alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Alison L. May, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2005 of RedEnvelope, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]; andc. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:August 17, 2005*By: /s/ ALISON L. MAY*
#### § 214.37 Public access to committee records.

Records maintained in accordance with § 214.36 are subject to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 *et seq.* and, thus, are available for public inspection and copying pursuant to A.I.D. Regulation 12—Public Information (22 CFR part 212), subject to the general oversight of the A.I.D. Advisory Committee Management Officer.

(Sec. 621, Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2381); sec. 8(a) Federal Advisory Committee Pub. L. 92-463; E.O. 11686)

[40 FR 54778, Nov. 26, 1975]
#### Franklin Discount Company, Appellant, v. Charles Foder et al., Respondents.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to appeal to this court from order of the Appellate Term, denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Case 3:08-cv-00255-CRB   Document 8   Filed 04/08/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:08-cv-00255-CRB   Document 8   Filed 04/08/10   Page 2 of 2
EX-10.2



 







	10.2	 	Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement of William A, Geers





Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement




          This AMENDMENT NO. 2 is entered into as of this 27th day of January, 2006 by and among
LanVision Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), LanVision, Inc., an Ohio corporation
(“Company”) and William A. Geers (“Employee”).




          WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of February 1,
2004 (“Employment Agreement”), as previously amended whereby Parent and the Company agreed to
employ the Employee, and the Employee agreed to serve, as Vice President of Product Development;
and




          WHEREAS, Parent, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth herein;




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the parties hereby
acknowledge, the parties agree as follows:





          1. Compensation. In consideration of the Employee’s responsibilities and roles,
Parent and the Company agree to pay Employee effective February 1, 2006, Employee’s salary for the
period commencing on such date through January 31, 2007 shall be One Hundred Ninety-nine Thousand
five-hundred Dollars ($199,500).




          2. Continuing Agreement. Except for the changes set forth in this Amendment No. 2
the Employment Agreement, as amended, remains in full force and effect without modification.




          3. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 2 may be signed in counterparts by Parent, the
Company and Employee.




          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
No. 2 as of the date set forth
above.




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LanVision Systems, Inc.  
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Paul W. Bridge, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Paul W. Bridge, Jr.
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LanVision, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Paul W. Bridge, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Paul W. Bridge, Jr.
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Employee
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ William A Geers
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	William A. Geers
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 97-30191

____________

SEAGULL ENERGY CORP; SEAGULL MID-SOUTH, INC,

Plaintiffs - Counter Defendants - Appellees,

versus

JOSEPH T. SEPULVADO,

Defendant - Counter Claimant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

November 10, 1997

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
#### In the Matter of Peter David Broitman, an Attorney, Resignor.

[820 NYS2d 909]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83 [1998]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ. (Filed Aug. 29, 2006.)
§ 303.29 Labeling of pairs or products containing two or more units. ( a ) Where a textile fiber product consists of two or more parts, units, or items of different fiber content, a separate label containing the required information shall be affixed to each of such parts, units or items showing the required information as to such part, unit, or item: *Provided,* That where such parts, units, or items are marketed or handled as a single product or ensemble and are sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer as a single product or ensemble, the required information may be set out on a single label in such a manner as to separately show the fiber composition of each part, unit, or item.
( b ) Where garments, wearing apparel, or other textile fiber products are marketed or handled in pairs or ensembles of the same fiber content, only one unit of the pair or ensemble need be labeled with the required information when sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 25 FR 4318, May 14, 1960]
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:14 PM
To: Wayland, Robertj Subject: biomass question

Hi Bob,

How different is the IPM base case for the rule from v.5.13 (the documentation of which is online)?

Also, for biomass, see below: In looking at the EPA IPM documentation online at http://www.epa.gov/powersectormodeling/BaseCasev513.html#documentation – where they discuss emissions factors they give biomass a ze ro --- unlike their current model which purports to use V.5.13:
#### § 19.12 Employment in a Government agency.

An annuitant who is reemployed by a Federal Government agency may not receive a combination of salary and annuity which exceeds his/her Foreign Service salary at the time of retirement. Refer to § 19.9-4.
### §242r. Improvement and publication of data on food-related allergic responses

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, shall improve (including by educating physicians and other health care providers) the collection of, and publish as it becomes available, national data on—

(1) the prevalence of food allergies;

(2) the incidence of clinically significant or serious adverse events related to food allergies; and

(3) the use of different modes of treatment for and prevention of allergic responses to foods.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary.

(Pub. L. 108–282, title II, §207, Aug. 2, 2004, 118 Stat. 910.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
### §285o. Purpose of Institute

#### (a) In general

The general purpose of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (hereafter in this subpart referred to as the "Institute") is the conduct and support of biomedical and behavioral research, health services research, research training, and health information dissemination with respect to the prevention of drug abuse and the treatment of drug abusers.

#### (b) Research program

The research program established under this subpart shall encompass the social, behavioral, and biomedical etiology, mental and physical health consequences, and social and economic consequences of drug abuse. In carrying out the program, the Director of the Institute shall give special consideration to projects relating to drug abuse among women (particularly with respect to pregnant women).

#### (c) Collaboration

The Director of the Institute shall collaborate with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration in focusing the services research activities of the Institute and in disseminating the results of such research to health professionals and the general public.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §464L, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §123(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 360; amended Pub. L. 102–352, §2(a)(3), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §103(b)(33), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–482 struck out subsec. (d) which related to authorization of appropriations and allocation for health services research.

1992—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 102–352 inserted "other than section 285o–4 of this title," after "this subpart,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–482 applicable only with respect to amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2007 or subsequent fiscal years, see section 109 of Pub. L. 109–482, set out as a note under section 281 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–352 effective immediately upon effectuation of amendment made by Pub. L. 102–321, see section 3(1) of Pub. L. 102–352, set out as a note under section 285n of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1992, with provision for programs providing financial assistance, see section 801(c), (d) of Pub. L. 102–321, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 236 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 434 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 434

 To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from hiring new employees to 
            enforce the individual health insurance mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2011

Mrs. McMorris Rodgers introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from hiring new employees to 
            enforce the individual health insurance mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING OF NEW EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE INDIVIDUAL 
              HEALTH INSURANCE MANDATE.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall not hire any employee to carry 
out or enforce section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 216.10 Records and reports.

Each Agency Bureau will maintain a current list of activities for which Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements are being prepared and for which Negative Determinations and Declarations have been made. Copies of final Initial Environmental Examinations, scoping statements, Assessments and Impact Statements will be available to interested Federal agencies upon request. The cognizant Bureau will maintain a permanent file (which may be part of its normal project files) of Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, final Initial Environmental Examinations, scoping statements, Determinations and Declarations which will be available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act. Interested persons can obtain information or status reports regarding Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements through the A.I.D. Environmental Coordinator.

[45 FR 70249, Oct. 23, 1980]
§ 1631.32 Reasonable and representative tests and recordkeeping requirements—additional requirements. ( a ) Persons issuing guaranties under section 8(a) of the act for small carpets and rugs subject to FF 2-70 shall be subject to all of the requirements of § 1631.31 except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) In lieu of performing tests and maintaining records on the basis of linear yards or square yards as provided in § 1631.31 persons furnishing warranties for small carpets and rugs subject to FF 2-70 shall perform tests and maintain records on the basis of units of carpets or rugs, with “unit” being defined as a single carpet or rug, or on the basis of square yards. At least one test shall be performed upon commencement of production, importation, or other receipt of such small carpet or rug and every 25,000 units or square yards thereafter.
(Sec. 5 of the Act, 67 Stat. 112, as amended by 81 Stat. 570, 15 U.S.C. 1194; sec. 8 of the Act, 67 Stat. 114, as amended by 81 Stat. 572, 15 U.S.C. 1197)
§ 19.6-4 Date of court orders. ( a ) A court order directing or barring payment of a pension to a former spouse under § 19.9 may not be given effect by the Department if it is issued more than 12 months after the divorce becomes final. A court order adjusting the amount of a regular or additional survivor annuity to a former spouse under § 19.11-2 or § 19.10-5 may not be given effect by the Department if it is issued after the death of the principal.
( b ) A court order issued within 12 months after a divorce becomes final directing payment of a pension to a former spouse in an amount other than provided in § 19.9 may be made retroactively effective to the first of the month in which the divorce becomes final if so specified by the court. In such event, the Department will adjust any future payments that may become due to an annuitant and a former spouse by increasing one and correspondingly reducing the other in order to give effect to the order of the court. However, if future payments to one party are not due, as for example if a court orders that no payments be made to a former spouse, or that 100 percent of an annuity be paid as pension to a former spouse, the Department will not give retroactive effect to a court order by collecting overpayments from one party in order to pay them to the other party and will not make overpayments from the Fund.
( c ) A court order under this chapter involving any payment other than a pension to a former spouse under § 19.9 may not be given retroactive effect and shall not be effective until it is determined to be a qualifying order under § 19.6-5.
§ 990.55 Restoration selection—developing restoration plans. ( a ) *General.* OPA requires that damages be based upon a plan developed with opportunity for public review and comment. To meet this requirement, trustees must, at a minimum, develop a Draft and Final Restoration Plan, with an opportunity for public review of and comment on the draft plan.
( b ) *Draft Restoration Plan.* ( 1 ) The Draft Restoration Plan should include: ( i ) A summary of injury assessment procedures used;
( ii ) A description of the nature, degree, and spatial and temporal extent of injuries resulting from the incident;
( iii ) The goals and objectives of restoration;
( iv ) The range of restoration alternatives considered, and a discussion of how such alternatives were developed under § 990.53 of this part, and evaluated under § 990.54 of this part;
( v ) Identification of the trustees' tentative preferred alternative(s);
( vi ) A description of past and proposed involvement of the responsible parties in the assessment; and
( vii ) A description of monitoring for documenting restoration effectiveness, including performance criteria that will be used to determine the success of restoration or need for interim corrective action.
( 2 ) When developing the Draft Restoration Plan, trustees must establish restoration objectives that are specific to the injuries. These objectives should clearly specify the desired outcome, and the performance criteria by which successful restoration will be judged. Performance criteria may include structural, functional, temporal, and/or other demonstrable factors. Trustees must, at a minimum, determine what criteria will: ( i ) Constitute success, such that responsible parties are relieved of responsibility for further restoration actions; or
( ii ) Necessitate corrective actions in order to comply with the terms of a restoration plan or settlement agreement.
( 3 ) The monitoring component to the Draft Restoration Plan should address such factors as duration and frequency of monitoring needed to gauge progress and success, level of sampling needed to detect success or the need for corrective action, and whether monitoring of a reference or control site is needed to determine progress and success. Reasonable monitoring and oversight costs cover those activities necessary to gauge the progress, performance, and success of the restoration actions developed under the plan.
( c ) *Public review and comment.* The nature of public review and comment on the Draft and Final Restoration Plans will depend on the nature of the incident and any applicable federal trustee NEPA requirements, as described in §§ 990.14(d) and 990.23 of this part.
( d ) *Final Restoration Plan.* Trustees must develop a Final Restoration Plan that includes the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section, responses to public comments, if applicable, and an indication of any changes made to the Draft Restoration Plan.
§ 129.7 Policy on embargoes and other proscriptions. ( a ) This section applies to brokering activities defined in § 129.2, regardless of whether the person involved in such activities has registered or is exempt from registration under § 129.3. The exemptions in § 129.5 from the requirement for approval are not applicable to brokering activities subject to this section.
( b ) No person may engage in or make a proposal to engage in brokering activities that involve any country, area, or person referred to in § 126.1 of this subchapter without first obtaining the approval of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
( c ) No person may engage in or make a proposal to engage in brokering activities without first obtaining approval of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls if such activities involve countries or persons identified by the Department of State through notice in the Federal Register, with respect to which certain limitations on defense articles or defense services are imposed for reasons of U.S. national security, foreign policy, or law enforcement interests (e.g., an individual subject to debarment pursuant to § 127.7 of this subchapter). (*See* § 127.1(c) of this subchapter for additional disclosure and approval requirements applicable to brokering activities.)
( d ) It is the policy of the Department of State to deny requests for approval of brokering activities or proposals to engage in brokering activities involving the countries or persons referred to in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section. Any person who knows or has reason to know of brokering activities involving such countries or persons must immediately inform the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
[78 FR 52692, Aug. 26, 2013]