alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

RAFIQ BIN BASHIR BIN :

JALLUL ALHAMI, et al., :

:

Petitioners, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-359 (GK) 

 :

GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

______________________________:

ORDER

A Status Conference was held in this case on January 14, 2009,

which was open to the public. Upon consideration of the

representations of the parties, and the entire record herein, it is

hereby

ORDERED, that Respondents’ opposition to Petitioners’ Motion

for Summary Judgment is due by 5:00 p.m. on February 6, 2009.

Petitioners’ reply is due by February 27, 2009; and it is further

ORDERED, that a Motions Hearing on the Motion for Summary

Judgement will take place on March 10, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The

Hearing will be held in Courtroom 26A, and will be closed to the

public so that classified matters can be discussed. At that

hearing, Respondents will have 30 minutes to present their case, 
-2-

Petitioners will have 30 minutes to respond, and then Respondents

will be allowed 15 minutes to reply.

 /s/ 

January 14, 2009 Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
#### §§ 9.27-9.29 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2019filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:August 5, 2019By/s/ James M. AndersonJames M. AndersonChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### In the Matter of Hugh Edward FLOWERS.

Misc. No. 136.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

Oct. 24, 1968.

*391Hugh Edward Flowers, pro se.

Bronson C. LaFollette, Atty. Gen., of State of Wisconsin, for respondent.

ORDER

GRUBB, Senior District Judge.

Hugh Edward Flowers, an inmate of the Wisconsin State Prison, has submitted a seventh appliction attacking the validity of his detention. In this purported complaint under the Civil Rights Statutes, brought in the name of Dorothy M. and Hugh Edward Flowers, it is contended that the enforced celibacy under the detention in the custodial institution constitutes impairment of the obligations under the marriage contract between the plaintiffs, who request compensatory damages in the amount of eight million dollars.

The application fails to state an actionable claim for various reasons. Foremost among these is that marriage is a social relation subject to the police power of the state and is not considered a contract within the constitutional protection against impairment. Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190, 211, 8 S.Ct. 723, 31 L.Ed. 654 (1888). Further, in this instance the applicant, by his own act, has impaired his ability to perform the obligations of the marriage, thus precluding himself from reliance on the constitutional provisions. See Lewis v. The American Savings *&*Loan Association and others, 98 Wis. 203, 226, 73 N.W. 793, 39 L.R.A. 559 (1898). Additionally, the State of Wisconsin is not a person subject to suit under the Civil Rights Statutes. Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1967).

Now, therefore, it is ordered that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be, and it is hereby denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4157 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4157

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2012

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Labor from reissuing or issuing a rule 
 substantially similar to a certain proposed rule under the Fair Labor 
             Standards Act of 1938 relating to child labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving 
America's Family Farms Act''.
    (b) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) family farms have a long history and tradition of 
        providing youth with valuable work experience;
            (2) Department of Labor regulations should not adversely 
        impact the longstanding tradition of youth working on farms 
        where they can gain valuable skills and lessons on hard work, 
        character, and leadership;
            (3) the Department of Labor's proposed regulations would 
        have curtailed opportunities for youth to gain experiential 
        learning and hands-on skills for enrollment in vocational 
        agricultural training;
            (4) the proposed regulations would have obstructed the 
        opportunity for youth to find rewarding employment and earn 
        money for a college education or other meaningful purposes;
            (5) the proposed regulations would have limited 
        opportunities for young farmers wishing to pursue a career in 
        agriculture at a time when the average age of farmers continues 
        to rise; and
            (6) working on a farm has become a way of life for 
        thousands of youth across the rural United States.

SEC. 2. RULE RELATING TO CHILD LABOR.

    The Secretary of Labor shall not reissue in substantially the same 
form, or issue a new rule that is substantially the same as, the 
proposed rule entitled ``Child Labor Regulations, Orders and Statements 
of Interpretation; Child Labor Violations--Civil Money Penalties'' 
(published at 76 Fed. Reg. 54836 (September 2, 2011)).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report**

 

Harold G. Giomi and Jack B.Buchold hereby certify as follows:

 

1.               They are theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of The BankHoldings.

 

2.               The Form 10-QSBof The Bank Holdings for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of The Bank Holdings.

 

 

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2005 |   | /s/ Hal Giomi                           |   |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|               |   | THE BANK HOLDINGS                       |   |
|               |   | Harold G. Giomi                         |   |   |   |   |   |
|               |   | Chairman & Chief  Executive Officer |
|               |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
|               |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
|               |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: May 13, 2005 |   | /s/ Jack B. Buchold                     |   |   |   |   |   |
|               |   | THE BANK HOLDINGS                       |   |
|               |   | Jack B. Buchold                         |   |   |   |   |   |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer                 |   |   |   |   |
|                    |        |                                         |        |        |  |  |  |  |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.7c2-1 [Reserved]
§ 127.4 Authority of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers. ( a ) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers may take appropriate action to ensure observance of this subchapter as to the export or the attempted export or the temporary import of any defense article or technical data, including the inspection of loading or unloading of any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft. This applies whether the export is authorized by license or by written approval issued under this subchapter or by exemption.
( b ) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers have the authority to investigate, detain or seize any export or attempted export of defense articles or technical data contrary to this subchapter.
( c ) Upon the presentation to a U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officer of a license or written approval, or claim of an exemption, authorizing the export of any defense article, the customs officer may require the production of other relevant documents and information relating to the final export. This includes an invoice, order, packing list, shipping document, correspondence, instructions, and the documents otherwise required by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
( d ) If an exemption under this subchapter is used or claimed to export, transfer, reexport or retransfer, furnish, or obtain a defense article, technical data, or defense service, law enforcement officers may rely upon the authorities noted, additional authority identified in the language of the exemption, and any other lawful means or authorities to investigate such a matter.
[70 FR 50965, Aug. 29, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 16642, Mar. 21, 2012]
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Company, as Trustee under the Will of Gertrude W. Belden, Deceased, Respondent. John W. Blagbrough et al., Infants, by Francis P. Maloney, Their Special Guardian, Appellants.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 997; 276 App. Div. 823.]
### §16926. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16926 was editorially reclassified as section 20928 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Worksheet Title: HCl Emission Test Results Template Using Method 321

Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?Company Name:Facility Name: Leeds Cement PlantAddress: 8401 Second AveCity: LeedsState: AlabamaKiln ID:Kiln Type: The kiln is PHIn-line Raw Mill:Control Device Configuration: 

Parameter

Sample #1

Sample #2

Sample #3

Test AverageUnits

Units Other 

DescriptionTest Method Used Test Locatio

Select appropriate unit from list. If other is selected please describe units in column H at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used.

Indicate whether the occurred upstream odownstream of a codevice(s); list the codevice(s)

Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/17/2010 3/17/2010 3/17/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis 4.89 2.68 2.48 ppmvd 

Oxygen Concentration - dry basis 13.46 13.36 13.36 %CO2 Concentration - dry basis 13 13 13 %HCl Concentration - corrected to 7% oxygen 9.14 4.94 4.57 6.22 ppmvd @ 7% O2 EPA Method 321 Downstream; Bagh

Exhaust Stream %Moisture 10.89 10.04 10.47 %

Exhaust Flowrate 168,464 160,774 165,693 DSCFM

Exhaust Temperature 204.3 198.4 203.6 Degrees F

Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy) 3/18/2010 3/18/2010 3/18/2010

HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis 4.36 2.41 2.22 ppmvd 

Oxygen Concentration - dry basis 9.6 10.45 10.69 %CO2 Concentration - dry basis 21 16 17 %HCl Concentration 20.09 24.16 27.81 24.02 ppmvd @ 7% O2 EPA Method 321 Downstream; Bagh

Exhaust Stream %Moisture 13.40 13.91 13.93 %

Exhaust Flowrate 101,345 116,196 118,188 DSCFM

Exhaust Temperature 292.6 300.9 302.3 Degrees F

Notes:

Facilities that use Method 321 to test for HClLehigh Cement CompanyBaghouseEnter HCl concentration value in dry parts per million volume (ppmvd). If the test results are below detection limit, please note the detection limit in brackets (e.g., [< 0.010]). 

Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response

YesRotary Kiln

Enclosure 5c‐‐ERT Spreadsheet
§ 171.34 Standards of review. ( a ) *Disciplinary actions.* In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a disciplinary action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
( 2 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
( 3 ) The weight of the evidence does not support the findings of the National Futures Association concerning the relevant acts or practices engaged in or omitted;
( 4 ) The determination that the acts or practices engaged in or omitted violated rules of the National Futures Association does not rest on a reasonable interpretation of the rules at issue;
( 5 ) The National Futures Association's application of its rules is not consistent with the purposes of the Act;
( 6 ) The National Futures Association's choice of sanction is excessive or oppressive in light of the violations found having due regard for the public interest.
( b ) *Membership denial actions.* In reviewing a final decision of the National Futures Association in a membership denial action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association, unless the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
( 2 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
( 3 ) The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;
( 4 ) The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
( c ) *Registration actions.* In reviewing a decision of the National Futures Association in a registration action, the Commission shall affirm the order of the National Futures Association unless the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with fundamental fairness;
( 2 ) The proceedings were not conducted in a manner consistent with the rules of the National Futures Association;
( 3 ) The weight of the evidence does not support the findings made or adopted in the final decision;
( 4 ) The conclusion of the National Futures Association is not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
§ 300.102 Accounts held by executors, administrators, guardians, etc. ( a ) Accounts held with a member in the name of a decedent or in the name of his estate or in the name of the executor or administrator of the estate of the decedent shall be combined so as to constitute a single account of a separate customer.
( b ) An account held with a member by a guardian, custodian, or conservator for the benefit of a ward or for the benefit of a minor under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act or in a similar capacity shall be deemed to be held by such guardian, custodian, or conservator in a different capacity from any account or accounts maintained by such person in his individual capacity.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4073 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4073

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to accept the quitclaim, 
  disclaimer, and relinquishment of a railroad right of way within and 
adjacent to Pike National Forest in El Paso County, Colorado, originally 
granted to the Mt. Manitou Park and Incline Railway Company pursuant to 
                        the Act of March 3, 1875.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF RELINQUISHMENT OF RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY 
MANITOU AND PIKES PEAK RAILWAY COMPANY, COLORADO, OVER NATIONAL FOREST 
SYSTEM LAND.
    (a) Authority To Accept.--Notwithstanding the Act of March 8, 1922 
(43 U.S.C. 912), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept the quitclaim, 
disclaimer, and relinquishment by the Manitou and Pikes Peak Railway 
Company, successor in interest to the Mt. Manitou Park and Incline 
Railway Company, of a right of way, more fully described in subsection 
(b), within and adjacent to Pike National Forest that was originally 
granted by the Secretary to the Mt. Manitou Park and Incline Railway 
Company pursuant to the authority provided by the Act of March 3, 1875 
(Chapter 152; 18 Stat. 482) for the construction of a railroad and 
station in El Paso County, Colorado.
    (b) Right of Way Described.--The railroad right of way referred to 
in subsection (a) is located in the S\1/2\ of section 6, Township 14 
South, Range 67 West, and N\1/2\SE \1/4\ of section 1, Township 14 
South, Range 68 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, and is 
depicted in a tracing filed in the United States Land Office at Pueblo, 
Colorado, file 019416, on December 24, 1914.
    (c) Limited Applicability.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to affect the right, title, and interest of the Manitou and 
Pikes Peak Railway Company in land held in fee title by the Manitou and 
Pikes Peak Railway Company.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 146.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 146.500 through 146.550.
#### § 39.1 Scope.

The provisions of this subpart A apply to any derivatives clearing organization, as defined under section 1a(15) of the Act and § 1.3 of this chapter, that is registered or is required to register with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization pursuant to section 5b(a) of the Act, or that is applying for an exemption from registration pursuant to section 5b(h) of the Act.

[86 FR 965, Jan. 7, 2021]
#### § 1421.7 Hearing Officer.

*Hearing Officer* means the individual designated to conduct a hearing involving a question concerning the appropriateness of a unit or such other matters as may be assigned.
#### In the Matter of Hollis Townsend, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 220]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplin*626ary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Initially, we note that the testimony from the correction officers involved in the procurement and testing of petitioner’s urine specimen together with the documentation thereon adequately established a sufficient chain of custody and adequacy of testing procedures used *(see, Matter of Mitchell v Goord,*272 AD2d 686; *Matter of Rivera v Goord,*258 AD2d 858). Furthermore, the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing and positive urinalysis test results constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see, Matter of McMahon v Dobbins,*273 AD2d 578). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.