alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2688q to 2688v. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 2688q to 2688v were superseded in the general amendment of title II of Pub. L. 88–164, by Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §303, July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 309.

Section 2688q, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §263, as added Pub. L. 90–574, title III, §303(a), Oct. 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 1011, required consent for alcoholics, narcotic addicts, and persons with drug abuse and drug dependence problems to be subjects of research.

Section 2688r, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §264, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title V, §501, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 61; amended Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §1(b)(3), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1238, authorized grants for consultation services for community mental health centers, alcoholism prevention and treatment facility, etc., and set forth conditions for such grants.

Section 2688s, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §265, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title V, §502, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 62, defined "technical personnel".

Section 2688t, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §266, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title V, §503(a), Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 62; amended Pub. L. 91–616, title IV, §402, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1854; Pub. L. 92–255, title V, §502(b), Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 85, required approval of advisory council concerned with area of interest for grants for construction and staffing of centers and facilities.

Section 2688u, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §271, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title IV, §401, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 60; amended Pub. L. 93–45, title II, §207, June 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 94–63, title VII, §701(e)(8), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 353, authorized grants for construction and staffing of treatment facilities concerned with the mental health of children and set forth conditions for such grants.

Section 2688v, Pub. L. 88–164, title II, §272, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title IV, §401, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 61, authorized grants for developing specialized training programs, training personnel, and conducting surveys and field trials in services concerned with the mental health of children.
#### § 238.12 Prosecution of claims.

After payment by USAID to an Applicant hereunder, USAID shall have exclusive power to prosecute all claims related to rights to receive payments under the Eligible Notes to which it is thereby subrogated. If a Noteholder continues to have an interest in the outstanding Eligible Notes, such Noteholder and USAID shall consult with each other with respect to their respective interests in such Eligible Notes and the manner of and responsibility for prosecuting claims.
§ 1509.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata 

CYNTHIA GAYLE SMITH 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 2215-13-1 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 3, 2014 

MICHAEL KEITH SMITH, SR. 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS 

James A. Cales, Jr., Judge Designate 

 (Cynthia G. Smith, pro se, on brief). 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Cynthia G. Smith argues that (1) “[t]he final decree of divorce entered on October 21, 2013, 

as well as all of the orders entered after March 13, 2011 are void ab initio because they were entered 

in a manner that violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States 

Constitution”; and (2) “[t]he final decree of divorce entered on October 21, 2013, as well as the 

orders entered after March 13, 2011 are void ab initio because they were products of an extrinsic 

fraud on the court perpetrated by Appellee, his attorney, and the trial court itself.”1

 Upon reviewing 

the record and opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we 

summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 Appellant raises additional arguments in her opening brief, but we will not consider 

them since they were not included in her assignments of error. See Hillcrest Manor Nursing 

Home v. Underwood, 35 Va. App. 31, 39 n.4, 542 S.E.2d 785, 789 n.4 (2001) (finding “an issue 

[was] not expressly stated among the [assignments of error] . . . we, therefore, decline to consider 

[it] on appeal”). 

UNPUBLISHED 
 - 2 - 

 Appellant failed to comply with Rule 5A:8. Appellant did not file any transcripts or 

written statements of fact pursuant to Rule 5A:8. “When the appellant fails to ensure that the 

record contains transcripts or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of 

appellate issues, any assignments of error affected by such omission shall not be considered.” 

Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii). We have reviewed the record and the opening brief. We conclude that 

transcripts or written statements of facts are indispensable to a determination of the assignments 

of error. See Anderson v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 506, 508-09, 413 S.E.2d 75, 76-77 

(1992); Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99-100, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). 

 Therefore, the trial court’s ruling is summarily affirmed. Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
702185729v1 - 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LOGITECH’S APPL. 

FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT 

Case No. 08-cv-02041 MMC (JCS) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

PHILIP S. WARDEN (State Bar No. 54752) 

philip.warden@pillsburylaw.com 

50 Fremont Street 

Post Office Box 7880 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LOGITECH, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARTHUR FULFORD, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LOGITECH, INC., a California corporation, 

and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 08-cv-02041 MMC (JCS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

LOGITECH’S APPLICATION FOR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

CONTEMPT

Date:

Time: 

Dept.: 7 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

The motion of Defendant LOGITECH, INC. (“Logitech”) for an order granting 

Logitech’s Ex Parte Application for Order to Show Cause re Contempt came on regularly for 

hearing on __________, 2010. The Court having considered the papers submitted by the 

parties, the oral argument of counsel and papers on file in this case, and good cause showing, 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

April 22

before the Court

Case 3:08-cv-02041-MMC Document 146 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 2
702185729v1 - 2 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LOGITECH’S APPL. 

FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT 

Case No. 08-cv-02041 MMC (JCS) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

It is hereby ORDERED that: 

Michael A. Fitzgerald appear before this Court either telephonically or in person at 

____________ on ___________, 2010 to show cause why: 1) he should not be held in contempt 

for violating the Court’s March 5, 2010 Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action 

Settlement in this matter and b) he should not be required to pay Logitech’s fees and costs of 

$5,000 in bring its ex parte application for order to show cause re contempt.

Dated: __________, 2010. 

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States Magistrate Judge 

10:00 a.m. April 30

April 22

Case 3:08-cv-02041-MMC Document 146 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 2
Medicine Bow

SWEETWATER
CARBON | ~

62 R61IW 60

63

64

65

ROW 97, 96 5

| 8
2

All HE Oil, Gas, and Other 0 10 20 40 60 80 100
Coal Only Other Kilometers
HEE Oil,Gas Only No Federal Mineral Rights Be te __ 20
Miles

Oil,Gas,Coal Only
Map 1-3

Sub-Surface Administration

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
#### § 171.20 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the rules that the Department follows when implementing certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (PA), as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a. These rules should be read together with the statute. The rules in this subpart apply to all records in systems of records maintained by the Department that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. They describe the procedures by which individuals may request access to records about themselves, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by the Department. If any records retrieved pursuant to an access request under the PA are found to be exempt from access under that Act, they will be processed for possible disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. No fees shall be charged when an individual requests access to or amendment of his or her own PA records.
#### Jack Sasson et al. v. Joseph Esses et al.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 562.]
§ 192.2 Application for determination of eligibility. ( a ) Any person who believes that that person or other persons known to that person are either captives as defined in 5 U.S.C. 5569(a)(1), individuals who have suffered disability or death caused by hostile action which was a result of the individual's relationship with the U.S. Government, members of the family or household of such individuals as defined in § 192.3(a)(1), or a child eligible for benefits under subchapter D, may apply for benefits under this subchapter for that person, or on behalf of others entitled thereto.
( b ) The application in connection with hostile action abroad shall be in writing, shall contain all identifying and other pertinent data available to the person applying about the person or persons claimed to be eligible, and shall be addressed to the Director General of the Foreign Service, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. Applications may be filed within 60 days after the latest of: a declaration under § 192.1(a), the hostile action, or release from captivity. Later filing may be considered when in the opinion of the Secretary of State there is good cause for the late filing. Applications in connection with hostile action in domestic situations shall conform to these same requirements and be filed with the Agency Head.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 403]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5348]]

Public Law 115-403
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 51, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 National Aeronautics and Space Administration to enter into leases of 
non-excess property of the Administration. <<NOTE: Dec. 31, 2018 -  [S. 
                                  7]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: NASA Enhanced 
Use Leasing Extension Act of 2018. 51 USC 10101 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Extension 
Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LEASES OF NON-EXCESS 
                    PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE 
                    ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 20145(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2018'' and inserting ``December 31, 2019''.

    Approved December 31, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 7:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

650 TP 16-01796
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF TROY WASHINGTON, PETITIONER,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATHLEEN M. ARNOLD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M. Mohun, A.J.], entered October 4, 2016) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law and the petition is granted in part by annulling that part of the determination finding that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [i]) and as modified the determination is confirmed without costs and respondent is directed to expunge from petitioner’s institutional record all references to the violation of that inmate rule.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), seeking to annul the determination, following a tier III hearing, that he violated various inmate rules. As respondent correctly concedes, the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [i] [interference with employee]) is not supported by substantial evidence. We therefore modify the determination by granting the petition in part and annulling that part of the determination finding that petitioner violated that rule, and we direct respondent to expunge from petitioner’s institutional record all references thereto. Inasmuch as petitioner has already served the penalty and there was no recommended loss of good time, there is no need to remit the matter to respondent for reconsideration of the penalty.-2- 650 TP 16-01796

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the determination finding that he violated the remaining three inmate rules is supported by substantial evidence ( see generally People ex rel. Vega v Smith , 66 NY2d 130, 139). Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to his further contention that the Hearing Officer was biased against him because he failed to raise it in his administrative appeal, and this Court “has no discretionary power to reach [it]” ( Matter of Nelson v Coughlin , 188 AD2d 1071, 1071, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 834).

Entered: May 5, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 214.32 Calling of advisory committee meetings. ( a ) No advisory committee is to hold any meetings except at the call, or with the advance approval, of the designated A.I.D. Advisory Committee Representative.
( b ) Each advisory committee meeting is conducted in accordance with an agenda approved by the designated A.I.D. Advisory Committee Representative. ( 1 ) The agenda lists the matters to be considered at the meeting and indicates whether any portion of the meeting is to be closed to the public in accordance with subsection (c) of section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code.
( 2 ) Copies of the agenda are distributed to members of the committee prior to the date of the meeting and are included in the official records of the Advisory Committee.
[40 FR 33205, Aug. 7, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 26975, May 26, 1977]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                        |  |    
|                        |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                        |  |    
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |    
|Date: November 11, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                        |  |    
|                        |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                        |  |    
|                        |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
### §1868. Special commissions

(a) Each special commission established under section 1863(h) of this title shall be appointed by the Board and shall consist of such members as the Board considers appropriate.

(b) Special commissions may be established to study and make recommendations to the Foundation on issues relating to research and education in science and engineering.

(May 10, 1950, ch. 171, §9, 64 Stat. 152; Pub. L. 90–407, §7, July 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 364; Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §109(d), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 889.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–159 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) Each special commission established pursuant to section 1863(i) of this title shall consist of eleven members appointed by the Board, six of whom shall be eminent scientists and five of whom shall be persons other than scientists. Each special commission shall choose its own chairman and vice chairman.

"(b) It shall be the duty of each such special commission to make a comprehensive survey of research, both public and private, being carried on in its field, and to formulate and recommend to the Foundation at the earliest practicable date an over-all research program in its field."

1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–407 substituted "section 1863(i) of this title" for "section 1862(a)(7) of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Continuation of Existing Offices, Procedures, and Organization of the National Science Foundation

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–407 intended to continue in effect the existing offices, procedures, and organization of the Foundation, see section 16 of Pub. L. 90–407, set out as a note under section 1862 of this title.
§ 300.502 Claim for securities. ( a ) Where the Debtor held cash in an account for a customer, the customer has a “claim for securities” with respect to any authorized securities purchase: ( 1 ) If the Debtor has sent written confirmation to the customer that the securities in question have been purchased for or sold to the customer's account; or
( 2 ) Whether or not such a written confirmation has been sent, if the securities in question have become the subject of completed or executory contract for sale for or purchase from the account.
( b ) Where the Debtor held securities in an account for a customer, the customer has a “claim for securities”, notwithstanding the fact that the customer has ordered the securities sold for the account, unless: ( 1 ) The Debtor has sent written confirmation to the customer that the securities in question have been sold for or purchased from the customer's account; or
( 2 ) Whether or not written confirmation of the purchase has been sent, if the securities in question have become the subject of completed or executory contract for sale for or purchase form the account.
§ 1600.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven L. Ford,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Steven L. Ford
----------------------
Steven L. Ford
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates: 1940: population: estimates of labor force, employment, andunemployment in the United States, 1940 and 1930**
 
Interactive Table of Contents
Title Page, Contents, and Forward
Chapters I-IV
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/27
Item Number:0213 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104775
 
August 22, 2019