alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 29, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00447

- CR

Jeremiah HINDMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

From the 226th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR11519

Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the c ourt’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 29, 2015

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th 27 day of July, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Case 3:07-mj-70026-MAG   Document 42   Filed 04/20/07   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-mj-70026-MAG   Document 42   Filed 04/20/07   Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


• the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended September 30, 2024 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:November 4, 2024By/s/ Dino E. RobustoDino E. RobustoChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 045 5 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NEIL LYNN NUNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including Junes 29 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 2 2023

06/02/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0455
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF JEFFERY M. JACKSON

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
Jeffery M. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|/s/JEFFERY M. JACKSONJeffery M. Jackson
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2006 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jerry Tyson, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the trial court. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the May Term, beginning April 24, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant’s *coram nobis*application. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER

May 12, 2014

Before

 DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

No.: 13-3005

ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, LLC, an

Indiana limited liability company, doing business as

PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INCORPORATED, et al., 

Defendants - Appellants

 Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-00296-JVB-RBC

Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

District Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT ERRORS IN MAY 9, 2014

OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT, filed on May 12, 2014, by counsel for the

defendants,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the word "judgment" is replaced

with "preliminary injunction" in the final sentence of the court's opinion and the first

sentence of the court's judgment, both dated May 9, 2014. The final sentence in this

court's opinion is AMENDED to read: "We REMAND the case with instructions to

vacate the preliminary judgment and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal

jurisdiction." The first sentence in the court's judgment is AMENDED to read: "The

case is REMANDED with instructions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the

complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction." 

form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)
#### In the Matter of Nicholas Fabijanic, as President of Engineers Union, Local 444, IUE, AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioners, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review three orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board (one as to each petitioner), all dated December 21, 1976, each of which affirmed an order (one as to each petitioner) of the State Division of Human Rights, dated September 25, 1975, dismissing, after an investigation and upon a finding that no probable cause existed, a complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice, relating to employment, because of sex. *928Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. There is no indication that the action of the State Human Rights Appeal Board was arbitrary, capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion. In our view the record on this proceeding demonstrates that the complaints lacked merit (see *Pember v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 50*AD2d *903; State Div. of Human Rights v Buffalo Auto Glass Co.,*42 AD2d 678). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The parties were expressly requested to limit their answers “to what is disclosed in the

existing summary judgment record.” Despite this clear request, the Schwab defendants cited to

and filed a new declaration — the Taylor Declaration. If this was intended to simply supply

convenient copies of material already in the summary judgment record, the Court thanks counsel,

although it was unnecessary. The declaration, however, appears to include material that was

not in the existing summary judgment record. The Schwab defendants, by NOON TODAY, shall

please (1) file a declaration reciting where each precise item in the Taylor Declaration can already

be found in the existing summary judgment record, and (2) SHOW CAUSE why each item not in the

existing summary judgment record should not be stricken.

If plaintiffs reference to material outside the existing summary judgment record, also

please advise by NOON TODAY. For example, was the Charles Schwab New Guide to Financial

Independence quote in the existing summary judgment record?

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 580 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

135)IV-E-8 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:55 PM Sheet 135 of 242 
P.2 

SB 

%«* ^ 

£-07-X I 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

SEP I 4I98T 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Mitsubishi Chemical Regarding Onboard 

Proposal 

FROM: 

TO: 

Kathleen A. Steilen, chemical Engineer Xa-fcA-U^ (I . >6*ajju.v 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

The Record 

THRU: Glenn W. Passavant, Senior Proje 

Standards Development and Stippor 

Chester J. France, Chief 

Standards Development anc}/S~upi 

Manage 

:a 

r $lrlmmAr,tA> latAmSrSAt*rmirrmr\ 

On September 1, 1987, I met with Ken Von Hertsenberg and 

Daisuke Yoshizawa of Mitsubishi Corporation and Akira. Ikeda and 

Yoshimi Shibata of Mitsubishi Chemical industries Limited at 

EPA's Motor Vehicle Emission Laboratory in Ann Arbor regarding 

EPA's onboard proposal. Mitsubishi Chemical is an activated 

carbon supplier to motor vehicle manufacturers in Japan. At 

this meeting, I showed them an onboard control prototype system 

and gave them a copy of. the refueling controls proposal and the 

major regulatory support documents. Following this, I answered 

any questions they had concerning the proposal. 

cc: Docket A-87-11
#### § 38.10 Reporting of swaps traded on a designated contract market.

With respect to swaps traded on and/or pursuant to the rules of a designated contract market, each designated contract market must maintain and report specified swap data as provided under parts 43 and 45 of this chapter.

[77 FR 36700, June 19, 2012]
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: November 4, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Salvatore IannuzziSalvatore IannuzziChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 204.14 Transferability of guaranty; Note Register.

The Lender of any Assignee may assign, transfer or pledge the Eligible Notes to any Eligible Investor. Any such assignment, transfer or pledge shall be effective on the date that the name of the new Assignee is entered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Paying Agent pursuant to the Paying and Transfer Agency Agreement. A.I.D. shall be entitled to treat the persons in whose names the Eligible Notes are registered as the owners thereof for all purposes of this Guaranty and A.I.D. shall not be affected by notice to the contrary.
AM Y KLOBUCHA R MINNESOT A 

### MEN T O F jRWlO h OPERATION S COMMITTEES : • " ' ' \ ''•^'^DT^~'^\' \ 

# ^^''"^j^s^s^'"^ ' Bnite dState s Senat e ""^•^'^^"^' ^ COMMERCE , SCIENCE

. WASHINGTON , D C 2051 0 AN D TRANSPORTATIO N JOir n ECONOMI C COMMITTE E b i C A ii ^ 3 i JUDICIAR Y Augus t 4,201 1 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretary , U.S
. Departmen t o f Transportatio n 40 0 Sevent

h Street , S.W
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Re : S t Ctou dAirport

Gran t Applicatio n - CFD A #20.93 0 Dea r Secretary LaHood : I a mwritin g t o urg e you r

stron g consideratio n o f

th e proposal bein g submitte db y th e St
. Clou d Airport for th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Development

Progra mgran t i n di e amoun t

o f $750,000
. Th e gran t woul db e use dt o enhanc e ai r servic e in th e S t

Clou darea . S t Clou dAiipor t

woul dus e th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra mt o rehabilitat e th e ai r

servic e in th e St
. Clou darea . I n 2009 , regularl y schedule dai r servic e in S t

Clou dwa s discontinue da t

grea t disadvantag e t o are abusinesses
. Th e gran t wil l provid e th e St
. Clou dAiiport wit h th e fund s necessary t o reinstat e dir^ t ai r transportatio n service s t o th e resident s o f th e S t Clou darea . Th e Smal l Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra mgran t woul dhel p offse t

startu p costs , pa

y for marketin g efforts , an dcove r an y cost s incurre db y carrier s t o rejuvenat e th e S t Clou dare aai r

service
. I n additio n t o thes e importan t enhancements , thi s projec t wil l ensur e tha t

th e S t Clou dAirpor

t i s abl e t o provid e direct , affordabl e ai r transi t option s for

th e communitie s the y serve . A s amembe r

o f th e Committe e o n Commerce , Science , an dTransportation , I understan dtha t a stron g transportatio n infrastructure i s invaluabl e t o th e economi c growt h o f aregion , thi s proposal woul d ensur e tha t

transportatio n availabl e t o th e resident s o f th e St
. Clou dare awoul db e o f th e high ^ level an d woul dimprov e th e economi c developmen t o f th e area . Ultimately , thi s proposa l woul dhel p improv e th e quality o f lif e for citizen s throug h th e creatio n o f astronger transportatio n infrastructure
. Fo r th e reason s above , I encourag e you r stron g consideratio n o f

thi s proposal
. I f

yo u hav e an y question s o r

nee dadditional information , pleas e contac t Gi aVital i in m

y Minnesot aoffic e a t

(612 ) 727

- 522 0 o r b y emai l a t

gia_vitali@klobuchar.senate.gov
.

Sincerely , 

# ]C\dUL ^

Am:^^lobucn | Unitedatbte s Senato r
§ 228.14 Construction procurement with foreign-owned local firms. ( a ) When the estimated cost of a contract for construction is $10 million or less and only local firms will be solicited, a local corporation or partnership which is a foreign-owned (owned or controlling interest by individuals not citizens or permanent residents, or equivalent immigration status, of the United States or the cooperating/recipient country) local firm will be eligible if it is determined by USAID to be an integral part of the local economy, see paragraph (b) of this section. However, such a determination is contingent on first ascertaining that no United States construction company with the required capability is currently operating in the cooperating/recipient country or, if there is such a company, that it is not interested in bidding for the proposed contract.
( b ) A foreign-owned local firm is an integral part of the local economy provided: ( 1 ) It has done business in the cooperating/recipient country on a continuing basis for at least three years prior to the issuance date of invitations for bids or requests for proposals to be financed by USAID;
( 2 ) It has a demonstrated capability to undertake the proposed activity;
( 3 ) All, or substantially all, of its directors of local operations, senior staff and operating personnel are lawfully resident (or equivalent immigration status to live and work on a continuing basis) in the cooperating/recipient country; and
( 4 ) Most of its operating equipment and physical plant are in the cooperating/recipient country.
§ 229.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 229.225 and 229.230, and §§ 229.300 through 229.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 229.300 through .310.* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 229.300 through 229.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 229.300 through 229.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 229.300 through 229.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 229.300 through 229.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 229.300 through 229.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60274 Conference Calendar

SAVANNAH RAMSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THE CITY OF LAUREL, MS; LAUREL POLICE DEP’T, LAUREL, MS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:94-CV-168-PS

- - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Savannah Ramsey appeals from the judgment as a matter of law following the presentation of evidence to the jury in her civil rights action. Ramsey contends that her witnesses contradicted defense witnesses and that city policy caused her injury. Ramsey has failed to provide us with a transcript of the trial of her action, as it is her duty to do. Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Ramsey has failed to provide us with the transcript necessary to determine herNo. 96-60274 - 2 - contentions, her appeal is frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

REAL PROPERTY AND

IMPROVEMENTS BY MENDOCINO

COUNTY, APN 041-180-09, 051-10,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-03093 WHA

ORDER AMENDING

JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

The United States has filed an administrative motion to amend the February 2011

judgment of forfeiture in the above-captioned matter as two parcel numbers were inadvertently

omitted from the stipulated settlement agreement. No objection was filed. It is hereby ordered

that the defendant real property and improvements identified by Mendocino County APN

No. 051-180-09, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto, is FORFEITED to the United States

for disposition by the Attorney General in accordance with the law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-03093-WHA Document 110 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, HIV Clinical Research Management Support.                     

*Date:*                         January 10-11, 2005.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                     

*Place:*                         Key Bridge Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Nancy B. Saunders, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3134, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 435-3569,                         *nsaunders@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26891  Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Homchak, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Queens County, dated May 18, 1959, denying, after a hearing, his *cor am nobis*application to vacate a judgment of the same court, rendered June 25, 1937, convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to Elmira Reformatory. Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.