alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

ARCELLX, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Arcellx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lance Thibault, Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: 	March 24, 2022

 

/s/ Lance Thibault		

Lance Thibault

Interim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Arcellx, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

-1-

 FILENAME   \* MERGEFORMAT Normal.dotm

----
#### Paul Schroeder, trading as Paul Schroeder & Company, appellant, v. H. H. McKenzie, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,645.

Action to recover real estate commissions. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 30, 1922.

Rehearing denied November 13, 1922.

Winters, Price & Stevens, for appellant; George M. Stevens and Melvin L. Griffith, of counsel. Mergentheim, Altheimer & Mayer, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE NINE
MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,671,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,926,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,427,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,415,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,613,723
<PP&E>                                      20,515,664
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,801,742
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             195,561,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,734,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,797
<OTHER-SE>                                  78,778,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               195,561,900
<SALES>                                     28,668,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           159,869,127
<CGS>                                       10,419,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              135,119,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,491,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,408,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                   920,183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,487,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,647,512
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   840,391
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
### §300x–52. Requirement of reports and audits by States

#### (a) Report

A funding agreement for a grant under section 300x or 300x–21 of this title is that the State involved will submit to the Secretary a report in such form and containing such information as the Secretary determines (after consultation with the States) to be necessary for securing a record and a description of—

(1) the purposes for which the grant received by the State for the preceding fiscal year under the program involved were expended and a description of the activities of the State under the program;

(2) the recipients of amounts provided in the grant; and

(3) the amount provided to each recipient in the previous fiscal year.

#### (b) Audits

A funding agreement for a grant under section 300x or 300x–21 of this title is that the State will, with respect to the grant, comply with chapter 75 of title 31.

#### (c) Availability to public

A funding agreement for a grant under section 300x or 300x–21 of this title is that the State involved will—

(1) make copies of the reports and audits described in this section available for public inspection within the State; and

(2) provide copies of the report under subsection (a), upon request, to any interested person (including any public agency).

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIX, §1942, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title II, §203(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 403; amended Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §122(e), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3837; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1246, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 117–328 added par. (3).

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–316 struck out "and the Comptroller General" after "with the States" in introductory provisions.
### §10803. Allotments

The Secretary shall make allotments under this subchapter to eligible systems to establish and administer systems—

(1) which meet the requirements of section 10805 of this title; and

(2) which are designed to—

(A) protect and advocate the rights of individuals with mental illness; and

(B) investigate incidents of abuse and neglect of individuals with mental illness if the incidents are reported to the system or if there is probable cause to believe that the incidents occurred.

(Pub. L. 99–319, title I, §103, May 23, 1986, 100 Stat. 479; Pub. L. 102–173, §10(2), Nov. 27, 1991, 105 Stat. 1219.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Par. (2). Pub. L. 102–173 substituted "individuals with mental illness" for "mentally ill individuals" in two places.
###### Editorial Note on Part 143

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 143 appear at 68 FR 51360, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 143.1 What is the purpose of the age discrimination regulations?

The purpose of these regulations is to set out the policies and procedures for the three foreign affairs agencies (State, USICA and AID) under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and the government-wide age discrimination regulations at 45 CFR part 90 (published at 44 FR 33768, June 12, 1979). The Act and the government-wide regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities in the United States receiving federal financial assistance. The Act and the government-wide regulations permit federally assisted programs and activities, and recipients of federal funds, to continue to use age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and the government-wide regulations.
EXHIBIT 35.1





World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB







I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of October 9, 2019 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Select Auto Trust 2019-A, as Issuing Entity, World
Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement,
has been made under my supervision.



(ii)To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under
the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 6, 2020.





| | WORLD
OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.





By:
/s/Joseph Venezia

Name:
Joseph Venezia

Title:
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                            
| |                                                                                                            
| |                                                                                                            
| |
#### Frederick Partie, appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 27,238.

Action for personal injuries received by plaintiff while attempting to board defendants’ car. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook comity; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. . Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Reversed and remanded.

Thomson, P. J., dissenting.

Opinion filed November 29, 1922.

Charles Le Roy Brown, for appellants; John R. Guilliams, Frank L. Kriete and Warner H. Robinson, of counsel. Charles C. Spencer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water levels in theUnited States. Southeastern states.**
 
1956-58 | 1959-63 | 1964-68 | 1969-73 | 1974
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104686
 
August 22, 2019
Subpart 5334.2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM               **Parent topic:** Part 5334 - Major System Acquisition5334.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause       If an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) waiver is obtained in accordance with the Adaptive Acquisition Framework Document Identification Tool (AAFDID) EVMS Application Requirements Table, contracting officers may omit the use of EVMS provisions and clauses prescribed for use in DFARS 234.203. The approved EVMS waiver must be included in the contract file.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Lacy et al., Defendants, and Ricardo Monti, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Donald R. Mastropietro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Donald R.
      Mastropietro


Donald
      R.
      Mastropietro


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      17,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
§ 224.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ shall issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
#### § 120.61 Person.

*Person* means a natural person as well as a corporation, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other entity, organization or group, including governmental entities. If a provision in this subchapter does not refer exclusively to a foreign person or U.S. person, then it refers to both.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RELATED CASE ORDER 

A Notice of Related Cases has been filed that the following cases are related within the 

meaning of Crim. L.R. 8-1(b): 

CR08-25 WHA USA v. Remsen Benedict 

CR16-309 VC US v. Remsen Benedict 

 

ORDER 

The time for filing a statement to support or oppose the Notice has passed. On the basis of 

the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the 

cases: 

[ ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b). 

[X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b). I find, however, that 

reassignment to me of the action(s) currently assigned to another judge is not 

warranted. 

[ ] ARE RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b). Pursuant to Crim. L.R. 8-1(e), 

the Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the later-filed action to the undersigned. 

Counsel are instructed that all future filings are to bear the initials immediately 

after the case number. All matters presently scheduled for hearing in the reassigned 

case(s) are vacated and must be renoticed for hearing before the undersigned. 

DATED: July 13, 2016. 

______________________________________ 

WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:08-cr-00025-WHA Document 104 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 1
### §15095. Designation of the lead entity

#### (a) Designation

The Chief Executive Officer of a State that desires to receive a grant under section 15093 of this title, shall designate the office or entity (referred to in this subchapter as the "lead entity") responsible for—

(1) submitting the application described in section 15094 of this title on behalf of the State;

(2) administering and supervising the use of the amounts made available under the grant;

(3) coordinating efforts related to and supervising the preparation of the application;

(4) coordinating the planning, development, implementation (or expansion and enhancement), and evaluation of a statewide system of family support services for families of children with disabilities among public agencies and between public agencies and private agencies, including coordinating efforts related to entering into interagency agreements;

(5) coordinating efforts related to the participation by families of children with disabilities in activities carried out under a grant made under this subchapter; and

(6) submitting the report described in section 15097 of this title on behalf of the State.

#### (b) Qualifications

In designating the lead entity, the Chief Executive Officer may designate—

(1) an office of the Chief Executive Officer;

(2) a commission appointed by the Chief Executive Officer;

(3) a public agency;

(4) a council established under Federal or State law; or

(5) another appropriate office, agency, or entity.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title II, §206, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1731.)
#### § 237.16 Governing law.

This Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary

December 17, 2010, 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM

Room S-12100, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Beyond Pesticides: Jay Feldman, Nichelle Harriott

Participants

Physicians for Social Responsibility: Kristen Welker-Hood

Chemical Sensitivity Disorders Association: Lawrence Plumlee

Food and Water Watch: Kathy Dolan

The Endocrine Disruptor Exchange: Theo Colborn, Lynn Carroll

National Association of Clean Water Agencies: Cynthia Finley

Zelle Hoffmann: Perry Wallace

Informed Green Solutions: Carol Westinghouse

EPA: Vicki Dellarco, Jennifer Mclain, Joan Harrigan-Farrelly, Bob Perlis, Steven 

Bradbury, Diana Eignor, Tim McMahon

On Friday, December 17, 2010, AD hosted a meeting with Beyond Pesticides and other 

groups listed above to discuss the petition to ban triclosan that was submitted to EPA by 

Beyond Pesticides and Food & Water Watch. The petitioners submitted an Agenda in 

which they requested discussion on the possible outcome(s) of the petition, extension of 

the comment period on the petition, collaboration with the Food and Drug 

Administration, existing and new biomonitoring data on triclosan occurrence in the 

environment, EPA’s process for examining triclosan under the various regulatory statutes 

governing EPA program offices, and any new data examining endocrine effects and 

effects on the developing fetus as well as other susceptible subpopulations. 

Summary

In response to the submission of the request for extension of the comment period, EPA 

published a notice of availability in the Federal Register dated February 2, 2011, 

extending the comment period for the triclosan petition for an additional 60 days. 

Next Steps
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27699]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-030-1020-PG; G 05-0036]

Teleconference Meeting Notice for the John Day/Snake Resource 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Vale District, Interior.

ACTION: Teleconference meeting notice for the John Day/Snake Resource 
Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council (JDSRAC) will 
conduct a public meeting by teleconference on Wednesday, January 12, 
2005, from 7 to 9 p.m. Pacific Time. The meeting is open to the public; 
however, teleconference lines are limited. Please call or contact Peggy 
Diegan at the Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918, 
(541) 473-3144, to obtain the dial-in number. During the 
teleconference, the JDSRAC will come to consensus on comments on the 
Blue Mountain Forest Plan Revision draft vision document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public wishing 
further information concerning the meeting or who wishes to submit oral 
or written comments should contact Debbie Lyons at the above address 
(541) 473-6218 or e-mail [email protected]. Comments must be in 
writing to Debbie Lyons by January 4, 2005. For teleconference call 
meetings, opportunities for oral comment will be limited to no more 
than five minutes per speaker and no more than fifteen minutes total.

    Dated: December 13, 2004.
Larry Frazier,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 04-27699 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
```