alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 995.21 Registry of data users. ( a ) CED or CEVAD shall maintain a registry of customers receiving NOAA ENC data. CED or CEVAD shall provide said registry to NOAA on a biannual basis for internal NOAA planning and product evaluation use. NOAA agrees to treat such information as proprietary (if requested to do so by the CED or CEVAD).
( b ) ( 1 ) The registry shall include, but not be limited to: ( i ) Which NOAA ENC ® cells were provided to each customer;
( ii ) Edition number of each cell provided;
( iii ) Updates provided for each cell;
( iv ) Method of distribution for each customer.
( 2 ) The registry may also include information about the type and size of vessel that the NOAA ENC data has been provided for as well as an anonymous unique identifier for the vessel.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.14d-2 Commencement of a tender offer. ( a ) *Date of commencement.* A bidder will have commenced its tender offer for purposes of section 14(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78n) and the rules under that section at 12:01 a.m. on the date when the bidder has first published, sent or given the means to tender to security holders. For purposes of this section, the means to tender includes the transmittal form or a statement regarding how the transmittal form may be obtained.
( b ) *Pre-commencement communications.* A communication by the bidder will not be deemed to constitute commencement of a tender offer if: ( 1 ) It does not include the means for security holders to tender their shares into the offer; and
( 2 ) All written communications relating to the tender offer, from and including the first public announcement, are filed under cover of Schedule TO (§ 240.14d-100) with the Commission no later than the date of the communication. The bidder also must deliver to the subject company and any other bidder for the same class of securities the first communication relating to the transaction that is filed, or required to be filed, with the Commission. Instructions to paragraph ( b
)(2):
1. The box on the front of Schedule TO indicating that the filing contains pre-commencement communications must be checked. 2. Any communications made in connection with an exchange offer registered under the Securities Act of 1933 need only be filed under § 230.425 of this chapter and will be deemed filed under this section. 3. Each pre-commencement written communication must include a prominent legend in clear, plain language advising security holders to read the tender offer statement when it is available because it contains important information. The legend also must advise investors that they can get the tender offer statement and other filed documents for free at the Commission's web site and explain which documents are free from the offeror. 4. See §§ 230.135, 230.165 and 230.166 of this chapter for pre-commencement communications made in connection with registered exchange offers. 5. “Public announcement” is any oral or written communication by the bidder, or any person authorized to act on the bidder's behalf, that is reasonably designed to, or has the effect of, informing the public or security holders in general about the tender offer.
( c ) *Filing and other obligations triggered by commencement.* As soon as practicable on the date of commencement, a bidder must comply with the filing requirements of § 240.14d-3(a), the dissemination requirements of § 240.14d-4(a) or (b), and the disclosure requirements of § 240.14d-6(a).
[64 FR 61459, Nov. 10, 1999]
EGU MACT - RIA - Interagency comments on Chapter 6 

 12/14/2011 11:02 AM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Attached are interagency comments on Chapter 6 of the RIA. I’ll be 

sending the suggested edits for each Chapter as I pull them together, so 

you can start to address them. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563.docx
§ 201.231 Enforcement and disciplinary proceedings: Production of witness statements. ( a ) *Availability.* Any respondent in an enforcement or disciplinary proceeding may move that the Division of Enforcement produce for inspection and copying any statement of any person called or to be called as a witness by the Division of Enforcement that pertains, or is expected to pertain, to his or her direct testimony and that would be required to be produced pursuant to the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. 3500. For purposes of this section, *statement* shall have the meaning set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3500(e). Such production shall be made at a time and place fixed by the hearing officer and shall be made available to any party, provided, however, that the production shall be made under conditions intended to preserve the items to be inspected or copied.
( b ) *Failure to produce—harmless error.* In the event that a statement required to be made available for inspection and copying by a respondent is not turned over by the Division of Enforcement, no rehearing or redecision of a proceeding already heard or decided shall be required unless the respondent establishes that the failure to turn over the statement was not harmless error.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13177, Mar. 19, 2004]
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”),on Form 10-Q as amended by this Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Ted S. Smith, Chief Accounting Officer, certify, to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  October 20, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ TED S.  SMITH         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |  Ted S.  Smith             |
|                         |   |  Chief  Accounting Officer |

 

----
### §1973j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973j was editorially reclassified as section 10308 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|                                                                             |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ CHASE CAREY Chase Carey President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2009 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Tierney,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael J. Tierney                  August 14, 2007
-----------------------
Michael J. Tierney                           Date
Chief Executive Officer
Order entered November 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00365 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 01302 - CR MARK ANGELO GUAJARDO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F13 - 72357 - U , F14 - 71086 - U



### O RDER These two appeals involve cases that were tried together. 1 However, although the notices of appeal were filed on the same date, they were delivered to th is Court seven months apart. Th e clerk’s and reporter’s records have now been filed in both cases. Appellant has filed a brief in cause no. 05

- 15

- 00365

- CR, but has not yet filed a brief in cause no. 05

- 15

- 01302

- CR. The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN D AYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the February 4, 2015 judicial confession for trial court no. F13

- 72357

- U (05

- 15

- 00365

- CR)
.

1 T he reporter’s record reflects that three other cases were tried with these two. The Court has no record of notices of appeal having been filed regarding the three other cases.After all briefs have been filed for the two cases, the appeals will be set for submission as

companion cases. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
   In
connection with the Yearly Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Karim Menassa, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/
Karim Menassa
 Karim
Menassa
 President
and Principal Executive Officer
  December
10, 2008
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4063 

To repeal section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and 

Disclosure Act of 2009 which relates to carrying certain weapons in 

National Parks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2012 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. FARR, Ms. LEE of California, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New 

York, Mr. PASCRELL, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability 

Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 which relates 

to carrying certain weapons in National Parks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guns-Free National 

5 Parks Act of 2012’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4063 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION THAT RELATES TO CAR2 RYING CERTAIN WEAPONS IN NATIONAL 

3 PARKS. 

4 Section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability Re5 sponsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 1a– 

6 7b) is repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Seymour Mann, Inc., v. United Factors Corporation.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 359.]
§ 270.30b1-9(T) Temporary rule regarding monthly report. ( a ) Until April 1, 2019, each registered management investment company subject to § 270.30b1-9 of this chapter must satisfy its reporting obligation under that section by maintaining in its records the information that is required to be included in Form N-PORT (§ 274.150 of this chapter).
( b ) The information maintained in the registered management investment company's records under paragraph (a) of this section shall be treated as a record under section 31(a)(1) of the Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-30(a)(1)] and § 270.31a-1(b) of this chapter subject to the requirements of § 270.31a-2(a)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) This section will expire and no longer be effective on March 31, 2026.
[82 FR 58739, Dec. 14, 2017] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 82 FR 58739, Dec. 14, 2017, § 270.30b1-9(T) was added, effective Jan. 16, 2018, to Mar. 31, 2026.
Suzy Heard, CSR Travis County Court at Law No. 6 509 W. 11th Street Austin, TX 78701

December 18 , 2015 Third Court of Appeals Attention: Clerk of Court

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03

- 15

- 00530

- CR Trial Court Case Number: C

- 1

- CR

- 14

- 160011 J ack Bissett vs. State of Texas

Dear Clerk: With regard to the above

- referenced case, I would like to update the Court on the status of the Reporter’s Record

. Mr. Bissett, through his appellate attorney Mr. David Schulman, made arrangements with me to pay half of the cost of the Reporter’s Record up front and the remaining balance before I would submit the record to the Third Court o f Appeals. I received a payment of half of the cost on October 5, 2015 and began working on the record. Yesterday (12/17/2015), Mr. Schulman
gave me $500 towards the balance due. There is still an amount due of $683.75.

The record is now complete. I am prepared to submit this record upon payment of $683.75

. However, I am leaving town for the holidays tomorrow morning and will not be back until January 4, 2016. If Mr. Bissett happens to send his payment for the b alance due , I will not know about it until I return . If the payment is in my office when I return to work on January 4, I will submit the record on that day. If not, I will update the Court again at that time. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Suzy Heard, CSR
#### In the Matter of Birds Eye Foods, Inc., Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Barker, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 544]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), dated June 16, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.480 Form CB, tender offer statement in connection with a tender offer for a foreign private issuer.

This form is used to report an issuer tender offer conducted in compliance with § 240.13e-4(h)(8) of this chapter and a third-party tender offer conducted in compliance with § 240.14d-1(c) of this chapter. This report also is used by a subject company pursuant to § 240.14e-2(d) of this chapter.

[64 FR 61406, Nov. 10, 1999]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form CB, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
# I

R eco rd of D iscussion Docket N o . F AA- Directorate Identi fi e r : -A D
With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e. , Design Approval Holder , manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA , AOPA, ALPA , GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PER SO N CONTA CTE D DATE TOPI CS DISCU SSED 

### Th e Boei n g Proj ect Administrato r Jul y- A u g ust 2014 Other. Li s t below. 

### Comp any and author ized



### ~vvT 

### u. 

## 'Rclle-lr"' repre se ntatives

O th e r/ Addit i ona l Informati o n:
### §17821. Repealed or Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1102, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4808, which related to initiation of discussions on development of framework for space traffic management, was repealed in part and transferred in part. Subsec. (b) was repealed and reenacted as section 71302 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314, §§3, 6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3328, 3444, which Act enacted Title 51. Subsec. (a), which provided congressional finding of need for space traffic management, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 71302 of Title 51.
### SUBCHAPTER III—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
### §18386. Collaboration with ESMD and SOMD on robotic missions

The Administrator shall ensure that the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate and the Space Operations Mission Directorate coordinate with the Science Mission Directorate on an overall approach and plan for interagency and international collaboration on robotic missions that are NASA or internationally developed, including lunar, Lagrangian, near-Earth orbit, and Mars spacecraft, such as the International Lunar Network. Within 90 days after October 11, 2010, the Administrator shall provide a plan to the appropriate committees of Congress for implementation of the collaborative approach required by this section. The Administrator may not cancel or initiate any Exploration Systems Mission Directorate or Science Mission Directorate robotic project before the plan is submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title VIII, §807, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2834.)
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
Subpart 543.1 - General 	  **Parent topic:** Part 543 - Contract Modifications543.102 Policy. 		    (a) In accordance with the Federal Information and Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA) (Pub L. No. 113-291), the contracting officer must ensure any modification that makes substantial changes to the scope of a contract or order for GSA information technology that is inconsistent with the approved acquisition plan receives approval from the GSA Chief Information Officer (CIO). See section 511.170 for any necessary GSA IT Standards Profile approvals. For interagency acquisitions, the requesting agency is responsible for CIO coordination and approval for any modifications that make substantial changes to the scope of a contract or order.543.170 Changes in designated subcontractors, inspection and/or production points. 		    (a) Before executing a contract modification authorizing changes in either a designated subcontractor or inspection or production point, the contracting officer must consider the impact of the change on the contractor’s ability to satisfy contract requirements. Employ the same standards that were used to determine that the contractor was responsible (see FAR 9.1 and GSAM 509.1). 				         				         					          (b)  The modification must identify the nature of the change and the effective date. In establishing an effective date, consider the time necessary for affected offices to take required actions.543.171 Changes in commercial supplier agreements. 		    (a)  Commercial supplier agreements must be modified if the updated terms are material as defined in 552.212-4(w)(1)(iv) or 552.232-78(a)(6). 				         				         					          (b)  When authorizing a contract modification to update commercial supplier agreement terms, the contracting officer must consider the impact to the Government's rights and negotiate the terms if necessary. 				         				         					          (c)  The contracting officer is responsible for maintaining a current copy of the commercial supplier agreement in the contract file.