alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Francis Hughes, Appellant.

In the trial of defendant-appellant for robbery in the first degree, the complaining witness wias permitted over objection to testify that when the police captured defendant the complainant identified him as one of two men who held him up and that the man thus identified was the defendant. The theory on which this evidence of identification was received was that it was part of the *res gestee.*It seems clear, however, that the proof was not admissible on this ground. *(People*v. *Marks,*6 N Y 2d 67; Richardson, Evidence [8th/ed.], § 263). The identification of the defendant was not part of the spontaneous movement of events which constitute the crime. It occurred half an hour after the crime was completed; and four blocks away from the scene, when the police pulled defendant out from under an automobile. Complainant testified as to what he then said: “ I said he was the man that covered me with the gun.” Four policemen also were permitted to testify to this identification of the defendant by the complainant. This testimony was inadmissible on additional grounds. *(People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471; *People*v. *Jung Ring,*212 N. Y. 393; *People*v. *Oliver,*4 A D 2d 28, affd. 3 N Y 2d 684.) The decision in *People*v. *Curtis*(225 N Y 519, 523) cited by the People, in which the statement came “ within ten seconds ” of the occurrence, is not controlling here. Nor does the silence of defendant at the time of the accusation constitute an admission against interest as argued by the People. The record shows nothing on this subject; it does not show specifically that defendant was silent after the identification; but if it did specifically show, his silence in response to an accusation while he was being taken into police custody or after he was in custody, such silence would not be an admission against interest. Although the complaining witness testified that the defendant in court was the person he had identified as the one who had “covered” him with a gun, the record fails to show that the complainant testified directly anywhere in the trial that this defendant was actually the same person who had in fact held him up with a gun. We feel required on this record to order a new trial. Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
§ 129.1 Purpose. ( a ) Section 38(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) provides that persons engaged in the business of brokering activities shall register and pay a registration fee as prescribed in regulations, and that no person may engage in the business of brokering activities without a license issued in accordance with the Act.
( b ) All brokering activities identified in this subchapter apply equally to those defense articles and defense services designated in § 121.1 of this subchapter and those items designated in 27 CFR 447.21 (U.S. Munitions Import List).
[78 FR 52690, Aug. 26, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 3833, Jan. 23, 2020]
§ 99.32(a)(4) –

Final regulations also added § 99.32(a)(4) to require that, upon the request of a 

parent or eligible student, an educational agency or institution must obtain a copy of 

the record of further redisclosures described under § 99.32(b)(2) and make it 

available for review to the parent or eligible student.

State educational authorities and Federal officials and agencies that maintain records 

of redisclosures will have to make that information available to the educational 

agency or institution whose records were redisclosed, upon request, so that the 

agency or institution can make that record available to a parent or eligible student 

who has asked to inspect and review the student’s record of disclosures. We estimate 

that two educational authorities or agencies in each State and the District of 

Columbia (one for K-12 and one for postsecondary) and the Department itself, for a 

total of 103 authorities, will maintain the required records of redisclosures. We 

assume that it will take .25 hours (15 minutes) per disclosure to locate and print a 

record of disclosures for this requirement. Based on our administrative experience 

over the years, we assume that few parents and students request this information and, 

therefore, use an estimate that one tenth of one percent of a total of 68.1 million 

students will make such a request each year, or 68,076 requests. This translates to an 

average of 3 disclosures per school. (Divided total number of schools by total 

number of requests.) The total number of disclosures by State and Federal 

educational authorities will be the same as that calculated for schools. 

No. of Schools & Postsec. Inst.: 20,629

Average No. of Discloures: x 3

# of Responses 61,887

Hours/Response: x .25

Burden Hours 15,472

Average No. of Disclosures by 

 State & Fed. Ed. Authorities: 61,887

Hours/Response: x .25

Burden Hours 15,472 

School Burden Hours: 15,472

State & Fed. Burden Hours: + 15,472

Total Burden Hours 30,944
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JUBENAL AMEZOLA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 08-0919 WHA

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR REDUCTION 

OF SENTENCE UNDER

AMENDMENT 782

Defendant Jubenal Amezola moves, pro se, for a reduction of his sentence under 18

U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The United States

Probation Office has submitted a report in opposition, stating that defendant is not eligible for a

lower sentence.

Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, effective November 1,

2014, reduces the penalties for most drug offenses by reducing most offense levels. This

amendment may be applied retroactively to reduce the sentences of previously sentenced

inmates under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Amendment 782 does not authorize, however, reductions

in sentences when a defendant’s offense level is not changed by the revised guidelines.

In 2010, defendant pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than eight

kilograms of methamphetamine. Based on this quantity of drugs, defendant’s offense level was

Case 3:08-cr-00919-WHA Document 147 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

38 and he received a sentence of 180 months. Under the amended sentencing tables,

defendant’s offense level, based on the quantity of drugs he possessed, remains at 38. 

Defendant is thus ineligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782. Defendant’s

motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00919-WHA Document 147 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Oscar L. Gubelman and Others v. Panama Railroad Company and *964Others.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J.,

Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
### §300hh–13. Evaluation of new and emerging technologies regarding bioterrorist attack and other public health emergencies

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall promptly carry out a program to periodically evaluate new and emerging technologies that, in the determination of the Secretary, are designed to improve or enhance the ability of public health or safety officials to conduct public health surveillance activities relating to a bioterrorist attack or other public health emergency.

#### (b) Certain activities

In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable—

(1) survey existing technology programs funded by the Federal Government for potentially useful technologies;

(2) promptly issue a request, as necessary, for information from non-Federal public and private entities for ongoing activities in this area; and

(3) evaluate technologies identified under paragraphs (1) and (2) pursuant to subsection (c).

#### (c) Consultation and evaluation

In carrying out subsection (b)(3), the Secretary shall consult with the working group under section 247d–6(a) 1 of this title, as well as other appropriate public, nonprofit, and private entities, to develop criteria for the evaluation of such technologies and to conduct such evaluations.

#### (d) Report

Not later than 180 days after June 12, 2002, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, a report on the activities under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–188, title I, §126, June 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 615.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 247d–6 of this title, referred to in subsec. (c), was amended by Pub. L. 109–417, title III, §304, Dec. 19, 2006, 120 Stat. 2859, and as so amended, subsec. (a) of section 247d–6 no longer relates to a working group.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27651]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>10003]


State of North Carolina (NC-00001)

    Pender County and the contiguous counties of Bladen, Brunswick, 
Columbus, Duplin, New Hanover, Onslow, and Sampson in the State of 
North Carolina constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused 
by tornadoes created from remnants of Hurricane Charley that occurred 
August 12-13, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a 
result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on 
February 8, 2005 and for economic injury until the close of business on 
September 9, 2005 at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 
Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303.

    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:.................     6.375
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:..............     3.187
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:.................     5.800
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           2.900
   Available Elsewhere:.......................................
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit          4.875
   Available Elsewhere:.......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           2.900
   Credit Available Elsewhere:................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10003 
and for economic damage is 10004.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-27651 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 41.53 Temporary workers and trainees. ( a ) *Requirements for H classification.* An alien shall be classifiable under INA 101(a)(15)(H) if: ( 1 ) The consular officer is satisfied that the alien qualifies under that section; and either
( 2 ) With respect to the principal alien, the consular officer has received official evidence of the approval by DHS, or by the Department of Labor in the case of temporary agricultural workers, of a petition to accord such classification or of the extension by DHS of the period of authorized entry in such classification; or
( 3 ) The consular officer is satisfied the alien is the spouse or child of an alien so classified and is accompanying or following to join the principal alien.
( b ) *Petition approval.* The approval of a petition by the Department of Homeland Security or by the Department of Labor does not establish that the alien is eligible to receive a nonimmigrant visa.
( c ) *Validity of visa.* The period of validity of a visa issued on the basis of paragraph (a) to this section must not exceed the period indicated in the petition, notification, or confirmation required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( d ) *Alien not entitled to H classification.* The consular officer must suspend action on this alien's application and submit a report to the approving DHS office if the consular officer knows or has reason to believe that an alien applying for a visa under INA 101(a)(15)(H) is not entitled to the classification as approved.
( e ) *“Trainee” defined.* The term *Trainee,* as used in INA 101(a)(15)(H)(iii), means a nonimmigrant alien who seeks to enter the United States temporarily at the invitation of an individual, organization, firm, or other trainer for the purpose of receiving instruction in any field of endeavor (other than graduate medical education or training), including agriculture, commerce, communication, finance, government, transportation, and the professions.
( f ) *Former exchange visitor.* Former exchange visitors who are subject to the 2-year residence requirement of INA 212(e) are ineligible to apply for visas under INA 101(a)(15)(H) until they have fulfilled the residence requirement or obtained a waiver of the requirement.
[57 FR 31449, July 16, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 1833, Jan. 24, 1996; 65 FR 52306, Aug. 29, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer
of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 19, 2014

/s/ R. Greg
Smith

R. Greg Smith

Chief Financial Officer
ina
Ww
Fe
<
=
ca
ww
w
=
a

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
Chain Lakes

Red Rim-Daley

Sand Hills

Upper Muddy Creek Watershed/Grizzly
High Savery Dam

Stratton Sagebrush Steppe Research Area
Blowout Penstemon

Shirley Mountain Bat Cave

Como Bluff

10 Laramie Plains Lakes

11. Laramie Peak

ONOaAhWHN =

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Pathfinder
Reservoir

Seminoe
Reservoir

White Tailed Prairie Dog ACEC
Sweetwater

Dad

Shamrock Hills

Pathfinder

Bolton Ranch

Seminoe

Saratoga

Shirley Basin / Medicine Bow

HMB Historic Trails ACEC

ram7mmouooaownrpp

100

°
o
NO
S
b
So
fo)
So
for)
So

Miles

Map 2-8
Areas of Critical
Environmental Concern

Alternative 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,560
<PP&E>                                       1,975,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,104,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          946,639
<BONDS>                                        266,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,450,212
<COMMON>                                     3,633,442
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,192,606)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,104,542
<SALES>                                        116,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,491
<CGS>                                          111,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,331,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,354,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,354,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,354,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 19, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01504-CV

KATRINA MCPHERSON, Appellant

V.

MELISSA LOPEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-05725-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 15, 2019 second motion for an extension of time 

to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to September 16,

2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 4.15





Exhibit 4.15




THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated for reference the 1st day of August, 2010 (the “Amendment”).


		
	BETWEEN: 	 
	 	HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
	 	(the “Company”) 
	 
	AND: 	 
	 	JOHN DOCHERTY 
	 	(the “Executive”) 





		
	 	
WHEREAS:


	 
	
A.

	
the parties entered into an employment agreement dated for reference August 6, 2008, which was amended October 1st, 2009 (as so amended, the “Employment Agreement”);


	 
	
B.

	
the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement upon the terms set out in this Amendment;


	 
	
THEREFORE in consideration of the recitals, the following covenants and the payment of one dollar made by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each party, the parties agree on the following terms: 


	 
	
1.

	
The amendments set out in this Amendment are effective on and after August 1, 2010.


		
	
2.

	
All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that where this Amendment may be in conflict with the provisions of the Employment Agreement, then this Amendment shall govern.


		
	
3.

	
Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:


	 
	 	“3.1 Annual Base Salary 
	 
	 	
The Company shall pay or provide to the Executive, for his services under this Agreement, an annual salary of $300,000, payable semi-monthly on the fifteenth and the second last banking day of the month. Should the fifteenth day of any month not be a business day, the base salary otherwise due on such date shall be paid to the Executive on the immediately preceding business day.”


	 
	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. 


	




HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP.

Per:

/s/ Donald H. Segal

Authorized Signatory









/s/ John Docherty

JOHN DOCHERTY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            5746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   116479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      13311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                188462
<PP&E>                                          104471
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  861367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           441358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                      411496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    861367
<SALES>                                         284681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                284681
<CGS>                                           201542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   201542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 94385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2339)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1846)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
§ 505.4 Requirements and identification for making requests. ( a ) When you seek access to Agency records, you may present your written request, fax it to (202) 260-4394 or mail it to the FOIA/Privacy Act Office, Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, Suite 3349, 330 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20237. The FOIA/Privacy Act Office may be visited between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays.
( b ) When you seek access to Agency records, you will be requested to present identification. You must state your full name, date of birth and social security number. You must also include your present mailing address and zip code, and if possible, a telephone number.
( c ) When signing a statement confirming your identity, you should understand that knowingly and willfully seeking or obtaining access to records about another person under false pretenses is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.