alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

The Honotable Lorenz Walker 

Mayor of Bossier City 

620 Benton Road 

BOS'Sier City, LA 71171 

D~ar Mayor Walker 

Scptcn1ber 5, 2014 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Shreveport Airport 

Authorl:ty for a. grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's SmalJ Community Air 

Service Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficietrcies, particularly issues related to higlrairfares and 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maxirnum of40 grant 

awards each yeat, although no more than four may be to communities in the same State. To 

provide conm1Unities with latitude in d~::veloping solutions to their air service deficiencies. the 

statute provides flexibility in the types of air service development projects that can be funded. 

On June 30. the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 31 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cann:ot comment on the merits of any 

particular proposal. I assure you, however, that the Department will give full and fair 

consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our staf\dard practice, I am placing a copy of your Ieuer and this response in Docket 

DOTkOST~20V~~OI 13 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely, 
LORENZ "Lo" WALKER 

MAYOR 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

®ffic:e of tl:f.e~nr BOSSIER CITY, LOUISIANA 

July 27, 2014 

Secretary, U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

620 BENTON ROAD 

POST OFFICE BOX 633'7 

BOSSIER CITY, LA '71171...5337 

(316) 741-8501 

Thank you for your consideration of the Shreveport Airport Authority's request to expand air service 

through a new route to a hub in the Upper Midwest or East Coast region. 

The creation of this route is essential for the economic vitality of the region served by Shreveport 

Regional Airport. The growing economy of Northwest Louisiana, East Texas and Southwest Arkansas 

depends upon Shreveport Regional Airport to provide airline connections to/from the United States and 

to the world. 

We at Bossier City, along with our business members, would benefit greatly from new routes and more 

air travel options. The Shreveport Regional Airport is an important factor in our city's growth, 

development, and overall health. 

I fully support the Shreveport Airport Authority's efforts to recruit additional air service on a new, 

currently un-served, route. The approval of Shreveport's Small Community Air Service Development 

grant request will help the region in meeting its needs for increased airline service. 

Thank you again for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

c£ Walflwt Lor~ LA 

M~~::wtr'-
No: 15-066 October 21, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Final Environmental Study on 

SHINE Medical Isotope Facility Proposed for Wisconsin

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final environmental impact statement on 

a proposed medical radioisotope production facility to be constructed and operated by SHINE Medical 

Technologies Inc. The report contains the NRC staff’s recommendation that a construction permit be 

issued to SHINE, unless safety issues mandate otherwise.

If approved, the construction permit would give SHINE permission to build a facility for the 

production of molybdenum-99 and other radioisotopes. The facility would be located in Janesville, 

Wis., approximately 40 miles southeast of Madison. If the NRC issues a construction permit, then 

SHINE must submit a separate application for an operating license and must obtain NRC approval 

before it can operate the facility.

The construction permit review process includes examination of the potential environmental 

impacts from construction, operation and decommissioning of the SHINE facility. A separate technical 

(safety) evaluation of the application is underway. The company submitted the application in two parts 

in March and May of 2013. More information on the SHINE application is available on the 

NRC’s website. 

The NRC published a draft environmental impact statement for public comment in May 2015, 

and held public meetings in Janesville to present the draft report and accept public comments. The final 

report, now available on the NRC website, addresses the public comments on the draft.
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2024 Workiva-->
<!--r:1267eeb3-0aa0-46f0-ac20-ca0757c8799a,g:aacd8889-0713-4bec-addc-08d7f5bf422e-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:clx="http://www.clorox.com/20240801" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.clorox.com/20240801">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2023/dei-2023.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="clx-20240801_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="clx-20240801_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="Cover" roleURI="http://www.clorox.com/role/Cover">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
§ 41.48 Undermargined accounts. ( a ) *Failure to satisfy margin call.* If any margin call required by this Regulation (Subpart E, §§ 41.42 through 41.49) is not met in full, the security futures intermediary shall take the deduction required with respect to an undermargined account in computing its net capital under SEC or Commission rules.
( b ) *Accounts that liquidate to a deficit.* If at any time there is a liquidating deficit in an account in which security futures are held, the security futures intermediary shall take steps to liquidate positions in the account promptly and in an orderly manner.
( c ) *Liquidation of undermargined accounts not required.* Notwithstanding § 41.44(a)(1) of this subpart, § 220.4(d) of Regulation T (12 CFR 220.4(d)) respecting liquidation of positions in lieu of deposit shall not apply with respect to security futures carried in a securities account.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4 , 2019 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00100 - CV No. 05 - 19 - 00101 - CV No. 05 - 19 - 00102 - CV IN RE KENTRAIL R. MCCUIN , Relator On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F - 12 - 51308 - L, F - 12 - 51309 - L , and F - 12 - 51310 - L



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Schenck In 2012, rel ator was convicted by a jury of evading arrest or detention, unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, and possession with intent to deliver more than one gram and less than four grams of cocaine in a drug

- free zone while using or exhibiting a deadly we apon. McCuin v. State , Nos. 05

- 12

- 01148

- CR, 05

- 12

- 01149

- CR & 05

- 12

- 01150

- CR, 2013 WL 3929215 (Tex. App.

— Dallas July 26, 2013 , no pet. ) (not designated for publication). The trial court assessed punishment at two years ’ imprisonment in the evading case, fiv e years ’ imprisonment in the firearm case, and twenty years ’ imprisonment in the delivery case, and ordered that the sentences be served consecutively. Id. Th i s Court affirmed his convictions. Id. Relator did not challenge the cumulation order in his appea l. Id. In this original proceeding, relator complains that the consecutive sentences constitute an improper cumulation order . Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to set aside the cumulation order.– 2

–

This proceeding is a collateral att ack on a final conviction and, therefore, falls within the scope of a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07; s ee In re Colbert , No. 05

- 18

- 00340

- CV, 2018 WL 1704149, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Apr. 9, 2018, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.) (court lacked jurisdiction over mandamus proceeding seeking writ directing trial court to vacate cumulation order from final felony conviction); In re Taylo r , No. 12

- 12

- 00240

- CR, 2012 WL 3201959, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Aug. 8, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing original proceeding for want of jurisdiction where relator sought order directing the trial court to vacate cumulation order and reform th e judgment to reflect that sentences are to run concurrently). Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final, post

- conviction felony proceedings. T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 2 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Because the relief sought in relator’ s petition relates to post

- conviction relief from an otherwise final felony convicti on, we are without jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus. In re Colbert , 2018 WL 1704149, at *1 ; see also In re Taylor , 2012 WL 3201959, at *1. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

190100F.P05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
Last updated on Friday, March 07, 2014

http://water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm

Water: Estuaries and Coastal Watersheds

You are here: Water Our Waters Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches Estuaries and Coastal Watersheds NEP Financing Strategies

NEP Financing Strategies

Return to NEP Home/Accomplishments & Results Tab

On average, the National Estuary Programs (NEPs) raise $18 for every $1 provided by EPA. The NEPs successfully leverage federal seed money by:

• Developing finance plans

• Building strategic alliances

• Demonstrating environmental results

• Providing seed money or staff to initiate and develop new funding sources such as stormwater utilities.

Over the 2003-2013 period the NEPs leveraged $4.2 billion from $230 million in EPA grants. This additional funding came from a variety of federal, state, local and private

sources through such mechanisms as annual membership appeals, license plate revenues, fines and penalties, State appropriations and intergovernmental agreements.

There are many sustainable funding examples from the NEPs.

The NEPs use leveraged resources to protect and restore important habitat, support critical land acquisitions, upgrade wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, conduct

outreach and education, and implement other priority actions contained in their Comprehensive Conservation Management Plans.

Note: Leveraged dollars are defined as the dollar value (cash or in-kind equivalent) of resources dedicated to implementing an NEP CCMP above and beyond the funding

provided to the NEP under Section 320, including earmark funding. "Primary” leveraging indicates that the NEP Director and staff, rather than NEP partners, played the central

or leadership role in obtaining the additional resources.

NEP Financing Strategies | Estuaries and Coastal Watersheds | US EPA Page 1 of 2

http://water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm 5/20/2014
NEP Financing Strategies | Estuaries and Coastal Watersheds | US EPA Page 2 of 2

http://water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/fund.cfm 5/20/2014
#### § 239.16 Form S-6, for unit investment trusts registered on Form N-8B-2.

This form may be used for registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of securities of any unit investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 on Form N-8B-2 (§ 274.12 of this chapter).

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form S-6, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1567

___________ Andre R. Crawford, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Gramex Corporation; Jane Gaitsch; * John Nahm; Paul Deli, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 2, 2000 Filed: March 6, 2000

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Andre R. Crawford raises a variety of contentions related to the district court's dismissal of Crawford's employment-related lawsuit for failure to state a claim. Having reviewedthe record in the context of Crawford's contentions, we conclude that no error of law appears in the district court's rulings and that an extended discussion is unnecessary. We decline to consider the arguments Crawford raises for the first time in his reply brief. Having carefully considered all of Crawford's arguments that are properly before the court, we affirm the district court's rulings. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.3b-2 Definition of “officer”.

The term *officer* means a president, vice president, secretary, treasury or principal financial officer, comptroller or principal accounting officer, and any person routinely performing corresponding functions with respect to any organization whether incorporated or unincorporated.

[47 FR 11464, Mar. 16, 1982; 47 FR 11819, Mar. 19, 1982]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 3, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Bancshares of Florida, Inc., Naples, Florida; to acquire Horizon 
Financial Corp., Pembroke Pines, Florida, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Horizon Bank, FSB, Pembroke Pines, Florida, and thereby engage 
in operating a savings and loans association, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 3, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.04-2662 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
731.775 Conference approval requirements.       USAID's policies regarding conference approval requirements are set forth in (48 CFR) AIDAR 731.205–43. These policies are also applicable to contracts with nonprofit organizations.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 731.7—Contracts With Nonprofit Organizations
#### § 232.14 Paper filings not accepted without exemption.

The Commission will not accept in paper format any filing required to be submitted electronically under Rules 100 and 101 of Regulation S-T (§§ 232.100 and 232.101 respectively), unless the filing satisfies the requirements for a temporary or continuing hardship exemption under Rule 201 or 202 of Regulation S-T (§§ 232.201 or 232.202 respectively).

[62 FR 58649, Oct. 30, 1997]
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2011filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:November 1, 2011By/s/ Thomas F. MotamedThomas F. MotamedChief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 12.2 Claimants denied access to employees.

Persons claiming to be creditors or collectors of debts or claims will be denied access to employees for the purpose of presenting or collecting claims during the hours set apart for the transaction of public business or while the employees concerned are on duty.

(Sec. 4, 63 Stat. 111, as amended; 22 U.S.C. 2658)

[22 FR 10789, Dec. 27, 1957]
#### Caroline Wilks, as Administratrix, etc., of Joseph Wilks, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York Telephone Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. AU concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On October 22, 2004, the FAA published a Notice of Availability and Request for Comment on a Draft Supplemental EA for the EKAD Launch Site Operator License for the Mojave                               ( print page 72252)                            Airport, California in the                         **Federal Register**                         (69 FR 62113). The FAA has decided to cancel the preparation of the Final Supplemental EA. The Notice of Availability and Request for Comment is hereby rescinded.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions may be directed to Doug Graham, FAA Environmental Specialist, c/o ICF Consulting, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031 or (202) 267-8568. 

*Date Issued:*                             December 6, 2004.                        

*Place Issued:*                             Washington, DC.                         

Herbert Bachner, 

Manager, Space Systems Development Division. 

[FR Doc. 04-27219 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P