alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4056 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prevent a State 

or political subdivision thereof from conducting or requiring duplicative 

inspections of establishments in which a drug or device is manufactured, 

processed, packed, or held by a manufacturer or wholesale distributor 

of the drug or device. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2012 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. LEWIS of California, 

Mr. ROYCE, Mr. CALVERT, Mrs. BONO MACK, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prevent a State or political subdivision thereof from conducting or requiring duplicative inspections of establishments in which a drug or device is manufactured, processed, packed, or held by a manufacturer or wholesale 

distributor of the drug or device. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Science and Tech5 nology Regulatory Relief Act of 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4056 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO INSPECT. 

2 Section 704 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

3 Act (21 U.S.C. 374) is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(h) LIMITATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO IN6 SPECT.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para8 graph (2), no State or political subdivision of a 

9 State may conduct or require an inspection of a fac10 tory, warehouse, or establishment in which a drug or 

11 device is manufactured, processed, packed, or held 

12 by a manufacturer or wholesale distributor of the 

13 drug or device, for introduction into interstate com14 merce or after such introduction, for purposes of 

15 verifying compliance with— 

16 ‘‘(A) the requirements of— 

17 ‘‘(i) section 351 of the Public Health 

18 Service Act; or 

19 ‘‘(ii) this Act; or 

20 ‘‘(B) any similar requirements established 

21 pursuant to State law. 

22 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) does not 

23 apply to an inspection of such a factory, warehouse, 

24 or establishment by a State or a political subdivision 

25 of a State in any of the following circumstances: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4056 IH

1 ‘‘(A) The State or political subdivision (or 

2 a department or agency thereof) makes a deter3 mination, based on receipt of a complaint or 

4 otherwise, that a drug or device presents a 

5 threat of serious adverse health consequences or 

6 death, and the inspection relates to such risk. 

7 ‘‘(B) The Secretary orders a recall of a 

8 drug, biological product, or device manufac9 tured, processed, packed, or held at the factory, 

10 warehouse, or establishment, and the inspection 

11 relates to such recall. 

12 ‘‘(C) The Secretary requests or authorizes 

13 the State to conduct or require the inspection.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2348

WANDA HUNT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE AND RICE; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00857-HFF)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wanda Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Michael J. Bogle, Samuel W. Outten, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v.

Greenville County , No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000038630-MAY-201208:54 AM
# 523.404 Agency affirmative procurement programs.

GSA’s affirmative procurement program is located within subpart  523.1, Sustainable Acquisition Policy.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 523.4 - Use of Recovered Materials and Biobased Products
### §1862p–3. Sustainable chemistry basic research

The Director shall establish a Green Chemistry Basic Research program to award competitive, merit-based grants to support research into green and sustainable chemistry which will lead to clean, safe, and economical alternatives to traditional chemical products and practices. The research program shall provide sustained support for green chemistry research, education, and technology transfer through—

(1) merit-reviewed competitive grants to individual investigators and teams of investigators, including, to the extent practicable, young investigators, for research;

(2) grants to fund collaborative research partnerships among universities, industry, and nonprofit organizations;

(3) symposia, forums, and conferences to increase outreach, collaboration, and dissemination of green chemistry advances and practices; and

(4) education, training, and retraining of undergraduate and graduate students and professional chemists and chemical engineers, including through partnerships with industry, in green chemistry science and engineering.

(Pub. L. 111–358, title V, §509, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4009.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Reauthorization Act of 2010, and also as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2010, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Coordination of Sustainable Chemistry Research and Development

Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §114, Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2993, provided that:

"(a) Importance of Sustainable Chemistry.—It is the sense of Congress that—

"(1) the science of chemistry is vital to improving the quality of human life and plays an important role in addressing critical global challenges, including water quality, energy, health care, and agriculture;

"(2) sustainable chemistry can reduce risks to human health and the environment, reduce waste, improve pollution prevention, promote safe and efficient manufacturing, and promote efficient use of resources in developing new materials, processes, and technologies that support viable long-term solutions to a significant number of challenges;

"(3) sustainable chemistry can stimulate innovation, encourage new and creative approaches to problems, create jobs, and save money; and

"(4) a coordinated effort on sustainable chemistry will allow for a greater return on research investment in this area.

"(b) Sustainable Chemistry Basic Research.—Subject to the availability of appropriated funds, the Director of the [National Science] Foundation may continue to carry out the Sustainable Chemistry Basic Research program authorized under section 509 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 1862p–3)."

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 502 of Pub. L. 111–358, set out as a note under section 1862p of this title.
539.7001 Policy.

(a)GSA must provide information security for the information and information system that support

the operations and assets of the agency, including those provided or managed by another agency,

contractor, or other source.

(b)Employees responsible for procuring or managing information technology supplies, services and

systems shall possess the appropriate security clearance associated with the level of security

classification related to the acquisition. They include, but are not limited to contracting officers,

contract specialists, project/program managers, and contracting officer representatives.

(c)The contracting officer or contracting officer’s representative shall validate that all applicable

contractor submissions meet contract requirements (e.g., statement of work, contractor’s accepted

proposal) and are provided by the contractor in accordance with the contract schedule. The

contracting officer or contracting officer’s representative shall coordinate with GSA IT as needed in

determining contractor compliance. Guidance for identifying the applicable GSA IT point of contact

is located on the Acquisition Portal at https://insite.gsa.gov/itprocurement.

Parent topic: Subpart 539.70 Requirements for GSA Information Systems
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: September 30,2004

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Casualty Company
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago, IL 60685


13F File Number:  28-387

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
November 15,2004
Chicago, Illinois,60685
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which Continental Casualty Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA
Financial Corporation on behalf of Continental Casualty Company.
<Page>
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT









|1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2019 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as seller, servicer
            (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2019-A, as issuer, and I have made, or have caused to be
            made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during
            the period from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March 28, 2023




By:  /s/ Ole
        Jensen


Name:  Ole Jensen


Title:  Vice
      President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
#### Benjamin Hamowitz v. Ara Vortabedian, Doing Business as Van Alst Service Station.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur • — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, J-J.
§ 242.405 Withdrawal of margin. ( a ) *By the customer.* Except as otherwise provided in § 242.404(e)(1)(ii) of this Regulation (§§ 242.400 through 242.406), cash, securities, or other assets deposited as margin for positions in an account may be withdrawn, provided that the equity in the account after such withdrawal is sufficient to satisfy the required margin for the security futures and related positions in the account under this Regulation (§§ 242.400 through 242.406).
( b ) *By the security futures intermediary.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the security futures intermediary, in its usual practice, may deduct the following items from an account in which security futures or related positions are held if they are considered in computing the balance of such account: ( 1 ) Variation settlement payable, directly or indirectly, to a clearing agency that is registered under section 17A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q-1) or a derivatives clearing organization that is registered under section 5b of the CEA (7 U.S.C. 7a-1);
( 2 ) Interest charged on credit maintained in the account;
( 3 ) Communication or shipping charges with respect to transactions in the account;
( 4 ) Payment of commissions, brokerage, taxes, storage and other charges lawfully accruing in connection with the positions and transactions in the account;
( 5 ) Any service charges that the security futures intermediary may impose; or
( 6 ) Any other withdrawals that are permitted from a securities margin account under Regulation T, to the extent permitted under applicable margin rules.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo ROCHIN-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10507.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007 *.

Filed March 19, 2007.

Jonathan Baghdassarian Granoff, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deeon-cini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

*589Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rodrigo Rochin-Silva appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rochin-Silva’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

June 30, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M160620B

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM – MEETING WITH 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 

9:00 A.M., MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2016, COMMISSIONERS’ 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission held a meeting with the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear 

Energy to provide the Commission with information regarding items of mutual interest on June 

20, 2016. Representatives from DOE, John Kotek, John Kelly, Ray Furstenau, and John 

Carmack from Idaho National Laboratory presented on DOE activities. The topics included 

DOE activities in the area of advanced reactors, the light water reactor sustainability program, 

accident tolerant fuel program, grants and fellowships, and developing human capital for the 

nuclear sector (through universities and research and development programs). 

In addition, NRC staff briefed the Commission on activities and planning efforts for advanced 

reactor work, the status of small modular reactor licensing activities, subsequent license 

renewal, research, and the NRC grants program. 

The staff should ensure good communication and transparency with respect to the potential 

schedule for the NuScale design certification. 

The staff should continue to come to the Commission with new issues or policy questions that 

come up in the review of NuScale or any advanced non-light water reactor. 

 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.17Ad-24 Exemption from clearing agency definition for certain registered security-based swap dealers, registered security-based swap execution facilities, and entities engaging in dealing activity in security-based swaps that are eligible for an exception under § 240.3a71-2(a) (or subject to the period set forth in § 240.3a71-2(b)). A registered security-based swap dealer, a registered security-based swap execution facility, or an entity engaging in dealing activity in security-based swaps that is eligible for an exception under § 240.3a71-2(a) (or subject to the period set forth in § 240.3a71-2(b)) shall be exempt from inclusion in the term “clearing agency,” as defined in section 3(a)(23)(A) of the Act, where such registered security-based swap dealer, registered security-based swap execution facility, or entity engaging in dealing activity in security-based swaps that is eligible for an exception under § 240.3a71-2(a) (or subject to the period set forth in § 240.3a71-2(b)) would be deemed to be a clearing agency solely by reason of: ( a ) Functions performed by such institution as part of customary dealing activities or providing facilities for comparison of data respecting the terms of settlement of securities transactions effected on such registered security-based swap execution facility, respectively; or
( b ) Acting on behalf of a clearing agency or participant therein in connection with the furnishing by the clearing agency of services to its participants or the use of services of the clearing agency by its participants.
[86 FR 7643, Feb. 1, 2021]
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 079

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Clarence A. Johnson, Respondent, v. Syracuse Dry Goods Company and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT AND MODIFICATION OF AREA NAVIGATION 

(RNAV) ROUTES; ATLANTA, GA 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0891 

Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-37 

PROPOSED RNAV T-ROUTES 

GAD 

TDG 

SCAIL JACET 

P-:-E 

,VNA
§ 41.47 Withdrawal of margin. ( a ) *By the customer.* Except as otherwise provided in § 41.46(e)(1)(ii) of this subpart, cash, securities, or other assets deposited as margin for positions in an account may be withdrawn, provided that the equity in the account after such withdrawal is sufficient to satisfy the required margin for the security futures and related positions in the account under this Regulation (Subpart E, §§ 41.42 through 41.49).
( b ) *By the security futures intermediary.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the security futures intermediary, in its usual practice, may deduct the following items from an account in which security futures or related positions are held if they are considered in computing the balance of such account: ( 1 ) Variation settlement payable, directly or indirectly, to a clearing agency that is registered under section 17A of the Exchange Act or a derivatives clearing organization that is registered under section 5b of the Act;
( 2 ) Interest charged on credit maintained in the account;
( 3 ) Communication or shipping charges with respect to transactions in the account;
( 4 ) Payment of commissions, brokerage, taxes, storage and other charges lawfully accruing in connection with the positions and transactions in the account;
( 5 ) Any service charges that the security futures intermediary may impose; or
( 6 ) Any other withdrawals that are permitted from a securities margin account under Regulation T, to the extent permitted under applicable margin rules.