# PERMIT TO OPERATE

Under the authority of RSMo 643 and the Federal Clean Air Act the applicant is authorized to operate the air contaminant source(s) described below, in accordance with the laws, rules, and
conditions set forth here in.

Operating Permit Number: OP2001029
Expiration Date: 

### April 19, 2006
Project Number: 031-0021-023

Installation Name and Address Lone Star Industries, Inc. 2524 S. Sprigg Street Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 Cape Girardeau County

Parent Company's Name and Address Lone Star Industries, Inc. 300 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06912

Installation Description: Lone Star Industries, Inc. manufactures portland cement in Cape Girardeau County. The installation is located in an attainment area. The installation is an existing major source of particulate matter, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and hazardous air pollutants.

April 19, 2001 Effective Date Director or Designee Department of Natural Resources

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 2 Project No. 031-0021-023

Table of Contents



### I. I NSTALLATION 

### D ESCRIPTION AND 

### E QUIPMENT 

### L ISTING 

### ...................................................8

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................8
EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................8
EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS ..........................................................................11
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.................................................................12



### II. P LANT 

### W IDE 

### E MISSION 

### L IMITATIONS 

### .......................................................................13

Permit Condition PW001......................................................................................................13

10 CSR 10-6.170................................................................................................................ ........................... 13 Permit Condition PW002......................................................................................................14

10 CSR 10-6.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 14 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M....................................................................................................... ..................... 14 Permit Condition PW003......................................................................................................14

10 CSR 10-6.250................................................................................................................ ........................... 14 Permit Condition PW004......................................................................................................15

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 15

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 15 Permit Condition PW005......................................................................................................16

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 16 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 16 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 16 Permit Condition PW006......................................................................................................18

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 18 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 18 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 18 Permit Condition PW007......................................................................................................19

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 19 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 19 Permit Condition PW008......................................................................................................21

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 21 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 21 Permit Condition PW009......................................................................................................22

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 22 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 22 Permit Condition PW010......................................................................................................24

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 24 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 24 Permit Condition PW011......................................................................................................26

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 26 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 26 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 26 Permit Condition PW012......................................................................................................30

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 30 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 30 Permit Condition PW013......................................................................................................31

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 31 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 31 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 31 Permit Condition PW014......................................................................................................34

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 34 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 34 Permit Condition PW015......................................................................................................35

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 35 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 35 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 35 Permit Condition PW016......................................................................................................36

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 3 Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 36 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 36 Permit Condition PW017......................................................................................................38

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 38 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 38 Permit Condition PW018......................................................................................................42

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 42 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 42 Permit Condition PW019......................................................................................................43

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 43 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 43 Permit Condition PW020......................................................................................................45

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 45 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 45 Permit Condition PW021......................................................................................................53

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 53 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 53 Permit Condition PW022......................................................................................................59

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 59 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 59 Permit Condition PW023......................................................................................................62

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 62 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 62 Permit Condition PW024......................................................................................................65

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 65 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE .................................................................................................... ................... 65 Permit Condition PW025......................................................................................................66

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 66



### III. E MISSION 

### U NIT 

### S PECIFIC 

### E MISSION 

### L IMITATIONS 

### .......................................................68

EU0010 through EU0040 ....................................................................................................68 Permit Conditions EU0010-001 through EU0040-001 .........................................................68

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 68 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO .................................................................................................... .................. 68

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 68
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 68 EU0050 ......................................................................................................................... ......69
Permit Condition EU0050-001 .............................................................................................70

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 70 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO .................................................................................................... .................. 70

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 70

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 70 EU0060 through EU0240 ....................................................................................................72 Permit Conditions EU0060-001 through EU0240-001 .........................................................73

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 73 Permit Conditions EU0150-002 through EU0220-002 .........................................................74

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 74

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 74

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 74 Permit Conditions EU0150-003 through EU0220-003; ........................................................75
EU0230-002 and EU0240-002.............................................................................................75

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 75 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 75

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 75

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 75 EU0250 through EU0290 ....................................................................................................77 Permit Conditions EU0250-001 through EU0340-001 .........................................................79

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 79 Permit Conditions EU0250-002 through EU0340-002 .........................................................79

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 4 Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.070............................................................................................................... ........................... 79 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y...................................................................................................... ...................... 79

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 79

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 79 Permit Conditions EU0250-003 through EU0270-003; ........................................................81 and EU0290-003 through EU0340-003 ...............................................................................81

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 81 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 81

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 81
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 81 EU0350 through EU0360 ....................................................................................................84
Permit Conditions EU0350-001 and EU0360-001................................................................84

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 84 Permit Conditions EU0350-002 through EU0360-002 .........................................................85

10 CSR 10-6.070............................................................................................................... ........................... 85 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y...................................................................................................... ...................... 85

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 85

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 85 Permit Conditions EU0350-003 and EU0360-003................................................................86

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 86 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 86

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 86
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 86 EU0370 through EU0380 ....................................................................................................88
Permit Conditions EU0370-001 and EU0380-001................................................................88

10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ........................... 88 EU0390 and EU0400...........................................................................................................89
Permit Conditions EU0390-001 and EU0490-001................................................................90

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 90 Permit Conditions EU0390-002 and EU0490-002................................................................91

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ........................... 91 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 91

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 91
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 91 Permit Conditions EU0470-003 through EU0490-003 .........................................................93

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 93

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 93
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 93 EU0500 through EU0510 ....................................................................................................94
Permit Conditions EU0500-001 ...........................................................................................94

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 94
10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 94

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 94

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 94
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 94 Permit Condition EU0510-001 .............................................................................................96

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ........................... 96
10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ........................... 96

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 96

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 96
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 96 Permit Condition EU0500-002 .............................................................................................98

10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ........................... 98

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 98 Permit Condition EU0500-003 .............................................................................................99

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 99 Permit Condition EU0500-004 ...........................................................................................101

10 CSR 10-6.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 101 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF..................................................................................................... ................... 101 Permit Condition EU0500-005 and EU0510-002 ...............................................................106

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 5 Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 106 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 106 Permit Condition EU0500-006 and EU0510-003 ...............................................................109

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 109 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 109 Permit Condition EU0500-007 and EU0510-004 ...............................................................110

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 110 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 110 Permit Condition EU0500-008 ...........................................................................................115

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 115 Permit Condition EU0500-009 ...........................................................................................120

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 120 Permit Condition EU0500-010 ...........................................................................................124

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 124 Permit Condition EU0500-011 ...........................................................................................129

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 129 Permit Condition EU0500-012 ...........................................................................................133

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 133 Permit Condition EU0500-013 ...........................................................................................137

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 137 Permit Condition EU0500-014 ...........................................................................................141

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 141 Permit Condition EU0500-015 ...........................................................................................147

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 147 Permit Condition EU0500-016 ...........................................................................................149

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 149 Permit Condition EU0500-017 ...........................................................................................153

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 153 EU0520 and EU0530.........................................................................................................156
Permit Conditions EU0520-001 and EU0530-001..............................................................156

10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ......................... 156 Permit Conditions EU0520-002 and EU0530-002..............................................................157

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 157

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 157

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 157 EU0540 through EU0810 ..................................................................................................158 Permit Conditions EU0540-001 through EU0570-001 .......................................................162 EU0600-001 through EU0610-001 ....................................................................................162

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 162 Permit Conditions EU0580-001 through EU0590-001 .......................................................163

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 163

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 163 Permit Conditions EU0620-001 through EU0700-001 .......................................................164 EU0730-001 through EU0810-001 ....................................................................................164

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 164 Permit Conditions EU0540-002 through EU0610-002 .......................................................165 EU0650-002 through EU0660-002 ....................................................................................165
EU0700-002 ..................................................................................................................... .165 EU0710-001 through EU0720-001 ....................................................................................165 EU0730-002 through EU0810-002 ....................................................................................165

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 165

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 165

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 165 Permit Conditions EU0540-003 through EU0610-003 .......................................................166 EU0620-002 through EU0640-002 ....................................................................................166 EU0650-003 through EU0660-003 ....................................................................................166 EU0670-002 through EU0690-002 ....................................................................................166

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 6 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0730-003 through EU0810-003 ....................................................................................166

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 166 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 166

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 166
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 166 EU0820 through EU1030 ..................................................................................................168 Permit Conditions EU0820-001 through EU0940-001 .......................................................171

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 171

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 171 Permit Condition EU0950-001 through EU1030-001.........................................................172

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 172 Permit Conditions EU0820-002 through EU0940-002 .......................................................172 EU0960-002 through EU0990-002 ....................................................................................172

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 172

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 172

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 172 Permit Conditions EU0820-003 through EU0940-003 .......................................................174
EU0950-002 ..................................................................................................................... .174 EU0960-003 through EU0990-003 ....................................................................................174 EU1000-002 through EU1030-002 ....................................................................................174

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 174 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 174

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 174

10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 174 EU1040 through EU1520 ..................................................................................................176 Permit Condition EU1040-001 through EU1070 and .........................................................180 EU1380-001 through EU1500-001 ....................................................................................180

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 180 Permit Condition EU1080-001 through EU1370-001.........................................................181

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 181 Permit Conditions EU1510-001 and EU1520-001..............................................................181

10 CSR 10-3.050................................................................................................................ ......................... 181 Permit Conditions EU1040-002 through EU1070-002 .......................................................183 EU1410-002 through EU1450-002 ....................................................................................183 EU1510-002 through EU1520-002 ....................................................................................183

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 183

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 183
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 183 Permit Conditions EU1080-002 through EU1400-002 .......................................................184 EU1410-003 through EU1450-003 ....................................................................................184 EU1460-002 through EU1500-002 ....................................................................................184 EU1510-003 through EU1520-003 ....................................................................................184

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 184 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 184

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 184
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 184 Permit Conditions EU1040-003 through EU1070-003 .......................................................186

10 CSR 10-6.075................................................................................................................ ......................... 186 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 186

10 CSR 10-3.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 186
10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 186 EU1530 through EU1600 ..................................................................................................187 Permit Conditions EU1530-001 through EU1580-001 .......................................................189

10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 189 Permit Conditions EU1530-002 through EU1580-002 .......................................................190
EU1590-001 and EU1600-001...........................................................................................190

10 CSR 10-6.080................................................................................................................ ......................... 190 EU1610 ......................................................................................................................... ....195

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 7 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU1610-001 ...........................................................................................195

10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 195 EU1620 through EU1630 ..................................................................................................196
Permit Conditions EU1620-001 and EU1630-001..............................................................196

10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ......................... 196



### IV. C ORE 

### P ERMIT 

### R EQUIREMENTS 

### .............................................................................197

V. G ENERAL 

### P ERMIT 

### R EQUIREMENTS 

### .......................................................................200

P ERMIT D URATION ................................................................................................................200

G ENERAL R ECORD K EEPING AND R EPORTING R EQUIREMENTS ....................................................200

R ISK M ANAGEMENT P LANS U NDER S ECTION 112( R ) ..................................................................201

S EVERABILITY C LAUSE ..........................................................................................................201

G ENERAL R EQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................201

I NCENTIVE P ROGRAMS N OT R EQUIRING P ERMIT R EVISIONS ........................................................202

R EASONABLY A NTICIPATED O PERATING S CENARIOS ...................................................................202

C OMPLIANCE R EQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................202

P ERMIT S HIELD ....................................................................................................................203

E MERGENCY P ROVISIONS .......................................................................................................204

O PERATIONAL F LEXIBILITY .....................................................................................................205

O FF -P ERMIT C HANGES ..........................................................................................................205

R ESPONSIBLE O FFICIAL .........................................................................................................206

S TATEMENT OF B ASIS ............................................................................................................206

Attachment A................................................................................................................... ........................... 207
Attachment B................................................................................................................... ........................... 208
Attachment C................................................................................................................... ........................... 209
Attachment D................................................................................................................... ........................... 210
Attachment E................................................................................................................... ........................... 211
Attachment F ................................................................................................................... ........................... 212
Attachment G................................................................................................................... ........................... 213
Attachment H................................................................................................................... ........................... 214
Attachment I ................................................................................................................... ............................ 215
Attachment J ................................................................................................................... ........................... 216

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 8 Project No. 031-0021-023



## I. Installation Description and Equipment Listing

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION Lone Star Industries, Inc. manufactures portland cement in Cape Girardeau County. The installation is located in an attainment area. The installation is an existing major source of particulate matter (PM), sulfur oxides (SO X ), nitrogen oxides (NO X ), carbon monoxide (CO) and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs).

The installation contains quarry operations, raw material handling and storage, raw material grinding, kiln pyroprocessing, cement kiln dust handling, coke handling, clinker cooler, handling and storage, finish mill systems, and cement storage and loadout.

The installation is subject to the Portland Cement Manufacturing MACT and the Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT. The installation operates a long-dry process kiln, which contains an alkali bypass and an in-line raw mill. Since the installation is a major source of HAPs, the kiln, raw mill, finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system and bulk loading/unloading systems are covered by the Portland Cement Manufacturing MACT

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS The following list provides a description of the equipment at this installation which emit air pollutants and which are identified as having unit-specific emission limitations.

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit EU0010 Screen (A-2101) EU0020 Screen (A-2201) EU0030 Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801) EU0040 Transfer Belt (A-3802) EU0050 Secondary Crusher (A-3800) EU0060 Hopper (W-4600) EU0070 Mannermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary EU0080 Transfer Belt (W-4900) EU0090 Transfer Belt (W-5000) EU0100 Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0110 Hopper (W-5301) EU0120 Transfer Belt (W-5700) EU0130 Transfer Belt (W-3800) EU0140 Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000) EU0150 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone) EU0160 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore) EU0170 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli) EU0180 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale) EU0190 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum) EU0200 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone) EU0210 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash) EU0220 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash) EU0230 Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202) EU0240 Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0250 Hopper W-7100
EU0260 Feeder Belt W-9800
EU0270 Transfer Belt W-9700
EU0280 Screen W-9701
EU0290 Transfer Belt W-7900

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 9 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0300 Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106 EU0310 Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal) EU0320 Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)
EU0330 Transfer Belt C-1000
EU0340 Transfer Belt C-2400 EU0350 RSP Mill SystemC-2500 EU0360 Kiln Mill SystemC-1100

EU0370 Process Heater C-1400
EU0380 Process Heater C-2800 EU0390 Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0400 Truck Loading EU0410 Hopper Loading KB-7000
EU0420 Transfer Belt KB-7200
EU0430 Transfer Belt KB-7400
EU0440 Elevator KB-7500
EU0450 Transfer Belt KB-7600
EU0460 Transfer Belt KB-7700
EU0470 Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801
EU0480 Transfer Belt R-3803
EU0490 Transfer Belt R-3700
EU0500 Kiln KB-5100 EU0510 Raw Mill System R-4300
EU0520 Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601
EU0530 Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602
EU0540 Raw Blend Silo B-0701
EU0550 Raw Blend Silo B-0702
EU0560 Raw Blend Silo B-0703
EU0570 Raw Blend Silo B-0704
EU0580 Transfer Belt KB-1200
EU0590 Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600
EU0600 Air Slide KB-1808
EU0610 Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700 EU0620 Truck Loading KB-3821 EU0630 CKD Storage Silo KB-3800 EU0640 CKD Storage Silo KB-3900 EU0650 Drag Conveyor KC-501 EU0660 Drag Conveyor KC-502
EU0670 Elevator KC-0601
EU0680 Elevator KC-0602 EU0690 Truck Loading
EU0700 Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100 EU0710 Clinker Storage Pile Farm EU0720 Clinker Storage Pile Farm (Enclosed) EU0730 Hopper Loading W-9200
EU0740 Transfer Belt W-7900
EU0750 Transfer Belt W-8200
EU0760 Transfer Belt KC-1000

EU0770 Diverter Box KC-0603
EU0780 Clinker Bin W-6601 EU0790 Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4) EU0800 Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5) EU0810 Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)
EU0820 Transfer Belt KC-2600

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 10 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0830 Transfer Belt KC-2620
EU0840 Clinker Silo KC-2901
EU0850 Clinker Silo KC-2902
EU0860 Clinker Silo KC-2903
EU0870 Transfer Belt KC-2630 EU0880 Weigh Feeder KC-3002 EU0890 Weigh Feeder KC-3005 EU0900 Weigh Feeder KC-3008
EU0910 Transfer Belt KC-3200
EU0920 Bucket Elevator KC-3400
EU0930 Bucket Elevator KC-2550
EU0940 Transfer Belt KC-3600 EU0950 Truck Loading EU0960 Hopper TL-5000
EU0970 Transfer Belt TL-5300
EU0980 Transfer Belt TL-5500 EU0990 Barge Loading EU1000 Drag Conveyor F-8701 EU1010 Drag Conveyor F-12701
EU1020 Elevator F-8702
EU1030 Elevator F-12702
EU1040 Finish Mill F-12900
EU1050 Finish Mill F-8900 EU1060 Separator F-13500 EU1070 Separator F-9500 EU1080 Hopper for Finish Mill #4
EU1090 Air Slide for Finish Mill #4 EU1100 Hopper for Finish Mill #5
EU1110 Air Slide for Finish Mill #5
EU1120 – EU1210 New Cement Silo 37 – 46
EU1220 – EU1370 Old Cement Silo 21 – 36
EU1380 – EU1400 River Cement Silo 47 – 49
EU1410 Cement Transfer Belt D-4800
EU1420 Cement Transfer Belt
EU1430 Transfer Belt D-4100
EU1440 Transfer Belt D-4200 EU1450 Barge Loading TL-0800
EU1460 Distribution Box D-6900
EU1470 Elevator TL-0400
EU1480 Air Slide EU1490 Cement Bins (Truck) EU1500 Truck Loading EU1510 Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500 EU1520 Truck Unloading
EU1530 – EU1560 Blend Tank
EU1570 – EU1580 Burn Tank EU1590 Holding Tank EU1600 Mixing Tank EU1610 Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading EU1620 Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 470 kW EU1630 Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 500 kW

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 11 Project No. 031-0021-023

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS The following list provides a description of the equipment that does not have unit specific limitations at the time of permit issuance.

Description of Emission Source Drilling Blasting Raw Material Truck Unloading Quarry Haul Road Hopper (A-1601) Primary Crusher (A-1700) Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-1900) Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-2000) Chute (A-2002) Transfer Belt From Crusher to Piles (A-2500) Transfer Belt From Crusher to Piles (A-2600) Transfer Belt to Piles #1 (A-3300) Transfer Belt to Piles #4 (A-3400) Raw Material Storage Pile – Limestone Raw Material Storage Pile – Diaspore Raw Material Storage Pile – Tripoli
Piles in Shed Haul Road to Raw Material Storage Raw Material Storage Pile (Gypsum) Raw Material Storage Pile (Mill Scale) Haul Road (CH02) Solid Fuel Storage Pile (Coal) Haul Road (TH02) Solid Fuel Storage Pile (Tires) Storage Pile (Partially Enclosed) (TH06)
Haul Road to Landfill Clinker Haul Road (KP12A) Clinker Loading Haul Road Haul Road (AF01) Miscellaneous Painting 4 Parts Washers – 35 Gallon – Mineral Spirits Storage Tanks #2, 5 and 6 – 300 Gallon Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage Storage Tanks #3 and 4 – 150 Gallon Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage Storage Tank #7 – 8000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage (MS8) Storage Tank #8 – 10,000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage (MS8) Storage Tank #9 – 560 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Quarry Garage (MS03) Storage Tank #10 – 1000 Gallon Used Oil Tank – Quarry Garage Storage Tank #11 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Additive Crusher Storage Tank #12 – 250 Gallon Diesel Tank – River Unloading Dock Storage Tank #13 – 150 Gallon Diesel Tank – Spray Pond Pumps Storage Tank #14 – 50,000 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant (MS10) Storage Tank #15 – 560 Gallon Diesel Tank – Courtyard (MS8) Storage Tank #16 – 200 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant Emergency Generator Storage Tank #17 – 300 Gallon Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot (MS6) Storage Tank #17A – 300 Gallon Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot Storage Tank #18 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Plant Parking Lot (MS8) Storage Tank #19 – 300 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Plant Parking Lot Storage Tank #20 – 550 Gallon Diesel Tank – Contractor Parking Lot

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 12 Project No. 031-0021-023

Storage Tank #21 – 300 Gallon Gasoline Tank – Contractor Parking Lot Storage Tank #24 – 12,000 Gallon Air Entraining Tank – Plant Finish Mill Storage Tank #27 – 300 Gallon Diesel Tank – Waste Fuel Area (MS8) Storage Tank #28 – 500 Gallon Diesel Tank – Elec. Room - 17 2 Space Heaters – Kerosene - 0.3 MMBTU/Hr Vehicle Refueling (Diesel and Gasoline) – (AF10, MS04 and MS9) Pump-Off Station/Pail Loading Unloader/Crusher
Landfill

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE These documents have been incorporated by reference into this permit.

1) Construction Permit Number: 1197-012A; 2) Construction Permit Number: 0496-007.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 13 Project No. 031-0021-023



## II. Plant Wide Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

Permit Condition PW001



### 10 CSR 10-6.170 Restriction of Particulate Matter to the Ambient Air Beyond the Premises of Origin
Emission Limitation: No person may cause or allow to occur any handling, transporting or storing of any material; construction, repair, cleaning or demolition of a building or its appurtenances; construction or use of a road, driveway or open area; or operation of a commercial or industrial installation without applying reasonable measures as may be required to prevent, or in a manner which allows or may allow, fugitive particulate matter to go beyond the premises of origin in quantities that the particulate matter:

• Remains visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin; or

• May be found on surfaces beyond the property line of origin. The nature or origin of the particulate matter on these surfaces shall be determined to a reasonable degree by a technique proven to be accurate and approved by the
Director. Monitoring: The permittee shall conduct inspections of its installation sufficient to determine compliance with this regulation. If a violation of this regulation is discovered, the source shall undertake
corrective action to eliminate the violation. The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner to the initial monitoring frequency. Record keeping: A log must be maintained noting the following:

• Whether air emissions (except water vapor) remain visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin.

• Whether the visible emissions were normal for the installation.

• Equipment malfunctions that could cause an exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.170.

• Any violations of 10 CSR 10-6.170 and any corrective actions undertaken to correct the
violation.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Attachment A contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, or any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 14 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW002



### 10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

### 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M

National Emission Standard for Asbestos

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall follow the procedures and requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M for any activities occurring at this installation which would be subject to provisions for 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos

. Monitoring: Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with registration, certification, notification, and Abatement Procedures and Practices standards as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Record keeping: Any appropriate record keeping as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Reporting: Any appropriate reporting as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

Permit Condition PW003



### 10 CSR 10-6.250 Asbestos Abatement Projects – Certification, Accreditation, and Business Exemption Requirements
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall conduct all asbestos abatement projects within the procedures established for certification and accreditation by 10 CSR 10-6.250.

• An individual must receive certification from the department before that individual participates in an asbestos abatement project operating in Missouri according to Section (3). This certification is annually renewable. Certification as an AHERA inspector, AHERA management planner and AHERA project designer apply to AHERA-related projects.

• To be a training provider for the purpose of this rule a school shall apply for accreditation to the department and comply with the United States Environmental Protection Agency AHERA Model Accreditation plan 40 CFR Part 763 Appendix C, Subpart E. Details of the requirements for accreditation are found in Section (4). Monitoring: Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation
standards. Record keeping: Any appropriate record keeping to demonstrate compliance with Certification and
Accreditation standards. Reporting: Any appropriate reporting to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation
standards.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 15 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW004



### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation: No person may discharge into the ambient air from any single source of emission whatsoever, any air contaminant:

• Of a shade or density equal to or darker than that designated as No. 1 on the Ringlemann Chart (20% opacity); or

• Of an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke designated as No. 1 on the Ringlemann Chart (20% opacity).

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes air contaminants of a shade or density not equal to nor darker than No. 3 (60% opacity) on the Ringlemann Chart; or of an opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree not equal to nor greater than does smoke designated as No. 3 (60% opacity) on the Ringlemann Chart. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period
then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on each emission unit with a stack or vent by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 16 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-3.080 or 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition PW005



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.1354(b)(4) and (b)(5) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)
Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all routine or otherwise predictable CMS malfunctions. This plan shall be developed by the owner or operator by the source’s compliance date for that relevant standard. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source’s title V permit. The purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is to: (§63.6(e)(3)(i))

• Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards; (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(A))

• Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(B))

• Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(C)) Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(1)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 17 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan, the owner or operator shall keep records for that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed. These records may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of recordkeeping, that confirms conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that event. In addition the owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in §63.10(b) (and elsewhere in this Part), including records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, or malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution control equipment. (§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall record the actions taken for that event. ((§63.6(e)(3)(iv))

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(5), if actions taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the source’s startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan specified in §63.6(e)(3), the owner or operator shall state such information in a semiannual report. Reports shall only be required if a startup, shutdown, or malfunction occurred during the reporting period. The startup, shutdown, and malfunction report may be submitted simultaneously with the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance reports; and (§63.1354(b)(4))

• Any time an action taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall make an immediate report of the actions taken for that event within two (2) working days, by telephone call or facsimile (FAX) transmission. The immediate report shall be followed by a letter, certified by the owner or operator or other responsible official, explaining the circumstances of the event, the reasons for not following the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and whether any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred. (§63.1354(b)(5)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 18 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW006



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Operations and Maintenance Plan §63.1350(a) and (b) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each portland cement plant shall prepare for each affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart, a written operations and maintenance plan. The plan shall include the following information: (§63.1350(a)) (1) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air pollution control devices in order to meet the emission limits and operating limits of §§63.1343 through 63.1348; (§63.1350(a)(1)) (2) Corrective actions to be taken when required by paragraph (e) of this section; (§63.1350(a)(2)) (3) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each kiln and each in-line kiln raw mill located at the facility at least once per year; and (§63.1350(a)(3)) (4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources subject to opacity standards under §§63.1346 and 63.1348. Such procedures must include the provisions of paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(iv) of this section. (§63.1350(a)(4)) (i) The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i)) (ii) If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii)) (iii) If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emission are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly test. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii)) (iv) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

• Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan developed in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(b))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 19 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(1)(ii)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the Operations and Maintenance plan on-site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• As specified in the Operations and Maintenance Plan. Reporting:

• The plan shall be submitted to the Administrator for review and approval as part of the application for a Part 70 permit. (§63.1350(a))

• All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a) shall be included in the semiannual summary report. (§63.1354(b)(9)(v)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition PW007



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Notification Requirements §63.1353, Reporting Requirements §63.1354(a) and Record keeping Requirements §63.1355(a) and (b) Emission Limitation:

• The notification provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A that apply and those that do not apply to owners and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a notice that contains all of the information required in a notification listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the notice sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that notification. (§63.1353(a))

• Each owner or operator subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply with the notification requirements in §63.9 as listed below. (§63.1353(b)) Monitoring:
None Record keeping:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 20 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operators shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this Part; and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting:

• Initial notifications as required by §63.9(b) through (d). For the purposes of this subpart, a Title V or 40 CFR Part 70 permit application may be used in lieu of the initial notification required under §63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit application as required by §63.9(b), and the State to which the permit application has been submitted has an approved operating permit program under Part 70 of this Chapter and has received delegation of authority from the EPA. Permit applications shall be submitted by the same due dates as those specified for the initial notification. (§63.1353(b)(1))

• Notification of performance tests, as required by §§63.7 and 63.9(e). (§63.1353(b)(2))

• Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by §63.1349 in accordance with §§63.6(h)(5) and 63.9(f). (§63.1353(b)(3))

• Notification, as required by §63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor performance evaluation required by §63.8(e) is scheduled to begin. (§63.1353(b)(4))

• Notification of compliance status, as required by §63.9(h). (§63.1353(b)(5))

• The reporting provisions of Subpart A of this part that apply and those that do not apply to owners or operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a report that contains all of the information required in a report listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the report sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that report. (§63.1354(a))

• As required by §63.10(d)(4), the owner or operator of an affected source who is required to submit progress reports as a condition of receiving an extension of compliance under §63.6(i) shall submit such reports by the dates specified in the written extension of compliance. (§63.1354(b)(3))

• The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually which contains the information specified in §63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include (§63.1354(b)(9): (1) All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in §63.1344(a) and (b); (§63.1354(b)(9)(i) (2) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required under §63.1350(f)(7); and (§63.1354(b)(9)(ii)) (3) All failures to maintain the activated carbon injection rate, and the activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop, as applicable, as required under §63.1344(c). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iii) (4) The results of any combustion system component inspections conducted within the reporting period as required under §63.1350(i). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iv)) (5) All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1354(b)(9)(v))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 21 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition PW008



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Performance Testing Requirements §63.1349
Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of any affected source subject to this subpart shall demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of §63.1343 and §63.1345 through §63.1348 using the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. (§63.1349(a)) Performance Testing: Performance tests to demonstrate initial compliance with this subpart shall be conducted as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) through §63.1349(b)(4). (§63.1349(b)) Monitoring: As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. Record keeping:

• As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• Performance test results shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the information required by §63.1349(a)(1) through (a)(10) of this section, as well as all other relevant information. The plan to be followed during testing shall be made available to the Administrator prior to testing, if requested. (§63.1349(a))

• A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system; (§63.1349(a)(1))

• Sampling location description(s); (§63.1349(a)(2))

• A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modification to standard procedures; (§63.1349(a)(3))

• Test results; (§63.1349(a)(4))

• Quality assurance procedures and results; (§63.1349(a)(5))

• Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures; (§63.1349(a)(6))

• Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses; (§63.1349(a)(7))

• Documentation of calculation; (§63.1349(a)(8))

• All data recorded and used to establish parameters for compliance monitoring; and (§63.1349(a)(9))

• Any other information required by the test method. (§63.1349(a)(10)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 22 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW009



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Alternate Monitoring Requirements §63.1350
Emission Limitation:

• An owner or operator may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternate monitoring requirements to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart, except for emission standards for THC, subject to the provisions of §63.1350(l)(1) through (l)(6). (§63.1350(l))

• The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case-by-case basis that additional or alternative operating limits, or alternative approaches to establishing operating limits, are necessary to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(6)) Monitoring: If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or operator must continue to use the original monitoring requirement until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement. (§63.1350(l)(2)) Record keeping:

• If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or operator must continue to use the original record keeping requirements for the original monitoring requirements until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 23 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than those specified in this section, unless the owner or operator documents, using data or information, that the longer averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct three (3) runs of the performance test. (§63.1350(l)(1))

• The owner or operator shall submit the application for approval of alternate monitoring requirements no later than the notification of performance test. The application must contain the information specified in §63.1350(l)(3)(i) through (l)(3)(iii): (§63.1350(l)(3) (1) Data or information justifying the request, such as the technical or economic infeasibility, or the impracticality of using the required approach. (§63.1350(l)(3)(i)) (2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach and technique, the averaging period for the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated; and (§63.1350(l)(3)(ii)) (3) Data or information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. (§63.1350(l)(3)(iii)

• The Administrator will notify the owner or operator of the approval or denial of the application within ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of the original request, or within sixty (60) calendar days of the receipt of any supplementary information, whichever is later. The Administrator will not approve an alternate monitoring application unless it would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. Before disapproving any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide (§63.1350(l)(4)): (1) Notice of the information and findings upon which the intended disapproval is based; and (§63.1350(l)(4)(i)) (2) Notice of opportunity for the owner or operator to present additional supporting information before final action is taken on the application. This notice will specify how much additional time is allowed for the owner or operator to provide additional supporting information. (§63.1350(l)(4)(ii))

• The owner or operator is responsible for submitting any supporting information in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application prior to the performance test. Neither submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or disapprove the application relieves the owner or operator of the responsibility to comply with any provision of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(5)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 will be federally and state enforceable on and after June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 24 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW010



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Monitoring and Compliance Provisions §63.1206(a) through (b)(5)
Emission Limitation:

• The emission standards and operating requirements apply at all times except: (§63.1206(b)(1)(i)) (1) During startup, shutdown and malfunction, provided that hazardous waste is not in the combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste feed to the combustor has been cutoff for a period of time not less than the hazardous waste residence time) during those periods of operation as provided by §63.1206(c)(2)(ii); and (§63.1206(b)(1)(i)) (2) When hazardous waste is not in the combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste feed to the combustor has been cutoff for a period of time not less than the hazardous waste residence time), and you have: (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii)) (i) Submitted a written, one (1)-time notice to the Administrator documenting compliance with all applicable requirements and standards promulgated under authority of the Clean Air Act, including sections 112 and 129; and (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(A)) (ii) Documented in the operating record that you are complying with such applicable requirements in lieu of the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(B))

• If the permittee plans to change (as defined in §63.1206(b)(5)(iii)) the design operation, or maintenance practices of the source in a manner that may adversely affect compliance with an emission standard that is not monitored with a CEMS: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)) (1) Restriction on Waste Burning – Except as provided by §63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2), after the change and prior to submitting the notification of compliance, the permittee must not burn hazardous waste for more than a total of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator) and only for purposes of pretesting or comprehensive performance testing. Pretesting is defined at §63.1207(h)(2)(i) and (ii). (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(1))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance – If the permittee determines that a change will not adversely affect compliance with the emission standards or operating requirements, the permittee must document the change in the operating record upon making such change. The permittee must revise as necessary the performance test plan, Documentation of Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and start-up, shutdown, and malfunction plan to reflect these changes. (§63.1206(b)(5)(ii))

• Definition of Change – “Change means any change in design, operation, or maintenance practices that were documented in the comprehensive performance test plan, Notification of Compliance, or startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan. (§63.1206(b)(5)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 25 Project No. 031-0021-023

Compliance Dates:

• The permittee must comply with the standards of this subpart no later than September 30, 2002, unless the Administrator grants an extension of time under §63.6(i) or §63.1213, or you comply with the requirements of §63.1206(a)(2) for sources that do not intend to comply with the emission standards. (§63.1206(a)(1))

• Sources that do not intend to comply. Except for those sources meeting the requirements of §63.1210(b)(10)(iv), sources: (§63.1206(a)(2)) (1) That signify in their Notification of Intent to Comply (NIC) an intent not to comply with the requirements of this subpart, must stop burning hazardous waste on or before October 1, 2001. (§63.1206(a)(2)(i)) (2) That do not intent do comply with this subpart must include in their NIC a schedule that includes key dates for the steps to be taken to stop burning hazardous waste. Key dates include the date for submittal of RCRA closure documents required under Subpart G, Part 264, of this Chapter. (§63.1206(a)(2)(ii))

• For a standard in this subpart that is more stringent than the standard proposed on April 19, 1996, the permittee may achieve compliance no later than September 30, 2002 if the permittee complies with the standard proposed on April 19, 1996 after September 30, 1999. This exception does not apply to new or reconstructed area source hazardous waste combustors that become major sources after September 30, 1999. As provided by §63.6(b)(7), such sources must comply with this subpart at startup. (§63.1206(a)(3)(ii)) Monitoring:

• The Administrator will determine compliance with the emission standards of this subpart as provided by §63.6(f)(2). Conducting performance testing under operating conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is consistent with the requirements of §§63.6(f)(2)(iii)(B) and 63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under representative operating conditions. (§63.1206(b)(2))

• The Administrator will make a finding concerning compliance with the emission standards and other requirements of this subpart as provided by §63.6(f)(3). (§63.1206(b)(3))

• The Administrator may grant an extension of compliance with the emission standards of this subpart as provided by §§63.6(i) and 63.1213. (§63.1206(b)(4)) Record keeping:

• The permittee must document the change in the operating record upon making a change in design, operation or maintenance. The permittee must revise as necessary the performance test plan, Documentation of Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and start-up, shutdown, and malfunction plan to reflect these changes. (§63.1206(b)(5)(ii))

• The permittee must maintain copies of the performance test plan, Documentation of Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction plan. The permittee shall keep a copy of the plans, documentation, and notifications on-site at all times. The plans, documentation, and notifications shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 26 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the permittee plans to change the design, operation or maintenance practices of the source in a manner that may adversely affect compliance with an emission standard that is not monitored with a CEMS: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i))

• Notification – The permittee must notify the Administrator at least sixty (60) days prior to the change, unless the permittee documents circumstances that dictate that such prior notice is not reasonably feasible. The notification must include: (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A))

• A description of the changes and which emission standards may be affected; and (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A)(1))

• A comprehensive performance test schedule and test plan under the requirements of §63.1207(f) that will document compliance with the affected emission standard(s); (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(A)(2))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance - Restriction on Waste Burning – The permittee may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous waste in the interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than testing or pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on operating parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart based on available information. The Administrator will review, modify as necessary, and approve if warranted the interim operating requirements. (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW011



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Operating Requirements – General - §63.1206(c)(1) - Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan - §63.1206(c)(2) - Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff (AWFCO) - §63.1206(c)(3) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 27 Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must operate only under the operating requirements specified in the Documentation of Compliance under §63.1211(d) or the Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d), except: (§63.1206(c)(1)(i)) (1) During performance tests under approved test plans according to §63.1207(e), (f) and (g), and (§63.1206(c)(1)(i)(A)) (2) Under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(1)(i) or (ii). (§63.1206(c)(1)(i)(B))

• The Documentation of Compliance and the Notification of Compliance must contain operating requirements including, but not limited to, the operating requirements in §63.1206(c) and §63.1209. (§63.1206(c)(1)(ii))

• Failure to comply with the operating requirements is failure to ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1206(c)(1)(iii))

• Operating requirements in the Notification of Compliance are applicable requirements for purposes of Parts 70 and 71 of this Chapter. (§63.1206(c)(1)(iv))

• The operating requirements specified in the Notification of Compliance will be incorporated in the Title V permit. (§63.1206(c)(1)(v))

• Except as provided by §63.1260(c)(2)(ii), the permittee is subject to the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan requirements of §63.6(e)(3). (§63.1206(c)(2)(i))

• Even if the permittee follows the startup and shutdown procedures and the corrective measures upon a malfunction that are prescribed in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan, the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart apply if hazardous waste is in the combustion chamber (i.e., if you are feeding hazardous waste or if startup, shutdown, or a malfunction occurs before the hazardous waste residence time has transpired after hazardous waste cutoff). (§63.1206(c)(2)(ii))

• The permittee must record the plan in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(2)(iv))

• The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all routine or otherwise predictable CMS malfunctions. This plan shall be developed by the owner or operator by the source’s compliance date for that relevant standard. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source’s Title V permit. The purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is to: (§63.6(e)(3)(i)) (1) Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards; (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(A)) (2) Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(B)) (3) Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i)(C))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 28 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Upon the compliance date, the permittee must operate the hazardous waste combustor with a functioning system that immediately and automatically cuts off the hazardous waste feed, except as provided by §63.1206(c)(3)(viii): (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)) (1) When any of the following are exceeded: Operating parameter limits specified under §63.1209; an emission standard monitored by a CEMS; or the allowable combustion chamber pressure; (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(A)) (2) When the span value of any CMS detector, except a CEMS, is met or exceeded; ((§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(B)) (3) Upon malfunction of a CMS monitoring an operating parameter limit specified under §63.1209 or an emission level; or (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(C)) (4) When any component of the automatic waste feed cutoff system fails. (§63.1206(c)(3)(i)(D))

• Ducting of Combustion Gases – During an AWFCO, the permittee must continue to duct combustion gasses to the air pollution control system while hazardous waste remains in the combustion chamber (i.e., if the hazardous waste residence time has not transpired since the hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated). (§63.1206(c)(3)(ii))

• Restarting Waste Feed – The permittee must continue to monitor during the cutoff the operating parameters for which limits are established under §63.1209 and the emissions required under that section to be monitored by a CEMS, and the permittee must not restart the hazardous waste feed until the operating parameters and emission levels are within the specified limits. (§63.1206(c)(3)(iii))

• Failure of the AWFCO System – If the AWFCO system fails to automatically and immediately cutoff the flow of hazardous waste upon exceedance of parameter required to be interlocked with the AWFCO system under §63.1206(c)(3)(i), the permittee has failed to comply with the AWFCO requirements of §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1206(c)(3)(iv))

• Ramping Down Waste Feed – The permittee may ramp down the waste feedrate of pumpable hazardous waste over a period not to exceed one (1) minute, except as provided by §63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(B). If the permittee elects to ramp down the waste feed, the permittee must document ramp down procedures in the operating and maintenance plan. The procedures must specify that the ramp down begins immediately upon initiation of automatic waste feed cutoff and the procedures must prescribe a bona fide ramping down. If an emission standard or operating limit is exceeded during the ramp down, the permittee has failed to comply with the emission standards or operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(A))

• Ramping Down Waste Feed – If the automatic waste feed cutoff is triggered by an exceedance of any of the following operating limits, the permittee may not ramp down the waste feed cutoff: Minimum combustion chamber temperature, maximum hazardous waste feedrate, or any hazardous waste firing system operating limits that may be established for the permittee’s combustor. (§63.1206(c)(3)(viii)(B)) Testing:

• The AWFCO system and associated alarms must be tested at least weekly to verify operability, unless the permittee documents in the operating record that weekly inspections will unduly restrict or upset operations and that less frequent inspection will be adequate. At a minimum, the permittee must conduct operability testing at least monthly. The permittee must document and record in the operating record AWFCO operability test procedures and results. (§63.1206(c)(3)(vii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 29 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator of an affected source shall operate and maintain such source (including associated air pollution control equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan developed under paragraph (e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(3)(ii))

• Corrective Measures – If, after any AWFCO, there is an exceedance of an emission standard or operating requirement, irrespective of whether the exceedance occurred while hazardous waste remained in the combustion chamber (i.e., whether the hazardous waste residence time has transpired since the hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated), the permittee must investigate the cause of the AWFCO, take appropriate corrective measures to minimize future AWFCOs, and record the findings and corrective measure in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(3)(v)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the Start-up, Shutdown and Malfuntion plan, the owner or operator shall keep records for that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed. These records may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of recordkeeping, that confirms conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that event. In addition the owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in §63.10(b) (and elsewhere in this part), including records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, or malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution control equipment. (§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall record the actions taken for that event. (§63.6(e)(3)(iv)) Reporting: Excessive Exceedance Reporting –

• For each set of ten (10) exceedances of an emission standard or operating requirement while hazardous waste remains in the combustion chamber (i.e., when the hazardous waste residence time has not transpired since the hazardous waste feed was cutoff) during a sixty (60) day block period, the permittee must submit to the Administrator a written report within five (5) calendar days of the 10 th exceedance documenting the exceedances and results of the investigation and corrective measures taken. (§63.1206(c)(3)(vi)(A))

• On a case-by-case basis, the Administrator may require excessive exceedance reporting when fewer than ten (10) exceedances occur during a sixty (60) day period. (§63.1206(c)(3)(vi)(B)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 30 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW012



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Operating Requirements - Combustion System Leaks - §63.1206(c)(5)
Emission Limitation: Combustion system leaks of hazardous air pollutants must be controlled by: (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)

• Keeping the combustion zone sealed to prevent combustion system leaks; or (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(A))

• Maintaining the maximum combustion zone pressure lower than ambient pressure using an instantaneous monitor; or (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(B))
Alternate Standard Provision: Upon prior written approval of the Administrator, an alternative means of control to provide control of combustion system leaks equivalent to maintenance of combustion zone pressure lower than ambient pressure. (§63.1206(c)(5)(i)(C)) Operating Parameters: If the permittee complies with the requirements for combustion system leaks under §63.1206(c)(5) by maintaining the maximum combustion chamber zone pressure lower than ambient pressure, the permittee must monitor the pressure instantaneously and the automatic waste feed cutoff system must be engaged when negative pressure is not maintained at any time. (§63.1209(p)) Monitoring:

• Good Operating and Maintenance Practices.

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 31 Project No. 031-0021-023

(i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B)) Record keeping:

• The permittee must specify in the operating record the method used for control of combustion system leaks. (§63.1206(c)(5)(ii))

• If the permittee complies with the requirements for combustion system leaks under §63.1206(c)(5) by maintaining the maximum combustion chamber zone pressure lower than ambient pressure, the permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring system.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW013



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Record keeping and Reporting Requirements - §63.1211(a) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Excess Emissions and Continuous Monitoring System Performance Report and Summary Report - §63.10(e)(3)
Emission Limitation:

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as required in §63.10(e)(3). (§63.1211(a))

• The permittee of an affected source required to install a CMS by a relevant standard shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and/or a summary report to the Administrator semiannually, except when: (§63.10(e)(3)(i)) (1) More frequent reporting is specifically required by a relevant standard; (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(A)) (2) The Administrator determines on a case-by-case basis that more frequent reporting is necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of the source; or (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(B)) (3) The CMS data are to be used directly for compliance determination and the source experienced excess emissions, in which case quarterly reports shall be submitted. Once a source reports excess emissions, the source shall follow a quarterly reporting format until a request to reduce reporting frequency under §63.10(e)(3)(ii) is approved. (§63.10(e)(3)(i)(C))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 32 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee who is required by a relevant standard to submit excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (and summary) reports on a quarterly (or more frequent) basis may reduce the frequency of reporting for that standard to semiannual if the following conditions are met: (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)) 1) For one (1) fullyear (e.g., four (4) quarterly or twelve (12) monthly reporting periods) the affected source’s excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance reports continually demonstrate that the source is in compliance with the relevant standard; (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(A)) 2) The permittee continues to comply with all record keeping and monitoring requirements specified in this subpart and the relevant standard; (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(B)) 3) The Administrator does object to a reduced frequency of reporting for the affected source, as provided in §63.10(e)(3)(iii). (§63.10(e)(3)(ii)(C))

• As soon as CMS data indicate that the source is not in compliance with any emission limitation or operating parameter specified in the relevant standard, the frequency of reporting shall revert to the frequency specified in the relevant standard, and the permittee shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (a summary) report for the noncomplying emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following the noncomplying event. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant standard for another full year, the permittee may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce the frequency of reporting for that standard, as provided for in §63.10(e)(3)(ii) and §63.10(e)(3)(iii). (§63.10(e)(3)(iv))

• All excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports and all summary reports, if required, shall be delivered or post-marked by the 30 th day following the end of each calendar half or quarter, as appropriate. (§63.10(e)(3)(v))

• If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter exceedance for the reporting period is less than one percent (1%) of the total operating time for the reporting period, and CMS downtime for the reporting period is less than five percent (5%) of the total operating time for the reporting period, only the summary report shall be submitted and the full excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report need not be submitted unless required by the Administrator. (§63.10(e)(3)(vii))

• If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter exceedance for the reporting period is one percent (1%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the total CMS downtime for the reporting period is five percent (5%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, both the summary report and the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report shall be submitted. (§63.10(e)(3)(viii)) Monitoring:

None. Record keeping: The permittee shall maintain copies of the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and/or summary report. The permittee shall keep a copy of the reports on site at all times. The reports shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 33 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The frequency of reporting of excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (and summary) reports required to comply with a relevant standard may be reduced only after the permittee notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to make such a change and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a reduced frequency of reporting, the Administrator may review information concerning the source’s entire previous performance history during the five (5) year record keeping period prior to the intended change, including performance test results, monitoring data and evaluations of an owner or operator’s conformance with operation and maintenance requirements. Such information may be used by the Administrator to make a judgement about the source’s potential for noncompliance in the future. If the Administrator disapproves the permittee’s request to reduce the frequency of reporting, the Administrator will notify the permittee in writing within forty-five (45) days after receiving notice of the owner or operator’s intention. The notification from the Administrator to the permittee will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within forty-five (45) days, approval is automatically granted. (§63.10(e)(3)(iii))

• As soon as CMS data indicate that the source is not in compliance with any emission limitation or operating parameter specified in the relevant standard, the permittee shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance (an summary) report for the noncomplying emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following the noncomplying event. (§63.10(e)(3)(iv))

• Written reports of excess emissions or exceedances of process or control system parameters shall include all the information required in §63.10(c)(5) through (c)(13), in §63.8(c)(7) and §63.8(c)(8), and in the relevant standard, and they shall contain the name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report. When no excess emissions or exceedances of a parameter have occurred, or a CMS has not been inoperative, out of control, repaired, or adjusted, such information shall be stated in the report. (§63.10(e)(3)(v))

• As required under §63.10(e)(3)(vii) and (viii), one (1) summary report shall be submitted for the hazardous air pollutants monitored at each affected source (unless the relevant standard specifies that more than one (1) summary report is required, e.g., one (1) summary report for each hazardous air pollutant monitored). The summary report shall be entitled “Summary Report – Gaseous and Opacity Excess Emission and Continuous Monitoring system Performance” and shall contain the following information: (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)) (1) The company name and address of the affected source; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(A)) (2) An identification of each hazardous air pollutant monitored at the affected source; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(B)) (3) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting period; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(C)) (4) A brief description of the process units; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(D)) (5) The emission and operating parameter limitations specified in the relevant standard(s); (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(E)) (6) The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s); (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(F)) (7) The date of the latest CMS certification or audit; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(G)) (8) The total operating time of the affected source during the reporting period; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(H)) (9) An emission data summary (or similar summary if the permittee monitors control system parameters), including the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of excess emissions expressed ass a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and a breakdown of the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period into those that are due to startup/shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(I))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 34 Project No. 031-0021-023

(10) A CMS performance summary (or similar summary if the permittee monitors control system parameter), including the total CMS downtime during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of CMS downtime, expressed as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and a breakdown of the total CMS downtime during the reporting period into periods that are due to monitoring equipment malfunctions, nonmonitoring equipment malfunctions, quality assurance/quality control calibrations, other known causes, and other unknown causes; (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(J)) (11) A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls since the last reporting period; ((§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(K)) (12) The name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report; and (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(L)) (13) The date of the report. (§63.10(e)(3)(vi)(M))

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW014



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Operating Requirements – Operator Training and Certification - §63.1206(c)(6)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must establish training programs for all categories of personnel whose activities may reasonably be expected to directly affect emissions of hazardous air pollutants from the source. Such persons include, but are not limited to chief facility operators, control room operators, continuous monitoring system operators, persons that sample and analyze feedstreams, persons that manage and charge feedstreams to the combustor, persons that operate emission control devices, and ash and waste handlers. Each training program shall be of a technical level commensurate with the person’s job duties specified in the training manual. Each commensurate training program shall require an examination to be administered by the instructor at the end of the training course. Passing of this test shall be deemed the “certification for personnel, except that for control room operators and shift supervisors, the training and certification programs shall be as specified in §63.1206(c)(6)(iii) and (iv). (§63.1206(c)(6)(i))

• The permittee must ensure that the source is operated and maintained at all times by persons who are trained and certified to perform these and any other duties that may affect emissions of hazardous air pollutants. (§63.1206(c)(6)(ii))

• The training and certification program must be approved by the state or the Administrator and must be complete and reliable and conform to principles of good operator and operating practices (including training and certification). (§63.1206(c)(6)(iv)) Monitoring:

• The permittee must establish a training and certification program for each person who has responsibilities affecting operations that may affect emissions of hazardous air pollutants from the source. (§63.1206(c)(6)(i)) Record keeping:

• The permittee must record the operator training and certification program in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(6)(v))

• The permittee shall maintain training records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 35 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

None The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW015



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Operating Requirements – Operation and Maintenance Plan - §63.1206(c)(7) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must prepare and at all times operate according to an operation and maintenance plan that describes in detail procedures for operation, inspection, maintenance and corrective measures for all components of the combustor, including associated pollution control equipment, that could affect emissions of regulated hazardous air pollutants. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(A))

• The plan must prescribe how the permittee will operate and maintain the combustor in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels achieved during the comprehensive performance test. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(B))

• The plan ensures compliance with the operation and maintenance requirements of §63.6(e) and minimizes emissions of pollutants, automatic waste feed cutoffs and malfunctions. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(C))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(iii)) Monitoring:

• As specified in the operation and maintenance plan.

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(1)(ii)) Record keeping:

• The permittee must record the plan in the operating record. (§63.1206(c)(7)(i)(D))

• The permittee shall maintain the records specified in the operation and maintenance plan. The permittee shall maintain training records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

None The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 36 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW016



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Operating Requirements – Summary of Notification Requirements - §63.1210(a) – Summary of Reporting Requirements - §63.1211(a) Notification, Request, Petition or Application: Summary of Requirements: (§63.1210(a))

• The permittee must submit the following notifications to the Administrator: (§63.1210(a)(1)) (1) Initial Notifications that the permittee is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as specified in §63.9(b). (2) Notification of Intent to Comply as specified in §63.1210(b) and (c). (3) Notification that the permittee is subject to special compliance requirements as specified in §63.9(d). (4) Notification of performance test and continuous monitoring system evaluation, including the performance test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan (The permittee may also be required on a case-by-case basis to submit a feedstream analysis plan under §63.1209(c)(3)) as specified in §63.1207(e), §63.9(e), §63.9(g)(1) and (3). (5) Notification of compliance, including results of performance tests and continuous monitoring system performance evaluations as specified in §63.1210(d), §63.1207(j), §63.9(h), §63.10(d)(2) and §63.10(e)(2). (6) Notifications of changes in design, operation, or maintenance as specified §63.1206(b)(5). (7) Notification and documentation of any change in information already provided under §63.9 as specified in §63.9(j).

• The permittee must submit the following notifications to the Administrator if the permittee requests or elects to comply with alternative requirements: (§63.1210(a)(2)) (1) The permittee may request an extension of the compliance date for up to one (1) year as specified in §63.1206(b)(5), §63.1213, §63.6(i) and §63.9(c). (2) The permittee may request an adjustment to time periods or postmark deadlines for submittal and review of required information as specified in §63.9(i). (3) The permittee may request approval of the following as specified in §63.1209(g)(1): (i) Alternative monitoring methods, except for standards that the permittee must monitor with a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) and except for requests to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limits; or (ii) A waiver of an operating parameter limit. (4) The permittee may request the following as specified in §63.1209(a)(5) and §63.8(f): (i) Approval of alternative monitoring methods for compliance with standards that are monitored with a CEMS; and (ii) Approval to use a CEMS in lieu of operating parameter limits. (5) Notification that the permittee elects to comply with the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns with in-line raw mills as specified in §63.1204(d)(2). (6) Notification that the permittee elects to document compliance with all applicable requirements and standards promulgated under authority of the Clean Air Act, including Sections 112 and 129, in lieu of the requirements of Subpart EEE of this Part when not burning hazardous waste as specified in §63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(A). (7) The permittee may request to burn hazardous waste for more than seven hundred twenty (720) hours and for purposes other than testing or pretesting after making a change in the design or operation that could affect compliance with emission standards and prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as specified in §63.1206(b)(5)(i)(C)(2).

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 37 Project No. 031-0021-023

(8) If the permittee elects to conduct particulate matter CEMS correlation testing and wishes to have federal particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits waived during the testing, the permittee must notify the Administrator by submitting the correlation test plan for review and approval as specified in §63.1206(b)(9)(iii)(B). (9) Owners and operators of cement kilns may request approval of alternative emission standards for mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under certain conditions as specified in §63.1206(b)(10). (10) The permittee may request to base initial compliance on data in lieu of a comprehensive performance test as specified in §63.1207(c)(2). (11) The permittee may request more than sixty (60) days to complete a performance test if additional time is needed for reasons beyond the permittee’s control as specified in §63.1207(d)(3). (12) The permittee may request up to a one (1)-year time extension for conducting a performance test (other than the initial comprehensive performance test) to consolidate testing with other state or federally-required testing as specified in §63.1207(i). (13) The permittee may request more than ninety (90) days to submit a Notification of Compliance after completing a performance test if additional time is needed for reasons beyond the permittee’s control as specified in §63.1207(j)(4). (14) After failure of a performance test, the permittee may request to burn hazardous waste for more than seven hundred twenty (720) hours and for purposes other than testing or pretesting as specified in §63.1207(l)(3). (15) The permittee may request to extrapolate mercury feedrate limits as specified in §63.1209(l)(1). (16) The permittee may request to extrapolate semivolatile and low volatile metal feedrate limits as specified in §63.1209(n)(2)(ii). (17) The permittee may request to reduce the frequency of excess emissions and CMS performance reports as specified in §63.10(e)(3)(ii). (18) The permittee may request to waive record keeping or reporting requirements as specified in §63.10(f). (19) The permittee may request to use data compression techniques to record data on a less frequent basis than required by §63.1209 as specified in §63.1211(e).
Record keeping:

• The permittee must retain the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c)) (1) General information required to document and maintain compliance with the regulations of Subpart EEE, including data recorded by continuous monitoring systems (CMS), and copies of all notifications, reports, plan and other documents submitted to the Administrator as specified in §63.1201(a), §63.10(b) and (c). (2) Documentation of compliance as specified in §63.1211(d). (3) Documentation and results of the automatic waste feed cutoff operability testing as specified in §63.1206(c)(3)(vii). (4) Feedstream analysis plan as specified in §63.1209(c)(2). (5) Documentation of compliance with the emission averaging requirements for cement kilns with in-line raw mills as specified in §63.1204(d)(3). (6) If the permittee elects to comply with all applicable requirements and standards promulgated under authority of the Clean Air Act, including Sections 112 and 129, in lieu of the requirements of Subpart EEE when not burning hazardous waste, the permittee must document in the operating record that the permittee is in compliance with those requirements as specified in §63.1206(b)(1)(ii)(B). (7) Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction plan as specified in §63.1206(c)(2). (8) Corrective measure for any automatic waste feed cutoff that results in an exceedance of an emission standard or operating parameter limit as specified in §63.1206(c)(3)(v).

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 38 Project No. 031-0021-023

(9) Operator training and certification program as specified in §63.1206(c)(6).

• If used, documentation that a substitute activated carbon, dioxin/furan formation reaction inhibitor, or dry scrubber sorbent will provide the same level of control as the original material as specified in §63.1209(k)(6)(iii), §63.1209(k)(7)(ii), §63.1209(k)(9)(ii) and §63.1209(o)(4)(iii). Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the following reports to the Administrator: (§63.1211(a)) (1) Compliance progress report associated and submitted with the notification of intent to comply as specified in §63.1211(b). (2) Compliance progress reports, if required as a condition of an extension of the compliance date granted under §63.6(i) as specified in §63.10(d)(4). (3) Excessive exceedances reports as specified in §63.1206(c)(3)(vi). (4) Periodic startup, shutdown and malfunction reports as specified in §63.10(d)(5)(i). (5) Immediate startup, shutdown and malfunction reports as specified in §63.10(d)(5)(ii). (6) Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in §63.10(e)(3). The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW017



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Notification of Intent to Comply (NIC) - §§63.1210(b) and (c), §63.1211(b) and §63.1212
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must prepare a Notification of Intent to Comply that contains the information listed below: (§63.1210(b)(1))

• The permittee must make a draft of the NIC available for public review no later than thirty (30) days prior to the public meeting required under §63.1210(c)(1). (§63.1210(b)(2))

• The permittee must submit the final NIC to the Administrator no later than October 2, 2000. (§63.1210(b)(3))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 39 Project No. 031-0021-023

• NIC public meeting and notice. (§63.1210(c)) (1) Prior to the submission of the NIC to the permitting agency, and no later than July 31, 2000, the permittee must hold at least one (1) informal meeting with the public to discuss anticipated activities described in the draft NIC for achieving compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. The permittee must post a sign-in sheet or otherwise provide a voluntary opportunity for attendees to provide their names and addresses. (§63.1210(c)(1) (2) The permittee must submit a summary of the meeting, along with the list of attendees and their addresses developed under §63.1210(c)(1), and copies of any written comments or materials submitted at the meeting, to the Administrator as part of the final NIC, in accordance with §63.1210(b)(1)(iii). (§63.1210(c)(2)) (3) The permittee must provide public notice of the NIC meeting at least thirty (30) days prior to the meeting. The permittee must provide public notice in all of the following forms: (§63.1210(c)(3)) (i) The permittee must publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or equivalent jurisdiction of the facility. In addition, the permittee must publish the notice in newspapers of general circulation in adjacent counties or equivalent jurisdiction where such publication would be necessary to inform the affected public. The permittee must publish the notice as a display advertisement. (§63.1210(c)(3)(i)) (ii) The permittee must post a notice on a clearly marked sign at or near the source. If the permittee places the sign on the site of the hazardous waste combustor, the sign must be large enough to be readable from the nearest spot where the public would pass by the site. (§63.1210(c)(3)(ii)) (iii) The permittee must broadcast a notice at least once on at least one (1) local radio station or television station. (§63.1210(c)(3)(iii)) (iv) The permittee must provide a copy of the notice to the facility mailing list in accordance with §124.10(c)(1)(ix) of this Chapter. (§63.1210(c)(3)(iv))

• Not later than October 1, 2001, the permittee must comply with the following, unless the permittee complies with §63.1211(b)(2)(ii): (§63.1211(b)(1)) (1) Develop engineering design for any physical modifications to the source needed to comply with the emission standards of this subpart; (§63.1211(b)(1)(i)) (2) Submit applicable construction applications to the Administrator; and (§63.1211(b)(1)(ii)) (3) Document an internal or external commitment of resources, i.e., funds or personnel, to purchase, fabricate, and install any equipment, devices and ancillary structures needed to comply with the emission standards of this subpart. §63.1211(b)(1)(iii))

• If the permittee does not comply with §63.1211(b)(1) or (b)(2)(ii), the permittee must stop burning hazardous waste on or before October 1, 2001. (§63.1211(b)(2)(iii))

• If the permittee signifies in the progress report, submitted not later than October 1, 2001, the intention not to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart, the permittee must stop burning hazardous waste on or before October 1, 2001 and the permittee is exempt from the requirements of §63.1211(b)(1) through (b)(3). (§63.1211(b)(5)(ii))

• The NIC and Progress Report must contain the following certification signed and dated by an authorized representative of the source: I certify under penalty of law that I have personally
examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. (§63.1212(a)(1))

• An authorized representative is the same as a “responsible official” as defined under §63.2. (§63.1212(a)(2))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 40 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the Notification of Compliance and Progress reports in the operating record. (§63.1211(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the Notification of Compliance and Progress Reports on site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request. Reporting: Notification of Intent to Comply

• The Notification of Intent to Comply includes the following information: (§63.1210(b)(1)) (1) General Information: (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)) (i) The name and address of the owner/operator and the source; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(A)) (ii) Whether the source is a major or an area source; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(B)) (iii) Waste minimization and emission control technique(s) being considered; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(C)) (iv) Emission monitoring technique(s) the permittee is considering; (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(D)) (v) Waste minimization and emission control technique(s) effectiveness. (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(E)) (vi) A description of the evaluation criteria used or to be used to select waste minimization and/or emission control technique(s); and (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(F)) (vii) A statement that the permittee intends to comply with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1210(b)(1)(i)(G)) (2) Information on key activities and estimated dates for these activities that will bring the source into compliance with emission control requirements of this subpart. The submission of key activities and dates is not intended to be static and the permittee may revise them during the period the NIC is in effect. The permittee must submit revisions to the Administrator and make them available to the public. The permittee must include the following key activities and dates: (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)) (i) The dates by which the permittee will develop engineering designs for emission control systems or process changes for emissions; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A)) (ii) The date by which the permittee will commit internal or external resources for installing emission control systems or making process changes for emission control, or the date by which the permittee will issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process changes; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(B)) (iii) The date by which the permittee will submit construction applications; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(C)) (iv) The date by which the permittee will initiate on-site construction, installation of emission control equipment, or process change; (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(D)) (v) The date by which the permittee will complete on-site construction, installation of emission control equipment, or process change; and (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(E)) (vi) The date by which the permittee will achieve final compliance. The individual dates and milestones listed in §63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (F) as part of the NIC are not requirements and therefore are not enforceable deadlines; the requirements of §63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (F) must be included as part of the NIC only to inform the public of the permittee’s intention to comply with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1210(b)(1)(ii)(F)) (3) A summary of the public meeting required under §63.1210(c). (§63.1210(b)(1)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 41 Project No. 031-0021-023

(4) If the permittee does not intend to comply, but will not stop burning hazardous waste by October 1, 2001 a certification that: (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)) (i) The permittee will stop burning hazardous waste on or before September 30, 2002; and (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(A)) (ii) It is necessary to combust the hazardous waste from another on-site source, during the year prior to September 30, 2002 because that other source is: (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B)) (A) Installing equipment to come into compliance with the emission standards of this subpart; or (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B)(1)) (B) Installing source reduction modifications to eliminate the need for further combustion of wastes. (§63.1210(b)(1)(iv)(B)(2)) NIC Public Meeting and Notice

• The permittee must include the following in the notices required under §63.1210(c)(3): (§63.1210(c)(4)) (1) The date, time and location of the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(i)) (2) A brief description of the purpose of the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(ii)) (3) A brief description of the source and proposed operations, including the address or a map (e.g., a sketched or copied street map) of the source location: (§63.1210(c)(4)(iii)) (4) A statement encouraging people to contact the source at least 72 hours before the meeting if they need special access to participate in the meeting: (§63.1210(c)(4)(iv)) (5) A statement describing how the draft NIC can be obtained; and (§63.1210(c)(4)(v)) (6) The name, address and telephone number of a contact person for the NIC. (§63.1210(c)(4)(vi)) Progress Reports

• Demonstration: (§63.1211(b)(2)) (1) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a progress report on or before October 1, 2001 which contains information documenting that the permittee has met the requirements of §63.1211(b)(1). This information will be used by the Administrator to determine if the permittee has made adequate progress towards compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. In the evaluation of adequate progress, the Administrator may consider any delays in a source’s progress caused by the time required to obtain necessary permits from governmental regulatory agencies when the sources have submitted timely and complete permit applications. (§63.1211(b)(2)(i)) (2) If the permittee intends to comply with the emission standards of this subpart, but can do so without undertaking any of the activities described in §63.1211(b)(1), the permittee must submit a progress report documenting either: (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii)) (i) That the permittee at the time of the progress report, is in compliance with the emission standards and operating requirements; or (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii)(A)) (ii) The steps the permittee will take to comply, without undertaking any of the activities listed in §63.1211(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii). (§63.1211(b)(2)(ii)(B))

• Schedule: (§63.1211(b)(3)) (1) The permittee must include in the progress report a detailed schedule that lists key dates for all projects that will bring the source into compliance with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart for the time period between submission of the progress report and the compliance date of the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart.(§63.1211(b)(3)(i)) (2) The schedule must contain anticipated or actual dates for the following: (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)) (i) Bid and award dates, as necessary, for construction contracts and equipment supply contractors; (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(A))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 42 Project No. 031-0021-023

(ii) Milestones such as ground breaking, completion of drawings and specifications, equipment deliveries, intermediate construction completions, and testing; (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(B)) (iii) The dates on which applications will be submitted for or operating permits or licenses; (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(C)) (iv) The dates by which approvals of any permits or licenses are anticipated; and (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(D)) (v) The projected date by which the permittee expects to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1211(b)(3)(ii)(E))

• The permittee must include a statement in the progress report that the permittee does intend or does not intend to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart. (§63.1211(b)(4))

• Sources that do not intend to comply - If the permittee indicated in the NIC the intent not to comply with the emission standards and operating requirements of this subpart and stop burning hazardous waste prior to submitting a progress report, or if the permittee meets the requirements of §63.1206(a)(2), the permittee is exempt from the requirements of §63.1211(b)(1) through (b)(4). However, the permittee submit and include in a revised NIC the date on which the permittee stopped burning hazardous waste and the date(s) the permittee submitted or plan to submit RCRA closure documents. (§63.1211(b)(5)(i)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW018



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Documentation of Compliance - §63.1211(d)
Emission Limitation:

• By the compliance date, the permittee must develop and include in the operating record a Documentation of Compliance. (§63.1211(d)(1))

• The permittee must comply with the emission standards and operating parameter limits specified in the Documentation of Compliance. (§63.1211(d)(4)) Monitoring:

None. Record keeping: The permittee shall include in the operating record, the Documentation of Compliance. (§63.1211(d)(1))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 43 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting: Documentation of Compliance

• The Documentation of Compliance must identify the applicable emission standards under this subpart and the limits on the operating parameters under §63.1209 that will ensure compliance with those emission standards. (§63.1211(d)(2))

• The permittee must include a signed and dated certification in the Documentation of Compliance that: (§63.1211(d)(3)) (1) Required CEMs and CMS are installed, calibrated and continuously operating in compliance with the requirements of this subpart; and (§63.1211(d)(3)(i)) (2) Based on an engineering evaluation prepared under the permittee’s direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information and supporting documentation and considering at a minimum the design, operation and maintenance characteristics of the combustor and emissions control equipment, the types, quantities, and characteristics of feedstreams and available emissions data: (§63.1211(d)(3)(ii)) (i) The permittee is in compliance with the emission standards of this subpart; and (§63.1211(d)(3)(ii)(A)) (ii) The limits on the operating parameters under §63.1209 ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1211(d)(3)(ii)(B)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW019



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Data Compression - §63.1211(e)
Emission Limitation: The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for approval to use data compression techniques to record data from CMS, including CEMS, on a frequency less than that required by §63.1209. The permittee must submit the request for review and approval as part of the comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1211(e)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 44 Project No. 031-0021-023

Data Compression:

• The permittee must record a data value at least once each ten (10)minutes. (§63.1211(e)(1))

• For each CEMS or operating parameter for which the permittee request to use data compression techniques, the permittee must recommend: (§63.1211(e)(2)) (1) A fluctuation limit that defines the maximum permissible deviation of a new data value from a previously generated value without requiring the permittee to revert to recording each one (1)-minute value. (§63.1211(e)(2)(i)) (i) If the permittee exceeds a fluctuation limit, the permittee must record each one (1)- minute value for a period of time not less than ten (10)minutes. (§63.1211(e)(2)(i)(A)) (ii) If neither the fluctuation limit nor the data compression limit are exceeded during that period of time, the permittee may reinitiate recording data values on a frequency of at least once each ten (10)minutes; and (§63.1211(e)(2)(i)(B)) (2) A data compression limit defined as the closest level to an operating parameter limit or emission standard at which reduced data recording is allowed. (§63.1211(e)(2)(ii)) (i) Within this level and the operating parameter limit or emission standard, the permittee must record each one (1)-minute average. (§63.1211(e)(2)(ii)(A)) (ii) The data compression limit should reflect a level at which the permittee is unlikely to exceed the specific operating parameter limit or emission standard, considering its averaging period, with the addition of a new one (1)-minute average. (§63.1211(e)(2)(ii)(B)) Record keeping: As required by the data compression techniques. Reporting: The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for approval to use data compression techniques to record data from CMS, including CEMS, on a frequency less than that required by §63.1209. The permittee must submit the request for review and approval as part of the comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1211(e)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 45 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW020



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Comprehensive Performance Tests and Subsequent Testing §63.1207
Emission Limitation:

• The provisions of §63.7 apply, except as noted below: (§63.1207(a))

• Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee must conduct comprehensive performance tests to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards provided by §63.1203, §63.1204, and §63.1205, establish limits for the operating parameters provided by §63.1209, and demonstrate compliance with the performance specifications for continuous monitoring systems. (§63.1207(b)(1))

• Initial Comprehensive Performance Test – Except as provided by §63.1207(c)(2), the permittee must commence the initial comprehensive performance test no later than six (6) months after the compliance date. (§63.1207(c)(1))

• Data in lieu of the Initial Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee may request that previous emissions test data serve as documentation of conformance with the emission standards of this subpart provided that the previous testing was: (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)) (1) Initiated after March 30, 1998; (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(A)) (2) For the purpose of demonstrating emissions under a RCRA permit issuance or reissuance proceeding under Part 270 of this Chapter; (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(B)) (3) In conformance with the requirements of paragraph §63.1207(g)(1); and (§63.1207(c)(2)(i)(C)) (4) Sufficient to establish the applicable operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1207(c)(2)(i))(D))

• The permittee must submit data in lieu of the initial comprehensive performance test in lieu of or with the notification of performance test required under §63.1207(e). (§63.1207(c)(2)(ii))

• Frequency of Testing – The permittee must conduct testing periodically as prescribed below. The date of commencement of the initial comprehensive performance test is the basis for establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next comprehensive performance test. The permittee may conduct performance testing at any time prior to the required date. The deadline for commencing subsequent confirmatory and comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement of the previous comprehensive performance test. Unless the Administrator grants a time extension under §63.1207(i), the testing must be conducted as follows: (§63.1207(d)) (1) Comprehensive Performance Testing – The permittee must commence testing no later than sixty-one (61) months after the date of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test. If the permittee submits data in lieu of the initial performance test, the permittee must commence the subsequent comprehensive performance test within sixty-one (61) months of commencing the test used to provide the data in lieu of the initial performance test. (§63.1207(d)(1)) (2) Duration of Testing – The permittee must complete performance testing within sixty (60) days after the date of commencement, unless the Administrator determines that a time extension is warranted based on the documentation in writing of factors beyond your control that prevent you from meeting the sixty (60) day deadline. (§63.1207(d)(3))

• If the permittee fails to postmark a Notification of Compliance by the specified date, the permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately. (§63.1207(k)(1))

• Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(k)(3), the permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or comprehensive performance testing and only for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator). (§63.1207(k)(2))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 46 Project No. 031-0021-023

• §63.1209(j) through (p) require the permittee to establish limits on operating parameters based on comprehensive performance testing to ensure the permittee maintains compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. For several parameters, the permittee must establish a limit for the parameter to ensure compliance with more than one (1) emission standard. An example is a limit on minimum combustion chamber temperature to ensure compliance with both the DRE standards of §63.1209(j) and the dioxin/furan standard of §63.1209(k). If the performance tests for such standards are not performed simultaneously, the most stringent limit for a parameter derived from independent performance tests applies. (§63.1209(i)) Notification of Compliance

• The Notification of Compliance status requirements of §63.9(h) apply, except that: (§63.1210(d)(1)) (1) The notification is a Notification of Compliance, rather than compliance status: (§63.1210(d)(1)(i)) (2) The notification is required for the initial comprehensive performance test and each subsequent comprehensive and confirmatory performance test; and (§63.1210(d)(1)(ii)) (3) The permittee must postmark the notification before the close of business on the 90 th day following completion of relevant compliance demonstration activity specified in this subpart rather than the 60 th day as required by §63.9(h)(2)(ii). (§63.1210(d)(1)(iii))

• Upon postmark of the Notification of Compliance, the operating parameter limits identified in the Notification of Compliance, as applicable, shall be complied with, the limits identified in the Documentation of Compliance or a previous Notification of Compliance are no longer applicable. (§63.1210(d)(2))

• The Notification of Compliance requirements of §63.1207(j) also apply. (§63.1210(d)(3))
Test Plan:

• Content of Performance Test Plan - The provisions of §63.7(c)(2)(i)-(iii) and (v) regarding the content of the test plan apply. In addition, the permittee must include the following information in the test plan: (§63.1207(f)) Comprehensive Performance Test Plan:

• An analysis of each feedstream, including hazardous waste, other fuels, and industrial furnace feedstocks, as fired, that includes: (§63.1207(f)(1)(i)) (1) Heating value, levels of semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, mercury and total chlorine (organic and inorganic); and (§63.1207(f)(1)(i)(A)) (2) Viscosity or description of the physical form of the feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(i)(B))

• For organic hazardous air pollutants established by 42 U.S.C. 7412(b)(1), excluding caprolactam (CAS number 105602) as provided by §63.60: (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)) (1) An identification of such organic hazardous air pollutants that are present in the feedstream, except that the permittee need not analyze for organic hazardous air pollutants that would reasonably not be expected to be found in the feedstream. The permittee must identify any constituents you exclude from analysis and explain the basis for excluding them. The permittee must conduct the feedstream analysis according to §63.1208(b)(8).; (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(A)) (i) The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the permittee’s responsibility to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise and that the results are representative of the feedstream. (§63.1208(b)(8))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 47 Project No. 031-0021-023

(2) An approximate quantification of such identified organic hazardous air pollutants in the feedstreams, within the precision produced by the analytical procedures of §63.1208(b)(8); and (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(B)) (i) The permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8))

1. Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i))

2. The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – PracticalMethods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii)) (3) A description of blending procedures, if applicable, prior to firing the feedstream, including a detailed analysis of the materials prior to blending and blending ratios; (§63.1207(f)(1)(ii)(C))

• A detailed engineering description of the hazardous waste combustor, including: (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)) (1) Manufacturer’s name and model number of the hazardous waste combustor; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A)) (2) Type of hazardous waste combustor; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(B)) (3) Maximum design capacity in appropriate units; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(C)) (4) Description of the feed system for each feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(D)) (5) Capacity of each feed system; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(E)) (6) Description of automatic hazardous waste feed cutoff system(s); (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(F)) (7) Description of the design, operation and maintenance practices for any air pollution control system; and (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(G)) (8) Description of the design, operation, and maintenance practices of any stack gas monitoring and pollution control monitoring systems; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(H))

• A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedure including sampling and monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis; (§63.1207(f)(1)(iv))

• A detailed test schedule for each hazardous waste for which the performance test is planned, including date(s), duration, quantity of hazardous waste to be burned, and other relevant factors; (§63.1207(f)(1)(v))

• A detailed test protocol, including, for each hazardous waste identified, the ranges of hazardous waste feedrate for each feed system, and, as appropriate, the feedrates of other fuels and feedstocks, and any other relevant parameters that may affect the ability of the hazardous waste combustor to meet the emission standards; (§63.1207(f)(1)(vi))

• A description of, and planned operating conditions for, any emission control equipment that will be used; (§63.1207(f)(1)(vii))

• Procedures for rapidly stopping the hazardous waste feed and controlling emissions in the event of an equipment malfunction; (§63.1207(f)(1)(viii))

• A determination of the hazardous waste residence time as required by §63.1206(b)(11); (§63.1207(f)(1)(ix))

• If the permittee is requesting to extrapolate metal feedrate limits from comprehensive performance test levels under §§63.1209(l)(1)(i) or 63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A): (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)) (1) A description of the extrapolation methodology and rationale for how the approach ensures compliance with the emission standards; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(A)) (2) Documentation of the historical range of normal (i.e., other than during compliance testing) metals feedrates for each feedstream; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(B)) (3) Documentation that the level of spiking recommended during the performance test will mask sampling and analysis imprecision and inaccuracy to the extent that extrapolation of feedrates and emission rates from performance test data will be as accurate and precise as if full spiking were used; (§63.1207(f)(1)(x)(C))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 48 Project No. 031-0021-023

• If the permittee does not continuously monitor regulated constituents in natural gas, process air feedstreams, and feedstreams from vapor recovery systems under §63.1209(c)(5), the permittee must include documentation of the expected levels of regulated constituents in those feedstreams; (§63.1207(f)(1)(xi))

• Documentation justifying the duration of system conditioning required to ensure the combustor has achieved steady-state operations under performance test operating conditions, as provided by §63.1207(g)(1)(iii); and (§63.1207(f)(1)(xii))

• For cement kilns with in-line raw mills, if the permittee elects to use the emissions averaging provision of §63.1204(d), the permittee must notify the Administrator of the intent in the initial (and subsequent) comprehensive performance test plan and provide the information required under §63.1204(d)(ii)(B). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xiii)

• If the permittee is not required to conduct performance testing to document compliance with the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards under §63.1207(m), the permittee must include with the comprehensive performance test plan documentation of compliance with the provisions of §63.1207(m). (§63.1207(f)(xvi))

• If the permittee propose to use a surrogate for measuring or monitoring gas flowrate, the permittee must document in the comprehensive performance test plan that the surrogate adequately correlates with gas flowrate, as required by §63.1207(m)(7) and §63.1209(j)(2), (k)(3), (m)(2)(i), (m)(5)(i) and (o)(2)(i). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xvii))

• The permittee must submit an application to request alternative monitoring under §63.1209(g)(1) not later than with the comprehensive performance test plan, as required by §63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(A). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xviii))

• The permittee must document the temperature location measurement in the comprehensive performance test plan, as required by §§63.1209(j)(1)(i) and 63.1209(k)(2)(i). (§63.1207(f)(1)(xix))

• Such other information as the Administrator reasonably finds necessary to determine whether to approve the performance test plan. (§63.1207(f)(1)(xxvi))

Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 49 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must calculate the hazardous waste residence time and include the calculation in the performance test plan under §63.1207(f) and the operating record. The permittee must also provide the hazardous waste residence time in the Documentation of Compliance under §63.1211(d) and the Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d). (§63.1206(b)(11))

• The permittee must conduct a minimum of three (3) runs of a performance test required under §63.1207 to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1206(b)(12)(i))

• The permittee must document compliance with the emission standards based on the arithmetic average of the emission results of each run, except that the permittee must document compliance with the destruction and removal efficiency standard for each run of the comprehensive performance test individually. (§63.1206(b)(12)(ii))

• Changes in design, operation or maintenance – The permittee must conduct a comprehensive performance test under the requirements of §§63.1207(f)(1) and (g)(1) to document compliance with the affected emission standard(s) and establish operating parameter limits are required under §63.1209, and submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d); and (§63.1206(b)(5)(i)(B))

• The permittee must comply with the provisions of §63.7(e). Conducting performance testing under operating conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is consistent with the requirements of §63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under representative operating conditions. (§63.1207(g)) Comprehensive Performance Testing:

• Operations During Testing – For the following parameters, the permittee must operate the combustor during the performance test under normal conditions (or conditions that will result in higher than normal emissions): (§63.1207(g)(1)(i)) (1) The permittee must feed normal (or higher) levels of chlorine during the dioxin/furan performance test; (§63.1207(g)(1)(i)(A)) (2) The permittee must conduct the following tests when the particulate matter control device undergoes its normal (or more frequent) cleaning cycle; the particulate matter, semivolatile metal, and low volatile metal performance tests; and the dioxin/furan and mercury performance tests if activated carbon injection or a carbon bed is used. (§63.1207(g)(1)(i)(C))

• Given that the permittee must establish limits for the applicable operating parameters specified in §63.1209 based on operations during the comprehensive performance test, the permittee may conduct testing under two (2) or more operating modes to provide operating flexibility. (§63.1207(g)(1)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 50 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Prior to obtaining performance test data, the permittee must operate under performance test conditions until you reach steady-state operations with respect to emissions of pollutants, the permittee must measure during the performance test and operating parameters under §63.1209 for which you must establish limits. During system conditioning, the permittee must ensure that each operating parameter for which you must establish a limit is held at the level planned for the performance test. The permittee must include documentation in the performance test plan under §63.1207(f) justifying the duration of system conditioning. (§63.1207(g)(1)(iii)(A) Subsequent Testing:

• Current operating parameter limits established under §63.1209 are waived during subsequent comprehensive performance testing under an approved test plan. (§63.1207(h)(1))

• Current operating parameter limits are also waived during pretesting prescribed in the approved test plan prior to comprehensive performance testing for an aggregate time not to exceed seven hundred twenty (720) hours of operation (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator). Pretesting means: (§63.1207(h)(2)) (1) Operations when stack emissions testing for dioxin/furan, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, particulate matter, or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas is being performed; and (§63.1207(h)(2)(i)) (2) Operations to reach steady-state operating conditions prior to stack emissions testing under §63.1207(g)(1)(iii). (§63.1207(h)(2)(ii)) Failure of Performance Test:

• If the permittee determines (based on CEM recordings, results of analyses of stack samples, or results of CMS performance evaluations) that the permittee has exceeded any emission standard during a comprehensive performance test for a mode of operation, the permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately under that mode of operation. The permittee must make this determination within ninety (90) days following completion of the performance test. (§63.1207(l)(1)(i))

• If the permittee has failed to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for any mode of operation: (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)) (1) Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(C), the permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or comprehensive performance testing under revised operating conditions, and only for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator), except as provided by §63.1207(l)(3); (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii )(A)) (2) The permittee must conduct a comprehensive performance test under revised operating conditions following the requirements for performance testing of this section; and (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(B)) (3) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance subsequent to the new comprehensive performance test. (§63.1207(l)(1)(ii)(C))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous waste in the interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than testing or pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on operating parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart based on available information including data from the failed performance test. The Administrator will review, modify as necessary, and approve if warranted the interim operating requirements. An approval of interim operating requirements will include a schedule for submitting a Notification of Compliance. (§63.1207(l)(3))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 51 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c)) (1) Intent to conduct a comprehensive performance test; (2) CMS performance evaluation; (3) Site-specific test plan; (4) CMS performance evaluation plan; (5) Public notice for the approved test and CMS performance evaluation plans; (6) Comprehensive performance test plan results; (7) CMS performance evaluation; (8) Extension requests for performance testing; (9) Approval/denial for the extension requests for performance testing; (10) Notification of Compliance; (11) Extension request for the Notification of Compliance; and (12) Approval/denial for the extension request for Notification of compliance.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The provisions of §63.7(b) and (c) and §63.8(e) apply, except: (§63.1207(e)(1))

• Comprehensive Performance Test – The permittee must submit to the Administrator a notification of intent to conduct a comprehensive performance test and CMS performance evaluation and a site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan at least one (1) year before the performance test and performance evaluation are scheduled to begin. (§63.1207(e)(1)(i) (1) The Administrator will notify the permittee of approval or intent to deny approval of the site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan within nine (9) months after receipt of the original plan. (§63.1207(e)(1)(i)(A)) (2) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a notification of your intention to conduct the comprehensive performance test at least sixty (60) calendar days before the test is scheduled to begin. (§63.1207(e)(1)(i)(B))

• After the Administrator has approved the site-specifc test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan, the permittee must make the test plans available to the public for review. The permittee must issue a public notice announcing the approval of the test plans and the location where the test plans are available for review. (§63.1207(e)(2))

• After the initial comprehensive performance test, the permittee may request up to a one (1)- year time extension for conducting a comprehensive or confirmatory performance test to consolidate performance testing with other state or federally required emission testing, or for other reasons deemed acceptable by the Administrator. If the Administrator grants a time extension for a comprehensive performance test, the deadlines for commencing the next comprehensive and confirmatory tests are based on the date that the subject comprehensive performance test commences. (§63.1207(i)) (1) The permittee must submit in writing to the Administrator any request under §63.1207(i) for a time extension for conducting a performance test. (§63.1207(i)(1)) (2) The permittee must include in the request for an extension for conducting a performance test the following: (§63.1207(i)(2)) (i) A description of the reasons for requesting the time extension; (§63.1207(i)(2)(i)) (ii) The date by which the permittee will commence performance testing. (§63.1207(i)(2)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 52 Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of approval or intention to deny approval of your request for an extension for conducting a performance test within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of sufficient information to evaluate your request. The thirty (30) day approval or denial period will begin after you have been notified in writing that your application is complete. The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing whether the application contains sufficient information to make a determination within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the original application and within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information that you submit. (§63.1207(i)(3)) (4) When notifying the permittee that the application is not complete, the Administrator will specify the information needed to complete the application. The Administrator will also provide notice of opportunity for the permittee to present, in writing, within thirty (30) calendar days after notification of the incomplete application, additional information or arguments to the Administrator to enable further action on the application. (§63.1207(i)(4)) (5) Before denying any request for an extension for performance testing, the Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of the Administrator’s intention to issue the denial, together with: (§63.1207(i)(5)) (i) Notice of information and findings on which the intended denial is base; and (§63.1207(i)(5)(i)) (ii) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present in writing, within fifteen (15) calendar days after notification of the intended denial, additional information or arguments to the Administrator before further action on the request. (§63.1207(i)(5)(ii)) (6) The Administrator’s final determination to deny any request for an extension will be in writing and will set forth specific grounds upon which the denial is based. The final determination will be made within thirty (30) calendar days after the presentation of additional information or argument (if the application is complete), or within thirty (30) days after the final date specified for the presentation if no presentation is made. (§63.1207(i)(6))

• Notification of Compliance – Comprehensive Performance Test – Within ninety (90) days of completion of a comprehensive performance test, the permittee must postmark a Notification of Compliance documenting compliance or noncompliance with the emission standards and continuous monitoring system requirements, and identifying operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1207(j)(1)(i))

• Notification of Compliance – Comprehensive Performance Test - Upon postmark of the Notification of Compliance, the permittee must comply with all operating requirements specified in the Notification of Compliance in lieu of the limits specified in the Documentation of Compliance required under §63.1211(d). (§63.1207(j)(1)(ii))

• See §§63.7(g), 63.9(h) and 63.1210(d) for additional requirements pertaining to the Notification of Compliance (e.g., the permittee must include results of performance tests in the Notification of Compliance). (§63.1207(j)(3))

• Time extension – The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for a time extension documenting that, for reasons beyond your control, the permittee may not be able to meet the ninety (90) day deadline for submitting the Notification of Compliance after completion of testing. The Administrator will determine whether a time extension is warranted. (§63.1207(j)(4))

• Failure to Submit Timely Notification of Compliance – The permittee must submit to the Administrator a Notification of compliance subsequent to a new comprehensive performance test before resuming hazardous waste burning. (§63.1207(k)(3)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 53 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW021



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Confirmatory Performance Tests §63.1207
Emission Limitation:

• The provisions of §63.7 apply, except as noted below: (§63.1207(a))

• Confirmatory Performance Test – The permittee must conduct confirmatory performance tests

to: (1) Demonstrate compliance with the dioxin/furan emission standard when the source operates under normal operating conditions; and (§63.1207(b)(2)(i)) (2) Conduct a performance evaluation of continuous monitoring systems required for compliance assurance with the dioxin/furan emission standard under §63.1209(k). (§63.1207(b)(2)(ii))

• Frequency of Testing – The permittee must conduct testing periodically as prescribed below. The date of commencement of the initial comprehensive performance test is the basis for establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next comprehensive performance test. The permittee may conduct performance testing at any time prior to the required date. The deadline for commencing subsequent confirmatory and comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement of the previous comprehensive performance test. Unless the Administrator grants a time extension under §63.1207(i), the testing must be conducted as follows: (§63.1207(d))

• Confirmatory Performance Testing – The permittee must commence confirmatory performance testing no later than thirty-one (31) months after the date of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test. If the permittee submits data in lieu of the initial performance test, the permittee must commence the initial confirmatory performance test within thirty-one (31) months of the date six (6) months after the compliance date. To ensure that the confirmatory test is conducted approximately midway between comprehensive performance tests, the Administrator will not approve a test plan the schedules testing within eighteen (18) months of commencing the previous comprehensive performance test. (§63.1207(d)(2))

• Duration of Testing – The permittee must complete performance testing within sixty (60) days after the date of commencement, unless the Administrator determines that a time extension is warranted based on the documentation in writing of factors beyond your control that prevent you from meeting the sixty (60) day deadline. (§63.1207(d)(3))

• If the permittee fails to postmark a Notification of Compliance by the specified date, the permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately. (§63.1207(k)(1))

• Prior to submitting a revised Notification of Compliance as provided by §63.1207(k)(3), the permittee may burn hazardous waste only for the purpose of pretesting or comprehensive performance testing and only for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator). (§63.1207(k)(2))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 54 Project No. 031-0021-023

Notification of Compliance

• The Notification of Compliance status requirements of §63.9(h) apply, except that: (§63.1210(d)(1)) (1) The notification is a Notification of Compliance, rather than compliance status: (§63.1210(d)(1)(i)) (2) The notification is required for the initial comprehensive performance test and each subsequent comprehensive and confirmatory performance test; and (§63.1210(d)(1)(ii)) (3) The permittee must postmark the notification before the close of business on the 90 th day following completion of relevant compliance demonstration activity specified in this subpart
rather than the 60 th day as required by §63.9(h)(2)(ii). (§63.1210(d)(1)(iii))

• Upon postmark of the Notification of Compliance, the operating parameter limits identified in the Notification of Compliance, as applicable, shall be complied with, the limits identified in the Documentation of Compliance or a previous Notification of Compliance are no longer applicable. (§63.1210(d)(2))

• The Notification of Compliance requirements of §63.1207(j) also apply. (§63.1210(d)(3))
Test Plan:

• Content of Performance Test Plan - The provisions of §63.7(c)(2)(i)-(iii) and (v) regarding the content of the test plan apply. In addition, the permittee must include the following information in the test plan: (§63.1207(f)) Confirmatory Test Plan:

• A description of the normal hydrocarbon or carbon monoxide operating levels, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(i), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(i))

• A description of the normal applicable operating parameter levels, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(ii), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(ii))

• A description of the normal chlorine operating levels, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(iii), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(iii))

• If the permittee uses carbon injection or a carbon bed, a description of the normal cleaning cycle of the particulate matter control device, as specified in §63.1207(g)(2)(iv), and an explanation of how these normal levels were determined; (§63.1207(f)(2)(iv))

• A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedures including sampling and monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring frequency, and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis; (§63.1207(f)(2)(v))

• A detailed test schedule for each hazardous waste for which the performance test is planned, including date(s), duration, quantity of hazardous waste to be burned, and other relevant factors; (§63.1207(f)(2)(vi))

• A detailed test protocol, including, for each hazardous waste identified, the ranges of hazardous waste feedrate for each feed system, and, as appropriate, the feedrates of other fuels and feedstocks, and any other relevant parameters that may affect the ability of the hazardous waste combustor to meet the dioxin/furan emission standard; (§63.1207(f)(2)(vii)

• A description of, and planned operating conditions for, any emission control equipment that will be used; (§63.1207(f)(2)(viii))

• Procedures for rapidly stopping the hazardous waste feed and controlling emissions in the event of an equipment malfunction; and (§63.1207(f)(2)(ix))

• Such other information as the Administrator reasonably finds necessary to determine whether to approve the confirmatory test plan. (§63.1207(f)(2)(x))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 55 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee must calculate the hazardous waste residence time and include the calculation in the performance test plan under §63.1207(f) and the operating record. The permittee must also provide the hazardous waste residence time in the Documentation of Compliance under §63.1211(d) and the Notification of Compliance under §§63.1207(j) and 63.1210(d). (§63.1206(b)(11))

• The permittee must conduct a minimum of three (3) runs of a performance test required under §63.1207 to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1206(b)(12)(i))

• The permittee must document compliance with the emission standards based on the arithmetic average of the emission results of each run, except that the permittee must document compliance with the destruction and removal efficiency standard for each run of the comprehensive performance test individually. (§63.1206(b)(12)(ii))

• The permittee must comply with the provisions of §63.7(e). Conducting performance testing under operating conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions is consistent with the requirements of §63.7(e)(1) to conduct performance testing under representative operating conditions. (§63.1207(g)) Confirmatory Performance Testing:

• The permittee must conduct confirmatory performance testing for dioxin/furan under normal operating conditions for the following parameters: (§63.1207(g)(2)) (1) Carbon monoxide (or hydrocarbon) CEMS emission levels must be within the range of the average value to the maximum value allowed. The average value is defined as the sum of the hourly rolling average values recorded (each minute) over the previous twelve (12) months divided by the number of rolling averages recorded during that time; (§63.1207(g)(2)(i)) (2) Each operating limit (specified in §63.1209) established to maintain compliance with the dioxin/furan emission standard must be held within the range of the average value over the previous twelve (12) months and the maximum or minimum, as appropriate, that is allowed. The average value is defined as the sum of the rolling average values recorded over the previous twelve (12) months divided by the number of rolling average recorded during that time. The average value must not include calibration data, malfunction data, and data obtained when not burning hazardous waste; (§63.1207(g)(2)(ii)) (3) The permittee must feed chlorine at normal feedrates or greater; and (§63.1207(g)(2)(iii)) (4) If the combustor is equipped with carbon injection or carbon bed, normal cleaning cycle of the particulate matter control device. (§63.1207(g)(2)(iv))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 56 Project No. 031-0021-023

Failure of Performance Test:

• If the permittee determines (based on CEM recordings, results of analyses of stack samples, or results of CMS performance evaluations) that the permittee has failed the dioxin/furan emission standard during a confirmatory performance test, the permittee must cease hazardous waste burning immediately. The permittee must make this determination within ninety (90) days following completion of the performance test. To burn hazardous waste in the future: (§63.1207(l)(2)) (1) The permittee must submit to the Administrator for review and approval a test plan to conduct a comprehensive performance test to identify revised limits on the applicable dioxin/furan operating parameters specified in §63.1209(k); (§63.1207(l)(2)(i)) (2) The permittee must submit to the Administrator a Notification of Compliance with the dioxin/furan emission standard under the provisions of §63.1207(j), (k) and (l). The permittee must include in the Notification of Compliance the revised limits on the applicable dioxin/furan operating parameters specified in §63.1209(k); and (§63.1207(l)(2)(ii)) (3) Until the Notification of Compliance is submitted, the permittee must not burn hazardous waste except for purposes of pretesting or confirmatory performance testing, and for a maximum of seven hundred twenty (720) hours (renewable at the discretion of the Administrator), except as provided by §63.1207(l)(3); (§63.1207(l)(2)(iii))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to obtain written approval to burn hazardous waste in the interim prior to submitting a Notification of Compliance for purposes other than testing or pretesting. The permittee must specify operating requirements, including limits on operating parameters, that the permittee determines will ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart based on available information including data from the failed performance test. The Administrator will review, modify as necessary, and approve if warranted the interim operating requirements. An approval of interim operating requirements will include a schedule for submitting a Notification of Compliance. (§63.1207(l)(3)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the following in the operating record: (§63.1211(c)) (1) Intent to conduct a confirmatory performance test; (2) CMS performance evaluation; (3) Site-specific test plan; (4) CMS performance evaluation plan; (5) Public notice for the approved test and CMS performance evaluation plans; (6) Confirmatory performance test plan results; (7) CMS performance evaluation; (8) Extension requests for performance testing; (9) Approval/denial for the extension requests for performance testing; (10) Notification of Compliance; (11) Extension request for the Notification of Compliance; and (12) Approval/denial for the extension request for Notification of compliance.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 57 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The provisions of §63.7(b) and (c) and §63.8(e) apply, except: (§63.1207(e)(1))

• Confirmatory Performance Test – The permittee must submit to the Administrator a notification of intent to conduct a confirmatory performance test and CMS performance evaluation and site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation plan at least sixty (60) calendar days before the performance test is scheduled to begin. The Administrator will notify the permittee of approval or intent to deny approval of the site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the original test plans. (§63.1207(e)(1)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 58 Project No. 031-0021-023

• After the Administrator has approved the site-specific test plan and CMS performance evaluation test plan, the permittee must make the test plans available to the public for review. The permittee must issue a public notice announcing the approval of the test plans and the location where the test plans are available for review. (§63.1207(e)(2))

• After the initial comprehensive performance test, the permittee may request up to a one (1)- year time extension for conducting a comprehensive or confirmatory performance test to consolidate performance testing with other state or federally required emission testing, or for other reasons deemed acceptable by the Administrator. If the Administrator grants a time extension for a comprehensive performance test, the deadlines for commencing the next comprehensive and confirmatory tests are based on the date that the subject comprehensive performance test commences. (§63.1207(i)) (1) The permittee must submit in writing to the Administrator any request under §63.1207(i) for a time extension for conducting a performance test. (§63.1207(i)(1)) (2) The permittee must include in the request for an extension for conducting a performance test the following: (§63.1207(i)(2)) (i) A description of the reasons for requesting the time extension; (§63.1207(i)(2)(i)) (ii) The date by which the permittee will commence performance testing. (§63.1207(i)(2)(ii)) (3) The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of approval or intention to deny approval of your request for an extension for conducting a performance test within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of sufficient information to evaluate your request. The thirty (30) day approval or denial period will begin after you have been notified in writing that your application is complete. The Administrator will notify the permittee in writing whether the application contains sufficient information to make a determination within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the original application and within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information that you submit. (§63.1207(i)(3)) (4) When notifying the permittee that the application is not complete, the Administrator will specify the information needed to complete the application. The Administrator will also provide notice of opportunity for the permittee to present, in writing, within thirty (30) calendar days after notification of the incomplete application, additional information or arguments to the Administrator to enable further action on the application. (§63.1207(i)(4)) (5) Before denying any request for an extension for performance testing, the Administrator will notify the permittee in writing of the Administrator’s intention to issue the denial, together with: (§63.1207(i)(5)) (i) Notice of information and findings on which the intended denial is base; and (§63.1207(i)(5)(i)) (ii) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present in writing, within fifteen (15) calendar days after notification of the intended denial, additional information or arguments to the Administrator before further action on the request. (§63.1207(i)(5)(ii)) (6) The Administrator’s final determination to deny any request for an extension will be in writing and will set forth specific grounds upon which the denial is based. The final determination will be made within thirty (30) calendar days after the presentation of additional information or argument (if the application is complete), or within thirty (30) days after the final date specified for the presentation if no presentation is made. (§63.1207(i)(6))

• Notification of Compliance – Confirmatory Performance Test - Except as provided by §63.1207(j)(4), within ninety (90) days of completion of a confirmatory performance test, the permittee must postmark a Notification of Compliance documenting compliance or noncompliance with the applicable dioxin/furan emission standard. (§63.1207(j)(2))

• See §§63.7(g), 63.9(h) and 63.1210(d) for additional requirements pertaining to the Notification of Compliance (e.g., the permittee must include results of performance tests in the Notification of Compliance). (§63.1207(j)(3))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 59 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Time extension – The permittee may submit a written request to the Administrator for a time extension documenting that, for reasons beyond your control, the permittee may not be able to meet the ninety (90) day deadline for submitting the Notification of Compliance after completion of testing. The Administrator will determine whether a time extension is warranted. (§63.1207(j)(4)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW022



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Waiver of Performance Test §63.1207
Emission Limitation:

• The waiver provision of §63.1207(m) applies in addition to the provisions of §63.7(h). (§63.1207(m)(1))

• The permittee is not required to conduct performance tests to document compliance with the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards under the conditions specified below. The permittee is deemed to be in compliance with an emission standard if the twelve (12)-hour rolling average maximum theoretical emission concentration (MTEC) determined as specified below does not exceed the emission standard: (§63.1207(m)(2)) (1) Determine the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, or total chlorine and chloride from all feedstreams; (§63.1207(m)(2)(i)) (2) Determine the stack gas flowrate; and (§63.1207(m)(2)(ii)) (3) Calculate a MTEC for each standard assuming all mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, or total chlorine (organic and inorganic) from all feedstreams is emitted; (§63.1207(m)(2)(iii)) Monitoring:

• To document compliance with this provision, the permittee must: (§63.1207(m)(3)) (1) Monitor and record the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and total chlorine and chloride from all feedstreams according to §63.1209(c); (§63.1207(m)(3)(i)) (2) Monitor with a CMS and record in the operating record the gas flowrate (either directly or by monitoring a surrogate parameter that you have correlated to gas flowrate); (§63.1207(m)(3)(ii)) (3) Continuously calculate and record in the operating record the MTEC under the procedures of §63.1207(m)(2); and (§63.1207(m)(3)(iii)) (4) Interlock the MTEC calculated in §63.1207(m)(2)(iii) to the AWFCO system to stop hazardous waste burning when the MTEC exceeds the emission standard. (§63.1207(m)(3)(iv))

• In lieu of the requirement in §63.1207(m)(3)(iii) and (iv), the permittee may: (§63.1207(m)(4)) (1) Identify in the notification of compliance a minimum gas flowrate limit and a maximum feedrate limit of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and/or total chlorine and chloride from all feedstreams that ensures the MTEC as calculated in §63.1207(m)(2)(iii) is below the applicable emission standard; and (§63.1207(m)(4)(i)) (2) Interlock the minimum gas flowrate limit and maximum feedrate limit in §63.1207(m)(3)(iv) to the AWFCO system to stop hazardous waste burning when the gas flowrate or mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and/or total chlorine and chloride feedrate exceeds the limit in §63.1207(m)(4)(i). (§63.1207(m)(4)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 60 Project No. 031-0021-023

• When the permittee determines the feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals or total chlorine and chloride for purposes of this provision, except as provided by §63.1207(m)(6), the permittee must assume that the analyte is present at the full detection limit when the feedstream analysis determines that the analyte is not detected in the feedstream. (§63.1207(m)(5))

• Owners and operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns may assume that mercury is present in raw material at half the detection limit when the raw material feedstream analysis determines that mercury is not detected. (§63.1207(m)(6)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 61 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall specify the method used for determining compliance with the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards.

• If the permittee complies with the requirements under §63.1207(m), the permittee shall
maintain records of: (1) The feedrate of mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals and total chlorine and chloride from all feedstreams; (2) The gas flowrate (either directly or by monitoring a surrogate parameter) in the operating record; (3) The MTEC in the operating record; and (4) When the AWFCO system is not burning hazardous waste due to an MTEC exceedance or a gas flowrate exceedance.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring system.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee must state in the site-specific test plan that the permittee submits for review and approval under §63.1207(e) that the permittee intends to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. The permittee must include in the test plan documentation that any surrogate that is proposed for gas flowrate adequately correlates with the gas flowrate. (§63.1207(m)(7))

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW005. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 62 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW023



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Feedrate Limits for Nondetectable Constituents - §63.1207(n)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must establish separate semivolatile metal, low volatile metal, mercury, and total chlorine (organic and inorganic) and/or ash feedrate limits for each feedstream for which the comprehensive performance test feedstream analysis determines that these constituents are not present at detectable levels. (§63.1207(n)(1))

• The permittee must define the feedrate limits established under §63.1207(n)(1) as nondetect at the full detection limit achieved during the performance test. (§63.1207(n)(2))

• Prior to feeding the material, the permittee must obtain an analysis of each feedstream that is sufficient to document compliance with the applicable feedrate limits provided by this section. (§63.1209(c)(1))

• The permittee must develop and implement a feedstream analysis plan and record it in the operating record. The plan must specify at a minimum: (§63.1209(c)(2)) (1) The parameters for which the permittee will analyze each feedstream to ensure compliance with the operating parameter limits; (§63.1209(c)(2)(i)) (2) Whether the permittee will obtain the analysis by performing sampling and analysis or by other methods, such as using analytical information obtained from others or using other published or documented data or information; (§63.1209(c)(2)(ii)) (3) How the permittee will use the analysis to document compliance with applicable feedrate limits (e.g., if the permittee blends hazardous wastes and obtains analyses of the waste prior to blending but not of the blended, as-fired, waste, the plan must describe how the permittee will determine the pertinent parameters of the blended waste); (§63.1209(c)(2)(iii)) (4) The test methods which the permittee will use to obtain the analyses; (§63.1209(c)(2)(iv)) (5) The sampling method which the permittee will use to obtain a representative sample of each feedstream to be analyzed using sampling methods described in Appendix I, Part 26, of Chapter 40, or an equivalent method; and (§63.1209(c)(2)(v)) (6) The frequency with which the permittee will review or repeat the initial analysis of the feedstream to ensure that the analysis is accurate and up to date. (§63.1209(c)(2)(vi))

• The permittee is not required to monitor levels of metals or chlorine in the following feedstreams to document compliance with the feedrate limits provided that the permittee document in the comprehensive performance test plan the expected levels of the constituent in the feedstream and account for those assumed feedrate levels in documenting compliance with feedrate limits: natural gas, process air and feedstreams from vapor recovery systems. (§63.1209(c)(5))

• The requirements of §§63.8(d) (Quality control program) and (e) (Performance evaluation of continuous monitoring systems) apply, except that the permittee must conduct performance evaluations of components of the CMS under the frequency and procedures (for example, submittal of performance evaluation test plan for review and approval) applicable to performance tests as provided by §63.1207. (§63.1209(d)(1))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 63 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee will not be deemed to be in violation of the feedrate limit established in §63.1207(n)(2) when detectable levels of the constituent are measured, whether at levels above or below the full detection limit achieved during the performance test, provide that: (§63.1207(n)(3)) (1) The total feedrate for that constituent, including the detectable levels in the feedstream which is limited to nondetect levels is below the feedrate limit for that constituent; or (§63.1207(n)(3)(i)) (2) Except for ash, the maximum theoretical emission concentration (MTEC) for the constituent (i.e., semivolatile metal, low volatile metal, mercury, and/or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas) calculated according to §63.1207(m), and considering the contribution from all feedstreams including the detectable levels in the feedstream which is limited to nondetect levels, is below the emission standard in §§63.1203, 63.1204 and 63.1205. (§63.1207(n)(3)(ii))

• To comply with the applicable feedrate limits, the permittee must monitor and record feedrates as follows: (§63.1209(c)(4)) (1) Determine and record the value of the parameter for each feedstream by sampling and analysis or other method; (§63.1209(c)(4)(i)) (2) Determine and record the mass or volume flowrate of each feedstream by a CMS. If the permittee determines flowrate of a feedstream by volume, the permittee must determine and record the density of the feedstream by sampling and analysis (unless the permittee reports the constituent concentration in units of weight per unit volume (e.g., mg/l)); and (§63.1209(c)(4)(ii)) (3) Calculate and record the mass feedrate of the parameter per unit time. (§63.1209(c)(4)(iii))

• Conduct of Monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f))

• The requirements of §63.1211(d), that requires CMSs to be installed, calibrated and operational on the compliance date, shall be complied with instead §63.8(c)(3); (§63.1209(f)(1)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• The permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration or the system: (§63.1209(b)(2))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 64 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must no resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the feedstream analysis plan on site at all times and maintain a copy in the operating record. (§63.1209(c)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the value of the parameter for each feedstream by sampling and analysis or other method; (§63.1209(c)(4)(i))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the mass or volume flowrate of each feedstream by a CMS. If the permittee determines flowrate of a feedstream by volume, the permittee must determine and record the density of the feedstream by sampling and analysis (unless the permittee reports the constituent concentration in units of weight per unit volume (e.g., mg/l); (§63.1209(c)(4)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain a record of the mass feedrate of the parameter per unit time; (§63.1209(c)(4)(iii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring system;

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the feedstream analysis plan to the Administrator for review and approval, if requested. (§63.1209(c)(3))

• The permittee shall place the feedrate limits in the Title V Operating Permit.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW014. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 65 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition PW024



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Alternate Monitoring Requirements Other than Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) - §63.1209(g)
Emission Limitation:

• Requests to use alternative methods. (§63.1209(g)(1)) (1) The permittee may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternative monitoring requirements to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. For requests to use additional CEMS, however, the permittee must use §63.1209(a)(5) and §63.8(f). (§63.1209(g)(1)(i)) (i) The Administrator will not approve averaging periods for operating parameter limits longer than specified unless the permittee documents using data or information that the longer averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the comprehensive performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct three (3) runs of the performance test. (§63.1209(g)(1)(i)(A)) (ii) If the Administrator approves the application to use an alternative monitoring requirement, the permittee must continue to use that alternative monitoring requirement until the permittee receives approval under §63.1209(g)(1) to use another monitoring requirement. (§63.1209(g)(1)(i)(B)) (2) The permittee may submit an application to waive an operating parameter limit based on documentation that neither that operating parameter limit nor an alternative operating parameter limit is needed to ensure compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1209(g)(1)(ii)) (3) The permittee must comply with the procedures for applications submitted under §63.1209(g)(1)(i) and (ii): (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii))

• The Administrator may determine on a case-by-case basis at any time (e.g., during review of the comprehensive performance test plan, during compliance certification review) that the permittee may need to limit additional or alternative operating parameters (e.g., opacity in addition to or in lieu of operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control device) or that alternative approaches to establish limits on operating parameters may be necessary to document compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1209(g)(2)) Monitoring: As required by the alternative monitoring request. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the alternative monitoring application.

• The permittee shall maintain a copy of the alternative monitoring approval or denial.

• As required by the alternative monitoring request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 66 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee must submit the application to the Administrator not later than the comprehensive performance test plan. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(A)

• The permittee must include the following in the application: (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)) (1) Data or information justifying the request for an alternative monitoring requirement (or for a waiver of an operating parameter limit), such as the technical or economic infeasibility or the impracticality of using the required approach; (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(1)) (2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach/technique (e.g., type of detector, monitoring location), the averaging period for the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated; and (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(2)) (3) Data of information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard, or that it is the monitoring requirement that best assures compliance with the standard and that is technically and economically practicable. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(B)(3))

• The Administrator will notify the permittee of approval or intention to deny approval of the request within ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of the original request and within sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information the permittee submits. The Administrator will not approve an alternative monitoring request unless the alternative monitoring requirement provides equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard, or is the monitoring requirement that best assures compliance with the standard and that is technically and economically practicable. Before disapproving any request, the Administrator will notify the permittee of the Administrator’s intention to disapprove the request together with: (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C)) (1) Notice of the information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based; and (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C)(1)) (2) Notice of opportunity for the permittee to present additional information to the Administrator before final action on the request. At the time the Administrator notifies the permittee of intention to disapprove the request, the Administrator will specify how much time the permittee will have after being notified of the intended disapproval to submit the additional information. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(C)(2))

• The permittee is responsible for ensuring that you submit any supplementary and additional information supporting your application in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application during review of the comprehensive performance test plan. Neither the permittee’s submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or disapprove the application, relieves the permittee of the responsibility to comply with the provisions of this subpart. (§63.1209(g)(1)(iii)(D)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition PW025



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Alternate Standards for Existing or New Hazardous Waste Burning Cement Kilns using MACT - §63.1206(b)(10)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 67 Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to recommend alternative semivolatile metal, low volatile metal, mercury or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards if: (§63.1206(b)(10)(i)) (1) The permittee cannot achieve one (1) or more of these standards while using MACT because of the raw material contribution to emissions of the regulated metals or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas; or (§63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A)) (2) The permittee determines that mercury is not present at detectable levels in the raw material. (§63.1206(b)(10)(i)(B))

• The alternative standard that the permittee recommends under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) may be an operating requirement, such as a hazardous waste feedrate limitation for metals and/or chlorine, and/or an emission limitation. (§63.1206(b)(10)(ii))

• The alternative standard must include a requirement to use MACT, or better, applicable to the standard for which the source is seeking relief, as defined in §63.1206(b)(10)(viii) and (ix). (§63.1206(b)(10)(iii))

• The permittee must not operate pursuant to the recommended alternative standards in lieu of emission standards specified in §63.1204(a) and (b): (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii)) (1) Unless the Administrator approves the provisions of the alternative standard petition request or establishes other alternative standards; and (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii)(A)) (2) Until the permittee submits a revised Notification of Compliance that incorporates the revised standards. (§63.1206(b)(10)(vii)(B)) Monitoring: As specified in the Administrator approval. Record keeping: As specified in the Administrator approval. Reporting:
Alternative Standard Petition

• The alternative standard petition the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) must include data or information documenting that raw material contributions to emissions of the regulated metals or hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas prevents the permittee from complying with the emission standard even though the source is using MACT, as defined in §63.1206(b)(10)(viii) and (ix), for the standard for which the permittee is seeking relief. (§63.1206(b)(10)(iv)(A))

• Alternate standard petitions that the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(B) must include data or information documenting that mercury is not present at detectable levels in raw materials. (§63.1206(b)(10)(iv)(B))

• The permittee must include data or information with semivolatile metal and low volatility metal alternative standard petitions that the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) documenting that increased chlorine feedrates associated with the burning of hazardous waste, when compared to non-hazardous waste operations, do not significantly increase metal emissions attributable to raw materials. (§63.1206(b)(10)(v))

• The permittee must included data or information with semi-volatile metal, low volatile metal and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas alternative standard petitions that the permittee submits under §63.1206(b)(10)(i)(A) documenting that semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emissions attributable to the hazardous waste only will not exceed the emission standards in §63.1204(a) and (b). (§63.1206(b)(10)(vi)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 68 Project No. 031-0021-023



## III. Emission Unit Specific Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

EU0010 through EU0040 EU0010 - Screen (A-2101) EU0020 - Screen (A-2201) EU0030 – Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801) EU0040 – Transfer Belt (A-3802)

General Description: Screen (A-2101) Manufacturer/Model #: Simplicity Ser. #2820-11014AX-3808 EIQ Reference # (Year): RM08A (1999)

General Description: Screen (A-2201) Manufacturer/Model #: Simplicity Ser. #1820-11014AX-3808 EIQ Reference # (Year): RM08B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt from Screen (A-3801) Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel Mfg. Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM09 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (A-3802) Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel Mfg. Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0010-001 through EU0040-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any transfer point on belt conveyors or from any other affected facility any fugitive emissions which exhibit greater than ten percent (10%) opacity. (§60.672(b))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.
Test Methods and Procedures:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 69 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.675(b)(2))

• When determining compliance with the fugitive emissions standard described under §60.672(b), the duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from three (3) hours (thirty (30) six-(6) minute averages) to one (1) hour (ten (10) six (6) minute averages) only if the following conditions apply: (§60.675(b)(3))

(1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity; and (§60.675(b)(3)(i)) (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the one-(1) hour period. (§60.675(b)(3)(ii)) Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0050 EU0050 – Secondary Crusher (A-3800)

General Description: Secondary Crusher (A-3800) Manufacturer/Model #: Universal - 130/115

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 70 Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): RM10 (1999)

Permit Condition EU0050-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any crusher, at which a capture system is not used, fugitive emissions which exhibit greater than fifteen percent (15%) opacity. (§60.672(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004.
Test Methods and Procedures:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.675(b)(2))

• When determining compliance with the fugitive emissions standard described under §60.672(c), the duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from three (3) hours (thirty (30) six-(6) minute averages) to one (1) hour (ten (10) six (6) minute averages) only if the following conditions apply: (§60.675(b)(4))

(1) There are no individual readings greater than fifteen percent (15%) opacity; and (§60.675(b)(4)(i)) (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of fifteen percent (15%) for the one-(1) hour period. (§60.675(b)(4)(ii)) Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency. Record keeping:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 71 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 72 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0060 through EU0240 EU0060 – Hopper (W-4600) EU0070 – Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary EU0080 – Transfer Belt (W-4900) EU0090 – Transfer Belt (W-5000) EU0100 – Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0110 – Hopper (W-5301) EU0120 – Transfer Belt (W-5700) EU0130 – Transfer Belt (W-3800) EU0140 – Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000) EU0150 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone) EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)

EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli) EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale) EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum) EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone)

EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash) EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash) EU0230 – Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202) EU0240 – Barge Unloading to Trucks

General Description: Hopper (W-4600) Manufacturer/Model #: Jeffrey Manufacturing, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM17 (1999)

General Description: Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) - Primary Manufacturer/Model #: Jeffrey Manufacruitng, 42 x 50 Single Direction Mud Hole EIQ Reference # (Year): RM18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-4900) Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM19 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5000) Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM19 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5000) Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): RM21 (1999)

General Description: Hopper (W-5301) Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM25(1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-5700) Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM26(1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 73 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt (W-3800) Process Enclosed (Tunnel) Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM27(1999) CD-RM27 (1999)

General Description: Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000)
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM28(1999) CD-RM28 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501; W-4502; W-4503; W-4504; W-4511; and W-4512
Dust Collector W-5800 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM29 (1999) CD-RM29 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505; and W-4506
Dust Collector W-6000 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): RM30 (1999) CD-RM30 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202)
Dust Collector R-3223 Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick Scale Mfg. Co., 451 EIQ Reference # (Year): RM31 (1999) CD-RM31 (1999)

General Description: Barge Unloading to Trucks Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): CH01 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0060-001 through EU0240-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63 lbs/hr from EU0060 through EU0090;

• 61 lbs/hr from EU0100 and EU0240;

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0110 through EU0200;

• 58.5 lbs/hr from EU0210 through EU0220;

• 25.2 lbs/hr from EU0230. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 74 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0150-002 through EU0220-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material storage any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• None Record keeping:

• None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 75 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0150-003 through EU0220-003;
EU0230-002 and EU0240-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material storage bin which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 76 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 77 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved
SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0250 through EU0340 EU0250-Hopper W-7100
EU0260 – Feeder Belt W-9800
EU0270 – Transfer Belt W-9700
EU0280 – Screen W-9701
EU0290 – Transfer Belt W-7900
EU0300 – Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106

EU0310 – Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal) EU0320 – Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal)
EU0330 – Transfer Belt C-1000
EU0340 – Transfer Belt C-2400

General Description: Hopper W-7100 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineering, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH04A (1999)

General Description: Feeder Belt W-9800 Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch System, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH04B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-9700 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 78 Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): CH05 (1999)

General Description: Screen W-9701 Manufacturer/Model #: FMC Corp., CS 148 EIQ Reference # (Year): CH07 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-7900 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH07 (1999)

General Description: Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08A (1999)

General Description: Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal) Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08B (1999)

General Description: Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal) Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH08B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt C-1000
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH09 (1999)

CD-CH9

General Description: Transfer Belt C-2400
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH09 (1999)

CD-CH9

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 79 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0250-001 through EU0340-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU0250 through EU0280;

• 63 lbs/hr form EU0290 through EU0320;

• 30.5 lbs/hr from EU0330;

• 19.2 lbs/hr from EU0340. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0250-002 through EU0340-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any coal processing and conveying equipment, coal storage system, or coal transfer and loading system processing coal, gases which exhibit twenty percent (20%) opacity or greater. (§60.252(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 80 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.254(b)(2))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 81 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0250-003 through EU0270-003; and EU0290-003 through EU0340-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the conveying system transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Performance Testing:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 82 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 83 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 84 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0350 through EU0360 EU0350 – RSP Mill System C-2500 EU0360 – Kiln Mill System C-1100

General Description: RSP Mill C-2500 Solid Fuel Feed Bin C-1700 (Coal) (Process Enclosed) Cyclone Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #803 RS Milltronics Limited, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10A1 (1999) CH11A (1999) CD-CH11 (1999)

General Description: Kiln Mill C-1100 Solid Fuel Feed Bin C-3300 (Coal) (Process Enclosed) Cyclone Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #663 Milltronics Limited, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10A2 (1999) CH11B (1999) CD-CH11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0350-001 and EU0360-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 30.5 lbs/hr from EU0350 and EU0360. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 85 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0350-002 through EU0360-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operators shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any thermal dryer gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.070 g/dscm (0.031 gr/dscf). (§60.252(a)(1))

• The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any thermal dryer gases which exhibit twenty percent (20%) opacity or greater. (§60.252(a)(2))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of any thermal dryer shall install, calibrate maintain and continuously operate monitoring devices as follows: (§60.253(a))

• A monitoring device for the measurement of the temperature of the gas stream at the exit of the thermal dryer on a continuous basis. The monitoring device is to be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate within ±3° Fahrenheit. (§60.253(a)(1))

• All monitoring devices are to be recalibrated annually in accordance with procedures under §60.13(b). (§60.253(b))

• Method 5 shall be used to determine the particulate matter concentration. The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at least sixty (60) minutes and 0.85 dscm (thirty (30) dscf). Sampling shall begin no less than 30 minutes after startup and shall terminate before shutdown procedures begin. (§60.254(b)(1))

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.254(b)(2))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 86 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous temperature recordings.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration of the continuous temperature monitoring device.

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,
2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and
3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit or particulate matter limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0350-003 and EU0360-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material dryer any gases which exhibit opacity greater than ten percent (10%). (§63.1346(a))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Performance Testing:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 87 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material dryer opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material dryer is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material dryer is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one- (1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 88 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0370 through EU0380

EU0370 – Process Heater C-1400
EU0380 – Process Heater C-2800

General Description: Process Heater C-1400 Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #7 EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10B (1999)

General Description: Process Heater C-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #D-8 EIQ Reference # (Year): CH10B (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0370-001 and EU0380-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds
Emission Limitation:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 89 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more than 0.5% weight sulfur. Monitoring:

None Record keeping:

None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

EU0390 through EU0490 EU0390 – Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0400 – Tuck Loading EU0410 – Hopper Loading KB-7000

EU0420 – Transfer Belt KB-7200
EU0430 – Transfer Belt KB-7400
EU0440 – Elevator KB-7500
EU0450 – Transfer Belt KB-7600
EU0460 – Transfer Belt KB-7700
EU0470 – Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801
EU0480 – Transfer Belt R-3803
EU0490 – Transfer Belt R-3700

General Description: Barge Unloading to Trucks Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): TH01 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): TH01 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Loading KB-7000 Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7200 Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04B (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7400

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 90 Project No. 031-0021-023

Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04B (1999)

General Description: Elevator KB-7500 Manufacturer/Model #: American Iron-Steel MFg. Co., Modified Rexnard #1612-01 EIQ Reference # (Year): TH04C (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7600
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): TH05 (1999) CD-TH5 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-7700
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): TH05 (1999) CD-TH5 (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01 (1999) CD-KP1 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt R-3803 Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt R-3700 Manufacturer/Model #: Southern Machinery Co., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP01A (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0390-001 through EU0490-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU0390 and EU0400;

• 8.56 lbs/hr from EU0410 through EU0460;

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0470 through EU0490. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 91 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0390-002 through EU0490-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 92 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved
SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 93 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0470-003 through EU0490-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220
Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the conveyor transfer point any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 94 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0500 through EU0510
EU0500 – Kiln KB-5100 EU0510 – Raw Mill System R-4300

General Description: Kiln KB-5100 Clinker Cooler (KC-0200) Cyclone Separator
Dust Collector R-4800 Manufacturer/Model #: A-C S/N C04553 Dust Collector (Buell-56RM-12) EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02A (1999) KP02D (1999) CD-KP2A (1999) CD-KP2 (1999)

General Description: Raw Mill System R-4300 Cyclone Separator
Dust Collector R-4800 Manufacturer/Model #: C.E. Raymond 16380R S/N 77098 Dust Collector (Buell-56RM-12) EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02C (1999) CD-KP2 (1999) CD-KP2 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0500-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes


### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 95 Project No. 031-0021-023

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 61.6 lbs/hr from EU0500 and EU0510.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the kiln is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the kiln is operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources.

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any kiln any gases which: (§60.62(a)) (1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln (0.30 lb per ton). (§60.62(a)(1)) (2) Exhibit greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity. (§60.62(a)(2))

• This emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall control emissions from the raw mill separator using a baghouse as specified in the permit application. The baghouse shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The baghouse shall be equipped with a gauge or meter, which indicates the pressure drop across the control device. These gauges or meters shall be located such that the DNR employees may easily observe them. Replacement filters for the baghouse shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e. temperature limits, acidic and alkali resistance and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across the baghouse at least once every twenty-four (24) hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special Condition #10)

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))

• Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with §60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install, calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))

• For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.



### • The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the baghouse which shall include the following (Special Condition #11): (1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and corrective actions; and (2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements, etc. Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.



### • These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 96 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the permit condition.

• Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a)) 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0510-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes


### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 61.6 lbs/hr from EU0520.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the kiln is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the kiln is operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources.

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any kiln any gases which: (§60.62(a)) (1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln (0.30 lb per ton). (§60.62(a)(1)) (2) Exhibit greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity. (§60.62(a)(2))

• If only the raw mill is operating, no owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw mill system any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity or greater. (§60.62(c))

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM from the raw mill system (EU0520) to less than 0.3 pounds per ton of feed as specified in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F , Standards of Performance for
Portland Cement Plants . (Special Condition #3)

• The permittee shall conduct performance tests to establish a baseline emission rate for PM 10 (filterable and condensable) from the raw mill system (EU0520). (Special Condition #4)

• This emission unit is not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Performance Testing:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 97 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Within sixty (60) days of achieving full production, but in no case later than one hundred eighty (180) days after permit issuance, an emission test shall be conducted to demonstrate compliance with Special Conditions No. 1 through 4 of Construction Permit Number: 1197- 012A. For Special Conditions No. 4, these tests shall determine the total PM10 emission rate (filterable and condensable) from the emission units identified in said conditions. For Special Condition No. 3, these tests shall determine the PM emission rate as described in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F. All tests required by this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the Stack Test Procedures outlined in Special Conditions No. 6 through 8. (Special Condition #5)

• Performance testing shall b conducted under the condition of maximum process/production rate, or within ten percent (10%) of this rated capacity. The process/production rate at which performance testing is conducted shall become the maximum process/production rate at which this source of emissions is permitted to operate under the authority granted by this permit. (Special Condition #8) Monitoring:

• The permittee shall control emissions from the raw mill separator using a baghouse as specified in the permit application. The baghouse shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The baghouse shall be equipped with a gauge or meter, which indicates the pressure drop across the control device. These gauges or meters shall be located such that the DNR employees may easily observe them. Replacement filters for the baghouse shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e. temperature limits, acidic and alkali resistance and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across the baghouse at least once every twenty-four (24) hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special Condition #10)

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))



### • Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with §60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install, calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))



### • For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. Attachment E, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.



### • The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the baghouse which shall include the following (Special Condition #11): Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and corrective actions; and Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements, etc. Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement



### • These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 98 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• A completed Proposed Test Plan Form must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program thirty (30) days prior to the proposed test date so that this program may arrange a pretest meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observer to be present. The Proposed Test Plan must be approved by the Director of the Missouri Air Pollution Control Program prior to conducting the required emission testing. (Special Condition #6)

• Two (2) copies of a report of the performance test results shall be submitted to the Director of the APCP within thirty (30) days of completion of any required testing. The report must include legible copies of the raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data and complete sample calculations from the required EPA Method for at least one sample run. (Special Condition #7)



### • Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a))



### • The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the permit condition. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0500-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds


### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001)
Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning coal with a sulfur content of no more than 6.6% weight sulfur.

• The sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel and waste oil burned by the permittee must no average more than 2.69% in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Special Condition #4) Monitoring:

• The permittee shall calculate the average sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel and fuel oil burned monthly and rolling twelve-(12) month period.

• The sulfur content of fuel shall be analyzed and recorded.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 99 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Monthly logs shall be kept on the average sulfur content of the waste derived liquid fuel and fuel oil burned. The logs must show the average sulfur content each month and shall also show the average sulfur content over the most recent twelve (12) month period. Attachment F, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement (Special Condition #5)

• The information contained in the required logs shall be made immediately available for inspection to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Special Condition #6)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0392-001 at the plant site and be made available to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Special Condition #9)

• The permittee shall maintain an accurate record of the sulfur content of fuel as fired for the
coal. The records should demonstrate that no coal utilized in the kilns was of a sulfur content greater than 6.6 percent by weight. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon request.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

Permit Condition EU0500-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 0691-010, 0392-001)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not burn more than twenty million (20,000,000) gallons of Waste Derived Liquid Fuel in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Construction Permit Number: 0392- 001, Special Condition #1)

• The permittee must not burn more than three million (3,000,000) gallons of non-hazardous waste oil in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Construction Permit Number: 0392- 001, Special Condition #2)

• The permittee must not feed more than 2.1 tons/hr of tires into the kiln. (Construction Permit Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #4 Modified from the June 1992 stack test)

• The permittee must demonstrate the following destruction and removal efficiencies: (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #7) (1) Lead – ninety-eight percent (98%); (2) Mercury – thirty-three percent (33%); (3) Beryllium – ninety-eight percent (98%); (4) Total Volatile Organic Compounds – ninety-nine and ninety-nine hundredths percent (99.99%). Monitoring:

• The permittee shall monitor the throughput of the waste derived liquid fuel, waste oil and

tires.

• The permittee shall demonstrate the destruction and removal efficiencies when conducting
Trial Burns.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 100 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Monthly burn logs for the most recent twenty-four (24) months shall be kept on site at all times. The logs must show the total amount in gallons of Waste Derived Liquid Fuel and of
waste oil burned each month and shall also show the amount burned in the most recent twelve (12) month period. Attachment G, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #3)

• The information contained in the required logs shall be made immediately available for inspection to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #6)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0392-001 at the plant site and be made available to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. (Construction Permit Number: 0392-001, Special Condition #9)

• Records shall be kept on-site for the number of tires burned and the amounts of alternate fuels burned in the portland cement kiln, with both the monthly and rolling twelve (12) month total shown. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Attachment G, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Construction Permit Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #5 Modified)

• The permittee shall keep a copy of construction permit number: 0691-010 on-site and made available immediately for inspection to Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon verbal request. (Construction Permit Number: 0691-010, Special Condition #6)

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 101 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-004



### 10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

### 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations
Emission Limitation: For each waste stream that contains benzene, including (but not limited to) organic waste streams that contain less than ten percent (10%) water and aqueous waste stream, even if the wastes are not discharged to an individual drain system, the permittee shall: (§61.342(c)(1))

• Remove or destroy the benzene contained in the waste using a treatment process or wastewater treatment system that complies with the standards specified in §61.348. (§61.342(c)(1)(i))

• Comply with the standards specified in §§61.343 through 61.347 for each waste management unit that receives or manages the waste stream prior to and during treatment of the waste stream in accordance with §61.342(c)(1)(i). (§61.342(c)(1)(ii))

Treatment Process The permittee shall design, install, operate and maintain a treatment process that either: (§61.348(a)(1))

• Removes benzene from the waste stream to a level less than 10 parts per million by weight (ppmw) on a flow-weighted annual average basis. (§61.348(a)(1)(i))

• Removes benzene from the waste stream by ninety-nine percent (99%) or more on a mass basis, or (§61.348(a)(1)(ii))

• Destroys benzene in the waste stream by incinerating the waste in a combustion unit that achieves a destruction efficiency of ninety-nine percent (99%) or greater for benzene. (§61.348(a)(1)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 102 Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

Treatment Processes Except as specified in §61.348(e)(3), if the treatment process unit has any openings (e.g., access doors, hatches, etc.), all such openings shall be sealed (e.g., gasketed, latched, etc.) and kept closed at all times when waste is being treated, except during inspection and maintenance. (§61.348(e))

• Each seal, access door, and all other openings shall be check by visual inspections iniitally and quarterly thereafter to ensure that no cracks or gaps occur and that openings are closed and gasketed properly. (§61.348(e)(1))

• Except as provided in §61.350, when a broken seal or gasket or other problem is identified, first efforts at repair shall be made as soon as practicable, but no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after identification. (§61.348(e)(2))

• If the cover and closed-vent system operate such that the treatment process unit is maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure, the permittee may operate the system with an opening that is not sealed and kept closed at all times if the following conditions are met: (§61.348(e)(3)) (1) The purpose of the opening is to provide dilution air to reduce the explosion hazard; (§61.348(e)(3)(i)) (2) The opening is designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by the instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above background, as determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in §61.355(h); and (§61.348(e)(3)(ii)) (3) The pressure is monitored continuously to ensure that the pressure in the treatment process unit remain below atmospheric pressure. (§61.348(e)(3)(iii)) Delays of Repair

• Delay of repair of facilities or units will be allowed if the repair is technically impossible without a complete or partial facility or unit shutdown. (§61.350(a))

• Repair of such equipment shall occur before the end of the next facility or unit shutdown. (§61.350(b))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 103 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring: Compliance with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart F will be determined by review of facility records and results from test and inspections using methods and procedures specified in §61.355. (§61.342(g)) Total Annual Benzene (TAB) The permittee shall determine the total annual benzene (TAB) quantity from facility waste by the following procedure: (§61.355(a))

• For each waste stream having a flow-weighted annual average water content greater than ten percent (10%) water, on a volume basis as total water, or is mixed with water or other wastes at any time and the resulting mixture has an annual average water content greater than ten percent (10%) as specified in §61.342(a), the permittee shall: (§61.355(a)(1)) Determine the annual waste quantity for each waste stream using the procedures specified in §61.355(b). (§61.355(a)(1)(i)) Determine the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration for each waste stream using the procedures specified in §61.355(c). (§61.355(a)(1)(ii)) Calculate the annual benzene quantity for each waste stream by multiplying the annual waste quantity of the waste stream times the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration. (§61.355(a)(1)(iii))

• Total annual benzene quantity from facility waste is calculated by adding together the annual benzene quantity for each waste stream generated during the year and the annual benzene quantity for each process unit turnaround waste annualized according to §61.355(b)(4). (§61.355(a)(2))

• The determination of annual waste quantity for wastes that are received at hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities from off-site shall be made at the point where the waste enter the hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. (§61.355(b)(3) The permittee shall determine the flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration in a manner that meets the requirements given in §61.355(c)(1) using either of the methods given in §61.355(c)(2) and §61.355(c)(3). (§61.355(c))

• The determination of flow-weighted annual average benzene concentration shall meet all of the following criteria: (§61.355(c)(1)) The determination shall be made at the point of waste generation except for the specific cases given in §61.355(c)(1)(i)(A) through (D). (§61.355(c)(1)(I)) (i) The determination for wastes that are received from offsite shall be made at the point where the waste enters the hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility. (§61.355(c)(1)(i)(C)) Volatilization of the benzene by exposure to air shall not be used in the determination to reduce the benzene concentration. (§61.355(c)(1)(ii)) Mixing or diluting the waste stream with other wastes or other material shall be used in the determination – to reduce the benzene concentration. (§61.355(c)(1)(iii)) For wastes with multiple phases, the determination shall provide the weighted-average benzene concentration based on the benzene concentration in each phase of the waste and the relative proportion of the phases. (§61.355(c)(1)(iv)) Measurement of the benzene concentration in the waste stream in accordance with the following procedures; (§61.355(c)(3))

• Collect a minimum of three (3) representative samples from each waste stream. Where feasible, samples shall be taken from an enclosed pipe prior to the waste being exposed to the atmosphere. (§61.355(c)(3)(i))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 104 Project No. 031-0021-023

• For waste in enclosed pipes, the following procedures shall be used: (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)) Samples shall be collected prior to the waste being exposed to the atmosphere in order to minimize the loss of benzene prior to sample. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(A)) A static mixer shall be installed in the process line or in a by-pass line unless the permittee demonstrates that installation of a static mixer in the line is not necessary to accurately determine the benzene concentration of the waste stream. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(B)) The sampling tap shall be located within two (2) pipe diameters of the static mixer outlet. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(C)) Prior to the initiation of sampling, sample lines and cooling coil shall be purged with at least four volumes of waste. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(D)) After purging, the ample flow shall be directed to a sample container and the tip of the sampling tube shall be kept below the surface of the waste during sampling to minimize contact with the atmosphere. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(E)) Samples shall be collected at a flow rate such that the cooling coil is able to maintain a waste temperature less than ten degrees Celsius (10°C). (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(F)) After filling, the ample container shall be capped immediately (within 5 seconds) to leave a minimum headspace in the container. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(G)) The sample containers shall immediately be cooled and maintained at a temperature below ten degrees Celsius (10°C) for transfer to the laboratory. (§61.355(c)(3)(ii)(H))

• When sampling from an enclosed pipe is not feasible, a minimum of three (3) representative samples shall be collected in a manner to minimize exposure of the sample to the atmosphere and loss of benzene prior to sampling. (§61.355(c)(3)(iii))
Test Methods:

• Each waste sample shall be analyzed using one (1) of the following test methods for determining the benzene concentration in a waste stream: (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)) Method 8010, Aromatic Volatile Organics in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(A)) Method 8021, Volatile Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Capillary Column Gas Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(B)) Method 8240, Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Organics in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(C)) Method 8260, Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Organics: Capillary Column Technique in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods,” EPA Publication No. SW-846; (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(D)) Method 602, Purgeable Aromatics, as described in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix A, Test Procedures for Analysis of Organic Pollutants, for wastewaters for which this is an approved EPA methods; or (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(E)) Method 624, Purgeables, as described in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix A, Test Procedures for Analysis of Organic Pollutants, for wastewaters for which this is an approved EPA method. (§61.355(c)(3)(iv)(F))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 105 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• Each record shall be maintained in a readily accessible location at the installation for a period not less than five years form the date the information is recorded unless otherwise specified. (§61.356(a))

• The permittee shall maintain records that identify each waste stream at the installation subject to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF and indicate whether or not the waste stream is controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with this subpart. In addition, the permittee shall maintain the following records: (§61.356(b)) For each waste stream not controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with this subpart, the records shall include all test results, measurements, calculations, and other documentation used to determine the following information for the waste stream: waste stream identification, water content, whether or not the waste stream is a process wastewater stream, annual waste quantity, range of benzene concentrations, annual average flow-weighted benzene concentration and annual benzene quantity. (§61.356(b)(1))

• The permittee using a treatment process or wastewater treatment system unit in accordance with §61.348 shall maintain the following records. The documentation shall be retained for the life of the unit. (§61.356(e)) A statement signed and dated by the permittee certifying that the unit is designed to operate at the documented performance level when the waste stream entering the unit is at the highest waste stream flow rate and benzene content expected to occur. (§61.356(e)(1)) If engineering calculation are used to determine treatment process or wastewater treatment system unit performance, then the permittee shall maintain the complete design analysis for the unit. The design analysis shall include for example the following information: Design specifications, drawings, schematics, piping and instrumentation diagrams, an other documentation necessary to demonstrate the unit performance. (§61.356(e)(2)) If performance tests are used to determine treatment process or wastewater treatment system unit performance then the permittee shall maintain all test information necessary to demonstrate the unit performance. (§61.356(e)(3)) (i) A description of the unit including the following information: type of treatment process; manufacturer name and model number; and for each waste stream entering and exiting the u nit, the waste stream type (e.g., process wastewater, sludge, slurry, etc.), and the design flow rate an benzene content. (§61.356(e)(3)(i)) (ii) Documentation describing the test protocol and the means by which sampling variability and analytical variability were accounted for in the determination of the unit performance. The description of the test protocol shall include the following information: sampling locations, sampling method, sampling frequency, and analytical procedures used for sample analysis. (§61.356(e)(3)(ii)) (iii) Records of unit operating conditions during each test run including all key process parameters. (§61.356(e)(3)(iii)) (iv) All test results. (§61.356(e)(3)(iv))

• For each treatment process operated to comply with §61.348, the permittee shall maintain documentation that includes the following information regarding the unit operation: (§61.356(i)) Dates of startup and shutdown of the unit. (§61.356(i)(1)) Periods of when the unit is not operated as designed. (§61.356(i)(2))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 106 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• Beginning on the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit annually to the Administrator a report that updates the following. If the information in the annual report required below is not changed in the following year, the permittee may submit a statement to that effect.: (§61.357(d)(2)) Periods of when the unit is not operated as designed. (§61.356(i)(2))Total annual benzene quantity form facility waste determined in accordance with §61.355(a). (§61.357(a)(1)) A table identifying each waste stream and whether or not the waste stream will be controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF. ((§61.357(a)(2)) For each waste stream identified as not being controlled for benzene emissions in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, the following information shall be added to the table: (§61.357(a)(3)) (i) Whether or not the water content of the waste stream is greater than ten percent (10%); (§61.357(a)(3)(i)) (ii) Whether or not the waste stream is a process wastewater stream, product tank drawdown, or landfill leachate; (§61.357(a)(3)(ii)) (iii) Annual waste quantity for the waste stream; (§61.357(a)(3)(iii)) (iv) Range of benzene concentrations for the waste stream; (§61.357(a)(3)(iv)) (v) Annual average flow-weighted benzene concentration for the waste stream; and (§61.357(a)(3)(v)) (vi) Annual benzene quantity for the waste stream. (§61.357(a)(3)(vi))

• Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit quarterly to the Administrator a certification that all of the required inspections have been carried out in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. (§61.357(d)(6))

Permit Condition EU0500-005 and EU0510-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter (PM)
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of a kiln, clinker cooler or raw mill system shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per MG (0.30 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln. When there is an alkali bypass associated with a kiln, the combined particulate matter emissions from the kiln and the alkali bypass are subject to this emission limit. (modified §63.1343(b)(1))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the raw mill is operating without the kiln, the raw mill is not subject to this permit
condition.

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-005 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-014 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 107 Project No. 031-0021-023

Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the kiln by conducting a performance test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(I) through (b)(1)(iv). The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the in-line kiln/raw mill by conducting separate performance tests as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv) while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is under normal operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating. (§63.1349)(b)(1))

• EPA Method 5 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine PM emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three (3) separate runs under the conditions that exist when the in-line kiln/raw mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one (1) hour, and the minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (thirty (30) dscf). The average of the three (3) runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine in-line kiln/raw mill feed rate, except for fuels, for each run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation (§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): 

## ( ) P Q C E sd s 

### =
Where: E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed

C
s = concentration of PM, kg/dscm Q sd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• When there is an alkali bypass associated with an in-line kiln/raw mill, the main exhaust and alkali bypass of the in-line kiln/raw mill shall be tested simultaneously and the combined emission rate of particulate matter from the in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass shall be computed for each run using the following equation (§63.1349(b)(1)(iv)): 

## ( ) P Q C Q C E sdb sb sdk sk c 

### +

=
Where:

E
c = the combined emission rate of PM from the in-line kiln/raw mill and bypass stack, kg/Mg of kiln feed

C sk = concentration of PM in in-line kiln/raw mill effluent, kg/dscm Q sdk = volumetric flow rate of in-line kiln/raw mill effluent, dscm/hr

C sb = concentration of PM in the alkali bypass gas, kg/dscm Q sdb = volumetric flow rate of alkali bypass gas, dscm/hr P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within ninety (90) days of initiating any significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test. (§63.1349(e))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 108 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter continuous emission monitoring system (PM CEMS) to measure the particulate matter discharged to the atmosphere. The compliance deadline for installing the PM CEMS and all requirements relating to performance of the PM CEMS and implementation of the PM CEMS requirement is deferred pending further rulemaking. (§63.1350(k))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in
Permit Condition: PW008.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 109 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-006 and EU0510-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity
Emission Limitation:

• If the raw mill and kiln are operating, no owner or operator of a kiln, clinker cooler and raw mill system shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which exhibit opacity greater than twenty percent (20%). (modified §63.1343(b)(2))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the raw mill is operating without the kiln, the owner or operator of each raw mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1347)

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-006 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-015 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE). Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v) through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited ruing the period of the Method 5 performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the use of a continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity during the three (3) Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(v)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are vented from these affected sources including alkali bypasses in accordance with §63.1350(c)(1) through (c)(3). (§63.1350(c))

• Except as provided in §63.1350(c)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor (COM) located at the outlet of the PM control device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by Subpart A, general provisions of this part, and according to PS-1 of Appendix B to 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1350(c)(1))

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the six (6) minute average opacity for any six (6) minute block period does not exceed twenty percent (20%). If the average opacity for any six (6) minute block period exceeds twenty percent (20%), this shall constitute a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(c)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 110 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e). (§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

Permit Condition EU0500-007 and EU0510-004



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Dioxins and Furans (D/F)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 111 Project No. 031-0021-023

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain D/F in excess of: (1) 0.20 ng per dscm (8.7x10-11 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen; or (2) 0.40 ng per dscm (1.7x10-10 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen, when the average of the performance test run average temperatures at the inlet to the particulate matter control device is two hundred four degrees Celsius (204°C) (four hundred degrees Fahrenheit (400°F)) or less. (§63.1343(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 must operate the in-line kiln/raw mill, such that (§63.1344(a)): (1) When the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is operating, the applicable temperature limit for the main in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust specified in §63.1344(b) and established during the performance test when the raw mill was operating is not exceeded. (§63.1344(a)(1)) (2) When the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating , the applicable temperature limit for the main in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust, specified in §63.1344(b) and established during the performance test when the raw mill was not operating, is not exceeded. (§63.1344(a)(2)) (3) If the in-line kiln/raw mill is equipped with an alkali bypass, the applicable temperature limit for the alkali bypass, specified in §63.1344(b) and established during the performance test when the raw mill was operating, is not exceeded. (§63.1344(a)(3))

• The temperature limit for in-line kiln/raw mill meeting the limits of §63.1344(a)(1) through §63.1344(a)(3) is determined in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1344(b))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique must operate the carbon injection system in accordance with §63.1344(c)(1) and §63.1344(c)(2). (§63.1344(c)) (1) The three-(3) hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate shall be equal to or greater than the activated carbon injection rate determine in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(vi). (§63.1344(c)(1)) (2) The owner or operator shall either (§63.1344(c)(2)): (i) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate, as a three-(3) hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specification. These specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with §63.7(c), or (§63.1344(c)(2)(i)) (ii) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas pressure drop, as a three-(3) hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specifications. These specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with §63.7(c). (§63.1344(c)(2)(ii))

• Except as provided in §63.1344(e), the owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques must specify and use the brand and type of activated carbon used duringthe performance test until a subsequent performance test is conducted, unless the sitespecific performance test plan contain documentation of key parameters that affect adsorption and the owner or operator establishes limits based on those parameters, and the limits on these parameters are maintained §63.1344(d).

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques may substitute, at any time, a different brand or type of activated carbon provided that the replacement hasequivalent or improved properties compared to the activated carbon specified in the sitespecific performance test plan and used in the performance test. The owner or operator must maintain documentation that the substitute activated carbon will provide the same or better level of control as the original activated carbon §63.1344(e).

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 112 Project No. 031-0021-023

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is burning hazardous waste, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition.

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-007 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-008 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE). Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the D/F emission limit by conducting a performance test using Method 23 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill shall demonstrate initial compliance by conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is under normal operating conditions and while the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill equipped with an alkali bypass shall conduct simultaneous performance tests of the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill exhaust and the alkali bypass, however the owner or operator of an in-line kiln/raw mill is not required to conduct a performance test of the alkali bypass exhaust when the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is not operating. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• Each performance test shall consist of three (3) separate runs; each run shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at least three (3) hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least two and one-half dry standard cubic meters (2.5 dscm) ( ninety dry standard cubic feet (90 dscf)). The concentration shall be determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the concentrations measure for the three (3) runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. (§63.1349(b)(3)(i))

• The temperature at the inlet to the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill PMCD, and where applicable, the temperature at the inlet to the alkali bypass PMCD, must be continuously recorded during the period of the Method 23 test, and the continuos temperature record(s) must be included in the performance test report. (§63.1349(b)(3)(ii))

• One (1)-minute average temperatures must be calculated for each minute of each run of the test. (§63.1349(b)(3)(iii))

• The run average temperature must be calculated for each run, and the average of the run average temperatures must be determined and included in the performance test report and will determine the applicable temperature limit in accordance with §63.1344(b). (§63.1349(b)(3)(iv))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(3) shall be repeated every 30 months. (§63.1349(d))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within ninety (90) days of initiating any significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test. (§63.1349(e))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 113 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an affected source subject to a limitation on D/F emissions shall monitor D/F emissions in accordance with §63.1350(f)(1) through (f)(6). (§63.1350(f))

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate a continuous monitor to record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, at the inlet to, or upstream of, the in-line kiln/raw mill and/or alkali bypass PM control devices. (§63.1350(f)(1)) (1) The recorder response range must include zero (0) and 1.5 times either of the average temperatures established according to the requirements in §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1350(f)(1)(i)) (2) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject to approval by the Administrator. (§63.1350(f)(1)(ii))

• The owner or operator shall monitor and continuously record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the in-line kiln/raw mill and alkali bypass, at the inlet to the in-line kiln/raw mill and/or alkali bypass PMCD. (§63.1350(f)(2))

• The three-(3) hour rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of one hundred eighty (180) successive one (1)-minute average temperatures. (§63.1350(f)(3))

• Periods of time when one (1)-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when calculating three-(3) hour rolling averages. When one (1)-minute averages become available, the first one (1)-minute average is added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-(3) hour rolling average. (§63.1350(f)(4))

• When the operating status of the raw mill of the in-line kiln/raw mill is changed from off to on, or form on to off the calculation of the three-(3) hour rolling average temperature must begin anew, with considering previous recordings. (§63.1350(f)(5))

• The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least once every three months. (§63.1350(f)(6))

• The owner or operator of any in-line kiln/raw mill subject to a D/F emission limit shall conduct an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each in-line kiln/raw mill at least once per year. (§63.1350(i))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 114 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in
Permit Condition: PW008.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator shall submit a written report of the results of the performance evaluation for the continuous monitoring system required by §63.8(e). The owner or operator shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of the performance test. (§63.1354(b)(6))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent (10%) or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 115 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-008



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste
Combustors – Dioxins and Furans
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gasses to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain(§63.1204(a)(1): (1) dioxins and furans in excess of 0.20 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; or (§63.1204(a)(1)(i)) (2) dioxins and furans in excess of 0.40 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen provided that the combustion gas temperature at the inlet to the initial particulate matter control device is 400°F or lower based on the average of the test run average temperature. (§63.1204(a)(1)(ii))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-007 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-008 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE). Operating Parameters:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 116 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the dioxin and furans emission standard by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(k)) (1) Gas Temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control device. (§63.1209(k)(1)) (i) If the combustor is equipped with an electrostatic precipitator, baghouse (fabric filter) or other dry emissions control device where particulate matter is suspended in contact with combustion gas, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum temperature of the gas at the inlet to the device on an hourly rolling average. The permittee must establish the hourly rolling average limit as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(k)(1)(I)) (2) Minimum combustion chamber temperature. (§63.1209(k)(2)) (i) The permittee must measure the temperature of each combustion chamber at a location that best represents, as practicable, the bulk gas temperature in the combustion zone. The permittee must document the temperature measurement location in the test plan the permittee submits under §63.1207(e) and (f); (§63.1209(k)(2)(i)) (ii) The permittee must establish a minimum hourly rolling average limit as the average of the test run averages; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii)) (3) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate. (§63.1209(k)(3)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device the permittee must establish and comply with a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run; (§63.1209(k)(3)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis; (§63.1209(k)(3)(ii)) (4) Maximum waste feedrate. (§63.1209(k)(4)) (i) The permittee must establish limits on the maximum pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable) waste feedrate for each location where waste is fed; (§63.1209(k)(4)(i)) (ii) The permittee must establish the limits as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(k)(4)(ii)) (iii) The permittee must comply with the feedrate limit(s) on a hourly rolling average basis; (§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 117 Project No. 031-0021-023

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 0023A, Sampling Method for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-pDioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans emissions from Stationary Sources, EPA Publication SW-846, as incorporated by reference in §63.1208(a), to determine compliance with the emission standard for dioxins and furans; (§63.1208(b)(1)(i))

• The permittee must sample for a minimum of three (3) hours, and the permittee must collect a minimum sample volume of two and one-half dry standard cubic meters (2.5 dscm); (§63.1208(b)(1)(ii))

• The permittee may assume that nondetects are present a zero (0) concentration. (§63.1208(b)(1)(iii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 118 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing as specified in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• The permittee shall monitor the gas temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control device on an hourly rolling average;(§63.1209(k)(1)(i))

• The permittee shall monitor the combustion chamber temperature on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(k)(3)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the waste feedrate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 119 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) Gas temperature at the inlet to a dry particulate matter control device; (§63.1209(k)(1)(i)) (2) Combustion chamber temperature; (§63.1209(k)(2)(ii)) (3) Flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(k)(3)(ii)) (4) Waste feedrate; (§63.1209(k)(4)(iii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive and confirmatory performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive and confirmatory performance test
results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 120 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive and confirmatory performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit conditions PW020 and PW021.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-009



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Mercury
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain mercury in excess of one hundred twenty (120) μg/dscm corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(2))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition
PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of eightyeight (88) μg/dscm or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(A))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 121 Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the mercury emission standard by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications: (§63.1209(l)) (1) Feedrate of Total Mercury – The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams as the average of test run averages, unless mercury feedrate limits are extrapolated from performance test feedrate levels under the following provisions: (§63.1209(l)(1)) (i) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and (c) and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the mercury feedrates and associated emission rates during the comprehensive performance test to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate limits and emission rates. (§63.1209(l)(1)(i)) (ii) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii)) (A) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at least at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some level of spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of spiked material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii)(A)) (B) Whether the extrapolate feedrates the permittee requests are warranted considering historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(l)(1)(ii)(B)) (iii) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee have interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(l)(1)(iii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for mercury. (§63.1208(b)(2))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 122 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit
condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(l)(1))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 123 Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) Total feedrate of mercury in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(l)(1))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 124 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-010



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Lead and Cadmium (Semi-Volatile Metals)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain lead and cadmium in excess of two hundred forty (240) μg/dscm, combined emissions, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(3))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition
PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of thirty-one thousand (31,000) μg/dscm or less and use of a particulate matter control device that achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(B))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance. Operating Parameters:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 125 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the semivolatile metal (cadmium and lead) and low volatile metal (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) emission standards by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(n)) (1) The permittee must establish a limit on the maximum inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average basis as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(1)) (2) Maximum Feedrate of semivolatile and low volatile metals. (§63.1209(n)(2)) (i) The permittee must establish feedrate limits for semivolatile metals (cadmium and lead) and low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium and chromium) as follows, except as provided by §63.1209(n)(2)(ii): (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)) (A) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of cadmium and lead, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of test run averages; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A)) (B) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of arsenic, beryllium and chromium, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages; and (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B)) (C) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of arsenic, beryllium, and chromium, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams as the average of the test run averages. Dual feedrate limits for both pumpable and total feedstreams are not required, however, if the permittee bases the total feedrate limit solely on the feedrate of pumpable feedstreams. (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C)) (ii) Feedrate extrapolation. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)) (A) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and (c) and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the semivolatile metal and low volatile metal feedrates and associated emission rates during the comprehensive performance test to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate limits and emission rates. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 126 Project No. 031-0021-023

(B) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)) (1) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at least at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some level of spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of spiked material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(1)) (2) Whether the extrapolated feedrates the permittee requests are warranted considering historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(2)) (C) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee has interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(C)) (3) The permittee must establish operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control device as specified by §63.1209(m)(1): (§63.1209(n)(3)) (i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (4) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(4)) (5) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate. (§63.1209(n)(5)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(n)(5)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis. (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to determine compliance with the emission standard for cadmium and lead (combined). (§63.1208(b)(3))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 127 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit
condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for semivolatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• If the alternate standard provision is utilized, the permittee shall monitor the feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 128 Project No. 031-0021-023

(3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) Inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device; (§63.1209(n)(1)) (2) Feedrate for semivolatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A)) (3) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (4) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the following: (1) The feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks on the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 129 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-011



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Arsenic, Beryllium and Chromium (Low Volatility Metals)
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain arsenic, beryllium and chromium in excess of fifty-six (56) μg/dscm, combined emissions, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen; (§63.1204(a)(4))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition
PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of fifty-four thousand (54,000) μg/dscm or less and use of a particulate matter control device that achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(C))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance. Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the low volatile metal (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) emission standards by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications: (§63.1209(n)) (1) The permittee must establish a limit on the maximum inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average basis as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(1)) (2) Maximum Feedrate of semivolatile and low volatile metals. (§63.1209(n)(2)) (i) The permittee must establish feedrate limits for semivolatile metals (cadmium and lead) and low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium and chromium) as follows, except as provided by §63.1209(n)(2)(ii): (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)) (A) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of cadmium and lead, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(A)) (B) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of arsenic, beryllium and chromium, combined, in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages; and (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B)) (C) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of arsenic, beryllium, and chromium, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams as the average of the test run averages. Dual feedrate limits for both pumpable and total feedstreams are not required, however, if the permittee base the total feedrate limit solely on the feedrate of pumpable feedstreams. (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 130 Project No. 031-0021-023

(ii) Feedrate extrapolation. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)) (A) The permittee may request as part of the performance test plan under §§63.7(b) and (c) and §§63.1207(e) and (f) to use the semivolatile metal and low volatile metal feedrates and associated emission rates during the comprehensive performance test to extrapolate to higher allowable feedrate limits and emission rates. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(A)) (B) The extrapolation methodology will be reviewed and approved, as warranted, by the Administrator. The review will consider in particular whether: (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)) (1) Performance test metal feedrates are appropriate (i.e., whether feedrates are at least at normal levels; depending on the heterogeneity of the waste, whether some level of spiking would be appropriate; and whether the physical form and species of spiked material is appropriate); and (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(1)) (2) Whether the extrapolated feedrates the permittee requests are warranted considering historical metal feedrate data. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(B)(2)) (C) The Administrator will review the performance test results in making a finding of compliance required by §§63.6(f)(3) and 63.1206(b)(3) to ensure that the permittee has interpreted emission test results properly and that the extrapolation procedure is appropriate for the source. (§63.1209(n)(2)(ii)(C)) (3) The permittee must establish operating parameter limits on the particulate matter control device as specified by §63.1209(m)(1): (§63.1209(n)(3)) (i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (4) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(n)(4)) (5) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(n)(5)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(n)(5)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis. (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Method 29, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for arsenic, beryllium and chromium. (§63.1208(b)(4))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 131 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit
condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device (e.g., electrostatic precipitator, baghouse) on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor the feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(2)(I)(C))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• If the alternate standard provision is utilized, the permittee shall monitor the feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be plus or minus one percent (± 1%) of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 132 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.
Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) Inlet temperature to the primary dry metals emissions control device; (§63.1209(n)(1)) (2) Feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(B)) (3) Feedrate for low volatile metals, combined, in all pumpable feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(2)(i)(C)) (4) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (5) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(n)(5)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the following: (1) The feedrate of total chlorine and chloride in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(n)(4))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 133 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-012



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbons
Emission Limitation:

• For kilns equipped with a by-pass duct – The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons, either (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)): (1) Carbon monoxide in the by-pass duct or mid-kiln gas sampling system in excess of one hundred (100) parts per million by volume, over an hourly rolling average (monitored continuously with a continuous emissions monitoring system), dry basis and corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen. If the permittee elects to comply with this carbon monoxide standard rather than the hydrocarbon standard under §63.1204(a)(5)(I)(B), the permittee must also document that, during the destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) test runs or their equivalent as provided by §63.1206(b)(7), hydrocarbons in the by-pass duct or mid-kiln gas sampling system do not exceed ten (10) parts per million by volume during those runs, over an hourly rolling average (monitored continuously with a continuous emissions monitoring system), dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen, and reported as propane; or (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)(A)) (2) Hydrocarbons in the by-pass duct or midkiln gas sampling system in excess of ten (10) parts per million by volume, over an hourly rolling average (monitored continuously with a continuous emissions monitoring system), dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen, and reported as propane. (§63.1204(a)(5)(i)(B))

• For kilns that feed hazardous waste at a location other than the end where products are normally discharged and where fuels are normally fired must comply with the twenty (20) parts per million by volume hydrocarbon standard in the main stack under §63.1204(a)(5)(ii)(A); (§63.1206(b)(13)(i)(A))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 134 Project No. 031-0021-023

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance. Note: The monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed does not include the CEM requirements of HC, CO and O 2

. Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use applicable test methods in EPA Publication SW-846, as incorporated by reference in §63.1208(a), as necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements of this subpart, except as otherwise specified in §63.1208(b)(2) – (b)(6). (§63.1208(b)(7)) Monitoring:

• Carbon monoxide standard using continuous emissions monitoring system and document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard during the destruction and removal efficiency performance test or its equivalent. (§63.1206(b)(6)) (1) If a DRE test performed after March 30, 1998 is acceptable as documentation of compliance with the DRE standard, the permittee may use the highest hourly rolling average hydrocarbon level achieved during those DRE test runs to document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard. An acceptable DRE test is a test that was used to support successful issuance or reissuance of an operating permit under Part 270 of this Chapter. (§63.1206(b)(6)(i)) (2) If during this acceptable DRE test, the permittee did not obtain hydrocarbon emissions data sufficient to document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard, the permittee must either: (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii)) (i) Perform, as part of the performance test, an “equivalent DRE test” to document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard. An equivalent DRE test is comprised of a minimum of three (3) runs each with a minimum duration of one (1) hour during which the permittee operates the combustor as close as reasonably possible to the operating parameter limits that the permittee established based on the initial DRE test. The permittee must use the highest hourly rolling average hydrocarbon emission level achieved during the equivalent DRE test to document compliance with the hydrocarbon standard; or (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii)(A)) (ii) Perform a DRE test as part of the performance test. (§63.1206(b)(6)(ii)(B))

• CEMS - The permittee must use either a carbon monoxide or hydrocarbon CEMS to demonstrate and monitor compliance with the carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon standard. The permittee must also use an oxygen CEMS to continuously correct the carbon monoxide or hydrocarbon levels to seven percent (7%) oxygen. (§63.1209(a)(1)(i))

• CEMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate the CEMS and COMS in compliance with the quality assurance procedures provided in the Appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen), and 8A (hydrocarbons) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• CO CEMS - Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(3)(ii), if a carbon monoxide CEMS detects a response that results in a one (1)-minute average at or above the 3,000 ppmv span level required by Performance Specification 4B in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60, the one (1)-minute average must be recorded as ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv). The one (1)-minute ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv) value must be used for calculating the hourly rolling average carbon monoxide level. (§63.1209(a)(3)(i))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 135 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Carbon monoxide CEMS that use a span value of ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv) when one (1)-minute carbon monoxide levels are equal to or exceed 3,000 ppmv are not subject to §63.1209(a)(3)(i) . Carbon monoxide CEMS that use a span value of 10,000 are subject to the same CEMS performance and equipment specifications when operating in the ranges of 3,000 ppmv to ten thousand parts per million by volume (10,000 ppmv) that are provided by Performance Specification 4B for other carbon monoxide CEMS, except: (§63.1209(a)(3)(ii)) (1) Calibration drift must be less than 300 ppmv; and (§63.1209(a)(3)(ii)(A)) (2) Calibration error must be less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv). (§63.1209(a)(3)(ii)(B))

• Hydrocarbon CEMS – Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(4)(ii), if a hydrocarbon CEMS detects a response that results in a one (1)-minute average at or above the one hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv) span level required by Performance Specification 8A in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60, the one (1)-minute average must be recorded as five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv). The one (1)-minute five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) value must be used for calculating the hourly rolling average HC level. (§63.1209(a)(4)(i))

• Hydrocarbon CEMS that use a span value of five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) when one (1)-minute hydrocarbon levels are equal to or exceed one hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv) are not subject to §63.1209(a)(4)(i). Hydrocarbon CEMS that use a span value of five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) are subject to the same CEMS performance and equipment specifications when operating in the range of one hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv) to five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) that are provided by Performance Specification 8A for other hydrocarbon CEMS, except: (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)) (1) The zero (0) and high-level calibration gas must have a hydrocarbon level of between 0 and one hundred parts per million by volume (100 ppmv), and between 250 and 450 ppmv, respectively; (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(A)) (2) The strip chart recorder, computer, or digital recorder must be capable of recording allreadings within the CEM measurement range and must have a resolution of two and onehalf parts per million by volume (2.5 ppmv); (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(B)) (3) The CEMS calibration must not differ by more than ±15 ppmv after each 24-hour period of the seven day test at both zero (0) and high levels; (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(C)) (4) The calibration error must be no greater than 25 ppmv; and (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(D)) (5) The zero (0) level, mid-level, and high-level calibration gas used to determine calibration error must have a hydrocarbon level of 0-200 ppmv, 150-200 ppmv, and 350-400 ppmv, respectively. (§63.1209(a)(4)(ii)(E))

• The permittee must comply with the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed in Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f))

• The performance specifications for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and oxygen CEMSs in Subpart B, 40 CFR Part 60 requires detectors to measure the sample concentration at least once every fifteen (15) seconds for calculating an average emission rate once every sixty (60) seconds shall be complied with instead of §63.8(c)(4)(ii); and (§63.1209(f)(2))

• Sections 63.8(c)(4)(i), (c)(5), and (c)(7)(i)(C) pertaining to COMS apply only to owners and operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns. (§63.1209(f)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 136 Project No. 031-0021-023

Calculation of Rolling Averages:

• The carbon monoxide or hydrocarbon CEMS must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am and hourly rolling average values by 1:01 am, when sixty (60) one (1)- minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average for those sources that come into compliance on the regulatory compliance date. Sources that elect to come into compliance before the regulatory compliance date must begin recording one (1)- minute and holurly rolling average values within sixty (60) seconds and sixty (60) minutes (when sixty (60) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average), respectively, from the time at which compliance begins. (§63.1209(a)(6)(i))

• The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the hourly rolling average. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous fifty-nine (59) values to calculate the hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(a)(6)(ii))

• Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue monitoring carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if the emission levels exceed the standard. (§63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(A))

• The permittee is not subject to the CEMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(a)(6)(iii)(B)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the CEMs. The permittee shall maintain records on the following concentrations in 15 second intervals to calculate an average emission rate once every sixty (60) seconds: (§63.1209(f)(2)) (1) Carbon Monoxide; (2) Hydrocarbon; (3) Oxygen

• The permittee shall maintain records of all calibration records obtained during compliance with the quality assurance procedures provide in the appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen), and 8A (hydrocarbons) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures provided in the appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 4B (carbon monoxide and oxygen), and 8A (hydrocarbons) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed in Appendix to Subpart EEE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 137 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-013



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Hydrochloric Acid and Chlorine Gas
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain hydrochloric acid and chlorine gas in excess of one hundred thirty (130) parts per million by volume, combined emissions, expressed as hydrochloric acid equivalents, dry basis, corrected to seven percent (7%) oxygen. (§63.1204(a)(6))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• To utilize this provision as specified in §63.1206(b)(10), please refer to permit condition
PW025.

• The permittee must utilize a hazardous waste chlorine feedrate corresponding to an MTEC of seven hundred twenty thousand (720,000) μg/dscm or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(D))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance. Operating Parameters:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 138 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must comply with the hydrogen chloride and chlorine gas emissions standard by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(o)) (1) The permittee must establish a twelve (12) hour rolling average limit for the total feedrate of chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all feedstreams as the average of the test run averages. (§63.1209(o)(1)) (2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(o)(2)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(o)(2)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis; (§63.1209(o)(2)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 139 Project No. 031-0021-023

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use Methods 26A, 320 or 321, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for hydrochloric acid and chlorine gas (combined). The permittee may use Methods 320 or 321 to make major source determinations under §63.9(b)(2)(v). (§63.1208(b)(5))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii)) Monitoring:

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing as specified in permit
condition PW020.

• The permittee shall monitor the total feedrate of chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all feedstreams on a twelve (12) hour rolling average; (§63.1209(o)(1))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(o)(2)(ii)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 140 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am, hourly rolling average values by 1:01 am (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average), and twelve (12)- hour rolling averages by 12:01 pm (e.g., when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12)-hour rolling average), for those sources that come into compl.iance on the regulatory compliance date. Sources that elect to come into compliance before the regulatory compliance date must begin recording one (1)-minute, hourly rolling average, and twleve (12)-hour rolling average values within sixty (60) seconds, sixty (60) minutes (when sixty (60) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial hourly rolling average), and seven hundred twenty (720) minutes (when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute values will be available for calculating the initial twelve (12)-hour hourly rolling average) respectively, from the time at which compliance begins. (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) The total feedrate of chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all feedstreams; (§63.1209(o)(1)) (2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(o)(2)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 141 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-014



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste
Combustors – Particulate Matter

Emission Limitation:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 142 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed. (§63.1204(a)(7))

• The permittee must use suitable methods to determine the kiln raw material feedrate. (§63.1204(a)(7)(i))

• Except as provided in §63.1204(a)(7)(iii), the permittee must compute the particulate matter emission rate, E from the following equation: 

## ( ) P Q C E sd s 

### × =
Where: E = emission rate of particulate matter, kg/Mg of kiln raw material feed;

C
s = concentration of particulate matter, kg/dscm; Q sd = volumetric flowrate of effluent gas, dscm/hr; P = total kiln raw material feed (dry basis), Mg/hr (§63.1204(a)(7)(ii))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests – Any particulate matter and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity standards) applicable to a hazardous waste combustor do not apply while you conduct particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(i))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests - Any permit or other emissions or operating parameter limits or conditions, including any limitation on workplace practices, that are applicable to hazardous waste combustors to ensure compliance with any particulate matter and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity standards) do not apply while the permittee conducts particulate matter CEMS correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(ii))

• For the provisions of this section to apply, the permittee must: (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)) (1) Develop a particulate matter CEMS correlation test plan that includes the following information. This test plan may be included as part of the comprehensive performance test plan required under §§63.1207(e) and (f): (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)) (i) Number of test conditions and number of runs for each test condition; (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(1)) (ii) Target particulate matter emission level for each test condition; (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(2)) (iii) How you plan to modify operations to attain the desired particulate matter emission levels; and (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(3)) (iv) Anticipate normal particulate matter emission levels; and (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(A)(4))

• The particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions will not be waived for more than ninety-six (96) hours, in the aggregate, for a correlation test, including all runs of all test conditions. (§63.1206(b)(8)(v))

• The permittee must return to operating conditions indicative of compliance with the applicable particulate matter and opacity standards as soon as possible after correlation testing is completed. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 143 Project No. 031-0021-023

Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the permittee selects the alternate emission standard provision for semivolatile metals and/or low volatile metals, the permittee must utilize a particulate matter control device that achieves particulate matter emissions of 0.15 kg/Mg dry feed or less; (§63.1206(b)(10)(viii)(B and/or C))

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-005 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-014 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE). Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must comply with the particulate matter emission standard by establishing and complying with the following operating parameter limits. The permittee must base the limits on operations during the comprehensive performance test, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications. (§63.1209(m)) (1) Control Device Operating Parameter Limits (OPLs) (§63.1209(m)(1)) (i) Baghouses – If the combustor is equipped with a baghouse, the permittee must establish a limit on minimum pressure drop and maximum pressure drop across each baghouse cell based on manufacturer’s specifications. The permittee must comply with the limit on an hourly rolling average. (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(m)(2)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device, the permittee must establish a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(m)(2)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis: (§63.1209(m)(2)(ii))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))
Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee must use Methods 5 or 5I, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60, to demonstrate compliance with the emission standard for particulate matter. (§63.1208(b)(6))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 144 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The stack sampling team must be on-site and prepared to perform correlation testing no later than twenty-four (24) hours after the permittee modifies operations to attain the desired particulate matter emissions concentrations, unless the permittee documents in the correlation test plan that a longer period of conditioning is appropriate. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vi))

• CEMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter CEMS to demonstrate and monitor compliance with the particulate matter standards. However, compliance with the requirements in their section to install, calibrate, maintain and operate the PM CEMS is not required until such time that the Agency promulgates all performance specifications and operational requirements applicable to PM CEMS. (§63.1209(a)(1)(iii))

• The permittee may petition the Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring for particulate matter, mercury, semivolatile metals, low volatile metals, and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas under §63.8(f) in lieu of compliance with the corresponding operating parameter limits under §63.1209. (§63.1209(a)(5))

• The permittee must comply with the quality assurance procedures for CEMS prescribed in Appendix to Subpart EE of Part 63 – Quality Assurance Procedures for Continuous Emissions Monitors Used for Hazardous Waste Combustors. (§63.1209(d)(2))

• Baghouses – The permittee shall monitor the pressure drop across each baghouse cell on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(m)(2))

• The permittee shall monitor the ash feedrate; (§63.1209(m)(3))

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. The permittee must begin calculating rolling averages anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when the permittee begins complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 145 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) Baghouses – The pressure drop across each baghouse cell; (§63.1209(m)(1)(ii)) (2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(m)(2)) (3) The ash feedrate; (§63.1209(m)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on a twelve (12) hour rolling average for the following:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the CEMS correlation test plan;

• The permittee shall maintain records of the calibration checks on the CMS equipment.

• If the permittee operates under different modes of operation, the permittee must establish operating parameter limits for each mode. The permittee must document in the operating record when the permittee changes a mode of operation and begins complying with the operating parameter limits for an alternative mode of operation. (§63.1209(q))

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 146 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• Submit the particulate matter CEMS correlation test plan to the Administrator for approval at least ninety (90) calendar days before the correlation test is scheduled to be conducted. (§63.1206(b)(8)(iii)(B))

• The Administrator will review and approve/disapprove the correlation test plan under the procedures for review and approval of the site-specific test plan provided by §63.7(c)(3)(i) and (iii). If the Administrator fails to approve or disapprove the correlation test plan within the time period specified by §63.7(c)(3)(i), the plan is considered approved, unless the Administrator has requested additional information. (§63.1206(b)(8)(iv))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 147 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-015



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Opacity
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee must not discharge or cause combustion gases to be emitted into the atmosphere that contain an opacity greater than twenty percent (20%). (§63.1204(a)(7))

• The emission limits provided by §63.1204(a) are presented with two (2) significant figures. Although the permittee must perform intermediate calculations using at least three (3) significant figures, you may round the resultant emission levels to two (2) significant figures to document compliance. (§63.1204(f))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests – Any particulate matter and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity standards) applicable to a hazardous waste combustor do not apply while you conduct particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(i))

• PM & Opacity – CEMS correlation tests - Any permit or other emissions or operating parameter limits or conditions, including any limitation on workplace practices, that are applicable to hazardous waste combustors to ensure compliance with any particulate matter and opacity standards of Parts 60, 61, 63, 264, 265 and 266 of this Chapter (i.e., any title 40 particulate or opacity standards) do not apply while the permittee conducts particulate matter CEMS correlation tests under the conditions of §63.1206(b)(8)(iii) through (vii). (§63.1206(b)(8)(ii))

• The particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions will not be waived for more than ninety-six (96) hours, in the aggregate, for a correlation test, including all runs of all test conditions. (§63.1206(b)(8)(v))

• The permittee must return to operating conditions indicative of compliance with the applicable particulate matter and opacity standards as soon as possible after correlation testing is completed. (§63.1206(b)(8)(vii))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste, the permittee may comply with EU0500-006 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL) or EU0500-015 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE).
Test Methods:

• The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• If the permittee determines compliance with the opacity standard under the monitoring requirements of §63.1209(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(1)(v), the permittee must use Method 9, provided in Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1208(b)(9))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 148 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• COMS – For cement kilns, except as provided by §63.1209(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(1)(v), the permittee must use a COMS to demonstrate and monitor compliance with the opacity standard under §§63.1204(a)(7) and (b)(7) at each point where emissions are vented form these affected sources including the bypass stack of a preheater or preheater/precalciner kiln with dual stacks. (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii)) (1) The permittee must maintain and operate each COMS in accordance with the requirements of §63.8(c) except for the requirements under §63.8(c)(3). The requirements of §63.1211(d) shall be complied with instead of §63.8(c)(3); and (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii)(A)) (2) Compliance is based on six (6)-minute block average. (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii)(B))

• COMS - The permittee must install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate the CEMS and COMS in compliance with the quality assurance procedures provided in the appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• Conduct of monitoring – The provisions of §63.8(b) apply. (§63.1209(e))

• Operation and Maintenance of Continuous Monitoring Systems – The provisions of §63.8(c) apply except: (§63.1209(f)) (1) Sections 63.8(c)(4)(i), (c)(5) and (c)(7)(i)(C) pertaining to COMS apply only to owners and operators of hazardous waste burning cement kilns. (§63.1209(f)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the COMs; (§63.1209(a)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall maintain records of all calibration records obtained during compliance with the quality assurance procedures provide in the appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the quality assurance procedures provided in the appendix to this subpart and Performance Specifications 1 (opacity) in Appendix B, 40 CFR Part 60. (§63.1209(a)(2))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 149 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0500-016



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors – Destruction and Removal Efficiency (DRE) – Principal Organic Hazardous
Constituent
Emission Limitation:

• Except as provided in §63.1204(c)(2), the permittee must achieve a destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) of 99.99% for each principle organic hazardous constituent (POHC) designated under §63.1204(c)(3). The permittee must calculate DRE for each POHC from the following equation: 

## ( ) 

## [ ] % 100 1 ×

− = in out 

### W W DRE

Where:

W in = mass feedrate of one (1) POHC in a waste feedstream; and

W out = mass emission rate of the same POHC present in exhaust emissions prior to release to the atmosphere. (63.1204(c)(1))

• If the permittee burns the dioxin-listed hazardous wastes FO20, FO21, FO22, FO23, FO26 or FO27 (see §261.31 of this Chapter), the permittee must achieve a DRE of 99.9999% for each POHC that the permittee designates under §63.1204(c)(3). The permittee must demonstrate this DRE performance on POHCs that are more difficult to incinerate that tetro-, penta-, and hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. The permittee must use the equation in §63.1204(c)(1) to calculate DRE for each POHC. In addition, the permittee must notify the Administrator of the intent to incinerate hazardous wastes FO20, FO21, FO22, FO23, FO26 or FO27. (§63.1204(c)(2))

• The permittee must treat the POHCs in the waste feed that are specified under §63.1204(c)(3)(ii) to the extent required by §63.1204(c)(1) and §63.1204(c)(2). (§63.1204(c)(3)(i))

• The permittee must specify one (1) or more POHCs from the list of hazardous air pollutants established by 42 U.S.C. 7412(b)(1), excluding caprolactam (CAS number 105602) as provided by §63.60, for each waste to be burned. The permittee must base this specification on the degree of difficulty of incineration of the organic constituents in the waste and on their concentration or mass in the waste feed, considering the results of waste analyses or other data and information. (§63.1204(c)(3)(ii))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance. Operating Parameters:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 150 Project No. 031-0021-023

• To remain in compliance with the DRE standard, the permittee must establish operating limits during the comprehensive performance test (or during a previous DRE test under provisions of §63.1206(b)(7)) for the following parameters, unless the limits are based on manufacturer specifications and comply with those limits at all times that hazardous waste remains in the combustion chamber (i.e., the hazardous waste residence time has not transpired since the hazardous waste feed cutoff system was activated): (§63.1209(j)) (1) Minimum combustion chamber temperature: (§63.1209(j)(1)) (i) The permittee must measure the temperature of each combustion chamber at a location that best represents, as practicable, the bulk gas temperature in the combustion zone. The permittee must document the temperature measurement location in the test plan the permittee submits under §63.1207(e); (§63.1209(j)(1)(i)) (ii) The permittee must establish a minimum hourly rolling average limit as the average of the test run averages; (§63.1209(j)(1)(ii)) (2) Maximum flue gas flowrate or production rate: (§63.1209(j)(2)) (i) As an indicator of gas residence time in the control device the permittee must establish and comply with a limit on the maximum flue gas flowrate, the maximum production rate, or another parameter that the permittee documents in the site-specific test plan as an appropriate surrogate for gas residence time, as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run; (§63.1209(j)(2)(i)) (ii) The permittee must comply with this limit on an hourly rolling average basis; (§63.1209(j)(2)(ii)) (3) Maximum hazardous waste feedrate: (§63.1209(j)(3)) (i) The permittee must establish limits on the maximum pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable) hazardous waste feedrate for each location where hazardous waste is fed; (§63.1209(j)(3)(I)) (ii) The permittee must establish the limits as the average of the maximum hourly rolling averages for each run. (§63.1209(j)(3)(ii)) (iii) The permittee must comply with the feedrate limit(s) on a hourly rolling average basis; (§63.1209(j)(3)(iii))

• The permittee must specify operating parameters and limits to ensure that good operation of each hazardous waste firing system is maintained. (§63.1209(j)(4)

Test Methods: The permittee must use the following test methods to determine compliance with the emission standards: (§63.1208(b))

• The permittee may use applicable test methods in EPA Publication SW-846, as incorporated by reference in §63.1208(a), as necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements of this subpart, except as otherwise specified in §63.1208(b)(2) – (b)(6). (§63.1208(b)(7))

• The permittee may use any reliable analytical method to determine feedstream concentrations of metals, chlorine and other constituents. It is the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that the sampling and analysis procedures are unbiased, precise, and that the results are representative of the feedstream. For each feedstream, the permittee must demonstrate that: (§63.1208(b)(8)) (1) Each analyte is not present above the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean; and (§63.1208(b)(8)(i)) (2) The analysis could have detected the presence of the constituent at or below the reported level at the eighty percent (80%) upper confidence limit around the mean. (See Guidance for Data Quality Assessment – Practical Methods for Data Analysis, EPA QA/G-9, January 1998, EPA/600/R-96/084). (§63.1208(b)(8)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 151 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• Except as provided in §63.1206(b)(7)(ii) and (b)(7)(iii), The permittee: (§63.1206(b)(7)(i)) (1) Must document compliance with the DRE standard under §§63.1203 through 63.1205 only once provided that you do not modify the source after the DRE test in a manner that could affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard; and (§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A)) (2) May use DRE testing performed after March 30, 1998 for purposes of issuance or reissuance of a RCRA permit under Part 270 of this Chapter to document conformance with the DRE standard if the permittee has not modified the design or operation of the source since the DRE test in a manner that could affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard. (§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(B))

• For sources that feed hazardous waste at a location in the combustion system other than the normal flame zone, the permittee: (§63.1206(b)(7)(ii)) (1) Must demonstrate compliance with the DRE standard during each comprehensive performance test; and (§63.1206(b)(7)(ii)(A)) (2) May use DRE testing performed after March 30, 1998 for purposes of issuance or reissuance of a RCRA permit under Part 270 of this Chapter to document conformance with the DRE standard if the permittee has not modified the design or operation of the source since the DRE test in a manner that could affect the ability of the source to achieve the DRE standard. (§63.1206(b)(7)(ii)(B))

• For sources that do not use DRE testing performed prior to the compliance date to document conformance with the DRE standard, the permittee must perform DRE testing during the initial comprehensive performance test. (§63.1206(b)(7)(iii))

• The permittee shall monitor the flue gas flowrate or production rate on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(j)(2))

• The permittee shall monitor the pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable) hazardous waste feedrates on an hourly rolling average; (§63.1209(j)(3))

• The permittee shall monitor the key parameters for the hazardous waste firing system; (§63.1209(j)(4) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 152 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing record keeping requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems. The permittee shall maintain records on an hourly rolling average for the following: (1) The temperature in each combustion chamber; (§63.1209(j)(1)) (2) The flue gas flowrate or production rate; (§63.1209(j)(2)) (3) The pumpable and total (i.e., pumpable and nonpumpable) hazardous waste feedrates; (§63.1209(j)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain records on the key parameters for the hazardous waste firing system; (§63.1209(j)(4)

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

• The permittee shall maintain records on-site for the most recent sixty (60) months and shall immediately make such records available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 153 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

Permit Condition EU0500-017



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste
Combustors – Cement kilns with in-line kiln raw mills – General Performance Testing:

• The permittee must conduct performance testing when the raw mill is on-line and when the mill is off-line to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards. (§63.1204(d)(1)(i)) Operating Parameters:

• The permittee must establish separate operating parameter limits under §63.1209 for each mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(i))
Alternate Standard Provision:

• If the kiln is not burning hazardous waste and the permittee is complying with the requirements of EU0500-005, EU0500-006 and EU0500-007, the permittee is not subject to this permit condition, except for the monitoring and record keeping of the hazardous waste feed and the method of compliance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 154 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee must establish rolling averages for the operating parameter limits anew (i.e., without considering previous recordings) when you begin complying with the operating limits for the alternate mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(iii))

• The permittee may comply with the mercury, semivolatile metal, low volatile metal and hydrochloric acid/chlorine gas emission standards on a time-weighted average basis under the following procedures (§63.1204(d)(2)):

• The permittee must calculate the time-weighted average emission concentration with the following equation:



## ( ) ( )       + × +       + × =

− − −

−

− − −

−
on mill off mill on mill
on mill

on mill off mill off mill off mill total 

### T T T C T T T C C

Where:

C total = time-weighted average concentration of a regulated constituent considering both
raw mill on time and off time

C mill-off = average performance test concentration of regulated constituent with the raw
mill off-line

C mill-on = average performance test concentration of regulated constituent with the raw
mill on-line

T mill-off = time when kiln gases are not routed through the raw mill

T mill-on = time when kiln gases are routed through the raw mill (§63.1204(d)(2)(i))

• Compliance: (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)) (1) If the permittee uses the emission averaging provision, the permittee must document in the operating record compliance with the emission standards on an annual basis by using the equation provided in §63.1204(d)(2). (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(A)) (2) Compliance is based on one (1)-year block averages beginning on the day the permittee submits the initial notification of compliance. (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(B))

• The permittee must include historical raw mill operation data in the performance test plan to estimate future raw mill down-time and document in the performance test plan that estimated
emissions and estimated raw mill down-time will not result in an exceedance of an emission standard on an annual basis. (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(B))

• The permittee must document in the notification of compliance submitted under §63.1207(j)
that an emission standard will not be exceeded based on the document emissions from the performance test and predicted raw mill down-time. (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(C)) CMS Monitoring

• The permittee must use continuous monitoring systems (CMS) (e.g., thermocouples, pressure transducers, and flow meters) to document compliance with the applicable operating parameter limits under this section. (§63.1209(b)(1))

• Except as specified in §63.1209(b)(2)(i) through (ii), the permittee must install and operate continuous monitoring systems other than CEMS in conformance with §63.8(c)(3) that requires the permittee, at a minimum, to comply with the manufacturer’s written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation and calibration of the system: (§63.1209(b)(2)) (1) The calibration of a thermocouple or other temperature sensor must be verified at least once every three (3) months; and (§63.1209(b)(2)(i)) (2) The accuracy of weight measurement devices used to monitor flowrate of a feedstream (e.g., activated carbon feedrate, sorbent feedrate, nonpumpable waste) must be ± 1 percent of the weight being measured. The calibration of the device must be verified at least once every three (3) months. (§63.1209(b)(2)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 155 Project No. 031-0021-023

• CMS must sample the regulated parameter without interruption, and evaluate the detector response at least once each fifteen (15) seconds and compute and record the average values at least every sixty (60) seconds. (§63.1209(b)(3))

• The span of the non-CEMS CMS detector must not be exceeded. The permittee must interlock the span limits into the automatic waste feed cutoff system required by §63.1206(c)(3). (§63.1209(b)(4))

• Calculation of Rolling Averages: (§63.1209(b)(5)) (1) Continuous monitoring systems must begin recording one (1)-minute average values by 12:01 am on the compliance date and begin recording rolling averages when enough one (1)- minute average values are available to calculate the required rolling average (e.g., when sixty (60) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate an hourly rolling average; when seven hundred twenty (720) one (1)-minute averages are available to calculate a twelve (12) hour rolling average). (§63.1209(b)(5)(i)) (2) The permittee must ignore periods of time when one (1)-minute values are not available for calculating the rolling averages. When one (1)-minute values become available again, the first one (1)-minute value is added to the previous one (1)-minute values to calculate rolling average. (§63.1209(b)(5)(ii)) (3) Calculation of rolling averages when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)) (i) Hazardous Waste Feed is Cutoff – Except as provided by §63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B), the permittee must continue to monitor operating parameter limits with a CMS when the hazardous waste feed is cutoff if the source is operating. The permittee must not resume feeding hazardous waste if an operating parameter exceeds its limit. (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(A)) (ii) The permittee is not subject to the CMS requirements during periods of time you meet the requirements of §63.1206(b)(1)(ii) (compliance with emissions standards for non hazardous waste burning sources when you are not burning hazardous waste). (§63.1209(b)(5)(iii)(B))

• The permittee shall monitor whether the hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the permittee is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart LLL or EEE. Record keeping:

• The permittee must document in the operating record each time the installation changes from one (1) mode of operation to the alternate mode and begin complying with the operating parameter limits for the alternate mode of operation. (§63.1204(d)(1)(ii))

• If the permittee uses the emission averaging provision, the permittee must document in the operating record compliance with the emission standards on an annual basis by using the equation provided in §63.1204(d)(2). (§63.1204(d)(2)(ii)(A))

• The permittee shall maintain records of the data recorded by the continuous monitoring systems.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test plans.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the comprehensive performance test results.

• The permittee shall maintain records on the calibration checks of the CMS equipment.

• The permittee shall maintain a log indicating whether or not hazardous waste is being fed to the kiln and whether the installation is complying with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or EEE. Attachment H contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 156 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the permittee elects to document compliance with one (1) or more emission standards using this emission averaging provision, the permittee must notify the Administrator in the initial comprehensive performance test plan submitted under §63.1207(e). (§63.1204(d)(2)(iii)(A))

• The permittee shall comply with the comprehensive performance testing reporting requirements as stated in permit condition PW020.

• Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report and summary report as specified in permit condition PW013.

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, and, to the extent the permittee seeks to raise an affirmative defense to a possible exceedance, any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable once the installation submits the Notification of Compliance (§63.1210(d)) under 10 CSR 10-6.075 or September 30, 2002 whichever date comes sooner.

EU0520 and EU0530
EU0520 – Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601
RU0530 – Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602

General Description: Raw Mill Air Heater – East R-4601
2 Dust Collectors Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #15 Special Air Heater EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02B (1999)

General Description: Raw Mill Air Heater – West R-4602
2 Dust Collectors Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., #15 Special Air Heater EIQ Reference # (Year): KP02B (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0520-001 and EU0530-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds
Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per million by volume (five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv)) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more than 0.5% weight sulfur. Monitoring:

None Record keeping:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 157 Project No. 031-0021-023

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

Permit Conditions EU0520-002 and EU0530-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw mill heaters any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall record the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. (§60.63(a))



### • Each owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate in accordance with §60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system to measure the opacity of emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the kiln. A continuous opacity monitoring system shall be installed on each stack of any multiple stack device controlling emissions from any kiln. If there is a separate bypass installed, each owner or operator of a kiln shall also install, calibrate, maintain and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system on each bypass stack in addition to the main control device stack. (§60.63(b))

• For the purpose of reports under §60.65, periods of excess emissions that shall be reported are defined as all six (6) minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds that allowed by §60.62(a)(2). (§60.63(d)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of the daily production rates and kiln feed rates. Attachment E, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the continuous opacity monitoring system.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting:

• Each owner or operator required to install a continuous opacity monitoring system shall submit reports of excess emissions as defined in §60.63(d). The content of these reports must comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such reports shall be submitted semiannually. (§60.65(a))

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 158 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0540 through EU0810
EU0540 – Raw Blend Silo B-0701
EU0550 – Raw Blend Silo B-0702
EU0560 – Raw Blend Silo B-0703
EU0570 – Raw Blend Silo B-0704
EU0580 – Transfer Belt KB-1200
EU0590 – Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600
EU0600 – Air Slide KB-1808
EU0610 – Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700 EU0620 – Truck Loading KB-3821 EU0630 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3800 EU0640 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3900

EU0650 – Drag Conveyor KC-501 EU0660 – Drag Conveyor KC-502
EU0670 – Elevator KC-0601
EU0680 – Elevator KC-0602

EU0690 – Truck Loading
EU0700 – Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100 EU0710 – Clinker Storage Pile Farm EU0720 – Clinker Storage Pile Farm(Enclosed) EU0730 – Hopper Loading W-9200

EU0740 – Transfer Belt W-7900
EU0750 – Transfer Belt W-8200
EU0760 – Transfer Belt KC-1000
EU0770 – Diverter Box KC-0603

EU0780 – Clinker Bin W-6601 EU0790 – Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4) EU0800 – Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5) EU0810 – Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0701
Dust Collector B-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999) CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0702
Dust Collector B-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999) CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0703
Dust Collector B-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 159 Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999) CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Silo B-0704
Dust Collector B-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03A (1999) CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KB-1200
Dust Collector B-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP03B (1999) CD-KP3 (1999)

General Description: Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600
Dust Collector KB-2600 Manufacturer/Model #: Bernnard Beumer, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04A (1999) CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Air Slide KB-1808
Dust Collector KB-2600 Manufacturer/Model #: Milltronics Limited, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04B (1999) CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Kiln Feed Bin KB-1700
Dust Collector KB-2600 Manufacturer/Model #: Milltronics Limited, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP04C (1999) CD-KP4 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading KB-3821
Dust Collector KB-3801 Manufacturer/Model #: Ashtech Corp, M-16 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07A (1999) CD-KP07 (1999)

General Description: CKD Storage Silo KB-3800
Dust Collector KB-3801 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07B (1999) CD-KP07 (1999)

General Description: CKD Storage Silo KB-3900
Dust Collector KB-3901 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP07C (1999) CD-KP07 (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 160 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Drag Conveyor KC-501 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP10 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor KC-502 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): KP10 (1999)

General Description: Elevator KC –0601
Dust Collector KC-0800 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., #1618-05M EIQ Reference # (Year): KP11A (1999) CD-KP11 (1999)

General Description: Elevator KC-0602
Dust Collector KC-0800 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., #1618-05M EIQ Reference # (Year): KP11B (1999) CD-KP11 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP12 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100
Dust Collector Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corporation, Custom Made

ECS-135C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP13 (1999) CD-KP13A (1999)

General Description: Clinker Storage Pile Farm Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP14A (1999)

General Description: Clinker Storage Pile Farm(Enclosed)
Process Enclosed Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP14B (1999) CD-KP14 (1999)

General Description: Hopper Loading W-9200
Process Enclosed
Dust Collector W-9400 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineers, Custom Made

Amerex-PR-10-360 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15A (1999) CD-KP15 (1999) CD-KP15 (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 161 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt W-7900
Dust Collector W-9400 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

Amerex-PR-10-360 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15B (1999) CD-KP15 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt W-8200
Dust Collector W-8900 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
Flex-Kleen-84WRBS EIQ Reference # (Year): KP15C (1999) CD-KP15A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-1000
Dust Collector W-7200 Manufacturer/Model #: Custom Systems Inc., Custom Made
Flex-Kleen-84WRBS EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16A (1999) CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Diverter Box KC-0603
Dust Collector W-7200 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
Flex-Kleen-84WRBS EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16B (1999) CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Bin W-6601
Dust Collector W-7200 Manufacturer/Model #: Penta Engineering Corp, Custom Made
Flex-Kleen-84WRBS EIQ Reference # (Year): KP16C (1999) CD-KP16 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4)
Dust Collector KC-1300 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17A (1999) CD-KP17 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5)
Dust Collector KC-1300 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17B (1999) CD-KP17 (1999)

General Description: Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 162 Project No. 031-0021-023

Dust Collector KC-1300

Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-81C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP17C (1999) CD-KP17 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0540-001 through EU0570-001 EU0600-001 through EU0610-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0540 through EU0570;

• 63.0 lbs/hr form EU0600 through EU0610.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the emission units are operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 163 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0580-001 through EU0590-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes


### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Numbers: 1197-012A)
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 63.9 lbs/hr from EU0580;

• 63.0 lbs/hr form EU0590.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the emission units are operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources.

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM 10 from the transfer belt identified as EU0590 to less than 0.6 lbs/hour. (Special Condition #1)

• The permittee shall limit emissions of PM10 from the raw blend elevator identified as EU0600 to less than 0.6 lbs/hr. (Special Condition #2) Performance Testing:

• Within sixty (60) days of achieving full production, but in no case later than one hundred eighty (180) days after permit issuance, an emission test shall be conducted to demonstrate compliance with Special Conditions No. 1 through 4 of Construction Permit Number: 1197- 012A. For Special Conditions No. 1 and 2, these tests shall determine the total PM 10 emission rate (filterable and condensable) from the emission units identified in said conditions. All tests required by this permit shall be conducted in accordance with the Stack Test Procedures outlined in Special Conditions No. 6 through 8. (Special Condition #5)

• Performance testing shall be conducted under the condition of maximum process/production rate, or within ten percent (10%) of this rated capacity. The process/production rate at which performance testing is conducted shall become the maximum process/production rate at which this source of emissions is permitted to operate under the authority granted by this permit. (Special Condition #8) Monitoring:



### • As required by the Performance Test. Record keeping:



### • As required by the Performance Test Reporting:

• A completed Proposed Test Plan Form must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program thirty (30) days prior to the proposed test date so that this program may arrange a pretest meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observer to be present. The Proposed Test Plan must be approved by the Director of the Missouri Air Pollution Control Program prior to conducting the required emission testing. (Special Condition #6)

• Two (2) copies of a report of the performance test results shall be submitted to the Director of the APCP within thirty (30) days of completion of any required testing. The report must include legible copies of the raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data and complete sample calculations from the required EPA Method for at least one sample run. (Special Condition #7)



### • The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 164 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0620-001 through EU0700-001 EU0730-001 through EU0810-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 40.0 lbs/hr from EU0620;

• 12.0 lbs/hr from EU0630 and EU0640;

• 57.1 lbs/hr from EU0650 through EU0690;

• 58.51 lbs/hr from EU0700;

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0730 through EU0810. 

### Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 165 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0540-002 through EU0610-002 EU0650-002 through EU0660-002
EU0700-002 EU0710-001 through EU0720-001 EU0730-002 through EU0810-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material storage and conveyor transfer point any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,
2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 166 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved
SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU0540-003 through EU0610-003 EU0620-002 through EU0640-002 EU0650-003 through EU0660-003 EU0670-002 through EU0690-002 EU0730-003 through EU0810-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 167 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 168 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0820 through EU1030
EU0820 – Transfer Belt KC-2600
EU0830 – Transfer Belt KC–2620
EU0840 – Clinker Silo KC–2901
EU0850 – Clinker Silo KC–2902
EU0860 – Clinker Silo KC–2903
EU0870 – Transfer Belt KC–2630 EU0880 – Weigh Feeder KC–3002 EU0890 – Weigh Feeder KC–3005 EU0900 – Weigh Feeder KC–3008
EU0910 – Transfer Belt KC–3200
EU0920 – Bucket Elevator KC–3400
EU0930 – Bucket Elevator KC–2550

EU0940 – Transfer Belt KC–3600 EU0950 – Truck Loading EU0960 – Hopper TL-5000
EU0970 – Transfer Belt TL-5300
EU0980 – Transfer Belt TL-5500 EU0990 – Barge Loading EU1000 – Drag Conveyor F-8701 EU1010 – Drag Conveyor F-12701
EU1020 – Elevator F-8702
EU1030 – Elevator F-12702

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2600
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999) CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2620
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999) CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2901
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999) CD-KP18 (1999

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2902
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999) CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Clinker Silo KC-2903
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: River Consulting

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 169 Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18B (1999) CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-2630
Dust Collector KC-2800 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP18A (1999) CD-KP18 (1999)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3002 Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3005 Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Weigh Feeder KC-3008 Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Merrick American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19 (OP Application)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-3200
Dust Collector KC-3300 Manufacturer/Model #: American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19A (1999) CD-KP19 (1999)

General Description: Bucket Elevator KC-3400
Dust Collector KC-3300 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnord American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP19A (1999) CD-KP19 (1999)

General Description: Bucket Elevator KC-2550
Dust Collector KC-2560 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnord American Baghouse EIQ Reference # (Year): KP21 (1999) CD-KP21 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt KC-3600
Dust Collector KC-3450 Manufacturer/Model #: American Baghouse

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 170 Project No. 031-0021-023

EIQ Reference # (Year): KP20 (1999) CD-KP20 (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): KP 23 (1999)

General Description: Hopper TL-5000
Dust Collector TL-5100 Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made
Ecolaire-900-5 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25A (1999) CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt TL-5300
Dust Collector TL-5100 Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made
Ecolaire-900-5 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25 (1999) CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt TL-5500
Dust Collector TL-5100 Manufacturer/Model #: Frucon Engineers, Custom Made
Ecolaire-900-5 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP25 (1999) CD-KP25 (1999)

General Description: Barge Loading
Dust Collector TL-5600 Manufacturer/Model #: Eemco-Delta/Mark 11-8 EIQ Reference # (Year): KP26 (1999) CD-KP26 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor F-8701
Dust Collector FO-0110 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01A (1999) CD-FM1 (1999)

General Description: Drag Conveyor F-12701
Dust Collector FO-0110 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01B (1999) CD-RM1 (1999)

General Description: Elevator F-8702
Dust Collector FO-0110 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01C (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 171 Project No. 031-0021-023

CD-FM1 (1999)

General Description: Elevator F-12702
Dust Collector FO-0110 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., Custom Made EIQ Reference # (Year): FM01D (1999) CD-FM1 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU0820-001 through EU0940-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes


### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0496-007)
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of

• 63.0 lbs/hr from EU0820 through EU0940.

• All five (5) baghouse must be in use at all times when the clinker conveyor system is in operation, and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. Each baghouse shall be equipped with a gauge or meter which indicates the pressure drop across the baghouse. This gauge or meter shall be located such that it may be easily observed by the Department of Natural Resources’ employees. Replacement bags for the baghouses shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e., temperature limits, acidic and alkali resistance and abrasion resistance). (Special Condition #1) Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring: The permittee shall monitor the operating pressure drop across each baghouse at least once every twenty-four hours. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer’s performance warranty. (Special Condition #2) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across each baghouse at least once every twenty-four hours. Attachment I, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (Special Condition #2)

• The permittee shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for each baghouse which shall include the following:

(1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of event, probable cause and correction actions; and

(2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions, and replacements (Special Condition #3)

Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.

Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 172 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Condition EU0950-001 through EU1030-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of

• 64.8 lbs/hr from EU0950 through EU0990.

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1000 through EU1030 Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU0820-002 through EU0940-002 EU0960-002 through EU0990-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the conveyor transfer point and clinker storage any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 173 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 174 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU0820-003 through EU0940-003
EU0950-002 EU0960-003 through EU0990-003 EU1000-002 through EU1030-002


### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220
Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be discharged any gases from clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004 Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the clinker storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 175 Project No. 031-0021-023

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 176 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1040 through EU1520
EU1040 – Finish Mill F-12900
EU1050 – Finish Mill F-8900 EU1060 – Separator F-13500 EU1070 – Separator F-9500 EU1080 – Hopper for Finish Mill #4
EU1090 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #4 EU1100 – Hopper for Finish Mill #5
EU1110 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #5
EU1120 – New Cement Silo 37
EU1130 – New Cement Silo 38
EU1140 – New Cement Silo 39
EU1150 – New Cement Silo 40
EU1160 – New Cement Silo 41
EU1170 – New Cement Silo 42
EU1180 – New Cement Silo 43
EU1190 – New Cement Silo 44
EU1200 – New Cement Silo 45
EU1210 – New Cement Silo 46
EU1220 – Old Cement Silo 21
EU1230 – Old Cement Silo 22
EU1240 – Old Cement Silo 23
EU1250 – Old Cement Silo 24
EU1260 – Old Cement Silo 25
EU1270 – Old Cement Silo 26
EU1280 – Old Cement Silo 27
EU1290 – Old Cement Silo 28
EU1300 – Old Cement Silo 29
EU1310 – Old Cement Silo 30
EU1320 – Old Cement Silo 31
EU1330 – Old Cement Silo 32
EU1340 – Old Cement Silo 33
EU1350 – Old Cement Silo 34
EU1360 – Old Cement Silo 35
EU1370 – Old Cement Silo 36
EU1380 – River Cement Silo 47
EU1390 – River Cement Silo 48
EU1400 – River Cement Silo 49
EU1410 – Cement Transfer Belt D-4800
EU1420 – Cement Transfer Belt
EU1430 – Transfer Belt D-4100
EU1440 – Transfer Belt D-4200 EU1450 – Barge Loading TL-0800
EU1460 – Distribution Box D-6900
EU1470 – Elevator TL-0400
EU1480 – Air Slide EU1490 – Cement Bins (Truck) EU1500 – Truck Loading EU1510 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500 EU1520 – Truck Unloading

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 177 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Finish Mill F-12900
Dust Collector Mill Cyclone Manufacturer/Model #: A.C. S/N B-04551-B ECS-405-10 F-102-00/14 F-102-021/142-02 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM02 (1999) CD-FM2 (1999) CD-FM2A (1999)

General Description: Finish Mill F-8900
Dust Collector Mill Cyclone Manufacturer/Model #: A.C. S/N B-04551-1 ECS-405-10 F-102-00/114 F-102-02/142-02 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM02A (1999) CD-FM2 (1999) CD-FM2A (1999)

General Description: Separator F-13500
Dust Collector F-103-00
Dust Collector F-143-00 Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-675-10
ECS-0405-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03A1 (1999) CD-FM3A (1999) CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: Separator F-9500
Dust Collector F-103-00
Dust Collector F-143-00 Manufacturer/Model #: Combustion Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-675-10
ECS-0405-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03A2 (1999) CD-FM3A (1999) CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: Hopper/Air Slide for Finish Mill #4
Dust Collector F-103-00 Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-675-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03B1 (1999) CD-FM3A (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 178 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Hopper/Air Slide for Finish Mill #5
Dust Collector F-143-00 Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-405-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM03B2 (1999) CD-FM3 (1999)

General Description: New Cement Silos 37-46
Dust Collectors F-153-01 & 03 Manufacturer/Model #: Kaiser Engineering, Custom Made

ECS-81C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM04 (1999) CD-FM4 (1999) CD-FM4A (1999)

General Description: Old Cement Silos (21-36)
Dust Collector L-3200 Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made
Norblo-970-64-8A EIQ Reference # (Year): FM06 (1999) CD-FM6 (1999)

General Description: River Cement Silos (47-48)
Dust Collector D-5400 Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-19 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM09 (1999) CD-FM9 (1999)

General Description: River Cement Silos (49)
Dust Collector D-5500 Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM09A (1999) CD-FM9A (1999)

General Description: Cement Transfer Belt D-4800
Dust Collector D-4300
Dust Collector D-4303 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
ECS-81C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM05 (1999) CD-FM5 (1999) CD-FM5A (1999)

General Description: Cement Transfer Belt
Dust Collector D-4300
Dust Collector D-4303 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
ECS-81C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM05A (1999) CD-FM5 (1999) CD-FM5A (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 179 Project No. 031-0021-023

General Description: Transfer Belt D-4100
Dust Collector D-4500
Dust Collector D-4503 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-64C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM07 (1999) CD-FM7 (1999) CD-FM7A (1999)

General Description: Transfer Belt D-4200
Dust Collector D-4500
Dust Collector D-4503 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made
ECS-64C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM07A (1999) CD-FM7 (1999) CD-FM7A (1999)

General Description: Barge Loading TL-0800
Dust Collector TL-0900 Manufacturer/Model #: Fuller Co., Custom Made

ECS-108C-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM10 (1999) CD-FM10 (1999)

General Description: Distribution Box D-6900
Dust Collector TL-0600 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-108-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08A (1999) CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Elevator TL-0400
Dust Collector TL-0600 Manufacturer/Model #: Rexnard Inc., 1630-4C

ECS-108-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08B (1999) CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Air Slide
Dust Collector TL-0600 Manufacturer/Model #: Willis & Paul Corp., Custom Made

ECS-108-10 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM08C (1999) CD-FM8 (1999)

General Description: Cement Bins (Truck)
Dust Collector D-7000
Dust Collector L-0130 Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made DEC Vokes-DLM 1/3/10

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 180 Project No. 031-0021-023

Norblo-68-2

EIQ Reference # (Year): FM11 (1999) CD-FM11 (1999) CD-FM11A (1999)

General Description: Truck Loading
Dust Collector D-6101
Dust Collector L-0190 Manufacturer/Model #: Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., Custom Made DEC Vokes-DLM 1/3/10
Pulse Jet EIQ Reference # (Year): FM12 (1999) CD-FM12 (1999) CD-FM12A (1999)

General Description: Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500
Dust Collector W-8400 Manufacturer/Model #: SMH Engineering Inc., Custom Made

ECS-36C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM13 (1999) CD-FM13 (1999)

General Description: Truck Unloading
Dust Collector W-8400 Manufacturer/Model #: ECS-36C-9 EIQ Reference # (Year): FM13 (1999 EIQ)

Permit Condition EU1040-001 through EU1070 and EU1380-001 through EU1500-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1040 through EU1070;

• 66.3 lbs/hr from EU1380 through EU1400;

• 74.7 lbs/hr from EU1410 through EU1440 and EU1480;

• 77.6 lbs/hr from EU1450 through EU1470;

• 61 lbs/hr from EU1490 through EU1500.

• The permittee shall operate the cyclone at all times when the finish mill is operational.

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the finish mill, hopper/air slide, cement silos, transfer belt, barge loading distribution box, elevator, air slide, cement bins or truck loading are operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 181 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• Dust Collector operation and maintenance: (1) Check and document the fabric filter pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. (2) Check the cleaning sequence of the fabric filter monthly. (3) Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. (4) Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications. Record keeping: The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection. Attachments C and D, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Condition EU1080-001 through EU1370-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 55.4 lbs/hr from EU1080 through EU1110 and EU1220 through EU1370;

• 54.7 lbs/hr from EU1120 through EU1210;

• The permittee shall operate the dust collector at all times when the hopper/air slide or cement silos are operational. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None Record keeping:

None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

Permit Conditions EU1510-001 and EU1520-001



### 10 CSR 10-3.050

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes
Emission Limitation:

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 182 Project No. 031-0021-023

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of:

• 44.6 lbs/hr from EU1510 through EU1520. Note: The emission rates in this permit condition apply to the sources individually and not the aggregated sources. Monitoring:

None. Record keeping:

None. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-3.050.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 183 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1040-002 through EU1070-002 EU1410-002 through EU1450-002 EU1510-002 through EU1520-002



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the finish mill system any gases which exhibit ten percent (10%) opacity, or greater. (§60.62(c))

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Monitoring:

• Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity. (§60.64(b)(4))

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks afterpermit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation beobserved during this period then3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

Record keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available to either the Director upon written request or Department inspection personnel upon verbal request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by the permit condition, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity
exceedance.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 184 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Conditions EU1080-002 through EU1400-002 EU1410-003 through EU1450-003 EU1460-002 through EU1500-002 EU1510-003 through EU1520-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each storage bin and conveying system transfer point shall not cause to be discharged any gases from storage bin and conveying system transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1348)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with storage bin and conveying system transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the storage bin and conveying system transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the storage bin and conveying system transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 185 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly one (1) minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six (6) consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a six (6) minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 9 test must begin within one (1) hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 186 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1040-003 through EU1070-003



### 10 CSR 10-6.075 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity


### 10 CSR 10-3.080

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants


### 10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent (10%). (§63.1347)

• These emission units are not subject to Permit Condition PW004. Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six (6)-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be three-(3) hours (thirty (30) six (6) minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to one-(1) hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than ten percent (10%) opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three (3) readings of ten percent (10%) for the first one-(1) hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five (5) years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill or finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six (6) minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): (1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1)) (2) Within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 187 Project No. 031-0021-023

Record keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five (5) years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two (2) years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three (3) years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.070 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.075 are federally and state enforceable on June 10, 2002 unless the permittee decides to comply early with the MACT standard. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-3.080 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved
SIP as a final EPA action.

EU1530 through EU1600
EU1530 – Blend Tank
EU1540 – Blend Tank
EU1550 – Blend Tank
EU1560 – Blend Tank
EU1570 – Burn Tank
EU1580 – Burn Tank EU1590 – Holding Tank EU1600 – Mixing Tank

General Description: Blend Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF1000-06 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3A (1999) CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF4000-04 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3A (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 188 Project No. 031-0021-023

CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF5000-02 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3A (1999) CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Blend Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF2000-05 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3A (1999) CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Burn Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF5000-03 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3C (1999) CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Burn Tank Carbon Cannister – Vapor Balance System Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SF6000 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF3 (1999) CD-AF3A (1999) CD-AF3B (1999)

General Description: Mixing Tank Building Vent to Kiln Manufacturer/Model #: Shar Systems, ESH 1000 TFZ EIQ Reference # (Year): AF5 (1999) CD-AF5A (1999)

General Description: Holding Tank Building Vent to Kiln Manufacturer/Model #: Shar Systems, EBH 750/300 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF7 (1999) CD-AF7A (1999)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 189 Project No. 031-0021-023

Permit Conditions EU1530-001 through EU1580-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced after July 23, 1984
Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall equip the storage tank with a closed vent system and control device meeting the following specifications: (§60.112b(a)(3)) (1) The closed vent system shall be designed to collect all VOC vapors and gases discharged from the storage vessel and operated with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million (500 ppm) above background and visual inspections, as determined in Part 60, Subpart VV, §60.485(b). (§60.112b(a)(3)(i)) (2) The control device shall be designed and operated to reduce inlet VOC emissions by 95 percent or greater. If a flare is used as the control device, it shall meet the specifications described in the general control device requirements (§60.18) of the General Provisions. (§60.112b(a)(3)(ii)) Monitoring:

• The permittee shall continuously monitor the HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln. (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

• The permittee shall obtain a daily reading and recording of the HC concentration in ppm from
the exit of the carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln. The carbon cannister control device shall be changed prior to break through. (modified §60.115b(c)(2)) Record keeping:

• The permittee shall keep the following records. (§60.115b(c)) (1) A copy of the operating plan. (§60.115b(c)(1)) (2) A daily record of the continuously monitored HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln (modified §60.115b(c)(2)) (3) A record of the carbon cannister changes (modified §60.115b(c)(2))

• These records shall be kept for at least five (5) years and shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon verbal request or to the Director upon written request.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 190 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• The permittee is exempt from §60.8 of the General Provisions and shall meet the following requirements. (§60.113b(c))

• Submit for approval by the Administrator as an attachment to the notification required by §60.7(a)(1) or, if the facility is exempt from §60.7(a)(1), as an attachment to the notification required by §60.7(a)(2), an operating plan containing the information listed below. (§60.113b(c)(1)) (1) Documentation demonstrating that the control device will achieve the required control efficiency during maximum loading conditions. This documentation is to include a description of the gas stream which enters the control device, including flow and VOC content under varying liquid level conditions (dynamic and static) and manufacturer’s design specifications for the control device. If the control device or the closed vent capture system receives vapors, gases, or liquids other than fuels from sources that are not designated sources under this subpart, the efficiency demonstration is to include consideration of all vapors, gases, and liquids received by the closed vent capture system
and control device. If an enclosed combustion device with a minimum residence time of 0.75 seconds and a minimum temperature of 816°C is used to meet the 95 percent requirement, documentation that those conditions will exist is sufficient to meet the requirements of this paragraph. (§60.113b(c)(1)(i)) (2) A description of the parameter or parameters to be monitored to ensure that the control device will be operated in conformance with its design and an explanation of the criteria used for selection of that parameter (or parameters). (§60.113b(c)(1)(ii))

Permit Conditions EU1530-002 through EU1580-002
EU1590-001 and EU1600-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations
Emission Limitation:

• For each waste stream that contains benzene, including (but not limited to ) organic waste streams that contain less than ten percent (10%) water and aqueous waste stream, even if the wastes are not discharged to an individual drain system, the permittee shall: (§61.342(c)(1)) (1) Remove or destroy the benzene contained in the waste using a treatment process or wastewater treatment system that complies with the standards specified in §61.348. (§61.342(c)(1)(i)) (2) Comply with the standards specified in §§61.343 through 61.347 for each waste management unit that receives or manages the waste stream prior to and during treatment of the waste stream in accordance with §61.342(c)(1)(i). (§61.342(c)(1)(ii))

• The permittee shall install, operate and maintain a fixed-roof and closed-vent system that routes all organic vapors vented from the tank to a control device. (§61.343(a)(1))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 191 Project No. 031-0021-023

Operating Parameters:

• The fixed-roof shall meet the following requirements: (§61.343(a)(1)(i)) (1) The cover and all openings (e.g., access hatches, sampling ports and gauge wells) shall be designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above background, as determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in §61.355(h). (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(A)) (2) Each opening shall be maintained in a closed, sealed position (e.g., covered by a lid that is gasketed and latched) at all times that waste is in the tank except when it is necessary to use the opening for waste sampling or removal, or for equipment inspection, maintenance, or repair. (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(B)) (3) If the cover and closed-vent system operate such that the tank is maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure, then §61.343(a)(1)(i)(B) does not apply to any opening that meets all of the following conditions: (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)) (i) The purpose of the opening is to provide dilution air to reduce the explosion hazard; (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(1)) (ii) The opening is designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading of less than 500 ppmv above background, as determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in §61.355(h); and (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(2)) (iii) The pressure is monitored continuously to ensure that the pressure in the tank remains below atmospheric pressure. (§61.343(a)(1)(i)(C)(3))

• The closed-vent system and control device shall be designed and operated in accordance with the requirements of §61.349. (§61.343(a)(1)(ii))

• The closed-vent system shall: (§61.349(a)(1)) (1) Be designed to operate with no detectable emissions as indicated by an instrument reading of less than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) above background, as determined initially and thereafter at least once per year by the methods specified in §61.355(h). (§61.349(a)(1)(i)) (2) Vent systems that contain any bypass line that could divert the vent stream away from a control device used to comply with the provisions of this subpart shall install, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer’s specifications a flow indicator that provides a record of vent stream flow away from the control device at least once every fifteen (15) minutes, except as provided in §61.349(a)(1)(ii)(B). (§61.349(a)(1)(ii)) (i) The flow indicator shall be installed at the entrance to any bypass line that could divert the vent stream away from the control device to the atmosphere. (§61.349(a)(1)(ii)(A)) (ii) Where the bypass line valve is secured in the closed position with a car-seal or a lockand-key type configuration, a flow indicator is not required. (§61.349(a)(1)(ii)(B)) (3) All gauging and sampling devices shall be gas-tight except when gauging or sampling is taking place. (§61.349(a)(1)(iii)) (4) For each closed-vent system complying with §61.349(a), one (1) or more devices which vent directly to the atmosphere may be used on the closed-vent system provided each device remains in a closed, sealed position during normal operations except when the device needs to open to prevent physical damage or permanent deformation of the closed-vent system resulting from malfunction of the unit in accordance with good engineering and safety practices for handling flammable, explosive, or other hazardous materials. (§61.349(a)(1)(iv))

• The control device shall be designed and operated in accordance with the following conditions: A vapor recovery system (e.g., a carbon adsorption system or a condenser) shall recover or control the organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-five weight percent (95%) or greater, or shall recover or control the benzene emissions vented to it with an efficiency of 98 weight percent or greater. (§61.349(a)(2)) and (§61.349(a)(2)(ii))

• Each closed-vent system and control device used to comply with this subpart shall be operated at all times when waste is placed in the waste management unit vented to the control device except when maintenance or repair of the waste management unit cannot be completed without a shutdown of the control device. (§61.349(b))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 192 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall demonstrate that the carbon adsorption system recovers or controls the organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-five weight percent (95%) or greater, or recovers or controls the benzene emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-eight weight percent (98%) or greater by using one (1) of the following methods: (modified §61.349(c)) (1) Engineering calculations in accordance with requirements specified in §61.356(f); or (§61.349(c)(1)) (2) Performance tests conducted using the test methods and procedures that meet the requirements specified in §61.355. (§61.349(c)(2))

• The Administrator may request at any time the permittee demonstrate that the carbon adsorption system recovers or controls the organic emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-five weight percent (95%) or greater, or recovers or controls the benzene emissions vented to it with an efficiency of ninety-eight weight percent (98%) or greater by conducting a performance test using the test methods and procedures as required in §61.355. (§61.349(e))

• Each closed-vent system and control device shall be visually inspected initially and quarterly thereafter. The visual inspection shall include inspection of ductwork and piping and
connections to covers and control devices for evidence of visible defects such as holes in ductwork or piping and loose connections. (§61.349(f))

• Except as provided in §61.350, if visible defects are observed during an inspection, or if other problems are identified, or if detectable emissions are measured, a first effort to repair the closed-vent system and control device shall be made as soon as practicable but no later than five (5) calendar days after detection. Repair shall be completed no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the emissions are detected or the visible defect is observed. (§61.349(g)) (1) Delay of repair of facilities or units that are subject to the provisions of this subpart will be allowed if the repair is technically impossible without a complete or partial facility or unit shutdown. (§61.350(a)) (2) Repair of such equipment shall occur before the end of the next facility or unit shutdown. (§61.350(b))

• The permittee shall monitor the control device in accordance with §61.354. (§61.349(h))

• The permittee shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer’s specifications a device to continuously monitor the control device operation as specified in the following paragraphs, unless alternative monitoring procedures or requirements are approved for that facility by the Administrator. The permittee shall inspect at least once each operating day the data recorded by the monitoring equipment (e.g., temperature monitor or flow indicator) to ensure that the control device is operating properly. (§61.354(c))

• For a carbon adsorption system that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on site in the control device (e.g., a carbon cannister), either the concentration level of the organic compounds or the concentration level of benzene in the exhaust vent stream from the carbon adsorption system shall be monitored on a regular schedule, and the existing carbon shall be replaced with fresh carbon immediately when carbon breakthrough is indicated. The device shall be monitored on a daily basis or at intervals no greater than twenty percent (20%) of the design carbon replacement interval, whichever is greater. As an alternative to conducting this monitoring, an owner or operator may replace the carbon in the carbon adsorption system with fresh carbon at a regular predetermined time interval that is less than the carbon replacement interval that is determined by the maximum design flow rate and either the organic concentration or the benzene concentration in the gas stream vented to the carbon adsorption system. (§61.354(d))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 193 Project No. 031-0021-023

• Each permittee who uses a system for emission control that is maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure with openings to provide dilution air shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer’s specifications a device equipped with a continuous recorder to monitor the pressure in the unit to ensure that it is less than atmospheric pressure. (§61.354(g)) Record keeping:

• The permittee using control equipment in accordance with §§61.343 through 61.347 shall maintain engineering design documentation for all control equipment that is installed on the waste management unit. The documentation shall be retained for the life of the control equipment. If a control device is used, then the permittee shall maintain the control device records required by §61.356(f). (§61.356(d))

• The permittee using a closed-vent system and control device in accordance with §61.349 shall maintain the following records. The documentation shall be retained for the life of the control device. (§61.356(f)) (1) A statement signed and dated by the permittee certifying that the closed-vent system and control device is designed to operate at the documented performance level when the waste management unit vented to the control device is or would be operating at the highest load or capacity expected to occur. (§61.356(f)(1)) (2) If engineering calculations are used to determine control device performance in accordance with §61.349(c), then a design analysis for the control device that includes for example: (§61.356(f)(2)) (i) Specifications, drawing, schematics, and piping and instrumentation diagrams prepared by the permittee, or the control device manufacturer or vendor that describe the control device design based on acceptable engineering texts. The design analysis shall address the following vent stream characteristics and control device operating parameters: (§61.356(f)(2)(i)) (A) For a carbon adsorption system that does not regenerate the carbon bed directly on-site in the control device, such as a carbon canister, the design analysis shall consider the vent stream composition, constituent concentration, flow rate, relative humidity and temperature. The design analysis shall also establish the design exhaust vent stream organic compound concentration level or the design exhaust vent stream benzene concentration level, capacity of carbon bed, type and working capacity of activated carbon used for carbon bed and design carbon replacement interval based on the total carbon working capacity of the control device and source operating schedule. (§61.356(f)(2)(i)(G)) (3) If performance tests are used to determine control device performance in accordance with §61.349(c): (§61.356(f)(3)) (i) A description of how it is determined that the test is conducted when the waste management unit or treatment process is operating at the highest load or capacity level. This description shall include the estimated or design flow rate and organic content of each vent stream and definition of the acceptable operating ranges of key process and control parameter during the test program. (§61.356(f)(3)(i)) (ii) A description of the control device including the type of control device, control device manufacturer’s name and model number, control device dimensions, capacity and construction materials. (§61.356(f)(3)(ii))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 194 Project No. 031-0021-023

(iii) A detailed description of sampling and monitoring procedures, including sampling and monitoring locations in the system, the equipment to be used, sampling and monitoring frequency and planned analytical procedures for sample analysis. (§61.356(f)(3)(iii)) (iv) All test results. (§61.356(f)(3)(iv))

• The permittee shall maintain a record for each visual inspection required by §§61.343 through 61.347 that identifies a problem (such as a broken seal, gap or other problem) which could result in benzene emissions. The record shall include the date of the inspection, waste management unit and control equipment location where the problem is identified, a description of the problem, a description of the corrective action taken and the date the corrective action was completed. (§61.356(g))

• The permittee shall maintain a record for each test of not detectable emissions required by §§61.343 through 61.347 and §61.349. The record shall include the following information: date the test is performed, background level measured during test, and maximum concentration indicated by the instrument reading measured for each potential leak interface. If detectable emissions are measured at a leak interface, then the record shall also include the waste management unit, control equipment, and leak interface location where detectable emissions were measured, a description of the problem, a description of the corrective action taken, and the date the corrective action was completed. (§61.356(h))

• For each control device, the permittee shall maintain documentation that includes the following information regarding the control device operation: (§61.356(j)) (1) Dates of startup and shutdown of the closed-vent system and control device. (§61.356(j)(1)) (2) A description of the operating parameter (or parameters) to be monitored to ensure that the control device will be operated in conformance with these standards and the control device’s design specifications and an explanation of the criteria used for selection of the parameter (or parameters). This documentation shall be kept for the life of the control device. (§61.356(j)(2)) (3) Periods when the closed-vent system and control device are not operated as designed including all periods and the duration when: (§61.356(j)(3)) (i) Any valve car-seal or closure mechanism required under §61.349(a)(1)(ii) is broken or the by-pass line valve position has changed. (§61.356(j)(3)(i)) (ii) The flow monitoring devices required under §61.349(a)(1)(ii) indicate that vapors are not routed to the control device as required. (§61.356(j)(3)(ii)) (4) If a carbon adsorber that is not regenerated directly on site in the control device is used, then the permittee shall maintain records of dates and times when the control device is monitored, when breakthrough is measured, and shall record the date and time when the existing carbon in the control device is replaced with fresh carbon. (§61.356(j)(10))

• If a system is used for emission control that is maintained at a pressure less than atmospheric pressure with openings to provide dilution air, then the permittee shall maintain records of the monitoring device and records of all periods during which the pressure in the unit is operated at a pressure that is equal to or greater than atmospheric pressure. (§61.356(m))

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 195 Project No. 031-0021-023

Reporting:

• If the total annual benzene quantity from facility waste is equal to or greater than ten (10) Mg/yr, then the permittee shall submit to the Administrator the following reports: (§61.357(d)) (1) Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit quarterly to the Administrator a certification that all of the required inspections have been carried out in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. (§61.357(d)(6)) (2) Beginning three (3) months after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit a report quarterly to the Administrator that includes: (§61.357(d)(7)) (i) For a control device monitored in accordance with §61.354(c), each period of operation monitored during which any of the following conditions occur, as applicable to the control device: (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)) (A) Each three-(3) hour period of operation during which the average concentration of organics or the average concentration of benzene in the exhaust gases from a carbon adsorber is more than twenty percent (20%) greater than the design concentration level of organics or benzene in the exhaust gas. (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(D)) (B) Each occurrence when the carbon in a carbon adsorber system that is regenerated directly on site in the control device is not regenerated at the predetermined carbon bed regeneration time. : (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(H)) (C) Each occurrence when the carbon in a carbon adsorber system that is not regenerated directly on site in the control device is not replaced at the pre-determined interval specified in §61.354(c). (§61.357(d)(7)(iv)(I)) (ii) For a cover and closed-vent system monitored in accordance with §61.354(g), the permittee shall submit a report quarterly to the Administrator that identifies any period in which the pressure in the waste management unit is equal to or greater than atmospheric pressure. (§61.357(d)(7)(v)) (3) Beginning one (1) year after the date that the equipment necessary to comply with these standards has been certified in accordance with §61.357(d)(1), the permittee shall submit annually to the Administrator a report that summarizes all inspections required by §§61.342 through 61.354 during which detectable emissions are measured or a problem (such as a broken seal, gap or other problem) that could result in benzene emissions is identified, including information about the repairs or corrective action taken. (§61.357(d)(8))

EU1610 Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading

General Description: Filter Cleaning/Pail Loading
Vent to Kiln Manufacturer/Model #: Standley Batch Systems, SN 7724 EIQ Reference # (Year): AF8 (1999) CD-AF8 (1999)

Permit Condition EU1610-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required (Construction Permit Number: 0693-009)
Emission Limitation: The number of filters cleaned at this facility shall not exceed thirty five thousand (35,000) in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. (Special Condition #1)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 196 Project No. 031-0021-023

Monitoring: The permittee shall monitor and keep track of the number of filters cleaned each month and the consecutive twelve (12) month period. Record keeping:

• The permittee must keep monthly records detailing the number of filters cleaned that month and the previous twelve (12) month total. Records for the most recent five (5) years must be kept at the facility. Attachment J, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. (modified Special Condition #2)

• Copies of all required records and of the permit shall be kept at the plant and shall be made available immediately upon verbal request to Department of Natural Resources personnel. (Special Condition #4) Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Program Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176, no later than fifteen (15) days after the end of each month if the twelve (12) month cumulative records (condition number 2) show that the permittee exceeded the limitation of condition number 1. (modified Special Condition #3)

EU1620 through EU1630 EU1620 – Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 470 kW EU1630 – Back Up Generator – Diesel Fuel – 500 kW

General Description: Back Up Generators Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (Year): MS11 (1999)

Permit Conditions EU1620-001 and EU1630-001



### 10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than five hundred parts per million by volume (500 ppmv) of sulfur dioxide.

• Emissions from any source operation shall not contain more than thirty-five milligrams (35 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three (3) hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning #2 fuel oil with a sulfur content of no more than 0.5% weight sulfur. Monitoring:

None Record keeping:

None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than fifteen (15) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 197 Project No. 031-0021-023



## IV. Core Permit Requirements

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Conditions The permittee shall submit the following information to the director not later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of the notice of excess emissions. (a.) Name and location of installation; (b.) Name and telephone number of person responsible for the installation; (c.) The identity of the equipment causing the excess emissions; (d.) The time and duration of the period of excess emissions.; (e.) The cause of the excess emissions; (f.) The type of air contaminant involved; (g.) A best estimate of the magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in the units of the applicable emission control regulation and the operating data and calculations used in estimating the magnitude; (h.) The measures taken to mitigate the extent and duration of the excess emissions; and (i.) The measures taken to remedy the situation which caused the excess emissions and the measures taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of these

situations.

10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required The permittee shall not commence construction, modification, or major modification of any installation subject to this rule, begin operation after that construction, modification, or major modification, or begin operation of any installation which has been shut down longer than five (5) years without first obtaining a permit from the permitting authority.

10 CSR 10-6.065, Operating Permits The permittee shall file for renewal of this operating permit no sooner than eighteen months, nor later than six (6) months, prior to the expiration date of this operating permit. The permittee shall retain the most current operating permit issued to this installation on-site and shall immediately make such permit available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

10 CSR 10-6.110, Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information The permittee shall complete and submit an Emission Inventory Questionnaire (EIQ) in accordance with the requirements outlined in this rule.

10 CSR 10-6.130, Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air Pollution
Potential This rule specifies the conditions that establish an air pollution alert (yellow/red), watch or emergency and the associated procedures and emissions reduction objectives for dealing with each. The permittee shall submit an appropriate emergency plan if required by the Director.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 198 Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-6.150, Circumvention The permittee shall not cause or permit the installation or use of any device or any other means which, without resulting in reduction in the total amount of air contaminant emitted, conceals or dilutes an emission or air contaminant which
violates a rule of the Missouri Air Conservation Commission.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants (a.) The director may require any person responsible for the source of emission of air contaminants to make or have made tests to determine the quantity or nature, or both, of emission of air contaminants from the source. The director may specify testing methods to be used in accordance with good professional practice. The director may observe the testing. All tests shall be performed by qualified personnel. (b.) The director may conduct tests of emissions of air contaminants from any source. Upon request of the director, the person responsible for the source to be tested shall provide necessary ports in stacks or ducts and other safe and proper sampling and testing facilities, exclusive of instruments and sensing devices as may be necessary for proper determination of the emission of air

contaminants. (c.) The director shall be given a copy of the test results in writing and signed by the person responsible for the tests.

10 CSR 10- 3.030, Open Burning Restrictions (a.) The permittee shall not conduct, cause, permit or allow a salvage operation, the disposal of trade wastes or burning of refuse by open burning. (b.) Exception - Open burning of trade waste or vegetation may be permitted only when it can be shown that open burning is the only feasible method of disposal or an emergency exists which requires open burning. (c.) Any person intending to engage in open burning shall file a request to do so with the director. The request shall include the following: (1.) The name, address and telephone number of the person submitting the application; The type of business or activity involved; A description of the proposed equipment and operating practices, the type, quantity and composition of trade wastes and expected composition and amount of air contaminants to be released to the atmosphere where known; (2.) The schedule of burning operations; (3.) The exact location where open burning will be used to dispose of the trade
wastes; (4.) Reasons why no method other than open burning is feasible; and (5.) Evidence that the proposed open burning has been approved by the fire control authority which has jurisdiction. (d.) Upon approval of the open burning permit application by the director, the person may proceed with the operation under the terms of the open burning permit. Be aware that such approval shall not exempt Lone Star Industries, Inc. from the provisions of any other law, ordinance or regulation. (e.) The permittee shall maintain files with letters from the director approving the open burning operation and previous DNR inspection reports.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 199 Project No. 031-0021-023

10 CSR 10-3.090, Restriction of Emission of Odors No person may cause, permit or allow the emission of odorous matter in concentrations and frequencies or for durations that odor can be perceived when one (1) volume of odorous air is diluted with seven (7) volumes of odor-free air for two (2) separate trials not less than fifteen (15) minutes apart within the period of one (1)
hour. This requirement is not federally enforceable.

10 CSR 10-6.100, Alternate Emission Limits Proposals for alternate emission limitations shall be submitted on Alternate Emission Limits Permit forms provided by the department. An installation owner or operator must obtain an Alternate Emission Limits Permit in accordance with 10 CSR 10-6.100 before alternate emission limits may become effective.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 200 Project No. 031-0021-023



## V. General Permit Requirements

Permit Duration 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.B.

This permit is issued for a term of five (5) years, commencing on the date of issuance. This permit will expire at the end of this period unless renewed.

General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.C

I) Record Keeping A) All required monitoring data and support information shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report or application. B) Copies of all current operating and construction permits issued to this installation shall be kept on-site for as long as the permits are in effect. Copies of these permits shall be made immediately available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. II) Reporting A) The permittee shall submit a report of all required monitoring by: 1) October 1st for monitoring which covers the January through June time period, and 2) April 1st for monitoring which covers the July through December time period. 3) Exception: Monitoring requirements which require reporting more frequently than semi annually shall report no later than thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar quarter in
which the measurements were taken. B) Each report must identify any deviations from emission limitations, monitoring, record keeping, reporting, or any other requirements of the permit. C) All reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Operating Permit Unit, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. D) Submit supplemental reports as required or as needed. Supplemental reports are required no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation or other restriction. All reports of deviations shall identify the cause or probable cause of the deviations and any corrective actions or preventative measures taken. 1) Notice of any deviation resulting from an emergency (or upset) condition as defined in paragraph (6)(C)7 of 10 CSR 10-6.065 (Emergency Provisions) shall be submitted to the permitting authority either verbally or in writing within two (2) working days after the date on which the emission limitation is exceeded due to the emergency, if you wish to assert an affirmative defense. The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that indicate an emergency occurred and that you can identify the cause(s) of the emergency. The permitted installation must show that it was operated properly at the time and that during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or requirements in the permit. The notice must contain a description of the emergency, the steps taken to mitigate emissions, and the corrective actions taken. 2) Any deviation that poses an imminent and substantial danger to public health, safety or the environment shall be reported as soon as practicable. 3) Any other deviations identified in the permit as requiring more frequent reporting than the permittee's semiannual report shall be reported on the schedule specified in the permit. E) Every report submitted shall be certified by the responsible official, except that, if a report of a deviation must be submitted within ten (10) days after the deviation, the report may be submitted without a certification if the report is resubmitted with an appropriate certification

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 201 Project No. 031-0021-023

within ten (10) days after that, together with any corrected or supplemental information required concerning the deviation. F) The permittee may request confidential treatment of information submitted in any report of
deviation. G) These supplemental reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation, or other restriction.

Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r) 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.D.

The permittee shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 68, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements. If the permittee has more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in process, as determined by 40 CFR Section 68.115, the permittee shall submit a Risk Management Plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68 no later than the latest of the following dates: 1) June 21, 1999; 2) Three (3) years after the date on which a regulated substance is first listed under 40 CFR Section 68.130; or 3) The date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in a

process.

Severability Clause 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.F.

In the event of a successful challenge to any part of this permit, all uncontested permit conditions
shall continue to be in force.

General Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.G

1) The permittee must comply with all of the terms and conditions of this permit. Any noncompliance with a permit condition constitutes a violation and is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit revocation and re-issuance, permit modification or denial of a permit renewal application. 2) The permittee may not use as a defense in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary for the permittee to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit. 3) The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, reissued or terminated for cause. Except as provided for minor permit modifications, the filing of an application or request for a permit modification, revocation and re-issuance, or termination, or the filing of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, will not stay any permit condition. 4) This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, nor grant any exclusive privilege. 5) The permittee shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program, upon receipt of a written request and within a reasonable time, any information that the Air Pollution Control Program reasonably may require to determine whether cause exists for modifying, reopening, reissuing or revoking the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee also shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program copies of records required to be kept by the permittee. The permittee may make a claim of confidentiality for any information or records submitted pursuant to 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 202 Project No. 031-0021-023

Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.H.

No permit revision will be required for any installation changes made under any approved economic incentive, marketable permit, emissions trading, or other similar programs or processes provided for in this permit.

Reasonably Anticipated Operating Scenarios 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.I.

The installation has a couple of operating scenarios in regards to the cement kiln. 4) The installation has an in-line raw mill which allows the installation to operate the raw mill with either the kiln on or off. The permit conditions for the cement kiln and raw mill have taken these operating scenarios into consideration. The following permit conditions give the specific requirements necessary when the raw mill is operating with or without the kiln: EU0500-004, EU0500-005, EU0500-006, EU0500-007, EU0500-008, EU0500-009, EU0500- 010, EU0500-014, EU0500-017, EU0520-001, EU0520-002, EU0520-003 and EU0520-004. 5) The installation has the alternative of complying with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL or 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, when the cement kiln is not burning hazardous waste. The following permit conditions have alternate standard provisions with specific monitoring and record keeping requirements which allow the installation the alternative of selecting the method of compliance: EU0500-005, EU0500-006, EU0500-007, EU0500-008, EU0500-009, EU0500- 010, EU0500-011, EU0500-012, EU0500-013, EU0500-014, EU0500-015, EU0500-016,
EU0500-017.

Compliance Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)3.

I) Any document (including reports) required to be submitted under this permit shall contain a certification signed by the responsible official. II) Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow authorized officials of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, or their authorized agents, to perform the following (subject to the installation’s right to seek confidential treatment of information submitted to, or obtained by, the Air Pollution Control Program): A) Enter upon the premises where a permitted installation is located or an emissions-related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; B) Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; C) Inspect, at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices, any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and D) As authorized by the Missouri Air Conservation Law, Chapter 643, RSMo or the Act, sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the terms of this permit, and all applicable requirements as outlined in this permit. III) All progress reports required under an applicable schedule of compliance shall be submitted semiannually (or more frequently if specified in the applicable requirement). These progress reports shall contain the following: A) Dates for achieving the activities, milestones or compliance required in the schedule of compliance, and dates when these activities, milestones or compliance were achieved, and B) An explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met, and any preventative or corrective measures adopted.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 203 Project No. 031-0021-023

IV) The permittee shall submit an annual certification that it is in compliance with all of the federally enforceable terms and conditions contained in this permit, including emissions limitations, standards, or work practices. These certifications shall be submitted annually unless the applicable requirement specifies more frequent submission. The compliance certification shall include the following: A) The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification, B) The current compliance status, as shown by monitoring data and other information reasonably available to the installation, C) Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent, D) The method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the installation, both currently and over the reporting period, and E) Such other facts as the Air Pollution Control Program will require in order to determine the compliance status of this installation.

Permit Shield 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)6.

I) Compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with all applicable requirements as of the date that this permit is issued, provided that: A) The applicable requirements are included and specifically identified in this permit; or B) The permitting authority, in acting on the permit revision or permit application, determines in writing that other requirements, as specifically identified in the permit, are not applicable to the installation, and this permit expressly includes that determination or a concise summary of it. II) Be aware that there are exceptions to this permit protection. The permit shield does not affect the following: A) The provisions of section 303 of the Act or section 643.090, RSMo concerning emergency orders, B) Liability for any violation of an applicable requirement which occurred prior to, or was existing at, the time of permit issuance, C) The applicable requirements of the acid rain program, D) The administrator's authority to obtain information, or E) Any other permit or extra-permit provisions, terms or conditions expressly excluded from the permit shield provisions.

At the time of permit issuance, the following rules do not apply to Lone Star Industries

Citation Regulation Description 10 CSR 10-3.060 Maximum Allowable Emissions of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning Equipment Used for Indirect Heating

10 CSR 10-3.110 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Dioxide for Use of Fuel

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D New Source Performance Regulations
Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators for Which Construction Is Commenced After August 17, 1971

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart E New Source Performance Regulations
Standards of Performance for Incinerators

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 204 Project No. 031-0021-023

Citation Regulation Description

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ea New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Eb New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1994 or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is Commenced After June 19, 1996

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ec New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to May 19, 1978

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After May 18, 1978, and Prior to July 23, 1984

10 CSR 10-6.070 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WWW New Source Performance Regulations Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

10 CSR 10-6.075 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning

10 CSR 10-6.075 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

10 CSR 10-6.080 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart V Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants National Emission Standard for Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources)

10 CSR 10-6.160 Medical Waste and Solid Waste Incinerators 10 CSR 10-6.190 Sewage Sludge and Industrial Waste Incinerators 10 CSR 10-6.200 Hospital, Medical, Infectious Waste Incinerators 10 CSR 10-6.310 Restriction of Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Emergency Provisions 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7.

I) An emergency or upset as defined in 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7. shall constitute an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with technology-based emissions limitations. To establish an emergency- or upset-based defense, you must demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence, the following: A) That an emergency or upset occurred and that you can identify the source of the emergency or upset, B) That the installation was being operated properly, C) That you took all reasonable steps to minimize emissions that exceeded technology-based emissions limitations or requirements in this permit, and D) That you submitted notice of the emergency to the Air Pollution Control Program within two (2) working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to the emergency. This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and any corrective actions taken.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 205 Project No. 031-0021-023

II) Be aware that an emergency or upset shall not include noncompliance caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error.

Operational Flexibility 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)8.

An installation that has been issued a Part 70 operating permit is not required to apply for or obtain a permit revision in order to make any of the changes to the permitted installation described below if the changes are not Title I modifications, the changes do not cause emissions to exceed emissions allowable under the permit, and the changes do not result in the emission of any air contaminant not previously emitted. The permittee shall notify the Air Pollution Control Program and the Administrator at least seven (7) days in advance of these changes, except as allowed for emergency or upset conditions. Emissions allowable under the permit means a federally enforceable permit term or condition determined at issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that established an emissions limit (including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable emissions cap that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. I) Section 502(b)(10) changes. Changes that, under section 502(b)(10) of the Act, contravene an express permit term may be made without a permit revision, except for changes that would violate applicable requirements of the Act or contravene federally enforceable monitoring (including test methods), record keeping, reporting or compliance requirements of the permit. A) Before making a change under this provision, The permittee shall provide advance written notice to the Air Pollution Control Program and to the Administrator, describing the changes to be made, the date on which the change will occur, and any changes in emission and any permit terms and conditions that are affected. The permittee shall maintain a copy of the notice with the permit, and this agency shall place a copy with the permit in the public file. Written notice shall be provided to the administrator and this agency at least seven (7) days before the change is to be made. If less than seven (7) days notice is provided because of a need to respond more quickly to these unanticipated conditions, The permittee shall provide notice to the administrator and the permitting authority as soon as possible after learning of the need to make the change. B) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Off-Permit Changes 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)9.

I) Except as noted below, The permittee may make any change in its permitted operations, activities or emissions that is not addressed in, constrained by or prohibited by this permit without obtaining a permit revision. Insignificant activities listed in the application, but not otherwise addressed in or prohibited by this permit, shall not be considered to be constrained by this permit for purposes of the off-permit provisions of this section. Off-permit changes shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions: A) The change must meet all applicable requirements of the Act and may not violate any existing permit term or condition; The permittee may not change a permitted installation without a permit revision, if this change is subject to any requirements under Title IV of the Act or is a Title I modification; B) The permittee must provide written notice of the change to the permitting authority and to the administrator no later than the next annual emissions report. This notice shall not be required for changes that are insignificant activities under paragraph (6)(B)3. of this rule. This written notice shall describe each change, including the date, any change in emissions, pollutants emitted and any applicable requirement that would apply as a result of the change.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 206 Project No. 031-0021-023

C) The permittee shall keep a record describing all changes made at the installation that result in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an applicable requirement and the emissions resulting from these changes; and D) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Responsible Official 10 CSR 10-6.020(2)(R)12.

The application utilized in the preparation of this was signed by John E. Burian, Director of Operations. On April 16, 2001 the Air Pollution Control Program was notified that William Steven Leus, Jr., Plant Manager has replaced John E. Burian as the responsible official. If this person terminates employment, or is reassigned different duties such that a different person becomes the responsible person to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting affairs, the owner or operator of this air contaminant source shall notify the Director of the Air Pollution Control Program of the change. Said notification shall be in writing and shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of the change. The notification shall include the name and title of the new person assigned by the source owner or operator to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting affairs. All representations, agreement to terms and conditions and covenants made by the former responsible person that were used in the establishment of limiting permit conditions on this permit will continue to be binding on the installation until such time that a revision to this permit is obtained that would change said representations, agreements and covenants.

Statement of Basis 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(E)1.C.

This permit is accompanied by a statement setting forth the legal and factual basis for the draft permit conditions (including references to applicable statutory or regulatory provisions). This Statement of Basis, while referenced by the permit, is not an actual part of the permit.

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 207 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment A

Fugitive Emission Observations

Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions Beyond

Boundary Dat

e Tim

e

No Yes Less
than

Norm
al Norm
al Great

er

Than

Norm
al Cause Corrective
Action Initi
al

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 208 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment B

(Outdoor) Observation Log

Responsible Facility Operator:

Date:

Sky Conditions: Precipitation:

Wind Direction: Wind Speed:

Process Unit: Sketch process unit: indicate observer position relative to source and sun; indicate potential emission points and/or actual emission points.

OBSERVATIONS
Clock

Time Observation Period Duration,

min:sec Accumulated Emission Time,
min:sec Begin Observation

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 209 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment C

Baghouse Operating and Maintenance Log

Date:

____________________

Incident of Malfunction:

__________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Impact on Emissions:

_____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Duration of Event:

________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Probable Cause:

___________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Corrective Actions:

_______________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 210 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment D

Maintenance Activities Schedule and Log

Date Maintenance
Activities Repair Actions Replacements Notes

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 211 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment E

Raw Mill System Log

Date Daily Production Rate (Tons) Kiln Feed Rate (Tons)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 212 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment F

Sulfur Content of the Waste Derived Liquid Fuel or Waste Oil

Date Amount of Fuel (Gallons) Sulfur Content (%) Monthly Average
Sulfur Content (%) Rolling 12-Month Average Sulfur

Content (%)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 213 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment G

Waste Derived Liquid Fuel, Waste Oil and Tires Monthly Burn Logs

Date Amount of
Fuel Burned (Gallons or Tons) Monthly Total
of Fuel Burned (Gallons or Tons) Rolling 12-Month
Total of Fuel Burned (Gallons or Tons)

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 214 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment H

Compliance Methodology Log

Date Emission Unit Is Hazardous Waste Being Fed to the Kiln (Yes/No)? 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 215 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment I

Daily Records for Pressure Drop (PSI) Across Five Baghouses



### Date Baghouse #1 Baghouse #2 Baghouse #3 Baghouse #4 Baghouse #5

## Lone Star Industries, Inc. 216 Project No. 031-0021-023

Attachment J

Filter Cleaning Log

Date Number of Filters
Cleaned Monthly Total of Filters
Cleaned Rolling 12-Month Total
of Filters Cleaned

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 1 Project No. 031-0021-023



## STATEMENT OF BASIS

Permit Reference Documents These documents were relied upon in the preparation of the operating permit. Because they are not incorporated by reference, they are not an official part of the operating permit.

1) Part 70 Operating Permit Application, received July 15, 1996; 2) 1999 Emissions Inventory Questionnaire, received April 1, 1998; 3) U.S. EPA document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors ; Volume I, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition; Section 13.2.4 Aggregate Handling and Storage Piles Section 11.6 Portland Cement Manufacturing Section 11.12 Concrete Batching 4) Construction Permit Number: 1277-007; 5) EPA PSD Permit 02/01/1978; 6) Construction Permit Number: 0483-009A to 0483-011A; 7) Construction Permit Number: 0691-010; 8) Construction Permit Number: 0392-001; 9) Construction Permit Number: 0693-009; 10) Construction Permit Number: 0697-004; 11) Construction Permit Number: 1197-012; 12) September 24, 1990, Settlement Agreement between Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Attorney General and Lone Star Industries, Inc. 13) September 7, 1995, Opacity Limitation for “In-line” Portland Cement Plants Memorandum from John Rasnic;

Applicable Requirements Included in the Operating Permit but Not in the Application In the operating permit application, the installation indicated they were not subject to the following regulation(s). However, in the review of the application, the agency has determined that the installation is subject to the following regulation(s) for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-6.100, Alternate Emission Limits This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the allowance of requests for alternate emission limits. This citing provides the information necessary to know that an alternate emission limit must be placed in a permit before the alternate emission limit may become effective

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants

, This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the allowance of requests for emissions data results. On past forms issued by the Air Pollution Control Program, including the application for this permit, it was automatically marked as an administrative rule not required to be listed as an applicable requirement. It is no longer judged to be solely administrative and is, therefore, included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.220, Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been determined to be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been determined to be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in the operating permit.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 2 Project No. 031-0021-023

Other Air Regulations Determined Not to Apply to the Operating Permit The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has determined the following requirements to not be applicable to this installation at this time for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-3.060, Maximum Allowable Emissions of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning Equipment Used for Indirect Heating The fuel burning equipment at Lone Star are direct heating units. Therefore, 10 CSR10- 3.060 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-3.110, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Dioxide for Use of Fuel This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan and replaced by 10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds . Therefore, 10 CSR 10-3.110 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.160, Medical Waste and Solid Waste Incinerators This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.160 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.190, Sewage Sludge and Industrial Waste Incinerators This rule was removed from the Missouri State Regulations and State Implementation Plan. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.190 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.200, Hospital, Medical, Infectious Waste Incinerators Cement kilns firing hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste are not subject to this rule. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.200 is not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.310, Restriction of Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills This regulation applies to municipal solid waste landfills where household waste is placed. Presently the landfill only accepts cement kiln dust (CKD). The landfill has not accepted household waste. Therefore, 10 CSR 10-6.310 is not included in the operating permit.

Construction Permit Revisions

The following revisions were made to construction permits for this installation:

1) EPA PSD Permit 02/01/1978 The special conditions have already been complied with by the installation or are part of the NSPS, therefore this construction permit was not included in the operating permit.

2) Construction Permit Number: 0691-010 Special Conditions #1, #2 and #3 deal with performance testing criteria for the combusting of tires and “alternate fuels”. The performance test results were utilized to establish limits for the amounts of tires and alternate fuels to be burned at Lone Star. The performance testing requirements have been completed for construction permit number: 0691-010 and a feedrate limit has been established for tires from the performance test results. Therefore the performance testing conditions were not included in the operating permit.

Special Condition #4 is written as follows: “No more than four (4) tires per minute shall be processed through the portland cement kiln until stack test results can be evaluated and a new limit set by the Air Pollution Control Program. The

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 3 Project No. 031-0021-023

new limit must be obtained in writing from the Air Pollution Control Program and shall be attached to the permit upon receipt by Lone Star.” The installation conducted a stack test in June of 1992 from which a new limit on the feedrate of the tires was established. The new tire feedrate established via the stack test is 4200 lb/hr or 2.1 tons/hr.

Special Condition #5 is written as follows: “Records shall be kept on-site for a period of at least two (2) years of the number of tires burned and the amounts of alternate fuels burned in the portland cement kiln, ...” With the operating permit program, the record retention period has been extended to five (5) years, therefore changes were made in the record retention period for this construction permit

3) Construction Permit Number: 0392-001 Special Condition #8 deals with performance testing criteria. Since the installation has already completed the performance testing requirements for construction permit number: 0392-001, the conditions were not included in the operating permit.

4) Construction Permit Number: 0693-009 Special Condition #2 is written as follows: “...Records for the most recent 24-month period must be kept at the facility.” With the operating permit program, the record retention period has been extended to five (5) years, therefore changes were made in the record retention period for this construction permit.

Special Condition #3 has a ten (10) day reporting requirement. According to our enforcement section, the reporting requirement should be fifteen (15) days. Therefore, the reporting condition has been modified.

5) Construction Permit Number: 0697-004 The only special condition listed in this construction permit is the required performance testing under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO. Since the installation has already completed this testing, this construction permit was not included in the operating permit.

6) Construction Permit Number: 1197-012 The requirements from this construction permit were replaced by construction permit number: 1197-012A. Therefore, the requirements of construction permit number: 1197-012 were not included in the operating permit.

NSPS Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D, Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Stem Generators for Which Construction is Commenced After August 17, 1971 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db, Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc, Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units The Back Up Generators at Lone Star are 470kW (1.6 MMBTU/Hr) and 500kW (1.7 MMBTU/Hr) which are below the applicability levels for 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D, Db and Dc. Therefore, these requirements were not included in the operating permit.

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart E – Standards of Performance for Incinerators 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ea – Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 4 Project No. 031-0021-023

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Eb – Standards of Performance for Large Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After September 20, 1994 or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is Commenced After June 19, 1996 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ec – Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996 These regulations apply to any incinerator used in the process of burning solid, municipal, hospital, medical or infectious waste. Solid waste is defined as: “refuse, more than fifty percent (50%) of which is municipal type waste consisting of a mixture of paper, wood yard wastes, food wastes, plastics, leather, rubber and other combustibles and noncombustible materials such as glass and rock.” The material combusted at Lone Star Indusctries, Inc. does not meet the definition of solid, municipal, hospital, medical or infectious waste, therefore this regulation was not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in portland cement plants that commences construction or modification after August 17, 1971: Kiln, clinker cooler, raw mill system, finish mill system, raw mill dryer, raw material storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging and bulk loading and unloading systems.

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, §63.1356 an exemption from new source performance standards is given. Any affected source subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, is exempted from any otherwise applicable new source performance standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, except for: Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b), located at areas sources are subject to PM and opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping, under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F. Greenfield raw material dryers, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b) located at area sources are subject to opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

Since the installation is a major source according to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, the installation is exempted from the new source performance standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F when the installation begins complying with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart

LLL.

EU0760 and EU0770 – Clinker Storage Pile Farms – The installation has two (2) main areas where clinker storage piles are maintained. Clinker is only stored outside when no available space exists inside for storage. The same is true for enclosed storage piles. The installation was unable to quantify the number of storage piles because the number of piles in each category is determined by need and can vary from year to year depending on market conditions. It was therefore determined that the clinker storage piles would be identified by farms under single emission unit numbers and the installation would be required to demonstrate compliance for the varying number of piles from year to year.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Standards 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K, Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to May 19, 1978 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification commenced After May 18, 1978, and Prior to July 23, 1984

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 5 Project No. 031-0021-023

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced after July 23, 1984

The following storage tanks were installed prior to June 11, 1973 or are below the level of reporting significance (Subpart K – 40,000 Gallons, Subpart Ka – 40,000 Gallons and Subpart Kb – 10,566.91 Gallons) and therefore are not subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart K,
Ka or Kb:

Description Capacity (Gallons) Storage Tanks #2, 5 and 6 – Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage 300 Storage Tanks #3 and 4 – Oil Tanks – Quarry Garage 150 Storage Tank #7 – Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage 8,000 Storage Tank #8 – Diesel Tank – Quarry Garage 10,000 Storage Tank #9 – Gasoline Tank – Quarry Garage 560 Storage Tank #10 – Used Oil Tank – Quarry Garage 1000 Storage Tank #11 – Diesel Tank – Additive Crusher 300 Storage Tank #12 – Diesel Tank – River Unloading Dock 250 Storage Tank #13 – Diesel Tank – Spray Pond Pumps 150 Storage Tank #15 – Diesel Tank – Courtyard 560 Storage Tank #16 – Diesel Tank – Plant Emergency Generator 200 Storage Tank #17 – Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300 Storage Tank #17A – Kerosene Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300 Storage Tank #18 – Diesel Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300 Storage Tank #19 – Gasoline Tank – Plant Parking Lot 300 Storage Tank #20 – Diesel Tank – Contractor Parking Lot 550 Storage Tank #21 – Gasoline Tank – Contractor Parking Lot 300 Storage Tank #27 – Diesel Tank – Waste Fuel Area 300 Storage Tank #28 – Diesel Tank – Elec. Room – 17 500

MS10-Diesel Tank (50,000 Gallons) (Storage Tank #14) was installed in 1980 and is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, due to Diesel not meeting the definition of petroleum liquids. According to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka, petroleum liquids
is defined as: “Petroleum liquids means petroleum, condensate and any finished or intermediate products manufactured in a petroleum refinery but does not mean Nos. 2 through 6 fuel oils as specified in ASTM D396-78, gas turbine fuel oils Nos. 2-GT through 4-GT as specified in ASTM D2880-78, gas turbine fuel oils Nos. 2-GT through 4-GT as specified in ASTM D2880-78, or diesel fuel oils Nos. 2-D and 4-D as specified in ASTM
D975-78.”

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Standards 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced after July 23, 1984 §60.113b(c)(2) states as follows: Operate the closed vent system and control device and monitor the parameters of the closed vent system and control device in accordance with the operating plan submitted to the Administrator in accordanc3e with §60.113b(c)(1), unless the plan was modified by the Administrator during the review process. In this case, the modified plan applies.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 6 Project No. 031-0021-023

According to the operating permit application on EU1530 through EU1580, the parameter being monitored is the HC concentration in ppm from the exit of the carbon absorbers at the vent to the kiln. The sampling frequency is listed as continuous in the operating permit application however, the monitor does not contain a continuous print-out of the monitored values. The monitor’s valve is read and recorded daily – not continuously. Therefore, the actual parameters being monitored were including in the operating permit with a daily record keeping requirement rather than the standard wording from the New Source Performance
Standard.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y, Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants This standard is applicable to any of the following affected facilities in coal preparation plants which process more than 200 tons per day and commenced construction or modification after October 24, 1974: Thermal dryers, pneumatic coal-cleaning equipment (air tables), coal processing and conveying equipment (including breakers and crushers), coal storage systems and coal transfer and loading systems. The coal processing and conveying equipment are subject to the requirements of this standard.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in fixed or portable notmetallic mineral processing plants that commences construction or modification after August 31, 1983: each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station. According to §60.670(b), “An affected facility that is subject to the provisions of subpart F or I or that follows in the plant process any facility subject to the provisions of subparts F or I of this part is not subject to the provisions of this subpart.” The following quarry operations were installed prior to August 31, 1983 are not subject to
this standard: Quarry Operation Installation Date Hopper (A-1601) 1978 Primary Crusher (A-1700) 1978 Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-1900) 1978 Primary Crusher Transfer Belt (A-2000) 1978 Chute (A-2002) 1978 Transfer Belt From Crusher To Piles (A-2500) 1978 Transfer Belt From Crusher To Piles (A-2600) 1978 Transfer Belt to Piles #1 (A-3300) 1978 Transfer Belt to Piles #4 (A-3400) 1978

The other quarry operations installed after August 31, 1983 which are prior to any facility processes that are subject to the provisions of subparts F, are subject to the requirements of
this standard. Since the rest of installation is either subject to the provisions of subpart F or follows in the plant process a facility subject to the provision of subpart F, this requirement was not included in the operating permit for those processes.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart WWW – Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills This regulation applies to municipal solid waste landfills where household waste is placed. Presently the landfill only accepts cement kiln dust (CKD). The landfill has monitoring wells and the wells are monitored yearly as a condition of the RCRA permit. The landfill has not accepted household waste, therefore this regulation was not included in the operating permit.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 7 Project No. 031-0021-023

MACT Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T, National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning The provisions of this subpart apply to each individual batch vapor, in-line vapor, in-line cold, and batch cold solvent cleaning machine that uses any solvent containing methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride or chloroform, or any combination of these halogenated HAP solvents, in a total concentration greater than five percent (5%) by weight, as a cleaning and/or drying agent. Wipe cleaning activities, such as using a rag containing halogenated solvent are not covered under the provisions of this subpart. Lone Star Industries uses mineral spirits or a citrus based solvent in four (4) parts washers (thirty-five (35) gallons). Therefore, the installation does not use a regulated solvent and the requirements were not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations The installation is not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, due to the exemption stated in §63.683(c)(1). According to §63.683(c)(1): “An off-site material management unit is exempted from the requirements specified in §63.683(b), if the unit is also subject to another subpart under 40 CFR Part 61 or 40 CFR Part 63, and the owner or operator is controlling the HAP listed in Table 1 of this subpart that are emitted from the unit in compliance with the provisions specified in the other applicable subpart.” According to §63.680(b)(2)(vi), the following materials are not off-site materials: “Waste that is generated by or transferred from units complying with all applicable requirements specfieid by 61.342(b) under 40 CFR 61 subpart FF – National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations for a facility at which the total annual benzene quantitiy from the facility waste is equal to or greater than 10 megagrams per year.” The off-site waste is placed in hazardous waste storage tanks complying with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, therefore when the waste leaves these storage tanks or is "transferred from” these units complying with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, the waste is no longer off-site waste. According to the July 1, 1996 Preamble: “Some NESHAP already regulate air emissions from the off-site management of certain wastes containing HAP. To avoid duplication of requirements in these cases, the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP does not apply to waste management units that either receive waste from units complying with all applicable regulations under the HON, or receive waste from units complying with all applicable requirements specified by §61.342(b) under 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF – National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations for a plant a which the total annual benzene quantity is greater than or equal to ten (10) Mg/yr.” The cement kiln and the hazardous waste storage tanks are complying with 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, therefore the requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD were not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from
Hazardous Waste Combustors

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 8 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of this subpart apply to all hazardous waste combustors: hazardous waste incinerators, hazardous waste burning cement kilns and hazardous waste burning lightweight kilns, except as provided in the table below:

IF AND IF THEN

You are a previously affected

source 1) You ceased feeding hazardous waste for a period of time greater than the hazardous waste residence time (i.e., hazardous waste no longer resides in the combustion chamber), 2) You are initiated the closure requirements of subpart G, parts 264 or 265 of this Chapter, 3) You begin complying with the requirements of all other applicable standards of this part (Part 63), and 4) You notify the Administrator in writing that you are no longer an affected source under this Subpart EEE. You are no longer subject to Subpart EEE.

You are a research, development, and
demonstration

source You operate for no longer than one (1) year after first burning hazardous waste (Note that the Administrator can extent this one (1)-year restriction on a case-by-case basis upon your written request documenting when you first burned hazardous waste and the justification for needing additional time to perform research, development, or demonstration operations.) You are not subject to Subpart EEE. This exemption applies
even if there is a hazardous waste combustor at the plant site that is regulated under this subpart. You still, however, remain subject to §270.65 of this Chapter.

The only hazardous wastes you burn are exempt from regulation under §266.100(b) of this Chapter You are not subject to the requirements of Subpart EEE.

The hazardous waste burning cement kiln is subject to the requirements of this standard. Therefore, the MACT was included in the operating permit.

The MACT for hazardous waste combustors was finalized on September 30, 1999 and the EPA has promulgated two (2) revisions to the standard on November 19, 1999 and July10, 2000. This regulation is still under negotiations with industry and a technical guidance document is to be published in the near future. The regulation is likely to change as a result of negotiation and litigation and certain changes may be necessary to the operating permit.

If 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE is revised, the installation is subject to the revised standard. For operating permits with an expiration date more than three (3) years away, the permitshould be reopened to incorporate the new requirements. The mechanism for this reopening, under the current Part 70 rules, would be a “re-opening for cause”. The installation should request a “re-opening of the operating permit for cause, upon rule modifications in the federal register. The changes to the permit will be made as expeditiously as possible, but

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 9 Project No. 031-0021-023

no later than eighteen (18) months. As long as the installation is meeting the requirements of the revised rule, it is deemed to be in compliance. The Air Pollution Control Program would not view the installation as being in violation of the operating permit if the installation is complying with the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as published in the federal register.

PW020 – Lone Star is wanting to utilize data in lieu from a previous trial burn to demonstrate compliance with the limits. The trial burn was conducted prior to the date listed for the data in lieu provisions. According to Lone Star, this issue is still being negotiated with EPA. This condition has been place in the operating permit, but if EPA decides to re-open 40 CFR Part63, Subpart EEE and re-write this portion of the regulation, the operating permit will be reopened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit
conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Several of the operating parameter conditions require the installation to minimize combustion temperature, maximize production rate or flue gas flowrate and maximize waste feedrate. According to Lone Star, one cannot minimize temperature and maximize production and waste feed rate simultaneously. We understand the concerns of the installation, however the permit condition must remain as written, but if EPA decides to re-open 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and re-write this portion of the regulation, the operating permit will be re-opened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – The installation operates under two (2) different modes of operation, raw mill on and raw mill off. The operational parameters to control SVM, LVM, Hydrochloric Acid, Chlorine Gas, opacity, CO, and THC emissions and DRE do not change as operational modes change, therefore the different modes of operation condition under §63.1209(q) will not be included in the SVM, LVM, Hydrochloric Acid, Chlorine Gas, opacity, CO, and THC
emissions and DRE conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Performance Testing – According to Lone Star for all emission levels established under LLL or EEE, the worse emission and most stringent operations limit occurs with the raw mill off. The industry is negotiating with the agency to establish operating parameter limits under the worse conditions and by default in compliance under the other condition(s). This condition will remain in the operating permit as written. If EPA decides to revise 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, the operating permit can be reopened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit conditions.

EU0500 Conditions – Alternate Monitoring Scenario for EEE – The installation would like the ability to have an alternate monitoring scenario for EEE when not burning hazardous waste. This was set up in the operating permit by giving the installation the ability to move back and forth between 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and Subpart LLL monitoring, record keeping, performance testing when the installation was not burning hazardous waste fuel. The installation has submitted a request to EPA Region VII for an alternate monitoring scenario under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE. If the alternate monitoring scenario is approved by EPA Region VII, the requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL will be removed from the
cement kiln emission unit.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 10 Project No. 031-0021-023

The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing portland cement plant that is a major or an area source. The affected sources subject to this regulation are:

• Each kiln and each in-line kiln/raw mill at any major or area source, including alkali bypasses, except for kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that burn hazardous waste and are subject to and regulated under subpart EEE of this part;

• Each clinker cooler at any portand cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each finish mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major source and each greenfield raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major or area source;

• Each conveying system transfer point at any portland cement plant that is a major

source;

• Each bagging system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; and

• Each bulk loading or unloading system at any portland cement plant that is a major

source; The installation is a major source of HAPs, and therefore the kiln, raw mill, clinker cooler, finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system and bulk loading /unloading systems are covered by the MACT. The long-dry process kiln does contain an alkali bypass and an in-line raw mill.

The MACT for the portland cement manufacturing industry was finalized on June 14, 1999. This regulation is still under negotiations with industry. The regulation is likely to change as a result of negotiation and litigation and certain changes may be necessary to the operating permit.

If 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL is revised, the installation is subject to the revised standard. For operating permits with an expiration date more than three (3) years away, the permitshould be reopened to incorporate the new requirements. The mechanism for this reopening, under the current Part 70 rules, would be a “re-opening for cause”. The installation should request a “re-opening of the operating permit for cause, upon rule modifications in the federal register. The changes to the permit will be made as expeditiously as possible, but no later than eighteen (18) months. As long as the installation is meeting the requirements of the revised rule, it is deemed to be in compliance. The Air Pollution Control Program would not view the installation as being in violation of the operating permit if the installation is complying with the revisions to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE as published in the federal register.

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL – The first source affected are the raw material storage just prior to the raw mill. If the emission units are not the raw material storage prior to the raw mill, the emission units are not covered by LLL: “...the first affected source in the sequence of materials handling operations subject to this NESHAP is the raw material storage, which is just prior to the raw mill. The primary and secondary crushers and any other equipment in the non-metallic mineral processing plant, which precede the raw material storage are not affected sources under this NESHAP. The first conveyor system transfer point subject to this NESHAP is the transfer point associated with the conveyor transferring material from the raw material storage to
the raw mill.” Based on this definition, the first emission units affected by 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL are the raw material storage silos (EU0150 through EU0220) and the conveyor transfer points that transfer material to from the storage silos to the raw mill (EU230, EU0470 – EU0490) : EU0150 – Raw Material Sotrage Silo W-4501 (Limestone) EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore)

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 11 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli) EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale) EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum) EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone) EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash) EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash) EU0230 - Hopper/Weigh Belt R-3202
EU0470 - Transfer Belt R-3801
EU0480 - Transfer Belt R-3803
EU0490 - Transfer Belt R-3700

The kiln system has an in-line raw mill and the kiln gases may pass through the raw mill or ducted around the raw mill. In either case, the emissions pass through the same air pollution dust collector and are vented through the same stack. According to a September 7, 1995, memorandum on the Opacity Limitation for “In-line” Portland Cement Plants from
John Rasnic: “In an April 6, 1995, memorandum regarding “Opacity Limitations for the Portland Cement Plant New Source Performance Standards “ (NSPS), we stated that where gases originate in one affected facility and pass through another affected facility as part of the manufacturing process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) applies the emission limitation or standard for the affected facility from which the gases are discharged directly into the atmosphere. In the example discussed in the April 6, 1995, memorandum, kiln gases are routed through a raw mill, and we state that the raw mill opacity limitation of 10% applies. Where the kiln and raw mill operate as separate affected facilities, this
determination continues to be correct. However, many dry process portland cement plants are constructed in an “in-line” fashion where the kiln, precalciner, preheater and raw mill are integrated so that the kiln gases are used to perform the drying activity in the raw mill and the raw mill is simply an extension of the kiln. In this “in-line” system, no independent raw mill activity exists and the raw mill does not generate a separate gas stream. The kiln is capable of operating without the raw mill but the raw mill can not operate without the kiln gases. In this configuration, the raw mill does not exist as a separate NSPS affected facility. Consequently, we believe it is appropriate for the gases exiting the “in-line” kiln/raw mill combination to be subject to the twenty percent (20%) opacity limit and the 0.30 pounds per ton of feed particulate matter limit which applies to kilns in... ...Any time the raw mill operates independently without kiln gas, the ten percent (10%) opacity limit applies. If the facility also exhaust gases through an alkali bypass stack, the emissions from the bypass stack must also meet the twenty percent (20%) opacity limit and the combines particulate matter emission from the bypass stack and the “in-line” kiln/raw mill main stack must meet the 0.30 pounds per ton of feed particulate matter limit.” The application of the limits from the MACT are applied in a similar manner as mentioned for
the NSPS in the referenced memorandum.

The clinker cooler at the plant is an enclosed system. According to the installation, the equipment has been previously included with the kiln and raw mill on EIQs, but the clinker
cooler makes no contribution to the emissions from those sources. Most emissions are vented through a heat exchanger and back into the clinker cooler. Some of the process air is also used to heat the coal mills. The clinker cooler system does not vent directly to the atmosphere, therefore it is not subject to the requirements of the Portland Cement Manufacturing MACT.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 12 Project No. 031-0021-023

PW006 – Operations and Maintenance Plan – According to Lone Star, EPA and industry are currently negotiating provisions of the ongoing SSM plan part of the Part 70 permit. This condition has been placed in the operating permit, but if EPA decides to re-open 40 CFR Part63, Subpart LLL and re-write this portion of the regulation, the operating permit will be reopened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit
conditions.

PW008 and EU0500 Conditions – Performance Testing – Lone Star is wanting to comply with the MACT standards using the testing and emission averaging scenarios under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE. The installation would prefer not to be required to test under the requirements for 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE and LLL. These conditions have been placed in the operating permit, but Lone Star can request alternate methodologies when submitting their performance test plan to EPA Region VII. If EPA grants an alternate test plan methodology and emission averaging scenario, the operating permit will be re-opened for cause to remove the requirements no longer applicable and revise the permit conditions. NESHAP Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos The installation is subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart V, National Emission Standard for Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources) The provisions of this subpart apply to each of the following sources that are intended to operate in volatile hazardous air pollutant (VHAP) service: pumps, compressors, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, open-ended valves or lines, valves, flanges and other connectors, product accumulator vessels, and control devices or systems required by this subpart. 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD references Subpart V, however as stated previously, the installation is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD. The installation is subject to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M and Subpart FF and neither subpart references Subpart V. Therefore, the installation is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart V and it was not included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF, National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations The provisions of this subpart apply to owners and operators of chemical manufacturing plants, coke by-product recovery plants and petroleum refineries. The provisions of this subpart apply to owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities that treat store, or dispose of hazardous waste generated by any facility listed above in the first sentence. The waste streams at hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities subject to the provisions of this subpart are the benzene-containing hazardous waste from any facility listed above in the first sentence. A hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facility is a facility that must obtain a hazardous waste management permit under subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. The provisions of this subpart apply to wastewater streams, storage tanks, surfaceimpoundments, individual drain systems, oil-water separators, treatment processes, closedvent systems and control devices. The requirements for 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF have been included in the operating permit for the storage tanks and the treatment processes. The testing requirements listed in Subpart FF for the treatment process were not included in the operating permit since Lone

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 13 Project No. 031-0021-023

Star has already demonstrated a DRE of at least 99.99% in their previous testing at the installation and the testing requirements do not indicate a repeat frequency.

Other Regulatory Determinations 10 CSR 10-3.050, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes

, This rule is not applicable to the grinding, crushing and classifying operations at a rock quarry. The installation has quarry operations and raw material handling operations. The operations occurring prior to the raw material storage piles were considered quarry operations and the operations occurring after the storage piles were considered raw material handling operations. Therefore, the 10 CSR 10-3.050 was not applied to the following units: Drilling Blasting Hopper A-1601 Primary Crusher A-1700 Transfer Belts A-1900/A-2000

10 CSR 10-3.050, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes

,

EU0060 – Hopper (W-4600) EU0080 – Transfer Belt (W-4900) EU0090 – Transfer Belt (W-5000) The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process basedon the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP42 Section 13.2.4, is eighteen and nine tenths (18.9) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0070 – Hammermill Crusher (W-4800) – Primary The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.016 lbs/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6- 4, is four and eight tenths (4.8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately thirteen (13) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0100 – Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0240 – Barge Unloading to Trucks The particulate matter emission limit is 61 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process basedon the MHDR (250/Tons Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP42 Section 13.2.4, is fifteen and seventy-five hundredths (15.75) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0110 – Hopper (W-5301) EU0120 – Transfer Belt (W-5700) EU0130 – Transfer Belt (W-3800) EU0140 – Hopper/Rotary Selector (W-4000) The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 14 Project No. 031-0021-023

of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is seven and twenty-two (22) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0150 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4501 (Limestone) EU0160 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4502 (Diaspore) EU0170 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4503 (Tripoli) EU0180 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4504 (Mill Scale) EU0190 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4511 (Gypsum) EU0200 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4512 (Limestone) The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is sevenand twenty-two (22) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is one and one tenth (1.1) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is fifty-nine (59) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0210 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4505 (Fly Ash) EU0220 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4506 (Fly Ash) The particulate matter emission limit is 58.5 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (200 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twelveand six tenths (12.6) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is six (6) tenths (0.6) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is four and five tenths (4.5) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is ninety-seven (97) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0230 – Hopper Weigh Belt (R-3202) The particulate matter emission limit is 25.2 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a Dust Collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (15 Tons/Hr)and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is ninetyfive hundredths (0.95) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is five hundredths (0.05) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is twenty six (26) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is over five hundred (500) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0250 – Hopper W-7100
EU0260 – Feeder Belt W-9800
EU0270 – Transfer Belt W-9700
EU0280 – Screen W-9701 The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is eight hundredths (0.08) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is over six hundred ninety (690) times less than the allowable emission rate. It

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 15 Project No. 031-0021-023

is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0290 – Transfer Belt W-7900
EU0300 – Reversible Transfer Belt W-8106 EU0310 – Solid Fuel Silo C-0900 (Coal) EU0320 – Solid Fuel Silo C-2300 (Coal) The particulate matter emission limit is 63 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is fifteen hundredths (0.15) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four hundred (400) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0330 – Transfer Belt C-1000 The particulate matter emission limit is 30.5 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is one hundredth (0.01) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0340 – Transfer Belt C-2400 The particulate matter emission limit is 19.2 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (10 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is five thousandths (0.005) lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0350 – RSP Mill SystemC-2500 EU0360 – Kiln Mill System C-1100 The particulate matter emission limit is 30.5 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector and a cyclone. The cyclone is an integral part of the process and does not act as a control device. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons Hr) and the emission factor (0.00051 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Section 13.2.4 equation (1), which uses a multiplier of 0.35 to yield a PM 10 emission factor of 0.00018, is one hundredth (0.01)lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a control efficiency of ninetyfour percent (94%) is 6 ten-thousandths (0.0006) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is over one thousand (1000) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0390 – Barge Unloading to Trucks EU0400 – Truck Loading The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is nine and five tenths (9.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately six (6) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 16 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0410 – Hopper Loading KB-7000
EU0420 – Transfer Belt KB-7200
EU0430 – Transfer Belt KB-7400
EU0440 – Elevator KB-7500
EU0450 – Transfer Belt KB-7600
EU0460 – Transfer Belt KB-7700 The particulate matter emission limit is 8.56 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (3 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is two tenths (0.2) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately forty-two (42) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 17 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0470 – Raw Material Transfer to Mill R-3801
EU0480 – Transfer Belt R-3803
EU0490 - Transfer Belt R-3700 The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0500 – Kiln (KB-5100) EU0510 – Raw Mill System R-4300 The particulate matter emission limit is 61.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a cyclone separator and a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (265 Tons Clinker/Hr) and the emission factor (7.149 lbs/Ton Clinker) from an October 1995 stack test, is one thousand eight hundred ninety four (1894) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on an overall control efficiency of ninety-eight and two hundred twenty five thousandths percent (98.225%) is thirty three and six tenths (33.6) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process is approximately 50% of the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU0540 – Raw Blend Silo B-0701
EU0550 – Raw Blend Silo B-0702
EU0560 – Raw Blend Silo B-0703
EU0570 – Raw Blend Silo B-0704
EU0590 – Raw Blend Elevator KB-1600 EU0600 – Air Slide (KB-1808) EU0610 – Kiln Feed Bin (KB-1700) The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on an overall control efficiency of ninety-five percent (95%) is one and two hundredths (1.02) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately sixty-two (62) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0580 – Transfer Belt KB-1200 The particulate matter emission limit is 63.9 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (325 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.063 lbs/Ton) from equation 1 of AP-42 Section 13.2.4, is twenty and five tenths (20.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for this process based on an overall control efficiency of ninety-four percent (94%) is one and twenty-three hundredths (1.23) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately fifty-two (52) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 18 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU0620 – Truck Loading KB-3821 The particulate matter emission limit is 40.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (30 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.30 lbs/Ton) from the Fire Factor for SCC 3-05-006-12, is nine (9) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is 5 tenths (0.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0630 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3800 EU0640 – CKD Storage Silo KB-3900 The particulate matter emission limit is 12.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (5 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.30 lbs/Ton) from the Fire Factor for SCC 3-05-006-12, is one and five tenths (1.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is one tenth (0.1) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately eight (8) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0650 – Drag Conveyor KC-501 EU0660 – Drag Conveyor KC-502
EU0670 – Elevator KC-0601
EU0680 – Elevator KC-0602 EU0690 – Truck Loading The particulate matter emission limit is 57.1 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for theprocess based on the MHDR (175 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lbs/Ton) from AP42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is seven (7) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately eight (8) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0700 – Clinker Transfer Belt W-6100 The particulate matter emission limit is 58.5 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (200 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is eight (8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately seven (7) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0730 – Hopper Loading W-9200
EU0740 – Transfer Belt W-7900
EU0750 – Transfer Belt W-8200
EU0760 - Transfer Belt KC-1000

EU0770 – Diverter Box KC-0603
EU0780 – Clinker Bin W-6601 EU0790 – Storage Silo W-4508 (Clinker #4) EU0800 – Storage Silo W-4509 (Clinker #5) EU0810 – Storage Silo W-4510 (Clinker #6) The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr)

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 19 Project No. 031-0021-023

and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0820 – Transfer Belt KC-2600
EU0830 – Transfer Belt KC-2620
EU0840 – Clinker Silo KC-2901
EU0850 – Clinker Silo KC-2902
EU0860 – Clinker Silo KC-2903
EU0870 – Transfer Belt KC-2630 EU0880 – Weigh Feeder KC-3002 EU0890 – Weigh Feeder KC-3005 EU0900 – Weigh Feeder KC-3008
EU0910 – Transfer Belt KC-3200
EU0920 – Bucket Elevator KC-3400
EU0930 – Bucket Elevator KC-2550
EU0940 – Transfer Belt KC-3600 The particulate matter emission limit is 63.0 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a baghouse. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (9.2 lb/Ton) from FIRE for SCC 3-05-006-14, is two thousand seven hundred sixty (2760) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a control efficiency of ninety-eight and six tenths percent (98.6%) is thirty eight and six tenths (38.6) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately forty-four (44) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately one and six tenths (1.6) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU0950 – Truck Loading The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0960 – Hopper TL-5000
EU0970 – Transfer Belt TL-5300
EU0980 – Transfer Belt TL-5500 EU0990 – Barge Loading The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a fabric filter. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is fourteen (14) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately four (4) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 20 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1000 – Drag Conveyor F-8701 EU1010 – Drag Conveyor F-12701
EU1020 – Elevator F-8702
EU1030 – Elevator F-12701 The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.04 lb/Ton) from AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-16, is six (6) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately nine (9) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU1040 – Finish Mill F-12900
EU1050 – Finish Mill F-8900 The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector and a cyclone. The cyclone is an integral part of the process and does not act as a control device. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (96 lb/Tons) from the Fire Factor for SCC 3-05-006-17, is 14400 lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR and a controlled emission factor for a fabric filter (0.008 lbs/Ton) is one and two tenths (1.2) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately forty-six (46) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU1060 – Separator F-13500 EU1070 – Separator F-9500 The particulate matter emission limit is 64.8 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (350 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.56 lb/Tons) from the AP-42 Table 11.6-4 for SCC 3-05-006-29, is one hundred ninety-six (196) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on the a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is ten (10) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately six (6) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU1080 – Hopper for Finish Mill #4
EU1090 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #4 EU1100 – Hopper for Finish Mill#5
EU1110 – Air Slide for Finish Mill #5
EU1220 – EU1370 Old Cement Silos 21 – 36 The particulate matter emission limit is 55.4 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (150 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is forty and five tenths (40.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is two and three hundredths (2.03) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is one and four tenths (1.4) times less than the allowable emision rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-seven (27) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 21 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1120 – EU1210 New Cement Silos 37-46 The particulate matter emission limit is 54.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with two dust collectors. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is thirty-seven and eight tenths (37.8) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-nine and sixty-four hundredths percent (99.64%) control efficiency is one tenth (0.1) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolle emission rate is approximately one and four tenths (1.4) times less than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately four hundred (400) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU1380 – EU1400 River Cement Silos 47 – 49 The particulate matter emission limit is 66.3 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (400 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is one hundred eight (108) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on a ninety-four percent (94%) control efficiency is six and five tenths (6.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately one and six tenths (1.6) times greater than the allowabe emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately ten (10) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control device is operating properly.

EU1410 – Cement Transfer Belt D-4800
EU1420 – Cement Transfer Belt
EU1430 – Transfer Belt D-4100
EU1440 – Transfer Belt D-4200 The particulate matter emission limit is 74.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with two (2) dust collectors. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (800 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is twohundred sixteen (216) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninetynine and sixty-four hundredths percent (99.64%) control efficiency is seventy-eight hundredths (0.78) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately ninety six (96) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU1450 – Barge Loading TL-0800
EU1460 – Distribution Box D-6900
EU1470 – Elevator TL-0400 The particulate matter emission limit is 77.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (1000 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is twohundred seventy (270) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninetyfive percent (95%) control efficiency is thirteen and five tenths (13.5) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three and five tenths (3.5) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately six (6) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 22 Project No. 031-0021-023

EU1480 – Air Slide The particulate matter emission limit is 74.7 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (800 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is two hundred sixteen (216) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is ten and eight tenths (10.8) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately seven (7) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU1490 – Cement Bins (Truck) EU1500 – Truck Loading The particulate matter emission limit is 61 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (250 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.27 lb/Ton) from the AP-42 Table 11.12-2, is sixty-seven and five tenths (67.5) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-five percent (95%) control efficiency is three and four tenths (3.4) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the controlled emission rate is approximately eighteen (18) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, record keeping and monitoring will be required to demonstrate that the control devices are operating properly.

EU1510 – Raw Material Storage Silo W-4500 The particulate matter emission limit is 44.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (50 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.4 lb/Tons) from engineering calculations, is 20 lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-four percent (94%) control efficiency is one and two tenths (1.2) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, no record keeping or monitoring is required.

EU1520 – Truck Unloading The particulate matter emission limit is 44.6 lbs/hr. The process is equipped with a dust collector. The uncontrolled emission rate for the process based on the MHDR (50 Tons/Hr) and the emission factor (0.30 lb/Tons) from the FIRE factor for SCC 3-05-006-12, is fifteen (15) lbs/hr. The controlled emission rate for the process based on ninety-four percent (94%) control efficiency is nine tenths (0.9) lbs/hr. At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately three (3) times less than the allowable emission rate. Therefore, no record keeping or monitoring is required.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Operating Permits Exempt Emission Units: Combustion equipment that has a capacity of less than ten (10) MMBTU/Hr heat input by using exclusively natural or liquefied petroleum gas, or any combination of these; or less than one (1) MMBTU/Hr heat input. The following emission units are exempt from the requirements of this rule.

Equipment MMBTU/Hr Fuel 2 Space Heaters 0.3 Kerosene

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds Screen Three (3) models were ran for the sulfur oxide emissions at the maximum hourly design rate for the fuel burning stacks. The kiln uses coal, waste derived liquid fuel and

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 23 Project No. 031-0021-023

waste oil with a 2.69% sulfur limit on the waste derived liquid fuel (WDLF) and waste oil from construction permit number: 0392-001. The process heaters, raw mills and back-up generator use #2 fuel oil, which has a sulfur limit of 0.5%. The space heater uses kerosene. The maximum one-(1) hour concentration of the stacks were calculated as follows:

Maximum 1-Hr Max. Annual Equipment Conc. (μg/m 3 ) Conc. (μg/m 3 )
Process Heater C-1400 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.06 0.005
Process Heater C-2800 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.06 0.005
Raw Mill Heater R-4601 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.18 0.014
Raw Mill Heater R-4602 - #2 Fuel Oil 0.18 0.014
Total 0.48 0.038

It was assumed that with the equipment listed above, the two (2) space Heaters (Kerosene) and two (2) Back-up Generators (#2 Fuel Oil) that the Maximum Annual Concentration would not exceed 0.5 μg/m 3

.

Screen Three (3) models were then ran on the kiln for the 2.69% WDLF and waste oil and for 5%, 6.8% and 6.6%. The maximum one-(1) hour concentration of the stacks were calculated
as follows:
Maximum 1-Hr Max. Annual Equipment Conc. (μg/m 3 ) Conc. (μg/m 3 )
Kiln – 2.69% WDLF 129 10.32
Kiln – 2.69% Waste Oil 129 10.32
Kiln – 5% Coal 549.3 43.94
Kiln – 6.8% Coal 747 59.76
Kiln – 6.6% Coal 725.1 58.08
Totals with 5% Coal 807.8 64.62
Totals with 6.8% Coal 1005.5 80.44
Totals with 6.6% Coal 983.6 78.69

The maximum concentration of the stacks together with 6.6% sulfur content value of the coal (78.69 μg/m 3 ) is ninety-eight percent (98%) of the annual ambient air level for sulfur dioxide (80 μg/m 3 ). It is highly unlikely that the units will exceed the emission limitation or the ambient air level when the sulfur content of the fuels is as follows: coal - 6.6% by weight, WDLF and waste oil - 2.69% by weight and the #2 fuel oil units - 0.5% by weight. Therefore, an emission limitation on the sulfur contents of the fuels will be placed in the permit and the record keeping will be required for the sulfur contents. However, if additional fuel burning units are placed at the installation the sulfur content limit of the coal will have to be re-examined.



### September 24, 1990 Settlement Agreement between Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Attorney General and Lone Star Industries, Inc. The settlement agreement established a timeline for the installation of a new system of air flows through various processes at the cement plant to reduce the number of previous excess emissions. The installation has completed the installation of the air flow system and therefore the requirements of the September 24, 1990, Settlement Agreement were not included in the operating permit.

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. SB - 24 Project No. 031-0021-023

Other Regulations Not Cited in the Operating Permit or the Above Statement of Basis Any regulation which is not specifically listed in either the Operating Permit or in the above Statement of Basis does not appear, based on this review, to be an applicable requirement for this installation for one (1) or more of the following reasons:

1. The specific pollutant regulated by that rule is not emitted by the installation;

2. The installation is not in the source category regulated by that rule;

3. The installation is not in the county or specific area that is regulated under the authority of that rule;

4. The installation does not contain the type of emission unit which is regulated by that rule;
5. The rule is only for administrative purposes.

Should a later determination conclude that the installation is subject to one (1) or more of the regulations cited in this Statement of Basis or other regulations which were not cited, the installation shall determine and demonstrate, to the APCP's satisfaction, the installation's compliance with that regulation(s). If the installation is not in compliance with a regulation which was not previously cited, the installation shall submit to the APCP a schedule for achieving compliance for that regulation(s).

Prepared by:

Pamela Muren Environmental Engineer

### Lone Star Industries, Inc. 300 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06912

Re: Lone Star Industries, Inc. Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, Cape Girardeau County Permit Number:

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed with this letter is your operating permit. Please review this document carefully. Operation of your installation in accordance with the rules and regulations cited in this document is necessary for continued compliance.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this permit, please contact the Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) at (573) 751-4817, or you may write to the Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond
Permit Section Chief

RER:pmk

Enclosures

c: US EPA Region VII Southeast Regional Office PATs File: 031-0021-023

### August 8, 2000

Dennis Dobson CERTIFIED MAIL: Z 445 169 053 Lone Star Industries, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 300 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06912

Re: Draft Title V Operating Permit – Project No.: 031-0021-023

Dear Dobson:

The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has completed the preliminary review of your Title V permit application. A public notice will be placed in the Southeast Missourian on August 13, 2000. The conditions and monitoring requirements of the draft permit are open for comment by the public and you until September 12, 2000. Standard permit wording (i.e. General Requirements) is not open for comment, since these provisions are required by law and regulation.

The APCP will accept comments regarding the conditions and monitoring regulations that are postmarked on or before the closing date. Please address comments or recommendations for changes to my attention at:

Operating Permits Unit Air Pollution Control Program
P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102

A copy of this draft has also been sent to the U.S. EPA’s Region VII office in Kansas City for their review. The Region VII office is afforded, by law, oversight authority on any Title V permit which Missouri (or any of the other states in the region) may propose to issue. A public hearing may be held if sufficient interest is expressed by the public.

Should you have any questions, or wish clarification on any items in this draft permit, please feel free to contact me at (573) 751-4817.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Pamela Muren Environmental Engineer

PM/blw

Enclosures
c: PATS File

### August 8, 2000

Allen Elliot Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Quality
803 Schenkel Lane Frankfort, KY 40601

RE: Affected States Review – Notification of Proposed Final Part 70 Operating Permit

Dear Mr. Elliot:

In accordance with Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(F)1. and the Clean Air Act this letter is to notify you of public notice of the preliminary draft and request for comments for:

Lone Star Industries, Inc., Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 Project Number - 031-0021-023

Public notice will be published in the Southeast Missourian, Cape Girardeau on August 13, 2000.

You are invited to submit any relevant information, materials, and views in support of or in opposition to the draft operating permits in writing by no later than September 12, 2000 to my attention at Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Should you require further information or documentation on this matter, please contact the Operating Permits Unit at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond
Permit Section Chief

RER:pmb