alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75360-75361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27478]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/79-0456]


HorizonVentures Fund II, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P., 4 Main 
Street, Suite 50, Los Altos, CA 94022, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security 
financing to Venturi Wireless, Inc. The financing is contemplated for 
operating expenses and for general corporate purposes.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the

[[Page 75361]]

Regulations because Horizon Ventures Fund I, L.P. and Horizon Ventures 
Advisors Fund I, L.P., both Associates of Horizon Ventures Fund II, 
L.P., own more than ten percent of Venturi Wireless, Inc.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

Jaime Guzman-Fournier,
 Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 04-27478 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MICHAEL S. GILLILAND

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
Michael S. Gilliland, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|/s/MICHAEL S. GILLILANDMichael S. Gilliland
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2006 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### §286d. National Information Center

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Library an entity to be known as the National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (in this section referred to as the "Center").

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of the Center is the collection, storage, analysis, retrieval, and dissemination of information on health services research, clinical practice guidelines, and on health care technology, including the assessment of such technology. Such purpose includes developing and maintaining data bases and developing and implementing methods of carrying out such purpose.

#### (c) Electronic, convenient format; criteria for inclusion

The Director of the Center shall ensure that information under subsection (b) concerning clinical practice guidelines is collected and maintained electronically and in a convenient format. Such Director shall develop and publish criteria for the inclusion of practice guidelines and technology assessments in the information center database.

#### (d) Coordination with Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

The Secretary, acting through the Center, shall coordinate the activities carried out under this section through the Center with related activities of the Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §478A, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title XIV, §1421, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 171; amended Pub. L. 106–129, §2(b)(2), Dec. 6, 1999, 113 Stat. 1670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–129 substituted "Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality" for "Administrator for Health Care Policy and Research".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction

Pub. L. 103–43, §1422(b), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 172, provided that: "The amendments made by section 3 of Public Law 102–410 (106 Stat. 2094) [amending section 299a–1 of this title], by section 1421 of this Act [enacting this section], and by subsection (a) of this section [amending section 299a–1 of this title] may not be construed as terminating the information center on health care technologies and health care technology assessment established under section 904 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 299a–2], as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of Public Law 102–410 [Oct. 13, 1992]. Such center shall be considered to be the center established in section 478A of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 286d], as added by section 1421 of this Act, and shall be subject to the provisions of such section 478A."
# Delegation of Certain Reporting Authority

# Memorandum for the Chairman of the Federal Labor Relations Authority

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the member who has been designated by the President as Chairman the functions conferred upon the President by 5 U.S.C. 7104(e) to provide the specified report to the Congress. 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

[FR Doc. 04-27466

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### § 1508.605 How does suspension differ from debarment?

Suspension differs from debarment in that—

| A suspending official . . . | A debarring official . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Imposes suspension as a temporary status of ineligibility for procurement and nonprocurement transactions, pending completion of an investigation or legal proceedings | Imposes debarment for a specified period as a final determination that a person is not presently responsible. |
| (b) Must— (1) Have *adequate evidence* that there may be a cause for debarment of a person; and (2) Conclude that *immediate action* is necessary to protect the Federal interest | Must conclude, based on a *preponderance of the evidence,* that the person has engaged in conduct that warrants debarment. |
| (c) Usually imposes the suspension *first,* and then promptly notifies the suspended person, giving the person an opportunity to contest the suspension and have it lifted | Imposes debarment *after* giving the respondent notice of the action and an opportunity to contest the proposed debarment. |
#### § 1506.32 If I am jointly and severally liable on a claim, will USADF delay collection action against me until the other debtors pay their proportional share?

When two or more debtors are jointly and severally liable, collection action will not be withheld against one debtor until the other or others pay their proportionate share. The amount of a compromise with one debtor is not precedent in determining compromises from other debtors who have been determined to be jointly and severally liable on the claim.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER ON M OTION TO R ECUSE

Appellate case name: Dov K. A v ni a/k/a Dov A v n i Kaminetzky v. David A. Newman

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 008 63

- C V

Trial court case number: 2010

- 22875

Trial court: 33 3 rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 6, 2014

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion to recuse is denied.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Terry J e nnings

Acting for the Court

The Court consists of: Justices Jennings, Keyes, Sharp, Massengale, Brown , and Huddle

.

Date: March 4 , 2014
# National HIV Surveillance System (NHSS)

## At a glance

The National HIV Surveillance System (NHSS) is the primary source of HIV data for monitoring cases of HIV infection in the United States and 6 U.S. territories and freely associated states (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, Republic of Palau, U.S. Virgin Islands). The data are reported by laboratory and health care providers to state or local surveillance programs, who in turn report the data to CDC. 

## How NHSS data are collected

Surveillance programs of local, territorial, and state health departments gather information on demographic characteristics (sex assigned at birth, gender, race/ethnicity, age, and place of diagnosis), transmission category (mode of exposure), and all test results indicative of HIV infection and for monitoring stage of disease (viral load and CD4 count and percent). 

Information collected includes routine reporting of laboratory tests for HIV to the health department using a standard confidential case report form or via direct reporting from the laboratory. This information is then transmitted electronically, without personal identifiers, to CDC as part of the NHSS.

## How NHSS data are used

Data are used to
          - monitor the distribution and transmission of HIV,  
          - plan and evaluate prevention and care programs,  
          - allocate resources,  
          - inform policy development, and  
          - identify and respond to rapid transmission of HIV.  

## Current data releases

          - HIV Diagnoses, Deaths, and Prevalence  
          - Estimated HIV Incidence and Prevalence  
          - National HIV Prevention and Care Outcomes  
          - Social Determinants of Health  
          - HIV and Stage 3 (AIDS) Data for the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program   

### Technical notes‎

Technical Notes in the NCHHSTP Atlas Plus.

## Previous data releases

          - Previous data releases on CDC Stacks  
          - NCHHSTP Atlas Plus  

## Resources

View More

## 		On This Page	

              - How NHSS data are collected
              - How NHSS data are used
              - Current data releases
              - Previous data releases
              - Resources

SourcesPrintShare

FacebookLinkedInTwitterSyndicate

National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis PreventionDivision of HIV Prevention
Gisele Holloway ! 295 Autumn Wood Lane, GA 30075 ! Phone: 404.368.5677 E

- Mail: contact@aerialavenue.com ! Web: www.aerialavenue.com

Date: 01/11/2016

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
,

As I am a photographer or several years now, I have decided to expand and create anot her business utilizing unmanned
aerial vehicles to serve the need s in the market here in Georgia from companies that have been looking f or aerial services utilizing UAS ’ s. I would li k e to request FAA authorizations under the Exemption 333 to conduct Aerial photography, videography, inspection for Real Estate, architecture, land surveying, engineering, television, public events, cinematography, newsgathering, utility infrastructure, and search and rescue.

The proposed operations will be conducted utilizing with a DJI Phantom 3 Pro, when weighting less than 55 pounds including payload. All o perations mu st utilize a visual observer, also operated within the visual line of sight. And in accordance with the FAA guidelines for U AV’s and it’s operations rules, such as operational speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour), which will be monitor ed and in compliance with the 87 knots speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds grater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the aircraft manufacturer. The UA will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400ft a bove the ground level.

I will be responsible for maintaining and inspection the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation. Following

pre
- flight inspections, and making sure UAV is safe to fly.

Under this grant of exemption, The pilot in co mmand will have a Private or sport license, also a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid US driver’s license issues by the estate. Meeting all the flight requirements specified. Only permitting the PIC after demonstrate the ability to safely op erate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this grant.

Again, I am aware of all the rules, as I have been doing training and research on the industry for almost a year. A nd I will safely follow all the guidelines currently presented by the FAA and keep them update as new update rules appears.

Sincerely,

Gisele Holloway
Owner at Aerial Avenue
#### White Bay Enterprises, Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Newsday, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

[715 NYS2d 865]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin the defendant from terminating a contract designating the plaintiff as one of its newspaper delivery agents, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated November 15, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint vand, in effect, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and the plaintiff White Bay Enterprises, Ltd., cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly found that neither party demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment *(see, Phillips v Kantor & Co.,*31 NY2d 307; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). In addition, the Supreme Court properly found that the plaintiff stated a cause of action for tortious interference with contractual relationships *(see, Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, Inc.,*88 NY2d 413).

The parties’ remaining claims are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Seth Penn Leet, Commissioner, Respondent, for the Issuance of Subpœnas to Abraham H. Barashick and Others. David Perlo, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
STORING POOL CHEMICALS SAFELY

For more information about the safe storage of pool chemicals, check your pool safety plan or visit 

www.cdc.gov/healthyswimming

Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CS232164-A

 Get trained in pool chemical safety (for example, during operator training course)

 Ask for help if you are NOT trained for specific tasks

 Read entire product label or Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) before storing

 Learn your pool’s Emergency Chemical Spill Response Plan and practice steps 

(for example, evacuation)

 Follow product label directions for chemical storage:

 Dress for safety by wearing appropriate safety equipment (for example, safety 

goggles, gloves, and mask)

 Separate incompatible chemicals (for example, acid and chlorine) 

 Lock chemicals up to protect people and animals

 Keep chemicals dry and do not mix different chemicals (for example, different types of 

chlorine products)

 Keep chemicals cool in a well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight

 Keep chemicals closed in original, labeled container

 Store liquid chemicals low to prevent accidental contact (for example, by leaking) with 

chemicals or substances stored below them

 Follow product label directions for safe disposal; never reuse containers

 Contact local or state hazardous materials agency for proper disposal procedures for pool 

chemicals in unlabeled containers

Always respond to pool chemical spills immediately. Follow your pool’s Emergency Chemical 

Spill Response Plan, and be sure to contact the proper authorities and management.

BEFORE YOU STORE POOL CHEMICALS 

Pool Address and Phone Number:

Emergency Response Phone Number: 

Local Health Department Phone Number:

DISPOSAL OF POOL CHEMICAL CONTAINERS

POOL CHEMICAL SAFETY: STORAGE

PROTECT YOURSELF AND SWIMMERS FROM THE THOUSANDS OF PREVENTABLE INJURIES THAT OCCUR EACH YEAR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          40,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,457)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,372
<PP&E>                                          32,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,118
<SALES>                                        111,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,816
<CGS>                                           75,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-56,769-03

EX PARTE JAMES EDWARD GIBSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2012CR7134-W2 IN THE 186TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to unlawful

possession of a firearm by a felon, and was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. 

In the instant application, Applicant contends in his first ground for review that the

trial court abused its discretion by ordering this sentence to run concurrently with a prior

sentence. In his second ground for review, Applicant contends that the Board of Pardons and

Parolesisretroactively applying Section 508.149 of the Texas Government Code to deny him
2

eligibility for mandatory supervision, in violation of the prohibition on ex post

facto application of the law. Lastly, Applicant alleges that his plea agreement in this case has

been violated, rendering the plea involuntary because he believed at the time of the plea that

his previous sentence would be the controlling sentence for purposes of mandatory

supervision eligibility and release.

This Court has reviewed Applicant's first ground for relief and has determined that it

is barred from review under Article 11.07, Section 4 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. Therefore, that ground is dismissed. Applicant's remaining claim concerning the

ex post facto application of the law and breach of the plea agreement are denied.

Filed: October 24, 2018

Do not publish
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathan Lemler, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant (by permission) from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, entered September 10, 1976, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, rendered April 17, 1974. Order affirmed on the opinion of Judge Morrison of the County Court. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                |   |                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| By: /s/                Edward C. Gaiennie                                                                                      |   |  October                24, 2006 |
| Edward                    C. GaiennieChief                    Financial Officer and Principal Accounting                    Officer |   |                                  |

----