alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §13572. Authorization of program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a program of financial assistance to—

(1) facilitate the production and generation of coal-based power, through the deployment of clean coal electric generating equipment and processes that, compared to equipment or processes that are in operation on a full scale—

(A) improve—

(i) energy efficiency; or

(ii) environmental performance consistent with relevant Federal and State clean air requirements, including those promulgated under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); and

(B) are not yet cost competitive; and

(2) facilitate the utilization of existing coal-based electricity generation plants through projects that—

(A) deploy advanced air pollution control equipment and processes; and

(B) are designed to voluntarily enhance environmental performance above current applicable obligations under the Clean Air Act and State implementation efforts pursuant to such Act.

#### (b) Financial criteria

As determined by the Secretary for a particular project, financial assistance under this subchapter shall be in the form of—

(1) cost-sharing of an appropriate percentage of the total project cost, not to exceed 50 percent as calculated under section 16352 of this title; or

(2) financial assistance, including grants, cooperative agreements, or loans as authorized under this Act or other statutory authority of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXXI, §3102, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §421(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 757.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Clean Air Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A)(ii), (2)(B), is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, which is classified generally to chapter 85 (§7401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of this title and Tables.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 102–486, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2776, known as the Energy Policy Act of 1992. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 13201 of this title and Tables.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 19, 2008





*/s/
                George Morris*George
                MorrisChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Exhibit
        32.2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL J. MADRY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1890

[ November 30, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 80

- 9092CF10A

.

Michael J. Madry, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOOR GIAN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SCWC

- 20

- 0000 689

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I,

Respondent /Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

CHANSE HIRATA

, Petitioner /Defendant

- Appellant,

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 20

- 0000 689 ; CASE NO. 1FFC

- 18

- 0000756 )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins

, JJ.)

Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appell ant Chanse Hirata ’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on February 8, 2022 , is

accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, March 2 3 , 202 2

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000689

23-MAR-2022

09:01 AM

Dkt. 3 OGAC
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Rodriguez, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Geoffrey Rodriguez, Appellant.

*171[716 NYS2d 570]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered September 14, 1998, convicting defendant David Rodriguez, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of from 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed. Judgment, same court and Justice, rendered September 9, 1998, convicting defendant Geoffrey Rodriguez, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree (two counts), conspiracy in the first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him to four consecutive terms of 25 years to life and a concurrent term of 8Vs to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

As to both defendants, the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established the active participation by defendant Geoffrey Rodriguez in the two murders of which he was convicted, the existence of a single conspiracy including multiple drug-selling operations *(see, People v Leisner,*73 NY2d 140, 149-151; *People v De Los Angeles,*270 AD2d 196, 197), and the roles played by each defendant in the conspiracy.

According “ ‘great deference’ ” *(People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350, 356, *affd*500 US 352) to the court’s findings with respect to pretextuality, we conclude that the court’s rulings on the applications made by the People and defendants pursuant to *Batson v Kentucky*(476 US 79) are supported by the record.

The court’s conspiracy charge, read as a'whole, was sufficiently balanced and conveyed the proper standards concerning single and multiple conspiracies *(see, People v De Los Angeles, supra).*

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

Defendants’ remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
#### § 150.3 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, it is the Department of State's intention that the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
### §2321. Lots; establishment of boundaries

The Commission is authorized to plat each community immediately upon passage of this chapter, or immediately upon the inclusion of the community within the provisions of this chapter. The Commission may establish lot boundaries, and realine, divide, or enlarge existing tracts as it deems appropriate.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 3, §31, 69 Stat. 474.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
523
-— |
r 521
3
520

0 20 40 80 120 160 200
OO
Kilometers
([) Pronghorn CIAA 0 1020 40 60 80 100
|
(414) Pronghorn Herd Areas Miles

[Rawlins RMPPA

Map 4-6
Pronghorn
Cumulative Impact Analysis Area

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
#### Elias Tittler, Appellant, v. Harry A. La Burt, Individually and as Director of Creedmoor State Hospital, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 16, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
# Uradni list L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 199 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 617. avgust 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 199

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 617. avgust 2018

---

| Vsebina | | II   Nezakonodajni akti | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI |
| | * | Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Norveško o upravnem sodelovanju, boju proti goljufijam in izterjavi terjatev na področju davka na dodano vrednost | 1 |

Vsebina

II   Nezakonodajni akti

Stran

MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI

*

Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Norveško o upravnem sodelovanju, boju proti goljufijam in izterjavi terjatev na področju davka na dodano vrednost

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

II Nezakonodajni akti

MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI

| 7.8.2018 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 199/1

---

Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Norveško o upravnem sodelovanju, boju proti goljufijam in izterjavi terjatev na področju davka na dodano vrednost

Po podpisu 6. februarja 2018 sta Evropska unija in Kraljevina Norveška druga drugo (9. julija 2018 oziroma 26. junija 2018) uradno obvestili o zaključku notranjih pravnih postopkov iz člena 44(1) Sporazuma (1).

1

Sporazum začne veljati 1. septembra 2018 na podlagi člena 44(2) Sporazuma.

---

(1)  Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Norveško o upravnem sodelovanju, boju proti goljufijam in izterjavi terjatev na področju davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 195, 1.8.2018, str. 3).

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL DEFS.’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 17200 CLAIM

MASTER FILE NO.: C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2837012

DARRYL P. RAINS (CA SBN 104802) 

EUGENE ILLOVSKY (CA SBN 117892)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

Facsimile: 650.494.0792

Email: DRains@mofo.com 

CRAIG D. MARTIN (CA SBN 168195)

DOROTHY L. FERNANDEZ (CA SBN 184266)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for defendants The Charles Schwab Corporation, 

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Investment 

Management, Inc., Schwab Investments, Charles R. Schwab, 

Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, Matthew 

Hastings, Mariann Byerwalter, Donald F. Dorward, William A. 

Hasler, Robert G. Holmes, Gerald B. Smith, Donald R. 

Stephens, and Michael W. Wilsey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CHARLES SCHWAB CORP. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Master File No. C-08-01510-WHA

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 

17200 CLAIM

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 750 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL DEFS.’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 17200 CLAIM 

MASTER FILE NO.: C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2837012

1

Defendants Charles R. Schwab, Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, and 

Matthew Hastings (the “Individual Defendants”) have moved the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 56, to grant them summary judgment on Count IV of plaintiffs’ Second 

Consolidated Amended Complaint, for violation of section 17200 of California Business &

Professions Code. Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion. Having considered the papers filed in connection with their Motion, the Court hereby 

GRANTS the Individual Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count IV, for 

violations of section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2010

 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

The hearing on Monday, May 10, 2010, at 7:30 a.m. is Vacated.

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 750 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 239.6 Transferability of Guarantee; Note Register.

A Noteholder may assign, transfer or pledge an Eligible Note to any Person, provided that such transfer is permitted under applicable law and regulation, including, without limitation, the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) regulations. Any such assignment, transfer or pledge shall be effective on the date that the name of the new Noteholder is entered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement. USAID shall be entitled to treat the Persons in whose names the Eligible Notes are registered as the owners thereof for all purposes of the Guarantee, and USAID shall not be affected by notice to the contrary.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11

ALLIN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                            Three Months        Three Months
                                                               Ended               Ended
                                                             March 31,           March 31,
                                                                1996                1997
                                                           --------------      --------------
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>  
Net loss                                                   $        (900)      $      (2,592)
Accretion and dividends on preferred stock                           ---                  64
                                                           --------------      --------------
Net loss attributable to common shareholders               $        (900)      $      (2,656)
                                                           ==============      ==============
Net loss per common share                                  $       (0.35)      $       (0.51)
                                                           ==============      ==============
Weighted average common and common equivalent              
  shares outstanding during the period (1)                     2,400,000           5,184,067

Effect of conversion of preferred stock
  issued within one year of the offering                         203,385                 ---
                                                           --------------      --------------
Shares used in calculating net loss per common
  share                                                        2,603,385           5,184,067
                                                           ==============      ==============
</TABLE> 

(1) The weighted average common shares outstanding has been retroactively
    restated for the effect of the 2,400 for 1 stock split which occurred in
    October 1996.
Editorial Note on Part 202
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 202 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 202.2 Shipments eligible for reimbursement of freight charges. ( a ) In order to further the efficient use of United States voluntary contributions for development, relief, and rehabilitation in nations or areas designated by the Administrator of AID from time to time, agencies may be reimbursed by AID within specified limitations for freight charges incurred and paid in transporting supplies donated to or purchased by such agencies from United States ports or, in the case of excess or surplus property supplied by the United States, from foreign ports to ports of entry in the recipient country or to points of entry in the recipient country in cases ( 1 ) of landlocked countries,
( 2 ) where ports cannot be used effectively because of natural or other disturbances,
( 3 ) where carriers to a specified country are unavailable, or
( 4 ) where a substantial savings in costs or time can be effected by the utilization of points of entry other than ports.
( b ) Shipments shall be eligible for reimbursement of freight charges only as authorized by the issuance by AID of a Procurement Authorization (Form AID 1160-4).
( c ) The Office of Commodity Management, Bureau for Program and Management Services, AID, shall be responsible for determining when carriers are “unavailable.”
Exhibit 32



Certification



Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                | 
|August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach   
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §300d–46. Definition

In this part, the term "uncompensated care costs" means unreimbursed costs from serving self-pay, charity, or Medicaid patients, without regard to payment under section 1396r–4 of this title, all of which are attributable to emergency care and trauma care, including costs related to subsequent inpatient admissions to the hospital.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XII, §1246, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3505(a)(6), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 525.)
#### Mabel H. Myers, Respondent, v. Herbert Taylor, Appellant.

Order reversed and motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Present Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
§ 50.25 Clearing requirement compliance schedule. ( a ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this paragraph: *Active fund* means any private fund as defined in section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, that is not a third-party subaccount and that executes 200 or more swaps per month based on a monthly average over the 12 months preceding the Commission issuing a clearing requirement determination under section 2(h)(2) of the Act.
*Category 1 Entity* means a swap dealer, a security-based swap dealer; a major swap participant; a major security-based swap participant; or an active fund.
*Category 2 Entity* means a commodity pool; a private fund as defined in section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 other than an active fund; or a person predominantly engaged in activities that are in the business of banking, or in activities that are financial in nature as defined in section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, provided that, in each case, the entity is not a third-party subaccount.
*Third-party Subaccount* means an account that is managed by an investment manager that is independent of and unaffiliated with the account's beneficial owner or sponsor, and is responsible for the documentation necessary for the account's beneficial owner to clear swaps.
( b ) Upon issuing a clearing requirement determination under section 2(h)(2) of the Act, the Commission may determine, based on the group, category, type, or class of swaps subject to such determination, that the following schedule for compliance with the requirements of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act shall apply: ( 1 ) A swap between a Category 1 Entity and another Category 1 Entity, or any other entity that desires to clear the transaction, must comply with the requirements of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act no later than ninety (90) days from the date of publication of such clearing requirement determination in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) A swap between a Category 2 Entity and a Category 1 Entity, another Category 2 Entity, or any other entity that desires to clear the transaction, must comply with the requirements of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act no later than one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of publication of such clearing requirement determination in the Federal Register.
( 3 ) All other swaps for which neither of the parties to the swap is eligible to claim the exception from the clearing requirement set forth in section 2(h)(7) of the Act and § 39.6, must comply with the requirements of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act no later than two hundred and seventy (270) days from the date of publication of such clearing requirement determination in the Federal Register.
( c ) Nothing in this rule shall be construed to prohibit any person from voluntarily complying with the requirements of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act sooner than the implementation schedule provided under paragraph (b).
[77 FR 44455, July 30, 2012]