alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§290aa–12 to 290aa–14. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §120(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 358

Section 290aa–12, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §509E, as added Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2053, 102 Stat. 4208; amended Aug. 16, 1989, Pub. L. 101–93, §3(c), 103 Stat. 610; Aug. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–374, §2(a)–(c)(2), 104 Stat. 456, related to reduction of waiting periods for drug abuse treatment.

Section 290aa–13, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §509F, as added Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2054, 102 Stat. 4209, related to model projects for pregnant and post partum women and their infants.

Section 290aa–14, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §509G, as added Nov. 18, 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2055, 102 Stat. 4210; amended Aug. 16, 1989, Pub. L. 101–93, §3(d), 103 Stat. 610, related to drug abuse demonstration projects of national significance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1992, with provision for programs providing financial assistance, see section 801(c), (d) of Pub. L. 102–321, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 236 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                                      5

<S>                                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                 9,698,706
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          2,478,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      14,315,176
<PP&E>                                                                90,087,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         8,404,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       126,442,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  8,225,806
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  168
<COMMON>                                                                 118,833
<OTHER-SE>                                                            47,848,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         126,442,271
<SALES>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      39,434,842
<CGS>                                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         14,716,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     4,581,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        3,899,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           1,902,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    1,863,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            53,244
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           1,916,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .11



</TABLE>
TP 7245E

1 of 1 

AD Number: CF-2015-19

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2015-19

ATA:

46

Effective Date:

20 July 2015 

Type Certificate:

A-177

Subject: 

Information Systems – Potential Misleading Navigational Information

Applicability:

Bombardier Inc.:

Model BD-700-1A10 aeroplanes, serial numbers 9381, 9432 through 9708, 9711 through 9718 and 9720 

through 9730;

Model BD-700-1A11 aeroplanes, serial numbers 9386, 9401, 9445 through 9707, 9710 through 9717, 

9722, 9732, 9734 and 9737.

Compliance:

Within 15 months from the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished.

Background:

It was discovered that on certain aeroplanes, the network interface installed between the Information 

Management System (IMS) 6000 unit and the Cabin Entertainment System (CES) network may affect the 

Aircraft Control Domain (ACD). This could potentially compromise the operational integrity of the avionics 

system and result in misleading navigational information to the flight crew. Misleading navigational 

information could have adverse effects on the safe operation of the aeroplane.

This AD mandates the inspection and disconnection, as required, of the network interface installation 

between the IMS and the CES.

Corrective Actions:

Inspect and disconnect, as required, the network interface installation between the IMS and the CES in 

accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 700-

46-5005 or 700-46-6005, both at Revision 2 and dated 18 June 2015, or later revisions approved by the 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

Inspection and disconnection, as required, of the network interface installation between the IMS and the 

CES in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable Bombardier SB 700-46-5005 

or 700-46-6005, Basic Issue and Revision 1 dated 23 February 2015 and 20 March 2015 respectively, 

prior to the effective date of this AD, also meets the requirements of this AD.

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Rémy Knoerr

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Issued on 6 July 2015 

Contact:

Robert Farinas, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 or email AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4356 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4356

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Leucoquinizarin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Leucoquinizarin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEUCOQUINIZARIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.41.00        1,4,9,10-           Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          Tetrahydroxyanthr                                                 12/31/2016
                          acene
                          (Leucoquinizarin)
                          (CAS No. 476-60-
                          8) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2907.29.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M.L.,

Appellant,

v.

J.L.

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00139-CV

Appeal from the

231st District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#231-576495-15)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, M.L., has failed to pay the case filing 

fee, and further finding that Appellant has failed to file an amended notice of appeal as directed,

we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant did not pay the case filing fee of $205 when she filed her notice of appeal or 

establish that she is indigent in accordance with TEX.R.APP.P. 20.1. On July 7, 2016, the Clerk 

of the Court sent Appellant a second request for payment of the case filing fee. The letter also 

notified Appellant that failure to pay the case filing fee within twenty days could result in 

dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b) and (c). 

Appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to our notice. 
- 2 -

On June 17, 2016, the Second Court of Appeals directed Appellant to file an amended 

notice of appeal to correct multiple defects in the notice of appeal. Following transfer of this 

appeal from the Second Court of Appeals, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a second 

request for the amended notice of appeal. On our own motion, the Court extended the time for 

Appellant to file the amended notice of appeal to August 1, 2016. Appellant has not responded 

to our letter nor has she filed the amended notice of appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b), (c).

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

August 10, 2016

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4358 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4358

        To extend the temporary reduction of duty on 2-Methyl-5-
                       nitrobenzenesulfonic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

 Mr. Mulvaney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary reduction of duty on 2-Methyl-5-
                       nitrobenzenesulfonic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-5-NITROBENZENESULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.23 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Methyl-5-
nitrobenzenesulfonic acid) is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 233.09 No acceleration of Eligible Notes.

Eligible Notes shall not be subject to acceleration, in whole or in part, by USAID, the Noteholder or any other party. USAID shall not have the right to pay any amounts in respect of the Eligible Notes other than in accordance with the original payment terms of such Eligible Notes.
#### Robert E. Paris, Appellant, v. Thomas Subirana, Respondent.

*957Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—■ Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
#### § 232.10 Payment to USAID of excess amounts received by a Noteholder.

If a Noteholder shall, as a result of USAID paying compensation under this Guarantee, receive an excess payment, it shall refund the excess to USAID.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4353 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4353

   To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

  Ms. Matsui introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Protection Public Safety Act 
of 2012''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECTS.

    The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
is authorized to implement any flood risk management project for which, 
before the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army has 
transmitted to Congress a letter that includes--
            (1) a description of the project as recommended in a report 
        by the Chief of Engineers that concludes that the project is 
        technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
        justified; and
            (2) notification that the Office of Management and Budget 
        has concluded that the recommendations in the report are 
        consistent with the policy and programs of the President.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1006.930 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a debarring official under subpart H of this part to exclude a person from participating in covered transactions and transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1). A person so excluded is debarred.
April 26, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-03129-MMC Document 171 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Washington Green Apartments v. Elinor Busalacchi.

Motion for resettlement granted to the extent of fixing the costs awarded on the appeal in the Appellate Term in the amount of $30 plus disbursements and the order of this court entered on October 18, 1960 is resettled accordingly. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Noonan, JJ.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 453 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4365 

[Report No. 112–630] 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in 

the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2012 

Ms. BUERKLE (for herself and Mr. ROSS of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

JULY 30, 2012 

Additional sponsor: Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia 

JULY 30, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4365 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that 

accounts in the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4365 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 Section 8437(e)(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended in the first sentence— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘659)’’ and inserting ‘‘659),’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert9 ing the following: ‘‘, and shall be subject to a Fed10 eral tax levy under section 6331 of the Internal Rev11 enue Code of 1986.’’. 

12 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS. 

13 Any potential revenue gain attributable to the enact14 ment of this Act, as determined by the Director of the Con15 gressional Budget Office— 

16 (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the 

17 Treasury of the United States; and 

18 (2) shall be used solely for purposes of deficit re19 duction. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 453 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4365 

[Report No. 112–630] 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make 

are subject to certain Federal tax levies. clear that accounts in the Thrift Savings Fund 

JULY 30, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 313.7 Petition procedures for withdrawal or modification of a guidance document.

Any member of the public may submit a petition to the Peace Corps requesting the Agency to consider withdrawing or modifying any guidance document. Such requests shall be sent by email to *policy@peacecorps.gov* or mailed to the Peace Corps, Office of the General Counsel, 1275 First St. NW, Washington, DC 20526. The Peace Corps will respond to a petition within 90 days of receipt by the Agency.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARRY WHITLOCK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

PEPSI AMERICAS, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-2742 SI

JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS M.

DALTON, L. CHALMERS AND R.

WEBER (F. R. Civ. P. 54(b))

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted as to claims by plaintiffs M. Dalton,

L. Chalmers and R. Weber. The Court finds that there is no just reason for delay in entry of judgment

as to these three plaintiffs, while the balance of the claims proceed. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 54(b)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants and against

plaintiffs M. Dalton, L. Chalmers and R. Weber.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: April 9, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02742-SI Document 106 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Morris Weinstein, Respondent, v. Abraham Pomerantz et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award based upon an aggravation of a preexisting occupational disease claimed to be barred by section 40 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, appellants claiming the disease was not contracted within one year from the date of disablement. The claimant had worked as a baker for 50 years, at least 5 for the appellant. He contracted bronchial asthma — “ Baker’s asthma ” — many years prior to the date of disablement but for the preceding year it had been severe and “ irretraetable ”. The board found a pre-existing bronchial asthma and further that the exposure incurred in his last employment (employer herein) aggravated the condition and necessitated his ceasing work and which constituted an occupational disease. The testimony before the board justified such finding and was supported by substantial evidence. An aggravation under somewhat similar facts was held not barred by the time limitation in section 40. *(Matter of Mayr*v. *Price,*9 A D 2d 801; see, also, *Matter of Bichowsky*v. *Hickey Freeman Co.,*11 A D 2d 877.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to Workmen’s Compensation Board.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Miller, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 8, 1976, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. At the defendant’s first trial, the court granted the prosecutor’s motion to amend the bill of particulars to reflect that the alleged sale of heroin took place at the Southampton Village Motel instead of at the Shinnecock Motel, as was stated in the bill of particulars. The court denied the defendant’s motion to preclude and granted his application for a mistrial. Having requested a mistrial, the defendant may not now argue that the second trial, which resulted in his conviction, exposed him to double jeopardy (see *Matter of Napoli v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y.,*40 AD2d 159, affd 33 NY2d 980 [on the opn of Steuer, J., at the App Div], cert den 417 US 947; cf. *Matter of Cardin v Sedita,*53 AD2d 253). The Trial Judge’s finding at the first trial that the prosecutor’s failure to disclose the name of the correct hotel was not purposeful or willful is supported by the record. The defendant’s *1004contention that he did not in fact request the mistrial is contradicted by the transcript of the aborted first trial, which reveals that the defendant personally joined in his attorney’s request for a mistrial. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Latham, J. P., Damiani, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.