alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3442.7101 Policy and clause.

(a) It is the policy of the Department that all meetings, conferences, and seminars be accessible to

persons with disabilities.

(b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.242–73 (Accessibility of meetings,

conferences, and seminars to persons with disabilities) in all solicitations and contracts where

conferences are contemplated.

Parent topic: Subpart 3442.71—Accessibility of Meetings, Conferences, and Seminars to Persons

With Disabilities
§ 1006.610 What procedures does the Inter-American Foundation use in suspension and debarment actions? In deciding whether to suspend or debar you, we handle the actions as informally as practicable, consistent with principles of fundamental fairness. ( a ) For suspension actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart G of this part.
( b ) For debarment actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart H of this part.
[LOGO]
                                                   deltathree
                                                   The IP Communications Network


January 24, 2006

Noam Bardin
16 HaBrosh St.
Carmei Yosef, 99797
Israel

On behalf of deltathree, Inc. and its Board of Directors (the "Board"), I am
pleased to offer you a consulting assignment with our company in accordance with
the following terms and conditions. This offer is being extended to you based on
the fact that all of the members of the Board (excluding you) unanimously
believe, and are of the opinion, that your service as a consultant to deltathree
would not interfere with your exercise of independent judgment in carrying out
your current responsibilities as member and Chair of the Board.

As a consultant, it is anticipated that you will provide consulting services to
the company, subject to the company's needs. You will be an independent
contractor and as such, you are not an employee of deltathree.

We currently anticipate that the term of this consulting assignment will be for
a duration of approximately 6 months, to commence from the date of this letter.
The term may be extended as mutually determined between you and the company.

You will be entitled to receive a gross payment of US $100 per hour with a
maximum of US$ 750 per day for any specific day, and a maximum aggregate gross
payment of US$59,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months. This
payment is inclusive of any applicable taxes, and you are responsible for the
proper payment of any such taxes. Payment will be made in monthly payments, on
deltathree's monthly payment dates on invoices that are properly submitted to
deltathree's Accounts Payable group. In addition to this payment, you will be
entitled to receive customary reimbursement for work-related travel, including
the payment of per diem expenses (for reasonable miscellaneous assignment
related expenses), in accordance with deltathree's current travel reimbursement
policy.

Except as specifically described above, you are not entitled to any other
compensation, benefits or other remuneration. It is mutually agreed and
understood that as an independent contractor you are responsible for your own
health insurance and any other benefits.

Either party has the right to cancel this consulting assignment for any reason
at any time upon notice, provided that work completed up until that time is paid
to you.


<PAGE>

Please acknowledge your acceptance of this offer of consultancy by signing in
the space provided below.

Sincerely,

deltathree, Inc.

/s/ Shimmy Zimels
-------------------------------
Shimmy Zimels
Chief Executive Officer and
Member of Board of Directors



Agreed to and accepted:

/s/ Noam Bardin                                           Date: January 24, 2006
-------------------------------
Noam Bardin
PGI 203.806 Prohibition on persons

convicted of fraud or other defense-contractrelated felonies.

(a) Report violations or potential violations of the Lobbying Disclosure Act (31 U.S.C. 1352) through

agency channels to the Deputy Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (Contracting

Policy) via email at osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.

(b) The OUSD(A&S) memorandum dated March 5, 2012, Department of Defense Inspector General

(DODIG) Report 2012-030, Contractor Compliance Varies with Classification of Lobbying Costs and

Reporting of Lobbying Activities (Project No. D2010-DOOOCF-0145.000) is available here .

Parent topic: PGI 203.8 - LIMITATIONS ON THE PAYMENT OF FUNDS TO INFLUENCE FEDERAL

TRANSACTIONS
§ 1006.750 What does the suspending official consider in deciding whether to continue or terminate my suspension? ( a ) The suspending official bases the decision on all information contained in the official record. The record includes— ( 1 ) All information in support of the suspending official's initial decision to suspend you;
( 2 ) Any further information and argument presented in support of, or opposition to, the suspension; and
( 3 ) Any transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings.
( b ) The suspending official may refer disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact. The suspending official may reject any resulting findings, in whole or in part, only after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous.
132 STAT. 5348 PUBLIC LAW 115–403—DEC. 31, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 7: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 20, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–403 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 51, United States Code, to extend the authority of the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration to enter into leases of non-excess property 

of the Administration. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NASA Enhanced Use Leasing 

Extension Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LEASES OF NONEXCESS PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION. 

Section 20145(g) of title 51, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2019’’. 

Approved December 31, 2018. 

NASA Enhanced 

Use Leasing 

Extension Act 

of 2018. 

51 USC 10101 

note. 

Dec. 31, 2018 

[S. 7] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 5.17 Authorization to trade. No retail foreign exchange dealer, futures commission merchant, introducing broker or any of their associated persons may directly or indirectly effect a retail forex transaction for the account of any customer unless before the transaction the customer, or person designated by the customer to control the account specifically authorized the retail foreign exchange dealer, futures commission merchant, introducing broker or any of their associated persons to effect the transaction. A transaction is “specifically authorized” if the customer or person designated by the customer to control the account specifies: ( a ) The precise retail forex transaction to be effected;
( b ) The exact amount of the foreign currency to be purchased or sold; and
( c ) In the case of an option, the identity of the foreign currency or contract that underlies the option.
No: 16-064 November 15, 2016

Contact: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Its Environmental Study of 

Proposed Medical Radioisotope Production Facility in Columbia, Mo.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on its draft environmental 

impact study of a medical radioisotope production facility proposed for Columbia, Mo. The study 

recommends a construction permit be issued to Northwest Medical Isotopes LLC, barring any safety 

issues identified in the agency’s ongoing technical review of the application.

NRC staff will hold a public meeting Dec. 6 from 6-8 p.m. at the Holiday Inn Columbia-East, 

915 Port Way, in Columbia, to present the draft study’s findings and receive public comment. Agency 

staff members will be on hand one hour before the meeting for informal discussions with members of 

the public.

Northwest submitted the application in February 2015, proposing to construct a facility to 

produce molybdenum-99 from low-enriched uranium. Molybdenum-99 decays to technetium-99m, the 

most commonly used radioisotope in medicine. Technetium-99m is used in 20 million to 25 million 

diagnostic procedures around the world each year, such as bone and organ scans to detect cancer, and 

cardiovascular imaging. There are currently no molybdenum-99 production facilities in the United 

States, though the NRC has issued a construction authorization to SHINE Medical Technologies to 

build one in Janesville, Wis. 

The draft environmental impact statement (NUREG-2209) documents the NRC staff’s 

environmental review of Northwest’s construction authorization application. It examines the 

environmental impacts of construction, operation and decommissioning of the proposed facility, as well 

as the transportation and irradiation of uranium targets at research reactors. It concludes the

environmental impacts would be small and therefore not be significant enough to deny the construction 

permit.

Comments on the draft environmental impact statement may be submitted in person at the 

Dec. 6 public meeting or in writing online at www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2013-0235. 

Comments will be accepted through Dec. 29. More information on the public meeting and how to 

submit comments was published in the Federal Register on Nov. 9.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ULYSSES PEARCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2511

[October 29, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Elizabeth Scherer and Timothy Bailey, Judges; L.T. Case 

No. 17-003716-CF-10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §16081. Fuel cell transit bus demonstration

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall establish a transit bus demonstration program to make competitive, merit-based awards for 5-year projects to demonstrate not more than 25 fuel cell transit buses (and necessary infrastructure) in 5 geographically dispersed localities.

#### (b) Preference

In selecting projects under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to projects that are most likely to mitigate congestion and improve air quality.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VII, §731, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 821.)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. Inthe Matter ofWoolpertLLC 2013EA250068 Judge NotAssigned
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows: Daniel Kohlmeyer Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Telephone: 718 553-3266 Facsimile: 718 995-5699 Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel
By: Daniel Kohlmeyer Attorney 

# RECEI\/ED MAR 2 32015 HEARING DOCKET

Dated: 

# :3/!.!y'}.>- 7 7CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested addressed as follows: Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation LawFirm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 2140I Telefax: (866) 568-9886 Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000

**~IF** FILINGBYFEDERAL EXPRESS Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building

- Room 20 14 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

Date:
__ 

### ~_1A_R_1_7_zo_15
__ L aHooks J1araiegal Specialist Office ofRegional Counsel I AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434

2
§ 1006.420 May I approve a transaction with an excluded or disqualified person at a lower tier? If a transaction at a lower tier is subject to your approval, you as an agency official may not approve— ( a ) A covered transaction with a person who is currently excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 1006.120; or
( b ) A transaction with a person who is disqualified from that transaction, unless you obtain a waiver or exception under the statute, Executive order, or regulation that is the basis for the person's disqualification.
### §§1962d–12 to 1962d–14. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–58, title I, §104(g)(3), Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 560

Section 1962d–12, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 682, §1, 69 Stat. 618, authorized Secretary of the Interior to make investigations of projects for conservation, development, and utilization of Alaskan water resources and to report findings, with recommendations, to President and Congress.

Section 1962d–13, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 682, §2, 69 Stat. 618, directed Secretary of the Interior, prior to transmission of report on Alaskan water resource projects to Congress, to transmit copies thereof for information and comment to Governor of Alaska and to heads of interested Federal departments and agencies, and to include copies of views of such officials along with transmission of Secretary's report to Congress.

Section 1962d–14, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 682, §3, 69 Stat. 618, authorized to be appropriated not more than $250,000 in any one fiscal year for Alaskan water resources investigation.
#### Prudential Exporters Corporation, Appellant, v. Svirsky Clothing Company, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 777.]
### §283q. Eureka prize competitions

#### (a) In general

Pursuant to the authorities and processes established under section 3719 of title 15, the Director of the National Institutes of Health shall support prize competitions for one or both of the following goals:

(1) Identifying and funding areas of biomedical science that could realize significant advancements through a prize competition.

(2) Improving health outcomes, particularly with respect to human diseases and conditions—

(A) for which public and private investment in research is disproportionately small relative to Federal Government expenditures on prevention and treatment activities with respect to such diseases and conditions, such that Federal expenditures on health programs would be reduced;

(B) that are serious and represent a significant disease burden in the United States; or

(C) for which there is potential for significant return on investment to the United States.

#### (b) Tracking; reporting

The Director of the National Institutes of Health shall—

(1) collect information on—

(A) the effect of innovations funded through the prize competitions under this section in advancing biomedical science or improving health outcomes pursuant to subsection (a); and

(B) the effect of the innovations on Federal expenditures; and

(2) include the information collected under paragraph (1) in the triennial report under section 283 of this title (as amended by section 2032).

(Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title II, §2002, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1047.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2032, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), means section 2032 of Pub. L. 114–255.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 1006.105 Does this part apply to me? Portions of this part (see table at § 1006.25(b)) apply to you if you are a(n)— ( a ) Person who has been, is, or may reasonably be expected to be, a participant or principal in a covered transaction;
( b ) Respondent (a person against whom the Inter-American Foundation has initiated a debarment or suspension action);
( c ) Inter-American Foundation debarring or suspending official; or
( d ) Inter-American Foundation official who is authorized to enter into covered transactions with non-Federal parties.
§ 401.4 Exemption for financial institutions engaged in limited government securities dealer activities. ( a ) Subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, a financial institution shall be exempt from the provisions of sections 15C (a), (b), and (d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-5 (a), (b), (d)) and the regulations of this subchapter if its government securities dealer activities are limited to one or more of the following activities: ( 1 ) Sales or purchases in a fiduciary capacity;
( 2 ) The sale and subsequent repurchase and the purchase and subsequent resale of government securities pursuant to a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement; and
( 3 ) Such other activities as have been exempted by regulation under this subchapter.
( b ) ( 1 ) A financial institution that relies on the exemption contained in paragraph (a) of this section is required to comply with: ( i ) The regulations of part 450 of this chapter concerning custodial holdings of government securities for customers; and
( ii ) Section 403.5(d) of this chapter concerning certain repurchase transactions with customers.
( 2 ) A branch or agency of a foreign bank that relies on the exemption contained in paragraph (a) of this section is in addition required to comply with § 403.5(e) of this chapter.
( c ) For the purposes of this section “financial institution” includes an insured credit union, as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1752(7).
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 74 FR 40431, Aug. 11, 2009.

§ 248.17 Relation to State laws. ( a ) *In general.* This subpart shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any statute, regulation, order, or interpretation in effect in any State, except to the extent that such State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.
( b ) *Greater protection under State law.* For purposes of this section, a State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart if the protection such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided under this subpart, as determined by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, after consultation with the Commission, on theConsumer Financial Protection Bureau's own motion, or upon the petition of any interested party.
[65 FR 40362, June 29, 2000, as amended at 89 FR 47786, June 3, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                        64,681
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                340,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,193
<INVENTORY>                                  140,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             621,543
<PP&E>                                     2,682,694
<DEPRECIATION>                               622,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,861,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        468,282
<BONDS>                                    1,035,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          6,900
<PREFERRED>                                    3,450
<COMMON>                                      43,739
<OTHER-SE>                                   977,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,861,880
<SALES>                                    3,197,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,197,872
<CGS>                                      3,009,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,009,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           101,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               95,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                  35,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           59,838
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  59,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0

        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]               
[Page 65395]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-133]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7213]

 
Notice Convening an Accountability Review Board To Examine the 
Circumstances of the Death of Three DoD Personnel Assigned to the U.S. 
Embassy's Office of Defense Representative Pakistan (ODRP) on February 
3, 2010

    Pursuant to Section 301 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and 
Antiterrorism Act of 1986, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4831 et seq.), the 
Secretary of State has determined that a recent attack on three 
Department of Defense personnel assigned to the U.S. Embassy's Office 
of Defense Representative Pakistan (ODRP) involved loss of life that 
was at or related to a U.S. mission abroad. Therefore, the Secretary 
has convened an Accountability Review Board to examine the facts and 
the circumstances of the attacks and to report to me such findings and 
recommendations as it deems appropriate.
    The Secretary has appointed Joseph Lake, a retired U.S. ambassador, 
as Chair of the Board. He will be assisted by Robert Bryson, Lewis 
Atherton, Barbara Martin, Wayne Rychak and by the Executive Secretary 
to the Board, Linda Hartley. They bring to their deliberations 
distinguished backgrounds in government service and/or the private 
sector.
    The Board will submit its conclusions and recommendations to 
Secretary Clinton within 60 days of its first meeting, unless the Chair 
determines a need for additional time. Appropriate action will be taken 
and reports submitted to Congress on any recommendations made by the 
Board.
    Anyone with information relevant to the Board's examination of 
these incidents should contact the Board promptly at (202) 647-5204 or 
send a fax to the Board at (202) 647-3282.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 8, 2010.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-26791 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
```
#### § 1006.325 What happens if I do business with an excluded person in a covered transaction?

If as a participant you knowingly do business with an excluded person, we may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend you, or take other remedies as appropriate.