1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA State Bar No. 88500) 

john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com 

JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA State Bar No. 209134) 

jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com 

FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)

fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SHARP CORPORATION and 

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 

[additional counsel listed on signature 

pages]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

MDL No. 1827 

This Document Relates to Case No. 09-

CV-5609 SI 

NOKIA CORPORATION and 

NOKIA INC., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU 

OPTRONICS CORPORATION 

AMERICA, INC.; CHUNGHWA 

PICTURE TUBES, LTD.; TATUNG 

COMPANY; TATUNG COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, INC.; SEIKO EPSON 

CORPORATION; EPSON IMAGING 

DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; 

HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, 

LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC 

DEVICES (USA), INC.; LG DISPLAY 

CO. LTD.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS 

NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 

IN NOKIA ACTION

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; 

SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; 

SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP 

ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA 

AMERICA ELECTRONIC 

COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA 

MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.; and 

TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION 

SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendants.

WHEREAS plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. (jointly, “Nokia”) filed the 

above-captioned lawsuit on November 25, 2009; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s order of June 29, 2010, Nokia filed an 

Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief on July 23, 2010; 

WHEREAS the parties have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, to 

extend the time within which defendants must move against, answer or otherwise respond 

to Nokia’s amended complaint; 

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline 

already fixed by the Court; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and 

among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Nokia, on the one 

hand, and defendants AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; 

Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.; Tatung Company; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; Seiko 

Epson Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Epson Electronics America, Inc.; 

Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; Philips 

Electronics North America Corporation; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung 

Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Samsung 

SDI America, Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Tatung Company; 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

Tatung Company of America, Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronic 

Components, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; and Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Stipulating Defendants”) on the other hand, as follows: 

1. Stipulating Defendants will have until August 27, 2010, to move against, answer or 

otherwise respond to Nokia’s amended complaint. 

2. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any 

challenge to personal jurisdiction by any Defendant.

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: August 5, 2010. 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation 

and Nokia, Inc.

By: /s/ Randall Allen 

 Randall Allen 

ALSTON + BIRD LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 

650-838-2001

Peter Kontio 

Valarie C. Williams 

B. Parker Miller 

ALSTON + BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

404-881-7000

Richard W. Stimson 

ALSTON + BIRD LLP 

Chase Tower, Suite 3601 

2200 Ross Avenue 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

214-922-3400

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

Counsel for AU Optronics Corporation, 

AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc. By: /s/ Carl L. Blumenstein 

Carl L. Blumenstein 

Christopher A. Nedeau

Bryan B. Barnhart 

Nossaman LLP 

50 California Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

415-438-7274

Counsel for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. 

By: /s/ Joel S. Sanders 

Joel S. Sanders 

Rachel S. Brass

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

415-393-8306

Counsel for Seiko Epson Corporation, 

Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, 

Epson Electronics America, Inc. 

By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero 

Melvin R. Goldman 

Stephen P. Freccero 

Derek F. Foran 

Morrison & Foerster LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105 

415-268-9000

Counsel for Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, 

Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), 

Inc.

By: /s/ Kent M. Roger 

Kent M. Roger

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 

One Market 

Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

415-442-1140

Counsel for Philips Electronics North 

America Corporation By: /s/ Garrard R. Beeney 

Garrard R. Beeney 

Theodore Edelman 

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 

125 Broad Street 

New York, NY 10004-2498 

212-558-4000

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc.

By: /s/ Derek Ludwin 

Robert D. Wick 

Timothy C. Hester 

Derek Ludwin 

Covington & Burling LLP 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004

202-662-6000

Counsel for Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., 

Samsung SDI America, Inc. By: /s/ Michael W. Scarborough 

Gary L. Halling 

James L. McGinnis 

Michael W. Scarborough 

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4106

415-434-9100

Counsel for Sharp Corporation, Sharp 

Electronics Corporation By: /s/ John M. Grenfell 

John M. Grenfell 

Jacob R. Sorensen 

Fusae Nara 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7880

415-983-1000

Counsel for Tatung Company, Tatung 

Company of America, Inc. By: /s/ Patrick J. Ahern 

Patrick J. Ahern 

Roxane C. Busey 

Karen Sewell 

Baker & McKenzie LLP 

One Prudential Plaza 

130 East Randolph Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601 

312-861-8000

Counsel for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Electronic Components, Inc., 

Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc. 

By: /s/ John H. Chung 

Wayne A. Cross

John H. Chung 

White & Case LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

212-819-8200

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

500589347v1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING IN NOKIA ACTION 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

 Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other 

signatories thereto has been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________________ 

 _______________________________________ 

Hon. Susan Illston 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1955 Filed 08/11/10 Page 6 of 6