alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 10.4.2  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
    


        THIS AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made effective as of January 25, 2006 by and between Liquidity Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and the undersigned ("Executive"). 


 
 

Recitals:  



        A.
Executive and the Company entered into an executive employment agreement dated as of September 2, 2004 (the "Executive Employment Agreement"); and 


        B.
Executive and the Company wish to amend the terms of the Executive Employment Agreement in this Agreement. 


 
 

Agreement:  



        NOW,
THEREFORE, to induce Executive to continue such Executive's employment with the Company, and in consideration of the agreements contained herein and of such other good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which Executive acknowledges, the Company and Executive, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that the Executive Employment Agreement is hereby amended in the
following respect: 


        The
following section, entitled "8.6 Code Section 409A Matters," is hereby added to the Executive Employment Agreement: 


        "Anything
in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if (A) on the date of Executive's "separation from service" (within the meaning of
Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code")) with the Company, Executive is a "specified employee" (within the meaning of
Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code) and (B) as a result of such separation from service, Executive would receive any payment under this Agreement that, absent the application of
this Section 8.6, would be subject to the additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A(a) of the Code as a result of the application of Section 409A(2)(B)(i) of the
Code, then no such payment shall be payable prior to the date that is the earliest of (1) six months after the Executive's separation from service, (2) the Executive's death or
(3) such other date as will cause such payment not to be subject to such additional tax. Any payments which are required to be delayed as a result of this Section 8.6 shall be
accumulated and paid as a lump-sum on the earliest possible date determined in accordance the preceding sentence." 


 
 

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


1







 



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first written above. 



	

 	
 	
LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  WILLIAM P. ANGRICK, III      
 William P. Angrick, III

Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





	
Agreed and Accepted:	
 	

 
	

By:  /s/  JAIME MATEUS-TIQUE      
	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

 
	

NAME:  Jaime Mateus-Tique
	
 	

 





	
 	
 	

 
	Address:	 	458 W. 22 St., Apt 1

New York, NY 10011




2











QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Recitals

Agreement

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Amended Form 8-A replaces former Form 8-C; see § 249.208a of this chapter.

#### § 249.218 Form 18, for foreign governments and political subdivisions thereof.

This form shall be used for the registration of securities of any foreign government or political subdivision thereof.

[47 FR 54781, Dec. 6, 1982]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 18, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2424 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2424

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

 Mr. Gerlach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 11-Aminoundecanoic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 11-AMINOUNDECANOIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.49 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 11-Aminoundecanoic acid) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1508.865 How long may my debarment last? ( a ) If the debarring official decides to debar you, your period of debarment will be based on the seriousness of the cause(s) upon which your debarment is based. Generally, debarment should not exceed three years. However, if circumstances warrant, the debarring official may impose a longer period of debarment.
( b ) In determining the period of debarment, the debarring official may consider the factors in § 1508.860. If a suspension has preceded your debarment, the debarring official must consider the time you were suspended.
( c ) If the debarment is for a violation of the provisions of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, your period of debarment may not exceed five years.
(July 15, 1977)

#### Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 East Williston, Town of North Hempstead, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 East Williston, Town of North Hempstead, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Renewed motion by respondent New York State Division of Human Rights to adjudge the petitioner in contempt for willful and wrongful failure and refusal to comply with and obey the order of this court dated June 25, 1973, in accordance with our order dated February 1, 1977. Motion granted. The board of education is in contempt of this court’s orders dated June 25, 1973 and February 1, 1977 and commencing August 15, 1977 it is fined $50 a day for each and every day that it continues to be in noncompliance. The board of education may purge itself of the contempt by paying the five named teachers the amounts found to be due on or before August 14, 1977. We find that the board’s objections to the nature of the information furnished by the teachers to enable the board to process their claims and the timeliness of said claims to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LUKE D. BRUGNARA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 14-00306 WHA

No. CR 08-00222 WHA

NOTICE RE VOICEMAILS

Defendant Luke Brugnara and his wife should make all motions through his attorney and

stop leaving voicemails with the undersigned judge’s courtroom clerk. These voicemails have

been and will be turned over to the Marshal and the government as potential evidence.

Dated: February 17, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00222-WHA Document 472 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 1
132 STAT. 5120 PUBLIC LAW 115–382—DEC. 21, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6831: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–382 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 35 West 

Main Street in Frisco, Colorado, as the ‘‘Patrick E. Mahany, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PATRICK E. MAHANY, JR., POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 35 West Main Street in Frisco, Colorado, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Patrick E. Mahany, Jr., Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Patrick E. Mahany, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 6831]
§ 19.6-10 Liability. ( a ) The Department shall not be liable for any payment made from retirement benefits pursuant to a court order if such payment is made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
( b ) In the event that the Secretary is served with more than one court order with respect to the same retirement benefits, the benefits shall be available to satisfy the court orders on a first-come, first-served basis.
( c ) A previous spouse or other beneficiary may request that an amount be withheld from the retirement benefits of a principal or survivor of a principal which is less than the amount stipulated in a court order, or otherwise scheduled to be paid to the beneficiary under this chapter. This lower amount will be deemed a complete fulfillment of the obligation of the Department for the period in which the request is in effect. See § 19.14.
*

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1589

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Rufus Todd Jones, also known as *

Todd Jones, also known as Scott Lee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 19, 2003

Filed: February 25, 2003

___________

Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rufus Todd Jones pleaded guilty to trafficking in counterfeit Rolex watches.

Jones did not object to the sentence imposed by the district court,*

 namely, a sentence

of 36 months imprisonment, three years supervised release, and restitution. On

appeal, Jones contends the district court improperly ordered restitution in the amount
-2-

of $116,779.50 for legal fees and expenses Rolex incurred while obtaining a civil

judgment against him.

In our view, the district court correctly ordered restitution for attorney fees.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1)(A) (authorizing restitution); United States v. Jackson, 155

F.3d 942, 949 (8th Cir.) (Standard of review), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1059 (1998).

The record amply supports the district court's determination that the attorney fees

were triggered by the specific conduct that was the basis for the offense of conviction.

Indeed, Jones testified Rolex had brought multiple actions against him relating to his

sales of watches, and an unobjected-to portion of the presentence report (PSR)

asserted Rolex had accrued $116,779.50 in legal fees and expenses in pursuing him.

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(6)(D) (district court may accept unobjected-to portions of

PSR); United States v. Akbani, 151 F.3d 774, 779-80 (8th Cir. 1998). The district

court properly considered Jones's financial resources and ability to meet the

restitution obligation inasmuch as it recognized his negative net worth, stated its

desire that he be able to have at least a little money while incarcerated, and ordered

him to pay only a fraction of his earnings while in prison and $50 per month

following his release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1)(B)(i)(II) (court shall consider

financial resources of defendant); United States v. Manzer, 69 F.3d 222, 229 (8th Cir.

1995). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                   |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                   |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
#### In the Matter of Young Ja Suh, Respondent, v New York State Department of Mental Hygiene et al., Appellants.

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding seeking reinstatement to her former position as a pharmacist at a State mental hospital. Respondent now appeals from an order directing that petitioner be accorded a departmental hearing to review the propriety of her discharge. Such an order is both intermediate and nonfinal and may not be appealed as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1; *Cirasole v Simins,*48 AD2d 795; *Coor Dev. Corp. v Wever,*41 AD2d 689). Since the record does not disclose that permission to appeal was either sought or granted and since the time to seek such leave has expired (see CPLR 5513), the appeal must be dismissed *(Cirasole v Simins, supra; Coor Dev. Corp. v Weber, supra).*In any event, had respondent moved this court for leave to appeal, under the circumstances of this case, we would have denied the application. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—article 78.) Present—Moule, J. P., Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
§ 228.16 Miscellaneous service transactions. This section governs certain miscellaneous services. ( a ) *Commissions.* The nationality rules of this part do not apply to the payment of commissions by suppliers.
( b ) *Bonds and guarantees.* The nationality rules of this part do not apply to sureties, insurance companies or banks who issue bonds or guarantees under USAID-financed contracts.
( c ) *Liability insurance under construction contracts.* The nationality rules of this part do not apply to firms providing liability insurance under construction contracts.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER RE THE TRIAL DATE

With respect to the trial date, it will be left at May 10, 2010, but it may have to trail

another large earlier trial that will likely still be underway when May 10 arrives. The actual start

date for the Schwab trial may (or may not) slip to the week of May 17. Not having the luxury to

move the start date to the following week, the Court must ask counsel and witnesses to be flexible

and adjust, being ready to go as scheduled, as well as trailing as necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02487-WHA Document 35 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 33.6 Fees. ( a ) *General.* Fees provide for administrative costs and payment of claims. Fees are set annually on the basis of past and anticipated claim experience. The annual agreement year for which fees are payable starts on October 1 and ends on September 30 of the following year.
( b ) *Amount and payment.* The amount of each annual fee or adjusted fee will be established by the Office Director of the Office of Marine Conservation, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, by publication of a notice in the Federal Register. Each notice will establish the amount of the fee, when the fee is due, when the fee is payable, and any special conditions surrounding extension of prior agreements or execution of new agreements. Unless otherwise specified in such notices, agreement coverage will commence with the postmarked date of the fee payment and application.
( c ) *Adjustment and refund.* Fees may be adjusted at any time to reflect actual seizure and detention experience for which claims are anticipated. Failure to submit adjusted fees will result in agreement termination as of the date the adjusted fee is payable. No fees will be refunded after an agreement is executed by the Secretary.
( d ) *Disposition.* All fees will be deposited in the Fishermen's Guaranty Fund. They will remain available without fiscal year limitation to carry out section 7 of the Act. Claims will be paid from fees and from appropriated funds, if any. Fees not required to pay administrative costs or claims may be invested in U.S. obligations. All earnings will be credited to the Fishermen's Guaranty Fund.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN NEBLETT,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT L. AYERS, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-3545 SI (PR)

JUDGMENT

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of

Respondent. 

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

DATED: March 15, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03545-SI Document 8 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1003.6 Administrative review. ( a ) Upon denial of a request, the responsible Inter-American Foundation official or designated employee will inform the requester in writing of the denial, cite the reason or reasons and the Inter-American Foundation regulations upon which the denial is based, and advise that the denial may be appealed to the Administrator.
( b ) The final agency decision in such appeals will be made by the Administrator or Deputy Administrator.
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.25 Bid and performance bonds and guaranties.

Whenever the importer requires the posting of a bid bond or guaranty or performance bond or guaranty, the type of bond or guaranty (certified check, irrevocable letter of credit, bank bond, bank guaranty, or surety bond) shall be at the option of the bidder or supplier. Posted bid bonds or guaranties shall be returned to unsuccessful bidders promptly after an award is made. Unless converted to a required performance bond or guaranty, any bid bond or guaranty posted by the successful bidder shall also be returned promptly. Performance bonds or guaranties (as distinguished from commodity warranties of quality or performance) shall be canceled no later than 30 days after completion of the contract performance guarantied.
#### § 18.1 Scope.

This part contains rules governing disciplinary action against a former officer or employee of the Department of State, including the Foreign Service, because of a violation of the post employment conflict of interest prohibitions. Such disciplinary action may include prohibition from practice before the Department of State and any component thereof as defined in this part.
### §300b. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2193(b)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 827

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XI, §1101, as added Apr. 22, 1976, Pub. L. 94–278, title IV, §403(a), 90 Stat. 407; amended Nov. 10, 1978, Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §205(b), (d)(2), (e), 92 Stat. 3583, 3584; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2193(a)(1)(B), 95 Stat. 826; Jan. 4, 1983, Pub. L. 97–414, §8(o), 96 Stat. 2061, related to testing, counseling, information and education programs.

A prior section 300b, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XI, §1101, as added May 16, 1972, Pub. L. 92–294, §3(c), 86 Stat. 137; amended Aug. 29, 1972, Pub. L. 92–414, §4(2), 86 Stat. 652, authorized Secretary to make grants and enter contracts with public and nonprofit private entities with respect to establishment of voluntary sickle cell anemia screening and counseling programs and to develop and disseminate informational and educational materials relating to sickle cell anemia, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–278, title IV, §403(a), Apr. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 407.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment and Repeal, Savings, and Transitional Provisions

For effective date, savings, and transitional provisions relating to the amendment and repeal of this section by Pub. L. 97–35, see section 2194 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 701 of this title.