alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15701. Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1) Hurricanes, tropical storms, tornadoes, and thunderstorms can cause significant loss of life, injury, destruction of property, and economic and social disruption. All States and regions are vulnerable to these hazards.

(2) The United States currently sustains several billion dollars in economic damages each year due to these windstorms. In recent decades, rapid development and population growth in high-risk areas has greatly increased overall vulnerability to windstorms.

(3) Improved windstorm impact reduction measures have the potential to reduce these losses through—

(A) cost-effective and affordable design and construction methods and practices;

(B) effective mitigation programs at the local, State, and national level;

(C) improved data collection and analysis and impact prediction methodologies;

(D) engineering research on improving new structures and retrofitting existing ones to better withstand windstorms, atmospheric-related research to better understand the behavior and impact of windstorms on the built environment, and subsequent application of those research results; and

(E) public education and outreach.

(4) There is an appropriate role for the Federal Government in supporting windstorm impact reduction. An effective Federal program in windstorm impact reduction will require interagency coordination, and input from individuals, academia, the private sector, and other interested non-Federal entities.

(Pub. L. 108–360, title II, §202, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1675.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2015 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–52, §1, Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 496, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 15702 to 15704 and 15706 of this title] may be cited as the 'National Windstorm Impact Reduction Act Reauthorization of 2015'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 108–360, title II, §201, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1675, provided that: "This Act [probably should be 'this title', enacting this chapter and amending section 1885d of this title] may be cited as the 'National Windstorm Impact Reduction Act of 2004'."
#### § 123.13 Domestic aircraft shipments via a foreign country.

A license is not required for the shipment by air of a defense article from one location in the United States to another location in the United States via a foreign country.

[81 FR 54736, Aug. 17, 2016]
§ 229.1605 (Item 1605) Background of and reasons for the de-SPAC transaction; terms of the de-SPAC transaction; effects. ( a ) Provide a summary of the background of the de-SPAC transaction. Such summary must include a description of any contacts, negotiations, or transactions that have occurred concerning the de-SPAC transaction.
( b ) State the material terms of the de-SPAC transaction, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) A brief description of the de-SPAC transaction;
( 2 ) A brief description of any related financing transaction, including any payments from the SPAC sponsor to investors in connection with the financing transaction;
( 3 ) A reasonably detailed discussion of the reasons of the SPAC and the target company for engaging in the de-SPAC transaction and reasons of the SPAC for the structure and timing of the de-SPAC transaction and any related financing transaction;
( 4 ) An explanation of any material differences in the rights of SPAC and target company security holders as compared with security holders of the combined company as a result of the de-SPAC transaction;
( 5 ) A brief statement as to the accounting treatment of the de-SPAC transaction; and
( 6 ) The Federal income tax consequences of the de-SPAC transaction to the SPAC, the target company, and their respective security holders.
( c ) Describe the effects of the de-SPAC transaction and any related financing transaction on the special purpose acquisition company and its affiliates, the SPAC sponsor and its affiliates, the target company and its affiliates, and unaffiliated security holders of the special purpose acquisition company. The description must include a reasonably detailed discussion of both the benefits and detriments of the de-SPAC transaction and any related financing transaction to the special purpose acquisition company and its affiliates, the SPAC sponsor and its affiliates, the target company and its affiliates, and unaffiliated security holders of the special purpose acquisition company. The benefits and detriments of the de-SPAC transaction and any related financing transaction must be quantified to the extent practicable.
( d ) Disclose any material interests in the de-SPAC transaction or any related financing transaction: held by the SPAC sponsor or the special purpose acquisition company's officers or directors, including fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities as well as any interest in, or affiliation with, the target company; or held by the target company's officers or directors that consist of any interest in, or affiliation with, the SPAC sponsor or the special purpose acquisition company.
( e ) State whether or not security holders are entitled to any redemption or appraisal rights. If so, summarize the redemption or appraisal rights. If there are no redemption or appraisal rights available for security holders who object to the de-SPAC transaction, briefly outline any other rights that may be available to security holders.
§ 1101.10 Accounting for disclosures. ( a ) Each system manager shall establish a system of accounting for all disclosures of records, either orally or in writing made outside the Section, unless otherwise exempted under this section. Accounting procedures may be established in the least expensive and most convenient form that will permit the PA Officer to advise individuals promptly upon request of the persons or agencies to which records concerning them have been disclosed. Accounting of disclosures made under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(7) relating to civil or criminal law enforcement activities shall not be made available to the individual named in the record.
( b ) Accounting records, at a minimum, shall include the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record and the name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure was made. Accounting records shall be maintained for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer.
( c ) Accounting is not required to be kept for disclosure made within the Section or disclosures made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
( d ) If an accounting of the disclosure was made, the PA Officer shall inform any person or other agency about any correction or notation of dispute made by the Section in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) of any record that has been disclosed to the person or agency.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Grace H. Wentworth, as Executrix, etc., of John W. Wentworth, Deceased, to Compel Henry L. Armstrong, as Executor, etc., of Mary Emma Armstrong, Deceased, to Render and File an Account of His Proceedings as Such Executor and Trustee.

Decision amended by striking out provision as to costs. In other respects motion denied. [See 190 App. Div. 829.]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Commitment of Richard A. Dunsmore

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00101

- CV

Trial court case number: 84023

- CV

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

Appellant Richard Dunsmore

, proceeding pro se, has been declared a vexatious litigant and

is the subject of a pre

- filing order , signed on D ec emb e r 1 2 , 2 0 1 8

, in In re Commitment of

Richard A. Dunsmore

, Cause No. 8 4 0 2 3

- C V in the 412 th District Court of Brazoria County,

Texas. See Office of Court Administration List of Vexatious Litigants Subject to Pre

- Filing

Orders under Section 11.101, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, available at

https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1443162/richard

- dunsmore.pdf ) (last viewed on June 11, 2019 ;

see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 11.104(b) (requiring office of court administration

to maintain list and post list of vexatious litigants on agency’s website); Douglas v. Am. Title

Co.

, 196 S.W.3d 876, 878 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (taking judicial

notice of Harris County record of vexatious litigants).

The Clerk of this Court may not file an appeal presented by a vexatious litigant subject

to a pre

- filing order unless the litigant first obtains an order from the local administrative

judge permitting the filing, or the appeal is from a pre

- filing order designating the person a

vexatious litigant. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.103(a). Appellant is not

appealing from a pre

- filing order designating him a vexatious litigant. See id. at § 11.103(d).

Accordingly, unless appellant files proof that he has previously obtained an order from

the local administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal, this appeal may be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction without further notice

. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

§ 11.103(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). Appellant’s response, if any, is due to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court within 10 days from the date of this notice.

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature:

___ Justice Sarah B. Landau

__________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ June 13, 2019

___
§ 23.203 Records; retention and inspection. ( a ) *Location of records* — ( 1 ) *Records.* All records required to be kept by a swap dealer or major swap participant by the Act and by Commission regulations shall be kept at the principal place of business of the swap dealer or major swap participant or such other principal office as shall be designated by the swap dealer or major swap participant. If the principal place of business is outside of the United States, its territories or possessions, then upon the request of a Commission representative, the swap dealer or major swap participant must provide such records as requested at the place in the United States, its territories, or possessions designated by the representative within 72 hours after receiving the request.
( 2 ) *Contact information.* Each swap dealer and major swap participant shall maintain for each of its offices a listing, by name or title, of each person at that office who, without delay, can explain the types of records the swap dealer or major swap participant maintains at that office and the information contained in those records.
( b ) *Record retention.* ( 1 ) The records required to be maintained by this chapter shall be maintained in accordance with the provisions of § 1.31 of this chapter, except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. All such records shall be open to inspection by any representative of the Commission, the United States Department of Justice, or any applicable prudential regulator. Records relating to swaps defined in section 1a(47)(A)(v) shall be open to inspection by any representative of the Commission, the United States Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any applicable prudential regulator.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Records of any swap data reported in accordance with part 45 of this chapter shall be maintained in accordance with the requirements of § 45.2 of this chapter.
[77 FR 20202, Apr. 3, 2012, as amended at 82 FR 24487, May 30, 2017]
#### Broadway Distributing Corp. v. Sol Goldman et al.

Motion for an order increasing to $50,000 the amount of the undertaking to be filed by plaintiff-respondent denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.3a12-7 Exemption for certain derivative securities traded otherwise than on a national securities exchange.

Any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege traded exclusively otherwise than on a national securities exchange and for which quotations are not disseminated through an automated quotation system of a registered securities association, which relates to any securities which are direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal or interest by, the United States, or securities issued or guaranteed by a corporation in which the United States has a direct or indirect interest as shall be designated for exemption by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 3(a)(12) of the Act, shall be exempt from all provisions of the Act which by their terms do not apply to any “exempted security” or “exempted securities,” provided that the securities underlying such put, call, straddle, option or privilege represent an obligation equal to or exceeding $250,000 principal amount.

(15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.,* and particularly secs. 3(a)(12), 15(a)(2) and 23(a) (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(12), 78*o*(a)(2) and 78w(a)))

[49 FR 5073, Feb. 10, 1984]
#### § 242.813 Prohibited use of data collected for regulatory purposes.

A security-based swap execution facility shall not use for business or marketing purposes any proprietary data or personal information it collects or receives, from or on behalf of any person, for the purpose of fulfilling its regulatory obligations; provided, however, that a security-based swap execution facility may use such data or information for business or marketing purposes if the person from whom it collects or receives such data or information clearly consents to the security-based swap execution facility's use of such data or information in such manner. A security-based swap execution facility shall not condition access to its market(s) or market services on a person's consent to the security-based swap execution facility's use of proprietary data or personal information for business or marketing purposes. A security-based swap execution facility, where necessary for regulatory purposes, may share such data or information with one or more security-based swap execution facilities or national securities exchanges registered with the Commission.
### §2166. Applicability of other laws

(a) Sections 2161 to 2165 of this title shall not exclude the applicable provisions of any other laws, except that no Government agency shall take any action under such other laws inconsistent with the provisions of those sections.

(b) The Commission shall have no power to control or restrict the dissemination of information other than as granted by this or any other law.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §146, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 943; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1810(b)(6) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
### §2286l. Authority of Inspector General

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in this fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the Inspector General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is authorized to exercise the same authorities with respect to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, as determined by the Inspector General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as the Inspector General exercises under chapter 4 of title 5 with respect to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

(Pub. L. 113–235, div. D, title IV, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2330; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(81), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4351.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited in the credit of this section, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5" for "the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to the text of this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 113–76, div. D, title IV, §401, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 182.
# Dziennik Urzędowy L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0766 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | L 199 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Legislacja | Rocznik 617 sierpnia 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0766

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

L 199

Wydanie polskie

Legislacja

Rocznik 617 sierpnia 2018

---

| Spis treści | | II   Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE |
| | * | Informacja o wejściu w życie Umowy pomiędzy Unią Europejską a Królestwem Norwegii o współpracy administracyjnej, zwalczaniu oszustw oraz odzyskiwaniu wierzytelności w dziedzinie podatku od wartości dodanej | 1 |

Spis treści

II   Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym

Strona

UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE

*

Informacja o wejściu w życie Umowy pomiędzy Unią Europejską a Królestwem Norwegii o współpracy administracyjnej, zwalczaniu oszustw oraz odzyskiwaniu wierzytelności w dziedzinie podatku od wartości dodanej

1

| PL | Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.
  Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną. |
| --- | --- |

PL

Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.

Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną.

---

II Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym

UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE

| 7.8.2018 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

L 199/1

---

Informacja o wejściu w życie Umowy pomiędzy Unią Europejską a Królestwem Norwegii o współpracy administracyjnej, zwalczaniu oszustw oraz odzyskiwaniu wierzytelności w dziedzinie podatku od wartości dodanej

W następstwie podpisania umowy w dniu 6 lutego 2018 r. Unia Europejska i Królestwo Norwegii powiadomiły się wzajemnie (odpowiednio w dniach 9 lipca 2018 r. i 26 czerwca 2018 r.) o zakończeniu wewnętrznych procedur prawnych, o których mowa w art. 44 ust. 1 tej umowy (1).

1

W związku z powyższym umowa ta, zgodnie z jej art. 44 ust. 2, wejdzie w życie w dniu 1 września 2018 r.

---

(1)  Umowa pomiędzy Unią Europejską a Królestwem Norwegii o współpracy administracyjnej, zwalczaniu oszustw oraz odzyskiwaniu wierzytelności w dziedzinie podatku od wartości dodanej (Dz.U. L 195 z 1.8.2018, s. 3).

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Richard P. Shea, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: September 1,   2016 | /s/ Richard P. Shea                                 |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Richard P. Shea                                     |
|                           | Senior Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Diaz, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 885]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered April 14, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court erred in admitting the defendant’s arrest photo into evidence. Identification was not an issue, and there was no other relevant purpose in admitting the photograph into evidence *(see, People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, *cert denied*416 US 905; *People v Rivera,*192 AD2d 561, 562; *People v Gerbino,*132 AD2d 566; *People v Black,*117 AD2d 512). However, the photograph merely showed the defendant in street clothes, standing next to a height measure, and was not prejudicial. Moreover, the prosecutor did not insinuate that the defendant’s appearance in the photograph made it more likely than not that a crime was committed *(see, People v Black, supra).*Under the circumstances, the error was harmless *(see, People v Rivera, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
### §238o. Restriction on use of funds for assisted suicide, euthanasia, and mercy killing

Appropriations for carrying out the purposes of this chapter shall not be used in a manner inconsistent with the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997 [42 U.S.C. 14401 et seq.].

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §246, as added Pub. L. 105–12, §9(e), Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 27.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 105–12, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 23, which is classified principally to chapter 138 (§14401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14401 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Apr. 30, 1997, and applicable to Federal payments made pursuant to obligations incurred after Apr. 30, 1997, for items and services provided on or after such date, subject to also being applicable with respect to contracts entered into, renewed, or extended after Apr. 30, 1997, as well as contracts entered into before Apr. 30, 1997, to the extent permitted under such contracts, see section 11 of Pub. L. 105–12, set out as a note under section 14401 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Gus Goodman, Respondent, against Maurice Finkelstein et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. In the Matter of Perry Goodman, Respondent, against Maurice Finkelstein et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

The finding of the commission on the issue of good faith was an unwarranted exercise of discretion. The determinations of the commission in the only orders made (and those are the only ones subject to review) that respondents failed to establish payment in cash to the seller of 20% of the purchase price, is based on the undisputed and conceded proof. The subsequent reductions of the mortgage in this case cannot be deemed to be part of the cash down payment. *(Matter of Brown*v. *Finkelstein,*275 App. Div. 772.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### §15606. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15606 was editorially reclassified as section 30306 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 37.11 [Reserved]
#### § 1006.600 How do suspension and debarment actions start?

When we receive information from any source concerning a cause for suspension or debarment, we will promptly report and investigate it. We refer the question of whether to suspend or debar you to our suspending or debarring official for consideration, if appropriate.
5336.609-1 Design Within Funding

Limitations

(c)(1) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5336.6 – ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES