alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arthur S. Beves v. Mary E. Post.

Motion granted, without costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.                 Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2019-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                 Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                 Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40384 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN ANTONIO TORRES

- VARGAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12

- CR

- 1011

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio
Torres

- Vargas (Torres) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40384 Document: 00512473603 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 40384

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40384 Document: 00512473603 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
### §300ee–19. Prohibition against certain false statements

#### (a) In general

(1) A person may not knowingly make or cause to be made any false statement or representation of a material fact in connection with the furnishing of items or services for which amounts may be paid by a State from payments received by the State under section 300ee–11(a) of this title.

(2) A person with knowledge of the occurrence of any event affecting the right of the person to receive any amounts from payments made to the State under section 300ee–11(a) of this title may not conceal or fail to disclose any such event with the intent of fraudulently securing such amounts.

#### (b) Criminal penalty for violation of prohibition

Any person who violates a prohibition established in subsection (a) may for each violation be fined in accordance with title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXV, formerly title XV, §2509, as added Pub. L. 100–607, title II, §221, Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3101; renumbered title XXV, Pub. L. 101–93, §5(e)(1), Aug. 16, 1989, 103 Stat. 612.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2509 of act July 1, 1944, was successively renumbered by subsequent acts, see section 238h of this title.
| + 4
|
we i ne
zi |
on af! { fe)
a0) aun a = +
‘ | is a
its Fe a 5 =
i al ae a
{Hee de es

= Coy Sis Sa L PE

aa = = we |
—
(Gaal Grazing Allotment ee ee
“Lands Not Allotted Kilometers
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Reclamation a
Department of Defense Miles

(@ Fish and Wildlife

Forest Service
(J Private Map 3-3

State Grazing Allotments
iE Water
§ 1509.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the ADF President determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
(June 28, 1977)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Ramirez, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 24, 1976, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Evans and Markewich, JJ.
### §300dd–33. Funding

For the purpose of grants under section 300dd–31 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1989 and 1990.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXIV, §2433, as added Pub. L. 100–607, title II, §211, Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3091.)
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imperial Petroleum Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Alan B. Springer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By:      /s/ Alan B. Springer                                  July 20, 2006
   --------------------------------------------------
      Alan B. Springer
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                     23
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Dietary supplements**
 
2008 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:D 56/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001101016
 
July 8, 2019
### §2296b–5. Uranium inventory study

Within 1 year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a study and report that includes—

(1) a comprehensive inventory of all Government owned uranium or uranium equivalents, including natural uranium, depleted tailings, low-enriched uranium, and highly enriched uranium available for conversion to commercial use;

(2) a plan for the conversion of inventories of foreign and domestic highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium for commercial use;

(3) an estimation of the potential need of the United States for inventories of highly enriched uranium;

(4) an analysis and summary of technological requirements and costs associated with converting highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium, including the construction of facilities if necessary;

(5) an estimation of potential net proceeds from the conversion and sale of highly enriched uranium;

(6) recommendations for implementing a plan to convert highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium; and

(7) recommendations for the future use and disposition of such inventories.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title X, §1016, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2949.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
### §1922. Establishment of medals for character and service; condition governing awards

The Department of Justice shall also honor by an appropriate medal such American boy or girl citizens, eighteen years old or under, who, in the opinion of the said Department of Justice, shall have achieved outstanding or unusual recognition for character and service during any given year.

(Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 520, §2, 64 Stat. 397.)
#### § 1427.4 Submissions from interested parties.

Prior to issuance of a general statement of policy or guidance the Board, as it deems appropriate, will afford an opportunity to interested parties to express their views orally or in writing.
§ 308.15 Identification of requesters. The agency shall require reasonable identification of all individuals who request access to records to assure that records are not disclosed to persons not entitled to such access. ( a ) In the event an individual requests disclosure in person, such individual shall be required to show an identification card such as a driver's license, etc., containing a photo and a sample signature of such individual. Such individual may also be required to sign a statement under oath as to his or her identity acknowledging that he or she is aware of the penalties for improper disclosure under the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974.
( b ) In the event that disclosure is requested by mail, the agency may request such information as may be necessary to reasonably assure that the individual making such request is properly identified. In certain cases, the agency may require that a mail request be notarized with an indication that the notary received an acknowledgment of identity from the individual making such request.
( c ) In the event an individual is unable to provide suitable documentation or identification, the agency may require a signed notarized statement asserting the identity of the individual and stipulating that the individual understands that knowingly or willfully seeking or obtaining access to records about another person under false pretenses is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.
( d ) In the event a requester wishes to be accompanied by another person while reviewing his or her records, the agency may require a written statement authorizing discussion of his or her records in the presence of the accompanying representative or other persons.
Exhibit 99.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Coca-Cola Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Gary P.
Fayard, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                           /s/ GARY P. FAYARD
                                           ------------------
                                           Gary P. Fayard
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 12, 2002
§ 228.03 Identification of the authorized principal geographic procurement codes. ( a ) USAID has established principal geographic codes which are used by USAID in implementing instruments. This regulation establishes a presumptive authorized principal geographic code, Code 937, for procurement of commodities and services unless otherwise specified in the implementing instrument. Code 937 is defined as the United States, the cooperating/recipient country, and developing countries other than advanced developing countries, and excluding prohibited sources. USAID maintains a list of developing countries, advanced developing countries, and prohibited sources, which will be available in USAID's Automated Directives System, ADS 310.
( b ) For purposes of procurements under the authority of the Development Fund for Africa, 22 U.S.C. 2293 *et seq.;* for any waivers authorized under Subpart D of this regulation; and if otherwise designated in an implementing instrument, the authorized principal geographic code shall be Code 935, any area or country but excluding prohibited sources.
( c ) For purposes of procurements under the Support for Economic and Democratic Development of the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union, 22 U.S.C. 2295b, the authorized principal geographic codes are Code 937 and Code 110 (New Independent States).
( d ) Additional principal geographic codes may be added to this section if authorized by Congress.
### §16523. Alaska natural gas pipeline

Not later than 180 days after August 8, 2005, and every 180 days thereafter until the Alaska natural gas pipeline commences operation, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall submit to Congress a report describing—

(1) the progress made in licensing and constructing the pipeline; and

(2) any issue impeding that progress.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XVIII, §1810, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1126.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert E. Grier, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 480]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered June 18, 1999, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of sodomy in the second degree.

On October 7, 1998, a Grand Jury returned a four-count indictment against defendant charging him with two counts of sodomy in the second degree and two counts of sodomy in the third degree. The charges arise from four incidents, two that occurred during July 1997 and two that occurred in the winter and early spring of 1998, wherein defendant was accused of engaging in sexual acts with his girlfriend’s (hereinafter the victim) grandson. Defendant had given an oral statement to police, later reduced to writing and signed by him, admitting to engaging in sexual conduct with the victim on two occasions during the summer of 1997.

At trial, the victim testified that he went to defendant’s house in the spring of 1998 and that defendant told him to go into the bedroom and wait for him. Defendant directed the victim to take down his pants and bend over, then subjected the victim to sexual contact. The victim further testified that that winter (after his 14th birthday) and twice during the preceding summer, he was similarly abused. After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of sodomy in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 130.45) but acquitted of sodomy in the third degree *(see,*Penal Law § 130.40). This appeal ensued.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that no nonfrivolous issues can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record indicates at least one potential nonfrivolous issue, namely, whether defendant’s conviction was against the weight of the evidence. Accordingly, we will assign new counsel to represent defendant on appeal and grant defense counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment *(see, People v Garnett,*274 AD2d 667).

Crew III, J. P., Spain, Graffeo and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 7/9/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A.

MOBILE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING

SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI;

PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S.

BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN

CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA;

ANIMESH NASKAR,

Defendants.

No. C-08-02658 RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL

[Re Docket No. 146]

Plaintiffs move to file under seal Exhibits S1 to S6 to the Third Amended Complaint. A

request to seal must establish that the document, or portions thereof, is privileged or protectable as a

trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Civ. L. R. 79-5(a). The request must

be narrowly tailored to seek sealing of only sealable material. Id. 

Having reviewed the material that plaintiffs seek to file under seal, the court has concerns

about the extent of material which plaintiffs seek to file under seal. There does not appear to be a

basis for filing the entirety of Exhibit S5 or any portion of Exhibit S6 under seal. The court

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 164 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 2

therefore orders plaintiffs to either explain why all of the designated material is sealable or to submit

a narrowly tailored request to file under seal only those portions of the documents that are sealable

material. If plaintiffs do not submit a satisfactory explanation or an appropriately narrowly tailored

request within ten days, the motion to seal will be denied. 

DATED: 7/9/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 164 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-03865-JSW Document 15 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:08-cv-03865-JSW Document 15 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:08-cv-03865-JSW Document 15 Filed 08/03/10 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Murphy, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 301]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about April 13, 1999, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.0-3 Filing of material with the Commission. ( a ) All papers required to be filed with the Commission pursuant to the Act or the rules and regulations thereunder shall be filed at the principal office in Washington, DC. Material may be filed by delivery to the Commission, through the mails or otherwise. The date on which papers are actually received by the Commission shall be the date of filing thereof if all of the requirements with respect to the filing have been complied with, except that if the last day on which papers can be accepted as timely filed falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, such papers may be filed on the first business day following.
( b ) The manually signed original (or in the case of duplicate originals, one duplicate original) of all registrations, applications, statements, reports, or other documents filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, shall be numbered sequentially (in addition to any internal numbering which otherwise may be present) by handwritten, typed, printed, or other legible form of notation from the facing page of the document through the last page of that document and any exhibits or attachments thereto. Further, the total number of pages contained in a numbered original shall be set forth on the first page of the document.
( c ) Each document filed shall contain an exhibit index, which should immediately precede the exhibits filed with such document. The index shall list each exhibit filed and identify by handwritten, typed, printed, or other legible form of notation in the manually signed original, the page number in the sequential numbering system described in paragraph (b) of this section where such exhibit can be found or where it is stated that the exhibit is incorporated by reference. Further, the first page of the manually signed document shall list the page in the filing where the exhibit index is located.
[44 FR 4666, Jan. 23, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 58828, Sept. 5, 1980]