alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 37.1500 Core Principle 15—Designation of chief compliance officer. ( a ) *In general.* Each swap execution facility shall designate an individual to serve as a chief compliance officer.
( b ) *Duties.* The chief compliance officer shall: ( 1 ) Report directly to the board or to the senior officer of the facility;
( 2 ) Review compliance with the core principles in this subsection;
( 3 ) In consultation with the board of the facility, a body performing a function similar to that of a board, or the senior officer of the facility, resolve any conflicts of interest that may arise;
( 4 ) Be responsible for establishing and administering the policies and procedures required to be established pursuant to this section;
( 5 ) Ensure compliance with the Act and the rules and regulations issued under the Act, including rules prescribed by the Commission pursuant to section 5h of the Act; and
( 6 ) Establish procedures for the remediation of noncompliance issues found during compliance office reviews, look backs, internal or external audit findings, self-reported errors, or through validated complaints.
( c ) *Requirements for procedures.* In establishing procedures under paragraph (b)(6) of this section, the chief compliance officer shall design the procedures to establish the handling, management response, remediation, retesting, and closing of noncompliance issues.
( d ) *Annual reports* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In accordance with rules prescribed by the Commission, the chief compliance officer shall annually prepare and sign a report that contains a description of: ( i ) The compliance of the swap execution facility with the Act; and
( ii ) The policies and procedures, including the code of ethics and conflict of interest policies, of the swap execution facility.
( 2 ) *Requirements.* The chief compliance officer shall: ( i ) Submit each report described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section with the appropriate financial report of the swap execution facility that is required to be submitted to the Commission pursuant to section 5h of the Act; and
( ii ) Include in the report a certification that, under penalty of law, the report is accurate and complete.
Editorial Note on Part 49
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

§ 49.21 Conflicts of interest (Core Principle 3). ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each swap data repository shall establish and enforce rules to minimize conflicts of interest in the decision-making process of the swap data repository, and establish a process for resolving such conflicts of interest.
( 2 ) Nothing in this section shall supersede any requirement applicable to the swap data repository pursuant to § 49.20 of this part.
( b ) *Policies and procedures.* ( 1 ) Each swap data repository shall establish, maintain, and enforce written procedures to: ( i ) Identify, on an ongoing basis, existing and potential conflicts of interest; and
( ii ) Make decisions in the event of a conflict of interest. Such procedures shall include rules regarding the recusal, in applicable circumstances, of parties involved in the making of decisions.
( 2 ) As further described in § 49.20 of this part, the chief compliance officer of the swap data repository shall, in consultation with the board of directors or a senior officer of the swap data repository, as applicable, resolve any such conflicts of interest.
( c ) *Compliance with core principle.* The chief compliance officer of the swap data repository shall review the compliance of the swap data repository with this core principle.
#### § 1006.130 Does exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement transactions?

If any Federal agency excludes a person under the FAR on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible to participate in nonprocurement covered transactions under this part. Therefore, an exclusion under the FAR has reciprocal effect in Federal nonprocurement transactions.
§ 130.15 Confidential business information. ( a ) Any person who is required to furnish information under this part may identify any information furnished hereunder which the person considers to be confidential business information. No person, including any applicant or supplier, shall publish, divulge, disclose, or make known in any manner, any information so identified by a vendor or other person unless authorized by law or regulation.
( b ) For purposes of this section, *confidential business information* means commercial or financial information which by law is entitled to protection from disclosure. (See, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (3) and (4); 18 U.S.C. 1905; 22 U.S.C. 2778(e); Rule 26(c)(7), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
### §2238. Continued operation of facilities

Whenever the Commission finds that the public convenience and necessity or the production program of the Commission requires continued operation of a production facility or utilization facility the license for which has been revoked pursuant to section 2236 of this title, the Commission may, after consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency, State or Federal, having jurisdiction, order that possession be taken of and such facility be operated for such period of time as the public convenience and necessity or the production program of the Commission may, in the judgment of the Commission, require, or until a license for the operation of the facility shall become effective. Just compensation shall be paid for the use of the facility.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §188, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 955; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)
### §1997h. Notice to Federal departments

At the time of notification of the commencement of an investigation of an institution under section 1997a of this title or of the notification of an intention to file a motion to intervene under section 1997c of this title, and if the relevant institution receives Federal financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of Education, the Attorney General shall notify the appropriate Secretary of the action and the reasons for such action and shall consult with such officials. Following such consultation, the Attorney General may proceed with an action under this subchapter if the Attorney General is satisfied that such action is consistent with the policies and goals of the executive branch.

(Pub. L. 96–247, §10, May 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 354; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VIII, §803(f)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–73; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–134 substituted "the action" for "his action" and "the Attorney General is satisfied" for "he is satisfied".
### §16314. Hydrogen

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall conduct a program of fundamental research and development in support of programs authorized under subchapter VIII.

#### (b) Methods

The program shall include support for methods of generating hydrogen without the use of natural gas.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §974, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 903.)
##### 



Exhibit 15.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement, as amended (Form
S-8 333-107766), pertaining to securities offered under the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan of
Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. of our report dated February 18, 2005 (except for the
information in note 28 for which the date is April 13, 2005), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004. (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS) Taichung, Taiwan Republic of China June 9, 2005
(logo) **PACIFIC LIFE**

 

 

**MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ONASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA**

 

 

Pacific Life Insurance Company(the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance, as of and for theyear ended December 31, 2021, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d) of the SEC’s Regulation AB, excluding the criteria set forth inItem 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii),(d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x),(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv), which theAsserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the activities it performs,with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report(such criteria, after giving effect to the exclusions identified above, the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The transactions covered by this reportinclude all asset-backed transactions under the Securitized Commercial MortgageLoans Platform (the “Platform”), as listed in Appendix A.

 

The Asserting Party has usedthe criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB in orderto assess the effectiveness of Pacific Life Insurance Company’s compliance withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,2021. The Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied, in all materialrespects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2021, with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reportfor the Platform on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 as set forth in thisassertion.

 

Pacific Life Insurance Company

 

/s/ Edwin Ferrell

Edwin FerrellVP, Investment Management 

February 18, 2022

 

 

**APPENDIX A**

 

**SECURITIZED COMMERCIALMORTGAGE LOANS PLATFORM**

 

**Trust Name**                                                                          **Loan Name**

 

COMM2014-277P                                                               277 Park Avenue 

HGMT2015-HGLR                                                              Houston Galleria Mall 

DBJPM 2016–SFC                                                               Westfield San Francisco Center 

JPM 2015 – WPG                                                                 Scottsdale Quarter

BMARK 2019 –B12                                                             Woodlands Mall

CSMC2020-WEST                                                               Westchester Mall

 

 

**PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCECOMPANY**

700 Newport Center Drive,Newport Beach, California 92660-6397
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Cole, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert L. Cole                             Date May 15, 2006
--------------------------------
Robert L. Cole
Chief Executive Officer

                                       23
#### In the Matter of City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Certain Interests in the Carousel Center Site for the Phased Public Project Known as DestiNY USA. The Gap, Inc., Doing Business as Old Navy, Appellant; Carousel Center Company, L.P., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[821 NYS2d 513]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V Centra, J.), entered May 12, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 4. The order, among other things, denied the motion of respondent The Gap, Inc., doing business as Old Navy, to dismiss the petition, granted the petition and authorized petitioner to acquire by condemnation certain Carousel Center interests of that respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc.*— Carousel *Ctr. Co.,*L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]).

All concur except Hurlbutt, J.E, who dissents and votes to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting memorandum as in *Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc.*— Carousel *Ctr. Co.,*L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
#### Frances M. Watts, as Administratrix of the Estate of Stanley Watts, Deceased, Appellant, v. Mitchell Bros. Realty Corporation, Respondent.

*(Maher*v. *Madison Sq. Garden Corp.,*242 N. Y. 506.) Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MaeCrate, *764JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion for a directed verdict, on the ground that the proof adduced presented an issue of fact for determination by the jury.
#### Bruno Hess, Appellant, v. Crotty Mfg. Corp. et al., Respondents.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Exhibit 32.1
                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "
Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 14, 2007                              By: /s/Carmine N. Stella
                                                         -----------------
                                                  Name:  Carmine N. Stella
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


            In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital
Beverage Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "
Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 14, 2007                              By: /s/Carol Russell
                                                         -------------
                                                  Name:  Carol Russell
                                                  Title: Treasurer
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 25, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00305-CR

ROBERT RICHARD LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1504752

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Robert Richard Lopez was indicted for aggravated assault of a 

family member. Pursuant to a charge-bargain agreement with the State, appellant 

pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of deadly conduct. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 

22.05(b)(2). The trial court entered an order of deferred adjudication, placing 

appellant on community supervision for two years. Although a defendant usually 

has no right of appeal in a charge-bargain case, the trial court gave appellant 
2

permission to appeal the issue of whether the indictment should be set aside. 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 11, 2016. 

On August 9, 2016, this court ordered a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s counsel had not filed a brief in this appeal. The trial court conducted 

the hearing on August 15, 2016. At the hearing, appellant stated he no longer 

wished to pursue his appeal.

Appellant has not filed a written motion to withdraw the appeal or a written 

motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon 

the testimony at the hearing that appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we 

conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Summary of Atlanta Public Meeting- Discuss Fuel Cycle Cyber Security Draft Proposed Rule and Guidance

Accession Number: ML16092A124

Date Released: Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16095A315 - 3-17-16 Memo for Cyber Security Meeting Summary. (2 page(s), 4/7/2016)
    - ML16095A318 - 3-17-16 Enclosure 1 Meeting Summary Regarding The Proposed Cyber Security Rulemaking At Fuel Cycle Facilities. (5 page(s), 4/7/2016)
    - ML16095A320 - 3-17-16 Enclosure 2 - Attendees List. (2 page(s), 4/7/2016)
    - ML16095A325 - 3-17-16 Enclosure 3-Slides for Cyber Security Meeting. (47 page(s), 4/7/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 18, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                        
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                                     |                                        
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                      
|                                     | Connie Coffey                          
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate    
|                                     | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
#### JIMMY MAHONEY and JUDY MAHONEY v. RONNIE’S ROAD SERVICE, INDIAN HEAD INDUSTRIES, INC., MGM BRAKES

No. 171A96

(Filed 7 March 1997)

Appeal by plaintiffs pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 122 N.C. App. 150, 468 S.E.2d 279 (1996), affirming an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Indian Head Industries and MGM Brakes entered on 19 May 1994 by Stephens (Donald W.), J., in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1997.

*Twiggs, Abrams, Strickland, & Trehy, P.A., by Douglas B. Abrams; and Gate & Mathers, Ltd., by Martin H. Mathers, for plaintiff-appellants.*

*Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P., by Kirk G. Warner and Gwenda L. Laws, for defendant-appellees Indian Head Industries and MGM Brakes.*

*Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., by James G. Exum, Jr., Bynum M. Hunter, and John J. Korzen, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice PARKER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.