alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 
30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED 
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          2,128                   2,241
<SECURITIES>                                        0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   400,417                 400,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              406,979                 402,658
<PP&E>                                      2,462,565               2,446,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,251,544               3,231,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,123,104                       0 
<BONDS>                                     1,176,674                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         0              14,833,181
<COMMON>                                    4,480,303               4,540,303
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,751,079)            (16,141,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,251,544               3,231,488
<SALES>                                             0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0                       0
<CGS>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              205,142                 339,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            248,658                 504,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (453,800)               (844,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (453,800)               (844,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                       0
<CHANGES>                                           0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (453,800)               (844,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.09)                   (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.09)                   (.16)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

April 19, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Section 3333 Exemption 14899 (Docket FAA-2015-3160)

Dear Madam or Sir:

The Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) respectfully requests an amendment to Exemption No14899 

(Docket FAA-2015-3160) to add the use of any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial 

Systems (UAS) under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA–2007–3330 at www.regulations.gov, when weighing 

less than 55 pounds.

Sincerely

Richard B. Joy

55500 DOT Road

P.O. Box 11130

Pueblo, Colorado 81001-0130

Richard B. Joy

Principal Investigator 2

Engineering Services

(719) 584-0524

e-mail: richard_joy@.aar.com
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 142.8 Notice. ( a ) A recipient shall take appropriate initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants, and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, and unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient that it does not discriminate on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 of the Act or this part. The notification shall state, where appropriate, that the recipient does not discriminate in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs or activities. The notification shall also include an identification of the responsible employee designated pursuant to § 142.7(a). A recipient shall make the initial notification required by this paragraph within 90 days of the effective date of this part. Methods of initial and continuing notification may include but are not limited to the posting of notices, publication in newspapers and magazines, placement of notices in recipients' publications, distribution of memoranda or other written communications; and with persons with impaired vision and hearing, through appropriate modes including braille, enlarged type, sign language, and telecommunication devices for the deaf.
( b ) If a recipient publishes or uses recruitment materials or publications containing general information that it makes available to participants, beneficiaries, applicants or employees, it shall include in those materials or publications a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section. A recipient may meet the requirement of the paragraph either by including appropriate inserts in existing materials and publications or by revising and reprinting the materials and publications.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51078 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. RAUL HERRERA- PI NA, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Texas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 1 9 0 7 - ALL B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Ap pea l i ng t he j udg m e nti n a c r i m i nalc as e , RaulH e r r e r a- Pi na r ai se s ar gum ent s t hatar e f or ecl osed by A l m end arez- T orre s v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 2 3 U .S . 2 2 4 , 2 3 5 ( 1 9 9 8 ), w h i ch h eld th a t 8 U . S . C . § 13 2 6 (b)( 2 ) i s a p en a l ty p rov i sion a n d n ot a sep a ra te crim i n a l offen se . Un i t ed St at e s v . Pi ne daArr e l lano , 4 9 2 F .3 d 6 2 4 , 6 2 5 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 8 S . C t. 8 7 2 (20 0 8 ). The G o ve r nm e nt ’ s m o t i o n f or su m m ar y af

f i r m anc e i s G RA N TE D , a nd t he j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
### §280k–3. Updating national oral healthcare surveillance activities

#### (1) PRAMS

#### (A) In general

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall carry out activities to update and improve the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (referred to in this section as "PRAMS") as it relates to oral healthcare.

#### (B) State reports and mandatory measurements

#### (i) In general

Not later than 5 years after March 23, 2010, and every 5 years thereafter, a State shall submit to the Secretary a report concerning activities conducted within the State under PRAMS.

#### (ii) Measurements

The oral healthcare measurements developed by the Secretary for use under PRAMS shall be mandatory with respect to States for purposes of the State reports under clause (i).

#### (C) Funding

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this paragraph, such sums as may be necessary.

#### (2) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

The Secretary shall develop oral healthcare components that shall include tooth-level surveillance for inclusion in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Such components shall be updated by the Secretary at least every 6 years. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "tooth-level surveillance" means a clinical examination where an examiner looks at each dental surface, on each tooth in the mouth and as expanded by the Division of Oral Health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

#### (3) Medical Expenditures Panel Survey

The Secretary shall ensure that the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality includes the verification of dental utilization, expenditure, and coverage findings through conduct of a look-back analysis.

#### (4) National Oral Health Surveillance System

#### (A) Appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated, such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 to increase the participation of States in the National Oral Health Surveillance System from 16 States to all 50 States, territories, and District of Columbia.

#### (B) Requirements

The Secretary shall ensure that the National Oral Health Surveillance System include the measurement of early childhood caries.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title IV, §4102(d), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 552.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark T. Hilz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ MARK T. HILZMark T. HilzChief Executive Officer




July 18, 2011
#### Theodore Trust U/A Dated December 30, 1971, et al., Appellants, v Arthur J. Smadbeck et al., Respondents.

[717 NYS2d 7]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered February 4, 2000, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 623, the right of ap*68praisal is the exclusive remedy for stockholders dissenting to the terms upon which a corporation has offered its shares for sale in the context of a corporate merger, except that an action in equity is permissible to challenge fraudulent or illegal corporate activity *(Breed v Barton,*54 NY2d 82, 86-87). Thus, an action for damages alone may not be maintained by shareholders seeking redress for the terms upon which their shares were sold in a merger context *(see, id.,*at 87). Accordingly, plaintiff shareholders, having failed to comply with the explicit statutory requirements set forth in Business Corporation Law § 623, and having therefore forfeited their appraisal rights with respect to the stock formerly held by them in the Anhama Realty Corporation, the corporation whose merger with defendant Alcoma Corporation occasioned the purchase of plaintiffs’ stock on terms plaintiffs now belatedly challenge, are relegated to seeking relief in equity. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, however, does not seek relief primarily equitable in nature, but rather pleads an entitlement to an award of money damages to compensate plaintiffs for the alleged undervaluation of their stock in the context of the Anhama/Alcoma merger. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed.

We have considered plaintiffs’ other arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
### §2296b–3. Responsibility for the industry

#### (a) Continuing Secretarial responsibility

The Secretary shall have a continuing responsibility for the domestic uranium industry to encourage the use of domestic uranium. The Secretary, in fulfilling this responsibility, shall not use any supervisory authority over the Corporation. The Secretary shall report annually to the appropriate committees of Congress on action taken with respect to the domestic uranium industry, including action to promote the export of domestic uranium pursuant to subsection (b).

#### (b) Encourage export

The Department, with the cooperation of the Department of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative and other governmental organizations, shall encourage the export of domestic uranium. Within 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall develop recommendations and implement government programs to promote the export of domestic uranium.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title X, §1014, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2949.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
POWER SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION: 

UTILITY PERSPECTIVE

JISEA Annual Meeting

March 13, 2019

Jeffrey Logan
India 

(co-lead)

Denmark Finland Mexico

(co-lead)

South Africa Spain United States

(co-lead, under review)

Brazil China

BACKGROUND: 21CPP OBJECTIVES:

POWER SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION

Evolving Generation

Portfolios

Cross Cutting Issues: 

Operations, 

Transmission,

Distributed Generation 

Market Design

Coordinated Power System 

Planning, Policy, and 

Regulation

Electric Vehicles

Smart Grid, EE & 

Demand Response

Accelerating the transition to clean, efficient, 

reliable, and cost-effective power systems.
India 

(co-lead)

Denmark Finland Mexico

(co-lead)

South Africa Spain United States

(co-lead, under review)

Brazil China

BACKGROUND: FUNDERS AND SELECT TECHNICAL PARTNERS
India 

(co-lead)

Denmark Finland Mexico

(co-lead)

South Africa Spain United States

(co-lead, under review)

Brazil China

BACKGROUND: WORK STREAMS

• Annual Program of Work Includes:

• “Thought-Leadership” studies that focus on generic power 

system transformation topics across the world

• In-country technical assistance, often as part of a larger 

development assistance effort, focused on Coordinated 

Power System Planning & Operations, including technology 

innovation, policy, and regulation

• High-resolution grid integration studies often highlight 

this work.

• Information exchange, capacity building, fellowship 

programs, and other exercises to share lessons-learned and 

knowledge transfer.
India 

(co-lead)

Denmark Finland Mexico

(co-lead)

South Africa Spain United States

(co-lead, under review)

Brazil China

2019 THOUGHT-LEADERSHIP REPORT

• Set of case studies illustrating innovative offerings that utilities are providing to 

their distribution-side customers

• Diversity of global locations and sectors

• Examples from 5 continents across 7 subsectors (information display, bulk 

purchasing of RE, energy efficiency, energy access, household monitoring for 

elderly residents, EV charging, etc.)

• Conducted with assistance from Edison Electric Institute

• To be released at the upcoming CEM 10 meetings in Vancouver (May)
Source: State of the Electric Utility 2019
JISEA—Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis 7

Thank you

This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, managed and 

operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 

under contract No. DE-AC36-08G029308. Funding provided by the Joint Institute for Strategic 

Energy Analysis (JISEA). The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the 

views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by 

accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a 

nonexclusive, paid-up, Irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published 

form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

NREL/PR-6A50-73693
### §19105. Assistant Director

#### (a) In general

The Director shall appoint an Assistant Director responsible for the management of the Directorate established under this part, in the same manner as other Assistant Directors of the Foundation are appointed.

#### (b) Qualifications

The Assistant Director shall be an individual, who by reason of professional background and experience, is specially qualified to—

(1) advise the Director on all matters pertaining to use-inspired and translational research, development, and commercialization at the Foundation, including partnership with the private sector and other users of Foundation funded research; and

(2) develop and implement the necessary policies and procedures to promote a culture of use-inspired and translational research within the Directorate and across the Foundation and carry out the responsibilities under subsection (c).

#### (c) Responsibilities

The responsibilities of the Assistant Director shall include—

(1) advising the Director on all matters pertaining to use-inspired and translational research and development activities at the Foundation, including effective practices for convergence research, and the potential impact of Foundation research on United States societal, national and geostrategic challenges;

(2) identifying opportunities for and facilitating coordination and collaboration, where appropriate, on use-inspired and translational research, development, adoption, and commercialization—

(A) among the offices, directorates, and divisions within the Foundation; and

(B) between the Foundation and stakeholders in academia, the private sector, including non-profit entities, labor organizations, Federal or State agencies, and international entities, as appropriate;

(3) ensuring that the activities carried out under this part do not substantially and unnecessarily duplicate activities supported by other parts of the Foundation or other relevant Federal agencies;

(4) approving all new programs within the Directorate;

(5) developing and testing diverse merit-review models and mechanisms for selecting and providing awards for use-inspired and translational research and development at different scales, from individual investigator awards to large multi-institution collaborations;

(6) assessing the success of programs;

(7) administering awards to achieve the purposes described in section 19102 of this title; and

(8) performing other such duties pertaining to the purposes in section 19102 of this title as are required by the Director.

#### (d) Relationship to the Director

The Assistant Director shall report to the Director.

#### (e) Relationship to other programs

No other directorate within the Foundation shall report to the Assistant Director.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10385, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1577.)
#### In the Matter of Kenneth J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Monroe County Attorney, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 707]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (John J. Rivoli, J.), entered July 26, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent for a *1206period of 18 months in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court’s findings that respondent committed acts that if committed by an adult would constitute the crimes of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]), criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (§ 165.40), and attempted assault in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 120.05 [6]), are supported by legally sufficient evidence and are not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally Matter of Brittanie G.,*6 AD3d 1213, 1213-1214 [2004]; *Matter of Margaret A.W.,*1 AD3d 881 [2003]; *Matter of Timothy S.,*1 AD3d 908, 908-909 [2003]). The evidence presented at the hearing on the petition established that respondent was the person who pushed or threw the victim into a fence and took the victim’s bicycle. Although both a witness to the incident and the victim described the perpetrator based solely on his height and clothing, they both were able to identify respondent in the courtroom. Moreover, the victim’s mother identified respondent as the person she observed riding her son’s bicycle approximately one hour after the incident. Respondent’s height and clothing matched that described by the victim and the witness to the incident. The victim’s mother testified that she had never seen a bicycle similar to that taken from her son and that the store from which she purchased the bicycle did not carry another one like it. After respondent was arrested and the victim’s mother retrieved the bicycle from the police, she confirmed that the bicycle belonged to her son by checking the serial number on it. We thus reject the contention of respondent that petitioner failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the perpetrator of the crimes at issue. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche and Green, JJ.