alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                                     5

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                8,636,513
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         2,230,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     12,412,426
<PP&E>                                                               89,721,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        7,574,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      125,770,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 8,223,758
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 168
<COMMON>                                                                118,833
<OTHER-SE>                                                           46,907,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        125,770,541
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     24,326,006
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         9,251,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    3,075,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       1,458,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            916,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     504,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           34,829
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            539,068
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.01)


</TABLE>
Draft EIS Appendix 3 

APPENDIX 3—WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

DESIGNATION PROCESS 

As part of the planning effort for developing the Rawlins Resource Management Plan (RMP), the Bureau 

of Land Management (BLM) planning team members initiated a Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR) review 

of all BLM-administered public land surfaces (public lands) along waterways within the Rawlins RMP

planning area. This review was to determine whether any of these public lands would meet the WSR 

eligibility criteria and suitability factors, as identified in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, as 

amended. 

The BLM WSR review includes a three-step process:

• 

• 

• 

Determining whether public lands along waterways meet the WSR eligibility criteria to be 

tentatively classified as wild, scenic, or recreational 

Determining whether any of those public lands that meet the eligibility criteria also meet the 

WSR suitability factors 

Determining how public lands that are determined suitable for designation will be managed. 

The initial WSR review was conducted separately from the RMP planning process to expedite the review 

process, resulting in a stand-alone WSR review report that will support the land use plan update efforts 

currently underway in the Rawlins Field Office. Any comments made by the public concerning the 

determinations made in this review will be taken into consideration and documented in the RMP planning 

process. This WSR eligibility review may be modified if deemed necessary as a result of public 

comments. The final report and interim management prescriptions will be included in the revision of the

RMP. 

The Rawlins Wild and Scenic Rivers Review Report may be viewed at www.rawlinsrmp.com under 

“documents and bulletins.” 

Rawlins RMP A3-1
§ 16.11 Grievance Board consideration of grievances. ( a ) *Filing of grievance.* A grievant whose grievance is not resolved satisfactorily under agency procedures (§ 16.7) shall be entitled to file a grievance with the Grievance Board no later than 60 days after receiving the agency decision. In the event that an agency has not provided its decision within 90 days of presentation, the grievant shall be entitled to file a grievance with the Grievance Board no later than 150 days after the date of presentation to the agency. The Board may extend or waive, for good cause, the time limits stated in this section.
( b ) *Exhaustion of agency procedures.* In the event that the Grievance Board finds that a grievance has not been presented for agency consideration or that a grievance has been expanded or modified to include materially different elements, the Board shall return the grievance to the official responsible for final agency review unless the agency waives any objection to Board consideration of the grievance without such review.
( c ) *Prescription of interim relief.* If the Grievance Board determines that the agency is considering any action of the character of separation or termination of the grievant, disciplinary action against the grievant, or recovery from the grievant of alleged overpayment of salary, expenses, or allowances, which is related to a grievance pending before the Board, and that such action should be suspended, the agency shall suspend such action until the Board has ruled upon the grievance. *Notwithstanding* such suspension of action, the head of the agency concerned or a chief of mission or principal officer may exclude an officer or employee from official premises or from the performance of specified duties when such exclusion is determined in writing to be essential to the functioning of the post or office to which the officer or employee is assigned.
( d ) *Inquiry into grievances.* The Board shall conduct a hearing at the request of a grievant in any case which involves disciplinary action, or a grievant's retirement from the Service under sections 633 and 634 of the Act, or which in the judgment of the Board can best be resolved by a hearing or by presentation of oral argument. In those grievances in which the Board holds no hearing, the Board shall offer to each party the opportunity to review and to supplement, by written submission, the record of proceedings prior to its decision.
Case 3:08-cv-03742-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-03742-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Capital  Beverage  Corporation  (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carol
Russell,  Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Carol Russell

Carol Russell
Treasurer
May 20, 2003
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

#### § 40.33 Foreign policy. [Reserved]
§ 9.12 Effective date of disciplinary or access denial action. ( a ) *Effective date.* Any disciplinary or access denial action taken by an exchange will not become effective until at least fifteen days after the written notice prescribed by § 9.11 is delivered to the person disciplined or denied access; *Provided, however,* That the exchange may cause a disciplinary action to become effective prior to that time if: ( 1 ) As permitted by part 37, appendix B, Core Principle 2, paragraph (a)(14) of this chapter or part 38, appendix B, Core Principle 13, paragraph (a)(7) of this chapter (emergency disciplinary actions), the exchange reasonably believes, and so states in its written decision, that immediate action is necessary to protect the best interests of the marketplace; or
( 2 ) As permitted by part 37, appendix B, Core Principle 2, paragraph (a)(10)(vi) of this chapter or part 38, appendix B, Core Principle 13, paragraph (a)(4) of this chapter (hearings), the exchange determines, and so states in its written decision, that the actions of a person who is within the exchange's jurisdiction has impeded the progress of a disciplinary hearing; or
( 3 ) As permitted by part 37, appendix B, Core Principle 2, paragraph (a)(13) of this chapter (summary fines for violations of rules regarding timely submission of records) or part 38, appendix B, Core Principle 13, paragraph (a)(6) of this chapter (summary fines for violations of rules regarding timely submission of records, decorum, or other similar activities), the exchange determines that a person has violated exchange rules relating to decorum or attire, or timely submission of accurate records required for clearing or verifying each day's transactions or other similar activities; or
( 4 ) The person against whom the action is taken has consented to the penalty to be imposed and to the timing of its effectiveness.
( b ) *Notice of early effective date.* If the exchange determines in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section that a disciplinary action will become effective prior to the expiration of fifteen days after written notice thereof, it must notify the person disciplined in writing, either personally or by email to the person's last known email address, stating the reasons for the determination. The exchange must also immediately notify the Commission by email to *secretary@cftc.gov .* Where notice is delivered by email, the time within which the person so notified may file a petition for stay pursuant to § 9.24(a)(2) will be increased by one day.
[83 FR 1547, Jan. 12, 2018]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2431 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2431

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,10-Diaminodecane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

 Mr. Mollohan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,10-Diaminodecane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,10-DIAMINODECANE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.31       1,10-              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Diaminodecane                                                      31/2009
                         (CAS No. 646-25-
                         3) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2921.29.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jason Lewis, Appellant, v Jemanda New York Corp., Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 58]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1999, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was allegedly injured on defendant’s premises when a fellow patron hit him over the head with a champagne bottle. Inasmuch as the incident was attributable to the sudden, unexpected and unforeseeable act of plaintiffs assailant, its prevention was beyond any duty defendant may have had as a landowner to its patrons *(see, Davis v City of New York,*183 AD2d 683; *Lindskog v Southland Rest.,*160 AD2d 842). We note in this connection that plaintiff himself testified that he was totally taken by surprise by the assault and that it occurred so quickly that he did not even think to summon defendant’s security guards.

Although plaintiff argues that defendant was negligent for “putting liter size [champagne] bottles in the hands of patrons,” defendant correctly points out that it was not the presence of the champagne bottle, but rather the altercation between plaintiff and the unnamed group of patrons at the club, that was the proximate cause of plaintiffs alleged injuries.

We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
### §238b. Disposition of money collected for care of patients

Money collected as provided by law for expenses incurred in the care and treatment of foreign seamen, and money received for the care and treatment of pay patients, including any amounts received from any executive department on account of care and treatment of pay patients, shall be covered into the appropriation from which the expenses of such care and treatment were paid.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §233, formerly title V, §503, 58 Stat. 710, renumbered title XXI, §2103, Pub. L. 98–24, §2(a)(1), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 176; renumbered title XXIII, §2303, Pub. L. 99–660, title III, §311(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3755; renumbered title XXV, §2503, Pub. L. 100–607, title II, §201(1), (2), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3062; renumbered title XXVI, §2603, Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2620(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4244; renumbered title XXVII, §2703, Pub. L. 101–381, title I, §101(1), (2), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 576; renumbered title II, §233, Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2010(a)(1)–(3), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 213.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 300aaa–2 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–43, to section 300cc–2 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 100–607, to section 300aa–2 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 99–660, and to section 221 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 98–24.
### §297c. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §123(3), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3562

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §837, formerly §824, as added Pub. L. 88–581, §2, Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 915; amended Pub. L. 89–751, §6(b), Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1235; Pub. L. 90–490, title II, §222(d), Aug. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 784; Pub. L. 92–52, §3(a), July 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 144; Pub. L. 92–158, §6(c), Nov. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 477; Pub. L. 93–385, §3(a), Aug. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 741; renumbered §837 and amended Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §§936(c), 941(i)(1), (3), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 363, 365, 366; Pub. L. 96–76, title I, §109(b), Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 580; Pub. L. 97–35, title XXVII, §2757(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 931, authorized appropriations for student loan funds for certain fiscal years.
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2019, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-D Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2022 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To
        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ Scott Cooke
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2452 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Desmodur. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Desmodur. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR RF-E. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.94 Mixtures of tris(4- 

isocyanatophenyl)thiophosphate, ethyl acetate, and monochlorobenzene 

(CAS No. 4151–51–3) (as 

provided for in subheading 

3824.90.28) ......................... 6.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2452 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §13727a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13727a was editorially reclassified as a note under section 4001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Case 3:08-cv-00183-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-00183-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2
05/04/201 0 07;2G FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 0 001/002 

PAU L R. NALVEN -

ALCXE I SCHACH T 

*MCMBl^li o r NfcW YOAK 

AND New JUKBfcT t9AMd 

or 

NALVEN & SCHACH T 

vORl/M 

3SO FIFTH AVENUE. SUlTe .4022 

NEW YoftK, NEW YOR K IOI I S 

TELEPHONE: (21 Z) 616 • 5540 

FACaWfUgi (21 2) 61 6 - 5543 

NEW JepsET OFPIC E 

7 0 SOUTH OftANGE AVENUe, SUITE IAS 

LIVINGSTON , NE W JERSEY 0703 9 

TELEPHONE : (973)655-100 0 

FACSIMILE; (973) 99Z-0431 

April 13,2010 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL-RRR 

Hearing Docket 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wrighit Building, Suite 2W2014 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

CP10 5 u^ooosl 'Z^lo-c>3l(a 

Re: FAA Case Number 2008SW21-198 

In the Matter of Maria Taveras 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Thiis law firm represents Maria Taveras in the above-referenced case and I 

ask that, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.209, this letter be treated as Ms. Taveros' 

answer to the Complaint against her, dated April 7, 2010. 

We admit that the factual allegations in paragraph 1 of the Complaint 

are true. 

We deny that the factual allegations in paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 

12, 15, and 16 of the Complaint are true. 

We lack sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the factual allegations in 

paragraphs 2, 8, 13, and 14 of the Complaint. 

Because we deny that Ms. Taveras assaulted, threatened, intimidated or 

interfered with the unnamed flight attendant mentioned in the Complaint we 

ask that the Complaint against her be dismissed. 

However, should a hearing be held in the matter then we ask that it be 

held in the New York City area since Ms. Taveras lives in the Bronx, New York and 

1 
05/04/201 0 07:2 G FAX 202493514 2 FAA -> DMS 12002/002 

NALVEN a SCHACHT 

is of limited financial means. Indeed, my law firm is handling this matter on a pro 

bono basis. 

Thank you for your attention to these requests. Please direct all 

correspondence in the matter to me. 

Very truly yours. 

cc: VIA CERTIFIED MAIL - RRR 

Yolanda Ayala Bernal 

Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of regional Counsel 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

VIA U.S. MAIL 

Maria Taveras 

Alexei Schacht
### §§3301 to 3313. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted pursuant to section 5316 of this title, which terminated authority to make grants or loans under this subchapter after Jan. 1, 1975.

Section 3301, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §101, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1255, set out Congressional findings and declaration of purpose for this subchapter.

Section 3302, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §102, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1255, set out basic authority of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under this subchapter.

Section 3303, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §103, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1256; Pub. L. 93–503, title I, §105, Nov. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1572, related to demonstration programs.

Section 3304, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §104, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1257, related to financial assistance for planning and developing programs under this subchapter.

Section 3305, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §105, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1257, related to financial assistance for approved programs under this subchapter.

Section 3306, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §106, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1258, related to technical assistance under this subchapter.

Section 3307, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §107, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1259; Pub. L. 91–646, title II, §220(a)(9), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1903, related to relocation requirements and payments.

Section 3308, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §108, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1259, related to continued availability of Federal grant-in-aid program funds.

Section 3309, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §109, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1259, related to consultations by the Secretary with other Federal departments and agencies administering Federal grant-in-aid programs.

Section 3310, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §110, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1259, related to labor standards.

Section 3311, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §111, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1260; Pub. L. 90–448, title XVII, §1701, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 602; Pub. L. 91–152, title III, §301, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 391; Pub. L. 91–609, title III, §301, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1780; Pub. L. 92–335, §2, July 1, 1972, 86 Stat. 405; Pub. L. 93–117, §6, Oct. 2, 1973, 87 Stat. 422; Pub. L. 93–383, title I, §116(d), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 652, authorized appropriations.

Section 3312, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §112, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1260, provided definitions of "Federal grant-in-aid program", "city demonstration agency", "city", and "local agencies".

Section 3313, Pub. L. 89–754, title I, §114, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1261, provided for limitations on amount of grants.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

BRANDON DONALD TAYLOR,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 243 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A196