alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Open Literature Review Screen

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

Citation: Guasch, H., W. Admiraal, et a1. (2003). "Contrasting effects of organic and

inorganic toxicants on freshwater periphyton." Aquatic Toxicology 64(2): 165-175.

(WltZll,) 4~7..blli'2,)

Date of Screen: 08/24/09

Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study

reported ranges for the a.i. concentrations employed in the study; therefore, the a.i.

exposure concentrations were not defined.

Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, Staff Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.

Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.

111111••11

2087851
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR RICO-ARREOLA, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

NEVADA, 

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 17-15826

D.C. No. 

3:13-cv-00580-MMD-WGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2018** 

San Francisco, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant Oscar Rico-Arreola was convicted in Nevada state

court of one count of sexual assault of a minor under the age of fourteen. RicoFILED

OCT 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Arreola filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Federal District Court for

the District of Nevada alleging that the prosecution’s use of peremptory strikes

against two African-American jurors violated his constitutional rights under Batson

v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). The district court denied the petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision was not “contrary to” nor “an

unreasonable application of[] clearly established Federal law, as determined by the

Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Applying Felkner

v. Jackson, 562 U.S. 594 (2011) (per curiam), which upheld a peremptory strike

based on the juror’s background in social work, the Nevada Supreme Court could

reasonably conclude that the prosecution had provided a valid, race-neutral reason

for striking both jurors. Moreover, the Nevada Supreme Court did not contravene

clearly established Federal law by failing to conduct a comparative juror analysis

when evaluating the third prong of Batson. See Murray v. Schriro, 745 F.3d 984,

1005 (9th Cir. 2014).

The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision was also based on a reasonable

“determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court

proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2). It was not objectively unreasonable for the

Nevada Supreme Court to defer to a credibility determination by the trial court. 

2
See Felkner, 562 U.S. at 598. Moreover, the comparative juror analysis presented

by Rico-Arreola to this court does not indicate that the trial court’s credibility

determination was unreasonable. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

3
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Joseph V. Vittoria, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.       The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
         (15 U.S.C.78m); and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                   November 14, 2006

                                   /s/ Joseph V Vittoria
                                   ---------------------
                                   Name: Joseph V. Vittoria
                                   Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 146.115 Assurance required. ( a ) *General.* Either at the application stage or the award stage, Federal agencies must ensure that applications for Federal financial assistance or awards of Federal financial assistance contain, be accompanied by, or be covered by a specifically identified assurance from the applicant or recipient, satisfactory to the designated agency official, that each education program or activity operated by the applicant or recipient and to which these Title IX regulations apply will be operated in compliance with these Title IX regulations. An assurance of compliance with these Title IX regulations shall not be satisfactory to the designated agency official if the applicant or recipient to whom such assurance applies fails to commit itself to take whatever remedial action is necessary in accordance with § 146.110(a) to eliminate existing discrimination on the basis of sex or to eliminate the effects of past discrimination whether occurring prior to or subsequent to the submission to the designated agency official of such assurance.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide real property or structures thereon, such assurance shall obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used to provide an education program or activity.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases such assurance shall obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The assurances required by paragraph (a) of this section, which may be included as part of a document that addresses other assurances or obligations, shall include that the applicant or recipient will comply with all applicable Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683, 1685-1688).
( 2 ) The designated agency official will specify the extent to which such assurances will be required of the applicant's or recipient's subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, or successors in interest.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 18, 2010 

Order 

 

March 18, 2010 

139396(63) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 139396 

v COA: 281408 

Wayne CC: 06-008543-01 

ROBERTO MARCHELLO DUPREE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellee for extension to 

March 17, 2010 of the time for filing his brief is considered and it is GRANTED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Kenneth Constable, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006 of RedEnvelope, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:November 14, 2006*By: /s/ KENNETH CONSTABLE*
### §257. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIV, §3405(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1221, as amended by Pub. L. 114–198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710

Section, acts July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §341, 58 Stat. 698; May 8, 1954, ch. 195, §3, 68 Stat. 80; July 24, 1956, ch. 676, title III, §302(a), 70 Stat. 622; Pub. L. 89–793, title VI, §601, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1449; 1967 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §401, eff. Nov. 3, 1967 (in part), 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 91–513, title I, §2(a)(1), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1240; Pub. L. 92–255, title IV, §402, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 77; Pub. L. 93–198, title IV, §421, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 789; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §232(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2031; Pub. L. 99–646, §22(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3597; Pub. L. 102–54, §13(q)(1)(B)(i), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 278, related to care and treatment of narcotic addicts.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–198, title I, §110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710, provided that the amendment made by section 110(b) (amending directory language of section 3405(a) of Pub. L. 106–310, which repealed this section) is effective as if included in the enactment of Pub. L. 106–310.
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Description
      of Board Fees

    


    Directors
      receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended, $1,500 for each committee
      meeting attended not on the same day as a Board meeting, $600 for each board
      meeting of the Company’s subsidiary, Finance Maryland, LLC attended, and $250
      for each meeting of First Mariner Bank’s Loan Committee attended, consisting of
      one outside director. The members of the Audit Committee receive $2,500 for
      each
      Audit Committee attended. Directors also receive a yearly grant of stock options
      to purchase 500 shares of common stock and are granted stock options to purchase
      100 shares of common stock for each committee meeting they attend.
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

October 28, 2011

Mr. P.B. Ross

P.O. Box 17 Grant City, MO 64456

Dear Mr. Ross:

This letter is in response to your November 12, 2010, petition for rulemaking to add §§ 121.214 and 121.321 to Title 14, Code of Fede ral Regulations (14 CFR), requiring airplanes with an entry door height less th an 6 feet 1 inch to be equipped with a removable head protection device. This devi ce is to be installed and removed when loading and unloading the airplane.

We use the following criteria to determin e which petitions for rulemaking are of sufficient priority to ini tiate a rulemaking action:

1) the immediacy of the safety concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rulemaking issues;

and 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

Your petition for rulemaking relates to passenger enplani ng and deplaning and would provide no added benefit to safety of flight or passenger safety during flight. Your product can be used by the airlines without regulatory requirements

.

Based on the information above, we have determ ined that you have not raised a safety concern and this is not a regulatory issue.

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuan t to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, your petition for rulemaking is hereby denied.

Accordingly, we will close Docket No. FAA-2010-1176.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
### §18652. Helium conservation program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish a program to reduce the consumption of helium for Department grant recipients and facilities and encourage helium recycling and reuse. The program shall competitively award grants for—

(1) the purchase of equipment to capture, reuse, and recycle helium;

(2) the installation, maintenance, and repair of new and existing helium capture, reuse, and recycling equipment; and

(3) helium alternatives research and development activities.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 2 years after August 9, 2022, and every 3 years thereafter, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report on the purchase of helium as part of research projects and facilities supported by the Department. The report shall include—

(1) the quantity of helium purchased for projects and facilities supported by Department grants;

(2) a cost-analysis for such helium;

(3) to the maximum extent practicable, information on whether such helium was imported from outside the United States, and if available, the country or region of the world from which the helium was imported;

(4) expected or experienced impacts of helium supply shortages or prices on the research projects and facilities supported by the Department; and

(5) recommendations for reducing Department grant recipients' exposure to volatile helium prices and supply shortages.

#### (c) Coordination

In carrying out the program under this section, the Director shall coordinate with the National Science Foundation and other relevant Federal agencies on helium conservation activities.

#### (d) Duration

The program established under this section shall receive support for a period of not more than 5 years, subject to the availability of appropriations.

#### (e) Renewal

Upon expiration of any period of support of the program under this section, the Director may renew support for the program for a period of not more than 5 years.

(Pub. L. 115–246, title III, §314, as added Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title I, §10112(a), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1460.)
P. 1


# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 205 ) OGRC-S000 7 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 205of 259P. 2

.s V CHARLE

S W . STENHOL M mHOrsnuc T TEXAS
COMMITTEES ! AORJCULTU M VCTBUN S AFWUB S CHAIRMA N O P suscowMrrrEJ O N UVSSTOCX . DAIRY , AN Q POULTR Y 

## <Emignfl0 o f tir eHnite H StattB 3tas * o f 5Uprmniaftti.ef

l ffaghingtnn, S<

& 2H51 5 Octobe r 17 , 199 0 

### m_. n 

### 0£ftC-SO00 7 Pteas e Resp c '

WASHmgro

wome n D .122 1 LflhSWeSTH HOUS E OFRC I SuiUXN U WASHINGTON . 0. C JOCt t (202 1 2Z-8G0 S 0
a puTweTomcBj i

P.O . BO X12J 7 STAMfano . T

X79SS 3 ISIS ) 773-3823 P.O . BO X1101 ABOfltt . T

X7960 4 (916 ) 673-7ZZ ) 

### •Ay A' C~ Ai Th e Honorabl e Willia m K . Reill y Administrator , Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 M M " Street , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 0

- NDea r Mr . Reilly : 

## V Pleas e find attache d a cop yo f th e lette r I receive d fro m Mr . Bo b Kimmel , Snyder , Texas , expressin g concern s abou t change s i n th e listin g o f oi l reclamatio n plan t waste . I woul d appreciat e you r revie wo f thi s matter , and wil l welcom e anyinformatio n yo u coul d provid e i n thi s regard . Thankin g yo u i n advance , and wit hkin d regards , I remai n Sincerely , *•'*..
-

CWStja h Enclosur e 

# (ULULZ. Charle s W . StenhoLm Membe r o f Congres s



# w^m 

# (3
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID PAUL NAVARRO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00204-CR

Appeal from

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D03126)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

January 17, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of December, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Santos, Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 516]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered on or about July *8,*1999, unanimously affirmed. ,

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and *agree*with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonffivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the Orders revoking the following licenses are being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License No.
Name/address016071N
Heron International, Inc., 1149 Ellsworth Drive, Pasadena, TX 77506017940F
Kristen Brandimarte dba Emmeli Shipping, 3200 Sunset Avenue, Suite 209, Ocean, NJ 07712016027F
Lion Exhibition Freight, Inc., 1153 Willingham Drive, Atlanta, GA 30349
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 04-26989 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### § 1005.101 Purpose.

This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 74568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, 
Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, January 10, 2005, at 2 p.m., 
Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 297-1604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Monday, January 10, 2005, at 2 p.m., Central time via a telephone 
conference call. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing 
to (414) 297-1623, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop1006MIL, 
310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221 or you can contact 
us at www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not required to be open to 
the public, but because we are always interested in community input, we 
will accept public comments. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-
912-1227 or (414) 297-1604 for dial-in information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 9, 2004.
Bernard Coston,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 04-27368 Filed 12-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P