alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### J ao . 

### 28 . 2015

1 : 17PM 

# •

•

' . 

### . KE:VI.N BRADY Mcoi801 or **C~ruis**
**5** 8TH OIS"'Rii:T or n
: IIA• **CQNGR~SS** OF 

### 't-ti

. E; **V~HTED**

· STATES HoUSE OF' REPRESENTATIVES WASHIHGTQN,

O . C . 

### The Honorable Anthony Foxx Setreta(V . U . . S. Department 

### of Transportation .

· . . 

### '1200 New Jersey Avenue,

. SE **wa~hlnjton,** DC **20~90** Dear **secr~tary** Foxx: 

### JanLiary 1.7, 

### 2015



### N o . 

## 0 33 6 P . 1 JOINT ECONOMIC **CONNITT~£ GoMti!ITT£** 

**~** 9N WA Y, S AND MEI't.NS (;tt ... I RI'W'I

, SUDCOHiolmEE

1 QN t:IIJII.JH ' .Su. C ciMNITTI:E ON TiiADE **~8COioiMITTE,E** O,N ,SOCI,u.

· s£¢UA,1Tv .JO

I NT **CO~MI TTE:£**  ON TAXATION 

### M . V office 

### has continued 

### to monitor 

### the flllnss

· ln the 

### docl<et regardlns **Soutf'IW~$t's** pleac;llngs 

### to 

### ttw **Oep~r~me nt**  

### tO. **r~nwv~;~** 

### designci

. tlons granted to 

### :United and/or SkyWest sUch that 

### Southwest can enter the 

### Hobby- Mexico Cltv and Hobby 

### -lo

. s Cabos 

### markets. Slhce 

### my first **lett~** 

### to · 

### you 1 have remained **ln~erested**


### In this matter

, given the potential negative consequences to consumer$ end 

### the **unnecessa~v** Wlthd 

### ra.wai of 

### operatl

. llg 

### fights fror:n Ol')e 

### carrier for the



### ' benefit 

### of another

. After 

### carefully re.vlewlng 

### the tlmellne 

### and facts,

I **w~uld** re . quest 

### the

. Department simply 

### srant **Southw~st** 

### ~xtra·bha~era 

### authority for **~he** 

### 2.5 

### mohth period **lletwe~n t~~lr**  

### announced service 

### data and the 

### U.s. • Mexico agreement enactment date of 

# Januarv 1, 2016. Given the aJr 

### titrrier 

### and **co)l~~mer** 

### Impact, **~ltmg** w'th the timing **of't~e**

. U.s. 

### Mexico air 

### transport agreement, 

### this **arrang~ment** would 

### eliminate the 

### rieed for a costly, yet **utmece$~;;try,** route proceeding


### If the status quo 

### Is followed

. It Is 

### my understanding 

### that there 

### Is ample 

### precedent for 

### DOT to 

### gr.ant e><tra-bllater.al 

### authority 

### as both 

### U.S. and 

### Mexican **carrl~rs** were 

### granted such **a~tho~lY**

' In 1999, **;~long** with 

### subsequent examples

· tn more recent **ve~n·s** 

### between the two countries. **Ba~ed** 

### on tlmellne 

### and precedent.

I 

## want tQ 

### r:elterate **th~Uh~** Department 

### should use 

### the authority


### It has to grant **e>c tra~bilatetal**  

### authority to .Southwest 

### (or any carrier 

### for that 

### matter) so that

· all•lrllne

. s 

### can 

### partlc;;ipate In 

### ea<;h oftt,e Houston- Mexico City 

### and Houston -san 

### Jos@ del Cabo 

### rriai'lcets

. 

### This Is 

## a common sense solution that would 

### allow a . ll carrlers

· to
· S.erve 

### the **marl<~t** 

### ln question without disrupting exlstlns 

### services. Member of **Con~ress**
#### § 1008.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ralph Holty, Respondent, v Jewish Community Center, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed December 31, 1975, September 23, 1976 and April 22, 1977. The board found: "The employer had timely oral notice when claimant advised his immediate supervisor, Mr. Shayne, that he was ill during the period of time that he was helping clean out the basement and that he was going to the hospital, and that his immediate supervisor, Mr. Shayne, had knowledge of claimant’s accidental injury and claimant’s injury of July 26, 1972 is causally related to his employment.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Staley, Jr., and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
§ 1006.1020 Voluntary exclusion or voluntarily excluded. ( a ) *Voluntary exclusion* means a person's agreement to be excluded under the terms of a settlement between the person and one or more agencies. Voluntary exclusion must have governmentwide effect.
( b ) *Voluntarily excluded* means the status of a person who has agreed to a voluntary exclusion.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ground-water levels in theUnited States. North-central states.**
 
1956 | 1957-61 | 1962-66 | 1967-71 | 1972-74
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.13:
Item Number:0625 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104687
 
August 22, 2019
#### § 130.3 Armed forces.

*Armed forces* means the army, navy, marine, air force, or coast guard, as well as the national guard and national police, of a foreign country. This term also includes any military unit or military personnel organized under or assigned to an international organization.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Ju ly 19, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00161

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Andres GARCIA, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 15

- 322 Honorable Romero Molina, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State filed its appellant’s brief on May 25, 2016. Therefore, appellee’s brief was due June 24, 2016. However, on June 29, 2016, appellee’s appointed attorney, Mr. G. Allen
Ramirez, informed this court that he would file a response in writing stating appellee does not wish to contest the State’s appeal. Mr. Ramirez has filed neither his response, appellee’s brief,

nor a motion for extension of time.

It is therefore, ORDERED that M r

. Ramirez file either a (1) written response stating appellee does not contest the State’s request for relief as stated in the State’s appellant’s brief or (2) appellee’s brief no later than July 22, 2016

. I f M r . R amirez does not respond by July 22,

2016 , this cause will be abated for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether: (1) appell ee desires to file a responsive pleading to the State’s brief ; (2) appellant is indigent, and if so, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may incl ude the appointment of new counsel; and (3) counsel has abandoned the appeal. Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court will be asked to address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing.

The C lerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on M r

. R amirez by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by United State s mail. The Clerk of this court shall also fax a copy of this order to the presiding judge of the County Court at Law

, Starr County,

Texas._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 142.41 Application of this subpart.

Subpart D applies to postsecondary education programs and activities, including postsecondary vocational education programs or activities, that receive Federal financial assistance from the Department of State, and to recipients that operate, or that receive or benefit from Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                                  June 15, 2004



                              THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



               Delaware             001-02217             58-0628465
           (State or other         (Commission           (IRS Employer
             jurisdiction          File Number)        Identification No.)
          of incorporation)



              One Coca-Cola Plaza
                Atlanta, Georgia                            30313
    (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404)676-2121



<PAGE>



Item 5.  Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure

Attached as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference is a copy of a
press release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 15, 2004, regarding Irial
Finan.

Item 7(c).        Exhibits

Exhibit 99.1      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 15, 2004,
                  regarding Irial Finan.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                           THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                                             (REGISTRANT)


Date:  June 15, 2004                       By:/s/ Deval L. Patrick
                                              --------------------
                                              Deval L. Patrick
                                              Executive Vice President,
                                              General Counsel and Secretary



<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.
------------

Exhibit 99.1       Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated June 15, 2004,
                   regarding Irial Finan.
§ 403.7 Effective dates. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, this part shall be effective on the last business day in October 1987.
( b ) *Confirmations.* The requirements of §§ 403.4 and 403.5(d) to describe the specific securities that are the subject of a repurchase transaction, including the market value of such securities, on a confirmation at the initiation of a repurchase transaction or on substitution of other securities shall be effective January 31, 1988.
( c ) *Written repurchase agreements.* The requirement to obtain a repurchase agreement in writing with the provisions described in §§ 403.4 and 403.5(d) shall be effective October 31, 1987, in the case of new customers of a government securities broker or dealer and shall be effective January 31, 1988, in the case of existing customers of a government securities broker or dealer. For purposes of this paragraph, an “existing customer” of a government securities broker or dealer is any counterparty with whom the government securities broker or dealer has entered into a repurchase transaction on or after January 1, 1986, but before July 25, 1987. For purposes of this paragraph, a “new customer” of a government securities broker or dealer is any counterparty other than an existing customer.
[52 FR 27947, July 24, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 28986, Aug. 1, 1988; 79 FR 38456, July 8, 2014]
#### § 103.12 Reporting a violation.

If a person learns that a violation of the Convention, the CWCIA, this part, or the CWCR (15 CFR parts 710 through 722) has occurred or may occur, that person may notify: United States National Authority, Office of Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions, Bureau of Arms Control, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, Telephone: (703) 235-1204 or toll-free (877) CWC-NACS ((877) 292-6227), Facsimile: (703) 235-1065.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6740** 

EDWIN REEVES HAZEL, III , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. C. MCELVOGUE, Captain , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri ct of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 8:10

- cv - 00524

- RMG )

Submitted : August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, D AVIS , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III, Harry V. Ragsdale, CORRIGAN & CHANDLER, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, appeals the district court ’ s judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation granting summary judgment to Appellee Captain C. McElvogue, and dismissing Hazel’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint . We have reviewed the record and fin d no reversible

e rror. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hazel v. McElvo gue , No. 8:10

- cv - 00524

- RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2011)
. We grant McElvogue’s motion to strike c ertain affidavits from the docket
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
§ 1008.510 What actions will the Federal Government take against a recipient determined to have violated this part? If a recipient is determined to have violated this part, as described in § 1008.500 or § 1008.505, the Inter-American Foundation may take one or more of the following actions— ( a ) Suspension of payments under the award;
( b ) Suspension or termination of the award; and
( c ) Suspension or debarment of the recipient under 22 CFR part 1006, for a period not to exceed five years.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, William T. Gochnauer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2007 of RedEnvelope, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:September 14, 2007     *By:* */s/ WILLIAM T. GOCHNAUER*         *William T. Gochnauer*  *Interim Chief Financial Officer*
GOVERNOR OF MISSOURI JEFFERSON CITY JEREMIAHW. (JAYINIXON P.O. Box 720 GOVERNOR 65102 (573) 751-3222 July 15,2010

Karl Brooks, Ph.D. Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII 901 North 5th Street Kansas City, KS 66101
Dear Dr. Brooks:
Thank you for your agency's request for the State ofMissouri's position on EPA initiating actions to list the Washington County Lead-Furnace Creek Site on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). I understand a letter dated July 14; 2010 from Mark N. Templeton, Director ofthe Department ofNatural Resources, concurs with EPA's actions to proceed with listing the Washington County Lead Furnace Creek Site onthe Superfund National Priorities List.
It is my understanding that through the listing ofthe Washington County Lead Furnace Creek Site on the Superfund National Priorities List federal funds will be made available for the site. The expenditure ofthese federal funds will provide positive environmental outcomes and economic benefits to communities located in the Washington County Lead-Furnace Creek site. The state and local economies will be stimulated by the influx ofdollars and also by the potential beneficial reuse ofthese properties. Therefore, as Governor I concur with the department's recommendation.
Ifyou have any questions, please contact Mark N. Templeton, Director, Missouri Department ofNatural Resources, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176 orby phone at (573) 522-6221.

www.governor.mo.gov

### ,;>~;~~:"~;~,,,~c;**~;'l;'};;**

### ~~~'1~~t~

# (~/ ....• <';

# ".~**;.~/":** .. ' Jeremiah W Oay) Nixon, Governor • Mark N. Templeton, Director '

# D~~ T 

# QE;;**(',,~~{JT** 

# OF NATURAL RESOURCES

# -----\~~ttfl**~dmmo~'** JUL 14 2010

Karl Brooks, Ph.D. Regional Administrator 

## u.s. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 901 North 5th Street Kansas City, KS 66101
Dear Dr. Brooks:
Thank you for your agency's request for the State ofMissouri's position on whether the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should proceed with actions which could ultimately lead to inclusion ofthe Washington County Lead Furnace Creek Site (site) on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL).
As the Director ofthe Missouri Department ofNatural Resources, I agree that further environmental investigation and remediation are warranted at the site for protection ofpublic health, particularly children's health, and the environment. Therefore, I support and encourage the EPA's efforts in proceeding with actions, which could ultimately lead to inclusion ofthe site on the NPL. I ask that you continue to maintain close communications with the Department's Division ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ) as you proceed through this process. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Ms. Leanne Tippett Mosby, Acting Director, Division ofEnvironmental Quality, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176 or by phone at (573) 751-0763. Sincerely,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Mark N. Templeton Director

c: Leanne Tippett Mosby



# o Recycled Paper
Second Amendment to Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into effective the 1st day of February, 2006, by Novoste Corporation, a Florida corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and
Daniel G. Hall (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”). The Company and Executive are hereinafter referred to collectively, as the “Parties.” 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a Letter Agreement dated November 11, 2005, pursuant to which the date of Executive’s termination
of employment with the Company was established as December 31, 2005 and pursuant to which the Executive is entitled to receive certain payments upon the termination of his employment; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company amended the Letter Agreement effective
January 1, 2006, to extend the Executive’s employment termination date to January 31, 2006, and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to further extend Executive’s employment beyond January 31, 2006. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

1. Termination of Employment: The terms of paragraph 1 of the Letter Agreement shall be altered and amended so that the Executive shall continue
to be employed by the Company through February 28, 2006. 
  
 2. Certain Payments: Paragraph 2 of the letter Agreement, as amended, shall be further amended by adding the following paragraph: 
  

	 	(iv)	a fourth payment (the “Fourth Payment”) in the amount of $16,250, less applicable deductions, including, without limitation, federal and state withholding, to be paid on
February 28, 2006, provided, however, that the Executive shall not receive the Fourth Payment if the Executive voluntarily terminates employment with the Company prior to February 28, 2006. 








 3. All other and further terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect as entered into by the Parties on November 11, 2005. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment to the Letter Agreement as of the date indicated by their respective names. 
  

					
	Date:	 	 
		
	January 30, 2006	 	 /s/ Daniel G. Hall


	 	 	DANIEL G. HALL
		
	 	 	NOVOSTE CORPORATION
		
	Date:	 	 
			
	January 30, 2006	 	By:	 	 /s/ Alfred J. Novak


	 	 	Name:	 	Alfred J. Novak
	 	 	Title:	 	PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 30, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Brett A. Hickey                   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                  |
|                 |   | Brett A. Hickey                       |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
### §2832. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–568, §7(a), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2428

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §240, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 705, set forth provisions relating to Assistant Directors for Community Action.