## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 23

- 00190

- CR

JEFFERY DON DAVIDSON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No. CR02932

B efore Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION On August 12, 2019, Jeffery Don Davidson ple d guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in an amount less than one gram, 1 and the trial court placed
Davidson o n deferred adjudication community supervision for three years and assessed court
costs of $715.00, r estitution of $1 80.00 payable to the Texas Department of Public Safety , and a $1,000.00 fine. David son di d not appea l th at order

. On Ma y 9, 2022, the trial court adjudicated Davidson’s guilt, revoked his community supervision , sentenced him to twenty

- four months’ confinement in state jail, and assessed him court costs of $76. 99

. Davi dson ’ s appellate counse l filed a b rief that outlined t he procedural history of the case, provided a detailed summary of the evidence elicited duri ng the trial court proceedings, and stated that counsel found no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Couns el provided a professio nal evaluat ion of the record a nd demonstrat ed why t her e are no arguable grounds to be
advanced , as required by law

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 743

– 44 (1967); In re
Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) ( orig. proceeding); Staf ford v. Stat e , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

– 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812

– 13 (Tex.
Cr im. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Davidson ’ s counsel filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal a nd provided Davidson wi th copies of the brief an d the motion to withdraw. On November 30, 2023, David son ’ s counsel also informed him of h is right s to review the record and to file a pro se response and provided him with a paper copy of the appellate record

. By letter

1 Se e T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN

. § 481.115(b) (Supp .)

.3

dated Novem ber 30 , 20 23, we notified Davidso n that his pro se response was due on or before January 2 , 202 4

. We also notified Davidson by letter dated January 11 , 202 4 , tha t t he case
would be su bmitted on briefs on February 1 , 202 4

. David son did not file a pro se respon se
. W e have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the entire appellate record and, like counsel, have determined that no arguable issue support s an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2 005). In
the Anders context, once we determine that th e appeal is without merit, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. See i d. 2

Charle s van Cleef Justice
Date Submitte d: February 1, 2024 Date Decided: February 27 , 2024
Do Not Publish

2 Since w e agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders , grant counsel’s request to withdr aw from furt her representation of appellant in this case. See Anders , 386 U

. S. at 744. No substitute counsel will be app ointed. Sho uld appellant desire to seek furt her review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, appellant must e it her ret ain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a p ro se petition for discretionary review. A ny petit ion for disc retionary review (1) m ust be filed within thirty days from eit her the date of this opini on or the date on which t he last t imely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court, see T EX . R. A PP . P. 6 8.2, (2) must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, s ee T EX . R. A PP

. P. 68.3, and (3) should comply with the requiremen ts of Rule 68.4 of the Te xas Rules of Appellate Procedure, see T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.4.