alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**GAO-11-732R**                      Published: Jul 29, 2011. Publicly Released: Jul 29, 2011.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This report responds to Congress' March 2010 request related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) efforts to delegate grants administration responsibilities to its regions. Specifically, we are reporting on (1) the extent to which FEMA has operationalized delegation of grants administration responsibilities for preparedness grants to the regions, and (2) the extent to which FEMA has assessed the regions' capacity to assume increased responsibility for administration of preparedness grants.

## Full Report

Full Report (42 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Homeland Security

Emergency preparednessFederal aid programsFederal aid to localitiesFinancial managementFunds managementGrant administrationGrant monitoringGrants to statesInternal controlsProgram managementRegional development programsRegional planningStandards
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEENAN WILKINS,

Plaintiff,

    v.

SHERIFF GREG AHERN, et al.,

Defendants._______________________________                                

)))))))))) 

No. C 08-1084 MMC (PR)  

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OFTIME TO FILE SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

(Docket No. 167)

Good cause appearing, defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a motion

for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.  Defendants shall file a motion for summary

judgment no later than February 15, 2010.  In accordance with the Court’s prior Order

Setting Briefing Schedule, filed November 2, 2009, plaintiff shall file opposition to the

motion within sixty days of the date the motion is filed.  Defendants shall file a reply within

twenty days of the date the opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket No. 167.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 27, 2010_________________________MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01084-MMC   Document 168   Filed 01/27/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-08T15:00:21-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 233.06 Transferability of Guarantee; Note Register.

A Noteholder may assign, transfer or pledge an Eligible Note to any Person. Any such assignment, transfer or pledge shall be effective on the date that the name of the new Noteholder is entered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement. USAID shall be entitled to treat the Persons in whose names the Eligible Notes are registered as the owners thereof for all purposes of this Guarantee and USAID shall not be affected by notice to the contrary.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Order Re Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference

Case No. 08-CV-00177-SI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH, and 

IVA CHIU, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, a limited liability 

partnership; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

CASE NO.: C-08-00177 SI 

ORDER RE: 

PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO CONTINUE THE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Hon. Judge Susan Illston 

After reviewing Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion, the Court finds that for good cause shown, 

the following shall occur: 

The Case Management Conference currently set for October 9, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. is vacated. 

The Case Management Conference is re-set to ________________________________________. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ _________________________________ 

Hon. Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-00177-SI Document 311 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TSEGAI HAILE,

Plaintiff,

    v.

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, etal.,

Defendants                                                                      /

No. C-08-4149 MMC

ORDER SETTING APRIL 30, 2010HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONFOR NEW TRIAL

On March 9, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for new trial, but failed to set the matter for

hearing on the Court’s calendar.  See Civil L.R. 7-2(a) (providing “all motions must be filed,

served and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not

less than 35 days after service of the motion).

In the interests of having the motion heard without further delay, the Court hereby

SETS the matter for hearing on April 30, 2010, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  March 15, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04149-MMC   Document 179   Filed 03/15/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T01:50:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
§ 229.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 229.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 229.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 229.300 through 229.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 229.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
### §285i–1. Clinical research on eye care and diabetes

#### (a) Program of grants

The Director of the Institute, in consultation with the advisory council for the Institute, may award research grants to one or more Diabetes Eye Research Institutions for the support of programs in clinical or health services aimed at—

(1) providing comprehensive eye care services for people with diabetes, including a full complement of preventive, diagnostic and treatment procedures;

(2) developing new and improved techniques of patient care through basic and clinical research;

(3) assisting in translation of the latest research advances into clinical practice; and

(4) expanding the knowledge of the eye and diabetes through further research.

#### (b) Use of funds

Amounts received under a grant awarded under this section shall be used for the following:

(1) Establishing the biochemical, cellular, and genetic mechanisms associated with diabetic eye disease and the earlier detection of pending eye abnormalities. The focus of work under this paragraph shall require that ophthalmologists have training in the most up-to-date molecular and cell biological methods.

(2) Establishing new frontiers in technology, such as video-based diagnostic and research resources, to—

(A) provide improved patient care;

(B) provide for the evaluation of retinal physiology and its affect on diabetes; and

(C) provide for the assessment of risks for the development and progression of diabetic eye disease and a more immediate evaluation of various therapies aimed at preventing diabetic eye disease.

Such technologies shall be designed to permit evaluations to be performed both in humans and in animal models.

(3) The translation of the results of vision research into the improved care of patients with diabetic eye disease. Such translation shall require the application of institutional resources that encompass patient care, clinical research and basic laboratory research.

(4) The conduct of research concerning the outcomes of eye care treatments and eye health education programs as they relate to patients with diabetic eye disease, including the evaluation of regional approaches to such research.

#### (c) Authorized expenditures

The purposes for which a grant under subsection (a) may be expended include equipment for the research described in such subsection.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §456, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title XI, §1101(a), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 168.)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4413 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain undyed acrylic staple 

fibers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain 

undyed acrylic staple fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNDYED ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.24 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain undyed acrylic staple fibers) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4413 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Test Dates

C Line Scrubber 

610 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Scrubber 

611 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Scrubber 

502 (MCEM 

lb/hr)

C Line Scrubber 

511 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Scrubber 

603 

(MCEM lb/hr)

November 2011 

(Run 1) 0.043

November 2011 

(Run 2) 0.041

March 2012 (Run 

01) 0.009

March 2012 (Run 

2) 0.010

March 2012 (Run 

3) 0.008

March 2012 (Run 

4) 0.012

C Line Wet Scrubbers Tests

Test Dates (Run 

No.)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 5 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 15 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 27 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 6 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 16 

(MCEM lb/hr)

November 2011 

(Run 01) 0.136 0.303 0.078

March 2012 (Run 

01) 0.047 0.288 0.087

March 2012 (Run 

02) 0.034 0.039

March 2012 (Run 

03)

Summary of Intalco POM source testing results

C Line Dry Scrubber Tests

# C line 

scrubbers 

operating on 

test days Hrs in Month lbs emitted in Month

C Line, Al Tons 

produced in Month

Potline lbs 

pollutant/ton Al 

produced

( lb/hr) x (# operating 

scrubs) x (# Hrs in month 

)

(lbs pollutant emitted in 

Month) / (Tons Al 

produced in Month)

44 720 1362.24 7061 0.193

44 720 1298.88 7061 0.184

44 744 294.624 7677 0.038

44 744 327.36 7677 0.043

44 744 261.888 7677 0.034

44 744 392.83 7677 0.051

Average for 6 

separate test runs 0.091

Standard Deviation 

for 6 test runs 0.076

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 25 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 36 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet 

Scrubber 46 

(MCEM lb/hr)

C Line Wet Scrubber 

57 (MCEM 

lb/hr)

Average for Test 

Run

0.172

0.141

0.100 0.058

0.064 0.093 0.092 0.083
Total (Wet and Dry Scrubbers

Total Potline C - Average plus 3 
# C line scrubbers 

operating on test day

Hrs in 

Nov.

lbs emitted in 

Month

C Line, Al 

Tons 

produced 

in Month

Potline lbs 

MCEM/ton Al 

produced

( lb/hr) x (# operating 

scrubs) x (# Hrs in 

month )

(lbs pollutant emitted in 

Month) / (Tons Al 

produced in Month)

49 720 6079.92 7061 0.86

49 744 5128.14 7677 0.67

49 744 2102.30 7677 0.27

48 744 2964.10 7677 0.39

0.55

0.27

Average for 4 separate test 

runs

Standard Deviation for 4 test 

runs
0.64

1.7

Total (Wet and Dry Scrubbers) Potline C - Average MCEM lb/ton

Total Potline C - Average plus 3 standard deviations MCEM lb/ton
### §18351. Continuation of the International Space Station

#### (a) Policy of the United States

It shall be the policy of the United States, in consultation with its international partners in the ISS program, to support full and complete utilization of the ISS through at least September 30, 2030.

#### (b) NASA action

In furtherance of the policy set forth in subsection (a), NASA shall—

(1) pursue international, commercial, and intragovernmental means to maximize ISS logistics supply, maintenance, and operational capabilities, reduce risks to ISS systems sustainability, and offset and minimize United States operations costs relating to the ISS;

(2) utilize, to the extent practicable, the ISS for the development of capabilities and technologies needed for the future of human space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit; and

(3) utilize, if practical and cost effective, the ISS for Science Mission Directorate missions in low-Earth orbit.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title V, §501, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2822; Pub. L. 114–90, title I, §114(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 715; Pub. L. 115–10, title III, §301(c), Mar. 21, 2017, 131 Stat. 23; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VII, §10815(a), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1737.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–167 substituted "September 30, 2030" for "2024".

2017—Pub. L. 115–10 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) Policy of the United States.—It shall be the policy of the United States, in consultation with its international partners in the ISS program, to support full and complete utilization of the ISS through at least 2024.

"(b) NASA Actions.—In furtherance of the policy set forth in subsection (a), NASA shall pursue international, commercial, and intragovernmental means to maximize ISS logistics supply, maintenance, and operational capabilities, reduce risks to ISS systems sustainability, and offset and minimize United States operations costs relating to the ISS."

2015—Pub. L. 114–90, §114(b)(1)(A), struck out "through 2020" after "Station" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–90, §114(b)(1)(B), substituted "through at least 2024" for "through at least 2020".
November 12, 2015

Dear Mr. Peraza:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 1487). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s)(i.e., fi xed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 12/27/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
#### David Garcia et al., v. George Deibert.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Exhibit 32



COMMUNITYCORP



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1 |  | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This 11thday of August 2003



|/s/    W. ROGER
CROOK                               
|----------------------------------------------------
|W. Roger Crook President and Chief Executive Officer



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    GWEN P.
BUNTON                    
|Gwen P. Bunton Vice President and Cashier



19
Case 3:08-cv-00938-JL Document 65 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-00938-JL Document64 Filed06/11/10 Page3 of 4
Case3:08-cv-00938-JL Document64 Filed06/11/10 Page4 of 4

 Jume 21, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-00938-JL Document 65 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 39.41 Special enforcement authority for systemically important derivatives clearing organizations.

For purposes of enforcing the provisions of Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act, a systemically important derivatives clearing organization shall be subject to, and the Commission has authority under the provisions of subsections (b) through (n) of section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818) in the same manner and to the same extent as if the systemically important derivatives clearing organization were an insured depository institution and the Commission were the appropriate Federal banking agency for such insured depository institution.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VECTREN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF ALAMEDA,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-03137 SI

ORDER

IT IS HERE BY ORDERED that the Judgment entered in this case is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03137-SI Document 219 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Company, Relator, v. Walter H. Knapp and Others, as Members of the State Tax Commission, and Another, Respondents.

Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Berrian, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 294]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered September 2, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The challenged portions of the People’s examination of witnesses and their summation could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial in view of the court’s curative actions in each instance as well as the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.