alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of New York County DES Litigation. Alison Muldoon, Respondent, v Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and West-Ward, Inc., Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 305]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 22, 2000, which granted plaintiffs application that her DES products liability action be tried jointly with several other DES products liability actions, so long as such actions were ready for trial as of Augúst 1, 2000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In view of the circumstance that plaintiffs action and the other DES actions with which it is to be jointly tried pursuant to the appealed order share common questions of law and fact, and that defendants failed to demonstrate that a joint trial of the subject DES actions would be prejudicial to them, joinder of the actions for trial constituted a proper exercise of Trial Term’s discretion *(see,*CPLR 602 [a]; *Heck v Waldbaum’s Supermarkets,*134 AD2d 568; *see also, Matter of New York County DES Litig. [Chernosky v Abbott Labs.],*195 AD2d 415, 416). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
### §2296a–1. Regulations

Within 180 days of October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall issue regulations governing reimbursement under section 2296a of this title. An active uranium or thorium processing site owner shall apply for reimbursement hereunder by submitting a request for the amount of reimbursement, together with reasonable documentation in support thereof, to the Secretary. Any such request for reimbursement, supported by reasonable documentation, shall be approved by the Secretary and reimbursement therefor shall be made in a timely manner subject only to the limitations of section 2296a of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title X, §1002, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2947.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
#### Copelco Capital, Inc., Respondent, v CellularVision of New York, L.P., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[716 NYS2d 95]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages under Uniform Commercial Code article 2-A, the defendants Speed USNY.Com L.P., fZk/a CellularVision of New York, L.P., and CellularVision Capital Corporation, f/k/a Hye Crest Management, Inc., CellularVision of New York, L.P., appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered June 29, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court entered June 11, 1999, *inter alia,*granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against them on the first, fourth, and sixth causes of action, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $135,883.41.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A party moving for summary judgment must make a prima *275facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Here, the plaintiff demonstrated the absence of any material issue of fact with respect to its claim under the Uniform Commercial Code. Therefore, the motion was sufficient to make out a prima facie case for summary judgment *(see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851; *Zuckerman v City of New York, supra).*In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
### §13616. Prohibition of evictions

Any tenant who, except for reservation of a percentage of the units of a project pursuant to section 13612 of this title or any preference for occupancy established pursuant to this subchapter, is lawfully residing in a dwelling unit in a covered section 8 housing project, may not be evicted or otherwise required to vacate such unit because of the reservation or preferences or because of any action taken by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or the owner of the project pursuant to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §656, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3824.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Covered section 8 housing, referred to in text, is defined in section 13619 of this title.
### §16991. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16991 was editorially reclassified as section 20991 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>                               5
       
<S>                                 <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          9,914,282
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      20,011
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        35,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               10,243,100
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 21,116,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,989,585
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                        36,123
<COMMON>                           82,099
<OTHER-SE>                     17,841,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   21,116,125
<SALES>                            28,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   28,336
<CGS>                              91,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,370,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 32,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,376,134)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,376,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,376,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BADI BURGOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2521

[February 1, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John J. Murphy, III, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-9319CF10A. 

Bryan D. Savy, West Melbourne, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of Muzinich BDC, Inc. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul Fehre, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Paul Fehre       | 
|-------------------- | 
|Name: Paul Fehre     | 
|Date: March 30, 2022 |
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     February 10, 2014





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








1


---




ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On February 10, 2014, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2013.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.





2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  February 10, 2014By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued February 10, 2014,  providing information on the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2013 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website February 10, 2014, providing supplemental financial information on the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2013.





4
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  June 19, 2003                  By: /s/ J. Nelson Happy
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Nelson Happy
                                           Vice Chairman, President &
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                           (Principal Executive Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1Plaintiff did not provide the Court with a chambers copy of his request.  For futurereference, plaintiff is reminded of the following provision in the Court’s Standing Orders:  “Inall cases that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties arerequired to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filedelectronically.  The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later thannoon on the day after the document is filed electronically.  The paper copy shall be marked‘Chambers Copy’ and shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly markedwith the judge’s name, case number, and ‘E-Filing Chambers Copy.’”

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKAEL TJUATJA,

Plaintiffs,    v.

CHI MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.P. SHORTAND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendants                                                                      /

No. C-08-0896 MMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’SREQUEST FOR UPDATE

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff Mikael Tjuatja’s request, filed April 7, 2010,1

regarding the status of the above-titled action.

The parties’ respective motions for judgment stand under submission and, if the

Court deems further argument necessary, the matter will be scheduled for a hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  May 3, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00896-MMC   Document 54   Filed 05/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T23:12:20-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 10.1


 


MarkWest Energy
Partners, L.P.


Summary of Director Compensation


 


For 2006, each non-employee director of MarkWest
Hydrocarbon, Inc. will receive:


 


•                  an
annual retainer of $20,000,


 


•                  $2,000
each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting attendance fee,


 


•                  $1,000
committee meeting attendance fee, and


 


•                  an
annual grant of 1,000 shares of restricted stock of MarkWest Hydrocarbon.


 


The respective Chairs of
the Audit Committee and of the Compensation Committee will receive an
additional annual retainer of $4,000 and $2,000, respectively.  Employee
directors receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. 
Directors will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection
with attending board and committee meeting or performing their duties as
directors.
#### Lillian O’Shea, Appellant, v. Ernest Freiberg et al., Respondents.

The circumstances disclose that the user in its inception (or many years later) was not hostile, to the understanding of either or both parties, or made known to be hostile and therefore it was presumptively permissive through acquiescence of respondents and their predecessors. It was only recently asserted to be hostile and then for a period insufficient to ripen *761into an easement by prescription. *(Moore*v. *Day,*199 App. Div. 76, 86, affd. 235 N. Y. 554.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur; Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur in result, on the ground that the record does not establish the easement alleged in the complaint. [See *post,*p. 800.]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING HEARING

RE PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

A further meet-and-confer is SET for WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2010, FROM

8:00–10:30 A.M. in connection with plaintiff’s discovery dispute outlined in counsel’s letter of

January 15. This will take place in the Court’s jury room on the 19th floor. At 10:30 a.m., the

Court shall hold a discovery hearing. Plaintiff’s response is due by 3:00 January 14. 

Counsel are reminded that only those who participate in the further meet-and-confer may

argue at the hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 331 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Nos. 863 and 864.

#### Benedict *v.*Savings Investment & Trust Co., Trustee.

May 17, 1937.

*Mr. James S. Hays*for petitioner. *Mr. Benjamin P. DeWitt*for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION 

Schilling, et al. v. TransCor, et al., USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:08-cv-00941-SI 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN M. SCHILLING, JOHN PINEDO, 

WILLIAM TELLEZ, on behalf of themselves 

and all those similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

TRANSCOR AMERICA, LLC, SGT. JOHN 

SMITH, OFFICER JEFF BRUMMETT, and 

DOES 1 through 100,

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:08-cv-00941-SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: NOTICE OF 

PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION 

The court has received and reviewed the parties Proposed Notice of Pendency of Class 

Action and the proposed method to provide such notice and approves the language. Notice 

shall be given within 30 days of the date of this order and published, as proposed, in Prison 

Legal News for three successive months starting with the first issue in which publication can be 

arranged following the date of this order.

DATED: 

 HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

 JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Case 3:08-cv-00941-SI Document 118 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 1
#### KIERNAN v. CASHIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

February 23, 1905.)

1. Landlord and Tenant—Possession—Summary Proceedings—Parties— Right to Answer.

Under Code Civ. Proe. $ 2244, providing that, when the precept is returnable in summary proceedings to recover land, any person in possession or claiming possession may file with the judge who issued the precept or with the clerk of the court a written answer, etc., a person claiming, to be in possession of the property sued for as undertenant is entitled to intervene and answer.

2. Same—Variance.

Where, in summary proceedings to recover land, a person claiming to be in possession intervened, the fact that he described himself in his answer as undertenant, when in fact he claimed under a new lease to himself, was immaterial.

3. Same—Direction oe Verdict.

Where a verdict in summary proceedings Is set aside by the justice as against the evidence, the justice has no power to direct a verdict, but is limited to ordering a new trial.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 32, Cent Dig. Landlord and Tenant, §§ 1317,1318.],

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District.

Action by Patrick Kiernan against Patrick Cashin and another to recover possession of rented premises. From a final order in favor of plaintiff, Thomas J. Darcey appeals. Modified.

Argued before SCOTT, GIEGERICH, and McCALL, JJ.

James E. Smith, for appellant. .

Seth Sprague Terry, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We consider that the appellant, claiming to be in possession of the premises, had the right to intervene and file an answer (section 2244, Code Civ. Proc.), and that his answer sufficiently raises the issue to which all the evidence was directed. The fact that he describes himself in his answer as undertenant, whereas in fact he claims under a new lease to himself, is immaterial.

We are not disposed to interfere with the exercise of his discretion by the justice in setting aside the verdict. We think, however, that he erred in granting judgment in favor of the landlord. It has repeatedly been held that, where a jury trial has-been had in summary proceedings, the justice has no power to direct a verdict. George v. Trevellyn, 12 Misc. Rep. 153, 33 N. Y.Supp. 16. Upon the same principle, a justice who sets aside the verdict of a jury as against the evidence should content himself with ordering a new trial.

*256The order appealed from must be modified by striking out the direction for a judgment in favor of the landlord, and inserting in place thereof a direction for a new trial, and, as so modified, will be affirmed, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CLOROX COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AS
PRESENTED IN THE CLOROX COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FILED FOR SUCH PERIOD AND AS
RESTATED HEREIN, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           67804
<SECURITIES>                                     45928
<RECEIVABLES>                                   389996
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1521
<INVENTORY>                                     210220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                747811
<PP&E>                                         1048322
<DEPRECIATION>                                  473900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2871644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           671665
<BONDS>                                         907570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         55422
<OTHER-SE>                                      969444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2871644
<SALES>                                        1770197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1770197
<CGS>                                           780849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1441729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2356)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               39247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 291577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    116532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             175045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    175045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>