alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joremi Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v M. Richard Abraitys, as Assessor of the Town of Ossining, et al., Respondents.

In a consolidated proceeding to review tax assessments on certain real property for the tax years 1974/1975 and 1975/1976, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 16, 1976, which (1) precluded petitioner from introducing evidence with respect to the value of the subject vacant real property, (2) dismissed the petitions with respect to the tax years 1974/1975, 1975/1976 and 1976/1977, with prejudice, and (3) denied petitioner’s motion to vacate the dismissal of the petitions. Judgment modified by (1) deleting the second and third decretal paragraphs thereof and substituting therefor a provision that petitioner’s motion to vacate the dismissal of the petitions is granted and (2) deleting from the first decretal paragraph thereof the word "herein” and substituting therefor the following: "of its appraisal report or expert testimony”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Petitioner failed to file a timely appraisal report with the trial court pursuant to 22 NYCRR 678.1. At the date of trial the petitioner sought an adjournment of one month in order to file the appraisal report, alleging that additional time was needed to consider the ramifications that newly discovered information would have on the "valuation” of the subject vacant realty. The trial court denied the petitioner’s motion for an adjournment, precluded any evidence on the valuation issue and dismissed the petitions with prejudice. Although the petitioner failed to demonstrate the requisite good cause that would entitle it to an extension of time to file its appraisal report, we do not find that such preclusion forecloses all litigation (see *Fiesinger v State of New York,*88 Mise 2d 557, 560, n 1; cf. *Matter of White Plains Props. Corp. v Tax Assessor of City of White Plains,*-58 AD2d 871, 872-875 [dissenting memorandum of Justices Shapiro and Suozzi]). Therefore the petitions *835should be reinstated and the proceeding should proceed to trial. In any event, Special Term’s dismissal of the petition pertaining to the 1976/1977 assessment was error since that petition had not been consolidated for trial with the petitions for the tax years 1974/1975 and 1975/1976. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
#### § 1423.16 Rights of parties.

A party shall have the right to appear at any hearing in person, by counsel, or by other representative, and to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce into the record documentary or other relevant evidence, and to submit rebuttal evidence, except that the participation of any party shall be limited to the extent prescribed by the Administrative Law Judge. Two (2) copies of documentary evidence shall be submitted and a copy furnished to each of the other parties. Stipulations of fact may be introduced in evidence with respect to any issue.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3999 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3999

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                          mortgage insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2012

  Mr. Barrow introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                          mortgage insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORTGAGE INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Subclause (I) of section 163(h)(3)(E)(iv) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 
2011'' and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or accrued after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Tivic Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Ernst, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                      

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  March 31, 2022 | By: | /s/ Jennifer Ernst                                       
|--------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Jennifer Ernst                                           
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)



|Date:  March 31, 2022 | By: | /s/ Briana Benz                                                         
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Briana Benz                                                             
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
"Pathfinder
Reservoir

Seminoe
Reservoir

p+ +.

/SWEETWATER
CARBON

Wildlife Habitat Management Areas || Research Area
1. Chain Lakes 7 Stratton Sagebrush Steppe
2 Red Rim-Daley
3. Grizzly Allotment HE Management Areas
4 Pennock Mountain 8 High Savery Dam
5 Wick-Beumee 9 JO Ranch Site
6 Laramie Peak 10 Rawlins OHV Area

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Medicine Bow

Miles

Map 2-10
Other Special Management Areas
Alternative 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

GARY PAVLIC,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN F. BELL, ET AL,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 524 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41278 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
BERNABE TAPIA

- OSORIO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 265

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Bernabe Tapia

- Osorio raises an argument that is foreclosed by 

### United States v. Martinez

- Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204

- 05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 136 S. Ct. 533 (2015)

. In Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d at 204

- 05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior offense required

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41278 Document: 00513472193 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 41278

2 proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, the motion for
summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41278 Document: 00513472193 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Joseph P. SlatteryJoseph P. SlatteryExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Bell Television, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Cal-New Yorker, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Order entered on September 15, 1960, denying, as academic, defendants-respondents’ motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur—-Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water levels and artesianpressure in observation wells in the United States. Part 6, Southwestern statesand territory of Hawaii.**
 
1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949
1950 | 1951 | 1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104682
 
August 22, 2019
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 21

- 00293

- CV

__________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF ISRAEL ESCOBAR

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 06

- 10

- 09712

- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
Israel Escobar filed a motion to dismiss his appeal in a civil case. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Escobar filed his motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f ).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 27, 2021 Opinion Delivered October 28, 2021 Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., the
sole Manager of Vestin Fund III, LLC (the Registrant), and Lance K. Bradford,
as Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that  (1)
    
    the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the
applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant. Dated: May 17, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael V. Shustek
Michael V. Shustek*
Chief Executive Officer
of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,
Manager of the RegistrantDated: May 17, 2004
    
    /s/ Lance K. Bradford
Lance K. Bradford*
Chief Financial Officer
of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,
Manager of the Registrant
 * Michael V. Shustek and Lance K. Bradford function, respectively, as the
equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 4 of 6
Mailing Information for a Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP 

Electronic Mail Notice List 

The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. 

z Steve W. Berman 

steve@hbsslaw.com,robert@hbsslaw.com,heatherw@hbsslaw.com 

z Jessamyn Sheli Berniker 

jberniker@wc.com 

z Simon J. Frankel 

sfrankel@cov.com,ncutright@cov.com 

z William M. Goodman 

wgoodman@kasowitz.com,anathan@kasowitz.com,aajmani@kasowitz.com 

z Lance A Harke 

lharke@harkeclasby.com 

z George W. Hicks , Jr

ghicks@wc.com 

z Reed R. Kathrein 

reed@hbsslaw.com,pashad@hbsslaw.com,sf_filings@hbsslaw.com 

z Jeffrey G. Knowles 

EfilingJGK@cpdb.com,cyf@cpdb.com 

z Douglass A. Kreis 

dkreis@aws-law.com,aclifton@awkolaw.com,jwitkin@aws-law.com,rbaggett@awslaw.com,cbrumfield@awkolaw.com 

z Kim Elaine Miller 

kimmiller225@yahoo.com,kim.miller@ksfcounsel.com,ecf.notices@ksfcounsel.com 

z Conor Patrick Moore 

ef-cpm@cpdb.com,ef-cpm@cpdb.com 

z David S. Nalven 

davidn@hbsslaw.com,debrag@hbsslaw.com,heatherc@hbsslaw.com,jessicao@hbsslaw.com,kristenj@hbsslaw.com 

z Richard S. Scott 

rscott@wc.com,clanza-weil@wc.com 

z Thomas M. Sobol 

tom@hbsslaw.com,adama@hbsslaw.com,heatherc@hbsslaw.com,allisonl@hbsslaw.com,jessicao@hbsslaw.com 

z Gerson Avery Zweifach 

gzweifach@wc.com 

Manual Notice List 

The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require 

manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order 

to create notices or labels for these recipients. 

Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 5 of 6
Kristen Johnson Parker 

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP 

55 Cambridge Parkway 

Suite 301 

Cambridge, MA 02141 

Ethan M. Posner 

Covington & Burling LLP 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2401 

Case 3:08-cv-02376-MHP Document 175 Filed 05/25/10 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of
Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                        |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |     |  |                           
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton   
|                        |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton       
|                        |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
#### § 233.07 Fiscal Agent obligations.

Failure of the Fiscal Agent to perform any of its obligations pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall not impair any Noteholder's rights under this Guarantee, but may be the subject of action for damages against the Fiscal Agent by USAID as a result of such failure or neglect. A Noteholder may appoint the Fiscal Agent to make demand for payment on its behalf under this Guarantee.
#### § 221.31 Prosecution of claims.

After payment by A.I.D. to an Applicant pursuant to § 221.21, A.I.D. shall have exclusive power to prosecute all claims related to rights to receive payments under the Eligible Notes to which it is thereby subrogated. If a Noteholder continues to have an interest in the outstanding Eligible Notes, such a Noteholder and A.I.D. shall consult with each other with respect to their respective interests in such Eligible Notes and the manner of and responsibility for prosecuting claims.
#### § 232.07 Fiscal agent obligations.

Failure of the Fiscal Agent to perform any of its obligations pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall not impair any Noteholder's rights under this Guarantee, but may be the subject of action for damages against the Fiscal Agent by USAID as a result of such failure or neglect. A Noteholder may appoint the Fiscal Agent to make demand for payment on its behalf under this Guarantee.
### §247b–11. Effects of folic acid in prevention of birth defects

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall expand and intensify programs (directly or through grants or contracts) for the following purposes:

(1) To provide education and training for health professionals and the general public for purposes of explaining the effects of folic acid in preventing birth defects and for purposes of encouraging each woman of reproductive capacity (whether or not planning a pregnancy) to consume on a daily basis a dietary supplement that provides an appropriate level of folic acid.

(2) To conduct research with respect to such education and training, including identifying effective strategies for increasing the rate of consumption of folic acid by women of reproductive capacity.

(3) To conduct research to increase the understanding of the effects of folic acid in preventing birth defects, including understanding with respect to cleft lip, cleft palate, and heart defects.

(4) To provide for appropriate epidemiological activities regarding folic acid and birth defects, including epidemiological activities regarding neural tube defects.

#### (b) Consultations with States and private entities

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the States and with other appropriate public or private entities, including national nonprofit private organizations, health professionals, and providers of health insurance and health plans.

#### (c) Technical assistance

The Secretary may (directly or through grants or contracts) provide technical assistance to public and nonprofit private entities in carrying out the activities described in subsection (a).

#### (d) Evaluations

The Secretary shall (directly or through grants or contracts) provide for the evaluation of activities under subsection (a) in order to determine the extent to which such activities have been effective in carrying out the purposes of the program under such subsection, including the effects on various demographic populations. Methods of evaluation under the preceding sentence may include surveys of knowledge and attitudes on the consumption of folic acid and on blood folate levels. Such methods may include complete and timely monitoring of infants who are born with neural tube defects.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §317J, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. A, title VI, §601, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1118.)
### §254v. Clarification regarding service in schools and other community-based settings

#### (a) Schools and community-based settings

An entity to which a participant in the Scholarship Program or the Loan Repayment Program (referred to in this section as a "participant") is assigned under section 254f of this title may direct such participant to provide service as a behavioral or mental health professional at a school or other community-based setting located in a health professional shortage area.

#### (b) Obligated service

#### (1) In general

Any service described in subsection (a) that a participant provides may count towards such participant's completion of any obligated service requirements under the Scholarship Program or the Loan Repayment Program, subject to any limitation imposed under paragraph (2).

#### (2) Limitation

The Secretary may impose a limitation on the number of hours of service described in subsection (a) that a participant may credit towards completing obligated service requirements, provided that the limitation allows a member to credit service described in subsection (a) for not less than 50 percent of the total hours required to complete such obligated service requirements.

#### (c) Rule of construction

The authorization under subsection (a) shall be notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart or subpart II.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §338N, as added Pub. L. 115–271, title VII, §7072, Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4030.)