alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.1 

OAR Box 1878 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

79)11-1-10 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 11/28/20081:21:24 PM Sheet 79 of 145 
P.2 

A-90-19 

II-I-9 

C 3 

laging 

rocess 

>nt de 

;orpoi UmHANDBOOK OF 

TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS 

CHEMICALS AND 

CARCINOGENS 

Second Edition 

by 

Marshall Slttig 

Princeton University 

A<&-

np NOYES PUBLICATIONS 

Parfc Rid*, N M Jwwy. U.J.A. 

RADIAN LIBRARY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC 

RMHHM 
Copyright ©1985 by Marshall Sittig 

No part of thit book may bt reproduced in any form 

without permission in writing from tha Publisher. 

Library of Congrats Catalog Card Number: 84-22755 

ISBN: 0-8165-10094 

Printed in the United States 

Published in the United States of America by 

Noyes Publications 

Mill Road, Park Ridge. New Jersey 07656 

10 987654 3 

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data 

Sittig. Marshall. 

Handbook of toxic and hazardous chemicals and 

carcinogens. 

Bibliography: p. 

Includes index. 

1. Poisons-Dictionaries. 2. Hazardous substancesDictionaries. 3. Carcinogens-Dictionaries. I. Title. 

RA1193.SS8 1985 615.9'02 84-22755 

ISBN 04155-10094 

0 M 

publ I 

But i 

Cana 

off ic 

>\: 

u&*$BF
#### § 1304.1 General provisions.

This part contains the rules that the Millennium Challenge Corporation (“MCC”) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) (5 U.S.C. 552). The rules in this part should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Fee Guidelines”). In addition, the MCC FOIA web page contains information about the specific procedures particular to MCC with respect to making FOIA requests. This resource is available at *www.mcc.gov/resources/foia*.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004     /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 38.154 Regulatory services provided by a third party. ( a ) *Use of third-party provider permitted.* A designated contract market may choose to utilize a registered futures association or another registered entity, as such terms are defined under the Act, (collectively, “regulatory service provider”), for the provision of services to assist in complying with the core principles, as approved by the Commission. Any designated contract market that chooses to utilize a regulatory service provider must ensure that its regulatory service provider has the capacity and resources necessary to provide timely and effective regulatory services, including adequate staff and automated surveillance systems. A designated contract market will at all times remain responsible for the performance of any regulatory services received, for compliance with the designated contract market's obligations under the Act and Commission regulations, and for the regulatory service provider's performance on its behalf.
( b ) *Duty to supervise third party.* A designated contract market that elects to utilize a regulatory service provider must retain sufficient compliance staff to supervise the quality and effectiveness of the services provided on its behalf. Compliance staff of the designated contract market must hold regular meetings with the regulatory service provider to discuss ongoing investigations, trading patterns, market participants, and any other matters of regulatory concern. A designated contract market also must conduct periodic reviews of the adequacy and effectiveness of services provided on its behalf. Such reviews must be documented carefully and made available to the Commission upon request.
( c ) *Regulatory decisions required from the designated contract market.* A designated contract market that elects to utilize a regulatory service provider must retain exclusive authority in decisions involving the cancellation of trades, the issuance of disciplinary charges against members or market participants, and the denials of access to the trading platform for disciplinary reasons. A designated contract market may also retain exclusive authority in other areas of its choosing. A designated contract market must document any instances where its actions differ from those recommended by its regulatory service provider, including the reasons for the course of action recommended by the regulatory service provider and the reasons why the designated contract market chose a different course of action.
1
                                 `United States
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) November 27, 2001


                    Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


              Bermuda                      1-4668                  None
-----------------------------------  ------------------       ----------------
(State or other jurisdiction            (Commission             (IRS employer
       of incorporation)                 File Number)       Identification No.)


Clarendon House, Church Street, Hamilton HM  DX, BERMUDA        None
----------------------------------------------------------    -------
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (441) 295-1422

                                 Not Applicable
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


<PAGE>


                                    FORM 8-K

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.



Item 5.   Other Events

         On November 27, 2001, Coastal Petroleum Company ("Coastal"), a majority
owned subsidiary of Coastal Caribbean Oils & Minerals, Ltd. (the "Company")
announced that Florida's Leon County Circuit Court has set a trial date of
September 30, 2002 for Coastal's lawsuit against the State of Florida. In the
lawsuit, Coastal claims that the State has taken Coastal's 440,000 acre
leasehold along Florida's Gulf Coast without compensation.

         A copy of the November 27, 2001 press release issued by the Company is
filed herewith as an exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

          (c)    Exhibits

                 (99)      Additional Exhibits

                                    (a)   Press Release of Coastal Petroleum
                                          Company dated November 27, 2001.





<PAGE>





                                    FORM 8-K

                                   SIGNATURES


          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                     COASTAL CARIBBEAN OILS & MINERALS, LTD.
                                    (Registrant)



                     By /s/ Benjamin W. Heath
                            ------------------
                            Benjamin W. Heath
                            President

Date:  December 10, 2001
§ 1003.3 Access to records. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by law or regulation any individual upon request may gain access to his or her record or to any information pertaining to him or her which is contained in any system or records maintained by the Inter-American Foundation. The individual will be permitted, and upon his or her request, a person of his or her own choosing permitted to accompany him or her, to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensible to him or her. The Inter-American foundation will require, however, a written statement from the individual authorizing discussion of that individual's record in the accompanying person's presence.
( b ) Any individual may request amendment of any Inter-American Foundation record pertaining to him or her. Not later than 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of such request, the Inter-American Foundation will acknowledge in writing such receipt. The Inter-American Foundation will also promptly either: ( 1 ) Correct any part thereof which the individual believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete; or
( 2 ) Inform the individual of the Inter-American Foundation's refusal to amend the record in accordance with his or her request, the reason for the refusal, the procedures by which the individual may request a review of that refusal by the Administrator or designee, and the name and address of such official.
( c ) Any individual who disagrees with the Inter-American Foundation's refusal to amend his or her record may request a review of such refusal. The Inter-American Foundation will complete such review not later than 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the date on which the individual requests such review and make a final determination unless, for good cause shown, the Administrator extends such 30-day period. If, after review, the Administrator or designee also refuses to amend the record in accordance with the request the individual will be advised of the right to file with the Inter-American Foundation a concise statement setting forth the reasons for his or her disagreement with the Inter-American Foundation's refusal, and also advised of the provisions for judicial review of the reviewing official's determination (5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(A)).
( d ) In any disclosure, containing information about which the individual has filed a statement of disagreement, occurring after the filing of the statement under paragraph (c) of this section, the Inter-American Foundation will clearly note any part of the record which is disputed and provide copies of the statement (and, if the Inter-American Foundation deems it appropriate, copies also of a concise statement of the Inter-American Foundation's reasons for not making the amendments requested) to persons or other agencies to whom the disputed record has been disclosed.
( e ) Nothing in 5 U.S.C. 552a, however, allows an individual access to any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.
[41 FR 19211, May 11, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 37368, July 21, 1977]
### §2208. Payments in lieu of taxes

In order to render financial assistance to those States and localities in which the activities of the Commission are carried on, and in which the Commission has acquired property previously subject to State and local taxation, the Commission is authorized to make payments to State and local governments in lieu of property taxes. Such payments may be in the amounts, at the times, and upon the terms the Commission deems appropriate, but the Commission shall be guided by the policy of not making payments in excess of the taxes which would have been payable for such property in the condition in which it was acquired, except in cases where special burdens have been cast upon the State or local government by activities of the Commission, the Manhattan Engineer District or their agents. In any such case, any benefit accruing to the State or local government by reason of such activities shall be considered in determining the amount of the payment.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §168, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 952; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1809(b) of this title, prior to the general amendment and renumbering of act Aug. 1, 1946, by act Aug. 30, 1954.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 72201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Board of Scientific 
Counselors

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) 
announces the following committee meeting.
    Name: Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC), NCHS.
    Times and Dates: 2 p.m.-5:30 p.m., January 27, 2005. 8:30 a.m.-2 
p.m., January 28, 2005.
    Place: NCHS Headquarters, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 
20782.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 100 people.
    Purpose: This committee is charged with providing advice and making 
recommendations to the Secretary; the Director, CDC; and Director, 
NCHS, regarding the scientific and technical program goals and 
objectives, strategies, and priorities of NCHS.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The agenda will include welcome remarks by 
the Director, NCHS; introductions of members and key NCHS staff; 
scientific presentations and discussions; and an open session for 
comments from the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make an oral presentation should 
be submitted in writing to the contact person listed below by close of 
business, January 14, 2005. All requests to make oral comments should 
contain the name, address, telephone number, and organizational 
affiliation of the presenter. Written comments should not exceed five 
single-spaced typed pages in length and should be received by the 
contact person listed below by close of business, January 14, 2005.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Weinzimer, Executive Secretary, 
NCHS, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 7108, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, 
telephone (301) 458-4565, fax (301) 458-4021.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 04-27188 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Helen J. Anderson, Deceased. Louis Serra, as Executor of Helen J. Anderson, Deceased, Appellant; Hjalmar Johansson, Respondent.

In a contested probate proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, granting respondent’s cross motion for an examination before trial of the subscribing witnesses as such, of appellant as an adverse party and of a prospective witness, and providing for other relief. The only questions presented on this appeal relate to certain of the items allowed with respect to the examination before trial. Order modified by striking therefrom the last ordering paragraph and by *972deleting from the next to the last ordering paragraph items designated (e), (h) and (i) and by inserting in item designated (k) at the end thereof the words *“*during her lifetime ” and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Assuming that in a proper case an examination as to transactions occurring after the death of the decedent might be permissible, the facts set forth in respondent’s motion papers are totally insufficient to justify a finding that evidence of such transactions is material and necessary to respondent’s case. MacCrate, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71759

Agency No. A092-172-236

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Gonzalez-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

remand based on ineffective assistance of counsel, and dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

FILED

DEC 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71759

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to

remand, Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005), and review de

novo questions of law, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.

2005). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Gonzalez-Ramirez’s challenge to the IJ’s

reliance on the Form I-213, Record of Deportable Alien, because he failed to raise

the issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. 

See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (this court lacks

jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the BIA). 

We also lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of

removal as a matter of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Gonzalez-Ramirez’s motion

to remand where he failed to establish prejudice from his counsel’s alleged

ineffective assistance. See Mohammed, 400 F.3d at 793-94 (to prevail on an

ineffective assistance of counsel claim, petitioner must show that counsel’s actions

may have affected the outcome of the proceedings).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Gonzalez-Ramirez’s claim

regarding compliance with Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
§ 5.9 Security deposits for retail forex transactions. ( a ) Each futures commission merchant engaging, or offering to engage, in retail forex transactions and each retail foreign exchange dealer must collect from each retail forex customer a minimum security deposit for each retail forex transaction equal to the applicable percentage as set by the registered futures association of which they are a member; *Provided,* that the registered futures association's security deposit requirement cannot be less than: ( 1 ) 2% of the notional value of the retail forex transaction for major currency pairs and 5% of the notional value of the retail forex transaction for all other currency pairs;
( 2 ) For short options, 2% for major currency pairs and 5% for all other currency pairs of the notional value of the retail forex transaction, plus the premium received by the retail forex customer; or
( 3 ) For long options, the full premium charged and received by the futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer from the retail forex customer.
( b ) Security deposits must be made in the form of cash or other financial instruments that comply with the requirements specified in § 1.25 of this chapter.
( c ) A futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer is required to collect additional security deposits from a retail forex customer, or liquidate the retail forex customer's positions, if the amount of the retail forex customer's security deposits maintained with the futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer are not sufficient to meet the requirements of this section.
( d ) A major currency pair security deposit percentage is only applicable when both sides of a retail over-the-counter foreign exchange transaction involve major currencies.
( e ) Any registered futures association whose members serve as counterparties to retail forex transaction shall designate which currencies are “major currencies”, and shall review, no less frequently than annually, major currency designations and security deposit requirements, and shall adjust the designations and requirements as necessary.