alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Europos Sąjungos L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0723 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | L 199 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Teisės aktai | 61 metai2018m. rugpjūčio 7d. |

ISSN 1977-0723

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

L 199

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Teisės aktai

61 metai2018m. rugpjūčio 7d.

---

| Turinys | | II   Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI |
| | * | Informacija apie Europos Sąjungos ir Norvegijos Karalystės susitarimo dėl administracinio bendradarbiavimo, kovos su sukčiavimu ir reikalavimų vykdymo pridėtinės vertės mokesčio srityje įsigaliojimą | 1 |

Turinys

II   Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai

Puslapis

TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI

*

Informacija apie Europos Sąjungos ir Norvegijos Karalystės susitarimo dėl administracinio bendradarbiavimo, kovos su sukčiavimu ir reikalavimų vykdymo pridėtinės vertės mokesčio srityje įsigaliojimą

1

| LT | Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.
  Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė. |
| --- | --- |

LT

Aktai, kurių pavadinimai spausdinami paprastu šriftu, yra susiję su kasdieniu žemės ūkio reikalų valdymu ir paprastai galioja ribotą laikotarpį.

Visų kitų aktų pavadinimai spausdinami ryškesniu šriftu ir prieš juos dedama žvaigždutė.

---

II Ne teisėkūros procedūra priimami aktai

TARPTAUTINIAI SUSITARIMAI

| 2018 8 7 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2018 8 7

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

L 199/1

---

Informacija apie Europos Sąjungos ir Norvegijos Karalystės susitarimo dėl administracinio bendradarbiavimo, kovos su sukčiavimu ir reikalavimų vykdymo pridėtinės vertės mokesčio srityje įsigaliojimą

2018 m. vasario 6 d. pasirašius Susitarimą, Europos Sąjunga ir Norvegijos Karalystė pranešė viena kitai (atitinkamai 2018 m. liepos 9 d. ir 2018 m. birželio 26 d.), kad Susitarimo (1) 44 straipsnio 1 dalyje nurodytos vidaus teisinės procedūros yra užbaigtos.

1

Susitarimas įsigalioja 2018 m. rugsėjo 1 d. pagal jo 44 straipsnio 2 dalį.

---

(1)  Europos Sąjungos ir Norvegijos Karalystės susitarimas dėl administracinio bendradarbiavimo, kovos su sukčiavimu ir reikalavimų vykdymo pridėtinės vertės mokesčio srityje (OL L 195, 2018 8 1, p. 3).

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.618 Form BD-Y2K, information required of broker-dealers pursuant to section 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and § 240.17a-5 of this chapter.

This form shall be used by every broker-dealer required to file reports under § 240.17a-5(e) of this chapter.

[63 FR 37674, July 13, 1998]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form BD-Y2K, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
§ 37.600 Core Principle 6—Position limits or accountability. ( a ) *In general.* To reduce the potential threat of market manipulation or congestion, especially during trading in the delivery month, a swap execution facility that is a trading facility shall adopt for each of the contracts of the facility, as is necessary and appropriate, position limitations or position accountability for speculators.
( b ) *Position limits.* For any contract that is subject to a position limitation established by the Commission pursuant to section 4a(a) of the Act, the swap execution facility shall: ( 1 ) Set its position limitation at a level no higher than the Commission limitation; and
( 2 ) Monitor positions established on or through the swap execution facility for compliance with the limit set by the Commission and the limit, if any, set by the swap execution facility.
### §1862o–9. Broader impacts merit review criterion

#### (a) In general

Among the types of activities that the Foundation shall consider as appropriate for meeting the requirements of its broader impacts criterion for the evaluation of research proposals are partnerships between academic researchers and industrial scientists and engineers that address research areas identified as having high importance for future national economic competitiveness, such as nanotechnology.

#### (b) Report on broader impacts criterion

Not later than 1 year after August 9, 2007, the Director shall transmit to Congress a report on the impact of the broader impacts grant criterion used by the Foundation. The report shall—

(1) identify the criteria that each division and directorate of the Foundation uses to evaluate the broader impacts aspects of research proposals;

(2) provide a breakdown of the types of activities by division that awardees have proposed to carry out to meet the broader impacts criterion;

(3) provide any evaluations performed by the Foundation to assess the degree to which the broader impacts aspects of research proposals were carried out and how effective they have been at meeting the goals described in the research proposals;

(4) describe what national goals, such as improving undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education, improving kindergarten through grade 12 science and mathematics education, promoting university-industry collaboration, and broadening participation of underrepresented groups, the broader impacts criterion is best suited to promote; and

(5) describe what steps the Foundation is taking and should take to use the broader impacts criterion to improve undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education.

(Pub. L. 110–69, title VII, §7022, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 686.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Act, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 7001 of Pub. L. 110–69, set out as a note under section 1862o of this title.
#### § 37.700 Core Principle 7—Financial integrity of transactions.

The swap execution facility shall establish and enforce rules and procedures for ensuring the financial integrity of swaps entered on or through the facilities of the swap execution facility, including the clearance and settlement of the swaps pursuant to section 2(h)(1) of the Act.
### §§1951 to 1958. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–60, §11, July 29, 1971, 85 Stat. 163

Section 1951, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §1, 66 Stat. 328; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 628, stated Congressional policy on conversion of sea and saline waters and defined "saline water" and "United States". See sections 1959 and 1959g(b) and (d) of this title.

Section 1952, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §2, 66 Stat. 328; June 29, 1955, ch. 227, §1(1), 69 Stat. 198; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 628; Aug. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–118, §1(1), 79 Stat. 509; June 24, 1967, Pub. L. 90–30, §1(b)–(d), 81 Stat. 78, prescribed duties of Secretary of the Interior relating to (a) research and studies for development of processes and methods for converting saline water; (b) research and technical development work for developing processes and plant designs; reports to Congress; and treatment of demonstration projects as test beds; (c) recommendations to Congress for prototype plant; (d) methods for recovery and marketing of byproducts; and (e) economic studies and surveys on water production costs. See sections 1959a and 1959b(b) of this title.

Section 1953, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §3, 66 Stat. 329; June 29, 1955, ch. 227, §1(2), 69 Stat. 198; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 628, provided for powers of Secretary of the Interior. See section 1959c of this title.

Section 1954, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §4, 66 Stat. 329; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 629, provided for coordination or joint conduct of activities with Department of Defense; cooperation with other Federal agencies; and availability to public of resulting information and developments. See section 1959d of this title.

Section 1955, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §5, 66 Stat. 329; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 629, related to disposal of water and byproducts, disposition of moneys and alteration of existing law. See section 1959d(e) and (f) of this title.

Section 1956, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §6, 66 Stat. 329; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 629, provided for reports to President and Congress. See section 1959f of this title.

Section 1957, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §7, 66 Stat. 329; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 629, authorized issuance of rules and regulations. See section 1959e of this title.

Section 1958, acts July 3, 1952, ch. 568, §8, 66 Stat. 329; June 29, 1955, ch. 227, §1(3), 69 Stat. 198; Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–295, §1, 75 Stat. 629; Aug. 11, 1965, Pub. L. 89–118, §1(2), 79 Stat. 509; June 24, 1967, Pub. L. 90–30, §1(a), 81 Stat. 78; Apr. 29, 1968, Pub. L. 90–297, §1, 82 Stat. 110, authorized appropriations. See section 1959h of this title.
Part 5350 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions and the Safety Act       DAFFARS PART 5350 Knowledge Center          *Revised: June 2023*          See PM 22-C-05 Revision 1, *Implementing Guidance: Managing the Effects of Inflation with Existing Contracts*                                       Subpart 5350.1 — GENERAL                                                         5350.101-1 Authority                                                                             Subpart 5350.102 — DELEGATION OF AND LIMITATIONS ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY                                                         5350.102-1-70 Delegations                                                            5350.102-2 Contract Adjustment Boards                                                                             Subpart 5350.103 — CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS                                                         5350.103-5 Processing Cases                                                                             Subpart 5350.104 — RESIDUAL POWERS                                                         5350.104-3 (b)(1) Action on Indemnification Requests    Subpart 5350.1 — GENERAL               5350.101-1 Authority       (b) The authorities, policies, and procedures established in this part are based on the authority of HAF MD 1-10, *Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition)*.Subpart 5350.102 — DELEGATION OF AND LIMITATIONS ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY                    5350.102-1-70 Delegations       (a) The DAS(C) is authorized to deny or approve any request for contract adjustment under FAR 50 and take any action pursuant to FAR 50.103-2(b) or FAR 50.103-2(c), including the authority to modify or release unaccrued obligations of any sort and to extend delivery and performance dates for amounts not exceeding $75,000.5350.102-2 Contract Adjustment Boards       The Department of the Air Force Contract Adjustment Board (DAFCAB) is authorized to deny or approve any request for contract adjustment more than $75,000.Subpart 5350.103 — CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS               5350.103-5 Processing Cases       (a) All requests for relief and all related documents, certifications, correspondence, reports, files, and a proposed memorandum of decision must be forwarded through the SCO for submission to the approving official.         (b) The DAFCAB serves as the exclusive point of contact with other military departments, or other departments or agencies of the Government, relative to the exercise of authority under Public Law 85-804.Subpart 5350.104 — RESIDUAL POWERS               5350.104-3 (b)(1) Action on Indemnification Requests       See the Indemnification Guide for Unusually Hazardous or Nuclear Risks for additional information. Upon completion of all buying activity coordination, the contracting officer must forward the indemnification request through the SCO to the cognizant HCA Workflow to for staffing to the SECAF.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.204 Personnel, fiscal, and service functions.

In the event of the unavailability or incapacity of the appropriate staff officer or his or her successor during emergency conditions, authority to effect temporary appointments of such additional officers and employees, to classify and allocate positions to their proper grades, to issue travel orders, and to effect emergency purchases of supplies, equipment and services shall be exercised by the respective Regional Directors, their deputies, or staff in line of succession, as may be required for the discharge of the lawful duties of the respective offices.

[28 FR 6970, July 9, 1963, as amended at 59 FR 5945, Feb. 9, 1994; 71 FR 33387, June 9, 2006; 73 FR 32225, June 5, 2008]
Part 530 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration       Subpart 530.2 - CAS Program Requirements                                                         530.202 [Reserved]                                                                           530.201-5 Waiver.    **Parent topic:** General Services Administration Acquisition ManualSubpart 530.2 - CAS Program Requirements 	  530.202 [Reserved] 	  530.201-5 Waiver. 		    Submit waiver requests to the Senior Procurement Executive.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00049- CV
In re P aula Jackson
ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM CO MAL CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Henson Filed: F ebrua

ry 25, 2011
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Amended Form 8-A replaces former Form 8-C; see § 249.208a of this chapter.

#### § 249.210b [Reserved]
From: Susan Miller [ mailto:SMiller@bia.org ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:22 AM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: Agenda

As I said on the phone, we would like to focus this meeting on:

1. Mercury

a. Test methods and data manipulation

b. Alternative approaches and subcategorization

2. Non

- mercury metals

a. Floor calculations

b. Alternatives

3. Technical memo questions

We would love for Barrett Parker to be there, as well as anyone else who can explain the data

manipulations.

Thanks...

I will pull up the email that asks for info on the people coming and respond to that one

- so I give

you all the info you need.

sus

Susan J Miller

Vice President, Environment, Health & Safety

Brick Industry Associa tion

311 South Academy Street

Cary, North Carolina 27511

919 380

- 2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn

something new.

- Dalai Lama
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Smart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Robert Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  January 13, 2010





/s/  Robert Saunders





Robert Saunders


Chief Executive Officer & President
### §19173. Opportunities for online education

#### (a) In general

The Director shall make competitive awards to institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations (or a consortium thereof, which may include a private sector partner) to conduct research on online STEM education courses for rural communities.

#### (b) Research areas

The research areas eligible for funding under this subsection shall include—

(1) evaluating the learning and achievement of rural students in prekindergarten through grade 12 in STEM subjects;

(2) understanding how computer-based and online professional development courses and mentor experiences can be integrated to meet the needs of educators, principals, and other school leaders of rural students in prekindergarten through grade 12;

(3) combining computer-based and online STEM education and training with mentoring and other applied learning arrangements;

(4) leveraging online programs to supplement STEM studies for rural students that need physical and academic accommodation; and

(5) any other activity the Director determines will accomplish the goals of this subsection.

#### (c) Evaluations

All proposals for awards under this section shall include an evaluation plan that includes the use of outcome-oriented measures to assess the impact and efficacy of the award. Each recipient of an award under this subsection shall include results from these evaluative activities in annual and final projects.

#### (d) Accountability and dissemination

#### (1) Evaluation required

The Director shall evaluate the portfolio of awards made under this subsection. Such evaluation shall—

(A) use a common set of benchmarks and tools to assess the results of research conducted under such awards and identify best practices; and

(B) to the extent practicable, integrate findings from activities carried out pursuant to research conducted under this section, with respect to the pursuit of careers and degrees in STEM, with those activities carried out pursuant to other research on serving rural students and communities.

#### (2) Report on evaluations

Not later than 180 days after the completion of the evaluation under paragraph (1), the Director shall submit to Congress and make widely available to the public a report that includes—

(A) the results of the evaluation; and

(B) any recommendations for administrative and legislative action that could optimize the effectiveness of the awards made under this section.

#### (e) Coordination

In carrying out this section, the Director shall, for purposes of enhancing program effectiveness and avoiding duplication of activities, consult, cooperate, and coordinate with the programs and policies of other relevant Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, §10513, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1617.)
### §2017b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 26, 1962, Pub. L. 87–701, §104, 76 Stat. 601, which authorized appropriations for the Atomic Energy Commission for restoration or replacement of facilities, was from an Act authorizing appropriations for the Atomic Energy Commission, and was not enacted as part of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter. See section 2017(c) of this title.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation authorization acts:

Sept. 26, 1961, Pub. L. 87–315, §104, 75 Stat. 678.

May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–457, §104, 74 Stat. 122.

June 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–50, §104, 73 Stat. 83.

Aug. 4, 1958, Pub. L. 85–590, 72 Stat. 493.

Aug. 21, 1957, Pub. L. 85–162, title I, §104, 71 Stat. 406.

May 3, 1956, ch. 233, §104, 70 Stat. 129.

July 11, 1955, ch. 304, §104, 69 Stat. 293.
§ 37.402 Additional requirements for physical-delivery swaps. For physical-delivery swaps, the swap execution facility shall demonstrate that it: ( a ) Monitors a swap's terms and conditions as they relate to the underlying commodity market; and
( b ) Monitors the availability of the supply of the commodity specified by the delivery requirements of the swap.
110 STAT. 3824 PUBLIC LAW 104–315—OCT. 19, 1996

Public Law 104–315

104th Congress

An Act

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement for

annual resident review for nursing facilities under the Medicaid program and

to require resident reviews for mentally ill or mentally retarded residents when

there is a significant change in physical or mental condition.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL RESIDENT

REVIEW FOR MENTALLY ILL AND MENTALLY RETARDED

NURSING FACILITY RESIDENTS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1919(e)(7) of the Social Security Act

(42 U.S.C. 1396r(e)(7)) is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (B)—

(A) by striking ‘‘ANNUAL’’ in the heading, and

(B) by striking clause (iii); and

(2) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking ‘‘ANNUAL’’ in the

heading.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW IN CASE OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGE

IN PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITION OF MENTALLY ILL

OR MENTALLY RETARDED NURSING FACILITY

RESIDENTS.

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR NOTIFICATION OF STATE AUTHORITY.—

Section 1919(b)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

1396r(b)(3)(E)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘In addition, a nursing facility shall notify the State mental health

authority or State mental retardation or developmental disability

authority, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in

the physical or mental condition of a resident who is mentally

ill or mentally retarded.’’.

(b) REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW.—Section 1919(e)(7)(B) of such

Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(e)(7)(B)), as amended by section 1(a)(1), is

amended by inserting after clause (ii) the following new clause:

42 USC 1396r

note.

Oct. 19, 1996

[H.R. 3632]
PUBLIC LAW 104–315—OCT. 19, 1996 110 STAT. 3825

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3632:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–817 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

‘‘(iii) REVIEW REQUIRED UPON CHANGE IN

RESIDENT’S CONDITION.—A review and determination

under clause (i) or (ii) must be conducted promptly

after a nursing facility has notified the State mental

health authority or State mental retardation or

developmental disability authority, as applicable,

under subsection (b)(3)(E) with respect to a mentally

ill or mentally retarded resident, that there has been

a significant change in the resident’s physical or mental

condition.’’.

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section

shall apply to changes in physical or mental condition occurring

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Approved October 19, 1996.

42 USC 1396r

note.