alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3969 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Disperse Blue 77. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Disperse 

Blue 77. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DISPERSE BLUE 77. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3969 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of Disperse Blue 

77, (9,10-Anthracenedione, 

1,8-dihydroxy-4-nitro-5- 

(phenylamino)-) (CAS No. 

20241–76–3) and (3- 

Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[2-(2- 

cyano-4-nitrophenyl) 

diazenyl]-2-[[2-(2- 

hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]amino]- 

4-methyl-6-(phenylamino)-) 

(CAS No. 149988–44–3) and 

(3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2- 

cyano-4-nitrophenyl) 

diazenyl]-6-[[2-(2- 

hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]amino]- 

4-methyl-2-(phenylamino)-) 

(CAS No. 137428–29–6) and 

(Acetic acid, cyano-[3-[(6- 

methoxy-2-benzothiazoyl) 

amino]-1H-isoindol-1- 

ylidene]-, pentyl ester) (CAS 

No. 173285–74–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.11.35) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Guv E. Tripp, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Schenectady County Court dismissing a writ of error *coram nobis.*Defendant appeals from an order of the Schenec*988tady County Court, dismissing a writ of error *coram nobis*directed to a conviction for burglary third degree and petit larceny entered on a plea of guilty February 16, 1931. The ground for the writ is that defendant was not represented by counsel and was not advised of his right to counsel by the court, but the affidavit in opposition to the petition shows that on the original indictment is a notation that counsel was assigned by the court and the name of counsel. This proof is met with evasion in the petitioner’s answering affidavit. He does not deny that counsel was assigned to him or advised him. What he makes out is an argument against the form of the affidavit in opposition. He says that the opposing papers “ do not show where counsel advised the petitioner to plead 1 not guilty ’ ” or show that counsel *“*ever spoke for ” defendant on his arraignment. Altogether this amounts to something far less than a denial that he had counsel, and when the record shows, as here, that counsel was assigned, defendant has the burden of showing by a plain statement of fact either unequivocally that he had no counsel or exactly what counsel did in his case. When a petitioner is confronted with a notation showing the assignment of counsel, more than a mere argument is needed to show that there is a triable issue on that question. We think the court was right in holding there was no triable issue and the order is affirmed. Order affirmed. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1206 

CA 11-00870 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

LOUIS LEONE AND ROSITA LEONE, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

KYLE J. KACZMAREK, HELENE D. KACZMAREK, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, 

AND KELLY M. LEONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA, LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN R.

CONDREN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (DEBRA A. NORTON OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick

H. NeMoyer, J.), entered July 13, 2010 in a personal injury action. 

The order denied the motion of defendant Kelly M. Leone for summary

judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against her. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
### §16797. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §618, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2934, related to continuation of the Space Grant Program, the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research, and the NASA Explorer School program. See section 40908 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
5332.1106 EFT Mechanisms         (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).       **Parent topic:** Subpart 5332.11 – ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER
### §1437a–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §582(a)(1), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2643

Section, Pub. L. 101–625, title V, §519, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4202, authorized public housing rent waiver for police officers. See section 1437a(a)(4) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective and applicable beginning upon Oct. 1, 1999, except as otherwise provided, with provision that Secretary may implement the repeal before such date, and with savings provision, see section 503 of Pub. L. 105–276, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 1437 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Breswick *&*Company, Appellant, against Greater New York Industries, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order appealed from reversed and application granted. All concur. In this case inspection would not be granted except for the fact that the answering papers have not met the direct and explicit factual allegations of the petition. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. [See *post,*p. 930.]
#### § 242.800 Scope.

The provisions of §§ 242.800 through 242.835 shall apply to every security-based swap execution facility that is registered or is applying to become registered as a security-based swap execution facility under section 3D of the Securities Exchange Act (“Act”).
#### § 259.3 Qualifications and disclosures.

To prevent deceptive claims, qualifications and disclosures should be clear, prominent, and understandable. To make disclosures clear and prominent, marketers should use plain language and sufficiently large type for a person to see and understand them, should place disclosures in close proximity to the qualified claim, and should avoid making inconsistent statements or using distracting elements that could undercut or contradict the disclosure. The disclosures should also appear in the same format as the claim. For example, for television advertisements, if the fuel economy claim appears in the video, the disclosure recommended by this Guide should appear in the visual format; if the fuel economy claim is audio, the disclosure should be in audio.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Udaya Madanayake, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  of Javakingcoffee, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ Udaya Madanayake                 
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | Udaya Madanayake                     
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | October 21, 2004                     

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15d-5 Reporting by successor issuers. ( a ) Where in connection with a succession by merger, consolidation, exchange of securities, acquisition of assets or otherwise, securities of any issuer that is not required to file reports pursuant to section 15(d) (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) of the Act are issued to the holders of any class of securities of another issuer that is required to file such reports, the duty to file reports pursuant to such section shall be deemed to have been assumed by the issuer of the class of securities so issued. The successor issuer shall, after the consummation of the succession, file reports in accordance with section 15(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and the rules and regulations thereunder, unless that issuer is exempt from filing such reports or the duty to file such reports is suspended under section 15(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)).
( b ) An issuer that is deemed to be a successor issuer according to paragraph (a) of this section shall file reports on the same forms as the predecessor issuer except as follows: ( 1 ) An issuer that is not a foreign issuer shall not be eligible to file on Form 20-F (§ 240.220f of this chapter).
( 2 ) A foreign private issuer shall be eligible to file on Form 20-F.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to an issuer of securities in connection with a succession that was registered on Form F-8 (§ 239.38 of this chapter), Form F-10 (§ 239.40 of this chapter) or Form F-80 (§ 239.41 of this chapter).
[36 FR 3805, Feb. 27, 1971, as amended at 48 FR 46740, Oct. 14, 1983; 56 FR 30075, July 1, 1991; 62 FR 39768, July 24, 1997]
#### Christine Hoback, Appellant, v. Idalee Richardson, Appellee.

February 28, 1950.

William H. Field, Judge.

Jones, Keith & Jones for appellant.

Ray H. Kirchdorfer and Robert E. Hogan for appellee.

Judge Helm

Reversing.

This is a companion case to Richardson v. Hoback, *357and Blanton v. Hoback, 311 Ky. 574, 224 S. W. 2d 932, decided November 29, 1949.

All of these cases arose out of the same accident and were tried together. The facts, as well as the instructions given by the trial court, are set out in the above opinion. From the facts as set out in that case, it appears that the testimony in behalf of Mrs. Hoback was sufficient to take the case to the jury. The negligence of the driver, Frank J. Hoback, was not imputable to Mrs. Hoback.

Instructions Nos. 6 and 7E, as given by the trial court and as set out in that opinion, were erroneous so far as they were applicable to Mrs. Hoback. Because of that error, her case must be reversed for a new trial with proper instructions as to her. All other questions are reserved.

The judgment is reversed.
### §§1594j–1, 1594k. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–214, §7(6), (13), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 173, 174

Section 1594j–1, Pub. L. 92–545, title V, §508(a), (b), Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1149, related to inadequate quarters.

Section 1594k, Pub. L. 88–174, title V, §507, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 326; Pub. L. 89–188, title V, §505, Sept. 16, 1965, 79 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 90–110, title VI, §605, Oct. 21, 1967, 81 Stat. 304; Pub. L. 90–408, title VI, §607, July 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 388; Pub. L. 91–142, title V, §508, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 312; Pub. L. 91–511, title V, §507, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1220; Pub. L. 92–145, title V, §507, Oct. 27, 1971, 85 Stat. 407; Pub. L. 92–545, title V, §507, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1149; Pub. L. 93–166, title V, §508, Nov. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 676, related to guarantee of rental return to builders or other sponsors in foreign countries, and limitation on amount, period, and unit limitation of such guarantee.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, and applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing before, on, or after such date, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 97–214, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 97–214, §9(b), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 174, provided that the Secretary of Defense could continue in effect any agreement guaranteeing rental returns to builders or other sponsors of family housing in foreign countries under section 1594k of this title before Oct. 1, 1982, and may exercise any option of the United States in any such agreement that has not been exercised before such date.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4157 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Secretary of Labor from reissuing or issuing 

a rule substantially similar to a certain proposed rule 

under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 relating 

to child labor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4157 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND FINDINGS. 

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

3 ‘‘Preserving America’s Family Farms Act’’. 

4 (b) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

5 (1) family farms have a long history and tradi6 tion of providing youth with valuable work experi7 ence; 

8 (2) Department of Labor regulations should not 

9 adversely impact the longstanding tradition of youth 

10 working on farms where they can gain valuable skills 

11 and lessons on hard work, character, and leadership; 

12 (3) the Department of Labor’s proposed regula13 tions would have curtailed opportunities for youth to 

14 gain experiential learning and hands-on skills for en15 rollment in vocational agricultural training; 

16 (4) the proposed regulations would have ob17 structed the opportunity for youth to find rewarding 

18 employment and earn money for a college education 

19 or other meaningful purposes; 

20 (5) the proposed regulations would have limited 

21 opportunities for young farmers wishing to pursue a 

22 career in agriculture at a time when the average age 

23 of farmers continues to rise; and 

24 (6) working on a farm has become a way of life 

25 for thousands of youth across the rural United 

26 States. 
3 

•HR 4157 EH

1 SEC. 2. RULE RELATING TO CHILD LABOR. 

2 The Secretary of Labor shall not reissue in substan3 tially the same form, or issue a new rule that is substan4 tially the same as, the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Child Labor 

5 Regulations, Orders and Statements of Interpretation; 

6 Child Labor Violations—Civil Money Penalties’’ (pub7 lished at 76 Fed. Reg. 54836 (September 2, 2011)). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4157 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Secretary of Labor from reissuing 

Act of 1938 relating to child labor. proposed rule under the Fair Labor Standards or issuing a rule substantially similar to a certain
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extractedfrom the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations of the
Company's March 31, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                      4,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,909
<PP&E>                                         100,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,407)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,410
<BONDS>                                         26,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,015
<SALES>                                         40,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,561
<CGS>                                           28,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                       423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       687
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08



</TABLE>
§ 230.153b Definition of “preceded by a prospectus”, as used in section 5(b)(2), in connection with certain transactions in standardized options. The term *preceded by a prospectus,* as used in section 5(b)(2) of the Act with respect to any requirement for the delivery of a prospectus relating to standardized options registered on Form S-20, shall mean the delivery, prior to any transactions, of copies of such prospectus to each options market upon which the options are traded, for the purpose of redelivery to options customers upon their request, *Provided* That: ( a ) Such options market shall thereto have requested of the issuer, from time to time, such number of copies of such prospectus as may have appeared reasonably necessary to comply with the requests of options customers, and shall have delivered promptly from its supply on hand a copy to any options customer making a request thereof; and
( b ) The issuer shall have furnished such options market with such reasonable number of copies of such prospectus as may have been requested by the options market for the purpose stated above.
(15 U.S.C. 77a *et seq.*)
[47 FR 41955, Sept. 23, 1982]
§ 38.5 Information relating to contract market compliance. ( a ) *Requests for information.* Upon request by the Commission, a designated contract market must file with the Commission information related to its business as a designated contract market, including information relating to data entry and trade details, in the form and manner and within the time specified by the Commission in its request.
( b ) *Demonstration of compliance.* Upon request by the Commission, a designated contract market must file with the Commission a written demonstration, containing supporting data, information and documents, in the form and manner and within the time specified by the Commission, that the designated contract market is in compliance with one or more core principles as specified in the request, or that is requested by the Commission to show that the designated contract market satisfies its obligations under the Act.
( c ) *Equity interest transfers* — ( 1 ) *Equity interest transfer notification.* A designated contract market shall file with the Commission a notification of each transaction that the designated contract market enters into involving the transfer of ten percent or more of the equity interest in the designated contract market.
( 2 ) *Timing of Notification.* The equity transfer notice described in paragraph (1) shall be filed electronically with the Secretary of the Commission at its Washington, DC headquarters at *submissions@cftc.gov* and the Division of Market Oversight at *DMOSubmissions@cftc.gov ,* at the earliest possible time but in no event later than the open of business ten business days following the date upon which the designated contract market enters into a firm obligation to transfer the equity interest.
( 3 ) *Rule filing.* Notwithstanding the foregoing, any aspect of an equity interest transfer described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section that necessitates the filing of a rule as defined in part 40 of this chapter shall comply with the requirements of 5c(c) of the Act and part 40 of this chapter, and all other applicable Commission regulations.
( d ) *Delegation of authority.* The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, the authority set forth in paragraph (b) of this section to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time. The Director may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated in this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this paragraph.
[77 FR 36698, June 19, 2012]
### Williams , Rene e (OST) '\^0cXe. 4 t)QT-nST-/^'^V-'Z- ^ V 2 ^ From : Alli e Palazz i [alliepalaz52@yahoo.com ] Sent : Friday , Augus t 13 , 201 0 9:0 5 A M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Loca l Airline Proposa l RE : Local Airlin e Proposal I woul dlik e t o expres s my support for th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e proposa l b y Cap e Ai r for continue d^rvic e t o th e Watertow n Internationa l Airport . I nee dt o ge t t o Norther n Ne w Yor

k o n occasio n for

busines s an dI use dt o hav e t o driv e fro mAlban y t o Watertown . Cap e Air' s servic e allow s m e t o ge t t o th e Nort

h Country withou t havin g t o ren t

acar i n Alban y an ddrive . I notice dproposal s offere db y othe r airline s d o not

offe r servic e t o Norther n Ne w Yor k fro mAlbany . Thi s woul db e agreat

los s t o th e North Countr y a s I fee l servic e t o th e stat e capita l i s vita l t o th e econom y o f Northern Ne w York . Th e staf f a t Cap e Ai r i s alway s courteou s an dhelpful . A los s o f thei r connectio n t o Alban y woul db e ver y inconvenien t

for thos e o f u s wh o hav e becom e accustome dt o thei r service . Sincerely , Alli e A . Palazz i 721 8 Sheffiel dSquar e Nashville , TN 3722 1