alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #P077]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for Public Assistance on November 15, 2004, the U.S. Small Business Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature. I find that the Bering Strait Regional Education Attendance Area and Northwest Arctic Borough in the State of Alaska constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by a severe winter storm, tidal surges and flooding occurring on October 18 through 20, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 14, 2005, at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 419004, Sacramento, CA 95841-9004. PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.900Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P07706. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008). Dated: November 19, 2004. Allan I. Hoberman, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-26571 Filed 12-1-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 270.12d1-2 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### African Development Foundation

      ( print page 70118)    

# Time:

Sunday, December 5, 2004—12 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday, December 6, 2004—8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

# Place:

Cherry Blossom Room, Grand Hyatt Hotel, 1000 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001. 

# Date:

December 5 and 6, 2004. 

# Status:

*Open Sessions:*                         Sunday, 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. Monday, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                     

*Closed Executive Session:*                         Sunday, 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.                     

## Agenda 

Sunday, December 5, 2004: 

12 p.m.—Chairman's Report. 

12:30 p.m.—Strategic Planning Session. 

4:30 p.m.—Executive Session. 

6 p.m.—Adjournment for day. 

Monday, December 6, 2004:

8:30 a.m.—Administrative and Management Session. 

12 p.m.—Adjournment. 

If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Doris Martin, General Counsel, who may be reached at (202) 673-3916. 

Nathaniel Fields, 

President. 

[FR Doc. 04-26658 Filed 11-30-04; 2:01 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur M. Jones, Respondent, against City of New York, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was employed as an auto mechanic in the department of water supply, gas and electricity of the City of New York. The proof suggests, and the Workmen’s Compensation Board has found, that claimant sustained two accidents. The first one was on October 22, 1947, while pushing hard on the transmission of a vehicle in the course of repair. He then suffered a pain in the chest, but did not stop work; the second was on November 7th of the same year, sustained while straining on a wrench loosening bolts. He testified he felt “that” sharp, crushing pain in his chest “again”. It has been found that he became disabled therefrom on January 9, 1948. Within two years, as required by section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, he filed a claim referring to October 22d as the time of accident. The claim was filed October 4, 1949. A separate claim was made as to the November 7th accident on October 25, 1950. This was after the two-year period, but an amendment to the original claim to include the November 7th accident was allowed by the board on January 11, 1952. The amendment may not have been within the power of the board, if the affirmance of the award is made to depend on the validity of the amendment as such. *(Matter of Acker*v. *Buffalo Forge Go.,*278 App. Div. 988.) But we think on the record of this ease the validity of the award does not depend on the amendment. The medical opinion in the record indicates that the second accident was a development of the first one, and a continuance of the same causation. The proof suggests that both accidents together caused the claimant’s disability and if this is so, claimant is entitled to compensation on the factual finding of the board that the disability arose in part from the accident of October 22, 1947. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Halpern, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.
§ 247.780 Exemption for banks from liability under section 29 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ( a ) No contract entered into before March 31, 2009, shall be void or considered voidable by reason of section 29(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78cc(b)) because any bank that is a party to the contract violated the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(a)), any other applicable provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder based solely on the bank's status as a broker when the contract was created.
( b ) No contract shall be void or considered voidable by reason of section 29(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78cc(b)) because any bank that is a party to the contract violated the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(a)) or the rules and regulations thereunder based solely on the bank's status as a broker when the contract was created, if: ( 1 ) At the time the contract was created, the bank acted in good faith and had reasonable policies and procedures in place to comply with section 3(a)(4)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(4)(B)) and the rules and regulations thereunder; and
( 2 ) At the time the contract was created, any violation of the registration requirements of section 15(a) of the Act by the bank did not result in any significant harm or financial loss or cost to the person seeking to void the contract.
§ 148.22 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Commission or other agency against which an award is sought may file an answer to the application. Unless counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the Presiding Officer upon request by counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency and the applicant.
( c ) Any answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the position of counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the adjudicatory proceeding, counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 148.26 of this part.
EXHIBIT 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”) dated January 23, 2006 to Employment Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”) by and between NuCO2 Inc. (“the Corporation”) and Robert R. Galvin (“Galvin”).


 



	
            WHEREAS, the Corporation and Galvin are parties to the Employment Agreement; and
 



 


WHEREAS, the Corporation and Galvin wish to amend the Employment Agreement to make certain modifications thereto;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for Ten Dollars ($10) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by each of the parties, the Corporation and Galvin hereby agree as follows:


 



	
            1.
 	
            Paragraph 1.5 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 



 


“1.5           The term of the Executive’s employment hereunder shall continue, except as otherwise provided herein, through October 31, 2008.”


 



	
            2.
 	
            Except as herein provided, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
 



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and Galvin have executed this Amendment to be executed this 23th day of January 2006.


 


 



	
            NUCO2 INC.
 	
             
 	
            ROBERT R. GALVIN
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
            By:
 	
            /s/ Michael E. DeDomenico
 	
             
 	
            /s/ Robert R. Galvin
 
	
             
 	
            Name: Michael E. DeDomenico
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
             
 	
            Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 274.223 Form N-RN, Current report, open- and closed-end investment company reporting.

This form shall be used by registered open-end management investment companies, or series thereof, and closed-end management investment companies, to file reports pursuant to § 270.18f-4(c)(7) and § 270.30b1-10 of this chapter.

[85 FR 83296, Dec. 21, 2020]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form N-RN, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
### §1856n–1. Reciprocal agreements with liability coverage

#### (a) Protection from liability for foreign firefighters and foreign fire organizations

Subject to subsection (b), in an agreement with a foreign fire organization entered into under section 1856n of this title, the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior may provide that—

(1) a foreign firefighter shall be considered to be an employee of the United States for purposes of tort liability while the foreign firefighter is acting within the scope of an official duty under the agreement; and

(2) any claim against the foreign fire organization or any legal organization associated with the foreign firefighter that arises out of an act or omission of the foreign firefighter in the performance of an official duty under the agreement, or that arises out of any other act, omission, or occurrence for which the foreign fire organization or legal organization associated with the foreign firefighter is legally responsible under applicable law, may be prosecuted only—

(A) against the United States; and

(B) as if the act or omission were the act or omission of an employee of the United States.

#### (b) Protection from liability for Federal firefighters and the Federal Government

The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior may provide the protections under subsection (a) if the foreign fire organization agrees—

(1) to assume any and all liability for any legal action brought against the Federal firefighter for an act or omission of the Federal firefighter while acting within the scope of an official duty under the agreement; and

(2) to the extent the United States or any legal organization associated with the Federal firefighter is not entitled to immunity from the jurisdiction of the courts having jurisdiction over the foreign fire organization receiving the services of the Federal firefighters, to assume any and all liability for any legal action brought against the United States or the legal organization arising out of—

(A) an act or omission of the Federal firefighter in the performance of an official duty under the agreement; or

(B) any other act, omission, or occurrence for which the United States or the legal organization associated with the Federal firefighter is legally responsible under the laws applicable to the foreign fire organization.

(Pub. L. 100–428, §4, as added Pub. L. 112–74, div. E, title IV, §411(5), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1040.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4 of Pub. L. 100–428 was renumbered section 5 and is classified to section 1856o of this title.
#### § 274.203 Form 4, statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities.

This form shall be filed pursuant to § 270.30h-1 for statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities required to be filed pursuant to section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-29(h)). (Same as § 249.104 of this chapter.)

[67 FR 43537, June 28, 2002]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 4, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15c3-2 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Joseph V. Vittoria, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.   The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the nine months
          ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C.78m); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


November 14, 2007


                                 By: /s/ Joseph V Vittoria
                                     ------------------------
                                     Name:  Joseph V. Vittoria
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.14e-7 Unlawful tender offer practices in connection with roll-ups. In order to implement section 14(h) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78n(h)): ( a ) ( 1 ) It shall be unlawful for any person to receive compensation for soliciting tenders directly from security holders in connection with a roll-up transaction as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, if the compensation is: ( i ) Based on whether the solicited person participates in the tender offer; or
( ii ) Contingent on the success of the tender offer.
( 2 ) Paragraph (a)(1) of this section is applicable to a roll-up transaction as defined in Item 901(c) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.901(c) of this chapter), structured as a tender offer, except for a transaction involving only: ( i ) Finite-life entities that are not limited partnerships;
( ii ) Partnerships whose investors will receive new securities or securities in another entity that are not reported under a transaction reporting plan declared effective before December 17, 1993 by the Commission under section 11A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78k-1); or
( iii ) Partnerships whose investors' securities are reported under a transaction reporting plan declared effective before December 17, 1993 by the Commission under section 11A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78k-1).
( b ) ( 1 ) It shall be unlawful for any finite-life entity that is the subject of a roll-up transaction as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section to fail to provide a security holder list or mail communications related to a tender offer that is in furtherance of the roll-up transaction, at the option of a requesting security holder, pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 240.14a-7.
( 2 ) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section is applicable to a roll-up transaction as defined in Item 901(c) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.901(c) of this chapter), structured as a tender offer, that involves: ( i ) An entity with securities registered pursuant to section 12 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78 *l*); or
( ii ) A limited partnership, unless the transaction involves only: ( A ) Partnerships whose investors will receive new securities or securities in another entity that are not reported under a transaction reporting plan declared effective before December 17, 1993 by the Commission under section 11A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78k-1); or
( B ) Partnerships whose investors' securities are reported under a transaction reporting plan declared effective before December 17, 1993 by the Commission under section 11A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78k-1).
[59 FR 63685, Dec. 8, 1994]
Exhibit No. 32
 
 
 Certification of Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Andre J. Fernandez, Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Steven J. SmithSteven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  August 11, 2010/s/ Andre J. FernandezAndre J. Fernandez, Executive Vice President, Finance & Strategy and Chief Financial OfficerDate:  August 11, 2010
#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Urgo, Respondent, against Charles G. Coster et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

Respondent has one apartment in his two-family dwelling into which he has brought to live with him his parents, his brother, and the family of the latter. He is not entitled to possession of both apartments in the dwelling nor can he obtain a second apartment on behalf of his relatives. *(Matter of Prete*v. *Finkelstein,*274 App. Div. 905.) In any event, his hardship is self-created. *(Matter of Meyer*v. *Finkelstein,*275 App. Div. 837.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 230.176 Circumstances affecting the determination of what constitutes reasonable investigation and reasonable grounds for belief under section 11 of the Securities Act. In determining whether or not the conduct of a person constitutes a reasonable investigation or a reasonable ground for belief meeting the standard set forth in section 11(c), relevant circumstances include, with respect to a person other than the issuer. ( a ) The type of issuer;
( b ) The type of security;
( c ) The type of person;
( d ) The office held when the person is an officer;
( e ) The presence or absence of another relationship to the issuer when the person is a director or proposed director;
( f ) Reasonable reliance on officers, employees, and others whose duties should have given them knowledge of the particular facts (in the light of the functions and responsibilities of the particular person with respect to the issuer and the filing);
( g ) When the person is an underwriter, the type of underwriting arrangement, the role of the particular person as an underwriter and the availability of information with respect to the registrant; and
( h ) Whether, with respect to a fact or document incorporated by reference, the particular person had any responsibility for the fact or document at the time of the filing from which it was incorporated.
[47 FR 11433, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0303 BRIAN JOHN TEMPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 9 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 2 2020

10/02/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0303