alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,852
<SECURITIES>                                     1,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,758
<INVENTORY>                                     22,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,864
<PP&E>                                          55,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,400
<BONDS>                                         37,749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           222
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,597
<SALES>                                        144,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,578
<CGS>                                           86,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   806
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (507)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          778
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,793
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 5/10/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A.

MOBILE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING

SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI;

PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S.

BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN

CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA;

ANIMESH NASKAR,

Defendants.

No. C-08-02658 RMW

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

[Re Docket No. 128]

The court has received the parties' proposals for limited discovery pending the outcome of

defendants' motions. The court notes that plaintiffs have failed to specify when they anticipate that

all defendants will have been served, despite the court's order to do so. The court hereby orders the

following:

1. Plaintiffs shall serve defendants with a trade secret disclosure list, identifying the

trade secrets at issue pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2019.210, within 14 days of

this order. 

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 2

2. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures within 30 days after the

trade secret disclosure list has been served. 

3. All other discovery is stayed until the court rules on the various motions currently

pending. See Dkt. Nos. 112, 120, 124, 126. 

DATED: 5/10/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Micah R. Jacobs mjacobs@mbvlaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant IIT:

I. Neel Chatterjee nchatterjee@orrick.com 

Nitin Gambhir ngambhir@orrick.com 

Theresa Ann Sutton tsutton@orrick.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 5/10/10 CCL

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 3 of 3
#### William T. Brueckner et al., appellees, v. Sampson Case, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,324.

Action of forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for plaintiff for possession. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry C. Moran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 8, 1922.

Rehearing denied November 21, 1922.

Ellis & Westbrooks, for appellant; Richard E. Westbrooks, of counsel. Gideon S. Thompson, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Cherkasky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Cherkasky
--------------------------
Michael G. Cherkasky
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
### §§300v to 300v–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 300v to 300v–3, which provided for the establishment, duties, administration, funding, and termination of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, were omitted pursuant to section 300v–3, which provided for the Commission's termination on Dec. 31, 1982. See 48 F.R. 34408.

Section 300v, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVIII, §1801, as added Pub. L. 95–622, title III, §301, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3437; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 100–527, §10(1), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2640, established the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research and directed the President to appoint eleven members.

Section 300v–1, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVIII, §1802, as added Pub. L. 95–622, title III, §301, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3439; amended Pub. L. 96–32, §4, July 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 82, related to duties of the Commission.

Section 300v–2, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVIII, §1803, as added Pub. L. 95–622, title III, §301, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3440, related to administrative provisions.

Section 300v–3, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XVIII, §1804, as added Pub. L. 95–622, title III, §301, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3441, related to authorization of appropriations and termination of the Commission.
#### § 1429.25 Number of copies.

Unless otherwise provided by the Board or the General Counsel, or their designated representatives, as appropriate, or under this subchapter, any document or paper filed with the Board, General Counsel, Administrative Law Judge, Regional Director, or Hearing Officer, as appropriate, under this subchapter, together with any enclosure filed therewith, shall be submitted in an original and four (4) copies. A clean copy capable of being used as an original for purposes such as further reproduction may be substituted for the original.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4346 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act so that labels on packages of 

meat include a statement on whether the meat contains lean finely 

textured beef. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2012 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine (for herself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. LEE

of California, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HOLT, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. SCHIFF, 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act so that labels 

on packages of meat include a statement on whether 

the meat contains lean finely textured beef. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Requiring Easy and 

5 Accurate Labeling of Beef Act’’ or the ‘‘REAL Beef Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4346 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUDING A STATEMENT ON WHETHER MEAT 

2 CONTAINS LEAN FINELY TEXTURED BEEF ON 

3 LABELS. 

4 Section 1(n) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 

5 U.S.C. 601(n)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following para11 graph: 

12 ‘‘(13) if in a package or other container at the 

13 final point of sale it contains low-temperature ren14 dered product, also known as lean finely textured 

15 beef (as such terms are defined by the Secretary), 

16 unless it bears a label stating that it contains such 

17 product.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Research and Special Programs Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 192
          - [Docket No. RSPA-00-7666; Amendment 192-95]
          - RIN 2137-AD54

# AGENCY:

Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the effective date of a final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 15, 2003 (68 FR 69778). That rule requires operators to develop integrity management programs for gas transmission pipelines located where a leak or rupture could do the most harm,                         *i.e.*, could impact high consequence areas (HCAs). The rule requires gas transmission pipeline operators to perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity, to improve data collection, integration and analysis, to repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary, and to implement preventive and mitigative actions. The published effective date was in error. This document corrects the effective date from January 14, 2004, to February 14, 2004, to meet the 60 day requirement for Congressional review of major rules. (5 U.S.C. 801(a)(4).)                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The effective date for the final rule published on December 15, 2003, at 68 FR 69778 is corrected to read February 14, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mike Israni by phone at (202) 366-4571, by fax at (202) 366-4566, or by e-mail at                         *mike.israni@rspa.dot.gov*, regarding the subject matter of the final rule.                    

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 2003.

Samuel G. Bonasso,

Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 04-275 Filed 1-14-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 38 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 5 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document37 Filed01/05/10 Page1 of 5
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 38 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 5 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document37 Filed01/05/10 Page2 of 5
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 38 Filed 01/05/10 Page 3 of 5 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document37 Filed01/05/10 Page3 of 5
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 38 Filed 01/05/10 Page 4 of 5 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document37 Filed01/05/10 Page4 of 5
Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document37 Filed01/05/10 Page5 of 5

January 5

Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 38 Filed 01/05/10 Page 5 of 5
#### § 191.23 Disputes.

Any dispute between the Office and eligible persons concerning (a) whether medical or health care is required in a given case, (b) whether required care is incident to the hostage taking, or (c) whether the cost for any authorized care is reasonable and customary, shall be referred to the Medical Director, Department of State and the Foreign Service for a determination. If the person bringing the claim is not satisfied with the decision of the Medical Director, the dispute shall be referred to a medical board composed of three physicians, one appointed by the Medical Director, one by the eligible person and the third by the first two members. A majority decision by the board shall be binding on all parties.
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2013filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:October 29, 2013By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section 3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. No. 94-409), 5 U.S.C. 552b: 

# Agency Holding Meeting:

 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

# Date and Time:

 December 15, 2004 (Within a relatively short time after the Commission's open meeting on December 15, 2004). 

# Place:

 Room 3M 4A/B, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, Enforcement Related Matters, and Security of Regulated Facilities. 

# Contact Person for more Information:

 Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Telephone (202) 502-8400. 

Chairman Wood and Commissioners Brownell, Kelliher, and Kelly voted to hold a closed meeting on December 15, 2004. The certification of the General Counsel explaining the action closing the meeting is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public reference Room at 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426. 

The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the Commission's Secretary and her assistant, the General Counsel and members of her staff, and a stenographer are expected to attend the meeting. Other staff members from the Commission's program offices who will advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be present. 

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-27400 Filed 12-9-04; 5:07 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### §2992b. Administration

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prohibit interagency funding agreements made between the Administration and other agencies of the Federal Government for the development and implementation of specific grants or projects.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §813, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title VIII, §822(14), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1299.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2992b, Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §813, formerly §812, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §11, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2327; amended Pub. L. 95–568, §17(a)(41), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2443; Pub. L. 98–558, title X, §1003, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2905; renumbered §813, Pub. L. 100–175, title V, §502(3), Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 973, related to administration, delegation of authority, and interagency funding agreements, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–375, title VIII, §822(14), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1299.

Another prior section 2992b, Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §812, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §110, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 723, related to support of full-time volunteers, providing in: subsec. (a) for stipend and allowances; subsec. (b) for payment upon completion of term and advancement of accrued stipend; and subsec. (c) for counseling, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 93–113, title VI, §603, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 417.

A prior section 813 of Pub. L. 88–452 was renumbered section 815 and is classified to section 2992c of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LUKE BRUGNARA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 08-0222 WHA

No. CR 14-0306 WHA

ORDER RE RETURN

OF BRONZE DEGAS

If the defendant in any way proposes to return the bronze Degas in question to Rose Long

as a way to reduce his potential sentence, then it should be done promptly and unconditionally

and under circumstances wherein the chain of custody and integrity of the artwork can be

verified by Ms. Long as well as by any expert she designates. This order does not reach the

question of whether any such return would warrant consideration in sentencing. It simply

requires that any such action be done promptly if it is to be done before sentencing. This is

without prejudice to a mandatory restitution order requiring its return at judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00222-WHA Document 513 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 5336.2 – SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION                                   **Parent topic:** Part 5336 - Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts5336.208 Concurrent Performance of Firm-Fixed-Price and Other Types of Construction Contracts       See MP5301.601(a)(i).5336.209 Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms       See MP5301.601(a)(i). Submit a copy of the approval to SAF/AQCA Workflow.5336.213-2 Presolicitation Notices       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5336.270 Expediting construction contracts       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5336.272 Prequalification of Sources       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stephen Pelow, Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johnnie Solomon, Appellant.

— Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include November 1960 Term, on condition that appellant’s brief is filed and served on or before November 2; respondent directed to file and serve printed brief by November 17.
§ 229.506 (Item 506) Dilution. Where common equity securities are being registered and there is substantial disparity between the public offering price and the effective cash cost to officers, directors, promoters and affiliated persons of common equity acquired by them in transactions during the past five years, or which they have the right to acquire, and the registrant is not subject to the reporting requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act immediately prior to filing of the registration statement, there shall be included a comparison of the public contribution under the proposed public offering and the effective cash contribution of such persons. In such cases, and in other instances where common equity securities are being registered by a registrant that has had losses in each of its last three fiscal years and there is a material dilution of the purchasers' equity interest, the following shall be disclosed: ( a ) The net tangible book value per share before and after the distribution;
( b ) The amount of the increase in such net tangible book value per share attributable to the cash payments made by purchasers of the shares being offered; and
( c ) The amount of the immediate dilution from the public offering price which will be absorbed by such purchasers.