alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1423.29 Action by the Board. ( a ) After considering the Administrative Law Judge's decision, the record, and any exceptions and related submissions filed, the Board shall issue its decision affirming or reversing the Administrative Law Judge, in whole, or in part, or making such other disposition of the matter as it deems appropriate: *Provided, however,* That unless exceptions are filed which are timely and in accordance with § 1423.27, the Board may, at its discretion, adopt without discussion the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, in which event the findings and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge, as contained in such decision shall, upon appropriate notice to the parties, automatically become the decision of the Board.
( b ) Upon finding a violation, the Board shall issue an order: ( 1 ) To cease and desist from any such unfair labor practice in which the Department or labor organization is engaged;
( 2 ) Requiring the parties to renegotiate a collective bargaining agreement in accordance with the order of the Board and requiring that the agreement, as amended, be given retroactive effect;
( 3 ) Requiring reinstatement of an employee with backpay in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5596; or
( 4 ) Including any combination of the actions described in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section or such other action as will carry out the purpose of the Foreign Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
( c ) Upon finding no violation, the Board shall dismiss the complaint.
(February 8, 1978)

#### In the Matter of Israel Ruiz, Jr., Appellant, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Diana Sanchez et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on February 6, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition validated. We find that there has been substantial compliance with subdivision 2 of section 6-140 of the Election Law. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Evans and Sullivan, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALAN CLARK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 274 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
### §2703. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–644, §16(b), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2330

Section, Pub. L. 90–222, title III, §301, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 728, set out criminal provisions covering operations of antipoverty agencies.
Subpart 3433.1—Protests    **Parent topic:** PART 3433—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS3433.103 Protests to the agency.       (d)(4)(i) All protests to the agency must be submitted to the contracting officer identified in the solicitation. Interested parties may request an independent review of their protest as an alternative to consideration by the contracting officer. If a protest is silent on this matter, the contracting officer will decide the protest. The Department will not consider an appeal of the contracting officer's protest decision.          (ii) If the protester requests an independent review, the HCA will decide the protest. In the event the HCA is not at least one level above the contracting officer, or if the HCA has been substantially involved in the procurement, the SPE will decide the protest.          (iii) Contracting officers must include the provision at 3452.233–70 in solicitations.          (f)(3) The contracting officer's HCA must approve the justification or determination to continue performance.
#### § 9.25 Limited participation of interested persons.

On its own motion or upon motion of any person asserting a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a proceeding conducted under this part, the Commission, in its discretion, may permit the limited participation by such interested person in the proceeding. A motion for leave to participate in the proceeding must identify the interest of that person and must state the reasons why participation in the proceeding by that person is desirable, and must state whether that person requests a copy of the record of the exchange proceeding to the extent permitted by section 8c(a)(2) of the Act and that such person agrees to pay the exchange reasonable fees, as provided in the rules of the exchange, for printing the copy.

[52 FR 25366, July 7, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 5701, Feb. 8, 1994]
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 10, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00748-CV

EX PARTE: ELIZUR GONZAGA

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. X14-399-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Lewis

In a letter dated July 30, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Specifically, there did not appear to be a final judgment. We instructed appellant to file, by 

August 18, 2014, a letter brief addressing our jurisdictional concern. We cautioned appellant 

that failure to file a letter brief within the time requested may result in dismissal of the appeal 

without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a jurisdictional brief. 

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that 

disposes of all pending parties and claims. Id. In appellant’s notice of appeal, he stated that he is 

appealing the trial court’s judgment signed on May 27, 2014. The clerk’s record does not 

contain any such document. It does contain a general denial filed by the District Attorney’s 

Office on that date. The general denial, however, is a pleading, not an appealable order. 
–2–

The record before this Court does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. 

For this reason, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

140748F.P05

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

EX PARTE: ELIZUR GONZAGA

No. 05-14-00748-CV 

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. X14-399-V.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. 

Justices Francis and Myers, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, recover its costs 

of this appeal from appellant, Elizur Gonzaga.

Judgment entered this 10th day of September, 2014.
### §17256. University based research and development grant program

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary, in consultation with other appropriate agencies, shall establish a university based research and development program to study carbon capture and sequestration using the various types of coal.

#### (b) Rural and agricultural institutions

The Secretary shall give special consideration to rural or agricultural based institutions in areas that have regional sources of coal and that offer interdisciplinary programs in the area of environmental science to study carbon capture and sequestration.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are to be authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VII, §708, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1710.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7276

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROGER THEODORE ATWOOD, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-99-44)

Submitted: December 19, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Theodore Atwood, II, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler,

Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the dates

appearing on Atwood’s pleadings are the earliest dates they could

have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Theodore Atwood, II, appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion and

denying reconsideration of that order.

In an action in which the United States is a party, parties

are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court’s final

judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is mandatory and

jurisdictional. Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229

(1960)).

The district court’s order dismissing Atwood’s § 2255 motion

was entered on May 24, 2001. To be timely, Atwood would have had

to note an appeal no later than July 23, 2001. Atwood’s notice of

appeal was filed on July 26, 2001.* Atwood filed his motion to

reconsider pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) more than ten days

after the entry of the district court’s order dismissing his § 2255

motion, so the time period for filing his appeal of that order was

not tolled. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Therefore, Atwood’s
3

appeal is only timely as to the district court’s order denying his

subsequent motion for reconsideration.

This court reviews denial of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion

for abuse of discretion. See NOW v. Operation Rescue, 47 F.3d 667,

669 (4th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and

conclude the district court’s order denying Atwood’s motion for

reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, dismiss

as untimely Atwood's appeal as to the denial of his § 2255 motion,

and dismiss as meritless his appeal as to the order denying reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                                                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial statements of the Company for the period ended March 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. Dollars
                             
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                    17,878
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             46,573
<ALLOWANCES>                               6,268
<INVENTORY>                               22,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          85,184
<PP&E>                                    41,243
<DEPRECIATION>                             4,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           255,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     29,996
<BONDS>                                  134,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     151
<OTHER-SE>                                67,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             255,915
<SALES>                                   41,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          41,653
<CGS>                                     19,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             19,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             334
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              830
<INCOME-TAX>                                 110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          180
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.01
        
 

</TABLE>
§ 1006.450 What action may I take if a primary tier participant fails to disclose the information required under § 1006.335? If you as an agency official determine that a participant failed to disclose information, as required by § 1006.335, at the time it entered into a covered transaction with you, you may— ( a ) Terminate the transaction for material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the transaction; or
( b ) Pursue any other available remedies, including suspension and debarment.
Exhibit 4.3
 Warrant
  1,000,000
 CAPTERRA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
(a Colorado Corporation)
Not Transferable or Exercisable Except
Upon Conditions Herein Specified
Void after 5:00 OClock p.m.,
Mountain Standard Time, on February 25, 2012
 CAPTERRA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. BOCO INVESTMENTS, LLC.
 Exercise of Warrants.




---



##### 



February 25, 2012
 Exchange and Transfer of Warrant.
 Rights and Obligations of Warrant Holder.




---



##### 



Shares Underlying Warrants.
 Disposition of Warrants or Shares.




---



##### 



Adjustments.




---



##### 



Notice to Warrant Holders of Adjustment.
 Fractional Shares.
 Registration Rights.
 Loss or Destruction.
 Survival.
 Notices.




---



##### 



CAPTERRA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ James. W. Creamer, IIIIts:
    
    PresidentDate:
    
    February 25, 2009




---



##### 



PURCHASE FORM
 
  
    BOCO INVESTMENTS, LLC.By:Its:Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4151 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4151

 To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of Bureau of Prisons 
                     land in Leon County, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2012

 Mr. Southerland introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of Bureau of Prisons 
                     land in Leon County, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.

    The Attorney General shall convey, without consideration, to the 
Leon County, Florida (in this Act referred to as the ``recipient''), 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel 
of Bureau of Prisons land in Leon County, Florida, consisting of 
approximately 9.1 acres of undeveloped land bounded by Easterwood Drive 
to the north, Tom Brown Park to the east, from Tom Brown Park to FCI 
Village Road to the south, and extending from FCI Village Road to 
Easterwood Drive to the west.

SEC. 2. CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.

    The conveyance under section 1 shall be subject to the condition 
that the recipient accept the real property described in such section 
in its condition at the time of the conveyance, commonly known as 
conveyance ``as is''.

SEC. 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

    The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be 
conveyed under section 1 shall be determined by a survey satisfactory 
to the Attorney General. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the 
recipient.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    The Attorney General may require such additional terms and 
conditions in connection with the conveyance under section 1 as the 
Attorney General considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
### §2000aa–11. Guidelines for Federal officers and employees

#### (a) Procedures to obtain documentary evidence; protection of certain privacy interests

The Attorney General shall, within six months of October 13, 1980, issue guidelines for the procedures to be employed by any Federal officer or employee, in connection with the investigation or prosecution of an offense, to obtain documentary materials in the private possession of a person when the person is not reasonably believed to be a suspect in such offense or related by blood or marriage to such a suspect, and when the materials sought are not contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of an offense. The Attorney General shall incorporate in such guidelines—

(1) a recognition of the personal privacy interests of the person in possession of such documentary materials;

(2) a requirement that the least intrusive method or means of obtaining such materials be used which do not substantially jeopardize the availability or usefulness of the materials sought to be obtained;

(3) a recognition of special concern for privacy interests in cases in which a search or seizure for such documents would intrude upon a known confidential relationship such as that which may exist between clergyman and parishioner; lawyer and client; or doctor and patient; and

(4) a requirement that an application for a warrant to conduct a search governed by this subchapter be approved by an attorney for the government, except that in an emergency situation the application may be approved by another appropriate supervisory official if within 24 hours of such emergency the appropriate United States Attorney is notified.

#### (b) Use of search warrants; reports to Congress

The Attorney General shall collect and compile information on, and report annually to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the use of search warrants by Federal officers and employees for documentary materials described in subsection (a)(3).

(Pub. L. 96–440, title II, §201, Oct. 13, 1980, 94 Stat. 1882.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.72 Supervision of internal organization.

Members and particularly the Chairman of the Commission should scrutinize continuously its internal organization in order to assure that such organization handles all matters before it efficiently and expeditiously, while recognizing that changing times bring changing emphasis in the administration of the laws.
### §19291. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Clean energy technology

The term "clean energy technology" means a technology that significantly reduces energy use, increases energy efficiency, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, reduces emissions of other pollutants, or mitigates other negative environmental consequences of energy production, transmission or use.

#### (2) Department

The term "Department" means the Department of Energy.

#### (3) Director

The term "Director" means the Director of each National Laboratory and the Director of each Department of Energy single-purpose research facility.

#### (4) Economically distressed area

The term "economically distressed area" has the meaning described in section 3161(a) of this title.

#### (5) Grant

The term "grant" means a grant award, cooperative agreement award, or any other financial assistance arrangement that the Secretary of Energy determines to be appropriate.

#### (6) Institution of higher education

The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given such term in section 1001 of title 20.

#### (7) National Laboratory

The term "National Laboratory" has the meaning given that term in section 15801 of this title.

#### (8) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10701, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1701.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle J (§§10701–10727) of title VI of div. B of Pub. L. 117–167, which is classified principally to this part. For complete classification of subtitle J to the Code, see Tables.
### §13281. Program and solicitation

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall conduct a program to demonstrate electric motor vehicles and the associated equipment of such vehicles, in consultation with the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Program Site Operators, manufacturers, the electric utility industry, and such other persons as the Secretary considers appropriate. Such program shall be—

(1) designed to accelerate the development and use of electric motor vehicles; and

(2) structured to evaluate the performance of such electric motor vehicles in field operation, including fleet operation, and evaluate the necessary supporting infrastructure.

#### (b) Solicitation

(1) Not later than 18 months after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals to demonstrate electric motor vehicles and associated equipment in one or more eligible metropolitan areas. The Secretary may make additional solicitations for proposals if the Secretary determines that such solicitations are necessary to carry out this part.

(2)(A) Solicitations for proposals under this subsection shall require the proposer to include a description, including the manufacturer or manufacturers of the electric motor vehicles; the proposed users of the electric motor vehicles; the eligible metropolitan area or areas involved; the number of electric motor vehicles to be demonstrated and their type, characteristics, and life-cycle costs; the price differential; the proposed discount payment; the contributions of State or local governments and other persons to the demonstration project; the type of associated equipment to be demonstrated; the domestic content of the electric motor vehicles and associated equipment; and any other information the Secretary considers appropriate.

(B) If the proposal includes a lease arrangement, the proposal shall indicate the terms of such lease arrangement for the electric motor vehicles or associated equipment.

(3) The solicitation for proposals under this subsection shall establish a closing date for receipt of proposals. The Secretary may, if necessary, extend the closing date for receipt of proposals for a period not to exceed 90 days.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title VI, §611, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2900.)
3428.311-2 Agency solicitation and contract clauses.       The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.228–70 (Required insurance) in all solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3428.3—Insurance