alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jake:

On April 8 th , 2015 Mr. Joseph Hexter, SAIC Project C ontrol Analyst, assigned to the FAA Unmanned Aircraft Integration Office (AFS

- 80), contacted Mr. Andrew McCollough, head of Regulatory Services at SkyWard IO, Inc. Mr. Hexter stated he was in the process of reviewing the SkyWard petition for exemption and would like to advance the process; however, there were some areas where clarification would be appreciated. Mr. Hexter inquired about carriage of medicines as described in the SkyWard IO petition for exemption. Mr. McCollough confirmed that carriage of m edicine was listed as an example of what could be carried by SkyWard UAS; though, this was not being considered in their business model. Mr. Hexter asked about SkyWard’s intent regarding aerial dispersal and Mr. McCollough stated SkyWard’s home office

was in Oregon and the company envisioned flying multiple sUAS (instead of one large UAS like the RMAX helicopter) to spray grape vines at local vineyards. Mr. Hexter stated it was unlikely that SkyWard would receive authorization to do so under FMRA section 333, and recommended SkyWard review 14 CFR, part 137, Agricultural Operations. Lastly, Mr. Hexter inquired about use of First Person View (FPV), as its use was mentioned in one of the documents supplied. A constructive conversation followed covering FAA requirements for a visual observer and the need for line of sight operations without visual aids other than glasses.

Joseph Hexter / SAIC Project Control Analyst

- NextGen Initiatives Support Services Contract Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Of fice (AFS

- 80) Email: joseph.a

- ctr.hexter@faa.gov Direct: 202

- 267

- 4606 Cell: 301

- 514

- 7969
School and Municipal Advisory Servi< 

Donal d OOVey , CPA . CF O I lOe Kensington Coun I Charlotte. Ml 48813 I (517)231-0563 | donsovey®gmail.com 

February 18,2012 "^ <^'v • 

U.S. Department of Transportation - Docket Management Facility -^ ro^ri; ' 

— P'~ C^y 

U.S Department of Transportation ~ '^^:^~-^^ 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-12G140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Department officers and personnel, 

I am a resident of Charlotte which is served by Capital Region International Airport in Lansing, 

Michigan. My new business and numerous other businesses and organizations are highly dependent 

on the Sun Country Airlines service from Lansing to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The 

Lansing area is the home of Michigan State University, State of Michigan government and many 

statewide associations that communicate on a regular basis with Washington D.C. General Motors 

Corporation hosts a major presence in our area as do several large insurance companies such as Auto 

Owners Insurance Company and Jackson National Life. 

I am in support of Sun Country's appeal to keep flying form Lansing to Washington, D.C. This route is 

critical to the continuing economic development efforts of our region, particularly due to the high 

concentration of statewide and nationally known organizations described above. 

According to airport officials, whom I have personally met, this exemption will not adversely affect 

safety, since the airline has provided safe service on the route since last April. Since that time, this 

route has been used by 48,000 passengers. 

I ask that you please seriously consider the request under Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. 

FAA-2012-0089, so that our economic development efforts may successfully continue in the Greater 

Lansing area. 

Very truly yours. 

Donald Sovey, CPA, CFO
AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS 

# TEMPORARY REVISION 2A−53 

# C

Dec 15/10 TR# 2A−53 Airworthiness Requirements Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual Appendix A − Certification Maintenance Requirements Page 1 of 1 The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Chief, Engineering (or designate), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada Civial Aviation Date October 15, 2010 Signed Remy Knoerr


### FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this Temporary Revision (TR) 2A−53 facing page 2A−14, in Part 2 of the Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of the MRM Part 2. Keep this Temporary Revision until normal revision service incorporates this information into the Maintenance Requirements Manual. DESCRIPTION: This Temporary Revision is issued to revise the TASK DESCRIPTION of CMR TASK NUMBER C76−11−127−01.

TASK

NO. TASK DESCRIPTION TASK INTERVAL CMR Category (*) or (**) C76−11−127−01 Special Detailed Inspection of the throttle control gearbox rack and gear teeth engagement wear and verification of torque value on the mounting hardware EFFECTIVITY: P/N 2100140−003, −005, −007 NOTE: Airworthiness Directive issued PHASE−IN: Do the initial inspection within 1000 Flight Hours from the issue date of TR 2A−47 (May 27/09). 1000 Flight Hours (**)
§ 181.3 Determinations with respect to international agreements. ( a ) Whether any undertaking, document, or set of documents constitutes or would constitute an international agreement within the meaning of the Act shall be determined by the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, a Deputy Legal Adviser, or in most cases the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs. Such determinations shall be made either on a case-by-case basis, or on periodic consultation, as appropriate.
( b ) Agencies whose responsibilities include the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements are responsible for transmitting to the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, for decision pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the text, as defined in § 181.10, of any document or set of documents that might constitute an international agreement. The transmittal shall be made prior to or simultaneously with the request for consultations with the Secretary of State required by subsection (g) of the Act and § 181.6.
( c ) Agencies to which paragraph (b) of this section applies shall consult periodically with the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs in order to determine which categories of arrangements for which they are responsible are likely to be international agreements within the meaning of the Act.
Case 3:08-cv-02766-CRB Document 5 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-02766-CRB Document 5 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 191.22 Administration of benefits. ( a ) An eligible person, who desires medical or health care under this subpart or any person acting on behalf thereof, shall submit an application to the Office of Medical Services, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 (hereafter referred to as the “Office”). The applicant shall supply all relevant information, including insurance information, requested by the Director of the Office. An eligible person may also submit claims to the Office for payment for emergency care when there is not time to obtain prior authorization as prescribed by this paragraph, and for payment for care received prior to or ongoing on the effective date of these regulations.
( b ) The Office shall evaluate all requests for care and claims for reimbursement and determine, on behalf of the Secretary of State, whether the care in question is authorized under § 191.21 of this subpart. The Office will authorize care, or payment for care when it determines the criteria of such section are met. Authorization shall include a determination as to the necessity and reasonableness of medical or health care.
( c ) The Office will refer applicants eligible for benefits under other Government health programs to the Government agency administering those programs. Any portion of authorized care not provided or paid for under another Government program will be reimbursed under this subpart.
( d ) Eligible persons may obtain authorized care from any licensed facility or health care provider of their choice approved by the Office. To the extent possible, the Office will attempt to arrange for authorized care to be provided in a Government facility at no cost to the patient.
( e ) Authorized care provided by a private facility or health care provider will be paid or reimbursed under this subpart to the extent that the Office determines that costs do not exceed reasonable and customary charges for similar care in the locality.
( f ) All bills for authorized medical or health care covered by insurance shall be submitted to the patient's insurance carrier for payment prior to submission to the Office for payment of the balance authorized by this part. The Office will request the health care providers to bill the insurance carrier and the Department of State for authorized care, rather than the patient.
( g ) Eligible persons will be reimbursed by the Office for authorized travel to obtain an evaluation of their claim under paragraph (b) of this section and for other authorized travel to obtain medical or health care authorized by this subpart.
### §§3041 to 3041f. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–478, title V, §501(a), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1558

Section 3041, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 50, related to provisions for grants or contracts. See sections 3028 and 3030d(b)(1) of this title.

A prior section 3041, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §501, July 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 224; Pub. L. 91–69, §8, Sept. 17, 1969, 83 Stat. 111, which related to training project grants and contracts, training programs, studies, preparation and dissemination of materials, and conferences, was repealed by Pub. L. 93–29, title IV, §401, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 45.

Section 3041a, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 50, related to requirements for approval of applications, preferred areas, and agency cooperation.

Section 3041b, Pub. L. 89–73, title V §503, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 51, provided for payments, reservation from appropriations amount of grant or contract, amendments, advances, reimbursement, and installments.

Section 3041c, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 51, provided for recapture of payments. See section 3030b of this title.

Section 3041d, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 51; amended Pub. L. 94–135, title I, §112(e), Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 720, provided for authorization of appropriations. See section 3023 of this title.

Section 3041e, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 51, related to mortgage insurance for Multipurpose Senior Centers.

Section 3041f, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title V, §501, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 54; amended Pub. L. 94–135, title I, §114(g), Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 725, related to annual interest grants.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–478, title V, §501(a), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1558, provided that the repeal by that section is effective at the close of Sept. 30, 1978.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 243]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2617]]

Public Law 111-243
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon 
Parkway in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, 
 Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''. <<NOTE: Sept. 
                       30, 2010 -  [H.R. 3562]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    The Administrator of General Services shall ensure that the 
federally occupied building located at 1220 Echelon Parkway in Jackson, 
Mississippi, is known and designated as the ``James Chaney, Andrew 
Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    With respect to the period in which the building referred to in 
section 1 is federally occupied, any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Chaney, 
Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and Roy K. Moore Federal Building''.

    Approved September 30, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3562:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-414 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Mar. 23, 24, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Sept. 15, 16, House considered and concurred in Senate 
                amendments.

                                  <all>
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER RE THE TRIAL DATE

With respect to the trial date, it will be left at May 10, 2010, but it may have to trail

another large earlier trial that will likely still be underway when May 10 arrives. The actual start

date for the Schwab trial may (or may not) slip to the week of May 17. Not having the luxury to

move the start date to the following week, the Court must ask counsel and witnesses to be flexible

and adjust, being ready to go as scheduled, as well as trailing as necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02058-WHA Document 54 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 191.13 Administration of benefits. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary of State for Administration will issue certifications or other documents when required for purposes of the Civil Relief Act.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary of State shall whenever possible promptly inform the chief legal officer of each State in which hostages maintain residence of all persons determined to be hostages eligible for assistance under this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINSTRATION

[Notice 04-148]


NASA Robotic and Human Exploration of Mars Strategic Roadmapping 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Robotic and Human 
Exploration of Mars Strategic Roadmapping Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, January 
5, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Thursday, January 6, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 
Pacific standard time.

ADDRESSES: Spitzer Science Center/Keith Spalding, Room 410, 200 East 
California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tracey Abbott at (818) 393-7106.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the meeting room. Attendees will be requested 
to sign a register.
    The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Mars science: What we know today.
--Science planning for exploring Mars.
--Overview of robotic science missions.
--Challenges of Mars robotic and human exploration.
--Human mission studies, options, and technology needs.
--Key issues to be studied.

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-27890 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RICHARD RAUSCH, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-08-03186 EDL

ORDER

On January 19, 2010, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment,

which was brought against Defendant Edward Heckerson only. Defendant Heckerson did not file an

opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment despite the Court’s continuance of the December

22, 2009 hearing date to give Mr. Heckerson an opportunity to oppose. Defendant Heckerson also

failed to appear to the January 19, 2010 hearing. 

As discussed with Plaintiff’s counsel at the hearing, the Court defers ruling on Plaintiff’s

Motion. No later than February 9, 2010, Plaintiff shall either file additional declarations to support

Plaintiff’s standing to bring this lawsuit or inform the Court that Plaintiff will submit the Motion on

the evidence currently in the record. 

In addition, only Plaintiff and Defendant Heckerson have consented to the Court’s

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Default was entered against Defendant Rausch, and

Defendant Whiting has answered the complaint but has not consented to magistrate judge

jurisdiction. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall also inform the Court by February 9, 2010 whether it will

Case 3:08-cv-03186-EDL Document 62 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

dismiss the other Defendants from this case as discussed at the hearing or whether Plaintiff requests

that the Court sever the case against Defendant Heckerson to be heard by this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03186-EDL Document 62 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Ronald Gales, Petitioner, v Police Department of the County of Nassau, Respondent.

Proceedings by petitioner Ronald Gales pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the *625respondent, each made after a hearing, and each of which found him guilty of two specifications of failure to obey lawful orders, as follows: (1) the first dated October 8, 1974 which fined him five days’ pay on each specification and (2) the second dated December 2, 1974 which dismissed him from his position of auto mechanic. Determination dated October 8, 1974 modified, on the law, by (1) deleting therefrom the finding of guilt as to two specifications of failure to obey lawful orders and substituting therefor a finding of guilt as to one specification of failure to obey lawful orders and (2) reducing the fines imposed to one fine of five days’ pay. As so modified, determination confirmed and petition otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Determination dated December 2, 1974 modified, on the law, by (1) deleting therefrom the finding of guilt as to two specifications of failure to obey lawful orders and substituting therefor a finding of guilt as to one specification of failure to obey lawful orders and (2) reducing the penalty of dismissal to a fine of five days’ pay. As so modified, determination confirmed and proceeding otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Respondent is directed to reinstate petitioner to his position with back pay and any other benefits to which he may be entitled, retroactive to October 9, 1974, the date of his suspension, less the amount of compensation earned in any other employment or occupation and any unemployment benefits he may have received during such period. (See *Matter of Coe v Police Department of the County of Nassau,*57 AD2d 619.) Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.
### §3233. Authorization of appropriations for disaster economic recovery activities

#### (a) In general

In addition to amounts made available under section 3231 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out section 3149(c)(2) of this title, to remain available until expended.

#### (b) Federal share

The Federal share of the cost of activities funded with amounts made available under subsection (a) shall be up to 100 percent.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title VII, §703, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(b)(3), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3233, Pub. L. 89–136, title VIII, §803, as added Pub. L. 93–288, title V, §501, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 161, authorized provision of funds for recovery investment plans, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(c), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3617.

A prior section 703 of Pub. L. 89–136 was classified to section 3213 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(b)(3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
§ 5.2 Central and field organization. ( a ) The central organization of the Department of State is prescribed by the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, as amended (Pub. L. 84-885), codified at 22 U.S.C. 2651 *et seq.* and the Foreign Affairs Manual (see § 5.5).
( b ) As used in this part, the term “Department of State” includes all offices within the Department in Washington, its domestic field offices in the United States, all U.S. diplomatic and consular posts throughout the world, and U.S. missions to international organizations unless otherwise specified.
( c ) Any person desiring information concerning a matter handled by the Department of State, or any person desiring to make a submittal or request in connection with such a matter, should communicate either orally or in writing with the appropriate office. If the office receiving the communication does not have jurisdiction to handle the matter, the communication, if written, will be forwarded to the proper office, or, if oral, the person will be advised how to proceed. When the submittal or request from a member of the public consists of a formal application for one of the documents, privileges, or other benefits provided for in the laws administered by the Department of State, or in the regulations implementing these laws, the member of the public should follow the instructions on the form as to preparation and place of submission.
( d ) From time to time, the Secretary of State will, to the extent authorized by law, delegate statutory or other authorities to subordinate officers, as authorized by 22 U.S.C. 2651a(a)(4). The Department will generally publish such delegations of authority in the Federal Register.