alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1203.735-305 Gifts, entertainment, and favors. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a special Government employee, while so employed or in connection with Government employment, shall not receive or solicit from a person having business with the employee's agency anything of value as a gift, gratuity, loan, entertainment, or favor for the employee or another person, particularly one with whom the employee has family, business or financial ties.
( b ) The exceptions to the prohibition against the acceptance of gifts which have been granted to employees in § 1203.735-202 (b), (c), and (d) are also applicable to special Government employees.
( c ) A special Government employee shall not accept a gift, present, decoration, or other thing from a foreign government unless authorized by Congress as provided by the Constitution and in 5 U.S.C. 7342, and the regulations promulgated thereunder pursuant to E.O. 11320; 31 FR 15789. These regulations are set forth in part 3 of this title (as added, 32 FR 6569, April 28, 1967), and in 3 FAM 621.
( d ) A special Government employee shall avoid any action, whether or not specifically prohibited by these sections on special Government employees, which might result in, or create the appearance of: ( 1 ) Using public office for private gain;
( 2 ) Giving preferential treatment to any person;
( 3 ) Impeding Government efficiency or economy;
( 4 ) Losing independence or impartiality;
( 5 ) Making a Government decision outside official channels; or
( 6 ) Affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph Frattaroli, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

November 14, 2006

By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
   -----------------------
Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)


      This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
CLD-031 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 15-2174

___________

JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY,

 Appellant

v.

THE SUPER-RICH MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI, (Bilderberg Group); 

B.R. JETT, Hon. Warden, et al.; 

POPE; OBAMA; BIDEN

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.N.J. 1-15-cv-01869)

District Court Judge: Honorable Noel L. Hillman

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 29, 2015

Before: FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 16, 2015)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

Joaquin Foy, a federal inmate at the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, 

Minnesota, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the 

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court summarily 

dismissed his petition. Although Foy did not identify the conviction or commitment he 

was attempting to challenge, the District Court found that Foy suffered convictions in the 

United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Western 

District of Missouri, but that he had not been convicted or sentenced in the District of 

New Jersey. The District Court evidently treated Foy’s petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

motion and dismissed it because Foy did not seek to challenge a judgment from a United 

States District Court in the District of New Jersey. Foy appeals. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s dismissal 

order. See United States v. Friedland, 83 F.3d 1531, 1542 (3d Cir. 1996). We may 

summarily affirm if the appeal presents no substantial questions. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 

27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.

The District Court correctly dismissed Foy’s petition. The proper venue for a § 

2241 petition lies in the prisoner’s district of confinement. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 

426, 443 (2004). For Foy, that district is the District of Minnesota. Because Foy filed his 

§ 2241 petition in the District of New Jersey, the District Court lacked jurisdiction. See

id.

We note that the District Court did not expressly address the possibility of 

transferring Foy’s habeas petition to the District of Minnesota or construing it as a § 2255 
3

motion and transferring it to one of the courts that had convicted him. Such a transfer 

would be appropriate if it were “in the interest of justice.” 28 U.S.C. § 1631. A review 

of the record—including Foy’s instant habeas petition, his pro se brief, and the other 

habeas petitions he filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania—reveals that the interests 

of justice would not be served by transferring Foy’s § 2241 petition. 

Accordingly, we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court.
3442.7101 Policy and clause.       (a) It is the policy of the Department that all meetings, conferences, and seminars be accessible to persons with disabilities.          (b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.242–73 (Accessibility of meetings, conferences, and seminars to persons with disabilities) in all solicitations and contracts where conferences are contemplated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3442.71—Accessibility of Meetings, Conferences, and Seminars to Persons With Disabilities
#### In the Matter of Felix A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Order of disposition by the Family Court, Bronx County, entered in the office of the clerk June 21, 1976, which placed appellant in a title III facility (Bronx State Psychiatric Center), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the prior proceedings vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings *de novo.*The sparse *record does not*disclose that appellant was advised *563of his right to remain silent at the commencement of the fact-finding hearing (Family Ct Act, § 741) or that he was questioned by the trial court as to any of the facts alleged in the petition *(Matter of Lee G.,*46 AD2d 910). Concur — Birns, J. P., Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carmine Stella, certify that:





1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage Corporation.;





2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:





a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.              I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:





a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.              I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date:  November 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Carmine N. StellaCarmine N. StellaPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 38.157 Real-time market monitoring.

A designated contract market must conduct real-time market monitoring of all trading activity on its electronic trading platform(s) to identify disorderly trading and any market or system anomalies. A designated contract market must have the authority to adjust trade prices or cancel trades when necessary to mitigate market disrupting events caused by malfunctions in its electronic trading platform(s) or errors in orders submitted by members and market participants. Any trade price adjustments or trade cancellations must be transparent to the market and subject to standards that are clear, fair, and publicly available.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1305 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-041-AD 

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (Eurocopter) Model BO-105A, BO-105C, 

BO-105S, BO-105LS A-1, BO-105LS A-3, EC135 P1, EC135 P2, EC135 P2+, EC135 T1, 

EC135 T2, EC135 T2+, MBB-BK 117 A-1, MBB-BK 117 A-3, MBB-BK 117 A-4, MBB-BK 

117 B-1, MBB-BK 117 B-2, MBB-BK 117 C-1, and MBB-BK 117 C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 416 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a pilot taking off with the cyclic in the 

locked position, which could result in loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $0

Labor per Helicopter

(.5 work-hour x $85/workhour for the modification)

$43

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $43

Total US Fleet Cost $17,680

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Jim Grigg
## VIRGINIA:

**In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the**

**City of Richmond on Thursday**  **the 20th**  **day of May**  **, 20 21** 

**.**

Present: Lemons, C.J., and Goodwyn, Mims, Powell, Kelsey, and McCullough, JJ., and Koontz,

S.J.

Karen Rompalo

, Appellant,

against Record No. 200941

Court of Appeals No. 1717

- 18

- 4

Commonwealth of Virginia

, Appellee.

U pon an appeal from a judgment

rendered by the Court of Appeals of

Virginia

.

In this case, we awarded Karen Rompalo an appeal from the judgment of the Court of

Appeals , which affirmed her convictions on three counts of destroying a public record in

violation of Code § 18.2

- 107. See Rompalo v. Commonwealth , 72 Va. Ap p. 147 (2020).

We have considered the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, and for the reasons

stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment.

This order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and to the Circ uit Court

of Fairfax County and shall be published in the Virginia Reports

.

A Copy,

Teste:

Douglas B. Robelen, Clerk

By:

Deputy Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commerical property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Research Project (R01).                    

*Date:*                         January 18, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yan Z Wang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4957,                         *wangy1@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 71826)    
Dated: December 6, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-27115  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
WILLIAM NATHANIEL TAYLOR, JR.

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5 379

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee ; and Willia m Nathaniel Taylor, Jr., pro se , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to our recent decision in Taylor v. State , 140 So. 3d 1149 (Fla . 1s t

DCA 2014), the conviction for which the appellant was sentenced to probation was

reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial. Accordingly, the judgment andsentence being appealed herein, which was imposed upon revocation of probation,

is R EVERSED

.
ROBERTS, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 3, 2018

No. 04-18-00241-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.E.P., et al.,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA00213

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s amended motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to July 23, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: ALLIED Property and 
Casualty Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2004 Revision, published July 1, 2004, at 69 FR 40224.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-1661.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued to the following Company under 
31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate 
their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2004 Revision, on 
page 40226 to reflect this action:
    Company Name: ALLIED Property and casualty Insurance Company.
    Business Address: 1100 Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50391-1100.
    Phone: (515) 508-4211. Underwriting Limitation b/: $8,132,00.
    Surety Licenses.: AZ, CA, FL, GA, ID, IL IN, IA, KS, KY, MI, MO, 
MT, NE, NV, NM, ND, OH, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WY.
    Incorporated in Iowa.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard copy may be purchased from the 
Government Printing Office (GPO) Subscription Service, Washington, DC, 
and Telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use 
the following stock number. 769-004-04926-1.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F07, Hyattsville, Md 20782.

    Dated: December 3, 2004.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 04-27176 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

**                                               **In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux Corn Processors,L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Stephen Roe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|     | /s/  Stephen Roe                         |
|----------|------------------------------------------|
|     | Stephen  Roe                             |
| * * | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|     |                                     |
|     | Dated:  May 15, 2008                |

 

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.400 What are my responsibilities as a Department of State awarding official? As a Department of State awarding official, you must obtain each recipient's agreement, as a condition of the award, to comply with the requirements in— ( a ) Subpart B of this part, if the recipient is not an individual; or
( b ) Subpart C of this part, if the recipient is an individual.