alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Salvatore Iannuzzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

|        | By:    | /s/ SALVATORE IANNUZZI                                   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Salvatore Iannuzzi  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Date: May 9, 2007                                   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained byMonster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4190 

To enhance criminal penalties for straw purchasers of firearms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2012 

Mr. SCHIFF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To enhance criminal penalties for straw purchasers of 

firearms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Straw Purchaser Pen5 alty Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT FOR CERTAIN STRAW 

7 PURCHASERS. 

8 Section 924 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(q)(1) Whoever violates section 922(a)(6) or sub11 section (a)(1)(A) of this section— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4190 IH

1 ‘‘(A) knowing or having reason to believe that 

2 the violation will further the transfer of 2 or more 

3 firearms to a person prohibited by law from ship4 ping, transporting, possessing or receiving a firearm; 

5 and 

6 ‘‘(B) with the intent to conceal from the trans7 feror of the firearm the identity of the person re8 ferred to in subparagraph (A), 

9 shall, in addition to the punishment otherwise provided for 

10 the violation, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 

11 2 years. 

12 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law: 

13 ‘‘(A) The court shall not place on probation any 

14 person convicted of a violation described in para15 graph (1). 

16 ‘‘(B) The court shall not reduce a term of im17 prisonment to be imposed for such a violation so as 

18 to compensate for, or otherwise take into account, a 

19 term of imprisonment imposed or to be imposed for 

20 a separate such violation. 

21 ‘‘(C)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), a term 

22 of imprisonment imposed on a person under this 

23 subsection shall not run concurrently with a term of 

24 imprisonment imposed on the person under any 

25 other provision of law. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4190 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) A term of imprisonment imposed on a per2 son for such a violation may, in the discretion of the 

3 court, run concurrently, in whole or in part, with an4 other term of imprisonment imposed on the person 

5 by the court at the same time for a separate such 

6 violation, subject to applicable guidelines and policy 

7 statements issued by the Sentencing Commission 

8 pursuant to section 994 of title 28. 

9 ‘‘(3) The Attorney General shall issue regulations re10 quiring any form required to be completed by the pur11 chaser of a firearm from a person licensed under section 

12 923 to include a notice of the provisions of this sub13 section.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §247b–4g. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–55, title I, §104(a), Nov. 27, 2013, 127 Stat. 643

Section, Pub. L. 109–450, §5, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3343, related to establishment and activities of the Interagency Coordinating Council on Prematurity and Low Birthweight.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 19, 2004, Organichem, Corporation, 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIDextropoxyphene (9273)
II
 The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use internally and for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative, Office of Liaison and Policy (ODLR) and must be filed no later than February 4, 2005. Dated: November 22, 2004. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 04-26737 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### § 204.43 Governing law.

This Guaranty shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
§ 123.8 Special controls on vessels, aircraft and satellites covered by the U.S. Munitions List. ( a ) Transferring registration or control to a foreign person of any aircraft, vessel, or satellite on the U.S. Munitions List is an export for purposes of this subchapter and requires a license or written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. This requirement applies whether the aircraft, vessel, or satellite is physically located in the United States or abroad.
( b ) The registration in a foreign country of any aircraft, vessel or satellite covered by the U.S. Munitions List which is not registered in the United States but which is located in the United States constitutes an export. A license or written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is therefore required. Such transactions may also require the prior approval of the U.S. Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration, the Federal Aviation Administration or other agencies of the U.S. Government.
[71 FR 20540, Apr. 21, 2006]
Filed 5/15/13 Estate of Giraldin CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

Estate of WILLIAM A. GIRALDIN, Deceased.

___________________ ________________ CHRISTINE GIRALDIN et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

TIMOTHY GIRALDIN et al.,

Defendants and Appellants. G041811

(Super. Ct. No. A240697)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION, DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING, AND MODIFYING OPINION; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

The request for publication contained in the letter filed April 30, 2013 by attorney William A. Salzwedel is DENIED. Th e clerk of this court is directed, pursuant to rule 8.1120(b) of the California Rules of Court, to forward to the Supreme Court, within 15 days of the finality of the opinion in this case, a copy of attorney Salzwedel’s request, together with a copy of the opinion, a nd this denial order. It does not appear that our opinion meets the standards set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 8.1105(c);2 attorney Salzwedel’s letter is merely a vehicle to express disagreement with the merits of

the decision. The petition for rehearing filed by Appe llant Timothy Giraldin May 2, 2013

is DENIED. The opinion filed April 16, 2013 is hereby modified in the following particulars: (1) On page 7 of the s lip opinion, replace “The su rcharge order was” in the second full paragraph with the words “The tw o surcharge orders were” such that the sentence now reads: “The two surcharge orders were based on the trial judge’s determination that by 2001 William lacked the mental ca pacity to authorize the SafeTzone investment or any other transac tion Timothy undertook with regard to the

trust.” (2) On page 13 of the slip opini on, replace the first sentence of the disposition with: “The two surcharge orders discussed in this opinion and based on Timothy’s actions during Willia m’s lifetime are reversed, and the matter remanded for further proceedings consiste nt with this opinion.” These modifications do not affect a change in judgment.

BEDSWORTH, ACTING P. J. I CONCUR:

ARONSON, J.
§ 1429.15 Board requests for advisory opinions. ( a ) Whenever the Board, pursuant to section 1007(c)(2)(f) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4107) requests an advisory opinion from the Director of the Office of Personnel Management concerning the proper interpretation of rules, regulations, or policy directives issued by that Office in connection with any matter before the Board, a copy of such request, and any response thereto, shall be served upon the parties in the matter.
( b ) The parties shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of service a copy of the response of the Office of Personnel Management to file with the Board comments on that response which the parties wish the Board to consider before reaching a decision in the matter. Such comments shall be in writing and copies shall be served upon the parties in the manner and upon the Office of Personnel Management.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONS 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov /region08 

### AUG - 1 2012 Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL Rebecca K. Skiba Senior Counsel Marathon Oil Company 5555 SanFelipe Houston, Texas 77056

RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Oil andNatural Gas Production Facilities DearMs. Skiba, This is to notify you that the EPAhas issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in orderto regulate emissions from oil and natural gas productionfacilities located onthe Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air quality regulations for the protection ofcommunities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIPrequires owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions ofvolatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. The rule is effective with this actual notice to Marathon Oil Company for purposes ofenforcement beginning at 5p.m. (eastern daylight time) onAugust 3, 2012. We will accept comments onthe proposed rule for 45 days from the date ofpublication inthe Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, LisaJackson, signedthe interim final rule onAugust 1,2012,and the agency is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR).A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule serves as the official version for purposes ofcompliance until the interim final rule is published inthe FR. Please refer to the published version in a forthcoming FRpublication, which will appear on the Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/searchlhome.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in Docket No. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. Ifyou have any questions on the interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431. 

# c;JJ{

Carl Daly, Director Air Program Enclosures



### 2 

# * Printedon RecycledPaper
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


****Date: November 18, 2004
By:
/s/ *George P. Morris*George P. MorrisChief Financial Officer





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.








Exhibit 32.1
H. R. 4155 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To direct the head of each Federal department and agency to treat relevant military 

training as sufficient to satisfy training or certification requirements for Federal 

licenses. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Skills to Jobs Act’’. 

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAINING FOR 

ISSUANCE OF A FEDERAL LICENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The head of each Federal licensing authority 

shall consider and may accept, in the case of any individual applying 

for a license, any relevant training received by such individual 

while serving as a member of the armed forces, for the purpose 

of satisfying the requirements for such license. 

(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act— 

(1) the term ‘‘license’’ means a license, certification, or 

other grant of permission to engage in a particular activity; 

(2) the term ‘‘Federal licensing authority’’ means a department, agency, or other entity of the Government having 

authority to issue a license; 

(3) the term ‘‘armed forces’’ has the meaning given such 

term by section 2101(2) of title 5, United States Code; and 

(4) the term ‘‘Government’’ means the Government of the 

United States. 

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

The head of each Federal licensing authority shall— 

(1) with respect to any license a licensing authority grants 

or is empowered to grant as of the date of enactment of this 

Act, prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this Act 

not later than 180 days after such date; and 

(2) with respect to any license of a licensing authority 

not constituted or not empowered to grant the license as of 

the date of enactment of this Act, prescribe any regulations 

necessary to carry out this Act not later than 180 days after 
H. R. 4155—2 

the date on which the agency is so constituted or empowered, 

as the case may be. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### M. B. L. Distributors, Inc., Respondent, v Burton Kahn et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 16, 1976, which denied appellants’ motion to dismiss the second cause of action of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7). Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss the second cause of action as against appellants granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint (repleading the said cause of action). Plaintiff’s time to serve the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry thereof. In our opinion the second cause of action (1) fails to plead reliance by plaintiff-respondent, (2) fails to plead knowledge by appellants of the falsity of their alleged representations, and (3) fails to comply with the requirement of particularity as set forth in CPLR 3016 (subd [b]). The second cause of action is ambiguous and it would require extreme speculation to sustain it as presently pleaded (see *Brackett v Griswold,*112 NY 454; *Brickner v Linden City Realty,*23 AD2d 560; *Meltzer v Klein,*29 AD2d 548). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Louise Hoey, Appellant, v John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and Anna C. Hoey, Respondent.

In an action to recover the proceeds of a group life insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 12, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint and directed that the proceeds of the policy be paid to the respondent Anna C. Hoey. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Berman at Special Term. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27391]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 7, 2004.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before January 14, 
2005 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0633.
    Notice Numbers: Notices 437, 437-A, 438 and 466.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notice of Intention to Disclose.
    Description: Notice is required by 26 U.S.C. 6100(f). A reply is 
necessary if the recipient disagrees with the Service's proposed 
deletions. The Service uses the reply to consider the propriety of 
making additional deletions to the public inspection version of written 
determinations or related background file documents.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit, Not-for-profit institutions, Farms, State, Local or tribal 
government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,250.
    Estimated Burden Hours Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 2,625 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Cognitive and Psychological Research.
    Description: The proposed research will improve the quality of the 
data collection by examining the psychological and cognitive aspects of 
methods and procedures such as: interviewing processes, forms redesign, 
survey and tax collection technology and operating procedures (internal 
and external in nature).
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 75,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Recordkeeper: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 37,500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: R. Joseph Durbala (202) 622-3634, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr. (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27391 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18
U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Blue Water Vaccines Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:



(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 31, 2022 | /s/
Jon Garfield           
|-------------------- | ---------------------------
|                     | Jon Garfield,              
|                     | Chief Financial
    Officer