MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No, 95987 

HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495 

MICHELLE KIM-SZROM, State Bar No. 252901 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

kroger@morganlewis.com 

hhoying@morganlewis.com 

mkim-szrom@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., 

HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP 

ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; 

HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.; HITACHI 

ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; 

HITACHI, LTD.; EPSON IMAGING 

DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; 

HANNSTAR DISPLAY 

CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA 

ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; 

TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION 

SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA 

CORPORATION; and TOSHIBA 

MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD., 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:10-CV-01064 SI 

MDL No. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 6
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 -2- CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 WHEREAS plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively, “Dell”) filed the 

above captioned lawsuit on March 12, 2010; 

 WHEREAS Dell filed a Notice of Related Case to In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust 

Litigation, Case No. M:07-CV-1827-SI, MDL No. 1827, on March 12, 2010, and the case was 

reassigned to the Honorable Susan Illston on March 18, 2010; 

 WHEREAS, the Defendants have agreed to waive service and the parties have reached an 

agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time within which the Defendants must 

move against, answer or otherwise respond to Dell’s Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated and the Court ordered (Dkt. 1801) 

Defendants to move against, answer or otherwise respond to Dell’s Complaint by July 6, 2010.

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Dell, on the one hand, and defendants 

Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic 

Devices (USA), Inc.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Epson Electronics 

America, Inc; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

“Defendants”) on the other hand, as follows: 

1. Defendants will have until July 16, 2010, to move against, answer or otherwise 

respond to Dell’s Complaint. 

2. Dell and Defendants agree to the following briefing schedule for any motion or 

motions to dismiss Dell’s Complaint (the “Motions”) and agree to file all motions or 

proposed orders as necessary to implement the agreed-upon schedule. To the extent 

the Court does not accept all or any part of the proposed schedule, Dell and 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 6
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 -3- CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Defendants agree to work in good faith to establish a briefing schedule for the Motions 

acceptable to all parties and the Court to replace that set forth below: 

a. Dell will have until August 24, 2010 to file any response to the Motions; 

b. Defendants will have until September 23, 2010 to file any reply brief(s) to 

the Motions; 

c. The hearing on the Motions will be noticed for October 7, 2010. 

3. Except as set forth above, all Local Rules shall remain in effect with respect to the 

briefing on the Motions. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any 

defense under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute 

a waiver of any challenge to personal jurisdiction by any Defendant. 

Dated: July 1, 2010 

/s/ Kent M. Roger 

Kent M. Roger

kroger@morganlewis.com 

Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 442-1000 

Fax: (415) 442-1001 

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, 

Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. 

/s/ John Chung 

John H. Chung (PRO HAC VICE) 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2787 

(212) 819-8200 

Attorneys for Toshiba America Electronic Components, 

Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba 

Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 3 of 6
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 -4- CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

/s/ Colin C. West

Colin C. West 

colin.west@bingham.com 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 393-2422 

(415) 393-2286 (Fax) 

Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and 

Sharp Electronics Corporation

/s/ Jacob R. Sorensen 

Jacob R. Sorensen (State Bar No. 209134) 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 983-1000 

Fax: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and

Sharp Electronics Corporation 

/s/ Stephen P. Freccero 

Stephen P. Freccero 

sfreccero@mofo.com 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Tel: (415) 268-7000 

Fax: (415) 268-7522

Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices 

Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 4 of 6
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 -5- CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

/s/ Debra D. Bernstein

Steven D. Hemminger (SBN 110665) 

steve.hemminger@alston.com 

Alston + Bird LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Tel: (650) 838-2000 

Fax: (650) 838-2001 

Michael P. Kenny, Esq. 

mike.kenny@alston.com 

Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. 

debra.bernstein@alston.com 

Rodney J. Ganske, Esq. 

rod.ganske@alston.com

Elizabeth H. Jordan, Esq. 

elizabeth.jordan@alston.com 

Matthew D. Kent, Esq. 

matthew.kent@alston.com 

Alston + Bird LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Tel: (404) 881-7000 

Fax: (404) 881-7777 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell 

Products L.P. 

FILER’S ATTESTATION

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby 

attest that John Chung, Colin West, Jacob R. Sorensen, Steven P. Freccero, and Debra 

Bernstein concur in this filing. 

/s/ Kent M. Roger

Kent M. Roger 

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi Displays, Ltd., 

Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., and 

Hitachi, Ltd. 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 5 of 6
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21806940.1 -6- CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01064 SI; MDL NO. 1827 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil 

Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:

By

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1830 Filed 07/06/10 Page 6 of 6