alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION 

Approval 

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting: 

Thursday, October 20, 2016 

3:00 PM Discussion of Security Issues (Closed Ex. 1) 

 

The Commission voted 3 to 0 on October 20, 2016, to close this briefing 

which is reasonably expected to involve classified information. 

 

Attendance 

- Commissioners and members of their staff 

- Executive Director for Operations and members of his staff 

- Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response and members of his staff 

- Representatives of Commission Staff Offices 

Contact Person for More Information 

Glenn Ellmers, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0442) 

 

 /RA/ 

 Glenn Ellmers 

 Office of the Secretary 

 10/20/2016
#### § 1502.10 Judicial review.

On complaint, the district court of the United States in the district in which the complainant resides, or has his/her principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia, has jurisdiction to enjoin the Foundation from withholding Foundation records, and to order the production of any agency records improperly withheld from the complainant (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B)).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 25, 2019

No. 04-18-00623-CR

Matthew SERNA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-0186-CRA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on September 26, 2019. No further extensions absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00418-CV

TEJAS ASSET HOLDINGS, LLC APPELLANT

V.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO 

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC

APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 352-256972-11

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: July 3, 2014
§ 1508.345 What happens if I fail to disclose information required under § 1508.335? If we later determine that you failed to disclose information under § 1508.335 that you knew at the time you entered into the covered transaction, we may— ( a ) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
( b ) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27154]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-03-840-1610-241A]


Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Advisory Committee 
Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Canyons of 
the Ancients National Monument (Monument) Advisory Committee 
(Committee), will meet as directed below.

DATES: A meeting will be held January 11, 2005, at the Anasazi Heritage 
Center in Dolores, Colorado at 9 a.m. The public comment period for the 
meeting will begin at approximately 10:30 a.m. and the meeting will 
adjourn at approximately 12 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LouAnn Jacobson, Monument Manager or 
Stephen Kandell, Monument Planner, Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Hwy 
184, Dolores, Colorado 81323; Telephone (970) 882-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The eleven member committee provides counsel 
and advice to the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, 
concerning development and implementation of a management plan 
developed in accordance with FLMPA, for public lands within the 
Monument. At this meeting, topics we plan to discuss include planning 
issues and management concerns, planning alternatives, planning vision 
statement, grazing subcommittee nominees and other issues as 
appropriate.
    The meeting will be open to the public and will include a time set 
aside for public comment. Interested persons may make oral statements 
at the meeting or submit written statements at any meeting. Per-person 
time limits for oral statements may be set to allow all interested 
persons an opportunity to speak.
    Summary minutes of all Committee meetings will be maintained at the 
Anasazi Heritage Center in Dolores, Colorado. They are available for 
public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within 
thirty (30) days of the meeting. In addition, minutes and other 
information concerning the Committee can be obtained from the Monument 
planning Web site at: http://www.blm.gov/rmp/canm which will be updated 
following each Committee meeting.

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
LouAnn Jacobson,
Monument Manager, Canyons of the Ancients National Monument.
[FR Doc. 04-27154 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
### §§1973d, 1973e. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–246, §3(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 580

Section 1973d, Pub. L. 89–110, title I, §6, Aug. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 439; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 91–285, §2, June 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 314; amended Pub. L. 94–73, title II, §§205, 206, Aug. 6, 1975, 89 Stat. 402; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783; Pub. L. 103–94, §5, Oct. 6, 1993, 107 Stat. 1005, related to appointment of Federal voting examiners.

Section 1973e, Pub. L. 89–110, title I, §7, Aug. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 440; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 91–285, §2, June 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 314; amended 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, related to examination of applicants for registration.
~ €.

# It-

# "'\ft::>k

# :r p- (~....."

...•.•.• ,•• 

## 1,..1 Adams. Kevin (OSn

From: 

### Sent: To:

Cc: 

### Subject: Attachments: Adams, Kevin (OSn Thursday, December 

### OS,2013 12:41 PM Jamestown, ND, Airport Authority Chairman, James Boyd, ;Jamestown, ND, Chamber of Commerce, FeliciaSargeant; Jamestown, ND, Mayor, Katie Anderson; Jamestown, ND, Travel. Brandi VanGilder; Jamestown, NDS,Airport Manager, Matthew Letiner; 'John Nord'; 1msairport@daictel.com'; Chamber@steliarnet.com; Devils Lake,Administration, Terry Johnston; Devils Lake,Mayor, Richard Johnson; ForwardDL@Steliarnet.com SkyWest, Brad Rawson; 'Mike Matthews' RE:EASProposals at Devils Lakeand Jamestown, ND Bid, Sovereign at DVLand JMs.pdf

Kevin HiAll,
I inadvertently omitted the timely-filed proposal of Sovereign Air, attached above. 

### ~~. 

## r;>:~.~~: --jC/)~ 

## c,-o--'J -nO::::! 

### rn::O:'. 

# D ::--':;::;!~

. ~=<:::!-;. From: Adams, Kevin (OST) r:y 

## 6~~ sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 9:52 AM U1 

# J3 To: Jamestown, ND, Airport Authority Chairman, James Boyd, ; Jamestown, ND, Chamber of Commerce, Felicia sargeant ; Jamestown, ND, Mayor, Katie Anderson; Jamestown, ND,Travel, Brandi VanGilder; Jamestown, NDS, Airport Manager, Matthew Letiner; 'John Nord'; Jmsairoort@daictel.com; Chamber@stellarnet.com; Devils Lake, Administration, Terry Johnston; Devils Lake, Mayor, Richard Johnson; ForwardDL@Steliarnet.com Cc: SkyWest, Brad Rawson; 'Mike Matthews' 

### Subject: EAS Proposals at Devils Lake and Jamestown, ND

HiAll,
Attached above are the two timely-filed proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS)at Devils Lake and Jamestown, North Dakota, submitted by Great LakesAviation, Ltd., and SkyWest Airlines in response to Order 2013-10-14. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposals are directly from the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-051-1997-2785, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding.
Please note that SkyWest's proposals do not meet minimum EASrequirements in terms of frequency because it proposes to operate only 7 nonstop round trips perweek at each community.
The next step in the carrier-selection process isfor you to provide uswith your community's comments, acritically important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, Iaskthat everyone get back to us, preferably byemail, no later than January 6, 2014. We will docket this email, aswell asany replies.
In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have any questions, call me, and get backto us bythe deadline, January 6, 2014.
Best,

Kevin Adams 202-366-1047
§ 1424.7 Response of the exclusive representative; time limits for filing; service. ( a ) Within fifteen (15) days after the date of receipt by an exclusive representative of a copy of the Department's statement of position the exclusive representative shall file a full and detailed response stating its position and reasons for disagreeing with the Department's allegation that the matter, as proposed to be bargained, is inconsistent with applicable law or rule or regulation.
( b ) A copy of the response of the exclusive representative including all attachments thereto shall be served on the Secretary and on the Department's representative of record in the proceedings before the Board.
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of August 27, 2019 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2019-3 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2022, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2022.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
### §§1961c to 1961c–8. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–467, title IV, §410(a), Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1316

Section 1961c, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §300, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, related to cooperation of Federal, State and private agencies with Secretary of the Interior who was directed to make information on relevant projects available. See section 7877(a) of this title.

Section 1961c–1, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §301, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, related to lack of authority of Secretary of the Interior over water resources research of other Federal agencies and lack of effect that this chapter had on existing authorities and responsibilities of Federal agencies. See section 7881 of this title.

Section 1961c–2, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §302, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, related to advance payments of initial expenses. See section 7818 of this title.

Section 1961c–3, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §303, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, made expenditures of funds for scientific or technological research or development activity conditioned upon availability to public of resulting information and developments, and provided that background patent rights would be unaffected. See section 7879 of this title.

Section 1961c–4, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §304, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, established a cataloging center. See section 7853 of this title.

Section 1961c–5, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §305, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 332, related to interagency coordination of water resources research. See section 7877(b) of this title.

Section 1961c–6, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §306, July 17, 1964, 78 Stat. 333; Pub. L. 92–175, §6, Dec. 2, 1971, 85 Stat. 494, defined "State". See section 7817 of this title.

Section 1961c–7, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 89–404, §2, Apr. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 130, and amended Pub. L. 92–175, §7, Dec. 2, 1971, 85 Stat. 494, required Secretary of the Interior to make an annual report to the President and Congress. See section 7880 of this title.

Section 1961c–8, Pub. L. 88–379, title III, §308, as added Pub. L. 92–175, §8, Dec. 2, 1971, 85 Stat. 494, empowered Secretary of the Interior to convey excess personal property to cooperating institutes, educational institutions and nonprofit organizations. See section 7878 of this title.
#### Oscar M. Hayman and Others, Respondents, v. Canton Art Metal Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### William F. Sutton, Appellant, v. George W. Herz et al., as Trustees, et al., Respondents.

On the call of the calendar, on motion by respondents Herz and MeArdle, appeal dismissed. There was no appearance for appellant, and appellant failed to comply with an order of this court, dated January 22, 1962, requiring him to perfect his appeal for the April 1962 Term. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 1300.5 Quorum and voting requirements. ( a ) *Quorum requirements.* A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, which shall include at least one private sector member of the Board.
( b ) *Voting.* The Board votes on items of business in meetings conducted pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act.
PUBLIC LAW 115–376—DEC. 21, 2018 132 STAT. 5113 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6591: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Sept. 28, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–376 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 501 South 

Kirkman Road in Orlando, Florida, as the ‘‘Napoleon ‘Nap’ Ford Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAPOLEON ‘‘NAP’’ FORD POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 501 South Kirkman Road in Orlando, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Napoleon ‘Nap’ Ford Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Napoleon ‘Nap’ Ford Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 6591] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 1306.15 Hearings. ( a ) If an employee timely files a request for a hearing under § 1306.14, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5514(a)(2), the hearing official shall select the time, date, and location of the hearing.
( b ) Hearings shall be conducted by a hearing official not under the supervision or control of MCC or an administrative law judge.
( c ) *Procedure.* ( 1 ) After the employee requests a hearing, the hearing official shall notify the employee of the form of the hearing to be provided. If the hearing will be oral, notice shall set forth the date, time and location of the hearing. If the hearing will be paper, the employee shall be notified that he or she should submit arguments in writing to the hearing official by a specified date after which the record shall be closed. This date shall give the employee reasonable time to submit documentation.
( 2 ) *Oral hearing.* An employee who requests an oral hearing shall be provided an oral hearing if the hearing official determines that the matter cannot be resolved by review of documentary evidence alone (e.g., when an issue of credibility or veracity is involved). The hearing is not an adversarial adjudication, and need not take the form of an evidentiary hearing.
( 3 ) *Paper hearing.* If the hearing official determines that an oral hearing is not necessary, he or she will make a decision based upon a review of the available written record.
( 4 ) *Record.* The hearing official must maintain a summary record of any hearing provided by this subpart. Witnesses who provide testimony will do so under oath or affirmation.
( 5 ) *Content of decision.* The written decision shall include: ( i ) A statement of the facts presented to support the origin, nature, and amount of the debt;
( ii ) The hearing official's findings, analysis, and conclusions; and
( iii ) The terms of any repayment schedules, or the date salary offset will commence, if applicable.
( 6 ) Failure to appear. In the absence of good cause shown (e.g., excused illness), an employee who fails to appear at an oral hearing shall be deemed, for the purpose of this part, to admit the existence and amount of the debt as described in the notice of intent. The hearing official shall schedule a new hearing date upon the request of MCC's representative when good cause is shown.
( d ) A hearing official's decision is considered to be an official certification regarding the existence and amount of the debt for purposes of executing salary offset under 5 U.S.C. 5514 only.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SHERRI SILVER HALL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, 

Respondent. 

No. 67799 

FILED 

MAR 1 0 2016 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

DEPUTY 

BY ten*, ci

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause 

appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs 

and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). The injunction issued in our June 9, 

2015, order is hereby dissolved. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Inc. 

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Christopher Connell 

(0) 1947A q3
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Brillian
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Wayne A. Pratt, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Wayne A. PrattWayne A. PrattVice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Secretary, and TreasurerMay 14, 2004
§ 38.253 Additional requirements for cash-settled contracts. ( a ) For cash-settled contracts, the designated contract market must demonstrate that it: ( 1 ) Monitors the pricing of the index to which the contract will be settled; and
( 2 ) Monitors the continued appropriateness of the methodology for deriving the index and makes a good-faith effort to resolve conditions, including amending contract terms where necessary, where there is a threat of market manipulation, disruptions, or distortions.
( b ) If a contract listed on a designated contract market is settled by reference to the price of a contract or commodity traded in another venue, including a price or index derived from prices on another designated contract market, the designated contract market must have rules or agreements that allow the designated contract market access to information on the activities of its traders in the reference market.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                      [Drew Field,, P.L. LETTERHEAD]

December 18, 1997
Board of Directors
Success Development International, Inc.
9799 Old St. Augustine Road
Jacksonville, Florida 32257

Dear Directors:

        You have requested my opinion as to the legality of the securities being
registered by Success Development International, Inc. (the Company) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), by filing a registration statement
on Form SB-2, relating to the offering of up to 500,000 shares of its common
stock a (the Shares) as described in the registration statement.

        In connection with your request for my opinion, you have provided me and
I have reviewed the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, bylaws,
resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company concerning the offering,
the registration statement and such other corporate documents as I have
considered necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

        Upon the basis of such examination, it is my opinion that, when the
registration statement shall have become effective under the Act, and when the
payment of the consideration therefor, the Shares will, when sold, be legally
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the registration
statement.

Very truly yours,

By
DREW FIELD
#### § 270.8b-13 Preparation of registration statement or report.

The registration statement or report shall contain the numbers and captions of all items of the appropriate form, but the text of the items may be omitted provided the answers thereto are so prepared as to indicate to the reader the coverage of the items without the necessity of his referring to the text of the items or instructions thereto. However, where any item requires information to be given in tabular form, it shall be given in substantially the tabular form specified in the item. All instructions, whether appearing under the items of the form or elsewhere therein, are to be omitted from the registration statement or report. Unless expressly provided otherwise, if any item is inapplicable or the answer thereto is in the negative, an appropriate statement to that effect shall be made.

[18 FR 8576, Dec. 19, 1953]