alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 144.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to Deputy Assistant Secretary for Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights, Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Room 3214, Washington, DC 20520.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 144.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22890, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22890, June 23, 1986]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ECOPY, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-04227 JSW

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

In light of the pendency of discovery disputes before Magistrate Judge James, this Court

VACATES the case management conferences set in this and related matters. The case

management shall be CONTINUED until April 9, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. An updated joint case

management statement shall be filed no later than April 2, 2010. If the discovery disputes are

resolved earlier, the parties shall immediately notify the Court and submit a joint case

management conference statement within 7 days of the resolution. The Court will then advance

the case management conference, if possible.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01035-JSW Document 68 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1506.11 May I request a review of the existence or amount of a claim? ( a ) USADF shall provide the debtor with a reasonable opportunity for an internal review of the existence or amount of the debt. For offset of current Federal salary under 5 U.S.C. 5514, a debtor may also request a hearing. (See subpart C of this part).
( b ) A request for a review must be submitted in writing to the appropriate contact office by the payment due date indicated in the Bill for Collection or demand letter. The request must state the basis for the debtor's dispute of the claim and include any relevant documentation in support. ( 1 ) USADF will provide for an internal review of the debt by an appropriate official. The review may include examination of documents, internal discussions with relevant officials and discussions with the debtor, at USADF's discretion.
( 2 ) An oral hearing is not required when USADF determines that the matter can be decided on the documentary record. When an oral hearing is not required, USADF shall accord the debtor a “paper hearing,” that is, a determination of the request for reconsideration based upon a review of the written record.
( 3 ) Unless otherwise required by law, an oral hearing under this section is not required to be a formal evidentiary hearing, although USADF will carefully document all significant matters discussed at the hearing.
Order entered November 16 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00954 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF T.J., W.J. AND T.J., CHILDREN On Appeal fr om the 199th Judicial Dist r ict Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 30035 - 2021

O RDER Mother ’ s brief in this term ina tion of parental rights case is overdue. Because these types of cases must be handled expeditiously, Mother is ORDERED to file h er brief by Decembe r 1, 2022

. See T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2(a) (appeal o f termination of the par ent

- child relationship should, so far as

reasona bly possible, be dispos ed of within 180 of the date the not ice of app eal is filed)

. F ailure to file the brie f by the time s pecified may result in an order for the tria l court to condu ct a hearing to determine why Mother ’s brief has not been filed

. See T E X . R. A PP . P . 38.9(a)(2)./s/ DEN N I SE GARCIA JUSTICE
### §2297f–1. Licensing of other technologies

#### (a) In general

Corporation facilities using alternative technologies for uranium enrichment, including AVLIS, shall be licensed under sections 2073, 2093, and 2243 of this title.

#### (b) Costs for decontamination and decommissioning

The Corporation shall provide for the costs of decontamination and decommissioning of any Corporation facilities described in subsection (a) in accordance with the requirements of the amendments made by section 5 of the Solar, Wind, Waste, and Geothermal Power Production Act of 1990.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1702, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title XI, §1101, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2953; amended Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3116(b)(4), Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5 of the Solar, Wind, Waste, and Geothermal Power Production Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 5 of Pub. L. 101–575, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2835, which enacted section 2243 of this title and amended sections 2014, 2061, 2201, and 2284 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–134 substituted "including" for "other than" and "sections 2073, 2093, and 2243" for "sections 2073 and 2093".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to United States Enrichment Corporation

References to the Corporation, meaning the United States Enrichment Corporation, deemed, as of the privatization date (July 28, 1998), to be references to the private corporation, see section 3116(e) of Pub. L. 104–134, set out as a note under former section 2297 of this title.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**
I, Brian Fontana, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of I-Sector Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
    Date: May 16, 2005 By:     /s/ BRIAN FONTANA Brian Fontana, Vice President
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.M., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4381

[November 9, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacy M. Ross, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16000866 DLA.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Travis Dunnington, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick T. Doyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                                                                                       |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ PATRICK T. DOYLEPatrick T. Doyle
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|November 7, 2007                                                                       |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julius Costanzo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on January 30, 1976, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.
§ 1006.870 When do I know if the debarring official debars me? ( a ) The debarring official must make a written decision whether to debar within 45 days of closing the official record. The official record closes upon the debarring official's receipt of final submissions, information and findings of fact, if any. The debarring official may extend that period for good cause.
( b ) The debarring official sends you written notice, pursuant to § 1006.615 that the official decided, either— ( 1 ) Not to debar you; or
( 2 ) To debar you. In this event, the notice: ( i ) Refers to the Notice of Proposed Debarment;
( ii ) Specifies the reasons for your debarment;
( iii ) States the period of your debarment, including the effective dates; and
( iv ) Advises you that your debarment is effective for covered transactions and contracts that are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1), throughout the executive branch of the Federal Government unless an agency head or an authorized designee grants an exception.
March 28, 2016 

The Honorable Charlie Baker 

Governor of the Commonwealth 

 of Massachusetts 

Boston, MA 02133 

Dear Governor Baker: 

On February 27, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a letter 

requesting your appointment of a State Liaison Officer (SLO) to act as the Commonwealth of 

Massachusetts’s primary liaison to the NRC. A copy of this letter is enclosed. To date we 

have not received an appointment letter from your office; however, the NRC has continued to 

work with the SLO appointed by a former governor: Mr. John Giarrusso, Section Chief for 

Planning, Nuclear, and Preparedness in the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency. 

To ensure continued clear communication between the NRC and the Commonwealth of 

Massachusetts, I would appreciate receiving your written affirmation of Mr. Giarrusso or 

another individual as your selected appointee as SLO for the Commonwealth of 

Massachusetts. 

If you or your staff have any questions concerning this correspondence or wish to obtain 

additional information about the SLO program, please contact Mr. Daniel Collins, Director, 

Division of Material Safety, State, Tribal, and Rulemaking Programs, Office of Nuclear Material 

Safety and Safeguards, at (301) 415-3340 or by e-mail at Daniel.Collins@nrc.gov. 

I thank you in advance for your assistance. The Commission looks forward to the 

continued participation by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the NRC’s SLO program. 

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

 

cc: John Giarrusso, Jr., Massachusetts 

 Emergency Management Agency
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF T/F PURIFINER, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1997,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           704,182 
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    224,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                      40,991
<INVENTORY>                                      553,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,699,687 
<PP&E>                                           462,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   145,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,324,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            723,143     
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,145     
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,210,212   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,324,814
<SALES>                                          415,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 415,901
<CGS>                                            272,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    272,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 813,264                                      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (672,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (672,330) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (672,330)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.13)  

        

</TABLE>
#### Marvin H. Wolf, Appellant, v Jean Mackey, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the *813Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 19, 1977, as denied his motion for summary judgment. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and action remanded to Special Term to ascertain and compute the amount due the plaintiff as principal and interest on the obligation and mortgage. The mortgage in question was executed by defendant-respondent to secure the payment of legal fees to plaintiff-appellant; the fees were set forth in a separate agreement, which had also been signed by respondent. The retainer agreement and mortgage are complete as to the services to be rendered, the amount of compensation, the method of payment and the security for payment. The respondent is therefore barred from offering parol evidence which contradicts the terms of payment as set forth in the agreement. Also, the respondent’s allegations that she was led to believe that the conditions of payment would be altered in the event that plaintiff lost the case for which he had been retained, are insufficient to raise a factual issue of fraud. Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
NUMBER 13-18-00425-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SHANNON DEAN DAVENPORT, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Shannon Dean Davenport, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court 

from his conviction in trial court cause number A-16-5090-CR. The trial court's 

certification of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the 

right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 
2

On August 8, 2018, we ordered appellant's counsel, Michael D. George, to, within 

thirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. No response to this Court's order has been 

received. Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a 

hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order. The trial 

court's findings and conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The 

trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with the 

Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in this 

matter, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to 

appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988); Stafford v. State, 

813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue 

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find 

that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed 

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, 

email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included 

in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

19th day of September, 2018.
#### Ethel Kannaley, as Administratrix of the Estate of William J. Kannaley, Deceased, Respondent, v. Mary Weiss et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the January Term, beginning January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before December 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1475** 

CATHERINE GIERBOLINI , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS SCIENCE APPLICATION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, John P. Thumper; K. Stuart Shea; Mark W. Sopp; Thomas G. Baybrook , Joseph W. Carver, III; Anthony J. Maraco; Deborah Lee James; Amy E. Alving; Laura Kennedy; James E. Cuff; Brian F. Keenan; Vincent A. Maffeo , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:13

- 00103

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Catherine Gierbolini , Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Catherine Gierbolini appeals the district court ’ s
order dismissing her civil action

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gierbolini v. Bd. o f Dir. Sci. App lication Int’l Corp. , No. 1:13

- cv - 00103

- LMB

- IDD (E.D.
Va. Mar. 15, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED