alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.16 Monthly reporting requirements. ( a ) *Monthly activity.* Each leverage transaction merchant shall file written monthly reports with the National Futures Association in the format specified by the National Futures Association, by the tenth business day of the month following the month covered by the report and shall include the following information separately for each leverage commodity and each long and short leverage contract: ( 1 ) The total number of leverage contracts that are open as of the close of business on the last business day of the month for: ( i ) All customer accounts, and
( ii ) Separately for commercial leverage accounts.
( 2 ) The total number of leverage contracts entered into by leverage customers during the month for: ( i ) All customer accounts, and
( ii ) Separately for commercial leverage accounts.
( 3 ) The total number of leverage contracts which were repurchased or resold by the leverage transaction merchant during the month.
( 4 ) The total number of leverage contracts which were liquidated by the leverage transaction merchant during the month (*i.e.,* as a result of overdue or unanswered margin calls).
( 5 ) The total number of deliveries on leverage contracts during the month.
( 6 ) The total number of leverage contracts which were rescinded during the month.
( b ) *Prices.* The monthly report shall also show the following information separately for each leverage commodity and each long and short leverage contract: the leverage transaction merchant's last bid price offered and last ask price offered as of the close of business on each business day.
[54 FR 41082, Oct. 5, 1989]
#### § 46.7 Reporting to a single swap data repository.

All data reported for each pre-enactment or transition swap pursuant to this part 46, and all corrections of errors and omissions in previously reported data for the swap, shall be reported to the same swap data repository to which the initial data report concerning the swap is made (or to its successor in the event that it ceases to operate, as provided in part 49 of this chapter).
#### § 1506.35 Will USADF execute a release after full payment of a compromised amount?

Upon receipt of a payment in full or a compromised amount of a claim, USADF will prepare and execute a release.
Exhibit 10.33


 


2006 Base Salaries for Named
Executive Officers


 


	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  
	
  James M. Gower

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
  Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  455,000

  	
   

  
	
  Donald G. Payan

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President and Scientific Officer and Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  395,000

  	
   

  
	
  Elliot B. Grossbard

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President, Medical Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  365,200

  	
   

  
	
  Raul R. Rodriguez

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  355,000

  	
   

  
	
  Dolly A. Vance

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  General Counsel and Vice President of Intellectual
  Property

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  335,000
§ 50.51 Cooperatives exempt from the clearing requirement. *Exemption for cooperatives.* Exempt cooperatives may elect not to clear certain swaps identified in paragraph (b) of this section that are otherwise subject to the clearing requirement of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act if the following requirements are satisfied. ( a ) For the purposes of this paragraph, an *exempt cooperative* means a cooperative: ( 1 ) Formed and existing pursuant to Federal or state law as a cooperative;
( 2 ) That is a “financial entity,” as defined in section 2(h)(7)(C)(i) of the Act, solely because of section 2(h)(7)(C)(i)(VIII) of the Act; and
( 3 ) Each member of which is not a “financial entity,” as defined in section 2(h)(7)(C)(i) of the Act, or if any member is a financial entity solely because of section 2(h)(7)(C)(i)(VIII) of the Act, such member is: ( i ) Exempt from the definition of “financial entity” pursuant to § 50.53; or
( ii ) A cooperative formed under Federal or state law as a cooperative and each member thereof is either not a “financial entity,” as defined in section 2(h)(7)(C)(i) of the Act, or is exempt from the definition of “financial entity” pursuant to § 50.53.
( b ) An exempt cooperative may elect not to clear a swap that is subject to the clearing requirement of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act if the swap: ( 1 ) Is entered into with a member of the exempt cooperative in connection with originating loan or loans for the member, which means the requirements of paragraphs (5)(i), (ii), and (iii) of the definition of *swap dealer* in § 1.3 of this chapter are satisfied; *provided that,* for this purpose, the term “insured depository institution” as used in those paragraphs is replaced with the term “exempt cooperative” and the word “customer” is replaced with the word “member”; or
( 2 ) Hedges or mitigates commercial risk, in accordance with § 50.50(c), related to loans to members or arising from a swap or swaps that meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) An exempt cooperative that elects the exemption provided in this section shall comply with the requirements of § 50.50(b). For this purpose, the exempt cooperative shall be the “electing counterparty,” as such term is used in § 50.50(b), and for purposes of § 50.50(b)(1)(iii)(A), the reporting counterparty, as determined pursuant to § 45.8, shall report that an exemption is being elected in accordance with this section.
[78 FR 52307, Aug. 22, 2013, as amended at 83 FR 7997, Feb. 23, 2018; 85 FR 76448, Nov. 30, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Jeffrey B. Pyatt, Chief Executive Officer
of Broadmark Realty Capital Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the
 “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | March 16,
                                         2020
|----- | -------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Jeffrey B. Pyatt |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Jeffrey B. Pyatt       
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
(May 9, 1962)

#### Paula F. *Raffa et*al., Appellants, v. Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Cairo, Durham, Athens, Catskill, Coxsackie and Greenville, County of Greene, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury rendered at a Trial Term, Supreme Court, Greene County, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict. Plaintiff paid admission to attend a public basketball game in the school premises owned by the defendant school district and after the game went into the school cafeteria where she bought some food. While seated at a table, the chair gave way and collapsed and she was thrown to the floor, sustaining a herniated intervertebral disc and some injuries to the muscles. Since the chair was in the full control of the defendant and furnished to the plaintiff as a business invitee on the premises, a prima facie showing of negligence was made out when it was shown that the chair collapsed in ordinary use by the plaintiff *(Reinzi*v. *Tilyou,*252 N. Y. 97; *Goodacre*v. *Roovers Bros.,*254 App. Div. 764; *Lusk*v. *Peck,*132 App. Div. 426). Although a question of fact arose as to whether or not there should be a recovery, and the case was properly submitted to the jury, the verdict for defendant is against the weight of the evidence in view of the collapse of the defendant’s chair, unexplained by it, and the absence of any negligence shown in the way the plaintiff used the chair. On this issue there should, in our view of the record, be a new trial. There was, however, no basis for the motion by plaintiff for a new trial based on a purported untruthful answer by a juror on preliminary examination of the jury and on a purported statement by one of the jurors after the trial. The Judge was entirely right in denying a motion to set aside the verdict on those grounds. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. 180 Varick Street Corporation, Respondent, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [172-180 Varick St., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 191.31 Applicable family benefits. ( a ) An eligible spouse or child shall be paid (by advancement or reimbursement) for expenses incurred for subsistence, tuition, fees, supplies, books, and equipment, and other educational expenses, while attending an educational or training institution approved in accordance with procedures established by the Veterans Administration, which shall be comparable to procedures established pursuant to chapters 35 and 36 of title 38 U.S.C.
( b ) Except as provide in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section), payments shall be available under this subsection for an eligible spouse or child for education or training which occurs— ( 1 ) 90 days after the Principal is placed in a captive status, and ( i ) Through the end of any semester or quarter which begins before the date on which the Principal ceases to be in a captive status, or
( ii ) If the educational or training institution is not operated on a semester or quarter system, the earlier of the end of any course which began before such date or the end of the twelve-week period following that date.
( c ) In special circumstances and within the limitation of § 191.34, the Secretary of State may, under the criteria and procedures set forth in § 191.33, approve payments for education or training under this subsection which occurs after the date determined under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) In the event a Principal dies and the death is determined by the Secretary of State to be incident to that individual being a hostage, payments shall be available under this subsection for education or training of a spouse or child of the Principal which occurs after the date of death, up to the maximum that may be authorized under § 191.34.
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: May 5, 2006 By /s/ BRIAN FONTANA             Brian Fontana, Vice President      and Chief Financial Officer  
28
#### Joseph Leonardo GALLARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.S. WOODFORD, Director of the California Department of Corrections; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-56368.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 19, 2007.

Joseph Leonardo Gallardo, Imperial, CA, pro se.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph Leonardo Gallardo, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his right to access the courts by interfering with his receipt of legal documents. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gallardo’s access to courts claim alleging defendants failed to provide him with copies of the prison’s incoming mail logs to support his state habeas corpus petition. However, that proceeding, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim, did not challenge Gallardo’s conviction, sentence, or conditions of confinement, but rather, was an attempt to obtain a case file from his state court trial counsel which Gallardo labeled “Client-Lawyer work product.” *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 355, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (the impairment of prisoners’ capacities to litigate, other than to attack their sentences or challenge the conditions of their confinement, are “simply one of the incidental (and perfectly constitutional) consequences of conviction and incarceration”).

Gallardo’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Cuba Distilling Company v. Samuel M. Rice, Impleaded.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00695-CV

KAMAL KADI, Appellant

V.

WILLIS GROUP, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 972077)

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 10th day of February, 2015, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

Appellant, Kamal Kadi, has neither established 

indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, all the 

required fees. After being notified that this appeal was 

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It 

is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED

that the appeal be dismissed. 

The Court orders that the appellant, Kamal Kadi, pay 

all appellate costs.
The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 10, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief 

Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

December 31, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Order entered June 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00436-CV

THE JAGO TIMES GROUP PUBLICATIONS, LLC AND RAJA A. KHANZADA,

Appellants

V.

ANWER CHUGTAI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09353

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated April 29, 2019, we notified 

the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was past due and directed the Dallas 

County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has 

not been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of 

the date of this order, either (1) the clerk’s record or (2) written verification that appellant Raja 

A. Khanzada has been found not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We notify 

appellants that if we receive verification the clerk’s record has not been paid for or that 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record have not been made and that Raja A. Khanzada has 
not been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we will, without further notice, 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to: 

Felicia Pitre

Dallas County District Clerk

All parties

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
# MountainsA

Zachary M. Berman, Attorney Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Eastern Regional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434
June II, 2014
RE: Endless Mountains Air, Inc. DocketNo. FAA-2013-0848 Case No. 2012EA050008
Dear Attorney Berman, 

### SeamansAirport 727 WindsockLane Factoryville/ PA 18419

Phone: 570.945.5125 Fax: 570.945.5953 http.jjwww.seamansairport.com 

# RECEIVED J:;:; 1G2014 HEARING DOCKET

As per Judge J.E. Sullivan's order dated May 29,2014, I respectfully submitthe following list of initial disclosures inthe above referenced case. Witnesses: 1. Randy A. Palmer Pilot

- Endless Mountains Air, Inc. 63 Covell Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702 ·· Tel: 570.947.6417 Summary: Mr. Palmer was the.charter pilotfor Endless Mountains Air, Inc. who piloted the aircraft involved in the ·alleged violations. Along with Endless Mountains Air, Inc., Mr. Palmer was also charged with violating Part 135 regulations. Mr. Palmerhas first-hand knowledge ofall aspects ofthe alleged violations.

2. William J. Dobitsch, Jr. President- Endless Mountains Air, Inc. 727 Windsock Lane Factoryville, P A 18419 Tel: 570.419.6879Summary: Mr. Dobitsch is the owner ofEndless Mountains Air, Inc. and is also defending the company inthis case. Mr. Dobitschhas extensive knowledge ofthe case and of Endless Mountains Air's financial status.
Ifyouhave any questions, please feel free to contact me anytime.SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL
ORIGINAL & ONE COPY


### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 1



### Mr. Zachary M. Berman Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY



### Office ofRegional Counsel. Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699

Mr. William J. Dobitsch, Jr. Endless Mountains Air, Inc. Respondent Seamans Airport 727 Windsock Lane Factoryville, PA 18419 TEL: 570-945-5125 FAX: 570-945-5953
Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00126-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2017-FAM-61161-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant C.S., although she is exempt from payment due to her inability to pay 

costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 1, 2019
§ 124.10 Nontransfer and use assurances. ( a ) Types of agreements requiring assurances. With respect to any manufacturing license agreement or technical assistance agreement which relates to significant military equipment or classified defense articles, including classified technical data, a Nontransfer and Use Certificate (Form DSP-83) (see § 123.10 of this subchapter) signed by the applicant and the foreign party must be submitted to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. With respect to all agreements involving classified articles, including classified technical data, an authorized representative of the foreign government must sign the DSP-83 (or provide the same assurances in the form of a diplomatic note), unless the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls has granted an exception to this requirement. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls may require that a DSP-83 be provided in conjunction with an agreement that does not relate to significant military equipment or classified defense articles. The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls may also require with respect to any agreement that an appropriate authority of the foreign party's government also sign the DSP-83 (or provide the same assurances in the form of a diplomatic note).
( b ) *Timing of submission of assurances.* Submission of a Form DSP-83 and/or diplomatic note must occur as follows: ( 1 ) Agreements which have been signed by all parties before being submitted to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls may only be submitted along with any required DSP-83 and/or diplomatic note.
( 2 ) If an agreement has not been signed by all parties before being submitted, the required DSP-83 and/or diplomatic note must be submitted along with the signed agreement.
Note to paragraph ( b
):
In no case may a transfer occur before a required DSP-83 and/or diplomatic note has been submitted to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
[59 FR 29951, June 10, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 20543, Apr. 21, 2006]