alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 146.450 Athletics. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be treated differently from another person, or otherwise be discriminated against in any interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics offered by a recipient, and no recipient shall provide any such athletics separately on such basis.
( b ) *Separate teams.* Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a recipient may operate or sponsor separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport. However, where a recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of the other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited, members of the excluded sex must be allowed to try out for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport. For the purposes of these Title IX regulations, contact sports include boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( c ) *Equal opportunity.* ( 1 ) A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics shall provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. In determining whether equal opportunities are available, the designated agency official will consider, among other factors: ( i ) Whether the selection of sports and levels of competition effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of members of both sexes;
( ii ) The provision of equipment and supplies;
( iii ) Scheduling of games and practice time;
( iv ) Travel and per diem allowance;
( v ) Opportunity to receive coaching and academic tutoring;
( vi ) Assignment and compensation of coaches and tutors;
( vii ) Provision of locker rooms, practice, and competitive facilities;
( viii ) Provision of medical and training facilities and services;
( ix ) Provision of housing and dining facilities and services;
( x ) Publicity.
( 2 ) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, unequal aggregate expenditures for members of each sex or unequal expenditures for male and female teams if a recipient operates or sponsors separate teams will not constitute noncompliance with this section, but the designated agency official may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex.
( d ) *Adjustment period.* A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the elementary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from September 29, 2000. A recipient that operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics at the secondary or postsecondary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from September 29, 2000.
### §274m. Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this part, there are authorized to be appropriated $31,009,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §379B, as added Pub. L. 105–196, §4(2), July 16, 1998, 112 Stat. 636; amended Pub. L. 109–129, §3(d), Dec. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 2562; Pub. L. 111–264, §2(d), Oct. 8, 2010, 124 Stat. 2792; Pub. L. 114–104, §2(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2216; Pub. L. 117–15, §2(d), May 26, 2021, 135 Stat. 278.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–15 substituted "$31,009,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026" for "$33,000,000 for fiscal year 2015 and $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020".

2015—Pub. L. 114–104 struck out "$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2014 and" after "to be appropriated" and inserted "and $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020" after "fiscal year 2015".

2010—Pub. L. 111–264 substituted "$30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2014 and $33,000,000 for fiscal year 2015." for "$34,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 and $38,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010."

2005—Pub. L. 109–129 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "For the purpose of carrying out this part, there are authorized to be appropriated $18,000,000 for fiscal year 1999, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2000 through 2003."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1998, see section 7 of Pub. L. 105–196, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 274k of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "
Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 22, 2005                     By:    /s/ Carmine N. Stella
                                                   ---------------------
                                          Name:    Carmine N. Stella
                                         Title:    Chief Executive Officer


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "
Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  August 22, 2005                     By:    /s/ Carol Russell
                                                   -----------------
                                          Name:    Carol Russell
                                         Title:    Treasurer
### §17197. Advanced geothermal computing and data science research and development

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a program of research and development of advanced computing and data science tools for geothermal energy.

#### (b) Programs

The program authorized in subsection (a) shall include the following:

#### (1) Advanced computing for geothermal systems technologies

Research, development, and demonstration of technologies to develop advanced data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and related computing tools to assist in locating geothermal resources, to increase the reliability of site characterization, to increase the rate and efficiency of drilling, to improve induced seismicity mitigation, and to support enhanced geothermal systems technologies.

#### (2) Geothermal systems reservoir modeling

Research, development, and demonstration of models of geothermal reservoir performance and enhanced geothermal systems reservoir stimulation technologies and techniques, with an emphasis on accurately modeling fluid and heat flow, permeability evolution, geomechanics, geochemistry, seismicity, and operational performance over time, including collaboration with industry and field validation.

#### (c) Coordination

In carrying out these programs, the Secretary shall ensure coordination and consultation with the Department of Energy's Office of Science. The Secretary shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, coordination of these activities with the Department of Energy National Laboratories, institutes of higher education, and the private sector.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §618, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1683; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3002(g)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2494.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to Center for Geothermal Technology Transfer.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
[Cite as State v. Trogrlic , 2023

- Ohio

- 4601.]



## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LAKE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CITY OF MENTOR,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

- vs
- MARIO TROGRLIC,

Defendant

- Appellant. CASE NO S

. 2023

- L

- 107 2023

- L

- 108
Criminal Appeal s from the Mentor Municipal Court

Trial Court No s

. 2023 CRB 00816 A

2023 CRB 00816 B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Decided: December 18, 2023 Judgment: Appeals dismissed

Lisa Klammer

, City of Mentor Prosecutor, 8500 Civic Center Boulevard, Mentor, OH 44060 (For Plaintiff

- Appellee).
Mario Trogrlic , pro se, #2023002384, Lake County Adult Detention Facility, 104 East Erie Street, Painesville, OH 44077 (Defendant

- Appellant).

JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.

{¶1} On November 14, 2023, appellant, Mario Trogrlic, pro se, filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s September 25, 2023 sentencing entries. A timely notice was
due no later than October 25, 2023, which was not a holiday or weekend. Thus, the
appeals were untimely filed by 20 days.

{¶2} “ * * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry
shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.
4(A)(1)

.2

Case No s

. 2023

- L

- 107 and 2023

- L

- 108 {¶3} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for
the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with
leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *

{¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and
shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right.

* * *.” App.R. 5(A)

. {¶6} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty

- day rule set forth in App.R.
4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Therefore , this court is without
jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Under the provisions of App.R. 5(A), appellant has a
remedy to move for leave to file an untimely criminal appeal

. {¶7} A ppeal s dismissed , sua sponte, as untimely.

MARY JANE TRAPP , J.,

ROBERT J. PATTON , J.,

concur.
#### In the Matter of Business Health, Inc., Respondent, v Harold Johnson et al., Constituting the Planning Board of the Town of Carmel, Appellants.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Carmel, which *627denied petitioner’s application for approval of a subdivision plat, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated August 11, 1976, which, *inter alia,*annulled the determinátion. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner-respondent is the owner of approximately 177 acres of land located in the Town of Carmel. In May, 1974 petitioner applied to the town planning board for approval of a two-lot subdivision. One lot of the subdivision was to consist of two acres out of petitioner’s total parcel. The planning board refused to approve the application unless petitioner set aside approximately 10% of its land as a recreation area. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and Special Term granted the petition holding, *inter alia,*that the planning board’s insistence on the *present*reservation of 10% of petitioner’s land is arbitrary and capricious. Special Term went on to hold that the planning board may "reserve [its] right to insist on a 17.7 acre recreational tract should petitioner propose a significant development of the property at some future date.” Furthermore, the court noted that "should petitioner continue to subdivide and sell off small parcels of land such that the remaining undeveloped parcels it retains approach an area of less than 17.7 acres, the reservation may be insisted on at that time.” Subdivision 1 of section 277 of the Town Law provides that a proposed subdivision plat shall "show in proper cases * * * a park or parks suitably located for playground or other recreational purposes.” Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the subdivision here contemplated (with one two-acre parcel) is a "proper” case in which to require dedication of more than 17 acres. However, we note as Special Term did, that the planning board may reserve its right to insist upon a 17.7-acre recreational tract at an appropriate date in the future. In this regard we take cognizance of the fact that petitioner, in its brief, states that it "has suggested that the [subject] subdivision plat contain a statement to the effect that in the event of the future development of the remaining parcel, the Planning Board may reserve its right to any recreational area.” Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6406

ROLAND EDWARD BELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland House of

Correction Annex; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-2067-S)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roland Edward Bell, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roland Edward Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-2067-S

(D. Md. Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2





Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INX Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ JAMES H. LONGJames H. LongChief Financial Officer




August 15, 2011
To: Docket IDs: EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495; EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602; EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603 

Date: February 3, 2015 

A meeting was held from 9:00 – 10:00 am on Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at the EPA Campus in Research 

Triangle Park, NC between representatives from the EPA and the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). The 

subject was CAA 111(b) and 111(d) proposals for greenhouse gas emissions from electric generating 

units. Participants were: 

EPA: Kevin Culligan, Nick Hutson, Christian Fellner

EEI: Alex Bond, John Kinsman
#### Virginia C. Mundy, Respondent, v. Norris H. Mundy, Jr., Appellant.

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 766.]
### §2691. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–103, title III, §302(c), Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 507

Section, Pub. L. 88–164, title IV, §401, Oct. 31, 1963, 77 Stat. 296; Pub. L. 90–31, §4(a), June 24, 1967, 81 Stat. 79; Pub. L. 91–211, title I, §§102(b), 104, 105, Mar. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 54–56; Pub. L. 91–517, title I, §102(a), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1324; Pub. L. 94–63, title III, §305(a), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 333, related to definitions, Federal percentages, and promulgation of percentages.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to appropriations under Pub. L. 94–103 for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 1975, see Pub. L. 94–103, title III, §303, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 507.
###### Editorial Note on Part 209

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 209 appear at 68 FR 51361, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 209.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance pursuant to any authority held or delegated by the Administrator of the Agency for International Development.
#### In the Matter of William Ryan v. State Liquor Authority.

Motion for a stay granted and the appeal is set down for argument or submission on November 25, 1960. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated October 18, 1960, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appeal is argued or submitted on November 25, 1960. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


               Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                               February 12, 2003



                             THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



            Delaware             001-02217             58-0628465
        (State or other        (Commission           (IRS Employer
          jurisdiction         File Number)        Identification No.)
        of incorporation)



              One Coca-Cola Plaza
                Atlanta, Georgia                        30313
    (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404)676-2121

<PAGE>

Item 7(c).      Exhibits

Exhibit 99      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated February 12, 2003,
                reporting The Coca-Cola Company's financial results for the
                fourth quarter of 2002 and for the year 2002.



Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

Attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 99 is a copy of a press
release of The  Coca-Cola  Company,  dated  February  12,  2003,  reporting  The
Coca-Cola Company's financial results for the fourth quarter of 2002 and for the
year 2002.

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                      THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                                          (REGISTRANT)


Date:  February __, 2003             By: ___________________________
                                         Connie D. McDaniel
                                         Vice President and



<PAGE>

Exhibit Index



 Exhibit No.
 -----------

Exhibit 99      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated February 12, 2003,
                reporting The Coca-Cola Company's financial results for the
                fourth quarter of 2002 and for the year 2002.
### §285t–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title II, §2022(c)(1), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1054

Section, July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §464z–5, formerly §485G, as added Pub. L. 106–525, title I, §103, Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2503; amended Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §103(b)(46), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3688; renumbered §464z–5 and amended Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10334(c)(1)(D)(i), (iii), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 973, related to loan repayment program for minority health disparities research.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Optical Internetworking Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Optical Internetworking 
Forum (``OIF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Optical 
Internetworking Forum, Fremont, CA. The nature and scope of OIF's 
standards development activities are: (1) To support the rapid 
advancement of an efficient and compatible technology base that 
promotes a competitive marketplace; (2) to promote global development 
of optical internetworking technology; (3) to identify optical 
internetworking applications; (4) to provide educational services; (5) 
to promote worldwide compatibility and interoperability; (6) to 
encourage input to appropriate national and international standards 
bodies; (7) to identify, select, augment as appropriate, and publish 
optical internetworking implementation agreements drawn from 
appropriate national and international standards; and (8) to foster the 
development and deployment of interoperable products and services for 
data switching and routing using optical networking technologies.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27546 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M