alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 279.3 Form ADV-H, application for a temporary or continuing hardship exemption.

An investment adviser must file this form under § 275.203-3 of this chapter to request a temporary hardship exemption or apply for a continuing hardship exemption.

[65 FR 57451, Sept. 22, 2000]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form ADV-H, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
EGU MACT - RIA - Interagency comments on Chapter 6
12/14/2011 11:02 AM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob, Attached are interagency comments on Chapter 6 of the RIA. I’ll be sending the suggested edits for each Chapter as I pull them together, so you can start to address them.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Cortney

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209_I nteragencycommentsu nderEO13563.docx
EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    


    


    


    -
      ALPINE ANNOUNCES PURCHASE OF MINORITY INTEREST IN ESSEX ELECTRIC INC.
      -

    


    EAST
      RUTHERFORD, N.J.,
      January 25, 2006 PR Newswire/ -- The Alpine Group, Inc. (“Alpine”) (OTC:
      APNI.OB) today announced that it had purchased from Superior Essex Inc. (Nasdaq:
      SPSX) approximately 16% of the common stock of Essex Electric Inc. and a warrant
      entitling Superior Essex to acquire 3.9% of Essex Electric’s common
      stock, for a purchase price of $8,500,000. Following the purchase, Alpine owns
      100% of Essex Electric.

     

    The
      Alpine Group, Inc., headquartered in New Jersey, is a holding company, which
      owns Essex Electric Inc., a manufacturer of copper electrical wire products
      for
      use in residential, commercial and industrial buildings.

     

    Except
      for the historical information herein, the matters discussed in this news
      release include forward-looking statements that may involve a number of risks
      and uncertainties. Actual results may vary significantly based on a number
      of
      factors, including, but not limited to, risks in product and technology
      development, market acceptance of new products and continuing product demand,
      prediction and timing of customer orders, the impact of competitive products
      and
      pricing, changing economic conditions, including changes in short-term interest
      rates and foreign currency fluctuations, and other risk factors detailed in
      Alpine’s most recent annual report and other filings with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission.
Part 518 [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** General Services Administration Acquisition Manual
#### Edmund B. Bellinger, Jr., Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 32041.)

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing á ‘ claim ¡^or damages] for. alleged; false' :impfiáóhinent,‘ ’.assault,1 ánH' níalióious "prosecution,'' alleged vtp" K.áv'e Peen' committed against tilaíffiáht' by ‘a! 'memb’ef of the‘State Police' while1 claimant was,serving • on'duty VitH the’Natitttiaíl ‘Guard.’) .Present &emdash; McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [106 Misc. 575.]
§ 37.4 Procedures for listing products and implementing rules. ( a ) An applicant for registration as a swap execution facility may submit a swap's terms and conditions prior to listing the product as part of its application for registration.
( b ) Any swap terms and conditions or rules submitted as part of a swap execution facility's application for registration shall be considered for approval by the Commission at the time the Commission issues the swap execution facility's order of registration.
( c ) After the Commission issues the order of registration, a swap execution facility shall submit a swap's terms and conditions, including amendments to such terms and conditions, new rules, or rule amendments pursuant to the procedures under part 40 of this chapter.
( d ) Any swap terms and conditions or rules submitted as part of an application to reinstate the registration of a dormant swap execution facility, as defined in § 40.1 of this chapter, shall be considered for approval by the Commission at the time the Commission approves the dormant swap execution facility's reinstatement of registration.
United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 29, 1998


                     Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Bermuda                          1-4668                    NONE
State or other jurisdiction            (Commission             (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)                  File Number)          Identification No.)


Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton HM DX, BERMUDA             NONE
      (Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (441) 295-1422


         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)



<PAGE>


                                                         
                                    FORM 8-K

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.





Item 5.   Other Events

         On June 29, 1998, Coastal Petroleum Company said the U.S. Supreme Court
has declined to review a Florida  appellate  court ruling against the Company in
its royalty interest claim against the State.

         A press release  relating to this  development  is filed herewith as an
exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
          Exhibits

          (c)   Exhibits

                (99)   Additional Exhibits

                       (a)  Press release of the registrant dated June 29, 1998.



<PAGE>


                                                         



                                   SIGNATURES


          Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                         COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
                                                       (Registrant)



                                         By /s/ Benjamin W. Heath
                                                Benjamin W. Heath
                                                President

Date:  June 29, 1998
Subpart 5325.1  — BUY AMERICAN - SUPPLIES               **Parent topic:** Part 5325 - Foreign Acquisition5325.103 Exceptions       (a)(ii)(B)(1) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.         (a)(ii)(B)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.         (a)(ii)(B)(3) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.         (b)(ii)(A) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103 and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.         (b)(ii)(B) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103 and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.         (b)(ii)(C) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103 and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.
#### § 1100.1 Cross-references to employee ethical conduct standards, financial disclosure and financial interests regulations and other conduct rules.

Employees of the United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission are subject to the executive branch standards of ethical conduct contained in 5 CFR part 2635, the executive branch financial disclosure regulations contained in 5 CFR part 2634, and the executive branch financial interests regulations contained in 5 CFR part 2640, as well as the executive branch employee responsibilities and conduct regulations contained in 5 CFR part 735.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.005.507 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __2

_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 6/29/2010 Time: 11:40 am EST

Company Name: Elementis Chromium (NC0003875) Contact Name: Sean Coury

Phone No.: (901)675-7229

Name: Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Mercury and Silver Discharges Report ed to DMR in 2008



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Elementis Chromium on June 29, 2010, to speak with S ean Coury. Mr. Coury and I briefly discussed the mercury and silver discharges for Outfall 001 reported to DMR in 2008. Mr. Coury confirmed that mercury and silver concentrations for May 2008 were incorrectly r eported. Mr. Coury also confirmed that the February, August, and November monthly concentrations should not be reported as 0 mg/L, but as a value with a below detection limit indicator. See the following tables for the original data reported to DMR 2008 and the corrected concentration data confirmed by Mr. Coury.

I also asked Mr. Coury about the remaining months that repo rted NODI code 8. He stated that these pollutants only require quarterly monitoring and that there should be not value for these months.

I told Mr. Coury that we would correct the concentrati ons and the number of reporting months in the database.

Original Monthly Discharge Data for Mercury and Silver fo r Elementis Chromium Reported to DMR in 2008

Outfall Monitoring Period

Date NODI Code Average Concentration (mg/L) Average Flow

(MGD) Mercury 001 31-Jan-08 8 0.659129 001 29-Feb-08 0.0003 0.668433 001 31-Mar-08 8 0.6071 001 30-Apr-08 8 0.614742 001 31-May-08 0.2 0.707 001 30-Jun-08 8 0.589548 001 31-Jul-08 8 0.582452 001 31-Aug-08 0 0.58029 001 30-Sept-08 8 0.595933 001 31-Oct-08 8 0.557667 001 30-Nov-08 0 0.606935 001 31-Dec-08 8 0.691677 Silver 001 31-Jan-08 8 0.659129 001 29-Feb-08 0 0.668433Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 001 31-Mar-08 8 0.6071 001 30-Apr-08 8 0.614742 001 31-May-08 1 0.707 001 30-Jun-08 8 0.589548 001 31-Jul-08 8 0.582452 001 31-Aug-08 0 0.58029 001 30-Sept-08 8 0.595933 001 31-Oct-08 8 0.557667 001 30-Nov-08 0 0.606935 001 31-Dec-08 8 0.691677



### Corrected Monthly Discharge Data for Mercury and Silver for Eleme ntis Chromium

Outfall Monitoring Period

Date BDL

Indiciator Average

Concentration (mg/L) Average Flow

(MGD) Mercury 001 29-Feb-08 0.0003 0.668433 001 31-May-08 0.0002 0.707 001 31-Aug-08 < 0.0002 0.58029 001 30-Nov-08 < 0.0002 0.606935 Silver 001 29-Feb-08 < 0.001 0.668433 001 31-May-08 < 0.001 0.707 001 31-Aug-08 < 0.001 0.58029 001 30-Nov-08 < 0.005 0.606935
§ 432.1 Scope. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part shall apply whenever any power output (in watts or otherwise), power band or power frequency response, or distortion capability or characteristic is represented, either expressly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, sale, or offering for sale, in commerce as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of sound power amplification equipment manufactured or sold for home entertainment purposes, such as for example, radios, record and tape players, radio-phonograph and/or tape combinations, component audio amplifiers, self-powered speakers for computers, multimedia systems and sound systems, and the like.
( b ) Representations shall be exempt from this part if all representations of performance characteristics referred to in paragraph (a) of this section clearly and conspicuously disclose a manufacturer's rated power output and that rated output does not exceed two (2) watts (per channel or total).
( c ) It is an unfair method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice within the meaning of section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)) to violate any applicable provision of this part.
[39 FR 15387, May 3, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 37235, July 9, 1998]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Business Process Management Initiative

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 1, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Business Process Management 
Initiative (``BPMI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Business 
Process Management Initiative, Lighthouse Point, FL. The nature and 
scope of BPMI's standards development activities are: standardization 
of terminology, definitions, formats, quality, and procedures for the 
production, use and deployment of business process management systems, 
and related data. Standards, recommended practices, and technical 
reports prepared in accordance with BPMI's policies and procedures are 
intended to have broad national acceptance, as well as provide the 
basis upon which to achieve international accord in the development of 
ISO standards.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27066 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 37.403 Additional requirements for cash-settled swaps. ( a ) For cash-settled swaps, the swap execution facility shall demonstrate that it monitors the pricing of the reference price used to determine cash flows or settlement;
( b ) For cash-settled swaps listed on the swap execution facility where the reference price is formulated and computed by the swap execution facility, the swap execution facility shall demonstrate that it monitors the continued appropriateness of its methodology for deriving that price; and
( c ) For cash-settled swaps listed on the swap execution facility where the reference price relies on a third-party index or instrument, including an index or instrument traded on another venue, the swap execution facility shall demonstrate that it monitors the continued appropriateness of the index or instrument.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-Sector Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James H. Long,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/   James H. Long
------------------------
James H. Long
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


May 27, 2004
#### Louis Frangipane, appellee, v. Frank Agosto, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,186.

Action to recover money intrusted to defendants and which they refused to return. Suit dismissed as to appellee’s codefendant and judgment for plaintiff against appellee. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Laurence B. Jacobs, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 18, 1922.

Cairoli Gigliotti, for appellant. May E. Reitz, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
----

----

| 1. | the                  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Across                  America Real Estate Corporation,                  for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Across                  America Real Estate Corporation,. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                           |    |
| Dated August                  14, 2006 |                                                | /s/ James                  W Creamer III |
|                                        | James                  W Creamer III,               |
|                                        | Treasurer,                  Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
No: II-14-049 September 16, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Assigns New Resident Inspector to Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have selected Adam Ruh to serve as the 

new resident inspector at the Browns Ferry nuclear plant, located near Athens, Ala., about 32 miles 

west of Huntsville. Ruh joins Senior Resident Inspector Dave Dumbacher and Resident Inspector Tom 

Stephen at the plant, which is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority.

In 2012, Ruh joined the NRC as a project engineer in the Region II office in Atlanta.

Before joining the agency, Ruh served as a U.S. Navy civilian 

engineer for seven years. At Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Ruh provided 

engineering support for overhauling and deactivating Los-Angeles 

class and Ohio-class submarines. While with the Supervisor of 

Shipbuilding, Conversion & Repair in Newport News, Ruh provided 

government oversight of the engineering work performed by the 

shipbuilding contractor (Newport News Shipbuilding), which 

including overhaul of Nimitz-class aircraft carriers as well as 

construction, qualification, testing, and certification of Virginia-class 

submarines and Ford-class aircraft carriers.

Ruh graduated with highest honors and received a Bachelor of Science in mechanical 

engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Ruh graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of 

Science in mathematics from Georgia Southwestern State University. Ruh has graduated with a Master 

of Engineering degree from Old Dominion University.

“Adam Ruh has the dedication and experience to carry out the NRC mission of protecting 

people and the environment by helping ensure the safety of the Browns Ferry plant,” said NRC Region 

II Administrator Victor McCree.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each operating U.S. commercial nuclear 

plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at one 

site for up to seven years. 

The Browns Ferry resident inspectors can be reached at 256-729-6196.
#### Israel MUNIZ-TIJERO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75503.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007 *.

Filed March 16, 2007.

Nadia Farah, Law Office of Nadia Fa-rah, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Ann Carroll Varnon, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*569Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Munizr-Tijero seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Muniz-Tijero’s contentions that the IJ’s factfind-ing was not supported by substantial evidence and the IJ employed an incorrect legal standard because Muniz-Tijero did not raise those issues before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).

We also lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). Muniz-Tijero’s contentions regarding the IJ’s alleged failure to consider conditions in Mexico does not raise a colorable constitutional claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

Finally, we reject Muniz-Tijero’s challenges to the BIA’s interpretation of the hardship standard. *See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1004-1006 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 1010.

#### Texas Company et al. *v.*Dyer, Vehicle Commissioner.

Jurisdictional statement distributed May 29, 1937.

Decided June 1, 1937.

*Mr. William H. Watkins*for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.*v. *Humes,*115 U. S. 512, 523; *Western Union*v. *Indiana,*165 U. S. 304, 307, 310; *Bankers Trust Co.*v. *Blodgett,*260 U. S. 647, 651, 652.