alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2996a. Definitions

As used in this subchapter, the term—

(1) "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation;

(2) "Corporation" means the Legal Services Corporation established under this subchapter;

(3) "eligible client" means any person financially unable to afford legal assistance;

(4) "Governor" means the chief executive officer of a State;

(5) "legal assistance" means the provision of any legal services consistent with the purposes and provisions of this subchapter;

(6) "recipient" means any grantee, contractee, or recipient of financial assistance described in clause (A) of section 2996e(a)(1) of this title;

(7) "staff attorney" means an attorney who receives more than one-half of his annual professional income from a recipient organized solely for the provision of legal assistance to eligible clients under this subchapter; and

(8) "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title X, §1002, as added Pub. L. 93–355, §2, July 25, 1974, 88 Stat. 378.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. Ford, Chief
Financial Officer of Kroll Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kroll Inc. /s/ Steven L. Ford

Steven L. Ford
Chief Financial Officer
 Date: June 25, 2004 38
KS/MOATT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN M. SCHILLING; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Respondents,

 v.

TRANSCOR AMERICA, LLC; et al.,

 Defendants - Petitioners.

No. 10-80055

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00941-SI

Northern District of California, 

San Francisco

ORDER

Before: FISHER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners’ petition for rehearing en banc, received on May 4, 2010, is

deemed filed and is construed as a motion to reconsider en banc the court’s April

14, 2010 order. So construed, the motion is denied on behalf of the court. See 9th

Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11.

No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case.

FILED

JUL 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 10-80055 07/08/2010 Page: 1 of 1 ID: 7397632 DktEntry: 6 Case 3:08-cv-00941-SI Document 121 Filed 07/20/10 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Cler k of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

___________________________ ______________ Clerk September 26, 2012

d0919 

# Order

September 26, 2012

144925

LAURIE MARBLE,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 144925

COA: 305853

Ingham CC: 11

- 000218

- AA

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the ap plication for leave to appeal the February 29, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

M.D. MODZELEWSKI, R.Q. WARD, J.P. LISIECKI

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MARCUS M. EALEY

CORPORAL (E

- 4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 20130 0415

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 26 July 2013.

**Military Judge:** Col Howard Russell, USMCR.

**Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, Marine Aircraft

Group 11, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing, Marine Corps Air Station

Miramar, San Diego, CA

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation:**  LtCol K.C. Harris,

USMC

. **For Appellant:** Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

**31 January 2014** 

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**---------------------- -----------------------------** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 86 6(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Joseph W. Plater, Appellant, v Edmund J. Hoffmann, Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 433]

Crew III, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (O’Brien, III, J.), entered December 8, 1999 in Cortland County, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

In January 1995, defendant was assigned to represent plaintiff in a criminal action in which plaintiff ultimately was indicted and charged with assault in the second degree (two *647counts) and burglary in the first degree. Following a jury trial, plaintiff was convicted on all counts and sentenced accordingly. This Court subsequently affirmed plaintiff’s conviction in January 1997 *(People v Plater,*235 AD2d 597, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1039).

Thereafter, in September 1999, plaintiff commenced this action for legal malpractice alleging that defendant had not properly represented his interests during the course of the underlying criminal action. Following joinder of issue, plaintiff moved for summary judgment and defendant cross-moved for similar relief. Supreme Court denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s cross motion, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. The case law makes clear that no cause of action for legal malpractice stemming from negligent representation in a criminal action will lie where, as here, the determination of the client’s guilt remains undisturbed *(see, Carmel v Lunney,*70 NY2d 169, 171; *Matter of Swain v County of Albany,*268 AD2d 747, 748, *lv denied*94 NY2d 764; *King v Albany County Pub. Defender’s Off.,*255 AD2d 770, 770-771, *lv denied*93 NY2d 801; *Pfeiffer v Hoffman,*251 AD2d 94). Stated another way, plaintiff’s failure to successfully challenge his criminal conviction precludes him from pleading and proving his innocence; he has, therefore, failed to state a cause of action for legal malpractice against defendant *(see, Gill v Blau,*234 AD2d 506, 507; *Doyle v Ruskin,*230 AD2d 888, *appeal dismissed*90 NY2d 883). Plaintiff’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
#### § 38.602 General financial integrity.

A designated contract market must provide for the financial integrity of its transactions by establishing and maintaining appropriate minimum financial standards for its members and non-intermediated market participants.
### §256c. Bulk purchases of vaccines for certain programs

#### (a) Agreements for purchases

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after October 27, 1992, the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and in consultation with the Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, shall enter into negotiations with manufacturers of vaccines for the purpose of establishing and maintaining agreements under which entities described in paragraph (2) may purchase vaccines from the manufacturers at the prices specified in the agreements.

#### (2) Relevant entities

The entities referred to in paragraph (1) are entities that provide immunizations against vaccine-preventable diseases with assistance provided under section 254b of this title.

#### (b) Negotiation of prices

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, ensure that the prices provided for in agreements under such subsection are comparable to the prices provided for in agreements negotiated by the Secretary on behalf of grantees under section 247b(j)(1) of this title.

#### (c) Authority of Secretary

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary, in the discretion of the Secretary, may enter into the agreements described in such subsection (and may decline to enter into such agreements), may modify such agreements, may extend such agreements, and may terminate such agreements.

#### (d) Rule of construction

This section may not be construed as requiring any State to reduce or terminate the supply of vaccines provided by the State to any of the entities described in subsection (a)(2).

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §340C, formerly §340B, as added Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §305, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3494; renumbered §340C, Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2008(i)(2)(A)(ii), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 213; amended Pub. L. 104–299, §4(a)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3645.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 104–299 substituted "with assistance provided under section 254b of this title" for "under the programs established in sections 254b, 254c, 256, and 256a of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–299 effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 5 of Pub. L. 104–299, as amended, set out as a note under section 233 of this title.
### §274i–3. Medals not treated as valuable consideration

A medal under this part shall not be treated as valuable consideration for purposes of section 274e(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 110–413, §5, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4340.)
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear at 68 FR 51358, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 141.11 Effect on other regulations; forms and instructions. Nothing in this part shall be deemed to supersede: Executive Orders 10925 and 11114 and regulations issued thereunder, or any other regulations or instructions, insofar as such regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this regulation is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground. ( a ) *Forms and instructions.* Each responsible Department official shall issue, and promptly make available to interested persons, forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part as applied to programs to which this part applies and for which he is responsible.
( b ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Secretary may, from time to time, assign to officials of the Department, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such department or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Act and this part including the achievement of effectiveness coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of title VI and this part to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this subsection shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the responsible official of this Department.
[22 FR 10882, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 38 FR 19748, July 5, 1973]
#### § 1510.102 Application.

This regulation (§§ 1510.101-1510.170) applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
#### § 1600.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
### §300d–51. Residency training programs in emergency medicine

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may make grants to public and nonprofit private entities for the purpose of planning and developing approved residency training programs in emergency medicine.

#### (b) Identification and referral of domestic violence

The Secretary may make a grant under subsection (a) only if the applicant involved agrees that the training programs under subsection (a) will provide education and training in identifying and referring cases of domestic violence.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $400,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 though 2012.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XII, §1251, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title III, §304, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2084; amended Pub. L. 110–23, §13, May 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 98.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–23 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to residency training programs in emergency medicine and authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1993 through 1995.
§ 275.203-2 Withdrawal from investment adviser registration. ( a ) *Form ADV-W.* You must file Form ADV-W (17 CFR 279.2) to withdraw from investment adviser registration with the Commission (or to withdraw a pending registration application).
( b ) *Electronic filing.* Once you have filed your Form ADV (17 CFR 279.1) (or any amendments to Form ADV) electronically with the Investment Adviser Registration Depository (IARD), any Form ADV-W you file must be filed with the IARD, unless you have received a hardship exemption under § 275.203-3.
( c ) *Effective date—upon filing.* Each Form ADV-W filed under this section is effective upon acceptance by the IARD, provided however that your investment adviser registration will continue for a period of sixty days after acceptance solely for the purpose of commencing a proceeding under section 203(e) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(e)).
( d ) *Filing fees.* You do not have to pay a fee to file Form ADV-W through the IARD.
( e ) *Form ADV-W is a report.* Each Form ADV-W required to be filed under this section is a “report” within the meaning of sections 204 and 207 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-4 and 80b-7).
[65 FR 57449, Sept. 22, 2000]
###### Editorial Note on Part 218

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 218 appear at 68 FR 51363, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 218.21 General responsibilities.

Each agency recipient has primary responsibility to ensure that its programs or activities are in compliance with the Act, the government-wide regulations, and these regulations.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00833

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.G. AND Z.A.G., CHILDREN

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017FLI001815 C3 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant, indigent and proceeding pro se, has filed a second motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief in which he states that the clerk’s record “ is currently i n complete . . . since the (CR) filed goes up to the date of May 6, 2019 Ex. A but the trial court summary/docket sheet goes to June 19, 2019 Ex. B.” The original clerk’s record was filed in this

court on May 9, 2019 . Thereafter, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed on June 11, 2019,

which contain s the trial court’s “Order Granting Special Appearance by Webb County and Ponce Trevino, Setting Aside Default Judgment Against Ponce Trevino and Disposing of Motions Filed by Abelardo G. Gonzalez” signed on June 4, 201 9. A second supplemental clerk’s record was filed on June 20, 2019, which contains the trial court’s “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

Law” signed on June 18, 2019

. Therefore, the clerk’s record filed in this court is complete. The

clerk of this cour t is instructed to send appellant a copy of the two supplemental clerk’s records for use in preparation of the appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is

GRANTED. The appellant’s brief is due on O ctober 25 , 2019 , with no further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of September, 2019

.___________________________________ L uz E strada

, Chief Deputy Clerk
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 422 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure 

that schools have physical education programs that meet minimum requirements for physical education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2011 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to ensure that schools have physical education 

programs that meet minimum requirements for physical 

education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Physical Edu5 cation to Create a Healthier Nation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart 1 of part A of title I of 

8 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 422 IH

1 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 1120C. PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the beginning of 

5 the first school year beginning after the date of enactment 

6 of the Physical Education to Create a Healthier Nation 

7 Act, each local educational agency receiving assistance 

8 under this part shall ensure that each school served by 

9 the agency has a physical education program that provides 

10 for all students— 

11 ‘‘(1) except as provided in paragraph (2)— 

12 ‘‘(A) in the case of an elementary school, 

13 150 minutes of physical education per week; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(B) in the case of a middle school or high 

16 school, 225 minutes of physical education per 

17 week; and 

18 ‘‘(2) in the case of students with disabilities 

19 that impair their ability to participate in physical 

20 education, such physical education as is determined 

21 appropriate under the individualized education pro22 grams of such students (as defined in section 

23 602(14) of the Individuals with Disabilities Edu24 cation Act). 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 422 IH

1 ‘‘(b) STATE PLAN.—As part of the plan described in 

2 section 1111, each State educational agency receiving as3 sistance under this part shall develop a plan to ensure that 

4 all schools within the State have a physical education pro5 gram that meets the requirements under subsection (a). 

6 ‘‘(c) LOCAL PLAN.—As part of the plan described in 

7 section 1112, each local educational agency receiving as8 sistance under this part shall develop a plan to ensure that 

9 all schools served by the local educational agency have a 

10 physical education program that meets the requirements 

11 under subsection (a).’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con13 tents in section 2 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu14 cation Act of 1965 is amended by inserting after the item 

15 relating to section 1120B the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 1120C. Physical education.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
§ 138.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
### §296d. Preference

In awarding grants or contracts under this subchapter, the Secretary shall give preference to applicants with projects that will substantially benefit rural or underserved populations, or help meet public health nursing needs in State or local health departments.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §805, as added Pub. L. 105–392, title I, §123(4), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3565.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 296d, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §805, formerly §809, as added Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–158, §2(c), 85 Stat. 465; renumbered §805 and amended July 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §§902(d), 910(b)(1)(A), (B)(i), (2), (c), 911(b), 941(d), 89 Stat. 355, 356, 364; Sept. 29, 1979, Pub. L. 96–76, title I, §103, 93 Stat. 579, related to applications, amounts, etc., for loan guarantees and interest subsidies for construction of training facilities by nonprofit nursing schools, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–92, §§9(a)(1), 10(a), Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 400, 402, effective Oct. 1, 1985.

Another prior section 296d, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VIII, §805, as added Sept. 4, 1964, Pub. L. 88–581, §2, 78 Stat. 912; amended Aug. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–490, title II, §§211, 215, 82 Stat. 780, 783; Nov. 18, 1971, Pub. L. 92–158, §3(b), 85 Stat. 469, relating to special project grants and contracts for nurse training programs, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–63, title IX, §922, July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 359, eff. July 1, 1975.
#### § 1003.8 Exemptions.

No Inter-American Foundation records system or systems as such are exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a as permitted under certain conditions by 5 U.S.C. 552a (j) and (k).
### §242t. CDC surveillance and data collection for child, youth, and adult trauma

#### (a) Data collection

The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (referred to in this section as the "Director") may, in cooperation with the States, collect and report data on adverse childhood experiences through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, and other relevant public health surveys or questionnaires.

#### (b) Timing

The collection of data under subsection (a) may occur biennially.

#### (c) Data from rural areas

The Director shall encourage each State that participates in collecting and reporting data under subsection (a) to collect and report data from rural areas within such State, in order to generate a statistically reliable representation of such areas.

#### (d) Data from tribal areas

The Director may, in cooperation with Indian Tribes (as defined in section 5304 of title 25) and pursuant to a written request from an Indian Tribe, provide technical assistance to such Indian Tribe to collect and report data on adverse childhood experiences through the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, or another relevant public health survey or questionnaire.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 115–271, title VII, §7131, Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Substance Use–Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act, also known as the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.