alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3a5-3 Exemption from the definition of “dealer” for banks engaging in securities lending transactions. ( a ) A bank is exempt from the definition of the term “dealer” under section 3(a)(5) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(5)), to the extent that, as a conduit lender, it engages in or effects securities lending transactions, and any securities lending services in connection with such transactions, with or on behalf of a person the bank reasonably believes to be: ( 1 ) A qualified investor as defined in section 3(a)(54)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(54)(A)); or
( 2 ) Any employee benefit plan that owns and invests, on a discretionary basis, not less than $25,000,000 in investments.
( b ) *Securities lending transaction* means a transaction in which the owner of a security lends the security temporarily to another party pursuant to a written securities lending agreement under which the lender retains the economic interests of an owner of such securities, and has the right to terminate the transaction and to recall the loaned securities on terms agreed by the parties.
( c ) *Securities lending services* means: ( 1 ) Selecting and negotiating with a borrower and executing, or directing the execution of the loan with the borrower;
( 2 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of loaned securities;
( 3 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of collateral;
( 4 ) Providing mark-to-market, corporate action, recordkeeping or other services incidental to the administration of the securities lending transaction;
( 5 ) Investing, or directing the investment of, cash collateral; or
( 6 ) Indemnifying the lender of securities with respect to various matters.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, the term *conduit lender* means a bank that borrows or loans securities, as principal, for its own account, and contemporaneously loans or borrows the same securities, as principal, for its own account. A bank that qualifies under this definition as a conduit lender at the commencement of a transaction will continue to qualify, notwithstanding whether: ( 1 ) The lending or borrowing transaction terminates and so long as the transaction is replaced within one business day by another lending or borrowing transaction involving the same securities; and
( 2 ) Any substitutions of collateral occur.
[72 FR 56567, Oct. 3, 2007]
#### § 136.6 Contractors.

To the extent that contractors enjoy importation or tax privileges in a foreign country because of their contractual relationship to the United States Government, contracting agencies shall include provisions in their contracts that require the contractors to observe the requirements of these regulations and all policies, rules, and procedures issued by the chief of mission in that foreign country.
§ 1006.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? ( a ) Covered transactions under this part— ( 1 ) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but
( 2 ) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions (see appendix to this part).
( b ) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: ( 1 ) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under § 1006.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
( 2 ) The contract requires the consent of a(n) Inter-American Foundation official. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part.
( 3 ) The contract is for federally-required audit services.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted


pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated: November
      13, 2008
            /s/
      Carmine
    StellaCarmine
      Stella
              President
      and Chief Executive
Officer


In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated: November
      13, 2008
            /s/
      Carol RussellCarol
      Russell
              Treasurer
#### § 1006.1000 Respondent.

*Respondent* means a person against whom an agency has initiated a debarment or suspension action.
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 142.15 Discrimination prohibited.

No qualified handicapped person shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity to which the part applies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,431
<PP&E>                                         225,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,451
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,162
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,594
<SALES>                                        204,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,944
<CGS>                                          169,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (945)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
ADVANCED AERODYNAMICS & STRUCTURES, INC.
                        (A Development Stage Enterprise)

                Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings



<TABLE>
                                     For the               For the
                                Three Months Ended    Three Months Ended 
                                  March 31, 1996        March 31, 1977
                                ------------------   ------------------
<S>                              <C>                 <C>
Net loss                           $  341,000)          $ (519,000)
                                   ------------          ---------

Weighted average number
  of Class B Common Stock
   shares outstanding               2,000,000            2,000,000

Common stock equivalents
   from the issuance of
   Bridge Warrants computed
   using the treasury stock
   method                           1,400,000

Weighted average number of
   Class A Common Stock 
   shares outstanding                                    6,900,000
                                   ------------          ---------
                                    3,400,000            8,900,000 
                                   ------------          ---------

Net loss per share                      ($.10)               ($.06)
                                   ------------          ---------
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  91,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    359,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               446,653
<PP&E>                                         605,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (284,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 785,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,196,074
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,360,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   785,541
<SALES>                                        152,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,516
<CGS>                                          142,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             93,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (302,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (302,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (302,271)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4155 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the head of each Federal department and agency to treat 
    relevant military training as sufficient to satisfy training or 
            certification requirements for Federal licenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran Skills to Jobs Act''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAINING FOR ISSUANCE OF A 
              FEDERAL LICENSE.

    (a) In General.--The head of each Federal licensing authority shall 
consider and may accept, in the case of any individual applying for a 
license, any relevant training received by such individual while 
serving as a member of the armed forces, for the purpose of satisfying 
the requirements for such license.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``license'' means a license, certification, or 
        other grant of permission to engage in a particular activity;
            (2) the term ``Federal licensing authority'' means a 
        department, agency, or other entity of the Government having 
        authority to issue a license;
            (3) the term ``armed forces'' has the meaning given such 
        term by section 2101(2) of title 5, United States Code; and
            (4) the term ``Government'' means the Government of the 
        United States.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

    The head of each Federal licensing authority shall--
            (1) with respect to any license a licensing authority 
        grants or is empowered to grant as of the date of enactment of 
        this Act, prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this 
        Act not later than 180 days after such date; and
            (2) with respect to any license of a licensing authority 
        not constituted or not empowered to grant the license as of the 
        date of enactment of this Act, prescribe any regulations 
        necessary to carry out this Act not later than 180 days after 
        the date on which the agency is so constituted or empowered, as 
        the case may be.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To direct the head of each Federal department and agency to treat 
    relevant military training as sufficient to satisfy training or 
            certification requirements for Federal licenses.
```
Map 3-3

Oil and Gas Wells on Public Lands

0 200 400 600 800

Miles

0 100 200 300 400

Miles

Source: U.S. Geological Survey 1996

Note: Data are not available for North Dakota and South Dakota.

 The Alaska data set does not include information on mixed

 and dry wells.

 

3-77

BLM-Administered Lands

Oil Production

Gas Production

Mixed Production

Dry Well
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Irene Heckstall, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 3, 1976 on resentence, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and possession of weapons, as a felony, upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The facts have been considered and determined to have been established. During the direct examination of a witness called by the District Attorney, the witness testified that she had not seen the defendant in possession of a gun in the company of the complainant. The prosecutor then questioned her concerning a prior unsworn, unsigned and contradictory statement made to an investigator from the District Attorney’s office (see *People v Freeman,*9 NY2d 600, 603; see, also, CPL 60.35). In addition, during the cross-examination of the defendant, the District Attorney questioned her about two prior convictions, one more than 20 years old for assault in the third degree, and the other almost 40 years old for manslaughter in the first degree, both of which were without probative value in the case at bar (see *People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). For these reasons, we have granted defendant a new trial. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\5634\Order re March 12 hearing.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIRTRANSPORTATION ANTITRUSTLITIGATION                                                                      /

This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS                                                                      /

No. C 07-05634 CRB

MDL 1913

ORDER

The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a

determination of the applicability of the Bankruptcy Court’s injunction to these proceedings. 

The merits of those motions will therefore not be the subject of the hearing scheduled for

March 12, 2010.  Instead, the parties should be prepared to discuss the merits of Defendants’

Motion To Stay Proceedings Upon Notice of Injunction in In Re: Japan Airlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-00308-CRB   Document 10   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T03:47:09-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.16b-1 Transactions approved by a regulatory authority.

Any purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of a security shall be exempt from section 16(b) of the Act, if the transaction is effected by an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 *et seq.*) and both the purchase and sale of such security have been exempted from the provisions of section 17(a) (15 U.S.C. 80a-17(a)) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, by rule or order of the Commission.

[56 FR 7270, Feb. 21, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 30404, June 14, 1996; 76 FR 71877, Nov. 21, 2011]
News Release announcing the appointment of James Calver as President and CEO



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 

 
  
 News Release 
  
 170 Mt. Airy Road 
 Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 
  

	
	Hooper Holmes
	 Joseph Marone

	 Vice President & Acting Chief Financial Officer

	 (908) 766-5000

	
	 Investors: Jonathan Birt / John Capodanno

	 Media: Sean Leous

	 Financial Dynamics

	 212-850-5600



  
 HOOPER HOLMES
ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF NEW PRESIDENT AND 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  
 BASKING RIDGE, NJ, January 10, 2006 – Hooper Holmes, Inc. (AMEX:HH) today announced that its Board of Directors has appointed
James Calver as President and Chief Executive and a director of the Company effective January 16, 2006. 
  
 Since July 2005, Mr. Calver (38) has been engaged in private consulting. Prior to July 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Human Resources and Investor Solutions at Mellon
Financial Corporation, a publicly-held global leader in shareholder services, human resources consulting and outsourcing. Prior to Mellon Financial, Mr. Calver was Vice President of Consulting and Benchmarking at Gartner, a publicly-held global
information and business services company; served as President and Chief Executive Officer of XOSOFT, a privately-owned company specializing in data management outsourcing for large enterprise software applications; and was President, Small Business
Solutions, and Vice President of Corporate Business Development at GE Capital. Mr. Calver obtained a Masters Degree in Engineering from Oxford University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University School of Business. 
  
 Benjamin Currier, Chairman of the Board, commented, “On behalf of the Board of
Directors, I am pleased to announce the appointment of James Calver as our new President, Chief Executive Officer and board member. Mr. Calver is a seasoned executive with a broad base of experience in marketing, technology, operations and
finance. We believe he is the ideal leader to direct Hooper Holmes in our efforts to grow our businesses and to restore greater profitability to our core division.” 
  
 “I am honored that the Board of Directors has expressed their confidence in me,” said Mr. Calver. “Hooper Holmes is an
industry-leading provider of services for the insurance industry with an impressive geographic reach and an array of quality products and services. I look forward to working with the Board of Directors and management team to leverage those assets
and advance the Company’s goals of growth and expansion while providing our shareholders with greater value.” 







 Hooper Holmes provides outsourced risk assessment services to the life insurance industry through over 235 locations
nationwide and in the United Kingdom, as well as claims evaluation information services to the automobile, and workers’ compensation insurance industries. 
  

# # #
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES and 

GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

PROGRAM,

Appellants,

v.

T.H. & C.H., PATERNAL 

GRANDPARENTS OF J.R., A 

MINOR CHILD,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4198

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Marci L. Goodman, Judge.

Dennis W. Moore, Thomasina Moore, and Wendie Michelle Cooper, Sanford, for 

Appellant Guardian Ad Litem Program; Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant Department of Children and Families.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dependency court’s order placing J.R. with Appellees for 

adoption pursuant to section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2015), because we find no 
2

error in the court’s interpretation and application of the statute under the 

circumstances of this case. Additionally, for what it’s worth, we note that many of 

the policy concerns with the statute articulated by the dependency court at the 

hearing below (and echoed by Appellants in their briefs) appear to have been 

addressed by recently-approved legislation. See Fla. CS for CS for CS for SB 590, 

§ 2 (2016) (Enrolled) (substantially amending § 63.082(6), Fla. Stat.).

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.