alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2000e–15. Presidential conferences; acquaintance of leadership with provisions for employment rights and obligations; plans for fair administration; membership

The President shall, as soon as feasible after July 2, 1964, convene one or more conferences for the purpose of enabling the leaders of groups whose members will be affected by this subchapter to become familiar with the rights afforded and obligations imposed by its provisions, and for the purpose of making plans which will result in the fair and effective administration of this subchapter when all of its provisions become effective. The President shall invite the participation in such conference or conferences of (1) the members of the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, (2) the members of the Commission on Civil Rights, (3) representatives of State and local agencies engaged in furthering equal employment opportunity, (4) representatives of private agencies engaged in furthering equal employment opportunity, and (5) representatives of employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies who will be subject to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title VII, §716(c), July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 266.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11197

Ex. Ord. No. 11197, eff. Feb. 5, 1965, 30 F.R. 1721, which established the President's Council on Equal Opportunity, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 11247, eff. Sept. 24, 1965, 30 F.R. 12327, formerly set out as a note under section 2000d–1 of this title.
§ 275.206(4)-8 Pooled investment vehicles. ( a ) *Prohibition.* It shall constitute a fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act, practice, or course of business within the meaning of section 206(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-6(4)) for any investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle to: ( 1 ) Make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle; or
( 2 ) Otherwise engage in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle.
( b ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section “pooled investment vehicle” means any investment company as defined in section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(a)) or any company that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act but for the exclusion provided from that definition by either section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1) or (7)).
[72 FR 44761, Aug. 9, 2007]
Exhibit 5.1


January 21, 1998

The Clorox Company
1221 Broadway
Oakland, California  92612-1888

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This opinion is given with respect to the Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement"), 
to which this opinion is an exhibit, to be filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") 
in connection with the registration under the Securities 
Act of 1933, as amended, of an aggregate of 100,000 
shares of Clorox Common Stock which may be issued pursuant 
to The Clorox Company Independent Directors' Stock-Based 
Compensation Plan (the "Plan").

I have examined the Registration Statement and the Clorox 
Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Plan, as well as the 
proceedings taken by you in connection with the adoption 
of the Plan and the authorization of the issuance of the 
Common Stock and such documents as I have deemed necessary 
to render this opinion.

Based upon the forgoing, it is my opinion that:

1.  All necessary corporate action has been duly taken to 
adopt said Plan, and no approval of the Plan by the 
stockholders of The Clorox Company was necessary in 
connection therewith.     

2.  Said 100,000 shares of Clorox Common Stock have been reserved 
for purposes of said Plan and such shares, when issued in 
accordance with the terms and conditions of said Plan, will 
be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Commission 
as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.  

Very truly,



/s/EDWARD A. CUTTER
Edward A. Cutter
Senior Vice President - 
General Counsel and
Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 260.7a-29 Incorporation of exhibits as such. ( a ) Any exhibit or part thereof previously or concurrently filed with the Commission pursuant to any Act administered by the Commission, may, subject to the limitations of § 228.10(f) and § 229.10(d) of this chapter, be incorporated by reference as an exhibit to any application, statement or report filed with the Commission by the same or any other person. Any exhibit or part thereof so filed with a trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 may be incorporated by reference as an exhibit to any report filed with such trustee pursuant to section 314(a) of that Act by the same or any other person.
( b ) If any modification has occurred in the text of any exhibit incorporated by reference since the filing thereof, there shall be filed with the reference a statement containing the text of any such modification and the date thereof.
( c ) If the number of copies of any exhibit previously or concurrently filed is less than the number required to be filed with the application, statement or report which incorporates such exhibit, there shall be filed with the application, statement or report as many additional copies of the exhibit as may be necessary to meet the requirements of such application, statement or report.
[6 FR 667, Jan. 30, 1941, as amended at 29 FR 2421, Feb. 13, 1964; 60 FR 32825, June 23, 1995; 76 FR 71877, Nov. 21, 2011]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jarmel Johnson, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 330]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered January 12, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, reversal of his convictions is not warranted as a result of an alleged violation of the *Rosario*rule *(see, People v Haupt,*71 NY2d 929; *People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286). In this regard, the trial court acted within the bounds of its discretion by granting the defendant’s request for an adverse inference charge *(see, People v Banch,*80 NY2d 610; *People v Wallace,*76 NY2d 953, 955).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence was legally sufficient to support the convictions *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
March 10, 2016 

The Honorable Nita M. Lowey 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congresswoman Lowey: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of February 8, 2016, regarding the recent tritium leak at the Indian Point Energy Center. 

Let me first assure you that there is no health risk to the public due to the increased tritium 

levels detected and that the quantity of radioactivity in the leak is a small fraction of the plant’s 

authorized effluent limit. 

 Since the licensee notified the NRC of the elevated tritium levels on February 5th, we 

have been closely observing the licensee’s remedial actions and regularly monitoring the status 

of the leak and tritium levels. This is part of our independent assessment of the cause of the 

leak, which also includes NRC inspections and other oversight activities. Our inspectors are 

reviewing Entergy’s actions to mitigate the potential impacts of the leak (e.g., installation of a 

low-flow pumping system), and assessing the timeliness of actions to decrease the local 

concentrations of tritium. We will provide our assessment in an inspection report that is 

expected to be issued in mid-May, and we will communicate those results to our Federal and 

State partners. 

I understand your concerns and want you to know that NRC is taking all appropriate 

action to ensure this issue is fully addressed. If you need any additional information, please 

contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns
#### Katie Mineer GARRET, Movant, v. Roger SEWELL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 21, 1950.

Redwine & Redwine and S. S. Willis, for appellant.

J. Marshall McCann, and John G. Atchison, for appellee.

PER CURIAM

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Clark Circuit 'Court for defendant in action for $292.00. The appeal is denied and the judgment stands affirmed.
**~.** #'. • .:••



## StateofWashington
JOHNSPELLMAN.Governor Mr. John R. Spencer Regional Administrator Region X United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Mr. Spencer: 

### May 3, 1982 OFFICEOFTHEGOVERNOR 

# fR?@:@

# @;D

# \l!l

# §fDJ MAY 61982 WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH In accordance with Public Law 94-580, Subtitle C, Section 3006(c), 1976, the state of Washington hereby applies Interim Authorization for Phase I and Phase II, components A and B, to administer the State Dangerous Waste Management program in lieu of the Federal program. The attached application and its component parts represent over a year of effort in its preparation, including the adoption of new Dangerous Waste Regulations. We feel that the evidence submitted in this application will show that the State Program is substantially equivalent to the Federal Program and, as such, should be granted interim authtDrization. I would like to extend my appreciation to the Environmental Protection Agency's Region X and Headquarters hazardous waste staff who provided us with a continuous review of the component parts of the application as they were developed. If there are any questions or if additional information is needed, please contact Donald W. Moos, Director of the Department of Ecology.

Enclosure
cc: Senator Henry M. Jackson, 

### wlo encl. Senator Slade Gorton, 

### wlo encl. Representative DonBonker, 

### wlo encl. Representative Norman D. Dicks, 

### wlo encl. Representative Thomas S. Foley, 

### wlo encl. Representative Mike Lowry, 

### wlo encl. Representative Sid W. Morrison, 

### wlo encl. Representative Joel Pritchard, 

### wlo encl. Representative Al Swift, 

### wlo encl. 

### MAY5 ;982 Or;:.:E**~.F** 

### REGIONAL ADMINISTR&.'fftR ", 

# .'

.. ' 

### - ..

## - ... .. LegislativeBuilding • Olympia, Washington98504 • (206) 753-6780 • (Scan)234-6780**~3**
1844.204-70 NASA contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.244–70, Geographic Participation in the

Aerospace Program, in all research and development solicitations and contracts of $500,000 or over

that will be performed within the United States.

Parent topic: Subpart 1844.2—Consent to Subcontracts
#### Merchants National Bank & Trust Company of Syracuse, Respondent v Syracuse Eagles Hockey Club Corp., et al., Defendants; Domenic Urciuoli et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2)

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Hancock, J., and the *1005same memorandum as in *Merchants Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Syracuse v Syracuse Eagles Hockey Club Corp.*58 AD2d 1004). (Appeals from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—motion to renew.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.7a-19 Margin for binding.

The application, statement or report, including all amendments and, where practicable, all papers and documents filed as a part thereof, shall have a back or stitching margin of at least 11⁄2 inches for binding.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15g-5 Disclosure of compensation of associated persons in connection with penny stock transactions. ( a ) *General.* It shall be unlawful for a broker or dealer to effect a transaction in any penny stock for or with the account of a customer unless the broker or dealer discloses to such customer, within the time periods and in the manner required by paragraph (b) of this section, the aggregate amount of cash compensation that any associated person of the broker or dealer who is a natural person and has communicated with the customer concerning the transaction at or prior to receipt of the customer's transaction order, other than any person whose function is solely clerical or ministerial, has received or will receive from any source in connection with the transaction and that is determined at or prior to the time of the transaction, including separate disclosure, if applicable, of the source and amount of such compensation that is not paid by the broker or dealer.
( b ) *Timing.* ( 1 ) The information described in paragraph (a) of this section: ( i ) Shall be provided to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting any transaction with or for the customer for the purchase or sale of such penny stock; and
( ii ) Shall be given or sent to the customer in writing, at or prior to the time that any written confirmation of the transaction is given or sent to the customer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.10b-10.
( 2 ) A broker or dealer, at the time of making the disclosure pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, shall make and preserve as part of its records, a record of such disclosure for the period specified in 17 CFR 240.17a-4(b).
( c ) *Contingent compensation arrangements.* Where a portion or all of the cash or other compensation that the associated person may receive in connection with the transaction may be determined and paid following the transaction based on aggregate sales volume levels or other contingencies, the written disclosure required by paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section shall state that fact and describe the basis upon which such compensation is determined.
[57 FR 18034, Apr. 28, 1992]
#### Clayton M. Jones, Appellant, v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 1042.] ■
### §14043h–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043h–6 was editorially reclassified as section 21307 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                      1,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,371
<PP&E>                                         104,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,854)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,976
<BONDS>                                         33,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,907
<SALES>                                         22,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,091
<CGS>                                           15,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,868
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    158
<INCOME-TAX>                                        47
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 32





Certification of Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Andre J. Fernandez, Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 26, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steven J. SmithSteven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  October 29, 2010/s/ Andre J. FernandezAndre J. Fernandez, Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial OfficerDate:  October 29, 2010
#### § 279.9 Form PF, reporting by investment advisers to private funds.

This form shall be filed pursuant to Rule 204(b)-1 (§ 275.204(b)-1 of this chapter) by certain investment advisers registered or required to register under section 203 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3) that act as an investment adviser to one or more private funds.

[76 FR 71175, Nov. 16, 2011]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form PF, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
CNA Announces Retirement of D. Craig Mense, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and the Upcoming Appointment of James Anderson to the Role





CHICAGO, Illinois, April 26, 2018 - Today, CNA Financial Corporation announced that D. Craig Mense, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will retire from the Company, effective December 31, 2018.





“Craig joined CNA in 2004 and has served as an influential CFO to me and two of my predecessors,” says Dino E. Robusto, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  “Craig has made countless contributions to the success of CNA and he will be missed.  Craig’s enduring legacy is evidenced in the financial strength of our company.  His steadfast, disciplined leadership has built lasting market confidence and influenced the many employees who have learned from him.”





Mense said, “I am proud of what the Company and its employees have accomplished during my time here and am excited about the bright future that CNA now has in front of it.”  Robusto echoed Mense’s sentiment and announced that CNA will employ their succession plan and appoint an internal candidate to succeed Mense.





James Anderson, Senior Vice President and Head of Financial Planning & Analysis and Corporate Development, has been named as Mense’s successor.  Anderson joined CNA in 2012 and has been a key member of the Finance leadership team since that time.  He has proven himself an astute financial leader with a strong drive for results.  Before joining CNA, Anderson spent nearly a decade in investment banking focused on the insurance industry, ultimately as a Managing Director at Macquarie Capital.  That experience followed five years of consulting at Accenture.





“Having worked closely with James since my arrival, I have every confidence in his leadership and financial capabilities.  I enthusiastically welcome him as my partner,” says Robusto.





It is expected that Mense will officially transition the CFO role to Anderson during the third quarter of 2018.  Mense will remain with CNA through his retirement date.





About CNA


CNA is the eighth largest commercial insurer in the United States.  CNA provides a broad range of standard and specialized property and casualty insurance products and services for businesses and professionals in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia, backed by 120 years of experience and more than $45 billion of assets.  For more information about CNA, visit our website at www.cna.com .





Follow CNA (NYSE: CNA) on: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube





# # #





Press Contacts:





Brandon Davis


CNA


Brandon.Davis@cna.com


312-822-5167 / 773-383-7166





Sarah Pang


CNA


Sarah.Pang@cna.com


312-822-6394 / 312-607-5544
Subpart 5331.1 – APPLICABILTY               **Parent topic:** Part 5331 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures5331.109 Advance agreements.       (h) Pre-contract cost agreements should be reviewed for legal sufficiency (see this template for a sample Pre-contract Cost Agreement). As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement, the correct type of funds should be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement. While not legally necessary, prudent business acumen would dictate, that to the maximum extent possible, agreement on terms and conditions also be established prior to issuance of a pre-contract cost agreement. Contracting officers should consult with the designated clearance approval authority prior to agreement on pre-contract costs. The contracting officer should incorporate the pre-contract cost agreement into any resultant contract as an attachment within Section J.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15c1-2 Fraud and misrepresentation. ( a ) The term *manipulative, deceptive, or other fraudulent device or contrivance,* as used in section 15(c)(1) of the Act (section 2, 52 Stat. 1075; 15 U.S.C. 78 o (c)(1), is hereby defined to include any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
( b ) The term *manipulative, deceptive, or other fraudulent device or contrivance,* as used in section 15(c)(1) of the Act, is hereby defined to include any untrue statement of a material fact and any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, which statement or omission is made with knowledge or reasonable grounds to believe that it is untrue or misleading.
( c ) The scope of this section shall not be limited by any specific definitions of the term “manipulative, deceptive, or other fraudulent device or contrivance” contained in other rules adopted pursuant to section 15(c)(1) of the act. (Sec. 2, 52 Stat. 1075; 15 U.S.C. 78 *o*)


Cross Reference:
For regulation prohibiting employment of manipulative and deceptive devices as such term is used in section 15 of the Act, by any broker or dealer, see § 240.10b-3. [13 FR 8205, Dec. 22, 1948]