alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.8 Exemption from certain requirements of rule 4.26 with respect to pools offered or sold in certain offerings exempt from registration under the Securities Act. ( a ) Notwithstanding paragraph (d) of § 4.26 and subject to the conditions specified herein, the registered commodity pool operator of a pool offered or sold solely to “accredited investors” as defined in 17 CFR 230.501 in an offering exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Rule 505 or 506 of Regulation D, 17 CFR 230.505 or 230.506, may solicit, accept and receive funds, securities and other property from prospective participants in that pool upon filing with the National Futures Association and providing to such participants the Disclosure Document for the pool.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (d) of § 4.26 and subject to the conditions specified herein, the registered commodity pool operator of a pool offered or sold in an offering exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Rule 505 or 506 of Regulation D, 17 CFR 230.505 or 230.506, that is operated in compliance with, and has filed the notice required by § 4.12(b) may solicit, accept and receive funds, securities and other property from prospective participants in that pool upon filing with the National Futures Association and providing to such participants the Disclosure Document for the pool.
( c ) The relief provided under § 4.8 is not available if an enforcement proceeding brought by the Commission under the Act or the regulations is pending against the commodity pool operator or any of its principals or if the commodity pool operator or any of its principals is subject to any statutory disqualification under §§ 8a(2) or 8a(3) of the Act.
[57 FR 34865, Aug. 7, 1992; 57 FR 41173, Sept. 9, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 38182, July 25, 1995; 72 FR 1662, Jan. 16, 2007]
#### Emma Greer, Appellant, v. Thomas Slater, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. All concur.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 369]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5104]]

Public Law 115-369
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  322 Main Street in Oakville, Connecticut, as the ``Oakville Veterans 
     Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 6335]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OAKVILLE VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 322 Main Street in Oakville, Connecticut, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Oakville Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Oakville 
Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6335:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1508.805 What notice does the debarring official give me if I am proposed for debarment? After consideration of the causes in § 1508.800 of this subpart, if the debarring official proposes to debar you, the official sends you a Notice of Proposed Debarment, pursuant to § 1508.615, advising you— ( a ) That the debarring official is considering debarring you;
( b ) Of the reasons for proposing to debar you in terms sufficient to put you on notice of the conduct or transactions upon which the proposed debarment is based;
( c ) Of the cause(s) under § 1508.800 upon which the debarring official relied for proposing your debarment;
( d ) Of the applicable provisions of this subpart, Subpart F of this part, and any other ADF procedures governing debarment; and
( e ) Of the governmentwide effect of a debarment from procurement and nonprocurement programs and activities.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                              November 13, 2002



                              THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



       Delaware             001-02217             58-0628465
   (State or other        (Commission           (IRS Employer
     jurisdiction         File Number)        Identification No.)
   of incorporation)



              One Coca-Cola Plaza
                Atlanta, Georgia                   30313
    (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404)676-2121


<PAGE>



Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

              On November 13, 2002, the Company filed with the Securities
         and Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ending September 30, 2002. In connection with such report, the
         Company submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission the
         Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal
         Financial Officer of the Company as required pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
         1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
         2002. Each of the foregoing Certifications are attached as Exhibits to
         this Report on Form 8-K.


                                       2

<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                    THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                                        (REGISTRANT)


Date:  November 13, 2002      By: /s/ GARY P. FAYARD
                                  ------------------
                                     Gary P. Fayard
                                     Senior Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       3

<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



 Exhibit No.
 -----------

    99.1        Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002
                executed by Douglas N. Daft, Chairman of the Board of Directors
                and Chief Executive Officer of The Coca-Cola Company

    99.2        Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                executed by Gary P. Fayard, Senior Vice President and Chief
                Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4161 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4161

   To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility 
 located in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2012

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility 
 located in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Quality Postal Delivery 
for the Future Act''.

SEC. 2. CLOSURE OR CONSOLIDATION OF POSTAL FACILITIES IN ZIP CODES WITH 
              HIGH POPULATION GROWTH.

    Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the 
Postal Service may not close or consolidate any post office or other 
postal facility that is located in a ZIP code that has a high rate of 
population growth.
    ``(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
subsection, and not later than 60 days after the end of each year 
thereafter, the Postmaster General shall determine, in consultation 
with the Secretary of Commerce, whether a ZIP code has a high rate of 
population growth for purposes of paragraph (1).
    ``(B) In making the annual determination required under 
subparagraph (A), the Postmaster General shall, using population data 
available from the Bureau of the Census, compare the population of a 
ZIP code at the end of such year with the population of such ZIP code 
at the beginning of such year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1008.625 Criminal drug statute.

*Criminal drug statute* means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance.
§ 242.609 Registration of securities information processors: form of application and amendments. ( a ) An application for the registration of a securities information processor shall be filed on Form SIP (§ 249.1001 of this chapter) in accordance with the instructions contained therein.
( b ) If any information reported in items 1-13 or item 21 of Form SIP or in any amendment thereto is or becomes inaccurate for any reason, whether before or after the registration has been granted, the securities information processor shall promptly file an amendment on Form SIP correcting such information.
( c ) The Commission, upon its own motion or upon application by any securities information processor, may conditionally or unconditionally exempt any securities information processor from any provision of the rules or regulations adopted under section 11A(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78k-1(b)).
( d ) Every amendment filed pursuant to this section shall constitute a “report” within the meaning of sections 17(a), 18(a) and 32(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q(a), 78r(a), and 78ff(a)).
§ 120.40 Compositional terms. ( a ) *Commodity* means any article, material, or supply, except technology/technical data or software.
( b ) An *end-item* is a system, equipment, or an assembled article ready for its intended use. Only ammunition or fuel or other energy source is required to place it in an operating state.
( c ) A *component* is an item that is useful only when used in conjunction with an end-item: ( 1 ) A *major component* includes any assembled element that forms a portion of an end-item without which the end-item is inoperable; and
( 2 ) A *minor component* includes any assembled element of a major component.
( d ) *Accessories and attachments* are associated articles for any component, equipment, system, or end-item, and which are not necessary for its operation, but which enhance its usefulness or effectiveness.
( e ) A *part* is any single unassembled element of a major or a minor component, accessory, or attachment which is not normally subject to disassembly without the destruction or the impairment of designed use.
( f ) *Firmware* and any related unique support tools (such as computers, linkers, editors, test case generators, diagnostic checkers, library of functions, and system test diagnostics) directly related to equipment or systems covered under any category of the U.S. Munitions List are considered as part of the end-item or component. Firmware includes but is not limited to circuits into which software has been programmed.
( g ) *Software* includes but is not limited to the system functional design, logic flow, algorithms, application programs, operating systems, and support software for design, implementation, test, operation, diagnosis, and repair. A person who intends to export only software should, unless it is specifically enumerated in § 121.1 of this subchapter (e.g., USML Category XIII(b)), apply for a license pursuant to part 125 of this subchapter.
( h ) A *system* is a combination of parts, components, accessories, attachments, firmware, software, equipment, or end-items that operate together to perform a function. Note 1 to paragraph (h):
The industrial standards established by the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide examples for when commodities and software operate together to perform a function as a system.
( i ) *Equipment* is a combination of parts, components, accessories, attachments, firmware, or software that operate together to perform a function of, as, or for an end-item or system. Equipment may be a subset of an end-item based on the characteristics of the equipment. Equipment that meets the definition of an end-item in paragraph (b) of this section is an end-item. Equipment that does not meet the definition of an end-item is a component, accessory, attachment, firmware, or software.
[87 FR 16411, Mar. 23, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 12213, Feb. 27, 2023]
#### J.B. Stell GAINES, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-10372

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 6, 2007.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*196PER CURIAM: *

J.B. Stell Gaines, Sr., Texas prisoner # 843480, appeals from the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his petition invoking 28 U.S.C. § 2241. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The district court recharacterized it as a petition for mandamus because Gaines was requesting that the district court issue an order directing the state courts in the performance of them duties. Because Gaines did not challenge the manner in which his sentence was being executed, the district court did not err in recharacterizing Gaines’s § 2241 petition as a petition for mandamus. *See Warren v. Miles,*230 F.3d 688, 694 (5th Cir.2000) (“Section 2241 ... is the proper habeas remedy for challenging the execution of a sentence.”). Nor did the district court err in then dismissing it. *See Moye v. Clerk, De Kalb County Superior Court,*474 F.2d 1275, 1275-76 (5th Cir.1973) (“[A] federal court lacks the general power to issue writs of mandamus to direct state courts and their judicial officers in the performance of their duties where mandamus is the only relief sought.”). Gaines also argues that under *Castro v. United States,*540 U.S. 375, 124 S.Ct. 786, 157 L.Ed.2d 778 (2003), the district court was required to notify him before recharacterizing his petition. Gaines’s reliance on *Castro*is misplaced, as *Castro*imposes a notice requirement “when a court recharacterizes a *pro se*litigant’s motion as a first § 2255 motion.” *Castro,*540 U.S. at 383, 124 S.Ct. 786.

. Gaines’s challenge to the district court’s use of the PLRA’s standard of review is unavailing. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

Gaines does not need a COA to appeal from the denial of either a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition or a petition for mandamus. *See Jeffers v. Chandler,*253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.2001); § 2253(c)(1). Gaines’s request for a COA is therefore DENIED as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
August 3, 2011 

Joseph A. Jennings 

15211 Coronado St. 

Westminster, CA 92683 

Dear Mr. Jennings: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We’ve received your June 6, 2011, petition for an exemption from § 21.197(a)(1) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow you to issue 

functional check flight permits. 

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0626) and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information. 

How We’ll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frances Shaver 

Program Analyst 

Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
#### § 1203.735-301 Conflicts of interest.

Special Government employees are subject to the conflicts of interest statutes (18 U.S.C. 202). An explanation of these conflicts of interest statutes their effects upon special Government employees and guidelines for obtaining and utilizing the services of special Government employees are in appendix C of chapter 735 of the Federal Personnel Manual. A special Government employee shall not have a direct or indirect financial interest that conflicts substantially, or appears to conflict substantially, with Government duties and responsibilities.
§ 1509.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each ADF award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the ADF official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by ADF officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (*e.g.*, all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the ADF awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the ADF awarding official.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3b-11 Definitions relating to limited partnership roll-up transactions for purposes of sections 6(b)(9), 14(h) and 15A(b)(12)-(13). For purposes of sections 6(b)(9), 14(h) and 15A(b)(12)-(13) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(9), 78n(h) and 78o-3(b)(12)-(13)): ( a ) The term *limited partnership roll-up transaction* does not include a transaction involving only entities that are not “finite-life” as defined in Item 901(b)(2) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.901(b)(2) of this chapter).
( b ) The term *limited partnership roll-up transaction* does not include a transaction involving only entities registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 *et seq.*) or any Business Development Company as defined in section 2(a)(48) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(48)).
( c ) The term *regularly traded* shall be defined as in Item 901(c)(2)(v)(C) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.901(c)(2)(v)(C) of this chapter).
[59 FR 63684, Dec. 8, 1994]
#### § 210.12-21 Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers.

| Column A—Name of issuer and title of issue1 | Column B—Balance held at close of period. Number of shares—principal amount of bonds and notes2 | Column C—Cost of each item3 4 | Column D—Value of each item at close of period3 5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 (a) The required information is to be given as to all securities held as of the close of the period of report. Each issue shall be listed separately. | | | |
| (b) Indicate by an appropriate symbol those securities which are non-income-producing securities. Evidences of indebtedness and preferred shares may be deemed to be income-producing if, on the respective last interest payment date or dates for the declaration of dividends prior to the date of the related balance sheet, there was only a partial payment of interest or a declaration of only a partial amount of the dividends payable; in such case, however, each such issue shall be indicated by an appropriate symbol referring to a note to the effect that, on the last interest or dividend date, only partial interest was paid or partial dividends declared. If, on such respective last interest or dividend date, no interest was paid or no dividends declared, the issue shall not be deemed to be income-producing. Common shares shall not be deemed to be income-producing unless, during the last year preceding the date of the related balance sheet, there was at least one dividend paid upon such common shares. List separately (1) bonds; (2) preferred shares; (3) common shares. Within each of these subdivisions classify according to type of business, insofar as practicable: e.g., investment companies, railroads, utilities, banks, insurance companies, or industrials. Give totals for each group, subdivision, and class. | | | |
| 2 Indicate any securities subject to option at the end of the most recent period and state in a note the amount subject to option, the option prices, and the dates within which such options may be exercised. | | | |
| 3 Columns C and D shall be totaled. The totals of columns C and D should agree with the correlative amounts required to be shown by the related balance sheet captions. State in a footnote to column C the aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes. | | | |
| 4 If any investments have been written down or reserved against by such companies pursuant to [§ 210.6-03(d)](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-210.6-03#p-210.6-03(d)), indicate each such item by means of an appropriate symbol and explain in a footnote. | | | |
| 5 Where value is determined on any other basis than closing prices reported on any national securities exchange, explain such other basis in a footnote. | | | |

[[47 FR 56844](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/47-FR-56844), Dec. 21, 1982, as amended at [83 FR 50208](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/83-FR-50208), Oct. 4, 2018]