alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1006.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the Inter-American Foundation grants an exception under § 1006.120.
§ 1006.330 What requirements must I pass down to persons at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business? Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at the next lower tier, you must require that participant to— ( a ) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the transaction. You may do so using any method(s), unless § 1006.440 requires you to use specific methods.
( b ) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next lower tier.
Exhibit 10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.




January 25, 2006




Mr. Richard V. Sandler

1250 Fourth St.

Santa Monica, Ca. 90401




Dear Richard:



Reference is made to the agreement between Nextera Enterprises, Inc. ( the “Company”) and you dated
as of February 1, 2003 pertaining to your services as Vice Chairman of the Board of the Company
(the “Agreement”).



This letter will acknowledge that you have been serving as Chairman of the Board of the Company and
the terms of the Agreement have been applicable to your services in that capacity.



This letter is to also confirm that effective as of January 1, 2006, your monthly compensation as
Chairman of the Board will be $6,667. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.



Please confirm your understanding of the foregoing by signing this letter in the space provided
below.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,





Nextera Enterprises, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ STANLEY E. MARON
 	 
	 	 	Stanley E. Maron, Secretary 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



Agreed and Accepted:




/s/ RICHARD V. SANDLER

Richard V. Sandler




Dated: January 25, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12b-6 When securities are deemed to be registered.

A class of securities with respect to which a registration statement has been filed pursuant to section 12 of the act shall be deemed to be registered for the purposes of sections 13, 14, 15(d) and 16 of the act and the rules and regulations thereunder only when such statement has become effective as provided in section 12, and securities of said class shall not be subject to sections 13, 14 and 16 of the act until such statement has become effective as provided in section 12.

(Secs. 3, 14, 16, 48 Stat. 882, 895, 896, sec. 3(d), 78 Stat. 568; 15 U.S.C. 78c, 78n, 78p, 78*l*)

[30 FR 482, Jan. 14, 1965]
#### § 316.1 Scope.

This part implements the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (“CAN-SPAM Act”), 15 U.S.C. 7701-7713.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of New York Regional Rail  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wayne A. Eastman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
   -----------------------
   Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
   President

November 19, 2003
Searched for **https://www.facadatabase.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.facadatabase.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
§ 171.46 Standards of review. In reviewing the decision of the National Futures Association in a member responsibility action, the Commission shall consider whether: ( a ) The proceedings were conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
( b ) The proceedings were conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
( c ) The weight of the evidence supports the findings of the National Futures Association concerning the reasons for the action;
( d ) The determination that summary action is necessary to protect the commodity futures markets, customers, or members of the National Futures Association rests on a reasonable interpretation of the NFA rules at issue;
( e ) The National Futures Association's application of its rules is consistent with the purposes of the Act;
( f ) In light of the findings of the National Futures Association concerning the reasons for the action and the public interest, the suspension, restriction or remedial action imposed by the National Futures Association is not excessive, oppressive or an abuse of discretion.
Exhibit
32.2

Section 1350 certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the quarterly
report of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alan J. Sandler, Secretary to the
Board, Vice President and principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                      
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                              
| |    |                                                                                                                                                      
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Dated: May 16, 2011                                                                                                       
| |                                                                                                                           
| | /s/ Alan J. Sandler                                                                                                       
| | Alan J. Sandler, Secretary
 to the Board, Vice President and principal financial officer and principal
 accounting officer

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

26

---
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4161 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United States 

Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility located 

in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2012 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that 

the United States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility located in a ZIP code with 

a high rate of population growth, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Quality 

5 Postal Delivery for the Future Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4161 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLOSURE OR CONSOLIDATION OF POSTAL FACILI2 TIES IN ZIP CODES WITH HIGH POPULATION 

3 GROWTH. 

4 Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

7 title, the Postal Service may not close or consolidate any 

8 post office or other postal facility that is located in a ZIP 

9 code that has a high rate of population growth. 

10 ‘‘(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after the date of en11 actment of this subsection, and not later than 60 days 

12 after the end of each year thereafter, the Postmaster Gen13 eral shall determine, in consultation with the Secretary of 

14 Commerce, whether a ZIP code has a high rate of popu15 lation growth for purposes of paragraph (1). 

16 ‘‘(B) In making the annual determination required 

17 under subparagraph (A), the Postmaster General shall, 

18 using population data available from the Bureau of the 

19 Census, compare the population of a ZIP code at the end 

20 of such year with the population of such ZIP code at the 

21 beginning of such year.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 10.36 UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF GLOBAL EXCHANGE SERVICES, INC. The undersigned, being all members of the Board of Directors of Global
eXchange Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the Corporation), in
accordance with Section 141 (f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, hereby consent to the adoption of the fallowing resolution as if such
resolution had been adopted at a duly convened meeting of the Executive
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation: WHEREAS pursuant to a resolution adopted by unanimous consent by the Board of
Directors, effective as of November 1, 2002, the Board adopted the GXS
Investment and Savings Plan (the Plan); WHEREAS such approval by the Corporations Board of Directors included the
approval of Profit Sharing Contributions by the Corporation to the plan in
the amount of 6% of participating employees compensation in 2004 and 2005; WHEREAS the Corporations Board of Directors has determined that it is not now
in the best interests of the Corporation for the Corporation to make such
Profit Sharing Contributions; WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the Corporation reserved the right to
establish and amend the terms of the Plans; WHEREAS the Board of Directors believes that it is appropriate and in the best
interests of the Corporation and the Participants for the Profit Sharing
Contributions described in Section 7.02 of the Plan which were made prior to
the date hereof to be 100% vested; NOW THEREFORE,it is hereby RESOLVED THAT,effective January 1, 2004:  1.
    
    The Plan is amended by adding a new last sentence to Section 7.02(a),
Employer Profit Sharing Contributions, to read as follows: Regardless of the above, any Employee of the Corporation with an
Hour of Service after January 1, 2004 shall be 100% vested and
have a non-forfeitable right to all prior or future contributions
to his Employer Profit-Sharing Account.  2.
    
    Any officer of the Corporation or the Administrative Committee for the
Plan is hereby authorized to take all steps as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to give effect
to the foregoing.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Unanimous Written Consent shall be effective as of
April 20, 2004. /s/ John Soenksen
    
    /s/ Bruce HunterJohn Soenksen
    
    Bruce Hunter
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1111

In re: RODNEY A. KOON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:16

- ct

- 03301

- FL )

Submitted : May 23, 2019 Decided: May 28, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Rodney A. Koon , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rodney A. Koon petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the defendants in a pending civil action to pay him an award of compensatory damages and attorney’s fees . We conclude that Koon is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic r emedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. The relief sought by Koon is not available by way of mandamus , and the record
does not reveal undue delay in the district court . Accordingly, we deny the petition fo r writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
### §247d–5a. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3044(b)(1), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1121

Section, Pub. L. 110–85, title XI, §1111, Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 975, related to identification of clinically susceptible concentrations of antimicrobials. See section 360a–2 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 133

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

#### § 133.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00284-CR

Kenneth Allen GOETZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR7400W

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 

368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. 

Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with 

a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no 

pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). The 

State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro 

se brief.

If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting 

the record within ten days from the date of this order. If the appellant desires to file a pro se 

brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 

n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty

days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that 

the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further 

order of the court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of
#### § 402.2b [Reserved]
# Euroopa Liidu L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0650 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | L 199 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Õigusaktid | 61. aastakäik7. august 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0650

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

L 199

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Õigusaktid

61. aastakäik7. august 2018

---

| Sisukord | | II   Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RAHVUSVAHELISED LEPINGUD |
| | * | Teave Euroopa Liidu ja Norra Kuningriigi vahelise käibemaksu valdkonnaga seotud halduskoostööd, pettuste vastast võitlust ja nõuete sissenõudmist käsitleva lepingu jõustumise kohta | 1 |

Sisukord

II   Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid

Lehekülg

RAHVUSVAHELISED LEPINGUD

*

Teave Euroopa Liidu ja Norra Kuningriigi vahelise käibemaksu valdkonnaga seotud halduskoostööd, pettuste vastast võitlust ja nõuete sissenõudmist käsitleva lepingu jõustumise kohta

1

| ET | Aktid, mille peakiri on trükitud harilikus trükikirjas, käsitlevad põllumajandusküsimuste igapäevast korraldust ning nende kehtivusaeg on üldjuhul piiratud.
  Kõigi ülejäänud aktide pealkirjad on trükitud poolpaksus kirjas ja nende ette on märgitud tärn. |
| --- | --- |

ET

Aktid, mille peakiri on trükitud harilikus trükikirjas, käsitlevad põllumajandusküsimuste igapäevast korraldust ning nende kehtivusaeg on üldjuhul piiratud.

Kõigi ülejäänud aktide pealkirjad on trükitud poolpaksus kirjas ja nende ette on märgitud tärn.

---

II Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid

RAHVUSVAHELISED LEPINGUD

| 7.8.2018 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

L 199/1

---

Teave Euroopa Liidu ja Norra Kuningriigi vahelise käibemaksu valdkonnaga seotud halduskoostööd, pettuste vastast võitlust ja nõuete sissenõudmist käsitleva lepingu jõustumise kohta

Pärast lepingu allkirjastamist 6. veebruaril 2018 teavitasid Euroopa Liit ja Norra Kuningriik teineteist (vastavalt 9. juulil 2018 ja 26. juunil 2018) lepingu artikli 44 lõikes 1 osutatud siseriiklike õiguslike menetluste lõpuleviimisest (1).

1

Leping jõustub 1. septembril 2018 vastavalt selle artikli 44 lõikele 2.

---

(1)  Euroopa Liidu ja Norra Kuningriigi vaheline käibemaksu valdkonnaga seotud halduskoostööd, pettuste vastast võitlust ja nõuete sissenõudmist käsitlev leping (ELT L 195, 1.8.2018, lk 3).

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**OccupationalHealth and the Service Member
 
PDF|EPUB |MOBI |
 
SuDoc Number:D 104.35:OC 1
Item Number:0352-F-02 (online)
System Number:001099178
August 15, 2019
#### § 1506.31 May USADF reduce or negotiate a claim amount?

USADF may compromise claims for money or property where the principal balance of a claim, excluding interest, penalty and administrative costs, does not exceed $100,000. Where the claim exceeds $100,000, the authority to accept the compromise rests solely with DOJ. The CFO may reject an offer of compromise in any amount. Where the claim exceeds $100,000, USADF may refer the claim to DOJ for approval with a recommendation to accept an offer of compromise. The referral will be in the form of a Claims Collection Litigation Report (CCLR) and will outline the basis for USADF's recommendation.
### §2487d. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title XI, §1101(g), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3292

Section, Pub. L. 102–588, title VI, §605, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5131, related to joint studies with the republics of former Soviet Union in biomedical research.
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.7a-9 Delaying amendments. ( a ) An amendment in the following form filed with an application for qualification, or as an amendment to such an application which has not become effective, shall be deemed to be filed on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay the effective date of such application for the period specified in such amendment: The obligor hereby amends this application for qualification on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effectiveness until (i) the 20th day after the filing of a further amendment which specifically states that it shall supersede this amendment, or (ii) such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to section 307(c) of the Act, may determine upon the written request of the obligor.
( b ) An amendment pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section which is filed with an application for qualification shall be set forth on the facing page thereof. Any such amendment filed after the filing of the application may be made by letter or telegram and may be signed by the agent for service. Any amendment filed to supersede an amendment filed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may also be made by letter or telegram. Every such telegraphic amendment shall be confirmed in writing within a reasonable time by filing a signed copy of the amendment. Such confirmation shall not be deemed an amendment.
[30 FR 12387, Sept. 29, 1965]
§ 1006.945 Excluded or exclusion. *Excluded or exclusion* means— ( a ) That a person or commodity is prohibited from being a participant in covered transactions, whether the person has been suspended; debarred; proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4; voluntarily excluded; or
( b ) The act of excluding a person.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 366 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 366 EH

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AU2 THORIZATION OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSI4 NESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 

7 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

8 (Public Law 109–316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

9 amended by section 1 of Public Law 111–251 (124 Stat. 

10 2631), is amended by striking ‘‘January 31, 2011’’ each 

11 place it appears and inserting ‘‘May 31, 2011’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 30, 2011. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 25, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 366 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of 

other purposes. Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for programs under the Small Business Act and the