alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 270.6c-7 Exemptions from certain provisions of sections 22(e) and 27 for registered separate accounts offering variable annuity contracts to participants in the Texas Optional Retirement Program. A registered separate account, and any depositor of or underwriter for such account, shall be exempt from the provisions of sections 22(e), 27(i)(2)(A), and 27(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-22(e), 80a-27(i)(2)(A), and 80a-27(d), respectively) with respect to any variable annuity contract participating in such account to the extent necessary to permit compliance with the Texas Optional Retirement Program (“Program”), *Provided,* That the separate, account, depositor, or underwriter for such account: ( a ) Includes appropriate disclosure regarding the restrictions on redemption imposed by the Program in each registration statement, including the prospectus, used in connection with the Program;
( b ) Includes appropriate disclosure regarding the restrictions on redemption imposed by the Program in any sales literature used in connection with the offer of annuity contracts to potential Program participants;
( c ) Instructs salespeople who solicit Program participants to purchase annuity contracts specifically to bring the restrictions on redemption imposed by the Program to the attention of potential Program participants;
( d ) Obtains from each Program participant who purchases an annuity contract in connection with the Program, prior to or at the time of such purchase, a signed statement acknowledging the restrictions on redemption imposed by the Program; and
( e ) Includes in Part II of the separate account's registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 a representation that this section is being relied upon and that the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section have been complied with.
[49 FR 1479, Jan. 12, 1984, as amended at 85 FR 26102, May 1, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         155,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,334,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,652,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,677,000
<PP&E>                                     235,550,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,596,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             513,988,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,092,000
<BONDS>                                    225,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               513,988,000
<SALES>                                    135,443,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           135,443,000
<CGS>                                      109,958,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              122,891,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (140,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,073,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,339,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,646,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,693,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,693,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
                                


</TABLE>
#### § 1006.900 Adequate evidence.

*Adequate evidence* means information sufficient to support the reasonable belief that a particular act or omission has occurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Flores, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on November 26, 1975, convicting defendant, after trial, of possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and new trial directed. At the close of the sole prosecution witness’ testimony defense counsel requested "any notes the District Attorney may have made of statements of this police officer to them at the Criminal Court stage or the Grand Jury stage or pre-trial”. The Assistant District Attorney informed the court that no stenographically recorded statements existed and that he possessed only personal notes. The court viewed the notes *in camera*following which it concluded that they contained nothing inconsistent with the statements made by the witness on direct examination. It refused to turn the notes over to defense counsel. The People concede that certain statements which were not turned over prior to cross-examination should have been turned over, but contend that this constituted harmless error. We cannot agree. The proof of guilt in this case was not overwhelming and the *784material sought by counsel clearly comes within the rule of *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286). Defense counsel was entitled thereto irrespective of whether or not the statements were consistent with the prosecution witness’ direct testimony. *(People v Consolazio,*40 NY2d 446.) In the last-cited case the court held (p 454): "We hold, of course, that a failure to turn over *Rosario*material may not be excused on the ground that * * * a witness’ prior statements were totally consistent with his testimony at the trial [citing cases]. We thus reject arguments that consideration of the significance of the content or substance of a witness’ prior statements can result in a finding of harmless error.” The error committed was prejudicial to the defense and requires a new trial. Concur — Birns, J. P., Silverman, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AT&RNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AwaTlN** 

Bonoroble Geo. H. Sheppard Comptrollerof Publio.Aeoounts **Aimtin,** Texas
Dear Sir;

Ootober 17, 1939, C. E. Evans, President whioh you request an ot it is leg01 to pay Teachers College out of

proprlationBill also contains oertain

"Salary Provisions. No salary appropriatedherein shall be supplomcntedout of student fee funds, domitory funds, or local funds, exco t out of the Pure Fe94 Fund at the Agriculturnland Ret anical iit College or out of funds received from theUnited States Government or Its agencies, unless 30 orderedby the governingboard of the.

. Hon. Geo. Bl Sheppard,page 2

Institution to which such salary or salariesapply, at a regularmeeting with et least a majority of the members of such board present, and such order shellbe enb;eZed in theminutes of the proueedings of saidboard and shall set forth fully the reoaons therefor. No full time in3truCtiOn3l SRlRry es itemized herein shall be adjusted to exceed en amount above themaximum full professor's salary as herein itemized to be appropriated from the Genera1 Revenue Fund of the State for the partiouler institution towhich said salary or salariesapply, unless the maximum salary is being reoeived, inwhich case such adjustmentmay be made not to exceed ten per cent above suchmaximum salary 30 received.

. ." The seotion above quote& is the onlypossible limitation thatmight be applied to the instruotor~eright to receive compensation for his services in aoting as a judge or umpire in ethletio oontests.
It is to be noted, however, that the limitation set out in Seotion 2 does not apply in case of'supplemontoryfee bolng paid out by the athletic or extramuraldopnrtment because of Subseotion 11 of the gonornl provisions which read as follows: "Suboeotlon (11). Athletic or ExtramuralDepertmont. The General provisionsmade In thisAct shallhot apply to athletic or extramuraldepartments, nor to positions not contained in the Itemized appropriationAct for the fiscal year endingAugust 31, 1933; and as to these exceptions, the governingboard shallmake such neoeesary rules end adjustments as may be deemed odvlsable."
In the letter from Dr. Evans it is lndiaated that the Student Activity Funds are depositedwith the College end disbursedunder the generaldirection of the College by the governingboard of seidCollege. Subsection 11, above quoted, provides that auoh bisbursement may be made by aaid governing board.
It is the opinion of thisDepartment,Y therefore, that the Instructor of Science et Southwest Texns State Teachers Collegemay 0130 receive, out 0r the StudentActivity Fund, fees ror aoting ae judge,umpire, or Ureotor in athletio oontests.
Yours very truly
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

BG:N Approved Oct. 23, 1939 GERALD C. MNN ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS By: Billy Boldberg Assistant Approved: Opinion Committee By EWB, Chairman
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3135 KENNETH M. PEDELEOSE,

Petiitoner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

AT0752060350-R-1. ON MOTION 

### ORDER Kenneth M. Pedeleose moves for an extension of time to file his reply brief. Pedeleose's reply brief is timely; thus, the extension motion is moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is moot. FOR THE COURT 

# JUN11 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Kenneth M. Pedeleose Michael N. O'Connell, Esq. JUN 1`1 2009 WOW CIEW s17
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15Fb2-6 Registration of fiduciaries.

The registration of a security-based swap dealer or a major security-based swap participant shall be deemed to be the registration of any executor, administrator, guardian, conservator, assignee for the benefit of creditors, receiver, trustee in insolvency or bankruptcy, or other fiduciary, appointed or qualified by order, judgment, or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction to continue the business of such registered security-based swap dealer or a major security-based swap participant; Provided, that such fiduciary files with the Commission, within 30 days after entering upon the performance of his or her duties, an amended Form SBSE (§ 249.1600 of this chapter), Form SBSE-A (§ 249.1600a of this chapter), or Form SBSE-BD (§ 249.1600b of this chapter), as appropriate, indicating the fiduciary's position with respect to management of the firm and, as an additional document, a copy of the order, judgment, decree, or other document appointing the fiduciary.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sovereign Exploration AssociatesInternational, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"),the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|  
 

  Sovereign    Exploration Associates International, Inc.    BY: /s/ Robert D. Baca    Robert D. Baca, Chief Financial Officer    February 22, 2006
 

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 641

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISIONS I & IV

No. CR-15-72

J.F.

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered November 12, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE CRAIGHEAD

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

WESTERN DISTRICT

[NO. JV-2009-114]

HONORABLE LEE FERGUS, JUDGE

REVERSED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

This appeal is one of four cases to come before this court involving four juveniles who

were tried together as codefendants on charges of theft by receiving, a Class C felony, and

minor in possession.1 Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred by failing

to grant his motion to dismiss2

 because the only evidence of his guilt came from the testimony

of a codefendant.

We reverse appellant’s adjudication based on the analysis in a companion opinion

decided October 28, 2015, D.F. v. State, 2015 Ark. App. ___.; therefore, we adopt and

incorporate herein by reference the reasoning set forth in the companion case. 

Reversed. 

1

I.G. v. State, CR-15-74, D.F. v. State, CR-15-78 and A.I.M. v. State, CR-15-79. 

2Although appellant made a motion for a directed verdict during the adjudication

and argues on appeal error in denial of the motion for a directed verdict, a motion for

dismissal is generally made during a nonjury trial. Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1 (2014).
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 641

HARRISON, KINARD, GLOVER, AND BROWN, JJ., agree.

GLADWIN, C.J., dissents. 

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge, dissenting. I dissent based on the same

rationale expressed in D.F. v. State, 2015 Ark. App. ____.

Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Kristen C. Green, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
§ 75.1 Authority, purpose, scope, and relationship to other authorities. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the Commission under section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1851).
( b ) *Purpose.* Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act establishes prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading by, and investments in or relationships with covered funds by, certain banking entities. This part implements section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act by defining terms used in the statute and related terms, establishing prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and investments in or relationships with covered funds, and further explaining the statute's requirements.
( c ) *Scope.* This part implements section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act with respect to banking entities for which the CFTC is the primary financial regulatory agency, as defined in section 2(12) of the Dodd-Frank Act, but does not include such entities to the extent they are not within the definition of banking entity in § 75.2(c).
( d ) *Relationship to other authorities.* Except as otherwise provided under section 13 of the BHC Act, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the prohibitions and restrictions under section 13 of the BHC Act shall apply to the activities of an applicable banking entity, even if such activities are authorized for the applicable banking entity under other applicable provisions of law.
[79 FR 6048, Jan. 31, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 35021, July 22, 2019]
#### § 38.152 Abusive trading practices prohibited.

A designated contract market must prohibit abusive trading practices on its markets by members and market participants. Designated contract markets that permit intermediation must prohibit customer-related abuses including, but not limited to, trading ahead of customer orders, trading against customer orders, accommodation trading, and improper cross trading. Specific trading practices that must be prohibited by all designated contract markets include front-running, wash trading, pre-arranged trading (except for certain transactions specifically permitted under part 38 of this chapter), fraudulent trading, money passes, and any other trading practices that a designated contract market deems to be abusive. In addition, a designated contract market also must prohibit any other manipulative or disruptive trading practices prohibited by the Act or by the Commission pursuant to Commission regulation.
Exhibit 4.1


 


	
  No.

  	
   

  	
  Shares

  



 


MORGANS HOTEL GROUP CO.


 


This Certifies
that                                                                                                                                                         is
the owner of                                                                                fully
paid and non-assessable Shares of Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share, of the above-named
Corporation, transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof
in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused
this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorozed officers.


 


Dated                        ,
20         .


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 





















 


NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT

MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE

FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT

ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


 


For Value Received,
         hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto-


 


	
  PLEASE
  INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  



 


                                                                                                                 Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                                                    Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.


 


	
  Dated

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  In presence of
#### § 1203.735-302 Use of Government employment.

A special Government employee shall not use Government employment for a purpose that is, or gives the appearance of being, motivated by the desire for private gain for the employee or another person, particularly one with whom the employee has family, business, or financial ties.
1602.170-22 PSHB Program.

Postal Service Health Benefits (PSHB) Program means the Program established under 5 U.S.C.

8903c within the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

Parent topic: Subpart 1602.1—Definitions of FEHBP Terms
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFatigue Behavior of Coated Titanium AlloysAdvanced multi-component TiAlCrTaSiN-based multilayered coatings were developed and processed onto Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-6-4) and GammaMet PX (GMPX or TiAl) alloys by a magnetron-enhanced physical vapor deposition technique. The coatings have recently been in development with the goal of improving advanced titanium alloy, turbine engine component durability and oxidation-erosion resistance. In this work, the performance of the multi-component coating system (including the outer layer nitride based coating and inner TiAlCrSi oxidation barrier bond coat) was studied, and the coating's influence on the fatigue behavior of the titanium-based alloys were compared. Although the multi-component coating was initially optimized to improve the coating's high temperature oxidation and erosion resistance, the lower ductility nitride-based coating needs further work on microstructure or composition to improve its mechanical stress resistance and strain tolerance for use in cyclically loaded, turbine blade operating conditions. This is particularly true for GMPX and other γ-TiAl alloys because these intermetallic titanium alloys have limited ductility and are very sensitive to defects such as coating cracks. However, the inner layer TiAlCrSi-coating had better adhesion and ductility, and may be a suitable choice to improve the oxidation resistance of titanium alloys.Document ID20190026646Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsZhu, Dongming*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Lerch, Bradley A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kalluri, Sreeramesh*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 25, 2019Publication DateJune 1, 2019Subject CategoryMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2019-219999E-19607GRC-E-DAA-TN61136Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC13BA10BWBS: 585777.08.20.20.63.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsOxidation Barrier CoatingsMulticomponent Titanium Aluminide CoatingsAvailable DownloadsNameType20190026646.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 130.11 Supplementary reports. ( a ) Every applicant or supplier who is required under § 130.9 to furnish the information specified in § 130.10 must submit a supplementary report in connection with each sale in respect of which applicant or supplier has previously been required to furnish information if: ( 1 ) Any political contributions aggregating $2,500 or more or fees or commissions aggregating $50,000 or more not previously reported or paid, or offered or agreed to be paid by applicant or supplier or any vendor;
( 2 ) Subsequent developments cause the information initially reported to be no longer accurate or complete (as in the case where a payment actually made is substantially different in amount from a previously reported estimate of an amount offered or agreed to be paid); or
( 3 ) Additional details are requested by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls with respect to any miscellaneous payments reported under § 130.10(c).
( b ) Supplementary reports must be sent to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls within 30 days after the payment, offer or agreement reported therein or, when requested by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, within 30 days after such request, and must include: ( 1 ) Any information specified in § 130.10 required or requested to be reported and which was not previously reported; and
( 2 ) The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls license number, if any, and the Department of Defense contract number, if any, related to the sale.
[58 FR 39323, July 22, 1993, as amended at 71 FR 20554, Apr. 21, 2006]