alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18825; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-51]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Harrisonville, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Harrisonville, MO.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 8, 2004 
(69 FR 60285). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 8, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-26099 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
FLORIDA'S DEP DENIES
                              COASTAL PETE PERMITS


         APALACHICOLA,  FL,  March 26,  1998 - Coastal  Petroleum  Company  said
Florida's  Department of Environmental  Protection has denied 12 drilling permit
applications submitted by Coastal last year.
'
         The Company,  which has an  800,000-acre  offshore  leasehold along the
Gulf Coast,  said the agency's action is unrelated to Coastal's 1992 application
for a permit off St. George's Island, now awaiting a ruling by an administrative
law judge expected early next month.

         A Coastal  spokesman  said the agency  rejected  the 1997  applications
because they allegedly were incomplete,  and noted that an administrative appeal
will be filed promptly.

         Coastal  Petroleum  Company is a  majority-held  subsidiary  of Coastal
Caribbean  Oils & Minerals,  Ltd. (Boston:  CCO-B; CCO-BN).




                   Contact: Phillip W. Ware, at (904) 653-2732
#### § 38.156 Automated trade surveillance system.

A designated contract market must maintain an automated trade surveillance system capable of detecting and investigating potential trade practice violations. The automated system must load and process daily orders and trades no later than 24 hours after the completion of the trading day. In addition, the automated trade surveillance system must have the capability to detect and flag specific trade execution patterns and trade anomalies; compute, retain, and compare trading statistics; compute trade gains, losses, and futures-equivalent positions; reconstruct the sequence of market activity; perform market analyses; and support system users to perform in-depth analyses and ad hoc queries of trade-related data.
### §14043b–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §41105, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §107, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2984, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2007 to 2011, was omitted as obsolete.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v William Steele, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 665]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), entered June 17, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion denied and the indictment reinstated.

The radio communication from the testifying officer, who possessed probable cause to stop the person “on the bike running,” and the defendant’s apprehension by two fellow officers “literally” seconds later was sufficient to establish probable cause for the arrest *(see People v Rosario,*78 NY2d 583, 588 [1991], *cert denied*502 US 1109 [1992]; *see also People v Gonzalez,*91 NY2d 909, 910 [1998]; *People v Destine,*216 AD2d 127 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 900 [1995]). The officer’s testimony, along with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, met the People’s burden of establishing the content of the description. Concur— Buckley, P.J, Andrias, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Microarray Consortium.                     

*Date:*                         December 8, 2004.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         The Jefferson Hotel, 1200 Sixteenth Street, NW., Washington DC, 20036.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Richard D. Crosland, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 594-0635,                         *rc218u@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26888  Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §1862o–12. Hispanic-serving institutions undergraduate program

#### (a) In general

The Director shall award grants on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis to Hispanic-serving institutions (as defined in section 1101a of title 20) to enhance the quality of undergraduate STEM education at such institutions and to increase the retention and graduation rates of students pursuing associate's or baccalaureate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

#### (b) Program components

Grants awarded under this section shall support—

(1) activities to improve courses and curriculum in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics;

(2) faculty development;

(3) stipends for undergraduate students participating in research; and

(4) other activities consistent with subsection (a), as determined by the Director.

#### (c) Instrumentation

Funding for instrumentation is an allowed use of grants awarded under this section.

(Pub. L. 110–69, title VII, §7033, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 711; Pub. L. 114–329, title III, §315(a), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 3016.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Act, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–329 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Director is authorized to establish a new program to award grants on a competitive, merit-reviewed basis to Hispanic-serving institutions (as defined in section 1101a of title 20) to enhance the quality of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at such institutions and to increase the retention and graduation rates of students pursuing associate's or baccalaureate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 114–329, title III, §315(b), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 3016, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) of this section [amending this section] shall not affect any award of a grant or other form of financial assistance made under section 7033 of the America COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 1862o–12) before the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 6, 2017]. Such awards shall continue to be subject to the requirements to which such funds were subject under that section before the date of enactment of this Act."

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 7001 of Pub. L. 110–69, set out as a note under section 1862o of this title.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies, Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002 (the Report).

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 14th day of November 2002.



                                                 /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
### §15485. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15485 was editorially reclassified as section 21085 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00809- CR

P aul B oris G olceff, Ap pellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 207 th J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR2013 -05 2, H ONO RAB LE R. B RUCE B OY ER, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R P ER CURIAM

I n the above cause , the State’s brief was ori g inally due on J uly 23, 2014, and the State has been g rante d one 90-day extension. The State has now filed a second motion for extension of time, seeking an additional 30 day s to file the brief, which woul d m ak e t h e brief due on November 20, 2 0 1 4
. W e grant the motion, extending the deadline to the following Monday , November

24, 2014. No furthe r extensions will be grante d. I t is ordere d November

13, 2014.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Do Not Publish
#### Helen Schiff, Appellant, v. Alvee Sportswear Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. New York Credit Men’s Adjustment Bureau, Inc., as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Alvee Sportswear Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Helen Schiff et al., Appellants.

Although the counterclaim cannot be sustained on the theory that plaintiff Schiff’s lien became null and void by reason of subdivision a of section 67 of the Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 107, subd. [a]) because it attached within four months of the date when the petition in bankruptcy was filed, nevertheless it does state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for conversion. The defense also is sufficient. The *750denials, in the answer, of the allegations of the supplemental complaint as to lack of consideration and failure to give notice to creditors are, by virtue of rule 90 of the Buies of Civil Practice, given effect in the defense. The time to plead to the counterclaim is extended to twenty days after the entry of the order hereon. Subdivision a of section 67 of the Bankruptcy Act, and *Schwarts*v. *Armstrong Co.*(179 F. 2d 766), relied upon by the trustee and Special Term, are not applicable here. The levy was made within four months of the filing of the petition; but the trustee pleads that the sale and delivery of the balance of the proceeds of sale, after deduction of expenses and fees, also took place before the filing of the petition. There is no allegation that the sale by the marshal was not in accordance with law or that the purchaser was not a bona fide purchaser. *(Fischer*v. *Pauline Oil Co.,*309 U. S. 294; *Levor*v. *Seiter,*69 App. Div. 33; *Botts*V. *Hammond,*99 F. 916; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy [14th ed.], pp. 126-128, 141-142; 4 Bemington on Bankruptcy [5th ed.], p. 391.) However, the counterclaim pleads ownership by the bankrupt at the time the sale was made. There is no admission that no notice was given to creditors of the transferrer. If the transfer to the bankrupt was not made in violation of section 44 of the Personal Property Law or otherwise in fraud of creditors, it had a right of action for conversion which has passed to the trustee. It is to be noted that in the present state of the pleadings it cannot be held, nor is it urged by appellants, that the notice of claim of ownership complied with section 696 of the Civil Practice Act, and that therefore no cause of action lies against the marshal and the surety company unless brought as provided in section 697 of the Civil Practice Act. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 275.0-2 General procedures for serving non-residents. ( a ) *General procedures for serving process, pleadings, or other papers on non-resident investment advisers, general partners and managing agents.* Under Forms ADV and ADV-NR [17 CFR 279.1 and 279.4], a person may serve process, pleadings, or other papers on a non-resident investment adviser, or on a non-resident general partner or non-resident managing agent of an investment adviser by serving any or all of its appointed agents: ( 1 ) A person may serve a non-resident investment adviser, non-resident general partner, or non-resident managing agent by furnishing the Commission with one copy of the process, pleadings, or papers, for each named party, and one additional copy for the Commission's records.
( 2 ) If process, pleadings, or other papers are served on the Commission as described in this section, the Secretary of the Commission (Secretary) will promptly forward a copy to each named party by registered or certified mail at that party's last address filed with the Commission.
( 3 ) If the Secretary certifies that the Commission was served with process, pleadings, or other papers pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section and forwarded these documents to a named party pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, this certification constitutes evidence of service upon that party.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Managing agent* means any person, including a trustee, who directs or manages, or who participates in directing or managing, the affairs of any unincorporated organization or association other than a partnership.
( 2 ) *Non-resident* means: ( i ) An individual who resides in any place not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States;
( ii ) A corporation that is incorporated in or that has its principal office and place of business in any place not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and
( iii ) A partnership or other unincorporated organization or association that has its principal office and place of business in any place not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
( 3 ) *Principal office and place of business* has the same meaning as in § 275.203A-3(c) of this chapter.
[65 FR 57448, Sept. 22, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Donald R. Mastropietro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
----------------------------------
Donald R. Mastropietro
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 89 FR 71806, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### §§ 3.5-3.9 [Reserved]
No. 15-086 December 17, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Elects 2016 Leadership,

Confirms Meeting Schedule

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 

has elected Dennis Bley as Chairman, Michael Corradini as Vice-Chairman and Peter Riccardella as 

Member-at-Large.

The ACRS, a group of experienced technical experts, advises the Commission, independently 

from the NRC staff, on safety issues related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants as 

well as issues of health physics and radiation protection.

The complete listing of the ACRS membership and their bios can be found on the ACRS 

webpage.

The confirmed ACRS 2016 full-committee meeting schedule is available on the NRC website.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: August 19, 2005              By: /s/ Barry Hodkin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Barry Hodkin
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
§ 202.13 Informal procedure with respect to applications under the Investment Company Act of 1940. ( a ) On any application subject to 17 CFR 270.0-5, other than an application eligible for and proceeding under expedited review as provided for by 17 CFR 270.0-5(d), (e), and (f), the Division should take action within 90 days of the initial filing and each of the first three amendments thereto, and within 60 days of any subsequent amendment. Such 90- or 60-day period will stop running upon any irregular closure of the Commission's Washington, DC office to the public for normal business, including, but not limited to, closure due to a lapse in Federal appropriations, national emergency, inclement weather, or ad hoc Federal holiday, and will resume upon the reopening of the Commission's Washington, DC office to the public for normal business. The Division may grant 60-day extensions and the applicant should be notified of any such extension.
( b ) Action on the application or any amendment thereto shall consist of: ( 1 ) Issuing a notice;
( 2 ) Providing the applicant with requests for clarification or modification of the application; or
( 3 ) Informing applicant that the application will be forwarded to the Commission, in which case the application is no longer subject to the provisions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The provisions of this section, including the timeframes provided for in this section, are not intended to create enforceable rights by any interested parties and shall not be deemed to do so. Rather, this section provides informal non-binding guidelines and procedures that the Commission anticipates the Division following.
[85 FR 57107, Sept. 15, 2020]