alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
18400 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 800 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612-0514

TELEPHONE (949) 760-1121 / FAX (949) 720-0182

Direct Dial Number: (949) 224-6247

Direct Facsimile Number: (949) 224-6407

E-Mail Address: pfraidenburgh@buchalter.com

April 29, 2014

SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY (VIA REGULATIONS.GOV)

Ms. Thuy H. Cooper

Senior Rulemaking Analyst

Airspace and Airmen Rules Division

Office of Rulemaking

Federal Aviation Administration

Re: Amendments to Picture Factory, Inc. Exemption No. 11178 and Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (FAA-2014-0794-333E)

Dear Ms. Cooper:

This is a request for an amendment to Picture Factory, Inc.’s existing Section 333 

Exemption and “blanket” Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (“COA”). On February 18, 

2015, the FAA granted Picture Factory’s request for an exemption to operate small unmanned 

aircraft systems for the purpose of aerial filming and photography. On March 27, 2015, the FAA 

issued a “blanket” COA to Picture Factory, authorizing certain commercial operations below 200 

feet above ground level (“AGL”). Thereafter, on April 9, 2015, the FAA amended its policy to 

allow Section 333 exemption holders to conduct operations using Pilots in Command (“PICs”) 

who hold recreational or sport pilot certificates instead of private pilot’s licenses and additionally 

replacing the requirement that the PIC have a third class medical certificate with the new 

requirement of a valid driver’s license. This letter seeks an amendment to Picture Factory’s 

Exemption and “blanket” COA to allow operations consistent with these policy changes.

Additionally, Picture Factory seeks an amendment to its exemption adding “mapping and 

aerial surveying” as approved operations under the exemption. In its original Petition, Picture 

Factory specifically requested approval of “aerial filming and photography.” Picture Factory

wishes to provide photography services to clients outside of the entertainment industry, but 

within all of the specific parameters and flight limitations applicable to Picture Factory’s motion 

picture and television filming operations (i.e., sterile environment, VLOS, weight/speed 

limitations, etc.). The flight procedures employed to support Picture Factory’s mapping and 

aerial surveying operations would be identical to Picture Factory’s FAA-approved aerial filming 

and photography operations. The only difference is how the images are used after flight. Thus, 

there is good cause to grant this requested amendment.

Los Angeles • Irvine • San Francisco • Scottsdale

BN 18171526v1
April 29, 2014

Page 2

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me 

if you should have any questions.

Best regards,

BUCHALTER NEMER

A Professional Corporation

By

Paul J. Fraidenburgh

Counsel for Picture Factory, Inc.

cc: Rob Pappas

Lakisha Pearson

Jake Troutman

Jillian Nodland

Craig Peterschmidt

BN 18171526v1
§ 1502.9 Processing of requests. ( a ) *Processing.* A person who has made a written request for records which meets the requirements of § 1502.4 shall be informed by the Chief FOIA Officer within 20 working days after receipt of the request of the Foundation's decision whether to deny or grant access to the records and the right of the requestor to seek assistance from the Foundation's Chief Public Liaison.
( b ) *Denials.* If the Chief FOIA Officer, with the concurrence of the General Counsel, denies a request for records, the requestor will be informed of the name and title of the official responsible for the denial, the reasons for it, and the right to appeal the decision to the President of the Foundation within 90 calendar days of receipt of the denial. The President shall determine any appeal within 20 days of receipt and notify the requestor within the time period of the decision. If the decision is to uphold the denial, the requestor will be informed of the reasons for the decision, of the right to a judicial review of the decision in the federal courts, and of the dispute resolution services offered by the FOIA Public Liaison of the Foundation or the Office of Government Information Services of the National Archives and Records Administration as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation.
( c ) *Extension of time.* In unusual circumstances, as defined by the FOIA, to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of requests, the time required to respond to a FOIA request or an appeal may be extended for an additional 10 working days upon written notification to the requestor providing the reasons for the extension. If the extension goes beyond 10 working days, USADF will notify the requestor of services provided by the FOIA Public Liaison and the Office of Government Information Services.
( d ) *Expedited processing.* USADF shall process requests and appeals on an expedited basis where the requestor demonstrates a compelling need for the records, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(v). USADF shall make a determination of whether to provide expedited processing, and shall notify the requestor of the determination, within 10 calendar days after the receipt of the request. USADF shall provide expeditious consideration of administrative appeals of determinations of whether to provide expedited processing.
( e ) *Confidential commercial information.* Whenever records containing confidential commercial information are requested under the FOIA and USADF determines that it may be required to disclose the records, USADF shall promptly provide written notice to the submitter of the confidential commercial information, in conformity with the procedures set forth in Executive Order 12600, Predisclosure Notification Procedures for Confidential Commercial Information, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
EXHIBIT 99.1


THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
NEWS RELEASE                             MEDIA RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
                                         P.O. BOX 1734, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30301
                                         Telephone  (404) 676-2121
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------


                                                        CONTACT:   Sonya Soutus
                                                                 (404) 676-2683




                  E. NEVILLE ISDELL TO BECOME CHAIRMAN AND CEO
                       OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY ON JUNE 1


        ATLANTA, MAY 28, 2004 -- The Coca-Cola Company announced today that E.
Neville Isdell will formally assume the position of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer on Tuesday, June 1, succeeding Douglas N. Daft.  As previously
announced, Mr. Isdell will become the 12th Chairman of the Board in the history
of the Company.

    The Coca-Cola Company is the world's largest beverage company. Along with
Coca-Cola, recognized as the world's best-known brand, The Company markets
four of the world's top five soft drink brands, including diet Coke, Fanta and
Sprite, and a wide range of other beverages, including diet and light soft
drinks, waters, juices and juice drinks, teas, coffees and sports drinks.
Through the world's largest distribution system, consumers in more than 200
countries enjoy the Company's beverages at a rate exceeding 1 billion servings
each day.



                                       ###
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATE

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Life USA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Rick
Newton , CEO and CFO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief.

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                         /s/ Rick Newton


                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Acting
                                         Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  November 23, 2005
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00552-CV

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Las Brisas Energy Center, LLC,

Appellants // Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition,

Cross-Appellants

v.

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.; Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition; Sierra Club; and

Clean Economy Coalition, Appellees // Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and

Las Brisas Energy Center, LLC, Cross-Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-001364, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Cross-appellants Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Texas Clean Air Cities

Coalition have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss

the cross-appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The appeal filed by appellants Texas Commission

on Environmental Quality and Las Brisas EnergyCenter, LLC will continue. We have amended the

style of the case to reflect: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Las Brisas Energy

Center, LLC, Appellants v. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.; Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition;

Sierra Club; and Clean Economy Coalition, Appellees.

It is ordered April 25, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 18, 2006 By  /s/ BRIAN FONTANA    Brian Fontana, Vice President    and Chief Financial Officer   
30
### §13951. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13951 was editorially reclassified as section 12321 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3939 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3939

    To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Disperse Red 367.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Disperse Red 367.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DISPERSE RED 367.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures of         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Disperse Red 367,                                                  31/2014.......
                        (Acetic acid, [4-
                        (2,6-dihydro-2,6-
                        dioxo-
                        7phenylbenzo[1,2-
                        b:4,5-b']difuran-
                        3-yl)phenoxy]-, 2-
                        ethoxyethyl
                        ester), (CAS No.
                        126877-05-2) and
                        (Benzenesulfonyl
                        fluoride, 4-[(1-
                        amino-9,10-
                        dihydro-4-hydroxy-
                        9,10-dioxo-2-
                        anthracenyl)oxy]-
                        ) (CAS No. 170865-
                        52-8) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3204.11.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY GENE PARANTEAU,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

LEROY KIRKEGARD and ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-35609

D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00018-SEHRKS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2013** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Montana state prisoner Kelly Gene Paranteau appeals the district court’s

summary denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

1. The Montana Supreme Court's decision that Paranteau did not suffer a

violation of his speedy trial right was not contrary to or an unreasonable

application of Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Nor

was the Montana Supreme Court’s decision based on an unreasonable

determination of the facts in light of the evidence showing that Paranteau’s counsel

took actions inconsistent with Paranteau’s desire for a speedy trial. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d)(2).

2. The state court's admission of Paranteau’s statements to law enforcement

was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent.

See Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 226 (1973) (considering the totality

of the circumstances to determine the voluntariness of a confession). The state

court found that the offers of leniency were contingent, not guarantees, and that

Paranteau was not so overcome by the effects of methamphetamine that he was

unable to comprehend his circumstances or understand the Miranda warnings. 

Paranteau did not challenge these factual findings in his habeas petition, and they

are presumptively correct. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e).
3

3. The Montana Supreme Court's decision not to remand for retroactive

application of State v. Goetz, 191 P.3d 489 (Mont. 2008), was not contrary to or an

unreasonable application of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). Teague does

not concern retroactivity of newly decided state court cases or newly recognized

state constitutional rights. Moreover, the Montana Supreme Court’s decision rests

on Montana law and therefore does not present a cognizable federal claim. See

Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67 (1991) (noting that “federal habeas corpus

relief does not lie for errors of state law”) (quoting Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764,

780 (1990))).

4. The district court did not abuse its discretion in summarily denying

Paranteau’s habeas petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section

2254 cases. See Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 491 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 57 (Monday, March 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06706]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Arts Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that five 
meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending times are approximate):
    Design (application review): In Room 730. This meeting will be 
closed.
    Dates: April 18, 2013; 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT.
    Design (application review): In Room 730. This meeting will be 
closed.
    Dates: April 19, 2013; 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT.
    Design (application review): In Room 730. This meeting will be 
closed.
    Dates: April 23, 2013; 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT.
    Design (application review): In Room 730. This meeting will be 
closed.
    Dates: April 25, 2013; 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT.
    Design (application review): In Room 730. This meeting will be 
closed.
    Dates: April 26, 2013; 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506; plowitzk@arts.gov or call 202-682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: March 20, 2013.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2013-06706 Filed 3-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED STEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,928                  10,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,000                  37,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,793,356               1,793,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,227,201               2,227,201
<PP&E>                                       2,636,338               2,636,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,226,093               5,226,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,563,952              13,563,952
<BONDS>                                      1,132,893               1,132,893
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,594,171               4,594,171
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,197,035)            (14,197,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (9,602,864)             (9,602,864)
<SALES>                                        144,013                 900,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,013                 900,783
<CGS>                                          194,118                 868,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,118                 868,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               329,042               1,208,739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             262,351                 764,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (641,498)             (1,941,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (641,496)             (1,941,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (641,496)             (1,941,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)                   (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)                   (.85)
        

</TABLE>