alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIL ED U.S . C OUR T O F A PPE ALS ELE VEN TH CIRCUI T De cem ber 12 , 2 006 THO MAS K. KA

HN CLE RK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1296 2 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 05-00289 -CR- CG UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee, ve rs us YAKUBU HOWARD, D ef en dant- Appe llant.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ App ea l f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D istri ct

Co urt f or the S o u t h e rn D i s t r i c to f

A l ab a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (D ec em be r 12, 200 6) Before BIRC H, BL ACK

and MAR CUS , C ircuit Judg es PE R CU RIA M: K ri ste n G ar

tm anRo ge rs , appoi nte d c ouns el f or Y ak ubu H ow ar d inthi s dir ec t c ri m ina l a

ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr awf ro m f urthe r re pr es en ta tio n of

the ap pe llant and f

ile d abr ie f pur suant t o A nde rs v. Ca lif or nia , 386 U . S. 738 , 87 S . Ct .2

1396 , 18 L . E d. 2d 4 93 ( 1967 ). O ur ind ep en de nt r ev ie wof

the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls that c ouns el ’ s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the appe al is co rr ec t. B ec au se ind ep en de nt e xa m ina tio n of the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls n o arg uable iss ue s of m er it, co unse l’ s m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRA NTE D , a nd H ow ar d’ s c onvi ct iona nd sentence are AF FIRMED .
### §2752. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2752, originally enacted as section 122 of Pub. L. 88–452, was renumbered section 442 of Pub. L. 89–329 and transferred to section 1087–52 of Title 20, Education.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4047 

To require solicitations for Federal procurement contracts to include information about the applicability of Buy American law and whether foreign 

goods may be used to fulfill the requirements of the contracts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2012 

Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require solicitations for Federal procurement contracts 

to include information about the applicability of Buy 

American law and whether foreign goods may be used 

to fulfill the requirements of the contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Disclosure in Fed5 eral Contracting Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4047 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR INFORMATION ABOUT BUY 

2 AMERICAN LAW AND ACCEPTABLE FOREIGN 

3 GOODS TO BE INCLUDED IN CERTAIN FED4 ERAL CONTRACT SOLICITATIONS. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—In any solicitation for a Federal 

6 contract for the procurement of goods, the Federal agency 

7 issuing the solicitation shall include the following informa8 tion: 

9 (1) A statement of— 

10 (A) whether chapter 83 of title 41, United 

11 States Code (popularly known as the ‘‘Buy 

12 American Act’’), applies or does not apply to 

13 the contract; and 

14 (B) if such chapter 83 does not apply to 

15 the contract, the reasons why such chapter does 

16 not apply, including a description of any appli17 cable exception or waiver of such chapter and 

18 the law or regulation providing such exception 

19 or waiver. 

20 (2) Whether such chapter 83 applies or does 

21 not apply— 

22 (A) a statement of whether goods from for23 eign countries would be acceptable as end prod24 ucts for purposes of fulfilling the requirements 

25 of the contract; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4047 IH

1 (B) a list of all the foreign countries whose 

2 goods would be acceptable as end products for 

3 such purposes. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply to so5 licitations for contracts issued after the date occurring 

6 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.332 Form SHO, report of institutional investment managers pursuant to section 13(f)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This form shall be used by institutional investment managers that are required to furnish reports pursuant to section 13(f)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(f)(2)) and 17 CFR 240.13f-2 (Rule 13f-2).

[88 FR 75185, Nov. 1, 2023]
Jeff Knepp and Electric Moto Corporation have orally agreed to have Mr. Knepp serve as a consultant for Electric Moto for an unspecified amount of time. His duties shall be as a day to day consultant related to Electric Moto’s marketing, finances, office management and production/design.
#### In the Matter of Nicholas Rubino, Appellant, v. Empire Heating Corporation, et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to punish the respondents for contempt by reason of their alleged willful and deliberate failure to produce books and records pursuant to an order of the Special Term *(Matter of Rubina*v. *Empire Heating Gorp.,*2 A D 2d 988) granting to the petitioner an inspection of the corporate respondent’s books and records, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 24, 1958, which denies his application. Order affirmed, without costs. The finding that “No proof has been offered that there was any willful destruction” of the sheets is reversed, and the finding is made that there was a willful destruction of the sheets. But since a finding would have been warranted that it was *1066not satisfactorily established that the missing papers were in existence when the inspection was originally granted by the Special Term’s order, the respondents may not be held in contempt for not producing the papers. There can be no willful disobedience to a lawful mandate of a court prior to the time that the mandate is made (see, e.g., *Feingold*v. *Walworth Bros.,*238 N. Y. 446; *Moore*v. *Jackson Tube Co.,*86 N. Y. S. 2d 488; *People*v. *Shapolsky,*8 A D 2d 122). New findings of fact are made as indicated herein. Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldoek, Acting P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant the application to punish respondents for contempt.
237.7804 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.237-7027, Transfer and Adoption of Military Animals, in solicitations and

contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of

commercial products and commercial services, that require the services of a contract working dog.

Parent topic: Subpart 237.78 - TRANSFER AND ADOPTION OF MILITARY ANIMALS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report'), Joni K. Troska, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Joni K. Troska
                                               -------------------
                                               Joni K. Troska,
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 12, 2004
Exhibit 4.1 Specimen of Common Stock Certificate


    Exhibit
      4.1

    Specimen
      Common Stock Certificate

    


    


    


    


     

    INCORPORATED
      UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

     

    
      	
               

              Number

               

            	 	
               

              Shares

               

            
	 	 	 


    

     

    


     

     

    VALUE
      CONSULTING CORP.

     

     

    


     

     

    The
      Corporation is authorized to issue 100,000,000 Common Shares -- Par Value $.0001
      each

     

     

           

     

     

    This
      Certifies That                         **(NAME)**                       is
      the owner of

     

     

                           **(letter
      amount)**                        fully
      paid and non-assessable Shares of the above Corporation transferable only on
      the
      books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
      Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
      endorsed.

     

     

           In
      Witness Whereof,
      the
      said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly
      authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the
      Corporation.

     

     

    Dated________________________

     

     

    


     

     

    


     

    
      	 	 	 
	
               

              Secretary
                - Treasurer

               

            	 	
               

              President
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2019-3 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  June 17, 2022



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---
§ 4.41 Advertising by commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, and the principals thereof. ( a ) No commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, or any principal thereof, may advertise in a manner which: ( 1 ) Employs any device, scheme or artifice to defraud any participant or client or prospective participant or client;
( 2 ) Involves any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any participant or client or any prospective participant or client; or
( 3 ) Refers to any testimonial, unless the advertisement or sales literature providing the testimonial prominently discloses: ( i ) That the testimonial may not be representative of the experience of other clients;
( ii ) That the testimonial is no guarantee of future performance or success; and
( iii ) If, more than a nominal sum is paid, the fact that it is a paid testimonial.
( b ) ( 1 ) No person may present the performance of any simulated or hypothetical commodity interest account, transaction in a commodity interest or series of transactions in a commodity interest of a commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, or any principal thereof, unless such performance is accompanied by one of the following: ( i ) The following statement: “These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.” ; or
( ii ) A statement prescribed pursuant to rules promulgated by a registered futures association pursuant to section 17(j) of the Act.
( 2 ) If the presentation of such simulated or hypothetical performance is other than oral, the prescribed statement must be prominently disclosed and in immediate proximity to the simulated or hypothetical performance being presented.
( c ) The provisions of this section shall apply: ( 1 ) To any publication, distribution or broadcast of any report, letter, circular, memorandum, publication, writing, advertisement or other literature or advice, whether by electronic media or otherwise, including information provided via internet or e-mail, the texts of standardized oral presentations and of radio, television, seminar or similar mass media presentations; and
( 2 ) Regardless of whether the commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor is exempt from registration under the Act.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3038-0005) [46 FR 26013, May 8, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 63035, Dec. 30, 1981; 60 FR 38192, July 25, 1995; 72 FR 8109, Feb. 23, 2007]
The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Setreta(V 

.U .. S. Department of Transportation . · .. 

'1200 New Jersey Avenue, .SE 

wa~hlnjton, DC 20~90 

Dear secr~tary Foxx: 

JanLiary 1.7, 2015 

(;tt ... IRI

W

I, SUDCOHiolmEE

QN t:IIJII.JH 

'.Su.CciMNITTI:E ON TiiADE 

~8COioiMITTE,E O,N ,SOCI,u. ·s£¢UA,1Tv 

.JOINT CO~MITTE:£ ON TAXATION 

M.V office has continued to monitor the flllnss·ln the docl<et regardlns Soutf'IW~$t's pleac;llngs to ttw 

Oep~r~ment tO. r~nwv~;~ designci.tlons granted to :United and/or SkyWest sUch that Southwest can enter 

the Hobby- Mexico Cltv and Hobby -lo.s Cabos markets. Slhce my first lett~ to· you 1 have remained 

ln~erested 

In this matter,given the potential negative consequences to consumer$ end the unnecessa~v 

Wlthd ra.wai of operatl.llg fights fror:n Ol')e carrier for the 'benefit of another. 

After carefully re.vlewlng the tlmellne and facts, I w~uld re.quest the .Department simply srant Southw~st 

~xtra·bha~era authority for ~he 2.5 mohth period lletwe~n t~~lr announced service data and the U.s. • 

Mexico agreement enactment date of Januarv 1, 2016. Given the aJr titrrier and co)l~~mer Impact, ~ltmg w'th the timing of't~e .U.s. Mexico air transport agreement, this arrang~ment would eliminate the 

rieed for a costly, yet utmece$~;;try, route proceeding If the status quo Is followed. It Is my understanding 

that there Is ample precedent for DOT to gr.ant e><tra-bllater.al authority as both U.S. and Mexican 

carrl~rs were granted such a~tho~lY 'In 1999, ;~long with subsequent examples ·tn more recent ve~n·s between the two countries. Ba~ed on tlmellne and precedent. I want tQ r:elterate th~Uh~ Department should use the authority It 

has to grant e>ctra~bilatetal authority to .Southwest (or any carrier for that matter) so that·all•lrllne.s can 

partlc;;ipate In ea<;h oftt,e Houston- Mexico City and Houston -san Jos@ del Cabo rriai'lcets. This Is a 

common sense solution that would allow a.ll carrlers·to·S.erve the marl<~t ln question without disrupting 

exlstlns services. 

Member of Con~ress
§ 270.15a-2 Annual continuance of contracts. ( a ) For purposes of sections 15(a) and 15(b) of the Act, the continuance of a contract for a period more than two years after the date of its execution shall be deemed to have been specifically approved at least annually by the board of directors or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of a registered investment company if such approval occurs: ( 1 ) With respect to the first continuance of a contract, during the 90 days prior to and including the earlier of ( i ) the date specified in such contract for its termination in the absence of such approval, or
( ii ) the second anniversary of the date upon which such contract was executed; or
( 2 ) With respect to any subsequent continuance of a contract, during the 90 days prior to and including the first anniversary of the date upon which the most recent previous annual continuance of such contract became effective.
( b ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to any continuance of a contract which shall have been approved not later than 90 days after the date of adoption of this section, provided that such contract shall expire, by its terms, not later than 17 months from the date of adoption of this section.
Note:
This section does not establish the exclusive method of complying with the Act. It provides one procedure by which a registered investment company may comply with the applicable provisions of sections 15(a) and 15(b) of the Act; it does not preclude any other appropriate procedure. Any annual continuance of a contract approved in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of § 270.15a-2 will constitute a renewal of such contract for the purposes of section 15(c) of the Act, and therefore such renewal must be approved by the disinterested directors within the times specified in the section for a continuance.
[41 FR 41911, Sept. 24, 1976]
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     May 2, 2016





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---







ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On May 2, 2016, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the first quarter 2016.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.








---







SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  May 2, 2016By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer











---







EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued May 2, 2016, providing information on the first quarter 2016 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website May 2, 2016, providing supplemental financial information on the first quarter 2016.