alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


               Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                                   May 4, 2004



                              THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



               Delaware             001-02217             58-0628465
           (State or other         (Commission           (IRS Employer
             jurisdiction          File Number)        Identification No.)
          of incorporation)



              One Coca-Cola Plaza
                Atlanta, Georgia                            30313
    (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404)676-2121



<PAGE>


Item 5.  Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure

Attached as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference is a copy of a
press release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated May 4, 2004, regarding the naming
of E. Neville Isdell as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Elect.

Item 7(c).        Exhibits

Exhibit 99.1      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated May 4, 2004,
                  regarding the naming of E. Neville Isdell as Chairman and
                  Chief Executive Officer Elect.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                           THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
                                           (REGISTRANT)


Date:  May 5, 2004                         By: /s/ David M. Taggart
                                               --------------------
                                               David M. Taggart
                                               Vice President and Treasurer




<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.
-----------

Exhibit 99.1      Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated May 4, 2004,
                  regarding the naming of E. Neville Isdell as Chairman and
                  Chief Executive Officer.
### §1769j. Ensuring safety of school meals

#### (a) Food and Nutrition Service

Not later than 1 year after December 13, 2010, the Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Food and Nutrition Service, shall—

(1) in consultation with the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service and the Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, develop guidelines to determine the circumstances under which it is appropriate for the Secretary to institute an administrative hold on suspect foods purchased by the Secretary that are being used in school meal programs under this chapter and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.);

(2) work with States to explore ways for the States to increase the timeliness of notification of food recalls to schools and school food authorities;

(3) improve the timeliness and completeness of direct communication between the Food and Nutrition Service and States about holds and recalls, such as through the commodity alert system of the Food and Nutrition Service; and

(4) establish a timeframe to improve the commodity hold and recall procedures of the Department of Agriculture to address the role of processors and determine the involvement of distributors with processed products that may contain recalled ingredients, to facilitate the provision of more timely and complete information to schools.

#### (b) Food Safety and Inspection Service

Not later than 1 year after December 13, 2010, the Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service, shall revise the procedures of the Food Safety and Inspection Service to ensure that schools are included in effectiveness checks.

(June 4, 1946, ch. 281, §29, as added Pub. L. 111–296, title III, §308, Dec. 13, 2010, 124 Stat. 3246.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Child Nutrition Act of 1966, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 89–642, Oct. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 885, which is classified generally to chapter 13A (§1771 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1771 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2010, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 445 of Pub. L. 111–296, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1751 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3932 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3932

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Red 198.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Red 198.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE RED 198.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.99 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 300.305 Excluded contracts.

Notwithstanding the fact that an open contractual commitment described in § 300.300(c) meets the requirements of § 300.301 and the other requirements of these rules, a court shall not be precluded from canceling such commitment, awarding damages, or granting such other remedy as it shall deem fair and equitable if, on application of the trustee or SIPC, it determines that such commitment was not entered into in the ordinary course of business or was entered into by the debtor, or the broker or dealer or his customer, for the purposes of creating a commitment in contemplation of a liquidation proceeding under the Act. Such a determination shall be made after notice and opportunity for hearing by the debtor, such broker or dealer, or such customer, and may be made before or after the delivery of securities or payment of the contract price or before or after any buy-in or sell-out of the open contractual commitment, or otherwise.
From: Culligan, Kevin

Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:11 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Vasu, Amy

Subject: Leakage lookback language

<< interstate effects evaluation language 7-23-15 revised.docx >>DRAFT/DELIBERATIVE

– DO NOT CITE, QUOTE OR DISTRIBUTE

Aside from the possible incentives for leakage addressed in this section, there may be other

potential generation incentives across states and sectors that could increase emissions, particularly in an

environment where various states are implementing a variety of state plan approaches. Some examples

of these incentives, particularly those that were specified by commenters, are discussed in Sec.VIII.L.

That section also describes how the EPA has structured this final rule to either prevent or minimize the

potential for foregone reductions from such incentives. These safeguards include placing restrictions on

interstate trading under rate

‐ based or mass

‐ based approaches when there could be a risk of such

incentives. Additionally, the nature of the CO 2 emission performance rates and state goals help to

minimize these effects, as does the MWh

‐ accounting method for adjusting emission rates under rate

‐

based plans.

However, without a better understanding of the different mechanisms that states may ultimately

choose to meet the 111(d) plan requirements and how different requirements in different states may

interact, EPA cannot project every incentive that could lead to emission increases. Therefore, once

program implementation begins, EPA will assess how emission performance across states may be

affected by the interaction of different regulatory structures implemented through state plans. Based

upon that evaluation, the EPA will determine whether there are potential concerns and what course of

action may be appropriate to remedy such concerns.
• 

2/24/92 SPA 9 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 73 

Testing and Monitoring Activities; Technical Corrections 

55 FR 8948-8950 

March 9,1990 

(Non-HSWA Cluster VI) 

Note: This checklist contains technical corrections tothe final rule addressed byRevision Checklist 67 (54 FR 40260; September 29, 1989). States are encouraged 

toadopt the corrections addressed by this present checklist atthe same time that the Revision Checklist 67 provisions are adopted. 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITAT(ON 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

MORE 

EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL WAC 173-303 

SUBPART B- DEFINITIONS 

REFERENCES 

add alist ofthe 

47 analytical testing 

methods incorporated 

byreference 260.11(a) 110(3)(a) x Note:federal rule nolonger 

• PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 

APPENDIX IIITO PART 261 

contains this list 

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST METHODS 

revise Footnote 'a' 

ofTable 2 Appendix III 

Table 2 

110(3)(f) X 

revise Methods 7081 

and 7420 inTable 3 Appendix III 

Table 3 

110(3)(f) X 

revise Footnote 'a' 

ofTable3 Appendix III 

Table 3 

110(3)(f) X 

• March 9,1990 - Page'1 of1
5343.204-70-7 Plans and Reports

To comply with the Consolidated UCA Management Plan and Semi-annual Consolidated UCA

Management Report requirements described in DFARS 243.204-70-7, SCOs are required to ensure

unpriced change orders with an estimated value exceeding $5 million are input/updated in the UCA

Reporting tool on a semi-annual basis no later than April 10th and October 10th of each year. Special

access program offices will provide the information directly to the cognizant HCA, as appropriate.

Parent topic: Subpart 5343.2 – CHANGE ORDERS
[Cite as Krook v. Miami Univ. , 2010-Ohio-3639.]



# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

MELANIE KROOK

Plaintiff

v.

MIAMI UNIVERSITY

Defendant

Case No. 2009-09515-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT
{¶ 1} 1) On October 28, 2009, a 2006 Honda Civic owned by plaintiff,
Melanie Krook, was damaged as a result of negligence on the part of an employee of defendant, Miami University, in conducting lawn maintenance activity on university
grounds.
{¶ 2} 2) Plaintiff filed this complaint seeking to recover damages in the amount of $208.99, for repl acement parts. The $25.00 f iling fee was paid and plaintiff
requested reimbursement of that cost along with her damage claim.
{¶ 3} 3) Defendant filed an investigation report stating: “The Defendant believes that the Plaintiff has filed a valid claim for items totaling $233.99.”

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
{¶ 4} 1) Defendant was charged with a duty to exercise reasonable care for the protection of plaintiff’s property while performing any maintenance work. Hoelle v.
Miami Univ., Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-06970-AD, 2005-Ohio-4643. In regards to the facts ofthis claim, negligence on the part of defendant has been shown. Rust v. Miami Univ.

, Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-01226-AD, 2005-Ohio-1248; Laux v. Cleveland State Univ. , Ct. of Cl.
No. 2007-01410-AD, 2007-Ohio-2409; Dunlap v. Ohio University , Ct. of Cl. No. 2009-
06010-AD, 2009-Ohio-7081.
{¶ 5} 2) Consequently, defendant is liable to plaintiff for the damaged claimed, $208.99, plus the $25.00 filing fee which may be reimbursed as compensable
costs pursuant to R.C. 2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and

Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990.



# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

MELANIE KROOK

Plaintiff

v.

MIAMI UNIVERSITY

Defendant

Case No. 2009-09515-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth
in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $233.99, whic h includes the filing fee. Court costs areassessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Melanie Krook Paul S. Allen 117 Thomson Hall Miami University Oxford, Ohio 45056 Roudebush Hall Room 14 Oxford, Ohio 45056
RDK/laa 3/5 Filed 3/19/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 8/6/10
# 1831.205-671 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**Subpart 1831.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations
### §19120. Evaluation

#### (a) In general

After the Directorate has been in operation for 6 years, the Director shall enter into an agreement with the National Academies to provide an evaluation of how well the Directorate is achieving the purposes identified in section 19102 of this title.

#### (b) Inclusions

The evaluation shall include—

(1) an assessment of the impact of Directorate activities on the Foundation's primary science mission;

(2) an assessment of the Directorate's impact on the challenges and key technology focus areas under section 19107 of this title;

(3) an assessment of efforts to ensure coordination between the Directorate and other Federal agencies, and with external entities;

(4) a description of lessons learned from operation of the Directorate; and

(5) recommended funding levels for the Directorate;

#### (c) Availability

On completion of the evaluation, the evaluation shall be made available to Congress and the public.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10399A, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1598.)
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3a12-3 Exemption from sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 for securities of certain foreign issuers. ( a ) Securities for which the filing of registration statements on Form 18 [17 CFR 249.218] are authorized shall be exempt from the operation of sections 14 and 16 of the Act.
( b ) Securities registered by a foreign private issuer, as defined in Rule 3b-4 (§ 240.3b-4 of this chapter), shall be exempt from sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Act.
[44 FR 70137, Dec. 6, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 54780, Dec. 6, 1982; 56 FR 30067, July 1, 1991]
#### American News Company, Inc., v. Avon Publishing Co., Inc., et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. The time of the defendants to answer the complaint herein is extended for ten days from the date of the order. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 1041.]
§ 32.2 Commodity option transactions; general authorization. Subject to §§ 32.1, 32.4, and 32.5, which shall in any event apply to all commodity option transactions, it shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to offer to enter into, enter into, confirm the execution of, maintain a position in, or otherwise conduct activity related to any transaction in interstate commerce that is a commodity option transaction, unless: ( a ) Such transaction is conducted in compliance with and subject to the provisions of the Act, including any Commission rule, regulation, or order thereunder, otherwise applicable to any other swap, or
( b ) Such transaction is conducted pursuant to § 32.3.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

May 4, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M160504 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M., 

WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE 

ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 

(OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-15-0157 – Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 

2 and 3)—State of New York Petitions for Review of LBP-13-13 and Associated Board 

Decision on Contention NYS-12C 

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to the State of New York’s 

petitions for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board’s decision in LBP-13-13 to the 

extent that the decision resolved Contention NYS-12C, and an April 1, 2014, Board decision 

that declined to reconsider LBP-13-13 or reopen the hearing record on NYS-12C. The 

Memorandum and Order reverses LBP-13-13, directs further Staff action, and declines to review 

the April 1, 2014, decision. Chairman Burns did not participate in this matter. 

(Subsequently, on May 4, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 165.8 Amount of award. If all of the conditions are met for a whistleblower award in connection with a covered judicial or administrative action or a related action, the Commission will then decide the amount of the award pursuant to the procedure set forth in § 165.7. ( a ) Whistleblower awards shall be in an aggregate amount equal to— ( 1 ) Not less than 10 percent, in total, of what has been collected of the monetary sanctions imposed in the covered judicial or administrative action or related actions; and
( 2 ) Not more than 30 percent, in total, of what has been collected of the monetary sanctions imposed in the covered judicial or administrative action or related actions.
( b ) If the Commission makes awards to more than one whistleblower in connection with the same action or related action, the Commission will determine an individual percentage award for each whistleblower, but in no event will the total amount awarded to all whistleblowers as a group be less than 10 percent or greater than 30 percent of the amount the Commission or the other authorities collect.
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 74 FR 40431, Aug. 11, 2009.

§ 248.8 Revised privacy notices. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as otherwise authorized in this subpart, you must not, directly or through any affiliate, disclose any nonpublic personal information about a consumer to a nonaffiliated third party other than as described in the initial notice that you provided to that consumer under § 248.4, unless: ( 1 ) You have provided to the consumer a clear and conspicuous revised notice that accurately describes your policies and practices;
( 2 ) You have provided to the consumer a new opt out notice;
( 3 ) You have given the consumer a reasonable opportunity, before you disclose the information to the nonaffiliated third party, to opt out of the disclosure; and
( 4 ) The consumer does not opt out.
( b ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise permitted by §§ 248.13, 248.14, and 248.15, you must provide a revised notice before you: ( i ) Disclose a new category of nonpublic personal information to any nonaffiliated third party;
( ii ) Disclose nonpublic personal information to a new category of nonaffiliated third party; or
( iii ) Disclose nonpublic personal information about a former customer to a nonaffiliated third party, if that former customer has not had the opportunity to exercise an opt out right regarding that disclosure.
( 2 ) A revised notice is not required if you disclose nonpublic personal information to a new nonaffiliated third party that you adequately described in your prior notice.
( c ) *Delivery.* When you are required to deliver a revised privacy notice by this section, you must deliver it according to § 248.9.
MP5306.502-4. Annual Competition and Commercial Reporting Requirements.       4.1. SAF/AQCP is responsible for submitting the annual report required by FAR 6.502(b)(2).The procuring activity Competition and Commercial Advocates must provide support as requested in the preparation of the annual report and provide supplementary information at any time in support of requests for information or other tasks regarding competition and the use of commercial practices.    **Parent topic:** MP5306.502 Air Force Competition and Commercial Advocacy Program
5316.603-3  Limitations       See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5316.6 — TIME-AND-MATERIALS, LABOR-HOUR, AND LETTER CONTRACTS
# Subpart 5306.2 - FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

**Parent topic:**Part 5306 - Competition Requirements

## 5306.202 Establishing or Maintaining Alternative Sources

(b)(1) The Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP)/Acquisition Strategy approval authority is authorized to sign and approve the Determination and Findings (D&F) required by FAR 6.202(b)(1).
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.19b-3 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.14 Office of Administrative Law Judges. ( a ) Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551-559) and the federal securities laws, the Office of Administrative Law Judges conducts hearings in proceedings instituted by the Commission. The Administrative Law Judges are responsible for the fair and orderly conduct of the proceedings and have the authority to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) Issue subpoenas;
( 3 ) Rule on offers of proof;
( 4 ) Examine witnesses;
( 5 ) Regulate the course of a hearing;
( 6 ) Hold pre-hearing conferences;
( 7 ) Rule upon motions; and
( 8 ) Unless waived by the parties, prepare an initial decision containing the conclusions as to the factual and legal issues presented, and issue an appropriate order.
( b ) The Chief Administrative Law Judge performs the duties of an Administrative Law Judge under the Administrative Procedure Act and the duties delegated to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by the Commission that are compatible with those duties. The Chief Administrative Law Judge is responsible for the orderly functioning of the Office of Administrative Law Judges apart from the conduct of administrative proceedings and acts as liaison between that Office and the Commission.
[60 FR 14625, Mar. 20, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 9442, Feb. 16, 2021]
### §15041. Purpose

The purpose of this part is to provide for allotments to support a protection and advocacy system (referred to in this part as a "system") in each State to protect the legal and human rights of individuals with developmental disabilities in accordance with this part.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §141, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1712.)