alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this Form 10-K/A into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-14455, 33-38045, 33-53796,
33-52533, 33-59040, 33-59217, 33-63703, 333-02987) and on Form S-3 (File No.
33-56441).


                                   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


San Antonio, Texas
May 13, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30894

Summary Calendar

PATRICK PRICE; BETHANY PRICE; AARON PRICE; KELDA PRICE;

KELVIN WELLS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

DONNA WALLETTE; JEAN HARTLEY; WAYNE MESSINA; JOHN

DILWOTH; EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:10-CV-323

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Over the past four years these plaintiffs have had difficulties with the

school to which their children attend. Twice they have attempted to resolve

their difficulties by bringing suit in federal court. Unfortunately for them this

is not where their problems can be solved. Federal courts are given only limited

authority. They cannot investigate complaints by citizens who think they have

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 2, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30894 Document: 00511775717 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/02/2012
No. 11-30894

been mistreated. Only where federal law permits it and the complaining party

follows federal procedure can the federal court act to help the parties. Most

personal injuries that justify court action have to go to state courts which have

much broader authority to act upon what we call tort claims.

The entire record of the present case has been read and nothing that has

been said presents a legal claim for federal court. Even if the children have been

unfairly treated and even if the school authorities have not satisfied the parents

about the problem, there is no specific act of racial discrimination set forth here. 

The plaintiffs may have concluded that racial animosity existed but that does

not activate the federal court. Specific conduct must be stated that, if true,

would establish that racial discrimination motivated the adverse treatment. 

And there is no legal action of this nature authorized by some of the laws named

by the pleadings. Judge Brady has explained this to the plaintiffs and they

should need no further attention. This judgment was correct and it is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-30894 Document: 00511775717 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/02/2012
Exhibit 10.5 to Viper Powersports, Inc. Form 10-SB12G/Amendment 1







Exhibit 10.5 


RACING PARTNERS MANAGEMENT INC. CONSULTING AGREEMENT 



Agreement made this 15th of March 2004 by and between Viper Motorcycle
Company with principal offices located at 5733 International Parkway, New Hope, Minnesota 55428 USA, (the “Company”) and
Racing Partners Management, Inc. located at 5507 Malibu Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55331 USA, (the “Consultant”).



WITNESSETH 


        WHEREAS, the Consultant
reviews all manufacturing and development plans and directs all aspects of the organization’s objectives, and initiatives to
bring the Company's production plans to fruition. 


        WHEREAS, the Company desires
to utilize the services of the Consultant in connection with its business. 


        WHEREAS, this agreement
supercedes any previous understanding between the two parties, written or oral. 


        NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 



	  	 1. 	  	The Company agrees to a Consultant agreement with Consultant for a
period of three months. 






	  	  	 A. 	  	The Company agrees to pay Consultant semi-monthly payments of
$4,500 until the agreement terminates on June 15, 2004. Said payments under this agreement total $27,000. 






	  	  	 B. 	  	The Company agrees to provide comprehensive medical insurance for
Consultant and his family. 






	  	  	 C. 	  	The Company will reimburse Consultant for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses. 






	  	 2. 	  	The term of this agreement shall be three months commencing on
March 15, 2004. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern this agreement. 






	  	 3. 	  	Consultant shall agree to lock 800,250 shares owned by Consultant
in the lockup agreement for Directors, Officers, and key Shareholders as required by Viper’s underwriter of its initial
public offering. 






	  	 4. 	  	Consultant agrees to perform faithfully, industriously, and to the
best of his ability, experience, and talents, all of the duties that may be required by the express and implicit terms of this
Agreement, to the reasonable satisfaction of Viper. Such duties shall be provided at such place(s) as the needs, business, or
opportunities of Viper may require from time to time. 






	  	 5. 	  	Consultant can terminate this agreement at any time and by the
Company with cause. 






	  	 6. 	  	Consultant shall keep all Company information, trade secrets,
vendor contracts, and any other information material to the Company strictly confidential at all times. 







	By:  	  	/s/   John L. Fiebelkorn 

Chief Executive Officer, Viper Motorcycle Company 







	By:  	  	/s/   John Silseth 

Racing Partners Management, Inc.
### §1411b. Repealed. Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1029, title IV, §401(b), 70 Stat. 1103

Section, acts July 5, 1952, ch. 578, title I, §101, 66 Stat. 403; July 31, 1953 ch. 302 title I, §101, 67 Stat. 307, limited number of housing units to be constructed during fiscal year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Global Positioning System will meet in closed session on January 13, 2005, at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA. The Task Force will review a range of issues dealing with Galileo (or some other future radio navigation satellite system) and provide recommendations to address these issues.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will address: Provision of capabilities and services within GPS to ensure its viability in commercial markets; the impact on frequency spectrum use, signal waveforms and power management; access and denial issues throughout the spectrum of conflict; possible alternatives to a global radio navigation system including the development of small compact timing devices and/or navigation units; and vulnerabilities and upgrade strategies for all global radio navigation satellite systems (GRNSS). In addition, the Task Force will assess areas in which DoD should seek strong partnering relationships outside DoD, both within government and industry. It will recommend research and development areas that are uniquely in DoD interest and might not be accomplished by the private sector.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: December 6, 2004.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-27124 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 2, 2014

N o. 04

- 12

- 00630

- CV

THE HUFF ENERGY FUND, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R."Bill" Huff, Rick D'Angelo, Ed Dartley, Bryan Bloom, and Riley

- Huff Energy Group, LLC, Appellant s

v.

LONGVIEW ENERGY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 09

- 12583

- ZCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants The Huff Energy Fund, L.P. and WRH Energy Partners L.L.C.'s unopposed first motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to May 28, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Ju stice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk o f Court
#### Catherine Hayes, Respondent, v. Edmond J. Hayes, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4025 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4025

 To provide that the Secretary of the Interior may accept bids on any 
  new oil and gas leases of Federal lands (including submerged lands) 
only from bidders certifying that all natural gas produced pursuant to 
 such leases shall be offered for sale only in the United States, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2012

 Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Holt) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that the Secretary of the Interior may accept bids on any 
  new oil and gas leases of Federal lands (including submerged lands) 
only from bidders certifying that all natural gas produced pursuant to 
 such leases shall be offered for sale only in the United States, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep American Natural Gas Here 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NO FOREIGN SALES OF NATURAL GAS PRODUCED ON FEDERAL LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior may accept bids on any new oil and 
gas leases of Federal lands (including submerged lands) under the 
Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) or the Outer Continental 
Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) only from bidders certifying 
that all natural gas produced pursuant to such leases shall be offered 
for sale only in the United States.

SEC. 3. NO FOREIGN SALES OF NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTED OVER FEDERAL 
              PIPELINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY.

    Section 28(a) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 185(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) A new right-of-way for a natural gas pipeline may not be 
granted under this section unless the applicant for the right-of-way 
certifies that all natural gas that is transported via such pipeline 
shall be offered for sale only in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 23.411-23.429 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.0-3 Definition of “rules and regulations” as used in certain sections of the Act. ( a ) The term *rules and regulations* as used in section 305 of the Act shall include the forms for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 and the related instructions thereto, and the forms for information, documents and statements under section 305 of the Act.
( b ) The term *rules and regulations* as used in section 307 of the Act shall include the forms for applications under section 307 of the Act and the related instructions thereto.
[21 FR 1046, Feb. 15, 1956]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

TROY DOUGLAS BRIMM,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 09-10460

 09-10461

D.C. Nos. 1:99-cr-05342-OWW

 1:96-cr-05180-OWW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

Troy Douglas Brimm appeals from the amended judgment imposing a sixmonth sentence following revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Brimm’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

FILED

OCT 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10460

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. We construe the letter filed on June 11, 2010, as a pro se supplemental brief. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**794**
**KA 13-00500**

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LESTER A. BRAXTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), rendered June 7, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and driving while intoxicated.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.03 [3]) and driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256). We agree with defendant that County Court’s statement to defendant that, “by pleading guilty, [he would] give up the right to allege the police unlawfully collected evidence or did anything else illegal” was misleading to the extent that it improperly implied that defendant’s right to challenge the court’s suppression ruling on appeal was automatically extinguished upon the entry of his guilty plea ( see generally People v Moyett , 7 NY3d 892, 892-893; People v Williams , 49 AD3d 1281, 1282, lv denied 10 NY3d 940). Nevertheless, we conclude that “ ‘County Court’s plea colloquy, together with the written waiver of the right to appeal, adequately apprised defendant that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty’ ” ( People v Arney , 120 AD3d 949, 949; see People v Ramos , 7 NY3d 737, 738; Williams , 49 AD3d at 1282). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the court’s suppression ruling ( see People v Kemp , 94 NY2d 831, 833), and his challenge to the severity of the bargained-for sentence ( see Lopez , 6**-2- 794**
**KA 13-00500**

NY3d at 255).

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sovereign Exploration Associates
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  | Sovereign
    Exploration Associates International, Inc..
    BY: /s/ Robert D. Baca
    Robert D. Baca, Chief Executive Officer
    February 21, 2006
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0100:  Staff Review and Response to National Academy of Sciences Study of the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety and Security of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants

Accession Number: ML16188A296

Date Released: Monday, September 12, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16188A300 - SECY-16-0100:  National Academy of Sciences Study of the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety and Security of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (4 page(s), 8/24/2016)
    - ML16188A303 - SECY-16-0100:  Enclosure  - Staff Review and Response to National Academy of Sciences Study of the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety and Security of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (23 page(s), 8/24/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §2000gg–5. Relationship to other laws

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed—

(1) to invalidate or limit the powers, remedies, and procedures under any Federal law or law of any State or political subdivision of any State or jurisdiction that provides greater or equal protection for individuals affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; or

(2) by regulation or otherwise, to require an employer-sponsored health plan to pay for or cover any particular item, procedure, or treatment or to affect any right or remedy available under any other Federal, State, or local law with respect to any such payment or coverage requirement.

#### (b) Rule of construction

This chapter is subject to the applicability to religious employment set forth in section 2000e–1(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. II, §107, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 6089.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Dec. 29, 2022, see section 109 of div. II of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a note under section 2000gg of this title.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51279 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FIDEL RODELA-MARTINEZ, also known as Julio Chavira-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-675-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fidel RodelaMartinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
#### Meyer Nitzberg, Respondent, v. Morris Goodman, Appellant.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, J J.
#### Irving Litter et al., Respondents, v. Charles Klapow, Defendant, and Ogdis Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

In an action brought for the return of certain stock alleged to have been deposited by plaintiffs with appellants as collateral security for certain indebtedness, which are alleged to have been repaid, the appeal is from so much of an order as denies appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Whether the transfer of the stock was outright or merely as collateral security, the amount of the loans for which the stock was allegedly deposited as security, and whether such loans have been repaid, are questions which should be determined on a trial. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Federal resources on missingand exploited children [electronic resource] : a directory for law enforcementand other public and private agencies.**
 
2001 | 2004 | 2007 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:PR 42.8:C 43/R 31/
Item Number:0851-J (online) | 0851-J-16(online)
CGP systemNumber:000603252
 
September 27, 2018