alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-0968

LT Case No. 2020-CF-6399

_____________________________

NICHOLAS ANTHONY 

FAIRCLOUGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

London M. Kite, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, HARRIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
§ 224.41 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the A.I.D. Administrator.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the A.I.D. Administrator.
### §1382k. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–123, §2(h), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1661

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVI, §1622, as added Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXII, §2201(g), 95 Stat. 833, related to benefits for individuals formerly receiving minimum benefits.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to benefits for months after December 1981, see section 2(j)(2) of Pub. L. 97–123, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 415 of this title.

Pub. L. 97–35, title XXII, §2201(h), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 834, which provided for the effective date of this section and the other enactments and amendments made by section 2201 of Pub. L. 97–35, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–123, §2(j)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1661.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 25, 2015

NO. 03-13-00196-CV

Michelle Bubnis, Appellant

v.

Leander Independent School District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTON, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on December 21, 2012. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates: 1940: population: families: size of family and age of head: regions andcities of 1,000,000 or more**
 
Parts: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/25
Item Number:0213 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104666
 
August 21, 2019
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE

RE VOLUMINOUS MOTIONS

Both sides filed many summary judgment motions. The Court has been patiently working

its way through them and has now issued four separate orders on them. By 9:00 A.M. FRIDAY,

APRIL 9, please advise the Court which, if any, remaining motions counsel truly needs an order

on, even if abbreviated, with one sentence each explaining why it cannot wait until the charging

conference or at least until the final pretrial conference. Do not use this as an opportunity to

submit more argument or authorities or evidence. One page will do. 

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02058-WHA Document 60 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
Map 3-8

Vegetation Types and Ecoregions on Public Lands in Alaska

Source: USDI BLM 2002b; U.S. Geological Survey 2002d

Tundra

Subarctic

Marine

0 100 200 300 400

Miles

Evergreen Woodland

Mixed Evergreen - Deciduous Woodland

Deciduous Forest

Mixed Evergreen - Deciduous Forest

Deciduous Woodland

Evergreen Forest

Perennial Graminoid

Riparian / Wetland

Deciduous Shrubland

Deciduous Dwarf-Shrubland

Other

3-87
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“Act”), ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C78” Committee”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C78”, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of C78 Committee's standards development activities are: to develop and maintain American National Standards related to electric lamps. Currently, C78 Committee maintains standards relating to different types of electric lamps including fluorescent, metal halide, sodium, mercury, and incandescent lamps. The standards developed by C78 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27061  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Ellis H. Colvin, Appellant, v. Town of Brant, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **341**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KEITH BILLINGSLEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:03

- cr - 00395

- JCC

- 3; 1:07

- cv - 00185

- JCC )

Submitted : December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Keith Billingsley , Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Lawrence Joseph Leiser , Assistant United States Attorneys, Mark Alex Grider, Tino Martin Lisella, Luis Morales , Melissa Siskind, OFFICE OF T HE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria , Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Billingsley seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion as successive and time

- barred . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dis positive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Billingsley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisio nal
process. DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"),  I,  George  Morris,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                     /s/  George  Morris
Dated:  August  14,  2003            -------------------------------------------
                                     George  Morris
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.









                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEN LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

v

THE CCPOA BENEFIT TRUST FUND et

al,

Defendants.

 /

No C 08-3228 VRW

ORDER

Plaintiff Ken Lewis seeks leave to file motions to strike

deposition testimony of Michael Smalley and to compel the

production of certain board meeting minutes and agendas. Doc #114. 

Defendants have filed a letter in response. Doc #115.

Having considered the parties’ submissions, the court

GRANTS plaintiff’s request for leave. Plaintiff may serve and file

Case 3:08-cv-03228-VRW Document 116 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a motion to strike and a motion to compel per his May 18, 2010

letter to the court on or before June 18, 2010. Defendants’

opposition shall be filed on or before July 2, 2010. Plaintiff may

file his reply on or before July 11, 2010, at which time the matter

is referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James or her

designee for disposition not later than September 3, 2010. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03228-VRW Document 116 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2
(April 10, 1978)

#### In the Matter of John Walter Hutton, an Attorney.

John Walter Hutton, an attorney who was admitted to the Bar by this court on December 21, 1960, has submitted an affidavit dated March 16, 1978 in which he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor at law (see 22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Hutton acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District and that the following charges are pending against him: (1) Commingling and converting $225,000, which amount was to be held by him in escrow; (2) Issuing checks which were dishonored because of insufficient funds; (3) Failing to comply with an escrow agreement by prematurely releasing $1,500, as a result of which a default judgment was taken against Mr. Hutton for that amount and (4) Failing to keep accurate records and, in some cases, failing to keep any records of his financial transactions. In his affidavit, Mr. Hutton admits that if charges were predicated upon the misconduct alleged above in a disciplinary proceeding he could not successfully defend himself on the merits. Mr. Hutton states that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation. Under the circumstances herein, Mr. Hutton’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that his name be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective immediately. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.
§ 1508.435 What must I require of a primary tier participant? You as an agency official must require each participant in a primary tier covered transaction to— ( a ) Comply with subpart C of this part as a condition of participation in the transaction; and
( b ) Communicate the requirement to comply with Subpart C of this part to persons at the next lower tier with whom the primary tier participant enters into covered transactions.
### §284p. Activities of the National Institutes of Health with respect to research with implications for enhancing daily function for persons with paralysis

#### (a) In general

The Director, pursuant to the general authority of the Director, may make awards of grants to public or private entities to pay all or part of the costs of planning, establishing, improving, and providing basic operating support to multicenter networks of clinical sites that will collaborate to design clinical rehabilitation intervention protocols and measures of outcomes on one or more forms of paralysis that result from central nervous system trauma, disorders, or stroke, or any combination of such conditions.

#### (b) Research

A multicenter network of clinical sites funded through this section may—

(1) focus on areas of key scientific concern, including—

(A) improving functional mobility;

(B) promoting behavioral adaptation to functional losses, especially to prevent secondary complications;

(C) assessing the efficacy and outcomes of medical rehabilitation therapies and practices and assisting technologies;

(D) developing improved assistive technology to improve function and independence; and

(E) understanding whole body system responses to physical impairments, disabilities, and societal and functional limitations; and

(2) replicate the findings of network members or other researchers for scientific and translation purposes.

#### (c) Coordination of clinical trials networks; reports

The Director may, as appropriate, provide for the coordination of information among networks funded through this section and ensure regular communication among members of the networks, and may require the periodic preparation of reports on the activities of the networks and submission of reports to the Director.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XIV, §14201, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1453.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Christopher and Dana Reeve Paralysis Act, and also as part of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Director"

"Director" as meaning the Director of the National Institutes of Health, see section 284o(a) of this title.
##### **The Clorox Company**News Release

----

**CLOROX ANNOUNCES OFFERING OF$1.65 BILLION SENIOR NOTES**

OAKLAND, Calif.,November 29, 2004 – The Clorox Company (NYSE: CLX) (PCX: CLX)today announced that it intends to offer $1.65 billion aggregateprincipal amount of three-year floating-rate senior notes and five-and 10-year fixed rate senior notes in a private placementtransaction, subject to market and certain otherconditions.

 

Clorox stated that itintends to use the full amount of the net proceeds from theoffering to repay a portion of the amount outstanding underits commercial-paper program used to finance the cash contributionit made in connection with its previously announced share exchangewith Henkel KGaA.
 

The securities to beoffered will not be registered under the Securities Act orapplicable state securities laws or blue sky laws, and may not beoffered or sold in the United States absent registration under theSecurities Act and applicable state securities laws or availableexemptions from the registration requirements. This announcementshall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of anoffer to buy the notes.

**The statements inthis press release regarding the timing of the proposed privateplacement and its terms are forward-looking statements that involverisks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, marketconditions and the price and market for the securities to beoffered.**

**MediaRelations**

Kathryn Caulfield(510) 271-7209

Dan Staublin (510)271-1622

**InvestorRelations**

Steve Austenfeld (510)271-2270

Michael Iracondo (510)271-2156
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80
Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter

TS-EMLA50/60/70/80
Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Processing of Emulsifiers

TS-EMLA50/60/70/80
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates: 1940: population and housing: families: general characteristics;states, cities of 100,000 or more, and metropolitan districts of 200,000 ormore**
 
Table of Contents | Parts: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/23
Item Number:0198 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104634
 
August 21, 2019
#### Israel Berger and Tillie Berger, plaintiffs in error, v. Bessie Berger et al., defendants in error. Bessie Berger, defendant in error, v. Israel Berger et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 26,982.

Suit to restrain defendant from ousting complainants under a judgment for possession of certain property and for an accounting and reconveyance of certain real estate. Cross-bill for removal of a cloud on title. Decree for defendant on her cross-bill. Original bill dismissed. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 29, 1922.

Edward H. Morris and James B. Cashin, for plaintiffs in error. William Slack and Abram E. Adelman, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Rudolph Cadogan, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, rendered June 7, 1956, after a jury trial, convicting him of feloniously possessing a narcotic drug (Penal Law, § 1751), and sentencing him to serve a term of 9 to 10 years; and (2) from a judgment of said court rendered November 18, 1957, resentencing him to a term of 5 to 10 years. Judgment of June 7, 1956, modified on the law, by reducing the sentence to a term of 5 to 10 years. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The *648findings of i'act implicit in the jury’s verdict have been considered, and are affirmed. The original sentence imposed by the trial court exceeded the sentence prescribed by statute (Penal Law, § 2189). Judgment of November 18, 1957, resentencing defendant, affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.