alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 337 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 337

To amend Public Law 111-321 (Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010) 
to impose an additional condition on the repeal of the policy codified 
            as section 654 of title 10, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2011

  Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Davis of 
Kentucky, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
Mr. Pearce, Mr. West, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Bartlett, 
   Mr. Conaway, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Kline, Mr. 
 Manzullo, and Mr. Gingrey of Georgia) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend Public Law 111-321 (Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010) 
to impose an additional condition on the repeal of the policy codified 
            as section 654 of title 10, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restore Military Readiness Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL CONDITION ON REPEAL OF DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL POLICY.

    Effective as of December 22, 2010, and as if included therein as 
enacted, section 2(b) of Public Law 111-321 (124 Stat. 3516) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) The Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval 
        Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the Chief 
        of Staff of the Air Force each submit to the congressional 
        defense committees the officer's written certification that 
        repeal of section 654 of title 10, United States Code, will not 
        degrade the readiness, effectiveness, cohesion, and morale of 
        combat arms units and personnel of the Armed Force under the 
        officer's jurisdiction engaged in combat, deployed to a combat 
        theater, or preparing for deployment to a combat theater.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 145.0 Definitions. For the purposes of part 145 the following definitions are applicable: ( a ) *FOIA Compliance Staff* —refers to the Freedom of Information Act compliance staff assigned to respond to requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) *Public records* —in addition to the records described in § 145.1 (material published in the Federal Register) and in § 145.2 (records required to be made publicly available under the Freedom of Information Act), includes those records that have been determined by the Commission to be generally available to the public directly upon oral or written request from the Commission office or division responsible for the maintenance of such records. A compilation of Commission records routinely available to the public upon request appears in appendix A to this part 145.
( c ) *Nonpublic records* —are records not identified in § 145.1, § 145.2, or appendix A of this part 145. Nonpublic records must be requested, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of § 145.7.
( d ) *Record* —is any information or agency record maintained by the Commission in any format, including an electronic format. It includes any document, writing, photograph, sound or magnetic recording, videotape, microfiche, drawing, or computer-stored information or output in the possession of the Commission. The term “record” does not include personal convenience materials over which the Commission has no control, such as appointment calendars and handwritten notes, which may be retained or destroyed at an employee's discretion.
[82 FR 28003, June 20, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 71817, Sept. 4, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,442
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,993,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,482
<PP&E>                                        2781,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,510,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,885,618
<BONDS>                                      1,057,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,344,171
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,908,605)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,510,439
<SALES>                                        514,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               514,955
<CGS>                                          466,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               454,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             246,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (652,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (652,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:


|    |                                                                                                            
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-224699) and in the related Prospectuses of The Clorox Company, and




|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Registration Statements  (Form S-8 Nos. 33-56563, 33-56565, 33-41131, including post effective amendments No. 1 and No. 2, 333-16969, 333-29375, 333-44675, 333-69455, including post effective amendment No. 1, 333-86783, 333-90386, including the post effective amendment No. 1, 333-131487, 333-193913 and 333-213161) of The Clorox Company;

of our reports dated August 13, 2019 , with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Clorox Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Clorox Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of The Clorox Company for the year ended June 30, 2019 .


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Francisco, CA


August 13, 2019
Harvest for this publication is found in ~/gpo123707
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.16b-8 Voting trusts.

Any acquisition or disposition of an equity security or certificate representing equity securities involved in the deposit or withdrawal from a voting trust or deposit agreement shall be exempt from section 16(b) of the Act if substantially all of the assets held under the voting trust or deposit agreement immediately after the deposit or immediately prior to the withdrawal consisted of equity securities of the same class as the security deposited or withdrawn: *Provided, however,* That this exemption shall not apply if there is a non-exempt purchase or sale of an equity security of the class deposited within six months (including the date of withdrawal or deposit) of a non-exempt sale or purchase, respectively, of any certificate representing such equity security (other than the actual deposit or withdrawal).
#### Henry R. Wixom, Respondent, v. Lewis W. Ervay, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Kiley, J., not sitting.
§ 400.6 Notice of withdrawal from business as a government securities broker or dealer by a financial institution. ( a ) Whenever a financial institution that is a government securities broker or dealer that is not exempt from the notice requirements of section 15C(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-5(a)(1)(B)(i)) and of § 400.5 pursuant to part 401 of this chapter, ceases to act as a government securities broker or dealer, it shall file with the appropriate regulatory agency notice of such cessation on Form G-FINW (§ 449.2 of this chapter) in accordance with the instructions contained therein.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a notice that a financial institution has ceased to act as a government securities broker or dealer shall become effective for all purposes on the 60th day after the filing thereof with the appropriate regulatory agency or within such shorter period of time as the appropriate regulatory agency determines.
( c ) If the notice described in paragraph (a) of this section is filed with the appropriate regulatory agency any time after the date of the issuance of a notice or order by the appropriate regulatory agency instituting proceedings pursuant to section 15C(c)(2)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-5(c)(2)(A)) to censure, suspend, limit, or bar from acting as a government securities broker or government securities dealer the entity filing such notice, or if the appropriate regulatory agency has instituted any action against the entity filing such notice pursuant to section 15C(2)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 78o-5(c)(2)(B)), the notice shall become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section at such time and upon such terms and conditions as the appropriate regulatory agency deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of investors.
( d ) Every notice filed pursuant to this section shall constitute a “report” within the meaning of sections 15, 15C and 32(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o, 78o-5, 78ff(a)).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1535-0089) [52 FR 27926, July 24, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 18734, Apr. 13, 1995]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0144:  Proposed Plan for Closing Remaining Fukushima Tier 2 and 3 Recommendations

Accession Number: ML16286A586

Date Released: Friday, January 13, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16286A552 - SECY-16-0144:  Proposed Resolution of Remaining Fukushima Tier 2 and 3 Recommendations (7 page(s), 12/29/2016)
    - ML16286A561 - SECY-16-0144:  Enclosure 1 - Proposed Resolution of Remaining Fukushima Tier 2 and 3 Recommendations, Other Natural Hazards Assessment (30 page(s), 12/29/2016)
    - ML16286A569 - SECY-16-0144:  Enclosure 2 - Proposed Resolution of Remaining Fukushima Tier 2 and 3 Recommendations, Recommendation 2.2: Plan to Ensure Ongoing Assessment of Natural Hazard Information (11 page(s), 12/29/2016)
    - ML16286A583 - SECY-16-0144:  Enclosure 3 - Proposed Resolution of Remaining Fukushima Tier 2 and 3 Recommendations, Real-Time Radiation Monitoring (18 page(s), 12/29/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of PetCARE Television Network, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, Donald R. Mastropietro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
--------------------------
Donald R. Mastropietro
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 1037.

#### Madison et al. *v.*Phillips Petroleum Co.

June 1, 1937.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and mo*704tion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.

*Mr. James O. Cade*for petitioners. No appearance for respondents.
### §2000g–3. Reports to Congress

Subject to the provisions of sections 2000a–4 and 2000g–2(b) of this title, the Director shall, on or before January 31 of each year, submit to the Congress a report of the activities of the Service during the preceding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title X, §1004, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 267.)
#### Reynolds Metals Company, Appellant, v. Stor-Aid, Inc., Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 270.0-3 Amendments to registration statements and reports. Registration statements filed with the Commission pursuant to section 8 (54 Stat. 803; 15 U.S.C. 80a-8) and reports filed with the Commission pursuant to section 30 (54 Stat. 836; 15 U.S.C. 80a-35) may be amended in the following manner: ( a ) Each amendment shall conform to the requirements for the registration statement or report it amends with regard to filing, number of copies filed, size, paper, ink, margins, binding, and similar formal matters.
( b ) Each amendment to a particular statement or report shall have a facing sheet as follows: Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, DC 20549 Amendment No.__________ to Form____________ File No.____________ (Describe the nature of the statement or report) Dated ____________________, 19____, Pursuant to Section __________ of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Name of Registrant Address of Principal Office of Registrant
The facing sheet shall contain in addition any other information required on the facing sheet of the form for the statement or report which is being amended. Amendments to a particular statement or report which is being consecutively in the order in which filed with the Commission.
( c ) Each amendment shall contain in the manner required in the original statement or report the text of every item to which it relates and shall set out a complete amended answer to each such item. However, amendments to financial statements may contain only the particular statements or schedules in fact amended.
( d ) Each amendment shall have a signature sheet containing the form of signature required in the statement or report it amends.
(Secs. 8, 30, 54 Stat. 803, 74 Stat. 201; 15 U.S.C. 80a-8, 80a-29)
[Rule N-3, 6 FR 3966, Aug. 8, 1941, as amended at 33 FR 3217, Feb. 21, 1968]
### §10369. Research agreement authority

The Secretary may enter into contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements, for periods not to exceed 5 years, to carry out research within the Bureau of Reclamation.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, §9509, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1346.)
### §§2698 to 2698b. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, §662(4), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 188

Section 2698, Pub. L. 88–164, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 90–170, §7, Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 530, related to appropriations and grants for training of personnel.

Section 2698a, Pub. L. 88–164, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 90–170, §7, Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 530, related to grants for research and demonstration projects, payment thereof, and evaluation of such projects.

Section 2698b, Pub. L. 88–164, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 90–170, §7, Dec. 4, 1967, 81 Stat. 531, related to appointment of an advisory committee and compensation of its members and appointees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, §662, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 188, provided that the repeal by that section is effective July 1, 1971.
#### § 38.201 Additional sources for compliance.

Applicants and designated contract markets may refer to the guidance in appendix C of this part to demonstrate to the Commission compliance with the requirements of § 38.200 of this part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-4476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EZEQUIEL GARCIA GONZALES, a/k/a Yoo-Hoo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00253-TDS-6)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: April 5, 2013

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles L. White, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ezequiel Garcia Gonzales pleaded guilty to conspiracy 

to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). 

The district court sentenced Gonzales to the mandatory minimum 

term of 120 months of imprisonment and he now appeals. 

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning whether the 

sentence is reasonable. Although Gonzales was informed of the 

right to file a supplemental pro se brief, he has not done so. 

Finding no error, we affirm.

We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an 

abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 

38, 51 (2007); see also United States v. Layton, 564 F.3d 330, 

335 (4th Cir. 2009). In so doing, we examine the sentence for 

“significant procedural error,” including “failing to calculate 

(or improperly calculating) the Guidelines range, treating the 

Guidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the [18 U.S.C.] 

§ 3553(a) [(2006)] factors, selecting a sentence based on 

clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the 

chosen sentence.” Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. We will presume on 

appeal that a sentence within a properly calculated advisory 

Guidelines range is reasonable. United States v. Allen, 491 

F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir. 2007); see Rita v. United States, 551 

U.S. 338, 346-56 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness 
3

for within-Guidelines sentence). We have thoroughly reviewed 

the record and conclude that the sentence is both procedurally 

and substantively reasonable.

We have examined the entire record in accordance with 

the requirements of Anders and have found no meritorious issues 

for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court. This court requires that counsel inform Gonzales, in 

writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the 

United States for further review. If Gonzales requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition 

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for 

leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must 

state that a copy thereof was served on Gonzales. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### § 285.3 Reports with respect to proposed distribution of primary obligations.

The Bank shall file with the Commission, on or prior to the date on which it sells any of its primary obligations in connection with a distribution of such obligations in the United States, a report containing the information and documents specified in Schedule A below. The term “sell” as used in this section and in Schedule A means the making of a completed sale or a firm commitment to sell.

[46 FR 48179, Oct. 1, 1981]
Order entered January 15 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01067
- CR JIMMY DEWAYNE HILL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F09
- 53582
- W



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 30, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the status of the clerk’s record and appellate counsel. On November 14, 2014, we received the clerk’s record,
bu t we note that it does not contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. On January 15, 2015, we received the trial court’s findings that appellant filed a waiver of the right to counsel and that no hearing was conducted on the m otion for judgment nunc pro tunc that is the subject of this appeal. Accordingly, appellant is pursuing the appeal from the trial court’s November 4, 2014 nunc pro tunc order pro se.We ORDER the trial court to prepare and file, within TEN DAYS of the dat e of this

order, a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v.
State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send appellant paper copies of the 4

- volume reporter’s record f

iled on August 27, 2014, the clerk’s record filed on November 14, 2014 and the supplemental clerk’s record filed on January 15, 2015. We note that appellant tendered a pro se brief on September 10, 2014. The brief does not
contain citations to the record. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to filed, by MARCH 10,
2015 , an amended brief that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. If appellant does not file his amended brief within the time specified, the appeal will be submitted on the
deficien t brief subject to the provisions of Texas Rule of Appellate 38.9. See also Lott v. State , 874 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Tracy Holmes, Presiding Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, as well as the clerk’s and reporter’s records as set out above, to Jimmy Hil l, TDCJ No. 1719333, Boyd Unit, 200 Spur 113, Teague,
Texas 75860.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE