alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### (A) Harold Fromkin et al., Appellants, v. Merrall Realty, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Land & Building Investors, Inc., Respondent-Appellant. (B) Kendell W. Garrett, Respondent, v. Herman Bauerlein, Appellant. (C) John J. Walsh, Sr., Appellant, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent. (D) In the Matter of Paul M. Greene, Respondent, v. George Stengel et al., Constituting the Suffolk County Civil Service Commission, et al., Appellants, and Arthur M. Cromarty et al., Constituting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Suffolk, Respondents.

[In each action] Motion by appellant[s] for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.45 Termination or modification of a loan, grant or implementing document. ( a ) *Effect of termination or modification.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the availability of USAID funds to finance the procurement of commodities and commodity-related services shall terminate or shall be modified, whenever and to the same extent that the implementing document which relates to such delivery is terminated or modified by operation of provisions contained in the document, or by the exercise of rights otherwise reserved to USAID.
( 2 ) Unless the supplier and USAID agree otherwise, to the extent that the supplier has received an irrevocable letter of credit from a bank under an USAID letter of commitment, the purchase contract shall be affected only to the extent necessary to comply with any vesting order issued by USAID in accordance with § 201.44.
( b ) *Responsibilities of parties after termination or modification of USAID-financing.* Upon termination or modification of USAID-financing of commodities or commodity-related services, the supplier, importer and approved applicant shall make such arrangements as are necessary to obtain the cancellation or modification of any letter of credit in favor of the supplier.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Stakeholderreport.**
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.2:ST 1/
Item Number:0306 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001103517
 
August 1, 2019
ARTICLES OF MERGER
                                       OF
                           AAMN ACQUISITION SUB, INC.
                                      INTO
                     AFRICAN AMERICAN MEDICAL NETWORK, INC.

                 ***********************************************

      AAMN ACQUISITION SUB, INC. ("Acquisition Sub") and AFRICAN AMERICAN
MEDICAL NETWORK, INC. ("Medical Network"), acting in compliance with the
provisions of ss.607.1105, Florida Statutes, hereby certify as follows:

      1. A Merger Agreement (the "Merger Agreement") was approved by the board
of directors of each of Acquisition Sub and Medical Network and the sole
shareholders of Acquisition Sub and Medical Network on May 10, 2005. Pursuant to
the Merger Agreement, Acquisition Sub is to be merged into Medical Network, with
Medical Network as the surviving or resulting entity. The terms of the merger
are set forth in the copy of the Merger Agreement, as amended and attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

      2. The merger shall be effective as of the date of filing these Articles
of Merger with the Florida Secretary of State.

Dated:   November 16, 2005            AAMN Acquisition Sub, Inc.

                                      By: /s/  Philip M. Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                               Philip M. Cohen, President



                                      African American Medical Network, Inc.


                                      By:  /s/ Charles V. Richardson
                                          --------------------------------------
                                               Charles V. Richardson, President
§ 38.550 Core Principle 10. The board of trade shall maintain rules and procedures to provide for the recording and safe storage of all identifying trade information in a manner that enables the contract market to use the information: ( a ) To assist in the prevention of customer and market abuses; and
( b ) To provide evidence of any violations of the rules of the contract market.
HOWARD 

ROME 

MARTIN 

&

RIDLEY LLP

1775 WOODSIDE ROAD, SUITE 200 

REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94061 

TELEPHONE (650) 365-7715

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BEREHANU H. CHALLA [SBN: 179405] 

LAW OFFICES OF BEREHANU H. CHALLA 

424 Callan Avenue # 127 

San Leandro, CA 94577 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MARVIN CONLEY and minors MARLIN and 

MARVISHA CONLEY, through their guardian 

ad litem MARVIN CONLEY 

JOSEPH C. HOWARD, JR. [SBN: 050784] 

TODD H. MASTER [SBN: 185881] 

MELISSA M. HOLMES [SBN: 200961] 

HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP 

1775 Woodside Road, Suite 200 

Redwood City, CA 94061 

Telephone: (650) 365-7715 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARVIN CONLEY, MARLIN CONLEY, 

MARVISHA CONLEY, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

REDWOOD CITY; REDWOOD CITY 

POLICE DEPARTMENT;OFFICER S. 

SYSUM; MS. ROSEMARY WILLIAMS; 

MRS. RHONDA WILLIAMS COKER; and 

DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C08-2101 VRW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DEPOSIT 

MONEY INTO BLOCKED ACCOUNT 

FOR MARLIN CONLEY 

DATE: January 7, 2010 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

DEPT.: 17th FL; CrtRm 6 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the money that belongs to Marlin Conley shall be 

deposited into an interest bearing, federally insured blocked account or accounts. Each account 

shall indicate the name of the minor who owns the account. The total amount authorized for 

deposit, including accrued interest is $2,300.00. 

/// 

________________ 

[Proposed] Order to Deposit Money into Blocked Account for Marlin Conley; Case No. C08-2101 

1

Case 3:08-cv-02101-VRW Document 66 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
________________ 

[Proposed] Order to Deposit Money into Blocked Account for Marlin Conley; Case No. C08-2101 

2

HOWARD 

ROME 

MARTIN 

&

RIDLEY LLP

1775 WOODSIDE ROAD, SUITE 200 

REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94061 

TELEPHONE (650) 365-7715

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the blocked accounts belong to a minor, Marlin 

Conley, born September 22, 2003. No withdrawals of principal or interest shall be made from the 

blocked account without a written order under the case name and number, signed by a judge, and 

bearing the seal of this Court, until the minor attains the age of 18 years. When the minor attains 

the age of 18 years, the depository, without further order of this Court, is authorized and directed to 

pay by check or draft directly to the former minor, upon proper demand, all moneys including 

interest deposited under this order. The money on deposit is not subject to escheat. 

The petitioner’s attorney, if any, shall deliver a copy of this order to each depository in 

which funds are deposited under this order. The depository’s acknowledgment of receipt of the 

order and the funds shall be filed with the Court within 15 days of deposit. 

DATE: ____________________ 

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

January 7, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-02101-VRW Document 66 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,396,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,417,180
<PP&E>                                      31,530,979
<DEPRECIATION>                               (751,636)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,326,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,232
<BONDS>                                      9,651,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,556,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,326,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               868,999
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                534,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            534,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   534,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1207.10 Handling, storage, and marking. ( a ) *Marking.* The manufacturer's or private labeler's identification shall appear on the slide and shipping container. Such identification shall include the identity and address of the manufacturer or private labeler. If a private labeler's name is used, the marking shall include a code mark that will permit an identification of the manufacturer.
( b ) *Shipping, handling, and storage.* The slide shall be designed, constructed, or packaged so that reasonably foreseeable shipping, handling, and storage will not cause defects in the slide that will prevent the slide from complying with the requirements of this part 1207.
Case 3:08-cv-01749-CRB Document 10 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-01749-CRB Document 10 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           EXHIBIT 12.1

                                   SABRE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                        TO FIXED CHARGES
                                         (IN THOUSANDS)

                                                                                      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                        JUNE 30, 2000
                                                                                      ----------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>
EARNINGS:
   Earnings before taxes                                                                 $   218,387
   Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries                                           (14,907)
   Income from equity investees                                                               (9,422)
                                                                                      ----------------
   Earnings before taxes, minority interests and earnings from equity investees              194,058
   Add:  Total fixed charges (per below)                                                      18,589
         Distributed income of equity investees                                                6,402
                                                                                      ----------------
      Total earnings                                                                     $   219,049
                                                                                      ================
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expensed                                                                     $     8,537
   Estimate of interest within rental expense (1)                                             10,052
                                                                                      ----------------
      Total fixed charges                                                                $    18,589
                                                                                      ================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                             11.78
                                                                                      ================
</TABLE>

-----------------------
(1)      Fixed charges include the estimated interest component of rent expense
         (one-third of rent expense under operating leases).
#### Morris Stern, Appellant-Respondent, v. Julius Glover et al., Respondents-Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J.; Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4365 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4365

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that accounts in 
   the Thrift Savings Fund are subject to certain Federal tax levies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 8437(e)(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in 
the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``659)'' and inserting ``659),''; and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the 
        following: ``, and shall be subject to a Federal tax levy under 
        section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.''.

SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS.

    Any potential revenue gain attributable to the enactment of this 
Act, as determined by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office--
            (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury 
        of the United States; and
            (2) shall be used solely for purposes of deficit reduction.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear at 85 FR 32296, July 13, 2020.

#### § 161.12 Environmental effects abroad of major departmental actions.

Departmental officials shall analyze actions under their cognizance with due regard for the environmental effects in the global commons and areas outside the jurisdiction of any nation and in foreign jurisdictions. Such analysis shall be prepared in accordance with separate Departmental procedures (Foreign Affairs Manual, Volume 2), dated September 4, 1979 for implementing Executive Order 12114, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions” (44 FR 1957), dated January 4, 1979.
### §290bb–1a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §512, as added Oct. 19, 1984, Pub. L. 98–509, title II, §206(a), 98 Stat. 2361, and amended, which related to alcohol abuse and alcoholism demonstration projects, was renumbered section 506 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §106(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 334, and transferred to section 290aa–5 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.82 Rights of USAID against suppliers.

Without limiting the responsibility of the borrower/grantee or other parties, USAID may require an appropriate refund to it by a supplier under any transaction which violates the requirements of this part, whenever in USAID's opinion the failure of the supplier to comply with the rules and other requirements of this part has contributed to such violation. Any refund requested will include interest from the time of payment to the supplier. Interest will be charged at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 6621(b).
EXHIBIT 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-231090 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-211150 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 11, 2020 , relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of CNA Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 .
 
 /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 Chicago, Illinois
 February 11, 2020
#### Camille vanBergen, Appellant, v Long Beach Medical Center et al., Respondents.

[717 NYS2d 191]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated January 19, 2000, which, in effect, upon granting her motion for reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court dated August 3, 1999, denying her motion to compel the defendant Long Beach Medical Center to produce its employee, Eileen McGuigan, for deposition and to produce all of the records of that employee’s investigation of the plaintiff’s complaint regarding her treatment at the hospital.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof adhering to so much of the prior determination as denied that branch of the motion which was for disclosure of statements made by any party to the action and contained in the file of the investigation conducted by the defendant’s employee, Eileen McGuigan, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.

While the record does not support a finding that the defendant Pat Turner was deposed both in her capacity as an individual defendant and as a representative of the defendant Long Beach Medical Center (hereinafter the hospital), the Supreme Court correctly determined that the hospital is entitled in the first instance to designate which of its officers shall be produced for a deposition on its behalf *(see, Thomas v Good Samaritan Hosp.,*237 AD2d 429; *Lotz v Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp.,*85 AD2d 836). Thus, the plaintiff is not entitled to designate a specific person to be deposed on behalf of the hospital.

Moreover, Eileen McGuigan is immune from submitting to a deposition since her investigation of the plaintiff’s complaint regarding her treatment at the hospital was part of the hospital’s quality control review process *(see,*Education Law § 6527 [3]). Education Law § 6527 (3) is designed to encourage peer review of physicians by guaranteeing confidentiality to those persons performing the review function *(see, Swartzenberg v Trivedi,*189 AD2d 151). The statute was not intended, *375however, to extend protection to persons whose conduct is subject to review *(see, Logue v Velez,*92 NY2d 13; Public Health Law § 2805-m). Thus, to the extent that there are statements made by any party to the action which resulted from the quality control review process conducted by Eileen McGuigan, they are not immune from disclosure, and the hospital must disclose any such statements to the plaintiff. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
### §1862m. Financial disclosure

Persons temporarily employed by or at the Foundation shall be subject to the same financial disclosure requirements and related sanctions under chapter 131 of title 5 as are permanent employees of the Foundation in equivalent positions.

(Pub. L. 105–207, title II, §204, July 29, 1998, 112 Stat. 876; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(c)(44), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1998, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 131 of title 5" for "the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)".
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 434 

To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from hiring new employees to 

enforce the individual health insurance mandate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from hiring new 

employees to enforce the individual health insurance 

mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING OF NEW EMPLOYEES 

4 TO ENFORCE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSUR5 ANCE MANDATE. 

6 The Secretary of the Treasury shall not hire any em7 ployee to carry out or enforce section 5000A of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to requirement to 

9 maintain minimum essential coverage). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LUKE D. BRUGNARA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 14-00306 WHA

No. CR 08-00222 WHA

ORDER RE REFERRAL TO 

NEW MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant has submitted a one-paragraph motion requesting a referral to a different

magistrate judge than Judge Nat Cousins. Defendant argues that because Judge Cousins has

relocated to San Jose, and does not hold hearings in San Francisco as often as defendant would

like, defendant should be referred to Judge Laurel Beeler or Judge Joseph Spero.

Judicial economy requires that matters in this action continue to be referred to Judge

Cousins. Judge Cousins is familiar with defendant’s case and has held eight hearings in this

matter since June 2014. Furthermore, defendant has not cited one instance in which he was

unable to schedule a hearing in front of Judge Cousins within a reasonable time frame. An

unworkable and unfair precedent would be set if parties could change judges every time a judge

relocated to a different courthouse less than 60 miles away. Judge Cousins has assured the Court

that he will continue to have time to rule on various motions in this case.

For the reasons stated above, defendant’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00222-WHA Document 464 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 1