76006 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 2004 / Notices 

Winnebago Tribe); Iowa Tribe of Kansas 

and Nebraska; Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; 

Lower Sioux Indian Community in the 

State of Minnesota; Otoe-Missouria 

Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma; Prairie 

Island Indian Community in the State of 

Minnesota; Sac and Fox Nation of 

Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska; Sac 

and Fox Nation, Oklahoma; Sac and Fox 

Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; 

Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux 

Community of Minnesota; Upper Sioux 

Community, Minnesota; and Winnebago 

Tribe of Nebraska.

Information about cultural items. In 

1952, National Park Service archeologist 

Paul L. Beaubien removed human 

remains representing a minimum of 12 

individuals from Mound 57 at Effigy 

Mounds National Monument, 

Allamakee County, IA, during an 

authorized National Park Service 

excavation. At the time of removal, the 

site was on Federal land.

The cultural material recovered from 

Mound 57 was identified as Middle 

Woodland (1700-2200 B.P.). Human 

remains from Mound 57 were examined 

in 1952-53 by Alton K. Fisher, then 

Professor of Dentistry at the University 

of Iowa. Archival records at Effigy 

Mounds National Monument indicate 

Dr. Fisher took the remains to Iowa City 

for analysis, and in 1953 requested that 

Mr. Beaubien pick up the remains. No 

further information is available about 

the disposition of the human skeletal 

material following Dr. Fisher’s request. 

Recently, the human remains were 

returned to Effigy Mounds National 

Monument. A detailed assessment of the 

human remains was made by the Burials 

Program, Iowa Office of the State 

Archaeologist on behalf of the National 

Park Service during the summer of 

2003. The human remains represent 12 

individuals distinguished primarily by 

dentition and fragmented or incomplete 

cranial and postcranial remains. Seven 

adults and five sub-adults are 

represented. No known individuals 

were identified. The three associated 

funerary objects are one copper breast 

plate, one sandstone drill pivot, and one 

piece of obsidian.

Officials of the National Park Service 

determined that a relationship of shared 

group identity could not reasonably be 

traced between the human remains and 

associated funerary objects and any 

present-day Indian tribe. Pursuant to 25 

U.S.C. 3001 (3)(A), the three objects 

described above are reasonably believed 

to have been placed with or near 

individual human remains at the time of 

death or later as part of the death rite 

or ceremony.

According to the Review Committee’s 

charter, the Review Committee is 

responsible for recommending specific 

actions for disposition of culturally 

unidentifiable human remains. In July 

2004, Effigy Mounds National 

Monument requested that the Review 

Committee recommend repatriation of 

the 12 culturally unidentifiable human 

remains and associated funerary objects 

to the tribes listed above in SUMMARY as 

the aboriginal occupants of the lands 

encompassing the present-day Effigy 

Mounds National Monument. Effigy 

Mounds National Monument is located 

within the area covered by the Treaty of 

September 21, 1832 between the Sauk 

and Fox tribes and the United States 

(Stat. L. VII 374), and is located within 

the area covered by the November 23, 

1973 final award of the Indian Claims 

Commission to the Sauk and Fox tribes 

(4 Ind. Cl. Comm. 367 [1957]). The 

Review Committee considered the 

proposal at its September 2004 meeting 

in Washington, DC, and recommended 

repatriation of the human remains and 

associated funerary objects to the three 

tribes. The National Park Service 

intends to convey the three associated 

funerary objects to the Sac and Fox 

Nation of Missouri in Kansas and 

Nebraska; Sac and Fox Nation, 

Oklahoma; and Sac and Fox Tribe of the 

Mississippi in Iowa pursuant to 16 

U.S.C. 18f-2.

A September 21, 2004, letter from the 

Designated Federal Officer to the 

superintendent of Effigy Mounds 

National Monument transmitted the 

Review Committee’s recommendation 

that the park repatriate the human 

remains and associated funerary objects 

to the tribes listed above in Summary 

contingent on the publication of a 

Notice of Inventory Completion in the 

Federal Register. This notice fulfills 

that requirement.

Determinations. Under 25 U.S.C. 

3003, Effigy Mounds National 

Monument officials determined that the 

human remains represent the physical 

remains of 12 individuals of Native 

American ancestry; and National Park 

Service officials determined that the 

human remains and associated funerary 

objects are culturally unidentifiable.

Notification. Effigy Mounds National 

Monument is responsible for sending 

copies of this notice to the consulted 

Indian tribes listed above in 

Consultation.

Dated: December 2, 2004

Sherry Hutt,

Manager, National NAGPRA Program.

[FR Doc. 04–27786 Filed 12–17–04] 

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Inventory Completion: UCLA 

Fowler Museum of Cultural History, 

University of California, Los Angeles, 

Los Angeles, CA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

Notice is here given in accordance 

with provisions of the Native American 

Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the 

completion of an inventory of human 

remains and associated funerary objects 

in the possession of the UCLA Fowler 

Museum of Cultural History, University 

of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 

CA. The human remains and associated 

funerary objects were removed from a 

site in Mono County, CA.

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations 

within this notice are the sole 

responsibility of the museum, 

institution, or Federal agency that has 

control of the Native American human 

remains and associated funerary objects. 

The National Park Service is not 

responsible for the determinations 

within this notice.

A detailed assessment of the human 

remains was made by the UCLA Fowler 

Museum of Cultural History 

professional staff in consultation with 

representatives of the Battle Mountain 

Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western 

Shoshone Indians of Nevada; Big Pine 

Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone 

Indians of the Big Pine Reservation, 

California; Bridgeport Paiute Indian 

Colony of California; Burns Paiute Tribe 

of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of 

Oregon; Cedarville Rancheria, 

California; Confederated Tribes of the 

Goshute Reservation, Nevada and Utah; 

Confederated Tribes of the Warm 

Springs Reservation of Oregon; Death 

Valley Timbi-Sha Shoshone Band of 

California; Duckwater Shoshone Tribe 

of the Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; 

Elko Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of 

Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada; 

Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada; Fort 

Bidwell Indian Community of the Fort 

Bidwell Reservation of California; Fort 

Independence Indian Community of 

Paiute Indians of the Fort Independence 

Reservation, California; Fort McDermitt 

Paiute and Shoshone Tribes of the Fort 

McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada 

and Oregon; Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute 

Indians of the Las Vegas Indian Colony, 

Nevada; Lovelock Paiute Tribe of the 

Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada; Moapa 

Band of Paiute Indians of the Moapa 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 2004 / Notices 76007

River Indian Reservation, Nevada; 

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; 

Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop 

Community of the Bishop Colony, 

California; Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada; 

Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Lone 

Pine Community of the Lone Pine 

Reservation, California; Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe of the Pyramid Lake 

Reservation, Nevada; Reno-Sparks 

Indian Colony, Nevada; 

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort 

Hall Reservation of Idaho; 

Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, Nevada; Shoshone 

Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, 

Wyoming; Skull Valley Band of Goshute 

Indians of Utah; South Fork Band of the 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Summit Lake Paiute 

Tribe of Nevada; Susanville Indian 

Rancheria, California; Utu Utu Gwaitu 

Paiute Tribe of the Benton Paiute 

Reservation, California; Walker River 

Paiute Tribe of the Walker River 

Reservation, Nevada; Washoe Tribe of 

Nevada and California; Wells Band of 

the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Winnemucca Indian 

Colony of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada; and the Mono 

Lake Kutzadika Indian Community (a 

nonfederally recognized Indian group) 

and Coleville Onadika (Salt Eaters) in 

Antelope Valley (a nonfederally 

recognized Indian group).

In 1959, human remains representing 

one individual were removed from a 

burial on the Cain Ranch (site 

CA-MNO–384), Mono County, CA, by 

Emma Lou Davis and were accessioned 

by the University of California, Los 

Angeles the same year. No known 

individual was identified. The 75 

associated funerary objects are 70 shell 

beads, 2 bone awl pieces, 1 haliotis 

pendant, 1 haliotis fragment, and 1 deer 

phalanx fragment.

The Mono Basin site is located within 

the traditional territory of the Northern 

Paiute, Owens Valley Paiute, and 

Western Shoshone tribes. The artifacts 

are consistent with others documented 

as associated with the indigenous 

inhabitants of the area. The burial dates 

to the transition between the Middle 

and Late Archaic periods. According to 

archaeologists, the Mono Basin area has 

been used by indigenous groups for as 

long as 8,000 years. Tribal 

representatives from the Mono Lake 

Kutzadika (a nonfederally recognized 

Indian group) stated that Mono Lake 

families are related to families who are 

now members of the Utu Utu Gwaitu 

Benton Paiute Tribe of the Benton 

Paiute Reservation, California and the 

Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of 

California. Joseph Saulque, Chair of the 

Utu Utu Gwaitu Benton Paiute Tribe, 

said that he and others consider that the 

Owens Valley and Northern Paiute are 

all one related people, and that they are 

all indigenous to the areas in which 

they now reside. Elders of the 

Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of 

California reviewed the archaeological 

report for the burial and said that they 

recognized many elements of a 

traditional Paiute burial and that the 

burial was not too old to be Paiute.

Officials of the UCLA Fowler Museum 

of Cultural History have determined 

that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), 

the human remains described above are 

the physical remains of one individual 

of Native American ancestry. Officials of 

the UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural 

History have also determined that, 

pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(A), the 75 

objects described above are reasonably 

believed to have been placed with or 

near individual human remains at the 

time of death or later as part of the death 

rite or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the 

UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural 

History have determined that, pursuant 

to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a 

relationship of shared group identity 

that can be reasonably traced between 

the Native American human remains 

and associated funerary objects and the 

Battle Mountain Band of the Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada; Big Pine Band of Owens Valley 

Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine 

Reservation, California; Bridgeport 

Paiute Indian Colony of California; 

Burns Paiute Tribe of the Burns Paiute 

Indian Colony of Oregon; Cedarville 

Rancheria, California; Confederated 

Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, 

Nevada and Utah; Confederated Tribes 

of the Warm Springs Reservation of 

Oregon; Death Valley Timbi-Sha 

Shoshone Band of California; Duckwater 

Shoshone Tribe of the Duckwater 

Reservation, Nevada; Elko Band of the 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Ely Shoshone Tribe 

of Nevada; Fort Bidwell Indian 

Community of the Fort Bidwell 

Reservation of California; Fort 

Independence Indian Community of 

Paiute Indians of the Fort Independence 

Reservation, California; Fort McDermitt 

Paiute and Shoshone Tribes of the Fort 

McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada 

and Oregon; Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute 

Indians of the Las Vegas Indian Colony, 

Nevada; Lovelock Paiute Tribe of the 

Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada; Moapa 

Band of Paiute Indians of the Moapa 

River Indian Reservation, Nevada; 

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; 

Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop 

Community of the Bishop Colony, 

California; Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada; 

Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Lone 

Pine Community of the Lone Pine 

Reservation, California; Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe of the Pyramid Lake 

Reservation, Nevada; Reno-Sparks 

Indian Colony, Nevada; 

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort 

Hall Reservation of Idaho; 

Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, Nevada; Shoshone 

Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, 

Wyoming; Skull Valley Band of Goshute 

Indians of Utah; South Fork Band of the 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Summit Lake Paiute 

Tribe of Nevada; Susanville Indian 

Rancheria, California; Utu Utu Gwaitu 

Paiute Tribe of the Benton Paiute 

Reservation, California; Walker River 

Paiute Tribe of the Walker River 

Reservation, Nevada; Washoe Tribe of 

Nevada and California; Wells Band of 

the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Winnemucca Indian 

Colony of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; and Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada, and there is a 

cultural relationship between the Native 

American human remains and 

associated funerary objects and the 

Mono Lake Kutzadika Indian 

Community (a nonfederally recognized 

Indian group) and the Coleville Onadika 

(Salt Eaters) in Antelope Valley (a 

nonfederally recognized Indian group). 

The University of California, Los 

Angeles has received a claim from the 

Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of the 

Benton Paiute Reservation, Califonia for 

the human remains and associated 

funerary objects removed from the Cain 

Ranch site.

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the human remains and 

associated funerary objects should 

contact Diana Wilson, UCLA NAGPRA 

Coordinator, Office of the Vice 

Chancellor, Research, University of 

California, Los Angeles, Box 951405, 

Los Angeles, CA 90095–1405, telephone 

(310) 825–1864, before January 19, 2005. 

Repatriation of the human remains and 

associated funerary objects to the Utu 

Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of the Benton 

Paiute Reservation, California may 

proceed after that date if no additional 

claimants come forward.

UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural 

History is responsible for notifying the 

37 tribes and the 2 nonfederally 

76008 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 2004 / Notices 

recognized Indian groups listed above 

that this notice has been published.

Dated: December 14, 2004.

Sherry Hutt,

Manager, National NAGPRA Program.

[FR Doc. 04–27787 Filed 12–17–04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation 

Central Valley Project Improvement 

Act, Water Management Plans.

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

SUMMARY: The following Water 

Management Plans are available for 

review: 

• Citrus Heights Water District. 

• Del Puerto Water District. 

• Fair Oaks Water District. 

• Orange Vale Water District. 

• Shasta View Irrigation District. 

To meet the requirements of the 

Central Valley Project Improvement Act 

of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation 

Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of 

Reclamation (Reclamation) has 

developed and published the Criteria for 

Evaluating Water Management Plans 

(Criteria). Note: For the purpose of this 

announcement, Water Management 

Plans (Plans) are considered the same as 

Water Conservation Plans. The above 

districts have developed a Plan, which 

Reclamation has evaluated and 

preliminarily determined to meet the 

requirements of these Criteria. 

Reclamation is publishing this notice in 

order to allow the public to review the 

Plans and comment on the preliminary 

determinations. Public comment on 

Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft) 

determination is invited at this time.

DATES: All public comments must be 

received by January 19, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to 

Leslie Barbre, Bureau of Reclamation, 

2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, 

California 95825, or contact at 916–978–

5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail at 

lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

be placed on a mailing list for any 

subsequent information, please contact 

Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address or 

telephone number above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are 

inviting the public to comment on our 

preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of 

Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the 

CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102–575) 

requires the Secretary of the Interior to 

establish and administer an office on 

Central Valley Project water 

conservation best management practices 

that shall ‘‘* * * develop criteria for 

evaluating the adequacy of all water 

conservation plans developed by project 

contractors, including those plans 

required by Section 210 of the 

Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, 

according to Section 3405(e)(1), these 

Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with 

the purpose of promoting the highest 

level of water use efficiency reasonably 

achievable by project contractors using 

best available cost-effective technology 

and best management practices.’’ These 

Criteria state that all parties 

(Contractors) that contract with 

Reclamation for water supplies 

(municipal and industrial contracts over 

2,000 acre-feet and agricultural 

contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) 

must prepare Plans that contain the 

following information: 

1. Description of the District. 

2. Inventory of Water Resources. 

3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) 

for Agricultural Contractors. 

4. BMPs for Urban Contractors. 

5. BMP Plan Implementation. 

6. BMP Exemption Justification. 

Reclamation will evaluate Plans based 

on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans 

will be available for review at 

Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific (MP) 

Regional Office located in Sacramento, 

California, and the local area office. 

Our practice is to make comments, 

including names and home addresses of 

respondents, available for public 

review. Individual respondents may 

request that Reclamation withhold their 

home address from public disclosure, 

and we will honor such request to the 

extent allowable by law. There also may 

be circumstances in which Reclamation 

would elect to withhold a respondent’s 

identity from public disclosure, as 

allowable by law. If you wish us to 

withhold your name and/or address, 

you must state this prominently at the 

beginning of your comments. We will 

make all submissions from 

organizations, businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses available for 

public disclosure in their entirety. If you 

wish to review a copy of these Plans, 

please contact Ms. Barbre to find the 

office nearest you.

Dated: December 2, 2004. 

Tracy Slavin, 

Chief, Program Management Branch, MidPacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.

[FR Doc. 04–27816 Filed 12–17–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1074–1075 

(Final)] 

Certain Circular Welded Carbon 

Quality Line Pipe From Korea and 

Mexico

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject 

investigations. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 14, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Ruggles (202–205–3187 or e-mail at 

fred.ruggles@usitc.gov), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these investigations may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 18, 2004, the Commission 

established a schedule for the conduct 

of the final phase of the subject 

investigations (69 FR 61858, October 21, 

2004). Subsequently, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce terminated its 

final investigation concerning China. 

The Commission, therefore, is revising 

its schedule concerning Korea and 

Mexico to reflect the expected timing of 

Commerce’s final determinations in the 

remaining investigations. 

The Commission’s new schedule for 

the investigations is as follows: requests 

to appear at the hearing must be filed 

with the Secretary to the Commission 

not later than February 14, 2005; the 

prehearing conference will be held at 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on 

February 18; the deadline for filing 

prehearing briefs is February 14; the 

hearing will be held at the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

Building at 9:30 a.m. on February 22; 

the deadline for filing posthearing briefs 

is March 1; the Commission will make 

its final release of information on March 

17; and final party comments are due on 

March 21. 

For further information concerning 

these investigations see the