alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# COMSECY-16-0011: Procedures for Mandatory Hearings on Construction Permit Applications for Medical Isotope Production and Utilization Facilities

Accession Number: ML16182A333

Date Released: Friday, August 26, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16182A334 - COMSECY-16-0011:  Procedures for Mandatory Hearings on Construction Permit Applications for Medical Isotope Production and Utilization Facilities (2 page(s), 6/30/2016)
    - ML16182A336 - COMSECY-16-0011:  Enclosure - Procedures for Mandatory Hearings on Construction Permit Applications for Medical Isotope Production and Utilization Facilities (20 page(s), 6/30/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.4c-4 Applications under section 304(c)(1). ( a ) An applicant under section 304(c)(1) may, if it so desires, waive a hearing and request the Commission to decide the application without a formal hearing on the basis of the application and such other information and documents as the Commission shall designate as a part of the record. However, a hearing may be called upon order of the Commission notwithstanding that the applicant shall have filed such a waiver and request whenever, in the judgment of the Commission, such a hearing is necessary or appropriate in the public interest.
( b ) If the applicant waives a hearing and requests the Commission to decide the application without a hearing and if no hearing has been ordered by the Commission: ( 1 ) The applicant shall, at the request of the Commission, furnish such additional information or documents as the Commission may deem necessary to decide the application.
( 2 ) The Commission may, with the consent of the applicant, make a part of the record any pertinent information or documents filed with the Commission by the applicant or by any other person.
( 3 ) The Commission shall, in its order deciding the application, designate and describe the information and documents comprising the record on which the decision is based.
[6 FR 981, Feb. 15, 1941]
#### § 1500.8 Changing the time and place of, and reconsideration of opening or closing a meeting.

The time or place of a Board meeting may be changed following the public announcement only if the Foundation publicly announces such change at the earliest practicable time. The subject matter of a meeting, or the determination of the Foundation to open or close a meeting, or portion of a meeting, to the public, may be changed following the public announcement only if a majority of the Board of Directors determines by a recorded vote that Foundation business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible, and the Foundation publicly announces such change and the vote of each member upon change at the earliest practicable time.
Subpart 3419.2—Policies

Parent topic: PART 3419—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

3419.201 General policy.

3419.201-70 Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business

Utilization (OSDBU).

The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) is responsible for facilitating

the implementation of the Small Business Act, as described in FAR 19.201. The OSDBU develops

rules, policy, procedures, and guidelines for the effective administration of ED's small business

program.
#### § 301.300c Form 300-C, for report of all fails to receive.

This form shall be filed as required by § 300.303 of this chapter with the trustee in a proceeding under section 5 of the Act by a broker-dealer who executed transactions out of which arose open contractual commitments, as defined by § 300.300(c) of this chapter, with the debtor in the proceeding. The form shall be used to report all the fails to receive, as defied by § 300.300(a) of this chapter, that were open on the filing date, as well as any subsequent closeouts. This form shall accompany the form described in § 300.300a.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 300-C, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### In the Matter of the Court Funds Deposited Prior to 1891.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present ■—• Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 31, 2008/s/ Richard Randall

Richard RandallPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 20
#### §§ 1510.171-1510.999 [Reserved]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                                  June 9, 2004



                              THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



               Delaware             001-02217             58-0628465
           (State or other         (Commission           (IRS Employer
             jurisdiction          File Number)        Identification No.)
          of incorporation)



              One Coca-Cola Plaza
                Atlanta, Georgia                            30313
    (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404)676-2121



<PAGE>



Item 5.  Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure

Attached as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference is a copy of a
press release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 9, 2004, regarding Steven J.
Heyer.

Item 7(c).        Exhibits

Exhibit 99.1      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 9, 2004,
                  regarding Steven J. Heyer.


<PAGE>




                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                           THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                                           (REGISTRANT)


Date:  June 9, 2004                        By:/s/ Clyde C. Tuggle
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Clyde C. Tuggle
                                              Senior Vice President,
                                              Worldwide Public Affairs and
                                              Communications





<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.
------------

Exhibit 99.1       Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 9, 2004,
                   regarding Steven J. Heyer.
28 So.2d 337

#### STATE v. OWENS.

No. 38240.

Nov. 12, 1946.

*810J. S. Pickett, of Many, for defendant-••appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Edwin M. Fraser, Dist. Atty., of Many, for plaintiffappellee.

FOURNET, Justice.

The defendant, Rufus Owens, reserved •several bills of exceptions during the •course of his trial, but having failed to present them to the trial judge for his signature and action prior to his appeal, there are no valid.bills before this court and, consequently, nothing for us to review since there are no errors patent or the face of the record. See Articles 499, .542, and 545 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; State v. Snowden, 174 La. 156, 140 So. 9; State v. Early, 183 La. 664, 164 So. 620.

The contention that “since there is no State Statute prohibiting the keeping of intoxicating liquors for sale and the indictment does not allege the violation of an ordinance * * * the indictment is fatally defective,” and there is, therefore, an error patent on the face of the record, is without merit. A mere reading of the indictment will show that the defendant was not charged or prosecuted under an ordinance of the police jury, but, instead, under Act No. 15 of 1934, Section 13 of which provides that “Whoever shall sell or keep for sale any intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes, in any parish, locality, ward, city, town or village of this State, where the sale of intoxicating liquors is prohibited by law or ordinance shall, on conviction, be punished by fine * * * or imprisonment * * *.” See State v. Schimpf, 203 La. 839, 14 So.2d 677; State v. Monsour, 205 La. 272, 17 So.2d 307.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 143

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 143 appear at 68 FR 51360, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 143.37 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

Certain procedural provisions applicable to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to enforcement of this part. They are 22 CFR 141.8 through 141.10.
§ 1508.365 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 1508.355 after entering into a covered transaction with a higher tier participant? At any time after you enter into a lower tier covered transaction with a person at a higher tier, you must provide immediate written notice to that person if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 1508.355; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 1508.355.
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 89 FR 71806, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 3.61 Extensions of time for proceedings brought under § 3.55, § 3.56, and § 3.60 of this part. ( a ) *In general.* Except as otherwise provided by law or by these rules, for good cause shown, the Commission or an Administrative Law Judge before whom a proceeding brought under § 3.55, § 3.56 or § 3.60 is then pending, on their own motion or the motion of a party, may at any time extend or shorten the time limit prescribed by those rules for filing any document. In any instance in which a time limit is not prescribed for an action to be taken concerning any matter, the Commission or the Administrative Law Judge may set a time limit for that action.
( b ) *Motions for extension of time.* Absent extraordinary circumstances, in any instance in which a time limit that has been prescribed for an action to be taken concerning any matter exceeds seven days from the date of the order establishing the time limit, requests for extension of time shall be filed at least five (5) days prior to the expiration of the time limit and shall explain why an extension of time is necessary.
[57 FR 23154, June 2, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 19597, Apr. 15, 1993]
| **Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                                         |           |           |   |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                                             | $ 0.44         | $ 0.42         | $ 3.32 | $ 2.46 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147480008/505-10-S99-1
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 5, 2008 By:  /s/ BRIAN FONTANA    Brian Fontana, Vice President    and Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 44270/44271

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MELISSA JO ROGERS BURKY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 319

Filed: January 17, 2017

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz, District Judge. 

Judgments of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of seven years, with 

three years determinate, for possession of methamphetamine; ten years, with three 

years determinate, for aggravated driving under the influence; and five years, with 

three years determinate, for leaving the scene of an accident resulting in injury or 

death, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; MELANSON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, Melissa Jo Rogers Burky pled guilty to possession of 

methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(1); one count of leaving the scene of an accident 

resulting in injury or death, I.C. § 18-8007; and one count of aggravated driving while under the 

influence of alcohol, drugs, or any other intoxicating substance, I.C. § 18-8006(1). The district 

court imposed concurrent unified sentences of seven years, with three years determinate, for 

possession of methamphetamine; ten years, with three years determinate, for aggravated DUI; 
2

and five years, with three years determinate, for leaving the scene of an accident. Burky filed 

Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions for reduction of her sentences, which the district court granted, 

retaining jurisdiction. Burky appeals, contending that her sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Burky’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.