alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2000N-1399]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “ Presubmission Conference” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denver Presley, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 18, 2004 (69 FR 51162), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0555. The approval expires on November 30, 2007.                

Dated: December 6, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-27292 Filed 12-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
### §252. Medical examination of aliens

The Surgeon General shall provide for making, at places within the United States or in other countries, such physical and mental examinations of aliens as are required by the immigration laws, subject to administrative regulations prescribed by the Attorney General and medical regulations prescribed by the Surgeon General with the approval of the Secretary.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §325, 58 Stat. 697; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Surgeon General abolished by section 3 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, and functions thereof transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 1 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, set out as a note under section 202 of this title. Office of Surgeon General reestablished within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, see Notice of Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Mar. 30, 1987, 52 F.R. 11754.

Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.
1 John T. Boyd, Chi ef Ju stice (Ret.), Sevent h Court of Appeals, s itting by

assignment
. NO. 07-01-0415 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L E SEPTE MBE R 3, 2002

______________________________ BLANCA LIZETH QUACH, APP ELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE176 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY; NO. 851942; HON ORABLEMARY BACON , JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ, and BOYD, SJ. 1 On May 16 , 2001, appellant Blanca Lizeth Quach wa s adjudged guilty of murder and, on May 1 7, 2001, sentenced to 60 yea rs confinem ent in the Institutional Division of2

the Departm ent of Crim inal Justice. Appellant gave a timely notice of appeal and, und er equalization of docket proceedings, theappeal wastransf erred to this cour

tfor disposition. Appella nt’s attorney has now filed a motion to w ithdraw , toget her w ith an An ders brief. See And er

s v. Cal ifo rn ia , 398 U.S. 73 8, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967). In that brief, she certifies that afte r careful e xam ination of the record, she has concluded that appellant’s appeal is without me rit. Along with her brief, she hasattached a copy of a l etter sent to appellant notifying her of counsel’s intent to withdraw and appell ant’s right to proceed pro se. Thiscou rt a lso i nfo rm ed a ppe llant by letter d ate d A pril 24, 2002, that if she wished to file a response, she had until May 22, 2002, to do so. To da te, neithera response nor a m otion for extension of tim e to file a response has been received. In considering requests of this type, we mu st first satisfy ourselves that t he attorney has provided the client with a diligent and tho rou gh s ear ch of th e re cor

d fo r an y ar

gua ble claim that m ight support her client’s appeal. After doing so, w e m ust t he n d et er mi ne if counsel has correctly concluded the appeal is frivolous. See McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wis co ns in , 486 U.S. 42 9, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 100 L.Ed.2d 4 40 (1988); High v . State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 81 3 (Tex .Crim .App. 1978). In discussing whether any possible viable grounds for appeal exist, counsel gave a resum e of the pertinent evidence and noted t hat she found no viab le gr oun ds f or a ppe al. We also have m ade an independent exam ination of the entire record to determ ine whether3

thereare any arguable groun ds which might su pport the appeal. Staffer v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.C rim.App. 1991). W e have found no such grounds and agree w ith counsel that the appeal is without merit and i s, therefore, frivolous. Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex .Crim .App. 1974). Accordingl y, counsel’s m otion to withdraw is herebygranted and the j udgme nt of the trial court is affirmed. John T. Boyd Senior Justi ce Do not publish.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of
Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                   |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                   |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
Exhibit
32.1





Section
1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ JAMES H. LONGJames
      H. LongChief
      Executive Officer





August
12, 2008
#### § 196.3 Grants to post-secondary education institutions.

The Department of State may make a grant to a post-secondary education institution for the purpose of increasing the level of knowledge and awareness of and interest in employment with the Foreign Service, consistent with 22 U.S.C. 3905, not to exceed $1,000,000, unless otherwise authorized by law.
§ 1306.14 Request for a hearing for certain debts. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, an employee must file a request that is received by the official identified in the notice provided pursuant to § 1306.12(a)(11) not later than 15 calendar days from the date of MCC's notice if an employee wants a hearing concerning: ( 1 ) The existence or amount of the debt; or
( 2 ) MCC's proposed offset schedule.
( b ) The request must be signed by the employee and should identify and explain with reasonable specificity and brevity the facts, evidence and witnesses, if any, which the employee believes support his or her position. If the employee objects to the percentage of disposable pay to be deducted from each check, the request should state the objection and the reasons for it.
( c ) The employee must also specify whether an oral or paper hearing is requested. If an oral hearing is desired, the request should explain why the matter cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence alone.
( d ) If the employee files a request for a hearing later than the required 15 calendar days as described in paragraph (a) of this section, MCC may accept the request if the employee can show that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice of the filing deadline (unless the employee otherwise has actual notice of the filing deadline).
( e ) If the employee files a timely request for reconsideration pursuant to § 1306.13(b), the employee must file a request for a hearing by the official identified in the notice provided pursuant to § 1306.12(a)(11) not later than 15 calendar days from the date of MCC's written decision concerning the reconsideration request.
( f ) An employee waives the right to a hearing and will have his or her pay offset if the employee fails to file a petition for a hearing in accordance with this section.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1413V

Filed: September 30, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

MARGARET SCHWARCK,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Jeffrey T. Sprague, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On September 17, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

October 10, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

On September 27, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent concludes that petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with a SIRVA as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 7. Respondent 

further agrees that petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than 

six months. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rufus Ware, Appellant, against Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

— Motion for reconsideration of motion for leave to appeal as a poor person and for other relief denied on the ground that the papers submitted show as a matter of law that there is no merit in the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Arch C. Kearney, Respondent, against Bishop, McCormick & Bishop et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*697Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4338 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand certain restrictions relating 

to the overhaul and repair of vessels in foreign shipyards to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand certain 

restrictions relating to the overhaul and repair of vessels 

in foreign shipyards to the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OVERHAUL, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE OF 

4 VESSELS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE 

5 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 

6 Subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4338 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘the United States or Guam’’ 

2 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘the United 

3 States, Guam, or the Commonwealth of the North4 ern Mariana Islands’’; and 

5 (2) in the heading for such subsection, by strik6 ing ‘‘UNITED STATES OR GUAM’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘UNITED STATES, GUAM, OR COMMONWEALTH OF

8 THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert E. Kelley, Jr., Appellant.

Same decision as in *People*v. *Cheeks*(16 A D 2d 742). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of assault, second degree and assault, third degree.) Present—Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SCHWAB’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

No. 08-cv-01510 WHA

sf-2844995

DARRYL P. RAINS (CA SBN 104802)

EUGENE ILLOVSKY (CA SBN 117892)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

Facsimile: 650.494.0792

Email: DRains@mofo.com

CRAIG D. MARTIN (CA SBN 168195)

DOROTHY L. FERNANDEZ (CA SBN 184266)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for defendants The Charles Schwab Corporation, 

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Investment 

Management, Inc., Schwab Investments, Charles R. Schwab, 

Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, Matthew 

Hastings, Mariann Byerwalter, Donald F. Dorward, William A. 

Hasler, Robert G. Holmes, Gerald B. Smith, Donald R. 

Stephens, and Michael W. Wilsey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CHARLES SCHWAB CORP. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Master File No. C-08-01510-WHA

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SCHWAB’S MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL 

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 798 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SCHWAB’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

No. 08-cv-01510 WHA

sf-2844995

On May 19, 2010, Schwab filed an administrative motion to seal Exhibit D to the 

Stipulation of Settlement in support of the parties’ settlement of the federal claims in this case and 

Exhibit D to the Stipulation of Settlement in support of the parties’ settlement of the state claim in 

this case. The parties filed these two exhibits with the Court on May 19, 2010. In support of its 

administrative motion to seal, Schwab filed a declaration attesting to the confidentiality of these 

exhibits which were filed under seal. The Court finds that Schwab and its customers had a reasonable expectation of privacy 

regarding the settlement agreements that they entered into and that the information in the 

Exhibit Ds, related to these settlements, does not go to the merit of the parties’ claims in the 

pending litigation.

It is hereby ordered that Exhibit D to the Stipulation of Settlement in support of the 

parties’ settlement of the federal claims in this case and Exhibit D to the Stipulation of Settlement 

in support of the parties’ settlement of the state claim in this case, be SEALED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________, 2010

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

May 20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 798 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF WILLIAM J. HANNIGAN

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
William J. Hannigan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

|/s/WILLIAM J. HANNIGANWilliam J. Hannigan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

MORE QUESTIONS RE

PENDING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONS

By 5 P.M. TODAY, please answer the following questions, limiting your answers to what is

disclosed in the existing summary judgment record. Three double-spaced pages or less, please:

1. Did analysts pick up on the MBS definition change in 2006 and, if so, what did

they say about it?

2. Did any of the plaintiffs or class members pick up on the MBS definition change in

2006 and, if so, what did they say about it?

3. Was the MBS definition in 2006 customary (versus unusual) compared to other

mutual funds in the period, say, 2004–2007?

Dated: April 7, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 573 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 1
### §2000c–5. Payments; adjustments; advances or reimbursement; installments

Payments pursuant to a grant or contract under this subchapter may be made (after necessary adjustments on account of previously made overpayments or underpayments) in advance or by way of reimbursement, and in such installments, as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title IV, §406, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary", meaning the Secretary of Education, substituted in text for "Commissioner" pursuant to sections 301(a)(1) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(1) and 3507 of Title 20, Education, and which transferred all functions of Commissioner of Education to Secretary of Education.