alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1347. LEVERETT v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N. A.

This appeal was docketed on March 20, 2014 and Appellant’s brief was due for

filing on April 9, 2014. Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). Based upon Appellant’s failure

to file any brief in this case, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/29/2014

July 29, 2014
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006              /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Women's Business Council

In accordance with the Women's Business Ownership Act, Public Law 106-554 as amended, the National Women's Business Council (NWBC) would like to announce a forthcoming Council meeting. The meeting will introduce the National Women's Business Council's agenda and action items for fiscal year 2005, included and not limited to procurement, access to capital, access to training and technical assistance, access to markets and affordable health care. 

# Date:

Tuesday, January 18, 2005. 

# Address:

The Small Business Administration, Eisenhower Conference Room, 409 3rd Street, SW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC. 

# Time:

9 a.m. to 1 p.m. 

# Status:

Open to the public. Attendance by RSVP only. 

# Contact:

National Women's Business Council, (202) 205-3850—Katherine Stanley. 

Anyone wishing to attend or would like to make an oral presentation at the meeting must contact Katherine Stanley, at (202) 205-6695, no later than Monday, January 10, 2005. 

Matthew K. Becker, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-27616 Filed 12-14-04; 10:23 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 213.8 Written demand for payment notice. ( a ) When an Agency official determines that a debt is owed to USAID, the Agency sends a written demand for payment notice to the debtor. Unless otherwise provided by agreement, contract, or order, the written demand for payment notice informs the debtor of: ( 1 ) The amount, nature and basis of the debt;
( 2 ) The right of the debtor to inspect and copy records related to the debt;
( 3 ) The right of the debtor to discuss and propose a repayment agreement;
( 4 ) Any rights available to the debtor to review the debt, or to have recovery of the debt waived (by citing the available review or waiver authority, the conditions for review or waiver, and the effects of the review or waiver request on the collection of the debt);
( 5 ) The date on which debt payment is due, which will be not more than 30 days from the date the written demand for-payment notice is mailed or hand delivered;
( 6 ) The instructions for making electronic payment;
( 7 ) The debt is considered delinquent if it is not paid on the due date provided in the initial written demand-of payment notice;
( 8 ) The imposition of interest charges, penalties, and administrative costs that USAID may assess against a delinquent debt, and the date when such charges apply;
( 9 ) The intention of USAID to use non-centralized administrative offset to collect the debt if appropriate and, if not, the referral of the debt 90 days after the Bill for Collection or demand letter to the Financial Management Service in the Department of Treasury who will collect their administrative costs from the debtor in addition to the amount owed USAID and use all means available to the Federal Government for debt collection including administrative wage garnishment, use of collection agencies and reporting the indebtedness to a credit reporting bureau (see § 213.14);
( 10 ) The Agency will refer delinquent debt unpaid at 90 days from the initial written demand for payment notice to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Statute requires the referral of delinquent debt to Fiscal Service no later than 120 days from the initial written demand-for-payment notice. Fiscal Service will use means available to the Federal Government for collecting a debt, including administrative wage-garnishment, the use of collection agencies, and reporting the indebtedness to a credit-reporting bureau (see § 213.15);
( 11 ) The address, telephone number, and name of the person available to discuss the debt; and
( 12 ) The possibility of referral to DOJ for litigation if USAID cannot collect the debt administratively.
( b ) USAID will respond promptly to written communications from the debtor, generally within 30 days of receipt of such a communication.
[67 FR 47258, July 18, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 86 FR 31141, June 11, 2021]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, J. Nelson Happy, President, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ J. Nelson Happy
-----------------------
J. Nelson Happy
Date: November 19, 2002
#### Mary W. Mulcahy, appellee, v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of the City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,554.

Mandamus to compel the trustees of the Police Pension Fund to pay arrears of pension and payment of a pension in the future. Writ granted. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Timothy D. Hurley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 30, 1922.

Rehearing denied November 17, 1922.

Samuel A. Ettelson, for appellant; James W. Breen, of counsel. A. D. Gash, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
Case 3:08-cv-02338-TEH Document 17 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 19.9-3 Computation and payment of pension to former spouse. ( a ) A pension to a former spouse is paid monthly on the same date that annuity is paid to the principal.
( b ) No spousal agreement or court order may provide for a pension or any combination of pensions to former spouses of any one principal which exceeds the net annuity of the principal as defined in § 19.6-2(b).
( c ) A pension to a former spouse not fixed by a spousal agreement or court order shall equal the former spouse's pro rata share of 50 percent of the annuity to which the principal is entitled on the date the divorce becomes final, or, if not then entitled to an annuity, 50 percent of the annuity to which the principal first becomes entitled following that date. A pension to a former spouse of a disability annuitant shall be calculated on the basis of an annuity for which the participant would qualify if not disabled. A pension to a former spouse will be increased by the same percentage of each cost-of-living adjustment received by the principal.
( d ) The Department will initiate payment of a pension to a former spouse after complying with the notification and other procedures described in § 19.6.
( e ) If a pension can not be paid because a former spouse is missing, the principal may file an affidavit with PER/ER/RET that he/she does not know the whereabouts of the former spouse. In such an event, the principal and the Department will follow the procedures in § 19.11-4 in an effort to locate the former spouse. The annuity of the principal will be reduced by the amount of the pension to the former spouse even though the latter is not being paid. If the former spouse has not been located during the 12-month period following the date the principal files an affidavit under this section, the annuity of the principal will be recomputed effective from its commencing date (or on the date following the last month a pension payment was made to the former spouse) and paid without reduction of the amount of pension to the former spouse. If the former spouse subsequently is located, pension payments to him/her will be initiated at that time at the rate that would have been payable had they been paid continuously from the original effective date. The Department shall not be liable to make any pension payments to the former spouse for the missing period if the procedures under this section were faithfully complied with nor will the Department be responsible for recovering any payments made to the principal for the benefit of the former spouse.
### §2643. Increase of State or local expenditures

(a) No part of any allocation made by the President under this chapter shall be made available during any fiscal year to any State or local government for any public works project, unless the proposed or planned total expenditure (exclusive of Federal funds) of such State or local government during such fiscal year for all its capital improvement projects is increased by an amount approximately equal to the non-Federal funds required to be made available for such public works project.

(b) No part of any allocation made by the President under this chapter shall be made available for any planning or construction, directly or indirectly, of any school or other educational facility.

(Pub. L. 87–658, §4, Sept. 14, 1962, 76 Stat. 543.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1992 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         436,215
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  253,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               789,610
<PP&E>                                         302,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                (81,021)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,810,443
<BONDS>                                        479,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,318
<COMMON>                                       221,280
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,520,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,011,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,083,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,083,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CUNZHU ZHENG, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

YAHOO! INC., et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C 08-1068 MMC

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE CLAIMS AGAINST

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

By order filed December 28, 2009, the Court ordered plaintiffs to serve the remaining

defendant, the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), no later than January 20, 2010, and to

file proof of such service no later than January 27, 2010. Plaintiffs were advised that if they

did not file such proof of service by the deadline, the Court would dismiss plaintiffs’ claims

against the PRC without prejudice. To date, plaintiffs have not filed proof of service of the

summons and operative complaint on the PRC.

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ claims against the PRC are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice.

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-01068-MMC Document 98 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

On January 4, 2010, plaintiff Cunzhu Zheng (“Zheng”), proceeding pro se and

purportedly acting on behalf of himself and all other plaintiffs, filed an unsigned notice of

appeal from the Court’s December 2, 2009 order. “The filing of a notice of appeal generally

divests the district court of jurisdiction over the matters appealed.” Davis v. Unified States, 667 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1982). An order dismissing claims against some, but not all,

defendants, however, is not an appealable order. See Frank Briscoe Co. v.

Morrison-Knudsen Co., 776 F.2d 1414, 1416 (9th Cir.1985). Consequently, the Court will

“disregard the purported notice of appeal” from the order of December 2, 2009, and will

direct the Clerk to enter judgment. See Ruby v. Secretary of the U.S. Navy, 365 F.2d 385,

389 (9th Cir. 1966) (holding improper appeal does not deprive district court of jurisdiction).

2

Further, because the Court, by order filed December 2, 2009, dismissed plaintiffs’

claims against all other defendants, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to enter judgment

against plaintiffs and to close the file.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01068-MMC Document 98 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
# • SPA 12 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 99 Amendmentsto Interim Status Standards for Downgradient Ground-Water Monitoring Well Locations 56 FR66365-66369 December 23, 1991 (RCRACluster II, Non-HSWA)

STATE ANALOG IS: ANALOGOUS EQUIV· MORE BROADER' FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION I STATE CITATION I ALENT I STRINGENT I IN SCOPE ' PART260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL WAC 173-303
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS

t DEFINITIONS "qualified ground­ water scientist" 260.10 040 

# x PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF 

# • HAZARDOUSWASTETREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WAC 173-303 '
SUBPART F - GROUND-WATER MONITORING



### t GROUND-WATER MONITORING SYSTEM demonstrate alternate hydraulically downgradient monitoring well location will meet alternate criteria; inwriting and kept at facility; certified by qualified ground-water scientist and establish: 265.91<a)(3) 400(3)(a) 

# x existing physical obstacle prevents monitoring well installation at hydraulically downgradient limit of the waste 

# • . management area 265.91(a)(3)(i) 400(3)(a) 

## x

December 23, 1991 - Page 1 of 2 CL99.12· 1/29/92 IPmted:7/11/96)RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST99: Amendments to Interim Status Standards for Downgradient Ground-Water Monitoring Well Locations (cont'dl

STATE ANALOG IS: ANALOGOUS EQUN- MORE BROADER FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION STATE CITATION ! ALENT ! STRINGENT I IN SCOPE selected alternate downgradient location is as close to limit of waste management area as practical location ensures detection that, given alternate location, is as early as possible of any statistically significant amounts of hazardous waste or constituents that migrate from the waste management area to uppermost aquifer lateral expansion, new or replacement units not eligible for an alternate

.downgradient location 265.91(aH3Hii)

.400(3Ha) 

# x

265.91(aH3Hiii) 400(3)(a) 

## x

# C~

265.91(a)(3)(iv) 400(3)(a) 

# x



# .(j DecernberZd, 1991 --Page 2 of 2 CL99.12· 1/29/92 IPrintad:7/11/96)
### §18326. Development of technologies and in-space capabilities for beyond near-Earth space missions

#### (a) Development authorized

The Administrator may initiate activities to develop the following:

(1) Technologies identified as necessary elements of missions beyond low-Earth orbit.

(2) In-space capabilities such as refueling and storage technology, orbital transfer stages, innovative in-space propulsion technology, communications, and data management that facilitate a broad range of users (including military and commercial) and applications defining the architecture and design of such missions.

(3) Spacesuit development and associated life support technology.

(4) Flagship missions.

#### (b) Investments

In developing technologies and capabilities under subsection (a), the Administrator may make investments—

(1) in space technologies such as advanced propulsion, propellant depots, in situ resource utilization, and robotic payloads or capabilities that enable human missions beyond low-Earth orbit ultimately leading to Mars;

(2) in a space-based transfer vehicle including these technologies with an ability to conduct space-based operations that provide capabilities—

(A) to integrate with the Space Launch System and other space-based systems;

(B) to provide opportunities for in-space servicing of and delivery to multiple space-based platforms; and

(C) to facilitate international efforts to expand human presence to deep space destinations;

(3) in advanced life support technologies and capabilities;

(4) in technologies and capabilities relating to in-space power, propulsion, and energy systems;

(5) in technologies and capabilities relating to in-space propellant transfer and storage;

(6) in technologies and capabilities relating to in situ resource utilization; and

(7) in expanded research to understand the greatest biological impediments to human deep space missions, especially the radiation challenge.

#### (c) Utilization of ISS as testbed

The Administrator may utilize the ISS as a testbed for any technology or capability developed under subsection (a) in a manner consistent with the provisions of this chapter.

#### (d) Coordination

The Administrator shall coordinate development of technologies and capabilities under this section through an overall agency technology approach, as authorized by section 905 of this Act.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title III, §308, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2818.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 905 of this Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 111–267, title IX, §905, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2836, which is not classified to the Code.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                REDENVELOPE, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alison L. May,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify:, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ALISON L. MAY
------------------------------------
Alison L. May
Chief Executive Officer

February 8, 2005