alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 34.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Hybrid instruments.* Hybrid instrument means an equity or debt security or depository instrument as defined in § 34.3(a)(1) with one or more commodity-dependent components that have payment features similar to commodity futures or commodity option contracts or combinations thereof.
( b ) *Commodity-independent component.* Commodity-independent component means the component of a hybrid instrument, the payments of which do not result from indexing to, or calculation by reference to, the price of a commodity.
( c ) *Commodity-independent value.* Commodity-independent value means the present value of the payments attributable to the commodity-independent component calculated as of the time of issuance of the hybrid instrument.
( d ) *Commodity-dependent component.* A commodity-dependent component means a component of a hybrid instrument, the payment of which results from indexing to, or calculation by reference to, the price of a commodity.
( e ) *Commodity-dependent value.* For purposes of application of Rule 34.3(a)(2), a commodity-dependent value means the value of a commodity dependent-component, which when decomposed into an option payout or payouts, is measured by the absolute net value of the put option premia with strike prices less than or equal to the reference price plus the absolute net value of the call option premia with strike prices greater than or equal to the reference price, calculated as of the time of issuance of the hybrid instrument.
( f ) *Option premium.* Option premium means the value of an option on the referenced commodity of the hybrid instrument, and calculated using the same method as that used to determine the issue price of the instrument, or where such premia are not explicitly calculated in determining the issue price of the instrument, the value of such options calculated using a commercially reasonable method appropriate to the instrument being priced.
( g ) *Reference price.* A reference price means a price nearest the current spot or forward price, whichever is used to price instrument, at which a commodity-dependent payment becomes non-zero, or, in the case where two potential reference prices exist, the price that results in the greatest commodity-dependent value.
#### § 1508.135 May the African Development Foundation exclude a person who is not currently participating in a nonprocurement transaction?

Given a cause that justifies an exclusion under this part, we may exclude any person who has been involved, is currently involved, or may reasonably be expected to be involved in a covered transaction.
#### § 1306.23 Bankruptcy.

A debtor should notify MCC at the contact office provided in the original notice of the debt, if the debtor has filed for bankruptcy. MCC will require documentation from the applicable court indicating the date of filing and type of bankruptcy. Pursuant to the laws of bankruptcy, MCC will suspend debt collection upon such filing unless the automatic stay is no longer in effect or has been lifted. In general, collection of a debt discharged in bankruptcy shall be terminated unless otherwise provided for by bankruptcy law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,699
<INVENTORY>                                    200,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               607,754
<PP&E>                                       2,825,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                 733,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,864,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          643,963
<BONDS>                                        804,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,450
<COMMON>                                        44,872
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,050,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,864,560
<SALES>                                      1,537,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,537,098
<CGS>                                        1,493,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,493,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1006.360 What happens if I fail to disclose the information required under § 1006.355?

If we later determine that you failed to tell the person at the higher tier that you were excluded or disqualified at the time you entered into the covered transaction with that person, we may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.650 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41224

(Summary Calendar)

BUREL B. SMITH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

LAMAR UNIVERSITY; JOSEPH 

OLSON, in his individual 

and official capacities; 

RAJIV MALKIAN, in his 

individual and official 

capacities; STEVE MARADIAN, 

in his individual and official

capacities, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:95-CV-1031)

July 23, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Burel B. Smith appeals the district
2

court’s dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

and by summary judgment, of his actions against Lamar University

and three of its faculty and staff members —— namely, Joseph Olson,

Rajiv Malkian, and Steve Maradian —— in their individual and

official capacities (collectively, Appellees). The claims

dismissed by the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) were

those for constructive termination, Fourteenth Amendment

violations, and intentional infliction of emotional distress as to

all Appellees, and for violations of Title VII and the ADEA as to

the individual Appellees. At the same time, the district court

granted Lamar University’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing

Smith’s claims against Lamar under Title VII for racial

discrimination and retaliation, as well as his ADEA claim. 

After carefully reviewing de novo the record on appeal and the

briefs of counsel for their respective clients, and carefully

considering the Final Judgment of the district court filed October

31, 1996, dismissing all of Smith’s actions against all Appellees,

we reach the same conclusion as did the district court. No useful

purpose would be served by our writing separately, as the analysis

contained in the district court’s craftsmanlike opinion adequately

and correctly disposes of this case. Thus the rulings, orders, and

judgment of the district court are, in all respects, 

AFFIRMED.
Order filed May 7, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________

No. 11-14-00198-CR

___________

RONALD EDGAR LEE, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19309B

O R D E R

This appeal has become unduly stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s 

appointed counsel, Paul W. Hanneman, to file an appellate brief. The brief was 

originally due on December 1, 2014. This court has previously granted two 

extensions of time to file Appellant’s brief, and Hanneman has now filed a third 

motion for extension. Today, we grant that motion in part and extend the deadline 

in which to file Appellant’s brief to June 15, 2015.
2

By this order, Paul W. Hanneman is ORDERED to file in this court a brief

on behalf of Appellant on or before Monday, June 15, 2015. At that time, 

Appellant’s brief shall have already been e-filed or be present in the portal for the 

Eleventh Court of Appeals through eFileTexas.gov. 

PER CURIAM

May 7, 2015

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Soenksen, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GXS Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2004
    
    /s/ John SoenksenName: John SoenksenTitle: Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a )( 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, F ield s’s r e que s tf oror a l a r gum e nti s de ni e d.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ZELO S FI ELD S, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J . L . NO R WOOD , R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 56345 D. C . No . 5 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 1 7 3 - VA P ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia V i r gi ni aA . P hi l l i ps , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F ed er al p riso n erZ elo s F ield s ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2241 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED DE C 31 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 56345 2 F i e l ds c ha l l e nge s apr i s on di s c i pl i na ryvi ol a t i on tha tr e s ul t e d i n the l os s of g o o dco n du ctt i m e, co n t en d i n g th ath i s ri g h tt o du e p ro cess w as v i o l at edb ecau se h e w a s d e n ie ds ta f

f r e p r e s e n ta tio n a t h is h e a r in g , a n db e c au s e h e d idn o t k n o w in g ly or vo l un t ar i l y w ai ve hi s r i gh tt o st af f r epre se nt at i on . W e r evi ew the deni alof a s e c tio n 2 2 4 1 h ab e a s p e titio n d e n o v o . Se e T ablada v . T

hom as , 533 F . 3d 800, 805 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). T he re cord ref

l ec t s thatF i el ds w as af

forded the m i ni m alprocedural p r o te c tio n s to w h ic h h e w a s e n title d . Se e W o lff v . McD o n n e ll , 418 U . S . 539, 563- 6 7 ( 1 9 7 4 ) . C o n tr a ryto F ie ld s ’s c o n te n tio n , h is c a s e w a s n o t s o c o m p lic a te da s to e n title h im to s ta f

f r e p r e s e n ta tio n a t h is h e a r in g . Se e i d. at5 7 0 (an i n m at e h as a r i ghtt o a s s i s t a nc e f

r om af e l l ow i nm a t e ors t a f

f w he r e “ the c om pl e xi tyof the i s s ue m akes i tun l i kel y thatthe i nm at e w i l l be abl e t o col l ec tand p re se ntthe evi dence ne c e s s a ryf

ora n a de qua t e c om pr e he ns i on of the c a s e ” ) . T he r e f

or e , w e do not r e a c h F i e l ds ’ s c l a i m tha thi s w a i ve rof s t a f f r e pr e s e nt a t i on w a s unknow i ng a nd i n v o l u n t ary. T o the ext entthatF i el ds ar gu es thathe w as deni ed hi s r i gh tun der W o lff to ca l l w i tness es , thi s c on t ent i on i s notsupp ort ed by the re cord, w hi ch re fl ec t s that F i el d s n ev er m ad e a req u estt o cal l w i tn esses, o r i d en t i fi edan y p o t en t i al w i tn esses. AF F I RME D.
----

----

| INDIANA                                  |   | 1-7160                   |   | 35-1101097          |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction             |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. Employer    |
| of incorporation or organization)        |   |                     |   | Identification No.) |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
| 2831 Dexter Drive, Elkhart, Indiana      |   |                     |   | 46514               |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   |                     |   | (Zip Code)          |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
|                                     |   | (574) 266-2500           |   |                |
| (Registrant’s telephone number,    |
| including area code)                     |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
|                                     |   | N / A                    |   |                |
| (Former Name or Former Address,          |
| if Changed Since Last Report)            |

| □ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)                  |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| □ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)                 |
| □ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| □ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

| Date:  | December 1, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ James T. Holden        |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |             |   |   |                       |
|   |             |   |   | James T. Holden, Secretary |
|   |             |   |   | Printed Name and Title     |

----

----
§ 135.4 Consultation with other agencies. ( a ) The Department of State will, to the extent possible, consult with the appropriate officials in other federal agencies to identify their current and former covered employees, and current and former dependents who reported an anomalous health incident while working under Chief of Mission authority. This consultation is solely to assist the other agencies in determining who might be initially eligible for payment under the HAVANA Act. The Department of State will not process payment for employees, former employees, or dependents of current or former employees of other agencies.
( b ) Under the HAVANA Act, the heads of other employing federal agencies are responsible for prescribing regulations to carry out the HAVANA Act, including regulations for approving any payment.
#### § 1423.18 Burden of proof before the Administrative Law Judge.

The General Counsel shall have the responsibility of presenting the evidence in support of the complaint and shall have the burden of proving the allegations of the complaint by a preponderance of the evidence.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy Shea, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
132 STAT. 5564 PUBLIC LAW 115–438—JAN. 14, 2019 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 7319: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Dec. 21, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–438 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to provide flexibility 

with respect to the leaseback of certain Federal real property, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LEASEBACK RESTRICTION. 

Section 12(b)(4) of the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act 

of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114–287) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘for a period of greater than 3 years’’ 

before the period at the end; 

(2) by striking ‘‘None of the’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—None of the’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—A leaseback under this paragraph— 

‘‘(i) shall expire on or before the last day of the 

3-year period beginning on the date of the sale of 

the respective property; 

‘‘(ii) may not contain any options to extend or 

renew the leaseback; 

‘‘(iii) may only be entered into once for purposes 

of temporarily housing the Federal agency in the property at the time of the sale; and 

‘‘(iv) shall only be for the purpose of facilitating 

the sale of the respective property.’’. 

Approved January 14, 2019. 

Expiration date. 

Time period. 

Jan. 14, 2019 

[H.R. 7319] 


smartinez on DSK30VT082PROD with PUBLAWS
#### § 1506.34 Can I pay a compromised claim in installments?

The debtor may not pay a compromised claim in installments unless the CFO determines that payment in installments is necessary to effect collection.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24
- 40095 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Michael Dale Campbell, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22
- CR
- 120 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Haynes, Higginson,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Dale Campbell, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Campbell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 10, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-40095 Document: 38-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2024No. 24
- 40095

2 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 24-40095 Document: 38-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2024