alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Frank S. Peters, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sardy House,LLC;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: February 13, 2004
 /S/ FRANK S. PETERS
### §18933. Software security and authentication

#### (a) Vulnerabilities in open source software

The Director shall assign severity metrics to identified vulnerabilities with open source software and produce voluntary guidance to assist the entities that maintain open source software repositories to discover and mitigate vulnerabilities.

#### (b) Artificial intelligence-enabled defenses

The Director shall carry out research and testing to improve the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-enabled cybersecurity, including by generating optimized data sets to train artificial intelligence defense systems and evaluating the performance of varying network architectures at strengthening network security.

#### (c) Authentication of Institute software

The Director shall ensure all software released by the Institute is digitally signed and maintained to enable stakeholders to verify its authenticity and integrity upon installation and execution.

#### (d) Assistance to Inspectors General

Subject to available funding, the Director shall provide technical assistance to improve the education and training of individual Federal agency Inspectors General and staff who are responsible for the annual independent evaluation they are required to perform of the information security program and practices of Federal agencies under section 3555 of title 44.

#### (e) Software supply chain security practices

#### (1) In general

The Director shall, in coordination with industry, academia, and other Federal agencies, as appropriate, develop a set of security outcomes and practices, including security controls, control enhancements, supplemental guidance, or other supporting information to enable software developers and operators to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks over the full lifecycle of software products.

#### (2) Outreach

The Director shall conduct outreach and coordination activities to share technical expertise with Federal agencies, relevant industry stakeholders, and standards development organizations, as appropriate, to encourage the voluntary adoption of the software lifecycle security practices by Federal agencies and industry stakeholders.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, §10224, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1478.)
exv10w10



 




Exhibit
10.10




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

(Jack M. Antonini)




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”) is entered into by and
between Cardtronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jack M. Antonini
(“Employee”) as of March 1, 2004.



     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have heretofore entered into that certain Restricted Stock
Agreement dated as of February 4, 2004 (the “Restricted Stock Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Restricted Stock Agreement in certain
respects;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual agreements set
forth herein, the Company and Employee hereby agree, effective as of the date first set forth
above, that the Restricted Stock Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided:



     1. The last sentence of Section 5(a) of the Restricted Stock Agreement shall be deleted and
the following shall be substituted therefor:




“As soon as administratively feasible after the Company’s receipt of a copy of such
statement, the Company or an Affiliate shall pay a special, one-time bonus to
Employee in the amount of $1,846,417.60 (subject to applicable tax withholding and
other payroll deductions).”



     2. This First Amendment (a) shall supersede any prior agreement between the Company and
Employee relating to the subject matter of this First Amendment and (b) shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any successors to the Company and all persons
lawfully claiming under Employee.



     3. Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment, the terms of the Restricted Stock
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this First Amendment as of
the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“EMPLOYEE”	 	“COMPANY”









CARDTRONICS, INC.

 	 
	     /s/ Jack M. Antonini	 	By:  	             /s/ Fred Lummis
 	 
	JACK M. ANTONINI	 	 	                             Fred Lummis, Chairman 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 




-1-
#### Leo Blum et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 31784.)

Motion for reargument granted. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [See 284 App. Div. 717; upon reargument see *ante,*p. 864.]
### §2283. Protection of nuclear inspectors

#### (a) Homicide

Whoever kills any person who performs any inspections which—

(1) are related to any activity or facility licensed by the Commission, and

(2) are carried out to satisfy requirements under this chapter or under any other Federal law governing the safety of utilization facilities required to be licensed under section 2133 or 2134(b) of this title, or the safety of radioactive materials,

shall be punished as provided under sections 1111 and 1112 of title 18. The preceding sentence shall be applicable only if such person is killed while engaged in the performance of such inspection duties or on account of the performance of such duties.

#### (b) Assault

Whoever forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person who performs inspections as described under subsection (a) of this section, while such person is engaged in such inspection duties or on account of the performance of such duties, shall be punished as provided under section 111 of title 18.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §235, as added Pub. L. 96–295, title II, §202(a), June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 786; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.
No: II-16-011 March 23, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Annual Assessment of Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house on Wednesday,

March 30, to discuss the agency’s assessment of the Turkey Point nuclear power plant during 2015.

The plant, operated by Florida Power & Light Co., is located about 25 miles south of Miami near 

Homestead, Fla.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at 

the Courtyard by Marriott, 2905 NE 9th St., in Homestead.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Turkey Point plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections.

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Turkey Point and 

other nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These 

annual meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to

learn about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing 2015 Turkey Point plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review of the Turkey Point plant for 2015 concluded that it operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will 

continue to continue the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants 

receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and move to white,

yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance indicators 

are updated on the NRC’s website each quarter. 

Current performance information for Turkey Point Unit 3 and Unit 4 is available on the NRC

website.
### §208. Repealed. Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §5(a), 62 Stat. 40

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title II, §207, 58 Stat. 685, related to establishment of special temporary provisions. See sections 206(c) and 207(c) of this title.
#### Clayton M. Jones, Appellant-Respondent, v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown, Respondent-Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 824.]
#### Ella M. Marks v. Bloomingdale Bros., Inc.

Present — Peek, P. J., Grlennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 909.]
#### Jean L. Trenham, as Guardian ad Litem of Walter L. Carey, an infant, Respondent, v. City of Utica, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DWAYNE ORLANDO MAYS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 231 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
#### § 239.200 Form 1-E, notification under Regulation E.

This form shall be used for notification pursuant to Rule 604 (§ 230.604 of this chapter) of Regulation E (§§ 230.601-230.610a of this chapter) by a small business investment company or business development company described in Rule 602 (§ 230.602 of this chapter).

(Secs 3(b) and 3(c), Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c (b) and (c); sec. 38, Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-37))

[49 FR 35347, Sept. 7, 1984]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 1-E, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### In the Matter of Henry N.V., Respondent, v Dawn M.V., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 528]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Romano, J.), entered August 1, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent willfully violated a visitation order.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Kenyon v Kenyon,*266 AD2d 746 [1999]). Present — Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 323]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4443]]

Public Law 115-323
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Real ID Act of 2005 to permit Freely Associated States to 
     meet identification requirements under such Act, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 17, 2018 -  [H.R. 3398]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: REAL ID Act 
Modification for Freely Associated States Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 49 USC 30101 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``REAL ID Act Modification for Freely 
Associated States Act''.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    (a) Definition of State.--Section 201(5) of the Real ID Act of 2005 
(49 U.S.C. 30301 note; Public Law 109-13) is amended by striking ``the 
Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands,''.
    (b) Evidence of Lawful Status.--Section 202(c)(2)(B) of the REAL ID 
Act of 2005 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note; Public Law 109-13) is amended--
            (1) in clause (viii), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ix), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                          ``(x) is a citizen of the Republic of the 
                      Marshall Islands, the Federated States of 
                      Micronesia, or the Republic of Palau who has been 
                      admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant 
                      pursuant to a Compact of Free Association between 
                      the United States and the Republic or Federated 
                      States.''.

    Approved December 17, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3398:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-945 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 26, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 230.478 Powers to amend or withdraw registration statement. All persons signing a registration statement shall be deemed, in the absence of a statement to the contrary, to confer upon the registrant, and upon the agent for service named in the registration statement, the following powers: ( a ) A power to amend the registration statement ( 1 ) by filing an amendment as provided in § 230.473;
( 2 ) by filing any written consent;
( 3 ) by correcting typographical errors;
( 4 ) by reducing the amount of securities registered, pursuant to an undertaking contained in the registration statement.
( b ) A power to make application pursuant to § 230.475 for the Commission's consent to the filing of an amendment.
( c ) A power to withdraw the registration statement or any amendment or exhibit thereto.
( d ) A power to consent to the entry of an order under section 8(b) of the act, waiving notice and hearing, such order being entered without prejudice to the right of the registrant thereafter to have the order vacated upon a showing to the Commission that the registration statement as amended is no longer incomplete or inaccurate on its face in any material respect.
[Reg. C, 12 FR 4076, June 24, 1947, as amended at 16 FR 8737, Aug. 29, 1951]
### §18791. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Priority State

The term "priority State" means a State that—

(A) is eligible for funding under the State Energy Program; and

(B)(i) is among the 15 States with the highest annual per-capita combined residential and commercial sector energy consumption, as most recently reported by the Energy Information Administration; or

(ii) is among the 15 States with the highest annual per-capita energy-related carbon dioxide emissions by State, as most recently reported by the Energy Information Administration.

#### (2) Program

The term "program" means the program established under section 18792(a) of this title.

#### (3) State

The term "State" means a State (as defined in section 6202 of this title), acting through a State energy office.

#### (4) State Energy Program

The term "State Energy Program" means the State Energy Program established under part D of title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6321 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title V, §40501, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1050.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, referred to in par. (4), is Pub. L. 94–163, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 871. Part D of title III of the Act is classified generally to part B (§6321 et seq.) of subchapter III of chapter 77 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6201 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
#### Erwin Ainsworth, Respondent, v. Velton Gydesen, Defendant, and Charles Walker, Appellant.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff against defendant Walker in an automobile negligence action. The orders denied motions for a new trial.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED (Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

HaroldG. Giomi certifies as follows:

1.               I am the Chief Executive Officer of The BankHoldings.

2.               The Form 10-Q/A of The Bank Holdings for theQuarter Ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of The BankHoldings.
| Date:  | January 4, 2007                        |   | /s/ Hal Giomi |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|---------------|--------|
|   | THE BANK HOLDINGS                      |
|   | Harold G. Giomi                        |
|   | Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Legacy Technology Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2013 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Redgie Green, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated:  March __, 2014


/s/Redgie Green
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redgie Green, (Principal Executive & Financial Officer,
Chief Executive Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Bowman Dairy Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 20,803.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Criminal law, § *487*
      ***
      *—when appeal will he dismissed.*On appeal from a judgment in-a criminal case, the appeal may he dismissed on appellee’s motion, where the case is one in which no appeal lies and there having heen.no joinder in error or the equivalent thereof.

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; Hon. John E. Owens, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion filed January 26, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Prosecution by the People of the State of Illinois against' Bowman Dairy Company, a corporation. To reverse a judgment of guilty, defendant appeals.

Montgomery, Hart, Smith *&*Steere, for appellant.

Maclay Hoyne, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Yds, XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 22.8 Situs of Cleared Swaps Customer Accounts. The situs of each of the following shall be located in the United States: ( a ) Each FCM Physical Location or DCO Physical Location;
( b ) Each “account,” within the meaning of § 22.2(f)(1), that a futures commission merchant maintains for each Cleared Swaps Customer; and
( c ) Each Cleared Swaps Customer Account on the books and records of a derivatives clearing organization with respect to the Cleared Swaps Customers of a futures commission merchant.