alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1886a. Data on specific fields of study

The National Science Foundation shall continue to collect statistically reliable data on the field of degree of college-educated individuals to fulfill obligations under section 1863(j)(1) of this title and the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act [42 U.S.C. 1885 et seq.]. If the Director of the Foundation determines that there is a legal impediment to the continued collection of this data, he shall inform the Committee on Science of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate not later than 180 days after December 30, 2005.

(Pub. L. 109–155, title VII, §721, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2938.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act, referred to in text, is Part B of Pub. L. 96–516, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3010, which enacted sections 1885 to 1885d of this title and provisions set out as notes under sections 1861 and 1885 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1980 Amendment note set out under section 1861 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section, formerly classified to section 16831 of this title, was transferred following the enactment of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314.

Section was enacted as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
#### § 306.9 Recordkeeping.

You must keep for one year any delivery tickets or letters of certification on which you based your automotive fuel rating certifications. You must also keep for one year records of any automotive fuel rating determinations you made according to § 306.5. They must be available for inspection by Federal Trade Commission and Environmental Protection Agency staff members, or by persons authorized by FTC or EPA.

[58 FR 41374, Aug. 3, 1993]
### §17511. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17511 was editorially reclassified as section 60511 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty’s Treasury, Respondent, v. Bankers Trust Company of New York, Defendant. Robert W. Maitland-Tennent, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 571.]
§ 229.908 (Item 908) Reasons for and alternatives to the roll-up transaction. ( a ) Describe the reason(s) for the roll-up transaction.
( b ) ( 1 ) If the general partner or sponsor considered alternatives to the roll-up transaction being proposed, describe such alternative(s) and state the reason(s) for their rejection.
( 2 ) Whether or not described in response to paragraph (b)(1) of this Item (§ 229.908), describe in reasonable detail the potential alternative of continuation of the partnerships in accordance with their existing business plans, including the effects of such continuation and the material risks and benefits that likely would arise in connection therewith, and, if applicable, the general partner's reasons for not considering such alternative.
( 3 ) Whether or not described in response to paragraph (b)(1) of this Item (§ 229.908), describe in reasonable detail the potential alternative of liquidation of the partnerships, the procedures required to accomplish liquidation, the effects of liquidation, the material risks and benefits that likely would arise in connection with liquidation, and, if applicable, the general partner's reasons for not considering such alternative.
( c ) State the reasons for the structure of the roll-up transaction and for undertaking such transaction at this time.
( d ) State whether the general partner initiated the roll-up transaction and, if not, whether the general partner participated in the structuring of the transaction.
( e ) State whether the general partner recommends the roll-up transaction and briefly describe the reasons for such recommendation.
### §14323. Requirements

#### (a) Batteries subject to certain regulations

The collection, storage, or transportation of used rechargeable batteries, batteries described in section 14302(5)(C) of this title or in subchapter III, and used rechargeable consumer products containing rechargeable batteries that are not easily removable rechargeable batteries, shall, notwithstanding any law of a State or political subdivision thereof governing such collection, storage, or transportation, be regulated under applicable provisions of the regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency at 60 Fed. Reg. 25492 (May 11, 1995), as effective on May 11, 1995, except as provided in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) and except that—

(1) the requirements of 40 CFR 260.20, 260.40, and 260.41 and the equivalent requirements of an approved State program shall not apply, and

(2) this section shall not apply to any lead acid battery managed under 40 CFR 266 subpart G or the equivalent requirements of an approved State program.

#### (b) Enforcement under Solid Waste Disposal Act

(1) Any person who fails to comply with the requirements imposed by subsection (a) of this section may be subject to enforcement under applicable provisions of the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.].

(2) States may implement and enforce the requirements of subsection (a) if the Administrator finds that—

(A) the State has adopted requirements that are identical to those referred to in subsection (a) governing the collection, storage, or transportation of batteries referred to in subsection (a); and

(B) the State provides for enforcement of such requirements.

(Pub. L. 104–142, title I, §104, May 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 1335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Solid Waste Disposal Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is title II of Pub. L. 89–272, Oct. 20, 1965, 79 Stat. 997, as amended generally by Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2795, which is classified generally to chapter 82 (§6901 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6901 of this title and Tables.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
STEVEN C AB ASA,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. C ITY AND C OUNTY OF HONOLULU, De pa rtm e nt of Environm e nta l Se rvic e s ; e t a l., De fe nda

n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 15-16597 D.C . No. 1:14-c v-00080-DKW -R LP
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii De rric k Ka

ha la W atson, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 16, 2018 * * Honolulu, Ha

wa ii B e fore : O’ SC A

N NLAIN, C L IFTON, a

nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Ste ve n C a ba sa a ppe a ls the distric t c o urt’ s orde r granting sum m ary judgm e nt to the C i ty

and C ounty

of Honolulu, De

pa rtm e nt of Environm e n ta l Se rvic e s (the



# FIL ED FEB 21 2018 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).C ity ) on his c la im tha t the C ity re ta lia te d a ga inst him

for prote c te d c o n duc t

in viola tion of theHa

wa ii W h istle blowe r Prote c t ion Ac t (HW PA), Haw. R e v. Stat. § 378-62. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. It is undispute d tha

t a c andida te for the W a ste wate r Pum p ing Ope ra tions Supe rvisor position m

ust re c e ive at le a st a 70% sc ore on the prom otiona l
e xam ination to bec onside re d for the position a nd tha t C a ba sa re c e ive d a

57.5%
sc ore on the e xam inat ion. Ac c ordingly , the re is no ge nuine issue of m ate ria l fa c t that the C ity would not ha

ve prom ote d C a

b a sa “ re ga rdle ss of the prote c te d
a c tivity
. ” C

rosby v . State De p’t of Budge t & Fin. , 76 Ha w. 332, 342 (1994) (quoting N

LRB v . How ard Ele c . C

o. , 873 F.2d 1287, 1290 (9th C ir. 1989)). AFFIRM E D.

2
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3923 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other made up articles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain other made up 

articles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER MADE UP ARTICLES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Other made up articles, including dress patterns, other, 

other, (dyed cotton fabric 

with pinked edges, 2′′ w x 8′′ 

l) (provided for in subheading 

6307.90.98) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3923 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 400 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 400

To require certain warning labels to be placed on video games that are 
             given certain ratings due to violent content.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2011

  Mr. Baca (for himself and Mr. Wolf) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require certain warning labels to be placed on video games that are 
             given certain ratings due to violent content.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION REGULATION.

    (a) Regulation.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall 
promulgate regulations to require the warning label described in 
subsection (b) to be placed on the packaging of any video game that is 
rated T (Teen) or higher by the Electronics Software Ratings Board.
    (b) Warning Label Content.--The warning label required under a 
regulation issued under subsection (a) shall be placed in a clear and 
conspicuous location on the packaging of the applicable video game and 
shall state: ``WARNING: Excessive exposure to violent video games and 
other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior.''.
    (c) Video Game Defined.--As used in this Act, the term ``video 
game'' means any product, whether distributed electronically or through 
a tangible device, consisting of data, programs, routines, 
instructions, applications, symbolic languages, or similar electronic 
information (collectively referred to as ``software'') that controls 
the operation of a computer or telecommunication device and that 
enables a user to interact with a computer controlled virtual 
environment for entertainment purposes.
                                 <all>
```
MARK WtilTE 

Attorney General 

The Attorney General of Texas 

March 26, 1980 

Honorable George Kirkpatrick, Jr. 

District Attorney 

Hardin County Courthouse 

Kountze, Texas 77625 

Opinion No. MN-155 

Re: Validity of city’s use of 

county landfiil garbage dump when 

the county has contracted with city 

councilmen to operate the dump. 

Dear Mr. KirQatrick: 

You have requested our opinion concerning the use by the City of 

Kountze, Texas, of a county landfill garbage dump when the county has 

contracted with two Kountze city councilmen to operate the dump. The 

contract between the county and the city councilmen provides that, in 

addition to certain payments from the county, the councilmen are 

authorized to charge certain fees from users of the dump. Under this 

contract the fees are paid to and retained by the councilmen Since the 

effective date of this contract the City of Kountze has utilized this dump 

and incurred stistantial user fees which have not been paid 

Article 988, V.T.C.S., provides, in part: “No member of the city 

council . . . shall be directly or indirectly interested in any work, businem or 

contract, the expense, price or consideration of which is paid from the city 

treasury. . . .I’ 

Whether ‘a municipal official has an unlawful interest in a municipal 

contract is ordinarily a question of fact. Meyers v. Walker, 276 S.W. 305 

(Tex. Civ. App. - Eastland 1325, no writ). Texas Anchor Fence Co. v. City 

of San Antonio, 71 S.W. 391 (Tex. Civ. App. 1902, no wrtt). However, since 

the user fees from the city would be paid directly to the councilmen, this 

obligation is clearly prohibited by article 998, V.T.C.S., and is void as 

against public policy. City of Edinburg v. Ellis, 59 S.W.2d 99(Tex. Comm’n 

App. 1933, holding approved); Attorney General Opinion MW-34 (1979). The 

authority of the city to contract for landfill usage may also be subject to 

competitive bidding. See article 2368a, V.T.C.S.; Attorney General Opinion 

MW-91 (1979). While-e city may not pay user fees which directly or 

indirectly accrue to the benefit of the city councilmen, it may contract for 

landfill services with the county. Article 4413(32c), V.T.C.S. 

P- 499 
, 

Honorable George Kirkpatrick, Jr. - Page Two (MW-155) 

SUMMARY 

A city cannot pay user fees to city councilmen who operate a 

county landfill dump under contract with the county. 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Jim Allison 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

David B. Brooks 

Walter Davis 

Bob Gammage 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Y oungblood 

P- 500
#### Belle Helvitz, Professionally Known as Belle Herbert, Appellant, v. Fred J. Balshofer, Respondent.

Order modified by adding at the end of the 2d paragraph of the order appealed from the words “ except the fourth defense; ” and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
548.101 General.

GSA Order PBS 8050.1, Public Buildings Service Value Engineering Programs provides guidance on

using value engineering.

Parent topic: Subpart 548.1 - Policies and Procedures
### §16093. Fuel cell school buses

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a program for entering into cooperative agreements—

(1) with private sector fuel cell bus developers for the development of fuel cell-powered school buses; and

(2) subsequently, with not less than 2 units of local government using natural gas-powered school buses and such private sector fuel cell bus developers to demonstrate the use of fuel cell-powered school buses.

#### (b) Cost sharing

The non-Federal contribution for activities funded under this section shall be not less than—

(1) 20 percent for fuel infrastructure development activities; and

(2) 50 percent for demonstration activities and for development activities not described in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Reports to Congress

Not later than 3 years after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report that—

(1) evaluates the process of converting natural gas infrastructure to accommodate fuel cell-powered school buses; and

(2) assesses the results of the development and demonstration program under this section.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2006 through 2009.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VII, §743, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 826.)
### §17617. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17617 was editorially reclassified as section 21117 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §15342. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15342 was editorially reclassified as section 20942 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
Subpart 548.1 - Policies and Procedures

Parent topic: Part 548 - Value Engineering

548.101 General.

GSA Order PBS 8050.1, Public Buildings Service Value Engineering Programs provides guidance on

using value engineering.
### §15406. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15406 was editorially reclassified as section 21006 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2019-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.





/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2019-AMarch 24, 2022
Schedule of Change of Control Agreements



 Exhibit 10.14 
  
 Change of Control Agreements in effect as of January 13, 2006 
  
 1 Year Agreements 
  
 Linda Breard 
 Eric Q. Broderson 
 John Chamberlain 
 Randall Hollis 
 Kevin Honeycutt 
 Don Martella 
 Jonathan E. Otis 
 Yves Roumier 
 Scott A. Roza 
 Paul G. Rutherford 
 Richard S. Sato 
 Christopher S. Willis 
  
 2 Year Agreements 
  
 William C. Britts 
 Lisa A. Clarke 

Jon W. Gacek 
  
 3 Year Agreements 
  
 Charles H.
Stonecipher 
 Peter H. van Oppen
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.7a-20 Riders; inserts.

Riders shall not be used. If the application, statement or report is typed on a printed form, and the space provided for the answer to any given item is insufficient, reference shall be made in such space to a full insert page or pages on which the item number and item shall be restated and a complete answer given.
#### § 270.12d2-1 Definition of insurance company for purposes of sections 12(d)(2) and 12(g) of the Act.

For purposes of sections 12(d)(2) and 12(g) of the Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-12(d)(2) and 80a-12(g)], *insurance company* shall include a foreign insurance company as that term is used in rule 3a-6 under the Act (17 CFR 270.3a-6).

[56 FR 56300, Nov. 4, 1991]
#### In the Matter of Moses Tropper, an Alleged Incompetent Person. Joseph Tropper, Appellant; Rega Tropper et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
5326.203 TRANSITION OF WORK

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5326.2 — MAJOR DISASTER OF EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES
### §§17811, 17812. Repealed or Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17811, Pub. L. 110–422, title X, §1002, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4806, which related to maintenance and upgrade of NASA Center facilities, was repealed in part and omitted in part. Subsec. (a) was repealed and reenacted as section 31502 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314, §§3, 6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3328, 3444, which Act enacted Title 51. Subsec. (b), which required determination of maintenance and upgrade backlog at NASA Centers and facilities, and subsec. (c), which required report to Congress to be delivered concurrently with fiscal 2011 budget request, were omitted from the Code following the enactment of Title 51.

Section 17812, Pub. L. 110–422, title X, §1003, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4807, which related to assessment of NASA laboratory capabilities, was repealed in part and omitted in part. Subsec. (a) was repealed and reenacted as section 31503 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314, §§3, 6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3328, 3444, which Act enacted Title 51. Subsec. (b), which required independent external review of NASA laboratories and report to congressional committees no later than 18 months after Oct. 15, 2008, was omitted from the Code following the enactment of Title 51.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of Muzinich BDC, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey Youle, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Jeffrey Youle    | 
|-------------------- | 
|Name: Jeffrey Youle  | 
|Date: March 30, 2022 |