alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 214.35 Minutes of meetings. ( a ) Minutes are to be kept of each meeting of each advisory committee and its formal and informal sub-groups.
( b ) The chairman or presiding officer designates a member or other person to keep the minutes.
( c ) The minutes are to include: ( 1 ) The time and place of the meeting;
( 2 ) A list of members, staff, and A.I.D. employees attending;
( 3 ) A complete summary of matters discussed and conclusions reached;
( 4 ) Copies of all reports received, issued, or approved;
( 5 ) The extent to which the meeting was open to the public; and
( 6 ) The extent of public participation, including a list of those who presented oral or written statements and an estimate of the number of those who attended the meeting.
( d ) The chairman or presiding officer of the advisory committee is to certify to the accuracy of the minutes. The certification is to indicate that “the minutes are an accurate and complete summary of the matters discussed and conclusions reached at the meeting held on (date(s)).”
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4347 Received in Senate (RDS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4347

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2012

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th 
   Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the ``Robert Boochever United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th Street in 
Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert Boochever 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Boochever United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### M. C. Conrad, Doing Business as M. C. Conrad Real Estate Agency, Respondent, v. J. Watson Golden, Appellant.

In our opinion the alleged contract upon which the action is based is too vague and indefinite to be enforced. It does not set forth the full intention of the parties with such certainty and explicitness that the intention of the parties may therefrom be ascertained with a reasonable degree of certainty. Moreover, the provision in the contract that it should terminate upon the mutual consent of the parties is mere surplusage, and the contract, without a term of its duration, was terminable at will. *(Petze*v. *Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.,*125 App. Div. 267, 270, affd. 195 N. Y. 584; *Varney*v. *Ditmars,*217 N. Y. 223, 228; *Ansorge*v. *Kane,*244 N. Y. 395, 398; *St. Regis Paper Co.*v. *Hubbs & Hastings Paper Co.,*235 N. Y. 30, 36; *Schlegel Mfg. Co.*v. *Cooper’s Glue Factory,*231 N. Y. 459, 462; *Clark Paper & Mfg. Co.*v. *Stenacher,*236 N. Y. 312, 316.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

560057.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS M. HERLIHY (SBN 83615)

JOHN T. BURNITE (SBN 162223)

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

525 Market Street, 17

th

Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-2725

Tel.: (415) 433-0990

Fax: (415) 434-1370

Email: herlihy@wilsonelser.com

john.burnite@wilsonelser.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNUM GROUP (previously known as

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION),

THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

and NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEWIS G. SHEPLER II, M.D.

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION; THE

PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY and UNUM GROUP, inclusive,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C08-00240 MEJ

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 88 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
-1-

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Case No.: C08-00240 MEJ

560057.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties, plaintiff Lewis G. Shepler II,

M.D. and defendants Unum Group (previously known as UnumProvident Corporation), The Paul

Revere Life Insurance Company, and New York Life Insurance Company (“defendants”), hereby

stipulate that defendants shall have an extension to respond to the Complaint up to and including

August 26, 2010.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

KNOX RICKSEN, LLP

Dated: July 8, 2010 By_______/s/____________________

Thomas E. Fraysse

Attorney for Plaintiff

LEWIS G. SHEPLER II, M.D.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN &

DICKER LLP

Dated: July 8, 2010 By_________/s/_____________________

Thomas M. Herlihy

John T. Burnite

Attorney for Defendants

UNUM GROUP (Previously known as

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION),

THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY and NEW YORK LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants have up to and including August 26, 2010 to

respond to plaintiff’s complaint.

Date: July __, 2010 _____________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 88 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 204.15 Paying agent obligations.

Failure of the Paying Agent to perform any of its obligations pursuant to the Paying and Transfer Agency Agreement shall not impair the Investor's or any Assignee's rights under this Contract of Guaranty, but may be the subject of action for damages against the Paying Agent by A.I.D. as a result of such failure or neglect; provided, however, that the Paying Agent is not authorized to issue and authenticate and have Notes outstanding at any time in excess of the principal amount of the Loan.
#### Tracey Cizek et al., Respondents, v Mark Aberbach, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 909]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated August 3, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, *inter alia,*finding him 65% at fault in the happening of the accident and finding that the plaintiffs suffered total damages in the amount of $101,000, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against him in the principal sum of $65,650.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

The infant plaintiff was allegedly injured when she was hit by a car driven by the defendant as she was crossing a two-lane road. The trial testimony failed to adduce any evidence that the defendant operated his vehicle in a negligent manner, and for that reason the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence *(cf., Miller v Sisters of Order of St. Dominic,*262 AD2d 373).

Were we not reversing on the ground of liability, we would reverse the judgment for the plaintiffs’ failure to establish that the infant plaintiff suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Though the infant plaintiff claimed that she suffered “permanent consequential limitation of use” and “significant limitation of use” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), of her right knee, the medical evidence proffered by her doctor failed to quantify or objectively measure the extent of the limitation *(see, McHaffie v Antieri,*190 AD2d 780). Bracken, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
### §2275. Receipt of Restricted Data

Whoever, with intent to injure the United States or with intent to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, acquires, or attempts or conspires to acquire any document, writing, sketch, photograph, plan, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information involving or incorporating Restricted Data, shall upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for life, or by imprisonment for any term of years or a fine of not more than $100,000 or both.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §225, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 959; amended Pub. L. 91–161, §3(b), Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 444; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944; Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3148(b), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 938.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–65 substituted "$100,000" for "$20,000".

1969—Pub. L. 91–161 made death penalty inapplicable for willful violation, or attempted violation of this section with intent to injure the United States, or secure an advantage for any foreign nation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1969 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–161 applicable to offenses committed on or after Dec. 24, 1969, see section 7 of Pub. L. 91–161, set out as a note under section 2272 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imperial Petroleum Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31,
2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Edward C. Gaiennie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and
Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By:      /s/ Edward C. Gaiennie                               July 20, 2006
   --------------------------------------------------
      Edward C. Gaiennie
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer




                                       25
#### § 206.5 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other authority declines to stay the effect of the demand in response to a request made in accordance with § 206.4 pending receipt of instructions, or if the court or other authority rules that the demand must be complied with irrespective of instructions not to produce the material or disclose the information sought, the employuee or former employee upon whom the demand has been made shall respectfully decline to comply with the demand, citing this part and *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1571-DR]


Alaska; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Alaska (FEMA-1571-DR), dated November 15, 2004, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this declared disaster is now October 18, 2004, through and 
including October 24, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-27624 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00212

- CR

IN RE DEDRICK MATTHEWS

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Dedrick Matthews has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to order the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County to grant relief as requested in Matthews’ “Pro Se Motion To Correct Illegal Sentence.”

Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code provides , “ E ach court of appeals for a court of appeals district may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, against: (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county

co urt in the court of appeals district.” T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221(b)(1) (Supp.) . The 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County is not located within our district. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.201(g) (Supp.) . It is located within the district of the Tyler Court of Appeals. T EX

. G OV ’ T
C ODE A NN

. § 22.201(m) (Supp.)

. Although Matthews’ underlying criminal appeal was transferred

to this C ourt pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court’s docket equalization order, such transfer does not confer jurisdiction on this Court in a separate original proceeding. See In re Davis , 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2002, orig. proceeding). We, therefore, dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice

Dat e Submitted: October 24 , 2019 Date Decided: October 25 , 2019

Do Not Publish
#### § 1429.3 Transfer of record.

In any case under part 1425 of this subchapter, upon request by the Board, the parties jointly shall transfer the record in the case, including a copy of the transcript, if any, exhibits, briefs and other documents filed with the Grievance Board, to the Board.
, City of 

SAINT ROBERT 

August 28, 2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief of the Essential Air Service Division 

Mr. Albert Muldoon 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer and Mr. Muldoon: 

Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment on the Essential Air Services 

proposals submitted for air service at the Waynesville/St. Robert Regional Airport at 

Forney Field on Fort Leonard Wood. We are very committed to providing exceptional air 

service to our surrounding coiilmunities, and with the partnership we have with the City of 

Waynesville and Fort Leonard Wood I feel it has been a very successful venture. 

It is the recommendation of the City of St. Robert and Waynesville, after review of the 

EAS proposals that were submitted, that the Cape Air proposal be renewed and a four year 

contract be accepted. 

We have been very pleased with the service and support to our communities that Cape Air 

has afforded us . 

. /~hJL_ George Sanders, Mayor 

City of St. Robert 

Mayor: George Sanders InterimCity Administrator: Anita Ivey City Clerk: Debra A. Adkins 

,.
### §2096. Acquisition of source material; payments

The Commission is authorized and directed, to the extent it deems necessary to effectuate the provisions of this chapter—

(a) to purchase, take, requisition, condemn, or otherwise acquire supplies of source material;

(b) to purchase, condemn, or otherwise acquire any interest in real property containing deposits of source material; and

(c) to purchase, condemn, or otherwise acquire rights to enter upon any real property deemed by the Commission to have possibilities of containing deposits of source material in order to conduct prospecting and exploratory operations for such deposits.

Any purchase made under this section may be made without regard to the provisions of section 6101 of title 41, upon certification by the Commission that such action is necessary in the interest of the common defense and security, or upon a showing by the Commission that advertising is not reasonably practicable. Partial and advanced payments may be made under contracts for such purposes. The Commission may establish guaranteed prices for all source material delivered to it within a specified time. Just compensation shall be made for any right, property, or interest in property taken, requisitioned, condemned, or otherwise acquired under this section.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §66, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 933; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

In text, "section 6101 of title 41" substituted for "section 3709 of the Revised Statutes, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1805(b)(5) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         310,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,853,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,731,000
<PP&E>                                      15,875,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,232,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,568,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,207,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,770,000
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     274,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,568,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,947,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             982,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,839,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,839,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,839,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
### NO. 12-14-00323-CV


### IN THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________________
DAVID TUBB, ET AL. APPELLANTS
V. ASPECT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. APPELLEES

__________________________________________________________________



### UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

CITE LETTER

_________________________________________________________________________ Appellees, Aspect International, Inc. and James Michael Sterling, request leave to file the letter containing a citation to a case mentioned in oral argument but not cited in the briefs,
submitted to the Court on November 17, 2015. WHEREFORE, Appellees request the Court to grant this motion and allow the filing letter containing a citation to a case mentioned in oral argument but not cited in the briefs.

1 ACCEPTED 12-14-00323-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 11/18/2015 1:29:25 PM

Pam Estes CLERKR e s p e c t f u l l y s u b m i t t e d , M

. K E I T H D O L L A H I T E , P

. C

. 5 4 5 7 D o n n y b r o o k A v e n u e T y l e r , T e x a s 7 5 7 0 3 ( 9 0 3 ) 5 8 1

- 2 1 1 0 ( 9 0 3 ) 5 8 1

- 2 1 1 3 ( F a c s i m i l e )
/ s / K e i t h D o l l a h i t e B y :__

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M

. K e i t h D o l l a h i t e S t a t e B a r N o
. 0 5 9 5 8 5 5 0

C E R T I F I C A T E O F C O N F E R E N C E

B e f o r e f i l i n g t h i s m o t i o n , G r e g S m i t h , t h e a t t o r n e y f o r A p p e l l a n t s , w a s c o n t a c t e d
a b o u t t h i s m o t i o n , a n d h e i n d i c a t e d h e d o e s n o t o p p o s e t h i s m o t i o n
.

/ s / K e i t h D o l l a h i t e

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

C E R T I F I C A T E O F S E R V I C E

T h i s d o c u m e n t w a s f i l e d a n d s e r v e d e l e c t r o n i c a l l y o n G r e g o r y D

. S m i t h , R a m e y & F l o c k , P

. C

. , 1 0 0 E a s t F e r g u s o n , S u i t e 5 0 0 , T yl e r , T e x a s 7 5 7 0 2 , g s m i t h @ r a m e y f l o c k

. c o m a n d W e s l e y H i l l , P

. O

. B o x 1 2 3 1 , L o n g v i e w , T e x a s 7 5 6 0 6 , w h @ s w f i r m
. c o m o n N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 1 5

. / s / K e i t h D o l l a h i t e

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2
#### Andrew B. Chura v. New York City Housing Authority.

Motion to resettle order entered on September 21, 1961 affirming the order of Special Term, dismissing the action denied on the following grounds: (1) in the light of section 590 of the Civil Practice Act the relief sought does not appear to be necessary; (2) the proposed resettled order does not accurately reflect the proceedings in this court or its disposition of the appeal; and (3) defendant-appellant has delayed unreasonably in seeking relief. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
#### COHEN, Appellant, v. URBACH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by Harris M. Cohen against Solomon Urbach and others. J. J. Lesser, for appellant. L. M. White, for respondents. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.