# GE Energy Bruce Randall Emissions Testing Service Director ISO 9001 Accredited Quality Sys1em



### PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS STUDY

PerformedAt The 

### Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. M.R. Young Station Unit 2 Center, NO

Emission Facility Contact Person 

### Andrew Freidt Permitting and Compliance Engineer

Test Dates**May6~,** 

### 2008

Report No, 

### GE Energy Management Services, Inc. Report M22A0427A
Report Submittal Date 

### May 20,2008

GE Energy Management Services, Inc, 1301 Corporate Center Drive-Suite 1

## n Eagen, MN 55121 USA T (651) 681>-0700 F (651) 686-4434

# GE Energy

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATIONS Of TEST REPORTS i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 1 3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 3 3.1 Description of Sampling Location 3 3.2 Fiterable PM Determination by USEPA Method 17 3 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES 4 5.0 TEST RESULTS SUMMARy 5

APPENDIX Project Participants 12 Sample Train Diagrams 13 Sample Analysis Data 14 Calculation Nomenclature and Formulas 20 Test Data and Results 24 Field Data Sheets 68 Calibration Data 112 Test Plan 124

# .. 

# GE Energy

CERTIFICATIONS OF TEST REPORTS M22A0427A

Bruce Randall Printed Name 

### or PelSOll**'L-~O** 

### - 

# o-e:. Date TItle 1. Certillcatlon of sampling procedures by the team leader of the personne' conducting the sampling procedures: "I certify that the sampling procedures were performed in accordance with the approved test plan and thai the data presented in this test report are. to the best of my knowledge and belier, true. accurate, and complele. All**excep~** and explained below."

# Slgnat~ £..---> Emissions: TesUng Service Director



### 2. Certillcatlon of analytical proceduras by the person responsible for the laboratory analysis of field samples: "I cerlily that the analy/ical procedures were performed in accordance with the requirements or the lest melhods and thai the dala presented ror use in the test report were, to the best 

# or my knowledge and belier, true, accurate, and complete. All exceptions are listed and explained below."

Tille 11m Singer Printed NljlT!e 01 Person**~-~-(Jrr** Date

Bruce RandaN Printed Name 

### or PeISOIl 

### "'--20- 05 Date 3. Certification of test report by the senior staff person 

### at the testing company who is responsible for compiling and checklng the test report:

"' cerlily that this tesl report and all atlachmenls were prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system designed to assure that quall1led personnel properly gathered and evaluated the test information submitted. Based on my Inquiry 

# or the person or persons who performed sampling and analysis relating to the performance test, the Information submitted in this test report is. to the best or my knowledge and beller. true, accurate. and complete. All exceptions are listed and explained below."

# ~~
Title Signature: Emls610ns Tesdng Service Director

C 2007, G6noral E1ectnc Company. All rights reserved. The contents of this document are the property of General EJecttfc Company. No part of this

_ may be reproduced or tronsmitted In My fonn or by any means. axeep; as pormitted in written license agreement with General Electric Company_ General Electric Company has made evety re.sonabI9 attempt to ensure the

# comp/I>/e""" 8Ild 8CCIJT8Cy ofthis document Tho GElogo Is e rvg/sIered Inldem8rlr of General E1eclrio Company.

# GE Energy

PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS STUDY 

### Performed At tHE Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. M.R. Young Station 

### Unit 2 Center, NO May 6-8, 2008

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

### Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. (Minnkota) has installed a continuous Particulate Matter (PM) monitor on the exhaust stack of Unit 2 at their M.R. Young Station in Center, ND. In order to be 

### certified for use by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), it is necessary to correlate the PM concentrations measured by the monitor to those measured by a USEPA Reference Method (RM). This report presents the results of the RM measurements conducted by GE Energy Management Services, Inc. on May 6 though May 8, 2008.

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 

### As required by USEPA Performance Specification 11, RM sampling was conducted over three PM concentration ranges, identified as "Low", 'Medium' and "High" in this document. The table below presents the number of RM sample runs performed at each concentration range:

PM Concentration Range Number of RM Sample Runs Perfonned Low 

### Seven' Medium Eight

High 

### Seven' 

### 1 - At both Low and Mid, one test run was performed at a single point located as close to the monitor probe tip as possible. These runs were for informational purposes only, not to develop the required correlation. The results of the 20 RM sample runs that were performed for correlation purposes are presented on the following page. It should be noted that those developing the correlation may elect not to use a number of these runs in the correlation. GE Energy Project M22A0427A 

### 1

# GE Energy

PM Concentration RM Pili Concentration Test Date Range sample Time (mgldscm)' (mgJwscm)' 

### 51612008 High 10:46-11:53 43.3 35.1 

### 5/612008 High 11:30-12:41 26.8 21.5 

### 51612008 High 12:37-13:43 25.9 20.8 

### 51612008 High 13:48-14:58 34.5 27.6 51612008 High 14:35-15:41 32.0 25.5 

### 5/612008 High 15:41-16:49 28.4 22.8 

### 5R12008 Low 08:20-09:38 8.9 7.2 

### 5R12oo8 

### Low 09:00-10:27 9.6 7.8 

### 5n12008 Low 10:13-11:33 10.2 8.2 

### 5n12008 Low 11 :25-12:45 8.7 6.9 

### 5nl2oo8 Low 12:32-13:50 8.8 7.1 

### 5n12008 Low 13:43-15:03 10.0 8.0 

### 5R12008 Low 14:30-15:48 15.6 12.5 

### 5n12008 Low 15:37-16:55 9.4 7.6 51812008 Mid 09:09-10:15 18.6 15.0 51812008 Mid 09:55-11:01 13.9 11.2 

### 51812008 Mid 11:08-12:14 13.4 10.8 

### 51812008 Mid 11:53-13:01 14.3 11.4 

### 51812008 Mid 13:00-14:06 23.4 18.7 

### 51812008 Mid 13:46-14:52 21.4 17.1


### 1 - milligrams per dry standard cubic meter 2 - milligrams per wet standard cubic meter

GE Enefyy Project M22A0427A 

### 2

# GE Energy

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES All testing, sampling, analytical, and calibration procedures used for this· test program were performed as described in the Title 40, 

### Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (40CFR60), Appendix A, Method 17 and the latest revisions thereof. Where applicable, the 

### Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III, Stationary Source Specific Methods, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 6001R-94/038c, September 1994 was used to supplement procedures.

3.1 Description of Sampling Location The sample location at Unit 2 was a vertical circular stack equipped with multiple sample ports. The ports used for this program were located 5.8 duct diameters upstream, and 12.8 duct diameters downstream from the nearest 

### flow disturbance. Sample point location was determined in accordance with USEPA Method 1. 3.2 Filterable PM Determination by USEPA Method 17 This method is applicable for the determination of PM emissions, where PM concentrations are known to be independent of temperature over the normal range of temperatures characteristic of emissions from a specific source category. Sample was drawn from the source through a button hook nozzle and an in-stack filter. The filter was followed in series by: a heated probe, an impinger train immersed in an ice bath, a pump and a dry test meter. Flue gas velocity pressures were measured with a calibrated S-type pitot tube and inclined manometer. All temperatures were measured using K-type thermocouples with calibrated digital temperature indicators. The number and location of sample points 

### was determined in accordance 

### with USEPA Method 1. Prior to sampling, the probe was heated to 248:!:25°F, and the entire sample system was checked for leaks. The nozzle and filter holder were inserted into the flue gas stream, and allowed to temperature-equilibrate prior to sampling. At the conclusion of sampling, the entire sample system was checked for leaks at a vacuum greater than or equal to the highest sample vacuum observed during the test run. All sample contact surfaces of the upstream of the filter train were rinsed and brushed with HPLC reagent-grade acetone. These washes were placed in sealed and marked containers for analysis. The filter was recovered to a Petri dish. All sample recovery was performed at the test site. Final sample analyses for "High" runs and preliminary analyses for "Low' runs were performed by on-site 

## ..

GE Energy Pmjed M22A04ZTA 

## 3

# GE Energy

by GE Energy personnel. Final analyses for "Low" and "Mid" runs were performed at the GE Energy laboratory in Eagan, MN.



### 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES 

### GE Energy recognizes the previously described reference methods to be very technique oriented and attempts to minimize all factors which can increase error by implementing its 

### Quality Assurance Program into every segment of its 

### testing activities. Dry test meters are calibrated according to methods described in the 

### Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III, Stationary Source Specific Methods, USEPA 600/R-94/038c. 

### September 1994, Method 5.

GE Energy Project M22A0427A 

### 4

# GE Energy

5.0 TEST RESULTS SUMMARY

Company: Plant: Unit: Minnkota MR Young Unit 2
Irest Run Number 

### High 1 High 2 High 3 pate 51612008 51612008 5/612008**~tart** Time 

### 10:46 11:30 12:37 lEnd TIme 

### 11:53 12:41 13:43

otal Sample TIme (Min): 

### 48.0 48.0 48.0 Average Duct Temp (OF): 

### 170.9 174.0 171.8 Averaqe Duct Vel 

### (ftlsec): 

### 63.39 63.15 63.87 Moisture Content (Bws): 

### 0.190 0.197 0.199 Wet MW (Ibllbmole-moie): 

### 28.07 27.99 27.97 Volume Flow Rate (ACFM): 

### 1867091 1859907 1881060 Volume Flow Rate (SCFM): 

### 1441982 1429448 1450663 Volume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 

### 1167942 1147405 1161348**~mple** Volume (dscf): 

### 26.397 26.787 26.280**~ample** Volume (dscm): 

### ·0.747 0.759 0.744**~ample** Volume (wscf): 

### 32.591 33.372 32.827 13ample Volume (wscm): 

### 0.923 0.945 0.930 I'M Collected (mg): 

### 32.4 20.3 19.3 PM Concentration:



### mQ/dscm: 

### 43.3 26.8 25.9 mglwscm: 

### 35.1 21.5 20.8 lsokinetic Variance 

### 100.9 98.4 101.0

GE Energy Project M22AD427A 

## 5

# GE Energy

Company: Plant: 

### Unit: Mlnnkota MR Young Unit 2
Irest Run Number 

### High 4 High 5 High 6 bate 51612008 5/612008 51612008 Start Time 

### 13:48 14:35 15:41 Endnme 

### 14:58 15:41 16:49

otal Sample nme (Min): 

### 48.0 48.0 48.0 Average Duet Temp ("F): 

### 176.3 174.1 176.9 Avera<le Duct Vel (ftlsec): 

### 63.18 64.53 62.83 Moisture Content (Bws): 

### 0.199 0.201 0.198**~et** MW (lbAbmole-mole): 

### 27.96 27.96 27.99**~olume** Flow Rate (ACFM): 

### 1860798 1900541 1850402**~olume** Flow Rate (SCFM): 

### 1424889 1460486 1415631**~olume** Flow Rate (DSCFM): 

### 1141872 1166316 1135739 Sample Volume (dscl): 

### 26.851 26.611 26.623 Sample Volume (dscm): 

### 0.760 0.754 0.754 Sample Volume (wscl): 

### 33.507 33.322 33.184 Sample Volume (wscm): 

### 0.949 0.944 0.940 PM Collected (mg): 

### 26.2 24.1 21.4 PM Concentration:

mg/dscm: 

### 34.5 32.0 28.4 mQ/Wscm: 

### 27.6 25.5 22.8 sokinetic Variance 

### 99.1 101.9 98.8

GE Energy Project M22A0427A 

## 6

# GE Energy

Company: Plant: Unit: Minnkota MR Young Unit2
!Test Run Number Low 1 Low 2 Low 3 Low 4 bate 5f7f2008 517f2008 51712008 517f2008 Start Time 

### 8:20 9:06 10:13 11:25 End Time 

### 9:38 10:27 11:33 12:45 Total Sample Time (Min): 

### 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Average Duct Temp ("F): 

### 172.5 175.4 174.3 178.0 Averaae Duct Vel 

### (tvsec): 63.74 62.57 63.94 62.23 Moisture Content (8ws): 

### 0.197 0.196 0.198 0.200 Wet MW (Ibllbmole-mole): 

### 28.00 28.02 28.00 27.95 lVolume Flow Rate (ACFM): 

### 1877243 1842919 1883297 1832897 lVolume Flow Rate (SCFM): 

### 1449468 1416305 1450130 1402899 lVolume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 

### 1163794 1139102 1162311 1122476 fSamDle Volume (dscl): 

### 32.907 33.677 33.077 33.445 Sample Volume (dscm): 

### 0.932 0.954 0.937 0.947 Sample Volume (wscf): 

### 40.985 41.873 41.268 41.801 SamDle Volume (wscm): 

### 1.161 1.186 1.169 1.184 PM Collected (mg): 

### 8.3 9.2 9.6 8.2 PM Concentration:

ma/dscm: 

### 8.9 9.6 10.2 8.7 mglwscm: 

### 7.2 7.8 8.2 6.9 sokinetic Variance 

### 101.0 99.7 101.6 100,5

GE Energy Project M22A0427A 

## 7

# GE Energy

Company: Minnkota Plant: MR Young 

### Unit: Unil2
!rest Run Number lowS low 6 low 7 lowS pate 5f7/2008 51712008 5/712008 51712008 Start Time 12:32 13:43 14:30 15:37 End Time 13:50 15:03 15:48 16:55

otal Sample Time (Min): 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Average Duct Temp (oF): 174.3 178.3 174.6 178.7 Average Duct Vel 1ft/sec): 64.06 64.20 64.01 64.56 Moisture Content (Bws): 0.196 0.198 0.201 0.196 lWet MW (Ibllbmole-mole): 28.02 27.98 27.95 28.00**~olume** Flow Rate (ACFM): 1886714 1890869 1885237 1901483 Wolume Flow Rate (SCFM): 1452570 1446516 1450730 1453876 Wolume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 1168424 1160169 1159785 1169549 Sample Volume {dscfJ: 32.790 34.197 32.763 34.545 Sample Volume (dscm): 0.929 0.968 0.928 0.978 Sample Volume 

### (wscfJ: 40.764 42.637 40.982 42.943 Sample Volume (wscm): 1.154 1.207 1.160 1.216 PM Collected 

### (mQ): 8.2 9.7 14.5 9.2 PM Concentration:



### mg/dscm: 8.8 10.0 15.6 9.4 mglwscm: 7.1 8.0 12.5 7.6 soldnetic Variance 100.2 99.4 100.9 99.6

GE Energy Projed M22A0427A 

## 8

# GE Energy

Company: Plant: Unit Minnkota MR Young Unit 2
trast Run Number Mid 1 Mid 

### 2 Mid 3 Date 

### 518/2008 5/812008 5/812008**~tartTjme** 

### 9:09 9:55 11:08 End Time 

### 10:15 11:01 12:14 "'olal Sample TIne (Min): 

### 48.0 48.0 48.0 Average Duct Temp ("F): 

### 172.3 174.8 173.3 Average Duct Vel (ft/sec): 

### 64.22 63.75 64.41 Moisture Content (Bws): 

### 0.196 0.196 0.197 Wet MW (Ibllbmole-mole): 

### 27.96 27.99 27.98**~olume** Flow Rate (ACFM): 

### 1891474 1877651 1897026**~olume** Flow Rate (SCFM): 

### 1459958 1443469 1461932 Wolume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 

### 1174468 1160950 1174304 Sample Volume (dscf): 

### 26.022 27.232 26.114 Sample Volume (dscm): 

### 0.737 ·0.771 0.739 Sample Volume (wscf): 

### 32.348 33.859 32.510 Sample Volume (wscm): 

### 0.916 0.959 0.921 PM Collected (mg): 

### 13.7 10.7 9.9 PM Concentration:

mg/dscfm: 

### 18.6 13.9 13.4 mglwscm: 

### 15.0 11.2 10.8 sokinetic Variance 

### 98.9 98.8 99.3

GE Energy Project M22A0427A 

## 9

# GE Energy

Company: Plant: Unit: Minnkota MR Young Unit 2
Irest Run Number Mid4 Mid 

### 5 Mld6 bate 

### 5/812008 5/812008 51812008 Start Time 

### 11:53 13:00 13:46 End TIme 

### 13:01 14:06 14:52

olal Sample TIme (Min): 

### 46.0 48.0 48.0**~verage** Duct Temp ('F): 

### 177.6 172.7 177.6**~veraQe** Duct Vel (ft/sec): 

### 64.50 84.71 65.41 Moisture Content (Bws): 

### 0.199 0.201 0.198 Wet MW (Ib/lbmole-mole): 

### 27.97 27.93 27.97

....olume Flow Rate (ACFM): 

### 1899822 1905961 1926626 Volume Flow Rate (SCFM): 

### 1454023 1470172 1474537 Volume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 

### 1165288 1174884 1183080 Sample Volume (dscf): 

### 27.487 26.292 27.933 Sample Volume (dscm): 

### 0.778 0.745 0.791 Isample Volume (wsct): 

### 34.297 32.900 34.814**~ample** Volume (wscITI): 

### 0.971 0.932 0.966 

### PM Collected (mg): 

### 11.1 17.4 16.9 PM Concentration:

mgldscfm: 

### 14.3 23.4 21.4 mglwscm: 

### 11.4 18.7 17.1 sokinetic Variance 

### 99.4 99.9 99.5

GE Energy ProjecI Wf22AD427A 

## 10

## APPENDIX



# 11

### M22A0427A Project Participants

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. Representative Agency Observer(s) 

### Jim Semerad, Ben Gress GE Energy Project Manager 

### Bruce Randall GE Energy Test Crew 

### Tim Singer, Alan Phillips, Mike Hoehn, Wayne Zoeteman, Neal Conroy

# GE Energy

Particulate Sampling Train Equipped With In-Stack Filter USEPA Method 17

Cheek Va

SIOCk

# i" 

# 1

lIII---impinger
III • III III III III III III

" III III III II III III II

II III III III III III III III

III III III III III III III III III III III III III III II II III III III II
100 mI water 

## • • • 

# · .. 

# · 

# ..

·.. • • •



## • • • • ••

• • • 

# · 

# ..

· . 

# . II III II II Empty 

# · . 

# . ·. 

# . 

# ·.. · 

# .. · 

# . .



# ·. . 

# ·. . • • • 

## • • •

• • 

## • II •••

Silica Gel 

## • • .,

Orifice 

# I

T By-Pass Valve
. oin Valve



# -- Go

....

Dwg-P



# 13 Ice Both 

# T Temperoture Sensor

### 201 A Sample Analysis 'Data Source: 

## L-\tJtT 2.

- 

## 1-\

.. b 1\ LOp.. \:) ProJoct Menage" 

# Be**~\"Qj(** Anelyet:

## tJ~ 

# \ EPA Metho



# J5l Method 

# I]

[J Method 201

... 

# o Mothod202 

## I - 

# 2:l <\. 

### C>LN-J"-. M, 

## 2.2 

# A0 '-Ir 

### G-

## 7 (\1\

# ,~ '"

# ~-r-..... 

# iPO"l..JJ-€/\.

Method 5I201A Analyale Required: Project: No. otTelit Runs: FSR.:

. Fnter Anal al. OatelTlme Final Not Ualeillme Datemme W

..... Semple FDter 

# T:: WelahtJBv W.loOl!Bv Wf;llaht

1.0. 1.0. Weht W ,VBv**5.ol,o~** 

### .' 

## '7 

## :.5'1> S.**<Ol,D~.t** 

### J'3>·.'-/C I 

## {I,f4S3

# ~,fJZ,1S 1i,,\1, 

## ..,1 

# &rJ.
- '2.\b**().\~ ~.**  

### 1'-1

# S-i 'Kft. ().\'i'>'1, I**!'J~c..** I 

### S',.n.olS I 

### 7: 

### "\"1-**b.iJ1~1** 

# 1:-:'-{5 I

## d./~ d. 

### t>1f3 I 

# "2- -').\1 

### O·i1T1 

## O. I?<"<'..' f.lrt.. 

### 0.\;''59, 

## l,..lqL- I ;S.J1.0'1..' 7:'-4'" 

### 5.°7.01> I 

## 13'. '-\8 

# ,**O,,~ ~,(/111**  

# ¥ 43 ¥ 

# -;hr, O· 

## \08 

# 7 0, I Z

## Sl1l 1**~~'-** 

### D,1'2.S'iI I 

## tJf'c.. I .



### . I I I I I I Method 51201 A • Rinse Anal sis**D8:~mo** Final - -Net O.tel11me OelelTlme Samplo Beaker 

# I Tare 

# I Volume Start Date**W~l!Bv** W.I VBv W.1ahl Weight



### 'D. 

# I 1.0. Weight ImLl**W~!ll'tI8v** 

## 2-21 .;: .e1 ,o</,I 

# II '5S S.ol,O'b 

## 'l1l5S I 

## '14,1(,11 

# ().ocB!**~\'j~** -All 

# Ie", I 7 1

# --Lt';b:)r<®>**l'1,I~I,,\** I 

### 1'i. 

## '(.11 1

### ~Pc.. 

## iZ
- 

# 21 '" ;.°7. 0,& 1 

## 1/;05**S,07.~'** 

## q!';JS I I 

## I 14/>/1 I 6. 

### t>C12f7 

# "2.1 

# cc.. I**7L\·()~1®** 1'\.05,\\ 1

### !'J~c.. I I 

# h'-\.50'1-"**bl{-22.~** 5".01.06 1 /0'.<-1:) 

# I ':>,0).09> I 

### 16: 

### 'I'::> 

# I I 

# lit-l.<j1?.)--' I o..o<Ji?/J

## .Jd:~IC.D 

# ® 

# " g , >',"\. ". -"." 

# J'**1,,"7S.:~~,:** : ''-::'''','" ;":-**:':i1i~' ·;;r-r-;¥~'···** **',cr..~q;;'t7.;r.j~~;>** J..-f

. 

## ''''7t::f.d1'1i. P.uo'V**~,~p\an~** 

## I 

# Ci:>**.~-",,,,~~** 

# .-< -,.'. ,,::-..**~~- ~i'.~**  ".**~''.l.',** ..**_L~.::** 

# .....-.'.t

....**~~~~.:** 

## ..;,**.;.'.:.~". '':'::;:~:::'** **.~:"** 

# :.', , .. '. :**·;'~·"~ti~Bil'd··''j'YP:'Yl** 

# ,''''**:·Y~1Ji:::i!lo,** 

## . ;f:--. '

.. (

... :.; ,lti·

.. ,'.2. 

## c-r z...

Analyst:

### tJt~ c..orJr<,,0i 

## EPA Method 

## 5/201A Sample Analysis Data

_ Soureo: 

# 4 N 

# c\ 

# z.. - 1-\, 

# '=- L () AD Project Manager: () 

# r\LC •

# ~oo......&PQ.

Motllod/l1 Method 201A Mothod 202 

### '-j 

# -3- 

# g Cl 

## M

# \~'"**~t,)t'\** 

# P 0'Wt:f\.. 

### M, 

## -z. "2.. 

# 1\0 

### '4 do.

# 1

Mlthod 51201A • RIMe Anal al. Sample 

# J Beaker 

# 1 Tar. 

# I Volume Start Oat OatefTlme Dalel11me OalelTlme Final Net

1.0. to. We"'" ImLl e We';'h'/Rv We.""'/Rv**Wel~h''''''** Welnhl Wei'



## . . . l1.-n"**~.;n.otl** ID:Z,OS S.Ol.og 1 

## Ib:'?-t7 I 

## ool.f'l 

# 1-\+ -# 

# 1 

# I c.c:. 

# I**7~.791\** 

# I® .,'/.1S5i-{' loJl'c.. 

## I'! :155'l>'

# I-)~e- I 

## 14. 

## 0, 

# ;r;t"1 cl= 

# \11.. 1

# 60

-

# ~'t. .5

# "'1.~ I 

### 10;01>

# >,ol,O~ I

# \j;6~ ,

# 1r,·el7~ 

# IO,ooJ' :> 

# YIeII\ 

# ® 11..'-11<>'\/,0 I tJQ£.,.o 

### "''11 00' 

### Pc..

. I 

## 1 ') 1

## 5 2.- U,,- 

## 5/6/0'0 5 0

...

## ·08 I "I:

.... ;;. r:J) .0$ I 

## h: 

## 2>D I

## '1{"~/ LB 

# I (Jt}tO ;o-Cp 

# ICC" 10.<;1> 

# 'Z 

# ®**?~.,!>I-ZO** I >JQ,-

# It.:>.'bll~'**~?'-** I 

# O·



# . j' 

# I' ". 

# t'1:**.1:;'~ ·"p·c'~'~r**  .. ' .' , ..", ••**"~..** .. . ...... - ._, "--"**~'I**

## ~1 

# . . . "7 

# "19 1'Z., 

# .,-tht:L>

...·. '.J'"

## ~,~q~~p§;.*.,:f\,·':i€e;~ll~*;~~;f:l**;.~o.'** 

# .' :1' 'Z J':I2h

## .J.~1 ....**_~** 

### C U ,**~.,** y' .•.. - <.. ."- ,. - " ,- •.
.. .. - ;;.l fJI 

## 1,·lJ.I -' n :J:"lV'-

.**{.I:i~** .. \**"~."** .., .**~~,** -Z;. ',

.....**I.<Fi"~...;:·,'.j'".;.l':,.;.?!l-~-i'··_;":"·.~!** ;,....:1(i't-J

..**~::· ~~il).,,:**  '; :lI:.t. ". -, V No. of rllt Run.:

- Alter Ana als Net OateJ1lme Oat&JTlme Final**W~';;h'** Sample Filter 

# T::" Oe'eilimo**W~k;htlBv** W;;;;;htIBv We/aht

1.0. 1.0. Wo'hI WelahtlBv 

### '5,ouf6 I .,: If 

### S.e.i.o'6 l**I~·.** 

### '50 I 

### (J.oZZO**tJ,/~12-**

## 1-1,,>~ 

## 11"/**GfZ-1.I~ O.l~~**  

# o:a;**~'i** II-ll'c.. 

### O.

### \~'1'Z- I

### t-J~c... I
&.<-7.**O~** 1 

## 7' §/ 5.0".<:>5 I 

## \)·.5't I 

### 0, 

# 'lit 1 d,02l.) 

# .' 

# --<1"1 o .1Z-1'Z... 

## 0·''4'21 1 

## I.He.. I 

### ":ll:J 

### O. I 

## 'i Z5 I 

### t.lf<:- 

## 6·"1.0<3 I 

## 7 

# 5q 

# >'"1.''''' 11:".58 I

### ~, 

## /29f, 

## O.o(1d Ii ;Ii (. 

# ¥ -)\1{ 

## o. '11'0 

## b ,\ 2.'11**'Il~** O. 

### i"t.'\ 

### <., I I. 6,01, 

### 0f5 I 

## 7: 

# Ek 5.01.01( I 

### 14:00 I 

### O. 0

## l"l~ 

## d,14c.t 

# ·1 'Ir**.':""2.\~** 

# o. rl.Cf\ O.IYOI 

### l!-ll'<.... 

## o·**\~O'L** IlJr'<:.. I \ Analylls Required: Project:

Mlthod m01A FSR#:



# .. U1FSR II: Project: No. of Telt Runs: 

## !VI. 7..:1.-

# A n'-\?.- 

## 1 

# /-,\,,,,,,,**f~ 5-~**  

### ·EPA Metho. 201A Sample Analysis Data**o~** l.. Source: 

# iAN IT 

# 2...
- Ux, I 

## !-oA0 Project Manager: 

# £rW Analyst: 

# tJEA-**'--O~f2.-ct** !7i"MS/N6£/!. Analyel. Required: 

### lID Method" ( -, 

### CJ Method 2111A 

### CJ Method 202 Method 51201A Altsr Anal .1, Sample Filar Ta

..**[)~tefTlme D~~m9**  OatalTlme FInal Net

1.0. 1.0. Weloht We1ghl/By We hUBv WelahUBv Weklht We!Qht

### 5.~.o'l> l 

### 7: 

# 5D 5. 

### O&Ol' 

# \}53 

# , L()".) 

## 6 

# tz- z..\\ 

### 0

.. \ \0"1 

## c. \ 14>'5' 1JQe- 0·\1 

# CD? ' 

# "*- 

# , ().11('5**O,Q~**

### 5,~s.oa 

## ' 7:'1!o> 'C;. 

### oS.Zl8' I?; 

## :50 

# ,**~(",** - 2.\0 

### Dill) 

## 0.\ 2. 

## 31' N'?C- 0.\).."';,'0 I I 

## (),**I~!** 

## 0, bOf6"**5.o~.0"\** l 

## 7'·,-\3 b. 0 

### 1$

### .o~,**I~:** 

# y 

# , Jtl 

# ,11-"2.\1- 0·' \ 

# IS O. \ 

## 2.0) I

### ~f'c- 

### C>'**\'l..o~, ~c..**  

# ,. fl. 

# ,zoz. 0, OQ87**5.o11.~** 

## '1''10 §.. 

## og.06' 

## 13:**l.f~** I 

# 4g 

# Hal. 0,1\42- C.II 

## 'gI' tJPc o· 11g- 

# 'i 

# '"We.. 

# , IJ,JI 

# 8Y- 0,**Q~'I** 

# zNet We; Flnal Weight


### 71/.**r,JtI-~f** 

# I**O·fl~~t...**


### 7

### '/,S15f.,. I o,P0

### 37
7'1,17

### 'to 

## I 0'. /)Of,?>

## ~111.£1~~ 

# p,**t1t1~i'** -t- • .,., • OaleiTlme Wei

# ::.I~:~~~~:·:i;~~~~ 

# .( 

# ... Method 51201A • C') I Rln•• Ana .Is Beaker T&re Datefllme DalelTlme Sample W' UB We

1.0. 1.0. Wei hi: 

## S.O'6.oi '\:15 .1.o'i'_o'il' 

# ,6:2.0 

# kJ**~~** 

# I Cfv\**17'i~?171** 

# Oi) 

# I

..,.., , 'f0l0 IJQc.. 1L\.cjL/o '08:- 

## !i'{.S2 1

## '1

# I-~' 

# I 5 0'6**_o~, ~:";,,**  

### 6.O't.o$ , 

### I 

## Ii', 

# 60**~(..** 

# I 

# CrJ 1 

# '-l

..S1.5/i tolfC 1'-1. 

## 5**,~("** 

### rJ\lc 

# cO S.O .<>'2l ' 

# r"f:·z.o 

# 1.7 1"\.1111 7 ,11'10' 

## lJPc.. ,,'**,.~~** •• ' c'. 

# :**~...;;:\**

1,(

## J"(ifs1"';II~' 

# C?

## . EPA Method 

## 5/201A Sample Analysls'Data I U, c:.

Analysis Required: No. of Teat Runs: 

## ('-\\",

...**ko~ \/~**  Source: \.(fU 

### iT Z.
- 

## Lov,) '-0 '" \) Project Monoger: 

# I.:>r

......... Analyst: 

# IJU-......**u~a.c:r(.** Method' 

# '1 Mothod201A Method 202 

# 1-:1.-

CI 

## ....... '2..L. Ao'lL.1 FSR#: Project:



# ...**-~** 

# ........

# _ ....... "- Filter Anal 'li Simple Filler

## J~~ OatelTime Dal&'11me Oal&frlme F""I Nel

1.0. 1.0. W hi WeklhtlBv Weklhllllv

. '. WokJhllllv Welnht Weklh' ,.;. OlS .0$ I '1 .." 

## 6 ryg.of.' 

## I'-{ 

# , I ' 

### .. 

## Low 

# 1t-l G£1: 204> 

### 0./D% 0, II 

# :> '0 ' 0\'c- 

## 0.\154 I

### t-l~c. "" 

# , (), /lS-e, 

### O. QO/,3 

# . .'

. 

## b.

## ()~~ I

## l~'.oo .**~:. §.o~.os**  I 

# 1'.,., i' 

# , :112 -'2,01 0·1107 

### C.II'S'

## V~c.. 

## C.\I'll!! I

### N~c.. 

# o. 00

## "9 

# , IJ.ll7v .;, ::nwl! I ') '. 

## z., b

.. 06.a! 1 

## \? '" 

## 1 I 

# id -2.cJl**O.\I'~** 

# o. \'251' 

# rJfc (). I 

## Z.Sb I**N~L-** Q./'..,,, 

### O,OIJrl I. 

### "5. D$

## ,m I 

### 1'.30 ';.D8 

## .01 I 

## I"**")~** I


# , II**~~** 

# ,

# Ii

.. '-2d'j 

## 0. LI9,:, 

## C . \'2.0.\"1 I 

### O.lz<t3**Itl,~,** I 

## 0./''1-3 D,OO(,O

Ne' W,IQht Final We



### 7.-.: 33/7 10. 

# ooz.o 73,.,./U I 

## 0, {)IZ(,


### 7(,'/.NB 

## I 0.0027 Oatel11me WelghVB'

## ~4-'lil, 

## •• ', i" :., 

# '.1'73, S/0l9J" 

# 1.,1, 107..7**f,\~c,...** 

### 1/,.:';0 OalefTlme WekJhtIB' Rln

.. Analvsit: bal8lTWn8 WeklhtIB

## 7".\~4"lIIU~L. £.**D'6,~** I 

### IO:t-5 

## 6.D'6.d!' II: 

# ,5
5,0'&.08 I 

## fO'.I.t5 j 

## 3

.**'d-I~~' ~c..:**  StArt Date. ,_I Volume

'mL'



## A..**'1~2..\** 

## 72,.**~1.-'\1** 

# 7'!>**:~,l** f,.'1-



## CL-. c.l£- 

# C1: 

# CT**~)** 

## -ill.. Sample-i- 

### -se-aker

1.0. 

### I 1.0. 

## i.o...J It 

# 1



# f,-\ ''I" 

# l ' I.,.

# """"~"il~ti •

# .!:,~ki~,.,}".'",,I.i:~~ I 

## JJI?<- Method M01A

- 

## ...JSource:

Analyst: 

## LI to 

## II Z-

- (v... \ 

## b LOfJ;:::;- Project Man.ger:

## J:.~ 

# N£i'. I.- 

### c.. CJ

## ~~ 

# 117i'M 5/lVtfli7?- 

## W1A Sample Analysis "Data 

## EPA MethOt

a'!I Method! 

### I

# 7 D Method 201A 

### D Method 202

### l-~ 

## lV\","'-\t..c 

# M z:z...**AO~~J**

hod 51201A Project:

An.lysls Required: No. of Teat Runs: FSR#:

,

### .... , - Filter Analval' Sample Filler Tare OalefTimo OateITme Datemme FInal Net

1.0. 1.0. Welnht WeI.hllBv WelahUBv WelahUB, Welohl Wek.hl 11115 I (J(,IO 

### :>/13 I 

### 12-t/-3 I 

### (vi. 

### Ij) lot

# 1.- 13'1(;, 6. \12

# «i 0.111(, 1 

## -rs O,/Z5£"" I I 0,1:11S' 

### 0,0111**$"II~** 1**O~Dz..** 

### 51/3- I 

### IH7 I

### ~z..

## ll-{()~ 0.1\ 

## 3\ 0,1231> 1 

### 7S 0'/2.$1> I I 

### (J,I'Hs 0,616'1 

### £'/13 1 

### 1Jt. 

## P7 .:51/3 I**t~1** 1 

# -rl3 130\,-\ 0.1139 0,123(" 1

. 

# rs (),/Z'J, 1 

# r.s I.**()'/~!l>** C.**4"9~** 1 1 I



## .. 1 I I

Start**Oa~e** 

# 5"/'i' 

# 5/t 

# s/g ",

.**i~-': .·~"l'~);i·~:~r~** **;;:~<.:. ':::r~.** 



# 1·/,

.;:'J

# J~: 

# tru;; Rinn' Anatv.l, 

# T 

# T o;.:;ome**D8:~:=** Dalel'Tine 'Finaf**~el** W hWv Wei WelehUBv Weicht Weicht 

### :>/13 IOSVy 5/13 1**/;.;J~ 7~."U9**  I 

### -rS 

### 73, 

## (,/,r' I 

### rS 

# I 1

### I?J,G>/l'~ 

## I b, 0030 

### Sit!> 1 

## osr/ 

# 5/ /

3 I**/~~** t> 

### 73. /511 1 

### 73 "J,lrl/. I 

### IS 

# 1 I 

## 173, Int." 

# I 6,6 U0

# 7 ,;-/13 I 

### o5S1f 

# 5/13 I 1 'Z..rJr 

## '4,1737 1 

### 73' 1'1,1732. I 

### T.S I 

# Iw, 173Z.1 0, 170"7**,~t:· ~'.:~"-:**  li**,~:r** ..**~i:':** 

### . '.f**~v ~,**  . 

## . . .. 

## , ".' ./ 

# '.Source: FSR#: Project: 

### 114 l. 

### Zt+O'lZ7 M

## ,~",)(" fCA

## EPA Method 

## 5/201.A Sample Analysis Data U",f-PZ

- ,<-flO**Lp/~'i:7** Project Manager: 

# B-u Ce. 

# da II
No. of Test Runs: Analysis Required:

Method 51201 A 

## '1-7 Analyst: 

## 0"-' SiHfr;p- 

# , [!J' Mathod 17 

# o Method 201A 

# o Mothod202



## <.D Filter Anat .1, Sample Filler Tate OatelT1me**O~~JfT16** 0.,.",.., Final Net

1.0. 1.0. Wet hi WelohVB, We htIB\I WelohVB' WekJht WAk>ht 

### 5'/13 I 0(,10 5'/13 I**l~r<I** I /1110 

# L/ 61FE- 

### ot/-(, P,**1/~rl'** 0.IZt{3 I O,I;Jllt I 

# rs I 

### (J./;I/z... 

### Mil'!**5/1~** I 0(,1'f**~/3** I 

### 1:l-S"1' I MIl) 

# S-**~Z-V't,l7** 

# o. I/Stl'}- 0.1315' I 

### 7"S 

### P,f3,r I 

### 7"s I O. I;.S-**6,~/~/** 

### i!>/13 I O&. 17 

### S"jl!> I If 

### HI I 

### Mill 

## 6r;z-1JIIi' O,II'IP"r f),1 Zf{, I 

## n ",/Z.,(, I 

## rs I. 

### b. 

## rz ,I, D.**f)11j.~** S'/I:, I f)(, Z**~7/3** I 

### 13"'; I NIt) 

# 7 t.£Z.-1/(J 

### 0./ 1"$1,- 'IS 0, 

# 1""3 D.OIC't O. 12<./Z, I 

### 0,/,.1/1 I I
Method 51201A • RInse Anal al. Net Dotemmo OatelTime OatalTime Samp&e BoDket Taro Volumo Start Date Wo!QhVBv Weight Wo htIB We VB 1.0. 1.0. We ht mL

### S1J~ I 

### l!3iJ( 

## 5/J'f I 

## PT'IS NIP 

# 'I 

# I 

# C, 17"**;'l.~O** 

# I '13 !i'11Z- 

### 15,7zt7 I I 

# rs I I 

## 175, 7Z 

### fl 

# I P. 0011 

### TS 'K, 

### 7t'1l**sj/~** I**1~/z...** 

### :>/1<1 I 

### 07Y" MI{) 

# I CU

## 11~ 113f 

# I 3Z- 

# 15/11.- I 

## 7'"s 75.I1>f I I 

### 0, f)dt7 

### 75': 1"""6" 5/13 I 

### /.31'1 5/1'1 I 

## o1ro MID 

# " I 

# Cv 7rJ,7NI qq 

# S/ IZ- 7'1,7/1,'1 I "T3 I 

### 7'/, ?I{,4 

# I tJ. 1m3 1t1,7/5"f I 

### 71>

,-**}P~** ,,- y**;.~.** __**~,.:** .....**=~.** -"-:"< '; ", '." , 01 ••**--~ i~M~If"7**  

### ....



# ..**J\{~:fVU.** 

# Jo, mf**'.~.,** 

# vJ 1:3, 

# 'SJIZ. .' 

# CCompany: Plant: Unit Run: Minnkota MRYoung 

### Unil2 High 

### 1 Example Calculations Page 

### 1 014

Dry Molecular Weight Md 

# = 0.44 x (%C02) 

### + 0.32 x (%02) 

### + 0.28 X %N 2 

### O/OC02 

### =
Md=
Wet Molecular Weight 13.3 7.6 79.1

Ms = Md 

### x (1-Bws) + (18.0 

### x Bws)
Md=
Ms=
Flue Gas Pressure 30.43 0.19

Ps 

### = Pbar + (Pstalic/13.6)
Pbar= 27.70 Pstatic 

### = -1.20
Ps = 27.61
Average Meter Temperature
n Avg Tin = 

### 1: Tin 

# ,., n

n Avg Tout = 

### 1: Tout

n Tm = 460+ (Avg Tin 

### + Avg Tout)12 Avg Tin = Tm= 79.6
538.5 AvgTout=



# zo n.3Example Calculations Page 2 of4 Ideal lsoklnetic Sampling Nozzle Inside Diameter (based on initial assumptions): On 

## = (0.0353 x am x 

### Pm x (Is X Mslo.• 

# t·· (Tm x Cp x (1-Bws) x (Ps x "'P) ) Om= Ms= Bws 

### = __0::.;

..:..75=-_Pm

.. _--=2::-7,;;:.9",3

__Tm =

__**0~,"",20,,-_Ps** = _-=2:.;.7;.:;.83=-_Ts = 

### _.......,54':'O=:: • .=..O

__ Cp 

### = 27.61 aP = 

# --==-- 640.0 0.840 1.10 One 

### 0.222 Actual On" 0.205
Isokinetlc Sampling 

### "X" Factor 

### (based on Initial assumptions): X= 846.72 x On' x aHOI xCp' x (1-Bwsy x (Md' Ps) (Ms' Pm) On= Bws 

### = Ms= _---=,0:.=.20=::5=--_aH@I=_----'1"'.7..=34..:...._Cp= 0.20 Md 

# = 30.42 Ps = ----:2==7=.9==3--Pm = 27.83 0.840 27.61**.~** 

## x = 1.265 Actual 

### X = 

### 1.265
MI at Sample Point· Example Point 

### Ai
"'Hi 

### = 

# xx",Pi 

## x 

## ill!:!il (Tsi) 

### 633 Tsi=

# --==-- Tini =

__.=..53::.;7

__ 1.10 ",Pi 

### =---'''-'''-- Mli= 

### 1.18 Meter Volume 

### at Standard Conditions Vm(std) = YxVmx**~x** (POOr +aHavg/13.61 29.92 Tm Y= 1.004 Vm= 28.878 Pbar= "'Havg = 1.09 Tm= 538.5 Vm(std) '" 

### 26.397 27.70



# 21.Example Calculations Page 3 of4 Volume of Water Vapor Condensed Vwc(sld) ; Net 

### H,o= Vwc(std) 

### = Moisture Content 

### Bws;
Vwc(sld) 

### = Bws 

### = Average Duct Velocity 0.0471 x (net 

### H2

### 0 gain)
131.5

Vwc(std) (Vwc(sld)+Vm(std)) _--=.:6.",,1940..:-_ Vm(std) _-=.26",.3;:;.:9:.,:.7

__

Vs 

### = 85-49 x 

### Cp x 

### Sqrl 

### AP (avg) x (Ts (avg)/ (Ps x MS))'12 

### Cp= Ps 

### = Vs= _-::;0.:;:;82;.:1:...-_Tsavg 

### = _--:6:;3.::,:0.:;9

__ 

### Sqrl 

### AP (avg): 27.61 Ms 

### = 28.07 

### _-=:.:..::::.:...- 1.001

Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual Basis) Q= VsxAx60
Vs 

# = Q= 63.39
1867091 490.873**.~** Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard Basis) Qstd 

# = Qx Ps Tsavg**x~** 29.92
1867091 Ps 

### =

__ 2::;7"".6::..1:.-_Tsavg 

### = 630.9 Qstd= 1441978



# 22Example Calculations Page4of4 Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard Dry Basis) Qstd(dry) = Qstd 

### x (l-Bws) Qstd = Qstd(dry) 

### = lsokinlltic Variation: 1441978 Bws = 

### 1167938 0.190



### %150=

Ts = M= Bws 

### = %180= 0.0945 x Ts x Vm(std) Vs 

### x 

### II x-An x Ps 

### x (l-Bws)
630.9 Vm(std)**_--=:.26~.:::39:-:.7** __ Vs 

# = 0.000229 

### II 

### = 48.0 

### Ps 

### = 0.19 63.393 27.61

PM Concentration
- example for filterable: Co = M • 0.0154 Vm(sld)
M= Co= _---:3;.;:2;;...4'--_Vm(std) _-=26;:..:

..::.;39,-,7

__ 

## llJUn gr/dscf
PM Emission Rate· example for filterable Iblhr ER = 

### Co • 0.00858 • Qstd(dry) Co=
ER= 0.0189
189.42 Ib/hr



# 23 Qsld(dry) 

# = 1167938