alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15972. Loan to place Alaska clean coal technology facility in service

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Borrower

The term "borrower" means the owner of the clean coal technology plant.

#### (2) Clean coal technology plant

The term "clean coal technology plant" means the plant located near Healy, Alaska, constructed under Department cooperative agreement number DE–FC–22–91PC90544.

#### (3) Cost of a direct loan

The term "cost of a direct loan" has the meaning given the term in section 661a(5)(B) of title 2.

#### (b) Authorization

Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary shall use amounts made available under subsection (e) to provide the cost of a direct loan to the borrower for purposes of placing the clean coal technology plant into reliable operation for the generation of electricity.

#### (c) Requirements

#### (1) Maximum loan amount

The amount of the direct loan provided under subsection (b) shall not exceed $80,000,000.

#### (2) Determinations by Secretary

Before providing the direct loan to the borrower under subsection (b), the Secretary shall determine that—

(A) the plan of the borrower for placing the clean coal technology plant in reliable operation has a reasonable prospect of success;

(B) the amount of the loan (when combined with amounts available to the borrower from other sources) will be sufficient to carry out the project; and

(C) there is a reasonable prospect that the borrower will repay the principal and interest on the loan.

#### (3) Interest; term

The direct loan provided under subsection (b) shall bear interest at a rate and for a term that the Secretary determines appropriate, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into account the needs and capacities of the borrower and the prevailing rate of interest for similar loans made by public and private lenders.

#### (4) Additional terms and conditions

The Secretary may require any other terms and conditions that the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

#### (d) Use of payments

The Secretary shall retain any payments of principal and interest on the direct loan provided under subsection (b) to support energy research and development activities, to remain available until expended, subject to any other conditions in an applicable appropriations Act.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to provide the cost of a direct loan under subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §412, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 754.)
**Exhibit 10.24****AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING NOTE**THIS AMENDMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of this 30th day of March, 2007 by and betweenACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP., a Colorado corporation, having an office at 700 SeventeenthStreet, Suite 1200, Denver, Colorado 80202 (“Maker”) and GDBA INVESTMENTS, LLLP, a Colorado limitedliability limited partnership, having an office at 1440 Blake Street, Denver, Colorado 80202(“Holder”).WITNESSETH:WHEREAS, Maker has executed and delivered to Holder a Revolving Note dated September 28, 2006(the “Note”) to evidence Maker’s indebtedness to Holder in the principal amount of Three MillionFive Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00); andWHEREAS, Maker and Holder wish to further subordinate the Note to a credit facility to beextended to Maker by United Western Bank and otherwise modify certain terms and provisions of theNote;NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth herein above, and for other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, intendingto be legally bound, the parties hereto do hereby mutually and expressly understand and agree asfollows:1. Definitions. The definition of the term “Senior Debt” appearing in Section 5,entitled “Definitions,” of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:“Senior Debt” means all indebtedness, obligations and otherliabilities of the Company to (i) Vectra Bank Colorado, nationalassociation, pursuant to that certain First Amendment to CreditAgreement dated August 3, 2006, as amended, (ii) United WesternBank (“UWB”) pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement dated March30, 2007 between UWB and Maker, as the same may be amended,modified, restated or extended from time to time, and any otherindebtness in replacement or subordination to Vectra Bank or UnitedWestern Bank as may be approved by Holder in writing from time totime.2. Subordination. The words “principal and” appearing in line ten of Section 2,entitled “Subordination,” of the Note are hereby deleted.3. Representations and Warranties. Maker hereby represents and warrants, and Holderhereby acknowledges and agrees, that (a) no default has occurred under the Note, (b) except asprovided herein, the Note has not been modified or amended, and (c) the execution and delivery ofthis Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of the parties hereto.
 
 

 
4. Ratification. Except as modified by this Agreement, all of the terms of the Noteare ratified and reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect.5. Inurement. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon andshall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.6. Governing Law. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by theapplicable laws of the State of Colorado.[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have each caused this Agreement to be executed by theirrespective duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written.           MAKER:           ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.,
INITIAL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15- 01 41 

Focus Ready Draft 1 /29/2015 

Post f ocus acti vitie s for bring 
Consumer Us e : Yes 

SAT (concerns) (12/23/ 2014) : 

Re l ated 

Ana l ogs: 

Migrat b l e 

PBT rating : P1B1T1 

Heal t h : 2 Inha l a tion 

Eco : 2 Wa t er (Al l rel eases to water wi t h a CC 

(Testing desired) 

390 ppb) , XB Testing 
OCCUPAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RATI NG : 2D 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPT I ONS : 
INI TI AL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15 - 0141 

INI TI AL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15 - 0141 


INI TI AL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15 - 0141
### §2003. Regulations

The Secretary of Health and Human Services is also authorized to make such other regulations as he deems desirable to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Aug. 5, 1954, ch. 658, §3, 68 Stat. 674; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 6 of act Aug. 5, 1954, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3908 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility 

of designating the Ka’u Coast on the island of Hawaii as a unit of 

the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2012 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability 

and feasibility of designating the Ka’u Coast on the 

island of Hawaii as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KA’U COAST STUDY; REPORT. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Ka’u Coast Preservation Act’’. 

6 (b) STUDY.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte8 rior shall complete a study to determine the suit9 ability and feasibility of designating the Ka’u Coast 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3908 IH

1 on the island of Hawaii, as a unit of the National 

2 Park System. 

3 (2) STUDY AREA.—The study area shall extend 

4 generally from Kapaoo Point to Kahuku Point, Ha5 waii. 

6 (3) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAW.—Para7 graphs (2) and (3) of section 8(c) of Public Law 91– 

8 383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)(2) and (3); commonly 

9 known as the National Park System General Au10 thorities Act) shall apply to the study. 

11 (c) REPORT.—Upon completion of the study required 

12 by subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior shall trans13 mit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House 

14 of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and 

15 Natural Resources of the Senate a report containing the 

16 conclusions of the study. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 15-079 November 19, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Renews Operating Licenses of Byron Nuclear Power Plant in Illinois

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of Units 1 and 2 of the 

Byron nuclear power plant in Byron, Ill., for an additional 20 years. 

Byron Station, located about 17 miles southwest of Rockford, has two pressurized-water 

reactors. The renewed licenses authorize Unit 1 to operate through Oct. 31, 2044, and Unit 2 through 

Nov. 6, 2046. Exelon Generation Co. applied to renew the licenses on May 29, 2013. The NRC staff’s 

review of the application proceeded on two tracks. A safety evaluation report with open items was 

issued Oct. 30, 2014, and a final report issued July 6, 2015. A supplemental environmental impact 

statement was issued July 15, 2015. These documents, as well as other information about the Byron 

license renewal, are available on the NRC website. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor 

Safeguards also reviewed the staff’s work. 

Renewal of Byron’s operating licenses brings to 80 the number of commercial nuclear power 

reactors with renewed licenses. Applications for an additional 14 renewals are currently under review. 

Information about these reviews can be found on the NRC website.
### §13526. Uncosted obligations

#### (a) Report

Along with the submission of each of the President's annual budget requests to Congress, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report which—

(1) identifies the amount of Department of Energy funds that were, as of the end of the previous fiscal year—

(A) committed uncosted obligations; and

(B) uncommitted uncosted obligations;

(2) specifically describes the purposes for which all such funds are intended; and

(3) explains the effect that information contained in the report has had on the annual budget request for the Department of Energy being simultaneously submitted.

#### (b) Definitions

Within 90 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall submit a report to the Congress containing definitions of the terms "uncosted obligation", "committed uncosted obligation", and "uncommitted uncosted obligation" for purposes of reports to be submitted under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXIII, §2307, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3096.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.14a-1 Application of §§ 260.7a-15 to 260.7a-38.

Sections 260.7a-15 to 260.7a-38 shall be applicable to annual reports under section 314(a).
#### Mofaz Baksh, Respondent, v Herzel Shabi, Defendant, and Ester Bueno, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 327]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Ester Bueno appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated September 13, 2005, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Ester Bueno, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, the defendant Ester Bueno, via her submissions in support of her motion, established, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs treating physician impermissibly relied on the unsworn reports of other doctors in reaching his conclusions *(see Springer v Arthurs,*22 AD3d 829 [2005]; *Vallejo v Builders for Family Youth, Diocese of Brooklyn, Inc.,*18 AD3d 741 [2005]; *Mahoney v Zerillo,*6 AD3d 403 [2004]; *Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental,*216 AD2d 266 [1995]). Moreover, the plaintiffs treating physician failed to address either the findings of Bueno’s examining radiologist, who determined that the plaintiff suffered from degenerative processes at the L-5 level of her lumbar spine, or the fact that the plaintiff was involved in a subsequent rear-end collision. This rendered speculative his conclusion that the plaintiffs injuries and limitations were causally related to the subject accident *(see Tudisco v James,*28 *526AD3d 536 [2006]; *Giraldo v Mandanici,*24 AD3d 419 [2005]; *Allyn v Hanley, 2*AD3d 470 [2003]; *Lorthe v Adeyeye,*306 AD2d 252 [2003]). Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to proffer competent medical evidence that connected his alleged inability to perform substantially all of his daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days subsequent to the subject accident with the alleged accident-related injuries *(see Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569 [2000]; *DiNunzio v County of Suffolk,*256 AD2d 498 [1998]). Adams, J.P, Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §14181. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14181 was editorially reclassified as section 12621 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.36a1-1 Exemption from Section 7 for OTC derivatives dealers. Preliminary Note:
OTC derivatives dealers are a special class of broker-dealers that are exempt from certain broker-dealer requirements, including membership in a self-regulatory organization (§ 240.15b9-2), regular broker-dealer margin rules (§ 240.36a1-1), and application of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (§ 240.36a1-2). OTC derivative dealers are subject to special requirements, including limitations on the scope of their securities activities (§ 240.15a-1), specified internal risk management control systems (§ 240.15c3-4), recordkeeping obligations (§ 240.17a-3(a)(10)), and reporting responsibilities (§ 240.17a-12). They are also subject to alternative net capital treatment (§ 240.15c3-1(a)(5)).
( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, transactions involving the extension of credit by an OTC derivatives dealer shall be exempt from the provisions of section 7(c) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78g(c)), provided that the OTC derivatives dealer complies with Section 7(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78g(d)).
( b ) The exemption provided under paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to extensions of credit made directly by a registered broker or dealer (other than an OTC derivatives dealer) in connection with transactions in eligible OTC derivative instruments for which an OTC derivatives dealer acts as counterparty.
[63 FR 59404, Nov. 3, 1998]
§ 12.305 Disqualification of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) *At their own request.* An Administrative Law Judge may withdraw from a formal decisional proceeding when they consider themselves to be disqualified on the grounds of personal bias, conflict of interest, or similar bases. In such event, they shall immediately notify the Commission and each of the parties of the withdrawal and of the basis for such action.
( b ) *Upon the request of a party.* Any party may request an Administrative Law Judge to disqualify themselves on the grounds of personal bias, conflict of interest, or similar bases. Interlocutory review of an order denying such a request may be sought without certification of the matter by an Administrative Law Judge, only in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 12.309.
[86 FR 64359, Nov. 18, 2021]
§ 20.8 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Enforcement, or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate, the authority in § 20.6(d) for issuing a special call.
( b ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Data, in consultation with the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate, the authority in § 20.10 for determining the described compliance schedules.
( c ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Data, in consultation with the Director of the Division of Market Oversight, or such other employee or employees as the Directors each may designate, the authority: ( 1 ) In § 20.5(a)(3) for issuing a special call for a 102S filing; and
( 2 ) In § 20.5(b) for issuing a special call for a 40S filing.
( d ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Data, or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate, the authority, in § 20.7, for providing instructions or determining the format, coding structure, and electronic data transmission procedures for submitting data records and any other information required under this part.
( e ) The Directors of the Division of Enforcement, Division of Market Oversight, and the Division of Data may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter which has been delegated in this section.
( f ) Nothing in this section prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
[82 FR 28769, June 26, 2017, as amended at 89 FR 71810, Sept. 4, 2024]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Craig A. Wheeler, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: September 1,   2016 | /s/ Craig A. Wheeler                    |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                           | Craig A. Wheeler                        |
|                           | President and Chief   Executive Officer |

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.19c-1 Governing certain off-board agency transactions by members of national securities exchanges.

The rules of each national securities exchange shall provide as follows:

No rule, stated policy, or practice of this exchange shall prohibit or condition, or be construed to prohibit or condition or otherwise limit, directly or indirectly, the ability of any member acting as agent to effect any transaction otherwise than on this exchange with another person (except when such member also is acting as agent for such other person in such transaction), in any equity security listed on this exchange or to which unlisted trading privileges on this exchange have been extended.

(Secs. 2, 3, 6, 11, 17, 19, 23, Pub. L. 78-291, 48 Stat. 881, 882, 885, 891, 897, 898, 901, as amended by secs. 2, 3, 6, 14, 16, 18, Pub. L. 94-29, 89 Stat. 97, 104, 110, 137, 146, 155 (15 U.S.C. 78b, 78c, 78f, 78k, 78q, 78s, 78w, as amended by Pub. L. 94-29 (June 4, 1975)); sec. 7 Pub. L. 94-29, 89 Stat. 111 (15 U.S.C. 78k-1))

[43 FR 1328, Jan. 9, 1978]
### §2154. International atomic pool

The President is authorized to enter into an international arrangement with a group of nations providing for international cooperation in the nonmilitary applications of atomic energy and he may thereafter cooperate with that group of nations pursuant to sections 2074(a), 2077, 2094, 2112, 2133, 2134, or 2164(a) of this title: Provided, however, That the cooperation is undertaken pursuant to an agreement for cooperation entered into in accordance with section 2153 of this title.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §124, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 940; amended Pub. L. 93–377, §5, Aug. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 475; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–377 substituted reference to section 2074(a) of this title for reference to section 2074 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
#### Carol D. Roberts et al., as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Bradley F. Golden, Deceased, Appellants, v County *1188of Oneida, Defendant, and Town of Westmoreland et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[820 NYS2d 916]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, A.J.), entered January 21, 2005 in a personal injury and wrongful death action. The order, among other things, granted the motions of defendants Town of Westmoreland and Jeffrey J. Schaller for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Croman v County of Oneida*(32 AD3d 1186 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche and Green, JJ.
### §2000aa–5. Border and customs searches

This chapter shall not impair or affect the ability of a government officer or employee, pursuant to otherwise applicable law, to conduct searches and seizures at the borders of, or at international points of, entry into the United States in order to enforce the customs laws of the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–440, title I, §105, Oct. 13, 1980, 94 Stat. 1880.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1981, except that insofar as such provisions are applicable to a State or any governmental unit other than the United States, the section is effective one year from Oct. 13, 1980, see section 108 of Pub. L. 96–440, set out as a note under section 2000aa of this title.