alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §17158. Funding

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) Grants

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the provision of grants under the program $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

#### (2) Administrative costs

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for administrative expenses of the program—

(A) $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 and 2009;

(B) $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011; and

(C) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2012.

#### (b) Maintenance of funding

The funding provided under this section shall supplement (and not supplant) other Federal funding provided under—

(1) a State energy conservation plan established under part D of title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6321 et seq.); or

(2) the Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income Persons established under part A of title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §548, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1674; Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title IV, §404(c), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 94–163, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 871. Part D of title III of the Act is classified generally to part B (§6321 et seq.) of subchapter III of chapter 77 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6201 of this title and Tables.

The Energy Conservation and Production Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 94–385, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1125. Part A of title IV of the Act is classified generally to part A (§6861 et seq.) of subchapter III of chapter 81 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–5 struck out "; provided that 49 percent of the appropriated funds shall be distributed using the definition of eligible unit of local government-alternative 1 in section 17151(3)(A) of this title and 49 percent of the appropriated funds shall be distributed using the definition of eligible unit of local government-alternative 2 in section 17151(3)(B) of this title" after "2012".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Frank Koeperski and Others, Respondents.

Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed. There is no evidence that the complaining witness appeared at the original trial. There is acceptable evidence that he did not appear. A question of fact was thus made for the County Court. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### Milton M. Eisenberg, as a Stockholder, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of Julius Grossman, Inc., Similarly Situated, and in the Right of Julius Grossman, Inc., Respondent, v. Ella Grossman et al., Appellants.

There is no allegation in the complaint complying with section 61 of the General Corporation Law which provides that *“*it must be made to appear that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains ”. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAYMOND HARRY MILEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 18 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2017, in consideration of the Motion to 

Proceed Pro Se and the Petition for Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to 

the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County for that court to determine whether

Petitioner’s current counsel should be granted leave to withdraw. If current counsel is 

permitted to withdraw, the court shall then determine whether Petitioner should be

granted leave to proceed pro se or new counsel should be appointed. The Court of 

Common Pleas of Bucks County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this remand 

within 45 days.
§ 129.3 Requirement to register. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any person who engages in brokering activities (*see* § 129.2) is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Registration under this section is generally a precondition for the issuance of approval for brokering activities required under this part 129 or the use of exemptions.
( b ) *Exemptions.* Registration, approval, recordkeeping, and reporting under this section are not required for: ( 1 ) Foreign governments or international organizations, including their employees, acting in an official capacity; or
( 2 ) Persons exclusively in the business of financing, insuring, transporting, customs brokering, or freight forwarding, whose activities do not extend beyond financing, insuring, transporting, customs brokering, or freight forwarding. Examples include air carriers or freight forwarders that merely transport or arrange transportation for licensed defense articles, and banks or credit companies who merely provide commercially available lines or letters of credit to persons registered or required to register in accordance with parts 122 or 129 of this subchapter. However, banks, firms, or other persons providing financing for defense articles or defense services are required to register under certain circumstances, such as when the bank or its employees are directly involved in arranging transactions involving defense articles or defense services or hold title to defense articles, even when no physical custody of defense articles is involved. In such circumstances, the banks, firms, or other persons providing financing for defense articles or defense services are not exempt.
( c ) Persons exempt from registration, approval, recordkeeping, and reporting as provided in § 129.3(b) are subject to the policy on embargoes and other proscriptions as outlined in § 129.7.
( d ) U.S. persons who are registered as a manufacturer or exporter in accordance with part 122 of this subchapter, including their U.S. or foreign subsidiaries and other affiliates listed on their Statement of Registration who are required to register under this part, are not required to submit a separate broker registration or pay a separate broker registration fee when more than 50 percent of the voting securities are owned by the registrant or such subsidiaries and affiliates are otherwise controlled by the registrant (see § 120.66 of this subchapter), and they are listed and identified as brokers within their manufacturer or exporter Statement of Registration. All other requirements of this part apply to such brokers and their brokering activities.
( e ) Registration under this section is a precondition for the issuance of approval for brokering activities required under this section or the use of exemptions, unless an exception is granted by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
[78 FR 52690, Aug. 26, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 16426, Mar. 23, 2022]
§ 1411.4 Procedure for obtaining information. ( a ) *Foreign Service Labor Relations Board/General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority.* Any person who desires to inspect or copy any records, documents or other information of the Board or the General Counsel, covered by this part, other than those specified in paragraphs (a) (1) and (c) of § 1411.3, shall submit a written request to that effect as follows: ( 1 ) If the request is for records, documents or other information in a regional office of the Authority, it should be made to the appropriate Regional Director;
( 2 ) If the request is for records, documents or other information in the Office of the General Counsel and located in Washington, DC, it should be made to the Freedom of Information Officer, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC; and
( 3 ) If the request is for records, documents or other information in the offices of the Authority in Washington, DC, it should be made to the Solicitor of the Authority, Washington, DC.
( b ) *Foreign Service Impasse Disputes Panel.* Any person who desires to inspect or copy any records, documents or other information of the Panel covered by this part, other than those specified in paragraphs (b) (1) and (c) of § 1411.3, shall submit a written request to that effect to the Executive Director, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Washington, DC.
( c ) All requests under this part should be clearly and prominently identified as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act and, if submitted by mail or otherwise submitted in an envelope or other cover, should be clearly identified as such on the envelope or other cover. If a request does not comply with the provisions of this paragraph, it shall not be deemed received by the appropriate Regional Director, the Freedom of Information Officer of the Office of the General Counsel, the Solicitor of the Authority, or the Executive Director of the Federal Service Impasses Panel, as appropriate, until the time it is actually received by such person.
EX-32.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of TS&B Holdings, Inc., (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, James E. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ James E. JenkinsJames E. Jenkins, President and Chief
Executive Officer May 20, 2004
Q2 2007 Exhibit 10.56






EXHIBIT 10.56



Grant of Options to Non-Employee Directors

On June 27, 2007, Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") granted to each non-employee member of the
Company's Board of Directors, consisting of Messrs. Jere Drummond, Kamran Elahian, Robert C. Hawk and Sam Srinivasan, an option
to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Each of these options was granted under the Company's 1997 Stock
Plan, has an exercise price of $1.97 share and shall vest as to 25% of the shares subject to such option on each of the first four
anniversaries of the date of grant.
DRONE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG

Drone: DJI Phantom 3 Repair man:

Operator: 

Randy Steven 

Dixon

Date Parts What happened? Fixed Not 

Fixed Time RepairmanInitials
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158 

AN ACT 

To confirm full ownership rights for certain United States 

astronauts to artifacts from the astronauts’ space missions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4158 EH

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ARTIFACT. 

2 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘artifact’’ means, 

3 with respect to an astronaut described in section 2(a), any 

4 expendable item utilized in missions for the Mercury, 

5 Gemini, or Apollo programs through the completion of the 

6 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project not expressly required to be re7 turned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administra8 tion at the completion of the mission and other expend9 able, disposable, or personal-use items utilized by such as10 tronaut during participation in any such program. The 

11 term includes personal logs, checklists, flight manuals, 

12 prototype and proof test articles used in training, and dis13 posable flight hardware salvaged from jettisoned lunar 

14 modules. The term does not include lunar rocks and other 

15 lunar material. 

16 SEC. 2. FULL OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—A United States astronaut who 

18 participated in any of the Mercury, Gemini, or Apollo pro19 grams through the completion of the Apollo-Soyuz Test 

20 Project, who received an artifact during his participation 

21 in any such program, shall have full ownership of and 

22 clear title to such artifact. 

23 (b) NO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CLAIM.—The Fed24 eral Government shall have no claim or right to ownership, 

25 control, or use of any artifact in possession of an astro26 naut as described in subsection (a) or any such artifact 
3 

•HR 4158 EH

1 that was subsequently transferred, sold, or assigned to a 

2 third party by an astronaut described in subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158 

AN ACT 

To confirm full ownership rights for certain United 

nauts’ space missions. States astronauts to artifacts from the astro-
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3797 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3797

 To amend chapter 178 of title 28 of the United States Code to permit 
 during a 4-year period States to enact statutes that exempt from the 
 operation of such chapter, lotteries, sweepstakes, and other betting, 
   gambling, or wagering schemes involving professional and amateur 
                                sports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2012

 Mr. LoBiondo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 178 of title 28 of the United States Code to permit 
 during a 4-year period States to enact statutes that exempt from the 
 operation of such chapter, lotteries, sweepstakes, and other betting, 
   gambling, or wagering schemes involving professional and amateur 
                                sports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sports Gaming Opportunity Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 3704(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``or'' at the end,
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, 
        or wagering scheme in a State authorized by such State by an 
        applicable statute--
                    ``(A) enacted on or after January 1, 2012, and
                    ``(B) as in effect not later than January 1, 
                2016.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         581,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,129,000
<PP&E>                                      11,209,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 203,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,533,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,814,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,635,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,532,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,387,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,342,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,342,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,342,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### Dontie S. Mitchell, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 617]

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Hard, J.), entered April 7, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.

Claimant, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules following two disciplinary hearings conducted while he was housed at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Westchester County and a penalty including 71⁄2 months of keeplock was imposed. Claimant served a portion of his keeplock penalty at Sing Sing until his transfer to Upstate Correctional Facility in Franklin County, where he was admitted to the special housing unit (hereinafter SHU). Claimant subsequently commenced this action against defendant, seeking money damages as a result of his alleged wrongful confinement to SHU at Upstate. Claimant alleged that his confinement to SHU was improper because it constituted a more severe punishment than keeplock. He further claimed that the Department of Correctional Services’ interpretation and application of 7 NYCRR 301.6 are irrational and unreasonable. The Court of Claims granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim and claimant now appeals.

Initially, we note that defendant is immune from liability for the actions of employees of the Department of Correctional Services concerning the discipline of inmates if the employees act under the authority of and in compliance with the governing *595statutes and regulations *(see Arteaga v State of New York,*72 NY2d 212, 214, 218-220 [1988]; *Holloway v State of New York,*285 AD2d 765, 765 [2001]). Here, 7 NYCRR 301.6 (a) (2) permits keeplock status inmates to be placed in SHU at Upstate. Moreover, in support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant submitted the affidavit of the Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, which sets forth the logistical concerns underlying the implementation of this provision and provides a reasonable basis for the challenged action. Accordingly, we conclude that the Court of Claims properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.

Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 1203.735-209 Indebtedness.

An employee shall pay each just financial obligation in a proper and timely manner, especially one imposed by law such as Federal, State, or local taxes. For the purpose of this section, a *just financial obligation* means one acknowledged by the employee or reduced to judgement by a court or one imposed by law such as Federal, State, or local taxes, and “in a proper and timely manner” means in a manner which the agency determines does not, under the circumstances, reflect adversely on the Government as the employer. In the event of dispute between an employee and an alleged creditor, this section does not require an agency to determine the validity or amount of the disputed debt.
§ 1005.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
### §285q. Purpose of Institute

The general purpose of the National Institute of Nursing Research (in this subpart referred to as the "Institute") is the conduct and support of, and dissemination of information respecting, basic and clinical nursing research, training, and other programs in patient care research.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, §464V, formerly §483, as added Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 867; renumbered §464V and amended Pub. L. 103–43, title XV, §1511(a)(1), (b)(2), June 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 178, 179.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 287c of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 103–43.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–43, §1511(a)(1) substituted "Institute" for "Center" in section catchline and "National Institute of Nursing Research (in this subpart referred to as the 'Institute')" for "National Center for Nursing Research (hereafter in this subpart referred to as the 'Center')" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study on Adequacy of Number of Nurses

Section 1512 of Pub. L. 103–43 directed Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through Director of National Institute of Nursing Research, to enter into a contract with a public or nonprofit private entity to conduct a study for purpose of determining whether and to what extent there is a need for an increase in the number of nurses in hospitals and nursing homes in order to promote the quality of patient care and reduce the incidence among nurses of work-related injuries and stress and to complete such study and submit a report to Congress not later than 18 months after June 10, 1993.