cEO SI4?

• UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

OCT 112012

Mr. Richard W. Corey

Deputy Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

Post Office Box 2815

Sacramento, California 95812

Dear Mr. Corey:

On September 21, 2012, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan. We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that

they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51, Appendix V.

APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title

Antelope Valley 107 Certification of Submissions and

Emission Statements

Antelope Valley 1 151 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment

Coating Operations

Butte County 300 Open Burning, Prohibitions and

Exemptions

Feather River 10.1 New Source Review

Placer County Reg. III Open Burning

Placer County 233 Biomass Boilers

Sacramento Metropolitan 417 Wood Burniflg Appliances

Sacramento Metropolitan 421 Mandatory Episodic Curtailment of

Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning

San Diego County 67.1 1 Wood Products Coating Operations

Santa Barbara County 102 Definitions

Santa Barbara County 202 Exemptions to Rule 201

Santa Barbara County 321 Solvent Cleaning Machines and Solvent

Cleaning

Santa Barbara County 330 Surface Coating of Metal Parts and

Products

Santa Barbara County 337 Surface Coating of Aerospace Vehicles

and Components

Santa Barbara County 349 Polyester Resin Operations

Santa Barbara County 353 Adhesives and Sealants

South Coast 461 Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing

Yolo-Solano 3.24 Prevention of Significant Deterioration

Pri,,ted on Recycled Paper
This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete

revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k).

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (415) 947-4120.

Sincerely,

omr

Dire • Air Division

cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston, EQ

Antelope Valley AQMD

Mr. W. James Wagoner, APCO

Butte County AQMD

Mr. Dave Valler, APCO

Feather River AQMD

Mr. Tom Christofk, APCO

Placer County APCD

Mr. Larry Greene, APCOIEO

Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD

Mr. Robert Kard, APCO

San Diego County APCD

Mr. Dave Van Mullem, Director/APCO

Santa Barbara County APCD

Dr. Barry Wallerstein, EO

South Coast AQMD

Mr. Mat Ehrhardt, APCO

Yolo-Solano AQMD

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Stationary Source Division
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

= Complete

_________________________

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Antelope Valley AQMD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

107 1151

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X

(b) Evidence of adoption X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X

(h) Public comments & agency response X X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Butte County AQMD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

= Complete

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

300

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan x

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out x

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice x

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS cI

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Complete

Incomplete

Not Applicable To Rule

Material Missing

10.1

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X

(dl) Copyof actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS I c

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Feather River AQMD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C =

NIA =

0 =

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

= Complete

________________________

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Placer County APCD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

Reg. III 301 302 303 304

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee x x x x

(b) Evidence of adoption X X X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X X X

(dl)Copyof actual rule/plan X X X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X X X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X X X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A N/A N/A N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified x x x x

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified x x x x

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A N/A N/A N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X X X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X X X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C C

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

= Complete

_________________________

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Placer County APCD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

305 306 233

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X X

(b) Evidence of adoption X X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A N/A N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A N/A N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A

I OVERALL COMPLETENESS I I c I

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD

Date Reviewed October 3, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

= Complete

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

417 421

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X

(b) Evidence of adoption x x

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X

(dl) Copyof actual rule/plan X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X

(h) Public comments & agency response X X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact x X

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

( OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C

1

Notes:
= Complete

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name San Diego County APCD

Date Reviewed October 4, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

67.11

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X

(h) Public comments & agency response X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact X

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Key:

C

N/A

0

= Complete

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

337 349 353

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X X

(b) Evidence of adoption x x x

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X X

(dl) Copyof actual rule/plan X X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X X

(f) Copy of public notice x x x

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A N/A N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact x x x

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements x x x

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C

Submittal Date September 21. 2012

District Name Santa Barbara County APCD

Date Reviewed October 4, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

= Complete

_________________________

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Santa Barbara County APCD

Date Reviewed October 4, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

102 202 321 330

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendixV, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X X X

(b) Evidence of adoption X X X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X X X X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X X X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X X X X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X X X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A N/A N/A N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X X X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact X X X X

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration X N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A X X X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A X X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C I

Notes:
EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

= Complete

_________________________

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name South Coast AQMD

Date Reviewed October 4, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

[ 4611

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice x

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice x

(h) Public comments & agency response X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact X

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements x

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS I

Notes:
= Complete

= Incomplete

= Not Applicable To Rule

= Material Missing

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date September 21, 2012

District Name Yolo-Solano AQMD

Date Reviewed October 4, 2012

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C

NIA

0

3.24

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X

(Li) Public comments & agency response N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified N/A

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

I OVERALL COMPLETENESS C

Notes: