alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 366A/30 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 366A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 63.° ano30 de outubro de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 366A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

63.° ano30 de outubro de 2020

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2020/C 366 A/01 | Retificação do anúncio de vaga CONS/AD/162/20 ( JO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

2020/C 366 A/01

Retificação do anúncio de vaga CONS/AD/162/20 ( JO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 )

( JO C 358 A de 26.10.2020 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 30.10.2020 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 366/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 366/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de vaga CONS/AD/162/20

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 358 A de 26 de outubro de 2020
  )

(2020/C 366 A/01)

Na página 1, na rubrica «INFORMAÇÕES GERAIS», «Serviço»:

| em vez de: | «DG RELEX: Negócios Estrangeiros, Alargamento e Proteção Civil», |
| --- | --- |

em vez de:

«DG RELEX: Negócios Estrangeiros, Alargamento e Proteção Civil»,

| deve ler-se: | «DG RELEX: Relações Externas». |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se

«DG RELEX: Relações Externas».

Na página 1, na rubrica «Quem somos», segundo parágrafo:

| em vez de: | «A Direção-Geral dos Negócios Estrangeiros, do Alargamento e da Proteção Civil (DG RELEX) compreende atualmente DUAS direções: a RELEX.1, que trata do Comércio, Desenvolvimento, Segurança e Coordenação, e a RELEX.2, que trata do Alargamento, Médio Oriente-Norte de África e Proteção Civil.». |
| --- | --- |

em vez de:

em vez de

«A Direção-Geral dos Negócios Estrangeiros, do Alargamento e da Proteção Civil (DG RELEX) compreende atualmente DUAS direções: a RELEX.1, que trata do Comércio, Desenvolvimento, Segurança e Coordenação, e a RELEX.2, que trata do Alargamento, Médio Oriente-Norte de África e Proteção Civil.».

| deve ler-se: | «A Direção-Geral das Relações Externas (DG RELEX) compreende atualmente duas direções: a RELEX.1, que trata do Comércio, Desenvolvimento e Segurança, e a RELEX.2, que trata da Política de Vizinhança e Resposta a Crises.». |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se

«A Direção-Geral das Relações Externas (DG RELEX) compreende atualmente duas direções: a RELEX.1, que trata do Comércio, Desenvolvimento e Segurança, e a RELEX.2, que trata da Política de Vizinhança e Resposta a Crises.».

---
Termination of Directorship Agreement of EnerSys SPRL



 Exhibit 10.2 
 TERMININATION OF DIRECTORSHIP AGREEMENT 
 THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT, by and between EnerSys SPRL f/k/a Hawker Belgium S.A., a Belgian company (the “Company”) and Raymond R. Kubis (the “Executive”), dated this 30th day of June, 2007. 
 Background 
 WHEREAS, on or about January 8, 2002, the Company and Executive entered into a Managing Directorship Agreement (the “Directorship
Agreement”), as subsequently amended; and 
 WHEREAS, in consideration for a new employment agreement with EH Europe GmbH, an affiliate
of the Company, the parties have agreed to voluntarily terminate the Directorship Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto, each intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 Agreement

 1. Effective as of June 30, 2007, the Directorship Agreement shall terminate. Executive will continue to serve as Managing
Director of the Company without remuneration other than the remuneration provided in the Swiss Agreement. The shareholders of the Company shall have the right to remove Executive as the Managing Director of the Company and from the Board of
Directors at any time for any reason or no reason, without notice or indemnity to be observed or paid by the Company. 
 2. In consideration
of the new employment agreement with EH Europe GmbH, Executive hereby releases and forever discharges Company and all of its agents, affiliates, officers, employees, attorneys, heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, assigns, and
other representatives from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action or suits of any kind or nature whatsoever, in law or in equity, whether the same are known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, that Executive, his successors or
assigns, ever had, now has or hereafter can, shall or may have arising out of or relating to the Directorship Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first written above. 
  

									
	EnerSys SPRL	 		 	
					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Nadine de Smet
	 		 		 	 /s/ Raymond R. Kubis

		 	Nadine de Smet – Director	 		 		 	Raymond R. Kubis
§ 239.144 Form 144, for notice of proposed sale of securities pursuant to § 230.144 of this chapter. ( a ) Except as indicated in paragraph (b) of this section, each person who intends to sell securities in reliance upon § 230.144 of this chapter, where the issuer of the securities: ( 1 ) Is, and has been for a period of at least 90 days immediately before the sale, subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o (d), respectively), shall file this form in electronic format by means of the Commission's Electronic Data, Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) in accordance with the EDGAR rules set forth in part 232 of this chapter (Regulation S-T).
( 2 ) Is not subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o (d), respectively), shall file three copies of this form in paper format.
( b ) This form need not be filed if the amount of securities to be sold during any period of three months does not exceed 5,000 shares or other units and the aggregate sale price does not exceed $50,000.
( c ) Under sections 2(11), 4(1), 4(2), 4(4) and 19(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR 230) and Rule 144 thereunder, the Commission is authorized to solicit the information required to be supplied by this form by persons desiring to sell unregistered securities. Disclosure of the information specified in this form is mandatory before processing notices of proposed sale of securities under § 230.144 of this chapter. The information will be used for the primary purpose of disclosing the proposed sale of unregistered securities by persons deemed not to be engaged in the distribution of securities. This notice will be made a matter of public record. Therefore, any information given will be available for inspection by any member of the public. Because of the public nature of the information, the Commission can utilize it for a variety of purposes, including referral to other governmental authorities or securities self-regulatory organizations for investigatory purposes or in connection with litigation involving the Federal securities laws or other civil, criminal or regulatory statutes or provisions. Failure to disclose the information requested by Form 144 would make an exception under § 230.144 of this chapter unavailable and may result in civil or criminal action for violations of the Federal securities laws.
[37 FR 4329, Mar. 2, 1972, as amended at 40 FR 55319, Nov. 28, 1975; 43 FR 5423, Nov. 21, 1978; 62 FR 35340, July 1, 1997; 68 FR 25799, May 13, 2003; 72 FR 71571, Dec. 17, 2007] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting Form 144, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7001** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JOSEPH EVELYN WING , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United St ates District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00010

- F

- 1; 5:10

- cv - 00170

- F )

Submitted : December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph Evelyn Wing, Appellant Pro Se. Joe Exum, Jr., Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Evelyn Wing seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unl ess a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U. S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a d ebatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark Meller,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.




                                      Date: August 20, 2007



                                      By /s/ Mark Meller
                                      ---------------------
                                      Mark Meller
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Principal Financial Officer
§ 201.430 Appeal of actions made pursuant to delegated authority. ( a ) *Scope of rule.* Any person aggrieved by an action made by authority delegated in §§ 200.30-1 through 200.30-8 or §§ 200.30-11 through 200.30-18 of this chapter may seek review of the action pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Procedure* — ( 1 ) *Notice of intention to petition for review.* A party to an action made pursuant to delegated authority, or a person aggrieved by such action, may seek Commission review of the action by filing a written notice of intention to petition for review within five days after actual notice of the action to that party or aggrieved person, or 15 days after publication of the notice of action in the Federal Register, or five days after service of notice of the action on that party or aggrieved person pursuant to § 201.141(b), whichever is the earliest.
( 2 ) *Petition for review.* Within five days after the filing of a notice of intention to petition for review pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the person seeking review shall file a petition for review containing a clear and concise statement of the issues to be reviewed and the reasons why review is appropriate. The petition shall include exceptions to any findings of fact or conclusions of law made, together with supporting reasons for such exceptions based on appropriate citations to such record as may exist. These reasons may be stated in summary form.
( c ) *Prerequisite to judicial review.* Pursuant to Section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 704, a petition to the Commission for review of an action made by authority delegated in §§ 200.30-1 through 200.30-18 of this chapter is a prerequisite to the seeking of judicial review of a final order entered pursuant to such an action. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2), any decision by the Commission pursuant to 200.30-11 shall not be reviewable under 15 U.S.C. 78y and shall not be deemed 'final agency action' for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 704.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995; 60 FR 46500, Sept. 7, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13179, Mar. 19, 2004; 70 FR 72570, Dec. 5, 2005; 75 FR 47449, Aug. 6, 2010]
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgewater Foods International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I,
Michael Boswell, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date:  January
20, 2009





/s/ Michael
Boswell


Michael
Boswell,


Acting
Chief Accounting Officer
### §2237. Modification of license

The terms and conditions of all licenses shall be subject to amendment, revision, or modification, by reason of amendments of this chapter or by reason of rules and regulations issued in accordance with the terms of this chapter.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §187, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 955; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.
No: II-16-010 March 22, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Annual Assessment of St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Tuesday, 

March 29, to discuss the agency’s assessment of the safety performance of the St. Lucie nuclear power 

plant during 2015.

The plant, operated by Florida Power & Light Co., is located about 10 miles southeast of Fort 

Pierce near Jensen Beach, Fla.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at 

the Energy Encounter, located adjacent to the plant at 6501 South Ocean Drive, Highway A1A, Gate B,

Jensen Beach. NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions 

on the safety performance and regulatory oversight of the St. Lucie plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections.

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure St. Lucie and other 

nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual 

meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn 

about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing 2015 St. Lucie plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant.

The NRC review concluded that the St. Lucie plant operated in a manner that preserved public 

health and safety and protected the environment. Unit One received some additional oversight and 

inspection during the first half of the year due to a finding of low to moderate safety significance in the 

third quarter of 2014. That finding – since corrected – involved failure to maintain watertight integrity 

of the reactor auxiliary building. Both units will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline 

inspections this year that all nuclear power plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All of the inspection findings and 

performance indicators for St. Lucie were green in 2015.

Current performance information for St. Lucie Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC website.
### §19193. Definition

In this part, the term "Director" means the Director of the National Science Foundation.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, §10533, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1628.)
### §17552. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17552 was editorially reclassified as section 60552 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     /s/ David A. Wilson                        August 16, 2004
------------------------------------
David A. Wilson                                 Date
Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.14a-10 Prohibition of certain solicitations. No person making a solicitation which is subject to §§ 240.14a-1 to 240.14a-10 shall solicit: ( a ) Any undated or postdated proxy; or
( b ) Any proxy which provides that it shall be deemed to be dated as of any date subsequent to the date on which it is signed by the security holder.
[17 FR 11434, Dec. 18, 1952]
#### § 239.701 [Reserved]
### §19302. Clean Energy Technology University Prize competition

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Eligible entity

The term "eligible entity" means a nonprofit entity, an institution of higher education, or an entity working with one or more institutions of higher education.

#### (2) Minority-serving institution

The term "minority-serving institution" means an institution described in section 1067q(a) of title 20.

#### (b) In general

The Secretary shall establish a program, known as the "Clean Energy Technology University Prize", to award funding for eligible entities to carry out regional and one national clean energy technology prize competitions, under section 3719 of title 15. In carrying out such prize competitions, students shall compete to develop a business model for furthering the commercial application of an innovative clean energy technology.

#### (c) Training funding

In carrying out this program, the Secretary may provide funding to train participating students in skills needed for the successful commercial application of clean energy technologies, including through virtual training sessions.

#### (d) Prioritization

In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize awarding grants to eligible entities that work with students at minority-serving institutions.

#### (e) Coordination

In carrying out this program, the Secretary shall coordinate and partner with other clean energy technology prize competitions. In doing so, the Secretary may develop and disseminate best practices for administering prize competitions under this section.

#### (f) Report

In accordance with section 16391a of this title, the Secretary shall report annually on the progress and implementation of the program established under section (b).

#### (g) Evaluation

In accordance with section 16391a of this title, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate an evaluation on the long-term outcomes of the program established under this section and the progress towards achieving the purposes of the program in subsection (b).

#### (h) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the activities authorized in this section $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10714, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1703.)
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.17a-9T Records to be made and retained by certain exchange members, brokers and dealers. This section applies to every member, broker or dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Act, (15 U.S.C. 78 *o*), that is required to maintain, as of December 29, December 30 and December 31, 1999, minimum net capital of $250,000 pursuant to § 240.15c3-1(a)(2)(i). ( a ) You must make before January 1, 2000, for each of December 29, December 30 and December 31, 1999, separate copies of the blotters pursuant to § 240.17a-3(a)(1).
( b ) You must make before January 1, 2000, as of the close of business for each of December 29, December 30 and December 31, 1999, a separate copy of the securities record or ledger pursuant to § 240.17a-3(a)(5).
( c ) You must preserve these records for a period of not less than one year.
( d ) The provisions of § 240.17a-4(i) shall apply as if part of this § 240.17a-9T.
( e ) You may preserve these records in any format that is acceptable and in compliance with the conditions described in § 240.17a-4(f).
( f ) You must furnish promptly to a representative of the Commission such legible, true and complete copies of those records, as may be requested.
( g ) This temporary section will expire on July 1, 2001.
[64 FR 42029, Aug. 3, 1999]
1811.404-70 NASA contract clauses.

The clause at 1852.211–70, Packaging, Handling, and Transportation, must be included in

solicitations and contracts for deliverable items, including software, designated as Class I (mission

essential), Class II (delicate or sensitive), or Class III (requires special handling or monitoring).

Parent topic: Subpart 1811.4—Delivery or Performance Schedules