alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         156,573
<SECURITIES>                                    73,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                  287,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,329)
<INVENTORY>                                    721,214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,383,350
<PP&E>                                         855,128
<DEPRECIATION>                               (112,438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,075,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,381,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,998
<COMMON>                                       265,282
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,616,567)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,075,347
<SALES>                                        517,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,975
<CGS>                                          418,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,718,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,616,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,616,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,616,657)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Wilson                                  Date May 15, 2006
----------------------------------
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer

                                       24
Exhibit 10.5


 


GUARANTEE


 


GUARANTY given by Maury Taylor II the undersigned, to induce the
acceptance of the attached Promissory Note, dated January 25, 2006, of the same
date, by Adron Holding, LLC.


 


1. Obligation. In consideration of the advancement of funds paid by
Adron Holdings, LLC for the Promissory Note (“Note”), the undersigned hereby
unconditionally guarantees to Adron Holdings, LLC, its successors and assigns,
and to every subsequent holder of the Note, that an amount of one half of the
sum stated therein to be payable on the Note (which shall not exceed Thirteen
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($13,500.00), shall be promptly paid in full.
This guarantee shall apply to all payments due on the Note, up to the specified
amount, in accordance with the terms thereof, whether at maturity, by
acceleration or otherwise, and, in case of any extension of time of payment or
renewal, in whole or in part, all sums shall be promptly paid when due
according to such extension or extensions, renewal or renewals.


 


2. Consent. The undersigned hereby consents that at any time, without
notice to the undersigned, payment of any sums payable on the Note may be
extended or the Note may be renewed in whole or in part and that any of the
acts mentioned in the Note may be done, without affecting the liability of the
undersigned.


 


3. Waiver. The undersigned hereby waives presentment, demand for
payment by the maker or anyone else, protest and notice of nonpayment, dishonor
or protest of the Note, and all other notices and demands.


 


 


	
  Date:

  	
  1/30/06

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Maury Taylor II

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Maury Taylor II
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

R.M., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D16

- 4381

[ November 9, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Stacy M. Ross , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16000866 DLA

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Travis Dunnington, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney,

Senior Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 340.

#### Dugas *v.*American Surety Co.

April 26, 1937.

300 U. S. 414.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD 

FRAMEWORK – FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585 

Friday, July 17, 2015 

Room 8E-089 

Purpose 

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy 

conservation standard framework document. DOE will also explain its plans for the remaining 

rulemaking stages and analyses. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the rulemaking, including 

planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources. 

Agenda 

 9:00 am-9:30 am Welcome; Introductions; Opening Statements Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager

 9:30 am-10:00 am Overview; Scope of Coverage 

 Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager 

 

 10:00 am-10:30 am Market and Technology Assessment; Screening Analysis 

Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 10:30 am-10:45 am Break 

 10:45 am-11:30 am Engineering Analysis 

Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 11:30 am-12:00 am Energy Use Analysis; Markups Analysis; Life-Cycle Cost 

Analysis 

Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

 

 12:00 am-12:45 pm Lunch 

 12:45 pm-1:15 pm Shipments Analysis; National Impact Analysis 

Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

 1:15 pm-1:30 pm NOPR Analyses 

Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 1:30 pm-1:45 pm Questions; Closing Remarks 

 Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify, pursuant  to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 15, 2010





By /s/ Mark Meller


Mark Meller


President, Chief Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer
### §19102. Purposes

The purposes of the Directorate established under section 19101 of this title are to—

(1) support use-inspired and translational research and accelerate the development and use of federally funded research;

(2) strengthen United States competitiveness by accelerating the development of key technologies; and

(3) grow the domestic workforce in key technology focus areas, and expand the participation of United States students and researchers in areas of societal, national, and geostrategic importance, at all levels of education.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10382, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1576.)
### §14118. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14118 was editorially reclassified as section 12578 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Stipulation To Continue Sentencing

Hearing; (Proposed) Order (CR-08-730-WHA) 1

NINA WILDER (CA SBN 100474)

WEINBERG & WILDER

Attorneys at Law

523 Octavia Street

San Francisco, California 94102

Tel. (415) 431-3472

FAX (415) 552-2703

ninawilder@aol.com

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. CR-08-730-WHA

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) 

 ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

vs. ) SENTENCING HEARING; 

 ) (PROPOSED) ORDER 

DANIEL ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ,) 

 ) DATE: April 27, 2010

 ) TIME: 2:00 p.m. 

Defendant. ) JUDGE: Hon. William H. Alsup 

_______________________________)

IT IS HEREBY AGREED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, with the

assent of the U.S. Probation Office, that the date for sentencing defendant Daniel Gonzalez shall

be continued to May 19, 2010 at 2:00 p.m.

The additional time is required to assemble defendant’s medical records, as well as other

documentation, that are needed to complete the presentence investigation and report. 

Dated: March 29, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

By: /s/ W.S. Wilson Leung 

WILSON LEUNG

Assistant United States Attorney

///

Case 3:08-cr-00730-WHA Document 1612 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Stipulation To Continue Sentencing

Hearing; (Proposed) Order (CR-08-730-WHA) 2

Dated: March 29, 2010 WEINBERG & WILDER

 By: /s/ Nina Wilder 

NINA WILDER

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Judge

April 2, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cr-00730-WHA Document 1612 Filed 04/02/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the intent to exclusively license a U.S. Army Invention entitled Moving Target Indication Algorithm for Video Surveillance Applications. The invention intended to be licensed has been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC.

Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory intends to exclusively or partially exclusively license the invention listed below to videoNEXT Network Solutions, LLC, a small business which is interested in manufacturing, using and/or selling devices or processes involved in this invention.

*Title:*                         Moving Target Indication Algorithm for Video Surveillance Applications.                    

*Inventors:*                         Alex Chan.                    

*Patent Number:*                         Provisional Application, Registration No. 39,612.                    

*Issued Date:*                         Filed September 13, 2004.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norma Cammarata, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRD-ARL-DP-T, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-1197; tel: (301) 394-2952, fax: (301) 394-5818.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-27572 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
§ 45.7 Unique product identifiers. Each swap shall be identified in all recordkeeping and all swap data reporting pursuant to this part by means of a unique product identifier and product classification system as specified in this section. Each swap sufficiently standardized to receive a unique product identifier shall be identified by a unique product identifier. Each swap not sufficiently standardized for this purpose shall be identified by its description using the product classification system. ( a ) *Requirements for the unique product identifier and product classification system.* The unique product identifier and product classification system shall identify and describe the swap asset class and the sub-type within that asset class to which the swap belongs, and the underlying product for the swap, with sufficient distinctiveness and specificity to enable the Commission and other financial regulators to fulfill their regulatory responsibilities and to assist in real time reporting of swaps as provided in the Act and part 43 of this chapter. The level of distinctiveness and specificity which the unique product identifier will provide shall be determined separately for each swap asset class.
( b ) *Designation of the unique product identifier and product classification system.* ( 1 ) The Commission shall determine when a unique product identifier and product classification system that is acceptable to the Commission and satisfies the requirements set forth in this section is available for use in compliance with this section.
( 2 ) When the Commission determines that such a unique product identifier and product classification system is available, the Commission shall designate the unique product identifier and product classification system to be used in recordkeeping and swap data reporting pursuant to this part, by means of a Commission order that is published in the Federal Register and on the Web site of the Commission, as soon as practicable after such determination is made. The order shall include notice of this designation, the contact information of the issuer of such unique product identifiers, and information concerning the procedure and requirements for obtaining unique product identifiers and using the product classification system.
( c ) *Use of the unique product identifier and product classification system by registered entities and swap counterparties.* ( 1 ) When a unique product identifier and product classification system has been designated by the Commission pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, each registered entity and swap counterparty shall use the unique product identifier and product classification system in all recordkeeping and swap data reporting pursuant to this part.
( 2 ) Before a unique product identifier and product classification system has been designated by the Commission, each registered entity and swap counterparty shall use the internal product identifier or product description used by the swap data repository to which a swap is reported in all recordkeeping and swap data reporting pursuant to this part.
[77 FR 2197, Jan. 13, 2012, as amended at 85 FR 75563, Nov. 25, 2020]
#### § 38.160 Additional sources for compliance.

Applicants and designated contract markets may refer to the guidance in appendix B of this part to demonstrate to the Commission compliance with the requirements of § 38.150 of this part.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4330 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify the 

maximum distance between Farm Service Agency county offices for purposes of the closure or relocation of a county office for the Farm 

Service Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mrs. NOEM (for herself and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to clarify the maximum distance between Farm Service 

Agency county offices for purposes of the closure or 

relocation of a county office for the Farm Service Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4330 IH

1 SECTION 1. DRIVING DISTANCE FOR PURPOSES OF PROHI2 BITION ON CLOSURE OR RELOCATION OF 

3 COUNTY OFFICES FOR THE FARM SERVICE 

4 AGENCY. 

5 Section 14212(b)(1) of the Food, Conservation, and 

6 Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 6932a(b)(1)) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘driving’’ after ‘‘20’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1428.3 Board decision. ( a ) A decision and order of the Assistant Secretary shall be enforced unless it is arbitrary and capricious or based upon manifest disregard of the law.
( b ) The Board shall issue its decision on the case enforcing, enforcing as modified, refusing to enforce, or remanding the decision and order of the Assistant Secretary.
(May 17, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Patsy Zaccaro, Appellant, v. Thomas E. Rosetti, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order entered on October 18, 1961 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
UNI T E D S T A T E S E N V IR O N M E N T A L P R O T E C T I O N A G E NC Y

R E G I O N I X

75 Ha w tho r n e S t r ee t

S a n F r a n ci s c o

, C A 9 4 10 5

November 1, 2011

Ms. K are n M a g li a no, M a n a g e r

A i r Q u a li t y D a t a B ra n c h

P l a nn i n g a nd T e c hn i ca l S uppo r t D i v i s i o n

A i r R e sou rce s B o a r d

C a li f o r n i a Env i r on m e n t a l P r o t ec ti on A g e n c y

P

. O

. B o x 2815

S acra m e n t o, C A 9581 2

D ear Ms. M a g li a no :

Th a nk y o u f

o r y ou r tim e l y sub mi ss i on o f t h e 201 1 A nnu a l Mon it o r i n g N e t w o r k R e po r t f o r S m a ll

D i s t r i c t s i n C a li f

o r n i a

. W e h a v e re v i e w e d t h e s u b mitt e d do c u m e n t a nd h a v e f ound t h a t it m ee t s a ll o f

t h e re qu i re m e n t s f

o r a n n u a l n e t w o r k p l a ns a s re q u i re d b y o u r r e gu l a ti ons s e t f o r t h und er

40 C F R P a r t

58.10. W h il e t h i s l e tt er s er v e s a s o ff i c i a l a p p r ov a l o f t h e a nnu a l n e t w o r k p l a n, it do e s no t c ons tit u t e

a pp r ov a l o f t h e s y s t e m m od i f i ca ti ons t h a t are p r o p os e d i n t h e p l a n f o r t h e f u t u re

. W e w ill c on ti nu e t o

w o r k w it h y o u r a g e n c y t o re v i e w s y s t e m c h a n g e s a s t h e y p r o c ee d. L a s t l y

, p l ea s e r e v i e w c o mm e n t s t o

n e t w o r k p l a ns sub mitt e d b y o t h er a g e n c i e s t h a t a re w it h i n t h e C A R B P QAO

.

I f y ou h a v e a n y qu e s ti o n s r e g ar d i n g t h i s l e tt er , p l e a s e f e e l f r ee t o c on t a c t m e a t ( 415 ) 97 2

- 3851 o r

M ere d it h K u rp i us a t ( 41 5 ) 947

- 4534

.

S i n cere l y

,

/ s /

M a tt h e w L a k i n, M a n a g e r

A i r Q u a li t y A n a l y s i s Of

f i c e

A i r D i v i s i on

cc : K e n S t r oud, A R B

M i k e M i g u e l

, A R B
#### Ardith Polley, Respondent, v Stanley Polley, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a resettled order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 9, 1977, as awarded temporary alimony to the plaintiff wife in the amount of $500 per week, retroactive to June 17, 1977. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion for temporary alimony referred to the trial court for determination. In view of the photographic evidence in the record, which strongly indicates that plaintiff may have been guilty of adultery, Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in granting an award of temporary alimony without first resolving the factual issues surrounding the photograph and the circumstances under which it was taken. This can best be accomplished at the trial where, if the trier of the facts credits the evidence. of the wife’s adultery, a retroactive award of temporary alimony will be barred (see *Nobel v Nobel,*49 AD2d 850; see, also, Domestic Relations Law, § 236). If her explanation is credited, such an award may be made. Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Suozzi, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: I.M.R., AN ALLEGED

INCAPACITATED PERSON

PETITION OF: WILLIAM CARDWELL :

:

:

:

: No. 114 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of January , 202 4

, the Application for Exercise of

Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Lewis, Sr., Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 188]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion following a *Wade*hearing. The single photograph identification procedure was not unduly suggestive; the police officer’s identification of defendant from that photograph two hours after observing defendant during a face-to-face drug transaction was merely confirmatory, and thus there was no need for a *Wade*hearing *(see, People v Montgomery,*213 AD2d 563, 564, *affd*88 NY2d 926; *People v Wharton,*74 NY2d 921, 922-923; *People v Chavys,*263 AD2d 964, 965, *lv denied*94 NY2d 821; *People v Miles,*219 AD2d 685, 686-687, *lv denied 87*NY2d 905, 88 NY2d 968). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sir-kin, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.