alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 428 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on telephone and other communications services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on telephone and other communications 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telephone Excise Tax 

5 Repeal Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND 

7 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subchapter B. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 428 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by 

3 striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed 

4 by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of 

5 chapter 33,’’ and inserting ‘‘and chapter 32 (other 

6 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 

7 4121),’’. 

8 (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such 

9 Code is amended by striking ‘‘section 4251 or’’. 

10 (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such 

11 Code is amended— 

12 (i) by striking ‘‘imposed by—’’ and all that 

13 follows through ‘‘with respect to’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect 

15 to’’, and 

16 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’. 

17 (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) 

18 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘COMMUNICA19 TIONS SERVICES AND’’. 

20 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by 

21 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap22 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’. 

23 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such 

24 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

25 subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (C), 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 428 IH

1 and by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subpara2 graph (C). 

3 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of 

4 such Code is amended by striking the item relating 

5 to subchapter B. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills 

8 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001019947
<NAME> CompuRAD, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,514,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,697,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                    403,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,662,098
<PP&E>                                         823,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                 155,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,330,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,299,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,551,969
<OTHER-SE>                                     470,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,330,249
<SALES>                                      2,443,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,443,469
<CGS>                                        1,193,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,193,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,408,256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (133,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (133,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (133,519)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Grudzien, appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company et al., operating as Chicago Surface Lines, appellants.

Gen. No. 27,584.

Action for damages to plaintiff’s automobile in a collision with *604defendants ’ street ear. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Oourt of Oook county; the Hon. Harry A. Lewis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1922.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed October 30, 1922.

Charles L. Mahony and Watson J. Perry, for appellants; J. R. Guilliams and Frank L. Kriete, of counsel. Novak & Novak, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
No. 829.

#### Campbell *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

May 24, 1937.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Appointments to the Citizens' Health Care Working Group

ACTION: Notice of application period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Comptroller General of the United States will appoint 14 
individuals, including a Chairperson, to serve as members of the 
Citizens' Health Care Working Group as required by the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) 
(Pub. L. 108-173). The Secretary of Health and Human Services also 
serves as a member of the Working Group and is required by the MMA to 
establish the Working Group. This group will help lead a nationwide 
public discussion and debate on ways to improve the health care system 
and provide every American with the ability to obtain quality and 
affordable health care coverage. The Working Group will make 
recommendations to the President and the Congress.
    Individuals interested in serving for the two-year term may apply 
online by visiting
http://citizenshealthcarewg.gao.gov. Individuals unable to apply online 
may call 866-324-9219 (toll-free) to request an application form. The 
closing date for accepting applications will be January 14, 2005. The 
Comptroller General will announce his appointments by late February 
2005.
    Closing Date: Applications must be postmarked by January 14, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GAO 866-324-9219 (toll-free).

    (Sec. 1014, Pub. L. 108-173, 117 Stat. 2066, 2441)

David M. Walker,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 04-27482 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAUDE BRYANT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SERVICE CORPORATION

INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-01190 SI

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST

TO COMPEL DEPOSITION

(Docket No. 286)

Plaintiff seek an order compelling SCI to produce Jane Jones, an SCI Vice President and a

named defendant, for deposition prior to June 4, 2010. Plaintiffs first sent the deposition notice on May

18. SCI offered a number of reasonable suggestions, including dividing the deposition between June

2 and 3 in order to allow plaintiffs’ counsel to attend the case management conference with this Court

in San Francisco on June 4; having one of plaintiffs’ attorneys attend the case management conference

and another attorney depose Ms. Jones on June 4; and making Ms. Jones available on June 10. Plaintiffs

rejected all of these proposals, and now assert that they “need to complete their depositions prior to June

4, 2010” in order to prepare for their class certification motion. 

Plaintiffs’ position is unreasonable. SCI offered to make Ms. Jones available prior to June 4 and

alternatively on June 4 itself, but plaintiffs rejected both of these proposals. If plaintiffs wish to depose

Ms. Jones prior to the date their certification motion is due, they must work with defense counsel to find

a mutually agreeable date without the Court’s intervention. The motion to compel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01190-SI Document 296 Filed 06/02/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 38.200 Core Principle 3.

The board of trade shall list on the contract market only contracts that are not readily susceptible to manipulation.
### §§290bb–3 to 290bb–5. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIII, §3301(c)(1)–(3), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1209

Section 290bb–3, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §510, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §109, July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 342, related to demonstration projects of national significance.

A prior section 510 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 290bb of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–321, §122(b)(1). Prior to repeal, section 510(b) of act July 1, 1944, was renumbered section 464H(b) by Pub. L. 102–321 and transferred to section 285n(b) of this title.

Another prior section 510 of act July 1, 1944, which was classified to section 228 of this title, was successively renumbered by subsequent acts and transferred, see section 238g of this title.

Section 290bb–4, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §511, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §110, July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 343, related to grants for substance abuse treatment in State and local criminal justice systems.

A prior section 511 of act July 1, 1944, which was classified to section 290bb–1 of this title, was renumbered section 464J of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321 and transferred to section 285n–2 of this title.

Another prior section 511 of act July 1, 1944, which was classified to section 229 of this title, was successively renumbered by subsequent acts and transferred, see section 238h of this title.

Section 290bb–5, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §512, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §111, July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 344, related to training in provision of treatment services.

A prior section 512 of act July 1, 1944, which was classified to section 290bb–1a of this title, was renumbered section 506 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321 and transferred to section 290aa–5 of this title.

Another prior section 512 of act July 1, 1944, was renumbered section 513 by Pub. L. 98–509 and classified to section 290bb–2 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–321, §122(d)[(e)].

Another prior section 512 of act July 1, 1944, which was classified to section 229a of this title, was successively renumbered by subsequent acts and transferred, see section 238i of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Marquez, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 302]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), rendered on or about November 24, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
### §§290aa–6 to 290aa–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 290aa–6, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §508, as added Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4005(a), 100 Stat. 3207–111, and amended, which related to the Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, was renumbered section 515 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §113(b), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 345, and transferred to section 290bb–21 of this title.

Section 290aa–7, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §509, as added Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4005(a), 100 Stat. 3207–112, which related to Alcohol and Drug Abuse Information Clearinghouse, was renumbered section 516 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §113(f)(1)–(3), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 345, and transferred to section 290bb–22 of this title.

Section 290aa–8, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §509A, as added Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4005(a), 100 Stat. 3207–113, and amended, which related to alcohol and drug abuse prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation model projects for high risk youth, was renumbered section 517 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §114(a), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 346, transferred to section 290bb–23 of this title, and repealed by Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248.
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2019, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-C Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2022 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To
        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ Scott Cooke
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carmine Stella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November  21, 2005                  /s/Carmine Stella
                                           -------------------
                                           Carmine Stella
                                           President and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
§ 19.9-1 Entitlement. ( a ) Unless otherwise expressly provided by a spousal agreement under § 19.7 or a court order under § 19.6, a person who, after February 15, 1981, becomes a former spouse of a participant (or former participant who separated from the Service after February 15, 1981) and who has not remarried prior to becoming 60 years of age, becomes entitled to a monthly pension benefit effective on a date determined under § 19.9-2 in an amount determined under § 19.9-3.
( b ) A former spouse shall not be qualified for a pension under this subsection if, before the commencement of that pension, the former spouse remarries before becoming 60 years of age.
( c ) A pension benefit under this section is treated the same as a survivor annuity for purposes of § 19.11-5(b): a former spouse who elects to receive a pension under this section must waive simultaneous receipt of any survivor annuity.
[46 FR 12958, Feb. 19, 1981. Redesignated and amended at 46 FR 18970, Mar. 27, 1981]
### §285d–5. Arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases demonstration projects

#### (a) Grants for establishment and support

The Director of the Institute may make grants to public and private nonprofit entities to establish and support projects for the development and demonstration of methods for screening, detection, and referral for treatment of arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases and for the dissemination of information on such methods to the health and allied health professions. Activities under such projects shall be coordinated with Federal, State, local, and regional health agencies, centers assisted under section 285d–6 of this title, and the data system established under subsection (c).

#### (b) Programs included

Projects supported under this section shall include—

(1) programs which emphasize the development and demonstration of new and improved methods of screening and early detection, referral for treatment, and diagnosis of individuals with a risk of developing arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases;

(2) programs which emphasize the development and demonstration of new and improved methods for patient referral from local hospitals and physicians to appropriate centers for early diagnosis and treatment;

(3) programs which emphasize the development and demonstration of new and improved means of standardizing patient data and recordkeeping;

(4) programs which emphasize the development and demonstration of new and improved methods of dissemination of knowledge about the programs, methods, and means referred to in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subsection to health and allied health professionals;

(5) programs which emphasize the development and demonstration of new and improved methods for the dissemination to the general public of information—

(A) on the importance of early detection of arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases, of seeking prompt treatment, and of following an appropriate regimen; and

(B) to discourage the promotion and use of unapproved and ineffective diagnostic, preventive treatment, and control methods for arthritis and unapproved and ineffective drugs and devices for arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases; and

(6) projects for investigation into the epidemiology of all forms and aspects of arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases, including investigations into the social, environmental, behavioral, nutritional, and genetic determinants and influences involved in the epidemiology of arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases.

#### (c) Standardization of patient data and recordkeeping

The Director shall provide for the standardization of patient data and recordkeeping for the collection, storage, analysis, retrieval, and dissemination of such data in cooperation with projects assisted under this section, centers assisted under section 285d–6 of this title, and other persons engaged in arthritis and musculoskeletal disease programs.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §440, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 850.)
#### § 1509.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.