alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL CLEVELAND,

Petitioner,

 v.

B. CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 08-0610 MMC (PR)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

On January 25, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at the Correctional

Training Facility, Soledad, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2006 decision by the California

Board of Prison Hearings (“Board”) to deny petitioner parole. Respondent has filed an

answer to the petition and petitioner has filed a traverse.

A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit addresses important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions. See Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th

Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). Consequently, the parties will be directed to file

supplemental briefs setting forth their respective views as to the effect, if any, of the

Hayward en banc decision on the Court’s determination of the instant petition.

Case 3:08-cv-00610-MMC Document 7 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than ten days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall send to

petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than twenty days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall file

and serve on petitioner a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Hayward on the instant

action. 

3. No later than twenty days from the date respondent’s supplemental brief is

filed, petitioner shall file and serve on respondent either a supplemental brief addressing the

impact of Hayward on the instant action or a notice that he does not intend to file such a

brief.

4. The parties’ respective supplemental briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages in length.

5. The matter will be deemed submitted on the date petitioner’s supplemental brief is

due. No extensions of time will be granted to file the supplemental briefs absent a showing

of exceptional circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00610-MMC Document 7 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. Ford,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Steven L. FordSteven L. Ford
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

43
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4128 

To recognize a primary measure of national unemployment for purposes 

of the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2012 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. 

DENHAM, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. QUAYLE, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. ISSA, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. BACHMANN, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. WALSH

of Illinois, and Mr. BILBRAY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To recognize a primary measure of national unemployment 

for purposes of the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Real Unemployment 

5 Calculation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRIMARY MEASURE OF UNEMPLOYMENT. 

7 The measure of unemployment issued by the Bureau 

8 of Labor Statistics known as U5 shall be treated by the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4128 IH

1 Bureau as the official unemployment rate and shall be 

2 considered by the Federal Government as the primary 

3 measure of unemployment in the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of New York Regional
Rail Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 19, 2002                                    /s/ Joel Marcus
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                        Name:  Joel Marcus
                                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
§ 1421.3 Exclusive recognition; Unfair labor practices. ( a ) *Exclusive Recognition* has the meaning as set forth in 22 U.S.C. 4111; and
( b ) *Unfair labor practices* has the meaning as set forth in 22 U.S.C. 4115.
**                                                             **

**   ****FOR          IMMEDIATE RELEASE**

**Contact:                                INVESTORS:                                Ann          Taylor**

**   (404)          676-5383**

**MEDIA:                      Dana          Bolden**

**(404)          676-3774**

**THE          COCA-COLA COMPANY COMMENTS ON MINI-TENDER          BY**

**K&N      VALUE SELECT CORPORATION**

**K&N’s      unsolicited mini-tender represents less than 5% of Coca-Cola’s      shares**

**ATLANTA,      Nov. 15, 2007**

**###**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date:

The meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, December 15, 2004. 

# Place:

Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The entire meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matter to be Considered at the Meeting:

Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia S. Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, by telephone at (202) 408-2876 or by electronic mail at                         *williss@fhfb.gov*.                     

Dated: December 9, 2004.

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Mark J. Tenhundfeld,

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 04-27403 Filed 12-9-04; 5:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT TO
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,666)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,775
<PP&E>                                          30,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,889
<SALES>                                         52,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,548
<CGS>                                           35,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,734
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
§ 270.11a-1 Definition of “exchange” for purposes of section 11 of the Act. ( a ) For the purposes of section 11 of the Act, the term *exchange* as used therein shall include the issuance of any security by a registered investment company in an amount equal to the proceeds, or any portion of the proceeds, paid or payable— ( 1 ) Upon the repurchase, by or at the instance of such issuer, of an outstanding security the terms of which provide for its termination, retirement or cancellation, or
( 2 ) Upon the termination, retirement or cancellation of an outstanding security of such issuer in accordance with the terms thereof.
( b ) A security shall not be deemed to have been repurchased by or at the instance of the issuer, or terminated, retired or canceled in accordance with the terms of the security if— ( 1 ) The security was redeemed or repurchased at the instance of the holder; or
( 2 ) A security holder's account was closed for failure to make payments as prescribed in the security or instruments pursuant to which the security was issued, and notice of intention to close the account was mailed to the security holder, and he had a reasonable time in which to meet the deficiency; or
( 3 ) Sale of the security was restricted to a specified, limited group of persons and, in accordance with the terms of the security or the instruments pursuant to which the security was issued, upon its being transferred by the holder to a person not a member of the group eligible to purchase the security, the issuer required the surrender of the security and paid the redemption price thereof.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply if, following the repurchase of an outstanding security by or at the instance of the issuer or the termination, retirement or cancellation of an outstanding security in accordance with the terms thereof— ( 1 ) The proceeds are actually paid to the security holder by or on behalf of the issuer within 7 days, and
( 2 ) No sale and no offer (other than by way of exchange) of any security of the issuer is made by or on behalf of the issuer to the person to whom such proceeds were paid, within 60 days after such payment.
( d ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to the repurchase, termination, retirement, or cancellation of a security outstanding on the effective date of this section or issued pursuant to a subscription agreement or other plan of acquisition in effect on such date.
(Sec. 11, 54 Stat. 808; 15 U.S.C. 80a-11)
[32 FR 10728, July 21, 1967]
§ 224.7 Complaint. ( a ) On or after the date the Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), the reviewing official may serve a complaint on the defendant, as provided in § 224.8.
( b ) The complaint shall state: ( 1 ) Allegations of liability against the defendant, including the statutory basis for liability, an identification of the claims or statements that are the basis for the alleged liability, and the reasons why liability allegedly arises from such claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) Instructions for filing an answer to request a hearing, including a specific statement of the defendant's right to request a hearing by filing an answer and to be represented by a representative; and
( 4 ) That failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in the imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessments without right to appeal, as provided in § 224.10.
( c ) At the same time the reviewing official serves the complaint, he or she shall serve the defendant with a copy of these regulations.
### §15941. Great Lakes oil and gas drilling ban

No Federal or State permit or lease shall be issued for new oil and gas slant, directional, or offshore drilling in or under one or more of the Great Lakes.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §386, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 744.)
#### § 5.24 Applicability of other parts of this chapter

Insofar as it is consistent with the requirements of this part, all other provisions of this chapter that apply to a person shall apply to such person as though such provisions were expressly set forth in this part.
§ 120.15 Exemptions. ( a ) Persons otherwise required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls in accordance with this subchapter must do so prior to utilization of an exemption.
( b ) Exemptions provided in this subchapter may not be utilized for transactions in which the exporter, any party to the export, any source or manufacturer, broker or other participant in the brokering activities, is generally ineligible as set forth in § 120.16, unless prior written authorization has been granted by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
( c ) Exemptions provided in this subchapter do not apply with respect to defense articles or defense services originating in or for export to any proscribed countries, areas, or persons identified in § 126.1 of this subchapter, except as provided in § 126.1.
( d ) Each exemption provided in this subchapter is subject to limitation as described in the section or paragraph of this subchapter in which the exemption is prescribed.
( e ) Any person engaging in any export, reexport, transfer, or retransfer of a defense article or defense service pursuant to an exemption must maintain records of each such export, reexport, transfer, or retransfer. The records shall, to the extent applicable to the transaction and consistent with the requirements of § 123.22 of this subchapter, include the following information: A description of the defense article, including technical data, or defense service; the name and address of the end-user and other available contact information (e.g., telephone number and electronic mail address); the name of the natural person responsible for the transaction; the stated end-use of the defense article or defense service; the date of the transaction; the Electronic Export Information (EEI) Internal Transaction Number (ITN); and the method of transmission. The person using or acting in reliance upon the exemption shall also comply with any additional recordkeeping requirements enumerated in the text of the regulations concerning such exemption (e.g., requirements specific to the Defense Trade Cooperation Treaties in §§ 126.16 and 126.17 of this subchapter).
( f ) To claim an exemption for the export of technical data under the provisions of this subchapter (e.g., §§ 125.4 and 125.5 of this subchapter), the exporter must certify that the proposed export is covered by a relevant section of this subchapter, to include the paragraph and applicable subordinate paragraph. Certifications consist of clearly marking the package or letter containing the technical data “22 CFR [insert ITAR exemption] applicable.” This certification must be made in written form and retained in the exporter's files for a period of 5 years. For exports that are oral, visual, or electronic the exporter must also complete a written certification and retain it for a period of 5 years.
#### John Berger, Respondent, v. James M. Leonard et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Leonard appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 10, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment striking out said defendants’ answer, directing an assessment of damages against them, and severing the action against the defendant Jamaica Hospital; and (2) from a resetttled order of the same court, entered March 24, 1960, which makes the same dispositions. Resettled order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after trial. Appeal from the original order entered February 10, 1960, dismissed, without costs. Such appeal has been rendered academic by the appeal from the resettled order. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF T/F PURIFINER,  INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 , AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           118,790 
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    166,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                      10,000
<INVENTORY>                                      272,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 588,947 
<PP&E>                                           260,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                   113,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,321,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,172,692     
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           1,520     
<OTHER-SE>                                      (332,045)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,321,140
<SALES>                                        1,219,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,219,825
<CGS>                                            694,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    694,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,141,729                                      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                24,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (641,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (641,287) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (641,287)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.50)  

        

</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiffs have filed administrative motions regarding whether to file under seal portions

of their submissions in support of their motion to amend the case schedule (Dkt. No. 299), motion

to compel production (Dkt. No. 354) and reply in support of motion to compel (Dkt. No. 365). 

Information in these submissions was designated as “confidential” by defendants. Defendants

have not objected to plaintiffs’ motion to unseal these documents on the grounds that they do not

in fact contain confidential information. Plaintiffs’ motion is therefore GRANTED. This

information shall therefore be made part of the public record and plaintiffs shall file the

documents in question without redactions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 370 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 1103.141-1103.148 [Reserved]
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation



I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation,
state:



A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the
period from November 2, 2020 through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s
performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 24, 2019 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables
LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere
Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.





|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | John Deere Capital Corporation
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|                       |     |                               
|                       |     |                               
|                       | By: | /s/ Katrin Watkins            
|                       |     | Katrin Watkins                
|                       |     | Assistant Secretary