alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.®(ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 25, 2006
§ 230.241 Solicitations of interest. ( a ) *Solicitation of interest.* At any time before making a determination as to the exemption from registration under the Act under which an offering of securities will be conducted, an issuer or any person authorized to act on behalf of an issuer may communicate orally or in writing to determine whether there is any interest in a contemplated offering of securities exempt from registration under the Act. Such communications are deemed to be an offer of a security for sale for purposes of the antifraud provisions of the Federal securities laws. No solicitation or acceptance of money or other consideration, nor of any commitment, binding or otherwise, from any person is permitted until the issuer makes a determination as to the exemption to be relied on and the offering, meeting the requirements of the exemption, is commenced.
( b ) *Conditions.* The communications must state that: ( 1 ) The issuer is considering an offering of securities exempt from registration under the Act, but has not determined a specific exemption from registration the issuer intends to rely on for the subsequent offer and sale of the securities;
( 2 ) No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response, will not be accepted;
( 3 ) No offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the issuer determines the exemption under which the offering is intended to be conducted and, where applicable, the filing, disclosure, or qualification requirements of such exemption are met; and
( 4 ) A person's indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind.
( c ) *Indications of interest.* Any written communication under this section may include a means by which a person may indicate to the issuer that such person is interested in a potential offering. The issuer may require the name, address, telephone number, and/or email address in any response form included pursuant to this paragraph (c).
[86 FR 3596, Jan. 14, 2021]
§ 210.11-03 Presentation of financial forecast. ( a ) A financial forecast may be filed in lieu of the pro forma condensed statements of comprehensive income required by § 210.11-02(a)(1). ( 1 ) The financial forecast shall cover a period of at least 12 months from the latest of ( i ) the most recent balance sheet included in the filing or
( ii ) the consummation date or estimated consummation date of the transaction.
( 2 ) The forecasted statement of comprehensive income shall be presented in the same degree of detail as the pro forma condensed statement of comprehensive income required by § 210.11-02(a)(3).
( 3 ) Assumptions particularly relevant to the transaction and effects thereof should be clearly set forth.
( 4 ) Historical condensed financial information of the registrant and the business acquired or to be acquired, if any, shall be presented for at least a recent 12 month period in parallel columns with the financial forecast.
( b ) Such financial forecast shall be presented in accordance with the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
( c ) Forecasted earnings per share data shall be substituted for pro forma per share data.
( d ) This section does not permit the filing of a financial forecast in lieu of pro forma information required by U.S. GAAP or IFRS-IASB.
[47 FR 29837, July 9, 1982, as amended at 83 FR 50208, Oct. 4, 2018; 85 FR 54069, Aug. 31, 2020]
### §1384. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVI, §1604, as added July 25, 1962, Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §141(a), 76 Stat. 204, related to operation of State plans, prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 92–603, Oct. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 1465, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Puerto Rico, Guam, and Virgin Islands

Enactment of subchapter XVI of the Social Security Act [this subchapter] by Pub. L. 92–603, eff. Jan. 1, 1974, was not applicable to Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. See section 303(b) of Pub. L. 92–603, set out as a note under section 301 of this title. Therefore, as to Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, section 1604 of the Social Security Act [this section] as it existed prior to reenactment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 92–603 continues to apply and reads as follows:

#### §1384. Operation of State plans

If the Commissioner of Social Security, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing to the State agency administering or supervising the administration of the State plan approved under this subchapter, finds—

(1) that the plan has been so changed that it no longer complies with the provisions of section 1332 of this title; or

(2) that in the administration of the plan there is a failure to comply substantially with any such provision;

the Commissioner of Social Security shall notify such State agency that further payments will not be made to the State (or, in the Commissioner's discretion, that payments will be limited to categories under or parts of the State plan not affected by such failure), until the Commissioner of Social Security is satisfied that there will no longer be any such failure to comply. Until the Commissioner is so satisfied the Commissioner shall make no further payments to such State (or shall limit payments to categories under or parts of the State plan not affected by such failure).

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVI, §1604, as added July 25, 1962, Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §141(a), 76 Stat. 204; amended Aug. 15, 1994, Pub. L. 103–296, title I, §107(a)(4), 108 Stat. 1478.)

[Amendment by section 107(a)(4) of Pub. L. 103–296 effective Mar. 31, 1995, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 103–296, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 401 of this title.]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 5, 2005                                                                                    |  | 

---



QuickLinks
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

From: Joseph McDonald 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 

Re: Nelson, Santini and Barnes 2009 EVS-24 Paper 

A hard copy of the following citation: 

Nelson, P.A., Santini, D.J., Barnes, J. “Factors Determining the Manufacturing Costs of Lithium-Ion 

Batteries for PHEVs,” 24th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and 

Exposition EVS-24, Stavenger, Norway, May 13-16, 2009 (www.evs24.org). 

is available within EPA’s Docket Center. 

This document has been copyrighted and is not available in the electronic docket. Parties that wish to 

view a hard copy of this document can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, 

Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742. 

Document Abstract: 

In this study, we developed a model for calculating the costs of lithium-ion batteries supporting electric 

drive in light duty passenger vehicles (LDVs). The model calculates the annual materials requirements 

from design criteria for the battery pack including power, capacity, number of cells, and cell chemistry 

parameters. The costs of capital equipment, plant area and labor for each step in the manufacturing 

process were estimated for a baseline plant. These costs are adjusted for each battery pack studied by 

comparing the processing rate pertinent for each step (area to be coated, number of cells to be tested, 

etc.) with that of the baseline process and applying correction factors. We applied the cost modelling 

method to batteries with four lithium-ion cell chemistries and for several levels of capacity and power. 

For quality assurance purposes, electrode coating thicknesses are limited to 100 microns by the model. 

The result of this restriction is that as the capacity of the cells is increased to achieve longer range 

under electric power, the electrode area and the cell power are also increased and the power of the 

entire battery pack is also increased. In simulations of our reference chemistry for 16, 32 and 48 -km 

PHEVs there is almost no cost increase for increasing the pack power from 40 to 60kW; for PHEVs 

with 48- and 64 km electric range, there was almost no additional cost for power up to 90 kW. For a set 

value of pack energy storage, a small number of high capacity cells are much less expensive to 

manufacture than a large number of low-capacity cells. The useable fraction of the state-of-charge 

range for a battery system is shown to be an important cost factor. In view of cost similarities, the 

choice of cell chemistry will probably depend more on proven safety, reliability, and long life rather than 

on initial cost.
§ 201.52 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Office or Division of the Commission may file an answer to the application. Unless the Office or Division of the Commission counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If counsel for the Office or Division of the Commission and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted upon request by agency counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of that position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, it shall include supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 201.55.
### §19194. Research awards

#### (a) In general

The Director shall make awards, on a competitive basis, to institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations (or consortia of such institutions or organizations)—

(1) to expand research efforts to better understand the factors contributing to, and consequences of, sex-based and sexual harassment affecting individuals in the STEM workforce, including students and trainees; and

(2) to examine approaches to reduce the incidence and negative consequences of such harassment.

#### (b) Use of funds

Activities funded by an award under this section may include—

(1) research on the sex-based and sexual harassment experiences of individuals, including in racial and ethnic minority groups, disabled individuals, foreign nationals, sexual-minority individuals, and others;

(2) development and assessment of policies, procedures, trainings, and interventions, with respect to sex-based and sexual harassment, conflict management, and ways to foster respectful and inclusive climates;

(3) research on approaches for remediating the negative impacts and outcomes of such harassment on individuals experiencing such harassment;

(4) support for institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations to develop, adapt, implement, and assess the impact of innovative, evidence-based strategies, policies, and approaches to policy implementation to prevent and address sex-based and sexual harassment;

(5) research on alternatives to the power dynamics, hierarchical, and dependent relationships, including but not limited to the mentor-mentee relationship, in academia that have been shown to create higher levels of risk for and lower levels of reporting of sex- based and sexual harassment; and

(6) establishing a center for the ongoing compilation, management, and analysis of organizational climate survey data.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, §10534, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1628.)
#### Overseas Raw Materials Corporation et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Victor B. Coster, Appellant-Respondent.

On defendant’s appeal, the order insofar as it granted the motion dismissing the second counterclaim (the first counterclaim against plaintiffs Van Ommeren and Sterling Grace), and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs and the motion denied. On plaintiffs’ appeal, the order insofar as it denied the motion to dismiss the first and third counterclaims unanimously affirmed, with costs. As to the second counterclaim, the affidavits reveal an issue of fact with respect to the performance of the underlying contract between Overseas and defendant. On the pleadings, the documents and affidavits presented, it is not possible to say without the benefit of trial that the claim of illegality is sustained with respect to the agreement made before incorporation and the subsequent employment agreement. It does not inevitably follow that these agreements violate public policy merely because the discretion of the board of directors is purportedly controlled. Cases involving stockholders’ agreements are not necessarily conclusive. (See, e.g. *Mansfield*v. *Lang,*293 Mass. 386.) Nor is it clear on the face of the documents or from the affidavits that the individual plaintiffs did not make a continuing promise to provide for the continued employment of defendant Coster by the plaintiff Overseas. With respect to the first counter*1022claim (the first and only counterclaim against plaintiff Overseas), for the reasons noted above, it is not clear, in the present status of the case, that the charge of illegality is established. With respect to the third counterclaim (the second counterclaim against plaintiffs Yan Ommeren and Sterling Grace), plaintiff does not sufficiently set forth the evidentiary facts to establish that the counterclaim, as alleged and averred, is without basis. It is merely asserted generally that the Panamanian corporation never progressed beyond the initial stage of incorporation, and the agreement claimed by defendant Coster is likewise generally denied. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1142.]
| **General (Narrative) (Details)**                                    | Sep. 30, 2013 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Percentage owned of outstanding common stock by majority shareholder | 90.00%        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage owned of outstanding common stock by majority shareholder
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_PercentageOwnedOfOutstandingCommonStockByMajorityShareholder**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Ivey, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ JAMES G. IVEY        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| James G.  Ivey           |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |
| August 11, 2004          |

 

1

----
### §1857c–10. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §112(b)(1), Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 709

Section, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §119, as added June 22, 1974, Pub. L. 93–319, §3, 88 Stat. 248, related to the authority of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to deal with energy shortages. See section 7413 of this title.

References to section 1857c–10 appearing in section 792 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, shall be construed to refer to section 7413(d) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, see Compliance Orders note set out under section 792 of Title 15.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 7, 1977, see section 406 of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.
#### § 204.50 Purpose.

This subpart establishes procedures for the Commission's referral of past-due legally enforceable debts to the Department of the Treasury's Financial Management Service (FMS) for offset against the income tax refunds of the debtor.

[66 FR 54132, Oct. 26, 2001]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3817 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to improve the energy 

efficiency of electric instantaneous water heaters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2012 

Mr. HIMES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to improve the energy efficiency of electric instantaneous 

water heaters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STANDARDS FOR ELECTRIC INSTANTANEOUS 

4 WATER HEATERS. 

5 (a) DEFINITION OF WATER HEATER.—Section 

6 321(27)(B) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 6291(27)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘12 kilo8 watts’’ and inserting ‘‘25 kilowatts’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3817 IH

1 (b) STANDARDS FOR WATER HEATERS.—Section 

2 325(e) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 6295(e)) is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through 

5 (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; 

6 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(2) ELECTRIC INSTANTANEOUS WATER HEAT9 ERS.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the energy factor 

10 of electric instantaneous water heaters with an input of 

11 25 kilowatts or less, manufactured on or after January 

12 1, 2012, shall be not less than the following: 0.960- (.0003 

13 × Rated Storage Volume in gallons).’’; and 

14 (3) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (5) (as 

15 so redesignated), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1), (2), or 

16 (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1), (3), or (4)’’. 

17 (c) TEST PROCEDURES.—Section 323(b) of the En18 ergy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)) is 

19 amended by adding at the end the following new para20 graph: 

21 ‘‘(19) ELECTRIC INSTANTANEOUS WATER

22 HEATERS.—Not later than January 31, 2012, the 

23 Secretary shall prescribe test procedures under this 

24 section for electric instantaneous water heaters to 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3817 IH

1 which standards are applicable under subsection 

2 (e)(2) of section 325.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §12785. REACH: asset recycling information dissemination

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall make available upon request by any participating jurisdiction a list of eligible properties that are located within the jurisdiction and that are owned or controlled by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to facilitate the purchase, development, or rehabilitation of such properties with assistance made available under this subchapter.

#### (b) Eligible properties

An eligible property under this section shall—

(1) be an unoccupied single-family or multifamily dwelling, such that acquisition and rehabilitation of the dwelling would not result in the displacement of any residents of the dwelling; and

(2) have an appraised value that does not exceed (A) in the case of a 1- to 4-family dwelling, 95 percent of the median purchase price for the area for such dwellings, as determined by the Secretary, or (B) in the case of a dwelling with more than 4 units, the applicable maximum dollar amount limitation under section 1715l(d)(3)(ii) of title 12 for elevator-type structures.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §245, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4119.)