alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1508.100 What does this part do?

This part adopts a governmentwide system of debarment and suspension for ADF nonprocurement activities. It also provides for reciprocal exclusion of persons who have been excluded under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and provides for the consolidated listing of all persons who are excluded, or disqualified by statute, executive order, or other legal authority. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF: P."Z."G.R., DA 21-0543

A Youth in Need ofCare. 

### JAN 0 4 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the petition of Appellate Defender Chad Wright for leave to file an out-of-time appeal on the Father's behalf, pursuant to M. R. App. P.4(6). Thepetition includes anAffidavit oftrial counsel Michael Strandwith explanation that due to his illness, absence from the office, and miscommunication with Father, he did not timely perfect Father's appeal. The order terminatingFather's parental rights was issued by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, on October 4, 2021, in Cause No. DN 17-156. To guarantee that Father's right to appeal is protected, the Appellate Defender requests an orderpermittingan out-of-time appeal fromthat Order. IfFather isnotpermittedtoappeal, it would constitute a gross miscarriage ofjustice and unduly punish him. The petition further states the Attorney General has no objection. Given the importance ofthe interests at stake for the Father, and without objection, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for leave to file an out-of-time appeal is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellate Defender shall have ten days from the date of this Order within which to file a Notice of Appeal. The Appellate Defender shall immediately order the appropriate transcripts, ifthey have not been already ordered. 01/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0543

### record.

The Clerk ofthis Court is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel of DATED this

—1 day ofJanuary, 2022.

2 

### Justices
§ 1502.4 Written requests. In order to facilitate the processing of written requests, every petitioner should: ( a ) Address his or her request to: Chief FOIA Officer, United States African Development Foundation, 1400 I Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. Both the envelope and the request itself, or the email, should be clearly marked: “Freedom of Information Act Request.”
( b ) Identify the desired record by name, title, author, a brief description, or number, and date, as applicable. The identification should be specific enough so that a record can be identified and found without unreasonably burdening or disrupting the operations of the Foundation. If the Foundation determines that a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, the requestor shall be advised what additional information is needed or informed why the request is insufficient.
( c ) Include a check or money order to the order of the “United States African Development Foundation” covering the appropriate search and copying fees, or a request for determination of the fee, or a specified amount that the requestor is willing to pay in connection with the FOIA request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos T. Wynn, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 9, 1975, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and sexual abuse in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the facts, and indictment dismissed. The sole evidence connecting defendant-appellant with the crime charged was the identification by the complaining witness. She had identified defendant after a series of prejudicial showups. Testimony relating thereto was suppressed by the court after a *Wade*hearing. However, the complaining witness was permitted to identify defendant in court. The description given by her to the police after the incident differed from defendant’s physical appearance with respect to height, facial hair and complexion. The weak identification evidence, coupled with the fact that it took complainant 20 minutes before she could identify the defendant at the showup which was held in close proximity to the time of the commission of the alleged crime, convinces us that defendant’s guilt was not established *938beyond a reasonable doubt. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
### §300a–2. Conduct, etc., of research activities

The Secretary may—

(1) conduct, and

(2) make grants to public or nonprofit private entities and enter into contracts with public or private entities and individuals for projects for,

research in the biomedical, contraceptive development, behavioral, and program implementation fields related to family planning and population.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title X, §1004, as added Pub. L. 91–572, §6(c), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1507; amended Pub. L. 93–45, title I, §111(c), June 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 93; Pub. L. 94–63, title II, §202(c), title VII, §701(d), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 306, 352; Pub. L. 95–83, title III, §305(c), Aug. 1, 1977, 91 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 95–613, §1(b)(3), Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3093; Pub. L. 96–32, §1(a), July 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 82; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §931(b)(2), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 570.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 redesignated existing subsec. (a) as entire section, and struck out subsec. (b) which related to authorization and availability of appropriations.

1979—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 95–613, as amended by Pub. L. 96–32, substituted "$120,800,000" for "$3,600,000" as authorized appropriation for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1980.

1978—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 95–613 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years ending Sept. 30, 1979, 1980, and 1981.

1977—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–83 in par. (1) substituted provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years ending Sept. 30, 1977 and 1978, for prior such authorization for fiscal year 1977, and in par. (2) prohibited use of funds for administration of this section.

1975—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–63, §202(c), revised structure of provisions, inserted authorization for Secretary to conduct research, and struck out authority for grants and contracts in research training in specified fields.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–63, §§202(c), 701(d), revised structure of provisions and substituted provisions relating to authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 1976 and 1977 and availability of appropriated funds, for provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years ending June 30, 1971, through fiscal year ending June 30, 1975.

1973—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–45 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal year ending June 30, 1974.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–32, §1(b), July 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 82, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall be effective as of November 8, 1978."

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by section 202(c) of Pub. L. 94–63 effective July 1, 1975, see section 608 of Pub. L. 94–63, set out as a note under section 247b of this title.
#### § 1008.655 Individual.

*Individual* means a natural person.
US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Room 1E-245 September 30, 2004



## Purpose

The Department will present its methodology for the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) analysis and example results. The Department also will explain its plans for the remaining analysis—the analysis to support the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—and will seek input from stak eholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.



## Agenda

9:00 Welcome

Introduction and Agenda Review

Rulemaking overview This is an overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and

the issues on which DOE w ould like input during today’s meeting.

Comments from Participants This is an open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or id entify their key issues regarding the ANOPR analyses, methods, and data.

Engineering Analysis This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and engineering analysis, and a char acterization of the results.

BreakLife-Cycle Cost Analysis This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors cons idered for the life-cycle cost analysis, building energy use and end-use load characterization, markups, and payback period analysis, and a characterization of the results.

Lunch (on your own)

National Impact Analysis This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors c onsidered for the national energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis, and a characterization of the results.

Discussion of Other Issues This is an open forum to discuss any remaining questions or issues identified by participants.

Break

Manufacturer Impact Analysis and other Proposed Rule-Stage Analyses, and Next Steps This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the planned revisions to the ANOPR analyses, and the planned approach and factors that will be considered for the manufacturer, utility, employment, and regulatory impact analyses, and the envir onmental assessment.

Final Discussions This is an opportunity to discuss any outstanding issues.

5:00 pm Adjourn
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.3(4)-3 Definitions of “participates” and “participation” as used in section 303(4), in relation to certain transactions. ( a ) The terms *participates* and *participation* in section 303(4) shall not include the interest of a person ( 1 ) who is neither in privity of contract with the issuer nor affiliated with the issuer, and
( 2 ) who has no association with any principal underwriter of the securities being distributed, and
( 3 ) whose function in the distribution is confined to an undertaking to purchase all or some specified proportion of the securities remaining unsold after the lapse of some specified period of time, and
( 4 ) who purchases such securities for investment and not with a view to distribution.
( b ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) The term *association* shall include a relationship between two persons under which one ( i ) is affiliated with the other, or
( ii ) has, in common with the other, one or more partners, directors, officers, trustees, branch managers, or other persons occupying a similar status or performing similar functions or
( iii ) has a participation, direct or indirect, in the profits of the other, or has a financial stake, by debtor-creditor relationship, stock ownership, contract or otherwise, in the income or business of the other.
( 2 ) The term *principal underwriter* means an underwriter in privity of contract with the issuer of the securities as to which he is underwriter.
#### In the Matter of Vincent Frederico, Respondent, v Edgar E. Moore et al., Constituting the Town Board of Riga, Appellants.

Motion granted and memorandum decision (57 AD2d 704) amended by striking therefrom the second last paragraph and inserting in place thereof the following: "Accordingly, since petitioner complied with the application requirements, respondents were properly directed by Supreme Court to issue a permit to him.” Present.—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment #1) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Alexander V.
Lagerborg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Alexander V. Lagerborg
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Alexander V. Lagerborg, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: JULY 11, 2006
# tAA-2.0'0- 

# Os-I" Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization PersonContacted National Business Aircrafl A~sodation Eli Coni 

### Date 

## ,y.j "?: I/'il 

### ....., -"

.. / 

### Response Rl'giomti Airline Association Aircraft Owners S.: Pilots Association ATA 1>:1 

### vc Loiterer Robert Iia('kman Craig fabi:1lI M Lopez 

# ,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7216
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT ELTON STOTTS, a/k/a Sugarbear, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RBS-7) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 3, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Elton Stotts, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Elton Stotts appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies and collecting cases adopting rule). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. The district court entered its order denying the § 3582(c)(2) motion on May 8, 2006. The ten-day appeal period expired on May 22, 2006. SeeFed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2). Stotts filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, on June 23, 2006—outside both the ten-day appeal period and the thirty-day excusable neglect period, which expired on June 21, 2006. Therefore, Stotts’ notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and- 3 - legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1508.440 What method do I use to communicate those requirements to participants?

To communicate the requirements to participants, you must include a term or condition in the transaction requiring the participant's compliance with subpart C of this part, and requiring them to include a similar term or condition in lower tier covered transactions.
### §285d–4. Interagency coordinating committees

#### (a) Establishment and purpose

For the purpose of—

(1) better coordination of the research activities of all the national research institutes relating to arthritis, musculoskeletal diseases, and skin diseases, including sports-related disorders; and

(2) coordinating the aspects of all Federal health programs and activities relating to arthritis, musculoskeletal diseases, and skin diseases in order to assure the adequacy and technical soundness of such programs and activities and in order to provide for the full communication and exchange of information necessary to maintain adequate coordination of such programs and activities,

the Secretary shall establish an Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Interagency Coordinating Committee and a Skin Diseases Interagency Coordinating Committee (hereafter in this section individually referred to as a "Committee").

#### (b) Membership; chairman; meetings

Each Committee shall be composed of the Directors of each of the national research institutes and divisions involved in research regarding the diseases with respect to which the Committee is established, the Under Secretary for Health of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (or the designees of such officers), and representatives of all other Federal departments and agencies (as determined by the Secretary) whose programs involve health functions or responsibilities relevant to arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases or skin diseases, as the case may be. Each Committee shall be chaired by the Director of NIH (or the designee of the Director). Each Committee shall meet at the call of the chairman, but not less often than four times a year.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §439, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 849; amended Pub. L. 102–405, title III, §302(e)(1), Oct. 9, 1992, 106 Stat. 1985; Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2008(b)(6), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 211; Pub. L. 105–362, title VI, §601(a)(1)(D), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3285.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–362 struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "Not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, each Committee shall prepare and transmit to the Secretary, the Director of NIH, the Director of the Institute, and the advisory council for the Institute a report detailing the activities of the Committee in such fiscal year in carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) of this section."

1993—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–43 substituted "Department of Veterans Affairs" for "Veterans' Administration".

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–405 substituted "Under Secretary for Health" for "Chief Medical Director".
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                REDENVELOPE, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Wong,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ERIC C. WONG
------------------------------------
Eric C. Wong
Chief Financial Officer

February 8, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM 10-QSB (3-31-98) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,594,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (956,991)
<INVENTORY>                                     82,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               444,647
<PP&E>                                       1,375,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                (274,901)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,016,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,191,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,380
<OTHER-SE>                                    (956,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (968,131)
<SALES>                                      1,769,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,697,501
<CGS>                                          608,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,613,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
### §2830. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §236, formerly §237, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §5(f), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2297; renumbered §237 and amended Pub. L. 95–568, §6(d), (e), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2428, set forth authorization of appropriations.

A prior section 236 of Pub. L. 88–452, title II, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §5(f), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2297; amended Pub. L. 94–341, §2(a)(14), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 804, related to establishment of Intergovernmental Advisory Council on Community Services and was classified to section 2829 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–568, §6(d), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2428.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.