1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time - 3 07 70011 JL 1

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

MARK L. KROTOSKI (CABN 138549)

Chief, Criminal Division

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE (CABN 193425)

Assistant United States Attorneys

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7102

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

E-mail: julie.arbuckle@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERNON WHITE,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3 07 70011 JL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

On March 15, 2007, the parties in this case appeared before the Court and stipulated that time

should be excluded from the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act, Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 5.1, and 18 U.S.C. §3142(f)(2)(B) from March 15, 2007 to April 10, 2007 for effective

preparation of counsel. The parties represented that there is good cause for granting the

continuance, and that it was the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel,

taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties

also agreed that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweighed the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

Case 3:07-mj-70011-JL Document 12 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:07-mj-70011-MRGD Document 13 Filed 03/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time - 3 07 70011 JL 2

SO STIPULATED:

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

DATED: March 16, 2007 _________/s/__________

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: March 20, 2007 _________/s/__________

STEVEN KALAR

Attorney for Defendant Vernon White

As the Court found on March 15, 2007, and for the reasons stated above, the Court finds that

the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial and that time should be excluded from the calculations under the

Speedy Trial Act, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, and 18 U.S.C. §3142(f)(2)(B) from

March 15, 2007 to April 10, 2007 for good cause and the effective preparation of counsel. See

18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny counsel

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). 

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _____________________________________

Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:07-mj-70011-JL Document 12 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 2 of 2


03/23/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:07-mj-70011-MRGD Document 13 Filed 03/26/07 Page 2 of 2