Request to Use CARES Child Restraint System for Larger/Older Persons

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Bryce 

Bergeron to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though he exceeds 

the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or 

commercial operator operating under part 121 while Bryce is aboard its aircraft is granted an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Bryce to exceed 

the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system during use of that child 

restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 

Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My son Bryce is ___9__ year’s old, weighs __55___ pounds, and is _52_____ inches tall. My

son’s physical condition is as follows: he has autism accompanied with behavioral challenges 

and mild CP. As a result of his physical condition, Bryce needs the support and security 

provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of his weight is incapable of 

compliance with the regulation. I am also submitting the following contact

information: parents: Shelly and Brian Bergeron, 64 Wallis St. Douglas, MA 01516, can be

reached at brianshelly@charter.net or 508-335-1057.

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual 

passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. 

The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the 

airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Bryce Bergeron be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, 

manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This 

ensures a high level of safety for Bryce and a high level of safety for the other passengers and 

crew on the airplane. In fact, in Bryce’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and 

security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Bryce is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served 

by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows him to use 

commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Child 

Restraint System, he would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there 

can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES 

restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22- 44 pounds. However, the 

components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft 

and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.
I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the 

child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident 

scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the 

passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would 

mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated 

behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I 

propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Bryce only sits in a 

passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist 

for a passenger seated behind Bryce while he is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that 

all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Bryce’s parents or a 

caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Bryce’s parent or caregiver must 

carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in 

the Federal Register. We want to travel September 2, 2015 for a doctor’s appointment on 

September 3rd. If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and 

we may not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal 

Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use 

an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the 

weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this 

FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child 

be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), 

even though (she/he) exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the 

safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved 

Restraint System will provide for (her/him) during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Shelly and Brian Bergeron