alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), International 2-Up ATV Manufacturers' Association (“I2AMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: International 2-Up ATV Manufacturers' Association, Prior Lake, MN. The nature and scope of I2AMA's standards development activities are: to develop proposed American National Standards for four-wheeled, two person tandem, all terrain vehicles (                    *i.e.*                     2-Up ATV) based on knowledge, design, safety and testing of such vehicles.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27541  Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7731

FRANK GARCIA, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RAYMOND SMITH,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-97-109-6)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Garcia, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* While the district court did not specifically discuss Appellant's claim regarding the filing of tax forms as "new evidence"

warranting habeas relief, we find this claim to be without merit

for the same reasons the district court dismissed Appellant's other

"new evidence" claims. See Stockton v. Virginia, 852 F.2d 740, 749

(4th Cir. 1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court.* Garcia v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina, No. CA-97-109-6

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 1997). To the extent Appellant seeks to raise

issues in this court which were not first presented to the district

court for consideration, we decline to review those issues. We

further deny Appellant's motion for production of documents and for

return of personal property. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2438 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2438

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydrazine Hydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydrazine Hydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDRAZINE HYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Hydrazine Hydrate   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 302-01-                                                   31/2009
                         2) (provided for
                         in Subheading
                         2825.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 241

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Received 

AN ACT

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash 

contributions for the relief of victims of the Indian Ocean 

tsunami.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 241 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR 

2 CHARITABLE CASH CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RE3 LIEF OF INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI VICTIMS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 170 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any 

6 contribution described in subsection (b) made in January 

7 2005 as if such contribution was made on December 31, 

8 2004, and not in January 2005. 

9 (b) CONTRIBUTION DESCRIBED.—A contribution is 

10 described in this subsection if such contribution is a cash 

11 contribution made for the relief of victims in areas af12 fected by the December 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami 

13 for which a charitable contribution deduction is allowable 

14 under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4174 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4174

   To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century with 
  respect to the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation 
                 Pilot Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2012

 Mrs. Ellmers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century with 
  respect to the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation 
                 Pilot Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Tolls in North Carolina Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. INTERSTATE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION PILOT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1216(b)(2) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st 
Century (23 U.S.C. 129 note) is amended by striking ``State.'' and 
inserting ``State, except that no such facility may be located in North 
Carolina.''.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers



  
 Exhibit 10.32

 STATEMENT OF AMENDMENT TO THE 
 WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR
OFFICERS 
 The Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers (the “Plan”) shall be amended, as
set forth below, effective as of January 1, 2011. 
 1. Section 1.8 of the Plan is hereby revised and replaced with
the following: 
 “1.8 Earnings 
 “Earnings” means the rate of interest applicable to a Participant’s Salary Deferral Account. The rate shall equal the Company’s weighted average interest rate on its fixed rate
bonds as of December 31 of each calendar year. Such rate may be changed to any other rate approved by the Board as of any subsequent January 1.” 
 *    *    * 
 To record adoption of this Statement of
Amendment to the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers by the Board as of October 27, 2010, the Trust has caused its authorized officer to execute this Statement of Amendment. 

 

			
	 Washington Real Estate Investment Trust

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Laura M. Franklin

		 	 Laura M. Franklin

EVP and Corporate Secretary




  
 1
#### John Molinari, Respondent, v. Garden Party House, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Motion granted and time for filing record and briefs extended to November 2, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before November 17, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at November 1960 Term.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00442

- CV

IN RE Jose "Joe" HINOJOSA

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Jason Pulliam, Justice

On July 17, 2015

, relat or Jose “Joe” Hinojosa filed a petition for writ s of mandamus and prohibition and a motion for emergency relief

. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for wr it of

mandamus and motion for emergency relief are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on July 17, 2015

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CVZ

- 000338 D3, styled Jose "Joe" Hinojosa v. Firefighters and Police Officers' Civil Service Commis sion of the City of Laredo, Texas; Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu Jr., Jesus Torres and Luis Dovalina, Individually , pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding.
### §3056f. Report

To carry out the Secretary's responsibilities for reporting in section 3056a(g) of this title, the Secretary shall require the State agency for each State that receives funds under this subchapter to prepare and submit a report at the beginning of each fiscal year on such State's compliance with section 3056e(b) of this title. Such report shall include the names and geographic location of all projects assisted under this subchapter and carried out in the State and the amount allocated to each such project under section 3056d of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §508, as added Pub. L. 109–365, title V, §501, Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2579.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3056f, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §508, as added Pub. L. 106–501, title V, §501, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2280, required annual report on State's compliance with section 3056e(b) of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 109–365.

Another prior section 3056f, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §508, formerly title IX, §908, as added Pub. L. 94–135, title I, §113(a), Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 725; renumbered title V, §508, and amended Pub. L. 95–478, title I, §105(a), (g), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1547, 1548; Pub. L. 97–115, §12(g), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1607; Pub. L. 98–459, title V, §504, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1787; Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §165, Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 958; Pub. L. 102–375, title V, §505, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1269, related to authorization of appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 106–501.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4430 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Pyrithiobac-sodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Pyrithiobacsodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYRITHIOBAC-SODIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.45 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pyrithiobac-sodium) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4430 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 35.1 General. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Public Law 99-509, sections. 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (October 21, 1986), codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. 31 U.S.C. 3809 of the statute requires each authority head to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents; and specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
( c ) *Special considerations abroad.* Where a party, witness or material evidence in a proceeding under these regulations is located abroad, the investigating official, reviewing official or ALJ, as the case may be, may adjust the provisions below for service, filing of documents, time limitations, and related matters to meet special problems arising out of that location.
#### § 232.12 Prosecution of claims.

After payment by USAID to an Applicant hereunder, USAID shall have exclusive power to prosecute all claims related to rights to receive payments under the Eligible Notes to which it is thereby subrogated. If a Noteholder continues to have an interest in the outstanding Eligible Notes, such a Noteholder and USAID shall consult with each other with respect to their respective interests in such Eligible Notes and the manner of and responsibility for prosecuting claims.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4315 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility 

for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat service during 

certain periods of hostilities and war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. CARNAHAN (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. SPEIER, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Ms. WATERS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. ALTMIRE, 

Ms. CHU, Ms. HAHN, and Ms. RICHARDSON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for 

veterans of combat service during certain periods of hostilities and war. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Mental 

5 Health Accessibility Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4315 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR 

2 MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR VETERANS OF COM3 BAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 

4 HOSTILITIES AND WAR. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(F) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a vet9 eran who served on active duty in a theater of combat 

10 operations (as determined by the Secretary in consultation 

11 with the Secretary of Defense) during World War II, the 

12 Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 

13 Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, 

14 or any other period of war after the Persian Gulf War, 

15 or in combat against a hostile force during a period of 

16 hostilities (as defined in section 1712A(a)(2)(B) of this 

17 title), is eligible for hospital care, medical services, and 

18 nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 

19 mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient 

20 medical evidence to conclude that such illness is attrib21 utable to such service.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subparagraph (F) of section 

23 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

24 subsection (a), shall apply with respect to hospital care, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4315 IH

1 medical services, and nursing home care provided on or 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Charles Walzer, Appellant-Respondent, v. Morris B. Rettner, Respondent-Appellant.

First Department,

June 14, 1960.

*11
      *Michael M. Kirsch*of counsel *(Goodman & Mabel,*attorneys), for appellant-respondent.

*Marvin L. Levitt*of counsel *(Melvin J. Katz*with him on the brief; *Marvin L. Levitt,*attorney), for respondent-appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The first two causes of action of the complaint were dismissed at the end of the plaintiff’s case, when both sides rested. The first cause alleged a species of tortious interference with plaintiff’s negotiations for the purchase of a real estate mortgage. The second cause alleged common-law fraud in connection with a joint venture agreement between the parties looking to the purchase of the afore-mentioned mortgage.

While the evidence in support of these two causes is far from impressive, and the damages allegedly suffered appear dubious, a prima facie case was made out on each of the first two causes. Plaintiff testified that defendant had agreed to pay him a finder’s fee of $5,000' for bringing to his attention the opportunity for both of them to purchase, at a radically reduced price, the first mortgage. If defendant had in fact agreed to pay such finder’s fee as an inextricable part of the joint venture, plaintiff was justified in insisting upon its payment before or upon paying his half of the purchase price of the mortgage. Issues of fact were presented that should have been submitted to the jury.

At the close of the case plaintiff moved for a directed verdict as to the third cause of action, which was granted, although *12defendant did not join in the motion. This cause of action alleged breach of the agreement to pay the finder’s fee. Although, as indicated, defendant did not elect ito call any witnesses on his behalf, plaintiff’s showing on the third cause was not conclusive enough to warrant the direction of a verdict; and this cause likewise should have been submitted to the jury.

The judgment should he reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial directed, with costs upon the appeal and cross appeal to abide the event.

Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, McNally and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial is directed, with costs upon the appeal and cross appeal to abide the event.
#### § 1509.115 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 1509.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,034
<SECURITIES>                                   377,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,285
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               785,059
<PP&E>                                       1,374,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 731,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,769,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,228
<BONDS>                                        317,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,309
<OTHER-SE>                                     809,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,769,738
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               554,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  393,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,724
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>