alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Power of Attorney


Know all by these presents, that the undersigned (the "Reporting Person")
hereby constitutes and appoints each of Melanie A. DeMorrow, Assistant Vice
President-Shareholder Relations; Richard M. Lavers, Secretary; Joseph P.
Tomczak, Executive Vice President & C.F.O.; Kathy Samovitz, Associate
Counsel; and Jessica L. Long, Assistant Secretary,  signing singly, as the
Reporting Person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the Reporting Person, in the Reporting
Person's capacity as an officer or trustee of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 and such other similar forms as may be
required for filing in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules
thereunder;

(2) do and perform all acts for and on behalf of the Reporting Person
which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such forms
and timely file such forms with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority or other federal
agency; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
to, and in the best interest of, or legally required by, the Reporting
Person.

The Reporting Person hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the Reporting Person
might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or
revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or
such attorney-in-facts substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to
be done by the virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers
herein granted.  The Reporting Person acknowledges that the foregoing
attorneys-in fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the Reporting
Person, are not assuming, nor is the company assuming, any of the Reporting
Persons responsibilities to comply with any of the above specified laws or
regulations.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
Reporting Person is no longer required to file such forms with respect to the
Reporting Person's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the
Company, unless earlier revoked by the Reporting Person in a signed writing
delivered to the Secretary of  the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Reporting Person has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 15th day of June, 2004.



						s/Claire C. Skinner
#### § 1429.4 Referral of policy questions to the Board.

Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in this subchapter, the General Counsel, the Assistant Secretary, or the Panel may refer for review and decision or general ruling by the Board any case involving a major policy issue that arises in a proceeding before any of them. Any such referral shall be in writing and a copy of such referral shall be served on all parties to the proceeding. Before decision or general ruling, the Board shall obtain the views of the parties and other interested persons, orally or in writing, as it deems necessary and appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001020424
<NAME>                        Convergence Communications, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1.000
<CASH>                        6,097,310
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 6,290,860
<ALLOWANCES>                  (507,324)
<INVENTORY>                   484,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,707,002
<PP&E>                        38,627,207
<DEPRECIATION>                (5,561,033)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                100,745,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         30,226,597
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   9,830
<COMMON>                      11,717
<OTHER-SE>                    45,701,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  100,745,402
<SALES>                       15,851,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              15,851,933
<CGS>                         8,997,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 30,712,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,236,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (16,007,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (94,147)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (16,101,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (14,574,487)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.68)


</TABLE>
Case 3:08-cv-00225-SC Document 74 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-00225-SC Document70 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 2
Case3:08-cv-00225-SC Document70 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-00225-SC Document 74 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15

May 6,
2005

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

We
are aware that Monster Worldwide, Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 and S-8 (Nos.
333-81843, 333-63631, 333-50699, 333-18937, 333-63499, 333-88193, 333-75031, 333-93065,
333-70795, 333-83131, 333-96101, 333-61400, 333-71062, 333-109598, 333-115007 and 333-116004) our report
dated April 25, 2005, relating to the Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements appearing in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005. Pursuant to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a
report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to April 25, 2005.

BDO
Seidman, LLP
New York, NY

---
### §290kk. Applicability to designated programs

#### (a) Designated programs

Subject to subsection (b), this part applies to discretionary and formula grant programs administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration that make awards of financial assistance to public or private entities for the purpose of carrying out activities to prevent or treat substance abuse (in this part referred to as a "designated program"). Designated programs include the program under subpart II of part B of subchapter XVII (relating to formula grants to the States).

#### (b) Limitation

This part does not apply to any award of financial assistance under a designated program for a purpose other than the purpose specified in subsection (a).

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of this part (and subject to subsection (b)):

(1) The term "designated program" has the meaning given such term in subsection (a).

(2) The term "financial assistance" means a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract.

(3) The term "program beneficiary" means an individual who receives program services.

(4) The term "program participant" means a public or private entity that has received financial assistance under a designated program.

(5) The term "program services" means treatment for substance abuse, or preventive services regarding such abuse, provided pursuant to an award of financial assistance under a designated program.

(6) The term "religious organization" means a nonprofit religious organization.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §581, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(7) [title I, §144], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–619.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 581 of act July 1, 1944, is classified to section 290hh of this title.
#### Steel Company of Southern California, Respondent, *v.*Associated Metals *&*Minerals Corporation, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

In the decision of the prior appeal in this action, we were obliged to point out that there was no sufficient showing of the difference between the value of the goods at the time of delivery and the value they would have had if they had answered to the warranty (277 App. Div. 687). On the second trial, while there was an attempt to make this showing, it rested upon general observations that the goods delivered were not as warranted and a claim that the price received for the goods in separate sales over a period of several months was á true reflection of their value. There was no showing as to the differences in quality on the several sales or that the variations in the price were reflections of variations in the quality. The compilation of sales on its face appears to support the contention of appellant that there was a falling market in the product over the period in which the sales were made.

*727Another difficulty in the case is that there is no precise showing of relative values in New York City, which was the place of delivery under the c.i.f. contracts in suit. The showing of values was at Los Angeles, with only an indication that the relative values would have been approximately the same in New York.

We accept the findings of two trial courts that there was a breach of warranty and substantial damage in this case. There is enough in the record to justify a finding of a difference in value of a pound on the material which was not prime. We find that such material totaled 269,226 pounds and such a finding would support a verdict of $8,076.78. We will allow plaintiff a recovery of that amount without requiring another trial. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to a reduction of the judgment to $8,076.78, with interest.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment to $8,076.78, with interest, in which event the judgment, as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 10.13

|To:    |  | Thomas Klein                                                             
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Title: |  | EVP and Group President, Sabre Travel Network and Sabre Airline Solutions
|Date:  |  | February 22, 2006                                                        

Dear Tom,

This
letter is being provided to you to explain the benefits you are eligible to receive, in the event that your employment is involuntarily terminated by Sabre Inc. ("Sabre" or the "Company")
for any reason other than for "cause" (as defined in Sabre Holdings most recent Long Term Incentive Plan) or for non-performance. In order to be eligible to receive the benefits provided
for herein, you must agree to the revocation of the January 26, 2005 letter provided to you regarding severance benefits, and acknowledge your agreement by signing below in the space provided
and returning a copy of this letter to Jae Lynn Rangel, VP Global Compensation.

The
benefits are as follows:

---





2

---



QuickLinks
Part 5318 - Emergency Acquisitions       DAFFARS PART 5318 Knowledge Center          *Revised: June 2023*                                       Subpart 5318.0 – SCOPE OF PART                                                         5318.001 Definition                                                                             Subpart 5318.1 — AVAILABLE ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES                                                         5318.125 Protest to GAO                                                                             Subpart 5318.2 — EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES                                                         5318.201 Contingency Operation                                                            5318.202 Defense or Recovery from Certain Attacks                                                            5318.270 Head of Contracting Activity Determinations    Subpart 5318.0 – SCOPE OF PART               5318.001 Definition       A *Contingency Contracting Officer (CCO)* is a person with contracting authority to enter into, administer, and terminate contracts on behalf of the Government in support of a local contingency, steady-state deployments, or other contingency operations. The CCO also acts as the primary business advisor to the deployed/incident commander or the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) director.Subpart 5318.1 — AVAILABLE ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES               5318.125 Protest to GAO       See MP5301.601(a)(i) and DAFFARS 5333.104.Subpart 5318.2 — EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES                         5318.201 Contingency Operation       (b) *Micro-purchase threshold*. For delegation of HCA responsibility regarding micro-purchases of supplies or services to be used in support of a contingency operation, see MP5301.601(a)(i).         (c) *Simplified acquisition threshold*. For delegation of HCA responsibility regarding an increase in simplified acquisition threshold, see MP5301.601(a)(i).         (1) *Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.* Requirements for the selection, appointment and termination of CCOs are described in DAFFARS 5301.603-2-90.          (S-90) For Air Force Contingency readiness policies, responsibilities, and implementing procedures, see AFI 64-105, *Contingency Contracting Support*.          (S-91) Assign and maintain DoD Activity Address Codes (DoDAAC) for deployed forces within the area of responsibility, as required. See DAFFARS 5304.7003-90.         (2) See MP5301.601(a)((i).5318.202 Defense or Recovery from Certain Attacks       See MP5301.601(a)(i).5318.270 Head of Contracting Activity Determinations       See MP5301.601(a)(i).          (S-90) HQ AFICC is the Department of the Air Force HCA designee for all delegable HCA responsibilities during contingency operations when determined by the HCA and may become the Joint Theater Support Contracting Command (JTSCC) or Joint Task Force Contracting commanding general if designated in the Combatant Commander’s (CCDR) plan IAW AFI 64-105. HCA authorities already delegated to a Senior Contracting Officer or a lower level in MP5301.601(a)(i) will remain in effect and do not need to be re-delegated.
#### § 125.6 [Reserved]
### §2487. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 102–588, title VI, §601, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5130, which related to congressional findings, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 40501 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
§ 214.14 Charter revision. ( a ) Sponsoring A.I.D. Bureaus and Offices initiate revisions to advisory committee charters, as necessary, to reflect current information regarding scope, duties, etc.
( b ) Charter revision requires clearances by the advisory committee, the A.I.D. Advisory Committee Management Officer and the General Counsel; consultation with OMB; approval by the A.I.D. Administrator, and notification of the change to the Federal Register, Congressional committees, and the Library of Congress.
P.1 

OAR Box 1107 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

4DIV-C-10 

Docket Number: 

A-81-21 

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:46 PM Sheet 41 of 90 
P.2 

A-81-2 

IV-C-10 

f. t) *>•-••_ 

Mr. Joseph C. Ledvina j 

Director, Environmental Activities \ 

Vista Chemical Company ' 

15990 North Barker's Landing Road 

Post Office Box 19029 

Houston, Texas 77224 ; 

| 

Dear Mr. Ledvina: I 

This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter, dated July 16, 1985, j 

responding to our request for additional information on comments pertaining 

to the vinyl chloride standard revisions. Your letter has been placed in j 

our confidential file and will be handled according to guidelines governing j 

t 

t 

treatment of confidential business information. This additional information j 

i 

will be considered along with previously submitted comments as we develop ! 

final revisions to the standard. 

Your cooperation in providing the requested information is appreciated. j • 

Sincerely, j 

Robert L. Ajax 

Chief 

Standards Development Branch 

OAQPS/ESED/SDB: WFDimmick, rm 1043, NCM, 541-5578 

(Radian/KKFidler/ibunn/541-9100/07-25-85)
#### § 1101.15 Judicial review.

After having exhausted all administrative remedies set forth in § 1101.7(g)(3) or § 1101.14, a requester may bring a civil action against the Section, in a United States District Court of proper venue, within two years of the final administrative decision which the requester seeks to challenge.
#### § 1701.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (60)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,469
<PP&E>                                         102,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,634)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,498
<BONDS>                                         32,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,496
<SALES>                                         70,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,008
<CGS>                                           52,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                       272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       746
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND 

VICE-CHAIR OF MINOR JUDICIARY

EDUCATION BOARD 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 384 

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2015, Magisterial District Judge Richard 

G. King is hereby designated as Chair of the Minor Judiciary Education Board and 

Magisterial District Judge James K. Reiley, as Vice-Chair, commencing July 1, 2015.
#### Petrelli Associates, Inc., Respondent, v Joseph W. Germano et al., Defendants, and August T. Segreto et al., Appellants.

[717 NYS2d 898]

—In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants August T. Segreto and Denise Segreto appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated March 9, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to dismiss their second counterclaim alleging abuse of process.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellants’ second counterclaim alleging abuse of process failed to state the essential elements for such a claim *(see, Curiano v Suozzi,*63 NY2d 113; *EECP Ctrs. v Vasomedical, Inc.,*265 AD2d 372). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
§ 17.2 Conditions for waiver of recovery of an overpayment. ( a ) *Foreign Service Retirement and Disability System.* Recovery of an overpayment from the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund under the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability System may be waived pursuant to section 4047(d), of title 22, United States Code when the individual is without fault and recovery would be against equity and good conscience or administratively infeasible.
( b ) *Foreign Service Pension System.* Recovery of an overpayment from the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund under the Foreign Service Pension System may be waived pursuant to section 4071(b) of title 22, United States Code and section 8470(b) of title 5, United States Code when the individual is without fault and recovery would be against equity and good conscience.
( c ) When it has been determined that the recipient of an overpayment is ineligible for waiver, the individual is nevertheless entitled to an adjustment in the recovery schedule if he or she shows that it would cause him or her financial hardship to make payment at the rate scheduled.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 142.2 Application. This part applies to all programs or activities directly affecting handicapped individuals in the United States carried on by recipients of Federal financial assistance pursuant to any authority held or delegated by the Secretary of State, including the types of Federal financial assistance listed in appendix A of this part. (appendix A may be revised from time-to-time by notice in the Federal Register.) It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of this regulation, even if the application for such assistance is approved prior to such effective date. This part does not apply to: ( a ) Any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts;
( b ) Money paid, property transferred or other assistance extended before the effective date of this part;
( c ) Any assistance to any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary; and
( d ) Any procurement of goods or services, including the procurement of training. This part does not bar selection and treatment reasonably related to the foreign affairs objective or such other authorized purpose as the Federal assistance may have. It does not bar selections which are limited to particular groups where the purpose of the Federal financial assistance calls for such a limitation, nor does it bar special treatment including special courses of training, orientation or counseling consistent with such purpose.