alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.222 Prehearing submissions and disclosures. ( a ) *Submissions generally.* The hearing officer, on his or her own motion, or at the request of a party or other participant, may order any party, including the interested division, to furnish such information as deemed appropriate, including any or all of the following: ( 1 ) An outline or narrative summary of its case or defense;
( 2 ) The legal theories upon which it will rely;
( 3 ) Copies and a list of documents that it intends to introduce at the hearing; and
( 4 ) A list of witnesses who will testify on its behalf, including the witnesses' names, occupations, addresses and a brief summary of their expected testimony.
( b ) *Expert witnesses* — ( 1 ) *Information to be supplied; reports.* Each party who intends to call an expert witness shall submit, in addition to the information required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section, a statement of the expert's qualifications, a listing of other proceedings in which the expert has given expert testimony during the previous four years, and a list of publications authored or co-authored by the expert in the previous ten years. Additionally, if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case or one whose duties as the party's employee regularly involve giving expert testimony, then the party must include in the disclosure a written report—prepared and signed by the witness. The report must contain: ( i ) A complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;
( ii ) The facts or data considered by the witness in forming them;
( iii ) Any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them; and
( iv ) A statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.
( 2 ) *Drafts and communications protected.* ( i ) Drafts of any report or other disclosure required under this section need not be furnished regardless of the form in which the draft is recorded.
( ii ) Communications between a party's attorney and the party's expert witness who is required to provide a report under this section need not be furnished regardless of the form of the communications, except if the communications relate to compensation for the expert's study or testimony, identify facts or data that the party's attorney provided and that the expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed, or identify assumptions that the party's attorney provided and that the expert relied on in forming the opinions to be expressed.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 50235, July 29, 2016]
```

[115th Congress Public Law 317]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4434]]

Public Law 115-317
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Major Robert 
   Odell Owens Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2018 -  [H.R. 5238]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.

    Approved December 14, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5238:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            July 16, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12b-13 Preparation of statement or report.

The statement or report shall contain the numbers and captions of all items of the appropriate form, but the text of the items may be omitted provided the answers thereto are so prepared as to indicate to the reader the coverage of the items without the necessity of his referring to the text of the items or instructions thereto. However, where any item requires information to be given in tabular form, it shall be given in substantially the tabular form specified in the item. All instructions, whether appearing under the items of the form or elsewhere therein, are to be omitted. Unless expressly provided otherwise, if any item is inapplicable or the answer thereto is in the negative, an appropriate statement to that effect shall be made.

(Secs. 4, 16, 19, 24, 48 Stat. 77, 896, 85, as amended, 901; 15 U.S.C. 77d, 78p, 77s, 78x)

[30 FR 2023, Feb. 13, 1965]
§ 230.135a Generic advertising. ( a ) For the purposes only of section 5 of the Act, a notice, circular, advertisement, letter, sign, or other communication, published or transmitted to any person which does not specifically refer by name to the securities of a particular investment company, to the investment company itself, or to any other securities not exempt under section 3(a) of the Act, will not be deemed to offer any security for sale, provided: ( 1 ) Such communication is limited to any one or more of the following: ( i ) Explanatory information relating to securities of investment companies generally or to the nature of investment companies, or to services offered in connection with the ownership of such securities,
( ii ) The mention or explanation of investment companies of different generic types or having various investment objectives, such as *balanced funds, growth funds, income funds, leveraged funds, specialty funds, variable annuities, bond funds,* and *no-load funds,*
( iii ) Offers, descriptions, and explanation of various products and services not constituting a security subject to registration under the Act: *Provided,* That such offers, descriptions, and explanations do not relate directly to the desirability of owning or purchasing a security issued by a registered investment company,
( iv ) Invitation to inquire for further information, and
( 2 ) Such communication contains the name and address of a registered broker or dealer or other person sponsoring the communication.
( b ) If such communication contains a solicitation of inquiries and prospectuses for investment company securities are to be sent or delivered in response to such inquiries, the number of such investment companies and, if applicable, the fact that the sponsor of the communication is the principal underwriter or investment adviser in respect to such investment companies shall be stated.
( c ) With respect to any communication describing any type of security, service, or product, the broker, dealer, or other person sponsoring such communication must offer for sale a security, service, or product of the type described in such communication.
[37 FR 10073, May 19, 1972, as amended at 37 FR 10931, June 1, 1972]
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 260 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 260.11b-6 Definition of “self-liquidating paper” in section 311(b)(6).

The term *self-liquidating paper,* as used in section 311(b)(6) of the Act, means any draft, bill of exchange, acceptance or obligation which is made, drawn, negotiated or incurred by the obligor for the purpose of financing the purchase, processing, manufacture, shipment, storage or sale of goods, wares or merchandise and which is secured by documents evidencing title to, possession of or a lien upon the goods, wares or merchandise or the receivables or proceeds arising from the sale of the goods, wares or merchandise previously constituting the security: *Provided,* The security is received by the trustee simultaneously with the creation of the creditor relationship with the obligor arising from the making, drawing, negotiating or incurring of the draft, bill of exchange, acceptance or obligation.
#### Henry Cebularz, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Annette M. Diorio, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 118]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Henry Cebularz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated January 24, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar *976as asserted by him on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Henry Cebularz.

The defendant’s proof in support of that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the claim of the plaintiff Henry Cebularz (hereinafter the plaintiff) failed to establish the defendant’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the theory that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Miller v Afshin,*28 AD3d 437 [2006]; *Ribaudo v Amir,*27 AD3d 544 [2006]; *Dockery v Budget Rent-A-Car,*27 AD3d 413 [2006]; *Rich-Wing v Baboolal,*18 AD3d 726 [2005]; *Tchjevskaia v Chase,*15 AD3d 389 [2005]; *Naydis v LA Transp. Corp.,*14 AD3d 673 [2005]). The defendant’s examining orthopedist’s affirmation was inconclusive. The defendant’s examining neurologist identified, inter alia, evidence of cervical radiculopathy *(see Smith v Delcore,*29 AD3d 890 [2006]), but his report was otherwise inconclusive. The defendant’s examining radiologist noted that the April 14, *2003*magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) report of the plaintiffs cervical spine showed herniations at C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7. Although those herniations were also reflected on a cervical spine MRI taken on June 9, 2000, prior to the subject accident, the defendant’s radiologist noted that the herniations appeared “slightly more prominent in size” in the April 2003 MRI. The defendant’s proof collectively tended to support rather than to negate the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs injuries from prior accidents or conditions predating the subject automobile accident were exacerbated by the subject accident, necessitating the spinal fusion and discectomy surgery the plaintiff underwent in April 2004.

Under the circumstances, the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident *(see Gentile v Snook,*20 AD3d 389 [2005]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff *(see Trunk v Spross,*306 AD2d 463 [2003]; *Phillips v Tissotvanpatot,*280 AD2d 735 [2001], citing *Walsh v Kings Plaza Replacement Serv.,*239 AD2d 408 [1997]; *cf. Correa v City of New York,*18 AD3d 418 [2005]). Luciano, J.P., Rivera, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.
§ 230.137 Publications or distributions of research reports by brokers or dealers that are not participating in an issuer's registered distribution of securities. Under the following conditions, the terms “offers,” “participates,” or “participation” in section 2(a)(11) of the Act shall not be deemed to apply to the publication or distribution of research reports with respect to the securities of an issuer which is the subject of an offering pursuant to a registration statement that the issuer proposes to file, or has filed, or that is effective: ( a ) The broker or dealer (and any affiliate) that has distributed the report and, if different, the person (and any affiliate) that has published the report have not participated, are not participating, and do not propose to participate in the distribution of the securities that are or will be the subject of the registered offering.
( b ) In connection with the publication or distribution of the research report, the broker or dealer (and any affiliate) that has distributed the report and, if different, the person (and any affiliate) that has published the report are not receiving and have not received consideration directly or indirectly from, and are not acting under any direct or indirect arrangement or understanding with: ( 1 ) The issuer of the securities;
( 2 ) A selling security holder;
( 3 ) Any participant in the distribution of the securities that are or will be the subject of the registration statement; or
( 4 ) Any other person interested in the securities that are or will be the subject of the registration statement. *Instruction to § 230.137(b) .* This paragraph (b) does not preclude payment of: 1. The regular price being paid by the broker or dealer for independent research, so long as the conditions of this paragraph (b) are satisfied; or 2. The regular subscription or purchase price for the research report.
( c ) The broker or dealer publishes or distributes the research report in the regular course of its business.
( d ) The issuer is not and during the past three years neither the issuer nor any of its predecessors was: ( 1 ) A blank check company as defined in Rule 419(a)(2) (§ 230.419(a)(2));
( 2 ) A shell company, other than a business combination related shell company, each as defined in Rule 405 (§ 230.405); or
( 3 ) An issuer for an offering of penny stock as defined in Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 240.3a51-1 of this chapter).
( e ) *Definition of research report.* For purposes of this section, *research report* means a written communication, as defined in Rule 405, that includes information, opinions, or recommendations with respect to securities of an issuer or an analysis of a security or an issuer, whether or not it provides information reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.
[70 FR 44802, Aug. 3, 2005]
Part 5331 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures       DAFFARS PART 5331 Knowledge Center          *Revised: June 2023*          See FAR Class Deviation 2011-O0006.          See MP5301.601(a)(i).                                       Subpart 5331.1 – APPLICABILTY                                                         5331.109 Advance agreements.    Subpart 5331.1 – APPLICABILTY               5331.109 Advance agreements.       (h) Pre-contract cost agreements should be reviewed for legal sufficiency (see this template for a sample Pre-contract Cost Agreement). As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement, the correct type of funds should be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement. While not legally necessary, prudent business acumen would dictate, that to the maximum extent possible, agreement on terms and conditions also be established prior to issuance of a pre-contract cost agreement. Contracting officers should consult with the designated clearance approval authority prior to agreement on pre-contract costs. The contracting officer should incorporate the pre-contract cost agreement into any resultant contract as an attachment within Section J.
1850.104-4 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall obtain the NASA Administrator's approval prior to including clause 52.250–1 in a contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1850.1—Extraordinary Contractual Actions
###### Editorial Note on Part 249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 249 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 249.510 Form 10-M, consent to service of process by a nonresident general partner of a broker-dealer firm.

This form shall be filed pursuant to Rule 15b1-5 (§ 240.15b1-5 of this chapter) by each nonresident general partner of a broker-dealer firm registered or applying for registration pursuant to section 15 of the Act.

[33 FR 18995, Dec. 20, 1968]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form 10-M, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### Central Park Studios et al., Respondents, v. Richard Eyre, Defendant-Appellant.

— -Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
### §16458. Enforcement

The Commission shall have the same powers as set forth in sections 825e through 825p of title 16 to enforce the provisions of this part.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1270, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 976.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle F (§§1261–1277) of title XII of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 972, which enacted this part, amended sections 824 and 824m of Title 16, Conservation, repealed chapter 2C (§79 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and section 825q of Title 16, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 15801 and 16451 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle F to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15801 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


• the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:Dated: October 30, 2023By/s/ Dino E. RobustoDino E. RobustoChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richmond County Credit Association, Inc., Defendant. Stanley N. Lipsitz, as Receiver of Defendant Corporation, Appellant.

Appeal by a receiver in proceedings supplementary to judgment from orders confirming the report of an Official Referee and denying said receiver’s motion to direct the city treasurer to turn over to him a fund which had been deposited as the result of an action brought by the Attorney-General against defendant corporation under article 23-A of the General Business Law (the Martin Act). Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
§ 290.4 Preparation and filing of reports. ( a ) Every report required by this regulation shall be filed under cover of a letter of transmittal which shall state the nature of the report and indicate the particular rule and subdivision thereof pursuant to which the report is filed. At least the original of every such letter shall be signed on behalf of the EBRD by a duly authorized officer thereof.
( b ) Two copies of every report, including the letter of transmittal, exhibits and other papers and documents comprising a part of the report, shall be filed with the Commission.
( c ) The report shall be in the English language. If any exhibit or other paper or document filed with the report is in a foreign language, it shall be accompanied by a translation into the English language.
( d ) Reports pursuant to § 290.3 may be filed in the form of a prospectus to the extent that such prospectus contains the information specified in Schedule A of this Part.
#### In the Matter of: Jack E. PRATT, Jr., Debtor. The Cadle Co, as successor by purchase and assignment of the interests of Scott M. Seidel, Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy Estate of Jack E. Pratt, Jr., Appellant v. Jack E. Pratt, Sr., Appellee.

No. 05-11352.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 13, 2007.

Bruce William Akerly, Bell, Nunnally *&*Martin, Dallas, TX, for Appellant.

Jay M. Vogelson, Stutzman, Bromberg, Esserman & Plifka, Richard Bernard Schiro, Law Offices of Richard B. Schiro, Dallas, TX, for Appellee.

Before KING, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Final Judgment of the district court, entered July 27, 2005, is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered that same date.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §14711. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §101, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2845, related to commercialization of Space Station. Subsec. (a) was repealed and reenacted as subsec. (a) of section 50111 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs. Subsec. (b), which required the Administrator to deliver certain studies and reports to Congress, the last of which was required before budget request for fiscal year 2000, was repealed as obsolete.
#### Giles L. Dover, Appellant, v. Alice I. Dover, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §10249. Cooperation of other departments and agencies

Each department, agency, and instrumentality of the United States, including any independent agency, may furnish the Negotiator such information as he determines to be necessary to carry out his functions under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title IV, §409, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5041, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–247.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4032 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4032

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 2010 
          increase in the deduction for start-up expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2012

    Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. 
McDermott, and Mr. Connolly of Virginia) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 2010 
          increase in the deduction for start-up expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Entrepreneurs Create American 
Jobs Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR START-UP EXPENSES MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Clause (ii) of section 195(b)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting ``$10,000'', and
            (2) by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$60,000''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of section 195 of such 
Code is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```