alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Schoo l an dMunicipa l Advisor y Servi <

Donal dOOVey , CPA . CF O IlO e Kensingto nCou nICharlotte . M l 4881 3 I(517)231-056 3 | donsovey®gmail.co m

Februar y18,201 2 " ^ <^' v• U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n - Docke t Managemen t Facilit y- ^ ro^ri; '

—P' ~ C^y U. S Departmen t o fTransportatio n ~ '^^:^~-^ ^ Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve . Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floor , Roo m W-12G14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Departmen t officer s an d personnel , I a m a residen t o fCharlott e whic h i s serve d b yCapita l Regio n Internationa l Airpor t i n Lansing , Michigan . M yne wbusines s an d numerou s othe rbusinesse s an d organization s ar e highl ydependen t o n th e Su n Countr yAirline s servic e fro m Lansin g t o Ronal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airport . Th e Lansin g are a i s th e hom e o fMichiga n Stat e University , Stat e o fMichiga n governmen t an d man y statewid e association s tha t communicat e o n a regula rbasi s wit h Washingto n D.C . Genera l Motor s Corporatio n host s a majo rpresenc e i n ou rare a a s d o severa l larg e insuranc e companie s suc h as Aut o Owner s Insuranc e Compan yan d Jackso n Nationa l Life . I a m i n suppor t o fSu n Country' s appea l t o kee p flyin g for m Lansin g t o Washington , D.C . Thi s rout e i s critica l t o th e continuin g economi cdevelopmen t effort s o fou rregion , particularl ydu e t o th e hig h concentratio n o fstatewid e an d nationall yknow n organization s describe d above . Accordin g t o airpor t officials , who m I hav e personall ymet , thi s exemptio n wil l no t adversel yaffec t safety , sinc e th e airlin e ha s provide d saf e servic e o n th e rout e sinc e las t April . Sinc e tha t time , thi s rout e ha s bee n use d b y48,00 0 passengers . I as k tha t yo u pleas e seriousl yconside rth e reques t unde rSu n Countr yslo t exemptio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-0089 , s o tha t ou reconomi cdevelopmen t effort s ma ysuccessfull ycontinu e i n th e Greate r Lansin g area . Ver ytrul yyours . Donal d Sovey , CPA , CFO
#### Rose Gans v. Lucille U. Kurtz and Others.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27518]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission: 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, February 1, 2005.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on February 1, 2005 at 7 p.m. at the 
Whitinsville Town Hall at 7 Main Street, Whitinsville, MA 01588 for the 
following reasons:

1. Approval of minutes.
2. Chairman's report.
3. Executive Director's report.
4. Financial budget.
5. Public input.

    It is anticipated that about twenty-five people will be able to 
attend the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Michael Creasey, Executive Director. John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Michael Creasey, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Michael Creasey,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. 04-27518 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH P. GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

B. CURRY,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-3906 SI (pr)

ORDER PERMITTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions, Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22,

2010) (en banc). The court will provide each party an opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not

to exceed 15 pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this

parole denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than May 10, 2010, respondent must send to petitioner a copy of the Hayward

en banc decision. 

2. No later than May 28, 2010, respondent must file and serve any supplemental brief on

the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. No later than July 2, 2010, petitioner must file and serve any supplemental brief on the

impact of Hayward on this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03906-SI Document 10 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 191.11 Applicable benefits. ( a ) Eligible persons are entitled to the benefits provided by the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. 501, *et seq.*), including the benefits provided by section 701 (50 U.S.C. App. 591) notwithstanding paragraph (c) thereof, but excluding the benefits provided by sections 104, 105, 106, 400 through 408, 501 through 512, and 514 (50 U.S.C. App. 514, 515, 516, 540 through 548, 561 through 572, and 574).
( b ) In applying such Act for purposes of this section— ( 1 ) The term “person in the military service” is deemed to include any such American hostage;
( 2 ) The term “period of military service” is deemed to include the period during which such American hostage is in a captive status;
( 3 ) References therein to the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, the Adjutant General of the Army, the Chief of Naval Personnel, and the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, or other officials of government are deemed to be references to the Secretary of State; and
( 4 ) The term “dependents” shall, to the extent permissible by law, be construed to include “Family Members” as defined in section 101 of the Hostage Relief Act.
### §300ff–31. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–345, title II, §207(1), Oct. 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 1337

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2621, as added Pub. L. 104–146, §3(c)(7), May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1356, related to coordination of planning and implementation of Federal HIV programs to facilitate the local development of a complete continuum of HIV-related services for individuals with HIV disease and those at risk of such disease and required a biennial report to Congress on coordination efforts.
### §§2763 to 2768. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–424, §25(b), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 703

Section 2763, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §150, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 688, related to Congressional statement of purpose.

Section 2764, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §151, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 688, related to establishment of programs.

Section 2765, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §152, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 689, related to requirements for financial assistance.

Section 2766, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §153, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 689, related to application of other Federal resources.

Section 2767, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §154, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 690, related to an evaluation of effectiveness of the program.

Section 2768, Pub. L. 88–452, title I, §155, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §103, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 690, related to Federal share of program costs.
Draft EIS Appendix 16 

APPENDIX 16—MOUNTAIN PLOVER STIPULATIONS 

To provide further protection and prevent listing of Mountain Plover as an endangered species, the 

following additional stipulations will apply to occupied habitat (occupied habitat is defined as areas in 

which broods and/or adults have been found in the current year or documented in at least 2 of the past 5 

years): 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

No surface occupancy in mountain plover concentration areas. 

Proposed and existing facilities will be moved 1⁄2 mile from identified concentration areas. 

Traffic speed and volume on roads traversing concentration areas at night will be reduced from 

April 10 to July 10. 

During the brood rearing period (i.e., June 1 to July 10), roads within 1⁄2 mile of concentration 

areas will have speed limits of 25 mph on resource roads and 35 mph on other local roads. 

Access roads will be realigned to avoid identified concentration areas. 

Vehicular traffic will be minimized from June 1 to July 10 on roads within 1⁄2 mile of 

concentration areas. 

Work activities will be avoided from 1⁄2 hour before sunrise to 1⁄2 hour after sunset from June 1 to 

July 10 in concentration areas. 

Either all power lines will be buried, or poles will include perch-inhibitors within 1⁄2 mile of 

identified concentration areas. 

All fences, storage tanks, and other elevated structures either will be constructed as low as 

possible and/or will incorporate perch-inhibitors into their design. 

Road-killed animals will be promptly removed from areas within 1⁄2 mile of identified 

concentration areas (federal and state laws would apply). 

Revegetation will consist of seed mixes and application rates designed to produce sparse, lowgrowing vegetation suitable for plover nesting. 

No reclamation activities or other ground-disturbing activities will be allowed from April 10 to 

July 10 unless surveys consistent with Plover Guidelines or other United States Fish and Wildlife 

Service (USFWS) approved methods find that no plovers are nesting in the area. 

Plugged and abandoned wells within 1⁄2 mile of the identified concentration areas will be 

identified by a 4-foot tall marker with a perch inhibitor on top of the marker. 

Rawlins RMP A16-1
§ 970.407 Denial of certification. ( a ) The Administrator may deny certification of an application if he finds that the requirements of this subpart have not been met. If, in the course of reviewing an application for certification, the Administrator becomes aware of the fact that one or more of the requirements for issuance or transfer under §§ 970.503 through 970.507 will not be met, he may also deny certification of the application.
( b ) When the Administrator proposes to deny certification he will send to the applicant, and publish in the Federal Register, written notice of intention to deny certification. Such notice will include: ( 1 ) The basis upon which the Administrator proposes to deny certification; and
( 2 ) If the basis for the proposed denial is a deficiency which the Administrator believes the applicant can correct: ( i ) The action believed necessary to correct the deficiency; and
( ii ) The time within which any correctable deficiency must be corrected (the period of time may not exceed 180 days except as specified by the Administrator for good cause).
( c ) The Administrator will deny certification: ( 1 ) On the 30th day after the date the notice is sent to the applicant, under paragraph (b) of this section, unless before such 30th day the applicant files with the Administrator a written request for an administrative review of the proposed denial; or
( 2 ) On the last day of the period established under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section in which the applicant must correct a deficiency, if such deficiency has not been corrected before such day and an administrative review requested pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section is not pending or in progress.
( d ) If a timely request for administrative review of the proposed denial is made by the applicant under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator will promptly begin a formal hearing in accordance with Subpart I of 15 CFR part 971. If the proposed denial is the result of a correctable deficiency, the administrative review will proceed concurrently with any attempts to correct the deficiency, unless the parties agree otherwise or the administrative law judge orders differently.
( e ) If the Administrator denies certification, he will send to the applicant written notice of the denial, including the reasons therefor.
( f ) Any final determination by the Administrator granting or denying certification is subject to judicial review as provided in Chapter 7 of Title 5, United States Code.
[46 FR 45902, Sept. 15, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 547, Jan. 6, 1989]
### §3020. Advance funding

(a) For the purpose of affording adequate notice of funding available under this chapter, appropriations under this chapter are authorized to be included in the appropriation Act for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which they are available for obligation.

(b) In order to effect a transition to the advance funding method of timing appropriation action, subsection (a) shall apply notwithstanding that its initial application will result in the enactment in the same year (whether in the same appropriation Act or otherwise) of two separate appropriations, one for the then current fiscal year and one for the succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title II, §209, formerly §210, as added Pub. L. 93–29, title II, §201(c), May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 36; renumbered §209 and amended Pub. L. 97–115, §2(e)(2), (i), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1596.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 209 of Pub. L. 89–73 was renumbered section 208 and is classified to section 3019 of this title.

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–115, §2(i), substituted "subsection (a) shall apply" for "the amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply".
#### In the Matter of Emmanuel B., an Infant. Cardinal McCloskey Services, Respondent; Linda B., Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 699]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about October 15, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of mental illness, terminated respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of mental illness within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (6) (a) is supported by clear and convincing evidence. Petitioner’s psychiatric expert established that respondent suffers from a serious and longstanding schizoaffective disorder and depression, involving, *inter alia,*disordered thought processes, lack of empathy, impaired judgment, and auditory, visual and somatic hallucinations, and requiring repeated hospitalization, rendering respondent incapable of caring for the child, and that respondent fails to appreciate the seriousness of her condition and the need for treatment, and has a history of noncompliance with her medical treatment, which, given her expressions of hostility to the psychiatric profession and deprecation of the utility of her treatment, is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George P. Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  August
13, 2012


/s/ George MorrisGeorge MorrisChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 35.38 Reconsideration of initial decision. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If service was made by mail within the United States, receipt will be presumed to be five days from the date of mailing in the absence of contrary proof.
( b ) Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Such motion shall be accompanied by a supporting brief.
( c ) Responses to such motions shall be allowed only upon request of the ALJ.
( d ) No party may file a motion for reconsideration of an initial decision that has been revised in response to a previous motion for reconsideration.
( e ) The ALJ may dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( f ) If the ALJ denies a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion, unless the initial decision is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 35.39.
( g ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision, that decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued, unless it is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 35.39.
#### Jonas J. Unger v. Harry Horowitz et al.

Motion[s] to dismiss appeal [s] granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IO GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff,

    v.

ANTELOPE MEDIA, LLC, et al.,Defendants

                                                                      /

No. C-08-4050 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

In light of the pendency of plaintiff’s “Request To Enter Default As To Defendants

Sunrise Media, Ltd., Maik Herrmann, Thorsten Palicki, And PSI Services, SA,” filed January

20, 2010, the Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED from February 5,

2010 to March 12, 2010.  A Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than March

5, 2010.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  February 3, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04050-MMC   Document 99   Filed 02/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T02:26:30-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4426 

To suspend temporarily the duty on black 820 inkjet printing ink. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on black 820 inkjet printing 

ink. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLACK 820 INKJET PRINTING INK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.40 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Black 820 inkjet printing ink) is amended by— 

7 (1) striking ‘‘0.3%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

8 (2) striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4426 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 2.1 Designation of personnel to carry firearms and exercise appropriate power of arrest.

( a ) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Security is authorized to designate certain employees of the Department of State and the Foreign Service, as well as employees of other departments and agencies detailed to and under the supervision and control of the Department of State, as Security Officers, as follows. ( 1 ) Persons so designated shall be authorized to carry firearms when engaged in the performance of the duties prescribed in section (1) of the act of June 28, 1955, 69 Stat. 188, as amended. No person shall be so designated unless he has either qualified in the use of firearms in accordance with standards established by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Security, or in accordance with standards established by the department or agency from which he is detailed.
( 2 ) Persons so designated shall also be authorized, when engaged in the performance of duties prescribed in section (1) of the act of June 28, 1955, 69 Stat. 188, as amended, to arrest without warrant and deliver into custody any person violating the provisions of section 111 or 112 of title 18, United States Code, in their presence or if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony.

( b ) When the Under Secretary of State for Management determines that it is necessary, persons designated under paragraph (a) of this section shall be authorized to provide protection to an individual who has been designated by the President to serve as Secretary of State, prior to his appointment, or to a departing Secretary of State. In providing such protection, they are authorized to exercise the authorities described in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of section. Such protection shall be for the period or periods determined necessary by the Under Secretary of State for Management, except that in the case of a departing Secretary of State, the period of protection under this paragraph shall in no event exceed 30 calendar days from the date of termination of that individual's incumbency as Secretary of State.

( c ) When the Under Secretary of State for Management determines that it is necessary, persons designated under paragraph (a) of this section shall be authorized to provide protection to a departing United States Representative to the United Nations. In providing such protection, they are authorized to exercise the authorities described in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section. Such protection shall be for the period or periods determined necessary by the Under Secretary of State for Management, except that the period of protection under this paragraph shall in no event exceed 30 calendar days from the date of termination of that individual's incumbency as United States Representative to the United Nations.

(Sec. 4, 63 Stat. 111, as amended, sec. 1, 69 Stat. 188; 22 U.S.C. 2658, 2666)

[29 FR 15571, Nov. 20, 1964, as amended at 47 FR 30480, July 14, 1982; 50 FR 14379, Apr. 12, 1985]