alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 525.1 - Buy American Act—Supplies 	  **Parent topic:** Part 525 - Foreign Acquisition525.103 Exceptions 		    (a)                   *Public Interest*. 					           						             							              (1) Only the head of the agency may make the determination required by FAR 25.103(a). The head of the agency may not redelegate this authority. 						             						             							              (2)  The determination must consider the cost advantages of any foreign sourced steel, iron, or manufactured goods. 						             					           				         				         					          (b)                   *Nonavailability*. 					           						             							              (1)  *Class Determination*s. FAR 25.103(b)(1)(i) does not allow for class determinations to be made at the agency level 						             						             							              (2)                         *Class Determination*s– *Notice of Availability*. Regarding FAR 25.103(b)(1)(iii)(C), documentation supporting removal of an item from the list of Nonavailable Articles at FAR 25.104 should be submitted by the contracting officer to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) in the Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer. The SPE will determine whether the documentation should be forwarded to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC). 						             						             							              (3)                         *Individual Determinations*. Only the HCA may make the determination required by FAR 25.103(b)(2)(i). The HCA may not redelegate this authority. 						             						             							              (4)                         *Individual Determinations*—*Notice of Nonavailability*. Regarding when the contracting officer considers that non-availability of an item will affect future acquisitions (see FAR 25.103(b)(2)(ii)), documentation supporting the addition of articles to the list of Nonavailable Articles at FAR 25.104 should be submitted by the contracting officer to the SPE. The SPE will determine whether the documentation should be forwarded to the CAAC.
#### Peter Ralph, an Infant, by Joseph H. Ralph, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Jeremiah F. Ryan, Appellant.

and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Can-, Staple-ton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
From: "Speer, Matthew" < mspeer@capitalpowerusa.com >

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Kopecky, Christopher L." < ckopecky@capit alpowerusa.com >, "Sweigart, Dave" < dsweigart@capitalpowerusa.com >, "Dow, Jack" < jdow@capitalpowerusa.com >, "Nelson, David" < dnelson@capitalpowerusa.com >, "Edwards, John"

< jedwards@capit alpowerusa.com >, < mjsmith@capitalpower.com >, "Griffiths, Joseph"

< jgriffiths@capitalpowerusa.com >

Date: 07/16/2010 01:56 PM

Subject: Receipt Confirmation and Request for Extensio n

Ms. Alicea:

We are in receipt of the Information Collection Request (“ICR”) pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act for the facility identified in your database as Naval Station Energy Facility (Plant ID: 016360).

The ICR requires a response within ni nety (90) days of receipt. The Naval Station ICR was received at the facility on June 28, 2010 and responses would be due on September 26, 2010. However, as September 26, 2010 is a Sunday, we interpret the su bmittal deadline to be Monday, September 27th, 2010. The scope of the request is very broad and will require a number of CPI personnel to spend considerable time in preparing the response. CPI is (i) currently in peak generating season; (ii) completing similar requests for the CPI North Carolina Roxboro and Southport facilities and (iii) respon ding to a request from EPA under Section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act with respect to the Roxboro facility. Given these factors, CPI personnel will have limited time to respond to the ICRs in a thorough and comprehensive manner. In order to insure an accurate and thorough resp onse CPI respectfully requests an additional fifty nine (89) days, until December 24, 2010, to complete the responses.

Please direct all future corresponden ce related to these ICRs to me at the address below with a copy to the General Manager of the Naval Station Energy Facility, Dave Sweigart, at the following address:

Naval Station Energy Facility

8835 Balboa Ave

Suite D San Diego, CA 92123

Please feel free to contact me wi th any questions you have regarding this correspondence. Thank you.

Matthew P. Speer

for

Chris Kopecky

Christopher L. Kopecky

Associate General Counsel Capital Power Operations (USA) Inc.
2000 York Road, Suite 129
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 (630) 413-5476 (630) 413-5477 (fax) ckopecky@capitalpowerusa.com
### §1455a. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §204, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 668

Section, act Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §815, 68 Stat. 647, required submission of specifications by applicants prior to award of any contract for construction of a project and submission of data with respect to acquisition of land prior to authorization to purchase such land.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgewater Foods International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I,
Robert Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date:  January
20, 2009





/s/  Robert
Saunders


Robert
Saunders,


Chief
Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.23a Director of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis and Chief Economist.

The Director of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis and Chief Economist serves as economic advisor to the Commission and its staff and is responsible to the Commission for sound economic analysis of market events and conditions; economic analysis in support of Commission rulemaking; economic and risk analysis to inform and support the Commission's enforcement actions and its examination program; development of financial and market data analysis tools; preparation of economic statistics; promotion of data standards; review and guidance of staff research and publications; and assisting the Commission and its staff in responding to policy, legislative, or international issues relating to securities markets.

[86 FR 9443, Feb. 16, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.7a-30 Identification of material incorporated; form of incorporation.

In each case of incorporation by reference, the matter incorporated shall be clearly identified in the reference. An express statement shall be made to the effect that the specified matter is incorporated in the application, statement or report at the particular place where the information is required.
No. 16-007 February 11, 2016

CONTACT: Eric Stahl, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Supplement to Environmental Study 

of LaSalle Nuclear Plant License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a draft report on the 

environmental impacts of renewing the operating license of the LaSalle nuclear power plant in Illinois. 

The draft report contains the NRC staff’s preliminary conclusion that the environmental impacts would 

not preclude renewing the license for an additional 20 years of operation. 

NRC staff will hold a public meeting on March 22, from 7-9 p.m., in Ottawa, Ill., to present the 

draft report’s findings and accept public comment. The meeting will be at the LaSalle County 

Emergency Operations Center, 711 E. Etna Rd. 

LaSalle County Station, located 11 miles southeast of Ottawa, has two boiling-water reactors.

The operator, Exelon Generation Co. Inc., submitted the renewal application on December 9, 2014. 

The NRC’s review of the application consists of a technical safety review and the 

environmental review. The draft supplemental impact statement is supplement 57 to NUREG-1437, 

Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It is now available on 

the NRC’s website. 

In a related Federal Register notice published on Feb. 11, the NRC provided detailed 

instructions on how to submit written comments on the draft supplemental environmental impact 

statement. Comments will be accepted through April 4. 

The LaSalle license renewal application and general information about reactor license renewal

are available on the NRC website.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6369

PERRY RUSSELL EVERETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-1216-H)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry Russell Everett, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Everett v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1216-H

(D. Md. Feb. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 17

[Docket No. FAA-2004-19333; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-62]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Warrensburg, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Warrensburg, MO.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 29, 2004 
(69 FR 63063) and subsequently published a correction to the direct 
final rule on November 16, 2004 (69 FR 67052). The FAA uses the direct 
final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA 
believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct 
final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this 
notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on 
that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 30, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-27223 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Schedule of Indemnification Agreements



 Exhibit 10.12 
  
 Indemnification Agreements in effect as of January 13, 2006 
  
 Tom A. Alberg 
 Christopher T. Bayley 
 William C. Britts 
 Lisa A. Clarke 
 Jon W. Gacek 
 Frank M. (“Pete”) Higgins 
 John W. Stanton 
 Charles H. Stonecipher 
 Peter H. van Oppen 
 Walter F.
Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-19329; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-58]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule, confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Imperial, NE.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 26, 2004 (69 FR 62402). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 30, 2004.

Anthony D. Roetzel,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-27221  Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 302.100 Definitions. For purposes of §§ 302.100 through 302.107, the following terms shall have the following meanings: ( a ) *Appointment date.* The term *appointment date* means the date of the appointment of the Corporation as receiver for a covered financial company that is a covered broker or dealer. This date shall constitute the *filing date* as that term is used in SIPA.
( b ) *Bridge broker or dealer.* The term *bridge broker or dealer* means a new financial company organized by the Corporation in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 5390(h) for the purpose of resolving a covered broker or dealer.
( c ) *Commission.* The term *Commission* means the Securities and Exchange Commission.
( d ) *Covered broker or dealer.* The term *covered broker or dealer* means a covered financial company that is a qualified broker or dealer.
( e ) *Customer.* The term *customer* of a covered broker or dealer shall have the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 78 lll (2) *provided that* the references therein to *debtor* shall mean the covered broker or dealer.
( f ) *Customer name securities.* The term *customer name securities* shall have the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 78 lll (3) *provided that* the references therein to *debtor* shall mean the covered broker or dealer and the references therein to *filing date* shall mean the appointment date.
( g ) *Customer property.* The term *customer property* shall have the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 78 lll (4) *provided that* the references therein to *debtor* shall mean the covered broker or dealer.
( h ) *Net equity.* The term *net equity* shall have the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 78 lll (11) *provided that* the references therein to *debtor* shall mean the covered broker or dealer and the references therein to *filing date* shall mean the appointment date.
( i ) *Qualified broker or dealer.* The term *qualified broker or dealer* means a broker or dealer that (A) is registered with the Commission under Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(b)); and (B) is a member of SIPC.
( j ) *SIPA.* The term *SIPA* means the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. 78aaa-*lll.*
( k ) *SIPC.* The term *SIPC* means the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
( l ) *Corporation.* The term *Corporation* means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
( m ) *Dodd-Frank Act.* The term *Dodd-Frank Act* means the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, enacted July 21, 2010.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, John C. Pound, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2007 of RedEnvelope,Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: February 13, 2008     By:  */s/*JOHN C. POUND   *John C. Pound*   *Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Shirley L. Tyler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                  Date: November 10, 2005      By:  /s/ Shirley L. Tyler    Shirley L. Tyler, Executive Vice President    and Treasurer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.