alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/ CHASE CAREY Chase Carey President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 6, 2008


---



QuickLinks
§ 165.10 Contents of record for award determination. ( a ) The following items constitute the record upon which the award determination under § 165.7 shall be made: ( 1 ) The whistleblower's Form TCR, “Tip, Complaint or Referral,” including related attachments, and other documentation provided by the whistleblower to the Commission;
( 2 ) The whistleblower's Form WB-APP, “Application for Award for Original Information Provided Pursuant to Section 23 of the Commodity Exchange Act,” and related attachments;
( 3 ) The complaint, notice of hearing, answers and any amendments thereto;
( 4 ) The final judgment, consent order, or administrative speaking order;
( 5 ) The transcript of the related administrative hearing or civil injunctive proceeding, including any exhibits entered at the hearing or proceeding;
( 6 ) Any other documents that appear on the docket of the proceeding;
( 7 ) Sworn declarations (including attachments) from the Commission's Division of Enforcement staff regarding any matters relevant to the award determination;
( 8 ) With respect to an award claim involving a Related Action, any statements or other information that an entity provides or identifies in connection with an award determination, provided the entity has authorized the Commission to share the information with the claimant. (Neither the Commission nor the Claims Review Staff may rely upon information that the entity has not authorized the Commission to share with the applicant); and
( 9 ) Any other documents or materials including sworn declarations from third-parties that are received or obtained by the Whistleblower Office to assist the Commission resolve the applicant's award application, including information related to the claimant's eligibility. (Neither the Commission nor the Claims Review Staff may rely upon information that a third party has not authorized the Commission to share with the claimant).
( b ) The rules in this part do not entitle a claimant to obtain from the Commission any materials (including any pre-decisional or internal deliberative process materials that are prepared to assist the Commission or Claims Review Staff in deciding the claim) other than those listed in paragraph (a) of this section. The Whistleblower Office may make redactions as necessary to comply with any statutory restrictions, to protect the Commission's law enforcement and regulatory functions, and to comply with requests for confidential treatment from other law enforcement and regulatory authorities.
[76 FR 53200, Aug. 25, 2011, as amended at 82 FR 24500, May 30, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.4d-10 Exemption for securities issued pursuant to § 230.802 of this chapter.

Any debt security, whether or not issued under an indenture, is exempt from the Act if made in compliance with § 230.802 of this chapter.

[64 FR 61406, Nov. 10, 1999]
§ 144.5 Procedures when production or disclosure of Commission records or information relating to Commission business is sought. ( a ) If in any proceeding oral testimony of an employee or former employee of the Commission is sought concerning matters related to the business of the Commission, an affidavit or, if that is not feasible, a signed statement by the party seeking the testimony or by his attorney, setting forth with particularity a summary of the testimony sought and its relevance to the proceeding, must be furnished to the Commission's General Counsel at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters. When authorization by the Commission is required, any authorization shall be limited to the scope of the demand as summarized in such statement.
( b ) If a response to a demand by a court or other authority is required before instructions from the Commission are received, and Commission authorization is required, a Commission attorney shall be designated by the General Counsel to appear and to inform the court or other authority of these regulations and that the subpoena or demand has been referred for prompt consideration by the Commission. The Commission attorney shall request a stay of the demand pending receipt of instructions.
( c ) In the event that the court or other authority declines to stay the effect of the demand pending receipt of instructions or in the event that the court rules that there must be compliance with the demand irrespective of instructions not to produce the material or disclose the information sought, the Commission employee or former employee upon whom the demand has been made shall respectfully decline to comply with the demand.
[50 FR 11149, Mar. 20, 1985, as amended at 89 FR 71816, Sept. 4, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4158 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4158

 To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States astronauts 
           to artifacts from the astronauts' space missions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2012

Mr. Hall (for himself, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Smith of 
Texas, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Costello, Ms. 
Fudge, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Olson, Mr. Hultgren, 
Mr. Benishek, Mr. Lipinski, Mrs. Adams, Mr. Posey, Mr. Rigell, and Mr. 
 Clarke of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States astronauts 
           to artifacts from the astronauts' space missions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ARTIFACT.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``artifact'' means, with respect 
to an astronaut described in section 2(a), any expendable item utilized 
in missions for the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs through the 
completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project not expressly required to 
be returned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration at the 
completion of the mission and other expendable, disposable, or 
personal-use items utilized by such astronaut during participation in 
any such program. The term includes personal logs, checklists, flight 
manuals, prototype and proof test articles used in training, and 
disposable flight hardware salvaged from jettisoned lunar modules. The 
term does not include lunar rocks and other lunar material.

SEC. 2. FULL OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS.

    (a) In General.--A United States astronaut who participated in any 
of the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo programs through the completion of 
the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, who received an artifact during his 
participation in any such program, shall have full ownership of and 
clear title to such artifact.
    (b) No Federal Government Claim.--The Federal Government shall have 
no claim or right to ownership, control, or use of any artifact in 
possession of an astronaut as described in subsection (a) or any such 
artifact that was subsequently transferred, sold, or assigned to a 
third party by an astronaut described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
(logo)**PACIFIC LIFE**

 

 

**MANAGEMENT’SREPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH**

**SECREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

 

PacificLife Insurance Company (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance,as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, with the Servicing Criteria setforth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC’s Regulation AB, excluding the criteria setforth in Item 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii),(d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x),(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv), which theAsserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the activities it performs,with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report(such criteria, after giving effect to the exclusions identified above, the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The transactions covered by this reportinclude all asset-backed transactions under the Securitized Commercial MortgageLoans Platform (the “Platform”), as listed in Appendix A.

 

TheAsserting Party has used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122of Regulation AB in order to assess the effectiveness of Pacific Life InsuranceCompany’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2022. The Asserting Party has concluded that it hascomplied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria asof and for the year ended December 31, 2022, with respect to the Platform takenas a whole.

 

Deloitte& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issuedan attestation report for the Platform on the assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 asset forth in this assertion.

 

 

PacificLife Insurance Company

 

 

/s/Edwin Ferrell

EdwinFerrell

VP,Investment Management

February17, 2023

 

 

**APPENDIXA**

 

 

**SECURITIZEDCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS PLATFORM**

 

 

**TrustName**                                                                          **Loan Name**

 

COMM2014-277P                                                                277 Park Avenue

HGMT2015-HGLR                                                              Houston Galleria Mall

DBJPM2016–SFC                                                               Westfield San Francisco Center

JPM2015 –WPG                                                                  Scottsdale Quarter

BMARK2019 –B12                                                             Woodlands Mall

CSMC2020-WEST                                                               Westchester Mall

 

 

** **

**PACIFICLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY**

700Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660-6307, Telephone (949)219-3011

Visitus at our website: www.Pacificlife.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      24,048,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,513,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,721,000
<PP&E>                                       3,442,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,575,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,588,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          299,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,278,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,588,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  809,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (519,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (519,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (519,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 49
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

§ 49.13 Monitoring, screening and analyzing swap data. ( a ) *Duty to monitor, screen and analyze SDR data.* A swap data repository shall monitor, screen, and analyze all relevant SDR data in its possession in such a manner as the Commission may require. A swap data repository shall routinely monitor, screen, and analyze SDR data for the purpose of any standing swap surveillance objectives that the Commission may establish as well as perform specific monitoring, screening, and analysis tasks based on ad hoc requests by the Commission.
( b ) *Capacity to monitor, screen and analyze SDR data.* A swap data repository shall establish and maintain sufficient information technology, staff, and other resources to fulfill the requirements in this § 49.13 in a manner prescribed by the Commission. A swap data repository shall monitor the sufficiency of such resources at least annually, and adjust its resources as its responsibilities, or the volume of swap transactions subject to monitoring, screening, and analysis, increase.
[76 FR 54575, Sept. 1, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 75659, Nov. 25, 2020]
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"),
I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May
      20, 2009
            /s/
      Carmine N. Stella
                Carmine
      N. Stella
                Chief
      Executive Officer








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"),
I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
      20, 2009
            /s/
      Carol Russell
                Carol
      Russell
                Treasurer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 26, 2012

d0919

Order 

September 26, 2012

144925

LAURIE MARBLE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 144925

COA: 305853

Ingham CC: 11-000218-AA

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 29, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §1973ff–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973ff–2 was editorially reclassified as section 20303 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 1386

UNDER SEAL 1

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

UNDER SEAL 2

- 39

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:18

- cv

- 02258

- GJH )

Submitted : November 13, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING

, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Under Seal 1, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

The Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing the civil complaint for

improper venue and declining to transfer the case because the complaint also failed to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. ∗ Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the district court’s

order. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406(a), 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proce ss.

AFFIRMED

∗ The district court granted the Appellant’s motion to seal the complaint and sealed the entire case, including the docket sheet. Although we limit our review to issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), we note that the public and press have a qualified right of access to judicial documents and records in civil cases, including docket sheets, see Doe v. Public Citizen

, 749 F.3d 246, 265

- 69 (4th Cir. 2014).
### §2224. Attorney General approval of title

All real property acquired under this chapter shall be subject to the provisions of sections 3111 and 3112 of title 40: Provided, however, That real property acquired by purchase or donation, or other means of transfer may also be occupied, used, and improved for the purposes of this chapter prior to approval of title by the Attorney General in those cases where the President determines that such action is required in the interest of the common defense and security.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §174, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 953; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

In text, "sections 3111 and 3112 of title 40" substituted for "section 355 of the Revised Statutes, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1813(b) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
### §2160a. Review of Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statements

No court or regulatory body shall have any jurisdiction under any law to compel the performance of or to review the adequacy of the performance of any Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statement, or any annexes thereto, called for in this Act or in the 1954 Act.

(Pub. L. 95–242, title IV, §406, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 148; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, title XII, §1225(e)(5), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95–242, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120, which is classified principally to chapter 47 (§3201 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3201 of Title 22 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–277 inserted ", or any annexes thereto," before "called for in".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective on earlier of Apr. 1, 1999, or date of abolition of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency pursuant to reorganization plan described in section 6601 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of Title 22.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 10, 1978, except as otherwise provided and regardless of any requirements for the promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 603(c) of Pub. L. 95–242, set out as a note under section 3201 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 3203 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
§ 270.10b-1 Definition of regular broker or dealer. The term *regular broker or dealer* of an investment company shall mean: ( a ) One of the ten brokers or dealers that received the greatest dollar amount of brokerage commissions by virtue of direct or indirect participation in the company's portfolio transactions during the company's most recent fiscal year;
( b ) One of the ten brokers or dealers that engaged as principal in the largest dollar amount of portfolio transactions of the investment company during the company's most recent fiscal year; or
( c ) One of the ten brokers or dealers that sold the largest dollar amount of securities of the investment company during the company's most recent fiscal year.
[49 FR 40572, Oct. 17, 1984]