Steven L. Beshear Governor 'j Energy and Environment Cabinet Department for Environmental Protection Division for Air Quality 200 Fair Oaks Lane, I st Floor Frankfort, Kentucky 40601-1403 www.air.ky.gov

July 1,2009 Mr. A. Stanley Meiburg Acting, Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region IV Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Leonard K. Peters Secretary

Dear Mr. Meiburg: The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet hereby requests that the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA) approve the enclosed amended regulation as a revision to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP). The amended Regulation 2.05, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of Ax Quality, Version #9, incorporates the requirements of, and are no less stringent than, the federal PSD regulation as codified in 40 CFR 52.21. A public comment period was held from February 20, 2009 through March 23, 2009, and comments were received from the Kentucky Division for Air Quality and the U. S. EPA. A public hearing regarding ths SIP revision was conducted by the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD) on May 20,2009. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.103(a), two hard copies and an electronic version of this submittal are provided for your review. The Cabinet appreciates your prompt response to ths request. If you have further questions or concerns about this submittal, please contact Millie Ellis at 502-564-3999, or email ~~illie.ellis(~,ky~.

Secretary LKP/lg Enclosures c: Richard Schutt Lynorae Benjamin

An Fqudl Opponumty Einplo)~~ M vl D

UNBRIDLED SPIRIT

### Air Pollution Control District ofJefferson County, Kentucky SIP 

### Revision Submittal Regulation 2.05 ~915-20-09 June 19,2009AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY JERRY E. ABRAMSON MAYOR LAUREN ANDERSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

### June 19,2009 

### Mr. JohnLyons, Director Division for Air Quality 200 

### Fair Oaks Lane, 1' Floor 

### Frankfort, 

### KY 40601 Dear 

### Mr. Lyons: 

### The Air Pollution Control District ofJefferson County (District) requests that the enclosed material be submitted to the U.S. 

### Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the Jefferson Countyportion ofthe Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP). Enclosed aretwo paper copies and two cd's, one of each for the EPA and one of each for the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (DAQ). 

### The enclosed material is comprised of the following: 1. 

### Amended Regulation 2.05 

### Prevention ofSignzjkant DeteriorationofAir Quality, Version

### #9, adopted May 20,2009, effective June 20,2009. This amended regulation would replace Version 

### #S (June 19,2002)that is currently 

### in 40 CFR §52.92(c)

### EPAApprovedJefferson County Regulations for Kentucky. 2. The supporting documentationdemonstratinglegal adoption of these regulations by the Air Pollution Control Board of Jefferson County. The District thanks you in 

### advance for your and your sws cooperation and assistance. 

### If you have any questions regarding this requestplease do not hesitate to contactMs. Cynthia 

### H. Lee, EnvironmentalManager, at (502) 574-7217 or me. Sincerely,



# . . 

### Executive Director (502) 574-6009 www.louisvilleky.gov WWW.LOUISVILLEKY.GO\21i\PCD 850 BARRET AVENUE. ROOM 205 LOUISVILLE. KENTUCKY 40204.1745 i02T74.6000 FAX: 502.574.5306

### Mr. John Lyons June 

### 9,2009 Page 

### 2 Enclosures Cc 

### wlo Enclosure: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, EPA-4 Ms. Cynthia

### H. Lee

## Completeness Checklist Regulation2.05 

### Prevention of Significant Deterioration of

### Air Quality 1. Submission Letter 

### 2. PollutantIArea Identification 

### 3. Regulation 

### - RedlineIStrikeoutversion 

### 4. Regulation 

### - Final version 

### 5. Regulatory Impact Assessment 

### 6. Committee Meeting Minutes 

### 7. Public Notice - 

### CommentPeriod 8. Public Notice -Public Hearing 

### 9. Public Hearing Minutes 

### 10.Cornment/ResponseDocument 

### 11.Board Minutes 

### 12. Adoption Procedures Checklist 

## PollutantIArea Identification

Pollutant: 

### A11 Affected Area: 

### Jefferson County, Kentucky Location: 

### Louisville MSA Area Designation:

### Nonattainment 

### - Annual PM2.5; Attainment 

### - all 

### other pollutants Area SIP Status: 

### Ozone 

### - maintenance, PM2.5 

### - pending Resulting Emissions Changes: 

### NIA Increase DecreaseVersion#9,Draji #3-Proposed May 20,2009 (Ifadopted, this will amendRegulation 2.05 v.8/6-19-02] REGULATION2.05 Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality Air Pollution Control District ofJefferson County Jefferson County, Kentucky Relates To: KRS Chapter 77 Air Pollution Control Pursuant To: 

### KRS Chapter 77Air Pollution Control Necessity and Function: 

### KRS 77.180 authorizes the Air Pollution Control Board to adopt and enforce all orders, rules, and regulations necessary or proper to accomplish the purposes of KRS Chapter 77. This regulation, which adopts the Federal Prevention of Significant Deteriorationof Air Quality program, provides for the prevention of significant deterioration of air quality where the national ambient air quality standardshave been achieved. SECTION 1 General Provisions 40 CFR 52.21 Prevention of Signijkant Deterioration ofAir Quality (Julv 1, 2008 

## m) is adopted and incorporatedby reference with the following changes: 1.1 Subsection (a)(I)Plan disaaaroval isnot incornorated. 1.2 The term "administrator" as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21 shall mean the Louisville MetroAir Pollution ConfrolDistrict (hereinafter "District"),exceut that: 1.2.1 In subnaraeranh @)(3)(iiiJ (relating to "net emissions increase"), it shall mean either the District or the Administrator of the United States Environmental ProtectionAgencv luSEPA). 1.2.2 In thefollowing subsections, it shall continue tomean theAdministrator of the USEPA: 1.2.2.1 fb)(I7). 1.2.2.2 fb)f37)fi), 1.2.2.3 1b)143), 1.2.2.4 0(48)(ii), 1.2.2.5 lb)15O)fi), 1.2.2.6 @)(51), 1.2.2.7 

### fd, 1.2.2.8 m(2~Version

### #9, Drafi #3-Proposed May 20,2009 [Ifadopted, this will amend Regulation 2.05 v.816-19-02] 1.2.2.9 (dt 1.2.2.10 (t). 1.3 Subsection (c)Ambient air incrementsshall have thefollowinp sentences added at the end: "No sin& new or modified stutionarv source may consume an inordinate portion of the available increment, as determined bv the Board The Board mav consider air aualitv and economic imuacts on the communitv in determining the apnropriate amount ofincrement allowedfor a new or modified stationarv source." 1.4 Subsection (h)(ltshall read: "The degree of emission limitation rewiredfor control of anv airpollutant under this section shall not be affectedin any manner bv a dispersion techniquepursuant toDistrict Regulation 2.10 Stack Height Considerations." 1.5 Subsection &)(3)is added and shall read: "TheBoard mav reauire an increase in the stuck heipht of 

### a proposed new source or modification 

### ifthe anplicant's modeling demonstration indicates an inordinate amount ofincrement consumution. In no event shall such increased stack heipht exceed the stack height allowed for the modeling demonstrationpursuant to subsection &J(l) of thisRegulation. 

### " 1.6 Subsection (a)Public ~articipation is not incorporated The District shall foNow the applicablepublic particination procedures inDistrict Regulation 2.0% 1.7 Subsection (sJ Environmentalimoact statement is not incorporated 1.8 Subsection (u)Delegation of authority 

### is not incorporated. Thefollowin~ons of 40 CFR 52.21 are not incorporatedherein: 1.9 1.9.1 Thesecond sentence of(b)(2)fiii)(a), 1.9.2 (b)(55), 1.9.3 (bJ(56), 1.9.4 (bJ(57), 1.9.5 (bJ(58, 1.9.6 kc). 1.10 The Executive Director of the District shall transmit to the Administrator of the USEPA a copv ofeach permit application filed under this regulation and shall notifj 2.05-2Version#9,Draft #3-Proposed 

### Mq 20,2009 [Ifadopted, this will amendRegulation 2.05 v.8/6-19-02] the Administrator of the USEPA of each sipnificant action the Executive Director takes on the auulication.Version#9,

### Draft #3-Proposed 

### May 20,2009 [gadopted, thiswill amendReguIation 2.05 v.8/6-19-02]Version#9,Draji #3-Proposed May 20,2009 [If adopted, this will amend Regulation 2.05 v.8/6-19-02]

1.12 !r, 

## t'.-'--t 2, 

### ---t-----'--------'. 

# *""

"

### ...



## st4.22 P,f,rerxer, +- 

# ..- ,----L'-\;-y 

# - - \I 

### , ,

1.24 The " 33 . " 2, 

### 4.15 

### Tke- u >> 

### . " 

### ,>Version#9,Drafr #3-Proposed 

### Mq 20,2009 [Ifadopted thiswill amend Regulation 2.05 v.8/6-19-02]

Adopted v114-19-72; effective 4-19-72; amended ~216-13-79, ~314-21-82, ~4111-16-83, v514-16- 86, v612-17-88, ~714-19-89, ~816-19-02, v91REGULATION 2.05 Prevention of SignificantDeterioration of Air Quality Air Pollution Control District ofJefferson County Jefferson County, Kentucky Relates To: KRS Chapter 77 Air Pollution Control Pursuant To: KRS Chapter 77 Air Pollution Control Necessity and Function: KRS 77.180 authorizes the Air Pollution Control Board to adopt and enforce all orders, rules, and regulations necessary or proper to accomplish the purposes of KRS Chapter 77. This regulation, which adopts the Federal Prevention of SignificantDeterioration of Air Quality program, provides for the prevention of significant deterioration of air quality where the national ambient air quality standards have been achieved. SECTION 

### 1 General Provisions 40 CFR 52.21 

### Prevention ofSignz3cant Deterioration ofAir Quality (July 1, 2008) is adopted and incorporated by reference with the followingchanges: 1.1 Subsection (a)(l) 

### Plan disapproval is not incorporated. 1.2 The term "administrator" as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21 shall mean the LouisvilleMetro Air Pollution Control District (hereinafter "District"), except that: In subparagraph (b)(3)(iii) (relating to "net emissions increase"), it shall mean either the District or the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). In the following subsections, it shall continue to mean the Administrator of the USEPA: ?3m71> (b)(37)(i)> (b)(43), @)(48)(ii)> (b)(50)(i), (b)(511, (g), (1)(2)3 

## (PI, (0. 1.3 Subsection (c) 

### Ambient air increments shall have the following sentences added at the end: "No single new or modified stationarysourcemay consume an inordinate portion of the available increment, as determined by the Board. The Board may consider air quality and economic impacts on the community in determining the appropriate amount of incrementallowed for a new or modified stationarysource." 1.4 Subsection @)(I) shall read: '-The degree of emission limitation required for control of any air pollutant under this section shall not be affected in any manner by a dispersion technique pursuant to District Regulation 2.10 

### Stack Height Considerations." 1.5 Subsection @)(3) is added and shall read: "The Board may require an increase in the 2.05-1stack height of a proposed new source or modification if the applicant's modeling demonstration indicates an inordinate amount of increment consumption. In no event shall such increased stack height exceed the stack height allowed for the modeling demonstration pursuant to subsection (h)(l) of this Regulation." Subsection (q) Public participation is not incorporated. The District shall follow the applicable public participation procedures in District Regulation2.07. Subsection (s) Environmental impact statement is not incorporated. Subsection (u) Delegation of authority is not incorporated. The following sectionsof40 CFR 52.21 are not incorporated herein: The second sentence of (b)(2)(iii)(a), (b)(55)> (b)(56)> (b)(57)> @)(58)> (cc). The Executive Director of the District shall transmit to the Administrator of the USEPA a copy of each permit application filed under this regulation and shall notify the Administrator of the USEPA of each significant action the Executive Director takes on the application. Adopted v114-19-72; effective 4-19-72; amended v216-13-79, v314-21-82, ~4111-16-83, v514-16- 86, ~612-17-88, v714-19-89, ~816-19-02, v915-20-09.Purpose of the Draft Proposed Action: The purpose ofthe draft proposed action is to update the existing regulation to be consistent with the current EPA prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) regulation (40 CFR 52.21 (July 1, 2008)). The draft proposed action incorporatesthe federal PSD regulation, includingthe provisions for permits based on plant-wide applicability limits (PALS). The proposed amended regulation specifically excludes those sections of 40 CFR 52.21 stayed by court order.

Estimated Costs and Savings: The draft proposed action doesnot changethe cost or savings associated with meetingthe current federal requirements.

Feasibility ofAll Alternatives: There are no alternatives available; these changes are required by EPA.

Comparisonwith Any Minimum or Uniform Standards: There are no changes in the draft proposed action that are inconsistent with the federal requirements, differences are included in the current District regulation.

Report on Public Outreach Efforts: 

### A notice of informal review was sent to various members of the community,EPA Region 4, and the Kentucky Division for Air Quality. A legal notice of a public comment period was published in the Courier-Journal on February20,2009; comments were received through March 23,2009. In addition, an open meeting will be held May 20, 2009 to discussthe draft regulation.

Air Pollution Control District May 20,2009lMinutes Policy CommitteeMeeting of the LooisvilleMetro 

### Air Pollution Control Board February 18,2009 A meeting of the Policy Committee of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control Board was called to order on February 18,2009, at 9:48 a.m. inthe SecondFIoor ConferenceRoom ofthe Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky, by Committee Chair, Mr. Ronald Thomas. Ms. VanessaRuffin, committeemember, andDr. Robert Powell, adhoccommitteemember, were in attendance. A quorum was present. The following Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District) staff members were present: LaurenAnderson, Joseph Schweinhart, CynthiaLee, Paul 

### G. Aud, Michelle Stites, and MonicaLittle. Also present was Assistant County Attorney StacyFritze. 

### 1. Draft amendment 

### to Regulation 

### 2.05 Prevention of Signzjicant 

### Deterioration of 

### Air Qztality, Version #9, Draft #2 -External, February 

### 16,2009 Ms. Lee saidthe purpose for the draftamendmenttoRegulation 2.05 istoupdatethe existing regulationto reflect economic growth, enhance air quality onpublic land, andprotectpublic health and welfare for either new sources or existing major sources. Ms. Stites stated that sinceRegulation2.05was adopted, the federalprogrammade severalrevisionsand the District's proposed amendments

### will incorporatethe federalchanges. 

### In addition, several updates were made to the regulation after the January 2009 Board meeting to include two provisions that give specific authority to the Board and address other environmental factors in the community. Ms. Stites said the amendmentsare consistent with the current

### EPAprevention ofsigniGcantdeterioration (PSD)regulation(40



### . . CFR 52.21). Also, the &aft propoued acbon mcorporates the federal PSD reg~latio:: which includes the provisions for permits based on plant-wide applicabilityLimits (PALS). Ms. Lee reported that one comment was received from Ford Motor Company which was favorable. Ms. Lee saidthe Districtrecommends thatthe Policy Committee approve the proposed amendmentsto Regulation 2.05, Version #9, Draft. #2, External -February 16, 2009, to begin the formal public review process. Motion: 

### Mr. Thomas moved that the proposed amendments to Regulation 2.05 begin the formal public review process 

### as recommendedby the District. The motion passed unanimously. Adjournment eetmg adjourned at 958a.m. 

# A'



# &~/rnmRonald Thomas Chair Secretaty-TreasurerThe LouISYIII~ Metro Air Poilution Control Board opens a pubjic comment perrad Februaw 211 2DO3, on pro- ~;sedamendments to DlstFtci Resariations 2.05 Preventiofl of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality,Version #9 Draft #2 

### - ~r&osed February 1 2bo9. if adopie? by the Board, it will be submitted to the US. Envirmmentai Prntection A9en~yfor inclu- son tn the Kentucky State Im

## EtE"*tiOn Written statements wit1 be ac cepted by the Baard. Joseph E Schw-WL. Secret?wTr%- surer. Louisvliie Metre Air Poliu-. tlon Control Dl5- tritt 850 Barret , Ave., Loulsvliie. KY 40204-17458 Until 5:OD p.m. March 23.2009. Written statements will also be acce ted eiecpnic2y untli the same deadfine via the Internetat the 

### . e-man address"airress@misvlfleky-gov'. Oral statqments will be accepted at the puhl~chearIng on April 15. 2009 at l0:OO am. iiithe soard Rmm. 8511 Barn Ave, Louisviii* A paper copy of the proposed regulatil)~ may beobtaiied from Monica Little. (502) 574-7246, between S a.m. and sn.m. Mondaythroylh Fdday. An electronic COPY of the proposed reiwktlonsmay be downioaded f r om t h 'e Di5trict's website at "www.louiNilte ky~ov/a~c~/oo cKe+htm*. Notlce of Public Hearing The Louisville Metro Air Polfutlon control Board Will con- duct a public hearin on May 20,

## ZWJ+on pro- posed amendmentsto DIS~FICL Regulation 2.05 Pleventlon ol significant Dete- ;orattan of Air

ualzty.Version 9, Draft #3

## - Proposed, May 20,2009. WIitten and oral statements wlli bear cepted at the p~blk hearing at IC:OO am. in tne Board Room, 850 Barret Ave. Louisville. lf adopted by the Board, Itwlli be Ls~bmlttedto the U.5. Environmental Protection A ency tor lndusjlon in the Kentucky State 3mgpa;,mtation A paper copy of the ropused reeuf!ation may beobtained from Monlca Little, (5021 574-7246, between 8 a.m. and 5p.m. Moq- daythrough Frrday, An electronic copy of the proposed regulations may be downlcaded from the Disel& ebsite at ~.Euiwille- kg.eow/AP~CD/Do c ethfm'

### PublicHearing Minutes of the Louisville Metro Air PolIution Control Board May 20,2009

A public hearing of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Conk01Board was called to order on May 20, 2009, at 10:04 am. in the Board Room of the Louisville Meko Air Pollution Control District @iskict), 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky, by the Chairman, Dr. Robert Powell. 

### General Statement, Rules and Purpose The Chairman read the opening announcements, desand purpose of the Public Hearing, which was to review proposed amendments to Regulation 2.05 

### Prevention of Deterioration of 

### Air Quality,Version #9, 

### Draft #3-Proposed May 20,2009. 

### 1. Regulation2.05

### Prevention 

### of Deterioration ofAir Quality,Version 

### #9, 

### Draft#3 -Proposed May 20,2009 Michelle Stites, Environmental Coordinator, reviewed the proposed amendments to Regulation 2.05 that were required in order to be consistent with the current 

### EPA prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) regulation. Ms. Stites said the draft regulation incorporated the federal PSD regulation. Ms. Stites said that during the public comment period, the District ~eceived comments from the Kentucky Division for Air Quality and EPA statingtheir approval of the changes.



### Mr. Greg Long, representing the Ford Motor Company, expressed Ford's support of the proposed modifications to Regulation 2.05, which will allow the local Ford plants to remain flexibleand competitive. Ms. Emily Boone, representing the Clifton Community Council, stated the council encourages the Board to continueto enforceregulations to improve the community's 

### air quality. 

### Adjournment The public hearing adjourned at 10:1 1a.m.

Robert 

### W. Powell, M.D. Chairman Secretary-Treasurer

### Regulation 2.05 

## Prevention ofSignzjicantDeterioration of Air Quality Version #9, Draft 

### #3 

# - Adopted May 20,2009

I. Public CommentPeriod: 2-20-09 to 3-23-09 1. John Lyons, Kentucky Division for Air Quality (DAQ) (Rec'd 3/23/09) 2. Richard Schutt, Region 4, Environmental Protection Agency @PA) (Rec'd 3/26/09) Comment: 

### Prior concurrence is wanted because the urouosedremlation does not 

# - A < 

# - appear to be less stringentthat the correspondingCommonwealth ofKenhrclj administrative regulationKAR 51:017. @AQ) Response: The District agrees. Comment: 

### Incorporation by reference ofthe Federal Regulationsat 40 CFR 52.21 with District amendments is appropriate. @PA) Response: Tfle District agrees. Comment: 

### TheDistrict should include a complete datefor the referencedversion of the federal rule to provide clarity for applicability and enforcementpurposes. @PA) Response: The District agrees and the complete date has been included in Version 9, Draft 3. Comment: 

### Inprovision 1.2.2 of Section 1, General Provisions, theDistrict should include referencestopmagraphs b(43), b(48)(ii), and b(50)fi)when ident&ing the term "Administrator". @PA) Response: The District agrees and those paragraphs have been included in Version 9, Draft 3. 

### II. Public Hearing: 5-20-09 

### HI. Substantive Changes Resulting from Public Review Process None as a result of the Public CommentPeriod.

Regulation 2.05 1

### Minutes RegularMeeting of the LouisvilleMetro Air Pollntion Control Board May 20,2009

The regular meeting of the Louisville Metro Air 

### Pollution Control Board (Board) was called to order on May 20,2009, at 10:12 a.m. in 

### the Board Room of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, 850 Barret Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky, by the 

### Chairman, Dr. Robert Powell. Other Board members present were Ms. Barbara Sexton Smith, Ms. 

### Vanessa Ruffm, Mr. 

### Ronald Thomas, Ms. Bode Biemer, and Mr. 

### Bill Jacob. A 

### quorumwas present. The following Louisville Metro Air 

### Pollution Control District (District) staffmembers were present: Joseph Schwedart,Tem Phelps, Eva Addison, Steven Gravatte, Michelle Stites, Steve Taylor, Erin 

### Vachon, Craig Butler, Karen Thorne, Shannon Clemons, Martha Gammons, Monica Little, and District interns Dustin Gohs and Steven Grice. Also present was 

### Assistant County AttorneyMatt Lemme, and County Attorney staffmember Tammy Brown. The following guests were present: Emily Boone, Clifton Community Council; Greg Brotzge, Louisville Chemistry Partnership; Tim Corrigan, GLI; Brad Dillon, GD&M; Tim 

### Hooker, LFI; Frank 

### Kennedy, 

### KEC; Greg Long, Ford-Louisville Assembly Plant; Cheryl-Lynne Patrick, Frost Brown Todd; Sarah Scheetz, 

### E.ON U.S.; Lauran Sturrn, Stites & 

### Harbison; and Paige Mosser Theriac, Theriac Environmental Consultants,Inc. Approval ofminutes 

### The minutes of the Public Hearing and regular Board meeting held on April 15, 2009, were approved 

### as written. Public Comment Emily Boone, representing the Clifton Community Council, said the residents of Cliftonwere concerned about the community's 

### air quality. Ms. 

### Boone also said they appreciate the work the District is doing to improve air quality. 

### New Business A. ProposedAmendments to Regulation 2.05Prevention ofSignifiantDeterioration of 

### Air Quality,Version #9, Draft #3 

### -Proposed May 20,2009 Ms. Stites, Environmental Coordinator, said the District recommends that the Board adopt Regulation2.05, Version 

### #9, Draft

### #3, as 

### proposed. Motion: Ms. Ruff111 

### moved to adopt the amendmentsto Regulation 2.05 as proposed by the District.

The motion passed unanimously.B. Presentation of ClimateAction Report Ms. Stites presented an overview of the Climate Action Report which was released to the public on Earth Day, April 22, 2009. She said the report was created by the Climate Change Committee of the Partnership for a Green City, which includes Louisville Mebo Government, the University of Louisville, and Jefferson County Public Schools. Ms. Stites stated the report contains a variety of greenhouse gas emissions reduction strategies for the community that address areas such as energy use, land use, transportation, urban forestry, water and local impacts. She said the next steps include a review of the report by the individual partners, community education and outreach, and implementation, which is currently underway. The 

### hIl report is available at

### http://www.louisvilleky.gov/APCDI 

### C1imateChangelReport.htm. Ms. Biemer said she was very pleased 

### with the committee's report. Committee Reports A. STARAdvisory Group Dr. Powell said the STAR Advisory Group (SAG) held its final meeting on April 17, 2009. The SAG finished the agenda from the previous meeting and the next step is to recommend strategiestothe District and Board. 

### B. Policy Committee Mr. Thomas, Chair of the Policy Committee, reported the Policy Committee met on May 13, 2009, to review and discuss District Regulation 2.04. He stated the committee's decision to start the public comment period for Regulation 2.04 was rescinded becawe of comments received from EPA. The District will start the public comment period after EPA's concerns with Regulation 2.04 have been resolved. Staff Reports A. Director 

### Mr. Schweinhart reported that Ms. Anderson, Executive Director, was 

### out oftown attending a Region 

### 4 Air Director's conference in Atlanta, Georgia. He said the District is involved 

### in numerous efforts to improve the community's 

### air quality which include implementation of strategies included 

### in the Climate Action Keport, reviewing and updating Distdct regulations, and involvement in the upcoming recommendations fromthe STAR Advisory Group. 

### B. Air Quality Data Dr. Powell stated the community experiencedhistorical lows in PM2.5 concentrations 

### in April 2009 because of milder spring winds, and a general downturn in manufacturing due to the economic conditions. He also stated that ozone levels were low. The 

### air quality monitoring reports were submitted for fhg. A copy of each report is attachedtothe original minutes. Louisville Metro 2 Air PollutionControl Board Board Meeting May 20,2009C. 

### EnforcementStab Reports The enforcement reports were submitted for filing. A copy is attached to the original minutes. 

### D. Excess Emission Report The April 2009 

### ExcessEmissionReports were submitted for filing. A copy is attachedto the original minutes. 

### E. Permit

### ApptieationReports The pennit application reports were submitted for filing. A copy is attached to the original minutes. 

### F. Lawn Care 

### for Cleaner

### Air Awards The list ofthis month's 

### Lawn Care for Cleaner

### AirAward recipients was submittedfor filing. A copy is attachedto the originalminutes. 

### Next Meeting The next regular Board meeting is scheduled Wednesday, 

### June 17,2009, at 10:OO a.m. 

### Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:32 a.m.

RobertW. Powell, M.D.

Louisville Metro Air Pollution ControlBoard Board Meeting May 20,2009

# Regulation Tracking Form

Regulation: 

### 2.05 Title: Prevention of SignificantDeterioration Originator: 

### Michelle Stites 

# 1 Activify 

# I Date 

# ( Approved 

# I

Draft 1

### - Internal PreliminaryRegulatory Impact Assessment Review by Director Draft 1

### - External 01-20-09 01-20-09

Draf?2 

### - External 

# ( Send To EPA/ KY DAQ (Formal Proposed Package) 

# 1 02-19-09 

# 1 MI. 

# I MS MS 01-21-09 01-21-09

Review by Policy Committee Draft 2 -Proposed 

# 1 Notice in Newspaper, 30-Day Public CommentPeriod (cfoses3-23-09) 

# 1 02-20-09 

# 1 JS 

# I LA MS 02-16-09 MS 02-18-09 02-18-09 JS JS

Notice in Newspaper, Public Hearing 2dN~tice in Newspaper, Public Hearing Public Hearing waft 3) 

# I Final Regulatory Impact Assessment 

# 1 05-20-09 

# 1 MS 

# I I Board Action 02-20-09 05-08-09 05-20-09 JS JS JS 

# I 05-20-09

Final CommentResponseDocument SIP Submittal JS

05-20-09 06-19-09 CL CL