P. 1


# OAR Box 1770 Prepped by Keeia Richards



## Document

Number: 

# 35 ) XII-C- 2 Docket Number: 

# A-79-1 5

Printed 10/28/200810:20:28 AM Sheet 35of 93. 

# QQPrWyMJDSAtXtt P. 2



### Palmer , Walte r VA01.5/27/9 9 1:5 9 P M -0400,Cok e Ove nResidua l Ris k A From : WPalmereicfkaiser.com (Palmer , Walte r VA01 ) Docke t No . A-79-1 5 To : dailor@accci . or g ( ' dailortaccci . org' ) Ite m No . XII-C- 2 Mime-Version : 1. 0 Organization : IC F Kaise r International , Inc . Date : Thu , 2 7 Ma y199 9 13:59:5 6 -040 0 Subject : Cok e Ove n Residua l Ris k Assessmen t
David ; I forwar d the attache d fo r you r information/interest . I'l l cal l yo u late r t o discus s i t Bes t Regards , Walte r Palme r Projec t Manage r IC F Consulting [ [ DATA-1.DO C : 440 2 i n DATA-1.D0 C ] ] 1§1DATA~I.DO C



## MAR - 9 200 4
EP AAI R DOCKE T



### Printe dfo r

Davi dAilo r

<dailor@nopa.org >P. 3 

# 1

COK E OVEN S RESIDUA L RIS KASSESMENT : DAT ALIKEL YT O BE USE D I N TH E ASSESSMEN T Th e followin g ar

e type s o fdat a likel yt o b e used i n th e residua l ris k assessment o

f cok e ovens . 1
. Facilitie s Th e ris k assessmen t wil l addres s facilitie s tha t ar e subject t o MAC Tstandard s an d are cunentl yi n operatio n (no t i n shutdow n status)
. Apreliminar ylis t o f suc h facilitie s i s presente d i n Tabl e 1
. I t wil l b e necessar yt o confir m thi s lis t i n th e earl ystage s o f th e assessment . Tabl e 1

Initia l Lis t o fFacilitie s an d Batterie s Subject t o MAC TStandard s Facilit y A KStee l Middletow n A KStee l Ashlan d Eri e Coke Eri e Cok e Gul f State s Stee l Gul f State s Stee l Ne wBosto n Coke Tonawand a Coke Batter y

Designatio n 3 3 A B 2 2 2 2 Heigh t

(m ) 4. 0 4. 0 3. 5 3. 5 4. 0 4. 0 4. 0 4. 0 No
. o fOven s

7 6 7 6 2 3 3 5 6 5 6 5 7 0 6 0 NOTE : LTV Stee l Pittsburg h an d Toled o Cok e ar e no t include d sinc e the yar e i n shutdow n status . • 2
. Batter yConfiguration/Temperatur e Dat a Th e followin g dat a wil l b e usefu l t o th e assessment :

• batter

ydimensions : lengt h an d widt h o fbatterytop ; • distanc e betwee n batteries ; • fo reac h battery : • surfac e temperatur e an d are a o fth e batter yove n doors , top s an d offtakes ; • brie f descriptio n o fhowthes e temperature s wer e measure d an d a t wha t distanc e fro m eac h surface
. 3
. Emission s Inventor yDat a Th e annua l ai remissio n inventor ysummarie s routinel ysubmitte d b yfacilitie s t o stat e o rloca l agencie s wil l b e keydat a fo rth e assessment . Thes e dat a includ e annua l an d hourl yactua l emission s o fcriteri a an d toxi cai rpollutants , permitte d levels , sourc e parameters , operatin g schedule , emissio n control s an d othe rrelevan t information
.P. 4

4 . Titl e V and/o r NESHA P Complianc e Data Th e Titl e V and/o rNESHA P complianc e dat a reporte d b yeac h facilit ywil l b e use d a s available
. Thes e dat a includ e emissio n sources , control s an d contro l measures , lea k monitorin g data , sourc e parameters , an d othe rrelevan t information
. 5 . TRIDat a Th e dat a tha t mus t b e reporte d byfacilitie s emittin g SARAai rtoxic s wil l b e use d i n th e assessment . 6 . Monitorin g Dat a An yothe rmonitorin g reports , stac k tes t data , etc . tha t mayb e availabl e fo r emission s fro m cok e ove n batterie s wil l b e valuabl e t o th e assessment . Usefu l dat a (i f available ) include : PMi 0 emissio n data ; particl e siz e distributions ; percen t opacity of emissions ; an d presenc e an d concentratio n o f specifi cchemica l compounds
. Thes e dat a ar e desire d fo rdoor , lid , offtake , charging , pushing , ho t car , an d decarbonizin g emissions , wher e available
. 7
. Alternat e Dat a Informatio n fo reac h batter yo rfacilitya s liste d i n Tabl e 2 wil l b e veryusefu l fo rth e assessment , particularl yi fth e informatio n describe d abov e (Item s 2 throug h 5 ) i s no t availabl e fo ran yfacilities
. Tabl e 2

Dat a Requiremen t fo rEstimatin g Emission s Chargin g

Doors
Lid s Offtake Pushin g Volum e o ftota l charg e j I s chargin g staged ? I s chargin g don e unde rstea m aspiration ? I s chargin g controlled ? Typ e o fcontro l Contro l efficiency Percen t leakin g door s (post-NESHAP ) Ar e doo rleaks controlled ? Contro l practice s | Contro l efficiencyj Percen t leakin g lid s (post-NESHAP ) j Ar e li d leaks controlled ? Contro l practice s Contro l efficiency Percen t offtake leak s (post-NESHAP ) Ar e offtak e leak s controlled ? Contro l practice s j Contro l efficiency I s pushin g controlled ? I fyes , chec k

eac h o f th e followin g tha t apply : • ES P • Ventur i scrubbe r • Ba g hous e • Hoode d scrubbe rca r • Coke guid e • Othe r(specify )

- —-P. 5 

# 1

Quenchin g

Combustio n stack

s
Genera l operatin g data Chec k eac h o fth e followin g tha t apply
. • Baffle d towe r • Uncontrolle d dea n wate r • Uncontrolle d dirt ywate r • Clea n water , tal l tower , and/o rpoo rmaintenanc e • Clea n water , norma l towe rheigh t an d prope r maintenanc e • Dirt ywater , tal l tower , and/o rpoo rmaintenanc e • Dirt ywater , norma l towe rheight , an d prope r maintenanc e Ar e emission s controlled ? I fyes , chec k

eac h o fth e followin g tha t apply : • ES P • Baghous e • Othe r(specify ) Cokin g cycl e time , hr s Amoun t o f cok e pe rcharg e Averag e no . o fpushin g pe rda y Dail yan d weekl yoperatin g profil e NOTE : Tabl e 2 cover s cok e ove n source s only
. I fth e ris k assessmen t cover s Trthe r source s (e.g
. th e byproduc t plant , coa l handling , an d othe roperations ) dat a wil l als o b e require d fo rthos e sources . 8
. Ambien t Monitorin g Dat a An yambien t monitorin g dat a collecte d nea r( < 3 km ) th e coke ove n facilit ywil l b e usefu l fo rcompariso n wit h an d verificatio n o fmode l results
. Thi s include s an ydirec t measuremen t o f BSO , gases , particulat e matte r(includin g depositio n measurements) , P M siz e distribution , an d mas s an d filte ranalyses
. Filte ranalyse s ma yinclud e chemica l analyse s using : x-ra yfluorescenc e fo rcoars e mod e particle s suc h a s Si , Mn , Al , Fe , Pb , Br , Ni , V ; atomi cabsorptio n fo rothe rmetals ; an d measuremen t o f elementa l an d organi ccarbo n fro m therma l optica l reflectanc e analysis
. Ideally , th e monitorin g tim e an d averagin g period s woul d b e include d wit h thes e data , an d change s i n operatio n o fth e subject coke oven s sinc e th e monitorin g perio d woul d als o b e defined
.



# K/o ^