alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4368 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4368

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the release 
          of Federal tax levies which cause business hardship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2012

   Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
 Rangel, Mr. Neal, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. 
  Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the release 
          of Federal tax levies which cause business hardship.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELEASE OF FEDERAL TAX LEVIES WHICH CAUSE BUSINESS HARDSHIP.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (D) of section 6343(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``or any trade or 
business of the taxpayer'' before ``, or''.
    (b) Criteria for Determining Business Hardship.--Subsection (a) of 
section 6343 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(4) Criteria for determining business hardship.--For 
        purposes of making a determination under paragraph (1)(D), with 
        respect to a trade or business of the taxpayer, the Secretary 
        shall take into consideration--
                    ``(A) the economic viability of such trade or 
                business,
                    ``(B) the nature and extent of the hardship, 
                including the extent to which the taxpayer exercised 
                ordinary business care and prudence, and
                    ``(C) any hardships which would be caused to other 
                individuals or businesses if such trade or business 
                were liquidated.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Betty Howard, Appellant, v Philip Toia, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated February 27, 1976 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to discontinue petitioner’s allowance for in-home child care services, petitioner appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 17, 1976, as dismissed the proceeding. Order and judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. There was no showing that the determination of the State commissioner, which affirmed the determination of the local agency, was either arbitrary or capricious. The undisputed fact that there are two "adult” siblings living in the home was an adequate basis upon which to find that no outside babysitter is needed. The issue of notice is not subject to judicial review since it was not raised at the fair hearing. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.
|   | 1. | The                Report of the Company filed pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies                with                the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act;                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 11, 2007 | /s/                Robert D.                Baca                                                  |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Robert                D. Baca, Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Date:                May 11, 2007 | /s/                Martin                Thorp                                          |
|                              | Martin                Thorp, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
### §2473b. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 101–144, title III, Nov. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 863; Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §611, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2932, related to award of prime and subcontracts to small businesses and disadvantaged individuals. First paragraph was repealed and reenacted as section 30304 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs. Last paragraph, requiring Administrator to submit plan for small and disadvantaged business goals within one year from Nov. 9, 1989, was repealed as obsolete.
No. 934.

#### Willing, Receiver, *v.*Binenstock et al.

May 24, 1937.

*Messrs. James M. Kane, Thomas J. Minnick, Jr.,*and *George P. Barse*for petitioner. *Mr. Robert T. Mc-Cracken*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.
Department of Homeland Security

Office of Inspector General 

Status of Disaster Recovery Planning 


for Information Systems at the 


Nebraska Avenue Complex 


(Unclassified Summary)
 

OIG-09-87 July 2009 
Office of Inspector General 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20528 

Status of Disaster Recovery Planning for Information Systems at 

the Nebraska Avenue Complex 

Unclassified Summary 

(OIG-09-87) 

___________________________________________________________________
 

We evaluated the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its organizational 

component disaster recovery programs at the Nebraska Avenue Complex. Our objective 

was to determine whether DHS components at this facility made progress in resolving the 

disaster recovery deficiencies we reported in May 2005. Specifically, we evaluated the 

ability of the DHS Office of the Chief Information Officer and the Office of Intelligence 

and Analysis to restore information systems processing at an alternate site if access to this 

shared facility was disrupted. 

The audit included an onsite verification and validation of facility operational security 

controls and a review of DHS policies, procedures, and other appropriate contingency 

planning documentation. While the department has strengthened its disaster recovery 

planning for the Nebraska Avenue Complex, more work is needed. We briefed DHS and 

component officials on the results of our audit and issued a classified report. We also 

made four recommendations to improve the department progress in establishing its 

disaster recovery programs. DHS concurred with our recommendations and is already 

addressing the findings. 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COPIES 

To obtain additional copies of this report, please call the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at (202) 254-4199, 

fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web site at www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG HOTLINE 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of criminal or noncriminal 

misconduct relative to department programs or operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, 

Attention: Office of Investigations - Hotline, 

245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.620 Cooperative agreement.

*Cooperative agreement* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition of grant in § 133.650), except that substantial involvement is expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award. The term does not include cooperative research and development agreements as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,424
<PP&E>                                         217,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,674
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,155
<SALES>                                        220,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,588
<CGS>                                          195,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (287)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          410
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,061
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Ellsworth Clark and Fred Tess, Jr., trading as Clark & Tess, appellants, v. Charles P. Dewey, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,084.

Action for commission upon the sale of real estate. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Stark county; the Hon. John M. Niehaus, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922.

Clarence W. Heyl and Harry C. Heyl, for appellants. John W. Fling, Jr. and James H. Rennick, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 192.20 Eligibility for benefits.

A person designated as a captive under subpart A of this subchapter, shall be eligible for benefits under this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,721,789
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 19,257,022
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,066,444
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         5,001,243
<LOANS>                                     66,516,866
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,184,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,173,587
<DEPOSITS>                                  85,357,388
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,550,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            787,518
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,978,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               9,478,681
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,446,884
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,067,325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                99,036
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,613,245
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,557,191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,592,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,020,520
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 230,0000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,474,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,698,756
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,152,073
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,358,434
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,048,076
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,086,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  140,824
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,243
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,184,399
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,184,399
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 10 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

STEVE ALLEN WELDON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS STATE

PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in his

official capacity, also known as James

Ferguson; WYOMING ATTORNEY

GENERAL,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-8041

(D.C. No. 96-CV-176)

(District of Wyoming)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of the

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
- 2 -

The matter is before us upon appellant’s petition for issuance of a certificate of

appealability. Because his petition was filed before April 24, 1996, the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1996) are not applicable, and a certificate of appealability is not

required to establish jurisdiction in this court. Lindh v. Murphy, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S. Ct.

2059 (1997). A certificate of probable cause is GRANTED, and we proceed to the

merits of this case.

After examination of Mr. Weldon’s brief and the record, we conclude the district

court did not err in the dismissal of the petition. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the district court’s order of dismissal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
§ 1507.12 Criminal penalties. Section 552a(e), title 5, United States Code, provides that: ( a ) Any officer or employee of the Foundation, who, by virtue of his or her employment or official position, has possession of, or access to, Foundation records which contain individually identifiable information, the disclosure of which is prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 552a, and who knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive it, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( b ) Any officer or employee of the Foundation who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the notice requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( c ) Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from the Foundation under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

QUESTIONS TO COUNSEL

REGARDING UNTIMELY 

OPT OUT REQUESTS

Counsel shall please respond to the following questions BY 5:00 P.M. TODAY:

1. With respect to the motion for late exclusion from the class filed by Mauer &

Associates Capital Management (Dkt. No. 776), counsel shall inform the Court whether Julia

Peay, Robert D. Bischoff, and the Wynona Dodge Trust are class members and, if so, whether

they filed timely opt-out requests.

2. With respect to all pending motions or requests filed by class members seeking

late exclusion from the class, counsel shall inform the Court whether they oppose the motion

(unless an opposition brief has already been filed). A “yes” or “no” answer as to each class

member will suffice. Additionally, if counsel agrees that any of these class members seeking late

exclusion from the class actually filed timely exclusion requests, counsel shall please inform the

Court.

Dated: May 26, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 803 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE

Appellate case name: In the Interest of S.L., S.E.L., A.S.L., and Z.E.N.L.

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00100

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 18283

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file

a s upplemental clerk’s record containing :

 Final Decree for Termination, signed on November 17, 2011 in Cause No. 2011

- 18283

( T r ansferred from 2011

- 0055J/315th Court) ( Image N o. 5 0631041 )

.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1).

The s upplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 7 days

of the date of this notice.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon

issuance of this Court’s judgment.

Clerk’s Signature:

Clerk of the Court

Date: March 3, 2015
### §290aa–18. Limitations on authority

In carrying out any program of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration whose statutory authorization is enacted or amended by this title, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall not allocate funding, or require award recipients to prioritize, dedicate, or allocate funding, without consideration of the incidence, prevalence, or determinants of mental health or substance use issues, unless such allocation or requirement is consistent with statute, regulation, or other Federal law.

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1501, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5706.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title I of div. FF of Pub. L. 117–328, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5634. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022 and also as part of the Health Extenders, Improving Access to Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP, and Strengthening Public Health Act of 2022, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Salvatore Iannuzzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ SALVATORE IANNUZZI
Salvatore Iannuzzi
Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 5, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks