alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carol Russell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May  15, 2006                                  By: /s/ Carol Russell
                                                              --------------
                                                              Carol Russell
                                                              Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Fairbanks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007     By: /s/ Timothy Fairbanks Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 274.403 Form SE, form for submission of paper format exhibits by electronic filers.

This form shall be used by an electronic filer for the submission of any paper format document relating to an otherwise electronic filing, as provided in rule 311 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.311 of this chapter).

[58 FR 14861, Mar. 18, 1993]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form SE, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
§ 134.22 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Department of State may file an answer to the application. Unless the Department of State counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30 day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If the Department of State counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the adjudicative officer upon request by Department of State counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Department of State position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding the Department of State shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 134.26.
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATEMENT FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION FOR CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM I hereby certify, pursuant to my authority as Attorney General and in accordance with Section 3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (42 USC 690I et**),** and 40 CFR 271, that in my opinion the laws ofthe State of New Mexico provide adequate authority to carry out the hazardous waste program set forth in the Program Description submitted by the New Mexico Environment Department and to meet the requirements of40 C.F.R. Part 271, Subpart 

### A The specific authorities provided are contained in statutes or regulations lawfully adopted at the time this Statement is signed and which are in effect now. The statutory authorities for the State are documented in the State RCRA Statutory Checklist attached to this statement (See SPA Attachments). In my opinion, statutes relied on in previous approved authorization applications have not been amended, modified or revised by statute orjudicial decision in a way that diminishes and interferes with the authority to carry out the previously authorized hazardous waste program to meet the requirements of40 C.F

.R. Part 271, Subpart 

### A The provisions for which the State is seeking authorization are documented in the attached Regulatory Documentation for an incorporation by reference (IBR) state
. Differences between the state provisions and the Federal provisions are noted on the regulatory documentation. The official State regulations may be found in the Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, 20.4

. 1NMAC, effective October I, 2003

. This certification supplements my or my predecessors certification(s) ofJanuary 1985, September 1992, February 1994, July 1994, November 1994, August 1995, January 1996, October 2000, August 2006, October 2007 and September 2008. NMSA 1978, §§74-4-4A(I) and 74-4-4F (2002) provide New Mexico with authority to adopt federal hazardous waste regulations by reference

. Seal ofOffice

# C611~(~ 

# r**A/~~** Charles F

.Noble Assistant General Counsel Special Assistant Attorney General


### d-.OO 

## 9

New Mexico AG 

### Certification
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6696

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, a/k/a Allah-God Kundalini Isa 

Allah, and others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals, 

Federal BOP; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal BOP; 

KIMBERLEY WHITE, Regional Administrator, Inmate Appeals, 

Federal BOP, Mid-Atlantic Region; VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, 

Petersburg FCC, Federal BOP; JESUS M. HUERTAS, Supervisory 

Chaplain, Petersburg FCC, Federal BOP; MRS. BROWDER, Accoc. 

Chaplain, FCC Petersburg [medium] Federal BOP, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

No. 09-7180

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, a/k/a Allah-God Kundalini Isa 

Allah, and others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals, 

Federal BOP; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal BOP; 

KIMBERLEY WHITE, Regional Administrator, Inmate Appeals, 

Federal BOP, Mid-Atlantic Region; VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, 

Petersburg FCC, Federal BOP; JESUS M. HUERTAS, Supervisory 

Chaplain, Petersburg FCC, Federal BOP; MRS. BROWDER, Accoc. 

Chaplain, FCC Petersburg [medium] Federal BOP, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:06-cv-01061-TSE-TCB) 

Submitted: September 24, 2009 Decided: November 4, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William Henry Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Monika L. Moore, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

William Harrison appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Harrison’s complaint 

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of 

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and denying reconsideration of 

that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order granting the 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss for the reasons stated by the 

district court. With respect to the district court’s order 

denying reconsideration of that order, Harrison has forfeited 

appellate review of that order pursuant to 4th Cir. R. 34(b) and 

we therefore affirm that order. Harrison v. Watts, No. 

1:06-cv-01061-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 26 & June 9, 2009). We 

also deny Harrison’s motion to schedule oral argument as we 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

p09 17 

# Order

September 24, 2012

144394

PREMIER CENTER OF CANTON, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144394

COA: 297799

NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY Wayne CC: 08

- 017780

- CK

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Cross

- Plaintiff/Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

ASPHALT SPECIALISTS, INC.,

Defendant/Cross

- Defendant

- Appellant,

and

LOU’S TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., d/b/a

RENTAL SPECIALISTS, L.L.C., LOU’S SCRAP

TRANSPORT, INC., TKMS, LTD., DANIEL

ISRAEL and BRUCE ISRAEL,

Third

- Party Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 140.5 Overview.

This subpart sets forth the enforcement procedures applicable pursuant to § 140.4 to the various types of covered individuals and entities with respect to covered assistance. Section 140.6 establishes the procedures applicable to foreign government entities, including any such entity that is covered by the definition of a “foreign state” set forth in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1603(a). Section 140.7 establishes the procedures applicable to multilateral institutions and international organizations. Section 140.8 establishes the procedures applicable to recipients of scholarships and fellowships and participant trainees. Section 140.9 establishes the procedures applicable to non-governmental entities. Section 140.10 sets forth additional procedures applicable to intermediate credit institutions. Sections 140.11 through 140.14 contain general provisions related to the enforcement process.
#### § 1421.18 Regular and substantially equivalent employment.

*Regular and substantially equivalent employment* means employment that entails substantially the same amount of work, rate of pay, hours, working conditions, location of work, and seniority rights if any, of an employee prior to the cessation of employment in a Department because of any unfair labor practice under 22 U.S.C. 4115.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald A. Tywoniuk, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/GERALD A. TYWONIUK

Gerald
A. Tywoniuk
Chief Financial Officer

August 13,
2002

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD05-04-211]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Southern Branch of 
the Elizabeth River, Portsmouth, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of implementation of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
at 33 CFR 100.523 during the Olde Towne Holiday Music Festival 
Fireworks Show to be held December 11, 2004 on the Southern Branch of 
the Elizabeth River at Portsmouth, Virginia. These special local 
regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on 
navigable waters before, during and after the event. The effect will be 
to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of 
spectators and support vessels in the event area.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.523 will be enforced from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. EDT on 
December 11, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Bowling, Marine Events 
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Group Hampton Roads, 4000 Coast 
Guard Blvd., Portsmouth, Virginia 23703, (757) 483-8567.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of Portsmouth will sponsor the 
``Olde Towne Holiday Music Festival Fireworks'' on December 11, 2004 on 
the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River, Portsmouth, Virginia. In 
order to ensure the safety of participants, spectators and transiting 
vessels, 33 CFR 100.523 will be enforced for the duration of the event. 
The special local regulations will be enforced from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. 
e.d.t. on December 11, 2004. The pyrotechnic display will be launched 
from 1 barge located adjacent to Crawford Bay within the regulated 
area. Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.523, a vessel may not enter 
the regulated area unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated 
area but may not block a navigable channel.
    In addition to this notice, the maritime community will be provided 
extensive advance notification via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine 
information broadcasts, and area newspapers, so mariners can adjust 
their plans accordingly.

    Dated: November 24, 2004.
Ben R. Thomason, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, 
Acting.
[FR Doc. 04-26843 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1177

THOMAS H. FLUHARTY, in his official capacity as Bankruptcy Trustee; THOMAS J. JACQUEZ, husband; DIANA R. JACQUEZ, wife , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. CITY OF CLARKSBURG, a municipal corporation and political subdivision; JAMES C. HUNT; MARGARET H. BAILEY; MARTIN G. HOWE; ADAM BARBERIO; H. KEITH KESLING; JONATHAN R. DAVIS , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe rn District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Irene M. Keeley , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 00027

- IMK

- MJA )

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: January 8, 2018

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and Paula XINIS, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland , sitting by designation.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
J. Michael Benninger, BENNINGER LAW, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Jay T. McCamic, MCCAMIC, SACCO & MCCOID, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants. Keith C. Gamble, Kenneth L. Hopper, PULLIN, FOWL ER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Thomas Herbert Fluharty, Thomas J. Jacquez, an d Diana R. Jacquez appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. We agree with the district court that the Appellants’ action was barred by the applicable statute of l imitations and was not tolled or saved by the continuing violation doctrine. We also agree with the district court that the Appellants failed to establish a violation of their procedural due process rights. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated b y the district court. Fluharty v. City of Clarksburg , No. 1:14

-

cv
- 00027

- IMK

- MJA (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument wou ld not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, and its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007       /s/ Wayne A. Pratt Wayne A. Pratt    Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear at 68 FR 51358, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 141.10 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.