alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 147
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019.

§ 147.6 Information and communication technology requirements. ( a ) *Development, procurement, maintenance, or use of ICT.* When developing, procuring, maintaining, or using ICT, the Department shall ensure, unless an undue burden would be imposed on the Department, that the ICT allows, regardless of the type of medium of the technology, that— ( 1 ) Individuals with disabilities who are Department employees have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access to and use of the information and data by Department employees who are not individuals with disabilities; and
( 2 ) Individuals with disabilities who are members of the public seeking information or services from the Department have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access to and use of the information and data by such members of the public who are not individuals with disabilities.
( b ) In meeting its obligations under paragraph (a) of this section, the Department shall comply with the Revised 508 Standards (36 CFR 1194.1 and appendices A, C and D to 36 CFR part 1194).
( c ) *Alternative means of access when undue burden is imposed.* When development, procurement, maintenance, or use of ICT that meets the standards as provided in 36 CFR part 1194.1 would impose an undue burden, the Department shall provide individuals with disabilities covered by this section with the relevant information and data by an alternative means of access that allows the individual to use the information and data.
( d ) *Procedures for determining undue burden.* The Department procedures for finding that full compliance with 36 CFR part 1194.1 would impose an undue burden can be found at: *http://www.state.gov/m/irm/impact/126338.htm .*
[81 FR 32646, May 24, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019]
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: September 30,2005

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    The Continental Corporation
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago,IL 60685


13F File Number:  28-172

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
November 15,2005
Chicago, Illinois,60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which The Continental Corporation exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of The Continental Corporation.
<Page>
#### § 138.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 47 ) ll-K - (B ) -3 5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 47 of 325P. 2 

# /A \ 

# (P) -< H-K-(B)-3 5
IERL-RT P SUPPOR T T O TH E INDUSTRIAL BOILE RNSP S - ENERGY , ENVIRONMENTA L FACTOR S FO RITA RTECHNOLOGIES . Lette r fro

m J.D . Mobley , EPArlER L t o A . Wehe , EPArSASD . May 7 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-3 5
§ 140.10 Intermediate credit institutions. ( a ) *Treatment as non-governmental entity or as a foreign government entity.* Intermediate credit institutions (“ICIs”) shall be subject to either the procedures applicable to foreign government entities or those applicable to non-governmental entities, depending on the nature of the specific entity. The Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs or the Assistant Secretary's designee, in consultation with the agency proposing the assistance and other appropriate bureaus and agencies, shall determine (consistent with the definition of “foreign state” set forth in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. 1603(a) and made applicable by § 140.5) whether the ICI will be treated as a non-governmental entity or a foreign government entity.
( b ) *Refunds.* In addition to measures required as a consequence of an ICI's treatment as a non-governmental entity or a foreign government entity, a clause shall be included in agreements with all ICIs requiring that any loan greater than $1,000 provided by the ICI to an individual or entity subsequently found to have been convicted of a narcotics offense or engaged in drug trafficking, as defined in this part, shall be subject to refund or recall.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,894
<SECURITIES>                                   454,140
<RECEIVABLES>                                  367,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,527
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               893,058
<PP&E>                                       1,425,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                 758,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,879,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,527
<BONDS>                                        317,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,311
<OTHER-SE>                                     928,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,879,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,734,988
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,274,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                340,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            211,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   211,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.10a-3 Number of copies—Filing—Signatures. ( a ) Three copies of every application pursuant to rule 10a-1 (§ 260.10a-1 of this chapter) and of every amendment thereto shall be filed with the Commission at its principal office.
( b ) One copy shall be manually signed by the applicant's duly authorized officer (or individual customarily performing similar functions with respect to any organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated).
[56 FR 22320, May 15, 1991]
§ 229.912 (Item 912) Source and amount of funds and transactional expenses. ( a ) State the source and total amount of funds or other consideration to be used in the roll-up transaction.
( b ) ( 1 ) Furnish a reasonably itemized statement of all expenses incurred or estimated to be incurred in connection with the roll-up transaction including, but not limited to, filing fees, legal, financial advisory, accounting and appraisal fees, solicitation expenses and printing costs. Identify the persons responsible for paying any or all of such expenses.
( 2 ) State whether or not any partnership subject to the roll-up transaction will be, directly or indirectly, responsible for any or all of the expenses of the transaction. If any partnership will be so responsible, state the amount to be provided by each partnership and the sources of capital to finance such amount.
( c ) If all or any part of the consideration to be used by the sponsor or successor in the roll-up transaction is expected to be, directly or indirectly, provided by any partnership, state the amount to be provided by each partnership and the sources of capital to finance such amount.
( d ) If all or any part of the funds or other consideration is, or is expected to be, directly or indirectly borrowed by the sponsor or successor for the purpose of the roll-up transaction: ( 1 ) Provide a summary of each such loan agreement containing the identity of the parties, the term, the collateral, the stated and effective interest rates, and other material terms or conditions; and
( 2 ) Briefly describe any plans or arrangements to finance or repay such borrowing, or, if no plans or arrangements have been made, make a statement to that effect.
( e ) If the source of all or any part of the funds to be used in the roll-up transaction is a loan made in the ordinary course of business by a bank as defined by section 3(a)(6) of the Exchange Act and section 13(d) or 14(d) is applicable to such transaction, the name of such bank shall not be made available to the public if the person filing the statement so requests in writing and files such request, naming such bank, with the Secretary of the Commission.
#### § 289.3 Reports with respect to proposed distribution of primary obligations.

The IFC shall file with the Commission, on or prior to the date on which it sells any of its primary obligations in connection with a distribution of such obligations in the United States, a report containing the information and documents specified in Schedule A of this part. The term “sell” as used in this section and in Schedule A of this Part means a completed sale, or a firm commitment to sell to an underwriter.
#### Paul Murray, administrator, defendant in error, v. Standard Pecan Company, plaintiff in error.

Action upon an agreement written upon the back of corporate stock sold to plaintiff’s intestate to repurchase such stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Edward Barry, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922.

Livingston & Whitmore, for plaintiff in error; Stella E. Whitmore, of counsel. Leslie J. Owen and Stone & Dick, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §292v. Provision by schools of information to students

#### (a) In general

With respect to loans made by a school under this subpart after June 30, 1986, each school, in order to carry out the provisions of sections 292q and 292r of this title, shall, at any time such school makes such a loan to a student under this subpart, provide thorough and adequate loan information on loans made under this subpart to the student. The loan information required to be provided to the student by this subsection shall include—

(1) the yearly and cumulative maximum amounts that may be borrowed by the student;

(2) the terms under which repayment of the loan will begin;

(3) the maximum number of years in which the loan must be repaid;

(4) the interest rate that will be paid by the borrower and the minimum amount of the required monthly payment;

(5) the amount of any other fees charged to the borrower by the lender;

(6) any options the borrower may have for deferral, cancellation, prepayment, consolidation, or other refinancing of the loan;

(7) a definition of default on the loan and a specification of the consequences which will result to the borrower if the borrower defaults, including a description of any arrangements which may be made with credit bureau organizations;

(8) to the extent practicable, the effect of accepting the loan on the eligibility of the borrower for other forms of student assistance; and

(9) a description of the actions that may be taken by the Federal Government to collect the loan, including a description of the type of information concerning the borrower that the Federal Government may disclose to (A) officers, employees, or agents of the Department of Health and Human Services, (B) officers, employees, or agents of schools with which the Secretary has an agreement under this subpart, or (C) any other person involved in the collection of a loan under this subpart.

#### (b) Statement regarding loan

Each school shall, immediately prior to the graduation from such school of a student who receives a loan under this subpart after June 30, 1986, provide such student with a statement specifying—

(1) each amount borrowed by the student under this subpart;

(2) the total amount borrowed by the student under this subpart; and

(3) a schedule for the repayment of the amounts borrowed under this subpart, including the number, amount, and frequency of payments to be made.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §726, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, §102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2020.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 726 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 293f of this title prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–408.

Another prior section 726 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 293f of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–484.
#### Warren E. Colburn and Fletcher A. Tinkham, trading as W. E. Colburn & Company, Defendants in Error, v. Commercial Security Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,195.

(Not to be reported in full.)

.Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon, Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 5, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action in tort in the- Municipal Court of Chicago by Warren B. Colburn and Fletcher A. Tinkham, trading as W. E. Colburn & Company, and carrying on the Merchants Exchange Bank, against the Commercial Security Company, a corporation, to recover $120 of the defendant and also to recover other amounts aggregating the sum of $45. The cause was tried before the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the hearing the court announced that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover any of the amounts aggregating *107$45, but as to the amount of $120 found the defendant guilty as charged in plaintiff’s statement of claim. Judgment was entered on the finding' and defendant brought error.

Abstract of the Decision.

I. Appeal and error, § *1403*
      ***
      *—what sufficient to support finding.*Where a statement of claim was for money collected by the defendant with notice of the plaintiff’s right thereto under a conditional contract of sale of a piano, and the defendant’s affidavit of merits admitted the collection, and alleged that the plaintiff elected to sue in trover for the then value of the contract, and obtained a judgment therefor which was paid, and such affidavit only made an issue of law that the plaintiffs were estopped from claiming the $120, and such theory was further evidenced by admissions in open court by the counsel for defendant, the admissions were sufficient to support a finding and judgment against the defendant, though no other evidence was introduced at the trial.

2. Election op remedies, § *Í3*—when suit not barred.*In an action to recover money collected by a defendant with notice of the plaintiffs! right thereto under a conditional -contract of sale of a piano, plaintiffs were not estopped from bringing their action by the fact that a prior action in replevin for the possession of the contract had been brought, and because plaintiff- afterwards elected to proceed in trover for the value of the contract, since when plaintiffs commenced, their action in replevin they could not have sued for the undesignated money paid on the contract, and since, under the facts, a separate right of action existed as to such money.

Reference should also be had to the case of *Colburn v. Commercial Security Co.,*172 Ill. App. 510, where the parties were the same.

John T. Booz, for plaintiff in error.

H. M. Matthews, for defendants in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
Map 3-12

National Monuments and National Conservation Areas

0 100 200 300 400

Miles

0 200 400 600 800

Miles

Sources: USDI BLM 2004c

Note: Coverage for BLM-administered lands is not available 

 for Texas, Nebraska, or Oklahoma

3-95

BLM-administered Lands

National Conservation Areas, Forest 

Reserves, Cooperative Management 

and Protection Areas, National 

Recreation Areas

Wild and Scenic Rivers

National Monuments

Wilderness Study Areas

Wilderness Areas
#### Harry C. Fleischer, Appellant, v. White Clover Dairy, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action by a passenger in a station wagon against its owner and operator and against the owner and operator of a milk truck which struck the station wagon in the rear, to recover damages for the personal *819injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result o£ such collision, plaintiff appeals from, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered March 10, 1960, in favor of defendants, upon the jury’s verdict after trial. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER ON MOTION TO RECUSE

Appellate case name: Dov K. Avni a/k/a Dov Avni Kaminetzky v. David A. Newman

Appellate case number: 01-13-00863-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-22875

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 6, 2014

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion to recuse is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting for the Court

The Court consists of: Justices Jennings, Keyes, Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: March 4, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6296-6307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA 225-03-8002]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and the Virginia 
Polytechnic Institute and State University to establish terms of 
collaboration to support shared interests that can proceed through a 
variety of programs, such as sabbaticals, postdoctoral fellowships, and 
student internships.

DATES: The agreement became effective March 13, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Pitts, Office of External 
Relations (HF-10), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-3330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements

[[Page 6297]]

and MOUs between FDA and others shall be published in the Federal 
Register, the agency is publishing notice of this MOU.

    Dated: February 2, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[[Page 6298]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.014


[[Page 6299]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.015


[[Page 6300]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.016


[[Page 6301]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.017


[[Page 6302]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.018


[[Page 6303]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.019


[[Page 6304]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.020


[[Page 6305]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.021


[[Page 6306]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.022


[[Page 6307]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10FE04.023

[FR Doc. 04-2738 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

October 19, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Maureen E. Wylie 

 Chief Financial Officer 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM 

SECY-16-0097 – FEE SETTING IMPROVEMENTS AND FISCAL 

YEAR 2017 PROPOSED FEE RULE 

The Commission has disapproved the staff’s recommendation to engage in additional analysis 

of four long-term improvements, with the exception of a voluntary pilot initiative to explore 

whether a flat fee structure could be established for routine licensing matters in the area of 

uranium recovery. 

The staff should begin the activities described in the section of the Fee Transformation List 

starting on page 5, headed “Process Changes Recommended for Future Consideration – FY 

2018 and Beyond,” as soon as possible, rather than delaying their consideration. 

Additionally, the staff should examine opportunities to accelerate the transition to an electronic 

billing system. The staff should look for opportunities to enhance the level of detail contained in 

the invoices. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 OCA 

 OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

PDR
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2307

In Re: HOWELL W. WOLTZ, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:08-cv-00438-WEB)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Howell W. Woltz petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order removing the district court judge from his case due to alleged bias. We conclude that Woltz is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav.

& Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Woltz fails to demonstrate a clear right to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny Woltz’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DISMISSED