alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1305.4 Factors to be considered by the General Counsel. ( a ) In deciding whether to authorize the release of official information or the testimony of employees concerning official information, the General Counsel shall consider the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the demand is unduly burdensome;
( 2 ) MCC's ability to maintain impartiality in conducting its business;
( 3 ) Whether the time and money of the United States would be used for private purposes;
( 4 ) The extent to which the time of employees for conducting official business would be compromised;
( 5 ) Whether the public might misconstrue variances between personal opinions of employees and MCC policy;
( 6 ) Whether the demand demonstrates that the information requested is relevant and material to the action pending, genuinely necessary to the proceeding, unavailable from other sources, and reasonable in its scope;
( 7 ) Whether the number of similar demands would have a cumulative effect on the expenditure of agency resources;
( 8 ) Whether disclosure otherwise would be inappropriate under the circumstances; and
( 9 ) Any other factor that is appropriate.
( b ) Among those demands in response to which compliance will not ordinarily be authorized are those with respect to which any of the following factors exists: ( 1 ) The disclosure would violate a statute, Executive order, or regulation;
( 2 ) The integrity of the administrative and deliberative processes of MCC would be compromised;
( 3 ) The disclosure would not be appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose;
( 4 ) The disclosure, including release in camera, is not appropriate or necessary under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege;
( 5 ) The disclosure, except when in camera and necessary to assert a claim of privilege, would reveal information properly classified or other matters exempt from unrestricted disclosure; or
( 6 ) The disclosure would interfere with ongoing enforcement proceedings, compromise constitutional rights, reveal the identity of an intelligence source or confidential informant, or disclose trade secrets or similarly confidential commercial or financial information.
Searched for **https://anstaskforce.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://anstaskforce.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2019 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery
of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection
therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from June 12, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                     
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                     
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
#### Marie A. Joseph, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, and City of New York, Defendant.

[716 NYS2d 600]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated October 6, 1999, as denied its motion, *inter alia,*pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that on a motion for summary judgment, the movant is required to set forth evidence establishing its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. A failure to do so requires the denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers *(see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853; *Guck v Palozzi,*269 AD2d 777; *cf., Pamas v Dickson,*267 AD2d 219). Given the appellant’s failure of proof, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
§ 1004.8 Transcripts, recording of closed meetings. ( a ) The IAF shall maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording adequate to record fully the proceedings of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, except that in the case of a meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public pursuant to paragraph (d), (h), or (j) of § 1004.4, the IAF shall maintain either such a transcript or recording, or a set of minutes. Such records shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed and shall provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons therefore, including a description of each of the views expressed on any item and the record of any roll call vote (reflecting the vote of each member on the question). All documents considered in connection with any action shall be identified in such records.
( b ) The IAF, after review by the General Counsel shall make promptly available to the public, in a place easily accessible to the public, the transcript or electronic recording or minutes of the discussion of any time on the agenda, or any item of the testimony of any witness received at the Board meeting, except for such item or items of such discussion or testimony as the IAF determines to contain information which may be withheld under § 1004.4. Copies of such transcript, or a transcription of such recording disclosing the identity of each speaker, shall be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication or transcription. The IAF shall maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes or a complete electronic recording of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, for a period of at least two years after such meeting, or until one year after the conclusion or any IAF proceedings with respect to which the meeting or portion was held, whichever occurs later.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joel Marcus, (Acting) Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joel Marcus
   ----------------
    Joel Marcus
    Chief Financial Officer
    November 22, 2004
Skip to main content    

**

## User account menu

Annual ReportsLoginContact UsSearchFacebookTwitterYouTubeInstagram

                      -        About Uscirf      -        Frequently Asked Questions     
-        Commissioners     
-        Former Commissioners     
-        Staff     
-        Authorizing Legislation     
-        Employment Opportunities     
-        Contract Opportunities     
-        Other Resources     
 
                      -        Countries      -        2024 Recommendations     
-        Afghanistan     
-        Algeria     
-        Azerbaijan     
-        Burma     
-        China     
-        Cuba     
-        Egypt     
-        Eritrea     
-        India     
-        Indonesia     
-        Iran     
-        Iraq     
-        Kazakhstan     
-        Kyrgyzstan     
-        Malaysia     
-        Nicaragua     
-        Nigeria     
-        North Korea     
-        Pakistan     
-        Russia     
-        Saudi Arabia     
-        Sri Lanka     
-        Syria     
-        Tajikistan     
-        Turkey     
-        Turkmenistan     
-        Uzbekistan     
-        Vietnam     
-        Others      -        Bahrain     
-        Laos     
-        Sudan     
-        Central African Republic     
-        Others     
 
 
                      -        News Room      -        Press Releases & Statements     
-        Op-Eds     
-        USCIRF Spotlight Podcast     
-        Media Inquiries     
 
                      -        Events      -        USCIRF Hearings     
-        Other USCIRF Events     
-        Congressional Hearings     
 
                      -        FoRB Victims List      -        Frank R. Wolf Freedom of Religion or Belief Victims List     
-        Country Profiles     
-        Defending Freedoms Project     
 
                      -        Publications     
                      -        Annual Reports 
                      -        Contact Us     
                      -        Facebook     
                      -        Twitter     
                      -        YouTube     
                      -        Instagram     
                      -        Search     

# Publications 

Sinicization of Religion: China’s Coercive Religious Policy
September 23, 2024
View PDF

Revisiting the CPC Designation
September 06, 2024
View PDF

Cuba Country Update
September 06, 2024
View PDF

Nigeria Country Update
August 09, 2024
View PDF

Misinformation and Disinformation: Implications for Freedom of Religion of Belief 
August 08, 2024
View PDF

Afghanistan Country Update
August 07, 2024
View PDF

Saudi Arabia Country Update
August 01, 2024
View PDF

Turkey Country Update
July 26, 2024
View PDF

Nicaragua Country Update
June 28, 2024
View PDF

Sri Lanka Country Update
June 27, 2024
View PDF

#### Pagination

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
- …
-  Next ›Next page 
-  Last »Last page 

United States Commission on International Religious Freedom

732 N. Capitol Street, N.W., Suite A714 Washington, D.C. 20401

Phone:				(202) 523-3240

Email:				[email protected]

## Footer

-  Contact Us 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Sitemap
### §2000cc–1. Protection of religious exercise of institutionalized persons

#### (a) General rule

No government shall impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution, as defined in section 1997 of this title, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person—

(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and

(2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.

#### (b) Scope of application

This section applies in any case in which—

(1) the substantial burden is imposed in a program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance; or

(2) the substantial burden affects, or removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes.

(Pub. L. 106–274, §3, Sept. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 804.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, FOR THE THREE MONTHS IN
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          94,177
<SECURITIES>                                     5,027
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,247
<INVENTORY>                                    213,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               633,192
<PP&E>                                         247,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,362,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          287,037
<BONDS>                                        263,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           988
<OTHER-SE>                                     695,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,362,017
<SALES>                                        426,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,509
<CGS>                                          126,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  461,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,526)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (77,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DICOM Standards Committee

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DICOM Standards Committee 
(``DICOM''), by its Secretariat, the National Electrical Manufacturers 
Association (``NEMA''), has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: DICOM 
Standards Committee, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of DICOM's 
standards development activities are: To develop and maintain the DICOM 
(``Digital Communications in Medicine'') Standard, an international 
standard for communication of biomedical diagnostic and therapeutic 
information in disciplines that use digital images and associated data. 
The goals of DICOM are to achieve compatibility and to improve workflow 
efficiency between imaging systems and other information systems in 
healthcare environments worldwide. The standards developed by DICOM are 
published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26623 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.10a-2 General requirements as to form and content of applications.

Rule 5a-2 (§ 260.5a-2 of this chapter) and rules 7a-15 through 7a-37 [§§ 260.7a-15 through 260.7a-37 of this chapter] under section 307 of the Act shall be applicable to applications on Form T-6 pursuant to section 310(a)(1) of the Act and Rule 10a-1 (§ 260.10a-1 of this chapter).

[56 FR 22320, May 15, 1991]
§ 44.00 Definition of terms used in part 44 of this chapter. ( a ) *Major swap participant* shall have the meaning provided in Section 1a(33) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and any rules or regulations thereunder.
( b ) *Pre-enactment unexpired swap* means any swap entered into prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 (July 21, 2010) the terms of which had not expired as of the date of enactment of that Act;
( c ) Transition swap means any swap entered into after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 (July 21, 2010) and prior to the effective date of the swap data reporting and recordkeeping rule implemented under Section 2(h)(5)(B) of the CEA.
( d ) *Reporting entity,* when used in this part, means any counterparty referenced or identified in Section 4r(a)(3)(A)-(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended;
( e ) *Swap Data Repository* shall have the meaning provided in Section 1a(48) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and any rules or regulations thereunder;
( f ) *Swap Dealer* shall have the meaning provided in Section 1(a)(49) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and any rules or regulations thereunder;
[75 FR 63084, Oct. 14, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 78896, Dec. 17, 2010]
#### § 1429.10 Advisory opinions.

The Board and the General Counsel will not issue advisory opinions.
538.000 Scope of part.

(a)This part prescribes policies and procedures for contracting for supplies and services under the

Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program. GSA may delegate certain responsibilities for other agency

acquisition programs as they relate to the establishment of individual federal supply schedules.

(b)The authority of other agencies to award FSS contracts can only be accomplished through

delegation from GSA. An agency delegated authority by GSA to award contracts under the FSS

program is responsible for complying with GSA regulations and policies that apply to the FSS

program, unless an exception is approved by GSA (see 538.001).

Parent topic: Part 538 - Federal Supply Schedule Contracting
#### § 243.102 No effect on antifraud liability.

No failure to make a public disclosure required solely by § 243.100 shall be deemed to be a violation of Rule 10b-5 (17 CFR 240.10b-5) under the Securities Exchange Act.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the forthcoming meeting of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. The purpose of the meeting is to present and discuss the findings of the 2004 Science and Technology Quality Review of Air Force Research Laboratory programs. Because classified and contractor-proprietary information will be discussed, this meeting will be closed to the public. 

# DATES:

January 19, 2005. 

# ADDRESS:

1670 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4E916, Washington, DC 20330-1670. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Major Kyle Gresham, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat, 1180 Air Force Pentagon, Rm 5D982, Washington, DC 20330-1180, (703) 697-4808. 

Albert F. Bodnar,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-27276 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4888

_____________________________
H ERBERT L EE B UTLER ,
Petitioner
,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of C ertiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

March 5, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

M AKAR , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authori zed motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Herbert Lee Butler, pro se
, Petitioner

. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13b2-1 Falsification of accounting records.

No person shall directly or indirectly, falsify or cause to be falsified, any book, record or account subject to section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act.

(15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(2); 15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78m(b)(1), 78o(d), 78j(b), 78n(a), 78t(b), 78t(c))

[44 FR 10970, Feb. 23, 1979]
§ 38.601 Mandatory clearing. ( a ) Transactions executed on or through the designated contract market must be cleared through a Commission-registered derivatives clearing organization, in accordance with the provisions of part 39 of this chapter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, transactions in security futures products executed on or through the designated contract market may alternatively be cleared through a clearing agency, registered pursuant to section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
( b ) A designated contract market must coordinate with each derivatives clearing organization to which it submits transactions for clearing, in the development of rules and procedures to facilitate prompt and efficient transaction processing in accordance with the requirements of § 39.12(b)(7) of this chapter.
[77 FR 36700, June 19, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 37803, June 25, 2012]