alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF CHEMSYSTEMS, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0911

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OnNovember 23, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnNovember 6, 2012, Chemsystems, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing. On September4, 2014, Respondent asked to withdrawn its Request for Hearing. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "Atany time before or during

# a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw arequest for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or aparty withdraws the request for ahearingandthe answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed request to withdraw Request for Hearing having been read and considered, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's request to withdraw its Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and · 2. This proceeding be and is herebydismissedwith prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LISTBY US. MAIL & FAX


### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

Nancy Meikle, President ChemSystems, Inc., Respondent 101 01 Genard Road Houston, TX 77041 Robert Fling, Respondent's Counsel S. Robert Fling, PLLC. P.O. Box 411, Katy, TX 77492 5518 Fifth Street, Suite C Katy, TX 77493 TEL: 281-391-2003 FAX: 281-727-0082 

### ONE COPY

Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0911 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

3
§ 38.100 Core Principle 1. ( a ) *In general.* To be designated, and maintain a designation, as a contract market, a board of trade shall comply with: ( 1 ) Any core principle described in section 5(d) of the Act, and
( 2 ) Any requirement that the Commission may impose by rule or regulation pursuant to section 8a(5) of the Act.
( b ) *Reasonable discretion of the contract market.* Unless otherwise determined by the Commission by rule or regulation, a board of trade described in paragraph (a) of this section shall have reasonable discretion in establishing the manner in which the board of trade complies with the core principles described in this subsection.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 426 

To repeal certain incentives and subsidies for renewable fuels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal certain incentives and subsidies for renewable fuels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remove Incentives for 

5 Producing Ethanol Act of 2011’’ or the ‘‘RIPE Act of 

6 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD. 

8 Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 7545(o)) is repealed. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 426 IH

1 SEC. 3. IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF EXCISE TAX CREDIT 

2 FOR ALCOHOL FUEL MIXTURES. 

3 Sections 6426(b)(6) and 6427(e)(6)(A) of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking 

5 ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the en6 actment of the RIPE Act of 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 4. IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF INCOME TAX CREDIT 

8 FOR ALCOHOL USED AS FUEL. 

9 Paragraph (1) of section 40(e) of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘any sale or 

11 use—’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘any sale or use 

12 for any period after the date of the enactment of the RIPE 

13 Act of 2011.’’. 

14 SEC. 5. REMOVAL OF TARIFFS ON ETHANOL. 

15 (a) DUTY-FREE TREATMENT.—Chapter 98 of the 

16 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

17 amended by adding at the end the following new sub18 chapter: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 426 IH

‘‘Subchapter XXIII 

Alternative Fuels 

Heading/ 

Subheading 

Article Description 

Rates of Duty 

1 

2 

General Special 

9823.01.01 Ethyl alcohol (provided for in subheadings 

2207.10.60 and 2207.20) or any mixture 

containing such ethyl alcohol (provided for 

in heading 2710 or 3824) if such ethyl alcohol or mixture is to be used as a fuel or 

in producing a mixture of gasoline and alcohol, a mixture of a special fuel and alcohol, or any other mixture to be used as fuel 

(including motor fuel provided for in subheading 2710.11.15, 2710.19.15 or 

2710.19.21), or is suitable for any such 

uses .............................................................. Free Free 20%’’. 

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subchapter I of 

2 chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

3 United States is amended— 

4 (1) by striking heading 9901.00.50; and 

5 (2) by striking U.S. notes 2 and 3. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ GOLDEN IT, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

ITCON SERVICES, LLC, Defendant

______________________

2023

- 1992

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:22

- cv

- 01471

- TMD, Judge Thompson M. Dietz.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ON D AVIDSON L EVIN , Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Huntsville, AL, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

D OUGLAS G LENN E DELSCHICK , Commercial LitigationBranch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY , D OUGLAS K. M ICKLE

. Case: 23-1992 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 09/06/2024______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (T ARANTO , H UGHES , and C UNNINGHAM , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 6, 2024 Date Case: 23-1992 Document: 60 Page: 2 Filed: 09/06/2024
#### Catherine Stellwagen, Respondent, v. S. Wander & Sons’ Chemical Company, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed with costs. All concur, except De Angelis, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and dismissal of the complaint.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Gregory S. Walden Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Counsel for AeroCine Ventures LLC 1333 New Hampshire Avenue NW Washington

, DC 20037

Re: FAA

– 2014

– 0400

Dear Mr. Walden :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6689

ANGELA MARIA DOZIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL; THE KELLERS, Chaplains @ FCCW; ROACH, Nurse @ FCCW Infirmary; DAVID M. HINDS, Dr. @ FCCW Infirmary; A. SMITH, Ms., Case Manager @ FCCW; AGOGAH, Chaplain @ NCCIW; MS. JONES, Case Manager @ FCCW; JERRY JONES, Sheriff @ Franklin County Jail; JUDY SILLS, Manager @ NCDOC Combined Records; POOLE, Ms. @ FCCW Mailroom; TAYLOR, Ms., Mailroom Officer @ FCCW; SGT. WOODLEY, @ FCCW; MS. PEELE, Case Manager/Social Worker @ FCCW; PURVIS, Ms., Mental Health Social Worker @ FCCW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-171-BO-5) Submitted: September 9, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela Maria Dozier, Appellant Pro Se.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Angela Maria Dozier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dozier v. Franklin County Jail , No. CA05-171-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §296g. Prohibition against discrimination by schools on basis of sex

The Secretary may not make a grant, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy payment under this subchapter to, or for the benefit of, any school of nursing unless the application for the grant, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy payment contains assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that the school will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs. The Secretary may not enter into a contract under this subchapter with any school unless the school furnishes assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that it will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §809, formerly §845, as added Pub. L. 92–158, §11, Nov. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 479; renumbered §855, Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §941(k)(1), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 366; renumbered §810, Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §123(6), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3574; renumbered §809, Pub. L. 111–148, title V, §5310(b)(1), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 631.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 298b–2 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 105–392.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 296g, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §808, as added Aug. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–490, title II §212, 82 Stat. 783; amended Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–158, §3(a), 85 Stat. 469; July 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §902(c), 89 Stat. 354, authorized appropriations for special project grants and contracts and financial distress grants from the fiscal year ending June 30, 1972 through the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §§905, 922, July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 355, 359, effective July 1, 1975.

A prior section 296h, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §809, as added Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–158, §2(c), 85 Stat. 465, which related to loan guarantees and interest subsidies for construction of training facilities by nonprofit nursing schools, was renumbered section 805 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 94–63 and transferred to section 296d of this title.

A prior section 296i, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §810, as added Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–158, §4(b), 85 Stat. 474; amended July 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §902(e), 89 Stat. 355, authorized grants for start-up programs for new nurse training programs, and set out prerequisites, etc., prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §§905, 931(b), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 355, 362, effective July 1, 1975.
§ 1429.12 Service of process and papers by the Board. ( a ) *Methods of service.* Notices of hearings, reports and findings, decisions of Administrative Law Judges, complaints, written rulings on motions, decisions and orders, and all other papers required by this subchapter to be issued by the Board, the General Counsel, Regional Directors, Hearing Officers and Administrative Law Judges, shall be served personally or by certified mail or by telegraph.
( b ) *Upon whom served.* All papers required to be served under paragraph (a) of this section shall be served upon all counsel of record or other designated representative(s) of parties, and upon parties not so represented. Service upon such counsel or representative shall constitute service upon the party, but a copy also shall be transmitted to the party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* Proof of service shall be the verified return by the individual serving the papers setting forth the manner of such service, the return post office receipt, or the return telegraph receipt. When service is by mail, the date of service shall be the day when the matter served is deposited in the United States mail. When service is to be made to an addressee outside the United States, the date of service shall be the date received, as evidenced by official receipt.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15a-3 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75329-75330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: February 10-11, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washington Center, 9751 
Washingtonian Boulevard, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: Gerald G. Lovinger, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer

[[Page 75330]]

Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8101, Rockville, MD 20892-7405. (301) 496-7987.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 39.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27497 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Katherine B. Nuckolls, Respondent, v. Richard G. Nuckolls, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, ordering defendant’s rights of visitation and temporary custody of children under the judgment of separation forfeited until payments for support of children are made current.) Present — ■ Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GARRY PIERRE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 299

[ June 18, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Daliah H. Weiss , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CF007697AXX

.

Philip J. Massa of Philip J. Massa, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez

Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appell ee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 1508.740 Are suspension proceedings formal? ( a ) Suspension proceedings are conducted in a fair and informal manner. The suspending official may use flexible procedures to allow you to present matters in opposition. In so doing, the suspending official is not required to follow formal rules of evidence or procedure in creating an official record upon which the official will base a final suspension decision.
( b ) You as a respondent or your representative must submit any documentary evidence you want the suspending official to consider.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Katherine Pushkarowitz, Respondent, against A. & M. Kramer et al., Appellants, and Fund for Reopened Cases, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
### §290bb–39. Peer-supported mental health services

#### (a) Grants authorized

The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, shall award grants to eligible entities to enable such entities to develop, expand, and enhance access to mental health peer-delivered services.

#### (b) Use of funds

Grants awarded under subsection (a) shall be used to develop, expand, and enhance national, statewide, or community-focused programs, including virtual peer-support services and technology-related capabilities, including by—

(1) carrying out workforce development, recruitment, and retention activities, to train, recruit, and retain peer-support providers;

(2) building connections between mental health treatment programs, including between community organizations and peer-support networks, including virtual peer-support networks, and with other mental health support services;

(3) reducing stigma associated with mental health disorders;

(4) expanding and improving virtual peer mental health support services, including through the adoption of technologies and capabilities to expand access to virtual peer mental health support services, such as by acquiring equipment and software necessary to efficiently run virtual peer-support services; and

(5) conducting research on issues relating to mental illness and the impact peer-support has on resiliency, including identifying—

(A) the signs of mental illness;

(B) the resources available to individuals with mental illness and to their families; and

(C) the resources available to help support individuals living with mental illness.

#### (c) Special consideration

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give special consideration to the unique needs of rural areas.

#### (d) Definition

In this section, the term "eligible entity" means—

(1) a consumer-run nonprofit organization that—

(A) is principally governed by people living with a mental health condition; and

(B) mobilizes resources within and outside of the mental health community, which may include through peer-support networks, to increase the prevalence and quality of long-term wellness of individuals living with a mental health condition, including those with a co-occurring substance use disorder; or

(2) an Indian Tribe, Tribal organization, Urban Indian organization, or consortium of Tribes or Tribal organizations.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §520H, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1151, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5658.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 290bb–39, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §520H, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXII, §3211, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1203, related to improving outcomes for children and adolescents through services integration between child welfare and mental health services, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248.
#### § 1508.815 How may I contest a proposed debarment?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a proposed debarment, you or your representative must provide the debarring official with information in opposition to the proposed debarment. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
#### In the Matter of Douglas Sturgis, Appellant, v Frank L. Caldwell, as Acting Chairman, New York State Board of Parole, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner was convicted in 1973 and sentenced to 4 to 12 years for possession of drugs, 2>A to 7 years for possession of a weapon as a felony and 4 years on another charge of possession of a weapon. He met with the Parole Board in October, 1975 and was ordered held for a later appearance before the board for consideration of parole in October, 1977. The board gave to petitioner the following statement of its reasons for denying him parole at that time: "1. Your criminal record. All your past arrests involved weapons. 2. Your present incarceration involved a shootout with police. 3. You show no insight and little remorse for your past behavior. 4. Your unrealistic plans for the future.” Petitioner instituted this article 78 proceeding to require respondent Board of Parole to state more meaningful reasons for denying him parole. Special Term dismissed the petition, holding that the reasons stated by the board are meaningful and sufficient. We agree (see *Matter of Odom v Henderson,*57 AD2d 710, dec April 7, 1977). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.