alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Carmine Stella, certify that:
 
 1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage Corporation.;
 
 2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:
 
 a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.              I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:
 
 a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6.              I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
 material weaknesses.
  Date:  August 20, 2010
By:
/s/ Carmine N. StellaCarmine N. StellaPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2479 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.87.12 Unicycles (provided for in 

subheading 8712.00.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2479 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Village of Suffern, Respondent, v. Realty Funds Corporation, Appellant.

In a proceeding by the Village of Suffern, pursuant to statute (Village Law, § 89, subd. 7-a) and pursuant to the corresponding Unsafe Building Ordinance adopted by said village on March 10, 1958, against the owner of a building, to determine that the building is a public nuisance and to direct that it be demolished, the owner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, rendered June 2, 1960 (such order being designated in the notice of appeal as a judgment-decree), after a nonjury trial, which granted the petition and: (a) directed the removal of the building within a prescribed period of time at the owner’s expense; (b) authorized petitioner, in the event the owner shall fail to remove said building within such prescribed period, to proceed with its demolition and removal; and (c) directed that, in the event the petitioner demolishes and removes the building, then the cost thereof shall be assessed against the land upon which the building is located. Order reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. The statute and the local ordinance under which the proceeding was brought empower the Board of Trustees of the village to provide for the removal or repair of buildings which are dangerous or unsafe to the public. In our opinion, there was substantial compliance with the provisions of said statute and ordinance. In view of the agreement among the witnesses who testified, however, that the building could be repaired so as to be made safe to the public, it is our opinion that it was error to direct its demolition without giving the owner an opportunity to make it safe by effecting the necessary repairs. Upon the remission, the court, on the basis of the evidence heretofore submitted or on the basis of that evidence and su’ch additional competent and relevant *770evidence as the parties may he advised to submit, should determine what repairs are necessary to make the building safe and should give such directions as may be proper, with respect to the repair and security of the building, and with respect to its removal if it shall not be repaired and made secure, as the court may direct. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsContact stresses in pin-loaded orthotropic platesThe effects of pin elasticity, friction, and clearance on the stresses near the hole in a pin-loaded orthotropic plate are described. The problem is modeled as a contact elasticity problem using complex variable theory, the pin and the plate being two elastic bodies interacting through contact. This modeling is in contrast to previous works which assumed that the pin is rigid or that it exerts a known cosinusoidal radial traction on the hole boundary. Neither of these approaches explicitly involves a pin. A collocation procedure and iteration were used to obtain numerical results for a variety of plate and pin elastic properties and various levels of friction and clearance. Collocation was used to enforce the boundary and iteration was used to find the contact and no-slip regions on the boundary. Details of the numerical scheme are discussed.Document ID19840013832Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHyer, M. W.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Klang, E. C.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1984Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:173475NASA-CR-173475CCMS-84-02VPI-E-84-14Accession Number84N21900Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013832.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING HEARING

RE DEFENDANT’S

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

A further meet-and-confer is SET for THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 2010, FROM

8:00–10:00 A.M., in connection with defendant’s discovery dispute outlined in counsel’s

letter of January 4. This will take place in the Court’s jury room on the 19th floor. At 10:00 a.m.,

the Court will hold a hearing in Courtroom 9. Plaintiff’s response is due by noon on January 6. 

Counsel are reminded that only those who participate in the further meet-and-confer may

argue at the hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02058-WHA Document 45 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2537

To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments and dyes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on certain organic pigments 

and dyes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND DYES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain organic pigments and dyes) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2537 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §5052. Suspension and termination of financial assistance; procedures; notice and hearing; emergency situations; refunding applications

(a) The Director is authorized, in accordance with the provisions of this section, to suspend further payments or to terminate payments under any contract or grant providing assistance under this chapter, whenever the Director determines there is a material failure to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of any such grant or contract. The Director shall prescribe procedures to insure that—

(1) assistance under this chapter shall not be suspended for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions, except in emergency situations for thirty days;

(2) an application for refunding under this chapter may not be denied unless the recipient has been given (A) notice at least 75 days before the denial of such application of the possibility of such denial and the grounds for any such denial, and (B) opportunity to show cause why such action should not be taken;

(3) in any case where an application for refunding is denied for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant or contract award, the recipient shall be afforded an opportunity for an informal hearing before an impartial hearing officer, who has been agreed to by the recipient and the Agency; and

(4) assistance under this chapter shall not be terminated for failure to comply with applicable terms and conditions unless the recipient has been afforded reasonable notice and opportunity for a full and fair hearing.

(b) In order to assure equal access to all recipients, such hearings or other meetings as may be necessary to fulfill the requirements of this section shall be held at locations convenient to the recipient agency.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title IV, §412, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 411; Pub. L. 98–288, §22, May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 99–551, §10(i)(8), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3078.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 394, known as the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4950 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–551 substituted "the Director" for "he" before "determines" in first sentence.

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–288 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted a semicolon for "nor shall an application for refunding under this chapter be denied, unless the recipient has been given reasonable notice and opportunity to show why such action should not be taken; and" in par. (1), added pars. (2) and (3), redesignated former par. (2) as (4), and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–551 effective Oct. 1, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see section 11 of Pub. L. 99–551, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4950 of this title.
#### § 191.10 Eligibility for benefits.

A person designated as a hostage under subpart A of this subchapter, other than a member of the Armed Forces covered by the provisions of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940, shall be eligible for benefits under this part.
#### § 313.8 No judicial review or enforceable rights.

This part is intended to improve the internal management of the Peace Corps. As such, it is for the use of Agency personnel only and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its agencies or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Office of Inspector General 

Improved Administration Can Enhance 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

Classified Laptop Computer Security 

Unclassified Summary 

OIG-08-14 November 2007
Improved Administration Can Enhance 

Federal Emergency Management Agency Classified Laptop Computer Security 

Unclassified Summary 

OIG-08-14

We audited the Department of Homeland Security and its organizational components’ security 

programs to evaluate the security and integrity of select government-issued laptop computers. The 

report assesses the strengths and weaknesses of security controls over the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) classified laptop computers. Our objective was to determine whether 

FEMA had established and implemented adequate and effective security policies and procedures 

related to the physical security of and logical access to its classified government-issued laptop 

computers. To secure FEMA data stored on classified government-issued laptop computers, we 

made six recommendations to the Administrator for FEMA. 

Office of Inspector General 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20528 
Additional Information and Copies 

To obtain additional copies of this report, call the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG) at (202) 254-4199, fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web 

site at www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG Hotline 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of 

criminal or noncriminal misconduct relative to department programs or 

operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, Attention: 

Office of Investigations - Hotline, 245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
Exhibit
(10) B


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


ECOLAB MIRROR PENSION PLAN


(As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2005)


 


WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”) has established and
currently maintains the Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan (As Amended and Restated effective
as of January 1, 2005) (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to change
the benefit formula to provide an offset for the actual qualified Pension Plan
benefit rather than the Pension Plan benefit determined by deeming an Executive’s
Annual Compensation to be equal to the annual compensation limit under Code
section 401(a)(17).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Plan and
Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified
Benefit Plans, the Company hereby amends the Plan as set forth below.


 


Words
used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used
herein as so defined.


 


(1)                                  Section
3.1(2) of the Plan is hereby amended by amending and restating paragraph (b) of
such Section to read as follows:


 


                                                (b)                                 =                                         the amount of the monthly benefit which would be payable to the Executive
under the Pension Plan calculated on a single life annuity basis commencing at
age 65, determined under the Pension Plan as in effect on the date of the
Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group.


 


(2)                                  Section
3.1(3) of the Plan is hereby amended by amending and restating paragraph (b) of
such Section to read as follows:


 


                                                (b)                                 =                                         the amount
which is actually credited to the Executive’s Retirement Account under the
Pension Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ecolab, Inc. has executed this Amendment No. 1 this 16 day of July,
2010.


 


	
  (Seal)

  	
   

  	
  ECOLAB
  INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/Steven
  L. Fritze 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Steven
  L. Fritze 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer

  
	
  Attest:

  	
  /s/James
  J. Seifert 

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  James
  J. Seifert 

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  General
  Counsel and Secretary
SERVED: AUGUST 22, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GRANDE AVIATION, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0545 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

:_;_, 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013CE190010) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

( -;JJ:_) 

\__ __ ~lillie A. Yoder 

Attachment - Service List 

Chief Administrative La~ 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

,800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

KentS. Jackson, Respondent's Counsel 

21628 Midland Dr. 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

TEL: 913-338-1700 

FAX: 913-338-1755 

ONE COPY 

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Central Region ACE-7 

DOT Building, Room 506 

901 Locust St. 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3766 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant· 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0545 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
### §3546. Use of domestic products

#### (a) Prohibition against fraudulent use of "Made in America" labels

A person shall not intentionally affix a label bearing the inscription of "Made in America", or any inscription with that meaning, to any product sold in or shipped to the United States, if that product is not a domestic product.

#### (b) Report

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall each submit, before January 1, 1994, a report to the Congress on procurements of products that are not domestic products.

#### (c) "Domestic product" defined

For the purposes of this section, the term "domestic product" means a product—

(1) that is manufactured or produced in the United States; and

(2) at least 50 percent of the cost of the articles, materials, or supplies of which are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title IX, §920, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3883.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 51.51 Passport fees. The Department collects the following passport fees in the amounts prescribed in the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services (22 CFR 22.1): ( a ) An application fee, which must be paid at the time of application, except as provided in § 51.52, and is not refundable, except as provided in § 51.53.
( b ) An execution fee, except as provided in § 51.52, when the applicant is required to execute the application in person before a person authorized to administer oaths for passport purposes. The execution fee is collected at the time of application and is not refundable (see § 51.55). When execution services are provided by an official of a State or local government or of the United States Postal Service (USPS), the State or local government or USPS may retain the fee if authorized to do so by the Department.
( c ) A fee for expedited passport processing, if applicable (see § 51.56).
( d ) A surcharge in the amount of twenty-two dollars ($22) on the filing of each application for a passport book, in the amount of twenty-two dollars ($22) on the filing of each application for a passport card for an applicant age 16 or over, and in the amount of fifteen dollars ($15) on the filing of each application for a passport card for an applicant under age 16, in order to cover the costs of meeting the increased demand for passports as a result of actions taken to comply with section 7209(b) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458 (8 U.S.C. 1185 note). The surcharge will be recovered by the Department of State from within the passport application fee reflected in the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services.
( e ) An “enhanced border security” surcharge on the filing of each application for a regular passport in an amount set administratively by the Department and published in the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services.
( f ) Any other fee that the Department is authorized or required by law to charge for passport services.
( g ) The foregoing fees are applicable regardless of the validity period of the passport.
[72 FR 64931, Nov. 19, 2007; 73 FR 5435, Jan. 30, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 36535, June 28, 2010]