alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                       Ex. 10.39

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                   SHAREHOLDERS' VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AGREEMENT

     SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: F Room
1003, No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDER"), and SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD.
limited liability company (registered address: Room 809, 81 Wencui Rd,
Shengyang) (hereinafter the "PARTICIPATED TARGET COMPANY"), as independent
party, hereby agree to participate in the Shareholders' Voting Rights Proxy
Agreement among FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD., SHANGHAI FOCUS
MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD. and other relevant parties (hereinafter, "PROXY
AGREEMENT") dated March 28 2005. Participating Shareholder and Participated
Target Company agree to entrust the Trustees designated by Focus Media
Technology to exercise the voting rights in Participating Target Company in
respect of 70% of the equity interest in the registered capital of Participating
Target Company held by the Participating Shareholder as of the date of the
Acknowledgement Letter, on behalf of Participating Shareholder.

     Once this Acknowledgement Letter is executed by the Participating
Shareholder and Participating Target Company, Participating Shareholder and
Participated Target Company shall be deemed to have made the same undertakings
and warranties with those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the
Proxy Agreement, agreed to respectively perform the obligations of the
Shareholders and Target Companies stipulated in the Proxy Agreement, and
acknowledged the rights and obligations of the Parties under the Proxy
Agreement.

<PAGE>

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO.,
LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO.,
LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO.,
LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of NationsHealth, Inc. (“NationsHealth”),that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of NationsHealth on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NationsHealth. This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to NationsHealth and will be retainedby NationsHealth and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.        Date: August 15, 2005 By:  /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.    Glenn M. Parker, M.D.    Chief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)      Date: August 15, 2005 By:  /s/ Timothy Fairbanks    Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)
Editorial Note on Part 248
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 248 appear at 74 FR 40431, Aug. 11, 2009.

§ 248.202 Duties of card issuers regarding changes of address. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to a person described in § 248.201(a) that issues a credit or debit card (card issuer).
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Cardholder* means a consumer who has been issued a *credit card* or *debit card* as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1681a(r).
( 2 ) *Clear and conspicuous* means reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information presented.
( 3 ) Other terms not defined in this subpart have the same meaning as in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*).
( c ) *Address validation requirements.* A card issuer must establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures to assess the validity of a change of address if it receives notification of a change of address for a consumer's debit or credit card account and, within a short period of time afterwards (during at least the first 30 days after it receives such notification), the card issuer receives a request for an additional or replacement card for the same account. Under these circumstances, the card issuer may not issue an additional or replacement card, until, in accordance with its reasonable policies and procedures and for the purpose of assessing the validity of the change of address, the card issuer: ( 1 ) ( i ) Notifies the cardholder of the request: ( A ) At the cardholder's former address; or
( B ) By any other means of communication that the card issuer and the cardholder have previously agreed to use; and
( ii ) Provides to the cardholder a reasonable means of promptly reporting incorrect address changes; or
( 2 ) Otherwise assesses the validity of the change of address in accordance with the policies and procedures the card issuer has established pursuant to § 248.201.
( d ) *Alternative timing of address validation.* A card issuer may satisfy the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section if it validates an address pursuant to the methods in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section when it receives an address change notification, before it receives a request for an additional or replacement card.
( e ) *Form of notice.* Any written or electronic notice that the card issuer provides under this paragraph must be clear and conspicuous and be provided separately from its regular correspondence with the cardholder.
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 23, 2022


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2019-B
exv10w69



 








EXHIBIT 10.69




KEY TERMS OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT




	 	 	 
	NAME:
	 	Lisa M. Harper
	 	 	 
	TITLE:
	 	Chief Creative Officer
	 	 	 
	BASE SALARY:
	 	$645,000
	 	 	 
	BONUS PLAN:
	 	Target payout at 100% of base salary.
	 	 	 
	HEALTH BENEFITS:
	 	Medical, dental and vision insurance.
	 	 	 
	401K:
	 	4% match, eligible after 6 months.
	 	 	 
	MANAGEMENT CHANGE OF CONTROL

PLAN:
	 	If involuntary termination, but not for

death, disability or cause, at any time

within 18 months following the change of

control, eligible to receive a payment equal

to three times annual salary and a

pro-rated bonus, in a single lump sum

payment, less applicable taxes, and benefits

coverage for 18 months.
	 	 	 
	MANAGEMENT SEVERANCE PLAN:
	 	Eligible to receive a lump sum severance

payment equal to 50% of gross base salary if

involuntarily terminated other than for

death, disability or cause.
#### Johnson v. Commonwealth.

April 25, 1950.

B. D. Stephenson, Judge.

J. Ervin iS'anders for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Attorney General, and Zeb A. Stewart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Yan Sant, Commissioner

Reversing.

Appellant, Marshall Johnson, has appealed from a judgment sentencing him to confinement for two years in the State Reformatory upon conviction of shooting into the dwelling house of Manuel'Burke. He has assigned four grounds for reversal, only one of which it is necessary for us to consider. That is: The Court erred *675in overruling his motion for a peremptory instruction at the close of the evidence for the Commonwealth. Appellant offered no testimony in his behalf.

On the 21st day of March, 1949, the chief witness for the Commonwealth, Garland Johnson, was burning grass on his property near appellant’s barn. Appellant, with a shotgun in his hand, cautioned his neighbor not to let the fire spread to appellant’s property as it might result in burning the barn. Garland Johnson then ptit out the fire and drove in his truck to the home of Manuel Burke, who lives about 250 yards away. About thirty minutes thereafter, Garland Johnson, Manuel Burke, his wife, Doshia Burke, and their son were sitting on the end of the porch of Burke’s house. Burke saw a flash from a shotgun, and he and the other occupants of the porch heard the report of the gun and pellets strike the roof of Burke’s residence. In a few minutes, a second shot followed but nothing struck the house. The flash and report of the gun came from the direction of the Johnsons’ residence, and a distance of between 450 and 500 feet from the Burke residence. No one saw the person who fired the shot, but within two hours thereafter Garland Johnson procured a warrant for appellant, who was arrested in West Virginia a few miles from the scene of the occurrences we have related.

Where the evidence relied on is circumstantial, it must be such as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, and where the evidence as a whole merely creates a suspicion of guilt, a verdict of acquittal should be directed. Davidson v. Commonwealth, 252 Ky. 354, 67 S. W. 2d 486, and cases therein cited. 'The evidence in this case is wholly circumstantial in respect to the person who fired the shots complained of. There was evidence of bad feeling on the part of appellant toward Garland Johnson. There was no evidence of ill feeling on the part of appellant toward Manuel Burke whose house was sprayed with the shot. Appellant had an opportunity to commit the crime, and it may be said that he had a motive for shooting Garland Johnson, although he failed to do so on a more opportune occasion thirty minutes before the shots complained of were fired. We are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to create a suspicion that appellant was guilty, but it certainly was not sufficient to exclude every hypothesis of inno*676cence, the presumption of which must be accorded defendant throughout the trial.

The Court should have directed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty.

The judgment is reversed.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION


I, Jeffrey S. Levin, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MORGAN STANLEY DIRECT LENDING FUND;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











Dated: March 18, 2022


/s/ Jeffrey S. LevinJeffrey S. LevinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 270.13a-1 Exemption for change of status by temporarily diversified company. A change of its subclassification by a registered management company from that of a diversified company to that of a nondiversified company shall be exempt from the provisions of section 13(a)(1) of the Act (54 Stat. 811; 15 U.S.C. 80a-13), if such change occurs under the following circumstances: ( a ) Such company was a nondiversified company at the time of its registration pursuant to section 8(a) (54 Stat. 803; 15 U.S.C. 80a-8), or thereafter legally became a nondiversified company.
( b ) After its registration and within 3 years prior to such change, such company became a diversified company.
( c ) At the time such company became a diversified company, its registration statement filed pursuant to section 8(b) (54 Stat. 803; 15 U.S.C. 80a-8), as supplemented and modified by any amendments and reports theretofore filed, did not stated that the registrant proposed to become a diversified company.
[Rule N-13A-1, 6 FR 3967, Aug. 8, 1941]
EX-32.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of TS&B Holdings, Inc., (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, James E. Jenkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ James E. JenkinsJames E. Jenkins, President and Chief
Executive Officer November 17, 2003
```

[115th Congress Public Law 354]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5074]]

Public Law 115-354
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric 
      Bostic Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 5205]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5205:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Fourth Addendum to AdCenter License



 Exhibit 10.31 
 FOURTH ADDENDUM TO 
 ADCENTER LICENSE, HOSTING AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Addendum is entered into between IAC Search & Media, a Delaware corporation (“Partner”) and LookSmart, Ltd., a Delaware corporation
(“LookSmart”) and is the fourth addendum to that certain AdCenter License, Hosting and Support Agreement by and between Partner and LookSmart entered into as of May 16, 2005, as amended by the parties in three addenda effective
January 2006, May 2006, and January 2007, respectively (the “Agreement”). 
 This Fourth Addendum is effective as of June 11, 2007.

 Whereas, LookSmart has developed additional functionality to its AdCenter to enable the serving of advertisements in response to the content of viewed web
pages (“Contextual Ad Serving”); and 
 Whereas, pursuant to Section 5(c) of the Agreement, LookSmart wishes to provide this Contextual Ad
Serving functionality to Partner; 
 Therefore, Partner and LookSmart agree as follows: 
 1. Delivery: LookSmart agrees that it will make Contextual Ad Serving available to Partner on June 11, 2007. 
 2. Service Levels: The Service Level Agreement attached to the Agreement as Exhibit A will apply to Contextual Ad Serving, except when the AdCenter is required to retrieve content from Partner Network in order to have a copy or
refresh a copy of the content.
 3. Contextual Ad Serving Metrics: LookSmart will develop a system for measuring latency for those contextual ad calls
that require LookSmart to retrieve content from Partner Network in order to have a copy or refresh a copy of the content (excluding the time required for LookSmart to retrieve the content from Partner Network) (the “Contextual Ad Serving
Metrics”) by August 1, 2007. The Contextual Ad Serving Metrics will not be subject to the existing Service Level Agreement. 
 4. Except as
modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

									
	Partner	 		 	LookSmart, Ltd.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Dominic Butera
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Schoen

	Name:	 	 Dominic Butera
	 		 	Name:	 	 Michael Schoen

	Title:	 	 Chief Financial Officer
	 		 	Title:	 	 Vice President, Product and Technology
### §1862g. Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research

(a) The Director shall operate a program to stimulate competitive research (known as the "Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research"), the purpose of which is to assist those States that—

(1) historically have received relatively little Federal research and development funding; and

(2) have demonstrated a commitment to develop their research bases and improve science and engineering research and education programs at their universities and colleges.

(b) A State which has received an initial award under such Program, whether or not the award was received before or after October 31, 1988, shall be eligible for up to 5 years of additional support under the Program if that State provides assurances of new matching funds and submits an acceptable new plan for using Program funds and matching funds to build the research capabilities of the State.

(Pub. L. 100–570, title I, §113, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2870; Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §103(e)(2), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2975.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 114–329, §103(e)(2)(A), substituted "Established" for "Experimental" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–329, §103(e)(2)(B), substituted "a program to stimulate competitive research (known as the 'Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research')" for "an Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–329, §103(e)(2)(C), substituted "the Program" for "the program".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Planning Grants

Pub. L. 107–368, §26, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3067, provided that: "The Director is authorized to accept planning proposals from applicants who are within .075 percentage points of the current eligibility level for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research. Such proposals shall be reviewed by the Foundation to determine their merit for support under the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research or any other appropriate program."

[For definitions of terms used in section 26 of Pub. L. 107–368, set out above, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–368, set out as a note under section 1862n of this title.]
#### § 229.511 (Item 511) Other expenses of issuance and distribution.

Furnish a reasonably itemized statement of all expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities to be registered, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. If any of the securities to be registered are to be offered for the account of security holders, indicate the portion of such expenses to be borne by such security holder.

*Instruction to Item 511:* Insofar as practicable, registration fees, Federal taxes, States taxes and fees, trustees' and transfer agents' fees, costs of printing and engraving, and legal, accounting, and engineering fees shall be itemized separately. Include as a separate item any premium paid by the registrant or any selling security holder on any policy obtained in connection with the offering and sale of the securities being registered which insures or indemnifies directors or officers against any liabilities they may incur in connection with the registration, offering, or sale of such securities. The information may be given as subject to future contingencies. If the amounts of any items are not known, estimates, identified as such, shall be given.
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M151217A 

 December 22, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON PROJECT AIM 2020, 

9:30 A.M., DECEMBER 17, 2015, COMMISSIONERS’ 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on Project Aim 2020 implementation. Topics 

included prioritization and add/shed procedures, rebaselining the work of the agency, overhead 

consolidation, centers of expertise, Project Aim implementation in NRR, human capital and 

workforce shaping/planning, and next steps. The Chapter Executive Vice President of the 

National Treasury Employees Union also addressed the Commission. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR