alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael L. Hartzmark, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 13, 2006

                                       /s/ Michael L. Hartzmark
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael L. Hartzmark
                                       Interim Chief Financial Officer
§ 1006.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 1006.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a higher tier participant? At any time after you enter into a lower tier covered transaction with a person at a higher tier, you must provide immediate written notice to that person if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 1006.355; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 1006.355.
§ 229.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael R. Rolle, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 344]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J.— Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Wisner, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water levels in theUnited States. Northwestern states.**
 
1956-60 | 1961-65 | 1966-70 | 1971-74
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104690
 
August 22, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 49
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

§ 49.29 Information relating to swap data repository compliance. ( a ) *Requests for information.* Upon the Commission's request, a swap data repository shall file with the Commission information related to its business as a swap data repository and such information as the Commission determines to be necessary or appropriate for the Commission to perform the duties of the Commission under the Act and regulations in 17 CFR chapter I. The swap data repository shall file the information requested in the form and manner and within the time period the Commission specifies in the request.
( b ) *Demonstration of compliance.* Upon the Commission's request, a swap data repository shall file with the Commission a written demonstration, containing supporting data, information, and documents, that it is in compliance with its obligations under the Act and the Commission's regulations in 17 CFR chapter I, as the Commission specifies in the request. The swap data repository shall file the written demonstration in the form and manner and within the time period the Commission specifies in the request.
[85 FR 75663, Nov. 25, 2020]
#### § 213.24 General.

The CFO may compromise claims for money or property when the principal balance of a claim, exclusive of interest, penalties, and administrative costs, does not exceed $100,000. Where the claim exceeds $100,000, the authority to accept the compromise rests with DOJ. The CFO may reject an offer of compromise in any amount. DOJ's approval is not required if the Agency rejects a compromise offer. When the claim exceeds $100,000 and the CFO recommends acceptance of a compromise offer, he or she will refer the claim with his or her recommendation to DOJ for approval. The referral may be in the form of the Claims-Collection Litigation Report (CCLR) and will outline the basis for USAID's recommendation. USAID refers compromise offers for claims in excess of $100,000 to the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, unless otherwise provided by DOJ's delegations or procedures.

[86 FR 31145, June 11, 2021]
#### § 1506.23 Will the debt be collected in a lump sum or by installment deductions from my pay account?

A debt will be collected in a lump sum or by installment deductions at established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account. If the employee is financially unable to pay a debt in a lump sum or the amount of debt exceeds 15 percent of disposable pay, collection will be made in installments, unless the employee and the Agency agree to alternative arrangements for payment. Alternative payment schedules must be in writing, signed by both the employee and the CFO and will be documented in the Agency's files.
§ 1423.14 Conduct of hearing. ( a ) Hearings shall be conducted not earlier than five (5) days after the date on which the complaint is served. The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the Administrative Law Judge. A substitute Administrative Law Judge may be designated at any time to take the place of the Administrative Law Judge previously designated to conduct the hearing. Such hearing shall, to the extent practicable, be conducted in accordance with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 of the United States Code, except that the parties shall not be bound by the rules of evidence, whether statutory, common law, or adopted by a court.
( b ) An official reporter shall make the only official transcript of such proceedings. Copies of the official transcript may be examined in the appropriate regional office during normal working hours. Requests by parties for copies of transcripts should be made to the official hearing reporter.
### §1507. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, title VI, §616, 65 Stat. 317, prohibited from Sept. 1, 1951 to June 30, 1953, initiation of projects, and waiver or suspension of income limitations contained in United States Housing Act of 1937, pursuant to authorization contained in sections 1501 and 1505 of this title.
§ 212.2 Policy. ( a ) As a general policy, USAID follows a balanced approach in administering the FOIA. USAID recognizes the right of the public to access information in the possession of the Agency. USAID also recognizes the legitimate interests of organizations or persons who have submitted records to the Agency or who would otherwise be affected by release of records. USAID has no discretion to release certain records, such as trade secrets and confidential commercial information, prohibited from release by law. USAID's policy calls for the fullest responsible disclosure consistent with those requirements of administrative necessity and confidentiality which are recognized under the FOIA.
( b ) For purposes of subparts A through K, M, and O of this part, *record* means information regardless of its physical form or characteristics including information created, stored, and retrievable by electronic means that is created or obtained by the Agency and under the control of the Agency at the time of the request, including information maintained for the Agency by an entity under Government contract for records management purposes. It does not include records that are not already in existence and that would have to be created specifically to respond to a request. Information available in electronic form shall be searched and compiled in response to a request unless such search and compilation would significantly interfere with the operation of the Agency's automated information systems.
#### In the Matter of Gary R. De Filippo, Petitioner, v Alan G. Hevesi, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 181]

Crew III, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a court officer, applied for accidental disability retirement benefits for injuries that he sustained to his knees and back during three separate incidents wherein he was called upon to control unruly people in the courthouse. That application ultimately was denied by respondent on the basis that, among other things, petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from working. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s determination.

Substantial evidence in the record supports respondent’s determination that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from his employment *(see Matter of English v McCall,*6 AD3d 923, 924-925 [2004]). Leon Sultan, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon who twice examined petitioner and reviewed his medi*653cal history at the request of the New York State and Local Retirement System, opined that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties as a court officer. Sultan testified that petitioner was “orthopedically stable and neurologically intact” with regard to his knees and back. Specifically, Sultan testified that aside from voluntary resistance from petitioner, he did not note any objective evidence of ongoing orthopedic impairment or functional limitation. To the extent that petitioner’s orthopedic expert offered a contrary opinion, respondent was “ ‘vested with the authority to weigh the conflicting opinions of medical experts and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another’ ” *(Matter of Hoehn v Hevesi,*14 AD3d 761, 762 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 708 [2005], quoting *Matter of Collins v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 5*AD3d 817, 818 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining arguments, including whether one of the three underlying incidents constitutes an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law, are either without merit or have been rendered academic in view of our disposition herein.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### § 1508.975 Notice.

*Notice* means a written communication served in person, sent by certified mail or its equivalent, or sent electronically by e-mail or facsimile. (See § 1508.615.)
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4062 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, California, as 

the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ MacWilliams Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4062 EH

1 SECTION 1. NELSON ‘‘MAC’’ MACWILLIAMS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, 

5 California, as the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ MacWilliams Post Office 

6 Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ 

11 MacWilliams Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4062 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMacWilliams Post Office Building’’. mona, California, as the ‘‘Nelson ‘Mac’ al Service located at 1444 Main Street in Ra-
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ancillary Studies to 
Major Ongoing NIDDK Clinical Research Studies.
    Date: January 13, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott BWI Airport, 1742 West Nursery Road, Baltimore, 
MD 21240.
    Contact Person: Dan E. Matsumoto, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 749, Office of 
Scientific Affairs, Room 749, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National 
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452. (301) 594-8894. 
matsumotod@extra,niddk.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 8, 2004.
Laverne Y. Stringfield
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27409 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-01-M
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.2

    


    Description
      of 2006 Executive Bonus Plan

    


    Establish
      a bonus pool with target cash payouts for the Chief Executive Officer and other
      executive officers. The key performance measure for the plan is net income.
      Under the Plan, incentive awards will begin at an increase from 2005’s earnings
      of 7.3%, where payouts would begin at 20% of base salary for the Chief Executive
      Officer, and 10% of a base salary for other Executive Officers. Payouts under
      the plan would increase on a pro-rata basis to 100% of base salary for the
      Chief
      Executive Officer and 50% of base salary for other Executive Officers upon
      attainment of an earnings increase over 2005 of
      31.6%.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 19, 2022

No. 04-22-00503-CV

Patrick MINOR,

Appellant

v.

DIVERSE FACILITY SOLUTIONS,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI00808

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 8, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal stating his intent to appeal the 

trial court’s “denial of default judgment.” Because no final order has been entered in the 

underlying case, on September 28, 2022, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing no later 

than October 18, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On 

October 17, 2022, appellant filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to Prepair [sic] a Brief.” 

Construing the motion as a request for extension of time to file a response to our show cause 

order,1 we GRANT the requested extension and appellant is ORDERED to show cause in writing 

no later than November 2, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. If appellant does not respond by November 2, 2022, this appeal is subject to 

dismissal.

_______________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

1 Appellant included a post-script requesting a public defender, which we do not have authority to grant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0122:  Status of Yucca Mountain Repository Program Activities

Accession Number: ML16201A110

Date Released: Tuesday, November 8, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16201A121 - SECY-16-0122:  Status of Yucca Mountain Repository Program Activities (4 page(s), 10/19/2016)
    - ML16201A112 - SECY-16-0122:  Enclosure 1 - Status of Yucca Mountain Repository Program Activities (1 page(s), 10/19/2016)
    - ML16201A114 - SECY-16-0122:  Enclosure 2 - Status of Yucca Mountain Repository Program Activities (2 page(s), 10/19/2016)
    - ML16201A117 - SECY-16-0122:  Enclosure 3 - Status of Yucca Mountain Repository Program Activities (1 page(s), 10/19/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of the County Trust Company, as Executor of John T. Buckley, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
#### Charles P. Saillard, appellant, v. Frank Schaefer, appellee.

Action for personal injuries due to the breaking of a railing on premises owned by defendant on which plaintiff was a tenant. Judgment for defendant on demurrer. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed July 10, 1922.

L. E. Stone, for appellant. John P. Snigg, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
OMB Control No. 2060-0336

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71

FORM PTE - POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY

INSTRUCTIONS: Complete this form once for the facility. You may find it helpful to complete form EMISS for each emissions unit before completing 

this form. For each emissions unit with emissions that count towards applicability, list the emissions unit ID and the PTE for the air 

pollutants listed below. If there are other air pollutants not listed below for which the source is a major source, provide attachments 

naming the air pollutant and showing calculation of the total for that pollutant. Round values to the nearest tenth of a ton. Add all 

values together in each column and enter the total in the space provided at the bottom of the table. Also report these totals in 

section J of form GIS.

Emissions Unit ID Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

NOx

(tons/yr)

VOC

(tons/yr)

SO2

(tons/yr)

PM10

(tons/yr)

CO

(tons/yr)

Lead

(tons/yr)

HAP

(tons/yr)

Tank 60 0.0512 4.98E-05

Tank 300 0.0287 2.71E-05

Tank 302 0.1894 1.84E-04

Tank 304 0.0567 5.45E-05

Tank 306 0.0993 9.59E-05

Tank 308 0.2218 2.15E-04

Tank 310 0.2569 2.48E-04

Tank 312 0.3517 3.42E-04

Tank 314 0.2117 2.05E-04

Bulk Solids Storage 2.56 0.0188

Fugitive Equipment Leaks 0.0738 0.0001

Boiler 1 4.51 0.248 0.027 0.343 3.79

Emergency Generator #1 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071

Emergency Generator #2 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071
TOTALS 74.99 15.63 66.25 12.62 30.85 0.0968 21.4
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****USDC approved establishments.**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2019
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.338:
Item Number:0609-C-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104369
 
August 19, 2019
### §1857l. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–95, title III, §306, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 777

Section, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §316, formerly §13, as added Dec. 17, 1963, Pub. L. 88–206, §1, 77 Stat. 401; renumbered title III, §306, and amended Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(4), (6), (7), 79 Stat. 992; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–675, §2(a), 80 Stat. 954; renumbered §309 and amended Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 506; renumbered §316 and amended Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §§12(a), 13(b), 84 Stat. 1705, 1709; Apr. 9, 1973, Pub. L. 93–15, §1(c), 87 Stat. 11; June 22, 1974, Pub. L. 93–319, §13(c), 88 Stat. 265, authorized appropriations for air pollution control. See section 7626 of this title.