alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998              
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     304,732
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     5,049,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,405,069
<PP&E>                          1,803,011
<DEPRECIATION>                    272,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,038,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,287,247
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                           500
<COMMON>                              400
<OTHER-SE>                      2,738,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,038,631
<SALES>                         5,584,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,584,256
<CGS>                           4,892,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,892,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 12,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   136,774
<INCOME-TAX>                       20,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               116,574
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      116,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .03
        

</TABLE>
#### Mark Kyler, Respondent, v. United States Trotting Assoc., Appellant.

— Motion granted and order dismissing appeal vacated, and appeal added to calendar of October 1960 Term.
#### § 3a.6 Notification of approval.

The Director, Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs, will notify the Secretary concerned when an applicant's proposed foreign government employment is approved. Notification of approval to the applicant will be made by the Secretary concerned or his designee.
### §1881a. Alan T. Waterman Award

#### (a) Establishment; amounts; terms

The National Science Foundation is authorized to establish the Alan T. Waterman Award for research or advanced study in the mathematical, physical, medical, biological, engineering, behavioral, social, or other sciences. The award authorized by this section shall consist of a suitable medal and a grant to support further research or study by the recipient. The National Science Board will periodically establish the amounts and terms of such grants under this section.

#### (b) Purpose

Awards under this section shall be made to recognize and encourage the work of younger scientists whose capabilities and accomplishments show exceptional promise of significant future achievement.

#### (c) Number

Not more than three awards may be made under this section in any one fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 94–86, §6, Aug. 9, 1975, 89 Stat. 430; Pub. L. 96–516, §22(b), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3010; Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §109(g), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 890; Pub. L. 105–207, title II, §202(b), July 29, 1998, 112 Stat. 874; Pub. L. 110–69, title VII, §7015(c), Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act, 1976, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–69 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "No more than one award shall be made under this section in any one fiscal year."

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–207 substituted "social," for "social, social,".

1985—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–159 substituted provisions requiring the National Science Board to periodically establish amounts and terms of grants, for provisions limiting the grant awarded to $50,000 per year for a period not exceeding three years.

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–516 inserted ", behavioral, social" after "engineering".
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Wissenfeld, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated August 8, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered November 10, 1953, on his plea of guilty, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and sentencing him, as a third felony offender, to serve a term of 15 to 20 years. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [CGD13-04-043]
          - RIN 1625-AA00

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Final rule; notice of suspension of enforcement.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Captain of the Port, Portland, OR, will suspend enforcement of the Large Passenger Vessel Security and Safety Zones that were created by a final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 12, 2003. The zones provide for the security and safety of large passenger vessels in the navigable waters of Portland, OR, and adjacent waters. Enforcement of these security and safety zones will be suspended until further notice.                    

# DATES:

Enforcement of 33 CFR 165.1318 will be suspended commencing December 8, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

LTjg B. Audirsch, c/o Captain of the Port Portland, OR 6767 North Basin Avenue, Portland, OR 97217 at (503) 247-4015 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On September 12, 2003, the Coast Guard published a final rule (68 FR 53677) establishing regulations in 33 CFR 165.1318 for the security and safety of large passenger vessels in the navigable waters of Portland, OR, and adjacent waters, of Oregon and Washington. These security and safety zones provide for the regulation of vessel traffic in the vicinity of certain large passenger vessels (as defined in 33 CFR 165.1318(b)) and exclude persons and vessels from the immediate vicinity of these large passenger vessels. Entry into these zones is prohibited unless otherwise exempted or excluded under 33 CFR 165.1318 or unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designee. The Captain of the Port, Portland, OR, will suspend enforcement of the Large Passenger Vessel Safety and Security Zones established in 33 CFR 165.1318 on December 8, 2004.

Dated: December 8, 2004.

Paul D. Jewell,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland, OR.

[FR Doc. 04-27897 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Proposed Order Granting Notice of Withdrawal of 

Bradford J. Black as Counsel for RIM 

 Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW 

Linda S. DeBruin 

(Admitted to this Court on September 27, 1991) 

Aaron D. Charfoos (pro hac vice) 

Meredith Zinanni (pro hac vice) 

Maria A. Maras (pro hac vice) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

300 North LaSalle 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Telephone: (312) 862-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 

Email: linda.debruin@kirkland.com 

Email: aaron.charfoos@kirkland.com 

Email: meredith.zinanni@kirkland.com 

Email: maria.maras@kirkland.com 

Marc H. Cohen (CA Bar No. 168773) 

Bradford J. Black (CA Bar No. 252031) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

P.O. Box 51827 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 859-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 859-7500 

Email: marc.cohen@kirkland.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and 

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW 

Delaware corporation, 

 Jury Trial Demanded 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, a BRADFORD J. BLACK AS COUNSEL 

Canadian corporation FOR RIM 

AND 

 

RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 

Case 3:08-cv-04990-EMC Document 286 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Proposed Order Granting Notice of Withdrawal of 

Bradford J. Black as Counsel for RIM 

 Case No. 5:08-CV-04990-JW 

 Having considered the request for withdrawal of Bradford J. Black of Kirkland & Ellis LLP 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 

 Bradford J. Black be relieved and granted withdrawal from the above-captioned matter as 

counsel for Defendant RIM, and be removed from receiving electronic notification of e-filings in 

connection with this defendant. 

 

DATED: ___________ By______________________________ 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Court Judge 

August 11, 2010 

Case 3:08-cv-04990-EMC Document 286 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40636 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J OR GE ORTI Z- ESQU I VEL D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 7: 08- C R
- 115- 1 B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F e d e r a l P u b lic D e fe n d e ra p p o in te d t o re p r e s e n t J o r g e O r tiz -E s q u iv e l has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 86 U . S. 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . O r t i z - Esq ui vel h as f i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i n dep en den trevi ew of t h e rec ord, coun sel ’ s bri ef, an d O rt i z- E squ i vel ’ s r espon se di scl oses n o non f

rivol o u s i ssue f

or app eal . A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40636

2 h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 4 2 .2 . O r t iz -E s q u iv e l’s mo t i o n f

o rt h e a p p o i n t me n to f c o u n s e li s DE NI ED .
#### In the Matter of Willis M. Weeden, Appellant, v. Solomon E. Senior, as Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order entered on June 15, 1960, denying petitioner’s motion to compel respondent to comply with the duty enjoined upon respondent by section 75 of the Civil Service Law unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ. [24 Misc 2d 333.]
Exhibit  99.1

                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Fleetclean Systems Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I,
Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer an principal financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Kenneth  A.  Phillips
Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
November 14,2002


                                       11
<PAGE>
Your Right

to Get Information

AboutReturning

to theCommunity

You have the right to learn if 

you can live in the community 

and get the services and supports 

you need. 

Local Contact Agency:

(if you prefer to call them yourself) 

Nursing Home Social Worker/

Discharge Planner: 

Your Local Ombudsman (Resident 

Advocate): 

CMS Product No. 11477 

October 2010
Why does the nursing home staff 

ask me if I want to talk to someone 

about returning to the community? 

The nursing home staff is required to ask you 

questions about your care. One question they will 

ask is, “Do you want to talk to someone about the 

possibility of returning to the community?” Saying 

“yes” tells the staff you want more information. 

It doesn’t mean you have to leave the nursing home.

The staff will regularly ask this question, since your 

needs and the services available in the community 

may change over time. 

What will happen if I ask to speak 

with someone about returning 

to the community? 

1. The nursing home staff will call a local agency 

for community living (Local Contact Agency).

2. The Local Contact Agency will call or visit you 

to learn what services and supports you need. 

Then, they’ll look into:

– Your housing options 

and/or home 

modification services. 

– Available services such 

as help with your 

medical and personal 

care. 

– Programs that may 

help pay for these 

services (like Medicaid, 

Medicare, or private 

insurance). 

3. If the services and 

supports you need are 

available, you decide 

whether or not to start the 

plan to leave the nursing home. 

4. You can change your mind at any time.
### §2610b. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–203, title VII, §714, formerly title VI, §614, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 883; renumbered title VII, §714, Pub. L. 93–567, title I, §101, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1845

Section, Pub. L. 87–415, title II, §251, as added Pub. L. 89–792, §6(a), Nov. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 1436; amended Pub. L. 90–636, §1(3), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1352, made provision for experimental training programs for persons in correctional institutes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 93–203, title VII, §714, formerly title VI, §614, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 883; renumbered title VII, §714, Pub. L. 93–567, title I, §101, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1845, provided that the repeal is effective with respect to fiscal years after June 30, 1974.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         145,180
<SECURITIES>                                 2,788,430
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,677,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                   221,818
<INVENTORY>                                    899,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,805,678
<PP&E>                                       1,634,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                 356,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,381,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          711,010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,240,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,414,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,381,260
<SALES>                                      3,770,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,770,326
<CGS>                                        2,440,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,440,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                70,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (504,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (236,280)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (268,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (268,325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
        

</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ECOPY, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 08-04227 JSW

No. C 08-04942 JSW

ORDER ADOPTING

RECOMMENDATION OF

SPECIAL MASTER TO ADJUST

SCHEDULE

The Court has reviewed Special Master Meredith Martin Addy’s Recommendation to

adjust the schedule and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the

scheduling dates as set forth in the Recommendation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-04942-JSW Document 117 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
Coal Development
Potential Areas

WB Unsuitable Coal Lands

T
23
N
83 |R82W 81 80
22
{+
21

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

0054

4 6
Kilometers
2 3

Miles

Map A2-2

Unsuitable Lands within
Coal Development Potential
### §4452. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–24, §7, Apr. 20, 1973, 87 Stat. 25

Section, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §232, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1753, provided for emergency farm loans. See section 1961 of Title 7, Agriculture.
August 31, 2016

U.S. Department of T

ransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Amendment to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket NO. FAA-2015-0173

Dear Sir or Madam:

Alaska Aerial Media LLC. was issued an Exemption numbered 11426 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of aerial cinematography and videography

, as well as implementation of emergency use UAS systems with public entities. Alaska Aerial Media requests an amendment to the exemption to allow for the use of UAS aircraft over the weight of 55lbs operation for in aerial data collection and closed set motion picture applications with an additional aircraft we would like to add the Shotover U1 to our list of approved aircraft.

Attached is the Shotover U1 card showing its max takeoff weight with payload at 66lbs.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Ryan P

. Marlow Alaska Aeria l Media 7960 Upper O Malley Road Anchorage Alaska 99507 T el e : ( 9 07 )-717-9794
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, H. Dean Cubley, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB"), that the Form 10-QSB fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERF
Wireless, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-QSB.

     DATED: NOVEMBER 20, 2006               BY: /s/ Dr. H. Dean Cubley
                                                --------------------------------
                                                DR. H. DEAN CUBLEY
                                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
### §4157. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–480, §7, as added Pub. L. 94–541, title II, §201(7), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2508; amended Pub. L. 103–437, §15(n), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4593, which required the Administrator of General Services to report to Congress during the first week of January of each year on his activities and those of other departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government under this chapter during the preceding fiscal year and required the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board established by section 792 of title 29 to report to the Public Works and Transportation Committee of the House of Representatives and the Environment and Public Works Committee of the Senate during the first week of January of each year on its activities and actions to insure compliance with the standards prescribed under this chapter, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, item 6 on page 155 and item 10 on page 173 of House Document No. 103–7.