alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §18971. Expanding opportunities through the Manufacturing USA Program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of such other Federal agencies as the Secretary of Commerce considers relevant, shall coordinate with existing and new Manufacturing USA institutes to integrate covered entities as active members of the Manufacturing USA institutes, including through the development of preferences in selection criteria for proposals to create new Manufacturing USA institutes or renew existing Manufacturing USA institutes that include one or more covered entities.

#### (b) Covered entities

For purposes of this subsection, a covered entity is—

(1) an historically Black college and university;

(2) a Tribal College or University;

(3) a minority-serving institution;

(4) a minority business enterprise (as such term is defined in section 1400.2 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulation); or

(5) a rural-serving institution of higher education (as such term is defined in section 1161q of title 20).

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, §10262, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1504.)
5341.204 GSA Area-wide Contracts       (c)(1)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5341.2 – ACQUIRING UTILITY SERVICES
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




     January 20, 2006



     Dear Michael:



     Covad Communications Group, Inc. (“Covad”) hereby confirms to you that your employment shall
terminate on March 2, 2006 (the “Employment Termination Date”). Effective as of the date of this
letter, and ending on the Employment Termination Date, you shall be a non-officer employee of
Covad. You are no longer authorized to incur any expenses on behalf of Covad, unless they are
reimbursable in accordance with Covad’s normal expense reimbursement policies. Your current salary
and benefits remain unchanged.



     With respect to termination of your employment, provided you satisfy the applicable
eligibility requirements set forth in Section 3 of Covad’s Executive Severance Plan, Covad shall
provide you with the benefits provided under Section 5 of Covad’s Executive Severance Plan. You
will not be entitled to any other benefits from Covad other than: (1) reasonable relocation costs
for your return to Canada; and (2) those provided by Covad’s Executive Severance Plan.



     You remain bound by the terms of that certain Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement
(“Confidentiality Agreement”) previously executed by you.



     The terms set forth herein represent our entire agreement with respect to the matters covered
herein and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements, whether written or oral with the
exception of the Confidentiality Agreement, Covad’s Executive Severance Plan, and your stock option
agreements. No modification shall be effective unless in a written document executed by you and
Covad.



     If you accept our offer then please sign and return this letter to us at your earliest
convenience.



Covad Communications Group, Inc.:




	 	 	 
	/s/ Charles Hoffman
 


	 	 
	By:             Charles Hoffman
	 	 
	Title:          President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 






     I am pleased to accept the terms set forth herein.



	 	 	 
	P. Michael Hanley
	 	 
	 
	/s/ P. Michael Hanley
 


	 	 
	Signature
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	P. Michael Hanley
 


	 	 
	Name
	 	 





Date:
January 21, 2006
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Acid Black 244, 

(Chromate(2-), (Cobaltate(1-), and (Chromate(1-). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Acid Black 

244, (Chromate(2-), (Cobaltate(1-), and (Chromate(1-). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF ACID BLACK 244, (CHROMATE(2- 

4 ), (COBALTATE(1-), AND (CHROMATE(1-). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3957 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of Acid Black 244, 

(Chromate(2-), [3-(hydroxykO)-4-[2-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1- 

naphthalenyl]diazenyl-kN2]- 

1-naphthalenesulfonato(3- 

)][1-[2-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-[2- 

(4-methoxyphenyl) 

diazenyl]phenyl]diazenylkN2]-2-naphthalenolato(2)- 

kO]-, sodium (1:2)) (CAS 

No. 30785–74–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.12.45) and 

(Cobaltate(1-), bis[2-[2-[5- 

(aminosulfonyl)-2-(hydroxykO)phenyl] diazenyl-kN1]-3- 

(oxo-kO)-Nphenylbutanamidato(2-)]-, sodium (1:1)) (CAS No. 72496- 

88-9) (provided for in subheading 3204.12.45) and 

(Chromate(1-), bis[3-[4-[2- 

[5-chloro-2-(hydroxykO)phenyl]diazenyl-kN1]-4,5- 

dihydro-3-methyl-5-(oxo-kO)- 

1H-pyrazol-1- 

yl]benzenesulfonamidato (2- 

)]-, sodium (1:1)) (CAS No. 

67800–97–9) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.12.45) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                                 MetLife, Inc.
                Summary of Non-Management Director Compensation

     The following non-management director compensation arrangements will take
effect on April 25, 2006, the date of MetLife, Inc.'s 2006 Annual Meeting:

     1. Annual retainer of $225,000, of which $112,500 will be payable in cash
        and $112,500 will be payable in MetLife, Inc. common stock grants. The
        entire retainer will be in the form of a one-time payment payable on the
        date of the MetLife, Inc. Annual Meeting; provided, however, that the
        amount of the retainer will be adjusted on a pro rata basis for
        directors newly elected to the Board during the period between MetLife,
        Inc.'s Annual Meetings. MetLife, Inc. common stock grants will be
        rounded up to the next whole share at the closing price of MetLife, Inc.
        common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the award day;

     2. An annual retainer of $25,000 will be payable in cash to each Chair of
        a Board Committee, such payment to be made concurrently with the payment
        of the annual retainer;

     3. An annual retainer of $25,000 will be payable in cash to the presiding
        Lead Director, such payment to be made concurrently with the payment of
        the annual retainer;

     4. An annual retainer of $25,000 will be payable in cash to the Chair of
        the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Investment Committee, such
        payment to be made concurrently with the payment of the annual retainer;
        and

     5. No fees will be paid for directors' attendance at meetings.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Wilson                     August 14, 2006
------------------------                Date
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer
#### Thomas Reaney, Respondent, v. Katherine C. A. Fay and Another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ.
#### Eileen M. Fink, Appellant, *v.*Marshall E. Fink, Respondent.

*737
      *Per Curiam.*

We have reached the conclusion that the order denying the motion for a new trial or hearing on the issue of domicile should, in the interests of justice, be reversed because of events transpiring after the hearings were concluded. The proceedings are accordingly remitted to the Special Term for a new hearing by the court on the issue of the defendant’s domicile. This holding necessitates the reversal of the order confirming • the report of the Official Referee and denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction and for alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees. Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction and for alimony and counsel fees will be held in abeyance pending the determination by the Special Term of the issue of the defendant’s domicile. Plaintiff’s appeal from the order denying her cross motion to disaffirm the report of the Official Referee is dismissed as academic. Settle order on notice.

Grlennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order denying motion for a new trial or hearing on the issue of domicile unanimously reversed and the proceedings remitted to Special Term for a new hearing as to the issue of domicile. Plaintiff’s motion for. an injunction and for alimony and counsel fees will be held in abeyance pending the determination by Special Term of the issue of defendant’s domicile. Plaintiff’s appeal from the order denying her cross motion to disaffirm the report of the Official Referee dismissed as academic. Stay continued. Settle order on notice.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.45

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                   TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF
                     WASTE ROCK FROM THE JOHNSON CAMP MINE"

This document is an amendment ("Amendment") to the "Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Waste Rock from the Johnson Camp Mine" dated February 25, 2004
("Agreement") between Nord Resources Corporation ("Seller") and JC Rock, LLC
("Purchaser").

Seller hereby agrees to reduce the royalty from $2.00 per ton to $1.50 per ton
on fines and rock sold by Purchaser to individuals, companies or organizations
where the sales price to such individuals, companies or organizations is $6.00
per ton or greater, FOB Johnson Camp.

Dated May 1, 2005

NORD RESOURCES CORPORATION              JC ROCK, LLC


By:                                     By:
    ---------------------------------        -----------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Kelly Kendall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Life USA, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2004; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 10, 2004


/s/ Kelly Kendall
--------------------------
 Kelly Kendall, CEO, & CFO
Exhibit 24.2


                        Consent of Huddleston & Co., Inc.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of The Coastal Corporation on Form S-8 relating to The Coastal Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and The Coastal Corporation 1997
Directors Stock Plan of our report under the captions "Business-Gas System
Reserves" and "Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities
(Unaudited)" appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of The Coastal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in this Registration
Statement.




HUDDLESTON & CO., INC.

/S/ PETER D. HUDDLESTON
------------------------------------------------
Peter D. Huddleston, P.E.
President

Houston, Texas
August 24, 2000
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1213 

CA 12-00915 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

 

STILLWATER HYDRO PARTNERS, LP, 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STILLWATER HYDRO ASSOCIATES, LLC, 

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

MELVIN & MELVIN, PLLC, SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH A. GENUNG OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

JOSHUA A. SABO, TROY, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H.

Fandrich, A.J.), entered August 15, 2011 in a declaratory judgment

action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted,

and judgment is granted in favor of plaintiff as follows: 

It is ADJUDGED AND DECLARED that defendant is not

entitled to the use of the escrow funds to pay for the cost

of replacing the trash rack cleaner. 

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion

seeking summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action. We

agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in denying the motion.

The parties entered into an asset purchase agreement (APA) for

defendant’s purchase of a hydroelectric plant from plaintiff. The APA

included an escrow agreement as security for the performance of the

APA. At issue is whether defendant is entitled to the use of the

escrow funds of $75,000 to pay for the cost of replacing the trash

rack cleaner, which became inoperable within six months after the

closing. It is axiomatic that “a written agreement that is complete,

clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the

plain meaning of its terms” (Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 NY2d

562, 569; see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 162). Here,

although the parties correctly agree that the APA is unambiguous, they

disagree with respect to the “plain meaning of its terms” (Greenfield,

98 NY2d at 569). Paragraph 3.2 states in relevant part: “Suitability

of Assets: Disclaimer. Subject to matters set forth in Schedule 3.2,

the Purchased Assets . . . are suitable for the purposes for which
-2- 1213 

CA 12-00915 

they have been operated . . . and to Seller’s Knowledge are not

currently in need of replacement or material repair” (italicized

emphasis added). Schedule 3.2 states in relevant part: “Trash rack

cleaner is also wearing out and may need replacement.” We conclude

that, by its terms, the APA excludes from the warranty of suitability

the matters set forth in schedule 3.2, including the trash rack

cleaner at issue. 

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Amended Form 8-A replaces former Form 8-C; see § 249.208a of this chapter.

#### § 249.210 Form 10, general form for registration of securities pursuant to section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This form shall be used for registration pursuant to section 12 (b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of classes of securities of issuers for which no other form is prescribed.

(Secs. 7, 10, 19(a), 48 Stat. 78, 81, 85; secs. 205, 209, 48 Stat. 906, 908; sec. 8, 68 Stat. 685; 15 U.S.C. 77g, 77j, 77s(a); secs. 12, 13, 14, 15(d), 23, 48 Stat. 892, 894, 895, 901; sec. 203(a), 49 Stat. 704; secs. 1, 3, 8, 49 Stat. 1375, 1377, 1379; sec. 202, 68 Stat. 686; secs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 78 Stat. 565-568, 569, 570-574, 88a; secs. 1, 2, 3, 82 Stat. 454, 455; secs.1, 2, 3-5, 28(c), 84 Stat. 1435, 1479; sec. 105(b), 88 Stat. 1503; secs. 8, 9, 10, 18, 89 Stat. 117, 118, 119, 155 (15 U.S.C. 78*l,* 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78w))

[33 FR 18995, Dec. 20, 1968]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 10 see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3b-16 Definitions of terms used in Section 3(a)(1) of the Act. ( a ) An organization, association, or group of persons shall be considered to constitute, maintain, or provide “a market place or facilities for bringing together purchasers and sellers of securities or for otherwise performing with respect to securities the functions commonly performed by a stock exchange,” as those terms are used in section 3(a)(1) of the Act, (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(1)), if such organization, association, or group of persons: ( 1 ) Brings together the orders for securities of multiple buyers and sellers; and
( 2 ) Uses established, non-discretionary methods (whether by providing a trading facility or by setting rules) under which such orders interact with each other, and the buyers and sellers entering such orders agree to the terms of a trade.
( b ) An organization, association, or group of persons shall not be considered to constitute, maintain, or provide “a market place or facilities for bringing together purchasers and sellers of securities or for otherwise performing with respect to securities the functions commonly performed by a stock exchange,” solely because such organization, association, or group of persons engages in one or more of the following activities: ( 1 ) Routes orders to a national securities exchange, a market operated by a national securities association, or a broker-dealer for execution; or
( 2 ) Allows persons to enter orders for execution against the bids and offers of a single dealer; and ( i ) As an incidental part of these activities, matches orders that are not displayed to any person other than the dealer and its employees; or
( ii ) In the course of acting as a market maker registered with a self-regulatory organization, displays the limit orders of such market maker's, or other broker-dealer's, customers; and ( A ) Matches customer orders with such displayed limit orders; and
( B ) As an incidental part of its market making activities, crosses or matches orders that are not displayed to any person other than the market maker and its employees.
( c ) For purposes of this section the term *order* means any firm indication of a willingness to buy or sell a security, as either principal or agent, including any bid or offer quotation, market order, limit order, or other priced order.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, the terms *bid* and *offer* shall have the same meaning as under § 242.600 of this chapter.
( e ) The Commission may conditionally or unconditionally exempt any organization, association, or group of persons from the definition in paragraph (a) of this section.
[63 FR 70918, Dec. 22, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 37617, June 29, 2005]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 31, 2017

a0522 

# Order

Clerk May 31, 2017

153974(32)

MATTHEW J. BRAZYS and MARY

ELIZABETH BRAZYS,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 153974

COA: 330391

Allegan CC: 12

- 049809

- CH

DAVID ASHEN, d/b/a D.A.’S PAINTING

COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 7,

2017 order is considered, and it i s DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

JackB. Buchold certifies as follows:

 

3.               I am the Chief Financial Officer of The BankHoldings.

 

4.               The Form 10-Q of The Bank Holdings forthe Quarter Ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of The BankHoldings.

 

 
| Date:  | May 6,  2008 |                    | /s/ Jack B. Buchold |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|   |              | THE BANK HOLDINGS       |
|   |              | Jack B. Buchold         |
|   |              | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----