alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. ATKINS

No. 9A94-2

Case below: Buncomb County Superior Corut

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Buncombe County denied 15 January 1997.
### §17286. Geothermal assessment, exploration information, and priority activities

#### (a) In general

Not later than January 1, 2012, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Geological Survey, shall—

(1) complete a comprehensive nationwide geothermal resource assessment that examines the full range of geothermal resources in the United States; and

(2) submit to the the 1 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report describing the results of the assessment.

#### (b) Periodic updates

At least once every 10 years, the Secretary shall update the national assessment required under this section to support public and private sector decisionmaking.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this section—

(1) $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012; and

(2) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2022.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VIII, §807, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.

1 So in original.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Commercial Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
land that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request. Dated: May 4, 2005 /s/ Harry BrillHarry BrillChief Financial Officer
### §16377. Regulations

The Secretary may promulgate such regulations as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to carry out the CIFIA program.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §999G, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, §40304(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1000.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 16377, Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §999G, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 923, defined terms for former part J, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title III, §301(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1181.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
### §5501. Commitment actions

The Secretary may incur necessary court costs and other expenses incident to proceedings for the commitment of mentally incompetent veterans to a Department hospital or domiciliary when necessary for treatment or domiciliary purposes.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1232, §3201; renumbered §5501, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), (b)(1), (2)(E), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, 405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3201 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), substituted "Department" for "Veterans' Administration".
Subpart 3417.1—Multiyear Contracting

Parent topic: PART 3417—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

3417.104 General.

(b) The Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) is the agency head for the purposes of FAR

17.104(b).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2016

s1130 

# Order

Clerk December 7, 2016

153956

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153956

COA: 332331

Wayne CC: 13

- 010968

- FH

MARIO SHANTEZ GOSS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the probation revocation and the sentence of the

Wayne Circuit Court and we REMAND this case to the trial court for a probation

revocation hearing and possible resentencing. See MCL 771.4. Without holding a

probation violation hearing as required by MCR 6.445(E), the trial court found that the

defendant had violated the terms of his probation. And, while the court did not state the

grounds for such a finding, it was made immediately after having sentenced the defendant

for his felony murder conviction and associated charges in an unrelated case. However,

the murder was committed more than eight months before the defend ant was placed on

probation for the crime charged in this case. Because MCL 771.3(1)(a) provides that

“[d]uring the term of his or her probation, the probationer shall not violate any criminal

law of this state . . . ,” the defendant could not have violat ed the terms of his probation for

having committed an act amounting to a violation of a criminal law that preceded the

imposition of the order of probation issued in this case.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006              /s/ Wayne A. Pratt   Wayne A. Pratt   Chief Financial Officer
#### § 270.24b-2 Filing copies of sales literature.

Copies of material filed with the Commission for the sole purpose of complying with section 24(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-24(b)) either shall be accompanied by a letter of transmittal which makes appropriate references to said section or shall make such appropriate reference on the face of the material.

[70 FR 43570, July 27, 2005]
EXHIBIT 23(a)





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this 
Registration Statement of The Clorox Company on Form S-8
of our report dated August 8, 1996, incorporated by
reference in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 1996.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Oakland, California
November 26, 1996
### §2000c–7. Liability of United States for costs

In any action or proceeding under this subchapter the United States shall be liable for costs the same as a private person.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title IV, §408, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 249.)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00126-CV

Albert F. Peralta, Appellant

v.

PS LPT Properties Investors, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-10-009518, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In February 2002, Appellant Albert F. Peralta leased storage space from appellee’s

predecessor. In July 2010, appellee served Peralta with a notice of eviction. When Peralta did not

vacate as instructed, appellee filed a petition for eviction in the justice of the peace court seeking a

judgment that appellee was entitled to possession of the property. Peralta filed pro se answers that

seemed to assert that conditions at the storage facility were unsatisfactory and that appellee had not

served him at his correct address. After a jury trial, the justice court signed a judgment granting

possession to appellee and denying any other relief, including attorney’s fees or court costs. Peralta

appealed to the county court at law, complaining about appellee’s method of service and stating that

he was not using the premises for living quarters and did not owe any rent. Following a bench trial,

the court signed a final judgment of eviction in appellee’s favor, granting appellee possession of the
premises. Peralta appealed, and appellee filed a motion to dismiss asserting that we lack jurisdiction

under the property code. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007 (West 2000). We agree.

Under the property code, a county court’s final judgment of eviction “may not be

appealed on the issue of possession” unless the premises are being used solely for residential

purposes. Id. Peralta’s contract expressly states that the space was to be used for storage of personal

property and not for other purposes, including habitation, and in his court filings, Peralta stated that

he only used the space for storage purposes. The judgment signed bythe county court addresses only

who is entitled to possession of the premises, and there is no basis in the record to believe that the

property might have been used as a residence. On this record, there are no issues that would allow

this Court to exercise jurisdiction over the proceeding. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See id.; Roberts v. Leedy, No. 13-08-00604-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2855, at *8-9

(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 14, 2011, no pet.); Salvagio v. Capital Farm Credit, FCLA,

No. 03-10-00502-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 9042, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 12, 2010, no

pet.); Schuring v. Kingwood Horsemen’s Ass’n, No. 01-08-00760-CV, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 5752,

at *3-4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 23, 2009, pet. dism’d).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 30, 2011

2
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.17Ac2-1 Application for registration of transfer agents. ( a ) An application for registration, pursuant to section 17A(c) of the Act, of a transfer agent for which the Commission is the appropriate regulatory agency, as defined in section 3(a)(34)(B) of the Act, shall be filed with the Commission on Form TA-1, in accordance with the instructions contained therein and shall become effective on the thirtieth day following the date on which the application is filed, unless the Commission takes affirmative action to accelerate, deny or postpone such registration in accord- ance with the provisions of section 17A(c) of the Act.
( b ) The filing of any amendment to an application for registration as a transfer agent pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, which registration has not become effective, shall postpone the effective date of the registration until the thirtieth day following the date on which the amendment is filed, unless the Commission takes affirmative action to accelerate, deny or postpone the registration in accord- ance with the provisions of section 17A(c) of the Act.
( c ) If any of the information reported on Form TA-1 (§ 249b.100 of this chapter) becomes inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete, the registrant shall correct the information by filing an amendment within sixty days following the date on which the information becomes inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete.
( d ) Every registration and amendment filed pursuant to this section shall be filed with the Commission electronically in the Commission's EDGAR system. Transfer agents should refer to Form TA-1 and the instructions to the form (§ 249b.100 of this chapter) and to the EDGAR Filer Manual (§ 232.301 of this chapter) for the technical requirements and instructions for electronic filing. Transfer agents that have previously filed a Form TA-1 with the Commission must refile the information on their Form TA-1, as amended, in electronic format in EDGAR as an amended Form TA-1.
( e ) Every registration and amendment filed pursuant to this section shall constitute a “report” or “application” within the meaning of sections 17, 17A(c), and 32(a) of the Act.
[40 FR 51184, Nov. 4, 1975, as amended at 51 FR 12127, Apr. 9, 1986; 71 FR 74708, Dec. 12, 2006]
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15b1-2 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3 appear at 89 FR 71806, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 3.57 Proceedings under section 8a(2)(E) of the Act.

The Commission will not initiate a proceeding under section 8a(2)(E) of the Act, if *respondeat superior* is the sole basis upon which the registrant may be found subject to a statutory disqualification.
#### In the Matter of J. Roland Sala, a City Magistrate of the City of New York.

Present — Cars-well, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 665.]
§ 12.15 Notification of complaint. ( a ) *Forwarding of complaint to registrant.* If, in the opinion of the Director of the Office of Proceedings, the facts set forth in a complaint warrant such action as to any of the registrants, a copy of the complaint, together with any attachments thereto, shall be forwarded by serving by registered mail or certified mail any such registrant named therein at an address previously designated with the Commission by the registrant for receipt of reparation complaints, as provided in Commission Regulation 17 CFR 3.30, or, if no such designation has been filed with the Commission, at such address as will accomplish actual notice to the respondent. Should the Director determine to forward the complaint, the complainant shall be notified of this determination at the time the complaint is forwarded.
( b ) *Determination not to forward complaint.* The Director may, in their discretion, refuse to forward a complaint as to a particular respondent if it appears that the matters alleged therein are not cognizable in reparations, or that grounds exist pursuant to § 12.24(c) or (d) for refusing to forward the complaint. If the Director of the Office of Proceedings should determine not to forward the complaint to all registrants named in the complaint in accordance with this section, no proceeding shall be held thereon and the complainant shall be notified to that effect. If the Director determines to forward the complaint as to less than all of the registrants, the complainant shall be so notified. A termination of the complaint as to any registrant shall be regarded by the Commission as without prejudice to the right of the complainant to seek such alternative forms of relief as may be available.
[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984, as amended at 86 FR 64353, Nov. 18, 2021]
#### § 232.310 Marking changed material.

Provisions requiring the marking of changed materials are satisfied in ASCII and HTML documents by inserting the tag <R>before and the tag </R>following a paragraph containing changed material. HTML documents may be marked to show changed materials within paragraphs. Financial statements and notes thereto need not be marked for changed material.

[64 FR 27896, May 21, 1999]
525.1070 Purchases Using Department of

Defense (DoD) Appropriated Funds.

(a) The Berry Amendment, 10 U.S.C. 4862, applies domestic-source requirements to certain food,

clothing, fabrics, specialty metals, and hand or measuring tools when purchased with DoD

appropriated funds. The Berry Amendment, as applicable to purchases using DoD appropriated

funds, is implemented at DFARS Subpart 225.70 and in clauses prescribed there.

(b) GSA acquisition personnel are responsible for reviewing requests for purchases using DoD

appropriated funds to ensure that all special funding and procurement requirements, e.g., Berry

Amendment applicability, have been disclosed to GSA.

Parent topic: Subpart 525.10 - Additional Foreign Acquisition Regulations
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Across America Real Estate Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Alexander V. Lagerborg, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


MAY 11, 2006                                         /s/ Alexander V. Lagerborg
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Alexander V. Lagerborg
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
### §2053. Research for others; charges

In this section, with respect to international research projects, the term "private facilities or laboratories" means facilities or laboratories located in the United States. Where the Commission finds private facilities or laboratories are inadequate for the purpose, it is authorized to conduct for other persons, through its own facilities, such of those activities and studies of the types specified in section 2051 of this title as it deems appropriate to the development of energy. To the extent the Commission determines that private facilities or laboratories are inadequate for the purpose, and that the Commission's facilities, or scientific or technical resources have the potential of lending significant assistance to other persons in the fields of protection of public health and safety, the Commission may also assist other persons in these fields by conducting for such persons, through the Commission's own facilities, research and development or training activities and studies. The Commission is authorized to determine and make such charges as in its discretion may be desirable for the conduct of the activities and studies referred to in this section.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §33, as added Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 928; amended Pub. L. 90–190, §7, Dec. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 577; Pub. L. 92–84, title II, §201(b), Aug. 11, 1971, 85 Stat. 307; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944; Pub. L. 115–246, title III, §307(g), formerly §307(f), Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3149, renumbered §307(g), Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title II, §2008(a)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2474.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–246 inserted "In this section, with respect to international research projects, the term 'private facilities or laboratories' means facilities or laboratories located in the United States." before "Where the Commission".

1971—Pub. L. 92–84 substituted provisions authorizing the Commission to conduct research for other persons for the development of energy, for provisions authorizing the Commission to conduct research for other persons for the development of atomic energy.

1967—Pub. L. 90–190 inserted provision which authorized the Commission, to the extent the Commission made certain determinations, to assist other persons on the fields of protection of public health and safety by conducting for such persons, through the facilities of the Commission, research and development or training activities and studies, and substituted "the activities and studies referred to in this section" for "such activities and studies".