### Request to Use CA **RES Child Restraint System for Larger/Older Persons**

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Br yce Bergeron to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though he exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if m y petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Bryce is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Bryce to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint s ys tem aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relie f is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My son Br yc e is ___ 9__ year’s old, weighs __ 55___ pounds, and is _ 52

_____ inches tall. My
**son** ’ s physical condition is as follows : he has autism accompanied with behavioral challenges and mil d CP. As a result of his physical condition, **Bryce** needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of his weight is incapable of
com pliance with the regulation. **I am**  **also submitting**  **the following**  **contact informatio**  **n: parent** 

**s: Shelly**  **and Brian**  **Bergeron, 64**  **Wallis St.**  **Douglas, MA**  **01516, can**  **be reached**  **at brianshelly@charter.net**  **or 508** **- 335** **- 1057.**  I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Bryc e Bergeron be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES,
ma nufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for B ryce and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Bryce ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight. Enhancin g safety for Bryce is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows him to use commercial air transportation. W ithout the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, he would be unable to fly commercially. I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulatio n. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the
com ponents of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by so me one who weighed several hundred pounds.I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the

child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might c ause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would
me an that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated beh ind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Bryce only sits in a passenger seat wit h no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Bryce while he is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Br yc e’s parent s or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Br yc e’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption. I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Register. W e want to travel September 2, 2015 for a doctor’s appointment on September 3 rd . If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following: This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the C RS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. W e request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though ( **she/he** ) exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for ( **her/him** ) during the fl ight. Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Shelly and Brian Bergeron