alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice if hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, December 3, 2004, 10:30 a.m. to December 3, 2004, 11:30 a.m. National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     November 29, 2004, 69 FR 69379.                 

The meeting will be held December 9, 2004. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: December 1, 2004. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26884  Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 2.2 Authority to affix seal. ( a ) The following officials of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are authorized to affix the Seal to appropriate documents and other materials of the Commission for all purposes including those authorized by 28 U.S.C. 1733(b) (relating to authenticated copies of agency documents used as evidence): The Chairman and all Commissioners, the General Counsel, the Executive Director, the Directors of Divisions, and the Secretariat.
( b ) The officials named in paragraph (a) of this section, may redelegate, and authorize redelegation of this authority, except that the Secretary may redelegate this authority only to the Deputy Secretary.
[41 FR 9552, Mar. 5, 1976, as amended at 51 FR 37177, Oct. 20, 1986]
#### § 1421.10 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of State, except that (subject to 22 U.S.C. 3921) with reference to the exercise of functions under the Foreign Service Act of 1980 with respect to any agency authorized by law to utilize the Foreign Service personnel system, such term means the head of that agency.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Yusuf Abdul Alim, Also Known as Albert McQueen, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of the Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: This is an appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Supreme Court which dismissed relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, without a hearing. As a result of his convictions by jury verdict in Queens County in February of 1973 for the crimes of assault, possession of weapons, resisting arrest, theft of services and obstruction of government administration, relator is presently serving concurrent indeterminate sentences at the Attica Correctional Facility. Relator does not attack the legality of his detention based upon these convictions, but rather seeks a writ of habeas corpus as a vehicle to attack the validity of a subsequent indictment returned against him by a Clinton County Grand Jury relating to his alleged assault upon a correction officer during an earlier stay at the Clinton Correctional Facility before being transferred to Attica. Inasmuch as the relief requested would not result in relator’s discharge from prison (see *People ex rel. Lane v Vincent,*32 NY2d 940; *People ex rel. Fitzgerald v Casscles,*28 NY2d 866, 868) and the grounds for relief here asserted have all been previously considered and rejected either in pretrial motions or in a *729similar application for a writ which was earlier denied (see *People ex rel. Vess v La Vallee,*55 AD2d 968), dismissal of the present application was proper. (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C18” (“C18 Committee”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C18”, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of C18 Committee's standards development activities are: related to dry cells and batteries. Currently, C18 Committee maintains 11 standards relating to general specifications and safety for portable lithium and portable non-lithium batteries as well as portable rechargeable batteries. The standards developed by C18 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27543 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
________________________

Stipulation re 2/11/10 Hearing Date 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

PAUL F. DeMEESTER (SBN 148578) 

Attorney at Law 

1766A – 18th Street 

San Francisco, California 94107 

(415) 861-5304; (415) 520-0137 [FAX] 

Attorney for Defendant CASSANDRA B. NICKERSON 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO VENUE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 08-0192 JL 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CASSANDRA B. NICKERSON, 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________/ 

STIPULATION

 Both parties hereby stipulate that the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss 

currently scheduled for February 11, 2010, at 11 a.m. be continued to March 4, 2010, at 

11 a.m. due to defense counsel’s current unavailability due to suffering from the flu. 

DATED: February 9, 2010. 

_______/s/_____________ ___________/s/______________________

PAUL F. DeMEESTER ACADIA L. SENESE 

Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney 

SO ORDERED, 

_____________________

HON. JAMES LARSON 

Case 3:08-cr-00192-RS Document 41 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 1 Case3:08-cr-00192-JL Document40 Filed02/09/10 Page1 of 1
#### § 120.63 Foreign person.

*Foreign person* means any natural person who is not a lawful permanent resident as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or who is not a protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3). It also means any foreign corporation, business association, partnership, trust, society, or any other entity or group that is not incorporated or organized to do business in the United States, as well as international organizations, foreign governments, and any agency or subdivision of foreign governments (e.g., diplomatic missions).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, FrankM. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Frank M. Semple          |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
|                     |
| August 7, 2006           |

 

----
#### §§ 144.161-144.169 [Reserved]
#### Paul Atlas, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the Union Free School District No. 4, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 20, 1960, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss his complaint for insufficiency, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Plaintiff, an employee of Cueeinell Electric Co., Inc., which was employed to do electrical work in a school building under the control of defendant, sustained injuries when the scaffold upon which he was working tipped over. Defendant had furnished the scaffold. The complaint alleged that the scaffold was defectively constructed and that defendant failed to obtain the approval of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the Department of Labor, in violation of section 200, subdivisions 1-3 of section 240 and subdivision 7 of section 241 of the Labor Law. The Special Term granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on *951the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The basis of the dismissal is that the complaint failed to plead compliance with the statutory provision requiring the presentation or service of a written verified claim within three months after the cause of action accrued (Education Law, § 3813, subd. 1). Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, SEER Expansion Renewals.
    Date: January 4, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone conference call.)
    Contact Person: C. Michael Kerwin, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8057, MSC 8329, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8329. (301) 496-7421. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ae1eff8fde3e4e7cae7ebe3e6a4e4e3e2a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98f3fdeaeff1f6f5d8f5f9f1f4b6f6f1f0b6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27494 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §13437. Advanced diesel emissions program

#### (a) Program direction

The Secretary shall initiate a 5-year program, in accordance with sections 13541 and 13542 of this title, on diesel engine combustion and engine systems, related advanced materials, and fuels and lubricants to reduce emissions oxides of nitrogen and particulates. Activities conducted under this program shall supplement activities of a similar nature at the Department of Energy. Such program shall include field demonstrations of sufficient scale and number in operating environments to prove technical and economic viability to meet the goal stated in subsection (b).

#### (b) Program goal

The goal of the program established under subsection (a) shall be to accelerate the ability of United States diesel manufacturers to meet current and future oxides of nitrogen and particulate emissions requirements.

#### (c) Program plan

Within 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary, in consultation with appropriate representatives of industry, institutions of higher education, Federal agencies, including national laboratories, and professional and technical societies, shall prepare and submit to the Congress a 5-year program plan to guide the activities under this section. Such plan shall be included as part of the plan required by section 13431(b) of this title.

#### (d) Solicitation of proposals

Within 1 year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals for conducting activities consistent with the 5-year program plan.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XX, §2027, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3066.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Amedio Cianci, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Lindsay, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 7, 1975 (the date on the clerk’s extract is July 15, 1975), convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second, degree (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. The prosecutor elicited, and emphasized on summation, the fact that the sole defense witness had not reported to the police the fact that appellant allegedly had not been at the scene of the crime on the night in question. Such conduct has been held to be error and has been strongly condemned (see *People v Mims,*59 AD2d 769; *People v Hamlin,*58 AD2d 631). That fact was utilized by the prosecutor as a springboard for his improper accusation that the defense witness was a liar (see *People v Burnside,*52 AD2d 626). At the close of his summation, he stated: "I will leave you with one parting shot: Why would an innocent man put a liar on the stand on his own behalf?” The sufficiency of proof on the issue of the identification of the appellant as the perpetrator of the crime was a close question, as it was in *People v Mims (supra).*Since the evidence of guilt was not overwhelming, these errors require reversal. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Notice of Related Case has been filed stating that the following cases arerelated within the meaning of Crim. L.R. 8-1(b):

CR 7-0665 MMC United States v. BoykinCR 8-0152 MHP United States v. Boykin

ORDER

The time for filing a statement to support or oppose the Notice has passed.  Onthe basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliestfiled case, I find that the cases:

[     ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b).

[     ] ARE RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b).  I find, however,that reassignment to me of the action(s) currently assigned to another judge is notwarranted.

[ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Crim. L.R. 8-1(b).  Pursuant to Crim.L.R. 8-1(e), the Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the later-filed action to theundersigned.  Counsel are instructed that all future filings are to bear the initials MMCimmediately after the case number.  All matters presently scheduled for hearing in thereassigned case(s) before a district court judge are vacated and must be renoticed forhearing before the undersigned.

DATED:  May 25, 2010                                                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00152-MMC   Document 8   Filed 05/25/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-10T19:39:44-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 191.20 Eligibility for benefits.

A person designated as a hostage or Family Member of a hostage under subpart A of this subchapter shall be eligible for benefits under this subpart.
#### § 305.31 Stayed or invalid parts.

If any section or portion of a section of this part is stayed or held invalid, the remainder of the part will not be affected.

[52 FR 46894, Dec. 10, 1987. Redesignated at 59 FR 34036, July 1, 1994, and further redesignated at 72 FR 49974, Aug. 29, 2007, and further redesignated at 84 FR 58029, Oct. 30, 2019]
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DALE B. ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 22

- 0692 (UNA) ) CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS
, et al.
, ) ) Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A pro se litigant’s pleadings are held to less stringent standards than would be applied to
formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

. Jarrell v. Tisch
, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the C ourt ’s
jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled
to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The
purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim
being asser ted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498

(D.D.C. 1977).
Plaintiff, an Arkansas resident, alleges assorted violations of constitutionally

- protected
rights. According to plaintiff, unknown agents of the federal government have surveilled his2

activities and obtained and disseminated his personal identifying and medical information ; his
neighbors (whom plaintiff believes to be government agents) harass him and his wife by blowing

whistles at them day and night , hacking their computers, tampering with their mai l , and using
bioweapons to infect them ; and local and state officials have not responded appropriately to their
written complaints. Among other relief, plaintiff demands a declaratory judgment, unspecified
monetary damages, and injunctive relief.

Notwiths tanding the length of the complaint and the number of offenses it alleges, the
Court cannot identify a short and plain statement showing plaintiff’s entitlement to the relief he
demands. As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) , and no def endant can be
expected to prepare a proper response to it. For these reasons, the Court will dismiss the
complaint without prejudice and grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis . A n
Order is issued separately.

DATE: April 4, 2022 /s/ AMIT P. MEHTA United States District Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear at 85 FR 32296, July 13, 2020.

#### § 161.10 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 5, 2005                                                     |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Pierre Bourgeois v. Frank A. Celentano et al., as Executors of Paul V. McNutt, Deceased.

Motion for leave to reargue appeal or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.