alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1005.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The General Counsel, Inter-American Foundation, shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to 901 N. Stuart St., 10th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1005.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22890, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22891, June 23, 1986; 71 FR 63236, Oct. 30, 2006]
### §244a. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–353, title I, §102(a), July 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 362

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §312a, as added Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, §2, 68 Stat. 1025, related to birth and death statistics, annual collection, and compensation for transcription. See section 242k(h) of this title.
§ 121.0 United States Munitions List description and definitions. ( a ) For a description of the U.S. Munitions List and its designations, including the use of asterisks and the parenthetical “(MT)”, see § 120.10 of this subchapter.
( b ) As used in this part, *EAR* means Export Administration Regulations in 15 CFR parts 730 through 774.
[87 FR 16422, Mar. 23, 2022]
(June 30, 1977)

#### Carol W. Haussamen et al., as Trustees of L. Victor Weil, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants, v Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, Appellant-Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 15, 1976, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Sutton, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.
### §1973gg–10. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973gg–10 was editorially reclassified as section 20511 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-27 

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 Victor Dricks April 10, 1996

 NRC STAFF OFFICIALS TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 29

 TO DISCUSS ISSUES AT MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff officials will hold a

public meeting April 29 at the Wiscasset Middle School cafeteria,

Wiscasset, Maine, to discuss and answer questions about the Maine

Yankee Atomic Power Station. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m.

 During the first part of the meeting, which will last about

an hour, the NRC representatives will meet with officials from

the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company and the State of Maine for

a technical review of questions about the reliability of a

computer model used in plant safety calculations.

 After that initial session, both NRC and state officials

will receive questions and comments from the public. In order

that as many as possible can be heard, participants are asked to

limit comments to five minutes per person.
Presidential Documents

71689

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 236

Thursday, December 9, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7852 of December 6, 2004

National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

On a quiet Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, more than 2,400 Americans 

were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor. On that day, life changed in 

America, and the course of history was altered forever. 

Our citizens reacted to the attack with firm determination to defeat tyranny 

and secure our Nation. This enterprise required the commitment and effort 

of our entire country. At the height of the conflict, the United States had 

ships on every ocean and troops on five continents. In all, more than 

16 million Americans wore the uniform of our Nation. They came from 

all walks of life. They served honorably and fought fiercely. At home, 

millions more contributed to the war effort, laboring for victory in our 

factories, on farms, and across America. 

Today, we honor those who fought and died at Pearl Harbor, and we pay 

special tribute to the veterans of World War II. These heroes hold a cherished 

place in our history. Through their courage, sacrifice, and selfless dedication, 

they saved our country and preserved freedom. As we fight the war on 

terror, their patriotism continues to inspire a new generation of Americans 

who have been called to defend the blessings of liberty. Like those who 

have gone before them throughout our history, our troops fighting the war 

on terror are defending America from danger and liberating the oppressed. 

The Congress, by Public Law 103–308, as amended, has designated December 

7 of each year as ‘‘National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2004, as National Pearl Harbor 

Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion 

with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United 

States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result 

of their service at Pearl Harbor. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of 

December, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the IndependVerDate jul<14>2003 16:56 Dec 08, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\09DED0.SGM 09DED0

[FR Doc. 04–27241

Filed 12–8–04; 9:21 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
#### Benjamin Price *et al.*v. Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County *et al.*

(Filed Feb. 11. 1899.)

*Appeal*— Dismissed. Where all of the parties to an action pending-in the supreme court on appeal from an inferior court, before-the questions presented by the appeal are determined by the appellate court, compromise and settle all of the matters involved therein, and such fact is made to appear to the supreme court by affidavits and certified copies of official records, all of which are-undisputed by the appellant, the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from the District Court of Pawnee County; before*A*G. C. Bierer, District Judge.*

*122*Asp, 8hartel & Gottingham,*for plaintiffs in error.

*G. A. Houston*and *Eagleton & MorpMs,*for defendants in ■error.

Actions between Benjamin Price and others and J. F. Johnson and others and John N. Florer and others and the board of county commissioners of Pawnee county and -others. From the judgments, Price and others bring error.

Dismissed.

■Opinion of the court by

Bubwell, J.:

The above-entitled cases, although separate and distinct from each other, involve the same question of practice, and we will therefore dispose- of them all -together.

Since the plaintiffs in error filed their appeals in this ■court, the matters involved in each of the above-entitled cases have been fully settled and compromised, as shown by affidavits of the defendants in error filed in this court in support of their respective motions to dismiss the. appeals, which affidavits are undenied by the plaintiffs in ■error. This being true, the court will not consider any of the questions therein, and each of the above cases-should be dismissed, at the cost of the appellants. It is so ordered.

All of the Justices concurring.
§ 48.11 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight, or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time, the authority: ( 1 ) In § 48.7, to request additional information and documentation in connection with an application for registration;
( 2 ) In § 48.9(a)(1), to notify a registered foreign board of trade that it or the clearing organization has failed to satisfy any registration requirements or conditions for registration;
( 3 ) In § 48.9(c), to request that a registered foreign board of trade file with the Commission a written demonstration, containing such supporting data, information, and documents, in such form and manner and within such timeframe as the Commission may specify, that the foreign board of trade or clearing organization is in compliance with the registration requirements and/or conditions for registration; and
( 4 ) In § 48.10, to notify a foreign board of trade whether additional time is needed for staff to complete its review of policy or other issues pertinent to the additional contracts, or that the contract can be made available for trading by direct access.
( b ) The Director of the Division of Market Oversight may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter which has been delegated in this section.
( c ) Nothing in this section prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
[82 FR 28769, June 26, 2017]
Prepared Testimony of Moffat County Commissioner John Kinkaid

before EPA, Denver CO. 7/29/14

Good Morning. I am here before you today on behalf of my constituents in Moffat County, Colorado and the residents of all of northwest Colorado, who cannot be here this morning to testify.
If they could be here in person this morning, they would tell you that the environmental extremists' war on coal is really a war on prosperity; both for Moffat County and the entire nation. Western Colorado has never recovered from the great recession. Energy is the life blood of our economy. Just in Moffat County, our coal-fired power plant is responsible for $428 million per year in direct and indirect impact.
Maybe in Washington, D. C. that's not very much money, but here in the heartland of America, it is. Coal means that kids can go to school and get an education. Coal means that families can buy homes and put food on the table. Our coal mines and power plants are the largest taxpayers in both Moffat and Routt Counties. Coal and abundant, reliable, affordable electricity lift people out of poverty. That is true world-wide and it's true here in Colorado.
This isn't some abstract bureaucratic exercise to the people of northwest Colorado. To us, this is personal. The collar that I wear today is blue. It represents my neighbors, friends and the hard working people of northwest Colorado who are striving for a better life and a better future for their children and grandchildren. My collar represents my constituents who stay up all night, work weekends and holidays so that others can use their computers and cell phones anytime, day ornight. Moffat County deserves better than to be turned into another

Detroit, Michigan. No amount of job retraining can replace an $85,000 job.
Let me be clear. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Carbon and oxygen along with hydrogen are key components of life on this earth. And no matter how many times extremists say that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, that doesn't change the truth that it is not.
Nations like Germany and Australia have realized that carbon dioxide restrictions are ridiculous and counterproductive to a strong and vibrant economy. If EPA's plan to reduce carbon dioxide by 30% is implemented, you might as well tell the whole truth and explain to Americans that they are being asked to endure a 30% further reduction in their standard of living. Again; let me be clear. This is a formula for poverty and economic slavery. It is not in the DNA of the American people to live in serfdom.
The world needs a strong America and a strong America relies on affordable energy.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12g5-2 Definition of “total assets”.

For the purpose of section 12(g)(1) of the Act, the term *total assets* shall mean the total assets as shown on the issuer's balance sheet or the balance sheet of the issuer and its subsidiaries consolidated, whichever is larger, as required to be filed on the form prescribed for registration under this section and prepared in accordance with the pertinent provisions of Regulation S-X (17 CFR part 210). Where the security is a certificate of deposit, voting trust certificate, or certificate or other evidence of interest in a similar trust or agreement, the “total assets” of the issuer of the security held under the trust or agreement shall be deemed to be the “total assets” of the issuer of such certificate or evidence of interest.

(Sec. 3, 48 Stat. 882, as amended, sec. 3, 78 Stat. 566; 15 U.S.C. 78c, 78*l*)

[30 FR 484, Jan. 14, 1965]
### §2000bb–2. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) the term "government" includes a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, and official (or other person acting under color of law) of the United States, or of a covered entity;

(2) the term "covered entity" means the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each territory and possession of the United States;

(3) the term "demonstrates" means meets the burdens of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion; and

(4) the term "exercise of religion" means religious exercise, as defined in section 2000cc–5 of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–141, §5, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1489; Pub. L. 106–274, §7(a), Sept. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 103–141, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1488, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000bb of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2000—Par. (1). Pub. L. 106–274, §7(a)(1), substituted "or of a covered entity" for "a State, or a subdivision of a State".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 106–274, §7(a)(2), substituted "term 'covered entity' means" for "term 'State' includes".

Par. (4). Pub. L. 106–274, §7(a)(3), substituted "religious exercise, as defined in section 2000cc–5 of this title" for "the exercise of religion under the First Amendment to the Constitution".
#### § 38.1 Scope.

The provisions of this part 38 shall apply to every board of trade that has been designated or is applying to become designated as a contract market under Sections 5 and 6 of the Act. *Provided, however,* nothing in this provision affects the eligibility of designated contract markets to operate under the provisions of parts 37 or 49 of this chapter.

[71 FR 1964, Jan. 12, 2006, as amended at 77 FR 36697, June 19, 2012]
#### SUN-MING SHEU, Ming-Chien Hsu, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of NEW YORK, Hon. Jonathan Lippman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-3751-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 5, 2007.

Sun-Ming Sheu, Ming-Chien Hsu, New York, NY, pro se.

Justin R. Long, Assistant Solicitor General (Robert H. Easton, on the brief), for Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, Hon. CHESTER J. STRAUB, Hon. B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Plaintiffs Sun-Ming Sheu, Ming-Chien Hsu appeal from the August 3, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Affirmed, for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Leonard A. CLEMENT, a/k/a L, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-5212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 2007.

Decided: Aug. 2, 2007.

*891Reggie E. McKnight, McKnight Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas Tullidge Cullen, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leonard A. Clement pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than fifty grams of crack cocaine, more than five kilograms of cocaine, and more than 1000 kilograms of marijuana (Count 1), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). The district court imposed a mandatory life sentence under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1999 & Supp.2007), based upon at least two prior felony drug convictions. Clement’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging Clement’s sentence but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Clement filed a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm.

Relying on *United States v. Collins,*415 F.3d 304 (4th Cir.2005), counsel suggests that the district court erred by sentencing Clement without first determining the amount and type of drugs attributable to him individually. Counsel also asserts that the district court violated Clement’s Sixth Amendment rights at sentencing. Because Clement did not object at sentencing on these grounds, this court’s review is for plain error. *See United States v. Smith,*452 F.3d 323, 330-31 (4th Cir.) (discussing standard of review), ce*rt. denied,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 694, 166 L.Ed.2d 539 (2006). Here, the district court sentenced Clement to a mandatory life sentence under § 841(b)(1)(A) based upon at least two pri- or felony drug convictions. Moreover, contrary to Clement’s claim in his pro se *892supplemental brief that his prior convictions were misdemeanors, he admitted at the sentencing hearing that the prior convictions were felonies. Thus, we conclude there is no error in Clement’s sentence.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record for any meritorious issues and have found none. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform the client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.10b-1 Prohibition of use of manipulative or deceptive devices or contrivances with respect to certain securities exempted from registration. The term *manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance,* as used in section 10(b) (48 Stat. 891; 15 U.S.C. 78j(b)), is hereby defined to include any act or omission to act with respect to any security exempted from the operation of section 12(a) (48 Stat. 892; 15 U.S.C. 78 l (a)) pursuant to any section in this part which specifically provides that this section shall be applicable to such security if such act or omission to act would have been unlawful under section 9(a) (48 Stat. 889; 15 U.S.C. 78i(a)), or any rule or regulation heretofore or hereafter prescribed thereunder, if done or omitted to be done with respect to a security registered on a national securities exchange, and the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange to use or employ any such device or contrivance in connection with the purchase or sale of any such security is hereby prohibited. (Secs. 10, 12, 48 Stat. 891, 892; 15 U.S.C. 78j, 78 *l*)


Cross References:
For applicability of this section, see §§ 240.12a-4 and 240.12a-5. For regulations relating to employment of manipulative and deceptive devices, see §§ 240.10b-3 and 240.10b-5. [13 FR 8183, Dec. 22, 1948]
// Edgar(tm) Renderer was created by staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  Data and content created by government employees within the scope of their employment are not subject to domestic copyright protection. 17 U.S.C. 105.var Show={};Show.LastAR=null,Show.showAR=function(a,r,w){if(Show.LastAR)Show.hideAR();var e=a;while(e&&e.nodeName!='TABLE')e=e.nextSibling;if(!e||e.nodeName!='TABLE'){var ref=((window)?w.document:document).getElementById(r);if(ref){e=ref.cloneNode(!0);e.removeAttribute('id');a.parentNode.appendChild(e)}}if(e)e.style.display='block';Show.LastAR=e};Show.hideAR=function(){Show.LastAR.style.display='none'};Show.toggleNext=function(a){var e=a;while(e.nodeName!='DIV')e=e.nextSibling;if(!e.style){}else if(!e.style.display){}else{var d,p_;if(e.style.display=='none'){d='block';p='-'}else{d='none';p='+'}e.style.display=d;if(a.textContent){a.textContent=p+a.textContent.substring(1)}else{a.innerText=p+a.innerText.substring(1)}}}