alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.44 Vesting in USAID of title to commodities. ( a ) *Vesting upon order of USAID* USAID may direct that title to USAID-financed commodities in transit to a cooperating country shall be vested in USAID if, in the opinion of USAID, such action is necessary to assure compliance with the provisions or purposes of any act of Congress. ( 1 ) *Rights of USAID upon vesting of title.* In accordance with instructions by USAID, the borrower/grantee, supplier, and bank shall transfer such negotiable bills of lading, suppliers' invoices, packing lists, inspection certificates or other designated documents relating to the commodities as are in, or may come into, their possession.
( 2 ) *Diversion of commodities.* USAID may direct the master or operator of a vessel or an inland carrier carrying the commodities to divert them away from the port or other destination specified in the shipping documents and to deliver them at such other destination as USAID may designate.
( b ) *Financial responsibility of USAID under vesting order.* ( 1 ) USAID will reimburse a supplier who has not already received payment under the purchase contract for all commodities with respect to which USAID has taken title under a vesting order.
( 2 ) USAID will assume the responsibility for any extra costs (including the costs of marine insurance and handling) which are incurred as a result of a diversion. Such costs shall not exceed diversion charges as per tariff (liner shipments) or contract of affreightment (charters), and shall include only those deviation insurance and extra handling costs which are actually incurred.
( 3 ) USAID shall incur no liability to the borrower/grantee, the importer, or to the approved applicant by reason of any order which vests in USAID title to commodities, or by reason of any request for the diversion of commodities.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0455

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NEIL LYNN NUNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including Junes 29, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 2 2023

06/02/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0455
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates: 1940: population and housing: families: tenure and rent: regions,cities of 1,000,000 or more, and metropolitan districts of 500,000 or more**
 
Parts: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/8
Item Number:0198 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001103936
 
August 8, 2019
November 22

, 2011



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BREANNA MARIE BAKER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 08

- 00779

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court

orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this app eal,

and that this decision be certified below for observance.
# Subpart 3431.1—Applicability

**Parent topic:**PART 3431—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

## 3431.101 Objectives.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 31.101.
5306.304 Approval of the Justification

(a)

Justification Value Approval Authority Delegability

< $750K Chief of the Contracting Office

Delegable to contracting

officer, consistent with warrant

level

> $750K < $15M Procuring Activity Competition

and Commercial Advocate Not further delegable

> $15M < $100M PEO (General Officer or civilian

SES) / Head of Procuring Activity*

Delegable to General Officer or

civilian SES

> $100M SAF/AQ or SAF/SQ Not further delegable

* The Commander or Director for the locations listed in 5306.501(a)(1) and (2) serves as the Head of

Procuring Activity and is the J&A approval authority for programs that are not part of a PEO

portfolio. AFPEO/CM is the J&A approval authority for services that are not part of a Systems PEO

portfolio.

(4) J&As for actions exceeding $100M must be coordinated with the PEO/Head of Procuring Activity

and the cognizant HCA prior to SAF/AQ or SAF/SQ approval (See MP5301.601(a)(i) for staffing and

coordination instructions). Changes recommended during the staffing process for SPE approval must

be adjudicated by the contracting officer in coordination with the cognizant HCA prior to submitting

the J&A to the SPE for approval.

(e) Changes After J&A Approval: Regardless of dollar value, if a proposed change is for a new work

outside the scope of the original J&A, submit a new J&A to the appropriate approving official based

on the value of the new work. New work should not commence until the J&A is approved unless

authorized in accordance with FAR 6.302-2, Unusual and Compelling Urgency.

(1) Before contract award, if the dollar value is expected to exceed the authority of the original J&A

approving official, submit an amended J&A to the appropriate approving official. Clearly identify the

dollar increase from the approved J&A.

(2) After contract award, if the dollar value of an in-scope change exceeds the authority of the

original J&A approving official, submit an amended J&A to the appropriate approving official. Clearly

identify the dollar increase from the approved J&A.

(3) A new or amended J&A is not require for an increase in the estimated dollar value of in-scope

work that does not exceed the authority of the original J&A approving official.

SUBPART 5306.5 — COMPETITION ADVOCATES
Parent topic: Subpart 5306.3 - OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
§ 1510.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Personnel Officer, Office of Administration and Finance, shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to Personnel Officer, Office of Administration and Finance, African Development Foundation, 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20036.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate Government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1510.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[53 FR 25883, 25885, July 8, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 25883, July 8, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 202

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 202 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 202.10 Participation by faith-based organizations.

The procedures established under this part shall be administered in compliance with the standards set forth in part 205, Participation by Religious Organizations in USAID Programs, of this chapter.

[69 FR 61723, Oct. 20, 2004]
Exhibit 32



Certification



Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  | 
|November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach   
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



72
#### § 38.750 Core Principle 14.

The board of trade shall establish and enforce rules regarding, and provide facilities for alternative dispute resolution as appropriate for, market participants and any market intermediaries.
#### § 1508.810 When does a debarment take effect?

A debarment is not effective until the debarring official issues a decision. The debarring official does not issue a decision until the respondent has had an opportunity to contest the proposed debarment.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rotate Black, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Paulsen, Chief Executuve Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                                                                  |                 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|Date: April 15, 2009 | By:                                                              | /s/ John Paulsen
|                     | John Paulsen
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 1508.425 When do I check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified? As an agency official, you must check to see if a person is excluded or disqualified before you— ( a ) Enter into a primary tier covered transaction;
( b ) Approve a principal in a primary tier covered transaction;
( c ) Approve a lower tier participant if agency approval of the lower tier participant is required; or
( d ) Approve a principal in connection with a lower tier transaction if agency approval of the principal is required.
§ 229.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
df Pathtinder
Reservoir

Medicine Bow

"CARBON 7

SWEETWATER

| | Crucial Year-Long 0 10 20 40 60 80 100
Winter/Yearlong Kilometers
WA Spring/Summer/Fall (ae —— "a ——" es
| Yearlong Miles

Map 2-55
Bighorn Sheep Habitat
and Lambing Areas

HM Lambing Areas

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                         20,217
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    101,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,273
<PP&E>                                         2,046,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 189,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,404,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,020
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    469,233
<COMMON>                                       7,061,684
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,899,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,404,360
<SALES>                                        207,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,070
<CGS>                                          187,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,002,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,074,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,074,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,074,047)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)



</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4137 

To make permanent the exclusion from gross income for employer-provided 

educational assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2012 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. NEAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To make permanent the exclusion from gross income for 

employer-provided educational assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Educational 

5 Assistance Act of 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4137 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE MADE PERMANENT. 

3 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

4 Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to section 411 

5 of such Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1508.725 How much time do I have to contest a suspension? ( a ) As a respondent you or your representative must either send, or make rrangements to appear and present, the information and argument to the suspending official within 30 days after you receive the Notice of Suspension.
( b ) We consider the notice to be received by you— ( 1 ) When delivered, if we mail the notice to the last known street address, or five days after we send it if the letter is undeliverable;
( 2 ) When sent, if we send the notice by facsimile or five days after we send it if the facsimile is undeliverable; or
( 3 ) When delivered, if we send the notice by e-mail or five days after we send it if the e-mail is undeliverable.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 6, 2018

Order 

Clerk

July 6, 2018

156161(66)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee,

SC: 156161

v COA: 331594

Wayne CC: 12-007733-FH

WILBERT JOSEPH McKEEVER,

Defendant-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee/cross-appellant to 

extend the time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief 

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 9, 2018.
§ 1508.450 What action may I take if a primary tier participant fails to disclose the information required under § 1508.335? If you as an agency official determine that a participant failed to disclose information, as required by § 1508.335, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with you, you may— ( a ) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
( b ) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
#### § 303.34 Country of origin in mail order advertising.

When a textile fiber product is advertised in any mail order catalog or mail order promotional material, the description of such product shall contain a clear and conspicuous statement that the product was either made in U.S.A., imported, or both. Other words or phrases with the same meaning may be used. The statement of origin required by this section shall not be inconsistent with the origin labeling of the product being advertised.

[50 FR 15107, Apr. 17, 1985]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Stanley L. Cohen, Appellant, and Sidney G. Spero, Respondent.

Order, dated July 12, 1960, denying petitioner’s application for a stay of the arbitration proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange
Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Claes Glassell, the Chief Executive Officer of Cerus Corporation (the Company) and Kevin D. Green, the Chief Accounting Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 12th day of May, 2010.



/s/ Claes GlassellClaes GlassellChief Executive Officer/s/ Kevin D. GreenKevin D. GreenChief Accounting Officer




43
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9**
**- 7939** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,

v.

ANYA LEE JACKSON ,
Defendant

– Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. (4 : 0 7

- c r
- 00 9 0 2

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : June 24 , 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, a nd DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anya Lee Jacks on , Appellant Pro Se

. Ro se Mary Sheppard Parham Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Anya Lee Jackson appeals the district court ’s order

de nying Jackson ’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Jackson , No. 4 :0 7

- cr
00 9 02

- TLW

- 1 (D. S.C. filed June 30, 2009; entered July 1, 200 9 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED