alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Forte, Reynaldo 

Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 2:45 PM

To: Eddinger, Jim

Cc: Kokopeli, Peter; Schreifels, Jeremy

Subject: FW: starts for industrial units

Jim – Peter Kokopeli was able to do a brief analysis of the time it takes some industrial boilers to have their controls reducing emissions. Don’t know how helpful 

this will be to you since the number of units is limited. Let me know if you’d like any follow up.

Rey

From: Kokopeli, Peter 

Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 12:58 PM

To: Forte, Reynaldo

Cc: Schreifels, Jeremy

Subject: FW: starts for industrial units

Rey:

The graphic below summarizes starts at 156 industrial CAMD units between 2003 and 2012. The chart shows the average NOx or SO2 rate in the hour after the 

start of generation. The results are generally consistent with the SSM TSD including Wet Lime (FGD) which we believe runs from start of generation. 

This analysis only includes the starts for units reporting load in MWH (as opposed to steam) and that have the controls indicated. Only starts that occurred after 

the control install date are included (with the exception of SNCR). The 10-year time span is needed because industrial have far fewer starts per year than EGUs. 

Note that the unit counts are quite low. We could expand this analysis to include the majority of industrial units reporting steam load but would not be able to 

complete it before June at the earliest due to competing priorities.

- peter
- Peter
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4032 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 2010 

increase in the deduction for start-up expenditures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, and Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the 2010 increase in the deduction for startup expenditures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Entrepreneurs 

5 Create American Jobs Act of 2012’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4032 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR START-UP EXPENSES 

2 MADE PERMANENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (ii) of section 

4 195(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$10,000’’, and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘$60,000’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of 

11 section 195 of such Code is amended by striking para12 graph (3). 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 18, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., Portland, OR; Hilevel Technology, Inc., Irvine, CA; Micro Component Technology, St. Paul, MN; Reid Ashman Manufacturing, St. George, UT; Salland Engineering International BV, Zwolle, THE NETHERLANDS; and Toshiba Corporation Semiconductor Company, Tokyo, JAPAN have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 20, 2004. A notice was published in the                     **Federal                               ( print page 70284)                            Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 18, 2004 (69 FR 51329).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26614  Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §19033. Reporting to Congress

#### (a) Report on resource needs

Not later than 180 days after August 9, 2022, the Director shall provide a report to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate on the resources and the number of full time 1 employees needed to carry out the functions of the office established in section 19031 of this title.

#### (b) Annual report on Office activities

#### (1) In general

Not later than one year after August 9, 2022, and annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to Congress a report on the activities carried out by the Office of Research Security, detailing—

(A) a description of the activities conducted by the Office, including administrative actions taken;

(B) such recommendations as the Director may have for legislative or administrative action relating to improving research security;

(C) identification and discussion of the gaps in legal authorities that need to be improved to enhance the security of institutions of higher education performing research supported by the Foundation; and

(D) information on Foundation Inspector General cases, as appropriate, relating to undue influence and security threats to research and development activities funded by the Foundation, including theft of property or intellectual property relating to a project funded by the Foundation at an institution of higher education.

#### (2) Form

The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in both unclassified and classified formats, as appropriate.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10333, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1552.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "full-time".
Order entered November 29 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00696

- CV

DAVID DIAZ, SCOTT FISHER, AND KRISTI FISHER , Appellant s

V.

SMS FINANCIAL CAP, LLC, CAP ITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, STEPHEN F. PERKINS, AND CHRISTOPHER FITZWATER , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 00653

- 2011

O RDER

Before the Court is appellee SMS Financial Cap, LL C’s November 22, 2021

motion for an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion to the

extent that we extend the deadline to December 31, 2021

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
### §§1851 to 1854. Repealed. Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1125 §9, 64 Stat. 1111

Section 1851, act July 25, 1947, ch. 320, §1, 61 Stat. 422, related to transfer of surplus personal property between War Assets Administration and Federal Works Agency to be utilized in alleviation of suffering caused by flood or other catastrophe.

Section 1852, acts July 25, 1947, ch. 320, §2, 61 Stat. 422; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103, 63 Stat. 380, related to loan or transfer of property to States and local governments.

Section 1853, acts July 25, 1947, ch. 320, §3, 61 Stat. 423; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §§103, 105, 63 Stat. 380, related to utilization of government and State officers and employees and cooperation of Federal agencies with Administrator.

Section 1854, acts July 25, 1947, ch. 320, §4, 61 Stat. 423; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103, 63 Stat. 380, related to authorization of appropriations.

For provisions relating to disaster relief, see section 5121 et seq.) of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3956 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3956

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 71.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Disperse Yellow 71.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE YELLOW 71.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Disperse Yellow     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        71, (7H-                                                           31/2014.......
                        Benzimidazo[2,1-
                        a]benz[de]isoquin
                        olin-7-one, 9(or
                        10)-methoxy-)
                        (CAS No. 68296-59-
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No: II-16-021 April 13, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss 

Agency’s 2015 Assessment of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Tuesday, April 19,

to discuss the agency’s assessment of the Browns Ferry nuclear plant’s three units during 2015. 

The plant, which is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located near Athens, Ala., 

about 32 miles west of Huntsville.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 6 - 7 p.m. in the

Aerospace Training Center Lecture Hall at John C. Calhoun State Community College, 6250 US-31 in 

Tanner, Ala.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Browns Ferry plant, as well as highlights of NRC

inspections.

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Browns Ferry and 

other nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These 

annual meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to 

learn about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing the 2015 Browns Ferry plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review concluded that all three Browns Ferry units operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, the 

plant will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power 

plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Browns Ferry were green in 2015. Current performance information for Browns Ferry

Unit 1, Unit 2, and Unit 3 and more details about NRC inspection and oversight are available on the 

NRC website. Plant performance indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
(September 17, 1953.)

#### In the Matter of Orfeo Cardinali, an Attorney.

Resignation of the above-named Orfeo Cardinali accepted and his name ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3979 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3979

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2012

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2025 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PRODUCTION CERTIFICATE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN 
              PRODUCTS OF UNITED STATES INSULAR POSSESSIONS.

    Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``2015'' and 
inserting ``2025''.
                                 <all>
```
|  |   | FGDC Newsletters- August 1999  March 1999October 1998
- July 1998  May 1998July 1997
- March 1997  November 1996July 1996
- March 1996  November 1995July 1995 |
|--|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Glenn M. Parker, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005         By:  /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.    Glenn M. Parker, MD    Chief Executive Officer
# Subpart 3437.1—Service Contracts—General

**Parent topic:**PART 3437—SERVICE CONTRACTING

## 3437.102 Policy.

If a service contract requires one or more end items of supply, FAR subpart 37.1 and this subpart apply only to the required services.     

## 3437.170 Observance of administrative closures.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.237–71 (Observance of administrative closures) in all solicitations and contracts for services.
### §§1958a to 1958g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1958a, Pub. L. 85–883, §1, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1706, which related to demonstration plants for production of consumptive water from saline water, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.

Section 1958b, Pub. L. 85–883, §2, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1707, which related to contracts for construction, operation, and maintenance of demonstration plants, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.

Section 1958c, Pub. L. 85–883, §3, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1707, which related to acceptance of assistance from State and public agencies, and contracts for such assistance and its use, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.

Section 1958d, Pub. L. 85–883, §4, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1707; Pub. L. 87–295, §2, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 630, provided for termination of authority of the Secretary to construct, operate, and maintain demonstration plants upon the expiration of twelve years after Sept. 2, 1958.

Section 1958e, Pub. L. 85–883, §5, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1708, which related to additional powers of the Secretary, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.

Section 1958f, Pub. L. 85–883, §6, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1708, which related to contracts for construction, materials, and supplies, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.

Section 1958g, Pub. L. 85–883, §7, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1708, which related to authorization of appropriations, was omitted pursuant to section 1958d of this title.
From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:22 AM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: Agenda

As I said on the phone, we would like to focus this meeting on:

1. Mercury

a. Test methods and data manipulation

b. Alternative approaches and subcategorization 

2. Non-mercury metals

a. Floor calculations 

b. Alternatives

3. Technical memo questions

We would love for Barrett Parker to be there, as well as anyone else who can explain the data 

manipulations.

Thanks... 

I will pull up the email that asks for info on the people coming and respond to that one- so I give 

you all the info you need.

sus

Susan J Miller

Vice President, Environment, Health & Safety

Brick Industry Association

311 South Academy Street

Cary, North Carolina 27511

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr., Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     May 10, 2007 /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr. Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer
#### § 229.507 (Item 507) Selling security holders.

If any of the securities to be registered are to be offered for the account of security holders, name each such security holder, indicate the nature of any position, office, or other material relationship which the selling security holder has had within the past three years with the registrant or any of its predecessors or affiliates, and state the amount of securities of the class owned by such security holder prior to the offering, the amount to be offered for the security holder's account, the amount and (if one percent or more) the percentage of the class to be owned by such security holder after completion of the offering.