alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Glenn M. Parker, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007     By: /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.     Glenn M. Parker, MD    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
### §6908. Parking facility

(a) Title.—The Federal Government has the right, title, and interest in and to the parking facility at Union Station.

(b) Fees.—The rate of fees charged for use of the facility may exceed the rate required for maintenance and operation of the facility. The rate shall be established in a manner that encourages use of the facility by rail passengers and participants in activities in the Union Station complex and area.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1202.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6908(a) | 40:818(a), (b) (1st, 2d sentences). | Pub. L. 90–264, title I, §118, as added Pub. L. 97–125, §3(3), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1672. |
| 6908(b) | 40:818(b) (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 40:818(a) and (b) (1st sentence) is omitted as obsolete.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71801-71802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Force Protection in 
Urban and Unconventional Environments will meet in closed session on 
December 14-16, 2004, at SAI, 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA. 
This Task Force will review and evaluate force protection capabilities 
in urban and unconventional environments and provide recommendations to 
effect change to the future Joint Force.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. Specifically, 
the Task Force's foci will be to evaluate force protection in the 
context of post major combat operations that have been conducted in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. In the operations, loss of national treasure--
military and civilian, U.S. and other nations--has resulted from 
actions executed by non-state and rogue actors. The threat and 
capabilities these insurgent, terrorist and criminal actions present 
post a most serious challenge to our ability to achieve unified action.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been 
determined

[[Page 71802]]

that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these meetings 
will be closed to the public.
    Due to scheduling difficulties, there is insufficient time to 
provide timely notice required by Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-6.1015(b) of the GSA Final 
Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 101-6, which 
further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the 
meeting.

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-27120 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
SUBJ: Permits with Oil and Grease Requirements and Potential Burden to States and 

Control Authorities Associated With ASTM D-7575 

FROM: Robin Oshiro 

TO: Record

DATE: 05 February 2013 

In considering promulgating ASTM D-7575 as an alternative oil and grease method in 40 CFR 

Part 136, EPA reviewed information available in Integrated Compliance Information System 

(ICIS)/Permit Compliance System (PCS) and conducted outreach to states and pretreatment 

coordinators to better understand the breadth of existing oil and grease requirements. EPA 

requested information from states and control authorities on the number of indirect dischargers 

having oil and grease limits, and the number of these where limits in excess of 200 mg/L. Two 

hundred mg/L was specified in the query because that is the upper range of the ASTM D7575 

method under consideration whereas the upper range of the approved 40 CFR Part 136 methods 

is 1,000 mg/L. 

Additionally, as part of its consideration of ASTM D-7575 and as detailed further in the Federal 

Register Notice, EPA also considered a novel approach in which it would approve ASTM D7575 

as an alternative oil and grease method in Part 136 with a requirement to demonstrate 

comparability (side-by-side data) to the permitting authority. As part of the aforementioned 

outreach, EPA also requested information on the State and Regional burden if we were to adopt 

such an approach. 

The attachments to this memo include information received from this effort.

1

The definition of “Significant Industrial Users” includes those subject to effluent guidelines and 

standards (PSES & PSNS) process flows > 25,000 gallons per day, process flows >5% of the organic or dry 

weather capacity of the receiving POTW.
§ 201.155 Default; motion to set aside default. ( a ) A party to a proceeding may be deemed to be in default and the Commission or the hearing officer may determine the proceeding against that party upon consideration of the record, including the order instituting proceedings, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true, if that party fails: ( 1 ) To appear, in person or through a representative, at a hearing or conference of which that party has been notified;
( 2 ) To answer, to respond to a dispositive motion within the time provided, or otherwise to defend the proceeding; or
( 3 ) To cure a deficient filing within the time specified by the commission or the hearing officer pursuant to § 201.180(b).
( b ) A motion to set aside a default shall be made within a reasonable time, state the reasons for the failure to appear or defend, and specify the nature of the proposed defense in the proceeding. In order to prevent injustice and on such conditions as may be appropriate, the hearing officer, at any time prior to the filing of the initial decision, or the Commission, at any time, may for good cause shown set aside a default.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4186 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4186

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the provision of law 
  preventing certain State and local employees from seeking elective 
                    office, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2012

  Mr. Nugent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the provision of law 
  preventing certain State and local employees from seeking elective 
                    office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Allowing Qualified Local Employees 
to Serve Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES TO SEEK ELECTIVE OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1502 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ``or'' after the 
                semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``purposes; or'' 
                and inserting ``purposes.''; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section repealed.--Section 1503 of title 5, United 
        States Code, is repealed.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The item relating to section 1503, 
        in the table of sections for chapter 15 of title 5, United 
        States Code, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
No: IV-15-022 August 12, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at

Arkansas Nuclear One

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Andy Barrett as 

the new Resident Inspector at Arkansas Nuclear One in Russellville, Ark.

“Andy Barrett’s technical experience and regulatory perspective will 

assist the NRC in carrying out its mission to protect people and the 

environment by ensuring the safe operation of Arkansas Nuclear One,” said 

NRC Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

Barrett joined the NRC in 2003. He served as a Resident Inspector at 

the Grand Gulf and River Bend nuclear power plants. He graduated from 

Texas A&M University with a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering in 

1997.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two Resident Inspectors. Barrett joins 

Senior Resident Inspector Brian Tindell and Resident Inspector Margaret Tobin at the site. They serve 

as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work 

projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Arkansas Nuclear One Resident Inspectors can be reached at 479-968-3290.
### §247d–7. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title II, §2231(b), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5753

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §319G, as added Pub. L. 106–505, title I, §102, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2323; amended Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, related to demonstration programs to enhance bioterrorism training, coordination, and readiness.
#### Howe Sound Company v. Greg-Gary Corporation.

Motion for an order permitting defendant-appellant to add its appeal to the September 27, 1960 Calendar of this court and for other relief granted as hereinafter set forth unless plaintiff-respondent shall deliver to the attorney for defendant-appellant on or before September 23, 1960, at 2:00 p.m. an amendment in proper form by Philadelphia National Bank of its letter of credit No. 98827 extending the negotiability thereof through October 30, 1960; and in that event this appeal shall be heard on the October 18, 1960 Non-Enumerated Calendar *933of this court. In the event that said amendment to said letter of credit shall not be so delivered then the printing of the appellant’s and respondent’s points is dispensed with and the appeal is permitted to be heard upon typewritten points; the defendant-appellant shall serve one typewritten copy of its points upon the attorney for the plaintiff-respondent and file six typewritten copies of its points, together with the printed record on appeal, with this court on or before September 23, 1960, at 3:00 p.m. with notice of argument for September 27, 1960. Respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before September 26, 1960. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
§ 38.155 Compliance staff and resources. ( a ) *Sufficient compliance staff.* A designated contract market must establish and maintain sufficient compliance department resources and staff to ensure that it can conduct effective audit trail reviews, trade practice surveillance, market surveillance, and real-time market monitoring. The designated contract market's compliance staff also must be sufficient to address unusual market or trading events as they arise, and to conduct and complete investigations in a timely manner, as set forth in § 38.158(b) of this part.
( b ) *Ongoing monitoring of compliance staff resources.* A designated contract market must monitor the size and workload of its compliance staff annually, and ensure that its compliance resources and staff are at appropriate levels. In determining the appropriate level of compliance resources and staff, the designated contract market should consider trading volume increases, the number of new products or contracts to be listed for trading, any new responsibilities to be assigned to compliance staff, the results of any internal review demonstrating that work is not completed in an effective or timely manner, and any other factors suggesting the need for increased resources and staff.
EXHIBIT 4.14
                                                                    ------------


         AMENDMENT to the Finders Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of April
25, 2005, by and between Western Power & Equipment Corp. (the "Company") and
Olympus Securities, LLC ("AGENT").

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:

                  1. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have
the meanings given such terms in the Agreement.

                  2. Section 4.2 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety
by the following:

                  "In addition to the foregoing, upon consummation of a
Transaction, the Company will issue to AGENT warrants (the "Warrants") to
purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Warrants shall be
purchased for a nominal sum and shall be exercisable for a period of five years
from the date of closing with an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The terms of
the Warrants shall be set forth in an agreement (the "Warrant Agreement") in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to AGENT and the Company."

                  3. Section 4.4 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety
by the following:

                  "As used herein, the term "Transaction Amount" shall mean
$32,000,000, the sum raised in the Transaction from the Entities introduced to
the Company by the AGENT."

                  4. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 are hereby deleted and replaced in
their entirety  by the following:

                  "As used herein, "Transaction" means the purchase by the
Entities of certain securities of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of
$32,000,000 under a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into by and among the
Company and such Entities dated as of June 8, 2005."

                  5. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain
unmodified and is hereby ratified in all respects.

                  6. This Amendment may be executed and delivered (including by
facsimile transmission) in one or more counterparts, and by the different
parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed and
delivered shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together
shall constitute one and the same agreement.

             [the balance of this page is intentionally left blank]


<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the AGENT have executed this Amendment as of
the 20th day of January, 2006.



WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT CORP.

By:
    -----------------------------------
Name:  C. Dean McLain
Title: Chief Executive Officer



OLYMPUS SECURITIES, LLC

By:
    -----------------------------------
Name:  Jeffrey Berman
Title: Partner
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies, Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 14th day of May 2003.



                                              /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                              ------------------------
                                              Name: Richard C. Ford
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Alison L. May, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005 of RedEnvelope,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]; andc. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: November 15, 2005   *By: /s/ ALISON L. MAY*  *Alison L. May*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on November 17, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Philip M. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Philip M. Cohen
-------------------------------------
Philip M. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
November 17, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.