alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                       139
<INVENTORY>                                      9,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,110
<PP&E>                                           7,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,423
<BONDS>                                            187
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,467
<SALES>                                         60,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,325
<CGS>                                           45,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,847
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
### §297g. Modification of agreements; compromise, waiver or release

The Secretary may agree to modifications of agreements made under this part, and may compromise, waive, or release any right, title, claim, or demand of the United States arising or acquired under this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §840, formerly §828, as added Pub. L. 88–581, §2, Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 917; renumbered §840 and amended Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §941(h)(1), (4)(C), (i)(1), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 365; Pub. L. 111–148, title V, §5310(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 631.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–148 substituted "this part" for "this subpart" in two places.

1975—Pub. L. 94–63, §941(h)(1), (4)(C), substituted "subpart" for "part" in two places and struck out "or loans" after "agreements".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–63 effective July 1, 1975, see section 942 of Pub. L. 94–63, set out as a note under section 297a of this title.
Case 3:08-cv-04787-MEJ Document 29 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04787-MEJ Document 29 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 3
March 1, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04787-MEJ Document 29 Filed 03/01/10 Page 3 of 3
Case3:07-cv-05642-BZ Document201-1 Filed06/14/10 Page1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ Document 94 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tice
Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as amended and restated and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles R. West, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Charles R. West                                  
|                        |  | Charles R. West, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
#### Dress Shirt Sales, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Hotel Martinique Associates, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Order entered on September 12,1961 unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements and the motion for summary judgment, made pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, granted, with $10 costs to the appellants. This determination is without prejudice to any action respondent may be advised to bring based upon any tenable theory not included in the present pleading. Respondent tenant, the occupant of certain premises owned by appellant, moved out while its lease was still operative. Respondent offered a prospective tenant to the appellant landlord, which was refused, and thereafter respondent paid a consideration of $30,000 for cancellation of its lease. Approximately 16 days later appellant entered a new lease with the prospect produced by respondent and the associates of such prospect. Respondent instituted this action, seeking recovery of the $30,000 and rent paid subsequent to the introduction of the prospective tenant to appellant. The lease contained a valid provision against oral modification or waiver (Real Property Law, § 282, subds. 1, 5), and also a blanket provision against assignment or subletting without the written consent of the landlord. Under the provision prohibiting assignment without landlord’s written consent the landlord could refuse to cancel the lease for any reason or no reason at all *(Ogden*v. *Riverview Holding,*134 Misc. 149, affd. 226 App. Div. 882; *Symonds*v. *Hurlbut,*208 App. Div. 147). Or landlord could, as was done here, condition the cancellation upon payment of a specified sum *(Durand*v. *Lipman,*165 Misc. 615, 621). Whatever might be the view as to the moral aspect of appellant's conduct, it is clear that there was no legal obligation breached by the execution of the new lease. Respondent had not been induced by appellant to vacate the premises, but had moved out of its own accord, and the lease between appellant and respondent had been cancelled when appellant entered into a lease with its new tenant. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §4594. Contract authority in appropriation Acts

The authority of the Secretary to enter into contracts under this chapter shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance by appropriation Acts.

(Pub. L. 91–616, title VI, §604, as added Pub. L. 96–180, §17, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1306.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–616, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1848, known as the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4541 of this title and Tables.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALERIE GEORGE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., 

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-08-02675 EDL

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 

On July 7, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Order Authorizing Compromise of Minors’

Claims and Appointing Valerie George as Guardian Ad Litem. On that date, the parties also filed a

Stipulation re: Shortening Time for Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion. Good cause appearing, the Court

grants the stipulated request to shorten time, and sets the following briefing and hearing schedule. 

Any party may file a response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Authorizing Compromise of

Minors’ Claims and Appointing Valerie George as Guardian Ad Litem no later than July 13, 2010. 

A hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion is scheduled for July 20, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will notify the

parties if a hearing is not necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 8, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02675-EDL Document 315 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 1
#### I. Burack, Inc., Respondent, v. Metropolitan Plumbing Supply Corp., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages claimed to be the result of the sale of defective pipe, defendant appeals: (1) from a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 18, 1960, denying its motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the amended complaint, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that said cause is barred by the Statute of Limitations; and (2) from the original order of said court, entered July 12, 1960. Resettled order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. By this decision we hold only that the second cause of action as pleaded in the present amended complaint, while it sets forth an additonal cause of action, is not based on new facts. It is based, rather, on the same facts alleged in the original complaint, which fully apprised defendant of the nature of the claim. This decision is not to be construed as precluding defendant from urging upon the trial its defense of the Statute of Limitations pleaded in its answer. The appeal from the original order is dismissed as academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4415 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4415

     To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain undyed 
                       polyacrylonitrile staple.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain undyed 
                       polyacrylonitrile staple.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNDYED POLYACRYLONITRILE STAPLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain undyed 
polyacrylonitrile staple) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Irene R. Lacks, Respondent, v. Harold G. Lacks, Appellant.

Order, entered on February 17, 1961, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. -Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                  Lason, Inc.
                 Computation of Consolidated Per Share Earnings
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                                   March 31,
                                                                               ------------------
                                                                               1997          1996
                                                                               ----          ----
<S>                                                                            <C>          <C>
Net income                                                                     $1,893      $  767
                                                                               ======      ======

Primary and Fully Diluted
     weighted average common shares outstanding                                 8,694       5,003

Assumed exercise of stock options using
     the treasury stock method                                                    368         493

Common shares redeemed on October 15, 1996                                        -           692

Weighted average common shares outstanding
     and common share equivalents for primary                                  ------      ------
     and fully diluted earnings per share                                       9,062       6,188


Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                                   $ 0.21      $ 0.12
                                                                               ======      ======
</TABLE>
### §292n. Additional requirements for institutions and lenders

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, the Secretary is authorized to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to provide for—

(1) a fiscal audit of an eligible institution with regard to any funds obtained from a borrower who has received a loan insured under this subpart;

(2) the establishment of reasonable standards of financial responsibility and appropriate institutional capability for the administration by an eligible institution of a program of student financial aid with respect to funds obtained from a student who has received a loan insured under this subpart;

(3) the limitation, suspension, or termination of the eligibility under this subpart of any otherwise eligible institution, whenever the Secretary has determined, after notice and affording an opportunity for hearing, that such institution has violated or failed to carry out any regulation prescribed under this subpart;

(4) the collection of information from the borrower, lender, or eligible institution to assure compliance with the provisions of section 292d of this title;

(5) the assessing of tuition or fees to borrowers in amounts that are the same or less than the amount of tuition and fees assessed to nonborrowers;

(6) the submission, by the institution or the lender to the Office of Health Education Assistance Loan Default Reduction, of information concerning each loan made under this subpart, including the date when each such loan was originated, the date when each such loan is sold, the identity of the loan holder and information concerning a change in the borrower's status;

(7) the withholding of services, including academic transcripts, financial aid transcripts, and alumni services, by an institution from a borrower upon the default of such borrower of a loan under this subpart, except in case of a borrower who has filed for bankruptcy; and

(8) the offering, by the lender to the borrower, of a variety of repayment options, including fixed-rate, graduated repayment with negative amortization permitted, and income dependent payments for a limited period followed by level monthly payments.

#### (b) Recording by institution of information on students

The Secretary shall require an eligible institution to record, and make available to the lender and to the Secretary upon request, the name, address, postgraduate destination, and other reasonable identifying information for each student of such institution who has a loan insured under this subpart.

#### (c) Workshop for student borrowers

Each participating eligible institution must have, at the beginning of each academic year, a workshop concerning the provisions of this subpart that all student borrowers shall be required to attend.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §715, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, §102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2009.)
#### International Hormones, Inc., Respondent, v Safeco Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

In an action, *inter alia,*to declare that the defendant is obligated to defend the plaintiff-respondent, its insured, in a certain action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 8, 1975, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The respondent, International Hormones, Inc., manufactured hormone suspensions which were sold to Bel-Mar Laboratories, Inc. (BelMar), which then transferred the suspensions to vials, into which other materials were allegedly inserted. The resulting product was then resold to medical facilities for use in injections. The Federal Food and Drug Administration (F. D. A.) ordered a recall of Bel-Mar’s products because they were *not*sterile. Bel-Mar then sued respondent, claiming a breach of various express and implied warranties in that the suspensions provided by it were not sterile, thus leading to the recall by the F. D. A. Respondent sought to have its insurance carrier, appellant Safeco Insurance Company of America, defend the suit by Bel-Mar. Appellant denied coverage, citing various exclusionary clauses in the insurance contract between the parties. Respondent then sued appellant, seeking a declaration that the latter was obligated to defend the suit brought by Bel-Mar. Respondent moved for summary judgment and the motion was granted by Special Term. The first exclusionary clause referred to by appellant applies where the insured’s product is withdrawn from the market. However, clauses identical to this one have been held to be operative only where the withdrawal is by the insured party itself, and not, as here, where the product is recalled by a third party (see *Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*34 NY2d 356). The second exclusionary clause invoked by appellant applies to damages resulting from a failure of the product in question to function or perform as intended by the insured. This provision does not apply where the product has become a part of, or has been integrated into, another product of a third party (see *Sturges Mfg. Co. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co.,*37 NY2d 69). The parties present conflicting factual arguments as to whether Bel-Mar added anything to the suspensions provided by respondent. This dispute can only be determined at the trial of the action commenced by Bel-Mar and does not relieve appellant of its duty to defend. Finally, it is entirely possible that Bel-Mar will successfully establish damages to its property. Appellant has failed to establish that the loss sustained by Bel-Mar is completely within the exclusionary clauses of the policy. Since the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify, appellant should not be excused from defending the action brought against its insured. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>                                                                        
<S> <C> 
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 11
</TABLE> 
                          MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                         (000s, except per share data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                             For the quarter ended           For the six months ended
                                                                 June 30, 1998                      June 30, 1998
                                                        ------------------------------     ----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                                <C> 
 
Net income                                                 $                    (1,140)      $                     (223)

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                                8,500                            8,498

Basic earnings per share                                   $                     (0.13)      $                    (0.03)
                                                        ==============================     ============================

Net income                                                                      (1,140)                            (223)

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                                8,500                            8,498
Dilutive stock options                                                             122                              133
                                                        ------------------------------     ----------------------------
                                                                                 8,622                            8,631

Earnings per share assuming dilution                       $                     (0.13)      $                    (0.03)
                                                        ==============================     ============================

</TABLE>