alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 126.7 Exemption for defense trade and cooperation among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. ( a ) No license or other approval is required for the export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import of defense articles, the performance of defense services, or engaging in brokering activities as described in part 129 of this subchapter, between or among authorized users of this exemption, subject to the requirements and limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The exemption described in paragraph (a) of this section is subject to the following requirements and limitations: ( 1 ) The activity must be to or within the physical territory of Australia, the United Kingdom, or the United States;
( 2 ) The transferor, recipient, or broker must each be: ( i ) U.S. persons registered with the applicable Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) registration pursuant to §§ 122.1 and 129.3 of this subchapter, and not debarred under § 127.7 of this subchapter;
( ii ) A U.S. Government department or agency; or
( iii ) Authorized users identified through the DDTC website and, if engaging in brokering activities, registered with DDTC pursuant to § 129.3 of this subchapter;
( 3 ) The defense article or defense service is not identified in supplement no. 2 to this part as ineligible for transfer under the exemption in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 4 ) The value of the transfer does not exceed the amounts described in § 123.15 of this subchapter and does not involve the manufacturing abroad of significant military equipment as described in § 124.11 of this subchapter; and
( 5 ) Transferors must comply with the requirements of § 123.9(b) of this subchapter.
Note 1 to paragraph ( b
):
The exemption in paragraph (a) of this section does not remove other applicable U.S. statutory and regulatory requirements. For example, for U.S. authorized users, transfers of classified defense articles and defense services must still meet the requirements in 32 CFR part 117, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), in addition to all other applicable laws. Australian authorized users must, for example, meet the requirements in the Australian Protective Security Policy Framework, including appropriate security risk management for contracted providers. United Kingdom authorized users must, for example, meet the requirements in the Government Functional Standards GovS 007: Security.
[89 FR 67290, Aug. 20, 2024]
§ 1508.75 Do terms in this part have special meanings? This part uses terms throughout the text that have special meaning. Those terms are defined in Subpart I of this part. For example, three important terms are— ( a ) *Exclusion or excluded,* which refers only to discretionary actions taken by a suspending or debarring official under this part or the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4);
( b ) *Disqualification or disqualified,* which refers to prohibitions under specific statutes, executive orders (other than Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689), or other authorities. Disqualifications frequently are not subject to the discretion of an agency official, may have a different scope than exclusions, or have special conditions that apply to the disqualification; and
( c ) *Ineligibility or ineligible,* which generally refers to a person who is either excluded or disqualified.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jennie Navasky as Administratrix C. T. A. of the Estate of Lizzie Birnbaum, Also Known as Lizzie Wilner, Deceased, Respondent. Boris J. Friedkiss, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to vacate an order of this court dismissing the appeal, to extend his time to perfect the appeal, and to dispense with printing. Motion denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00100-CV

No. 05-19-00101-CV

No. 05-19-00102-CV

IN RE KENTRAIL R. MCCUIN, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F-12-51308-L, F-12-51309-L, and F-12-51310-L

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Schenck

In 2012, relator was convicted by a jury of evading arrest or detention, unlawful possession 

of a firearm by a felon, and possession with intent to deliver more than one gram and less than four 

grams of cocaine in a drug-free zone while using or exhibiting a deadly weapon. McCuin v. State, 

Nos. 05-12-01148-CR, 05-12-01149-CR & 05-12-01150-CR, 2013 WL 3929215 (Tex. App.—

Dallas July 26, 2013, no pet.) (not designated for publication). The trial court assessed punishment 

at two years’ imprisonment in the evading case, five years’ imprisonment in the firearm case, and 

twenty years’ imprisonment in the delivery case, and ordered that the sentences be served 

consecutively. Id. This Court affirmed his convictions. Id. Relator did not challenge the cumulation 

order in his appeal. Id. In this original proceeding, relator complains that the consecutive sentences 

constitute an improper cumulation order. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court 

to set aside the cumulation order. 
–2–

This proceeding is a collateral attack on a final conviction and, therefore, falls within the 

scope of a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; see In re Colbert, No. 05-18-00340-CV, 2018 

WL 1704149, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 9, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (court lacked 

jurisdiction over mandamus proceeding seeking writ directing trial court to vacate cumulation 

order from final felony conviction); In re Taylor, No. 12-12-00240-CR, 2012 WL 3201959, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Tyler Aug. 8, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing original proceeding for 

want of jurisdiction where relator sought order directing the trial court to vacate cumulation order 

and reform the judgment to reflect that sentences are to run concurrently). Only the Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final, post-conviction felony proceedings. TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

2001, orig. proceeding). Because the relief sought in relator’s petition relates to post-conviction 

relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to consider his petition 

for writ of mandamus. In re Colbert, 2018 WL 1704149, at *1; see also In re Taylor, 2012 WL 

3201959, at *1. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

190100F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

SUZANNE Y. MITCHEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of

the United States Department of Justice, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-00205 MEJ

ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR

FURTHER SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

On March 9, 2010, the Court issued an order on the parties’ summary judgment motions. 

(Dkt. #51.) As the case remains pending, the Court finds it appropriate for the parties to participate

in a further settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Chen prior to scheduling this matter for

trial. Accordingly, this matter is hereby REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Chen to conduct a further

settlement conference at his earliest convenience. The parties shall file a joint status report within

14 days of completion of the settlement process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-00205-MEJ Document 52 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1006.510 Who maintains the EPLS?

In accordance with the OMB guidelines, the General Services Administration (GSA) maintains the *EPLS.* When a Federal agency takes an action to exclude a person under the nonprocurement or procurement debarment and suspension system, the agency enters the information about the excluded person into the *EPLS.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1549-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 3, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 15, 2004:

Calhoun County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,

*Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.*

[FR Doc. 04-27136 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 1006.110 What is the purpose of the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system? ( a ) To protect the public interest, the Federal Government ensures the integrity of Federal programs by conducting business only with responsible persons.
( b ) A Federal agency uses the nonprocurement debarment and suspension system to exclude from Federal programs persons who are not presently responsible.
( c ) An exclusion is a serious action that a Federal agency may take only to protect the public interest. A Federal agency may not exclude a person or commodity for the purposes of punishment.
#### § 140.12 Interagency review procedures.

If the agency proposing the assistance disagrees with a determination by the Country Narcotics Coordinator to withhold assistance or take other measures, the agency may request that the determination be reviewed by the Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs in coordination with other appropriate bureaus and agencies. Unless otherwise determined by the Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, the assistance shall continue to be withheld pending resolution of the review.
#### § 1509.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernestine Foster, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, rendered May 11, 1959, convicting her of assault in the third degree (Penal Law, § 244), and sentencing her to a term of 90 days in the Workhouse. Execution of the sentence was suspended. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### James Talcott, Inc., v. Winco Sales Corporation.

Motion to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal and the appellant’s points and permitting the appeal to be heard upon three printed copies of the case on appeal used in the Appellate Term plus six typewritten copies of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and upon typewritten appellant’s points upon condition that one typewritten copy of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and one typewritten copy of the appellant’s points are served upon the attorney for the respondent and six typewritten copies of the additional papers and of the appellant’s points are filed with this court together with three copies of the printed record on appeal used in the Appellate Term. Concur— Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or Carol Booker at (202) 401-3736.

Dated: February 4, 2004.

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04-2747  Filed 2-04-04; 3:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.14a-102 [Reserved]
#### § 127.5 Authority of the Defense Security Service.

In the case of exports involving classified technical data or defense articles, the Defense Security Service may take appropriate action to ensure compliance with the Department of Defense National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (unless such requirements are in direct conflict with guidance provided by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, in which case the latter guidance must be followed). Upon a request to the Defense Security Service regarding the export of any classified defense article or technical data, the Defense Security Service official or a designated government transmittal authority may require the production of other relevant documents and information relating to the proposed export.

[71 FR 20549, Apr. 21, 2006]
§ 130.8 Vendor. ( a ) *Vendor* means any distributor or manufacturer who, directly or indirectly, furnishes to an applicant or supplier defense articles valued in an amount of $500,000 or more which are end-items or major components as defined in § 120.45 of this subchapter. It also means any person who, directly or indirectly, furnishes to an applicant or supplier defense articles or services valued in an amount of $500,000 or more when such articles or services are to be delivered (or incorporated in defense articles or defense services to be delivered) to or for the use of the armed forces of a foreign country or international organization under: ( 1 ) A sale requiring a license or approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls under this subchapter; or
( 2 ) A sale pursuant to a contract with the Department of Defense under section 22 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2762).
( b ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 39323, July 22, 1993, as amended at 71 FR 20554, Apr. 21, 2006; 79 FR 61236, Oct. 10, 2014]
§ 37.404 Ability to obtain information. ( a ) A swap execution facility shall demonstrate that it has access to sufficient information to assess whether trading in swaps listed on its market, in the index or instrument used as a reference price, or in the underlying commodity for its listed swaps is being used to affect prices on its market.
( b ) A swap execution facility shall have rules that require its market participants to keep records of their trading, including records of their activity in the index or instrument used as a reference price, the underlying commodity, and related derivatives markets, and make such records available, upon request, to the swap execution facility or, if applicable, to its regulatory service provider, and the Commission.
United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) October 1, 2001


                    Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


              Bermuda                 1-4668                    None
----------------------------        -----------         ----------------
State or other jurisdiction        (Commission           (IRS employer
       of incorporation)           File Number)        Identification No.)


Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton HM  DX, BERMUDA        None
----------------------------------------------------------    -------
(Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (441) 295-1422


                   (Former name or former address, if changed
                              since last report.)


<PAGE>


                                    FORM 8-K

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.



Item 5.   Other Events

         On October 1, 2001, the Leon County Circuit Court in Coastal Petroleum
Company's lawsuit against the State of Florida on its own motion issued an order
scheduling a case management conference for Tuesday, November 27, 2001. The
order provides that counsel be prepared to discuss a discovery schedule, the
setting of a trial date, and several other matters.



Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

          (c)    Exhibits

         None.




<PAGE>





                                    FORM 8-K

                                   SIGNATURES


          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
                                (Registrant)



                              By /s/ Benjamin W. Heath
                             ---------------------------------------
                               Benjamin W. Heath
                               President

Date:  October 3, 2001
### §290cc–30. Technical assistance

The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary, shall provide technical assistance to eligible entities in developing planning and operating programs in accordance with the provisions of this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §530, as added Pub. L. 100–77, title VI, §611(3), July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 521; amended Pub. L. 101–645, title V, §511, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4731; Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §§162(2), 163(a)(3), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 102–352, §2(b)(2), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 939; Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9004(d), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–255 substituted "acting through the Assistant Secretary" for "through the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse".

1992—Pub. L. 102–352 repealed Pub. L. 102–321, §163(a)(3), which directed the substitution of "the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration" for "the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse".

Pub. L. 102–321, §162(2), which directed the substitution of "through the agencies of the Administration" for "through the National" and all that followed through "Abuse", was not executed because the word "Abuse" appeared in two places and because of the amendment by Pub. L. 114–255, which presumed that the substitution did not take place. See 2016 Amendment note above.

1990—Pub. L. 101–645 amended section generally, substituting provision relating to technical assistance for provision relating to disbursement and availability of funds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–321 effective Oct. 1, 1992, with provision for programs providing financial assistance, see section 801(c), (d) of Pub. L. 102–321, set out as a note under section 236 of this title.
#### § 120.59 [Reserved]
#### § 270.17d-2 Form for report by small business investment company and affiliated bank.

Form N-17D-1 is hereby prescribed as the form for reports required by paragraph (d)(3) of § 270.17d-1.

[26 FR 11240, Nov. 29, 1961]