alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CDAT Submission results for Bentonite, acid-leached 

###  Chemical/Generic Name: Bentonite, acid-leached – (5 submissions) 

###  CAS Number: 70131-50-9 

###  Company: BASF CORP 

###  Site: BASF CATALYSTS LLC, 600 EAST MCDOWELL ROAD, JACKSON, MS, 39204-5992 

###  Manufactured: CBI 

###  Imported: No Data Reported 

###  Is the chemical never physically at the import site? : N/A 

###  Volume used on the site : CBI 

###  Past Production Volume : CBI 

###  National Production Volume for Chemical : 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 lb/yr 

###  Chemical/Generic Name: Bentonite, acid-leached 

###  CAS Number: 70131-50-9 

###  Company: WACKER CHEMICAL CORP 

###  Site: WACKER CHEMICAL CORP, 3301 SUTTON ROAD, ADRIAN, MI, 49221-9397 

###  Manufactured: CBI 

###  Imported: CBI 

###  Is the chemical never physically at the import site? : CBI 

###  Volume used on the site : CBI 

###  Past Production Volume : CBI 

###  National Production Volume for Chemical : 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 lb/yr 

###  Chemical/Generic Name: Bentonite, acid-leached 

###  CAS Number: 70131-50-9 

###  Company: APPLETON PAPERS INC 

###  Site: APPLETON PAPERS INC APPLET ON PLAN T, 825 E WISCONSIN AVE, APPLETON, WI, 549113873 

###  Manufactured: No Data Reported

###  Imported: 158,400 lb/yr 

###  Is the chemical never physically at the import site? : NO 

###  Volume used on the site : 158,400 lb/yr 

###  Past Production Volume : 277,414 lb/yr 

###  National Production Volume for Chemical : 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 lb/yr 

###  Chemical/Generic Name: Bentonite, acid-leached 

###  CAS Number: 70131-50-9 

###  Company: SUD-CHEMIE NORTH AMERICA INC 

###  Site: SUD-CHEMIE INC., 1600 W HILL ST, LOUISVILLE, KY, 40210 

###  Manufactured: Withheld 

###  Imported: Withheld 

###  Is the chemical never physically at the import site? : YES 

###  Volume used on the site : N/A 

###  Past Production Volume : 654,000 lb/yr 

###  National Production Volume for Chemical : 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 lb/yr 

###  Chemical/Generic Name: Bentonite, acid-leached 

###  CAS Number: 70131-50-9 

###  Company: AMCOL INTERNATIONAL 

###  Site: AMCOL INTERNATIONAL, 2870 FORBS AVE, HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL, 60192 

###  Manufactured: Withheld 

###  Imported: Withheld 

###  Is the chemical never physically at the import site? : YES 

###  Volume used on the site : N/A 

###  Past Production Volume : 0 lb/yr 

###  National Production Volume for Chemical : 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 lb/yr
§ 50.3 Notice to the public. ( a ) In addition to its obligations under § 39.21(c)(1), each derivatives clearing organization shall make publicly available on its Web site a list of all swaps that it will accept for clearing and identify which swaps on the list are required to be cleared under section 2(h)(1) of the Act and this part.
( b ) The Commission shall maintain a current list of all swaps that are required to be cleared and all derivatives clearing organizations that are eligible to clear such swaps on its Web site.
§ 1006.885 May the debarring official extend a debarment? ( a ) Yes, the debarring official may extend a debarment for an additional period, if that official determines that an extension is necessary to protect the public interest.
( b ) However, the debarring official may not extend a debarment solely on the basis of the facts and circumstances upon which the initial debarment action was based.
( c ) If the debarring official decides that a debarment for an additional period is necessary, the debarring official must follow the applicable procedures in this subpart, and subpart F of this part, to extend the debarment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 71851)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (“NCCLS”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA. (On January 1, 2005 the organization's name will become: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). The nature and scope of NCCLS's standards development activities are: to improve the quality of work performed by organizations concerned with health care services, medical testing, and clinical and other laboratory services. Examples include training verification; safety of healthcare workers; preanalytic specimen collection and handling; evaluation of analytical methods and devices; analytic procedures in clinical chemistry and toxicology, hematology, immunology and ligand assay, microbiology, and molecular methods; performance goals for internal quality control; point of service testing in acute and chronic care facilities; physician's office laboratory testing; cytologic specimen collection and cytoprepatory techniques; laboratory design; laboratory automation and informatics; and emergency response procedures.

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27068  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 138.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 138.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
§ 1507.9 Judicial review. Any person may file a complaint against the Foundation in the appropriate U.S. district court, as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552a(g), whenever the Foundation: ( a ) Makes a determination not to amend an individual's record in accordance with his or her request, or fails to make such review in conformity with that section; or
( b ) Refuses to comply with an individual's request; or
( c ) Fails to maintain any record concerning an individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is necessary to assure fairness in any determination relating to the qualifications, character, rights or opportunities of, or benefits to the individual that may be made on the basis of such record, and consequently a determination is made which is adverse to the individual; or
( d ) Fails to comply with any other provision of 5 U.S.C. 552a, or any Foundation regulation promulgated thereunder, in any such a way as to have an adverse effect on an individual.
§ 44.03 Reporting transition swaps to a swap data repository or to the Commission. ( a ) A counterparty to a post-enactment pre-effective swap transaction shall: ( 1 ) As required by the reporting rules required to be adopted pursuant to Section 2(h)(5)(B) of the Commodity Exchange Act, report data related to a transition swap to a registered swap data repository or the Commission by the compliance date established in such reporting rules or within 60 days after an appropriate swap data repository becomes registered with the Commission and commences operations to receive and maintain data related to such swap, whichever occurs first, the following information with respect to the swap transaction: ( i ) A copy of the transaction confirmation, in electronic form if available, or in written form if there is no electronic copy;
( ii ) The time, if available, that the transaction was executed; and
( 2 ) Report to the Commission on request, in the form and manner prescribed by the Commission, any information relating to the swap transaction. Note to paragraph ( a
).
In order to comply with the reporting requirements contained in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, each counterparty to a post-enactment pre-effective swap transaction that may be required to report such transaction should retain, in its existing format, all information and documents, to the extent and in such form as they exist on the effective date of this section, relating to: the terms of a swap transaction, including but not limited to any information necessary to identify and value the transaction (e.g., underlying asset and tenor); the date and time of execution of the transaction; volume (e.g., notional or principal amount); information relevant to the price and payment for the transaction until the swap is terminated, reaches maturity or is novated; whether the transaction was accepted for clearing and, if so, the identity of such clearing organization; any modification(s) to the terms of the transaction; and the final confirmation of the transaction.
( b ) *Reporting party.* The counterparties to a swap transaction shall report the information required under paragraph (a) of this section as follows: ( 1 ) Where only one counterparty to a swap transaction is a swap dealer or a major swap participant, the swap dealer or major swap participant shall report the transaction;
( 2 ) Where one counterparty to a swap transaction is a swap dealer and the other counterparty is a major swap participant, the swap dealer shall report the transaction; and
( 3 ) Where neither counterparty to a swap transaction is a swap dealer or a major swap participant, the counterparties to the transaction shall select the counterparty who will report the transaction.
[75 FR 78896, Dec. 17, 2010]
#### § 13.2 Embezzlement.

Every consular officer who shall receive money, property, or effects belonging to a citizen of the United States and shall not within a reasonable time after demand made upon him or her by the Secretary of State or by such citizen, his or her executor, administrator, or legal representative, account for and pay over all moneys, property, and effects, less his or her lawful fees, due to such citizen, shall be deemed guilty of embezzlement, and shall be punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years, and by a fine of not more than $2,000 (22 U.S.C. 4217). Penalties of imprisonment and fine are also prescribed for embezzlement in connection with the acceptance, without execution of a prescribed form of bond, of appointment from any foreign state as administrator, guardian, or to any other office of trust for the settlement or conservation of estates of deceased persons or of their heirs or of persons under legal disabilities (22 U.S.C. 4198 and 4199). Acceptance of such appointments is not ordinarily permitted under existing regulations. See § 92.81 of this chapter.

[22 FR 10789, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 49 FR 16989, Apr. 23, 1984; 79 FR 43247, July 25, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-19329; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-58]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Imperial, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule, confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Imperial, NE.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 26, 2004 
(69 FR 62402). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 30, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-27221 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### §§ 1701.171-1701.999 [Reserved]
### §§14713 to 14715. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 14713, Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §105, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2852, related to acquisition of space science data. See section 50113 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 14714, Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §106, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2853, related to administration of commercial space centers. See section 50114 of Title 51.

Section 14715, Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §107, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2853, related to sources of Earth Science data. Subsecs. (a), (b), (d), and (e) were repealed and reenacted as subsecs. (a), (b), (c) and (d) of section 50115 of Title 51. Subsec (c), which required the Administrator to submit certain study results to Congress within six months after Oct. 28, 1998, was repealed as obsolete.
Editorial Note on Part 49
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

§ 49.18 Confidentiality arrangement. ( a ) *Confidentiality arrangement required prior to disclosure of swap data by a swap data repository to an appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator.* Prior to a swap data repository providing access to swap data to any appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator, each as defined in § 49.17(b), the swap data repository shall receive from such appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator, pursuant to Section 21(d) of the Act, an executed confidentiality arrangement between the Commission and the appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator, as applicable, in the form set forth in appendix B to this part 49 or, in the Commission's discretion as set forth in § 49.17(d)(6), in a different form, provided that such confidentiality arrangement contains the elements required in paragraph (b) of this section. Such confidentiality arrangement must include, either as Exhibit A to the form set forth in appendix B of this part or similarly appended, a description of the appropriate domestic regulator's or appropriate foreign regulator's jurisdiction. Once a swap data repository is notified, in writing, that a confidentiality arrangement received from an appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator no longer is in effect, the swap data repository shall not provide access to swap data to such appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator.
( b ) *Elements of confidentiality arrangement.* The confidentiality arrangement required pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall, at a minimum, include all elements included in the form of confidentiality arrangement set forth in appendix B of this part.
( c ) *Reporting failures to fulfill the terms of a confidentiality arrangement.* A swap data repository shall immediately report to the Commission any known failure to fulfill the terms of a confidentiality arrangement that it receives pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Failures to fulfill the terms of the confidentiality arrangement.* The Commission may, if an appropriate domestic regulator or appropriate foreign regulator fails to fulfill the terms of a confidentiality arrangement described in paragraph (a) of this section, direct, in writing, each swap data repository to limit, suspend or revoke such appropriate domestic regulator's or appropriate foreign regulator's access to swap data held by such swap data repository.
[83 FR 27438, June 12, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 75661, Nov. 25, 2020]
#### County Utilities, Inc., Respondent, v. Eastern Garden Center, Inc., Defendant, and Fred A. Hauck, Appellant.

In an action to recover on a series of promissory notes made and delivered by the corporate defendant and indorsed by the individual defendant Hauck, the latter appeals from the part of the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 27, 1960, made on reargument, which adheres to the original order of August 23, 1960, insofar as it granted summary judgment against him, and which makes the same determination. With respect to the corporate defendant, the motion for summary judgment was denied because it had filed a petition in bankruptcy; and no appeal was taken from such denial. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### § 1701.102 Application.

This part (§§ 1701.101-1701.170) applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 25, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00196

- CV

Michelle Bubnis, Appellant

v.

Leander Independent School District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTON, FIELD, AN D BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on December 21, 2012. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the district court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the district court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this C ourt and the court below.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1206 CA 11-00870**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

LOUIS LEONE AND ROSITA LEONE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

KYLE J. KACZMAREK, HELENE D. KACZMAREK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND KELLY M. LEONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA, LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN R. CONDREN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (DEBRA A. NORTON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered July 13, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant Kelly M. Leone for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against her.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
#### §§ 1510.152-1510.159 [Reserved]
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS VALENCIA,

Petitioner,

    vs.

ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden

Respondent.                                                                                       /

No. C-08-01144 MHP

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AJUDGED that pursuant to the court’s Memorandum and

Order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus, judgment is hereby entered in favor of

Respondent ANTHONY HEDGPETH  and against Petitioner JESUS VALENCIA in the above-

entitled action.

Date:August 24, 2010                                       MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court JudgeNorthern District of California

Case 3:08-cv-01144-MHP   Document 26   Filed 08/24/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T00:43:38-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO