alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71843-71844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureua of Land Management

[WY-100-05-1310-DB]


Notice of Meeting of the Pinedale Anticline Working Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(1976) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale 
Anticline Working Group (PAWG) will meet in Pinedale, Wyoming, for a 
business meeting. Group meetings are open to the public.

DATES: The PAWG will meet January 5, 2005, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting of the PAWG will be held in the Lovatt room of 
the Pinedale Library, 155 S. Tyler Ave., Pinedale, WY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Kruse, BLM/PAWG Liaison, Bureau 
of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, 432 E. Mills St., PO Box 
738, Pinedale, WY, 82941; 307-367-5352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pinedale Anticline Working Group (PAWG) 
was authorized and established with release of the Record of Decision 
(ROD) for the Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas Exploration and 
Development Project on July 27, 2000. The PAWG advises the BLM on the 
development and implementation of monitoring plans and adaptive 
management decisions as development of the Pinedale Anticline Natural 
Gas Field (PAPA) proceeds for the life of the field.
    After the ROD was issued, Interior determined that a Federal 
Advisory Committees Act (FACA) charter was required for this group. The 
charter was signed by Secretary of the Interior, Gale Norton, on August 
15, 2002, and renewed on August 13, 2004. An announcement of committee 
initiation and call for nominations was published

[[Page 71844]]

in the Federal Register on February 21, 2003, (68 FR 8522). PAWG 
members were appointed by Secretary Norton on May 4, 2004.
    The agenda for this meeting will include separate presentations on 
sagebrush ecology and the recently completed 5-year mule deer winter 
range study on the Mesa, task group leader discussions and individual 
task group discussions. At a minimum, public comments will be heard 
just prior to adjournment of the meeting.

    Dated: December 2, 2004.
Priscilla E. Mecham,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 04-27080 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### § 1007.2 Definitions.

For the purposes of the part, the following definitions will apply:

*Agency* means an executive agency as defined at 5 U.S.C. 105 including the U.S. Postal Service, the U.S. Postal Commission, a military department as defined at 5 U.S.C. 102, an agency or court in the judicial branch, an agency of the legislative branch including the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives and other independent establishments that are entities of the Federal government.

*Creditor Agency* means the agency to which the debt is owed.

*Debt* means an amount owed to the United States from sources which include loans insured or guaranteed by the United States and all other amounts due the United States from fees, leases, rents, royalties, services, sales of real or personal property, overpayments, penalties, damages, interests, fines, forfeitures (except those arising under the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and all other similar sources.

*Disposable pay* means the amount that remains from an employee's federal pay after the required deductions for social security, federal, state or local income tax, health insurance premiums, retirement contributions, life insurance premiums, federal employment taxes, and any other deductions that are required to be withheld by law.

*Hearing official* means an individual responsible for conducting any hearing with respect to the existence or amount of a debt claimed and who renders a decision on the basis of such hearing. A hearing official may not be under the supervision or control of the President of the Inter-American Foundation.

*Paying Agency* means the agency that employs the individual who owes the debt and authorizes the payment of his/her current pay.

*President* means the President of the Inter-American Foundation or the President's designee.

*Salary offset* means an administrative offset to collect a debt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 5514 by deduction(s) at one or more officially established pay intervals from the current pay account of an employee without his/her consent.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, William M. Greenman,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cerus Corporation; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 22, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ William M. Greenman                                            
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | William M. Greenman                                                
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Jeffrey M. Harper FAA Office of Regional Counsel 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 Todd C. Emerson SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, Utah 84790 T (435) 634-3530 T (425) 227-2161 F (425) 227-1007

In the Matters of: F(435) 634-3505 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

FAA CaseNo. 2012NM060030 DMS No. FAA-2014-0322
FAA CaseNo. 2014WP910006 DMS No. FAA-2014-0686
FAA CaseNo. 2012NM060029 DMS No. FAA-2014-0809
SkyWestAirlines, Inc. FAA CaseNo. 2012NM060123 DMS No. FAA-2014-0810
FAA Case No. 2013NM060083 DMS No. FAA-2014-0811
FAA CaseNo. 2015WP910079 DMS No. FAA-2016-4267

· Honorable Douglas M, Rawald ··



### · · Joint•Motionto StayProceedings

In accordance with 14 C.P.R. § 13.218(a), the partiesjointlybringthis Motion to Stay Proceedings.

The parties have begun negotiating a global settlement.to all pending cases involving Respondent SkyWest. Dueto the complexity ofthe issues involved, the negotiations are expected to last some time. Accordingly, the parties request the court staythe proceedings listed in the caption until the parties notifY the court'they hav'e reached a settlement or that negotiations have broken down.

### Respectfully submitted this 31" day ofMarch, 2016. Digitallysigned 

### byJEFFREY M HARPER

**---······~-Date:-20.16.03.30** 

### J. 

### M. Harper 14:10:73 -07'00' 

### Attorney for Complaman1'

Joint Motion to Stay P'roc:eedtngs In t11e Matters of SkyWest Air!i 1les. Inc. DMS Nos. FM 2014·0322, ·0686, 0809, e:l810, ·0811, FM-2016-???? Pi!ge2or3 Jeffrey M, Halve:r, FAA Attorney Federal

**Avlet~on** AdminisHatiof1 T(425)227·2161 F(425) 227-:1.007 Tc•dd C. Ernerson SKyWest A\r!Jnes, In:::., T(4.35) 634 353.0 F(43bi 634 3505

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings has been served via facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requestedthis date, to the following:
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El 1-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536
Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WIOOO Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Fax: (202) 267-1293

Dated this 31" day ofMarch, 2016.

Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings J 

## 'efferey kamb oigitallysignedby ' jefferey.kamberg@faa.gov 

## @f DN: cn=jefferey.kamberg@faa.gov 

## erg aa,gov Date; 2016.03.31 09:24:44 -07'00' 

### JeffKamberg Legal Technician Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division-WesternTeam 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, W A 98057 (425) 227-2925

In the Matters of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. DMS Nos. FAA-2014-0322, -0686, -0809, Jeffrey M. Harper, FAA Attorney Federal Aviation Administration T (425) 227-2161 -0810, -0811, FAA-2016-4267 Page 3 of3 F (425) 227-1007 Todd C. Emerson SkyWest Airlines, Inc. T (435) 634-3530 F (435) 634-3505
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto Rolando RIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41043

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 18, 2007.

Heather Harris Rattan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alberto Rolando Rios, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Alberto Rolando Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rios has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Rios’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
July 31, 2013

Mr. James Whedbee

5816 NE. Buttonwood Tree Lane

Gladstone, MO 64119

Dear Mr. Whedbee:

This is in response to your March 23, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-

0305) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration to amend part 71, Subpart E of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The petition for rulemaking requested an 

amendment to address airspace changes resulting from the closure of certain air traffic 

control towers. Specifically, you request that when tower closures are planned for a 

temporary period, the associated Class D airspace area would revert to a Class E surface area.

As stated in your petition, the FAA was preparing to close numerous air traffic control towers 

at locations across the country due to budget cuts anticipated as a result of sequestration. On 

May 1, 2013, Congress enacted the Reducing Flight Delays Act of 2013 (Pub. L. No. 113-9, 

127 Stat. 443). The Act provides the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary) with 

discretion to transfer up to $253 million from funds "available for obligation in [fiscal year 

2013] as discretionary grants-in-aid for airports pursuant to section 47117(f) of Title 49, 

United States Code" or "any other program or account of the [FAA]" to "appropriations 

accounts providing for the operations of the [FAA]," to the extent that the Secretary

determines the transfer of funds "to be necessary to prevent reduced operations and staffing 

of the [FAA] during fiscal year 2013 to ensure a safe and efficient air transportation system" 

(Pub. L. No. 113-9, § 2(a), (c), 127 Stat. 443-44). On May 10, 2013, the Secretary announced 

that he had determined that the new legislation would allow FAA to transfer sufficient funds 

to continue funding the 149 contract towers, and the towers would thus remain funded for the 

remainder of fiscal year 2013. 

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking found in 

§ 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a 

decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and
2

3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

While the issues raised in your petition may have merit, they do not address an immediate 

safety concern. Therefore, this request is denied. Your comment and reasons for a rule 

change will be considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2013-0305 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ellen Crum

Manager, Airspace and

Rules Team
1831.205-671 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 1831.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06420**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06420\06420_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06420\06420_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 06420\06420_Followup Questions.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up



### 06420\06420_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06420\06420_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06420\06420_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06420\06420_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06420\06420_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06420\06420_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06420\06420_telecon1.pdf Technical Review Correspondence x 

### 06420\06420_telecon3.pdf Technical Review Correspondence



### 06420\Certification Statement Plant ID 06420.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06420\Supplemental Documents\06420_Cover letter EPA ICR 910.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06420\Supplemental Documents\06420_WMU ICR Part A map and diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06420\Supplemental Documents\06420_WMU ICR Part D Block Diagram D1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 91 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2
20

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 91 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Moore, Appellant, v Robert J. Henderson, as Superintendent of the Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator was sentenced on February 28, 1975 to 15 years to life imprisonment. Asserting that subdivision 1 of section 803 of the Correction Law is unconstitutional insofar as it excludes prisoners whose maximum term is life imprisonment from its provisions authorizing prisoners having indeterminate sentences to time allowance for good behavior, relator instituted this habeas corpus proceeding. He asked to have the petition enter*727tained as a class action on behalf of all prisoners serving terms with a maximum of life imprisonment, and asked the court to declare such provision of the statute unconstitutional. He appeals from the judgment dismissing the writ and petition. It is acknowledged that relator has an appeal pending from his judgment of conviction; that he has not yet served his minimum sentence; and that he is not entitled to his immediate release from prison. For these reasons we do not reach the merits of his contentions, and we affirm the dismissal (see *People ex rel. Lane v Vincent,*32 NY2d 940; *People ex rel. Malinowski v Casscles,*53 AD2d 954). (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LUKE D. BRUGNARA,

Defendant. /

No. CR 14-00306 WHA

No. CR 08-00222 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE 

RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO PROCEED PRO SE

Defendant Luke D. Brugnara has recently filed several handwritten motions (No.

14–CR–306, Dkt. Nos. 653–58). One of those motions is entitled “Notification and Affirmation

of Luke Brugnara’s Pro Se Status.” After the verdict, however, defendant requested and

received the appointment of counsel for all purposes, Attorneys George Boisseau and Dena

Young, and is thus no longer proceeding in a pro se capacity (No. 14–CR–306, Dkt. No. 639). 

The recently filed motion regarding the affirmation of his pro se status, therefore, must be treated

as a fresh motion by defendant to waive his right to counsel and represent himself. In light of his

contumacious and disruptive behavior at trial, there is a question as to whether defendant should

be deemed to have forfeited his right to self representation.

By NOON ON JUNE 19, 2015, both sides are requested to submit a memorandum and

accompanying declarations addressing the issue of whether defendant’s contumacious and

disruptive behavior in representing himself should warrant a finding that he has forfeited his

right to self representation.

Case 3:08-cr-00222-WHA Document 519 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Until this issue is resolved, defendant’s pending motion to proceed pro se shall be HELD

IN ABEYANCE. Meanwhile, all other motions defendant has filed are unauthorized, as he is

currently represented by counsel, and will thus be HELD IN ABEYANCE. For the time being, all

defense motions must be submitted through defense counsel, Attorneys Boisseau and Young. 

For the purposes of the filings due on June 19, the Court would prefer all defense filings

to be made by defense counsel on defendant’s behalf. The Court, however, will permit

defendant to file his own response, if he desires, to the issue of forfeiture of his pro se status. 

This will be a one-time exception to the rule that only defense counsel may speak or make

written filings on defendant’s behalf.

Dated: June 4, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cr-00222-WHA Document 519 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 2
§ 1508.530 Where can I find the EPLS? ( a ) You may access the *EPLS* through the Internet, currently at *http://epls.arnet.gov .*
( b ) As of November 26, 2003, you may also subscribe to a printed version. However, we anticipate discontinuing the printed version. Until it is discontinued, you may obtain the printed version by purchasing a yearly subscription from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by calling the Government Printing Office Inquiry and Order Desk at (202) 783-3238.
### §§2981 to 2981c. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section 2981, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §701, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §25(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 697; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2315, set forth Congressional statement of purpose with respect to community economic development programs.

A prior section 2981, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §701, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 534; Pub. L. 89–794, title VII, §701(a), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1472; Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §109, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 722, respecting treatment of income for certain public assistance purposes, related to provisions of State plans and withholding of payments.

Section 2981a, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §702, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2315, defined "community development corporation".

Section 2981b, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §703, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2316; amended Pub. L. 95–568, §14(a), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2436, related to authorization of appropriations.

Section 2981c, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §704, as added Pub. L. 95–568, §14(b), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2436, related to establishment, etc., of advisory community investment boards, and the National Board.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel F05 Reviews.
    Date: December 16, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Joann McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, Msc 9529, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, (301) 496-5324, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96fbf5f5f9f8f8f3fcd6f8fff8f2e5b8f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0ada3a3afaeaea5aa80aea9aea4b3eeaea9a8eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27111 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>