alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ella F. Jackson v. Teachers’ Retirement Board of the City of New York.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Poole, Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 39]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered July 31, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life and a $5,000 fine, unanimously affirmed.

The plea allocution of defendant’s nontestifying accomplice was properly received in evidence *(People v Thomas,*68 NY2d 194, *cert denied*480 US 948). As the court instructed the jury, the allocution was received solely to establish this accomplice’s own participation in the crime, a matter placed in issue by defendant. Nothing in the allocution was contrived as a device to implicate defendant, and the plea court’s use, in establishing the factual basis of the accomplice’s plea, of the statutory language that a “participant” caused the death of the victim did not, in context, imply that defendant was such participant *(compare, People v Blades,*93 NY2d 166, 174-175). The accomplice’s admission of his own participation was clearly against his penal interest, and the fact that the accomplice had entered into a cooperation agreement, ultimately unfulfilled, did not render his plea allocution any less reliable, as proof of his *own*guilt, than any other allocution made in connection with a favorable plea bargain *(compare, People v Thomas, supra,*at 198-199, *with People v Blades, supra,*at 175-176). The allocution’s reliability was not undermined by the accomplice’s *pro se*motion to take back his guilty plea, since the accomplice had withdrawn that motion prior to the receipt of his plea allocution in evidence at defendant’s trial, and since there is no indication that the motion had any merit. Furthermore, the plea allocution was thoroughly corroborated by other evidence admitted at defendant’s trial, including the testimony of another accomplice. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3933 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3933

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Acid Blue 324.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Acid Blue 324.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 324.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005, I, Takashi Kiyoizumi, Chief Executive Officer
of MediciNova, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediciNova, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of MediciNova, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: May 11, 2005By:

/s/ Takashi KiyoizumiTakashi Kiyoizumi, M.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 43.7 Delegation of authority. ( a ) *Authority.* The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Data or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate, the authority: ( 1 ) To publish the technical specification providing the form and manner for reporting and publicly disseminating the swap transaction and pricing data elements in appendix A of this part as described in §§ 43.3(d)(1) and 43.4(a);
( 2 ) To determine cap sizes as described in § 43.4(g) and (h);
( 3 ) To determine whether swaps fall within specific swap categories as described in § 43.6(b) and (c); and
( 4 ) To determine and publish post-initial appropriate minimum block sizes as described in § 43.6(g).
( b ) *Submission for Commission consideration.* The Director of the Division of Data may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated pursuant to this section.
( c ) *Commission reserves authority.* Nothing in this section prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
[78 FR 32940, May 31, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 75485, Nov. 25, 2020; 89 FR 71812, Sept. 4, 2024]
Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1961 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1961 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1961 Filed 08/11/10 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICHARD COLLINS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: Nos. 145

- 48 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . W R - 91,436- 01

I N R E D A

N I E L L E E H A R R I SO N , R e l at or

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A

W R I T O F M A N D A M U S C A U SE N O S. 137009 & 1369904 I N T H E 178 D I ST R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M H A R R I S C O U

N T Y

P e r c ur i am . O R D E R R e l a t or h a s f i l e d a m ot i on f or l e a v e t o f i l e a n a ppl i c a t i on f or a w ri t of m a n da m u s u n de r t h i s C ou r t ’ s

ori g i n a l j u ri s di c ti on . H e c on

t e n ds t h a t h e f i l e d a ppl i c a ti on s f or w ri t s of h a be a s c or pu s i n H a r ri s C ou n t y a n d h i s a ppl i c a ti on h a s n ot be e n pr ope r l y f or w a r de d t o t h i s C ou r t

. R e s pon de n t , t h e D i s t r i c t C l e r k of H a r ri s C ou n t y , s h a l l f or w a r d R e l a t or ’ s h a be a s a ppl i c a ti on s t o t h i s C ou r t , r e s pon d t h a t r e l a t or h a s n ot f i l e d h a be a s a ppl i c a ti on s i n H a r r i s C ou n t y , f or w a r d c opi e s of or de r s de s i g n a ti n g i s s u e s t og e t h e r w i t h c or r e s pon de n c e doc u m e n ti n g t h e da t e t h e St a t e r e c e i

v e d R e l a t or ’ s h a be a s

a ppl i c a ti on w i t h i n t h e pa s t 180 da

y s , or f or w a r d c opi e s of or de r s e s t a

bl i s h i n g n e w de a dl i n e s i n a c c or da n c e2

w i t h t h i s C ou r t ’ s e m e r g e n c y or de r s r e g

a r di n g t h e C O V I D

- 19 St a t e of D i

s a s t e r . Se e T

E X

. C O D E C R

I M

. PR O C

. a r t

. 11.0 7 , § 3 ( c ) a

n d ( d) ; T E X .R .A PP.P .73.4(

b) ( 5) ; T E X .R .A PP.P .73.5; F

i r s t E m e r ge nc y O r de r R e gar di ng t he C ov i

d- 19 St at e of D i

s as t e r , N o. 20- 9042 ( T e x . M a r . 13, 2020) ; N o. 20- 007 ( T e x . C ri m . A pp. M a r . 13, 2020) ; Thi

r d E m e r ge nc y O r de r R e gar di ng t he C ov i

d- 19 D i s as t e r , N o. 20- 9044 ( T e x . M a

r . 19, 2020) ; N o. 20- 008 ( T e x . C ri m . A pp. M a r . 19, 2020) ; E i

ght e e nt h E m e r

ge nc y O r de r R e l at i ng t o t he C ov i

d- 19 D i s as t e r , N o. 20- 9080 ( T e x . J u n . 29, 2020)

. T h i s m ot i on f or l e a v e to f i l e w i l l be h e l d. R e s pon de n t s h a l l c om pl y w i t h t h i s or de r w i t h i n t h i r t y da y s f r om t h e da t e of t h i s or de r .

Fi l e d: Sept e m be r 16, 2020 D o n ot pu bl i s h
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|August 5, 2005                                                  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### §1973o. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973o was editorially reclassified as section 10312 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sovereign Exploration Associates
      International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
      30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Sovereign
                Exploration Associates International, Inc.
              
              
              BY:
                /s/ Robert D. Baca
              ——————————————
              Robert
                D. Baca, Chief Financial Officer
              
              November
                14, 2005
*** E.O. 12866 Review - Draft - Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During Review ***

Category

Primary 

Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate

Year 

Dollar

Discount 

Rate

Period 

Covered Notes

Benefits

NA $6,700.00 $18,000.00 2011 7% 2030

NA $7,400.00 $19,000.00 2011 3% 2030

NA NA NA NA 7% NA

NA NA NA NA 3% NA

Qualitative

Costs

$1,500 NA NA 2011 7% 2030

$1,500 NA NA 2011 3% 2030

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

Qualitative

Transfers

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

From/To From: To:

NA NA NA 7%

NA NA NA 3%

From/To From: To:

Effects

State, Local, 

and/or Tribal 

Government

Small Business

Wages

Growth

Estimates Units

Annual 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annual Quantified 

(tons)

Federal Annual 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annual 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

Annual Quantified 

Other Annual 

Monetized 

($millions/year)

For the Tier 3 vehicle-related provisions, we have identified 4 car/truck manufacturers, 8 Independent Commercial 

Importers, and 9 alternative fuel converters that qualify as small businesses. For the Tier 3 fuel-related provisions, we 

have identified 12 gasoline refiners and importers that qualify as small businesses. EPA conducted outreach to small 

entities and convened a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel to obtain advice and recommendations of representatives 

of the small entities that potentially would be subject to the Tier 3 rule’s requirements. The final rule contains a number of 

small entity flexibilities that are expected to significantly minimize the impact of the final standards on these small business

entities. EPA prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) that examines the impact of the final rule on small 

entities. The FRFA can be found in Chapter 10 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis.

This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The final standards will be implemented at the Federal level and impose compliance costs only on vehicle manufacturers 

and fuel refiners. Tribal governments would be affected only to the extent they purchase and use regulated vehicles and 

fuels. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to these rules.

Note: The range of total annual benefits in 

2030 represent a low end that includes 

premature mortality estimates based on 

Krewski et al., 2009 for PM2.5 and Bell et al., 

2004 for ozone, and an upper end that 

includes premature mortality estimates 

based on Lepeule et al., 2012 for PM2.5 and 

Levy et al., 2005 for ozone. More details 

regarding the benefits can be found in 

preamble Section VIII.

Note: More details regarding costs can be 

found in preamble Section VII.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4248 

To authorize the burial at Arlington National Cemetery of members of the 

Army who served honorably in the Tomb Guard Platoon of the 3d 

United States Infantry Regiment, which provides the sentinels at the 

Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2012 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the burial at Arlington National Cemetery of 

members of the Army who served honorably in the Tomb 

Guard Platoon of the 3d United States Infantry Regiment, which provides the sentinels at the Tomb of the 

Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4248 IH

1 SECTION 1. BURIAL OF DECEASED FORMER MEMBERS OF 

2 THE TOMB GUARD PLATOON AT ARLINGTON 

3 NATIONAL CEMETERY. 

4 Section 4722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new para6 graph: 

7 ‘‘(3) Subject to section 985(b) of this title, a person 

8 who served honorably as a member of the Army and was 

9 assigned to duty for at least nine months in the Tomb 

10 Guard Platoon of the 3d United States Infantry Regi11 ment, which provides the sentinels at the Tomb of the Un12 knowns at Arlington National Cemetery, is eligible for in13 terment or inurnment at Arlington National Cemetery.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §275. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–43, title I, §121(a), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 133

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §381, as added Nov. 20, 1985, Pub. L. 99–158, §11, 99 Stat. 883; amended Nov. 4, 1988, Pub. L. 100–607, title I, §157(a), 102 Stat. 3059, established the Biomedical Ethics Board and provided for its membership, functions, reports to Congress, etc., and provided for appointment of a Biomedical Ethics Advisory Committee to assist the Biomedical Ethics Board.

A prior section 275, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §381, formerly §371, as added Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 907, §1, 70 Stat. 960; renumbered §381, Mar. 13, 1970, Pub. L. 91–212, §10(a)(3), 84 Stat. 66, established a National Library of Medicine in the Public Health Service and stated the congressional purposes for such establishment, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–158, §3(b), Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 879.
#### § 1006.445 What action may I take if a primary tier participant knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person?

If a participant knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person, you as an agency official may refer the matter for suspension and debarment consideration. You may also disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, or take any other appropriate remedy.
#### Harry Hamborg and Carrie Hamborg, appellees, v. Henry Schrik and John Schrik, trading as Henry Schrik & Company, appellants.

Gen. No. 27,726.

Action of tort for damages for filing for record a contract which was afterward removed as a cloud on plaintiffs’ title. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Greenway, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed on remittitur.

Opinion filed November 8, 1922.

Rehearing denied November 21, 1922.

Lucius, Buehler *&*Lucius, for appellants; Ernst Buehler, of counsel. Francis F. Moran, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00071-CV

IN RE GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). The stay 

ordered by this Court on March 8, 2017 is lifted.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition Denied

Opinion delivered and filed October 25, 2017

[OT06]
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     February 10, 2014








CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)








Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)














333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000








NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





1


---







ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.


On February 10, 2014, the registrant issued a press release announcing entry into a definitive agreement to sell Continental Assurance Company, a life insurance subsidiary with structured settlement and group annuity liabilities.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 in this Form 8-K.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.


2


---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  February 10, 2014By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


3


---







EXHIBIT INDEX








Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued February 10, 2014, announcing entry into a definitive agreement to sell Continental Assurance Company.











4
§ 146.310 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment.* A recipient to which §§ 146.300 through 146.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and admission of students. A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 146.110(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 146.110(b).
( b ) *Recruitment at certain institutions.* A recipient to which §§ 146.300 through 146.310 apply shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at educational institutions, schools, or entities that admit as students only or predominantly members of one sex, if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 146.300 through 146.310.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                          (000S, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
                                                                                MARCH 31, 2000
                                                                           --------------------------
<S>                                                                        <C>
Net income                                                                 $                   3,255

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                                              8,452

Basic earnings per share                                                   $                    0.39
                                                                           =========================


Net income                                                                 $                   3,255

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                                                              8,452

Dilutive stock options                                                                            15
                                                                           -------------------------
                                                                                               8,467

Earnings per share assuming dilution                                       $                    0.38
                                                                           =========================
</TABLE>