### 46439 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices

and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.

On August 19, 2013, the California State Water Resources Control Board (CA SWRCB) submitted an application titled ‘‘Storm Water Multiple Application and Report System’’ forrevision/modification of its EPAauthorized authorized Part 123 program under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed CASWRCB’s request to revise its EPAauthorized Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revision/modification set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve California’s request to revise its Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR part 122 is being published in the Federal Register

.

CA SWRCB was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized program listed above.

Dated: July 30, 2014. Matthew Leopard, Acting Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2014–18816 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[ER–FRL–9016–3]**

**Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability** 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202)
564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/

. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements, Filed 07/28/2014 Through 08/01/2014 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa. gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html

. EIS No. 20140210, Draft EIS, NPS, NY,

Fire Island National Seashore Draft White-tailed Deer Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 10/10/2014, Contact: Morgan Elmer 303–969–2317 EIS No. 20140211, Final EIS, FHWA, OR, US 97 Bend North Corridor Project, Review Period Ends: 09/08/ 2014, Contact: Michelle Eraut 503–
316–2559 EIS No. 20140212, Draft EIS, FERC, PA,

Multi-Project for Hydropower Licenses, Susquehanna River Hydroelectric Projects, Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Emily Carter 202–502–6512 EIS No. 20140213, Draft EIS, FHWA, AL,

I–10 Mobile River Bridge and Bayway Widening Project No. DPI–0030(005), Comment Period Ends: 11/07/2014, Contact: Mr. Mark D. Bartlett 334–
274–6350 EIS No. 20140214, Final EIS, AFS, OR,

Eden Ridge Timber Sales, Review Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Holly Witt 541–247–3688 EIS No. 20140215, Final EIS, USACE,

FL, Central Everglades Planning Project, Review Period Ends: 09/08/ 2014, Contact: Dr. Gretchen Ehlinger
904–232–1682 EIS No. 20140216, Second Final EIS,

AFS, MT, East Reservoir, Review Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Denise Beck 406–293–7773 x7504 EIS No. 20140217, Draft Supplement,

NNSA, TN, Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor, Comment Period Ends: Contact: Curtis Chambellan 505–845–5073 EIS No. 20140218, Final EIS, APHIS, 00,

Determinations of Nonregulated Status for 2, 4–D-Resistant Corn and Soybean Varieties, Review Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Sid Abel
301–851–3896 EIS No. 20140219, Final EIS, USACE,

NC, NC–1409 (Military Cutoff Road) Extension and Proposed US 17 Homestead Bypass, Review Period Ends: 09/08/2014, Contact: Brad Shaver 910–251–4611
Dated: August 5, 2014. Dawn Roberts, Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014–18820 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL 9914–89–OGC]**

**Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Sierra Club v. McCarthy, Civil Action No. 3:14–cv–00964–JD (N.D. Cal.). On March 3, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint which alleged that Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform a mandatory duty to find that certain states failed to submit state implementation plans (‘‘SIPs’’) for named areas to address certain prevention of significant deterioration (‘‘PSD’’) program requirements for fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 . The proposed consent decree would establish deadlines for EPA to take some of these actions.

**DATES :**  Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received by September 8, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA– HQ–OGC–2014–0585, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred method); by email to oei.docket@
epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Stephanie Hogan, Air and Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 564–3244; fax number: (202) 564–5603; email address: hogan.stephanie@
epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree

The proposed consent decree would resolve a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club seeking to compel the Administrator to take actions under CAA sections 110(k). Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, EPA would agree to sign a notice or notices by no later than August 15, 2014, finding that the States of Vermont, Wisconsin, and California (as to the North Coast Management


### 46440 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices

District) failed to submit SIP revisions addressing the PM2.5 PSD increments and implementing regulations required by the final rule, ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM 2.5 )—Increments, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC),’’ 75 FR 64,864 (Oct. 20, 2010). The proposed consent decree also provides that if any of these States makes a complete submission addressing the requirements prior to August 15, 2014, then EPA’s obligation to take the required action is automatically terminated.

Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, EPA will deliver notice of each action to the Office of the Federal Register for review and publication within 15 days of signature. In addition, the proposed consent decree outlines the procedure for the Plaintiff to request costs of litigation, including attorney fees.

For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the proposed consent decree from persons who are not named as parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of Justice determines that consent to this consent decree should be withdrawn, the terms of the consent decree will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent Decree A. How can I get a copy of the consent decree?

The official public docket for this action (identified by: EPA–HQ–OGC– 2014–0585) contains a copy of the proposed consent decree. The official public docket is available for public viewing at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–1752. An electronic version of the public docket is available through www.regulations.gov. You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then select ‘‘search’’.

It is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not included in the official public docket or in the electronic public docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted material, including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket Center.

B. How and to whom do I submit comments?

You may submit comments as provided in the **ADDRESSES** section. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to consider these late comments.

If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. The electronic public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. In contrast to EPA’s electronic public docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system. If you send an email comment directly to the Docket without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket.

Dated: July 31, 2014. Patricia Embrey, Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014–18828 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9915–01-Region-4; CERCLA–04– 2014–3764]** 

**J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund Site; Sun City, Hillsborough County,**  **Florida; Notice of Settlement**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Notice of settlement.

**SUMMARY :**  Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with Pamela S. Ahlen, J.J. Seifert Land Company and J.J. Seifert Machine Co., Inc. concerning the J.J. Seifert Machine Shop Superfund Site located in Sun City, Hillsborough County, Florida. The settlement is based on a financial analysis and addresses liability for past and future costs concerning work being performed at the Site and allows for the sale of the property.

**DATES :**  The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until September 8, 2014. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the amended settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.