alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ted S. Smith, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures****andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 12, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Ted  S. Smith        |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                     |   | Ted S. Smith             |
|                     |   | Chief Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
Wärtsilä North America Inc

29 Aug. 2013

To: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Attn: Sara Carlson

Subject: Generic Budgetary Estimate Wartsila SCR System

Dear Sara,

In follow up to your request I have put together a budgetary estimate for the cost of

the SCR and installation for one engine on a MODU. Please note that firm price

cannot be quoted without precise data on the engine particulars and an onboard

audit/survey.

This is based on engines between 4,000 to 8,000kW output.

This pricing is for 1 engine only.

A. Standard Scope of Supply (for 1 engine)

Standard SCR equipment

Consisting of mixing duct and mixing elements, Reactor housing, Catalyst

elements, Reducing agent injection system, Reducing agent dosing system,

Control and automation system, Pump station and one pump as standby

(typically one per plant), Automatically operated on-line soot blowing system

(for diesel and dual fuel applications).

Heaters

May be necessary if average exhaust temperatures are not kept above 300C

Silencer with spark arrestor

B. Generic Cost for Above Equipment

250,000 Euro ($332,025 as per exchange rate 29 August 2013)

C

. Estimated Installation Cost

The approximate installation time for this Generic Budgetary estimate is

18 to 25 days with 2 crews working 12 hours per day.

The estimated cost for installing 1 unit is $310,000.

If more than one then the time and cost per unit will reduce some.Wärtsilä North America Inc

Included in the installation costs:

x Engineering Site Survey

x Engineering package

x Engineering consumables, drawings etc.

x Installation team

x Commissioning engineer

x Travel Time (1 round trip per man)

x Travel Costs

x Prefabrication labor and materials up to $25,000.

x Project Management

x Urea tank insulation

Any additional material or work will be discussed and quoted for approval prior to

commencing. Any delay in the work beyond our control will be charged at standby

time.

Not included

x Cranes on site

x Barges on Site

x Other barge transportation and material handling related costs

x Scaffolding

x New NOX analyzers

x Customs, taxes, freight, transport

x Heating coils for Urea tank

x Class approval of engineering package

x Personnel for fire watches.

x Welding of Pad-eyes for rigging purposes. It is presumed that existing padeyes will be adequate

x Classification and permits.

Yours truly,

Matts Andersson

Wartsila NA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES 1
AND 2OF THE COMPANY'S 1997 FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                      7,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,764
<PP&E>                                          77,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,718
<BONDS>                                         23,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,109
<SALES>                                         54,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,730
<CGS>                                           31,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,450
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
MP5315.606-90 Receipt, Evaluation, and

Disposition of Unsolicited Proposals

(a) Unsolicited proposals (UP) are defined at FAR 2.101 and described in FAR 15.603(c).

MAJCOMs/FLDCOMs/DRUs/DAFRCO and subordinate contracting units are considered to be the

cognizant points of contact for ensuring evaluation and disposition of a UP which is received at their

respective base/activity. Organizations that are part of the Headquarters Air Force (HAF) that

receive a submission that is considered a UP must forward it to SAF/AQC for assignment to the

proper Department of the Air Force (DAF) MAJCOM/FLDCOM/DRU/DAFRCO contracting unit

cognizant point of contact.

(b) Cognizant points of contact:

(1) Coordinate and process UPs. Use a cover sheet to help protect the UP from unauthorized

disclosure.

(2) Notify the SCO for any UP that requires wider DAF consideration.

(3) Maintain an accurate and complete record of the disposition of all UPs received.

(4) Ensure the appropriate evaluation office is aware of the FAR guidance for evaluating UPs and the

prohibitions and rules regarding copying, disclosing, and using restricted data contained in the

proposal. Limit the distribution of UPs to the appropriate number of evaluators required to conduct

a reasonable review. Maintain a record of the evaluators for each UP and the dates of their

evaluation.

(5) Ensure evaluators provide supporting rationale for their conclusions and recommendations. If the

recommendation is to accept the UP, ensure evaluators indicate whether funds are currently

available or programmed.

(6) Notify the offeror concerning results of the evaluation within 30 working days from receipt of the

UP. When the evaluation cannot be completed within 30 working days, send the offeror an interim

reply to include an estimated completion date.

(7) Advise the offeror that the favorable evaluation does not, in itself, contractually bind the

government.

Parent topic: MP5315.6 — UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
#### City of Chicago, appellee, v. John B. Donaldson, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,229.

Prosecution for a breach of the peace. Defendant convicted. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Richardson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Reversed.

Opinion filed November 29, 1922.

John A. Ulrich, for appellant. Samuel A. Ettelson and Louis P. Piquett, for appellee; Daniel Webster, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### David Gorfinkel, Plaintiff, v. First National Bank in Yonkers, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Sylvester W. Del Bello, Individually and as Committee of Ellen Snyder, Also Known as Ellen Elliott, a Deceased Incompetent Person, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

In an action by the beneficiary of a trust account against a bank to recover the sums on deposit at the time of the withdrawal of the funds by the committee of the incompetent depositor without court order, the third-party-defendant (the committee) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 13, 1960, denying his motion to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause, and also on the ground of insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Capital  Beverage  Corporation  (the
Company") on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Carmine Stella, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

/s/Carmine Stella

Carmine Stella
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
#### Seaview Chef, Inc., Respondent, v Transamerica Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action by a mortgagee on a policy of fire insurance, defendant Transamerica Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 24, 1977, as denied its motion for a protective order. Order modified by adding thereto, after the provision that the motion for a protective order is denied, a further provision that such denial is as to those reports, writings, etc., which were prepared and received by appellant prior to January 3, 1977, and that the motion for a protective order is granted as to such items which were prepared and received by appellant after that date. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The fire occurred on or about October 24, 1976. On January 3, 1977 a report was received from the fire department which indicated that the fire was of suspicious origin. At that time, appellant had "substantial bona fide reasons to investigate the legitimacy of the loss” *(Mold Maintenance Serv. v General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.,*56 AD2d 134, 135; see, also *Kent v Maryland Cas. Co.,*25 AD2d 653). Although the *1044claim had not yet been rejected, it appears that reports made to it beyond that time were intended to aid in the resistance of the claim and prepared for litigation (cf. *Millen Ind. v American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co.,*37 AD2d 817; CPLR 3101, subd [d]). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40237 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN LAURIANO

- ESTEBAN, also known as Juanito Esteban Juan , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1379

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Lauriano

- Esteban raises argument s that are foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 562

- 63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the gen eric, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age

- differential requirement. He also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 18 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40237 Document: 00513722210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 16

- 40237

2 v. Elizondo

- Hernande z , 755 F.3d 779, 781

- 82 (5th Cir. 2014), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of sexual abuse of a minor. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-40237 Document: 00513722210 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.3a67-2 Categories of security-based swaps. For purposes of section 3(a)(67) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(67), and the rules thereunder, the terms *major security-based swap category, category of security-based swaps* and any similar terms mean either of the following categories of security-based swaps: ( a ) *Debt security-based swaps.* Any security-based swap that is based, in whole or in part, on one or more instruments of indebtedness (including loans), or on a credit event relating to one or more issuers or securities, including but not limited to any security-based swap that is a credit default swap, total return swap on one or more debt instruments, debt swap, debt index swap, or credit spread.
( b ) *Other security-based swaps.* Any security-based swap not described in paragraph (a) of this section.
| + NASA Homepage+ NASA en Español+ Marte en Español+ Mars Home+ MER Home**Summary**                     Coming Soon                                                + Freedom of Information Act+ The President's Management Agenda+ FY 2002 Agency Performance and                              accountability report+ NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer, and                              Accessiblity Certification+ Freedom to Manage                           Last Updated: + Comments and Questions |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 249
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 249.323 Form 15, certification of termination of registration of a class of security under section 12(g) or notice of suspension of duty to file reports pursuant to sections 13 and 15(d) of the Act. ( a ) This form shall be filed by each issuer to certify that the number of holders of record of a class of security registered under section 12(g) of the Act is reduced to less than 300 persons, or that the number of holders of record of a class of security registered under section 12(g) of the Act is reduced to less than 500 persons and the total assets of the issuer have not exceeded $10 million on the last day of each of the issuer's most recent three fiscal years. Registration terminates 90 days after the filing of the certificate or within such shorter time as the Commission may direct.
( b ) This form shall also be filed by each issuer required to file reports pursuant to section 15(d) of the Act, as a notification that the duty to file such reports is suspended pursuant to section 15(d) of the Act because all securities of each class of such issuer registered under the Securities Act of 1933 are held of record by less than 300 persons at the beginning of its fiscal year, or otherwise pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12h-3 (17 CFR 240.12h-3).
(Secs. 12(g)(4), 12(h), 13(a), 15(d), 23(a), 48 Stat. 892, 894, 895, 901; sec. 203(a), 49 Stat. 704; secs. 3, 8, 49 Stat. 1377, 1379; secs. 3, 4, 6, 78 Stat. 565-568, 569, 570-574; sec. 18, 89 Stat. 155; sec. 204, 91 Stat. 1500; 15 U.S.C. 78 l (g)(4), 78 l (h), 78m(a), 78o(d), 78w(a))
[49 FR 12690, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 25362, July 14, 1986; 61 FR 21356, May 9, 1996] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting Form 15, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
                Washington, D.C.  20549

                       Form 10-QSB

                     Amendment No. 1

[ X ]	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996

[    ]	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 . . . . . to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

               Commission file number 0-21087

                Tollycraft Yacht Corporation
  (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its 
   charter)

                           Minnesota
        (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or 
        organization)
 
                           41-1735422
               (IRS Employer Identification No.)

          2200 Clinton Avenue, Kelso, Washington  98626
             (Address of principal executive offices)

                        (360) 423-5160
                   (Issuer's telephone number)

      Check whether the issuer (1) filed all the reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act during the past twelve months (or for such shorter 
period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing 
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes _______ No _X___

          APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

      State the number of shares outstanding of each of the 
issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practible 
date:   55,000,000 as of 10-20-96

      Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check 
one):
Yes _______ No __X____

<PAGE>

This Amendment No. 1 is submitted to include the Financial Data Schedule which
was not picked up in the first electronic submission.

                                [Signatures]

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused 
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


Tollycraft Yacht Corporation
    (Registrant)

Date: ___________________________


___/s/______________________________
D.R. Cooley
President
Chief Operating Officer


___/s/______________________________
(Signature)
William H. Lee
Controller
§ 37.400 Core Principle 4—Monitoring of trading and trade processing. The swap execution facility shall: ( a ) Establish and enforce rules or terms and conditions defining, or specifications detailing: ( 1 ) Trading procedures to be used in entering and executing orders traded on or through the facilities of the swap execution facility; and
( 2 ) Procedures for trade processing of swaps on or through the facilities of the swap execution facility; and
( b ) Monitor trading in swaps to prevent manipulation, price distortion, and disruptions of the delivery or cash settlement process through surveillance, compliance, and disciplinary practices and procedures, including methods for conducting real-time monitoring of trading and comprehensive and accurate trade reconstructions.