alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2345. Deeds; form and provisions

Deeds executed in connection with the disposal of property pursuant to the provisions of this chapter—

(a) shall be as simple as the Commission shall find to be appropriate, and may contain such warranties or covenants of title and other provisions (including any indemnity) as the Commission may deem appropriate;

(b) with respect to any dormitories or apartment houses and any property used or to be used for construction of housing developments for rental purposes, may retain or acquire such rights to the Commission to designate the future occupants of part or all of such properties as it may deem appropriate to insure the availability of housing for employees of the Commission and its contractors;

(c) may require that the transferee, his heirs, successors, and assigns shall compensate the Commission for any municipal services provided by the Commission at rates which will not be in excess of the average tax for such services in the immediate vicinity of the community; and any amounts due and unpaid for such compensation (together with interest and costs thereon) shall, as of the date on which such amounts become delinquent, be a lien in favor of the United States upon the premises sold by the Commission, though not valid as against any mortgagee, pledgee, purchaser, or judgment creditor until notice thereof has been filed in accordance with the laws of the State in which the property is situated or in the office of the clerk of the United States district court for the judicial district in which the property subject to the lien is situated, if such State has not by law provided for the filing of such notice;

(d) in transferring any property pursuant to sections 2321 and 2342 of this title, may impose such restrictions and requirements relating to the use of the premises and to public health and safety, as the Commission may deem appropriate, which restrictions and requirements shall not be valid beyond one year after the incorporation of the city at the community or after June 30, 1966, in the case of Los Alamos; and

(e) may require that any payments in lieu of property taxes or assessments for local improvements made by the Commission with respect to the property shall be equitably prorated.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 5, §55, 69 Stat. 477; Pub. L. 87–719, §12, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 665.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1962—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 87–719 inserted "or after June 30, 1966, in the case of Los Alamos" after "community".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
No: III-14-034 August 12, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 

International Safety Review Team Visits Clinton Nuclear Plant

An international team of nuclear safety experts will visit the Clinton nuclear power plant from 

August 12 through 28 to review operational safety practices at the facility located in Clinton, Ill., 

approximately 28 miles southeast of Bloomington.

The voluntary peer review, known as an Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) visit, is led by 

the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is based in Vienna, Austria. The 14-member team 

will include reviewers from Canada, Slovakia, Belgium, Mexico and other countries.

Established by IAEA in 1982, the OSART program is designed to assist member states in 

enhancing the operational safety of nuclear power plants and fostering continuous improvements through 

the dissemination on information on best practices. This will be the eighth OSART review of a U.S. 

nuclear power plant since the program was initiated.

Areas to be covered during the review include, but are not limited to, operational experience, 

training and qualifications, radiation protection, chemistry, emergency planning and preparedness and 

maintenance.

“While the NRC does not conduct the OSART review, the staff does closely follow it and any 

outcomes, both for their safety significance and any possible safety improvements,” said Region III 

Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

Once the OSART reviewers have complete their work, they will produce a report identifying best 

practices and suggesting possible safety improvements. This report will be provided to the plant’s 

operator, Exelon Generation Co., LLC, and the U.S. government.
**EXHIBIT11**

**MARKWESTHYDROCARBON, INC.COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE(000s, except per share data)**

 
|                                                           | **For the Quarter Ended** |   | **Year to date**  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
|                                                           | **June 30, 2001**         |   | **June 30, 2001** |   |
|                                                           |                           |   |                   |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Net income                                                     | $                         | 8      |              | $      | 1,457 |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Weighted average number  of outstanding shares of common stock | 8,473                     |   | 8,469             |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Basic earnings per  share                                      | $                         | 0.00   |              | $      | 0.17 |   |
|                                                           |                           |   |                   |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Net income                                                     | $                         | 8      |              | $      | 1,457 |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Weighted average  number of outstanding shares of common stock | 8,473                     |   | 8,469             |   |
| Dilutive stock options                                         | 16                        |   | 29                |   |
|                                                           |                           |   |                   |   |
|                                                           | 8,489                     |   | 8,498             |   |
|                                                           |                      |   |              |   |
| Earnings per share  assuming dilution                          | $                         | 0.00   |              | $      | 0.17 |   |
|                                                           |                           |   |                   |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Charles Sander, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
        as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
        the Company for the periods presented.

                                            /s/ Charles Sander
Date:       August 12, 2005                 ---------------------------------
                                                Charles Sander
                                                Chief Executive Officer of
                                                Catcher Holdings, Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Catcher Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Catcher Holdings,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Walter F. Olmsted, Respondent, v. Howard Teal, Appellant.

Memorandum: Defendant claims that subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law bars, as a matter of law, plaintiff’s recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained when defendant, while driving his own car, struck plaintiff. Both are employed by the West Canada Valley Central School, and both are covered by workmen’s compensation. Plaintiff is a bus driver and custodian. Defendant is a teacher of agriculture and his employment involves inspection of students’ home projects as well as teaching classes at the school. Proof to the effect that at the time of the accident, 3 :00 o’clock in the afternoon, defendant was driving to a garage on the school premises to report a soft tire on a school vehicle which he had driven that day, was uncontradicted. Defendant testified that his work for the day was not yet completed. The principal and vice-principal of the school both testified that defendant was permitted to use his own car on school business, and this was uncontradicted. A jury may not wholly disregard unsuspicious and uncontradicted testimony. *(Hull*v. *Littauer,*162 N. Y. 569.) On this record, it appears without question that both of these employees were acting within the course of their employment; the injury of either party at that time, if arising out of his employment, would be compensable; and both were *“*in the same employ ” within the meaning of the act. Plaintiff’s action is therefore barred. (See *Pantolo*v. *Lane,*185 Misc. 221.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Part 521 [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** General Services Administration Acquisition Manual
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated ("the Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                1.      The quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
                        the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully
                        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m); and

                2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.

August 15, 2006



                                                /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
### Part A—Administration
## Optimum® AcreMaxTMRW Insect Protection*

Active Ingredients:

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1 protein and the genetic material (PHP17662) necessary for its production in corn event DAS-59122-7 ......................................................... <0.0088%**

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry35Ab1 protein and the genetic material (PHP17662) necessary for its product ion in corn event DAS- 59122-7 ....................................................... <0 .00181%**

Inert Ingredient:

Phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) protein and the genetic material necessary for its produ ction in corn ...................................................................................... <0. 000058%**

* Optimum® AcreMaxTMRW Insect Protection contains 90% Herculex 1 Rootworm seed and 10% non-Bt seed blended together in a single container of seed.

** % total protein on a dry wt. basis as expressed in whole plant tissue in DAS-59122-7 plants.



### CAUTION

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN

NET CONTENTS __________________

EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER: 29964-RN

EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER: 029964-IA-001
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

7300 NW 62 nd Avenue
Johnston, IA 50131

1 Herculex Rootworm Protection technology by Dow AgroSc iences and Pioneer Hi-Bred. ®Herculex is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC

.DIRECTIONS FOR USE

It is a violation of federal law to use this product in any manner inconsistent with its labeling.

The plant-incorporated protectant product must be us ed as specified in the terms and conditions of the registration.

Corn has been transformed to express Bacillus thuringiensis strain PS149B1 Cry34/35Ab1 insecticidal crystal proteins (ICP) for the cont rol of western corn rootworm ( Diabrotica vigifera ), northern corn rootworm ( Diabrotica berberi ) and Mexican corn rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera zeae ) pests.

Routine application of insecticides to control western corn rootworm, northern corn rootworm or Mexican corn rootworm are unnecessary for corn containing B.t. Cry34/35Ab1 ICP.

Refuge Requirements for Optimum® AcreMaxTMRW Insect Protection

Optimum® AcreMaxTMRW Insect Protection contains a “built-in” 10% corn rootworm refuge by virtue of the blended non-Bt refuge seed in the bag. No furt her corn rootworm refuge is required to minimize the risk of corn rootworm developing resistance.



### USE PATTERN

CROP PESTS

Field corn western corn rootworm

northern corn rootworm

Mexican corn rootworm
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Commercial
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained

in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: November 3, 2004 /s/ Harry Brill
537.7003 General.

(a) GSA employee use of UAS. GSA is prohibited from owning and procuring UAS (commonly

referred to as “drones”) for use by GSA employees.

(b) GSA-funded acquisitions that use UAS. GSA may contract for services that use ancillary UAS. For

any contract, order, agreement, purchase card transaction, or purchasing mechanism used for GSAfunded acquisitions for services that use ancillary UAS services, the requirements office must.

(1)Specify in the contract language that:

UAS will not be owned or used exclusively by GSA; and,

(The contractor will comply with the requirements of all applicable FAA regulations including but

not limited to 14 CFR Part 107 “Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems”

(https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-107).

(2)Ensure that the UAS is not a covered UAS.

(3)Ensure all UAS are registered and authorized for use through the process detailed in the GSA

Information Technology (IT) Security Procedural Guide CIO-IT Security-20-104, “Drones/Unmanned

Aircraft Systems (UAS) Security”.

UAS registered and authorized for use. UAS that is registered and authorized for use can be found

at the GSA Enterprise Architecture Analytics and Reporting (GEAR) application (https://ea.gsa.gov/).

Utilizing GEAR will ensure the procurement does not violate the prohibition at 537.7002(a).

Request for new UAS. For new UAS not already registered and authorized for use in the GEAR

application (https://ea.gsa.gov/), follow the instructions in the “GSA IT Security Procedural Guide

CIO-IT Security-20-104, “Drones/Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Security”.

(4)Review and incorporate the applicable sections, requirements, and best practices of “GSA IT

Security Procedural Guide CIO-IT Security-20-104, “Drones/Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)

Security” in the statement of work or equivalent. This includes:

(i)UAS Operator Approval and Recertification;

(ii)Installation and use of UAS software and firmware;

(iii)Securing UAS operations;

(iv)UAS data storage and transfer; and,

(v)Approval of UAS platforms.

(5)Coordinate pre-award solicitations with IS-Contracts-Review@gsa.gov for GSA IT review and

approval of the applicable sections, requirements, and best practices for the ancillary UAS services,

see also 539.101(b) for CIO coordination involving the acquisition of information technology.

(6)Review and incorporate the applicable sections and requirements of GSA Order OAS 5615.1,
“Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Policy”.

(c) Assisted acquisitions that use UAS. The requesting agency is responsible for ensuring that its

UAS policy and operational guidance has been established and is followed. As the servicing agency,

the GSA contracting officer should confirm the existence of the requesting agency’s policy and

operational guidance by documenting it in the interagency agreement or through a separate

document included in the contract file.

Parent topic: Subpart 537.70 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Services
Subpart 5309.1 - RESPONSIBLE

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS

Parent topic: Part 5309 - Contractor Qualifications

5309.103 Policy

(b)(i) Section 1612 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (P.L.

115-91) requires Space Systems Command (SSC) to establish and maintain a Space Contractor

Responsibility Watch List (CRWL). SSC Instruction (SSCI) 64-101, Space Contractor Responsibility

Watch List (CRWL), establishes the CRWL and its applicability to space program solicitations or

contracts.

5309.104-1 General Standards

See the tailorable Determination and Findings -- Contractor Responsibility template.
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:12 AM

To: Exparte Communications

Subject: Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power

Supplies; Proposed Rule Making ‐ Ex Parte Communication

Apple Inc. met with DOE to discuss the notice of proposed rule making the

Department sent out regarding battery chargers and external power supplies.  

Below is a list of topics that Apple discussed with DOE.  

‐ Discussion regarding Battery Charger product Class 8 and that it does not scale

with battery capacity. Class 8 is for DC‐DC battery chargers.

‐ Timeline for the effective date of the DOE battery charger efficiency

regulation and the external power supply regulation.   

‐ Flexibility of DOE Battery Charger efficiency mark to be placed on the retail

package as an alternate to marking the product surface.

‐ Discussion of replacement parts and refurbished products produced prior to the

DOE effective date.

‐ Discussion of DOE proposed EPS Level VI efficiency criteria as compared to that

of Level V and how the implementation date

  has an impact on manufacturers.
#### § 4.17 Severability.

If any provision of this part, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or application of such provision to other persons or circumstances which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

[78 FR 52333, Aug. 22, 2013]
### §16152. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Clean hydrogen; hydrogen

The terms "clean hydrogen" and "hydrogen" mean hydrogen produced in compliance with the greenhouse gas emissions standard established under section 16166(a) of this title, including production from any fuel source.

#### (2) Fuel cell

The term "fuel cell" means a device that directly converts the chemical energy of a fuel, which is supplied from an external source, and an oxidant into electricity by electrochemical processes occurring at separate electrodes in the device.

#### (3) Heavy-duty vehicle

The term "heavy-duty vehicle" means a motor vehicle that—

(A) is rated at more than 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight;

(B) has a curb weight of more than 6,000 pounds; or

(C) has a basic vehicle frontal area in excess of 45 square feet.

#### (4) Infrastructure

The term "infrastructure" means the equipment, systems, or facilities used to produce, distribute, deliver, or store hydrogen (except for onboard storage).

#### (5) Light-duty vehicle

The term "light-duty vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is rated at 8,500 or less pounds gross vehicle weight.

#### (6) Portable; storage

The terms "portable" and "storage", when used in reference to a fuel cell, include—

(A) continuous electric power; and

(B) backup electric power.

#### (7) Task Force

The term "Task Force" means the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Task Force established under section 16155 of this title.

#### (8) Technical Advisory Committee

The term "Technical Advisory Committee" means the independent Technical Advisory Committee established under section 16156 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VIII, §803, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 844; Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, §40312, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1006.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pars. (1) to (4). Pub. L. 117–58, §40312(2), (3), added par. (1) and redesignated former pars. (1) to (3) as (2) to (4), respectively. Former par. (4) redesignated (5).

Par. (5). Pub. L. 117–58, §40312(2), redesignated par. (4) as (5). Former par. (5) redesignated (6).

Pub. L. 117–58, §40312(1), substituted "Portable; storage" for "Stationary; portable" in heading and "The terms 'portable' and 'storage', when" for "The terms 'stationary' and 'portable', when" in introductory provisions.

Pars. (6) to (8). Pub. L. 117–58, §40312(2), redesignated pars. (5) to (7) as (6) to (8), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wayne A. Pratt, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     May 10, 2007 /s/ Wayne A. Pratt Wayne A. Pratt    Chief Financial Officer