alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75078-75079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

[CBP Decision 04-41]


CBP Decisions; Application for Recordation of Trade Name: 
``Precision Instrument Manifolds''

ACTION: Notice of application for recordation of trade name.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Application has been filed pursuant to Sec.  133.12, Customs 
Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for recordation under section 42 of the 
Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name 
``PRECISION INSTRUMENT MANIFOLDS,'' used by DYNAMIC Controls & Sensors, 
Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, 
located at P.O. Box 5009 Kingwood, Texas 77325.
    The application states that the trade name is used in connection 
with valves.
    Before final action is taken on the application, consideration will 
be given to any relevant data, views, or

[[Page 75079]]

arguments submitted in writing by any person in opposition to the 
recordation of this trade name. Notice of the action taken on the 
application for recordation of this trade name will be published in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protections, Attention: Office of Regulations and Rulings, 
Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
(Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delois P. Johnson, Paralegal, 
Intellectual Property Rights Branch, at (202) 572-8703.

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
George Frederick McCray,
Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.
[FR Doc. 04-27419 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
### §2000c–3. Training institutes; stipends; travel allowances

The Secretary is authorized to arrange, through grants or contracts, with institutions of higher education for the operation of short-term or regular session institutes for special training designed to improve the ability of teachers, supervisors, counselors, and other elementary or secondary school personnel to deal effectively with special educational problems occasioned by desegregation. Individuals who attend such an institute on a full-time basis may be paid stipends for the period of their attendance at such institute in amounts specified by the Secretary in regulations, including allowances for travel to attend such institute.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title IV, §404, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 247; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(1), title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary", meaning the Secretary of Education, substituted in text for "Commissioner" pursuant to sections 301(a)(1) and 507 of Pub. L. 96–88, which are classified to sections 3441(a)(1) and 3507 of Title 20, Education, and which transferred all functions of Commissioner of Education to Secretary of Education.
### §2233. Terms of licenses

Each license shall be in such form and contain such terms and conditions as the Commission may, by rule or regulation, prescribe to effectuate the provisions of this chapter, including the following provisions:

(a) Repealed. Pub. L. 88–489, §18, Aug. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 607.

(b) No right to the special nuclear material shall be conferred by the license except as defined by the license.

(c) Neither the license nor any right under the license shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the provisions of this chapter.

(d) Every license issued under this chapter shall be subject to the right of recapture or control reserved by section 2138 of this title, and to all of the other provisions of this chapter, now or hereafter in effect and to all valid rules and regulations of the Commission.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §183, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 954; amended Pub. L. 88–489, §18, Aug. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 607; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1964—Par. (a). Pub. L. 88–489 struck out par. (a) which placed title to all special nuclear material utilized or produced by facilities pursuant to license in the United States at all times.
#### § 1429.22 Additional time after service by mail.

Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act pursuant to this subchapter within a prescribed period after service of a notice or other paper upon such party, and the notice or paper is served on such party by mail, five (5) days shall be added to the prescribed period.
#### § 16.15 Judicial review.

Any aggrieved party may obtain judicial review of these regulations, and revisions thereto, and final actions of the agency head (or designee) or the Grievance Board hereunder, in the District Courts of the United States, in accordance with the standards set forth in chapter 7 of title 5 of the United States Code. Section 706 of title 5 shall apply without limitation or exception.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carmine Stella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  August 23, 2004                  /s/Carmine Stella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carmine Stella
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4222 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of certain land inholdings 

owned by the United States to the Tucson Unified School 

District and to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4222 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pascua Yaqui Tribe 

3 Trust Land Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 For the purposes of this Act, the following definitions 

6 apply: 

7 (1) DISTRICT.—The term ‘‘District’’ means the 

8 Tucson Unified School District, a school district rec9 ognized as such under the laws of the State of Ari10 zona. 

11 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map ti12 tled ‘‘Pascua Yaqui Tribe Trust Land Act’’ and 

13 dated April 23, 2012. 

14 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

15 the Secretary of the Interior. 

16 (4) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the 

17 Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, a federally recog18 nized Indian tribe. 

19 SEC. 3. LANDS TO BE HELD IN TRUST. 

20 (a) PARCEL A.—Subject to valid existing rights, all 

21 right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 

22 the Federal lands of approximately 10 acres shown on the 

23 map as Parcel A are declared held in trust by the United 

24 States for the benefit of the Tribe. 

25 (b) PARCEL B.—Immediately upon the Secretary’s 

26 receipt from the District of the abandonment of its 
3 

•HR 4222 EH

1 possessory interest of the lands of approximately 10 acres 

2 shown on the map as Parcel B, subject to valid existing 

3 rights, all right, title, and interest of the United States 

4 in and to the Federal lands shown on the map as Parcel 

5 B are declared held in trust by the United States for the 

6 benefit of the Tribe. 

7 SEC. 4. GAMING PROHIBITION. 

8 The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities on the 

9 lands held in trust under this Act, as a matter of claimed 

10 inherent authority or under the authority of any Federal 

11 law, including the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 

12 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations thereunder 

13 promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian 

14 Gaming Commission. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4222 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of certain land 

purposes. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, and for other Tucson Unified School District and to the inholdings owned by the United States to the
The DJI S10 00 manual is too large for upload to regulations.gov. Therefore, if interested, please

follow the link below to the assembly and operating manual for the sUAS. http://www.dji.com/product/spreading - wings - s1000/download
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6311

ELMER K. FLOYD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-437-3) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elmer K. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000). 2 PER CURIAM:Elmer Floyd appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Floyd v. Baskerville , No. CA00-437-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 1002.1 Introduction. ( a ) It is the policy of the Inter-American Foundation that information about its operations, procedures, and records be freely available to the public in accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) The Foundation will make the fullest possible disclosure of its information and identifiable records consistent with the provisions of this Act and the regulations in this part.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0597 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CAVEY LITTLE ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 2 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 26 2023

06/26/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0597
#### § 229.306 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nicholas Valentine, Appellant, against Warden of Great Meadows Correctional Institution, Respondent.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. The appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40384

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANTONIO TORRES-VARGAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-1011-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio 

Torres-Vargas (Torres) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief 

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40384 Document: 00512473603 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40384

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40384 Document: 00512473603 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
(No. 39859.

#### Peoria Oasis, Inc., Appellant, *vs.*The Industrial Commission *et al.*— (William E. McDonald, Appellee.)

*Opinion filed Sept. 23, 1966.*

Rehearing *denied Oct. 27, 1966.*

Cassidy, Cassidy, Quinn & Lindhold, of Peoria, (John E. Cassidy, Sr., of counsel,) for appellant.

Swain, Johnson & Card, of Peoria, for appellee.

Mr. Justice House

delivered the opinion of the court:

*473This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Peoria County affirming an award for permanent total disability suffered from gunshot wounds.

The sole question is whether the petitioner was injured out of or in the course of his employment. He was an employee of Peoria Oasis, Inc., which operated a late closing night club or strip-tease emporium, was originally hired as a handy man, and had worked there about a month in various capacities, including “bouncer” and sometimes bartender. He later was given a key and there was testimony that he acted as manager in the absence of the owner. There was evidence that petitioner had made arrangements to take off the night he suffered the injuries and asked another to work for him so that he could attend a wedding. He did go to the club that night. Petitioner and some witnesses testified that he was there with a friend only as a guest while others said that he helped the bartender when a waitress failed to appear for work. There also was evidence that some of the other employees were told to say that petitioner was not, in fact, working that night, although that was not true of all.

The question of whether the petitioner was acting in the capacity of an employee at the time of the injury was one of fact to be decided by the Industrial Commission. Its findings will not be disturbed unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. *(United States Steel Corp.*v. *Industrial Com.*32 Ill.2d 68; *Beck*v. *Industrial Com.*32 Ill.2d 148.) When the evidence is conflicting or susceptible of different reasonable inferences, as here, it will not be disturbed on judicial review. *(Johnson & Johnson*v. *Industrial Com.*32 Ill.2d 316; *Huddleston*v. *Industrial Com.*27 Ill.2d 446.) We are not justified in interfering in this case.

The judgment of the circuit court of Peoria County is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 1508.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate suspension and debarment actions?

Yes, when more than one Federal agency has an interest in a suspension or debarment, the agencies may consider designating one agency as the lead agency for making the decision. Agencies are encouraged to establish methods and procedures for coordinating their suspension and debarment actions.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Capital  Beverage  Corporation  (the
Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carol
Russell,  Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/Carol Russell

Carol Russell
Treasurer
August 19, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (04-136)]


Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 1 et seq.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a 
NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Strategic Roadmap Committee is 
necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance 
of duties imposed upon NASA by law. This determination follows 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Strategic 
Roadmap Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The Committee will advise the NASA 
Administrator on exploring the Sun-Earth system to understand the Sun 
and its effects on Earth, the solar system, and the space environmental 
conditions that will be experienced by human explorers. The Committee 
will draw on the expertise of its members and other sources to provide 
its advice and recommendations to the Agency. The Committee will hold 
meetings and make site visits as necessary to accomplish their 
responsibilities. The Committee will function solely as an advisory 
board and will comply fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.
    Lack of Duplication of Resources: The Committee's functions cannot 
be performed by the agency, another existing committee, or other means 
such as a public meeting.
    Fairly Balanced Membership: The Committee will consist of a balance 
of experts from within the government, private industry, and academia. 
In addition, there may be additional experts selected for Subcommittees 
or Task Forces. Members of the Committee, Subcommittee or Task Forces 
will be chosen from among industry, academia, and government with 
recognized knowledge and expertise in specific areas across the NASA 
portfolio. Total membership will reflect a fairly balanced view.
    Duration: Ad hoc.
    Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Marc Allen, Advanced Planning and 
Integration Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546, telephone (202) 358-2373.

    Dated:
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26965 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
§ 1006.880 What factors may influence the debarring official during reconsideration? The debarring official may reduce or terminate your debarment based on— ( a ) Newly discovered material evidence;
( b ) A reversal of the conviction or civil judgment upon which your debarment was based;
( c ) A bona fide change in ownership or management;
( d ) Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or
( e ) Other reasons the debarring official finds appropriate.