alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5153.303-13 Format for Post Award

Congressional Notification When Utilizing

Authorities Conferred by DPC Class Deviation

2024-O0005—Temporary Authorizations for

Covered Contracts Related to Ukraine,

Taiwan, and Israel.

(Note: Please submit the below information and the ODASA(P) will provide congressional addresses)

Dear Mr. Chairman:

This notification is provided pursuant to Subsection 1244(a)(2) of the James M. Inhofe National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23 NDAA)(Pub. L. 117-263), as amended by

section 1242 of FY24 NDAA(Pub. L. 118-31).

The United States Army awarded the following contract action on (insert Month-Day-Year format)

and is providing notification.

a. Program Name:

b. Contract number, and modification number:

c. Total estimated contract value (including Options):

d. Contracting activity name and Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DODAAC):

e. Contractor name and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code:

f. Quantities and/or period of performance:

g. Specific authority used:

h. Reason for using the authority:

i. Expected outcome of using the authority, including estimated reductions in schedule:

Thank you for your continued support of defense programs and our Service men and women.

Sincerely,

Megan R. Dake

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement)

Parent topic: 5153.303 Agency forms.
#### § 270.3c-7 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70483, Aug. 30, 2024.
#### § 239.93 Form 1-U.

This form shall be used for filing current reports under Regulation A (§§ 230.251-230.263 of this chapter).

[80 FR 21918, Apr. 20, 2015]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 1-U, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
### §263a–4. Certification revocation and suspension

#### (a) In general

A certification issued by a State or an accreditation organization for an embryo laboratory shall be revoked or suspended if the State or organization finds, on the basis of inspections and after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing to the owner or operator of the laboratory, that the owner or operator or any employee of the laboratory—

(1) has been guilty of misrepresentation in obtaining the certification,

(2) has failed to comply with any standards under section 263a–2 of this title applicable to the certification, or

(3) has refused a request of the State or accreditation organization for permission to inspect the laboratory, its operations, and records.

#### (b) Effect

If the certification of an embryo laboratory is revoked or suspended, the certification of the laboratory shall continue in effect for 60 days after the laboratory receives notice of the revocation or suspension. If the certification of an embryo laboratory is revoked or suspended, the laboratory may apply for recertification after one year after the date of the revocation or suspension.

(Pub. L. 102–493, §5, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon expiration of 2 years after Oct. 24, 1992, see section 9 of Pub. L. 102–493, set out as a note under section 263a–1 of this title.
§ 255.1 Authority, purpose, scope, and relationship to other authorities. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued by the SEC under section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1851).
( b ) *Purpose.* Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act establishes prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and investments in or relationships with covered funds by certain banking entities, including registered broker-dealers, registered investment advisers, and registered security-based swap dealers, among others identified in section 2(12)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5301(12)(B)). This part implements section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act by defining terms used in the statute and related terms, establishing prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and investments in or relationships with covered funds, and explaining the statute's requirements.
( c ) *Scope.* This part implements section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act with respect to banking entities for which the SEC is the primary financial regulatory agency, as defined in this part, but does not include such entities to the extent they are not within the definition of banking entity in § 255.2(c).
( d ) *Relationship to other authorities.* Except as otherwise provided under section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the prohibitions and restrictions under section 13 of Bank Holding Company Act shall apply to the activities and investments of a banking entity identified in paragraph (c) of this section, even if such activities and investments are authorized for the banking entity under other applicable provisions of law.
( e ) *Preservation of authority.* Nothing in this part limits in any way the authority of the SEC to impose on a banking entity identified in paragraph (c) of this section additional requirements or restrictions with respect to any activity, investment, or relationship covered under section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act or this part, or additional penalties for violation of this part provided under any other applicable provision of law.
[79 FR 5805, Jan. 31, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 35022, July 22, 2019]
#### §§ 270.30b1-1-270.b1-3 [Reserved]
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-15-00619- CV

Ke ith Wiley, App ellant

v. Hocutt, Inc., Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 4-0 0246 5, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Keith Wil ey , acting pro se, filed a notice of appea l attempting to challeng e an orde r g rantingsummary judgme nt ag ainst Hocutt, I nc., one of t he defenda nts in the underlying
cause . Howeve r, that interlocutory judgme nt does not dispose of all parties and cl aim s in the underlying cause and no signe d sever ance order appea rs in the rec ord. Wit hout a final judgme nt or
an otherwise appea lable o rder, we may not exercise appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp ., 39 S.W .3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also Cuarto Petro Corp. v. McG ill Real Estate, LLC , No. 04-06-00788- CV, 2006 Tex. App. L EXI S 11023, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec
. 27, 2006, no pet.) (m em . op.) (dismissing appea l for want of jurisdiction beca

use trial court’s order did not dispose of all cause s of ac t i on and rec ord did not contain orde r of se vera

nce)
.On October 6, 2015, this Court reque sted that Wil ey file a written response

demonstrating this Court’s juris diction over his appea l. No response was filed. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for

want of jurisdiction. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.3(a)
.

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Oc tober 30, 2015

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,378,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,333,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,074,000
<PP&E>                                       7,846,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,823,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          888,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,284,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,823,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               986,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,796,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             264,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,810,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,810,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,810,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.77)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered January 11 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01247

- CR

RUSTY LYLE WHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 78th Di strict Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 59,739

- B



### O RDER

A p pellant , who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child, filed his brief on
January 7, 2019. In the brief, he uses the name of a victim who was a child at the time of t he
offense. Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended
brief that identify any victim either generically (“victim” or “complaining witness”) or by initials
only, including wh en quoting portions of the record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Greg Merkle and the Wichita County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
### §15381. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15381 was editorially reclassified as section 20981 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### §14012. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40506, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1948, which related to a national baseline study and report on campus sexual assault, to be submitted to Congress no later than Sept. 1, 1996, was omitted as obsolete.
Subpart 5345.1 – GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5345 – Government Property

5345.102 Policy

(e) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

(4)(ii)(B) See MP5301.601(a)(i)

(4)(ii)(C)(1)(i) See MP5301.601(a)(i)

(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5345.103 General

5345.103-72 Government Furnished Property Attachments

to Solicitations and Awards

See DAFMAN 23-119, Exchange, Sale, or Temporary Custody of Nonexcess Personal Property.
Power of Attorney


Know all by these presents, that the undersigned (the "Reporting Person")
hereby constitutes and appoints each of Melanie A. DeMorrow, Assistant Vice
President-Shareholder Relations; Richard M. Lavers, Secretary; Joseph P.
Tomczak, Executive Vice President & C.F.O.; Kathy Samovitz, Associate
Counsel; and Jessica L. Long, Assistant Secretary,  signing singly, as the
Reporting Person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the Reporting Person, in the Reporting
Person's capacity as an officer or trustee of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 and such other similar forms as may be
required for filing in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules
thereunder;

(2) do and perform all acts for and on behalf of the Reporting Person
which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such forms
and timely file such forms with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority or other federal
agency; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
to, and in the best interest of, or legally required by, the Reporting
Person.

The Reporting Person hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the Reporting Person
might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or
revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or
such attorney-in-facts substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to
be done by the virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers
herein granted.  The Reporting Person acknowledges that the foregoing
attorneys-in fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the Reporting
Person, are not assuming, nor is the company assuming, any of the Reporting
Persons responsibilities to comply with any of the above specified laws or
regulations.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
Reporting Person is no longer required to file such forms with respect to the
Reporting Person's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the
Company, unless earlier revoked by the Reporting Person in a signed writing
delivered to the Secretary of  the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Reporting Person has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 14th day of June, 2004.



						s/Michael R. Terlep, Jr.
### §§2459b to 2459j. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 2459b, Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §311, formerly §310, as added Pub. L. 98–52, title I, §107, July 15, 1983, 97 Stat. 284; renumbered §311, Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §324(a)(1), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1599, related to misuse of agency name and initials and authority of Attorney General to enjoin such misuse. See section 20141 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 2459c, Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §312, formerly §311, as added Pub. L. 100–147, title I, §117, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 867; renumbered §312, Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §324(a)(1), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1599, related to contracts regarding expendable launch vehicles. See section 20142 of Title 51.

Section 2459d, Pub. L. 102–139, title III, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 771, related to prohibition of grant or contract providing guaranteed customer base for new commercial space hardware or services. See section 30301 of Title 51.

Section 2459e, Pub. L. 102–195, §19, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1615, related to quality assurance personnel. See section 30302 of Title 51.

Section 2459f, Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §313, formerly §312, as added Pub. L. 106–377, §1(a)(1) [title IV, §431], Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A–56; renumbered §313 and amended Pub. L. 108–199, div. G, title IV, §417, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 108–447, div. I, title IV, §417, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3339; Pub. L. 109–155, title II, §201, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2915, related to full cost appropriations account structure. See section 20143 of Title 51.

Section 2459f–1, Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §314, as added Pub. L. 109–155, title I, §104, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2910; amended Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1105(b), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4809, related to prize authority. See section 20144 of Title 51.

Section 2459g, Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §301, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1591; Pub. L. 109–155, title VII, §704, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2936, related to requirement for independent cost analysis. See section 30307 of Title 51.

Section 2459h, Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §304, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1592, related to cost effectiveness calculations. See section 30308(b) of Title 51.

Section 2459i, Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title III, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 520, related to working capital fund. See section 30102 of Title 51.

Section 2459j, Pub. L. 85–568, title III, §315, as added Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title IV, §418, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 525; amended Pub. L. 110–161, div. B, title V, §533(a)–(e), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1931, 1932; Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1117(c), (d), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4814, related to lease of non-excess property. See section 20145 of Title 51.
§ 279.0-1 Availability of forms. ( a ) This part identifies and describes the forms prescribed for use under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
( b ) Any person may obtain a copy of any form prescribed for use in this part by written request to the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Any person may inspect the forms at this address and at the Commission's regional offices. (See § 200.11 of this chapter for the addresses of SEC regional offices.)
[46 FR 17757, Mar. 20, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 26820, June 22, 1982; 59 FR 5946, Feb. 9, 1994; 73 FR 32229, June 5, 2008]
### §274g. Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out this part, there are authorized to be appropriated $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1991, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1992 and 1993.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §378, as added Pub. L. 101–616, title II, §206(a), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3285; amended Pub. L. 105–196, §4(1), July 16, 1998, 112 Stat. 636.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–196 made technical amendment relating to placement of section within part H of this subchapter.
#### Samuel Joseph, Respondent, *v.*Harry Joseph and David Joseph, Appellants.

Appeal from an order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Per Curiam:

The denial in the 1st paragraph of the answer is sufficient to put in issue the agreed price or value of the goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered. It is unnecessary, at present, to review any other question in the case. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
§ 1008.225 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 1008.205(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either— ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Monday, December 6, 2004.

# Place:

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 2005.

# Status:

Open/closed.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 220-2372;                         *jbryson@nw.org.*

# Agenda:

 

I. Call to Order

II. Approval of Minutes: September 20, 2004 Regular Meeting

III. Audit Committee Report

A. Tape Recording of Meetings

IV. Treasurer's Report

V. Establishment of a Committee To Review Fundraising Activities

VI. CEO Management Report

VII. Executive Session (Closed)

a. Corporate Administration Committee Reports

b. Update on COO Search

VIII. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

General Counsel/Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-26678  Filed 11-30-04; 3:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

(LOGO)

1111 Broadway, Suite 2100
Oakland, CA 94607-4036
Telephone (510) 287-2700
Facsimile (510) 835-4888


EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in The Clorox Company
Registration Statements No. 33-4083 on Form S-3, and Nos. 33-41131,
33-41277, 2-88106 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 2), 33-24582, 
33-56565, 33-56563, 333-29375, 333-16969 and 333-44675 on Form S-8 of 
our report dated July 30, 1998 incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Clorox Company for the year ended 
June 30, 1998.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


September 24, 1998
1844.204-70 NASA contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.244–70, Geographic Participation in the Aerospace Program, in all research and development solicitations and contracts of $500,000 or over that will be performed within the United States.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1844.2—Consent to Subcontracts
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Cindy Lea Gimler, Chief Financial Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      1.    The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
            ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
            (15 U.S.C.78m); and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  November 14, 2005

                                                  /s/ Cindy Lea Gimler
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Cindy Lea Gimler
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer