46180 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

7400.9W, Airspace Designations and 

Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, 

and effective September 15, 2012, . . .’’ 

and add in its place ‘‘Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, . . .’’. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 29, 

2014. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations 

Group . 

[FR Doc. 2014–18417 Filed 8–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0082; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ASO–3] 

Amendment and Revocation of Class E 

Airspace; Tuskegee, AL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class 

E airspace designation for Moton Field 

Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL, by 

correcting the state from TN to AL. This 

action also removes reference to the 

Class E airspace, Tuskegee, AL, which 

was never amended due to the incorrect 

state error. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 

18, 2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, and subsequent amendments can 

be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/ 

air_traffic/publications/. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to http://www.archives.gov/

federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy and 

ATC Procedures Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202– 

267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On June 18, 2013, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a final rule 

amending Class E airspace at Moton 

Field Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL 

(78 FR 36411). The airspace designation 

title incorrectly listed the state as TN, 

instead of AL, and therefore was listed 

incorrectly FAA Order 7400.9X. By 

listing the amendment under TN, it then 

left the Class E airspace for Tuskegee, 

AL, unchanged in the Order. This action 

makes the corrections. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, 

and effective September 15, 2013, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This amendment to Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

removes the Class E airspace 

designation and description for 

Tuskegee Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, 

AL. This action also corrects the Class 

E airspace designation title for Moton 

Field Municipal Airport, Tuskegee, AL, 

from ASO TN E5, Tuskegee, AL, to ASO 

AL E5, Tuskegee, AL. This is an 

administrative change and does not 

affect the boundaries, altitudes, or 

operating requirements of the airspace, 

therefore, notice and public procedure 

under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is unnecessary. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends the 

airspace at Tuskegee Municipal Airport, 

Tuskegee, AL. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward from 700 feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASO AL E5 Tuskegee, AL [Removed] 

Tuskegee Municipal Airport, AL 

* * * * * 

ASO AL E5 Tuskegee, AL [Amended] 

Moten Field Municipal Airport, AL 

(Lat. 32°27′38′′ N., long. 85°40′48′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile 

radius of Moten Field Municipal Airport. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 46181 

1 2 U.S.C. 1532. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 24, 

2014. 

Myron A Jenkins, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18415 Filed 8–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Parts 200 and 2700 

[Docket No. FR–5795–F–01] 

RIN 2502–AJ24 

Removal of Emergency Homeowners’ 

Loan Program Regulations 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: Through this rule, HUD 

removes regulations for the Emergency 

Homeowners’ Loan Program. The 

statutory authority to provide 

emergency assistance to homeowners 

under this program expired on 

September 30, 2011. Because these 

regulations are no longer operative, they 

are being removed by this final rule. To 

the extent that assistance made available 

under this program is still ongoing, the 

removal of these regulations does not 

affect the requirements for transactions 

entered into when these parts were in 

effect. Assistance made available under 

the Emergency Homeowners’ Loan 

Program will continue to be governed by 

the regulations that existed immediately 

before September 8, 2014. 

DATES: Effective date: September 8, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Camille E. Acevedo, Associate General 

Counsel for Legislation and Regulations, 

Office of General Counsel, Department 

of Housing and Urban Development, 

451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, 

Washington, DC 20410; telephone 202– 

708–1793 (this is not a toll-free 

number). Persons with hearing or 

speech impairments may access this 

number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877– 

8389. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On July 2, 1975, the Emergency 

Housing Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94–50) (12 

U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) was signed into law. 

Title I of this statute is the Emergency 

Homeowners’ Relief Act (1975 Act), 

which conferred on HUD standby 

authority to insure or make loans to, or 

make emergency mortgage relief 

payments on behalf of, homeowners to 

defray their mortgage expenses 

(collectively emergency assistance). The 

goal of the program was to prevent 

widespread mortgage foreclosures and 

distress sales of homes by homeowners 

who had experienced a substantial 

reduction of income resulting from the 

temporary involuntary loss of 

employment or underemployment due 

to adverse economic conditions. HUD 

promulgated regulations implementing 

the 1975 Act on December 30, 1975 (see 

40 FR 59866) and codified these 

regulations in 24 CFR part 2700. This 

emergency assistance program, quickly 

put in place by HUD in 1975, was not 

utilized and, in 1995, as part of HUD’s 

effort to remove outdated, obsolete, or 

unutilized regulations, HUD removed 

the regulations in 24 CFR part 2700 

from the CFR. (See 60 FR 47263.) 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. 

L.111–203) (the Dodd-Frank Act), 

signed into law on July 21, 2010, 

reauthorized the 1975 Act, with certain 

amendments, and the Emergency 

Homeowners’ Loan Program (EHLP). 

The Dodd-Frank Act also made 

available $1,000,000,000 for HUD to 

provide emergency mortgage assistance 

on behalf of homeowners struggling to 

make mortgage payments due to a 

substantial reduction of income 

resulting from the temporary 

involuntary loss of employment or 

underemployment due to adverse 

economic conditions. In accordance 

with the 1975 Act, as reauthorized and 

amended, HUD reinstituted regulations 

for EHLP on March 4, 2011, at 76 FR 

11946, and administered EHLP. (For 

further information about EHLP, see 76 

FR 11946 through 11948.) 

The reauthorization of EHLP, however 

was only for one fiscal year, fiscal year 

(FY) 2011. September 30, 2011 was the 

last date upon which HUD could enter 

into binding agreements with individual 

mortgagors approved for participation in 

EHLP. As provided in the March 4, 

2011, rule, a binding agreement was 

considered to have occurred only when 

a borrower had been approved for 

participation in this program and funds 

had been allocated to that borrower, all 

of which must have occurred on or 

before September 30, 2011. 

This Final Rule 

Since authority for HUD to enter into 

agreements with borrowers to provide 

emergency assistance under the EHLP 

expired on September 30, 2011, HUD is 

proceeding to remove EHLP regulations 

codified in 24 CFR part 2700. 

Emergency assistance provided under 

EHLP that is still outstanding will 

continue to be governed by the 

regulations in effect prior to September 

8, 2014. Accordingly, this rule amends 

24 CFR 200.1301 (Expiring Programs— 

Savings Clause) of 24 CFR 200, subpart 

W (Administrative Matters), and adds a 

new paragraph (f) to § 200.1301, which 

preserves the EHLP regulations as in 

effect prior to the effective date of this 

final rule and continues to govern any 

assistance provided under EHLP on or 

before September 30, 2011. 

II. Justification for Final Rulemaking 

HUD generally publishes a rule for 

public comment before issuing a final 

rule for effect, in accordance with 

HUD’s own regulations on rulemaking 

in 24 CFR part 10. However, part 10 

provides for exceptions to the general 

rule if the agency finds good cause to 

omit advance notice and public 

participation. The good cause 

requirement is satisfied when prior 

public procedure is impracticable, 

unnecessary, or contrary to the public 

interest.’’ (See 24 CFR 10.1.) 

HUD finds that public notice and 

comment are not necessary for this 

rulemaking because the authority to 

provide assistance under EHLP expired 

on September 30, 2011, assistance is no 

longer being provided under this 

program and therefore, the regulations 

are no longer operative. For these 

reasons, HUD has determined that it is 

unnecessary to delay the effectiveness of 

this rule in order to solicit prior public 

comment. 

III. Findings and Certification 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires 

an agency to conduct a regulatory 

flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 

notice and comment rulemaking 

requirements, unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Because HUD 

has determined that good cause exists to 

issue this rule without prior public 

comment, this rule is not subject to the 

requirement to publish an initial or final 

regulatory flexibility analysis under the 

RFA as part of such action. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform 

Section 202 of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 1

requires that an agency prepare a 

budgetary impact statement before 

promulgating a rule that includes a 

Federal mandate that may result in the 

expenditure by state, local and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES