alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300gg–133. Provider requirements with respect to disclosure on patient protections against balance billing

Beginning not later than January 1, 2022, each health care provider and health care facility shall make publicly available, and (if applicable) post on a public website of such provider or facility and provide to individuals who are participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees of a group health plan or group or individual health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer a one-page notice (either postal or electronic mail, as specified by the participant, beneficiary, or enrollee) in clear and understandable language containing information on—

(1) the requirements and prohibitions of such provider or facility under sections 300gg–131 and 300gg–132 of this title (relating to prohibitions on balance billing in certain circumstances);

(2) any other applicable State law requirements on such provider or facility regarding the amounts such provider or facility may, with respect to an item or service, charge a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee of a group health plan or group or individual health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer with respect to which such provider or facility does not have a contractual relationship for furnishing such item or service under the plan or coverage, respectively, after receiving payment from the plan or coverage, respectively, for such item or service and any applicable cost-sharing payment from such participant, beneficiary, or enrollee; and

(3) information on contacting appropriate State and Federal agencies in the case that an individual believes that such provider or facility has violated any requirement described in paragraph (1) or (2) with respect to such individual.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2799B–3, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §104(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2829.)
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2008\2261\Order re Mtn to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUGUSTINE FALLAY,

Plaintiff,

    v.

SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY,et al.,

Defendant.                                                                      /

No. C 08-2261 CRB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’SMOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMAPAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED.  The affidavit

accompanying Plaintiff’s motion indicates that Plaintiff and his spouse earn at least $3,600

per month and own a home, a luxury automobile, and a bank account with Bank of America. 

Thus, Plaintiff has not established that he “cannot because of his poverty pay or give security

for costs and still be able to provide himself and his dependents with the necessities of life.” 

Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 14, 2010                                                             CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02261-CRB   Document 120   Filed 07/14/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-10T21:52:51-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### §285j–1. Spinal cord regeneration research

The Director of the Institute shall conduct and support research into spinal cord regeneration.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §458, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 857.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Interagency Committee on Spinal Cord Injury

Pub. L. 99–158, §7, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 881, provided that:

"(a) Establishment.—Within 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 20, 1985], the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish in the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke an Interagency Committee on Spinal Cord Injury (hereafter in this section referred to as the 'Interagency Committee'). The Interagency Committee shall plan, develop, coordinate, and implement comprehensive Federal initiatives in research on spinal cord injury and regeneration.

"(b) Committee Composition and Meetings.—(1) The Interagency Committee shall consist of representatives from—

"(A) the National Institute on Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke;

"(B) the Department of Defense;

"(C) the Department of Education;

"(D) the Veterans' Administration;

"(E) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; and

"(F) the National Science Foundation;

designated by the heads of such entities.

"(2) The Interagency Committee shall meet at least four times. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall select the Chairman of the Interagency Committee from the members of the Interagency Committee.

"(c) Report.—Within the 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 20, 1985], the Interagency Committee shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a report concerning its activities under this section. The report shall include a description of research projects on spinal cord injury and regeneration conducted or supported by Federal agencies during such 18-month period, the nature and purpose of each such project, the amounts expended for each such project, and an identification of the entity which conducted the research under each such project.

"(d) Termination.—The Interagency Committee shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Interagency Committee transmits the report required by subsection (c) to the Congress."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SHAUN RUSHING , ) AKA SHAUN AKINDOALEXANDER RUSHING ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
v. ) Civil Action No. 1: 23

- cv - 00167 ( UNA ) ) U

- HAUL STORAGE AND MOVING , ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint, ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s IFP application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

. S ee Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff, a resident of the District of Columbia, sues a U

- Haul Storage and Moving business also located in the District. He alleges that, on January 17, he attempted to access his storage unit and was unfairly denied access to same. As a result, he con tends that he had to leave his property unattended overnight and that it was stolen. He alleges that defendant committed “negligence” and “malpractice” and demands approximately $104 million in damages. So his claim appears to sound in tort or, perhaps, breach of contract

. The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal di strict courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdi ction is available only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead factsthat bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such
facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12( h)(3). First, plaintiff’s claims fail to raise a ny federal question. Second, both plaintiff and
defendant are located in the District of Columbia , so there can be no diversity jurisdiction

. See
Bush v. Butler , 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger , 437 U.S. 365, 373

- 74 (1978)) ( “For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the plaintiff m ay not be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.” )

. Therefore, this court cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this matter.
For all of these reasons , th e complaint, ECF No. 1, and the case , is dismissed without prejudice

. A separate o rder accompanies this memorandum o pinion.
SO ORDERED.

Date: February 8, 2023

___________ /s/

____________ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge
#### YaYa BAH, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondent.

No. 06-1758.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 12, 2007.

Filed: March 6, 2007.

*367Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri, Nwaneri & Associates, St. Paul, MN, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Evans, Office of Immigration Litigation, David E. Dauenheimer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

YaYa Bah, a native and citizen of Gambia, petitioned for asylum and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied his asylum petition as untimely and his other claims as without merit. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed. Bah now seeks review. We deny the petition for review.

Bah was placed in removal proceedings six months after the expiration of his temporary visa. Bah conceded that he was removable but petitioned for asylum and relief under CAT. Bah claimed political persecution because of his membership in the United Democratic Party, Gambia’s main opposition-political party. Bah also claimed that members of the controlling party confronted him twice. However, he admitted that he was not injured in either incident.

The IJ determined that Bah’s petition for asylum was time barred. The IJ also found that Bah’s other claims lacked credibility and denied CAT relief. The BIA affirmed.

The factual and legal basis of Bah’s appeal are the same as a companion petition recently reviewed by this court in *Jallow v. Gonzales,*472 F.3d 569 (8th Cir.2007). For the reasons articulated in *Jallow,*we deny Bah’s petition for review.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,486
<SECURITIES>                                     6,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,300
<INVENTORY>                                     51,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               464,858
<PP&E>                                         115,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,258,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,827,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,296,188
<COMMON>                                       224,980
<OTHER-SE>                                  (7,103,873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,258,930
<SALES>                                        299,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,447
<CGS>                                          215,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  829,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (782,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (782,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (782,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
§ 215.10 Disclosure of record to person other than the individual to whom it pertains. ( a ) Subject to the conditions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Agency shall not disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person or other agency who is not the individual to whom the record pertains.
( b ) Upon written request or with prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains, the Agency may disclose any such record to a person or to another agency as requested or authorized.
( c ) Notwithstanding the absence of written consent from the individual to whom the record pertains, the Agency may disclose any such record provided such disclosure is: ( 1 ) To those officers and employees of the Agency who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( 2 ) Required under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552);
( 3 ) For a routine use as defined in § 215.2;
( 4 ) To the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the provisions of title 13 of the United States Code;
( 5 ) To a recipient who has provided the Agency with adequate advance written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( 6 ) To the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Administrator of General Services or his or her designee, to determine whether the record has such value;
( 7 ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity authorized by law: Provided, The head of the agency or instrumentality has made a prior written request to the Assistant Administrator of Administration or the Privacy Liaison Officer, specifying the particular record and the law enforcement activity for which it is sought;
( 8 ) To a responsible person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure notification will be transmitted to the last known address of such individual;
( 9 ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of a matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee, or joint committee of Congress, or subcommittee of such joint committee;
( 10 ) To the Comptroller General, or any of his/her authorized representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the General Accounting Office;
( 11 ) Pursuant to an order of a court of competent jurisdiction or;
( 12 ) To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with section 3711(f) of title 31.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2005 (the "Report"),
I, Donald R. Mastropietro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
--------------------------------------
Donald R. Mastropietro
Chief Financial Officer
November 21, 2005

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of  PetCARE  Television
Network,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on May 14, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Philip M. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Philip M. Cohen
-----------------------
Philip M. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2
                       New York Regional Rail Corporation
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Regional Rail Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Russell J. Arnst, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Russell J. Arnst
Russell J. Arnst, Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer

May 11, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New York Regional Rail Corporation and will retained by New York
Regional Rail Corporation and furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
(September 23, 1953.)

#### In the Matter of Ellis Monroe et al., as Executors of Paul Monroe, Deceased, Appellants, against Spencer E. Bates et al., Constituting the New York State Tax Commission, Respondents.

Motion for reargument, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 805.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To Exclusively License U.S. Army Invention

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
intent to exclusively license a U.S. Army Invention entitled Moving 
Target Indication Algorithm for Video Surveillance Applications. The 
invention intended to be licensed has been assigned to the United 
States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, 
Washington, DC.
    Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory intends to exclusively or partially 
exclusively license the invention listed below to videoNEXT Network 
Solutions, LLC, a small business which is interested in manufacturing, 
using and/or selling devices or processes involved in this invention.
    Title: Moving Target Indication Algorithm for Video Surveillance 
Applications.
    Inventors: Alex Chan.
    Patent Number: Provisional Application, Registration No. 39,612.
    Issued Date: Filed September 13, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norma Cammarata, Technology Transfer 
Office, AMSRD-ARL-DP-T, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-
1197; tel: (301) 394-2952, fax: (301) 394-5818.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27572 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.331 Form N-CSR, certified shareholder report.

This form shall be used by registered management investment companies to file reports pursuant to § 270.30b2-1(a) of this chapter not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under § 270.30e-1 of this chapter.

[68 FR 5365, Feb. 3, 2003]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form N-CSR, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### § 241.7 Fiscal Agent obligations.

Failure of the Fiscal Agent to perform any of its obligations pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall not impair any Noteholder's rights under this Guarantee, but may be the subject of action for damages against the Fiscal Agent by USAID as a result of such failure or neglect. A Noteholder may appoint the Fiscal Agent to make demand for payment on its behalf under this Guarantee.