alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES ANTHONY KRAH,

Plaintiff, 

 

v.

DEPUTY MATTHEW CROOK;

COUNTY OF SONOMA, 

Defendants. /

No. C 08-0038 WHA (PR) 

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL

AND SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff having been found in need of counsel to assist him in this matter, and counsel

willing to be appointed to represent plaintiff having been located, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Gilbert R. Serota (Bar No. 75305) and the law firm

of Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk and Rabkin, Three Embarcadero Center, Seventh

Floor, San Francisco, California, 94111-4024, are appointed as counsel for plaintiff pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and the court's Federal Pro Bono Project guidelines.

Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by counsel,

are hereby ordered to appear at a Case Management Conference before the undersigned on April

29, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 9, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California, for the purpose of setting trial and pretrial dates. No later than April 22,

2010, the parties shall file a joint case management statement pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. 

Any request to reschedule the date of the conference must be made in writing upon a

Case 3:08-cv-00038-WHA Document 34 Filed 03/26/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

showing of good cause, preferably by stipulation, and not later than April 19, 2010. 

The clerk shall add plaintiff’s appointed counsel to the docket, and serve a copy of this

order upon counsel for both parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25 , 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.08\KRAH0038.APT.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-00038-WHA Document 34 Filed 03/26/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 97 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 97 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 97 Filed 04/08/10 Page 3 of 3
§ 308.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Record* means any document, collection, or grouping of information about an individual maintained by the agency, including but not limited to information regarding education, financial transactions, medical history, criminal or employment history, or any other personal information which contains the name or personal identification number, symbol, photograph, or other identifying particular assigned to such individual, such as a finger or voiceprint.
( b ) *System of Records* means a group of any records under the control of the agency from which information is retrieved by use of the name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.
( c ) *Routine Use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected.
( d ) The term *agency* means the Peace Corps or any component thereof.
( e ) The term *individual* means any citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to permanent residence.
( f ) The term *maintain* includes the maintenance, collection, use or dissemination of any record.
( g ) The term *Act* means the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) as amended from time to time.
#### Edward Michael O’BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISA USA, INC.; Visa International, Inc.; Capital One Financial Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-56887.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 21, 2007.

Edward Michael O’Brien, Santa Barbara, CA, pro se.

*678Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Edward Michael O’Brien appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing for failure to prosecute his action against various financial institutions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan),*253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

O’Brien contends the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his action for failure to prosecute. This contention is unpersuasive because O’Brien did not establish that he served process on any defendant within 120 days of filing his complaint. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (providing a plaintiff with 120 days to serve process); *see also*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(h)(1) (describing the manner of effecting proper service upon a corporation).

O’Brien’s remaining contentions are also unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick T. Doyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/PATRICK T. DOYLEPatrick T. Doyle Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerMay 7, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Louis Nicoletti, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Charles Nicoletti, et al., Respondents, v. Alfred Palmer, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Norma Viggiano, et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 28, 1961, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, there is a fact issue for the jury as to plaintiffs’ contributory negligence *(Nelson*v. *Nygren,*259 N. Y. 71; cf. *Glendenning*v. *Feld,*285 App. Div. 604, affd. 309 N. Y. 867). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 92 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2
20

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 92 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2015

No. 04-15-00447-CR

Jeremiah HINDMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR11519

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 29, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th27 day of July, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
**
Exhibit 12.2 

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**

I, Nicolle Dorsey, certify the following: 

 

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of 4Front VenturesCorp. ******

 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.

The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 
 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 
 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and 

 
 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change on the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.

The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors: 

 
 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:**June******** 30, 2020**

 

/s/ Nicolle Dorsey

Nicolle Dorsey

Chief Financial Officer
**
### §291l. Conference of State agencies

Whenever in his opinion the purposes of this subchapter would be promoted by a conference, the Surgeon General may invite representatives of as many State agencies, designated in accordance with section 291d of this title, to confer as he deems necessary or proper. A conference of the representatives of all such State agencies shall be called annually by the Surgeon General. Upon the application of five or more of such State agencies, it shall be the duty of the Surgeon General to call a conference of representatives of all State agencies joining in the request.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §642, formerly §622, as added Pub. L. 88–443, §3(a), Aug. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 458, and renumbered §642, Pub. L. 91–296, title II, §201, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 344.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 291l, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §634, as added Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §2, 60 Stat. 1041, contained provisions similar to this section, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 88–443.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Surgeon General abolished by section 3 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, and functions thereof transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 1 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, set out as a note under section 202 of this title. Office of Surgeon General reestablished within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, see Notice of Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Mar. 30, 1987, 52 F.R. 11754.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 10, 2010

p0910 

# Order

September 10, 2010

140949

CASS KEEGO PROPERTIES LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140949 COA: 295076 Oakland CC: 2009-101952-NM ERIC R. BRYEN and STUART J. SNIDER, Defendants,

and

ARTHUR JAY WEIS S and ARTHUR JAY WEISS & ASSOCIATES, PC, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipul ation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 364]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5088]]

Public Law 115-364
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the sources of the 
   authority to issue regulations regarding certifications and other 
   criteria applicable to legislative branch employees under Wounded 
   Warriors Federal Leave Act. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 6160]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF SOURCES OF AUTHORITY TO ISSUE 
                              REGULATIONS REGARDING CERTIFICATIONS 
                              AND OTHER CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO 
                              LEGISLATIVE BRANCH EMPLOYEES UNDER 
                              WOUNDED WARRIORS FEDERAL LEAVE ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 6329(c) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``In order'' and inserting ``(1) In order''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

    ``(2) In the case of an employee of an office of the legislative 
branch, the certification described in paragraph (1) shall be 
prescribed--
            ``(A) in the case of an employee of the House of 
        Representatives, by the Committee on House Administration of the 
        House of Representatives;
            ``(B) in the case of an employee of the Senate, by the 
        Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate; or
            ``(C) in the case of an employee of any other office of the 
        legislative branch, by the head of the office.''.

    (b) <<NOTE: Deadline. 5 USC 6329 note.>>  Regulations.--Not later 
than 9 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Committee 
on House Administration of the House of Representatives, the Committee 
on Rules and Administration of the Senate, and the head of each other 
office of the legislative branch shall prescribe regulations governing 
the application of section 6329 of title 5, United States Code, 
including the certification requirement under subsection (c) of such 
section, to employees of the House of Representatives, employees of the 
Senate, and employees of such office, respectively.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6160:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            June 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Cashette Electric, Inc., Respondent, v Mt. Morris Central School District, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 141]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J), entered September 14, 2005. The order, among other things, denied in part defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\5634\Order re March 12 hearing.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIRTRANSPORTATION ANTITRUSTLITIGATION                                                                      /

This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS                                                                      /

No. C 07-05634 CRB

MDL 1913

ORDER

The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a

determination of the applicability of the Bankruptcy Court’s injunction to these proceedings. 

The merits of those motions will therefore not be the subject of the hearing scheduled for

March 12, 2010.  Instead, the parties should be prepared to discuss the merits of Defendants’

Motion To Stay Proceedings Upon Notice of Injunction in In Re: Japan Airlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01616-CRB   Document 12   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T16:50:58-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
February 23, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-03129-MMC Document 162 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board of Directors
 U.S. Bank National Association
 
 rustee, securities administration, registrar, paying agent and document custody services,
 
 Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by
        the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
        considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
        Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
        servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
        amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. Although the Company is responsible for assessing compliance with Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(v),
        and 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, there were no servicing activities performed by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019 that required these servicing criteria to be complied with. We believe that the evidence we obtained is
        sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.
 
 In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,
        for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.
 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 February 27, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4365 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 453
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4365

                          [Report No. 112-630]

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in 
   the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2012

   Ms. Buerkle (for herself and Mr. Ross of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

                             July 30, 2012

            Additional sponsor: Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia

                             July 30, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
                  [Insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in 
   the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 8437(e)(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in 
the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``659)'' and inserting ``659),''; and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the 
        following: ``, and shall be subject to a Federal tax levy under 
        section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.

SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS.

    Any potential revenue gain attributable to the enactment of this 
Act, as determined by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office--
            (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury 
        of the United States; and
            (2) shall be used solely for purposes of deficit reduction.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 453

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4365

                          [Report No. 112-630]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in 
   the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2012

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```