alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9.8 Classification challenges. ( a ) *Challenges.* Authorized holders of information pertaining to the Department of State who believe that its classification status is improper are expected and encouraged to challenge the classification status of the information. Such persons making challenges to the classification status of information shall not be subject to retribution for such action. Informal, usually oral, challenges are encouraged. Formal challenges to classification actions shall be in writing to an original classification authority (OCA) with jurisdiction over the information and a copy of the challenge shall be sent to the Office of Information Programs and Services (IPS) of the Department of State, SA-2, 515 22nd St. NW., Washington, DC 20522-8100. The Department (either the OCA or IPS) shall provide an initial response in writing within 60 calendar days.
( b ) *Appeal procedures and time limits.* A negative response may be appealed to the Department's Appeals Review Panel (ARP) and should be sent to: Chairman, Appeals Review Panel, c/o Director, Office of Information Programs and Services/Appeals Officer, at the IPS address given above. The appeal shall include a copy of the original challenge, the response, and any additional information the appellant believes would assist the ARP in reaching its decision. The ARP shall respond within 90 calendar days of receipt of the appeal. A negative decision by the ARP may be appealed to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) referenced in section 5.3 of Executive Order 13526. If the Department fails to respond to a formal challenge within 120 calendar days or if the ARP fails to respond to an appeal within 90 calendar days, the challenge may be sent directly to the ISCAP.
( c ) *Pre-publication review materials.* The provisions for classification challenges do not apply to material required to be submitted for pre-publication review, or other administrative action, pursuant to a non-disclosure agreement.
### §3605. Discrimination in residential real estate-related transactions

#### (a) In general

It shall be unlawful for any person or other entity whose business includes engaging in residential real estate-related transactions to discriminate against any person in making available such a transaction, or in the terms or conditions of such a transaction, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.

#### (b) "Residential real estate-related transaction" defined

As used in this section, the term "residential real estate-related transaction" means any of the following:

(1) The making or purchasing of loans or providing other financial assistance—

(A) for purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing, or maintaining a dwelling; or

(B) secured by residential real estate.

(2) The selling, brokering, or appraising of residential real property.

#### (c) Appraisal exemption

Nothing in this subchapter prohibits a person engaged in the business of furnishing appraisals of real property to take into consideration factors other than race, color, religion, national origin, sex, handicap, or familial status.

(Pub. L. 90–284, title VIII, §805, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93–383, title VIII, §808(b)(2), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 100–430, §6(c), Sept. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 1622.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–430 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "After December 31, 1968, it shall be unlawful for any bank, building and loan association, insurance company or other corporation, association, firm or enterprise whose business consists in whole or in part in the making of commercial real estate loans, to deny a loan or other financial assistance to a person applying therefor for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing, or maintaining a dwelling, or to discriminate against him in the fixing of the amount, interest rate, duration, or other terms or conditions of such loan or other financial assistance, because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such person or of any person associated with him in connection with such loan or other financial assistance or the purposes of such loan or other financial assistance, or of the present or prospective owners, lessees, tenants, or occupants of the dwelling or dwellings in relation to which such loan or other financial assistance is to be made or given: Provided, That nothing contained in this section shall impair the scope or effectiveness of the exception contained in section 3603(b) of this title."

1974—Pub. L. 93–383 inserted ", sex" after "religion".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–430 effective on 180th day beginning after Sept. 13, 1988, see section 13(a) of Pub. L. 100–430, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.
### §3796jj–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796jj–5 was editorially reclassified as section 10496 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2492 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2492

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Crotonic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Crotonic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROTONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2476 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2476

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
gain on the sale of certain residential leased-fee interests to holders 
                        of the leasehold rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

 Mr. Abercrombie introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
gain on the sale of certain residential leased-fee interests to holders 
                        of the leasehold rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALES OF CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL LEASED-
              FEE INTERESTS TO HOLDERS OF THE LEASEHOLD RIGHTS.

    (a) General Rule.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by inserting after section 139A the 
following new section:

``SEC. 139B. SALES OF CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL LEASED-FEE INTERESTS TO 
              HOLDERS OF THE LEASEHOLD RIGHTS.

    ``(a) General Rule.--In the case of a fee simple owner-lessor, and 
legal and equitable owners, of qualified property, gross income does 
not include gain from the sale of such property to a holder of the 
leasehold right if such holder is--
            ``(1) a lessee of a residential house lot,
            ``(2) a lessee of a multi-family residential leasehold 
        unit,
            ``(3) an association of apartment owners of a multi-family 
        residential leasehold property, or
            ``(4) a cooperative housing corporation for a residential 
        leasehold property.
    ``(b) Qualified Property.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term 
`qualified property' means the leased-fee interest to any residential 
house lot or the leased-fee interest in a condominium or co-operative 
housing apartment in a multi-family residential leasehold property.
    ``(c) Other Definitions.--For purposes of subsection (b)--
            ``(1) Fee simple owner, leased-fee interest, legal and 
        equitable owners, lessee.--The terms `fee simple owner', 
        `leased-fee interest', `legal and equitable owners', and 
        `lessee' shall have the same meaning as defined in Hawaii 
        Revised Statutes Sec.
```
### §300ff–132. Routine notifications with respect to airborne infectious diseases in victims assisted

#### (a) Routine notification of designated officer

#### (1) Determination by treating facility

If a victim of an emergency is transported by emergency response employees to a medical facility and the medical facility makes a determination that the victim has an airborne infectious disease, the medical facility shall notify the designated officer of the emergency response employees who transported the victim to the medical facility of the determination.

#### (2) Determination by facility ascertaining cause of death

If a victim of an emergency is transported by emergency response employees to a medical facility and the victim dies at or before reaching the medical facility, the medical facility ascertaining the cause of death shall notify the designated officer of the emergency response employees who transported the victim to the initial medical facility of any determination by the medical facility that the victim had an airborne infectious disease.

#### (b) Requirement of prompt notification

With respect to a determination described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a), the notification required in each of such paragraphs shall be made as soon as is practicable, but not later than 48 hours after the determination is made.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2695A, as added Pub. L. 111–87, §13, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2898.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as if enacted on Sept. 30, 2009, see section 2(a)(3)(B) of Pub. L. 111–87, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section note under section 300ff–11 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Paul M. Leonard, Petitioner, v James P. Melton, as Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent revoking petitioner’s operator’s license. Early in the morning of August 13, 1974 petitioner was arrested by a Saratoga County Deputy Sheriff for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. His driver’s license was subsequently revoked, after a hearing, for failure to submit to a chemical test pursuant to section 1194 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner maintains he was not driving a vehicle when arrested, a necessary prerequisite to a valid request to submit to a chemical test pursuant to section 1194 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner testified at the hearing that after consuming some beer he returned to his car, turned on the emergency blinker lights and fell asleep without starting the engine. The Deputy Sheriff drastically changed his initial version of what transpired but did testify that he found the petitioner slumped in the seat with his foot on the brake and detected an odor of alcohol. He further testified that the vehicle was partially on the highway with the lights on, that the motor was running and that the car was in gear. This conflicting testimony presented questions of fact and credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve. He implicitly accepted the testimony of the Deputy Sheriff, which on this record he had a right to do. This being so he could properly conclude that the Deputy Sheriff had a reasonable basis to conclude petitioner was operating the motor vehicle while intoxicated *(Matter of Prudhomme v Hults,*27 AD2d 234). It follows, therefore, that the Deputy Sheriff properly asked petitioner *to*take the chemical test. The record also substantiates the finding that petitioner refused. Since there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination we must affirm *(Matter of Williams v Tofany, 46*AD2d 708). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.
GEORGETOWN WATERFRONT, PARK PLAN

1 cate risen Rae Pam
2OIATE Somae MOLENOE WD SOOMATE BE PAN
2 ORATE ViNETY OF mLOEAD TEATINTS NENG Me ACES
4 came on Ace WacONON MORE ON. Pmt 17 RRS Romme
/ iS Seen nec Nein RS Oa BCA “3
Figoeee canon — 10 caare rOOmAD on wast BOE F ROOK cme

1 rove urn mame

20 renaputaTe ToEL00K
21 sry PoTmMAL oF WeTOME LUFT OAM

9 ESTAR MANTOUNCE Ane
22 movoe BKE ROUTE FROM PARK TO DE Une

Stamuze M0 ATOWRET HATORE ALKBLCT

* 23. Tuseren non wATownont be. Usoe

TEAR SR MU more west yeaa muse 24 Agu waruvnony ces at HOUSE si: WYO RLCING RANT 4

12reTa| WoAeeOv OAT COMER Ho BeEE wre 2 ee ene nts

| 1anecencn)peAmsows BOAT com rams 26 mesonve OMe TOWPAMH WEST OF SI87 INET

estan. wOAMOUE ANA CHO NoTOMEED 27 MOWOE BML MALE CONTACT APM rOUEE HCLTY

YG ACOURE RALAOAD MONT OF WAY ( GEORGETOWN SPUR) (28 LGHT TOWPATY BETWEEN 90% & 918T STREETS OMY \

18 BRECATE see hour Mhow nomee 10 soumene oF cua 20 mesons aruwrer snoeovoach.mesoncee \
PRPS a A ‘30 meso hataul scone Yauee GF husscne

FRONT PARK & C&O NHP (GEORGETOWN SECTOR)

PLAN FOR THE GEORGETC

\|

National Park Service

NATIONAL
me



DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES

Footprint Length

18,682 SF 280 feet 57’ at wings/ 50’-8” 37-6"
81'-5” at (22'-8” ) (9'-6")
center

14,997 SF | 255feet 45’ atwings/| 40-0" 31-6" 32-6"
81'-5" at (12') (3-6) (4-6")
center

18,682 SF 280 feet 57’ at wings/ 36'-6"
81'-5” at (8'-6")
center

woot National Park Service

-



ALTERNATIVE A - 18,682 SF FOOTPRINT; MAX. HT. = 51 FEET.

_____ 22-0" Combined Capital Crescent
= sist

Conon
838 Turn-around /
QF Area

Toe of Embankment

ivmat

B —~— A A 1000
oat Storage Area oa del

Boat Storage
Sr AraarTT

National Park Service

Rowing Tank ud

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

A
5

al

ge om
PREPAC mS be

WEST ELEVATION

b t

Locker

tf

ee

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

——— oo
° 20 40 Feet
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4901-N-49]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 3, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 24, 2004.

Mark R. Johnston,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 04-26382  Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
AFS-16-106475-E

December 30, 2016

 Exemption No. 10682B

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-1277

Mr. Christopher R. Meinhardt

Director of Maintenance

Air Methods Corporation

7301 South Peoria St.

Englewood, CO 80112

Dear Mr. Meinhardt:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10682, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 7, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Air Methods Corp. (Air Methods) for an extension of Exemption No. 10682, as 

amended. That exemption, from §§ 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) of Title 14 Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR), allows Air Methods to perform Air Traffic Control (ATC) transponder 

tests and inspections and altimeter system, and altimeter reporting equipment tests, and 

inspections for its part 135 aircraft maintained under an Approved Aircraft Inspection 

Program (AAIP). 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.
AFS-16-106475-E

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Air Methods.

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10682, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant Air Methods Corp. an exemption from 14 

CFR §§ 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) to perform ATC transponder tests and inspections and

altimeter system, and altimeter reporting equipment tests, and inspections for its part 135 

aircraft maintained under an AAIP. This exemption extension is subject to the following 

conditions and limitations below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All ATC transponder tests and inspections, and all altimeters reporting equipment 

tests and inspections, must be conducted under Air Methods Corp.’s part 135 

AAIP.

2. All tests and inspections must be recorded in the aircraft’s maintenance log by the 

person performing each inspection and test. This entry must identify the person, 

the date, and this exemption number.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10682, as amended, to December

30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 06-60683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

VERSUS
TONTE DEON WALKER Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport 1:05-CR-94-LG Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason,the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
### §2138. Suspension of licenses during war or national emergency

Whenever the Congress declares that a state of war or national emergency exists, the Commission is authorized to suspend any licenses granted under this chapter if in its judgment such action is necessary to the common defense and security. The Commission is authorized during such period, if the Commission finds it necessary to the common defense and security, to order the recapture of any special nuclear material or to order the operation of any facility licensed under section 2133 or 2134 of this title, and is authorized to order the entry into any plant or facility in order to recapture such material, or to operate such facility. Just compensation shall be paid for any damages caused by the recapture of any special nuclear material or by the operation of any such facility.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §108, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 939; amended Pub. L. 86–373, §2, Sept. 23, 1959, 73 Stat. 691; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1959—Pub. L. 86–373 struck out "distributed under the provisions of section 2073(a) of this title," before "or to order".
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2546 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Red 185. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment 

Red 185. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 185. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pigment Red 185) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2546 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ