# Patent

## Title
MtNIP regulated plants with significantly increased size and biomass

## Abstract

A composition and method for producing plants with increased biomass and growth characteristics, and plants which flower early relative to wild-type plants. The MtNIP gene is over-expressed in plants to increase biomass, growth, and early flowering. Other genes in the NRT1/PTR family may also be over-expressed to increase biomass, growth, and early flowering.

## Background
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/554,836, filed Nov. 2, 2011, entitled “MtNIP REGULATED PLANTS WITH SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED SIZE AND BIOMASS,” having Rebecca Dickstein et al., listed as inventors and the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.


FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH
This invention was made in part during work supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation, grant #IOS-0923756. The government has certain rights in the invention.


JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENTS
Not Applicable.
SEQUENCE LISTING
Incorporated by reference in its entirety herein is a computer-readable nucleotide sequence listing submitted concurrently herewith and having the following listed sequences: SeqID No.: 1-SeqID No.: 29.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
One aspect of the present invention relates generally to creating transgenic plants, and more specifically to the expression of the MtNIP (also called MtNIP/LATD and MtLATD/NIP) gene in plants to increase the biomass and size of the plants, and to cause earlier flowering, relative to wild-type plants.
BACKGROUND
All plants require nitrogen (N) as an essential nutrient and are able to acquire N from nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4−) in the soil. Nitrate acquisition begins with its transport into root cells, accomplished by NO3− transporters. Soil NO3− concentrations can vary by five orders of magnitude and plants have evolved both high-affinity (HATS) and low-affinity (LATS) nitrogen transport systems. These systems are encoded by two distinct gene families: the phylogenetically distinct NRT1(PTR) and NRT2 families. Members of these families also participate in movement of NO3− throughout the plant and within plant cells. Proteins in the CLC transporter family also transport NO3−; these transporters are associated with cytosol to organelle NO3− movement.
The nitrogen transporter “NRT1(PTR)” is a large family of transporters, comprising 53 members in Arabidopsis, 84 members in rice, with NRT1(PTR) members known in several other species. In addition to transporting NO3− coupled to Fr movement, members of the NRT1(PTR) family have been found be a peptide transporter (PTR) capable of transporting di- or tripeptides, amino acids, dicarboxylic acids, auxin, and/or abscisic acid. One aspect of the current invention utilizes transgenic plants constitutively expressing a NRT1(PTR) proteins to increase the biomass of plants and/or to decreasing the time needed to grow plants from seed until plants are mature enough to reproduce (flowering).
The plant biomass grown for commercial use is derived from a broad range of crops. Although a majority of crops around the world are grown for food resources, one use for the non-food portions a plant biomass is a renewable source of energy. This is typically conducted by converting the plant biomass into a biofuel. Well managed biomass systems continually grow/replace biomaterial. Biomass energy systems use different conversion and processing technologies to produce solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels. The plant from which the biomass is derived impacts which processes can be used to covert it to fuel, and also the efficiency of the resulting fuel. Furthermore, different crops and processes will yield different types and volumes of biofuels.
Because biomass can be used to create biofuels, methods of developing plants with increased biomass are of great interest to agricultural researchers and corporations. Moreover, some genetically modified plants that are expressing recombinant proteins have been shown to produce higher yield of biomass. While the number of crops genetically modified to have increased resistance to herbicide, insects, and drought conditions has grown significantly over the past decades, there has not been a similar increase in plants developed specifically to increase biomass.
In the US, renewable energy contributes around 7% to the national energy consumption, and nearly half of this renewable energy is derived from biomass. Currently, forests provide around 129 m dry tons of biomass annually, while agriculture provides a further 176 m dry tons. However, according to a study by the US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Energy (DOE) these two sources could provide up to one billion dry tons (around 940,000 dry tons) of feedstock each year. On this basis biomass could supply 15% of US energy consumption by 2030. The US has a goal of generating one-third of all its liquid fuel from renewable resources by the year 2025, which could require up to 1 billion tons of biomass annually.
The Medicago truncatula (Medicago) MtNIP gene encodes a protein found in plants that is essential for symbiotic nitrogen-fixing root nodule and lateral root development (Veereshlingam et al., 2004; Yendrek et al., 2010). Plants that have defects in the MtNIP gene are able to initiate, but are unable to complete the development of, symbiotic nitrogen-fixing root nodules. These plants also have lateral roots that are incompletely formed (Veereshlingam et al., 2004). FIG. 1 shows the phenotypes observed.
Three mutant alleles of the MtNIP gene have been identified: nip-1, latd (nip-2) (Bright et al., 2005) and nip-3 (Teillet et al., 2008). Using these 3 alleles, one of the present inventors led a team of researchers to carry out a positional, map-based approach to clone the MtNIP gene (also called NIP/LATD or LATD/NIP) (Yendrek et al., 2010).
The MtNIP gene encodes a protein in the NRT1(PTR) transporter family (Yendrek et al., 2010), primarily composed of proton-coupled low affinity nitrate and di- and tri-peptide transporters (Tsay et al., 2007) (FIG. 2). The family also includes a dicarboxylate transporter (Jeong et al., 2004). Recently, the dual affinity nitrate transporter AtNRT1.1, also called CHL1 because of its ability to transport the herbicide chlorate, has been show to function as a nitrate sensor (Ho et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009) and as an auxin transporter (Krouk et al., 2010).
One aspect of the present invention provides a means of increasing the biomass of plants, as compared to wild-type plants, by over-expressing the MtNIP gene in the plants. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, this finding has implications for genetically engineering crop plants to have greater yield, and also has implications for genetically engineering plants that might be used in production of biofuels, as well as increasing yield for food, fiber and industrial applications.
Arabidopsis thaliana, a dicot, was adopted by the scientific community as a plant model, with the underlying assumption that for most physiological, developmental and genetic processes, it would behave like other plants. It is now considered the reference plant (NSF, 2002; Flavell, 2005). Knowledge gained through the use of Arabidopsis would be applicable to all plants, including crop plants, even though many crop plants are monocots. This is based on evolutionary principles that state that beneath the diversity present in plants that there are core processes and genetic mechanisms that are conserved among all plants (Flavell, 2005). Large scale genome sequencing of the much larger genomes in crop species has begun to show that these species have conserved genes with Arabidopsis, although there are frequent gene rearrangements and gene duplications when one compares Arabidopsis to a crop species (Ware and Stein, 2003; Flavell, 2005). There are numerous examples of genes being tested first in Arabidopsis, because Arabidopsis is fast, and subsequent testing in a crop species, leading to improvement of the crop species: (Bhatnagar-Mathur et al., 2008; Manavalan et al., 2009; Valente et al., 2009; Hussain et al., 2011).
Other examples of Arabidopsis genes being used to improve crop plants or Arabidopsis research paving the way for translational changes in crop plants can be found in Zhang et al (2004) (Zhang et al., 2004). The article lists specific examples of specific genes that were tested first in Arabidopsis and have been used to improve the crop plants Brassica napus, tomato, rice, wheat, strawberry, maize and tobacco. More recent examples show that ERF transcription factor genes that are involved in regulating stress responses in Arabidopsis have been transformed into crop plants rice (Gao et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010), tomato, and tobacco (Zhang and Huang, 2010), forage clovers (Abogadallah et al., 2011), and alfalfa (Jin et al., 2010), with benefits to the recipient crop plant. In these cases, the transferred gene did not always come from Arabidopsis, but the groundwork experiments were done in Arabidopsis. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, the behavior of MtNIP-transformed Arabidopsis plants will predict other plants that have MtNIP-transformed into them, or are MtNIP-transformed.
SUMMARY
Broadly, one aspect of the present invention involves creating a transgenic plant, where one or more cells of a parent plant of the transgenic plant have been transformed with a vector containing a certain gene. Another aspect of the present invention pertains to the discovery that over-expression of the MtNIP gene in a plant causes the plant to develop a significant increase in biomass and size, as well as earlier flowering, as compared to those of wild-type plants or parent plants of the transgenic plants. In one embodiment, the MtNIP gene was over-expressed in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In another embodiment, the gene has a modified gene sequence of SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:8.
In other embodiments of the invention, other genes in the NRT1(PTR) family may be over-expressed in plants to result in increased biomass, plant growth, and early flowering, as compared to wild-type plants or parent plants. The gene may be one of the 53 members of the NRT1/PTR family Arabidopsis or the 80 members in rice or other genes in the NRT1(PTR) family in other plants.
A first aspect of the current invention includes a transgenic plant having a promoter nucleotide sequence that is capable of initiating transcription of an operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence in a plant cell, wherein the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence expresses a protein in the NRT1(PTR) transporter family. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, the promoter need only be capable of initiating transcription of an operably linked heterologous gene in the plant cell, the sequence or origine of the promoter is not vital. However, in a first preferred embodiment the promoter nucleotide sequence has at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:22 or SEQ ID NO.: 29. The promoter nucleotide sequence and the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence expressing the NRT1(PTR) transporter family protein have at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:23 or SEQ ID No.: 25. In a second preferred embodiment, the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence has at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 2; or SEQ ID NO: 8. In a third preferred embodiment, the plant cell comprises an Arabidopis thaliana plant cell; a M. truncatula plant cell; or a tobacco plant cell. A quality of the transgenic plant is the biomass of the transgenic plant increases over a period of time when compared to a non-transformed plant of a same plant family phylum for the same period of time. Additionally, a seed of the transgenic plant, or parts thereof are include in the present invention.
A second aspect of the current invention includes a method for increasing the biomass of a plant. Generally, the method comprises transforming the plant with a vector capable of initiating transcription of an operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence in a plant cell, wherein the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence expresses a protein in the NRT1(PTR) transporter family. One preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention includes a step of selecting a promoter nucleotide sequence having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:22 or SeqID No.: 29 to be used for initiating the transcription of the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence. A second preferred embodiment of includes an additional step of selecting the operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence to express the NRT1(PTR) transporter protein having an amino acid comprising at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 2; or SEQ ID NO: 8. Additionally, further steps of selecting the vector comprising at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 26; SEQ ID NO: 27; or SEQ ID NO: 28; have been used. In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprises a step of selecting the plant from an Arabidopis thaliana plant family phylum; a M. truncatula plant family phylum; or a tobacco plant family phylum. When a step of comparing the biomass of the transgenic plant over a period of time is compared to a non-transformed plant of a same plant family phylum for the same period of time, the biomass of the transgenic plant is increased. Similarly, a flowering event of the transgenic plant occurs at an earlier period of time when compared to a non-transformed plant of a same plant family phylum for the same period of time. Moreover, the number of overall root nodules in the transgenic plant is increased over a period of time when compared to a non-transformed plant of a same plant family phylum for the same period of time, and a proliferation of lateral roots in the transgenic plant grown in low nitrogen conditions is increased over a period of time when compared to a non-transgenic plant of a same plant family phylum for the same period of time.
A third aspect of the current invention is a method for generating transgenic seeds for plants having an increased biomass or early flowering potential. The method comprises the steps o: (a) multiplying plant cells that contain at least one genetic transformation event of interest and which are capable of regeneration; wherein the genetic transformation event comprises incorporating a promoter nucleotide sequence that is capable of initiating transcription of an operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence expressing a protein having at least 97% identity to SEQ ID NO 8 into said plant cells; (b) selecting the plant cells that comprise at least one genetic transformation event of interest; (c) regenerating whole transgenic plants, termed primary transformants, or T0 plants, from said plant cells; (d) pollinating said primary transformants with non-transgenic pollen; (e) harvesting the seeds obtained, termed T1, which have integrated at least one transgene of interest; (f) sowing said transgenic T1 seeds and pollinating the plants which result therefrom, either by self-pollination or by free pollination; and (g) harvesting the T2 seeds. A preferred embodiment includes an additional step of carrying out post-harvest phenotypic sorting of the T2 seeds. An additional preferred step includes selecting an Arabidopis thaliana plant cell; a M. truncatula plant cell; or a tobacco plant cell for genetic transformation.
A fourth aspect of the current invention is an isolated transformation vector construct having a promoter region and an expression region having at least 95% homology with SeqID No.: 23, SeqID No.: 24, or SeqID No.: 25.
A fifth aspect of the current invention uses an isolated transformation vector construct having at least 95% homology with SeqID No.: 26, SeqID No.: 27, or SeqID No.: 28.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
FIG. 1 shows the phenotype of nip-1 and wild-type (A17) plants 15 days post inoculation (dpi) with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plants were grown in aeroponic chambers and placed on an agar support for photography. Panel A shows Wild-type plants. Bar=5.0 cm. Panel B shows, nip-1 plants. Bar=5.0 cm. Panel C shows Wild-type primary root with emergent lateral roots. Bar=1.0 mm. Panel D shows nip-1 lateral root primordium. Bar=0.25 mm. Panel E shows Wild-type nodule. Bar=0.50 mm. Panel F shows nip-1 nodules/bumps. (Note the presence of a dark pigment at the distal ends of the nodules. Bar=0.50 mm.
FIG. 2 Panel A shows MtNIP in the NRT1(PTR) transporter family. The phylogeny was created with MtNIP's deduced amino acid sequence with the 53 members of the Arabidopsis NRT1(PTR) family, by the neighbor joining method. The white arrow points to MtNIP; black arrow points to CHL(NRT1.1). Proteins identified by a capital (R) have been shown to encode nitrate transporters; those identified by a capital (G) encode di- and tri-peptide transporters. The clades are numbered as in Tsay et al. 2007. MtNIP protein belongs to a Glade that includes nitrate transporters. Panel B shows summarizes NIP gene and known mutants nip-1, latd (nip-2), and nip-3.
FIG. 3 shows nitrate uptake in Xenopus oocytes expressing MtNIP. Xenopus oocytes were microinjected with MtNIP mRNA or water as a negative control, incubated for 3 days, then incubated for the indicated times in media containing 0.25 mM (250 μM) or 5 mM nitrate at the indicated pH. The oocytes were lysed and nitrate was determined using a spectrophotometric assay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Mich.). The results show that MtNIP-expressing oocytes take up nitrate at low concentrations, in a pH-dependent manner, consistent with MtNIP being a high-affinity, proton-coupled nitrate transporter.
FIG. 4 shows nitrate uptake in Xenopus oocytes expressing MtNIP or mutant NIP mRNAs. Xenopus oocytes were microinjected with MtNIP mRNA, mutant MtNIP mRNA or water as a negative control, incubated for 3 days, then incubated for the indicated times in media containing 0.25 mM or 5 mM nitrate, at pH 5.5, as in FIG. 2. Nitrate was assayed as in FIG. 2. The results show that while neither nip-1 nor nip-2 (latd) mutant proteins are capable of transporting nitrate, the nip-3 mutant protein transports nitrate as well as wild-type NIP. Since the nip-3 mutant has a nodulation and lateral root phenotype, NIP protein has another function besides nitrate transport.
FIG. 5 shows that MtNIP complements the Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant for chlorate sensitivity. Arabidodpsis chl1-5 plants were transformed with a construct containing MtNIP cDNA under the control of the Arabidopsis EF1 α promoter, pAtEF1 α-MtNIP or a positive control construct containing the Arabidopsis AtNRT1.1 gene under the same promoter, pAtEF1 α-AtNRT1.1. The plants were treated with chlorate as described in Tsay et al. 1993. The MtNIP gene was able to confer chlorate sensitivity on chl1-5 plants, similar to the AtNRT1.1 gene.
FIG. 6 shows the phenotype of pAtEF1α-MtNIP expressing plants, with controls. The growth of Arabidopsis plants transformed pAtEF1α-MtNIP and control plants not transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP at 8 weeks is shown. Plants were grown on Sunshine mix (Sun Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, Wash.) at 22 C on 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle. They were fertilized 3 weeks post-germination with Peter's 20/20/20 (Scotts, Charleston, S.C.). Plants labeled #1 and #2 represent independently transformed lines. It is readily apparent that pAtEF1α-MtNIP expression yields plants with greater biomass that flower earlier than the controls.
FIG. 7 shows Nitrate uptake in Medicago. Wild-type A17, Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 plants were placed in solutions containing 250 μM (panel A) or 5 mM (panel B) nitrate. Nitrate uptake was monitored by its uptake from the media at 2 hr intervals. Data are plotted for one biological replicate plus or minus the standard error of the mean.
FIG. 8 shows Lateral root lengths of Medicago plants grown in different conditions. Wild-type A17 (solid bars), Mtnip-1 (white bars) and Mtnip-3 (horizontally striped bars) were grown in liquid BNM media with no added NO3− (panel A), with 250 μM KNO3 (panel B) or with 5 mM KNO3 (panel C), with the media changed every other day. Lateral root lengths were measured after 2 weeks. Data are shown for one biological replicate plus or minus the standard error of the mean, n=5. Replicates gave similar results. Asterisks mark lateral root lengths from plants grown at 250 μM KNO3 and 5 mM KNO3 that are significantly different from the same genotype grown at 0 mM KNO3, using Student's t-test at p<0.05.
FIG. 9 shows Nitrate uptake in Xenopus oocytes expressing MtNIP/LATD. Oocytes were microinjected with MtNIP/LATD mRNA (black bars, +) or water as a negative control (white bars, −), incubated for 3 days, then placed for the indicated times in media containing 250 μM or 5 mM NO3− at pH 5.5 or 7.4. The oocytes were rinsed, lysed and assayed for NO3− uptake. Panels A, C, 250 μM NO3−. Panels B, D, 5 mM NO3−. Panels A, B, pH=5.5. Panels C, D, pH=7.4. Data are shown for one biological replicate plus or minus the standard deviation; n=3-5 batches of 4-6 oocytes per batch. Asterisks mark NO3− uptake significantly different from the negative control, using Student's t-test at p<0.05. Similar results were obtained in more than 5 repetitions of the experiment. Panel E, Michaelis-Menten plot of oocyte NO3− uptake. MtNIP/LATD-injected oocytes (squares) or water-injected oocytes (circles) as control were incubated for 3 h in 50 μM to 10 mM NO3− in batches of 5, and assayed for NO3− uptake. Results for two biological replicates are indicated by the black and gray symbols, with bars showing the standard deviations. All NO3− uptake was significantly different from the negative control, using Student's t-test at p<0.05, except for that at 50 μM. Panel F, Hanes-Woolf plot of averaged NO3− uptake data, in MtNIP/LATD-injected oocytes minus water-injected oocytes, presented in panel E.
FIG. 10 shows Nitrate uptake in Xenopus oocytes expressing MtNIP/LATD or mutant Mtnip/latd mRNAs. Oocytes were microinjected with MtNIP/LATD mRNA, mutant mRNA or water as a negative control, incubated for 3 days, then placed for the indicated times in media containing 5 mM or 250 μM nitrate, at pH 5.5, and assayed for nitrate uptake. Panel A, 5 mM nitrate. Panel B, 250 μM nitrate. Panel C. 5 mM nitrate. Oocytes expressing wild-type MtNIP/LATD (black bars), Mtnip-1 (white bars), Mtnip-3 (horizontally striped bars), Mtlatd (hatched bars) or water as a negative control (diagonal striped bars) are shown. Data are shown for one biological replicate plus or minus the standard deviation; n=3-5 batches of 4-6 oocytes per batch. Asterisks mark nitrate uptake that is significantly different from the negative control, using Student's t-test at p<0.05. Similar results were obtained in more than 3 repetitions of the experiment.
FIG. 11 shows MtNIP/LATD complements the chlorate insensitivity phenotype of the Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant. Arabidodpsis chl1-5 plants were transformed with a construct containing MtNIP/LATD cDNA under the control of the Arabidopsis EF1 αpromoter, pAtEF1 α-MtNIP/LATD or a positive control construct containing the Arabidopsis AtNRT1.1 gene under the same promoter, pAtEF1 α-AtNRT1.1. The plants were treated with chlorate, a NO3− analog that can be converted to toxic chlorite after uptake, as described in Tsay et al. 1993. Panel A: Arabidopsis Col-0 plants. Panel B: Arabidopsis chl1-5 plants. Panel C: Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-AtNRT.1.1 plants. Panel D: Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD plants. Bars=1⁄4 inch. The MtNIP/LATD gene was able to confer chlorate sensitivity on Arabidopsis chl1-5 plants, similar to the AtNRT1.1 gene.
FIG. 12 shows Arabidopsis NRT1.1 partially complements the Medicago nip-1 mutant for its root architecture phenotype. Medicago nip-1 and control wild-type composite plants transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 or empty pCAMBIA2301 vector, as a control, were grown in aeroponic chambers, inoculated with S. meliloti containing a constitutive lacZ gene, and grown in 16/8 h light/dark at 22 C. At 15 days post-inoculation, root architecture characteristics were evaluated. Panels A, B, C, D show the appearance of the roots. Bars=10 mm. A: A17, empty vector. B: A17, pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. C: nip-1, empty vector. D. nip-1, pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. Panels E-G: Quantitation of primary root length (E), lateral root number (F), and lateral root length (G); averaged values with the standard deviation are plotted; n=5. Asterisks mark root attributes that are significantly different from the negative control, using Student's t-test at p<0.01. Solid bars: A17, empty vector. Vertically striped bars; A17, pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. diagonal striped bars: Mtnip-1, empty vector. White bars. Mtnip-1, pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1.
FIG. 13 shows Arabidopsis NRT1.1 does not complement the Medicago nip-1 nodule phenotype. Medicago nip-1 and control wild-type composite plants transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1, empty vector pCAMBIA2301 as negative control, or pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD were grown in as in FIG. 11, with S. meliloti containing a constitutive lacZ gene. At 15 days post-inoculation, nodule characteristics were evaluated after staining with X-Gal for localization of rhizobia, which stain blue and are shown as black spots. Panel A, A17 transformed with empty vector. Panel B, A17 transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. Panel C. A17 transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD. Panel D, Mtnip-1 transformed with empty vector. Panel E, Mtnip-1 transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. Panel F, Mtnip-1 transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD. Bars=200 μm.
FIG. 14 shows a table having MtNIP/LATD-expressing oocytes do not take up histidine. For each replicate, eight oocytes, injected with either MtNIP/LATD in vitro-transcribed RNA or with water as a control, were incubated with uniformly labeled 13C-histidine. Supernatants from lysed oocytes were derivatized with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate. Histidine quantitation was accomplished using ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. See Materials and Methods for experimental details.
FIG. 15 shows a table of Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used in this invention.
FIG. 16 shows a Comparison of nitrate uptake in oocytes expressing MtNIP/LATD versus AtNRT1.1. Oocytes were microinjected with MtNIP/LATD mRNA (black bars), AtNRT1.1 mRNA (horizontally striped bars) or water as a negative control (gray bars), incubated for 2 days, then placed in media containing 250 μM or 5 mM NO3− at pH 5.5. The oocytes were rinsed, lysed and assayed for NO3− uptake. Panel A, 250 μM NO3−. Panel B. 5 mM NO3−. Data are shown for one biological replicate plus or minus the standard deviation; n=5 batches of 4-6 oocytes per batch. Asterisks mark NO3− uptake significantly different from the negative control, using Student's t-test at p<0.05. Similar results were obtained in two repetitions of the experiment.
FIG. 17 shows MtNIP/LATD complements the chlorate insensitivity phenotype of the Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant. Arabidopsis chl1-5 plants were transformed with a construct containing MtNIP/LATD cDNA under the control of the Arabidopsis ET1αpromoter, pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD or a positive control construct containing the Arabidopsis AtNRT1.1 gene under the same promoter, pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1. All plants were treated with chlorate as described in Tsay et al. 1993. Plants in panels A-D were handled together as were plants in panels E-H. A, Arabidopsis Col-0. B, Arabidopsis chl1-5. C, Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 D, Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD, transformant 1. E, Arabidopsis Col-0. F, Arabidopsis chl-5. G, Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD-1. H, Arabidopsis chl1-5/pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD transformant 2. The MtNIP/LATD gene was able to confer chlorate sensitivity on Arabidopsis chl1-5 plants, similar to the AtNRT1.1 gene.
FIG. 18 shows AgDCAT1 does not complement the Mtnip-1 mutant. Medicago nip-1 and control A17 wild-type composite plants transformed with pMtNIP/LATD-MtNIP/LATD, pMtNIP/LATD-AgDCAT1, or empty vector pCAMBIA as negative control, were grown as in FIG. 5. Panels A and D, Mtnip-1 transformed with empty vector. Panels B and E, Mtnip-1 transformed with pMtNIP/LATD-MtNIP/LATD. Panels C and F, Mtnip-1 transformed with pMtNIP/LATD-AgDCAT1. Panels A-C, roots; bars=5 mm. Panels D-F, nodules; blue but represented as a black color indicates rhizobia stained with X-Gal; bars=200 μm. Panel G. Quantitation of lateral root length. Averaged values with the standard deviation are plotted; n=5. Black bars: A17, empty vector. Vertical striped bars: A17, pMtNIP/LATD-AgDCAT1. Horizontal-stripped bars: Mtnip-1, pMtNIP/LATD-MtNIP/LATD. Diagonal-stripped bars, Mtnip-1, empty vector. White bars: Mtnip-1, pMtNIP/LATD-AgDCAT1.
FIG. 19 shows a Table of Nodulation in the absence and presence of N sources. In each experiment, wild-type A17 and Mtnip-1 plants were grown in the same aeroponic chamber in the given N regime, as described in Materials and Methods. For each experiment, 7 to 11 plants of each genotype were evaluated. Nodules were counted at 15 days post inoculation (dpi). Data are presented as the mean number of nodules per plant plus or minus the standard error of the mean.
FIG. 20 shows a Table of Fresh weight and chlorophyll content of chlorate treated Arabidopsis plants. Plants were grown in vermiculite: perlite (1:1) and irrigated with media containing 5 mM NO3− for 5-7 days. Plants were then irrigated with ClO3−-containing media without NO3− for 3 days, and subsequently with media lacking both ClO3− and NO3−. Fresh weight and chlorophyll content were obtained from plants 7-10 days after ClO3− treatment. Each data point represents 7-9 plants. Two independent replicates gave similar results.
FIG. 21 shows a comparison of wild-type non-transformed Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD using constitutive AtEF1αPromoter.
FIG. 22 shows a comparison of an Arabidopsis plant constitutively expressing MtNIP-3 and another Arabidopsis plant constitutively expressing MtNIP-1 using constitutive AtEF1αPromoter.
FIG. 23 Panel A shows a comparison of an Arabidopsis plant constitutively expressing AtNRT1.1 using constitutive AtEF1αPromoter, which causes slightly larger plants and several of the plants to flower earlier. Panel B shows how two plants constitutively expression gMtNIP/LATD are larger and flowering earlier than the plant on the right expressing an unrelated gene GUS.
FIG. 24 shows a comparison of M. Truncatula plants transformed with GUS and M. Truncatula constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD using constitutive AtEF1αPromoter.
FIG. 25 shows a comparison of tobacco plants transformed with GUS and tobacco plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD.
FIG. 26 shows an illustration of locations of nodules in the M. Truncatula plant.
FIG. 27 shows a comparison of total nodule number per plant in wild-type non-transformed M. Truncatula and M. Truncatula constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD grown in different concentrations of KNO3.
FIG. 28 shows a comparison of average number of nodules located in the primary zone in wild-type non-transformed M. Truncatula and M. Truncatula constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD grown in different concentrations of KNO3.
FIG. 29 shows a comparison of average number of nodules located in the secondary zone in wild-type non-transformed M. Truncatula and M. Truncatula constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD grown in different concentrations of KNO3.
FIG. 30 shows a comparison of average number of nodules located in the lateral roots in wild-type non-transformed M. Truncatula and M. Truncatula constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD grown in different concentrations of KNO3 
FIG. 31 shows comparison of average number of nodules located in the lateral roots of MtNIP/LATD overexpressing lines and in wild-type non-transformed M. Truncatula grown in different concentrations of KNO3.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Broadly, one aspect of the present invention involves creating a transgenic plant, where one or more cells of a parent plant of the transgenic plant have been transformed with a vector containing a certain gene. Generally, it is believed that the transformation is almost complete. A further aspect of the present invention includes the discovery that over-expression of the MtNIP gene in a plant causes the plant to develop a significant increase in biomass. In one embodiment, the MtNIP gene was over-expressed in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). The transgenic plants have modified growth characteristics, such as size, biomass, and flowering time.
In another aspect of the present invention, it is shown that MtNIP protein is a high affinity proton coupled nitrate transporter, and also functions to increase plant biomass as well as size and to promote early flowering, as compared to those of wild-type plants or parent plants of the transgenic plants.
DEFINITIONS
The Medicago truncatula (Medicago) MtNIP gene (also called NIP/LATD or LATD/NIP) encodes a protein in the NRT1(PTR) transporter family found in plants that is essential for symbiotic nitrogen-fixing root nodule and lateral root development. Plants that have defects in the MtNIP gene are able to initiate, but are unable to complete the development of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing root nodules. The M. truncatula NIP/LATD gene sequence (SEQ ID No.: 1) (gi|262181250|gb|GQ401665.1| Medicago truncatula LATD/NIP cDNA, complete cds) is as follows:








ATGGAGTACACAAACAGTGATGATGCTACAAATGAAAAACTCATTGAAAATGGCAGCTCTTCATCATCTT



 


CTCAACCGAGAAAGGGTGGTTTAAGAACCATGCCCTTTATCATAGTGAATGAGTGTCTTGAGAAAGTGGC


 


AAGTTATGGAATAATGCCAAACATGATATTATACTTGAGGGATGATTATAACATGCCTATTGCTAAGGCT


 


AGTTATGTTCTTTCTACTTGGTCTGCTATGTCCAATGTTTTGTCCATCTTTGGTGCTTTTCTCTCTGATT


 


CTTACTTGGGTCGCTTCAATGTCATCACTATTGGCTCCTTTTCTAGCCTTCTTGGTTTAACCGTTTTGTG


 


GTTAACTGCCATGATCCCGGTGCTAAAACCTACCTGTGCATCACTCTTTGAAATCTGTAATTCTGCTACT


 


TCATCCCAACAAGCAGTTCTGTTCCTTTCCTTAGGATTAATTTCAATTGGAGCTGGTTGTGTTAGACCTT


 


GTTCCATAGCCTTTGGAGCAGAGCAATTGACTATTAAGGGAAATTCTGGTGATGGGAATGGCAGGATCTT


 


GGATAGTTACTTTAATTGGTATTATACCTCAATTTCAGTTTCAACCATTATCGCGTTGAGTGTGATTGCT


 


TACATTCAAGAAAACCTTGGATGGAAAATTGGGTTTGGAGTACCTGCTGTGCTAATGCTCGTATCGGTCA


 


TCAGTTTCATTATTGGTTCACCGTTATATGTCAAAGTGAAGCCAAGTGAAAGCTTACTCACTAATTTTGC


 


AAGAGTAGTTGTGGTGGCAACCAAGAACAGAAAACTTAGTCTTCCTGATGACGACTCTGATCGTTACTGT


 


CAAGGTCATGATTCAAAGCTGAAGGTTCCTACCGATAGCCTTAGGTTTTTGAACAAAGCTTGCGTAATAA


 


GAAATCCTGAGACAGATCTTAATCGAGATGGGTCAATTTCAAATCCGTGGAACCTATGCACAATAGAACA


 


GGTGGAGTCACTGAAGTCTTTGCTCAGAGTCATTCCTATGTGGTCAACGGGAATCTTTATGATGGCGACT


 


CAGAGTTCATTTTCTACTCTTCAAGCCAAAACTTTGAACCGAACGTTATTCGGCAATTTCAATTTTCCTG


 


CAGGATCGTTCAATCTTATCTTGATATTCACCTTAACAATAGTAATTCCTTTATATGACCGTGTAGGAGT


 


ACCTCTACTAGCTAAATACGCAGGCCGGCCTAGAGGATTCAGTTTTAAAGTCCGCATCGGGATAGGAATG


 


CTGTTTGCAATTGTAGCTAAAGCAGTAGCAGCTATTGTTGAAACGGTGAGACGAAATGCAGCGATTGAAC


 


AAGGGTTTGAGGACCAACCTAATGCTGAAATTAACATGTCGGCTTTATGGCTTGCTCCAGAGTTTATTTT


 


GTTTGGATTCGCCGAAGCTTTCACACCAGTTGGACTGGTTGAGTTTTTCTACTGTTTTTTCCCTAAGAGT


 


ATGTCTAGTTTTGCAATGGCTATGTTCACATTGGGACTAGCTTGTTCTGACGTAGTTTCAGGTGTGCTTG


 


TGAGCATTGTGGACACGGTCACTAGTATTGGAGGGAATGAGAGCTGGTTATCGACTAACATCAATAGGGG


 


ACATTTGAATTACTACTACGGGCTACTCACTTTCTTAGGCATTCTTAACTACTTCTATTATCTTGTTATT


 


TGTTGGGCTTATGGACCCATACAGGGAGAGAAACATGAAGATTCGGCCAGAAAGAAAGACGATAAATTTG


 


GTTACAGGGAGTTGCCTACTTCATAG






The MtNIP gene encodes a protein having the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID No.2):









MetGluTyrThrAsnSerAspAspAlaThrAsnGluLysLeuIleGluAsnGlySerSer



 


SerSerSerSerGlnProArgLysGlyGlyLeuArgThrMetProPheIleIleValAsn


 


GluCysLeuGluLysValAlaSerTyrGlyIleMetProAsnMetIleLeuTyrLeuArg


 


AspAspTyrAsnMetProIleAlaLysAlaSerTyrValLeuSerThrTrpSerAlaMet


 


SerAsnValLeuSerIlePheGlyAlaPheLeuSerAspSerTyrLeuGlyArgPheAsn


 


ValIleThrIleGlySerPheSerSerLeuLeuGlyLeuThrValLeuTrpLeuThrAla


 


MetIleProValLeuLysProThrCysAlaSerLeuPheGluIleCysAsnSerAlaThr


 


SerSerGlnGlnAlaValLeuPheLeuSerLeuGlyLeuIleSerIleGlyAlaGlyCys


 


ValArgProCysSerIleAlaPheGlyAlaGluGlnLeuThrIleLysGlyAsnSerGly


 


AspGlyAsnGlyArgIleLeuAspSerTyrPheAsnTrpTyrTyrThrSerIleSerVal


 


SerThrIleIleAlaLeuSerValIleAlaTyrIleGlnGluAsnLeuGlyTrpLysIle


 


GlyPheGlyValProAlaValLeuMetLeuValSerValIleSerPheIleIleGlySer


 


ProLeuTyrValLysValLysProSerGluSerLeuLeuThrAsnPheAlaArgValVal


 


ValValAlaThrLysAsnArgLysLeuSerLeuProAspHisAspSerAspArgTyrCys


 


GlnGlyHisAspSerLysLeuLysValProThrAspSerLeuArgPheLeuAsnLysAla


 


CysValIleArgAsnProGluThrAspLeuAsnArgAspGlySerIleSerAsnProTrp


 


AsnLeuCysThrIleGluGlnValGluSerLeuLysSerLeuLeuArgValIleProMet


 


TrpSerThrGlyIlePheMetMetAlaThrGlnSerSerPheSerThrLeuGlnAlaLys


 


ThrLeuAsnArgThrLeuPheGlyAsnPheAsnPheProAlaGlySerPheAspLeuIle


 


LeuIlePheThrLeuThrIleValIleProLeuTyrAspArgValGlyValProLeuLeu


 


AlaLysTyrAlaGlyArgProArgGlyPheSerPheLysValArgIleGlyIleGlyMet


 


LeuPheAlaIleValAlaLysAlaValAlaAlaIleValGluThrValArgArgAsnAla


 


AlaIleGluGlnGlyPheGluAspGlnProAsnAlaGluIleAsnMetSerAlaLeuTrp


 


LeuAlaProGluPheIleLeuPheGlyPheAlaGluAlaPheThrProValGlyLeuVal


 


GluPhePheTyrCysPhePheProLysSerMetSerSerPheAlaMetAlaMetPheThr


 


LeuGlyLeuAlaCysSerAspValValSerGlyValLeuValSerIleValAspThrVal


 


ThrSerIleGlyGlyAsnGluSerTrpLeuSerThrAsnIleAsnArgGlyHisLeuAsn


 


TyrTyrTyrGlyLeuLeuThrPheLeuGlyIleLeuAsnTyrPheTyrTyrLeuValIle


 


CysTrpAlaTyrGlyProIleGlnGlyGluLysHisGluAspSerAlaArgLysLysAsp


 


AspLysPheGlyTyrArgGluLeuProThrSer






The nip-1 allele of MtNIP refers to a mutant M. truncatula nip-1 mutant gene sequence (mutation in bold italics). Medicago truncatula nip-1 cDNA has the following (SEQ ID No.3):








ATGGAGTACACAAACAGTGATGATGCTACAAATGAAAAACTCATTGAAAATGGCAGCTCTTCATCATCTT



 


CTCAACCCAGAAAGGGTGGTTTAAGAACCATGCCCTTTATCATAGTGAATGAGTGTCTTGAGAAAGTGGC


 


AAGTTATGGAATAATGCCAAACATGATATTATACTTGAGGGATGATTATAACATGCCTATTGCTAAGGCT


 


AGTTATGTTCTTTCTACTTGGTCTGCTATGTCCAATGTTTTGTCCATCTTTGGTGCTTTTCTCTCTGATT


 


CTTACTTGGGTCGCTTCAATGTCATCACTATTGGCTCCTTTTCTAGCCTTCTTGGTTTAACCGTTTTGTG


 


GTTAACTGCCATGATCCCGGTGCTAAAACCTACCTGTGCATCACTCTTTGAAATCTGTAATTCTGCTACT


 


TCATCCCAACAAGCAGTTCTGTTCCTTTCCTTAGGATTAATTTCAATTGGAGCTGGTTGTGTTAGACCTT


 


GTTCCATAGCCTTTGGAGCAGAGCAATTGACTATTAAGGGAAATTCTGGTGATGGGAATGGCAGGATCTT


 


GGATAGTTACTTTAATTGGTATTATACCTCAATTTCAGTTTCAACCATTATCGCGTTGAGTGTGATTGCT


 


TACATTCAAGAAAACCTTGGATGGAAAATTGGGTTTGGAGTACCTGCTGTGCTAATGCTCGTATCGGTCA


 


TCAGTTTCATTATTGGTTCACCGTTATATGTCAAAGTGAAGCCAAGTGAAAGCTTACTCACTAATTTTGC


 


AAGAGTAGTTGTGGTGGCAACCAAGAACAGAAAACTTAGTCTTCCTGATCACGACTCTGATCGTTACTGT


 


CAAGGTCATGATTCAAAGCTGAAGGTTCCTACCGATAGCCTTAGGTTTTTGAACAAAGCTTGCGTAATAA


 


GAAATCCTGAGACAGATCTTAATCGAGATGGGTCAATTTCAAATCCGTGGAACCTATGCACAATAGAACA


 


GGTGGAGTCACTGAAGTCTTTGCTCAGAGTCATTCCTATGTGGTCAACGGGAATCTTTATGATGGCGACT


 


CAGAGTTCATTTTCTACTCTTCAAGCCAAAACTTTGAACCGAACGTTATTCGGCAATTTCAATTTTCCTG


 


CAGGATCGTTCAATCTTATCTTGATATTCACCTTAACAATAGTAATTCCTTTATATGACCGTGTAGGAGT


 


ACCTCTACTAGCTAAATACGCAGGCCGGCCTAGAGGATTCAGTTTTAAAGTCCGCATCGGGATAGGAATG


 


CTGTTTGCAATTGTAGCTAAAGCAGTAGCAGCTATTGTTGAAACGGTGAGACGAAATGCAGCGATTGAAC


 


AAGGGTTTGAGGACCAACCTAATGCTGAAATTAACATGTCGGCTTTATGGCTTGCTCCAGAGTTTATTTT


 


GTTTGGATTCGCCGAAGCTTTCACACCAGTTGGACTGGTTGAGTTTTTCTACTGTTTTTTCCCTAAGAGT


 


ATGTCTAGTTTTGCAATGG TATGTTCACATTGGGACTAGCTTGTTCTGACGTAGTTTCAGGTGTGCTTG


 


TGAGCATTGTGGACACGGTCACTAGTATTGGAGGGAATGAGAGCTGGTTATCGACTAACATCAATAGGGG


 


ACATTTGAATTACTACTACGGGCTACTCACTTTCTTAGGCATTCTTAACTACTTCTATTATCTTGTTATT


 


TGTTGGGCTTATGGACCCATACAGGGAGAGAAACATGAAGATTCGGCCAGAAAGAAAGACGATAAATTTG


 


GTTACAGGGAGTTGCCTACTTCATAG






Medicago truncatula nip-1 Amino acid Sequence (SEQ ID No.: 4)









MetGluTyrThrAsnSerAspAspAlaThrAsnGluLysLeuIleGluAsnGlySerSer



 


SerSerSerSerGlnProArgLysGlyGlyLeuArgThrMetProPheIleIleValAsn


 


GluCysLeuGluLysValAlaSerTyrGlyIleMetProAsnMetIleLeuTyrLeuArg


 


AspAspTyrAsnMetProIleAlaLysAlaSerTyrValLeuSerThrTrpSerAlaMet


 


SerAsnValLeuSerIlePheGlyAlaPheLeuSerAspSerTyrLeuGlyArgPheAsn


 


ValIleThrIleGlySerPheSerSerLeuLeuGlyLeuThrValLeuTrpLeuThrAla


 


MetIleProValLeuLysProThrCysAlaSerLeuPheGluIleCysAsnSerAlaThr


 


SerSerGlnGlnAlaValLeuPheLeuSerLeuGlyLeuIleSerIleGlyAlaGlyCys


 


ValArgProCysSerIleAlaPheGlyAlaGluGlnLeuThrIleLysGlyAsnSerGly


 


AspGlyAsnGlyArgIleLeuAspSerTyrPheAsnTrpTyrTyrThrSerIleSerVal


 


SerThrIleIleAlaLeuSerValIleAlaTyrIleGlnGluAsnLeuGlyTrpLysIle


 


GlyPheGlyValProAlaValLeuMetLeuValSerValIleSerPheIleIleGlySer


 


ProLeuTyrValLysValLysProSerGluSerLeuLeuThrAsnPheAlaArgValVal


 


ValValAlaThrLysAsnArgLysLeuSerLeuProAspHisAspSerAspArgTyrCys


 


GlnGlyHisAspSerLysLeuLysValProThrAspSerLeuArgPheLeuAsnLysAla


 


CysValIleArgAsnProGluThrAspLeuAsnArgAspGlySerIleSerAsnProTrp


 


AsnLeuCysThrIleGluGlnValGluSerLeuLysSerLeuLeuArgValIleProMet


 


TrpSerThrGlyIlePheMetMetAlaThrGlnSerSerPheSerThrLeuGlnAlaLys


 


ThrLeuAsnArgThrLeuPheGlyAsnPheAsnPheProAlaGlySerPheAsnLeuIle


 


LeuIlePheThrLeuThrIleValIleProLeuTyrAspArgValGlyValProLeuLeu


 


AlaLysTyrAlaGlyArgProArgGlyPheSerPheLysValArgIleGlyIleGlyMet


 


LeuPheAlaIleValAlaLysAlaValAlaAlaIleValGluThrValArgArgAsnAla


 


AlaIleGluGlnGlyPheGluAspGlnProAsnAlaGluIleAsnMetSerAlaLeuTrp


 


LeuAlaProGluPheIleLeuPheGlyPheAlaGluAlaPheThrProValGlyLeuVal


 


GluPhePheTyrCysPhePheProLysSerMetSerSerPheAlaMetValMetPheThr


 


LeuGlyLeuAlaCysSerAspValValSerGlyValLeuValSerIleValAspThrVal


 


ThrSerIleGlyGlyAsnGluSerTrpLeuSerThrAsnIleAsnArgGlyHisLeuAsn


 


TyrTyrTyrGlyLeuLeuThrPheLeuGlyIleLeuAsnTyrPheTyrTyrLeuValIle


 


CysTrpAlaTyrGlyProIleGlnGlyGluLysHisGluAspSerAlaArgLysLysAsp


 


AspLysPheGlyTyrArgGluLeuProThrSer






The laid (nip-2) allele of MtNIP refers to a M. truncatula laid (nip-2) mutant gene sequence (mutation in bold italics) cDNA (Seq ID No.: 5):








ATGGAGTACACAAACAGTGATGATGCTACAAATGAAAAACTCATTGAAAATGGCAGCTCTTCATCATCTT



 


CTCAACCCAGAAAGGGTGGTTTAAGAACCATGCCCTTTATCATAGTGAATGAGTGTCTTGAGAAAGTGGC


 


AAGTTATGGAATAATGCCAAACATGATATTATACTTGAGGGATGATTATAACATGCCTATTGCTAAGGCT


 


AGTTATGTTCTTTCTACTTGGTCTGCTATGTCCAATGTTTTGTCCATCTTTGGTGCTTTTCTCTCTGATT


 


CTTACTTGGGTCGCTTCAATGTCATCACTATTGGCTCCTTTTCTAGCCTTCTTGGTTTAACCGTTTTGTG


 


GTTAACTGCCATGATCCCGGTGCTAAAACCTACCTGTGCATCACTCTTTGAAATCTGTAATTCTGCTACT


 


TCATCCCAACAAGCAGTTCTGTTCCTTTCCTTAGGATTAATTTCAATTGGAGCTGGTTGTGTTAGACCTT


 


GTTCCATAGCCTTTGGAGCAGAGCAATTGACTATTAAGGGAAATTCTGGTGATGGGAATGGCAGGATCTT


 


GGATAGTTACTTTAATTGGTATTATACCTCAATTTCAGTTTCAACCATTATCGCGTTGAGTGTGATTGCT


 


TACATTCAAGAAAACCTTGGATGGAAAATTGGGTTTGGAGTACCTGCTGTGCTAATGCTCGTATCGGTCA


 


TCAGTTTCATTATTGGTTCACCGTTATATGTCAAAGTGAAGCCAAGTGAAAGCTTACTCACTAATTTTGC


 


AAGAGTAGTTGTGGTGGCAACCAAGAACAGAAAACTTAGTCTTCCTGATCACGACTCTGATCGTTACTGT


 


CAAGGTCATGATTCAAAGCTGAAGGTTCCTACCGATAGCCTTAGGTTTTTGAACAAAGCTTGCGTAATAA


 


GAAATCCTGAGACAGATCTTAATCGAGATGGGTCAATTTCAAATCCGTGGAACCTATGCACAATAGAACA


 


GGTGGAGTCACTGAAGTCTTTGCTCAGAGTCATTCCTATGTG TCAACGGGAATCTTTATGATGGCGACT


 


CAGAGTTCATTTTCTACTCTTCAAGCCAAAACTTTGAACCGAACGTTATTCGGCAATTTCAATTTTCCTG


 


CAGGATCGTTCAATCTTATCTTGATATTCACCTTAACAATAGTAATTCCTTTATATGACCGTGTAGGAGT


 


ACCTCTACTAGCTAAATACGCAGGCCGGCCTAGAGGATTCAGTTTTAAAGTCCGCATCGGGATAGGAATG


 


CTGTTTGCAATTGTAGCTAAAGCAGTAGCAGCTATTGTTGAAACGGTGAGACGAAATGCAGCGATTGAAC


 


AAGGGTTTGAGGACCAACCTAATGCTGAAATTAACATGTCGGCTTTATGGCTTGCTCCAGAGTTTATTTT


 


GTTTGGATTCGCCGAAGCTTTCACACCAGTTGGACTGGTTGAGTTTTTCTACTGTTTTTTCCCTAAGAGT


 


ATGTCTAGTTTTGCAATGGCTATGTTCACATTGGGACTAGCTTGTTCTGACGTAGTTTCAGGTGTGCTTG


 


TGAGCATTGTGGACACGGTCACTAGTATTGGAGGGAATGAGAGCTGGTTATCGACTAACATCAATAGGGG


 


ACATTTGAATTACTACTACGGGCTACTCACTTTCTTAGGCATTCTTAACTACTTCTATTATCTTGTTATT


 


TGTTGGGCTTATGGACCCATACAGGGAGAGAAACATGAAGATTCGGCCAGAAAGAAAGACGATAAATTTG


 


GTTACAGGGAGTTGCCTACTTCATAG






The translated amino acid sequence for M. truncatula latd (nip-2) mutant gene sequence leads to a stop codon as indicated below (SEQ ID NO.: 6):









MetGluTyrThrAsnSerAspAspAlaThrAsnGluLysLeuIleGluAsnGlySerSer



 


SerSerSerSerGlnProArgLysGlyGlyLeuArgThrMetProPheIleIleValAsn


 


GluCysLeuGluLysValAlaSerTyrGlyIleMetProAsnMetIleLeuTyrLeuArg


 


AspAspTyrAsnMetProIleAlaLysAlaSerTyrValLeuSerThrTrpSerAlaMet


 


SerAsnValLeuSerIlePheGlyAlaPheLeuSerAspSerTyrLeuGlyArgPheAsn


 


ValIleThrIleGlySerPheSerSerLeuLeuGlyLeuThrValLeuTrpLeuThrAla


 


MetIleProValLeuLysProThrCysAlaSerLeuPheGluIleCysAsnSerAlaThr


 


SerSerGlnGlnAlaValLeuPheLeuSerLeuGlyLeuIleSerIleGlyAlaGlyCys


 


ValArgProCysSerIleAlaPheGlyAlaGluGlnLeuThrIleLysGlyAsnSerGly


 


AspGlyAsnGlyArgIleLeuAspSerTyrPheAsnTrpTyrTyrThrSerIleSerVal


 


SerThrIleIleAlaLeuSerValIleAlaTyrIleGlnGluAshLeuClyTrpLysIle


 


GlyPheGlyValProAlaValLeuMetLeuValSerValIleSerPheIleIleGlySer


 


ProLeuTyrValLysValLysProSerGluSerLeuLeuThrAsnPheAlaArgValVal


 


ValValAlaThrLysAsnArgLysLeuSerLeuProAspHisAspSerAspArgTyrCys


 


GlnGlyHisAspSerLysLeuLysValProThrAspSerLeuArgPheLeuAsnLysAla


 


CysValIleArgAsnProGluThrAspLeuAsnArgAspGlySerIleSerAsnProTrp


 


AsnLeuCysThrIleGluGlnValGluSerLeuLysSerLeuLeuArgValIleProMet






The nip-3 allele of MtNIP refers to a mutant having the following sequence:
M. truncatula nip-3 mutant gene sequence (mutation highlighted):
Medicago truncatula nip-3 Cdna (SEQ ID No.: 7)








ATGGAGTACACAAACAGTGATGATGCTACAAATGAAAAACTCATTGAAAATGGCAGCTCTTCATCATCTT



 


CTCAACCCAGAAAGGGTGGTTTAAGAACCATGCCCTTTATCATAGTGAATGAGTGTCTTGAGAAAGTGGC


 


AAGTTATGGAATAATGCCAAACATGATATTATACTTGAGGGATGATTATAACATGCCTATTGCTAAGGCT


 


AGTTATGTTCTTTCTACTTGGTCTGCTATGTCCAATGTTTTGTCCATCTTTGGTGCTTTTCTCTCTGATT


 


CTTACTTGGGTCGCTTCAATGTCATCACTATTGGCTCCTTTTCTAGCCTTCTTGGTTTAACCGTTTTGTG


 


GTTAACTGCCATGATCCCGGTGCTAAAACCTACCTGTGCATCACTCTTTGAAATCTGTAATTCTGCTACT


 


TCATCCCAACAAGCAGTTCTGTTCCTTTCCTTAGGATTAATTTCAATTGGAGCTGGTTGTGTTAGACCTT


 


GTTCCATAGCCTTTGGAGCA AGCAATTGACTATTAAGGGAAATTCTGGTGATGGGAATGGCAGGATCTT


 


CGATAGTTACTTTAATTGGTATTATACCTCAATTTCAGTTTCAACCATTATCGCGTTGAGTGTGATTGCT


 


TACATTCAAGAAAACCTTGGATGGAAAATTGGGTTTGGAGTACCTGCTGTGCTAATGCTCGTATCGGTCA


 


TCAGTTTCATTATTGGTTCACCGTTATATGTCAAAGTGAAGCCAAGTGAAAGCTTACTCACTAATTTTGC


 


AAGAGTAGTTGTGGTGGCAACCAAGAACAGAAAACTTAGTCTTCCTGATCACGACTCTGATCGTTACTGT


 


CAAGGTCATGATTCAAAGCTGAAGGTTCCTACCGATAGCCTTAGGTTTTTGAACAAAGCTTGCGTAATAA


 


GAAATCCTGAGACAGATCTTAATCGAGATGGGTCAATTTCAAATCCGTGGAACCTATGCACAATAGAACA


 


GGTGGAGTCACTGAAGTCTTTGCTCAGAGTCATTCCTATGTGGTCAACGGGAATCTTTATGATGGCGACT


 


CAGAGTTCATTTTCTACTCTTCAAGCCAAAACTTTGAACCGAACGTTATTCGGCAATTTCAATTTTCCTG


 


CAGGATCGTTCAATCTTATCTTGATATTCACCTTAACAATAGTAATTCCTTTATATGACCGTGTAGGAGT


 


ACCTCTACTAGCTAAATACGCAGGCCGGCCTAGAGGATTCAGTTTTAAAGTCCGCATCGGGATAGGAATG


 


CTGTTTGCAATTGTAGCTAAAGCAGTAGCAGCTATTGTTGAAACGGTGAGACGAAATGCAGCGATTGAAC


 


AAGGGTTTGAGGACCAACCTAATGCTGAAATTAACATGTCGGCTTTATGGCTTGCTCCAGAGTTTATTTT


 


GTTTGGATTCGCCGAAGCTTTCACACCAGTTGGACTGGTTGAGTTTTTCTACTGTTTTTTCCCTAAGAGT


 


ATGTCTAGTTTTGCAATGGCTATGTTCACATTGGGACTAGCTTGTTCTGACGTAGTTTCAGGTGTGCTTG


 


TGAGCATTGTGGACACGGTCACTAGTATTGGAGGGAATGAGAGCTGGTTATCGACTAACATCAATAGGGG


 


ACATTTGAATTACTACTACGGGCTACTCACTTTCTTAGGCATTCTTAACTACTTCTATTATCTTGTTATT


 


TGTTGGGCTTATGGACCCATACAGGGAGAGAAACATGAAGATTCGGCCAGAAAGAAAGACGATAAATTTG


 


GTTACAGGGAGTTGCCTACTTCATAG






Medicago truncatula nip-3 amino acid (SEQ ID No.: 8)









MetGluTyrThrAsnSerAspAspAlaThrAsnGluLysLeuIleGluAsnGlySerSer



 


SerSerSerSerGlnProArgLysGlyGlyLeuArgThrMetProPheIleIleValAsn


 


GluCysLeuGluLysValAlaSerTyrGlyIleMetProAsnMetIleLeuTyrLeuArg


 


AspAspTyrAsnMetProIleAlaLysAlaSerTyrValLeuSerThrTrpSerAlaMet


 


SerAsnValLeuSerIlePheGlyAlaPheLeuSerAspSerTyrLeuGlyArgPheAsn


 


ValIleThrIleGlySerPheSerSerLeuLeuGlyLeuThrValLeuTrpLeuThrAla


 


MetIleProValLeuLysProThrCysAlaSerLeuPheGluIleCysAsnSerAlaThr


 


SerSerGlnGLnAlaValLeuPheLeuSerLeuGlyLeuIleSerIleGlyAlaGlyCys


 


ValArgProCysSerIleAlaPheGlyAlaLysGlnLeuThrIleLysGlyAsnSerGly


 


AspGlyAsnGlyArgIleLeuAspSerTyrPheAsnTrpTyrTyrThrSerIleSerVal


 


SerThrIleIleAlaLeuSerValIleAlaTyrIleGLnGluAsnLeuGlyTrpLysIle


 


GlyPheGlyValProAlaValLeuMetLeuValSerValIleSerPheIleIleGlySer


 


ProLeuTyrValLysValLysProSerGluSerLeuLeuThrAsnPheAlaArgValVal


 


ValValAlaThrLysAsnArgLysLeuSerLeuProAspHisAspSerAspArgTyrCys


 


GlnGlyHisAspSerLysLeuLysValProThrAspSerLeuArgPheLeuAsnLysAla


 


CysValIleArgAsnProGluThrAspLeuAsnArgAspGlySerIleSerAsnProTrp


 


AsnLeuCysThrIleGluGlnValGluSerLeuLysSerLeuLeuArgValIleProMet


 


TrpSerThrGlyIlePheMetMetAlaThrGlnSerSerPheSerThrLeuGlnAlaLys


 


ThrLeuAsnArgThrLeuPheGlyAsnPheAsnPheProAlaGlySerPheAsnLeuIle


 


LeuIlePheThrLeuThrIleValIleProLeuTyrAspArgValGlyValProLeuLeu


 


AlaLysTyrAlaGlyArgProArgGlyPheSerPheLysValArgIleGlyIleGlyMet


 


LeuPheAlaIleValAlaLysAlaValAlaAlaIleValGluThrValArgArgAsnAla


 


AlaIleGluGlnGlyPheGluAspGlnProAsnAlaGluIleAsnMetSerAlaLeuTrp


 


LeuAlaProGluPheIleLeuPheGlyPheAlaGluAlaPheThrProValGlyLeuVal


 


GluPhePheTyrCysPhePheProLysSerMetSerSerPheAlaMetAlaMetPheThr


 


LeuGlyLeuAlaCysSerAspValValSerGlyValLeuValSerIleValAspThrVal


 


ThrSerIleGlyGlyAsnGluSerTrpLeuSerThrAsnIleAsnArgGlyHisLeuAsn


 


TyrTyrTyrGlyLeuLeuThrPheLeuGlyIleLeuAsnTyrPheTyrTyrLeuValIle


 


CysTrpAlaTyrGlyProIleGlnGlyGluLysHisGluAspSerAlaArgLysLysAsp


 


AspLysPheGlyTyrArgGluLeuProThrSer






In one embodiment of the present invention, the MtNIP gene is expressed in a plant to cause a significant increase in biomass. In certain embodiments, the MtNIP gene is the Medicago truncatula (Medicago) MtNIP gene, and the plant is a Arabidopsis thaliana, a Medicago Truncatula or a tobacco plant.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the MtNIP gene is expressed in a plant to cause the plant to be larger than a wild-type plant. In certain embodiments, the MtNIP gene is the Medicago truncatula (Medicago) MtNIP gene, and the plant is Arabidopsis thaliana, Medicago Truncatula or a tobacco plant.
In certain embodiments, the expression of the MtNIP gene in plants causes them to flower earlier than wild-type plants.
In certain embodiments of the invention, other genes in the NRT1/PTR family may be over-expressed in plants to result in increased biomass, plant growth, and early flowering. The gene may be one of the 53 members of the NRT1/PTR family in Arabidopsis or the 80 members in rice, of which only a subset investigated (Tsay et al., 2007).
In certain embodiments, the plant may be a member of the Brassica family, such as oilseed rape, canola, cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, Brussels sprout. Chinese cabbage, bak choi, turnip, or mustard or other plants.
Example 1
Xenopus oocytes Expressing MtNIP Transport Nitrate in a pH-Dependent Manner
Xenopus oocytes that were microinjected with in vitro transcribed MtNIP RNA, or water as a control, were incubated with 250 μM or 5 mM nitrate at pH 5.5 or pH 7.4 (FIG. 3). At the end of incubation, the oocytes were rinsed, lysed and assayed for nitrate uptake using a spectrophotometric assay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Mich.). At pH 5.5, MtNIP-expressing oocytes were able to take up significant nitrate provided at 250 μM nitrate almost as well as at 5 mM nitrate, while the water-injected control oocytes were not.
Example 2
NIP-3 Mutant Protein Can Transport Nitrate in Xenopus oocytes, and NIP-1 and LATD (NIP-2) Mutant Proteins Cannot Transport Nitrate in Xenopus oocytes 
The latd (nip-2) allele is null mutation, with a nonsense mutation in the middle of the MtNIP gene; in contrast, both the nip-1 and nip-3 alleles have mis-sense mutations (Yendrek et al., 2010). Xenopus oocytes were microinjected with in vitro transcribed nip-1, latd (nip-2), or nip-3 RNA, or water as a control, incubated with 250 μM or 5 mM nitrate at pH 5.5, rinsed, lysed and assayed for nitrate uptake (FIG. 4). The results show that nip-1 and latd (nip-2) proteins cannot transport nitrate, but nip-3 protein and wild-type MtNIP protein can nip-3 mutants have root architecture and nodulation defects (Teillet et al., 2008). Thus, MtNIP protein has another function besides nitrate transport.
Example 3
Arabidopsis chl1-5 Mutants are Restored to Chlorate Sensitivity by MtNIP
MtNIP was over-expressed in Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutants that contain a well-characterized deletion in the NRT1(CHL) dual affinity nitrate transporter gene, using the Arabidopsis EF1 αpromoter (Auriac and Timmers, 2007). The mutant is chlorate resistant (Tsay et al., 1993; Huang et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1998). The herbicide chlorate is a nitrate analog that is taken up via the CHL 1(NRT 1.1) nitrate transporter and reduced to toxic chlorite by nitrate reductase. chl1-5 mutants containing the pAtEF1 α-MtNIP construct are restored to chlorate sensitivity, similar to chl1-5 mutants containing a control pAtEF1 α-AtNRT1. 1(CHL) construct (FIG. 5). This demonstrates a role for MtNIP in the transport of chlorate via a nitrate transporter route.
Example 4
Growth Phenotype of Arabidopsis Plants Expressing the M. truncatula MtNIP Gene
The Arabidopsis plants transformed with pAtEF1 α-MtNIP were found to have the unexpected phenotype of being much larger than wild-type (FIG. 6, and Table 1). Controls transformed with empty vector showed similar growth to the wild-type (not shown). It is possible that the high affinity nitrate transport function of MtNIP is responsible for the observed growth phenotype. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, since Xenopus oocyte expressing the nip-3 mutant version of the gene transport nitrate, which means that MtNIP has a second, still unknown function, it is also possible that this other, still unknown function of MtNIP is responsible for the observed growth phenotype.







TABLE 1







Dry weight of Arabidopsis plants at 8 weeks post-germination










Weight
Fold increase,



(Average +/− standard
average compared


Genotype
deviation, grams)
to control





Not transformed with MtNIP
1.56 +/− 0.33



Not transformed with MtNIP
1.71 +/− 0.45


Not transformed with MtNIP
1.93 +/− 0.69


Not transformed with MtNIP
1.16 +/− 0.41


Transformed with MtNIP
5.00 +/− 1.60
3.1


Transformed with MtNIP
5.87 +/− 1.78
3.7


Transformed with MtNIP
6.99 +/− 1.04
4.4


Transformed with MtNIP
5.57 +/− 1.80
3.5









No reports were found in the scientific literature describing constitutive expression of an NRT1/PTR family protein to result in an increase in growth or biomass of a plant. Two reports were found, one in the literature and one on a poster, of a rice gene in the NRT2 family causing increases in growth when it is over-expressed in rice. However, the NRT2 family is not related to the NRT1/PTR family—these two gene families are phylogenetically distinct (Tsay et al., 2007).
Example 6
As stated above, the Medicago truncatula NIP/LATD gene encodes a protein found in a clade of nitrate transporters within the large NRT1(PTR) family that also encodes transporters of di- and tri-peptides, dicarboxylates, auxin and abscisic acid. Of the NRT1(PTR) members known to transport nitrate, most are low-affinity transporters. This embodiment shows that Medicago nip/latd mutants are more defective in their lateral root responses to nitrate provided at low (250 μM) concentrations than at higher (5 mM) concentrations. However nitrate uptake experiments showed no discernible differences in uptake in the mutants. Heterologous expression experiments showed that MtNIP/LATD encodes a nitrate transporter: expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes conferred upon the oocytes the ability to take up nitrate from the media with high affinity and expression of MtNIP/LATD in an Arabidopsis chl1(nrt1.1) mutant rescued the chlorate susceptibility phenotype. X. laevis oocytes expressing mutant Mtnip-1 and Mtlatd were unable to take up nitrate from the media, but oocytes expressing the less severe Mtnip-3 allele were, demonstrating that Mtnip-3 is altered in another activity besides nitrate transport. Medicago nip/latd mutants have pleiotropic defects in nodulation and root architecture. Expression of the Arabidopsis NRT1.1 gene in mutant Mtnip-1 roots partially rescued Mtnip-1 for root architecture defects, but not for nodulation defects, suggesting the spectrum of activities inherent in AtNRT1.1 is different from those possessed by MtNIP/LATD. Collectively, the data show that MtNIP/LATD is a high affinity nitrate transporter and has a second unknown function which is critical for nodulation.
All plants require nitrogen (N) as an essential nutrient and are able to acquire N from nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) in the soil. Nitrate acquisition begins with its transport into root cells, accomplished by NO3− transporters. Soil NO3− concentrations can vary by five orders of magnitude (Crawford, 1995) and to cope with the variability, plants have evolved both high-affinity (HATS) and low-affinity (LATS) transport systems. These are encoded by two gene families: the phylogenetically distinct NRT1(PTR) and NRT2 families. Members of these families also participate in movement of NO3− throughout the plant and within plant cells (Miller et al., 2007; Segonzac et al., 2007; Tsay et al., 2007; Almagro et al., 2008: Lin et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Barbier-Brygoo et al., 2011; Wang and Tsay, 2011; Xu et al., 2012). Proteins in the CLC transporter family also transport NO3−; these transporters are associated with cytosol to organelle NO3− movement (Zifarelli and Pusch, 2010).
NRT1(PTR) is a large family of transporters, comprising 53 members in Arabidopsis, 84 members in rice, with NRT1 PTR) members known in several other species (Tsay et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2010). In addition to transporting NO3− coupled to H+ movement, members of the NRT1(PTR) family have been found to transport di- or tripeptides, amino acids (Waterworth and Bray, 2006), dicarboxylic acids (Jeong et al., 2004), auxin (Krouk et al., 2010) and/or abscisic acid (Kanno et al., 2012). Only a small number of NRT1(PTR) proteins have been functionally studied compared to the large number that exist in higher plants, and thus the number of biochemical functions ascribed to this family may expand.
Of the NRT1(PTR) members known to transport NO3−, most are LATS transporters. An important exception is Arabidopsis NRT1.1(CHL1), a dual-affinity transporter, that is the most extensively studied NRT1(PTR) protein. AtNRT1.1(CHL1) was identified initially on the basis of its ability to confer chlorate toxicity resistance and was the first of this family to be cloned (Doddema et al., 1978; Tsay et al., 1993). AtNRT1.1(CHL1) is an essential component of NO3− transport and NO3− signaling pathways, with important roles regulating expression of other NO3− transporters and root architecture (Remans et al., 2006; Walch-Liu et al., 2006; Walch-Liu and Forde, 2008). Its expression is inducible by NO3− (Huang et al., 1996). Reversible phosphorylation is essential to its ability to switch between LATS and HATS activity (Liu and Tsay, 2003). In addition, AtNRT1.1(CHL1) acts as a NO3− sensor (Munos et al., 2004; Ho et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009) and has been shown to transport auxin in a NO3− concentration dependent manner (Krouk et al., 2010). It has been suggested that AtNRT1.1's ability to transport auxin may be part of its NO3− sensing mechanism (Krouk et al., 2010; Krouk et al., 2010; Gojon et al., 2011).
Most legumes and actinorhizal plants have the additional ability to form symbiotic N-fixing root nodules with soil bacteria, enabling them to thrive in NO3− and NH4+ depleted environments. Legume nodulation commences with signal exchange between the plant and rhizobia, followed by root cortical cell divisions, invasion of the root at the site of the cell divisions by rhizobia inside plant-derived infection threads (“Its”), and subsequent endocytosis of rhizobia into newly-divided plant host cells, forming symbiosomes. Within symbiosomes, the rhizobia differentiate into bacteroids that are capable of N fixation (Oldroyd and Downie, 2008; Kouchi et al., 2010). Before N fixation begins, nodules are a sink for the plant's N; N is required to support nodule organogenesis and rhizobial proliferation and differentiation in nodules (Udvardi and Day, 1997). After N fixation begins, nodules are a source of bioavailable N and are a large carbon sink because of the energetic needs of the rhizobia that fix N (White et al., 2007).
NRT1(PTR) transporters have received less attention in legumes and actinorhizal plants than in other plants, but are beginning to be investigated. Several soybean (Glycine max) NRT1(PTR) transporter cDNAs have been cloned and their transcription patterns studied. These were predicted to transport NO3−, but have not been functionally characterized (Yokoyama et al., 2001). Benedito et al. (2010) recognized 111 non-redundant Medicago truncatula sequences corresponding to genes in the 2.A.17 transporter class, containing NRT1(PTR) genes (Benedito et al., 2010). The recent availability of three sequenced legume genomes will add to our knowledge of this important gene family (Sato et al., 2008; Schmutz et al., 2010; Young et al., 2011). In faba bean (Vicia faba), two NRT1(PTR) transporters have been studied; one was demonstrated to transport di-peptides in yeast, while the second was found to be phylogenetically close to a soybean NRT1(PTR) (Miranda et al., 2003). In alder (Alnus glutinosa) nodules, NRT1(PTR) transporter AgDCAT localizes to the symbiotic interface and transports dicarboxylic acid from the cytosol towards its symbiotic partner, Frankia (Jeong et al., 2004). The Medicago MtNRT1.3 transporter was shown to be a dual-affinity NO3− transporter; MtNRT1.3 is up-regulated by the absence of NO3− (Morere-Le Paven et al., 2011).
The Medicago NIP/LATD gene encodes a predicted NRT1(PTR) transporter (Harris and Dickstein, 2010; Yendrek et al., 2010) and the three known nip and laid mutants have pleiotropic defects in nodulation and root architecture. Mtnip-1, containing a missense (A497V) mutation in one of the NIP/LATD protein's transmembrane domains, is well characterized with respect to nodulation phenotypes (Veereshlingam et al., 2004). Mtnip-1 develops nodules that initiate rhizobial invasion but fail to release rhizobia from infection threads. Its nodules lack meristems and accumulate polyphenolics, a sign of host defense. Mtnip-1 plants also have defective root architecture (Veereshlingam et al., 2004). The Mtlatd mutant has the most severe phenotype, caused by a stop codon (W341STOP) in the middle of the NIP/LATD putative protein (Yendrek et al., 2010). Mtlatd has serious defects in root architecture with a non-persistent primary root meristem, lateral roots (“LRs”) that fail to make the transition from LR primordia to LRs containing a meristem, and defects in root hairs. Mtlatd also has defective nodules (Bright et al., 2005). The missense Mtnip-3 mutant (E171K) is the least affected, forming invaded nodules with meristems and polyphenol accumulation. Mtnip-3 has near-normal root architecture (Teillet et al., 2008; Yendrek et al., 2010).
Here, function of the MtNIP/LATD protein is investigated. We find that MtNIP/LATD is a high-affinity NO3− transporter and provide evidence that it has at least one additional biochemical function relevant for root nodule formation and root architecture development.
Mtnip Mutants' Nitrate Phenotypes.
Because of MtNIP/LATD's similarity to low affinity NO3− transporters in the NRT1(PTR) family, one hypothesis is that it may be a low affinity NO3− transporter (Yendrek et al., 2010). Bioavailable N is known to suppress nodulation and to inhibit N fixation in mature N-fixing nodules (Streeter, 1988; Fei and Vessey, 2008). It is also possible that Mtnip/latd mutants would develop functional root nodules in conditions of NO3− sufficiency. To test whether Mtnip-1 was altered in suppression of nodulation by bioavailable N, Mtnip-1 mutant plants were cultivated in 1 mM and 10 mM KNO3 and also in 5 mM NH4NO3 in the presence of S. meliloti. As shown in Table 1, Mtnip-1 formed low numbers of nodules under these conditions compared to no N conditions, similar to wild-type (A17), suggesting normal suppression by bioavailable N sources. The few nodules that formed in Mtnip-1 in 1 mM KNO3, 10 mM KNO3 or 5 mM NO3NH4 had an Mtnip-1 nodule phenotype.
To examine whether the mutants had defects in NO3− uptake, we grew Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 mutants, with wild-type A17 as control, in two different concentrations of KNO3: 250 μM and 5 mM. Uptake was measured by monitoring depletion of NO3− from the media. As can be seen in FIG. 7, no differences in NO3− uptake were observed in the mutants, suggesting that low and high affinity NO3− transport systems are functioning in these plants. However, because measurement of depletion of NO3− from the media is less sensitive than measuring NO3− influx, subtle changes in NO3− uptake may not have been detected in this experimental system.
In Arabidopsis, growth of plants in different NO3− concentrations is known to affect root architecture (Zhang et al., 2000; Linkohr et al., 2002). To determine if Medicago nip mutants' LR phenotype were affected by NO3−, we grew Mtnip-1, Mtnip-3 and A17 in the presence of 0 μM. 250 μM, and 5 mM KNO3, and examined root growth parameters after two weeks. Wild-type A17 produced longer LRs in both NO3− concentrations tested than it did at 0 NO3− and slightly shorter LRs in 5 mM as compared to 250 μM KNO3 (FIG. 2). Lateral root lengths of both Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 were significantly shorter than those of wild-type in all conditions tested, with one exception; in 5 mM KNO3, the average LR lengths of Mtnip-3 were similar to those of A17. Both Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 mutants had longer LRs when grown in 5 mM KNO3 (FIG. 2C) than they did in 250 μM KNO3 (FIG. 2B) and when grown in the absence of NO3− (FIG. 2A). These data are consistent with an MtNIP/LATD function in high affinity, low concentration NO3− uptake or response.
MtNIP/LATD Protein Transports Nitrate, but not Histidine, in Xenopus laevis Oocytes.
To test whether the MtNIP/LATD protein transports NO3−, we expressed MtNIP/LATD in X. laevis oocytes and assayed them for acquisition of NO3− transport activity. Transport activity was initially assessed at two different NO3− concentrations to categorize transporter affinity, and at pH 5.5 and at pH 7.4, to test pH dependence. As shown in FIGS. 3A and B, oocytes expressing MtNIP/LATD were capable of significant NO3− uptake above the water injected control oocytes at both low, 250 μM, and high, 5 mM, NO3−, concentrations at pH 5.5. However, at pH 7.4, there was not significant NO3− uptake (FIG. 3C, D), indicating that transport is H+ coupled. We compared MtNIP/LATD NO3− transport to that of the dual-affinity AtNRT1.1 transporter and found that MtNIP/LATD had slightly lower nitrate transport than AtNRT1.1 at 250 μM NO3−. At 5 mM NO3−, MtNIP/LATD transported approximately 20% as much nitrate as did AtNRT1.1 (Suppl. FIG. 1), suggesting that MtNIP/LATD is not dual-affinity. To determine MtNIP/LATD's Km, we measured NO3− uptake in MtNIP/LATD-injected oocytes compared to water-injected control oocytes over NO3− concentrations ranging from 50 μM to 10 mM. MtNIP/LATD displays saturable kinetics for NO3− uptake, with a Km of 160 μM (FIGS. 3E and F). The data show only one saturation point (FIG. 3E) and thus, indicate that MtNIP/LATD has single, high affinity NO3− transport.
Because the NRT1(PTR) family BnNRT1.2 NO3− transporter also transports histidine (Zhou et al., 1998), a rat NRT1(PTR) family member transports both peptides and histidine (Yamashita et al., 1997), and Arabidopsis AtPTR1 and AtPTR2 peptide transporters also transport histidine (Tsay et al., 2007), we assessed histidine uptake in MtNIP/LATD-injected oocytes compared to water-injected control oocytes. At pH 5.5 and 1 mM histidine, we observed no histidine transport (Suppl. Table 1).
Proteins Encoded by Two MtNIP/LATD Mutant Alleles but not a Third Allele are Defective in Nitrate Transport in the Oocyte System.
The finding that MtNIP/LATD transports NO3− opens the possibility that the defects observed in the Mtnip/latd mutants result from defective NO3− transport. To determine if the proteins encoded by the available defective MtNIP/LATD genes are capable of NO3− transport, we tested them in the X. laevis oocyte system. The results demonstrate that the missense Mtnip-1 and truncated Mtlatd proteins are defective in NO3− transport at 5 mM NO3−, while the Mtnip-3 protein is capable of transport at this higher concentration (FIG. 4). Oocytes expressing Mtnip-3 protein as well as Mtnip-1 protein were assessed for high affinity transport at 250 μM NO3−; since the Mtlatd protein, encoded by a gene with a nonsense codon in the middle of MtNIP/LATD, failed to transport NO3− at 5 mM NO3−, it was not tested for transport at 250 μM NO3−. Mtnip-3 was capable of transport at 250 μM, while Mtnip-1 was not. Because the Mtnip-3 mutant has defective root architecture, aberrant nodulation, and fixes far less N than wild-type (Teillet et al., 2008), we conclude that it is defective in another function besides NO3− transport.
MtNIP/LATD Expression in the Arabidopsis chl1-5 Mutant Restores Chlorate Sensitivity.
Although MtNIP/LATD transports NO3− in oocytes, it could be argued that it may not function as a NO3− transporter in planta. The NO3− transporter activity of MtNIP/LATD was further tested by studying its ability to complement the well-characterized Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant, containing a large deletion in the AtNRT1.1 gene (Munos et al., 2004). This mutant was originally isolated on the basis of its resistance to the herbicide chlorate, which is taken up through the AtNRT1.1(AtCHL1) NO3− transporter and reduced by NO3− reductase to toxic chlorite (Doddema et al., 1978; Tsay et al., 1993). Complementation of this phenotype is easy to score. A construct containing MtNIP/LATD cDNA under the control of the constitutive Arabidopsis EF1αpromoter (pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD) was introduced into Atchl1-5 plants, with plants transformed by AtNRT1.1 cDNA regulated by the same promoter (pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1) serving as positive control. Atchl1-5/pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD was found to be sensitive to chlorate, similar to the positive control Atchl1-5 plants transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 and wild-type Col-0. Negative control mutant Atchl1-5 plants were resistant to chlorate, as expected (FIG. 5, Suppl. FIG. 2). Wild-type AtCol-0 and the Atchl1-5 plants constitutively expressing either AtNRT1.1 or MtNIP/LATD showed a reduction in fresh weight and chlorophyll content after chlorate treatment compared to the resistant Atchl1-5 plants (Table II). A second independent transformed line of Atchl1-5 transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD was also constructed and found to be chlorate sensitive as well (Suppl. FIG. 2). We therefore conclude that since MtNIP/LATD transports the NO3− analog chlorate in planta, it is extremely likely to transport NO3− in planta as well.
AtNRT1.1 but not AgDCAT1, Partially Rescues the Medicago Nip-1 Phenotype.
Since MtNIP/LATD restored chlorate sensitivity to the Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant, we tested whether AtNRT1.1 would restore the Medicago nip-1 mutant to its wild-type phenotype. At the time that this experiment was performed, AtNRT1.1 was the only NRT1(PTR) member known to be a high affinity (dual affinity) NO3− transporter (Tsay et al., 2007). We used composite Medicago plant hairy roots (Boisson-Dernier et al., 2001) transformed with pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 as our test system. Composite plants were grown in aeroponic chambers in the absence of NO3−, inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti/phemA::lacZ (Boivin et al., 1990), and root architecture and nodulation were evaluated at 15 days post inoculation (dpi). The results showed that AtNRT1.1 partially restored Mtnip-1 root architecture (FIG. 6). The Mtnip-1 mutants transformed with the AtNRT1.1 expression construct had longer primary roots, more elongated LRs and longer LRs than Mtnip-1 mutants transformed with empty vector. However, the nodules in Mtnip-1 plants transformed with the pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 construct had an Mtnip-1-phenotype, with the presence of brown pigments, no obvious meristem, and did not differentiate into the zones that are the hallmark of nitrogen fixing nodules (FIG. 7). Control plants transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD had wild-type phenotype nodules (FIG. 7F), and show comparable rescue of nodulation and root architecture phenotypes as those transformed with pMtNIP, LATD-MtNIP/LATD (Suppl. FIG. 3) showing that use of the Arabidopsis EF1α promoter is not a limiting factor for complementation of the Mtnip-1 phenotype. Overall, the experiment shows that although AtNRT1.1 partially restores the root architecture phenotype, it is not able to restore normal nodulation to the Mtnip-1 plants.
We also tested whether the gene encoding the alder symbiotic AgDCAT1 dicarboxylate transporter could restore normal root development or nodulation to Mtnip-1 plants, using a similar approach as for AtNRT1.1, in composite transformed plants. Mtnip-1 plants expressing AgDCAT1 had a phenotype indistinguishable from Mtnip-1 plants transformed with an empty vector; in contrast. Mtnip-1 plants expressing MtNIP/LATD were restored to wild-type. Wild-type A17 plants' phenotypes were unaffected by AgDCAT1 expression (Suppl. FIG. 3).
Discussion
The major finding of the work reported here is that MtNIP/LATD protein is a NO3− transporter, and its NO3− transport activity partially correlates with root architecture development. Our results also show that MtNIP/LATD has another unknown biochemical activity which is important to MtNIP/LATD's biological roles in nodule development and in the modulation of root architecture.
Data for MtNIP/LATD NO3− transport come from two complementary experimental approaches. When MtNIP/LATD is expressed in the heterologous X. laevis oocyte system, it enables the oocytes to transport NO3− in a pH dependent manner, demonstrating that NO3− transport is Fr driven (FIG. 3), similar to other NO3− transporters in the NRT1(PTR) family (Tsay et al., 1993). NO3− uptake was characterized as having a Km of 160 μM, making it a high-affinity (HATS) transporter. A second line of evidence that MtNIP/LATD is a NO3− transporter is that its gene's constitutive expression can complement the Arabidopsis chl1-5 mutant, containing a deletion spanning the AtNRT1.1 gene (Munos et al., 2004). Atchl1-5 mutants expressing MtNIP/LATD are susceptible to chlorate, indicating that MtNIP/LATD confers on them the ability to take up the herbicide chlorate, a NO3− analog, from the media (FIG. 5). Both approaches showing MtNIP/LATD transports NO3− indicate that the direction of NO3− transport is from outside to inside cells.
Although not wanting to be bound by theory. One might expect Mtnip/latd mutants to exhibit defects in NO3− uptake. We measured NO3− uptake from media by Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 mutants and control wild-type Medicago A17, and observed no differences between the plants in NO3− uptake at either 250 μM or at 5 mM NO3−, representative of HATS and LATS respectively (FIG. 1). This suggests that MtNIP/LATD is not a rate-limiting transporter for NO3− uptake into plant tissue. MtNIP/LATD is expressed in primary and lateral root tips (Yendrek et al., 2010); if MtNIP/LATD's primary biological role is to transport NO3−, it may constitute only a small portion of NO3− transport in Medicago roots. It is also possible that in Mtnip/latd mutants, the plant compensates by upregulating the activity of another transporter. Another possibility is that MtNIP/LATD's transport function may be critical for redistribution of NO3− within the plant. We found that Mtnip-1 is apparently normal for NO3− suppression of nodulation (Table 1), leading us conclude that MtNIP/LATD is likely not involved in this pathway (Streeter, 1988; Fei and Vessey, 2008), and/or there are other NO3− transporters that can compensate for this function.
Previously, the effects of 10 mM and 50 mM KNO3 on primary root length and LR density in Mtlatd mutants were monitored; Mtlatd plants, like wild type, do not show altered LR density in response to global increases in NO3− (Yendrek et al., 2010). Here, we examined LR lengths of Mtnip-1 and Mtnip-3 plants grown in 0 μM, 250 μM or 5 mM KNO3 and found that the LR length phenotype was rescued for Mtnip-3 and partially rescued for Mtnip-1 at the 5 mM KNO3 level, but not at 250 μM KNO3 (FIG. 2), suggesting that MtNIP/LATD might have a more biologically important role at lower NO3− concentrations than at higher ones. However, these experiments did not control for the effects of salt concentration on root architecture, which could have affected abscisic acid levels, leading to changes in LR lengths (Liang and Harris, 2005; Liang et al., 2007), and thus are only suggestive.
Even though nitrate uptake was not limited in Mtnip/latd mutants compared to wild type plants, nitrate uptake differed when these alleles were expressed in oocytes and assayed for nitrate transport. Nitrate uptake experiments in the oocyte system showed that the protein encoded by the weakest allele, Mtnip-3, transported NO3− indistinguishably from wild-type, while the proteins encoded by the two more severe alleles. Mtnip-1 and Mtlatd, did not (FIG. 4). The Mtnip-3 mutant has a phenotype: it forms Fix+/− nodules that accumulate polyphenolics, and has minor defects in root architecture, in primary (Teillet et al., 2008; Yendrek et al., 2010) and lateral (FIG. 2) root length. Thus, there is a correlation between MtNIP/LATD's ability to transport NO3− and Mtnip/latd mutants' abilities to form and maintain nodule and root meristems and to form nodules invaded intracellularly by rhizobia. Despite that NO3− transport by Mtnip-3 protein is indistinguishable from the transport by wild-type MtNIP/LATD. Mtnip-3 has a root and nodule phenotype. This indicates that MtNIP/LATD must have at least one other function besides NO3− transport.
To further address the possible link between MtNIP/LATD and NO3− transport, we expressed AtNRT1.1 in Mtnip-1 roots. We observed that the AtNRT.1.1-transformed Mtnip-1 plants are partially restored for their root architecture phenotype, but not for the nodulation phenotype. The use of pAtEF1α is not a limiting factor for phenotype rescue, since MtNIP/LATD, expressed under the control of the same promoter was able to restore both the root architecture phenotype (not shown) and the nodulation phenotype (FIG. 7). No effect was observed when AtNRT1.1 was expressed in wild-type A17 plants (FIGS. 6 and 7). This suggests that AtNRT1.1 protein's dual affinity NO3− transport activity affects Mtnip-1 root architecture, and supports the idea that MtNIP/LATD's NO3− transport activity has an important role in modulating root developmental responses. Additionally, the lack of full complementation of the root architecture defects by AtNRT1.1 and the non-complementation of the nodulation phenotype by AtNRT1.1 suggest that there is a function of MtNIP/LATD that is different from that of AtNRT1.1. Alternatively, it is possible that AtNRT1.1 is not as stable in Medicago as is MtNIP/LATD, especially in nodules, and that this is the cause of AtNRT1.1's inability to complement Mtnip-1's nodulation phenotype. Because AtNRT1.1 has been demonstrated to transport auxin in the absence of NO3− (Krouk et al., 2010), and NO3− was only provided during plant transformation in these experiments, another possible explanation for the observed effects on Mtnip's roots is that the partial restoration of normal root architecture was brought about by AtNRT1.1 induced changes in auxin concentration. When normally expressed in Arabidopsis, AtNRT1.1 is thought to prevent auxin accumulation at LR tips by mediating basipetal auxin transport in LRs, thus halting LR growth (Krouk et al., 2010); this is the opposite of what we observed in the Mtnip-1 mutant expressing AtNRT1.1 (FIG. 6). Because our experiments used a constitutive promoter to express AtNRT1.1, it is possible that the perturbation of auxin gradients within the roots caused the observed changes in root architecture. It is also curious that the nodule phenotype of Mtnip-1 plants transformed with AtNRT1.1 is different from that of Mtnip-3. If the ability of Mtnip-3 nodules to form a meristem and allow rhizobia to invade intracellularly is related to Mtnip-3 protein's ability to transport NO3−, one would expect to find the same phenotype in Mtnip-1 plants transformed with AtNRT1.1 as in Mtnip-3, which is not the case. This datum further supports the idea that MtNIP/LATD protein's activity is more than simply NO3− transport and is also not explained by the spectrum of activities inherent in AtNRT1.1.
What role could MtNIP/LATD mediated NO3− transport play in nodulation, root architecture development or their regulation? MtNIP/LATD NO3− transport could supply N at low NO3− concentrations to dividing plant and bacterial cells early in nodulation, and also to differentiated nodules, at the dividing and endo-reduplicating cells present in zones I and II, where MtNIP/LATD's promoter is active (Yendrek et al., 2010). The MtNIP/LATD promoter is also active in primary root meristems, LR primordia and meristems and surrounding tissue, and MtNIP/LATD NO3− transport could have a similar role there. In this case, the supply of NO3− to these tissues would provide the N required for basic cellular functions required by dividing primordial tissues distant from the primary meristem, and facilitating the transition from primordium to self-sustaining meristem by these nascent lateral root organs.
Alternately, MtNIP/LATD could transport NO3− as a precursor to the potent signaling molecule nitric oxide (NO), early in nodulation and LR development. NO has been detected in Medicago nodule primordia, not containing intracellular rhizobia, suggesting an active NO pathway in these cells, as well as in infection threads, where NO could come from either symbiotic partner (del Giudice et al., 2011). NO has also been detected in LR primordia in tomato (Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004). We note however, that nodulation occurs in environmental conditions where N is limiting; indeed, our laboratory conditions for nodulation occur in N starvation. We supply 0 μM NO3− during nodulation and only the trace NO3−, expected to be in the μM range, present as contaminants in nutrient media and glassware are available. If NO3− is supplied to dividing nodule cells, it must come from seed NO3− stores, which should be close to depleted by the time nodules are forming or be re-mobilized from other N-rich components within the plant. Another possibility is that MtNIP/LATD NO3− transport could participate in a proposed NO3−—NO respiration pathway in nodules (Horchani et al., 2011; Meilhoc et al., 2011). There are several observations that argue against this: Mtnip-3, with functional NO3− transport (FIG. 4), has abnormal nodules (Teillet et al., 2008); MtNIP/LATD's promoter is active in nodule meristems and in the invasion zone and not in the N-fixing zone (Yendrek et al., 2010), suggesting that MtNIP/LATD may be absent in the N-fixing zone; and the heterologous MtNIP/LATD expression experiments suggest direction of NO3− transport is towards the cytosol, which is opposite to that suggested for a NO3− transporter in the proposed NO3−—NO pathway.
Because MtNIP/LATD has another function besides NO3− transport, it is plausible that the other function is responsible for some of the Mtnip/latd mutants' phenotypes. Here, we have presented data suggesting that neither histidine nor dicarboxylates are substrates for MtNIP/LATD transport (Suppl. Table 1 and Suppl. FIG. 3). We and others have speculated that MtNIP/LATD may be a NO3− transceptor or sensor (Harris and Dickstein, 2010; Yendrek et al., 2010; Gojon et al., 2011). If it is a NO3− transceptor or sensor, we predict that it may be responsible for high-affinity NO3− sensing. This is because it is a high-affinity transporter and because the root architecture phenotypes are partially rescued by high, but not low NO3− concentrations (FIG. 2). It is also possible that MtNIP/LATD is able to transport a hormone like AtNRT1.1 (Krouk et al., 2010) and AtNRT1.2 (Kanno et al., 2012), and that is responsible for the other function(s) of MtNIP/LATD.
Materials and Methods
Plant Growth Conditions.
M. truncatula A17 (wild-type) and nodulation mutants were grown in aeroponic chambers with Lullien media (Lullien et al., 1987), starved for nitrogen for five days and inoculated with S. medicae strain ABS7 (Bekki et al., 1987) or S. meliloti strain Rm2011 (Rosenberg et al., 1981) harboring pXLGD4 (Boivin et al., 1990; Penmetsa and Cook, 1997) as previously described (Veereshlingam et al., 2004; Pislariu and Dickstein, 2007). For experiments where Medicago plants were grown in the presence of N sources, the relevant N sources were added to Lullien media from the beginning of the experiment and inoculations were done with ABS7/pXLDG4. At 15 dpi, plants were stained with X-Gal to identify nodules. Arabidopsis plants were grown as described (Srivastava et al., 2008) at 22 C with a 16:8 light:dark light regime.
Nitrate Uptake Studies in Medicago. 
A17, Mtnip-1, and Mtnip-3 seedlings were surface sterilized, germinated and placed on buffered nodulation media (BNM) (Ehrhardt et al., 1992) solidified with agar, pH 5.8, supplemented with 5 mM NH4NO3 and grown for 7 days at 22 C with a 16:8 light:dark light regime, with roots shielded from the light. Plants were transferred to nitrogen-free BNM agar and grown for three days to starve them for nitrogen. Plants were placed in liquid BNM media supplemented with either 250 μM or 5 mM KNO3. Samples from the media were collected at the indicated times and assayed for NO3− using the Cayman (Ann Arbor, Mich., #780001) NO3−/NO2− assay kit following manufacturer's instructions.
Construction of Oocyte Expression Vectors.
RNA was extracted from M. truncatula A17 plants and mutant Mtnip-1, Mtlatd and Mtnip-3 using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, Md.). First strand cDNA was transcribed using oligo dT and Superscript IIITM reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and the wild-type MtNIP/LATD and mutant Mtnip/latd cDNAs were made using MtNIP/LATD specific primers NIPcEXP1R, NIPcExp1F and NIPcDNANhel_F (Suppl. Table 2) via PCR with PhusionTM high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.). The resulting 1776 bp cDNAs were cloned into transcription vectors pSP64T (Krieg and Melton, 1984) and pcDNATM3.1(−) (Invitrogen). AtNRT1.1 cDNA was amplified from pMS008 (see below) using primers Chl_1F and Chl_1R, cloned into PCR8/GW/TOPO, and then moved into pOO2/GW (gift from Dr. John Ward) downstream of an SP6 promoter. All clones were verified by DNA sequencing.
Binary Vectors.
MtNIP/LATD cDNA was amplified with NIPC2F and NIPCODBst1R, digested with NcoI and BstEII and ligated into a vector containing the AtEF1α promoter engineered to contain a 5′ BamHI site and a 3′ NcoI site, making a precise translational fusion, creating pMS004. Subsequently the AtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD cDNA fragment was cloned into the BamHI and BstEII site of binary vector pCAMBIA2301. AtNRT1.1 cDNA was amplified from total cDNA made from wild-type Col-0 Arabidopsis mRNA using primers CHL11F and CHL11R, digested with BspHI and BstEII and cloned into NcoI and BstEII digested pMS004 to obtain pMS008. The pAtEF1α-AtNRT1.1 fragment was then subcloned into the BamHI and BstEII sites of pCAMBIA2301. For the pMtNIP/LATD-MtNIP/LATD construct, the pAtEF1α in pMS004 was replaced by 3 kbp upstream region of MtNIP/LATD amplified using NIP10F and NIP P1R primers, followed by EcoR1 and NcoI/BspHI digestion to create the pMS006 clone. Then the pMS006 EcoRI/BstEII fragment was moved into the EcoRI/BstEII site of pCAMBIA2301. AgDCAT1 cDNA was PCR amplified from pJET1.2-AgDC471 (gift of Dr. K. Pawlowski) using DC-BgIII and DC NheI primers and cloned into the BamHI and NheI sites of pMS014 vector, a vector containing the MtNIP/LATD promoter only, to create pMS015. Then the pMS015 EcoRI/BstEII fragment was moved into the EcoRI/BstEII site of pCAMBIA2301 to create the pMtNIP/LATD-AgDCAT1 construct. FIG. 15 shows the primer sequences.
Nitrate and Histidine Uptake in Xenopus laevis Oocytes.
Capped mRNA was transcribed in vitro from linearized plasmid using SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase (mMESSAGE mMACHINE, Ambion, Austin, Tex.). Collagenase treated oocytes were isolated and microinjected with approximately 50 ng RNA in 50 nl sterile H2O. Oocytes microinjected with 50 nl sterile H2O were used as negative controls. Oocytes were incubated in ND96 solution (Liu and Tsay, 2003) for 24-40 h at 18 C. For NO3− uptake, ooctyes were incubated in a solution containing 230 mM mannitol, 15 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), containing various KNO3 concentrations at pH 5.5 or 7.4, at 16 C for the indicated times. After incubation, batches of four to six oocytes were lysed in 40 μL H2O, centrifuged at 13,500×g for 20 min and the supernatant analyzed for NO3− content, as above. For histidine uptake, oocytes were incubated in ND96 media pH 5.5 at 25 C containing 1 mM uniformly 13C-labeled histidine (Cambridge Isotope, Andover, Mass.). After incubation, oocytes were washed five times with the same medium containing 10 mM unlabeled histidine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) and batches of eight oocytes were lysed in 100 μL H2O and centrifuged at 13,500×g for 20 min. The supernatant was concentrated into 15 μL using a lyophilizer and analyzed using ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS).
UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis.
13C6-histidine was quantified using a precolumn derivatization method with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC) combined with UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. AQC derivatization was performed using the AccQ·Tag derivatization kit (Waters Corp., Milford, Mass.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis was carried out on a Waters Acquity UPLC system interfaced to a Waters Xevo TQ mass spectrometer as described (Salazar et al., 2012). Briefly, the AQC derivatized 13C6-histidine was separated on a Waters AccQ·Tag Ultra column (2.1 mm i.d.×100 mm, 1.7 μm particles) using AccQ·Tag Ultra eluents (Waters Corp.) and gradient described earlier (Salazar et al., 2012). The sample injection volume was 1 μL, the UPLC column flow rate was 0.7 mL/min, and the column temperature was 55 C. Mass spectra were acquired using positive electrospray ionization and the multiple reaction monitoring mode, with the following ionization source settings: capillary voltage, 1.99 kV (ESI+); desolvation temperature, 650 C; desolvation gas flow rate, 1000 L/h; source temperature, 150° C. Argon was used as collision gas at a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min. The collision energy (CE) and cone voltage (CV) were optimized for 13C6-histidine using the IntelliStart software (CE=26 eV; CV=20 V). The most sensitive parent-daughter ion transition of derivatized histidine (m/z 332.1>171.0) was selected for quantitation. The mass spectrometer response was calibrated by injecting AQC-derivatized-13C6-histidine standard solutions of known concentration. The UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system control and data acquisition were performed with Waters Corp. MassLynxTM software. Data analysis was conducted with TargetLynxTM software (Waters Corp.).
Transformation of Atchl1-5 Plants with MtNIP/LATD Expression Construct.
MtNIP/LATD expression construct (pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD) was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90) strain by electroporation. Positive colonies were selected by colony PCR, verified by restriction digestion, and transformed into Atchl1-5 mutant (Tsay et al., 1993) by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Seeds were collected and transformed plants were selected on kanamycin media. Two independent homozygous transformed lines of Atchl1-5 transformed with pAtEF1α-MtNIP/LATD were selected.
Chlorate Sensitivity Test.
Plants were grown in vermiculite:perlite (1:1 mixture) under continuous illumination at 25-27 C. Plants were irrigated every 2-3 d with medium containing 10 mM KH2PO4 (pH 5.3), 5 mM KNO3, 2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM FeEDTA, 50 pM H3BO3, 12 pM MnSO4, 1 pM ZnCl, 1 pM CuSO4, and 0.2 pM Na2MoO4. At 5-7 d post germination, plants were irrigated twice with media containing 2 mM NaClO3, without NO3−. Three days after ClO3− treatment, plants were switched to irrigation media lacking ClO3− and NO3−. Plants were examined 7-10 d after ClO3− treatment for necrosis and bleaching symptoms characteristic of chlorate toxicity (Wilkinson and Crawford, 1991), and their fresh weight and chlorophyll contents were obtained. Digital color photographs of the plants were obtained, corrected for color balance (Suppl. FIG. 2), converted to grayscale and corrected for contrast (FIG. 5) using the auto-contrast features of Photoshop (Adobe Software).
Chlorophyll content was determined from approximately 10 mg fresh leaves that were weighed, frozen in liquid N2, ground to fine powder, added to tubes with 100 μL H2O and 8 mL 96% ethanol and mixed. The tubes were kept at 25 C overnight, mixed again and the particulates allowed to settle. The absorbance was recorded at 648.6 nm and 664.2 nm. Total chlorophyll was calculated as described (Lichtenthaler, 1987).
Medicago Hairy Root Transformation by Expression Constructs.
Vectors containing the expression constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium rhizogenes ARqua1 strain (Quandt et al., 1993) and A. tumefaciens MSU440 by the freeze thaw method (Hofgen and Willmitzer, 1988). Positive ARqual colonies were transformed into Mtnip-1 and A17 plants by the needle poking method (Mortier et al., 2010). Transformed composite plants were grown as previously described (Pislariu and Dickstein, 2007).
Analysis of Lateral Root and Nodules in Transformed Plants.
Root nodules were analyzed at 12 dpi. After visual inspection, they were stained with X-GAL for lacZ, present in pXLGD4 plasmid in S. medicae ABS7. Subsequently, the nodules were mounted in 2.5% LMP agarose and 50 μm sections were obtained using a 1000 Plus Vibratome (Vibratome, Bannockburn, Ill.) and observed by light microscopy. Lateral roots were inspected visually and under a dissecting microscope.
Example 7
Arabidopsis is a genus in the family Brassicaceae. They are small flowering plants related to cabbage and mustard. This genus is of great interest since it contains thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana), one of the model organisms used for studying plant biology and the first plant to have its entire genome sequenced. Meristems are the adult body of vascular plants is the result of meristematic activity. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, plant meristems are centers of mitotic cell division, and are composed of a group of undifferentiated self-renewing stem cells from which most plant structures arise. Apical meristems are located at the growing tips of the adult plant, and produce root and shoot tissue. Shoot apical meristems (SAM) (2105) initiate leaves during vegetative development, and inflorescence (IM) (2110) and floral meristems (FM) (2120) during reproductive development.
Turning to FIG. 21 showing Arabidopsis wild type plants (2101) and plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD (2102) about 40 days after germination and grown without supplemental nitrogen fertilizer. Panel A shows a top view and side view of the wild-type non-transformed control plants, represented as Arabidopsis Col-0. Panel B shows top view and side view of the Arabidopsis Col-0 plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD, using the constitutive AtEF1αpromoter. The IM (2110) and FM (2120) are found in 40 day old plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD, but not in wild type plants. The side view clearly shows white flower stalks on most of the plants in Panel B, in contrast to the absence of such flowers in Panel A.
Turning to FIG. 22 showing Arabidopsis plants transformed with both missense alleles of MtNIP/LATD, in order to correlate ability of their encoded proteins to transport nitrate with function in promoting growth. Panel A shows the top and side view of Arabidopsis Col-0 plants constitutively expressing Mtnip-3 (2201), using the constitutive AtEF1α-promoter, wherein Mtnip-3 transports nitrate in Xenopus oocytes and causes larger plants that flower earlier. The Arabidopsis Col-0 plants constitutively expressing Mtnip-1 (2202), using the constitutive AtEF1αpromoter. Mtnip-1 does not transport nitrate in Xenopus oocytes and does not cause larger plants that flower earlier.
The constitutive expression of the Arabidopsis NRT1.1 gene was tested using the same constitutive AtEF1α promoter. More specifically, FIG. 23 shows the effects of expressing an Arabidopsis NRT1.1 gene that encodes a dual affinity nitrate transporter, which is capable of transporting nitrate with both high and low affinity. It has also been shown to transport nitrate.
Turning now to FIG. 23, Panel A shows the Arabidopsis Col-0 plants (2301) constitutively expressing AtNRT1.1, using the constitutive AtEF1α promoter. The NRT1.1 is capable of transporting nitrate in Xenopus oocytes. Expression of AtNRT1.1 causes slightly larger plants and several of the plants flower earlier. Additionally, two other species have shown similar results. For example, Medicago truncatula plants having about the same age in the T1 generations are shown in FIG. 23 Panel B, wherein the two plants on the left (2330) are Medicago truncatula plants constitutively expressing MtNIP'LATD, and the plant on the right (2340) is also transformed, but is expressing an unrelated gene, GUS.
Example 8
Medicago truncatula (Barrel Medic or Barrel Medick or Barrel Clover) is a small legume native to the Mediterranean region. It is a low-growing, clover-like plant 10-60 cm tall with trifoliate leaves. Each leaflet is rounded, 1-2 cm long, often with a dark spot in the center. Generally, the flowers are yellow, produced singly or in a small inflorescence of 2-5 together; the fruit is a small spiny pod. Turning now to FIG. 24, Panel A, shows the M. truncatula plants transformed with a control GUS construct, wherein the figure shows the plants (2410) are not flowering. In contrast, FIG. 24 Panel B are M. truncatula plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD flower sooner (2420). As indicated, the M. truncatula plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD flower sooner when compared to the control plants transformed with the GUS construct.
Example 9
Tobacco is an agricultural product processed from the leaves of plants in the genus Nicotiana. It can be consumed, used as a pesticide and, in the form of nicotine tartrate, used in some medicines. It is most commonly used as a drug, and is a valuable cash crop for countries such as Cuba, India, China, and the United States. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, tobacco is a name for any plant of the genus Nicotiana of the Solanaceae family (nightshade family) and for the product manufactured from the leaf and used in cigars and cigarettes, snuff, and pipe and chewing tobacco. Tobacco plants are also used in plant bioengineering, and some of the 60 species are grown as ornamentals. The chief commercial species, N. tabacum, is believed native to tropical America, like most nicotiana plants, but has been so long cultivated that it is no longer known in the wild. N. rustica, a mild-flavored, fast-burning species, was the tobacco originally raised in Virginia, but it is now grown chiefly in Turkey, India, and Russia. The alkaloid nicotine is the most characteristic constituent of tobacco and is responsible for its addictive nature. Tobacco was also utilized as a plant for expressing the MtNIP/LATD gene. More specifically, FIG. 25 shows a top view (Panel A) and side view (Panel B) of a side-by-side comparisons, wherein the tobacco plants transformed with the construct containing a constitutive promoter driving MtNIP/LATD (2510) are larger than tobacco plants transformed with the GUS gene (2520).
Example 10
The growth phenotype of the Arabidopsis plants was determined when the plants are treated to different nitrate conditions. Experiments that compare wild type and transgenic plants treated with various low nitrate concentrations of 100-200 μM KNO3, indicate that the Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD are larger than control plants. Additionally, high nitrate concentration, 10 mM KNO3, indicate that the control plants are comparable in size to the plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, these experiment indicate that plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD will do better in nitrogen poor environments when compared to non-transgenic plants.
Although not wanting to be bound by theory, the differences in growth may be due to a cascade change in gene regulation. For example, comparison of gene expression/regulation using an Affymetrix gene chip analysis for the Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing MtNIP/LATD grown at 100 μM KNO3 compared to the same plants grown at 10 mM KNO3 and found that the plants expressing MtNIP/LATD have about 35 mis-regulated genes. In contrast, non-transgenic control plants grown under similar conditions show over 1,000 mis-regulated genes using the Affymetrix gene chip analysis.
Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is possible that an increase in production of nodules could be linked to the growth changes observed in wildtype plants and plants constitutively expressing MTNIP/LATD. More specifically, FIG. 26 shows the nodules (2601) in a M. Truncatula plant can be observed in several areas of the root system of the plant. FIG. 26 indicates at least three nodule areas including: A primary nodulation zone (2610); A Lateral Root Nodule Zone (2620); and a secondary nodulation Zone (2630).
M. truncatula plants that constitutively express MtNIP/LATD are able to produce more nodules per plant when compared to control plants. More specifically. FIG. 27 shows that transgenic plants grown in the absence of KNO3 have about twice as many nodules when compared to non-transgenic plants (2710). In the presence of a low concentration of about 0.2 mM KNO3, the transgenic plants still retain about twice the number of nodules when compared to a non-transgenic plant, wherein the number of nodules is about one-fifth less than transgenic plants grown with 0 mM KNO3 (2720). In contrast, the increase in nodule number almost disappears when both plants are grown in higher concentrations (i.e.  ̃1.0 mM of KNO3) (2730).
Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is not known if the plants having more nodules actually fix more nitrogen. The nodules were counted at 15 days post-inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti. It has been observed upon close examination of the plants that the extra nodules are located the secondary nodulation zone, and on the lateral roots, areas that normally have fewer nodules under our growing conditions. More specifically, FIG. 28 compares the nodule number in the Primary zone when plants are grown in 0.0 mm, 0.20 mM; and 1.0 mM of KNO3. The graph in FIG. 28 indicates that as the concentration of KNO3 increases, the number of nodules in the primary zone of both the transgenic and non-transgenic plants decrease about 50%. Moreover, the number of nodules are almost equal when comparing transgenic plants to non-transgenic plants grown at higher concentrations of KNO3. Additionally, it appears that the plants and the plant roots are still about the same size as control plants not expressing MtNIP/LATD.
Extra nodules located the secondary nodulation zone have been observed in the transgenic plants. Additionally, the secondary nodulation zone and lateral roots areas normally have fewer nodules under the specified growing conditions. More specifically, FIG. 29 compares the nodule number in the secondary nodulation zone when plants are grown in 0.0 mm, 0.20 mM; and 1.0 mM of KNO3. The M. truncatula plants that constitutively express MtNIP/LATD are able to produce more nodules in the secondary zone when compared to control plants. More specifically, FIG. 29 shows that transgenic plants grown in the absence of KNO3 have about twice as many nodules when compared to non-transgenic plants (2810). In the presence of a low concentration of about 0.2 mM KNO3, the transgenic plants still retain about twice the number of nodules when compared to a non-transgenic plant, wherein the number of nodules is about one-fifth less than transgenic plants grown with 0 mM KNO3 (2720). In contrast, the increase in nodule number almost disappears when both plants are grown in higher concentrations (i.e.  ̃1.0 mM of KNO3) (2930).
An increased number of nodules located the lateral roots was observed in the transgenic plants. More specifically. FIG. 30 compares the nodule number in the lateral roots when plants are grown in 0.0 mm, 0.20 mM; and 1.0 mM of KNO3. The M. trancatula plants that constitutively express MtNIP/LATD are able to produce and maintain more nodules in the lateral roots when compared to control plants. More specifically, FIG. 29 shows that transgenic plants grown in the absence of KNO3 have about three as many nodules when compared to non-transgenic plants (2910). In the presence of a low concentration of about 0.2 mM KNO3, the transgenic plants still retain about three times the number of nodules when compared to a non-transgenic plant (2920). In contrast with the other nodulation zones, the lateral roots maintain the three fold increase in nodules in the lateral roots even when both plants are grown in higher concentrations of KNO3 (i.e.  ̃1.0 mM) (2930). However, the total number of nodes in the lateral roots is about 3-fold less when plants are grown in 1.0 mM KNO3 compared to zero KNO3.
Additionally, FIG. 31 shows that MtNIP/LATD overexpressing lines have more lateral roots in zero or low (0.2 mM KNO3), but this difference disappears in the presence of 1 mM KNO3.
REFERENCES CITED
The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.

    Abogadallah G M, Nada R M, Malinowski R, Quick P (2011) Overexpression of HARDY, an AP2/ERF gene from Arabidopsis, improves drought and salt tolerance by reducing transpiration and sodium uptake in transgenic Trifolium alexandrinum L. Planta 233: 1265-1276
    Auriac M-C, Timmers A C J (2007) Nodulation studies in the model legume Medicago truncatula: Advantages of using the constitutive EF1 a promoter and limitations in detecting fluorescent reporter proteins in nodule tissues. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 20: 1040-1047
    Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma K K (2008) Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Reports 27: 411-424
    Bright L. Liang Y, Mitchell D M, Harris J M (2005) LATD, a gene required for both nodule and root development. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 521-532 Gonzalez N, Beemster G T, Inze D (2009) David and Goliath: what can the tiny weed Arabidopsis teach us to improve biomass production in crops? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12: 157-164
    Fan X, Yan M, Tang Z, Feng H, Miller T, Shen Q, Xu G Engineering rice nitrate transporters to improve N use efficiency
    Flavell R (2005) Model plants, with special emphasis on Arabidopsis thaliana, and crop improvement. In R Tuberosa, R L Phillips, M Gale, eds. Proceedings of the International Congress In the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution, 27-31 May 2003, Bologna, Italy. Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy, pp 365-378
    Gao S, Zhang H, Tian Y. Li F, Zhang Z. Lu X, Chen X, Huang R (2008) Expression of TERF1 in rice regulates expression of stress-responsive genes and enhances tolerance to drought and high-salinity. Plant Cell Rep. 27: 1787-1795
    Gonzalez N, De Bodt S, Sulpice R, Jikumaru Y, Chae E, Dhondt S, Van Daele T, De Milde L, Weigel D, Kamiya Y, Stitt M, Beemster G T S, Inze D (2010) Increased leaf size: Different means to an end. Plant Physiology 153: 1261-1279
    Ho C-H, Lin S-H, Hu H-C, Tsay Y-F (2009) CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell 138: 1184-1194
    Huang N-C, Chiang C-S, Crawford N M, Tsay Y-F (1996) CHL1 encodes a component of the low-affinity nitrate uptake system in Arabidopsis and shows cell type-specific expression in roots. Plant Cell 8: 2183-2191
    Hussain S S, Kayani M A, Amjad M (2011) Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnology Progress 27: 297-306
    Jeong J, Suh S, Guan C, Tsay Y-F. Moran N, Jae Oh C, An C-S, Demchenko K N, Pawlowski K, Lee Y (2004) A nodule-specific dicarboxylate transporter from alder is a member of the peptide transporter family. Plant Physiology 134: 969-978
    Jin T, Chang Q, Li W, Yin D, Li Z, Wang D, Liu B, Liu L (2010) Stress-inducible expression of GmDREB1 conferred salt tolerance in transgenic alfalfa. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100: 219-227
    Katayama H, Mori M, Kawamura Y, Tanaka T, Mori M, Hasegawa H (2009) Production and characterization of transgenic plants carrying a high-affinity nitrate transporter gene (OsNRT2.1) Breeding Science 59:237-243
    Krizek B A (2009) Making bigger plants: key regulators of final organ size. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12: 17-22
    Krouk G, Lacombe B, Bielach A, Perrine-Walker F, Malinska K, Mounier E, Hoyerova K, Tillard P, Leon S, Ljung K, Zazimalova E, Benkova E, Nacry P, Gojon A (2010) Nitrate-Regulated Auxin Transport by NRT1.1 Defines a Mechanism for Nutrient Sensing in Plants. Developmental Cell 18: 927-937
    Liu K-H, Huang C-Y, Tsay Y-F (1999) CHL1 is a dual affinity nitrate transporter of Arabidopsis involved in multiple phases of nitrate uptake. Plant Cell 11
    Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, Tran L S, Nguyen H T (2009) Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant and Cell Physiology 50: 1260-1276
    NSF (2002) Beyond the Whole Genome Sequence. In. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Va. nsf.gov/pubs/2002/bio0202/model.htm
    Teillet A, Garcia J, de Billy F. Gherardi M, Huguet T, Barker D G, de Carvalho-Niebel F, Journet E-P (2008) api, a novel Medicago truncatula symbiotic mutant impaired in nodule primordium invasion. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 21: 535-546
    Tsay Y-F, Chiu C-C, Tsai C-B, Ho C-H, Hsu P-K (2007) Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters. FEBS Letters 581 2290-2300
    Tsay Y-F, Schroeder J I, Feldmann K A, Crawford N M (1993) The herbicide sensitivity gene CHL1 of Arabidopsis encodes a nitrate-inducible nitrate transporter. Cell 72: 705-713
    Valente M A S, Faria J A Q A, Soares-Ramos J R L, Reis P A B, Pinheiro G L, Piovesan N D, Morais A T, Menezes C C, Cano M A O, Fietto L G, Loureiro M E, Aragão F J L, Fontes E P B (2009) The ER luminal binding protein (BiP) mediates an increase in drought tolerance in soybean and delays drought-induced leaf senescence in soybean and tobacco. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 533-546
    Veereshlingam H. Haynes J G, Sherrier D J, Penmetsa R V, Cook D R, Dickstein R (2004) nip, a symbiotic Medicago truncatula mutant that forms root nodules with aberrant infection threads and plant defense-like response. Plant Physiol. 136: 3692-3702
    Wang R, Liu D, Crawford N M (1998) The Arabidopsis CHL protein plays a major role in high-affinity nitrate uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15134-15139
    Wang R, Xing X, Wang Y, Tran A, Crawford N M (2009) A genetic screen for nitrate regulatory mutants captures the nitrate transporter gene NRT1.1. Plant Physiology 151: 72-478
    Ware D, Stein L (2003) Comparison of genes among cereals. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 121-127
    Yendrek C R, Lee Y-C, Morris V, Liang Y. Pislariu C I, Burkart G, Meckfessel M H, Salehin M, Kessler H, Wessler H, Lloyd M. Lutton H, Teillet A, Sherrier D J, Journet E-P, Harris J M, Dickstein R (2010) A putative transporter is essential for integrating nutrient and hormone signaling with lateral root growth and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. The Plant Journal 62: 100-112
    Zhang H, Liu W, Wan L, Li F, Dai L, Li D, Zhang Z, Huang R (2010) Functional analyses of ethylene response factor JERF3 with the aim of improving tolerance to drought and osmotic stress in transgenic rice. Transgenic Res 19: 809-818
    Zhang J Z. Creelman R A, Zhu J-K (2004) Froml aboratory to field. Using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiology 135: 615-621
    Zhang Z, Huang R (2010) Enhanced tolerance to freezing in tobacco and tomato overexpressing transcription factor TERF2, LeERF2 is modulated by ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Molecular Biology 73: 241-249
    Zhang Z, Li F, Li D. Zhang H. Huang R (2010) Expression of ethylene response factor JERF1 in rice improves tolerance to drought. Planta 232: 765-774


LITERATURE CITED


    Almagro A, Lin S H, Tsay Y-F (2008) Characterization of the Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT1.6 reveals a role of nitrate in early embryo development. Plant Cell: doi/10.1105/tpc.1107.056788
    Barbier-Brygoo H. De Angeli A. Filleur S, Frachisse J-M, Gambale F, Thomine S, Wege S (2011) Anion channels/transporters in plants: From molecular bases to regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62: 25-51
    Bekki A, Trinchant J-C, Rigaud J (1987) Nitrogen fixation (C2H2 reduction) by Medicago nodules and bacteroids under sodium chloride stress. Physiol. Plant 71: 61-67
    Benedito V A, Li H, Dai X, Wandrey M, He J, Kaundal R, Torres-Jerez I, Gomez S K, Harrison M J, Tang Y, Zhao P X, Udvardi M K (2010) Genomic inventory and transcriptional analysis of Medicago truncatula transporters. Plant Physiology 152: 1716-1730
    Boisson-Dernier A, Chabaud M, Garcia F, Becard G, Rosenberg C, Barker D G (2001) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Medicago truncatula for the study of nitrogen-fixing and endomycorrhizal symbiotic associations. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 14: 695-700
    Boivin C, Camut S, Malpica C A, Truchet G, Rosenberg C (1990) Rhizobium meliloti genes encoding catabolism of trigonelline are induced under symbiotic conditions. Plant Cell 2: 1157-1170
    Bright L, Liang Y, Mitchell D M, Harris J M (2005) LATD, a gene required for both nodule and root development. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 521-532
    Clough S J, Bent A F (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal 16: 735-743
    Correa-Aragunde N, Graziano M, Lamattina L (2004) Nitric oxide plays a central ole in determining lateral root development in tomato. Planta 218: 900-905
    Crawford N M (1995) Nitrate: nutrient and signal for plant growth. Plant Cell 7: 859-868
    del Giudice J, Cam Y. Damiani I, Fung-Chat F, Meilhoc E, Bruand C, Brouquisse R, Puppo A, Boscari A (2011) Nitric oxide is required for an optimal establishment of the Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. New Phytologist 191: 405 117
    Doddema H. Hofstra J J, Feenstra W J (1978) Uptake of nitrate by mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, disturbed in uptake or reduction of nitrate. Physiol. Plant 43: 343-350
    Ehrhardt D W, Atkinson E M, Long S R (1992) Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors. Science 256 998-1000
    Fan S-C, Lin C-S, Hsua P-K, Lin S-H, Tsay Y-F (2009) The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT1.7, expressed in phloem, is responsible for source-to-sink remobilization of nitrate. The Plant Cell 21: 2750-2761
    Fei H. Vessey J K (2008) Stimulation of nodulation in Medicago truncatula by low concentrations of ammonium: quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis of selected genes. Physiologia Plantarum 135: 317-330
    Gojon A, Krouk G, Perrine-Walker F, Laugier E (2011) Nitrate transceptor(s) in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 2299-2308
    Harris J M, Dickstein R (2010) Control of root architecture and nodulation by the LATDAVIP transporter. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5: 1386-1390
    Ho C-H, Lin S-H, Hu H-C, Tsay Y-F (2009) CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell 138: 1184-1194
    Hofgen R, Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucl. Acids Res. 16: 9877
    Horchani F, Prevot M, Boscari A, Evangelisti E, Meilhoc E, Bruand C, Raymond P, Boncompagni E, Aschi-Smiti S, Puppo A, Brouquisse R (2011) Both plant and bacterial nitrate reductases contribute to nitric oxide production in Medicago truncatula nitrogen-fixing nodules. Plant Physiology 155: 1023-1036
    Huang N-C, Chiang C-S, Crawford N M, Tsay Y-F (1996) CHL1 encodes a component of the low-affinity nitrate uptake system in Arabidopsis and shows cell type-specific expression in roots. Plant Cell 8: 2183-2191
    Jeong J, Suh S, Guan C, Tsay Y-F, Moran N, Jae Oh C, An C-S, Demchenko K N, Pawlowski K, Lee Y (2004) A nodule-specific dicarboxylate transporter from alder is a member of the peptide transporter family. Plant Physiology 134: 969-978
    Kanno Y. Hanada A, Chiba Y, Ichikawa T. Nakazawa M, Matsui M, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y. Seo M (2012) Identification of an abscisic acid transporter by functional screening using the receptor complex as a sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 9653-9658
    Kouchi H, Imaizumi-Anraku H, Hayashi M, Hakoyama T, Nakagawa T, Umehara Y, Suganuma N, Kawaguchi M (2010) How many peas in a pod? Legume genes responsible for mutualistic symbioses underground. Plant Cell Physiology 51: 1381-1397
    Krieg P A, Melton D A (1984) Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6 in vitro transcription of cloned cDNAs. Nucl. Acids Res. 12: 7057-7070
    Krouk G, Crawford N M, Coruzzi G M, Tsay Y F (2010) Nitrate signaling: adaptation to fluctuating environments. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 266-273
    Krouk G, Lacombe B, Bielach A, Perrine-Walker F, Malinska K, Mounier E, Hoyerova K, Tillard P, Leon S, Ljung K, Zazimalova E, Benkova E, Nacry P, Gojon A (2010) Nitrate-Regulated Auxin Transport by NRT1.1 Defines a Mechanism for Nutrient Sensing in Plants. Developmental Cell 18: 927-937
    Li J-Y, Fu Y-L, Pike S M, Bao J, Tian W, Zhang Y, Chen C-Z, Zhang Y, Li H-M, Huang J, Li L-G, Schroeder J I, Gassmann W, Gong J-M (2010) The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT1.8 functions in nitrate removal from the xylem sap and mediates cadmium tolerance. Plant Cell 22: 1633-1646
    Liang Y, Harris J M (2005) Response of root branching to abscisic acid is correlated with nodule formation both in legumes and non-legumes. American Journal of Botany 92: 1675-1683
    Liang Y, Mitchell D M, Harris J M (2007) Abscisic acid rescues the root meristem defects of the Medicago truncatula laid mutant. Developmental Biology 304 297-307
    Lichtenthaler H K (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148: 350-382
    Lin S-H, Kuo H-F, Canivenc G, Lin C-S, Lepetit M, Hsu P-K, Tillard P. Lin H-L, Wang Y-Y, Tsai C-B, Gojon A, Tsay Y-F (2008) Mutation of the Arabidopsis NRT1.5 nitrate transporter causes defective root-to-shoot nitrate transport. Plant Cell 20: 2514-2528
    Linkohr B I, Williamson L C, Fitter A H, Leyser H M O (2002) Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 29: 751-760
    Liu K-H, Tsay Y-F (2003) Switching between the two action modes of the dual-affinity nitrate transporter CHL1 by phosphorylation. EMBO Journal 22: 1005-1013
    Liu K-H, Tsay Y-F (2003) Switching between the two action modes of the dual-affinity nitrate transporter CHL1 by phosphorylation. EMBO Journal 22: 1005-1013
    Lullien V, Barker D G, de Lajudie P. Huguet T (1987) Plant gene expression in effective and ineffective root nodules of alfalfa (Medicago saliva). Plant Molecular Biology 9: 469-478
    Meilhoc E, Boscari A, Bruand C, Puppo A, Brouquisse R (2011) Nitric oxide in legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Science 181: 573-581
    Miller A J, Fan X, Orsel M, Smith S J, Wells D M (2007) Nitrate transport and signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 2297-2306
    Miranda M, Borisjuk L, Tewes A, Dietrich D, Rentsch D, Weber H, Wobus U (2003) Peptide and amino acid transporters are differentially regulated during seed development and germination in faba bean. Plant Physiology 132: 1950-1960
    Morere-Le Paven M-C, Viau L, Hamon A, Vandecasteele C, Pellizzaro A, Bourdin C, Laffont C, Lapied B, Lepetit M, Frugier F, Legros C, Limami A M (2011) Characterization of a dual-affinity nitrate transporter MtNRT1.3 in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 5595-5605
    Mortier V, Den Herder G, Whitford R, Van de Velde W, Rombauts S, D'haeseleer K, Holsters M, Goormachtig S (2010) CLE peptides control Medicago truncatula nodulation locally and systemically. Plant Physiology 153: 222-237
    Munos S, Cazettes C, Fizames C, Gaymard F, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Lejay L, Gojon A (2004) Transcript profiling in the chl1-5 mutant of Arabidopsis reveals a role of the nitrate transporter NRT1.1 in the regulation of another nitrate transporter, NRT2.1. Plant Cell 16: 2433-2447
    Oldroyd G E D, Downie J A (2008) Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59 519-546
    Penmetsa R V, Cook D R (1997) A legume ethylene-insensitive mutant hyperinfected by Its rhizobial symbiont. Science 275: 527-530
    Pislariu C I, Dickstein R (2007) An IRE-like AGC Kinase Gene, MtIRE, has unique expression in the invasion zone of developing root nodules in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiology 144: 682-694
    Quandt H J, Puhler A, Broer I (1993) Transgenic root nodules of Vicki hirsuta: A fast and efficient system for the study of gene expression in indeterminate-type nodules. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 6: 699-706
    Remans T, Nacry P, Pervent M, Filleur S, Diatloff E, Mounier E, Tillard P, Forde B G, Gojon A (2006) The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 transporter participates in the signaling pathway triggering root colonization of nitrate-rich patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 19206-19211
    Rosenberg C, Boistard P, Denarie J, Casse-Delbart F (1981) Genes controlling early and late functions in symbiosis are located on a megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti. Molecular and General Genetics 184: 326-333
    Salazar C, Armenta J M, Cortes D F, Shulaev V (2012) Combination of an AccQ-Tag-Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method with Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Amino Acids. In MA Alterman, P Hunziker, eds, Amino Acid Analysis: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol 828. Humana Press, pp 13-28
    Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, Nakao M, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Ono A, Kawashima K, Fujishiro T, Katoh M, Kohara M, Kishida Y, Minami C, Nakayama S, Nakazaki N, Shimizu Y, Shinpo S, Takahashi C, Wada T, Yamada M, Ohmido N, Hayashi M, Fukui K, Baba T, Nakamichi T, Mori H, Tabata S (2008) Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Research 15: 227-239
    Schmutz J, Cannon S B, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten D L, Song Q, Thelen J J, Cheng J, Xu D, Hellsten U, May G D, Yu Y, Sakurai T, Umezawa T, Bhattacharyya M K, Sandhu D, Valliyodan B, Lindquist E, Peto M, Grant D, Shu S, Goodstein D, Barry K, Futrell-Griggs M, Abernathy B, Du J, Tian Z, Zhu L. Gill N, Joshi T, Libault M, Sethuraman A, Zhang X-C, Shinozaki K, Nguyen H T, Wing R A, Cregan P, Specht J, Grimwood J, Rokhsar D, Stacey G, Shoemaker R C, Jackson S A (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463: 178-183
    Segonzac C, Boyer J-C, Ipotesi E, Szponarski W, Tillard P, Touraine B, Sommerer N, Rossignol M, Gibrata R (2007) Nitrate efflux at the root plasma membrane: Identification of an Arabidopsis excretion transporter. Plant Cell 19: 3760-3777
    Srivastava A C, Ganesan S, Ismail I O, Ayre B G (2008) Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis AtSUC2 sucrose/H+ symporter by tissue-specific complementation reveals an essential role in phloem loading but not in long-distance transport. Plant Physiology 148: 200-211
    Streeter J (1988) Inhibition of legume nodule formation and N2 fixation by nitrate. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Science 7: 1-23
    Teillet A, Garcia J, de Billy F, Gherardi N I, Huguet T, Barker D G, de Carvalho-Niebel F. Journet E-P (2008) api, a novel Medicago truncatula symbiotic mutant impaired in nodule primordium invasion. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 21: 535-546
    Tsay Y-F, Chiu C-C, Tsai C-B, Ho C-H, Hsu P-K (2007) Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters. FEBS Letters 581 2290-2300
    Tsay Y-F, Schroeder J I, Feldmann K A, Crawford N M (1993) The herbicide sensitivity gene CHL1 of Arabidopsis encodes a nitrate-inducible nitrate transporter. Cell 72: 705-713
    Udvardi M K, Day D A (1997) Metabolite transport across symbiotic membranes of legume nodules. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 493-523
    Veereshlingam H, Haynes J G, Sherrier D J, Penmetsa R V, Cook D R, Dickstein R (2004) nip, a symbiotic Medicago truncatula mutant that forms root nodules with aberrant infection threads and plant defense-like response. Plant Physiol. 136: 3692-3702
    Walch-Liu P, Forde B G (2008) Nitrate signalling mediated by the NRT1.1 nitrate transporter antagonises L-glutamate-induced changes in root architecture. Plant Journal doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03443.x
    Walch-Liu P, Liu L-H, Remans T, Tester M, Forde B G (2006) Evidence that L-glutamate can act as an exogenous signal to modulate root growth and branching in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 47: 1045-1057
    Wang R, Xing X, Wang Y, Tran A, Crawford N M (2009) A genetic screen for nitrate regulatory mutants captures the nitrate transporter gene NRT1.1. Plant Physiology 151: 472-478
    Wang Y-Y, Tsay Y-F (2011) Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT1.9 is important in phloem nitrate transport. Plant Cell 23: 1945-1957
    Waterworth W M, Bray C M (2006) Enigma variations for peptides and their transporters in higher plants. Annals of Botany 98: 1-8
    White J, Prell J, James E K, Poole P (2007) Nutrient sharing between symbionts. Plant Physiology 144: 604-614
    Wilkinson J Q, Crawford N M (1991) Identification of the Arabidopsis CHL3 gene as the nitrate reductase structural gene NIA2. Plant Cell 3: 461-471
    Xu G, Fan X, Miller A J (2012) Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annual Review Plant Biology 63: 5.1-5.30
    Yamashita T, Shimada S, Guo W, Sato K, Kohmura E, Hayakawa T, Takagi T, Tohyama M (1997) Cloning and functional expression of a brain peptide/histidine transporter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 10205-10211
    Yendrek C R, Lee Y-C, Morris V, Liang Y, Pislariu C I, Burkart G, Meckfessel M H, Salehin M, Kessler H, Wessler H, Lloyd M, Lutton H, Teillet A, Sherrier D J, Journet E-P, Harris J M, Dickstein R (2010) A putative transporter is essential for integrating nutrient and hormone signaling with lateral root growth and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. The Plant Journal 62: 100-112
    Yokoyama T, Kodama N, Aoshima H, Izu H. Matsushita K, Yamada M (2001) Cloning of a cDNA for a constitutive NRT1 transporter from soybean and comparison of gene expression of soybean NRT1 transporters. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1518: 79-86
    Young N D, Debelle F, Oldroyd G E D, Geurts R, Cannon S B, Udvardi M K, Benedito V A, Mayer K F X, Gouzy J, Schoof H, Van de Peer Y, Proost S, Cook D R, Meyers B C, Spannagl M, Cheung F, De Mita S, Krishnakumar V, Gundlach H, Zhou S, Mudge J, Bharti A K, Murray J D, Naoumkina M A, Rosen B, et al. (2011) The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 480: 520-524
    Zhang H, Jennings A J, Forde B G (2000) Regulation of Arabidopsis root development by nitrate availability. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 51-59
    Zhao X, Huang J, Yu H, Wang L, Xie W (2010) Genomic survey, characterization and expression profile analysis of the peptide transporter family in rice (Oryza saliva L.). BMC Plant Biology 10 92
    Zhou J-J, Theodoulou F L, Muldini I, Ingemarssoni B, Miller A J (1998) Cloning and functional characterization of a Brassica napus transporter that is able to transport nitrate and histidine. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 12017-12023
    Zifarelli G, Pusch M (2010) CLC transport proteins in plants. FEBS Letters 584: 2122-2127

## Claims

1. A transgenic plant, or parts thereof, with increased biomass compared to a non-transformed plant of the same variety, or parts thereof wherein substantially all cells of the plant have been transformed with a construct comprising a heterologous, constitutive promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:8.

2. A seed of the transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 1, wherein the seed comprises the construct.

3. The transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 1, wherein the transgenic plant is a transformed Arabidopsis thaliana and wherein the parts comprise the construct.

4. A seed of the transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 3, wherein the seed comprises the construct.

5. The transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 1, wherein the transgenic plant is a transformed Medicago truncatula and wherein the parts comprise the construct.

6. A seed of the transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 5, wherein the seed comprises the construct.

7. The transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 1, wherein the transgenic plant is a transformed tobacco plant and wherein the parts comprise the construct.

8. A seed of the transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 7, wherein the seed or parts comprise the construct.

9. A method of producing a transgenic plant, said method comprising: transforming substantially all cells in a plant with a construct comprising a heterologous, constitutive promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:8.

10. The transgenic plant produced by the method of claim 9.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the plant is Arabidopsis thaliana.

12. A progeny of the transgenic plant produced by the method of claim 9, wherein the progeny comprises the construct.

13. The method of claim 9, wherein the plant is M. truncatula.

14. The method of claim 9, wherein the plant is a tobacco plant.

15. A method for generating transgenic seeds for plants having an increased biomass, comprising the step of:
(a) multiplying plant cells that contain at least one genetic transformation event of interest and which are capable of regeneration; wherein the genetic transformation event comprises a promoter nucleotide sequence that is capable of initiating transcription in a constitutive manner of an operably linked heterologous nucleic acid sequence comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a protein having a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 into said plant cells;
(b) selecting the plant cells that comprise at least one genetic transformation event of interest;
(c) regenerating a whole transgenic plant, or parts thereof, termed primary transformants, or T0 plants, from said plant cells;
(d) pollinating said primary transformants with non-transgenic pollen;
(e) harvesting the seeds obtained, termed T1, which have integrated at least one transgene of interest;
(f) sowing said transgenic T1 seeds and pollinating the plants which result therefrom, either by self-pollination or by free pollination; and
(g) harvesting the T2 seeds.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the plant cells are Arabidopsis thaliana plant cells, Medicago truncatula plant cells or tobacco plant cells.

17. An isolated transformation vector construct having a heterologous, constitutive promoter region operably linked to an expression region having at least 95% homology with SeqID No.: 23, SeqID No.: 24, or SeqID No.: 25.

18. A transgenic plant, or parts thereof, comprising a construct comprising a heterologous, constitutive promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a protein comprising SEQ ID NO:2 or SEQ ID NO:8, wherein the parts comprise the construct.

19. The transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 18, wherein the plant cells are Arabidopsis thaliana plant cells or a M. truncatula plant cells.

20. The transgenic plant, or parts thereof, of claim 18, wherein the plant cells are tobacco plant cells.

21. A seed of the transgenic plant of claim 18, wherein the seed comprises the construct.