alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Jerome Josefson, an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

March 20, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Nicholas C. Cooper (Peter F. Tortorici*and *Edward H. Albert*of counsel), for petitioner.

*544OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 19, 1957. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report.

The reporting Justice sustained all of the allegations of professional misconduct against respondent including the following charges: (1) failing to co-operate with petitioner and the Brooklyn Bar Association in their respective investigations of seven complaints made concerning him; (2) while acting as attorney for his two partners in a business venture, he provided them with false information in order to further his personal interest to the detriment of his partners and commingled partnership funds in accounts not pertaining to the partnership; (3) grossly neglecting and prejudicing the interests of a client and concealing his neglect by misrepresenting facts to his client; (4) after being retained to handle an estate, he failed to probate the will, failed to move for an order fixing the New York estate tax and failed to file the Federal estate tax return; and (5) neglecting a client’s interest resulting in a default judgment being entered against his client in the amount of $6,294.30.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the findings of the Referee. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to affirm the Referee’s report is granted.

The respondent is adjudged guilty of serious professional misconduct and should be, and he hereby is, disbarred from further practice of law, and his name is ordered removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Hargett, JJ., concur.
# Úradný vestník L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0790 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | L 198 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Právne predpisy | Ročník 616. augusta 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0790

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

L 198

Slovenské vydanie

Právne predpisy

Ročník 616. augusta 2018

---

| Obsah | | II   Nelegislatívne akty | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | MEDZINÁRODNÉ DOHODY |
| | * | Oznámenie o nadobudnutí platnosti Protokolu medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Libanonskou republikou, ktorým sa zriaďuje mechanizmus urovnávania sporov uplatniteľný na spory podľa ustanovení o obchode Euro-stredomorskej dohody o pridružení medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a jeho členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Libanonskou republikou na strane druhej | 1 |

Obsah

II   Nelegislatívne akty

Strana

MEDZINÁRODNÉ DOHODY

*

Oznámenie o nadobudnutí platnosti Protokolu medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Libanonskou republikou, ktorým sa zriaďuje mechanizmus urovnávania sporov uplatniteľný na spory podľa ustanovení o obchode Euro-stredomorskej dohody o pridružení medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a jeho členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Libanonskou republikou na strane druhej

1

| SK | Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.
  Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička. |
| --- | --- |

SK

Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.

Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička.

---

II Nelegislatívne akty

MEDZINÁRODNÉ DOHODY

| 6.8.2018 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | L 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2018

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

L 198/1

---

Oznámenie o nadobudnutí platnosti Protokolu medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Libanonskou republikou, ktorým sa zriaďuje mechanizmus urovnávania sporov uplatniteľný na spory podľa ustanovení o obchode Euro-stredomorskej dohody o pridružení medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a jeho členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Libanonskou republikou na strane druhej

Protokol medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a Libanonskou republikou, ktorým sa zriaďuje mechanizmus urovnávania sporov uplatniteľný na spory podľa ustanovení o obchode Euro-stredomorskej dohody o pridružení medzi Európskym spoločenstvom a jeho členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Libanonskou republikou na strane druhej, ktorý bol podpísaný 11. novembra 2010 v Bruseli, nadobúda podľa jeho článku 23 platnosť 1. septembra 2018.

---
S U B A R C T I C

P L A I N S

G R E A T

B A S I N

S O U T H W E S T

A R C T I C

N O R T H W E S T C O A S T

C A L I F O R N I A

P L A T E A U

Map 3-11

Native Areas of Western North America

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Miles

3-93
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Brian Chuchua*, et al., (S.D. Cal.), 3:01CV1479 DMS (AJB), was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on November 8, 2004.                

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Brian Chuchua pursuant to section 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring Defendant Brian Chuchua to mitigate the environmental impacts by purchasing mitigation credits at the Pilgrim Creek Mitigation Bank and to pay a civil penalty.

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Pamela S. Tonglao, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, DC 20026-3986 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Brian Chuchua*                     et al., (S.D. Cal.) 3:01CV1479 DMS (AJB), DJ #90-5-1-1-1611.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html*.                

Stephen Samuels,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26117  Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Compressors/Engines 

Dehydrators 

Pipelines 

Pneumatics/Controls 

Tanks 

Valves 

Wells 

Other 

PRO Fact Sheet No. 703 

Green Completions 

Partner Reported Opportunities (PROs) 

for Reducing Methane Emissions 

Technology/Practice Overview 

Description 

When gas wells are drilled, a final step before producing the 

natural gas to a sales line is to “clean-up” the well-bore and 

reservoir immediately surrounding the well. Traditionally this 

well completion step involves producing the well to open 

pits or tankage where sand, cuttings, and reservoir fluids 

are collected for disposal and the produced natural gas is 

vented to the atmosphere. 

Partners reported using a “green completion” method in 

which equipment is brought on site to clean up the gas 

sufficiently for delivery to sales. The additional equipment 

may include considerably more tankage, special gas-liquidsand separator traps, and portable gas dehydration. In addition to reducing methane emissions, green completions produce 

an immediate revenue stream with the produced natural gas and gas liquids, less solid waste and water pollution, and a 

safer operating practice. 

Operating Requirements 

Sales line connection and sales agreements need to be arranged before the well drilling is completed. 

Applicability 

This applies to the drilling of all natural gas wells. 

Methane Emissions Reductions 

The methane emissions reduction is estimated as the total recovered from 63 wells reported by a partner. This partner 

reported natural gas emissions reduction of 7,410 Mcf per year, which is 70 percent of the gas formerly vented to the 

atmosphere. 

Applicable sector(s): 

Production Processing Transmission and Distribution 

Partners reporting this PRO: BP, ConocoPhillips Company 

Other related PROs: Install Downhole Separator Pumps, Connect Casing to VRU, Install 

Compressors to Capture Casinghead Gas 

Methane Savings: 7,000 Mcf per year 

Costs 

Capital Costs (including installation) 

<$1,000 $1,000 – $10,000 >$10,000 

Operating and Maintenance Costs (annual) 

<$100 $100-$1,000 >$1,000 

Payback (Years) 

0–1 1–3 3–10 >10 

Benefits 

Reducing methane emissions was the primary benefit of the project. 
Economic Analysis 

Basis for Costs and Savings 

Methane savings of 7,000 Mcf per year are based on completing 60 wells per year at the average 

recovery reported by the partner. The partner also reported recovering a total of 156 barrels of 

condensate from the 63 wells, an average of 2.5 barrels per well. 

Discussion 

The capital cost includes additional portable separators, sand traps, and tanks at a cost reported 

by the partner of $180,000. This equipment would be moved from well-to-well, so amortizing the 

cost over 10 years and doing 60 wells per year, the annual capital charges would be under $10,000. 

Incremental operating costs are assumed to be over $1,000 per year. At a natural gas price of 

$3 per Mcf and condensate price of $19 per barrel, green completions will pay back the costs 

in about 1 year. 

Last updated: September 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JONATHAN JIMENEZ, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, 

District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-sgw-mfu-6) 

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jonathan Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jonathan Jimenez appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jimenez, 

No. 5:01-cr-30058-sgw-mfu-6 (W.D. Va. March 26, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
No. 272.

#### Reeves Brothers Co. *v.*United States.

May 17, 1937.

299 U. S. 573.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee 05-35, 
Review of R03s, Fs, Ks
    Date: February 17-18, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Lynn Mertens King, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, 45 Center Dr., Rm 4AN-32F, 
National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes 
of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6402, (301) 594-5006, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#533f2a3d3d7d383a3d34133d3a3b7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda1b4a3a3e3a6a4a3aa8da3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27499 Filed 12-04-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### §§ 1701.152-1701.159 [Reserved]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4250 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 3-year extension 

of the exclusion of income from the discharge of indebtedness on qualified 

principal residences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2012 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a 3-year extension of the exclusion of income from the 

discharge of indebtedness on qualified principal residences. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3–YEAR EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION OF INCOME 

4 FROM DISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS ON 

5 QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES. 

6 (a) EXTENSION.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

7 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:35 Mar 23, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4250.IH H4250

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4250 IH

1 ed by striking ‘‘January 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

2 1, 2016’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to discharges of indebtedness oc5 curring after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §2297h–6. Transfer of contracts

#### (a) Transfer of contracts

Concurrent with privatization, the Corporation shall transfer to the private corporation all contracts, agreements, and leases, including all uranium enrichment contracts, that were—

(1) transferred by the Secretary to the Corporation pursuant to section 2297c(b) of this title, or

(2) entered into by the Corporation before the privatization date.

#### (b) Nontransferable power contracts

The Corporation shall transfer to the private corporation the right to purchase power from the Secretary under the power purchase contracts for the gaseous diffusion plants executed by the Secretary before July 1, 1993. The Secretary shall continue to receive power for the gaseous diffusion plants under such contracts and shall continue to resell such power to the private corporation at cost during the term of such contracts.

#### (c) Effect of transfer

(1) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the United States shall remain obligated to the parties to the contracts, agreements, and leases transferred under subsection (a) for the performance of its obligations under such contracts, agreements, or leases during their terms. Performance of such obligations by the private corporation shall be considered performance by the United States.

(2) If a contract, agreement, or lease transferred under subsection (a) is terminated, extended, or materially amended after the privatization date—

(A) the private corporation shall be responsible for any obligation arising under such contract, agreement, or lease after any extension or material amendment, and

(B) the United States shall be responsible for any obligation arising under the contract, agreement, or lease before the termination, extension, or material amendment.

(3) The private corporation shall reimburse the United States for any amount paid by the United States under a settlement agreement entered into with the consent of the private corporation or under a judgment, if the settlement or judgment—

(A) arises out of an obligation under a contract, agreement, or lease transferred under subsection (a), and

(B) arises out of actions of the private corporation between the privatization date and the date of a termination, extension, or material amendment of such contract, agreement, or lease.

#### (d) Pricing

The Corporation may establish prices for its products, materials, and services provided to customers on a basis that will allow it to attain the normal business objectives of a profit making corporation.

(Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3108, Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–339.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the USEC Privatization Act and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
#### § 123.20 [Reserved]
#### § 1506.17 For what purposes may USADF use my mailing address?

When attempting to locate a debtor in order to collect or compromise a debt, USADF may obtain the debtor's mailing address from the Internal Revenue Service. Addresses obtained from the Internal Revenue Service will be used by USADF, its officers, employees, agents or contractors and other Federal agencies only to collect or dispose of debts, and may be disclosed to other agencies and to collection agencies only for collection purposes.
### §15521. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15521 was editorially reclassified as section 21121 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### Before State Industrial Commission, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of William Flanagan, Claimant, Respondent, for Compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, v. Jones Brothers, Employer, and the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, Insurance Carrier, Appellants.

Remitted to the Commission for further hearing and findings.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20890 Conference Calendar

__________________ KAAZIM ABUL UMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus ROBERT MCVEA; KEITH L. STEELE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-1443
- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kaazim Abul Umar, a/k/a Wesley Lynn Pittman, appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint as improvidently filed. He argues that the district court abused its discretion and denied him access to the courts by applying its policy of enforcing sanctions imposed by other Texas federal district courts. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion, and appellant's brief and discern no reversible error. Further,No. 95-20890 -2- we hold that Umar's appeal is frivolous, and, accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Umar was warned in Pittman v. Shaw , No. 94-41262 (5th Cir. Oct. 19, 1995) that additional frivolous appeals would result in the imposition of sanctions. Umar is hereby BARRED from filing any pro se , in forma pauperis , civil appeal in this court, or any pro se , in forma pauperis , initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Umar, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Granting Leave To File Permanently Under Seal Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI 

4

 JEFFREY K. COMPTON

 WILLIAM A. BAIRD 

 Markun Zusman & Compton LLP 

 STEVE ELSTER 

 Law Office of Steve Elster

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS 

DATE: January 28, 2010 By: __/S/ James E. Boddy____

 LINDA E. SHOSTAK. 

 JAMES E. BODDY, JR. 

 Morrison & Foerster LLP 

ECF CERTIFICATION 

 I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from 

each of the signatories within the e-filed document. 

DATE: January 29, 2010 By: _/S/ Daria D. Carlson_____

 Daria Dub Carlson 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________ ____________________________ 

 Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-00177-SI Document 110 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 1