alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.11d1-1 Exemption of certain securities from section 11(d)(1). A security shall be exempt from the provisions of section 11(d)(1) with respect to any transaction by a broker and dealer who, directly or indirectly extends or maintains or arranges for the extension or maintenance of credit on the security to or for a customer if: ( a ) The broker and dealer has not sold the security to the customer or bought the security for the customer's account; or
( b ) The security is acquired by the customer in exchange with the issuer thereof for an outstanding security of the same issuer on which credit was lawfully maintained for the customer at the time of the exchange; or
( c ) The customer is a broker or dealer or bank; or
( d ) The security is acquired by the customer through the exercise of a right evidenced by a warrant or certificate expiring within 90 days after issuance, provided such right was originally issued to the customer as a stockholder of the corporation issuing the security upon which credit is to be extended. The right shall be deemed to be issued to the customer as a stockholder if he actually owned the stock giving rise to the right when such right accrued, even though such stock was not registered in his name; and in determining such fact the broker and dealer may rely upon a signed statement of the customer which the broker and dealer accepts in good faith; or
( e ) Such broker and dealer would otherwise be subject to the prohibition of section 11(d)(1) with respect to 50 percent or less of all the securities of the same class which are outstanding or currently being distributed, and such broker and dealer sold the security to the customer or bought the security for the customer's account on a day when he was not participating in the distribution of any new issue of such security. A brokerdealer shall be deemed to be participating in a distribution of a new issue if ( 1 ) he owns, directly or indirectly, any undistributed security of such issue, or
( 2 ) he is engaged in any stabilizing activities to facilitate a distribution of such issue, or
( 3 ) he is a party to any syndicate agreement under which such stabilizing activities are being or may be undertaken, or
( 4 ) he is a party to an executory agreement to purchase or distribute such issue.
[13 FR 8184, Dec. 22, 1948, as amended at 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 certification of Chief Financial Officer





I, Cindy Lea Gimler, Chief Financial Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.

        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November 14, 2008/s/ Cindy Lea GimlerName:Title:

        Cindy Lea GimlerChief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
#### In the Matter of the Application of Walter W. Walsh for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Connecticut.)

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
§ 270.22d-1 Exemption from section 22(d) to permit sales of redeemable securities at prices which reflect sales loads set pursuant to a schedule. A registered investment company that is the issuer of redeemable securities, a principal underwriter of such securities or a dealer therein shall be exempt from the provisions of section 22(d) to the extent necessary to permit the sale of such securities at prices that reflect scheduled variations in, or elimination of, the sales load. These price schedules may offer such variations in or elimination of the sales load to particular classes of investors or transactions, *Provided,* That: ( a ) The company, the principal underwriter and dealers in the company's shares apply any scheduled variation uniformly to all offerees in the class specified;
( b ) The company furnishes to existing shareholders and prospective investors adequate information concerning any scheduled variation, as prescribed in applicable registration statement form requirements;
( c ) Before making any new sales load variation available to purchasers of the company's shares, the company revises its prospectus and statement of additional information to describe that new variation; and
( d ) The company advises existing shareholders of any new sales load variation within one year of the date when that variation is first made available to purchasers of the company's shares.
(Secs. 6(c) (15 U.S.C. 80a-6(c)) and 38(a) (15 U.S.C. 80a-37(a)))
[50 FR 7911, Feb. 27, 1985]
EDSP

2nd List 

OPP issues 

FIFRA/FFDCA 

orders using existing 

policies and 

procedures

OPPT issues 

SDWA §1457/FFDCA

orders using SDWA 

policies and 

procedures

Pesticide 

Active 

Ingredient?

Data?

Evaluate Data

Orphan 

Chemical

Data?

Evaluate Data

SDWA

1457?

Recipients?

1st – IUR

2nd -- Other

EDSP List 1

Orphan

Process for Issuing EDSP Second List Test Orders

No

Yes

Yes No

No Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

September 20, 2010

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Preventio

U.S. Environmental Protection Agen
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Chronology: Western Greyhound Lines, 1945-67

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Chronology: Western Greyhound Lines, 1945-67 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1595*,												Washington, D.C: 								The Bureau, 										May 1968,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4912,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
###### Editorial Note on [Part 240](/current/title-17/part-240?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at [57 FR 36501](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-36501), Aug. 13, 1992, and [57 FR 47409](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-47409), Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.14a-18 Disclosure regarding nominating shareholders and nominees submitted for inclusion in a registrant's proxy materials pursuant to applicable state or foreign law, or a registrant's governing documents.

To have a nominee included in a registrant's proxy materials pursuant to a procedure set forth under applicable state or foreign law, or the registrant's governing documents addressing the inclusion of shareholder director nominees in the registrant's proxy materials, the nominating shareholder or nominating shareholder group must provide notice to the registrant of its intent to do so on a Schedule 14N ([§ 240.14n-101](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.14n-101)) and file that notice, including the required disclosure, with the Commission on the date first transmitted to the registrant. This notice shall be postmarked or transmitted electronically to the registrant by the date specified by the registrant's advance notice provision or, where no such provision is in place, no later than 120 calendar days before the anniversary of the date that the registrant mailed its proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting, except that, if the registrant did not hold an annual meeting during the prior year, or if the date of the meeting has changed by more than 30 calendar days from the prior year, then the nominating shareholder or nominating shareholder group must provide notice a reasonable time before the registrant mails its proxy materials, as specified by the registrant in a Form 8-K ([§ 249.308 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-249.308)) filed pursuant to Item 5.08 of Form 8-K.

Instruction to [§ 240.14](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.14)a-18.

The registrant is not responsible for any information provided in the Schedule 14N ([§ 240.14n-101](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-240.14n-101)) by the nominating shareholder or nominating shareholder group, which is submitted as required by this section or otherwise provided by the nominating shareholder or nominating shareholder group that is included in the registrant's proxy materials.

[[75 FR 56787](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-56787), Sept. 16, 2010]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3975 

To amend title V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to extend 

the provisions of the Pediatric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2012 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan (for himself and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act to extend the provisions of the Pediatric Medical 

Device Safety and Improvement Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PEDIATRIC MEDICAL DEVICE 

4 SAFETY AND IMPROVEMENT ACT. 

5 (a) HUMANITARIAN DEVICE EXEMPTION EXTEN6 SION.—Section 520(m)(6)(A)(iv) of the Federal Food, 

7 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(m)(6)(A)(iv)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

9 (b) DEMONSTRATION GRANTS TO IMPROVE PEDI10 ATRIC DEVICE AVAILABILITY.—Section 305(e) of PediVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:18 Feb 09, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3975.IH H3975

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3975 IH

1 atric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act (Public 

2 Law 110–85; 42 U.S.C. 282 note)) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE FOR RULE RELATING TO

5 TRACKING OF PEDIATRIC USES OF DEVICES.—Notwith6 standing subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 

7 5, the United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Ad8 ministrative Procedures Act’’) and any other provision of 

9 law, the proposed rule issued by the Commissioner of Food 

10 and Drugs entitled ‘‘Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of 

11 Devices; Requirement for Submission of Information on 

12 Pediatric Subpopulations That Suffer From a Disease or 

13 Condition That a Device Is Intended to Treat, Diagnose, 

14 or Cure,’’ 75 Fed. Reg. 16365 (April 1, 2010), shall take 

15 effect on January 1, 2013, unless such Commissioner 

16 issues the final rule before such date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 1, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Workflow Management Coalition (“WfMC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, FL. The nature and scope of WfMC's standards development activities are: standardization of terminology, definitions, formats, quality, apparatuses and procedures for the production, use and deployment of workflow process systems and related data. Standards, recommended practices, and technical reports prepared in accordance with WfMC's policies and procedures are intended to have broad national acceptance, as well as provide the basis upon which to achieve international accord in the development of ISO standards.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27064 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No: 16-047 August 4, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Comment on Draft Environmental Impact Statement

for Reno Creek In Situ Recovery Project in Wyoming

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is asking the public to comment on a draft report on the 

environmental impacts from a new uranium recovery facility proposed for Wright, Wyo., in Campbell 

County. The report contains the NRC’s preliminary conclusion that the environmental impacts of the 

Reno Creek in situ uranium recovery facility would not preclude issuing a license to operate for 20 

years.

AUC LLC applied in October 2012 for the license necessary to build, operate and ultimately 

decommission the proposed facility. Reno Creek would use the in situ leach process to recover uranium 

from underground ore and convert the recovered uranium into yellowcake for use in the production of 

nuclear fuel.

The NRC draft report analyzes environmental impacts specific to the Reno Creek site, and 

mitigation strategies to reduce or avoid adverse effects on the surrounding environment. The staff is 

conducting a separate technical review to analyze safety aspects of the application. The NRC expects to 

complete that review by Sept. 30.

The NRC published a notice asking for comments in the July 7 Federal Register. The notice 

includes details on how to submit comments. On July 21, the NRC extended the comment period until 

September 6. More information on the application can be found on the NRC’s website.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/David A. Wilson                                November 14, 2005
--------------------------------                  -----------------
David A. Wilson                                   Date
Chief Financial Officer
§ 171.44 Notice of appeal. ( a ) *Time to file.* Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the National Futures Association in a member responsibility action may, within thirty days of the service of the notice described in § 171.42, file with the Proceedings Clerk and serve on the National Futures Association a notice of appeal. The filing of such a notice shall not stay the effective date of the decision.
( b ) *Contents.* The notice of appeal shall meet the content requirements of § 171.23(b).
( c ) *Filing fee.* Each notice of appeal must be accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee of $100. This amount may be paid by check, bank draft or money order, payable to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
( d ) *Defective notices of appeal.* Notices of appeal that are untimely or not accompanied by the filing fee shall not be accepted by the Proceedings Clerk absent a showing, by motion, of excusable neglect.
#### John Stafford, Plaintiff, v Viacom, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Jackson Voice Data, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants; SCS Systems, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Other Captions.)

[818 NYS2d 782]

In an action to recover damages for personal *391injuries, the third-party defendant SCS Systems, Ltd., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated April 15, 2005, which denied its motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The facts relevant to this appeal are set forth in *Stafford v Viacom, Inc.,*32 AD3d 388 [2006] [decided herewith]).

The third-party defendant SCS Systems, Ltd. (hereinafter SCS), failed to demonstrate, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). SCS failed to establish the absence of any triable issues of fact as to whether it controlled the work or had the authority to control, supervise, or direct the work which allegedly gave rise to the plaintiffs injuries. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1551-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1551-DR), dated September 16, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 17, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective November 17, 2004. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-26704 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clinton Harrell, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting him of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degre and assault in the second degree. Defendant also appeals from the sentence and from an order of said court denying his motion for *1052inspection of the Grand Jury minutes and for dismissal of the indictment on the ground that it was based on insufficient and incompetent evidence. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. The proof was insufficient to meet the requirements of section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Although the accomplice testified that-two certain notes had been given to him by appellant, which notes could have been considered as tending to connect appellant with the commission of the crimes, there was no proof linking appellant with the notes independent of the testimony of the accomplice. Appeal from so much of the order as denied the motion for an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes dismissed. Such a motion is addressed to the discretion of the court and is not appealable. No separate appeal lies from the order' insofar as it denied the motion to dismiss the indictment nor from the sentence, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. The motion to dismiss the indictment was properly denied. An indictment is presumed to be based on sufficient legal evidence, unless proof to the contrary appears. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
#### B. F. Goodrich Company, Respondent, v. Albert M. Zimbrich, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.