alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300ff. Purpose

It is the purpose of this Act to provide emergency assistance to localities that are disproportionately affected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus epidemic and to make financial assistance available to States and other public or private nonprofit entities to provide for the development, organization, coordination and operation of more effective and cost efficient systems for the delivery of essential services to individuals and families with HIV disease.

(Pub. L. 101–381, §2, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–381, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 576, known as the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, which enacted this subchapter, transferred section 300ee–6 of this title to section 300ff–48 of this title, amended sections 284a, 286, 287a, 287c–2, 289f, 290aa–3a, 299c–5, 300ff–48, and 300aaa to 300aaa–13 [now 238 to 238m] of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 201, 300x–4, 300ff–11, 300ff–46, and 300ff–80 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1990 Amendment note set out under section 201 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
#### Beatrice Selzer, Respondent, v. Herbert Taylor, Appellant.

Order reversed and motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Present —■ Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor M. Medina, Jr., Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 888]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 21, 1998 *(People v Medina,*253 AD2d 830), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered March 12, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). S. Miller, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
§ 1306.16 Procedures for salary offset. Unless otherwise provided by statute, regulation, or contract, the following procedures apply to salary offset: ( a ) *Method.* Salary offset will be made by deduction at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of the employee without his or her consent.
( b ) *Source.* The source of salary offset is current disposable pay.
( c ) *Types of collection.* ( 1 ) *Lump sum payment.* Ordinarily debts will be collected by salary offset in one lump sum if possible. However, if the amount of the debt exceeds 15 percent of disposable pay for an officially established pay interval, the collection by salary offset must be made in installment deductions, except as provided by other laws or regulations or unless the employee has agreed in writing to a greater amount.
( 2 ) *Installment deductions.* ( i ) The size of installment deductions must bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. If possible, the size of the deduction will be that necessary to liquidate the debt in no more than 1 year. However, the amount deducted for any period must not exceed 15 percent of the disposable pay from which the deduction is made, except as provided by other laws or regulations or unless the employee has agreed in writing to a greater amount.
( ii ) Installment payments of less than $50 per pay period will be accepted only in unusual circumstances such as when that amount exceeds 15% of disposable pay.
( iii ) Installment deductions should be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the Government's claim within three years and must be made over a period not greater than the anticipated period of employment.
This document may be requested under the Freedom of Information 

Act (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/foia/), but access is restricted to 

entities not engaged in the production, sale, or distribution of 

pesticides outside the United States.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer





I, Joseph V. Vittoria, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.

        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November 14, 2008/s/ Joseph V. VittoriaName:Title:

        Joseph V. VittoriaChairman and Chief Executive Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DEBBIE MARIE SINGLETON, a/k/a Debbie Marie Wofford, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief 

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00030-jpj-mfu-3; 1:08-cv-80071-jpjmfu)) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Debbie Marie Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. 

Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Debbie Marie Singleton seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Singleton 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2
                       New York Regional Rail Corporation
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Regional Rail Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Russell J. Arnst, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Russell J. Arnst
Russell J. Arnst, Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer

May 11, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New York Regional Rail Corporation and will retained by New York
Regional Rail Corporation and furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,079,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,813,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,780,984
<INVENTORY>                                  1,377,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,931,459
<PP&E>                                      18,090,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,564,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             144,854,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       71,628,859
<BONDS>                                        832,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,574
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,755,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               144,854,797
<SALES>                                     19,154,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           129,965,006
<CGS>                                       18,257,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              110,236,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,528,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (9,544,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (9,544,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (8,331,627)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              5,796,771
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,079,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.80)


</TABLE>
#### § 19.13-3 Payment after death of principal.

If a participant or former participant dies and no claim for annuity is payable, the lump-sum credit is paid to surviving beneficiaries.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                      |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |     |  |                           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton   
|                      |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton       
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Transparencyreport: the USA FREEDOM Act business records FISA implementation
 
report|appendixb|
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.2:B 96/3
Item Number:0306 (online)
System Number:001105194
August 28, 2019
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear at 85 FR 32296, July 13, 2020.

#### § 161.3 Applicability.

The provisions of these regulations apply to decisions on all Departmental actions which may affect the quality of the environment within the United States. The Department is establishing separate environmental review procedures under Executive Order 12114 (January 4, 1979) for actions having potential effects on the environment of global commons or areas outside the jurisdiction of any nation, or on the environment of foreign nations.
### §1973aa–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973aa–3 was editorially reclassified as section 10505 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
at
\ )

| 54, LF

| Erevan | fe
= LA]
F
= J <i
i ee
4

= . . 2 - | | /

R70 Ww eo 68 sz 66. 65. 64 63 62 ‘61 lo

| | ovata cap ps ain as ——_— —— Map 2-24
0 25 5 > aaaee 20 25 Potential Disposals -
Alternative 1

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Cook,

Appeal from a judgment of the Albany County Court, rendered May 12, 1976, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of rape in the first degree and rape in the third degree. Defendant first contends that the trial court erred with respect to its charge on reasonable doubt when it stated that the People are not required to prove the defendant’s guilt to a mathematical certainty or beyond all possible or conceivable doubt. Our examination of the charge reveals that the trial court committed no error in connection with the charge on the question of reasonable doubt. Nor do we find that the sentence imposed by the trial court of an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a minimum term of 1214 years and a maximum of 25 years, as a second felony offender, was excessive in view of the heinous nature of the crime. We have examined the remainder of defendant’s contentions and find them be without merit. Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany (successor by conversion to Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2019 (as amended, the“Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Company LLC II (successor by conversion to Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II), as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of the undersigned’sknowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2022. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
20 

**
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

MARS Construction Company aka MARS 

Construction and Engineering Service Co. 

Under Contract No. W91B4N-16-C-8015 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

) 

) 

) ASBCA Nos. 61289, 61372 

) 

) 

) 

Walt Pennington, Esq. 

Pennington Law Firm 

San Diego, CA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Bruce H. Robinson, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: February 12,2019 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61289, 61372, Appeals of MARS 

Construction Company aka MARS Construction and Engineering Service Co., rendered 

in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
### §290bb–35. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §520D, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXI, §3107, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1179, related to services for youth offenders.
### §268. Quarantine duties of consular and other officers

(a) Any consular or medical officer of the United States, designated for such purpose by the Secretary, shall make reports to the Surgeon General, on such forms and at such intervals as the Surgeon General may prescribe, of the health conditions at the port or place at which such officer is stationed.

(b) It shall be the duty of the customs officers and of Coast Guard officers to aid in the enforcement of quarantine rules and regulations; but no additional compensation, except actual and necessary traveling expenses, shall be allowed any such officer by reason of such services.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §365, 58 Stat. 705; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Surgeon General abolished by section 3 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, and functions thereof transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 1 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, set out as a note under section 202 of this title. Office of Surgeon General reestablished within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, see Notice of Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Mar. 30, 1987, 52 F.R. 11754.

Reference to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare substituted for reference to Federal Security Administrator pursuant to section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1, of 1953, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title, which transferred functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.