alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,965,275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,995,826
<PP&E>                                       2,644,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,992)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,636,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,480,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,636,174
<SALES>                                         79,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,354
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §2190. Saving clause for prior patent applications

Any patent application on which a patent was denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office under sections 1811(a)(1), 1811(a)(2), or 1811(b) 1 of this title, and which is not prohibited by section 2181 or 2185 of this title may be reinstated upon application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks within one year after August 30, 1954 and shall then be deemed to have been continuously pending since its original filing date: Provided, however, That no patent issued upon any patent application so reinstated shall in any way furnish a basis of claim against the Government of the United States.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §160, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 948; amended Pub. L. 93–596, §3, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 1811(a)(1), 1811(a)(2), and 1811(b) of this title, referred to in text, were omitted from the Code in the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946 (which was classified to section 1801 et seq. of this title) by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, 68 Stat. 919.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Patent Office and Commissioner of Patents changed to Patent and Trademark Office and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, respectively, pursuant to Pub. L. 93–596, §3, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

1 See References in Text note below.
Subpart 508.4 - Federal Supply Schedules

Parent topic: Part 508 - Required Sources of Supplies And Services

508.403 Applicability

This section establishes special ordering procedures when considering use of LPTA.

(a) Evaluation of FSS contract price. GSA performs a technical evaluation in products and services

prior to awarding the item on the FSS contract. This evaluation ensures orders placed against FSS

contracts satisfy the requirements of Section 880 of the John S. McCain National Defense

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232, 41 U.S.C. 3701).

(b) Evaluation of order/BPA price. The contracting officer may base their award determination on

the level of effort and price as described in FAR 8.405-2(d) when purchasing services. If the

contracting officer is purchasing supplies, price can still be the dominant factor. When purchasing

more complex services or supplies, the contracting officer should engage in a best value tradeoff

when evaluating the factors.

(1)Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) from a medical context, such as gloves and masks, may be

purchased using LPTA. PPE from a law enforcement context, such as body armor, should not be

procured through LPTA.

(2)Information technology services should not be procured through LPTA.

(3)Professional services should not be procured on an LPTA basis.

(4)Cyber-security services should not be procured on an LPTA basis.

(c) Documentation. Ordering activities may use LPTA when evaluating quotes for FSS orders or

BPAs without further justification other than documenting the evaluation methodology per FAR

8.405-2(f)(4). As used in this subpart, issuing an FSS order or BPA does not require the file

documentation for LPTA described in GSAM 515.101-2 or GSAM 4 516.505, however the

Contracting Officer should appropriately document their award decision as described in FAR

8.405-1(g)(5) and FAR 8.405-2(d).

508.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.

Although FAR 19 (except for the requirement at 19.202-1(e)(1)(iii)) does not apply to BPAs or orders

placed against Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts, they are not exempt from part 519.

508.405 Ordering procedures for Federal Supply Schedules.

(a)For a D&F for a single award Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with an estimated value

exceeding $100 million, the D&F must be approved by the HCA
(b)COs shall follow the INFORM procedures in 515.370 for all applicable orders and BPAs.
Exhibit 32.2  Section 1350 certification of principal financial officer   I, Alan J. Sandler, Secretary to the Board, Vice President and principal financial officer, of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  1.
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   August 16, 2010/s/ Alan J. SandlerName: Alan J. Sandler
Title: Secretary to the Board, Vice President and principal financial officer
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
§ 38.350 Core Principle 6. The board of trade, in consultation or cooperation with the Commission, shall adopt rules to provide for the exercise of emergency authority, as is necessary and appropriate, including the authority: ( a ) To liquidate or transfer open positions in any contract;
( b ) To suspend or curtail trading in any contract; and
( c ) To require market participants in any contract to meet special margin requirements.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH BILLINGSLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00395-JCC-3; 1:07-cv-00185-JCC)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Billingsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, 

Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mark 

Alex Grider, Tino Martin Lisella, Luis Morales, Melissa Siskind, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Billingsley seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion

as successive and time-barred. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Billingsley has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15d-20 Plain English presentation of specified information. ( a ) Any information included or incorporated by reference in a report filed under section 15(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 402, 403, 404 or 407 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.402, § 229.403, § 229.404 or § 229.407 of this chapter) must be presented in a clear, concise and understandable manner. You must prepare the disclosure using the following standards: ( 1 ) Present information in clear, concise sections, paragraphs and sentences;
( 2 ) Use short sentences;
( 3 ) Use definite, concrete, everyday words;
( 4 ) Use the active voice;
( 5 ) Avoid multiple negatives;
( 6 ) Use descriptive headings and subheadings;
( 7 ) Use a tabular presentation or bullet lists for complex material, wherever possible;
( 8 ) Avoid legal jargon and highly technical business and other terminology;
( 9 ) Avoid frequent reliance on glossaries or defined terms as the primary means of explaining information. Define terms in a glossary or other section of the document only if the meaning is unclear from the context. Use a glossary only if it facilitates understanding of the disclosure; and
( 10 ) In designing the presentation of the information you may include pictures, logos, charts, graphs and other design elements so long as the design is not misleading and the required information is clear. You are encouraged to use tables, schedules, charts and graphic illustrations that present relevant data in an understandable manner, so long as such presentations are consistent with applicable disclosure requirements and consistent with other information in the document. You must draw graphs and charts to scale. Any information you provide must not be misleading.
( b ) [Reserved]
Note to § 240.15 d
-20:
In drafting the disclosure to comply with this section, you should avoid the following: 1. Legalistic or overly complex presentations that make the substance of the disclosure difficult to understand; 2. Vague “boilerplate” explanations that are imprecise and readily subject to different interpretations; 3. Complex information copied directly from legal documents without any clear and concise explanation of the provision(s); and 4. Disclosure repeated in different sections of the document that increases the size of the document but does not enhance the quality of the information.
[71 FR 53263, Sept. 8, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 979, Jan. 4, 2008]
§ 1006.115 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions? With the exceptions stated in §§ 1006.120, 1006.315, and 1006.420, a person who is excluded by the Inter-American Foundation or any other Federal agency may not: ( a ) Be a participant in a(n) Inter-American Foundation transaction that is a covered transaction under subpart B of this part;
( b ) Be a participant in a transaction of any other Federal agency that is a covered transaction under that agency's regulation for debarment and suspension; or
( c ) Act as a principal of a person participating in one of those covered transactions.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance 

with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA14-44

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 17 June 2014

IN THE MATTER OF:

D.M.H. Caldwell County

No. 11 JA 91

Appeal by respondent from order entered 8 October 2013 by 

Judge Robert M. Brady in District Court, Caldwell County. Heard 

in the Court of Appeals 29 May 2014.

No brief filed on behalf of petitioner-appellee Caldwell 

County Department of Social Services.

Appellate Defender Staples Hughes by Assistant Appellate 

Defender Annick Lenoir-Peek for respondent-appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of guardian ad litem.

STROUD, Judge.

Respondent appeals from the trial court’s order terminating 

her parental rights to her child Dana.1 We affirm.

On 11 June 2013, after Dana had been adjudicated neglected 

and dependent and in DSS custody for some time with the 

permanent plan for her being adoption, DSS filed a motion to 

 

1 We use a pseudonym to protect the juvenile’s identity.
-2-

terminate respondent’s parental rights alleging neglect, failure 

to make reasonable progress, failure to pay for the cost of care 

of Dana, and abandonment. On 8 October 2013, the trial court 

terminated respondent’s parental rights based upon all four 

grounds. Respondent appealed.

Respondent’s appellate counsel has filed a no-merit brief 

in which she states she “has conducted a conscientious and 

thorough review of the record on appeal and all material in the 

underlying case files” and she concludes that this appeal 

presents “no issue of merit on which to base an argument for 

relief or that would alter the result.” See N.C.R. App. P. 

3.1(d). Included in respondent’s brief was a letter 

respondent’s counsel wrote to respondent in accordance with Rule 

3.1(d), advising respondent of counsel’s inability to find error

and of respondent’s right to file her own arguments directly 

with this Court. Respondent has not filed her own written 

arguments. After carefully reviewing the transcript and record, 

we also are unable to find any possible prejudicial error in the 

trial court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s 

order terminating respondent’s parental rights to Dana.

AFFIRMED.

Judges CALABRIA and DAVIS concur.
-3-

Report per Rule 30(e).
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 74 FR 40431, Aug. 11, 2009.

§ 248.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart governs the treatment of nonpublic personal information about consumers by the financial institutions listed in paragraph (b) of this section. This subpart: ( 1 ) Requires a financial institution to provide notice to customers about its privacy policies and practices;
( 2 ) Describes the conditions under which a financial institution may disclose nonpublic personal information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties; and
( 3 ) Provides a method for consumers to prevent a financial institution from disclosing that information to most nonaffiliated third parties by “opting out” of that disclosure, subject to the exceptions in §§ 248.13, 248.14, and 248.15.
( b ) *Scope.* Except with respect to § 248.30(b), this subpart applies only to nonpublic personal information about individuals who obtain financial products or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes from the institutions listed below. This subpart does not apply to information about companies or about individuals who obtain financial products or services primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes. This part applies to brokers, dealers, and investment companies, as well as to investment advisers that are registered with the Commission. It also applies to foreign (non-resident) brokers, dealers, investment companies and investment advisers that are registered with the Commission. These entities are referred to in this subpart as “you.” This subpart does not apply to foreign (non-resident) brokers, dealers, investment companies and investment advisers that are not registered with the Commission. Nothing in this subpart modifies, limits, or supersedes the standards governing individually identifiable health information promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the authority of sections 262 and 264 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-1320d-8).
[65 FR 40362, June 29, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 71329, Dec. 8, 2004]
### §13701. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13701 was editorially reclassified as section 12101 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1996 Amendments

Pub. L. 104–236, §1, Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3093, provided that: "This Act [enacting former sections 14072 and 14073 of this title, amending former section 14071 of this title, and enacting provisions formerly set out as notes under section 14071 of this title] may be cited as the 'Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act of 1996'."

Pub. L. 104–145, §1, May 17, 1996, 110 Stat. 1345, provided that: "This Act [amending former section 14071 of this title] may be cited as 'Megan's Law'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §41001, as added by Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §105(a), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2979, provided that subtitle J of title IV of Pub. L. 103–322, enacting part I (§14043 et seq.) of subchapter III of this chapter, could be cited as the "Violence Against Women Act Court Training and Improvements Act of 2005", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–4, title I, §104(b), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 76.
§ 247.772 Exemption from the definition of “broker” for banks engaging in securities lending transactions. ( a ) A bank is exempt from the definition of the term “broker” under section 3(a)(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)), to the extent that, as an agent, it engages in or effects securities lending transactions, and any securities lending services in connection with such transactions, with or on behalf of a person the bank reasonably believes to be: ( 1 ) A qualified investor as defined in section 3(a)(54)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(54)(A)); or
( 2 ) Any employee benefit plan that owns and invests on a discretionary basis, not less than $ 25,000,000 in investments.
( b ) *Securities lending transaction* means a transaction in which the owner of a security lends the security temporarily to another party pursuant to a written securities lending agreement under which the lender retains the economic interests of an owner of such securities, and has the right to terminate the transaction and to recall the loaned securities on terms agreed by the parties.
( c ) *Securities lending services* means: ( 1 ) Selecting and negotiating with a borrower and executing, or directing the execution of the loan with the borrower;
( 2 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of loaned securities;
( 3 ) Receiving, delivering, or directing the receipt or delivery of collateral;
( 4 ) Providing mark-to-market, corporate action, recordkeeping or other services incidental to the administration of the securities lending transaction;
( 5 ) Investing, or directing the investment of, cash collateral; or
( 6 ) Indemnifying the lender of securities with respect to various matters.
### §285a–8. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–482, title I, §103(b)(15), Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3687

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §417B, as added Pub. L. 103–43, title IV, §403(a), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 157; amended Pub. L. 105–340, title I, §103, Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3192; Pub. L. 106–505, title VI, §602(b), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2346, related to authorization of appropriations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable only with respect to amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2007 or subsequent fiscal years, see section 109 of Pub. L. 109–482, set out as an Effective Date of 2007 Amendment note under section 281 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.2000 Form Funding Portal.

This form shall be used for filings by funding portals under Regulation Crowdfunding (part 227 of this chapter).

[80 FR 71570, Nov. 16, 2015]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form Funding Portal, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
### §19236. Nondiscrimination

In carrying out requirements under this part, each Federal research agency shall ensure that policies and activities developed and implemented pursuant to this part are carried out in a manner that does not target, stigmatize, or discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin, consistent with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.).

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10637, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of this title and Tables.