In all, eighteen (18) tests were performed according to
the 1972 FIP. Of the eighteen tests, six were cold starts
with the bypass open, six were hot starts with the bypass
open and three cold starts, three hot starts with the bypass
closed. .

It was suggested by the manufacturer towards the end
of the test program, to try some emission tests with the
bypass closed. A few were accomplished. (See Table I).

Table III reflects the same testing after engine modifications
were made.

Additionally there were twelve tests run using the
1975 FTP. These tests used a different method to calculate
mass emissions.

First a dilution factor is calculated according to
this equation:

DF = Vt/Ve
Where:
DF = dilution factor
Vt = CVS volume flow rate
Ve = engine volume flow rate
Then:
Ce = Ct-Cb (1 - 3, )
Where:
Ce = corrected concentration of dilute exhaust
Ct = concentration of sample bag

Cb concentration of background dilution air

Then the mass emissions in grams per mile are calculated
from:

Mass = K Cc- Vte

Where:
K = density of pollutant
Vte = volume pumped through CVS during test

- ye


Test #
HC*
co
coz

*
NOx

Test #
HC*

cot. ~

C02
NOx
*GPM

TABLE III

After Engine Modification
1972 Federal Test Procedure
- Power Turbine Bypass Open

Cold Start . Hot Start
12-2236 . , 12-2237 12-2238 12-2243
97 ' 487 71. 93
10.1 eo "9.14 8.58 7.34
1864.0 : 1874.0 1704.0 1462.0

368 3.5 3.3 2.4

Power Turbine Bypass Closed

Cold Start Hot Start

12-2239 . 12-2240 = 12-2241 12-2242 12-2245
23 27 3100 «431 +26
7.9 6.84 7.02 7.50 7.8
1599,0 1547.0 1559.0 1538.0 1454.0.
2.64 2.59. 2.77 2.85 2.8


As a result of our extensive emission testing, an
in depth driveability investigation with the vehicle
was not possible. Limited testing revealed slower than
normal accelerations, limited engine retardation and a
maximum speed of from about 78 mph.

The various methods of testing used provided a good
data base for evaluating test methods and procedures.
The proportional sampler method of collecting emissions
proved to be the most practical for work to be performed
at the New York City ARB.


Of these eighteen 1975 tests, six were cold starts with

the bypass open, six were hot with the bypass open, four
cold with bypass closed and two hot with bypass closed.
This data is summarized in Table II. Additionally Table IV
reflects 1975 FIP after engine modification.

Tne proportional samoler da
7-mode criving cycle was calcula
procedure:

the
following

7
a x concentration X K = pollutant in GPM
Where:
CFM = airflow of the engine in cubic feet/min.

Miles = distance traveled over the cycle in a min.
Concentration = pollutant measured in PPM

16.33 x 1076

K = density factor of % for HC
co =. 32.97 x 10-6
COp = .5186

6

NO, = 54.16 X 107

The proportional sampler sampling method was explored
for two reasons, one, to develop a procedure that could be
adapted to the equipment the New York City ARB had available,
secondly, to compare previous emission data obtained while
testing the Chrysler turbine as reported in SAE report
#680402, "Emissions From A Gas Turbine Automobile" dated
May 20-24, 1968. This data is summarized in Table V.

Conclusions

By positioning of the power turbine bypass in the
closed position it was demonstrated that low hydrocarbon
(HC) emissions are possible with this engine; however,
carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxides (NO,) were not
reduced sufficiently to be able.to meet 1975 or 1976
emission standards.

-5-


TABL

ty

II

1975 Federal Test Procedure
Before Engine Modification

1apo cold BPO hot 2BPC cold BPC hot

5 tests 4 tests 2 tests 1 test
HO GPM , 2.84 3.33 1.23 1.64
cO GPM 9.12 8.56 . 9.67 9.10
co, GPM 1659 1636 1634 1675
NO, GPM 2.97 2.79 : 2.86 3.00

lpypass open
2Bypass closed


EXHAUST EMISSION ANALYSIS
OF THE WILLIAMS RES CH GAS
TURBINE AMC HORNET

May 1972

Leonard D. Verrelli
and
Casimer J. Andary
Test and Evaluation Branch
Environmental Protection Agency

72-27


TABLE V
Proportional Sampler Evaluation
Using 7-mode Cycle (Hot)
_ Bypass Open
Before Engine Modification.
|
Test # HC gpm CO gpm ! C02 gpm NOx gpm
i
12-2188 84 6.34 , 1323.0 2.77
Before Engine Modification

Test # HC gpm CO gpm CO, gpm NOx gpm
12-2251 37 6.71 1567.0 2.64

Chrysler Turbine Data *
HC gpm CO gpm CO2 gpm NOx gpm
+92 7.04 940.0 1.86

*Test data shown was calculated from the results reported in the
SAE report, "Emissions From A Gas Turbine Automobile", #68042,

May 1968.

-~ll-


‘TABLE IV

After Engine Modification
1975 Federal Test Procedure

Power Turbine Bypass Open

Cold Start Hot Start
Test # 1272244 12-2246 12-2250
HCe 62 .74 “472
cot 7643 7.77 6.92
k
C0; - 1443.0 1435.0 1371.0
NOx 2.8 2.0 2.5

Power Turbine Bypass Closed

Cold Start Hot Start

Test # 12-2247 12-2248 12-2249
HC 432 .23 23
cot 6.34. 7.41 6.33.
Con 1385.0 1454.0 1382.0

NOx 2.7 3.07 oT,

_ SGPM

- 10.-


TABLE I

FY72 Federal Test Procedure
Before Engine Modification

13P0 cold BPO. hot 2BPC -cold
5 tests 3 tests 1 test
HC GPM 1.48 1.52 1.26
CO GPM 10.52 “9.42 9.83
CO GPit 1726 1676 1769
NOx GPM 3.16 3.25 3.29

lpypass open

2Bypass closed

BPC hot


cooler starting, which is not true in the closed position.
Steps are being taken to eliminate the bypass system from
future engines. Another method to achieve engine braking
-and cooler starting will be employed. :

The purpose in performing numerous techniques and
test procedures was to try to establish an accepntable

test procedure for gas turbine testing for the New York
City Air Resources Board.

When sampling from low emission high flow vehicles
the hydrocarbons in the dilution air can contribute a
major portion of the total hydrocarbons and the correction
factor as called for in the Federal Register does not

represent a true picture. For the 1972 FTP tests, the
following calculation procedure was used:

Vt_-Ve ) vt

Ve Ve qq)

Ce = (Ct - Cb
Where:
Ce = concentration of undiluted exhaust
Ct = concentration of sample bag
Cb = concentration of background dilution air
Vt = volume flow rate of sample, or total CVS flow
Ve - volume flow rate of engine exhaust

Then the mass (gpm) of each pollutant emitted is calculated
from:

W= K Ce Vet (2)

Where:
K

density of each pollutant
Vei

average volume of engine exhaust per. mile

(1) See emissions results, pagé 2, report 71-30, "Exhaust
Emission Analysis of the Williams Research Gas Turbine
Volkswagen", Leonard D. Verrelli, EPA.

~3-


and proportional sampler tests were conducted. As a
means of cross checks, continuous raw exhaust was’
sampled during some of the aforementioned test procedures.

A 1200 CFM constant volume sampler (CVS) system was
used for the majority of the testing. Because of high
back pressure in the system a minor modification had to
be made to the CVS. The dilution air filters at the CVS
were blocked-off and air from the test cell was drawn
into a plenum collecting the vehicle exhaust. Mixing
occurred at the exit of the vehicle exhaust.

The cold start tests were made on a chassis dynamometer
after the vehicle had been parked in a 68-86° ambient condi-
tion for at least 12 hours. Hot start data was taken after
the vehicle had been brought up to operating temperature.

It was then shut down and restarted according to the FTP
being performed.

The concentrations of pollutants were measured using
both hot and cold flame. ionization detectors (FID), for
unburned hydrocarbon (HC). Non+dispersive infrared (NDIR)
analyzers were used for carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon
dioxide (CO ). A chemiluminescent analyzer was used to
determine pdth nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide
(NOs). The sum of NO and NO, is reported as NO Concen-
trations obtained were then fised to calculate the mass of
emission per mile of operation and reported as grams per
mile (gpm).

To measure fuel consumption, a weigh scale system
was used and a carbon balance technique was additionally
applied to provide a cross check. A significant difference
was noted throughout the test program between the actual
fuel weight data and a carbon balance calculation performed
using the emission data collected. As of this report an
explanation for this difference has not been found and
further investigation is continuing. (See table 6)

Running the vehicle with the turbine bypass in the
closed position was found to reduce the hydrocarbon (HC)
between 50 - 70%. This is due to the more even combustion
during deceleration requiring fewer relights. The bypass
system for this particular vehicle has been set to overate
in the open position. However, it can easily be operated
in the closed position. by merely flipping a switch. Oper-
ating in the open mode provides some engine braking and


Background

The New York City Air Resources Board was awarded an
EPA Grant for the purpose of evaluating field experience
with a turbine powered passenger car. The Test and Evaluation
Branch was given the task of testing this prototype vehicle
and developing simplified test procedures which could be used
by New York City personnel. Initial testing of the vehicle
was performed in December 1971 using the 1970 Federal Test
Procedure to satisfy the NYC-Williams contractual obligations.
The vehicle was then delivered to the New York City Air
Resources Board on January 30, 1972, for acceptance and some
public demonstrations. The vehicle was returned to the EPA
laboratory for more extensive testing to obtain complete
emission data and to develop a test procedure to be utilized
by New York ARB while the vehicle is on location in New York
City. The turbine car arrived at the EPA facility February 25,
1972. Testing was conducted through the month of March and
returned -to Williams Corporation for a 60-hour teardown and
inspection as previously agreed with New York City ARB. The
vehicle was returned to EPA after the engine had been torn
down for inspection and after modifications were made to the
shut-down fuel drain system, combustor louver design and gear-
box breather system. It should be kept in mind that this
vehicle incorporates.a "state of the art" engine and does
not represent the emission levels that can potentially be
achieved with gas turbine power plants.

Vehicle Tested

The Williams Gas Turbine, WR-26, regenerative turbine
automotive engine was mounted in a 1971 American Motors
Corporation Hornet test vehicle. The engine utilizes a
Single power turbine to develop 80 horsepower. The engine
regenerator incorporates two large discs of a ceramic-
glass material for inlet air preheating. The standard
AMC automatic transmission is coupled to the engine through
a drop shaft gear system. Indolene Clear gasoline was the
test fuel used throughout the test program.

bots.

Test Program

Testing was accomplished using the 1970, 1972, and
1975 Federal Test Procedures. In addition, steady state


TABLE VI

Fuel Consumption Data
(miles per gallon)

Before Engine Modifications

Actual
Test Procedure BP* Test No. Weighed Data Carbon Balance
1972 FTP (cold start) 0 12-2208 6.15 4.91
1972 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2209 6.28 3.65

. Fuel Consumption Data
_ After Engine Modifications

1972 FTP (cold start) Q 12-2236 - 5.8 4.6
1972 FTP (cold start) C 12-2239 - 6.7 5.4
1972 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2237 6.2 4.6
1972 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2238 7.0 5.1
1972 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2243 7.0 5.9
1972 FTP (hot start) Cc 12-2240 7.1 $.6
1972 FTP (hot start) C 12-2241 8.1 5.5
1972 FTP (hot start) C 12-2242 7.2 5.6
1972 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2245 6.9 $.9
1975 FTP (cold start) 0 12-2244 7.1 6.1
1975 FTP (hot start) 0 12-2246 5.1 6.3
1975 FTP (hot start) C 12-2247 5.1 6.5

*BP - Bypass 0 - Open C- Closed

- 12 -