alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
smsahum1012gex41082510.htm




 



EXHIBIT 4.1


 


 


CUSIP


 



	 	SMSA HUMBLE ACQUISITION CORP. 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 	 	 
	  	  	
SEE REVERSE FOR

	  
	  	
COMMON STOCK 

	
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
SPECIMEN

	  	  










 


 


This


certifies


that


 


 


 


 


is the owner of


 


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF


SMSA HUMBLE ACQUISITION CORP.


 


(hereinafter called the "Corporation"), transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended (copies of which are on file at the office of the Transfer Agent), to all of which the holder of this Certificate by acceptance hereof assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. Witness the facsmile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 



	
DATE:

	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	
  [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]

	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  	
 Countersigned:

	  	  
	
PRESIDENT

	  	  	
SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION

	  	  
	  	  	  	
P.O. Box 701629

	  	  
	  	  	  	
Dallas, TX 75370

	  	  
	  	  	  	
By:

	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
SECRETARY

	  	  	
___________________________________

	  	  
	  	  	  	
TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
# FILED May 27, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JUNE 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 03C 01-9610-CR-00369 Appellee, ) ) BRADLEY COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. MAYO L. MASHB URN, DONALD RAY SHIRLEY, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Aggravate d Robbery)

CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART

I respectfully dissent from t he majority’s modificat ion of the defendant’s sentence for the robbery at the Take Two Video store. Because I believe the enhanci ng factors support the maximum pri son term for this robbery, I would affirm its sentence in this regard. I concur

in all other aspects of the maj ority’s opinion.

_______________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge
Power of Attorney


Know all by these presents, that the undersigned (the "Reporting Person")
hereby constitutes and appoints each of Melanie A. DeMorrow, Assistant Vice
President-Shareholder Relations; Richard M. Lavers, Secretary; Joseph P.
Tomczak, Executive Vice President & C.F.O.; Kathy Samovitz, Associate
Counsel; and Jessica L. Long, Assistant Secretary,  signing singly, as the
Reporting Person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the Reporting Person, in the Reporting
Person's capacity as an officer or trustee of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 and such other similar forms as may be
required for filing in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules
thereunder;

(2) do and perform all acts for and on behalf of the Reporting Person
which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such forms
and timely file such forms with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority or other federal
agency; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
to, and in the best interest of, or legally required by, the Reporting
Person.

The Reporting Person hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the Reporting Person
might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or
revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or
such attorney-in-facts substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to
be done by the virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers
herein granted.  The Reporting Person acknowledges that the foregoing
attorneys-in fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the Reporting
Person, are not assuming, nor is the company assuming, any of the Reporting
Persons responsibilities to comply with any of the above specified laws or
regulations.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
Reporting Person is no longer required to file such forms with respect to the
Reporting Person's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the
Company, unless earlier revoked by the Reporting Person in a signed writing
delivered to the Secretary of  the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Reporting Person has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 12th day of June, 2004.



						s/Robert J. Deputy
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAUN RUSHING, )

AKA SHAUN AKINDOALEXANDER RUSHING )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00167 (UNA) 

)

U-HAUL STORAGE AND MOVING, )

)

Defendant. )

 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint, ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant 

plaintiff’s IFP application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 

Plaintiff, a resident of the District of Columbia, sues a U-Haul Storage and Moving 

business also located in the District. He alleges that, on January 17, he attempted to access his 

storage unit and was unfairly denied access to same. As a result, he contends that he had to leave 

his property unattended overnight and that it was stolen. He alleges that defendant committed 

“negligence” and “malpractice” and demands approximately $104 million in damages. So his 

claim appears to sound in tort or, perhaps, breach of contract. 

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth 

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available 

only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount 

in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts 
that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such 

facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 

First, plaintiff’s claims fail to raise any federal question. Second, both plaintiff and 

defendant are located in the District of Columbia, so there can be no diversity jurisdiction. See 

Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. 

Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373-74 (1978)) (“For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there 

must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the plaintiff may not be a 

citizen of the same state as any defendant.”). Therefore, this court cannot exercise subject matter 

jurisdiction over this matter. 

For all of these reasons, the complaint, ECF No. 1, and the case, is dismissed without 

prejudice. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 8, 2023 ___________/s/____________

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

 United States District Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.306 Form 6-K, report of foreign issuer pursuant to Rules 13a-16 (§ 240.13a-16 of this chapter) and 15d-16 (§ 240.15d-16 of this chapter) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This form shall be used by foreign issuers which are required to furnish reports pursuant to Rule 13a-16 (§ 240.13a-16 of this chapter) or 15d-16 (§ 240.15d-16 of this chapter) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

[33 FR 18995, Dec. 20, 1968]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 6-K, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Exploring Careers

              																								United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.						"Exploring Careers: Social Service Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2001-13" in *Exploring Careers*			(1979).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4731/item/499435, accessed on September 26, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §291j–10. Payments

Grants under this part shall be paid in advance or by way of reimbursement, in such installments and on such conditions, as in the judgment of the Secretary will best carry out the purposes of this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §633, as added Pub. L. 91–296, title III, §301, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 351.)
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1
                       New York Regional Rail Corporation
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Regional Rail Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Donald B. Hutton, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Donald B. Hutton
Donald B. Hutton, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer

May 11, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New York Regional Rail Corporation and will retained by New York
Regional Rail Corporation and furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

§ 201.74 Additional documents for USAID. In addition to the documents required for reimbursement, a bank shall retain in its files for a period of at least 3 years and shall make available to USAID promptly upon request a copy of any of the following documents which may pertain to an USAID-financed transaction: ( a ) Each letter of credit issued, confirmed, or advised by it, together with any extension or modification thereof;
( b ) Payment instructions received from the approved applicant;
( c ) Each application and agreement relating to such letter of credit or instructions for payment, together with any extension or modification thereof;
( d ) A detailed advice of the interest, commissions, expenses, or other items charged by it in connection with each such letter of credit or payment instructions.
#### § 120.35 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Gladys I. Miller et al., as Trustees of Alvin E. Ivie, Deceased. Alvin I. Kropff, Appellant; Irving Trust Company et al., Respondents.

— After preargument conference, appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 29, 1976, withdrawn, with prejudice and without costs to any party, but without prejudice as to any of *568the issues presently on appeal in Index Nos. 18922/1974, 18923/1974 and 18924/1974. Murphy, P. J.
Order entered May 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00677-CV

IN RE RONALD A. LOGSDON, Relator

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-50294-2012

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

JUSTICE
### §2312. Authorization of appropriations

(a) No appropriation shall be made to carry out the provisions and purposes of this chapter unless previously authorized by legislation enacted by Congress.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated the sum of $518,000 at Oak Ridge, the sum of $2,215,000 at Richland and the sum of $8,719,000 at Los Alamos for construction, modification, or expansion of municipal installations and utilities authorized to be transferred pursuant to subchapters VI and VII of this chapter.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 11, §118, 69 Stat. 484; July 25, 1956, ch. 731, §§5, 6, 70 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 87–719, §24, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 666; Pub. L. 90–190, §4, Dec. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–190 substituted provisions prohibiting making of appropriations to carry out provisions and purposes of this chapter unless previously authorized by legislation enacted by Congress for provisions granting authority to appropriate such sums as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out provisions and purposes of this chapter.

1962—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 87–719 authorized an appropriation of $8,719,000 at Los Alamos and use of appropriations for utilities.

1956—Subsec. (b). Act July 25, 1956, §6, substituted "$2,215,000" for "$2,165,000".

Subsec. (c). Act July 25, 1956, §5, repealed subsec. (c) which appropriated funds derived from disposal of property to pay any costs, losses, expenses, or obligations incurred by Commission. See section 2311(b) of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Internet
Infinity,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September
30, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, George P. Morris,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 21, 2005
                                                          /s/ George P. Morris
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George P. Morris
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 3:08-cv-00838-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-00838-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1975c. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated,1 to carry out this chapter $9,500,000 for fiscal year 1995. None of the sums authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1995 may be used to create additional regional offices.

(Pub. L. 98–183, §5, Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1304; Pub. L. 102–167, §2, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1101; Pub. L. 103–419, §2, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1975c, Pub. L. 85–315, pt. I, §104, Sept. 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 635; Pub. L. 86–383, title IV, §401, Sept. 28, 1959, 73 Stat. 724; Pub. L. 87–264, title IV, §401, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat. 559; Pub. L. 88–152, §2, Oct. 17, 1963, 77 Stat. 271; Pub. L. 88–352, title V, §504, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 251; Pub. L. 90–198, §1, Dec. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 582; Pub. L. 92–496, §§3, 4, Oct. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 813, 814; Pub. L. 95–444, §3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1067; Pub. L. 96–81, §2, Oct. 6, 1979, 93 Stat. 642, related to duties of Commission. See Codification note set out preceding section 1975 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–419 amended section generally, substituting provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for provisions relating to duties of Commission.

1991—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 102–167, which directed the insertion of "The Commission shall, in addition to any other reports under this section, submit at least one annual report that monitors Federal civil rights enforcement efforts in the United States to Congress and to the President." at the end of this section, was executed by making the insertion at the end of subsec. (f).

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 147

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019.

#### § 147.3 Definitions.

The Department of State adopts the definitions in E103.4 of appendix A to 36 CFR part 1194. In addition, as used in this part:

*Department* means the United States Department of State and any of its passport agencies or other facilities.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of State or his or her designee.

*Section 508* means section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, codified at 29 U.S.C. 794d.

[81 FR 32646, May 24, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019]
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Section
      1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/
      JAMES H. LONG


James
      H.
      Long


Chief
      Executive Officer





August
      6,
      2007










30
BEIJING

BRUSSELS

CENTURY CITY 

HONG KONG 

LONDON

LOS ANGELES 

2765 Sand Hill Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

TELEPHONE (650) 473-2600

FACSIMILE (650) 473-2601

www.omm.com 

NEW YORK 

SAN FRANCISCO 

SHANGHAI

SINGAPORE

TOKYO 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

WRITER’S DIRECT DIAL

(650) 473-2671 

WRITER’S E-MAIL ADDRESS

mlandy@omm.com

March 5, 2010 

VIA E-FILING

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, CA

Re: In re The PMI Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. C-08-1405-SI

Dear Judge Illston: 

 I am writing to inform the Court that the parties have selected Layn R. Phillips of Irell & 

Manella LLP as mediator. Due to scheduling conflicts, however, the parties will not be able to 

participate in mediation in April 2010, as they previously informed the Court. The parties now 

plan to participate in mediation with Judge Phillips (Ret.) in June 2010. Accordingly, the parties 

request that the Case Management Conference set for April 30, 2010 be vacated and rescheduled 

in July 2010, after the parties have had the opportunity to participate in mediation. The parties 

otherwise intend to adhere to the pretrial schedule ordered by the Court. 

Sincerely,

 /S/ 

Meredith N. Landy 

for O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

cc: Daniel S. Drosman, Esq. (Counsel to Lead Plaintiffs) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN D

T OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

The case management has been continued to Friday, July 9,

2010, at 3 p.m.

Case 3:08-cv-01405-SI Document 73 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries
of Broadmark Realty Capital Inc.



|Subsidiary                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|BRMK Lending, LLC                      |  | Delaware                                  
|BRMK Management, Corp.                 |  | Delaware                                  
|Broadmark Private REIT Management, LLC |  | Delaware                                  
|Cataldo Square, LLC                    |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF – Courthouse Lots, LLC          |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF – Independence Station, LLC     |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF Bella Commons, LLC              |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF Clearview Sheldon, LLC          |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF Honeysuckle, LLC                |  | Washington                                
|PBRELF Peak, LLC                       |  | Washington                                
|South Hill Meridian, LLC               |  | Washington