alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells FargoBank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
### §300jj–15. Application and use of adopted standards and implementation specifications by Federal agencies

For requirements relating to the application and use by Federal agencies of the standards and implementation specifications adopted under section 300jj–14 of this title, see section 17901 of this title.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXX, §3005, as added Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title XIII, §13101, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 241.)
### §3796ll. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ll was editorially reclassified as section 10531 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Brown, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 322]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered March 29, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied both the defendant’s and his counsel’s motions, prior to voir dire, to substitute counsel based upon an alleged grievance filed by the defendant against his trial counsel *(see, People v Lashway,*187 AD2d 747). Whether to allow a defendant to substitute counsel is largely within the discretion of the Trial Judge *(see, People v Arroyave,*49 NY2d 264). The defendant must show good cause for the substitution, and the motion must not be made merely as a dilatory tactic *(see, People v Arroyave, supra).*Under the facts of this case, the action of the defendant was merely a dilatory tactic.

The Supreme Court properly refused to grant the defendant’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror. Where there is evidence that a prospective juror’s state of mind is likely to preclude him or her from rendering an impartial verdict *(see,*CPL 270.20 [1] [b]), the juror must state unequivocally that he or she would be able to render a verdict based solely on the evidence adduced at trial *(see, People v Torpey,*63 NY2d 361, 367; *People v Blyden,*55 NY2d 73, 77-78 *People v Davis,*248 AD2d 399). Here, the juror’s responses, taken as a whole, established the necessary unequivocal declaration of impartiality *(see, People v Torpey,*supra;*People v Blyden, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

FURTHER ORDER RE

STATUS OF SETTLEMENT 

The parties previously advised the Court that by close of business on Tuesday, May 11,

2010, they hoped to file a stipulation of settlement for the California class in this matter and a

motion for preliminary settlement, as well as a revised formula for some federal claims class

members to opt out late without sinking the entire settlement. However, no further submissions

have been received. The parties should submit the foregoing materials by NOON ON MONDAY,

MAY 17, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 765 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 1
### §3146. Regulations on relative needs and allocations

In promulgating rules, regulations, and procedures for assistance under this subchapter, the Secretary shall ensure that—

(1) the relative needs of eligible areas are given adequate consideration by the Secretary, as determined based on, among other relevant factors—

(A) the severity of the rates of unemployment in the eligible areas and the duration of the unemployment;

(B) the income levels and the extent of underemployment in eligible areas; and

(C) the outmigration of population from eligible areas and the extent to which the outmigration is causing economic injury in the eligible areas;

(2) allocations of assistance under this subchapter are prioritized to ensure that the level of economic distress of an area, rather than a preference for a geographic area or a specific type of economic distress, is the primary factor in allocating the assistance;

(3)(A) rural and urban economically distressed areas are not harmed by the establishment or implementation by the Secretary of a private sector leveraging goal for a project under this subchapter;

(B) any private sector leveraging goal established by the Secretary does not prohibit or discourage grant applicants under this subchapter from public works in, or economic development of, rural or urban economically distressed areas; and

(C) the relevant Committees of Congress are notified prior to making any changes to any private sector leveraging goal; and

(4) grants made under this subchapter promote job creation and will have a high probability of meeting or exceeding applicable performance requirements established in connection with the grants.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3604; amended Pub. L. 108–373, title II, §204, Oct. 27, 2004, 118 Stat. 1761.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 108–373 added pars. (3) and (4).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
Specimen Common Stock Certificate



  

 

 

  







  

 

 

  
 The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

											
	 TEN COM
	  	 – as tenants in common
	  	 UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT–
	  	 	  	 Custodian
	  	 
						
	 TEN ENT
	  	 – as tenants by the entireties
	  	 	  	 


(Cust)
	  	 	  	 (Minor)

						
	 JT TEN
	  	 – as joint tenants with right
	  	 	  	 

 under
Uniform
Gifts to Minors
	  	 	  	 
						
	 	  	 of survivorship and not as
	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 
						
	 	  	 tenants in common
	  	 	  	 Act
	  	 	  	 
						
	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 (State)
	  	 

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in
the above list. 

					
	 For value received,
	  	
hereby
sell,
assign
and
transfer
unto
	 
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	  	 	 	 
	 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE
	  	 	 	 
	 Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint
	  	 	 	 
	 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.
	  	 	 	 

 Dated, 

					
	 	  	 NOTICE: THE
SIGNATURE TO
THIS
ASSIGNMENT
MUST
CORRESPOND
WITH
	 
	 	  	  
 
 
 
 
 
	 THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE OF
THE
CERTIFICATE,
IN
	
  
  
  
  
  
  

	 	  	  
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
EVERY
PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT
ALTERATION
OR
ENLARGEMENT,
OR
	
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


	 	  	  
 
	 ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.
	   
  

	 SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
	  	 	 	 
	 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
	  	 	 	 
	 INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
	  	 	 	 
	 AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
	  	 	 	 
	 GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF JEFFERY M. JACKSON**

 

On this day, Sabre HoldingsCorporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission aQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending, June 30, 2004 (the“Report”).

 

This written statement accompanied theReport.

 

I,Jeffery M. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifythat:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ JEFFERY M. JACKSON                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffery  M. Jackson                                   |   |
| Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August  6, 2004                                       |   |

 

----
df Pathfinder
Reservoir

Seminoe
Reservoir

Medicine Bow

EIWATER ._}-—-L..1..

CARBON

SWE!

RIBW 97. 96 95 94

3 F . ‘ 0 10 20 40 60 80 100
4 Developed Recreation Sites m Undeveloped Recreation Sites
i Kilometers
D1 Rim Lake U1 Big Creek
D2 Teton Reservoir U2 Nine Mile Hill 9 _5 10 20 30 40 50
D3 Encampment River Miles

D4 Bennett Peak
D5 = Corral Creek

D6 Dugway Map 3-7

D7 Prior Flat A A
Recreation Sites

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
### §3030d–21. Purposes

The purposes of this part are—

(1) to reduce hunger, food insecurity, and malnutrition;

(2) to promote socialization of older individuals; and

(3) to promote the health and well-being of older individuals by assisting such individuals to gain access to nutrition and other disease prevention and health promotion services to delay the onset of adverse health conditions resulting from poor nutritional health or sedentary behavior.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title III, §330, as added Pub. L. 109–365, title III, §312, Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2547; amended Pub. L. 116–131, title I, §106(2), Mar. 25, 2020, 134 Stat. 244.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Par. (1). Pub. L. 116–131 substituted ", food insecurity, and malnutrition" for "and food insecurity".
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 41.108 Medical examination. ( a ) *Requirements for medical examination.* An applicant for a nonimmigrant visa shall be required to take a medical examination if: ( 1 ) The alien is an applicant for a K nonimmigrant visa as a fiance(e) of a U.S. citizen or as the child of such an applicant; or,
( 2 ) The alien is seeking admission for medical treatment and the consular officer considers a medical examination advisable; or,
( 3 ) The consular officer has reason to believe that a medical examination might disclose that the alien is medically ineligible to receive a visa.
( b ) *Examination by panel physician.* The required examination, which must be carried out in accordance with United States Public Health Service regulations, shall be conducted by a physician selected by the alien from a panel of physicians approved by the consular officer or, if the alien is in the United States, by a medical officer of the United States Public Health Service or by a contract physician from a list of physicians approved by the DHS for the examination of INA 245 adjustment of status applicants.
( c ) *Panel physician facility requirements.* A consular officer may not include the name of a physician on the panel of physicians referred to in paragraph (b) of this section unless the physician has facilities to perform required serological and X-ray tests or is in a position to refer applicants to a qualified laboratory for such tests.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eon Shepherd, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 899]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 26, 1999 *(People v Shepherd,*260 AD2d 649), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered September 5, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case 3:08-cv-03241-CRB Document 6 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-03241-CRB Document 6 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 39

 To delist the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered 
                          Species Act of 1973.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To delist the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered 
                          Species Act of 1973.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Polar Bear Delisting Act''.

SEC. 2. DELISTING OF POLAR BEAR AS THREATENED SPECIES.

    The determination by the United States Fish and Wildlife of the 
threatened status for the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) under the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), published May 
15, 2008 (73 Fed. Reg. 28211 et seq.), and the listing of such species 
as a threatened species under that Act pursuant to such determination, 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 221.41 Arbitration.

Any controversy or claim between A.I.D. and any noteholder arising out of this Guarantee shall be settled by arbitration to be held in Washington, DC in accordance with the then prevailing rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.
#### Robert Foxluger et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 34544.)

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as poor persons denied. Appellants’ attention is directed to rule VII of the rules of this court. Nathan W. Hankin, attorney at law, of Binghamton, New York is hereby assigned to prosecute the appeal for appellants.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frances E. Kelly, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of the crime of abortion.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
#### § 219.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 219.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
#### Power Authority of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Paul K. Wustrack et al., Respondents.

Final order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from part of final order of Niagara Special Term, resettling order, granting an additional allowance of 5% upon the amount awarded in a condemnation proceeding.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

NOTICE SETTING

STATUS CONFERENCE

The Court shall hold a status conference at 8:00 A.M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2010, in

Courtroom 9. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01733-WHA Document 55 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 1
SUPPLEMENT TO FOURTH
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN 

    AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY
NOTE

    


    THIS SUPPLEMENT TO FOURTH AMENDMENT AND
RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE by and between BLINK COUTURE,
INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC, an
Oklahoma limited liability company (the “Payee”) entered into as of July 31,
2010, supplements and amends that certain Fourth Amendment and Restatement of
Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated as of March 15, 2010 (the “Amendment
and Note Restatement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment and Note
Restatement.

    


    For value received, the Maker and Payee
hereby agree, effective as of the date hereof, that the following provisions
shall supplement and become part of the Amendment and Note
Restatement:

    


    1.           Additional
Advances.  The Parties hereby agree that during the period from
May 1, 2010 through July 31, 2010, the Payee has made additional advances to the
Maker, in the aggregate amount of $15,377, in payment of the Maker’s operating
expenses during that period, so that effective as of July 31, 2010, the total
outstanding principal amount due and payable pursuant to the Note is
$156,502.

    


    2.           No
Further Changes; Full Force and Effect.  The additional
advances described in Paragraph 1 above reflect all changes to the Amendment and
Note Restatement. All other terms of the Amendment and Note Restatement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect, unless and until further
supplemented or amended hereafter.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused this Supplement to Fourth Amendment and
Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note to be duly executed and
delivered as of the day and year first written above.

    


    
      
        	 
      	
                BLINK
      COUTURE, INC.

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Lawrence Field

              
	 
      	 
      	
                 Name:
      Lawrence Field

              
	 
      	 
      	
                 Title:
      President & CEO

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                REGENT
      PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Anurag Agarwal

              
	 
      	 
      	
                 Name:  Anurag
      Agarwal

              
	 
      	 
      	
                 Title:
      Managing Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 04-3808; MM Docket No. 01-120; RM-10126] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Long Nine, Inc. directed to the                         *Report and Order*                         in this proceeding.                         *See*67 FR 16652, April 8, 2002. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2177. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the                     *Memorandum Opinion and Order*                     in MM Docket No. 01-120 adopted December 1, 2004, and released December 3, 2004. The full text of this decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center at Portals ll, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *http://www.BCPIWEB.com.*                     The  Commission will not send a copy of this                     *Memorandum Opinion and Order*                     pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,                     *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the aforementioned petition for reconsideration was denied.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 04-27797 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 213.31 Termination—general.

The CFO may terminate collection actions including accrued interest, penalties and administrative costs, where the debt principal does not exceed $100,000. If the debt exceeds $100,000, USAID obtains the approval of DOJ in order to terminate further collection actions. Unless otherwise provided for by DOJ regulations or procedures, requests to terminate collection on debts in excess of $100,000 are referred to the Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, for approval.

[67 FR 47258, July 18, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 31145, June 11, 2021]