alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK STANISLAW MUSZINSKI,

Petitioner,

 vs.

LARRY SMALL, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-4244 CRB (PR)

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's order

granting respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus as

untimely.

Respondent shall file an opposition, or notice of non-opposition, within 30

days of this order, and petitioner shall file a reply to any opposition within 15

days thereafter.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 6, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.08\Muszynski, M1.or3.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04244-CRB Document 26 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 1
(PAGE) 1

                        Exhibit 21.1
                        SUBSIDIARIES
               THE SABRE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.



THE SABRE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
 (EACH SUBSIDIARY'S SUBSIDIARIES OUTLINED FURTHER BELOW)*

   The SABRE Group, Inc. (Delaware)

THE SABRE GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
   
   Axess International Network, Inc. (Japan) (25%)
   ENCOMPASS Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   Prize Ltd. (Latvia) (50%)
   SABRE Decision Technologies International, Inc.
   (Delaware)
   SABRE Decision Technologies Licensing, Inc. (Delaware)
   SABRE International Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
   SABRE International, Inc. (Delaware)
   SST Finance, Inc. (Delaware)
   SST Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   TSGL, Inc. (Delaware)
   Ticketnet Corporation (Canada)
   SABRE Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware)
   The SABRE Group Sales (Barbados), Ltd.
   SABRE Technology Enterprises, Ltd. (Cayman Island)

ENCOMPASS HOLDING, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   ENCOMPASS (partnership) (50%)

SABRE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Decision Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd.

SABRE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   SABRE Belgium (Belgium) (99%)
   SABRE Computer-Reservierungssystem GmbH (Austria)
   SABRE Danmark ApS (Denmark)
   SABRE Deutschland Marketing GmbH (Germany)
   SABRE Deutschland Services GmbH (Germany)
   SABRE Espana Marketing, S.A. (Spain) (99%)
   SABRE Europe Management Services Ltd. (UK) (99%)
   SABRE France Sarl (France)
   SABRE Hellas SA (Greece)
   SABRE Ireland Limited (Ireland)

(PAGE) 2
SABRE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES* - CONTINUED

   SABRE Italia S.r.l. (Italy) (99%)
   SABRE Marketing Nederland B.V. (The Netherlands)
   SABRE Norge AS (Norway)
   SABRE Portugal Servicos LDA (Portugal) (99%)
   SABRE Servicios Colombia LTDA (Columbia) (99%)
   SABRE Suomi Oy (Finland)
   SABRE Sverige AB (Sweden)
   SABRE UK Marketing Ltd. (UK) (99%)
   STIN Luxembourg S.A. (Luxembourg) (99%)

SABRE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   SABRE Belgium (Belgium) (1%)
   SABRE Espana Marketing, S.A. (Spain) (1%)
   SABRE Europe Management Services Ltd. (UK) (1%)
   SABRE Italia S.r.l. (Italy) (1%)
   SABRE Portugal Servicos LDA (Portugal) (1%)
   SABRE Servicios Colombia LTDA (Columbia) (1%)
   SABRE UK Marketing Ltd. (UK) (1%)
   STIN Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg) (1%)
         
SST HOLDING, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Sociedad Tecnologica S.A. (Mexico) (51%)
   
SABRE SOCIEDAD TECNOLOGICA S.A. SUBSIDIARY*
   
   SABRE Services Administration (Mexico)

SABRE TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES, LTD. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Technology Enterprises II, Ltd.

TSGL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   TSGL Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   TSGL-SCS, Inc. (Delaware)

TICKETNET CORPORATION SUBSIDIARY*

   148548 Canada, Inc. (Canada)


*  All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise noted
in parenthesis



(/TEXT)
(/DOCUMENT)
(/SUBMISSION)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1421

_____________________________
L AWRENCE W ILLIAM P ATTERSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineff ective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

November 7, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

R OWE , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

___________________________ __ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lawrence William Patterson, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Att orney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
FINALREPORTcSubmittedto:cPreparedby:LSIMedienceCorporationOctober7,20141cc2cc3cc4c5c06c07008009001001100120013014001500160017001800190020002102200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004604704800490050005100520053Appendix10Appendix1-10Appendix1-2Appendix200Appendix2-1()--Appendix2-2Appendix300Appendix3-10()Appendix3-200Appendix3-3Appendix40()Appendix4-100Appendix4-20()Appendix4-30Appendix4-400Appendix4-50()Appendix4-60Appendix4-7Appendix4-800Appendix4-900Appendix4-1000Appendix4-11cAppendix4-120Appendix4-1300Appendix4-1400Appendix4-15Appendix4-1600Appendix4-170Appendix4-180()Appendix4-1900Appendix4-2000Appendix4-21cAppendix4-2200Appendix4-2300Appendix4-240Appendix4-2500Appendix4-26C)0Appendix4-27c0Appendix4-2800Appendix4-290Appendix4-3000Appendix4-310()Appendix4-32()()Appendix4-3300Appendix4-3400Appendix4-350Appendix4-3600Appendix4-370cAppendix4-3800Appendix4-390Appendix4-4000Appendix4-410(_)Appendix4-42()Appendix4-430Appendix4-4400Appendix4-450Appendix4-4600Appendix4-4700Appendix4-4800Appendix4-4900Appendix4-5000Appendix4-510Appendix4-520Appendix4-53Appendix5c(57pages)Appendix5-lC''Appendix5-2cAppendix5-3cAppendix5-40cAppendix5-5C',;Appendix5-6Appendix5-700Appendix5-800Appendix5-90Appendix5-l000Appendix5-1100Appendix5-1200Appendix5-1300Appendix5-1400Appendix5-1500Appendix5-1600Appendix5-17.0Appendix5-1800Appendix5-190Appendix5-2000Appendix5-210Appendix5-220Appendix5-2300Appendix5-240C!Appendix5-250Appendix5-2600Appendix5-2700Appendix5-280C:Appendix5-2900Appendix5-3000·Appendix5-3100Appendix5-3200Appendix5-3300Appendix5-3400Appendix5-350cAppendix5-3600Appendix5-3700Appendix5-3800Appendix5-3900Appendix5-4000Appendix5-4100Appendix5-4200Appendix5-4300Appendix5-4400Appendix5-450Appendix5-4600Appendix5-470c;Appendix5-4800Appendix5-4900Appendix5-5000Appendix5-510cAppendix5-5200Appendix5-530cAppendix5-5400Appendix5-5500Appendix5-5600Appendix5-57Appendix60(51pages)Appendix6-10cAppendix6-200Appendix6-30cAppendix6-400Appendix6-50Appendix6-600Appendix6-700Appendix6-80cAppendix6-900Appendix6-100Appendix6-110cAppendix6-120Appendix6-1300Appendix6-1400Appendix6-150Appendix6-160Appendix6-1700Appendix6-180Appendix6-1900Appendix6-200Appendix6-2100Appendix6-220Appendix6-2300Appendix6-240Appendix6-2500Appendix6-26Appendix6-2700Appendix6-28c0Appendix6-290C:Appendix6-300cAppendix6-310Appendix6-3200Appendix6-3300Appendix6-3400Appendix6-350Appendix6-360Appendix6-37c0Appendix6-3800Appendix6-390cAppendix6-4000Appendix6-4100Appendix6-420Appendix6-4300Appendix6-44ccAppendix6-4500Appendix6-460cAppendix6-470Appendix6-4800Appendix6-490()Appendix6-5000Appendix6-51Appendix7c(24pages)cAppendix7-10cAppendix7-200Appendix7-300Appendix7-400Appendix7-5c0Appendix7-600Appendix7-70Appendix7-800Appendix7-9c0Appendix7-1000Appendix7-1100Appendix7-120Appendix7-1300Appendix7-1400Appendix7-1500Appendix7-1600Appendix7-1700Appendix7-180Appendix7-190cAppendix7-20ccAppendix7-210Appendix7-22ccAppendix7-23ccAppendix7-24
§ 35.24 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the ALJ may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the ALJ;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the ALJ;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, classified material, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding, or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; or
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the ALJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jay A. Unger, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed October 25, 1977. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.
#### Leona Marshall, Respondent, v. Harold J. McGee et al., Appellants. Walter Marshall, Respondent, v. Harold J. McGee et al., Appellants.

Present — Heffeman, Brewster, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
§ 192.44 Maximum limitation on benefits. ( a ) In no event may assistance be provided under this subpart for any individual for a period in excess of 45 months, or the equivalent thereof in part-time education or training.
( b ) The eligibility of a spouse for benefits under paragraph (c) or (d) of § 192.41 shall expire on a date which is 10 years after the date of the release of the captive or the death of the captive while in captivity, respectively. The eligibility of a dependent child for benefits under § 192.41 (c) and (d) shall expire on the 21st birthday of such child.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Odum, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief: (1) from so much of an order of the County Court, Queens County, dated November 30, 1961, as denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered January 26, 1960 after trial, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree, and sentencing him to serve a term of 5 to 10 years; and (2) from an order of said court dated December 14, 1961, made upon reargument, which adhered to the original determination. Order of December 14, 1961, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from order of November 30, 1961, dismissed. That order was superseded by the order of December 14, 1961, granting reargument. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE GILBERTO AGUILAR. §

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00369-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100D03082-243-1)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
§ 146.140 Dissemination of policy. ( a ) *Notification of policy.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall implement specific and continuing steps to notify applicants for admission and employment, students and parents of elementary and secondary school students, employees, sources of referral of applicants for admission and employment, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, that it does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs or activities that it operates, and that it is required by Title IX and these Title IX regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification shall contain such information, and be made in such manner, as the designated agency official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Title IX and these Title IX regulations, but shall state at least that the requirement not to discriminate in education programs or activities extends to employment therein, and to admission thereto unless §§ 146.300 through 146.310 do not apply to the recipient, and that inquiries concerning the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to such recipient may be referred to the employee designated pursuant to § 146.135, or to the designated agency official.
( 2 ) Each recipient shall make the initial notification required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section within 90 days of September 29, 2000 or of the date these Title IX regulations first apply to such recipient, whichever comes later, which notification shall include publication in: ( i ) Newspapers and magazines operated by such recipient or by student, alumnae, or alumni groups for or in connection with such recipient; and
( ii ) Memoranda or other written communications distributed to every student and employee of such recipient.
( b ) *Publications.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall prominently include a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section in each announcement, bulletin, catalog, or application form that it makes available to any person of a type, described in paragraph (a) of this section, or which is otherwise used in connection with the recruitment of students or employees.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not use or distribute a publication of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that suggests, by text or illustration, that such recipient treats applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is permitted by these Title IX regulations.
( c ) *Distribution.* Each recipient shall distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex each publication described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and shall apprise each of its admission and employment recruitment representatives of the policy of nondiscrimination described in paragraph (a) of this section, and shall require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
Case 3:08-cv-01567-JL Document 20 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-01567-JL Document19 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-01567-JL Document 20 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-01567-JL Document19 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER REGARDING 

CLASS MEMBER ROBERT

WESTERVELT

Counsel shall advise the Court BY NOON ON FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2010, whether first-class

mailed notice to class member Robert Westervelt was returned to the claims administrator as

“undeliverable,” and if so, whether Mr. Westervelt was one of the 600 or so class members where

a new mailing address could not be located. Please file the response in the form of a declaration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 733 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3945 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3945

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 171.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 171.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 171.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Acid Blue 171,      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (Cobaltate(2-),                                                    31/2014.......
                        [6-(amino-kN)-5-
                        [2-[2-(hydroxy-
                        kO)-4-
                        nitrophenyl]diaze
                        nyl-kN1]-
                        nitrophenyl]diaze
                        nyl-kN1]-2-
                        naphthalenesulfon
                        ato(3-)]-, sodium
                        (1:2)) (CAS No.
                        75314-27-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.12.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §16165. Savings clause

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect the authority of the Secretary of Transportation that may exist prior to August 8, 2005, with respect to—

(1) research into, and regulation of, hydrogen-powered vehicles fuel systems integrity, standards, and safety under subtitle VI of title 49;

(2) regulation of hazardous materials transportation under chapter 51 of title 49;

(3) regulation of pipeline safety under chapter 601 of title 49;

(4) encouragement and promotion of research, development, and deployment activities relating to advanced vehicle technologies under section 5506 1 of title 49;

(5) regulation of motor vehicle safety under chapter 301 of title 49;

(6) automobile fuel economy under chapter 329 of title 49; or

(7) representation of the interests of the United States with respect to the activities and programs under the authority of title 49.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VIII, §821, formerly §816, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 855; renumbered §821, Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, §40314(1), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1008.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5506 of title 49, referred to in par. (4), was repealed by Pub. L. 112–141, div. E, title II, §52010(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 887.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 303.12 Denials. ( a ) A denial of a written request for a record or information that complies with the requirements of § 303.7 shall be in writing and shall include, as applicable: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the responsible IDA;
( 2 ) The signature of the agency's FOIA Officer, or in the case of denials of requests concerning OIG records, the signature of the Inspector General or designee;
( 3 ) A brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including any FOIA exemption applied in denying the request;
( 4 ) An estimate of the volume of any records or information withheld, such as the number of pages or some other reasonable form of estimation, although such an estimate is not required if the volume is otherwise indicated by redactions marked on records that are disclosed in part or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption;
( 5 ) For any information denied under Exemption 3, the specific statute relied upon to deny the information along with a short description of the statute;
( 6 ) A statement that the requester must appeal no later than 90 days after the date of the denial and along with instructions on how to appeal to the appellate authority. The instructions will include the appellate authority's duty title, the mailing address for the appeal, and instructions on how the requester can appeal electronically; as defined under § 303.13; and
( 7 ) A statement notifying the requester of the assistance available from the Peace Corps' FOIA Public Liaison and the dispute resolution services offered by OGIS.
( b ) [Reserved]
[89 FR 25525, Apr. 11, 2024]
§ 206.6 Considerations in determining whether production or disclosure should be made pursuant to a demand. ( a ) In deciding whether to make disclosures pursuant to a demand, the General Counsel, or his designee, may consider, among things: ( 1 ) Whether such disclosure is appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose, and
( 2 ) Whether disclosure is appropriate under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege.
( b ) Among the demands in response to which disclosure will not be made are those demands with respect to which any of the following factors exist: ( 1 ) Disclosure would violate a statute or a rule of procedure,
( 2 ) Disclosure would violate a specific regulation,
( 3 ) Disclosure would reveal classified information, unless appropriately declassified by the originating agency,
( 4 ) Disclosure would reveal trade secrets or proprietary information without the owner's consent,
( 5 ) Disclosure would otherwise adversely affect the foreign policy interets of the United States or impair the foreign assistance program of the United States, or
( 6 ) Disclosure would impair an ongoing Inspector General or Department of Justice investigation.
#### Francis Noah, Appellant, v. Leo Berger et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before January 17, 1961.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27641]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of a Meeting

December 8, 2004.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 16, 2004.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session:
    Secretary of Labor v. Colorado Lava, Inc., Docket No. EAJ 2001-2. 
(Issues include whether Colorado Lava, as a prevailing party in an 
administrative proceeding, is entitled to a fee award under the 1996 
amendments to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), and 
the implementing regulations of the Federal Mine Safety and Health 
Review Commission, 20 CFR 2704.105(b).)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 04-27641 Filed 12-14-04; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M