alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 74493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1361]


Approval for Expansion of Subzone 77A, Sharp Manufacturing 
Company of America Plant (Microwave Ovens, Computer Products, and Solar 
Cell Modules); Shelby County, TN

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the City of Memphis, Tennessee, grantee of FTZ 77, has 
requested authority on behalf of Sharp Manufacturing Company of America 
to expand the scope of manufacturing authority under zone procedures 
(multifunction office machines and solar cell modules) at Subzone 77A 
at the Sharp Manufacturing Company of America plant in Shelby County, 
Tennessee (FTZ Docket 61-2003, filed 11/6/2003);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (68 FR 65246, 11/19/03);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand the scope of authority under zone 
procedures within Subzone 77A on behalf of the Sharp Manufacturing 
Company of America, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of December, 2004.
James J. Jochum,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-27377 Filed 12-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### § 32.1 Scope.

The provisions of this part shall apply to all commodity option transactions, except for commodity option transactions on a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery conducted or executed on or subject to the rules of either a designated contract market or a foreign board of trade.
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.515 Are there any exceptions to those actions?

The Procurement Executive may waive with respect to a particular award, in writing, a suspension of payments under an award, suspension or termination of an award, or suspension or debarment of a recipient if the Procurement Executive determines that such a waiver would be in the public interest. This exception authority cannot be delegated to any other official.
§ 1701.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1701.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75310-75311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7848-5]


Whitehouse Oil Pits Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), the Environmental Protection Agency 
proposes to enter into a settlement with Mrs. Eloise Gleaton concerning 
the Whitehouse Oil Pits Superfund Site near Jacksonville, Duval County, 
Florida. To resolve her potential liability at the Site, the Agreement 
requires Mrs. Gleaton to deed certain property and grant a temporary 
easement over other property to the City of Jacksonville that is needed 
for remediation of the Site. The Agreement also requires Mrs. Gleaton 
to place well drilling restrictions on certain property so as not to 
interfere with the integrity of the remedy being implemented at the 
Site. EPA will consider comments on the settlement until January 18, 
2005. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to

[[Page 75311]]

the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations 
which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or 
inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from:
    Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 4, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#206241544348454c4f520e7041554c41606570610e676f76"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92d0f3e6f1faf7fefde0bcc2f3e7fef3d2d7c2d3bcd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above 
address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: December 1, 2004.
Rosalind H. Brown,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste 
Management Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27552 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION TRANSFO RM ERS

CHAPTERS

CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER 2. CHAPTER 3. CHAPTER 4. CHAPTER 5. CHAPTER 6. CHAPTER 7. CHAPTER 8. CHAPTER 9. CHAPTER 10. CHAPTER 11. CHAPTER 12. CHAPTER 13. CHAPTER 14. INTRODUCTION

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SCREENING ANALYSIS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ENERGY USE AND END-USE LOAD CHARACTERIZATION MARKUPS FOR EQUIPMENT PRICE DETERMINATION LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PAYBACK PERIOD ANALYSES SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS NATIONAL IMPACT ANALYSIS LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS MANUFACTURER IMPACT ANALYSIS UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS EMPLOYMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS

REPORTS

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 5A: APPENDIX 5B: APPENDIX 8A: APPENDIX 8B: APPENDIX 8C: APPENDIX 8D: APPENDIX 1OA: SUPPLEMENTARY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS RESULTS

SCALING RELATIONSHIPS IN MANUFACTURING LCC AND PBP RESULTS UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY UTILITIES SAMPLE LCC SENSITIVITY RESULTS NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS AND NET NATIONAL PRESENT VALUE RESULTS

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TOC-i
#### § 1.1 Office of the Secretary of State.

The official flag indicative of the office of Secretary of State shall be as follows: On a blue rectangular field a white disk bearing the official coat of arms of the United States adopted by the act of June 20, 1782, in proper colors. In each of the four corners a white five-pointed star with one point upward. The colors and automobile flag to be the same design, adding a white fringe. For the colors a cord and tassel of blue and white to be added. The sizes to be in accordance with military and naval customs.

[22 FR 10788, Dec. 27, 1957]
### §290aa–5b. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title IX, §9017, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1248

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §506B, as added Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXVI, §3665(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1244, related to grants for ecstasy and other club drugs abuse prevention.
Exhibit 10.2(b)


      Schedule of Warrant (new financings after October 31, 2005) Issued by
             NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on January 24, 2006


                      Expiration                                      Shares
     Grant Date          Date            Exercise Price               Granted
     ----------         -----            --------------               -------
      01/24/06        01/24/11       Greater of:  (i) $0.0033;      20,000,000
                                     or (ii) the par value of
                                     NCT Group, Inc.
                                     common stock on the
                                     date of exercise
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Description
      of Board Fees

    


    Directors
      receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended, $1,500 for each committee
      meeting attended, $600 for each board meeting of the Company’s subsidiary,
      Finance Maryland, LLC attended, and $250 for each meeting of First Mariner
      Bank’s Loan Committee attended, consisting of one outside director. The members
      of the Audit Committee receive $2,500 for each Audit Committee attended.
      Directors also receive a yearly grant of stock options to purchase 500 shares
      of
      common stock and are granted stock options to purchase 100 shares of common
      stock for each committee meeting they attend.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Galeand, Also Known as Jason Galeano, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 558]

*772Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Harris, J., at plea; Laura A. Ward, J., at sentence), rendered March 23, 2005, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court appropriately exercised its discretion by declining to grant defendant youthful offender treatment *(see People v Drayton,*39 NY2d 580 [1976]). Defendant received multiple opportunities for drug treatment, but repeatedly absconded from or otherwise failed to complete the programs, and was rearrested on three separate occasions. Accordingly, the court properly concluded that defendant was not deserving of further leniency. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              99
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,379
<PP&E>                                         229,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 500,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,613
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,162
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   500,546
<SALES>                                        389,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               389,917
<CGS>                                          334,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (304)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (771)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Subpart 3443.1—General

Parent topic: PART 3443—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

3443.107 Contract clause.

The contracting officer must insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 3452.243–70

(Key personnel) in all solicitations and contracts in which it will be essential for the contracting

officer to be notified that a change of designated key personnel is to take place by the contractor.
§ 33.6 Suspension or revocation of designation as a contract market for the trading of commodity options. The Commission may, after notice and opportunity for a hearing on the record, suspend or revoke the designation of any board of trade as a contract market in a commodity option for which it is designated if the Commission determines that: ( a ) The board of trade, or any director, officer, agent, or employee thereof, is violating or has violated any of the provisions of this part.
( b ) Cause exists which, under § 33.2 or § 33.4, would warrant the denial of a designation;
( c ) The option market is not used on more than an occasional basis for other than speculative purposes by producers, processors, merchants or commercial users engaged in handling or utilizing the commodity (including the products, by-products or source commodity thereof) underlying an option, in interstate commerce; or
( d ) Option trading on the contract market in that contract is contrary to the protection of option customers or the underlying futures or cash markets, or is otherwise contrary to the public interest: *Provided,* That pending completion of any proceeding under this section, the Commission may suspend such designation for the duration of the proceedings, if in the Commission's judgment, the continuation of such trading presents a substantial risk to the public interest.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3038-0007) [46 FR 54529, Nov. 3, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 63036, Dec. 30, 1981; 47 FR 57018, Dec. 22, 1982]
#### § 1006.875 May I ask the debarring official to reconsider a decision to debar me?

Yes, as a debarred person you may ask the debarring official to reconsider the debarment decision or to reduce the time period or scope of the debarment. However, you must put your request in writing and support it with documentation.
§ 1506.25 When will deduction from my pay account begin? ( a ) Deductions to liquidate an employee's debt will begin on the date stated in the Agency's Bill for Collection or demand letter notice of intention to collect from the employee's current pay, unless the debt has been repaid in full or the employee has filed a timely request for hearing.
( b ) If an employee files a timely request for hearing, deductions will begin after the hearing official has provided the employee with a final written decision indicating the amount owed to the Government. Following the decision by the hearing official, the employee will be given 30 days to repay the amount owed prior to collection through salary offset, unless otherwise provided by the hearing official.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Floyd Dinan, Frank Poplees, Also Known as Frank Day and Albert Bricker, Appellants.

Pursuant to section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the defendants, who have Been released by virtue of a certificate of reasonable doubt, move to extend their time to argue their pending appeal and for a further stay of the judgment of conviction pending the determination of the appeal. Motion granted, and defendants’ time enlarged to the January 1961 Term, on condition that they perfect their appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at -said term. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ayaz Kassam, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ Ayaz
Kassam
 Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 
 Date: 
June 15, 2009
### §254i. Annual report to Congress; contents

The Secretary shall submit an annual report to Congress, and shall include in such report with respect to the previous calendar year—

(1) the number, identity, and priority of all health professional shortage areas designated in such year and the number of health professional shortage areas which the Secretary estimates will be designated in the subsequent year;

(2) the number of applications filed under section 254f of this title in such year for assignment of Corps members and the action taken on each such application;

(3) the number and types of Corps members assigned in such year to health professional shortage areas, the number and types of additional Corps members which the Secretary estimates will be assigned to such areas in the subsequent year, and the need for additional members for the Corps;

(4) the recruitment efforts engaged in for the Corps in such year and the number of qualified individuals who applied for service in the Corps in such year;

(5) the number of patients seen and the number of patient visits recorded during such year with respect to each health professional shortage area to which a Corps member was assigned during such year;

(6) the number of Corps members who elected, and the number of Corps members who did not elect, to continue to provide health services in health professional shortage areas after termination of their service in the Corps and the reasons (as reported to the Secretary) of members who did not elect for not making such election;

(7) the results of evaluations and determinations made under section 254f(a)(1)(D) of this title during such year; and

(8) the amount charged during such year for health services provided by Corps members, the amount which was collected in such year by entities in accordance with section 254g of this title, and the amount which was paid to the Secretary in such year under such agreements.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §336A, formerly §336, as added Pub. L. 94–484, title IV, §407(b)(3), Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2277, renumbered §336A, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXVII, §2706(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 907; amended Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §206(a), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1823; Pub. L. 101–597, title IV, §401(b)[(a)], Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3035; Pub. L. 107–251, title III, §307(b), Oct. 26, 2002, 116 Stat. 1649.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (8). Pub. L. 107–251 struck out "agreements under" after "in accordance with".

1990—Pars. (1), (3), (5), (6). Pub. L. 101–597 substituted reference to health professional shortage area for reference to health manpower shortage area wherever appearing.

1982—Pub. L. 97–375 struck out "on May 1 of each year" after "report to Congress".
#### § 1503.1 Authority.

Pursuant to section 506(a)(3) of Pub. L. 96-533, the African Development Foundation official seal and design thereof, which accompanies and is made part of this document, is hereby adopted, approved, and judicially noticed.
§ 1508.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions? The following types of nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions: ( a ) A direct award to— ( 1 ) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
( 2 ) A public international organization;
( 3 ) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a foreign government; or
( 4 ) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
( b ) A benefit to an individual as a personal entitlement without regard to the individual's present responsibility (but benefits received in an individual's business capacity are not excepted). For example, if a person receives social security benefits under the Supplemental Security Income provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1301 *et seq.,* those benefits are not covered transactions and, therefore, are not affected if the person is excluded.
( c ) Federal employment.
( d ) A transaction that the African Development Foundation needs to respond to a national or agency-recognized emergency or disaster.
( e ) A permit, license, certificate, or similar instrument issued as a means to regulate public health, safety, or the environment, unless the African Development Foundation specifically designates it to be a covered transaction.
( f ) An incidental benefit that results from ordinary governmental operations.
( g ) Any other transaction if the application of an exclusion to the transaction is prohibited by law.