. An approval of interim operating requirements

will include a schedule for submitting a Notification of Compliance. (§63.1207(l)(3))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 51

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c))

(1) Intent to conduct a comprehensive performance test;

(2) CMS performance evaluation;

(3) Site-specific test plan;

(4) CMS performance evaluation plan;

(5) Public notice for the approved test and CMS performance evaluation plans;

(6) Comprehensive performance test plan results;

(7) CMS performance evaluation;

(8) Extension requests for performance testing;

(9) Approval/denial for the extension requests for performance testing;

(10) Notification of Compliance;

(11) Extension request for the Notification of Compliance; and

(12) Approval/denial for the extension request for Notification of compliance.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The provisions of §63.7(b) and (c) and §63.8(e) apply, except: (§63.1207(e)(1))

• Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee must submit to the Administrator a

notification of intent to conduct a comprehensive performance test and CMS performance

evaluation and a site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan at least one

(1) year before the performance test and performance evaluation are scheduled to begin.

(§63.1207(e)(1)(i)

(1) The Administrator will notify the permittee of approval or intent to deny approval of the

site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan within nine (9) months

after receipt of the original plan. (§63.1207(e)(1)(i)(A))

(2) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a notification of your intention to conduct

the comprehensive performance test at least sixty (60) calendar days before the test is

scheduled to begin. (§63.1207(e)(1)(i)(B))

• After the Administrator has approved the site-specifc test plan and CMS performance

evaluation test plan, the permittee must make the test plans available to the public for review.

The permittee must issue a public notice announcing the approval of the test plans and the

location where the test plans are available for review. (§63.1207(e)(2))

• After the initial comprehensive performance test, the permittee may request up to a one (1)-

year time extension for conducting a comprehensive or confirmatory performance test to

consolidate performance testing with other state or federally required emission testing, or for

other reasons deemed acceptable by the Administrator. If the Administrator grants a time

extension for a comprehensive performance test, the deadlines for commencing the next

comprehensive and confirmatory tests are based on the date that the subject comprehensive

performance test commences. (§63.1207(i))

(1) The permittee must submit in writing to the Administrator any request under §63.1207(i)

for a time extension for conducting a performance test. (§63.1207(i)(1))

(2) The permittee must include in the request for an extension for conducting a performance

test the following: (§63.1207(i)(2))

(i) A description of the reasons for requesting the time extension; (§63.1207(i)(2)(i))

(ii) The date by which the permittee will commence performance testing.

(§63.1207(i)(2)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 52

Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of approval or intention to deny

approval of your request for an extension for conducting a performance test within thirty

(30) calendar days after receipt of sufficient information to evaluate your request. The

thirty (30) day approval or denial period will begin after you have been notified in writing

that your application is complete. The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing

whether the application contains sufficient information to make a determination within

thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the original application and within thirty (30)

calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information that you submit.

(§63.1207(i)(3))

(4) When notifying the permittee that the application is not complete, the Administrator will

specify the information needed to complete the application. The Administrator will also

provide notice of opportunity for the permittee to present, in writing, within thirty (30)

calendar days after notification of the incomplete application, additional information or

arguments to the Administrator to enable further action on the application. (§63.1207(i)(4))

(5) Before denying any request for an extension for performance testing, the Administrator will

notify the permittee in writing of the Administrator’s intention to issue the denial, together

with: (§63.1207(i)(5))

(i) Notice of information and findings on which the intended denial is base; and

(§63.1207(i)(5)(i))

(ii) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present in writing, within fifteen (15) calendar

days after notification of the intended denial, additional information or arguments to

the Administrator before further action on the request. (§63.1207(i)(5)(ii))

(6) The Administrator’s final determination to deny any request for an extension will be in

writing and will set forth specific grounds upon which the denial is based. The final

determination will be made within thirty (30) calendar days after the presentation of

additional information or argument (if the application is complete), or within thirty (30) days

after the final date specified for the presentation if no presentation is made. (§63.1207(i)(6))

• Notification of Compliance – Comprehensive Performance Test – Within ninety (90) days of

completion of a comprehensive performance test, the permittee must postmark a Notification

of Compliance documenting compliance or noncompliance with the emission standards and

continuous monitoring system requirements, and identifying operating parameter limits under

§63.1209. (§63.1207(j)(1)(i))

• Notification of Compliance – Comprehensive Performance Test - Upon postmark of the

Notification of Compliance, the permittee must comply with all operating requirements

specified in the Notification of Compliance in lieu of the limits specified in the Documentation

of Compliance required under §63.1211(d). (§63.1207(j)(1)(ii))

• See §§63.7(g), 63.9(h) and 63.1210(d) for additional requirements pertaining to the Notification

of Compliance (e.g., the permittee must include results of performance tests in the Notification

of Compliance). (§63.1207(j)(3))

• Time extension – The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for a time

extension documenting that, for reasons beyond your control, the permittee may not be able to

meet the ninety (90) day deadline for submitting the Notification of Compliance after

completion of testing. The Administrator will determine whether a time extension is

warranted. (§63.1207(j)(4))

• Failure to Submit Timely Notification of Compliance – The permittee must submit to the

Administrator a Notification of compliance subsequent to a new comprehensive performance

test before resuming hazardous waste burning. (§63.1207(k)(3))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 53

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW021

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Confirmatory Performance Tests §63.1207

Emission Limitation:

• The provisions of §63.7 apply, except as noted below: (§63.1207(a))

• Confirmatory Performance Test – The permittee must conduct confirmatory performance tests

to:

(1) Demonstrate compliance with the dioxin/furan emission standard when the source

operates under normal operating conditions; and (§63.1207(b)(2)(i))

(2) Conduct a performance evaluation of continuous monitoring systems required for

compliance assurance with the dioxin/furan emission standard under §63.1209(k).

(§63.1207(b)(2)(ii))

• Frequency of Testing – The permittee must conduct testing periodically as prescribed below.

The date of commencement of the initial comprehensive performance test is the basis for

establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next

comprehensive performance test. The permittee may conduct performance testing at any time

prior to the required date. The deadline for commencing subsequent confirmatory and

comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement of the previous

comprehensive performance test. Unless the Administrator grants a time extension under

§63.1207(i), the testing must be conducted as follows: (§63.1207(d))

• Confirmatory Performance Testing – The permittee must commence confirmatory performance

testing no later than thirty-one (31) months after the date of commencing the previous

comprehensive performance test. If the permittee submits data in lieu of the initial

performance test, the permittee must commence the initial confirmatory performance test

within thirty-one (31) months of the date six (6) months after the compliance date. To ensure

that the confirmatory test is conducted approximately midway between comprehensive

performance tests, the Administrator will not approve a test plan the schedules testing within

eighteen (18) months of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test.

(§63.1207(d)(2))

• Duration of Testing – The permittee must complete performance testing within sixty (60) days

after the date of commencement, unless the Administrator determines that a time extension is

warranted based on the documentation in writing of factors beyond your control that prevent

you from meeting the sixty (60) day deadline. (§63.1207(d)(3))

• If the permittee fails to postmark a Notification of Compliance by the specified date, the

permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately. (§63.1207(k)(1))

• Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(k)(3), the

permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or comprehensive

performance testing and only for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable

at the discretion of the Administrator). (§63.1207(k)(2))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 54

Project No. 031-0021-023

Notification of Compliance

• The Notification of Compliance status requirements of §63.9(h) apply, except that:

(§63.1210(d)(1))

(1) The notification is a Notification of Compliance, rather than compliance status:

(§63.1210(d)(1)(i))

(2) The notification is required for the initial comprehensive performance test and each

subsequent comprehensive and confirmatory performance test; and (§63.1210(d)(1)(ii))

(3) The permittee must postmark the notification before the close of business on the 90th day

following completion of relevant compliance demonstration activity specified in this subpart

rather than the 60th day as required by §63.9(h)(2)(ii). (§63.1210(d)(1)(iii))

• Upon postmark of the Notification of Compliance, the operating parameter limits identified in

the Notification of Compliance, as applicable, shall be complied with, the limits identified in

the Documentation of Compliance or a previous Notification of Compliance are no longer

applicable. (§63.1210(d)(2))

• The Notification of Compliance requirements of §63.1207(j) also apply. (§63.1210(d)(3))

Test Plan:

• Content of Performance Test Plan - The provisions of §63.7(c)(2)(i)-(iii) and (v) regarding the

content of the test plan apply. In addition, the permittee must include the following

information in the test plan: (§63.1207(f))

Confirmatory Test Plan:

• A description of the normal hydrocarbon or carbon monoxide operating levels, as specified in

§63.1207(g)(2)(i), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined;

(§63.1207(f)(2)(i))

• A description of the normal applicable operating parameter levels, as specified in

§63.1207(g)(2)(ii), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined;

(§63.1207(f)(2)(ii))

• A description of the normal chlorine operating levels, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(iii), and an

explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(iii))

• If the permittee uses carbon injection or a carbon bed, a description of the normal cleaning

cycle of the particulate matter control device, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(iv), and an

explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(iv))

• A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedures including sampling and

monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring

frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis; (§63.1207(f)(2)(v))

• A detailed test schedule for each hazardous waste for which the performance test is planned,

including date(s), duration, quantity of hazardous waste to be burned, and other relevant

factors; (§63.1207(f)(2)(vi))

• A detailed test protocol, including, for each hazardous waste identified, the ranges of

hazardous waste feedrate for each feed system, and, as appropriate, the feedrates of other

fuels and feedstocks, and any other relevant parameters that may affect the ability of the

hazardous waste combustor to meet the dioxin/furan emission standard; (§63.1207(f)(2)(vii)

• A description of, and planned operating conditions for, any emission control equipment that

will be used; (§63.1207(f)(2)(viii))

• Procedures for rapidly stopping the hazardous waste feed and controlling emissions in the

event of an equipment malfunction; and (§63.1207(f)(2)(ix))

• Such other information as the Administrator reasonably finds necessary to determine whether

to approve the confirmatory test plan. (§63.1207(f)(2)(x))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 55

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee must calculate the hazardous waste residence time and include the calculation

in the performance test plan under §63.1207(f) and the operating record. The permittee must

also provide the hazardous waste residence time in the Documentation of Compliance under

§63.1211(d) and the Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d).

(§63.1206(b)(11))

• The permittee must conduct a minimum of three (3) runs of a performance test required under

§63.1207 to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.

(§63.1206(b)(12)(i))

• The permittee must document compliance with the emission standards based on the

arithmetic average of the emission results of each run, except that the permittee must

document compliance with the destruction and removal efficiency standard for each run of the

comprehensive performance test individually. (§63.1206(b)(12)(ii))

• The permittee must comply with the provisions of §63.7(e). Conducting performance testing

under operating conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is

consistent with the requirements of §63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under

representative operating conditions. (§63.1207(g))

Confirmatory Performance Testing:

• The permittee must conduct confirmatory performance testing for dioxin/furan under normal

operating conditions for the following parameters: (§63.1207(g)(2))

(1) Carbon monoxide (or hydrocarbon) CEMS emission levels must be within the range of the

average value to the maximum value allowed. The average value is defined as the sum of the

hourly rolling average values recorded (each minute) over the previous twelve (12) months

divided by the number of rolling averages recorded during that time; (§63.1207(g)(2)(i))

(2) Each operating limit (specified in §63.1209) established to maintain compliance with the

dioxin/furan emission standard must be held within the range of the average value over the

previous twelve (12) months and the maximum or minimum, as appropriate, that is allowed.

The average value is defined as the sum of the rolling average values recorded over the

previous twelve (12) months divided by the number of rolling average recorded during that

time. The average value must not include calibration data, malfunction data, and data

obtained when not burning hazardous waste; (§63.1207(g)(2)(ii))

(3) The permittee must feed chlorine at normal feedrates or greater; and (§63.1207(g)(2)(iii))

(4) If the combustor is equipped with carbon injection or carbon bed, normal cleaning cycle of

the particulate matter control device. (§63.1207(g)(2)(iv))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 56

Project No. 031-0021-023

Failure of Performance Test:

• If the permittee determines (based on CEM recordings, results of analyses of stack samples, or

results of CMS performance evaluations) that the permittee has failed the dioxin/furan

emission standard during a confirmatory performance test, the permittee must cease

hazardous waste burning immediately. The permittee must make this determination within

ninety (90) days following completion of the performance test. To burn hazardous waste in the

future: (§63.1207(l)(2))

(1) The permittee must submit to the Administrator for review and approval a test plan to

conduct a comprehensive performance test to identify revised limits on the applicable

dioxin/furan operating parameters specified in §63.1209(k); (§63.1207(l)(2)(i))

(2) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance with the

dioxin/furan emission standard under the provisions of §63.1207(j), (k) and (l). The

permittee must include in the Notification of Compliance the revised limits on the applicable

dioxin/furan operating parameters specified in §63.1209(k); and (§63.1207(l)(2)(ii))

(3) Until the Notification of Compliance is submitted, the permittee must not burn hazardous

waste except for purposes of pretesting or confirmatory performance testing, and for a

maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the

Administrator), except as provided by §63.1207(l)(3); (§63.1207(l)(2)(iii))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous

waste in the interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than

testing or pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on

operating parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission

standards of this subpart based on available information including data from the failed

performance test. The Administrator will review, modify as necessary, and approve if

warranted the interim operating requirements. An approval of interim operating requirements

will include a schedule for submitting a Notification of Compliance. (§63.1207(l)(3))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c))

(1) Intent to conduct a confirmatory performance test;

(2) CMS performance evaluation;

(3) Site-specific test plan;

(4) CMS performance evaluation plan;

(5) Public notice for the approved test and CMS performance evaluation plans;

(6) Confirmatory performance test plan results;

(7) CMS performance evaluation;

(8) Extension requests for performance testing;

(9) Approval/denial for the extension requests for performance testing;

(10) Notification of Compliance;

(11) Extension request for the Notification of Compliance; and

(12) Approval/denial for the extension request for Notification of compliance.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 57

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The provisions of §63.7(b) and (c) and §63.8(e) apply, except: (§63.1207(e)(1))

• Confirmatory Performance Test – The permittee must submit to the Administrator a

notification of intent to conduct a confirmatory performance test and CMS performance

evaluation and site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan at least sixty (60)

calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin. The Administrator will notify

the permittee of approval or intent to deny approval of the site-specific test plan and CMS

performance evaluation test plan within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the original

test plans. (§63.1207(e)(1)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 58

Project No. 031-0021-023

• After the Administrator has approved the site-specific test plan and CMS performance

evaluation test plan, the permittee must make the test plans available to the public for review.

The permittee must issue a public notice announcing the approval of the test plans and the

location where the test plans are available for review. (§63.1207(e)(2))

• After the initial comprehensive performance test, the permittee may request up to a one (1)-

year time extension for conducting a comprehensive or confirmatory performance test to

consolidate performance testing with other state or federally required emission testing, or for

other reasons deemed acceptable by the Administrator. If the Administrator grants a time

extension for a comprehensive performance test, the deadlines for commencing the next

comprehensive and confirmatory tests are based on the date that the subject comprehensive

performance test commences. (§63.1207(i))

(1) The permittee must submit in writing to the Administrator any request under §63.1207(i) for

a time extension for conducting a performance test. (§63.1207(i)(1))

(2) The permittee must include in the request for an extension for conducting a performance

test the following: (§63.1207(i)(2))

(i) A description of the reasons for requesting the time extension; (§63.1207(i)(2)(i))

(ii) The date by which the permittee will commence performance testing.

(§63.1207(i)(2)(ii))

(3) The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of approval or intention to deny

approval of your request for an extension for conducting a performance test within thirty

(30) calendar days after receipt of sufficient information to evaluate your request. The thirty

(30) day approval or denial period will begin after you have been notified in writing that your

application is complete. The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing whether the

application contains sufficient information to make a determination within thirty (30)

calendar days after receipt of the original application and within thirty (30) calendar days

after receipt of any supplementary information that you submit. (§63.1207(i)(3))

(4) When notifying the permittee that the application is not complete, the Administrator will

specify the information needed to complete the application. The Administrator will also

provide notice of opportunity for the permittee to present, in writing, within thirty (30)

calendar days after notification of the incomplete application, additional information or

arguments to the Administrator to enable further action on the application. (§63.1207(i)(4))

(5) Before denying any request for an extension for performance testing, the Administrator will

notify the permittee in writing of the Administrator’s intention to issue the denial, together

with: (§63.1207(i)(5))

(i) Notice of information and findings on which the intended denial is base; and

(§63.1207(i)(5)(i))

(ii) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present in writing, within fifteen (15) calendar

days after notification of the intended denial, additional information or arguments to

the Administrator before further action on the request. (§63.1207(i)(5)(ii))

(6) The Administrator’s final determination to deny any request for an extension will be in

writing and will set forth specific grounds upon which the denial is based. The final

determination will be made within thirty (30) calendar days after the presentation of

additional information or argument (if the application is complete), or within thirty (30) days

after the final date specified for the presentation if no presentation is made. (§63.1207(i)(6))

• Notification of Compliance – Confirmatory Performance Test - Except as provided by

§63.1207(j)(4), within ninety (90) days of completion of a confirmatory performance test, the

permittee must postmark a Notification of Compliance documenting compliance or

noncompliance with the applicable dioxin/furan emission standard. (§63.1207(j)(2))

• See §§63.7(g), 63.9(h) and 63.1210(d) for additional requirements pertaining to the Notification

of Compliance (e.g., the permittee must include results of performance tests in the Notification

of Compliance). (§63.1207(j)(3))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 59

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Time extension – The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for a time

extension documenting that, for reasons beyond your control, the permittee may not be able to

meet the ninety (90) day deadline for submitting the Notification of Compliance after

completion of testing. The Administrator will determine whether a time extension is

warranted. (§63.1207(j)(4))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW022

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Waiver of Performance Test §63.1207

Emission Limitation:

• The waiver provision of §63.1207(m) applies in addition to the provisions of §63.7(h).

(§63.1207(m)(1))

• The permittee is not required to conduct performance tests to document compliance with the

mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission

standards under the conditions specified below. The permittee is deemed to be in compliance

with an emission standard if the twelve (12)-hour rolling average maximum theoretical

emission concentration (MTEC) determined as specified below does not exceed the emission

standard: (§63.1207(m)(2))

(1) Determine the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, or total chlorine

and chloride from all feedstreams; (§63.1207(m)(2)(i))

(2) Determine the stack gas flowrate; and (§63.1207(m)(2)(ii))

(3) Calculate a MTEC for each standard assuming all mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile

metals, or total chlorine (organic and inorganic) from all feedstreams is emitted;

(§63.1207(m)(2)(iii))

Monitoring:

• To document compliance with this provision, the permittee must: (§63.1207(m)(3))

(1) Monitor and record the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and

total chlorine and chloride from all feedstreams according to §63.1209(c); (§63.1207(m)(3)(i))

(2) Monitor with a CMS and record in the operating record the gas flowrate (either directly or by

monitoring a surrogate parameter that you have correlated to gas flowrate);

(§63.1207(m)(3)(ii))

(3) Continuously calculate and record in the operating record the MTEC under the procedures

of §63.1207(m)(2); and (§63.1207(m)(3)(iii))

(4) Interlock the MTEC calculated in §63.1207(m)(2)(iii) to the AWFCO system to stop hazardous

waste burning when the MTEC exceeds the emission standard. (§63.1207(m)(3)(iv))

• In lieu of the requirement in §63.1207(m)(3)(iii) and (iv), the permittee may: (§63.1207(m)(4))

(1) Identify in the notification of compliance a minimum gas flowrate limit and a maximum

feedrate limit of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and/or total chlorine and

chloride from all feedstreams that ensures the MTEC as calculated in §63.1207(m)(2)(iii) is

below the applicable emission standard; and (§63.1207(m)(4)(i))

(2) Interlock the minimum gas flowrate limit and maximum feedrate limit in §63.1207(m)(3)(iv)

to the AWFCO system to stop hazardous waste burning when the gas flowrate or mercury,

semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and/or total chlorine and chloride feedrate exceeds

the limit in §63.1207(m)(4)(i). (§63.1207(m)(4)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 60

Project No. 031-0021-023

• When the permittee determines the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile

metals or total chlorine and chloride for purposes of this provision, except as provided by

§63.1207(m)(6), the permittee must assume that the analyte is present at the full detection

limit when the feedstream analysis determines that the analyte is not detected in the

feedstream. (§63.1207(m)(5))

• Owners and operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns may assume that mercury is

present in raw material at half the detection limit when the raw material feedstream analysis

determines that mercury is not detected. (§63.1207(m)(6))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in

conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the

manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and

calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 61

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall specify the method used for determining compliance with the mercury,

semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards.

• If the permittee complies with the requirements under §63.1207(m), the permittee shall

maintain records of:

(1) The feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals and total chlorine and

chloride from all feedstreams;

(2) The gas flowrate (either directly or by monitoring a surrogate parameter) in the operating

record;

(3) The MTEC in the operating record; and

(4) When the AWFCO system is not burning hazardous waste due to an MTEC exceedance or a

gas flowrate exceedance.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

system.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee must state in the site-specific test plan that the permittee submits for review

and approval under §63.1207(e) that the permittee intends to comply with the provisions of

this paragraph. The permittee must include in the test plan documentation that any

surrogate that is proposed for gas flowrate adequately correlates with the gas flowrate.

(§63.1207(m)(7))

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW005.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 62

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW023

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Feedrate Limits for Nondetectable Constituents - §63.1207(n)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must establish separate semivolatile metal, low volatile metal, mercury, and

total chlorine (organic and inorganic) and/or ash feedrate limits for each feedstream for which

the comprehensive performance test feedstream analysis determines that these constituents

are not present at detectable levels. (§63.1207(n)(1))

• The permittee must define the feedrate limits established under §63.1207(n)(1) as nondetect at

the full detection limit achieved during the performance test. (§63.1207(n)(2))

• Prior to feeding the material, the permittee must obtain an analysis of each feedstream that is

sufficient to document compliance with the applicable feedrate limits provided by this section.

(§63.1209(c)(1))

• The permittee must develop and implement a feedstream analysis plan and record it in the

operating record. The plan must specify at a minimum: (§63.1209(c)(2))

(1) The parameters for which the permittee will analyze each feedstream to ensure compliance

with the operating parameter limits; (§63.1209(c)(2)(i))

(2) Whether the permittee will obtain the analysis by performing sampling and analysis or by

other methods, such as using analytical information obtained from others or using other

published or documented data or information; (§63.1209(c)(2)(ii))

(3) How the permittee will use the analysis to document compliance with applicable feedrate

limits (e.g., if the permittee blends hazardous wastes and obtains analyses of the waste prior

to blending but not of the blended, as-fired, waste, the plan must describe how the permittee

will determine the pertinent parameters of the blended waste); (§63.1209(c)(2)(iii))

(4) The test methods which the permittee will use to obtain the analyses; (§63.1209(c)(2)(iv))

(5) The sampling method which the permittee will use to obtain a representative sample of each

feedstream to be analyzed using sampling methods described in Appendix I, Part 26, of

Chapter 40, or an equivalent method; and (§63.1209(c)(2)(v))

(6) The frequency with which the permittee will review or repeat the initial analysis of the

feedstream to ensure that the analysis is accurate and up to date. (§63.1209(c)(2)(vi))

• The permittee is not required to monitor levels of metals or chlorine in the following

feedstreams to document compliance with the feedrate limits provided that the permittee

document in the comprehensive performance test plan the expected levels of the constituent in

the feedstream and account for those assumed feedrate levels in documenting compliance with

feedrate limits: natural gas, process air and feedstreams from vapor recovery systems.

(§63.1209(c)(5))

• The requirements of §§63.8(d) (Quality control program) and (e) (Performance evaluation of

continuous monitoring systems) apply, except that the permittee must conduct performance

evaluations of components of the CMS under the frequency and procedures (for example,

submittal of performance evaluation test plan for review and approval) applicable to

performance tests as provided by §63.1207. (§63.1209(d)(1))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 63

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee will not be deemed to be in violation of the feedrate limit established in

§63.1207(n)(2) when detectable levels of the constituent are measured, whether at levels above

or below the full detection limit achieved during the performance test, provide that:

(§63.1207(n)(3))

(1) The total feedrate for that constituent, including the detectable levels in the feedstream

which is limited to nondetect levels is below the feedrate limit for that constituent; or

(§63.1207(n)(3)(i))

(2) Except for ash, the maximum theoretical emission concentration (MTEC) for the

constituent (i.e., semivolatile metal, low volatile metal, mercury, and/or hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas) calculated according to §63.1207(m), and considering the contribution

from all feedstreams including the detectable levels in the feedstream which is limited to

nondetect levels, is below the emission standard in §§63.1203, 63.1204 and 63.1205.

(§63.1207(n)(3)(ii))

• To comply with the applicable feedrate limits, the permittee must monitor and record feedrates

as follows: (§63.1209(c)(4))

(1) Determine and record the value of the parameter for each feedstream by sampling and

analysis or other method; (§63.1209(c)(4)(i))

(2) Determine and record the mass or volume flowrate of each feedstream by a CMS. If the

permittee determines flowrate of a feedstream by volume, the permittee must determine

and record the density of the feedstream by sampling and analysis (unless the permittee

reports the constituent concentration in units of weight per unit volume (e.g., mg/l)); and

(§63.1209(c)(4)(ii))

(3) Calculate and record the mass feedrate of the parameter per unit time. (§63.1209(c)(4)(iii))

• Conduct of Monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

• The requirements of §63.1211(d), that requires CMSs to be installed, calibrated and

operational on the compliance date, shall be complied with instead §63.8(c)(3); (§63.1209(f)(1))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in

conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the

manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and

calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 64

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must no

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the feedstream analysis plan on site at all times and

maintain a copy in the operating record. (§63.1209(c)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the value of the parameter for each feedstream by

sampling and analysis or other method; (§63.1209(c)(4)(i))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the mass or volume flowrate of each feedstream by a

CMS. If the permittee determines flowrate of a feedstream by volume, the permittee must

determine and record the density of the feedstream by sampling and analysis (unless the

permittee reports the constituent concentration in units of weight per unit volume (e.g., mg/l);

(§63.1209(c)(4)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the mass feedrate of the parameter per unit time;

(§63.1209(c)(4)(iii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

system;

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the feedstream analysis plan to the Administrator for review and

approval, if requested. (§63.1209(c)(3))

• The permittee shall place the feedrate limits in the Title V Operating Permit.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW014.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 65

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW024

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Alternate Monitoring Requirements Other than Continuous Emissions

Monitoring Systems (CEMS) - §63.1209(g)

Emission Limitation:

• Requests to use alternative methods. (§63.1209(g)(1))

(1) The permittee may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternative

monitoring requirements to document compliance with the emission standards of this

subpart. For requests to use additional CEMS, however, the permittee must use

§63.1209(a)(5) and §63.8(f). (§63.1209(g)(1)(i))

(i) The Administrator will not approve averaging periods for operating parameter limits

longer than specified unless the permittee documents using data or information that

the longer averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved

during the comprehensive performance test over any increment of time equivalent to

the time required to conduct three (3) runs of the performance test.

(§63.1209(g)(1)(i)(A))

(ii) If the Administrator approves the application to use an alternative monitoring

requirement, the permittee must continue to use that alternative monitoring

requirement until the permittee receives approval under §63.1209(g)(1) to use another

monitoring requirement. (§63.1209(g)(1)(i)(B))

(2) The permittee may submit an application to waive an operating parameter limit based on

documentation that neither that operating parameter limit nor an alternative operating

parameter limit is needed to ensure compliance with the emission standards of this

subpart. (§63.1209(g)(1)(ii))

(3) The permittee must comply with the procedures for applications submitted under

§63.1209(g)(1)(i) and (ii): (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii))

• The Administrator may determine on a case-by-case basis at any time (e.g., during review of

the comprehensive performance test plan, during compliance certification review) that the

permittee may need to limit additional or alternative operating parameters (e.g., opacity in

addition to or in lieu of operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control device) or

that alternative approaches to establish limits on operating parameters may be necessary to

document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1209(g)(2))

Monitoring:

As required by the alternative monitoring request.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the alternative monitoring application.

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the alternative monitoring approval or denial.

• As required by the alternative monitoring request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 66

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the application to the Administrator not later than the

comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(A)

• The permittee must include the following in the application: (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B))

(1) Data or information justifying the request for an alternative monitoring requirement (or for a

waiver of an operating parameter limit), such as the technical or economic infeasibility or the

impracticality of using the required approach; (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(1))

(2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating

parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach/technique (e.g., type of detector,

monitoring location), the averaging period for the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated;

and (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(2))

(3) Data of information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide

equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard, or that it

is the monitoring requirement that best assures compliance with the standard and that is

technically and economically practicable. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(3))

• The Administrator will notify the permittee of approval or intention to deny approval of the

request within ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of the original request and within sixty

(60) calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information the permittee submits. The

Administrator will not approve an alternative monitoring request unless the alternative

monitoring requirement provides equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the

relevant emission standard, or is the monitoring requirement that best assures compliance

with the standard and that is technically and economically practicable. Before disapproving

any request, the Administrator will notify the permittee of the Administrator’s intention to

disapprove the request together with: (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C))

(1) Notice of the information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based; and

(§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C)(1))

(2) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present additional information to the Administrator

before final action on the request. At the time the Administrator notifies the permittee of

intention to disapprove the request, the Administrator will specify how much time the

permittee will have after being notified of the intended disapproval to submit the additional

information. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C)(2))

• The permittee is responsible for ensuring that you submit any supplementary and additional

information supporting your application in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to

consider the application during review of the comprehensive performance test plan. Neither

the permittee’s submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or

disapprove the application, relieves the permittee of the responsibility to comply with the

provisions of this subpart. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(D))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW025

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Alternate Standards for Existing or New Hazardous Waste Burning Cement

Kilns using MACT - §63.1206(b)(10)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 67

Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to recommend alternative semivolatile metal, low

volatile metal, mercury or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards if:

(§63.1206(b)(10)(i))

(1) The permittee cannot achieve one (1) or more of these standards while using MACT because

of the raw material contribution to emissions of the regulated metals or hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas; or (§63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A))

(2) The permittee determines that mercury is not present at detectable levels in the raw

material. (§63.1206(b)(10)(i)(B))

• The alternative standard that the permittee recommends under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) may be

an operating requirement, such as a hazardous waste feedrate limitation for metals and/or

chlorine, and/or an emission limitation. (§63.1206(b)(10)(ii))

• The alternative standard must include a requirement to use MACT, or better, applicable to the

standard for which the source is seeking relief, as defined in §63.1206(b)(10)(viii) and (ix).

(§63.1206(b)(10)(iii))

• The permittee must not operate pursuant to the recommended alternative standards in lieu of

emission standards specified in §63.1204(a) and (b): (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii))

(1) Unless the Administrator approves the provisions of the alternative standard petition request

or establishes other alternative standards; and (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii)(A))

(2) Until the permittee submits a revised Notification of Compliance that incorporates the

revised standards. (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii)(B))

Monitoring:

As specified in the Administrator approval.

Record keeping:

As specified in the Administrator approval.

Reporting:

Alternative Standard Petition

• The alternative standard petition the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) must

include data or information documenting that raw material contributions to emissions of the

regulated metals or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas prevents the permittee from complying with

the emission standard even though the source is using MACT, as defined in

§63.1206(b)(10)(viii) and (ix), for the standard for which the permittee is seeking relief.

(§63.1206(b)(10)(iv)(A))

• Alternate standard petitions that the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(B) must

include data or information documenting that mercury is not present at detectable levels in

raw materials. (§63.1206(b)(10)(iv)(B))

• The permittee must include data or information with semivolatile metal and low volatility

metal alternative standard petitions that the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A)

documenting that increased chlorine feedrates associated with the burning of hazardous

waste, when compared to non-hazardous waste operations, do not significantly increase metal

emissions attributable to raw materials. (§63.1206(b)(10)(v))

• The permittee must included data or information with semi-volatile metal, low volatile metal

and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas alternative standard petitions that the permittee submits

under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) documenting that semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and

hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emissions attributable to the hazardous waste only will not

exceed the emission standards in §63.1204(a) and (b). (§63.1206(b)(10)(vi))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 68

Project No. 031-0021-023

III. Emission Unit Specific Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR)

for the full text of the applicable requirements.

EU0010 through EU0040

EU0010 - Screen (A-2101)

EU0020 - Screen (A-2201)

EU0030 – Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801)

EU0040 – Transfer Belt (A-3802)

General Description: Screen (A-2101)

Manufacturer/Model #: Simplicity Ser. #2820-11014AX-3808

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM08A (1999)

General Description: Screen (A-2201)

Manufacturer/Model #: Simplicity Ser. #1820-11014AX-3808

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM08B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801)

Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel Mfg. Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM09 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (A-3802)

Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel Mfg. Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0010-001 through EU0040-001

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO

Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any transfer point on

belt conveyors or from any other affected facility any fugitive emissions which exhibit greater

than ten percent (10%) opacity. (§60.672(b))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Test Methods and Procedures:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 69

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.675(b)(2))

• When determining compliance with the fugitive emissions standard described under

§60.672(b), the duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from three (3) hours

(thirty (30) six-(6) minute averages) to one (1) hour (ten (10) six (6) minute averages) only if the

following conditions apply: (§60.675(b)(3))

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity; and

(§60.675(b)(3)(i))

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the one-(1) hour

period. (§60.675(b)(3)(ii))

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0050

EU0050 – Secondary Crusher (A-3800)

General Description: Secondary Crusher (A-3800)

Manufacturer/Model #: Universal - 130/115
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 70

Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM10 (1999)

Permit Condition EU0050-001

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO

Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any crusher, at

which a capture system is not used, fugitive emissions which exhibit greater than fifteen

percent (15%) opacity. (§60.672(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Test Methods and Procedures:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.675(b)(2))

• When determining compliance with the fugitive emissions standard described under

§60.672(c), the duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from three (3) hours

(thirty (30) six-(6) minute averages) to one (1) hour (ten (10) six (6) minute averages) only if the

following conditions apply: (§60.675(b)(4))

(1) There are no individual readings greater than fifteen percent (15%) opacity; and

(§60.675(b)(4)(i))

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of fifteen percent (15%) for the one-(1) hour

period. (§60.675(b)(4)(ii))

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 71

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 72

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0060 through EU0240

EU0060 – Hopper (W-4600)

EU0070 – Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary

EU0080 – Transfer Belt (W-4900)

EU0090 – Transfer Belt (W-5000)

EU0100 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0110 – Hopper (W-5301)

EU0120 – Transfer Belt (W-5700)

EU0130 – Transfer Belt (W-3800)

EU0140 – Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000)

EU0150 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone)

EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)

EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli)

EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale)

EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum)

EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone)

EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash)

EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash)

EU0230 – Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202)

EU0240 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

General Description: Hopper (W-4600)

Manufacturer/Model #: Jeffrey Manufacturing, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM17 (1999)

General Description: Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) - Primary

Manufacturer/Model #: Jeffrey Manufacruitng, 42 x 50 Single Direction Mud Hole

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-4900)

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM19 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5000)

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM19 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5000)

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM21 (1999)

General Description: Hopper (W-5301)

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM25(1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5700)

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM26(1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 73

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-3800)

Process Enclosed (Tunnel)

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM27(1999)

CD-RM27 (1999)

General Description: Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000)

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM28(1999)

CD-RM28 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501; W-4502; W-4503; W-4504;

W-4511; and W-4512

Dust Collector W-5800

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM29 (1999)

CD-RM29 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505; and W-4506

Dust Collector W-6000

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM30 (1999)

CD-RM30 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202)

Dust Collector R-3223

Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick Scale Mfg. Co., 451

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM31 (1999)

CD-RM31 (1999)

General Description: Barge Unloading to Trucks

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH01 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0060-001 through EU0240-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63 lbs/hr from EU0060 through EU0090;

• 61 lbs/hr from EU0100 and EU0240;

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0110 through EU0200;

• 58.5 lbs/hr from EU0210 through EU0220;

• 25.2 lbs/hr from EU0230.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 74

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0150-002 through EU0220-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material

storage any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• None

Record keeping:

• None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 75

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0150-003 through EU0220-003;

EU0230-002 and EU0240-002

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin shall not cause to be discharged any

gases from raw material storage bin which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%).

(§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part

60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw

material storage bin is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to

occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be

used to determine whether the raw material storage bin is in initial compliance with the

standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30)

six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 76

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 77

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0250 through EU0340

EU0250-Hopper W-7100

EU0260 – Feeder Belt W-9800

EU0270 – Transfer Belt W-9700

EU0280 – Screen W-9701

EU0290 – Transfer Belt W-7900

EU0300 – Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106

EU0310 – Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal)

EU0320 – Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)

EU0330 – Transfer Belt C-1000

EU0340 – Transfer Belt C-2400

General Description: Hopper W-7100

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineering, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH04A (1999)

General Description: Feeder Belt W-9800

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch System, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH04B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-9700

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 78

Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH05 (1999)

General Description: Screen W-9701

Manufacturer/Model #: FMC Corp., CS 148

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH07 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-7900

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH07 (1999)

General Description: Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08A (1999)

General Description: Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal)

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08B (1999)

General Description: Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt C-1000

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH09 (1999)

CD-CH9

General Description: Transfer Belt C-2400

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH09 (1999)

CD-CH9
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 79

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0250-001 through EU0340-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU0250 through EU0280;

• 63 lbs/hr form EU0290 through EU0320;

• 30.5 lbs/hr from EU0330;

• 19.2 lbs/hr from EU0340.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0250-002 through EU0340-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y

Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any coal

processing and conveying equipment, coal storage system, or coal transfer and loading system

processing coal, gases which exhibit twenty percent (20%) opacity or greater. (§60.252(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 80

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.254(b)(2))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 81

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0250-003 through EU0270-003;

and EU0290-003 through EU0340-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be

discharged any gases from the conveying system transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess

of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Performance Testing:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 82

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin

and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with

Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under

the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin and conveying system transfer

point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw material storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in

initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be

three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9

performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through

§63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 83

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 84

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0350 through EU0360

EU0350 – RSP Mill System C-2500

EU0360 – Kiln Mill System C-1100

General Description: RSP Mill C-2500

Solid Fuel Feed Bin C-1700 (Coal) (Process Enclosed)

Cyclone

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #803 RS

Milltronics Limited, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10A1 (1999)

CH11A (1999)

CD-CH11 (1999)

General Description: Kiln Mill C-1100

Solid Fuel Feed Bin C-3300 (Coal) (Process Enclosed)

Cyclone

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #663

Milltronics Limited, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10A2 (1999)

CH11B (1999)

CD-CH11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0350-001 and EU0360-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 30.5 lbs/hr from EU0350 and EU0360.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 85

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0350-002 through EU0360-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y

Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operators shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any thermal

dryer gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.070 g/dscm (0.031 gr/dscf).

(§60.252(a)(1))

• The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any thermal

dryer gases which exhibit twenty percent (20%) opacity or greater. (§60.252(a)(2))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of any thermal dryer shall install, calibrate maintain and continuously

operate monitoring devices as follows: (§60.253(a))

• A monitoring device for the measurement of the temperature of the gas stream at the exit of

the thermal dryer on a continuous basis. The monitoring device is to be certified by the

manufacturer to be accurate within ±3° Fahrenheit. (§60.253(a)(1))

• All monitoring devices are to be recalibrated annually in accordance with procedures under

§60.13(b). (§60.253(b))

• Method 5 shall be used to determine the particulate matter concentration. The sampling time

and sample volume for each run shall be at least sixty (60) minutes and 0.85 dscm (thirty (30)

dscf). Sampling shall begin no less than 30 minutes after startup and shall terminate before

shutdown procedures begin. (§60.254(b)(1))

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.254(b)(2))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 86

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous temperature recordings.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration of the continuous temperature

monitoring device.

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit or particulate matter limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction

which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0350-003 and EU0360-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material

dryer any gases which exhibit opacity greater than ten percent (10%). (§63.1346(a))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Performance Testing:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 87

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material dryer opacity

limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The

performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material

dryer is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw material dryer is in initial compliance with the standard. The

duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute

averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-

(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 88

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0370 through EU0380

EU0370 – Process Heater C-1400

EU0380 – Process Heater C-2800

General Description: Process Heater C-1400

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #7

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10B (1999)

General Description: Process Heater C-2800

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #D-8

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10B (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0370-001 and EU0380-001

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 89

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per

million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35

mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more

than 0.5% weight sulfur.

Monitoring:

None

Record keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR

10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

EU0390 through EU0490

EU0390 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0400 – Tuck Loading

EU0410 – Hopper Loading KB-7000

EU0420 – Transfer Belt KB-7200

EU0430 – Transfer Belt KB-7400

EU0440 – Elevator KB-7500

EU0450 – Transfer Belt KB-7600

EU0460 – Transfer Belt KB-7700

EU0470 – Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801

EU0480 – Transfer Belt R-3803

EU0490 – Transfer Belt R-3700

General Description: Barge Unloading to Trucks

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH01 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH01 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Loading KB-7000

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7200

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7400
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 90

Project No. 031-0021-023

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04B (1999)

General Description: Elevator KB-7500

Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel MFg. Co., Modified Rexnard #1612-01

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04C (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7600

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH05 (1999)

CD-TH5 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7700

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): TH05 (1999)

CD-TH5 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01 (1999)

CD-KP1 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt R-3803

Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt R-3700

Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01A (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0390-001 through EU0490-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU0390 and EU0400;

• 8.56 lbs/hr from EU0410 through EU0460;

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0470 through EU0490.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 91

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0390-002 through EU0490-002

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be

discharged any gases from bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of

ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the bulk loading or unloading

system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40

CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when

the bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level

reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during

the test period shall be used to determine whether the bulk loading or unloading system is in

initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be

three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9

performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through

§63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 92

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 93

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0470-003 through EU0490-003

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the conveyor

transfer point any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 94

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0500 through EU0510

EU0500 – Kiln KB-5100

EU0510 – Raw Mill System R-4300

General Description: Kiln KB-5100

Clinker Cooler (KC-0200)

Cyclone Separator

Dust Collector R-4800

Manufacturer/Model #: A-C S/N C04553

Dust Collector (Buell-56RM-12)

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02A (1999)

KP02D (1999)

CD-KP2A (1999)

CD-KP2 (1999)

General Description: Raw Mill System R-4300

Cyclone Separator

Dust Collector R-4800

Manufacturer/Model #: C.E. Raymond 16380R S/N 77098

Dust Collector (Buell-56RM-12)

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02C (1999)

CD-KP2 (1999)

CD-KP2 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0500-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 95

Project No. 031-0021-023

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 61.6 lbs/hr from EU0500 and EU0510.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the kiln is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the kiln is operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any kiln any

gases which: (§60.62(a))

(1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln

(0.30 lb per ton). (§60.62(a)(1))

(2) Exhibit greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity. (§60.62(a)(2))

• This emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall control emissions from the raw mill separator using a baghouse as

specified in the permit application. The baghouse shall be operated and maintained in

accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The baghouse shall be equipped with a

gauge or meter, which indicates the pressure drop across the control device. These gauges or

meters shall be located such that the DNR employees may easily observe them. Replacement

filters for the baghouse shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers

appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e. temperature limits, acidic and

alkali resistance and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across the baghouse at

least once every twenty-four (24) hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained

within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special

Condition #10)

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))

• Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with

§60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions

discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall

be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If

there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install,

calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack

in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))

• For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported

are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed

by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.

• The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the baghouse which shall

include the following (Special Condition #11):

(1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and

corrective actions; and

(2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements, etc.

Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 96

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the permit condition.

• Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall

submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must

comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such

reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a))

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0510-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 61.6 lbs/hr from EU0520.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the kiln is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the kiln is operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any kiln any

gases which: (§60.62(a))

(1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln

(0.30 lb per ton). (§60.62(a)(1))

(2) Exhibit greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity. (§60.62(a)(2))

• If only the raw mill is operating, no owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the

atmosphere from the raw mill system any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity or

greater. (§60.62(c))

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM from the raw mill system (EU0520) to less than 0.3

pounds per ton of feed as specified in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, Standards of Performance for

Portland Cement Plants. (Special Condition #3)

• The permittee shall conduct performance tests to establish a baseline emission rate for PM10

(filterable and condensable) from the raw mill system (EU0520). (Special Condition #4)

• This emission unit is not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Performance Testing:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 97

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Within sixty (60) days of achieving full production, but in no case later than one hundred

eighty (180) days after permit issuance, an emission test shall be conducted to demonstrate

compliance with Special Conditions No. 1 through 4 of Construction Permit Number: 1197-

012A. For Special Conditions No. 4, these tests shall determine the total PM10 emission rate

(filterable and condensable) from the emission units identified in said conditions. For Special

Condition No. 3, these tests shall determine the PM emission rate as described in 40 CFR Part

60, Subpart F. All tests required by this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the

Stack Test Procedures outlined in Special Conditions No. 6 through 8. (Special Condition #5)

• Performance testing shall b conducted under the condition of maximum process/production

rate, or within ten percent (10%) of this rated capacity. The process/production rate at which

performance testing is conducted shall become the maximum process/production rate at

which this source of emissions is permitted to operate under the authority granted by this

permit. (Special Condition #8)

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall control emissions from the raw mill separator using a baghouse as

specified in the permit application. The baghouse shall be operated and maintained in

accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The baghouse shall be equipped with a

gauge or meter, which indicates the pressure drop across the control device. These gauges or

meters shall be located such that the DNR employees may easily observe them. Replacement

filters for the baghouse shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers

appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e. temperature limits, acidic and

alkali resistance and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across the baghouse at

least once every twenty-four (24) hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained

within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special

Condition #10)

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))

• Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with

§60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions

discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall

be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If

there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install,

calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack

in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))

• For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported

are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed

by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates.

Attachment E, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance

with this requirement.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.

• The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the baghouse which shall

include the following (Special Condition #11):

Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and

corrective actions; and

Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements, etc.

Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 98

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• A completed Proposed Test Plan Form must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program

thirty (30) days prior to the proposed test date so that this program may arrange a pretest

meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observer to be present.

The Proposed Test Plan must be approved by the Director of the Missouri Air Pollution Control

Program prior to conducting the required emission testing. (Special Condition #6)

• Two (2) copies of a report of the performance test results shall be submitted to the Director of

the APCP within thirty (30) days of completion of any required testing. The report must

include legible copies of the raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data and

complete sample calculations from the required EPA Method for at least one sample run.

(Special Condition #7)

• Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall

submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must

comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such

reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a))

• The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the permit condition.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0500-002

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001)

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per

million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35

mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning coal with a sulfur content of no more than

6.6% weight sulfur.

• The sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel and waste oil burned by the permittee

must no average more than 2.69% in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Special

Condition #4)

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall calculate the average sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel and

fuel oil burned monthly and rolling twelve-(12) month period.

• The sulfur content of fuel shall be analyzed and recorded.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 99

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Monthly logs shall be kept on the average sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel

and fuel oil burned. The logs must show the average sulfur content each month and shall

also show the average sulfur content over the most recent twelve (12) month period.

Attachment F, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement (Special Condition #5)

• The information contained in the required logs shall be made immediately available for

inspection to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Special

Condition #6)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0392-001 at the plant site

and be made available to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request.

(Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall maintain an accurate record of the sulfur content of fuel as fired for the

coal. The records should demonstrate that no coal utilized in the kilns was of a sulfur

content greater than 6.6 percent by weight. These records shall be made available

immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon

request.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either

the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR

10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

Permit Condition EU0500-003

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 0691-010, 0392-001)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not burn more than twenty million (20,000,000) gallons of Waste Derived

Liquid Fuel in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-

001, Special Condition #1)

• The permittee must not burn more than three million (3,000,000) gallons of non-hazardous

waste oil in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-

001, Special Condition #2)

• The permittee must not feed more than 2.1 tons/hr of tires into the kiln. (Construction Permit

Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #4 Modified from the June 1992 stack test)

• The permittee must demonstrate the following destruction and removal efficiencies:

(Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #7)

(1) Lead – ninety-eight percent (98%);

(2) Mercury – thirty-three percent (33%);

(3) Beryllium – ninety-eight percent (98%);

(4) Total Volatile Organic Compounds – ninety-nine and ninety-nine hundredths percent

(99.99%).

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall monitor the throughput of the waste derived liquid fuel, waste oil and

tires.

• The permittee shall demonstrate the destruction and removal efficiencies when conducting

Trial Burns.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 100

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Monthly burn logs for the most recent twenty-four (24) months shall be kept on site at all

times. The logs must show the total amount in gallons of Waste Derived Liquid Fuel and of

waste oil burned each month and shall also show the amount burned in the most recent

twelve (12) month period. Attachment G, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be

used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001,

Special Condition #3)

• The information contained in the required logs shall be made immediately available for

inspection to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Construction

Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #6)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0392-001 at the plant site

and be made available to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request.

(Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #9)

• Records shall be kept on-site for the number of tires burned and the amounts of alternate

fuels burned in the portland cement kiln, with both the monthly and rolling twelve (12) month

total shown. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to Department

of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Attachment G, or an equivalent created

by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Construction

Permit Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #5 Modified)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0691-010 on-site and made

available immediately for inspection to Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon

verbal request. (Construction Permit Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #6)

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR

10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 101

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-004

10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF

National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations

Emission Limitation:

For each waste stream that contains benzene, including (but not limited to) organic waste streams

that contain less than ten percent (10%) water and aqueous waste stream, even if the wastes are

not discharged to an individual drain system, the permittee shall: (§61.342(c)(1))

• Remove or destroy the benzene contained in the waste using a treatment process or

wastewater treatment system that complies with the standards specified in §61.348.

(§61.342(c)(1)(i))

• Comply with the standards specified in §§61.343 through 61.347 for each waste management

unit that receives or manages the waste stream prior to and during treatment of the waste

stream in accordance with §61.342(c)(1)(i). (§61.342(c)(1)(ii))

Treatment Process

The permittee shall design, install, operate and maintain a treatment process that either:

(§61.348(a)(1))

• Removes benzene from the waste stream to a level less than 10 parts per million by weight

(ppmw) on a flow-weighted annual average basis. (§61.348(a)(1)(i))

• Removes benzene from the waste stream by ninety-nine percent (99%) or more on a mass

basis, or (§61.348(a)(1)(ii))

• Destroys benzene in the waste stream by incinerating the waste in a combustion unit that

achieves a destruction efficiency of ninety-nine percent (99%) or greater for benzene.

(§61.348(a)(1)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 102

Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

Treatment Processes

Except as specified in §61.348(e)(3), if the treatment process unit has any openings (e.g., access

doors, hatches, etc.), all such openings shall be sealed (e.g., gasketed, latched, etc.) and kept

closed at all times when waste is being treated, except during inspection and maintenance.

(§61.348(e))

• Each seal, access door, and all other openings shall be check by visual inspections iniitally

and quarterly thereafter to ensure that no cracks or gaps occur and that openings are closed

and gasketed properly. (§61.348(e)(1))

• Except as provided in §61.350, when a broken seal or gasket or other problem is identified,

first efforts at repair shall be made as soon as practicable, but no later than fifteen (15)

calendar days after identification. (§61.348(e)(2))

• If the cover and closed-vent system operate such that the treatment process unit is

maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure, the permittee may operate the

system with an opening that is not sealed and kept closed at all times if the following

conditions are met: (§61.348(e)(3))

(1) The purpose of the opening is to provide dilution air to reduce the explosion hazard;

(§61.348(e)(3)(i))

(2) The opening is designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by the

instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above

background, as determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods

specified in §61.355(h); and (§61.348(e)(3)(ii))

(3) The pressure is monitored continuously to ensure that the pressure in the treatment process

unit remain below atmospheric pressure. (§61.348(e)(3)(iii))

Delays of Repair

• Delay of repair of facilities or units will be allowed if the repair is technically impossible

without a complete or partial facility or unit shutdown. (§61.350(a))

• Repair of such equipment shall occur before the end of the next facility or unit shutdown.

(§61.350(b))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 103

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

Compliance with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart F will be determined by review of facility records and

results from test and inspections using methods and procedures specified in §61.355. (§61.342(g))

Total Annual Benzene (TAB)

The permittee shall determine the total annual benzene (TAB) quantity from facility waste by the

following procedure: (§61.355(a))

• For each waste stream having a flow-weighted annual average water content greater than ten

percent (10%) water, on a volume basis as total water, or is mixed with water or other wastes

at any time and the resulting mixture has an annual average water content greater than ten

percent (10%) as specified in §61.342(a), the permittee shall: (§61.355(a)(1))

Determine the annual waste quantity for each waste stream using the procedures specified in

§61.355(b). (§61.355(a)(1)(i))

Determine the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration for each waste stream

using the procedures specified in §61.355(c). (§61.355(a)(1)(ii))

Calculate the annual benzene quantity for each waste stream by multiplying the annual waste

quantity of the waste stream times the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration.

(§61.355(a)(1)(iii))

• Total annual benzene quantity from facility waste is calculated by adding together the annual

benzene quantity for each waste stream generated during the year and the annual benzene

quantity for each process unit turnaround waste annualized according to §61.355(b)(4).

(§61.355(a)(2))

• The determination of annual waste quantity for wastes that are received at hazardous waste

treatment, storage, or disposal facilities from off-site shall be made at the point where the

waste enter the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. (§61.355(b)(3)

The permittee shall determine the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration in a

manner that meets the requirements given in §61.355(c)(1) using either of the methods given in

§61.355(c)(2) and §61.355(c)(3). (§61.355(c))

• The determination of flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration shall meet all of the

following criteria: (§61.355(c)(1))

The determination shall be made at the point of waste generation except for the specific cases

given in §61.355(c)(1)(i)(A) through (D). (§61.355(c)(1)(I))

(i) The determination for wastes that are received from offsite shall be made at the point

where the waste enters the hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility.

(§61.355(c)(1)(i)(C))

Volatilization of the benzene by exposure to air shall not be used in the determination to reduce

the benzene concentration. (§61.355(c)(1)(ii))

Mixing or diluting the waste stream with other wastes or other material shall be used in the

determination – to reduce the benzene concentration. (§61.355(c)(1)(iii))

For wastes with multiple phases, the determination shall provide the weighted-average benzene

concentration based on the benzene concentration in each phase of the waste and the

relative proportion of the phases. (§61.355(c)(1)(iv))

Measurement of the benzene concentration in the waste stream in accordance with the following

procedures; (§61.355(c)(3))

• Collect a minimum of three (3) representative samples from each waste stream. Where

feasible, samples shall be taken from an enclosed pipe prior to the waste being exposed to the

atmosphere. (§61.355(c)(3)(i))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 104

Project No. 031-0021-023

• For waste in enclosed pipes, the following procedures shall be used: (§61.355(c)(3)(ii))

Samples shall be collected prior to the waste being exposed to the atmosphere in order to

minimize the loss of benzene prior to sample. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(A))

A static mixer shall be installed in the process line or in a by-pass line unless the permittee

demonstrates that installation of a static mixer in the line is not necessary to accurately

determine the benzene concentration of the waste stream. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(B))

The sampling tap shall be located within two (2) pipe diameters of the static mixer outlet.

(§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(C))

Prior to the initiation of sampling, sample lines and cooling coil shall be purged with at least

four volumes of waste. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(D))

After purging, the ample flow shall be directed to a sample container and the tip of the sampling

tube shall be kept below the surface of the waste during sampling to minimize contact with

the atmosphere. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(E))

Samples shall be collected at a flow rate such that the cooling coil is able to maintain a waste

temperature less than ten degrees Celsius (10°C). (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(F))

After filling, the ample container shall be capped immediately (within 5 seconds) to leave a

minimum headspace in the container. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(G))

The sample containers shall immediately be cooled and maintained at a temperature below ten

degrees Celsius (10°C) for transfer to the laboratory. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(H))

• When sampling from an enclosed pipe is not feasible, a minimum of three (3) representative

samples shall be collected in a manner to minimize exposure of the sample to the atmosphere

and loss of benzene prior to sampling. (§61.355(c)(3)(iii))

Test Methods:

• Each waste sample shall be analyzed using one (1) of the following test methods for

determining the benzene concentration in a waste stream: (§61.355(c)(3)(iv))

Method 8010, Aromatic Volatile Organics in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,

Physical/Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(A))

Method 8021, Volatile Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Capillary Column Gas

Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series in

“Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication

No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(B))

Method 8240, Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Organics in “Test Methods

for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846;

(§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(C))

Method 8260, Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Organics: Capillary Column

Technique in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA

Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(D))

Method 602, Purgeable Aromatics, as described in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix A, Test

Procedures for Analysis of Organic Pollutants, for wastewaters for which this is an approved

EPA methods; or (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(E))

Method 624, Purgeables, as described in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix A, Test Procedures for

Analysis of Organic Pollutants, for wastewaters for which this is an approved EPA method.

(§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(F))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 105

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Each record shall be maintained in a readily accessible location at the installation for a period

not less than five years form the date the information is recorded unless otherwise specified.

(§61.356(a))

• The permittee shall maintain records that identify each waste stream at the installation

subject to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF and indicate whether or not the waste stream is

controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with this subpart. In addition, the permittee

shall maintain the following records: (§61.356(b))

For each waste stream not controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with this subpart,

the records shall include all test results, measurements, calculations, and other

documentation used to determine the following information for the waste stream: waste

stream identification, water content, whether or not the waste stream is a process

wastewater stream, annual waste quantity, range of benzene concentrations, annual average

flow-weighted benzene concentration and annual benzene quantity. (§61.356(b)(1))

• The permittee using a treatment process or wastewater treatment system unit in accordance

with §61.348 shall maintain the following records. The documentation shall be retained for

the life of the unit. (§61.356(e))

A statement signed and dated by the permittee certifying that the unit is designed to operate at

the documented performance level when the waste stream entering the unit is at the highest

waste stream flow rate and benzene content expected to occur. (§61.356(e)(1))

If engineering calculation are used to determine treatment process or wastewater treatment

system unit performance, then the permittee shall maintain the complete design analysis for

the unit. The design analysis shall include for example the following information: Design

specifications, drawings, schematics, piping and instrumentation diagrams, an other

documentation necessary to demonstrate the unit performance. (§61.356(e)(2))

If performance tests are used to determine treatment process or wastewater treatment system

unit performance then the permittee shall maintain all test information necessary to

demonstrate the unit performance. (§61.356(e)(3))

(i) A description of the unit including the following information: type of treatment process;

manufacturer name and model number; and for each waste stream entering and exiting

the u nit, the waste stream type (e.g., process wastewater, sludge, slurry, etc.), and the

design flow rate an benzene content. (§61.356(e)(3)(i))

(ii) Documentation describing the test protocol and the means by which sampling

variability and analytical variability were accounted for in the determination of the unit

performance. The description of the test protocol shall include the following

information: sampling locations, sampling method, sampling frequency, and analytical

procedures used for sample analysis. (§61.356(e)(3)(ii))

(iii) Records of unit operating conditions during each test run including all key process

parameters. (§61.356(e)(3)(iii))

(iv) All test results. (§61.356(e)(3)(iv))

• For each treatment process operated to comply with §61.348, the permittee shall maintain

documentation that includes the following information regarding the unit operation:

(§61.356(i))

Dates of startup and shutdown of the unit. (§61.356(i)(1))

Periods of when the unit is not operated as designed. (§61.356(i)(2))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 106

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• Beginning on the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been

certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit annually to the

Administrator a report that updates the following. If the information in the annual report

required below is not changed in the following year, the permittee may submit a statement to

that effect.: (§61.357(d)(2))

Periods of when the unit is not operated as designed. (§61.356(i)(2))Total annual benzene

quantity form facility waste determined in accordance with §61.355(a). (§61.357(a)(1))

A table identifying each waste stream and whether or not the waste stream will be controlled for

benzene emissions in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF.

((§61.357(a)(2))

For each waste stream identified as not being controlled for benzene emissions in accordance

with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, the following information shall be

added to the table: (§61.357(a)(3))

(i) Whether or not the water content of the waste stream is greater than ten percent

(10%); (§61.357(a)(3)(i))

(ii) Whether or not the waste stream is a process wastewater stream, product tank

drawdown, or landfill leachate; (§61.357(a)(3)(ii))

(iii) Annual waste quantity for the waste stream; (§61.357(a)(3)(iii))

(iv) Range of benzene concentrations for the waste stream; (§61.357(a)(3)(iv))

(v) Annual average flow-weighted benzene concentration for the waste stream; and

(§61.357(a)(3)(v))

(vi) Annual benzene quantity for the waste stream. (§61.357(a)(3)(vi))

• Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these

standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit

quarterly to the Administrator a certification that all of the required inspections have been

carried out in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. (§61.357(d)(6))

Permit Condition EU0500-005 and EU0510-002

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter (PM)

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of a kiln, clinker cooler or raw mill system shall cause to be discharged

into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain particulate matter

in excess of 0.15 kg per MG (0.30 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln. When there is an

alkali bypass associated with a kiln, the combined particulate matter emissions from the kiln

and the alkali bypass are subject to this emission limit. (modified §63.1343(b)(1))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the raw mill is operating without the kiln, the raw mill is not subject to this permit

condition.

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-005 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-014 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 107

Project No. 031-0021-023

Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the kiln by conducting a performance

test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(I) through (b)(1)(iv). The permittee shall demonstrate initial

compliance with the in-line kiln/raw mill by conducting separate performance tests as

specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv) while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is

under normal operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not

operating. (§63.1349)(b)(1))

• EPA Method 5 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine PM emissions.

Each performance test shall consist of three (3) separate runs under the conditions that exist

when the in-line kiln/raw mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one (1) hour, and the minimum

sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (thirty (30) dscf). The average of the three (3) runs shall be

used to determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the

impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to

demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not

preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other

purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine in-line kiln/raw mill feed rate, except for fuels,

for each run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation

(§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): E = ( ) CsQsd P

Where:

E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed

Cs = concentration of PM, kg/dscm

Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• When there is an alkali bypass associated with an in-line kiln/raw mill, the main exhaust and

alkali bypass of the in-line kiln/raw mill shall be tested simultaneously and the combined

emission rate of particulate matter from the in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass shall be

computed for each run using the following equation (§63.1349(b)(1)(iv)):

Ec = ( ) CskQsdk + CsbQsdb P

Where:

Ec = the combined emission rate of PM from the in-line kiln/raw mill and bypass stack,

kg/Mg of kiln feed

Csk = concentration of PM in in-line kiln/raw mill effluent, kg/dscm

Qsdk = volumetric flow rate of in-line kiln/raw mill effluent, dscm/hr

Csb = concentration of PM in the alkali bypass gas, kg/dscm

Qsdb = volumetric flow rate of alkali bypass gas, dscm/hr

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall be

repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw

mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within ninety (90) days of initiating any

significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test.

(§63.1349(e))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 108

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter

continuous emission monitoring system (PM CEMS) to measure the particulate matter

discharged to the atmosphere. The compliance deadline for installing the PM CEMS and all

requirements relating to performance of the PM CEMS and implementation of the PM CEMS

requirement is deferred pending further rulemaking. (§63.1350(k))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under

§63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2))

If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in

Permit Condition: PW008.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests

as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a

continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring

system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data

indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating

parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 109

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-006 and EU0510-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

• If the raw mill and kiln are operating, no owner or operator of a kiln, clinker cooler and raw

mill system shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any

gases which exhibit opacity greater than twenty percent (20%). (modified §63.1343(b)(2))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the raw mill is operating without the kiln, the owner or operator of each raw mill shall not

cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any

gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1347)

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-006 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-015 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate

matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v)

through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited ruing the period of the Method 5

performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the use of a

continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity during the

three (3) Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run, and used to

demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2).

(§63.1349(b)(1)(v))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall monitor opacity at each point where

emissions are vented from these affected sources including alkali bypasses in accordance with

§63.1350(c)(1) through (c)(3). (§63.1350(c))

• Except as provided in §63.1350(c)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain,

and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor (COM) located at the outlet of the PM

control device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be installed, maintained,

calibrated, and operated as required by Subpart A, general provisions of this part, and

according to PS-1 of Appendix B to 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1350(c)(1))

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the six (6) minute average

opacity for any six (6) minute block period does not exceed twenty percent (20%). If the

average opacity for any six (6) minute block period exceeds twenty percent (20%), this shall

constitute a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(c)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 110

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous

opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test

required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous

opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e). (§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a

continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring

system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data

indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating

parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition EU0500-007 and EU0510-004

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Dioxins and Furans (D/F)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 111

Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall cause to be discharged into the

atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain D/F in excess of:

(1) 0.20 ng per dscm (8.7x10-11 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen; or

(2) 0.40 ng per dscm (1.7x10-10 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen, when the

average of the performance test run average temperatures at the inlet to the particulate

matter control device is two hundred four degrees Celsius (204°C) (four hundred degrees

Fahrenheit (400°F)) or less. (§63.1343(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under

§63.1343 must operate the in-line kiln/raw mill, such that (§63.1344(a)):

(1) When the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is operating, the applicable temperature limit

for the main in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust specified in §63.1344(b) and established during

the performance test when the raw mill was operating is not exceeded. (§63.1344(a)(1))

(2) When the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating , the applicable temperature

limit for the main in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust, specified in §63.1344(b) and established

during the performance test when the raw mill was not operating, is not exceeded.

(§63.1344(a)(2))

(3) If the in-line kiln/raw mill is equipped with an alkali bypass, the applicable temperature

limit for the alkali bypass, specified in §63.1344(b) and established during the performance

test when the raw mill was operating, is not exceeded. (§63.1344(a)(3))

• The temperature limit for in-line kiln/raw mill meeting the limits of §63.1344(a)(1) through

§63.1344(a)(3) is determined in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1344(b))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under

§63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique must operate the

carbon injection system in accordance with §63.1344(c)(1) and §63.1344(c)(2). (§63.1344(c))

(1) The three-(3) hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate shall be equal to or greater

than the activated carbon injection rate determine in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(vi).

(§63.1344(c)(1))

(2) The owner or operator shall either (§63.1344(c)(2)):

(i) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate, as a three-(3)

hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specification. These specifications

must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with §63.7(c), or

(§63.1344(c)(2)(i))

(ii) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas pressure drop, as a

three-(3) hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specifications. These

specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with

§63.7(c). (§63.1344(c)(2)(ii))

• Except as provided in §63.1344(e), the owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to

a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission

control techniques must specify and use the brand and type of activated carbon used during

the performance test until a subsequent performance test is conducted, unless the sitespecific performance test plan contain documentation of key parameters that affect adsorption

and the owner or operator establishes limits based on those parameters, and the limits on

these parameters are maintained §63.1344(d).

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under

§63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques may substitute, at

any time, a different brand or type of activated carbon provided that the replacement has

equivalent or improved properties compared to the activated carbon specified in the sitespecific performance test plan and used in the performance test. The owner or operator must

maintain documentation that the substitute activated carbon will provide the same or better

level of control as the original activated carbon §63.1344(e).
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 112

Project No. 031-0021-023

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-007 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-008 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the D/F emission limit by

conducting a performance test using Method 23 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60.

(§63.1349(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall demonstrate initial compliance by

conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is under

normal operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not

operating. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill equipped with an alkali bypass shall conduct

simultaneous performance tests of the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust and the alkali

bypass, however the owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill is not required to conduct a

performance test of the alkali bypass exhaust when the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is

not operating. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• Each performance test shall consist of three (3) separate runs; each run shall be conducted

under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or

capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at least three

(3) hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least two and one-half dry standard

cubic meters (2.5 dscm) ( ninety dry standard cubic feet (90 dscf)). The concentration shall be

determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the concentrations measure for the

three (3) runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. (§63.1349(b)(3)(i))

• The temperature at the inlet to the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill PMCD, and where applicable,

the temperature at the inlet to the alkali bypass PMCD, must be continuously recorded during

the period of the Method 23 test, and the continuos temperature record(s) must be included in

the performance test report. (§63.1349(b)(3)(ii))

• One (1)-minute average temperatures must be calculated for each minute of each run of the

test. (§63.1349(b)(3)(iii))

• The run average temperature must be calculated for each run, and the average of the run

average temperatures must be determined and included in the performance test report and

will determine the applicable temperature limit in accordance with §63.1344(b).

(§63.1349(b)(3)(iv))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(3) shall be repeated every 30 months.

(§63.1349(d))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw

mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within ninety (90) days of initiating any

significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test.

(§63.1349(e))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 113

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an affected source subject to a limitation on D/F emissions shall

monitor D/F emissions in accordance with §63.1350(f)(1) through (f)(6). (§63.1350(f))

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate a continuous

monitor to record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the in-line kiln/raw mill and

alkali bypass, at the inlet to, or upstream of, the in-line kiln/raw mill and/or alkali bypass PM

control devices. (§63.1350(f)(1))

(1) The recorder response range must include zero (0) and 1.5 times either of the average

temperatures established according to the requirements in §63.1349(b)(3)(iv).

(§63.1350(f)(1)(i))

(2) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated

reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject to approval by

the Administrator. (§63.1350(f)(1)(ii))

• The owner or operator shall monitor and continuously record the temperature of the exhaust

gases from the in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, at the inlet to the in-line kiln/raw mill

and/or alkali bypass PMCD. (§63.1350(f)(2))

• The three-(3) hour rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of one

hundred eighty (180) successive one (1)-minute average temperatures. (§63.1350(f)(3))

• Periods of time when one (1)-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when

calculating three-(3) hour rolling averages. When one (1)-minute averages become available,

the first one (1)-minute average is added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-(3)

hour rolling average. (§63.1350(f)(4))

• When the operating status of the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is changed from off to on,

or form on to off the calculation of the three-(3) hour rolling average temperature must begin

anew, with considering previous recordings. (§63.1350(f)(5))

• The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least

once every three months. (§63.1350(f)(6))

• The owner or operator of any in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limit shall

conduct an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each in-line kiln/raw

mill at least once per year. (§63.1350(i))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 114

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in

Permit Condition: PW008.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests

as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator shall submit a written report of the results

of the performance evaluation for the continuous monitoring system required by §63.8(e). The

owner or operator shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of the performance

test. (§63.1354(b)(6))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 115

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-008

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Dioxins and Furans

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gasses to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain(§63.1204(a)(1):

(1) dioxins and furans in excess of 0.20 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen;

or (§63.1204(a)(1)(i))

(2) dioxins and furans in excess of 0.40 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen

provided that the combustion gas temperature at the inlet to the initial particulate matter

control device is 400°F or lower based on the average of the test run average temperature.

(§63.1204(a)(1)(ii))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-007 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-008 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

Operating Parameters:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 116

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the dioxin and furans emission standard by establishing and

complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits

on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on

manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(k))

(1) Gas Temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control device. (§63.1209(k)(1))

(i) If the combustor is equipped with an electrostatic precipitator, baghouse (fabric filter) or

other dry emissions control device where particulate matter is suspended in contact

with combustion gas, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum

temperature of the gas at the inlet to the device on an hourly rolling average. The

permittee must establish the hourly rolling average limit as the average of the test run

averages. (§63.1209(k)(1)(I))

(2) Minimum combustion chamber temperature. (§63.1209(k)(2))

(i) The permittee must measure the temperature of each combustion chamber at a location

that best represents, as practicable, the bulk gas temperature in the combustion zone.

The permittee must document the temperature measurement location in the test plan

the permittee submits under §63.1207(e) and (f); (§63.1209(k)(2)(i))

(ii) The permittee must establish a minimum hourly rolling average limit as the average of

the test run averages; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii))

(3) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate. (§63.1209(k)(3))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device the permittee must establish

and comply with a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production

rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as

an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly

rolling averages for each run; (§63.1209(k)(3)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis;

(§63.1209(k)(3)(ii))

(4) Maximum waste feedrate. (§63.1209(k)(4))

(i) The permittee must establish limits on the maximum pumpable and total (i.e.,

pumpable and nonpumpable) waste feedrate for each location where waste is fed;

(§63.1209(k)(4)(i))

(ii) The permittee must establish the limits as the average of the maximum hourly rolling

averages for each run. (§63.1209(k)(4)(ii))

(iii) The permittee must comply with the feedrate limit(s) on a hourly rolling average basis;

(§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin

calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the

permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of

operation. (§63.1209(q))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 117

Project No. 031-0021-023

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 0023A, Sampling Method for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-pDioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans emissions from Stationary Sources, EPA

Publication SW-846, as incorporated by reference in §63.1208(a), to determine compliance

with the emission standard for dioxins and furans; (§63.1208(b)(1)(i))

• The permittee must sample for a minimum of three (3) hours, and the permittee must collect a

minimum sample volume of two and one-half dry standard cubic meters (2.5 dscm);

(§63.1208(b)(1)(ii))

• The permittee may assume that nondetects are present a zero (0) concentration.

(§63.1208(b)(1)(iii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 118

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing as

specified in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• The permittee shall monitor the gas temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control

device on an hourly rolling average;(§63.1209(k)(1)(i))

• The permittee shall monitor the combustion chamber temperature on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(k)(3)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the waste feedrate on an hourly rolling average;

(§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must begin calculating rolling

averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins

complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation.

(§63.1209(q))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one

percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified

at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 119

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing

record keeping requirements as stated in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) Gas temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control device; (§63.1209(k)(1)(i))

(2) Combustion chamber temperature; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii))

(3) Flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(k)(3)(ii))

(4) Waste feedrate; (§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive and confirmatory performance test

plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive and confirmatory performance test

results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 120

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing

reporting requirements as stated in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-009

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Mercury

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain mercury in excess of one hundred twenty (120) μg/dscm corrected to

seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(2))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition

PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of eightyeight (88) μg/dscm or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(A))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 121

Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the mercury emission standard by establishing and

complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits

on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on

manufacturer specifications: (§63.1209(l))

(1) Feedrate of Total Mercury – The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average

limit for the total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams as the average of test run averages,

unless mercury feedrate limits are extrapolated from performance test feedrate levels under

the following provisions: (§63.1209(l)(1))

(i) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and (c)

and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the mercury feedrates and associated emission rates

during the comprehensive performance test to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate

limits and emission rates. (§63.1209(l)(1)(i))

(ii) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the

Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii))

(A) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at least

at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some level of

spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of spiked

material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii)(A))

(B) Whether the extrapolate feedrates the permittee requests are warranted considering

historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii)(B))

(iii) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of

compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee have

interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is

appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(l)(1)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin

calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the

permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of

operation. (§63.1209(q))

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate

compliance with the emission standard for mercury. (§63.1208(b)(2))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 122

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for

particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating

parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit

condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams on a twelve (12)

hour rolling average; (§63.1209(l)(1))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must begin calculating rolling

averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins

complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation.

(§63.1209(q))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the

weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every

three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 123

Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) Total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(l)(1))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 124

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-010

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Lead and Cadmium (Semi-Volatile Metals)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain lead and cadmium in excess of two hundred forty (240) μg/dscm,

combined emissions, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(3))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition

PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of thirty-one

thousand (31,000) μg/dscm or less and use of a particulate matter control device that

achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(B))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.

Operating Parameters:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 125

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the semivolatile metal (cadmium and lead) and low volatile

metal (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) emission standards by establishing and complying

with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on

operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on

manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(n))

(1) The permittee must establish a limit on the maximum inlet temperature to the primary dry

metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly

rolling average basis as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(1))

(2) Maximum Feedrate of semivolatile and low volatile metals. (§63.1209(n)(2))

(i) The permittee must establish feedrate limits for semivolatile metals (cadmium and lead)

and low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium and chromium) as follows, except as

provided by §63.1209(n)(2)(ii): (§63.1209(n)(2)(i))

(A) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of cadmium and lead, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of test run

averages; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A))

(B) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of arsenic, beryllium and chromium, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of

the test run averages; and (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B))

(C) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of arsenic, beryllium, and chromium, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams as the

average of the test run averages. Dual feedrate limits for both pumpable and total

feedstreams are not required, however, if the permittee bases the total feedrate limit

solely on the feedrate of pumpable feedstreams. (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C))

(ii) Feedrate extrapolation. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii))

(A) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and

(c) and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the semivolatile metal and low volatile metal

feedrates and associated emission rates during the comprehensive performance test

to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate limits and emission rates.

(§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 126

Project No. 031-0021-023

(B) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the

Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B))

(1) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at

least at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some

level of spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of

spiked material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(1))

(2) Whether the extrapolated feedrates the permittee requests are warranted

considering historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(2))

(C) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of

compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee

has interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is

appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(C))

(3) The permittee must establish operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control

device as specified by §63.1209(m)(1): (§63.1209(n)(3))

(i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must

establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each

baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with

the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(4) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of total

chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages.

(§63.1209(n)(4))

(5) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate. (§63.1209(n)(5))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish

a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another

parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate

surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages

for each run. (§63.1209(n)(5)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis.

(§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to determine

compliance with the emission standard for cadmium and lead (combined). (§63.1208(b)(3))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 127

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for

particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating

parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit

condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control

device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for semivolatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams

on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an

hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• If the alternate standard provision is utilized, the permittee shall monitor the feedrate of total

chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one

percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified

at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 128

Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) Inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device; (§63.1209(n)(1))

(2) Feedrate for semivolatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A))

(3) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(4) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the

following:

(1) The feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks on the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 129

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-011

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Arsenic, Beryllium and Chromium (Low Volatility Metals)

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain arsenic, beryllium and chromium in excess of fifty-six (56) μg/dscm,

combined emissions, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(4))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition

PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of fifty-four

thousand (54,000) μg/dscm or less and use of a particulate matter control device that

achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(C))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.

Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the low volatile metal (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium)

emission standards by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter

limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive

performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications: (§63.1209(n))

(1) The permittee must establish a limit on the maximum inlet temperature to the primary dry

metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly

rolling average basis as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(1))

(2) Maximum Feedrate of semivolatile and low volatile metals. (§63.1209(n)(2))

(i) The permittee must establish feedrate limits for semivolatile metals (cadmium and lead)

and low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium and chromium) as follows, except as

provided by §63.1209(n)(2)(ii): (§63.1209(n)(2)(i))

(A) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of cadmium and lead, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of the test run

averages; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A))

(B) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of arsenic, beryllium and chromium, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of

the test run averages; and (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B))

(C) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate

of arsenic, beryllium, and chromium, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams as the

average of the test run averages. Dual feedrate limits for both pumpable and total

feedstreams are not required, however, if the permittee base the total feedrate limit

solely on the feedrate of pumpable feedstreams. (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 130

Project No. 031-0021-023

(ii) Feedrate extrapolation. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii))

(A) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and

(c) and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the semivolatile metal and low volatile metal

feedrates and associated emission rates during the comprehensive performance test

to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate limits and emission rates.

(§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A))

(B) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the

Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B))

(1) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at

least at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some

level of spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of

spiked material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(1))

(2) Whether the extrapolated feedrates the permittee requests are warranted

considering historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(2))

(C) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of

compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee

has interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is

appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(C))

(3) The permittee must establish operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control

device as specified by §63.1209(m)(1): (§63.1209(n)(3))

(i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must

establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each

baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with

the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(4) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of total

chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages.

(§63.1209(n)(4))

(5) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(n)(5))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish

a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another

parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate

surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages

for each run. (§63.1209(n)(5)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis.

(§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate

compliance with the emission standard for arsenic, beryllium and chromium. (§63.1208(b)(4))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 131

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for

particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating

parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit

condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control

device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams

on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all pumpable

feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(I)(C))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an

hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• If the alternate standard provision is utilized, the permittee shall monitor the feedrate of total

chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one

percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified

at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 132

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) Inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device; (§63.1209(n)(1))

(2) Feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B))

(3) Feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams;

(§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C))

(4) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(5) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the

following:

(1) The feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 133

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-012

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons

Emission Limitation:

• For kilns equipped with a by-pass duct – The permittee must not discharge or cause

combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain carbon monoxide and

hydrocarbons, either (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)):

(1) Carbon monoxide in the by-pass duct or mid-kiln gas sampling system in excess of one

hundred (100) parts per million by volume, over an hourly rolling average (monitored

continuously with a continuous emissions monitoring system), dry basis and corrected to

seven percent (7%) oxygen. If the permittee elects to comply with this carbon monoxide

standard rather than the hydrocarbon standard under §63.1204(a)(5)(I)(B), the permittee

must also document that, during the destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) test runs or

their equivalent as provided by §63.1206(b)(7), hydrocarbons in the by-pass duct or mid-kiln

gas sampling system do not exceed ten (10) parts per million by volume during those runs,

over an hourly rolling average (monitored continuously with a continuous emissions

monitoring system), dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen, and reported as

propane; or (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)(A))

(2) Hydrocarbons in the by-pass duct or midkiln gas sampling system in excess of ten (10) parts

per million by volume, over an hourly rolling average (monitored continuously with a

continuous emissions monitoring system), dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen,

and reported as propane. (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)(B))

• For kilns that feed hazardous waste at a location other than the end where products are

normally discharged and where fuels are normally fired must comply with the twenty (20)

parts per million by volume hydrocarbon standard in the main stack under

§63.1204(a)(5)(ii)(A); (§63.1206(b)(13)(i)(A))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 134

Project No. 031-0021-023

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.

Note: The monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed does not include the CEM

requirements of HC, CO and O2.

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use applicable test methods in EPA Publication SW-846, as incorporated

by reference in §63.1208(a), as necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements of this

subpart, except as otherwise specified in §63.1208(b)(2) – (b)(6). (§63.1208(b)(7))

Monitoring:

• Carbon monoxide standard using continuous emissions monitoring system and document

compliance with the hydrocarbon standard during the destruction and removal efficiency

performance test or its equivalent. (§63.1206(b)(6))

(1) If a DRE test performed after March 30, 1998 is acceptable as documentation of compliance

with the DRE standard, the permittee may use the highest hourly rolling average

hydrocarbon level achieved during those DRE test runs to document compliance with the

hydrocarbon standard. An acceptable DRE test is a test that was used to support

successful issuance or reissuance of an operating permit under Part 270 of this Chapter.

(§63.1206(b)(6)(i))

(2) If during this acceptable DRE test, the permittee did not obtain hydrocarbon emissions data

sufficient to document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard, the permittee must

either: (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii))

(i) Perform, as part of the performance test, an “equivalent DRE test” to document

compliance with the hydrocarbon standard. An equivalent DRE test is comprised of a

minimum of three (3) runs each with a minimum duration of one (1) hour during which

the permittee operates the combustor as close as reasonably possible to the operating

parameter limits that the permittee established based on the initial DRE test. The

permittee must use the highest hourly rolling average hydrocarbon emission level

achieved during the equivalent DRE test to document compliance with the hydrocarbon

standard; or (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii)(A))

(ii) Perform a DRE test as part of the performance test. (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii)(B))

• CEMS - The permittee must use either a carbon monoxide or hydrocarbon CEMS to

demonstrate and monitor compliance with the carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon standard.

The permittee must also use an oxygen CEMS to continuously correct the carbon monoxide or

hydrocarbon levels to seven percent (7%) oxygen. (§63.1209(a)(1)(i))

• CEMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate the CEMS

and COMS in compliance with the quality assurance procedures provided in the Appendix to

this subpart and Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen), and 8A

(hydrocarbons) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• CO CEMS - Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(3)(ii), if a carbon monoxide CEMS detects a

response that results in a one (1)-minute average at or above the 3,000 ppmv span level

required by Performance Specification 4B in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60, the one (1)-minute

average must be recorded as ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv). The

one (1)-minute ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv) value must be used

for calculating the hourly rolling average carbon monoxide level. (§63.1209(a)(3)(i))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 135

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Carbon monoxide CEMS that use a span value of ten thousand parts per million by volume

(10,000 ppmv) when one (1)-minute carbon monoxide levels are equal to or exceed 3,000 ppmv

are not subject to §63.1209(a)(3)(i) . Carbon monoxide CEMS that use a span value of 10,000

are subject to the same CEMS performance and equipment specifications when operating in

the ranges of 3,000 ppmv to ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv) that are

provided by Performance Specification 4B for other carbon monoxide CEMS, except:

(§63.1209(a)(3)(ii))

(1) Calibration drift must be less than 300 ppmv; and (§63.1209(a)(3)(ii)(A))

(2) Calibration error must be less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500

ppmv). (§63.1209(a)(3)(ii)(B))

• Hydrocarbon CEMS – Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(4)(ii), if a hydrocarbon CEMS detects

a response that results in a one (1)-minute average at or above the one hundred parts per

million by volume (100 ppmv) span level required by Performance Specification 8A in Appendix

B, 40 CFR Part 60, the one (1)-minute average must be recorded as five hundred parts per

million by volume (500 ppmv). The one (1)-minute five hundred parts per million by volume

(500 ppmv) value must be used for calculating the hourly rolling average HC level.

(§63.1209(a)(4)(i))

• Hydrocarbon CEMS that use a span value of five hundred parts per million by volume (500

ppmv) when one (1)-minute hydrocarbon levels are equal to or exceed one hundred parts per

million by volume (100 ppmv) are not subject to §63.1209(a)(4)(i). Hydrocarbon CEMS that

use a span value of five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) are subject to the

same CEMS performance and equipment specifications when operating in the range of one

hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv) to five hundred parts per million by volume

(500 ppmv) that are provided by Performance Specification 8A for other hydrocarbon CEMS,

except: (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii))

(1) The zero (0) and high-level calibration gas must have a hydrocarbon level of between 0 and

one hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv), and between 250 and 450 ppmv,

respectively; (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(A))

(2) The strip chart recorder, computer, or digital recorder must be capable of recording all

readings within the CEM measurement range and must have a resolution of two and onehalf parts per million by volume (2.5 ppmv); (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(B))

(3) The CEMS calibration must not differ by more than ±15 ppmv after each 24-hour period of

the seven day test at both zero (0) and high levels; (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(C))

(4) The calibration error must be no greater than 25 ppmv; and (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(D))

(5) The zero (0) level, mid-level, and high-level calibration gas used to determine calibration

error must have a hydrocarbon level of 0-200 ppmv, 150-200 ppmv, and 350-400 ppmv,

respectively. (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(E))

• The permittee must comply with the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed in

Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous

Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

• The performance specifications for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and oxygen CEMSs in

Subpart B, 40 CFR Part 60 requires detectors to measure the sample concentration at least

once every fifteen (15) seconds for calculating an average emission rate once every sixty (60)

seconds shall be complied with instead of §63.8(c)(4)(ii); and (§63.1209(f)(2))

• Sections 63.8(c)(4)(i), (c)(5), and (c)(7)(i)(C) pertaining to COMS apply only to owners and

operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns. (§63.1209(f)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 136

Project No. 031-0021-023

Calculation of Rolling Averages:

• The carbon monoxide or hydrocarbon CEMS must begin recording one (1)-minute average

values by 12:01 am and hourly rolling average values by 1:01 am, when sixty (60) one (1)-

minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average for those

sources that come into compliance on the regulatory compliance date. Sources that elect to

come into compliance before the regulatory compliance date must begin recording one (1)-

minute and holurly rolling average values within sixty (60) seconds and sixty (60) minutes

(when sixty (60) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling

average), respectively, from the time at which compliance begins. (§63.1209(a)(6)(i))

• The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the hourly rolling average. When one (1)-minute values become available again,

the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous fifty-nine (59) values to calculate the

hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(a)(6)(ii))

• Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(B), the permittee

must continue monitoring carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon when the hazardous waste feed

is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if

the emission levels exceed the standard. (§63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(A))

• The permittee is not subject to the CEMS requirements during periods of time you meet the

requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous

waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(B))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the CEMs. The permittee shall

maintain records on the following concentrations in 15 second intervals to calculate an

average emission rate once every sixty (60) seconds: (§63.1209(f)(2))

(1) Carbon Monoxide;

(2) Hydrocarbon;

(3) Oxygen

• The permittee shall maintain records of all calibration records obtained during compliance

with the quality assurance procedures provide in the appendix to this subpart and

Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen), and 8A (hydrocarbons) in

Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures provided in the

appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen),

and 8A (hydrocarbons) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed

in Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous

Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 137

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-013

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Hydrochloric Acid and Chlorine Gas

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain hydrochloric acid and chlorine gas in excess of one hundred thirty

(130) parts per million by volume, combined emissions, expressed as hydrochloric acid

equivalents, dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen. (§63.1204(a)(6))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition

PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste chlorine feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of

seven hundred twenty thousand (720,000) μg/dscm or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(D))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.

Operating Parameters:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 138

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the hydrogen chloride and chlorine gas emissions standard

by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee

must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the

limits are based on manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(o))

(1) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the total feedrate of

chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages.

(§63.1209(o)(1))

(2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(o)(2))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish

a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another

parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate

surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages

for each run. (§63.1209(o)(2)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis;

(§63.1209(o)(2)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 139

Project No. 031-0021-023

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use Methods 26A, 320 or 321, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to

demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for hydrochloric acid and chlorine gas

(combined). The permittee may use Methods 320 or 321 to make major source determinations

under §63.9(b)(2)(v). (§63.1208(b)(5))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for

particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating

parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit

condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the total feedrate of chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all

feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(o)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(o)(2)(ii))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the

weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every

three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 140

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am, hourly rolling average values by 1:01 am (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute

values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average), and twelve (12)-

hour rolling averages by 12:01 pm (e.g., when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute

averages are available to calculate a twelve (12)-hour rolling average), for those sources that

come into compl.iance on the regulatory compliance date. Sources that elect to come into

compliance before the regulatory compliance date must begin recording one (1)-minute,

hourly rolling average, and twleve (12)-hour rolling average values within sixty (60) seconds,

sixty (60) minutes (when sixty (60) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the

initial hourly rolling average), and seven hundred twenty (720) minutes (when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial twelve

(12)-hour hourly rolling average) respectively, from the time at which compliance begins.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) The total feedrate of chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(o)(1))

(2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(o)(2)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 141

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-014

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Particulate Matter

Emission Limitation:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 142

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed. (§63.1204(a)(7))

• The permittee must use suitable methods to determine the kiln raw material feedrate.

(§63.1204(a)(7)(i))

• Except as provided in §63.1204(a)(7)(iii), the permittee must compute the particulate matter

emission rate, E from the following equation: E = ( ) Cs ×Qsd P

Where:

E = emission rate of particulate matter, kg/Mg of kiln raw material feed;

Cs = concentration of particulate matter, kg/dscm;

Qsd = volumetric flowrate of effluent gas, dscm/hr;

P = total kiln raw material feed (dry basis), Mg/hr (§63.1204(a)(7)(ii))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests – Any particulate matter and opacity standards of

Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity

standards) applicable to a hazardous waste combustor do not apply while you conduct

particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) correlation tests under

the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(i))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests - Any permit or other emissions or operating

parameter limits or conditions, including any limitation on workplace practices, that are

applicable to hazardous waste combustors to ensure compliance with any particulate matter

and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40

particulate or opacity standards) do not apply while the permittee conducts particulate matter

CEMS correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii).

(§63.1206(b)(8)(ii))

• For the provisions of this section to apply, the permittee must: (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii))

(1) Develop a particulate matter CEMS correlation test plan that includes the following

information. This test plan may be included as part of the comprehensive performance test

plan required under §§63.1207(e) and (f): (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A))

(i) Number of test conditions and number of runs for each test condition;

(§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(1))

(ii) Target particulate matter emission level for each test condition; (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(2))

(iii) How you plan to modify operations to attain the desired particulate matter emission

levels; and (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(3))

(iv) Anticipate normal particulate matter emission levels; and (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(4))

• The particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions

will not be waived for more than ninety-six (96) hours, in the aggregate, for a correlation test,

including all runs of all test conditions. (§63.1206(b)(8)(v))

• The permittee must return to operating conditions indicative of compliance with the applicable

particulate matter and opacity standards as soon as possible after correlation testing is

completed. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 143

Project No. 031-0021-023

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the permittee selects the alternate emission standard provision for semivolatile metals

and/or low volatile metals, the permittee must utilize a particulate matter control device that

achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(B

and/or C))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-005 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-014 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the particulate matter emission standard by establishing and

complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits

on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on

manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(m))

(1) Control Device Operating Parameter Limits (OPLs) (§63.1209(m)(1))

(i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must

establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each

baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with

the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(m)(2))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish

a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another

parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate

surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages

for each run. (§63.1209(m)(2)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis:

(§63.1209(m)(2)(ii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin

calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the

permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of

operation. (§63.1209(q))

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Methods 5 or 5I, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to

demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for particulate matter. (§63.1208(b)(6))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 144

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The stack sampling team must be on-site and prepared to perform correlation testing no later

than twenty-four (24) hours after the permittee modifies operations to attain the desired

particulate matter emissions concentrations, unless the permittee documents in the

correlation test plan that a longer period of conditioning is appropriate. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vi))

• CEMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter

CEMS to demonstrate and monitor compliance with the particulate matter standards.

However, compliance with the requirements in their section to install, calibrate, maintain and

operate the PM CEMS is not required until such time that the Agency promulgates all

performance specifications and operational requirements applicable to PM CEMS.

(§63.1209(a)(1)(iii))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for

particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric

acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating

parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee must comply with the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed in

Appendix to Subpart EE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous Emissions

Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an

hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(m)(2))

• The permittee shall monitor the ash feedrate; (§63.1209(m)(3))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin

calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the

permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of

operation. (§63.1209(q))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the

weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every

three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 145

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

(2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(m)(2))

(3) The ash feedrate; (§63.1209(m)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the

following:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the CEMS correlation test plan;

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks on the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish

operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating

record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the

operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 146

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• Submit the particulate matter CEMS correlation test plan to the Administrator for approval at

least ninety (90) calendar days before the correlation test is scheduled to be conducted.

(§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(B))

• The Administrator will review and approve/disapprove the correlation test plan under the

procedures for review and approval of the site-specific test plan provided by §63.7(c)(3)(i) and

(iii). If the Administrator fails to approve or disapprove the correlation test plan within the

time period specified by §63.7(c)(3)(i), the plan is considered approved, unless the

Administrator has requested additional information. (§63.1206(b)(8)(iv))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 147

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-015

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the

atmosphere that contain an opacity greater than twenty percent (20%). (§63.1204(a)(7))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures.

Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3)

significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to

document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests – Any particulate matter and opacity standards of

Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity

standards) applicable to a hazardous waste combustor do not apply while you conduct

particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) correlation tests under

the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(i))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests - Any permit or other emissions or operating

parameter limits or conditions, including any limitation on workplace practices, that are

applicable to hazardous waste combustors to ensure compliance with any particulate matter

and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40

particulate or opacity standards) do not apply while the permittee conducts particulate matter

CEMS correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii).

(§63.1206(b)(8)(ii))

• The particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions

will not be waived for more than ninety-six (96) hours, in the aggregate, for a correlation test,

including all runs of all test conditions. (§63.1206(b)(8)(v))

• The permittee must return to operating conditions indicative of compliance with the applicable

particulate matter and opacity standards as soon as possible after correlation testing is

completed. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vii))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-006 (40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-015 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

Test Methods:

• The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• If the permittee determines compliance with the opacity standard under the monitoring

requirements of §63.1209(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(1)(v), the permittee must use Method 9, provided in

Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1208(b)(9))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 148

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• COMS – For cement kilns, except as provided by §63.1209(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(1)(v), the permittee

must use a COMS to demonstrate and monitor compliance with the opacity standard under

§§63.1204(a)(7) and (b)(7) at each point where emissions are vented form these affected

sources including the bypass stack of a preheater or preheater/precalciner kiln with dual

stacks. (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii))

(1) The permittee must maintain and operate each COMS in accordance with the requirements

of §63.8(c) except for the requirements under §63.8(c)(3). The requirements of §63.1211(d)

shall be complied with instead of §63.8(c)(3); and (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii)(A))

(2) Compliance is based on six (6)-minute block average. (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii)(B))

• COMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate the CEMS

and COMS in compliance with the quality assurance procedures provided in the appendix to

this subpart and Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60.

(§63.1209(a)(2))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c)

apply except: (§63.1209(f))

(1) Sections 63.8(c)(4)(i), (c)(5) and (c)(7)(i)(C) pertaining to COMS apply only to owners and

operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns. (§63.1209(f)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the COMs; (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of all calibration records obtained during compliance

with the quality assurance procedures provide in the appendix to this subpart and

Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures provided in the

appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR

Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 149

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-016

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Destruction and Removal Efficiency (DRE) – Principal Organic Hazardous

Constituent

Emission Limitation:

• Except as provided in §63.1204(c)(2), the permittee must achieve a destruction and removal

efficiency (DRE) of 99.99% for each principle organic hazardous constituent (POHC) designated

under §63.1204(c)(3). The permittee must calculate DRE for each POHC from the following

equation: DRE = [ ] 1− ( ) Wout Win ×100%

Where:

Win = mass feedrate of one (1) POHC in a waste feedstream; and

Wout = mass emission rate of the same POHC present in exhaust emissions prior to

release to the atmosphere. (63.1204(c)(1))

• If the permittee burns the dioxin-listed hazardous wastes FO20, FO21, FO22, FO23, FO26 or

FO27 (see §261.31 of this Chapter), the permittee must achieve a DRE of 99.9999% for each

POHC that the permittee designates under §63.1204(c)(3). The permittee must demonstrate

this DRE performance on POHCs that are more difficult to incinerate that tetro-, penta-, and

hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. The permittee must use the equation in

§63.1204(c)(1) to calculate DRE for each POHC. In addition, the permittee must notify the

Administrator of the intent to incinerate hazardous wastes FO20, FO21, FO22, FO23, FO26 or

FO27. (§63.1204(c)(2))

• The permittee must treat the POHCs in the waste feed that are specified under

§63.1204(c)(3)(ii) to the extent required by §63.1204(c)(1) and §63.1204(c)(2). (§63.1204(c)(3)(i))

• The permittee must specify one (1) or more POHCs from the list of hazardous air pollutants

established by 42 U.S.C. 7412(b)(1), excluding caprolactam (CAS number 105602) as provided

by §63.60, for each waste to be burned. The permittee must base this specification on the

degree of difficulty of incineration of the organic constituents in the waste and on their

concentration or mass in the waste feed, considering the results of waste analyses or other

data and information. (§63.1204(c)(3)(ii))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.

Operating Parameters:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 150

Project No. 031-0021-023

• To remain in compliance with the DRE standard, the permittee must establish operating limits

during the comprehensive performance test (or during a previous DRE test under provisions of

§63.1206(b)(7)) for the following parameters, unless the limits are based on manufacturer

specifications and comply with those limits at all times that hazardous waste remains in the

combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste residence time has not transpired since the

hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated): (§63.1209(j))

(1) Minimum combustion chamber temperature: (§63.1209(j)(1))

(i) The permittee must measure the temperature of each combustion chamber at a location

that best represents, as practicable, the bulk gas temperature in the combustion zone.

The permittee must document the temperature measurement location in the test plan

the permittee submits under §63.1207(e); (§63.1209(j)(1)(i))

(ii) The permittee must establish a minimum hourly rolling average limit as the average of

the test run averages; (§63.1209(j)(1)(ii))

(2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(j)(2))

(i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device the permittee must establish

and comply with a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production

rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as

an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly

rolling averages for each run; (§63.1209(j)(2)(i))

(ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis;

(§63.1209(j)(2)(ii))

(3) Maximum hazardous waste feedrate: (§63.1209(j)(3))

(i) The permittee must establish limits on the maximum pumpable and total (i.e.,

pumpable and nonpumpable) hazardous waste feedrate for each location where

hazardous waste is fed; (§63.1209(j)(3)(I))

(ii) The permittee must establish the limits as the average of the maximum hourly rolling

averages for each run. (§63.1209(j)(3)(ii))

(iii) The permittee must comply with the feedrate limit(s) on a hourly rolling average basis;

(§63.1209(j)(3)(iii))

• The permittee must specify operating parameters and limits to ensure that good operation of

each hazardous waste firing system is maintained. (§63.1209(j)(4)

Test Methods:

The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission

standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use applicable test methods in EPA Publication SW-846, as incorporated

by reference in §63.1208(a), as necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements of this

subpart, except as otherwise specified in §63.1208(b)(2) – (b)(6). (§63.1208(b)(7))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations

of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure

that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are

representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that:

(§63.1208(b)(8))

(1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper

confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

(2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported

level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for

Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January

1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 151

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• Except as provided in §63.1206(b)(7)(ii) and (b)(7)(iii), The permittee: (§63.1206(b)(7)(i))

(1) Must document compliance with the DRE standard under §§63.1203 through 63.1205 only

once provided that you do not modify the source after the DRE test in a manner that could

affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard; and (§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A))

(2) May use DRE testing performed after March 30, 1998 for purposes of issuance or reissuance

of a RCRA permit under Part 270 of this Chapter to document conformance with the DRE

standard if the permittee has not modified the design or operation of the source since the

DRE test in a manner that could affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard.

(§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(B))

• For sources that feed hazardous waste at a location in the combustion system other than the

normal flame zone, the permittee: (§63.1206(b)(7)(ii))

(1) Must demonstrate compliance with the DRE standard during each comprehensive

performance test; and (§63.1206(b)(7)(ii)(A))

(2) May use DRE testing performed after March 30, 1998 for purposes of issuance or reissuance

of a RCRA permit under Part 270 of this Chapter to document conformance with the DRE

standard if the permittee has not modified the design or operation of the source since the

DRE test in a manner that could affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard.

(§63.1206(b)(7)(ii)(B))

• For sources that do not use DRE testing performed prior to the compliance date to document

conformance with the DRE standard, the permittee must perform DRE testing during the

initial comprehensive performance test. (§63.1206(b)(7)(iii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling

average; (§63.1209(j)(2))

• The permittee shall monitor the pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable)

hazardous waste feedrates on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(j)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor the key parameters for the hazardous waste firing system;

(§63.1209(j)(4)

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the

weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every

three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 152

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following:

(1) The temperature in each combustion chamber; (§63.1209(j)(1))

(2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(j)(2))

(3) The pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable) hazardous waste feedrates;

(§63.1209(j)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain records on the key parameters for the hazardous waste firing

system; (§63.1209(j)(4)

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall

immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources

personnel upon verbal request
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 153

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-017

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste

Combustors – Cement kilns with in-line kiln raw mills – General

Performance Testing:

• The permittee must conduct performance testing when the raw mill is on-line and when the

mill is off-line to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards. (§63.1204(d)(1)(i))

Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must establish separate operating parameter limits under §63.1209 for each

mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(i))

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the

requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to

this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste

feed and the method of compliance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 154

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee must establish rolling averages for the operating parameter limits anew (i.e.,

without considering previous recordings) when you begin complying with the operating limits

for the alternate mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(iii))

• The permittee may comply with the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and

hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards on a time-weighted average basis under

the following procedures (§63.1204(d)(2)):

• The permittee must calculate the time-weighted average emission concentration with the

following equation:

( ) ( ) 









 



	 






+ + × 









 



	 






+ = × − −

− − − −

− − mill off mill on

mill on mill on mill off mill on

mill off total mill off T T C T

T T

T C C

Where:

Ctotal = time-weighted average concentration of a regulated constituent considering both

raw mill on time and off time

Cmill-off = average performance test concentration of regulated constituent with the raw

mill off-line

Cmill-on = average performance test concentration of regulated constituent with the raw

mill on-line

Tmill-off = time when kiln gases are not routed through the raw mill

Tmill-on = time when kiln gases are routed through the raw mill (§63.1204(d)(2)(i))

• Compliance: (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii))

(1) If the permittee uses the emission averaging provision, the permittee must document in the

operating record compliance with the emission standards on an annual basis by using the

equation provided in §63.1204(d)(2). (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(A))

(2) Compliance is based on one (1)-year block averages beginning on the day the permittee

submits the initial notification of compliance. (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(B))

• The permittee must include historical raw mill operation data in the performance test plan to

estimate future raw mill down-time and document in the performance test plan that estimated

emissions and estimated raw mill down-time will not result in an exceedance of an emission

standard on an annual basis. (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(B))

• The permittee must document in the notification of compliance submitted under §63.1207(j)

that an emission standard will not be exceeded based on the document emissions from the

performance test and predicted raw mill down-time. (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(C))

CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure

transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating

parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate

continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that

requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written

specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system:

(§63.1209(b)(2))

(1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once

every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i))

(2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g.,

activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the

weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every

three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 155

Project No. 031-0021-023

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector

response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at

least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock

the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3).

(§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5))

(1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by

12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)-

minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty

(60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven

hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour

rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i))

(2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for

calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the

first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling

average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the

permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the

hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not

resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit.

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A))

(ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet

the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non

hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste).

(§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether

the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

Record keeping:

• The permittee must document in the operating record each time the installation changes from

one (1) mode of operation to the alternate mode and begin complying with the operating

parameter limits for the alternate mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(ii))

• If the permittee uses the emission averaging provision, the permittee must document in the

operating record compliance with the emission standards on an annual basis by using the

equation provided in §63.1204(d)(2). (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(A))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring

systems.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to

the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping

requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 156

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the permittee elects to document compliance with one (1) or more emission standards using

this emission averaging provision, the permittee must notify the Administrator in the initial

comprehensive performance test plan submitted under §63.1207(e). (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(A))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting

requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary

report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the

terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative

defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance

of this regulation.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the

installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075

or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

EU0520 and EU0530

EU0520 – Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601

RU0530 – Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602

General Description: Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601

2 Dust Collectors

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #15 Special Air Heater

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02B (1999)

General Description: Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602

2 Dust Collectors

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #15 Special Air Heater

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02B (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0520-001 and EU0530-001

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per

million by volume (five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv)) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35

mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more

than 0.5% weight sulfur.

Monitoring:

None

Record keeping:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 157

Project No. 031-0021-023

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR

10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

Permit Conditions EU0520-002 and EU0530-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw mill

heaters any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))

• Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with

§60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions

discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall

be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If

there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install,

calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack

in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))

• For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported

are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed

by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates.

Attachment E, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance

with this requirement.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

• Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall

submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must

comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such

reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a))

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 158

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0540 through EU0810

EU0540 – Raw Blend Silo B-0701

EU0550 – Raw Blend Silo B-0702

EU0560 – Raw Blend Silo B-0703

EU0570 – Raw Blend Silo B-0704

EU0580 – Transfer Belt KB-1200

EU0590 – Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600

EU0600 – Air Slide KB-1808

EU0610 – Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700

EU0620 – Truck Loading KB-3821

EU0630 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3800

EU0640 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3900

EU0650 – Drag Conveyor KC-501

EU0660 – Drag Conveyor KC-502

EU0670 – Elevator KC-0601

EU0680 – Elevator KC-0602

EU0690 – Truck Loading

EU0700 – Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100

EU0710 – Clinker Storage Pile Farm

EU0720 – Clinker Storage Pile Farm(Enclosed)

EU0730 – Hopper Loading W-9200

EU0740 – Transfer Belt W-7900

EU0750 – Transfer Belt W-8200

EU0760 – Transfer Belt KC-1000

EU0770 – Diverter Box KC-0603

EU0780 – Clinker Bin W-6601

EU0790 – Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4)

EU0800 – Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5)

EU0810 – Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0701

Dust Collector B-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999)

CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0702

Dust Collector B-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999)

CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0703

Dust Collector B-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 159

Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999)

CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0704

Dust Collector B-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999)

CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-1200

Dust Collector B-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03B (1999)

CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600

Dust Collector KB-2600

Manufacturer/Model #: Bernnard Beumer, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04A (1999)

CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Air Slide KB-1808

Dust Collector KB-2600

Manufacturer/Model #: Milltronics Limited, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04B (1999)

CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700

Dust Collector KB-2600

Manufacturer/Model #: Milltronics Limited, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04C (1999)

CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading KB-3821

Dust Collector KB-3801

Manufacturer/Model #: Ashtech Corp, M-16

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07A (1999)

CD-KP07 (1999)

General Description: CKD Storage Silo KB-3800

Dust Collector KB-3801

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07B (1999)

CD-KP07 (1999)

General Description: CKD Storage Silo KB-3900

Dust Collector KB-3901

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07C (1999)

CD-KP07 (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 160

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Drag Conveyor KC-501

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP10 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor KC-502

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP10 (1999)

General Description: Elevator KC –0601

Dust Collector KC-0800

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., #1618-05M

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP11A (1999)

CD-KP11 (1999)

General Description: Elevator KC-0602

Dust Collector KC-0800

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., #1618-05M

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP11B (1999)

CD-KP11 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP12 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100

Dust Collector

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corporation, Custom Made

ECS-135C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP13 (1999)

CD-KP13A (1999)

General Description: Clinker Storage Pile Farm

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP14A (1999)

General Description: Clinker Storage Pile Farm(Enclosed)

Process Enclosed

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP14B (1999)

CD-KP14 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Loading W-9200

Process Enclosed

Dust Collector W-9400

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

Amerex-PR-10-360

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15A (1999)

CD-KP15 (1999)

CD-KP15 (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 161

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt W-7900

Dust Collector W-9400

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

Amerex-PR-10-360

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15B (1999)

CD-KP15 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-8200

Dust Collector W-8900

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

Flex-Kleen-84WRBS

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15C (1999)

CD-KP15A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-1000

Dust Collector W-7200

Manufacturer/Model #: Custom Systems Inc., Custom Made

Flex-Kleen-84WRBS

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16A (1999)

CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Diverter Box KC-0603

Dust Collector W-7200

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

Flex-Kleen-84WRBS

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16B (1999)

CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Bin W-6601

Dust Collector W-7200

Manufacturer/Model #: Penta Engineering Corp, Custom Made

Flex-Kleen-84WRBS

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16C (1999)

CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4)

Dust Collector KC-1300

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17A (1999)

CD-KP17 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5)

Dust Collector KC-1300

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17B (1999)

CD-KP17 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 162

Project No. 031-0021-023

Dust Collector KC-1300

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17C (1999)

CD-KP17 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0540-001 through EU0570-001

EU0600-001 through EU0610-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0540 through EU0570;

• 63.0 lbs/hr form EU0600 through EU0610.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the emission units are

operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 163

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0580-001 through EU0590-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0580;

• 63.0 lbs/hr form EU0590.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the emission units are

operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM10 from the transfer belt identified as EU0590 to less

than 0.6 lbs/hour. (Special Condition #1)

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM10 from the raw blend elevator identified as EU0600

to less than 0.6 lbs/hr. (Special Condition #2)

Performance Testing:

• Within sixty (60) days of achieving full production, but in no case later than one hundred

eighty (180) days after permit issuance, an emission test shall be conducted to demonstrate

compliance with Special Conditions No. 1 through 4 of Construction Permit Number: 1197-

012A. For Special Conditions No. 1 and 2, these tests shall determine the total PM10 emission

rate (filterable and condensable) from the emission units identified in said conditions. All tests

required by this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the Stack Test Procedures

outlined in Special Conditions No. 6 through 8. (Special Condition #5)

• Performance testing shall be conducted under the condition of maximum process/production

rate, or within ten percent (10%) of this rated capacity. The process/production rate at which

performance testing is conducted shall become the maximum process/production rate at

which this source of emissions is permitted to operate under the authority granted by this

permit. (Special Condition #8)

Monitoring:

• As required by the Performance Test.

Record keeping:

• As required by the Performance Test

Reporting:

• A completed Proposed Test Plan Form must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program

thirty (30) days prior to the proposed test date so that this program may arrange a pretest

meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observer to be present.

The Proposed Test Plan must be approved by the Director of the Missouri Air Pollution Control

Program prior to conducting the required emission testing. (Special Condition #6)

• Two (2) copies of a report of the performance test results shall be submitted to the Director of

the APCP within thirty (30) days of completion of any required testing. The report must

include legible copies of the raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data and

complete sample calculations from the required EPA Method for at least one sample run.

(Special Condition #7)

• The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 164

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0620-001 through EU0700-001

EU0730-001 through EU0810-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 40.0 lbs/hr from EU0620;

• 12.0 lbs/hr from EU0630 and EU0640;

• 57.1 lbs/hr from EU0650 through EU0690;

• 58.51 lbs/hr from EU0700;

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0730 through EU0810.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and

not the aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 165

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0540-002 through EU0610-002

EU0650-002 through EU0660-002

EU0700-002

EU0710-001 through EU0720-001

EU0730-002 through EU0810-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material

storage and conveyor transfer point any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or

greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 166

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0540-003 through EU0610-003

EU0620-002 through EU0640-002

EU0650-003 through EU0660-003

EU0670-002 through EU0690-002

EU0730-003 through EU0810-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and

conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material,

clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point which exhibit

opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material, clinker, or

finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a

test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test

shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material, clinker, or finished

product storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest load or

capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity

exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material, clinker,

or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours

(thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test

may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii)

apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 167

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 168

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0820 through EU1030

EU0820 – Transfer Belt KC-2600

EU0830 – Transfer Belt KC–2620

EU0840 – Clinker Silo KC–2901

EU0850 – Clinker Silo KC–2902

EU0860 – Clinker Silo KC–2903

EU0870 – Transfer Belt KC–2630

EU0880 – Weigh Feeder KC–3002

EU0890 – Weigh Feeder KC–3005

EU0900 – Weigh Feeder KC–3008

EU0910 – Transfer Belt KC–3200

EU0920 – Bucket Elevator KC–3400

EU0930 – Bucket Elevator KC–2550

EU0940 – Transfer Belt KC–3600

EU0950 – Truck Loading

EU0960 – Hopper TL-5000

EU0970 – Transfer Belt TL-5300

EU0980 – Transfer Belt TL-5500

EU0990 – Barge Loading

EU1000 – Drag Conveyor F-8701

EU1010 – Drag Conveyor F-12701

EU1020 – Elevator F-8702

EU1030 – Elevator F-12702

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2600

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2620

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2901

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2902

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2903

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 169

Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2630

Dust Collector KC-2800

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999)

CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3002

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick

American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3005

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick

American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3008

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick

American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-3200

Dust Collector KC-3300

Manufacturer/Model #: American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19A (1999)

CD-KP19 (1999)

General Description: Bucket Elevator KC-3400

Dust Collector KC-3300

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnord

American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19A (1999)

CD-KP19 (1999)

General Description: Bucket Elevator KC-2550

Dust Collector KC-2560

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnord

American Baghouse

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP21 (1999)

CD-KP21 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-3600

Dust Collector KC-3450

Manufacturer/Model #: American Baghouse
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 170

Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP20 (1999)

CD-KP20 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP 23 (1999)

General Description: Hopper TL-5000

Dust Collector TL-5100

Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made

Ecolaire-900-5

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25A (1999)

CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt TL-5300

Dust Collector TL-5100

Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made

Ecolaire-900-5

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25 (1999)

CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt TL-5500

Dust Collector TL-5100

Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made

Ecolaire-900-5

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25 (1999)

CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Barge Loading

Dust Collector TL-5600

Manufacturer/Model #: Eemco-Delta/Mark 11-8

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP26 (1999)

CD-KP26 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor F-8701

Dust Collector FO-0110

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01A (1999)

CD-FM1 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor F-12701

Dust Collector FO-0110

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01B (1999)

CD-RM1 (1999)

General Description: Elevator F-8702

Dust Collector FO-0110

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01C (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 171

Project No. 031-0021-023

CD-FM1 (1999)

General Description: Elevator F-12702

Dust Collector FO-0110

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01D (1999)

CD-FM1 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0820-001 through EU0940-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0496-007)

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of

• 63.0 lbs/hr from EU0820 through EU0940.

• All five (5) baghouse must be in use at all times when the clinker conveyor system is in

operation, and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s

specifications. Each baghouse shall be equipped with a gauge or meter which indicates the

pressure drop across the baghouse. This gauge or meter shall be located such that it may be

easily observed by the Department of Natural Resources’ employees. Replacement bags for the

baghouses shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers appropriate for

operating conditions expected to occur (i.e., temperature limits, acidic and alkali resistance

and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #1)

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall monitor the operating pressure drop across each baghouse at least once

every twenty-four hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained within the design

conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special Condition #2)

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across each baghouse at

least once every twenty-four hours. Attachment I, or an equivalent created by the permittee,

must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Special Condition #2)

• The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for each baghouse which shall

include the following:

(1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and

correction actions; and

(2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements (Special

Condition #3)

Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify

compliance with this requirement.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 172

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0950-001 through EU1030-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0950 through EU0990.

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1000 through EU1030

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0820-002 through EU0940-002

EU0960-002 through EU0990-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the conveyor

transfer point and clinker storage any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or

greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 173

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 174

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0820-003 through EU0940-003

EU0950-002

EU0960-003 through EU0990-003

EU1000-002 through EU1030-002

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point shall

not cause to be discharged any gases from clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer

point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the clinker storage bin and

conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method

9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the

conditions that exist when the clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point is

operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six

(6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether

the clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the

standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30)

six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 175

Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 176

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1040 through EU1520

EU1040 – Finish Mill F-12900

EU1050 – Finish Mill F-8900

EU1060 – Separator F-13500

EU1070 – Separator F-9500

EU1080 – Hopper for Finish Mill #4

EU1090 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #4

EU1100 – Hopper for Finish Mill #5

EU1110 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #5

EU1120 – New Cement Silo 37

EU1130 – New Cement Silo 38

EU1140 – New Cement Silo 39

EU1150 – New Cement Silo 40

EU1160 – New Cement Silo 41

EU1170 – New Cement Silo 42

EU1180 – New Cement Silo 43

EU1190 – New Cement Silo 44

EU1200 – New Cement Silo 45

EU1210 – New Cement Silo 46

EU1220 – Old Cement Silo 21

EU1230 – Old Cement Silo 22

EU1240 – Old Cement Silo 23

EU1250 – Old Cement Silo 24

EU1260 – Old Cement Silo 25

EU1270 – Old Cement Silo 26

EU1280 – Old Cement Silo 27

EU1290 – Old Cement Silo 28

EU1300 – Old Cement Silo 29

EU1310 – Old Cement Silo 30

EU1320 – Old Cement Silo 31

EU1330 – Old Cement Silo 32

EU1340 – Old Cement Silo 33

EU1350 – Old Cement Silo 34

EU1360 – Old Cement Silo 35

EU1370 – Old Cement Silo 36

EU1380 – River Cement Silo 47

EU1390 – River Cement Silo 48

EU1400 – River Cement Silo 49

EU1410 – Cement Transfer Belt D-4800

EU1420 – Cement Transfer Belt

EU1430 – Transfer Belt D-4100

EU1440 – Transfer Belt D-4200

EU1450 – Barge Loading TL-0800

EU1460 – Distribution Box D-6900

EU1470 – Elevator TL-0400

EU1480 – Air Slide

EU1490 – Cement Bins (Truck)

EU1500 – Truck Loading

EU1510 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500

EU1520 – Truck Unloading
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 177

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Finish Mill F-12900

Dust Collector

Mill Cyclone

Manufacturer/Model #: A.C. S/N B-04551-B

ECS-405-10 F-102-00/14

F-102-021/142-02

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM02 (1999)

CD-FM2 (1999)

CD-FM2A (1999)

General Description: Finish Mill F-8900

Dust Collector

Mill Cyclone

Manufacturer/Model #: A.C. S/N B-04551-1

ECS-405-10 F-102-00/114

F-102-02/142-02

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM02A (1999)

CD-FM2 (1999)

CD-FM2A (1999)

General Description: Separator F-13500

Dust Collector F-103-00

Dust Collector F-143-00

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-675-10

ECS-0405-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03A1 (1999)

CD-FM3A (1999)

CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: Separator F-9500

Dust Collector F-103-00

Dust Collector F-143-00

Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-675-10

ECS-0405-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03A2 (1999)

CD-FM3A (1999)

CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: Hopper/Air Slide for Finish Mill #4

Dust Collector F-103-00

Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-675-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03B1 (1999)

CD-FM3A (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 178

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Hopper/Air Slide for Finish Mill #5

Dust Collector F-143-00

Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-405-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03B2 (1999)

CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: New Cement Silos 37-46

Dust Collectors F-153-01 & 03

Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineering, Custom Made

ECS-81C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM04 (1999)

CD-FM4 (1999)

CD-FM4A (1999)

General Description: Old Cement Silos (21-36)

Dust Collector L-3200

Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made

Norblo-970-64-8A

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM06 (1999)

CD-FM6 (1999)

General Description: River Cement Silos (47-48)

Dust Collector D-5400

Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-19

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM09 (1999)

CD-FM9 (1999)

General Description: River Cement Silos (49)

Dust Collector D-5500

Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM09A (1999)

CD-FM9A (1999)

General Description: Cement Transfer Belt D-4800

Dust Collector D-4300

Dust Collector D-4303

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-81C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM05 (1999)

CD-FM5 (1999)

CD-FM5A (1999)

General Description: Cement Transfer Belt

Dust Collector D-4300

Dust Collector D-4303

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-81C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM05A (1999)

CD-FM5 (1999)

CD-FM5A (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 179

Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt D-4100

Dust Collector D-4500

Dust Collector D-4503

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-64C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM07 (1999)

CD-FM7 (1999)

CD-FM7A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt D-4200

Dust Collector D-4500

Dust Collector D-4503

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-64C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM07A (1999)

CD-FM7 (1999)

CD-FM7A (1999)

General Description: Barge Loading TL-0800

Dust Collector TL-0900

Manufacturer/Model #: Fuller Co., Custom Made

ECS-108C-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM10 (1999)

CD-FM10 (1999)

General Description: Distribution Box D-6900

Dust Collector TL-0600

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-108-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08A (1999)

CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Elevator TL-0400

Dust Collector TL-0600

Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., 1630-4C

ECS-108-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08B (1999)

CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Air Slide

Dust Collector TL-0600

Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-108-10

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08C (1999)

CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Cement Bins (Truck)

Dust Collector D-7000

Dust Collector L-0130

Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made

DEC Vokes-DLM 1/3/10
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 180

Project No. 031-0021-023

Norblo-68-2

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM11 (1999)

CD-FM11 (1999)

CD-FM11A (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading

Dust Collector D-6101

Dust Collector L-0190

Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made

DEC Vokes-DLM 1/3/10

Pulse Jet

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM12 (1999)

CD-FM12 (1999)

CD-FM12A (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500

Dust Collector W-8400

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-36C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM13 (1999)

CD-FM13 (1999)

General Description: Truck Unloading

Dust Collector W-8400

Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-9

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM13 (1999 EIQ)

Permit Condition EU1040-001 through EU1070 and

EU1380-001 through EU1500-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1040 through EU1070;

• 66.3 lbs/hr from EU1380 through EU1400;

• 74.7 lbs/hr from EU1410 through EU1440 and EU1480;

• 77.6 lbs/hr from EU1450 through EU1470;

• 61 lbs/hr from EU1490 through EU1500.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the finish mill is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the finish mill, hopper/air

slide, cement silos, transfer belt, barge loading distribution box, elevator, air slide, cement

bins or truck loading are operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 181

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• Dust Collector operation and maintenance:

(1) Check and document the fabric filter pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken

within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

(2) Check the cleaning sequence of the fabric filter monthly.

(3) Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

(4) Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacture specifications.

Record keeping:

The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection. Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee,

must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made

available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon

request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Condition EU1080-001 through EU1370-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1080 through EU1110 and EU1220 through EU1370;

• 54.7 lbs/hr from EU1120 through EU1210;

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the hopper/air slide or cement

silos are operational.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None

Record keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU1510-001 and EU1520-001

10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 182

Project No. 031-0021-023

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 44.6 lbs/hr from EU1510 through EU1520.

Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the

aggregated sources.

Monitoring:

None.

Record keeping:

None.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 183

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1040-002 through EU1070-002

EU1410-002 through EU1450-002

EU1510-002 through EU1520-002

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the finish mill

system any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this

permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the

Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity

limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity

exceedance.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 184

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU1080-002 through EU1400-002

EU1410-003 through EU1450-003

EU1460-002 through EU1500-002

EU1510-003 through EU1520-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each storage bin and conveying system transfer point shall not cause

to be discharged any gases from storage bin and conveying system transfer point which exhibit

opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with storage bin and conveying

system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of

Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions

that exist when the storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest

load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average

opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the storage bin

and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration

of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages),

except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if

the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 185

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual

test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR

Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002

unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 186

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1040-003 through EU1070-003

10 CSR 10-6.075

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep

or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent (10%). (§63.1347)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit by

conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The

performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish mill is

operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six

(6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether

the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9

performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour

period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill or finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily

visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60.

The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest

load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method

22 test shall be six (6) minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible

emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

(1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and

maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

(2) Within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions

were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60. The duration of the

Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 187

Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

(5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on

site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be

maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are

federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply

early with the MACT standard.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved

SIP as a final EPA action.

EU1530 through EU1600

EU1530 – Blend Tank

EU1540 – Blend Tank

EU1550 – Blend Tank

EU1560 – Blend Tank

EU1570 – Burn Tank

EU1580 – Burn Tank

EU1590 – Holding Tank

EU1600 – Mixing Tank

General Description: Blend Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF1000-06

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3A (1999)

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF4000-04

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3A (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 188

Project No. 031-0021-023

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF5000-02

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3A (1999)

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF2000-05

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3A (1999)

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Burn Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF5000-03

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3C (1999)

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Burn Tank

Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF6000

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999)

CD-AF3A (1999)

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Mixing Tank

Building Vent to Kiln

Manufacturer/Model #: Shar Systems, ESH 1000 TFZ

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF5 (1999)

CD-AF5A (1999)

General Description: Holding Tank

Building Vent to Kiln

Manufacturer/Model #: Shar Systems, EBH 750/300

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF7 (1999)

CD-AF7A (1999)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 189

Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1530-001 through EU1580-001

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb

Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum

Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification

Commenced after July 23, 1984

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall equip the storage tank with a closed vent system and control device

meeting the following specifications: (§60.112b(a)(3))

(1) The closed vent system shall be designed to collect all VOC vapors and gases discharged

from the storage vessel and operated with no detectable emissions as indicated by an

instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million (500 ppm) above background

and visual inspections, as determined in Part 60, Subpart VV, §60.485(b). (§60.112b(a)(3)(i))

(2) The control device shall be designed and operated to reduce inlet VOC emissions by 95

percent or greater. If a flare is used as the control device, it shall meet the specifications

described in the general control device requirements (§60.18) of the General Provisions.

(§60.112b(a)(3)(ii))

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall continuously monitor the HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the

carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln. (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

• The permittee shall obtain a daily reading and recording of the HC concentration in ppm from

the exit of the carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln. The carbon cannister control device

shall be changed prior to break through. (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep the following records. (§60.115b(c))

(1) A copy of the operating plan. (§60.115b(c)(1))

(2) A daily record of the continuously monitored HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the

carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

(3) A record of the carbon cannister changes (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available immediately

for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request or to the

Director upon written request.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 190

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee is exempt from §60.8 of the General Provisions and shall meet the following

requirements. (§60.113b(c))

• Submit for approval by the Administrator as an attachment to the notification required by

§60.7(a)(1) or, if the facility is exempt from §60.7(a)(1), as an attachment to the notification

required by §60.7(a)(2), an operating plan containing the information listed below.

(§60.113b(c)(1))

(1) Documentation demonstrating that the control device will achieve the required control

efficiency during maximum loading conditions. This documentation is to include a

description of the gas stream which enters the control device, including flow and VOC

content under varying liquid level conditions (dynamic and static) and manufacturer’s

design specifications for the control device. If the control device or the closed vent capture

system receives vapors, gases, or liquids other than fuels from sources that are not

designated sources under this subpart, the efficiency demonstration is to include

consideration of all vapors, gases, and liquids received by the closed vent capture system

and control device. If an enclosed combustion device with a minimum residence time of

0.75 seconds and a minimum temperature of 816°C is used to meet the 95 percent

requirement, documentation that those conditions will exist is sufficient to meet the

requirements of this paragraph. (§60.113b(c)(1)(i))

(2) A description of the parameter or parameters to be monitored to ensure that the control

device will be operated in conformance with its design and an explanation of the criteria

used for selection of that parameter (or parameters). (§60.113b(c)(1)(ii))

Permit Conditions EU1530-002 through EU1580-002

EU1590-001 and EU1600-001

10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF

National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations

Emission Limitation:

• For each waste stream that contains benzene, including (but not limited to ) organic waste

streams that contain less than ten percent (10%) water and aqueous waste stream, even if the

wastes are not discharged to an individual drain system, the permittee shall: (§61.342(c)(1))

(1) Remove or destroy the benzene contained in the waste using a treatment process or

wastewater treatment system that complies with the standards specified in §61.348.

(§61.342(c)(1)(i))

(2) Comply with the standards specified in §§61.343 through 61.347 for each waste

management unit that receives or manages the waste stream prior to and during treatment

of the waste stream in accordance with §61.342(c)(1)(i). (§61.342(c)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall install, operate and maintain a fixed-roof and closed-vent system that

routes all organic vapors vented from the tank to a control device. (§61.343(a)(1))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 191

Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

• The fixed-roof shall meet the following requirements: (§61.343(a)(1)(i))

(1) The cover and all openings (e.g., access hatches, sampling ports and gauge wells) shall be

designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading of

less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above background, as

determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in

§61.355(h). (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(A))

(2) Each opening shall be maintained in a closed, sealed position (e.g., covered by a lid that is

gasketed and latched) at all times that waste is in the tank except when it is necessary to

use the opening for waste sampling or removal, or for equipment inspection, maintenance,

or repair. (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(B))

(3) If the cover and closed-vent system operate such that the tank is maintained at a pressure

less than atmospheric pressure, then §61.343(a)(1)(i)(B) does not apply to any opening that

meets all of the following conditions: (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C))

(i) The purpose of the opening is to provide dilution air to reduce the explosion hazard;

(§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(1))

(ii) The opening is designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an

instrument reading of less than 500 ppmv above background, as determined initially

and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in §61.355(h); and

(§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(2))

(iii) The pressure is monitored continuously to ensure that the pressure in the tank remains

below atmospheric pressure. (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(3))

• The closed-vent system and control device shall be designed and operated in accordance with

the requirements of §61.349. (§61.343(a)(1)(ii))

• The closed-vent system shall: (§61.349(a)(1))

(1) Be designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading

of less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above background, as

determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in

§61.355(h). (§61.349(a)(1)(i))

(2) Vent systems that contain any bypass line that could divert the vent stream away from a

control device used to comply with the provisions of this subpart shall install, maintain, and

operate according to the manufacturer’s specifications a flow indicator that provides a record

of vent stream flow away from the control device at least once every fifteen (15) minutes,

except as provided in §61.349(a)(1)(ii)(B). (§61.349(a)(1)(ii))

(i) The flow indicator shall be installed at the entrance to any bypass line that could divert

the vent stream away from the control device to the atmosphere. (§61.349(a)(1)(ii)(A))

(ii) Where the bypass line valve is secured in the closed position with a car-seal or a lockand-key type configuration, a flow indicator is not required. (§61.349(a)(1)(ii)(B))

(3) All gauging and sampling devices shall be gas-tight except when gauging or sampling is

taking place. (§61.349(a)(1)(iii))

(4) For each closed-vent system complying with §61.349(a), one (1) or more devices which vent

directly to the atmosphere may be used on the closed-vent system provided each device

remains in a closed, sealed position during normal operations except when the device needs

to open to prevent physical damage or permanent deformation of the closed-vent system

resulting from malfunction of the unit in accordance with good engineering and safety

practices for handling flammable, explosive, or other hazardous materials. (§61.349(a)(1)(iv))

• The control device shall be designed and operated in accordance with the following conditions:

A vapor recovery system (e.g., a carbon adsorption system or a condenser) shall recover or

control the organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-five weight percent (95%)

or greater, or shall recover or control the benzene emissions vented to it with an efficiency of

98 weight percent or greater. (§61.349(a)(2)) and (§61.349(a)(2)(ii))

• Each closed-vent system and control device used to comply with this subpart shall be

operated at all times when waste is placed in the waste management unit vented to the control

device except when maintenance or repair of the waste management unit cannot be completed

without a shutdown of the control device. (§61.349(b))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 192

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall demonstrate that the carbon adsorption system recovers or controls the

organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-five weight percent (95%) or greater,

or recovers or controls the benzene emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-eight

weight percent (98%) or greater by using one (1) of the following methods: (modified §61.349(c))

(1) Engineering calculations in accordance with requirements specified in §61.356(f); or

(§61.349(c)(1))

(2) Performance tests conducted using the test methods and procedures that meet the

requirements specified in §61.355. (§61.349(c)(2))

• The Administrator may request at any time the permittee demonstrate that the carbon

adsorption system recovers or controls the organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of

ninety-five weight percent (95%) or greater, or recovers or controls the benzene emissions

vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-eight weight percent (98%) or greater by conducting a

performance test using the test methods and procedures as required in §61.355. (§61.349(e))

• Each closed-vent system and control device shall be visually inspected initially and quarterly

thereafter. The visual inspection shall include inspection of ductwork and piping and

connections to covers and control devices for evidence of visible defects such as holes in

ductwork or piping and loose connections. (§61.349(f))

• Except as provided in §61.350, if visible defects are observed during an inspection, or if other

problems are identified, or if detectable emissions are measured, a first effort to repair the

closed-vent system and control device shall be made as soon as practicable but no later than

five (5) calendar days after detection. Repair shall be completed no later than fifteen (15)

calendar days after the emissions are detected or the visible defect is observed. (§61.349(g))

(1) Delay of repair of facilities or units that are subject to the provisions of this subpart will be

allowed if the repair is technically impossible without a complete or partial facility or unit

shutdown. (§61.350(a))

(2) Repair of such equipment shall occur before the end of the next facility or unit shutdown.

(§61.350(b))

• The permittee shall monitor the control device in accordance with §61.354. (§61.349(h))

• The permittee shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer’s

specifications a device to continuously monitor the control device operation as specified in the

following paragraphs, unless alternative monitoring procedures or requirements are approved

for that facility by the Administrator. The permittee shall inspect at least once each operating

day the data recorded by the monitoring equipment (e.g., temperature monitor or flow

indicator) to ensure that the control device is operating properly. (§61.354(c))

• For a carbon adsorption system that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on site in the

control device (e.g., a carbon cannister), either the concentration level of the organic

compounds or the concentration level of benzene in the exhaust vent stream from the carbon

adsorption system shall be monitored on a regular schedule, and the existing carbon shall be

replaced with fresh carbon immediately when carbon breakthrough is indicated. The device

shall be monitored on a daily basis or at intervals no greater than twenty percent (20%) of the

design carbon replacement interval, whichever is greater. As an alternative to conducting this

monitoring, an owner or operator may replace the carbon in the carbon adsorption system

with fresh carbon at a regular predetermined time interval that is less than the carbon

replacement interval that is determined by the maximum design flow rate and either the

organic concentration or the benzene concentration in the gas stream vented to the carbon

adsorption system. (§61.354(d))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 193

Project No. 031-0021-023

• Each permittee who uses a system for emission control that is maintained at a pressure less

than atmospheric pressure with openings to provide dilution air shall install, calibrate,

maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer’s specifications a device equipped with a

continuous recorder to monitor the pressure in the unit to ensure that it is less than

atmospheric pressure. (§61.354(g))

Record keeping:

• The permittee using control equipment in accordance with §§61.343 through 61.347 shall

maintain engineering design documentation for all control equipment that is installed on the

waste management unit. The documentation shall be retained for the life of the control

equipment. If a control device is used, then the permittee shall maintain the control device

records required by §61.356(f). (§61.356(d))

• The permittee using a closed-vent system and control device in accordance with §61.349 shall

maintain the following records. The documentation shall be retained for the life of the control

device. (§61.356(f))

(1) A statement signed and dated by the permittee certifying that the closed-vent system and

control device is designed to operate at the documented performance level when the waste

management unit vented to the control device is or would be operating at the highest load or

capacity expected to occur. (§61.356(f)(1))

(2) If engineering calculations are used to determine control device performance in accordance

with §61.349(c), then a design analysis for the control device that includes for example:

(§61.356(f)(2))

(i) Specifications, drawing, schematics, and piping and instrumentation diagrams

prepared by the permittee, or the control device manufacturer or vendor that describe

the control device design based on acceptable engineering texts. The design analysis

shall address the following vent stream characteristics and control device operating

parameters: (§61.356(f)(2)(i))

(A)For a carbon adsorption system that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on-site

in the control device, such as a carbon canister, the design analysis shall consider the

vent stream composition, constituent concentration, flow rate, relative humidity and

temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design exhaust vent stream

organic compound concentration level or the design exhaust vent stream benzene

concentration level, capacity of carbon bed, type and working capacity of activated

carbon used for carbon bed and design carbon replacement interval based on the

total carbon working capacity of the control device and source operating schedule.

(§61.356(f)(2)(i)(G))

(3) If performance tests are used to determine control device performance in accordance with

§61.349(c): (§61.356(f)(3))

(i) A description of how it is determined that the test is conducted when the waste

management unit or treatment process is operating at the highest load or capacity level.

This description shall include the estimated or design flow rate and organic content of

each vent stream and definition of the acceptable operating ranges of key process and

control parameter during the test program. (§61.356(f)(3)(i))

(ii) A description of the control device including the type of control device, control device

manufacturer’s name and model number, control device dimensions, capacity and

construction materials. (§61.356(f)(3)(ii))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 194

Project No. 031-0021-023

(iii) A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedures, including sampling and

monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring

frequency and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis. (§61.356(f)(3)(iii))

(iv) All test results. (§61.356(f)(3)(iv))

• The permittee shall maintain a record for each visual inspection required by §§61.343 through

61.347 that identifies a problem (such as a broken seal, gap or other problem) which could

result in benzene emissions. The record shall include the date of the inspection, waste

management unit and control equipment location where the problem is identified, a

description of the problem, a description of the corrective action taken and the date the

corrective action was completed. (§61.356(g))

• The permittee shall maintain a record for each test of not detectable emissions required by

§§61.343 through 61.347 and §61.349. The record shall include the following information:

date the test is performed, background level measured during test, and maximum

concentration indicated by the instrument reading measured for each potential leak interface.

If detectable emissions are measured at a leak interface, then the record shall also include the

waste management unit, control equipment, and leak interface location where detectable

emissions were measured, a description of the problem, a description of the corrective action

taken, and the date the corrective action was completed. (§61.356(h))

• For each control device, the permittee shall maintain documentation that includes the

following information regarding the control device operation: (§61.356(j))

(1) Dates of startup and shutdown of the closed-vent system and control device. (§61.356(j)(1))

(2) A description of the operating parameter (or parameters) to be monitored to ensure that the

control device will be operated in conformance with these standards and the control device’s

design specifications and an explanation of the criteria used for selection of the parameter

(or parameters). This documentation shall be kept for the life of the control device.

(§61.356(j)(2))

(3) Periods when the closed-vent system and control device are not operated as designed

including all periods and the duration when: (§61.356(j)(3))

(i) Any valve car-seal or closure mechanism required under §61.349(a)(1)(ii) is broken or

the by-pass line valve position has changed. (§61.356(j)(3)(i))

(ii) The flow monitoring devices required under §61.349(a)(1)(ii) indicate that vapors are not

routed to the control device as required. (§61.356(j)(3)(ii))

(4) If a carbon adsorber that is not regenerated directly on site in the control device is used,

then the permittee shall maintain records of dates and times when the control device is

monitored, when breakthrough is measured, and shall record the date and time when the

existing carbon in the control device is replaced with fresh carbon. (§61.356(j)(10))

• If a system is used for emission control that is maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric

pressure with openings to provide dilution air, then the permittee shall maintain records of the

monitoring device and records of all periods during which the pressure in the unit is operated

at a pressure that is equal to or greater than atmospheric pressure. (§61.356(m))
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 195

Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the total annual benzene quantity from facility waste is equal to or greater than ten (10)

Mg/yr, then the permittee shall submit to the Administrator the following reports: (§61.357(d))

(1) Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these

standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit

quarterly to the Administrator a certification that all of the required inspections have been

carried out in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. (§61.357(d)(6))

(2) Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these

standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit a

report quarterly to the Administrator that includes: (§61.357(d)(7))

(i) For a control device monitored in accordance with §61.354(c), each period of operation

monitored during which any of the following conditions occur, as applicable to the

control device: (§61.357(d)(7)(iv))

(A)Each three-(3) hour period of operation during which the average concentration of

organics or the average concentration of benzene in the exhaust gases from a carbon

adsorber is more than twenty percent (20%) greater than the design concentration

level of organics or benzene in the exhaust gas. (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(D))

(B) Each occurrence when the carbon in a carbon adsorber system that is regenerated

directly on site in the control device is not regenerated at the predetermined carbon

bed regeneration time. : (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(H))

(C) Each occurrence when the carbon in a carbon adsorber system that is not

regenerated directly on site in the control device is not replaced at the pre-determined

interval specified in §61.354(c). (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(I))

(ii) For a cover and closed-vent system monitored in accordance with §61.354(g), the

permittee shall submit a report quarterly to the Administrator that identifies any period

in which the pressure in the waste management unit is equal to or greater than

atmospheric pressure. (§61.357(d)(7)(v))

(3) Beginning one (1) year after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these

standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit

annually to the Administrator a report that summarizes all inspections required by

§§61.342 through 61.354 during which detectable emissions are measured or a problem

(such as a broken seal, gap or other problem) that could result in benzene emissions is

identified, including information about the repairs or corrective action taken. (§61.357(d)(8))

EU1610

Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading

General Description: Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading

Vent to Kiln

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SN 7724

EIQ Reference # (Year): AF8 (1999)

CD-AF8 (1999)

Permit Condition EU1610-001

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0693-009)

Emission Limitation:

The number of filters cleaned at this facility shall not exceed thirty five thousand (35,000) in

any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Special Condition #1)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 196

Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

The permittee shall monitor and keep track of the number of filters cleaned each month and

the consecutive twelve (12) month period.

Record keeping:

• The permittee must keep monthly records detailing the number of filters cleaned that month

and the previous twelve (12) month total. Records for the most recent five (5) years must be

kept at the facility. Attachment J, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to

certify compliance with this requirement. (modified Special Condition #2)

• Copies of all required records and of the permit shall be kept at the plant and shall be made

available immediately upon verbal request to Department of Natural Resources personnel.

(Special Condition #4)

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Program Enforcement Section, P.O.

Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176, no later than fifteen (15) days after the end of each

month if the twelve (12) month cumulative records (condition number 2) show that the

permittee exceeded the limitation of condition number 1. (modified Special Condition #3)

EU1620 through EU1630

EU1620 – Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 470 kW

EU1630 – Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 500 kW

General Description: Back Up Generators

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (Year): MS11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU1620-001 and EU1630-001

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per

million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35

mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more

than 0.5% weight sulfur.

Monitoring:

None

Record keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR

10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 197

Project No. 031-0021-023

IV. Core Permit Requirements

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR)

for the full text of the applicable requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Conditions

The permittee shall submit the following information to the director not later than

fifteen (15) days after receipt of the notice of excess emissions.

(a.) Name and location of installation;

(b.) Name and telephone number of person responsible for the installation;

(c.) The identity of the equipment causing the excess emissions;

(d.) The time and duration of the period of excess emissions.;

(e.) The cause of the excess emissions;

(f.) The type of air contaminant involved;

(g.) A best estimate of the magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in the units

of the applicable emission control regulation and the operating data and

calculations used in estimating the magnitude;

(h.) The measures taken to mitigate the extent and duration of the excess

emissions; and

(i.) The measures taken to remedy the situation which caused the excess emissions

and the measures taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of these

situations.

10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required

The permittee shall not commence construction, modification, or major modification

of any installation subject to this rule, begin operation after that construction,

modification, or major modification, or begin operation of any installation which has

been shut down longer than five (5) years without first obtaining a permit from the

permitting authority.

10 CSR 10-6.065, Operating Permits

The permittee shall file for renewal of this operating permit no sooner than eighteen

months, nor later than six (6) months, prior to the expiration date of this operating

permit. The permittee shall retain the most current operating permit issued to this

installation on-site and shall immediately make such permit available to any

Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

10 CSR 10-6.110, Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process

Information

The permittee shall complete and submit an Emission Inventory Questionnaire (EIQ)

in accordance with the requirements outlined in this rule.

10 CSR 10-6.130, Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air Pollution

Potential

This rule specifies the conditions that establish an air pollution alert (yellow/red),

watch or emergency and the associated procedures and emissions reduction

objectives for dealing with each. The permittee shall submit an appropriate

emergency plan if required by the Director.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 198

Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.150, Circumvention

The permittee shall not cause or permit the installation or use of any device or any

other means which, without resulting in reduction in the total amount of air

contaminant emitted, conceals or dilutes an emission or air contaminant which

violates a rule of the Missouri Air Conservation Commission.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants

(a.) The director may require any person responsible for the source of emission of

air contaminants to make or have made tests to determine the quantity or

nature, or both, of emission of air contaminants from the source. The director

may specify testing methods to be used in accordance with good professional

practice. The director may observe the testing. All tests shall be performed by

qualified personnel.

(b.) The director may conduct tests of emissions of air contaminants from any

source. Upon request of the director, the person responsible for the source to

be tested shall provide necessary ports in stacks or ducts and other safe and

proper sampling and testing facilities, exclusive of instruments and sensing

devices as may be necessary for proper determination of the emission of air

contaminants.

(c.) The director shall be given a copy of the test results in writing and signed by the

person responsible for the tests.

10 CSR 10- 3.030, Open Burning Restrictions

(a.) The permittee shall not conduct, cause, permit or allow a salvage operation, the

disposal of trade wastes or burning of refuse by open burning.

(b.) Exception - Open burning of trade waste or vegetation may be permitted only

when it can be shown that open burning is the only feasible method of disposal

or an emergency exists which requires open burning.

(c.) Any person intending to engage in open burning shall file a request to do so

with the director. The request shall include the following:

(1.) The name, address and telephone number of the person submitting the

application; The type of business or activity involved; A description of the

proposed equipment and operating practices, the type, quantity and

composition of trade wastes and expected composition and amount of air

contaminants to be released to the atmosphere where known;

(2.) The schedule of burning operations;

(3.) The exact location where open burning will be used to dispose of the trade

wastes;

(4.) Reasons why no method other than open burning is feasible; and

(5.) Evidence that the proposed open burning has been approved by the fire

control authority which has jurisdiction.

(d.) Upon approval of the open burning permit application by the director, the

person may proceed with the operation under the terms of the open burning

permit. Be aware that such approval shall not exempt Lone Star Industries,

Inc. from the provisions of any other law, ordinance or regulation.

(e.) The permittee shall maintain files with letters from the director approving the

open burning operation and previous DNR inspection reports.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 199

Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-3.090, Restriction of Emission of Odors

No person may cause, permit or allow the emission of odorous matter in

concentrations and frequencies or for durations that odor can be perceived when one

(1) volume of odorous air is diluted with seven (7) volumes of odor-free air for two (2)

separate trials not less than fifteen (15) minutes apart within the period of one (1)

hour.

This requirement is not federally enforceable.

10 CSR 10-6.100, Alternate Emission Limits

Proposals for alternate emission limitations shall be submitted on Alternate

Emission Limits Permit forms provided by the department. An installation owner or

operator must obtain an Alternate Emission Limits Permit in accordance with 10

CSR 10-6.100 before alternate emission limits may become effective.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 200

Project No. 031-0021-023

V. General Permit Requirements

Permit Duration

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.B.

This permit is issued for a term of five (5) years, commencing on the date of issuance. This permit

will expire at the end of this period unless renewed.

General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.C

I) Record Keeping

A) All required monitoring data and support information shall be retained for a period of at least

five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report or application.

B) Copies of all current operating and construction permits issued to this installation shall be

kept on-site for as long as the permits are in effect. Copies of these permits shall be made

immediately available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon

request.

II) Reporting

A) The permittee shall submit a report of all required monitoring by:

1) October 1st for monitoring which covers the January through June time period, and

2) April 1st for monitoring which covers the July through December time period.

3) Exception: Monitoring requirements which require reporting more frequently than semi

annually shall report no later than thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar quarter in

which the measurements were taken.

B) Each report must identify any deviations from emission limitations, monitoring, record

keeping, reporting, or any other requirements of the permit.

C) All reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Operating Permit Unit,

P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

D) Submit supplemental reports as required or as needed. Supplemental reports are required

no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation or other

restriction. All reports of deviations shall identify the cause or probable cause of the

deviations and any corrective actions or preventative measures taken.

1) Notice of any deviation resulting from an emergency (or upset) condition as defined in

paragraph (6)(C)7 of 10 CSR 10-6.065 (Emergency Provisions) shall be submitted to the

permitting authority either verbally or in writing within two (2) working days after the date

on which the emission limitation is exceeded due to the emergency, if you wish to assert

an affirmative defense. The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated

through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that

indicate an emergency occurred and that you can identify the cause(s) of the emergency.

The permitted installation must show that it was operated properly at the time and that

during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize

levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or requirements in the permit.

The notice must contain a description of the emergency, the steps taken to mitigate

emissions, and the corrective actions taken.

2) Any deviation that poses an imminent and substantial danger to public health, safety or

the environment shall be reported as soon as practicable.

3) Any other deviations identified in the permit as requiring more frequent reporting than

the permittee's semiannual report shall be reported on the schedule specified in the

permit.

E) Every report submitted shall be certified by the responsible official, except that, if a report of

a deviation must be submitted within ten (10) days after the deviation, the report may be

submitted without a certification if the report is resubmitted with an appropriate certification
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 201

Project No. 031-0021-023

within ten (10) days after that, together with any corrected or supplemental information

required concerning the deviation.

F) The permittee may request confidential treatment of information submitted in any report of

deviation.

G) These supplemental reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program,

Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 no later than ten (10) days

after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation, or other restriction.

Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r)

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.D.

The permittee shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 68, Accidental Release Prevention

Requirements. If the permittee has more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in

process, as determined by 40 CFR Section 68.115, the permittee shall submit a Risk Management

Plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68 no later than the latest of the following dates:

1) June 21, 1999;

2) Three (3) years after the date on which a regulated substance is first listed under 40 CFR

Section 68.130; or

3) The date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in a

process.

Severability Clause

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.F.

In the event of a successful challenge to any part of this permit, all uncontested permit conditions

shall continue to be in force.

General Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.G

1) The permittee must comply with all of the terms and conditions of this permit. Any

noncompliance with a permit condition constitutes a violation and is grounds for enforcement

action, permit termination, permit revocation and re-issuance, permit modification or denial of a

permit renewal application.

2) The permittee may not use as a defense in an enforcement action that it would have been

necessary for the permittee to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain

compliance with the conditions of the permit.

3) The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, reissued or terminated for cause. Except as

provided for minor permit modifications, the filing of an application or request for a permit

modification, revocation and re-issuance, or termination, or the filing of a notification of planned

changes or anticipated noncompliance, will not stay any permit condition.

4) This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, nor grant any exclusive privilege.

5) The permittee shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program, upon receipt of a written

request and within a reasonable time, any information that the Air Pollution Control Program

reasonably may require to determine whether cause exists for modifying, reopening, reissuing or

revoking the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee

also shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program copies of records required to be kept by

the permittee. The permittee may make a claim of confidentiality for any information or records

submitted pursuant to 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 202

Project No. 031-0021-023

Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.H.

No permit revision will be required for any installation changes made under any approved economic

incentive, marketable permit, emissions trading, or other similar programs or processes provided for

in this permit.

Reasonably Anticipated Operating Scenarios

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.I.

The installation has a couple of operating scenarios in regards to the cement kiln.

4) The installation has an in-line raw mill which allows the installation to operate the raw mill

with either the kiln on or off. The permit conditions for the cement kiln and raw mill have

taken these operating scenarios into consideration. The following permit conditions give the

specific requirements necessary when the raw mill is operating with or without the kiln:

EU0500-004, EU0500-005, EU0500-006, EU0500-007, EU0500-008, EU0500-009, EU0500-

010, EU0500-014, EU0500-017, EU0520-001, EU0520-002, EU0520-003 and EU0520-004.

5) The installation has the alternative of complying with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or 40 CFR

Part 63, Subpart EEE, when the cement kiln is not burning hazardous waste. The following

permit conditions have alternate standard provisions with specific monitoring and record

keeping requirements which allow the installation the alternative of selecting the method of

compliance: EU0500-005, EU0500-006, EU0500-007, EU0500-008, EU0500-009, EU0500-

010, EU0500-011, EU0500-012, EU0500-013, EU0500-014, EU0500-015, EU0500-016,

EU0500-017.

Compliance Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)3.

I) Any document (including reports) required to be submitted under this permit shall contain a

certification signed by the responsible official.

II) Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee

shall allow authorized officials of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, or their

authorized agents, to perform the following (subject to the installation’s right to seek confidential

treatment of information submitted to, or obtained by, the Air Pollution Control Program):

A) Enter upon the premises where a permitted installation is located or an emissions-related

activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

B) Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the

conditions of this permit;

C) Inspect, at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices, any facilities, equipment

(including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated

or required under this permit; and

D) As authorized by the Missouri Air Conservation Law, Chapter 643, RSMo or the Act, sample

or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring

compliance with the terms of this permit, and all applicable requirements as outlined in this

permit.

III) All progress reports required under an applicable schedule of compliance shall be submitted

semiannually (or more frequently if specified in the applicable requirement). These progress

reports shall contain the following:

A) Dates for achieving the activities, milestones or compliance required in the schedule of

compliance, and dates when these activities, milestones or compliance were achieved, and

B) An explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met,

and any preventative or corrective measures adopted.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 203

Project No. 031-0021-023

IV) The permittee shall submit an annual certification that it is in compliance with all of the

federally enforceable terms and conditions contained in this permit, including emissions

limitations, standards, or work practices. These certifications shall be submitted annually

unless the applicable requirement specifies more frequent submission. The compliance

certification shall include the following:

A) The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification,

B) The current compliance status, as shown by monitoring data and other information

reasonably available to the installation,

C) Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent,

D) The method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the installation, both currently

and over the reporting period, and

E) Such other facts as the Air Pollution Control Program will require in order to determine the

compliance status of this installation.

Permit Shield

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)6.

I) Compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with all applicable

requirements as of the date that this permit is issued, provided that:

A) The applicable requirements are included and specifically identified in this permit; or

B) The permitting authority, in acting on the permit revision or permit application, determines

in writing that other requirements, as specifically identified in the permit, are not applicable

to the installation, and this permit expressly includes that determination or a concise

summary of it.

II) Be aware that there are exceptions to this permit protection. The permit shield does not affect

the following:

A) The provisions of section 303 of the Act or section 643.090, RSMo concerning emergency

orders,

B) Liability for any violation of an applicable requirement which occurred prior to, or was

existing at, the time of permit issuance,

C) The applicable requirements of the acid rain program,

D) The administrator's authority to obtain information, or

E) Any other permit or extra-permit provisions, terms or conditions expressly excluded from the

permit shield provisions.

At the time of permit issuance, the following rules do not apply to Lone Star Industries

Citation Regulation Description

10 CSR 10-3.060 Maximum Allowable Emissions of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning Equipment Used for

Indirect Heating

10 CSR 10-3.110 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Dioxide for Use of Fuel

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart D

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators for Which Construction Is

Commenced After August 17, 1971

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Db

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Dc

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart E

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Incinerators
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 204

Project No. 031-0021-023

Citation Regulation Description

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Ea

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is

Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Eb

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is

Commenced After December 20, 1994 or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is

Commenced After June 19, 1996

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Ec

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which

Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart K

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction,

Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to May 19, 1978

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart Ka

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction,

Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After May 18, 1978, and Prior to July 23, 1984

10 CSR 10-6.070

40 CFR Part 60,

Subpart WWW

New Source Performance Regulations

Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

10 CSR 10-6.075

40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart T

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning

10 CSR 10-6.075

40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart DD

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery

Operations

10 CSR 10-6.080

40 CFR Part 61,

Subpart V

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

National Emission Standard for Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources)

10 CSR 10-6.160 Medical Waste and Solid Waste Incinerators

10 CSR 10-6.190 Sewage Sludge and Industrial Waste Incinerators

10 CSR 10-6.200 Hospital, Medical, Infectious Waste Incinerators

10 CSR 10-6.310 Restriction of Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Emergency Provisions

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7.

I) An emergency or upset as defined in 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7. shall constitute an affirmative

defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with technology-based emissions

limitations. To establish an emergency- or upset-based defense, you must demonstrate, through

properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence, the following:

A) That an emergency or upset occurred and that you can identify the source of the emergency

or upset,

B) That the installation was being operated properly,

C) That you took all reasonable steps to minimize emissions that exceeded technology-based

emissions limitations or requirements in this permit, and

D) That you submitted notice of the emergency to the Air Pollution Control Program within two

(2) working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to the emergency.

This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate

emissions, and any corrective actions taken.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 205

Project No. 031-0021-023

II) Be aware that an emergency or upset shall not include noncompliance caused by improperly

designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or

operator error.

Operational Flexibility

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)8.

An installation that has been issued a Part 70 operating permit is not required to apply for or obtain

a permit revision in order to make any of the changes to the permitted installation described below

if the changes are not Title I modifications, the changes do not cause emissions to exceed emissions

allowable under the permit, and the changes do not result in the emission of any air contaminant

not previously emitted. The permittee shall notify the Air Pollution Control Program and the

Administrator at least seven (7) days in advance of these changes, except as allowed for emergency

or upset conditions. Emissions allowable under the permit means a federally enforceable permit

term or condition determined at issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that

established an emissions limit (including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable

emissions cap that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source

would otherwise be subject.

I) Section 502(b)(10) changes. Changes that, under section 502(b)(10) of the Act, contravene an

express permit term may be made without a permit revision, except for changes that would

violate applicable requirements of the Act or contravene federally enforceable monitoring

(including test methods), record keeping, reporting or compliance requirements of the permit.

A) Before making a change under this provision, The permittee shall provide advance written

notice to the Air Pollution Control Program and to the Administrator, describing the changes

to be made, the date on which the change will occur, and any changes in emission and any

permit terms and conditions that are affected. The permittee shall maintain a copy of the

notice with the permit, and this agency shall place a copy with the permit in the public file.

Written notice shall be provided to the administrator and this agency at least seven (7) days

before the change is to be made. If less than seven (7) days notice is provided because of a

need to respond more quickly to these unanticipated conditions, The permittee shall provide

notice to the administrator and the permitting authority as soon as possible after learning of

the need to make the change.

B) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Off-Permit Changes

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)9.

I) Except as noted below, The permittee may make any change in its permitted operations,

activities or emissions that is not addressed in, constrained by or prohibited by this permit

without obtaining a permit revision. Insignificant activities listed in the application, but not

otherwise addressed in or prohibited by this permit, shall not be considered to be constrained by

this permit for purposes of the off-permit provisions of this section. Off-permit changes shall be

subject to the following requirements and restrictions:

A) The change must meet all applicable requirements of the Act and may not violate any

existing permit term or condition; The permittee may not change a permitted installation

without a permit revision, if this change is subject to any requirements under Title IV of the

Act or is a Title I modification;

B) The permittee must provide written notice of the change to the permitting authority and to

the administrator no later than the next annual emissions report. This notice shall not be

required for changes that are insignificant activities under paragraph (6)(B)3. of this rule.

This written notice shall describe each change, including the date, any change in emissions,

pollutants emitted and any applicable requirement that would apply as a result of the

change.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 206

Project No. 031-0021-023

C) The permittee shall keep a record describing all changes made at the installation that result

in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an applicable requirement and the

emissions resulting from these changes; and

D) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Responsible Official

10 CSR 10-6.020(2)(R)12.

The application utilized in the preparation of this was signed by John E. Burian, Director of

Operations. On April 16, 2001 the Air Pollution Control Program was notified that William Steven

Leus, Jr., Plant Manager has replaced John E. Burian as the responsible official. If this person

terminates employment, or is reassigned different duties such that a different person becomes the

responsible person to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting affairs, the

owner or operator of this air contaminant source shall notify the Director of the Air Pollution

Control Program of the change. Said notification shall be in writing and shall be submitted within

thirty (30) days of the change. The notification shall include the name and title of the new person

assigned by the source owner or operator to represent and bind the installation in environmental

permitting affairs. All representations, agreement to terms and conditions and covenants made by

the former responsible person that were used in the establishment of limiting permit conditions on

this permit will continue to be binding on the installation until such time that a revision to this

permit is obtained that would change said representations, agreements and covenants.

Statement of Basis

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(E)1.C.

This permit is accompanied by a statement setting forth the legal and factual basis for the draft

permit conditions (including references to applicable statutory or regulatory provisions). This

Statement of Basis, while referenced by the permit, is not an actual part of the permit.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 207

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment A

Fugitive Emission Observations

 Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions

 Beyond

Dat Boundary

e

Tim

e

No Yes

 Less

than

Norm

al

Norm

al

Great

er

Than

Norm

al

 Cause Corrective

Action

Initi

al
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 208

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment B

(Outdoor) Observation Log

Responsible Facility

Operator:

Date:

Sky Conditions:

Precipitation:

Wind Direction:

Wind Speed:

Process Unit:

Sketch process unit: indicate observer position relative to source and sun; indicate potential

emission points and/or actual emission points.

OBSERVATIONS

Clock

Time

Observation

Period Duration,

min:sec

Accumulated

Emission Time,

min:sec

Begin Observation
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 209

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment C

Baghouse Operating and Maintenance Log

Date: ____________________

Incident of Malfunction: __________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Impact on Emissions: _____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Duration of Event: ________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Probable Cause: ___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Corrective Actions: _______________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 210

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment D

Maintenance Activities Schedule and Log

Date Maintenance

Activities

Repair Actions Replacements Notes
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 211

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment E

Raw Mill System Log

Date Daily Production Rate

(Tons)

Kiln Feed Rate

(Tons)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 212

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment F

Sulfur Content of the Waste Derived Liquid Fuel or Waste Oil

Date Amount of

Fuel (Gallons)

Sulfur Content

(%)

Monthly Average

Sulfur Content

(%)

Rolling 12-Month

Average Sulfur

Content (%)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 213

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment G

Waste Derived Liquid Fuel, Waste Oil and Tires Monthly Burn Logs

Date Amount of

Fuel Burned

(Gallons or Tons)

Monthly Total

of Fuel Burned

(Gallons or Tons)

Rolling 12-Month

Total of Fuel Burned

(Gallons or Tons)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 214

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment H

Compliance Methodology Log

Date Emission Unit Is Hazardous Waste Being

Fed to the Kiln (Yes/No)?

40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart EEE

40 CFR Part 63,

Subpart LLL
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 215

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment I

Daily Records for Pressure Drop (PSI) Across Five Baghouses

Date Baghouse #1 Baghouse #2 Baghouse #3 Baghouse #4 Baghouse #5
Lone Star Industries, Inc. 216

Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment J

Filter Cleaning Log

Date Number of Filters

Cleaned

Monthly Total of Filters

Cleaned

Rolling 12-Month Total

of Filters Cleaned
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 1

Project No. 031-0021-023

STATEMENT OF BASIS

Permit Reference Documents

These documents were relied upon in the preparation of the operating permit. Because they are not

incorporated by reference, they are not an official part of the operating permit.

1) Part 70 Operating Permit Application, received July 15, 1996;

2) 1999 Emissions Inventory Questionnaire, received April 1, 1998;

3) U.S. EPA document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors; Volume I,

Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition;

Section 13.2.4 Aggregate Handling and Storage Piles

Section 11.6 Portland Cement Manufacturing

Section 11.12 Concrete Batching

4) Construction Permit Number: 1277-007;

5) EPA PSD Permit 02/01/1978;

6) Construction Permit Number: 0483-009A to 0483-011A;

7) Construction Permit Number: 0691-010;

8) Construction Permit Number: 0392-001;

9) Construction Permit Number: 0693-009;

10)Construction Permit Number: 0697-004;

11)Construction Permit Number: 1197-012;

12)September 24, 1990, Settlement Agreement between Missouri Department of Natural Resources,

Attorney General and Lone Star Industries, Inc.

13)September 7, 1995, Opacity Limitation for “In-line” Portland Cement Plants Memorandum from

John Rasnic;

Applicable Requirements Included in the Operating Permit but Not in the Application

In the operating permit application, the installation indicated they were not subject to the following

regulation(s). However, in the review of the application, the agency has determined that the

installation is subject to the following regulation(s) for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-6.100, Alternate Emission Limits

This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the allowance of

requests for alternate emission limits. This citing provides the information necessary to know

that an alternate emission limit must be placed in a permit before the alternate emission limit

may become effective

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants,

This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the

allowance of requests for emissions data results. On past forms issued by the Air Pollution

Control Program, including the application for this permit, it was automatically marked as an

administrative rule not required to be listed as an applicable requirement. It is no longer

judged to be solely administrative and is, therefore, included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.220, Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been determined to

be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been determined to

be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in the operating permit.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 2

Project No. 031-0021-023

Other Air Regulations Determined Not to Apply to the Operating Permit

The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has determined the following requirements to not be

applicable to this installation at this time for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-3.060, Maximum Allowable Emissions of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning Equipment

Used for Indirect Heating

The fuel burning equipment at Lone Star are direct heating units. Therefore, 10 CSR10-

3.060 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-3.110, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Dioxide for Use of Fuel

This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan

and replaced by 10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds. Therefore,

10 CSR 10-3.110 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.160, Medical Waste and Solid Waste Incinerators

This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan.

Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.160 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.190, Sewage Sludge and Industrial Waste Incinerators

This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan.

Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.190 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.200, Hospital, Medical, Infectious Waste Incinerators

Cement kilns firing hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste are not subject to this

rule. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.200 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.310, Restriction of Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

This regulation applies to municipal solid waste landfills where household waste is placed.

Presently the landfill only accepts cement kiln dust (CKD). The landfill has not accepted

household waste. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.310 is not included in the operating permit.

Construction Permit Revisions

The following revisions were made to construction permits for this installation:

1) EPA PSD Permit 02/01/1978

The special conditions have already been complied with by the installation or are part of the NSPS,

therefore this construction permit was not included in the operating permit.

2) Construction Permit Number: 0691-010

Special Conditions #1, #2 and #3 deal with performance testing criteria for the combusting of tires

and “alternate fuels”. The performance test results were utilized to establish limits for the

amounts of tires and alternate fuels to be burned at Lone Star. The performance testing

requirements have been completed for construction permit number: 0691-010 and a feedrate limit

has been established for tires from the performance test results. Therefore the performance testing

conditions were not included in the operating permit.

Special Condition #4 is written as follows:

“No more than four (4) tires per minute shall be processed through the portland cement kiln until

stack test results can be evaluated and a new limit set by the Air Pollution Control Program. The
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 3

Project No. 031-0021-023

new limit must be obtained in writing from the Air Pollution Control Program and shall be attached

to the permit upon receipt by Lone Star.”

The installation conducted a stack test in June of 1992 from which a new limit on the feedrate of

the tires was established. The new tire feedrate established via the stack test is 4200 lb/hr or 2.1

tons/hr.

Special Condition #5 is written as follows:

“Records shall be kept on-site for a period of at least two (2) years of the number of tires burned

and the amounts of alternate fuels burned in the portland cement kiln, ...”

With the operating permit program, the record retention period has been extended to five (5) years,

therefore changes were made in the record retention period for this construction permit

3) Construction Permit Number: 0392-001

Special Condition #8 deals with performance testing criteria. Since the installation has already

completed the performance testing requirements for construction permit number: 0392-001, the

conditions were not included in the operating permit.

4) Construction Permit Number: 0693-009

Special Condition #2 is written as follows:

“...Records for the most recent 24-month period must be kept at the facility.”

With the operating permit program, the record retention period has been extended to five (5) years,

therefore changes were made in the record retention period for this construction permit.

Special Condition #3 has a ten (10) day reporting requirement. According to our enforcement

section, the reporting requirement should be fifteen (15) days. Therefore, the reporting condition

has been modified.

5) Construction Permit Number: 0697-004

The only special condition listed in this construction permit is the required performance testing

under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO. Since the installation has already completed this testing,

this construction permit was not included in the operating permit.

6) Construction Permit Number: 1197-012

The requirements from this construction permit were replaced by construction permit number:

1197-012A. Therefore, the requirements of construction permit number: 1197-012 were not

included in the operating permit.

NSPS Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D, Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Stem Generators for

Which Construction is Commenced After August 17, 1971

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db, Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam

Generating Units

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc, Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional

Steam Generating Units

The Back Up Generators at Lone Star are 470kW (1.6 MMBTU/Hr) and 500kW (1.7

MMBTU/Hr) which are below the applicability levels for 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D, Db and

Dc. Therefore, these requirements were not included in the operating permit.

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart E – Standards of Performance for Incinerators

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ea – Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which

Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 4

Project No. 031-0021-023

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Eb – Standards of Performance for Large Municipal Waste Combustors for

Which Construction is Commenced After September 20, 1994 or for Which Modification or

Reconstruction is Commenced After June 19, 1996

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ec – Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste

Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996

These regulations apply to any incinerator used in the process of burning solid, municipal,

hospital, medical or infectious waste. Solid waste is defined as: “refuse, more than fifty

percent (50%) of which is municipal type waste consisting of a mixture of paper, wood yard

wastes, food wastes, plastics, leather, rubber and other combustibles and noncombustible

materials such as glass and rock.”

The material combusted at Lone Star Indusctries, Inc. does not meet the definition of solid,

municipal, hospital, medical or infectious waste, therefore this regulation was not included in

the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in portland cement plants that

commences construction or modification after August 17, 1971: Kiln, clinker cooler, raw mill

system, finish mill system, raw mill dryer, raw material storage, clinker storage, finished

product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging and bulk loading and unloading systems.

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, §63.1356 an exemption from new source

performance standards is given. Any affected source subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part

63, Subpart LLL, is exempted from any otherwise applicable new source performance

standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, except for:

Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b), located at areas

sources are subject to PM and opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping,

under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

Greenfield raw material dryers, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b) located at area sources

are subject to opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping under 40 CFR Part

60, Subpart F.

Since the installation is a major source according to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, the

installation is exempted from the new source performance standard contained in 40 CFR

Part 60, Subpart F when the installation begins complying with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart

LLL.

EU0760 and EU0770 – Clinker Storage Pile Farms – The installation has two (2) main areas

where clinker storage piles are maintained. Clinker is only stored outside when no available

space exists inside for storage. The same is true for enclosed storage piles. The installation

was unable to quantify the number of storage piles because the number of piles in each

category is determined by need and can vary from year to year depending on market

conditions. It was therefore determined that the clinker storage piles would be identified by

farms under single emission unit numbers and the installation would be required to

demonstrate compliance for the varying number of piles from year to year.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Standards

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K, Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for

Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to

May 19, 1978

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for

Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification commenced After May 18, 1978, and Prior to July

23, 1984
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 5

Project No. 031-0021-023

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels

(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification

Commenced after July 23, 1984

The following storage tanks were installed prior to June 11, 1973 or are below the level of

reporting significance (Subpart K – 40,000 Gallons, Subpart Ka – 40,000 Gallons and

Subpart Kb – 10,566.91 Gallons) and therefore are not subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart K,

Ka or Kb:

Description Capacity (Gallons) 

Storage Tanks #2, 5 and 6 – Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage 300

Storage Tanks #3 and 4 – Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage 150

Storage Tank #7 – Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage 8,000

Storage Tank #8 – Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage 10,000

Storage Tank #9 – Gasoline Tank – Quarry Garage 560

Storage Tank #10 – Used Oil Tank – Quarry Garage 1000

Storage Tank #11 – Diesel Tank – Additive Crusher 300

Storage Tank #12 – Diesel Tank – River Unloading Dock 250

Storage Tank #13 – Diesel Tank – Spray Pond Pumps 150

Storage Tank #15 – Diesel Tank – Courtyard 560

Storage Tank #16 – Diesel Tank – Plant Emergency Generator 200

Storage Tank #17 – Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300

Storage Tank #17A – Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300

Storage Tank #18 – Diesel Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300

Storage Tank #19 – Gasoline Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300

Storage Tank #20 – Diesel Tank – Contractor Parking Lot 550

Storage Tank #21 – Gasoline Tank – Contractor Parking Lot 300

Storage Tank #27 – Diesel Tank – Waste Fuel Area 300

Storage Tank #28 – Diesel Tank – Elec. Room – 17 500

MS10-Diesel Tank (50,000 Gallons) (Storage Tank #14) was installed in 1980 and is not

subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, due to Diesel not meeting the

definition of petroleum liquids. According to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, petroleum liquids

is defined as:

“Petroleum liquids means petroleum, condensate and any finished or intermediate

products manufactured in a petroleum refinery but does not mean Nos. 2 through 6

fuel oils as specified in ASTM D396-78, gas turbine fuel oils Nos. 2-GT through 4-GT

as specified in ASTM D2880-78, gas turbine fuel oils Nos. 2-GT through 4-GT as

specified in ASTM D2880-78, or diesel fuel oils Nos. 2-D and 4-D as specified in ASTM

D975-78.”

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Standards

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels

(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification

Commenced after July 23, 1984

§60.113b(c)(2) states as follows: Operate the closed vent system and control device and

monitor the parameters of the closed vent system and control device in accordance with the

operating plan submitted to the Administrator in accordanc3e with §60.113b(c)(1), unless the

plan was modified by the Administrator during the review process. In this case, the modified

plan applies.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 6

Project No. 031-0021-023

According to the operating permit application on EU1530 through EU1580, the parameter

being monitored is the HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the carbon absorbers at the

vent to the kiln. The sampling frequency is listed as continuous in the operating permit

application however, the monitor does not contain a continuous print-out of the monitored

values. The monitor’s valve is read and recorded daily – not continuously. Therefore, the

actual parameters being monitored were including in the operating permit with a daily record

keeping requirement rather than the standard wording from the New Source Performance

Standard.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y, Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants

This standard is applicable to any of the following affected facilities in coal preparation plants

which process more than 200 tons per day and commenced construction or modification

after October 24, 1974: Thermal dryers, pneumatic coal-cleaning equipment (air tables), coal

processing and conveying equipment (including breakers and crushers), coal storage systems

and coal transfer and loading systems. The coal processing and conveying equipment are

subject to the requirements of this standard.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants

This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in fixed or portable notmetallic

mineral processing plants that commences construction or modification after August 31,

1983: each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor,

bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station.

According to §60.670(b), “An affected facility that is subject to the provisions of subpart F or I

or that follows in the plant process any facility subject to the provisions of subparts F or I of

this part is not subject to the provisions of this subpart.”

The following quarry operations were installed prior to August 31, 1983 are not subject to

this standard:

Quarry Operation Installation Date

Hopper (A-1601) 1978

Primary Crusher (A-1700) 1978

Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-1900) 1978

Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-2000) 1978

Chute (A-2002) 1978

Transfer Belt From Crusher To Piles (A-2500) 1978

Transfer Belt From Crusher To Piles (A-2600) 1978

Transfer Belt to Piles #1 (A-3300) 1978

Transfer Belt to Piles #4 (A-3400) 1978

The other quarry operations installed after August 31, 1983 which are prior to any facility

processes that are subject to the provisions of subparts F, are subject to the requirements of

this standard.

Since the rest of installation is either subject to the provisions of subpart F or follows in the

plant process a facility subject to the provision of subpart F, this requirement was not

included in the operating permit for those processes.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WWW – Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

This regulation applies to municipal solid waste landfills where household waste is placed.

Presently the landfill only accepts cement kiln dust (CKD). The landfill has monitoring wells

and the wells are monitored yearly as a condition of the RCRA permit. The landfill has not

accepted household waste, therefore this regulation was not included in the operating permit.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 7

Project No. 031-0021-023

MACT Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T, National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning

The provisions of this subpart apply to each individual batch vapor, in-line vapor, in-line

cold, and batch cold solvent cleaning machine that uses any solvent containing methylene

chloride, perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride or

chloroform, or any combination of these halogenated HAP solvents, in a total concentration

greater than five percent (5%) by weight, as a cleaning and/or drying agent. Wipe cleaning

activities, such as using a rag containing halogenated solvent are not covered under the

provisions of this subpart.

Lone Star Industries uses mineral spirits or a citrus based solvent in four (4) parts washers

(thirty-five (35) gallons). Therefore, the installation does not use a regulated solvent and the

requirements were not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site

Waste and Recovery Operations

The installation is not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, due to the exemption stated in

§63.683(c)(1). According to §63.683(c)(1):

“An off-site material management unit is exempted from the requirements specified in

§63.683(b), if the unit is also subject to another subpart under 40 CFR Part 61 or 40

CFR Part 63, and the owner or operator is controlling the HAP listed in Table 1 of this

subpart that are emitted from the unit in compliance with the provisions specified in

the other applicable subpart.”

According to §63.680(b)(2)(vi), the following materials are not off-site materials:

“Waste that is generated by or transferred from units complying with all applicable

requirements specfieid by 61.342(b) under 40 CFR 61 subpart FF – National Emission

Standards for Benzene Waste Operations for a facility at which the total annual

benzene quantitiy from the facility waste is equal to or greater than 10 megagrams per

year.”

The off-site waste is placed in hazardous waste storage tanks complying with 40 CFR Part

61, Subpart FF, therefore when the waste leaves these storage tanks or is "transferred from”

these units complying with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, the waste is no longer off-site waste.

According to the July 1, 1996 Preamble:

“Some NESHAP already regulate air emissions from the off-site management of

certain wastes containing HAP. To avoid duplication of requirements in these cases,

the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP does not apply to waste

management units that either receive waste from units complying with all applicable

regulations under the HON, or receive waste from units complying with all applicable

requirements specified by §61.342(b) under 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF – National

Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations for a plant a which the total

annual benzene quantity is greater than or equal to ten (10) Mg/yr.”

The cement kiln and the hazardous waste storage tanks are complying with 40 CFR Part 61,

Subpart FF, therefore the requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD were not included in

the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from

Hazardous Waste Combustors
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 8

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of this subpart apply to all hazardous waste combustors: hazardous waste

incinerators, hazardous waste burning cement kilns and hazardous waste burning

lightweight kilns, except as provided in the table below:

IF AND IF THEN

You are a

previously affected

source

1) You ceased feeding hazardous waste for

a period of time greater than the

hazardous waste residence time (i.e.,

hazardous waste no longer resides in the

combustion chamber),

2) You are initiated the closure

requirements of subpart G, parts 264 or

265 of this Chapter,

3) You begin complying with the

requirements of all other applicable

standards of this part (Part 63), and

4) You notify the Administrator in writing

that you are no longer an affected

source under this Subpart EEE.

You are no longer subject to

Subpart EEE.

You are a research,

development, and

demonstration

source

You operate for no longer than one (1) year

after first burning hazardous waste

(Note that the Administrator can extent this

one (1)-year restriction on a case-by-case

basis upon your written request

documenting when you first burned

hazardous waste and the justification for

needing additional time to perform

research, development, or demonstration

operations.)

You are not subject to Subpart

EEE. This exemption applies

even if there is a hazardous

waste combustor at the plant

site that is regulated under this

subpart. You still, however,

remain subject to §270.65 of

this Chapter.

The only hazardous

wastes you burn

are exempt from

regulation under

§266.100(b) of this

Chapter

You are not subject to the

requirements of Subpart EEE.

The hazardous waste burning cement kiln is subject to the requirements of this standard.

Therefore, the MACT was included in the operating permit.

The MACT for hazardous waste combustors was finalized on September 30, 1999 and the

EPA has promulgated two (2) revisions to the standard on November 19, 1999 and July10,

2000. This regulation is still under negotiations with industry and a technical guidance

document is to be published in the near future. The regulation is likely to change as a result

of negotiation and litigation and certain changes may be necessary to the operating permit.

If 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE is revised, the installation is subject to the revised standard.

For operating permits with an expiration date more than three (3) years away, the permit

should be reopened to incorporate the new requirements. The mechanism for this reopening, under the current Part 70 rules, would be a “re-opening for cause”. The installation

should request a “re-opening of the operating permit for cause, upon rule modifications in

the federal register. The changes to the permit will be made as expeditiously as possible, but
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 9

Project No. 031-0021-023

no later than eighteen (18) months. As long as the installation is meeting the requirements

of the revised rule, it is deemed to be in compliance. The Air Pollution Control Program

would not view the installation as being in violation of the operating permit if the installation

is complying with the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as published in the federal

register.

PW020 – Lone Star is wanting to utilize data in lieu from a previous trial burn to demonstrate

compliance with the limits. The trial burn was conducted prior to the date listed for the data

in lieu provisions. According to Lone Star, this issue is still being negotiated with EPA. This

condition has been place in the operating permit, but if EPA decides to re-open 40 CFR Part

63, Subpart EEE and re-write this portion of the regulation, the operating permit will be reopened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit

conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Several of the operating parameter conditions require the installation to

minimize combustion temperature, maximize production rate or flue gas flowrate and

maximize waste feedrate. According to Lone Star, one cannot minimize temperature and

maximize production and waste feed rate simultaneously. We understand the concerns of

the installation, however the permit condition must remain as written, but if EPA decides to

re-open 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and re-write this portion of the regulation, the

operating permit will be re-opened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable

and revise the permit conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – The installation operates under two (2) different modes of operation,

raw mill on and raw mill off. The operational parameters to control SVM, LVM, Hydrochloric

Acid, Chlorine Gas, opacity, CO, and THC emissions and DRE do not change as operational

modes change, therefore the different modes of operation condition under §63.1209(q) will

not be included in the SVM, LVM, Hydrochloric Acid, Chlorine Gas, opacity, CO, and THC

emissions and DRE conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Performance Testing – According to Lone Star for all emission levels

established under LLL or EEE, the worse emission and most stringent operations limit

occurs with the raw mill off. The industry is negotiating with the agency to establish

operating parameter limits under the worse conditions and by default in compliance under

the other condition(s). This condition will remain in the operating permit as written. If EPA

decides to revise 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, the operating permit can be reopened for

cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Alternate Monitoring Scenario for EEE – The installation would like the

ability to have an alternate monitoring scenario for EEE when not burning hazardous waste.

This was set up in the operating permit by giving the installation the ability to move back and

forth between 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and Subpart LLL monitoring, record keeping,

performance testing when the installation was not burning hazardous waste fuel. The

installation has submitted a request to EPA Region VII for an alternate monitoring scenario

under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE. If the alternate monitoring scenario is approved by

EPA Region VII, the requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL will be removed from the

cement kiln emission unit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the

Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 10

Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing portland cement plant that is a

major or an area source. The affected sources subject to this regulation are:

• Each kiln and each in-line kiln/raw mill at any major or area source, including alkali

bypasses, except for kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that burn hazardous waste and are

subject to and regulated under subpart EEE of this part;

• Each clinker cooler at any portand cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each finish mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major source and each

greenfield raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major or area source;

• Each conveying system transfer point at any portland cement plant that is a major

source;

• Each bagging system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; and

• Each bulk loading or unloading system at any portland cement plant that is a major

source;

The installation is a major source of HAPs, and therefore the kiln, raw mill, clinker cooler,

finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system and bulk

loading /unloading systems are covered by the MACT. The long-dry process kiln does

contain an alkali bypass and an in-line raw mill.

The MACT for the portland cement manufacturing industry was finalized on June 14, 1999.

This regulation is still under negotiations with industry. The regulation is likely to change as

a result of negotiation and litigation and certain changes may be necessary to the operating

permit.

If 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL is revised, the installation is subject to the revised standard.

For operating permits with an expiration date more than three (3) years away, the permit

should be reopened to incorporate the new requirements. The mechanism for this reopening, under the current Part 70 rules, would be a “re-opening for cause”. The installation

should request a “re-opening of the operating permit for cause, upon rule modifications in

the federal register. The changes to the permit will be made as expeditiously as possible, but

no later than eighteen (18) months. As long as the installation is meeting the requirements

of the revised rule, it is deemed to be in compliance. The Air Pollution Control Program

would not view the installation as being in violation of the operating permit if the installation

is complying with the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as published in the federal

register.

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL – The first source affected are the raw material

storage just prior to the raw mill. If the emission units are not the raw material storage prior

to the raw mill, the emission units are not covered by LLL:

“...the first affected source in the sequence of materials handling operations subject to

this NESHAP is the raw material storage, which is just prior to the raw mill. The primary

and secondary crushers and any other equipment in the non-metallic mineral processing

plant, which precede the raw material storage are not affected sources under this

NESHAP. The first conveyor system transfer point subject to this NESHAP is the transfer

point associated with the conveyor transferring material from the raw material storage to

the raw mill.”

Based on this definition, the first emission units affected by 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL are

the raw material storage silos (EU0150 through EU0220) and the conveyor transfer points

that transfer material to from the storage silos to the raw mill (EU230, EU0470 – EU0490) :

EU0150 – Raw Material Sotrage Silo W-4501 (Limestone)

EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 11

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli)

EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale)

EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum)

EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone)

EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash)

EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash)

EU0230 - Hopper/Weigh Belt R-3202

EU0470 - Transfer Belt R-3801

EU0480 - Transfer Belt R-3803

EU0490 - Transfer Belt R-3700

The kiln system has an in-line raw mill and the kiln gases may pass through the raw mill or

ducted around the raw mill. In either case, the emissions pass through the same air

pollution dust collector and are vented through the same stack. According to a September 7,

1995, memorandum on the Opacity Limitation for “In-line” Portland Cement Plants from

John Rasnic:

“In an April 6, 1995, memorandum regarding “Opacity Limitations for the Portland

Cement Plant New Source Performance Standards “ (NSPS), we stated that where gases

originate in one affected facility and pass through another affected facility as part of the

manufacturing process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) applies the emission

limitation or standard for the affected facility from which the gases are discharged directly

into the atmosphere. In the example discussed in the April 6, 1995, memorandum, kiln

gases are routed through a raw mill, and we state that the raw mill opacity limitation of

10% applies. Where the kiln and raw mill operate as separate affected facilities, this

determination continues to be correct.

However, many dry process portland cement plants are constructed in an “in-line” fashion

where the kiln, precalciner, preheater and raw mill are integrated so that the kiln gases

are used to perform the drying activity in the raw mill and the raw mill is simply an

extension of the kiln. In this “in-line” system, no independent raw mill activity exists and

the raw mill does not generate a separate gas stream. The kiln is capable of operating

without the raw mill but the raw mill can not operate without the kiln gases. In this

configuration, the raw mill does not exist as a separate NSPS affected facility.

Consequently, we believe it is appropriate for the gases exiting the “in-line” kiln/raw mill

combination to be subject to the twenty percent (20%) opacity limit and the 0.30 pounds

per ton of feed particulate matter limit which applies to kilns in... ...Any time the raw mill

operates independently without kiln gas, the ten percent (10%) opacity limit applies. If

the facility also exhaust gases through an alkali bypass stack, the emissions from the

bypass stack must also meet the twenty percent (20%) opacity limit and the combines

particulate matter emission from the bypass stack and the “in-line” kiln/raw mill main

stack must meet the 0.30 pounds per ton of feed particulate matter limit.”

The application of the limits from the MACT are applied in a similar manner as mentioned for

the NSPS in the referenced memorandum.

The clinker cooler at the plant is an enclosed system. According to the installation, the

equipment has been previously included with the kiln and raw mill on EIQs, but the clinker

cooler makes no contribution to the emissions from those sources. Most emissions are

vented through a heat exchanger and back into the clinker cooler. Some of the process air is

also used to heat the coal mills. The clinker cooler system does not vent directly to the

atmosphere, therefore it is not subject to the requirements of the Portland Cement

Manufacturing MACT.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 12

Project No. 031-0021-023

PW006 – Operations and Maintenance Plan – According to Lone Star, EPA and industry are

currently negotiating provisions of the ongoing SSM plan part of the Part 70 permit. This

condition has been placed in the operating permit, but if EPA decides to re-open 40 CFR Part

63, Subpart LLL and re-write this portion of the regulation, the operating permit will be reopened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit

conditions.

PW008 and EU0500 Conditions – Performance Testing – Lone Star is wanting to comply with

the MACT standards using the testing and emission averaging scenarios under 40 CFR Part

63, Subpart EEE. The installation would prefer not to be required to test under the

requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and LLL. These conditions have been placed

in the operating permit, but Lone Star can request alternate methodologies when submitting

their performance test plan to EPA Region VII. If EPA grants an alternate test plan

methodology and emission averaging scenario, the operating permit will be re-opened for

cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit conditions.

NESHAP Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos

The installation is subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart V, National Emission Standard for Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission

Sources)

The provisions of this subpart apply to each of the following sources that are intended to

operate in volatile hazardous air pollutant (VHAP) service: pumps, compressors, pressure

relief devices, sampling connection systems, open-ended valves or lines, valves, flanges and

other connectors, product accumulator vessels, and control devices or systems required by

this subpart.

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD references Subpart V, however as stated previously, the

installation is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD. The

installation is subject to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M and Subpart FF and neither subpart

references Subpart V. Therefore, the installation is not subject to the requirements of 40

CFR Part 61, Subpart V and it was not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations

The provisions of this subpart apply to owners and operators of chemical manufacturing

plants, coke by-product recovery plants and petroleum refineries. The provisions of this

subpart apply to owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal

facilities that treat store, or dispose of hazardous waste generated by any facility listed above

in the first sentence. The waste streams at hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal

facilities subject to the provisions of this subpart are the benzene-containing hazardous

waste from any facility listed above in the first sentence. A hazardous waste treatment,

storage, and disposal facility is a facility that must obtain a hazardous waste management

permit under subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.

The provisions of this subpart apply to wastewater streams, storage tanks, surface

impoundments, individual drain systems, oil-water separators, treatment processes, closedvent systems and control devices.

The requirements for 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF have been included in the operating permit

for the storage tanks and the treatment processes. The testing requirements listed in

Subpart FF for the treatment process were not included in the operating permit since Lone
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 13

Project No. 031-0021-023

Star has already demonstrated a DRE of at least 99.99% in their previous testing at the

installation and the testing requirements do not indicate a repeat frequency.

Other Regulatory Determinations

10 CSR 10-3.050, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes,

This rule is not applicable to the grinding, crushing and classifying operations at a rock

quarry. The installation has quarry operations and raw material handling operations. The

operations occurring prior to the raw material storage piles were considered quarry

operations and the operations occurring after the storage piles were considered raw material

handling operations. Therefore, the 10 CSR 10-3.050 was not applied to the following units:

Drilling

Blasting

Hopper A-1601

Primary Crusher A-1700

Transfer Belts A-1900/A-2000

10 CSR 10-3.050, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes,

EU0060 – Hopper (W-4600)

EU0080 – Transfer Belt (W-4900)

EU0090 – Transfer Belt (W-5000)

The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based

on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP42 Section 13.2.4, is eighteen and nine tenths (18.9) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0070 – Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary

The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based

on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.016 lbs/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-

4, is four and eight tenths (4.8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately thirteen (13) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0100 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0240 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

The particulate matter emission limit is 61 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based

on the MHDR (250/Tons Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP42 Section 13.2.4, is fifteen and seventy-five hundredths (15.75) lbs/hr. At the maximum

hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than

the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be

exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0110 – Hopper (W-5301)

EU0120 – Transfer Belt (W-5700)

EU0130 – Transfer Belt (W-3800)

EU0140 – Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000)

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process

based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 14

Project No. 031-0021-023

of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is seven and twenty-two (22) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0150 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone)

EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)

EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli)

EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale)

EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum)

EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone)

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust

Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is seven

and twenty-two (22) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is one and one tenth (1.1) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The

controlled emission rate is fifty-nine (59) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash)

EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash)

The particulate matter emission limit is 58.5 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust

Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (200 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twelve

and six tenths (12.6) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is six (6) tenths (0.6) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission

rate is four and five tenths (4.5) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate is ninety-seven (97) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly

unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record

keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0230 – Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202)

The particulate matter emission limit is 25.2 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust

Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (15 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is ninetyfive hundredths (0.95) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a

ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is five hundredths (0.05) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is twenty six (26) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate is over five hundred (500) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0250 – Hopper W-7100

EU0260 – Feeder Belt W-9800

EU0270 – Transfer Belt W-9700

EU0280 – Screen W-9701

The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this

process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from

equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is eight hundredths (0.08) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is over six hundred ninety (690) times less than the allowable emission rate. It
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 15

Project No. 031-0021-023

is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0290 – Transfer Belt W-7900

EU0300 – Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106

EU0310 – Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal)

EU0320 – Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)

The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this

process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from

equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is fifteen hundredths (0.15) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately four hundred (400) times less than the allowable emission

rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there

are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0330 – Transfer Belt C-1000

The particulate matter emission limit is 30.5 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this

process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from

equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is one hundredth (0.01) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0340 – Transfer Belt C-2400

The particulate matter emission limit is 19.2 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this

process based on the MHDR (10 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from

equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is five thousandths (0.005) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled

emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0350 – RSP Mill SystemC-2500

EU0360 – Kiln Mill System C-1100

The particulate matter emission limit is 30.5 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector and a cyclone. The cyclone is an integral part of the process and does not act as a

control device. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons

Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Section 13.2.4 equation (1), which

uses a multiplier of 0.35 to yield a PM10 emission factor of 0.00018, is one hundredth (0.01)

lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a control efficiency of ninetyfour percent (94%) is 6 ten-thousandths (0.0006) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the

allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be

exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0390 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

EU0400 – Truck Loading

The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process

based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1

of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is nine and five tenths (9.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately six (6) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 16

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0410 – Hopper Loading KB-7000

EU0420 – Transfer Belt KB-7200

EU0430 – Transfer Belt KB-7400

EU0440 – Elevator KB-7500

EU0450 – Transfer Belt KB-7600

EU0460 – Transfer Belt KB-7700

The particulate matter emission limit is 8.56 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process

based on the MHDR (3 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of

AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is two tenths (0.2) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the

uncontrolled emission rate is approximately forty-two (42) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 17

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0470 – Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801

EU0480 – Transfer Belt R-3803

EU0490 - Transfer Belt R-3700

The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process

based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1

of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly

design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the

allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be

exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0500 – Kiln (KB-5100)

EU0510 – Raw Mill System R-4300

The particulate matter emission limit is 61.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a cyclone

separator and a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the

MHDR (265 Tons Clinker/Hr) and the emission factor (7.149 lbs/Ton Clinker) from an

October 1995 stack test, is one thousand eight hundred ninety four (1894) lbs/hr. The

controlled emission rate for this process based on an overall control efficiency of ninety-eight

and two hundred twenty five thousandths percent (98.225%) is thirty three and six tenths

(33.6) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process is approximately 50% of the

allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to

demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU0540 – Raw Blend Silo B-0701

EU0550 – Raw Blend Silo B-0702

EU0560 – Raw Blend Silo B-0703

EU0570 – Raw Blend Silo B-0704

EU0590 – Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600

EU0600 – Air Slide (KB-1808)

EU0610 – Kiln Feed Bin (KB-1700)

The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty

and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on an

overall control efficiency of ninety-five percent (95%) is one and two hundredths (1.02)

lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately

three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is

approximately sixty-two (62) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely

that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or

monitoring requirements.

EU0580 – Transfer Belt KB-1200

The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty

and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on an

overall control efficiency of ninety-four percent (94%) is one and twenty-three hundredths

(1.23) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is

approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission

rate is approximately fifty-two (52) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly

unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record

keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 18

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0620 – Truck Loading KB-3821

The particulate matter emission limit is 40.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (30 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.30 lbs/Ton) from the Fire Factor for SCC

3-05-006-12, is nine (9) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a

ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is 5 tenths (0.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly

design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the

allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be

exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0630 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3800

EU0640 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3900

The particulate matter emission limit is 12.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (5 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.30 lbs/Ton) from the Fire Factor for SCC

3-05-006-12, is one and five tenths (1.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process

based on a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is one tenth (0.1) lbs/hr. At the

maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately eight (8) times

less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate

will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0650 – Drag Conveyor KC-501

EU0660 – Drag Conveyor KC-502

EU0670 – Elevator KC-0601

EU0680 – Elevator KC-0602

EU0690 – Truck Loading

The particulate matter emission limit is 57.1 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for the

process based on the MHDR (175 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lbs/Ton) from AP42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is seven (7) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately eight (8) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0700 – Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100

The particulate matter emission limit is 58.5 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for the

process based on the MHDR (200 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42

Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is eight (8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate,

the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately seven (7) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0730 – Hopper Loading W-9200

EU0740 – Transfer Belt W-7900

EU0750 – Transfer Belt W-8200

EU0760 - Transfer Belt KC-1000

EU0770 – Diverter Box KC-0603

EU0780 – Clinker Bin W-6601

EU0790 – Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4)

EU0800 – Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5)

EU0810 – Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr)
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 19

Project No. 031-0021-023

and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is

fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is

approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that

the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or

monitoring requirements.

EU0820 – Transfer Belt KC-2600

EU0830 – Transfer Belt KC-2620

EU0840 – Clinker Silo KC-2901

EU0850 – Clinker Silo KC-2902

EU0860 – Clinker Silo KC-2903

EU0870 – Transfer Belt KC-2630

EU0880 – Weigh Feeder KC-3002

EU0890 – Weigh Feeder KC-3005

EU0900 – Weigh Feeder KC-3008

EU0910 – Transfer Belt KC-3200

EU0920 – Bucket Elevator KC-3400

EU0930 – Bucket Elevator KC-2550

EU0940 – Transfer Belt KC-3600

The particulate matter emission limit is 63.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a

baghouse. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (300

Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (9.2 lb/Ton) from FIRE for SCC 3-05-006-14, is two

thousand seven hundred sixty (2760) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process

based on a control efficiency of ninety-eight and six tenths percent (98.6%) is thirty eight and

six tenths (38.6) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate

is approximately forty-four (44) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The

controlled emission rate is approximately one and six tenths (1.6) times less than the

allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to

demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU0950 – Truck Loading

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for the

process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42

Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore

there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0960 – Hopper TL-5000

EU0970 – Transfer Belt TL-5300

EU0980 – Transfer Belt TL-5500

EU0990 – Barge Loading

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a fabric

filter. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and

the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC

3-05-006-16, is fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 20

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1000 – Drag Conveyor F-8701

EU1010 – Drag Conveyor F-12701

EU1020 – Elevator F-8702

EU1030 – Elevator F-12701

The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC

3-05-006-16, is six (6) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately nine (9) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no

record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU1040 – Finish Mill F-12900

EU1050 – Finish Mill F-8900

The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector and a cyclone. The cyclone is an integral part of the process and does not act as a

control device. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150

Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (96 lb/Tons) from the Fire Factor for SCC 3-05-006-17, is

14400 lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR and a

controlled emission factor for a fabric filter (0.008 lbs/Ton) is one and two tenths (1.2)

lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately

forty-six (46) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and

monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU1060 – Separator F-13500

EU1070 – Separator F-9500

The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.56 lb/Tons) from the AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-29, is

one hundred ninety-six (196) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on

the a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is ten (10) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly

design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately six (6) times less than the allowable

emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that

the control devices are operating properly.

EU1080 – Hopper for Finish Mill #4

EU1090 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #4

EU1100 – Hopper for Finish Mill#5

EU1110 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #5

EU1220 – EU1370 Old Cement Silos 21 – 36

The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is forty and five tenths

(40.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-five percent

(95%) control efficiency is two and three hundredths (2.03) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly

design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is one and four tenths (1.4) times less than the

allowable emision rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-seven (27)

times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission

rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 21

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1120 – EU1210 New Cement Silos 37-46

The particulate matter emission limit is 54.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with two dust

collectors. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is thirty-seven and eight

tenths (37.8) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-nine and

sixty-four hundredths percent (99.64%) control efficiency is one tenth (0.1) lbs/hr. At the

maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolle emission rate is approximately one and four

tenths (1.4) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is

approximately four hundred (400) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly

unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record

keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU1380 – EU1400 River Cement Silos 47 – 49

The particulate matter emission limit is 66.3 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (400 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is one hundred eight

(108) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-four percent

(94%) control efficiency is six and five tenths (6.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design

rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately one and six tenths (1.6) times greater

than the allowabe emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately ten (10)

times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be

required to demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU1410 – Cement Transfer Belt D-4800

EU1420 – Cement Transfer Belt

EU1430 – Transfer Belt D-4100

EU1440 – Transfer Belt D-4200

The particulate matter emission limit is 74.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with two (2)

dust collectors. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (800

Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is two

hundred sixteen (216) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninetynine and sixty-four hundredths percent (99.64%) control efficiency is seventy-eight

hundredths (0.78) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission

rate is approximately three (3) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate is approximately ninety six (96) times less than the allowable emission rate.

Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control

devices are operating properly.

EU1450 – Barge Loading TL-0800

EU1460 – Distribution Box D-6900

EU1470 – Elevator TL-0400

The particulate matter emission limit is 77.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (1000

Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is two

hundred seventy (270) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is thirteen and five tenths (13.5) lbs/hr. At the

maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three and five

tenths (3.5) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is

approximately six (6) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping

and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating

properly.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 22

Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1480 – Air Slide

The particulate matter emission limit is 74.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (800 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is two hundred sixteen

(216) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-five percent (95%)

control efficiency is ten and eight tenths (10.8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate,

the controlled emission rate is approximately seven (7) times less than the allowable emission

rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the

control devices are operating properly.

EU1490 – Cement Bins (Truck)

EU1500 – Truck Loading

The particulate matter emission limit is 61 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (250 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is sixty-seven and five

tenths (67.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-five

percent (95%) control efficiency is three and four tenths (3.4) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly

design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately eighteen (18) times less than the

allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to

demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU1510 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500

The particulate matter emission limit is 44.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (50 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.4 lb/Tons) from engineering calculations, is 20 lbs/hr. The

controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-four percent (94%) control efficiency

is one and two tenths (1.2) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled

emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore,

no record keeping or monitoring is required.

EU1520 – Truck Unloading

The particulate matter emission limit is 44.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust

collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (50 Tons/Hr)

and the emission factor (0.30 lb/Tons) from the FIRE factor for SCC 3-05-006-12, is fifteen

(15) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-four percent (94%)

control efficiency is nine tenths (0.9) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the

uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission

rate. Therefore, no record keeping or monitoring is required.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Operating Permits

Exempt Emission Units: Combustion equipment that has a capacity of less than ten (10)

MMBTU/Hr heat input by using exclusively natural or liquefied petroleum gas, or any

combination of these; or less than one (1) MMBTU/Hr heat input. The following emission

units are exempt from the requirements of this rule.

Equipment MMBTU/Hr Fuel

2 Space Heaters 0.3 Kerosene

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Screen Three (3) models were ran for the sulfur oxide emissions at the maximum hourly

design rate for the fuel burning stacks. The kiln uses coal, waste derived liquid fuel and
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 23

Project No. 031-0021-023

waste oil with a 2.69% sulfur limit on the waste derived liquid fuel (WDLF) and waste oil from

construction permit number: 0392-001. The process heaters, raw mills and back-up

generator use #2 fuel oil, which has a sulfur limit of 0.5%. The space heater uses kerosene.

The maximum one-(1) hour concentration of the stacks were calculated as follows:

Maximum 1-Hr Max. Annual

Equipment Conc. (μg/m3) Conc. (μg/m3)

Process Heater C-1400 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.06 0.005

Process Heater C-2800 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.06 0.005

Raw Mill Heater R-4601 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.18 0.014

Raw Mill Heater R-4602 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.18 0.014

Total 0.48 0.038

It was assumed that with the equipment listed above, the two (2) space Heaters (Kerosene)

and two (2) Back-up Generators (#2 Fuel Oil) that the Maximum Annual Concentration

would not exceed 0.5 μg/m3.

Screen Three (3) models were then ran on the kiln for the 2.69% WDLF and waste oil and for

5%, 6.8% and 6.6%. The maximum one-(1) hour concentration of the stacks were calculated

as follows:

Maximum 1-Hr Max. Annual

Equipment Conc. (μg/m3) Conc. (μg/m3)

Kiln – 2.69% WDLF 129 10.32

Kiln – 2.69% Waste Oil 129 10.32

Kiln – 5% Coal 549.3 43.94

Kiln – 6.8% Coal 747 59.76

Kiln – 6.6% Coal 725.1 58.08

Totals with 5% Coal 807.8 64.62

Totals with 6.8% Coal 1005.5 80.44

Totals with 6.6% Coal 983.6 78.69

The maximum concentration of the stacks together with 6.6% sulfur content value of the coal

(78.69 μg/m3) is ninety-eight percent (98%) of the annual ambient air level for sulfur dioxide

(80 μg/m3). It is highly unlikely that the units will exceed the emission limitation or the

ambient air level when the sulfur content of the fuels is as follows: coal - 6.6% by weight,

WDLF and waste oil - 2.69% by weight and the #2 fuel oil units - 0.5% by weight. Therefore,

an emission limitation on the sulfur contents of the fuels will be placed in the permit and the

record keeping will be required for the sulfur contents. However, if additional fuel burning

units are placed at the installation the sulfur content limit of the coal will have to be re-examined.

September 24, 1990 Settlement Agreement between Missouri Department of Natural

Resources, Attorney General and Lone Star Industries, Inc.

The settlement agreement established a timeline for the installation of a new system

of air flows through various processes at the cement plant to reduce the number of

previous excess emissions. The installation has completed the installation of the air

flow system and therefore the requirements of the September 24, 1990, Settlement

Agreement were not included in the operating permit.
Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 24

Project No. 031-0021-023

Other Regulations Not Cited in the Operating Permit or the Above Statement of Basis

Any regulation which is not specifically listed in either the Operating Permit or in the above

Statement of Basis does not appear, based on this review, to be an applicable requirement for this

installation for one (1) or more of the following reasons:

1. The specific pollutant regulated by that rule is not emitted by the installation;

2. The installation is not in the source category regulated by that rule;

3. The installation is not in the county or specific area that is regulated under the authority of that

rule;

4. The installation does not contain the type of emission unit which is regulated by that rule;

5. The rule is only for administrative purposes.

Should a later determination conclude that the installation is subject to one (1) or more of the

regulations cited in this Statement of Basis or other regulations which were not cited, the

installation shall determine and demonstrate, to the APCP's satisfaction, the installation's

compliance with that regulation(s). If the installation is not in compliance with a regulation which

was not previously cited, the installation shall submit to the APCP a schedule for achieving

compliance for that regulation(s).

Prepared by:

Pamela Muren

Environmental Engineer
Lone Star Industries, Inc.

300 First Stamford Place

Stamford, CT 06912

Re: Lone Star Industries, Inc.

Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, Cape Girardeau County

Permit Number:

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed with this letter is your operating permit. Please review this document carefully.

Operation of your installation in accordance with the rules and regulations cited in this document

is necessary for continued compliance.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this permit, please contact the

Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) at (573) 751-4817, or you may write to the Department

of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond

Permit Section Chief

RER:pmk

Enclosures

c: US EPA Region VII

Southeast Regional Office

PATs File: 031-0021-023
August 8, 2000

Dennis Dobson CERTIFIED MAIL: Z 445 169 053

Lone Star Industries, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

300 First Stamford Place

Stamford, CT 06912

Re: Draft Title V Operating Permit – Project No.: 031-0021-023

Dear Dobson:

The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has completed the preliminary review of your Title V

permit application. A public notice will be placed in the Southeast Missourian on August 13, 2000.

The conditions and monitoring requirements of the draft permit are open for comment by the public

and you until September 12, 2000. Standard permit wording (i.e. General Requirements) is not open

for comment, since these provisions are required by law and regulation.

The APCP will accept comments regarding the conditions and monitoring regulations that are

postmarked on or before the closing date. Please address comments or recommendations for changes

to my attention at:

Operating Permits Unit

Air Pollution Control Program

P.O. Box 176

Jefferson City, MO 65102

A copy of this draft has also been sent to the U.S. EPA’s Region VII office in Kansas City for their

review. The Region VII office is afforded, by law, oversight authority on any Title V permit which

Missouri (or any of the other states in the region) may propose to issue. A public hearing may be held

if sufficient interest is expressed by the public.

Should you have any questions, or wish clarification on any items in this draft permit, please feel free

to contact me at (573) 751-4817.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Pamela Muren

Environmental Engineer

PM/blw

Enclosures

c: PATS File
August 8, 2000

Allen Elliot

Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection

Division of Air Quality

803 Schenkel Lane

Frankfort, KY 40601

RE: Affected States Review – Notification of Proposed Final Part 70 Operating Permit

Dear Mr. Elliot:

In accordance with Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(F)1. and the Clean Air Act this letter is to

notify you of public notice of the preliminary draft and request for comments for:

Lone Star Industries, Inc., Cape Girardeau, MO 63701

Project Number - 031-0021-023

Public notice will be published in the Southeast Missourian, Cape Girardeau on August 13, 2000.

You are invited to submit any relevant information, materials, and views in support of or in opposition

to the draft operating permits in writing by no later than September 12, 2000 to my attention at

Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson

City, MO 65102.

Should you require further information or documentation on this matter, please contact the Operating

Permits Unit at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond

Permit Section Chief

RER:pmb