alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§5551 to 5556. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3006(e)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2513

Section 5551, Pub. L. 93–473, §2, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1431, related to congressional declaration of findings and policy.

Section 5552, Pub. L. 93–473, §3, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1431, defined terms for this subchapter.

Section 5553, Pub. L. 93–473, §4, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1432, related to the Solar Energy Coordination and Management Project.

Section 5554, Pub. L. 93–473, §5, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1433, related to solar energy resource determination and assessment program, objectives, and implementation.

Section 5555, Pub. L. 93–473, §6, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1433, related to research and development program.

Section 5556, Pub. L. 93–473, §7, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1434, related to solar energy demonstration facilities program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3006(e)(2), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2513, provided that: "The repeal of the Solar Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.) under paragraph (1) shall not affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy to conduct research and development on solar energy."
Exhibit 10.19


Certain portions of this Exhibit
have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidentiality.  Such omitted portions, which are marked with
brackets [  ] and an asterisk *, have been
separately filed with the Commission.


AMENDMENT No. 1 TO 

RUSH PAYMENTS AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of October 27, 2003, by and
between Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (“Acorda”) and Elan Corporation, plc.
(“Elan”) amends the Rush Payments Agreement effective as of September 26, 2003
(the “Payments Agreement”) by and between Acorda and Elan.


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, Acorda and Elan desire to amend certain provisions
relating to the timing of payments under the Payments Agreement upon the terms
and conditions set forth herein;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein,
and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.             Paragraph 2 (a) of the Payments Agreement is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“(a)        
Each of Acorda and Elan shall be responsible for [**]
of any milestone payments payable to Rush under Section 5.2 (a) or 5.2 (b) of
the Rush/Acorda License. Accordingly, if the milestone events set forth in
either Section 5.2 (a) or Section 5.2 (b) of the Rush/Acorda License are
achieved, (x) Acorda shall so advise Elan in writing upon achievement of the
applicable milestone event, and (y) Elan shall pay Acorda an amount equal to [**]of the applicable milestone payment within twenty-five
(25) days after receipt of such notice as Elan’s share of such payment.”


2.             Paragraph 2 (b) of the Payments Agreement is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“(b)        
Elan shall be responsible for [**] of any milestone
payments payable to Rush under Section 5.2 (c) of the Rush/Acorda License.
Accordingly, if the milestone event set forth in Section 5.2 (c) of the
Rush/Acorda License is achieved, Acorda shall so advise Elan in writing upon
achievement of the applicable milestone event and Elan shall pay Acorda an
amount equal to [**] of the applicable milestone
payment within twenty-five (25) days after receipt of such notice.”


3.             Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of
the provisions of the Payments Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.  All references to the Payments
Agreement, from and after the date hereof, shall be to the Payments Agreement
as amended by this Amendment.












4.             This Amendment may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above.


Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Ron Cohen

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Ron Cohen

  
	
  Title:

  	
  President and CEO

  



 


Elan Corporation, plc.


	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Pieter Bosse/Klaas van Blanken

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Monksland Holdings BV

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Proxyholder

  



 


 


 


2
### §300n–2. Requirement of submission of application

The Secretary may not make a grant under section 300k of this title unless an application for the grant is submitted to the Secretary, the application contains the description of intended uses required in section 300n–1 of this title, and the application is in such form, is made in such manner, and contains such agreements, assurances, and information as the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XV, §1506, as added Pub. L. 101–354, §2, Aug. 10, 1990, 104 Stat. 414.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300n–2, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XV, §1533, as added Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–641, §3, 88 Stat. 2253, provided for technical assistance to health systems agencies and State agencies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–660, title VII, §701(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3799, effective Jan. 1, 1987.
#### ANDREWS, Respondent, v. ALASKA PACKERS’ ASS’N et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action, by Manuel Andrews, as administrator, etc., against the Alaska Packers’ Association and the J. K. Armsby Company.

PER CURIAM.

We think that the plaintiff has failed to bring himself within the rule which relieves him from the obligation of filing security for costs, as the complaint is unverified, and there is no affidavit produced on his behalf tending to establish his right of action. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disburse-, ments, and motion granted, without costs.
NO. 07-03-0546-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	FEBRUARY 13, 2004

	______________________________

	BETTY ANN NEWBY, APPELLANT

	V.

	SHERIA EVANS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE

	ESTATE OF GEORGE RALPH NEWBY, JR., DECEASED; DAN MOSER

	INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR MOSER AND STUBBLEFIELD

	INVESTMENTS; MOSER INVESTMENTS , APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

	NO. 35,150; HONORABLE JACK YOUNG, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.  

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On December 30, 2003, the clerk of this court received a copy of a Notice of Appeal  filed on behalf of appellant Betty Ann Newby.  By letter dated January 5, 2004, the clerk advised appellant that a filing fee had not been received, see Tex. R. App. P. 5, nor had a docketing statement been filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1.  The clerk’s letter likewise advised that no further action would be taken on the appeal by this Court until a filing fee had been paid and that failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 

	The filing fee was not paid.  By letter dated January 22, 2004, the clerk advised counsel for appellant that the filing fee had still not been paid, and that unless the filing fee was received on or before February 2, 2004, the appeal would be subject to dismissal. 

 	The filing fee has not been paid.  Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

						Phil Johnson

						Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 10.2

       LOAN AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 31, 2005 BETWEEN CITIC INDUSTRIAL BANK,
             ZHENGHOU BRANCH AND HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD SHARE CO., LTD.

             The CITIC Industrial Bank provided a loan in the amount of RMB
20,000,000.00 to Henan Zhongpin Food Share Co., Ltd. to be used by the borrower
as its working capital, with an interest rate of 5.859% per annum and a term of
one year from the date of the agreement.
### §5612. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5612 was editorially reclassified as section 11112 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### HIRSH v. AMERICAN DIST. TELEGRAPH CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Assignments—Witnesses—Interest—Evidence.

Where, in an action on an assigned claim, defendant denied that plaintiff was the assignee thereof, and the assignor was plaintiff’s only witness, it was error to refuse to permit such assignor to be asked on cross-examination whether he was still interested in the result of the suit, to show his interest as a witness.

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by Morris J. Hirsh against American District Telegraph Company. From a City Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

See 90 N. Y. Supp. 464.

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

George H. Fearons, for appellant.

Herbert H. Maass, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

The defendant, in its answer, denied that the plaintiff was the assignee of the claim upon which this action is based. The assignor, the plaintiff’s only witness, was cross-examined by the defendant’s counsel as follows:

> “Q. You have assigned this claim, as I understand? A. Yes, sir. Q. You are still interested in the result of this suit, are you not? Plaintiff’s Counsel: I object to that. (Objection sustained.) Defendant’s Counsel: I wish to show /his interest as a witness; that is all. The Court: I sustain the objection. (Exception.) Q. Have you assigned this under an arrangement by which the result of the suit will affect whether it amounts to the payment or not on a transaction? Plaintiff’s Counsel: Objected to on. the ground that it Is incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. (Objection sustained: Exception.)”

This cross-examination was proper, as tending to show that the plaintiff was an interested witness. It related to the weight and credibility of his testimony, and was therefore proper matter for submission to the jury. The exceptions by the defendant’s counsel to the exclusion of this cross-examination were well taken, and discloses a material error, which calls for the reversal of the judgment. Vaughn v. Westover, 2 Hun, 43; Cady v. Bradshaw, 116 N. Y. 188, 22 N. E. 371, 5 L. R. A. 557.

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event All concur.
Case 3:08-cv-01770-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/08/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:08-cv-01770-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/08/10   Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION
     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofOn Command Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2001 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Amendment”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, does herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge, theAmendment fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Act of 1934.    Date: October 24, 2003 By: /s/ ChristopherSophinos      Christopher Sophinos   President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal   Executive Officer)    Date: October 24, 2003 By: /s/ Bernard G. Dvorak      Bernard G. Dvorak   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part ofAmendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1117 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CUSTOMS 

Assistance 

 Memorandum of Understanding between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Jakarta November 17, 2006 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDONESIA 

 Customs: Assistance 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Jakarta November 17, 2006; 

 Entered into force November 17, 2006.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2573 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2573

      To suspend temporarily the duty on cuprammonium rayon yarn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

Mr. Barrett of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on cuprammonium rayon yarn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CUPRAMMONIUM RAYON YARN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Multifilament yarn  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         of cuprammonium                                                    31/2010
                         rayon (other than
                         sewing thread),
                         untwisted, not
                         dyed or finished,
                         not put up for
                         retail sale
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         5403.39.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 521.17 Rights of parties. Except as otherwise limited by this part, all parties may: ( a ) Be accompanied, represented, and advised by a representative;
( b ) Participate in any conference held by the ALJ;
( c ) Conduct discovery;
( d ) Agree to stipulations of fact or law, which shall be made part of the record;
( e ) Present evidence relevant to the issues at the hearing;
( f ) Present and cross-examine witnesses;
( g ) Present oral arguments at the hearing as permitted by the ALJ; and
( h ) Submit written briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law after the hearing.
§ 1429.23 Extension; waiver. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the Board or General Counsel, or their designated representatives, as appropriate, may extend any time limit provided in this subchapter for good cause shown, and shall notify the parties of any such extension. Requests for extensions of time shall be filed in writing no later than five (5) days before the established time limit for filing, shall state the position of the other parties on the request for extension, and shall be served on the other parties.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the Board or General Counsel, or their designated representatives, as appropriate, may waive any expired time limit in this subchapter in extraordinary circumstances. Request for a waiver of time limits shall state the position of the other parties and shall be served on the other parties.
( c ) The time limits established in this subchapter may not be extended or waived in any manner other than that described in this subchapter.
( d ) The time limits prescribed by 22 U.S.C. 4114(c) may not be waived.
### §3796a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796a was editorially reclassified as section 10282 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3796a, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §702, as added Pub. L. 94–430, §2, Sept. 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 1347, contained provisions similar to those in section 10282 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157.
#### Maydole Hammer Corporation v. Lawrence Warehouse Company et al.

Motion for enlargement of time granted insofar as to extend the plaintiff-appellant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including February 16, 1961, with notice of argument for February 28, 1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The order of this court, entered on September 22,1960, is modified accordingly. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
§ 146.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 146.500 through 146.550.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER REGARDING MOTION

TO OPT OUT BY CLASS

MEMBERS DAVID SHANNON

AND JOAN SHANNON 

Counsel shall respond to the motion to extend the opt-out period filed by class members

David Shannon and Joan Shannon BY NOON ON THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 757 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 518.72 Subsequent adjustments and continuing responsibilities. ( a ) The closeout of an award does not affect any of the following. ( 1 ) The right of the Federal awarding agency to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review.
( 2 ) The obligation of the recipient to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions.
( 3 ) Audit requirements in § 518.26.
( 4 ) Property management requirements in §§ 518.31 through 518.37.
( 5 ) Records retention as required in § 518.53.
( b ) After closeout of an award, a relationship created under an award may be modified or ended in whole or in part with the consent of the Federal awarding agency and the recipient, provided the responsibilities of the recipient referred to in § 518.73(a), including those for property management as applicable, are considered and provisions made for continuing responsibilities of the recipient, as appropriate.
#### (A) In the Matter of Manor Park Development, Inc., Appellant, v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondent. (B) Dorothy M. Tait, Respondent, v. Lattingtown Harbor Development Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

[In each action] Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant [s] perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the January Term, beginning January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 12,1960. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27226]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2004 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 72111]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No.FAA-2004-19332; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-61]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Hartington, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Hartington, NE.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 29, 2004 
(69 FR 63057). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on December 1, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-27226 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### §4225. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068

Section, Pub. L. 90–577, title III, §305, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1103, provided for the reservation of existing authority of Federal departments and agencies with respect to furnishing services to State and local units of government. See section 6505(d) of Title 31, Money and Finance.