alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §18813. Leveraging smart manufacturing infrastructure at National Laboratories

#### (a) Study

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after November 15, 2021, the Secretary shall conduct a study on how the Department can increase access to existing high-performance computing resources in the National Laboratories, particularly for small and medium manufacturers.

#### (2) Inclusions

In identifying ways to increase access to National Laboratories under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A) focus on increasing access to the computing facilities of the National Laboratories; and

(B) ensure that—

(i) the information from the manufacturer is protected; and

(ii) the security of the National Laboratory facility is maintained.

#### (3) Report

Not later than 1 year after November 15, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing the results of the study.

#### (b) Actions for increased access

The Secretary shall facilitate access to the National Laboratories studied under subsection (a) for small and medium manufacturers so that small and medium manufacturers can fully use the high-performance computing resources of the National Laboratories to enhance the manufacturing competitiveness of the United States.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title V, §40533, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1069.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A LLEN LY N N J EFFRI ES, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. M . KN O W LES, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 55123 D. C. No . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 6 1 1 4 - ER ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia E dw a r d R a f

e e di e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner A l l en L ynn Jef fr i es appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en td en yi n g h i s 2 8 U . S . C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab eas p et i t i o n . W e d i sm i ss. J e f f r i e s c ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d of P r i s on T e rm s ’ s 2004 de c i s i on t o de ny h im p a r o le v io la te dh is r ig h t to du e p r o c e s s . D u r in g th e p e n d e n c yo f th is ap p e a l, 

# FI LED AU G 02 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 55123 2 thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of appe a l abi l i ty( “ C O A ” ) i s r e qui r e d t o c ha l l e nge th e d e n ia l o f

p a r o le . Se e H

a y w a rd v . M a rs h a ll , 603 F . 3d 546, 554 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( e n b a n c ) , overruled on other groun ds by Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 131 S . C t . 859 (201 1). W e c on strue J ef fr i es ’ s bri ef

i ng as a r equestfor aC O A . B ec ause Je ff ri es ha s notm a de as ubs t a nt i a l s how i ng of the de ni a l of

ac ons t i tut i ona l r i ght , w e de ny h is r e q u e s t a n dd is m is s h is ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 25 3(c) . J e f f r i e s ’ s m ot i on f

orc opi e s of

r e c or ds i s de ni e d. DI S MI S S E D.
Exhibit 31.2


I, Steven L. Ford, certify that

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kroll Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2003



By: /s/ Steven L. Ford
    ------------------------
    Steven L. Ford,
    Chief Financial Officer
### §291j–5. Limitation on amounts of loans guaranteed or directly made

The cumulative total of the principal of the loans outstanding at any time with respect to which guarantees have been issued, or which have been directly made, under this part may not exceed the lesser of—

(1) such limitations as may be specified in appropriations Acts, or

(2) in the case of loans covered by allotments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, $500,000,000; for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972, $1,000,000,000; and for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 1973, and June 30, 1974, $1,500,000,000.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §625, as added Pub. L. 91–296, title II, §201, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 347; amended Pub. L. 93–45, title I, §108(b)(2), June 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 93.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–45 provided for a limitation of $1,500,000,000 on amount of loans outstanding in the case of loans covered by allotments for fiscal year ending June 30, 1974.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,192
<PP&E>                                         159,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          602,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        200
<COMMON>                                       140,329
<OTHER-SE>                                    (428,799)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,486
<SALES>                                         92,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,441
<CGS>                                           52,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,191,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5,344)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (35,774)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,181,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,181,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 64,316
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,117,563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)



</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 11, 2008*/s/
                George P. Morris*George
                P. MorrisChief
                Financial Officer




The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.




Exhibit
      32.1
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 16, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-4 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the
various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The
capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 4, 2022
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                     
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                     
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
**
Exhibit 12.1 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

I, Leonid Gontmakher, certify the following: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of 4Front VenturesCorp. ******

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and 

 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change on the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors: 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:**June******** 30, 2020**

 

/s/ Leonid Gontmakher

Leonid Gontmakher

Chief ExecutiveOfficer
**
### §285b–7c. Tuberculosis

#### (a) In general

The Director of the National Institutes of Health may expand, intensify, and coordinate research and development and related activities of the Institutes with respect to tuberculosis including activities toward the goal of eliminating such disease.

#### (b) Certain activities

Activities under subsection (a) may include—

(1) enhancing basic and clinical research on tuberculosis, including drug resistant tuberculosis;

(2) expanding research on the relationship between such disease and the human immunodeficiency virus; and

(3) developing new tools for the elimination of tuberculosis, including public health interventions and methods to enhance detection and response to outbreaks of tuberculosis, including multidrug resistant tuberculosis.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §424C, as added Pub. L. 110–392, title II, §201, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4201.)
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Section
1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      JAMES H. LONGJames
      H. Long
                          Chief
      Executive Officer
                            
                            September
      2, 2009
Privacy PolicyDisclaimerNOAA's National Ocean ServiceNOAAU.S. Department of Commerce
#### Fairchild Warehouse Associates, L. L. C., et al., Appellants, v United Bank of Kuwait, PLC, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[716 NYS2d 62]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated August 16, 1999, as granted the motion of the defendant United Bank of Kuwait, PLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondent.

The plaintiff Fairchild Warehouse Associates, L. L. C., and its members (hereinafter collectively referred to as Fairchild) brought this action seeking, *inter alia,*damages for breach of contract, as well as for specific performance of an oral modification agreement. Fairchild asserts that an oral agreement was reached with a representative of United Bank of Kuwait, PLC (hereinafter the Bank of Kuwait), in which the Bank of Kuwait agreed not to exercise its right to declare Fairchild in default of a mortgage agreement and Fairchild agreed to apply rental *279income from the subject property towards reduction of the principal balance. The Bank of Kuwait denies the existence of an oral modification agreement, asserting that, in any event, the original mortgage prohibited oral modifications.

Generally, a written agreement which includes a proscription against oral modifications can only be changed by an “ex-ecutory agreement * * * in writing” (General Obligations Law § 15-301 [1]). However, an oral modification is enforceable if the party seeking enforcement can demonstrate partial performance of the oral modification, which performance must be unequivocally referable to the modification *(see, Rose v Spa Realty Assocs.,*42 NY2d 338, 343). Contrary to the contention of the Bank of Kuwait, Fairchild raised a triable issue of fact in response to the motion for summary judgment by submitting evidence showing partial performance of the alleged oral modification *(see, Rose v Spa Realty Assocs., supra; Zipser v Zipser,*244 AD2d 548). Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

C 08-02313

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

Oakland Division

U-HAUL CO. OF CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CITY OF BERKELEY,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-02313 LB

ORDER SETTING DATE FOR JOINT

STATUS REPORT

On February 11, 2010, the parties filed a Joint Status Report in this matter. According to the

parties, the January 27, 2010 hearing in Alameda Superior Court regarding Defendant’s Demurrer

was continued and will now be heard on March 10, 2010. As a result, the Court hereby ORDERS

the parties to file a Joint Status Report by March 24, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2010 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-02313-LB Document 50 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 1
### §§300a–21 to 300a–28. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §955(b), title XXI, §2193(f), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 592, 828

Section 300a–21, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §601, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3595, set forth Congressional findings and declaration of purpose with respect to grant program.

Section 300a–22, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §602, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3595; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695, defined terms "Secretary", "eligible person", "eligible grant recipient", "core services", "supplemental services", "adolescent parent".

Section 300a–23, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §603, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3596, set forth authority to make grants.

Section 300a–24, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §604, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3597, set forth authorized uses for grants.

Section 300a–25, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §605, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3597, set forth provisions respecting priorities, amounts, and duration of grants.

Section 300a–26, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §606, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3598, set forth application, etc., requirements for grant approval.

Section 300a–27, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §607, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3601; Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2193(a)(2), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 827, authorized appropriations from fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1979, through fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1982.

Section 300a–28, Pub. L. 95–626, title VI, §608, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3601, set forth prohibition respecting use of funds to pay for performance of abortion.

See section 300z et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §955(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 592, provided that the repeal of sections 300a–21 to 300a–28 of this title is effective Oct. 1, 1981.

For effective date, savings, and transitional provisions relating to the repeal of sections 321a–21 to 321a–28 of this title by section 2193(f) of Pub. L. 97–35, and relating to the amendment of section 300a–27 of this title by section 2193(a)(2) of Pub. L. 97–35, see section 2194 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 701 of this title.

#### Study of Adolescent Pregnancy; Report Not Later Than November 10, 1979

Pub. L. 95–626, title VIII, §801, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3602, which provided for a study of the problem of adolescent pregnancies and the effectiveness of existing programs and a report, was repealed by section 955(b) of Pub. L. 97–35.