alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JULIA MEZHINSKY JAYNE (State Bar No. 202753) 

E-Mail: jjayne@campbelljayne.com

CAMPBELL & JAYNE LLP 

350 Sansome Street, Suite 650 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 623-3600 

Facsimile: (415) 623-3605 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JUAN PAULO GARCIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff 

 

JUAN PAULO D. GARCIA 

 Defendant 

 CASE NO. CR-08-0888 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER WAIVING PERSONAL 

APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto and their respective 

undersigned counsel, and with the consent of Defendant Juan Paulo Garcia that his personal 

appearance be waived for the hearing presently scheduled for June 28, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

At the hearing scheduled for June 28, 2010, it is expected that a substantive hearing or 

trial date will be set. Mr. Garcia’s counsel will personally notify Mr. Garcia of any dates set. 

Because Mr. Garcia is a resident of Michigan and his travel would be unduly burdensome 

given that the upcoming hearing will be primarily for the purpose of calendaring, the parties 

stipulate that it is appropriate to waive the defendant’s personal appearance for the status hearing 

currently scheduled for June 28, 2010. 

Case 3:08-cr-00888-MHP Document 51 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

DATED: June 24, 2010 Campbell & Jayne LLP 

By: /s/ Julia Mezhinsky Jayne 

 JULIA MEZHINSKY JAYNE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JUAN PAULO GARCIA 

DATED: June 24, 2010 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

By: /s/ Hartley West 

 HARTLEY WEST 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 

HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

6/28/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cr-00888-MHP Document 51 Filed 06/28/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-Es, Inc. (the
Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
|Name:                 |  | Mark H. McKinnies      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | November 13, 2009
#### § 1428.1 Scope.

This part sets forth procedures under which the Board, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 4107(a)(5) enforce decisions and orders of the Assistant Secretary in standards of conduct matters arising under 5 U.S.C. 7120.
#### Vincent T. Oliver, Appellant, v Carl P. Goldstein et al., Respondents.

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 5, 1977 in Sullivan County, as dismissed certain causes of action alleged in the complaint. The defendant law firm was hired on June 16, 1971 by plaintiff to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and on that date defendants were paid the sum of $500. After the foreclosure, defendants *907distributed all moneys received except the sum of $8,232.40 which they claimed was due them as the reasonable amount of their fees and disbursements. The plaintiff maintains that the sum of $500 was the agreed amount for the services to be rendered. Defendants contend it was only a down payment. The complaint alleges some seven causes of action based, among other things, on wrongful acts, fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of implied contract. From our reading of the complaint, however, we conclude, as did Special Term, that the only viable cause of action alleged is whether the sum retained by defendants is the fair and reasonable value of the legal services rendered. The order of Special Term, therefore, should be affirmed. Order affirmed, with costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., not taking part.
#### § 1103.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
#### Thomas Oseland, appellee, v. Wabash Railway Company, appellant.

Action for personal injuries received by falling into a hole at the intersection of a street with defendant’s right of way. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Christian county; the Hon. William B. Wright, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922.

Rehearing denied December 19, 1922.

Hogan & Reese, for appellant; N. S. Brown, of counsel. McBride & Vogelsang, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §300aa–28. Manufacturer recordkeeping and reporting

#### (a) General rule

Each vaccine manufacturer of a vaccine set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table or any other vaccine the administration of which is mandated by the law or regulations of any State, shall, with respect to each batch, lot, or other quantity manufactured or licensed after December 22, 1987—

(1) prepare and maintain records documenting the history of the manufacturing, processing, testing, repooling, and reworking of each batch, lot, or other quantity of such vaccine, including the identification of any significant problems encountered in the production, testing, or handling of such batch, lot, or other quantity,

(2) if a safety test on such batch, lot, or other quantity indicates a potential imminent or substantial public health hazard is presented, report to the Secretary within 24 hours of such safety test which the manufacturer (or manufacturer's representative) conducted, including the date of the test, the type of vaccine tested, the identity of the batch, lot, or other quantity tested, whether the batch, lot, or other quantity tested is the product of repooling or reworking of previous batches, lots, or other quantities (and, if so, the identity of the previous batches, lots, or other quantities which were repooled or reworked), the complete test results, and the name and address of the person responsible for conducting the test,

(3) include with each such report a certification signed by a responsible corporate official that such report is true and complete, and

(4) prepare, maintain, and upon request submit to the Secretary product distribution records for each such vaccine by batch, lot, or other quantity number.

#### (b) Sanction

Any vaccine manufacturer who intentionally destroys, alters, falsifies, or conceals any record or report required under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) shall—

(1) be subject to a civil penalty of up to $100,000 per occurrence, or

(2) be fined $50,000 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

Such penalty shall apply to the person who intentionally destroyed, altered, falsified, or concealed such record or report, to the person who directed that such record or report be destroyed, altered, falsified, or concealed, and to the vaccine manufacturer for which such person is an agent, employee, or representative. Each act of destruction, alteration, falsification, or concealment shall be treated as a separate occurrence.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXI, §2128, as added Pub. L. 99–660, title III, §311(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3777; amended Pub. L. 100–203, title IV, §4302(b)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "December 22, 1987" substituted for "the effective date of this subpart" on authority of section 323 of Pub. L. 99–660, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note under section 300aa–1 of this title.

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–203 substituted "effective date of this subpart" for "effective date of this part".
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Angelo Lapi, William Gross, Samuel Rosenthal and Selina Meyeroff, Respondents.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 23, 1977, which, after a hearing, granted defendants’ motion to controvert a search warrant and to suppress the evidence seized thereunder. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. Defendants were indicted for the crimes of promoting gambling in the first degree and possession of gambling records in the first degree. The indictment followed the search of an apartment in Brooklyn made pursuant to a search warrant signed on March 20, 1975. The defendants moved to controvert the search warrant and suppress the evidence seized thereunder on the ground that no probable cause existed for the issuance of the warrant. The Criminal Term granted defendants’ motion. We reverse. The affidavit was executed by a police officer who, together with named police officers acting as his informants, was engaged in the investigation of illegal gambling. The officer who executed the affidavit upon which the warrant was based and one of the police informants listed therein were both experts in the subject of illegal gambling and were familiar with the "structure, functioning and modus operand! of illegal gambling.” The lengthy affidavit supplied to the court prior to the issuance of the search warrant contained the observations of several police officers, including those of an expert in the field of illegal gambling, which indicated repeated and regularly timed behavior engaged in by known gamblers consistent with an illegal policy scheme. This repeated pattern of behavior observed by experienced police officers constituted more than guesswork; it amounted to probable cause *(People v Valentine, 17*NY2d 128; *People v Tuzzino, 54*AD2d 744). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion should have been denied. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SONJA M. CLEMENTS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-08-2598-LSW

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO CHANGE 

TRIAL DATE

Upon Joint Motion to Change Trial Date, and for good cause shown therein, it is 

ORDERED,

the joint motion is

GRANTED. The following dates shall replace previous dates set in this matter:

January 10, 17, 24, 31 or March 14, 2011 (or date thereafter convenient for the Court) 

Bench Trial.

Final Pretrial Conference approximately three weeks before Bench Trial(excluding 

February 14 and 21, 2011).

Dated ,__________________ 2010.

_____________________________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Case3:08-cv-02598-JSW Document51-1 Filed08/18/10 Page1 of 1

The pretrial conference is CONTINUED to March 7, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. and the trial is CONTINUED to April 4, 2010 at 8:00 am. August 24

Case 3:08-cv-02598-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
### §285h. Purpose of Institute

The general purpose of the National Institute of Dental Research is the conduct and support of research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to the cause, prevention, and methods of diagnosis and treatment of dental and oral diseases and conditions.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §453, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 856.)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL LEE CALLEGARI, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHARLES D. LEE, M.D., et al.,

Defendants. _______________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-2420 MMC (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO OPPOSE DISPOSITIVE

MOTION

(Docket Nos. 34 & 35)

On May 12, 2008, plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the abovetitled civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed a motion to

dismiss, or, alternatively, for summary judgment. 

Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to oppose

defendants’ motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the motion within

thirty days of the date this order is filed. Defendants shall file a reply within fifteen days of

the date the opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket Nos. 34 and 35.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 14, 2010

 /s/ Vaughn R. Walker for 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02420-MMC Document 37 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 1
### §18938. Sustainable chemistry research and education

In accordance with section 9303 of title 15, the Director shall carry out activities in support of sustainable chemistry, including coordinating and partnering with academia, industry, nonprofit organizations, and other entities in activities to support clean, safe, and economic alternatives, technologies, and methodologies to traditional chemical products and processes.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, §10233, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1484.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel GONZALEZ-MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40632

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 18, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gabriel Gonzalez-Medina has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez-Medina has not filed a response.

*260Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4014 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4014

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to information 
        provided to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FDIA AMENDMENTS REGARDING DISCLOSURES TO THE BUREAU OF 
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION.
    The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.) is 
amended--
        (1) in section 11(t)(2)(A) (12 U.S.C. 1821(t)(2)(A)), by 
    inserting after clause (v) the following:
                ``(vi) The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.''; 
            and
        (2) in section 18(x) (12 U.S.C. 1828(x))--
            (A) by inserting ``the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
        Protection,'' before ``any Federal banking agency'' each place 
        such term appears; and
            (B) by striking ``such agency'' each place such term 
        appears and inserting ``such Bureau, agency''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 1508.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business? Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at the next lower tier, you must require that participant to— ( a ) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the transaction. You may do so using any method(s), unless § 1508.440 requires you to use specific methods.
( b ) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next lower tier.
#### Norman M. Obedin et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Masiello et al., Appellants. Patsy W. Crispo et al., Appellants, v. Norman M. Obedin et al., Respondents.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants argue or submit the appeal at the January 1961 Term. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before December 15,1960. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### § 1423.15 Intervention.

Any person involved and desiring to intervene in any proceeding pursuant to this part shall file a motion in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 1423.22. The motion shall state the grounds upon which such person claims involvement.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph L. Ellis, Deceased. Donna Ellis et al., Respondents; Koerner, Silberberg & Weiner L. L. P., Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 53]

—Decree, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered July 29, 1999, which, in a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110, fixed respondent law firm’s compensation at $62,000 and directed it to refund $56,078.05 to petitioners’ clients, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*103Respondent failed to sustain its burden of justifying its charges for the services it performed that were legal, as opposed to executorial, in nature (see, *Matter of Hughes,*214 AD2d 353; *Matter of Warhol,*224 AD2d 235, 236, *lv denied*88 NY2d 803). While smooth administration of the estate may have been impeded by a coexecutor who was unable to agree with the other three on ordinary matters of estate administration, such was hardly an unusual situation *(cf.,*EPTL 10-10.7), and the vague entries in respondent’s invoices and time records do not demonstrate that this was the source of most of its charges. We would add that such entries also fail to show that the administrative services performed by respondent were unique or difficult or added to the estate’s value. We have considered and rejected respondent’s other arguments. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
§ 39.25 Conflicts of interest. A derivatives clearing organization shall: ( a ) Establish and enforce rules to minimize conflicts of interest in the decision-making process of the derivatives clearing organization;
( b ) Establish a process for resolving such conflicts of interest; and
( c ) Have procedures for identifying, addressing, and managing conflicts of interest involving members of the board of directors.
[85 FR 4862, Jan. 27, 2020, as amended at 88 FR 53684, Aug. 8, 2023]
Case 3:08-cv-03292-EMC Document 35 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03292-EMC Document 35 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03292-EMC Document 35 Filed 01/22/10 Page 3 of 3
#### § 1004.3 Requirement of open meetings.

Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of agency business other than in accordance with this section. Except as provided in § 1004.4 every portion of every meeting of the agency shall be open to public observation.
IB 

House Calendar No. 150 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4347 

[Report No. 112–614] 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th Street 

in Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2012 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 19, 2012 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4347 RH

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 

West 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert 

Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4347 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 709 West 

5 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States Court7 house’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

11 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

12 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States 

13 Courthouse’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 150 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4347 

[Report No. 112–614] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

‘‘Robert Boochever United States Courthouse’’. at 709 West 9th Street in Juneau, Alaska, as the 

JULY 19, 2012 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS