alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 207.01 Policy.

( a ) A.I.D. may indemnify, in whole or in part, its employees (which for the purpose of this regulation includes former employees) for any verdict, judgment or other monetary award which is rendered against any such employee, provided that the conduct giving rise to the verdict, judgment or award was taken within the scope of his or her employment with the Agency and that such indemnification is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Administrator, or his or her designee, in his or her discretion.

( b ) A.I.D. may settle or compromise a personal damage claim against its employee by the payment of available funds, at any time, provided the alleged conduct giving rise to the personal damage claim was taken within the scope of employment and that such settlement or compromise is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Administrator, or his or her designee, in his or her discretion.

( c ) Absent exceptional circumstances, as determined by the Administrator or his or her designee, A.I.D. will not entertain a request either to agree to indemnify or to settle a personal damage claim before entry of an adverse verdict, judgment or monetary award.

( d ) When an employee becomes aware that an action has been filed against the employee in his or her individual capacity as a result of conduct taken within the scope of his or her employment, the employee should immediately notify A.I.D. that such an action is pending.

( e ) The employee may, thereafter, request either: ( 1 ) Indemnification to satisfy a verdict, judgment or award entered against the employee or
( 2 ) payment to satisfy the requirements of a settlement proposal. The employee shall submit a written request, with documentation including copies of the verdict, judgment, award or settlement proposal, as appropriate, to the General Counsel. The General Counsel may also seek the views of the Department of Justice. The General Counsel shall forward the request and the General Counsel's recommendation to the Administrator for decision.

( f ) Any payment under this part either to indemnify an employee or to settle a personal damage claim shall be contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds.

(5 U.S.C. 301; 22 U.S.C. 2381(a))

[53 FR 29658, Aug. 8, 1988]
(June 6, 1960)

#### In the Matter of Iride Donohue, as Administratrix. Leo Pollack.

Motion for an order opening the disciplinary file of Leo Pollack denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of CepTor Corporation, (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarterly period ended September  30,  2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, William H. Pursley,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                       |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

November 22,2006

|  | /s/ William H.Pursley                                WilliamH. PursleyChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Medicine Bow

Sage Creek 2
1018000209

[9 Hydrologic Unit Code Boundary and Name

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

0 10 20 40 60 80 100
Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
eS
Map 2-20
Watersheds with

Management Actions
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 15

- 00093

- CV

JULIUS MATHIAS JR. , Appellant

V.

BANKSIDE VILLAGE APA RTMENTS , Appellee
Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 1056219 ).

Appellant, Julius Mathias Jr. , has neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, all the required fees. Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. After being notified that this appeal was subject to d ismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore
CONSIDERED
, ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed

.

The Court orders that the appellant, Julius Mathias Jr., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be cert ified below for observance.
Judgment rendered May 7 , 2015.
Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
### §18648. Accelerator research and development

#### (a) Program

As part of the activities authorized under section 7139 of this title, the Director shall carry out a research program—

(1) to advance accelerator science and technology relevant to the Department, other Federal agencies, and United States industry;

(2) to foster partnerships to develop, demonstrate, and enable the commercial application of accelerator technologies;

(3) to support the development of a skilled, diverse, and inclusive accelerator workforce; and

(4) to provide access to accelerator design and engineering resources.

#### (b) Accelerator research

In carrying out the program authorized under subsection (a), the Director shall support—

(1) research activities in cross-cutting accelerator technologies including superconducting magnets and accelerators, beam physics, data analytics-based accelerator controls, simulation software, new particle sources, advanced laser technology, and transformative research; and

(2) optimal operation of the Accelerator Test Facility.

#### (c) Accelerator development

In carrying out the program authorized under subsection (a), the Director shall support partnerships to foster the development, demonstration, and commercial application of accelerator technologies, including advanced superconducting wire and cable, superconducting RF cavities, and high efficiency radiofrequency power sources for accelerators.

#### (d) Research collaborations

In developing accelerator technologies under the program authorized under subsection (a), the Director shall—

(1) consider the requirements necessary to support translational research and development for medical, industrial, security, and defense applications; and

(2) leverage investments in accelerator technologies and fundamental research in particle physics by partnering with institutions of higher education, industry, and other Federal agencies to enable the commercial application of advanced accelerator technologies.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

Out of funds authorized to be appropriated for the Office of Science in a fiscal year, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the activities described in this section—

(1) $19,080,000 for fiscal year 2023;

(2) $20,224,800 for fiscal year 2024;

(3) $21,438,288 for fiscal year 2025;

(4) $22,724,585 for fiscal year 2026; and

(5) $24,088,060 for fiscal year 2027.

(Pub. L. 115–246, title III, §310, as added Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title I, §10109, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1451.)
#### David M. Berenson v. Firemans Fund Insurance Co. et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
### §2286k. Inspector General

#### (a) In general

The Inspector General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall serve as the Inspector General of the Board, in accordance with chapter 4 of title 5.

#### (b) Budget

In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Board in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, of the budget for each fiscal year, the Board shall ensure that a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for the services of an Inspector General under subsection (a).

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §322, as added Pub. L. 112–239, div. C, title XXXII, §3202(f)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2220; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. C, title XXXII, §3202, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3902; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(80), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4351.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5." for "the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)."

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "Not later than October 1, 2013, the Board shall enter into an agreement with an agency of the Federal Government to procure the services of the Inspector General of such agency for the Board, in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). Such Inspector General shall have expertise relating to the mission of the Board."
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4300 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4300

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 to provide work-study allowance for certain activities by individuals 
 receiving educational assistance by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2012

  Mr. McNerney (for himself and Mr. Runyan) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 to provide work-study allowance for certain activities by individuals 
 receiving educational assistance by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Work Study Opportunities 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE.

    Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``, during the period 
        preceding June 30, 2013,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``, during the period 
        preceding June 30, 2013,''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``During the period 
        preceding June 30, 2013, an'' and inserting ``An''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet January 21, 2005, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-committees (4) Old Business. (5) Non Attendance/Informational/action item (6) Discussion/approval of projects, (7) Matters before the group (8) hand outs (9) next agenda items and meeting date.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 21, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983-8503: e-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us.*      ( print page 75900)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by January 17, 2005. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

Dated: December 14, 2004.

Blaine Baker,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 04-27744 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Raymond Gerard, Appellant, v Supreme Company, Respondent.

[717 NYS2d 106]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered December 16, 1999, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant landlord’s motion to dismiss plaintiff tenant’s complaint seeking judgment against defendant for rent overcharges collected by a previous landlord, as determined by the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), and order, same court and Justice, entered September 2, 1999, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss another complaint by plaintiff seeking damages for defendant’s commencement of an eviction proceeding that allegedly was meritless and intended to harass, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*155The action to recover the rent overcharges collected by a prior landlord was properly dismissed in view of the documentary evidence establishing that defendant purchased the building at a judicial foreclosure sale, and in the absence of any evidence contradicting defendant’s representation that it had no notice of the rent overcharge proceeding at the time of such purchase and immediately credited plaintiff for its portion of the overcharge as soon as it learned thereof (9 NYCRR 2526.1 [f] [2]; *see generally, Matter of Gaines v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*90 NY2d 545). Nor did plaintiff establish a collusive relationship between the previous landlord and defendant such as would make the judicial sale exemption to successor liability for rent overcharges inapplicable. Plaintiffs other action, seeking damages for “prejudice, perjury, pain and suffering” allegedly caused by defendant’s commencement of a meritless holdover proceeding, was properly dismissed as barred by res judicata, DHCR having dismissed a prior harassment complaint by plaintiff that was predicated upon the same facts. In any event, as the motion court also held, the complaint fails to state a cause of action. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

GARY PAVLIC,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN F. BELL, ET AL,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 524 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 227.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Etkin, Appellant.

[714 NYS2d 841]

—Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered January 24, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of bribing a witness.

In April 1998, defendant was indicted on a single count of bribing a witness, a class D felony. He subsequently entered a plea of guilty to the indictment pursuant to a plea bargain which included a five-year sentence, with a maximum possible jail time of six months and the remainder of the five years on *600probation. As part of the plea bargain, defendant, who was represented by counsel, knowingly and voluntarily executed an unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant to three months in jail and the remainder of the five-year period on probation. Defendant appeals from the sentence.

Although defendant’s argument includes a claim that the prosecutor violated a promise to recommend only probation at sentencing, it is undisputed that the promise was conditional and one of the conditions, to which defendant knowingly and voluntarily agreed, was not satisfied. The remainder of defendant’s argument concerns the severity of the sentence, an ■, issue encompassed by defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal *(see, People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737; *People v Kwiatkowski,*263 AD2d 552, *lv denied*93 NY2d 1021). In any event, we see no abuse of discretion in County Court’s conclusion that some jail time should be imposed and we find no extraordinary circumstances which would warrant a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice.

Crew III, J. P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and matter remitted to the County Court of Schenectady County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
§ 20.6 COLA. ( a ) *Retirement benefits.* A retirement annuity payable to a former spouse under § 20.4 is adjusted for cost-of-living increases under section 826 or 858 of the Act in the same manner as the annuity of the principal. The first such increase for a former spouse shall be prorated under the applicable section in the same way the first increase for the principal is adjusted, irrespective of whether the annuity to the former spouse commences on the same date as the annuity to the principal. If the benefit of a former spouse is based in part on an annuity supplement payable to a principal under 5 U.S.C. 8421 which is not adjusted by COLA, then that portion of the benefit payable to a former spouse is not adjusted by COLA.
( b ) *Survivor benefits.* ( 1 ) Survivor annuities payable to a former spouse are adjusted for COLA under section 826 or 858 of the Act in the same manner as annuities are or would be adjusted for other survivors of the principal.
( 2 ) A survivor annuity payable to a former spouse under § 20.5-1(A) shall be increased from its commencing date pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of section 826 of the Act or 8462 of Title 5, U.S. Code, by all COLA received by the principal at death, irrespective of the date of death and in instances where death occurred prior to December 22, 1987, by all COLA that would have been paid to a survivor annuitant from the date of death until December 22, 1987.
( 3 ) The first increase to which a former spouse becomes entitled whose annuity is computed under § 20.5(a)(2) shall be prorated pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8462(c)(4).
( 4 ) The first increase to which a former spouse becomes entitled whose annuity is computed under § 20.5(a)(3) or
( 5 ) Shall be prorated pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of section 826 of the Act or 8462 or title 5, U.S. Code.
§ 18.14 Hearing examiner. ( a ) After an answer is filed, if the Director General decides to continue the administrative disciplinary proceedings, he/she shall appoint a hearing examiner to conduct those proceedings under this part.
( b ) *Authorities.* Among other powers, the hearing examiner shall have authority, in connection with any proceeding assigned or referred to him/her, to do the following: ( 1 ) Take evidence under appropriate formalities;
( 2 ) Make rulings upon motions and requests;
( 3 ) Determine the time and place of hearing and regulate its course and conduct;
( 4 ) Adopt rules of procedure and modify the same from time to time as occasion requires for the orderly disposition of proceedings;
( 5 ) Rule upon offers of proof, receive relevant evidence, and examine witnesses;
( 6 ) Take or authorize the taking of depositions;
( 7 ) Receive and consider oral or written argument on facts or law;
( 8 ) Hold or provide for the holding of conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( 9 ) Perform such acts and take such measures as are necessary or appropriate to the efficient conduct of any proceeding; and
( 10 ) Make initial decisions.