alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0487 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-056-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332L2 and EC225LP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): XX Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect the torque loss of the bolts that secure the 

main gearbox bar attaching fittings and to prevent cracks that could lead to failure of the MGB 

supporting structure, detachment of the MGB and loss of helicopter control.

Costs

 Inspecting the torque of each bolt that secures the front and rear MGB attaching 

fitting would require 1 work-hour and no parts for a total cost of $85 per helicopter, and $340 for 

the U.S. fleet. 

 Readjusting the torque would add another 0.25 work-hour for a total cost of about 

$21 per helicopter.

 Replacing all four nuts and bolts of an attachment fitting would require 4 work-hours. 

Parts would cost $1,000 for a total cost of $1,340 per helicopter.

 Replacing the attachment fitting or plate would require 16 work-hours respectively. 

Parts would cost $2,000 respectively for a total cost of $3,360 to replace each part per helicopter.

 Replacing frames 3855 and 5295 would require 40 work-hours respectively. Parts 

would cost $5,000 to replace each frame for a total cost of $8,400 per frame per helicopter.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()
Project Engineer: Gary Roach
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water levels and artesianpressure in observation wells in the United States. Part 2, Southeasternstates.**
 
1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949
1950 | 1951 | 1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104678
 
August 22, 2019
### §291j–9. Eligibility for grants

Funds appropriated pursuant to section 291j–8 of this title shall be available for grants by the Secretary for not to exceed 50 per centum of the cost of construction or modernization of emergency rooms of public or nonprofit general hospitals, including provision or replacement of medical transportation facilities. Such grants shall be made by the Secretary only after consultation with the State agency designated in accordance with section 291d(a)(1) of this title. In order to be eligible for a grant under this part, the project, and the applicant therefor, must meet such criteria as may be prescribed by regulations. Such regulations shall be so designed as to provide aid only with respect to projects for which adequate assistance is not readily available from other Federal, State, local, or other sources, and to assist in providing modern, efficient, and effective emergency room service needed to care for victims of highway, industrial, agricultural, or other accidents and to handle other medical emergencies, and to assist in providing such service in geographical areas which have special need therefor.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §632, as added Pub. L. 91–296, title III, §301, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 351.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,899,878
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               8,400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    8,628,199
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         4,495,025
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4,542,529
<LOANS>                                        46,254,026
<ALLOWANCE>                                    766,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,933,011
<DEPOSITS>                                     64,476,813
<SHORT-TERM>                                   370,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            467,413
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,118,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 72,933,011
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,088,097
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              425,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               163,415
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,676,854
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,216,667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,226,969
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,449,885
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  80,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                827,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                701,140
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     701,140
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   473,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.57
<LOANS-NON>                                    605,974
<LOANS-PAST>                                   7,419
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                920,311
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               743,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  41,759
<RECOVERIES>                                   5,248
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              786,749
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           786,749
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Elva R. Woodward, Appellant, v. Edward J. Kelley, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ERIN RUBIN, A/K/A ERIN RUBIN

OCHOA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL RAMON OCHOA,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 347 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
### §300ff–131. Infectious diseases and circumstances relevant to notification requirements

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after October 30, 2009, the Secretary shall complete the development of—

(1) a list of potentially life-threatening infectious diseases, including emerging infectious diseases, to which emergency response employees may be exposed in responding to emergencies;

(2) guidelines describing the circumstances in which such employees may be exposed to such diseases, taking into account the conditions under which emergency response is provided; and

(3) guidelines describing the manner in which medical facilities should make determinations for purposes of section 300ff–133(d) of this title.

#### (b) Specification of airborne infectious diseases

The list developed by the Secretary under subsection (a)(1) shall include a specification of those infectious diseases on the list that are routinely transmitted through airborne or aerosolized means.

#### (c) Dissemination

The Secretary shall—

(1) transmit to State public health officers copies of the list and guidelines developed by the Secretary under subsection (a) with the request that the officers disseminate such copies as appropriate throughout the States; and

(2) make such copies available to the public.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2695, as added Pub. L. 111–87, §13, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2897.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as if enacted on Sept. 30, 2009, see section 2(a)(3)(B) of Pub. L. 111–87, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section note under section 300ff–11 of this title.
#### §§ 1600.104-1600.109 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3921 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3921

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 224.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 224.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 224.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of 
        the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision 
        of law, upon proper request filed with U.S. Customs and Border 
        Protection on or before the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
        for consumption, of an article--
                    (A) that was made after December 31, 2006, and 
                before the date that is 15 days after the date of 
                enactment of this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty or a lower rate of duty if the amendment made by 
                subsection (a) applied to such entry or withdrawal,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 
        applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

February 4, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30669 Summary Calendar

RODERICK PRESIDENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. STADLER, Individually, and in His Official Capacity; BARON KAYLO, Individually and in His Official Capacity; STORE MANAGER

AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Individually and in His Official Capacity; CLYDE BENSON, Individually and in His Official Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-655

Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Louisiana prisoner Roderick President appeals from the summary

judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that2

he had been detrimentally exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.

In dismissing his complaint, the district court r uled that

President had not p ropounded either evidence suggesting that the

exposure was the cause of his various ailments or evidence

suggesting that recent changes to his prison’s smoking policy were

ineffective. We affirm.

President has filed before this court on appeal affidavits of

several inmates, including himself, in an attempt to show that the

prison’s smo king policy is not enforced. These affidavits,

however, do not appear in the record, and they are not referenced

therein. As the affidavits were not before the district court, we

will not consider them now as part of President’s summary judgment

evidence. S ee Munoz v. Orr

, 200 F.3d 291, 303 (5th Cir. 2000).

Moreove r, because President gives no explanation, either in his

briefs on appeal or in the record before the district court, as to

why he could not file these affidavits, including his own, before

the district court in support of his claim, the district court’s

failure to grant President’s Rule 56(f) motion was not abuse of

discretion. S ee Beattie v. Madison County Sch. Dist.

, 254 F.3d

595, 605–06 (5th Cir. 2001).

Furthermore, because 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not give the

district court the authority to either pay or waive fees for the

services President req uested of the United States Marshals, the

district court properly denied President’s motion f or leave to1 A test designed to measure the amount of nicotine a person has inhaled.

We also observe that there is nothing to suggest that the results of this test

could alone suffice to authorize the granting of any relief.

3 perform a cotinine test. 1 S ee Pedraza v. Jones

, 71 F.3d 194, 196

(5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS EXHIBIT, AS INDICATED BY "XXX",
PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT THAT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

                  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH DR. ELIZABETH LEARY

                                 October 1, 2004

Dear Elizabeth:

I am pleased to extend to you this employment agreement. PBI is an exciting
place to work, and I feel confident that your continued employment here will
contribute to both your professional growth and to the success of the company.

Effective 10/1/04 your status will be changed to salaried status at the annual
rate of $190,000.00, plus standard 10/10 executive bonus plan. Your salary will
be payable in semi-monthly installments on the 7th and 22nd of each month.

As a result of your waiver of our health benefits, this offer has been increased
by 20%. If you decide to participate in our benefit package in the future your
annual salary will be adjusted accordingly.

Your bonus plan includes;

     o    10% Personal milestone if PBI has total revenue of $[XXX] over twelve
          months beginning October 1, 2004.
     o    10% Company milestone of salary base if total booked sales for PBI
          Laboratory reach or exceed $[XXX] in booked sales over twelve months
          beginning October 1, 2004.

You will be subject to the Company's Confidentiality and Invention Assignment
Agreement, which is enclosed with this letter and must be signed and returned to
Human Resources.

Upon your acceptance, this letter will contain the entire agreement and
understanding between you and PBI and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understanding, communications, offers, representations, warranties,
or commitments by or on behalf of PBI (oral or written). The terms of your
employment may in the future be amended but only in writing, which is signed by
both you and, on behalf of the company, a duly authorized officer.

If the terms are agreeable to you, please sign and date below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ron Helm
------------------------
Chairman/CEO
Pacific Biometrics, Inc.

I agree to and I accept the employment offer presented above.

/s/ Elizabeth Leary
------------------------


CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS PAGE, AS INDICATED BY "XXX",
PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT THAT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE SEC.
-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN 

& BALINT, P.C. 

Andrew S. Friedman (admitted pro hac vice) 

Wendy J. Harrison (CA SBN 151090) 

2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000 

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 

Tel: (602) 274-1100 

Fax: (602) 274-1199 

E-mail: afriedman@bffb.com 

wharrison@bffb.com 

RODDY KLEIN & RYAN 

Gary Klein (admitted pro hac vice) 

Shennan Kavanagh 

727 Atlantic Avenue 

Boston, MA 02111-02810 

Telephone: 617-357-5500, ext. 15 

Facsimile: 617-357-5030 

E-mail: klein@roddykleinryan.com 

 kavanagh@roddykleinryan.com 

Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel 

[Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ANA RAMIREZ, ISMAEL RAMIREZ 

and JORGE SALAZAR, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, 

INC. 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 08-cv-00369-TEH 

CLASS ACTION

Judge: Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING 

LITIGATION PENDING FINAL 

APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 

Pursuant to Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, 

Case 3:08-cv-00369-TEH Document 220 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2
 -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is stayed pending final approval of the terms 

of the settlement or until any part of the Settlement Agreement referred to herein is not approved 

and the parties cannot reach a new agreement with respect thereto. 

DATED: ___________ 

 

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson 

United States District Court Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

08/24/10

Case 3:08-cv-00369-TEH Document 220 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2
#### (A) In the Matter of the Claim of Helen Richman, Appellant, v. Chit Chat Luncheonette et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Trupiano, Appellant, v. Paramount Macaroni Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (C) In the Matter of the Claim of Rafael Kanter, Appellant, v. A. Ruderman Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (D) In the Matter of the Claim of John H. Johnson, Appellant, v. Famous Merchandise Co., Inc., Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (E) In the Matter of the Claim of Rafael De Lacruz, Claimant, and Abraham Sher, Appellant, v. Montefiore Hospital et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (F) Lillian Mead, Respondent, v. Susan A. Barre et al., Appellants. (G) Jennie Hamblin et al., Appellants, v. W. T. Grant Company, Respondent. (H) Gerald St. Louis, Appellant, v. Malcolm Rock, Respondent.

[In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal granted, by default, without costs.
Exhibit 35.2



Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.



I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of
Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:



A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for
the period from November 2, 2020 through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s
performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 24, 2019 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables
LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere
Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.





|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | Deere Credit Services, Inc.               
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                           
|                       |     |                                           
|                       | By: | /s/ Steven N. Owenson                     
|                       |     | Steven N. Owenson                         
|                       |     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director
110 STAT. 3818 PUBLIC LAW 104–311—OCT. 19, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3155:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–824 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–311

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Wekiva River, Seminole

Creek, and Rock Springs Run in the State of Florida for study and potential

addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DESIGNATION.

Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C.

1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘( ) WEKIVA RIVER, FLORIDA.—(A) The entire river.

‘‘(B) The Seminole Creek tributary.

‘‘(C) The Rock Springs Run tributary.’’.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT.

Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C.

1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘( ) The study of the Wekiva River and the tributaries

designated in paragraph ( ) of subsection (a) shall be completed

and the report transmitted to Congress not later than two years

after the date of the enactment of this paragraph.’’.

Approved October 19, 1996.

Oct. 19, 1996

[H.R. 3155]
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2016filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:May 3, 2016By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.