alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance 

with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA13-1233

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 6 May 2014

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. Stokes County

Nos. 12 CRS 50761-66, 50768

CHARLES JUSTIN BOOTHE

Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 8 August 2013 by 

Judge A. Moses Massey in Stokes County Superior Court. Heard in 

the Court of Appeals 7 April 2014.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General 

David L. Gore, III, for the State.

Jon W. Myers for defendant-appellant.

ELMORE, Judge.

On 10 October 2013, pursuant to a plea agreement, Charles 

Justin Boothe (defendant) pleaded guilty to six counts of 

breaking and/or entering a motor vehicle, one count of breaking 

and/or entering, one count of possession of stolen goods, one 

count of larceny of a motor vehicle, six counts of injury to 

personal property, one count of injury to real property, and one 

count of first-degree trespass. The charges were consolidated 
-2-

into two judgments and the trial court sentenced defendant to 

consecutive active terms of eleven to twenty-three months 

imprisonment and eight to nineteen months imprisonment. The 

trial court also ordered defendant to pay restitution in the 

amount of $4,500.00. Defendant gave notice of appeal in open 

court.

On appeal, defendant argues the trial court erred in 

ordering payment of a restitution amount not supported by 

competent evidence. We agree.

“[T]he amount of restitution recommended by the trial court 

must be supported by evidence adduced at trial or at 

sentencing.” State v. Wilson, 340 N.C. 720, 726, 459 S.E.2d 

192, 196 (1995) (citation omitted). In the present case, the 

prosecutor stated that the victims indicated “there’s 3,500 in 

damages that’s not covered by insurance and they had a $1,000 

deductible,” and “we’re looking at about $4,500 covering 

restitution.” However, review of the record reveals that no

evidence was presented which supports the figure offered by the 

State. This Court has held that the “[u]nsworn statements of a 

prosecutor, standing alone, cannot support an award of 

restitution.” State v. McNeil, 209 N.C. App. 654, 668, 707 
-3-

S.E.2d 674, 684 (2011) (citing State v. Buchanan, 108 N.C. App. 

338, 341-42, 423 S.E.2d 819, 821 (1992)).

Further, the State’s argument that defendant’s silence or 

lack of objection to the presentation of the restitution 

worksheet constitutes a stipulation to the restitution amount is 

without merit. See State v. Mauer, 202 N.C. App. 546, 552, 688 

S.E.2d 774, 778 (2010) (holding defendant’s silence does not 

constitute a stipulation to the amount of restitution). 

Accordingly, the restitution portion of the judgment must be 

vacated and remanded to the trial court for redetermination.

Remanded for redetermination of restitution.

Judges McGEE and DAVIS concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice publishes the Approval of the Tribal-State Compact                               ( print page 76005)                            between the Sovereign Indian Nation of the Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa and the Sovereign State of Iowa.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 20, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary-Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Compact allows for the extension of the current Compact and clarifies the regulatory scheme.                 

Dated: December 2, 2004. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 04-27710 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4392 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4392

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on subassemblies for 
     instruments or apparatus for measuring or checking electrical 
                              quantities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2012

  Mr. Honda introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on subassemblies for 
     instruments or apparatus for measuring or checking electrical 
                              quantities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBASSEMBLIES FOR INSTRUMENTS OR APPARATUS FOR MEASURING OR 
              CHECKING ELECTRICAL QUANTITIES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.88 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to subassemblies for 
instruments or apparatus for measuring or checking electrical 
quantities) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****A healthy mouth for your baby [electronicresource].**
2010|2011
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3402:M 86/2010

Item Number: 0507-0-01 (online)

CGP system Number:000862140
October 29, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
COMMUNITYCORP EDGAR FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,607,117
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         10,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2,920,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    9,590,285
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         6,353,160
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           6,372,248
<LOANS>                                        38,233,197
<ALLOWANCE>                                    731,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 61,768,325
<DEPOSITS>                                     53,754,683
<SHORT-TERM>                                   610,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            405,755
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,497,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 61,768,325
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,597,864
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              754,508
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               165,710
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3,518,082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,584,939
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,933,143
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  105,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                927,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,089,856
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,089,856
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   725,356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.55
<LOANS-NON>                                    518,869
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                887,503
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               638,688
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  19,928
<RECOVERIES>                                   8,137
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              731,897
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           731,897
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 35.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
### §285b–7b. Coordination of Federal asthma activities

#### (a) In general

The Director of 1 Institute shall, through the National Asthma Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee—

(1) identify all Federal programs that carry out asthma-related activities; and

(2) develop, in consultation with appropriate Federal agencies and professional and voluntary health organizations, a Federal plan for responding to asthma.

#### (b) Representation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development

A representative of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall be included on the National Asthma Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee for the purpose of performing the tasks described in subsection (a).

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §424B, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. A, title V, §521, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1116; amended Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §§103(b)(19), 104(b)(1)(G), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3688, 3693.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–482, §104(b)(1)(G), inserted "and" at end of par. (1), substituted a period for "; and" at end of par. (2), and struck out par. (3) which read as follows: "not later than 12 months after October 17, 2000, submit recommendations to the appropriate committees of the Congress on ways to strengthen and improve the coordination of asthma-related activities of the Federal Government."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–482, §103(b)(19), struck out heading and text of subsec. (c). Text read as follows: "For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2005."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–482 applicable only with respect to amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2007 or subsequent fiscal years, see section 109 of Pub. L. 109–482, set out as a note under section 281 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "the".
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Received 

AN ACT 

To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States 

astronauts to artifacts from the astronauts’ space missions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 4158 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ARTIFACT. 

2 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘artifact’’ means, 

3 with respect to an astronaut described in section 2(a), any 

4 expendable item utilized in missions for the Mercury, 

5 Gemini, or Apollo programs through the completion of the 

6 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project not expressly required to be re7 turned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administra8 tion at the completion of the mission and other expend9 able, disposable, or personal-use items utilized by such as10 tronaut during participation in any such program. The 

11 term includes personal logs, checklists, flight manuals, 

12 prototype and proof test articles used in training, and dis13 posable flight hardware salvaged from jettisoned lunar 

14 modules. The term does not include lunar rocks and other 

15 lunar material. 

16 SEC. 2. FULL OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—A United States astronaut who 

18 participated in any of the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo pro19 grams through the completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test 

20 Project, who received an artifact during his participation 

21 in any such program, shall have full ownership of and 

22 clear title to such artifact. 

23 (b) NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLAIM.—The Fed24 eral Government shall have no claim or right to ownership, 

25 control, or use of any artifact in possession of an astro26 naut as described in subsection (a) or any such artifact 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 4158 RDS

1 that was subsequently transferred, sold, or assigned to a 

2 third party by an astronaut described in subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.R. MCFARLANE, S.P. LOGAN, T.J. STINSON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RICARDO E. CAMACHO

NAVY DIVER SECOND CLASS (E-5), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400256

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 1 April 2014.

Military Judge: CAPT A.H. Henderson, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Explosive Ordnance Group 

ONE, San Diego, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR M.M. Correa, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: CDR Sabatino Leo, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

31 October 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental 

court-martial order will reflect that adjudged confinement in 

excess of 30 days is suspended for six months from the date the 

appellant was released from confinement and that the suspended 

bad-conduct discharge may not be “executed after final judgment” 

unless the suspension is vacated before it is remitted.

 

For the Court

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Horace R. Kelly, Appellant, v. Christian H. Hilbert, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    400,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,562
<PP&E>                                       2,359,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,281,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 11,616,300
<COMMON>                                     9,744,206
<OTHER-SE>                                 (16,459,150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,281,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.0)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Accountant


                         BAUMANN, RAYMONDO & COMPANY PA
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                              405 NORTH REO STREET
                                    SUITE 200
                              TAMPA, FLORIDA 33609




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:               Medical Media Television, Inc.
                  Form 10-QSB for period ended September 30, 2006

Gentlemen:

With respect to the subject Form 10QSB,  we acknowledge our awareness of the use
of our report  dated  November  17,  2006  related to our review of the  interim
financial information.

Very truly yours,

/s/Baumann, Raymondo & Company P A
----------------------------------
Baumann, Raymondo & Company P A
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
November 20, 2006
§ 34.11 Scope. ( a ) This subpart sets forth STATE's procedures for the collection of a Federal employee's current pay by salary offset to satisfy certain debts owed to the United States.
( b ) This subpart applies to: ( 1 ) Current employees of STATE and other agencies who owe debts to STATE;
( 2 ) Current employees of STATE who owe debts to other agencies.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to ( 1 ) Offset of a separating employee's final payments or Foreign Service annuity payments which are covered under administrative offset (See § 34.10(a)),
( 2 ) Debts or claims arising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*); the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*); the tariff laws of the United States.
( 3 ) Any adjustment to pay arising out of an employee's election of coverage or a change in coverage under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay, if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over 4 pay periods or less.
( 4 ) Any routine intra-agency adjustment of pay that is made to correct an overpayment of pay attributable to clerical or administrative errors or delays in processing pay documents, if the overpayment occurred within the 4 pay periods preceding the adjustment and, at the time of such adjustment, or as soon thereafter as practical, the individual is provided written notice of the nature and the amount of the adjustment and point of contact for contesting such adjustment.
( 5 ) Any adjustment to collect a debt amounting to $50 or less, if, at the time of such adjustment, or as soon thereafter as practical, the individual is provided written notice of the nature and the amount of the adjustment and a point of contact for contesting such adjustment.
( d ) These regulations do not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of the debt, if waiver is available under subpart D of this part or by other regulation or statute.
( e ) Nothing in these regulations precludes the compromise, suspension or termination of collection actions where appropriate under subpart D of this part or other regulations or statutes.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel Marcus, (Acting) Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joel Marcus
   ----------------
    Joel Marcus
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 23, 2004



<PAGE>





<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1


            Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation, as Amended
            ---------------------------------------------------------

Cash Compensation:
------------------

Annual Retainer for Non-Employee Directors (other than Chairman): $20,000

Annual Retainer for Non-Employee Chairman of the Board: $30,000

Annual compensation for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee: $5,000

Compensation per Board Meeting Attended In Person: $1000

Compensation per Board Meeting Attended by Telephone: $500

Reimbursement of reasonable travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection
with attendance at Board meetings.


Equity Compensation (as provided in 2004 Director Stock Option Plan, as
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
amended):
---------

Initial Grant to Non-Employee Director: 10,000 shares of Common Stock

Annual Grant to Non-Employee Directors: 3,000 shares of Common Stock