alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4394. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–515, title V, §501(d), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1310, which required the President, within one year of his transmittal to Congress of the report required by section 4393 of this title, and annually thereafter, to supplement that report with such new data, evaluations, or recommendations as he may deem appropriate, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, item 6 on page 20 of House Document No. 103–7.
#### Reta A. Gross, Respondent, v Jack H. Kellerman, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order insofar as it reinstates order dated February 10, 1977, unanimously reversed and in all other respects order affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in *Gross v Kellerman*(62 AD2d 1149). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—support, attorney’s fees.) Present —Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
### §2705. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–644, §16(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2330

Section, Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §115, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 833, provided for withholding of Federal taxes by antipoverty agencies.
### §4801. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588

Section, Pub. L. 91–695, title I, §101, Jan. 13, 1971, 84 Stat. 2078; Pub. L. 93–151, §1, Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 565; Pub. L. 94–317, title II, 204(a), June 23, 1976, 90 Stat. 705, related to the development of local programs with respect to detection and treatment of lead-based paint poisoning.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588, provided that the repeal of this section is effective Oct. 1, 1979.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 91–695, §1, Jan. 13, 1971, 84 Stat. 2078, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act'."
#### Edge *et al. v.*Garrett, chairman, *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

A controversy arising as to the location of the site for a school building, in a school district in which an election has been held and the result thereof declared in favor of local taxation for public school's, must be determined -by the county board of education, with a right of appeal to the State school commissioner and the State board of education; and a court of equity will not entertain jurisdiction of the subject, but will remand the parties to their legal remedy. *Meadows*v. *Board of Education,*136 *Ga.*153 (1) (71 S. E. 146); *Jarrell*v. *Davis,*137 *Ga. 55*(72 S. E. 417).

*(a)*Accordingly, where a county board of education had selected a site for a public-school building in such a district at a place which, in the judgment of the board, was the most advantageous place for the location of the site and as near as practicable to the center of the district, and where the board subsequently, upon the advice of the State school commissioner that the board had the power so to do, agreed, upon the application of certain citizens and taxpayers of the district, to reopen 'the matter as to the location of the site, but took no action revoking the selection of the site previously made, and appointed a time when all persons interested might appear before the board and be heard upon the subject; and where by reason of the illness of the president of the board such meeting was *not*held, and the board thereafter refused to grant a hearing as to the relocation of the site, and the trustees of the district were proceeding to have a school building erected upon the site designated by the board: *Held,*that under such facts the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining the county board of education, the trustees of *94the school district, and the' county school commissioner from erecting, with funds raised by taxation in the district for such purpose, a public-school building upon the site selected by the board.

April 11, 1912.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Edwards. Douglas superior court. July 21, 1911.

*J. 8. James,*for plaintiffs. *W. T. Roberts,*for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §5651. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5651 was editorially reclassified as section 11141 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5651, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §241, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1125; Pub. L. 95–115, §§3(a)(3)(A), (5), 5(a), (f), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1048, 1049, 1056, 1057; Pub. L. 96–509, §19(j), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2765; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §631, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2118; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7259, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4441; Pub. L. 102–586, §2(g)(1), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 4994, related to the National Institute for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12210(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1880.
### §3789e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3789e was editorially reclassified as section 10229 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Exhibit 10.1

                               PLANGRAPHICS, INC.
                              112 EAST MAIN STREET
                               FRANKFORT, KY 40601



December 21, 2005


Name of Executive
Title
Street
City, State, Zip Code


Dear (Name of Executive):

Pursuant to your employment letter effective January 1, 2002, this letter is
intended to inform you of PlanGraphics' interest and intent to extend the
aforementioned agreement through September 30, 2006, pursuant to the existing
terms and conditions of the contract.

If the extension is acceptable to you under those terms, please acknowledge with
your signature below and return two signed copies to me.

If you would prefer to discuss the extension or modification to the agreement,
please inform Kimberly Wallace who will schedule the discussion at the earliest
possible opportunity.

Sincerely,

/S/ John C. Antenucci

John C. Antenucci
President and CEO


CC:  Gary S. Murray
     Joyce Rector


Signature:                                              Date:
          --------------------------------------------       ------------------
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Manufacturers Trust Company, Respondent, as Trustee of a Trust Created for the Benefit of Ella V. Whittemore, under the Will of Fielding L. Whittemore, Deceased. Anna P. Dickinson et al., Appellants; William F. White, as Executor of Ella V. Whittemore, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Decree settling final accounts, so far as appealed from unanimously modified on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the allowance of compensation for legal services to Adams & James, Esqs., attorneys for Virginia H. Twineh, from $2,500 to $1,000, and as so modified the decree is affirmed, with costs to the respondent executor payable out of the trust estate. Counsel fees for services rendered in unsuccessfully asserting the claim of this beneficiary, in the absence of proof that the difference was merited, should not exceed the fees awarded to the executor’s attorneys, whose services were more directly beneficial to the trust estate and the decedent’s estate. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [25 Misc 2d 309.]
### §3797ff–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797ff–2 was editorially reclassified as section 10703 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2453 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2453

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur HL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur HL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESMODUR HL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      aromatic            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         polyisocyanate                                                     31/2009
                         based on toluene
                         diisocyanate
                         (TDI) and
                         hexamethylene
                         diisocyanate
                         (HDI) dissolved
                         in n-butyl
                         acetate (CAS No.
                         63368-95-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3911.90.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOMA F. KAMLER

, *

* No. 11

- 617V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: April 11, 2013

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; stipulation of

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * fact; award in the amount to which

* respondent has not objected

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

Donald L. Schlapprizzi , St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner;

Michael P. Milmoe , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Respondent filed a stipulation of fact concerning final attorneys’ fees and costs in the

above

- captioned matter on April 10, 2013 . Previously, on March 15, 2013, Ms. Kamler filed a

motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent filed a response to petitioner’s mo tion on April

1, 2013, wherein respondent raised objections to certain items. Based on subsequent informal

discussions, petitioner amended her application to request a total of $ 34,500 .00 in fees and costs

, an amount to which respondent does not object

. The Court awards this amount

.

Ms. Kamler filed for compensation on September 26, 2011, alleging that the Tetanus

Diphtheria

- acellular Pertussis vaccine

, which she received on or about September 19, 2009,

caused her to suffer Guillain

- Barré Syndrome

. Ms. Kamler received compensation based upon

the parties’ stipulation. Decision , filed Jan. 22, 2013 . Because Ms. Kamler received

compensation, she is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

Ms. Kamler seeks a total of $ 34,500 .00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for her counsel. I n

compliance with General Order No. 9, Ms. Kamler filed a statement that she incurred no out

- of

-

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. Respondent has no objection to th e amount

requested for attorneys’ fees and costs.

After reviewing the request, the court awards a check made payable to petitioner and

petitioner’s attorney in the amount of $ 34,500 .00 for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs.

The court thanks the partie s for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each pa rty filing

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 2-10-283-CV

2-10-285-CV

2-10-287-CV

TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE APPELLANT

THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED 

THIRTY-SIX DOLLARS AND 

SEVEN/100

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss@ of appellants LeRoy

Blanks, Anita Blanks, Carpenter Land Investment Company, Fort Worth Bingo, 

Inc., and Fort Worth Concessions. It is the court=s opinion that the motion should 

be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 

43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Costs of the appeals shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: September 2, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)

January 19, 2006

Ms/Mr. XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
City, State, Zip


Dear XXXX:

In the Change of Control Agreement entered into between you and EDO Corporation
in 2003, it states that the Agreement would expire as of December 31, 2003. It
goes on to state however, that the Agreement my be renewed each year by mutual
consent of the Company and the Executive by the issuance of a letter of
notification and agreement to that effect. Such a letter extension was issued
each subsequent year, including 2005.

This letter is to advise that the Company does hereby again extend the
cancellation date to December 31, 2006. (see page 2, General, item 2 and 3). All
other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in place as presented in the
above referenced document.

Please sign both copies of this letter as an indication of your acceptance of
this extension of the time period the Agreement is in effect. Please return one
copy to me by XXXXX, 2005 and keep the other copy for your records.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.


                                      S/
                                         ------------------------------
                                              James M. Smith for
                                              EDO Corporation

                                      S/
                                         ------------------------------
                                              Name ("Executive")

date:
### §5701. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5701 was editorially reclassified as section 11201 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Report on Promising Strategies to End Youth Homelessness

Pub. L. 108–96, title I, §118, Oct. 10, 2003, 117 Stat. 1170, provided that, not later than 2 years after Oct. 10, 2003, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, was to submit to the Congress a report on promising strategies to end youth homelessness.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27616]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL WOMEN'S BUSINESS COUNCIL


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    In accordance with the Women's Business Ownership Act, Public Law 
106-554 as amended, the National Women's Business Council (NWBC) would 
like to announce a forthcoming Council meeting. The meeting will 
introduce the National Women's Business Council's agenda and action 
items for fiscal year 2005, included and not limited to procurement, 
access to capital, access to training and technical assistance, access 
to markets and affordable health care.

Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2005.

Address: The Small Business Administration, Eisenhower Conference Room, 
409 3rd Street, SW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC.

Time: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Status: Open to the public. Attendance by RSVP only.

Contact: National Women's Business Council, (202) 205-3850--Katherine 
Stanley.
    Anyone wishing to attend or would like to make an oral presentation 
at the meeting must contact Katherine Stanley, at (202) 205-6695, no 
later than Monday, January 10, 2005.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27616 Filed 12-14-04; 10:23 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.75 Termination or modification.

If USAID directs that the delivery of commodities be terminated, orders that title to commodities be vested in it, or modifies any implementing document concerning the disposition of documents, USAID shall give written notice thereof to the banks holding applicable letters of commitment and shall instruct each bank with regard to the disposition of documents. Each such bank shall be relieved of any liability whatsoever to the approved applicant for anything done or omitted to be done under instruction of USAID. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a bank shall comply with the instructions of USAID only to the extent that it may do so without impairing or affecting any irrevocable obligation to any person or organization except an approved applicant, and in the event the bank shall incur any costs, expenses, or liabilities, including any liability to the approved applicant, it shall be repaid and reimbursed by USAID in respect thereof.
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999.

#### § 61.9 General information.

General information and application forms may be obtained by writing to the Attestation Office as follows: ECA/GCV—Attestation Officer, Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547; or calling (202) 475-0221.

[59 FR 18965, Apr. 21, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2619

To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel who qualify 

for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form 

of coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2005

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel 

who qualify for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form of coverage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Equity 

5 Act’’. 
2

•HR 2619 IH 

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF COPAYMENTS AND DEDUCTIBLES FOR 

2 CERTAIN MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERV3 ICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any member or former member 

5 of a uniformed service, or dependent of such a member, 

6 who is eligible for health benefits under the TRICARE 

7 program under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, 

8 and who has another insurance plan or program that pro9 vides primary coverage for health benefits shall not be re10 quired to pay any copayment or annual deductible under 

11 the TRICARE program. 

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

13 prescribe regulations to carry out subsection (a). 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply 

15 with respect to health benefits provided after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 1510.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subject to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
§ 513.220 Continuation of covered transactions. ( a ) Notwithstanding the debarment, suspension, proposed debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, determination of ineligibility, or voluntary exclusion of any person by an agency, agencies and participants may continue covered transactions in existence at the time the person was debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded. A decision as to the type of termination action, if any, to be taken should be made only after thorough review to ensure the propriety of the proposed action.
( b ) Agencies and participants shall not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any person who is debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, ineligible or voluntary excluded, except as provided in § 513.215.
[60 FR 33041, 33045, June 26, 1995]
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2270** 

EUGENE SHERLOCK HOLMES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROY COOPER, as Administrator of the Estate of Attorney General for the State of North Carolina; ALL MEDIA T.V. STATIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv
- 00570

- FDW

- DSC )

Submitted : March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015

Before GREGORY , DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eugene Sherlock Holmes appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous

and for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief

. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does not challenge in his

informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition,

he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Carmine Esposito v. American Railway Express Company.

Application granted. Order signed. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.