alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB-A f or
      the
      six month period ending June
      30,
      2007, a s
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2007 (the “Report”),
      I, J.
      Holt
      Smith, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/ J. Holt SmithJ.
              Holt SmithInterim
                Chief Executive Officer
              August
                27, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY L. COTTLE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 116 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 115 ) ll-E-7 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 115 oj264P. 2

02-26.9 7 If) ; S

O ©1010041023 4 PE S RT P N C I2l002'00 2 

# ^
. Q?r-u, l*-r<-f"n Qwmi-otti

Contac tRepor t Plasti c Composite s NESHA P 

## A 945 2 ^

From : Date : Contact : Company : TeUphon e Number : Gre g LaFlam , Pacific Environmenta l Seivices , Inc

. (PES ) Jun e 24 , 199 6 Dr . Fran k Cassi s ( X^ou^nr^t^s-o s 0^^ ^ V

Contac tSummary : P(ft r (2 c i>(Lp** i " r ' Discussio n o f

monome r content s o f corrosion-resisianfresins . Dr . Cassi s wa s involve d in helpin g t o establis h the monomer conten tlimits i n place in California . Th e Californi a limit s ar c 

### a s follows :

1 . 2 . 3 . Resi n Typ e iso- , tere - polyester s viny l esters , bisphcnols , cldoiendi c polyester s Monome r Limi t fWt . Percent ) 

### 4 8 4 5
4 2 fire retardan

t
Thes e limits ar

e intended t

o reflec tth e bes tlovu.monome

r technolog y i n placa a

tth« presenttime . "^mMQtVny l ester s ar e availabl e wit

h monorneLc-pntenga

s lo w a s 3 5 percent . However , in certai n j_diBiifijfifsi(>iation< ; thes e lower Sfffir i viny l ester s ar e no t appropriate . Also , th e 3 5 percen tviny l este

r i s costlie r tha

n th e 4 5 percen

tversio n (polyme r i s mor e expensiv e o n a unitbasi s tha n monomer) . l) r ossi s sai d tha

tfabricator

s ar e &RH_mmmt

t o us e lowe r monomer conten tresins , an d th e technolog y i s continuall y improving . REPOR T I S ACCURAT

i 

# £144^*-
§ 270.30a-2 Certification of Form N-CSR. ( a ) Each report filed on Form N-CSR (§§ 249.331 and 274.128 of this chapter) by a registered management investment company must include certifications in the form specified in Item 19(a)(3) of Form N-CSR, and such certifications must be filed as an exhibit to such report. Each principal executive and principal financial officer of the investment company, or persons performing similar functions, at the time of filing of the report must sign a certification.
( b ) Each report on Form N-CSR filed by a registered management investment company under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that contains financial statements must be accompanied by the certifications required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) and such certifications must be furnished as an exhibit to such report as specified in Item 19(b) of Form N-CSR. Each principal executive and principal financial officer of the investment company (or equivalent thereof) must sign a certification. This requirement may be satisfied by a single certification signed by an investment company's principal executive and principal financial officers.
[87 FR 73141, Nov. 27, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANCIS SOUTH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 633 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates: 1940: population and housing: families: income and rent; regions,cities of 1,000,000 or more, and metropolitan districts of 1,000,000 or more**
 
Parts: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/16
Item Number:0198 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104396
 
August 19, 2019
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 96-60372 

___________________________

DESMOND EARL PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

STEVE PUCKETT, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

Greenville Division

(4:96-CV-59-S-B)

____________________________________________________

December 6, 1996

Before WISDOM, DAVIS, and DUHE’, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:1

Desmond Phillips appeals the district court’s sua sponte

dismissal under § 1915(d) of his § 1983 complaint filed pro se and

in forma pauperis alleging that following a prison disciplinary

hearing he was placed on close confinement where he has remained

for approximately three years without annual classification

reviews. We VACATE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent
with this opinion.
I.

We review the district court’s Section 1915(d) dismissal of

Phillips' complaint for abuse of discretion. Graves v. Hampton, 1

F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). Section 1915(d) “authorizes federal

courts to dismiss a claim filed in forma pauperis ‘if satisfied

that the action is frivolous or malicious.’” Neitzke v. Williams,

490 U.S. 319, 109 S.Ct. 1827 (1989)(citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915).

Relying on Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. ___ , 132 L.Ed.2d 418,

115 S.Ct. 2293 (1995), the district court dismissed Phillips’

complaint as frivolous. In Sandin, the Supreme Court held that

thirty days disciplinary confinement did “not present the type of

atypical, significant deprivation in which a state might

conceivably create a liberty interest." Sandin, 115 S.Ct. at 2300.

In contrast, Phillips’ allegation that he has been subject to

disciplinary confinement for three years without review arguably

presents an “atypical significant deprivation” that implicates a

liberty interest. Because the argument is not frivolous, we vacate

the district court’s dismissal of the suit and remand for

reconsideration following further factual development.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
No: I-15-002 January 22, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC to Conduct Webinar on Feb. 5th on

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Topics

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will present a webinar for interested members of the 

public on Thursday, Feb. 5, regarding the decommissioning of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power 

plant. The purpose of the webinar is to provide key facts about the decommissioning process and how 

the NRC regulates such activities through on-site inspections and other reviews. 

“There has been considerable interest in Vermont and neighboring states about how the 

decommissioning process will work. Our hope is that this webinar will serve as a primer so that those 

interested in this topic can learn more,” said Dan Dorman, Administrator of the NRC’s Region I Office, 

which is located in King of Prussia, Pa., and oversees inspections at nuclear power plants in the 

northeastern United States.

The webinar will begin at 3 p.m. Participants will be able to view slides prepared by NRC staff 

and ask questions in writing via a web page set up to host the session. Online registration is required to 

take part.

The NRC will also hold a public meeting in Brattleboro, Vt., on Feb. 19 to discuss and accept 

public comments on the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report for Vermont Yankee 

submitted by Entergy. A copy of the report can be found on the NRC website .

Vermont Yankee is located in Vernon, Vt. It is owned and operated by Entergy. The company 

announced on Aug. 27, 2013, that it planned to permanently shut down the single-unit plant as of the 

end of 2014. The boiling-water reactor permanently ceased operations on Dec. 29, 2014.
#### Robert Henry, Respondent, v Richard W. Russillo, Appellant.

In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award relating to no-fault benefits, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 8, 1976, which confirmed the arbitrator’s award and denied appellant’s cross motion to vacate the award. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The arbitrator found that the claimant-respondent crossed a road and was struck by a truck while he was "streaking”, but that he "was not aware that he was fleeing apprehension” (see Insurance Law, § 672, subd. 2, par [c], cl [i]). That finding is supported by the evidence in the record. The running was not proof, per se, of a flight from apprehension, since an essential aspect of "streaking” is running. Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### C. E. Vandervoort v Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County.

(Filed Feb. 11, 1899.)

*Error from the Probate Court of Pawnee County; before-James P. Neal, Probate Judge.*

*John F. Stone, A. J. Biddison*and *Geo. S. Green,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eagleton & Morpins,*for defendant in error.

. Actions by Charles E. Vandervoort against the board; of commissioners of Pawnee county, (three cases.) Judgments for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

Dismissed.

Per Curiam:

The record in these cases shows that more than one year has intervened between the rendition of the judgment and the overruling of the motion for a new trial in the probate court, and the filing of the petition in error in the supreme court. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction to review such judgments. The record in cases Nos. 767, 768, and 769, being in the same condition as that of *Hoffman v. Board,*this volume, p. 225, the petition in error is hereby dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Nicole H., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York, Respondent; Rose D., Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 222]

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated December 2, 1998, which, after a hearing, found that the subject child had been neglected, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court, dated April 16, 1999, which released the child to her under the supervision of the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as released the child to the mother under the supervision of the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as released the child to the mother under the supervision of the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York must be dismissed as academic because *381that portion of the order has expired by its own terms. Therefore, any corrective measures which this Court might have taken with respect to the placement of the child would have no practical effect (see, *Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. [Kalisha A.] v Diognes T.,*208 AD2d 844). However, the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as determined that the child was neglected is not academic (see, *Matter of Maxwell B.,*269 AD2d 444) since the underlying finding of neglect constitutes a permanent and significant stigma which might indirectly affect the appellant’s status in any future proceedings (see, *Matter of Arthur C.,*260 AD2d 478; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Vincent D.] v Vincent D. II,*232 AD2d 410; *Matter of H. Children,*156 AD2d 520).

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the finding that she neglected the child by keeping a loaded weapon under the mattress where she and the child slept was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3787 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a jobs score 

for each spending bill considered in Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2012 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. 

MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require 

a jobs score for each spending bill considered in Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs Score Act of 

5 2012’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3787 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET 

2 ACT OF 1974. 

3 Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

4 (2 U.S.C. 653) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

6 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

7 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(4) an estimate of the number of jobs which 

11 would be created, sustained, or lost in carrying out 

12 such bill or resolution in the fiscal year in which it 

13 is to become effective and in each of the 4 fiscal 

14 years following such fiscal year, together with the 

15 basis for each such estimate, and to the extent prac16 ticable, the analysis shall include regional and State17 level estimates of jobs that would be created, sus18 tained, or lost.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[115th Congress Public Law 351]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5066]]

Public Law 115-351
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 200 West North Street in Normal, Illinois, as the ``Sgt. Josh Rodgers 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 4326]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SGT. JOSH RODGERS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 200 West North Street in Normal, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sgt. Josh Rodgers Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. Josh 
Rodgers Post Office''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4326:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Nov. 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Pine Street Company, Appellant, v. Lawson Purdy, President, and Others, as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments, etc., of the City of New York, Respondents.

—Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
§ 33.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Purchase price* means the total amount paid or to be paid, directly or indirectly, by a person to acquire a commodity option.
( b ) *Promotional material* includes: ( 1 ) Any text of a standardized oral presentation, or any communication for publication in any newspaper, magazine or similar medium, or for broadcast over television, radio, or other electronic medium, which is disseminated or directed to an option customer or prospective option customer concerning a commodity option transaction;
( 2 ) any standardized form of report, letter, circular, memorandum, or publication which is disseminated or directed to an option customer or prospective option customer; and
( 3 ) any other written material disseminated or directed to an option customer or prospective option customer for the purpose of soliciting an option transaction, including any disclosure statement required by § 33.7.
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: March 31,2005

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Assurance Company
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago,IL 60685


13F File Number: 28-386

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
May 12,2005
Chicago, Illinois, 60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which Continental Assurance Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of Continental Assurance Company.
<Page>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ASB Holding Company ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the  "Report") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, we Joseph Kliminski,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Eric Heyer, Senior Vice President and
Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.   The information  contained in such Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods  presented in the financial  statements
     included in such report.




Dated: September 26, 2003      /s/Joseph Kliminski
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Joseph Kliminski
                               President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: September 26, 2003      /s/Eric B. Heyer
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer