alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11

ALLIN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months       Three Months       Nine Months       Nine Months
                                                               Ended              Ended              Ended             Ended
                                                           September 30,       September 30,     September 30,      September 30,
                                                                1995              1996                1995             1996
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>               <C>                <C>

Net loss                                                     $       (317)     $   (2,096)       $    (1,189)       $   (4,609)
                                                             ============      ==========        ===========        ==========
Net loss per common share                                    $      (0.13)     $    (0.81)       $     (0.46)       $    (1.77)
                                                             ============      ==========        ===========        ==========
                                                                                                                
Weighted average common shares outstanding                                                                      
     during the period (1)                                      2,400,000       2,400,000          2,400,000         2,400,000
                                                                                                                
Effective of conversion of preferred stock                                                                      
     issued within one year of the offering                       203,385         203,385            203,385           203,385
                                                             ------------      ----------        -----------        ----------
Shares used in calculating net loss per common                                                                  
     share                                                      2,603,385       2,603,385          2,603,385         2,603,385
                                                             ============      ==========        ===========        ==========
</TABLE>

(1)  The weighted average common shares outstanding has been retroactively
     restated for the effect of the 2,400 for 1 stock split.
#### Samuel Eichenbaum and Others v. Stephen H. Jackson.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellants comply with terms stated in order. Present —■ Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Common tracks and scat found atWhite Sands**
 
2012 | 2015 | 2017| 2021| 2022
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21:W 58/18/
Item Number:0650 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104297
 
August 26, 2019
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY NGO WU,

Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 08-4558 MMC (PR)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

On September 30, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at the

Correctional Training Facility, Soledad, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2006 decision by the

California Board of Prison Hearings (“Board”) to deny petitioner parole. Respondent has

filed an answer to the petition and petitioner has filed a traverse.

A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit addresses important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions. See Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th

Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). Consequently, the parties will be directed to file

supplemental briefs setting forth their respective views as to the effect, if any, of the

Hayward en banc decision on the Court’s determination of the instant petition.

Case 3:08-cv-04558-MMC Document 10 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than ten days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall send to

petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than twenty days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall file

and serve on petitioner a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Hayward on the instant

action. 

3. No later than twenty days from the date respondent’s supplemental brief is

filed, petitioner shall file and serve on respondent either a supplemental brief addressing the

impact of Hayward on the instant action or a notice that he does not intend to file such a

brief.

4. The parties’ respective supplemental briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages in length.

5. The matter will be deemed submitted on the date petitioner’s supplemental brief is

due. No extensions of time will be granted to file the supplemental briefs absent a showing

of exceptional circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04558-MMC Document 10 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006 (the
"Report"),  I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006
                                                          /s/ George P. Morris
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George P. Morris
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
November 19, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for information dated November 03, 2015 for docket number FAA

- 2015

- 3079.

We never received this email requesting the additional info due to badly se t up email account on our end. T his information request was not posted to our docket so we will post it with this letter.

We do not need to have the ability to perform closed set filming, we do not have a MPTOM (Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual).

WE WISH TO PROCEED W ITHOUT THIS MANUAL AND TO REMOVE CLOSED

- SET FILMING FROM OUR PROPOSED OPERATION.

Orsolya Soos Zsigmond (Our complete info is below)

The name and address of the applicant is: Sky View Pros, Inc. President Orsolya Soos Zsigmond (blackpawphoto@gmail.com , T: 917

- 547

- 7292) 806 Brighton Avenue Staten Island, NY 10301

Additionally, the applicant will conduct all UAS operations under the direct control or supervision of an FAA certificated airman. The airman's certificate numbers will be forwarded to supp ort this petition in a confidential document via post if requested by the FAA. The name and address of that airman is as follows:

Pilot Name: Anthony Caccamo
FAA Certificates held: Commercial Pilot: Airplane Single & Multiengine Land; Instrument Airplain e. BE

- 400 MU

- 300 Type Ratings. Flight Instructor: Airplane Single Engine; Instrument Airplane.

Address: 806 Brighton Avenue Staten Island, NY 10301
Seminoe
Reservoir

Medicine Bow

|

Se

CARBON

: SWEETWATER

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern

1. Sand Hills 0 10 20 40 60 80 100
2 Blowout Penstemon Kilometers
3 Shirley Mountain Bat Cave
o 5 10 20 30 40 50
Miles

Map 2-9
Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern

NO WARRANTY iS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM Alternative 4
#### Joseph Harry Lukach, Appellant, v. Harry P. Reigart and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—• Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Leslie Robins,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                         /S/ LESLIE ROBINS
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         November 11, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of John T. Mott and David P. Morehouse, as Executors, etc., of Wardwell G. Robinson, Deceased.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 240.4 Guarantee eligibility. ( a ) Eligible Notes only are guaranteed hereunder. Notes in order to achieve Eligible Note status: ( 1 ) Must be signed on behalf of the Borrower, manually or in facsimile, by a duly authorized representative of the Borrower;
( 2 ) Must contain a certificate of authentication manually executed by the Fiscal Agent whose appointment by the Borrower is consented to by USAID in the Fiscal Agency Agreement; and
( 3 ) Shall be approved and authenticated by USAID by either: ( i ) The affixing by USAID on the Notes of a guarantee legend incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID; or
( ii ) The delivery by USAID to the Fiscal Agent of a guarantee certificate incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID.
( b ) The authorized USAID representatives for purposes of the regulations in this part whose signature(s) shall be binding on USAID shall include the USAID Chief and Deputy Chief Financial Officer; Assistant Administrator and Deputy Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and Environment; Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Europe and Eurasia; Director and Deputy Director, Office of Development Credit; and such other individual(s) designated in a certificate executed by an authorized USAID Representative and delivered to the Fiscal Agent. The certificate of authentication of the Fiscal Agent issued pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall, when manually executed by the Fiscal Agent, be conclusive evidence binding on USAID that an Eligible Note has been duly executed on behalf of the Borrower and delivered.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27963]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
21, 2005.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Individual MCJROTC Instructor 
Evaluation Summary; NAVMC 10942; OMB Control Number 0703-0016.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 450.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 450.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 225.
    Needs and Uses: This form provides a written record of the overall 
performance of duty of Marine instructors who are responsible for 
implementing the Marine Corps Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps 
(MCJROTC). The Individual MCJROTC Instructor Evaluation Summary is 
completed by principals to evaluate the effectiveness of individual 
Marine instructors. The form is further used as a performance related 
counseling tool and as a record of service performance to document 
performance and growth of individual marine instructors. Evaluating the 
performance of instructors is essential in ensuring that they provide 
quality training.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligations: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis Oleinick.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Oleinick at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: December 15, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-27963 Filed 12-21[dash]04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06--M
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 18, 2008





*/s/
                George P. Morris*George
                P. MorrisChief
                Financial Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 10.10 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
FIRST AMENDED & RESTATED REAL PROPERTY SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
DATED JUNE 1, 2004
BETWEEN
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
AND
BRILLIAN CORPORATION THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE FIRST AMENDED & RESTATED REAL PROPERTY SUBLEASE
AGREEMENT(Amendment) is entered into as of the 12th day of July, 2004, by
and between BRILLIAN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation whose principle place
of business is located at 1600 North Desert Drive, Tempe, AZ, 85281
(hereinafter referred to as Brillian) and THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC., a
Delaware, U.S.A. corporation, with its principle place of business located at
1600 North Desert Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85281 (hereinafter referred to as
TFS). RECITALS A. On September 1, 2003, TFS and Brillian entered into a Real Property
Sublease Agreement (the Original Agreement), whereby TFS leased certain
property, and provided certain services to Brillian. B. On June 1, 2004, TFS and Brillian amended the Original Agreement and
entered into the First Amended and Restated Real Property Sublease Agreement
(Restated Agreement). C. TFS and Brillian now wish to amend the Restated Agreement. In consideration of the foregoing recitals and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Section 3(b). Building Services Rent The Base Sublease Rent is hereby reduced by $35,000 USD per annum or
$2,916.67 per month. This reduction takes into account that the TFS Facilities
Manager will no longer be providing any services to Brillian. Prior to this,
TFS Facility Manager was devoting approximately one-half of his working time
to Brillian services. TFS was charging Brillian $35,000 USD per annum or
$2,916.67 per month (1/2 the cost of TFS Facility Managers salary) for those
services. Brillian now wishes to perform those services solely by itself. As
a result Brillians annual Base Sublease Rent of $202,884 shall be reduced to
$167,884. Brillians monthly installments shall be reduced from $16,907 to
$13,990.33. 2. Exhibit D (Building Services) Line item Number 1 described as, Salaries, Benefits, Taxes, shall be
deleted in its entirety. 3. Modification of Agreement To the extent that this Amendment No. 1 conflicts with the Restated
Agreement, this Amendment No. 1 shall control. Otherwise, the Restated
Agreement and this Amendment No. 1 will be considered as one document, and all
other terms and conditions in the Restated Agreement shall remain applicable.




---



##### 



The parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
    
    BRILLIAN CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ George Pisaruk
    
    Name:
    
    /s/ Korbi McDonaldName: George Pisaruk
    
    Address: 1600 N. Desert Drive, Tempe, AZ 85281Its: General Counsel
    
    Date: 8/12/04
 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE

RE VOLUMINOUS MOTIONS

Both sides filed many summary judgment motions. The Court has been patiently working

its way through them and has now issued four separate orders on them. By 9:00 A.M. FRIDAY,

APRIL 9, please advise the Court which, if any, remaining motions counsel truly needs an order

on, even if abbreviated, with one sentence each explaining why it cannot wait until the charging

conference or at least until the final pretrial conference. Do not use this as an opportunity to

submit more argument or authorities or evidence. One page will do. 

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02983-WHA Document 31 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

QUEZADA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RESPONSIBLE ROOFING, et al.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-0821 EMC

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR

PLAINTIFFS FEDERICO QUEZADA

AND ANTONIO QUEZADA TO

ATTEND THE MEDIATION

TELEPHONICALLY

Date: April 19, 2010

Mediator: Suzanne Nusbaum

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for plaintiffs Federico Quezada and Antonio

Quezada to be excused from personally attending the April 19, 2010 mediation session before

Suzanne Nusbaum is GRANTED. Both Messrs. Quezada shall be available to participate by

telephone at all times in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(f).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ counsel Adam Wang shall obtain appropriate

written authorization to execute settlement documentation on behalf of Federico Quezada and/or

Antonio Quezada in the event the matter is resolved at the mediation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 19, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00821-EMC Document 74 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ronald R. Helm, ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Pacific Biometrics, Inc., certify that:

1.  This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. That the information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 14, 2002

|  
/s/ RONALD R. HELM

 
 
 
 
**Ronald R. Helm Chief Executive Officer**

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|