alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Transport Rule Public Hearing 

Wyndham Chicago Hotel, Chicago, Illinois, August 19, 2010 

SPEAKERS 

NAME ORGANIZATION 

Ailey, John Citizen 

Berman, Joshua Natural Resources Defense Council 

Blumenshine, Joyce Sierra Club, Heart of Illinois Group 

Burrows, Byron T. Tampa Electric Company 

Cerullo, Art American Lung Association 

Chartier, Daniel Edison Electric Institute 

Collins, Ashley Respiratory Health Association of Metropolitan Chicago 

DiMeo, Daniel Sierra Club/Citizen/Student 

Fuller, Tony Citizen 

Gehrig, Jan Cool Cities Joliet 

Gifford, Casey Sierra Club 

Gomez, Rose Citizen 

Harant, Joyce Citizen 

Headington, Maureen Stand Up/Save Lives Campaign 

Headington, Vincent Citizen 

Hodina, Jim Linn County, Iowa Public Health Dept., NACAA 

Howell, Ryan Greenpeace USA 

Johnson, Michael R. Greenpeace USA 

Knezevic, Laura Illinois Student Environmental Coalition 

Mead-Lucero, Jerry PERRO (Pilsen Environmental Rights and Reform Organization) 

Meints Fox, Tracy Citizen 

Nolen, Janice E. American Lung Association 

Owen, Verena Sierra Club 

Ringle, Weeks Citizen 

Schraufnagel, Dean University of Illinois, Chicago 

Stuckey, Richard J. Citizen 

Tin, Angela American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest 

Trzupek, Richard Mostardi Platt Environmental 

Wochos, Sarah K. Environmental Law & Policy Center 
ATTENDEES 

NAME ORGANIZATION 

Aburano, Doug US EPA 

Alvarez, Gilberto US EPA, Region 5 

Clark, Jeff US EPA 

Clayborn, Becki Sierra Club 

Cortelyou-Lee, Jan US EPA 

Darin, Jack Sierra Club, Illinois Chapter 

Faur, Cynthia A. Quarles & Brady LLP 

Gross, Louise US EPA, Region 5 

Gulezian, Sarah Sierra Club, Illinois Chapter 

Havell, Mary American Lung Association 

Helm, David Sargent & Lundy LLC 

Johnson, Kurt Environmental Law & Policy Center 

Kaisek, Kathy Cool Joliet 

Lavey, Warren Environmental Law & Policy Center 

Lee, Angie Hoosier Energy, Indiana 

Lorenz, Katie American Lung Association 

McKay, Melissa Sloane & Company 

McKinley, Gobeail US EPA 

Nannicelli, Christine Sierra Club 

Napolitano, Sam US EPA 

Nesbit, Craig E. Exelon Corporation 

Philips, Jeff ASGK Public Strategies 

Salisbury, Heather M. Valerio Dewalt Train Associates, Inc. 

Rodman, Sonja US EPA 

Saltman, Tamara US EPA 

Smith, Tim US EPA 

Stiener, Elyse US EPA 

Summerhays, John US EPA, Region 5 

Thompson, Karen US EPA, Region 5 

Zeman, Christine City of Springfield, Illinois, City Water, Light, and Power
§ 50.2 Treatment of swaps subject to a clearing requirement. ( a ) All persons executing a swap that: ( 1 ) Is not subject to an exception under section 2(h)(7) of the Act or § 50.50 of this part; and
( 2 ) Is included in a class of swaps identified in § 50.4 of this part, shall submit such swap to any eligible derivatives clearing organization that accepts such swap for clearing as soon as technologically practicable after execution, but in any event by the end of the day of execution.
( b ) Each person subject to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section shall undertake reasonable efforts to verify whether a swap is required to be cleared.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, persons that are not clearing members of an eligible derivatives clearing organization shall be deemed to have complied with paragraph (a) of this section upon submission of such swap to a futures commission merchant or clearing member of a derivatives clearing organization, provided that submission occurs as soon as technologically practicable after execution, but in any event by the end of the day of execution.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ricky Gail PIERCE, Sr., also known as Preacher, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-60067

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 19, 2007.

James Donald Maxwell, II, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*277Ricky Gail Pierce, Sr., Butner, NC, pro se.

Thomas Constantine Levidiotis, Oxford, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ricky Gail Pierce, Sr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pierce has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Pierce’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Pierce’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
AFS-09-218-E

Jul 12 2010

Mr. Freddy Pearce

Director of Maintenance

Aero Contractors. Ltd.

P.O. Box 1139 Smithfield, NC 27577

Dear Mr. Pearce:

This is in response to your letter dated April 17, 2009, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aero Contractors, Ltd. (Aero Contractors), for an exemption from § 125.226 of Title 14, Code of Feder al Regulations (14 CFR) in order to operate four EADS CASA CN-235 aircraft without a fl ight data recorder that records 88 parameters as required by that regulation.

Your letter indicates that the four aircraft were m anufactured in March 2002 and “imported under the guideline as operating as a 14 CFR Part 9 1 aircraft.” The FAA presumes that statement means that you purchased or leased the ai rcraft with the intent to operate them under part 91. Your letter indicates that you now wish to operate them under part 125, and that the aircraft do not meet the flight recorder r equirements of § 125.226. You state that the aircraft do meet the requirements for § 125.225 by recording the 11 parameters required by that regulation. You stated that you would operate the airplane under § 125.225 “until February 2, 2012, which is the mandatory date for a ll transport category aircraft to meet § 125.226 Appendix E” while you search for a more eco nomical solution to compliance with §

125.226.

Your letter indicates a misunderstanding of the reg ulations of part 125. To operate under part 125, § 125.226(e) requires that airplanes manu factured after August 18, 2000, must record the first 57 parameters of flight data liste d in § 121.226(a) in accordance with Appendix E of part 125. Aircraft manufactured afte r August 19, 2002, must record all 88 parameters. Compliance is required as of the date the aircraft are brought into a part 125 operation; they cannot be operated under part 125 w ithout the equipment.2

The February 2, 2012, date to which you refer is li sted in § 125.3(d) and states that after that date, no deviations (not exemptions) from the fligh t recorder requirements of part 125 will be allowed. If you have a previously issued deviation , it will no longer be effective after that date. That section does not provide new deviation s, nor does it forgive or delay compliance with § 125.226 when no deviation exists.

In either case, compliance with § 125.225 is not an option. That section is applicable only to certain older aircraft listed by model in § 125.226 (l)(2). Compliance with § 125.225 is not optional for newer airplanes.

In addition to this misunderstanding of the flight recorder regulations of part 125, your request for an exemption does not include all of the inform ation required by 14 CFR part 11, including an explanation why a grant of your reques t would be in the public interest.

Accordingly, your request for an exemption is denie d, and Docket number FAA-2009-0388 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
### §§2297e to 2297e–7. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3116(a)(1), Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–349

Section 2297e, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1601, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2939, related to assessment by United States Enrichment Corporation of viability of commercialization of AVLIS (atomic vapor laser isotope separation technology) and alternative uranium enrichment technologies.

Section 2297e–1, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1602, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2939, related to transfer of rights and property to Corporation.

Section 2297e–2, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1603, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2940, related to predeployment activities by Corporation.

Section 2297e–3, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1604, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2940; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(2), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516, related to Corporation sponsorship of private for-profit corporation to construct AVLIS and alternative technologies.

Section 2297e–4, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1605, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2942, related to AVLIS Commercialization Fund within Corporation.

Section 2297e–5, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1606, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2942, related to Department research and development assistance.

Section 2297e–6, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1607, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2942, related to site selection.

Section 2297e–7, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1608, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2942, related to exclusion from Price-Anderson coverage.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective as of date on which 100 percent of ownership of United States Enrichment Corporation has been transferred to private investors (July 28, 1998), see section 3116(a)(1) of Pub. L. 104–134, set out as a note under former section 2297 of this title.
Exhibit 33.12

 

|  |
|--|

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2019, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).

National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2019 and for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”).  NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.  NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.  The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo

Executive,Operations

January 30, 2020
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 6-17-11 Meeting with ARIPPA and EPA on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

 

On June 17, 2011, EPA met with members of ARIPPA to discuss their issues and concerns with 

the final rule entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid 

Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is 

referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that meeting, ARIPPA expressed concerns with how coal refuse would be regulated 

under the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information 

presented. 

Expected Meeting Attendees

Members from ARIPPA 

EPA Invitees: 

Suzanne Rudzinski 

Jim Berlow 

Robert Dellinger 

Betsy Devlin 

Sonya Sasseville
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0669 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | L 199 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Νομοθεσία | 61ό έτος7 Αυγούστου 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0669

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

L 199

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Νομοθεσία

61ό έτος7 Αυγούστου 2018

---

| Περιεχόμενα | | II   Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ |
| | * | Ενημέρωση για την έναρξη ισχύος της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και του Βασιλείου της Νορβηγίας σχετικά με τη διοικητική συνεργασία, την καταπολέμηση της απάτης και την είσπραξη απαιτήσεων στον τομέα του φόρου προστιθέμενης αξίας | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

II   Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις

Σελίδα

ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ

*

Ενημέρωση για την έναρξη ισχύος της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και του Βασιλείου της Νορβηγίας σχετικά με τη διοικητική συνεργασία, την καταπολέμηση της απάτης και την είσπραξη απαιτήσεων στον τομέα του φόρου προστιθέμενης αξίας

1

| EL | Οι πράξεις των οποίων οι τίτλοι έχουν τυπωθεί με λευκά στοιχεία αποτελούν πράξεις τρεχούσης διαχειρίσεως που έχουν θεσπισθεί στο πλαίσιο της γεωργικής πολιτικής και είναι γενικά περιορισμένης χρονικής ισχύος.
  Οι τίτλοι όλων των υπολοίπων πράξεων έχουν τυπωθεί με μαύρα στοιχεία και επισημαίνονται με αστερίσκο. |
| --- | --- |

EL

Οι πράξεις των οποίων οι τίτλοι έχουν τυπωθεί με λευκά στοιχεία αποτελούν πράξεις τρεχούσης διαχειρίσεως που έχουν θεσπισθεί στο πλαίσιο της γεωργικής πολιτικής και είναι γενικά περιορισμένης χρονικής ισχύος.

Οι τίτλοι όλων των υπολοίπων πράξεων έχουν τυπωθεί με μαύρα στοιχεία και επισημαίνονται με αστερίσκο.

---

II Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις

ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ

| 7.8.2018 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

L 199/1

---

Ενημέρωση για την έναρξη ισχύος της συμφωνίας μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και του Βασιλείου της Νορβηγίας σχετικά με τη διοικητική συνεργασία, την καταπολέμηση της απάτης και την είσπραξη απαιτήσεων στον τομέα του φόρου προστιθέμενης αξίας

Κατόπιν της υπογραφής στις 6 Φεβρουαρίου 2018, η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και το Βασίλειο της Νορβηγίας κοινοποίησαν αμοιβαία (στις 9 Ιουλίου 2018 και στις 26 Ιουνίου 2018 αντίστοιχα) την ολοκλήρωση των εσωτερικών νομικών διαδικασιών τους που αναφέρονται στο άρθρο 44 παράγραφος 1 της συμφωνίας (1).

1

Επομένως, η συμφωνία τίθεται σε ισχύ την 1η Σεπτεμβρίου 2018, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 44 παράγραφος 2 αυτής.

---

(1)  Συμφωνία μεταξύ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και του Βασιλείου της Νορβηγίας σχετικά με τη διοικητική συνεργασία, την καταπολέμηση της απάτης και την είσπραξη απαιτήσεων στον τομέα του φόρου προστιθέμενης αξίας (ΕΕ L 195 της 1.8.2018, σ. 3).

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James G. Ivey, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures****and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

a)             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 22, 2004 | By:    | /s/ JAMES G. IVEY       |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | James G. Ivey           |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 11**

**MARKWESTHYDROCARBON, INC.**

**COMPUTATION OFEARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE**

**(000s, exceptper share date)**

 
|                                                                             |   | **Three  Months Ended  September 30,**     |   | **Nine  Months Ended  September 30,** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                             |   | **2003**                                   |   | **2002**                              |   | **2003** |   | **2002** |   |
|                                                                             |   | **(in  thousands, except per share data)** |   |
| Net income (loss)                                                                |   | $                                          | (6,978 | )                                     | $      | (3,162 | ) | $ | 1,959 |   | $ | (5,060 | ) |
| Weighted average number of outstanding  shares of common stock                   |   | 9,378                                      |   | 9,374                                 |   | 9,364 |   | 9,369 |   |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share                                                  |   | $                                          | (0.74  | )                                     | $      | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.21 |   | $ | (0.54 | ) |
|                                                                             |   |                                       |   |                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income (loss)                                                                |   | $                                          | (6,978 | )                                     | $      | (3,162 | ) | $ | 1,959 |   | $ | (5,060 | ) |
| Weighted average number of outstanding  shares of common stock                   |   | $                                          | 9,378  |                                  | $      | 9,374 |   | 9,364 |   | 9,369 |   |
| Dilutive stock options                                                           |   | 22                                         |   | 11                                    |   | 16 |   | 16 |   |
| Weighted average number of outstanding  shares of common stock assuming dilution |   | 9,400                                      |   | 9,385                                 |   | 9,380 |   | 9,385 |   |
| Earnings (loss) per share assuming dilution                                      |   | $                                          | (0.74  | )                                     | $      | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.21 |   | $ | (0.54 | ) |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 In connection with theQuarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted S. Smith, Chief AccountingOfficer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ TED  S. SMITH        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Ted S. Smith             |
| Chief Accounting Officer |
|                     |
| August 11, 2004          |

 

1

----
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD

FRAMEWORK – FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Friday, July 17, 2015

Room 8E-089

Purpose The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding th is public meeting to discuss the energy conservation standard framework document. DOE will also explain its plans for the remaining rulemaking stages and analyses. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the rulemaking, including planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agenda

9:00 am-9:30 am Welcome; Intr oductions; Opening Statements
Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager

9:30 am-10:00 am Overview; Scope of Coverage
Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager

10:00 am-10:30 am Market and Technology Assessment; Screening Analysis
Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

10:30 am-10:45 am Break

10:45 am-11:30 am Engineering Analysis
Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

11:30 am-12:00 am Energy Use Analysis; Markups Analysis; Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

12:00 am-12:45 pm Lunch

12:45 pm-1:15 pm Shipments Analys is; National Impact Analysis
Michael Myer, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

1:15 pm-1:30 pm NOPR Analyses
Rachel Dickenson, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

1:30 pm-1:45 pm Questions; Closing Remarks
Lucy deButts, DOE Lighting Project Manager