alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Timothy Fairbanks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005         By:  /s/ Timothy Fairbanks    Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 31.22 Prohibited trading in leverage contracts.

No futures commission merchant or introducing broker shall offer to enter into, enter into, confirm the execution of, or solicit or accept orders for any leverage contract.

[54 FR 41082, Oct. 5, 1989]
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Glenn M. Parker, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007     By: /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.     Glenn M. Parker, MD    Chief Executive Officer
No: II-15-035 May 7, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting May 14 to Discuss Agency’s 

2014 Assessment of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a public meeting for May 14 to 

discuss the agency’s assessment of the three units at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant during 

2014. 

The Browns Ferry plant, which is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located near 

Athens, Ala., about 32 miles west of Huntsville.

The meeting is scheduled from 6 to 7:30 p.m. in the Calhoun Community College Aerospace 

Training Center, 6250 Highway 31 North in Tanner, Ala. The public is invited to observe the meeting 

between the NRC and TVA officials and will have an opportunity to ask questions or communicate 

with the NRC staff after the business portion of the meeting. The NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions about the safety performance of the Browns Ferry plant as well as overall NRC oversight and 

inspection. 

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that the three units at the Browns Ferry site operated safely in 

2014, but during the first three quarters of the year, the plant was subject to increased oversight for 

some previous issues. During the fourth quarter of 2014, all three units returned to normal NRC 

oversight and the plant will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections conducted at 

all nuclear power plants.

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a 

detailed look at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said 

NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but 

these annual meetings allow us to talk to local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the Browns Ferry plant, as well as current performance 

information for Unit 1, Unit 2 and Unit 3 is available on the NRC website.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, L. Peter Larson, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to
                  which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
                  "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);
                  and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.

Dated: August 19, 2002                       /S/ L. PETER LARSON
                                             ------------------------------
                                             L. Peter Larson
                                             Acting Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
§ 242.817 Trade execution compliance schedule. ( a ) A security-based swap transaction shall be subject to the requirements of section 3C(h) of the Act upon the later of: ( 1 ) A determination by the Commission that the security-based swap is required to be cleared as set forth in section 3C(a) or any later compliance date that the Commission may establish as a term or condition of such determination or following a stay and review of such determination pursuant to section 3C(c) of the Act and § 240.3Ca-1 of this chapter thereunder; and
( 2 ) Thirty days after the available-to-trade determination submission or certification for that security-based swap is, respectively, deemed approved under § 242.806 or deemed certified under § 242.807.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit any counterparty from complying voluntarily with the requirements of section 3C(h) of the Act sooner than as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
### §16462. Service allocation

#### (a) Definition of public utility

In this section, the term "public utility" has the meaning given the term in section 824(e) of title 16.

#### (b) FERC review

In the case of non-power goods or administrative or management services provided by an associate company organized specifically for the purpose of providing such goods or services to any public utility in the same holding company system, at the election of the system or a State commission having jurisdiction over the public utility, the Commission, after the effective date of this part, shall review and authorize the allocation of the costs for such goods or services to the extent relevant to that associate company.

#### (c) Effect on Federal and State law

Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of the Commission or a State commission under other applicable law.

#### (d) Rules

Not later than 4 months after August 8, 2005, the Commission shall issue rules (which rules shall be effective no earlier than the effective date of this part) to exempt from the requirements of this section any company in a holding company system whose public utility operations are confined substantially to a single State and any other class of transactions that the Commission finds is not relevant to the jurisdictional rates of a public utility.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1275, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the effective date of this part, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (d), see Effective Date note set out under section 16451 of this title.
# SI. Wo ^

M<.5 ^

. . U:V^V,V < V.U-.^osr-v'its-.^i ,

OFF/C E O F TH E COMMISSIONE R SEA NPARNELL , GOVERNO R 4?7 yAviatio n Driv e P O Bo x19690 0 ANCHORAGE , ALASKA99519-690 0 FAX : (907 ) 269-048 9 PHONE : (907 ) 269-073 0 Jun e 14 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s DeVan y Chie fEA S an d Domesti cAnalysi s U S Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 f . j Thi s lette ri s t o expres s ou rsupport fo rth e continuatio n o fth e Essentia l Ai rService " agreemen t a t NikolskI , Alask a an d th e critica l connectio n i t bring s t o on e o fth e mos t remot e communitie s i n Alaska . Th e Stat e o fAlask a ha s n o operationa l interes t a t th e Nikolsk i ai rstrip ; thi s i s a communit yowne d facilit yan d resource s fo rairfiel d maintenanc e an d improvement s ar e nonexistent . Th e extrem e weathe rcondition s prevalen t i n th e are a contribut e furthe rt o th e challenge s face d b yai rcarrier s attemptin g t o operat e regula rservic e i n thi s remot e regio n o fAlaska . W e hav e me t wit h PenAi rt o discus s option s fo r increase d reliabilit yo fservic e an d afte rcarefu l consideratio n o fth e issues ; i t i s ou r positio n tha t th e ai rcarrie ri s providin g th e bes t servic e currentl yavailable . Several effort s ar e i n proces s tha t migh t contribut e t o improve d service , reliability , o r competition . I t i s unclea rwhe n th e Automate d Weathe rObservin g Syste m (AWOS ) .wil l b e certifie d an d eve n thes e change s wil l no t overcom e th e extrem e weathe r condition s tha t mak e regula rschedule d servic e t o Nikolsk i problematic . Should w e discove rchange s tha t improv e reliabilit yo fservic e t o Nikolski , w e wil l communicat e the m t o USDOT . Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o comment . Sincerely , Mar cLtitke n Deput yCommissioner , Aviatio n "Providin g for

th e saf e movemen

t o f peopl e an dguuJi ; an dth e delivei y o f stare se.r\-ices .
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy Michael CORK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10816

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 2007.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jimmy Michael Cork preserves for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because it does not adequately consider his history and characteristics pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1) and because the sentence is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of sentencing set forth in § 3553(a)(2). Cork concedes that his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*546 U.S. 828, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

          Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 26, 1998


                     Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Bermuda                          1-4668                    NONE
State or other jurisdiction            (Commission              (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)                  File Number)          Identification No.)
                                                   

Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton HM DX, BERMUDA             NONE
       (Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (441) 295-1422


         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)



<PAGE>


                                                         
                                    FORM 8-K

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.





Item 5.   Other Events

         On May 26, 1998,  the Company  reported  that  Florida's  Department of
Environmental  Protection  refused to issue a permit to its subsidiary,  Coastal
Petroleum  Company  ("CPC"),  to drill an  offshore  exploration  well  near St.
George's  Island.  CPC  intends to appeal the  agency's  ruling  immediately  to
Florida's First District Court of Appeal.

         A press release  relating to this  development  is filed herewith as an
exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
          Exhibits

          (c)    Exhibits

                 (99)   Additional Exhibits

                        (a)  Press release of the registrant dated May 26, 1998.



<PAGE>


                                                        



                                   SIGNATURES


          Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                         COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
                                                       (Registrant)



                                         By /s/ Benjamin W. Heath
                                                Benjamin W. Heath
                                                President

Date:  May 27, 1998
**Exhibit 10.22****AMENDMENT TO SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTE**THIS AMENDMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of this 30th day of March, 2007 by and betweenACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP., a Colorado corporation, having an office at 700 SeventeenthStreet, Suite 1200, Denver, Colorado 80202 (“Maker”) and GDBA INVESTMENTS, LLLP, a Colorado limitedliability limited partnership, having an office at 1440 Blake Street, Denver, Colorado 80202(“Holder”).WITNESSETH:WHEREAS, Maker has executed and delivered to Holder a Senior Subordinated Note dated September28, 2006 (the “Note”) to evidence Maker’s indebtedness to Holder in the principal amount of ThreeMillion Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00); andWHEREAS, Maker and Holder wish to further subordinate the Note to a credit facility to beextended to Maker by United Western Bank and otherwise modify certain terms and provisions of theNote;NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth herein above, and for other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, intendingto be legally bound, the parties hereto do hereby mutually and expressly understand and agree asfollows:1. Definitions. The definition of the term “Senior Debt” appearing in Section 5,entitled “Definitions,” of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:“Senior Debt” means all indebtedness, obligations and otherliabilities of the Company to (i) Vectra Bank Colorado, nationalassociation, pursuant to that certain First Amendment to CreditAgreement dated August 3, 2006, as amended, (ii) United WesternBank (“UWB”) pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement dated March30, 2007 between UWB and Maker, as the same may be amended,modified, restated or extended from time to time, and any otherindebtness in replacement or subordination to Vectra Bank or UnitedWestern Bank as may be approved by Holder in writing from time totime.2. Subordination. The words “principal and” appearing in line ten of Section 2,entitled “Subordination,” of the Note are hereby deleted.3. Representations and Warranties. Maker hereby represents and warrants, and Holderhereby acknowledges and agrees, that (a) no default has occurred under the Note, (b) except asprovided herein, the Note has not been modified or amended, and (c) the execution and delivery ofthis Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of the parties hereto.
 
 

 
4. Ratification. Except as modified by this Agreement, all of the terms of the Noteare ratified and reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect.5. Inurement. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon andshall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.6. Governing Law. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by theapplicable laws of the State of Colorado.[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have each caused this Agreement to be executed by theirrespective duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written.           MAKER:           ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.,
### §2465a. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 101–611, title I, §112, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3198, related to Space Shuttle use policy. Subsecs. (a), (c), and (d) were repealed and reenacted as subsecs. (a), (b), and (c), respectively, of section 70102 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs. Subsec. (b), requiring Administrator to submit implementation plan in report to Congress within six months after Nov. 16, 1990, was repealed as obsolete.
##### 



AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN NATIONSHEALTH, INC. AND ROBERT E. TREMAIN
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WITNESS:
    
    
    
    NATIONSHEALTH INC.Timothy Fairbanks
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Glenn M. ParkerName:
    
    Glenn M. Parker, M.D.Title:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerWITNESS:Adelaida Savard
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Robert E. TremainName:
    
    Robert E. Tremain