alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.511 Access by former Presidential appointees. ( a ) Former Commission Members appointed by the President may have access to classified information or documents over which the Commission has jurisdiction that they originated, reviewed, signed, or received while in public office, if the Chief Operating Officer determines in writing that access to the information will be consistent with the interest of nation security.
( b ) The person seeking access to classified information must agree in writing: ( 1 ) To be subject to a national agency check;
( 2 ) To protect the classified information in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12356; and
( 3 ) Not to publish or otherwise reveal to unauthorized persons any classified information.
[44 FR 65737, Nov. 15, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 47237, Oct. 25, 1982; 51 FR 5315, Feb. 13, 1986]
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.13f-1 Reporting by institutional investment managers of information with respect to accounts over which they exercise investment discretion. ( a ) ( 1 ) Every institutional investment manager which exercises investment discretion with respect to accounts holding section 13(f) securities, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, having an aggregate fair market value on the last trading day of any month of any calendar year of at least $100,000,000 shall file a report on Form 13F (§ 249.325 of this chapter) with the Commission within 45 days after the last day of such calendar year and within 45 days after the last day of each of the first three calendar quarters of the subsequent calendar year.
( 2 ) An amendment to a Form 13F (§ 249.325 of this chapter) report, other than one reporting only holdings that were not previously reported in a public filing for the same period, must set forth the complete text of the Form 13F. Amendments must be numbered sequentially.
( b ) For the purposes of this rule, “investment descretion” has the meaning set forth in section 3(a)(35) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(35)). An institutional investment manager shall also be deemed to exercise “investment discretion” with respect to all accounts over which any person under its control exercises investment discretion.
( c ) For purposes of this rule “section 13(f) securities” shall mean equity securities of a class described in section 13(d)(1) of the Act that are admitted to trading on a national securities exchange or quoted on the automated quotation system of a registered securities association. In determining what classes of securities are section 13(f) securities, an institutional investment manager may rely on the most recent list of such securities published by the Commission pursuant to section 13(f)(4) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(f)(4)). Only securities of a class on such list shall be counted in determining whether an institutional investment manager must file a report under this rule (§ 240.13f-1(a)) and only those securities shall be reported in such report. Where a person controls the issuer of a class of equity securities which are “section 13(f) securities” as defined in this rule, those securities shall not be deemed to be “section 13(f) securities” with respect to the controlling person, provided that such person does not otherwise exercise investment descretion with respect to accounts with fair market value of at least $100,000,000 within the meaning of paragraph (a) of this section.
(Secs. 3(b), 13(f) and 23 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(b), 78m(f) and 78w))
[43 FR 26705, June 22, 1978, as amended at 44 FR 3034, Jan. 15, 1979; 64 FR 2849, Jan. 19, 1999; 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
§ 37.1307 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates, until it orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Market Oversight or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time, authority to: ( 1 ) Determine whether a particular financial resource under § 37.1302 may be used to satisfy the requirements of § 37.1301;
( 2 ) Review and make changes to the methodology used to compute projected operating costs and wind-down costs under § 37.1304 and the valuation of financial resources under § 37.1305;
( 3 ) Request reports, in addition to those required in § 37.1306, or additional documentation or information under § 37.1306(a), (c), and (e); and
( 4 ) Grant an extension of time to file fiscal quarter reports under § 37.1306(d).
( b ) The Director may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter that has been delegated in this section. Nothing in this section prohibits the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
5325.7703-2 Determination requirements.

(b)(2)(i) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

(b)(2)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5325.77 — ACQUISITIONS IN SUPPORT OF OPERATIONS IN

AFGHANISTAN
Exhibit 10.1  




  


January 12,
2006 



John
A. Krol

Lead Director

Tyco International Ltd.

90 Pitts Bay Road

Pembroke, HM 08 Bermuda 


Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated as of July 25, 2002 by and between Edward D. Breen and Tyco International Ltd. (the
"Company")


Dear
Jack: 


        I
am writing to waive and do hereby waive any and all claims that (1) any change in my position, authority, duties or responsibilities contemplated by and directly resulting form
the consummation of the transactions described in the Form 8-K to be filed by the Company on January 13, 2006 constitutes "Good Reason" under Section 7(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement
(including, for example, any claim that the consummation of such transactions results in a significant diminution in my position, authority, duties or responsibilities because the Company has been
reduced in size) or (2) a transfer of my employment from the Company to an affiliate of the Company in connection with such transactions constitutes a termination of my employment for purposes
of the Employment Agreement, provided that (i) such affiliate expressly assumes and agrees to perform all of the Company's obligations under the Employment Agreement and (ii) I will not
be required to relocate to a principal place of
employment more than 60 miles form my current principal place of employment with the Company. My waiver will not act as a bar for a claim that I may have Good Reason on any other grounds. 



        If
this letter accurately sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof, please so indicate by signing the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning
it to me. 



	

 	
 	

Yours truly,
	

 	
 	

/s/ Edward D. Breen
	

 	
 	

Edward D. Breen
	

UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED	
 	

 
	

/s/ John A. Krol	
 	

 
	

John A. Krol	
 	

 





Dated
this 12th day of January, 2006.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3775 

To provide dollars to the classroom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2012 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide dollars to the classroom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dollars to the Class5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE BY STATES OF FEDERAL 

7 FUNDS PROVIDED FOR ELEMENTARY AND 

8 SECONDARY EDUCATION. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not less 

10 than 95 percent of any Federal funds made available to 

11 a State or State educational agency by the Secretary of 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3775 IH

1 Education for a purpose relating to elementary or sec2 ondary education shall be used for— 

3 (1) academic purposes; and 

4 (2) classroom, or classroom-related, purposes or 

5 at the school level. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.A

                                              <El Paso Logo>
News
For Immediate Release


El Paso Corporation Receives Bank Waivers

HOUSTON,  TEXAS, June 16, 2004-El Paso Corporation (NYSE:EP)
announced  today that it has received additional waivers  on
its  $3-billion revolving credit facility and certain  other
financings.  These waivers provide El Paso with an extension
until  August 15, 2004 to file its 2003 Form 10-K and  first
quarter  2004 Form 10-Q.  The waivers provide for  a  29-day
grace period to file financial statements in the event  that
El  Paso  or any of its significant subsidiaries receives  a
notice  of default on any debt or guarantee of debt that  in
aggregate exceeds $100 million.

El  Paso Corporation provides natural gas and related energy
products  in  a  safe,  efficient, dependable  manner.   The
company  owns  North America's largest natural gas  pipeline
system  and  one  of  North  America's  largest  independent
natural   gas   producers.   For  more  information,   visit
www.elpaso.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
------------------------------------------------------------
This   release   includes  forward-looking  statements   and
projections, made in reliance on the safe harbor  provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The
company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that  the
information  and assumptions on which these  statements  and
projections are based are current, reasonable, and complete.
However, a variety of factors could cause actual results  to
differ  materially from the projections, anticipated results
or  other expectations expressed in this release, including,
without  limitation,  the timing of the  completion  of  the
internal review of the reserve revisions, and the extent and
time  periods involved in any potential restatement of prior
years'   financial   results;  potential   impact   of   any
restatement  of financial results on our access  to  capital
(including borrowings under credit arrangements); changes in
reserves  estimates  based  upon internal  and  third  party
reserve  analyses;  and  other  factors  described  in   the
company's  (and  its  affiliates') Securities  and  Exchange
Commission filings. While the company makes these statements
and  projections in good faith, neither the company nor  its
management  can  guarantee that anticipated  future  results
will  be  achieved. Reference must be made to those  filings
for  additional  important factors that  may  affect  actual
results.  The  company  assumes no  obligation  to  publicly
update  or revise any forward-looking statements made herein
or any other forward-looking statements made by the company,
whether  as  a result of new information, future events,  or
otherwise.

Contacts
Investor and Public Relations
Bruce L. Connery, Vice President
Office:  (713) 420-5855
Fax:     (713) 420-4417

Media Relations
Kim Wallace, Manager
Office:  (713) 420-6330
Fax:     (713) 420-6341
#### State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, v Xerox Corporation, Petitioner.

Determination unanimously annulled, without costs, and appeal to the State Human Rights Appeal Board dismissed. Memorandum: This is a special proceeding brought pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law. Darnell Boyd (complainant) filed a complaint against petitioner with the State Division of Human Rights (Division), asserting discrimination with respect to his employment. On May 25, 1976 a copy of the Division’s determination dismissing the complaint was mailed by certified mail to both complainant and petitioner. The return receipts show that petitioner received its copy on May 26, 1976 but complainant did not receive his copy *1070until June 4, 1976. Complainant filed a notice of appeal to the State Human Rights Appeal Board (Appeal Board) on June 17, 1976. Petitioner’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely was denied by the Appeal Board, and petitioner now seeks to vacate the Appeal Board determination and dismiss the appeal. The Appeal Board has the power to hear appeals from all orders of the Division "provided such appeals are commenced by filing with the board of a notice of appeal within fifteen days after service of such order” (Executive Law, § 297-a, subd 6, par c). If the appeal is not timely filed, the Appeal Board is without jurisdiction to review a determination of the Division *(Matter of Walter v State Div. of Human Rights,*36 AD2d 769; cf. *Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Merante,*35 AD2d 652). Petitioner argues that the time period in which to appeal began to run on the date the Division’s determination was mailed. The Appeal Board found that it did not begin to run until actual receipt of the determination by the complainant. A determination of the Division must be served by "personal service or registered or certified mail, or ordinary, first class mail” (9 NYCRR 465.2). There being no provision in the Executive Law or the rules of practice promulgated thereunder as to when service is effected where it is made by mail, the provisions of CPLR 2103 apply, and service of the Division’s determination upon the complainant was complete when it was deposited for mailing (CPLR 2103, subd [b], par 2; *A. & B. Serv. Sta. v State of New York,*50 AD2d 973; *Matter of Rosenberg v Wickham,*63 Misc 2d 880, affd 36 AD2d 881; *Jackson & Perkins Co. v Rose Fair,*278 App Div 890). The 15-day period prescribed in the Executive Law for the filing of an appeal was extended by three days (CPLR 2103, subd [b], par 2) and the complainant thus had 18 days from the date of mailing in which to appeal. Complainant failed to do so and the Appeal Board is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. While the strict application of CPLR 2103 may well work an injustice in many cases, the remedy lies with the Legislature, not the courts. (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
### §2019. Applicability of Federal Power Act

Every licensee under this chapter who holds a license from the Commission for a utilization or production facility for the generation of commercial electric energy under section 2133 of this title and who transmits such electric energy in interstate commerce or sells it at wholesale in interstate commerce shall be subject to the regulatory provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.].

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §272, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 960; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, which is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791a et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of Title 16 and Tables.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Samuel Sigelman, Respondent, and Travelers Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

The agreement entered into in accordance with the terms of the standard appraisal clause is an agreement to fix the value of the premises and the amount of loss. There is no agreement that when such amount is determined judgment is to be entered thereon. There was no agreement to arbitrate all controversies between the parties, as is authorized by article 84 of the Civil Practice Act; and there is no power in the court to enter judgment upon the appraiser’s award, in the absence of consent of the parties. *772The amendment to section 1448 of the Civil Practice Act by chapter 288 of the Laws of 1941 empowers arbitrators to determine valuations and appraisals when authorized by agreement of the parties but does not require that the agreement in suit be treated as an agreement to arbitrate all the controversies that may exist between the parties under article 84 of the Civil Practice Act. *(Matter of Fletcher,*237 N. Y. 440; *Matter of Amer. Ins. Co.,*208 App. Div. 168.) *Matter of Fitzgerald (Continental Ins. Co.)*(275 App. Div. 453. motion for leave to appeal denied 275 App. Div. 1005) does not seem to hold to the contrary; but if it does, it may not be followed. *(Syracuse Sav. Bank*v. *Yorkshire Ins. Co.,*301 N. Y. 403, 410.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
#### § 39.23 Antitrust considerations.

Unless necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of the Act, a derivatives clearing organization shall not adopt any rule or take any action that results in any unreasonable restraint of trade, or impose any material anticompetitive burden.
§ 1309.2 Definition. *Crib bumper:* ( 1 ) Means any material that is intended to cover the sides of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped in any opening;
( 2 ) Includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and unsupported vinyl bumper guard, and vertical crib slat covers; and
( 3 ) Does not include a non-padded mesh crib liner.
### §1997f. Report to Congress

The Attorney General shall include in the report to Congress on the business of the Department of Justice prepared pursuant to section 522 of title 28—

(1) a statement of the number, variety, and outcome of all actions instituted pursuant to this subchapter including the history of, precise reasons for, and procedures followed in initiation or intervention in each case in which action was commenced;

(2) a detailed explanation of the procedures by which the Department has received, reviewed and evaluated petitions or complaints regarding conditions in institutions;

(3) an analysis of the impact of actions instituted pursuant to this subchapter, including, when feasible, an estimate of the costs incurred by States and other political subdivisions;

(4) a statement of the financial, technical, or other assistance which has been made available from the United States to the State in order to assist in the correction of the conditions which are alleged to have deprived a person of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States; and

(5) the progress made in each Federal institution toward meeting existing promulgated standards for such institutions or constitutionally guaranteed minima.

(Pub. L. 96–247, §8, May 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 353; Pub. L. 97–256, title II, §201(b), Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 817; Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VIII, §803(e)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–73; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–134 substituted "the report" for "his report" in introductory provisions .

1982—Pub. L. 97–256 substituted "Attorney General" for "Attorney".
#### Ferdinand A. Straus, Appellant, v. Kenneth H. Granger, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 778.]
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ayaz Kassam, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Ayaz
Kassam
 Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 
 Date: 
March 17, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marco Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard Storm, Jr.                     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Richard Storm, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
#### § 269.1 Form T-1, for statement of eligibility and qualification for corporate trustees.

This form shall be filed pursuant to Rule 5a-1(a) (§ 260.5a-1(a) of this chapter) for statements of eligibility and qualification of corporations designated to act as trustees under thrust indentures to be qualified pursuant to section 305 or 307 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form T-1, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
§ 229.1305 (Item 1305) Internal controls disclosure. ( a ) Describe the internal controls that the registrant uses in its exploration and mineral resource and reserve estimation efforts. This disclosure should include quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA) programs, verification of analytical procedures, and a discussion of comprehensive risk inherent in the estimation.
( b ) A registrant must provide the internal controls disclosure required by this section whether it is providing the disclosure under § 229.1303, § 229.1304, or under both sections.
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.1601 Form SBSE-W, for withdrawal from registration as a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant or to amend such an application for registration.

This form shall be used to withdraw from registration as a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant, pursuant to Section 15F(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-10(b)).

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form SBSE-W, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
§ 242.827 Core Principle 10—Antitrust considerations. Unless necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of the Act, the security-based swap execution facility shall not: ( a ) Adopt any rules or take any actions that result in any unreasonable restraint of trade; or
( b ) Impose any material anticompetitive burden on trading or clearing.