alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300e–14. Annual report

(a) The Secretary shall periodically review the programs of assistance authorized by this subchapter and make an annual report to the Congress of a summary of the activities under each program. The Secretary shall include in such summary—

(1) a summary of each grant, contract, loan, or loan guarantee made under this subchapter in the period covered by the report and a list of the health maintenance organizations which during such period became qualified health maintenance organizations for purposes of section 300e–9 of this title;

(2) the statistics and other information reported in such period to the Secretary in accordance with section 300e(c)(11) 1 of this title;

(3) findings with respect to the ability of the health maintenance organizations assisted under this subchapter—

(A) to operate on a fiscally sound basis without continued Federal financial assistance,

(B) to meet the requirements of section 300e(c) of this title respecting their organization and operation,

(C) to provide basic and supplemental health services in the manner prescribed by section 300e(b) of this title,

(D) to include indigent and high-risk individuals in their membership, and

(E) to provide services to medically underserved populations; and

(4) findings with respect to—

(A) the operation of distinct categories of health maintenance organizations in comparison with each other,

(B) health maintenance organizations as a group in comparison with alternative forms of health care delivery, and

(C) the impact that health maintenance organizations, individually, by category, and as a group, have on the health of the public.

(b) The Office of Management and Budget may review the Secretary's report under subsection (a) before its submission to the Congress, but the Office may not revise the report or delay its submission, and it may submit to the Congress its comments (and those of other departments or agencies of the Government) respecting such report.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1315, as added Pub. L. 93–222, §2, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 933.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 300e(c)(11) of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), was redesignated section 300e(c)(9) of this title by Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §942(d)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 574, and redesignated section 300e(c)(8) of this title by Pub. L. 100–517, §5(b), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2579.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Woodson Hobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: June 11, 2004                 
|                                     
|/s/ WOODSON HOBBS                    
|Woodson Hobbs                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald R. Helm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.






Date:     November 14, 2005                              /s/ Ronald R. Helm
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Ronald R. Helm,
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
exv4w15



 






Exhibit 4.15








	This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the transfer agent and the registrar.




	number




	shares




	CUSIP: TO COME
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF




	FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE, OF COMMON STOCK OF NGTV, a California
corporation, transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney
on surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed.




	Dated:




	Witness the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers




	Kourosh Taj
President




	Jay Vir
Secretary




	COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED
U.S. STOCK TRANSFER CORPORATION
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR




	BY




	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
§ 146.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
#### In the Matter of Gregory Deary, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 369]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered November 22, 2005, in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

On November 4, 1992, petitioner was sentenced as a youthful offender to 1 to 3 years in prison upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree. He was received by the Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter DOCS) on November 20, 1992 and credited with 25 days of jail time. On December 17, 1993, following his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, petitioner was sentenced to a concurrent term of SVs to 25 years in prison. Crediting the time that petitioner served in prison from November 20, 1992 to December 17, 1993, DOCS determined that his parole eligibility date was February 24, 2001. DOCS did not apply this credit in calculating *1075petitioner’s maximum expiration and conditional release dates, which it determined were November 21, 2018 and July 21, 2010, respectively. Petitioner filed a grievance challenging DOCS’ computation, which was denied by the Central Office Review Committee. He then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was dismissed by Supreme Court. Petitioner now appeals.

Petitioner asserts that the credit applied in calculating his parole eligibility date should also have been applied in computing his maximum expiration and conditional release dates. We disagree. While Penal Law § 70.30 (1) (a) provides that persons serving multiple concurrent indeterminate sentences shall receive credit for prison time served under such sentences against the minimum periods of all sentences, it does not provide for application of the same credit against the maximum terms of imprisonment *(see Matter of Dillard v Annucci,*30 AD3d 917, 919 [2006]; *People ex rel. Bleiwas v Commissioner of Correctional Servs.,*19 AD3d 899, 900 [2005]; *Matter of Latham v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*296 AD2d 675, 675-676 [2002], *appeal dismissed*99 NY2d 531 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 508 [2003]). Rather, the maximum terms of imprisonment are satisfied only “by discharge of the term which has the longest unexpired time to run” (Penal Law § 70.30 [1] [a]). Accordingly, inasmuch as DOCS properly computed petitioner’s maximum expiration and conditional release dates, we find no reason to disturb its determination.

Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 6, 2009
    By:
    /s/ SALVATORE IANNUZZISalvatore IannuzziChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### BEHRENS, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Henry Behrens against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. C. F. Brown, for appellant B. E. De Groot, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment modified, by striking out extra allowance, and the judgment, as so reduced to the sum of $2,205.32, and order appealed from, affirmed, with costs.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 41177 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
AGUSTO LAZO

- AGUIRRE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 15

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Agusto Lazo

- Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Lazo

- Aguirre has filed a respons e. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Lazo

- Aguirre ’ s
response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 5, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-41177 Document: 00515022744 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2019No. 18

- 41177

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, co unsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-41177 Document: 00515022744 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2019
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes an Approval of the Amendment to the 
Tribal-State Compact between the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk 
Indians and the State of California.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 20, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary-
Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Amendment increases the 
number of gaming devices that the Tribe may operate and extends the 
term of the Compact until December 31, 2025.
    The Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, is 
publishing notice that the Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact 
between the State of California and the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk 
Indians is in effect.

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 04-27713 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
§ 1300.2 Organization. ( a ) MCC's Board consists of: ( 1 ) The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the United States Trade Representative; and the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation; and
( 2 ) four other individuals with relevant international experience from the private sector; appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
( b ) MCC's staff is comprised of the following administrative units: ( 1 ) The Office of the Chief Executive Officer;
( 2 ) The Department of Accountability;
( 3 ) The Department of Administration and Finance;
( 4 ) The Department of Congressional and Public Affairs;
( 5 ) The Department of Operations;
( 6 ) The Department of Policy and International Relations; and
( 7 ) The Office of the General Counsel.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4298 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to conduct a review of the forms related 

to obtaining workers’ compensation benefits under the Federal Black 

Lung Benefits Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. MCKINLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to conduct a review of 

the forms related to obtaining workers’ compensation 

benefits under the Federal Black Lung Benefits Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burdensome Paper5 work Reduction for Our Miners Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF BLACK LUNG FORMS. 

7 (a) REVIEW.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor, actVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:22 Apr 04, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4298.IH H4298

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4298 IH

1 ing through the Director of the Division of Coal Mine 

2 Workers’ Compensation and the Chief Information Officer 

3 of the Department of Labor, and in consultation with the 

4 Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall 

5 conduct a review of the forms related to obtaining workers’ 

6 compensation benefits under the Federal Black Lung Ben7 efits Program to determine whether it is feasible to com8 bine or reduce such forms in order to further the purposes 

9 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 

10 104–13). 

11 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 1 year after 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 

13 implement any feasible combination or reduction of the 

14 forms related to obtaining workers’ compensation benefits 

15 under the Federal Black Lung Benefits Program identi16 fied in the review conducted under subsection (a). 

17 (c) REPORTS.— 

18 (1) INITIAL REPORT OF REVIEW.—Not later 

19 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

20 this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to Con21 gress that describes the findings of the review con22 ducted under subsection (a). 

23 (2) REPORT OF IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later 

24 than 1 year after the Secretary implements any com25 bination or reduction of the forms related to obtainVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:22 Apr 04, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4298.IH H4298

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4298 IH

1 ing workers’ compensation benefits under the Fed2 eral Black Lung Benefits Program under subsection 

3 (b), the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress 

4 that describes such implementation. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principals;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 30, 2009
    By:
    /s/ SALVATORE IANNUZZISalvatore IannuzziChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76017-76018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27745]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby

[[Page 76018]]

given that a meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel, Partnerships section 
(Regional Partnership Agreements category) to the National Council on 
the Arts will be held by teleconference from 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. EST 
on January 25, 2005 from Room 710 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506. This meeting will be 
open.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, (202) 682-5532, 
TDY-TDD (202) 682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 
682-5691.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 04-27745 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P