alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George W. Brown, appellant, v. Robert Conover, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,082.

Action for commissions upon the sale of real estate. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Stark county; the Hon. Charles V. Miles, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 25, 1922,

James H. Rennick and John W. Fling, Jr., for appellant. F. B. Brian and T. W. Hoopes, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §1885d. Biennial reports

(a) By January 30 of each odd-numbered year, the Director shall simultaneously transmit a report to the Congress, the Attorney General, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Education, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(b) The report required by subsection (a) shall contain—

(1) an accounting and comparison, by sex, race, and ethnic group and by discipline, of the participation of women and men in scientific and engineering positions, including—

(A) the number of individuals in permanent and temporary and in full-time and part-time scientific and engineering positions by appropriate level or similar category;

(B) the average salary of individuals in such scientific and engineering positions;

(C) the number and type of promotional opportunities realized by individuals in such scientific and engineering positions;

(D) the number of individuals serving as principal investigators in federally conducted or federally supported research and development; and

(E) the unemployment rate of individuals seeking scientific and engineering positions;

(2) an assessment, including quantitative and other data, of the proportion of women and minorities studying scientific and engineering fields, including mathematics and computer skills, at all educational levels; and

(3) such other data, analyses, and evaluations as the Director, acting on the advice of the Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering, determines appropriate to carry out the Foundation's functions as well as the policies and programs of sections 1885 to 1885d of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–516, §37, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3013; Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §111(b)(9), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 108–360, title II, §208, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 1885 to 1885d of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), was in the original "this Act", meaning sections 31 et seq. of Pub. L. 96–516, known as the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act, which enacted sections 1885 to 1885d of this title and provisions set out as notes under sections 1861 and 1885 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1980 Amendment note set out under section 1861 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–360 substituted "By January 30 of each odd-numbered year" for "By January 30, 1982, and biennially thereafter".

1985—Subsec. (b)(1), (2). Pub. L. 99–159, §111(b)(9)(A), substituted "engineering" for "technical" wherever appearing.

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 99–159, §111(b)(9)(B), substituted "Engineering" for "Technology".
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear at 68 FR 51358, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 141.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of State.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jeffrey S. Levin, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of MORGAN STANLEY DIRECT LENDING FUND (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





• the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 18, 2022/s/ Jeffrey S. LevinJeffrey S. LevinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





* The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1571-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alaska (FEMA-1571-DR), dated November 15, 2004, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 30, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alaska is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of November 15, 2004:

The Kashunamiut (Chevak) Regional Educational Attendance Area (REAA), the Lower Kuskokwim REAA, the Lower Yukon REAA, and the Pribilof Island REAA for Public Assistance.

All areas in the State of Alaska are eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-27137 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0604. THE STATE v. VICTOR HENDERSON.

A19A0605. THE STATE v. BENNIE WILLIS.

The State has charged co-defendants Victor Henderson and Bennie Wills with

second-degree burglary and theft by receiving. The defendants moved to suppress

statements they allegedly made to law enforcement officers, and, after a Jackson

Denno1hearing, the trial court granted the motion and ordered that the statements

would be excluded from the evidence presented at trial. The State then filed these

notices of appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction because the trial court’s ruling has

not been reduced to writing.

Pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4), in a criminal case the State may file a direct

appeal from a pretrial decision which suppresses evidence on the ground that it was

illegally seized. The Supreme Court has held that this provision covers a pretrial

order, issued after a Jackson Denno hearing, that granted a defendant’s motion to

suppress hisstatement asinvoluntary. State v. Andrade, 298 Ga. 464 (782 SE2d 665)

(2016). Here, as in Andrade, the trial court held a Jackson Denno hearing and then

granted the defendants’ motion to suppress on the ground that the statements were

involuntary. Thus, the State’s appeal from the trial court’s ruling falls within the

scope of OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4).

The record on appeal, however, does not include a written order granting the

motion to suppress. “It is elementary that an oral order is not final nor appealable

until and unless it isreduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk.”

1

 See Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (84 SC 1774, 12 LE2d 908) (1964).

November 20, 2018
Sharp v. State, 183 Ga. App. 641, 642 (1) (360 SE2d 50) (1987). There is an

exception when the record “affirmatively showsthat the State requested the trial court

to put the oral orders in written form and that the trial court refused to do so.” State

v. Lynch, 286 Ga. 98, 99 (686 SE2d 244) (2009) (punctuation omitted). See also

State v. Kipple, 294 Ga. App. 420, 422 (2) (669 SE2d 185) (2008). In this case, the

record on appeal does not reflect any such affirmative request by the State.2

Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to review the trial court’s ruling, and these appeals

are hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2 The clerk of the trial court sent a letter to our Clerk, stating that there is no

“Final Order Suppressing the Defendants’ Statement to Law Enforcement.” As an

attachment to this letter, the clerk provided an email from the prosecutor in which he

advised that the judge would not be entering a written order. The record itself,

however, does not reflect that the State asked the judge to enter a written order and

the judge denied that request.

11/20/2018
#### § 300.200 General.

A person having one or more accounts cleared by the member on a fully disclosed basis for one or more introducing brokers or dealers is a customer of the member and shall be protected with respect to such account or accounts without regard to the protection available for any other account or accounts he may have with the member.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/ CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|August 9, 2007                                                   |  | 

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Timothy Fairbanks, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006         By:  /s/ Timothy Fairbanks    Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Dominick Parrella, Deceased. Earle Parrella, Appellant; Lafayette National Bank of Brooklyn in New York et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding for the probate of a will, contestant appeals from an order granting petitioner’s motion for an examination before trial of contestant. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph thereof items of examination numbered *“*I ”, “ IV ” and *“*V ”, and by substituting therefor the following item: *“*All of the relevant facts and circumstances in connection with the preparation and execution of the instrument propounded for probate in this proceeding ”. The order is further modified by striking from the third ordering paragraph thereof all language following the word “ pertaining ”, and substituting therefor the following: *“*to the matters upon which examination is granted by the foregoing provisions of this order and which are in his possession or under his control ”, and by striking out the last ordering paragraph. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The examination shall proceed within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry. In our opinion items *“*I ”, *“*IV ” and *“*V ” are improper in form, in that they state conclusions rather than subjects of examination, and the third ordering paragraph might have been construed as requiring the production of papers, etc., which would be outside the scope of the examination, or which are not within contestant’s possession or control. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Subpart 5348.1 — POLICIES AND

PROCEDURES

Parent topic: Part 5348 - Value Engineering

5348.104-3 Sharing Collateral Savings

(a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Georgina Cruz, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Motion for permission to appeal as a poor person and to prosecute appeal without the necessity of paying Clerk, court or other fees to obtain records or documents relative to the appeal. Permission to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion in all other respects denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0328. DEMETRIS J. WILSON v. THE STATE.

In 2014, Demetris Wilson entered a guilty plea to charges of involuntary

manslaughter and aggravated assault. He was sentenced to a total term of twenty

years with fifteen years in custody. Wilson then filed a motion to set aside his

convictions because the indictment was not returned in open court. The trial court

denied the motion on July 5, 2019, and Wilson filed the instant notice of appeal on

August 16, 2019. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

First, Wilson’s appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30

days after entry of an appealable order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely

filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, Wilson

filed his notice of appeal 42 days after entry of the trial court’s order.

Second,to the extent Wilson challenges his convictions, the Supreme Court has

made clear that a motion seeking to challenge an allegedly invalid or void judgment

of conviction “is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of

a judgment in a criminal case” and that an appeal from the denial of such a motion is

subject to dismissal. Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). 

Thus, Wilson is not authorized to collaterally attack his conviction in this manner.

See id.; Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Matherlee v.

State, 303 Ga. App. 765, 766 (694 SE2d 665) (2010).

Based on the foregoing, Wilson’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 01, 2019

10/01/2019
## 'I'O'\VN OF WEST YEI _JLOWSTONE

# MO~
February 27 , 2013 Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office of Aviation Analysis United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave. , SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: EAS Carrier Selection , West Yellowstone, Montana, DOT-OST-2003-14626 Dear Mr. DeVany, The Town ofWest Yellowstone , Montana, supports the proposal submitted by SkyWest Airlines to operate as the Essential Air Service (EAS) air carrier at the Yellowstone Airport for the 2013 and 2014 summer seasons. The Town has benefited from its relationship with SkyWest Airlines since 1987 and appreciates the reliable and vital service it provides to West Yellowstone and the surrounding area. SkyWest has made notable efforts in the past to work with our community by altering its flight schedule to better serve visitors to West Yellowstone. Sky West is a well-established airline and provides good connection options to many cities in the country. The Town appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposal and for your consideration when making a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary
. Sincerely,

# ~Jv~ Jerry Johnson M ayor
c: D ebbie Alke , MDT Aeronautics Division

P
. O. Box 1570 West Yellowstone, Monta.na 59758 (406) 646

-7795 Fax (406) 646-75! 1
#### Hyman Marcus et al. v. Austin Associates, Inc., et al.

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to dispense with the printing in the record on appeal of the exhibits, on condition that the originals thereof are filed with this court on or before the Wednesday preceding the first day of the term for which the appeal is noticed for argument. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: June 30,2005

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Assurance Company
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago,IL 60685


13F File Number: 28-386

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
August 12,2005
Chicago, Illinois, 60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which Continental Assurance Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of Continental Assurance Company.
<Page>