alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Sander, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Sander     
|                         |  |  |  | Charles Sander         
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 120.67 Empowered official. ( a ) *Empowered official* means a U.S. person who: ( 1 ) Is directly employed by the applicant or a subsidiary in a position having authority for policy or management within the applicant organization; and
( 2 ) Is legally empowered in writing by the applicant to sign license applications or other requests for approval on behalf of the applicant; and
( 3 ) Understands the provisions and requirements of the various export control statutes and regulations, and the criminal liability, civil liability, and administrative penalties for violating the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations in this subchapter; and
( 4 ) Has the independent authority to: ( i ) Inquire into any aspect of a proposed export, temporary import, or brokering activity by the applicant;
( ii ) Verify the legality of the transaction and the accuracy of the information to be submitted; and
( iii ) Refuse to sign any license application or other request for approval without prejudice or other adverse recourse.
( b ) For the purposes of a broker who is a foreign person, the empowered official may be a foreign person who otherwise meets the criteria for an empowered official in paragraph (a) of this section.
### §285l–1. Applied Toxicological Research and Testing Program

(a) There is established within the Institute a program for conducting applied research and testing regarding toxicology, which program shall be known as the Applied Toxicological Research and Testing Program.

(b) In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Director of the Institute shall, with respect to toxicology, carry out activities—

(1) to expand knowledge of the health effects of environmental agents;

(2) to broaden the spectrum of toxicology information that is obtained on selected chemicals;

(3) to develop and validate assays and protocols, including alternative methods that can reduce or eliminate the use of animals in acute or chronic safety testing;

(4) to establish criteria for the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative testing and to recommend a process through which scientifically validated alternative methods can be accepted for regulatory use;

(5) to communicate the results of research to government agencies, to medical, scientific, and regulatory communities, and to the public; and

(6) to integrate related activities of the Department of Health and Human Services.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §463A, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title XIII, §1301(a), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 169.)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                          (000S, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
                                                              MARCH 31, 2001
                                                         -----------------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Net income                                                         $ 1,449

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                    8,470

Basic earnings per share                                           $  0.17
                                                                   =======



Net income                                                         $ 1,449

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                    8,470
Dilutive stock options                                                  42
                                                                   -------
                                                                     8,512

Earnings per share assuming dilution                               $  0.17
                                                                   =======
</TABLE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# COMSECY-16-0012:  Correction to Federal Notice Discontinuing Rulemaking Activities

Accession Number: ML16165A253

Date Released: Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16165A264 - COMSECY-16-0012:  Correction to Federal Notice Discontinuing Rulemaking Activities (3 page(s), 7/5/2016)
    - ML16165A397 - COMSECY-16-0012:  Enclosure 1 - Correction to Federal Register Notice Discontinuing Rulemaking Activities (3 page(s), 7/5/2016)
    - ML16165A470 - COMSECY-16-0012:  Enclosure 2 - Correction to Federal Register Notice Discounting Rulemaking Activities (13 page(s), 7/5/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Appendices 

Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides 

on Bureau of Land Management Lands in 

17 Western States Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement 

Volume 2 

Prepared by 

Bureau of Land Management 

Nevada State Office 

Reno, Nevada

June 2007
#### Marion G. Drescher, Respondent, v. Charles R. Agnello, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

All concur. (Appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Agnello on the ground of inadequacy, and for a new trial, in an automobile negligence action.) Present— Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
### §§2624 to 2628. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–203, title VII, §714, formerly title VI, §614, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 883; renumbered title VII, §714, Pub. L. 93–567, title I, §101, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1845

Section 2624, Pub. L. 87–415, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 90–636, §13, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1355, set out Congressional declaration of purpose in providing for supplementary State programs.

Section 2625, Pub. L. 87–415, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 90–636, §13, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1356, provided authorization for grants for supplementary State programs.

Section 2626, Pub. L. 87–415, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 90–636, §13, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1356, provided for applications for supplementary State programs and conditions for such programs.

Section 2627, Pub. L. 87–415, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 90–636, §13, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1356, provided for promulgation of rules and regulations.

Section 2628, Pub. L. 87–415, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 90–636, §13, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1356, authorized appropriations for supplementary State programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 93–203, title VII, §714, formerly title VI, §614, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 883; renumbered title VII, §714, Pub. L. 93–567, title I, §101, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1845, provided that the repeal is effective with respect to fiscal years after June 30, 1974.
§ 124.7 Information required in all manufacturing license agreements and technical assistance agreements. ( a ) The following information must be included in all proposed manufacturing license agreements and technical assistance agreements. The information should be provided in terms which are as precise as possible. If the applicant believes that a clause or that required information is not relevant or necessary, the applicant may request the omission of the clause or information. The transmittal letter accompanying the agreement must state the reasons for any proposed variation in the clauses or required information. ( 1 ) The agreement must describe the defense article to be manufactured and all defense articles to be exported, including any test and support equipment or advanced materials. They should be described by military nomenclature, contract number, National Stock Number, nameplate data, or other specific information. Only defense articles listed in the agreement will be eligible for export under the exemption in § 123.16(b)(1) of this subchapter.
( 2 ) The agreement must specifically describe the assistance and technical data, including the design and manufacturing know-how involved, to be furnished and any manufacturing rights to be granted;
( 3 ) The agreement must specify its duration; and
( 4 ) The agreement must specifically identify the countries or areas in which manufacturing, production, processing, sale or other form of transfer is to be licensed.
( b ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 39305, July 22, 1993, as amended at 81 FR 54736, Aug. 17, 2016]
#### In the Matter of Daniel J. Smith against Stephen P. Kennedy, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with -$10 -costs. -Concur — ¡Botein, P. J., 'Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §2258. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy abolished

#### (a) Abolition

The Joint Committee on Atomic Energy is abolished.

#### (b) References in rules, etc., on and after September 20, 1977

Any reference in any rule, resolution, or order of the Senate or the House of Representatives or in any law, regulation, or Executive order to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy shall, on and after September 20, 1977, be considered as referring to the committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives which, under the rules of the Senate and the House, have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such reference.

#### (c) Transfer of records, data, etc.; copies

All records, data, charts, and files of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy are transferred to the committees of the Senate and House of Representatives which, under the rules of the Senate and the House, have jurisdiction over the subject matters to which such records, data, charts, and files relate. In the event that any record, data, chart, or file shall be within the jurisdiction of more than one committee, duplicate copies shall be provided upon request.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §301, as added Pub. L. 95–110, §1, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 884; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)
§ 138.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $24,496 and not more than $244,958 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $24,496 and not more than $244,958 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $24,100, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $24,496 and $244,958, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
[55 FR 6737, 6749, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 81 FR 36793, June 8, 2016; 82 FR 3170, Jan. 11, 2017; 83 FR 237, Jan. 3, 2018; 84 FR 9959, Mar. 19, 2019; 85 FR 2022, Jan. 14, 2020; 86 FR 7807, Feb. 2, 2021; 87 FR 1074, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 1507, Jan. 11, 2023; 89 FR 702, Jan. 5, 2024]
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

9 , 2012 TO: RI CE NESHAP Docket, EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2008
- 0708 FROM: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG SUBJECT: June 26, 2012 Conference Call Regarding Proposed Amendments to the RICE

NESHAP
**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 26 , 2012 to discuss the proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
. The amendments were propo sed on June 7, 2012. **ATTENDEES** Eric Ginsburg , EPA Christina Simeone, PennFuture Robert Wayland , EPA Hilary Sinnamon, Red Mountain Group Melanie King, EPA Courtney L ane, PennFuture Michael Horowitz , EPA Rachel Clark, Conservation L aw Foundation Mark Kresowik, Sierra Club Paul Miller, NESCAUM Justin Vickiers, Environmental Law and Policy Center
§ 1500.4 Open meetings. ( a ) Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of Foundation business other than in accordance with these procedures. Every portion of every meeting of the Board of Directors shall be open to public observation, subject to the exceptions provided in § 1500.5.
( b ) The Secretary of the Foundation shall be responsible for assuring that ample space, sufficient visibility, and adequate acoustics are provided for public observation of meetings of the Board of Directors.
### Please place this document in the NOx SOx secondary docket Bryan Hubbell to: Tricia Crabtree 10/05/2010 09:55 AM

Thanks! Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell Senior Advisor for Science and Policy Analysis Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02) RTP, NC 27711 (919) 541-0621 ----- Forwarded by Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/05/2010 09:55 AM -----

From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US To: Angela Nugent/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 10/04/2010 10:44 AM Subject: Re: Suggestion from Ted Russell re: this week's CASAC Nox&SOx Secondary NAAQPS Panel meeting Angela, here is the final response to Ted's request -- the attached is a revised Figure 8-1, addressing the comments from Ted. Thanks, Bryan

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell Senior Advisor for Science and Policy Analysis Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02) RTP, NC 27711 (919) 541-0621 Angela Nugent 10/04/2010 08:06:36 AM Hello Lydia, Ted Russell asked me to mention t...

From: Angela Nugent/DC/USEPA/US To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 10/04/2010 08:06 AM Subject: Suggestion from Ted Russell re: this week's CASAC Nox&SOx Secondary NAAQPS Panel meeting Hello Lydia, Ted Russell asked me to mention that it would be helpful for this week's CASAC panel to hear a couple of things from you since many of them have limited history with the NAAQS process. He thought it would help them out to hear - what the "elements of the standard" consist of and how they are used in regulation - what the next steps in the NAAQS process will be after the CASAC meeting.Will it work for you to fit a brief description of those two items into your remarks on Wednesday? Looking forward to seeing you then - best, Angela

_

_____________________________________ _ Angela Nugent, Ph.D. Special Assistant/Designated Federal Officer EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office Mailing Address: US.Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode 1400R 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Physical Location/Deliveries The Science Advisory Board Staff Office Ronald Reagan Building 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue Suite 31150 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: 202-564-2218; Main Fax: 202-565-2098 Secure Fax: 202-565-2091 Email: nugent.angela@epa.gov
#### § 1508.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a participant if a principal of the transaction is excluded?

As an agency official, you may not enter into a covered transaction with a participant if you know that a principal of the transaction is excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 1508.120.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3912 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3912

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, as the ``Brigadier General 
               Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BRIGADIER GENERAL NATHANIEL WOODHULL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Brigadier General Nathaniel Woodhull Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier 
General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Walston *&*Co., Inc. v. Ernest Klein.

Motion for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, J J.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\5634\Order re March 12 hearing.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIRTRANSPORTATION ANTITRUSTLITIGATION                                                                      /

This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS                                                                      /

No. C 07-05634 CRB

MDL 1913

ORDER

The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a

determination of the applicability of the Bankruptcy Court’s injunction to these proceedings. 

The merits of those motions will therefore not be the subject of the hearing scheduled for

March 12, 2010.  Instead, the parties should be prepared to discuss the merits of Defendants’

Motion To Stay Proceedings Upon Notice of Injunction in In Re: Japan Airlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB   Document 20   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-08T18:09:35-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### Willie M. Lee et al., Appellants, v City School District of the City of White Plains, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., which was automatically dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 9, 1976, which denied their motion to restore the action to the calendar and to compel the defendant-respondent to submit to an examination before trial. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The affirmation in support of plaintiffs’ motion states as an excuse for the failure to file a statement of readiness that the prior attorney was opening his own practice and moving into a new office. In our opinion, the default was basically a "law office failure”. Such excuses "have been weighed in the balance many times and found wanting” *(Goldberg v Soifer,*30 AD2d 533, 534). Further, the level of activity between the time the note of issue was filed and the time of the instant motion was insufficient to rebut the presumption that the action had been abandoned (cf. *Marco v Sachs,*10 NY2d 542). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.