Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices 46439 

and will use electronic document 

receiving systems that meet the 

applicable subpart D requirements. 

On August 19, 2013, the California 

State Water Resources Control Board 

(CA SWRCB) submitted an application 

titled ‘‘Storm Water Multiple 

Application and Report System’’ for 

revision/modification of its EPAauthorized authorized Part 123 program 

under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed CA 

SWRCB’s request to revise its EPAauthorized Part 123—EPA Administered 

Permit Programs: The National Pollutant 

Discharge Elimination System program 

and, based on this review, EPA 

determined that the application met the 

standards for approval of authorized 

program revision/modification set out in 

40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance 

with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of 

EPA’s decision to approve California’s 

request to revise its Part 123—EPA 

Administered Permit Programs: The 

National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System program to allow 

electronic reporting under 40 CFR part 

122 is being published in the Federal 

Register. 

CA SWRCB was notified of EPA’s 

determination to approve its application 

with respect to the authorized program 

listed above. 

Dated: July 30, 2014. 

Matthew Leopard, 

Acting Director, Office of Information 

Collection. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18816 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–9016–3] 

Environmental Impact Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements, 

Filed 07/28/2014 Through 08/01/2014 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air 

Act requires that EPA make public its 

comments on EISs issued by other 

Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters 

on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.

gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. 

EIS No. 20140210, Draft EIS, NPS, NY, 

Fire Island National Seashore Draft 

White-tailed Deer Management Plan, 

Comment Period Ends: 10/10/2014, 

Contact: Morgan Elmer 303–969–2317 

EIS No. 20140211, Final EIS, FHWA, 

OR, US 97 Bend North Corridor 

Project, Review Period Ends: 09/08/

2014, Contact: Michelle Eraut 503– 

316–2559 

EIS No. 20140212, Draft EIS, FERC, PA, 

Multi-Project for Hydropower 

Licenses, Susquehanna River 

Hydroelectric Projects, Comment 

Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: 

Emily Carter 202–502–6512 

EIS No. 20140213, Draft EIS, FHWA, AL, 

I–10 Mobile River Bridge and Bayway 

Widening Project No. DPI–0030(005), 

Comment Period Ends: 11/07/2014, 

Contact: Mr. Mark D. Bartlett 334– 

274–6350 

EIS No. 20140214, Final EIS, AFS, OR, 

Eden Ridge Timber Sales, Review 

Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: 

Holly Witt 541–247–3688 

EIS No. 20140215, Final EIS, USACE, 

FL, Central Everglades Planning 

Project, Review Period Ends: 09/08/

2014, Contact: Dr. Gretchen Ehlinger 

904–232–1682 

EIS No. 20140216, Second Final EIS, 

AFS, MT, East Reservoir, Review 

Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: 

Denise Beck 406–293–7773 x7504 

EIS No. 20140217, Draft Supplement, 

NNSA, TN, Production of Tritium in 

a Commercial Light Water Reactor, 

Comment Period Ends: Contact: Curtis 

Chambellan 505–845–5073 

EIS No. 20140218, Final EIS, APHIS, 00, 

Determinations of Nonregulated 

Status for 2, 4–D-Resistant Corn and 

Soybean Varieties, Review Period 

Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Sid Abel 

301–851–3896 

EIS No. 20140219, Final EIS, USACE, 

NC, NC–1409 (Military Cutoff Road) 

Extension and Proposed US 17 

Homestead Bypass, Review Period 

Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Brad 

Shaver 910–251–4611 

Dated: August 5, 2014. 

Dawn Roberts, 

Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance 

Division, Office of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18820 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL 9914–89–OGC] 

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air 

Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent 

decree; request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby 

given of a proposed consent decree to 

address a lawsuit filed by the Sierra 

Club in the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of California: 

Sierra Club v. McCarthy, Civil Action 

No. 3:14–cv–00964–JD (N.D. Cal.). On 

March 3, 2014, Plaintiff filed a 

complaint which alleged that Gina 

McCarthy, in her official capacity as 

Administrator of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform a mandatory 

duty to find that certain states failed to 

submit state implementation plans 

(‘‘SIPs’’) for named areas to address 

certain prevention of significant 

deterioration (‘‘PSD’’) program 

requirements for fine particulate matter, 

or PM2.5. The proposed consent decree 

would establish deadlines for EPA to 

take some of these actions. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed consent decree must be 

received by September 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2014–0585, online at 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by email to oei.docket@

epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

or by hand delivery or courier to EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 

4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. Comments on 

a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted 

in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use 

of special characters and any form of 

encryption, and may be mailed to the 

mailing address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Hogan, Air and Radiation 

Law Office (2344A), Office of General 

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 

564–3244; fax number: (202) 564–5603; 

email address: hogan.stephanie@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club 

seeking to compel the Administrator to 

take actions under CAA sections 110(k). 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, EPA would agree to sign 

a notice or notices by no later than 

August 15, 2014, finding that the States 

of Vermont, Wisconsin, and California 

(as to the North Coast Management 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

46440 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices 

District) failed to submit SIP revisions 

addressing the PM2.5 PSD increments 

and implementing regulations required 

by the final rule, ‘‘Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) for 

Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 

Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments, 

Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and 

Significant Monitoring Concentration 

(SMC),’’ 75 FR 64,864 (Oct. 20, 2010). 

The proposed consent decree also 

provides that if any of these States 

makes a complete submission 

addressing the requirements prior to 

August 15, 2014, then EPA’s obligation 

to take the required action is 

automatically terminated. 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, EPA will deliver notice 

of each action to the Office of the 

Federal Register for review and 

publication within 15 days of signature. 

In addition, the proposed consent 

decree outlines the procedure for the 

Plaintiff to request costs of litigation, 

including attorney fees. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who are 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the consent decree will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

A. How can I get a copy of the consent 

decree? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by: EPA–HQ–OGC– 

2014–0585) contains a copy of the 

proposed consent decree. The official 

public docket is available for public 

viewing at the Office of Environmental 

Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through 

www.regulations.gov. You may use 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at www.regulations.gov 

without change, unless the comment 

contains copyrighted material, 

confidential business information (CBI), 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web 

site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address is automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the official public 

docket, and made available in EPA’s 

electronic public docket. 

Dated: July 31, 2014. 

Patricia Embrey, 

Acting Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18828 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9915–01-Region-4; CERCLA–04– 

2014–3764] 

J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund 

Site; Sun City, Hillsborough County, 

Florida; Notice of Settlement 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of settlement. 

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency has 

entered into a settlement with Pamela S. 

Ahlen, J.J. Seifert Land Company and J.J. 

Seifert Machine Co., Inc. concerning the 

J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund Site 

located in Sun City, Hillsborough 

County, Florida. The settlement is based 

on a financial analysis and addresses 

liability for past and future costs 

concerning work being performed at the 

Site and allows for the sale of the 

property. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until 

September 8, 2014. The Agency will 

consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the settlement if comments received 

disclose facts or considerations which 

indicate that the amended settlement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES