alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                                                                       EXHIBIT 11.1 

                    VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                   March 31,
                                                             1997                1996

<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 ASSUMING NO DILUTION:
   Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   15,440          $   19,914 
   Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements and
      redemption premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     (2,766)             (2,841)

   Net income applicable to common stock . . . . . . . . $   12,674          $   17,073 
 
   Weighted average number of shares of common 
      stock outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,411,705          43,748,550 

   Earnings per share assuming no dilution . . . . . . . $      .29          $      .39 

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE 
 ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
   Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   15,440          $   19,914 
   Less:  Preferred stock dividend requirements and 
      redemption premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     (2,766)             (2,841)
   Add:  Reduction of preferred stock dividends 
      applicable to the assumed conversion of
      Convertible Preferred Stock. . . . . . . . . . . .      2,695               2,695 

   Net income applicable to common stock 
      assuming full dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $   15,369          $   19,768 

   Weighted average number of shares of common
      stock outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,411,705          43,748,550 
   Weighted average common stock equivalents 
      applicable to stock options. . . . . . . . . . . .    828,547             438,815 
   Weighted average shares issuable upon conversion
      of Convertible Preferred Stock . . . . . . . . . .  6,381,798           6,381,798 

   Weighted average shares used for computation. . . . . 51,622,050          50,569,163 

   Earnings per share assuming full dilution . . . . . . $      .30<F1>      $      .39<F2>
                          
<FN>
<F1>  This calculation is submitted in accordance with paragraph 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K 
      although it is contrary to APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an antidilutive result.

<F2>  This calculation is submitted in accordance with paragraph 601(b)(11) of Regulation S-K 
      although it is not required by APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less 
      than 3%.
</TABLE>
### §13434. Biofuels user facility

(a) The Secretary shall establish a biofuels user facility to expedite industry adoption of biofuels technologies, including production of alcohol fuels from biomass.

(b) The Secretary, through such universities and colleges as the Secretary determines are qualified, shall establish a program, in accordance with sections 13541 and 13542 of this title, with respect to the production and use of diesel fuels from vegetable oils or animal fats. The program shall investigate—

(1) the economic feasibility of production of oilseed crops for biofuels purposes; and

(2) the establishment of a mobile small-scale oilseed pressing and esterification unit and a stationary small-scale commercial oilseed pressing and esterification unit.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XX, §2024, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3062.)
<PAGE>   1

                                 COMPURAD, INC.

                                   EXHIBIT 99

            CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


The Company wishes to take advantage of the new "safe harbor" provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is filing this cautionary
statement in connection with such safe harbor legislation. The Company's Form
10-KSB, this Form 10-QSB, any other Form 10-QSB, any Form 8-K, or any other
written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company may include
forward looking statements which reflect the Company's current views with
respect to future events and financial performance. The words "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "intends," "forecast," "project," and similar
expressions identify forward looking statements.

The Company cautions investors that any forward looking statements made by or on
behalf of the Company are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These
uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the Risk
Factors discussed in the Company's prospectus, dated August 28, 1996, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Though the Company has attempted to list
comprehensively these important factors, the Company cautions investors that
other factors may in the future prove to be important in affecting the Company's
results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not
possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the
impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or
combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from
forward looking statements. In addition, the results of operations for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full
fiscal year.

Investors are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward
looking statements as they speak only of the Company's views as of the date the
statement was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events, or otherwise.
```

                                                               Exhibit No. Ex-18

                        BAUMANN, RAYMONDO & COMPANY, P.A.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                          405 N. Reo Street, Suite 200
                                 Tampa, FL 33609
                                 (813) 288-8826
                               Fax: (813) 288-8836

November 20, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549

Re:      Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc.
         Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006

Gentlemen:

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006,  Sovereign  Exploration  Associates
International,  Inc.  terminated its election as a Business  Development Company
that it had  previously  made under the  Investment  Company  Act of 1940.  This
termination  resulted  in a change  in  accounting  principles  from  investment
company  accounting  principles,  pursuant  to Article 6 of  Regulation  S-X, to
operating company accounting principles.

Because  the  Company is no longer an  investment  company,  the change is to an
alternative   principle   which  in  our  judgment  is   preferable   under  the
circumstances. We concur with the application of the change.

Sincerely,

\s\ Baumann, Raymondo & Company, P.A.
BAUMANN, RAYMONDO & COMPANY, P.A.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 7, 2016

s1130

Order 

Clerk

December 7, 2016

153956

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153956

COA: 332331

Wayne CC: 13-010968-FH

MARIO SHANTEZ GOSS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the probation revocation and the sentence of the 

Wayne Circuit Court and we REMAND this case to the trial court for a probation 

revocation hearing and possible resentencing. See MCL 771.4. Without holding a 

probation violation hearing as required by MCR 6.445(E), the trial court found that the 

defendant had violated the terms of his probation. And, while the court did not state the 

grounds for such a finding, it was made immediately after having sentenced the defendant 

for his felony murder conviction and associated charges in an unrelated case. However, 

the murder was committed more than eight months before the defendant was placed on 

probation for the crime charged in this case. Because MCL 771.3(1)(a) provides that 

“[d]uring the term of his or her probation, the probationer shall not violate any criminal 

law of this state . . . ,” the defendant could not have violated the terms of his probation for 

having committed an act amounting to a violation of a criminal law that preceded the 

imposition of the order of probation issued in this case.
### §274a. Scientific registry

The Secretary shall, by grant or contract, develop and maintain a scientific registry of the recipients of organ transplants. The registry shall include such information respecting patients and transplant procedures as the Secretary deems necessary to an ongoing evaluation of the scientific and clinical status of organ transplantation. The Secretary shall prepare for inclusion in the report under section 274d of this title an analysis of information derived from the registry.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §373, as added Pub. L. 98–507, title II, §201, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2345; amended Pub. L. 100–607, title IV, §404, Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3116; Pub. L. 101–616, title I, §101(b), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 373 of act July 1, 1944, added by act Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 907, §1, 70 Stat. 960, which related to a Board of Regents of National Library of Medicine, was renumbered section 383 and classified to section 277 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–158, §3(b), Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 879.

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–616 struck out "and bone marrow registry" after "Scientific registry" in section catchline and struck out subsec. (a) designation and subsec. (b) which directed establishment of bone marrow registry and authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1989 and 1990 for such purpose.

1988—Pub. L. 100–607 inserted "and bone marrow registry" in section catchline, designated existing text as subsec. (a), and added subsec. (b).
No: III-16-015 June 14, 2016

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules a Town Hall Meeting June 23

to Discuss Palisades Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a town hall meeting on Thursday, June 23 in 

South Haven, Mich., to discuss the agency’s actions to ensure the safe operation of the Palisades 

Nuclear Plant and the assessment of the plant’s 2015 performance. The facility is operated by Entergy 

Nuclear Operations, Inc., and is located in Covert, about 5 miles south of South Haven. 

The meeting is scheduled for 5-8 p.m. at the Beach Haven Event Center, 10420 M-140, in South 

Haven. The meeting will start with a poster session from 5-6 p.m., followed by a presentation from the 

NRC staff and a town hall-style meeting. Phone lines will be available during the presentation and town 

hall portion for those unable to attend in person. Details are available by calling 630-829-9620.

“This year, our annual assessment meeting is specifically geared to a meaningful dialogue 

between the agency staff and the public. We will provide information and engage members of the 

community on a wide range of NRC’s actions and plant-specific topics we know have been of interest,”

said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “The poster session will enable members of 

the community and NRC subject-area experts to engage one-on-one; the NRC’s presentation will detail

the agency’s activities to ensure plant safety; and the town hall meeting is designed for an open and 

productive conversation between NRC staff and the public.”

The NRC determined that the Palisades facility operated safely in 2015. The plant was under 

increased NRC oversight for the first three quarters of 2015 due to a finding of low-to-moderate safety 

significance for the plant’s failure to accurately calculate radiation doses to workers during an activity 

in 2014. After conducting a follow-up inspection, the NRC concluded that the plant has appropriately 

resolved the issue. As a result, Palisades began to receive the normal level of NRC oversight during the 

last quarter of 2015.

Palisades will continue to receive the NRC’s normal level of oversight during this year.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant, inspection specialists 

from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and specialists from the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, 

Md. Among the areas of performance NRC will inspect this year are radiological safety, spent fuel 

storage, and the plant’s ability to identify and resolve problems.

The annual assessment letter sent from the NRC Region III office to the company and the most 

current performance information are available on the NRC website.
Salvador G. Mora

(Appellant/CrossAppellee) Appellant/s Sylvia Ramon Mora

(Appellee/CrossAppellant)Appellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 27, 2013

N o. 04-12-00638-CV

Salvador G. MORA,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Sylvia Ramon MORA

, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-10478

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED.

Appellant's brief is due on or before July 8, 2013.

mb

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of June, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Frances M. Leone, as Administratrix of the Estate of Gerald R. Leone, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v. South Buffalo Railway Company, Appellant, and Harold Koch et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Young, Young, Koch, Raszman & Everingham, Respondents.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 847.]
From: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 2:40 PM

To: Brian Sims

Cc: Susan Miller; Marinshaw, Richard; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom); Raymond, Gabrielle

Subject: Re: Jenkins Brick and Tile Company‐ 114 letter

Dear Mr. Sims,  

We approve of your request for submittal of the 2007 and 2008 stack test results to fulfill the

requirements of the information request that was sent to you on 11/17/2010.  However, we reserve the

right to require testing for metals and chlorine if we identify any QA issues with the stack test data

provided by Jenkins Brick and Tile or if we receive insufficient data from the rest of the industry.  

Sincerely,  

Jeff Telander  

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243‐02)

RTP, NC  27711

919 ‐ 541‐5427

919 ‐ 541‐5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243‐02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC  27709
### §1973i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973i was editorially reclassified as section 10307 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
In Re:

October 21, 2010

L.A. Reporters

Legal Video & Video Conferencing

5757 West Century Boulevard, 7th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90045

(800) 675-9700

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left.

For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left.

For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher

(www.adobe.com).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

y0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142768 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142768 

 COA: 295920 

Oceana CC: 09-007571-FC 

MARK ANTHONY COULIER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.5a-1 Forms for statements of eligibility and qualification. ( a ) Form T-1 shall be used for statements of eligibility and qualification of corporations designated to act as trustees under trust indentures to be qualified pursuant to section 305 or 307 of the Act.
( b ) Form T-2 shall be used for statements of eligibility and qualification of individuals designated to act as trustees under trust indentures to be qualified pursuant to section 305 or 307 of the Act.
**Exhibit 4.98**
### §2311. Community Disposal Operations Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established as of June 30, 1956, a Community Disposal Operations Fund, and the Commission (or the head of such agency as may be carrying out the sales and financing functions of the Commission pursuant to a delegation by the President under section 2313 of this title) is authorized to credit said fund with all moneys hereafter obtained or now held by it and to account under said fund for all assets and liabilities held or acquired by it in connection with its sales and financing functions under this chapter, and to make temporary advances to such fund, from any other funds available for expenses of operations of such Commission or agency, as may be required to carry out such functions pending the realization of sufficient proceeds under the provisions of this chapter: Provided, That any such advances shall be repaid to the source appropriation or fund, to the extent of any unobligated balances available in the Community Disposal Operations Fund, prior to the close of the fiscal year during which such advances are made.

#### (b) Availability

The Community Disposal Operations Fund shall be available to pay for all necessary costs, expenses (including administrative expenses), losses or obligations incurred in connection with the aforesaid functions, including expenses incident to sale, or other transfer and any financing under section 2362 of this title, indemnities under sections 2363 to 2366 of this title, and expenses authorized by section 2310 of this title, and expenses in connection with the defense and payment of any claims for breaches of warranties and covenants of title of any property disposed of pursuant to this chapter.

#### (c) Liquidating dividends

Any amount in said fund which is determined to be in excess of requirements for the purposes thereof shall be declared and paid as liquidating dividends to the Treasury, not less often than annually.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 11, §117, 69 Stat. 483; July 25, 1956, ch. 731, §4, 70 Stat. 654.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Act July 25, 1956, amended section generally to establish the Community Disposal Operations Fund, to provide for its availability, and to require excess amounts to be paid as liquidating dividends to the Treasury. Former provisions of this section required that the net proceeds derived by the Commission from the disposal of property pursuant to this chapter were to be covered into the Treasury.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
#### § 420.5 Applicability date.

The provisions of this part shall be first applicable beginning March 31, 1997.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131747 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131747 

 COA: 259722 

Isabella CC: 03-001556-FC 

BRANDEN RAYMOND MURDOCK, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
3419.812 Contract administration.

(d) The HCA is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 19.812(d).

Parent topic: Subpart 3419.8—Contracting With the Small Business Administration (the 8(a)

Program)