alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4353 

To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Ms. MATSUI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize certain civil works projects, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Protection Pub5 lic Safety Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FLOOD RISK MAN7 AGEMENT PROJECTS. 

8 The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

9 of Engineers, is authorized to implement any flood risk 

10 management project for which, before the date of enactVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:39 Apr 17, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4353.IH H4353

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4353 IH

1 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army has trans2 mitted to Congress a letter that includes— 

3 (1) a description of the project as recommended 

4 in a report by the Chief of Engineers that concludes 

5 that the project is technically sound, environmentally 

6 acceptable, and economically justified; and 

7 (2) notification that the Office of Management 

8 and Budget has concluded that the recommendations 

9 in the report are consistent with the policy and pro10 grams of the President. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion to supplement the 

record and stay the briefing schedule, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following transcript shall be 

prepared and placed in the file of this Court in this cause within 30 

days: 

07/27/2020 – Motions Hearing (Thirteenth Judicial District Court, 

Yellowstone County, State v. Sullivan, DC 20-125)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule is 

STAYED pending filing of this transcript. Within seven (7) days after 

the transcript is filed, Appellant shall inform the Court whether he 

wishes to file an amended opening brief or to file a reply brief based on 

08/25/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0589
the existing briefing in this matter. Either an amended opening brief or 

a reply brief will be due 30 days after Appellant’s notice. The State has 

preserved its right to object to Appellant’s notice and briefing after the 

transcript is filed.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon counsel for the 

parties, the district court, and the court reporter, Claudette Henry.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 25 2022
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

The Court would like to have a short telephone conference with counsel at 9:00 A.M. ON

MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2010. Plaintiff’s counsel are requested to set up the telephone call and then

contact the Court at 415-522-3684 when all parties are present. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02058-WHA Document 61 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICE - CHAIR OF MINOR JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD : : : : : No. 384 MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

**O R D E R PER CURIA** **M:**

AND NOW , this 12 th day of June , 2015, Magisterial District Judge Richard G. King is hereby designated as Chair of the Minor Judiciary Education Board and Magisterial Dis trict Judge James K. Reiley , as Vice - Chair, commencing July 1, 2015 .
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
P. Carrosino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Biometrics, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Biometrics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: May 14, 2004

                                                /s/ Michael P. Carrosino
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael P. Carrosino
                                                Chief Financial Officer
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0307 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2012 - SW - 079 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
No: IV-16-014 June 20, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Issues Confirmatory Action Letter for Arkansas Nuclear One

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter documenting 

actions that Entergy Operations, Inc., officials have agreed to take to address performance issues at 

Arkansas Nuclear One. The plant is located in Russellville, Ark.

“The NRC has determined that when effectively implemented and independently validated by 

the NRC through inspection follow-up activities, the actions in the Confirmatory Action Letter are 

adequate to correct the significant performance deficiencies at Arkansas Nuclear One,” NRC Region IV 

Administrator Marc Dapas said.

On March 4, 2015, the NRC moved ANO into Column 4 of the agency’s Action Matrix (where 

operating plants with significant performance issues receive the second highest level of NRC oversight) 

following inspection findings of substantial safety significance stemming from a heavy equipment 

incident as well as degraded flood protection at the site.

Some of the Entergy commitments outlined in The Confirmatory Action Letter include:

 Actions to address the root and contributing causes for the findings involving the heavy 

equipment incident and degraded flood protection, including plant deficiencies, vendor 

oversight, change management, conservative decision making, and risk management.

 Identification, assessment, and correction of performance deficiencies to include improvement 

in the implementation and oversight of the corrective action program, self-assessment and 

performance monitoring, the quality of problem evaluations, and the use of operating 

experience.

 Improvements in human performance to include leadership behaviors and organizational 

capacity, as well as procedure quality, standards, and accountability.

 Improvements in equipment reliability and engineering programs to ensure that key plant 

equipment remains available, reliable, and capable of meeting the plant design and licensing 

bases, including resolving specific equipment conditions.

 Actions to improve nuclear safety culture values and behaviors to include commitment by 

leaders and individuals to emphasize safety over competing goals.

NRC plans to conduct follow-up inspections approximately quarterly to review Entergy’s 

progress toward completing the committed actions. Issuance of the Confirmatory Action Letter does 
Page | 2

not preclude the NRC from taking additional steps, including enforcement actions, for any violations of 

agency requirements that are identified in subsequent inspections.
Second Department,

June, 1976

(June 29, 1976) 

#### In the Matter of Westchester County Chapter, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners.

Application, *inter alia,*for approval pursuant to section 495 of the Judiciary Law of a proposed group legal service plan. Application dismissed. In our opinion, the specific legal services plan proposed by petitioners is not within the purview of section 495 of the Judiciary Law. We do not presently pass upon the ethical aspects of the proposed plan. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                      245,134
<SECURITIES>                                767,353
<RECEIVABLES>                               989,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                 81,133
<INVENTORY>                                 569,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,695,879
<PP&E>                                    2,865,066
<DEPRECIATION>                            1,247,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            4,841,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       827,845
<BONDS>                                     206,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      2,315
<OTHER-SE>                                3,804,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              4,841,593
<SALES>                                   4,946,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          4,946,371
<CGS>                                     2,964,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             2,964,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           23,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,153,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                136,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,289,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,289,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.61)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,005,515
<SECURITIES>                                    29,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,900
<INVENTORY>                                     43,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,708,159
<PP&E>                                         112,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,760,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,561,505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,642
<COMMON>                                       227,514
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,069,818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,760,843
<SALES>                                        526,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               526,157
<CGS>                                          374,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,383,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,143,772)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,143,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,143,772)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
From:•johan.boij@wartsila.com

Sent:•Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:04 AM

To:•pagan.jaime@epamail.epa.gov

Cc:•Tanya Parise; JSuchecki@ngelaw.com; Gerber_Gordon_R@cat.com

Subject:•EPA/EMA Meeting February 09 2009

Attachments:•Emergency%20Gensets%20%28nuclear.%20etc.%29.pdf; Microsoft

PowerPoint Geographical area fuel sulfur contents ppt Read Only.pdf;

Microsoft PowerPoint Fuel exemption areas ppt Read Only.pdf;

Microsoft PowerPoint Territories Alaska ppt Read Only.pdf

Dear Jaime,

First I want to thank you for the meeting last week.

In the meeting you asked for some information of big emergency engines and 

particulate measurement.

Please, find attached general information about nuclear emergency gensets and 

PM measurement

methods.

<<Emergency%20Gensets%20%28nuclear.%20etc.%29.pdf>> <<Microsoft PowerPoint 

Geographical

area fuel sulfur contents ppt Read Only.pdf>>

We discussed also in the meeting shortly about fuel exemption areas and 

alternative emission standards

for noncontinental areas. I have also attached some slides about these items.

<<Microsoft PowerPoint Fuel exemption areas ppt Read Only.pdf>> <<Microsoft 

PowerPoint Territories

Alaska ppt Read Only.pdf>>

Please, feel frre to contacyt me if you have questions regarding this.

Best Regards,

Johan Boij
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4340 

To restrict assistance to Egypt unless the Government of Egypt holds free 

and fair elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To restrict assistance to Egypt unless the Government of 

Egypt holds free and fair elections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON ASSISTANCE TO EGYPT. 

4 (a) RESTRICTION.—Assistance under the provisions 

5 of law described in subsection (b) may not be provided 

6 to Egypt unless the President determines and certifies to 

7 Congress that the Government of Egypt has held free and 

8 fair elections. 

9 (b) PROVISIONS OF LAW.—The provisions of law re10 ferred to in subsection (a) are— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4340 IH

1 (1) chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assist2 ance Act of 1961 (relating to the Economic Support 

3 Fund); and 

4 (2) section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act 

5 (relating to the Foreign Military Financing pro6 gram). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 17
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-19333; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-62]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Warrensburg, MO.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63063) and subsequently published a correction to the direct final rule on November 16, 2004 (69 FR 67052). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 30, 2004.

Anthony D. Roetzel

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-27223  Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[115th Congress Public Law 381]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5119]]

Public Law 115-381
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
7521 Paula Drive in Tampa, Florida, as the ``Major Andreas O'Keeffe Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 6780]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MAJOR ANDREAS O'KEEFFE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7521 Paula Drive in Tampa, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Major Andreas O'Keeffe Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Andreas O'Keeffe Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6780:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Central Zone Property Corporation, Appellant. Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation, Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 906.]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, George Paul Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February  17,  2004

                                       /s/  George  Paul  Morris
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       George  Paul  Morris
                                       Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.













                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page