75938 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 2004 / Notices 

Act (14 U.S.C. 1681a(f)) or the Federal 

Claims Collection Act of 1966 (31 U.S.C. 

3701(a)(3)). The purpose of this 

disclosure is to aid in the collection of 

outstanding debts owed to the Federal 

government, typically to provide an 

incentive for debtors to repay 

delinquent Federal government debts by 

making these debts part of their credit 

records. 

The disclosure is limited to 

information necessary to establish the 

identity of the individual, including 

name, address, and taxpayer 

identification number (Social Security 

Number), the amount, status, and 

history of the claim; and the agency or 

program under which the claim arose 

for the sole purpose of allowing the 

consumer reporting agency to prepare a 

commercial credit report.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Paper records and on automated 

storage media. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Name and/or Social Security Number 

(SSN). 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Records are accessed by person(s) 

responsible for servicing the record 

system in performance of their official 

duties and who are properly screened 

and cleared for need-to-know. Records 

are stored in security file containers/

cabinets and safes, protected by guards, 

and controlled by personnel screening, 

visitor registers and computer system 

software. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Paper records are destroyed 10 years 

after employment is terminated. 

Electronic records are maintained and 

purged by payroll contractor and 

destroyed in the 7th year after 

origination. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Policy Official: Commander, Navy 

Installations Millington Detachment, 

5720 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN 

38055–6500. 

Record Holder: Non-appropriated 

fund activities in the Department of the 

Navy. Official mailing addresses are 

published in the Standard Navy 

Distribution List that is available at 

http://neds.daps.dla.mil/sandl.htm.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information about themselves should 

address written inquiries to the 

commanding officer of the activity in 

question. Official mailing addresses are 

published in the Standard Navy 

distribution List that is available at 

http://neds.daps.dla.mil/sndl.htm.

The request should include full name, 

Social Security Number, address of the 

individual concerned and should be 

signed. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking access to 

information about themselves contained 

in this system should address written 

inquiries to the commanding officer of 

the activity in question. Official mailing 

addresses are published in the standard 

Navy Distribution List that is available 

at http://neds.daps.dla.mil/sndl.htm.

The request should include full name, 

Social Security Number, address of the 

individual concerned and should be 

signed. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

The Navy’s rules for accessing 

records, and for contesting contents and 

appealing initial agency determinations 

are published in Secretary of the Navy 

Instruction 5211.5; 32 CFR part 701; or 

may be obtained from the system 

manager. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Individual; employee’s supervisor; 

local Morale, Welfare, and Recreation 

(MWR) Activities’ Personnel Offices; 

Internal Revenue Service; credit 

bureaus; Commander, Navy Installations 

Command, Millington Detachment; and 

contractors who process payroll Navy 

MWR activities. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None.

[FR Doc. 04–27700 Filed 12–17–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Hearing; Proposal To 

Amend the Administrative Procedure 

and Fee Schedule for the Renewal of 

Projects Under Section 3.8 and Article 

10 of the Delaware River Basin 

Compact

AGENCY: Delaware River Basin 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

SUMMARY: The Delaware River Basin 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) will hold 

a public hearing to receive comments on 

a proposed amendment to the 

Commission’s administrative procedure 

and fee schedule for the renewal of 

project approvals under Section 3.8 and 

Article 10 of the Delaware River Basin 

Compact.

DATES: The public hearing will be held 

during the Commission’s regularly 

scheduled business meeting on January 

19, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. Persons wishing to 

testify at the hearing are asked to 

register in advance with the 

Commission by phoning 609–883–9500, 

extension 224. Submission of written 

comments by January 14, 2005 would be 

appreciated, but written comments will 

be accepted through the close of the 

public hearing on Wednesday, January 

19, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be 

held in the Goddard Room of the 

Commission’s office building at 25 State 

Police Drive in West Trenton, New 

Jersey. Written comments should be 

addressed to the Commission Secretary 

as follows: by e-mail to 

paula.schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us; by fax to 

609–883–9522; by U.S. Mail to 

Commission Secretary, DRBC, P.O. Box 

7360, West Trenton, NJ 08628–0360; or 

by overnight mail to Commission 

Secretary, DRBC, 25 State Police Drive, 

West Trenton, NJ 08628–0360.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

full text of the proposed amendment is 

posted on the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.drbc.net. Please contact 

Commission Secretary Pamela Bush, 

609–883–9500 ext. 203, with questions 

about the proposed action.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission’s fee schedule for the 

review of projects under Section 3.8 and 

Article 10 of the Delaware River Basin 

Compact is set forth in Resolution No. 

2003–14, duly adopted by the 

Commission on June 26, 2003. The 

proposed amendments to the schedule 

would add provisions (a) for the 

administrative continuance of dockets 

and permits (collectively, ‘‘approvals’’) 

pending Commission action on renewal 

applications that are timely submitted; 

and (b) imposition of a fee of $1,000, in 

addition to the ordinary review fee, for 

the review of renewal applications not 

submitted in a timely fashion. In 

accordance with the proposed 

amendment, a docket holder or 

permittee whose approval has been 

administratively continued will not be 

subject to penalties for operating 

without a docket or permit during the 

period between expiration of the 

approval and Commission action on an 

application for renewal, provided that 

the docket holder or permittee will be 

responsible for violations of the terms 

and conditions of its approval to the 

same extent as if the approval had been 

renewed prior to its expiration. 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 2004 / Notices 75939

In order to phase in the new program, 

the proposed rule sets forth one timeline 

for approvals that expire before October 

1, 2005 and another for approvals that 

expire on or after October 1, 2005. 

Approvals expiring before October 1, 

2005 are proposed to be 

administratively continued pending 

issuance of a docket renewal when the 

docket holder or permittee submits a 

complete application within 90 calendar 

days after receipt of a written notice 

from the Executive Director or by 

September 30, 2005, whichever is 

earlier. The Executive Director may 

extend the deadline for good cause 

shown in the event a substantially 

complete application, along with the 

full fee, is submitted by the deadline. 

The fee of $1,000, payable in addition 

to the ordinary fee, is proposed to be 

charged for renewal applications 

submitted after September 30, 2005. 

Approvals expiring after September 

30, 2005 are proposed to be 

administratively continued pending 

issuance of a docket renewal when the 

docket holder or permittee submits a 

complete application at least 120 

calendar days in advance of the 

expiration date. If the approval 

establishes a different application 

submission date, the docket or permit is 

controlling. Again, the Executive 

Director may extend the deadline for 

good cause shown, in the event a 

substantially complete application, 

along with the full fee, is submitted by 

the deadline. A fee of $1,000 above the 

ordinary fee is proposed to be charged 

for renewal applications submitted 

fewer than 120 calendar days before the 

approval’s expiration date. 

The amendment provides for the 

Executive Director to implement 

procedures to furnish written notice to 

docket holders and permittees in 

advance of their approval expiration 

dates, reminding them to file a timely 

renewal application. However, failure of 

the Executive Director to send such 

notice or lack of receipt of the notice by 

the docket holder or permittee will not 

relieve the docket holder or permittee of 

any obligation or condition or create any 

defense.

Dated: December 13, 2004. 

Pamela M. Bush, 

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–27703 Filed 12–17–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6360–01–P

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: 

Proposed Amendments to the 

Comprehensive Plan and Water Code 

Relating to the Coordinated Operation 

of Lower Basin and Hydroelectric 

Reservoirs During a Basinwide 

Drought

AGENCY: Delaware River Basin 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Delaware River Basin 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or 

‘‘DRBC’’) will hold a public hearing to 

receive comments on proposed 

amendments to Section 2.5.5 of the 

Water Code, relating to the Coordinated 

Operation of Lower Basin and 

Hydroelectric Reservoirs During a 

Basinwide Drought. The Commission 

proposes to amend and codify changes 

to the Comprehensive Plan and Water 

Code effected by Resolution No. 2002–

33, approved in November 2002 by the 

Commission and the parties to the U.S. 

Supreme Court Decree in New Jersey v. 

New York, 347 U.S. 995 (1954) (‘‘Decree 

Parties’’). The amendments are for 

purposes of clarification and accuracy 

and to better ensure that the benefits of 

the changes effected by Resolution No. 

2002–33 are achieved without 

compromising habitat protection goals. 

Resolution No. 2002–33, which was not 

codified, in part amended the 

Comprehensive Plan and Water Code 

relating to the utilization of Lake 

Wallenpaupack during drought watch, 

drought warning and drought 

operations. The proposed changes are as 

follows: First, numbered paragraph 1 of 

Resolution No. 2002–33 provides that 

‘‘any and all provisions pertaining to the 

operation of Lake Wallenpaupack 

during basinwide drought warning also 

apply to basinwide drought watch as 

temporarily defined by the Commission 

in Docket No. D–77–20 CP.’’ The 

proposed amendment adds the 

parenthetical ‘‘(Revision 7 and 

following)’’ at the end of this sentence 

to make clear that the most current 

applicable revision of Docket No. D–77–

20 CP is intended to apply. Second, the 

inclusion of the term ‘‘drought watch’’

in brackets following every mention of 

‘‘drought warning’’ in the November 

2002 amendments is proposed to be 

deleted, because the Commission makes 

clear in numbered Paragraph 1 of the 

Resolution that provisions in Section 

2.5.5 of the Water Code pertaining to the 

operation of Lake Wallenpaupack 

during drought warning also are 

intended to apply to drought watch as 

defined by Docket No. D–77–20 CP 

(Revision 7 and following). Third, 

throughout the language added by 

Resolution No. 2002–33, the terms 

‘‘drought conditions’’ and ‘‘drought 

warning conditions’’ are replaced by 

‘‘drought operations’’ and ‘‘drought 

warning operations,’’ respectively, to 

more accurately reflect the fact that the 

reservoir management activities 

described are triggered by a set of 

reservoir drought operating rules 

established by the Commission and the 

Decree Parties, rather than by 

hydrologic conditions. Fourth, the 

November 2002 amendments inserted 

language at Section 2.5.5 of the Water 

Code stating that ‘‘[d]uring ‘drought’

and ‘drought warning’ operations * * *, 

‘‘the power companies shall release 

water only in accordance with 

Commission direction.’’ This statement 

is proposed to be changed to reflect the 

Commission’s intention that ‘‘[d]uring 

‘drought’ and ‘drought warning’

operations as defined in Figure 1 of 

Section 2.5.3.A. of the Water Code, 

releases from Lake Wallenpaupack shall 

be made only in accordance with 

Commission direction.’’ In a related 

amendment, a new sentence is proposed 

to be added to Section 2.5.5 addressing 

operation of the Mongaup reservoir 

system by the Commission, which may 

take place only under more limited 

circumstances. The proposed provision 

reads, ‘‘After issuance of a Conservation 

Order by the Commission, power 

generation releases from the Mongaup 

reservoir system shall be made only in 

accordance with Commission 

direction.’’ This statement restores the 

rule governing drought operation of the 

Mongaup system reservoirs to the rule 

in effect before the November 2002 

amendments. Fifth, the Commission 

proposes to add a clause providing that 

when it directs releases from Lake 

Wallenpaupack during drought watch 

(including warning) and drought 

operations, it must give consideration to 

any flow and temperature targets 

established by the Commission and the 

Decree Parties in the upper Delaware 

River and in the West Branch Delaware, 

East Branch Delaware, and Neversink 

rivers for the protection of the cold 

water fisheries in these streams.

DATES: The public hearing will be held 

during the Commission’s regularly 

scheduled business meeting on January 

19, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. Persons wishing to 

testify at the hearing are asked to 

register in advance with the 

Commission by phoning 609–883–9500, 

ext. 224. Submission of written 

comments by January 14, 2005 would be 

appreciated, but written comments will