alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 401.5 Exemption for corporate credit unions transacting limited government securities business with other credit unions. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, a corporate credit union shall be exempt from the provisions of section 15C (a), (b) and (d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-5 (a), (b), (d)) and the regulations thereunder if its government securities dealer activities are limited to the sale and subsequent repurchase and the purchase and subsequent resale, each pursuant to a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement, of government securities to other credit unions and such other activities as have been exempted by regulation under this part.
( 2 ) For the purposes of this section, “corporate credit union” means a credit union whose membership consists primarily of other credit unions and that is ( i ) a Federal credit union as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1752(1),
( ii ) an insured credit union as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1752(7), or
( iii ) a member of the National Credit Union Administration Central Liquidity Facility.
( b ) A credit union that relies on the exemption contained in paragraph (a) of this section is required to comply with: ( 1 ) The regulations of part 450 of this chapter concerning custodial holdings of government securities; and
( 2 ) Section 403.5(d) concerning certain repurchase transactions with customers.
#### § 143.1 Purpose.

This part provides procedures that the Commission will use to collect debts owed the United States arising from activities under the Commission's jurisdiction. As applicable, these procedures are based upon, and conform to, the Federal Claims Collection Act, as amended, 31 U.S.C. 3701-3720E; the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR Parts 900-905, issued by the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Justice; administrative wage garnishment regulations issued by the Department of the Treasury, 31 CFR 285.11; and other laws applicable to the collection of non-tax debts owed to the United States arising from activities under the Commission's jurisdiction. Subpart A describes procedures for collection by offset against obligations of the United States to the debtor, by compromise, and by referral to the Department of Justice for litigation. It also sets forth the Commission's policy on collecting interest on unpaid claims, the method used in calculating such interest, and the maximum inflation-adjusted civil monetary penalties that may be assessed and enforced for each violation of the Commodity Exchange Act or regulations or orders of the Commission promulgated thereunder. Subpart B describes procedures for collection by administrative garnishment of the debtor's wages.

[69 FR 52997, Aug. 31, 2004]
#### § 37.406 Trade reconstruction.

The swap execution facility shall have the ability to comprehensively and accurately reconstruct all trading on its facility. All audit-trail data and reconstructions shall be made available to the Commission in a form, manner, and time that is acceptable to the Commission.
#### General Contractors Association of New York, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 17, 1976, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Riccobono, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellant one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur— Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman and Markewich, JJ.
### §§2675, 2676. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–103, title I, §112, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 492

Section 2675, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §135, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1321, related to projects for construction, prescribing in: subsec. (a) for submission of application and its contents, subsec. (b) for approval by Secretary, subsec. (c) for a hearing prior to disapproval, and subsec. (d) for amendment of application.

A prior section 2675, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §135, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 288, provided for the submission of an application for approval by the Secretary, of projects for construction, set forth the contents of such application, provided for hearing prior to disapproval, and subjected to approval any amendment of an approved application.

Section 2676, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §136, as added Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §101(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1322; amended Pub. L. 92–157, title III, §303(b), Nov. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 464, related to withholding of payments for construction. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

A prior section 2676, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §136, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 289, authorized withholding by Secretary of payments for construction.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to appropriations under Pub. L. 94–103 for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 1975, see Pub. L. 94–103, title III, §303, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 507.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4177 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4177

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide equity between 
   regular and reserve component members of the Armed Forces in the 
  computation of disability retired pay for members wounded in action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2012

  Mr. Schilling (for himself, Mr. Altmire, and Mr. Davis of Kentucky) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide equity between 
   regular and reserve component members of the Armed Forces in the 
  computation of disability retired pay for members wounded in action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizen Soldier Equality Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. EQUITY IN COMPUTATION OF DISABILITY RETIRED PAY FOR RESERVE 
              COMPONENT MEMBERS WOUNDED IN ACTION.

    Section 1208(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However, in the case of 
such a member who is retired under this chapter, or whose name is 
placed on the temporary disability retired list under this chapter, 
because of a disability incurred after the date of the enactment of 
this sentence for which the member is awarded the Purple Heart, the 
member shall be credited, for the purposes of this chapter, with the 
number of years of service that would be counted if computing the 
member's years of service under section 12732 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4307 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4307

To prohibit the Ambassador's Fund for Cultural Preservation from making 
                    grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2012

 Mr. Lankford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Ambassador's Fund for Cultural Preservation from making 
                    grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    No funds made available to the Department of State or any 
department or agency may be used to carry out the Ambassador's Fund for 
Cultural Preservation or any other such program to provide grants for 
cultural preservation outside the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.39

[CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND ARE DENOTED BY A TRIPLE ASTERISK
(***). THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE
COMMISSION.]

                                 HELLOSOFT, INC.
                               SERVICES AGREEMENT
                                  Amendment 2.0

         This Amendment ("Amendment") to the HelloSoft Services Agreement dated
March 31st, 2004 ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of July 26, 2005 (the
"Amended Effective Date") between HelloSoft, Inc. ("HelloSoft"), a Delaware
corporation, having a principal place of business at 2099 Gateway Place, Suite
200, San Jose, California 95110, and New Visual ("New Visual"), a Cailifornia
corporation, having its place of business at 305 NE 102nd Ave, Suite 105,
Portland, OR 97220.
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed to add to the
Agreement, Exhibit B found in this Amendment.

HELLOSOFT, INC.                           NEW VISUAL

By:        Hem Hingarh                    By:        Brad Ketch
           ----------------                          -------------------------
Signature: /s/ Hem Hingarh                Signature: /s/ Brad Ketch
Title:     VP of Engineering              Title:     CEO/President
Address:   2099 Gateway Place #200        Address:   305 NE 102nd Ave, Suite 105
Address:   San Jose, CA 95110.            Address:   Portland, OR  97220



<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT A
                                    SERVICES


3.       Project Description.
         Phase II:
               1.       ***
               2.       ***
               3.       ***

         Phase III:
               1.       ***
               2.       ***
               3.       ***
4.       Compensation
                  New Visual will pay Hellosoft the following NRE fees:

         Phase II:
               1.       ***:                                      $125,000
               2.       ***:                                      $200,000
               3.       ***:                                      $120,000

         Phase III:                                               $350,000



--------
*** Confidential material redacted and filed separately with the Commission.
§ 1008.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each Inter-American Foundation award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the Inter-American Foundation official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by Inter-American Foundation officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (*e.g.*, all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the Inter-American Foundation awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the Inter-American Foundation awarding official.
### §274i–1. Solicitation of donations; prohibition on use of Federal funds

#### (a) In general

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network may collect funds to offset expenditures relating to the issuance of medals authorized under this part.

#### (b) Payment of funds

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), all funds received by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network under subsection (a) shall be promptly paid by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for purposes of purchasing medals under this part for distribution and paying the administrative costs of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of the Treasury in carrying out this part.

#### (2) Limitation

Not more than 7 percent of any funds received under subsection (a) may be used to pay administrative costs, and fundraising costs to solicit funds under subsection (a), incurred by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in carrying out this part.

#### (c) Prohibition on use of Federal funds

No Federal funds (including amounts appropriated for use by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) may be used for purposes of carrying out this part, including purchasing medals under this part or paying the administrative costs of the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Secretary of the Treasury in carrying out this part.

(Pub. L. 110–413, §3, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4339.)
EXHIBIT 10.1

               LOAN AGREEMENTS BETWEEN AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA,
             XUCHANG BRANCH AND HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD SHARE CO., LTD.

             The Agricultural Bank of China provided eight (8) loans in the
aggregate amount of RMB 28,700,000.00 to Henan Zhongpin Food Share Co., Ltd.
(the "Borrower") to be used by the Borrower as its working capital, with
interest rates ranging from 3% to 8.7048% per annum and a term of one year from
the date of the agreements. The loan agreements were entered into between
November 9, 2004 and September 30, 2005, and all the loans that have matured
under the original terms have been extended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 

          - [CBP Decision 04-41] 

# ACTION:

Notice of application for recordation of trade name. 

# SUMMARY:

Application has been filed pursuant to § 133.12, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for recordation under section 42 of the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name “PRECISION INSTRUMENT MANIFOLDS,” used by DYNAMIC Controls & Sensors, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, located at P.O. Box 5009 Kingwood, Texas 77325. 

The application states that the trade name is used in connection with valves. 

                        Before final action is taken on the application, consideration will be given to any relevant data, views, or                               ( print page 75079)                            arguments submitted in writing by any person in opposition to the recordation of this trade name. Notice of the action taken on the application for recordation of this trade name will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before February 14, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be addressed to U.S. Customs and Border Protections, Attention: Office of Regulations and Rulings, Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Delois P. Johnson, Paralegal, Intellectual Property Rights Branch, at (202) 572-8703. 

Dated: December 9, 2004. 

George Frederick McCray, 

Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch. 

[FR Doc. 04-27419 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
### §2757. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–575, title I, §131(a), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1028

Section, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §442, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1251, authorized appropriations for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1966, 1967, and 1968, to carry out the provisions of part C of title I of Pub. L. 88–452, which was classified to this part.

In addition to repealing this section, section 131 of Pub. L. 90–575 redesignated part C of title I of Pub. L. 88–452 as part C of title IV of Pub. L. 89–329 and renumbered the sections within that part. As a result, a new section 442 of Pub. L. 89–329 was created at the same time this section 442 was repealed. The new part C of title IV of Pub. L. 89–329 has been editorially transferred in the Code from this part to part C (§1087–51 et seq.) of subchapter IV of chapter 28 of Title 20, Education, and the new section 442 is classified to section 1087–52 of Title 20.
No: 15-068 October 27, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Accelerates Schedule for Earthquake Risk Analysis at U.S. Reactors

The NRC, after reviewing updated earthquake hazard information from all U.S. nuclear power 

plants, has concluded the plants can, where appropriate, complete in-depth analyses of their updated 

earthquake risk earlier than originally planned. In other cases, the NRC has concluded reactors no 

longer need to submit an in-depth analysis.

The NRC’s comprehensive response to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident included a 

request for all U.S. plants to re-analyze their earthquake hazards. The agency has reviewed the

submittals, beginning with Central and Eastern U.S. plants in 2014, and then the Western U.S. plants

earlier this year. The agency also considered insights from earlier probabilistic risk assessments related 

to seismic hazards. In addition, the agency reviewed the plants’ evaluations on whether any interim 

measures are called for while they complete an in-depth risk analysis. The NRC continues to conclude 

U.S. reactors are safe to continue operating while they do more analysis where appropriate. 

“Our substantial reviews have shown that fewer reactors than we first thought actually need the 

in-depth analysis,” said Bill Dean, director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “This 

outcome means both the NRC and industry can better focus their seismic expertise to work on the 

plants most in need of additional analysis. We now expect the first in-depth risk analysis to be 

completed three months ahead of the original schedule, and the last ones potentially a year ahead of 

their original deadline.”

The NRC has concluded the plants have appropriately reviewed their existing seismic 

protection. It is also worth noting that many U.S. reactors already comply with the NRC’s March 2012 

Orders for additional safety equipment and enhanced spent fuel pool monitoring. 

The updated submittal schedule covers the following plants:

Vogtle 3/31/17

Indian Point Unit 2 6/30/17

Watts Bar 6/30/17

Beaver Valley 9/30/17

Diablo Canyon 9/30/17

Callaway 12/31/17

Pilgrim 12/31/17

North Anna 3/31/18

Peach Bottom 3/31/18

D.C. Cook 6/30/18
Page | 2

Indian Point Unit 3 6/30/18

Summer 9/30/18

Oconee 12/31/18

Columbia 3/31/19

Robinson 3/31/19

Dresden 6/30/19

Catawba 9/30/19

Palisades 9/30/19

Browns Ferry 12/31/19

McGuire 12/31/19

Sequoyah 12/31/19

The NRC’s letter regarding the submission schedule revision is available on the agency’s 

website. The NRC’s blog has several entries on the seismic re-evaluation process.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carol Russell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August  13, 2007                                   /s/ Carol Russell
                                                          ----------------------
                                                          Carol Russell
                                                          Treasurer