alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1510.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
#### § 403.3 Use of customers' free credit balances.

Every registered government securities broker or dealer shall comply with the requirement of § 240.15c3-2 of this title concerning the use of customer free credit balances. For purposes of this section, all references to “broker or dealer” in § 240.15c3-2 shall include government securities brokers and dealers.
#### Consolidated Service Stations, Inc., Respondent, v. Cities Service Oil Company et al., Appellants.

Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 592.]
#### Sanford R. Cowan et al., Respondents, v. Residential Builders of Russell Gardens, Inc., Appellant.

The respective contracts did not entitle the buyers to a credit by reason of the seller’s success in acquiring title to the parcels at a cost less than $5,000 for each parcel. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See *post,*p. 792.]
#### § 1006.635 May the Inter-American Foundation settle a debarment or suspension action?

Yes, we may settle a debarment or suspension action at any time if it is in the best interest of the Federal Government.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6311

ELMER K. FLOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-00-437-3)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer K. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of

the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Elmer Floyd appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000).* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Floyd v. Baskerville, No. CA00-437-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 20.1 Definitions.

As used in this part, unless otherwise specified, the following have the meaning indicated:

*COLA* means cost-of-living adjustment in annuity.

*Creditable service* or *service* means employment or other periods that are counted under sections 816, 817, or 854 in determining retirement benefits.

*Disability annuitant* means a participant in FSRDS or FSPS entitled to a disability annuity under section 808 of the Act or subchapter V, chapter 84, title 5 U.S.C., and a *disability annuity* means a Foreign Service annuity computed under those sections.

*FSRDS* means the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability System established by subchapter I, chapter 8, of the Act.

*FSPS* means the Foreign Service Pension System established by subchapter II, chapter 8, of the Act.

*Former spouse* means a former wife or husband of a participant or former participant who was married to such participant for not less than 10 years during service of the participant which is creditable under chapter 8 of the Act with at least 5 years occurring while the employee was a member of the Foreign Service and who retired from the Foreign Service Retirement System.

*Full annuity* equals the annuity the former participant would be eligible to receive except for deductions made to provide survivor benefits or because of payment of a portion of the annuity to others.

*Participant* means a person who contributes to the Fund identified in § 20.2. Such person may participate in either FSRDS or FSPS.

*Principal* means a participant or former participant whose service forms the basis for a benefit for a former spouse under this part.

*Pro rata share,* in the case of a former spouse of a participant or former participant, means the percentage obtained by dividing the number of months during which the former spouse was married to the participant during the creditable service of the participant by the total number of months of such creditable service. In the total period, 30 days constitutes a month and any period of less than 30 days is not counted. When making this calculation for a former spouse married to a participant during a period the participant earned extra service credit under section 817 of the Act, the number of months of such extra service credit earned during that period of the marriage shall be added to the total number of months of the marriage.
Case 3:08-cv-01411-CRB Document 8 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-01411-CRB Document 8 Filed 02/05/10 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41028 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. ZEFERINO ORTEGA-ESPINOZA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-331-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Zeferino Ortega-Espinoza (Ortega) seeks to preserve for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-B ooker** rulings have effectively rei nstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker

. Ortega concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402No. 06-41028

2 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. In light of Rita v. Unite d States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007), the issue remains foreclosed. Ortega also raises arguments that are foreclosed by A lmendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB f or
      the
      three month period ending March
      31,
      2007, a s
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2007 (the “Report”), I,
      Philip M. C ohen,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Philip M.
      Cohen


Philip
      M.
      Cohen


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      17,
      2007





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### § 151.10 Minimum limits of insurance for aircraft and/or vessels.

Insurance in respect of vessels and/or aircraft shall provide limits of liability adequate in light of reasonably foreseeable risks from the ownership, maintenance, or other regular use of vessels and/or aircraft.
#### § 104.2 Sharing of information regarding international trafficking in persons.

Each Federal Department or agency represented on the Senior Policy Operating Group shall, to the extent permitted by law, share information on all matters relating to grants, grant policies, or other significant actions regarding the international trafficking in persons. In its coordinating role, the Senior Policy Operating Group shall establish appropriate mechanisms to effect such information sharing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3814 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3814

To prohibit the Department of Justice from tracking and cataloguing the 
               purchases of multiple rifles and shotguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2012

Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Akin, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
Austria, Mr. Cole, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Benishek, Mr. Franks of 
 Arizona, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Quayle, and 
 Mr. Gohmert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Department of Justice from tracking and cataloguing the 
               purchases of multiple rifles and shotguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF TRACKING OR CATALOGUING FIREARMS PURCHASES.

    For fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter, no Federal 
funds may be used to require a person licensed under section 923 of 
title 18, United States Code, to report information to the Department 
of Justice regarding the sale of multiple rifles or shotguns to the 
same person.
                                 <all>
```
### §17381. Statement of policy on modernization of electricity grid

It is the policy of the United States to support the modernization of the Nation's electricity transmission and distribution system to maintain a reliable and secure electricity infrastructure that can meet future demand growth and to achieve each of the following, which together characterize a Smart Grid:

(1) Increased use of digital information and controls technology to improve reliability, security, and efficiency of the electric grid.

(2) Dynamic optimization of grid operations and resources, with full cyber-security.

(3) Deployment and integration of distributed resources and generation, including renewable resources.

(4) Development and incorporation of demand response, demand-side resources, and energy-efficiency resources.

(5) Deployment of "smart" technologies (real-time, automated, interactive technologies that optimize the physical operation of appliances and consumer devices) for metering, communications concerning grid operations and status, and distribution automation.

(6) Integration of "smart" appliances and consumer devices.

(7) Deployment and integration of advanced electricity storage and peak-shaving technologies, including plug-in electric and hybrid electric vehicles, and thermal-storage air conditioning.

(8) Provision to consumers of timely information and control options.

(9) Development of standards for communication and interoperability of appliances and equipment connected to the electric grid, including the infrastructure serving the grid.

(10) Identification and lowering of unreasonable or unnecessary barriers to adoption of smart grid technologies, practices, and services.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title XIII, §1301, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1783.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Exhibit
32.2





Section
1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian Fontana, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ BRIAN FONTANA
              Brian
      Fontana, Vice President
                  and
      Chief Financial Officer






November
12, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 142.13 Employment criteria. ( a ) A recipient may not make use of any employment test or other selection criterion that screens out or tends to screen out handicapped persons or any class of handicapped persons unless: ( 1 ) The test score or other selection criterion, as used by the recipient, is shown to be job-related for the position in question, and
( 2 ) Alternative job-related tests or criteria that do not screen out or tend to screen out as many handicapped persons are not shown by the Secretary to be available.
( b ) A recipient shall select and administer tests concerning employment to ensure that when administered to any applicant or employee who has a handicap that impairs sensory, manual, speaking, or other skills, the test results accurately reflect the applicant's or employee's job skills, aptitude, or whatever factor the test purports to measure, rather then reflecting the applicant's impaired sensory, manual, speaking, or other skills (except where those skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Diane Bolding, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 10, 1976, convicting her of assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the facts, and indictment dismissed. The appellant’s guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Latham, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.
#### §§ 275.206(4)-(3)-275.206(4)-4 [Reserved]
### §290aa–3a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title V, §505, as added Oct. 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4004(a), 100 Stat. 3207–109, and amended, which related to advisory councils for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the National Institute of Mental Health, was renumbered section 502 of act July 1, 1944, by Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §102(1), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 331, and transferred to section 290aa–1 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Data Interchange Standards Association,                           ( print page 75346)                        Secretariat for ANSI ASC X12 (“X12”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade commission disclosing (1) the same and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the propose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Data Interchange Standards Association, Secretariat for ANSI ASC X12, Falls Church, VA. The nature and scope of X12's standards development activities are: to develop, maintain, interpret, publish and promote the proper use of electronic business interchange standards, which may be based on, but are not limited to, the Electronic Data Interchange (“EDI”) or the Extensible Markup Language (“XML”) syntaxes. Standards activities undertaken by X12 may encompass any subject area for which electronic business interchange standards can be developed. Subject areas include, but are not limited to, order processing, shipping and receiving, invoicing, payment and cash application data, transportation, product development, manufacturing, quality, marketing, and data to and from entities involved in finance, insurance, education, and state and federal governments. This includes activities leading to both American National Standards and international standards. 

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27539 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 120604A]


Marine Mammals; File No. 87-1593

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Daniel Costa, Ph.D., University of 
California, Santa Cruz, Long Marine Lab, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, 
CA 95060, has been issued an amendment to Permit No. 87-1593 conduct 
scientific research on southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina).

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sloan or Ruth Johnson, (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 15, 2004, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (69 FR 42424) that a request for a permit 
amendment to take the species identified above had been submitted by 
the above-named individual. The requested amendment has been issued 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the Regulations Governing the 
Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The permit holder is authorized to capture, sedate, tag (flipper 
and instrument), sample, and release up to 30 adult southern elephant 
seals; tag and weigh up to 50 immature elephant seals; conduct 
population censussing; and incidentally disturb up to 100 elephant 
seals during research. The purpose of this project is to examine the 
foraging behavior and habitat utilization of the southern elephant seal 
in the Western Antarctic Peninsula.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: December 8, 2004.
Stephen L. Leathery,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 04-27431 Filed 12-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
'I'O'\VN OF WEST YEI_JLOWSTONE 

MO~ 

February 27, 2013 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: EAS Carrier Selection, West Yellowstone, Montana, DOT-OST-2003-14626 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Town of West Yellowstone, Montana, supports the proposal submitted by SkyWest Airlines 

to operate as the Essential Air Service (EAS) air carrier at the Yellowstone Airport for the 2013 

and 2014 summer seasons. 

The Town has benefited from its relationship with SkyWest Airlines since 1987 and appreciates 

the reliable and vital service it provides to West Yellowstone and the surrounding area. SkyW est 

has made notable efforts in the past to work with our community by altering its flight schedule to 

better serve visitors to West Yellowstone. Sky West is a well-established airline and provides 

good connection options to many cities in the country. 

The Town appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposal and for your consideration 

when making a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary. 

Sincerely, 

~Jv~ 

Jerry Johnson 

Mayor 

c: Debbie Alke, MDT Aeronautics Division 

P.O. Box 1570 West Yellowstone, Monta.na 59758 ( 406) 646-7795 Fax (406) 646-75! 1
### §1973aa–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973aa–6 was editorially reclassified as section 10508 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Lloyd, Also Known as Thomas Lloyd, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on May 22, 1974, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Fein, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.