alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CNA Announces New Member to Board of Directors


CHICAGO, October 13, 2017 - CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE: CNA) announced that Mr. Michael Bless has been appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors, effective October 13, 2017. Mr. Bless will serve on the board's Audit, Compensation and Finance Committees.





Mr. Bless is President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Century Aluminum Company ("Century") (NASDAQ: CENX). He joined Century in 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in November 2011 and elected to the Board of Directors in December 2012.





Mr. Bless serves on the Board of Directors for Simpson Manufacturing Company Inc. and is a National Trustee, Midwest Region for Boys & Girls Club of America.








About CNA


CNA is the eighth largest commercial insurer in the United States. CNA provides a broad range of standard and specialized property and casualty insurance products and services for businesses and professionals in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia, backed by 120 years of experience and more than $45 billion of assets. For more information about CNA visit our website at www.cna.com.





Follow CNA (NYSE: CNA) on: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube





# # #


CONTACT:


Brandon Davis, 312-822-5167 / 312-834-6091


Sarah Pang, 312-822-6394 / 312-607-5544
Temperate Steppe

Subtropical Steppe

Temperate Desert

Marine

Mediterranean

Subtropical Desert

Temperate Steppe

Marine

Subarctic

Tundra

Map 3-1

Ecoregion Divisions

Source: Bailey 1997

Note: Coverage for BLM-administered lands is not available 

 for Texas, Nebraska, or Oklahoma

0 200 400 600 800

Miles

0 100 200 300 400

Miles

3-73

BLM-administered Lands
### §2112. Foreign distribution of byproduct material

#### (a) Cooperation with other Nations

The Commission is authorized to cooperate with any nation by distributing byproduct material, and to distribute byproduct material, pursuant to the terms of an agreement for cooperation to which such nation is party and which is made in accordance with section 2153 of this title.

#### (b) Distribution to individuals

The Commission is also authorized to distribute byproduct material to any person outside the United States upon application therefor by such person and demand such charge for such material as would be charged for the material if it were distributed within the United States: Provided, however, That the Commission shall not distribute any such material to any person under this section if, in its opinion, such distribution would be inimical to the common defense and security: And provided further, That the Commission may require such reports regarding the use of material distributed pursuant to the provisions of this section as it deems necessary.

#### (c) Distributor's license

The Commission is authorized to license others to distribute byproduct material to any person outside the United States under the same conditions, except as to charges, as would be applicable if the material were distributed by the Commission.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §82, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 935; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)
#### § 130.7 Supplier.

*Supplier* means any person who enters into a contract with the Department of Defense for the sale of defense articles or defense services valued in an amount of $500,000 or more under section 22 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2762).
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Annarosa Mozzone, Deceased. Gabriel R. Mozzone, Respondent; Anna J. Mozzone et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
##### 



Exihibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Patrick L. Beach, the President of GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC, the manager of Captec
Franchise Capital Partners L.P. IV (the Partnership), certify that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended March 31,
2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. /s/ Patrick L. BeachPatrick L. BeachPresident
GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLC May 13, 2005
#### Flora M. Nelson, appellee, v. Richard Elmer Nelson, appellant.

Suit for separate maintenance. Cross-bill asking annulment of marriage. Cross-bill dismissed and *decree*for alimony and solicitor’s fees granted. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock county; the Hon. Willis F. Graham, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Williams & Williams and Mack & Mack, for appellant. O’Harra, O’Harra & O’Harra, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Nicia, Appellant.

[819 NYS2d 842]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered August 5, 2004, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Collini, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*544Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the police had reasonable suspicion to detain him for possible identification based on a totality of the circumstances, including a radio transmission providing a general description of the perpetrators of the crime, the brief period of time between the crime and the discovery of the defendant near the scene of the crime, and the detective’s observation of the defendant, who matched the radio-transmitted description of one of the perpetrators *(see People v Hunt,*306 AD2d 497 [2003]; *People v Martinez,*301 AD2d 615 [2003]; *People v Lynch,*285 AD2d 518 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1081 [2002]). Miller, J.P, Adams, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 1006.355 What information must I provide to a higher tier participant before entering into a covered transaction with that participant?

Before you enter into a covered transaction with a person at the next higher tier, you as a lower tier participant must notify that person if you know that you or any of the principals are presently excluded or disqualified.
Exhibit 10.8


GSC CAPITAL CORP 2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT


GSC Capital Corp, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the “Participant” this Award of Restricted Stock pursuant to the GSC Capital Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) upon the following terms and conditions: 

	 Name of Participant:	 
	 	 
        
	 Grant Date:	 
	 	 
        
	 Number of Shares:	 
	 	 
        




	
1.	
This Award is subject to all terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan. The terms of the Plan are hereby incorporated by reference. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such
term in the Plan.        
	 	 
	
2.	
To the extent dividends are paid on Shares covered by this
Award, the Participant shall be entitled to receive such dividends at the time
paid.    
	 	 
	
3.	
The Participant shall be entitled to receive (and the Company shall deliver to the Participant) within 75 days following the date hereof, the number of Shares set forth above.       
	 	 
	
4.	
Notices hereunder and under the Plan, if to the Company, shall be delivered to the Plan Administrator (as so designated by the Company) or mailed to the Company’s principal office, GSC Capital Corp., 500 Campus Drive, Suite
220, Florham Park, NJ 07932, attention of the Plan Administrator, or, if to you, shall be delivered to you or mailed to your address as the same appears on the records of the Company.  
	 	 
	
5.	
All decisions and interpretations made by the Board of Directors or the Committee with regard to any question arising hereunder or under the Plan shall be binding and conclusive on all persons. In the event of any inconsistency
between the terms hereof and the provisions of this Agreement and the Plan, this Agreement shall govern. 
	 	 
	
6.	
By accepting this Award, the Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, as in effect from time to time.     
	 	 
	
7.	
By accepting this Award, the Participant further acknowledges that the federal securities laws and/or the Company’s policies regarding trading in its securities may limit or restrict its right to buy or sell Shares,
including, without limitation, sales of Shares acquired in connection    
	 	 












	 	
with this Award. The Participant agrees to comply with such federal securities law requirements and Company policies, as such laws and policies are amended from time to time.        
	 	 
	
8.	
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of Maryland without giving effect to its choice of law provisions.  
	 	 






	 	
    GSC CAPITAL CORP. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
        
	 	 	

    
	 	Name:	 
        
	 	 	

	 	Title:	 
        
	 	 	

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Participant
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	

	 	Name:	 
	 	 	





  

    2
#### § 38.153 Capacity to detect and investigate rule violations.

A designated contract market must have arrangements and resources for effective enforcement of its rules. Such arrangements must include the authority to collect information and documents on both a routine and non-routine basis, including the authority to examine books and records kept by the designated contract market's members and by persons under investigation. A designated contract market's arrangements and resources must also facilitate the direct supervision of the market and the analysis of data collected to determine whether a rule violation occurred.
Name (Last, First, Middle) Title Company/

Organization

Street Address Phone 

Webinar Attendees: Fluorescent Lamp Ballast ‐ ECS NOPR Meeting

City State/ 

Prov

Zip Country

Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Mechanical Engineer/ ManagerProject Manager Energy & Environment Directorate

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999MSIN K5-22

Andersen, Eric S Richland WA 99352 USA 509-375-2735 N/ACollins, Natasha Research Economist PNNL 620 SW 5th Ave Portland OR 97204 USA N/A N/A 

Senior Engineer Natural Resources Defense 

Council (NRDC)Center for Energy Efficiency Standards

Delforge, Pierre 111 Sutter Street San Francisco CA 94114 USA 415-875-6139 415-Gallant, Pierre Standards Engineer Natural Resources Canada 580 Booth Street Ottawa ON K1A0E4 CAN N/A N/A 

Appliance Standards Program Manager

Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP)

91 Hartwell Avenue 781-860-9177 

x 127

Lis, David Lexington MA O2421 USA 781-

N/A Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory

902 Battle Blvd, P.O.Box 999

Morris, Scott Richland WA 99532 USA 509-372-6454 N/A

N/A PNNC 57 Bedford Street, Suite 

101

Myer, Michael Lexington MA 01760 USA 781-862-2321 N/ARivers, David N/A Southern California Edison 6042 B Irwindale Ave Irwindale CA 91702 USA N/A N/A 

Managing Director Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street NW 

Suite 500

Rivest, Michel Washington DC 20001 USA 202-375-3834 202-Steele, Lindsay Sr. Research Scientist PNNL 5510 W 18th Ave Kennewick WA 99338 USA N/A N/A 

Environmental Scientist New York State Office of the 

Attorney General

Wilson, Linda 120 Broadway New York NY 10271 USA 212-416-8948 212-

Contacts Included: 11 

08/30/2011 12:24:18
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alejandro GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41263

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 17, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jon Karl Schmid, Law Office of Jon Karl Schmid, Brownsville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carlos Alejandro Guerrero appeals the 90-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. Specifically, Guerrero challenges the district court’s order that the sentence be imposed consecutively to an anticipated sentence on a pending drug charge in Hays County, Texas.

Because the argument is raised for the first time on appeal, it is reviewed for plain error only. Guerrero must show that there was a clear or obvious error which affected his substantial rights. *See United States v. Calverley,*37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc).

The district court had the authority to impose Guerrero’s sentence consecutively to a future state-court sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); *United States v. Brown,*920 F.2d 1212, 1217 (5th Cir.1991); *see also United States v. Hernandez,*234 F.3d 252, 256 (5th Cir.2000). Guerrero’s complaint that he was not given notice of the district court’s intention to impose his sentence consecutively to a future state sentence is unavailing as no such notice was required. *See Hernandez,*234 F.3d at 256. His assertion that the district court’s imposition of a consecutive sentence violates the principles of comity is similarly unavailing. *See Leal v. Tombone,*341 F.3d 427, 429 *&*n. 13 (5th Cir.2003). Although Guerrero argues that the imposition of a consecutive sentence is error because the instant case is factually unrelated to the state-court charge, he provides no authority for his contention that the two charges must be related before a consecutive sentence may be imposed. The statute does not require relatedness. § 3584(a).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §1973ff. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973ff was editorially reclassified as section 20301 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
§ 1007.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This regulation provides procedures for the collection by administrative offset of a federal employee's salary without his/her consent to satisfy certain debts owed to the federal government. These regulations apply to all federal employees who owe debts to the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) and to current employees of the Inter-American Foundation who owe debts to other federal agencies. This regulation does not apply when the employee consents to recovery from his/her current pay account.
( b ) This regulation does not apply to debts or claims arising under: ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.;*
( 2 ) The Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.;*
( 3 ) The tariff laws of the United States; or
( 4 ) Any case where a collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute.
( c ) This regulation does not apply to any adjustment to pay arising out of an employee's selection of coverage or a change in coverage under a federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less.
( d ) This regulation does not preclude the compromise, suspension, or termination of collection action where appropriate under the standards implementing the Federal Claims Collection Act, 31 U.S.C. 3711 *et seq.,* 4 CFR parts 101 through 105, 45 CFR part 1177.
( e ) This regulation does not preclude an employee from requesting waiver of an overpayment under 5 U.S.C. 5584, 10 U.S.C. 2774 or 32 U.S.C. 716 or in any way questioning the amount or validity of the debt by submitting a subsequent claim to the General Accounting Office. This regulation does not preclude an employee from requesting a waiver pursuant to other statutory provisions applicable to the particular debt being collected.
( f ) Matters not addressed in these regulations should be reviewed in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.*
### §285c–2. Division Directors for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, and Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases; functions

(a)(1) In the Institute there shall be a Division Director for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, a Division Director for Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, and a Division Director for Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases. Such Division Directors, under the supervision of the Director of the Institute, shall be responsible for—

(A) developing a coordinated plan (including recommendations for expenditures) for each of the national research institutes within the National Institutes of Health with respect to research and training concerning diabetes, endocrine and metabolic diseases, digestive diseases and nutrition, and kidney, urologic, and hematologic diseases;

(B) assessing the adequacy of management approaches for the activities within such institutes concerning such diseases and nutrition and developing improved approaches if needed;

(C) monitoring and reviewing expenditures by such institutes concerning such diseases and nutrition; and

(D) identifying research opportunities concerning such diseases and nutrition and recommending ways to utilize such opportunities.

(2) The Director of the Institute shall transmit to the Director of NIH the plans, recommendations, and reviews of the Division Directors under subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1) together with such comments and recommendations as the Director of the Institute determines appropriate.

(b) The Director of the Institute, acting through the Division Director for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, the Division Director for Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, and the Division Director for Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, shall—

(1) carry out programs of support for research and training (other than training for which Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards may be made under section 288 of this title) in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of diabetes mellitus and endocrine and metabolic diseases, digestive diseases and nutritional disorders, and kidney, urologic, and hematologic diseases, including support for training in medical schools, graduate clinical training, graduate training in epidemiology, epidemiology studies, clinical trials, and interdisciplinary research programs; and

(2) establish programs of evaluation, planning, and dissemination of knowledge related to such research and training.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §428, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 842; amended Pub. L. 103–43, title XX, §2008(b)(4), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 211; Pub. L. 107–206, title I, §804(c), Aug. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 107–206 substituted "Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards" for "National Research Service Awards".

1993—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–43 substituted "the" for "the the" before "Division Director for Diabetes" in introductory provisions.
§ 300.300 Definitions. For the purpose of these rules, adopted pursuant to section 8(e) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, as amended (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”): ( a ) The term *failed to receive* shall mean a contractual commitment of the debtor made in the ordinary course of business to pay to another broker or dealer the contract price in cash upon receipt from such broker or dealer of securities purchased: *Provided,* That the respective obligations of the parties remained outstanding until the close of business on the filing date as defined in section 16(7) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the “filing date”).
( b ) The term *failed to deliver* shall mean a contractual commitment of the debtor, made in the ordinary course of business, to deliver securities to another broker or dealer against receipt from such broker or dealer of the contract price in cash: *Provided,* That the respective obligations of the parties remained outstanding until the close of business on the filing date.
( c ) The term *open contractual commitment* shall mean a failed to receive or a failed to deliver which had a settlement date prior to the filing date and the respective obligations of the parties remained outstanding on the filing date or had a settlement date which occurs on or within three business days subsequent to the filing date: *Provided, however,* That the term “open contractual commitment” shall not include any contractual commitment for which the security which is the subject of the trade had not been issued by the issuer as of the trade date.
( d ) The term *customer* shall mean a person (other than a broker or dealer) in whose behalf a broker or dealer has executed a transaction out of which arose an open contractual commitment with the debtor, but shall not include any person to the extent that such person at the filing date ( 1 ) had a claim for property which by contract, agreement of understanding, or by operation of law, was a part of the capital of the broker or dealer who executed such transaction or was subordinated to the claims of creditors of such broker or dealer, or
( 2 ) had a relationship with the debtor which is specified in section 9(a)(4) of the Act.
[44 FR 21211, Apr. 9, 1979, as amended at 62 FR 10451, Mar. 7, 1997]