alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4188 

To reduce the discretionary spending limit for the Department of Defense 

for fiscal year 2013 by an amount equal to the amount obligated by 

the Department in fiscal year 2012 to provide recreational facilities 

to Guantanamo detainees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2012 

Mr. ROSS of Florida (for himself, Mrs. ADAMS, and Mr. RIBBLE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, 

and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce the discretionary spending limit for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 by an amount 

equal to the amount obligated by the Department in 

fiscal year 2012 to provide recreational facilities to 

Guantanamo detainees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4188 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘None of Our Funds 

3 in the Interest or for the Exercise or Leisure of Detainees 

4 Act’’ or the ‘‘NO FIELD Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING USE OF FUNDS 

6 FOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR GUAN7 TANAMO DETAINEES. 

8 It is the sense of the Congress that the Department 

9 of Defense should not use taxpayer funds to provide rec10 reational facilities for individuals detained at United 

11 States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

12 SEC. 3. REDUCTION OF DOD DISCRETIONARY SPENDING 

13 LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013. 

14 The discretionary spending limit for the security cat15 egory for fiscal year 2013 in section 251(c)(2)(A) of the 

16 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 

17 1985 (as revised pursuant to section 251A(2) of such Act) 

18 is reduced by $750,000. 

19 SEC. 4. USE OF SAVINGS FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION. 

20 Any savings to the Federal Government resulting 

21 from section 3 shall be retained in the Treasury for pur22 poses of deficit reduction. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power,  Inc. (the “Company”)  on Form 10-Q for the six months ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I Mehboob Charania, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.




March 17, 2011


/s/ Mehboob CharaniaMehboob CharaniaChief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,801
<PP&E>                                         116,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,593)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,371
<BONDS>                                         30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,229
<SALES>                                         45,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,174
<CGS>                                           32,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,255
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
# Dziennik Urzędowy L 198/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0766 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | L 198 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Legislacja | Rocznik 616 sierpnia 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0766

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

L 198

Wydanie polskie

Legislacja

Rocznik 616 sierpnia 2018

---

| Spis treści | | II   Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE |
| | * | Zawiadomienie o wejściu w życie Protokołu między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi a Republiką Libańską, ustanawiającego mechanizm rozstrzygania sporów mający zastosowanie do sporów dotyczących postanowień handlowych Układu eurośródziemnomorskiego ustanawiającego stowarzyszenie między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi, z jednej strony, a Republiką Libańską, z drugiej strony | 1 |

Spis treści

II   Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym

Strona

UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE

*

Zawiadomienie o wejściu w życie Protokołu między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi a Republiką Libańską, ustanawiającego mechanizm rozstrzygania sporów mający zastosowanie do sporów dotyczących postanowień handlowych Układu eurośródziemnomorskiego ustanawiającego stowarzyszenie między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi, z jednej strony, a Republiką Libańską, z drugiej strony

1

| PL | Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.
  Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną. |
| --- | --- |

PL

Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.

Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną.

---

II Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym

UMOWY MIĘDZYNARODOWE

| 6.8.2018 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | L 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2018

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

L 198/1

---

Zawiadomienie o wejściu w życie Protokołu między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi a Republiką Libańską, ustanawiającego mechanizm rozstrzygania sporów mający zastosowanie do sporów dotyczących postanowień handlowych Układu eurośródziemnomorskiego ustanawiającego stowarzyszenie między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi, z jednej strony, a Republiką Libańską, z drugiej strony

Protokół między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi a Republiką Libańską, ustanawiający mechanizm rozstrzygania sporów mający zastosowanie do sporów dotyczących postanowień handlowych Układu eurośródziemnomorskiego ustanawiającego stowarzyszenie między Wspólnotą Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi, z jednej strony, a Republiką Libańską, z drugiej strony, podpisany w Brukseli w dniu 11 listopada 2010 r., wejdzie w życie, zgodnie z art. 23 tego protokołu, w dniu 1 września 2018 r.

---
(logo)**SitusAMC**

 

**MANAGEMENT'S REPORTON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

** **

** **

1.Situs Real LLC (the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of SitusAMC HoldingsCorporation (“SitusAMC”), is responsible for assessing compliance with theservicing criteria applicable to it in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(A-B) of Regulation ABof the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by thisreport (collectively referred to as “EU Reporting Administrator Platform” orthe “Platform”) include asset-backed securities for which Situs Real LLC actedin the capacity of the EU Reporting Administrator related to the followingasset-backed transactions and securities: BMARK 2019-B10 and BMARK 2019-B11.

 

2.The Company used the criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(A-B) ofRegulation AB “Reports to investors, including those to be filed with theCommission, are maintained in accordance with the transaction agreements andapplicable Commission requirements. Specifically, such reports: (A) Areprepared in accordance with timeframes and other terms set forth in the transactionagreements; (B) Provide information calculated in accordance with the termsspecified in the transaction agreements” to provide an assertion on theCompany’s assessment of compliance.

 

3.Situs Real LLC has complied in all material aspects, with the applicableservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(A-B) of Regulation AB, as ofand for the year ended December 31, 2023 and for the Reporting Period withrespect to the Platform;

 

4.Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, hasissued an attestation report on the Company’s assertion on compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.

 

SitusReal LLC

March1, 2024

 

/s/Parker Umsted

ParkerUmsted, Senior Director, Securitization
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 142.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which is designed to eliminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
§ 1104.9 Suspension and revocation of permits. ( a ) *Suspension or revocation for cause.* ( 1 ) The Commissioner may suspend a permit issued pursuant to this part upon determining that the permittee has failed to meet any of the terms and conditions of the permit or has violated any prohibition of the Act or § 1104.3. The Commissioner shall provide written notice to the permittee of the suspension, the cause thereof, and the requirements which must be met before the suspension will be removed.
( 2 ) The Commissioner may revoke a permit upon assessment of a civil penalty under § 1104.14 upon the permittee's conviction under section 6 of the Act, or upon determining that the permittee has failed after notice under this section to correct the situation which led to suspension of the permit.
( b ) *Suspension or revocation for management purposes.* The Commissioner may suspend or revoke a permit, without liability to the United States, its agents, or employees, when continuation of work under the permit would be in conflict with management requirements not in effect when the permit was issued. The Commissioner shall provide written notice to the permittee stating the nature of and basis for the suspension or revocation.
#### § 247.100 Definition.

For purposes of this part the following definition shall apply: *Act* means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*).
§ 1101.2 Definitions. For the purpose of these regulations: ( a ) *Act* means the Privacy Act of 1974.
( b ) *Agency* is defined to include any executive department, military department, Government corporation, Government controlled corporation or other establishment in the executive branch of the Government (including the Executive Office of the President, or any independent regulatory agency) (5 U.S.C. 552)).
( c ) *Commission* means the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico.
( d ) *Commissioner* means head of the United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico.
( e ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
( f ) *Maintain* includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate.
( g ) *Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph.
( h ) *Routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it is collected.
( i ) *Section* means the United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico.
( j ) *Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by 13 U.S.C. 8 (Census data).
( k ) *System of records* means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear at 68 FR 51359, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 142.70 Procedures.

The procedural provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to this part. These procedures are found in 22 CFR subchapter O, part 141.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 7189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9906-31-Region-2]

Proposed CERCLA Settlements Relating to the Sherwin-Williams Site 
in Gibbsboro, Camden County, New Jersey

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed administrative settlement and opportunity 
for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (``CERCLA''), notice is hereby given by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (``EPA''), Region 2, of a proposed Administrative 
Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs 
(``Agreement'') pursuant to Section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA with the 
Sherwin-Williams Company (``Settling Party''). The Settling Party is a 
potentially responsible party, pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 
and thus is potentially liable for response costs incurred at or in 
connection with the Sherwin-Williams Site (``Site''), located in 
Gibbsboro, Camden County, New Jersey. Under the Agreement, the Settling 
Party agrees to pay a total of $104,000.00 to EPA for past response 
costs. EPA will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the Agreement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations that indicate that the proposed Agreement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. EPA's response to any comments 
received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region 2 
offices, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866.

DATES: Comments must be provided by March 10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The Agreement is available for public inspection at EPA 
Region 2 offices at 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866. 
Comments should reference the Sherwin-Williams Site, located in 
Gibbsboro, Camden County, New Jersey, Index Nos. CERCLA-02-2014-2002. 
To request a copy of the Agreements, please contact the EPA employee 
identified below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Howard, Assistant Regional 
Counsel, New Jersey Superfund Branch, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway--17th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866. Telephone: 212-637-3216, email at 
howard.carl@epa.gov.

    Dated: January 15, 2014.
Walter E. Mugdan,
Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-02608 Filed 2-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
SCWC-28948

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

PACIFIC LIGHTNET, INC., 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

TIME WARNER TELECOM, INC., and TIME WARNER TELECOM OF HAWAII

L.P., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

(Civil No. 03-1-2557)

PACIFIC LIGHTNET, INC., 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

TIME WARNER TELECOM OF HAWAII L.P. a Delaware limited

partnership, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

and

ALVEN KAMP, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

(Civil No. 05-1-0428)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NOS. 28948 and 29105; CIVIL NOS. 03-1-2557 and 05-1-0428)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April

22, 2013 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Pacific

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-28948

29-MAY-2013

11:25 AM
Lightnet, Inc. is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral

argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk

regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 29, 2013.

Margery S. Bronster, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

Rex Y. Fujichaku, 

for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

J. Douglas Ing, /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Brian A. Kang, 

and Emi L.M. Kaimuloa, /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

for respondent

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4197 

To extend the authority to provide loan guarantees to Israel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2012 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself and Mr. BERMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the authority to provide loan guarantees to Israel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE LOAN 

4 GUARANTEES TO ISRAEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 5 of title I of the Emer6 gency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 

7 (Public Law 108–11), as amended, is further amended in 

8 the item relating to ‘‘LOAN GUARANTEES TO ISRAEL’’— 

9 (1) in the matter preceding the first proviso, by 

10 striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep11 tember 30, 2015’’; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4197 IH

1 (2) in the second proviso, by striking ‘‘Sep2 tember 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

3 2015’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section take effect as of September 30, 2011. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4038 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 4-year extension 

of the deduction for tuition and related expenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2012 

Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Ms. WATERS, Mr. CICILLINE, and Mr. ELLISON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a 4-year extension of the deduction for tuition and related expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American College Tui5 tion Tax Relief Act of 2012’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4038 IH

1 SEC. 2. 4-YEAR EXTENSION OF SECTION 222 DEDUCTION 

2 FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EX3 PENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 222 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified 

6 tuition and related expenses) is amended by striking ‘‘De7 cember 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2 - 10 - 213 - CV

DONALD P. PRENTISS, JR. APPELLANT
V. ADRIENNE L. PRENTISS APPELLEE

------------ FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ Appellant Donald P. Prentiss, Jr. filed a pro se notice of appeal of a “[j]udgment rendered May 21, 2010.” On June 24, 2010, we notified Donald th at he had prematurely filed the notice of appeal because the trial court has not signed a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order and that we would
d ismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless the parties furnished the court
with a signed copy of the order that Donald seeks to appeal by July 14, 2010

.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a) , 44.3 . We have not received a response.
Because there is n o final judgment or appealable interlocutory order in this case , we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T ex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Robertson v. Beadles , Newman & Lawler, P.C. , No. 02

- 08

- 00382

- CV, 2009 WL 51034, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Wo rth Jan. 8, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because of no final judgment or appealable order). PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: A ugust 19 , 2010
#### George Sutter et al., appellees, v. Carl Christiansen et al., on appeal of Carl Christiansen, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,079.

Action for damage to plaintiffs’ personal property by a wall on defendants’ property falling on it. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph H. Pitch, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 29, 1922.

William J. Lacey, for appellant. Gustav E. Beerly, for appellees; Ellis S. Chesbrough, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 50.11-50.24 [Reserved]