# Appendix A

Federal Register Notice Soliciting

Comments on Information Collection

Requests

# 39092 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices

Abstract: Source Compliance and

State Action Reporting is an activity

whereby State, District, Local, and

Commonwealth governments (hereafter

referred to as either ‘‘states/locals’’ or

‘‘state and local agencies’’) make air

compliance and enforcement

information available to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA

or the Agency) on a cyclic basis via

input to the Air Facility System (AFS).

The information provided to EPA

includes compliance activities and

determinations, and enforcement

activities. EPA uses this information to

assess progress toward meeting

emission requirements developed under

the authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA

or the Act) to protect and maintain the

atmospheric environment and the

public health. The EPA and many of the

state and local agencies access the data

in AFS to assist them in the

management of their air pollution

control programs. This renewal

information collection request (ICR)

affects oversight of approximately

39,005 stationary sources by 99 state

and local agencies and the Federal EPA.

On average, the burden imposed by this

collection amounts to approximately

one-tenth of a full-time equivalent

employee for each small state and local

agency, one-fourth of a full-time

equivalent employee for each medium

sized state and local agency and one and

one-tenth of a full-time equivalent

employee for each large sized state and

local agency for national reporting of

compliance and enforcement related

data under all of the applicable Clean

Air Act programs.

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 92 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements which have subsequently

changed; train personnel to be able to

respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and

review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the

information.

Respondents/Affected Entities: State

and Local Agencies. Estimated Number of Respondents:

99.

Frequency of Response: Every 60

days.

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

54,384.

Estimated Total Annual Cost:

$2,843,187 in labor costs. There are no

capital or O&M costs.

Changes in the Estimates: There is a

decrease of 18,689 hours in the total

estimated burden currently identified in

the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR

Burdens. This decrease is due to a

continuing decrease in the number of

major sources in the reportable universe

and a reported decrease of time and

resources available for use in data

management by small and medium

sized agencies.

Dated: June 28, 2011.

Joseph A. Sierra,

Acting Director, Collection Strategies

Division.

[FR Doc. 2011–16728 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**



# ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

**AGENCY**

**[EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0439; EPA–HQ–OW–**

**2011–0442; EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0443; FRL–**

**9429–6]**



# Agency Information Collection

**Activities; Proposed Collection;**

**Comment Request; Disinfectants/**

**Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and**

**Radionuclides; Microbial; and Public**

**Water System Supervision Program**

**AGENCY** 

# : Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

**ACTION** 

# : Notice.

**SUMMARY** 

# : In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ), this document

announces that EPA is planning to

submit a request to renew existing

approved Information Collection

Requests (ICRs) to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB). The

ICRs scheduled to expire are

Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts,

Chemical and Radionuclides Rules ICR

expires on December 31, 2011;

Microbial Rules ICR expires on April 30,

2012; and Public Water System

Supervision ICR expires on March 31,

2012. Before submitting the ICR to OMB

for review and approval, EPA is

soliciting comments on specific aspects

of the proposed information collection

as described below.

**DATES** 

# : Comments must be submitted on

or before September 6, 2011.

**ADDRESSES** 

# : Submit your comments,

identified by the Docket ID EPA–HQ– OW–2011–0439 (Disinfectants/

Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and

Radionuclides Rules); EPA–HQ–OW–

2011–0442 (Microbial Rules); and EPA–

HQ–OW–2011–0443 (Public Water

System Supervision), by one of the

following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow

the on-line instructions for submitting

comments.

• E-mail: OW–Docket@epa.gov

• Mail: Water Docket, US

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Water Docket,

MC: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC 20460.

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,

Public Reading Room, EPA

Headquarters West Building, Room

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC. Such deliveries are

only accepted during the Docket’s

normal hours of operation, and special

arrangements should be made for

deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments

identified by the Docket ID numbers

identified in the **ADDRESSES** 

# section for

each item in the text. EPA’s policy is

that all comments received will be

included in the public docket without

change and may be made available

online at http://www.regulations.gov

, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes

information claimed to be Confidential

Business Information (CBI) or other

information whose disclosure is

restricted by statute. Do not submit

information that you consider to be CBI

or otherwise protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which

means EPA will not know your identity

or contact information unless you

provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send an e-mail comment directly

to EPA without going through

www.regulations.gov your e-mail

address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment

that is placed in the public docket and

made available on the Internet. If you

submit an electronic comment, EPA

recommends that you include your

name and other contact information in

the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA

cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact

you for clarification, EPA may not be

able to consider your comment.

Electronic files should avoid the use of

special characters, any form of

encryption, and be free of any defects or

viruses. For additional information

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA


# 39093 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

# : Matthew Reed, Drinking Water

Protection Division, Office of Ground

Water and Drinking Water, (4606M),

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20460; telephone number: 202–564–

4719; e-mail address:

reed.matthew@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

# :

How can I access the docket and/or

submit comments?

EPA has established a public docket

for each of the ICRs identified in the

**ADDRESSES** 

# section, which are available

for online viewing at http://

www.regulations.gov , or in person

viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The

telephone number for the Reading Room

is 202–566–1744, and the telephone

number for the Water Docket is 202–

566–2426.

Use http://www.regulations.gov to

obtain a copy of the draft collection of

information, submit or view public

comments, access the index listing of

the contents of the docket, and to access

those documents in the public docket

that are available electronically. Once in

the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in

the docket ID number identified in this

document.

What information is EPA particularly

interested in?

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of

the PRA, EPA specifically solicits

comments and information to enable it

to:

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the Agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(iv) minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated electronic,

mechanical, or other technological

collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting

electronic submission of responses. In

particular, EPA is requesting comments

from small public water systems (those

that serve less than 10,000 customers)

on examples of specific additional

efforts that EPA could make to reduce

the paperwork burden for small public

water systems affected by this

collection. The small public water

systems include community water

systems, and non-transient noncommunity water systems such as

schools and hospitals, in addition to

transient non-community water systems

such as restaurants and campgrounds.

What should I consider when I prepare

my comments for EPA?

You may find the following

suggestions helpful for preparing your

comments:

1. Explain your views as clearly as

possible and provide specific examples.

2. Describe any assumptions that you

used.

3. Provide copies of any technical

information and/or data you used that

support your views.

4. If you estimate potential burden or

costs, explain how you arrived at the

estimate that you provide.

5. Offer alternative ways to improve

the collection activity.

6. Make sure to submit your

comments by the deadline identified

under DATES.

7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,

be sure to identify the docket ID number

assigned to this action in the subject

line on the first page of your response.

You may also provide the name, date,

and Federal Register citation.

What information collection activity or

ICR does this apply to?

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–

0439.

Affected entities: Entities potentially

affected by this action are new and

existing public water systems (PWS),

primacy agencies, and EPA.

Title: Disinfectants/Disinfection

Byproducts, Chemical, and

Radionuclides Rules (Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1896.09,

OMB Control No. 2040–0204.

ICR status: This ICR is currently

scheduled to expire on December 31,

2011. An Agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information,

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40

of the CFR, after appearing in the

Federal Register when approved, are

listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed

either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means,

such as on the related collection

instrument or form, if applicable. The

display of OMB control numbers in

certain EPA regulations is consolidated

in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: The Disinfectants/

Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and

Radionuclides Rules ICR examines

PWS, primacy agency and EPA burden

and costs for recordkeeping and

reporting requirements in support of the

chemical drinking water regulations.

These recordkeeping and reporting

requirements are mandatory for

compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and

142. The following chemical regulations

are included: Stage 1 Disinfectants and

Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 1

DBPR), Stage 2 Disinfectants and

Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 2

DBPR), Chemical Phase Rules (Phases

II/IIB/V), 1976 Radionuclides Rule and

2000 Radionuclides Rule, Total

Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Rule,

Disinfectant Residual Monitoring and

Associated Activities under the Surface

Water Treatment Rule, Arsenic Rule,

Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) and

revisions. Future chemical-related

rulemakings will be added to this

consolidated ICR after the regulations

are finalized and the initial, rulespecific, ICRs are due to expire.

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 0.40 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements which have subsequently

changed; train personnel to be able to

respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and

review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the

information.

The ICR provides a detailed

explanation of the Agency’s estimate,

which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential

respondents: 246,048.

Frequency of response: varies by

requirement ( i.e., on occasion, monthly,

quarterly, semi-annually, annually,

biennially, and every 3, 6, and 9 years).


# 39094 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices

Estimated total average number of

responses for each respondent: varies by

requirement.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

6,987,131 hours.

Estimated total annualized capital/

startup costs: $6,918,000.

Estimated total annual maintenance

and operational costs: $203,672,204.

Are there changes in the estimates from

the last approval?

There is no estimated increase or

decrease of hours in the total estimated

respondent burden compared with that

identified in the ICR currently approved

by OMB.

What information collection activity or

ICR does this apply to?

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–

0442.

Affected entities: Entities potentially

affected by this action are new and

existing public water systems (PWS),

primacy agencies, and EPA.

Title: Microbial Rules (Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1895.07,

OMB Control No. 2040–0205

ICR status: This ICR is currently

scheduled to expire on April 30, 2012.

An Agency may not conduct or sponsor,

and a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information, unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number. The OMB control numbers for

EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,

after appearing in the Federal Register

when approved, are listed in 40 CFR

part 9, are displayed either by

publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on

the related collection instrument or

form, if applicable. The display of OMB

control numbers in certain EPA

regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR

part 9.

Abstract: The Microbial Rules

Renewal ICR examines PWS, primacy

agency and EPA burden and costs for

recordkeeping and reporting

requirements in support of the microbial

drinking water regulations. These

recordkeeping and reporting

requirements are mandatory for

compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and

142. The following microbial

regulations are included: Surface Water

Treatment Rule (SWTR), Total Coliform

Rule (TCR), Interim Enhanced Surface

Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR), Filter

Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), Long

Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR), Long

Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR), Ground

Water Rule, and the Aircraft Drinking

Water Rule. Although the Aircraft

Drinking Water Rule has a stand-alone ICR at this time, it is being included into

the Microbial ICR due to the nature of

information collected. The information

collected for the Aircraft Drinking Water

Rule is directly correlated to

information collected under the Total

Coliform Rule, and therefore is

appropriate to be included in the

Microbial ICR. Future microbial-related

rulemakings will be added to this

consolidated ICR after the regulations

are finalized and the initial, rulespecific, ICRs are due to expire.

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 0.79 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements which have subsequently

changed; train personnel to be able to

respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and

review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the

information.

The ICR provides a detailed

explanation of the Agency’s estimate,

which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential

respondents: 161,337.

Frequency of response: Varies by

requirement ( i.e., on occasion, monthly,

quarterly, semi-annually, and annually.

Estimated total average number of

responses for each respondent: 72.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

9,172,188 hours.

Estimated total annualized capital/

startup costs: $32,888,601.

Estimated total annual maintenance

and operational costs: $88,222,000.

Are there changes in the estimates from

the last approval?

There is an increase of 17,583 hours

in the total estimated respondent

burden compared with that identified in

the ICR currently approved by OMB.

This increase reflects EPA’s inclusion of

the information collection requirements

of the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule,

which was previously a stand-alone

ICR. What information collection activity or

ICR does this apply to?

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–

0443.

Affected entities: Entities potentially

affected by this action are new and

existing public water systems (PWS),

primacy agencies, and EPA.

Title: Public Water System

Supervision Program (Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 0270.45,

OMB Control No. 2040–0090.

ICR status: This ICR is currently

scheduled to expire on March 31, 2012.

An Agency may not conduct or sponsor,

and a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information, unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number. The OMB control numbers for

EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,

after appearing in the Federal Register

when approved, are listed in 40 CFR

part 9, are displayed either by

publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on

the related collection instrument or

form, if applicable. The display of OMB

control numbers in certain EPA

regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR

part 9.

Abstract: The Public Water System

Supervision (PWSS) Program Renewal

ICR examines PWS, primacy agency,

EPA, and tribal operator certification

provider burden and costs for ‘‘crosscutting’’ recordkeeping and reporting

requirements ( i.e., the burden and costs

for complying with drinking water

information requirements that are not

associated with contaminant-specific

rulemakings). These activities which

have record keeping and reporting

requirements that are mandatory for

compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and

142 include the following: Consumer

Confidence Reports (CCRs), Primacy

Regulation Activities, Variance and

Exemption Rule (V/E Rule), General

State Primacy Activities, Public

Notification (PN) and Proficiency

Testing Studies for Drinking Water

Laboratories. The information collection

activities for both the Operator

Certification/Expense Reimbursement

Program and the Capacity Development

Program are driven by the grant

withholding and reporting provisions

under Sections 1419 and 1420,

respectively, of the Safe Drinking Water

Act. Although the Tribal Operator

Certification Program is voluntary, the

information collection is driven by grant

eligibility requirements outlined in the

Drinking Water Infrastructure Grant

Tribal Set-Aside Program Final

Guidelines and the Tribal Drinking

Water Operator Certification Program

Guidelines.


# 39095 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 6.5 hours per

response. Burden means the total time,

effort, or financial resources expended

by persons to generate, maintain, retain,

or disclose or provide information to or

for a Federal agency. This includes the

time needed to review instructions;

develop, acquire, install, and utilize

technology and systems for the purposes

of collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements which have subsequently

changed; train personnel to be able to

respond to a collection of information;

search data sources; complete and

review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the

information.

The ICR provides a detailed

explanation of the Agency’s estimate,

which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential

respondents: 161,682.

Frequency of response: Varies by

requirement ( i.e., on occasion, monthly,

quarterly, semi-annually, and annually).

Estimated total average number of

responses for each respondent: 3.1.

Estimated total annual burden hours:

3,249,695 hours.

Estimated total annual costs:

$119,174,000. This includes an

estimated burden cost of $97,636,000

and an estimated cost of $21,538,000 for

capital investment or maintenance and

operational costs.

Are there changes in the estimates from

the last approval?

There is no estimated increase or

decrease of hours in the total estimated

respondent burden compared with that

identified in the ICR currently approved

by OMB.

What is the next step in the process for

these ICRs?

EPA will consider the comments

received and amend the ICRs as

appropriate. The final ICR packages will

then be submitted to OMB for review

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR

1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue

another Federal Register notice pursuant

to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce

the submission of the ICRs to OMB and

the opportunity to submit additional

comments to OMB. If you have any

questions about these ICRs or the

approval process, please contact the

technical person listed under **FOR**

**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**



# . Dated: June 28, 2011.

Ronald W. Bergman,

Acting Director, Office of Ground Water and

Drinking Water.

[FR Doc. 2011–16731 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**



# ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

**AGENCY**

**[EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651; FRL–9428–8]**



# Compatibility of Underground Storage

**Tank Systems With Biofuel Blends**

**AGENCY** 

# : Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

**ACTION** 

# : Notice of final guidance.

**SUMMARY** 

# : EPA is issuing final guidance

on how owners and operators of

underground storage tanks (USTs) can

demonstrate compliance with the

Federal compatibility requirement for

UST systems storing gasoline containing

greater than 10 percent ethanol or diesel

containing greater than 20 percent

biodiesel.

**ADDRESSES** 

# : EPA established a docket

for this action under Docket ID No.

EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. All

documents and public comments in the

document are available at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at

the UST Docket in the EPA

Headquarters Library, located at EPA

West Building, Room 3334, 1301

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is

open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding

Federal holidays. The telephone number

for the Public Reading Room is (202)

566–1744. The telephone number for

the UST Docket is (202) 566–0270.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

# : Andrea Barbery, Office of Underground

Storage Tanks, Mail Code 5402P, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20460; telephone number: (703)

603–7137; e-mail address:

barbery.andrea@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

# :

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

This guidance is for owners and

operators of underground storage tank

(UST) systems (hereafter referred to as

tank owners) regulated by 40 CFR Part

280, who intend to store gasoline

blended with greater than 10 percent

ethanol or diesel blended with greater

than 20 percent biodiesel.

40 CFR Part 280, and therefore this

guidance, applies in Indian country and in states and territories (hereafter

referred to as states) that do not have

state program approval (SPA). You can

view a map of SPA states with approved

UST programs at: http://www.epa.gov/

oust/states/spamap.htm. SPA states

may find this guidance relevant and

useful because they also have a

compatibility requirement that is similar

to the Federal compatibility

requirement. You can view statespecific requirements for SPA states at:

http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/

spa

_ frs.htm.

B. How can I get copies of this document

and other related information?

1. Docket. EPA has established a

docket for this action under Docket ID

No. EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. Publicly

available docket materials are available

either electronically through

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at

the UST Docket in the EPA Docket

Center, located at EPA West Building,

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,

NW., Washington, DC 20460. The EPA

Docket Center Public Reading Room is

open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding

Federal holidays. The telephone number

for the Public Reading Room is (202)

566–1744. The telephone number for

the UST Docket is (202) 566–0270.

2. Electronic Access. EPA established

a docket for this action under Docket ID

No. EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. All

documents and public comments in the

document are available at http://

www.regulations.gov. In addition to

being available in the UST docket, an

electronic copy of this guidance is also

available on EPA’s Office of

Underground Storage Tanks Web site at

http://www.epa.gov/oust.

II. Background

A. Statutory Authority

This guidance discusses the Federal

UST compatibility requirement

promulgated under the authority of

Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal

Act (SWDA), as amended. 42 U.S.C.

6991b et seq. You can find this

requirement, which is referenced and

discussed in the guidance, in 40 CFR

280.32.

B. Underground Storage Tank

Compatibility Requirement

To protect groundwater, a source of

drinking water for nearly half of all

Americans, the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) regulates UST

systems storing petroleum or hazardous

substances under authority of Subtitle I

of the Solid Waste Disposal Act

(SWDA), as amended. Tanks storing


# Appendix B

Surface Water Treatment Rule

SpreadsheetsRequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostRaw WaterColiformsSampling182,3924,784154,925$ 53,349$ N/AOn SiteInspections &WatershedManagement181861,7321,999,125$ N/A N/ARaw WaterTurbidityMonitoring1852,5603,395109,927$ 13,676$ 7,001$RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostFinished WaterTurbidityMonitoring6,30517,984,6041,713,70855,496,729$ 4,347,445$ 2,199,120$RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostTotals forUnfiltered andFiltered Systems6,32318,039,5741,783,61957,760,706$ 4,414,470$ 2,206,121$RequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnual CapitalCostFinished WaterTurbidityMonitoring5776,108266,88911,687,587$ N/A N/AExhibit B.1a - SWTR Unfiltered System Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1b - SWTR Filtered System Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1d - SWTR State Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit B.1c - Total SWTR PWS (Filtered + Unfiltered System) Burden and Cost SummaryNote: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in theDBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 1 December 2011B.2a - Number of SystemsCWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC<100 9832571,3474161206321-3415120629101-500 2,1532644986451513754--641151375501-1,000 1,173868634850632--34650631,001-3,300 2,527756494934501--94834503,301-10K 2,14329231,010717---1,01071710,001-50K 1,920629751-5--9701-50,001-100K 3921-224--1--223--100,001-1M 3251-237-----237-->1M 18-117--1--16--Total 11,6357192,0214,8223631,13815-34,8073631,135Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GWsystems within a given size category.B.2b - Filtered Non-Purchased PlantsCWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC<100 1.021.001.00422120629101-500 1.061.001.00677151375501-1,000 1.031.001.0035750631,001-3,300 1.001.001.0094834503,301-10K 1.071.001.001,08071710,001-50K 1.081.001.001,0481-50,001-100K 1.351.001.00301--100,001-1M 1.691.001.00400-->1M 1.691.001.0027--Total 5,2593631,135Plants Per System(SW/GWUDI)PopulationCategoryTotal Filtered Non-Purchased Plants(SW/GWUDI)Source: Plants per system for CWSs: From 2006 Community Water Systems Survey. Includes treated surfacewater entry points.Exhibit B.2 - SWTR System InventorySource: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.PopulationCategoryFiltered Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDIUnfiltered Surface Water/GWUDISurface Waterand GWUDI Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDIMicrobial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 2 December 2011O&M CostsCWS NTNC TNC Collect Analysis O&M (materials) Labor Sample Collection AnalysisAnalyticalMaterials(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost)<100 32.38$ 1-3521122.30$ 32.38$ 2082086,736$ 2086,736$ 4,639$101-500 32.38$ 4--521122.30$ 32.38$ 2082086,736$ 2086,736$ 4,639$501-1,000 32.38$ 2--1041122.30$ 32.38$ 2082086,736$ 2086,736$ 4,639$1,001-3,300 32.38$ 1--1041122.30$ 32.38$ 1041043,368$ 1043,368$ 2,320$3,301-10K 32.38$ ---1561122.30$ 32.38$ ---$ --$ -$10,001-25K 32.38$ 3--2081122.30$ 32.38$ 62462420,208$ 62420,208$ 13,917$25,001-50K 32.38$ 2--2601122.30$ 32.38$ 52052016,840$ 52016,840$ 11,598$50,001-100K 32.38$ 1--2601122.30$ 32.38$ 2602608,420$ 2608,420$ 5,799$100,001-1M 32.38$ ---2601122.30$ 32.38$ ---$ --$ -$>1M 32.38$ 1--2601122.30$ 32.38$ 2602608,420$ 2608,420$ 5,799$Total 15-31,7162,3922,39277,463$ 2,39277,463$ 53,349$Unfiltered systems must measure total or fecal coliform density of source water 1-5 times per week, depending on system size (40 CFR 141.74(b)(1)).Cost/SampleExhibit B.3 - Raw Water Coliforms Burden and Cost (Unfiltered Systems)Sources: Cost per sample from ICR for proposed Aircraft Drinking Water Rule, updated from 2006 to 2010 dollars. Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Number of UnfilteredSystems (SW and GWUDI)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateYearly SampleFreq.Labor Hours Per SampleLaborTotalSamples/YearMicrobial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 3 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC (hrs)(cost)<100 32.38$ 1-3481926,218$101-500 32.38$ 4--11546014,897$501-1,000 32.38$ 2--22144214,314$1,001-3,300 32.38$ 1--41841813,537$3,301-10K 32.38$ ---826--$10,001-25K 32.38$ 3--1,4114,423143,250$25,001-50K 32.38$ 2--2,1604,028130,456$50,001-75K 32.38$ 1--2,9471,98964,419$75,001-100K 32.38$ 0--4,0701,32342,836$100,001-500K 32.38$ ---7,392--$500,001-1M 32.38$ ---15,792--$>1M 32.38$ 1--48,45648,4561,569,199$Total 15-361,7321,999,125$Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Exhibit B.4 - On Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden and Cost(Unfiltered Systems)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateHours/System/YearNumber of Unfiltered Systems(SW and GWUDI)Total Annual Burden and CostMicrobial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 4 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationContinuousMonitoringVerification GrabSamples(15 min./day)*365(1 min/reading)*6 readings/day*365(10 min/sample)*1sample/day*365<100 32.38$ 1-3100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 75424,428.33$101-500 32.38$ 4--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 75424,428.33$501-1,000 32.38$ 2--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 37712,214.17$1,001-3,300 32.38$ 1--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 1896,107.08$3,301-10K 32.38$ ---100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 --$10,001-25K 32.38$ 3--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 56618,321.25$25,001-50K 32.38$ 2--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 37712,214.17$50,001-100K 32.38$ 1--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 1896,107.08$100,001-1M 32.38$ ---100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 --$>1M 32.38$ 1--100% 91.3 36.5 60.8 1896,107.08$Total 15-33,395109,927.49$The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40CFR 141.74(b)(2)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.Exhibit B.5 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Unfiltered Systems)Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Labor Hours/System/Year(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRate% Cont.MonitoringTotal LaborHours/YearTotal LaborCost/YearNumber of UnfilteredSystems (SW and GWUDI)Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 5 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationVerificationGrab SamplesContinuousMonitoringGrabSamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab Sampling1 per day1 per day Materials MaterialsUnit O&M costs *# SystemsUnit O&M costs *# Systems In-line turbidimeterBench-TopUnit1/7 of systems replaceper year1/7 of systemsreplace per year<100 1-3100% 365365380$ 380$ 1,520$ 1,520$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 868$ 687$101-500 4--100% 365365380$ 380$ 1,520$ 1,520$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 868$ 687$501-1,000 2--100% 365365380$ 380$ 760$ 760$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 434$ 344$1,001-3,300 1--100% 365365380$ 380$ 380$ 380$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 217$ 172$3,301-10K ---100% 365365380$ 380$ -$ -$ 1,520$ 1,203$ -$ -$10,001-25K 3--100% 365365380$ 380$ 1,140$ 1,140$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 651$ 516$25,001-50K 2--100% 365365380$ 380$ 760$ 760$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 434$ 344$50,001-100K 1--100% 365365380$ 380$ 380$ 380$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 217$ 172$100,001-1M ---100% 365365380$ 380$ -$ -$ 1,520$ 1,203$ -$ -$>1M 1--100% 365365380$ 380$ 380$ 380$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 217$ 172$Total 15-36,838$ 6,838$ 3,907$ 3,093$The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40 CFR 141.74(b)(2)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.Annual Capital CostsNumber of UnfilteredSystems (SW andGWUDI)Exhibit B.6 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Unfiltered Systems)Activities/System/YearNote: O&M unit costs and capital unit costs have been updated from 2000 to 2010 dollars.Capital Unit CostsPopulationCategory% Cont.MonitoringAnnual O&M Unit CostsAnnual O&M CostsMicrobial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 6 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationContinuousMonitoringVerificationGrab SamplesGrab SampleOnly(15 min./day)*365(1 min/reading)*6 readings/day*365(10 min/sample)*1sample/day*365(15 min/sample)*6sample/day*365<100 32.38$ 41512162850% 913761548481,87415,605,022$101-500 32.38$ 64015037650% 913761548482,48615,624,818$501-1,000 32.38$ 3465063100% 91376154886,5832,803,905$1,001-3,300 32.38$ 9473450100% 913761548194,4746,297,837$3,301-10K 32.38$ 1,011717100% 913761548195,2236,322,090$10,001-25K 32.38$ 6011-100% 913761548113,5273,676,464$25,001-50K 32.38$ 369--100% 91376154869,5872,253,514$50,001-100K 32.38$ 224--100% 91376154842,2431,367,987$100,001-1M 32.38$ 237--100% 91376154844,6941,447,379$>1M 32.38$ 16--100% 9137615483,01797,713$Total 4,8073631,1351,713,70855,496,729$Exhibit B.7 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Filtered Systems)Note: EPA assumes that 50 percent of systems serving 500 or fewer will monitor turbidity with grab samples rather than continuous monitoring. Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011consultations with water industry representatives.PopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRate% Cont.MonitoringTotal LaborHours/YearTotal LaborCost/YearNumber of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW andGWUDI)Labor Hours/System/Year(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 7 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CalibrationVerificationGrab SamplesRoutine GrabSamplesContinuousMonitoringGrabSamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab SamplingContinuousMonitoring Grab Sampling1 per day1 per day 6 per day Materials MaterialsUnit O&M costs *# SystemsUnit O&M costs *# Systems In-line turbidimeterBench-TopUnit1/7 of systemsreplace per year1/7 of systemsreplace per year<100 41512162850% 3653652,190380$ 380$ 221,263$ 442,527$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 126,436$ 200,191$101-500 64015037650% 3653652,190380$ 380$ 221,544$ 443,088$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 126,597$ 200,445$501-1,000 3465063100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 174,416$ 174,416$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 99,666$ 78,902$1,001-3,300 9473450100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 391,754$ 391,754$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 223,860$ 177,222$3,301-10K 1,011717100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 393,263$ 393,263$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 224,722$ 177,905$10,001-25K 6011-100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 228,693$ 228,693$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 130,682$ 103,456$25,001-50K 369--100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 140,179$ 140,179$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 80,102$ 63,414$50,001-100K 224--100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 85,095$ 85,095$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 48,626$ 38,495$100,001-1M 237--100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 90,034$ 90,034$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 51,448$ 40,729$>1M 16--100% 365365N/A 380$ 380$ 6,078$ 6,078$ 1,520$ 1,203$ 3,473$ 2,750$Total 4,8073631,1351,952,319$ 2,395,126$ 1,115,611$ 1,083,510$Annual Capital CostsNumber of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW andGWUDI)Exhibit B.8 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Filtered Systems)Activities/System/YearNote: EPA assumes that 50 percent of SWTR systems serving 500 or fewer take grab samples only; the other 50 percent monitor continuously. O&M unit costs and capital unit costs updated from 2000 to 2010 dollars.Capital Unit CostsPopulationCategory% Cont.MonitoringAnnual O&M Unit CostsAnnual O&M CostsMicrobial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 8 December 2011Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original and Revised BurdenEstimatesNo changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.Exhibit B.9Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR B - 9 December 2011

# Appendix C

Total Coliform Rule SpreadsheetsRequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnualCapital CostSystem Monitoring 152,9793,668,4423,508,253113,611,40881,817,746N/ARequirementAnnualRespondentsAvg. AnnualResponsesAnnualBurdenAnnual Burden(Labor) CostAnnual O&MCostAnnualCapital CostMonitoring RelatedActivities571,835,748458,93720,097,769N/A N/ASanitary Surveys 57---N/A N/ATotal 571,835,748458,93720,097,769N/A N/ANumber of responses for monitoring for states is based on number of PWS respondents and assumes 1 response per system per month.State burden for monitoring assumes 15 minutes to review each system's data each month.Exhibit C.1b - TCR State Burden and Cost SummaryExhibit C.1a - TCR PWS Burden and Cost SummaryNote: Sanitary survey burden for surface water systems is included under IESWTR. Sanitary survey burden for ground water systems is nowincluded under the GWR (see App. G).Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 1 December 2011Exhibit C.2 - Calculating Average Number of TCR Samples for 3 System Types, CombinedAll PWSsMinimum Minimum AddtnlPopulation Routine/ Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRange month next mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I<25-500 1 4 4 28,524 28,524 15,559 15,559 80,440 80,440 124,523 124,523501-1k 1 4 4 5,636 5,636 1,745 1,745 2,051 2,051 9,432 9,4321,001-2.5K 2 3 3 6,480 12,960 747 1,494 573 1,146 7,800 15,6002,501-3.3K 3 3 2 1,741 5,223 92 276 59 177 1,892 5,6763,301-4.1K 4 3 1 1,163 4,652 51 204 28 112 1,242 4,9684,101-4.9K 5 3 0 821 4,105 15 75 10 50 846 4,2304,901-5.8K 6 3 0 780 4,680 26 156 20 120 826 4,9565,801-6.7K 7 3 0 598 4,186 10 70 9 63 617 4,3196,701-7.6K 8 3 0 458 3,664 13 104 8 64 479 3,8327,601-8.5K 9 3 0 433 3,897 8 72 4 36 445 4,0058,501-10k 10 3 0 629 6,290 9 90 10 100 648 6,48010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 687 6,870 7 70 2 20 696 6,96012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 761 11,415 5 75 3 45 769 11,53517,201-21.5K 20 3 0 468 9,360 0 0 0 0 468 9,36021,501-25K 25 3 0 311 7,775 0 0 1 25 312 7,80025,001-33K 30 3 0 452 13,560 3 90 2 60 457 13,71033,001-41K 40 3 0 346 13,840 1 40 0 0 347 13,88041,001-50K 50 3 0 215 10,750 2 100 0 0 217 10,85050,001-59K 60 3 0 189 11,340 0 0 1 60 190 11,40059,001-70K 70 3 0 146 10,220 0 0 1 70 147 10,29070,001-83K80 3 0 101 8,0801 80 0 0 102 8,16083,001-96K 90 3 0 85 7,650 0 0 0 0 85 7,65096,001-130K 100 3 0 134 13,400 0 0 1 100 135 13,500130,001-220K 120 3 0 149 17,880 1 120 0 0 150 18,000220,001-320K 150 3 0 64 9,600 0 0 0 0 64 9,600320,001-450K 180 3 0 27 4,860 0 0 0 0 27 4,860450,001-600K 210 3 0 13 2,730 0 0 0 0 13 2,730600,001-780K 240 3 0 18 4,320 0 0 0 0 18 4,320780,001-970K 270 3 0 8 2,160 0 0 0 0 8 2,160970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 5 1,500 0 0 0 0 5 1,5001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 7 2,310 0 0 0 0 7 2,3101,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 4 1,440 0 0 0 0 4 1,4401,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 1 390 0 0 1 390 2 7802,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 3 1,260 0 0 0 0 3 1,2603,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 1 450 0 0 0 0 1 450Over 3,960K 480 3 0 2 960 0 0 0 0 2 960Total 51,460 257,937 18,295 20,420 83,224 85,129 152,979 363,486TCR Samples - combined GW+SW/GWUDIAddtnl TNCWSsPopulation Routine Repeat RoutinesPopRange next mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K<25-500 1.0 4 4 28,524 28,524 15,559 15,559 80,440 80440.00 124,523 124,523501-1k 1.0 4 4 5,636 5,636 1,745 1,745 2,051 2051.00 9,432 9,4321,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 6,480 12,960 747 1,494 573 1146.00 7,800 15,6002,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 1,741 5,223 92 276 59 177.00 1,892 5,6763,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 1,163 4,652 51 204 28 112.00 1,242 4,9684,101-10K 7.2 3 0 3,719 26,822 81 567 61 433.00 3,861 27,82210,001-25k 15.9 3 0 2,227 35,420 12 145 6 90.00 2,245 35,65525,001-50k 37.7 3 0 1,013 38,150 6 230 2 60.00 1,021 38,440Over 50K 105.1 3 0 957 100,550 2 200 4 620.00 963 101,370Total 51,460 257,937 18,295 20,420 83,224 85129.00 152,979 363,486Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.CWSs NTNCWSs Total PWSsMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 2 December 2011AddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRange next mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I<25-500 1 4 4 3,136 3,136 521 521 1,845 1,845 5,502 5,502501-1k 1 4 4 1,173 1,173 86 86 86 86 1,345 1,3451,001-2.5K 2 3 3 1,897 3,795 62 124 51 102 2,010 4,0212,501-3.3K 3 3 2 630 1,890 13 39 13 39 656 1,9683,301-4.1K 4 3 1 446 1,784 5 20 5 20 456 1,8244,101-4.9K 5 3 0 332 1,660 2 10 3 15 337 1,6854,901-5.8K 6 3 0 344 2,064 10 60 6 36 360 2,1605,801-6.7K 7 3 0 277 1,942 3 21 5 35 285 1,9986,701-7.6K 8 3 0 215 1,720 4 32 0 0 219 1,7527,601-8.5K 9 3 0 205 1,845 3 27 1 9 209 1,8818,501-10k 10 3 0 324 3,240 2 20 3 30 329 3,29010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 362 3,620 3 30 0 0 365 3,65012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 434 6,510 1 15 1 15 436 6,54017,201-21.5K 20 3 0 290 5,800 0 0 0 0 290 5,80021,501-25K 25 3 0 177 4,425 0 0 0 0 177 4,42525,001-33K 30 3 0 285 8,550 1 30 1 30 287 8,61033,001-41K 40 3 0 225 9,000 0 0 0 0 225 9,00041,001-50K 50 3 0 147 7,350 1 50 0 0 148 7,40050,001-59K 60 3 0 120 7,200 0 0 0 0 120 7,20059,001-70K 70 3 0 105 7,350 0 0 0 0 105 7,35070,001-83K80 3 0 77 6,1601 80 0 0 78 6,24083,001-96K 90 3 0 70 6,300 0 0 0 0 70 6,30096,001-130K 100 3 0 107 10,700 0 0 0 0 107 10,700130,001-220K 120 3 0 118 14,160 1 120 0 0 119 14,280220,001-320K 150 3 0 59 8,850 0 0 0 0 59 8,850320,001-450K 180 3 0 24 4,320 0 0 0 0 24 4,320450,001-600K 210 3 0 13 2,730 0 0 0 0 13 2,730600,001-780K 240 3 0 15 3,600 0 0 0 0 15 3,600780,001-970K 270 3 0 7 1,890 0 0 0 0 7 1,890970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 4 1,200 0 0 0 0 4 1,2001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 6 1,980 0 0 0 0 6 1,9801,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 4 1,440 0 0 0 0 4 1,4401,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 390 1 3902,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 3 1,260 0 0 0 0 3 1,2603,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 1 450 0 0 0 0 1 450Over 3,960K 480 3 0 2 960 0 0 0 0 2 96011,635 150,054 719 1,286 2,021 2,652 14,376 153,992TCR Sampling - SW/GWUDIAddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat RoutinesPopRange next mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K<25-500 1.0 4 4 3,136 3,136 521 521 1,845 1,845 5,502 5,502501-1k 1.0 4 4 1,173 1,173 86 86 86 86 1,345 1,3451,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 1,897 3,795 62 124 51 102 2,010 4,0212,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 630 1,890 13 39 13 39 656 1,9683,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 446 1,784 5 20 5 20 456 1,8244,101-10K 7.3 3 0 1,697 12,471 24 170 18 125 1,739 12,76610,001-25k 16.1 3 0 1,263 20,355 4 45 1 15 1,268 20,41525,001-50k 37.9 3 0 657 24,900 2 80 1 30 660 25,010Over 50K 109.6 3 0 735 80,550 2 200 1 390 738 81,140Total 11,635 150,054 719 1,286 2,021 2,652 14,376 153,992CWSs - SW NTNCWSs - SWSURFACE/GWUDIExhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Surface/GWUDI SystemsTNCWSs - SW Total PWSs - SWMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 3 December 2011Ground WaterAddtnlPopulation Routine Repeat Routines CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs Total PWSsRange next mo Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems Samples Systems SamplesA B C D E=D*A F G=F*A H I=H*A J=D+F+H K=E+G+I<25-500 1 4 4 25,388 25,388 15,038 15,038 78,595 78,595 119,021 119,021501-1k 1 4 4 4,463 4,463 1,659 1,659 1,965 1,965 8,087 8,0871,001-2.5K 2 3 3 4,583 9,165 685 1,370 522 1,044 5,790 11,5792,501-3.3K 3 3 2 1,111 3,333 79 237 46 138 1,236 3,7083,301-4.1K 4 3 1 717 2,868 46 184 23 92 786 3,1444,101-4.9K 5 3 0 489 2,445 13 65 7 35 509 2,5454,901-5.8K 6 3 0 436 2,616 16 96 14 84 466 2,7965,801-6.7K 7 3 0 321 2,244 7 49 4 28 332 2,3216,701-7.6K 8 3 0 243 1,944 9 72 8 64 260 2,0807,601-8.5K 9 3 0 228 2,052 5 45 3 27 236 2,1248,501-10k 10 3 0 305 3,050 7 70 7 70 319 3,19010,001-12.9k 10 3 0 325 3,250 4 40 2 20 331 3,31012,901-17.2K 15 3 0 327 4,905 4 60 2 30 333 4,99517,201-21.5K 20 3 0 178 3,560 0 0 0 0 178 3,56021,501-25K 25 3 0 134 3,350 0 0 1 25 135 3,37525,001-33K 30 3 0 167 5,010 2 60 1 30 170 5,10033,001-41K 40 3 0 121 4,840 1 40 0 0 122 4,88041,001-50K 50 3 0 68 3,400 1 50 0 0 69 3,45050,001-59K 60 3 0 69 4,140 0 0 1 60 70 4,20059,001-70K 70 3 0 41 2,870 0 0 1 70 42 2,94070,001-83K80 3 0 24 1,9200 0 0 0 24 1,92083,001-96K 90 3 0 15 1,350 0 0 0 0 15 1,35096,001-130K 100 3 0 27 2,700 0 0 1 100 28 2,800130,001-220K 120 3 0 31 3,720 0 0 0 0 31 3,720220,001-320K 150 3 0 5 750 0 0 0 0 5 750320,001-450K 180 3 0 3 540 0 0 0 0 3 540450,001-600K 210 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0600,001-780K 240 3 0 3 720 0 0 0 0 3 720780,001-970K 270 3 0 1 270 0 0 0 0 1 270970,001-1,230K 300 3 0 1 300 0 0 0 0 1 3001,230,001-1,520K 330 3 0 1 330 0 0 0 0 1 3301,520,001-1,850K 360 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01,850,001-2,270K 390 3 0 1 390 0 0 0 0 1 3902,270,001-3,020K 420 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03,020,001-3,960K 450 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Over 3,960K 480 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 39,825 107,883 17,576 19,134 81,203 82,477 138,603 209,494TCR Sampling - Ground WaterMin Min AddtnlPopulation Samp/ Repeat RoutinesPopRange month next mo Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys Samples Sys SamplesA B C D E=D*A G H=G*A J K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K<25-500 1.0 4 4 25,388 25,388 15,038 15,038 78,595 78,595 119,021 119,021501-1k 1.0 4 4 4,463 4,463 1,659 1,659 1,965 1,965 8,087 8,0871,001-2.5K 2.0 3 3 4,583 9,165 685 1,370 522 1,044 5,790 11,5792,501-3.3K 3.0 3 2 1,111 3,333 79 237 46 138 1,236 3,7083,301-4.1K 4.0 3 1 717 2,868 46 184 23 92 786 3,1444,101-10K 7.1 3 0 2,022 14,351 57 397 43 308 2,122 15,05610,001-25k 15.6 3 0 964 15,065 8 100 5 75 977 15,24025,001-50k 37.2 3 0 356 13,250 4 150 1 30 361 13,430Over 50K 90.1 3 0 222 20,000 0 0 3 230 225 20,230Total 39,825 107,883 17,576 19,134 81,203 82,477 138,603 209,494Exhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Ground Water SystemsTNCWSs - GW Total PWSs - GWNTNCWSs - GWCWSs - GWMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 4 December 2011Exhibit C.3 - Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring)Complete System InventoryPopulation CWSs NTNCWSs TNCWSs NCWSsRange GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total<25-500 25,388 3,136 28,524 15,038 521 15,559 78,595 1,845 80,440 93,633 2,366 95,999501-1K 4,463 1,173 5,636 1,659 86 1,745 1,965 86 2,051 3,624 172 3,7961,001-2.5K 4,583 1,897 6,480 685 62 747 522 51 573 1,207 113 1,3202,501-3.3K 1,111 630 1,741 79 13 92 46 13 59 125 26 1513,301-4.1K 717 446 1,163 46 5 51 23 5 28 69 10 794,101-10K 2,022 1,697 3,719 57 24 81 43 18 61 100 42 14210,001-25K 964 1,263 2,227 8 4 12 5 1 6 13 5 1825,001-50K 356 657 1,013 4 2 6 1 12538Over 50K 222 735 957 0 2 2 3 14336Total 39,825 11,635 51,460 17,576 719 18,29581,203 2,021 83,22498,778 2,741 101,519Source: TCR Inventory, pages C-1 through C-9CWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesCWS Inventory CWSs with MCL Vios (# of Samples) CWSs with TC+ Samples CWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (from TCR Inventory)3 x # of Vios ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I<25-500 25,388 3,136 28,524 1,144 53 1,197 3,432 159 3,591 21,956 2,977 24,933501-1K 4,463 1,173 5,636 130 17 147 390 51 441 4,073 1,122 5,1951,001-2.5K 4,583 1,897 6,480 164 42 206 492 126 618 4,091 1,771 5,8622,501-3.3K 1,111 630 1,741 44 17 61 132 51 183 979 579 1,5583,301-4.1K 717 446 1,163 32 10 42 96 30 126 621 416 1,0374,101-10K 2,022 1,697 3,719 110 60 170 330 180 510 1,692 1,517 3,20910,001-25K 964 1,263 2,227 69 62 131 207 186 393 757 1,077 1,83425,001-50K 356 657 1,013 27 17 44 81 51 132 275 606 881Over 50K 222 735 957 5 11 16 15 33 48 207 702 909Total 39,825 11,635 51,460 1,725 289 2,014 5,175 867 6,042 34,650 10,768 45,418Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS/FED October 2010. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that triggerrepeat sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 5 December 2011Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring) continuedNCWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesNCWS Inventory NCWSs with MCL Vios NCWSs with TC+ Samples NCWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (from TCR Inventory) 3.96% = Vio Rate 3 x # of Vios ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I<25-500 93,633 2,366 95,999 3,781283,809 11,343 84 11,427 82,290 2,282 84,572501-1K 3,624 172 3,796 1261127 378 3 381 3,246 169 3,4151,001-2.5K 1,207 113 1,320 58462 174 12 186 1,033 101 1,1342,501-3.3K 125 26 151 718 21 3 24 104 23 1273,301-4.1K 69 10 79 3-3 9 0 9 60 10 704,101-10K 100 42 142 527 15 6 21 85 36 12110,001-25K 13 5 18 1-1 3 0 3 10 5 1525,001-50K 5 3 8 0 0 00538Over 50K 3 3 6 0 0 00336Total 98,778 2,741 101,519 3,981 36 4017 11,943 108 12,051 86,835 2,633 89,468All Systems with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ SamplesTotal PWS Inventory PWSs with MCL Vios PWSs with TC+ Samples PWSs with "Clean" SamplesPopulation (CWS + NCWS) (CWS + NCWS) ( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )Range GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalA B C D E F G=D*3 H=E*3 I=F*3 J=A-G K=B-H L=C-I<25-500 119,021 5,502 124,523 4,925 81 5006 14,775 243 15,018 104,246 5,259 109,505501-1K 8,087 1,345 9,432 256 18 274 768 54 822 7,319 1,291 8,6101,001-2.5K 5,790 2,010 7,800 222 46 268 666 138 804 5,124 1,872 6,9962,501-3.3K 1,236 656 1,892 51 18 69 153 54 207 1,083 602 1,6853,301-4.1K 786 456 1,242 35 10 45 105 30 135 681 426 1,1074,101-10K 2,122 1,739 3,861 115 62 177 345 186 531 1,777 1,553 3,33010,001-25K 977 1,268 2,245 70 62 132 210 186 396 767 1,082 1,84925,001-50K 361 660 1,021 27 17 44 81 51 132 280 609 889Over 50K 225 738 963 5 11 16 15 33 48 210 705 915Total 138,603 14,376 152,979 5,706 325 6031 17,118 975 18,093 121,485 13,401 134,886Inventory for Calculating Inventory for CalculatingPopulation Routine Monitoring Repeat/Addtl Routine MonRange GW* SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI TotalM NO P Q R<25-500 - TC+* 14,775 243 15,018 14,775 243 15,018<25-500 - rest 104,246 5,259 109,505 0 0 0501-1K - TC+* 768 54 822 768 54 822501-1K - rest 7,319 1,291 8,610 0 0 01,001-2.5K 5,790 2,010 7,800 666 138 8042,501-3.3K 1,236 656 1,892 153 54 2073,301-4.1K 786 456 1,242 105 30 1354,101-10K 2,122 1,739 3,861 345 186 53110,001-25K 977 1,268 2,245 210 186 39625,001-50K 361 660 1,021 81 51 132Over 50K 225 738 963 15 33 48Total 138,603 14,376 152,979 17,118 975 18,093* GW CWSs (serving 1,000 or less) with TC+ results sample monthly rather than quarterly.(CWS + NCWS)Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS/FED October 2010. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that triggerrepeat sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 6 December 2011Exhibit C.4 - Sampling - Burden, Cost, and Frequencies of MonitoringGWSize Labor Labor Hours Required Analytical Cost/Sample Monitoring Number of Minimum Addtl For Systems that are TC+, Routine Sliding TC+Category Rates Collection AnalysisSamples for Total Coliforms Samples for Fecal/E.coliFrequency per Year Routine Repeat Routines Percentage of Routine Samples Repeat scale- TC+ Repeat($/hr)(hrs/sample) (hrs/sample) PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor Most Other*Smp/Sys Samples next moSamples Assumed to Be TC+that=TC+ RepeatsA B C D E F=C*A G H I=C*A J K L M N O P=L*O Q=P*M R S=Q*R<25-500 $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 4 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.0501-1K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 4 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.01,001-2.5K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 2.0 3 3 50% 1.0 3.0 50% 1.52,501-3.3K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 3.0 3 2 50% 1.5 4.5 25% 1.13,301-4.1K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 4.0 3 1 50% 2.0 6.0 25% 1.54,101-10K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 7.1 3 0 25% 1.8 5.4 25% 1.410,001-25K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 15.6 3 0 25% 3.9 11.7 25% 2.925,001-50K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 37.2 3 0 10% 3.7 11.1 25% 2.8Over 50K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 90.1 3 0 10% 9.0 27.0 10% 2.7SW/GWUDISize Labor Labor Hours Required Analytical Cost/Sample Number of Minimum Addtl For Systems that are TC+, Routine Sliding TC+Category Rates Collection AnalysisSamples for Total Coliforms Samples for Fecal/E.coliRoutine Repeat Routines Percentage of Routine Samples Repeat scale-TC+ Repeat($/hr) (hrs/sample) (hrs/sample) PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-labor PurchServ O&M-matrl O&M-laborSmp/Sys Samples next moSamples Assumed to Be TC+that=TC+ RepeatA B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P=L*O Q=P*M R S=Q*R<25-500 $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.0501-1K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 1.0 4 4 100% 1.0 4.0 50% 2.01,001-2.5K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 2.0 3 3 50% 1.0 3.0 50% 1.52,501-3.3K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 3.0 3 2 50% 1.5 4.5 25% 1.13,301-4.1K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 4.0 3 1 50% 2.0 6.0 25% 1.54,101-10K $32.38 0.5 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 7.3 3 0 25% 1.8 5.4 25% 1.410,001-25K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 16.1 3 0 25% 4.0 12.0 25% 3.025,001-50K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 37.9 3 0 10% 3.8 11.4 25% 2.9Over 50K $32.38 1.0 0.166667 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 $0.00 $22.30 $5.40 12 109.6 3 0 10% 11.0 33.0 10% 3.3Notes:Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industryrepresentatives. Overall sample costs are conservative estimates. Many systems now use a method allowing forboth total coliforms and fecal/E.coli to be tested at one time. Average sample cost based on research conductedfor the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule in Nov. 2006.Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems ineach size category.* GW CWSs serving <=1,000 with TC-positive samples monitor monthly rather than quarterly.Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems ineach size category.MonitoringFrequencyper YearMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 7 December 2011Exhibit C.5 - Routine Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Routine-GWMonitoring Routine Total Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total CostGW Routine MonitoringSize Number of Frequency Samples/ Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs per System O&M Labor per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs per YearSysSys/Yr(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials (hrs)per YearBurden - HoursCostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = J or Kfrom"Sampling"C = Lfrom"Sampling"D = B * C E = D*B from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = D*C from"Sampling"H= G*A from"Sampling"I = D*E from"Sampling"J = E+G K = I L = F+ H M = K + L N = A * J O = A * M P = A * K Q = A * L<25-500 - TC+* 14,775 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $194.30 2.0 $64.77 $267.64 8.0 $267.64 $259.07 $526.71 118,200.0 $7,782,137.01 $3,954,348.21 $3,827,788.80<25-500 - rest 104,246 4 1.0 4.0 2.0$64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 281,463.0 $18,414,913.67 $9,300,016.13 $9,114,897.54501-1K - TC+* 768 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $194.30 2.0 $64.77 $267.64 8.0 $267.64 $259.07 $526.71 6,144.0 $404,513.11 $205,545.82 $198,967.30501-1K - rest 7,319 4 1.0 4.0 2.0$64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 19,760.2 $1,292,823.36 $652,909.82 $639,913.531,001-2.5K 5,790 12 2.0 24.0 12.0 $388.61 4.0 $129.54 $535.28 16.0 $535.28 $518.14 $1,053.42 92,632.6 $6,098,809.36 $3,098,996.57 $2,999,812.792,501-3.3K 1,236 12 3.0 36.0 18.0 $582.91 6.0 $194.30 $802.91 24.0 $802.91 $777.22 $1,580.13 29,664.0 $1,953,039.87 $992,400.89 $960,638.983,301-4.1K 786 12 4.0 48.0 24.0 $777.22 8.0 $259.07 $1,070.55 32.0 $1,070.55 $1,036.29 $2,106.84 25,152.0 $1,655,975.55 $841,453.18 $814,522.374,101-10K 2,122 12 7.1 85.2 42.6 $1,379.56 14.2 $459.85 $1,899.94 56.8 $1,899.94 $1,839.41 $3,739.35 120,503.2 $7,933,174.86 $4,030,797.76 $3,902,377.1010,001-25K 977 12 15.6 187.5 187.5 $6,072.00 31.3 $1,013.62 $4,182.53 218.8 $4,182.53 $7,085.62 $11,268.15 213,767.6 $11,008,986.08 $4,086,336.12 $6,922,649.9625,001-50K 361 12 37.2 446.6 446.6 $14,462.69 74.4 $2,409.37 $9,961.24 521.0 $9,961.24 $16,872.06 $26,833.30 188,081.0 $9,686,821.89 $3,596,006.79 $6,090,815.10Over 50K 225 12 90.1 1,081.1 1081.1 $35,010.34 180.2 $5,835.60 $24,111.51 1261.3 $24,111.51 $40,845.94 $64,957.45 283,792.5 $14,615,426.47 $5,425,090.15 $9,190,336.32Total 138,603 1,940.4 1,827.8 $59,191.48 323.5 $10,476.22 $43,277.67 2,151.3 $43,277.67 $69,667.70 $112,945.37 1,379,160.1 $80,846,621.23 $36,183,901.44 $44,662,719.79*GW CWSs serving 1000 or fewer with TC-positive samples.b. Routine-SWMonitoring Routine Total Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total CostSW Routine MonitoringSize Number ofFrequencySamples/Samples/Sample CollectionAnalysis (in-houseAnalytical Costsper System O&M Laborper System Total Annua Total Annua O&M CostLabor CostCategoryPWSs per YearSysSys/Yr(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials (hrs) (F+H) (I+J)per YearBurdenCostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = J or Kfrom"Sampling"C = Lfrom"Sampling"D = B * C E = D*B from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = D*C from"Sampling"H= G*A from"Sampling"I = D*E from"Sampling"J = E+G K = I L = F+ H M = K + L N = A * J O = A * M P = A * K Q = A * L<25-500 5,502 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $194.30 2.0 $64.77 $267.64 8.0 $267.64 $259.07 $526.71 44,019.6 $2,898,192.81 $1,472,662.79 $1,425,530.03501-1K 1,345 12 1.0 12.0 6.0 $194.30 2.0 $64.77 $267.64 8.0 $267.64 $259.07 $526.71 10,763.3 $708,643.98 $360,084.26 $348,559.721,001-2.5K 2,010 12 2.0 24.0 12.0 $388.61 4.0 $129.54 $535.28 16.0 $535.28 $518.14 $1,053.42 32,167.4 $2,117,863.23 $1,076,152.82 $1,041,710.412,501-3.3K 656 12 3.0 36.0 18.0 $582.91 6.0 $194.30 $802.91 24.0 $802.91 $777.22 $1,580.13 15,744.0 $1,036,564.85 $526,711.15 $509,853.703,301-4.1K 456 12 4.0 48.0 24.0 $777.22 8.0 $259.07 $1,070.55 32.0 $1,070.55 $1,036.29 $2,106.84 14,592.0 $960,718.64 $488,171.31 $472,547.334,101-10K 1,739 12 7.3 88.2 44.1 $1,428.13 14.7 $476.04 $1,966.33 58.8 $1,966.33 $1,904.18 $3,870.51 102,280.5 $6,732,614.19 $3,420,363.04 $3,312,251.1410,001-25K 1,268 12 16.1 193.4 193.4 $6,263.07 32.2 $1,042.76 $4,313.35 225.6 $4,313.35 $7,305.83 $11,619.19 286,060.8 $14,733,126.75 $5,469,333.80 $9,263,792.9525,001-50K 660 12 37.9 454.8 454.8 $14,728.24 75.8 $2,454.71 $10,143.35 530.6 $10,143.35 $17,182.95 $27,326.30 350,196.0 $18,035,358.06 $6,694,610.79 $11,340,747.26Over 50K 738 12 109.6 1,315.1 1315.1 $42,588.20 219.2 $7,098.57 $29,330.92 1534.3 $29,330.92 $49,686.77 $79,017.69 1,132,313.4 $58,315,053.15 $21,646,216.00 $36,668,837.15Total 14,376 2,183.5 2,073.4 $67,144.99 363.9 $11,784.54 $48,697.97 2,437.3 $48,697.97 $78,929.52 $127,627.49 1,988,137.0 $105,538,135.65 $41,154,305.96 $64,383,829.69Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 8 December 2011Exhibit C.6 - Repeat Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Repeat-GWRepeat Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year) Total Cost GW Repeat MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Number Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) of Samples Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations)B = Q from"Sampling"C = B*B from"Sampling"D = C*A from"Sampling"E = B *C from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = B*E from"Sampling"H = C + E J = G K = D + F L = J + K M = A * B N = A * H O = A * L P = A * J Q = A * K<25-500 14,775 4 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 59100 39,892.5 $2,610,003.75 $1,318,077.75 $1,291,926.00501-1K 768 4 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 3072 2,073.6 $135,667.20 $68,513.28 $67,153.921,001-2.5K 666 3 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 1998 1,332.0 $87,698.88 $44,562.06 $43,136.822,501-3.3K 153 4.5 2.3 $74.48 0.8 $25.91 $100.36 3.1 $100.36 $100.39 $200.75 689 474.3 $30,714.75 $15,355.08 $15,359.673,301-4.1K 105 6 3.0 $97.15 1.0 $32.38 $133.82 4.0 $133.82 $129.53 $263.35 630 420.0 $27,651.75 $14,051.10 $13,600.654,101-10K 345 5.4 2.7 $87.44 0.9 $29.15 $120.44 3.6 $120.44 $116.59 $237.03 1863 1,242.0 $81,775.35 $41,551.80 $40,223.5510,001-25K 210 11.7 11.7 $378.89 2.0 $64.77 $260.95 13.7 $260.95 $443.66 $704.61 2457 2,877.0 $147,968.10 $54,799.50 $93,168.6025,001-50K 81 11.1 11.1 $359.46 1.9 $61.53 $247.56 13.0 $247.56 $420.99 $668.55 899 1,053.0 $54,152.55 $20,052.36 $34,100.19Over 50K 15 27 27.0 $874.37 4.5 $145.73 $602.19 31.5 $602.19 $1,020.10 $1,622.29 405 472.5 $24,334.35 $9,032.85 $15,301.50Total 17,118 63.3 $2,049.91 13.0 $421.00 $1,710.65 76.3 $1,710.65 $2,470.91 $4,181.56 71,11349,836.9 $3,199,966.68 $1,585,995.78 $1,613,970.90Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.b. Repeat-SWRepeat Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year) Total Cost SW Repeat MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Number Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategoryPWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) of Samples Burden Cost(C x R) (C x S)A (from"SystemswithViolations)B = Q from"Sampling"C = B*B from"Sampling"D = C*A from"Sampling"E = B *C from"Sampling"F = E*A from"Sampling"G = B*E from"Sampling"H = C + E J = G K = D + F L = J + K M = A * B N = A * H O = A * L P = A * J Q = A * K<25-500 243 4 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 972 656.1 $42,925.95 $21,678.03 $21,247.92501-1K 54 4 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 216 145.8 $9,539.10 $4,817.34 $4,721.761,001-2.5K 138 3 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 414 276.0 $18,171.84 $9,233.58 $8,938.262,501-3.3K 54 4.5 2.3 $74.48 0.8 $25.91 $100.36 3.1 $100.36 $100.39 $200.75 243 167.4 $10,840.50 $5,419.44 $5,421.063,301-4.1K 30 6 3.0 $97.15 1.0 $32.38 $133.82 4.0 $133.82 $129.53 $263.35 180 120.0 $7,900.50 $4,014.60 $3,885.904,101-10K 186 5.4 2.7 $87.44 0.9 $29.15 $120.44 3.6 $120.44 $116.59 $237.03 1004 669.6 $44,087.58 $22,401.84 $21,685.7410,001-25K 186 12 12.0 $388.61 2.0 $64.77 $267.64 14.0 $267.64 $453.38 $721.02 2232 2,604.0 $134,109.72 $49,781.04 $84,328.6825,001-50K 51 11.4 11.4 $369.18 1.9 $61.53 $254.26 13.3 $254.26 $430.71 $684.97 581 678.3 $34,933.47 $12,967.26 $21,966.21Over 50K 33 33 33.0 $1,068.67 5.5 $178.11 $736.00 38.5 $736.00 $1,246.78 $1,982.78 1089 1,270.5 $65,431.74 $24,288.00 $41,143.74Total 975 69.9 $2,263.65 14.0 $453.38 $1,857.85 83.9 $1,857.85 $2,717.03 $4,574.88 6,9326,587.7 $367,940.40 $154,601.13 $213,339.27Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 9 December 2011Exhibit C.7 - Fecal / E.coli Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Fecal/E. Coli - GWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost GW Fecal/E. coli MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"Systems withViolations")B = P + S(both from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *H (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J<25-500 14,775 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 29,550.0 $1,945,572.00 $988,595.25 $956,976.75501-1K 768 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 1,536.0 $101,130.24 $51,386.88 $49,743.361,001-2.5K 666 2.5 1.3 $42.10 0.4 $12.95 $55.76 1.7 $55.76 $55.05 $110.81 1,132.2 $73,799.46 $37,136.16 $36,663.302,501-3.3K 153 2.6 1.3 $42.10 0.4 $12.95 $57.99 1.7 $57.99 $55.05 $113.04 260.1 $17,295.12 $8,872.47 $8,422.653,301-4.1K 105 3.5 1.8 $58.29 0.6 $19.43 $78.06 2.4 $78.06 $77.72 $155.78 252.0 $16,356.90 $8,196.30 $8,160.604,101-10K 345 3.2 1.6 $51.81 0.5 $16.19 $71.37 2.1 $71.37 $68.00 $139.37 724.5 $48,082.65 $24,622.65 $23,460.0010,001-25K 210 6.8 6.8 $220.21 1.1 $35.62 $151.66 7.9 $151.66 $255.83 $407.49 1,659.0 $85,572.90 $31,848.60 $53,724.3025,001-50K 81 6.5 6.5 $210.50 1.1 $35.62 $144.97 7.6 $144.97 $246.12 $391.09 615.6 $31,678.29 $11,742.57 $19,935.72Over 50K 15 11.7 11.7 $378.89 2.0 $64.77 $260.95 13.7 $260.95 $443.66 $704.61 205.5 $10,569.15 $3,914.25 $6,654.90Total 17,118 34.0 $1,101.06 7.1 $229.91 $954.58 41.1 $954.58 $1,330.97 $2,285.55 35,934.9 $2,330,056.71 $1,166,315.13 $1,163,741.58Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.b. Fecal/E. Coli - SWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost SW Fecal/E. coli MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"Systems withViolations")B = P + S(both from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *H (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J<25-500 243 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 486.0 $31,998.24 $16,259.13 $15,739.11501-1K 54 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 108.0 $7,110.72 $3,613.14 $3,497.581,001-2.5K 138 2.5 1.3 $42.10 0.4 $12.95 $55.76 1.7 $55.76 $55.05 $110.81 234.6 $15,291.78 $7,694.88 $7,596.902,501-3.3K 54 2.6 1.3 $42.10 0.4 $12.95 $57.99 1.7 $57.99 $55.05 $113.04 91.8 $6,104.16 $3,131.46 $2,972.703,301-4.1K 30 3.5 1.8 $58.29 0.6 $19.43 $78.06 2.4 $78.06 $77.72 $155.78 72.0 $4,673.40 $2,341.80 $2,331.604,101-10K 186 3.2 1.6 $51.81 0.5 $16.19 $71.37 2.1 $71.37 $68.00 $139.37 390.6 $25,922.82 $13,274.82 $12,648.0010,001-25K 186 7.0 7.0 $226.69 1.2 $38.86 $156.12 8.2 $156.12 $265.55 $421.67 1,525.2 $78,430.62 $29,038.32 $49,392.3025,001-50K 51 6.7 6.7 $216.97 1.1 $35.62 $149.43 7.8 $149.43 $252.59 $402.02 397.8 $20,503.02 $7,620.93 $12,882.09Over 50K 33 14.3 14.3 $463.09 2.4 $77.72 $318.94 16.7 $318.94 $540.81 $859.75 551.1 $28,371.75 $10,525.02 $17,846.73Total 975 37.0 $1,198.21 7.6 $246.10 $1,021.49 44.6 $1,021.49 $1,444.31 $2,465.80 3,857.1 $218,406.51 $93,499.50 $124,907.01Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 10 December 2011Exhibit C.8 - Additional Routine Monitoring - Burden and Costa. Additional Routines - GWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost GW Addtl Routine MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = N (from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *E (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J<25-500 14,775 4.0 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 39,892.5 $2,610,003.75 $1,318,077.75 $1,291,926.00501-1K 768 4.0 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 2,073.6 $135,667.20 $68,513.28 $67,153.921,001-2.5K 666 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 1,332.0 $87,698.88 $44,562.06 $43,136.822,501-3.3K 153 2.0 1.0 $32.38 0.3 $9.72 $44.61 1.3 $44.61 $42.10 $86.71 198.9 $13,266.63 $6,825.33 $6,441.303,301-4.1K 105 1.0 0.5 $16.19 0.2 $6.48 $22.30 0.7 $22.30 $22.67 $44.97 73.5 $4,721.85 $2,341.50 $2,380.354,101-10K 345 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0010,001-25K 210 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0025,001-50K 81 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Over 50K 15 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Total 17,118 7.0 $226.69 2.4 $77.73 $312.24 9.4 $312.24 $304.42 $616.66 43,570.5 $2,851,358.31 $1,440,319.92 $1,411,038.39Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.b. Additional Routines - SWTC+ Labor (per System per Year) O&M Total Burden Cost (per System per Year)Total Cost SW Addtl Routine MonitoringSize Samples/ Sample Collection Analysis (in-house) Analytical Costs (per System O&M Labor (per System Total Annual Total Annual O&M Cost Labor CostCategory PWSs System(hrs) (cost) (hrs) (cost) Materials per Year) (hrs)per Year) Burden CostA (from"SystemswithViolations")B = N (from"Sampling")C = B *B (from"Sampling")D = C *A (from"Sampling")E = B *C (from"Sampling")F = E *A (from"Sampling")G = B *E (from"Sampling")H = C + E I = G J = D + F K = I + J L = A * H M = A * K N = A * I O = A * J<25-500 243 4.0 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 656.1 $42,925.95 $21,678.03 $21,247.92501-1K 54 4.0 2.0 $64.77 0.7 $22.67 $89.21 2.7 $89.21 $87.44 $176.65 145.8 $9,539.10 $4,817.34 $4,721.761,001-2.5K 138 3.0 1.5 $48.58 0.5 $16.19 $66.91 2.0 $66.91 $64.77 $131.68 276.0 $18,171.84 $9,233.58 $8,938.262,501-3.3K 54 2.0 1.0 $32.38 0.3 $9.72 $44.61 1.3 $44.61 $42.10 $86.71 70.2 $4,682.34 $2,408.94 $2,273.403,301-4.1K 30 1.0 0.5 $16.19 0.2 $6.48 $22.30 0.7 $22.30 $22.67 $44.97 21.0 $1,349.10 $669.00 $680.104,101-10K 186 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0010,001-25K 186 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0025,001-50K 51 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Over 50K 33 0.0 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Total 975 7.0 $226.69 2.4 $77.73 $312.24 9.4 $312.24 $304.42 $616.66 1,169.1 $76,668.33 $38,806.89 $37,861.44Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 11 December 2011Exhibit C.9 - System Responses - Monitoring EventsRoutine MonitoringInventory of Samples perPopulation Public Water Systems System per YearRange GW* SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI TotalA(from M of"Systems withViolations")B(from N of"Systems withViolations")C = A + B D(from J or K of"Sampling" * Lfrom"Sampling)E((from J or K of"Sampling" * Lfrom"Sampling))F = A * D G = B * E H = F + G<25-500 - TC+* 14,775 243 15,018 12 12 177,300 2,916 180,216<25-500 - rest 104,246 5,259 109,505 4 12 416,982 63,113 480,096501-1K - TC+* 768 54 822 12 12 9,216 648 9,864501-1K - rest 7,319 1,291 8,610 4 12 29,274 15,497 44,7711,001-2.5K 5,790 2,010 7,800 24 24 138,949 48,251 187,2002,501-3.3K 1,236 656 1,892 36 36 44,496 23,616 68,1123,301-4.1K 786 456 1,242 48 48 37,728 21,888 59,6164,101-10K 2,122 1,739 3,861 85 88 180,728 153,358 334,08610,001-25K 977 1,268 2,245 188 193 183,218 245,227 428,44525,001-50K 361 660 1,021 447 455 161,233 300,164 461,398Over 50K 225 738 963 1081 1315 243,243 970,545 1,213,789Total 138,603 14,376 152,979 1,622,367 1,845,224 3,467,591* GW CWSs with TC+ results sample monthly.Repeat MonitoringFrequency ofPopulation Monitoring per YearRange GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI TotalA(from P of"Systems withViolations")B(from Q of"Systems withViolations")C = A + B D(from Q of"Sampling")E(from Q of"Sampling")F = A * D G = B * E H = F + G<25-500 14,775 243 15,018 4 4 59,100 972 60,072501-1K 768 54 822 4 4 3,072 216 3,2881,001-2.5K 666 138 804 3 3 1,998 414 2,4122,501-3.3K 153 54 207 4.5 4.5 689 243 9323,301-4.1K 105 30 135 6 6 630 180 8104,101-10K 345 186 531 5.4 5.4 1,863 1,004 2,86710,001-25K 210 186 396 11.7 12 2,457 2,232 4,68925,001-50K 81 51 132 11.1 11.4 899 581 1,481Over 50K 15 33 48 27 33 405 1,089 1,494Total 17,118 975 18,093 71,113 6,932 78,044Number of ResponsesRepeat Monitoring Events per YearNumber of ResponsesRoutine Monitoring Events per YearInventory ofPublic Water SystemsMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 12 December 2011Exhibit C.9 continued - System Responses - Monitoring EventsFecal -E. coliMonitoringFrequency ofPopulation Monitoring per YearRange GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI TotalA(from P of"Systems withViolations")B(from Q of"Systems withViolations")C = A + B D(from P + S of"Sampling")E(from P + S of"Sampling")F = A * D G = B * E H = F + G<25-500 14,775 243 15,018 3 3 44,325 729 45,054501-1K 768 54 822 3 3 2,304 162 2,4661,001-2.5K 666 138 804 2.5 2.5 1,665 345 2,0102,501-3.3K 153 54 207 2.6 2.6 398 140 5383,301-4.1K 105 30 135 3.5 3.5 368 105 4734,101-10K 345 186 531 3.2 3.2 1,104 595 1,69910,001-25K 210 186 396 6.8 7 1,428 1,302 2,73025,001-50K 81 51 132 6.5 6.7 527 342 868Over 50K 15 33 48 11.7 14.3 176 472 647Total 17,118 975 18,093 52,293 4,192 56,486Additional Routine MonitoringFrequency ofPopulation Monitoring per YearRange GW SW/GUDI Total GW SW/GUDI GW SW/GUDI TotalA(from P of"Systems withViolations")B(from Q of"Systems withViolations")C = A + B D(from N of"Sampling")E(from N of"Sampling")F = A * D G = B * E H = F + G<25-500 14,775 243 15,018 4 4 59,100 972 60,072501-1K 768 54 822 4 4 3,072 216 3,2881,001-2.5K 666 138 804 3 3 1,998 414 2,4122,501-3.3K 153 54 207 2 2 306 108 4143,301-4.1K 105 30 135 1 1 105 30 1354,101-10K 345 186 531 0 0 0 0 010,001-25K 210 186 396 0 0 0 0 025,001-50K 81 51 132 0 0 0 0 0Over 50K 15 33 48 0 0 0 0 0Total 17,118 975 18,093 64,581 1,740 66,321Public Water SystemsInventory ofPublic Water SystemsNumber of ResponsesE. coliMonitoring Events per YearNumber of ResponsesAdd'l Routine Monitoring Events per YearInventory ofMicrobial Rules ICR - TCR C - 13 December 2011Exhibit C.10 - Total Burden and Cost for TCRSystem TCR TotalsTotal Burden in Hours Total Cost O&M Cost Labor CostMonitoring GW SW Total GW SW Total GW SW Total GW SW TotalRoutine 1,379,160.1 1,988,137.0 3,367,297.1 $80,846,621.23 $105,538,135.65 $186,384,756.89 $36,183,901.44 $41,154,305.96 $77,338,207.40 $44,662,719.79 $64,383,829.69 $109,046,549.48Repeat 49,836.9 6,587.7 56,424.6 $3,199,966.68 $367,940.40 $3,567,907.08 $1,585,995.78 $154,601.13 $1,740,596.91 $1,613,970.90 $213,339.27$1,827,310.17Fecal/E. coli 35,934.9 3,857.1 39,792.0 $2,330,056.71 $218,406.51 $2,548,463.22 $1,166,315.13 $93,499.50 $1,259,814.63 $1,163,741.58 $124,907.01 $1,288,648.59Addtl Routine 43,570.5 1,169.1 44,739.6 $2,851,358.31 $76,668.33 $2,928,026.64 $1,440,319.92 $38,806.89 $1,479,126.81 $1,411,038.39 $37,861.44 $1,448,899.83Total 1,508,502.4 1,999,750.9 3,508,253.3 $89,228,002.93 $106,201,150.89 $195,429,153.83 $40,376,532.27 $41,441,213.48 $81,817,745.75 $48,851,470.66 $64,759,937.41 $113,611,408.07Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 14 December 2011Exhibit C.11 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and CostA. Community Water SystemsGW CWSs GW CWS TotalSize Inventory of Unit Burden for Unit Labor Systems w SSurveys Annual AnnualCategoryGW Systems SSurvey CostAnnual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *State LaborRateD E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E<25-500 25,38812525.50$ 0% -0 -$501-1K 4,463241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$1,001-2.5K 4,583241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$2,501-3.3K 1,111241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$3,301-4.1K 717361,576.51$ 0% -0 -$Total 36,261-0 -$Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.B. Nontransient Noncommunity SystemsGW NTNCWSs GW NTNC TotalSize Inventory of Unit Burden for Unit Labor Systems w SSurveys Annual AnnualCategoryGW Systems SSurvey CostAnnual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *State LaborRateD E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E<25-500 15,03812525.50$ 0% -0 -$501-1K 1,659241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$1,001-2.5K 685241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$2,501-3.3K 79241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$3,301-4.1K 46361,576.51$ 0% -0 -$Total 17,507-0 -$Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 15 December 2011C. Transient Noncommunity SystemsGW TNCWSs GW TNC TotalSize Inventory of Unit Burden for Unit Labor Systems w Surveys Annual AnnualCategoryGW Systems SSurvey CostAnnual % Sys Burden CostA(from "Inventoryof Systems withViolations")B C = B *State LaborRateD E = A * D F = B * E G = C * E<25-500 78,59512525.50$ 0% -0 -$501-1K 1,965241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$1,001-2.5K 522241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$2,501-3.3K 46241,051.01$ 0% -0 -$3,301-4.1K 23361,576.51$ 0% -0 -$Total 81,151-0 -$Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.D. TotalsTotal Total TotalSize Annual Annual AnnualCategoryBurden Cost ResponsesH IJ<25-500 --$ -501-1K --$ -1,001-2.5K --$ -2,501-3.3K --$ -3,301-4.1K --$ -Total --$ -Note: Burden for sanitary surveys is now accounted for under the Ground Water Rule.Sanitary Surveys - Burden and Cost (Continued)Microbial Rules ICR - TCR C - 16 December 2011Exhibit C.12Total Coliform Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden EstimatesNo changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.Microbial Rules ICR - Total Coliform Rule C - 17 December 2011

# Appendix D

Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment

Rule Spreadsheets

# Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 1,376 3,781,232 4,276,458 138,488,817 $ 16,938,278 $ 15,822,633 $

Exception Reports and

Individual Filter

Assessments (IFAs) 165 165 4,127 133,656 $ - $ - $

Totals 1,376 3,781,397 4,280,585 138,622,473 $ 16,938,278 $ 15,822,633 $

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M

Cost Annual Capital Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 57 66,035 445,739 19,519,815 $ - $ - $

Exception Reports and

Comprehensive

Performance Evaluations

(CPEs) 57 151 7,154 313,281 $ - $ - $

Sanitary Surveys 57 4,432 495,015 21,677,693 $ - $ - $

Total 57 70,619 947,908 41,510,789 $ - $ - $ 

# Exhibit D.1a - IESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary

Exhibit D.1b - IESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 1 December 2011

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC

A B C D E F G=A-D H=B-E I=C-F

< 100 987 257 1,345 416 121 631 1

- 3 415 121 628

101-500 2,150 264 500 644 150 376 4

- - 640 150 376

501-1,000 1,171 86 86 348 50 63 2

- - 346 50 63

1,001-3,300 2,521 75 63 948 34 50 1

- - 947 34 50

3,301-10K 2,149 29 24 1,011 7 17

- - - 1,011 7 17

10,001-50K 1,920 6 2 975 1

- 5

- - 970 1

- 50,001-100K 393 1

- 225

- - 1

- - 224

- - 100,001-1M 325 1

- 237

- - - - - 237

- -

>1M 18 0 1 17 0 - 1

- - 16

- -

Total 11,635 719 2,021 4,822 363 1,138 15

- 3 4,807 363 1,135

Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010. Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size

category. 

# Exhibit D.2 - IESWTR System Inventory

Population

Category Filtered Non-Purchased Surface

Water/GWUDI Unfiltered Surface

Water/GWUDI Surface Water

and GWUDI Non-Purchased Surface

Water/GWUDI



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 2 December 2011

# CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC

A B C D E F G=A*D H=B*E I=C*F J K L M=G*J N=H*K O=I*L

< 100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 601 1

- 93.9% 93.9% 93.9% 565 1

- 1.08 1.00 1.00 610 1

-

25,001-50K 369

- - 93.9% 93.9% 93.9% 347

- - 1.08 1.00 1.00 375

- -

50,001-75K 141

- - 98.5% 98.5% 98.5% 139

- - 1.35 1.00 1.00 187

- -

75,001-100K 83

- - 98.5% 98.5% 98.5% 82

- - 1.35 1.00 1.00 110

- -

100,001-500K 210

- - 96.0% 96.0% 96.0% 202

- - 1.69 1.00 1.00 340

- -

500,001-1M 27

- - 96.0% 96.0% 96.0% 26

- - 1.69 1.00 1.00 44

- -

>1M 16

- - 96.0% 96.0% 96.0% 15

- - 1.69 1.00 1.00 26

- -

Total 1,447 1

- 1,375 1

- 1,692 1

- 

# Exhibit D.3 - Systems and Plants Subject to IESWTR Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Requirements

(Practicing Conventional or Direct Filtration)

Source: Number of plants per system (for CWSs) and percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration are from 2006 C WSS. 

# Total Plants Subject to

IESWTR Individual Filter

Turbidity Monitoring Plants Per System Population

Category % Using Conventional or

Direct Filtration Total Systems Subject to

IESWTR Individual Filter

Turbidity Monitoring Filtered Non-Purchased

Surface Water/GWUDI

Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Percent age of plants using conventional or direct filtration was

assumed to apply to NTNCWSs and TNCWSs. Percentage of systems using conventional or direct filtration was not available. Percen tage of plants was used as a proxy.



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 3 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNCDataCollectionUnit Burden(hours)Data CollectionAnnual Burden(hours)Data ReviewUnit Burden(hours)Data ReviewAnnualBurden(hours)DataReporting UnitBurden(hours)Data ReportingAnnual Burden(hours)Recordkeeping UnitBurden(hours)Recordkeeping AnnualBurden(hours)Data ReviewUnit Burden(hours)Data ReviewAnnualBurden(hours)DevelopSummaryReport UnitBurden(hours)DevelopSummaryReport AnnualBurden (hours)A B C D EFG HI=H*365days/yr*3 times/day JK=J*365days/yr*3 times/day L M=L*12 N O=N*12 P Q=P*12 R S=R*12T=[(E+F+G)*(I+K+M+O)]+[(A+B+C)*(Q+S)]U=T*A<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A10,001-25K 32.38$ 5651-6101-11,09511,095101205608968961,557,09550,424,968$25,001-50K 32.38$ 347--375--11,09511,09510120560896896954,54230,911,901$50,001-75K 32.38$ 139--187--11,09511,09510120560896896470,57115,238,978$75,001-100K 32.38$ 82--110--11,09511,09510120560896896277,0038,970,462$100,001-500K 32.38$ 202--340--11,09511,09510120560896896844,35527,343,584$500,001-1M 32.38$ 26--44--11,09511,09510120560896896108,5603,515,604$>1M 32.38$ 15--26--11,09511,0951012056089689664,3322,083,321$Total 1,3751-1,6921-4,276,458138,488,817$Sources:(H, J, L, N, P, R) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(M, O, Q, S) These activities occur monthly.(H, J) These activities occur three times per day on a daily basis.System Level Labor HoursNumber of Conventional andDirect Filtration Systems (SWand GWUDI)Note:IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.Exhibit D.4 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - PWSsPopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateTotal AnnualBurden (hours)Total AnnualLabor CostNumber of Conventionaland Direct FiltrationPlants(SW and GWUDI)Plant Level BurdenMicrobial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 4 December 2011

# CWS NTNC TNC Avg Flow Design Flow

A BC D E F G=(A+B+C)*D*F

*(1,000 kgal/Mgal)

*(1 dollar/100 cents)

*(365 days/yr) H I=[(A+B+C)*E*H

*(1,000 kgal/Mgal)

*(1 dollar/100 cents)

*(365 days/yr)]/

7 years

<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 565 1

- 4 8 0.377 2,781,487 $ 1.295 3,174,083 $

25,001-50K 347

- - 4 9 0.317 1,716,892 $ 1.088 1,748,699 $

50,001-75K 139

- - 8 20 0.320 1,325,451 $ 0.927 1,356,655 $

75,001-100K 82

- - 14 33 0.316 1,343,908 $ 0.837 1,177,442 $

100,001-500K 202

- - 27 60 0.322 6,509,500 $ 0.805 5,048,585 $

500,001-1M 26

- - 78 164 0.150 1,111,029 $ 0.771 1,705,738 $

>1M 15

- - 299 594 0.128 2,150,010 $ 0.338 1,611,432 $

Total 1,375 1

- 16,938,278 $ 15,822,633 $

Sources:

(D, E) Average and design flow information is from the 2006 CWSS. This data includes both surface water and groundwater sources , and thus potentially over estimate daily flows.

(F, H) IESWTR RIA (1998), Appendix C. Updated to 2010$.

(I) Assumes turbidimeters are replaced once every 7 years. Note:

IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Capital Unit Costs for

Continuous Monitoring

(cents per thousand

gallons) Number of Conventional

and Direct Filtration

Systems

(SW and GWUDI) 

# Exhibit D.5 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs - PWSs

Annual O&M Costs for Continuous

Monitoring (dollars/yr) Annual Capital Costs for

Continuous Monitoring 

# Population

Category O&M Unit Costs for

Continuous Monitoring

(cents per thousand

gallons) Flows

(Millions of Gallons per Day)



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 5 December 2011

# CWS NTNC TNC Exception

Reports IFAs Exception

Reports IFAs Exception

Reports IFAs

A B C D E F G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F I J K=(G*I)+(J*H) L=K*A

<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 32.38 $ 565 1

- 10% 2% 57 11 20 50 1,697 54,943 $

25,001-50K 32.38 $ 347

- - 10% 2% 35 7 20 50 1,040 33,678 $

50,001-75K 32.38 $ 139

- - 10% 2% 14 3 20 50 417 13,492 $

75,001-100K 32.38 $ 82

- - 10% 2% 8 2 20 50 245 7,942 $

100,001-500K 32.38 $ 202

- - 10% 2% 20 4 20 50 605 19,589 $

500,001-1M 32.38 $ 26

- - 10% 2% 3 1 20 50 78 2,519 $

>1M 32.38 $ 15

- - 10% 2% 2 0 20 50 46 1,493 $

Total 1,375 1

- 138 28 4,127 133,656 $

Notes:

(E) Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individu al filters (absent such exceedances,

systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000

people.

(F) Individual filter assessments are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 1 NTU during 3 consecutive months. IESWT R individual filter turbidity monitoring

requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.

(I, J) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. Labor Hours/Report Number of Conventional

and Direct Filtration

Systems

(SW and GWUDI) 

# Annual Number of Systems

Performing Each Activity 

# Exhibit D.6 - Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden and Costs - PWSs

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Annual

Burden Total Annual

Labor Cost 

# Percent of Systems

Performing Each Year



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 6 December 2011CWS NTNC TNCComplianceTracking UnitBurden (hours)ComplianceTracking AnnualBurden (hours)Analyze/ReviewData Unit Burden(hours)Analyze/ReviewData AnnualBurden (hours)DeterminationsUnit Burden(hours)Make DeterminationsAnnual Burden (AsRequired) (hours)RecordkeepingUnit Burden(hours)RecordkeepingAnnual Burden(hours)A B C D E F=E*12 G H=G*12 I J=I*12 K L=K*12M=(B+C+D)*(F+H+J+L) N=M*A<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A10,001-25K 43.79$ 5651-8969108896224183,2358,024,218$25,001-50K 43.79$ 347--8969108896224112,3154,918,499$50,001-75K 43.79$ 139--896910889622444,9951,970,443$75,001-100K 43.79$ 82--896910889622426,4871,159,906$100,001-500K 43.79$ 202--896910889622465,3302,860,938$500,001-1M 43.79$ 26--89691088962248,400367,835$>1M 43.79$ 15--89691088962244,978217,976$Total 1,3751-445,73919,519,815$Notes:(E, G, I, K) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives(including states).(F, H, J, L) These activities occur monthly.Exhibit D.7 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - StatesPopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateTotalAnnualBurden(hours)Total AnnualLabor CostNumber of Conventional andDirect Filtration Systems(SW and GWUDI)State Level Labor Hours/SystemMicrobial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 7 December 2011

# CWS NTNC TNC Exception

Reports CPEs Exception

Reports CPEs Exception

Reports CPEs

A B C D E F G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F I J K=(G*I)+(J*H) L=K*A

<100 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

101-500 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

501-1,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1,001-3,300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

3,301-10K N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10,001-25K 43.79 $ 565 1

- 10% 1% 57 6 36 160 2,941 128,784 $

25,001-50K 43.79 $ 347

- - 10% 1% 35 3 36 160 1,803 78,939 $

50,001-75K 43.79 $ 139

- - 10% 1% 14 1 36 160 722 31,624 $

75,001-100K 43.79 $ 82

- - 10% 1% 8 1 36 160 425 18,616 $

100,001-500K 43.79 $ 202

- - 10% 1% 20 2 36 160 1,049 45,916 $

500,001-1M 43.79 $ 26

- - 10% 1% 3 0 36 160 135 5,904 $

>1M 43.79 $ 15

- - 10% 1% 2 0 36 160 80 3,498 $

Total 1,375 1

- 138 14 7,154 313,281 $

Source:

(E, F) IESWTR ICR (1998) Notes:

(E) Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individu al filters (absent such exceedances, systems

need only report that they have completed monitoring).

(F) Comprehensive performance evaluations are performed by states when a system exceeds 2 NTU in two consecutive measurements i n an individual filter in each of two

consecutive months.

(I, J) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (inclu ding states). Unit Burden Number of Conventional

and Direct Filtration

Systems

(SW and GWUDI) 

# Annual Number of Systems

Requiring Activity 

# Exhibit D.8 - Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden and Costs - States

Population

Category Hourly

Labor

Rate Total Annual

Burden Total Annual

Labor Cost 

# Percent of Systems

Requiring Activity Each

Year



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 8 December 2011CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS All NCWSs Filtered SystemsUnfilteredSystemsFilteredSystemsUnfilteredSystemsA B C D E F G H I J=(B*H)+((C+D)*I) K=(E*H)+((F+G)*I) L M N=(L*J)+(M*K) O=N*A<100 43.79$ 9872571,3451-333.3% 20.0% 6490.9161610,405 455,637$101-500 43.79$ 2,1502645004--33.3% 20.0% 8691.3161613,932 610,126$501-1,000 43.79$ 1,17186862--33.3% 20.0% 4250.7282811,915 521,785$1,001-3,300 43.79$ 2,52175631--33.3% 20.0% 8680.3282824,315 1,064,820$3,301-4,400 43.79$ 47565---33.3% 20.0% 161-40406,427 281,468$4,401-10K 43.79$ 1,6742319---33.3% 20.0% 566-654036,816 1,612,232$10,001-25K 43.79$ 1,204413--33.3% 20.0% 4021.0654026,190 1,146,922$25,001-50K 43.79$ 716212--33.3% 20.0% 2390.639119493,693 4,103,025$50,001-75K 43.79$ 2651-1--33.3% 20.0% 890.270533462,510 2,737,436$75,001-100K 43.79$ 1280-0--33.3% 20.0% 430.11,03448544,142 1,933,080$100,001-500K 43.79$ 2901----33.3% 20.0% 97-1,364638131,903 5,776,303$500,001-1M 43.79$ 350----33.3% 20.0% 12-1,68978619,981 875,012$>1M 43.79$ 180 11--33.3% 20.0% 60.32,0081,00412,784 559,849$Total 11,6357192,02115-34,4265.6495,015 21,677,693$Percent of SurveysPerformed Annually Total Surveys AnnuallySource:(H, I) Percentage of systems undergoing surveys annually is based on IESWTR requirements. Community water systems must undergoa sanitary survey at least every 3 years and non-community water systems musundergo a sanitary survey at least every 5 years.Note:All SW/GWUDI systems must undergo surveys (other requirements of the IESWTR are assumed to apply to non-purchased SW/GWUDI systems).(L, M) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (including states).Exhibit D.9 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and CostsPopulationCategoryHourlyLaborRateTotal LaborHours/YearTotal LaborCost/YearSanitary Survey UnitBurden (hours)Number Filtered Systems(SW and GWUDI)Number of UnfilteredSystems (SW andGWUDI)Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 9 December 2011

# Exhibit D.10

Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original

and Revised Burden Estimates

No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.



# Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR D - 10 December 2011

# Appendix E

Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule Spreadsheets

# Exhibit E1

LT1ESWTR Burden and Cost Summary by Activity

Exhibit E1a

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M Cost Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 2,770 321,373 128,860 4,173,012 $ 2,894,136 $ 2,265,732 $ 9,332,880 $

Turbidity Exceptions

Reporting 499 499 3,990 129,204 $ - $ - $ 129,204 $

Individual Filter

Assessments 111 111 5,541 179,450 $ - $ - $ 179,450 $

Total 2,770 321,982 138,391 4,481,665 $ 2,894,136 $ 2,265,732 $ 9,641,533 $



# Exhibit E1b

Requirement Annual

Respondents Avg. Annual

Responses Annual

Burden Annual Burden

(Labor) Cost Annual O&M Cost Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Cost

Turbidity Monitoring 57 66,491 99,736 4,367,656 $ - $ - $ 4,367,656 $

Turbidity Exceptions

Reporting 57 554 19,501 853,971 $ - $ - $ 853,971 $

Total 57 67,045 119,237 5,221,626 $ - $ - $ 5,221,626 $ 

# LT1ESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary

LT1ESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 1 December 2011

# Exhibit E2

Summary of the LT1 Burden, Respondents, Responses, and

Costs for the ICR Approval Period by Year and Annual Averages

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual Averag e Three Year Total

Burden (hours) F5.4 138,391 138,391 138,391 138,391 415,174

Respondents (number) [2] F7 2,770 2,770 2,770 2,770 2,770

Responses (number) F8 321,982 321,982 321,982 321,982 965,947

Costs (labor) F3.4 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 13,444,995 $

Costs (Turbidimeter Capital) F3.4 2,265,732 $ 2,265,732 $ 2,265,732 $ 2,265,732 $ 6,797,196 $

Costs (Turbidimeter O&M) F3.4 2,894,136 $ 2,894,136 $ 2,894,136 $ 2,894,136 $ 8,682,408 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# States

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual Averag e Three Year Total

Burden (hours) E6 119,237 119,237 119,237 119,237 357,711

Respondents (number)** E7 57 57 57 57 57

Responses (number) E8 67,045 67,045 67,045 67,045 201,135

Costs E4 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 15,664,879 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

Annual Average Three Year Total

Total Burden (hours) 257,628 772,885

Total Respondents (number) 2,827 2,827

Total Cost for All Activitie s 14,863,160 $ 44,589,479 $



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 2 December 2011

# Exhibit E3.1

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer

PWS Labo r

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Averag e

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E10.1a 1,492,337 $ 1,492,337 $ 1,492,337 $ 1,492,337 $

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.1b 51,991 $ 51,991 $ 51,991 $ 51,991 $

Individual Filter Assessments E10.1b 72,209 $ 72,209 $ 72,209 $ 72,209 $

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $

Yearly Labor Total 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $ 1,616,536 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit) [3] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Averag e

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost* [2] E10.1c 554,633 $ 554,633 $ 554,633 $ 554,633 $

Turbidimeter Annual O&M * [3] E10.1c 1,164,729 $ 1,164,729 $ 1,164,729 $ 1,164,729 $

Yearly Total 1,719,361 $ 1,719,361 $ 1,719,361 $ 1,719,361 $

[2] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.

[3] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 3 December 2011

# Exhibit E3.2

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving between 1,001 and 3,300 People

PWS Labor

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E10.2a 1,180,342 $ 1,180,342 $ 1,180,342 $ 1,180,342 $

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.2b 33,996 $ 33,996 $ 33,996 $ 33,996 $

Individual Filter Assessments E10.2b 47,217 $ 47,217 $ 47,217 $ 47,217 $

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $

Y early Labor Total 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $ 1,261,555 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost [1] E10.2c 613,193 $ 613,193 $ 613,193 $ 613,193 $

Turbidimeter Annual O&M [2] E10.2c 761,484 $ 761,484 $ 761,484 $ 761,484 $

Yearly Total 1,374,677 $ 1,374,677 $ 1,374,677 $ 1,374,677 $

[1] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.

[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 4 December 2011

# Exhibit E3.3

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for Systems Serving between 3,301 and 10,000 People

PWS Labo r

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Averag e

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.3a 1,500,333 $ 1,500,333 $ 1,500,333 $ 1,500,333 $

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.3b 43,217 $ 43,217 $ 43,217 $ 43,217 $

Individual Filter Assessments E10.3b 60,024 $ 60,024 $ 60,024 $ 60,024 $

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $

Yearly Labor Total 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $ 1,603,574 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS Capital and O&M

Source

(Exhibit) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Averag e

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost [1] E10.3c 1,097,906 $ 1,097,906 $ 1,097,906 $ 1,097,906 $

Turbidimeter Annual O&M [2] E10.3c 967,923 $ 967,923 $ 967,923 $ 967,923 $

Yearly Total 2,065,829 $ 2,065,829 $ 2,065,829 $ 2,065,829 $

[1] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.

[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 5 December 2011

# Exhibit E3.4

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year

for All System Sizes

PWS Labor

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E3.1-E3.3 4,173,012 $ 4,173,012 $ 4,173,012 $ 4,173,012 $ 12,519,035 $

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E3.1-E3.3 129,204 $ 129,204 $ 129,204 $ 129,204 $ 387,611 $

Individual Filter Assessments E3.1-E3.3 179,450 $ 179,450 $ 179,450 $ 179,450 $ 538,349 $

Annual Activity Yearly Total 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 13,444,995 $

Yearly Labor Total 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 4,481,665 $ 13,444,995 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# PWS C ap i ta l an d O&M

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual

Turbidimeter Capital Cost E3.1-E3.3 $2,265,732 $2,265,732 $2,265,732 $2,265,732 $6,797,196

Turbidimeter Annual O&M E3.1-E3.3 $2,894,136 $2,894,136 $2,894,136 $2,894,136 $8,682,408

Yearly Total $5,159,868 $5,159,868 $5,159,868 $5,159,868 $15,479,604

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 6 December 2011

# Exhibit E4

Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year for States

Summary Cost Estimates for States and Systems

States

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activities

Turbidity Monitoring E12a 4,367,656 $ 4,367,656 $ 4,367,656 $ 4,367,656 $ 13,102,968 $

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E12b 853,971 $ 853,971 $ 853,971 $ 853,971 $ 2,561,912 $

Annual Activity Yearly Tota l 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 15,664,879 $

Yearly Total 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 15,664,879 $

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Summary of Total Year by Year Costs for PWSs and States [1]

Source

(Exhibit) [2] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual Average 3 Year Total

System Size Category

PWSs Serving < 1,000 People E3.1 3,335,898 $ 3,335,898 $ 3,335,898 $ 3,335,898 $ 10,007,693 $

PWSs Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People E3.2 2,636,232 $ 2,636,232 $ 2,636,232 $ 2,636,232 $ 7,908,697 $

PWSs Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People E3.3 3,669,403 $ 3,669,403 $ 3,669,403 $ 3,669,403 $ 11,008,210 $

PWS Total 9,641,533 $ 9,641,533 $ 9,641,533 $ 9,641,533 $ 28,924,599 $

States and Territories E4 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 15,664,879 $

Yearly Total 14,863,160 $ 14,863,160 $ 14,863,160 $ 14,863,160 $ 44,589,479 $

[1] Include Capital and O&M costs.

[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 7 December 2011

# Exhibit E5.1

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer

PWSs Labo r

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

A verag e

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.1a 46,083 46,083 46,083 46,083

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.1b 1,605 1,605 1,605 1,605

Individual Filter Assessment E10.1b 2,230 2,230 2,230 2,230

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l 49,918 49,918 49,918 49,918

Yearly Labor Total 49,918 49,918 49,918 49,918

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 8 December 2011

# Exhibit E5.2

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving between 1,001 and 3,300 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.2a 36,448 36,448 36,448 36,448

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.2b 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050

Individual Filter Assessment E10.2b 1,458 1,458 1,458 1,458

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Tota l 38,956 38,956 38,956 38,956

Y early Labor Total 38,956 38,956 38,956 38,956

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 9 December 2011

# Exhibit E5.3

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for Systems Serving between 3,301 and 10,000 People

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E10.3a 46,329 46,329 46,329 46,329

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E10.3b 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335

Individual Filter Assessment E10.3b 1,854 1,854 1,854 1,854

Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total 49,517 49,517 49,517 49,517

Yearly Total 49,517 49,517 49,517 49,517

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 10 December 2011

# Exhibit E5.4

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

for All System Sizes

PWSs

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E5.1-E5.3 128,860 128,860 128,860 128,860 386,581

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E5.1-E5.3 3,990 3,990 3,990 3,990 11,969

Individual Filter Monitoring E5.1-E5.3 5,541 5,541 5,541 5,541 16,624

Annual Activity Yearly Tota 138,391 138,391 138,391 138,391 415,174

Yearly Tota l 138,391 138,391 138,391 138,391 415,174

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 11 December 2011

# Exhibit E6

Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity for States

Summary Burden for States and Systems

States

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring E12a 99,736 99,736 99,736 99,736 299,209

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting E12b 19,501 19,501 19,501 19,501 58,502

Annual Activity Yearly Tota 119,237 119,237 119,237 119,237 357,711

Yearly Tota l 119,237 119,237 119,237 119,237 357,711



# Summary of Total Year by Year Burden for PWSs and State s

Source

(Exhibit) [1] Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average 3 Year Total

System Size Categor y

PWSs Serving < 1,000 People E5.1 49,918 49,918 49,918 49,918 149,753

PWSs Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People E5.2 38,956 38,956 38,956 38,956 116,868

PWSs Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People E5.3 49,517 49,517 49,517 49,517 148,552

PWS Total 138,391 138,391 138,391 138,391 415,174

States and Territories E6 119,237 119,237 119,237 119,237 357,711

Yearly Tota l 257,628 257,628 257,628 257,628 772,885

[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 12 December 2011

# Exhibit E7

Respondents for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

PWSs [1]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Respondents 2,770 2,770 2,770 2,770

Includes systems performing:

Annual Turbidity Monitoring 2,770 2,770 2,770 2,770

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 499 499 499 499

Individual Filter Assesmen t 111 111 111 111



# States [2]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

Respondents 57 57 57 57

Includes States performing:

Annual Turbidity Monitoring 57 57 57 57

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 57 57 57 57

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation 57 57 57 57



# Sum for PWSs and States

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual

Average

PWSs 2,770 2,770 2,770 2,770

States and Territories 57 57 57 57

Y early Total 2,827 2,827 2,827 2,827

[2] Each state is one respondent. [1] Each PWS is one respondent. One respondent may be involved in more than one activity; however, in

order to avoid double-counting, the maximum number of respondents expected to be involved in the rule

activities annually is assumed to be the number of respondents for that year.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 13 December 2011

# Exhibit E8

Responses for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity

PWSs [1]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring 321,373 321,373 321,373 321,373

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 499 499 499 499

Individual Filter Assessments 111 111 111 111

Yearly Total 321,982 321,982 321,982 321,982



# States [2]

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual

Average

Annual Activitie s

Turbidity Monitoring 66,491 66,491 66,491 66,491

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting 499 499 499 499

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation 55 55 55 55

Yearly Total 67,045 67,045 67,045 67,045



# Sum for PWSs and States

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 A nnual

Average

PWSs 321,982 321,982 321,982 321,982

States and Territories 67,045 67,045 67,045 67,045

Yearly Total 389,027 389,027 389,027 389,027

* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.

[1] Each PWS is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E3-E5 is a response.

[2] Each state is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E3-E5 is a response.

Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 14 December 2011

# Exhibit E9

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities

for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer

Disinfection Benchmark Labor for Systems Serving 1,000 or Less (Filtered & Unfiltered Systems )

Systems

(Respondents) Unit Burden Unit Cost Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Initial

Cost

Activit y A B C A *B A*C

Submit Profiling Notification to State 0 1.0 32 $ -

- $

Data Entry and Spreadsheet Development 0 8.7 281 $ -

- $

Data Review 0 4.3 140 $ -

- $

Generate Report for State and In-House Review 0 40.0 1,295 $ -

- $

Meet and Review with State 0 8.0 259 $ -

- $

Supplemental Viral Profile and Benchmar k 0 53.0 1,716 $ -

- $

Totals 115.0 3,724 $ -

- $

Total Cost

Total Costs for All Start-Up Activitie s

- $

Notes:

Baseline number systems performing rule activities from all filtered systems. Percentages requiring report and viral benchmark

from original LT1ESTWTR analysis.

Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 15 December 2011

# Exhibit E10.1

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer

Exhibit E10.1a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)

Systems

(Respondents) [1] Frequency Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Activity A B C D A*B*C A*B*D

Data Analysis 1,115 52 0.17 $5 9,662 $312,909

Data Review 1,115 52 0.17 $5 9,662 $312,909

Record Keeping 1,115 12 2.00 $65 26,758 $866,518

$76 46,083 $1,492,337



# Exhibit E10.1b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems

Systems

(Respondents) [1] Frequency Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Activity A B C D A*B*C A*B*D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 201 1 8.0 $259 1,605 $51,991

A nnual IFA 45 1 50.0 $1,619 2,230 $72,209

Total $1,878 3,835 $124,200

Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Total for All PWS Labor Burdens and Costs 49,918 $1,616,536



# Exhibit E10.1c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance

Activities Systems Unit Cost Total Cost Annual Cost [3]

Turbidimeter Installation [3] 1,115 $3,482 $3,882,428 $554,633

Operation and Maintenance 1,115 $1,045 $1,164,729 $1,164,729

Total $5,047,157 $1,719,361

Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Total for All PWS Activities 49,918 $3,335,898

[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment. [2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. [1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage performing

exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 16 December 2011

# Exhibit E10.2

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People

Exhibit E10.2a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)

Systems

(Respondents) [1] Frequency Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Activit y A B CD A *B* C A *B* D

Data Analysis 729 52 0.250 8 $ 9,477 306,889 $

Data Review 729 52 0.250 8 $ 9,477 306,889 $

Record Keeping 729 12 2.0 65 $ 17,495 566,564 $

Totals 81 $ 36,448 1,180,342 $



# Exhibit E10.2b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for System s

Systems

(Respondents) [1] Frequency Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cost

Activit y A B CD A *B* C A *B* D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 131 1 8.0 259 $ 1,050 33,996 $

Annual IF A 29 1 50.0 1,619 $ 1,458 47,217 $

Total 1,878 $ 2,508 81,213 $

A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Total for All PWS Activities 38,956 1,261,55 5 $



# Exhibit E10.2c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance

Activity Systems Unit Cost Total Cost Annual Cost [3]

Turbidimeter Installation [3] 729 5,888 $ 4,292,351 $ 613,193 $

Operation and Maintenanc e 729 1,045 $ 761,484 $ 761,484 $

Total 5,053,836 $ 1,374,677 $

A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Total for All PWS Activities 38,956 2,636,232 $

[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment. [1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage performing

exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.

[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 17 December 2011

# Exhibit E10.3

PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

by Systems Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People

Exhibit E10.3a

Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)

Systems

(Respondents) [1] Frequenc y Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Activit y A B CD A *B*C A *B*D

Data Analysis 927 52 0.250 8 $ 12,046 390,087 $

Data Review 927 52 0.250 8 $ 12,046 390,087 $

Record Keepin g 927 12 2.0 65 $ 22,238 720,16 0 $

Totals 81 $ 46,329 1,500,33 3 $



# Exhibit E10.3b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for System s

Systems

(Respondents) Frequency

per Yea r Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Activit y A B CD A *B*C A *B*D

Annual Reporting Exceptions 167 1 8.0 259 $ 1335 43,217 $

A nnual IF A 37 1 50.0 1,619 $ 1854 60,024 $

Total 1,878 $ 3,188 103,241 $

A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Total Labor Burdens and Costs 49,517 1,603,57 4 $



# Exhibit E10.3c

Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance

Activit y Systems Unit Cost Total Cost Annual Cost [3]

Turbidimeter Installation [3] 927 8,294 $ 7,685,345 $ 1,097,906 $

Operation and Maintenanc e 927 1,045 $ 967,92 3 $ 967,92 3 $

Total 8,653,26 8 $ 2,065,82 9 $

A nnual Burden (hrs.) Annual Cos t

Total for All PWS Activitie s 49,517 3,669,40 3 $

[1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWS and NTNCWS from system baseline. Percentage p erforming

exceptions reporting and IFA is from the LT1ESWTR EA.

[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.

[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 18 December 2011

# Exhibit E11

State Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities by Activity

Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking Labor

Responses Hours per

Task Cost per

Task Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Initial

Cost ($)

Activit y A B C A* B A * C

Compliance Tracking [1] - 4.0 175.17 $ -

- $

Analyze and Review Profiling Data - 8.0 350.34 $ -

- $

Make Determinations - 8.0 350.34 $ -

- $

Meet and Review with PWSs - 16.0 700.67 $ -

- $

Review Viral Benchmark - 16.0 700.67 $ -

- $

Recordkeeping - 4.0 175.17 $ -

- $

Total 56.0 2,452.35 $ -

- $

Total Burden

(hrs.) Total Cost

($)

Total for All Start-Up Activitie s

- - $

[1] Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations

with PWSs. Profiling and benchmarking were completed during previous ICR periods.

Note:

Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 19 December 2011

# Exhibit E12

State Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities

Exhibit E12a

Turbidity Monitoring

Responses Frequency

per Year Unit Burden

(hrs.) [2] Cost per Task Total Burden

(hrs.) Cost ($)

Activity A B C D A*B*C A*B*D

Compliance Tracking 2,770 12 1.0 44 $ 33,245 1,455,885 $

Recordkeeping 2,770 12 2.0 88 $ 66,491 2,911,771 $

Total 99,736 4,367,656 $



# Exhibit E12b

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting

Responses Frequency

per Year Unit Burden

(hrs.) [2] Cost per Task Total Burden

(hrs.) Cost ($)

Activity A B C D A*B*C A*B*D

Annual Exceptions Reports 499 1 3.5 153 $ 1,746 76,439 $

Annual CPE (serving 1,000 or less) [1] 26 1 400.0 17,517 $ 10,405 455,674 $

A nnual CPE (serving 1,001 - 10,000) [1] 29 1 250.0 10,948 $ 7,350 321,857 $

Total 19,501 853,971 $

[1] Number of systems requiring CPE calculated using percentage from LT1ESTWR 2004 ICR.



# [2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (includin g states).



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 20 December 2011

# Exhibit E13

Summary of Annual Costs

Annual Activitie s

Source

Exhibit Total Annual

Cost

PWS Cost Estimates for Annual Activities

E3.4 4,173,012 $

E3.4 308,653 $

E3.4 2,265,732 $

E3.4 2,894,136 $

Subtotal 9,641,533 $

State Cost Estimates for Annual Activities

E4 4,367,656 $

E4 853,971 $

Subtotal 5,221,626 $

Total Cost Estimates for Annual Activities 14,863,160 $ Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and CPEs Turbidity Monitoring

Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and IFAs

Turbidimeter Capital Cost

Turbidimeter O&M Cost

Turbidity Monitoring

Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 21 December 2011

# Exhibit E14

Occupational Cost and Burden per Start-up Activity

Activity [1] Hours [2] Labor Rate Total Cost

States

Profiling and Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking 56.0 43.79 $ 2,452 $

[1] The activities listed in the first column correspond to Exhibit E11.

[2] Sum of hours devoted to each task listed in Exhibit E11. Total Burden

Note:

Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.

Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 22 December 2011

# Exhibit E15

Occupational Cost and Burden per Activity per Year

Activity [1] Hours [2] Labor Rate [3] Cost

PWSs Serving 0-500

Turbidity Monitoring 41.3 32.38 $ 1,339 $

Exception Reporting 8.0 32.38 $ 259 $

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

PWSs Serving 501-1,000

Turbidity Monitoring 41.3 32.38 $ 1,339 $

Exception Reporting 8.0 32.38 $ 259 $

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

PWSs Serving 1,001-3,300

Turbidity Monitoring 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

Exception Reporting 8.0 32.38 $ 259 $

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

PWSs Serving 3,301-10,000

Turbidity Monitoring 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

Exception Reporting 8.0 32.38 $ 259 $

Individual Filter Assessment 50.0 32.38 $ 1,619 $

States

Turbidity Monitoring State 36.0 43.79 $ 1,577 $

Exceptions Reporting [4] 403.5 43.79 $ 17,670 $

[2] Hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each of the line items listed

in tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3, multiplied by the frequency of the

activity. Total Burden

[1] Activities correspond to Tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3.

[4] Exceptions reporting for states includes CPEs, which are assumed to take 400

hours for a system serving < 1000 and 250 hours for a system serving 1,001-10,000. [3] PWS labor rates are National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,

United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water and Liquid

Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May

2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm. State labor rates are National

Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 19-

2041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including

Health". May 2010 data (published in May 2011).

http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm.

Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 23 December 2011

# Exhibit E16

LT1 Universe of Respondents Performing

Information Collection and Record Keeping Activities

S y stem T y pes

Community 2,171 2,171

Transient Non-Community 435 435

Non-Transient Non-Community 164 164

Total 2,770 2,770

Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010. Three Year

Total Turbidity

Monitoring

Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 24 December 2011Exhibit E17Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15Start date:Jan. 2002-Dec. 2002Jan. 2003-Dec. 2003Jan. 2004-Dec. 2004Jan. 2005-Dec. 2005Jan. 2006-Dec. 2006Jan. 2007-Dec. 2007Jan. 2008-Dec. 2008Jan. 2009-Dec. 2009Jan. 2010-Dec. 2010Jan. 2011-Dec. 2011Jan. 2012-Dec. 2012Jan. 2013-Dec. 2013Jan. 2014-Dec. 2014Jan. 2015-Dec. 2015Jan. 2016-Dec. 2016ActivityTurbidity Monitoring Start-up - Systems17% 33% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turbidity Monitoring Annual - Systems 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - States 17% 33% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turbidity Monitoring Annual - States 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Turbidity Monitoring Capital 0% 20% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Turbidity Monitoring O&M 0% 20% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Benchmarking Start-up - Systems≤500 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Benchmarking Start-up - Systems 501-10,000 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Benchmarking Start-up - States 70% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Disinfection Profiling - Systems≤500 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Disinfection Profiling - Systems 501-10,000 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Disinfection Profiling - States 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Benchmarking - Systems≤500 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Benchmarking - Systems 501-10,000 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Benchmarking State - State 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Covered Finished Water* 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%* This rule activity is not associated with information collection or recordkeeping.LT1 Activity ScheduleMicrobial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 25 December 2011Exhibit E18SystemBaselineE.18a - Systems Serving≤100 to 10,000CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC CWS NTNC TNC<100987 257 1,345 416 121 631 1 0 3 415 121 628 22.6% 94 27 142101-500 2,150 264 500 644 150 376 4 0 0 640 150 376 58.1% 372 87 219501-1,000 1,171 86 86 348 50 63 2 0 0 346 50 63 37.7% 130 19 241,001-3,300 2,521 75 63 948 34 50 1 0 0 947 34 50 70.7% 670 24 353,301-10K 2,149 29 24 1,011 7 17 0 0 0 1,011 7 17 89.5% 905 6 15Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GWsystems within a given size category.Percent of plants that use conventional or direct filtration from 2006 CWSS surveyE.18b - Systems Serving≤1,000 to 10,000CWS NTNC TNC Total<1,000597 134 385 1,1151,001 - 3,300 670 24 35 7293,301 - 10,000 905 6 15 927Total 2,171 164 435 2,770Conventional or Direct SurfaceWater/GWUDIPopulation CategoryFiltered Non-PurchasedSurface Water/GWUDIPercent Conventionalor Direct FiltrationConventional or Direct SurfaceWater/GWUDI SystemsSource: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010. Number of unfiltered systems from 2006 CWSS.Population CategorySurface Waterand GWUDINon-Purchased SurfaceWater/GWUDIUnfiltered SurfaceWater/GWUDIMicrobial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 26 December 2011

# Exhibit E19

Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule -

Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates

No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.



# Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR E - 27 December 2011

# Appendix F

Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water

Treatment Rule SpreadsheetsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3Source May-12 May-13 May-14 Annual(Exhibit) April-13 April-14 April-15 Total AveragePWSsBurden (hours)F.2 21,97441,08666,057129,11743,039Respondents (number)F.3 1,3201,2481,3261,3261,231Responses (number)F.4 3,2107,08915,58025,8798,626Costs (dollars)F.5 711,607$ 1,330,535$ 3,994,869$ 6,037,012$ 2,012,337$Labor711,607$ 1,330,535$ 2,139,174$ 4,181,317$ 1,393,772$O&M-$ -$ 1,855,695$ 1,855,695$ 618,565$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent97.4Cost per respondent4,553$StatesBurden (hours)F.2 14,46427,21944,24185,92528,642Respondents (number)F.3 5757575757Responses (number)F.4 3,2567,13410,720920307Costs (dollars)F.5 633,420$ 1,191,964$ 1,937,423$ 3,762,807$ 1,254,269$Labor633,420$ 1,191,964$ 1,937,423$ 3,762,807$ 1,254,269$O & M-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent1,507.4Cost per respondent66,014$Total - PWS and StatesBurden (hours)F.2 36,43868,305110,298215,04171,680Respondents (number)F.3 1,3771,3051,3831,3831,288Responses (number)F.4 6,46614,22326,30046,98915,663Cost (dollars)F.5 1,345,027$ 2,522,500$ 5,932,292$ 9,799,818$ 3,266,606$Labor1,345,027$ 2,522,500$ 4,076,597$ 7,944,124$ 2,648,041$O & M-$ -$ 1,855,695$ 1,855,695$ 618,565$Capital-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Burden per respondent155.5Cost per respondent7,086$Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for May 1, 2012 - April 31, 2015.Exhibit F.1 Summary of Burden, Respondents, Responses, and Costs for the ICR Approval PeriodThe number of respondents is not added; rather the maximum number of respondents for the 3 years for a given activity is used toavoid double-counting.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-1 December 2011Exhibit F.2 Burden for the ICR Approval Period (Hours)Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Source May-12 May-13 May-14 Annual(Exhibit)April-13April-14April-15TotalAveragePWSsStart-up [1]F.7 -----Assessment for Binning [2]--E. coliMonitoringF.9 -----CryptosporidiumMonitoringF.10 -----Reporting F.11 -----UCFWR Reporting [3] F.13 -----Technology Reporting F.16 15,03334,63551,999101,66733,889Disinfection Benchmarking [4] F.17 6,9416,4515,34418,7366,245Assessment for Bin Reclassification [5]-E. coliMonitoringF.19 --2,8902,890963CryptosporidiumMonitoringF.20 --3,4903,4901,163Reporting F.21 --2,3342,334778PWSs - Total 21,97441,08666,057129,11743,039States and TerritoriesStart-up [6] F.8 -----Bin Determination and Reviewing MonitoringData [7]F.12 --6,1556,1552,052Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [8] F.14 -----Technology Reporting F.15 10,02223,09034,66667,77822,593Disinfection Benchmarking [9] F.18 4,4424,1293,42011,9913,997States and Territories - Total 14,46427,21944,24185,92528,642Total 36,43868,305110,298215,04171,680Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Sources:See Exhibit F.22 for breakdown of burden by year and system type.(5) Assessment for Bin Reclassification begins in Year 9 for systems serving 100,000 or more.(6) State rule start-up activities paralleled system activities.(7) Bin determination and monitoring review are assumed to parallel system monitoring and reporting activities.(9) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking activities will parallel system activities.Years listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.(1) Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Year 3.(3) Reporting requirements associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Year 3.(8) State activities related to uncovered finished water reservoirs parallel system activities.(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to occur before systems begin installing treatment.(2) InitialE.coli and Cryptosporidiummonitoring was completed by all systems by Year 6.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-2 December 2011Year 1Year 2Year 3Source May-12 May-13 May-14 Annual(Exhibit)April-13April-14April-15Total [11]AveragePWSsStart-up [1,2] F.7 -----Assessment for Binning [3, 4]E. coliMonitoring F.9 -----CryptosporidiumMonitoring F.10 -----Reporting F.11 -----UCFWR Reporting [5] F.13 -----Technology Reporting F.16 4479851,3261,326919Disinfection Benchmarking [6] F.17 1,3201,2481,1241,3201,231Assessment for Bin Reclassification--E. coliMonitoring F.19 --28828896CryptosporidiumMonitoring F.20 --28828896Reporting F.21 --288 28896PWSs - Total 1,3201,2481,3261,3261,231States and TerritoriesStart-up [7] F.8 -----Bin Determination and Reviewing MonitoringData [8]F.12 --575719Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [9] F.14 -----Technology Reporting F.15 5757575757Disinfection Benchmarking [10] F.18 5757575757States and Territories - Total 5757575757Total 1,3771,3051,3831,3831,288Notes:Detail may not add due to rounding.(3) Each plant is assumed to be a respondent.(7) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(8) Each State will be a respondent associated with reviewing monitoring data.(4) This activity was completed in the previous ICR period.(2) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.Exhibit F.3 Respondents for the ICR Approval Period(5) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(6) Systems are assumed to conduct disinfection profiling and benchmarking prior to installing treatment.(10) State activities for reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system activities for profiling and benchmarking.To avoid double-counting the number of respondents for assessment for binning and for State activities, the highest number of respondents for an activity foreach year is used for the total number of respondents.Years listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.(1) Each PWS is assumed to be a respondent.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-3 December 2011Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Source May-12 May-13 May-14 Annual(Exhibit)April-13April-14April-15 TotalAveragePWSsStart-up [1] F.7 -----Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring F.9 -----CryptosporidiumMonitoring F.10 -----Reporting F.11 -----UCFWR Reporting [3] F.13 -----Technology Reporting [4] F.16 2,9786,87610,33520,1906,730Disinfection Benchmarking [5] F.17 232212169613204Assessment for Bin Reclassification--E. coliMonitoring F.19 --2,3432,343781CryptosporidiumMonitoring F.20 --2,5382,538846Reporting [6] F.21 --19519565PWSs - Total 3,2107,08915,58025,8798,626States and TerritoriesStart-up [7] F.8 -----Bin Determination and Reviewing MonitoringData [8]F.12 --17117157Reviewing/approving UCFWR schedule [9] F.14 -----Technology Reporting F.15 2,9786,87610,335Disinfection Benchmarking [10] F.18 278258214749250States and Territories - Total 3,2567,13410,720920307Total 6,46614,22326,30026,7998,933NotesDetail may not add to totals due to rounding.Exhibit F.4 Responses for the ICR Approval PeriodYears listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(2) This activity was completed in the previous ICR period.(3) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(4) Systems are assumed to report monthly. This may be an overestimate, since reporting requirements vary with technology used.(5) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are considered 1 response. Profiling is assumed to be conducted prior to treatmentinstallation.(6) Two responses are associated with the second round of reporting: sampling plan and bin calculation.(7) State start-up activities are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(8) Each State will have 3 responses associated with binning and reviewing monitoring data (see Exhibit F.12). The number of responses from States andTerritories equals three times the number of small systems performing E. coli monitoring in a given year.(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(10) State reviews of disinfection benchmarks will parallel system activities. One response per system conducting benchmarkingis assumed.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-4 December 2011TotalSource May-12 to April-13 May-13 to April-14 May-14 to April-15 May-12 to April-15 Annual(Exhibit) Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Labor O&M Capital Total AveragePWSsStart-up [1] F.7 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoringF.9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$CryptosporidiumMonitoringF.10 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Reporting F.11 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$UCFWR Reporting [3] F.13 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Technology Reporting F.16 486,845$ -$ -$ 1,121,624$ -$ -$ 1,683,921$ -$ -$ 3,292,390$ -$ -$ 3,292,390$ 1,097,463$Disinfection Benchmarking [4] F.17 224,762$ -$ -$ 208,911$ -$ -$ 173,068$ -$ -$ 606,741$ -$ -$ 606,741$ 202,247$Assessment for Bin ReclassificationE. coliMonitoringF.19 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 93,595$ 58,195$ -$ 93,595$ 58,195$ -$ 151,790$ 50,597$CryptosporidiumMonitoringF.20 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 113,022$ 1,797,500$ -$ 113,022$ 1,797,500$ -$ 1,910,522$ 636,841$Reporting F.21 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,569$ -$ -$ 75,569$ -$ -$ 75,569$ 25,190$PWSs - Total 711,607$ -$ -$ 1,330,535$ -$ -$ 2,139,174$ 1,855,695$ -$ 4,181,317$ 1,855,695$ -$ 6,037,012$ 2,012,337$States and TerritoriesStart-up [5] F.8 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Reporting and bin determination F.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 269,560$ -$ -$ 269,560$ -$ -$ 269,560$ 89,853$Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [6] F.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Technology Reporting F.15 438,898$ -$ -$ 1,011,161$ -$ -$ 1,518,080$ -$ -$ 2,968,139$ -$ -$ 2,968,139$ 989,380$Disinfection Benchmarking [7] F.18 194,522$ -$ -$ 180,803$ -$ -$ 149,782$ -$ -$ 525,107$ -$ -$ 525,107$ 175,036$States and Territories - Total 633,420$ -$ -$ 1,191,964$ -$ -$ 1,937,423$ -$ -$ 3,762,807$ -$ -$ 3,762,807$ 1,254,269$Total 1,345,027$ -$ -$ 2,522,500$ -$ -$ 4,076,597$ 1,855,695$ -$ 7,944,124$ 1,855,695$ -$ 9,799,818$ 3,266,606$Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.SourcesSee Exhibit F.23 for a breakdown of cost by year and system type.Years below are years post-promulgation.(7) State costs associated with reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system costs.(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.(2) All initialE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring by systems (Assessment for binning) was completed by Year 6.Exhibit F.5 Cost for the ICR Approval Period(3) Systems are assumed to have incurred costs associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs during Years 1-3.(6) Costs associated with reviewing reports on uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been incurred during Years 1-3.(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.(4) Costs associated with disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to be incurred prior to treatment installation.Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-5 December 2011Implementation Monitoring for Initial Bin ClassificationNumber ofFilteredSystemsNumber ofUnfilteredSystemsBaseline #PWSsPercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatmentPrior to RulePromulgationPlantsPerSystemBaseline # ofPlantsConductingE.coliMonitoringPercent ofPlantsTriggered toMonitor forCryptosporidiumBaseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringPercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatment forLT2CompliancePercent ofPlants with >5.5 LogTreatment forStage 2ComplianceBaseline # ofPlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringBaseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringA B C=A+B D E F = A*E*(1-D) G H=F*G+B*E I J K = F*(1-I-J) L = G*KCWSs<100 3841385 3.6% 1.0 37735% 132 5.3% 15.0% 300104100-499 6494653 3.6% 1.1 66535% 236 5.3% 6.3% 588204500-999 3482350 3.6% 1.0 34435% 122 5.3% 6.3% 3041061,000-3,299 9651966 3.6% 1.0 93035% 325 9.7% 1.8% 8232873,300-9,999 1,010-1,010 3.6% 1.1 1,04035% 362 9.5% 1.8% 92232110,000-49,999 9735978 0.4% 1.1 1,0471,052 30.4% 1.5% 71371350,000-99,999 2241225 0.4% 1.4 302303 30.3% 1.5% 206206100,000-999,999 236-236 0.4% 1.5 356356 29.7% 1.5% 2452451,000,000+ 17118 0.4% 3.7 6266 29.7% 1.5% 4343National Totals 4,807154,8225,1222,9534,1452,229NTNCWSs<100 104-104 3.6% 1.0 10035% 35 5.3% 15.0% 8028100-499 162-162 3.6% 1.0 15635% 54 5.3% 6.3% 13848500-999 47-47 3.6% 1.0 4535% 16 5.3% 6.3% 40141,000-3,299 42-42 3.6% 1.0 4135% 14 9.7% 1.8% 36123,300-9,999 7-7 3.6% 1.0 735% 2 9.5% 1.8% 6210,000-49,999 1-1 0.4% 1.0 11 30.4% 1.5% 1150,000-99,999 --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -0100,000-999,999 --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -01,000,000+ --0 0.4% 1.0 -0 0.0% 1.5% -0National Totals 363-363350123301105TNCWSs<100 5442546 0.0% 1.0 54435% 191 5.3% 0.0% 516179100-499 4441445 0.0% 1.0 44435% 156 5.3% 0.0% 421146500-999 66-66 0.0% 1.0 6635% 23 5.3% 0.0% 63221,000-3,299 63-63 0.0% 1.0 6335% 22 9.7% 0.0% 57203,300-9,999 16-16 0.0% 1.0 1635% 6 9.5% 0.0% 14510,000-49,999 1-1 0.0% 1.0 11 30.4% 0.0% 1150,000-99,999 --0 0.0% 1.0 -0 0.0% 0.0% -0100,000-999,999 --0 0.0% 1.0 -0 14.8% 0.0% -01,000,000+ --0 0.0% 1.0 -0 58.6% 0.0% -0National Totals 1,13531,1381,1353991,071373Grand Totals 6,305186,3236,6073,4745,5162,707Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.Sources:(J) EPA assumes only membrane plants will have > 5.5 logCryptosporidiumtreatment as a result of the Stage 2 DBPR. Estimates from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.Exhibit F.6a Baseline Number of Plants for Rule Start-up and Monitoring ActivitiesSystem Size(PopulationServed)(I) Derived from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis; this number is calculated by dividing the number of plants achieving 5.5 log treatment for the LT2ESWTR by the total number of plants forthe size category.(C) Number of systems from SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.(D) EPA assumes only membrane filtration plants will have > 5.5 logCryptosporidiumtreatment prior to rule promulgation. Plants estimated to have membrane filtration as a result of Stage 1 DBPRcompliance are from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.(E) For CWSs, from the 2006 CWSS. NCWSs are assumed to have one plant per system.(G) Percentage of plants triggered intoCryptosporidiummonitoring is estimated from the modeled Information Collection Rule Occurrence Distribution. All systems serving greater than 10,000 people mustconductCryptosporidiummonitoring.Future Monitoring for Re-BinningMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-6 December 2011Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate ComponentsBase HourlyLabor CostECI in Year ofDataECI20102010 LaborCostA B C D=A*(C/B)43.79$ 1.0 1.0 43.79$Technical Wage Rates by System Size25-100101-500 500-3.3k 3.3k-10k 10k-100k >100kBase Wage Rate ($2010) 20.24$ 20.24$ 20.24$ 20.24$ 20.24$ 20.24$Loaded Wage Rate ($2010) 32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$Loaded Wage Rate ($2010) 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$Sources: (A) National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 19-2041, "State Government- Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health". May 2010 data (published in May 2011).http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm. Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.(B) - (C) Not required (source data is in 2010$)State EmployeeExhibit F.6b Labor RatesSource: National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water andLiquid Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm.Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.Cost ElementRateSystem sizeMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-7 December 2011Laboratory Cost Per Sample [1]Range [2]Min MaxCryptosporidium[3] 708$ 520$ 953$ $18,412E. Coli(1) Utility Analysis 281651730(2) Commercial Lab 94801142,434CostsAverageMinimum MaximumCryptoAnalytical 539$ 401$ 647$E. coli AnalyticalCommercial47$ 33$ 67$Utility28$ 16$ 51$Shipping (lbs)7 4725 9350 145Mean - 37.6 11964 162Subsample 510187Crypto Total$ 708 $ 520 $ 953E. coli commercialTotal$ 94 $ 80 $ 114E. coli analytical Total$ 28 $ 16 $ 51Exhibit F.6b (continued) Labor RatesE. coli commercial shipping costs were estimated byassuming that two 125-mL sample containers would beshipped to the laboratory in a 10-quart polyethylene coolerpacked with approximately 4 lb of UTEK gel paks.The approximate weight of the shipment, given theseassumptions, is 7 lb. Using this weight, we estimated shippingcosts for standard overnight service for shipments to 12locations using the Fed Ex web site.Total LaboratoryCost per PlantAverage[1] Lab costs based on EPA subcontractor (DynCorp) survey of laboratories.Cryptosporidium costs assume all plants must send samples to commerciallaboratories and that 27 percent of samples will require multiple subsamplesanalysis at additional cost (based on Supplemental Survey results). E. Coli costsare provided for utility analysis (no shipping) and commercial analysis, whichincludes overnight shipping charges.[3] Assumes monthly Cryptosporidium monitoring, plus two matrix spike samplesto be analyzed at the beginning of monitoring and bi-weekly E. Coli monitoring.These are conservative estimates, therefore laboratory costs could be lower.[2] Minimum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the minimum analytical costand the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package (average weight ofsample as observed during the Supplemental Survey, estimated by KevinConnell) overnight (FedEx). Maximum costs are estimated from DynCorp for themaximum analytical costs, the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package(average weight of sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey,estimated by Kevin connell) overnight (FedEx), and the maximum cost of anadditional subsample analysis, also estimated by DynCorp.AnalyteNote: Lab costs per sample updated to $2010, from BLS, using PPI (annual, allcommodities).Note: Lab costs per sample and shipping costs updated to$2010, from BLS, using PPI (annual, all commodities).Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-8 December 2011System Size(PopulationServed)ReadHours perPWSTrainHours perPWSTotalHours perPWSCost perLabor HourBaseline #of SystemsConductingImplementation Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)AB C = A +BD E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 35155032.38$ 385623,868$ 19,2659.3100-499 35155032.38$ 6531,057,724$ 32,66215.7500-999 35155032.38$ 350566,916$ 17,5068.41,000-3,299 35155032.38$ 9661,564,335$ 48,30623.23,300-9,999 35155032.38$ 1,0101,635,726$ 50,51024.310,000-49,999 35155032.38$ 9781,583,578$ 48,90023.550,000-99,999 35306532.38$ 225473,616$ 14,6257.0100,000-999,999 35306532.38$ 236496,771$ 15,3407.41,000,000+ 35306532.38$ 1837,889$ 1,1700.6National Totals 4,8228,040,422$ 248,284119.4NTNCWSs<100 35155032.38$ 104168,543$ 5,2052.5100-499 35155032.38$ 162262,419$ 8,1033.9500-999 35155032.38$ 4776,102$ 2,3501.11,000-3,299 35155032.38$ 4268,079$ 2,1021.03,300-9,999 35155032.38$ 711,334$ 3500.210,000-49,999 35155032.38$ 11,619$ 500.050,000-99,999 35306532.38$ --$ --100,000-999,999 35306532.38$ --$ --1,000,000+ 35306532.38$ --$ --National Totals 363588,097$ 18,1608.7TNCWSs<100 35155032.38$ 546884,791$ 27,32213.1100-499 35155032.38$ 445720,739$ 22,25610.7500-999 35155032.38$ 66106,867$ 3,3001.61,000-3,299 35155032.38$ 63102,125$ 3,1541.53,300-9,999 35155032.38$ 1625,907$ 8000.410,000-49,999 35155032.38$ 11,619$ 500.050,000-99,999 35306532.38$ --$ --100,000-999,999 35306532.38$ --$ --1,000,000+ 35306532.38$ --$ --National Totals 1,1381,842,049$ 56,88127.3Grand Totals 6,32310,470,569$ 323,325155.4Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.Sources:Exhibit F.7 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)(A & B) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6b, column A.Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownforinformational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-9 December 2011Implementation ActivitiesCost perLabor Hour FTEs per State Hours per State Cost Per StateAB C = B*2080 D = A*CRegulation Adoption and Program Development 43.79$ 1.002,08091,087$Training State Staff 43.79$ 0.501,04045,544$Training PWS Staff and Technical Assistants 43.79$ 1.002,08091,087$Updating Data Management System 43.79$ 0.2552022,772$Public Notification 43.79$ 0.102089,109$Totals per State 2.855,928259,599$National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies) 162.45337,89614,797,142$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources:(A) See Labor Rates exhibit.(B) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Exhibit F.8 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associatedwith Rule Start-up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-10 December 2011Sampling Sample Analysis# ofE.coliSamplesHoursperSampleCostperLaborHourTotal SamplingLabor CostCommercialAnalysis(IncludesShipping)UtilityAnalysisHours perSample(Labor)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(O&M)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(Total)PercentUtilities withE. coliAnalysisCapabilitiesTotalLaboratoryAnalysis Cost(Labor)Total LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M) Responses RespondentsA B C D E = A*B*C*D F G H = I-G*D I J K = D*G*J*A*BL = F*A*B*(1-J)+H*A*B*J M = E+K+L N = A*B*C+A*B*G*JO =N/2,080 P = A*B QCWSs<100 37726 1.0032.38$ 317,147$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 19,822$ 736,586$ 1,073,555$ 10,4055.09,793377100-499 66526 1.0032.38$ 559,684$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 34,980$ 1,299,886$ 1,894,551$ 18,3638.817,283665500-999 34426 1.0032.38$ 289,759$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 18,110$ 672,976$ 980,846$ 9,5074.68,9483441,000-3,299 93026 1.0032.38$ 783,358$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 48,960$ 1,819,377$ 2,651,695$ 25,70212.424,1909303,300-9,999 1,04026 1.0032.38$ 875,671$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 54,729$ 2,033,775$ 2,964,175$ 28,73013.827,0401,04010,000-49,999 1,04724 1.0032.38$ 813,641$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 152,558$ 964,735$ 1,930,934$ 29,83614.325,1251,04750,000-99,999 30224 1.0032.38$ 234,409$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 43,952$ 277,939$ 556,300$ 8,5964.17,238302100,000-999,999 35624 1.0032.38$ 276,500$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% 69,125$ 170,679$ 516,304$ 10,6735.18,5383561,000,000+6224 1.0032.38$ 48,269$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% 12,067$ 29,796$ 90,132$ 1,8630.91,49162National Totals 5,1224,198,438$454,303$ 8,005,750$ 12,658,491$ 143,67469.1129,6455,122NTNCWSs<100 10026 1.00 32.38$ 84,487$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 5,280$ 196,225$ 285,993$ 2,7721.32,609100100-499 15626 1.00 32.38$ 131,545$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 8,222$ 305,518$ 445,285$ 4,3162.14,062156500-999 4526 1.00 32.38$ 38,149$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 2,384$ 88,601$ 129,134$ 1,2520.61,178451,000-3,299 4126 1.00 32.38$ 34,127$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 2,133$ 79,260$ 115,520$ 1,1200.51,054413,300-9,999 726 1.00 32.38$ 5,682$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 355$ 13,196$ 19,233$ 1860.1175710,000-49,999 124 1.00 32.38$ 774$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 145$ 918$ 1,838$ 280.024150,000-99,999 -24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ----100,000-999,999 -24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----1,000,000+-24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----National Totals 350294,764$18,520$ 683,719$ 997,003$ 9,6744.79,102350TNCWSs<100 54626 1.00 32.38$ 460,091$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 28,756$ 1,068,578$ 1,557,426$ 15,0957.314,207546100-499 44526 1.00 32.38$ 374,784$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 23,424$ 870,450$ 1,268,658$ 12,2965.911,573445500-999 6626 1.00 32.38$ 55,571$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 3,473$ 129,065$ 188,110$ 1,8230.91,716661,000-3,299 6326 1.00 32.38$ 53,105$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 3,319$ 123,339$ 179,763$ 1,7420.81,640633,300-9,999 1626 1.00 32.38$ 13,472$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 842$ 31,289$ 45,602$ 4420.24161610,000-49,999 124 1.00 32.38$ 777$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 146$ 922$ 1,844$ 290.024150,000-99,999 -24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ----100,000-999,999 -24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----1,000,000+-24 1.00 32.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ----National Totals 1,138957,801$59,960$ 2,223,642$ 3,241,403$ 31,42815.129,5761,138Grand Totals 6,6105,451,003$532,782$ 10,913,111$ 16,896,897$ 184,77688.8168,3246,610Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column D.(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.(C) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002 (updated to $2010).(G) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(H) The amount left after labor is subtracted from the amount in column I.(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000 (updated to $2010).(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.Exhibit F.9 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated withE. coliMonitoring for Bin Determination (Completed in Year 6)Total Burden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs)System Size(PopulationServed)Baseline # ofPlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringTotal CostMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-11 December 2011Sampling Sample Analysis# ofCryptosporidiumSamplesHoursperSampleCostperLaborHourTotalSamplingLabor CostCost perSampleTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G = A*B*F H = E+G I = A*B*C J = I/2080 K = A*BCWSs<100 13226 1.432.38$ 152,932$ 708.17$ 2,432,231$ 2,585,163$ 4,7222.33,435100-499 23626 1.432.38$ 272,727$ 708.17$ 4,337,452$ 4,610,179$ 8,4224.06,125500-999 12226 1.432.38$ 141,024$ 708.17$ 2,242,849$ 2,383,873$ 4,3552.13,1671,000-3,299 32526 1.432.38$ 375,995$ 708.17$ 5,979,813$ 6,355,808$ 11,6115.68,4443,300-9,999 36226 1.432.38$ 419,008$ 708.17$ 6,663,903$ 7,082,911$ 12,9396.29,41010,000-49,999 1,05226 1.432.38$ 1,218,237$ 708.17$ 19,374,820$ 20,593,057$ 37,61818.127,35950,000-99,999 30326 1.432.38$ 350,736$ 708.17$ 5,578,107$ 5,928,844$ 10,8315.27,877100,000-999,999 35626 1.432.38$ 411,870$ 708.17$ 6,550,368$ 6,962,238$ 12,7186.19,2501,000,000+ 6626 1.432.38$ 76,146$ 708.17$ 1,211,020$ 1,287,166$ 2,3511.11,710National Totals 2,9533,418,675$ 54,370,563$ 57,789,239$ 105,56750.876,776NTNCWSs<100 3526 1.432.38$ 40,427$ 708.17$ 642,954$ 683,382$ 1,2480.6908100-499 5426 1.432.38$ 62,944$ 708.17$ 1,001,066$ 1,064,011$ 1,9440.91,414500-999 1626 1.432.38$ 18,254$ 708.17$ 290,313$ 308,567$ 5640.34101,000-3,299 1426 1.432.38$ 16,330$ 708.17$ 259,706$ 276,036$ 5040.23673,300-9,999 226 1.432.38$ 2,719$ 708.17$ 43,238$ 45,957$ 840.06110,000-49,999 126 1.432.38$ 1,153$ 708.17$ 18,345$ 19,499$ 360.02650,000-99,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---National Totals 123141,828$ 2,255,623$ 2,397,450$ 4,3802.13,185TNCWSs<100 19126 1.432.38$ 221,663$ 708.17$ 3,525,332$ 3,746,996$ 6,8453.34,978100-499 15626 1.432.38$ 180,089$ 708.17$ 2,864,135$ 3,044,224$ 5,5612.74,044500-999 2326 1.432.38$ 26,591$ 708.17$ 422,898$ 449,489$ 8210.45971,000-3,299 2226 1.432.38$ 25,411$ 708.17$ 404,133$ 429,544$ 7850.45713,300-9,999 626 1.432.38$ 6,446$ 708.17$ 102,521$ 108,967$ 1990.114510,000-49,999 126 1.432.38$ 1,158$ 708.17$ 18,412$ 19,570$ 360.02650,000-99,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---National Totals 399461,358$ 7,337,432$ 7,798,790$ 14,2466.810,361Grand Totals 3,4744,021,861$ 63,963,618$ 67,985,479$ 124,19359.790,322Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column F.(C) Additional consultation on burden for this activity was not sought for this ICR period as this activity was completed priorto this ICR period.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.10 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated withCryptosporidiumMonitoring for Bin Determination (Completed in Year 6)System Size(PopulationServed)Baseline #of PlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs)(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus twomatrix spike samples.(F) Taken from Exhibit F.6b.ResponsesMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-12 December 2011System Size(Population Served)Source WaterSampling Planhours per plantBin Classificationhours per plantTotalhoursper plantCost perLaborHourBaseline #of PlantsReporting Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)A B C=A+B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 37797,584$ 3,0131.4100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 665172,211$ 5,3182.6500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 34489,157$ 2,7531.31,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 930241,033$ 7,4433.63,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 1,040269,437$ 8,3204.010,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 1,047576,329$ 17,7978.650,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 302166,040$ 5,1272.5100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ 356299,542$ 9,2504.41,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ 6252,291$ 1,6150.8National Totals5,1221,963,623$ 60,63629.2NTNCWSs<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 100 25,996$ 8030.4100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 156 40,475$ 1,2500.6500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 45 11,738$ 3620.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 41 10,501$ 3240.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 7 1,748$ 540.010,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 1 549$ 170.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 0 -$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ 0 -$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ 0 -$ --National Totals350 91,007$ 2,8101.4TNCWSsExhibit F.11 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial BinClassification Monitoring (Completed in Year 6)<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 544 141,048$ 4,3552.1100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 444 115,059$ 3,5531.7500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 66 17,099$ 5280.31,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 63 16,340$ 5050.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 16 4,145$ 1280.110,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 1 551$ 170.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 0 -$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ 0 -$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ 0 -$ --National Totals1,135 294,242$ 9,0864.4Grand Totals6,607 2,348,872$ 72,53234.9Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A & B) Additional consultation on burden for this activity was not sought for this ICRperiod as this activity was completed prior to this ICR period.(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column D.(C) Although small systems will not reportE. coliandCryptosporidiumresults at the same time, the additionalreporting burden is assumed to be negligible.The decrease in burden forsmall plants that reportE. colibut are exempt fromCryptosporidiummonitoring is also assumed to be negligible.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-13 December 2011Initial Monitoring for Small Systems (Completed in Year 6)State ActivityFTEs per StateforE. coliMonitoringTotalHours forE. coliFTEs Per StateforCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal Hours forCryptosporidiumTotal FTEsPer State Total HoursCost perLabor Hour Total CostA B = A*2080 C D = C*2080 E = A+C F = B+D G H = F*GAnalyze PWS Reports andMake Bin Classifications0.3 624 0.2 416 0.5 1040 43.79$ 45,543.68$Respond to PWS 0.3 624 0.2 416 0.5 1040 43.79$ 45,543.68$Recordkeeping 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.5 1040 43.79$ 45,543.68$Totals per State 0.9 1,768 0.7 1,352 1.5 3,120 136,631.04$National Totals (57States/Primacy Agencies)48.5 100,776 37.1 77,064 85.5 177,840 7,787,969$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources(A), (C) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.Future MonitoringState ActivityFTEs per StateforE. coliMonitoring inSmall SystemsTotalHours forE. coliinSmallSystemsFTEs Per StateforCryptosporidiumMonitoring inSmall SystemsTotal Hours forCryptosporidiuminSmall SystemsFTEs PerState forCryptosporidiumMonitoring inMedium &LargeSystemsTotal Hours forCryptosporidiumin Medium &Large SystemsTotal FTEsPer State Total HoursCost perLaborHour Total CostA B = A*2080 C D = C*2080 E F = E*2080 G = A+C+E H = B+D+F I J = H*IAnalyze PWS Report andMake Bin Classifications0.2 416 0.1 208 0.1 208 0.4 832 43.79$ 36,434.94$Respond to PWS 0.2 416 0.1 208 0.1 208 0.4 832 43.79$ 36,434.94$Recordkeeping 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.25 520 0.75 1560 43.79$ 68,315.52$Totals per State 0.7 1,352 0.5 936 0.5 936 1.6 3,224 141,185$National Totals (57States/Primacy Agencies)37.1 77,064 25.7 53,352 25.7 53,352 88.4 183,768 8,047,568$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources(A), (C), (E) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.(I) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.12 Burden and Cost to States Associated withE. coliandCryptosporidiumMonitoring and Bin Determination (Initialand Future Rounds)Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-14 December 2011Exhibit F.13 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with UCFWR Reporting (Completed in Years 1-3)System Size(PopulationServed)ReportingUse ofUCFWRReporting Schedule forCovering UCFWR orDisinfecting UCFWR EffluentTotal Hoursper PWSCost perLabor HourBaseline # ofSystems withUCFWRs Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)A B C = A + B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 0.2588.2532.38$ 3802$ 250.01100-499 0.2588.2532.38$ --$ --500-999 0.2588.2532.38$ --$ --1,000-3,299 0.2588.2532.38$ --$ --3,300-9,999 0.2588.2532.38$ 92,405$ 740.0410,000-49,999 0.2588.2532.38$ 266,946$ 2150.1050,000-99,999 0.2588.2532.38$ 51,336$ 410.02100,000-999,999 0.2588.2532.38$ 379,885$ 3050.151,000,000+ 0.2588.2532.38$ 1267$ 80.00National Totals8121,641$ 6680.3Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.NTNCWS and TNCWS do not have UCFWRsSources:(A & B) Burden estimates for each activity are based on EPA experience with similar rules.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.(E) Exhibit 4.23, Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTRBurden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-15 December 2011State/Primacy Agency ActivityBaseline # of Systems withUCFWRsCost per LaborHourFTEs perUCFWRHours perUCFWRCost PerUCFWRAB C D E = B*DRecording Use of UCFWR 81 43.79$ 0.00010.2510.9$Approving State Schedule81 43.790.0005143.8$Totals per UCFWR 0.00061.2554.7$Burden and Cost per State/Primacy Agency 0.0114.46633.4$Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.Only the seven States/Primacy Agencies with UCFWRs are assumed to incur burden and costs for these activities.1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)Sources:(A) Carried forward from January 2006 ICR (expert estimates).(B) See Labor Rates exhibit.(C) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency based on EPA experience with previous regulations.Exhibit F.14 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associatedwith Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule (Completed in Years 1-3)Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shownfor informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-16 December 2011System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumberof PlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlantsInstallingBankFiltrationNumber ofUnfilteredPlantsInstallingOzone Total PlantsAnnualLaborHours perPlantLaborRateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsA B C D E = A+B+C+D F G H = E*F I = G*H<100 8588--17340 43.79$ 6,914302,793$100-499 7968--14740 43.79$ 5,896258,182$500-999 3237-06940 43.79$ 2,763121,003$1,000-3,299 12527-115440 43.79$ 6,145269,112$3,300-9,999 11623-114040 43.79$ 5,598245,162$10,000-49,999 366224139240 43.79$ 15,687686,978$50,000-99,999 10051010740 43.79$ 4,263186,678$100,000-999,999 11561012240 43.79$ 4,891214,190$1,000,000+ 2110-2240 43.79$ 88338,650$National Totals 1,038277641,32653,0402,322,748$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A)-(D) Taken from Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(F) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.15 Burden and Cost to States Associated with Reviewing Plants' Reports on TechnologyComplianceMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-17 December 2011System Size(PopulationServed)NumberPlantsInstallingUVNumberof PlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlants InstallingBank FiltrationNumber ofUnfilteredPlants InstallingOzone Total PlantsAnnualLaborHours perPlantLaborRateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsA B C D E=A+B+C+D F G H=E*F I=G*HCWS<100 1654--696032.38$ 4,143134,167$100-499 3748--856032.38$ 5,112165,555$500-999 2331-0536032.38$ 3,197103,538$1,000-3,299 11125-11386032.38$ 8,260267,504$3,300-9,999 11223-11366032.38$ 8,141263,635$10,000-49,999 36121413876032.38$ 23,219751,910$50,000-99,999 1005101076032.38$ 6,394207,071$100,000-999,999 1146101226032.38$ 7,301236,434$1,000,000+ 2010-216032.38$ 1,28841,711$National Totals 893214641,11867,0552,171,525$NTNCWS<100 928--376032.38$ 2,20571,420$100-499 1317--306032.38$ 1,80358,402$500-999 56--106032.38$ 60919,733$1,000-3,299 82--96032.38$ 56918,419$3,300-9,999 20--26032.38$ 1494,814$10,000-49,999 100-26032.38$ 912,957$50,000-99,999 -----6032.38$ --$100,000-999,999 000-06032.38$ 18573$1,000,000+ -----6032.38$ --$National Totals 38520-915,445176,319$TNCWS<100 607--676032.38$ 4,023130,284$100-499 293--326032.38$ 1,92862,430$500-999 51--66032.38$ 33810,950$1,000-3,299 60--66032.38$ 38912,588$3,300-9,999 20--26032.38$ 1083,496$10,000-49,999 400-46032.38$ 2217,160$50,000-99,999 -----6032.38$ --$100,000-999,999 000-06032.38$ 18583$1,000,000+ 100-16032.38$ 361,161$National Totals 107110-1187,061228,651$Grand Totals 1,038277641,32679,5612,576,494$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A), (B), (C), (D) Taken from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis.(F) Burden estimate take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.16 Filtered and Unfiltered Plant Burden and Cost for Preparing Reports Demonstrating TechnologyComplianceSome unfiltered plants may install ozone treatment, but no new burden is expected to be incurred because ozone will replace thecurrently useddisinfectant.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-18 December 2011System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumber ofPlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofUnfilteredPlantsInstallingOzoneTotalNumber ofPlantsChangingDisinfectionAnnualLabor Hoursper Plant Labor RateTotalAnnualLaborHoursTotal AnnualCostsA B C D = A+B+C E F G = D*E H = F*GCWS<100 1654-692532.38$ 1,72655,902.84$100-499 3748-852532.38$ 2,13068,981.29$500-999 23310532532.38$ 1,33243,140.96$1,000-3,299 1112511382532.38$ 3,442111,459.97$3,300-9,999 1122311362532.38$ 3,392109,847.73$10,000-49,999 3612113832532.38$ 9,580310,231.06$50,000-99,999 100501062532.38$ 2,63885,439.22$100,000-999,999 114601202532.38$ 3,01297,552.98$1,000,000+ 201-212532.38$ 53417,281.91$National Totals 89321441,111225899,837.96$NTNCWS<100 928-372532.38$ 91929,758.46$100-499 1317-302532.38$ 75124,334.23$500-999 56-102532.38$ 2548,222.12$1,000-3,299 82-92532.38$ 2377,674.72$3,300-9,999 20-22532.38$ 622,005.91$10,000-49,999 10-22532.38$ 381,219.13$50,000-99,999 ----2532.38$ --$100,000-999,999 00-02532.38$ 7236.04$1,000,000+ ----2532.38$ --$National Totals 3852-9122573,450.61$TNCWS<100 607-672532.38$ 1,67654,284.86$100-499 293-322532.38$ 80326,012.38$500-999 51-62532.38$ 1414,562.52$1,000-3,299 60-62532.38$ 1625,244.97$3,300-9,999 20-22532.38$ 451,456.55$10,000-49,999 40-42532.38$ 912,951.51$50,000-99,999 ----2532.38$ --$100,000-999,999 00-02532.38$ 7240.44$1,000,000+ 10-12532.38$ 15480.54$National Totals 10711-11822595,233.77$Grand Totals 1,03827741,3206751,068,522.34$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.17 Plant Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking ReportsThis ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection andprofiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they willbe added in future ICRs.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-19 December 2011System Size(PopulationServed)Numberof PlantsInstallingUVNumber ofPlantsInstallingMF/UFNumber ofPlantsInstallingOzoneTotalNumber ofPlantsChangingDisinfectionLabor Hoursper Plant Labor RateTotal LaborHours Total CostsAB CD = A + B +C E F G = D*E H = F*G<100 8588-1731643.79$ 2,766121,117.04$100-499 7968-1471643.79$ 2,358103,272.87$500-999 32370691643.79$ 1,10548,401.06$1,000-3,299 1252711541643.79$ 2,458107,644.95$3,300-9,999 1162311401643.79$ 2,23998,064.81$10,000-49,999 3662213881643.79$ 6,213272,100.38$50,000-99,999 100501061643.79$ 1,68973,943.76$100,000-999,999 115601211643.79$ 1,93784,840.04$1,000,000+ 211-221643.79$ 35115,372.60$National Totals 1,03827741,320144394.13$ 924,757.51$Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.Sources:(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(F) See Labor Rates exhibit.Exhibit F.18 State Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking ReportsThis ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profilingburden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they will be added in futureICRs.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-20 December 2011Sampling Sample Analysis# ofE.coliSamplesHoursperSampleCost perLaborHourTotalSamplingLabor CostCommercialAnalysis(IncludesShipping)UtilityAnalysisHours perSample(Labor)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(O&M)UtilityAnalysisCost perSample(Total)PercentUtilities withE. coliAnalysisCapabilitiesTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(Labor)Total LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G H=I-G*D I J K = D*G*J*A*BL = F*A*B*(1-J)+H*A*B*J M = E+K+LN = A*B*C+A*B*G*J O = N/2,080 P = A*BCWSs<100 30026 132.38$ 252,744$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 15,796.48$ 587,006$ 855,546$ 8,2924.07,805100-499 58826 132.38$ 494,777$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 30,923.54$ 1,149,136$ 1,674,836$ 16,2337.815,278500-999 30426 132.38$ 256,156$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 16,009.78$ 594,932$ 867,098$ 8,4044.07,9101,000-3,299 82326 132.38$ 693,199$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 43,324.91$ 1,609,978$ 2,346,501$ 22,74310.921,4063,300-9,999 92226 132.38$ 776,642$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 48,540.11$ 1,803,777$ 2,628,959$ 25,48112.323,98210,000-49,999 71324 132.38$ 554,533$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 103,974.85$ 657,510$ 1,316,018$ 20,3349.817,12450,000-99,999 20624 132.38$ 159,864$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 29,974.48$ 189,551$ 379,389$ 5,8622.84,937100,000-999,999 24524 132.38$ 190,331$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% 47,582.74$ 117,489$ 355,402$ 7,3473.55,8771,000,000+ 4324 132.38$ 33,237$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% 8,309.15$ 20,516$ 62,062$ 1,2830.61,026National Totals4,1453,411,481$344,436$ 6,729,895$ 10,485,812$ 115,98155.8105,345NTNCWSs<100 8026 132.38$ 67,330$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 4,208.15$ 156,377$ 227,916$ 2,2091.12,079100-499 13826 132.38$ 116,290$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 7,268.10$ 270,087$ 393,644$ 3,8151.83,591500-999 4026 132.38$ 33,725$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 2,107.79$ 78,327$ 114,159$ 1,1060.51,0411,000-3,299 3626 132.38$ 30,199$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 1,887.43$ 70,138$ 102,224$ 9910.59333,300-9,999 626 132.38$ 5,039$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 314.95$ 11,704$ 17,058$ 1650.115610,000-49,999 124 132.38$ 528$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 98.96$ 626$ 1,252$ 190.01650,000-99,999 -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---National Totals301253,110$15,885$ 587,258$ 856,254$ 8,3064.07,816TNCWSs<100 51626 132.38$ 434,262$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 27,141.39$ 1,008,589$ 1,469,993$ 14,2486.813,410100-499 42126 132.38$ 354,246$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 22,140.38$ 822,749$ 1,199,135$ 11,6235.610,939500-999 6326 132.38$ 52,644$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 3,290.26$ 122,268$ 178,202$ 1,7270.81,6261,000-3,299 5726 132.38$ 47,970$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 2,998.14$ 111,412$ 162,381$ 1,5740.81,4813,300-9,999 1426 132.38$ 12,196$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 25% 762.26$ 28,326$ 41,284$ 4000.237710,000-49,999 124 132.38$ 541$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% 101.46$ 642$ 1,284$ 200.01750,000-99,999 -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 75% -$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -24 132.38$ -$ 93.62$ 0.25 19.99$ 28.09$ 100% -$ -$ -$ ---National Totals1,071901,860$56,434$ 2,093,986$ 3,052,279$ 29,59214.227,849Grand Totals 5,5164,566,451$416,755$ 9,411,139$ 14,394,345$ 153,87974.0141,009Notes:Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column I.(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002. Updated to $2010.(G) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(H) The amount left over after the cost of labor is subtracted from the cost of utility analysis provided in Column I.(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000. Updated to $2010.(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.Exhibit F.19 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin ReclassificationTotalBurden(FTEs) ResponsesSystem Size(PopulationServed)Baseline #of PlantsConductingE. coliMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-21 December 2011Sampling Sample Analysis# ofCryptosporidiumSamplesHours perSampleCost perLabor HourTotalSamplingLabor CostCost perSampleTotal LaboratoryAnalysis Cost(O&M)A B C D E = A*B*C*D F G = A*B*F H = E+G I = A*B*CJ =I/2080 K = A*BCWSs<100 10426 1.432.38$ 120,938$ 708.17$ 708$ 121,646$ 3,7341.82,716100-499 20426 1.432.38$ 236,751$ 708.17$ 3,765,278$ 4,002,029$ 7,3113.55,317500-999 10626 1.432.38$ 122,571$ 708.17$ 1,949,365$ 2,071,936$ 3,7851.82,7531,000-3,299 28726 1.432.38$ 331,696$ 708.17$ 5,275,281$ 5,606,977$ 10,2434.97,4493,300-9,999 32126 1.432.38$ 371,623$ 708.17$ 5,910,288$ 6,281,911$ 11,4765.58,34610,000-49,999 71326 1.432.38$ 826,022$ 708.17$ 13,137,049$ 13,963,072$ 25,50712.318,55150,000-99,999 20626 1.432.38$ 238,131$ 708.17$ 3,787,225$ 4,025,356$ 7,3533.55,348100,000-999,999 24526 1.432.38$ 283,514$ 708.17$ 4,509,000$ 4,792,514$ 8,7554.26,3671,000,000+ 4326 1.432.38$ 49,509$ 708.17$ 787,386$ 836,894$ 1,5290.71,112National Totals2,2292,580,753$ 39,121,581$ 41,702,335$ 79,69238.357,958NTNCWSs<100 2826 1.432.38$ 32,218$ 708.17$ 512,388$ 544,606$ 9950.5724100-499 4826 1.432.38$ 55,645$ 708.17$ 884,971$ 940,615$ 1,7180.81,250500-999 1426 1.432.38$ 16,137$ 708.17$ 256,646$ 272,783$ 4980.23621,000-3,299 1226 1.432.38$ 14,450$ 708.17$ 229,815$ 244,266$ 4460.23253,300-9,999 226 1.432.38$ 2,411$ 708.17$ 38,348$ 40,760$ 740.05410,000-49,999 126 1.432.38$ 786$ 708.17$ 12,503$ 13,289$ 240.01850,000-99,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---National Totals105121,647$ 1,934,672$ 2,056,319$ 3,7561.82,732TNCWSs<100 17926 1.432.38$ 207,794$ 708.17$ 3,304,761$ 3,512,555$ 6,4173.14,667100-499 14626 1.432.38$ 169,507$ 708.17$ 2,695,833$ 2,865,339$ 5,2342.53,807500-999 2226 1.432.38$ 25,190$ 708.17$ 400,625$ 425,815$ 7780.45661,000-3,299 2026 1.432.38$ 22,954$ 708.17$ 365,056$ 388,010$ 7090.35153,300-9,999 526 1.432.38$ 5,836$ 708.17$ 92,813$ 98,649$ 1800.113110,000-49,999 126 1.432.38$ 806$ 708.17$ 12,819$ 13,625$ 250.01850,000-99,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---100,000-999,999 -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---1,000,000+ -26 1.432.38$ -$ 708.17$ -$ -$ ---National Totals373432,087$ 6,871,906$ 7,303,993$ 13,3436.49,704Grand Totals 2,7073,134,487$ 47,928,159$ 51,062,646$ 96,79146.570,394Notes:(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column J.(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.(F) Taken from Exhibit F.6b.Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.System Size(PopulationServed)Baseline # ofPlantsConductingCryptosporidiumMonitoringTotal CostTotalBurden(Hours)TotalBurden(FTEs) ResponsesAssume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidiummonitoring, and are therefore exempt from futureCryptosporidiummonitoring.Exhibit F.20 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Reclassification(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two matrix spikesamples.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-22 December 2011System Size(Population Served)Source WaterSampling Planhours per plantBin ReClassification hoursper plantHoursperPlantCost perLabor HourBaseline # ofPlantsReporting Total CostTotal Burden(Hours)Total Burden(FTEs)A B C=A+B D E F = C*D*E G = C*E H = G/2080CWSs<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 30077,767$ 2,4011.2100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 588152,239$ 4,7012.3500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 30478,817$ 2,4341.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 823213,292$ 6,5863.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 922238,967$ 7,3793.510,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 713392,794$ 12,1295.850,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 206113,237$ 3,4971.7100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ 245206,192$ 6,3673.11,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ 4336,006$ 1,1120.5National Totals4,1451,509,311$ 46,60722.4NTNCWSs<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 8020,717$ 6400.3100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 13835,781$ 1,1050.5500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 4010,377$ 3200.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 369,292$ 2870.13,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 61,551$ 480.010,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 1374$ 120.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ --$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ --$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ --$ --National Totals30178,092$2,4111.2Exhibit F.21 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Schedule and Bin ReClassification Monitoring,$,TNCWSs<100 1 7 8 32.38$ 516133,619$ 4,1262.0100-499 1 7 8 32.38$ 421108,999$ 3,3661.6500-999 1 7 8 32.38$ 6316,198$ 5000.21,000-3,299 1 7 8 32.38$ 5714,760$ 4560.23,300-9,999 1 7 8 32.38$ 143,753$ 1160.110,000-49,999 1 16 17 32.38$ 1383$ 120.050,000-99,999 1 16 17 32.38$ --$ --100,000-999,999 10 16 26 32.38$ --$ --1,000,000+ 10 16 26 32.38$ --$ --National Totals1,071277,712$ 8,5764.1Grand Totals5,5161,865,115$ 57,59427.7SourcesAssume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidiummonitoring, and are therefore exempt from futureCryptosporidiummonitoring.(A), (B) Estimates takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column I.(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-23 December 2011ActivitySource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12CWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F.7, Column G 16,510 14,625 217,149Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.9, Column N 3,134 10,566 68,703 61,271CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.10, Column I 3,767 12,950 27,992 18,809 21,024 21,024Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column G 2,740 8,055 25,334 20,019 2,382 2,382UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column G 334 334Technology Reporting [4] Exhibit F.16, Column H8,031 21,795 42,138 50,307 61,285 67,055Disinfection Benchmarking [5]Exhibit F.17, Column G 973 2,195 3,153 5,798 5,798 4,825 3,603 1,322Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.19, Column N5,780 12,329 52,210CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.20, Column I6,980 15,195 14,592ReportingExhibit F.21, Column G4,667 8,602 16,724Yearly Total 26,485 46,530 339,178 101,072 25,601 26,559 13,829 27,593 46,963 71,337 98,734 150,582NTNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F.7, Column G - - 18,160Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.9, Column N 0 0 4,837 4,837CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.10, Column I 0 0 18 18 2,172 2,172Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column G 0 0 1,161 1,161 244 244UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column GTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F.16, Column H11 55 2,216 2,768 4,377 5,445Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F.17, Column G 1 5 9 498 498 497 493 245Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.19, Column N0 5 4,153CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.20, Column I0 6 12Reporting Exhibit F.21, Column G0 3 997Yearly Totals 0 0 24,176 6,017 2,422 2,425 509 553 2,712 3,261 4,636 10,607TNCWSsStart-up [1] Exhibit F.7, Column G - - 56,881Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.9, Column N 0 0 15,714 15,714CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.10, Column I 0 0 18 18 7,105 7,105Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column G 0 0 3,749 3,749 806 806UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column GTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F.16, Column H32 143 2,923 3,646 5,703 7,061Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F.17, Column G 4 14 23 645 645 640 631 311Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoring Exhibit F.19, Column N0 5 14,796CryptosporidiumMonitoring Exhibit F.20, Column I0 6 12Reporting Exhibit F.21, Column G0 0 3,553Yearly Totals 0 0 76,363 19,486 7,924 7,934 677 787 3,563 4,277 6,026 25,422States and TerritoriesStart-upExhibit F.7, Column E, andExhibit F.8, Column C 13,574 12,024 312,298Bin Determination andReviewing Monitoring Data [7]Exhibit F.12, Column B,Column D 50,38850,38838,53238,532 12,311 26,822 76,705Reviewing/Approving UCFWRSchedule [8] Exhibit F.14, Column C 51 51Technology Reporting [9] Exhibit F.15, Column H5,382 14,662 31,518 37,813 47,577 53,040Disinfection Benchmarking [10] Exhibit F.18, Column G 6271417 2038 4442 4442 3815 3025 1202Yearly Totals 13,574 12,075 362,736 51,015 39,949 40,570 9,824 19,104 35,333 53,150 75,601 129,746Grand Totals 40,059 58,605 802,452 177,590 75,896 77,488 24,839 48,038 88,572 132,024 184,996 316,356Notes:[10] State activities will parallel system activities.[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.[9] State activities will parallel system activities.[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion ofCryptosporidiummonitoring.[7] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during futuremonitoring.[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatmentinstallation.[8] State activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed during Years 2-3.Exhibit F.22 12-Year Summary of Burden Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR (Hours)This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden and costs associated with systemschanging treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they will be added in future ICRs.[1] Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.[2] The first round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring was completed during the previous ICR clearance period.[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring for re-binning for a given system will begin 6.5 years after that system's completion of initialmonitoring.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-24 December 2011Activity Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12CWSsStart-up [1]Exhibit F.7, ColumnF534,660 473,616 7,032,147Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.9, Column M 151,609 581,368 6,177,637 5,747,877CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.10, Column H 2,062,351 7,089,124 15,323,301 10,296,528 11,508,967 11,508,967Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column F 88,730 260,852 820,409 648,287 77,152 77,152UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column F 10,820 10,820Technology Reporting [4]Exhibit F.16, Column260,069 705,825 1,364,605 1,629,134 1,984,645 2,171,525Disinfection Benchmarking [5]Exhibit F.17, Column H 31,511 71,078 102,101 187,754 187,754 156,243 116,676 42,827Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.19, ColumnM303,580 727,431 4,939,327CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.20, Column H3,821,043 8,318,150 7,987,875Reporting Exhibit F.21, Column F151,138 278,575 27,175Yearly Total2,848,170$ 8,415,780$ 29,353,493$ 16,724,204$ 11,657,197$ 11,688,220$ 447,823$ 893,579$ 1,520,849$ 6,021,571$ 11,351,628$ 15,125,901$NTNCWSsStart-up [1]Exhibit F.7, ColumnF- - 588,097Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.9, Column M 0 0 498,501 498,501CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.10, Column H 0 0 9,749 9,749 1,188,976 1,188,976Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column F 0 0 37,588 37,588 7,915 7,915UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column FTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F.16, Column I344 1,789 71,758 89,628 141,761 176,319Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F.17, Column H 47 169 291 16,130 16,130 16,083 15,961 7,919Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.19, Column M0 313 428,127CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.20, Column H0 3,322 6,645Reporting Exhibit F.21, Column F0 93 32,284Yearly Totals-$ -$ 1,133,936$ 545,886$ 1,197,060$ 1,197,182$ 16,474$ 17,919$ 87,841$ 105,589$ 153,409$ 643,374$TNCWSsStart-up [1]Exhibit F.7, ColumnF- - 1,842,049Assessment for Binning [2]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.9, Column M 0 0 1,620,701 1,620,701CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.10, Column H 0 0 9,785 9,785 3,889,610 3,889,610Reporting Exhibit F.11, Column F 0 0 121,423 121,423 26,087 26,087UCFWR Reporting [3] Exhibit F.13, Column FTechnology Reporting [4] Exhibit F.16, Column I1,046 4,617 94,655 118,061 184,701 228,651Disinfection Benchmarking [5] Exhibit F.17, Column H 144 439 734 20,878 20,878 20,734 20,439 10,072Assessment for BinReclassification [6]E. coliMonitoringExhibit F.19, Column M0 321 1,526,140CryptosporidiumMonitoringExhibit F.20, Column H0 3,406 6,812ReportingExhibit F.21, ColumnF0 96 115,049Yearly Totals-$ -$ 3,593,959$ 1,752,054$ 3,916,136$ 3,916,431$ 21,924$ 25,495$ 115,388$ 138,500$ 198,596$ 1,876,652$States and TerritoriesStart-upExhibit .7, Column E,Exhibit F.8, Column D594,431 526,563 13,676,147Bin Determination andReviewing Monitoring Data [7]Exhibit F.12, Column G,Column I-$ -$ 2,206,591$ 2,206,591$ 1,687,393$ 1,687,393$ -$ -$ -$ 539,121$ 1,174,578$ 3,359,084$Reviewing/Approving UCFWRSchedule [8]Exhibit F.14, Column D2,217$ 2,217$Technology Reporting [9] Exhibit F.15, Column I235,709 642,087 1,380,236 1,655,924 2,083,498 2,322,748Disinfection Benchmarking [10 Exhibit F.18, ColumnH27,43762041 89251 194522 194522 167085 132480 52635Yearly Totals594,431$ 528,780$ 15,884,956$ 2,234,028$ 1,749,435$ 1,776,645$ 430,231$ 836,608$ 1,547,320$ 2,327,525$ 3,310,711$ 5,681,833$Grand Totals3,442,601$ 8,944,560$ 49,966,343$ 21,256,172$ 18,519,827$ 18,578,478$ 916,452$ 1,773,601$ 3,271,398$ 8,593,186$ 15,014,344$ 23,327,760$Notes:[10] State activities will parallel system activities.[9] State activities will parallel system activities.Exhibit F.23 12-Year Summary of Cost Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR[7] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during future monitoring.[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatmentinstallation.[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion ofCryptosporidiummonitoring.[2] The first round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring was completed during the previous ICR clearance period.[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round ofE. coliandCryptosporidiummonitoring for re-binning for a given system will begin 6.5 years after that system's completion of initial monitoring.[1] Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR arenot yet available; they will be added in future ICRs.[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.[8] States are assumed to have completed review of uncovered finished water reservoir reports during Years 2-3.Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-25 December 2011Exhibit F.24 Implementation Timeline for the LT2ESWTRSystems Serving 50,000-99,999 PeopleSystems Serving100,000 PeopleSystems Serving 10,000-49,999 PeopleYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11Treatment InstallationPossible ExtensionTreatment InstallationPossible ExtensionTreatment InstallationPossible ExtensionCryptoMonitoring2ndRoundCryptoMon.CryptoMonitoringCryptoMonitoring2ndRoundCryptoMon.2ndRoundCryptoMon.Year 12 Year 13Systems Serving 50,000-99,999 PeopleSystems Serving100,000 PeopleSystems Serving 10,000-49,999 PeopleYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11Treatment InstallationPossible ExtensionTreatment InstallationPossible ExtensionTreatment InstallationPossible ExtensionCryptoMonitoring2ndRoundCryptoMon.CryptoMonitoringCryptoMonitoring2ndRoundCryptoMon.2ndRoundCryptoMon.Year 12 Year 13Systems Serving < 10,000 PeopleTreatment Installation Possible ExtensionCryptoMon.(Opt)E. coliMon.Filtered OnlyYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 132ndRoundE. coliMon.Filtered OnlySystems Serving < 10,000 PeopleTreatment Installation Possible ExtensionCryptoMon.(Opt)E. coliMon.Filtered OnlyYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 132ndRoundE. coliMon.Filtered OnlyMicrobial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-26 December 2011

# 2008 Burden Task Revised Burden

10 min E. col i sample analysis (by utility ) 15 min 

# Exhibit F.25

Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) -

Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates

Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR F-27 December 2011

# Appendix G

Ground Water Rule SpreadsheetsExhibit G.1 Labor RatesCost Assumptions: State Labor Rate ComponentsBase HourlyLabor CostECI in Year ofDataECI20102010 LaborCostA B C D=A*(C/B)58.86$ - - 58.86$43.79$ - - 43.79$Technical Wage Rates by System Size25-100101-500 500-3.3k 3.3k-10k 10k-100k >100kBase Wage Rate ($2010)20.24$20.24$20.24$20.24$20.24$ 20.24$Loaded Wage Rate ($2010)32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$Inflated Wage Rate ($2010) 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$32.38$ 32.38$Field EngineerState EmployeeCost ElementRateSystem sizeSources: (A) Field engineer wage rates from National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOCCode 17-2051 , "State Government - Civil Engineers," hourly mean wage rate. May 2010 data (published in May 2011).http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes172051.htm. Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.State Employee wage rates from National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 19-2041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health," hourly mean wage rate. May 2010 data(published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.(B) - (C) Not required (source data is in 2010$)Source: National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water andLiquid Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm.Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits. Wage rate is not inflated because source data year matches dollaryear.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 1December 2011SystemsSystemsDisinfectingSystemsDisinfecting;4-logSystemsNotDisinfectingSystemsPerformingSanitarySurveyABCD=A-BECommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10011,6836,1173,1815,56611,683101-50013,7379,3064,8394,43113,737501-1,0004,4633,5591,8519034,4631,001-3,3005,9645,0132,6079515,9643,301-10K3,1082,7361,4233723,10810,001-50K1,6611,5317961311,66150,001-100K1921779215192100,001-1 Million10410454-104555-5Totals40,91828,54814,84712,37040,918Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤1008,5712,9018995,6708,571101-5006,4672,7358483,7326,467501-1,0001,6608722707881,6601,001-3,3007635241622397633,301-10K10383262010310,001-50K129331250,001-100K-----100,001-1 Million----------Totals17,5767,1232,20810,45317,576Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10059,23813,7931,37945,44559,238101-50019,3585,50455013,85419,358501-1,0001,965700701,2651,9651,001-3,300568247253215683,301-10K66283386610,001-50K6204650,001-100K3--33100,001-1 Million----------Totals81,20420,2742,02760,93081,204Total All Systems139,69855,94519,08383,752139,698Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.(E) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.Exhibit G.2 Number of Systems Subject to Sanitary Surveys(C) Percentage of systems disinfecting to 4-log based on AWWA (1998).System Size(Population Served)> 1 Million> 1 Million> 1 Million(B) Column (A) times percent disinfecting. Percent disinfecting from SDWIS/FED 2010 data.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 2December 2011ABC=A*BDCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤1009,2760.383,51052101-50010,8570.414,45171501-1,0004,1320.492,045271,001-3,3006,2300.221,381333,301-10K3,6970.582,1423010,001-50K3,0592.216,7473450,001-100K9416.566,17412100,001-1 Million62710.636,6666> 1 Million-10.63--Totals38,82033,116264Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤1007,6720.221,68128101-5005,6190.231,26423501-1,0001,3900.2839161,001-3,3006010.7042243,301-10K771.84142110,001-50K96.9964050,001-100K-20.78--100,001-1 Million-33.67--> 1 Million-33.67--Totals15,3683,96562Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10057,8590.4727,062289101-50018,8080.489,03294501-1,0001,8950.601,138101,001-3,3005431.1059933,301-10K632.88182010,001-50K610.9764050,001-100K332.60980100,001-1 Million-52.83--> 1 Million-52.83--Totals79,17738,174396Grand Total133,36475,255723Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.- (no PWSs of this size category).Source:Exhibit G.3 Number of Entry Points Subject to Triggered MonitoringSystem Size(Population Served)Entry PointsTriggeredMonitoringMeanNumberof Samplesper EP per YearTriggeredMonitoringSamples/yearAverage PositiveTriggeredMonitoringEntry Points/year(A) Number of entry points from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.5b of the GWR EA, updated to current values bymultiplying by proportion of 2010 systems to original systems.(B) Mean triggered samples per system calculated from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.15 of the GWR EA.(D) Values in Column D, total entry points with positive triggered monitoring samples (Ex. G17b, col. D),divided by 22 years to obtain positive triggered monitoring EPs/year.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 3December 2011AB=C+D+ECDECommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤1004,2234,6073,470326811101-5006,1147,4605,905877678501-1,0002,2203,5122,9283462381,001-3,3002,9945,5564,8373993203,301-10K1,7263,7853,12038128410,001-50K1,0093,5662,81363012350,001-100K1201,126865107153100,001-1 Million658176809543> 1 Million56363--Totals18,47530,49324,6823,1602,651Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤1001,4091,522899136487101-5009791,358848114397501-1,000362401270291021,001-3,30017725416220713,301-10K28402631110,001-50K3530150,001-100K-----100,001-1 Million-----> 1 Million-----Totals2,9573,5802,2083021,069Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤1001,5907,7351,3791,0515,305101-5006242,6165503441,722501-1,0008028170351761,001-3,30026982512613,301-10K31332910,001-50K0100150,001-100K-1-00100,001-1 Million-----> 1 Million-----Totals2,32310,7452,0271,4447,274Grand Total23,75644,81828,9184,90610,994Notes:Source:(A) Exhibit G17a, Column I(C) Based on percentages from AWWA (1998).(D) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column E updated using ratio of 2010 systems to original systems.(E) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column F updated using ratio of 2010 systems to original systems.Exhibit G.4 Number of Systems Subject to Compliance MonitoringDetail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Entry Points Correctedto 4-log as a result of GWR;previously partiallydisinfectedEntry Points Correctedto 4-log as a result of GWR;previouslynondisinfectedSystem Size(PopulationServed)SystemsSubject toComplianceMonitoringEntry PointsSubject toComplianceMonitoringEntry PointsAchieving4-log Priorto GWRMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 4December 2011Exhibit G.5 Estimated System Burden and Costs for Start-Up ActivitiesExhibit G.5a Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)Service Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00016 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 16 16 16 16 32 32 32 3232 32 32 32 32 48 48 48 4832.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$1,036$ 1,036$ 1,036$ 1,036$ 1,036$ 1,554$ 1,554$ 1,554$ 1,554$Number of Systems 11,68313,7374,4635,9643,1081,6611921045Total labor burden 373,861439,587142,804190,85999,46379,7489,2114,99524312,107,112$ 14,235,599$ 4,624,569$ 6,180,763$ 3,221,018$ 2,582,544$ 298,278$ 161,767$ 7,855$Exhibit G.5b Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)Service Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0008 88 8 8 8 8 8 816 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1624 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2432.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$ 32.38$777$ 777$ 777$ 777$ 777$ 777$ 777$ 777$ 777$Number of Systems 67,80925,8253,6251,331169183--Total labor burden 1,627,416619,80087,00031,9444,05643272--52,702,240$20,071,603$2,817,408$1,034,474$131,350$13,990$2,332$-$-$Exhibit G.5c Sanitary Survey Start-UpService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0002 22 2 2 2 2 2 21 11 1 1 1 1 1 13 33 3 3 3 3 3 332.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$97$97$97$97$97$97$97$97$97$Number of Systems79,49239,5628,0887,2953,2771,6791951045Total labor burden238,476118,68624,26321,8869,8325,038585312157,722,822$3,843,538$785,729$708,756$318,389$163,158$18,934$10,110$491$Notes:1) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.3) These activities were completed in a prior ICR period.Total hours1Labor cost2(per hour)Total costCost ComponentRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationLabor cost2(per hour)Total cost per systemCost ComponentRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationTotal hours1Cost ComponentTotal cost per systemTotal cost per systemTotal costRead and Understand RulePlanning and MobilizationTotal hours1Labor cost2(per hour)Total costMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 5December 2011Exhibit G.6 Estimated State Burden and Costs for Start-Up ActivitiesExhibit G.6a Microbial Source & Compliance Monitoring Start-UpLabor Cost(per hour) Hours FTEs CostA B C=B/2,080 D=A*B43.79$ 600.032,628$43.79$ 1,0400.5045,544$43.79$ 8000.3835,034$43.79$ 2,0801.0091,087$43.79$ 2,0801.0091,087$43.79$ 5200.2522,772$Per State Total6,580288,151$National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)375,06016,424,628$Notes: Detail may not add due to independent rounding.Sources: (A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.Exhibit G.6b Annual Administrative ActivitiesLabor Cost(per hour) Hours FTEs CostA B C=B/2,080 D=A*B43.79$ 1,0400.5045,544$43.79$ 1,0400.5045,544$43.79$ 1,0400.5045,544$43.79$ 1,0400.5045,544$43.79$ 8800.4238,537$43.79$ 1040.054,554$5,144225,266$293,20812,840,165$Notes: Detail may not add due to independent rounding.These activities were completed in a prior ICR period.Sources: (A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.Lab CertificationOngoing Technical AssistanceNational Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)Per State TotalSDWIS ReportingRecordkeepingStaff TrainingCompliance ActivityCoordination with EPACompliance ActivityRead and Understand RuleRegulation Adoption and Program DevelopmentInitial Laboratory CertificationModify Data Management SystemsStaff TrainingSystem Training and Technical AssistanceMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 6December 2011LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectTreatmentReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportReview andDiscussion w/StateTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)A BC D EF=sum(B-E)G=A*FCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10032.38$1.10.81.21.34.4144$101-50032.38$1.20.81.21.34.5145$501-1,00032.38$1.51.11.71.35.6181$1,001-3,30032.38$2.21.32.91.47.7250$3,301-10K32.38$2.71.63.61.89.6309$10,001-50K32.38$3.72.04.31.911.8383$50,001-100K32.38$9.03.012.03.027.0874$100,000-1M32.38$15.0 8.024.03.050.01,619$>1,000,00032.38$24.0 10.0 36.04.074.01,619$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤10032.38$1.00.81.01.34.0131$101-50032.38$1.00.81.11.34.2135$501-1,00032.38$1.10.91.31.34.6149$1,001-3,30032.38$1.11.11.21.34.7152$3,301-10K32.38$1.51.51.71.56.2200$10,001-50K32.38$1.51.51.81.56.3202$50,001-100K32.38$8.01.52.31.513.3429$100,000-1M32.38$8.01.510.01.521.0680$>1,000,00032.38$NANANANANANATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10032.38$0.70.60.60.92.789$101-50032.38$0.70.60.60.92.789$501-1,00032.38$1.00.81.00.93.7121$1,001-3,30032.38$1.01.01.01.14.1133$3,301-10K32.38$1.21.31.21.24.8157$10,001-50K32.38$1.21.31.31.25.0160$50,001-100K32.38$ 8.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 11.8 381$100,000-1M 32.38$ 8.0 1.3 10.0 1.2 20.5 664$>1,000,000 32.38$ NA NA NA NA NA NANote:System Size(PopulationServed)2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10%of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Exhibit G.7a PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full andIncremental Sanitary Surveys (Treatment)(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 7December 2011LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportReview andDiscussionw/ StateTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)AB C DE=sum(B-D)F=A*ECommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10032.38$1.11.21.33.6118$101-50032.38$1.21.21.33.7118$501-1,00032.38$1.51.71.34.5146$1,001-3,30032.38$2.22.91.46.4208$3,301-10K32.38$2.73.61.88.0258$10,001-50K32.38$3.74.31.99.8318$50,001-100K32.38$9.0 12.03.024.0777$100,000-1M32.38$ 15.0 24.03.042.01,360$>1,000,00032.38$ 24.0 36.04.064.01,360$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤10032.38$1.01.01.33.3106$101-50032.38$1.01.11.33.4110$501-1,00032.38$1.11.31.33.7121$1,001-3,30032.38$1.11.21.33.6117$3,301-10K32.38$1.51.71.54.7151$10,001-50K32.38$1.51.81.54.8154$50,001-100K32.38$8.02.31.511.8381$100,000-1M32.38$8.0 10.01.519.5631$>1,000,00032.38$NANANANANATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10032.38$0.70.60.92.270$101-50032.38$0.70.60.92.270$501-1,00032.38$1.01.00.92.994$1,001-3,30032.38$1.01.01.13.1100$3,301-10K32.38$1.21.21.23.5113$10,001-50K32.38$1.21.31.23.7118$50,001-100K32.38$8.01.31.210.5338$100,000-1M32.38$8.0 10.01.219.2622$>1,000,00032.38$NANANANANANote:System Size(PopulationServed)1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industryrepresentatives.2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for anincremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (seeChapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).Exhibit G.7b PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Fulland Incremental Sanitary Surveys (No Treatment)(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have adistribution system.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 8December 2011LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectTreatmentReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportDocumentation/FileReviewReportDevelopment Data EntryReportReview andDiscussionw/ PWS TravelTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)A B C D EFG H IJ=sum(B-I)K=A*JCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10058.86$1.1 0.81.22.3 5.7 0.81.3 1.8 14.9879$101-50058.86$1.2 0.81.22.3 5.8 0.81.3 1.8 15.1887$501-1,00058.86$1.5 1.11.72.6 7.4 0.81.3 1.8 18.11,063$1,001-3,30058.86$2.2 1.32.93.4 8.8 1.21.4 1.8 22.81,341$3,301-10K58.86$2.7 1.63.63.7 9.6 1.31.8 1.8 25.91,525$10,001-50K58.86$3.7 2.04.35.3 10.1 1.41.9 1.8 30.31,785$50,001-100K58.86$9.0 3.012.0 12.0 12.0 2.03.0 1.8 54.83,223$100,000-1M58.86$15.0 8.024.0 18.0 18.0 3.03.0 1.8 90.85,342$>1,000,00058.86$24.0 10.0 36.0 18.0 18.0 4.04.0 1.8 115.85,342$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤10058.86$1.0 0.81.01.9 5.1 0.81.3 1.8 13.6800$101-50058.86$1.0 0.81.12.0 5.3 0.81.3 1.8 14.0825$501-1,00058.86$1.1 0.91.32.1 6.5 0.81.3 1.8 15.7925$1,001-3,30058.86$1.1 1.11.22.1 6.5 0.81.3 1.8 15.9933$3,301-10K58.86$1.5 1.51.72.2 6.7 0.81.5 1.8 17.61,033$10,001-50K58.86$1.5 1.51.82.5 6.7 0.81.5 1.8 18.01,060$50,001-100K58.86$8.0 1.52.32.5 10.0 0.81.5 1.8 28.31,666$100,000-1M58.86$8.0 1.510.0 8.0 10.0 1.01.5 1.8 41.82,458$>1,000,000NA NA NANANA NA NANA 1.8NANATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10058.86$0.7 0.60.61.5 5.1 0.80.9 1.8 11.9699$101-50058.86$0.7 0.60.61.5 5.3 0.80.9 1.8 12.1713$501-1,00058.86$1.0 0.81.01.8 5.8 0.80.9 1.8 13.9816$1,001-3,30058.86$1.0 1.01.01.8 5.8 0.81.1 1.8 14.3839$3,301-10K 58.86$ 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.8 5.8 0.8 1.2 1.8 15.0 882$10,001-50K 58.86$ 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.8 5.8 0.8 1.2 1.8 15.1 889$50,001-100K 58.86$ 8.0 1.3 1.3 3.0 8.0 0.8 1.2 1.8 25.3 1,489$100,000-1M 58.86$ 8.0 1.3 10.0 3.0 8.0 0.8 1.2 1.8 34.1 2,004$>1,000,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.8 NA NANote:System Size(PopulationServed)1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.Exhibit G.7c State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys(Treatment)2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply withrule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 9December 2011LaborCost(per hour)Review/InspectWellsReview/InspectDistributionSystemReportDocumentation/FileReviewReportDevelopment Data EntryReportReview andDiscussionw/ PWS TravelTotalUnit Burden(hours)Unit Cost(Full Survey)A B C DE F G HI=sum(B-H)J=A*ICommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10058.86$1.11.22.3 5.7 0.81.3 1.814.1831$101-50058.86$1.21.22.3 5.8 0.81.3 1.814.3840$501-1,00058.86$1.51.72.6 7.4 0.81.3 1.817.01,000$1,001-3,30058.86$2.22.93.4 8.8 1.21.4 1.821.51,265$3,301-10K58.86$2.73.63.7 9.6 1.31.8 1.824.31,433$10,001-50K58.86$3.74.35.3 10.1 1.41.9 1.828.31,667$50,001-100K58.86$9.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 2.03.0 1.851.83,046$100,000-1M58.86$15.0 24.0 18.0 18.0 3.03.0 1.882.84,871$>1,000,00058.86$24.0 36.0 18.0 18.0 4.04.0 1.8 105.84,871$Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤10058.86$1.01.01.9 5.1 0.81.3 1.812.8756$101-50058.86$1.01.12.0 5.3 0.81.3 1.813.3781$501-1,00058.86$1.11.32.1 6.5 0.81.3 1.814.9874$1,001-3,30058.86$1.11.22.1 6.5 0.81.3 1.814.8868$3,301-10K58.86$1.51.72.2 6.7 0.81.5 1.816.1945$10,001-50K58.86$1.51.82.5 6.7 0.81.5 1.816.5971$50,001-100K58.86$8.02.32.5 10.0 0.81.5 1.826.81,578$100,000-1M58.86$8.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 1.01.5 1.840.32,369$>1,000,000NA NANANA NA NANA NANANATransient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10058.86$0.70.61.5 5.1 0.80.9 1.811.3664$101-50058.86$0.70.61.5 5.3 0.80.9 1.811.5679$501-1,00058.86$1.01.01.8 5.8 0.80.9 1.813.0767$1,001-3,30058.86$1.01.01.8 5.8 0.81.1 1.813.3780$3,301-10K58.86$1.21.21.8 5.8 0.81.2 1.813.7803$10,001-50K58.86$1.21.31.8 5.8 0.81.2 1.813.8812$50,001-100K58.86$8.01.33.0 8.0 0.81.2 1.824.01,413$100,000-1M58.86$8.0 10.0 3.0 8.0 0.81.2 1.832.81,928$>1,000,000NA NANANA NA NANA NANANANote:System Size(PopulationServed)Exhibit G.7d State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental SanitarySurveys (No Treatment)1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not alreadycomply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 10December 2011Exhibit G.8a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered Monitoring (E. colisampling)Service Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.532.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$100.04$0.5 0.5 0.50.50.50.50.50.50.532.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$10.61$81.73$81.73$81.73$81.73$81.73$45.11$26.80$26.80$26.80$2.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.532.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$178.88$178.88$178.88$178.88$178.88$142.26$123.95$123.95$123.95$Notes:1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1. EPA assumes all sampling conducted by system operator.a) Total cost to system serving <10,000=.75*(Commercial analysis cost)+.25*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)b) Total cost to system serving 10,001-50,000=.25(Commercial analysis cost)+.75*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)c) Total cost to system serving >50,000=In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost5) Inflated to 2010 dollars from the 2006 estimate used in the GWR Economic Analysis using annual CPI-U, U.S. city average, all items, not seasonally adjusted.6) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.8b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Triggered Monitoring ReportService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0003.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.543.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$Notes:1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.Labor cost (per hour)Labor cost5(per hour)Total reporting costTotal cost3) EPA assumes that 25 percent of CWSs serving less than 10,000 individuals, 75 percent of systems serving 10,000 to 50,000 individuals, and all CWSs serving morethan 50,000 conduct in-house analysis; the remaining CWSs contract a commercial laboratory. EPA assumes all NCWSs contract a commercial laboratory. Therefore,EPA uses the following ratios to determine total cost of analysis:4) Inflated to 2010 dollars from the 2006 estimate used in the GWR Economic Analysis using annual PPI, all commodities, not seasonally adjusted (www.bls.gov/data).Cost ComponentSamplingIn-house materials cost4Laboratory Analysis2Total sampling costCommercial analysis cost3In-house labor (hours)Total costLabor cost2(per hour)Triggered Monitoring Review andCost ComponentExhibit G.8 Estimated Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered MonitoringSampling labor (hours)Labor cost1(per hour)Total analysis costMonitoring report labor (hours)ReportingMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 11December 2011Exhibit G.9 Estimated Burden & Costs for Corrective Action PlansExhibit G.9a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Corrective Action PlansService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00032.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$388.61$420.99$615.30$939.14$1,878.27$1,943.04$2,266.88$2,396.42$2,396.42$Notes:2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.9b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Corrective Action PlansService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,00058.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$58.86$706.37$765.23$1,118.42$1,707.06$3,414.11$1,765.92$2,060.24$2,177.97$2,177.97$Notes:2) Labor rates for field engineer from Exhibit G.1.7419291) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. Every system performing corrective actionis assumed to develop a corrective action plan.58Unit Plan CostCost ComponentLabor cost2(per hour)58 70377460Plan Review and Processing1(hours)12 13192930351) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. The ratio of state burden to systemburden for this activity is assumed to be 1:1 for systems serving 10,000 or fewer because small systems are assumed to require significant assistance tocomplete the plans. Because systems serving more than 10,000 are assumed to have more technical and managerial staff, their plans will require less review,and the ratio of state burden to system burden for these systems for this activity is assumed to be 0.5:1.Labor cost2(per hour)Unit Plan Review CostCost ComponentPlan Development andSubmission1(hours)12 1337Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 12December 2011UnitCost(2010$)Laborburden(per day)AnnualCostFrequencyAnnualLaborBurdenAnnualTotalCostA B C D=B*C E=A*B*CCompliance Monitoring Labor25-100 32.38$ 0.503651835,910$101-500 32.38$ 0.503651835,910$500-3.3k 32.38$ 0.503651835,910$Chlorine Test Kits25-100 41.31$ N/A 3.65 N/A 151$101-500 41.31$ N/A 3.65 N/A 151$500-3.3k 41.31$ N/A 3.65 N/A 151$Totals25-100183 6,061$101-500183 6,061$500-3.3k183 6,061$Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(C) Monitoring performed daily. New test kit needed every 100 days.UnitCost(2010$)QuantityPurchased(units;hours)TotalCostD=A*(C/B) E F=D*ECapital CostsChlorine analyzer (Hach CL17) 2,212$ 1 2,212$Power cord9$19$Exhibit G.10a PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving3,300 or Fewer PeopleExhibit G.10b PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving More than 3,300PeopleComponentComponent(A) Labor rate from Exhibit G.1. Test kit cost inflated from unit cost for test kit from Products forAnalysis, 1998 Hach Co. Model 2231-02, using PPI (annual, finished goods less food and energy,www.bls.gov/data)(B) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with waterindustry representatives.Powercord9$19$Chart recorder (Honeywell 10" round) 619$ 1 619$Installation labor (System Operator)3.3k-10k 32.38$ 8 259$10k-100k 32.38$ 8 259$>100k 32.38$ 8 259$Total Capital Cost3.3k-10k 3,100$10k-100k 3,100$>100k3,100$Annual Operation and MaintenanceCompliance monitoring (hours/year)3.3k-10k 32.38$ 80 2,591$10k-100k 32.38$ 80 2,591$>100k 32.38$ 80 2,591$Maintenance kit 170$ 1 170$Monthly reagents 22$ 12 263$Charts 18$ 1 18$Recorder pens 63$ 1 63$Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs3.3k-10k 3,105$10k-100k 3,105$>100k3,105$Notes: Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Source:Systems serving greater than 3,300 people conduct continuous monitoring and arerequired to record the lowest disinfection residual measured daily. Burden for thisactivity is assumed to be negligible.(A) Inflated from unit costs for equipment (both capital and O&M) from Products forAnalysis, 1998 Hach Co., using PPI for electrical machinery and equipment (chlorineanalyzer equipment) and for finished goods less food and energy (O&M equipment)from www.bls.gov/data. Labor rate from Exhibit G.1.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 13December 2011Exhibit G.11 Estimated Burden and Costs for Compliance MonitoringExhibit G.11a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Initial NotificationService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.50.50.50.50.50.50.5 0.532.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$16.19$Notes: 1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Notification DocumentationService Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0000.5 0.50.50.50.50.50.50.5 0.543.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$21.90$Notes: 1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11c Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure)Service Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0002.5 2.52.52.52.52.52.52.5 2.532.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$32.38$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$80.96$Notes: 1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.Exhibit G.11d Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)Service Population Category≤100 101-500 501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,0003.5 3.53.53.53.53.53.53.5 3.543.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$43.79$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$153.27$Notes: 1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.Total costCost ComponentDocument notification1(hours)Cost ComponentNotification labor1(hours)Labor cost2(per hour)Labor cost2(per hour)Total costLabor cost2(per hour)Total costTotal costCost ComponentReview report1(hours)Labor cost2(per hour)Cost ComponentReport labor1(hours)Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 14December 2011Exhibit G.12Respondents for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up 46,566 46,566 46,566 -------Sanitary Survey Start-Up46,566 46,566 46,566-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey---29,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,678Triggered Monitoring (EPs)---6,0626,0626,0626,0626,0626,0626,062Triggered Monitoring Reporting---723723723723723723723Corrective Action Plans (systems) - from significantdeficiencies and TM---1,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,704Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification (systems)---19,083Compliance Monitoring (EPs) [1]---4719431,4141,8852,3562,8283,299Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection FailureReports) (EPs)---1,4691,4931,5171,5401,5641,5871,611PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities46,56646,56646,56629,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,678StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up575757-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey---57575757575757Triggered Monitoring - Review Report---57575757575757Correction Action - Review Plans---57575757575757Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation---57575757575757Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)---57575757575757Annual Administration---57575757575757Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs46,56646,56646,56629,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,678States and Territories57575757575757575757Yearly Total 46,62346,62346,62329,73529,73529,73529,73529,73529,73529,735Notes:[1] Compliance monitoring must be conducted for all entry points that disinfect to 4-log. Once compliance monitoring is begun for an entry point, it must be continued. This calculation assumes that the initiationof this activity is evenly distributed across Years 4 to 25 post-implementation.Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 15December 2011Exhibit G.13Responses for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up46,566 46,566 46,566-------Sanitary Survey Start-Up46,566 46,566 46,566-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey---29,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,678Triggered Monitoring (samples)---89,89089,89089,89089,89089,89089,89089,890Triggered Monitoring Reporting---723723723723723723723Corrective Action Plans - from significantdeficiencies and TM---1,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,704Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification---28,918------Compliance Monitoring (samples)---172,012344,025516,037688,049860,0611,032,0741,204,086Compliance Monitoring Reporting (DisinfectionFailure) ---1,4691,4931,5171,5401,5641,5871,611Yearly Total 93,13293,13293,132324,394467,512639,548811,584983,6191,155,6551,327,691StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up575757-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey---29,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,67829,678Triggered Monitoring - Review Report---723723723723723723723Corrective Action - Review Plans---1,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,7041,704Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation ---28,918------Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)---1,4691,4931,5171,5401,5641,5871,611Annual Administration---57575757575757Yearly Total 57575762,54933,65533,67833,70233,72533,74933,773Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs93,13293,13293,132324,394467,512639,548811,584983,6191,155,6551,327,691States and Territories57575762,54933,65533,67833,70233,72533,74933,773Yearly Total 93,18993,18993,189386,943501,167673,226845,2851,017,3451,189,4041,361,464Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 16December 2011Exhibit G.14Burden for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up1,237,163 1,237,163 1,237,163-------Sanitary Survey Start-Up139,698 139,698 139,698-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey--- 105,062105,062105,062105,062105,062105,062105,062Triggered Monitoring--- 57,65557,65557,65557,65557,65557,65557,655Triggered Monitoring Reporting---1,8071,8071,8071,8071,8071,8071,807Corrective Action Plans--- 26,16926,16926,16926,16926,16926,16926,169Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification---9,542------Compliance Monitoring [1]--- 86,006172,012258,018344,025430,031516,037602,043Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)---3,6743,7333,7913,8503,9093,9684,027Yearly Total 1,376,861 1,376,861 1,376,861 289,915366,439452,504538,569624,634710,699796,764StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up125,020 125,020 125,020-------Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey--- 411,716 411,716 411,716 411,716 411,716 411,716 411,716Triggered Monitoring - Review Report---2,5302,5302,5302,5302,5302,5302,530Correction Action - Review Plans---25,340 25,34025,340 25,34025,34025,340 25,340Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation---14,459------Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)---5,1435,2265,3085,3905,4735,5555,638Annual Administration--- 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208 293,208Yearly Total 125,020 125,020 125,020 752,396 738,019 738,102 738,184 738,267 738,349 738,432Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9 Year 10PWSs1,376,8611,376,8611,376,861289,915366,439452,504538,569624,634710,699796,764States and Territories125,020125,020125,020752,396738,019738,102738,184738,267738,349738,432Yearly Total 1,501,8811,501,8811,501,8811,042,3111,104,4581,190,6051,276,7531,362,9001,449,0481,535,195Notes:[1] Compliance monitoring burden applies only to systems serving≤3,300 people, because systems larger than 3,300 people incur no significant labor burden for this activity. Systems larger than 3,300 monitor disinfectantresiduals continuously, and thus are required to report only the lowest reading each day.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 17December 2011Exhibit G.15Costs for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by ActivityPWSsYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesMicrobial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up $40,064,300 $40,064,300 $40,064,300 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Sanitary Survey Start-Up $4,523,976 $4,523,976 $4,523,976 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey -$ -$ -$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$ 3,401,553$Triggered Monitoring (Sampling and Analysis Labor) -$ -$ -$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$ 1,867,115$Triggered Monitoring Reporting -$ -$ -$ 58,512$ 58,512$ 58,512$ 58,512$ 58,512$ 58,512$ 58,512$Triggered Monitoring O&M -$ -$ -$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$ 5,625,152$Corrective Action Plans -$ -$ -$ 847,460$ 847,460$ 847,460$ 847,460$ 847,460$ 847,460$ 847,460$Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification -$ -$ -$ 308,992$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Compliance Monitoring -$ -$ -$ 2,785,222$ 5,570,445$ 8,355,667$ 11,140,890$ 13,926,112$ 16,711,335$ 19,496,557$Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure) -$ -$ -$ 118,966$ 120,874$122,781$124,689$126,597$128,504$130,412$Compliance Monitoring (Capital + O&M) [1]-$-$-$188,474$288,716$388,959$489,201$589,443$689,686$789,928$Capital Cost-$-$-$88,231$88,231$88,231$88,231$88,231$88,231$88,231$Annual O&M-$-$-$100,242$200,485$300,727$400,969$501,212$601,454$701,697$Yearly Total 44,588,275$44,588,275$44,588,275$15,201,447$17,779,828$20,667,200$23,554,572$26,441,945$29,329,317$32,216,690$StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10Start-Up ActivitiesStart-Up$5,474,876 $5,474,876 $5,474,876-$-$-$-$-$-$-$Annual ActivitiesSanitary Survey-$-$-$ 24,233,777$24,233,777$24,233,777$24,233,777$24,233,777$24,233,777$24,233,777$Triggered Monitoring - Review Report-$-$-$110,775$110,775$110,775$110,775$110,775$110,775$110,775$Corrective Action - Review Plans-$-$-$ 1,491,620$1,491,620$1,491,620$1,491,620$1,491,620$1,491,620$1,491,620$Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation-$-$-$633,179$-$-$-$-$-$-$Compliance Monitoring Report Review (DisinfectionFailure)-$-$-$225,224$228,836$232,448$236,059$239,671$243,282$246,894$Annual Administration-$-$-$ 12,840,165$12,840,165$12,840,165$12,840,165$12,840,165$12,840,165$12,840,165$Yearly Total $5,474,876 $5,474,876 $5,474,876 $39,534,740 $38,905,172 $38,908,783 $38,912,395 $38,916,007 $38,919,618 $38,923,230Sum for PWSs and StatesYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10PWSs44,588,275$44,588,275$44,588,275$15,201,447$17,779,828$20,667,200$23,554,572$26,441,945$29,329,317$32,216,690$States and Territories5,474,876$5,474,876$5,474,876$39,534,740$38,905,172$38,908,783$38,912,395$38,916,007$38,919,618$38,923,230$Yearly Total 50,063,151$50,063,151$50,063,151$54,736,187$56,684,999$59,575,983$62,466,968$65,357,952$68,248,936$71,139,920$Notes:[1] Capital costs are incurred only by systems serving more than 3,300 people, because these systems must purchase equipment to conduct continuous monitoring. O&M costs are incurred by systems of all sizes.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 18December 2011Exhibit G.16ResponsesBurdenHours Labor Costs O&M CostsCapitalCostsTotal AnnualCostsPWSs 897,601 581,601 18,833,784 6,076,243 88,231 24,998,259States and Territories 33,714 738,226 38,914,201 0 0 38,914,201Total 931,315 1,319,827 57,747,985 6,076,243 88,231 63,912,460Note: Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for May 1, 2012 - April 31, 2015.Average Annual Burden per Response and per Respondent and AverageAnnual Responses per RespondentMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 19December 2011Exhibit G.17a - Number of Systems and Entry Points Subject to GWR RequirementsABCD=A E=0 F=A-CGHIJ KL MCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10011,6836,1173,18111,683-8,502-3,0264,223-9,276-4,607101-50013,7379,3064,83913,737-8,898-3,6136,114-10,857-7,460501-1,0004,4633,5591,8514,463-2,612-1,1272,220-4,132-3,5121,001-3,3005,9645,0132,6075,964-3,358-1,3982,994-6,230-5,5563,301-10K3,1082,7361,4233,108-1,686-8341,726-3,697-3,78510,001-50K1,6611,5317961,661-866-4951,009-3,059-3,56650,001-100K19217792192-100-60120-941-1,126100,001-1 Million10410454104-50-2965-627-817> 1 Million5555---05---63Totals40,91828,54814,84740,918- 26,070-10,58118,475-38,820-30,493Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤1008,5712,9018998,571-7,672-2,0801,409-7,672-1,409101-5006,4672,7358486,467-5,619-1,608979-5,619-979501-1,0001,6608722701,660-1,390-413362-1,390-3621,001-3,300763524162763-601-221177-601-1773,301-10K1038326103-77-3228-77-2810,001-50K129312-9-43-9-350,001-100K-------00----100,001-1 Million-------00----> 1 Million-------00----Totals17,5767,1232,20817,576- 15,368-4,3582,957-15,368-2,957Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10059,23813,7931,37959,238- 57,859-16,4581,590-57,859-1,590101-50019,3585,50455019,358- 18,808-5,362624-18,808-624501-1,0001,965700701,965-1,895-54480-1,895-801,001-3,30056824725568-543-17026-543-263,301-10K6628366-63-223-63-310,001-50K6206-6-20-6-050,001-100K3--3-3-10-3--100,001-1 Million-------00----> 1 Million-------00----Totals81,20420,2742,02781,204- 79,177-22,5592,323-79,177-2,323Grand Total139,69855,94519,083139,698- 120,615-37,49823,756- 133,364-35,773Notes:Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.Sources:(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.(B) Systems performing implementation activities multiplied by percent of systems disinfecting.(D) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.(F) Based on rule requirements, systems that do not achieve 4-log disinfection are subject to triggered source water monitoring.(G) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.(K) Number of entry points subject to triggered monitoring is equal to number of systems subject to HSAs (column J).(L) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.(M) (Exhibit G.17b, Columns E+F) + (Exhibit G.4, Column C)(E), (J) Based on rule requirements, systems not required to perform HSAs(C) Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on percentages from AWWA (1998).SystemsPerformingComplianceMonitoringSystemsPerformingImplementationActivitiesSystemsDisinfectingSystemsDisinfecting;4 logEntry PointsPerformingComplianceMonitoringSystemsSubjecttoHSAs(I) Systems treating to 4-log inactivation or removal of viruses must undergo compliance monitoring. Number of systems subject to compliance monitoring is converted from entry points subject to compliance monitoring(column M), using entry points/system.(H) Based on rule requirements, systems found to have significant deficiencies during a sanitary survey, or those that detect source water contamination, must undergo corrective action. Number of systems undergoingcorrective action from model output.System Size(PopulationServed)Entry PointsPerformingTriggeredMonitoringEntry PointsPerformingAssessmentMonitoringSystemsPerformingCorrectiveActionSystemsPerformingTriggeredMonitoringSystemsReceiving aSanitarySurveySystemsPerformingAssessmentMonitoringEntryPointsPerformingHSAsMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 20December 2011Exhibit G.17b - Summary of Rule ImplicationsSystem SizeSystemsReceivingSanitary SurveySystems withCorrectiveActions forSignificantDeficienciesEntry Points withTriggeredMonitoringEntry PointswithCorrectiveActions forTriggeredMonitoringEntry Points with ViralDisinfection Increased fromless than 4 logs to 4 logsPreviously Nondisinfecting Entry PointsTaking Corrective ActionEntry Points withIncrementalCompliance MonitoringA B CD EF GCommunity Water Systems (CWSs)≤10011,6831,98411,6411,137326811225101-50013,7372,33814,1781,555877678279501-1,0004,4637585,3545843462381011,001-3,3005,9641,0108,9927193993201313,301-10K3,1085306,07666538128411910,001-50K1,6612825,0137546301236250,001-100K192331,48826010715353100,001-1 Million10418757137954321> 1 Million5------Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)≤1008,5711,4587,803623136487135101-5006,4671,0985,884510114397163501-1,0001,6602821,51113129102431,001-3,300763129694912071293,301-10K103189414311510,001-50K12211201150,001-100K-------100,001-1 Million-------> 1 Million-------Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)≤10059,23810,10258,1786,3561,0515,3051,473101-50019,3583,29719,0062,0653441,722710501-1,0001,9653341,93021135176741,001-3,30056896558731261253,301-10K6611651029410,001-50K616101050,001-100K3131000100,001-1 Million-------> 1 Million-------Sources:(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2010.(B) - (G): Baseline information from the cost model for the Ground Water Rule was updated by multiplying the percentage of systems or entry points performing each rule component by column A.Notes:(G) Indicates number of entry points with treatment corrective actions.(F) - (G) Indicates non-treatment corrective actions.Microbial Rules ICR - GWRG - 21December 20112008 Burden TaskSystem SizeRevised Burden4.3 hrsSanitary Survey<1004.4 hrs4.3 hrsSanitary Survey101-5004.5 hrs5.4 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,0005.6 hrs4.5 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,0004.6 hrs5.0 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K6.3 hrs5.8 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K13.3 hrs20.5 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M21.0 hrs3.9 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,3004.1 hrs3.3 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K5.0 hrs3.8 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K11.8 hrs20.0 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M20.5 hrs3.5 hrsSanitary Survey<1003.6 hrs3.5 hrsSanitary Survey101-5003.7 hrs4.4 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,0004.5 hrs3.6 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,0003.7 hrs4.3 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K4.8 hrs5.0 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K11.8 hrs2.9 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,3003.1 hrs2.8 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K3.7 hrs3.3 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K10.5 hrs19.0 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M19.2 hrsExhibit G.18Ground Water Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden EstimatesPWSs - TreatedCWSsNTNCWSsTNCWSsPWSs - UntreatedCWSsNTNCWSsTNCWSsMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 22December 20112008 Burden TaskSystem SizeRevised Burden14.8 hrsSanitary Survey<10014.9 hrs14.9 hrsSanitary Survey101-50015.1 hrs18.0 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,00018.1 hrs13.8 hrsSanitary Survey<10013.6 hrs14.2 hrsSanitary Survey101-50014.0 hrs15.6 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,00015.7 hrs15.6 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,30015.9 hrs15.0 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K18.0 hrs15.8 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K28.3 hrs41.3 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M41.8 hrs12.9 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,30014.3 hrs14.1 hrsSanitary Survey3,301-10K15.0 hrs10.8 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K15.1 hrs11.3 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K25.3 hrs33.3 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M34.1 hrs13.9 hrsSanitary Survey<10014.1 hrs14.1 hrsSanitary Survey101-50014.3 hrs16.9 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,00017.0 hrs13.0 hrsSanitary Survey<10012.8 hrs13.5 hrsSanitary Survey101-50013.3 hrs14.8 hrsSanitary Survey501-1,00014.9 hrs14.5 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,30014.9 hrs14.3 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K16.5 hrs15.0 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K26.8 hrs11.9 hrsSanitary Survey1,001-3,30013.3 hrs12.8 hrsSanitary Survey3,301-10K13.7 hrs10.3 hrsSanitary Survey10,001-50K13.8 hrs10.8 hrsSanitary Survey50,001-100K24.0 hrs32.3 hrsSanitary Survey100,001-1M32.8 hrsStates - Treated SystemsCWSsExhibit G.18 cont.Ground Water Rule Summary of Original and Revised Burden EstimatesNTNCWSsTNCWSsStates - Untreated SystemsCWSsNTNCWSsTNCWSsMicrobial Rules ICR - GWRG - 23December 2011

# Appendix H

Aircraft Drinking Water Rule Spreadsheets# of Available SamplingPoints # of AircraftTotal # of AvailableSampling Points # of Onboard Staff/year # of Passengers/yearTotal # of PotentiallyAffected Persons/year# of Air CarriersAB C=B*AD E F=D+EG1290 290 1,507,391 19,028,095 20,535,48621,584 3,169 6,581,069 79,544,742 86,125,8113576 1,728 1,776,407 17,469,862 19,246,2694321 1,283 1,912,510 39,491,976 41,404,4865728 3,641 5,058,927 120,968,400 126,027,3286663 3,981 2,955,080 69,589,691 72,544,7717227 1,589 1,077,787 26,080,621 27,158,4088616 4,930 2,868,163 71,332,691 74,200,854>9575 7,125 3,045,331 96,109,107 99,154,438Total 5,581 27,734 26,782,665 539,615,186 566,397,85147Notes:(B), (D), (E) Updated using new information on totals for each group multiplied by the previous ratio of aircraft or people ineach category to the total number of aircraft or people.(C) Average number of sampling points used for >9 sampling points size category.(D), (E), (F) These numbers are not used to develop cost and burden estimates, but are shown here for informational purposes.(A) Each qualifying lavatory and galley on an aircraft is assumed to have only one sampling point. Therefore, the number of available sampling points is representativeof the number of lavatories and galleys on an aircraft.(G) Aircraft Reporting and Compliance System (ARCS) (2011)Exhibit H.1 - Aircraft and Air Carrier BaselineMicrobial Rules ICR - ADWR H-1 December 2011SOC Code Occupation Mean Hourly WageSOC 11-3071Transportation, Storage, and DistributionManagers $41.65SOC 43-6014Secretaries, Except Legal, Medical, andExecutive $15.83SOC 39-6031 Flight Attendants1$25.84SOC 53-7061 Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment $10.71SOC 53-6051 Transportation Inspectors $30.31SOC 51-9061Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, andWeighers $17.09SOC 53-6099 Transportation Workers $17.31Index ValueCPI Index Multiplier(2006 to 2010)CPI Index Multiplier(2008Q3 to 2010Q2)1.08 1.01Load factor1.5SOC Code Occupation Mean Hourly WageSOC 11-3071Transportation, Storage, and DistributionManagers$62.00SOC 53-7061 Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment$15.94SOC 53-6051 Transportation Inspectors$45.12SOC 51-9061Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, andWeighers$25.44Load factor1.6Loaded Labor Rates for Regional EPA Employee, January 2010GS Level Mean Hourly Wage (Unloaded) Mean Hourly Wage (Loaded)GS 11 - Step 5$27.40 $43.84Exhibit H.2 - Labor Rates by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) Code - 2010$H.2a - Unloaded Labor RatesSource: BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation report, Table 9, June 2010. Allworkers in private industry. Production, transportation, and material moving. Transportation andmaterial moving subsector. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09082010.pdfNote:Source: CPI-U. U.S. City Average, by expenditure category and commodity and service group,All Items, Not Seasonally Adjusted, Annual (1982-1984=100).ManagerialClericalTechnicalSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics Survey, May 2010, http://www.bls.gov/data/.1Flight Attendants - Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2005. Flight attendants' wage data for 2010 not available.H.2b - Loaded Labor RatesSource: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/html/gs.asp).ManagerialTechnicalSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics Survey, May 2010, http://www.bls.gov/data/.g qPaperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Revised November 2005. U.S. EPA Office of EnvironmentalInformation, Collection Strategies Division. p. A-35.Load factor used for Federal Employees.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-2 December 2011Exhibit H.3 - Lab Costs (2010$)Item CostTC Coliform Sample$22.30Disinfectant Residual Sampling Kit$3.00Shipping$108.16Annual Equipment Replacement$221.80One-time Equipment Purchase (3 refrigerators)$604.63Notes:5) Sample analysis costs based on average costs from various EPA certified labs across the U.S.4) Assume 3 refrigerators ($199/refrigerator) purchased per air carrier twice in the 25-year evaluation period. Cost of refrigerator fromwww.homedepot.com.1) Estimated chlorine residual sampling kit costs from www.hach.com ($74 for 25 tests).2) Assume shipping and annual equipment replacement costs are incurred by coliform monitoring. Disinfectant residual samples will be analyzedimmediately and will not require shipping or refrigeration.3) Assume 3 coolers ($33/cooler), 9 gel packs ($4/gel pack), and 2 calibrated thermometers ($42/thermometer) purchased per aircarrier. Cost ofcooler and gel pack from www.coleman.com. Cost of thermometer from https://www1.fishersci.com.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-3 December 2011Exhibit H.4a - Airline Burden for the ICR Approval PeriodActivity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Burden for ICRApproval PeriodAir Carrier Implementation -----Air Carrier Sampling Plan -----Monitoring TC - Air Carriers 5,00230,01230,01221,67565,026O&M Plan- Air Carriers -----Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 6513,9073,9072,8228,465Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 39236236170510Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers 38226226163489Public Notification - Air Carriers 1187077075111,532Total5,84835,08735,08725,34176,022Exhibit H.4b - Agency Burden for the ICR Approval PeriodActivity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Burden for ICRApproval PeriodAgency Implementation-----Agency Annual Administration8605,1605,1603,72711,180Agency Sampling Plan Information Review-----Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight1146876874961,487O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review-----Compliance Audit- Agency25150150109326Total9995,9975,9974,33112,993Notes:(2) Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden andcost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.(3) Five-sixths of the burden for Year 1 in this ICR period is accounted for in the standalone ADWR ICR, as this ICR expires onFebruary 28, 2013.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-4 December 2011Exhibit H.5a - Airline Costs for the ICR Approval PeriodActivityYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Cost for ICRApproval PeriodAir Carrier Implementation -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Air Carrier Sampling Plan -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - Labor 127,247$ 763,483$ 763,483$ 551,404$ 1,654,212$Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - O&M 508,169$ 3,049,013$ 3,049,013$ 2,202,065$ 6,606,195$Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - Capital 526$ 3,158$ 3,158$ 2,280$ 6,841$O&M Plan- Air Carriers -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 16,564$ 99,383$ 99,383$ 71,776$ 215,329$Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 999$ 5,993$ 5,993$ 4,328$ 12,984$Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers 1,696$ 10,179$ 10,179$ 7,351$ 22,053$Public Notification - Air Carriers 7,307$ 43,844$ 43,844$ 31,665$ 94,995$Total662,5083,975,0513,975,0512,870,870$ 8,612,610$Exhibit H.5b - Agency Costs for the ICR Approval PeriodActivityYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Cost for ICRApproval PeriodAgency Implementation-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Agency Annual Administration37,702$ 226,210$ 226,210$ 163,374$ 490,123$Agency Sampling Plan Information Review-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight4,930$ 29,582$ 29,582$ 21,364$ 64,093$O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review-$ -$ -$ -$ -$Compliance Audit- Agency1,099$ 6,593$ 6,593$ 4,762$ 14,286$Total43,731262,385262,385189,501568,502Notes:(2) Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs incurred to implement the ADWR are not included in the total burden for the Microbial Rules ICR but are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR (thePWSS ICR addresses all EPA burden for implementation and oversight of the drinking water program). Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.(3) This ICR includes ADWR burden only for the period following the expiration of the standalone ADWR ICR. The standalone ICR expires on February 28, 2013, just before the end of the first yearof the Microbial Rules ICR clearance period.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-5 December 2011Exhibit H.6a - Airline Respondents for the ICR Approval PeriodActivity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Respondents forICR Approval PeriodAir Carrier Implementation -----Air Carrier Sampling Plan -----Monitoring TC - Air Carriers 4747474747O&M Plan- Air Carriers -----Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 4747474747Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers14747474747Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers 99999Public Notification - Air Carriers 4747474747Total4747474747Exhibit H.6b - Agency Respondents for the ICR Approval Period2Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Respondents forICR Approval PeriodAgency Implementation-----Agency Annual Administration1010101010Agency Sampling Plan Information Review-----Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight1010101010O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review-----Compliance Audit- Agency22222Total1010101010Notes:1EPA estimates that all air carriers subject to ADWR (47 air carriers) will perform corrective actions at least once per year.Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.2This rule is administered by the ten EPA regions, thus there are ten Agency respondents for each active rule component.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-6 December 2011Exhibit H.7a - Airline Responses for the ICR Approval PeriodActivity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Responses forICR Approval PeriodAir Carrier Implementation -----Air Carrier Sampling Plan -----Monitoring TC - Air Carriers 20,062120,371120,37186,934260,803O&M Plan- Air Carriers -----Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers 2,60415,62715,62711,28633,858Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers1316161134Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers 299720Public Notification - Air Carriers 34202202146438Total22,704136,225136,22598,384295,153Exhibit H.7b - Agency Responses for the ICR Approval Period2Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Annual AverageTotal Responses forICR Approval PeriodAgency Implementation-----Agency Annual Administration320201443Agency Sampling Plan Information Review-----Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight2291,3731,3739922,975O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review-----Compliance Audit- Agency299720Total2341,4021,4021,0133,039Note:Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-7 December 2011Compliance ActivityLabor Cost($/hour)One-time labor burden(hours/air carrier) Unit CostTotal Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersRead and Understand Rule $45.12 8361$ 376 16,964$Train Personnel $45.12 8361$ 376 16,964$Total16722$ 752 33,928$Notes:(1) Detail may not add due to rounding.(2) These activities completed prior to this ICR period.Sources:(B) Labor hours for start-up activities are carried forward from the stand-alone ADWR ICR.Exhibit H.8a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation (2010$)(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportationinspectors are assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.(D), (E) National totals for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR to perform implementation activities. Assumes all air carriersspend equal time performing implementationactivities, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-8 December 2011Labor Cost($/hour)One-time labor burden(hours/Region) Unit CostTotal LaborBurden (hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*10 E=C*10Read and Understand Rule $43.84 8351$ 80 3,507$Program Development $43.84 401,754$ 400 17,536$Modify/Develop Data Management Systems $43.84 1155,042$ 1,150 50,415$Air Carrier Training and Technical Assistance $43.84 803,507$ 800 35,071$Staff Training $43.84 401,754$ 400 17,536$Total28312,407$ 2,830124,065$Notes:(2) Detail may not add due to rounding.(3) These activities completed prior to this ICR period.Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.(B) Labor hours for start-up activities carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR.Compliance ActivityExhibit H.8b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation (2010$)(D), (E) National totals for Agency (EPA Regions) to implement ADWR for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. Assumes each regionspends equal time performingimplementation activities, regardless of number of air carriers headquartered in their region, air carrier fleet size or aircraft type.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions.Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-9 December 2011Labor Cost($/hour)Labor(hours/Region/year) Cost ($/year)Total LaborBurden(hours/year)Total Cost ($/year)A B C=A*B D=B*10 E=C*10Lab Certification $43.84 --$ --$Ongoing Technical Assistance $43.84 50021,920$ 5,000 219,196$Staff Training $43.84 16701$ 160 7,014$Total51622,621$ 5,160226,210$Notes:(2) Detail may not add due to rounding.Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.Compliance ActivityExhibit H.8c - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Annual Administrative Activities (2010$)(3) No costs are associated with lab certification under the ADWR because it is not anticipated that the Agency will need to oversee lab certification programs in additionto what is being done for the Total Coliform Rule.(D), (E) National totals for Agency (EPA Regions) to implement ADWR for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. Assumes each regionspends equal time performingimplementation activities, regardless of number of air carriers headquartered in their region, air carrier fleet size or aircraft type.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions.Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-10 December 2011Compliance ActivityLabor Cost($/hour)One-time labor burden(hours/air carrier) Unit CostTotal Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersDevelop Sampling Plan per ADWR requirements andReport Sampling Frequency$45.12 10451$ 470 21,205$Total10451$ 470 21,205$Notes:Sources:Exhibit H.9a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Sampling Plan (2010$)(1) One-time labor burden for sampling plan includes initial submission of air carrier inventory information.(2) These activities completed prior to this ICR period(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportationinspectors are assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.(B) Labor hours for developing sampling plans and reporting sampling frequency reflect EPA estimate. Assumes both disinfectionand flushing frequency and monitoringfrequency will be reported in plan.(D), (E) Assume all U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR will develop sampling plans. Assumes all air carriers spend equal time developing sampling plans, regardless of fleetsize or aircraft type.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-11 December 2011Compliance ActivityLabor Cost($/hour)One-time labor burden(hours/air carrier) Unit CostTotal Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersReview Air Carrier Sampling Plan and Frequency$43.84 4.5197$ 212 9,272$Total4.5197$ 212 9,272$Notes:(2) One-time labor burden for sampling plan includes reviewing initial submission of air carrier inventory information.(3) This activity completed prior to this ICR period.Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.Exhibit H.9b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Sampling Plan (2010$)(D), (E) Assume all U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR will develop sampling plans. Assumes Agency spends equal time reviewing air carrier sampling plans, regardless of fleetsize or aircraft type.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agencyburden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-12 December 2011Exhibit H.10a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Coliform Monitoring (2010$)# of AvailableSampling Points # of AircraftTotal # of AvailableSampling PointsRoutine ColiformMonitoring(samples/year)Routine ColiformMonitoring TC+(samples/year)Additional TC+(samples/year)Repeat(samples/year)Additional RoutineColiform Monitoring(samples/year)Corrective ActionColiform Follow-upSample (postdisinfection sample)(samples/year)Sampling LaborBurden(hours/sample)Total SamplingBurden (hours/year)Total SamplingCost ($/year)A B C=B*A D E=D*0.036F GHI J K=J(D+G+H+I) L=K*AA1290 290 1,915694 72 0 98 0.51,04326,528$21,584 3,169 10,45737622 394 0 535 0.55,693144,823$3576 1,728 3,8011378 143 0 194 0.52,06952,638$4321 1,283 2,116765 80 0 108 0.51,15229,313$5728 3,641 4,80617310 181 0 246 0.52,61766,563$6663 3,981 4,3791589 165 0 224 0.52,38460,645$7227 1,589 1,498543 56 0 77 0.581620,749$8616 4,930 4,0671469 153 0 208 0.52,21456,328$>9575 7,125 3,7961378 143 0 194 0.52,06652,568$Total 5,581 27,734 36,835 1,326 79 1,389 0 1,885 20,054 510,154Notes:(C) Average number of available sampling points used for >9 sampling points size category.(D) One galley and one lavatory TC sample collected per aircraft. Assume 30% of aircraft will sample annually, 30% of aircraftwill sample twice annually, 30% of aircraft will sample quarterly, and 10% of aircraft will sample monthly.(E) Assume 3.6% of coliform samples will be TC+ based on AOC data.(H) Additional routine coliform monitoring not specified, assumed no additional routine coliform monitoring samples collected.(J) Assume 0.5 hour for sample collection and for process, storage, and shipping of sample. (Sample set burden is 1 hour for (2) routine samples, 1.5 hours for (3) repeat samples, and 1 hour for (2) corrective action follow-up samples.)(F) Assume 0% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 0% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routinecoliform monitoring withinitial TC+ sample will perform repeat sampling. Assume 5.7% of aircraft performing repeat sampling will have at least one additional TC+ sample (based on AOC data).(G) Assume 0% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 0% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routinecoliform monitoring with TC+will collect three repeat samples within 24 hours of notification of TC+ as an option to immediate corrective action. Assume aircraft with less than three sampling points collect a total of 300mL of samples from all available sampling points.(I) Assume 100% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 54% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring willcollect 2 follow-up samples per aircraft that undergoes corrective action flushing and disinfecting.TC SamplesTC SamplingMicrobial Rules ICR - ADWR H-13 December 2011Exhibit H.10a cont.Analysis LaborBurden(hours/sample)Total AnalysisBurden(hours/year)Unit Shipping Cost($/sample set)Total Shipping Cost($/year)Unit Analysis Cost($/sample)Total Analysis Cost($/year)Annual UnitEquipment Cost ($/aircarrier/year)Total AnnualEquipment Cost($/year)PeriodicEquipmentCost ($/aircarrier)Total PeriodicEquipment Cost($)M N=M(D+G+H+I) O P=O(D/2+G/3+H+I/2) Q R=Q(D+G+H+I) S T U V0 -$108 111,490$ $22.30 46,515$ 222$ 542$ 605$ 1,478$0 -$108 608,658$ $22.30 253,941$ 222$ 2,959$ 605$ 8,067$0 -$108 221,224$ $22.30 92,298$ 222$ 1,076$ 605$ 2,932$0 -$108 123,195$ $22.30 51,399$ 222$ 599$ 605$ 1,633$0 -$108 279,748$ $22.30 116,715$ 222$ 1,360$ 605$ 3,708$0 -$108 254,875$ $22.30 106,338$ 222$ 1,239$ 605$ 3,378$0 -$108 87,202$ $22.30 36,382$ 222$ 424$ 605$ 1,156$0 -$108 236,733$ $22.30 98,769$ 222$ 1,151$ 605$ 3,138$0 -$108 220,931$ $22.30 92,176$ 222$ 1,074$ 605$ 2,928$0 2,144,055$ 894,533$ 10,425$ 28,418$Notes:(M) Assume all analysis conducted by outside lab.(Q) Average coliform analysis costs based on costs from various labs across the country. Assume all analysis conducted by outside lab.(S) Assume air carriers will replace coolers, gel packs, and thermometers once a year. 100% of the unit equipment cost is incurred by total coliform monitoring.(U) Assume each aircraft will purchase three new refrigerators. 100% of the refrigerator cost is incurred by total coliform monitoring.(V) Refrigerators are purchased by air carriers. Assume costs for airlines are distributed evenly among aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.(O) Estimated courier fees based on costs from various courier services in major cities. Assumed courier services required foreach sample set. (Sample set consists of 2 routine samples, 3 repeat samples, and 2corrective action follow-up samples.) Assumed airport distance of 20-30 miles from lab. Assumed courier would return cooler toair carrier. 100% of shipping costs incurred by TC monitoring.(T) Coolers, gel packs, and thermometers are purchased by air carriers. The costs for this equipment are assumed to be distributed evenly across the 7,327 aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.AnalysisMicrobial Rules ICR - ADWR H-14 December 2011Exhibit H.10a cont.MaintainMaintenance Log(hours/sample set)Report MonitoringResults(hours/sample set)Report Water SystemInventory/Changes(hours/air carrier)Report Water SystemInventory/ChangesBurden (hours/year)Labor Cost($/hour)Recordkeeping andReporting Labor(hours/year)RecordkeepingCost ($/year)Total Burden(hours/year)Total LaborCost ($/year)Total O&M Cost($/year)Total CapitalCost ($)W X Y Z AAAB=((W+X)*(D/2+G/3+H+I/2))+ZAC=AB*AA AD=K+M+AB AE=L+AC AF=P+R+T AG=V0.25 0.25 1.00 2.44 $25.44 51813,173$ 1,56139,701$ 158,547$ 1,478$0.25 0.25 1.00 13.34 $25.44 2,82771,915$ 8,520216,739$ 865,558$ 8,067$0.25 0.25 1.00 4.85 $25.44 1,02726,138$ 3,09778,776$ 314,597$ 2,932$0.25 0.25 1.00 2.70 $25.44 57214,556$ 1,72443,869$ 175,192$ 1,633$0.25 0.25 1.00 6.13 $25.44 1,29933,053$ 3,91699,616$ 397,824$ 3,708$0.25 0.25 1.00 5.59 $25.44 1,18430,115$ 3,56890,759$ 362,453$ 3,378$0.25 0.25 1.00 1.91 $25.44 40510,303$ 1,22131,052$ 124,008$ 1,156$0.25 0.25 1.00 5.19 $25.44 1,10027,971$ 3,31484,299$ 336,652$ 3,138$0.25 0.25 1.00 4.84 $25.44 1,02626,104$ 3,09378,672$ 314,181$ 2,928$47 253,329$ 30,012 763,483$ 3,049,013$ 28,418$Notes:(Z) Assume burden for airlines is distributed evenly across aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.(AA) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.(AB) Columns W and X applied on a sample set basis. Assume a sample set consists of (2) routine samples, (3) repeat samples, and (2) corrective action follow-up samples.Totals(Y) Air carriers were required to report their water system inventory within 18 months of promulgation and are required to update that inventory annually. The initial submission of inventory information was assumed to be submitted aspart of the sampling plan. This burden reflects only the annual inventory updates.RecordkeepingMicrobial Rules ICR - ADWR H-15 December 2011Labor Cost($/hour)Unit labor burden(hours/TC+ sample orair carrier)Unit Cost ($/TC+sample or aircarrier)Total Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D EReview Aircraft Monitoring Results $43.84 0.522$ 66329,066$Review Aircraft Water System Inventory Changes $43.84 0.522$ 24515$Total1.044$ 68729,582$Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.Compliance ActivityTC SamplesExhibit H.10b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Coliform Monitoring (2010$)(D) Total labor burden for reviewing monitoring results = unit labor burden * total number of TC+ samples (Exhibit H.10a). Total labor burden for reviewing inventory = unitlabor burden * # of air carriers.(E) Total cost for reviewing monitoring results = unit cost * total number of TC+ samples (Exhibit H.10a). Total cost for reviewing inventory = unit cost * total burden forreviewing inventory.(F) Air carriers were required to report their water system inventory within 18 months of promulgation and are required to update that inventory annually. The initialsubmission of inventory information was assumed to be submitted as part of the sampling plan. This burden reflects only the annual inventory updates.Note:(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agencyburden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-16 December 2011Compliance ActivityLabor Cost($/hour)One-time Labor Burden(hours/air carrier) Unit CostTotal Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersUpdate existing O&M manual and practices with ADWRspecific requirements and submit statement to Agencyindicating that O&M manual has been updated$45.12 803,609$ 3,760 169,642$Total803,609$ 3,760 169,642$Sources:Exhibit H11.a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for O&M Plan (2010$)(B) Labor hours for developing and implementing O&M plan and submitting verification statement to Agency carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR.(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation inspectorsare assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.(D), (E) U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR developed O&M plans prior to this ICR period. Calculations assume all air carriersspent equal time developing and implementingO&M plan, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-17 December 2011Compliance ActivityLabor Cost($/hour)One-time Labor Burden(hours/air carrier) Unit CostTotal Labor Burden(hours)Total Cost ($)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersReview system submitted statement indicating that O&Mmanual has been updated$43.84 0.522$ 24 1,030$Total0.522$ 24 1,030$Note:(2) This activity completed in the prior ICR period.Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.Exhibit H.11b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for O&M Plan (2010$)(D), (E) All U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR developed O&M plans prior to this ICR period. Calculations assumed all RegionalAgency offices spent equal time reviewing andapproving O&M plan, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.(B) Labor hours for reviewing verification statement carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR. Calculations assumed O&M plan review was completed as part of complianceaudits.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agencyburden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-18 December 2011# of AvailableSampling Points # of AircraftTotal # of AvailableSampling PointsRoutine Disinfectionand Flushing(aircraft/year)Routine Disinfectionand Flushing LaborBurden(hours/aircraft)Unit Disinfection andFlushing Cost($/hour)Unit Chemical Costs($/application)Total RoutineDisinfection andFlushing Costs($/year)Maintain Maintenance Logfor Disinfection ActivitiesBurden (hours/aircraft)Maintain MaintenanceLog for DisinfectionActivities Burden(hours/year)Recordkeeping LaborCost ($/hour)MaintainMaintenance Log forDisinfectionActivities Costs($/year)A B C=B*A D E F G H=(D*E*F)+(D*G) I J=D*I K L=J*K M=(D*E)+J N=H+L1290 290 8135$15.94 1$ $65,651 0.25 20325.44$ 5,168$ 4,26670,819$21,584 3,169 4,4365$15.94 1$ $358,409 0.25 1,10925.44$ 28,213$ 23,290386,622$3576 1,728 1,6125$15.94 1$ $130,268 0.25 40325.44$ 10,254$ 8,465140,522$4321 1,283 8985$15.94 1$ $72,543 0.25 22425.44$ 5,710$ 4,71478,254$5728 3,641 2,0395$15.94 1$ $164,730 0.25 51025.44$ 12,967$ 10,704177,698$6663 3,981 1,8585$15.94 1$ $150,084 0.25 46425.44$ 11,814$ 9,753161,898$7227 1,589 6365$15.94 1$ $51,349 0.25 15925.44$ 4,042$ 3,33755,391$8616 4,930 1,7255$15.94 1$ $139,401 0.25 43125.44$ 10,973$ 9,058150,374$>9575 7,125 1,6105$15.94 1$ $130,096 0.25 40325.44$ 10,241$ 8,454140,336$Total 5,581 27,734 15,627$1,262,5313,90799,383$ 82,041 1,361,914$Notes:(C) Average number of available sampling points used for>9 sampling points size category.(F) Based on costs for cleaners of vehicles and equipment from Exhibit H.2.(G) Chemicals used for disinfection cost approximately $1 per application (based on 12.5% chlorine solution from Harcros Chemicals, which costs $12 per 4 gallon jugs). Inflated to 2010 dollars using CPI multiplier in Labor Rates exhibit.(K) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.No agency burden is incurred for Routine Disinfection and Flushing.(D) Assume 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing quarterly, 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing thrice annually, 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing twice annually, and 10% ofaircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing annually.Routine Disinfection and FlushingExhibit H12.a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Routine Disinfection and Flushing (2010$)(D-H, M-N) These columns are not included in the final burden and cost estimates but are are based on the original cost model for the rule and are included here for completeness.RecordkeepingTotal RoutineDisinfection/FlushingLabor Burden(hours/year)Total O&M Cost($/year)Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-19 December 2011# of AvailableSampling Points # of AircraftTotal # of AvailableSampling PointsUnique CorrectiveAction Disinfectionand Flushing(aircraft/year)Repeat Disinfectionand Flushing(aircraft/year)Corrective ActionDisinfection andFlushing LaborBurden(hours/aircraft)Unit Disinfection andFlushing Cost ($/hour)Unit Chemical Costs($/application)Total Corrective ActionDisinfection and FlushingCosts ($/year)Maintain MaintenanceLog for DisinfectionActivities Burden(hours/aircraft)Maintain MaintenanceLog for DisinfectionActivities Burden(hours/year)RecordkeepingLabor Cost ($/hour)Maintain MaintenanceLog for DisinfectionActivities Costs ($/year)A B C=B*A D E F G H I=((D+E)*(F*G))+(D+E)*H) J K L M=K*L N=((D+E)*F)+K O=I+M1290 290 160 5$15.94 1$ $1,264 0.25 12$25.44 312$ 911,576$21,584 3,169 850 5$15.94 1$ $6,903 0.25 67$25.44 1,701$ 4948,604$3576 1,728 310 5$15.94 1$ $2,509 0.25 24$25.44 618$ 1803,127$4321 1,283 170 5$15.94 1$ $1,397 0.25 14$25.44 344$ 1001,742$5728 3,641 390 5$15.94 1$ $3,173 0.25 31$25.44 782$ 2273,955$6663 3,981 360 5$15.94 1$ $2,891 0.25 28$25.44 712$ 2073,603$7227 1,589 120 5$15.94 1$ $989 0.25 10$25.44 244$ 711,233$8616 4,930 330 5$15.94 1$ $2,685 0.25 26$25.44 662$ 1923,347$>9575 7,125 310 5$15.94 1$ $2,506 0.25 24$25.44 618$ 1793,123$Total 5,581 27,734 301 0$24,3162365,993$ 1,740 30,309$Notes:(C) Average number of available sampling points used for>9 sampling points size category.(E) Assumes first flushing/disinfecting is successful.(G) Based on costs for cleaners of vehicles and equipment from Exhibit H.2.(H) Chemicals used for disinfection cost approximately $1 per application (based on 12.5% chlorine solution from Harcros Chemicals, which costs $12 per 4 gallon jugs). Inflated to 2010 dollars using CPI multiplier in Labor Rates exhibit.(K), (M) Recordkeeping burden and costs based on total number of corrective action disinfection and flushing events + repeat disinfection and flushing events. Total number of corrective action disinfection and flushing events derived from Exhibit H.10a,column I.(L) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.(D-I, N-O) These columns are not included in the final burden and cost estimates but are are based on the original cost model for the rule and are included here for completeness.(D) Assume 100% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 54% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring will perform corrective action disinfection and flushing after a positive routine totalcoliform sample. Assume the remainder of aircraft with a TC+ sample will perform repeat sampling. Assume 5.7% of aircraft performing repeat sampling will have at least one additional TC+ sample and will perform corrective action. Additionally, of the aircraft with routine coliform monitoring coliform TC+ samples, assume 0% of the 100% of aircraft performingannual routine coliform monitoring coliform, 0% of the 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 0%of the 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring will incur costs for corrective action disinfection and flushing. Remainder of aircraft performingcorrective action disinfection and flushing assumed to coordinate schedule with routine disinfection and flushing schedule, andtherefore do not incur separate costs for corrective action disinfection and flushing. Assume entire aircraft flushed if either lavatory or galley has a positive total coliform sample. Assume no more than one TC+ per aircraft.Total Corrective ActionDisinfection/FlushingLabor Burden(hours/year)Total O&M Cost($/year)Exhibit H.12b - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Corrective Action Disinfection and Flushing (2010$)Corrective Action Disinfection and FlushingRecordkeepingMicrobial Rules ICR - ADWR H-20 December 2011# of Available Sampling Points # of AircraftTotal # ofAvailableSampling PointsUnit Labor Cost($/hour)Unit labor burden(hours/air carrier)Total Labor Burden(hours/audit cycle)Total Labor Cost($/audit cycle)AB C=B*AD E F G=D*F1290 290 $45.12 24592,646$21,584 3,169 $45.12 2432014,447$3576 1,728 $45.12 241165,251$4321 1,283 $45.12 24652,924$5728 3,641 $45.12 241476,640$6663 3,981 $45.12 241346,050$7227 1,589 $45.12 24462,070$8616 4,930 $45.12 241255,619$>9575 7,125 $45.12 241165,244$Total 5,581 27,734 1,128 50,893$Sources:TotalsExhibit H.13a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Compliance Audit (2010$)Reporting and Recordkeeping Costs Associated withCompliance Audit of Aircraft PWS(D) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation inspectors are assumed tohave a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.(E) EPA assumes that air carriers already conduct major maintenance checks, which include sanitary survey components, every 5 years for each aircraft. Therefore, with the exception of reportingand recordkeeping burden, no additional costs for sanitary surveys are incurred by air carriers under the ADWR.(F), (G) All aircraft undergo compliance audits once in 5 years. The Agency will review electronic data for all aircraft at theair carrier office site. Fractional costs incurred by aircraft (assuming evendistribution across aircraft of all sizes) are represented in the exhibit for presentation and calculation purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-21 December 2011Labor Cost($/hour)Unit Labor Burden(hours/air carrier)Unit Cost ($/aircarrier)Total Labor Burden(hours/audit cycle)Total Labor Cost($/audit cycle)A B C=A*B D=B*# Air Carriers E=C*# Air CarriersConducting Compliance Audit of Aircraft PWSs $43.84 16701$ 75232,967$Total16701$ 75232,967$Sources:(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.(D), (E) Total burden and O&M costs for conducting compliance audits for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. All aircraft undergo compliance audits once in 5 years.Compliance ActivityExhibit H.13b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Compliance Audit (2010$)Note:(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burdenand cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-22 December 2011Exhibit H.14 - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimate for Public Notification# ofAvailableSamplingPoints# ofAircraftTotal # ofAvailableSampling PointsTotal Number ofAircraftConductingCorrectiveActionAssociated withTC+ SamplesNumber ofUniqueCorrectiveActionsAssociatedwith TC+SamplesPercentage ofAircraftRestrictingPublic AccessFollowing TC+SamplesAircraftConductingPNFollowingTC+ SampleNumber ofRoutineSamplesNumber ofRoutineSamplesPositive forE.coliTotal Number ofAircraftConducting PNLaborBurdenper PNEvent(hours)Total PNBurden(hours)Labor Rate($/hour)Total LaborCost Total CostA B C=B*ADE F G=E*F H I=H*0.0014 J=G+I K L=J*K M N=L*MO=N1290 290 49 16 50% 8 1,9153 11 3.5 37 62.00$ $2,280 $2,28021,584 3,169 267 85 50% 43 10,45715 57 3.5 201 62.00$ $12,446 $12,4463576 1,728 97 31 50% 16 3,8015 21 3.5 73 62.00$ $4,524 $4,5244321 1,283 54 17 50% 9 2,1163 12 3.5 41 62.00$ $2,519 $2,5195728 3,641 123 39 50% 20 4,8067 26 3.5 92 62.00$ $5,721 $5,7216663 3,981 112 36 50% 18 4,3796 24 3.5 84 62.00$ $5,212 $5,2127227 1,589 38 12 50% 6 1,4982 8 3.5 29 62.00$ $1,783 $1,7838616 4,930 104 33 50% 17 4,0676 22 3.5 78 62.00$ $4,841 $4,841>9575 7,125 97 31 50% 16 3,7965 21 3.5 73 62.00$ $4,518 $4,518Total 5,581 27,734 942 301 150 36,835 52 202 707 $43,844 $43,844Note:Sources:(F) EPA assumption. Air carriers that choose to take longer than 72 hours to conduct corrective action must restrict public access and provide public notification.(G) Assumes each aircraft has no more than one TC+ sample.(H) From column D, Exhibit H.10a.(M) Loaded labor rate for transportation, storage, and distribution managers from Exhibit H.2.(K) EPA estimate, based on burden for preparing a Tier 2 public notice in the Public Water System Supervision ICR. Includes time needed to prepare notice for crew, post placard for passengers (whererequired), and report to EPA.Total Coliform-Positive SamplesE. coli-Positive Samples Total PN Burden Total PN Costs(D) Derived from column I, Exhibit H.10a, which calculates number of followup samples following corrective action. Each aircraft with a total coliform-positive sample takes two followup samples aftercompleting corrective action.(I) Percentage of routine samples positive forE. colifrom AOC data. All air carriers with positiveE. colisamples must restrict public access and provide public notification on the affected aircraft. Note thatE. coli-positive repeat samples also trigger the same requirements; however they occur so rarely that they do not significantlyaffect the number of PN events, so they were not included.(J) Note that a sample can be positive for both total coliform andE. coliat the same time. By accounting for each type of sample separately, EPA may be overestimating the number of events requiringpublic notification. However, they must be accounted for separately, because the public notification requirements vary for each.(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculationsshown here are for informational purposes only.(E) From column D, Exhibit H.12b. Includes only those corrective actions that do not overlap with routine disinfection and flushing. Assumes a one-to-one correspondence between corrective action andaircraft.Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-23 December 2011

# Exhibit H.15a - Total Airline Burden Incurred During the First 25 Years After ADWR Promulgation

Year Air Carrier

Implementation Air Carrier

Sampling Plan Monitoring TC -

Air Carriers O&M Plan- Air

Carriers Routine

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Corrective Action

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Self-Inspection

Reporting and

Recordkeeping

Air Carriers Public

Notification

-

Air Carriers

1 376 235

- 1,880

- - - -

2 376 235

- 1,880

- - - -

3

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

4

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

5

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

6

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

7

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

8

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

9

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

10

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

11

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

12

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

13

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

14

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

15

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

16

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

17

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

18

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

19

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

20

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

21

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

22

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

23

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

24

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707

25

- - 30,012

- 3,907 236 226 707



# Total 752 470 690,281 3,760 89,854 5,418 5,189 16,265



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-24 December 2011

# Year Agency

Implementation Agency Annual

Administration Agency Sampling

Plan Information

Review Monitoring - TC

Agency

Oversight O&M Plan

CompletionAgency Review Compliance AuditAgency

1 1,415

- 106

- 12

-

2 1,415

- 106

- 12

-

3

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

4

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

5

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

6

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

7

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

8

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

9

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

10

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

11

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

12

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

13

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

14

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

15

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

16

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

17

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

18

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

19

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

20

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

21

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

22

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

23

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

24

- 5,160

- 687

- 150

25

- 5,160

- 687

- 150



# Total 2,830 118,680 212 15,790 24 3,459



# Note: 

# Exhibit H.15b - Total Agency Burden Incurred During the First 25 Years After ADWR

Promulgation

(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is

directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for

informational purposes only.



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-25 December 2011

# Exhibit H.16a - Total Airline Cost Incurred During First 25 Years After ADWR Promulgatio n

Year Air Carrier

Implementation Air Carrier

Monitoring Plan Monitoring - TC

Air Carriers Labor Monitoring -

TC Air

Carriers O&M Monitoring -

TC Air

Carriers

Capital O&M Plan Air

Carriers Routine

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping

-

Air Carriers Corrective Action

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Self-Inspection

Reporting and

Recordkeeping

Air Carriers Public

Notification -

Air Carriers

1 16,964

$ 10,603 $ - $ - $ - $ 84,821 $ - $ - $ - $ - $

2 16,964

$ 10,603 $ - $ - $ - $ 84,821 $ - $ - $ - $ - $

3

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

4

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

5

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

6

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

7

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

8

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

9

-

$ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

10

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

11

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

12

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

13

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

14

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

15

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

16

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

17

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

18

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

19

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

20

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

21

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

22

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

23

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

24

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

25

- $ - $ 763,483 $ 3,049,013 $ 3,158 $ - $ 99,383 $ 5,993 $ 10,179 $ 43,844 $

Total 33,928 $ 21,205 $ 17,560,098 $ 70,127,296 $ 72,623 $ 169,642 $ 2,285,804 $ 137,834 $ 234,106 $ 1,008,405 $



# Note:

Air carriers conducting monitoring will incur capital costs for refrigerators beginning in years 3. Assumes air carriers will n eed to replace refrigerators every 10 years. As a

modeling assumption, capital costs are evenly distributed across the affected years.



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-26 December 2011

# Year Agency

Implementation Agency Annual

Administration Agency

Monitoring Plan Monitoring -

TC Agency

Oversight O&M Plan

Completion

Agency

Review Compliance

Audit - Agency

1 62,033

$ - $ 4,636 $ - $ 515 $ - $

2 62,033

$ - $ 4,636 $ - $ 515 $ - $

3

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

4

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

5

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

6

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

7

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

8

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

9

-

$ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

10

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

11

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

12

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

13

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

14

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

15

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

16

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

17

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

18

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

19

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

20

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

21

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

22

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

23

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

24

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

25

- $ 226,210 $ - $ 29,582 $ - $ 6,593 $

Total 124,065 $ 5,202,840 $ 9,272 $ 680,375 $ 1,030 $ 151,649 $



# Note: 

# Exhibit H.16b - Total Agency Cost Incurred During First 25 Years After ADWR

Promulgation

(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since

this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculations shown

here are for informational purposes only.



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-27 December 2011

# Exhibit H.17a - Airline Respondents for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation

Year Air Carrier

Implementation Air Carrier

Sampling Plan Monitoring TC -

Air Carriers O&M Plan- Air

Carriers Routine

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Corrective Action

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Self-Inspection

Reporting and

Recordkeeping

Air Carriers Public

Notification

-

Air Carriers

1 

# 23.5

23.5

- 23.5

- - - -

2 

# 23.5 23.5

- 23.5

- - - -

3



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

4



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

5



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

6



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

7



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

8



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

9



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

10



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

11



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

12



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

13



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

14



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

15



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

16



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

17



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

18



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

19



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

20



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

21



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

22



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

23



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

24



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

25



# - - 47

- 47 47 9 47

Total 47 47 47 47 47 47 9 47



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-28 December 2011

# Exhibit H.17b - Agency Respondents for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation

Year Agency

Implementation Agency Annual

Administration Agency

Monitoring Plan Monitoring - TC

Agency

Oversight O&M Plan

Completion

Agency Review Compliance Audit -

Agency

1 5

- 5

- 5

-

2 5

- 5

- 5

-

3

- 10

- 10

- 2

4

- 10

- 10

- 2

5

- 10

- 10

- 2

6

- 10

- 10

- 2

7

- 10

- 10

- 2

8

- 10

- 10

- 2

9

- 10

- 10

- 2

10

- 10

- 10

- 2

11

- 10

- 10

- 2

12

- 10

- 10

- 2

13

- 10

- 10

- 2

14

- 10

- 10

- 2

15

- 10

- 10

- 2

16

- 10

- 10

- 2

17

- 10

- 10

- 2

18

- 10

- 10

- 2

19

- 10

- 10

- 2

20

- 10

- 10

- 2

21

- 10

- 10

- 2

22

- 10

- 10

- 2

23

- 10

- 10

- 2

24

- 10

- 10

- 2

25

- 10

- 10

- 2

Total 10 10 10 10 10 2



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-29 December 2011

# Exhibit H.18a - Airline Responses for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation

Year Air Carrier

Implementation Air Carrier

Sampling Plan Monitoring TC -

Air Carriers O&M Plan- Air

Carriers Routine

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Corrective Action

Disinfection &

Flushing

Recordkeeping -

Air Carriers Self-Inspection

Reporting and

Recordkeeping

Air Carriers Public

Notification

-

Air Carriers

1 

# 47

23.5

- 23.5

- - - -

2 

# 47 23.5

- 23.5

- - - -

3



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

4



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

5



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

6



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

7



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

8



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

9



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

10



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

11



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

12



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

13



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

14



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

15



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

16



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

17



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

18



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

19



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

20



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

21



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

22



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

23



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

24



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

25



# - - 120,371

- 15,627 16 9 202

Total 94 47 2,768,527 47 359,416 360 216 4,647



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-30 December 2011

# Exhibit H.18b - Agency Responses for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation

Year Agency

Implementation Agency Annual

Administration Agency

Monitoring Plan Monitoring - TC

Agency

Oversight O&M Plan

Completion

Agency Review Compliance Audit

-

Agency

1 25

- 23.5

- 23.5

-

2 25

- 23.5

- 23.5

-

3

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

4

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

5

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

6

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

7

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

8

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

9

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

10

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

11

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

12

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

13

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

14

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

15

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

16

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

17

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

18

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

19

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

20

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

21

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

22

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

23

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

24

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

25

- 20

- 1,373

- 9

Total 50 20 47 1,373 47 9



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-31 December 2011

# Exhibit H.19a - Airline Schedul e

Year Air Carrier

Implementation Air Carrier

Monitoring Plan Monitoring - TC

Air Carriers

Labor and O&M Monitoring - TC

Air Carriers

Capital O&M Plan Air

Carriers Disinfection

& Flushing

Routine - Air

Carriers Flushing

Corrective

Action - Air

Carriers SelfInspections Air

Carriers Public

Notification

1 50% 50% 50%

2 50% 50% 50%

3 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

4 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

5 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

6 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

7 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

8 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

9 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

10 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

11 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

12 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

13 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

14 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

15 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

16 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

17 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

18 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

19 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

20 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

21 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

22 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

23 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

24 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%

25 100% 11% 100% 100% 20% 100%



# Note: Air carriers conducting monitoring will incur capital costs for refrigerators beginning in years 3. Assumes air carriers will need to replace

refrigerators every 10 years. As a modeling assumption, capital costs are evenly distributed across the affected years.



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-32 December 2011

# Exhibit H.19b - Agency Schedul e

Year Agency

Implementation Agency Annual

Administration Agency

Monitoring Plan Monitoring - TC

Agency

Oversight O&M Plan

Agency Review Compliance

Audit

Agency

1 50% 50% 50%

2 50% 50% 50%

3 100% 100% 20%

4 100% 100% 20%

5 100% 100% 20%

6 100% 100% 20%

7 100% 100% 20%

8 100% 100% 20%

9 100% 100% 20%

10 100% 100% 20%

11 100% 100% 20%

12 100% 100% 20%

13 100% 100% 20%

14 100% 100% 20%

15 100% 100% 20%

16 100% 100% 20%

17 100% 100% 20%

18 100% 100% 20%

19 100% 100% 20%

20 100% 100% 20%

21 100% 100% 20%

22 100% 100% 20%

23 100% 100% 20%

24 100% 100% 20%

25 100% 100% 20%



# Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR H-33 December 2011