alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 553.1 - General 	  **Parent topic:** Part 553 - Forms553.101 Requirements for use of forms. 		    Parts 501–552 and 570 prescribe the requirements for use of GSA forms illustrated or referenced in this part. You may identify the prescription as follows: 			       				         					          (a)                   *Forms available on-line*. The list of forms available on-line in 553.370-1 identifies the basic prescription for each referenced form. 				         				         					          (b)                   *Illustrated forms*. The prescription for each illustrated form is identified by a cross-reference shown on the illustration. When a form is mentioned in more than one place in this regulation, the section referenced on the illustration is the section that contains the basic prescription.553.102 Current editions. 		    You must use the current edition of the forms identified in subpart  553.3 unless otherwise authorized under this regulation.553.170 Establishing and revising GSA Forms. 		    (a) GSA Order OGP 1824.1, GSA Forms Management Program Handbook, outlines requirements, responsibilities, standards, policies, and procedures for the GSA Forms Management Program, including the instruction that. 					           						             							               								                 									                  (i)  If two or more GSA Services or Offices use an acquisition related GSA form, the Office of Acquisition Policy maintains the form. 								                 								                 									                  (ii)  If only one GSA Service or Office uses a GSA form or if the form is used for a contract type unique to one Service or Office (e.g.,construction contracts), that Service or Office is responsible for maintaining the form. 								                 							               						             					           				         				         					          (b) To establish a new GSA Form, request changes to an existing form, or cancel an existing form, please reference the FAQs found at the GSA Forms library at https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms. 					           						             							               								                 									                  (i)  Any proposed new or revised GSA acquisition related form must be submitted to the Office of Acquisition Policy for review and concurrence.
#### Charles K. Engle, Respondent, v. Simplex Automobile Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
### §18775. Plan for the modeling and forecasting of demand for minerals used in the energy sector

#### (a) Plan

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after November 15, 2021, the Administrator, in coordination with the Director of the United States Geological Survey, shall develop a plan for the modeling and forecasting of demand for energy technologies, including for energy production, transmission, or storage purposes, that use minerals that are or could be designated as critical minerals.

#### (2) Inclusions

The plan developed under paragraph (1) shall identify—

(A) the type and quantity of minerals consumed, delineated by energy technology;

(B) existing markets for manufactured energy-producing, energy-transmission, and energy-storing equipment; and

(C) emerging or potential markets for new energy-producing, energy-transmission, and energy-storing technologies entering commercialization.

#### (b) Metrics

The plan developed under subsection (a)(1) shall produce forecasts of energy technology demand—

(1) over the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods beginning on the date on which development of the plan is completed;

(2) by economic sector; and

(3) according to any other parameters that the Administrator, in collaboration with the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Geological Survey, determines are needed for the Annual Critical Minerals Outlook.

#### (c) Collaboration

The Administrator shall develop the plan under subsection (a)(1) in consultation with—

(1) the Secretary with respect to the possible trajectories of emerging energy-producing and energy-storing technologies; and

(2) the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Geological Survey—

(A) to ensure coordination;

(B) to avoid duplicative effort; and

(C) to align the analysis of demand with data and analysis of where the minerals are produced, refined, and subsequently processed into materials and parts that are used to build energy technologies.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title IV, §40415, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1044.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT AB EL AR C IGA-LORENZANO; B R IAN AR C IGA-ZAR

A TE, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-70922 Age n c y Nos. A075-476-280

A075-476-282 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Abe l Arc iga -Lore nz ano a nd B rian Arc i ga -Zarat e , nat ive s and c itiz e ns of M e x ic o, pe tition for re vie wof a n orde r of the B oa

rd of Im m i gration Appe a ls (“ B IA” ) de ny ing the ir m otion to re ope n de porta tion proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of



# FIL ED MAY28 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

m otion to re ope n. A v agy an v . Holde r , 646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th C ir. 2011). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w . As the gove rnm e nt c onc e de s, Arc iga -Lore nz ano’ s de pa rture from

the Unite d Stat e s did not de

prive the B IA of jurisdic tion to c onside r his m otion to re ope n. Se e Re y e s-Torre s v . Holde r , 645 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th C ir. 2011). The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion by

de ny ing a s untim e ly

pe titione rs’ m otion to re o pe n b a se d on ine ffe c tive a s sista nc e of c ounse l be c a

u se pe titione rs file d the ir m o tion e i ght y e ars a fte r the ir orde r of de porta tion be c a m e a dm inistra

tive ly fina l, se e8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(7)(C )(i); 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and fa ile d to de m onstra

te the due dilige n c e ne c e ssa ry to wa rrant e quita

ble tolling of the filing de a dline , se e A v agy an , 646 F.3d a t 680-81 (finding no due

dilige nc e by a pe titione r who “ ha d re a son to suspe c t” tha t he r form e r attorne y s ha d not a de quate ly

pre p a re d he r c a se but who ne v e rthe le ss “ took no a ffirm at ive ste ps to inve stiga te ” the ir e rrors a fte r the B IA ha d de nie d he r a ppe a l). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 0 9 2 2 2
#### In the Matter of Lewis Rossman, Petitioner, v Roger Starr et al., Respondents.

— Petition dismissed and determination of the Administrator of the Housing and Development Administration of the City of New York unanimously confirmed in part with leave to petitioner to apply at Special Term to serve amended petition, without costs and without disbursements. In this article 78 proceeding transferred to this court by Special Term (CPLR 7803, subd 4; 7804, subd [g]) whereby petitioner alleges that the determination of the administrator suspending petitioner without pay for a period of two months from the date of suspension and demoting petitioner from the position of Senior Plumbing Inspector to Plumbing Inspector is not supported by substantial evidence, we find the brief of petitioner does not address the issue raised by the petition. We do find, however, on our review of the record that the determination of the administrator is supported by substantial evidence. We find that petitioner’s brief is addressed solely to the claims that petitioner’s suspension for the period of two months was unlawful and that there was inordinate delay in proceeding with departmental charges after petitioner was arrested on charges which led to his indictment, trial, and acquittal. We note that the corporation counsel agrees that if petitioner was unlawfully suspended without pay for a period of *757more than 30 days, and did not waive such delay, and if that issue were properly before us, petitioner would be entitled to his back pay for the period of such delay. However, the petition does not assert such claim. In these circumstances, we agree with the corporation counsel that the appropriate disposition here is to dismiss the petition, and confirm the administrator’s determination as set forth hereinabove, and remand this matter to Special Term where petitioner could apply for leave to serve an amended petition, and respondents could, if so advised, either resist such application based on lateness and possible prejudice caused thereby, or at the very least put in an answer to the amended petition, if leave to serve an amended petition is granted. As to the claim of excessiveness of penalty raised in petitioner’s brief, there is no need to decide that issue now—since its resolution is necessarily related to the question whether petitioner’s suspension prior to the disciplinary hearing was unduly or unnecessarily protracted. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman and Markewich, JJ.
#### § 38.258 Additional sources for compliance.

Applicants and designated contract markets may refer to the guidance and acceptable practices in appendix B of this part to demonstrate to the Commission compliance with the requirements of § 38.250 of this part.
steam

_ record - Re: ICR Extension Request

Gree tings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

- From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. gov> To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <a nn.wearmouth@mirant.com> Date: 7/13/2010 6:07 AM Sub j ect: Re: ICR Extension Request Attach ments: ICR Extension Request.PDF Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0293DO

...
### §1552. Powers of certain agencies designated to provide temporary shelter

Any agency designated by the President to provide temporary shelter under the provisions of Public Law Numbered 9, Seventy-seventh Congress, Public Law Numbered 73, Seventy-seventh Congress, or the Third Supplemental National Defense Appropriations Act, 1942, shall have the same powers with respect to the management, maintenance, operation, and administration of such temporary shelter as are granted to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under section 1544 and section 1546 of this title with respect to projects constructed hereunder, and the provisions of section 1547 of this title shall apply to such temporary shelter projects and the occupants thereof.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title III, §312, as added Jan. 21, 1942, ch. 14, §10, 56 Stat. 13; amended Ex. Ord. No. 9070, §1, eff. Feb. 24, 1942, 7 F.R. 1529; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73; Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The provisions of Public Laws 9 and 73, referred to in text, are not classified to the Code. The Third Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1942, referred to in text, is Public Law 353, the relevant provisions of which are not classified to the Code. For further details, see note set out under section 1524 of this title.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Housing and Home Finance Administrator" for "National Housing Administrator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Works Administrator relating to defense housing consolidated with other agencies into National Housing Agency during World War II by Ex. Ord. No. 9070.
3409.507-2 Contract clause.       The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.209–71 (Conflict of interest) in all contracts for services above the simplified acquisition threshold.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3409.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Amended Form 8-A replaces former Form 8-C; see § 249.208a of this chapter.

#### § 249.220f Form 20-F, registration of securities of foreign private issuers pursuant to section 12(b) or (g), annual and transition reports pursuant to sections 13 and 15(d), and shell company reports required under Rule 13a-19 or 15d-19 (§ 240.13a-19 or § 240.15d-19 of this chapter).

(a) Any foreign private issuer, other than an asset-backed issuer (as defined in § 229.1101 of this chapter), may use this form as a registration statement under section 12 (15 U.S.C. 78l) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*), as an annual or transition report filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), or as a shell company report required under Rule 13a-19 or Rule 15d-19 under the Exchange Act (§ 240.13a-19 or 240.15d-19 of this chapter).

(b) An annual report on this form shall be filed within six months after the end of the fiscal year covered by such report.

(c) A transition report on this form shall be filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in § 240.13a-10 or § 240.15d-10 applicable when the issuer changes its fiscal year end.

[47 FR 54781, Dec. 6, 1982, as amended at 70 FR 1625, Jan. 7, 2005; 70 FR 42248, July 21, 2005]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 20-F, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### George Murray Brown and Another, as Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Cornelius Sullivan, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court and judgment of Justice’s Court reversed, with costs. Held, that the trial of the cause in Justice’s Court having been duly adjourned to February 31, 1913, the attempted further adjournment on the day preceding that to which it had been thus regularly adjourned, to March 8,1913, was ineffective, and the justice having failed to appear upon the date to which the cause had been regularly adjourned, lost jurisdiction of the action. We do not pass upon the question as to whether or not this court or the County Court has power to fix a new date for the new trial. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented.
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.11b-4 Definition of “cash transaction” in section 311(b)(4).

The term “cash transaction”, as used in section 311(b)(4), means any transaction in which full payment for goods or securities sold is made within 7 days after delivery of the goods or securities in currency or in checks or other orders drawn upon banks or bankers and payable upon demand.
§ 4.6 Exclusion for certain otherwise regulated persons from the definition of the term “commodity trading advisor.” ( a ) Subject to compliance with the provisions of this section, the following persons, and any principal or employee thereof, shall be excluded from the definition of the term “commodity trading advisor:” ( 1 ) An insurance company subject to regulation by any State, or any wholly-owned subsidiary or employee thereof; *Provided, however,* That its commodity interest advisory activities are solely incidental to the conduct of the insurance business of the insurance company as such; and
( 2 ) A person who is excluded from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” by § 4.5; *Provided, however,* That: ( i ) Its commodity interest advisory activities are solely incidental to its operation of those trading vehicles for which § 4.5 provides relief; and
( ii ) Where necessary, prior to providing any commodity interest trading advice to any such trading vehicle the person files a notice of eligibility as specified in § 4.5 to claim the relief available under that section.
( 3 ) A swap dealer registered with the Commission as such pursuant to the Act or excluded or exempt from registration under the Act or the Commission's regulations; *Provided, however,* That the commodity interest and swap advisory activities of the swap dealer are solely incidental to the conduct of its business as a swap dealer.
( b ) Any person who has claimed an exclusion under this § 4.6 must submit to such special calls as the Commission may make to require the person to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) An exclusion claimed under this § 4.6 shall cease to be effective upon any change which would render the person claiming the exclusion ineligible under paragraph (a) of this section.
[52 FR 41984, Nov. 2, 1987, as amended at 77 FR 9822, Feb. 17, 2012]
§ 242.607 Customer account statements. ( a ) No broker or dealer acting as agent for a customer may effect any transaction in, induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, or direct orders for purchase or sale of, any NMS stock or a security authorized for quotation on an automated inter-dealer quotation system that has the characteristics set forth in section 17B of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q-2), unless such broker or dealer informs such customer, in writing, upon opening a new account and on an annual basis thereafter, of the following: ( 1 ) The broker's or dealer's policies regarding receipt of payment for order flow from any broker or dealer, national securities exchange, national securities association, or exchange member to which it routes customers' orders for execution, including a statement as to whether any payment for order flow is received for routing customer orders and a detailed description of the nature of the compensation received; and
( 2 ) The broker's or dealer's policies for determining where to route customer orders that are the subject of payment for order flow absent specific instructions from customers, including a description of the extent to which orders can be executed at prices superior to the national best bid and national best offer.
( b ) *Exemptions.* The Commission, upon request or upon its own motion, may exempt by rule or by order, any broker or dealer or any class of brokers or dealers, security or class of securities from the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section with respect to any transaction or class of transactions, either unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions, if the Commission determines that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15c2-3 [Reserved]
Opinion filed January 10 , 201 9



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ ___ ____ No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 330

- CR

_____ ___ ___ PAUL TORRES , Appellant
V.
THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 10 6 th District Court Gaines County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 4100

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant
, Paul Torres
, has filed a n untimely notice of appeal in this cause

. Ap pellant attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion for forensic DNA testing

. We dismiss the appeal.
The documents on file in th is case indicate that the order was signed on September 10, 2018
, and that the notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s
office on November 26 , 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal wa s due to be f iled within thirty days after the date that the trial court entered the order

. See T EX

. R.2 A PP

. P. 2 6 .2( a )(1 ); see also T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 64.05 (West 2018 ). A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 25.2(c)(1 ) . The documents on file in this court re flect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed seventy

- seven days after the order was entered . The no tice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to
entertain this appeal. See Swearingen v. State , 189 S.W.3d 779, 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998);
Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519 , 522

– 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State
, 860 S.W.2d 108 , 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).
When th e appeal w as filed in this court , we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue

. Appellant file d a response but has not shown any grounds upon which this appeal may proceed

. W e dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

January 10 , 201 9 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey
, C. J., Willson
, J. , and Wright, S. C.J. 1
Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Life USA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report").  Kelly
Kendall,  President,  CFO & CEO  of the  company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Kelly Kendall
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Kelly Kendall, President, CEO & CFO

Dated:  June 29, 2005