alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §290bb–23. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §517, formerly §509A, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4005(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–113; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2051(d), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4206; renumbered §517 and amended Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §114, July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 346; Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXI, §3103, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1171, related to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation model projects for high risk youth.

A prior section 517 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 290cc–2 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §123(c), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 363.
#### § 270.8b-20 Additional information.

In addition to the information expressly required to be included in a registration statement or report, there shall be added such further material information, if any, as may be necessary to make the required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.

[18 FR 8576, Dec. 19, 1953]
Attachment 005

These pages have been omitted as Confidential Business Information
Exhibit
10.42


 


THE SCO
GROUP, INC.


SUMMARY
OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


 


The following table sets
for the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers of The SCO
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for fiscal year 2006:


	
  Executive
  Officer

  	
   

  	
  Base
  Salary

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Darl
  C. McBride

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  President and Chief
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $265,000

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Bert
  B. Young

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $170,000

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Christopher
  Sontag

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President,
  Business Development

  	
   

  	
  $160,000

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Jeff
  F. Hunsaker

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President and
  General Manager, UNIX Division

  	
   

  	
  $160,000

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ryan
  Tibbitts

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  General Counsel and
  Corporate Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $160,000

  



 


In addition to the
foregoing amounts, each of the officers named above is eligible to receive
additional cash compensation pursuant to The SCO Group Employee Incentive Bonus
Program for fiscal year 2006 or the America Sales Compensation Plan for fiscal
year 2006.
4.2303          FASCSA orders.       (a)                   Executive agencies are prohibited from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any covered article, or any products or services produced or provided by a source, including contractor use of covered articles or sources, if that prohibition is established by an applicable FASCSA order issued by the Director of National Intelligence, Secretary of Defense, or Secretary of Homeland Security (the “issuing official”)(see 41 CFR 201–1.304(a)).                                          (b)                   If a covered article or the source is subject to an applicable Governmentwide FASCSA order issued collectively by the Director of National Intelligence, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of Homeland Security, executive agencies responsible for management of the Federal Supply Schedules, Governmentwide acquisition contracts, and multi-agency contracts shall facilitate implementation of a collective FASCSA order by removing the covered articles or sources identified in the FASCSA order from such contracts (see 41 CFR 201–1.303(g)).                                          (c)                                                         (1)                         FASCSA orders regarding sources or covered articles will be found in the System for Award Management (SAM), by searching for the phrase “FASCSA order”. SAM may be updated as new FASCSA orders are issued.                                                            (2)                         Some FASCSA orders will not be identified in SAM and will need to be identified in the solicitation to be effective for that acquisition. The requiring activity or program office will identify these FASCSA orders to the contracting officer (see 4.2304(d)).                                                            (3)                         The contracting officer shall work with the program office or requiring activity to identify which FASCSA orders apply to the acquisition.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.23 Federal Acquisition Security Council.
§ 39.27 Legal risk considerations. ( a ) *Legal authorization.* A derivatives clearing organization shall be duly organized, legally authorized to conduct business, and remain in good standing at all times in the relevant jurisdictions. If the derivatives clearing organization provides clearing services outside the United States, it shall be duly organized to conduct business and remain in good standing at all times in the relevant jurisdictions, and be authorized by the appropriate foreign licensing authority.
( b ) *Legal framework.* A derivatives clearing organization shall operate pursuant to a well-founded, transparent, and enforceable legal framework that addresses each aspect of the activities of the derivatives clearing organization. As applicable, the framework shall provide for: ( 1 ) The derivatives clearing organization to act as a counterparty, including novation;
( 2 ) Netting arrangements;
( 3 ) The derivatives clearing organization's interest in collateral;
( 4 ) The steps that a derivatives clearing organization would take to address a default of a clearing member, including but not limited to, the unimpeded ability to liquidate collateral and close out or transfer positions in a timely manner;
( 5 ) Finality of settlement and funds transfers that are irrevocable and unconditional when effected (no later than when a derivatives clearing organization's accounts are debited and credited); and
( 6 ) Other significant aspects of the derivatives clearing organization's operations, risk management procedures, and related requirements.
( c ) *Conflict of laws.* If a derivatives clearing organization provides clearing services outside the United States: ( 1 ) The derivatives clearing organization shall identify and address any material conflict of law issues. The derivatives clearing organization's contractual agreements shall specify a choice of law.
( 2 ) The derivatives clearing organization shall be able to demonstrate the enforceability of its choice of law in relevant jurisdictions and that its rules, procedures, and contracts are enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions.
( 3 ) The derivatives clearing organization shall ensure on an ongoing basis that the memorandum required in paragraph (b) of Exhibit R to appendix A to this part is accurate and up to date and shall submit an updated memorandum to the Commission promptly following all material changes to the analysis or content contained in the memorandum.
[76 FR 69430, Nov. 8, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 4862, Jan. 27, 2020]
2006 Performance Measures under Annual Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 2006 Performance Measures under Annual Incentive Plan 
  
 For 2006, the Compensation Committee established the following performance measures under the Annual Incentive Plan: 
  
 Adjusted OROOA (operating profit divided by operating assets) for all
business units except CST 
  
 For CST, adjusted OROOA plus CST
Profitability and Revenue Growth
EX-10.1



 







	10.1	 	Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement of J. Brian Patsy





Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement




          This AMENDMENT NO. 2 is entered into as of this 27 day of January, 2006 by and among LanVision
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), LanVision, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“Company”)
and J. Brian Patsy (“Employee”).




 









 








          WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of February 1,
2003 (“Employment Agreement”), as amended, whereby Parent and the Company agreed to employ the
Employee; and




          WHEREAS, Parent, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth herein;




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the parties hereby
acknowledge, the parties agree as follows:



In consideration of the Employee’ responsibilities and roles, Parent and the Company agree to pay
Employee effective February 1, 2006, Employee’s salary for the period commencing on such date
through January 31, 2007 shall be Two Hundred Forty-four Thousand five-hundred nineteen Dollars
($244,519).



Continuing Agreement. Except for the changes set forth in this Amendment No. 2 the Employment
Agreement remains in full force and effect without modification.



Counterparts. This Amendment No. 2 may be signed in counterparts by Parent, the Company and
Employee.”




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date set forth
above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LanVision Systems, Inc.  
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Paul W. Bridge, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Paul W. Bridge, Jr.
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LanVision, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Paul W. Bridge, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Paul W. Bridge, Jr.
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Employee
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ J. Brian Patsy
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	J. Brian Patsy
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

HEYWARD JOSEPH TUMLIN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1603-97-3 PER CURIAM 

 NOVEMBER 18, 1997 

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 

 AND TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY 

 OF ILLINOIS 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Heyward J. Tumlin, pro se, on brief). 

 (Gregory T. Casker; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley & 

Smitherman, on brief), for appellees. 

 Heyward J. Tumlin (claimant) contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in finding that the applicable 

statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-708 barred the 

commission from considering claimant's April 15, 1997 application 

alleging a change-in-condition. Upon reviewing the record and 

the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's 

decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 On May 18, 1990, claimant sustained a compensable injury by 

accident. Claimant received temporary total disability benefits, 

pursuant to an award, from May 19, 1990 through August 12, 1990. 

 In a July 25, 1995 opinion, the commission upheld the deputy 

commissioner's award of permanent partial disability benefits for 

a period of 56.25 weeks beginning June 11, 1991 and ending July 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

8, 1992. 

 On April 15, 1997, claimant filed an application requesting 

reinstatement of compensation benefits. The commission denied 

his application, finding it was not timely filed pursuant to Code 

§ 65.2-708. 

 Code § 65.2-708 clearly and unequivocally provides that an 

award shall not be reviewed "after twenty-four months from the 

last day for which compensation was paid, pursuant to an award 

under this title . . . ." This section required that claimant's 

application alleging a change in condition be filed within 

twenty-four months from July 8, 1992, the last day for which 

compensation was paid. Claimant filed his application on April 

15, 1997, more than twenty-four months after July 8, 1992. 

Accordingly, the commission did not err in finding that 

claimant's April 15, 1997 application was not timely filed, and, 

therefore, could not be considered by the commission. 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Wayne A. Eastman, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
    ---------------------------
    Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
    Principal Executive Officer
    May 24, 2004




<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel Marcus, (Acting) Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joel Marcus
   ----------------
    Joel Marcus
    Chief Financial Officer
    May 24, 2004



<PAGE>





<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lilly Jacobs, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellant perfects appeal, flies note of issue, and files and serves record and brief on or before August 1, 1960 and is ready for argument at the September Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied. Present — Bergan, P. J,, Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### Frances Robinson, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 21, 1977, denying proposed defendant’s motion to vacate a default in opposing proposed plaintiff’s renewed motion to serve a late notice of claim, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements; and said motion to vacate default is granted; the proposed opposing affirmation of Milton M. Miller, dated June 1, 1977, is deemed interposed as of the date of the order determining this appeal; and proposed plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim may be resubmitted by either party to Special Term on five days’ notice for determination on the merits. The proposed plaintiff’s previous motion to file a late notice of claim was denied on March 16, 1977, with leave to renew on proper papers. On that original motion, the retained attorneys appeared for proposed defendant. Proposed plaintiff then served a new notice of motion for the same relief. Instead of serving it upon the attorneys who had appeared on the previous application, as would be required by CPLR 2103 (subd [b]) in the case of a renewal, proposed plaintiff served a new notice of motion on the proposed defendant directly. The resulting delay involving proposed defendant sending the papers to its insurance company, which in turn had to send them to the attorneys, is largely responsible for the default. This was not a case of law office failure on the part of the proposed defendant but rather of defective service by proposed plaintiff. Such minor delay as occurred thereafter on the part of proposed defendant did not warrant depriving proposed defendant of the opportunity to oppose the motion on the merits. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
### §17141. Prohibition on incandescent lamps by Coast Guard

#### (a) Prohibition

Except as provided by subsection (b), on and after January 1, 2009, a general service incandescent lamp shall not be purchased or installed in a Coast Guard facility by or on behalf of the Coast Guard.

#### (b) Exception

A general service incandescent lamp may be purchased, installed, and used in a Coast Guard facility whenever the application of a general service incandescent lamp is—

(1) necessary due to purpose or design, including medical, security, and industrial applications;

(2) reasonable due to the architectural or historical value of a light fixture installed before January 1, 2009; or

(3) the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines that operational requirements necessitate the use of a general service incandescent lamp.

#### (c) Limitation

In this section, the term "facility" does not include a vessel or aircraft of the Coast Guard.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §522, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1662.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            8762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6097
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18402
<PP&E>                                            3303
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (2051)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                       13304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19803
<SALES>                                           4173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4173
<CGS>                                             3314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (2423)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2323
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (708)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (1095)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2710)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.67)


</TABLE>
### §290bb–36d. Treatment Referral Routing Service

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary, shall maintain the National Treatment Referral Routing Service (referred to in this section as the "Routing Service") to assist individuals and families in locating mental and substance use disorders treatment providers.

#### (b) Activities of the Secretary

To maintain the Routing Service, the activities of the Assistant Secretary shall include administering—

(1) a nationwide, telephone number providing year-round access to information that is updated on a regular basis regarding local behavioral health providers and community-based organizations in a manner that is confidential, without requiring individuals to identify themselves, is in languages that include at least English and Spanish, and is at no cost to the individual using the Routing Service; and

(2) an Internet website to provide a searchable, online treatment services locator of behavioral health treatment providers and community-based organizations, which shall include information on the name, location, contact information, and basic services provided by such providers and organizations.

#### (c) Removing practitioner contact information

In the event that the Internet website described in subsection (b)(2) contains information on any practitioner who prescribes narcotic drugs in schedule III, IV, or V of section 812 of title 21 for the purpose of maintenance or detoxification treatment, the Assistant Secretary—

(1) shall provide an opportunity to such practitioner to have the contact information of the practitioner removed from the website at the request of the practitioner; and

(2) may evaluate other methods to periodically update the information displayed on such website.

#### (d) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the Assistant Secretary from using any unobligated amounts otherwise made available to the Administration to maintain the Routing Service.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §520E–4, as added Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9006, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1239; amended Pub. L. 117–215, title I, §103(b)(3)(A), Dec. 2, 2022, 136 Stat. 2263; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1262(b)(3), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–328, which directed substitution of "information on any practitioner who prescribes narcotic drugs in schedule III, IV, or V of section 812 of title 21 for the purpose of maintenance or detoxification treatment" for "information on any qualified practitioner that is certified to prescribe medication for opioid dependency under section 823(g)(2)(B) of title 21", was executed in introductory provisions by making the substitution for "information on any qualified practitioner that is certified to prescribe medication for opioid dependency under section 823(h)(2)(B) of title 21", to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the intervening amendment by Pub. L. 117–215. See Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 117–215 substituted "823(h)(2)(B)" for "823(g)(2)(B)" in introductory provisions.