alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.12 Eligibility of incidental services. Incidental services may be financed under the same implementing document which makes funds available for the procurement of equipment only if: ( a ) Such services are specified in the purchase contract relating to the equipment;
( b ) The price satisfies the requirements of § 201.68;
( c ) The portion of the total purchase contract price attributable to such services does not exceed 25 percent; and
( d ) The supplier of such services, prior to approval of the USAID Commodity Approval Application, has neither been suspended or debarred by USAID under part 208 of this chapter, nor has been placed on the “Lists of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs,” published by the U.S. General Services Administration.
( e ) The supplier of such services meets the requirements of § 228.25 of this chapter.
[55 FR 34232, Aug. 22, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997]
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 147
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019.

§ 147.4 Notice. ( a ) The Secretary shall ensure that employees, applicants for employment, and the members of the public are provided with adequate notice of the requirements of Section 508, the Revised 508 Standards (36 CFR 1194.1 and appendices A, C and D to 36 CFR part 1194), and this part, as they relate to the programs or activities conducted by the Department.
( b ) The Secretary shall ensure that the home page of the Department's public-facing Web site provides Department policy regarding accessibility of ICT in accordance with Section 508 and 36 CFR part 1194.1, as well as an email address for the public to ask questions or express concerns.
[81 FR 32646, May 24, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019]
```

[115th Congress Public Law 432]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5522]]

Public Law 115-432
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To redesignate Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge as the Nathaniel P. 
        Reed Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2019 -  [S. 3456]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: Florida. 16 USC 668dd note.>>  REDESIGNATION OF 
                              THE HOBE SOUND NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
                              REFUGE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge, located 
in the State of Florida, is redesignated as the ``Nathaniel P. Reed Hobe 
Sound National Wildlife Refuge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
Executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to 
refer to the Nathaniel P. Reed Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge.

    Approved January 10, 2019.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3456:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 21, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4205 

To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act 

of 1998 to increase public awareness about the dangers of synthetic 

drugs through the national youth anti-drug media campaign. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2012 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. REYES, Ms. WATERS, 

Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. WATT, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. RICHARDSON, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 to increase public awareness 

about the dangers of synthetic drugs through the national youth anti-drug media campaign. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Synthetics are Dan5 gerous Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4205 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF DANGERS OF 

2 SYNTHETIC DRUGS THROUGH NATIONAL 

3 YOUTH ANTI-DRUG MEDIA CAMPAIGN. 

4 Section 709 of the Office of National Drug Control 

5 Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998 (21 U.S.C. 1708) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting ‘‘and syn8 thetic drug use’’ after ‘‘illegal drug use’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub10 section: 

11 ‘‘(m) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

12 ‘‘(1) DRUG.—The term ‘drug’ has the meaning 

13 given such term in section 702(3) and includes a 

14 synthetic drug. 

15 ‘‘(2) SYNTHETIC DRUG.—The term ‘synthetic 

16 drug’ means an artificially produced substance that, 

17 as determined by the Director, is an analog or deriv18 ative of a controlled substance (as defined in section 

19 102(6) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

20 802(6)), but is not itself a controlled substance.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3992 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3992

     To allow otherwise eligible Israeli nationals to receive E-2 
 nonimmigrant visas if similarly situated United States nationals are 
          eligible for similar nonimmigrant status in Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2012

    Mr. Berman (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
California, and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To allow otherwise eligible Israeli nationals to receive E-2 
 nonimmigrant visas if similarly situated United States nationals are 
          eligible for similar nonimmigrant status in Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS FROM ISRAEL.

    Israel shall be deemed to be a foreign state described in section 
101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(15)(E)) for purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of such section if 
the Government of Israel provides similar nonimmigrant status to 
nationals of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Wilson                     May 15, 2007
-------------------------------------   Date
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.3a55-3 Futures contracts on security indexes trading on or subject to the rules of a foreign board of trade.

When a contract of sale for future delivery on a security index is traded on or subject to the rules of a foreign board of trade, such index shall not be a narrow-based security index if it would not be a narrow-based security index if a futures contract on such index were traded on a designated contract market or registered derivatives transaction execution facility.

[66 FR 44514, Aug. 23, 2001]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                   |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |     |  |                           
|------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton   
|                   |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton       
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
#### § 123.2 Import jurisdiction.

The Department of State regulates the temporary import of defense articles. Permanent imports of defense articles into the United States are regulated by the Department of the Justice's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives under the direction of the Attorney General (see 27 CFR parts 447, 478, 479, and 555).

[71 FR 20540, Apr. 21, 2006]
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL      OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|      |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                       |                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May                17, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                                                              | /s/ Howard                Becker                        |
|                                   | Howard Becker                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                   | Chief                  Executive Officer and Director(Principal                  Executive Officer  andPrincipal                  Financial                  Officer) |
§ 1423.6 Filing and service of copies. ( a ) An original and four (4) copies of the charge together with one copy for each additional charged party named shall be filed with the Regional Director for the region in which the alleged unfair labor practice has occurred or is occurring. A charge alleging that an unfair labor practice has occurred or is occurring in two or more regions may be filed with the Regional Director for any such region.
( b ) Upon the filing of a charge, the charging party shall be responsible for the service of a copy of the charge (without the supporting evidence and documents) upon the person(s) against whom the charge is made, and for filing a written statement of such service with the Regional Director. The Regional Director will, as a matter of course, cause a copy of such charge to be served on the person(s) against whom the charge is made, but shall not be deemed to assume responsibility for such service.
#### §§ 1701.161-1701.169 [Reserved]
§ 1600.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and adminstrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1600.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
Government & Industry Affairs 1050 K Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 962-8550

April 19, 2012

To: Docket Number EERE-2008-BT-STD-005

From: Ric Erdheim, Senior Counsel, Philips Electronics

Re: Ex Parte Communication

Participants: Peter Shreve and Ric Erdheim, Philips Electronics Vic Petrolatti, DOE Michael Kido, DOE General Counsel Office Matt Nardotti, Navigant Consulting

Discussion: Philips staff asked a series of questions regarding the application of the test procedure and the proposed standard for class I inductive charge battery chargers.

1) Philips asked whether based on statements in the TSD it would be technically feasible for appliances with Ni based batteries to meet the proposed Class 1 (inductive connection) standard. DOE staff said the proposed standard is not a technology based standard so that any technology that met the standard was permissible but DOE staff was unaware of any technologies that would allow the use of nickel based batteries in compliance with the proposed standard. DOE staff said the Philips could comment on the cost of shifting to lithium ion batteries or any loss of utility from such a shift. 2) Philips asked whether the energy used to power LEDs that show battery charge level must be included in the energy consumption measurement. DOE staff said that under the proposal LED energy use must be included, but that Philips could provide comments that LEDs provide a ‘utility’ for the user and therefore the energy used for this purpose should not be considered as part of the energy use calculation. 3) Philips asked for clarification of the term “tcd.” The NOPR defined it as ‘charge test duration’ when it is more precisely ‘charge and maintenance test duration’ as defined in the test procedure and TSD. The term could be interpreted as just the ‘charge’ portion of the ‘charge and maintenance’ test duration. DOE staff confirmed that this term includes both the ‘charge and maintenance’ test duration. E.g. if a handle was fully charged in 19 hours or less, Tcd = 24 hours. 4) Philips asked for clarification of the definition of “Ebatt.” The NOPR references section 5.6 of the test procedure, but section 5.6 (Testing Charge Mode and Battery Maintenance Mode) does not address Ebatt. DOE staff suggested that we provide a comment to request a clarification in the rule on this issue. 5) Philips asked for a clarification of the equation shown in section 2.2 of test procedure. The equation is used to define ‘real’ power in Watts, but the equation shows VA. The equation is missing the power factor term. 6) Philips asked for a clarification of the duration of the charge and maintenance mode test for a battery charging system that uses tr ickle charging exclusively without any ‘full charge’ indication. DOE staff said that 24 hours should be used, regardless of the actual charge time.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the
manager of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. IV (the Partnership),
certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period
ended March 31, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Partnership.  /s/ Patrick L. Beach
Patrick L. Beach
President
GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC
May 14, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 143
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 143 appear at 68 FR 51360, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 143.31 Compliance reviews. ( a ) The agency may conduct compliance reviews and pre-award reviews of recipients that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of these regulations. The agency may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The review may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of this part, the agency will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, the agency will arrange for enforcement as described in § 143.36.