alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3057k–11. Program

#### (a) In general

The Assistant Secretary shall carry out a program for making grants to tribal organizations with applications approved under parts A and B, to pay for the Federal share of carrying out tribal programs, to enable the tribal organizations to provide multifaceted systems of the support services described in section 3030s–1 of this title for caregivers described in section 3030s–1 of this title.

#### (b) Requirements

In providing services under subsection (a), a tribal organization shall meet the requirements specified for an area agency on aging and for a State in the provisions of subsections (c), (d), and (f) of section 3030s–1 of this title and of section 3030s–2 of this title. For purposes of this subsection, references in such provisions to a State program shall be considered to be references to a tribal program under this part.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, §631, as added Pub. L. 106–501, title VI, §604(3), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2288; amended Pub. L. 116–131, title II, §217(d), Mar. 25, 2020, 134 Stat. 262.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 631 of Pub. L. 89–73 was renumbered section 641 and is classified to section 3057l of this title.

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–131 substituted "(c), (d), and (f)" for "(c), (d), and (e)".
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Salvatore Iannuzzi,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
|        | By:    | /s/ Salvatore Iannuzzi |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   |                   |  Salvatore  Iannuzzi |
|   |   |                   |  Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                   |  Dated:  August 9, 2007 |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and willbe retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER RE CLARIFICATION OF RECORD 

BRAD W. SEILING (Bar No. CA 143515)

DONALD R. BROWN (Bar No. CA 156548) 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

11355 West Olympic Boulevard 

Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 

Telephone: (310) 312-4000 

Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 

E-mail: bseiling@manatt.com; dbrown@manatt.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

CashCall, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KRISTA O’DONOVAN and EDUARDO 

DE LA TORRE, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CASHCALL, INC., a California 

corporation, and DOES 1 through DOE 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 08-03174 MEJ 

JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE TIME TO 

RESPOND TO ORDER RE 

CLARIFICATION OF RECORD 

Hon. Maria-Elena James 

Case 3:08-cv-03174-TSH Document 307 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 2
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER RE CLARIFICATION OF RECORD 

Plaintiffs Eduardo De La Torre and Lori Kemply f/k/a Saysourivong (“Plaintiffs”) and 

defendant CashCall, Inc. (“CashCall”), by and through their counsel, request a two-week 

extension to and including December 23, 2015, of the time to respond to the Order Re: 

Clarification of Record (“Order”). The parties request this continuance because, while they have 

discussed the issues in the Order, they have not been able to meet and confer in person, due to the 

Thanksgiving holiday and other scheduling issues. The parties have scheduled an in person meet 

and confer for this Friday December 11 in San Francisco. 

Dated: December 7, 2015 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP

By: /s/ Brad W. Seiling 

Brad W. Seiling 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CashCall, Inc.

Dated: December 7, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF ARTHUR D. LEVY

By: /s/ Arthur D. Levy 

Arthur D. Levy 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Krista O’Donovan and Eduardo De La Torre

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT REQUEST, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December __, 2015 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

United States Magistrate Judge

203311694.1 

8

Case 3:08-cv-03174-TSH Document 307 Filed 12/08/15 Page 2 of 2
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE GUND III,

Plaintiff,

    v.

PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP.,

Defendant.                                                                       /

No. C 07-04902 TEH       C 08-03795 TEH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this cause,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however,

that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy to opposing

counsel, within ninety (90) days from the date of this order, that the agreed consideration for said

settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall

forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 08/23/10                                                                            THELTON E. HENDERSONUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-03795-TEH   Document 35   Filed 08/23/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T19:19:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4357 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Nitroanthraquinone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Nitroanthraquinone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1-NITROANTHRAQUINONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.41.01 1-Nitro-9,10- 

anthracenedione (CAS No. 

82–34–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2914.70.40) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2016 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4357 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
steam_record - Re: ICR Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. 

Sincerely, 

-

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com>

Date: 7/13/2010 6:07 AM

Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: ICR Extension Request.PDF

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3C0293DO... 8/24/2011
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                           SABRE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                                      2000
                                                                                    ---------
<S>                                                                                 <C>
EARNINGS:
   Earnings before taxes                                                            $ 291,765
   Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries                                    (23,451)
   Income from equity investees                                                       (15,329)
                                                                                    ---------
   Earnings before taxes, minority interests and earnings from equity investees       252,985
   Add:  Total fixed charges (per below)                                               30,622
         Distributed income of equity investees                                         6,979
                                                                                    ---------
      Total earnings                                                                $ 290,586
                                                                                    =========
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expensed                                                                $  15,813
   Estimate of interest within rental expense (1)                                      14,809
                                                                                    ---------
      Total fixed charges                                                           $  30,622
                                                                                    =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                       9.49
                                                                                    =========
</TABLE>

---------
(1)    Fixed charges include the estimated interest component of rent expense
       (one-third of rent expense under operating leases).
### §3934. Board of Directors; membership; appointment; term

The corporation shall have a board of directors (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "board"), consisting of fifteen members. Three members of the board shall be appointed by the President of the United States, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, effective on the date on which the other members are elected, and for terms of three years or until their successors have been appointed and have qualified, except that the first three members of the board so appointed shall continue in office for terms of one, two, and three years, respectively, and any member so appointed to fill a vacancy shall be appointed only for the unexpired term of the director whom he succeeds. Twelve members of the board shall be elected by the stockholders.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title IX, §904, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 547.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6928

BRIAN MATTHEW TRACEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-495-JFM)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Matthew Tracey, Appellant Pro Se. David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2467 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fine animal hair of Kashmir 

(cashmere) goats. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. SIMMONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fine animal 

hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINE ANIMAL HAIR OF KASHMIR (CASHMERE) 

4 GOATS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.15.16 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 fine animal hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2467 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT E.L.A., JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3562 ) M.F.M., ) ) Appellee. ) 

### ) Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Carl C. Hinson, Judge. E.L.A., pro se. Lawrence J. Hodz of Cortes Hodz Family Law & Mediation, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., and GENTILE, GEOFFREY H., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–011 2011

112th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–52 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT 

TO CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS IS TO CONTINUE FOR ONE 

YEAR BEYOND SEPTEMBER 14, 2011, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 

1622(d) 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2011.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 

1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the 

President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the 

Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I 

have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that 

the emergency declared with respect to the terrorist attacks on the 

United States of September 11, 2001, is to continue in effect for an 

additional year. 

The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 

2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have 

determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2011, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 9, 2011. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 

50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 

7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 

and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the 

United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency 

declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities 

adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2011. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for 

an additional year the national emergency that was declared on 

September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 9, 2011. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0547 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM028AD

727 - 53A0124, R2 --- 5/2/75

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### Howard J. Williams et al., Respondents, v Osvaldo Panetta, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action *inter alia*to compel the defendant Osvaldo Panetta to construct a new sewer line within the easement contained in a certain recorded deed, the said defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 20, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, directed him to construct, at his own expense, a new and properly graded sewer line, in accordance with appropriate health and building department requirements, within the easement contained in the deed, and to restore the surface of the ground to substantially the same condition as it now exists. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. When the plaintiffs-respondents purchased their property, they were not under a duty to ascertain whether their sewer line actually ran within the confines of the easement, as it traversed the properties of the defendants. Accordingly, since appellant was responsible for constructing the sewer line outside of the easement, he should bear the expense of relaying it so as to coincide with the said easement. It is irrelevant that the easement across appellant’s parcel was recorded after the line was placed. It was clearly an inadvertence on appellant’s part that the easement was not made to coincide with the actual course of the sewer. In view of this, plaintiffs should not be made to suffer a loss of a valuable property right. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7221

ROCKY DEE HINES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-2054-H) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Rocky Dee Hines, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rocky Dee Hines seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hines v. Beshears , No. CA-98-2054-H (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED