alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ken Martin Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  August 19th, 2008
§ 1471.10 Final action by the Panel. ( a ) If the parties do not arrive at a settlement as a result of or during action taken under §§ 1471.5(a)(2), 1471.6, 1471.7, 1471.8, and 1471.9, the Panel may take whatever action is necessary and not inconsistent with 22 U.S.C. 4110 to resolve the impasse, including but not limited to methods and procedures which the Panel considers appropriate, such as directing the parties to accept a factfinder's recommendations, ordering binding arbitration conducted according to whatever procedure the Panel deems suitable, and rendering a binding decision.
( b ) In preparation for taking such final action, the Panel may hold hearings, administer oaths, take the testimony or deposition of any person under oath, and issue subpoenas as provided in 22 U.S.C. 4110(c)(2), or it may appoint or designate one or more individuals pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 4110(c)(1) to exercise such authority on its behalf.
( c ) When the exercise of authority under this section requires the holding of a hearing, the procedure contained in § 1471.7 shall apply.
( d ) Notice of any final action of the Panel shall be promptly served upon the parties, and the action shall be binding on such parties during the term of the agreement, unless they agree otherwise.
( e ) All papers submitted to the Executive Director under this section shall be filed in duplicate, along with a statement of service showing that a copy has been served on the other party to the dispute.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4197 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4197

     To extend the authority to provide loan guarantees to Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2012

Ms. Ros-Lehtinen (for herself and Mr. Berman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the authority to provide loan guarantees to Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE LOAN GUARANTEES TO ISRAEL.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 5 of title I of the Emergency Wartime 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108-11), as amended, 
is further amended in the item relating to ``Loan Guarantees to 
Israel''--
            (1) in the matter preceding the first proviso, by striking 
        ``September 30, 2011'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''; 
        and
            (2) in the second proviso, by striking ``September 30, 
        2011'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section take 
effect as of September 30, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  annual  report on Form 10-Q of  Capital  Beverage
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  (the "
Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to the  best of my
knowledge and belief:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 23, 2005                   By:  /s/Carmine Stella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Carmine N. Stella
                                   Title:  Chief Executive Officer


     In  connection  with the  annual  report on Form 10-Q of  Capital  Beverage
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  (the "
Report"),  I, Carol  Russell,  hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the
Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 23, 2005                   By:  /s/ Carol Russell
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Carol Russell
                                   Title:  Treasurer
exv10w18w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.18.2




Amendment to Offer Letter dated January 27, 2004

between Raindance Communication, Inc. and Donald F. Detampel, Jr.




January 23, 2006




Don Detampel

369 Steele Street

Denver, CO 80206




Re:      Amendment to Offer Letter




Dear Don:



This letter amends the offer letter previously provided to you by Raindance Communications, Inc.
(the “Company”), dated January 27, 2004, as amended (the “Offer Letter”). Except as specifically
set forth below, all provisions of the Offer Letter will remain in full force and effect and all
capitalized terms used herein not defined in this letter will have the meanings in the Offer
Letter.



The Offer Letter is hereby amended to add the following as new paragraph 12(f), to read as follows:




“(f) Deferred Compensation. In the event that the Company determines that any cash
severance payment benefit to be provided pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise
fails to satisfy the distribution requirement of Section 409A(a)(2)(A) of the Code
as a result of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then the payment of such
benefits shall be accelerated from the original payment schedule to the minimum
extent necessary to avoid the application of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code. (The
payment schedule as revised after the application of the preceding sentence shall be
referred to as the “Revised Payment Schedule.”) However, in the event the
accelerated payment of such benefits would not avoid the application of Section
409A(a)(1) of the Code, the payment of such benefits shall not be made pursuant to
the original payment schedule or the Revised Payment Schedule and instead the
payment of such benefits shall be delayed to the minimum extent necessary so that
such benefits are not subject to the provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code.



Please sign below if you agree and accept the foregoing terms.



Sincerely,



Raindance Communications, Inc.



	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Stephanie Anagnostou
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	General Counsel	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





I have read and agree to the terms and conditions contained herein:




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Don Detampel

	 	1/23/06
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Don Detampel

	 	Date
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3945 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 171. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 171. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 171. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acid Blue 171, (Cobaltate(2- 

), [6-(amino-kN)-5-[2-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4- 

nitrophenyl]diazenyl-kN1]- 

nitrophenyl]diazenyl-kN1]-2- 

naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, 

sodium (1:2)) (CAS No. 

75314–27–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.12.45) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3945 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 641



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISIONS I & IV No. CR-15-72 J.F. APPELLANT V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered November 12, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT [NO. JV-2009-114] HONORABLE LEE FERGUS, JUDGE REVERSED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge This appeal is one of four cases to come before this court involving four juveniles who were tried together as codefendants on charges of theft by receiving, a Class C felony, and minor in possession. 1 Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred by failing to grant his motion to dismiss 2 because the only evidence of his guilt came from the testimony of a codefendant. We reverse appellant’s adjudication based on the analysis in a companion opinion decided October 28, 2015, D.F. v. State , 2015 Ark. App. ___.; therefore, we adopt and incorporate herein by reference the reasoning set forth in the companion case. Reversed.

1 I.G. v. State , CR-15-74, D.F. v. State , CR-15-78 and A.I.M. v. State , CR-15-79.

2 Although appellant made a motion for a directed verdict during the adjudication and argues on appeal error in denial of the motion for a directed verdict, a motion for dismissal is generally made during a nonjury trial. Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1 (2014).Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 641

H ARRISON , K INARD , G LOVER , AND B ROWN , JJ., agree. G LADWIN , C.J., dissents. R OBERT J. G LADWIN , Chief Judge, dissenting . I dissent based on the same rationale expressed in D.F. v. State , 2015 Ark. App. ____. Terry Goodwin Jones , for appellant. Leslie Rutledge , Att’y Gen., by: Kristen C. Green , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
#### § 202.150 Commission approval of appointment or removal from office of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board hearing officers.

The Commission shall approve both the appointment and removal from office of any hearing officer employed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. No action by the Board proposing to appoint or remove from office a hearing officer shall be final absent Commission approval.

[84 FR 12908, Apr. 3, 2019]
§ 1006.625 What is the scope of a suspension or debarment? If you are suspended or debarred, the suspension or debarment is effective as follows: ( a ) Your suspension or debarment constitutes suspension or debarment of all of your divisions and other organizational elements from all covered transactions, unless the suspension or debarment decision is limited— ( 1 ) By its terms to one or more specifically identified individuals, divisions, or other organizational elements; or
( 2 ) To specific types of transactions.
( b ) Any affiliate of a participant may be included in a suspension or debarment action if the suspending or debarring official— ( 1 ) Officially names the affiliate in the notice; and
( 2 ) Gives the affiliate an opportunity to contest the action.
§ 130.6 Political contribution. *Political contribution* means any loan, gift, donation or other payment of $1,000 or more made, or offered or agreed to be made, directly or indirectly, whether in cash or in kind, which is: ( a ) To or for the benefit of, or at the direction of, any foreign candidate, committee, political party, political faction, or government or governmental subdivision, or any individual elected, appointed or otherwise designated as an employee or officer thereof; and
( b ) For the solicitation or promotion or otherwise to secure the conclusion of a sale of defense articles or defense services to or for the use of the armed forces of a foreign country or international organization. Taxes, customs duties, license fees, and other charges required to be paid by applicable law or regulation are not regarded as political contributions.
§ 1508.415 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes the participant or a principal after I enter into a covered transaction? ( a ) You as an agency official may continue covered transactions with an excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, if the transactions were in existence when the person was excluded. You are not required to continue the transactions, however, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, or under which an excluded person is a principal, unless you obtain an exception under § 1508.120.
Subpart 5328.1 — BONDS                         **Parent topic:** Part 5328 - Bonds and Insurance5328.105  Other Types of Bonds       See MP5301.601(a)(i).5328.106-2 Substitution of Surety Bonds       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5328.106-6 Furnishing Information       (c) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

Nos. 95-2799, 95-3653.

Carol WYKE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Shawn David Wyke, a

minor deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Max Linton, individually and as Principal of McLaughlin

Junior High School of Polk County, and James Butler, individually and as Vice-Principal of

McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County, Defendants-Appellants.

Carol WYKE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Shawn David Wyke, a

minor deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Max Linton, individually and as Principal of McLaughlin

Junior High School of Polk County, and James Butler, individually and as Vice-Principal of

McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County, Defendants-Appellees.

March 26, 1998

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 91-1457-CivT-24C); Elizabeth A. Jenkins and William T. Moore, Jr., Judges.

Before ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and FAY and KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In our earlier opinion in this matter, Wyke v. Polk County Sch. Bd., 129 F.3d 560 (11th

Cir.1997), we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

Does Florida's comparative fault statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 768.81 (West 1997 Supp.), require

the allocation of "fault" between both negligent and intentional tortfeasors?

Following our certification the Supreme Court of Florida decided the cases of Merrill

Crossings Assoc. v. McDonald, 705 So.2d 560, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S739 (Dec. 4, 1997), and Stellas

v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, 702 So.2d 232 (Fla.1997). It appearing that the opinions rendered in these
cases provided a clear answer to the question certified, we withdraw the certification with the

consent of the Supreme Court of Florida.

The trial court in this matter refused to include the name of Shawn David Wyke on the

verdict form. That court ruled that the jury could not apportion liability to Shawn since he had not

committed a negligent act but rather an intentional one (suicide). This ruling was in accord with

what is now the clear law of Florida under Florida Statute § 768.81.

Having resolved all the issues presented in these matters, the judgment of the district court

is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1305.12 No private right of action.

This part is intended only to provide guidance for the internal operations of MCC, and is not intended to, and does not, and may not be relied upon, to create a right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4222 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the conveyance of certain land inholdings owned by the 
 United States to the Tucson Unified School District and to the Pascua 
            Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pascua Yaqui Tribe Trust Land Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    For the purposes of this Act, the following definitions apply:
            (1) District.--The term ``District'' means the Tucson 
        Unified School District, a school district recognized as such 
        under the laws of the State of Arizona.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map titled ``Pascua 
        Yaqui Tribe Trust Land Act'' and dated April 23, 2012.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (4) Tribe.--The term ``Tribe'' means the Pascua Yaqui Tribe 
        of Arizona, a federally recognized Indian tribe.

SEC. 3. LANDS TO BE HELD IN TRUST.

    (a) Parcel A.--Subject to valid existing rights, all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to the Federal lands of 
approximately 10 acres shown on the map as Parcel A are declared held 
in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe.
    (b) Parcel B.--Immediately upon the Secretary's receipt from the 
District of the abandonment of its possessory interest of the lands of 
approximately 10 acres shown on the map as Parcel B, subject to valid 
existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the Federal lands shown on the map as Parcel B are declared held 
in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe.

SEC. 4. GAMING PROHIBITION.

    The Tribe may not conduct gaming activities on the lands held in 
trust under this Act, as a matter of claimed inherent authority or 
under the authority of any Federal law, including the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) or under any regulations 
thereunder promulgated by the Secretary or the National Indian Gaming 
Commission.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the conveyance of certain land inholdings owned by the 
 United States to the Tucson Unified School District and to the Pascua 
            Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, and for other purposes.
```
### §1962d–6. Feasibility studies; acceleration; advancement of costs by non-Federal sources

The Secretary may accelerate feasibility studies authorized by law when and to the extent that the costs of such studies shall have been advanced by non-Federal sources.

(Pub. L. 89–561, §5, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 714.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Water Resources Planning Act which comprises this chapter.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 2 0 0 9 0 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

D A V I D T H O M A S
, J R

. ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

C

. Z A K H O R I A
, H o u s t o n P o l i c e O f f i c e r ; C

. R O Z E K
, H o u s t o n P o l i c e O f f i c e r s ; M

. C H A P N I C K
, H o u s t o n P o l i c e O f f i c e r ,

D e f

e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l e e s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 7

- C V

- 3 2 5 1

B e f o r e W I E N E R
, P R A D O
, a n d O W E N
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t D a v i d T h o m a s , J r

. f i l e d t h i s a c t i o n a g a i n s t H o u s t o n

p o l i c e o f

f i c e r s a n d o t h e r s a l l e g i n g u s e o f e x c e s s i v e f o r c e i n a r r e s t i n g h i m i n t h e

r e s t r o o m o f

a W h a t a b u r g e r r e s t a u r a n t

. T h e c a s e w a s t r i e d b e f o r e a j u r y w h i c h

r e t u r n e d a v e r d i c t i n f a v o r o f D e f e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l a n t s , a n d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

e n t e r e d a t a k e

- n o t h i n g j u d g m e n t d i s m i s s i n g T h o m a s ’ s a c t i o n

. P r o c e e d i n g p r o U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D March 24 , 20 11

Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5
, the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion s hould not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20090 Document: 00511422554 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2011N o

. 1 0

- 2 0 0 9 0

s e a n d i n f

o r m a p a u p e r i s o n a p p e a l
, T h o m a s c o n t e n d s o n l y t h a t t h e j u r y v e r d i c t

w a s a g a i n s t t h e g r e a t w e i g h t o f t h e e v i d e n c e a n d t h a t i t s h o u l d b e r e v e r s e d a n d

h i s c a s e r e m a n d e d f

o r a n e w t r i a l

. O u r r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d o n a p p e a l
, i n c l u d i n g t h e b r i e f s o f t h e p a r t i e s a n d

t h e a p p l i c a b l e l a w , c o n v i n c e s u s t h a t t h e r e i s n o b a s i s f o r o u r r e v e r s i n g t h e

v e r d i c t o f t h e j u r y o r t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t e n t e r e d p u r s u a n t t h e r e t o

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h a t j u d g m e n t i s , i n a l l r e s p e c t s , A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 10-20090 Document: 00511422554 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2011
3413.303-5 Purchases under BPAs.       (b) Individual purchases under blanket purchase agreements for commercial items may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold but shall not exceed the threshold for the test program for certain commercial items in FAR 13.500(a).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3413.3—Simplified Acquisition Methods