alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “Z535”  (“Z535 Committee”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “Z535”, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of Z535 Committee's standards development activities are: To develop and maintain American National Standards related to safety signs and colors. Z535 Committee currently maintains six standards relating to the format of safety signs, labels and tags and the symbols and colors used on those signs. The standards developed by Z535 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27542  Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §300ee–13. Requirement of submission of application containing certain agreements and assurances

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may not make payments under section 300ee–11(a) of this title for a fiscal year unless—

(1) the State involved submits to the Secretary a description of the purposes for which the State intends to expend the payments for the fiscal year;

(2) the description identifies the populations, areas, and localities in the State with a need for the services for which amounts may be provided by the State under this part;

(3) the description provides information relating to the programs and activities to be supported and services to be provided, including a description of the manner in which such programs and activities will be coordinated with any similar programs and activities of public and private entities;

(4) the State submits to the Secretary an application for the payments containing agreements in accordance with this part;

(5) the agreements are made through certification from the chief executive officer of the State;

(6) with respect to such agreements, the application provides assurances of compliance satisfactory to the Secretary; and

(7) the application otherwise is in such form, is made in such manner, and contains such agreements, assurances, and information as the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out this part.

#### (b) Opportunity for public comment

The Secretary may not make payments under section 300ee–11(a) of this title for a fiscal year unless the State involved agrees that, in developing and carrying out the description required in subsection (a), the State will provide public notice with respect to the description (including any revisions) and will facilitate comments from interested persons.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXV, formerly title XV, §2503, as added Pub. L. 100–607, title II, §221, Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3095; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2619(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4242; renumbered title XXV, Pub. L. 101–93, §5(e)(1), Aug. 16, 1989, 103 Stat. 612.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2503 of act July 1, 1944, was successively renumbered by subsequent acts, see section 238b of this title.

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 100–690 struck out "and" after semicolon.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–690 effective immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–607, which was approved Nov. 4, 1988, see section 2600 of Pub. L. 100–690, set out as a note under section 242m of this title.
#### Fantu A. KERKERO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1859.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 18, 2007.

Decided: May 1, 2007.

Solomon Bekele, Law Offices of Solomon & Associates, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fantu A. Kerkero, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Kerkero fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to establish eligibility for asylum, Kerkero cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999); *INS v. Cardozar-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). Finally, our review discloses that Kerkero did not show eligibility for CAT relief because she did not demonstrate that it is more likely than not that she will be tortured if removed to Ethiopia. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water levels and artesianpressure in observation wells in the United States. Part 3, North-centralstates.**
 
1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949
1950 | 1951 | 1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104679
 
August 22, 2019
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB-A for the six month period ending June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2007 (the “Report”),
      I, Michael Marcovsky, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/ Michael MarcovskyMichael
              MarcovskyInterim
                Chief Financial Officer
              August
                27, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### § 238.10 Payment to USAID of excess amounts received by a Noteholder.

If a Noteholder shall, as a result of USAID paying compensation under the Guarantee, receive an excess payment, it shall refund the excess to USAID.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

1

ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. CARROLL (ST. BAR #50246)

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 392-5431

Facsimile: (415) 392-1978

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

NICK C. GEANNOCOPULOS (ST. BAR #114822)

LAURA J. MAECHTLEN (ST. BAR #224923) 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

LANER, MUCHIN, DONBROW, BECKER,LEVIN AND TOMINBERG, LTD.

ROBERT H. BROWN, Esq. 

WILLIAM T. DANIELS, Esq.

515 North State Street, Suite 2800

Chicago, Illinois 60610

Telephone: (312) 467-9800

Facsimile: (312) 467-9479

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

BFI WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH AMERICA

INC., a corporation, doing business

as WASTE SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA

COUNTY, BFI SAN CARLOS TRANSFER

STATION, BFI WASTE SERVICES OF SANTA

CLARA COUNTY, BUILDERS DEBRIS BOX,

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF SAN MATEO, AND

BFI SAN CARLOS TRANSFER STATION

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C 08 3331 MHP

STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL 

Case 3:08-cv-03331-MHP Document 54 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

2

The parties having entered into a Settlement Agreement and

Release, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that this action be dismissed with

prejudice.

DATED: April 13,2010 ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By:/s/Michael J. Carroll

Michael J. Carroll

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Northwest Administrators, Inc.

DATED: April 13,2010 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By:/s/Laura J. Maechtlen

Laura J. Maechtlen

Attorneys for Defendant

 BFI Waste Systems, LLC, 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 

JUDGE MARILYN H. PATEL

4/14/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-03331-MHP Document 54 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER REGARDING 

CLASS NOTICE

With respect to the motion filed by class counsel regarding class notice, the Court would

like to know: (1) why counsel allowed the notice violation to occur and failed to monitor the

claims administrator’s execution of the notice plan, and (2) further particulars of how the claims

administrator, Gilardi & Co., LLC, failed to send notices in electronic format as ordered under the

approved notice plan. The declarations filed with counsel’s motion provide insufficient

information about how this oversight occurred. Counsel shall respond to this order BY 9:00 A.M.

ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 589 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
-  Home 

# Multimodal Transportation Indicators

## 	Multimodal Transportation Indicators

This report provides a broad range of quarterly, monthly, and weekly statistics for the transportation community. It was developed by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and is updated every two months on the BTS website.

The indicators fall under two general categories: those that provide context about the economy and society in which transportation functions, and those that convey information about an aspect of transportation. These latter indicators are either transportation-wide in scope or apply to a specific aspect of the transportation system.

For indicators that are highly seasonal, the current value of that indicator is compared to the same time period in the previous year (e.g., October 2012 compared to October 2011). Otherwise, the tables show a comparison of the current value to a comparable preceding period of time (e.g., the data for the month of October 2012 compared to that of September 2012).

NOTE: This report was renamed from "Key Transportation Indicators" in August 2011. This replaced the earlier Transportation Indicators report, which was last published in December 2002.

**Most Recent Report:**December 2015

### 	Past Reports

                      -  Multimodal Transportation Indicators Releases
                      -  Transportation Indicators Releases

### 	Sources

                      -  Other Federal Sources of Data
#### Gail A. Connelly, Respondent, v John P. Connelly, Appellant.

*1033Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff-respondent commenced an action for divorce on January 21, 1975 and secured an order on March 4, 1975 granting her temporary alimony and an allowance for counsel fees. On August 4, 1975 when the trial started, defendant-appellant was in arrears in the sum of $650 for alimony and $500 for counsel fees. After the action was partially tried the trial court permitted the parties to amend their pleadings so that each party sought an annulment rather than a divorce. The court granted each of them an annulment and further ordered the defendant to pay the arrearages in alimony and counsel fees. An additional allowance for counsel fees in the sum of $500 was granted, the temporary order having provided for the right to apply for such additional allowance upon the trial of the action. The trial court also ordered an equal division of the personal property of the parties. Defendant appeals from that part of the judgment providing for the payment of alimony, attorney’s fees and division of the personal property. If the defendant felt aggrieved by the terms of the temporary order, he should have sought an expeditious resolution of the claimed inequities by requesting a prompt trial, which he could have had *(Margulies v Margulies,*52 AD2d 567; *Tobias v Tobias,*36 AD2d 643). In the circumstances the trial court quite properly required the defendant to pay the arrearages which had accumulated by the time of trial. The record amply supports the disposition made by the final judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—support, counsel fees.) Present—Simons, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Den-man and Goldman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imperial Petroleum Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Edward C. Gaiennie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and
Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By:      /s/ Edward C. Gaiennie                                 July 20, 2006
   --------------------------------------------------
      Edward C. Gaiennie
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0033. N’ZI LUXURY AUTO SALES, LLC v. NNEOMA S. IDIKA NDUKWE.

A22A0034. NNEOMA S. IDIKA NDUKWE v. N'ZI LUXURY AUTO SALES, LLC.

NneomaS.IdikaNdukwe filed an action forfraud and other claims against N’ZILuxury

Auto Sales, LLC (“N’ZI”). The trial court entered default judgment in favor of Ndukwe in the

amount of $9,786.23. In Case No. A22A0033, N’ZI filed a direct appeal from that order. In

Case No. A22A0034, Ndukwe filed a cross-appeal from the same order. Ndukwe has moved

to dismiss N’ZI’s appeal. We lack jurisdiction in both cases.

Appealsin all actionsfor damagesin which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less must be

pursued by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga.

App. 357, 357 (509SE2d 655)(1998). “[C]ompliancewith the discretionaryappeals procedure

is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). N’ZI’s

failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over Case No.

A22A0033.

Although no party has moved to dismiss the appeal in Case No. A22A0034, it is

incumbent upon an appellate court to inquire into its own jurisdiction. See State v. Rowe, 308

Ga. 806, 808 (2) (a) (843 SE2d 537) (2020); MSM Poly, LLC v. Textile Rubber & Chem. Co.,

353 Ga. App. 538, 539 (1)(839 SE2d 4)(2020).Because thisCourt must have jurisdiction over

a valid appeal in order to have jurisdiction over a cross-appeal, we necessarily must dismiss

Ndukwe’s cross-appeal. See Jarrard v. Copeland, 205 Ga. App. 20, 21 (421 SE2d 84) (1992).

Forthe foregoing reasons, Ndukwe’s motion to dismissis GRANTED and both appeals

are hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 06, 2021

08/06/2021
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Ronald
R. Helm, Chief Executive Officer, and John P. Jensen, Vice President of Finance
and Controller, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2008

                                        /s/ Ronald R. Helm
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Ronald R. Helm,
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ John P. Jensen
                                        --------------------------------
                                        John P. Jensen
                                        Vice President of Finance and Controller
exv10w1



 






AMENDMENT LETTER TO EXCLUSIVE PATENT

AND KNOW HOW LICENCE




19 January 2006




Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation

600 West Germantown Pike

Suite 400

Plymouth Meeting

PA 19462

USA




Dear Sirs





				
	 	Re:	 	Exclusive Patent and Know How Licence Agreement between pSiOncology Pte
Limited (“Licensor”), Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation (“Licensee”) and pSiMedica Limited
(“pSiMedica”) dated 26th October 2005 (“the Licence”)






The parties wish to amend the Licence as follows:




1. Clause 1 — Definitions



Sub-clause 1.15

Delete the words “its Associates” after the words “invoiced by the Licensee”.



Sub-clause 1.22

Delete the words “its Associates” after the words “sales between or among Licensee”.




2. Clause 3.2 — Condition Precedent and Clause 6 Milestone Payments



The time period of 90 calendar days referred to twice in clause 3.2 (Condition Precedent) and once
in clause 6 (Milestone Payments) shall be extended to 180 calendar days.




3. Clause 23.9 — Entire Agreement



Insert the following wording after the words “confidentiality agreement dated 11 July 2005,”:



“the letter dated 26th October 2005 from pSiMedica addressed to Martyn Greenacre of
Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation, referring to Clauses 14.1.2 and 14.1.3 and disclosing patent
searches in its appendix,”


 









 





Save for the amendments referred to above, all other provisions of the Licence shall remain
unaltered. The amendments provided in this letter shall take immediate effect.



Please confirm your agreement by signing, dating and returning the counterpart of this letter.




Yours faithfully




ROGER BRIMBLECOMBE




Dr. Roger Brimblecombe

Chairman

pSiMedica Limited




Agreed by and on behalf of Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation




Signed: MARTYN GREENACRE


Authorized Signatory




Name: M.D. Greenacre




Dated: Jan. 20 06
#### § 230.14 Arbitration.

Any controversy or claim between USAID and any noteholder arising out of this Guarantee shall be settled by arbitration to be held in Washington, DC in accordance with the then prevailing rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.