alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 50.51 Review of finding of loss of nationality. ( a ) There are no prescribed “procedures for administrative appeal” of issuance of a Certificate of Loss of Nationality for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501) and no mandatory administrative review procedure prior to resort to judicial processes under § 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1503). Nevertheless, the Department may in its discretion review determinations of loss of nationality at any time after approval of issuance of the Certificate of Loss of Nationality to ensure consistency with governing law (see INA §§ 349 and 356, 8 U.S.C. 1481 and 1488). Such reconsideration may be initiated at the request of the person concerned or another person determined in accordance with guidance issued by the Department to have a legitimate interest.
( b ) The primary grounds on which the Department will consider reversing a finding of loss of nationality and vacating a Certificate of Loss of Nationality are: ( 1 ) The law under which the finding of loss was made has been held unconstitutional; or
( 2 ) A major change in the interpretation of the law of expatriation is made as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision; or
( 3 ) A major change in the interpretation of the law of expatriation is made by the Department, or is made by a court or another agency and adopted by the Department; and/or
( 4 ) The person presents substantial new evidence, not previously considered, of involuntariness or absence of intent at the time of the expatriating act.
( c ) When the Department reverses a finding of loss of nationality, the person concerned shall be considered not to have lost U.S. nationality as of the time the expatriating act was committed, and the Certificate of Loss of Nationality shall be vacated.
( d ) Requesting the Department to reverse a finding of loss of nationality and vacate a Certificate of Loss of Nationality is not a prescribed “procedure for administrative appeal” for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501). The Department's decision in response to such a request is not a prescribed “procedure for administrative appeal” for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501). The issuance of a Certificate of Loss of Nationality by the Department is a “final administrative determination” and “final administrative denial” for purposes of §§ 358 and 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501 and 1503), respectively.
[73 FR 41258, July 18, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4416

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FILAMENT TOW.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Acrylic filament    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          tow                                                               12/31/2015
                          (polyacrylonitril
                          e tow) containing
                          by weight 92
                          percent or more
                          of
                          polyacrylonitrile
                          , not more than
                          0.01 percent of
                          zinc, and 2
                          percent or more
                          but not over 8
                          percent of water,
                          importing in the
                          form of bundles
                          of crimped
                          product 250,000
                          filaments (plus
                          or minus 10
                          percent) with an
                          average decitex
                          of 3.3 to 5.6
                          decitex (plus or
                          minus 10 percent)
                          and length
                          greater than 2
                          meters (provided
                          for in subheading
                          5501.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §4846. State laws superseded, and null and void

It is hereby expressly declared that it is the intent of the Congress to supersede any and all laws of the States and units of local government insofar as they may now or hereafter provide for a requirement, prohibition, or standard relating to the lead content in paints or other similar surface-coating materials which differs from the provisions of this chapter or regulations issued pursuant to this chapter. Any law, regulation, or ordinance purporting to establish such different requirement, prohibition, or standard shall be null and void.

(Pub. L. 91–695, title V, §504, formerly §506, as added Pub. L. 93–151, §7(e), Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 568; renumbered §504, Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 504 of Pub. L. 91–695 was classified to section 4844 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–626.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 13301          Edition: 21          Edition Date: August 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 10/8/2011     LNM - 9/27/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
### §300jj–37. General grant and loan provisions

#### (a) Reports

The Secretary may require that an entity receiving assistance under this part shall submit to the Secretary, not later than the date that is 1 year after the date of receipt of such assistance, a report that includes—

(1) an analysis of the effectiveness of the activities for which the entity receives such assistance, as compared to the goals for such activities; and

(2) an analysis of the impact of the project on health care quality and safety.

#### (b) Requirement to improve quality of care and decrease in costs

The National Coordinator shall annually evaluate the activities conducted under this part and shall, in awarding grants, implement the lessons learned from such evaluation in a manner so that awards made subsequent to each such evaluation are made in a manner that, in the determination of the National Coordinator, will result in the greatest improvement in the quality and efficiency of health care.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXX, §3017, as added Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title XIII, §13301, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 257.)
Appeal Dismissed and Me morandum Opinion filed August 25 , 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00305

- CR

ROBERT RICHARD LOPEZ , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1504752

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Robert Richard Lopez was indicted for aggravated assault of a family member. Pursuant to a charge

- bargain agreement with the State, a ppellant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of deadly conduct

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.05(b)(2). T he trial court entered an order of deferred adjudication
, placing appellant on community supervision for two years. Although a defendant usuall y has no right of appeal in a charge

- bargain case, t he trial court gave appellant2

permission to appeal the issue of whether the indictment should be set aside. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 11, 2016

. On August 9, 2016 , this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant’s counsel had not filed a brief in this appeal. The trial court conducted the hearing on August 15, 2016. At the hearing, appellant stated he no longer wished to pursue his appeal.
Appellant has not filed a written motion to withdraw the appeal or a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon the testimony at the hearing that appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operatio n of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 2.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Ralph James M. Bullowa and Another, Respondents, v. Amerigus Realty Corporation and Another, Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of *Bullowa*v. *Amerigus Realty Corporation*(191 App. Div. 905). Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4428 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4428

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of 
    methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-
     triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain mixtures of 
    methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-
     triazin-2-yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF METHYL 2-[[[[[4-(DIMETHYLAMINO)-6-
              (2,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHOXY)-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-
              YL]AMINO]CARBONYL]AMINO]-SULFONYL]-3-METHYLBENZOATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Mixtures of methyl 2-[[[[[4-
(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-
yl]amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Sydney F. Cohen et al., Copartners Doing Business as Precision Steel Rule Die Co., Petitioner, v. Lawrence E. Gerosa, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
#### § 219.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
Exhibit
10.29


 


ASSIGNMENT
OF CONTRACT


 


This
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT (the “Assignment”) is
made and entered into this     day of January, 2006 by
INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., an Illinois corporation (“Assignor”) and MB SUGAR LAND GILLINGHAM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
an Illinois limited partnership (“Assignee”).


 


Assignor
does hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over and convey unto Assignee all of
its right, title and interest as Purchaser under that certain Contract of Sale
and Purchase dated as of August 12, 2005, as amended, and entered into by
1410 Gillingham, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, as Seller and Assignor, as
Purchaser (collectively, the “Agreement”),
respect to the sale and purchase of the property described by the Agreement,
located in Sugar Land, Texas.


 


Assignor
represents and warrants that it is the Purchaser under the Agreement, and that
it has not sold, assigned, transferred, or encumbered such interest in any way
to any other person or entity. By acceptance hereof, Assignee accepts the
foregoing Assignment and agrees, from and after the date hereof, to (i) perform
all of the obligations of Purchaser under the Agreement, and (ii) indemnify,
defend, protect and hold Assignor harmless from and against all claims and
liabilities arising under the Agreement.


 


 


	
   

  	
  ASSIGNOR:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  INLAND
  REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., an  
Illinois corporation, 

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/
  Karen Kautz

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
    Karen
  Kautz

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
    Vice-President

  



 


 


	
   

  	
  ASSIGNEE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  MB
  SUGAR LAND GILLINGHAM LIMITED

  PARTNERSHIP, an
  Illinois limited partnership

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  MB
  Sugar Land Gillingham GP, L.L.C., a Delaware

  limited liability company, its general partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  Minto
  Builders (Florida), Inc., a Florida 

  corporation, its sole member

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/ Derra
  A. Palmer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
    Derra A.
  Palmer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
    Assistant
  Secretary
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

P."Z."G.R., 

DA 21-0543 

A Youth in Need of Care. 

JAN 0 4 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

This matter comes before the Court on the petition of Appellate Defender 

Chad Wright for leave to file an out-of-time appeal on the Father's behalf, pursuant to 

M. R. App. P. 4(6). The petition includes an Affidavit of trial counsel Michael Strand with 

explanation that due to his illness, absence from the office, and miscommunication with 

Father, he did not timely perfect Father's appeal. 

The order terminating Father's parental rights was issued by the Thirteenth Judicial 

District Court, Yellowstone County, on October 4, 2021, in Cause No. DN 17-156. To 

guarantee that Father's right to appeal is protected, the Appellate Defender requests an 

order permitting an out-of-time appeal from that Order. If Father is not permitted to appeal, 

it would constitute a gross miscarriage of justice and unduly punish him. The petition 

further states the Attorney General has no objection. 

Given the importance of the interests at stake for the Father, and without objection, 

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for leave to file an out-of-time appeal is 

GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellate Defender shall have ten days from 

the date of this Order within which to file a Notice of Appeal. The Appellate Defender 

shall immediately order the appropriate transcripts, if they have not been already ordered. 

01/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0543
record. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of 

DATED this —1 day of January, 2022. 

2 

Justices
§ 306.8 Pre-complaint procedure. ( a ) Any applicant, trainee or volunteer who believes that he or she has been subject to prohibited discrimination must bring such allegations to the attention of OCRD within 60 days of the alleged discrimination, at which point a Counselor will be assigned to attempt to resolve them.
( b ) The pre-complaint procedure is intended to determine whether the concerns of the aggrieved party can be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the aggrieved party and the agency without the filing of a formal complaint.
( c ) The counselor serves as a neutral party, to gather a limited amount of information from the aggrieved party about his or her allegations, explain to the aggrieved party his or her rights, obtain information to determine the applicability of this regulation, and where appropriate, attempt an informal resolution among relevant parties.
( d ) The amount of information that the counselor gathers from the agency is limited to information needed to reach an informal resolution to the mutual satisfaction of the aggrieved party and the agency.
( e ) The counselor will keep a written record of his or her activities, which will be submitted to the OCRD Director as a counselor's report.
( f ) To the extent necessary to reach an informal resolution, the counselor may reveal to relevant agency officials the identity of the aggrieved party. In the event that the aggrieved party requests that the Counselor not share his or her identity with agency officials, the Counselor will not reveal the identity of the aggrieved party (or information that could be used to easily identify the aggrieved party) outside of OCRD. If appropriate, the Counselor should explain to the aggrieved party that an informal resolution and/or the scope of relief available may be limited as a result of the request for anonymity.
( g ) The pre-complaint process should be completed within 30 days, but the OCRD Director may extend the period upon request of the aggrieved party or the agency for good cause shown.
( h ) If, after inquiry and counseling, an informal resolution to the allegation is not reached, the Counselor will notify the aggrieved party in writing of the right to file a formal complaint of discrimination with the OCRD Director within 30 calendar days of the aggrieved party's receipt of the notice.
( i ) As an alternative to assignment of a Counselor as described above, the aggrieved party may ask for Alternative Dispute Resolution as set out in the Peace Corps' policy. In such a case, the parties have 90 days to attempt in good faith to reach an informal resolution of the allegation. At any time during the course of Alternative Dispute Resolution, the aggrieved party or the Responsible Management Official (or their Supervisor), in consultation with the Office of the General Counsel, may terminate those proceedings.
###### Editorial Note on Part 217

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 217.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity within the United States receiving Federal financial assistance.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00507-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

County Court at Law No. 3 of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-001747-3

Before Walker, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE AURORA RICO FLORES, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 22, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,942,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,688,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,796,811
<PP&E>                                       5,552,076
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,392,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,741,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,399,346
<BONDS>                                     80,716,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,071
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,812,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,741,520
<SALES>                                     14,777,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,528,637
<CGS>                                       14,062,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,618,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,774,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,454,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,381,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,381,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                               2,397,325
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
### §3755. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3755 was editorially reclassified as section 10156 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.