alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy T. Yates, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ TIMOTHY T. YATES
Timothy T. Yates
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 5, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### §2985c–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–568, §14(k), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2438

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §745, formerly §744(b), as added Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2322; renumbered §745 and amended Pub. L. 94–341, §2(b)(15), (17)(C), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 806, set forth provisions relating to report by Director on availability and effectiveness of Federal agency programs.
#### Berdie Garfinkel, Respondent, v. Otto Garfinkel, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for leave to discontinue his appeal granted. The appeal is discontinued, without costs, and without prejudice to respondent’s pending motion at Special Term for a counsel fee. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### H. E. Munson, appellant, v. Dee Minor, appellee.

Action of forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for defendant. *623Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby county; the Hon. William B. Wright, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 10, 1922.

Vause & Kiger, for appellant; Whitaker, Ward & Pugh, of counsel. A. L. Yantis, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus HERALDEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50197.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2007.

Filed March 21, 2007.

*644Stephen M. Miller, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James Fife, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

1. Heraldez’s alienage was not re-litigated in the proceedings below; rather, evidence of Heraldez’s ongoing dispute with the Department of Homeland Security established Heraldez’s motive to willfully misrepresent his name to border authorities and to explain the circumstances of the offense conduct. *See Santamaria v. Horsley,*133 F.3d 1242, 1247 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc), *amended,*138 F.3d 1280 (9th Cir.1998) (Kozinski, J., concurring).

2. A rational trier of fact could have found Heraldez’s misrepresentation of his name at the border material beyond a reasonable doubt. *United States v. Mayberry,*913 F.2d 719, 723 (9th Cir. 1990); *United States v. Facchini,*874 F.2d 638, 643-44 (9th Cir.1989) (en banc).

3. The government’s presentation of evidence that Heraldez gave a false birth date, as well as a false name, did not amount to a constructive amendment or a fatal variance. *United States v. Von Stoll,*726 F.2d 584 (9th Cir.1984).

4. The district court’s finding that Heraldez was attempting to facilitate his entry into the United States in violation of his prior removal order by giving a false name to border authorities was not clearly erroneous. Therefore, the district court did not err in imposing a four-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(8)(C) (2005). Moreover, the district court’s factual finding at sentencing did not violate the principles of collateral estoppel. *See United States v. Watts,*
      *645519 U.S. 148, 157, 117 S.Ct. 633, 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997) (per curiam).

5. The court did not err in limiting Heraldez’s allocution once he started to discuss matters immaterial to mitigation. *United States v. Mack,*200 F.3d 653, 657-58 (9th Cir.2000); *United States v. Kellogg,*955 F.2d 1244, 1250 (9th Cir.1992).

6. The district court’s limited discussion of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors did not amount to plain error. *United States v. Knows His Gun,*438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.2006), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 2913, 165 L.Ed.2d 931 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Amsterdam and Batavia Handelsvereeniging, Respondent, v. Joseph R. Marquette, Jr., Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the revised findings and recommendations

of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2746

___________

James Allen Long, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *

Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 1, 2008

 Filed: October 7, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Allen Long appeals the district court’s1

 judgment dismissing his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on two

issues: (1) whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the way that

the trial court handled the State’s challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79
-2-

(1986), and (2) whether counsel on direct appeal was ineffective for failing to argue

that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object.

Following our careful review of the record, the briefs, and the applicable law,

we conclude the district court properly denied Long’s petition, for the reasons cited

in the magistrate judge’s thorough report, adopted by the district court. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Long’s pro se motion is denied.

______________________________
# Amtsblatt L 16I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0642 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | L 016I |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Rechtsvorschriften | 62. Jahrgang18. Januar 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0642

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

L 016I

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Rechtsvorschriften

62. Jahrgang18. Januar 2019

---

| Inhalt | | Berichtigungen | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/73 der Kommission vom 17. Januar 2019 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls und zur endgültigen Vereinnahmung des vorläufigen Zolls auf die Einfuhren von Elektrofahrrädern mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China ( ABl. L 16 vom 18.1.2019 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Berichtigungen

Seite

*

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/73 der Kommission vom 17. Januar 2019 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls und zur endgültigen Vereinnahmung des vorläufigen Zolls auf die Einfuhren von Elektrofahrrädern mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China ( ABl. L 16 vom 18.1.2019 )

( ABl. L 16 vom 18.1.2019 )

1

| DE | Bei Rechtsakten, deren Titel in magerer Schrift gedruckt sind, handelt es sich um Rechtsakte der laufenden Verwaltung im Bereich der Agrarpolitik, die normalerweise nur eine begrenzte Geltungsdauer haben.
  Rechtsakte, deren Titel in fetter Schrift gedruckt sind und denen ein Sternchen vorangestellt ist, sind sonstige Rechtsakte. |
| --- | --- |

DE

Bei Rechtsakten, deren Titel in magerer Schrift gedruckt sind, handelt es sich um Rechtsakte der laufenden Verwaltung im Bereich der Agrarpolitik, die normalerweise nur eine begrenzte Geltungsdauer haben.

Rechtsakte, deren Titel in fetter Schrift gedruckt sind und denen ein Sternchen vorangestellt ist, sind sonstige Rechtsakte.

---

Berichtigungen

| 18.1.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | LI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

LI 16/1

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2019/73 der Kommission vom 17. Januar 2019 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls und zur endgültigen Vereinnahmung des vorläufigen Zolls auf die Einfuhren von Elektrofahrrädern mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 16 vom 18. Januar 2019
  )

Auf Seite 135, in Artikel 4:

Vor dem Satz:

„Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat.“,

muss der folgende Satz eingefügt werden:

„Diese Verordnung tritt am Tag nach ihrer Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union in Kraft.“

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1038

FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GORDON ROBERT HANDLER, Group Manager, Internal

Revenue Service; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Region Four;

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ALBERT D. ADAMS, JR., Disclosure Officer, Internal Revenue Service; MARC ARONIN, Revenue

Officer, Internal Revenue Service; PHIL BRAND,

District Director; RICHARD L. CHAUNCEY, Revenue Agent,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.

(CA-98-901-Y, CA-98-1722-Y)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Thomas Sheehan,

Melissa Anemojanis Holton, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his actions filed pursuant to the Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 1996 & Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allnutt v. Handler, Nos. CA-98-901-Y; CA-98-1722-Y

(D. Md. May 24, 2000 and Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the meeting of 
the President's Cancer Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended, because the premature disclosure of information and the 
discussions would likely to significantly frustrate implementation of 
recommendations.

    Name of Committee: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: January 24-25, 2005.
    Open: January 24, 2005, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Translating Research to Reduce Burden of Cancer.
    Place: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, 
New York, NY 10021.
    Closed: January 25, 2005, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: The Panel will supplement its public hearings with 
discussion of prepublication manuscripts on Translating Research 
into Clinical Practice. These manuscripts have been provided by 
their authors with the understanding that the Panel will not break 
prepublication embargo conditions.
    Place: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, 
New York, NY 10021.
    Contact Person: Maureen O. Wilson, PhD, Executive Secretary, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center 
Drive, Building 31, Room 3A18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-1148.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the comments to the Contact Person listed on 
this notice. The comments should include the name, address, 
telephone number and, when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/pcp.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posed when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; Cancer Centers 
Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27407 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[115th Congress Public Law 396]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5296]]

Public Law 115-396
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 
                          2018 -  [S. 3628]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: National Flood 
Insurance Program Extension Act. 42 USC 4001 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Extension Act''.
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``December 7, 2018'' 
and inserting ``May 31, 2019''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking ``December 
7, 2018'' and inserting ``May 31, 2019''.
    (c) <<NOTE: 42 USC 4016 note.>>  Retroactive Effective Date.--If 
this Act is enacted after December 7, 2018, the amendments made by 
subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect as if enacted on December 7, 
2018.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3628:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Nov. 29, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 31, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.40

[CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND ARE DENOTED BY A TRIPLE ASTERISK
(***). THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE
COMMISSION.]

                                 HELLOSOFT, INC.
                               SERVICES AGREEMENT
                                  Amendment 3.0

         This Amendment ("Amendment") to the HelloSoft Services Agreement dated
March 31st, 2004 ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of November 3, 2005
(the "Amended Effective Date") between HelloSoft, Inc. ("HelloSoft"), a Delaware
corporation, having a principal place of business at 2099 Gateway Place, Suite
200, San Jose, California 95110, and Rim Semiconductor ("Rim"), a California
corporation, having its place of business at 305 NE 102nd Ave, Suite 105,
Portland, OR 97220.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed to add to the
Agreement, Exhibit B found in this Amendment.

HELLOSOFT, INC.                           RIM SEMICONDUCTOR

By:        Krishna Yarlagadda             By:        Brad Ketch

Signature:  /s/ Krishna Yarlagadda        Signature: /s/  Brad Ketch
           ------------------------                -----------------------------
Title:     CEO                            Title:     CEO/President
Address:   2099 Gateway Place #200        Address:   305 NE 102nd Ave, Suite 105
Address:   San Jose, CA 95110.            Address:   Portland, OR  97220



<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT B
                                    SERVICES

1.       Project Description.
         ***

2.       Compensation

         Rim will pay Hellosoft the following NRE fees (in cash) upon signing
         this Amendment: $60,000



-------
*** Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
̄

012

Miles

This product was produced from geospatial information prepared by

the USDA Forest Service. Source map scales vary and accuracy of

this product has not been assessed. Using GIS product for purposes

other than those for which they were created my yield inaccurate or

misleading results.

Disclaimer

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004

Land Site Type

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between Lakes The SOUTH

Legend

Site Type

Xeric

Dry

Dry-Mesic

Mesic

Alluvial

Other Features

Major Rivers and Lakes

Road Level

1

2

3

4

5
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Draftenvironmental assessment: MCAS Miramar vernal pool mitigation area planning.
 
Part1 |Part2 | Part3
 
SuDoc Number:D 214.2:M 67/DRAFT
Item Number:0383 (online)
System Number:000946900
September 9, 2019
03/02/2017 14:55 8472947498 FAA GLRC 

In the matter of: 

RYAN CORNWALL 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF BEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0017 

Case No. 2013-CE-09-0058 

DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVE 

PAGE 02/03 

Due to the retirement of Attorney Mark Camacho, the Federal Aviation Administration, by 

counsel, hereby fiies a Designation of Representative and states that the Representative in this 

matter is now Attorney Kate Barber whose address is as follows: 

Kate Barber 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division 

Midwest Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 E. Devon Ave. 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

847-294-7862; Fax: 847-294-8293 

Respectfully submitted, 

Naomi Tsuda 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 

K 

~(~ te Barber 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Midwest Team 

2300 East Devon A vc. 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Email: kate.barber@faa.gov 

Telephone: (847) 294-7313 (main) 

(84 7) 294-7862 (direct) 

(847) 294-7498 (fax) 

Dated: March 2, 2017 
03/02/2017 14:55 8472947498 FAA GLRC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

l hereby certify that on this date, I have sent by U.S. Certified Mail- return receipt 

requested, a copy of the foregoing Designation of Representative to: 

Ryan Cornwall 

6025 Birdcage St. 

No. 88 

Citrus Heights, CA 95610 

PAGE 03/03 

I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent by U.S. Certified Mail - return receipt 

requested and via Fax, the original and one copy of the foregoing docum.ent to: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent by U.S. Certified Mail - retum receipt 

requested and via Fax, the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Judge Douglas M. Rawland 

U.S, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S, Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Date: 
03/02/2017 14:55 8472947498 

To: 

Company: 

Fax: 

From: 

RE: 

FAA GLRC 

/ 

PAGE 01/03 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Regional Counsel's OfficeAGL-7 

2300 EastDevon Avehue 

. Des Plaines, IIDnois 60018 

T 847-294- 7?JI !J 

F 847-2947498 

Facsimile
§ 1508.120 May we grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) The ADF President may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the ADF President grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
( b ) An exception granted by one agency for an excluded person does not extend to the covered transactions of another agency.
#### § 210.3A-01 [Reserved]
#### § 270.30d-1 Filing of copies of reports to shareholders.

A registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), that is required to file annual and quarterly reports pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) shall satisfy its requirement to file such reports by the filing, in accordance with the rules and procedures specified therefor, of reports on Form N-CSR (§§ 249.331 and 274.128 of this chapter). A registered unit investment trust or a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 that is required to file annual and quarterly reports pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall satisfy its requirement to file such reports by the filing, in accordance with the rules and procedures specified therefor, of reports on Form N-CEN (§§ 249.330 and 274.101 of this chapter).

[69 FR 11264, Mar. 9, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 82021, Nov. 18, 2016]