alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[115th Congress Public Law 347]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5054]]

Public Law 115-347
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   180 McCormick Road in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Captain 
   Humayun Khan Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 3184]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HUMAYUN KHAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 180 McCormick Road in Charlottesville, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Humayun Khan Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Humayun Khan Post Office''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3184:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Nov. 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §1594b. Maintenance and operation of housing; use of quarters; payment of principal, interest, and other obligations

The Secretary of Defense or his designee is authorized to maintain and operate any housing acquired under this title and assign quarters therein to military and civilian personnel and their dependents. Appropriations for quarters allowances or appropriate allotments, and rental charges to civilian personnel, may be utilized by the military department concerned for the payment of principal, interest, and other obligations, except those of maintenance and operation, of the mortgagor corporation with respect to such housing projects. Such payments shall not exceed an average of $90 a month per housing unit and total payments for all housing so acquired shall not exceed $21,000,000 per month: Provided, That, in case of the United States Coast Guard, total payments for all housing so acquired shall not exceed $90,000 per month.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title IV, §405, 69 Stat. 652; Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1029, title V, §508, 70 Stat. 1110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, means title IV of act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, 69 Stat. 646, as amended, which enacted sections 1594 and 1594a, 1594b to 1594f of this title, amended sections 1720, 1748, and 1748a to 1748g of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 1748 of Title 12. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 7, 1956, substituted "$21,000,000" for "$9,000,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### § 180.2 Prohibition on price manipulation.

It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to manipulate or attempt to manipulate the price of any swap, or of any commodity in interstate commerce, or for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any registered entity.
#### Juliet K. Baraban, Appellant, v. Jay H. Tichenor et al., Respondents. Jay H. Tichenor et al., Respondents, v. Maxwell C. Baraban et al., Defendants, and Juliet K. Baraban, Appellant.

Appeal by Juliet K. Baraban from an order which denied her motion with respect to the answer of defendants Jay H. Tichenor and Woodside Homes, Inc. Order modified by striking out of the ordering paragraph the words *“*in all things denied ” and by substituting in lieu thereof provisions that the motion be granted to the extent that the firsf *976defense contained in the answer be struck out and that the portion of the answer, which is labeled as a defense and counterclaim against appellant and as a complaint against appellant and new parties sought to be brought into the action, be struck out as a defense and dismissed as a counterclaim and complaint, and that the motion otherwise be denied. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs, and with leave to respondents to serve an amended answer within ten days after the entry of the order hereon, if they are so advised. The wrongs alleged in appellant’s complaint are fraudulent representations in connection with the entering into a contract between appellant and respondents, diversion of funds and failure to deliver to her shares of the capital stock of respondent Woodside. The first defense pleads that respondents performed the contract and tendered shares of stock to appellant. Any issue as to performance of the contract does not avoid the claim based on fraud and, so far as the claims of diversion of funds and failure to deliver shares of stock are concerned, is raised by denials of allegations of the complaint. The second affirmative part of the answer pleads fraud in inducing respondent Woodside to hire two of the proposed new parties and certain wrongdoing by those parties during the course of their employment by said respondent, and that as a result of these alleged wrongs and certain disclosures concerning said new parties the credit of respondent Woodside “was impaired” and another person, not a party to the action, withdrew his funds from the transaction in which all were concerned. The allegations that the credit of respondent Woodside “was impaired” and that damage resulted, as they appear in this pleading are conclusions and are not statements of ultimate facts. Assuming, arguendo, that the causes set forth therein are properly pleaded, they still would constitute claims in behalf only of respondent Woodside, the assertion that Tiehenor “lost” moneys “as a result ” being a mere conclusion. As a defense it does not avoid the liability claimed in appellant’s complaint. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 249](/current/title-17/part-249?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at [57 FR 36501](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-36501), Aug. 13, 1992, and [57 FR 47409](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-47409), Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.330 Form N-CEN, annual report of registered investment companies.

This form shall be used by registered unit investment trusts and small business investment companies for annual reports to be filed pursuant to [§ 270.30a-1 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-16/title-17/section-270.30a-1) in satisfaction of the requirement of section 30(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ([15 U.S.C. 80a-29(a)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/80a-29)) that every registered investment company must file annually with the Commission such information, documents, and reports as investment companies having securities registered on a national securities exchange are required to file annually pursuant to section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ([15 U.S.C. 78m(a)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/15/78m)) and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Note:

The text of Form N-CEN will not appear in the *Code of Federal Regulations.*

[[81 FR 82020](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-82020), Nov. 18, 2016]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form N-CEN, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *[www.govinfo.gov](http://www.govinfo.gov).*
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15Fb6-1 [Reserved]
Subpart 3447.7—Foreign Travel

Parent topic: PART 3447—TRANSPORTATION

3447.701 Foreign travel clause.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.247–70 (Foreign travel) in all solicitations and

resultant cost-reimbursement contracts where foreign travel is contemplated.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Seymour Siskind, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                                                                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|August 9, 2007                                                                                  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
5341.204 GSA Area-wide Contracts

(c)(1)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5341.2 – ACQUIRING UTILITY SERVICES
```

[115th Congress Public Law 416]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5436]]

Public Law 115-416
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide access to and manage the distribution of excess or surplus 
property to veteran-owned small businesses. <<NOTE: Jan. 3, 2019 -  [S. 
                                2679]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Veterans Small 
Business Enhancement Act of 2018. 15 USC 631 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Small Business Enhancement 
Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. ACCESS TO SURPLUS PROPERTY FOR VETERAN-OWNED SMALL 
                    BUSINESSES.

    Section 32 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657b) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Access to Surplus Property for Veteran-owned Small 
Businesses.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
                    ``(A) the term `foreign excess property' has the 
                meaning given the term in section 102 of title 40, 
                United States Code; and
                    ``(B) the term `state agency' has the meaning given 
                the term, including the roles and responsibilities 
                assigned, in section 549 of title 40, United States 
                Code.
            ``(2) <<NOTE: Coordination.>>  Requirement.--The 
        Administrator, in coordination with the Administrator of General 
        Services, shall provide access to and manage the distribution of 
        surplus property, and foreign excess property returned to a 
        State for handling as surplus property, owned by the United 
        States under chapter 7 of title 40, United States Code, to small 
        business concerns owned and controlled by veterans (as verified 
        by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 8127 of title 
        38, United States Code) pursuant to a memorandum of agreement 
        between the Administrator, the Administrator of General 
        Services, and the head

[[Page 132 STAT. 5437]]

        of the applicable state agency for surplus properties and in 
        accordance with section 549 of title 40, United States Code.''.

    Approved January 3, 2019.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2679:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115-414 (Comm. on Small Business and 
Entrepreneurship).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 229.1401 (Item 1401) General instructions. ( a ) A bank, bank holding company, savings and loan association, or savings and loan holding company (“bank and savings and loan registrants”) must provide the disclosure required by this subpart.
( b ) When the term “reported period” is used in this subpart, it refers to each of the periods described below: ( 1 ) Each annual period required by 17 CFR part 210 (“Regulation S-X”) or 17 CFR 239.90 (“Form 1-A”); and—
( 2 ) Any additional interim period subsequent to the most recent fiscal year end if a material change in the information or the trend evidenced thereby has occurred.
( c ) In this subpart, registrants are required to use daily averages unless otherwise indicated. Registrants may use weekly or month-end averages where the collection of data on a daily average basis would involve unwarranted or undue burden or expense; provided that such averages are representative of the registrant's operations. Registrants must disclose the basis used for presenting averages.
( d ) In various provisions throughout this subpart, registrants are required to disclose information relating to certain foreign financial activities. For purposes of this subpart, a registrant only is required to present this information if the registrant meets the threshold to make separate disclosures concerning its foreign activities in its consolidated financial statements pursuant to the test set forth in § 210.9-05 of Regulation S-X.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas H. Grawe, Deceased. Cher C. Lazenby, Respondent; Jon Thomas Grawe, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas H. Grawe, Deceased, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 683]

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, S.), entered October 25, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act § 1420. The order determined that petitioner is the rightful beneficiary of certain property devised in the last will and testament of decedent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1420 seeking an order determining that she is the rightful beneficiary of the property devised in article fourth of the last will and testament of Thomas H. Grawe (decedent). By that article, decedent devised and bequeathed his residence and its contents to “that woman, if there be one, with whom I am cohabiting in said residence at the time of my death,” provided that the executor of decedent’s estate “conclude[d] to his satisfaction” that, inter alia, decedent and “said woman were cohabiting voluntarily . . . [as] the consequence of an intimate, personal relationship” at the time of decedent’s death. The executor asserted in opposition to the relief sought that, as he had previously determined, petitioner does not meet the criteria set forth in article fourth. The Surrogate properly concluded that the executor does not possess unlimited discretion to make that determination. Rather, the exercise of discretion by the executor is limited by his absolute duty of impartiality to the beneficiaries of the estate *(see Matter of Muller,*24 NY2d 336, 341, *amended on other grounds*24 NY2d 1029 [1969]), and the executor’s exercise of discretion is subject to judicial review *(see*
      *1310
      *Matter of Leopold,*259 NY 274, 277). The evidence at the hearing supports the Surrogate’s conclusion that petitioner met the criteria set forth in article fourth of the will, “given their ordinary and natural meaning,” and that she is thus the rightful beneficiary of the property devised in that article *(Matter of Gustafson,*74 NY2d 448, 451 [1989]). The executor’s remaining contention is raised for the first time on appeal and therefore is not preserved for our review *(see C-Kitchen Assoc., Inc. v Travelers Ins. Co.,*11 AD3d 961, 962 [2004]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3935 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3935

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Acid Blue 221.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Acid Blue 221.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 221.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.95 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Amended  periodic  report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") of Life USA, Inc. (the "Company")
I, Kelly Kendall, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: August 10, 2004

/s/Kelly Kendall
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Kendall, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


     This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Northern District of Iowa.



## United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2414

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa Shawn Allen Hungate, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 9, 1997 Filed: December 24, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Defendant Shawn Allen Hungate appeals from a fina l judgment entered in the UnitedStates District Court for 1 the Northern District of Iowa sentencing him to 94 months imprisonment, three years supervised release, and special assessments totaling-2-

$150, upon a guilty plea to one count of unlawfu l poss ession of firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C . §§ 922( g)(8) and 924(a)(2), and two counts of mailin g threa tening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C . § 876. Defendant has a history of physically abusing his ex-w ife and child, including assaults on his ex-wif e during her pregnancy. In February of 1995, a state court magi strate judge ordered defendant to refrain from an y contact wi th his ex-wife and child, including contact by mail or telephone. Defendant was also then prohibite d frompossessing or receiving a firearm. Thereafter , defe ndant, on one occasion, unlawfully purchased an d possess ed a firearm which he then used to shoot himsel f in the sho ulder prior to entering his ex-wife’s place of work an d, on two separate occasions, wrote one lette r addre ssed to his 14-month-old daughter threatening t o harm or kill her upon being released from jai l, and wrote anot her letter to his ex-wife’s sister, threatening t o harm or ki ll his ex-wife and his daughter, among others.

For reversal, defendant argues that the distric t cour t erred in: (1) applying the specific offens e characteristic in U.S.S.G. § 2A6.1(b) because his § 87 6 offe nses involved conduct evidencing an intent to carr y out his threats; (2) failing to group his offense s toge ther for purposes of the multi-count rules i n U.S.S.G . § 3D1.1; and (3) departing upward by 21 month s pur suant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 on the ground that th e-3-

guidelines fail to adequately take into consi deration the danger he poses to his ex-wife and child. Jurisdiction in the district court was proper base d upon 18 U.S.C. § 3231. Jurisdiction in this court i s proper based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291.-4-

Upon c areful review of the briefs on appeal and th e record in this case, including the sentencing transcript, we hold that the relevant factual findings of th e district c ourt are not clearly erroneous, that no errors of law have occurred, and that further discussion i s unne cessary. Accordingly, the judgment of the distric t court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
Accepted: RTR Bins 1 and 2 -- EPA/OMB Meeting - 9/14

Tue 09/14/2010 9:30 AM - 11:30 

AM

Location: Conference Line -- (919) 541-4248

RTP Conf Rm -- D201

"Higgins, Cortney" has accepted this meeting invitation

Required:

Ann Johnson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Anne Pope/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brenda 

Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, chiggins@OMB.eop.gov, Dave Guinnup/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Elaine Manning/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eric Ginsburg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan