alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §18119. Small business procurement

Part 19 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, section 644 of title 15, and any other applicable laws or regulations establishing procurement requirements relating to small business concerns (as defined in section 632 of title 15) may not be waived with respect to any contract awarded under any program or other authority under this Act or an amendment made by this Act.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1563, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10107(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 912.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 119, known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 18001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Another section 1563 of Pub. L. 111–148 enacted section 18120 of this title, section 9815 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, and section 1185d of Title 29, Labor, and amended sections 300gg–1 to 300gg–3, 300gg–9, 300gg–11, 300gg–12, 300gg–21 to 300gg–23, 300gg–25 to 300gg–28, 300gg–62, and 300gg–91 of this title.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Central Park Physical Medicine &amp; Rehab., P.C., as Assignee of LUIS CARCHI, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>National Liability &amp; Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Second District (Carl J. Copertino, J.), dated December 23, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, denied the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the fifth, seventh, ninth, eleventh, thirteenth and fifteenth causes of action.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved, insofar as is relevant to this appeal, for summary judgment dismissing the fifth, seventh, ninth, eleventh, thirteenth and fifteenth causes of action on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). In opposition, plaintiff argued with respect to those causes of action that defendant had failed to establish that it had timely mailed its IME scheduling letters and denial of claim forms. By order dated December 23, 2014, the District Court, among other things, denied those branches of defendant's motion. </p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that the IME scheduling letters at issue had been timely and properly mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]). Consequently, as defendant did not demonstrate that its 30-day period to pay or deny the claims had been tolled, defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the fifth, seventh, ninth, eleventh, thirteenth and fifteenth causes of action.</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.</p><p>Iannacci, J.P., Tolbert and Garguilo, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: October 31, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James E. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer of TS&B Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the quarter ended
         March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: May 20, 2003

                                              /s/ James E. Jenkins
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: James E. Jenkins
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
```
#### § 37.701 Required clearing.

Transactions executed on or through the swap execution facility that are required to be cleared under section 2(h)(1)(A) of the Act or are voluntarily cleared by the counterparties shall be cleared through a Commission-registered derivatives clearing organization, or a derivatives clearing organization that the Commission has determined is exempt from registration.
§ 41.45 Required margin. ( a ) *Applicability.* Each security futures intermediary shall determine the required margin for the security futures and related positions held on behalf of a customer in a securities account or futures account as set forth in this section.
( b ) *Required margin* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* The required margin for each long or short position in a security future shall be fifteen (15) percent of the current market value of such security future.
( 2 ) *Offsetting positions.* Notwithstanding the margin levels specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a self-regulatory authority may set the required initial or maintenance margin level for an offsetting position involving security futures and related positions at a level lower than the level that would be required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section if such positions were margined separately, pursuant to rules that meet the criteria set forth in section 7(c)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and are effective in accordance with section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act and, as applicable, section 5c(c) of the Act.
( c ) *Procedures for certain margin level adjustments.* An exchange registered under section 6(g) of the Exchange Act, or a national securities association registered under section 15A(k) of the Exchange Act, may raise or lower the required margin level for a security future to a level not lower than that specified in this section, in accordance with section 19(b)(7) of the Exchange Act.
[67 FR 53171, Aug. 14, 2002, as amended at 85 FR 75146, Nov. 24, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                             EXTRACTED FROM ANR PIPELINE COMPANY FORM 10-Q
                             QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                             1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                             TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000,000
       
                             <S>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                  23
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          522
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                             41
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       586
<PP&E>                                               3,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  322
<BONDS>                                                510
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                             874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,950
<SALES>                                                 49
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       629
<CGS>                                                   79
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        181
<INCOME-TAX>                                            66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    115
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
### §18814. State manufacturing leadership

#### (a) Financial assistance authorized

The Secretary may provide financial assistance on a competitive basis to States for the establishment of programs to be used as models for supporting the implementation of smart manufacturing technologies.

#### (b) Applications

#### (1) In general

To be eligible to receive financial assistance under this section, a State shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

#### (2) Criteria

The Secretary shall evaluate an application for financial assistance under this section on the basis of merit using criteria identified by the Secretary, including—

(A) technical merit, innovation, and impact;

(B) research approach, workplan, and deliverables;

(C) academic and private sector partners; and

(D) alternate sources of funding.

#### (c) Requirements

#### (1) Term

The term of an award of financial assistance under this section shall not exceed 3 years.

#### (2) Maximum amount

The amount of an award of financial assistance under this section shall be not more than $2,000,000.

#### (3) Matching requirement

Each State that receives financial assistance under this section shall contribute matching funds in an amount equal to not less than 30 percent of the amount of the financial assistance.

#### (d) Use of funds

A State may use financial assistance provided under this section—

(1) to facilitate access to high-performance computing resources for small and medium manufacturers; and

(2) to provide assistance to small and medium manufacturers to implement smart manufacturing technologies and practices.

#### (e) Evaluation

The Secretary shall conduct semiannual evaluations of each award of financial assistance under this section—

(1) to determine the impact and effectiveness of programs funded with the financial assistance; and

(2) to provide guidance to States on ways to better execute the program of the State.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $50,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2026.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title V, §40534, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1070.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Richard J. Scholin, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 12430;

Fourth District

August 15, 1974.

James R. Burgess, Jr., State’s Attorney, of Urbana (Donald R. Parkinson, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Oscar Marquis, Senior Law Student, of counsel), for the People.

Lawrence E. Johnson and Associates, of Champaign (L. Keith Hays, of counsel), for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE CRAVEN

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal by the State under Supreme Court Rule 604(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 110A, ft 604(a)), from an order dismissing two counts of a complaint and information brought against defendant for the alleged offense of theft. The dismissal was with leave for the State to file an amended information within 5 days. On appeal, the State urges two issues for review. However, we find that the appeal is improperly brought and should be dismissed.

The trial court dismissed the two counts on the ground that the complaint failed to adequately state the ownership of the property in question. The State was given 5 days to remedy the defect and file an amended information. Notwithstanding the fact the State did not inform the court it intended to stand on the original complaint, it immediately appealed.

*437 Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) permits the State to appeal “» * * an order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in dismissing a charge for any of the grounds enumerated in section 114 — 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963; * * It is true that section 114 — 1(a)(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, f 114 — (a) (8)) mandates that pursuant to defendant’s written motion, the charging instrument (indictment, information or complaint) must be dismissed if it fails to charge an offense. The State relies upon this provision to legitimize its appeal herein; however, the salient facts in this case do not demonstrate that the court’s order is sufficiently final as envisaged by Rule 604(a)(1) to warrant an appeal. The court’s order mandated that the State file an amended information within 5 days and that the defendant would be arraigned thereunder. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

SMITH, P. J., and SIMKINS, J., concur.
### §19171. Definition

In this part, the term "Director" means the Director of the National Science Foundation.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, §10511, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1613.)
### §256i. Community-based collaborative care network program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may award grants to eligible entities to support community-based collaborative care networks that meet the requirements of subsection (b).

#### (b) Community-based collaborative care networks

#### (1) Description

A community-based collaborative care network (referred to in this section as a "network") shall be a consortium of health care providers with a joint governance structure (including providers within a single entity) that provides comprehensive coordinated and integrated health care services (as defined by the Secretary) for low-income populations.

#### (2) Required inclusion

A network shall include the following providers (unless such provider does not exist within the community, declines or refuses to participate, or places unreasonable conditions on their participation):

(A) A hospital that meets the criteria in section 1396r–4(b)(1) of this title; and

(B) All Federally qualified health centers (as defined in section 1395x(aa) of this title 1 located in the community.

#### (3) Priority

In awarding grants, the Secretary shall give priority to networks that include—

(A) the capability to provide the broadest range of services to low-income individuals;

(B) the broadest range of providers that currently serve a high volume of low-income individuals; and

(C) a county or municipal department of health.

#### (c) Application

#### (1) Application

A network described in subsection (b) shall submit an application to the Secretary.

#### (2) Renewal

In subsequent years, based on the performance of grantees, the Secretary may provide renewal grants to prior year grant recipients.

#### (d) Use of funds

#### (1) Use by grantees

Grant funds may be used for the following activities:

(A) Assist low-income individuals to—

(i) access and appropriately use health services;

(ii) enroll in health coverage programs; and

(iii) obtain a regular primary care provider or a medical home.

(B) Provide case management and care management.

(C) Perform health outreach using neighborhood health workers or through other means.

(D) Provide transportation.

(E) Expand capacity, including through telehealth, after-hours services or urgent care.

(F) Provide direct patient care services.

#### (2) Grant funds to HRSA grantees

The Secretary may limit the percent of grant funding that may be spent on direct care services provided by grantees of programs administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration or impose other requirements on such grantees deemed necessary.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2015.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §340I, formerly §340H, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10333, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 970; renumbered §340I, Pub. L. 115–63, title III, §301(c)(2), Sept. 29, 2017, 131 Stat. 1172.)

1 So in original. A closing parenthesis probably should appear.
### §13620. Study

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall conduct a study to determine the extent to which Federal housing programs serve elderly families, disabled families, and families with children, in relation to the need of such families who are eligible for assistance under such programs. The Secretary shall submit a report to the Congress describing the study and the findings of the study not later than the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on October 28, 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §661, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3825.)
71876 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 237 / Friday, December 10, 2004 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service 

[REG–118662–98] 

Proposed Collection: Comment 

Request for Regulation Project; 

Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice and request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: This document contains a 

correction to a notice and request for 

comments, which was published in the 

Federal Register on Monday, November 

22, 2004 (69 FR 68003).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Allan Hopkins, (202) 622–6665 (not a 

toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice and request for comments 

that is the subject of this correction is 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). 

Need for Correction 

As published, the comment request 

for regulation project contains an error 

which may prove to be misleading and 

is need of clarification. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the 

comment request for regulation project, 

which was the subject of FR Doc. 04–

25873, is corrected as follows: 

On page 68003, column 2, under the 

caption SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:, 

the language, ‘‘Estimated Time per 

Respondent: 1 hr.’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hr., 

16 min’’.

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations 

Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate 

Chief Counsel, (Procedure and 

Administration).

[FR Doc. 04–27163 Filed 12–9–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
Part 521 [Reserved]

Parent topic: General Services Administration Acquisition Manual
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

March 9, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0168 – 

RECOMMENDATIONS ON ISSUES RELATED TO 

IMPLEMENTATION OF A RISK MANAGEMENT REGULATORY 

FRAMEWORK 

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendations to: 1) maintain the existing 

regulatory framework for the nuclear power reactor safety program area, and 2) refrain from 

developing an overarching, agencywide risk management policy statement. Additionally, the 

Commission agrees with the staff’s conclusions that a formal design-basis extension category of 

requirements should not be established, and a formal agencywide definition and criteria for 

determining the adequacy of defense in depth should not be developed. 

The staff should expeditiously complete the revision to Regulatory Guide 1.174 on defense in 

depth, in order to improve the clarity of the guidance, upon issuance of this SRM. 

The staff should inform the Commission prior to taking steps to “risk inform the response to 

operability issues of low safety significance.” 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.636 [Reserved]
#### § 31.27 Registered futures association membership.

Each person registered or required to register as a leverage transaction merchant must become and remain a member of at least one futures association which is registered under section 17 of the Act and which provides for the membership therein of such leverage transaction merchant, unless no such futures association is so registered.

[54 FR 41083, Oct. 5, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on [Part 240](/current/title-17/part-240?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at [57 FR 36501](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-36501), Aug. 13, 1992, and [57 FR 47409](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-47409), Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.36a1-2 Exemption from SIPA for OTC derivatives dealers.

Preliminary Note:

OTC derivatives dealers are a special class of broker-dealers that are exempt from certain broker-dealer requirements, including membership in a self-regulatory organization ([§ 240.15b9-2](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.15b9-2)), regular broker-dealer margin rules ([§ 240.36a1-1](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.36a1-1)), and application of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ([§ 240.36a1-2](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.36a1-2)). OTC derivative dealers are subject to special requirements, including limitations on the scope of their securities activities ([§ 240.15a-1](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.15a-1)), specified internal risk management control systems ([§ 240.15c3-4](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.15c3-4)), recordkeeping obligations ([§ 240.17a-3(a)(10)](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.17a-3#p-240.17a-3(a)(10))), and reporting responsibilities ([§ 240.17a-12](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.17a-12)). They are also subject to alternative net capital treatment ([§ 240.15c3-1(a)(5)](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.15c3-1#p-240.15c3-1(a)(5))).

OTC derivatives dealers, as defined in [§ 240.3b-12](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.3b-12), shall be exempt from the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ([15 U.S.C. 78aaa](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/78aaa) through [78lll](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/78lll)).

[[63 FR 59404](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-59404), Nov. 3, 1998]
#### Claire Shulman et al., Respondents, v. Marcus Lazarowitz, Defendant, and Samuel Kersh, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.