alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USING POOL CHEMICALS SAFELY

For more information about the safe use of pool chemicals, check your pool safety plan or visit 

www.cdc.gov/healthyswimming

Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CS232164-C

 Get trained in pool chemical safety (for example, during operator training course)

 Ask for help if you are NOT trained for specific tasks

 Read entire product label or Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) before using

 Learn your pool’s Emergency Chemical Spill Response Plan and practice steps 

(for example, evacuation)

 Dress for safety by wearing appropriate safety equipment (for example, safety 

goggles, gloves, and mask)

 Read chemical product label before each use

 Handle in a well-ventilated area

 Open one product container at a time and close it before opening another

 Minimize dust, fumes, and splashes

 Measure carefully

 Never mix

 Chlorine products with acid; this could create toxic gases

 Different pool chemicals (for example, different types of chlorine products) with each 

other or with any other substance

 Only pre-dissolve pool chemicals when directed by product label

 If product label directs pre-dissolving, add pool chemical to water; NEVER add water to 

pool chemical because violent (potentially explosive) reaction can occur

Always respond to pool chemical spills immediately. Follow your pool’s Emergency Chemical 

Spill Response Plan, and be sure to contact the proper authorities and management.

BEFORE YOU USE POOL CHEMICALS 

Pool Address and Phone Number:

Emergency Response Phone Number: 

Local Health Department Phone Number:

POOL CHEMICAL SAFETY: USE

PROTECT YOURSELF AND SWIMMERS FROM THE THOUSANDS OF PREVENTABLE INJURIES THAT OCCUR EACH YEAR
No. 853.

#### White *v.*Aronson, Trustee.

May 3, 1937.

*Solicitor General Reed*for petitioner. *Mr. Samuel Gottlieb*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.
August 19, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0085 – EVALUATION OF 

THE CONTAINMENT PROTECTION AND RELEASE 

REDUCTION FOR MARK I AND MARK II BOILING WATER 

REACTORS RULEMAKING ACTIVITIES (10 CFR PART 50) 

(RIN-3150-AJ26) 

The Commission has disapproved the staff's plan to issue a Federal Register notice requesting 

public comments on the draft regulatory basis for the Containment Protection and Release 

Reduction rulemaking. The Commission has approved Alternative 1, Order EA-13-109 

implementation without additional regulatory actions. 

The staff should leverage the draft regulatory basis to the extent applicable to support resolution 

of the post-Fukushima Tier 3 item related to containments of other designs (Near-Term Task 

Force Recommendation 5.2). 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
NRC AND SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LICENSE 

AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR SAN ONOFRE 2 IN ROCKVILLE, MD, ON APRIL 3

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Southern 

California Edison in Rockville, Md., on April 3 to discuss the utility’s plan to submit a license 

amendment request for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2.

The meeting will run from 1-3 p.m. in the Commission’s Hearing Room on the first floor 

of the NRC’s One White Flint building at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. Agency staff and 

utility representatives will discuss Edison’s plan to submit a license amendment request that 

would address compliance with the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station’s Unit 2 Technical 

Specifications, as discussed in the staff’s request for additional information dated Dec. 26, 2012 

(ML12361A065). No license amendment request has yet been filed, and no restart decisions will 

be made during the meeting.

Each year, the NRC’s review process includes numerous public meetings between the 

staff and licensees on technical matters being reviewed by agency headquarters staff. It’s not 

possible to bring all these meetings to the communities near the plants in question, so the staff 

will make a webcast and phone line available for this meeting so that people near San Onofre can 

observe the review process in action and ask the NRC staff questions. 

The teleconference number is 888-677-3916 and the passcode is 2670631. Callers will 

initially be placed in a “listen only” status. At the designated point in the agenda, two-way 

calling will be enabled, so that the public may ask the NRC staff questions regarding issues from 

the meeting. 

The two San Onofre reactors have been shut down since January 2012, when a leak in a 

Unit 3 steam generator led to the discovery of unexpected wear in both reactors’ steam 

generators. The NRC issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to Southern California Edison in 

March 2012, requiring several actions by the utility before the agency would consider allowing 

the plant to restart. 

Note to Editors: To facilitate security screening, media interested in attending the meeting in 

Rockville can contact the Office of Public Affairs at 301-415-8200.

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 13-019 March 22, 2013
News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
P. 1


# OAR Box 1107 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 4DIV-C-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-81-2 1

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:46

PM Sheet 41 of 90P. 2 

# A-81- 2 IV-C-1 0
f. t ) *>•-•• _

Mr . JosephC . Ledvin a j Director , Environmenta l Activitie s \ Vist a Chemica l Company

' 1599 0 Nort hBarker' s Landin g Roa d Pos t Offic e Bo x1902 9 Houston , Texa s 7722 4 ; | Dea r Mr . Ledvina : I Thi s i s t o acknowledg e receip t o f you r letter , date dJul y 16 , 1985 , j respondin g t o ou r reques t fo r additiona l informatio noncomment s pertainin g t o th e viny l chlorid e standar drevisions . You r lette r ha s bee nplace di nj ou r confidentia l fil e an d wil l b e handle daccordin g t o guideline s governin g j

t t treatmen t o f confidentia l busines s information . Thi s additiona l informatio nj i wil l b e considere dalon g wit hpreviousl y submitte dcomment s a s w e develo p! fina l revision s t o th e standard . You r cooperatio ni nprovidin g th e requeste dinformatio ni s appreciated . j

• Sincerely , j Rober t L . Aja x Chie f Standard s Developmen t Branc h OAQPS/ESED/SDB : WFDimmick , r m 1043 , NCM , 541-557 8 (Radian/KKFidler/ibunn/541-9100/07-25-85 )
#### § 1509.100 What does this part do?

This part carries out the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.,* as amended) that applies to grants. It also applies the provisions of the Act to cooperative agreements and other financial assistance awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy.
#### § 1508.990 Preponderance of the evidence.

*Preponderance of the evidence* means proof by information that, compared with information opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probably true than not.
No: IV-16-009 April 8, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

 

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Entergy Operations, Inc.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Entergy Operations, 

Inc. The company has agreed to a series of actions following an investigation that determined that 

workers at the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant failed to perform fire inspections and falsified records.

The Confirmatory Order is a result of the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) 

process, which was requested by the company to address violations identified by the NRC in a 

December 14, 2015, inspection report. The ADR process involves mediation facilitated by a neutral 

third party with no decision-making authority who assists the NRC and a licensee in reaching 

agreement when there are differences regarding an enforcement action.

The NRC determined that on multiple occasions between July 2013 and April 2014, seven 

contract workers falsified records showing they had performed fire inspections they never conducted. 

In addition, an Entergy supervisor willfully failed to identify and take corrective actions when provided 

with information of suspected wrongdoing by contract fire watch personnel. A contractor manager also 

willfully provided incomplete and inaccurate information to a plant security officer investigating the 

trustworthiness and reliability of a contract worker who performed fire watches.

The NRC requires licensees to conduct tours of specific plant areas on a regularly scheduled 

basis to ensure that fires do not occur in areas that could damage vital plant equipment. Licensees are 

required to keep logs certifying that the inspections have been conducted and document any adverse 

conditions discovered.

In light of significant corrective actions Entergy has taken, the NRC has not issued a Notice of 

Violation or a civil penalty. Entergy agreed to complete a fleet-wide review of its fire watch programs 

over the past five years; establish a corporate lead for oversight of the company’s fire watch programs; 

and improve training programs according to timelines established in the Confirmatory Order.

The Confirmatory Order is publicly available through the Agency Documents and Management 

System (ADAMS) on the NRC website.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Baldwin, Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 112]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered April 7, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of auto stripping in the second degree and possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in removing de*135fendant from the courtroom during the suppression hearing. Defendant continually disrupted the hearing despite repeated warnings to cease his outbursts. Although the court did not specifically warn defendant that continued misconduct would result in removal *(see,*CPL 260.20), such a warning was unnecessary under the circumstances. Moreover, defendant’s outbursts included an explicit demand to be removed. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
§ 151.3 Types of insurance coverage required. ( a ) Every person subject to the Act and every mission shall have and maintain with respect to any motor vehicle, vessel or aircraft owned by, leased to, or furnished for the regular use of every such person or mission liability insurance in accordance with the form, terms, and conditions provided for in these regulations.
( b ) The insurance shall provide coverage against the following risks to third parties arising from the ownership, maintenance, or use in the United States of any motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft: ( 1 ) Bodily injury, including death;
( 2 ) Property damage, including loss of use; and
( 3 ) Any additional coverage required to be included in liability insurance policies by the jurisdiction where the motor vehicle, vessel or aircraft is principally garaged, berthed, or kept, such as uninsured motorist coverage or first party no-fault coverage.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

FILE MOTION AND SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Class member Thomas Chowattukunnel’s motion to opt out of the class action has been

received. Leave to file the motion is GRANTED. The following briefing schedule will govern. 

Any oppositions should be filed no later than NOON ON FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2010. Counsel for

class member Chowattukunnel may file a reply BY NOON ON TUESDAY, MAY 4, 2010. All briefs

should be double-spaced and be no longer than five pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 719 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Vivian Wright, Respondent, v. Harold Plant, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed unless records and appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before October 14, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before November 17, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at November 1960 Term.
#### § 1508.955 Indictment.

*Indictment* means an indictment for a criminal offense. A presentment, information, or other filing by a competent authority charging a criminal offense shall be given the same effect as an indictment.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Legacey  Technology  Holdings,
     Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 31, 2011 as
     filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report") I, Redgie Green, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
     Officer,  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section  1350,  as
     adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
     the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: July 18, 2012


/s/Redgie Green
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: (Chief Executive Officer/Principal
Accounting Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0597

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CAVEY LITTLE ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 26 2023

06/26/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0597
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75555-75556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4901-N-51]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: December 17, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.


[[Page 75556]]


    Dated: December 9, 2004.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 04-27401 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
(PAGE) 1
                             Exhibit 21.1
                             SUBSIDIARIES
                    THE SABRE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.



THE SABRE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
 (EACH SUBSIDIARY'S SUBSIDIARIES OUTLINED FURTHER BELOW)*

   The SABRE Group, Inc.  (Delaware)

THE SABRE GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
   
   Axess International Network, Inc. (Japan) (25%)
   ENCOMPASS Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   Prize Ltd. (Latvia) (50%)
   SABRE Decision Technologies International, Inc. (Delaware)
   SABRE Decision Technologies Licensing, Inc. (Delaware)
   SABRE International Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
   SABRE International, Inc. (Delaware)
   SST Finance, Inc. (Delaware)
   SST Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   TSGL, Inc. (Delaware)
   Ticketnet Corporation (Canada)
   SABRE Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware)
   The SABRE Group Sales (Barbados), Ltd.
   SABRE Technology Enterprises, Ltd. (Cayman Island)
   SABRE Technology Holland B.V.

ENCOMPASS HOLDING, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   ENCOMPASS (partnership) (50%)

SABRE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Decision Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd.
(PAGE) 2
SABRE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   SABRE Belgium (Belgium) (99%)
   SABRE Computer-Reservierungssystem GmbH (Austria)
   SABRE Danmark ApS (Denmark)
   SABRE Deutschland Marketing GmbH (Germany)
   SABRE Deutschland Services GmbH (Germany)
   SABRE Espana Marketing, S.A. (Spain) (99%)
   SABRE Europe Management Services Ltd. (UK) (99%)
   SABRE France Sarl (France)
   SABRE Hellas SA (Greece)
   SABRE Ireland Limited (Ireland)
SABRE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES* - CONTINUED

   SABRE Italia S.r.l. (Italy) (99%)
   SABRE Marketing Nederland B.V. (The Netherlands)
   SABRE Norge AS (Norway)
   SABRE Portugal Servicos LDA (Portugal) (99%)
   SABRE Servicios Colombia LTDA (Columbia) (99%)
   SABRE Suomi Oy (Finland)
   SABRE Sverige AB (Sweden)
   SABRE UK Marketing Ltd. (UK) (99%)
   STIN Luxembourg S.A. (Luxembourg) (99%)

SABRE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   SABRE Belgium (Belgium) (1%)
   SABRE Espana Marketing, S.A. (Spain) (1%)
   SABRE Europe Management Services Ltd. (UK) (1%)
   SABRE Italia S.r.l. (Italy) (1%)
   SABRE Portugal Servicos LDA (Portugal) (1%)
   SABRE Servicios Colombia LTDA (Columbia) (1%)
   SABRE UK Marketing Ltd. (UK) (1%)
   STIN Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg) (1%)
         
SST HOLDING, INC. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Sociedad Tecnologica S.A. (Mexico) (51%)
   
SABRE SOCIEDAD TECNOLOGICA S.A. SUBSIDIARY*
   
   SABRE Services Administration (Mexico)

SABRE TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES, LTD. SUBSIDIARY*

   SABRE Technology Enterprises II, Ltd.
   The SABRE Group International (BAHRAIN) W.L.L.

TSGL, INC. SUBSIDIARIES*

   TSGL Holding, Inc. (Delaware)
   TSGL-SCS, Inc. (Delaware)

TICKETNET CORPORATION SUBSIDIARY*

   148548 Canada, Inc. (Canada)


*   All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise noted in
parenthesis
Editorial Note on Part 202
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 202 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 202.7 Documentation required for reimbursement. Claims for reimbursement of freight charges must be supported by the following documents: ( a ) *Voucher SF 1034.* “Public Voucher for Purchases and Services Other than Personal”—Voucher SF 1034 in original and three copies to be prepared by the agency requesting reimbursement of freight charges.
( b ) *Bills of lading* —(1) *To ports of entry.* Where the shipment is made to a port of entry, ocean or charter party bill of lading (or photostat) evidencing shipment from an eligible port of export as prescribed in § 202.2(a) to the port of entry. The bill of lading shall indicate the carrier's complete statement of charges including all relevant weights, cubic measurements, rates, and any applicable tariff surcharges. (2) *To points of entry.* (i) Where the shipment is made to a point of entry and through bills of lading to designated point of entry are not issued, an ocean or charter party bill of lading (or photostat) evidencing shipment from an eligible port of export as precribed in § 202.2(a) to the port of discharge, and a receipted copy of the rail, truck, or barge bills of lading (or other acceptable commercial document) covering the transportation of the supplies from the ocean carrier's point of delivery at port of discharge to point of entry in recipient country, correctly assessed at time of loading by the land carrier for freight on a weight, measurement, or unit basis to point of entry in recipient country and from point of entry to point of delivery in the recipient country. The bill of lading shall indicate the carrier's complete statement of charges including all relevant weights, cubic measurements, rates and any applicable tariff surcharges. ( ii ) Where shipment is made to point of entry and through bills of lading are issued, a receipted copy of the through bill of lading evidencing shipment from an eligible port of export as prescribed in § 202.2(a) to point of entry in the recipient country. The bill of lading shall include the carrier's complete statement of charges including all relevant weights, cubic measurements, rates, and any applicable tariff surcharges.
( c ) *Receipted invoices.* One copy (or photostat) of the detailed invoice of the supplier of the transportation evidencing payment by the agency to the carrier. If the bills of lading required by paragraph (b) of this section meet the requirements of this subparagraph, no invoice is required.
( d ) *Voluntary Agency and Carrier Certificate, Form AID 1550-1.* ( i ) As provided in § 202.4(a), the original and two copies of the Voluntary Agency and Carrier Certificate executed by the supplier of ocean transportation, and
( ii ) As provided in § 202.4(b), the original and two copies of the Voluntary Agency and Carrier Certificate executed by the Agency.