alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 270.5b-2 Exclusion of certain guarantees as securities of the guarantor. ( a ) For the purposes of section 5 of the act, a guarantee of a security shall not be deemed to be a security issued by the guarantor: *Provided,* That the value of all securities issued or guaranteed by the guarantor, and owned by the management company, does not exceed 10 percent of the value of the total assets of such management company.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, for the purposes of section 5 of the Act, a guarantee by a railroad company of a security issued by a terminal company, warehouse company, switching company, or bridge company, shall not be deemed to be a security issued by such railroad company: *Provided:* ( 1 ) The security is guaranteed jointly or severally by more than one railroad company; and
( 2 ) No one of such guaranteeing railroad companies directly or indirectly controls all of its co-guarantors.
( c ) For the purposes of section 5 of the Act, a lease or other arrangement whereby a railroad company is or becomes obligated to pay a stipulated annual sum of rental either to another railroad company or to the security holders of such other railroad company shall not be deemed in itself a guarantee.
[Rule N-5B-2, 10 FR 581, Jan. 16, 1945]
§ 192.12 Administration of benefits. ( a ) The amount deducted from the pay and allowances of captives must be recorded in the individual accounts of the agency concerned. A Treasury designated account, set up on the books of the agency concerned, may be utilized by the head of an agency to report the net amount of pay, allowances and interest credited to captives pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5569(b). Interest payments under this section shall be paid out of funds available for salaries and expenses of the agency. Interest shall be computed at a rate for any calendar quarter equal to the average rate paid on United States Treasury bills with 3-month maturities issued during the preceding calendar quarter, with quarterly compounding.
( b ) Cash payments to captives for each day of captivity shall be made by the head of an agency before the end of the one-year period beginning on the date on which the captive status terminates. In the event the captive dies in captivity or prior to payment of these benefits, payment shall be made to the eligible survivors under § 192.51(c) or the estate. A payment under this subchapter may be deferred or denied by the head of an agency pending determination of an offense committed by the captive under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8312.
§ 229.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 229.300 through §§ 229.310 apply, except as provided in § 229.225 and § 229.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 229.300 through 229.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 229.300 through 229.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 229.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
#### Edward J. Kovacs et al., Respondents, v. Countess Mara, Inc., et al., Appellants.

The question of whether Hilda R. Kovacs had authority to execute the alleged new contract with plaintiff Edward J. Kovacs, containing an agreement to rescind the old contract, does not here arise, for neither he nor the vice-president, Hilda R. Kovacs, presumed to act upon her authority, but called upon the president, and they are bound by her alleged authorization. On said plaintiff's own version of the alleged novation, he neither requested, nor did Mrs. Whitman (the president of both corporations) direct, that a contract be given him by Countess Mara, Inc. The question of whether the execution of the alleged new contract with Countess Mara Manufacturing Corporation was, in fact, authorized must await the trial. The alleged oral contract on which plaintiffs Hilda R. Kovacs and Lillian Rothman sue is too vague and indefinite to establish a binding promise. Further, since the alleged contract was unilateral, the defendant Lueilla de Y. Whitman might at any time before complete performance withdraw her offer. These plaintiffs were employees and officers of Countess Mara, Inc., and as such were required to exercise their best efforts in its behalf. Their position, therefore, was not affected by the offer of the defendant Lueilla de Y. Whitman or its subsequent withdrawal. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, pp. 1002, 1055.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC.

This patent covers a wide variety of technical arts including: The detection and tracking of moving targets in a given video input stream for surveillance and reconnaissance purposes.

Under the authority of Section 11(a) of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or processes covered by this patent.

*Title:*                         Moving Target Indication Algorithm for Video Surveillance Applications.                    

*Inventors:*                         Alex Chan.                    

*Patent Number:*                         Provisional Application, Registration No. 39,612.                    

*Issued Date:*                         Filed September 13, 2004.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norma Cammarata, Technology Transfer Office, AMSRD-ARL-DP-T, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-1197, tel: (301) 394-2952, fax: (301) 394-5818.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-27570 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### Bela Fabian, Respondent, v. Amerikai Magyar Szo (Hungarian Word, Inc.), Appellant.

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Concur — McFally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.; Breitel, J. P. and Valente, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion to dismiss the complaint in the following memorandum by Valente, J.: We would reverse the order and grant defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. *642The language of the portion of the article in defendant’s newspaper, about which plaintiff complains, is not libelous as a matter of law. (See *Tracy*v. *Newsday, 5 N*Y 2d 134.) Moreover, plaintiff is not specifically mentioned in the article; there is no description of him or any identification of his calling or occupation which could reasonably identify him. In *Gross*v. *Cantor*(270 N. Y, 93, 96) it was held that an impersonal reproach of an indeterminate class is not actionable by an individual. There is no reference in the article to any specific group with which plaintiff could be identified. [22 Misc 2d 317.]
### §§2515 to 2525. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 2515 to 2525 terminated as of Aug. 31, 1965, pursuant to section 2525 of this title.

Section 2515, Pub. L. 87–27, §18, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 60, set forth penalties for violations of this chapter.

Section 2516, Pub. L. 87–27, §19, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 61, provided for employment of expediters and administrative employees.

Section 2517, Pub. L. 87–27, §20, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 61, provided that Secretary of Commerce maintain as a permanent record a list of applications approved for financial assistance and for public inspection thereof.

Section 2518, Pub. L. 87–27, §21, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 61, provided for labor standards for laborers and mechanics; their rate of wages and overtime and for enforcement thereof.

Section 2519, Pub. L. 87–27, §22, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 62, provided for an annual report to Congress and for contents thereof.

Section 2520, Pub. L. 87–27, §23, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 62, authorized appropriations necessary to carry out provisions of this chapter.

Section 2521, Pub. L. 87–27, §24, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 62; Pub. L. 87–793, title II, §607(a)(4), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 849, provided for use of other available services and facilities of other agencies and instrumentalities of Federal Government and for rules and regulations governing said use.

Section 2522, Pub. L. 87–27, §25, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 63, stated that each recipient of assistance under this chapter shall keep such records as Secretary shall prescribe and provided for audit of such records by Federal Government.

Section 2523, Pub. L. 87–27, §27, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 63, provided that Secretary shall establish and conduct a continuing program of study and research and shall include in his annual report to Congress his findings resulting therefrom and his recommendations for legislative and other action.

Section 2524, Pub. L. 87–27, §28, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 63, defined "State", "States", and "United States" as used in this chapter.

Section 2525, Pub. L. 87–27, §29, May 1, 1961, 75 Stat. 63; Pub. L. 89–55, June 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 195, stated that termination date of this chapter and all authority conferred thereunder shall be Aug. 31, 1965, and that Secretary of the Treasury shall be responsible for liquidation of affairs and functions conducted under this chapter.
#### Mertylin Carroll, Appellant, v Octavious Williams, Respondent.

[715 NYS2d 911]

—In an action to recover damages for trespass, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated August 4, 1999, which denied her motion to compel the defendant and a nonparty witness to submit to an examination before trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to give notice requesting an oral examination of the defendant and the nonparty witness. Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion to compel the defendant and the nonparty witness to submit to an examination was premature and the Supreme Court properly denied it *(see,*CPLR 3107, 3124). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Second Department,

June, 1949.

(June 1, 1949.)

#### Saul Rabinovitz, Appellant, v. Allan C. Williamson et al., as Administrators with the Will Annexed of Charles D. Strang, Deceased, Respondents. David Rosen, Landlord, v. Saul Rabinovitz, Tenant, and “ John Doe,” Undertenant.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 841.]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 72179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10 a.m., Friday, December 2, 2011.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, (202) 418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-30265 Filed 11-18-11; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,481
<PP&E>                                           1,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,232
<SALES>                                         11,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,508
<CGS>                                            7,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (72)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (293)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1501.5 Substantive rules of general applicability.

ADF's regulations published under the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are found in chapter XV of title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register. These regulations are supplemented from time to time by amendments appearing initially in the Federal Register.
#### Genesee Valley Union Trust Company, as Trustee Under the Will of Max Russer, Deceased, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 35874.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for damages for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
#### Renee Francisco et al., Respondents, v General Motors Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. *9751.)

[716 NYS2d 630]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Eric D.*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Allegany County, Cosgrove, J.— Discovery.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
§ 146.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
#### Peter J. Johnson, Appellant, v. Emanuel Gianino, Respondent.

Appellant complains that during the course of the trial, defendant’s attorney, on cross-examination of plaintiff and on direct examination of one of defendant’s witnesses, improperly brought out the fact that a claim had been made by plaintiff against his employer, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In our opinion the references to workmen’s compensation, complained of, were unnecessary and improper. *(Regan*v. *Frontier Elevator & Mill Co.,*211 App. Div. 164; *Zimber*v. *Kress,*225 App. Div. 16, 18.) However, the record discloses that appellant’s attorney himself brought out, by a request to charge, and by a statement made on trial, the fact that plaintiff had received such compensation and that the compensation carrier had a lien on any recovery by plaintiff, in the sum of $2,461.15. Plaintiff’s attorney also excepted to a charge by the trial court that in reaching a verdict the jury should not consider the amount of the compensation lien. Under the circumstances disclosed, it is our opinion that plaintiff’s attorney waived the objection which he had originally made to the mention of compensation insurance, and may not now complain of the result which he claims was effected thereby. Moreover, under all the circumstances disclosed, no substantial right of plaintiff was affected. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 106.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
### §2996k. Coordination

The President may direct that appropriate support functions of the Federal Government may be made available to the Corporation in carrying out its activities under this subchapter, to the extent not inconsistent with other applicable law.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title X, §1012, as added Pub. L. 93–355, §2, July 25, 1974, 88 Stat. 388.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 11874. Delegation of Functions to Director of Office of Management and Budget

Ex. Ord. No. 11874 eff. July 25, 1975, 40 F.R. 31737, provided:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 1012 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, as amended by the Legal Services Corporation Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 388, 42 U.S.C. 2996k), and Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, and as President of the United States, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget is hereby designated and empowered to exercise the authority vested in the President by said Section 1012 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, as amended [this section], to direct that appropriate support functions of the Federal Government may be made available to the Legal Services Corporation in carrying out its activities, to the extent not inconsistent with other applicable law. Such functions shall be provided under terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the Legal Services Corporation and the Federal agencies involved.

Gerald R. Ford.