alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.12g-6 Exemption for securities issued pursuant to section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 or Regulation Crowdfunding. ( a ) For purposes of determining whether an issuer is required to register a security with the Commission pursuant to section 12(g)(1) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78l(g)(1)), the definition of held of record shall not include securities issued pursuant to the offering exemption under section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)) or §§ 227.100 through 227.504 (Regulation Crowdfunding) by an issuer that: ( 1 ) Is current in filing its ongoing annual reports required pursuant to § 227.202 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Has total assets not in excess of $25 million as of the end of its most recently completed fiscal year; and
( 3 ) Has engaged a transfer agent registered pursuant to Section 17A(c) of the Act to perform the function of a transfer agent with respect to such securities.
( b ) An issuer that would be required to register a class of securities under Section 12(g) of the Act as a result of exceeding the asset threshold in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may continue to exclude the relevant securities from the definition of “held of record” for a transition period ending on the penultimate day of the fiscal year two years after the date it became ineligible. The transition period terminates immediately upon the failure of an issuer to timely file any periodic report due pursuant to § 227.202 at which time the issuer must file a registration statement that registers that class of securities under the Act within 120 days.
[80 FR 71750, Nov. 16, 2015, as amended at 86 FR 3601, Jan. 14, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Material Handling Industry (“MHI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Material Handling Industry, Charlotte, NC. The nature and scope of MHI's standards development activities are: ANSI accredited standards                           ( print page 67947)                        developer for various types of material handling equipment.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-25862  Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 230.473 Delaying amendments. ( a ) An amendment in the following form filed with a registration statement, or as an amendment to a registration statement which has not become effective, shall be deemed, for the purpose of section 8(a) of the Act, to be filed on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay the effective date of such registration statement ( 1 ) until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states as provided in paragraph (b) of this section that such registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Act, or
( 2 ) until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to section 8(a), may determine: The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.
( b ) An amendment which for the purpose of paragraph (a)(1) of this section specifically states that a registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Act, shall be in the following form: This registration statement shall hereafter become effective in accordance with the provisions of section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933.
( c ) An amendment pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section which is filed with a registration statement shall be set forth on the facing page thereof. Any such amendment filed after the filing of the registration statement, any amendment altering the proposed date of public sale of the securities being registered, or any amendment filed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section may be made by telegram, letter, or facsimile transmission. Each such telegraphic amendment shall be confirmed in writing within a reasonable time by the filing of a signed copy of the amendment. Such confirmation shall not be deemed an amendment.
( d ) No amendments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section may be filed with a registration statement on Form F-7, F-8 or F-80 (§ 239.37, § 239.38 or § 239.41 of this chapter); on F-10 (§ 239.40 of this chapter) relating to an offering being made contemporaneously in the United States and the issuer's home jurisdiction; on Form S-8 (§ 239.16b of this chapter); on Form S-3 or F-3 (§ 239.13 or § 239.33 of this chapter) relating to a dividend or interest reinvestment plan; on Form S-3 or Form F-3 relating to an automatic shelf registration statement; or on Form S-4 (§ 239.25 of this chapter) complying with General Instruction G of that Form.
[47 FR 11445, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 30054, 30055, July 1, 1991; 61 FR 30402, June 14, 1996; 70 FR 44819, Aug. 3, 2005; 76 FR 46617, Aug. 3, 2011; 86 70200, Dec. 9, 2021]
#### Abe Korn, Appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 20,362.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. Fenimobe Coopeb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 24, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Abe Korn against Chicago Railways Company for damages for personal injuries. • From a judgment for $1,625 against defendant in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

*499Abstract of the Decision.

Damages, § *124*
      ***
      *—amount of verdict for troteen leg and permanent injuries.*Where plaintiff sustained a fracture of the fibula of his left leg and other injuries through a fall from a street car which he was attempting to hoard when it started out with a jerk, and his leg was in a cast for two months and it appeared that he suffered great pain, and medical experts testified as to the accident and permanent character of the injuries, to his leg, *held,*under the evidence, a verdict for $1,625 was not excessive.

Charles L. Mahony and Frank L. Kriete, for appellant; W. W. Gurley and J. R. Guilliams. of counsel.

Brown, Brown & Brown, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20538 Conference Calendar

ALFRONZO BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus S. THOMPSON, Sgt., Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-5386

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alfronzo Brown (#627935) appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), now § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Brown contends that appellee deprived him of his liberty by writing a false disciplinary report in retaliation against him for using the prison’s grievance procedures. We have reviewed the record and Brown’s brief and find no reversible error in the reasoning set forth by the districtNo. 96-20538 - 2 -
court. Brown v. Thompson , No. CA-H-95-5386 (S.D. Tex. May 17, 1996). Brown has failed to produce direct evidence of motivation or allege a chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred. Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1165 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 800 (1996). The discipline imposed upon Brown, i.e. ., loss of status, limited commissary privileges, and the transfer to another facility, did not infringe on a protected liberty interest that would implicate due
process concerns. Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300-01 (1995). Further, we find that Brown’s appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Brown that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Brown is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
P. 1

r ITf r> •>-'--*-~»- l -:---*v*-*vi-* I-?*- ! i'-'-fffi'tTT--"-•"•-""• • . „ „ ._^^^vv---^^^Wt^M**«_ ^

U _ - . : C T- A «.30.198 6 12:5 8 P . 2

U.S

. Deportmen t o f Transportatio n Unite d States Coast Guar d Commandan t Unite

. Slate s Coas t Guar d Washington . OC 2059 3 Sta nSymbol ; Pnone : G-TGC- 2 (202 ) 426-267 5 

### SEP2 | 

### 198

6

. 

# /o/(to) ^?£-S-2o

Unio nCarbid e Corporatio n Attn : D . L . Bruke r P.O . Box5 0 Hahnville , L

A 7005 7
Dea r Sir :
You r lette r o f Septembe r 18 , 198 6 doe s no t constitut e a repor t a s require db

y 4 0 CF R302.6 . The rul e states : Notificatio nrequirements . (a ) An y personi ncharg e o f a vesse l o r a noffshor e o r a n onshor e facilit y

shall , a s soo

na s h e ha s knowledg e o f an y releas e (othe r thana federall y permitte dreleas e o r a n applicatio no f a pesticide ) o f a hazardou s substanc e fro m suc h vesse l o r facilit y i na quantit y

equa l t o or exceeding the reportabl e quantit y "determine

db y thi s par t i nan

y 24-hou r periodimmediatel y notif y

the Nationa l Respons e Cente r [(800 ) 424-8802 ; i nWashingto nD.C . (202 ) 426-2675] . (b ) Release s o f mixture s an dsolution s ar e subjec t t o thes e notificatio nrequirement s onl y wher e componen t hazardou s substanc e o f the mixtur e o r solutio ni s release di na quantit y equa l t o o r greate r tha nit s reportabl e Quantity . The preambl e t o thi s rul e publishe d i nthe Federa l Register , Volum e 50 , Numbe r 6 5 o f Apri l 4 , 198 5 furthe r define dthi s requiremen t a s follows : "Reportin g o f release s pursuan t t o CERCL A sectio n10 3 (a ) and (b ) i s t o b e mad e b y telephon e t o th e Nationa l Respons e Center** . You ma y contac t the Nationa l Respons e Cente r a t 1-800-424-880 2 o r (202 ) 426-267 5 at anytim e t o repor t thi s incident . Fo r amplificatio no f reportin g requirement s fo r continua l release s vo umay

contac t the regiona l leve l o f the Environmenta l Protectio n Agency . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Regio nV I 120 1 Elm

Stree t Dallas , TX7527 0 Telephone : (214 ) 767-260 0P. 2

»8 6 13'0 0 P - 3 FR0. 1 JC ; T.. . T '• "

An y au-stlon s eonoernln g propose dregulation s Rovernin g cjntinou s release s shoul d b e directe d t o : 

### Barbar a Hostag e Mai l Cod e WH-548 B U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y 40 1 M ST. , S.W . Washingto nDC 2046 0 \ Sinc e

K . A . ROC K Commander , U.S . Coas t Guar d Chief . Nationa l Respons e Cente r
Order filed, September 16, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00665

- CV

____________ TERIA LYNN , Appellant

V.

CHARLA PATE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 60th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. B

- 186,884



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 19, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the repor ter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cecilia Gower , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellant s ,

v.

T.H. & C.H., PATERNAL GRANDPARENTS OF J.R., A MINOR CHILD,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15

- 4198

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Marci L. Goodman, Judge.

Dennis W. Moore, Thomasina Moore, and Wendie Michelle Cooper, Sanford, for Appellant Guardian Ad Litem Program; Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant Department of Children and Families.

No appearance for Appellee s

.

PER CURIA M.

W e affirm the dependency court’s order placing J.R. with Appellees for

adoption pursuant to section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2015) , because we find no2 error in the c ourt’s interpretation and application of the statute under the

circumstances of this case. Additionally, for what it’s worth, we note that many of

the policy concerns with the statute articulated by the dependency court at the

hearing below (and echoed by Appellants in their briefs) appear to have been

addressed by recent ly

- approved legislation. See Fla. CS for CS for CS for SB 590,

§ 2 (2016) (Enrolled) (substantially amending § 63.082(6), Fla. Stat.).

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In
connection with the Annual on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of Muzinich BDC,
Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey Youle,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/
    Jeffrey Youle |                   
|--------------------- | ------------------
|Name:                 | Jeffrey
    Youle 
|Date:                 | March
    27, 2020
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 7, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-92-01112-CV

KEENE CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

OLLIS E. KIRK, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90-5245-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Osborne

We reinstate this appeal. In 1994, we abated this case due to bankruptcy. See

TEX.R.APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public 

Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which does not show a 

pending bankruptcy case associated with this appeal.

We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status 

of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would 

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To 

date, neither party has responded.
–2–

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this 

appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for 

publication).

9201112f.p05

/Leslie Osborne//

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KEENE CORPORATION, Appellant

No. 05-92-01112-CV V.

OLLIS E. KIRK, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90-5245-J.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 7th day of June, 2021.
### §§1855aa to 1855ii. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–606, title III, §302(2), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1759

Section 1855aa, Pub. L. 89–769, §2, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1316, defined "major disaster."

Pub. L. 89–769, §§1, 14, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1316, 1321, set out as notes under section 1855aa of this title, gave the name "Disaster Relief Act of 1966" to Pub. L. 89–769, and provided for effective date of such act.

Section 1855bb, Pub. L. 89–769, §3(a), Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1316, called for rescheduling and refinancing of Federal loans in event of a major disaster. See section 3538 of this title and section 912a of Title 7, Agriculture.

Section 1855cc, Pub. L. 89–769, §5, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1317, authorized Secretary of Defense to make available facilities of civil defense communications system in case of imminent natural disasters.

Section 1855dd, Pub. L. 89–769, §8, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1320, set out order of priorities to be followed in processing applications for public facility and public housing assistance in major disaster areas.

Section 1855ee, Pub. L. 89–769, §9, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1320, provided for reimbursement of costs of reconstruction of public facilities, eligible costs, and agencies and parties entitled to reimbursement.

Section 1855ff, Pub. L. 89–769, §10, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1320, directed department heads to administer programs covering major disasters so that there is no duplication of efforts between various programs.

Section 1855gg, Pub. L. 89–769, §11, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1321, provided for extension of time to leaseholders, etc., of public lands in disaster areas.

Section 1855hh, Pub. L. 89–769, §12, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1321, directed the President to coordinate and review all assistance programs.

Section 1855ii, Pub. L. 89–769, §13, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1321, called for a study of air operation facilities for disaster assistance and for a report of findings of such study to Congress with recommendations by May 6, 1967.

For provisions relating to disaster relief, see section 5121 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 31, 1970, see section 304 of Pub. L. 91–606, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 165 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: June 30,2004

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Assurance Company
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago,IL 60685


13F File Number: 28-386

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
August 13,2004
Chicago, Illinois, 60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which Continental Assurance Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA Financial
Corporation on behalf of Continental Assurance Company.
<Page>
PGI 236.211 Special situations.       (b)(2)(A) The contracting officer shall report data on the timelines for definitization of all requests for equitable adjustment (REAs) for change orders received from contractors under construction contracts. The contracting officer shall report this data using the PALT/Protest/REA Tracker module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment at https://piee.eb.mil within 10 business days of definitization. Data to be reported includes—          (*1*) The contract number against which the REA was submitted;          (*2*) The contractor that submitted the REA;          (3) Date of receipt of the REA; and          (4) Date of definitization of the REA and contract modification number.          (B) Individually reported records will be aggregated by the PALT/Protest/REA Tracker module. The PALT/Protest/REA Tracker module will aggregate the timelines for the definitization of REAs for change orders under construction contracts. Contracting officers shall attach the aggregate results for the military department or defense agency to solicitations in accordance with FAR 36.211. See PGI PGI 205.205 Special situations.(h) for further instructions regarding the solicitation notice.    **Parent topic:** PGI 236.2 -SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION