Hunter Biden, Burisma,

and Corruption:

The Impact on U.S.

Government Policy and

Related Concerns

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland

Security and Governmental Affairs

U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

Majority Staff Report
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

II. INTRODUCTION

III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WERE

AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE

ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A

CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS

ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION.

VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S

OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO

UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE.

VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S

BOARD.

IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM

HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER UKRAINIAN

OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO.

X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A

RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO

INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.

XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH

UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE

CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS.

XII. CONCLUSION
3

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding

integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the

country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb. 21 when

Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych abdicated by fleeing the country. Less than two months

later, over the span of only 28 days, significant events involving the Bidens unfolded. 

On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon

Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon

after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” 

The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April

28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner,

Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma,

and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid

millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.

The 2014 protests in Kyiv came to be known as the Revolution of Dignity — a revolution

against corruption in Ukraine. Following that revolution, Ukrainian political figures were

desperate for U.S. support. Zlochevsky would have made sure relevant Ukrainian officials were

well aware of Hunter’s appointment to Burisma’s board as leverage. Hunter Biden’s position on

the board created an immediate potential conflict of interest that would prove to be problematic

for both U.S. and Ukrainian officials and would affect the implementation of Ukraine policy. 

The Chairmen’s investigation into potential conflicts of interest began in August 2019,

with Chairman Grassley’s letter to the Department of Treasury regarding potential conflicts of

interest with respect to Obama administration policy relating to the Henniges transaction.1

During the Obama administration, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

(CFIUS) approved a transaction that gave control over Henniges, an American maker of antivibration technologies with military applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation

company and a China-based investment firm with established ties to the Chinese government. 

One of the companies involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private

investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was formed in November 2013 by a

merger between the Chinese-government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a company named

Rosemont Seneca Partners. Rosemont Seneca was formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of

then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John

Kerry, and others.2 

 

1 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley Raises Concerns Over Obama Admin Approval of U.S.

Tech Company Joint Sale to Chinese Government and Investment Firm Linked to Biden, Kerry Families (Aug. 15, 2019),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-raises-concerns-over-obama-admin-approval-of-us-tech-companyjoint-sale-to-chinese-government-and-investment-firm-linked-to-biden-kerry-families.

2 Peter Schweizer, Inside the Shady Private Equity Firm Run by Kerry and Biden’s Kids, NEW YORK POST (Mar. 15, 2018),

https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

Troubling Reason Why Biden is so Soft on China, NEW YORK POST (May 11, 2019), https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troublingreason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/; Tom Llamas et al., Biden Sidesteps Questions About His Son’s Foreign Business

Dealings but Promises Ethics Pledge, ABC NEWS (June 20, 2019), https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-sidesteps-questionssons-foreign-business-dealings-promises/story?id=63820806 (Stating that Hunter Biden was a managing partner at Rosemont

Seneca Partners.).
4

Access to relevant documents and testimony has been persistently hampered by criminal

investigations, impeachment proceedings, COVID-19, and several instances of obstructive

behavior. Accordingly, this investigation has taken longer than it should have. The Chairmen’s

efforts have always been driven by our belief that the public has the right to know about

wrongdoing and conflicts of interest occurring within government, and especially those conflicts

brought about by the actions of governmental officials. This is a good-government oversight

investigation that relies on documents and testimony from U.S. agencies and officials, not a

Russian disinformation campaign, as our Democratic colleagues have falsely stated.

What the Chairmen discovered during the course of this investigation is that the Obama

administration knew that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board was problematic and did

interfere in the efficient execution of policy with respect to Ukraine. Moreover, this

investigation has illustrated the extent to which officials within the Obama administration

ignored the glaring warning signs when the vice president’s son joined the board of a company

owned by a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch. And, as will be discussed in later sections, Hunter Biden

was not the only Biden who cashed in on Joe Biden’s vice presidency.

This report not only details examples of extensive and complex financial transactions

involving the Bidens, it also describes the quandary other U.S. governmental officials faced as

they attempted to guide and support Ukraine’s anticorruption efforts. The Committees will

continue to evaluate the information and evidence as it becomes available.

Key Findings

 In early 2015 the former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv,

Ukraine, George Kent, raised concerns to officials in Vice President Joe Biden’s office

about the perception of a conflict of interest with respect to Hunter Biden’s role on

Burisma’s board. Kent’s concerns went unaddressed, and in September 2016, he

emphasized in an email to his colleagues, “Furthermore, the presence of Hunter Biden

on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials pushing an

anticorruption agenda in Ukraine.”

 In October 2015, senior State Department official Amos Hochstein raised concerns with

Vice President Biden, as well as with Hunter Biden, that Hunter Biden’s position on

Burisma’s board enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S.

policy in Ukraine.

 Although Kent believed that Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board was awkward for

all U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine, the Committees are only

aware of two individuals — Kent and former U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for

International Energy Affairs Amos Hochstein — who raised concerns to Vice President

Joe Biden (Hochstein) or his staff (Kent). 

 The awkwardness for Obama administration officials continued well past his presidency. 

Former Secretary of State John Kerry had knowledge of Hunter Biden’s role on
5

Burisma’s board, but when asked about it at a town hall event in Nashua, N.H. on Dec. 8,

2019, Kerry falsely said, “I had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.” Evidence

to the contrary is detailed in Section V.

 Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland

testified that confronting oligarchs would send an anticorruption message in Ukraine. 

Kent told the Committees that Zlochevsky was an “odious oligarch.” However, in

December 2015, instead of following U.S. objectives of confronting oligarchs, Vice

President Biden’s staff advised him to avoid commenting on Zlochevsky and

recommended he say, “I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals.” 

 Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma’s board (supposedly consulting on corporate

governance and transparency) when Zlochevsky allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to

officials serving under Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Vitaly Yarema, to “shut the case

against Zlochevsky.” Kent testified that this bribe occurred in December 2014 (seven

months after Hunter joined Burisma’s board), and, after learning about it, he and the

Resident Legal Advisor reported this allegation to the FBI.

 Hunter Biden was a U.S. Secret Service protectee from Jan. 29, 2009 to July 8, 2014. A

day before his last trip as a protectee, Time published an article describing Burisma’s

ramped up lobbying efforts to U.S. officials and Hunter’s involvement in Burisma’s

board. Before ending his protective detail, Hunter Biden received Secret Service

protection on trips to multiple foreign locations, including Moscow, Beijing, Doha, Paris,

Seoul, Manila, Tokyo, Mexico City, Milan, Florence, Shanghai, Geneva, London,

Dublin, Munich, Berlin, Bogota, Abu Dhabi, Nairobi, Hong Kong, Taipei, Buenos Aires,

Copenhagen, Johannesburg, Brussels, Madrid, Mumbai and Lake Como. 

 Andrii Telizhenko, the Democrats’ personification of Russian disinformation, met with

Obama administration officials, including Elisabeth Zentos, a member of Obama’s

National Security Council, at least 10 times. A Democrat lobbying firm, Blue Star

Strategies, contracted with Telizhenko from 2016 to 2017 and continued to request his

assistance as recent as the summer of 2019. A recent news article detailed other

extensive contacts between Telizhenko and Obama administration officials.

 In addition to the over $4 million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden’s and Archer’s board

memberships, Hunter Biden, his family, and Archer received millions of dollars from

foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds.

 Archer received $142,300 from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan, purportedly for a car,

the same day Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy

Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in

Crimea.

 Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the

former mayor of Moscow.
6

 Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong to fund a $100,000 global

spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden.

 Hunter Biden had business associations with Ye Jianming, Gongwen Dong, and other

Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People’s Liberation

Army. Those associations resulted in millions of dollars in cash flow.

 Hunter Biden paid nonresident women who were nationals of Russia or other Eastern

European countries and who appear to be linked to an “Eastern European prostitution or

human trafficking ring.” 
7

II. INTRODUCTION

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) and

the Senate Committee on Finance undertook this investigation into potential conflicts of interest,

and the involvement of the Biden family in foreign business ventures while Joe Biden was vice

president, following allegations that the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy could have been

affected by Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma, and that family members may have

improperly sought to benefit from their relationship with the vice president. 

The first letter written regarding potential conflicts of interest was sent by Chairman

Grassley on Aug. 14, 2019, relating to the Henniges transaction.3 That was an Obama-era

Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved transaction which

gave control over Henniges, an American maker of anti-vibration technologies with military

applications, to a Chinese government-owned aviation company and a China-based investment

firm with established ties to the communist Chinese government. One of the companies

involved in the Henniges transaction was a billion-dollar private investment fund called Bohai

Harvest RST (BHR). BHR was reportedly formed in November 2013 by a merger between the

Chinese government-linked firm Bohai Capital and a U.S. company named Rosemont Seneca

Partners. Rosemont Seneca Partners was reportedly formed in 2009 by Hunter Biden, the son of

then-Vice President Joe Biden, by Chris Heinz, the stepson of former Secretary of State John

Kerry, and by others.4 

The direct involvement of Hunter Biden and Heinz in the acquisition of Henniges by the

Chinese government creates a potential conflict of interest. Both are directly related to highranking Obama administration officials. The Department of State, then under Mr. Kerry’s

leadership, is also a CFIUS member and played a direct role in the decision to approve the

Henniges transaction. The appearance of a potential conflict of interest in this case was

particularly troubling given Hunter Biden’s history of investing in and collaborating with

Chinese companies, including at least one that clearly poses significant national security

concerns. This history with China precedes and follows the 2015 Henniges transaction. This

report will discuss Hunter Biden’s and Devon Archer’s corporate entities and their links to the

communist Chinese government in more detail.

In 2019, newly released documents, made public as a result of Freedom of Information

Act (FOIA) requests and investigative reporting, brought fresh public attention and scrutiny to

 

3 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley Raises Concerns Over Obama Admin Approval of

U.S. Tech Company Joint Sale to Chinese Government and Investment Firm Linked to Biden, Kerry Families (Aug. 15, 2019),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-raises-concerns-over-obama-admin-approval-of-us-tech-companyjoint-sale-to-chinese-government-and-investment-firm-linked-to-biden-kerry-families.

4 Peter Schweizer, Inside the Shady Private Equity Firm Run by Kerry and Biden’s Kids, NEW YORK POST (Mar. 15, 2018),

https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/; Peter Schweizer, The

Troubling Reason Why Biden is so Soft on China, NEW YORK POST (May 11, 2019), https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troublingreason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/; Tom Llamas, et al., Biden Sidesteps Questions About His Son’s Foreign Business

Dealings but Promises Ethics Pledge, ABC NEWS (June 20, 2019), https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-sidesteps-questionssons-foreign-business-dealings-promises/story?id=63820806 (Stating that Hunter Biden was a managing partner at Rosemont

Seneca Partners.).
8

potential conflicts of interest with respect to Ukraine policy in the Obama administration.5 

Additionally, news reporting also raised questions about potential conflicts of interest with

respect to Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China, Ukraine and Russia while Joe Biden was

serving as vice president.

6

 Accordingly, on Nov. 6, 2019, Chairman Grassley and Chairman

Johnson wrote a letter to the Department of State regarding potential conflicts of interest due to

Hunter Biden’s position on the board of the corrupt Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings

Limited while Vice President Biden was the “public face of the administration’s handling of

Ukraine.”7 

The Committees’ investigation focused on determining whether Hunter Biden and Devon

Archer sought to benefit financially from their relationship with then-Vice President Joe Biden

or if they sought to influence U.S. policy in Ukraine on behalf of Burisma. Further, the

Committees reviewed and evaluated the Obama administration’s handling of Ukraine policy to

determine whether policy decisions related to Ukraine and Burisma were improperly influenced

by the employment and financial interests of family members of the administration.

For example, after joining Burisma’s board, Biden and Archer subsequently requested

meetings with senior State Department officials, including then-Secretary of State John Kerry

and then-Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken.8 Further, a Democratic lobbying firm, Blue

Star Strategies, working on behalf of Burisma, also invoked Hunter Biden’s association with

Burisma while requesting a meeting with then-Under Secretary of State Catherine Novelli to

discuss matters of concern related to the Department of State’s position that Burisma was a

corrupt company.9 

In 2016, Ukraine’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, had an active and ongoing

investigation into Burisma and its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.10 At the time, Archer and Hunter

 

5 See Alana Goodman, John Kerry’s son cut business ties with Hunter Biden over Ukrainian oil deal, THE WASHINGTON

EXAMINER (Aug. 27, 2019), https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/john-kerrys-son-cut-business-ties-with-hunter-bidenover-ukrainian-oil-deal; see also John Solomon, These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden’s Ukraine story, THE HILL

(Sept. 26, 2019), https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidensukraine-story; Jessica Donati, Firm Hired by Ukraine’s Burisma Tried to Use Hunter Biden as Leverage, Documents show, THE

WALL STREET JOURNAL (Nov. 5, 2019), https://www.wsj.com/articles/firm-hired-by-ukraines-burisma-tried-to-use-hunter-bidenas-leverage-documents-show-11573009615.

6 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign; Joseph Simonson,

Hunter Biden arranged meeting between father and Chinese business partner during vice presidential visit: Report, THE

WASHINGTON EXAMINER (July 1, 2019), https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hunter-biden-arrangement-of-fathersmeeting-with-chinese-business-partner-draws-scrutiny; Ben Schreckinger, Biden Inc., POLITICO (Aug. 2, 2019),

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/02/joe-biden-investigation-hunter-brother-hedge-fund-money-2020-campaign227407. 

7 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Johnson, Grassley Call for State Department to Release

Documents on Hunter Biden and Burisma (Nov. 7, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/johnsongrassley-call-state-department-release-documents-hunter-biden-and-burisma.

8 Emails between Hunter Biden and U.S. Dep’t of St. employees (May 2015) (on file with Comms.), Email between U.S. Dep’t

of St. employees (Mar. 2, 2016) (on file with Comms.).

9

John Solomon, Hunter Biden’s Ukraine gas firm pressed Obama administration to end corruption allegations, memos show,

(Nov. 4, 2019), https://johnsolomonreports.com/hunter-bidens-ukraine-gas-firm-pressed-obama-administration-to-endcorruption-allegations-memos-show/.

10 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump Allies,

THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Oleg Sukhov,
9

Biden continued to serve on Burisma’s board of directors. According to news reports, then-Vice

President Biden “threatened to withhold $1 billion in United States loan guarantees if Ukraine’s

leaders did not dismiss [Shokin].”

11

 After that threat, Ukraine’s Parliament fired Shokin.

 Pursuant to the scope of this investigation, the Committees requested relevant Obama

administration records from several U.S. federal government agencies and interviewed current

and former U.S. government officials with firsthand knowledge of the Obama administration’s

handling of U.S. policy in Ukraine. The Committees sent requests for information to the

Department of State, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Department of

Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Secret Service, Department of the Treasury,

and the U.S. Democratic consulting firm Blue Star Strategies.12 Accordingly, this investigation is

based on Obama administration federal government records and records from a Democrat lobby

shop, Blue Star Strategies.

Senate Resolution 70 gives HSGAC express authority “to study or investigate... the

efficiency and economy of operations of all branches of the government, including the possible

 

Powerful suspects escape justice on Lutsenko’s watch, KYIV POST (Apr. 13, 2018), https://www.kyivpost.com/ukrainepolitics/powerful-suspects-escape-justice-lutsenkos-watch.html?cn-reloaded=1. 

11 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump Allies,

THE NEW YORK TIMES(May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html; Glen Kessler,

Correcting a media error: Biden’s Ukraine showdown was in December 2015, THE WASHINGTON POST (Oct. 2, 2019),

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/02/correcting-media-error-bidens-ukraine-showdown-was-december/

(Another report indicates that Vice President Biden made this threat in late 2015); Tim Hains, FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden

Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor, REALCLEARPOLITICS (Sept. 27,

2019),

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_t

o_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html. (Joe Biden was recorded, in a January 2018 appearance at the Council on Foreign

Relations, bragging about threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine in an attempt to force the Ukrainian government to fire

Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. Joe Biden is recorded bragging that in response to his threat to withhold the aid, “[w]ell son

of a bitch. [Viktor Shokin] got fired.”).

12 Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Se. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S.

Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 6, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-

06%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Sec.%20Pompeo%20re%20Burisma%20Inquiry.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.

Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just.

(Sep. 27, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09-

27%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on

Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Nat’l Archives and Records

Administration (Nov. 21, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-

21%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Archivist%20Ferriero%20re%20Records%20Request.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson,

S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just.

and Fed. Bureau of Investigation (Nov. 22, 2019), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019-11-

22%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20%28Chalupa%20Records%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.

Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to Blue Star Strategies

(Dec. 3, 2019), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-12-

3%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Blue%20Star%20Strategies%20re%20Burisma.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.

Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Secret Serv. (Feb.

5, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2020-02-

05%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20Secret%20Service%20%28Biden%20Travel%29.pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S.

Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Apr.

30, 2020), https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-04-

30%20RHJ%20CEG%20to%20State%20(Ukraine%20Follow%20Up).pdf; Letter from Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on

Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 6, 2020),

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-

06%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20Sec.%20Pompeo%20re%20Burisma%20Inquiry.pdf.
10

existence of... corruption or unethical practices... [and] conflicts of interest.”13 The Committee

on Finance has broad jurisdiction over the United States government and, specifically, the

Department of Treasury and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which

includes oversight jurisdiction over potential financial crimes.14

 

13 S. Res. 70, 116th Cong. at 30 (2018), https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/sres70/BILLS-116sres70ats.pdf.

14 See U.S. S. Comm. on Fin., Jurisdiction, https://www.finance.senate.gov/about/jurisdiction.
11

III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Federal regulation prohibits federal government employees from “us[ing] [] public office

for [] private gain ... or for the private gain of ... relatives.”15 This regulation also seek “[t]o

ensure that the performance of [] official duties does not give rise to an appearance of the use of

public office for private gain or of giving preferential treatment[.]”16 This regulation, however,

does not apply to the president or vice president.17

Other federal regulations require only the “consideration” of an appearance of a conflict

of interest. “Where an employee ... knows that a person with whom he has a covered

relationship [e.g.,] is or represents a party to [a particular matter involving specific parties], and

where the employee determines that the circumstances would cause a reasonable person with

knowledge of the relevant facts to question his impartiality on the matter, the employee should

not participate in the matter unless he has informed [a designated superior] and received

authorization[.]”18

According to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), these rules and regulations help to

ensure that federal employees “fulfill[] their responsibility to endeavor to act at all times in the

public’s interest and avoid losing impartiality or appearing to lose impartiality in carrying out

their official duties.”19 In the context of U.S. foreign policy, the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM)

sets forth the policies and procedures for State Department employees working abroad. The

FAM includes ethical regulations that take into account foreign policy considerations and treaty

and statutory obligations.20 Specifically, when a U.S. citizen employee of the State Department21

is serving abroad and subject to the authority of that country’s Chief of Mission, that employee’s

family members may be prohibited from employment or other outside activity in any foreign

country if the Chief of Mission in that country determines it could damage the interests of the

United States.22 The FAM also requires employees to bring any violations of the FAM or any

other applicable regulations to the attention of the appropriate official.23

Although OGE’s authority to investigate and recommend solutions to most employees for

conflicts of interest issues is well-established, Congress did not extend this authority to the

president and vice president in OGE’s establishment statute. This does not mean there is an

absence of any authority to hold the President and Vice President accountable for conflict of

interest issues; rather, it demonstrates that the responsibility for holding the President and Vice

President responsible for conduct that implicates conflicts of interest lies elsewhere, namely,

with Congress and the American people.

 

15 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702.

16 Id. at § 2635.702(d).

17 Id. at § 2635.102.

18 Id. at § 2635.502.

19 Conflicts Analysis & Resolution, Office of Gov’t Ethics, https://www.oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/ethicsofficials_conflict-resolution.

20 3 FAM 4121.3.

21 The FAM rules referenced in this section apply to Foreign Service, Foreign Service National, and Civil Service employees. 3

FAM 4123.2-2; 3 FAM 4125.

22 3 FAM 4125.

23 3 FAM 4139.13.
12

In certain instances, like self-dealing, the harm is plain. In others, the harm — a loss or

apparent loss of impartiality — may be less concrete, but the effect is still the same.24 When the

impartiality of decision makers is drawn into question, it creates a chilling effect on the

credibility of their decision-making processing and the ultimate decision. That, in turn, could

undermine the effectiveness of U.S. policy. Although these consequences may sometimes be

difficult to measure or quantify, they certainly have an effect, or else there would be little reason

to regulate them in the first instance. In the context of foreign affairs, because these subtleties

matter, the FAM provides the Chief of Mission with the discretion to make these assessments. 

 

24 The House of Representatives appears to think these issues matter. A House committee has been investigating President

Trump and his family for “undisclosed conflicts of interest that may impair [the President’s] ability to make impartial policy

decisions.” Trump v. Mazars, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (July 9, 2020) (Quoting Rep. Elijah Cummings, Chairman of the House Oversight

Committee.).
13

IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS

WERE AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER

BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

a. Introduction

In early 2015, senior State Department official George Kent raised concerns to staff in

the Office of the Vice President about Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board. Kent testified

that he never heard anything back from the vice president’s office, and although Kent advised

that Hunter Biden should step down from Burisma’s board to avoid the perception of a potential

conflict of interest, his recommendation was not followed. 

Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board continued to be an issue State Department

officials had to manage when executing U.S. / Ukraine policy. More than a year after Kent

reported his concerns to the vice president’s staff, he wrote to his superiors that Hunter Biden’s

role on Burisma’s board was “very awkward” to those on the front lines pushing anticorruption

efforts in Ukraine on a daily basis.25 Kent testified that he felt the need to “prepar[e] everybody

for ‘what about-ism,’ because we’re pushing what’s right ... and we have to be prepared for

people who are critics, are opponents, to say, ‘Well, what about? What about Hunter Biden?’”

26

 

Indeed, Kent testified further that he “would have advised any American not to get on the board

of Zlochevsky’s company.”

27

 The Committees are also aware of at least one other senior State

Department official, Amos Hochstein, who raised concerns directly to Vice President Biden

about potential conflicts of interest relating to Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board.28 

Although Hochstein declined to testify about the substance of his conversation with Vice

President Biden,29 the New Yorker reported that Hochstein “did not go so far as to recommend

that Hunter leave the board.”

30

 The Committees found that neither the Office of the Vice

President nor the State Department ever took any action following these complaints. 

b. In February 2015, Kent raised concerns about the perception of a conflict of interest

regarding Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board.

According to Kent, in early 2015 when he was still Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at

the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, he learned that Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma.31 Kent

stated, “[s]oon after that, in a briefing call with the National Security staff in the Office of the

Vice President on other matters, in February 2015, I raised my concern that Hunter Biden’s

status as a board member could create the perception of a conflict of interest.”32 Kent continued:

 

25 Transcript of Interview at 224, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of

George Kent (July 24, 2020). [Hereinafter George Kent Testimony].

26 George Kent Testimony at 221.

27 George Kent Testimony at 110.

28 Transcript of Interview at 98, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Victoria

Nuland (Sept. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter Victoria Nuland Testimony].

29 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 52-58.

30 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, New Yorker (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

31 George Kent Testimony at 16.

32 George Kent Testimony at 16.
14

I said that I had learned that Hunter Biden had been appointed to a

board of this company, that I had just raised U.S. concerns about

the owner of the company, who we believed had been engaged in

money-laundering. ... [T]he bottom line was, I said I believe

that this creates the perception of a potential conflict of

interest, given Vice President Biden’s role and his very strong

advocacy for anticorruption action, and that I thought that

someone needed to talk to Hunter Biden, and he should [step]

down from the board of Burisma.

33

When the Committees asked Kent who he spoke to in Vice President Biden’s office, he

stated, “I can’t remember, to be perfectly honest. I don’t remember who I spoke to.”

34

 Kent told

the Committees that, after raising this concern, he never heard anything back from the vice

president’s office.35

c. Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma continued to be an “awkward” conflict of

interest State Department officials had to manage.

Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma appeared in numerous State Department

records, particularly when State officials discussed the company, its owner, and anticorruption

efforts in Ukraine. According to records reviewed by the Committees, in 2016, Kent mentioned

Hunter Biden when discussing Burisma with his colleagues. Kent told the Committees:

For me it’s preparing everybody for “what about-ism,” because

we’re pushing what’s right, and we do what’s right, and we have to

be prepared for people who are critics, are opponents, to say,

“Well, what about? What about Hunter Biden?”

So there was no time, as I’ve testified, that the U.S. government,

the U.S. embassy ever made a decision about Zlochevsky or

Burisma where we took the presence of a private citizen on the

board into account. We made the decision on the merits. But

others might think otherwise. And so everyone needed to be aware

of what we were dealing with as we made the right decisions.36

The extent to which Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board affected U.S. policy toward

Ukraine is not clear. But what is clear from the records, however, is that State Department

officials, particularly Kent himself, regularly considered how Hunter Biden’s connection to

Burisma might affect the execution of U.S. policy. Moreover, as described previously, this

included having to respond to Russian actors attempting to exploit Hunter Biden’s position on

 

33 George Kent Testimony at 128-29 (emphasis added); see also George Kent Testimony at 110.

34 George Kent Testimony at 128.

35 George Kent Testimony at 226.

36 George Kent Testimony at 221 (emphasis added).
15

Burisma’s board to drive a wedge between Ukrainian and the U.S. in an effort to undermine U.S.

policy toward Ukraine.

For example, Kent raised Hunter Biden’s connection to Burisma during multiple

discussions over emails involving the Municipal Energy Reform Program (MERP).37 In those

emails, Kent asked his colleagues, “[H]ow have we traditionally treated/engaged Burisma,

given the Zlochevsky connection, but also perhaps US involvement beyond Hunter Biden?”

38

 

In another email chain, Kent also pointed out that “[Zlochevsky] put Hunter Biden on the

board of his Burisma Energy company.”39 When inquiring about the extent to which State

Department officials researched Burisma’s past, in order to determine whether to associate with

the company, Kent asked his colleagues whether any ‘“know your partner’ due diligence was

done” before the partnership between MERP and Burisma was established.40 Kent then

described old news stories involving the company: “Zlochevsky as a corrupt mal actor was a

2014 story [and] his control of Burisma, and the very sticky wicket of the Hunter Biden

connection on Burisma’s board was circulating in 2015.”41 As part of that same email chain,

Kent asked his colleagues if the U.S. government continues its association with Burisma:

[W]ould we want an article on the front page of the Washington

Post (and in this case, the Kyiv Post, and on the FB pages of Sergiy

Leshchenko and Mustafa Nayyem) commenting about this public

private partnership with Burisma, the link to Hunter Biden,

and the link to Zlochevsky, who almost certainly paid off the

PGO in December 2014 (I had the then First deputy PG Danylenko

tell me the bribe was $7 million) to have the case against him

closed and his $23 million in assets frozen in the UK unfrozen?42

 

37 Kent told the Committee that he mentioned Hunter Biden’s name in this context because he believed that “all U.S. Government

officials need to be aware of all the factors involved in an issue.” George Kent Testimony at 113. When asked why Kent did not

raise the names of other individuals on Burisma’s board he said, “the one American that I was aware of that was on the board [in

August 2016] was Hunter Biden.” George Kent Testimony at 114. The MERP was a program funded by the United States

Agency for International Development (USAID). According to State Department documents, the MERP and Burisma entered

into a Memorandum of Understanding on October 13, 2014. Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, et al.,

U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 12, 2016, 16:47:00), [STATE-2019-18-0000357] (attaching Memorandum of Understanding between the

MERP in Ukraine and Burisma Holdings Limited (Oct. 13, 2014), [STATE-2019-18-0000361-364]). Kent testified that, “in

2015, there had been a set of awards given by this program implementer that had been funded by Burisma. They were planning

another set of awards, a second set of awards in mid-September [. . . .] We pulled the plug and there was no second.” George

Kent Testimony at 124. USAID “withdrew its [MERP] cooperation with Burisma” in September 2016. Email from Redacted,

U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6, 2016, 00:18:23 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-0001205] (attaching

Briefing Checklist: Ambassador Yovanovitch’s Meeting with Karen Tramontano, Blue Star Strategies [STATE-2019-18-

0001207]).

38 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM) [STATE-2019-

18-0000377-378].

39 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to John Herbst, Atlantic Council, and William Taylor, U.S. Inst. of Peace (Aug.

29, 2016, 11:23 AM) [STATE-2019-18-0000365-368] (emphasis added).

40 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al. (Aug. 31, 2016, 21:55) [State2019-18-0000398-399].

41 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al. (Aug. 31, 2016, 21:55) [State2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added). 

42 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al. (Aug. 31, 2016, 21:55) [State2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).
16

So even though the total amount of time State Department officials spent accounting for

Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma is unclear, the records show that it was an issue that

had to be addressed repeatedly.

d. More than one year after Kent reported his concerns about Hunter Biden to the vice

president’s office, he once again raised the issue — this time to his superiors at the

State Department.

On Sept. 6, 2016, Kent wrote an email to senior State Department officials, including

Deputy Assistant Secretary Bridget Brink and U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, and offered

his contemporaneous view of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Kent wrote, “the

presence of Hunter Biden on the Burisma board was very awkward for all U.S. officials

pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine.”43 In testimony Kent expanded on this

comment:

I meant that people who talk the talk need to walk the walk, and

for the U.S. government, collectively, when we talk about the need

to have high standards of integrity, again, as I’ve said, the presence

of [Hunter Biden] on the board created the perception of a

potential conflict of interest.44

The Committees learned, through document requests, that Victoria Nuland, thenAssistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, also received a forwarded copy

of Kent’s September 2016 email outlining his concerns about Hunter Biden being on Burisma’s

board. Nuland testified that she “was always open to hearing the concerns of subordinates and

trying to address them in an open and transparent manner.”45 Yet when the Committee asked

Nuland to explain what actions she took when she received Kent’s email, she said that Kent’s

concerns about Hunter Biden were “clearly, way deep down in an email, late in 2016” and “they

were not brought to my specific attention by George Kent, who is an old friend and had plenty of

opportunity to do so, had he so wanted.”46 Despite senior State Department officials clearly

being made aware of the situation, Kent’s concerns remained unaddressed.

e. Hochstein spoke to Vice President Biden about concerns relating to Hunter Biden’s

role on Burisma’s board because, according to Hochstein, Russians were using it to

advance disinformation.

According to testimony and public reports, Hochstein, then-U.S. Special Envoy and

Coordinator for International Energy Affairs, raised concerns about Hunter Biden’s role on

Burisma’s board directly to Vice President Biden. Nuland told the Committees:

 

43 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Bridget Brink, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 6, 2016, 09:55:14 -0400) [STATE2019-18-0000345-347] (emphasis added).

44 George Kent Testimony at 220.

45 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 121.

46 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 121-22.
17

Amos Hochstein had had a conversation with the vice

president and his staff about this, and he also had another

conversation on the plane ride to Ukraine for that December 2015

trip.47

Public reporting also confirms Hochstein’s discussion with Vice President Biden. 

According to one report, “Amos Hochstein, the Obama Administration’s special envoy for

energy policy, raised the matter with Biden, but did not go so far as to recommend that Hunter

leave the board.”48 When Hochstein testified before the Committees, he declined on advice of

counsel to testify about the substance of his conversation with Vice President Biden.

49 The New

Yorker, however, reported that Hochstein “did not go so far as to recommend that Hunter leave

the board.”50 It is unclear how Vice President Biden responded to this conversation.

 

According to Hochstein, he raised this issue with Vice President Biden because he was

concerned that the Russians were using Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma to sow

disinformation.51 Hochstein recounted that he spoke with Vice President Biden in the West

Wing of the White House in October 2015.52 When asked why he decided to raise the issue of

Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board with Vice President Biden, Hochstein testified:

Hochstein: We were starting to think about a trip to Ukraine, and I wanted to make

sure that he [Vice President Biden] was aware that there was an

increase in chatter on media outlets close to Russians and corrupt

oligarchs-owned media outlets about undermining his message—to

try to undermine his [Vice President Biden’s] message and including

Hunter Biden being part of the board of Burisma.

53

Hochstein also raised his concerns about Russian disinformation with Hunter Biden. 

Shortly after his conversation with Vice President Biden, Hunter Biden contacted Hochstein and

asked to meet. According to Hochstein, Hunter became aware of Hochstein’s West Wing

conversation with the Vice President, who had mentioned it to Hunter.

54

 Hochstein described

what he and Hunter Biden discussed at this November 2015 meeting at a coffee shop in

Georgetown:55

Question: And could you expand on that? Why did you discuss Burisma with him

[Hunter Biden]?

 

47 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 98.

48 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

49 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 52-58.

50 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, New Yorker (July 1, 2019).

51 Transcript of Interview at 50, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Amos

Hochstein Testimony (Sept. 17, 2020). [Hereinafter Amos Hochstein Testimony].

52 Id. at 51.

53 Id. at 112-13. (emphasis added).

54 Id. at 117.

55 Id. at 118.
18

Hochstein: Well, he [Hunter Biden] asked me for a meeting. I think he wanted to

know my views on Burisma and Zlochevsky. And so I shared with him

that the Russians were using his name in order to sow

disinformation—attempt to sow disinformation among Ukrainians.

56

During the November 2015 conversation with Hunter Biden, Hochstein did not

recommend that Hunter leave Burisma’s board because he did not “believe that was my place to

have that discussion, one way or the other.”57

f. Conclusion

Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board hindered the efforts of dedicated career-service

individuals who were fighting for anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Because the vice

president’s son had a direct link to a corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials

were required to maintain situational awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. 

Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of

continuing to push an anticorruption agenda in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the

board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt owner, earning tens of thousands of dollars a

month. As Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board of

Zlochevsky’s company.”

58

 Yet even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board cast a

shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the Committees are

only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite the efforts of these

individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears.

 

56 Id. at 50 (emphasis added).

57 Id. at 117.

58 George Kent Testimony at 110. 
19

V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

a. Introduction

On Dec. 8, 2019, a reporter asked former Secretary of State John Kerry about his

awareness of Hunter Biden on Burisma’s board during his time at the State Department.59 Kerry

responded, “I had no knowledge about any of that. None. No.”

60

 The reporter pressed for more

information and Kerry said, “What would I know about any—no. Why would I know about any

company or any individual? No. The answer is no. No communication. No nothing.”61 

Testimony and documents obtained by the Committees call into question the accuracy of Kerry’s

statement. On May 13, 2014, the day after Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board, Secretary

Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz — who was also Hunter Biden’s business partner — emailed

to inform Kerry’s chief of staff, and to distance himself, from that decision. Moreover, in May

2014, Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff, David Wade, briefed him about press inquiries specifically

relating to Heinz, Hunter Biden, and Burisma. Separately, State Department officials wrote that

they sent the secretary articles with the headlines, “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas company’s

board,” “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas producer board,” and “White House says no issue with

Biden’s son, Ukraine gas company.”62 Accordingly, these records suggest that Kerry did, in fact,

know about Hunter Biden and Burisma.

b. In May 2014, Wade, Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff, briefed him about press

inquiries relating to Heinz, Hunter Biden, and Burisma.

On May 13, 2014, State Department officials began fielding press inquiries relating to

Hunter Biden joining Burisma’s board and the extent to which Secretary Kerry’s stepson, Heinz,

was involved. That day Heinz emailed Secretary Kerry’s chief of staff about Burisma’s

announcement in an apparent attempt to distance himself from Hunter Biden’s decision.63 

Heinz wrote to Special Assistant Matt Summers and Chief of Staff Wade:

Apparently Devon [Archer] and Hunter [Biden] both joined the

board of Burisma and a press release went out today. I cant to

speak [sic] why they decided to, but there was no investment by

our firm in their company.64

 

59 Amanda Golden (@amandawgolden), NBC NEWS, Twitter (Dec. 8, 2019 2:28 PM),

https://twitter.com/amandawgolden/status/1203758177726189574.

60 Id.

61 Id.

62 Emails between David Thorne and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 13, 2014) [STATE-2019-18-0000733].

63 Christopher Heinz had business dealings with Hunter Biden and Devon Archer through their firm Rosemont Seneca. 

According to Heinz’s spokesman he “strongly warned Mr. Archer that working with Burisma was unacceptable” and “[t]he lack

of judgment in this matter was a major catalyst for Mr. Heinz ending his business relationships with Mr. Archer and Mr. Biden.” 

Paul Sonne, Michael Kranish, Matt Viser, The gas tycoon and the vice president’s son: The story of Hunter Biden’s foray into

Ukraine, THE WASHINGTON POST (Sept. 28, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-gas-tycoon-andthe-vice-presidents-son-the-story-of-hunter-bidens-foray-in-ukraine/2019/09/28/1aadff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-

d943b4ed57e0_story.html.

64 Email from Chris Heinz to Matt Summers and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 13, 2014),

https://www.scribd.com/document/433436789/CU-v-State-FOIA-Doc-Ukraine; see also Alana Goodman, John Kerry’s son cut
20

Wade testified that he did not recall receiving this email from Heinz, but he did, to the

best of his recollection, reach out to speak with Heinz the following day to “try to confirm since

we were being asked whether he, or that Rosemont Seneca was buying or investing in

Burisma.”65 Wade testified that he spoke to Heinz on May 14, 2014, and confirmed, based only

on Heinz’s assurances, that “Rosemont Seneca was not involved” with Burisma.66

According to Wade, that same day he spoke to Secretary Kerry and “let him know that

Chris Heinz and Rosemont Seneca were not involved [with Burisma], that the media questions

[about Rosemont Seneca buying or investing in Burisma] were inaccurate, and that Chris Heinz

was not buying or investing in a Ukrainian natural gas company, but that my understanding was

that ... Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, according to the stories, that that was accurate, that they

were ... joining a board.”67 Wade confirmed that Secretary Kerry learned about Hunter Biden’s

association with Burisma through him:

Question: What was Secretary Kerry’s reaction to you informing him of these news

inquiries about Mr. Heinz and the additional information regarding Mr.

Archer’s [and] Mr. Hunter Biden’s connection and involvement with

Burisma?

Wade: He knew nothing about it.

Question: So he learned about this information from you?

Wade: I believe so, yeah.

Question: And when you told him that the information that you were able to confirm

with Mr. Heinz that Rosemont Seneca had ... not invested or bought

Burisma, what was Mr. Kerry's reaction to that?

Wade: If I recall, his reaction was that he was comfortable answering a press

question if he got it.

. . . .

Question: [T]hat he was comfortable answering the media question regarding what?

Wade: Regarding ... Christopher Heinz or Rosemont Seneca investing in — in a

Ukrainian natural gas company or buying a Ukrainian natural gas

 

business ties with Hunter Biden over Ukrainian oil deal, THE WASH. EXAMINER (Aug. 27, 2019),

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/john-kerrys-son-cut-business-ties-with-hunter-biden-over-ukrainian-oil-deal.

65Transcript of Interview at 39, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of David

Wade (Aug. 3, 2020). [Hereinafter David Wade Testimony].

66 David Wade Testimony at 41.

67 David Wade Testimony at 47.
21

company.

Question: And did you discuss with Mr. Kerry what his response to that type of

inquiry would have been?

Wade: I'm sure — I'm sure I did. I don't — I don’t ... remember those details of

the conversation. 68

c. In May 2014, State Department staff sent news articles to Secretary Kerry relating

to Hunter Biden and Burisma.

David Thorne, who served as a senior adviser to Secretary Kerry, informed Wade that he

sent the following collection of press clips and articles to the secretary on May 14, 2014:69

Thorne forwarded these clips to Wade and wrote, “I sent it to JK[.]”

70

 Wade told the

Committees that “JK” stood for “John Kerry.”

71

 The headlines of the articles that Thorne sent to

Kerry included, “Biden’s son joins Ukrainian gas company’s board,” “Biden’s son joins

Ukrainian gas producer board,” and “White House says no issue with Biden's son, Ukraine gas

company.”72

 

68 David Wade Testimony at 50-51 (emphasis added).

69 Email from David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., to David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 16, 2014, 20:52:30 +0000), [STATE2019-18-0000733].

70 Email from David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., to David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 16, 2014, 20:52:30 +0000), [STATE2019-18-0000733].

71 David Wade Testimony at 79.

72 Thorne’s email did not include the headlines of the articles, but it did contain links to the articles and a description of the article

including the publication date and the author’s name. Based on this information, the Committees were able to find the headlines

of the articles that Throne sent to Kerry. Emails between David Thorne, U.S. Dep’t of St., and David Wade, U.S. Dep’t of St.

(May 16, 2014), [STATE-2019-18-0000733].
22

d. Conclusion

Former Secretary Kerry’s December 2019 denial of having any knowledge about Hunter

Biden or Burisma is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by the Committees. Kerry was

briefed about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Heinz the day after Burisma announced Hunter Biden

joined its board. Additionally, Secretary Kerry’s senior advisor sent him press clips and articles

relating to Hunter Biden’s board membership. This appears to be yet another example of highranking Obama administration officials blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s association with

Burisma.
23

VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED ZLOCHEVSKY AS A

CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS

ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION.

a. Introduction

The State Department clearly viewed Burisma and its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, as

corrupt, and did not want to have any association with either one. For example, as soon as

Deputy Chief of Mission George Kent learned of a de minimis USAID arrangement with

Burisma, and succeeded in severing that relationship. As U.S. officials pressed Ukrainian

officials to hold Zlochevsky accountable for his actions, Vice President Biden was “leading the

policy charge” of pushing anticorruption measures in Ukraine, which included confronting

oligarchs.73 Yet as staff prepared talking points for Vice President Biden to answer questions

about whether he viewed Zlochevsky as corrupt, they suggested that he “not ... get into naming

names or accusing individuals.”74 Biden’s spokeswoman told reporters, “the vice president does

not endorse any particular company and has no involvement with this company.”75 This stands

in stark contrast to the decision of then-Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt to call out Zlochevsky by

name as an example of corruption in a September 2015 speech. Biden’s unwillingness to

confront a man whom State officials considered to be an “odious oligarch”

76 demonstrated a lack

of leadership, but also raises a serious question about why Vice President Biden would avoid

linking Zlochevsky with corruption.

b. State Department officials viewed Zlochevsky and Burisma as corrupt.

According to testimony and documents obtained by the Committees, State Department

officials viewed Burisma and its owner, Zlochevsky, as corrupt. Insofar as the link between

Zlochevsky and corruption was not already clear to State Department officials, in early 2015

they learned that Zlochevsky likely bribed Ukrainian prosecutors to interfere in a United

Kingdom criminal proceeding against him, which was subsequently closed. (Section VII of this

report will describe this bribe and its consequences in more detail.) In short, State Department

officials’ understanding of Zlochevsky’s actions relating to the U.K. criminal case strongly

influenced their perspective of him and Burisma. Below are several examples of State

Department officials sharing their perspective of Zlochevsky and Burisma:

 “Zlochevsky was viewed as corrupt, not just in Ukraine but by the USG/FBI[.]” –

George Kent, Department of State, Sept. 201677

 

73 George Kent Testimony at 21; Victoria Nuland Testimony at 99.

74 Email from Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015,

6:04 PM) [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554].

75 James Risen, Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 8, 2015),

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html.

76 George Kent Testimony at 104.

77 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Bridget Brink, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 6, 2016, 9:55:14 -0400), [STATE2019-18-0000345-347] (emphasis added).
24

 “[W]e have extensive concerns about corruption in Ukraine, and we believe Mr.

Zlochevsky is an example.” – Memo to then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie

Yovanovitch, Dec. 201678

 “Burisma's owner was a poster child for corrupt behavior[.]” – George Kent

Testimony to the Committees79

 “I would have advised any American not to get on the board of Zlochevsky’s company.”

– George Kent Testimony to the Committees80

 “The proliferation of Ukrainian companies clearly (and not so clearly owned/controlled

by odious oligarchs or those who outright stole assets and absconded (like

Zlochevsky) is likely a long one.” – George Kent, Department of State, Aug. 201681

 “Throughout 2015 and 2016, U.S. officials, particularly those at the U.S. Embassy in

K[y]iv, consistently pressed Ukrainian officials to hold Zlochevsky to account and

made clear our negative view about Burisma.” – George Kent Testimony to the

Committees82

 “...our focus was on [Zlochevsky’s] corrupt acts as minister when he abused the office

to award national gas exploration contracts to companies that he controlled through shell

companies.” – George Kent Testimony to the Committees83

 “[I]n the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky, the U.K. authorities had

seized $23 million in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people.” – Geoffrey

Pyatt, then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Sept. 201584

 The closing of the U.K. case against Zlochevsky was a “gross miscarriage of justice that

undermined months of U.S. assistance ... [a]fter the FBI and MI5 spent months and

arguably millions working to try to put together the first possible asset recover case

(against former Minister of Ecology Zlochevsky)[.]” – George Kent, State Department,

Aug. 201685

 

78 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6, 2016, 00:18:23 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-

0001205] (attaching Briefing Checklist: Ambassador Yovanovitch’s Meeting with Karen Tramontano, Blue Star Strategies

[STATE-2019-18-0001206-1208]).

79 George Kent Testimony at 21.

80 George Kent Testimony at 110.

81 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM), [STATE-2019-

18-0000377-378] (emphasis added). When asked whether Kent considered Zlochevsky as an “odious oligarch,” he responded, “I

did.” George Kent Testimony at 104.

82 George Kent Testimony at 20 (emphasis added).

83 George Kent Testimony at 110.

84 Remarks by U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt at the Odesa Financial Forum on September 24,

2015, Geoffrey Pyatt, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Remarks-by-USAmbassador-Geoffrey-Pyatt-at-the-Odesa-Financial-Forum-on-September-24-2015-ukraine.pdf (emphasis added).

85 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to William Taylor, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 29, 2016, 11:23 AM), [STATE2019-18-0000372-374] (emphasis added).
25

 “[The] U.S. and U.K. were cooperating on a case to seize [Zlochevsky’s] corrupt assets

overseas (which had passed through the U.S.).” – Geoffrey Pyatt, then-U.S. Ambassador

to Ukraine, Dec. 201586

 There is “a moral hazard associated with publicly associating/promoting our

assistance projects with companies/individuals seen in Ukrainian society as

corrupt/compromised.” – George Kent on whether any U.S. agency should cooperate or

associate with Burisma or Zlochevsky, Aug. 201687

 “[United States Government (USG)] cooperation on the project [with Burisma]

would make us look bad. Not to mention the [Members of Parliament] on the energy

committee and others would wonder how we speak about anti corruption [sic], but

work with those that were associated with corrupt practices.” – Redacted State

Department official in an email to colleagues, Sept. 201688

 “[There] is a clear link between the company and its primary owner. . . . From the

rumors that we hear in the energy sector, there is no sense that Burisma has changed

how it conducts its business. . . . I fall on the side of not having anything to do with

the company to avoid undermining our broader efforts to promote transparency and

[anticorruption].” – Redacted State Department official in an email to colleagues, Sept.

201689 

c. State Department officials viewed Vice President Biden as a “warrior” and “leading

the policy charge” on anticorruption measures in Ukraine.

According to testimony, former State Department officials saw Vice President Biden as a

leading U.S. figure who pushed for anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Kent testified, “Vice

President Biden was leading the policy charge, pushing President Poroshenko and Prime

Minister Yatsenyuk to take more decisive anticorruption action.”90 Ambassador Victoria Nuland

called Vice President Biden a “warrior” on this issue and said, “I was proud to work with Vice

President Biden on Ukraine policy and especially on trying to help the Ukrainian period [sic]

root out corruption in their country.”91

On December 9, 2015, Vice President Biden spoke in Ukraine in front of the parliament

of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, and told the members that they are facing a “test of courage”

 

86 Email from Geoffrey Pyatt, Ambassador to Ukraine, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Victoria Nuland, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Dec. 6,

2015, 11:13:00 -0500), [STATE-2019-18-0000325] (emphasis added).

87 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Jeffrey Cole, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Aug. 13, 2016, 3:26 PM), [STATE-2019-

18-0000377-378].

88 The project referenced in this email related to Burisma’s association with the MERP. Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St.,

to George Kent et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 1, 2016, 7:15 AM), [State-2019-18-0000505-506] (emphasis added). Kent would

later call the Burisma-MERP relationship as an “ill-advised USAID co-branding effort.” Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of

St., to Jorgan Andrew, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Nov. 22, 2016, 00:46:32 -0500), [State-2019-18-0000479].

89 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to George Kent, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Sept. 1, 2016, 7:46 AM), [State-2019-18-

0000505] (emphasis added).

90 George Kent Testimony at 21.

91 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 70.
26

and have an “obligation” to Ukrainians to reform their country to “build a united, democratic

Ukrainian nation that can stand the test of time.”92 In doing so, Biden stated that Ukrainians

have “a historic battle against corruption.”

93

 He said “[o]ligarchs and non-oligarchs must play

by the same rules.”94 Biden called on the Rada to “[s]eize the opportunity. Build a better future

for the people of Ukraine.”95 Biden’s speech, which pushed anticorruption measures, was,

according to Nuland, “very powerful and powerfully received by the Rada.”

96

 Yet, while Vice

President Biden called for members of the Rada to have courage to confront corruption in

Ukraine, the vice president’s staff was advising otherwise.

d. Vice President Biden’s staff recommended he not link Zlochevsky with corruption.

Nuland told the Committees that by confronting oligarchs, the U.S. would send an

anticorruption message.97 Yet as Vice President Biden’s staff responded to press inquiries

relating to Burisma and Zlochevsky, one staffer wrote, “I am concerned about getting into

anything relating to Mr. Zlochevsky directly.”98 Just a few days before the vice president gave

his December 2015 speech at the Rada pushing anticorruption measures, his staff prepared

talking points for him and included a response to the question: “Do you think Zlochevsky is

corrupt?”99 His staff wrote:

I’m not going to get into naming names or accusing individuals. 

We have been working consistently to push the Ukrainian

leadership to make meaningful changes in the Prosecutor General’s

office and across the government to help ensure that the Ukrainian

people are represented fairly and fully.100

It is clear that members of Vice President Biden’s staff wanted to distance him from an

individual whom the State Department clearly believed was corrupt and an individual who

employed his son. This stands in stark contrast to then-Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, who

identified Zlochevsky by name as a corrupt actor during a September 2015 speech in Odessa,

Ukraine. But the Committees were not able to locate any public statements Vice President Biden

gave from 2014 to 2016 in which he called Zlochevsky corrupt. Instead, in December 2015,

 

92 Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada (Dec. 9, 2015), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-pressoffice/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada.

93 Id.

94 Id.

95 Id.

96 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 96.

97 Victoria Nuland Testimony at 99.

98 Email from Kendra Barkoff, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Oct. 23, 2015,

10:00 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000339-340].

99 Email from Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015,

11:13 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554].

100 Email from Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, to Michael Carpenter, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015,

6:04 PM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553-554] (emphasis added). Ambassador Pyatt recommended changing the last sentence of

that answer to “Something like ‘... begin rooting out the cancer of corruption that has done so much over the years to hold back

economic growth and sap the confidence of Ukrainians in those who govern them.’” Email from Geoffrey Pyatt, Ambassador to

Ukraine, to Kate Bedingfield, Off. of the Vice President, et al. (Dec. 6, 2015, 11:13 AM), [STATE-2019-18-0000553].
27

Biden’s spokeswoman told reporters, “the vice president does not endorse any particular

company and has no involvement with this company.”101

e. Conclusion

In his December 2015 speech at the Rada, Vice President Biden told members to have

courage to confront corruption and change the course of history for their country. Yet when it

came to calling out an individual whom the State Department viewed as a “corrupt” and “odious

oligarch,” Vice President Biden’s staff advised him to not accuse Zlochevsky of corruption. In

December 2015, while in Ukraine, Biden did not link Zlochevsky with corruption and did not

demonstrate the same level of courageousness that he encouraged Ukrainian political leaders to

pursue. 

 Several witnesses highlighted efforts by certain U.S. officials to enable a successful

investigation of Zlochevsky, and also noted that the U.S. decision to condition a $1 billion loan

guarantee was made in part because of the then-Ukrainian prosecutor general’s failure to pursue

a case against Zlochevsky. But at the end of the day, between 2014 through 2017, despite the

concerted effort of many U.S. officials, not one of the three different Ukrainian prosecutor

generals held Zlochevsky accountable.

 

101 James Risen, Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 8, 2015),

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html.
28

VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S

OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO

UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE.

On May 12, 2014, Burisma trumpeted the addition of Hunter Biden to its board of

directors, stating, “Biden will be in charge of the [Burisma] Holdings’ legal unit and will provide

support for the Company among international organizations.”102 In that same press release,

Hunter Biden stated, “As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting

the company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international

expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of

Ukraine.”

103

 The company’s release went on to say that, Hunter was “a well-known public

figure,” but the release did not mention Hunter’s connection to a more well-known public figure,

his father, the vice president of the United States.104

When Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board in May 2014, the prosecutor general of

Ukraine was Oleh Makhnitskyi. Makhnitskyi served as the acting prosecutor general for only a

few months before resigning from the post.105 His resignation gave way to Vitaly Yarema, who

on June 19, 2014, became the prosecutor general of Ukraine.106 

George Kent, a career diplomat who served in a number of roles at the State Department

over his career, including several tours in Ukraine, did not hold Prosecutor General Yarema or

his team in high regard. In fact, he testified, “[Yarema’s] team failed to bring a single

prosecution over a seven-month period, and which allegedly took a bribe from [Burisma’s

owner] Zlochevsky to close the case against him and collapse our effort to recover the $23

million frozen in the United Kingdom”

107

a. Allegations that Zlochevsky bribed Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Office

In January 2015, Kent arrived in Kyiv and learned that the U.S. embassy was not

communicating with the Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office (PGO).

108

 Shortly after his

arrival, Kent asked a Department of Justice (DOJ) official posted at U.S. Embassy Kyiv to set up

a high-level meeting with the PGO. According to Kent, the goal of this meeting was for U.S.

officials to raise the money-laundering case against Burisma’s owner, Zlochevsky.109 Kent

 

102 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12, 2014),

https://web.archive.org/web/20140606004334/http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-the-team-of-burisma-holdings/.

103 Id.

104 Id.

105 Interfax-UKRAINE, Ukrainian president dismisses Makhnitsky as acting prosecutor general

(June 18, 2014), https://web.archive.org/web/20140714162034/http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/209973.html.

106Interfax-UKRAINE, MPs agree to Yarema's appointment as prosecutor general

(June 19, 2014), https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/210045.html.

107 Nicholas Fandos, Kenneth P. Vogel, and Michael D. Shear, Senior State Dept. Ukraine Expert Says White House Sidelined

Him, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Nov. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/us/politics/impeachment-george-kentstate.html; George Kent Testimony at 24 (emphasis added).

108 George Kent Testimony at 128.

109 George Kent Testimony at 128-29.
29

secured a Feb. 3, 2015,110 appointment with the First Deputy Prosecutor General, who was the

“number two prosecutor in the country at the time, Anatoliy Danylenko.”111 

Kent testified that, during the Feb. 3, 2015 meeting with the PGO, he “confronted the

First Deputy Prosecutor General, Anatoliy Danylenko, demanding to know who had paid the

bribe and how much it was. I also demanded that the case against Zlochevsky be

resumed.”112

During testimony, Kent provided the Committees additional insight into what occurred

during the Feb. 3, 2015, meeting at the PGO:

When I asked the question [to Danylenko], ‘How much was the

[Zlochevsky] bribe and who took it?’ [Danylenko] laughed and said,

‘That’s exactly what President Poroshenko asked us last week.’ And

I [Kent] said, ‘So what did you tell the President [Poroshenko]?’ and

[Danylenko] said, ‘Seven million dollars and last May [2014],

before we came into office.’113 

Kent apparently did not believe that Zlochevsky’s bribe occurred in May 2014. He

responded to Mr. Danylenko,

“Nice try, but the letter that someone—some prosecutor in your

office [PGO] wrote was signed in late December [2014], six

months after you all [Yarema’s team] came into office.”114

On Feb. 10, 2015, one week after Kent’s conversation with the PGO, President Poroshenko

dismissed General Prosecutor Yarema and other members of his team.

115

 

b. George Kent reporting of the Zlochevsky’s bribe allegation to U.S. officials

Kent told the Committees that after the meeting with Danylenko, the DOJ official at U.S.

Embassy Kyiv reported the allegation — that Zlochevsky paid the PGO a $7 million bribe — to

the FBI.116 At this time, the Committees are seeking an explanation from the FBI about what, if

any, actions they took after receiving this information from U.S. Embassy Kyiv. 

Kent testified that it was not until sometime after the Feb. 3, 2015, meeting with the PGO

that he became aware that Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma.117

 

110 George Kent Testimony at 20.

111 George Kent Testimony at 129.

112 George Kent Testimony at 20 (emphasis added).

113 George Kent Testimony at 130 (emphasis added).

114 Id. (emphasis added).

115 Id.

116 George Kent Testimony at 131.

117 George Kent Testimony at 16.
30

After Kent learned of the alleged Zlochevsky bribe, he became aware of Hunter Biden’s

connection to Burisma. Soon after, Kent spoke with Vice President Biden’s office about his

concerns. This conversation occurred sometime between Feb. 3 and Feb. 14, 2015, when Kent

ended up on a phone call with a staffer from Vice President Biden’s office.118 He could not

recall the exact date of the phone call,

119 and when asked whether he apprised the staffer for Vice

President Biden about Zlochevsky’s alleged bribe, Kent testified, “I can’t remember — to be

perfectly honest, I don’t remember who I spoke to.”120 Kent told the Committees he did not

memorialize this February 2015 phone call with Vice President Biden’s office.121

Despite not recalling whether he mentioned the alleged Zlochevsky bribe to Vice

President Biden’s office, or to a member of the Obama National Security Council, over the years,

Kent did mention his knowledge of the alleged Zlochevsky bribe to high-ranking State

Department officials. For example, on Aug. 31, 2016, Kent told State Department colleagues

that “[Zlochevsky] who almost certainly paid off the PGO in December 2014 (I had the then

First deputy PG Danylenko tell me the bribe was $7 million) to have the case against him closed

and his $23 million in assets frozen in the UK unfrozen?”122

c. Conclusion

Based on Kent’s testimony, the alleged $7 million bribe from Zlochevsky to Ukraine’s

PGO likely occurred while Hunter Biden was on Burisma’s board. Hunter Biden has stated that

his position on the board was to “consult on matters of transparency, corporate governance and

responsibility[.]”

123 The Committees requested information from the FBI about what, if any,

actions it took in regard to this allegation.124 The FBI has not yet responded to that request.

 

118 George Kent Testimony at 127.

119 Id.

120 George Kent Testimony at 129.

121 George Kent Testimony at 226.

122 Email from George Kent, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Deputy Mission Dir., U.S. Embassy Kyiv, et al., (Aug. 31, 2016, 9:55 PM),

[State-2019-18-0000398-399] (emphasis added).

123 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12, 2014),

https://web.archive.org/web/20140606004334/http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-the-team-of-burisma-holdings/.

124 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S, Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,

S. Comm. on Fin., to Hon. Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Dep’t of Justice. (Sep. 15, 2020).
31

VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A U.S. SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON

BURISMA’S BOARD

When Vice President Biden traveled overseas on Air Force Two, he was often

accompanied by members of his family.125 Hunter Biden joined his father on a number of trips

and, as the son of the vice president, he could enroll as a protectee and receive armed protection

from the U.S. Secret Service (USSS). In an effort to determine how much of Hunter Biden’s

scheduled travel occurred as a protectee and whether that overlapped with his private business

dealings, the Committees requested and received documents from the USSS detailing Hunter

Biden’s scheduled travel as a protectee.126 

The Committees found that Hunter Biden scheduled travel as a protectee after joining

Burisma’s board in May 2014.127 The Committees also determined that Hunter Biden declined

USSS protection after a scheduled July 8, 2014, trip to Michigan City, Ind.

128

 At this time, the

Committees have not determined why Hunter Biden declined USSS protection after July 8, 2014.

a. Hunter Biden, USSS protectee

According to USSS records, Hunter Biden enrolled as a protectee starting in January

2009, after his father was elected vice president.

129

 He remained a protectee for about 4.5 years,

and records indicate an extensive amount of scheduled foreign travel as a protectee. Although

the majority of his trips were domestic, the Committees identified nearly 70 trips that Hunter

Biden scheduled to foreign countries while he was a protectee.130 Hunter Biden, here identified

by the USSS using his full name, Robert H. Biden, scheduled foreign travel as a protectee to a

wide array of foreign cities:

Arrival Date Departure Date City/Country Protectee

6/14/2009 6/19/2009 Addis Ababa,

Ethiopia

Robert H. Biden

6/20/2009 6/22/2009 Mumbai, India Robert H. Biden

9/14/2009 9/17/2009 Buenos Aires,

Argentina

Robert H. Biden

 

125 Josh Lederman, Biden’s trip to China with son Hunter in 2013 comes under new scrutiny, NBC NEWS (Oct. 2, 2019),

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-s-trip-china-son-hunter-2013-comes-under-new-n1061051.

126 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S, Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,

S. Comm. on Fin., to Mr. James M. Murray, Director, U.S. Secret Serv., Dep’t of Homeland Sec. (Feb. 5, 2020); Letter from

Faron K. Paramore, Assistant Dir., U.S. Secret Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., to Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on

Homeland Sec. and Gov. Affairs, and Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin. (Apr. 6, 2020).

127 Protectee Visits Detail Reports for Robert H. Biden, U.S. Secret Serv., Date Range: January 1, 2008 - January 31, 2017. The

U.S. Secret Service cannot confirm that the trips occurred or if protection was provided for the entirety of the trip due to the age

of the records at issue.

128 Id.

129 Id.

130 Protectee Visits Detail Reports for Robert H. Biden, U.S. Secret Serv., Date Range: January 1, 2008 - January 31, 2017. The

U.S. Secret Service cannot confirm that the trips occurred or if protection was provided for the entirety of the trip due to the age

of the records at issue. The nearly 70 trips to foreign countries includes travel to cities within one foreign country. 
32

11/9/2009 11/12/2009 Madrid, Spain Robert H. Biden

5/5/2010 5/7/2010 Brussels, Belgium Robert H. Biden

8/9/2010 8/14/2010 Copenhagen,

Denmark

Robert H. Biden

8/15/2010 8/24/2010 Johannesburg, South

Africa

Robert H. Biden

4/16/2011 4/20/2011 Taipei, Taiwan Robert H. Biden

5/15/2011 5/16/2011 Monterrey, Mexico Robert H. Biden

10/19/2011 10/21/2011 Hong Kong Robert H. Biden

11/1/2011 11/4/2011 Bogota, Colombia Robert H. Biden

11/10/2011 11/14/2011 Abu Dhabi, UAE Robert H. Biden

2/15/2012 2/18/2012 Moscow, Russia Robert H. Biden

3/20/2013 3/22/2013 Dublin, Ireland Robert H. Biden

7/30/2013 8/1/2013 Milan, Italy Robert H. Biden

8/1/2013 8/6/2013 Florence, Italy Robert H. Biden

10/31/2013 11/5/2013 Abu Dhabi, UAE Robert H. Biden

12/2/2013 12/4/2013 Tokyo, Japan Robert H. Biden

12/5/2013 12/6/2013 Seoul, South Korea Robert H. Biden

12/6/2013 12/9/2013 Manila, Philippines Robert H. Biden

4/3/2014 4/6/2014 Lake Como, Italy Robert H. Biden

Joe Biden has been asked about his son, Hunter, joining him on foreign trips to China

while he was vice president.

131

 In response to questions about whether this arrangement was a

conflict of interest, Joe Biden has told the media, “I have never spoken to my son [Hunter] about

his overseas business dealings.”132 The USSS records indicate Hunter Biden scheduled at least

six trips to China while a protectee, including a trip to Beijing in May 2014 right before he

joined Burisma’s board:

Arrival Date Departure Date City/Country Protectee

 

131 Josh Lederman, Biden’s trip to China with son Hunter in 2013 comes under new scrutiny, NBC NEWS (Oct. 2, 2019),

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-s-trip-china-son-hunter-2013-comes-under-new-n1061051.

132 Id.
33

4/6/2010 4/9/2010 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden

4/20/2011 4/22/2011 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden

6/13/2013 6/14/2013 Shanghai, China Robert H. Biden

6/14/2013 6/15/2013 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden

12/4/2013 12/5/2013 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden

5/7/2014 5/8/2014 Beijing, China Robert H. Biden

During his December 2013 trip to China, during which Hunter Biden flew on Air Force Two,

Hunter Biden admitted he met with a Chinese banker.133 According to news reports, Hunter

Biden appeared to be conducting his own private business during this specific trip and was

working to secure a deal in the hopes of creating a Chinese equity fund.134 

b. Hunter Biden, USSS protectee and Burisma board member.

According to USSS records, Hunter Biden was a protectee at the time he joined

Burisma’s board in May 2014.135 Hunter Biden scheduled at least seven trips after he joined

Burisma’s board on May 13, 2014.136 These trips took him to the foreign cities of Doha, Qatar,

and Paris, France, and stateside to New York, Newark, N.J., and Michigan City, Ind.:

137

 

Arrival Date Departure Date City/Country Protectee

5/11/2014 5/14/2014 Doha, Qatar Robert H. Biden

5/27/2014 5/28/2014 New York, NY, USA Robert H. Biden

5/28/2014 5/28/2014 Newark, NJ, USA Robert H. Biden

5/29/2014 5/30/2014 Paris, France Robert H. Biden

6/7/2014 6/10/2014 Paris, France Robert H. Biden

6/21/2014 6/27/2014 Mich. City, IN, USA Robert H. Biden

6/29/2014 7/8/2014 Mich. City, IN, USA Robert H. Biden

 

133 Id.

134 Id.

135 Protectee Visits Detail Reports for Robert H. Biden, U.S. Secret Serv., Date Range: January 1, 2008 - January 31, 2017. The

U.S. Secret Service cannot confirm that the trips occurred or if protection was provided for the entirety of the trip due to the age

of the records at issue.

136 Id.

137 Id.
34

The Committees did not determine why Hunter Biden declined USSS protection

following the July 8, 2014, trip in Michigan City. But it should be noted that, the day before his

last trip as a protectee, Time published an article describing Burisma’s ramped up lobbying

efforts to U.S. officials and Hunter’s involvement in Burisma’s board.

138

 The Committees

requested additional information from the USSS about the lack of records after July 8, 2014. 

The USSS did not provide greater detail other than Hunter Biden declined protection.

c. Conclusion

Hunter Biden scheduled hundreds of trips while he was a protectee. He was a Burisma

board member while a protectee. Whether Hunter Biden conducted additional private business

dealings while a protectee is unknown. Further, the Committees do not know why Hunter Biden

declined USSS protection, and whether or not media scrutiny was a factor for Hunter to decline

protection in July 2014.

 

138 Michael Scherer, Ukranian Employer of Joe Biden’s Son Hires a D.C. Lobbyist, TIME (Jul. 7, 2014).

https://time.com/2964493/ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-burisma/.
35

IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING

FIRM HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER

UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO.

a. Introduction

Despite claims from Ranking Member Peters, Ranking Member Wyden and Democrat

leadership, the Committees reject all assertions that this investigation has been influenced by

Russian disinformation. To be crystal clear, the Committees’ work has focused only on Obama

administration records from the State Department, National Archives and Records

Administration, Department of Justice, other federal agencies, and the U.S. consulting firm Blue

Star Strategies, as well as interviews with current and former U.S. government officials. The

Committees have spoken with one foreign national about his ties to the Obama administration, a

DNC operative, and Blue Star Strategies. 

In 2016, Andrii Telizhenko was an official at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington.139 

In that position, Telizhenko met several times with Obama administration officials, a consultant

for the Democratic National Committee,140 and the Democrat lobbying firm, Blue Star Strategies

(which later employed him from 2016 to 2017). Blue Star Strategies officials continued to

contact and request his assistance as recently as the summer of 2019.

b. Communication and meetings between Obama administration officials and

Telizhenko.

As far as the Committees are aware, the majority of Telizhenko’s interactions with

Obama administration officials occurred during 2015 and 2016. The Committees possess

records of some of these communications from their request to the National Archives.141 

According to documents, on July 19, 2013, Telizhenko attended a meeting at the White

House with two other Ukrainians to meet with Lyn Debevoise.142 At that time, Telizhenko was

the counselor to a deputy of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s Parliament.143 It is unknown what

was discussed at this meeting. 

 

139 The Committees attempted to obtain Telizhenko’s Blue Star Strategies documents that are subject to a non-disclosure

agreement, but Democrat obstruction shielded Blue Star Strategies from providing these relevant documents.

140 Kenneth Vogel and David Stern, Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire, Politico (Jan. 11, 2017).

141 Letter from Ron Johnson, Chairman, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff., and Charles Grassley, Chairman,

S. Comm. on Fin., to Hon. David S. Ferriero, Archivist, Nat’l Archives and Records Admin, (Nov. 21, 2019). 

142 Email from Waves Request, U.S. Secret Serv. to Marisa Donelson (Jul. 11, 2013, 1:18 PM), [000064].

143 Email from Andrii Telizhenko, Counsellor to the Deputy of Verhovna Rada, to Lyn Debevoise (Aug. 5, 2013, 8:39 AM),

[000217].
36

On July 21, 2015, Telizhenko was scheduled to meet in the Old Executive Office

Building with Michael Carpenter,144 who was a foreign policy advisor to Vice President

Biden.145 It is unknown what was discussed at this meeting.

c. January 2016 Ukrainian delegation visit to Obama’s White House.

Telizhenko’s interactions with Obama administration officials became more frequent

starting in January 2016. According to a document with a DOJ logo, a Ukrainian delegation that

included senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors arrived in Washington on Jan. 18, 2016. The agenda

shows that their first official meeting was confirmed for Jan. 19, 2016, at the White House, from

11 a.m. to noon with “Eric Ciaramella, Elizabeth [sic] Zentos and others TBD, National Security

Council.”

146

 

144 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Frances Castro (Jul. 21, 2015, 10:01 AM), [000140].

145 Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy & Global Engagement, Michael Carpenter, https://global.upenn.edu/penn-bidencenter/person/michael-carpenter. Michael Carpenter served in the White House as a foreign policy advisor to Vice President Joe

Biden as well as on the National Security Council as Director for Russia.

146 Email from Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council, to Catherine Croft, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 19, 2016, 7:26 PM), [001753]

(attaching Agenda for Examination of the U.S. Adversarial Criminal Justice System for senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors (Jan.

18, 2016 to Jan. 23, 2016), [001755]).
37

In the middle of the night on Jan. 19, 2016, Telizhenko contacted Elisabeth Zentos, a member of

the Obama administration’s National Security Council (NSC) asking to join the NSC-Ukrainian

delegation meeting scheduled at 11 a.m. that morning.

147

 It is not known if Zentos responded to

Telizhenko’s email, but she did forward Telizhenko’s request to her colleague on the NSC, Eric

Ciaramella, after the Jan. 19, 2016, meeting.148 According to Telizhenko’s email to Zentos,

Artem Sytnyk, Nazar Kholodnickiy, and David Sakvarelidze, among others, were listed as

participants in the meeting with the NSC.149

 

147 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 12:22 AM), [000074].

148 Email from Elisabeth Zentos, National Security Council to Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 9:42 PM),

[000074].

149 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Jan. 19, 2016, 12:22 AM), [000074]. 
38

Over the next two days, Jan. 20-21, 2016, the Ukrainian delegation was scheduled to

meet with a slew of U.S. officials, including representatives of the DOJ Office of the Inspector

General, the DOJ, the FBI and the Department of State.150 

At this time, the Committees have not confirmed whether all the scheduled meeting

entries on the agenda occurred. Further, despite the Committees’ efforts, no U.S. officials have

confirmed what was discussed at any of these January 2016 meetings with the senior-level

Ukrainian prosecutors.151

d. Interactions between Obama NSC official Elisabeth Zentos and Andrii Telizhenko.

The Committees interviewed Zentos and during that interview discussed her interactions

with Telizhenko. Zentos testified that she didn’t “remember exactly when [she] first

communicated with [Telizhenko], but [she] believe[s] it was while [she] was working at the U.S.

Embassy in Kyiv, so it would have been between 2012 and 2014.”152 Zentos was less

cooperative than any other witness the Committees interviewed. She refused to provide the

 

150 Email from Eric Ciaramella, Nat’l Sec. Council, to Catherine Croft, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 19, 2016, 7:26 PM), [001753]

(attaching Agenda for Examination of the U.S. Adversarial Criminal Justice System for senior-level Ukrainian prosecutors (Jan.

18, 2016 to Jan. 23, 2016), [001755-001756]).

151Transcript of Interview at 174-75, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of

Elisabeth Zentos (July 20, 2020), [Hereinafter Elisabeth Zentos Testimony]. 

152 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony 182.
39

names of officials to whom she directly reported, nor would she name individuals who reported

to her, either at the NSC or the State Department.153 

In relation to her meetings and communications with Telizhenko, starting in January

2016, Zentos testified that she met and communicated with Telizhenko as “he was a

representative of the Ukrainian Government. Part of my job was to be in touch with the

Ukrainian Government.”154 During the spring of 2016, records indicate, Zentos and Telizhenko

would meet at coffee shops, among other venues, around Washington, and they met at least one

time while in Ukraine. Overall, records indicate that they would meet a number of times during

the first half of 2016. For example, on Feb. 9, 2016, less than a month after the White House

meeting, Zentos and Telizhenko met at Cosi in Washington.155 It is not known what was

discussed at this meeting. In addition, on Feb. 23, 2016, Telizhenko and Zentos emailed about

meeting. In her reply, Zentos asked, “Ok if I bring my colleague Eric, who works on Ukraine

with me?” She ended the email by asking, “[D]id you get Trump’s autograph for me?”

156

 

153 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 34 and 38.

154 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 187.

155 Email from Andrii Telizhenko to Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Feb. 9, 2016, 2:07 PM), [000021]. 

156 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Feb. 23, 2016), [000058].
40

On March 1, 2016, Zentos and Telizhenko agreed over email to meet on March 3, 2016, at a

Washington bar called The Exchange. Before the planned meeting, Zentos told Telizhenko, “I’ll

see if my colleague Eric is up for joining.” When asked whether “Eric” was Ciaramella, Zentos

declined to answer. This meeting ultimately occurred on March 4, 2016, but it is unclear what

was discussed.

157

Additional meetings between Zentos and Telizhenko included:

 March 4, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko met at Swing’s coffee house in Washington.

158

Telizhenko emailed Zentos after the meeting and discussed how an individual was

seeking a meeting with Obama NSC official Charles Kupchan. 

 

157 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Mar. 1, 2016), [000113-000114].

158 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 4, 2016), [000018-000019].
41

 March 10, 2016: Telizhenko emailed Zentos asking to meet that afternoon for five

minutes. Based on the email, it appears they met at 5 p.m. that day at Cosi.159 Despite

this email, Zentos testified, “I do not remember if this occurred. As you can probably see

from the email, Mr. Telizhenko likes to ask me to meet. I don’t remember if this specific

meeting happened.”160

 April 13, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko apparently met.161 When asked about this

meeting, Zentos testified, “I do not recall when any specific meeting was with Mr.

Telizhenko.”162 Zentos said this despite her own email to Telizhenko saying, “No

worries! Just got here. See you soon.”163

 May 4, 2016: Zentos and Telizhenko apparently met.164

 July 9, 2016: Zentos emailed Telizhenko suggesting they meet. The email suggested

that Zentos was in Ukraine at this time, and Zentos testified that she joined Secretary

Kerry’s delegation to Ukraine around this time.

165

 Zentos does not recall if she met

Telizhenko while she was in Ukraine despite emails indicating she planned to see

Telizhenko and he was “downstairs in the lobby” on the next day.166

 

159 Emails between Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council, and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 10, 2016), [000043-000045].

160 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 193.

161 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (Apr. 13, 2016), [000161].

162 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 195.

163 Id.

164 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (May 4, 2016), [000109-000111].

165 Elisabeth Zentos Testimony at 198.

166 Emails between Andrii Telizhenko and Elisabeth Zentos, Nat’l Sec. Council (July 9, 2016), [000275-000276].
42

e. Blue Star Strategies’ relationship with Andrii Telizhenko.

Burisma hired Blue Star Strategies, a Democrat lobbying firm, in November 2015.167 Blue

Star was founded by Chief Executive Officer Karen Tramontano and Chief Operating Officer

Sally Painter. Both Tramontano and Painter interacted with Telizhenko when he was an official

at the Ukraine embassy, and Blue Star eventually employed Telizhenko starting in July 2016.168 

Telizhenko’s contract with Blue Star overlapped with the firm’s representation of Burisma.169 

Blue Star refused to provide Telizhenko’s documents from his time as a contractor to the

Committees, and it refused the Committees’ request to release Telizhenko from his nondisclosure agreement. 

 

167 Transcript of Interview at 17, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Karen

Tramontano (Aug. 28, 2020). [Hereinafter Karen Tramontano Testimony]. 

168

 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 57.

169 Transcript of Interview at 151, S. Comm. on Fin. and S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. Interview of Sally

Painter (Aug. 31, 2020). [Hereinafter Sally Painter Testimony].
43

March 2016 was a pivotal month for Blue Star and its work for Burisma. In response to

calls for his termination by then-Vice President Biden, Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was

about to be removed, and Blue Star increased its outreach to, and meetings with, both U.S.

officials and Ukrainian officials.

170

 On March 21, 2016, a Blue Star employee emailed State

Department official Amos Hochstein to request a meeting with CEO Tramontano, COO Painter,

and John Buretta, a private attorney, to discuss “a sensitive energy matter ahead of [Ukraine]

President Poroshenko’s upcoming visit to DC next week.”

171

 

The next day, on March 22, 2016, Vice President Biden called President Poroshenko

about U.S. loan guarantees.172

As Blue Star officials waited for a response from Hochstein, they met with Ukrainian

officials. Specifically, Tramontano testified that she and Painter met with Ukrainian officials on

March 22, 2016 at the Ukraine embassy.

173

 Telizhenko joined this meeting, and Tramontano

testified that Burisma was a topic of discussion:

Question: So at this point in this discussion you referenced with Mr. Telizhenko, you

had not brought up Burisma specifically?

Tramontano: Oh. No, we had — I’m sorry. To be clear, yes, we had brought up

Burisma, and my — we did not bring up, you know, specific cases that

were pending.

Question: I understand. And did you just bring up Burisma to Mr. Telizhenko, or did

this come up in your meeting with Ms. [Oksana] Shulyar?

Tramontano: It came up in our meeting [March 22, 2016] with Ms. Shulyar that

Mr. Telizhenko attended. We had the meeting to inform them of the

clients we had, including Burisma, and the meetings that we were seeking. 

So, yes, it [Burisma] came up in that discussion.

174

 

170 Tramontano told the Committees that Blue Star Strategies engaged in “government relations assistance” for Burisma. Oddly,

Painter said the exact opposite. See, Karen Tramontano Testimony at 39; Sally Painter Testimony at 39. Moreover, when

questioned whether Blue Star Strategies engaged in “government relations assistance” in Ukraine on behalf of Burisma, Painter

implied that it did: “I mean, we were engaging with the government, yes.” Sally Painter Testimony at 40. In addition, both

Tramontano and Painter denied that they lobbied the U.S. Government on behalf of Burisma and denied that they intended to

influence U.S. policy with respect to Burisma; however, that testimony is contradicted by Amos Hochstein’s. See Karen

Tramontano Testimony at 48 (“We didn’t lobby the U.S. government.”) and 49 (“In our representation of Burisma, we did not try

to influence U.S. policy with respect to Ukraine.”) and Sally Painter Testimony at 43 (Question: “When meeting with U.S.

government officials, did you intend to influence U.S. policy towards Burisma?” Answer: “No.”) and 167 (“I do not consider

them to be lobbying. I consider that to be exploring to understand the position of the U.S. government.”) compared to Amos

Hochstein’s Testimony at 138 (“They did not like my answer, and they tried to convince me otherwise.”).

171Email from Sean Keeley, Blue Star Strategies, to Amos Hochstein, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Mar. 21, 2016), [STATE-2019-18-

0001124].

172 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Readout of Vice President Biden’s Call with President Petro

Poroshenko of Ukraine (Mar. 22, 2016), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/03/22/readout-vicepresident-bidens-call-president-petro-poroshenko-ukraine.

173 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 123.

174 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 124-25 (emphasis added).
44

According to documents, after their meeting at the Ukraine embassy, Tramontano replied

to Telizhenko, asking him about scheduling a meeting with the Prosecutor General for

Ukraine.175 Her email also informed Telizhenko that Buretta, an attorney and former DOJ

official, planned to be in Ukraine for a day.176 

Additionally, the day after their meeting, Painter sent Shulyar and Telizhenko an email

with the subject line: “Many Thanks.” Painter’s March 23, 2016, email noted, “As Karen said,

please think of us as an extension of your team. We are available to be helpful in any way.”177 

Further, Painter said that Blue Star was working with “Morgan Williams on their piece of the

[Ukrainian] President’s visit and would be honored to help set up something for Mr. Lozhkin178

with Denis McDonough, the President’s Chief of Staff, or with anyone else he is interested in

meeting.”179 Blue Star did not produce these company records to the Committees; instead, the

Committees received them from Telizhenko.

180

 

175 Karen Tramontano Testimony at Exhibit 9. 

176 Id.

177 Email from Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, to Oksana Shulyar and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 23, 2016).

178 “Mr. Lozhkin” most likely refers to Boris Lozhkin who served as the Head of the Presidential Administration for Ukraine

from June 2014 to August 2016. See World Jewish Congress, Boris Lozhkin, https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/bio/borislozhkin.

179 Email from Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, to Oksana Shulyar and Andrii Telizhenko (Mar. 23, 2016).

180 Id.
45

On March 24, 2016 — three days after Blue Star requested a meeting to “discuss a

sensitive energy matter” and two days after meeting with Telizhenko and Shulyar —Painter and

Buretta met with Hochstein at the State Department.181 According to Painter, during this March

2016 meeting with Hochstein, she provided him a summary of Blue Star’s December 2015

meeting with Ambassador Pyatt.182 She also told the Committees that Buretta provided

Hochstein a briefing on the U.K. court case.

183 Hochstein testified that he decided to meet with

Blue Star officials, “Because until that meeting I was still under the impression from the first

meeting that they were looking to conduct a report. I was – I didn’t have an issue with meeting

with them again and hearing where they were in their process.”184 He did not recall Blue Star

providing him a report but they gave him a verbal view of where they stood and they also tried to

“convince” him to change his position.

185

 

 

181 Email from Redacted, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Amos Hochstein, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Mar. 22, 2016, 10:43:00 -0400), [STATE2019-18-0001125].

182 Sally Painter Testimony at 116.

183 Sally Painter Testimony at 117.

184 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 131-32.

185 Amos Hochstein Testimony at 132-33, 138.
46

f. Blue Star takes Telizhenko’s recommendation to remove Burisma’s name to secure

a June 2016 meeting with the PGO.

While strategizing about how to secure a June 2016 meeting with Ukraine’s Prosecutor

General’s Office, Blue Star officials and Telizhenko discussed how they should craft the meeting

request to the PGO. Blue Star sought this meeting to discuss the ongoing PGO cases against

Burisma and Zlochevsky. On June 7, 2016, Telizhenko offered his advice in an email to

Tramontano:

I wanted to recommend to, in the official request letter, to take away

Mr. Zlochevsky’s company name and his name. Just request a

meeting an [sic] put just the topics you wanted to discuss, expect

[sic] Zlochevsky. I will brief you more when you come to Kiev, but

because the President [Poroshenko] does not really like Zlochevsky

(he has personal issues), Mr. Lutsenko will deny the meeting if his

name stays in the letter. You can raise the issue during the meeting,

but on the official letters I would recommend to remove it. I spoke

to the chief of staff. He is ready to meet, but please take off the name

of the company and his name.186

On June 10, 2016, Tramontano replied to Telizhenko, saying, “Thank you for your assistance. I

hope you received the revised letter.”187 

Tramontano testified that some of Telizhenko’s recommendations were adopted:188

Question: Did Blue Star make the changes to the letter that was sent to the

Prosecutor General that Mr. Telizhenko recommended?

Tramontano: John Buretta made the changes.

Question: And what changes did Mr. Buretta make?

 

186 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 136-37.

187 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 139.

188 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 139-140.
47

Tramontano: As I recall, and I believe this document is in the submission, he changed

the agenda items to take the name of the company [Burisma] off the

agenda items.

189

On June 22, 2016, Tramontano, Buretta and Burisma’s Vadym Pozharskiy met with Prosecutor

General Lutsenko.190

g. Blue Star official communicates with Telizhenko in 2019.

Blue Star’s contract with Telizhenko ended in May 2017, yet Blue Star officials

continued to communicate with Telizhenko.

Tramontano testified that after ending the contract with Telizhenko, “we remained in

contact, I would say, you know, from time to time. When he came to Washington, he would, you

know, let us know. But I haven’t talked to him in quite some time, I would say.”

191

 When asked

if this was the same for Painter, Tramontano replied, “I would think it’s the same.”

192

 Further,

when Tramontano was asked whether Painter communicated more with Telizhenko, she

responded, “I don’t even know how to answer that question. I’m sorry[.]”

193

When the Committees interviewed Painter, she explained how she communicated with

Telizhenko:

Question: How did you communicate with Mr. Telizhenko?

Painter: We communicated by email and on the telephone.

Question: By telephone, you mean phone calls?

Painter: Yes.194

At that point of the interview, Painter failed to mention that she communicated via WhatsApp

with Telizhenko.195 The Committees have obtained some images of WhatsApp messages

between Painter (white colored boxes) and Telizhenko (green colored boxes) starting in April

2019 and ending in August 2019. These texts show that Blue Star and Telizhenko maintained

consistent contact even after he left their employment and that Blue Star continued to rely on his

advice.

 

189 Id. (emphasis added).

190 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 140. 

191 Karen Tramontano Testimony at 161.

192 Id.

193 Id.

194 Sally Painter Testimony at 150.

195 Sally Painter failed to produce any WhatsApp communications to the Committees, and the communications were provide by

Andrii Telizhenko.
48

Messages exchanged between Sally Painter (white background) and

Andrii Telizhenko (green background)196

 

196 WhatsApp messages between Sally Painter, Blue Star Strategies, and Andrii Telizhenko (on file with Comms.).
49

Messages exchanged between Sally Painter (white background) and

Andrii Telizhenko (green background)197

 

197 Id.
50

Messages exchanged between Sally Painter (white background) and

Andrii Telizhenko (green background)198

 

198 Id.
51

Messages exchanged between Sally Painter (white background) and

Andrii Telizhenko (green background)199

 

199 Id.
52

When the Committees presented these WhatsApp messages to Painter, she confirmed that these

messages were authentic: 

Question: Did you text with Andrii Telizhenko?

Painter: I believe so, yes.

Question: Do these appear to be messages between yourself and Mr.

Telizhenko?

Painter: Yes.

Question: How often do you text with Mr. Telizhenko?

Painter: I can't quantify. I don't recall the number.200

Painter did not provide these WhatsApp messages to the Committees despite repeated requests. 

When asked whether she still possessed these messages with Telizhenko, Painter testified, “I do

not keep my WhatsApp messages.” And when questioned why she doesn’t keep the messages,

Painter said, “I like to get rid of them. It makes me know that I finished a task. So I get rid

of my texts and my WhatsApp and any of my traffic like that. I like to have a clean file.”201

When asked why she was communicating with Telizhenko in July 2019, Painter testified,

“We had a fine rapport, and he would communicate with me periodically.”

202

According to these messages, on April 30, 2019, Painter told Telizhenko to “please Take

[sic] blue star off resume.” The Committees asked Painter about this message:

Question: It sounds like you're ordering him to do that [Remove Blue Star from his

resume]. No?

Painter: As I stated before — this will be the third time — Mr. Telizhenko was

working more and more with Mr. Giuliani, and we had a conversation

about whether it would hurt him with the Republicans if he had Blue Star

on his résumé. So this is not a characterization of our conversation.

Question: So is that connected to the message you sent above on April 26, 2019, that

says, “Have you seen what Solomon has written about what you said?”

Painter: I don't think the — I can't comment on that because I don't think this is an

accurate representation of the chain of events.

 

200 Sally Painter Testimony at 153-54 (emphasis added).

201 Sally Painter Testimony at 157 (emphasis added).

202 Sally Painter Testimony at 158 (emphasis added).
53

Question: So you’re advising Mr. Telizhenko how to better work with Rudy Giuliani

and Republicans?

Painter: Ironically, Mr. Telizhenko was asking my advice.203

In another message, on June 18, 2019, Painter messaged Telizhenko, “Complaint filed.” The

Committees asked Painter about this message and she explained:

Question: On June 18th, 2019, you wrote “Complaint filed.” What is this reference

to?

Painter: I don't recall.

Question: You have no recollection?

Painter: I do not.

Question: Why would you have to tell Mr. Telizhenko that a complaint was filed?

Painter: I don't recall.204

h. Conclusion

The Obama administration and the Democrat lobby shop Blue Star Strategies had

consistent and extensive contact with Andrii Telizhenko over a period of years. Yet despite

these well-documented contacts with Democratic officials, Democrats have attempted to impugn

this investigation for having received some Blue Star-related records from him. Some

Democrats have even (incorrectly) identified Telizhenko as the Committees’ “star witness.”205 

Although he produced a small number of Blue Star-related records to the Committees, the

Committees never interviewed him as part of this investigation.206 Nonetheless, Democrats have

claimed that Telizhenko is involved in a Russian disinformation campaign. Even though almost

all of the Committees’ records are from U.S. agencies and U.S. officials or persons, Democrats

have repeatedly misconstrued the facts of this investigation. In doing so, they conveniently have

ignored their own long history of meeting with Telizhenko and his year-long work for a

Democrat lobby shop. If Democrats are concerned that Telizhenko presents any risk of

advancing disinformation, it is notable that the Ranking Members have not expressed any

curiosity about his work with the Obama administration or Blue Star Strategies.

 

203 Sally Painter Testimony at 161.

204 Sally Painter Testimony at 156.

205Ranking Member Ron Wyden, Wyden Takes to Senate Floor to Address Russian Disinformation in Flawed Congressional

Investigation, 2020 Election (Sept. 16, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/wyden-takes-to-senate-floor-to-address-russiandisinformation-in-flawed-congressional-investigation-2020-election.

206 The Committees received a small number of records from Telizhenko related to his communications with and subsequent

work for Blue Star Strategies. Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden have access to these records but have

refused to receive or review them. Had they done so, they would have observed that the State Department, National Archives,

and Blue Star Strategies (after it received a subpoena) produced most of the same records to the Committees. They also would

have noticed the emails and text messages that Blue Star failed to produce to the Committees. 
54
55

X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A

RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO

INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.

a. Introduction

Since the majority began its investigation, the Ranking Members have attempted to

mischaracterize its scope in an effort to cast doubt on its eventual findings. They have done so,

in part, by spreading an unfounded conspiracy theory rooted in a foreign-sourced influence

campaign publicly identified by the Intelligence Community (IC).207 Specifically, Democrats,

not just the Ranking Members, relied upon materials and statements from foreign nationals who

are attempting to influence U.S. politics to levy unsupported and demonstrably inaccurate

allegations linking the majority’s investigation to those same unreliable foreign nationals.

As part of their efforts, Democrats laundered their unclassified speculation through

classified analysis of intelligence reporting to fabricate a veneer of credibility in an effort to

shield their claims from public scrutiny. Those false claims were then leaked to friendly media

outlets, which reported them as fact. Together, these networks of Democratic offices and liberal

press outlets have worked to weave fact with fiction in order to construct a false narrative

designed to undercut and discredit the Chairmen’s investigation and its eventual findings. In the

process, Democrats relied upon and disseminated disinformation from foreign sources, such as

Ukrainian official Andriy Derkach, whom the IC has publicly warned are actively seeking to

influence U.S. politics.208 Thus the Democrats, specifically the Ranking Members, have engaged

in a disinformation campaign, not Chairmen Grassley or Johnson.

b. Beginnings of the investigation, early leaks, and unequal information sharing

On Nov. 15, 2019, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson wrote a non-public letter to

the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), seeking

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) on individuals and entities, including Hunter Biden,

Burisma Holdings (Burisma), and others. Although most of the letters sent during the

investigation have been released to the public shortly after being transmitted, this letter was not

released at the time because of the sensitive nature of the underlying records and the need to

ensure the integrity of the investigation with respect to those records. SARs often contain

evidence of potential criminal activities, such as money laundering and fraud, and at the time,

there was no evidence that SARs existed for the individuals mentioned in the request.209 The

letter was, however, shared with Ranking Member Peters’ office. Just one week later, on Nov.

 

207 See Press Release, Off. of the Dir. of Nat’l Intelligence, Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat

Update for the American Public (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2139-statementby-ncsc-director-william-evanina-election-threat-update-for-the-american-public; see also, Opening Statement of Joshua FlynnBrown, Deputy Chief Investigative Counsel for Chairman Grassley (Sept. 17, 2020).

208 See id.

209 See Off. of the Comptroller of the Currency, Suspicious Activity Reports (2013),

https://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/supervision-and-examination/bank-operations/financial-crime/suspicious-activity-reports/indexsuspicious-activity-reports.html.
56

22, 2019, a copy of the letter was leaked to Reuters, which published an article containing a link

to a full and unredacted copy of the letter.210 According to the Treasury, the department’s

protocol requires stamping the document, which the leaked version did not contain. 

The next major leak came in February 2020, just one day after the Committees sent a

public letter to the Secret Service requesting Hunter Biden’s travel records.211 The Committees

had requested the travel records in order to assess claims that Hunter Biden may have used

government-sponsored travel to conduct private business. The leaks were unrelated to the Secret

Service letter but they were designed to undermine the Treasury request. For example, these

disclosures to the media included the fact that the Treasury had been producing information

responsive to the Committees’ requests as well as the approximate date when the Treasury had

begun its production to the Committees.212 The Yahoo News article also stated, “[t]he senators’

requests to the Treasury have borne fruit, according to the ranking Democratic senator on the

Finance Committee, Ron Wyden of Oregon[.]”

213

 Senator Wyden’s spokesperson was also

quoted as saying, “the Treasury Department [is] rapidly complying with Senate Republican

requests — no subpoenas necessary — and producing ‘evidence’ of questionable origin.”

214

 The

Yahoo News article stated that the Department of Treasury had “complied with Republican

senators’ requests for highly sensitive and closely held financial records about Hunter Biden and

his associates[.]”

215

 Further, on the same day the Yahoo News article published, Buzzfeed News

reported that the Committees had begun coordinating interviews with potential witnesses.216

Contrary to the allegation that the Chairmen have not included the Ranking Members in

the Chairmen’s investigation, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters are not a

party to the majority’s investigation. However, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson have

included them in all document productions and interviews even though the Ranking Members

have failed to abide by the same principles of inclusion with respect to their investigations.217 As

one example, on July 1, 2020, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters released a

COVID-19 report that included non-public government information that was not shared with

 

210 See Richard Cowan and Valerie Volcovici, U.S. Republican Senators ask Treasury for any Reports on Hunter Biden, REUTERS

(Nov. 22, 2019), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-biden/u-s-republican-senators-ask-treasury-forsuspicious-activity-reports-on-hunter-biden-idUSKBN1XW254.

211 See Letter from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and

Governmental Aff., to U.S. Secret Serv. (Feb. 5, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2020-02-

05%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20Secret%20Service%20%28Biden%20Travel%29.pdf; see also Emma Loop, Here’s What’s

Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation; Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury

Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),

https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senate-inquiry161846826.html.

212 See id.

213 Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO NEWS

(Feb. 6, 2020), https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senate-inquiry161846826.html.

214 Id.

215 Id.

216 Emma Loop, Here’s What’s Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation.

217 Email correspondences between Majority and Minority Staff (on file with Comms.).
57

Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson or their staff.218 The Ranking Members failed to

include the Chairmen and their staff in all document production requests related to this review.219 

Moreover, Ranking Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters provided Chairmen’s staff

with a draft of this report that totaled 30 pages in length and represented that it was the final

version, to be publicly released.220 Days later, the Ranking Members made public the “final”

report, which was 98 pages in length, not the 30 pages that was represented to the Chairmen and

their staff.221 

As another example, Ranking Member Wyden conducted a year-long investigation into

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Seema Verma with the House

Committee on Energy and Commerce, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the

minority on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. On Sept. 9, 2020,

at 6:16 p.m., Ranking Member Wyden’s staff notified Chairman Grassley’s staff that the report

would be issued the following morning.222 Ranking Member Wyden’s staff did not include

Chairman Grassley’s staff in any document productions, witness interviews, report drafts, or

communications relating to that investigation. 

Further, the Ranking Members have repeatedly made public previously undisclosed and

non-public information pertaining to the majority’s investigation. On Feb. 11, May 6, and July

7, 2020, Ranking Member Wyden used the majority’s investigation to request sensitive materials

from the State Department relating to Ukraine.223 In doing so, the May 6 and July 7 letters also

made unauthorized releases of previously non-public information, including details regarding the

number of documents produced by the State Department in response to Committees’ requests,

information which they would not have known if they were not included in the document

productions.224 News outlets used that information to report that the administration was

responding to the Chairmen’s requests with unusual speed, which was false.225

 

Moreover, staff for the Chairmen and Ranking Members had a phone call with Victoria

Nuland’s attorneys on Aug. 29, 2020. During the course of that phone call, staff for Ranking

 

218 See Press Release, Spec. Comm. on Aging, Casey, Peters, Wyden Release New Report Detailing Trump Administration’s

Failure to Protect Nursing Home Residents and Workers From COVID-19 (July 1, 2020), https://www.aging.senate.gov/pressreleases/casey-peters-wyden-release-new-report-detailing-trump-administrations-failure-to-protect-nursing-home-residents-andworkers-from-covid-19-.

219 Email correspondences between Majority and Minority Staff (on file with Comms.).

220 Id. (on file with Comms.).

221 See S. Rep., COVID-19 IN NURSING HOMES How the Trump Administration Failed Residents and Workers, Spec. Comm.

on Aging (July 2020), https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/COVID19%20in%20Nursing%20Homes%20Final%20Report.pdf.

222 Email correspondences between Majority and Minority Staff (on file with Comms.).

223 See Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (Feb. 11, 2020),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/021120%20Wyden%20Letter%20to%20Mike%20Pompeo%20RE%20Ukraine%

20Follow%20Up.pdf; Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 6, 2020),

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883366-Wyden-to-Pompeo-05-06-2020.html; Letter from Ranking Member Ron

Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (July 7, 2020),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/070720%20Wyden%20to%20Pompeo%20Third%20Ukraine%20Request.pdf.

224 See id.

225 See Luppe B. Luppen, Treasury Department Sent Information on Hunter Biden to Expanding GOP Senate Inquiry, YAHOO

NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020), https://news.yahoo.com/treasury-department-sent-information-on-hunter-biden-to-expanding-gop-senateinquiry-161846826.html.
58

Member Wyden attempted to disclose to Nuland’s counsel the transcribed testimony of another

witness. The Chairmen’s staff immediately interceded to stop the communication and made

clear that such a disclosure would negatively affect the integrity of the investigation. In addition,

the Ranking Members’ staff have had contact with counsel for the witnesses without the

Chairmen’s staff present; in the context of an investigation conducted by only the Chairmen and

opposed by the Ranking Members, this unilateral contact raises concerns about any

communications, purposeful or inadvertent, that might harm the integrity of the investigation. 

House Democrats have also tried to involve themselves in this inquiry. On May 21,

2020, Representative Eliot Engel, who serves as Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign

Affairs, wrote to the State Department to request that the documents provided to the Senate

Committees be provided to his committee as well.226 (Of course, Ranking Member Wyden and

Ranking Member Peters received contemporaneous productions of all records provided to the

Committees.) Citing Ranking Member Wyden, Chairman Engel did not request the materials in

connection with any investigation of his own.227 Instead, he merely requested all records that

have been produced to the Committees.228 His inadequately predicated request appears to be

another effort to gather information for the purpose of running political interference. Further,

Chairman Engel has subpoenaed records and, in an attempt to strong-arm Secretary Pompeo into

turning over documents, has threatened to initiate contempt proceedings against him.229 Based

on communications with the State Department, Chairman Engel’s actions have directly interfered

with the State Department producing records to the Chairmen. On Sept. 18, 2020, the State

Department provided copies of records produced to the Committees to Chairman Engel without

providing any prior notice to the Chairmen.

c. Conspiracy theory claims

On July 13, 2020, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator Mark Warner, Speaker

Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff sent a letter, with a classified attachment, to the

FBI to express a purported belief that Congress is the subject of a foreign disinformation

campaign.230 In that letter, which was publicly released on July 20, 2020, they requested a

defensive briefing on foreign efforts to interfere in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.231 The

classified attachment included unclassified elements that, among other things, attempted — and

failed — to tie the joint Committees’ investigation to foreign disinformation. 

 

226 Letter from Chairman Elliot Engel, U.S. H.R. Comm. on Foreign Aff., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 21, 2020),

https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/_cache/files/5/7/577bfdef-657a-48d7-b8e9-1b91229daf5d/ 404E6B8B9F59DED

DBA792009808D9C91.5-21-2020.ele-letter-to-pompeo.pdf.

227 See id.

228 See id.

229 See Press Release, Chairman Elliot Engel, U.S. H.R. Comm. on Foreign Aff., Engel Announces Contempt Proceedings against

Pompeo (Aug. 28, 2020), https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2020/8/engel-announces-contempt-proceedings-against-pompeo.

230 Letter from Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Vice Chairman Mark Warner, S. Select Comm. on Intelligence, Speaker

Nancy Pelosi, and Chairman Adam Schiff, H. Select Comm. on Intelligence, to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (July 13, 2020),

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20200713_big_4_letter_to_fbi_director_wray_-_defensive_briefing_signed.pdf.

231 Letter from Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Vice Chairman Mark Warner, S. Select Comm. on Intelligence, Speaker

Nancy Pelosi, and Chairman Adam Schiff, H. Select Comm. on Intelligence, to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (July 13, 2020),

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20200713_big_4_letter_to_fbi_director_wray_-_defensive_briefing_signed.pdf; see

also Press Release, Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Warner Send Letter to FBI Director Requesting

Defensive Counterintelligence Briefing for All Members (July 20,2020), https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/72020-2.
59

One of those elements was an unclassified paragraph that summarized an open source

document created by Russia-aligned Ukrainian Andriy Derkach, which mentions the Chairmen

along with other Republican senators and administration officials. In that document, the

Chairmen are labeled as individuals who are fighting against Ukrainian corruption and under

their pictures is an envelope icon. The Democrats speculated that the envelope icon possibly

suggests that the Chairmen might have received information from this Ukrainian national. 

Liberal media outlets picked up that reference, clearly from a leak, even though the Chairmen

had not received any information from that Ukrainian national, including any alleged tapes. 

Those media outlets reported that the Chairmen had in fact received information from Derkach,

which is false.232 Indeed, clicking on the envelope icon in the document produces a collection of

public letters the Chairmen have sent during the investigation, not any additional documents that

Derkach allegedly sent to them. Although the Democrats’ letter and attachment from July 13

targeted the Chairmen’s investigation, they were not copied on the letter and were not granted

access to the classified portion until two weeks after it was sent to FBI and one week after

portions of it were publicly reported. 

On July 16, mere days before the Democrats’ July 13 letter became public, Ranking

Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden wrote to the Chairmen to request a briefing from

the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and other relevant members of the IC on matters related

to the Committees’ investigation.233 On July 28, 2020, the Chairmen responded to the Ranking

Members and reminded them that in March 2020, the FBI and relevant members of the IC had

briefed the Committees regarding the investigation and provided assurances at that time that

there was no reason that the Committees should not continue their investigation.234 Those

assurances were provided with knowledge of public reporting that Andrii Telizhenko provided

records to the Committees. Notably, Telizhenko had extensive and consistent contact with

Obama administration officials and a DNC consultant, and worked for the U.S.-based Democrat

firm Blue Star Strategies on matters relevant to the Committees’ investigation. As such, the only

records he provided to the Committees related to his work for Blue Star Strategies and his

interactions with Obama administration officials. Additionally, during that briefing, the agencies

made clear to the Committees’ staff that they did not have any additional information to provide

and that the relevant written products, which members have had access to for months, speak for

themselves. Subsequently, on Aug. 6, 2020, Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson received

another briefing from the FBI on behalf of the IC, in which the FBI stated that it is not

attempting to “quash, curtail, or interfere” in the investigation in any way.

 

232 See Natasha Bertrand, Andrew Desiderio, and Kyle Cheney, Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are Part of Foreign Plot

to Damage Biden, POLITICO (July 23, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/23/democrats-letters-to-trump-allies-areforeign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217; As the Chairmen have repeatedly said, they and their staff have not received, relied upon,

or solicited information from Derkach. 

233 Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., and Ranking Member Gary Peters, S. Comm. on Homeland

Sec. and Governmental Aff., to Chairman Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec.

and Governmental Aff. (July 16, 2020),

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/200716_Letter_PetersWyden_IntelligenceBriefingRequest.pdf.

234 Letter from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec. and

Governmental Aff., to Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., and Ranking Member Gary Peters, S. Comm. on

Homeland Sec. and Governmental Aff. (July 28, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07-28%20RHJCEG%20Letter%20to%20Peters-Wyden%20%28Defensive%20Briefing%29.pdf.
60

On July 20, 2020, Politico reported on the contents of the Democrats’ July 13, 2020

letter.235 Unnamed sources for the article alleged that the classified attachment cited the

investigation into Hunter Biden and others as “one of the sources of ... concern.”

236

 A

subsequent Politico article, again citing unnamed sources, reported that in 2019, Derkach

allegedly sent information to several members of Congress, including the Chairmen and Ranking

Member Wyden and Ranking Member Peters.237 The article then further suggested that these

weak parallels reinforced the “suspicions” of some Democrats that the Committees’ investigation

was ‘“laundering’ a foreign influence campaign to damage Biden.”

238

 The Politico article also

suggested that Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George

Kent and several other individuals have been the subject of Committee information requests.239 

The Chairmen repeatedly rejected claims that they had any engagement with Derkach. In

August 2020, Derkach was publicly identified by the IC as a proponent of a foreign-sourced

influence campaign to influence the 2020 election. He was later sanctioned by the U.S.

Department of Treasury for the same activity.240 Chairman Grassley and Chairman Johnson

praised the Treasury for imposing those sanctions.241

Since the offices of Chairman Johnson and Chairman Grassley did not receive, and were

unaware of, the information that Derkach had allegedly sent, it is impossible that Derkach’s

efforts could have shaped the Committees’ investigation in any way. Furthermore, it should now

be clear that Derkach’s core claims are in no way a part of the Committees’ investigative work. 

For example, according to media reports, Derkach is responsible for spreading allegations that

Burisma made direct payments to Joe Biden in the amount of $900,000, which were allegedly

funneled to Biden through his son’s consulting firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners, and marked for

“consultative services.”

242

 This claim about direct payments made to Joe Biden is not evaluated

in the Committees’ report of investigation, nor has it ever been cited as a predicate for any of the

Committees’ information requests. However, during the Chairmen’s staff interview of George

Kent, Ranking Member Peters’ staff inserted into the interview record the same Derkach-created

 

235 See Natasha Bertrand, Kyle Cheney, and Andrew Desiderio, Dem leaders demand FBI briefing on 'foreign interference

campaign' targeting lawmakers, POLITICO (July 20, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/20/democrats-fbi-briefingforeign-interference-campaign-373134.

236 See id.

237 See Natasha Bertrand, Andrew Desiderio, and Kyle Cheney, Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are Part of Foreign Plot

to Damage Biden, POLITICO (July 23, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/23/democrats-letters-to-trump-allies-areforeign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217. As the Chairmen have repeatedly said, they and their staff have not received, relied upon,

or solicited information from Derkach. 

238 See id.

239 See Natasha Bertrand, Andrew Desiderio, and Kyle Cheney, Democrats: Packets sent to Trump allies are Part of Foreign Plot

to Damage Biden, POLITICO (July 23, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/23/democrats-letters-to-trump-allies-areforeign-plot-to-damage-biden-380217.

240 See Press Release, Off. of the Dir. of Nat’l Intelligence, Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat

Update for the American Public, (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2139-statementby-ncsc-director-william-evanina-election-threat-update-for-the-american-public; see also Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of the

Treasury, Treasury Sanctions Russia-Linked Election Interference Actors (Sept. 10, 2020),

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1118.

241 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley, Johnson Praise Trump Admin Actions Against

Foreign Disinformation & Election Interference (Sept. 10, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassleyjohnson-praise-trump-admin-actions-against-foreign-disinformation.

242 Mark Moore, Giuliani claims Ukrainian company paid Joe Biden $900,000 in lobbying fees, NEW YORK POST (Oct. 10, 2019),

https://nypost.com/2019/10/10/giuliani-claims-ukrainian-company-paid-joe-biden-900000-in-lobbying-fees/.
61

document that Democrats relied on in their July 13 letter to falsely accuse the Chairmen of

relying on disinformation.243 Kent described Derkach’s document as disinformation, but

Ranking Member Peters’ staff used it anyway.244 Thus, the Ranking Members introduced

disinformation into the record, not the Chairmen.245

In summary, the Democrats’ July 13, 2020, letter relied on foreign disinformation to

create a false and harmful innuendo about the Chairmen’s oversight work. That innuendo was

then wrapped in a classified attachment in an apparent effort to fabricate a veneer of credibility

and shield their analysis from public scrutiny before being disseminated to news media, which

reported their speculation as fact. Ironically, the Democrats relied on and disseminated foreignsourced disinformation to falsely accuse Republicans of relying on that same foreign-sourced

disinformation.

Despite its inaccuracies, the Democrats’ false narrative has continued to be picked up,

amplified and circulated by a broad network of Democrat-friendly media outlets and Democratic

members of Congress. MSNBC has reported extensively on the Derkach allegations. 246 Further,

on Aug. 7, 2020, Senator Richard Blumenthal published an op-ed in The Washington Post in

which he repeated many of these baseless allegations as if they were fact.247 He wrote:

[I]t now appears that ... disinformation and deception are gaining a

toehold in Congress as well: On Wednesday, The Post reported that

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Homeland Security and

Governmental Affairs Committee, is moving ahead with an

investigation into presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe

Biden’s family using documents provided to the senator by the son

of a former KGB officer. Johnson’s actions are of such concern to

the CIA, according to news reports, that the agency has refused to

brief him. Think of it: Congress may become a forum for debunked

conspiracy theories peddled by Kremlin proxies. There is no excuse

for perpetuating Russian disinformation in the U.S. Senate, just as

there is there is no excuse for barring the American public from

learning more about the genuine foreign threats to the November

election.248

Senator Blumenthal’s reference to documents provided by a former KGB officer is a reference to

the debunked conspiracy theory that Derkach sent documents to the Chairmen. His reference to

the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) briefing relates to false allegations spread in an Aug. 5,

2020, Politico article that suggested that the CIA has refused to cooperate with an offer to brief

 

243 George Kent Testimony at 150.

244 George Kent Testimony at 156.

245 George Kent Testimony at 150.

246 See Steve Benen, Dems fear foreign influence campaign is using Ron Johnson probe, MSNBC (July 21, 2020),

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/dems-fear-foreign-influence-campaign-using-gop-s-ron-johnson-n1234509.

247 See Sen. Richard Blumenthal, The threat to U.S. elections is real, and frightening. The public has a right to know, THE

WASHINGTON POST (Aug. 7, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-threat-to-us-elections-is-real-and-frighteningthe-public-has-a-right-to-know/2020/08/07/366dba0e-d8dd-11ea-930e-d88518c57dcc_story.html.

248 Id.
62

the Committees because its officers have “deep skepticism of the probe[.]”

249

 In reality, the CIA

declined to provide a briefing because it considers any additional briefings to be unnecessary. 

The FBI is the lead agency for the IC in matters related to foreign election interference, and the

FBI already has repeatedly briefed the Committees on behalf of the IC. As previously noted, at a

March 2020 briefing, which included the Ranking Members’ staff, the FBI informed the

Committees that there was no reason they should not continue with their investigation. On Aug.

6, 2020, the FBI reiterated the same to the Chairmen.

The Chairmen responded to Senator Blumenthal, as well as Senator Chris Van Hollen’s

false statements regarding the investigation.250 In their response, the Chairmen reasserted that

they have not received any information from Derkach and that their focus is on government

records from the Obama administration and records from a Democrat lobby shop. The Chairmen

also noted to both senators that for years the senators peddled and pushed the now-debunked

Russian collusion narrative and used the “Steele dossier” — a Democrat bought-and-paid-for

document filled with Russian disinformation — to do so.

251

 Senators Blumenthal and Van

Hollen never responded to the Chairmen. 

d. Ongoing leaks

While these false narratives have developed and spread, leaks to the media have

continued. The same team of writers responsible for the above-referenced July 23, 2020,

Politico article have published several other pieces that contained leaked Committee information

related to the Ukraine investigation. On July 16, 2020, Politico published the names of

individuals who the Committees requested to interview, including David Wade, Antony Blinken,

Amos Hochstein, Victoria Nuland and Catherine Novelli.252 The article detailed areas of interest

for the investigation and stated that subpoenas could be issued as soon as July 22, 2020.253 None

of this information was made public by the Chairmen. Although the sources for the leaked

information contained in the article are unknown, the article states that a spokesman for

Chairman Johnson declined to comment on ongoing discussions with witnesses and Chairman

Grassley has not confirmed to the media any interviewees, whether potential or actual.254 On

July 22, Politico published an article stating that the Committees had secured an interview with

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs George Kent.

255

 The

article contained non-public scheduling details and indicated that Kent could be interviewed as

 

249 See Andrew Desiderio and Natasha Bertrand, CIA Steers Clear of Senate Republican Probe into Bidens, POLITICO (Aug. 5,

2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/05/cia-biden-senate-probe-391479.

250 Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., Grassley, Johnson to Colleagues: Stop Spreading ForeignSourced Falsehoods (Aug. 20, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/grassley-johnson-to-colleagues-stopspreading-foreign-sourced-falsehoods.

251 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., IG Footnotes: Serious Problems with Dossier Sources

Didn’t Stop FBI’s Page Surveillance (Apr. 15, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/ig-footnotes-seriousproblems-dossier-sources-didn-t-stop-fbi-s-page-surveillance.

252 Natasha Bertrand and Andrew Desiderio, Senate Republicans Eye Subpoenas of Biden Advisers in Burisma Probe, POLITICO

(July 16, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/16/joe-biden-advisers-burisma-subpoenas-366358.

253 Id.

254 Id.

255 Natasha Bertrand, Senate Republicans Secure Impeachment Witness who Flagged Concern about Hunter Biden, POLITICO

(July 22, 2020), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/22/republicans-impeachment-witness-hunter-biden-378495.
63

early as July 24, 2020.256 

e. Preferential treatment

Throughout this investigation, the Ranking Members have tried to create the narrative

that the Chairmen have received preferential treatment from the executive branch. The Ranking

Members have asserted that the executive branch has been too quick and too thorough in its

responses to Committee information requests.257 Ranking Member Wyden has made this

allegation repeatedly and has said they are legitimate efforts to raise awareness of a “double

standard of Trump administration cooperation with Congress.”258 The suggested implication is

that the Trump administration is working to quickly release information to the Committees

because the investigation includes Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, President Trump’s

political opponent in the 2020 presidential election. 

Allegations suggesting the existence of a double standard ring hollow. By no stretch has

the Trump administration responded to all of the Committees’ requests in a timely manner. The

Chairmen have dozens of outstanding requests related to the investigation, and on literally

hundreds of occasions, the Chairmen’s staff have had to remind the executive branch,

particularly the State Department, to comply with their requests.259 Indeed, in some cases, the

Committees have received relevant records from the administration after interviewing witnesses

who could have been asked about the information. That is the absence of cooperation.

Finally, recently released emails show that in the past, Democrats have exhibited the very

type of behavior they are now accusing Republicans of engaging in. These documents show

officials in the Obama administration scrambling to produce highly sensitive documents in

response to requests made by Democrat offices on Capitol Hill during the final days of the

Obama administration and before President Trump assumed office. In one email on Jan. 13,

2017, a State Department staffer pointedly remarked, “The clock is ticking.”

260

 That same day,

another urged, “Both Senators [Cardin and Warner] want the package by Thursday Jan. 19.”261 

 

256 Id.

257 See Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (May 6, 2020),

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6883366-Wyden-to-Pompeo-05-06-2020.html; Letter from Ranking Member Ron

Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of St. (July 7, 2020),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/070720%20Wyden%20to%20Pompeo%20Third%20Ukraine%20Request.pdf;

Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm. on Fin., to Fed. Bureau of Investigation (Aug. 17, 2020),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/download/081720-wyden-wray-fbi-letter; Letter from Ranking Member Ron Wyden, S. Comm.

on Fin., to U.S. Dep’t of Just. (Aug. 24, 2020),

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/082420%20Wyden%20Letter%20to%20AG%20Barr%20RE%20Halkbank%20F

ollow-up.pdf.

258 See Emma Loop, Here’s What’s Happening In Republicans’ Biden Ukraine Investigation, BUZZFEED NEWS (Feb. 6, 2020),

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emmaloop/republicans-biden-ukraine-investigation.

259 See Letters from Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., and Chairman Ron Johnson, S. Comm. on Homeland Sec.

and Governmental Aff., to U.S. Dep’t of St., U.S. Dep’t of Just., Fed. Bureau of Investigation, Off. of the Dir. of Nat.

Intelligence, and Cent. Intelligence Agency (July 28, 2020) (on file with Comms.) (Each letter indicates that there is a number of

outstanding requests for records and information from each respective department.).

260 Email from Naz Durakoglu, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Kerem Bilge, Eric Green, and Maria Germano, U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 13,

2017, 10:56 a.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).

261 Email from Naz Durakoglu, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Elizabeth Lawrence, Hera Abbasi, Kerem Bilge, Katherine Harris, Eric

Green, Christopher Robinson, et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 18, 2017, 3:10 p.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).
64

As the deadline for President Trump’s inauguration approached, on Jan. 18, one of the same

individuals wrote, “Is it possible for me to act as the courier and drop [the information] off to the

Hill tomorrow? There is a time sensitivity to these docs.”262

f. Conclusion

Many of the allegations Democrats have made against Republicans — that they are

relying on foreign disinformation, that they are carrying out a politicized investigation in an

effort to bring down their political opponents, and that they are working covertly with the

executive branch to quickly release sensitive information for political reasons — reflect the very

patterns of behavior that Democrats themselves have engaged in, and continue to engage in, on a

regular basis. 

Let us not forget how the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton

campaign paid for the Steele dossier, which was created by a foreign national, a former MI6

employee, and is based on Russian government sources.263 Some of those Russian government

sources were part of the Russian presidential administration and supported Hillary Clinton.264 

Moreover, in January 2017 and February 2017, the FBI received reporting, some from the IC,

that assessed portions of the Steele dossier were the product of a Russian disinformation

campaign.265 That’s no surprise, since the Russian Intelligence Services were also aware of the

dossier in early 2016 before the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane. Thus, the Steele dossier was

the perfect vehicle for disinformation to affect multiple elections and to sow discord and chaos.

Yet Democrats had no qualms about disseminating information from the dossier far and wide,

reading parts of the dossier into the congressional record, and using its allegations as the basis

for years of investigations and false claims against the Trump administration. Moreover, since

the Chairmen made public in April 2020 the fact that the Steele dossier contained Russian

disinformation, it does not appear that any Democrats have commented upon this revelation or

expressed concern about their previous reliance on Russian disinformation. Here, the Democrats

are again relying on unverified foreign disinformation to falsely accuse their political rivals of

doing the same.

Congressional oversight can and should be nonpartisan. It should be focused on exposing

wrongdoing regardless of who is involved and on ensuring transparency and accountability in

government on behalf of the American people. Efforts to discredit legitimate oversight,

especially using foreign disinformation to sow discord, only serves to benefit our foreign

adversaries at the expense of our own democratic institutions.

 

262 See Email from Julia Frifield, U.S. Dep’t of St., to Hera Abbasi, Anthony Wier, Rori Kramer, Lauren Gillis, Zachary Schram,

et al., U.S. Dep’t of St. (Jan. 5, 2017 9:52 a.m. EST) (on file with Comms.).

263 See Press Release, Chairman Charles Grassley, S. Comm. on Fin., IG Footnotes: Serious Problems with Dossier Sources

Didn’t Stop FBI’s Page Surveillance (Apr. 15, 2020), https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/ig-footnotes-seriousproblems-dossier-sources-didn-t-stop-fbi-s-page-surveillance.

264 See id.

265 See id.
65

XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH

UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH, AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE

CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS.

Hunter Biden was paid as much as $50,000 per month to serve on the board of Burisma, a

Ukrainian natural gas company with a corrupt owner, while his father was the public face of the

Obama administration’s Ukraine policy.266 But Burisma was not the only example of Hunter

Biden seeking to monetize his family name. During the course of our investigation, Chairman

Grassley and Chairman Johnson uncovered additional examples of Hunter Biden, other family

members, and their business associates pursuing financial arrangements with foreign nationals in

various parts of the world. 

The Treasury records acquired by the Chairmen show potential criminal activity relating

to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian,

Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals. In particular, these documents show that Hunter Biden

received millions of dollars from foreign sources as a result of business relationships that he built

during the period when his father was vice president of the United States and after. In addition

to providing new and descriptive details about the nature, origin and extent of payments from

Burisma Holdings to Hunter Biden, the documents acquired by the Committees also shed light

on a much broader array of questionable financial transactions involving Hunter Biden, other

members of the Biden family, and their associations with foreign nationals. These foreign

nationals have questionable backgrounds that have been identified as being consistent with a

range of criminal activities, including but not limited to organized prostitution and/or human

trafficking, money laundering, fraud, and embezzlement.267

The following transactions are designed to illustrate the financial associations between

and among subjects in the inquiry. Much has been reported about Hunter Biden and Devon

Archer and their corporate entities and foreign and domestic financial associations. The

transactions discussed below do not illustrate the full extent of the material the Committees

possess. The transactions discussed below are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some

questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious

counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family. The

Committees will continue to analyze the records in their possession.

 

266 Paul Sonne, Michael Kranish, and Matt Viser, The gas tycoon and the vice president’s son: The story of Hunter Biden’s foray

into Ukraine, THE WASHINGTON POST (Sept. 28, 2019), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-gas-tycoonand-the-vice-presidents-son-the-story-of-hunter-bidens-foray-in-ukraine/2019/09/28/1aadff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-

d943b4ed57e0_story.html; Polina Ivanova, Maria Tsvetkova, et al., What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy

company Burisma, REUTERS (Oct. 18, 2019), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine/what-hunter-biden-did-onthe-board-of-ukrainian-energy-company-burisma-idUSKBN1WX1P7.

267 There is extensive public reporting concerning Hunter Biden’s alleged involvement with prostitution services. Records on file

with the Committees do not directly confirm or refute these individual reports. However, they do confirm that Hunter Biden sent

thousands of dollars to individuals who have either: 1) been involved in transactions consistent with possible human trafficking;

2) an association with the adult entertainment industry; or 3) potential association with prostitution. Some recipients of those

funds are Ukrainian and Russian citizens. The records note that it is a documented fact that Hunter Biden has sent funds to nonresident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they

have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine. The records also note that some of these

transactions are linked to what “appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.” 
66

a. Burisma Holdings Limited

On April 15, 2014, Burisma Holdings (Burisma), a Ukrainian private oil and gas

company owned by corrupt Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, sent two wires totaling

$112,758.15 to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC.268 Rosemont Seneca Bohai is an apparent shell

entity owned by Hunter Biden’s long-time business associate, Devon Archer, which was first

registered in Delaware on Feb. 13, 2014.269

According to Real Clear Politics, on the following day, April 16, 2014, Archer visited

Vice President Biden at the White House.270 One week later, on April 22, 2014, Vice President

Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian

legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in Crimea.271 That same day, Burisma announced

that Archer had joined its board of directors.272 In the wake of Vice President Biden’s visit, the

press described him as “the public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.”273

The earliest payment from Burisma related to Hunter Biden appears to have been made to

Boies, Schiller, and Flexner LLP (Boies Schiller), the Washington law firm where he was

employed as a counsel in 2014.274 On May 7, 2014, mere weeks after Vice President Biden took

lead of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy, Burisma sent Boies Schiller a payment of

$250,000.275 Approximately one week later, on May 12, 2014, Hunter Biden joined Archer on

Burisma’s board of directors.276 Burisma made a second payment to Boies Schiller on Sept. 16,

2014, in the amount of $33,039.77.277 Both the May 7 and Sept. 16 payments state in the

transaction notes that they were “for Legal and Consulting Services.”278

 

268 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 1 (on file with Comms.).

269 See id.

270 Betsy McCaughey, Joe Biden Must Explain His Ukraine Dealings, REAL CLEAR POLITICS (Jan. 29, 2020),

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/01/29/joe_biden_must_explain_his_ukraine_dealings_142255.html. 

271 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden at a Meeting with Ukrainian

Legislators (Apr. 22, 2014), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-vice-president-joebiden-meeting-ukrainian-legislators; see also Press Release, The White House Off. Of the Vice President, Remarks to the Press

by Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (Apr. 22, 2014),

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-press-vice-president-joe-biden-and-ukrainian-primeminister-arse.

272 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, US Financier and Board Member Devon Archer on Maximizing Growth for Burisma

Holdings (Apr. 22, 2014), https://burisma-group.com/eng/news/us-financier-and-board-member-devon-archer-on-maximizinggrowth-for-burisma-holdings/.

273 Susan Crabtree, Joe Biden emerges as Obama’s trusty sidekick, WASHINGTON EXAMINER (Apr. 25, 2014),

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/joe-biden-emerges-as-obamas-trusty-sidekick.

274 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.); see also George Mesires, A Statement on behalf of Hunter Biden, dated

October 13, 2019, MEDIUM (Oct. 13, 2019), https://medium.com/@george.mesires/a-statement-on-behalf-of-hunter-biden-datedoctober-13-2019-d80bc11087ab.

275 Id.

276 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12,

2014), https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD984.pdf.

277 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).

278 Id.
67

Payments from Burisma to Boies Schiller have been the subject of past news reporting.279 

According to Hunter Biden’s attorney, George Mesires, at Biden’s urging, Boies Schiller

performed the following services for Burisma:

[E]ngaged Nardello & Co., a leading global investigative firm, to

assess, among other things, Burisma’s corporate structure and

government practices. Burisma agreed to pay the legal expenses of

Boies Schiller to support Hunter in developing corporate reform

initiatives.280

However, according to statements made at the time by both Hunter Biden and Burisma, these

were Hunter Biden’s responsibilities as a member of Burisma’s board of directors. In a press

release issued on May 12, 2014, Biden stated:

I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters

of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility,

international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the

economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.281

Alan Apter, the chairman of Burisma’s board of directors, also said “[t]he company’s strategy is

aimed at the strongest concentration of professional staff and the introduction of best corporate

practices, and we’re delighted that Mr. Biden is joining us to help us achieve these goals.” 282

It is unclear whether any of the funds sent from Burisma to Boies Schiller were used to

pay for services that Hunter Biden was supposed to provide to Burisma as a member of the

board. Additionally, if Burisma was paying Boies Schiller for consulting services provided by

third-party firm Nardello & Co, as Mesires has indicated, it remains unclear why Hunter Biden

did not provide or arrange those services himself, on his own time, in exchange for the

compensation he was receiving from Burisma as a member of the board.

Between May 15, 2014 and Feb. 12, 2016, Burisma sent another 48 wires to Rosemont

Seneca Bohai, totaling $3,489,490.78.283 Of the 48 transactions, 39 are described as “Consulting

Services” and 39 of the 48 are in the amount of $83,333.33, with the last of the payments

occurring on Feb. 12, 2016.284 Between June 5, 2014, and Oct. 5, 2015, Rosemont Seneca Bohai

sent 38 wires totaling $701,979 to three of Hunter Biden’s bank accounts.285 These transfers

 

279 See Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and

Allies, THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html.

280 George Mesires, A Statement on behalf of Hunter Biden, dated October 13, 2019, MEDIUM (Oct. 13, 2019),

https://medium.com/@george.mesires/a-statement-on-behalf-of-hunter-biden-dated-october-13-2019-d80bc11087ab.

281 Press Release, Burisma Holdings, Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings (May 12,

2014), https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD984.pdf.

282 Id.

283 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 1 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 3 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL

DOCUMENT 4 (on file with Comms.).

284 Id. 

285 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 1 (on file with Comms.).
68

may represent the final step in the flow of funds from Burisma to Rosemont Seneca Bohai to

Biden during this period.

The nature of the payment arrangement between Biden and Burisma appears to have

changed over time. In May 2016, Hunter Biden’s business partner, Archer, and five others were

arrested and criminally charged in a scheme to defraud investors and a tribal entity of millions of

dollars.286 Starting Jan. 25, 2016, Burisma began sending regular payments for Biden to his

Washington law firm, Owasco PC (Owasco).287 Owasco was incorporated on Jan. 19, 2006, lists

an agent address in Washington, and lists its executing officer and governor as Robert Hunter

Biden.288

 

Payments from Burisma to Owasco continued throughout most of 2016 and ceased eight

days after Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the Nov. 8, 2016 presidential election.289 

Between Jan. 25, 2016, and Nov. 16, 2016, Burisma sent nine wires totaling $752,054.99 to

Owasco with each of the nine transactions listing “Owasco, PC/Robert Biden” as the recipient.290 

Of the nine, two payments were for $83,333.33, five were for $83,333 one was for $84,992.33,

and one was for $83,731.291 The records acquired by the Committees show the last documented

payment was made on Nov. 16, 2016.292 Biden continued to serve on Burisma’s board of

directors until April 2019.293 

In addition to being the owner of Burisma, Zlochevsky made at least two large cash

transfers to Burisma during the time that Archer and Biden served on its board of directors.294 

On April 30, 2014, around the dates when Archer and Hunter Biden first joined Burisma’s board

of directors, Zlochevsky wired $12.3 million from another one of his companies, Brociti

Investments Limited (Brociti), to Burisma.295 Brociti is based in Kyiv, Ukraine, and is registered

in Limassol, Cyprus.296 Zlochevsky sent another wire from Brociti to Burisma on April 20,

2015, in the amount of $212,000.297 It’s unclear exactly how much, if any, of the funds wired by

Zlochevsky on April 30, 2014, and April 20, 2015, were used to cover the payments made from

Burisma to Rosemont Seneca, Owasco, and Boies Schiller. However, these transactions,

 

286 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Seven Defendants Charged In Manhattan Federal Court With Defrauding A Native

American Tribe And Investors Of Over $60 Million (May 11, 2016), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/seven-defendantscharged-manhattan-federal-court-defrauding-native-american-tribe-and.

287 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).

288 See Owasco P.C., OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_2684079. Owasco P.C. was

incorporated in January 2006; Eric Schwerin was a governor and executing officer, and Hunter Biden was an agent. In December

2019, both Schwerin and Hunter Biden rescinded those affiliations with Owasco. See Events for Owasco P.C., OpenCorporates,

https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_2684079/events.

289 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 5 (on file with Comms.).

290 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 5 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).

291 Id.

292 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 5 (on file with Comms.).

293 Kenneth P. Vogel and Iuliia Mendel, Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and

Allies, THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 1, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html.

294 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).

295 Id. 

296 Lobbying registration, ML Strategies, https://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=C4C8E1E0-

861C-4F02-B73E-0FE6578BD4D8&filingTypeID=1.

297 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).
69

including those to Biden and his companies, were identified for potential financial criminal

activity. 

b. Russia

Hunter Biden and his associate, Archer, had a financial relationship with Russian

businesswoman Elena Baturina. Baturina is the former wife of the late Yuri Luzhkov, who was

the mayor of Moscow and was fired in 2010 by then-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev over

corruption allegations.298 Baturina became Russia’s only female billionaire when her plastics

company, Inteko, received a series of Moscow municipal contracts while her husband was

mayor.299 According to reporting, “Luzhkov used his position as mayor to approve over 20 real

estate projects that were built by a Baturina-owned construction company and ultimately

generated multibillion-ruble profits for his family.”300 In addition, a Russian investigation led to

a criminal case against the former head of the Bank of Moscow, Andrey Borodin, who “allegedly

used money from the Moscow City Budget to lend money to shell companies, which ultimately

transferred $443 million to Baturina.”

301

 

On Feb. 14, 2014, Baturina wired $3.5 million to a Rosemont Seneca Thornton LLC

(Rosemont Seneca Thornton) bank account for a “Consultancy Agreement DD12.02.2014.”

302

 

Rosemont Seneca Thornton is an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden that was

incorporated on May 28, 2013 in Wilmington, Del.303 According to The Financial Times,

Rosemont Seneca Thornton is a consortium that consists of Rosemont Seneca Partners and the

Thornton Group, a Massachusetts-based firm.304 In June 2009, Biden co-founded Rosemont

Seneca Partners with Archer and Christopher Heinz.305 The Thornton Group’s website states

that it has offices in Boston and Beijing, lists Rosemont Seneca Partners among its list of

alliances and clients, and includes photographs from multiple events attended by Hunter

Biden.306 

 

298 David Filipov, Yuri Luzhkov, transformative Moscow Mayor, dies at 83, THE WASHINGTON POST (Dec. 10, 2019),

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/yuri-luzhkov-transformative-moscow-mayor-dies-at-83/2019/12/10/158ed11c1b3f-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html; Christian Eriksson and Margot Gibbs, Russia’s richest woman quits role at London

Mayor’s charity after Finance Uncovered investigation, FINANCED UNCOVERED (Sept. 26, 2019),

https://www.financeuncovered.org/investigations/yelena-baturina-be-open-mayors-fund-for-london-sadiq-khan-corruption. 

299 Id.

300 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 6 (on file with Comms.).

301 Id.

302 Id.

303 Rosemont Seneca Thornton, LLC, OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/5341255; see also Aime

Williams, Sun Yu, and Roman Olearchyk, Hunter Biden’s web of interests, FINANCIAL TIMES (Oct. 9, 2019),

https://www.ft.com/content/3904f888-e8ef-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55.

304 Aime Williams, Sun Yu, and Roman Olearchyk, Hunter Biden’s web of interests, FINANCIAL TIMES (Oct. 9, 2019),

https://www.ft.com/content/3904f888-e8ef-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55.

305 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

306 Contact, Thornton Group, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/contact.html; Alliances/Clients, Thornton Group,

http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html; Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca

executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12, 2010),

http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282; Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group meets with

senior financial holding executives from Taiwan (May 24, 2011),

http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=288; CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 6 (on file with Comms.).
70

Separately, between May 6, 2015 and Dec. 8, 2015, Baturina sent 11 wires in the amount

of $391,968.21 to a bank account belonging to BAK USA LLC (BAK USA).307 Nine of the 11

transactions, totaling $241,797.14 were sent from Baturina’s accounts to a Rosemont Seneca

Thornton bank account, which then transferred to the money to BAK USA.308 The 11

transactions all listed “Loan Agreement” in the payment details section.309 BAK USA was a

startup technology company headquartered in Buffalo, N.Y., that produced tablet computers in

cooperation with unnamed Chinese business partners.310 BAK USA filed for bankruptcy on

March 29, 2019, with a reported loss of $39 million.311 These transactions were identified

because of Baturina’s reported criminal activity.

c. Kazakhstan

 On April 22, 2014, Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Ukrainian Prime Minister

Arsemy Yasenyuk and addressed Ukrainian legislators in Kyiv regarding Russia’s actions in

Crimea.312 The same day, Novatus Holding PTE. LTD. (Novatus Holding), a private holding

company in Singapore, used a Latvian bank to wire $142,300 to Archer’s company, Rosemont

Seneca Bohai.313 The currency transaction report states, “For Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, ...

For a Car.”314

According to a Securities and Exchange Commission report, Kenges Rakishev of

Kazakhstan is the sole shareholder of Novatus Holding and has a business address associated

with a company in Kazakhstan called SAT & Company.315 Rakishev is the son-in-law of nowretired Kazakhstan politician, Imangali Tasmagambetov.316 At the time that Rakishev sent the

money to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, Tasmagambetov was serving as the mayor of Astana (now

called Nur-Sultan), the capital city of Kazakhstan.317 Tasmagambetov is reportedly a longtime

 

307 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 6 (on file with Comms.).

308 Id.

309 Id.

310 Samantha Christmann, Microsoft contract is a boon for Buffalo tablet-maker BAK USA, BUFFALO NEWS (Mar. 16, 2016),

https://buffalonews.com/business/local/microsoft-contract-is-a-boon-for-buffalo-tablet-maker-bak-usa/article_a31de7bd-81c1-

5646-89dc-032333a9c9cd.html.

311 Local News, Former tablet maker BAK USA reports more than $39 million loss in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing, WKBW

BUFFALO (Apr. 11, 2019), https://www.wkbw.com/news/local-news/former-tablet-maker-bak-usa-has-more-than-39-million-loss.

312 Press Release, The White House Off. of the Vice President, Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden at a Meeting with Ukrainian

Legislators (Apr. 22, 2014), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-vice-president-joebiden-meeting-ukrainian-legislators; see also Press Release, The White House Off. Of the Vice President, Remarks to the Press

by Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (Apr. 22, 2014),

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-press-vice-president-joe-biden-and-ukrainian-primeminister-arse.

313 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 4 (on file with Comms.).

314 Id.

315 U.S. SEC. AND EXCH. COMM’N, Schedule 13D, Net Element International, Inc.,

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1499961/000119312512418766/d422610dsc13d.htm.

316 Olzhas Auyezov, Kazakh Leader Promotes Daughter, Confident in Reshuffle, REUTERS (Sept. 13, 2016),

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazakhstan-president-daughter/kazakh-leader-promotes-daughter-confidant-in-reshuffleidUSKCN11J1JR; see also Dmitry Solovyov and Mariya Gordeyeva, Kazkommertsbank finalizes deal to buy stake in BTA Bank,

REUTERS (Feb. 6, 2014), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazkommertsbank-btabank-idUSBREA150VD20140206.

317 Joshua Kucera, Kazakhstan’s Defense Minister Fired After Six Months On Job, EURASIANET (Oct. 24, 2014),

https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstans-defense-minister-fired-after-six-months-on-job.
71

confidant of then-President Nursultan Nazarbayev.318 Tasmagambetov has since served as prime

minister of Kazakhstan as well as Kazakh ambassador to Russia.319

At the time of Vice President Biden’s visit to Kyiv, there were divided opinions in

Kazakhstan over Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the international situation had produced

tension in the region generally.320 Nazarbayev’s government reportedly shifted positions over

time, and Nazarbayev reportedly made some statements supportive of Russia’s actions.321 Given

Rakishev’s close connection to political leadership in Kazakhstan, the tense political situation,

Hunter Biden’s longstanding relationship with Archer and involvement in transactions with

Rosemont Seneca Bohai, and the fact that the payment was timed perfectly with Vice President

Biden’s visit to Kyiv to discuss U.S. sanctions against Russia for the invasion of Crimea, the

April 22, 2014 payment from Rakishev to Rosemont Seneca Bohai raises serious questions. It is

unclear why a foreign company, Novatus Holding, would purchase a $142,300 car for Rosemont

Seneca Bohai when the company does not deal in vehicles.

d. China

Hunter Biden and Devon Archer engaged in numerous financial transactions with

Chinese nationals who had deep connections to the Communist Chinese government. These

Chinese nationals included Ye Jianming, founder of CEFC China Energy Co. Ltd (CEFC) and

chairman of the board for its subsidiary, the China Energy Fund Committee (CE Fund). They

also included Gongwen Dong, who was Ye Jianming’s associate and reportedly executed

transactions for his companies. Ye’s connections to the Communist government are extensive

and, as explained below, he has been previous affiliations with the People’s Liberation Army.

Based on the information received by the Committees, Ye was also financially connected to Vice

President Biden’s brother, James Biden. Thus, there exists a vast web of corporate connections

and financial transactions between and among the Biden family and Chinese nationals. 

i. Hunter Biden Has Extensive Financial Connections to the Chinese

Government.

Hunter Biden has extensive connections to Chinese businesses and Chinese foreign

nationals that are linked to the Communist government. Those contacts bore financial fruit when

his father was vice president and after he left office. For example, in June 2009, Hunter Biden

had co-founded Rosemont Seneca Partners with Archer and Heinz.322 During 2010-2011, as a

representative of Rosemont Seneca, Hunter Biden networked with representatives from

Chinese state-owned enterprises and representatives of the Boston-based Thornton Group,

 

318 Olzhas Auyezov, Kazakh Leader Promotes Daughter, Confident in Reshuffle, REUTERS (Sept. 13, 2016),

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kazakhstan-president-daughter/kazakh-leader-promotes-daughter-confidant-in-reshuffleidUSKCN11J1JR.

319 Galiya Khassenkhanova, Kazakh President reshuffles key government positions, THE ASTANA TIMES (Dec. 19, 2019),

https://astanatimes.com/2019/12/kazakh-president-reshuffles-key-government-positions/.

320 Ryskeldi Satke, Kazakhstan Opposition Fears Ukraine’s “Russian Spring”, THE DIPLOMAT (Apr. 12, 2014),

https://thediplomat.com/2014/04/kazakhstan-opposition-fears-ukraines-russian-spring/.

321 Id.

322 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.
72

which today describes itself as “a cross-border capital intermediary.”323 On its current

website, the Thornton Group includes among its alliances and clients a variety of Chinese

state-owned enterprises, including actors linked to Ye Jianming and his associates.324 

Ye Jianming is a Chinese businessman and a frequent figure in Hunter Biden’s financial

dealings in China. Based on public reports that were available in 2015, when his contact with

Biden began to ramp up, Ye was a founder of CEFC China Energy Co. Ltd (CEFC) and served

as chairman of the board for its subsidiary, the China Energy Fund Committee (CE Fund).325 

CEFC had a reported income estimated at $33.4 billion, according to 2013 figures that were

available at the time.326 Although CEFC reportedly remained a private company until stateowned enterprises assumed control of it in 2018, reporting in 2017 indicated that it received

financing from the China Development Bank, “hired a number of former top officials from stateowned energy companies” and had “layers of Communist Party committees across its

subsidiaries — more than at many private Chinese companies.”327 Thus, it had significant

connections to the Communist government and its subsidiaries had associations with the

Thornton Group. For example, according to the Thornton Group’s website, its list of Chinese

partners currently includes:

the Agricultural Bank of China, the Bank of Beijing, the China

Council for the Promotion of International Trade, the Chinese

People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs, the CAIFC, the China

Electricity Council, CITIC Group, China Life, the China State

Construction Engineering Corporation, the China Railway

Construction Corporation, the Council for Industrial and

Commercial Development, the Chinese International Economy

Cooperation Association, the China Mining Association, the

government-owned Founder Group, the Industrial and

Commercial Bank of China Limited, and Peking University.328 

A Thornton Group press release dated April 12, 2010, provides an example of an early event

in China involving Rosemont Seneca Partners and the Thornton Group. It states the

following:

Thornton Group and its US partner Rosemont Seneca Chairman

Hunter Biden (the second son of the US Vice President Joe Biden)

and other high-level officials visited Chinese financial institutions

 

323 See About Us, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html; see also Press Release, Thorton Group, Thornton

Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12, 2010),

http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282; Press Release, Thorton Group, Thornton Group meets with

senior financial holding executives from Taiwan (May 24, 2011),

http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=288.

324 See Alliances/Clients, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.

325 See J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463.

326 See id.

327 Chen Aizhu and Jan Lopatka, China’s CEFC has big ambitions, but little known about ownership, funding, REUTERS (Jan. 12,

2017), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cefc-china/chinas-cefc-has-big-ambitions-but-little-known-about-ownership-fundingidUSKBN14X0B5; see CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

328 Alliances/Clients, Thornton, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.
73

and fund companies from April 7th to 9th. Including China

Investment Co., Ltd., National Council of Social Security Funds,

China Life Asset Management Co., Ltd., Postal Savings Bank of

China, Hillhouse Capital and Founder Group, etc., aiming to further

deepen mutual understanding and explore the possibility of

commercial cooperation and opportunity. The Chinese companies

and financial institutions visited expressed a warm welcome to

Thornton Group and Rosemont Seneca, and hoped to strengthen

exchanges, in-depth discussions and reach cooperation.

The delegation was led by James Bulger, Chairman of Thornton

Group, and Lin Junliang, Chief Executive Officer, to visit and meet

Chinese personnel including: Gao Xiqing, General Manager and

Chief Investment Officer of China Investment Corporation, Equity

Assets Department (Industrial Investment Department) of the

National Council of Social Security Fund person in charge Ji

Guoqiang, Vice President Cui Yong of China Life Asset

Management Co. Ltd., Peng Zuogang, General Manager of Postal

Savings Bank of China, Zhang Lei, Founder of Hillhouse Capital,

Wei Xin, Chairman of Founder Group, and Xia Yangjun, Vice

President of Founder Group.329

Pictures from the event posted by the Thornton Group show Hunter Biden standing with

the chairman of the Founder Group, general manager of the China Investment Corporation, the

vice president of the China Life Asset Management Company, the general manager of the Postal

Savings Bank, and others.330 

In 2012, Archer and Biden reportedly spoke with Jonathan Li of the Chinese private

equity fund Bohai Capital about the possibility of forming a company, Bohai Harvest RST

(Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Co. (BHR), that would invest Chinese capital

in companies outside of China.331 BHR was eventually formed as an investment fund and is

reportedly “controlled and funded primarily by large Chinese government-owned shareholders”

and is 80% controlled by Chinese entities.

332

 That list of entities includes the government’s

postal savings bank, with which Hunter Biden had networked in 2011, its main development

bank, as well as the Bank of China.333 Hunter Biden served on its board of directors and

 

329 Press Release, Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry

executives (Apr. 12, 2010), http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282. (Translation provided by

Google.).

330 See id.

331 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

332 See James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403.

333 See James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403; see also Press Release,

Thornton Group, Thornton Group brings Rosemont Seneca executives to visit Chinas financial/fund industry executives (Apr. 12,

2010), http://www.thorntonai.com/english/newscount.asp?ArticleID=282.
74

“joined based on his interest in seeking ways to bring Chinese capital to international

markets.”334 He served unpaid but reportedly acquired a 10% stake in the company in 2017.335 

Prior to its creation, in December 2013 and one month after the shareholders signed contracts

relating to the creation of the company, Hunter Biden reportedly flew aboard Air Force Two with

then-Vice President Biden to Beijing.336 While in China, Hunter Biden reportedly helped

arrange for Li to “shake hands” with Vice President Biden.337 Afterward, Hunter Biden met with

Li for what was reportedly a “social meeting.”338 After the China trip, BHR’s business license

was reportedly approved.339 

In September 2014, BHR had become a private equity shareholder in Sinopec

Chemical Commercial Holding Company Limited, a subsidiary of Sinopec.340 Sinopec is

reportedly the second largest oil and gas company in China and the largest refiner of oil in

Asia.341 In 2016, Ye announced at a board meeting that he wanted CEFC “to become a

second Sinopec ... by acquiring global assets and consolidating ‘teapot’ [independent]

refineries.”342 Hunter Biden’s position of influence and connections to Chinese business

interests, which were further strengthened while his father was vice president, most likely

appealed to Ye, a man who The New York Times has since described as “[wanting] access to

the corridors of power in Washington.”343 

BHR’s extensive connections to Chinese government intertwined its existence with the

decision-making of Communist party rulers. For example, the China Development Bank

(CDB) is one member of a consortium that controls 30% of BHR.344 Other members of that

particular consortium are the government’s postal savings bank and the Bank of China.345 

Importantly, the CDB appears to have been connected to Ye Jianming’s CEFC. Records

acquired by the Committees note that, according to reports, after CEFC and Ye fell out of

favor with the Chinese government in 2018, “at the orders of President Xi Jinping, China

Development Bank abruptly pulled its lines of credit on offshore bonds for CEFC[.]”346 

Moreover, the former chairman of the CDB, Hu Huaibang, was accused in a 2018 court case

of helping a CEFC subsidiary to obtain billions in financing during his time at the CDB and of

 

334 Katie Glueck, Hunter Biden to Leave Chinese Company Board, Addressing Appearance of a Conflict, THE NEW YORK TIMES

(Oct. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/13/us/politics/hunter-biden-china.html.

335 Id.

336 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize his Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

337 Id.

338 Id.

339 Sharon LaFraniere and Michael Forsythe, What We know About Hunter Biden’s Business in China, THE NEW YORK TIMES

(Mar. 6, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/us/politics/hunter-biden-china.html.

340 Team, BHR Partners, https://web.archive.org/web/20180404080538/http://en.bhrpe.com/newsitem/276817011.

341 Chen Aizhu, China's CEFC courts 'teapots' for first domestic refinery acquisition, REUTERS (Mar. 10, 2017),

https://de.reuters.com/article/us-china-m-a-cefc-idUSKBN16H0G4.

342 Id.

343 Alexandra Stevenson, David Barboza, Matthew Goldstein, and Paul Mozur, A Chinese Tycoon Sought Power and Influence.

Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-bidenchina-washington-ye-jianming.html.

344 James T. Areddy, What We Know About Hunter Biden’s Dealings in China, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 4, 2019),

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403.

345 See id.

346 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).
75

channeling bribes on behalf of Ye while serving in a previous position at the Bank of

Communications, another Chinese government entity.347

Hunter Biden’s business associations in China were not limited to investment funds like

BHR and those additional connections created questionable associations with Communist

government elements. For example, in 2015, while his father was vice president, Hunter Biden

reportedly met with an aide to Ye.348 In addition to the Communist government, Ye also had

reported connections and affiliations to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

349

 For example,

from 2003 to 2005, Ye reportedly served as deputy secretary general of the China Association

for International Friendly Contacts (CAIFC), which is the public name for the PLA General

Political Department’s International Liaison Department.350 Additionally, in 2014, under Ye’s

leadership, CE Fund had co-organized events with the China Huayi Broadcasting Corporation

(CHBC), a company incorporated by the PLA General Political Department.351 The CEO of

CHBC, Wang Shu, was commander of the PLA General Political Department base “[a]t the

forefront of applied psychological operations and propaganda directed against Taiwan,” which

was managed by a training center that was funded by a subsidiary of CEFC.352 The general

manager of that subsidiary, Lan Huasheng, was deputy secretary general of Ye’s CE Fund.353 

Wang reportedly attended the 2014 CE Fund and CHBC event along with Xu Jialu, a man

who was associated with the PLA’s CAIFC as well as CE Fund and China’s Confucius

Institutes.354 Huasheng served as executive director of CE Fund’s China Institute of Culture

Limited (CIOC), “a nationally supported organization in charge of ‘promoting Chinese

culture.’”355 Accordingly, Ye and his associates had robust relationships with China’s

military units, some of which were involved in matters in direct opposition to U.S. policy in

the region. 

 

347 Tony Munroe, Cheng Leng, Engen Tham and Min Zhang, Ex-chairman of China Development Bank under probe by graftbuster, REUTERS (July 31, 2019), https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-china-corruption/ex-chairman-of-china-development-bankunder-probe-by-graft-buster-idUKKCN1UQ0M3.

348 Alexandra Stevenson, David Barboza, Matthew Goldstein, and Paul Mozur, A Chinese Tycoon Sought Power and Influence.

Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018),

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-biden-china-washington-ye-jianming.html. (The name of Ye’s aide and the

exact date of the meeting have not been publically reported. The aforementioned meeting, and another meeting between Hunter

Biden and Ye that took place in May 2017, were confirmed by “people with direct knowledge of the meetings who were not

authorized to speak publicly because the meetings were private.”).

349 J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463.

350 See J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463; see also International Liaison

Department [China Association for International Friendly Contacts] General Political Department, FEDERATION OF AMERICAN

SCIENTISTS (Nov. 26, 1997), https://fas.org/irp/world/china/pla/gpd_ild.htm.

351 J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463.

352 Id.

353 Id.

354 J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463. (According to records on file with the

Committees, it appears that Gongwen Dong, a mutual associate of Ye Jianming, James Biden, Sara Biden, and Hunter Biden,

recently contributed to the Confucius Foundation Inc. On July 29, 2019, there was a wire for $5,000 from a Golden Coast Asset

Management LLC account that is linked to both Gongwen Dong and Shan Gao to the Confucius Foundation Inc. with memo,

“Gongwen Dong.”) CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 8 (on file with Comms.).

355 J. Michael Cole, Unstoppable: China’s Secret Plan to Subvert Taiwan, THE NATIONAL INTEREST (Mar. 23, 2015),

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/unstoppable-chinas-secret-plan-subvert-taiwan-12463.
76

It is unclear whether Hunter Biden was aware of Ye’s close relationship with the PLA

or involvement in efforts to develop and spread Chinese propaganda at the time of his 2015

meeting with Ye’s associate. However, public reporting did make those connections.356 

Hunter Biden’s connections with Ye continued into the summer of 2017, when he met

with Ye while soliciting donations for World Food Program USA in his capacity as a member of

its board of directors.357 At the time, Ye continued to operate the CE Fund, which has since been

found to have engaged in criminal activities.358 During their interactions in 2017, Hunter Biden

reportedly agreed to assist Ye by using his contacts to help Ye locate potential investments for

CEFC in the United States.359 In keeping with that agreement, after meeting Ye, Hunter Biden

stated that he began working on a deal for Ye that involved a $40 million investment in a natural

gas project on Monkey Island in Louisiana that reportedly fell through the following year.360 

Around the same time that Hunter Biden began this work, Ye raised concerns with Hunter Biden

that one of his associates, Patrick Ho, was under investigation by U.S. law enforcement.361 

Hunter Biden subsequently agreed to represent Ho.362 

On Sept. 8, 2017, a $9.1 billion deal was announced whereby Ye’s company, CEFC,

would acquire a stake in the state-owned Russian energy company, Rosneft.363 Ye’s efforts to

acquire a stake in Rosneft appear fully consistent with his vision of turning CEFC into a “second

Sinopec” with holdings across the world.364 

ii. Hunter Biden and his Family had Extensive Financial Connections to Ye

Jianming, Gongwen Dong and other Chinese Nationals.

On the same day that the impending Rosneft deal was announced, Hunter Biden and

Gongwen Dong, a Chinese national who has reportedly executed transactions for limited liability

companies controlled by Ye Jianming, applied to a bank and opened a line of credit under the

business name Hudson West III LLC (Hudson West III).365 Hunter Biden, James Biden, and

James Biden’s wife, Sara Biden, were all authorized users of credit cards associated with the

 

356 See id.

357 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

358 See Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Former Head of Organization Backed by Chinese Energy Conglomerate Sentenced to

Three Years in Prison for International Bribery and Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-three-years-prison.

359 Adam Entous, Will Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?, THE NEW YORKER (July 1, 2019),

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign.

360 Id.

361 Id.

362 Id.

363 Olesya Astakhova and Chen Aizhu, China invests $9.1 billion in Rosneft as Glencore, Qatar cut stakes REUTERS (Sept. 8,

2017), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-cefc-glencore/china-invests-9-1-billion-in-rosneft-as-glencore-qatar-cut-stakesidUSKCN1BJ1HT.

364 See Chen Aizhu, China's CEFC courts 'teapots' for first domestic refinery acquisition, REUTERS (Mar. 10, 2017),

https://de.reuters.com/article/us-china-m-a-cefc-idUSKBN16H0G4.

365 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 9 (on file with Comms.); see also Katherine Clarke, A Top Chinese Oilman Vanishes, and a

Manhattan Buying Binge Ends, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Oct. 25, 2018), https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-top-chinese-oilmanvanishes-and-a-manhattan-buying-binge-ends-1540478781.
77

account.366 The Bidens subsequently used the credit cards they opened to purchase $101,291.46

worth of extravagant items, including airline tickets and multiple items at Apple Inc. stores,

pharmacies, hotels and restaurants.367 The cards were collateralized by transferring $99,000

from a Hudson West III account to a separate account, where the funds were held until the cards

were closed.368 The transaction was identified for potential financial criminal activity. The

Committees prepared the following chart which displays transactions related to the line of credit:

On 09/08/2017 a line of credit was opened for 

$99,000.00 via an online application by 

Gongwen Dong & Hunter Biden

05/25/2018 date of final payment of 

$101,291.46 

via cashiers check payable to 

Hudson West III & Robert H. Biden

James B. Biden (Individual) 

Role: Subject

Accounts: Two Credit Cards

Sara Jones Biden (Individual) 

Role: Subject

Accounts: One Credit Card

Robert Hunter Biden (Individual) 

Subject Type: Both Purchaser and Payee

Accounts: Two Bank Accounts and One Credit Card

Gongwen Dong (Individual) 

Subject Type: Purchaser/Sender

Accounts: One Bank Account 

Hudson West III LLC (Investment Holding Company) 

City/Country: New York, NY 

Subject Type: Payee/Receiver

Accounts: Two Bank Accounts and Four Credit Cards

Notes: On 09/08/2017, Hunter Biden and GongWen Dong applied online to Cathay 

Bank and opened a line of credit under the business name Hudson West III, LLC. The cards 

were collateralized by transferring $99,000.00 from a Cathay Bank account to the Hudson 

West III business account where the funds were held until the cards were closed. The 

authorized users of these credit cards include Hunter Biden, James Biden and Sara Biden 

and each used the cards around the world to purchase $101,291.46. worth of extravagant 

items to include airline tickets, multiple purchases at Apple Stores and pharmacies, as well 

as hotels and restaurants. 

Robert Hunter Biden (Individual) 

Subject Type: Both Purchaser and Payee

Accounts: One Bank Account 

Hudson West III was incorporated on April 19, 2016, more than a year before the credit

cards were issued.369 Hudson West III, which is now dissolved, changed ownership at some

unknown point.370 After that change, ownership was divided between Hunter Biden’s law firm,

Owasco PC (50%) and Coldharbour Capital LLC (50%).371 Although ownership in Coldharbour

Capital is equally divided between two individuals, Mervyn Yan and Tian Zhang, it has a

business address identified as the address of Gongwen Dong.372 According to records on file

with the Committees, Hudson West III checking accounts were opened on Aug. 3, 2017, and

Sept. 6, 2017, with Yan and Robert Hunter Biden.373 Gongwen Dong was a former signer,

which suggests that at one time he was associated with Hudson West III’s bank accounts and

finances.374 

 

366 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 9 (on file with Comms.).

367 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 9 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 10 (on file with Comms.).

368 Id.

369 See Hudson West III, LLC, OpenCorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/6020436.

370 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

371 Id.

372 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.); see also

Coldharbour Capital, LLC, Opencorporates, https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/4703700.

373 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

374 Id.
78

On Aug. 4, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment (US) LLC, a subsidiary of Ye

Jianming’s CEFC China Energy Company that listed Gongwen Dong as its director, sent Hunter

Biden’s law firm, Owasco, a payment for $100,000.375 This transaction was identified for

potential criminal financial activity.

376 One of the investment entities of CEFC Infrastructure

Investment is reportedly Shanghai Huaxin Group, a Chinese state-owned enterprise “engaged in

petroleum products.”377 That company is owned by CEFC Shanghai International Group Ltd.,

which is controlled by Shanghai Guosheng Group, another state-owned enterprise.378 According

to reporting, CEFC Shanghai was a CEFC subsidiary linked to the aforementioned corruption

allegations involving the head of the China Development Bank.379 These examples further

illustrate the deep financial connections between Biden, Owasco, and the Chinese government.

On Aug. 8, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to the bank account

for Hudson West III.380 These funds may have originated from a loan issued from the account of

a company called Northern International Capital Holdings, a Hong Kong-based investment

company identified at one time as a “substantial shareholder” in CEFC International Limited

along with Ye.381 It is unclear whether Hunter Biden was half-owner of Hudson West III at that

time. However, starting on Aug. 8, the same day the $5 million was received, and continuing

through Sept. 25, 2018, Hudson West III sent frequent payments to Owasco, Hunter Biden’s

firm.

382

 These payments, which were described as consulting fees, reached $4,790,375.25 in just

over a year.383 

There are conflicting explanations for an additional $1 million sent to Hudson West III by

CEFC Limited Foundation (CEFC Limited) on Nov. 2, 2017, that appears to have been refunded

to CEFC Limited on Nov. 21, 2017 with a memo marked “refund.”384 According to records on

file with the Committees:

[Records indicated that] ‘CEFC paid the consultation fee to HW III

for the purpose of conducting a market investigation of [a] natural

gas project; however, the project was deemed unnecessary at the

time so CEFC Limited decided to postpone the market investigation.

Therefore, HW III provided the refund to CEFC Limited’. In

another email correspondence dated 4/2/2018, Mr. Biden stated that

the incoming wire amounting to $1MM on 11/2/2017 from CEFC

Limited foundation should have gone to Owasco LLC, however, he

provided the wrong wire instructions, and due to the large amount

 

375 Id. 

376 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.).

377 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

378 Id.

379 Zdravko Ljubas, China Development Bank’s Ex-Chief Suspected of Graft, ORGANIZED CRIME AND CORRUPTION REPORTING

PROJECT (Aug. 1, 2019), https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/10378-china-development-bank-s-ex-chief-suspected-of-graft.

380 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

381 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.).

382 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

383 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.).

384 Id.
79

the transactions was not corrected until 3/22/2018, which consisted

of an outgoing wire for the same amount benefiting Owasco LLC.385

On March 22, 2018, a $1 million payment was sent from Hudson West III to Owasco with a

memo line for “Dr Patrick Ho Chi Ping Representation.”386 In his alternative explanation,

Hunter Biden indicated that the misdirected $1 million was related to his representation of Ye’s

associate, Patrick Ho.387 These transactions illustrate the financial connections between

Gongwen Dong’s Hudson West III, Ye Jianming’s CEFC, and Hunter Biden’s Owasco. Biden

stated that: 

Boies Schiller Flexner is co-counsel for Dr. Patrick Ho’s case.

Hudson West III LLC has no involvement with Patrick Ho Chi

Ping[’]s case and won[’]t expect further transaction related to Dr.

Patrick Ho Chi Ping trail [sic] for Hudson West III LLC. Owasco

LLC and co- Counsel Boies Schiller Flexner will represent Dr.

Patrick Ho Chi Ping [at] trial.388

During the same period, there is also evidence that Hunter Biden moved large sums of

money from his firm, Owasco, to James Biden’s consulting firm, the Lion Hall Group.389 

Between Aug. 14, 2017 and Aug. 3, 2018, Owasco sent 20 wires totaling $1,398,999 to the Lion

Hall Group, a consulting firm that lists James Biden and his wife, Sara Biden, on the bank

account.390 This transaction was identified for potential criminal financial activity. These

transfers began less than one week after CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $5 million to

Hudson West III and Hudson West III sent its first payment of $400,000 to Owasco.391 Most of

the payments from Owasco to the Lion Hall Group had vague notes in the memo lines, 15 of

which simply indicated that they were for further credit to James Biden; however, the memo line

for one of the payments read “HW3,” which indicates some of the transferred money could be

from Hudson West III.392 When the bank contacted Sara Biden regarding the overall wire

activity, she stated that the Lion Hall Group and Owasco provide international and business

consulting and that the Lion Hall Group was assisting Owasco with an international client

through a contract that had since terminated.393 Sara Biden told the bank that she would not

provide any supporting documentation, and she also refused to provide additional information to

more clearly explain the activity.394 Consequently, the bank submitted the account for closure.395 

The Committees created the following chart with respect to this transaction. 

 

385 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.).

386 Id.

387 Id.

388 Id.

389 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 12 (on file with Comms.).

390 Id.

391 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 12 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

392 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 12 (on file with Comms.).

393 Id.

394 Id.

395 Id.
80

(20) wires ranging from 

$21,000.00 to $165,000.00 totaling 

$1,398,999.00

From 08/14/2017 – 08/03/2018

Notes: 

-15 of the 20 transactions list, “FFC JAMES BIDEN 

PAYMENT” in the Originator to Beneficiary Information 

section. 

Sara Jones Biden (Individual) 

Role: Subject

Accounts: One Bank Account

The Lion Hall Group LLC (Consulting Organization) 

City/Country: Merion Station, PA

Role: Subject

Accounts: One Bank Account

James B. Biden (Individual) 

Role: Subject

Accounts: One Bank Account

Owasco PC (Finance & Insurance Industry)

Owner: R Hunter Biden 

Accounts: Two Bank Accounts 

Hudson West III also sent funds directly to the Lion Hall Group. According to records

on file with the Committees, James B. Biden is the principal contact for the Lion Hall Group, and

between January 2018 and October 2018, Hudson West III sent the Lion Hall Group outgoing

wires totaling $76,746.15 with the memo, “office expense and reimbursement.”396 These

transactions illustrate a direct financial link between Hudson West III (which was connected to

CEFC, the Chinese government, and Gongwen Dong) and James Biden. 

On Aug. 17, 2017, three days after the first transfer from Owasco to The Lion Hall

Group, it was publicly announced that Ye’s CEFC Energy was in talks to purchase a stake in the

Russian state-owned energy company Rosneft, which, as noted, later fell through.397 

Around the same time, there were also outgoing wires from Hudson West III to various

accounts associated with Ye and Gongwen, including CEFC Infrastructure Investment,

Coldharbour Capital (located at Gongwen Dong’s address), Gongwen’s personal bank account, a

separate bank account for Hudson West V, and Bo Jian Group Investment Company (a company

with a complex ownership structure controlled by Ye in which Gongwen Dong is also reportedly

a part owner).398 These transactions and the transacting entities begin to paint a mosaic of the

complex corporate structure that existed between entities linked to Hunter Biden and his

associates and family and Chinese companies linked to the Communist government. 

iii. Financial Transactions by these Companies Illustrate a Complex Web of

Corporate Entities, Money Transfers and Potential Criminal Financial Activity.

The Committees were able to confirm that Hunter Biden’s associate, Gongwen Dong, is

connected to seven of the eight numbered Hudson West corporate entities. The exception is

 

396 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.).

397 Kane Wu, Exclusive: China’s CEFC in early talks to buy Rosneft stake- sources, REUTERS (Aug. 17, 2017),

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-m-a-china/exclusive-chinas-cefc-in-early-talks-to-buy-rosneft-stake-sourcesidUSKCN1AX1CP.

398 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).
81

Hudson West II; however, that entity shares a permanent mailing address with Hudson West V,

which has a bank account that is connected to Gongwen. Thus, it appears that Hudson West II is

most likely connected to him. The Hudson West entities are important entities in the flow of

funds among and between Ye, Gongwen, and Hunter Biden and his associates. There are

frequent fund transfers across these numbered Hudson West entities, and transactions involving

all eight have been identified for potential criminal financial activity. For example, Hudson

West III was not the only Hudson West entity associated with CEFC, Ye’s business. According

to reporting, Hudson West V maintains an ownership interest in CEFC Infrastructure Investment,

a subsidiary of CEFC.

399

 By extension, this means Hudson West V is linked to Ye and the

aforementioned $5 million payment to Hudson West III on Aug. 8, 2017.400 Hudson West V

also reportedly had ownership in a series of other companies: Hudson West Partners LLC,

Hudson West Aggregator LLC, Hudson West VIII LLC, and Hudson West VII LLC which

begins to show the complex corporate structure at play.401

Between July 2017 and November 2018, Hudson West V received wires totaling

$20,310,396.79 with $20,893,505.07 leaving that same account.402 All but $259,845 of the total

amount transferred out of the account went to U.S. bank accounts for various LLCs, most of

which were documented to be involved in the business of real estate investment and

management.403 Several of those LLCs are also tied to Gongwen.

404

Twenty million dollars of the $20,310,396.79 going into the aforementioned Hudson

West V US account was transferred into that account from another Hudson West V account at

the Bank of China.405 Between Feb. 9, 2017, and April 12, 2017, a Hudson West V Bank of

China account received three incoming wires totaling $27,917,665.45 from an entity called

Kaiyan US Fund III LP and one wire for $100,000 from a company called Foxwood Asset

Management Co. Limited.406 Both Kaiyan US Fund III LP and Foxwood Asset Management Co

Limited have addresses in Beijing.407 On March 19, 2018, Kaiyan US Fund III LP also sent one

wire for $50,551.79 directly to a different account for Hudson West V, which is included in the

aforementioned $20,310,396.79 total of incoming wires for that account.408

These transactions offer a window into a much larger web of transactions carried out

among a vast network of corporate entities, many with complex ownership structures, variously

owned and operated by Gongwen Dong, Ye Jianming, an individual named Shan Gao, and other

individuals associated with CEFC China energy, Chinese state-owned enterprises, and unknown

 

399 Id.

400 See id.

401 Id. Records indicate that the ownership structures of Gongwen Dong’s companies are extraordinarily complex, and

sometimes unknown, and that many of his corporate entities have shifted over time. The same is true of Ye Jianming’s corporate

entities. The complexities illustrate the challenges in fully knowing the depth and extent of potential criminal activity.

402 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

403 See CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); see also CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.);

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 13 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).

404 Id.

405 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

406 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.).

407 Id.

408 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 2 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).
82

individuals based primarily in China.409 Little is known about Shan Gao, other than the fact that

banks found her, through complex ownership structures, to be the owner of multiple entities

involved in the transactions.410 For multiple entities involved in these transactions, banks were

not able to determine ownership at all.411

As an example of the size and scope of the networks involving Gongwen, between Oct.

23, 2017, and Dec. 20, 2018, Hudson West I, for which Gongwen is also listed as an account

signer, received incoming wires totaling over $114 million and sent outgoing wires totaling over

$113 million.

412

 Between Jan. 25, 2018, and Dec. 28, 2018, Hudson West Aggregator, another

LLC associated with Gongwen that was involved in three transactions with Hudson West V,

received incoming transfers totaling more than $3 million and sent outgoing transfers totaling

more than $13 million.

413

 Records examining these transactions by Gongwen and his associates

explained: 

We opt to include wires, which appear to be conducted for

investment purposes, as we believe that fund movement is

ultimately conducted in an effort to layer funds. Conclusion:

Unusual movement of funds between various entities with a

complex ownership structures, at times involving funds originating

from Chinese [state-owned enterprises] SOE, Chinese based entities

registered with [a] high-risk tax heaven country, and [politically

exposed persons] PEPs. It is to note that fund movement appears to

be an effort to introduce foreign funds from unknown sources into

in [sic] the U.S. by investing in large projects and by purchasing

luxury goods and properties. Total [] filing amounts to

$902,200,297.414

Certain transactions involving Hudson West III, CEFC Infrastructure, and Hudson West V were

among those identified as potential efforts to layer funds.

415

 

409 See CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); see also CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.);

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 13 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).

410Id. According to records on file with the Committees, Shan Gao is a resident of New York State whose permanent/mailing

address matches the address of Gongwen Dong. CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 8 (on file with Comms.).

411 See CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.); see also CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.);

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 13 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).

412 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).

413 Id. (In addition to the aforementioned numbered Hudson West entities and Hudson West Aggregator, Hudson West Partners

LLC is another Hudson West entity with a bank account that is connected to Gongwen Dong.).

414 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).

415 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 11 (on file with Comms.); CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 14 (on file with Comms.).
83

iv. Chinese Nationals Linked with Hunter Biden Faced Criminal Probes.

In November 2017, Ye Jianming’s associate and Hunter Biden’s reported client, Patrick

Ho, was arrested and charged with violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, international

money laundering, and conspiracy to commit both.416 The first call that he reportedly made was

to James Biden, who reportedly referred him to Hunter Biden.417 Ho was convicted in March

2019 on charges of money laundering, conspiracy, and violations of the Foreign Corrupt

Practices Act and was sentenced to three years in U.S. prison for his role in a multimillion-dollar

scheme to bribe officials in Chad and Uganda in exchange for business advantages for CEFC,

Ye’s company.

418

 Department of Justice documents describe Ye as Patrick Ho’s boss and, again,

note that Ye’s company supplied funding to the China Energy Fund Committee.419 Ho worked

as the secretary-general of the committee during the period when he was carrying out his illegal

schemes.420 

In February 2018, it was reported that Ye was also under investigation in China for

“suspected economic crimes.”421 Ye was subsequently detained, and to date, there have been no

reports of his release.

Shortly thereafter, on May 4, 2018, there were reports that the deal for CEFC to purchase

a stake in Rosneft had fallen through.422 The credit cards used by the Bidens for the $100,000

spending spree were closed the same month, and the last payments for the account were made on

May 25, 2018.423 It is not clear who made the fund transfer payments that were used to cover the

charges.424 

After Ye was detained by the Chinese government in February 2018, there were reports

that Shanghai Guosheng Group, a Chinese agency reportedly controlled by Shanghai’s municipal

government, had taken over management and daily operations at CEFC.425 Additionally, in

 

416 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Head of Organization Backed By Chinese Energy Conglomerate And Former Foreign

Minister of Senegal, Charged with Bribing High-Level African Officials (Nov. 20, 2017), https://www.justice.gov/usaosdny/pr/head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-and-former-foreign-minister.

417 Alexandra Stevenson, David Barboza, Matthew Goldstein, and Paul Mozur, A Chinese Tycoon Sought Power and Influence.

Washington Responded., THE NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 12, 2018),

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/business/cefc-biden-china-washington-ye-jianming.html.

418 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Patrick Ho, Former Head Of Organization Backed By Chinese Energy Conglomerate,

Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison For International Bribery And Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/patrick-ho-former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-3.

419 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Just., Former Head of Organization Backed by Chinese Energy Conglomerate Sentenced to

Three Years in Prison for International Bribery and Money Laundering Offenses (Mar. 25, 2019),

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-head-organization-backed-chinese-energy-conglomerate-sentenced-three-years-prison.

420 Id.

421 Benjamin Kang Lim, China’s CEFC chairman investigated for suspected economic crimes: source, REUTERS (Feb. 28, 2018),

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-probe-idUSKCN1GD3O9.

422 Javier Blas and Elena Mazneva, Qatar StepsIn to Buy Rosneft Stake After China Deal Collapses, BLOOMBERG (May 5, 2018),

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-04/china-s-cefc-won-t-buy-rosneft-shares-from-glencore-led-group.

423 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 9 (on file with Comms.).

424 Id. (The funds used to collateralize the account were returned in the form of a check payable to Hudson West III and Robert

H. Biden and deposited back into the same account from which they were initially withdrawn.).

425 Josephine Mason and Aizhu Chen, China’s CEFC taken over by Shanghai government agency: SCMP report, REUTERS (Mar.

2, 2018), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-probe/chinas-cefc-taken-over-by-shanghai-government-agency-scmpreport-idUSKCN1GE0X3.
84

March 2018, it was announced that the Chinese state-owned enterprise Citic Group was

negotiating to take a stake of up to 49 percent in CEFC’s European unit.426 Again, Citic is listed

among the Chinese partners and alliances of the Thornton group.427 Following these Chinese

government takeovers, the payments from Hudson West III to Owasco appear to have continued

through September 2018.428

e. Conclusion

The records acquired by the Committees show that Hunter Biden and his family were

involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign

governments across the globe. Hunter Biden and Archer, in particular, formed significant and

consistent financial relationships with the corrupt oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during their time

working for Burisma and their firms made millions of dollars from that association while Joe

Biden was vice president and the public face of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. 

Rosemont Seneca Thornton, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received $3.5

million in a wire transfer from Elena Baturina, who allegedly received illegal construction

contracts from her husband, the former mayor of Moscow. Moreover, Archer’s apparent receipt

of money for a car from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan while Vice President Biden was in

Kyiv is especially concerning in light of the timing. And finally, Biden and Archer’s work with

Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections

that accelerated while his father was vice president and continued after he left office.

Biden and Archer found willing partners in Chinese nationals connected to the

Communist regime. Their work in China began at least in 2009, with the creation of Rosemont

Seneca Partners with Heinz, Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson. Then, several years later,

Biden and Archer formed BHR with Bohai Capital and received their business license approval

in China shortly after Biden visited China with his father, Vice President Biden. 

Hunter Biden’s connections and financial associations appear to have accelerated

significantly after he associated himself with Ye Jianming, who had deep connections with the

Communist regime and PLA. However, that didn’t seem to have any impact on Hunter Biden,

who made millions from the relationship. Indeed, Hunter Biden and his family, to include James

and Sara Biden, associated with other Chinese nationals such as Gongwen Dong. In one case,

the three of them went on a $100,000 global spending spree after Gongwen Dong and Hunter

Biden opened a joint account. In addition, Hunter Biden received millions of dollars over a

period of years from Gongwen Dong’s companies. According to records acquired by the

Committees, many of these transactions involved potential criminal financial activity.

The records acquired by the Committees show consistent, significant and extensive

financial connections among and between Hunter Biden, James Biden, Sara Biden, Devon

Archer, and Chinese nationals connected to the Communist regime and PLA as well as other

foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds. These connections and the vast amount of

 

426 Chen Aizu, CITIC Group in talks for up to 49 percent stake in CEFC unit, REUTERS (Mar. 20, 2018),

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-cefc-citic-group/citic-group-in-talks-for-up-to-49-percent-stake-in-cefc-unitidUSKBN1GW0I8.

427 Alliances/Clients, Thornton Group, http://www.thorntonai.com/english/alliances.html.

428 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT 7 (on file with Comms.).
85

money transferred among and between them don’t just raise conflicts of interest concerns, they

raise criminal financial, counterintelligence and extortion concerns. The Committees will

continue to evaluate the evidence in their possession. 
86

XII. CONCLUSION.

As the Chairmen’s report details, Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board negatively

impacted the efforts of dedicated career-service individuals who were fighting to push for

anticorruption measures in Ukraine. Because the vice president’s son had a direct link to a

corrupt company and its owner, State Department officials were required to maintain situational

awareness of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma. Unfortunately, U.S. officials had no

other choice but to endure the “awkward[ness]” of continuing to push an anticorruption agenda

in Ukraine while the vice president’s son sat on the board of a Ukrainian company with a corrupt

owner. As George Kent testified, he “would have advised any American not to get on the board

of Zlochevsky’s company.”

429

 Yet, even though Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma’s board

cast a shadow over the work of those advancing anticorruption reforms in Ukraine, the

Committees are only aware of two individuals who raised concerns to their superiors. Despite

the efforts of these individuals, their concerns appear to have fallen on deaf ears.

Former Secretary Kerry’s December 2019 denial of having any knowledge about Hunter

Biden or Burisma is inconsistent with the evidence uncovered by the Committees. Kerry was

briefed about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Christopher Heinz the day after Burisma announced

Hunter Biden joined its board. Additionally, Secretary Kerry’s senior advisor sent him press

clips and articles relating to Hunter Biden’s board membership. This appears to be yet another

example of high-ranking Obama administration officials blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s

association with Burisma.

 Several witnesses highlighted efforts to enable a successful investigation of Zlochevsky,

and also noted that the U.S. decision to condition a $1 billion loan guarantee was made in part

because of the then-Ukrainian prosecutor general’s failure to pursue a case against Zlochevsky. 

But at the end of the day, between 2014 through 2017, despite the concerted effort of many U.S.

officials, not one of the three different Ukrainian prosecutor generals held Zlochevsky

accountable.

The Obama administration and the Democrat lobby shop Blue Star Strategies had

consistent and extensive contact with Andrii Telizhenko over a period of years. Yet despite

these well-documented contacts with Democratic officials, Democrats have attempted to impugn

this investigation for having received some Blue Star-related records from Telizhenko. Some

Democrats have even (incorrectly) identified Telizhenko as the Committees’ “star witness.”430 

Although he produced a small number of Blue Star-related records to the Committees, the

Committees never interviewed him as part of this investigation.431 

 

429 George Kent Testimony at 110. 

430Ranking Member Ron Wyden, Wyden Takes to Senate Floor to Address Russian Disinformation in Flawed Congressional

Investigation, 2020 Election (Sept. 16, 2020), https://www.finance.senate.gov/wyden-takes-to-senate-floor-to-address-russiandisinformation-in-flawed-congressional-investigation-2020-election.

431 The Committees received a small number of records from Telizhenko related to his communications with and subsequent

work for Blue Star Strategies. Ranking Member Peters and Ranking Member Wyden have access to these records but have

refused to receive or review them. Had they done so, they would have observed that the State Department, National Archives,

and Blue Star Strategies (after it received a subpoena) produced most of the same records to the Committees. They also would

have noticed the emails and text messages that Blue Star failed to produce to the Committees. 
87

Even though almost all of the Committees’ records are from U.S. agencies and U.S.

officials or persons, Democrats have repeatedly misconstrued the facts of this investigation and

have smeared it as a Russian disinformation campaign. In doing so, they conveniently have

ignored their own long history of meeting with Telizhenko and his yearlong work for a Democrat

lobby shop. If Democrats are concerned that Telizhenko presents any risk of advancing

disinformation, it is notable that the Ranking Members have not expressed any curiosity about

his work with the Obama administration or Blue Star Strategies.

The records acquired by the Committees also show that Hunter Biden and his family

were involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign

governments across the globe. Hunter Biden and Devon Archer, in particular, formed significant

and consistent financial relationships with the corrupt oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky during their

time working for Burisma, and their firms made millions of dollars from that association while

Joe Biden was vice president and the public face of the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. 

Rosemont Seneca Thornton, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, received $3.5

million in a wire transfer from Elena Baturina, who allegedly received illegal construction

contracts from her husband, the then-mayor of Moscow. Moreover, Archer’s apparent receipt of

money for a car from Kenges Rakishev of Kazakhstan while Vice President Biden was in Kyiv is

especially concerning in light of the timing. And finally, Biden and Archer’s work with Chinese

nationals connected to the Communist regime illustrate the deep financial connections that

accelerated while Joe Biden was vice president and continued after he left office.

The Chairmen’s investigation has faced many obstacles from the minority and from

executive agencies that have failed to comply with document requests. Accordingly, there

remains much work to be done.