alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 270.18c-2 Exemptions of certain debentures issued by small business investment companies. ( a ) The issuance or sale of any class of senior security representing indebtedness by a small business investment company licensed under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 shall not be prohibited by section 18(c) of the Act provided such senior security representing indebtedness is ( 1 ) not convertible into, exchangeable for, or accompanied by an option to acquire any equity security;
( 2 ) fully guaranteed as to timely payment of all principal and interest by the Small Business Administration and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States; and
( 3 ) subordinated to any other debt securities not issued pursuant to this section or, if such security is not so subordinated, that such security, according to its own terms, will not be preferred over any other unsecured debt securities in the payment of principal and interest: *And further provided,* That all other debt securities then outstanding issued by such small business investment company were issued as permitted by § 270.18c-1 or this section.
( b ) Any security issued and sold as permitted by paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed for purposes of § 270.18c-1 to be privately held by the Small Business Administration and for purposes of § 270.18c-1 shall not be deemed to be publicly held outstanding indebtedness.
( c ) The issuance or sale of any security as permitted by paragraph (a) of this section shall not be deemed to be a sale to any person other than the Small Business Administration by any small business investment company licensed under the Small Business Investment Company Act of 1958 which is exempt from any provision of the Investment Company Act, if such exemption is conditioned on such company not offering or selling its securities to any person other than the Small Business Administration.
(Secs. 6(c), 38(a), 54 Stat. 800, 841, 15 U.S.C. 80a-6(c), 80a-37(a))
[37 FR 7590, Apr. 18, 1972]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 19, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00188

- CR

Hardy Burl PURVIS IV

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 0050

- CR

- B

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Patricia Wagner, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record, has

filed a notification of late reporter’s record requesting an extension to September 14, 2019. We

grant her request and order her to file the reporter’s record by September 14, 2019.

It is s o ORDERED on August 19, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ )

LASHAWN MICHELLE MINOR

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1 3

- 1793 (ESH)

)

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF )

AMERICA

, )

)

Defendant

. )

__________ _________________________ )

ORDER

On November 20, 2013, defendant Laboratory Corporation of America filed a motion to

dismiss the complaint [ ECF No. 5]. This C ourt issued an order directing the plaintiff

, Lashawn

Michelle Minor , to respond to the motion to dismiss no later than December 20, 2013 , and

informing her that if she did not timely r espond, the motion could be deemed conceded under

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) . (Order, Nov. 20, 2013 [ ECF No. 7 ].) Plaintiff has not filed

any response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant ’ s motion to dismiss is GRANTED as conceded and

plaintiff ’ s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

.

/s/

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE

United States District Judge

Date: December 30 , 2013
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2011- . OO^C f

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B YTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNFZE D DOCKE T Q'il-ZO' L0 0 9 0 ACTIO N DAT E _4_2_2 ^ ' Thi s approval vx

A T" ' -'•"•—;'---• ; .;p.^,,•.^: | • •; • -^.bject, wher e applicable , to condition s pi\' . . . Thi s actio n i!: : iM

i , , ' . : ' , '.' ' • or : i s filedunder 14 CF R^85.3 0 O

: : : .,•••, : ..-L'cp^irtmcnt' s own motion . I n vie w o f th e agr^c. i ...' : : ; .,.;c^..:;!jveri;;. i L-.atiir e x A th e availability o f th e above-«roctdure , the^l^ y PSXio di n M CF R303.4 2 i s waived . ector . Offic e o f

International Aviatio n 6 Ma y201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St . N.W . #12'^

Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6

M b
#### § 1507.2 General policies.

It is the policy of the Foundation to safeguard the right of privacy of any individual as to whom the Foundation maintains personal information in any records system, and to provide such individuals with appropriate and complete access to such records, including adequate opportunity to correct any errors in said records. It is further the policy of the Foundation to maintain its records in such a fashion that the information contained therein is, and remains, material and relevant to the purposes for which it is collected. Information in such records will be collected, maintained, used or disseminated in a manner that assures that such action is for a necessary and lawful purpose, and that adequate safeguards are provided to prevent misuse of such information. Exemptions from records requirements provided in 5 U.S.C. 552a will be permitted only where an important public policy need for such exemptions has been determined pursuant to specific statutory authority.
No. 881.

#### New York Life Insurance Co. *v.*Freedom Casket Co.

May 3, 1937.

*Messrs. William H. Eckert*and *Louis H. Cooke*for petitioner. *Mr. Charles J. Margiotti*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
#### Frank E. Nash, Doing Business under the Name of Frank E. Nash Fence Company, Respondent, v. Frank Mennan, as President of Local Union 580 of the Ornamental and Architectural Iron Workers, et al., Appellants.

The allegations of the second affirmative defense must be accredited, for the purposes of the motion to dismiss, as were the allegations of the complaint on the previous motion to dismiss that pleading. *(Nash*v. *Mennan,*275 App. Div. 674.) In passing on the sufficiency of the second defense, it must be assumed that there is no bargaining agreement with a rival union. Such other or contrary facts alleged in the complaint (denied in the answer) as would render the provisions of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act inapplicable may not be considered on this motion. (3 Carmody on New York Pleading and Practice, § 1051.) As a matter of pleading, therefore, the second defense is sufficient. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### §211c. Promotion credit for medical officers in assistant grade

Any medical officer of the Regular Corps of the Public Health Service who—

(1)(A) was appointed to the assistant grade in the Regular Corps and whose service in such Corps has been continuous from the date of appointment or (B) may hereafter be appointed to the assistant grade in the Regular Corps, and

(2) had or will have completed a medical internship on the date of such appointment,

shall be credited with one year for purposes of promotion and seniority in grade, except that no such credit shall be authorized if the officer has received or will receive similar credit for his internship under other provisions of law. In the case of an officer on active duty on the effective date of this section who is entitled to the credit authorized herein, the one year shall be added to the promotion and seniority-in-grade credits with which he is credited on such date.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §220, as added Apr. 30, 1956, ch. 223, §3, 70 Stat. 121.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For "the effective date of this section", referred to in text, see section 7 of act Apr. 30, 1956, which provided in part that this section shall become effective the first day of the month following the day of enactment, Apr. 30, 1956.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Public Health Service, Surgeon General of Public Health Service, and all other officers and employees of Public Health Service, and functions of all agencies of or in Public Health Service transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, set out as a note under section 202 of this title.
#### § 171.10 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the rules that the Department follows under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552. The rules should be read together with the FOIA, which provides additional information about access to records and contains the specific exemptions that are applicable for withholding information; the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines) (*see www.justice.gov/oip/foia-resources#s5*); and information located at *www.foia.state.gov.*
532.7204 Suspension and disapproval of amounts claimed. 		    (a)  The contracting officer shall notify the appropriate contract finance office in writing when amounts claimed for payment are— 					           						             							              (1)  Suspended; 						             						             							              (2)  Disapproved as not being allowable according to contract terms; or 						             						             							              (3)  Not allocable to the contract. 						             					           				         				         					          (b)  The contracting officer’s notice forms the basis for the contract finance office to issue GSA Form 533-1, Administrative Difference Statement. Finance will attach a copy of GSA Form 533-1 to each copy of the invoice or voucher from which the deduction has been made, and will include an explanation of the deduction. 	  **Parent topic:** Subpart 532.72 - Payments Under Contracts Subject to Audit
§ 1508.335 What information must I provide before entering into a covered transaction with the African Development Foundation? Before you enter into a covered transaction at the primary tier, you as the participant must notify the ADF office that is entering into the transaction with you, if you know that you or any of the principals for that covered transaction: ( a ) Are presently excluded or disqualified;
( b ) Have been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in § 1508.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against you for one of those offenses within that time period;
( c ) Are presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in § 1508.800(a); or
( d ) Have had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default.
Order filed October 4, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00019-CV

____________

BAYTOWN AGAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC., Appellant

V.

CITY OF BAYTOWN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-18127

ORDER

On August 2, 2022, appellee’s unopposed motion to extend time to file 

appellee’s brief because the parties were engaged in settlement negotiations was 

granted and the appeal was abated until September 26, 2022. 

No motion to dismiss, other dispositive motion, motion to reinstate, or 

motion to continue the abatement has been filed. The appeal is reinstated. 

Appellee’s brief is due thirty days from the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot and Zimmerer.
#### Charlotte Milch, Respondent, v. Morris Milch, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
§ 1006.725 How much time do I have to contest a suspension? ( a ) As a respondent you or your representative must either send, or make rrangements to appear and present, the information and argument to the suspending official within 30 days after you receive the Notice of Suspension.
( b ) We consider the notice to be received by you— ( 1 ) When delivered, if we mail the notice to the last known street address, or five days after we send it if the letter is undeliverable;
( 2 ) When sent, if we send the notice by facsimile or five days after we send it if the facsimile is undeliverable; or
( 3 ) When delivered, if we send the notice by e-mail or five days after we send it if the e-mail is undeliverable.
Case3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document168 Filed08/11/10 Page1 of 7

CONTINUING

Case 3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document 170 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document 170 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 4 Case3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document168 Filed08/11/10 Page2 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document 170 Filed 08/12/10 Page 3 of 4 Case3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document168 Filed08/11/10 Page3 of 7
Case3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document168-1 Filed08/11/10 Page1 of 1

it is HEREBY ORDERED that the case management conference 

is continued to September 24, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. The parties' 

joint case management conference statement remains due on 

September 3, 2010. 11

The Court has deleted the signature pages numbered 4-7 to conserve paper and space.

Case 3:08-cv-01341-JSW Document 170 Filed 08/12/10 Page 4 of 4
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/
      JAMES H. LONG


James H. Long


Chief Executive Officer





May
      4,
      2007
Sixteenth Census of the United States: 1940

Population: Estimates of Labor Force, Employment, and Unemployment in

the United States, 1940-1930

Interactive Table of Contents

Click on the title of the section you wish to view. Document will appear with a “bookmarks” column on

the left side. Use the “Table of Contents” bookmark to navigate back to this page.

______________________________________________________________________________________

Section Title Page Number

I Title Page, Contents, and Forward I-VI

1 Chapters I-IV 1-18
§ 1508.110 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system? ( a ) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with responsible persons.
( b ) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not presently responsible.
( c ) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.
China Public Security Technology, Inc. - Exhibit 10.4 - Prepared By TNT
Filings Inc.





  



NOTICE OF TERMINATION 


August 1, 2007 

To:  Shenzhen
iASPEC Software Engineering Company Limited 

c/o Irish Mag, Inc. 

Unit D, Block 2 

Tian An Cyber Park 

Chengongmiao 

Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518040 

People's Republic of China 

Cc:   Mr.
Jiang Huai Lin 

Mr. Jinzhu Cai 

Re:   
Notice of Termination of Amended and Restated Business Turnkey Agreement 


Gentlemen: 

We refer to the
Management Service Agreement ("MSA"),
effective as of July 1, 2007, among Public Security Technology (PRC) Co. Ltd.,
formerly Bo Hai Wen Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited ("PST"),
Shenzhen iASPEC Software Engineering Company Limited ("iASPEC"), Mr.
Jiang Huai Lin ("Mr. Lin") and Mr. Jinzhu Cai ("Mr. Cai", and
together with Mr. Lin, the "iASPEC Shareholders"), pursuant to which the
parties have agreed to replace, as of July 1, 2007, that certain Amended and Restated Business
Turnkey Agreement (the "Turnkey
Agreement"), dated as of January 31, 2007, among PST, iASPEC and the iASPEC
Shareholders, the effective date of the MSA. 

As you know, 
Section 7 of the Turnkey Agreement provides that the Turnkey Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect until June 22, 2021, and may only be terminated
early in the sole discretion of PST, by the delivery of a notice of such
termination to iASPEC. Therefore, in accordance with Section 7 of the
Turnkey Agreement, PST hereby gives notice to iASPEC and the iASPEC Shareholders
that the Turnkey Agreement is terminated, effective as of July 1, 2007 (the "Termination
Date"). 

As of the Termination
Date, the Turnkey Agreement will be deemed in all instances and for all purposes
to be fully and finally surrendered and terminated, and none of the parties
thereto will have any further rights or obligations thereunder; provided,
however, that the rights, liabilities and obligations of the parties arising
under the Turnkey Agreement prior to the Termination Date, including, but not
limited to the obligation of iASPEC and PST to make payments under the Turnkey
Agreement, will survive after the Termination Date to the extent provided for in
the MSA. 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]




If the foregoing
provisions correctly state our understanding with respect to the above matters,
please indicate your agreement by signing two copies of this letter in the space
provided below and returning one of the copies to us. 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	PUBLIC SECURITY
    TECHNOLOGY (PRC) CO. LTD.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Jiang Huai Lin                     
    
	 	       
    Jiang Huai Lin
	 	      
    Director



Acknowledged this 1st  day of August, 2007: 

iASPEC: 

SHENZHEN iASPEC SOFTWARE 

ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED 

By: /s/ Jiang Huai Lin                    


       Jiang Huai Lin


       President



iASPEC SHAREHOLDERS: 


By: /s/ Jiang Huai Lin                    


       Jiang Huai Lin

By: /s/ Jin
Zhu Cai                           
 

       Jin Zhu Cai
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Headley. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Earthan Keitt. (C) The People of the State of New York v. Theodore Jardine.

[In each action] Enlargement of time granted. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.