alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
226 A.2d 423.

#### William H. McSoley, Jr., *et al. vs.*Alice M. McSoley *et al.*

FEBRUARY 17, 1967.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin, Kelleher, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This cause is a facet of .a probate appeal originally considered by this court in *McSoley*v. *McSoley,*95 R. I. 257. There we determined the legality and scope of the appointment by a probate court of an administrator of ia decedent’s estate made after the court had denied probate of a purported will and while an appeal from such a denial was pending. We held that in those circumstances the probate court had jurisdiction to appoint a temporary administrator pendente lite or, as otherwise sometimes •called, an administrator ad colligendum. We remanded the cause to- the superior court with a direction to enter a decree in accordance with our opinion. Thereafter' the superior •court granted appellees’ motion for the entry of a decree and pursuant thereto entered a decree -which appellants by their exceptions, iduly taken, now allege is not in accord with o-ur opinion.

That decree reads as follows:

> “1. The appeal of the Appellants from the -decree of the Warren Probate Court, -said decree dated March *66824, 1-949 whereby Alice M. McSoley was appointed as Administratrix of the Estate of William H. McSoley is denied.

*William H. McSoley, Jr., Edmund Wexler,*for appellants (proponents).

*Stephen R. Walsh,*for appellees (contestants).

> *“2.*The -decree of the Warren Probate Court dated March 24, 1949 appointing the said Alice M. McSoley as Adirniná-stratrix of the aforesaid estate is hereby affirmed.

> “3. That this decree be entered in this muse in -the Honorable Superior Court in -accordance with the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court.”

In the interest of clarity and accuracy together with the high hope -that o-u-r action here may tend to expedite the termination of the long and protracted litigation which has ensued between the parties hereto- we .believe -that the decree entered by the ¡superior court should be amended so as to describe more -precisely the fiduciary capacity of Alice M. MclSoley during the period for which she is accountable for •the management of this estate. She .should be identified in the decree as the temporary administratrix pendente lite of the estate of William H. McSoley.

The appellants’ exceptions are sustained, and the cause is remanded to the superior -court for the entry of its decree in accordance with this opinion.
#### § 128.12 Rehearings.

The Administrative Law Judge may grant a rehearing or reopen a proceeding at any time for the purpose of hearing any relevant and material evidence which was not known or obtainable at the time of the original hearing. A report for rehearing or reopening must contain a summary of such evidence, and must explain the reasons why it could not have been presented at the original hearing. The Administrative Law Judge will inform the parties of any further hearing, and will conduct such hearing and submit a report and recommendations in the same manner as provided for the original proceeding (Described in § 128.10).

[61 FR 48833, Sept. 17, 1996]
#### In the Matter of Gouverneur Morris Houses. City of New York, Appellant-Respondent; Samuel Hyman et al., Respondents-Appellants; Seymour Arenson et al., Respondents.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted and the time of all of the parties who have taken appeals from the decree of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about May 21, 1959, to file the record on appeal and their appellants’ points is extended to and including February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1963 Term of this court, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
§ 270.2a-2 Effect of eliminations upon valuation of portfolio securities. During any fiscal quarter in which elimination of securities from the portfolio of an investment company occur, the securities remaining in the portfolio shall, for the purpose of sections 5 and 12 of the Act (54 Stat. 800, 808; 15 U.S.C. 80a-5, 80a-12), be so valued as to give effect to the eliminations in accordance with one of the following methods: ( a ) Specific certificate,
( b ) First in—first out,
( c ) Last in—first out, or
( d ) Average value.
For these purposes, a single method of elimination shall be used consistently with respect to all portfolio securities. In giving effect to eliminations pursuant to this section values shall be computed in accordance with section 2(a)(41)(A) of the Act (54 Stat. 790; 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(41)(A)). [38 FR 8593, Apr. 4, 1973]
§ 22.2 Requests for services in the United States. ( a ) *Requests for records.* Requests by the file subject or the individual's authorized agent for services involving U.S. passport applications and related records, including consular birth, marriage and death records and authentication of other passport file documents, as well as records of births, marriages and deaths within the former Canal Zone of Panama recorded and maintained by the Canal Zone Government from 1904 to September 30, 1979, shall be addressed to Passport Services, Correspondence Branch, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20524. Requests for consular birth records should specify whether a Consular Report of Birth (Form FS 240, or long form) or Certification of Birth (Form DS 1350, or short form) is desired. Advance remittance of the exact fee is required for each service.
( b ) *Authentication services.* Requests for Department of State authentication of documents other than passport file documents must be accompanied by remittance of the exact total fee chargeable and addressed to the Authentication Officer, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520.
[46 FR 58071, Nov. 30, 1981, as amended at 64 FR 66770, Nov. 30, 1999]
#### § 228.11 Source of commodities.

The source of all commodities financed with Federal program funds appropriated under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, shall be Code 937 (unless Code 935 or 110 are designated in the implementing instrument). Procurements of agricultural commodities, motor vehicles, and pharmaceuticals must also comply with the special procurement rules in § 228.19. Recipients and contractors are prohibited from engaging suppliers of commodities in an authorized country to import commodities from a country outside of the authorized principal geographic codes for the purposes of circumventing the requirements of this section. Any violation of the prohibition in the preceding sentence will result in the disallowance by USAID of the cost of the procurement of the subject commodity.

[86 FR 24710, May 10, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001020424
<NAME>                        CONVERGENCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.00
<CASH>                                       4,233,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    136,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,275,208
<PP&E>                                      11,733,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,517,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,874,018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        101
<COMMON>                                        11,738
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,794,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,517,552
<SALES>                                      2,042,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,042,488
<CGS>                                          980,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,038,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             645,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,561,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,774
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,240,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,240,998)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.27)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of 300 Broadway Realty Corporation. American Contracting Co., Inc.

Order of April 27, 1962 vacated and stay of March 14, 1962, reinstated. The letter of appellant’s attorney stating he was withdrawing the appeal did not itself terminate the appeal which can be discontinued only on our order. Either party may now submit an order discontinuing the appeal which order shall provide that the time fixed by the order of the Special Term appealed from to file an amended statement of lien be extended to five days from the notice of entry of such order of discontinuance. On an appeal from an order allowing an appellant an alternative of performing some further act within a given time, it is the usual practice on affirmance to extend the time; and upon discontinuance of appeal the same result would follow as a matter of course. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Patten, Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|February 21, 2020 | /s/    MARKE. PATTEN                                                                                         
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | Mark E. Patten                                                                                               
|                  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
    Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 72109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27354]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 72109]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2005-07 of November 29, 
                2004

                
Presidential Determination on Waiver of 
                Conditions on Obligation and Expenditure of Funds for 
                Planning, Design, and Construction of a Chemical 
                Weapons Destruction Facility in Russia

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 
                1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375) (the ``Act''), I 
                hereby certify that waiving the conditions described in 
                section 1305 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
                for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106-65), as amended, 
                is important to the national security interests of the 
                United States, and include herein, for submission to 
                the Congress, the statement, justification, and plan 
                described in section 1303 of the Act. This waiver shall 
                apply through the remainder of calendar year 2004 and 
                for all of calendar year 2005.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                certification, including the statement, justification, 
                and plan, to the Congress and to arrange for the 
                publication of this certification in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, November 29, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-27354
Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4354 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on 4-Propylbenzaldehyde. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2012 

Mr. MULVANEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on 4- 

Propylbenzaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-PROPYLBENZALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.37 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 4-Propylbenzaldehyde) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘4.2%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2016’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4354 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John J. Sherman, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the “registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared: 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and present in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 19, 2006 

 

 

44
### §263a–6. Fees

The Secretary may require the payment of fees for the purpose of, and in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of, administering sections 263a–1 to 263a–7 of this title. A State operating a program under section 263a–2 of this title may require the payment of fees for the purpose of, and in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of, administering its program.

(Pub. L. 102–493, §7, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 263a–1 to 263a–7 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 102–493, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3146, known as the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, which enacted sections 263a–1 to 263a–7 of this title and provisions set out as notes under sections 201 and 263a–1 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 201 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon expiration of 2 years after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 9 of Pub. L. 102–493, set out as a note under section 263a–1 of this title.
#### David Sanders, Appellant, v John DeFrancesco, Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 867]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant on the counterclaims and against him in the principal sum of $39,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the jury’s finding in favor of the defendant and against him was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
### §291j–8. Authorization of appropriations

In order to assist in the provision of adequate emergency room service in various communities of the Nation for treatment of accident victims and handling of other medical emergencies through special project grants for the construction or modernization of emergency rooms of general hospitals, there are authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 each for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, and the next two fiscal years.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §631, as added Pub. L. 91–296, title III, §301, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 351.)
#### In the Matter of the Petition of George R. Fearon, as Administrator, etc., of Orson D. Clark, Deceased, Respondent, for the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Eunice P. Clark, as Executrix, etc., of Orson D. Clark, Deceased, to Be Rendered by Oliver D. Burden, as Executor, etc., of Eunice P. Clark, Deceased, Appellant.

Decree affirmed, with costs. AH concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER RE THE TRIAL DATE

With respect to the trial date, it will be left at May 10, 2010, but it may have to trail

another large earlier trial that will likely still be underway when May 10 arrives. The actual start

date for the Schwab trial may (or may not) slip to the week of May 17. Not having the luxury to

move the start date to the following week, the Court must ask counsel and witnesses to be flexible

and adjust, being ready to go as scheduled, as well as trailing as necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01733-WHA Document 46 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 15

December 26,
2006

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

We
are aware that Monster Worldwide, Inc. has incorporated by reference in its previously filed open Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-81843,
333-63631, 333-50699, 333-18937 and 333-131899) its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, which includes our
report dated December 19, 2006 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), that report is
not considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted
that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to December 19, 2006.

/s/
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York

---