alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4350 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4350

  To ensure that certain flight, duty, and rest requirements apply to 
           all-cargo air operations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2012

 Mr. Cravaack (for himself and Mr. Bishop of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure that certain flight, duty, and rest requirements apply to 
           all-cargo air operations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Skies Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than the effective date of the covered 
final rule, the Secretary of Transportation shall take appropriate 
actions to ensure that the flight, duty, and rest requirements under 
that rule apply to all-cargo operations conducted by air carriers in 
the same manner as such requirements apply to passenger operations 
conducted by air carriers.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the term ``covered final rule'' 
means the final rule of the Department of Transportation--
            (1) published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2012 
        (77 Fed. Reg. 330 et seq.); and
            (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 
        requirements.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CLOROX COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AS
PRESENTED IN THE CLOROX COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           84135
<SECURITIES>                                      5546
<RECEIVABLES>                                   430031
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1521
<INVENTORY>                                     211913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                798700
<PP&E>                                         1122667
<DEPRECIATION>                                  526374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3029992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1225076
<BONDS>                                         316260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        110844
<OTHER-SE>                                      974391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3029992
<SALES>                                        2741270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2741270
<CGS>                                          1192534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2203189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3546)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               69702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 471925
<INCOME-TAX>                                    173965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             297960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    297960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.82
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the
manager of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. IV (the Partnership),
certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period
ended June 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Partnership. /s/ Patrick L. Beach  Patrick L. Beach
President
GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC
August 12, 2004
No: 16-072 December 2, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Finalizes Tribal Policy Statement

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today approved a final Tribal Policy Statement of 

principles to guide the agency’s government-to-government interactions with American Indian and 

Alaska Native Tribes. The agency developed this document in response to direction from the 

Commission following an increase in the number and complexity of consultations between the NRC 

and federally-recognized Tribal governments. 

The policy statement is intended to encourage and facilitate Tribal involvement in activities 

under NRC jurisdiction. It provides guidance to ensure consistency across the agency in governmentto-government relations with federally recognized Tribes. The policy statement also underscores the

NRC’s commitments to conducting outreach to Tribes and engaging in timely consultation, and to 

coordinating with other Federal agencies. The final statement reflects public comments received on a 

2014 draft that itself reflected input from stakeholders. 

The NRC will soon publish the statement in the Federal Register. That notice will also 

summarize the comments received on the draft and the NRC’s responses. The statement will also 

appear on the NRC website.
§ 1203.735-408 Review of statements and determination as to conflicts of interest. ( a ) On the basis of the Statement of Employment and Financial Interests submitted by each employee or special Government employee, or on the basis of information received from other sources, the Counselor shall determine, in the light of the duties which that employee or special Government employee is or will be performing, whether any conflicts of interest, real or apparent, are indicated. The Counselor shall make this determination based on the applicable statutes, the Executive order, and the applicable regulations of the Civil Service Commission, and of the agency.
( b ) Where the Counselor's determination in a particular case is that a conflict of interest, real or apparent, is indicated, the Counselor shall initiate informal discussions with the employee or special Government employee concerned. These discussions shall have as their objectives: ( 1 ) Providing the individual with a full opportunity to explain the conflict or appearance of conflict; and
( 2 ) Arriving at an agreement (acceptable to the Counselor, the individual and the individual's immediate superior) whereby the conflict of interest may be removed or avoided. Such an agreement may include, but is not limited to: ( i ) Changes in assigned duties;
( ii ) divestiture of the financial or employment interest creating the conflict or apparent conflict; or
( iii ) disqualification for a particular assignment.
( c ) Where an acceptable agreement cannot be obtained pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the Counselor shall present findings and recommendations to the officer designated by the agency head, who shall decide which remedy is most appropriate to remove or correct that conflict or apparent conflict. Remedial action under this paragraph may include disciplinary action, including separation for cause, or any of the actions enumerated in paragraph (b)(2) of this section and shall be effective in accordance with applicable laws, Executive orders, and regulations.
( d ) Written summaries of all agreements and decisions arrived at pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall be placed in the Counselor's files. Copies shall also be made available to the employee or special Government employee concerned.
#### Max Edelson et al., Appellants, v. Jeanette Couchman et al., Respondents.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.
§ 270.8b-12 Requirements as to paper, printing and language. ( a ) Registration statements and reports shall be filed on good quality, unglazed, white paper, no larger than 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches in size, insofar as practicable. To the extent that the reduction of larger documents would render them illegible, such documents may be filed on paper larger than 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches in size.
( b ) In the case of a registration statement filed on Form N-1A (§§ 239.15A and 274.11A of this chapter), Form N-2 (§§ 239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter), Form N-3 (§§ 239.17a and 274.11b of this chapter), Form N-4 (§§ 239.17b and 274.11c of this chapter), or Form N-6 (§ 239.17c and § 274.11d of this chapter), Part C of the registration statement shall be filed on good quality, unglazed, white paper, no larger than 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches in size, insofar as practicable. The prospectus and, if applicable, the Statement of Additional Information, however, may be filed on smaller-sized paper provided that the size of paper used in each document is uniform.
( c ) The registration statement or report and, insofar as practicable all papers and documents filed as a part thereof, shall be printed, lithographed, mimeographed or typewritten. However, the registration statement or report or any portion thereof may be prepared by any similar process which, in the opinion of the Commission, produces copies suitable for permanent record. Irrespective of the process used, all copies of any such material shall be clear, easily readable and suitable for repeated photocopying. Debits in credit categories and credits in debit categories shall be designated so as to be clearly distinguishable as such on photocopies.
( d ) The body of all printed registration statements and reports and all notes to financial statements and other tabular data included therein shall be in roman type at least as large as 10-point modern type. However, to the extent necessary for convenient presentation, financial statements and other statistical or tabular data, including tabular data in notes, may be set in type at least as large and as legible as 8-point modern type. All type shall be leaded at least 2-points.
( e ) Registration statements and reports shall be in the English language. If any exhibit or other paper or document filed with a registration statement or report is in a foreign language, it shall be accompanied by a translation into the English language.
( f ) Where a registration statement or report is distributed through an electronic medium, issuers may satisfy legibility requirements applicable to printed documents, such as paper size, type size and font, bold-face type, italics and red ink, by presenting all required information in a format readily communicated to investors, and where indicated, in a manner reasonably calculated to draw investor attention to specific information.
[49 FR 32060, Aug. 10, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 26160, June 25, 1985; 57 FR 56836, Dec. 1, 1992; 61 FR 24657, May 15, 1996; 67 FR 19870, Apr. 23, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4312 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4312

  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2012

   Mr. Bishop of New York (for himself, Mr. Turner of New York, Mr. 
Crowley, Mr. Kissell, Ms. Richardson, Mr. Towns, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Davis 
of California, and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Fathers Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS OF CERTAIN 
              PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DECEASED VETERANS.

    Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following:
                    ``(F) the parent of an individual who lost his or 
                her life under honorable conditions while serving in 
                the armed forces during a period named by paragraph 
                (1)(A) of this section, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse;
                    ``(G) the parent of a service-connected permanently 
                and totally disabled veteran, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse; and''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY

                                                                    State of
                                                                  Incorporation
                                                                  -------------

CIG Exploration, Inc..........................................       Delaware
CIG Field Services Company....................................       Delaware
   Subsidiary:
      *Great Divide Gas Services, LLC (73%)...................       Colorado
Colorado Water Supply Company.................................       Delaware
   Subsidiary:
      Colorado Interstate Production Company..................       Delaware

* Not consolidated
### §285p–3. Office on AIDS

The Director of the Institute shall establish within the Institute an Office on AIDS. The Office shall be responsible for the coordination of research and determining the direction of the Institute with respect to AIDS research related to—

(1) primary prevention of the spread of HIV, including transmission via sexual behavior;

(2) mental health services research; and

(3) other matters determined appropriate by the Director.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §464U, as added Pub. L. 102–321, title I, §124(b), July 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 366.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1992, with provision for programs providing financial assistance, see section 801(c), (d) of Pub. L. 102–321, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 236 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CLOROX COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998,
AS PRESENTED IN THE CLOROX COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FILED FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND AS
RESTATED HEREIN, AND IS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                        60
<RECEIVABLES>                                      464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4
<INVENTORY>                                        381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1047
<PP&E>                                            1765
<DEPRECIATION>                                     741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1146
<BONDS>                                            938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                        1297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4136
<SALES>                                           1912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1912
<CGS>                                              917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    276
<INCOME-TAX>                                       102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00089

- CV

VERMILLION FC, LP, Appellant

v.

1776 ENERGY PARTNERS,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court

, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 10

- 13812

- ZCV Honorable Donna S. Rayes , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order appellants’ brief due August 31, 2020. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that: (1) demonstrates extraordin ary circumstances justifying further delay; (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief; and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy workload to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### In re: Chauncey MARSHBURN, Petitioner.

No. 06-7943.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 1, 2007.

Chauncey Marshburn, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*94PER CURIAM:

Chauncey Marshburn petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reconsider its order dismissing Marshburn’s petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). Marshburn seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the court denied the motion for reconsideration on November 27, 2006. *See Marsh-bum v. Jackson,*No. 5:06-hc-02176-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2006). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
No. I-16-001 Jan. 25, 2016 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Proposes $3,500 Civil Penalty for Connecticut Firm

Over Nuclear Gauge Security Control Deficiencies

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is proposing a $3,500 fine for a Connecticut firm for 

a violation of agency requirements involving the security of portable nuclear gauges.

Megan LLC, of Bridgeport, Conn., which operates Fairfield Testing Laboratory, is licensed by 

the NRC for the use of such gauges, which contain radioactive material and are used for industrial 

purposes that include measuring the density of soil at construction sites. NRC regulations require the 

use of two independent controls to secure portable nuclear gauges from unauthorized removal 

whenever they are not under the control or constant surveillance of company personnel.

During an inspection on Aug. 12, 2015, an NRC inspector was at a temporary jobsite in 

Connecticut with a company technician when he observed that a portable nuclear gauge was stored in 

the trunk of a car. The device was in a locked transportation case secured to the vehicle. However, the 

vehicle’s doors were unlocked, allowing access to the trunk. What’s more, the gauge user was 

temporarily away from the vehicle and therefore ongoing control and surveillance were not maintained.

Based on this violation, the NRC is proposing a $3,500 civil penalty and Severity Level III 

Notice of Violation for the company. One of the determining factors is that Megan LLC was cited by 

the agency for a similar violation last February.

“This enforcement action re-emphasizes to this license-holder and others that they must be 

vigilant when it comes to the security of portable nuclear gauges,” NRC Region I Administrator Dan 

Dorman said. “In this case, because the locked transportation case remained in the vehicle’s trunk, there 

were no impacts on public health and safety.”

The company initiated prompt and comprehensive corrective actions after being notified of the 

issue, including increased auditing of temporary jobsites by its Radiation Safety Officer; employee 

retraining; and a discussion of the event during annual radiation training for all employees.

The company is required to respond to the violation and civil penalty within 30 days.