alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§259 to 261a. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIV, §3405(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1221, as amended by Pub. L. 114–198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710

Section 259, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §343, 58 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §2(a)(2)(A), (3), (4), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240; Pub. L. 92–293, §3, May 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 136; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §232(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2031, related to convict addicts or other persons with drug abuse or drug dependence problems.

Section 260, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §344, 58 Stat. 701; June 25, 1948, ch. 654, §5, 62 Stat. 1018; July 24, 1956, ch. 676, title III, §302(b), 70 Stat. 622; Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §2(a)(2)(A), (3), (4), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240, related to addicts and persons with drug abuse or drug dependence problems.

Section 260a, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §345, as added May 8, 1954, ch. 195, §2, 68 Stat. 79; amended July 24, 1956, ch. 676, title III, §302(c), 70 Stat. 622; Pub. L. 91–358, title I, §155(c)(32), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 572, related to admission of addicts committed from District of Columbia.

Section 261, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §346, formerly §345, 58 Stat. 701; renumbered §346, May 8, 1954, ch. 195, §2, 68 Stat. 79; amended Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §2(a)(2)(A), (5), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240, related to penalties for introducing prohibited articles and substances into hospitals and escaping from, or aiding and abetting escape from hospitals.

Section 261a, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §347, as added May 8, 1954, ch. 195, §4, 68 Stat. 80; amended Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §2(a)(4), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240, related to release of patients and determination by Surgeon General.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710, provided that the amendment made by section 110(b) (amending directory language of section 3405(a) of Pub. L. 106–310, which repealed sections 259 to 261a of this title) is effective as if included in the enactment of Pub. L. 106–310.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.12f-4 Exemption of securities admitted to unlisted trading privileges from sections 13, 14 and 16. ( a ) Any security for which unlisted trading privileges on any national securities exchange have been continued or extended pursuant to section 12(f) of the Act shall be exempt from section 13 of the Act unless ( 1 ) such security or another security of the same issuer is listed and registered on a national securities exchange or registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act, or
( 2 ) such issuer would be required to file information, documents and reports pursuant to section 15(d) of the Act but for the fact that securities of the issuer are deemed to be “registered on a national securities exchange” within the meaning of section 12(f)(6) of the Act.
( b ) Any security for which unlisted trading privileges on any national securities exchange have been continued or extended pursuant to section 12(f) of the Act shall be exempt from section 14 of the Act unless such security is also listed and registered on a national securities exchange or registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act.
( c ) ( 1 ) Any equity security for which unlisted trading privileges on any national securities exchange have been continued or extended pursuant to section 12(f) of the Act shall be exempt from section 16 of the act unless such security or another equity security of the same issuer is listed and registered on a national securities exchange or registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act.
( 2 ) Any equity security for which unlisted trading privileges on any national securities exchange have been continued or extended pursuant to section 12(f) of the Act and which is not listed and registered on any other such exchange or registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act shall be exempt from section 16 of the Act insofar as that section would otherwise apply to any person who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of such security, unless another equity security of the issuer of such unlisted security is so listed or registered and such beneficial owner is a director or officer of such issuer or directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of any such listed security.
( d ) Any reference in this section to a security registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act shall include, and any reference to a security not so registered shall exclude, any security as to which a registration statement pursuant to such section is at the time required to be effective.
(Sec. 3, 78 Stat. 565, 15 U.S.C. 78 *l*)
[30 FR 482, Jan. 14, 1965]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX JACKSON,

Petitioner,

    v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent.                                                                      /

No. C 08-0923 MMC

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’SREQUEST FOR NUNC PRO TUNCEXTENSION OF TIME TO FILESUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Before the Court is respondent’s Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Extension of Time, 

filed August 5, 2010, by which respondent seeks leave to file a supplemental brief

regarding the significance of Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010), with

respect to the instant action.  As respondent concedes, the supplemental brief is not timely

under the Court’s June 16, 2010 Order.  Although respondent’s counsel seeks to explain

such delay by stating that she “did not receive a copy” and “only became aware of the

Order . . . when [she] received Petitioner’s responding brief” (see Declaration ¶ 4), the

Court notes that all parties were served with said order by electronic filing on June 16,

2010.  Nevertheless, because the Court remains interested in hearing from both parties,

the Court will allow the late filing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  August 24, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00923-MMC   Document 16   Filed 08/24/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-10T19:23:00-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4158 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4158

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States astronauts 
           to artifacts from the astronauts' space missions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ARTIFACT.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``artifact'' means, with respect 
to an astronaut described in section 2(a), any expendable item utilized 
in missions for the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs through the 
completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project not expressly required to 
be returned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration at the 
completion of the mission and other expendable, disposable, or 
personal-use items utilized by such astronaut during participation in 
any such program. The term includes personal logs, checklists, flight 
manuals, prototype and proof test articles used in training, and 
disposable flight hardware salvaged from jettisoned lunar modules. The 
term does not include lunar rocks and other lunar material.

SEC. 2. FULL OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS.

    (a) In General.--A United States astronaut who participated in any 
of the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs through the completion of 
the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, who received an artifact during his 
participation in any such program, shall have full ownership of and 
clear title to such artifact.
    (b) No Federal Government Claim.--The Federal Government shall have 
no claim or right to ownership, control, or use of any artifact in 
possession of an astronaut as described in subsection (a) or any such 
artifact that was subsequently transferred, sold, or assigned to a 
third party by an astronaut described in subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4158

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States astronauts 
           to artifacts from the astronauts' space missions.
```
§ 37.1200 Core Principle 12—Conflicts of interest. The swap execution facility shall: ( a ) Establish and enforce rules to minimize conflicts of interest in its decision-making process; and
( b ) Establish a process for resolving the conflicts of interest.
§ 205.5 Responsibilities of a subordinate attorney. ( a ) An attorney who appears and practices before the Commission in the representation of an issuer on a matter under the supervision or direction of another attorney (other than under the direct supervision or direction of the issuer's chief legal officer (or the equivalent thereof)) is a subordinate attorney.
( b ) A subordinate attorney shall comply with this part notwithstanding that the subordinate attorney acted at the direction of or under the supervision of another person.
( c ) A subordinate attorney complies with § 205.3 if the subordinate attorney reports to his or her supervising attorney under § 205.3(b) evidence of a material violation of which the subordinate attorney has become aware in appearing and practicing before the Commission.
( d ) A subordinate attorney may take the steps permitted or required by § 205.3(b) or (c) if the subordinate attorney reasonably believes that a supervisory attorney to whom he or she has reported evidence of a material violation under § 205.3(b) has failed to comply with § 205.3.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 10, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. American Central Bancorporation, Inc., Springfield, Illinois; to 
merge with American Central Financial Group, Inc., Springfield, 
Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers State Bank of Fulton 
County, Lewistown, Illinois, and The Bank, Charleston, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 9, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-27476 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Frances Odrzywolski, Respondent, v. Edward Odrzywolski, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed unless printed records and briefs are filed and served on or before June 15,1960.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Docket 34-2004] 

The rebuttal comment period for the application to establish a general-purpose foreign-trade zone in Conroe (Montgomery County), Texas, submitted by the City of Conroe, Texas (69 FR 51060, 8/17/04), is being extended to December 20, 2004, at the request of the applicant. 

Dated: December 6, 2004. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-27378 Filed 12-13-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        1,960,733
<SECURITIES>                                  496,220
<RECEIVABLES>                                 152,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                   167,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,794,844
<PP&E>                                        564,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                (391,108)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,751,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         310,284
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      13,107
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,247,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,571,089
<SALES>                                       294,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              294,363
<CGS>                                         288,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 748,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (48,386)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            38,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (444,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (444,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.05)



</TABLE>
#### Grand Union Co., Appellant, v. 4944 Restaurant Corp., Respondent.

—Order entered on December 7, 1961 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE

Appellate case name: In the Interest of S.L., S.E.L., A.S.L., and Z.E.N.L.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00100-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-18283 

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing:

 Final Decree for Termination, signed on November 17, 2011 in Cause No. 2011-18283 

(Transferred from 2011-0055J/315th Court) (Image No. 50631041).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 7 days 

of the date of this notice.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon 

issuance of this Court’s judgment.

Clerk’s Signature: 

Clerk of the Court

Date: March 3, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 49
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

§ 49.31 Delegation of authority to the Directors of the Division of Market Oversight and Division of Data relating to certain part 49 matters. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates, until such time as the Commission orders otherwise, the following functions to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight and to such members of the Commission staff acting under their direction as they may designate: ( 1 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.5.
( 2 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.12.
( 3 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.13.
( 4 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.16.
( 5 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.17.
( 6 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.18.
( 7 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.22.
( 8 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.23.
( 9 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.24
( 10 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.25.
( 11 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.29.
( 12 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.30.
( b ) The Commission hereby delegates, until such time as the Commission orders otherwise, the following functions to the Director of the Division of Data and to such members of the Commission staff acting under their direction as they may designate: ( 1 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.9.
( 2 ) All functions reserved to the Commission in § 49.10.
( c ) The Director of the Division of Market Oversight, and, separately, the Director of the Division of Data may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated under this section.
( d ) Nothing in this section may prohibit the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
[89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4316 

To amend chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 to include Guam, 

the Virgin Islands of the United States, American Samoa, and the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the definition of 

State for the purposes of the trade adjustment assistance for workers 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN (for herself, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Ms. BORDALLO, and 

Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 

to include Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, 

American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the definition of State for the 

purposes of the trade adjustment assistance for workers 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4316 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR 

2 WORKERS TO TERRITORIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 247(7) of the Trade Act 

4 of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2319(7)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘, Guam, the Virgin Islands of 

6 the United States, American Samoa, the Common7 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after 

8 ‘‘District of Columbia’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘such Commonwealth.’’ and in10 serting ‘‘such territories.’’ 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall be effective with respect to petitions filed 

13 under section 221 of such Act (19 U.S.C. 2271) on or 

14 after October 1, 2012. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

QUEZADA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RESPONSIBLE ROOFING, et al.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-0821 EMC

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR

PLAINTIFFS FEDERICO QUEZADA

AND ANTONIO QUEZADA TO

ATTEND THE MEDIATION

TELEPHONICALLY

Date: April 19, 2010

Mediator: Suzanne Nusbaum

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for plaintiffs Federico Quezada and Antonio

Quezada to be excused from personally attending the April 19, 2010 mediation session before Jean

Gaskill is GRANTED. Both Messrs. Quezada shall be available to participate by telephone at all

times in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(f).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ counsel Adam Wang shall obtain appropriate

written authorization to execute settlement documentation on behalf of Federico Quezada and/or

Antonio Quezada in the event the matter is resolved at the mediation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 15, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00821-EMC Document 73 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 1
----

|  | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ James T. Olsen            |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | James T. Olsen                |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----