alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 215.3 Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a system of records. ( a ) Requests for notification of access to or amendment of Agency records contained in a system of records pertaining to an individual may be made in person or by mail as follows: For the International Development Cooperation Agency-Assistant Director for Administration, International Development Cooperation Agency, Room 4889 New State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20523 Attention: Privacy Liaison Officer. For the Agency for International Development-Privacy Liaison Officer, Agency for International Development, Room 4889 New State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20523.
( b ) Such request should include information necessary to identify the record, e.g., the individual's full name, date of birth, place of birth, present mailing address, or system of record identification name and number, if known, and, to facilitate the retrieval of records contained in those systems of records which are retrieved by social security numbers, the social security number of the individual to whom the record pertains.
( c ) With respect to a system of records which may be maintained by the Agency in offices outside the United States, an individual may inquire whether he or she is the subject of an Agency record or may request access to or amendment of such records by appearing in person or by writing to the Privacy Liaison Officer, Agency for International Development, at the overseas missions.
( d ) The Assistant Director for Administration for requests to I.D.C.A. or the appropriate Privacy Liaison Officer for request to A.I.D., or their designees shall, within ten (10) working days of receipt of the request, furnish in writing to the requesting individual notice of the existence or nonexistence of any records described in the request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imperial  Petroleum  Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  I, Alan B.  Springer,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
Company, hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.      The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Alan B. Springer                          May 16, 2006
   ---------------------------------------
     Alan B. Springer
     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       28
#### § 128.10 Disposition of proceedings.

Where the evidence is not sufficient to support the charges, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls or the Administrative Law Judge will dismiss the charges. Where the Administrative Law Judge finds that a violation has been committed, the Administrative Law Judge's recommendation shall be advisory only. The Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs will review the record, consider the report of the Administrative Law Judge, and make an appropriate disposition of the case. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls may issue an order debarring the respondent from participating in the export of defense articles or technical data or the furnishing of defense services as provided in § 127.7 of this subchapter, impose a civil penalty as provided in § 127.10 of this subchapter, or take such action as the Administrative Law Judge may recommend. Any debarment order will be effective for the period of time specified therein and may contain such additional terms and conditions as are deemed appropriate. A copy of the order together with a copy of the Administrative Law Judge's report will be served upon the respondent.

[79 FR 8089, Feb. 11, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           26172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    66000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                113604
<PP&E>                                          300584
<DEPRECIATION>                                   71838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12308683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1605559
<BONDS>                                         171840
<COMMON>                                         26838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12308683
<SALES>                                          31944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31944
<CGS>                                           182166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   182166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                149261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (310514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (310514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (310514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
§ 120.52 Retransfer. ( a ) *Retransfer,* except as set forth in § 120.54 or § 126.16 or § 126.17 of this subchapter, means: ( 1 ) A change in end-use or end-user, or a temporary transfer to a third party, of a defense article within the same foreign country; or
( 2 ) A release of technical data to a foreign person who is a citizen or permanent resident of the country where the release or transfer takes place.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 173.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, ( a ) *Program material* shall mean information about the United States, its people and policies, intended for foreign audiences abroad, that the Department prepares or assists in preparing using public diplomacy funds and disseminates to foreign audiences outside of the United States pursuant to the Smith-Mundt Act and Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (22 U.S.C. 1461-1a), as amended. Program Material includes, but is not limited to, electronic journals, pamphlets, books, maps, posters, videos, presentations, photos, games, curricula and other teaching materials, and certain social media and web-based interactive technology content produced in Washington, DC, as well as such materials and content produced at U.S. embassies abroad.
( b ) *Request* shall mean any attempt to access the Department's Program Material, including through the Department's public Web sites and third-party platforms, or through a direct inquiry to a Department official in connection with a speech or other engagement.
( c ) *Requester* shall mean any private person or entity that requests that the Department make Program Material available within the United States.
#### United Oil Mfg. Company, Respondent, v. Sam Siegel et al., Doing Business as Eastern Tire Co., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motion by defendants for an examination of books and records relative to transportation costs incurred by plaintiff.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §285e. Purpose of Institute

The general purpose of the National Institute on Aging (hereafter in this subpart referred to as the "Institute") is the conduct and support of biomedical, social, and behavioral research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to the aging process and the diseases and other special problems and needs of the aged.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §443, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 854.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study of Malnutrition in Elderly

Pub. L. 103–43, title XIX, §1902, June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 201, directed Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through National Institute on Aging, to conduct a 3-year study on health benefits and cost-effectiveness of nutrition screening and intervention activities of the elderly, and a 3-year study to determine extent of malnutrition in elderly individuals in hospitals and long-term care facilities and in elderly individuals who are living independently, provided for creation of advisory panel to oversee studies, provided for submission to Congress of reports containing findings of such studies, and provided for termination of advisory panel 3 years after June 10, 1993.

#### Study of Personnel for Health Needs of Elderly

Section 8 of Pub. L. 99–158 directed Secretary to conduct a study on the adequacy and availability of personnel to meet the current and projected health needs (including needs for home and community-based care) of elderly Americans through the year 2020, and report the results of the study, with recommendations, to Congress by Mar. 1, 1987.
§ 270.8b-21 Information unknown or not available. Information required need be given only insofar as it is known or reasonably available to the registrant. If any required information is unknown and not reasonably available to the registrant, either because the obtaining thereof would involve unreasonable effort or expense, or because it rests peculiarly within the knowledge of another person not affiliated with the registrant, the information may be omitted subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The registrant shall give such information on the subject as it possesses or can acquire without unreasonable effort or expense, together with the sources thereof.
( b ) The registrant shall include a statement either showing that unreasonable effort or expense would be involved or indicating the absence of any affiliation with the person within whose knowledge the information rests and stating the result of a request made to such person for the information.
[18 FR 8576, Dec. 19, 1953]
§ 1101.5 Security, confidentiality and protection of records. ( a ) The Act requires that records subject to the Act be maintained with appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained.
( b ) When maintained in manual form (typed, printed, handwritten, etc.) records shall be maintained, at a minimum, subject to the following safeguards, or safeguards affording comparable protection: ( 1 ) Areas in which the records are maintained or regularly used shall be posted with an appropriate warning stating that access to the records is limited to authorized persons. The warning shall also summarize the requirements of § 1101.3 and state that the Act contains a criminal penalty for the unauthorized dislosure of records to which it applies.
( 2 ) During working hours: ( i ) The area in which the records are maintained or regularly used shall be occupied by authorized personnel or
( ii ) access to the records shall be restricted by their storage in locked metal file cabinets or a locked room.
( 3 ) During non-working hours, access to the records shall be restricted by their storage in locked metal file cabinets or a locked room.
( 4 ) Where a locked room is the method of security provided for a system, that security shall be supplemented by: ( i ) Providing lockable file cabinets or containers for the records or
( ii ) changing the lock or locks for the room so that they may not be opened with a master key. For purposes of this paragraph, a master key is a key which may be used to open rooms other than the room containing records subject to the Act, unless those rooms are utilized by officials or employees authorized to have access to the records subject to the Act.
( 5 ) Personnel handling personal information during routine use will ensure that the information is properly controlled to prevent unintentional or unauthorized disclosure. Such information will be used, held, or stored only where facilities or conditions are adequate to prevent unauthorized or unintentional disclosure.
( c ) When the records subject to the Act are maintained in computerized form, safeguards shall be utilized based on those recommended in the National Bureau of Standard's booklet “Computer Security Guidelines for Implementing the Privacy Act of 1974” (May 30, 1975), and any supplements thereto, which are adequate and appropriate to assuring the integrity of the records.
#### § 1502.6 Records of other departments and agencies.

Responsive records located by the Foundation which have been originated by, or are primarily the concerns of, another U.S. department or agency will be forwarded to the particular department or agency involved, and the requestor so notified. In response to requests for records or publications published by the Government Printing Office or other government printing activity, the Foundation will refer the petitioner to the appropriate sales office and refund any fee payments which accompanied the request.
#### §§ 75.8-75.9 [Reserved]
January 7, 2016

From: Martin Yeager 1636 Cook Street Denver CO 80206 mvyeager@msn.com DBA reStu d ioWorks For: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act

Please accept this document as a Petition for exemption/rulemaking regarding unmanned aircraft. As owner of reStudioWorks, this request is for operation of a Small Unmanned Ai rcraft System (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct aerial photography for the commercial video industry. I have read the requirements as specified under Section 333 and ask for an exemption for flying low altitude, small drone equipped cameras in permissible ven ues and to keep the unmanned aircraft in sight and control of the operator at all times. The equipment follows all requirements in terms of size, weight and operations as described in the FAA regulations and used solely to enhance photographic vantage poi nts conducted well below and outside of controlled airspaces. Equipment has not been or will be altered or modified in any way insuring compliance with the manufacturer specifications and intended use and FAA guidelines. All aircraft will be operated in accordance with limitations to airspace, line of sight and will have established controlled access at all times. Approval of this exemption would enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “ ...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act I hereby apply for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs. With appreciation, Martin V Yeager mvyeager@msn.com
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance 
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80 Attachment #2

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the 

New Chemical Substance – General Description
§ 1508.880 What factors may influence the debarring official during reconsideration? The debarring official may reduce or terminate your debarment based on— ( a ) Newly discovered material evidence;
( b ) A reversal of the conviction or civil judgment upon which your debarment was based;
( c ) A bona fide change in ownership or management;
( d ) Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or
( e ) Other reasons the debarring official finds appropriate.
Form of specimen certificate



 Exhibit 4.6 
  

SPECIMEN 
 ASAT HOLDINGS LIMITED 
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands) 
  

			
	 Number
	 	Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares
	 P-xxx
	 	-xxx-

  
 US$30,000,000 Share
Capital divided into 
 2,999,000,000 Ordinary Shares of US$0.0l par value each and 
 1,000,000 Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares of US$0.01 par value each 
  
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT -------------------------------------------- xxxxx ---------------------------------------------  is the
registered holder of -------------------------------------------- xxx --------------------------------------------  Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares in the above-named Company subject to the
memorandum and articles of association thereof. 
  
 EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on 
  

			
	 DIRECTOR
	 	                                      
                                        
   
		
	 DIRECTOR/SECRETARY
	 	                                      
                                        
   

  
  
 THIS SECURITY IS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER AS SET FORTH IN A SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT DATED AS OF OCTOBER 11, 2001, A COPY OF WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED UPON
REQUEST FROM ASAT HOLDINGS LIMITED. NO SUCH TRANSFER SHALL BE EFFECTIVE UNLESS AND UNTIL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AFORESAID SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH IN FULL.
#### Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Niagara, Wheatfield, Lewiston and Cambria, Respondent-Appellant, v Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Association et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Kronenberg, J., and the following memorandum: We only add that the fact that a contract does not specifically authorize monetary damages will not prohibit the arbitrator from awarding them in a proper case. Only an express prohibition of damages, absent here, will have that effect *(Matter of Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers v Board of Educ.,*51 AD2d 762, 763). Special Term properly vacated the damages provision in the instant case on the ground that the damages awarded were punitive rather than compensatory. It is now settled that an arbitrator’s award which imposes punitive damages .violates "a public policy of such magnitude as to call for judicial intrusion” *(Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc.,*40 NY2d 354, 356), at least where, as here, the underlying contract neither expressly authorizes such damages nor provides a method of assessing them. The arbitrator’s acknowledgment that the grievant might not have received the appointment even if his rights had been safeguarded is tantamount to a finding that he might not have suffered any actual damages. Thus the conclusion seems inescapable that the damages were not intended as compensation for lost earnings or any other actual loss, but rather as a penalty for a claimed "flagrant” violation of the grievant’s contractual rights. We concur with the conclusion that the damages awarded were punitive. (Appeals from order of Niagara Supreme Court—vacate arbitrator’s award.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Denman, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORI GRAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL

RECREATIONAL AREA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-08-0722 EDL (EMC)

ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE

CALL RE STATUS OF SETTLEMENT

DISCUSSIONS

A conference call is scheduled for August 2, 2010, at 1:00 p.m. (Pacific time) before

Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen.

The Court will conduct individual (and not joint) conference calls with each party’s counsel,

starting at 1:00 p.m. Counsel is instructed to provide the names and contact information of counsel

who will participate in the conference call; the list should be faxed to chambers fax # 415/522-4200

by 10:00 a.m. (Pacific time), Monday, August 2, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2010 ________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00722-EDL Document 55 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 201.160 Time computation. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time prescribed in or allowed by these Rules of Practice or by order of the Commission, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal legal holiday (as defined in § 201.104), in which event the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal legal holiday. Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be excluded from the computation when the period of time prescribed or allowed is seven days or less, not including any additional time allowed for service by mail in paragraph (b) of this section. If on the day a filing is to be made, weather or other conditions have caused the Secretary's office or other designated filing location to close, the filing deadline shall be extended to the end of the next day that is neither a Saturday, a Sunday, nor a Federal legal holiday.
( b ) *Additional time for service by mail.* If service is made by mail, three days shall be added to the prescribed period for response unless an order of the Commission or the hearing officer specifies a date certain for filing. In the event that an order of the Commission or the hearing officer specifies a date certain for filing, no time shall be added for service by mail.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13177, Mar. 19, 2004]