alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sky Power Solutions Corp. (the “Company”)  on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I Mehboob Charania, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.





/s/ Mehboob CharaniaMehboob CharaniaChief Executive Officer andJune 14, 2011

Principal Financial Officer
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA 14

- 44 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 17 June 2014

IN THE MATTER OF:
D.M.H. Caldwell County No. 11 JA 91
Appeal by respondent from order entered 8 October 2013 by Judge Robert M. Brady in District Court , Caldwell County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 29 May 2014
. No brief filed on behalf of petitioner

- appellee Caldwell County Department of Social Services. Appellate Defender Staples Hughes by Assistant Appellate Defender Annick Lenoir

- Peek for respondent

- appellant. No brief filed on behalf of guardian ad litem.

STROUD , Judge.
Respondent appeals from the trial court’ s order terminating her parental rights to her child Dana. 1 We aff irm
. On 11 June 2013, after Dana had been adjudicated neglected and dependent and in DSS custody for some time with the permanent plan for her being adoption, DSS filed a motion to

1 We use a pseudonym to protect the juvenile ’ s identity.- 2
-

terminate respondent’s parenta l rights alleging neglect, failure
to make reasona ble progress , failure to pay for the cost of care
of Dana, and abandonment
. On 8 October 2013, the trial court terminated respondent’s parental rights based upon all four grounds. Respondent appealed. Respondent’s appellate counsel has filed a no

- merit brief in which s he states s he “has conducted a conscientious and thorough review of the record on appeal and all material in the underlying case files ” and she concludes that this appeal presents “ no issue of merit on which to base an argument for relief or that would alter the result .” See N.C.R. App. P. 3.1(d). Included in respondent’s brief was a letter respondent’s counsel wrote to respondent in accordance with Rule 3.1(d), advising respondent of counsel’s inability to fin d error and of respondent’s right to file her own arguments directly with this Court
. R espondent has not filed her own written arguments. After carefully reviewing the transcript and record,

we also are unable to find any possible prejudicial error in th e trial court ’ s order
. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court ’s order terminating respondent’s parental rights to Da na . AFFIRMED. Judge s CALABRIA and DAVIS concur.- 3
-

Report per Rule 30(e).
Part 550 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions

550.001 Definitions.

Parent topic: General Services Administration Acquisition Manual

550.001 Definitions.

“Approving authority,” as used in FAR 50, means GSA’s Administrator.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.13n-12 Exemption from requirements governing security-based swap data repositories for certain non-U.S. persons. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section— ( 1 ) *Non-U.S. person* means a person that is not a U.S. person.
( 2 ) *U.S. person* shall have the same meaning as set forth in Rule 3a71-3(a)(4)(i) (§ 240.3a71-3(a)(4)(i)).
( b ) A non-U.S. person that performs the functions of a security-based swap data repository within the United States shall be exempt from the registration and other requirements set forth in section 13(n) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(n)), and the rules and regulations thereunder, provided that each regulator with supervisory authority over such non-U.S. person has entered into a memorandum of understanding or other arrangement with the Commission that addresses the confidentiality of data collected and maintained by such non-U.S. person, access by the Commission to such data, and any other matters determined by the Commission.
[80 FR 14550, Mar. 19, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Medical Media Television,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on May 16, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
Philip M. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Philip M. Cohen
----------------------------------
Philip M. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMAYTION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,136 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,274 
<INVENTORY>                                     10,505  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,447 
<PP&E>                                          15,370 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     744 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,216 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,061  
<BONDS>                                         65,945 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             0    
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,116     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,216       
<SALES>                                         38,696       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,696       
<CGS>                                           16,870       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,774        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,397  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,729         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,801)           
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,058         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,859)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0   
<CHANGES>                                            0       
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,859)        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0  
                                

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 97-50971

_______________________

BETTY A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GALEN HOSPITAL CORPORATION, formerly known as Humana Village Oaks, doing business as Village Oaks Medical Center; COLUMBIA/HCA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS,
Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CV-737)

_________________________________________________________________ August 20, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having considered this appeal in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record, we find no reversible error of fact or law. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
523.404 Agency affirmative procurement

programs.

GSA’s affirmative procurement program is located within subpart 523.1, Sustainable Acquisition

Policy.

Parent topic: Subpart 523.4 - Use of Recovered Materials and Biobased Products
Subpart 549.1 - General Principles

Parent topic: Part 549 - Termination of Contracts

549.111 Review of proposed settlements.

The HCA may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement agreements at a level

above the contracting officer.
#### Ludmila Cermak et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bata Akciova Spolecnost, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Ludmila Cermak, Plaintiff, v. Bata Akciova Spolecnost, Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Marie Hozova, Plaintiff, v. Bata Akciova Spolecnost, Defendant. (Action No. 3.) Marie T. Bata, Plaintiff, v. Bata A. S., Defendant. (Action No. 4.) Patrick J. Hangley, as Temporary Receiver of New York Assets of Bata A. S., Appellant; Ludmila Cermak et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — ■ Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.24b-3 Information filed by issuers and others under sections 12, 13, 14, and 16. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section and in § 240.17a-6, each exchange shall keep available to the public under reasonable regulations as to the manner of inspection, during reasonable office hours, all information regarding a security registered on such exchange which is filed with it pursuant to section 12, 13, 14, or 16, or any rules or regulations thereunder. This requirement shall not apply to any information to the disclosure of which objection has been filed pursuant to § 240.24b-2, which objection shall not have been overruled by the Commission pursuant to section 24(b). The making of such information available pursuant to this section shall not be deemed a representation by any exchange as to the accuracy, completeness, or genuineness thereof.
( b ) In the case of an application for registration of a security pursuant to section 12 an exchange may delay making available the information contained therein until it has certified to the Commission its approval of such security for listing and registration.
(Sec. 24, 48 Stat. 901, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 78x)
[16 FR 3109, Apr. 10, 1951]
#### § 1402.2 Background.

As a result of numerous electrocutions which have occurred when consumers contacted powerlines with CB base station and outside TV antennas while putting these antennas up or taking them down, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined that it is necessary to require that warnings and instructions be furnished with these antennas and their supporting structures so that consumers can be made aware of the hazards involved and of safe ways to put up and take down these antennas. The Commission anticipates that this regulation will help protect the public against the unreasonable risk of injury associated with CB base station antennas, outside TV antennas, and supporting structures due to contact with overhead powerlines.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15c1-9 Use of pro forma balance sheets.

The term *manipulative, deceptive, or other fraudulent device or contrivance,* as used in section 15(c)(1) of the Act, is hereby defined to include the use of financial statements purporting to give effect to the receipt and application of any part of the proceeds from the sale or exchange of securities, unless the assumptions upon which each such financial statement is based are clearly set forth as part of the caption to each such statement in type at least as large as that used generally in the body of the statement.

(Sec. 2, 52 Stat. 1075; 15 U.S.C. 78*o*)

[13 FR 8205, Dec. 22, 1948]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Life USA, Inc. (the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Wesley F. Whiting,
Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



                                                /s/Wesley F. Whiting
                                                ----------------------
                                                 Wesley F. Whiting, Acting CFO



  Dated:  May 21, 2007
#### § 274.51 Form N-18F-1, for notification of election pursuant to § 270.18f-1 of this chapter.

(a) This form shall be filed with the Commission in triplicate as the notification of election pursuant to § 270.18f-1 of this chapter by a registered open-end investment company to commit itself to pay in cash all redemptions requested by a shareholder of record as provided in said section.

[36 FR 11920, June 23, 1971 as amended at 36 FR 20504, Oct. 23, 1971; 39 FR 36003, Oct. 7, 1974; 59 FR 52701, Oct. 19, 1994]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form N-18F-1, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
RECEIVED IN



### ___ (\ , t ^ , COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# %:• Do/uw, lU-^7 - bUl Ab©tAcosta,Glerk AUG 26 2015



# (J-iil^DODllQ^J^
, \j 

## Tk, S"Wk gf T***ft 

## 4W« -h'L fL «v\do*J YYU-Uv tVEx40vntU p^Tik^g 1T Fit f P/I 

# 4t/\fita, lAii/i'k "Hu GX)04-4W" Hln'i- 15 tool- &• U^cL* oUl^, 

# lillv, Ut,§^*\rmpor<-»••» NO. '5 k, 3%^ IN THE TEXAS COURT

vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, RESPONDENT § OF CRIMINAL APPEALS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PDR TO THE HONORABLEJUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: Comes now, iP/Hh fl*K )^U.)H. , Petitioner, and files this motion for an extension ofsixty (60) day lavs in which to file a Peti Petition for Discretionary Review. In support ofthis motion, Petitioner shows the Court the following: I. ThePetitioner was convicted in the (aL-^ Texas ofthe offense of -^-^cjucjUj^H L^nti<fl ,ct Court of 

## I in CauseNo. 3^, #£>&' 

# 0. County, 

### styled The State ofTexas vs. %_ 

## Appeals, J3T^~ SupremeJudicial District, AppealNo. I 3 -\H~Oao Li&~ol{ The case was affirmed on 

## l fcmjpvli/lOK-. The Petitioner appealed to the Court of

II. The present deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review is ThePetitionerhas notrequested anyextension priorto thisrequest. III. Petitioner's request for an extension is based upon the following facts: Petitioner was not 

## informed ofthe decision ofthe Court ofAppeals in affirming his case until J~"^Q'~~U • Since that time Petitioner has been attempting to gain legal representation in this matter. His 

### attorney on the appeal, MvL) $\r»e.C > has informed PetitionerthatMwill not represent him on the Petition for Discretionary Review. 

### y-zi-ir,>-' WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays this Court grant this motion and extend the deadline for 

### filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in Cause No. 3^/ &&%~ to Respectfully submitted,


### ^ 7. ^ X^ Petitioner Pro Se ^ • TDCJ# IS^9oC Texas Department ofCriminal Justice
§ 229.1404 (Item 1404) Loan portfolio. ( a ) As of the end of the latest reported period, present separately the amount of loans in each category for which disclosure is required in the financial statements that are due: ( 1 ) In one year or less,
( 2 ) After one year through five years,
( 3 ) After five years through 15 years, and
( 4 ) After 15 years.
( b ) For each loan category for which disclosure is provided in response to paragraph (a), present separately the total amount of loans in such loan category that are due after one year that ( 1 ) Have predetermined interest rates and
( 2 ) Have floating or adjustable interest rates.
Instructions to Item 1404: 1. Report scheduled repayments in the maturity category in which the payment is due. 2. Report demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity, and overdrafts as due in one year or less. 3. Determinations of maturities shall be based upon contractual terms. However, to the extent that non-contractual rollovers or extensions are included for purposes of measuring the allowance for credit losses under U.S. GAAP or IFRS, include such non-contractual rollovers or extensions for purposes of the maturities classification and briefly discuss this methodology.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.105 Form 5, annual statement of beneficial ownership of securities.

This Form shall be filed pursuant to Rule 16a-3 (§ 240.16a-3 of this chapter) for annual statements of beneficial ownership of securities. The Commission is authorized to solicit the information required by this Form pursuant to sections 16(a) and 23(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78p(a) and 78w(a)); and sections 30(h) and 38 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-29(h) and 80a-37), and the rules and regulations thereunder. Disclosure of information specified on this Form is mandatory. The information will be used for the primary purpose of disclosing the holdings of directors, officers and beneficial owners of registered companies. Information disclosed will be a matter of public record and available for inspection by members of the public. The Commission can use the information in investigations or litigation involving the federal securities laws or other civil, criminal, or regulatory statutes or provisions, as well as for referral to other governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations. Failure to disclose required information may result in civil or criminal action against persons involved for violations of the federal securities laws and rules.

[56 FR 7274, Feb. 21, 1991, as amended at 72 FR 45112, Aug. 10, 2007]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 5, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3914 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3914

To amend the Export Apple Act to permit the export of apples to Canada 
  in bulk bins without certification by the Department of Agriculture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Export Apple Act to permit the export of apples to Canada 
  in bulk bins without certification by the Department of Agriculture.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BULK SHIPMENT OF APPLES TO CANADA.

    (a) Bulk Shipment of Apples to Canada.--The Export Apple Act is 
amended by inserting after section 4 (7 U.S.C. 584) the following new 
section:
    ``Sec. 4A.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, apples 
may be shipped to Canada in bulk bins without complying with the 
provisions of this Act.''.
    (b) Definition of Bulk Bin.--Section 9 of the Export Apple Act (7 
U.S.C. 589) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) The term `bulk bin' means a bin that contains a 
        quantity of apples weighing more than 100 pounds.''.
    (c) Regulations.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall issue 
regulations to carry out the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 10.7 Date of entry of orders.

In computing any period of time involving the date of the entry of an order the date of entry shall be the date the order is served by the Proceedings Clerk.

[41 FR 2511, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 60 FR 54801, Oct. 26, 1995]