alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §285n–1. Associate Director for Prevention

#### (a) In general

There shall be in the Institute an Associate Director for Prevention who shall be responsible for the full-time coordination and promotion of the programs in the Institute concerning the prevention of alcohol abuse and alcoholism. The Associate Director shall be appointed by the Director of the Institute from individuals who because of their professional training or expertise are experts in alcohol abuse and alcoholism or the prevention of such.

#### (b) Biennial report

The Associate Director for Prevention shall prepare for inclusion in the biennial report made under section 284b 1 of this title a description of the prevention activities of the Institute, including a description of the staff and resources allocated to those activities.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §464I, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §122(c), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 284b of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §104(b)(1)(C), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3693.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1992, with provision for programs providing financial assistance, see section 801(c), (d) of Pub. L. 102–321, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 236 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2003                By: /S/ J. NELSON HAPPY
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Nelson Happy
                                           Vice Chairman, President &
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                           (Principal Executive Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)

                                       30
### §2099. Prohibitions against issuance of license

The Commission shall not license any person to transfer or deliver, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any source material if, in the opinion of the Commission, the issuance of a license to such person for such purpose would be inimical to the common defense and security or the health and safety of the public.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §69, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 934; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1805(d)(2) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
Subpart 5326.2 — MAJOR DISASTER OF

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES

Parent topic: Part 5326 - Other Socioeconomic Programs

5326.203 TRANSITION OF WORK

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MICHAEL S. GILLILAND**

 

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the “Company”)filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 (the “Report”).

 

This written statementaccompanied the Report.

 

I, Michael S. Gilliland, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Michael S. Gilliland              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael S. Gilliland                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 4, 2005                 |

 

----
(February 23, 1961)

#### In the Matter of Margie Smittle, Appellant, v. Elbert E. Smittle, Respondent.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, entered April 19, 1960, which dismissed on the merits the application of the complainant for an order of filiation.

*Per Curiam.*

This filiation proceeding was determined on section 64 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act providing that where suit is brought more than two years after the birth of the child, the complainant must establish that paternity was acknowledged either in writing or by proof that respondent furnished support. The record is clear that no sufficient proof of support was made *(Matter of “Mendes”*v. “ *Penny feather*”, 11 Misc 2d 546).

Nor does the present record reveal an unequivocal writing acknowledging paternity. However there was a writing which might have been shown to meet the test. This was a card written by respondent in reply to an attorney’s letter in which respondent states that he will take care of his obligations. At the time he was, according to the proof, indebted to the complainant for various sums of money which he had either borrowed or otherwise obtained from her. It is by no means clear what obligations are referred to or whether he deemed the support of the child an obligation. It is very possible that the attorney’s letter, to which the card was an answer, would throw a revealing light on what obligations were referred to. That letter is not in the record.

The exaggerated circumstances of this case make it proper, in the interests of justice, that every avenue be explored. Therefore the order should be reversed on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, without costs to either party.

Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Order entered on April 19, 1960, denying complainant’s application for an order of filiation and dismissing the complaint on the merits, unanimously *920reversed, on the law and on the facts and a new trial ordered, without costs to either party.
#### § 1306.19 Compromise.

MCC may attempt to effect a compromise with respect to the debt in accordance with the process and standards set forth in the FCCS, 31 CFR part 902.
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32804-32805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13224]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8759]

Call for Reviewers of the World Ocean Assessment

ACTION: Notice of a certification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State, in coordination with the 
National Ocean

[[Page 32805]]

Council, requests expert review of the draft World Ocean Assessment.
    The United Nations (UN) has embarked on a regular process for 
global reporting on, and assessment of, the state of the marine 
environment, including socioeconomic aspects, the product of which is 
called the World Ocean Assessment (WOA). The projected completion date 
for the first WOA is December 2014. Subsequent WOAs are expected to be 
generated every five years in order to document trends in the state of 
the marine environment. The WOA includes more than fifty subjects 
grouped within four main themes: marine environment and understanding 
of the ocean's role in the global integrated Earth system; food 
security and food safety; human activities that influence the ocean or 
are influenced by the ocean; and marine biological diversity. A 
scientific and technical summary will integrate content to show 
linkages through interdisciplinary subjects such as human impacts, 
ecosystem services, and habitats. More information regarding the 
evolution and methodology of the WOA can be found at 
www.worldoceanassessment.org.
    This fall, UN Member States will have an opportunity to review the 
draft WOA, which is expected to be comprised of 50 chapters 
(approximately 15 pages each) and a 70-page technical summary; the 
outline illustrates the very wide range of expertise needed for such 
review. The Department of State invites experts in relevant fields of 
expertise to participate in the U.S. Government review of the draft 
WOA. Beginning on 1 August 2014, experts may register to review the 
draft WOA at review.globalchange.gov, a Web-based review and comment 
system. Registered experts will have access to the draft WOA on 2 
September 2014 and will have until midnight 30 September 2014 to submit 
their review comments using the Web-based review and comment system. 
Detailed instructions for review and submission of comments are 
available at review.globalchange.gov.
    A Review Coordination Team comprised of Federal scientists and 
program managers will develop a consolidated U.S. Government review 
submission. Only comments received via the Web-based review and comment 
system within the comment period will be considered by the Review 
Coordination Team for inclusion in the U.S. Government review 
submission.
    This certification will be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 2, 2014.
Evan T. Bloom,
Director, Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-13224 Filed 6-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


REGIONS 


1595 Wynkoop Street 

DENVER, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

http://www.epa.gov /region08 

AUG - 1 2012 

Ref: 8P-AR 

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Rebecca K. Skiba 

Senior Counsel 

Marathon Oil Company 

5555 San Felipe 

Houston, Texas 77056 

RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of 

Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities 

Dear Ms. Skiba, 

This is to notify you that the EPA has issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in order to regulate emissions from oil and natural gas 

production facilities located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air 

quality regulations for the protection of communities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIP requires 

owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic 

compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. 

The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. 

The rule is effective with this actual notice to Marathon Oil Company for purposes of enforcement 

beginning at 5 p.m. (eastern daylight time) on August 3, 2012. We will accept comments on the 

proposed rule for 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, 

Lisa Jackson, signed the interim final rule on August 1,2012, and the agency is submitting it for 

publication in the Federal Register (FR). 
A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version of the enclosed rule 

serves as the official version for purposes of compliance until the interim final rule is published in the 

FR. Please refer to the published version in a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the 

Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/searchlhome.action) and on 

Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in Docket No. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. 

If you have any questions on the interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431. 

c;JJ{ 

Carl Daly, Director 

Air Program 

Enclosures 

2 *

Printed on Recycled Paper
### §2702. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–222, §2, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 672, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1968 and 1969.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 90–222, title IV, §401, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 728, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1967 Amendment note set out under section 2701 of this title] shall be in effect immediately upon its enactment [Dec. 23, 1967], except as provided in this section. Until June 30, 1968, the provisions of section 202 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as in effect immediately prior to the enactment of this Act [section 2782 of this title] shall apply to community action agencies in existence and funded prior to the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 1967], except that in any grant or funding agreement made with such an agency prior to June 30, 1968, adequate provision shall be made for transfer of functions, obligations, records, authority, and funds to any community action agency designated pursuant to sections 210 or 211 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended by this Act [sections 2790 or 2791 of this title]: Provided, however, That nothing in this Act shall require the termination before February 1, 1969 of an existing community action agency or any program assisted under the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 [this chapter] prior to the designation of, and provision of financial assistance to, a community action agency or other agency established under sections 210 and 211 of the Economic Opportunity Act [sections 2790 and 2791 of this title] as amended by this Act."

#### Access of GAO to Grantee's Records

Pub. L. 91–667, title III, Jan. 1, 1971, 84 Stat. 2018, provided in part that all grant agreements were to provide that the General Accounting Office would have access to the records bearing exclusively upon the Federal grant.

Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 91–204, title III, Mar. 5, 1970, 84 Stat. 46.

#### Investigation and Evaluation of Economic Opportunity Programs by the Comptroller General; Submission of Final Report by December 1, 1968

Pub. L. 90–222, title II, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 727, authorized the Comptroller General of the United States to make an investigation in sufficient depth of programs and activities financed in whole or in part by funds authorized under this section in order to determine the efficiency of the administration of such programs and activities by the Office of Economic Opportunity and by local public and private agencies carrying out such programs and activities, and the extent to which such programs and activities achieve the objectives set forth in the relevant part or title of this chapter which authorizes such programs or activities, and to transmit his final report to the Congress not later than Dec. 1, 1968 containing a detailed statement of his findings and conclusions together with such recommendations, including recommendations for additional legislation as he deemed advisable.
#### In the Matter of Lynn-Dell Estates, Inc., Respondent, v. Robert P. Slocum et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Stony Point, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the issuance of a building permit, the town officials of the Town of Stony Point appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 30, 1961, which directed that the permit be issued forthwith and which declared that “ the zoning ordinance now in effect shall not apply to prevent petitioner’s erection of the improvements in accordance with the building permit to be issued.” Order reversed on the law and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for determination after a hearing, with costs to abide the event. Triaible issues of fact are raised by the pleadings and accompanying papers. Such issues should be determined after a hearing (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1295). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Village of Skaneateles et al., Respondents, v Pat J. Bombard, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 542]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V Centra, J.), entered September 27, 2005. The judgment, among other things, declared that plaintiffs have an easement over the real property of defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present — Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### (A) Francis G. Dillon, Appellant, v. Carrie Brownell, Respondent. (B) Julia Putvin, as Administratrix, Appellant, v. Buffalo Electric et al., Respondents. (C) Thomas Brownell, Respondent, v. Steven Ladniuk, Appellant.

[In each action] Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before December 8, 1960; respondent’s brief must be filed on or before December 23, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at January 1961 Term.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

DARIN KENDRICK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 208 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark T. Hilz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




June 3, 2011
By:
/s/ MARK T. HILZMark T. HilzChief Executive Officer
SERVED: DECEMBER 30, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF MESA AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0722

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND DISMISSAL OF PROCEEDING _., ' }'_:; ·;--)

This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011SW070036) was receivedbythe Office ofHearings onDecember 19, 2013, and has been assigned to the undersigned. On December 20, 2013, Complainant's Counsel served a Withdrawal ofComplaint, stating thatthe parties had reached a settlement and withdrawing its complaint. Accordingly, pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. The FAA shall send the Judge and the FAA Hearing Docket a copy ofany compromise order orfinal order assessing civil penalty. SO ORDERED.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Annjenet Chennault, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC Federal AviationAdministration I 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 FortWorth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5071 FAX: 817-222-5092/5946**Bri~** S. Gillman, Respondent's Counsel Exec. VP & General Counsel, MesaAir Group 410 N. 44th Street, Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85008 TEL: 602-685-4000 FAX: 602-685-4350 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0722 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-