alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From : Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US @EPA

Sent : 05/15/2012 08:26 AM

To : "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

Cc : Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte

Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject : Bounding Analysis for PC

Hello Cortney

Please find attached the bounding analysis that represents limits if anything remotely considered waste,

was removed from the MACT analysis.

THANKS.

(See attached file: Bounding analysis(2)051412.docx)

(See attached file: Bounding analysis Attachment_A(2)051412.xlsx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Min erals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825
#### § 232.312 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26720]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 29, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before January 5, 
2005 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: 1506-0013.
    Form Number: FinCEN 104 (Formerly Customs Form 4789).
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Registration of Money Services Business, 31 CFR 103.41.
    Description: Money services businesses file Form 107 to register 
with the Department of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5330 and 31 
CFR 103.41. The information on the form is used by criminal 
investigators, and taxation and regulatory enforcement authorities, 
during the course of investigations involving financial crimes.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 17,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 45 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (as required).
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 17,600 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Steve Rudzinski, (703) 905-3845, Financial 
Crimes Enforcement Network, 2070 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 200, Vienna, 
VA 22182.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26720 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
```
### §§2297, 2297a. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3116(a)(1), Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–349

Section 2297, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1201, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2923, defined terms for purposes of this division.

Section 2297a, act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title II, §1202, as added Oct. 24, 1992, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §901, 106 Stat. 2924, related to purposes of United States Enrichment Corporation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3116(a)(1), Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–349, provided that: "Chapters 22 through 26 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2297–2297e–7) are repealed as of the privatization date [July 28, 1998, see 42 U.S.C. 2297h(9) for definition of privatization date as date on which 100 percent of ownership of United States Enrichment Corporation has been transferred to private investors]."

#### Severability

Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §904, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2946, provided that: "If any provision of this title [see Tables for classification], or the amendments made by this title, or the application of any provision to any entity, person, or circumstance, is for any reason adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remainder of this title, and the amendments made by this title, or its application shall not be affected."

#### References to United States Enrichment Corporation

Pub. L. 104–134, title III, §3116(e), Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–350, provided that: "Following the privatization date [July 28, 1998, see Effective Date of Repeal note above], all references in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.] to the United States Enrichment Corporation shall be deemed to be references to the private corporation."
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3651 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3651

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to exempt certain creditors from the 
 escrow account requirement for higher-priced mortgage loans, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2011

  Mr. Barrow introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Truth in Lending Act to exempt certain creditors from the 
 escrow account requirement for higher-priced mortgage loans, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CREDITORS.

    (a) In General.--Section 129D of the Truth in Lending Act, as added 
by section 1461 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(k) Exemption for Certain Creditors.--A creditor with less than 
$1,000,000,000 in assets shall be exempt from--
            ``(1) the requirements of subsection (a) with respect to a 
        consumer credit transaction secured by a first lien on the 
        consumer's principal dwelling with an annual percentage rate 
        that exceeds the average prime offer rate for a comparable 
        transaction as of the date the interest rate is set by 1.5 or 
        more percentage points; and
            ``(2) any other provision of this Act, to the extent such 
        provision requires the creditor to establish an escrow or 
        impound account described under subsection (a) with respect to 
        a consumer credit transaction described under paragraph (1).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Notwithstanding the date on which the other 
provisions of section 129D of the Truth in Lending Act take effect, 
section 129D(k) of the Truth in Lending Act, as added by this Act, 
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles H. Nelson, Appellant, v. Eleanor M. Nelson, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3948 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 182. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 182. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID RED 182. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acid Red 182, (Cobaltate(1-), 

bis[4-(hydroxy-kO)-3-[2-[2- 

(hydroxy-kO)-1- 

naphthalenyl]diazenylkN1]benzenesulfonamidato(2- 

)]-, sodium (1:1)) (CAS No. 

58302–43–5) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.12.45) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3948 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### City of Chicago, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. H. Allen, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 20,006.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the April term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 26, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Prosecution by the city of Chicago against E. H. Allen in which defendant was charged with disorderly conduct in violation of a city ordinance. Upon a trial by the court without a jury defendant was acquitted. To reverse the judgment, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.

*190Abstract of the Decision.

1. Disorderly conduct, § *1*
      ***
      *—when finding of not guilty sustained by evidence.*On a prosecution for disorderly conduct in violation of a city ordinance, a finding of not guilty *held*not contrary to the evidence where the weight thereof depended mainly upon the credibility of witnesses.

2. Appeal and error, § *472*—when limiting number of witnesses not preserved for review.*Action of court in limiting the number of witnesses, *held*not preserved for review, where no objection was taken to the court’s suggestion to that effect, but on the contrary it appeared that counsel appeared to have acquiesced in it.

3. Appeal and error, § *1512*—when action of court in taking judicial notice of character of place witness worked not reversible.*In a prosecution for disorderly conduct, the fact that the court improperly took judicial notice of the bad character of a place in which one of the witnesses at one time worked, *held*not reversible error, where the material fact in controversy was as to who were the aggressors in the fight.

. The same charge was also preferred and prosecuted at the same time against one Charles E. Selleck, growing out of the same occurrence and with the same result. The evidence and questions being the same, both cases were consolidated in the Appellate Court for hearing. For the decision of the court on the writ of error sued out by Charles E. Selleck, see *City of Chicago v. Selleck,*p. 191, *post.*

William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for plaintiff in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel.

Francis E. Croarkin, for defendant in error; Francis W. Walker, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4011 

To modify certain provisions of law relating to torture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mr. NADLER (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. 

CAPUANO, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FILNER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

HOLT, Mr. HONDA, Mr. KUCINICH, Mrs. MALONEY, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. ROTHMAN of 

New Jersey, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and 

in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To modify certain provisions of law relating to torture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Anti-Torture 

5 Act of 2012’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4011 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR INTERROGATION TECH2 NIQUES APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS 

3 UNDER CONTROL OR CUSTODY OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. 

5 Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of each of section 1002 

6 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title X of Public 

7 Law 109–148; 10 U.S.C. 801 note; 119 Stat. 2739) and 

8 section 1402 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title 

9 XIV of Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 801 note; 119 

10 Stat. 3475) are amended to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No person in the custody or 

12 under the effective control of the United States shall be 

13 subject to any treatment or technique of interrogation not 

14 authorized by and listed in the United States Army Field 

15 Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations. 

16 ‘‘(b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

17 with respect to any person in the custody or under the 

18 effective control of the United States pursuant to a crimi19 nal law or immigration law of the United States. 

20 ‘‘(c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 

21 be construed to affect the rights under the United States 

22 Constitution of any person in the custody or under the 

23 physical jurisdiction of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 201.530 Initial decision on permanent order: Timing for submitting proposed findings and preparation of decision. Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission or hearing officer, if a temporary cease-and-desist order or suspension of registration order is in effect, the following time limits shall apply to preparation of an initial decision as to whether such order should be made permanent: ( a ) Proposed findings and conclusions and briefs in support thereof shall be filed 30 days after the close of the hearing;
( b ) The record in the proceedings shall be served by the Secretary upon the hearing officer three days after the date for the filing of the last brief called for by the hearing officer; and
( c ) The initial decision shall be filed with the Secretary at the earliest possible time, but in no event more than 30 days after service of the record, unless the hearing officer, by order, shall extend the time for good cause shown for a period not to exceed 30 days.
<PAGE>
                                                                       Ex. 10.37

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                   SHAREHOLDERS' VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: F Room 1003,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDER"), and HEFEI FUKESI ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD. limited
liability company (registered address: Room B2401, Gujin Baihua Building, 156
Shouchun Rd., Hefei) (hereinafter the "PARTICIPATED TARGET COMPANY"), as
independent party, hereby agree to participate in the Shareholders' Voting
Rights Proxy Agreement among FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.,
SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD. and other relevant parties
(hereinafter, "PROXY AGREEMENT") dated March 28 2005. Participating Shareholder
and Participated Target Company agree to entrust the Trustees designated by
Focus Media Technology to exercise the voting rights in Participating Target
Company in respect of 90% of the equity interest in the registered capital of
Participating Target Company held by the Participating Shareholder as of the
date of the Acknowledgement Letter, on behalf of Participating Shareholder.

Once this Acknowledgement Letter is executed by the Participating Shareholder
and Participating Target Company, Participating Shareholder and Participated
Target Company shall be deemed to have made the same undertakings and warranties
with those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the Proxy Agreement,
agreed to respectively perform the obligations of the Shareholders and Target
Companies stipulated in the Proxy Agreement, and acknowledged the rights and
obligations of the Parties under the Proxy Agreement.

<PAGE>

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


HEFEI FUKESI ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joanne R. Viohl, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 183]

*648Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 18, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment as an assistant vice-president for a bank, managing a customer service call center, in September 2004 without good cause. The record establishes that in October 2001, claimant, in addition to managing the customer service call center, was assigned the task of converting the information from newly acquired banks into the employer’s system. Due to an increased number of calls at the call center in connection with the bank acquisitions as well as a shortage in staff in the call center due to extended leaves of absence, claimant’s work load increased. When she complained to the employer, she was authorized to hire an additional employee. However, when claimant’s additional requests for more help were not answered, she resigned. Inasmuch as dissatisfaction with one’s employment generally does not constitute good cause for resigning *(see Matter of Maine [Commissioner of Labor],*282 AD2d 854 [2001]) and, here, claimant accepted the increased work load for nearly three years *(see Matter of Viruet [Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 738 [2001]; *see generally Matter of Guarino [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AT)2d 514 [2003]), we decline to disturb the Board’s decision, even though there is evidence in the record to support a contrary conclusion. Furthermore, to the extent that claimant maintained that the job stress adversely effected her health, there was no evidence that she was medically advised to leave *(see Matter of Carlson [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AD2d 582, 583 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
### §1973f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973f was editorially reclassified as section 10305 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
| **LEASES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS (Narrative) (Details)** | 3 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Leases [Abstract]**                                  |           |
| Remaining lease terms                                  | 12 years       |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Lessee, Remaining Lease Term
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**clx_LesseeRemainingLeaseTerm**Namespace Prefix:**clx_**Data Type:**xbrli:durationItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_LeasesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The Purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.

All of these meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    These closed proposal review meeting will no longer be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names                           ( print page 70290)                        of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web-site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​home/​pubinfo/​advisory.htm*. This information may also be requested by telephoning (703) 292-8182.                

Dated: November 29, 2004.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-26582 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M