alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2808 to 2815. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section 2808, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §221, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 696; amended Pub. L. 95–568, §17(a)(6), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2439, set forth general provisions for financial assistance for programs and related activities.

A prior section 221 of Pub. L. 88–452 was classified to section 2831 of this title, prior to the general reorganization of Part D of this subchapter by section 104 of Pub. L. 90–222.

Section 2809, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §222, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 698; amended Pub. L. 90–575, title I, §105(b), Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1019; Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §§103–106, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 828, 829; Pub. L. 92–424, §§8–11, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 690, 691; Pub. L. 93–202, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 838; Pub. L. 93–355, §3(d)(2), July 25, 1974, 88 Stat. 390; Pub. L. 93–644, §5(c), (d)(1), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2294; Pub. L. 94–341, §2(a)(8)–(10), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 95–568, §§5(a)–(f), 17(a)(7), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2426, 2427, 2439, 2440; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695, related to special programs and assistance.

Section 2810, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §223, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 701, related to resident employment.

Section 2811, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §224, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 701, related to neighborhood centers.

Section 2812, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §225, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §104, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 702; amended Pub. L. 92–424, §§12(a), 13, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 692; Pub. L. 93–644, §5(e), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2295; Pub. L. 94–341, §2(a)(11), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 95–568, §§5(g), 17(a)(8), (b), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2427, 2440, 2443, related to allotment of funds and limitations on assistance.

Section 2813, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §226, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §14, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 693; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §5(d)(2), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2295, related to design and planning assistance programs.

Section 2814, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §227, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §14, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 693; amended Pub. L. 94–341, §2(a)(12), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 95–568, §17(a)(9), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2440, set forth provisions respecting national youth sports program.

Section 2815, Pub. L. 88–452, title II, §228, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §14, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 694; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §5(a)(2), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2295, related to consumer action and cooperative programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.
539.001 Applicability.

(a)In accordance with FAR 39.001, this part does not apply to acquisitions of information or

information systems in support of national security systems. Refer to subpart 504.4 for guidance for

any procurements that may involve access to classified information or a classified information

system. See subpart 507.70 for guidance for purchases in support of national security systems

involving weapons systems.

(b)Refer to 504.1370 and 542.302 for additional requirements for individual access management

(i.e., HSPD-12) to GSA Information Systems.

(c)Refer to 511.170 for additional requirements for GSA Information Systems.

Parent topic: Part 539 - Acquisition of Information Technology
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BADI BURGOS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2521

[ February 1, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; J ohn J. Murphy, III

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 9319CF10A.

Bryan D. Savy, West Me lbourne, for appell ant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE

, C ONNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
e 

US. Department of 

TransportotkNi 

Office of fhe Secretary 

of Transportation 

-RTMENTOr 

JiONS »". ~ r n ,' T i 1^» 

:n :i^v - s p 3:01 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. George J. Kessanis 

Regional Manager, USA 

Hellenic Imperial Airways 

10 Oakwood Drive 

Wayne, N.J 07470 

Docket OST-2009-0244 

Dear Mr. Kessanis, 

This letter confirms the oral approval of April 29, 2011, for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. 41504 

and Part 221 of the Department's Economic Regulations, to the extent necessary to permit 

Hellenic Imperial Airways (HT), to advertise and sell air transportation on its authorized service 

without having an effective tariff on file. HT only serves the US-Greece market and is not 

required to file fares under the Department's tariff-filing requirements, and therefore only certain 

general rules are required to be filed. 

We understand that HT has been granted the authority to perform this service by Order 2010-5-6, 

May 5, 2010, and is in the midst of completing its general rules to be filed with the Department. 

HT anticipates that the requested relief will allow time to coordinate with SIT A to file its 

electronic general rules as soon as possible. These general rules will be filed in accordance with 

Part 293 as specified in Part B of Attachment B of the Department's Notice of October 7, 1999, 

Docket OST-97-2050. 

This exemption is effective until May 22, 2011, or until such time as the carrier's tariff is 

approved by the Department, whichever occurs first. 

We find the reasons stated in your application generally conform with the criteria we previously 

have found necessary to approve this type of authorization, and that it is consistent with the 

public interest. 
This action is taken under authority duly assigned by the Department's Regulations, 14 CFR 

385.13. Persons entitled to petition for review of this action under the Department's 

Regulations, 14 CFR 385.30, may file a petition within ten days afi;er the date of this letter. This 

action is effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not stay its 

effectiveness. 

Sincerely, 

CX-4-^A^ M^ /Ca-^'^^ 

t-. Paul L. Gretch 

Director, 

Office of International Aviation
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wesley Johnson, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 800]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered May 27, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of enterprise corruption, conspiracy in the fourth degree, burglary in the third degree (three counts), grand larceny in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that two of his burglary convictions, which were also crimes underlying his enterprise corruption conviction, were based on legally insufficient evidence and were against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. There was extensive evidence that tended to connect defendant to these crimes and fully satisfied the accomplice corroboration requirement *(see*CPL 60.22 [1]; *People v Besser,*96 NY2d 136, 143 [2001]; *People v Breland,*83 NY2d 286, 292-293 [1994]).

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters outside the record concerning counsel’s reasons for declining to make a severance motion *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). There is no reason to believe that a severance motion would have been successful, or that a severance, even if granted, would have affected the outcome of the case.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
### §2278b. Photographing, etc., of Commission installations; penalty

It shall be an offense, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both—

(1) to make any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map or graphical representation, while present on property subject to the jurisdiction, administration or in the custody of the Commission, of any installations or equipment designated by the President as requiring protection against the general dissemination of information relative thereto, in the interest of the common defense and security, without first obtaining the permission of the Commission, and promptly submitting the product obtained to the Commission for inspection or such other action as may be deemed necessary; or

(2) to use or permit the use of an aircraft or any contrivance used, or designed for navigation or flight in air, for the purpose of making a photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map or graphical representation of any installation or equipment designated by the President as provided in the preceding paragraph, unless authorized by the Commission.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §230, as added Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 1015, §6, 70 Stat. 1070; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)
Exhibit 10.1



                  Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


The chairman of our board of directors is paid a fee of $1250.00 per month.

All other non-employee directors are each paid fees of $1050.00 per month.

Attendance  of a Board  Committee  meeting by a  committee  member:
$175.00 per meeting
§ 1015.2 Public inspection. ( a ) The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) will maintain in a public reference room or area the materials relating to the CPSC that are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) and 552(a)(5) to be made available for public inspection in an electronic format. The principal location will be in the Office of the General Counsel, Division of the Secretariat. The address of this office is: Office of the General Counsel, Division of the Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814.
( b ) The CPSC will maintain an electronic reading room on the internet at: *https://www.cpsc.gov* for records that are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to be available by computer telecommunications. Records that the FOIA requires CPSC to make available for public inspection in an electronic format can be accessed through the CPSC's FOIA web page, which is accessible by visiting: *https://www.cpsc.gov .*
( c ) Subject to the requirements of section 6 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), the CPSC will make available for public inspection in an electronic format, copies of all records, regardless of form or format, which: ( 1 ) Have been released to any person under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3);
( 2 ) Because of the nature of their subject matter, the FOIA Office determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records; or
( 3 ) Have been requested three or more times.
[86 FR 7503, Jan. 29, 2021]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Biennial report to Congress onimproving industrial security**
 
2009 | 2011 | 2013 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.2:IN 2/6/
Item Number:0306 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001104420
 
August 19, 2019
### §17353. Duties of Foundation

The Foundation shall—

(1) use the funds authorized by this part to make grants to promote projects outside of the United States that serve as models of how to significantly reduce the emissions of global greenhouse gases through clean and efficient energy technologies, processes, and services;

(2) seek contributions from foreign governments, especially those rich in energy resources such as member countries of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, and private organizations to supplement funds made available under this part;

(3) harness global expertise through collaborative partnerships with foreign governments and domestic and foreign private actors, including nongovernmental organizations and private sector companies, by leveraging public and private capital, technology, expertise, and services towards innovative models that can be instituted to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions;

(4) create a repository of information on best practices and lessons learned on the utilization and implementation of clean and efficient energy technologies and processes to be used for future initiatives to tackle the climate change crisis;

(5) be committed to minimizing administrative costs and to maximizing the availability of funds for grants under this part; and

(6) promote the use of American-made clean and efficient energy technologies, processes, and services by giving preference to entities incorporated in the United States and whose technology will be substantially manufactured in the United States.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title IX, §923, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1735.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Frank M. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ FRANK M.  SEMPLE                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Frank M. Semple                         |
| President & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |
| May 8, 2006                             |

 

----
§ 245.103 Issuer right of recovery; right of action by equity security owner. ( a ) *Recovery of profits.* Section 306(a)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7244(a)(2)) provides that any profit realized by a director or executive officer from any purchase, sale or other acquisition or transfer of any equity security of an issuer in violation of section 306(a)(1) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 7244(a)(1)) will inure to and be recoverable by the issuer, regardless of any intention on the part of the director or executive officer in entering into the transaction.
( b ) *Actions to recover profit.* Section 306(a)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 provides that an action to recover profit may be instituted at law or in equity in any court of competent jurisdiction by the issuer, or by the owner of any equity security of the issuer in the name and on behalf of the issuer if the issuer fails or refuses to bring such action within 60 days after the date of request, or fails diligently to prosecute the action thereafter, except that no such suit may be brought more than two years after the date on which such profit was realized.
( c ) *Measurement of profit.* ( 1 ) In determining the profit recoverable in an action undertaken pursuant to section 306(a)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 from a transaction that involves a purchase, sale or other acquisition or transfer (other than a grant, exercise, conversion or termination of a derivative security) in violation of section 306(a)(1) of that Act of an equity security of an issuer that is registered pursuant to section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78 l (b) or (g)) and listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association, profit (including any loss avoided) may be measured by comparing the difference between the amount paid or received for the equity security on the date of the transaction during the blackout period and the average market price of the equity security calculated over the first three trading days after the ending date of the blackout period.
( 2 ) In determining the profit recoverable in an action undertaken pursuant to section 306(a)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 from a transaction that is not described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, profit (including any loss avoided) may be measured in a manner that is consistent with the objective of identifying the amount of any gain realized or loss avoided by a director or executive officer as a result of a transaction taking place in violation of section 306(a)(1) of that Act during the blackout period as opposed to taking place outside of such blackout period.
( 3 ) The terms of this section do not limit in any respect the authority of the Commission to seek or determine remedies as the result of a transaction taking place in violation of section 306(a)(1) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
### §18325. NASA launch support and infrastructure modernization program

#### (a) In general

The Administrator shall carry out a program the primary purpose of which is to prepare infrastructure at the Kennedy Space Center that is needed to enable processing and launch of the Space Launch System. Vehicle interfaces and other ground processing and payload integration areas should be simplified to minimize overall costs, enhance safety, and complement the purpose of this section.

#### (b) Elements

The program required by this section shall include—

(1) investments to improve civil and national security operations at the Kennedy Space Center, to enhance the overall capabilities of the Center, and to reduce the long term cost of operations and maintenance;

(2) measures to provide multi-vehicle support, improvements in payload processing, and partnering at the Kennedy Space Center; and

(3) such other measures, including investments to improve launch infrastructure at NASA flight facilities scheduled to launch cargo to the ISS under the commercial orbital transportation services program as the Administrator may consider appropriate.

#### (c) Report on NASA launch support and infrastructure modernization program

#### (1) Report required

Not later than 120 days after October 11, 2010, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plan for the implementation of the NASA launch support and infrastructure modernization program.

#### (2) Elements

The report required by this subsection shall include—

(A) a description of the ground infrastructure plan tied to the Space Launch System and potential ground investment activities at other NASA centers related to supporting the development of the Space Launch System;

(B) a description of proposed initiatives intended to be conducted jointly or in cooperation with Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, or other installations or components of the United States Government; and

(C) a description of plans to use funds authorized to be appropriated by this chapter to improve non-NASA facilities, which plans shall include a business plan outlining the nature and scope of investments planned by other parties.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title III, §305, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2817.)
exv10w2



 




Exhibit 10.2


Addendum
to Amended and Restated Participation Agreement




TD Bank 2005 Performance Based Restricted Share Unit Plan



       Year Two Performance
Goals (January 1, 2006 — December 31, 2006)




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Illustrative Number
	Performance Target:	 	Performance Target:	 	 	 	 	 	of Year Two Units
	Percentage Growth in EPS	 	2006 EPS	 	Performance Factor	 	(1)
	4.0%
	 	$	2.58	 	 	 	85	%	 	 	85	 
	4.4%
	 	$	2.59	 	 	 	88	%	 	 	88	 
	4.8%
	 	$	2.60	 	 	 	91	%	 	 	91	 
	5.2%
	 	$	2.61	 	 	 	94	%	 	 	94	 
	5.6%
	 	$	2.62	 	 	 	97	%	 	 	97	 
	6.0% — Performance Target
	 	$	2.63	 	 	 	100	%	 	 	100	 
	6.5%
	 	$	2.64	 	 	 	103	%	 	 	103	 
	6.9%
	 	$	2.65	 	 	 	106	%	 	 	106	 
	7.3%
	 	$	2.66	 	 	 	109	%	 	 	109	 
	7.7%
	 	$	2.67	 	 	 	112	%	 	 	112	 
	8.0%
	 	$	2.68	 	 	 	115	%	 	 	115	 





 
 



(1) Based on an assumed Award of 300 Initial Units, which is for illustrative purposes only


Dated: January 24, 2006.




	 	 	 	 	 
	TD BANKNORTH INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 
	 

	Name: William J. Ryan	 	 
	 

	Title: Chairman, President and	 	 
	 

	          Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	PARTICIPANT	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Name:
### §2186. Commission patent licenses

The Commission shall establish standard specifications upon which it may grant a patent license to use any patent declared to be affected with the public interest pursuant to section 2183(a) of this title. Such a patent license shall not waive any of the other provisions of this chapter.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §156, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 947; amended Pub. L. 96–517, §7(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3027; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–517 substituted "patent declared to be affected" for "patent held by the Commission or declared to be affected".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–517 effective July 1, 1981, but implementing regulations authorized to be issued earlier, see section 8(f) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as a note under section 41 of Title 35, Patents.

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See, also, notes set out under those sections.