alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2486a to 2486i. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 2486a, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §203, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 869, related to congressional statement of purposes. See section 40301 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 2486b, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §204, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 870, related to definitions. See section 40302 of Title 51.

Section 2486c, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §205, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 871, related to national space grant college and fellowship program. See section 40303 of Title 51.

Section 2486d, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §206, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 872, related to grants or contracts. See section 40304 of Title 51.

Section 2486e, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §207, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 873, related to identification of specific national needs and problems relating to space and grants or contracts with respect to such needs or problems. See section 40305 of Title 51.

Section 2486f, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §208, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 873, related to space grant college and space grant regional consortium. See section 40306 of Title 51.

Section 2486g, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §209, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 874, related to space grant fellowship program. See section 40307 of Title 51.

Section 2486h, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §210, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 874, related to space grant review panel. See section 40308 of Title 51.

Section 2486i, Pub. L. 100–147, title II, §211, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 875, related to availability of other Federal personnel and data and cooperation with Administration. See section 40309 of Title 51.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.1702 Submission cover sheet, for rule and product submissions.

This submission cover sheet shall be used by registered security-based swap execution facilities for making submissions pursuant to §§ 242.804 through 242.807, 242.809, and 242.816).
§ 1101.33 Reasonable steps to assure information release is fair in the circumstances. ( a ) The steps set forth below are the steps the Commission has determined are reasonable to take to assure disclosure of information to the public is fair in the circumstances: ( 1 ) The Commission will accompany information disclosed to the public with the manufacturer's or private labeler's comments unless the manufacturer or private labeler asks in its section 6(b) comments that its comments or a designated portion thereof not accompany the information.
( 2 ) The Commission generally will accompany the disclosure of information with an explanatory statement that makes the nature of the information disclosed clear to the public. The Commission will also take reasonable steps to disclose any other relevant information it its possession that will assure disclosure is fair in the circumstances.
( 3 ) The Commission will limit the form of disclosure to that which it considers appropriate in the circumstances. For example, the Commission may determine it is not appropriate to issue a nationwide press release in a particular situation and rather will issue a press release directed at certain localities, regions, or user populations.
( 4 ) The Commission may delay disclosure of information in some circumstances. For example, the Commission may elect to postpone an information release until an investigation, analysis or test of a product is complete, rather than releasing information piecemeal.
( b ) The Commission will not disclose information when it determines that disclosure would not be fair in the circumstances. The following are examples of disclosures which generally would not be fair in the circumstances. ( 1 ) Disclosure of information furnished by a firm to facilitate prompt remedial action or settlement of a case when the firm has a reasonable expectation that the information will be maintained by the Commission in concidence.
( 2 ) Disclosure of notes or minutes of meetings to discuss or negotiate settlement agreements and of drafts of documents prepared during settlement negotiations, where the firm has a reasonable expectation that such written materials will be maintained by the Commission in confidence.
( 3 ) Disclosure of the work-product of attorneys employed by a firm and information subject to an attorney/client privilege, if the Commission has obtained the information from the client or the attorney, the attorney or client advises the Commission of the confidential nature of the information at the time it is submitted to the Commission, and the information has been maintained in confidence by the client and the attorney.
( 4 ) Disclosure of a firm's comments (or a portion thereof) submitted under section 6(b)(1) over the firm's objection.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, David
McCourt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


       Dated: January 16, 2007               /s/ David McCourt
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David McCourt
                                           Interim Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I
Mehboob Charania, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The  information  contained in the
Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
result of  operations of the Company.





/s/ Mehboob CharaniaMehboob
      CharaniaChief
      Executive Officer andDecember
      1, 2010
            Principal
      Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Como vivircon lupus.**
 
2018 | 2022
 
SuDoc Number: HE 20.3902:L97/6/SPAN.
Item Number:0508-T (online)
CGP systemNumber:001101182
 
July 22, 2019
#### § 610.1 Cross-reference.

The rules formerly at 16 CFR part 610 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR 1022.130, “Fair Credit Reporting (Regulation V).”
#### § 12.103 Filing of documents; subscription; service.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in these rules, all documents filed in a voluntary decisional proceeding, including (but not limited to) amended or supplemental pleadings, motions, discovery requests and responses thereto, and submissions of proof, shall meet the requirements of §§ 12.11 and 12.12 of the Reparation Rules as to form, and shall be filed and served in accordance with § 12.10 of the Reparation Rules.
### §2000h–2. Intervention by Attorney General; denial of equal protection on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin

Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance. In such action the United States shall be entitled to the same relief as if it had instituted the action.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title IX, §902, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 266; Pub. L. 92–318, title IX, §906(a), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 375.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–318 inserted "sex" after "religion,".
### §2123. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 102–190, div. C, title XXXI, §3136, Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1577; Pub. L. 103–35, title II, §203(b)(3), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 102, which related to critical technology partnerships between laboratories of the Department of Energy and other entities, was renumbered section 4813 of Pub. L. 107–314, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(k)(8), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1785, and transferred to section 2794 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation 
Research Committee, Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research 
Review Committee.
    Date: January 25-27, 2005.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Monterey, 1000 Aguajita Road, Monterey, CA 93940.
    Contact Person: Quirijn Vos. PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 451-2666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f687809985b6989f979f92d8989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80f1f6eff3c0eee9e1e9e4aeeee9e8aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26897 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No: I-15-009 March 27, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected 

Elizabeth Andrews as the new Resident Inspector at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant 

in Lacey Township, N.J. 

“Liz Andrews’ training and technical expertise will assist the NRC in carrying out 

its mission to protect people and the environment by ensuring the safe operation of Oyster 

Creek,” said NRC Region I Administrator Dan Dorman.

Andrews joined the Region I office in July 2012 after graduating from Villanova University with a 

bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering. She is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional 

Development Program and has completed a rigorous inspector qualification program. She was an acting 

Resident Inspector at the Beaver Valley nuclear plant. Most recently, she was a project engineer in the Region 

I Division of Reactor Projects. 

Andrews joins Senior Resident Inspector Amar Patel at Oyster Creek. Each U.S. commercial nuclear 

power plant site has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and 

the public.
### §17171. Thermal energy storage research and development program

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a program of research and development to provide lower cost and more viable thermal energy storage technologies to enable the shifting of electric power loads on demand and extend the operating time of concentrating solar power electric generating plants.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2009, $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2010, $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2011, and $12,000,000 for fiscal year 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §602, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1674.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.

#### Short Title

This part known as the "Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007", see Short Title note set out under section 17001 of this title.
#### Ronald Liquore et al., Appellants, v Tri-Arc Manufacturing Co., Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 246]

*906In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered May 31, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. On a motion for summary judgment, the initial burden is on the moving party to demonstrate, by admissible evidence, that there is no triable issue of material fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

Here, to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendant needed to submit evidence to demonstrate that the subject ladder was reasonably safe for its intended purpose *(cf. Voss v Black & Decker Mfg. Co.,*59 NY2d 102 [1983]). The defendant failed in this respect. The conclusory allegations of the defendant’s counsel and corporate officers were insufficient to establish that the subject ladder was reasonably safe for its intended purpose *(see Gardineer v Covino,*267 AD2d 200 [1999]; *Baluchinsky v General Motors Corp.,*248 AD2d 574, 575 [1998]). Furthermore, mere compliance with minimum industry standards is, at most, some evidence to be considered and is not a shield to liability *(see Sawyer v Dreis & Krump Mfg. Co.,*67 NY2d 328, 337 [1986]; *Mercogliano v Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*303 AD2d 566 [2003]; *Feiner v Calvin Klein, Ltd.,*157 AD2d 501, 502 [1990]).

Because the defendant failed to sustain its prima facie burden, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff and it was not necessary to consider the sufficiency of the opposing papers *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *cf. Vasta v Home Depot,*25 AD3d 690 [2006]; *Bosman v Reckson FS Ltd. Partnership,*15 AD3d 517 [2005]; *Karalic v City of New York,*307 AD2d 254, 255 [2003]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Petition	for	E xe mption July	9,2015

Transformed	Images,	Saratoga	NY 743	Plank	Rd Clifton	Park	NY,	12065 Ryan	Triller Cell:	(518) - 545 - 9462 Paul	Andreoli Cell:	(518) - 265 - 3590 Transformed.images@gmail.com Section	333	E xemption Transformed	Images from	Saratoga	NY	is	seeking	exemption	for	section	333. Our	company	mission	statement	is	to provide	the	general public	as	well	as	the commercial	market	with	high	quality	aerial photography	and	imaging	using	two primary	platforms.	The	two	platforms	that	we	currently	use	are	the	DJI	Phantom	2 plus	and	the	DJI	S - 1000. Our	PIC	has	over	20,000	hours	of	experience	with various	pod	and	boom platforms	as	well	as	multi - rotors.	All platforms	are	inspected	and	thoroughly checked	before	and	after	each	session	of	flight.	Batteries	and	sub equipment are kept	up	to	date,	along	with	all	software	for	each	platform’s	stabilization	a s	well	as GPS	software. Both	the	PO	and	AO	will	be accompanied	by	an observer to	guaranty	the	safe o peration in	compliance	with	LOS.	Conditions are	also	taken	into	consideration; weather	along	with	the	well being	of	the	AO	and	PO is always	taken	into	accou nt before	operation . All	platforms	have	been	applied	with	failsafe	procedures	in	order to	assure	the	safe	operation	of	the	platform	during	the	job.
3408.871 Paperwork reduction.       The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.208–72 (Paperwork Reduction Act) in all solicitations and contracts in which the contractor will develop forms or documents for public use.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3408.8—Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
### §1654. Persons excluded from benefits

This chapter shall not apply in respect to the injury or death of (1) an employee subject to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5; (2) an employee engaged in agriculture, domestic service, or any employment that is casual and not in the usual course of the trade, business, or profession of the employer; and (3) a master or member of a crew of any vessel.

(Aug. 16, 1941, ch. 357, §4, 55 Stat. 623.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5" substituted for reference to act Sept. 7, 1916 (39 Stat. 742), known as the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §19156. Existing activities

A Federal research agency may satisfy requirements under this part through activities and programs in existence as of August 9, 2022.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, §10506, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1612.)
1

The IJ’s decision, therefore, constitutes the final agency determination for

purposes of judicial review. See Kimumwe v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 319, 322 (8th Cir.

2005).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1604

___________

Sarah Nkurunungi, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board of

* Immigration Appeals.

Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General *

of the United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: September 6, 2006

Filed: September 11, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Nkurunungi, a citizen of Uganda, petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which summarily affirmed an Immigration

Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT).1
-2-

After careful review of the record, we conclude the IJ’s asylum decision--based

on the finding that Nkurunungi failed to establish a well-founded fear of future

persecution--is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See

Eta-Ndu v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 977, 982-83 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review).

Further, because Nkurunungi failed to meet the burden of proof on her asylum claim,

her claim for withholding of removal necessarily fails as well, see Turay v. Ashcroft,

405 F.3d 663, 667 (8th Cir. 2005) (withholding-of-removal standard is more rigorous

than asylum standard), and we see no basis in the record for CAT relief, see

Habtemicael v. Ashcroft, 370 F.3d 774, 780-82 (8th Cir. 2004) (discussing

considerations relevant to relief under CAT).

Accordingly, we deny the petition. We also deny Nkurunungi’s motion to

supplement the record. We previously granted Nkurunungi’s motion for stay of her

removal and voluntary-departure period; the remaining period in which she may

voluntarily depart the United States shall begin to run when our mandate in this case

is issued, see Falaja v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 889, 899-900 (8th Cir. 2005).

______________________________
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.16a Inspector General. ( a ) Under the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, (5 U.S.C. app.) the Inspector General performs independent and objective investigations and audits relating to the Commission's programs and operations. An investigation seeks to detect and prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the Commission's programs and operations, such as violations of federal statutes or regulations by contractors and Commission employees or the Standards Of Ethical Conduct For Employees of the Executive Branch. An audit seeks to determine whether: ( 1 ) Program goals and results identified in enabling legislation are achieved.
( 2 ) Resources are efficiently and economically used and managed.
( 3 ) Financial operations are properly conducted.
( 4 ) Financial reports are fairly presented.
( 5 ) Applicable laws and regulations are complied with.
( b ) In cooperation with Commission management, the Inspector General generally promotes economy, efficiency, and the effectiveness of waste or fraud detection and prevention in the Commission's programs and operations. The Inspector General also keeps the Congress and the Commission informed about problems and deficiencies in the Commission's programs and operations.
( c ) The Inspector General reports to the Commission, but is independent of all other Commission management. In addition, the Inspector General independently prepares semi-annual reports to the Congress.
( d ) With respect to misconduct of Commission employees and contractors, the Inspector General, after consultation with the Ethics Counsel, where appropriate, serves as the Commission's liaison with other federal audit and investigative agencies, such as the Department of Justice and the Executive Council on Integrity and Efficiency.
( e ) Subpoenas issued in the course of an audit or investigation conducted by the Office of the Inspector General shall be effected by any method prescribed by § 201.232(a) and (c) of this chapter.
[60 FR 14625, Mar. 20, 1995, as amended at 77 FR 8095, Feb. 14, 2012]