alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0707. CHRISTY L. GRAILER v. SHANNON D. JONES.

Christy L. Grailer, on behalf of her minor child, filed a petition for a family

violence protective order against her ex-husband, the child’s father, Shannon D.

Jones. Following a hearing, Grailer’s petition was dismissed. Thereafter, the trial

court awarded Jones attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14, finding that Grailer

had brought the petition solely to harass Jones. Grailer then filed this direct appeal.

We lack jurisdiction.

Appeals of ordersin domestic relations cases – including actions arising under

the Family Violence Act – must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2); Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1)

(510 SE2d 810) (1999). Moreover, an appeal from a trial court order awarding § 9-

15-14 attorney fees must also be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10); Capricorn Systems, Inc. v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga.

App. 840, 841-842 (560 SE2d 730) (2002). “Compliance with the discretionary

appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.

App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). 

Grailer’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

December 07, 2018
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/07/2018
3445.302 Contracts with foreign

governments or international organizations.

Requests by, or for the benefit of, foreign governments or international organizations to use ED

production and research property must be approved by the HCA. The HCA must determine the

amount of cost to be recovered or rental charged, if any, based on the facts and circumstances of

each case.

Parent topic: Subpart 3445.3—Authorizing the Use and Rental of Government Property
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 24
- 0517 LT Case No. 1993
- CF
- 004491 -A

_____________________________ A RTAVIOUS C OTTON , Appella nt, v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ 3 .800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salvador , Judge . Arta vious Cotton, Arcadia, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General and Miranda L. Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. M arch 19, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). E DWARDS , C.J., B OATWRIGHT , and K ILBANE , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

p0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

144394

PREMIER CENTER OF CANTON, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144394

COA: 297799

NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY Wayne CC: 08-017780-CK

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third- Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

and 

ASPHALT SPECIALISTS, INC.,

Defendant/Cross-Defendant- Appellant,

and 

LOU’S TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., d/b/a

RENTAL SPECIALISTS, L.L.C., LOU’S SCRAP

TRANSPORT, INC., TKMS, LTD., DANIEL

ISRAEL and BRUCE ISRAEL,

Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 4.16 Prohibited representations.

It shall be unlawful for any commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, principal thereof or person who solicits therefor to represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that such commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor has been sponsored, recommended or approved, or that its abilities or qualifications have in any respect been passed upon, by the Commission, the Federal government or any agency thereof.
EASA AD Cancellation Notice No.: 2009-0219-CN

EASA Form 116 Page 1/1 

## EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE CANCELLATION NOTICE AD No.: 2009-0219-CN

Date: 12 October 2009 Note: This Airworthiness Directive Cance llation Notice is issued by EASA, acting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and of the European third countri es that participate in the activities of EASA under Article 66 of that Regulation. 

### Type Approval Holder’s Name: ROLLS-ROYCE PLC Type/Model designation(s): RB211 Trent 700 series turbofan engines TCDS Number: EASA.E.042 Foreign AD: Not applicable Cancellation: Cancels CAA UK AD 008-03-97. 

### ATA 78 Thrust reverser – C-duct – Inspection of rear hinge lugs
Manufacturer(s): Rolls-Royce plc. Applicability: Models RB211 Trent 768- 60, 772-60, 772B-60 and 772C-60 engines. These engines are known to be insta lled on, but not limited to, Airbus A330 series aeroplanes. Reason: CAA UK AD 008-03-97 and DG AC France AD 1997-118-047 were both issued in order to prevent structur al damage of the thrust reversers’ opening mechanism. To avoid having two ADs addressing the same unsafe condition, EASA has decided to retain DGAC France AD 1997-118-047 and cancel CAA UK AD 008-03-97. Effective Date: 12 October 2009 Compliance Not applicable Ref. Publications: DGAC AD 1997-118-047, dated 30 September 2009. Remarks: 1. Enquiries regarding this AD Cancellation Notice should be referred to the AD Focal Point - Airworthiness Directives, Safety Management & Research Section, Certification Directorate, EASA. E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu 2. For any questions concerning the technical content of this AD Cancellation Notice, please contact: Rolls-Royce plc . PO Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom. Phone: +44 (0) 1332 242424, Fax: +44 (0) 1332 249936.
exv10w6



 





Exhibit
10.6



AMENDMENT TO S-76 NEW HELICOPTER SALES AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of the Acceptance Date stated below, by and between the Sikorsky
Contracting Entity (“Sikorsky”) named below and the Buyer named below, hereby amends the S-76 New
Helicopter Sales Agreement between the parties as follows:




1. Definitions/Information for this Amendment




	 	 	 
	Buyer:

	 	Offshore Logistics, Inc.
	Sikorsky Contracting Entity:

	 	Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
	Sikorsky Contract No.:

	 	S76TD02065
	Amendment No.:

	 	5






     2. Amendment — Amend the S-76 Sales Agreements as follows:




	 	 	In Article I, Option 1 Aircraft, add the following sentence: In the event that
Buyer orders additional aircraft in 2004 under this Option 1, the quantity of
Option 1 aircraft ordered in 2004 shall offset the same quantity of aircraft
under Buyer’s obligation for Finn Aircraft in 2005.






	3.	 	Reaffirmation — Except as modified above, all of the provisions of
the Agreement remain the same, and the Agreement as modified hereby,
is reaffirmed.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by each party’s authorized
representative.



	 	 	 
	Offshore Logistics, Inc.:

	 	Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation:
	By: /s/ Michael R. Suldo

	 	By: /s/ Marc Poland
	Name: Michael R. Suldo

	 	Name: Marc B. Poland
	Title: General Manager, Air Logistics

	 	Title: Director, Business Operations
	Date: July 12, 2004

	 	Date: July 13, 2004
### §1973c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973c was editorially reclassified as section 10304 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### §16915a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16915a was editorially reclassified as section 20916 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1686

STACY FACEMIRE , Plaintiff

- Appellant , and HEATHER MORRIS; PAMELA STUMPF; LULA V. DICKERSON; LISA WILKINSON; KATHRYN A. BRADLEY , Plaintiffs ,

v. WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS; CHIEF JUSTICE TIMOTHY PAUL ARMSTEAD, in his official capacity as Chief Justice , Defendants

- Appellees , and
COMMISSION ON SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS; JIM JUSTICE; JOHN B. MCCUSKEY; PATRICK MORRISEY; JOHN PERDUE; MAC WARNER; WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE; WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; WEST VIRGINIA STATE AUDITOR ’ S OFFICE; WEST VIRGINIA STATE OFFICE OF THE GOVE RNOR; WEST VIRGINIA STATE TREASURER ’ S OFFICE , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 5:19

- cv
- 00339

- JPB )2 Submitted : December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8, 2020

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

J. Michael Ranson , Cynthia M. Ranson , RANSON LAW OFFICES, PLLC , Charleston, West Virginia; G. Patrick Jacobs , LAW OFFICE OF G. PATRICK JACOBS, LC , Charleston, West Virginia; Teresa C. Toriseva , TORISEVA LAW , Wheeling, West Virginia; Robert G. McCoid , MCCOID LAW OFFICES, PLLC , Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants. Bryan R. Cokeley, Mark C. Dean, Robert L. Bailey, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Stacy Facemire appeals from the district court’s order dis missing her suit as barred by claim and issue preclusion. In her opening brief, Facemire fails to challenge the basis for the district court’s order. Even after being alerted to her failure in Appellee s’ brief,
Facemire still did not address res judicata in her reply brief. Accordingly, we conclude that Facemire has waived any objection to the district court’s conclusions. See
Suarez

- Valenzuela v. Holder , 714 F.3d 241, 248

- 49 (4th Cir. 2013) (citing Fed. R. App. P. 28( a)). As such, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §17952. Regulatory references

Each reference in this subchapter to a provision of the Code of Federal Regulations refers to such provision as in effect on February 17, 2009 (or to the most recent update of such provision).

(Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title XIII, §13422, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle D (§13400 et seq.) of title XIII of div. A of Pub. L. 111–5, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 258, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle D to the Code, see Tables.
### §17131. Training Federal contracting officers to negotiate energy efficiency contracts

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall create and administer in the Federal Energy Management Program a training program to educate Federal contract negotiation and contract management personnel so that the contract officers are prepared to—

(1) negotiate energy savings performance contracts;

(2) conclude effective and timely contracts for energy efficiency services with all companies offering energy efficiency services; and

(3) review Federal contracts for all products and services for the potential energy efficiency opportunities and implications of the contracts.

#### (b) Schedule

Not later than 1 year after December 19, 2007, the Secretary shall plan, staff, announce, and begin training under the Federal Energy Management Program.

#### (c) Personnel to be trained

Personnel appropriate to receive training under the Federal Energy Management Program shall be selected by and sent for the training from—

(1) the Department of Defense;

(2) the Department of Veterans Affairs;

(3) the Department;

(4) the General Services Administration;

(5) the Department of Housing and Urban Development;

(6) the United States Postal Service; and

(7) all other Federal agencies and departments that enter contracts for buildings, building services, electricity and electricity services, natural gas and natural gas services, heating and air conditioning services, building fuel purchases, and other types of procurement or service contracts determined by the Secretary, in carrying out the Federal Energy Management Program, to offer the potential for energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions if negotiated with taking into account those goals.

#### (d) Trainers

Training under the Federal Energy Management Program may be conducted by—

(1) attorneys or contract officers with experience in negotiating and managing contracts described in subsection (c)(7) from any agency, except that the Secretary shall reimburse the related salaries and expenses of the attorneys or contract officers from amounts made available for carrying out this section to the extent the attorneys or contract officers are not employees of the Department; and

(2) private experts hired by the Secretary for the purposes of this section, except that the Secretary may not hire experts who are simultaneously employed by any company under contract to provide energy efficiency services to the Federal Government.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $750,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §517, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1659.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
§ 270.0-4 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) *Registration statements and reports.* Except as provided by this section or in the appropriate form, information may be incorporated by reference in answer, or partial answer, to any item of a registration statement or report. Where an item requires a summary or outline of the provisions of any document, the summary or outline may incorporate by reference particular items, sections, or paragraphs of any exhibit and may be qualified in its entirety by such reference.
( b ) *Financial information.* Except as provided in the Commission's rules, financial information required to be given in comparative form for two or more fiscal years or periods must not be incorporated by reference unless the information incorporated by reference includes the entire period for which the comparative data is given. In the financial statements, incorporating by reference, or cross-referencing to, information outside of the financial statements is not permitted unless otherwise specifically permitted or required by the Commission's rules or by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, whichever is applicable.
( c ) *Exhibits.* Any document or part thereof, including any financial statement or part thereof, filed with the Commission pursuant to any Act administered by the Commission may be incorporated by reference as an exhibit to any registration statement, application, or report filed with the Commission by the same or any other person. If any modification has occurred in the text of any document incorporated by reference since the filing thereof, the registrant must file with the reference a statement containing the text of any such modification and the date thereof.
( d ) *Hyperlinks.* Include an active hyperlink to information incorporated into a registration statement, application, or report by reference if such information is publicly available on the Commission's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (“EDGAR”) at the time the registration statement, application, or report is filed. For hyperlinking to exhibits, please refer to the appropriate form.
( e ) *General.* Include an express statement clearly describing the specific location of the information you are incorporating by reference. The statement must identify the document where the information was originally filed or submitted and the location of the information within that document. The statement must be made at the particular place where the information is required, if applicable. Information must not be incorporated by reference in any case where such incorporation would render the disclosure incomplete, unclear, or confusing. For example, unless expressly permitted or required, disclosure must not be incorporated by reference from a second document if that second document incorporates information pertinent to such disclosure by reference to a third document.
[84 FR 12732, Apr. 2, 2019]
§ 37.1301 General requirements. ( a ) A swap execution facility shall maintain financial resources on an ongoing basis that are adequate to enable it to comply with the core principles set forth in section 5h of the Act and any applicable Commission regulations. Financial resources shall be considered adequate if their value exceeds the total amount that would enable the swap execution facility to cover its projected operating costs necessary for the swap execution facility to comply with section 5h of the Act and applicable Commission regulations for a one-year period, as calculated on a rolling basis pursuant to § 37.1304.
( b ) An entity that operates as both a swap execution facility and a derivatives clearing organization shall also comply with the financial resource requirements of § 39.11 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15Fb2-5 Registration of successor to registered security-based swap dealer or a major security-based swap participant. ( a ) In the event that a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant succeeds to and continues the business of a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant registered pursuant to Section 15F(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-10(b)), the registration of the predecessor shall be deemed to remain effective as the registration of the successor if the successor, within 30 days after such succession, files an application for registration in accordance with § 240.15Fb2-1, and the predecessor files a notice of withdrawal from registration on Form SBSE-W (§ 249.1601 of this chapter).
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, if a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant succeeds to and continues the business of a registered predecessor security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant, and the succession is based solely on a change in the predecessor's date or state of incorporation, form of organization, or composition of a partnership, the successor may, within 30 days after the succession, amend the registration of the predecessor security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant on Form SBSE (§ 249.1600 of this chapter), Form SBSE-A (§ 249.1600a of this chapter), or Form SBSE-BD (§ 249.1600b of this chapter), as appropriate, to reflect these changes. This amendment shall be deemed an application for registration filed by the predecessor and adopted by the successor.
September 11, 2015 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Mr. Chairman 

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of July 15, 2015, which discusses concerns you and colleagues have regarding the NRC 

staff’s use of qualitative factors to justify new regulatory requirements that are not cost-justified 

under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.109, commonly referred to as the 

“Backfit Rule.” Responses to your specific questions are enclosed. The Commission 

recognizes your concerns on this issue, and we will consider them as we deliberate on the 

matters before us. On August 25, 2015, the Commission reiterated its support for ongoing staff 

efforts to address the cumulative effects of regulation and for the consideration of risk insights in 

regulatory decision making and indicated that the staff should use its existing authorities to 

ensure that the NRC's regulatory actions are properly prioritized, taking into account risk 

information. 

If you need any additional information, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of 

the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelly Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable David Vitter 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable John Barrasso 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Mike Crapo 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable John Boozman 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Jeff Sessions 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Deb Fischer 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable M. Michael Rounds 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510