alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 72195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 6, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. SBT Bancshares, Inc., Irving, Texas, and SBT Bancshares of 
Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to become bank holding companies 
by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of State Bank of Texas, 
Irving, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 7, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-27254 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BILLY JOE STOFAN,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-14-00166-CR 

Appeal from the

109th Judicial District Court

of Crane County, Texas 

(TC# 1655) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes JJ.
§ 120.11 Order of review. ( a ) *Control.* Articles are controlled on the U.S. Munitions List (USML) because they are either: ( 1 ) Enumerated in a category; or
( 2 ) Described in a catch-all paragraph that incorporates specially designed as a control parameter. In order to classify an item on the USML, begin with a review of the general characteristics of the item. This should guide you to the appropriate category, whereupon you should attempt to match the particular characteristics and functions of the article to a specific entry within that category.
( b ) *Specially designed.* ( 1 ) If the entry includes the term specially designed, refer to § 120.41 to determine if the article qualifies for one or more of the exclusions articulated in § 120.41(b).
( 2 ) An item described in multiple entries should be categorized according to an enumerated entry rather than a specially designed catch-all paragraph.
( c ) *Integration of controlled items.* Defense articles described on the USML are controlled and remain subject to this subchapter following incorporation or integration into any item not described on the USML, unless specifically provided otherwise in this subchapter.
( d ) *Other controls.* In all cases, articles not controlled on the USML may be subject to another U.S. Government regulatory agency (see § 120.5, and Supplement No. 4 to part 774 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in title 15 of the CFR for guidance on classifying an item subject to the EAR).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75075-75076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel

[[Page 75076]]

Review of Clinical Investigator Awards (K08s).
    Date: December 17, 2004.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Judy S. Hannah, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7190, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/
435-0287.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 8, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27410 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 1006.140 How do I know if a person is excluded?

Check the *Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)* to determine whether a person is excluded. The General Services Administration (GSA) maintains the *EPLS* and makes it available, as detailed in subpart E of this part. When a Federal agency takes an action to exclude a person under the nonprocurement or procurement debarment and suspension system, the agency enters the information about the excluded person into the *EPLS.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|August 5, 2005                                                  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00695

- CV

KAMAL KADI , Appellant

V.

WILLIS GROUP, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 972077)

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF HARRIS COUNTY

, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 10th day of February, 2015 , the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

Appellant

, Kamal Kadi , has neither established

indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, all the

required fees. After being notified that this appeal was

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It

is therefore CO NSIDERED

, ADJUDGED , and ORDERED

that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court orders that the appellant

, Kamal Kadi

, pay all appellate costs.The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 10, 201 5

.

Per c uriam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief

Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

December 31 , 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
§ 1508.1020 Voluntary exclusion or voluntarily excluded. ( a ) *Voluntary exclusion* means a person's agreement to be excluded under the terms of a settlement between the person and one or more agencies. Voluntary exclusion must have governmentwide effect.
( b ) *Voluntarily excluded* means the status of a person who has agreed to a voluntary exclusion.
#### Cynthia Brownell, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[715 NYS2d 405]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J., and a jury), entered September 24, 1999, in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a slip and fall on an icy sidewalk, insofar as appealed from, apportioning fault 90% against defendant-appellant City, and awarding plaintiff damages of $709,222 before apportionment and structuring, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A reasonable view of the evidence supports a finding that defendant’s snow removal procedures at the site where plaintiff fell, including, in particular, plowing that could cause snow to accumulate near curb cuts in the sidewalk and salt spreading that could cause snow to melt and re-freeze at curb cuts, were negligent and that such negligence created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiff to fall (see, *Glick v City of New York,*139 AD2d 402; *Figueroa v Lazarus Burman Assocs.,*269 AD2d 215). Nor does the award of damages materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances. Plaintiff, in her forties, suffered a fractured tibia and fibula, underwent four surgeries and can be expected to undergo more, faces a prospect of degenerative arthritis in her ankle, which is permanently scarred and swollen, and has suffered diminished ability to perform daily activities *(cf., Dauria v City of New York,*178 AD2d 289, *lv denied*80 NY2d 751; *Cranston v Oxford Resources Corp.,*173 AD2d 757, *lv denied*78 NY2d 860). We *32have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Buckley, JJ.
§ 242.833 Cross-border exemptions. ( a ) *Exemptions for foreign trading venues for security-based swaps.* An application for an order for exemptive relief under section 36(a)(1) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78mm(a)(1)) relating to the registration status under the Act of a foreign trading venue for security-based swaps that has one or more members who are covered persons, as defined in § 242.832, with respect to security-based swaps transacted on that venue may state that the application also is submitted pursuant to this paragraph (a). In such case, the Commission will consider the submission as an application to exempt the foreign trading venue, with respect to its providing a market place for security-based swaps, from: ( 1 ) The definition of “exchange” in section 3(a)(1) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(1));
( 2 ) The definition of “security-based swap execution facility” in section 3(a)(77) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(77));
( 3 ) The definition of “broker” in section 3(a)(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)); and
( 4 ) Section 3D(a)(1) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c-4(a)(1)).
( b ) *Exemptions relating to the trade execution requirement.* ( 1 ) An application for an order for exemptive relief under section 36(a)(1) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78mm(a)(1)) relating to the application of the trade execution requirement in section 3C(h) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c-3(h)) to security-based swaps executed on a foreign trading venue, may state that the application also is submitted pursuant to this paragraph (b).
( 2 ) When considering an application under section 36 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78mm) and this paragraph (b), the Commission may consider: ( i ) The extent to which the security-based swaps traded in the foreign jurisdiction covered by the request are subject to a trade execution requirement comparable to that in section 3C(h) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c-3(h)) and the Commission's rules thereunder;
( ii ) The extent to which trading venues in the foreign jurisdiction covered by the request are subject to regulation and supervision comparable to that under the Act, including section 3D of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c-4), and the Commission's rules thereunder;
( iii ) Whether the foreign trading venue or venues where covered persons, as defined in § 242.832, intend to trade security-based swaps have received an exemption order contemplated by paragraph (a) of this section; and
( iv ) Any other factor that the Commission believes is relevant for assessing whether the exemption is in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors.
#### In the Matter of John Osuchowski, Respondent, v Patrick Corbett, as Sheriff of the County of Onondaga, et al, Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Hancock, J. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present— Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
§ 50.77 Interest rate swaps entered into by community development financial institutions. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, the term *community development financial institution* means an entity that satisfies the definition in section 103(5) of the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994, and is certified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institution Fund as meeting the requirements set forth in 12 CFR 1805.201(b).
( b ) A swap entered into by a community development financial institution shall not be subject to the clearing requirement of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act and this part if: ( 1 ) The swap is a U.S. dollar denominated interest rate swap in the fixed-to-floating class or the forward rate agreement class of swaps that would otherwise be subject to the clearing requirement under § 50.4(a);
( 2 ) The total aggregate notional value of all swaps entered into by the community development financial institution during the 365 calendar days prior to the day of execution of the swap is less than or equal to $200,000,000;
( 3 ) The swap is one of ten or fewer swap transactions that the community development financial institution enters into within a period of 365 calendar days;
( 4 ) One of the counterparties to the swap reports the swap to a swap data repository pursuant to §§ 45.3 and 45.4 of this chapter, and reports all information as provided in paragraph (b) of § 50.50 to a swap data repository; and
( 5 ) The swap is used to hedge or mitigate commercial risk as provided in paragraph (c) of § 50.50.
### §§2801 to 2807. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–750, title III, §315, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1222

Section 2801, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §212, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 520, set out the declaration of purpose for adult basic education programs.

Section 2802, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §213, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 520; Pub. L. 89–253, §19(1), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 976; Pub. L. 89–794, title IX, §901(c), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1475, provided for the making of grants to States having approved plans for adult basic education programs.

Section 2803, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §214, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 520, set out the requirements for State plans and made provision for a hearing.

Section 2804, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §215, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 521, set out the manner of allotting grant funds to the States and outlying areas.

Section 2805, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §216, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 522; Pub. L. 89–253, §18, Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 976, provided for the methods of payment of the Federal share of expenditures.

Section 2806, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §217, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 522, provided for termination of payments for noncompliance with the State plan and for hearings and judicial review.

Section 2806a, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §218, as added Pub. L. 89–253, §19(2), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 976, made provision for teacher training projects.

Section 2807, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §219, formerly §218, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 523, renumbered Pub. L. 89–253, §19(2), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 976, set out the definitions of terms.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  November 22, 2004              By: /s/ J. Nelson Happy
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Nelson Happy
                                           Vice Chairman, President &
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                           (Principal Executive Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51279

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FIDEL RODELA-MARTINEZ, also known as Julio Chavira-Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-675-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fidel RodelaMartinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

AUG -5 201~ 

HEARING DOCKET 

Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Complainant, 

v. 

GRANDE AVIATION, LLC 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2013CE190010 

Judge: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Date: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Location: Not yet assigned 

REQUEST FOR HEARING 

In accordance with 14 C.P.R.§ 13.16 and Subpart G of Part 13 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Respondent Grande Aviation, LLC by and through undersigned counsel, hereby 

files this Request for Hearing as outlined in the Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty dated July 

24, 2014 in connection with Complainant's Case No. 2013CE190010, proposing a penalty of 

$6,600. 

Dated: August 4, 2014 

Respectfully Submitted, 

KentS. Jackson 

21628 Midland Dr. 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

Phone (913) 338-1700 

Fax (913) 338-1755 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document on the following parties' 

counsel or designated representatives at the address indicated by Federal Express to the 

following addresses: 

Original and one copy: 

One Copy: 

Dated this 4th day of August, 2014 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2014 

600 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Gayle E. Townsend, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel- ACE-7 

Central Region 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT