alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
unaudited financial statements for the three months ending March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                   USDOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      10,431,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,078,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,277,752
<PP&E>                                      34,210,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,953,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,249,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        105
<COMMON>                                       118,809
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,172,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,953,019
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,535,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,635,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (458,422)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (312,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (312,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (272,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.46 Compensation to supplier if shipment is prohibited. ( a ) *Payment to supplier.* USAID shall make appropriate payment to a supplier for the value of USAID-financed commodities available for immediate shipment from the United States if all the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) Shipment is prohibited by order of the U.S. Government and such order has general application to all shipments to the cooperating country.
( 2 ) Payment may not be made by the bank under the terms of the letter of credit or payment instructions.
( 3 ) The supplier is unable to dispose of the commodities without loss.
( 4 ) The supplier tenders to USAID a negotiable warehouse receipt covering the commodities in question and presents to USAID such other documentation required by § 201.52 as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
( b ) *Other settlement.* In lieu of accepting title to the commodities, USAID may negotiate with the supplier such other settlement as may be fair and equitable under the circumstances.
### §1862o–6. Research on innovation and inventiveness

In carrying out its research programs on science policy and on the science of learning, the Foundation may support research on the process of innovation and the teaching of inventiveness.

(Pub. L. 110–69, title VII, §7019, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Act, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 7001 of Pub. L. 110–69, set out as a note under section 1862o of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 431 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 431

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2011

    Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Jordan, and Mr. Nugent) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE PART

OF PROFESSOR JAMES’

TESTIMONY

With respect to the motion to exclude the “negative causation” analysis of Professor

Christopher M. James, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing it for the final

pretrial conference. The Court will not allow any expert opinion that is based on a loss-causation

theory contrary to the order filed today on that issue. Please read the order and re-do the motion

in conformity therewith. Please do not waste time over mere arguments over the meaning of the

overall evidence where the jury could go either way. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02984-WHA Document 29 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,134
<SECURITIES>                                   282,937
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,565
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,075,245
<PP&E>                                       1,387,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                 761,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,040,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          459,754
<BONDS>                                        317,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,311
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,045,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,040,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               638,107
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  471,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
J,,ISO STq~.FSyu

\\~// Q

r 0 PROI UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C
. 20460 

# JAN - 5 2011~

OFFICE OF AIRAND RADIATION Mr
. Matthew

Todd American PetroleumInstitute 1220 L Street, NW Washington, D

.C
. 20005-4070 

### Dear Mr . Todd: The U .S
. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received the Petition for Reconsideration of the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE) you submitted on October 19, 2010
. This letter is to informyou that we intend to initiate a reconsideration process to address the first, second, and third issues raised in that petition
. We are not taking action at this time on the fourth issue raised in your petition
. We received a total ofsix petitions for reconsideration of the August 20, 2010 final NESHAP for stationary RICE
. We are granting reconsideration on the following issues raised in the petitions: " continuous parametric monitoring systemrequirements; " emission standard for existing four-stroke lean burn spark ignition engines; " methodology for considering emissions variability and establishing the floor for the maximum

achievable control technology; " use of co-benefits of non-hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions reductions when determining maximum achievable control technologies and generally available control technologies; " use oftotal hydrocarbons rather than formaldehyde as a surrogate for HAPemissions; and " allowance for emergency engines to operate up to 15 hours per year as part of an emergency demand response program . At this time, we are not taking action of the following issues raised in the petitions: " provisions prohibiting use of emergency engines for peak shaving operation; " EPA's decision not to distinguish between engines located in urban and rural areas in establishing emission standards ; and " EPA's decision not to have separate standards that would apply during periods of shutdown and malfunction
.

Internet Address (URL) " http://www .epa .gov Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperThe reconsideration process will allow for public participation on the issues raised under reconsideration. Amore detailed description of the particular issues to be reconsidered and specific information about the process to be followed will be set out in a forthcoming Federal Register notice
. If you have any questions regarding the reconsideration process, please contact Melanie King of my staffat (919) 541-2469
. We thank you for your continuing interest inthis rule and look forward to hearing from you during the reconsideration process.
#### § 450.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this subchapter:

(a) *Appropriate regulatory agency* has the meaning set out in section 3(a)(34)(G) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(34)(G)), except that the appropriate regulatory agency for—

(1) A Federal credit union as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1752(1) and an insured credit union as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1752(7) is the National Credit Union Administration; and

(2) Any depository institution for whom an appropriate regulatory agency is not explicitly specified by either section 3(a)(34)(G) or this paragraph, is the SEC;

(b) *Customer* includes, but is not limited to, the counterparty to a transaction pursuant to a repurchase agreement for whom the depository institution retains possession of the security sold subject to repurchase, but does not include a broker or dealer that is registered pursuant to section 15, 15B or 15C(a)(1)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o, 78o-4, 78o-5(a)(l)(A)) or that has filed notice of its status as a government securities broker or dealer pursuant to section 15C(a)(1)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-5(a)(1)(B)) except as provided in § 450.4.

(c) *Depository institution* has the meaning stated in clauses (i) through (vi) of section 19(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461(b)(1)(A) (i)-(vi)) and also includes a foreign bank, an agency or branch of a foreign bank and a commercial lending company owned or controlled by a foreign bank (as such terms are defined in the International Banking Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-369, 92 Stat. 607);

(d) *Fiduciary capacity* includes trustee, executor, administrator, registrar, transfer agent, guardian, assignee, receiver, managing agent, and any other similar capacity involving the sole or shared exercise of discretion by a depository institution having fiduciary powers that is supervised by a Federal or state financial institution regulatory agency; and

(e) *Government securities* means:

| If . . . | Then . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1)(i) A depository institution is a government securities broker or dealer as defined in sections 3(a)(43) and 3(a)(44) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(43)-(44)) | “Government securities” means those obligations described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), or (E) of section 3(a)(42) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(42)(A)-(C), (E)) |
| (ii) A depository institution is exempt under Part 401 of this chapter from the requirements of Subchapter A | “Government securities” means those obligations described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), or (E) of section 3(a)(42) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(42)(A)-(C), (E)) |
| (2) A depository institution is not a government securities broker or dealer as defined in sections 3(a)(43) and 3(a)(44) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(43)-(44)) | “Government securities” means those obligations described in subparagraphs (A), (B), or (C) of section 3(a)(42) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(42)(A)-(C)) |

[52 FR 27957, July 24, 1987, as amended at 55 FR 6604, Feb. 26, 1990; 66 FR 28655, May 24, 2001; 66 FR 29888, June 1, 2001]
#### § 1008.301 [Reserved]
# FILED August 19, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE RONALD COLLIER, ) ) Davidson Chancery Plaintiff/Appellant, ) No. 97-160-II ) VS. ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9709-CH-00502 TENNESSEE DEPARTMEN T OF ) CORRECTIONS, et. al., ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )



## O R D E R On August 5, 1998, the Clerk of this Court received a “Memorandum of Law, Facts and Exhibits in Support of

Petition for Rehearing,” apparently referring to the opinion filed by this Courton July 22, 1998. The Clerk has no record of the receipt of a

petition to rehea

r in this case.
Said memorandum has be

en considered a

s a petition to rehear, althoughnot timely filed. Said memorandum states no valid ground for altering the opinion of the Court. A rehearing is therefore denied. ENTER ________________

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDL E SECTION

___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

____________________________________ WILLIA M C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
### §300a. Formula grants to States for family planning services

#### (a) Authority of Secretary; prerequisites

The Secretary is authorized to make grants, from allotments made under subsection (b), to State health authorities to assist in planning, establishing, maintaining, coordinating, and evaluating family planning services. No grant may be made to a State health authority under this section unless such authority has submitted, and had approved by the Secretary, a State plan for a coordinated and comprehensive program of family planning services.

#### (b) Factors determining amount of State allotments

The sums appropriated to carry out the provisions of this section shall be allotted to the States by the Secretary on the basis of the population and the financial need of the respective States.

#### (c) "State" defined

For the purposes of this section, the term "State" includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of making grants under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971; $15,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972; and $20,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1973.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title X, §1002, as added Pub. L. 91–572, §6(c), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; amended Pub. L. 94–484, title IX, §905(b)(1), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2325.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 94–484 defined "State" to include Northern Mariana Islands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study of State Delivery of Services; Report to Congress

Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §931(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 570, directed Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study of possible ways of State delivery of services for which assistance is authorized by title X of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 300 et seq.] and to report to Congress on results of such study 18 months after Aug. 13, 1981.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Petrochemicals LP (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


May 15, 2003                            /s/ Carl S. Stutts
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Carl S. Stutts
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Texas Petrochemicals LP and will be retained by Texas Petrochemicals
LP and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 120.62 U.S. person.

*U.S. person* means a person who is a lawful permanent resident as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or who is a protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3). It also means any corporation, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other entity, organization, or group that is incorporated to do business in the United States. It also includes any governmental (Federal, state, or local) entity. It does not include any foreign person as defined in § 120.63.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark T. Hilz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




June 3, 2011
By:
/s/ MARK T. HILZMark T. HilzChief Executive Officer
215.604Agency points of contact.       (a)(3) The guidance at FAR 15.604(a)(3) applies to commercial solutions openings.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 215.6 - UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1)    Theundersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period October 23, 2019 through March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale andServicing Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2019 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2019-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2)    To thebest of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
19 

**