alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.5 Violations. ( a ) *Refusal to permit entry or inspection.* No person may willfully fail or refuse to permit entry or inspection, or disrupt, delay or otherwise impede an inspection, authorized by the CWCIA.
( b ) *Failure to establish or maintain records.* No person may willfully fail or refuse: ( 1 ) To establish or maintain any record required by the CWCIA or the Chemical Weapons Convention Regulations (CWCR, 15 CFR parts 710 through 722) of the Department of Commerce; or
( 2 ) To submit any report, notice, or other information to the United States Government in accordance with the CWCIA or CWCR; or
( 3 ) To permit access to or copying of any record that is exempt from disclosure under the CWCIA or the CWCR.
#### Herbert S. Sisson, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel H. Hertzberg, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                           PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric C. Wong, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of RedEnvelope, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238.];

            (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

            (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

/s/ ERIC C. WONG
------------------------------------
Eric C. Wong
Chief Financial Officer

August 6, 2004
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4024 

To suspend approval of liquefied natural gas export terminals, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2012 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To suspend approval of liquefied natural gas export 

terminals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North America Nat5 ural Gas Security and Consumer Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF APPROVAL OF LNG EXPORT TERMI7 NALS. 

8 (a) SUSPENSION.—Before January 1, 2025, the Fed9 eral Energy Regulatory Commission may not approve any 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4024 IH

1 application under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 

2 U.S.C. 717b)— 

3 (1) for the siting, construction, expansion, or 

4 operation of an LNG terminal that will be used to 

5 receive, unload, load, store, transport, gasify, liquefy, 

6 or process natural gas to be exported to a foreign 

7 country from the United States; or 

8 (2) to amend an existing authorization of the 

9 Commission in order to modify an existing author10 ized facility to an LNG terminal that will be used 

11 to receive, unload, load, store, transport, gasify, liq12 uefy, or process natural gas to be exported to a for13 eign country from the United States. 

14 (b) EXEMPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not a apply 

15 with respect to any application described in subsection (a) 

16 if the natural gas that would be exported as a result of 

17 the approval of such application is exported solely to meet 

18 a requirement imposed pursuant to section 203 of the 

19 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

20 U.S.C. 1702), section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy 

21 Act (50 U.S.C. App. 5(b)), or part B of title II of the 

22 Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6271– 

23 6276). 

24 (c) DEFINITION OF LNG TERMINAL.—In this Act, 

25 the term ‘‘LNG terminal’’ has the meaning given such 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4024 IH

1 term in section 2(11) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

2 717a(11)). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §16491. Energy production incentives

#### (a) In general

A State may provide to any entity—

(1) a credit against any tax or fee owed to the State under a State law, or

(2) any other tax incentive,

determined by the State to be appropriate, in the amount calculated under and in accordance with a formula determined by the State, for production described in subsection (b) in the State by the entity that receives such credit or such incentive.

#### (b) Eligible entities

Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the production in the State of electricity from coal mined in the State and used in a facility, if such production meets all applicable Federal and State laws and if such facility uses scrubbers or other forms of clean coal technology.

#### (c) Effect on interstate commerce

Any action taken by a State in accordance with this section with respect to a tax or fee payable, or incentive applicable, for any period beginning after August 8, 2005, shall—

(1) be considered to be a reasonable regulation of commerce; and

(2) not be considered to impose an undue burden on interstate commerce or to otherwise impair, restrain, or discriminate, against interstate commerce.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XIV, §1402, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1061.)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Michael R. Gigante, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 351]

*603Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Following the loss of his job as a sales engineer, claimant began receiving unemployment insurance benefits after he filed an original claim, effective August 18, 2003. On November 3, 2003, claimant became a director and the corporate secretary of a closely held corporation formed with his wife and two acquaintances for the purpose of operating a restaurant franchise. Claimant continued to receive benefits after the corporation was formed but did not disclose the activities that he performed on its behalf when certifying for benefits. Following various proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately found that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed due to his involvement with the corporation. The Board further ruled that he was liable for a recoverable overpayment of $6,480 in benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 597 (4) and reduced his right to receive future benefits by 128 days. Claimant appeals.

“It is established that a corporate officer who performs business-related activities on behalf of an ongoing corporation will not be deemed totally unemployed even if he or she does not receive any income” *(Matter of Schmidt [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 899, 899 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 612 [2004] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Sarubbi [Commissioner of Labor],*9 AD3d 723 [2004]). In the case at hand, claimant was a signatory to the corporate checking account and signed at least 10 checks on its behalf to cover various expenses during the time period in question. In addition, he signed a corporate loan agreement, a guarantee of the lease for the corporate premises and a franchise agreement. Moreover, he was present at the first meeting of the board of directors and certified the corporate minutes in his capacity as secretary. He was also involved in the hiring of employees to operate the business and ultimately became the day manager in April 2004, at which time he no longer was certifying for benefits. In view of claimant’s activities, *604as well as the fact that he stood to benefit financially from the corporation’s continued existence *(see Matter of Michielson [Commissioner of Labor],*252 AD2d 624 [1998]), substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that he was not totally unemployed. Furthermore, given claimant’s failure to disclose his corporate affiliation when certifying for benefits despite his receipt of an informational booklet describing the reporting requirements, substantial evidence also supports the Board’s finding that he was liable for a recoverable overpayment *(see Matter of Rozestraten [Commissioner of Labor],*27 AD3d 864, 865 [2006]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### Howard A. Drescher, Respondent, v. Charles R. Agnello, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Anthony R. Drescher, Respondent v. Charles R. Agnello, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

All concur. (Appeal from an order denying motions by defendant Agnello to set aside verdicts in favor of plaintiffs Dresoher and for a new trial, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Dated: | November 2, 2020 | By   | /s/ Albert J. Miralles |   |
|   |   |   | Albert J. Miralles |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
#### Herman Gold, Respondent, v. Electrolux Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.
§ 232.106 Prohibition against electronic submissions containing executable code. ( a ) Electronic submissions must not contain executable code. Attempted submissions identified as containing executable code will be suspended, unless the executable code is contained only in one or more PDF documents, in which case the submission will be accepted but the PDF document(s) containing executable code will be deleted and not disseminated.
( b ) If an electronic submission has been accepted, and the Commission staff later determines that the accepted submission contains executable code, the staff may delete from the EDGAR system the entire accepted electronic submission or any document contained in the accepted electronic submission. The Commission staff may direct the electronic filer to resubmit electronically replacement document(s) or a replacement submission in its entirety, in compliance with this provision and the EDGAR Filer Manual.
Note to § 232.106 :
A violation of this section or the relevant EDGAR Filer Manual section also may be a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, as amended, and other statutes and laws.
[64 FR 27895, May 21, 1999]
§ 31.17 Records of leverage transactions. ( a ) Each leverage transaction merchant receiving a leverage customer's order shall immediately upon receipt thereof prepare a written record of such order, including the account identification and order number, and shall record thereon, by time-stamp or other timing device, the date and time, to the nearest minute, such order is received.
( b ) Each leverage transaction merchant executing the order of a leverage customer shall record on a written record of such order, including the account identification and order number, by time-stamp or other timing device, the date and time, to the nearest minute, such order is executed.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, the term “order” shall include, but not be limited to, any order for the purchase, sale, repurchase, resale, rescission, settlement by delivery, or liquidation of a leverage contract.
( d ) Each leverage transaction merchant shall establish and maintain a record of the bid and ask prices of each leverage contract on each leverage commodity that the leverage transaction merchant offers to sell or sells, or offers to purchase or purchases. The record shall include the times these prices were in effect to the nearest ten seconds.
(Secs. 8a(5) and 19 of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 12a(5) and 23 (1982))
[49 FR 5540, Feb. 13, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 34, Jan. 2, 1985]
### §§2463, 2464. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 2463, Pub. L. 95–76, §6, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 315; Pub. L. 103–437, §15(c)(3), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4592, related to authorization to contract for tracking and data relay satellite services and requirement to report to congressional committees. See section 30303 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 2464, Pub. L. 97–324, title I, §106(a), Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1600, related to recovery of fair value of placing Department of Defense payloads in orbit with Space Shuttle. See section 70101 of Title 51.
#### § 1006.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a participant if a principal of the transaction is excluded?

As an agency official, you may not enter into a covered transaction with a participant if you know that a principal of the transaction is excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 1006.120.
§ 275.206(4)-6 Proxy voting. If you are an investment adviser registered or required to be registered under section 203 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3), it is a fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act, practice or course of business within the meaning of section 206(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-6(4)), for you to exercise voting authority with respect to client securities, unless you: ( a ) Adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that you vote client securities in the best interest of clients, which procedures must include how you address material conflicts that may arise between your interests and those of your clients;
( b ) Disclose to clients how they may obtain information from you about how you voted with respect to their securities; and
( c ) Describe to clients your proxy voting policies and procedures and, upon request, furnish a copy of the policies and procedures to the requesting client.
[68 FR 6593, Feb. 7, 2003]
| **Organization Review Narrative (Details) $ in Millions** | 12 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]**       |            |
| Restructuring Costs                                       | $ 19            |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_RestructuringAndRelatedActivitiesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount, after cash payment, of expenses associated with exit or disposal activities pursuant to an authorized plan. Excludes expenses related to a discontinued operation or an asset retirement obligation.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 230 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 28 -Subparagraph (b) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=66902209&loc=d3e3602-108585
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_RestructuringCosts**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
# 3422.1002-1 General.

Consistent with 29 CFR 4.145, the five-year limitation set forth in the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended (Service Contact Act), applies to each period of the contract individually, not the cumulative period of base and option periods. Accordingly, no contract subject to the Service Contract Act issued by the Department of Education will have a base period or option period that exceeds five years.     

**Parent topic:**Subpart 3422.10—Service Contract Labor Standards
### §194. Quarters for bureau

The Secretary of Health and Human Services is directed to furnish sufficient quarters for the work of this bureau at an annual rental not to exceed $2,000.

(Apr. 9, 1912, ch. 73, §4, 37 Stat. 80; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7873, 60 Stat. 1095; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 18c of Title 29, Labor.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

"Secretary of Labor" substituted for "Secretary of Commerce and Labor" pursuant to act Mar. 4, 1913. See note set out under section 191 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.

"Federal Security Administrator" substituted for "Secretary of Labor" pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1946. See note set out under section 191 of this title.
#### § 1002.2 Definitions.

As used in this part, the following words have the meaning set forth below:

*Act.* “Act” means the Act of June 5, 1967, sometimes referred to as the “Freedom of Information Act” or the Public Information Section of the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended, Pub. L. 90-23, 81 Stat. 54, and codified at 5 U.S.C. 552.

*Foundation.* “Foundation” means the Inter-American Foundation.

*President.* “President” means the President of the Foundation.

*Records.* The word “records” includes all books, papers, or other documentary materials made or received by the Foundation in connection with the transaction of its business which have been preserved or are appropriate for preservation by the Foundation as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities, or because of the informational value of data contained therein. Library or other material acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, and stocks of publications and processed documents are not included within the definition of the word “records.”