alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1004.6 Procedures for closing meetings. ( a ) The closing of a meeting or a portion of a meeting shall occur only when: ( 1 ) A majority of the membership of the IAF Board votes to take such action. That vote shall determine whether or not any portion or portions of a meeting or portions of a series of meetings may be closed to public observation for any of the reasons provided in § 1004.4 and whether or not the public interest nevertheless requires that portion of the meeting or meetings remain open. A single vote may be taken with respect to a series of meetings, a portion or portions of which are proposed to be closed to the public, or with respect to any information concerning such series of meetings, so long as each meeting in such series involves the same particular matters and is scheduled to be held no more than thirty days after the initial meeting in such series. The vote of each Board member participating in such vote shall be recorded and no proxies shall be allowed.
( 2 ) Whenever any person whose interests may be directly affected by a portion of a meeting requests that the IAF close such portion to the public for any of the reasons referred to in § 1004.4 the IAF, upon request of any one of its Board members, shall take a recorded vote, whether to close such portion of the meeting.
( b ) Within one day of any vote taken pursuant to this Section, the IAF shall make publicly available a written copy of such vote reflecting the vote of each member on the question and full written explanation of its action closing the entire or portion of the meeting together with a list of persons expecting to attend the meeting and their affiliation.
( c ) The IAF shall, subject to change, announce the time, place and subject matter of the meeting at least 7 days before the meeting.
( d ) For every closed meeting pursuant to § 1004.4, the General Counsel of the IAF shall publicly certify prior to a Board of Directors' vote on closing the meeting, that, in his or her opinion, the meeting may be closed to the public and shall state each relevant exemptive provision. A copy of such certification, together with a statement from the presiding officer of the meeting setting forth the time and place of the meeting, and the persons present, shall be retained by the IAF.
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 74 FR 40431, Aug. 11, 2009.

§ 248.12 Limits on sharing account number information for marketing purposes. ( a ) *General prohibition on disclosure of account numbers.* You must not, directly or through an affiliate, disclose, other than to a consumer reporting agency, an account number or similar form of access number or access code for a consumer's credit card account, deposit account, or transaction account to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing, or other marketing through electronic mail to the consumer.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply if you disclose an account number or similar form of access number or access code: ( 1 ) To your agent or service provider solely in order to perform marketing for your own products or services, as long as the agent or service provider is not authorized to directly initiate charges to the account; or
( 2 ) To a participant in a private label credit card program or an affinity or similar program where the participants in the program are identified to the customer when the customer enters into the program.
( c ) *Example—Account number.* An account number, or similar form of access number or access code, does not include a number or code in an encrypted form, as long as you do not provide the recipient with a means to decode the number or code.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Database

#  Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Database 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jun, 2019

**Description:**
The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) database is used by Federal agencies to continuously manage an average of 1,000 advisory committees government-wide. This database is also used by the Congress to perform oversight of related Executive Branch programs and by the public, the media, and others, to stay abreast of important developments resulting from advisory committee activities.  Although centrally supported by the General Services Administration's Committee Management Secretariat, the database represents a true shared system wherein each participating agency and individual committee manager has responsibility for providing accurate and timely information that may be used to assure that the system's wide array of users has access to data required by FACA.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    American History & Political Science

**Creator:**    	    U.S General Services Administration

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (3 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://d2d.gsa.gov/report/ogp-federal-advisory-committee-act-faca-data/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facadatabase.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/federal-advisory-committee-act-faca-management-overview/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (3 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### § 1103.101 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
### §2344. Cash sales

All sales shall be for cash, and the buyer shall arrange for the necessary financing, except as provided in subchapter V of this chapter.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 5, §54, 69 Stat. 477.)
#### THE HAMM BREWING CO. v. WIGGAM.

(Opinion filed January 31, 1912.)

On rehearing.

Former opinion, 27 S. D. 613, 132 N. W. 270, affirmed.

*Gaify, Stephens & Puller,*for appellant..

*John A. Holmes,*for respondent.

SMITH, J.

This case is before us on rehearing. The original opinion is reported in 17 S. D. 613, 132 N. W. 270. Upon reargument, and a careful review of the case, we are. inclined to adhere to our former decision.

The judgment and order of the trial court are reversed, and a new trial granted.

CORSON, J., concurs in the result. WHITING and HANEY, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE>
                                                                                          EXHIBIT 11.1

                                   VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                (Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)



<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ending December 31,
                                                               1996            1995             1994      
<S>                                                         <C>             <C>              <C>
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 ASSUMING NO DILUTION:
   Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $   72,701      $   59,838       $   17,282 
   Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements. . . .         (11,327)        (11,818)          (9,490)
   Net income applicable to common stock . . . . . . .      $   61,374      $   48,020       $    7,792 

   Weighted average number of shares of common
     stock outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      43,926,026      43,651,914       43,369,836 

   Earnings per share assuming no dilution . . . . . .      $     1.40      $     1.10       $      .18 

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
     Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $   72,701      $   59,838       $   17,282 
     Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements. . .         (11,327)        (11,818)          (9,490)
     Add:  Reduction of preferred stock dividends
       applicable to the assumed conversion of 
       Convertible Preferred Stock . . . . . . . . . .          10,781          10,781            8,325 
     Net income applicable to common stock
       assuming full dilution. . . . . . . . . . . . .      $   72,155      $   58,801       $   16,117 

     Weighted average number of shares of common
       stock outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      43,926,026      43,651,914       43,369,836 
     Weighted average common stock equivalents
       applicable to stock options . . . . . . . . . .         632,967         413,809           56,926 
     Weighted average shares issuable upon 
       conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock . . .       6,381,798       6,381,798        4,948,079 

     Weighted average shares used for computation. . .      50,940,791      50,447,521       48,374,841 

     Earnings per share assuming full dilution . . . .      $     1.42<F1>  $     1.17<F1>   $      .33<F1>

                        
<FN>
<F1> This calculation is submitted in accordance with paragraph 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K although 
      it is contrary to APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an antidilutive result.
</TABLE>
132 STAT. 5122 PUBLIC LAW 115–384—DEC. 21, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6930: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Dec. 11, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–384 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 Miller 

Street in Plattsburgh, New York, as the ‘‘Ross Bouyea Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ROSS BOUYEA POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 10 Miller Street in Plattsburgh, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Ross Bouyea Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ross Bouyea Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 6930]
§ 1007.3 Applicability. ( a ) These regulations are to be followed when: ( 1 ) The Inter-American Foundation is owed a debt by an individual currently employed by another federal agency;
( 2 ) The Inter-American Foundation is owed a debt by an individual who is a current employee of the Inter-American Foundation; or
( 3 ) The Inter-American Foundation employs an individual who owes a debt to another federal agency.
1816.506-70 NASA contract clause.       Insert the clause at 1852.216–80, Task Ordering Procedure, in solicitations and contracts when an indefinite-delivery, task order contract is contemplated. The clause is applicable to both fixed-price and cost-reimbursement type contracts. The contracting officer shall use the clause with its—          (a) Alternate I, if the cost type, fixed price with prospective price redetermination, or fixed-price incentive contract does not include a NASA Form 533M reporting requirements; or          (b) Alternate II, if a fixed price contract is contemplated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1816.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
DENY and Opinion Filed September 29, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00706-CV 

IN RE L.C. AKA S.R.M., Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-07925Y 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Evans 

Before the Court is relators’ July 29, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. In 

their petition, relators challenge the trial court’s order granting real party in interest’s 

petition for bill of review, which set aside the final order of adoption and reopened 

the case. 

After reviewing relators’ petition, real party’s response, and the mandamus 

record, we conclude that the petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure in multiple respects. To start, the petition is not signed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1 (requiring all filings to be signed); In re Hargesheimer, No. 07-

03-0553-CV, 2004 WL 42261, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Jan. 8, 2004, orig. 
 –2– 

proceeding) (denying mandamus petition because it was unsigned, among other 

reasons). Relators have also failed to file either a reporter’s record from the bill of 

review hearing or a statement that no testimony was taken. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.7(a)(2); In re Daniels, No. 05-20-00501-CV, 2020 WL 2715406, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas May 26, 2020, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus petition for 

relator’s failure to file a reporter’s record or statement that no testimony was taken, 

among other reasons). Further, relators have not supplied a proper copy of the July 

8, 2020 order granting the bill of review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a) 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to 

refiling a petition that satisfies the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. We also lift our stay order issued on August 5, 2020.

200706F.P05 

/David Evans/ 

DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### § 239.25 Form S-4, for the registration of securities issued in business combination transactions.

This form may be used for registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of securities to be issued (a) in a transaction of the type specified in paragraph (a) of Rule 145 (§ 230.145 of this chapter); (b) in a merger in which the applicable state law would not require the solicitation of the votes or consents of all of the security holders of the company being acquired; (c) in an exchange offer for securities of the issuer or another entity; (d) in a public reoffering or resale of any such securities acquired pursuant to this registration statement; or (e) in more than one of the kinds of transactions listed in paragraphs (a) through (d) registered on one registration statement.

[50 FR 19001, May 6, 1985]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form S-4, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
### Part D—Insular Energy
Editorial Note on Part 3
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 89 FR 71806, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 3.45 Restrictions upon activities. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of § 3.46 of this subpart and all of the obligations imposed on such registrants under the Act (in particular, section 14 thereof) and the rules, regulations and orders thereunder, an applicant for registration as an introducing broker who has received written notification that a temporary license has been granted may act in the capacity of a guaranteed introducing broker.
( b ) An applicant for registration as an introducing broker who has received a temporary license may be guaranteed by a futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer other than the futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer which provided the initial guarantee agreement described in § 3.44(a)(1) of this subpart: *Provided,* That, at least 10 days prior to the effective date of the termination of the existing guarantee agreement in accordance with the provisions of § 1.10 (j)(5) of this chapter, or such other period of time as the National Futures Association may allow for good cause shown, the applicant files with the National Futures Association— ( 1 ) Written notice of such termination and
( 2 ) A new guarantee agreement with another futures commission merchant or retail foreign exchange dealer effective the day following the last effective date of the existing guarantee agreement.
[51 FR 45761, Dec. 22, 1986, as amended at 75 FR 55427, Sept. 10, 2010]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DARIN KENDRICK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 208 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1996 and as of March 31,
1997, for the three months in the periods ended March 31, 1996 and March 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         214,279
<SECURITIES>                                    19,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,337
<INVENTORY>                                    153,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,023
<PP&E>                                          86,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 925,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,580
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           986
<OTHER-SE>                                     685,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   925,018
<SALES>                                        187,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,842
<CGS>                                           56,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Theory and modeling ofatmospheric turbulence. Part II, September 1, 1982-August 31, 1983 /**
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:3817
Item Number:830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001101706
 
Parts: 0102
 
February 21, 2020
STYLE:

v.

RE: Case No. 15-0105 DATE

COA #: 12-14-00217-CV TC#: 2013-025

BARBARA GAIL HARRIS

HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD, INDEPENDENT EXECUT

ESTATE OF HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD, DECEASED

TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF HAYDEN R. MA

Today the Supreme Court of Texas denied 

for rehearing of the above-referenced petitio

review.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

TYLER, TX 75702
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Merle Steele, Jr., Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 236]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2] [depraved indifference murder]), assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) and four counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]). Defendant contends that, because the jury found that he intentionally assaulted his grandfather, the jury’s finding that he did not intentionally murder his grandmother and instead acted with a depraved indifference to human life is contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree. It cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded in finding that defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to his grandfather but did not intend to cause his grandmother’s death *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

We also reject defendant’s contention that the jury’s finding that the assault victim sustained a serious physical injury *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [10]; § 120.10 [1]) is contrary to the weight of the evidence. The testimony of the physician who surgically repaired the victim’s ear established that the injury constituted a protracted disfigurement *(see, People v Askerneese,*256 AD2d 34, *affd*93 NY2d 884; *People v Edmonds,*267 AD2d 19, *lv denied*94 NY2d 862).

*933Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant to suppress the oral statement he made in response to the homicide detective’s initial question, “Do you know why you’re here?” In light of the detective’s knowledge of prior conversations between defendant and the arresting officers and the evidence incriminating defendant, we conclude the statement was the product of custodial interrogation that should reasonably have been anticipated to evoke a response *(see, People v Ackerman,*162 AD2d 793, 794; *see generally, Rhode Island v Innis,*446 US 291, 300-302). Because the statement of defendant was made after he had informed the arresting officers that he did not want to speak further with them, the detective’s administration of *Miranda*warnings immediately after the statement was insufficient to attenuate the taint of the improper interrogation *(see, People v English,*73 NY2d 20, 24; *People v Powell,*246 AD2d 366, 370, *appeal dismissed*92 NY2d 886). Thus, the court should have suppressed the oral statement made in response to the detective’s initial question. The error is harmless, however, because the proof of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming and there is “no reasonable possibility that the error might have contributed to defendant’s conviction” *(People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237).

The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.