alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Millstream
Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") on the date hereof, Arthur Spector, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lynda R. Guinan, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted:

1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
     2003 (the "Periodic Report"), to which this Certification is attached as
     Exhibit 32, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company.



Dated: October 8, 2003                           /s/ Arthur Spector
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                                 /s/ Lynda R. Guinan
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       13
EXHIBIT
35.1



SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2019, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1, as Issuer, Mercedes-Benz Retail Receivables
LLC, f/k/a Daimler Retail Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer
(the “Servicing Agreement”), for the period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”).



I,
Brian T. Stevens, certify that:



| | (a) | A
                                         review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance
                                         under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
                                         obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
                                         Period.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 16, 2023







| | /s/
        Brian T. Stevens                                
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:
Brian T. Stevens

Title:
Vice President and Controller
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4091 

To assist low-income individuals in obtaining medically recommended dental 

care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2012 

Ms. DEGETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To assist low-income individuals in obtaining medically 

recommended dental care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coordination of Pro 

5 Bono Medically Recommended Dental Care Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS OR CONTRACTS TO FACILITATE LOW-IN7 COME ACCESS TO DENTAL CARE. 

8 Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

9 is amended by inserting after section 317M (42 U.S.C. 

10 247b–14a) the following new section: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4091 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 317M–1. GRANTS OR CONTRACTS TO FACILITATE 

2 LOW-INCOME ACCESS TO DENTAL CARE. 

3 ‘‘(a) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall award competi4 tive grants to, or enter into contracts with, eligible entities 

5 to maximize the number of eligible low-income individuals 

6 receiving dental care. 

7 ‘‘(b) USE OF FUNDS.—An entity shall use amounts 

8 received under a grant or contract under this section to 

9 fund the employment costs of a program to— 

10 ‘‘(1) coordinate the provision of free, medically 

11 recommended dental care to eligible low-income indi12 viduals by volunteer dentists in a manner consistent 

13 with State licensing laws; and 

14 ‘‘(2) verify the medical, dental, and financial 

15 needs of eligible low-income individuals who may be 

16 eligible for such dental services. 

17 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBILITY.— 

18 ‘‘(1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—To be eligible to re19 ceive a grant or contract under subsection (a), an 

20 entity shall— 

21 ‘‘(A) be an entity that is exempt from tax 

22 under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue 

23 Code of 1986; 

24 ‘‘(B) provide for the participation of eligi25 ble individuals in a free dental services pro26 gram; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4091 IH

1 ‘‘(C) submit to the Secretary an applica2 tion at such time, in such manner, and con3 taining such information as the Secretary may 

4 require. 

5 ‘‘(2) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—To be eligible to 

6 participate in a program described in paragraph 

7 (1)(B), an individual shall be— 

8 ‘‘(A) an adult individual entitled to bene9 fits under part A of title XVIII of the Social 

10 Security Act; 

11 ‘‘(B) an individual enrolled in part B of 

12 title XVIII of such Act; 

13 ‘‘(C) an individual enrolled in a State plan 

14 or waiver under title XIX of such Act; or 

15 ‘‘(D) an individual enrolled in a State child 

16 health plan under title XXI of such Act or 

17 under an approved waiver of such plan. 

18 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

19 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, 

20 $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2017.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-10-2015

In Re: Curtis Marshall Dixon

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University

School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of

Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Curtis Marshall Dixon" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 593.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/593
DLD-231 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 15-1358

___________

IN RE: CURTIS MARSHALL DIXON,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from 

the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. No. 2:00-cr-00146) 

District Judge: James Knoll Gardner

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

June 4, 2015

Before: FISHER, SHWARTZ and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 10, 2015)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Curtis Marshall Dixon, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, alleging extraordinary delay 

in the adjudication of his motion for a writ of error coram nobis by the United States 

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in E.D. Pa. No. 2:00-cr-00146. 

Thereafter, on March 17, 2015, the District Court denied the motion. Dixon sought a 

certificate of appealability, which the District Court also denied. Because the motion has 

been resolved by the District Court, Dixon has received the relief he sought from this 

Court, and we will dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny 

Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the 

course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit 

or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be 

dismissed as moot.”)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics).

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on Thursday, April 1, 2004, at the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), and on Friday, April 2, 2004 in the Pentagon, Washington, DC. 

The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on technology security, counterproliferation, chemical and biological defense, transformation of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, April 1, 2004, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m) and Friday, April 2, 2004, (8 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.)

# ADDRESSES:

Institute for Defense Analyses, Board Room, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia and the USD (AT&L) Conference Room (3D1019), the Pentagon, Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Lieutenant Colonel Don Culp, USAF, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201, Phone: (703) 767-5717. 

Dated: February 4, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-2753 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-275]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

49 CFR Part 192

[Docket No. RSPA-00-7666; Amendment 192-95]
RIN 2137-AD54


Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Integrity Management in High 
Consequence Areas (Gas Transmission Pipelines)

AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Research and Special Programs 
Administration (RSPA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the effective date of a final rule 
published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2003 (68 FR 69778). 
That rule requires operators to develop integrity management programs 
for gas transmission pipelines located where a leak or rupture could do 
the most harm, i.e., could impact high consequence areas (HCAs). The 
rule requires gas transmission pipeline operators to perform ongoing 
assessments of pipeline integrity, to improve data collection, 
integration and analysis, to repair and remediate the pipeline as 
necessary, and to implement preventive and mitigative actions. The 
published effective date was in error. This document corrects the 
effective date from January 14, 2004, to February 14, 2004, to meet the 
60 day requirement for Congressional review of major rules. (5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(4).)

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date for the final rule published on 
December 15, 2003, at 68 FR 69778 is corrected to read February 14, 
2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Israni by phone at (202) 366-
4571, by fax at (202) 366-4566, or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#224f4b49470c4b5150434c4b62505152430c464d560c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d4044464803445e5f4c43446d5f5e5d4c03494259034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>, regarding the subject matter of the final 
rule.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 2003.
Samuel G. Bonasso,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-275 Filed 1-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comerica Bank                                       MC 4330
                                                    5200 N. Palm Ave., Suite 320
                                                    Fresno, CA 93704



January 26, 2006


Mr. Ryan Turner
Chief Operating Officer
Pacific Ethanol, Inc.
5711 N. West Avenue
Fresno, CA 93711

Dear Ryan:

This letter sets forth the commitment from Comerica Bank ("Bank") to provide
Pacific Ethanol Madera LLC ("Borrower") with the following credit facility.

Comerica Bank has received approval from its senior management, and is pleased
to issue this Formal Commitment (the "Commitment") to provide to Borrower its
portion of the senior loan facility for the construction and term financing of
the Madera Ethanol Project, not to exceed $11,900M, or as determined by other
loan amount restrictions as detailed in Hudson United Bank's proposal and/or
commitment letter, attached hereto. Bank's commitment to provide this loan
facility is conditioned upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Hudson
United Bank Summary of Indicative Terms and Conditions dated November 28, 2005,
attached hereto, along with the modifications as detailed in the Hudson United
Bank Commitment Letter dated as of January 23, 2006, attached hereto.

The closing documentation and funding of the loan facilities contemplated by
this Commitment is subject to (i) the negotiation, execution and delivery of
documentation satisfactory in form and substance to Bank and its counsel and
(ii) no material adverse change in the financial condition of the Borrower or
the Project (as defined in the Proposal) having occurred since the date of this
letter.

If the proposed terms set forth above are acceptable to you, please so indicate
by signing and returning the original of this letter to us by no later than
January 30, 2006. If not returned by that date, this commitment shall expire and
be of no force and effect.

It is intended that all legal rights and obligations of Bank and Borrower would
be exclusively set forth in the definitive signed loan documents.




<PAGE>

On behalf of Comerica Bank, we want to thank you for the opportunity to present
this commitment to you. We look forward to establishing a long and mutually
rewarding relationship with Pacific Ethanol Madera LLC. Please do not hesitate
to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,


/s/ Robert Harlan

Robert Harlan
Vice President



ACCEPTED ON THIS 26th DAY OF January, 2006.


Pacific Ethanol Madera LLC ("Borrower")


BY: /s/ William G. Langley
-----------------------------------

TITLE: Treasurer
#### Clifford R. Graham, III, Respondent, v CSX Transportation, Inc., Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 828]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered February 2, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
§ 17.5 Financial hardship. ( a ) Waiver of overpayment will not be allowed in any case prior to receipt and evaluation of a completed Statement of Financial Status, duly sworn by the recipient of the overpayment.
( b ) Financial hardship may be deemed to exist in, but not limited to, those situations where the recipient from whom collection is sought needs substantially all of his or her current income and liquid assets to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses and liabilities. ( 1 ) *Considerations.* Some pertinent considerations in determining whether recovery would cause financial hardship are as follows: ( i ) The individual's financial ability to pay at the time collection is scheduled to be made.
( ii ) Income to other family member(s), if such member's ordinary and necessary living expenses are included in expenses reported by the individual.
( c ) *Exemptions.* Assets exempt from execution under State law should not be considered in determining an individual's ability to repay the indebtedness, rather primary emphasis shall be placed upon the individual's liquid assets and current income in making such determinations.
#### Shore Park Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondent, v James A. Seibert et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[715 NYS2d 878]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to foreclose a lien on certain real property for unpaid common charges, the defendants James A. Seibert and Barbara J. Seibert appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated August 23, 1999, which, *inter alia,*granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against them. .

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*305The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants. In support of its motion, the plaintiff sustained its initial burden by submitting proof of the lien and demonstrating the appellants’ failure to pay the common charges (see, *Rivermist Assn. v Davis,*251 AD2d 1039; *Mahopac Natl. Bank v Baisley,*244 AD2d 466, 467; *Metropolitan Distrib. Servs. v DiLascio,*176 AD2d 312). It was then incumbent upon the appellants to assert any defenses raising a question of fact as to their default on the common charges (see, *Marton Assocs. v Vitale,*172 AD2d 501, 502). The appellants’ assertion that they ceased making payments due to the plaintiffs failure to increase the size" of their boat slip was insufficient to defeat the motion (see, *Rivermist Assn. v Davis, supra; Board of Mgrs. v Baker,*244 AD2d 229; *cf., Residential Bd. of Mgrs. v Berman,*213 AD2d 206).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### § 146.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 146.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 146.500 through 146.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.
### §299c–6. Funding

#### (a) Intent

To ensure that the United States investment in biomedical research is rapidly translated into improvements in the quality of patient care, there must be a corresponding investment in research on the most effective clinical and organizational strategies for use of these findings in daily practice. The authorization levels in subsections (b) and (c) provide for a proportionate increase in health care research as the United States investment in biomedical research increases.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this subchapter, there are authorized to be appropriated $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2000, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

#### (c) Evaluations

In addition to amounts available pursuant to subsection (b) for carrying out this subchapter, there shall be made available for such purpose, from the amounts made available pursuant to section 238j of this title (relating to evaluations), an amount equal to 40 percent of the maximum amount authorized in such section 238j of this title to be made available for a fiscal year.

#### (d) Health disparities research

For the purpose of carrying out the activities under section 299a–1 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2002 through 2005.

#### (e) Patient safety and quality improvement

For the purpose of carrying out part C, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2010.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IX, §947, formerly §927, as added Pub. L. 106–129, §2(a), Dec. 6, 1999, 113 Stat. 1670; amended Pub. L. 106–525, title II, §201(b), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2507; renumbered §937 and amended Pub. L. 109–41, §2(a)(3), (b), July 29, 2005, 119 Stat. 424, 434; renumbered §947, Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3013(a)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 381.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 299c–6, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IX, §927, as added Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, §6103(c), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2204, set out definitions, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 106–129. See section 299c–7 of this title.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 109–41, §2(b), added subsec. (e).

2000—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–525 added subsec. (d).