alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300gg–114. Maintenance of price comparison tool

A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall offer price comparison guidance by telephone and make available on the Internet website of the plan or issuer a price comparison tool that (to the extent practicable) allows an individual enrolled under such plan or coverage, with respect to such plan year, such geographic region, and participating providers with respect to such plan or coverage, to compare the amount of cost-sharing that the individual would be responsible for paying under such plan or coverage with respect to the furnishing of a specific item or service by any such provider.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2799A–4, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §114(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2874.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2022, see section 114(d) of div. BB of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 9819 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
### §2214. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–439, title I, §101(b), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5568

Section, Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6101, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–298; Pub. L. 102–486, title XXIX, §2903(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3125; Pub. L. 103–66, title VII, §7001, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 401; Pub. L. 105–245, title V, §505, Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1856; Pub. L. 106–60, title VI, §604, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 106–377, §1(a)(2) [title VIII], Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A–86; Pub. L. 109–58, title VI, §637(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 791; Pub. L. 109–103, title IV, Nov. 19, 2005, 119 Stat. 2283; Pub. L. 115–439, title I, §101(a), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5567, related to NRC user fees and annual charges. See section 2215 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 115–439, title I, §101(b), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5568, provided that: "Effective October 1, 2020, section 6101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 2214) is repealed."
§ 191.33 Administration of benefits. ( a ) Any person desiring benefits under this part shall apply in writing to the Assistant Secretary of State for Administration, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The application shall specify the benefits desired and the basis of eligibility for those benefits. The Secretary of State shall make determinations of eligibility for benefits under this part, and shall forward approved applications to the Veterans Administration and advise the applicant of the name and address of the office in the Veterans Administration that will counsel the eligible persons on how to obtain the benefits that have been approved. Persons whose applications are disapproved shall be advised of the reasons for the disapproval.
( b ) The Veterans Administration shall provide the same level and kind of assistance, including payments (by advancement or reimbursement) for authorized expenses up to the same maximum amounts, to spouses and children of hostages, and to Principals following their release from captivity as it does to eligible spouses and children of veterans and to eligible veterans, respectively, under chapters 35 and 36 of title 38, United States Code. The Veterans Administration shall, following consultation with the Secretary of State and under procedures it has established to administer section 1724 of title 38, United States Code, discontinue assistance for any individual whose conduct or progress is unsatisfactory under standards consistent with those established pursuant to such section 1724.
( c ) An Advisory Board shall be established to advise on eligibility for benefits under paragraphs (c) and (d) of §§ 191.31 and 191.32. The Board shall be composed of the Assistant Secretary of State for Administration as Chairperson, the Director of the Office of Medical Services of the Department of State, the Executive Director of the regional bureau of the Department of State in whose region the relevant hostile action occurred, the Director of Personnel or other designee of the applicable employing agency, and a representative of the Veterans Administration designated by the Administrator.
( d ) If an application is received from a spouse or child for extended training under § 191.31(c), the Secretary of Administration shall determine with the advice of the Advisory Board whether the Principal, following release from captivity, is incapacitated by the hostage experience to the extent that ( 1 ) he or she has not returned to full-time active duty and is unlikely to be able to resume the normal duties of his or her position or career, or
( 2 ) in the event of a separation from Government service, a comparable position or career, for at least six months from the date the Principal is released from captivity. If the Secretary makes such a determination, he or she may approve, within the limits of § 191.34, an application under § 191.31(c) for up to one year of education or training. If the Principal remains incapacitated, the Secretary may approve additional training or education up to the maximum authorized under § 191.34.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

LIGHTBURN AND ASSOCIATES,

INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

No. 97-1058

v.

RAPTOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellant.

LIGHTBURN AND ASSOCIATES,

INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

No. 97-1448

v.

RAPTOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

LIGHTBURN AND ASSOCIATES,

INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

No. 97-1450

v.

RAPTOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-576-WMN)

Argued: October 28, 1997

Decided: December 17, 1997
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge,

and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Robert Todd Cronan, GOODWIN, PROCTOR & HOAR,

L.L.P., Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellant. Matthew Scott Sturtz,

MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Steven E. Skwara, GOODWIN, PROCTOR & HOAR,

L.L.P., Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellant. Jefferson V. Wright,

Joseph W. Hovermill, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Lightburn and Associates, Inc. ("LAI") sued Raptor Systems, Inc.

("Raptor"), alleging that Raptor hindered sales to two potential LAI

customers. Raptor counterclaimed, alleging that as a reseller of Raptor's products LAI failed diligently to promote sales and prejudiced

Raptor's own sales efforts. The district court granted Raptor summary

judgment on LAI's claims, refusing to attribute LAI's loss of potential business to Raptor. The court found that one sale never took place

because the prospective purchaser independently decided it did not

need the products LAI offered and that the other potential customer

refused to contract with LAI because it liked neither its products nor

its president. The district court also granted LAI summary judgment

 2
on Raptor's counterclaims, finding no breach of the obligation to promote Raptor products during the life of an exclusive reselling agreement, no continuing duty to promote after that agreement lapsed, and

no evidence that LAI's actions harmed Raptor's reputation with

potential customers.

Our review of the record, written and oral submissions of the parties, and the appropriate legal standards persuades us of the correctness of the district court's grant of summary judgment to Raptor. We

therefore affirm that judgment on the reasoning set forth in the district

court's memorandum opinion, Lightburn & Associates, Inc. v. Raptor

Systems, Inc., Civil No. WMN-95-576 (D. Md. December 9, 1996).

At oral argument, Raptor abandoned its counterclaims if it prevailed

on LAI's suit against it.

AFFIRMED

 3
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February
19, 2010


/s/ George
  MorrisGeorge
      MorrisChief
      Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
              EXTRACTED FROM THE AMMONIA HOLD, INC. FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
              AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
              SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,828
<SECURITIES>                                    58,160
<RECEIVABLES>                                  992,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,275
<INVENTORY>                                    771,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,980,412
<PP&E>                                       1,774,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,371,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,729,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,638
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,648,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,371,054
<SALES>                                        901,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               901,463
<CGS>                                          557,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  871,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,366,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,366,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,366,325)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.179)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.179)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 218
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 218 appear at 68 FR 51363, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 218.39 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When an agency withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the agency head may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient, any public or non-profit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) The agency head will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
#### Alain NDONG-NTOUTOUM, Petitioner v. Peter D. KEISLER, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60568

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 18, 2007.

Alexander E. Eisemann, Katonah, NY, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Linda Susan Wendtland, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Luis Enrique Perez, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thomp*272son, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, Sean Cenawood, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Respondent.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alain Ndong-Ntoutoum sought 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus relief from his order of removal; his habeas corpus petition was transferred to this court and converted into a petition for review. *See Rosales v. BICE,*426 F.3d 733, 735 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*546 U.S. 1106, 126 S.Ct. 1055, 163 L.Ed.2d 882 (2006). The sole issue before this court is whether Ndong-Ntoutoum may obtain relief pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Ndong-Ntoutoum has failed brief his ICCPR contention for appeal, see *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993), and, in any event, he may not obtain relief under the ICCPR. *See Martinez-Lopez v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 500, 502 (5th Cir.2006).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001020186
<NAME>                        CAPITAL BEVERAGE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,436,060
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  536,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                   40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    693,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,806,265
<PP&E>                                         69,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,059,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,777
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,000
<COMMON>                                       2,379
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,912,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,059,930
<SALES>                                        4,712,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,712,128
<CGS>                                          4,328,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,328,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             29,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (447,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (452,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of New York Regional Rail Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joel Marcus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Joel Marcus
   -----------------------
   Joel Marcus
   Chief Financial Officer

November 19, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carmine Stella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 19, 2007

                                   By: /s/Carmine Stella
                                          --------------
                                          Carmine Stella
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 1423.2 Informal proceedings. ( a ) The purposes and policies of the Foreign Service Labor-Management Relations Statute can best be achieved by the cooperative efforts of all persons covered by the program. To this end, it shall be the policy of the Board and the General Counsel to encourage all persons alleging unfair labor practices and persons against whom such allegations are made to meet and, in good faith, attempt to resolve such matters prior to the filing of unfair labor practice charges with the Board.
( b ) In furtherance of the policy referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, and noting the six (6) month period of limitation set forth in 22 U.S.C. 4116(d), it shall be the policy of the Board and the General Counsel to encourage the informal resolution of unfair labor practice allegations subsequent to the filing of a charge and prior to the issuance of a complaint by the Regional Director.