alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2693 to 2697b. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–103, title III, §302(c), Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 507

Section 2693, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §403, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 90–574, title V, §502, Oct. 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 1012; Pub. L. 91–211, title I, §103, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 55; Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §102(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1325; Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §305(b), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 334, related to payments for construction, providing in: subsec. (a) for installments, payments to applicants, withholding of payments, and maximum amounts; subsec. (b) for amendment of application and revision of estimate; and subsec. (c) for use of allotments for cost of administration and limitation of amount.

Section 2694, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §404, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 298; Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §102(c), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1325; Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §305(c), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 334, related to appeals, petition, record, jurisdiction of courts of appeals, conclusiveness of findings, review by Supreme Court, and stay of administrative action. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

Section 2695, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §405, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 298; Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §102(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1325; Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §305(d), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 334, related to recovery of expenditures under certain conditions. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

Section 2696, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §406, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 299; Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §102(b), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1325; Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §305(e), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 334, related to State control of operations. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

Section 2697, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 89–105, §3, Aug. 4, 1965, 79 Stat. 429, related to records and audit. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

Section 2697a, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §409, as added Pub. L. 90–574, title III, §304, Oct. 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 1011, related to determination of amount of grants and exclusion of duplicated grants. See section 6000 et seq. of this title.

Section 2697b, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §410, as added Pub. L. 91–211, title V, §504, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 62, related to determination of poverty area.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with request to appropriations under Pub. L. 94–103, for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 1975, see section 303 of Pub. L. 94–103.
# 

# JAN’S ACCOMMODATION FACT SHEET SERIES

**Pre-Offer, Disability-Related Questions:**

**Dos and Don’ts**

```
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) limits an employer's ability to ask disability-related questions or to require medical examinations at three stages of employment: pre-job offer, post-job offer, and during employment. This publication provides information regarding the limitations on disability-related questions at the pre-offer stage. This stage includes job applications and job interviews.
```

```
**What is a disability-related question?**
```

A disability-related question is a question that is likely to elicit information about a disability. On the other hand, if there are many possible answers to a question and only some of those answers would contain disability-related information, that question is not disability-related.

**What questions can employers ask at the pre-offer stage?**

In general, employers cannot ask disability-related questions at the pre-offer stage. This means that employers cannot directly ask whether an applicant has a particular disability. It also means that employers cannot ask questions that are closely related to disability.

**Why does the ADA prohibit pre-offer disability-related questions?**

```
In the past, some employment applications and interviewers requested information about an applicant's physical and/or mental condition.  This information was often used to exclude applicants with disabilities before their ability to perform the job was even evaluated. As a result, Congress established a process within the ADA to isolate an employer's consideration of an applicant's non-medical qualifications from any consideration of the applicant's medical condition.
```

For additional information, visit Pre-employment Disability-Related Inquiries and Medical Exams (EEOC guidance) at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/preemp.html.

The following are some examples of permissible and impermissible pre-job offer questions under the ADA:

Updated 3/24/10.

This document was developed by the Job Accommodation Network, funded by a contract agreement from the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy (DOL079RP20426). The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Labor. Nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Labor.

Fact Sheet Series

Pre-Offer, Disability-Related Questions: Dos and Don’ts
exv10w6






Exhibit 10.6











95 Hayden Avenue · Lexington · MA 02421 · USA

T: 1 · 781 · 652 · 6300  F: 1 · 781 · 652
· 6100 www.vistaprint.com




	 	 	 

	To:

	 	Janet Holian
	From:

	 	Robert Keane
	Date:

	 	October 20, 2010
	RE:

	 	Amendment No. 1 to Barcelona Expatriate Agreement






We are asking you to sign this letter to confirm an amendment to the Barcelona Expatriate Agreement
dated March 11, 2010 between you and Vistaprint USA, Incorporated (the “Agreement”). By signing
below, you agree as follows:



1. The paragraph in the Agreement entitled “Housing & Additional Expense Coverage” is amended by
deleting the first sentence of such paragraph and replacing it with “The Company will compensate
you for a maximum of €70,000 per year of miscellaneous expenses associated with your
assignment for housing and related costs.”



2. Except as specifically set forth in this amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full
force and effect.




Vistaprint USA, Incorporated




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Michael Giannetto	 	 
	 	Michael Giannetto 	 	 
	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 	 	 
	 



/s/ Janet Holian 






Janet Holian
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                           SABRE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                                        MARCH 31, 2001
                                                                                                    -----------------------
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
EARNINGS:
   Earnings before taxes                                                                                     $    30,268
   Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries                                                                (7,787)
   Income from equity investees                                                                                   (4,109)
                                                                                                    -----------------------
   Earnings before taxes, minority interests and earnings from equity investees                                   18,372
   Add:  Total fixed charges (per below)                                                                          23,078
         Distributed income of equity investees                                                                     --
                                                                                                    -----------------------
      Total earnings                                                                                         $    41,450
                                                                                                    =======================
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expensed                                                                                         $    16,193
   Estimate of interest within rental expense (1)                                                                  6,885
                                                                                                    -----------------------
      Total fixed charges                                                                                    $    23,078
                                                                                                    =======================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.                                                                                  1.8
                                                                                                    =======================
</TABLE>
-----------------------
(1)   Fixed charges include the estimated interest component of rent expense
      (one-third of rent expense under operating leases).

                                       29
§ 225.123 Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals. ( a ) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.
( b ) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).
Order entered December 13, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 00141
- CV
AMBER ETTA BUMPUS , Appellant

V. BRENT WADE FITZGERALD, Appellee On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 773788 

### O RDER On August 22, 2013, after we had earlier determined appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we ordered Becky Wheeler, Official Court Reporter for the 196 th Judicial District Court, to file by September 11, 2013 ei ther the reporter’s record or written verification that appellant has not requested the reporter’s record in this case

. She responded by letter informing us that the court reporter at the time this case was heard was Kelly Bryant. Subsequently, court rep orter Michael Hurley informed us that he reported two temporary orders hearing, but was unaware appellant had been a llowed to proceed without payment of costs. These communications suggest appellant requested the record, but, to date, the record has not b een filed.Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3 (b), “[ t ] he official or deputy reporter

is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the reporter’s record if (1) a notice of appeal has been filed; (2) the appellant has reques ted that the reporter’s record be prepared; and (3) the party responsible for paying for the preparation of the reporter’s record has paid the reporter’s fee . . . or is entitled to appeal without paying the fee

. ” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(b). Accordingly, w e ORDER Becky Wheeler to obtain the record from Kelly Bryant and Michael Hurley and file it no later than January 13, 201 4 . No extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. Based on this order, we DENY as moot appellant’s December 3, 2013 “m otion for action by Fifth Court.”
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order by electronic transmission to Becky Wheeler, Official Court Reporter for the 196 th Judicial District Court, the Honorable Steve Tittle, Presiding Judge of the 1 96 th Judicial District Court, and all parties to the appeal.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
§ 122.3 Registration fees. ( a ) *Frequency of registration and fee.* A person who is required to register must do so on an annual basis by submitting a completed Statement of Registration (form DS-2032) and payment of a fee following the payment guidelines available on the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Web site at *www.pmddtc.state.gov .* For those renewing a registration, notice of the fee due for the next year's registration will be sent to the registrant of record at least 60 days prior to its expiration date.
( b ) *Expiration of registration.* A registrant must submit its request for registration renewal at least 30 days but no earlier than 60 days prior to the expiration date.
( c ) *Lapse in registration.* A registrant who fails to renew a registration and, after an intervening period, seeks to register again must pay registration fees for any part of such intervening period during which the registrant engaged in the business of manufacturing or exporting defense articles or defense services.
[58 FR 39298, July 22, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 27497, May 20, 1997; 69 FR 70889, Dec. 8, 2004; 70 FR 50959, Aug. 29, 2005; 73 FR 41259, July 18, 2008; 73 FR 55440, Sept. 25, 2008; 76 FR 45197, July 28, 2011; 78 FR 52687, Aug. 26, 2013]
C O N F I D E N T I A L
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 0968 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 6399

_____________________________ N ICHOLAS A NTHONY F A IRCLO UGH , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LO R IDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. L ondon M. Kite , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Stev en N. Gosney, Assistant Publi c Defender , Daytona Be ach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General , and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. April 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. M AKAR , H ARRIS , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### In the Matter of Thomas Reed, Appellant, v Onondaga County Court, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed on the decision at Special Term, Aloi, J. (See, also, Matter of Bush v Smith, 51 AD2d 860.) (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
§ 1506.19 May I pay my debt in installments? ( a ) Whenever feasible, USADF shall collect the total amount of a debt (including interest, penalty, and administrative cost) in one lump sum. If the debtor is financially unable to pay the debt in one lump sum, USADF may accept payment in regular installments. USADF will obtain financial statements from debtors who represent that they are unable to pay on one lump sum and independently verify such representations whenever possible. In addition, USADF will obtain a legally enforceable written agreement from the debtor that specifies all of the terms of the arrangement and contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event of a default.
( b ) The size and frequency of the installment payments will bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. To the extent possible, the installment payments will be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the debt in three years or less.
( c ) In appropriate cases, the Agency will obtain security for deferred payments. However, USADF may accept installment payments notwithstanding the refusal of the debtor to execute a written agreement or to give security.
§ 1508.145 Does this part address persons who are disqualified, as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions? Except if provided for in Subpart J of this part, this part— ( a ) Addresses disqualified persons only to— ( 1 ) Provide for their inclusion in the *EPLS;* and
( 2 ) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to check for disqualified persons before entering into covered transactions.
( b ) Does not specify the— ( 1 ) ADF transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible. Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on the language of the specific statute, Executive order, or regulation that caused the disqualification;
( 2 ) Entities to which the disqualification applies; or
( 3 ) Process that the agency uses to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion, disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a Federal agency takes.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Steven L. Ford, certify that
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three monthsended March 31, 2004 of Kroll Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   By: /s/ Steven L. Ford   Steven L. Ford Chief Financial Officer Kroll Inc.
Date: May 7, 2004
36
### §2280. Injunction proceedings

Whenever in the judgment of the Commission any person has engaged or is about to engage in any acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of any provision of this chapter, or any regulation or order issued thereunder, the Attorney General on behalf of the United States may make application to the appropriate court for an order enjoining such acts or practices, or for an order enforcing compliance with such provision, and upon a showing by the Commission that such person has engaged or is about to engage in any such acts or practices, a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or other order may be granted.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §232, formerly §230, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 959; renumbered §232, Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 1015, §6, 70 Stat. 1070; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1816(c) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         [Drew Field,, P.L. LETTERHEAD]

                                December 18, 1997
                               Board of Directors
                     Success Development International, Inc.
                           9799 Old St. Augustine Road
                           Jacksonville, Florida 32257

                                 Dear Directors:

You have requested my opinion as to the legality of the securities being
registered by Success Development International, Inc. (the Company) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), by filing a registration statement
on Form SB-2, relating to the offering of up to 500,000 shares of its common
stock a (the Shares) as described in the registration statement.

In connection with your request for my opinion, you have provided me and I have
reviewed the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, bylaws,
resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company concerning the offering,
the registration statement and such other corporate documents as I have
considered necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

Upon the basis of such examination, it is my opinion that, when the registration
statement shall have become effective under the Act, and when the payment of the
consideration therefor, the Shares will, when sold, be legally issued, fully
paid and non-assessable.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the registration
statement.


                                           Very truly yours,

                                           By ___________________________
                                              DREW FIELD

                                       68
#### Emma Lindemann and Others, as Temporary Administrators, etc., of Katherine F. Lindemann, Deceased, Respondents, v. Joseph Schuessler, Appellant, Impleaded with Johanna Von Meyer and Others, Respondents.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.