alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
04/0G/2011 15:44 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

AKK. b. T^]] 11;34AM REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

Express 

+ DMS 

RTWEMTOF 

SPORIATION 

! •-"! A ^: Cb 

12002/008 

NO. 05? P. 2 

Lsgal Depanmeni 

3620 H«elis Crow ftoBd 

Memphis, TN 58125 

Tel«ohan«90i.^3.i,gfl00 

April 6, 2011 

VIA FEDEX & FACSIMILE 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 205?1 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 

R£: In the Matter of Empire Airlines, Inc. 

F A A Docket No- CP09NM0009 

Please find enclosed a Notice of Appeal being filed by Empire Airlines in connection 

with the above-referenced matter. 

Copies of this Notice are also being saved on the Honorable Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

and the FA A Office of Regional Counsel - Northwest Mountain Region. 

Very truly yours, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

U U^V^ ^ . (^fcf^..^ 

Courtney E. Felts V 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory Affairs 

(901) 434-8632 

(901)434-8283 FAX 

Enclosure 

cc: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Department of Traxisportation 

Mr, Scott R. Morris, FAA Office of Regional Counsel - Northwest Mountain Region 
04/0G/2011 15;44 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 121003/008 

MrK, b.lijl ] ]l:ii4A M REGULATORY AFFAIRS MO. 05? P. 3 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHrNTGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Empire Airlines, Inc., 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM0009 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0586 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233, Respondent, by and tluough undersigned counsel, 

hereby submits this Notice of its intent to appeal the Tninal T^ecision of Administrative 

Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin, served March 28,2011. 

Dated this 6^ day of April, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Courtney' tney B. . Felts 

Senior Attorney - Regulatory Affairs 

Federal Express Corporation 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3'" Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

(901) 434-8632 

(901) 434-8283 FAX 

Attorneys for Respondent, 

Empire Airlines, Inc. 
04/06/2011 15:44 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 0004/00 8 

MrK. D.iui l \\-/5 m KtGULAlORV AFFAIRS ^0,05 7 P. 4 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was forwarded via facsimile copy o] 

and FedEx Overnight delivery on the 6^^^^*^ day of April, 2011, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

FAX: (202) 493-5142 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Deparmjent of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Mr. Scott R. Morris, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel -Northwest Mountain Region 

1601 Lind Avenue SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

FAX: (425)227-1007 

Courtney E. JFelts
tl~~Oil ~~ ~~CIXilH. 

el- e 0 £ D~ cl 2~ ~ 61- M~ .JJ. 0 IL~ ~A~ '§J 0 £ CH 111 o~ 1'11 H. 

~~ [~clL~ ~A~ [~cl~~ ~.JJ. ~~OIL~ ~A~ '§JOilAl @~ ~2.o~AilH. 

J ~Cl 11, 1il~ 

I 

FEMA 529K 9/2014
Case 3:08-cv-01485-EMC Document 61 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 1 Case3:08-cv-01485-MHP Document59 Filed01/15/10 Page1 of 1
### §§2761, 2762. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of Part D of this subchapter by Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 688.

Section 2761, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §131, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 516; Pub. L. 89–253, §30(a), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 978; Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §441(7), Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1250; Pub. L. 89–794, title I, §113(2), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1455, provided for establishment of special impact programs and the grants, criteria, and procedures to be used in carrying them out.

Section 2762, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §132, as added Pub. L. 89–794, title I, §113(2), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1456, placed a limitation on Federal share of cost of special impact programs.
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: June 30,2003

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    The Continental Corporation
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago,IL 60685


13F File Number:  28-172

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
August 13,2003
Chicago, Illinois,60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which The Continental Corporation exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of The Continental Corporation.
<Page>
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-1184 SI 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BURNHAM BROWN

Robert M. Bodzin, State Bar No. 201327 

P.O. Box 119 

Oakland, CA 94604 

Telephone: (510) 835-6833 

Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 

rbodzin@BurnhamBrown.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION 

WILLIAM HELM, DEBORAH PRISE, 

HEATHER P. RADY, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other employees and former 

employees similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CV 08-1184-SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:08-cv-01184-SI Document 247 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-1184 SI 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AND NOW this ____day of May, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Request for Case 

Management Conference, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is set for a Case Management 

Conference on __________________________________ at 3:00 p.m. 

Dated: 

 Honorable Susan Illston 

 United States District Court 

6/4/10

Case 3:08-cv-01184-SI Document 247 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2
### §273b. Report on the long-term health effects of living organ donation

Not later than 1 year after December 21, 2007, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that details the progress made towards understanding the long-term health effects of living organ donation.

(Pub. L. 110–144, §3, Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Charlie W. Norwood Living Organ Donation Act, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 1104.12 Custody of archaeological resources. ( a ) Archaeological resources excavated or removed from the public lands remain the property of the United States.
( b ) The Commissioner may provide for the exchange of archaeological resources among suitable universities, museums, or other scientific or educational institutions, when such resources have been excavated or removed from public lands under the authority of a permit issued by the Commissioner.
§ 22.5 Remittances to Foreign Service posts. Remittances to Foreign Service posts from persons in the United States in payment of offical fees and charges or for the purpose of establishing deposits in advance of rendition of services shall be in a form acceptable to the post, drawn payable to the American Embassy (name of city), American Consulate General (name of city) or American Consulate (name of city), as the case may be. This will permit cashing of negotiable instruments for deposit in the Treasury when not negotiated locally. See § 23.2 of this chapter. ( a ) *Time at which fees become payable.* Fees are due and payble prior to issue or delivery to the interested party of a signed document, a copy of a record, or other paper representative of a service performed.
( b ) *Receipt for fees; register of services.* Every officer of the Foreign Service responsible for the performance of services as enumerated in the Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Foreign Service (§ 22.1), shall give receipts for fees collected for the official services rendered, specifying the nature of the service and numbered to correspond with entries in a register maintained for the purpose (22 U.S.C. 1192, 1193, and 1194). The register serves as a record of official acts performed by officers of the Foreign Service in a governmental or notarial capacity, corresponding in this regard with the record which notaries are usually expected or required to keep of their official acts. See § 92.2 of this chapter.
( c ) *Deposits to guarantee payment of fees or incidental costs.* When the amount of any fee is determinable only after initiation of the performance of a service, or if incidental costs are involved, the total fee and incidental costs shall be carefully estimated and an advance deposit required, subject to refund of any unused balance to the person making the deposit.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

HANS KARL ASHBAUCHER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF ARCATA, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. CV 08-2840 MHP/NJV

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on March 17, 2010, I served a true and correct copy of

the Court's March 17, 2010 Order granting the parties' stipulation to the filing of a second amended

complaint by Plaintiffs Ashbaucher, Starr and Miller, and the dismissal of their claims against

numerous defendants, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)

listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.

Kristofer Johnson Michelle Hernandez

2100 Western Avenue P.O. Box 896

Arcata, CA 95521 Arcata, CA 95518

Dated: March 17, 2010

 Chris Wolpert

Administrative Law Clerk to the 

Honorable Nandor J. Vadas

Case 3:08-cv-02840-EMC Document 139 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1506.3 Do these regulations adopt the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS)?

This part adopts and incorporates all provisions of the FCCS. Except as otherwise provided by law, USADF will conduct administrative actions to collect claims (including offset, compromise, suspension termination, disclosure, and referral) in accordance with the FCCS.
Opinion filed March 5, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-15-00012-CR

___________

MICHAEL ROBERT GAVURNIK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 25262A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Michael Robert Gavurnik, Appellant, filed a pro se notice of appeal in this 

case. Appellant has now filed a pro se motion to dismiss the appeal. In the 

motion, Appellant states, “[I] do not wish to appeal my case or sentence[.] Please 

let me get on to TDCJ.” Appellant requests that his appeal be withdrawn. The

motion is signed by Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

March 5, 2015 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Amendment 1 to Award Agreement - executive officers & US employees



  
 Exhibit 10.16

 Employees in US 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 to 

RESTRICTED AWARD AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to that certain Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated             ,
20     (“Agreement”), by and between SemGroup Corporation, a Delaware corporation (with any successor, the “Company”), and
             (the “Participant”). 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Company granted certain Shares to the Participant; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 of the Agreement, during the Restriction Period, Participant is not entitled to exercise the
rights of a Stockholder of the Company, except for the right to receive certain Dividends, all as more fully described in such Section 5; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement to permit the Participant to exercise the voting rights of a Stockholder of the Company during the Restriction Period; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Agreement as follows: 

1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement unless otherwise
defined herein. 
 2. Authority of Company to Amend. This Amendment is adopted and approved by the Company without the
consent of the Participant under the authority granted pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement. 
 3. Amendment to
Section 5 of Agreement. Section 5 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 5. Rights as a Stockholder. During the Restriction Period, the Participant shall have none of the rights of a Stockholder of the Company, except that the Participant shall: (a) be entitled to
exercise all of the voting rights of a Stockholder of the Company, and (b) have the right to receive dividends on the Restricted Shares (the “Dividends”) subject to the remainder of this Section 5. The Dividends, if
any, shall be held by the Company and shall be subject to forfeiture until such time that the Restricted Shares on which the Dividends were distributed vest in accordance with Section 3 above. The Dividends shall be








 
released to the Participant, subject to Section 10 hereof, as soon as administratively practicable, but not later than the time of delivery to the Participant, in accordance with
Section 2 above, of certificates representing the Restricted Shares on which the Dividends were distributed. 
 4.
Continuation of Agreement. Except as specifically stated herein, this Amendment does not change the terms and conditions of the Agreement which remains in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	SemGroup Corporation
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:
	Title:
#### § 224.42 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the A.I.D. Administrator imposing penalties or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.32 Suppliers of delivery services. ( a ) *Performance of the service contract.* The supplier of delivery services financed by USAID shall comply with the terms and conditions of its contract to supply delivery services.
( b ) *Adjustment in the price of delivery services.* The supplier of delivery services shall pay to the Office of Financial Management, USAID, Washington, DC 20523-7792, all adjustments in the purchase price in favor of the importer (or person purchasing the ocean transportation services) arising out of the terms of the contract or the customs of the trade. Any such payment shall be accompanied by a statement explaining the adjustment and shall specify the name and address of the importer or other person for whom the adjustment is made, the date and amount of the original invoice, and the identification number of the implementing document, if known, under which the original transaction was financed.
( c ) *Marine insurance reporting requirement.* With respect to any loss payment exceeding $10,000 in value which a supplier of marine insurance makes under a marine insurance policy financed pursuant to this part, the supplier of marine insurance shall, within 15 days of making such payment, report to the Commodity Support Division, Office of Procurement, USAID, Washington, DC 20523-7900, the amount and date of the payment, a description of the commodity, the USAID identification number, name of the carrier, vessel, and voyage number (alternatively, flight or inland carrier run number), date of the bill(s) of lading, the identity and address of the assured, and the identity and address of the assignee of the assured to whom payment has actually been made.
[55 FR 34232, Aug. 22, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 17535, Apr. 12, 1999]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAWN CURTIS,

Appellant,

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00206-CV

Appeal from the

14th District Court

v.

AGF SPRING CREEK/COIT II, LTD., 

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# DC-10-04499-A)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant, Dawn Curtis, to dismiss the 

appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Costs 

of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

August 27, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States’ Motion to Order Discovery

CR-08-00208-01 MAG

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

WADE M. RHYNE (CABN 216799)

Assistant United States Attorney

MATTHEW DELLABETTA

Law Clerk

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 637-3737

Fax: (510) 637-3724

E-Mail: matthew.dellabetta@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

VANESSA McKNIGHT,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-08-00208-01 MAG

UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO

ORDER DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

On April 27, 2010, the parties initially appeared before the Court regarding the 

Defendant’s violation of probation. Defense counsel requested, and the Court ordered, that the

matter be continued to June 10, 2010 to allow defense counsel time to negotiate a resolution of

the matter and to conduct discovery. The United States respectfully requests the Court to issue

an order allowing the United States Probation Office to disclose discovery to the parties. This

includes evidence of the Defendant’s restitution payment history and the Report of Investigation 

///

///

Case 3:08-cr-00208-LB Document 32 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States’ Motion to Order Discovery

CR-08-00208-01 MAG -2-

from the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office regarding the Defendant’s pending welfare

fraud case. Counsel for the Defendant does not oppose this motion.

DATED: May 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

_____________/s/_____________

WADE M. RHYNE

Assistant United States Attorney

MATTHEW DELLABETTA

Law Clerk

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The United States Probation Office is hereby ordered to disclose to the parties discovery 

relating to the allegations in the current case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 28, 2010 ___________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cr-00208-LB Document 32 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of
Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                   |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                   |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
Editorial Note on Part 217
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 217.46 Financial and employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Provision of financial assistance.* ( 1 ) In providing financial assistance to qualified handicapped persons, a recipient to which this subpart applies may not (i), on the basis of handicap, provide less assistance than is provided to nonhandicapped persons, limit eligibility for assistance, or otherwise discriminate or (ii) assist any entity or person that provides assistance to any of the recipient's students in a manner that discriminates against qualified handicapped persons on the basis of handicap.
( 2 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established under wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments that require awards to be made on the basis of factors that discriminate or have the effect of discriminating on the basis of handicap only if the overall effect of the award of scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance is not discriminatory on the basis of handicap.
( b ) *Assistance in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in providing employment opportunities to any of its students shall assure itself that such employment opportunities, as a whole, are made available in a manner that would not violate subpart B if they were provided by the recipient.
( c ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students may not do so in a manner that violates subpart B.