alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2277. Disclosure of Restricted Data

Whoever, being or having been an employee or member of the Commission, a member of the Armed Forces, an employee of any agency of the United States, or being or having been a contractor of the Commission or of an agency of the United States, or being or having been an employee of a contractor of the Commission or of an agency of the United States, or being or having been a licensee of the Commission, or being or having been an employee of a licensee of the Commission, knowingly communicates, or whoever conspires to communicate or to receive, any Restricted Data, knowing or having reason to believe that such data is Restricted Data, to any person not authorized to receive Restricted Data pursuant to the provisions of this chapter or under rule or regulation of the Commission issued pursuant thereto, knowing or having reason to believe such person is not so authorized to receive Restricted Data shall, upon conviction thereof, be punishable by a fine of not more than $12,500.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §227, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 959; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3148(c), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 938.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "$12,500" for "$2,500".
§ 240.5 Non-impairment of the Guarantee. After issuance of a Guarantee, that Guarantee will be an unconditional, full faith and credit obligation of the United States of America, and will not be affected or impaired by any subsequent condition or event. This non-impairment of the guarantee provision shall not, however, be operative with respect to any loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which the claiming Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became a Noteholder. Moreover, the Guarantee shall not be affected or impaired by: ( a ) Any defect in the authorization, execution, delivery or enforceability of any agreement or other document executed by a Noteholder, USAID, the Fiscal Agent or the Borrower in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Guarantee; or
( b ) The suspension or termination of the program pursuant to which USAID is authorized to guarantee the Eligible Notes.
### §290bb–25e. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §519E, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXI, §3104(c), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1173, related to prevention of methamphetamine and inhalant abuse and addiction.
#### § 237.01 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to prescribe the procedures and standard terms and conditions applicable to loan guarantees issued for the benefit of the Borrower, pursuant to Title III of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2015 (Div. J, Pub. L. 113-235) and the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113-95). The loan guarantees will be issued as provided herein pursuant to a Loan Guarantee Agreement to be signed in April 2015, between the United States of America and Ukraine (the “Loan Guarantee Agreement”). The loan guarantee will apply to sums borrowed during a period beginning on the date that the Loan Guarantee Agreement enters into force and ending thirty days after such date, not exceeding an aggregate total of one billion United States Dollars ($1,000,000,000) in principal amount. The loan guarantees shall ensure the Borrower's repayment of 100% of principal and interest due under such borrowings. The full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged for the full payment and performance of such guarantee obligations.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARIM ALLAN,

Plaintiff,

    v.

GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, etal.,

Defendants.                                                                           /

No. C 08-01534 MHP

JUDGMENT

(Fed, R, Civ. P. 54(b))

This action having come before this court, the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, United States

District Judge presiding, and the issues having been duly presented and an order having been duly

filed granting defendant GreenPoint Mortgage Funding’s motion for summary judgment,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety against

defendant GreenPoint Mortgage Funding.  This judgment is entered pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 54(b), there being no just reason for delay.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2010                                                               MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court JudgeNorthern District of California

Case 3:08-cv-01534-MHP   Document 98   Filed 07/27/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T16:45:35-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4149 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 

of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 

available resources under the supplemental security income program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2012 

Mr. SOUTHERLAND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

that the value of certain funeral and burial arrangements 

are not to be considered available resources under the 

supplemental security income program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNERAL AND BURIAL ARRANGE4 MENTS NOT CONSIDERED RESOURCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1613(e)(3) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382b(e)(3)) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(C) If— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4149 IH

1 ‘‘(i) an individual or the individual’s spouse en2 ters into an irrevocable contract with a provider of 

3 funeral goods and services for a funeral; 

4 ‘‘(ii) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

5 funds the contract by paying for the goods and serv6 ices; and 

7 ‘‘(iii)(I) the funeral provider subsequently 

8 places the funds in a trust or in escrow; or 

9 ‘‘(II) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

10 establishes an irrevocable trust, and the funeral pro11 vider is the named beneficiary of the trust, 

12 then the trust or escrow shall not be considered a resource 

13 available to the individual.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to payments for supplemental 

16 security income benefits under title XVI of the Social Se17 curity Act for months beginning 90 days or more after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Alice McNulty, Respondent, v. Stephen B. Millspaugh and Others, Appellants.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied. Application for stay denied.
#### Henry Harrison Company, Inc., Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT** 

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2019 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2019-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.           A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2023.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
#### Pat Jrs., Inc., v. Frank Shapiro, Individually and Doing Business as Frank Shapiro Sportswear.

Motion for leave to reargue prior motion or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
§ 1429.1 Transfer of cases to the Board. ( a ) In any representation case under part 1422 of this subchapter in which the Regional Director determines, based upon a stipulation by the parties, that no material issue of fact exists, the Regional Director may transfer the case to the Board; and the Board may decide the case on the basis of the papers alone after having allowed twenty-five (25) days for the filing of briefs. In any unfair labor practice case under part 1423 of this subchapter in which, after the issuance of a complaint, the Regional Director determines, based upon a stipulation by the parties, that no material issue of fact exists, the Regional Director may upon agreement of all parties transfer the case to the Board; and the Board shall decide the case on the basis of the case papers alone after having allowed twenty-five (25) days for the filing of briefs. The Board may remand any such case to the Regional Director if it determines that a material question of fact does exist. Orders of transfer and remand shall be served on all parties.
( b ) In any case under parts 1422 and 1423 of this subchapter in which it appears to the Regional Director that the proceedings raise questions which should be decided by the Board, the Regional Director may, at any time, issue an order transferring the case to the Board for decision or other appropriate action. Such an order shall be served on the parties.
#### Albert Fowler et al., appellees, v. William C. DeWolf, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,067.

Injunction granted to restrain the prosecution by appellant of suits against the purchasers at an auction of hay belonging to appellant and his tenant, and paid for by them to the clerk after notice by appellant not to do so. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Boone county; the Hon. Edward D. Shurtleff, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922.

Charles W. Ferguson, for appellant. Alexander J. Strom, for appellees.

Per Curiam.
#### Carl Emil Moller and Another, Respondents, v. Clare A. Pickard and Another, Appellants.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. Lambert, J., not sitting.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-51034

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Miguel Angel Cuellar-Arreola, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-1813-1

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Miguel Angel Cuellar-Arreola appeals the 24-month, belowguidelines prison sentence and three-year term of supervised release imposed 

following his guilty plea for illegal reentry after removal from the United 

States. He contends that his sentence is unconstitutional because 8 U.S.C. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-51034 Document: 00515910378 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2021
No. 20-51034

2

§ 1326(b) permits a sentence above the otherwise-applicable statutory 

maximum found in § 1326(a) without the requirement that the necessary 

facts be alleged in an indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Cuellar-Arreola requests that we vacate the sentence and remand for 

resentencing under § 1326(a), but he concedes that his arguments are 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27 

(1998), and he seeks to preserve the issues for further review. The 

Government filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance in which it 

agrees that the issue is foreclosed and, in the alternative, a motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief.

In Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 239-47, the Supreme Court held 

that, for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction 

is not a fact that must be alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond 

a reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court 

decisions did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace, 

759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of Alleyne v. United 

States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013)); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 

625-26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000)). Therefore, Cuellar-Arreola’s arguments are foreclosed, 

and summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 

406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED as moot.

Case: 20-51034 Document: 00515910378 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2021
#### In the Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner. Charles Katzenstein, an Attorney, Respondent.

Petitioner moved to punish respondent for contempt by reason of his failure to comply with the subpoenas of this court. On June 13, 1960, the court referred to an Official Referee of the Supreme Court the issue as to whether respondent had deliberately and willfully disobeyed the subpoenas; and, pending the Referee’s report, the court has held the application in abeyance. The Referee, after holding hearings at which respondent defaulted, has now filed his report in which he finds that respondent did deliberately and willfully disobey the subpoenas and in which he recommends that respondent be punished for criminal contempt as prescribed by law (Judiciary Law, § 750, subd. 3; § 751). Petitioner moves to confirm the report. Motion to confirm the Referee’s report granted; application to punish respondent for criminal contempt for disobeying said subpoenas granted. By reason of respondent’s willful disobedience to the subpoenas of this court, he is ordered to he imprisoned for 30 days in the county or city jail in Kings County. He is given leave, however, at any time during said 30-day period, to purge himself by complying fully with such subpoenas. Upon proof of such compliance he will be relieved of further imprisonment. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
*
 ------------------------------------------------ AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          57,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,177
<INVENTORY>                                    141,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381,374
<PP&E>                                          83,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 703,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   703,071
<SALES>                                        516,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,289
<CGS>                                          155,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 23, 2022


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
### §14163b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14163b was editorially reclassified as section 60303 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Wilson                     August 15, 2005
-------------------------------------   Date
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer


                                       28
### §2692. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–211, title I, §104, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 55

Section, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §402, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 89–105, §2(a), Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 427, provided for State standards for variable Federal share of cost.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 91–211, title I, §104, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 55, provided that the repeal by that section is effective with respect to projects under subchapter II of this chapter or part A of subchapter III of this chapter approved after June 30, 1970.
### §297c–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–408, title II, §211(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2078

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §837A, as added Nov. 4, 1988, Pub. L. 100–607, title VII, §714(d), 102 Stat. 3162, authorized appropriations for educational loan repayments for service in certain health facilities.