alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2000h–4. Construction of provisions not to exclude operation of State laws and not to invalidate consistent State laws

Nothing contained in any title of this Act shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to occupy the field in which any such title operates to the exclusion of State laws on the same subject matter, nor shall any provision of this Act be construed as invalidating any provision of State law unless such provision is inconsistent with any of the purposes of this Act, or any provision thereof.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title XI, §1104, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 268.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241, known as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is classified principally to subchapters II to IX of this chapter (§2000a et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of this title and Tables.
5330.202-6 Responsibilities

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5330.2 — CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q as amended by this Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank M. Semple, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: October 20, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE     |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |  Frank M. Semple         |
|                        |   |  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: "Speer, Matthew" <mspeer@capitalpowerusa.com> 

 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Kopecky, Christopher L." <ckopecky@capitalpowerusa.com>, "Sweigart, Dave" <dsweigart@capitalpowerusa.com>, 

 "Dow, Jack" <jdow@capitalpowerusa.com>, "Nelson, David" <dnelson@capitalpowerusa.com>, "Edwards, John" 

 <jedwards@capitalpowerusa.com>, <mjsmith@capitalpower.com>, "Griffiths, Joseph" 

 <jgriffiths@capitalpowerusa.com> 

 

 Date: 07/16/2010 01:56 PM 

 Subject: Receipt Confirmation and Request for Extension 

Ms. Alicea: 

We are in receipt of the Information Collection Request (“ICR”) pursuant 

to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act for the facility identified in 

your database as Naval Station Energy Facility (Plant ID: 016360). 

The ICR requires a response within ninety (90) days of receipt. The 

Naval Station ICR was received at the facility on June 28, 2010 and 

responses would be due on September 26, 2010. However, as September 26, 

2010 is a Sunday, we interpret the submittal deadline to be Monday, 

September 27th, 2010. The scope of the request is very broad and will 

require a number of CPI personnel to spend considerable time in 

preparing the response. CPI is (i) currently in peak generating season; 

(ii) completing similar requests for the CPI North Carolina Roxboro and 

Southport facilities and (iii) responding to a request from EPA under 

Section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act with respect to the Roxboro 

facility. Given these factors, CPI personnel will have limited time to 

respond to the ICRs in a thorough and comprehensive manner. In order to 

insure an accurate and thorough response CPI respectfully requests an 

additional fifty nine (89) days, until December 24, 2010, to complete 

the responses. 

Please direct all future correspondence related to these ICRs to me at 

the address below with a copy to the General Manager of the Naval 

Station Energy Facility, Dave Sweigart, at the following address: 

 Naval Station Energy Facility 

 8835 Balboa Ave 

 Suite D 

 San Diego, CA 92123 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you have regarding 

this correspondence. Thank you. 

Matthew P. Speer 

for 

Chris Kopecky 

Christopher L. Kopecky 

Associate General Counsel 

Capital Power Operations (USA) Inc. 

2000 York Road, Suite 129 

Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 

(630) 413-5476 

(630) 413-5477 (fax) 

ckopecky@capitalpowerusa.com
### Part B—Supportive Services
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.1400 Form ABS-15G, Asset-backed securitizer report pursuant to Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This form shall be used for reports of information required by Rule 15Ga-1 (§ 240.15Ga-1 of this chapter).

[76 FR 4515, Jan. 26, 2011]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form ABS-15G, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
Part 5336 - Construction and ArchitectEngineer Contracts

DAFFARS PART 5336 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5336.2 – SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

5336.208 Concurrent Performance of Firm-Fixed-Price and Other Types of Construction Contracts

5336.209 Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms

5336.213-2 Presolicitation Notices

5336.270 Expediting construction contracts

5336.272 Prequalification of Sources

Subpart 5336.3 – TWO-PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

5336.301 Use of Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures

5336.303-1 Phase One

Subpart 5336.5 – CONTRACT CLAUSES

5336.507 Permits and Responsibilities

5336.570 Additional Provisions and Clauses

Subpart 5336.6 – ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES

5336.602-3 Evaluation Board Functions

5336.609-1 Design Within Funding Limitations

Subpart 5336.2 – SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR

CONSTRUCTION

5336.208 Concurrent Performance of Firm-Fixed-Price and Other Types of

Construction Contracts

See MP5301.601(a)(i).
5336.209 Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms

See MP5301.601(a)(i). Submit a copy of the approval to SAF/AQCA Workflow.

5336.213-2 Presolicitation Notices

(a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5336.270 Expediting construction contracts

(a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5336.272 Prequalification of Sources

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5336.3 – TWO-PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION

PROCEDURES

5336.301 Use of Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures

(b)(3)(vi) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5336.303-1 Phase One

(a)(4)(i)(B) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5336.5 – CONTRACT CLAUSES

5336.507 Permits and Responsibilities

When the clause at FAR 52.236-7, Permits and Responsibilities, is used in solicitations and contracts

OCONUS, the clause must be modified to reflect “host government and political subdivisions” in lieu

of “Federal, State, and Municipal.”

5336.570 Additional Provisions and Clauses

(b)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
Subpart 5336.6 – ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES

5336.602-3 Evaluation Board Functions

See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5336.609-1 Design Within Funding Limitations

(c)(1) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
§ 9.22 Appeal brief. ( a ) *Time to file.* Any person who has filed a notice of appeal in accordance with the provisions of § 9.20 must perfect the appeal by filing an appeal brief with the Proceedings Clerk within thirty days after service of the record of the exchange proceeding. The Commission may dismiss any appeal for which an appeal brief is not timely filed.
( b ) *Contents.* Each appeal brief submitted to the Commission pursuant to this section must include, in the order indicated: ( 1 ) A statement of the issues presented for review;
( 2 ) *A statement of the case.* The statement must first indicate briefly the nature of the case and include a full description of the disciplinary, access denial or other adverse action. There must follow a clear and concise statement of all facts relevant to the consideration of the appeal, including, if known, each alleged act or omission forming the basis of the exchange action, with appropriate references to the record of the exchange proceeding;
( 3 ) *An argument.* The argument may be preceded by a summary. The argument must contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, and citations to relevant authorities and to parts of the record of the exchange proceeding; and
( 4 ) A conclusion stating the precise relief sought.
( c ) *Length of appeal brief.* Without prior leave of the Commission, the appeal brief may not exceed thirty-five pages, exclusive of any table of contents, table of cases, index and appendix containing transcripts of testimony, exhibits, statutes, rules, regulations or similar materials.
##### 



Exhibit 18.1  Board of Directors
I-Sector Corporation As stated in note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements of I-Sector Corporation. and
subsidiaries (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company changed its
accounting policy for accounting for software contracts which fall under SOP 81-1 from using the
total cost input method to using the labor cost input method for its Stratasoft subsidiary.
Management believes the newly adopted method of applying the accounting principle is preferable in
Stratasofts circumstances because using labor cost as the input measure more accurately reflects
the labor intensive customization and modification that now occurs to the Stratasoft hardware and
software more evenly over the duration of Stratasofts projects. Accordingly, the labor cost input
method more appropriately measures the progress towards completion over the duration of
Stratasofts projects. At your request, we have reviewed and discussed with management the
circumstances, business judgment, and planning that formed the basis for making this change in
accounting principle. It should be recognized that professional standards have not been established for selecting
among alternative principles that exist in this area or for evaluating the preferability of
alternative accounting principles. Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for
purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose. Based on our review and discussion, we concur with managements judgment that the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating this position, we are
relying on managements business planning and judgment, which we do not find unreasonable. We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of I-Sector Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2004. Accordingly, we
are unable to express an opinion on whether the method of accounting for the effect of the
change is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America or if the financial information included in Part I of this Form 10-Q is fairly
presented. Very truly yours, /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP GRANT THORNTON LLP
###### Editorial Note on Part 49

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 49 appear at 85 FR 75672, Nov. 25, 2020.

#### § 49.7 Swap data repositories located in foreign jurisdictions.

Any swap data repository located outside of the United States applying for registration pursuant to § 49.3 of this part shall certify on Form SDR and provide an opinion of counsel that the swap data repository, as a matter of law, is able to provide the Commission with prompt access to the books and records of such swap data repository and that the swap data repository can submit to onsite inspection and examination by the Commission.
§ 1470.2 Definitions. ( a ) The term *Department* as used herein shall have the meaning set forth in 22 U.S.C. 3902 and 4103, and § 1421.4 of subchapter C of these regulations.
( b ) The terms *labor organization,* and *conditions of employment* as used herein shall have the meanings set forth in 22 U.S.C. 4102.
( c ) The term *Executive Director* means the Executive Director of the Federal Service Impasse Panel as defined in 5 U.S.C. 7119(c).
( d ) The terms *designated representative* or *designee* of the Panel means a Panel member, a staff member, or other individual designated by the Panel to act on its behalf pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 4110(c)(1).
( e ) The term *hearing* means a factfinding hearing, arbitration hearing, or any other hearing procedure deemed necessary to accomplish the purposes of 22 U.S.C. 4110.
( f ) The term *impasse* means that point in the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement at which the parties are deadlocked, notwithstanding their efforts to reach agreement by direct negotiations and other voluntary arrangements, if any.
( g ) The term *Panel* means the Foreign Service Impasse Disputes Panel described in 22 U.S.C. 4110(a) or a quorum thereof.
( h ) The term *party* means the Department or the labor organization participating in the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement.
( i ) The term *quorum* means three (3) or more members of the Panel.
( j ) The term *voluntary arrangements* means any appropriate technique, not inconsistent with the provisions of 22 U.S.C. 4110, used by the parties to assist in the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sixteenth census of the UnitedStates : 1940 : population : internal migration : 1935 to 1940 : economiccharacteristics of migrants.**
 
Chapters: 0405
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/31
Item Number:0213 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104964
 
August 26, 2019
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-2207 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2015-CE-003-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 74935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27466]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 74935]]


                Memorandum of December 8, 2004

                
Delegation of Certain Reporting Authority

                Memorandum for the Chairman of the Federal Labor 
                Relations Authority

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby delegate to the member who has been designated 
                by the President as Chairman the functions conferred 
                upon the President by 5 U.S.C. 7104(e) to provide the 
                specified report to the Congress.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 8, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-27466
Filed 12-13-04; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 242.906 Other duties of participants. ( a ) *Identifying missing UIC information.* A registered security-based swap data repository shall identify any security-based swap reported to it for which the registered security-based swap data repository does not have the counterparty ID and (if applicable) the broker ID, branch ID, execution agent ID, trading desk ID, and trader ID of each direct counterparty. Once a day, the registered security-based swap data repository shall send a report to each participant of the registered security-based swap data repository or, if applicable, an execution agent, identifying, for each security-based swap to which that participant is a counterparty, the security-based swap(s) for which the registered security-based swap data repository lacks counterparty ID and (if applicable) broker ID, branch ID, execution agent ID, trading desk ID, and trader ID. A participant of a registered security-based swap data repository that receives such a report shall provide the missing information with respect to its side of each security-based swap referenced in the report to the registered security-based swap data repository within 24 hours.
( b ) *Duty to provide ultimate parent and affiliate information.* Each participant of a registered security-based swap data repository that is not a platform, a registered clearing agency, an externally managed investment vehicle, or a registered broker-dealer (including a registered security-based swap execution facility) that becomes a participant solely as a result of making a report to satisfy an obligation under § 242.901(a)(2)(ii)(E)( 4 ) shall provide to the registered security-based swap data repository information sufficient to identify its ultimate parent(s) and any affiliate(s) of the participant that also are participants of the registered security-based swap data repository, using ultimate parent IDs and counterparty IDs. Any such participant shall promptly notify the registered security-based swap data repository of any changes to that information.
( c ) *Policies and procedures to support reporting compliance.* Each participant of a registered security-based swap data repository that is a registered security-based swap dealer, registered major security-based swap participant, registered clearing agency, platform, or registered broker-dealer (including a registered security-based swap execution facility) that becomes a participant solely as a result of making a report to satisfy an obligation under § 242.901(a)(2)(ii)(E)( 4 ) shall establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that it complies with any obligations to report information to a registered security-based swap data repository in a manner consistent with §§ 242.900 through 242.909. Each such participant shall review and update its policies and procedures at least annually.
[81 FR 53654, Aug. 12, 2016]
No: 16-027 May 11, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC, DOE to Hold Second Advanced Reactor Workshop June 7-8 in Maryland

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Department of Energy are continuing their joint 

workshop series on innovative reactor technologies June 7-8 in Bethesda, Md.

“These workshops bring all the interested parties to the table to discuss the opportunities and 

challenges for safely developing and deploying advanced non-light water reactors,” said Jennifer Uhle, 

director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “We’re going to focus on DOE’s and NRC’s strategic 

activities to support advanced reactor design, regulatory review and deployment.”

Registration for the workshop is available through May 27. The workshop is open to the public 

and will begin at 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, June 7, at the Bethesda North Marriott, 5701 Marinelli Road in 

Bethesda. The workshop will include presentations as well as structured and open discussions, using a 

facilitator. For more information on the workshop, please contact the NRC’s George Tartal (301-415-

0016 or george.tartal@nrc.gov) and Diane Jackson (301-415-5641 or diane.jackson@nrc.gov); or the 

DOE’s Craig Welling (301-903-0110 or craig.welling@nuclear.energy.gov) and Tom Sowinski (301-

903-0112 or thomas.sowinski@nuclear.energy.gov).
Subpart 3433.1—Protests

Parent topic: PART 3433—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

3433.103 Protests to the agency.

(d)(4)(i) All protests to the agency must be submitted to the contracting officer identified in the

solicitation. Interested parties may request an independent review of their protest as an alternative

to consideration by the contracting officer. If a protest is silent on this matter, the contracting officer

will decide the protest. The Department will not consider an appeal of the contracting officer's

protest decision.

(ii) If the protester requests an independent review, the HCA will decide the protest. In the event the

HCA is not at least one level above the contracting officer, or if the HCA has been substantially

involved in the procurement, the SPE will decide the protest.

(iii) Contracting officers must include the provision at 3452.233–70 in solicitations.

(f)(3) The contracting officer's HCA must approve the justification or determination to continue

performance.