alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 14619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05216]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8215]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sicily: Art and Invention Between Greece and Rome''

ACTION:  Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 5, 2012, notice was published on page 54647 of 
the Federal Register (volume 77, number 172) of determinations made by 
the Department of State pertaining to the exhibit ``Sicily: Art and 
Invention Between Greece and Rome.'' The referenced notice is corrected 
to accommodate additional objects to be included in the exhibition. 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the additional 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Sicily: Art and Invention 
Between Greece and Rome,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
additional objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the 
foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the additional exhibit objects at The J. Paul Getty Museum 
in Los Angeles, California from on or about April 3, 2013, until on or 
about August 19, 2013, at the Cleveland Museum of Art in Cleveland, 
Ohio from September 29, 2013 to January 5, 2014, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 26, 2013.
 J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-05216 Filed 3-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****PIFSC report on the AmericanSamoa limited-access longline fishery from
 
2013
2013_apr_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2013_fullyear_noaa_1..>
 
2013_jan_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2013_jan_mar_noaa_12..>
 
2013_jul_dec_noaa_12..>
 
2013_jul_sep_noaa_12..>
 
2013_oct_dec_noaa_12..>
 
 
2014
2014_apr_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2014_fullyear_noaa_1..>
 
2014_jan_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2014_jan_mar_noaa_12..>
 
2014_jul_dec_noaa_12..>
 
2014_jul_sep_noaa_12..>
 
2014_oct_dec_noaa_12..>
 
 
2015
2015_apr_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2015_fullyear_noaa_9..>
 
2015_fullyear_noaa_1..>
 
2015_jan_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2015_jan_mar_noaa_12..>
 
2015_jul_dec_noaa_12..>
 
2015_jul_sept_noaa_1..>
 
2015_oct_dec_noaa_12..>
 
 
2016
2016_apr_jun_noaa_14..>
 
2016_fullyear_noaa_1..>
 
2016_jan_jun_noaa_12..>
 
2016_jan_jun_noaa_14..>
 
2016_jan_mar_noaa_14..>
 
2016_jul_dec_noaa_14..>
 
2016_jul_dec_noaa_14..>
 
2016_jul_sep_noaa_14..>
 
2016_oct_dec_noaa_14..>
 
 
2017
2017_fullyear_noaa_1..>
 
2017_jan_jun_noaa_16..>
 
2017_jan_may_noaa_15..>
 
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.361:L 86/
Item Number:0609-C-29 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001103841
 
August 7, 2019**
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13p-1 Requirement of report regarding disclosure of registrant's supply chain information regarding conflict minerals.

Every registrant that files reports with the Commission under Sections 13(a) (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) or 15(d) (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) of the Exchange Act, having conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured or contracted by that registrant to be manufactured, shall file a report on Form SD within the period specified in that Form disclosing the information required by the applicable items of Form SD as specified in that Form (17 CFR 249b.400).

[77 FR 56362, Sept. 12, 2012]
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 19

- 10011

State of T exas ; State of Alabama ; State of Arizona ; State of Florida ; State of Georgia ; State of Indiana ; State of Kansas ; State of Louisiana ; State of Mississippi , by and through Governor Phil Bryant ; State of Missouri ; State of Nebraska ; State of North Dakota ; State of South Carolina ; State of South Dakota ; State of Tennessee ; State of Utah ; State of West Virginia ; State of Arkansas ; Neill Hurley ; John Nantz , Plaintiffs

— Appellees ,

versus

United States of America ; United States Department of Health and Human Services ; Alex A zar , II, Secretary , U.S. D epartment of

Health and Human Services ; United States Department of Internal Revenue ; Charles P. Rettig , in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue , Defendants

— Appellants ,

State of California ; State of Connecticut ; District of Columbia ; State of D elaware ; State of H awaii ; State of Illinois ; Andy Beshea r , Governor, State of Kentucky ; State of Massachusetts ; State of New Jersey ; State of New York ; State of North C arolina ; State of O regon ; State of Rhode Island ; State of Vermont ; State of Virginia ; State of Washington ; State of Minnesota , Intervenor Defendants

— Appellants

. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 22, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 19

- 10011

2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CV

- 167

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before King, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : In an opinion issued on June 17, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the case to us
with instructions to dismiss. California v. Texas , 141 S. Ct. 2104, 2120 (2021)

. In accordance with that decision, we now VACATE the judgment of the district court in its entirety and REMAND the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss the case. The Clerk is directed t o issue the mandate forthwith.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4155 

AN ACT 

To direct the head of each Federal department and agency 

to treat relevant military training as sufficient to satisfy 

training or certification requirements for Federal licenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4155 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Skills to Jobs 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAIN5 ING FOR ISSUANCE OF A FEDERAL LICENSE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The head of each Federal licens7 ing authority shall consider and may accept, in the case 

8 of any individual applying for a license, any relevant train9 ing received by such individual while serving as a member 

10 of the armed forces, for the purpose of satisfying the re11 quirements for such license. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act— 

13 (1) the term ‘‘license’’ means a license, certifi14 cation, or other grant of permission to engage in a 

15 particular activity; 

16 (2) the term ‘‘Federal licensing authority’’ 

17 means a department, agency, or other entity of the 

18 Government having authority to issue a license; 

19 (3) the term ‘‘armed forces’’ has the meaning 

20 given such term by section 2101(2) of title 5, United 

21 States Code; and 

22 (4) the term ‘‘Government’’ means the Govern23 ment of the United States. 

24 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

25 The head of each Federal licensing authority shall— 
3 

•HR 4155 EH

1 (1) with respect to any license a licensing au2 thority grants or is empowered to grant as of the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, prescribe any regula4 tions necessary to carry out this Act not later than 

5 180 days after such date; and 

6 (2) with respect to any license of a licensing au7 thority not constituted or not empowered to grant 

8 the license as of the date of enactment of this Act, 

9 prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this 

10 Act not later than 180 days after the date on which 

11 the agency is so constituted or empowered, as the 

12 case may be. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4155 

AN ACT 

To direct the head of each Federal department and 

ments for Federal licenses. ficient to satisfy training or certification requireagency to treat relevant military training as suf-
§ 50.79 Swaps entered into by savings and loan holding companies. ( a ) For purposes of this section, the term *savings and loan holding company* means an entity that is organized as a savings and loan holding company, as defined in section 10 of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933.
( b ) A swap entered into by a savings and loan holding company shall not be subject to the clearing requirement of section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act and this part if: ( 1 ) The savings and loan holding company has aggregated assets, including the assets of all of its subsidiaries, that do not exceed $10,000,000,000 according to the value of assets of each subsidiary on the last day of each subsidiary's most recent fiscal year;
( 2 ) One of the counterparties to the swap reports the swap to a swap data repository pursuant to §§ 45.3 and 45.4 of this chapter, and reports all information as provided in paragraph (b) of § 50.50 to a swap data repository; and
( 3 ) The swap is used to hedge or mitigate commercial risk as provided in paragraph (c) of § 50.50.
# tr -76 

# c. )

CBIC Control Number 

# 363089 

# 8

A8 P.O. Box 331, Millwood, VA 22646 (540) 837-1602



# Task Force

December 18, 2014

BY HAND

Document Control Office

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

Room 6428 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460

Re: Testing Consent Order for Ethylene Dichloride;

Interim 

# Report (Docket No. OPPT-2003-0010)

Dear Sirs:

Enclosed in sextuplicate is the six-month interim report required under the Enforceable Consent Agreement for Ethylene Dichloride, 68 Fed. Reg. 33125 (June 3, 2003) (the "ECA"), as amended, describing the status of testing conducted or to be conducted under the ECA.

Please do 

# not hesitate to contact me if there is any question about this status report.

Sincerely,

Peter E. Voyte , Ph.D.
Manager

Enclosures

cc: John E. Schaeffer W. Caffey Norman, Esq.DESCRIPTIONTriggersnotmetforsecondgenerationevaluationCombined reproductivetoxicitystudyinlifephaseCATEGORY 

# p. 

# 2

CV
#### The City of New York v. Arthur H. Masten.

Motion for preference granted for October thirteenth: Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin,Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
#### § 103.10 Appeals.

Any person adversely affected by a final order respecting an assessment may, within 30 days after the final order is issued, file a petition in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or for any other circuit in which the person resides or transacts business, to appeal the order.
#### In the Matter of Jose N. Torres, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 532]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered *1070April 21, 2005, in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

After receiving a determination denying his request for parole release, petitioner attempted to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it. In the order to show cause, Supreme Court directed that the order to show cause, petition, exhibits and any supporting documentation be served by ordinary first class mail on each named respondent as well as the Attorney General on or before January 19, 2006. Thereafter, respondent moved to dismiss the proceeding on the ground, among others, that it was never served with the papers as directed in the order to show cause. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was granted with an open release date of October 3, 2006. In light of petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board, this appeal is now moot and must be dismissed *(see Matter of Kalwasinski v Pataki,*25 AD3d 835 [2006]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 7, 2008


---



QuickLinks
No: 16-039 July 1, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Revises Regulations to Increase Potential Maximum Fine

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, following changes in federal law, has revised its 

regulations to increase the potential maximum civil penalty for violations of the Atomic Energy Act

from $140,000 to $280,000.

The agency is increasing the maximum civil penalty to meet the requirements of the Federal 

Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015. The law calls for an initial “catch-up” penalty 

adjustment to become effective no later than Aug. 1. The NRC will also follow the law’s requirement to 

annually adjust penalties for inflation, beginning in January 2017.

The NRC may assess penalties up to the new maximum in all cases assessed after Aug. 1, even 

if the violation occurred before that time. The NRC will soon publish conforming changes to the 

agency’s enforcement policy, which includes the process for assessing civil penalties based on the 

violation’s severity and the type of licensee.
#### § 1006.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in the EPLS?

If you have questions about a person in the *EPLS,* ask the point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name into the *EPLS.* You may find the agency point of contact from the *EPLS.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


RedEnvelope, Inc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alison L. May,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify:, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934; and

                  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        result of operations of the Company.




/s/ ALISON L. MAY
------------------------------------
Alison L. May
Chief Executive Officer
February 11, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 922
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 922 appear at 62 FR 3789, Jan. 27, 1997 and at 62 FR 67724, Dec. 30, 1997.

§ 922.1 Purposes and applicability of the regulations. ( a ) The purposes of this part are: ( 1 ) To implement title III of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1431 *et seq.,* also known as the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA or Act)), the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and Protection Act (FKNMSPA) (Pub. L. 101-605) and the Hawaiian Islands National Marine Sanctuary Act (sections 2301-2307 of Pub. L. 102-587); and
( 2 ) To implement the designations of the national marine sanctuaries, for which site specific regulations appear in subparts F through U of this part, by regulating activities affecting them, consistent with their respective terms of designation, in order to protect, restore, preserve, manage, and thereby ensure the health, integrity and continued availability of the conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, educational, cultural, archaeological and aesthetic resources and qualities of these areas.
( b ) The regulations of this part are binding on any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Designation of a national marine sanctuary beyond the U.S. territorial sea does not constitute any claim to territorial jurisdiction on the part of the United States. The regulations of this part shall be applied in accordance with generally recognized principles of international law,[1] and in accordance with treaties, conventions, and other agreements to which the United States is a party. No regulation of this part shall apply to a person who is not a citizen, national, or resident alien of the United States, unless in accordance with: ( 1 ) Generally recognized principles of international law;
( 2 ) An agreement between the United States and the foreign state of which the person is a citizen; or
( 3 ) An agreement between the United States and the flag state of the foreign vessel, if the person is a crew member of the vessel.
( c ) Unless noted otherwise, the regulations in this subpart and subpart D of this part apply to all national marine sanctuaries immediately upon designation.
[88 FR 958, Jan. 6, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 48286, June 6, 2024] Footnotes -
922.1
[1] Based on the legislative history of the NMSA, NOAA has long interpreted the text of 16 U.S.C. 1435(a) as encompassing international law, including customary international law.
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Dominick A. Bracalello, Deceased. County Trust Company as Coexecutor of Dominick A. Bracalello, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Ann Briante et al., Appellants.

In a second proceeding by the coexeeutor to construe paragraph “Third” of testator’s will, the six legatees named in said paragraph, who are his brother and five sisters, appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, entered Jauary 13, 1960, as adjudges: (1) that shares of stock owned by the testator in three family corporations at the time of the execution of the will do not pass to such legatees under said paragraph but become part of the residuary estate; and (2) that, at the time of the execution of the will, the testator, by its third paragraph intended to dispose of “ only that stock which was not to be covered by the *inter vivos*agreement, which hfe intended to execute and which in fact he did execute within six days after his Will ”. Paragraph “ Third ” of the will, which was executed on August 4, 1956, provides that .the legatees therein named shall receive any stock which the testator shall own in the three corporations at the time of his death “ which I have a right to convey ”. Six days later, on August 10, 1956, the testator and the three corporations entered into an agreement in which it was provided that, upon his death, each of the corporations would purchase his shares of stock upon stated terms and conditions and that payment therefor was to' be made to his estate or to such persons as his executors might direct. The aggregate purchase price was $100,000. The agreement also provided that the testator would not sell or dispose of the stock without first giving notice of his intention to the corporations. On a prior appeal to this court by the same legatees from a decree similarly construing said paragraph “ Third ” of the will, the decree was reversed and the proceeding remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to take proof of the testator’s intention as to the scope . of- such. paragraph and to receive the scrivener’s testimony in connection therewith *(Matter of Bracalello,*7 A D 2d 1022). -The learned Surrogate, after--taking such proof and testimony, has again construed • said paragraph' *“*Third ” in the same manner as he did previously. Decree insofar- as appealed from affirmed, with costs to all parties filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
§ 1003.10 Reports. ( a ) The Administrator or designee will provide adequate advance notice to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget of any proposal to establish or alter any Inter-American Foundation system or systems of records, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(o). This will permit an evaluation of the probable or potential effect of such proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals or the disclosure of information relating to such individuals, and its effect on the preservation of the constitutional principles of federalism and separation of powers.
( b ) If at any time an Inter-American Foundation system or systems of records is determined to be exempt from the application of 5 U.S.C. 552a in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j) and (k), the number of records contained in such system or systems will be separately listed and reported to the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the then prevailing guidelines and instructions of that agency.
#### Pasha Perevit, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sava Perevit, Deceased, Appellant, v. John Bilous et al., Respondents.

Assuming that the evidence was sufficient to justify an inference that decedent was struck by the truck owned by defendant Bilous and operated by defendant Coteaux, it is not sufficient to justify a further inference that the contact was due to the negligence of the operator of the truck. *(Wieland*v. *Third Ave. Tr. Corp.,*296 N. Y. 1047.) Present— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 1006.740 Are suspension proceedings formal? ( a ) Suspension proceedings are conducted in a fair and informal manner. The suspending official may use flexible procedures to allow you to present matters in opposition. In so doing, the suspending official is not required to follow formal rules of evidence or procedure in creating an official record upon which the official will base a final suspension decision.
( b ) You as a respondent or your representative must submit any documentary evidence you want the suspending official to consider.