alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.41 Audit and inspection.

The borrower/grantee shall maintain records adequate to document the arrival and disposition in the cooperating country of all commodities financed by USAID, and to identify the importer (or the first purchaser or transferee if the commodity is imported by the borrower/grantee) for a period of 3 years following the date of payment or reimbursement by USAID or for such other period as USAID and the borrower/grantee agree. In addition, the borrower/grantee or the importer shall, to the extent either exercises control or custody over the commodities, permit USAID or any of its authorized representatives at all reasonable times during the 3-year or other agreed period to inspect the commodities at any point, including the point of use, and to inspect all records and documents pertaining to such commodities.
#### BROOKLYN UNION ELEVATED R. CO. et al., Appellants, v. MITCHELL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Petition of the Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company and- the Brooklyn Heights Railroad .Company against Edward Mitchell and Grosvenor S. Hubbard, as executors of Benjamin D. Silliman, deceased, relative to acquiring title to real estate on Myrtle avenue, etc. Parcel No. la, premises No. 32 Myrtle avenue.

PER CURIAM.

Final order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

HOOKER, J., not voting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1510315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1544939
<PP&E>                                          244329
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (71091)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1718177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1917913
<BONDS>                                         479665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      20318
<COMMON>                                        221280
<OTHER-SE>                                    (920999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1718177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                544731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    544731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 217
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 217.44 Academic adjustments. ( a ) *Academic requirements.* A recipient to which this subpart applies shall make such modifications to its academic requirements as are necessary to ensure that such requirements do not discriminate or have the effect of discriminating, on the basis of handicap, against a qualified handicapped applicant or student. Academic requirements that the recipient can demonstrate are essential to the instruction being pursued by such student or to any directly related licensing requirement will not be regarded as discriminatory within the meaning of this section. Modifications may include changes in the length of time permitted for the completion of degree requirements, substitution of specific courses required for the completion of degree requirements, and adaptation of the manner in which specific courses are conducted.
( b ) *Other rules.* A recipient to which this subpart applies may not impose upon handicapped students other rules, such as the prohibition of tape recorders in classrooms or of dog guides in campus buildings, that have the effect of limiting the participation of handicapped students in the recipient's education program or activity.
( c ) *Course examinations.* In its course examinations or other procedures for evaluating students' academic achievement, a recipient to which this subpart applies shall provide such methods for evaluating the achievement of students who have a handicap that impairs sensory, manual, or speaking skills as will best ensure that the results of the evaluation represents the student's achievement in the course, rather than reflecting the student's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills (except where such skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).
( d ) *Auxiliary aids.* ( 1 ) A recipient to which this subpart applies shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that no handicapped student is denied the benefits of, excluded from participation in, or otherwise subjected to discrimination because of the absence of educational auxiliary aids for students with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills.
( 2 ) Auxiliary aids may include taped texts, interpreters or other effective methods of making orally delivered materials available to students with hearing impairments, readers in libraries for students with visual impairments, classroom equipment adapted for use by students with manual impairments, and other similar services and actions. Recipients need not provide attendants, individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices or services of a personal nature.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3275

JESSIE L. FLETCHER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT0752070493-I-1.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The Department of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition for a 5-day

extension of time, until June 15, 2009, to file its brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JUN 2 9 2009	/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Daniel A. Perez, Esq.

David A. Harrington, Esq.

s20

JAL*

us.um- ..eD OE APPEALS

THE FEDERAL CIRCUITFOR

JUN 2 9 2009

JAN ii0korbui

CLERK
#### § 37.1303 Liquidity of financial resources.

The financial resources allocated by the swap execution facility to meet the ongoing requirements of § 37.1301 shall include unencumbered, liquid financial assets (*i.e.,* cash and/or highly liquid securities) equal to at least the greater of three months of projected operating costs, as calculated on a rolling basis, or the projected costs needed to wind down the swap execution facility's operations, in each case as determined under § 37.1304. If a swap execution facility lacks sufficient unencumbered, liquid financial assets to satisfy its obligations under this section, the swap execution facility may satisfy this requirement by obtaining a committed line of credit or similar facility in an amount at least equal to such deficiency.
###### Editorial Note on Part 217

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 217.24-217.40 [Reserved]
#### § 138.410 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
### §235. Administration of grants in multigrant projects; promulgation of regulations

For the purpose of facilitating the administration of, and expediting the carrying out of the purposes of, the programs established by subchapters V, VI, and VII,1 and sections 242b, 246(a), 246(b), 246(c), 246(d),1 and 246(e) 1 of this title in situations in which grants are sought or made under two or more of such programs with respect to a single project, the Secretary is authorized to promulgate regulations—

(1) under which the administrative functions under such programs with respect to such project will be performed by a single administrative unit which is the administrative unit charged with the administration of any of such programs or is the administrative unit charged with the supervision of two or more of such programs;

(2) designed to reduce the number of applications, reports, and other materials required under such programs to be submitted with respect to such project, and otherwise to simplify, consolidate, and make uniform (to the extent feasible), the data and information required to be contained in such applications, reports, and other materials; and

(3) under which inconsistent or duplicative requirements imposed by such programs will be revised and made uniform with respect to such project;

except that nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the Secretary to waive or suspend, with respect to any such project, any requirement with respect to any of such programs if such requirement is imposed by law or by any regulation required by law.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §226, formerly title III, §310A, as added Pub. L. 91–515, title II, §270, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1306; amended Pub. L. 92–157, title II, §201, Nov. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 461; renumbered §226, Pub. L. 93–353, title I, §102(e), July 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 362.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapters V and VI, referred to in text, are classified to sections 292 et seq. and 296 et seq., respectively, of this title.

Subchapter VII, referred to in text, which was classified to section 299 et seq. of this title, was repealed by Pub. L. 99–117, §12(d), Oct. 7, 1985, 99 Stat. 495.

Section 246(d) of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §902(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 559.

Section 246(e) of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–63, title V, §501(b), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 346.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 242i of this title.

#### Amendments

1971—Pub. L. 92–157 provided for administration of programs established under subchapters V and VI of this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
              <LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
              EXTRACTED FROM THE AMMONIA HOLD, INC. FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
              AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
              SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                          <C>                      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,200,163          
<SECURITIES>                                   913,740
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,776
<INVENTORY>                                    688,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,274,112          
<PP&E>                                       1,745,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,167,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,967
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,096,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,167,800
<SALES>                                        481,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               630,330
<CGS>                                          281,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  304,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,706
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .005
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993 ANSI Accredited Standards Committee ``C18''

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ANSI Accredited Standards 
Committee ``C18'' (``C18 Committee''), by its Secretariat, National 
Electrical Manufacturers Association (``NEMA''), has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI 
Accredited Standards Committee ``C18'', Rosslyn, VA. The nature and 
scope of C18 Committee's standards development activities are: related 
to dry cells and batteries. Currently, C18 Committee maintains 11 
standards relating to general specifications and safety for portable 
lithium and portable non-lithium batteries as well as portable 
rechargeable batteries. The standards developed by C18 Committee are 
published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27543 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 1429.14 Witness Fees. ( a ) Witnesses (whether appearing voluntarily, or under a subpoena) shall be paid the fee and mileage allowances which are paid subpoenaed witnesses in the courts of the United States: *Provided,* That any witness who is employed by the Federal Government shall not be entitled to receive witness fees in addition to compensation received pursuant to § 1429.13.
( b ) Witness fees and mileage allowances shall be paid by the party at whose instance the witnesses appear, except when the witness receives compensation pursuant to (the preceding section).
Searched for **https://www.performance.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.performance.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
March 4, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0018 – RENEWAL OF 

FULL-POWER OPERATING LICENSE FOR CALLAWAY PLANT, 

UNIT 1 

The Commission has approved staff’s recommendation and authorizes the Director of the Office 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to renew the operating license for Callaway upon making the

appropriate findings on safety and environmental matters. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### Emilie Dams, as Administratrix, etc., of Ludwig Dams, Deceased, Respondent, v. Director General of Railroads, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 June 13, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16067

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 04-00041-CR-5-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEMETRIUS LAMAR LOVE,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(June 13, 2005)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher N. Patterson, appointed counsel for Demetrius Lamar Love, in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
2

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record

reveals no issues of arguablemerit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Love’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4339 

To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to include the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the employment services provided under that 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Ms. NORTON) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to include the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the employment services provided under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE 

4 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS IN THE WAG5 NER-PEYSER ACT. 

6 The Wagner-Peyser Act is amended— 

7 (1) in section 2(5) (29 U.S.C. 49a(5)), by in8 serting ‘‘the Commonwealth of the Northern Mar9 iana Islands,’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4339 IH

1 (2) in section 5(b)(1) (29 U.S.C. 49d(b)(1)), by 

2 inserting ‘‘and the Commonwealth of the Northern 

3 Mariana Islands’’ after ‘‘Guam’’; and 

4 (3) in section 6(a) (29 U.S.C. 49e(a))— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘allot to Guam’’ and in6 serting ‘‘allot to— 

7 ‘‘(1) Guam’’; 

8 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

9 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(2) the Commonwealth of the Northern Mar12 iana Islands an amount which, in relation to the 

13 total amount available for the fiscal year, is equal to 

14 the allotment percentage that Guam received of 

15 amounts available under this Act in fiscal year 

16 1983.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §19071. Microgravity utilization policy

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that space technology and the utilization of the microgravity environment for science, engineering, and technology development is critical to long-term competitiveness with near-peer competitors, including China.

#### (b) Policy

To the extent appropriate during an award period, the Foundation shall facilitate access by recipients of Foundation awards to the microgravity environment, including in private sector platforms, for the development of science, engineering, and technology relevant to the award.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 180 days after August 9, 2022, the Director shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Foundation's plan for facilitating awardee access to the microgravity environment.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10364, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1569.)
#### Pamela Uebelacker et al., Respondents, v Joanne Lampel, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 5, 1976, which granted plaintiffs-respondents’ motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendant as being contrary to the weight of the evidence, and directed that a new trial be held. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, upon the memorandum of the Trial Justice. In addition, we would point out that there were errors in the charge to the jury with respect to skidding. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 1506.29 Is there a time limit for initiating collection by salary offset?

USADF will not initiate salary offset to collect a debt more than 1 year after the Government's right to collect the debt first accrued, unless facts material to the right to collect the debt were not known and could not have been known through the exercise of reasonable care by the Government official responsible for discovering and collecting such debt.
#### Sollie Rogoff, Appellant, v. Herman Hilgerman, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdict of no cause of action was against the weight of the evidence. The proof established that the defendant had violated subdivision (c) of section 1160 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by making a left turn too sharply and proceeding northerly beyond the intersection before he had reached the lane “lawfully available to traffic moving in such direction”. There was no basis for finding contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The verdict of no cause of action cannot be justified upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove damage as a result of the accident. While there was a controversy as to the plaintiff’s loss of earnings, there was undisputed medical proof that the plaintiff had suffered a back injury causing pain and there was uncontradicted proof that the doctor had rendered medical services of the reasonable value of $250 in the treatment of the injury. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing the complaint on a verdict of no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action. The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and to set aside the verdict.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
(December 6, 1960)

#### Eugene H. Alnwick, Respondent, v. Charles Kreisler Auto Rental Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for a stay pending appeal granted, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the January Term, commencing January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before December 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.