alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2365. Amount of indemnity

The indemnity obligation of the Commission specified in section 2363 of this title shall be for such amount, less the sales price of the property, as would have remained unpaid under a loan entered into on the date of the execution of the original deed by the Commission—

(1) which was in the amount of the purchase price from the Commission and provided for equal monthly payments of principal and interest over a period of twenty years computed on the basis of the average interest and other charges recorded for property of the same class at the community; and

(2) on which all payments due to the date when notice was received by the Commission had been made.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 6, §65, 69 Stat. 479.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2579 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2579

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone (EK179).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-Chloro-1-indanone (EK179).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-CHLORO-1-INDANONE (EK179).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.07.47      5-Chloro-1-         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         indanone (CAS No.                                                  31/2009
                         42348-86-7)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2914.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH

OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

Gordon

&

Rees L

L

P

2

75 B

attery

Street, S

uite 2

0

0

0

S

a

n

Fra

ncisco, C

A 94111

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GORDON ERSPAMER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LONG

TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR

ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR A

PROTECTIVE ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Administrative Motion for Sur-Reply

and for Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order (“Defendant’s

Administrative Motion”). The Court, Magistrate Judge Larson presiding, having considered the

parties’ respective briefs, and the supporting declarations and exhibits, hereby orders that

Defendant’s Administrative Motion be GRANTED.

The Court grants Defendant the opportunity to file a Sur-Reply in Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order (“Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash”). Such Sur-

///

///

PRU/1054181/8073555v.1

Case 3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document 106 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104 Filed06/18/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH

OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

Gordon

&

Rees L

L

P

2

75 B

attery

Street, S

uite 2

0

0

0

S

a

n

Fra

ncisco, C

A 94111

2

Reply must be filed no later than June 28, 2010. Additionally, the Court grants Defendant’s

request for oral argument at the hearing on June 30, 2010 on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June ______, 2010

James Larson

United States Magistrate Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document 106 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104 Filed06/18/10 Page2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4359 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonyl chloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzenesulfonyl chloride 

(CAS No. 98–09–9) (provided for in subheading 

2904.10.08) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4359 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2564 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

qualified tuition deduction at the 2005 levels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. FORD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the qualified tuition deduction at the 2005 levels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RE4 LATED EXPENSES MADE PERMANENT. 

5 (a) REPEAL OF TERMINATION.—Section 222 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 subsection (e). 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subparagraph (B) 

9 of section 222(b)(2) of such Code is amended— 
2 

•HR 2564 IH 

1 (1) by striking ‘‘2004 or 2005’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2004 or thereafter’’, and 

3 (2) in the heading by striking ‘‘and 2005’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘and thereafter’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2005. 

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08-CV-04170 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 

BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

19800 MACARTHUR BLVD. 

EIGHTH FLOOR 

IRVINE, CA 92612 

(949) 757-2800 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

CORA J. WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, and DOES 

1 – 50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 08-CV-04170 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TRIAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT 

DATES

[Lodged Concurrently With: 

- Stipulation] 

Complaint Filed: May 30, 2008 

Case 3:08-cv-04170-SI Document 66 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08-CV-04170 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TRIAL AND CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 

1 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 

19800 MACARTHUR BLVD. 

EIGHTH FLOOR 

IRVINE, CA 92612 

(949) 757-2800 

The parties having stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that the case management and 

trial dates are re-set as follows: 

EVENT [PROPOSED]

NEW DATE 

Initial Expert Designation: May 31, 2010 

Discovery Cut-off: July 26, 2010 

Last day to file and serve Summary Adjudication Motions: August 13, 2010 

MSA Opposition Briefs: August 27. 2010 

MSA Reply Briefs: September 3, 2010 

Hearing on Summary 

Adjudication Motions: September 17, 2010 

Pre-Trial Conference: October 19, 2010 

Trial: November 2010 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________ 

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:08-cv-04170-SI Document 66 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

142043

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142043 COA: 292567 Wayne CC: 08-017412-FH REGINALD TIGGLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2493 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2493

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Glyoxylic Acid 50%.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Glyoxylic Acid 50%.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID 50%.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Glyoxylic Acid 50%  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 79-14-1)                                                  31/2008
                         (provided for in
                         2918.30.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the " Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 21, 2005                         By:    /s/ Carmine N. Stella
                                                         ---------------------
                                                  Name:  Carmine N. Stella
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the " Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of
the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 21, 2005                         By:    /s/ Carol Russell
                                                         -----------------
                                                  Name:  Carol Russell
                                                  Title: Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlton Johnson, Appellant.

(Appeal No.1.)

[715 NYS2d 674]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.
§ 19.7-6 Duration and precedence of spousal agreements. ( a ) A spousal agreement may be revised or voided by agreement of the parties (by filing a new agreement under this section) at any time prior to the last day for filing an agreement determined in accordance with § 19.7-2 or § 19.7-3, except spousal agreements for additional survivor annuities are irrevocable. After the last day for filing a particular agreement, such agreement is irrevocable.
( b ) A valid spousal agreement entered into subsequent to the issuance of a court order affecting the same parties will override the court order, and shall govern payments from the Fund.
( c ) A spousal agreement may not override a previous spousal agreement involving the same principal but a different spouse or former spouse without agreement of such spouse or former spouse.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of C.M. and D.M., child ren

, * From the 42nd District Court

of Coleman County,

Trial Court No. CV22

- 01099

.

No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 009

- C V * June 27 , 20 2 4

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFF POKORNY; et al.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

DENNIS OBADO,

Objector

- Appellant,

v.

QUIXTAR, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 13

- 17141

D.C. No. 3:07

- cv

- 00201

- SC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 5, 2016 **

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges and GARBIS, *** District

Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Marvin J. Gar bis, District Judge for the United States

District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUL 7 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Dennis Obado appeals from a district court order denying his motion to be

reinstated as a class member after he had previously opted out. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. While there may be c ircumstances where equity requires a district court

to allow a person to rejoin a class after opting out, this is not such a case. Obado’s

motion to rejoin the class was filed more than nine months after the opt

- out

deadline and more than two months after the second claims deadline. His excuse

for that late filing

— that he never received the January 13 claims notice

— was

contradicted by the claims administrator’s representations that the notice was

mailed to Obado’s address and not returned as undeliverable. Under these

circumstances, the district court was well within its discretion in denying Obado’s

motion.

2. Obado’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not cognizable. Such a

claim does not exist in the civil context. Even if it did exist, it would lack merit

here. Class counsel did not represent Obado during the relevant proceedings.

AFFIRMED.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1345

LT Case No. 2023-CA-114

_____________________________

NAZARIO VAZQUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County.

Michelle T. Morley, Judge.

Nazario Vazquez, Bushnell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. 

Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 24, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.52 Post records of visa applications. ( a ) *Waiting list.* Records of individual visa applicants entitled to an immigrant classification and their priority dates shall be maintained at posts at which immigrant visas are issued. These records shall indicate the chronological and preferential order in which consideration may be given to immigrant visa applications within the several immigrant classifications subject to the numerical limitations specified in INA 201, 202, and 203. Similar records shall be kept for the classes specified in INA 201(b)(2) and 101(a)(27) (A) and (B) which are not subject to numerical limitations. The records which pertain to applicants subject to numerical limitations constitute “waiting lists” within the meaning of INA 203(e)(3) as redesignated by the Immigration Act of 1990.
( b ) *Entitlement to immigrant classification.* An alien shall be entitled to immigrant classification if the alien: ( 1 ) Is the beneficiary of an approved petition according immediate relative or preference status;
( 2 ) Has satisfied the consular officer that the alien is entitled to special immigrant status under INA(101)(a)(27) (A) or (B);
( 3 ) Is entitled to status as a Vietnam Amerasian under section 584(b)(1) of section 101(e) of Public Law 100-202 as amended by Public Law 101-167 and re-amended by Public Law 101-513; or
( 4 ) Beginning in FY-95, is entitled to status as a diversity immigrant under INA 203(c).
( c ) *Record made when entitlement to immigrant classification is established.* ( 1 ) A record that an alien is entitled to an immigrant visa classification shall be made whenever the consular officer is satisfied—or receives evidence—that the alien is within the criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) A separate record shall be made of family members entitled to derivative immigrant status whenever the consular officer determines that a spouse or child is chargeable to a different foreign state or other numerical limitation than the principal alien. The provisions of INA 202(b) are to be applied as appropriate when either the spouse or parent is reached on the waiting list.
( 3 ) A separate record shall be made of a spouse or child entitled to derivative immigrant status whenever the consular officer determines that the principal alien intends to precede the family.
[56 FR 51174, Oct. 9, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 1836, Jan. 24, 1996; 78 FR 31399, May 24, 2013]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





I, Cindy Lea Gimler, Chief Financial Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                1.      The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
                        the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully
                        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m); and

                2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.



August 15, 2006


                                                  /s/ Cindy Lea Gimler
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Name: Cindy Lea Gimler
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Decision MakingDecision Making SkillsFamily School RelationshipParent ParticipationParent Teacher CooperationParentsParticipative Decision MakingPartnerships in EducationPreschool EducationResource MaterialsStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - September 2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 9/3/12 9/10/12 9/17/12 9/24/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units**  **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 4.15 3.47 2.81 1.47

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD = limit of detection = 0.0250 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 9/10/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 9/10/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 090000648119dff4:Sheet1 1/3/2013 2:20 PM