75594 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2004 / Notices 

application, in whole or in part, no later 

than March 12, 2005. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the application. 

Level of the Proposed PFC: $4.50. 

Actual Impose Only Charge—Effective 

Date: April 1, 2002. 

Proposed Charge—Expiration Date:

December 31, 2007. 

Total Requested for Use Approval:

$215,000. 

Brief Description of Proposed Project:

Land acquisition. 

Class or Classes of Air Carrier That 

the Public Agency Has Requested Not be 

Required To Collect PFC’s: Air taxi 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Any person may inspect the 

application in person at the FAA office 

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA 

Regional Airports Office located at: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Northwest Mountain Region, Airports 

Division, ANM–600, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Suite 315, Renton, WA 98055–

4056. 

In addition, any person may, upon 

request, inspect the application, notice, 

and other documents germane to the 

application in person at the Telluride 

Regional Airport.

Issued in Renton, Washington on 

December 10, 2004. 

David A. Field, 

Manager, Planning, Programming and 

Capacity Branch, Northwest Mountain 

Region.

[FR Doc. 04–27693 Filed 12–16–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge 

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly notice of PFC 

approvals and disapprovals. In October 

2004, there were four applications 

approved. This notice also includes 

information on three applications, 

approved in September 2004, 

inadvertently left off the September 

2004 notice. Additionally, 27 approved 

amendments to previously approved 

applications are listed. 

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly 

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals 

and disapprovals under the provisions 

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and part 158 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

CFR part 158). This notice is published 

pursuant toparagraph d of § 158.29. 

PFC Applications Approved 

Public Agency: Wayne County Airport 

Authority, Romulus, Michigan. 

Application Number: 04–05–C–00–

DTW. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $440,790,156. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date:

September 1, 2029. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

October 1, 2032. 

Class of Air Carriers not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: All air carriers or foreign 

air carriers which enplane fewer than 

500 passengers each per year. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Detroit 

Metropolitan Wayne County Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC 

Level:

North terminal apron. 

McNamara Terminal phase II 

program. 

Third aircraft rescue and firefighting 

facility. 

West airfield improvements. 

Interconnect re-route. 

Taxiway Q construction. 

Runway 4R/22L shoulders/

overburden. 

Deicing pad at runway 22L. 

Deicing pads at runways 4R and 3L. 

Perimeter fencing and other security 

enhancements. 

Surface movement guidance control 

system. 

Runway 3L/21R planning. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use at a $3.00 PFC 

Level: Runway 3R/21L design and 

pavement evaluation. 

Brief Description of Project Partially 

Approved for Collection and Use at a 

$3.00 PFC Level: Part 150 study update. 

Determination: The approved amount 

is less than the amount requested due to 

the issuance of an Airport Improvement 

Program grant for this project after the 

FAA’s receipt of the PFC application. 

Brief Description of Withdrawn 

Project: Airfield safety vehicles and 

equipment. 

Date of Withdrawal: September 20, 

2004. 

Decision Date: September 28, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Jason Watt, Detroit Airports District 

Office, (734) 229–2906.

Public Agency: Broome County 

Department of Aviation, Binghamton, 

New York. 

Application Number: 04–07–C–00–

BGM. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $237,624. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2005. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

February 1, 2006. 

Class C-Air Carriers not required to 

collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Greater 

Binghamton Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use:

Glycol collection system 

rehabilitation. 

Runway 10/28 safety area study. 

Airport wildlife hazard study. 

Taxiway rehabilitation—design. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection: Airport entrance road 

improvements. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Use: Runway 16/34 refurbishment, 

design/construction. 

Decision Date: September 29, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Robert Levine, New York Airports 

District Office, (516) 227–3807.

Public Agency: Chemung County, 

Elmira, New York. 

Application Number: 04–01–C–00–

ELM. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC.

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $791.873

Earliest Charge Effective Date:

December 1, 2004. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

January 1, 2008. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Elmira/

Corning Regional Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use:

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2004 / Notices 75595

Purchase airport sweeper. 

Rehabilitate and mark taxiway A, 

rehabilitate and mark terminal apron. 

Security vulnerability assessment. 

Snow removal equipment building 

expansion. 

Purchase and install passenger 

boarding bridge. 

Hazard beacon (obstruction lights) 

study. 

Rehabilitate and strengthen taxiways 

C, G, and H. 

Construct itinerant aircraft apron. 

Update/upgrade airport security 

access control system. 

Environmental assessment for the 

extension of runway 6 end. 

Install security fence at Schweizer 

property, T-hangar access area and 

maintenance area. 

Airfield storm water drainage study, 

phase 1. 

Acquire multi-purpose snow removal 

equipment. 

Master plan update. 

Acquire aircraft rescue and 

firefighting command/friction survey 

vehicle. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection: Rehabilitate taxiway D; 

Runway end 6 extension, phase 1 

(design). 

Brief Description of Disapproved 

Project: Purchase multi-purpose snow 

removal equipment. 

Determination: Disapproved. This 

project was not included in the airline 

consultation process. 

Decision Date: September 30, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Philip Brito, New York Airports District 

Office, (516) 227–3800.

Public Agency: City of Kansas City, 

Missouri. 

Application Number: 04–04–C–00–

MCI. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $4,066,500. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date:

October 1, 2017. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

December 1, 2017. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled/on 

demand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Kansas 

City International Airport. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use: Reconstruct 

runway 1/19. 

Decision Date: October 8, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Nicoletta S. Oliver, Central Region 

Airports Division, (816) 329–2642.

Public Agency: County of Milwaukee, 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

Application Number: 04–11–U–00–

MKE. 

Application Type: Use PFC revenue. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue To be Used in 

This Decision: $825,000. 

Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2017. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

September 1, 2017. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: No change from previous 

decision. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Use: E concourse aircraft ramp. 

Decision Date: October 8, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Sandra E. DePottey, Minneapolis 

Airports District Office, (612) 713–4363.

Public Agency: Commonwealth Ports 

Authority, Saipan, Northern Mariana 

Islands. 

Applications Number: 04–01–C–00–

GSN; 04–01–C–00–GRO; and 04–01–C–

00–TNI. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved In This 

Decision: $33,442,548 ($29,920,680 at 

Francisco C. Ada/Saipan International 

Airport (GSN); $1,797,042 at Rota 

International Airport (GRO); and 

$1,724,826 at Tinian International 

Airport (TNI)). 

Earliest Charge Effective Date at Each 

Airport: January 1, 2005. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date at 

Each Airport: August 1, 2016. 

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required 

to Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection At GSN, GRO, and TNI 

and Use at GSN:

Electrical upgrade/generator. 

Conversion of restaurant to holdroom. 

Sewer line connection. 

Enclosure and air conditioning of 

corridor. 

Environmental assessment for 

hardstand and taxiways. 

Connecting taxiway. 

Storm drainage master plan. 

Parallel taxiway. 

Aircraft waste disposal. 

Perimeter fencing. 

New aircraft rescue and firefighting 

vehicle.

Environmental assessment for 

taxiways. 

Flight information display. 

Radio communications upgrade. 

Runway 7/25 rehabilitation—phases I 

and II. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

training facility (burn pit). 

Noise mitigation. 

Airport security enhancements. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

training facility (classroom). 

Terminal roof replacement. 

Runway safety area improvements. 

PFC implementation and 

administration. 

Terminal modernization program, 

phase I. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at GSN, GRO, and TNI 

and Use at GRO:

Apron expansion. 

Air conditioning arrival area. 

Runway rehabilitation. 

Airport visual guidance system. 

Environmental assessment for runway 

9/27 extension. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection at GSN, GRO, and TNI for 

Future Use at GRO: Design and 

construct runway 9/27 extension. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection at GSN, GRO, and TNI 

and Use at TNI:

New runway improvement. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

vehicle. 

Decision Date: October 15, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Gordon K. Wong, Honolulu Airports 

District Office, (808) 541–3565.

Public Agency: Tri-State Airport 

Authority, Huntington, West Virginia. 

Application Number: 04–05–C–00–

HTS. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $3.00. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $436,233. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date:

December 1, 2007. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

December 1, 2011. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form 

1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Tri-State 

Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use:

Taxiway A rehabilitation. 

Water system rehabilitation. 

Acquire friction measuring 

equipment. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

building rehabilitation. 

Airfield drainage rehabilitation.

75596 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2004 / Notices 

PFC preparation. 

Main terminal building renovations 

and loading bridge. 

Relocate and replace rotating beacon. 

Acquire snow removal equipment. 

Air carrier apron rehabilitation. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection: General aviation apron 

rehabilitation. 

Decision Date: October 18, 2004. 

For Further Information Contact:

Larry F. Clark, Beckley Airports District 

Office, (304) 252–6216.

Amendments to PFC Approvals

Amendment No.

City, State 

Amendment approved date Original approved 

net PFC revenue 

Amended approved net PFC 

revenue 

Original estimated 

charge exp. date 

Amended estimated charge exp. 

date 

99–02–C–02–MCI; Kansas City, MO .... 07/20/04 $23,844,977 $9,556,186 08/01/09 01/01/06

95–01–C–04–MCI; Kansas City, MO .... 07/22/04 215,381,098 300,111,676 01/01/08 07/01/13

94–01–C–02–SBN; South Bend, IN ...... 09/14/04 8,889,854 8,887,430 12/01/02 09/01/01

02–05–C–01–FLL; Fort Lauderdale, FL 09/22/04 26,533,770 29,460,819 03/01/11 02/01/12

92–01–C–03–GFK; Grand Forks, ND ... 09/29/04 663,847 621,965 08/01/96 09/01/95

96–03–C–01–GFK; Grand Forks, ND ... 09/29/04 86,463 58,141 08/01/96 12/01/95

97–04–C–02–GFK; Grand Forks, ND ... 09/29/04 551,993 522,970 09/01/98 11/01/98

02–06–C–01–DLH; Duluth, MN ............. 10/07/04 901,280 721,079 07/01/05 11/01/04

96–02–C–01–MOT; Minot, ND .............. 10/19/04 287,477 186,282 08/01/00 03/01/98

98–03–C–02–MOT; Minot, ND .............. 10/19/04 227,141 231,153 02/01/04 12/01/99

99–04–C–02–MOT; Minot, ND .............. 10/19/04 757,551 759,503 02/01/04 04/01/03

*97–11–C–02–CHO; Charlottesville, VA 10/19/04 205,900 205,900 12/01/04 02/01/07

*99–12–C–02–CHO; Charlottesville, VA 10/19/04 181,069 181,069 10/01/04 02/01/07

99–13–U–02–CHO; Charlottesville, VA 10/19/04 NA NA 10/01/04 02/01/07

*01–14–C–02–CHO; Charlottesville, VA 10/19/04 348,874 348,874 07/01/06 02/01/07

*3–15–C–01–CHO; Charlottesville, VA 10/19/04 850,000 850,000 01/01/08 02/01/07

94–01–C–03–RIC; Richmond, VA ......... 10/22/04 17,153,645 11,846,867 06/01/01 05/01/98

97–02–C–01–RIC; Richmond, VA ......... 10/22/04 3,978,514 4,325,673 08/01/01 07/01/99

99–03–C–02–RIC; Richmond, VA ......... 10/22/04 106,296,040 111,407,401 07/01/15 07/01/15

03–05–C–01–RIC; Richmond, VA ......... 10/22/04 6,032,887 6,032,887 05/01/25 05/01/25

*99–03–C–03–RIC; Richmond, VA ........ 10/22/04 111,407,401 111,407,401 07/01/15 10/01/19

*01–04–C–03–RIC; Richmond, VA ........ 10/22/04 3,900,333 3,900,333 09/01/16 10/01/19

*03–05–C–02–RIC; Richmond, VA ........ 10/22/04 6,032,887 6,032,333 05/01/25 10/01/19

00–03–C–01–AVP; Wilkes-Barre, PA .... 10/25/04 9,918,271 8,004,756 11/01/10 04/01/11

98–06–C–05–PHL; Philadelphia,PA ...... 10/25/04 23,060,410 23,560,410 03/01/08 03/01/08

01–09–C–01–PHL; Philadelphia, PA ..... 10/25/04 22,250,000 24,400,000 03/01/08 03/01/08

01–04–C–02–RIC; Richmond, VA ......... 10/29/04 3,900,333 3,401,433 10/01/19 11/01/16

Note: The amendments denoted by an 

asterisk (*) include a change to the PFC level 

charged from $3.00 per enplaned passenger 

to $4.50 per enplaned passenger. For 

Charlottesville, VA and Richmond, VA, this 

change is effective on January 1, 2005.

Issued in Washington, DC on December 13, 

2004. 

Joseph G. Washington, 

Acting Manager, Financial Analysis and 

Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 04–27689 Filed 12–16–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration 

Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping 

Requirements; Agency Information 

Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Maritime Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 seq.), this notice announces 

that the Information Collection 

abstracted below has been forwarded to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval. The 

nature of the information collection is 

described as well as its expected 

burden. The Federal Register Notice 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments on the following collection of 

information was published on 

September 29, 2004. No comments were 

received.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before January 18, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frances Jerry, Maritime Administration, 

400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 

20590. Telephone: 202–366–5861; FAX: 

202–366–5980; or e-mail: 

frances.jerry@marad.dot.gov. Copies of 

this collection also can be obtained from 

that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Maritime 

Administration (MARAD). 

Title: Uniform Financial Reporting 

Requirements. 

OMB Control Number: 2133–0005. 

Type of Request: Extension of 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Vessel owners 

acquiring ships from MARAD on credit, 

companies chartering ships from 

MARAD, and companies having Title XI 

guarantee obligations. 

Forms: MA–172. 

Abstract: The Uniform Financial 

Reporting Requirements are used as a 

basis for preparing and filing semiannual and annual financial statements 

with the Maritime Administration 

(MARAD). Regulations requiring 

financial reports to MARAD are 

authorized by Section 801, Merchant 

Marine Act, 1936, as amended. 

Annual Estimated Burden Hours:

1862 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503, Attention 

MARAD Desk Officer. 

Comments are invited on: Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed information collection; ways 

to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology.