alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.6 Penalties. ( a ) *Civil penalties* — ( 1 ) *Civil penalty for refusal to permit entry or inspection.* Any person that is determined to have willfully failed or refused to permit entry or inspection, or to have willfully disrupted, delayed or otherwise impeded an authorized inspection, as set forth in § 103.5(a), shall pay a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $46,901 for each violation. Each day the violation continues constitutes a separate violation.
( 2 ) *Civil penalty for failure to establish or maintain records.* Any person that is determined to have willfully failed or refused to establish or maintain any record, or to submit any report, notice, or other information required by the CWCIA or the CWCR, or to permit access to or copying of any record exempt from disclosure under the CWCIA or CWCR as set forth in § 103.5(b), shall pay a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $9,380 for each violation.
( b ) *Criminal penalties.* Any person that knowingly violates the CWCIA by willfully failing or refusing to permit entry or inspection; or by disrupting, delaying or otherwise impeding an inspection authorized by the CWCIA; or by willfully failing or refusing to establish or maintain any required record, or to submit any required report, notice, or other information; or by willfully failing or refusing to permit access to or copying of any record exempt from disclosure under the CWCIA or CWCR, shall, in addition to or in lieu of any civil penalty that may be imposed, be fined under Title 18 of the United States Code, or be imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
( c ) *Other remedial action* — ( 1 ) *Injunction.* The United States may, in a civil action, obtain an injunction against: ( i ) The conduct prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 229 or 229C; or
( ii ) The preparation or solicitation to engage in conduct prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 229 or 229D.
( 2 ) In addition, the United States may, in a civil action, restrain any violation of section 306 or section 405 of the CWCIA, or compel the taking of any action required by or under the CWCIA or the Convention.
[64 FR 73813, Dec. 30, 1999, as amended at 81 FR 36793, June 8, 2016; 82 FR 3170, Jan. 11, 2017; 83 FR 237, Jan. 3, 2018; 84 FR 9959, Mar. 19, 2019; 85 FR 2022, Jan. 14, 2020; 86 FR 7806, Feb. 2, 2021; 87 FR 1074, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 1507, Jan. 11, 2023; 89 FR 702, Jan. 5, 2024]
#### § 1005.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
#### Carrie M. Manheimer and Another, Executors, etc., Respondents, v. 1241 Broadway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and answer on payment of costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
§ 120.13 Registration. ( a ) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles, or furnishing defense services, is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls as set forth in part 122 of this subchapter. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in such a business requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing a defense article or furnishing a defense service. A manufacturer who does not engage in exporting must nevertheless register.
( b ) Any U.S. person; foreign person located in the United States; or foreign person located outside the United States that is owned or controlled by a U.S. person, who engages in brokering activities is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls as set forth in part 129 of this subchapter.
( c ) The registration requirements as set forth in parts 122 and 129 of this subchapter include limited exemptions.
[87 FR 16411, Mar. 23, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 12213, Jan. 27, 2023]
### §1862j. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director for carrying out sections 2 through 4 $150,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(Pub. L. 102–476, §5, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2301; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10312(f)(3), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1522.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 2 through 4, referred to in text, is sections 2 to 4 of Pub. L. 102–476, which enacted sections 1862h and 1862i of this title and amended section 1862 of this title, respectively.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–167 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section authorized appropriations for carrying out sections 1862h to 1862j of this title for fiscal years 1992 and 1993.
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.7a-5 Filing of amendments; number of copies.

Except as provided in § 260.7a-6, three copies of every amendment to an application shall be filed with the Commission.

[16 FR 8737, Aug. 29, 1951]
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS OFTEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 7£7JJ 

## PENALTY FOP?, |H£^h3e& 02 ir 

# 2/9/2015 PIRIIVATE USi-,- '< (fi3ijjl!i£& 0005557458 febT3~2015 QMITU Mill 1iaiwi ncunu t r*i. tf +Ws^SMzSP MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701

— 

### SMITH, WILLIAM DENON Tr. Ct. No. 13R12-13530-CR(1) WR-82,855-02 

### On this day, the application for-11 07 WritofHabeas Corpus has been received and presented to the Court. ,*^
- \£v# Abel Acosta, Clerk WILLIAM DENON SMITH )C# 1928399 

# tfh^.
#### Marjorie J. Nichols v. Charles W. Nichols, Jr.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 696.]
### NUMBER 13

- 10

- 00 507

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

MARILYN TINDOL

, Appellant,

v.

GARY PHILLIP TINDOL

, Appellees.

On appeal from the 3 6 th District Court

of Live Oak County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This case is before the Court on appellant’s agreed motion to set aside the trial

court ’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand to the trial court for rendition of

judgment. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the

matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to set2

aside the trial court = s judgment without regards to the merits, and remand this case to the

trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

The joint motion to set aside and remand is GRANTED. Accordingly

, we SET

ASIDE the trial court = s judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties = agreement. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

6 th day of October , 20 11

.
Order entered November 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00202
- CV
JACOB SWEARINGER , ET AL. , Appellant s

V. ABRAHAM EDILBERTO GU AJARDO, Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 03165



### O RDER
We GRANT appellee’s November 24, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellee shall file a brief by DECEMBER 16, 2015 . We caution appellee that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2004 / Presidential Documents 74939

Memorandum of December 8, 2004

Delegation of Certain Reporting Authority 

Memorandum for the Chairperson of the National Endowment for the 

Humanities 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States 

Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions conferred upon the President 

in the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, as 

amended (20 U.S.C. 959(d)) to provide the specified report relating to the 

National Endowment for the Humanities to the Congress. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

[FR Doc. 04–27468

Filed 12–13–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 8, 2004. 

.

W
#### § 37.503 Provide information to the Commission.

A swap execution facility shall provide information in its possession to the Commission upon request, in a form and manner that the Commission approves.
§ 31.20 Prohibition of guarantees against loss. ( a ) No leverage transaction merchant shall in any way represent that it will, with respect to any leverage contract in any account carried by the leverage transaction merchant for or on behalf of any person: ( 1 ) Guarantee such person against loss;
( 2 ) Limit the loss of such person; or
( 3 ) Not call for or attempt to collect initial, minimum or maintenance leverage margin established for customers.
( b ) No person shall in any way represent that a leverage transaction merchant will engage in any of the acts or practices described in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section.
( c ) This section shall not be construed to prevent a leverage transaction merchant from assuming or sharing in the losses resulting from an error or mishandling of an order.
( d ) This section shall not affect any guarantee entered into prior to the effective date of this section, but this section shall apply to any extension, modification or renewal thereof entered into after such date.
[49 FR 5540, Feb. 13, 1984]
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 30 53

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mark E. Cam

pb el l
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ark an sa s Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on ; Gra nt Harri s, Fo rm er Warde n, Ark an sa s Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on ; J oh n Whal en , For m er Warde n, Ark an sa s Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on ; Darry l Go ld en , For m er Dep ut y W ard en , Arka ns as Depa rtment o f Co rrec ti on ; J am es Ban ks , W ard en , Varn er Un it , ADC; Cu rti s M ei zn er, Ass is ta nt W ard en , Varn er Un it , ADC; Ra vo nn a Walke r, Cl as si fic at io n Off ic er, Varn er Un it , ADC; C he ry a Jo ne s, Sg t., Varn er Un it , ADC; Larry May , Chi ef Dep ut y , Arka ns as Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ly 30, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Aug us t 8 , 20 13 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, GRUENDER, andBENTON, Circu itJu dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.In m at e Mark E. Cam pb el l ap pe al s fo ll owi ng th e di st ric t co ur t’s ad ve rs e gr an t 1 of su m m ary jud gm en t in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n. Upo n de no vo rev ie w, se e Ki ng
v. Io wa Dep ’t of Co rr

s. , 59 8 F.3 d 10 51 , 10 52 ( 8t h Ci r. 20 10 ), an d care fu l

co ns id erat io n of Cam

pb el l’s arg um en ts fo r rev ers al , we fin d no ba si s fo r ov erturni ng th e di st ric t co ur

t’ s de te rminatio n that Ca

m pbe ll exha

ust ed hi s ad m in is tra ti ve rem ed ie s
on ly as to hi s fail ur e-t o- pr ot ect cl ai m ag ai ns t Serg ean t Ch eryl Jo ne s, se e id

. at 10 52 (in m at e m

us t co m pl et e ad m in is tra ti ve ex ha us ti o n p r o ces s acco rd in g to ap pl ic ab le pr oc edur al ru le s as pr eco nd it io n to br in gi ng su it in fed eral co ur t). As to th e gr an t of

su m m ary jud gm en t to Jo ne s, we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co ur t th at th ere were no tri al wor th y is su es
. Se e Sc ho el ch v. Mit ch el l , 62 5 F.3 d 10 41 , 10 45 -4 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (rev ie win g de no vo g r a nt of su m m ary jud gm en t, co ns tru in g ev id en ce in li gh t m os t fav or ab le to no nm ov an t an d dr awin g al l reas on ab le inf er en ce s in hi s fav or ; di sc us si ng
r e q u i r e ment s to pr ev ai l on fai lu re-t o- pr ot ect cl ai m ); Ja cks on v. Ever et t , 14 0 F.3 d 11 49 , 11 52 (8t h C ir. 1 99 8) (in ass es si ng pri so n o ffi ci al ’s res po ns e to kn own ris k to in m at e sa fet y , de li be rat e in di ffer en ce is so m et hi ng m or e th an ne gl ig en ce bu t le ss th an actua l i nt en t t o h arm ). The ju dg m en t o f th e d is tri ctco ur t i s af firm ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le J. Leo n Ho lm es , Uni te d Stat es Dis tri ctJu dg e fo r th e Eas te rn 1 Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. -2

-
# Appendix 501A - [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Part 501 - General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation System
#### § 11.40 Senior Foreign Service Officer career candidate appointments. [Reserved]
#### § 104.1 Coordination of implementation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended.

The Director of the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons of the Department of State, who is the Chairperson of the Senior Policy Operating Group of the President's Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, shall call meetings of the Senior Policy Operating Group on a regular basis to coordinate activities of Federal departments and agencies regarding policies (including grants and grant policies) involving the international trafficking in persons and the implementation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended.
PGI 203.806 Prohibition on persons convicted of fraud or other defense-contract-related felonies.       (a) Report violations or potential violations of the Lobbying Disclosure Act (31 U.S.C. 1352) through agency channels to the Deputy Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (Contracting Policy) via email at              osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.          (b) The OUSD(A&S) memorandum dated March 5, 2012, Department of Defense Inspector General (DODIG) Report 2012-030, Contractor Compliance Varies with Classification of Lobbying Costs and Reporting of Lobbying Activities (Project No. D2010-DOOOCF-0145.000) is available here             .   **Parent topic:** PGI 203.8 - LIMITATIONS ON THE PAYMENT OF FUNDS TO INFLUENCE FEDERAL TRANSACTIONS
No. 835.

#### Halliburton et al. *v.*Johnston Formation Testing Corp. et al.

May 3, 1937.

*Messrs. Frederick S. Lyon*and' *Leonard S. Lyon*for petitioners. *Mr. D. A. Simmons*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
14910-13-1')

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fcl1cn,1 Aviation AlItninistratJn 14CFR I'llrt 39 rDo~ket N,o.FAA-2010-0699; 

### Ilirectoratc Identifier 2009-NM-236-ADj Amendment 

# l'o51() ;)..010':1.3 

## ',iJ 39-*****; AD i<*"'*_**_**] I RIN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthillcss Directives; Viki

# Jg Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-7 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT), ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We arc adopting anew ainvorthincss directive (AD) for the products lisle above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Viking Air Limited has completed a system safety review ofthe aircraft fuel system against fuel t~nksafety standards introduced in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manua, through Notice of Proposed Amendmenl (NPA) 2002-043. The identificdln0n-compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to detennine ifmandatory corrective aClionis requir~d.
. The assessment showed tJat supplemental maintenance tasks would be required to prevent potential ignition sources within the fuel system, which could result in afuJl tank explosion. 

## * ** W "th' AD 

# I, h C d' , I care Issllmg IS to reqUIreaclions to correct t eUllsalecan than on tlese products. 

### --7 INITlAlSl"" 

### {,(~ 

## -{Iii

!<O II.' -, lilOl

I<QUJING',","'OL.

INITIALS"J{;

IJATO
#### § 449.5 Form G-405, information required of registered government securities brokers and dealers pursuant to section 15C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and §§ 405.2 and 405.3 of this chapter.

This form is to be used by registered government securities brokers and dealers to make the monthly, quarterly and annual financial reports required by part 405 of this chapter. The form is promulgated by the Department of the Treasury and is available from the SEC and the designated examining authorities.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form G-405, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        (81,318)
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 104,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                   275,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              347,011
<PP&E>                                        603,557
<DEPRECIATION>                               (361,255)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                603,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,784,997
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        5,291
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,188,809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  603,082
<SALES>                                       135,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              135,469
<CGS>                                         143,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 253,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            102,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (363,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (363,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (363,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)




</TABLE>
### §1997d. Prohibition of retaliation

No person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under this subchapter shall be subjected to retaliation in any manner for so reporting.

(Pub. L. 96–247, §6, May 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 352.)
§ 38.850 Core Principle 16. The board of trade shall establish and enforce rules: ( a ) To minimize conflicts of interest in the decision-making process of the contract market; and
( b ) To establish a process for resolving conflicts of interest described in paragraph (a) of this section.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT OSC AR R IC O-ARREOLA, Pe t i tione r-Appe lla

nt, v. SM ITH, W a

rde n; ATTOR

N EY GENER AL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, R e sponde nts-Appe lle e s. No. 17-15826 D.C . No. 3:13-c v-00580-M M D-W GC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da M iranda M . Du, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 10, 2018 * * San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : D.W . NELSON, W . FLETC HER , and B YB EE, C irc uit Judge s . Pe titione r-Appe lla

nt Osc ar R ic o-Arre ola

wa s c onvic t e d in Ne va da sta te c ourt of one c o unt of se xua l a ssa ult of a m inor unde r the a ge of fourte e n. R ic o

# FIL ED OCT 16 2018 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Arre ola

file d a pe tition for writ of ha

be a s c orpus with the

Fe de ra l Distric t C ourt for the D istric t of Ne v a da

a lle ging tha

t the prose c ution’ s use of pe re m ptory strike s a ga inst two Afric an-Am e ric an jurors viola te d his c onstitutiona

l rights under Batson v . K e ntuc k y , 476 U.S. 79 (1986). The distric t c ourt de nie d the pe tition. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 2253, a nd we a ffirm . The Ne va d a

Supre m e C ourt’ s de c i sion wa s not “ c ontra ry to” nor “ an unre a s ona

ble a p plic ation of[] c le arly

e sta b lishe d Fe de ra l la

w, a s de te rm ine d

by the Supre m e C ourt of theUnite d State s .” 28 U.S.C . § 2254(d)(1). Applyi ng F e lk ne r v . J ac k s on , 562 U.S. 594 (2011) (per c uriam ), whic h uphe ld a pe re m ptory strike ba se d on the juror’ s ba c kground in soc ia l work, the Ne va da Supre m e C ourt c ould re a s ona bly c onc lude tha

t the prose c ution ha d provide d a va lid, ra c e -ne utra l re a son for striking both jurors. M ore ove r, the Ne va da Supre m e C ourt did not c ontra ve ne c le arly e sta blishe d Fe de ra l la

w by fa iling to c onduc t a

c om pa rative juror a

na ly sis whe n e va luating thethird prong of Batson . Se eMurray v . Sc hriro , 745 F.3d 984, 1005 (9th C ir. 2014). The Ne va d a

Supre m e C ourt’ s de c i sion wa s a lso ba s e d on a re a s ona ble

“ de te rm ination of thefa c ts in light of the e vide nc e pre se nte d

in the State c ourt proc e e ding.” 28 U.S.C . § 2254(d)(2). It wa s not obje c tive ly unre a sona

ble for the Ne va da Supre m e C ourt to de fe r to a c re dibility

de te rm inat ion by the tria l c ourt. 2Se eFe lk

ne r , 562 U.S. a

t 598. M ore ove r, the c om pa rative juror a

na ly sis pre se nte d by R ic o -Arre ola

to this c ourt doe s not indic ate tha t the tria l c ourt’ s c re dibility de te rm i nation wa s unre a sona ble . Ac c ordingly , the judgm e nt of thedistric t c ourt is AFFIRM E D .

3