alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.13n-2 Withdrawal from registration; revocation and cancellation. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section, *tag* (including the term *tagged*) has the same meaning as set forth in Rule 11 of Regulation S-T (17 CFR 232.11).
( b ) A registered security-based swap data repository may withdraw from registration by filing a withdrawal from registration on Form SDR (17 CFR 249.1500) electronically in a tagged data format. The security-based swap data repository shall designate on Form SDR a person to serve as the custodian of the security-based swap data repository's books and records. When filing a withdrawal from registration on Form SDR, a security-based swap data repository shall update any inaccurate information.
( c ) A withdrawal from registration filed by a security-based swap data repository shall become effective for all matters (except as provided in this paragraph (c)) on the 60th day after the filing thereof with the Commission, within such longer period of time as to which such security-based swap data repository consents or which the Commission, by order, may determine as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors, or within such shorter period of time as the Commission may determine.
( d ) A withdrawal from registration that is filed pursuant to this section shall be considered a “report” filed with the Commission for purposes of sections 18(a) and 32(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78r(a) and 78ff(a)) and the rules and regulations thereunder and other applicable provisions of the United States Code and the rules and regulations thereunder.
( e ) If the Commission finds, on the record after notice and opportunity for hearing, that any registered security-based swap data repository has obtained its registration by making any false and misleading statements with respect to any material fact or has violated or failed to comply with any provision of the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, the Commission, by order, may revoke the registration. Pending final determination of whether any registration shall be revoked, the Commission, by order, may suspend such registration, if such suspension appears to the Commission, after notice and opportunity for hearing on the record, to be necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
( f ) If the Commission finds that a registered security-based swap data repository is no longer in existence or has ceased to do business in the capacity specified in its application for registration, the Commission, by order, may cancel the registration.
[80 FR 14550, Mar. 19, 2015]
(December 15, 1960)

#### In the Matter of Edmund M. Mysiak et al., Petitioners, v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Petition, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit the Supreme Court in Nassau County, one of its Justices, and the petitioners in a habeas corpus proceeding presently pending in said court before such Justice, from taking any further action in said habeas corpus proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction. Cross motions by respondents, pursuant to section 1293 of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the said petition as a matter of law, on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to entitle petitioners to relief. Cross motions granted and petition dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §239g. Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this part, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2003 through 2007, to remain available until expended, including administrative costs and costs of provision and payment of benefits. The Secretary's payment of any benefit under section 239c, 239d, or 239e of this title shall be subject to the availability of appropriations under this section.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §268, as added Pub. L. 108–20, §2, Apr. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 645.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,170
<PP&E>                                         118,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,438
<BONDS>                                         36,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,727
<SALES>                                         84,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,453
<CGS>                                           62,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,362
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
### §13704. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13704 was editorially reclassified as section 12104 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3a12-11 Exemption from sections 8(a), 14(a), 14(b), and 14(c) for debt securities listed on a national securities exchange. ( a ) Debt securities that are listed for trading on a national securities exchange shall be exempt from the restrictions on borrowing of section 8(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78h(a)).
( b ) Debt securities registered pursuant to the provisions of section 12(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78 l (b)) shall be exempt from sections 14(a), 14(b), and 14(c) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78n(a), (b), and (c)), *except that* §§ 240.14a-1, 240.14a-2(a), 240.14a-9, 240.14a-13, 240.14b-1, 240.14b-2, 240.14c-1, 240.14c-6 and 240.14c-7 shall continue to apply.
( c ) For purposes of this section, *debt securities* is defined to mean any securities that are not “equity securities” as defined in section 3(a)(11) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(11)) and § 240.3a11-1 thereunder.
[59 FR 55347, Nov. 7, 1994]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3972 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3972

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of cotton.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of cotton.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Woven fabrics of    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        cotton,                                                            31/2014.......
                        containing 85
                        percent or more
                        by weight of
                        cotton, dyed,
                        plain weave,
                        weighing more
                        than 100 g/m2,
                        other, of numbers
                        43 to 68, poplin
                        or broadclot
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        5208.32.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mindy Dolny, Appellant, v David B. Dolny, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 520]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated June 27, 2005, as granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to preclude her from offering evidence at trial with respect to requested documents which had not been produced, for an inference in the defendant’s favor on all issues relating to those documents, and for an award of an attorney’s fee to the defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in *819granting those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to preclude the plaintiff from offering evidence at trial with respect to requested documents which had not been produced, for an inference in favor of the defendant on all issues related to those documents, and for an award of an attorney’s fee to the defendant *(see*CPLR 3126 [1], [2]). The plaintiffs willful and contumacious conduct could be inferred from her failure to comply with court orders directing her to comply with outstanding discovery demands and the inadequate excuses offered for her failure to comply *(see Stever v Stever,*10 AD3d 358 [2004]; *Caccioppoli v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr.,*271 AD2d 565 [2000]; *Kingsley v Kantor,*265 AD2d 529 [1999]).

The plaintiffs remaining contention does not require reversal. Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
----

----

| INDIANA                                  |   | 1-7160                   |   | 35-1101097          |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction             |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. Employer    |
| of incorporation or organization)        |   |                     |   | Identification No.) |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
| 2831 Dexter Drive, Elkhart, Indiana      |   |                     |   | 46514               |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   |                     |   | (Zip Code)          |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
|                                     |   | (574) 266-2500           |   |                |
| (Registrant’s telephone number,    |
| including area code)                     |
|                                     |   |                     |   |                |
|                                     |   | N / A                    |   |                |
| (Former Name or Former Address,          |
| if Changed Since Last Report)            |

| □ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)                  |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| □ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)                 |
| □ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| □ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

| Date:  | February 2, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ James T. Holden        |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |             |   |   |                       |
|   |             |   |   | James T. Holden, Secretary |
|   |             |   |   | Printed Name and Title     |

----

----
#### Dennis Riddell et al., Appellants, v June A. Brown et al., Defendants, and Great Lakes Energy Partners, L.L.C., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[820 NYS2d 914]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered July 6, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant Great Lakes Energy Partners, L.L.C. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to supplement the bill of particulars.

*1214It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court *(Riddell v Brown,*8 Misc 3d 1016[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51121[U]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### Mary E. McNulty, Respondent, v. Arthur P. McNulty, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
### §2826. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–424, §27(b)(1), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 705

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §233, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 704, related to evaluations, reports, and independent studies.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3961 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Blue 284. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Blue 284. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 284. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Disperse Blue 284, (Ethanol, 

2,2’-[[4-[2-(3,5-dinitro-2- 

thienyl)diazenyl]phenyl]imino]bis-, 

(1,1’-diacetate)) (CAS No. 

42783–06–2) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.11.10) ........ Free No change No chnage On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3961 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §1900a. Rules and regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–672, §2, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 951.)
### §2297h–13. Application of certain laws

#### (a) OSHA

(1) As of the privatization date, the private corporation shall be subject to and comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.).

(2) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration shall, within 90 days after April 26, 1996, enter into a memorandum of agreement to govern the exercise of their authority over occupational safety and health hazards at the gaseous diffusion plants, including inspection, investigation, enforcement, and rulemaking relating to such hazards.

#### (b) Antitrust laws

For purposes of the antitrust laws, the performance by the private corporation of a "matched import" contract under the Suspension Agreement shall be considered to have occurred prior to the privatization date, if at the time of privatization, such contract had been agreed to by the parties in all material terms and confirmed by the Secretary of Commerce under the Suspension Agreement.

#### (c) Energy Reorganization Act requirements

(1) The private corporation and its contractors and subcontractors shall be subject to the provisions of section 5851 of this title to the same extent as an employer subject to such section.

(2) With respect to the operation of the facilities leased by the private corporation, section 5846 of this title shall apply to the directors and officers of the private corporation.

(Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3115, Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–348.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 91–596, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1590, which is classified principally to chapter 15 (§651 et seq.) of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 651 of Title 29 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the USEC Privatization Act and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### §§ 249.310b-249.310c [Reserved]
#### EECP Centers of America, Inc., Appellant, v Vasomedical, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[717 NYS2d 897]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated August 9, 1999, which denied its motion for recusal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*350Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court did not err in denying its motion for recusal. In the absence of an express violation of Judiciary Law § 14, the decision on a recusal motion based upon alleged bias and prejudice, as in the instant case, is generally a matter of the court’s personal conscience and discretion *(see,*Judiciary Law § 14; *see also, People v Moreno,*70 NY2d 403; *Yannitelli v Yannitelli & Sons Constr. Corp:,*247 AD2d 271, *cert denied*525 US 1178; *Anjam v An-jam,*191 AD2d 531; *cf, Ortiz v City of New York,*136 Misc 2d 500). Here, that discretion was providently exercised. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### § 38.1201 Additional sources for compliance.

Applicants and designated contract markets may refer to the guidance and/or acceptable practices in appendix B of this part to demonstrate to the Commission compliance with the requirements of § 38.1200 of this part.
NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT MILLSTONE NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Josephine Ambrosini as the new Senior Resident Inspector 

at the Millstone nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn. Ambrosini joins 

Resident Inspectors Jim Krafty and Brian Haagensen at Millstone, which 

is operated by Dominion Nuclear.

Most recently, Ambrosini was a Resident Inspector at the Oyster 

Creek nuclear plant in Lacey Township, N.J. She joined the NRC’s 

Region I office in 2000 after earning a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Villanova 

University. After completing a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program, she worked as a 

reactor inspector at plants throughout the Northeast. Ambrosini then was accepted into the NRC 

Graduate Fellowship Program through which she earned a master’s degree in chemical 

engineering from Villanova. Upon her return to the agency, she performed inspections of 

independent spent fuel storage installations and other materials facilities. She has also worked as 

a project engineer. 

“Jo Ambrosini has the training, experience and commitment to safety that will help the 

NRC carry out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensure Dominion safely 

operates Millstone Station,” said NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, 

monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

Inspectors can serve up to seven years at any one site.

The Millstone resident inspectors can be reached at 860-447-3170.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406-2713

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-030

Contact: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan (610) 337-5331

July 3, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov