alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 388 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 388

  To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
  Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals 
detained at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2011

  Mr. Rooney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
  Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals 
detained at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Detainee Trials at Gitmo Act''.

SEC. 2. DETENTION FACILITY AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA TO 
              REMAIN OPEN AND REQUIREMENT THAT INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT 
              THAT FACILITY BE TRIED ONLY BY MILITARY COMMISSION.

    (a) Detention Facility.--The detention facility at Naval Station, 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba shall remain in use indefinitely by the United 
States as a detention facility.
    (b) Trial by Military Commission.--Any individual who is detained 
at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act, may only be tried by military commission under chapter 47A 
of title 10, United States Code. Any trial of such an individual by 
military commission shall be conducted at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
Bay, Cuba.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 128.1 Exclusion of functions from the Administrative Procedure Act.

The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) authorizes the President to control the import and export of defense articles and services in furtherance of world peace and the security and foreign policy of the United States. Pursuant to delegated authorities, the Secretary of State is authorized to make decisions on whether license applications or other written requests for approval shall be granted, or whether exemptions may be used. The Secretary of State is also authorized to revoke, suspend, or amend licenses or other written approvals whenever such action is deemed to be advisable. The administration of the AECA is a foreign affairs function encompassed within the meaning of the military and foreign affairs exclusion of the Administrative Procedure Act and is thereby expressly exempt from various provisions of that Act. Because the exercising of the foreign affairs function, including the decisions required to implement the AECA, is highly discretionary, it is excluded from review under the Administrative Procedure Act.

[87 FR 16425, Mar. 23, 2022]
#### MILLER v. BROOKS

No. 345P96

Case below: 123 N.C.App. 20

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1997.
Exhibit 10.17



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF ORAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN DR. DAVID C. COLLINS AND 
 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL INC. 
  
 As announced in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2005, Dr. David C. Collins will remain as Chairman of the Board with an
annual compensation of one dollar per year. 
  
 The Chairman is
expected to spend approximately 25% of his time on his duties, which include special projects and overseeing (with the concurrence of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors) a charitable budget for Learning
Tree of $200,000. Prior to October 2005, the Chairman was employed on a full time basis as the Chief Executive Officer of Learning Tree.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 13th day of November 2003.

                                                  /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 289.1 Applicability of this part.

This part (Regulation IFC) prescribes the reports to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) pursuant to section 13(a) of the International Finance Corporation Act.
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL W.
PALKOVIC                                              
|Michael W. Palkovic Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 10, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00728-CV

Nelson Partners, LLC; Nelson Brothers Property Management, Inc. d/b/a Nelson Partners 

Property Management, Inc.; NP Skyloft Equity IB; and Patrick Nelson, Appellants

v.

Burgundy 523 Offshore Fund, LTD; Axonic Special Opportunities SBL Master Fund, LP; 

Axonic Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP; TCG Skyloft Owner, LLC; and Does 1-10, 

Appellees

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-GN-22-001980, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on November 27, 

2023. On November 28, 2023, we notified appellants that no clerk’s record had been filed due to 

their failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record. The notice requested that appellants make arrangements for the clerk’s record and 

submit a status report regarding this appeal by December 8, 2023. Further, the notice advised 

appellants that their failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal 

for want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not filed a status report or otherwise responded 

to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court 
2

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellants have not established 

that they are entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because 

appellants have failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: December 15, 2023
**EXHIBIT 23.3**                                                                                                                              *Gaffney, Cline & Associates***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVOIR ENGINEERS**We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Endeavour International Corporation Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005, and the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement numberNo. 333-119577 of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-8, number 333-118503 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-3, Registration Statement number No. 333-128692 of EndeavourInternational Corporation on Form S-8, number 333-130515 of Endeavour International Corporation onForm S-3 and number 333-124145 of Endeavour International Corporation on Form S-3, as amended ofthe reference to Gaffney, Cline & Associates Ltd.Bentley, Hampshire, England
### §§17701, 17702. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17701, Pub. L. 110–422, §2, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4781, which related to congressional findings on the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 20102 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 17702, Pub. L. 110–422, §3, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4782, which related to definitions, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 10101 of Title 51.
731.775 Conference approval requirements.

USAID's policies regarding conference approval requirements are set forth in (48 CFR) AIDAR

731.205–43. These policies are also applicable to contracts with nonprofit organizations.

Parent topic: Subpart 731.7—Contracts With Nonprofit Organizations
§ 1471.5 Investigation of request; Panel recommendation and assistance. Upon receipt of a request for consideration of an impasse, the Panel or its designee will promptly conduct an investigation. After due consideration, the Panel shall either: ( a ) Decline to assert jurisdiction in the event that it finds that no impasse exists or that there is other good cause for not asserting jurisdiction, in whole or in part, and so advise the parties in writing, stating its reasons; or
( b ) Recommend to the parties procedures, including but not limited to arbitration, for the resolution of the impasse and/or assist them in resolving the impasse through whatever methods and procedures the Panel considers appropriate.
(March 14, 1978)

#### In the Matter of Michael Capanegro, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Motion by petitioner to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony •conviction. Motion granted. Respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on March 8, 1955, under the name Michael Joseph Capanegro, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit 29, § 501, subd [c] willfully, unlawfully and knowingly embezzle and cause to be embezzled, extracted and converted to his own use and the use of others, moneys, funds and other assets, for legal services allegedly rendered by him on behalf of Local 1101, Communication Workers of America, when he knew that he had not in fact performed the claimed services and that said bills vastly overstated the nature and value of the services performed) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 27, 1977. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith by reason of said conviction *1021
      *(Matter of Chu,*42 NY2d 490). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
#### § 405.4 Financial recordkeeping and reporting of currency and foreign transactions by registered government securities brokers and dealers.

Every registered government securities broker or dealer who is subject to the requirements of the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 shall comply with the reporting, recordkeeping and record retention requirements of 31 CFR part 103. Where 31 CFR part 103 and § 404.3 of this chapter require the same records to be preserved for different periods of time, such records or reports shall be preserved for the longer period of time.
Editorial Note on Part 133
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 133 appear at 68 FR 66582, Nov. 26, 2003.

§ 133.225 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 133.205(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must__ ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either__ ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4005 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4005

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study and 
report to Congress on gaps in port security in the United States and a 
                         plan to address them.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gauging American Port Security Act'' 
or the ``GAPS Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY, REPORT, AND PLAN TO ADDRESS GAPS IN PORT SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act the Secretary of Homeland Security shall--
            (1) conduct a study of, and submit to the Congress a report 
        on, remaining gaps in port security in the United States; and
            (2) include in such report a prioritization of such gaps 
        and a plan for addressing them.
    (b) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be 
submitted in classified form but shall contain an unclassified annex.

SEC. 3. INFORMATION SHARING.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in accordance with rules 
for the handling of classified information, share, as appropriate, with 
designated points of contact from Federal agencies and State, local, or 
tribal governments, and port system owners and operators, relevant 
information regarding remaining gaps in port security of the United 
States, prioritization of such gaps, and a plan for addressing such 
gaps. In the event that a designated point of contact does not have the 
necessary security clearance to receive such information, the Secretary 
shall help expedite the clearance process, as appropriate.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 127.6 Seizure and forfeiture in attempts at illegal exports. ( a ) An attempt to export from the United States any defense articles in violation of the provisions of this subchapter constitutes an offense punishable under section 401 of title 22 of the United States Code. Whenever it is known or there is probable cause to believe that any defense article is intended to be or is being or has been exported or removed from the United States in violation of law, such article and any vessel, vehicle or aircraft involved in such attempt is subject to seizure, forfeiture and disposition as provided in section 401 of title 22 of the United States Code.
( b ) Similarly, an attempt to violate any of the conditions under which a temporary export or temporary import license was issued pursuant to this subchapter or to violate the requirements of § 123.2 of this subchapter also constitutes an offense punishable under section 401 of title 22 of the United States Code, and such article, together with any vessel, vehicle or aircraft involved in any such attempt is subject to seizure, forfeiture, and disposition as provided in section 401 of title 22 of the United States Code.
§ 270.14a-2 Exemption from section 14(a) of the Act for certain registered separate accounts and their principal underwriters. ( a ) A registered separate account, and any principal underwriter for such account, shall be exempt from section 14(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-14(a)) with respect to a public offering of variable annuity contracts participating in such account.
( b ) Any registered management investment company which has as a promoter an insurance company and which offers its securities to separate accounts of such insurance company that offer variable annuity contracts and are registered under the Act as unit investment trusts (“trust accounts”), and any principal underwriter for such investment company, shall be exempt from section 14(a) with respect to such offering and to the offering of such securities to trust accounts of other insurance companies.
( c ) Any registered management investment company exempt from section 14(a) of the Act pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall be exempt from sections 15(a), 16(a), and 32(a)(2) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-15(a), 80a-16(a), and 80a-31(a)(2)), to the extent prescribed in §§ 270.15a-3, 270.16a-1, and 270.32a-2 (Rules 15a-3, 16a-1, and 32a-2 under the Act), provided that such investment company complies with the conditions set forth in Rules 15a-3, 16a-1, and 32a-2 as if it were a separate account.
[85 FR 26109, May 1, 2020]
§ 120.56 Release. ( a ) *Release.* Technical data is released through: ( 1 ) Visual or other inspection by foreign persons of a defense article that reveals technical data to a foreign person;
( 2 ) Oral or written exchanges with foreign persons of technical data in the United States or abroad;
( 3 ) The use of access information to cause or enable a foreign person, including yourself, to access, view, or possess unencrypted technical data; or
( 4 ) The use of access information to cause technical data outside of the United States to be in unencrypted form.
( b ) *Provision of access information.* Authorization for a release of technical data to a foreign person is required to provide access information to that foreign person, if that access information can cause or enable access, viewing, or possession of the unencrypted technical data.
NO. 07-09-0361-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 30, 2009

______________________________

ELIDA and RUDY MORIN,

Appellants

V.

OXY, INC., OCCIDENTAL PERMIAN, LTD., and MARK KINSLOW,

Appellees

_______________________________

FROM THE 237 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; th

NO. 2008-541,844; HON. LESLIE HATCH, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellants Elida and Rudy Morin filed a notice of appeal on November 4, 2009.

However, appellants did not pay the $175 filing fee required from appellants under Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. Nor did they file an affidavit of indigence per Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 20.1. By letter from this Court dated November 9, 2009, we

informed appellants that “the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 has not been paid . . . .
2

Failure to pay the filing fee within ten (10) days from the date of this notice may result in

a dismissal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex.

App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d). The deadline lapsed, and the fee was not received. 

Because appellants have failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the

court, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

 

Per Curiam
### §15443. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15443 was editorially reclassified as section 21043 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.