alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Holland, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered February 25, 1959, convicting him, on his plea of guilty, of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve a term of three to four years. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000319

24-APR-2019

07:53 AM
§ 230.191 Definition of “issuer” in section 2(a)(4) of the Act in relation to asset-backed securities. The following applies with respect to asset-backed securities under the Act. Terms used in this section have the same meaning as in Item 1101 of Regulation AB (§ 229.1101 of this chapter). ( a ) The depositor for the asset-backed securities acting solely in its capacity as depositor to the issuing entity is the “issuer” for purposes of the asset-backed securities of that issuing entity.
( b ) The person acting in the capacity as the depositor specified in paragraph (a) of this section is a different “issuer” from that same person acting as a depositor for another issuing entity or for purposes of that person's own securities.
[70 FR 1615, Jan. 7, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CLOROX COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AS
PRESENTED IN THE CLOROX COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR SUCH PERIOD AND RESTATED HEREIN,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           84135
<SECURITIES>                                      5546
<RECEIVABLES>                                   413389
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1521
<INVENTORY>                                     211913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                782058
<PP&E>                                         1122667
<DEPRECIATION>                                  526374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3013350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1208434
<BONDS>                                         316260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        110844
<OTHER-SE>                                      974391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3013350
<SALES>                                        2741270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2741270
<CGS>                                          1192534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2203189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3546)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               69702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 471925
<INCOME-TAX>                                    173965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             297960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    297960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.82
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norberto Reyes, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 299]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), rendered on or about September 4, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

*117Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

HaroldG. Giomi certifies as follows:

1.               I am the Chief Executive Officer of The BankHoldings.

2.               The Form 10-Q of The Bank Holdings for theQuarter Ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TheBank Holdings.
| Date:  | November 14,  2006 |                                    |   | /s/ Hal Giomi |   |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------|--------|
|   |               | THE BANK  HOLDINGS                      |
|   |               | Harold G. Giomi                         |
|   |               | Chairman &  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AMOUNTS AND RATES OF BLUFF-TOP RECESSION ALONG THE LAKE MICHIGAN SHORELINE AT FORT SHERIDAN, ILLINOIS, FROM 1872-1987

*By***Randall W. Jibson**

**U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-231**

 

**Version 1.0**

This brief report is being released as a result of a public request for data  regarding amounts and rates of bluff-top recession at Fort Sheridan, Illinois,which is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline.
The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format. The latest    version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it.    If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge,    click here .OFR-03-231 HTML file(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2003/ofr-03-231/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:03 EDT 2013
#### § 130.2 Applicant.

*Applicant* means any person who applies to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls for any license or approval required under this subchapter for the export, reexport, or retransfer of defense articles or defense services valued in an amount of $500,000 or more which are being sold commercially to or for the use of the armed forces of a foreign country or international organization. This term also includes a person to whom the required license or approval has been given.

[81 FR 62008, Sept. 8, 2016]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 16

- 1464 Filed December 6, 2017

ROBERT JOHNATHAN DAVIS , Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mahaska County, Lucy J. Gamon , Judge.

Robert Davis appeals from the dismissal of his second application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

Jeffrey A

. Smith of Smith Law Firm , Oskaloosa , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ.2

DANILSON, Chief Judge

. R obert Davis appeals from the dismissal of his second application for postconviction relief . We find no error and affirm. After a jury trial, Davis was convicted of six counts of sexual
abuse. He was sentenced on November 21, 2008. His convictions and

s entence were affirmed on appeal. State v. Davis , No. 08

- 1942, 2009 WL 4116322, at *5

- 6 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2009). His application for further review was denied, and procedendo issued on March 11, 2010.
Davis ’s first application for postconviction relief was denied, and we affirmed the denial on appeal. Davis v. State , No. 12

- 0436, 2013 WL 530577, at
*1

- 2 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2013). Davis filed this second application for postconviction relief on October 17 , 2013, more than three years after pr ocedendo issued following his direct appeal

. The district court dismissed the application as time barred , and Davis appeals. “Generally, postconviction relief proceedings are reviewed for correction of errors at law.” Reilly v. Iowa Dist. Ct. , 783 N.W.2 d 490, 493 (Iowa 2010). We find no error in the summary dismissal of Davis’s application

. See Iowa Code § 822.6 (2013) (allowing summary dismissal where no purpose would be served by further proceedings). Because this application for postconviction re lief was filed more than thr ee years after procedendo issued, it is time barred unless the application raises “ a ground of fact or law that could
not have been raised within the applicable time period .” See id. § 822.3 (emphasis added) (stating “ applicati ons must be filed within three years from

. . . the date the writ of procedendo is issued ” but “ this limitation does not apply to a3

ground of fact or law that could not have been raised within the applicable time period ”)

. Davis contends he raises a new issue

. However, the issue raised 1
could have been raised within the applicable time period and is thus subject to
the three

- year limitation period. We affirm.
AFFIRMED.

1 Davis contends trial counsel was ineffective in a different respect than raised in his first application, that is, in failing to obtain the testimony of an expert witness

. He contends he did not know he could request the court to appoint an expert until recently. The three

- year statute of limitations would have no meaningful limitation if such a claim satisfied the exception.
§ 120.14 Licenses and related authorizations. ( a ) *Export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import, of defense articles.* The approval of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) must be requested and obtained before the export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import of a defense article, unless an exemption under the provisions of this subchapter is applicable.
( b ) *Furnishing defense services.* The approval of DDTC must be requested and obtained before a defense service may be furnished, unless an exemption under the provisions of this subchapter is applicable.
( c ) *Brokering activities.* The approval of DDTC must be requested and obtained before engaging in the business of brokering activities for the defense articles described in § 129.4(a) of this subchapter by a person who is required to register as a broker under part 129 of this subchapter, unless an exemption under the provisions of part 129 is applicable.
### §19312. Entrepreneurial leave program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall delegate to Directors the authority to carry out an entrepreneurial leave program (referred to in this section as the "program") to allow National Laboratory employees to take a full leave of absence from their position, with the option to return to that or a comparable position up to 3 years later, or a partial leave of absence, to advance the commercial application of energy and related technologies relevant to the mission of the Department.

#### (b) Termination authority

Directors shall retain the authority to terminate National Laboratory employees that participate in the program if such employees are found to violate terms prescribed by the National Laboratory at which such employee is employed.

#### (c) Licensing

To reduce barriers to participation in the program, the Secretary shall delegate to the Directors the requirement to establish streamlined mechanisms for facilitating the licensing of technology that is the focus of National Laboratory employees who participate in the program.

#### (d) Report

In accordance with section 16391a of this title, the Secretary shall report annually on the utilization of this authority at National Laboratories, including the number of employees who participate in this program at each National Laboratory and the number of employees who take a permanent leave from their positions at National Laboratories as a result of participating in this program.

#### (e) Federal ethics

Nothing in this section shall affect existing Federal ethics rules applicable to Federal personnel.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10719, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1707.)
```

[115th Congress Public Law 332]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4487]]

Public Law 115-332
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend title 28, United States Code, to permit other courts to 
  transfer certain cases to United States Tax Court. <<NOTE: Dec. 19, 
                         2018 -  [H.R. 3996]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Protecting 
Access to the Courts for Taxpayers Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 28 USC 1 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to the Courts for 
Taxpayers Act''.
SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CASES.

    Section 1631 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(or, for cases within the jurisdiction of the United States 
Tax Court, to that court)'' after ``any other such court''.

    Approved December 19, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3996:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-598 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Mar. 14, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 270.28b-1 Investment in loans partially or wholly guaranteed under the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, as amended. ( a ) The term *qualified investments* as used in section 28(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 shall include: ( 1 ) Any loan, any portion of which is guaranteed under Title III of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, as amended, and which is secured by a first lien on real estate: *Provided,* The amount of the loan not so guaranteed does not exceed 662 ⁄ 3 percent of the reasonable value of such real estate as determined by proper appraisal made by an appraiser designated by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs;
( 2 ) Any secondary loan the full amount of which is guaranteed under section 505(a) of Title III of the above mentioned act and which is secured by a second lien on real estate: *Provided, however,* That any such loan shall be deemed a qualified investment only so long as ( i ) insurance policies are required to be procured and maintained in an amount sufficient to protect the security against the risks or hazards to which it may be subjected to the extent customary in the locality, and
( ii ) the loan shall remain guaranteed under Title III of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, as amended, to the extent specified in paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section, as the case may be.
( b ) Loans made pursuant to this section shall be valued at the original principal amount of the loan less all payments made thereon which have been applied to the reduction of such principal amount.
(Secs. 28(b), 38, 54 Stat. 832, 841; 15 U.S.C. 80a-28(b), 80a-38)
[Rule N-28B-1, 11 FR 6483, June 13, 1946]
#### Murray L. Jacobs, Respondent, v. Michael Tuch Foundation, Inc., Appellant.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to deny the motion to strike out the second defense. We think the allegations of the second defense sufficient and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. ,P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 936.]
#### § 300.303 Report to trustee.

Promptly upon the expiration of 30 calendar days after the filing date, or if by the expiration of such 30-day period notice pursuant to section 8(a) of the Act of the commencement of proceedings has not been published, then as soon as practicable after publication of such notice, a broker or dealer who had executed transactions in securities out of which arose open contractual commitments with the debtor shall furnish to the trustee such information with respect to the buy-in, sell-out or other status of open contractual commitments as called for by Forms 300-A, B and C (§§ 301.300a-301.300c of this chapter) including appropriate supporting documentation and schedules.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BILLY JOE STOFAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00166

- CR

Appeal from the

109 th Judicial District Court

of Crane County, Texas

(TC# 1655)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 0 TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes JJ.
§ 122.1 Registration requirements. ( a ) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles, or furnishing defense services, is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls under § 122.2. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in such a business requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing a defense article or furnishing a defense service. A manufacturer who does not engage in exporting must nevertheless register. (*See* part 129 of this subchapter for requirements for registration of persons who engage in brokering activities.)
( b ) *Exemptions.* The registration requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to: ( 1 ) Officers and employees of the U.S. Government acting in an official capacity;
( 2 ) Persons whose pertinent business activity is confined to the production of unclassified technical data only;
( 3 ) Persons all of whose manufacturing and export activities are licensed under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; or
( 4 ) Persons who engage in the fabrication of articles solely for experimental or scientific purposes, including research and development. Note to paragraph ( b
):
Persons who qualify for the exemptions in paragraphs (b)(2) or (b)(4) of this section remain subject to the requirements for licenses or other approvals for exports of defense articles and defense services and may not receive an export license or approval unless registered under § 122.2.
( c ) *Purpose.* Registration is primarily a means to provide the U.S. Government with necessary information on who is involved in certain manufacturing and exporting activities. Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges. It is generally a precondition to the issuance of any license or other approval under this subchapter, unless an exception is granted by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
[78 FR 52686, Aug. 26, 2013]
A: Customer workers with PPE manually opens 

bags of CSA product mixture (containing 

approximately 30% PMN substance) and transfers 

to silo under negative pressure

ContainBusines

DENKA imports CSA product mixture containing approximately 30% 

PMN substance in 25-kg bags and delivers to customer

Fully enclosed, automated 

weighing and mixing system 

2: Dust to stack air

Cement mixture 

transferred to sealed 

mobile containers

other cement 

components

(e.g., cement, sand)

Fully enclosed packaging system

CSA mixed into cement mixture (containing 

approximately 1.5% PMN substance)

C: Users with PP

mixture (containin

1.5% PMN subst

concrete at cons

Users with 

PPE attach 

water supply 

and pump to 

mobile cement 

mixture 

container

Cement mixture (containing approximately 

1.5% PMN substance)

shipped in sealed containers to 

downstream users

B: Workers with PPE conduct cement 

mixing plant maintenance and shut 

down activities

3: Solids collected from inside mixing and other systems during maintenance activities to recycle/re-use or landfill

4: Hardened con

1: Dust to fugitive air

CSA

All dust collected is recycled/re-used

Dust 

collector
§ 1508.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the African Development Foundation grants an exception under § 1508.120.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     October 25, 2017





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---







ITEM 5.03 AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR BYLAWS;  CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR.


On October 25, 2017, the Board of Directors of registrant adopted and approved amended and restated By-Laws of registrant, which incorporate expanded advance notice requirements and an exclusive forum provision, in addition to other non-substantive changes.  The Amended and Restated By-Laws are filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this Form 8-K.











ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d)  ExhibitsExhibit No.Description3.1By-Laws of CNA Financial Corporation, as amended October 25, 2017.





























SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  October 25, 2017By/s/ Stathy Darcy(Signature)Stathy DarcySenior Vice President, Deputy GeneralCounsel & Secretary