alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Emil Petermann, Respondent, for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, v. Wm. Steiner Sons & Company, Employer, and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Limited, Insurance Carrier, Appellants.

Award unanimously affirmed on the authority of *Marhoffer*v. *Marhoffer (ante,*p. 52), decided at this term of court.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.44

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                   TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF
                     WASTE ROCK FROM THE JOHNSON CAMP MINE"

This document is an amendment ("Amendment") to the "Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Waste Rock from the Johnson Camp Mine" dated December 23, 2004
("Agreement") between Nord Resources Corporation ("Seller") and JC Rock, LLC
("Purchaser").

A) Seller and Purchaser hereby agree to extend the term of the Agreement to June
30, 2005. Should one of Purchaser's customers be awarded the contract to supply
60,000 tons of rock for the "Tombstone" contract on or before May 30, 2005, the
term of the Agreement shall be extended to July 31, 2005. The Agreement may be
additionally extended by special arrangement on specific contracts at the sole
discretion of Seller.

B) Seller hereby agrees to reduce the royalty from $2.00 per ton to $1.00 per
ton only on fines and rock sold by Purchaser to individuals, companies or
organizations where the sales price to such individuals or companies is less
than $6.00 per ton, FOB Johnson Camp.

C) Purchaser hereby acknowledges that the Agreement is non-exclusive and Seller
has the right to sell any and all Johnson Camp rock that is not in Purchaser's
inventory to any individual, company or organization during the term of the
Agreement.

Dated December 28, 2004

NORD RESOURCES CORPORATION               JC ROCK, LLC


By: /s/ Kathy Glidewell                  By: /s/ James L. Rodman
    ----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
Title: Secretary                         Title: Member
§ 38.1000 Core Principle 19. Unless necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this Act, the board of trade shall not: ( a ) Adopt any rule or taking any action that results in any unreasonable restraint of trade; or
( b ) Impose any material anticompetitive burden on trading on the contract market.
§ 230.471 Signatures to amendments. ( a ) Except as provided in Rule 447 (§ 230.447) and in Rule 478 (§ 230.478), every amendment to a registration statement shall be signed by the persons specified in section 6(a) of the Act. At least one copy of every amendment filed with the Commission shall be signed. Unsigned copies shall be conformed.
( b ) Where the Act or the rules thereunder require a document filed with or furnished to the Commission to be signed, such document shall be manually signed, or signed using either typed signatures or duplicated or facsimile versions of manual signatures. Where typed, duplicated, or facsimile signatures are used, each signatory to the filing shall manually or electronically sign a signature page or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting his or her signature that appears in the filing (“authentication document”). Such authentication document shall be executed before or at the time the filing is made and shall be retained by the registrant for a period of five years. The requirements set forth in § 232.302(b) must be met with regards to the use of an electronically signed authentication document pursuant to this paragraph (b). Upon request, the registrant shall furnish to the Commission or its staff a copy of any or all documents retained pursuant to this section.
[47 FR 11445, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 30402, June 14, 1996; 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011; 85 FR 78228, Dec. 4, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.14Ad-1 Report of proxy voting record. ( a ) Subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, every institutional investment manager (as that term is defined in section 13(f)(6)(A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(f)(6)(A))) that is required to file reports under section 13(f) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(f)) must file an annual report on Form N-PX (§§ 249.326 and 274.129 of this chapter) not later than August 31 of each year, for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, containing the institutional investment manager's proxy voting record for each shareholder vote pursuant to sections 14A(a) and (b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78n-1(a) and (b)) with respect to each security over which the manager exercised voting power (as defined in paragraph (d) of this section).
( b ) An institutional investment manager is not required to file a report on Form N-PX (§§ 249.326 and 274.129 of this chapter) for the 12-month period ending June 30 of the calendar year in which the manager's initial filing on Form 13F (§ 249.325 of this chapter) is due pursuant to § 240.13f-1. For purposes of this paragraph (b), “initial filing” on Form 13F means any quarterly filing on Form 13F if no filing on Form 13F was required for the immediately preceding calendar quarter.
( c ) An institutional investment manager is not required to file a report on Form N-PX (§§ 249.326 and 274.129 of this chapter) with respect to any shareholder vote at a meeting that occurs after September 30 of the calendar year in which the manager's final filing on Form 13F (§ 249.325 of this chapter) is due pursuant to § 240.13f-1. An institutional investment manager is required to file a Form N-PX for the period July 1 through September 30 of the calendar year in which the manager's final filing on Form 13F is due pursuant to § 240.13f-1; this filing is required to be made not later than March 1 of the immediately following calendar year. For purposes of this paragraph (c), “final filing” on Form 13F means any quarterly filing on Form 13F if no filing on Form 13F is required for the immediately subsequent calendar quarter.
( d ) For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Voting power* means the ability, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship, to vote a security or direct the voting of a security, including the ability to determine whether to vote a security or to recall a loaned security.
( 2 ) *Exercise* of voting power means using voting power to influence a voting decision with respect to a security.
[87 FR 78808, Dec. 22, 2022]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Curtis Freeman and Jerome Davis, Appellants.

Judgments unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  by  Millstream
Acquisition  Corporation (the "Company") on the date hereof, Arthur Spector, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lynda R. Guinan, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted:

1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
     2004 (the "Periodic  Report"),  to which this  Certification is attached as
     Exhibit  32,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company.


Dated: August 13, 2004

                                 /s/ Arthur Spector
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                 /s/ Lynda R. Guinan
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       17


<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 19, 2011

h1012 

# Order

October 19, 2011

142897

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142897 COA: 301390 RANDALL ARNAZZ DURR, Wayne CC: 06-000099 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered an d, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v Vaughn (Docket No. 142627) is pending on a ppeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may re solve an issue raised in the pr esent application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.
### Part A—Governmental Interest in Aeronautics Research and Development
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.5a-2 General requirements as to form and content of statements of eligibility and qualification.

Rules 7a-15 through 7a-37 (§§ 260.7a-15 through 260.7a-37 of this chapter) under section 307 under the Trust Indenture Act shall be applicable to statements filed on Forms T-1, T-2, and T-6.

[56 FR 22320, May 15, 1991]
North Dakota Regional Haze Proposed Rule

Copyright and CBI List for Administrative Record 99 Hartenstein Attachments

Number Copyright

1 Enclosure 3, Part 3; Documentation of Administrative Record.

2 Technical Publication: Coal

‐ Fired SCR Operating Experience with High Removal Efficiency and

Low

‐ NOx Firing Systems; C. Erickson; E. Pear; S. Straight; L. Hutcheson; Riley Power Inc., LG&E

Energy Corp., Duke Energy; 2003.

3 NOx Control Field Test Results on Coal

‐ Fired Cyclone Boilers

– CNCIG Programs; EPRI; Palo

Alto, CA: 1999. TR

‐ 113643.

4 Exclusive Analysis of TXU Court Decision; S. Blankinship, Power Engineering ; PennWell

Corporation, Tulsa, OK; 2008.

5 Regeneration of DeNOx

– Catalysts, Referenzen; Ebinger

‐ Kat GmbH.

6 Selective Catalytic Reduction for Coal

‐ Fired Power Plants: Feasibility and Economics; T.K.

Bauer and R.G. Spendle, Stearns

‐ Roger Engineering Corporation ; Electric Power Research

Institute, Inc., 1984.

7 Impacts of Texas Lignite Coal on SCR Catalyst Life and Performance: Field Data From TXU’s

Martin Lake Plant: Post

‐ Combustion NOx Control Program; Electric Power Research Institute

(EPRI), Inc., 2003.

8 Impacts of Texas Lignite Coal on SCR Catalyst Life and Performance: Field Data From TXU’s

Martin Lake Plant: Technical Report; Electric Power Research Institute, (EPRI) Inc., 2003

9 Utility E

‐ Alert; #868

– April 4, 2008; McIlvaine Company, 2008

10 Utility E

‐ Alert; #870

– April 18, 2008; McIlvaine Company, 2008

11 Utility E

‐ Alert; #871

– April 25, 2008; McIlvaine Company, 2008

12 Utility E

‐ Alert; #874

– May 16, 2008; McIlvaine Company, 2008

Number CBI

1 July 18, 2007, E

‐ mail Steve Moorman to Bob Balkley

2 Draft; Technical Feasibility and Cost of SCR NOx Control in Utility Applications; Prepared by:

United Engineers and Constructors, Inc. and Stearns

‐ Roger; Prepared for: Electric Power

Research Institute (EPRI) Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL 

RIGHTS AS TO: I. M. H., A MINOR. 

No. 84949 

FILE 

NOV 1 0 2022 

ROCHELLE H., 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 

FAMILY SERVICES; AND I. M. H., A 

MINOR, 

Respondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order terminating 

appellant's parental rights. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; 

Cynthia N. Giuliani, Judge. 

Since the docketing of this appeal on June 30, 2022, two notices 

issued by the clerk of this court and one order entered by this court and 

addressed to appellant have been returned by the postal service as 

undeliverable.' The postal service noted that it was unable to forward any 

of the documents. The opening brief was due to be filed by October 17, 2022. 

Appellant has not filed the opening brief, or any other documents in this 

matter, and has not otherwise communicated with this court. Under these 

"A copy of one order entered by this court and addressed to appellant 

was not returned as undeliverable. 

22-r-Joc;(2_ 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

10) I947A 
circumstances, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal and 

this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

, J. 

Hardesty 

4.414,G4-0 J. , J. 

Stiglich Herndon 

cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge 

Rochelle H. 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Inc. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

N E VA D A 

1947A
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alexander V. Lagerborg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB by ACROSS AMERICA REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP.;

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of ACROSS AMERICA REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for ACROSS AMERICA
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP and have:

     i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;

     ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
CORP.'s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

     iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP. auditors and the
audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

     i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
CORP.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP.'s auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

     ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and

6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or
not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: 8/13/04


                            /s/ Alexander V. Lagerborg
                            --------------------------
                            Alexander V. Lagerborg, Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
From: John Nord [mailto:manager@devilslakeairport.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 20111:28 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Great Lakes Aviation--EAS Contract 

Dennis, 

Please find the attached e-mail from the Mayor of Devils lake, Dick Johnson, supporting the decision for Great lakes 

Aviation to receive the Essential Air Contract for the DVl route. The Devils Lake Airport is in support of Great Lakes 

Aviation as the EAS carrier for DVl and looks forward to working with them. Their proposed schedule will serve the 

needs of our community and region. Thank you for your help and support in resolving this issue. 

Thanks 

JOHN 

John l\!L Nord 

Airpmt Manager 

Devils Lake Regional Airport 

I 06 National Guard St. NW 

Devils Lake, ND 58301 

Tel: 70 l-662-5833 

Fax: 701-662-5133 

From: Dick Johnson [mailto:dick@lrlec.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 201111:38 AM 

To: 'John Nord' 

Subject: RE: Great Lakes EAS contract 

John, 

-/) 

I have read through your email and can confirm that as the Mayor of the City of Devils Lake, I am in agreement and 

concur with your thoughts and that of the Devils Lake Airport Authority regarding the arrangements for air service to Devils 

Lake and the lake region. We need to thank all parties involved for their help and assistance in solving this most 

unfortunate situation. Thanks to the combined effort we are getting this to resolution. 

Dick Johnson, 

Mayor, City of Devils Lake 

1
### §15026. Federal and non-Federal share

#### (a) Aggregate cost

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), the Federal share of the cost of all projects in a State supported by an allotment to the State under this part may not be more than 75 percent of the aggregate necessary cost of such projects, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (2) Urban or rural poverty areas

In the case of projects whose activities or products target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in urban or rural poverty areas, as determined by the Secretary, the Federal share of the cost of all such projects may not be more than 90 percent of the aggregate necessary cost of such projects, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (3) State plan activities

In the case of projects undertaken by the Council or Council staff to implement State plan activities, the Federal share of the cost of all such projects may be not more than 100 percent of the aggregate necessary cost of such activities.

#### (b) Nonduplication

In determining the amount of any State's Federal share of the cost of such projects incurred by such State under a State plan approved under section 15024 of this title, the Secretary shall not consider—

(1) any portion of such cost that is financed by Federal funds provided under any provision of law other than section 15022 of this title; and

(2) the amount of any non-Federal funds required to be expended as a condition of receipt of the Federal funds described in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Non-Federal share

#### (1) In-kind contributions

The non-Federal share of the cost of any project supported by an allotment under this part may be provided in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including plant, equipment, or services.

#### (2) Contributions of political subdivisions and public or private entities

#### (A) In general

Contributions to projects by a political subdivision of a State or by a public or private entity under an agreement with the State shall, subject to such limitations and conditions as the Secretary may by regulation prescribe under section 15004(b) of this title, be considered to be contributions by such State, in the case of a project supported under this part.

#### (B) State contributions

State contributions, including contributions by the designated State agency to provide support services to the Council pursuant to section 15025(d)(4) of this title, may be counted as part of such State's non-Federal share of the cost of projects supported under this part.

#### (3) Variations of the non-Federal share

The non-Federal share required of each recipient of a grant from a Council under this part may vary.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §126, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1710.)
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15c6-2 Same-day allocation, confirmation, and affirmation. ( a ) Any broker or dealer engaging in the allocation, confirmation, or affirmation process with another party or parties to achieve settlement of a securities transaction that is subject to the requirements of § 240.15c6-1(a) shall: ( 1 ) Enter into a written agreement with the relevant parties to ensure completion of the allocation, confirmation, affirmation, or any combination thereof, for the transaction as soon as technologically practicable and no later than the end of the day on trade date in such form as necessary to achieve settlement of the transaction; or
( 2 ) Establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure completion of the allocation, confirmation, affirmation, or any combination thereof, for the transaction as soon as technologically practicable and no later than the end of the day on trade date in such form as necessary to achieve settlement of the transaction.
( b ) To ensure completion of the allocation, confirmation, affirmation, or any combination thereof for the transaction as soon as technologically practicable and no later than the end of the day on trade date, the reasonably designed written policies and procedures required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Identify and describe any technology systems, operations, and processes that the broker or dealer uses to coordinate with other relevant parties, including investment advisers and custodians, to ensure completion of the allocation, confirmation, or affirmation process for the transaction;
( 2 ) Set target time frames on trade date for completing the allocation, confirmation, and affirmation for the transaction;
( 3 ) Describe the procedures that the broker or dealer will follow to ensure the prompt communication of trade information, investigate any discrepancies in trade information, and adjust trade information to help ensure that the allocation, confirmation, and affirmation can be completed by the target time frames on trade date;
( 4 ) Describe how the broker or dealer plans to identify and address delays if another party, including an investment adviser or a custodian, is not promptly completing the allocation or affirmation for the transaction, or if the broker or dealer experiences delays in promptly completing the confirmation; and
( 5 ) Measure, monitor, and document the rates of allocations, confirmations, and affirmations completed as soon as technologically practicable and no later than the end of the day on trade date.
[88 FR 13953, Mar. 6, 2023]
#### In the Matter of 47th Street Restaurant Corp., Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the New York State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.