alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

MARIA GURREONERO and JOSE GURREONERO,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1378

[August 31, 2022]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE-20-010803.

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

John S. Bernstein of Bernstein ǀ Polsky, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

CONNER, J.

Appellant, Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company 

(“Universal”), appeals the trial court’s order enforcing a judicially revised 

proposal for settlement (“PFS”) between it and Appellees, Maria and Jose 

Gurreonero (“Insureds”). Insureds concede error. We agree with 

Universal, and accept Insureds’ confession of error, that the trial court 

erred when it judicially altered Universal’s original PFS without Universal’s 

consent, permitted Insureds to accept the judicially altered PFS after the 

time to accept the original PFS had expired, and then ordered Universal to 

comply with the judicially altered PFS. See P & O Ports Fla., Inc. v. Cont’l 

Stevedoring & Terminals, Inc., 904 So. 2d 507, 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) 

(“[O]nce the trial court concluded that the parties could not change the 

provisions in the non-compete clause as a condition of the offer, it was 

error to strike the improper condition and to allow Continental to accept 

the judicially altered offer. We conclude that Continental was not free to 

accept the offer as modified by the court and P & O was not legally bound 

by its offer which had been materially altered by the court. Once the court 

changed the terms, there was no offer, as P & O clearly did not intend to 
2

make the monetary offer without the elimination of the non-compete 

provision.”) (internal citations omitted). Accordingly, we reverse and 

remand with instructions directing the trial court to: (1) strike paragraph 

three of its March 11, 2022 order, altering Universal’s original PFS; (2) 

vacate its May 16, 2022 enforcement order; and (3) conduct further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Allen, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 28, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Lane, Markewich and Sullivan, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Roger  Casas,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 15, 2005

                                                          /s/ Roger Casas
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Roger Casas
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 89-532.

#### Peat Marwick Main & Co. *v.*Holloway et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Reves*v. *Ernst & Young, ante,*p. 56.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 20, 2009



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ George Morris                    
| |  | George Morris
Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Exhibit 32.2
§ 1203.735-210 Gambling, betting, and lotteries. An employee shall not participate, while on Government-owned or leased property or while on duty for the Government, in any gambling activity including the operation of a gambling device, in conducting a lottery or pool, in a game for money or property, or in selling or purchasing a numbers slip or ticket. However, this section does not preclude activities: ( a ) Necessitated by an employee's law enforcement duties; or
( b ) Under section 3 of Executive Order 10927 and similar agency-approved activities.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gerald J. Burnett, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avistar Communications
Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended by this Form 10-K/A, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avistar
Communications Corporation.

|March 26, 2004 |  | By: /s/GERALD J. BURNETTGerald J. Burnett
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I,
Robert J. Habig, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avistar Communications Corporation on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended by this Form 10-K/A, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avistar Communications Corporation.

|March 26, 2004 |  | By: /s/ROBERT J. HABIGRobert J. Habig
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George P. Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 13, 2010


/s/ George MorrisGeorge MorrisChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLTFFS’ 1-7-10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

MASTER FILE NO.: C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2790228

DARRYL P. RAINS (CA SBN 104802) 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

Facsimile: 650.494.0792

Email: DRains@mofo.com 

DOROTHY L. FERNANDEZ (CA SBN 184266)

KIMBERLY L. TAYLOR (CA SBN 240483)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for defendants The Charles Schwab Corporation, 

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Investment 

Management, Inc., Schwab Investments, Charles R. Schwab, 

Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, Matthew 

Hastings, Mariann Byerwalter, Donald F. Dorward, William A. 

Hasler, Robert G. Holmes, Gerald B. Smith, Donald R. 

Stephens, and Michael W. Wilsey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CHARLES SCHWAB CORP. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Master File No. C-08-01510-WHA

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING, IN 

PART, PLAINTIFFS’ JANUARY 7, 2010, ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

Hearing: January 21, 2010

Time: 8:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

Courtroom: 9 

 Trial date: May 10, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 339 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLTFFS 1-7-10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

MASTER FILE NO. C-01510-WHA 1

sf-2790228

Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to file under seal (Dkt. No. 321) portions of 

Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Amend Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 319), 

and three exhibits to the Reply Declaration of Steve W. Berman In Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion 

(Dkt. No. 320). Certain information in these filings and accompanying exhibits has been 

designated as “Confidential” by defendants. Defendants have filed a declaration in support of maintaining the confidentiality of 

Exhibit 3 to the Berman Declaration. To the extent Exhibits 1 and 2 were designated as 

confidential, defendants have withdrawn that designation.

 Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to re-file the Berman Declaration with Exhibits 1 and 2 filed 

publicly and Exhibit 3 filed under seal. Plaintiffs are also ordered to publicly-file their Reply 

Memorandum without redactions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2010

 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 19

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 339 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2
### §19136. Rule of construction

Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to require public disclosure of information that is exempt from mandatory disclosure under section 552 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title IV, §10407, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1609.)
### §286b–2. National Medical Libraries Assistance Advisory Board

#### (a) Board of Regents of National Library of Medicine to serve as

The Board of Regents of the National Library of Medicine shall also serve as the National Medical Libraries Assistance Advisory Board (hereafter in this subpart referred to as the "Board").

#### (b) Functions

The Board shall advise and assist the Secretary in the preparation of general regulations and with respect to policy matters arising in the administration of this subpart.

#### (c) Use of services of members by Secretary

The Secretary may use the services of any member of the Board, in connection with matters related to the administration of this part for such periods, in addition to conference periods, as the Secretary may determine.

#### (d) Compensation

Appointed members of the Board who are not otherwise in the employ of the United States, while attending conferences of the Board or otherwise serving at the request of the Secretary in connection with the administration of this subpart, shall be entitled to receive compensation, per diem in lieu of subsistence, and travel expenses in the same manner and under the same conditions as that prescribed under section 210(c) of this title when attending conferences, traveling, or serving at the request of the Secretary in connection with the Board's function under this section.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §471, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 860.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Boards

Advisory boards established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a board established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such board is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a board established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law. See sections 1001(2) and 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Pub. L. 93–641, §6, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2275, set out as a note under section 217a of this title, provided that an advisory committee established pursuant to the Public Health Service Act shall terminate at such time as may be specifically prescribed by an Act of Congress enacted after Jan. 4, 1975.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                REDENVELOPE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Wong, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ ERIC C. WONG
------------------------------------
Eric C. Wong
Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2004
§ 1102.9 Annual report to Congress. ( a ) On or before March 1 of each calendar year the Commissioner shall submit a report covering the preceding calendar year to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and President of the Senate for referral to the appropriate committees of the Congress. The report shall include: ( 1 ) The number of determinations made by the section not to comply with request for records made to the section under the Act and this part and the reasons for each such determination.
( 2 ) The number of appeals made by persons under the Act and this part, the result of such appeals, and the reason for the action upon each appeal that results in a denial of information.
( 3 ) The names and titles or positions of each person responsible for the denial of records requested under the Act, and the number of instances of participation for each.
( 4 ) The results of each proceeding conducted pursuant to 552(1)(4)(F) of the Act, including a report of the disciplinary action taken against the officer or employee who was primarily responsible for improperly withholding records or an explanation of why disciplinary action was not taken.
( 5 ) A copy of this part.
( 6 ) A copy of the fee schedule and the total amount of fees collected by the section for making records available under the Act.
( 7 ) Such other information as indicates efforts to administer fully the Act.
( b ) A copy of each such report to the Congress made pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section will be made available for public inspection and copying in the office of the FOIA Officer, United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, 4171 North Mesa, Suite C-310, El Paso, TX 79902-1422.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERT RAMIREZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00298-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20090D03210)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until May 11, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Gandara, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 11, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16

th day of April, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
HOWARD 

ROME 

MARTIN 

&

RIDLEY LLP

1775 WOODSIDE ROAD, SUITE 200 

REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94061 

TELEPHONE (650) 365-7715

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BEREHANU H. CHALLA [SBN: 179405] 

LAW OFFICES OF BEREHANU H. CHALLA 

424 Callan Avenue # 127 

San Leandro, CA 94577 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MARVIN CONLEY and minors MARLIN and 

MARVISHA CONLEY, through their guardian 

ad litem MARVIN CONLEY 

JOSEPH C. HOWARD, JR. [SBN: 050784] 

TODD H. MASTER [SBN: 185881] 

MELISSA M. HOLMES [SBN: 200961] 

HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP 

1775 Woodside Road, Suite 200 

Redwood City, CA 94061 

Telephone: (650) 365-7715 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARVIN CONLEY, MARLIN CONLEY, 

MARVISHA CONLEY, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

REDWOOD CITY; REDWOOD CITY 

POLICE DEPARTMENT;OFFICER S. 

SYSUM; MS. ROSEMARY WILLIAMS; 

MRS. RHONDA WILLIAMS COKER; and 

DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C08-2101 VRW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DEPOSIT 

MONEY INTO BLOCKED ACCOUNT 

FOR MARVISHA CONLEY 

DATE: January 7, 2010 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

DEPT.: 17th FL; CrtRm 6 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the money that belongs to Marvisha Conley shall be 

deposited into an interest bearing, federally insured blocked account or accounts. Each account 

shall indicate the name of the minor who owns the account. The total amount authorized for 

deposit, including accrued interest is $2,300.00. 

________________ 

[Proposed] Order to Deposit Money into Blocked Account for Marvisha Conley; Case No. C08-2101 

1

Case 3:08-cv-02101-VRW Document 67 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
________________ 

[Proposed] Order to Deposit Money into Blocked Account for Marvisha Conley; Case No. C08-2101 

2

HOWARD 

ROME 

MARTIN 

&

RIDLEY LLP

1775 WOODSIDE ROAD, SUITE 200 

REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94061 

TELEPHONE (650) 365-7715

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

/// 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the blocked accounts belong to a minor, Marvisha 

Conley, born December 8, 2004. No withdrawals of principal or interest shall be made from the 

blocked account without a written order under the case name and number, signed by a judge, and 

bearing the seal of this Court, until the minor attains the age of 18 years. When the minor attains 

the age of 18 years, the depository, without further order of this Court, is authorized and directed to 

pay by check or draft directly to the former minor, upon proper demand, all moneys including 

interest deposited under this order. The money on deposit is not subject to escheat. 

The petitioner’s attorney, if any, shall deliver a copy of this order to each depository in 

which funds are deposited under this order. The depository’s acknowledgment of receipt of the 

order and the funds shall be filed with the Court within 15 days of deposit. 

DATE: ____________________ 

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

January 7, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-02101-VRW Document 67 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4336 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion from 

gross income of discharges of qualified principal residence indebtedness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. HERGER, Mr. 

BERG, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. BRADY of 

Texas, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, and Mr. ROSKAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the exclusion from gross income of discharges of qualified 

principal residence indebtedness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS IN4 COME OF DISCHARGE OF QUALIFIED PRIN5 CIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

7 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend8 ed by striking ‘‘January 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

9 1, 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4336 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to indebtedness discharged after 

3 December 31, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Agenda

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

12 p.m. – 4 p.m. (EST)

Call-in: 866-299-3188, conference code: 2022330068

12:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions

 Mark Joyce, Associate Director

GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson

U.S. EPA Office of Diversity Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

 Board Members 

12:10 – 12:20 Overview of Agenda

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

12:20 – 1:00 Overview of Workgroup Progress

 Workgroup #1 – Define Ecological Restoration and Why It’s Important

Greg Eckert, Workgroup Chair

 Workgroup #2 - Review of Border Specific Programs and Where Ecological Restoration 

Resonates, Is Incorporated, Etc.

Cyrus Reed, Workgroup Chair

 Workgroup #3 - Review of Ecological Restoration Efforts with Federal Involvement 

Steve Niemeyer, Workgroup Chair

 Workgroup #4 - Review of Data/Tools/Performance Indicators/Models

Dave Anderson, Workgroup Chair

1:00 – 3:00 Discussion of Advice Letter Priorities and Workgroup Reorganization

3:00 – 3:40 Discussion of GNEB Advice Letter and Report

 Timeline

 Next steps

3:40 – 3:50 Other issues

 Spanish Translation of 15th Report 

3:50 – 4:00 Public Comments

4:00 Adjourn