alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 16, 2004, 12 p.m. to November 16, 2004, 4 p.m., One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington Circle, Washington, DC, 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 3, 2004, 69 FR 64078-64081.                 

The meeting will be held December 10, 2004. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26887 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ANSI Accredited Standards Committee ``C84''

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ANSI Accredited Standards 
Committee ``C84'' (``C84 Committee''), by its Secretariat, National 
Electrical Manufacturers Association (``NEMA''), has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI 
Accredited Standards Committee ``C84'', Rosslyn, VA. The nature and 
scope of C84 Committee's standards development activities are: to 
develop and maintain American National Standards related to preferred 
voltage ratings for AC systems and equipment. C84 Committee currently 
maintains one standard relating to voltage ratings for electric power 
equipment systems operating at 60 Hertz or less. The standards 
developed by C84 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27062 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 230.507 Disqualifying provision relating to exemptions under §§ 230.504 and 230.506. ( a ) No exemption under § 230.504 or § 230.506 shall be available for an issuer if such issuer, any of its predecessors or affiliates have been subject to any order, judgment, or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction temporarily, preliminary or permanently enjoining such person for failure to comply with § 230.503.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply if the Commission determines, upon a showing of good cause, that it is not necessary under the circumstances that the exemption be denied.
[54 FR 11374, Mar. 20, 1989, as amended at 81 FR 83553, Nov. 21, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71076-71077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-141]


Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 1 et seq.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a 
NASA Exploration Transportation System Strategic Roadmap Committee is 
necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance 
of duties imposed upon NASA by law. This determination follows 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: NASA Exploration Transportation System Strategic 
Roadmap Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The Committee will advise the NASA 
Administrator on developing a new launch system and crew exploration 
vehicle to provide transportation to and beyond low Earth orbit. The 
Committee will draw on the expertise of its members and other sources 
to provide its advice and recommendations to the Agency. The Committee 
will hold meetings and make site visits as necessary to accomplish 
their responsibilities. The Committee will function solely as an 
advisory board and will comply fully with the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    Lack of Duplication of Resources: The Committee's functions cannot 
be performed by the agency, another existing committee, or other means 
such as a public meeting.
    Fairly Balanced Membership: The Committee will consist of a balance 
of experts from within the government, private industry, and academia. 
In addition, there may be additional experts selected for Subcommittees 
or Task Forces. Members of the Committee, Subcommittee or Task Forces 
will be chosen from among industry, academia, and government with 
recognized

[[Page 71077]]

knowledge and expertise in specific areas across the NASA portfolio. 
Total membership will reflect a fairly balanced view.
    Duration: Ad hoc.
    Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Marc Allen, Advanced Planning and 
Integration Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546, telephone (202) 358-2373.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26970 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71757-71758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[REG-101282-04]
RIN 1545-BD06


Treatment of a Stapled Foreign Corporation Under Section 269B and 
367(b); Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 71758]]

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations 
concerning the definition and tax treatment of a stapled foreign 
corporation, which generally is treated for tax purposes as a domestic 
corporation under section 269B of the Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for December 15, 2004 at 
10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaNita Van Dyke of the Publications 
and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief 
Counsel (Procedures and Administration), at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 
September 7, 2004, (69 FR 54067), announced that a public hearing was 
scheduled for December 15, 2004, at 10 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, 
Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 269B 
of the Internal Revenue Code.
    The public comment period for these regulations expired on December 
6, 2004. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public 
hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be 
addressed. As of Tuesday, December 7, 2004, no one has requested to 
speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for December 15, 2004, 
is cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-27160 Filed 12-7-04; 3:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Gregory Enterprises : Inspector Nation

The Home Inspection Training Center

2579 Eric Lane Unit B

Burlington NC 27215

Petitioner: Gregory Enterprises: Inspector Nation

Contact: Bonnie Gregory

2579 Eric L ane Unit B

Burlington NC 27215

336 350 8970

E mail: gregoryengineers@cs.com

Description of Relief Sought:

T he petitioner s request to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aeria l inspection s of

residential structures during home and engineering inspections to colle c t aeria l data for consumer

information using aerial photography and videography

.

Request: Relief of Section of 14 CFR: Part 21 and subpart H; §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5),

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent nece ssary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform

aerial data colle ct ion for residential struc tural inspection , home inspection, roof inspection, engineering

training, and home inspection training.

Plea:

The use of a drone during engineering inspections and home inspection s greatly benef its the general

public to gain information on the general condition and safety of a home or building including fire

hazards related to chimney defec ts. The use of the drone for engineering and home inspection is

typically at heights below 30 feet and confined to a very limited are a just over the subject property

. The inspections are conducted as a visual observer with a continuous line of sight. All inspectors will be

trained

, and certified to safely maintain, manage and operate drone equipment.

UAS Equipment: The UAS proposed by the petitioner are s mall dr ones, the DJI Ins pire 1, DJI Phantom 3,

DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+.

Sincerely,

Gregory Enterprises: Inspector Nation

Bonnie Gregory

2579 Eric Lane Unit B

Burlington NC 27215
#### Margaret Mishaan, Appellant, v Neil Tobias, Defendant, and City of New York, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 640]

*1001In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), entered August 29, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendant City of New York’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion of the defendant City of New York which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against that defendant.

The plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell on a cracked and broken concrete public sidewalk in front of the premises owned and maintained by the defendant Neil Tobias (hereinafter the premises). The defendant City of New York moved, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that, as a matter of law, the claimed defect, a raised portion of the sidewalk in front of the premises, did not constitute a dangerous or defective condition as it was too trivial to be actionable.

“Generally, the issue of whether a dangerous or defective condition exists on the property of another depends on the peculiar circumstances of each case and presents a question of fact for the jury. However, trivial defects are not actionable, and in determining whether a defect is trivial, a court must examine all of the facts presented, including the width, depth, elevation, irregularity, and appearance of the defect, along with the time, place, and circumstances of the injury” *(Pennella v 277 Bronx Riv. Rd. Owners,*309 AD2d 793, 794 [2003]).

Scrutiny of the photographs provided by the plaintiff depicting the alleged defect show that it consisted of a cracked and broken sidewalk, and that a portion of that sidewalk was raised, at least an inch in height, over the remaining portion of the sidewalk. Those photographs, together with the other evidence presented, showed the existence of a factual question as to whether the alleged defect was trivial *(see Adsmond v City of Poughkeepsie,*283 AD2d 598 [2001]; *see generally Trincere v*
      *1002
      *County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976 [1997], *affg*232 AD2d 400 [1996]; *see also Argenio v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*277 AD2d 165 [2000]). Accordingly, the City was not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Florio, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §17901. Coordination of Federal activities with adopted standards and implementation specifications

#### (a) Spending on health information technology systems

As each agency (as defined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services) implements, acquires, or upgrades health information technology systems used for the direct exchange of individually identifiable health information between agencies and with non-Federal entities, it shall utilize, where available, health information technology systems and products that meet standards and implementation specifications adopted under section 300jj–14 of this title, as added by section 13101.1

#### (b) Federal information collection activities

With respect to a standard or implementation specification adopted under section 300jj–14 of this title, as added by section 13101, the President shall take measures to ensure that Federal activities involving the broad collection and submission of health information are consistent with such standard or implementation specification, respectively, within three years after the date of such adoption.

#### (c) Application of definitions

The definitions contained in section 300jj of this title, as added by section 13101,1 shall apply for purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title XIII, §13111, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 13101, referred to in text, means section 13101 of div. A of Pub. L. 111–5.

1 See References in Text note below.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-624]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 18, 2012, 10 a.m.-11.a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matter To Be Considered: Briefing Matter: Infant Swings--Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/webcast. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-624 Filed 1-10-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Part 5339 - Acquisition of Information

Technology

DAFFARS PART 5339 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

5339.101 Policy

5339.7201-90 Data Servers/Centers Approval Process

5339.101 Policy

(1) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5339.7201-90 Data Servers/Centers Approval Process

Purchase Request packages for data servers/centers must include SAF/CIO A6 approval to be

accepted as valid for procurement action by a contracting officer.

See DAFM 17-1301, Computer Security, COMPUSEC, paragraph 2.9.1.3 & 3.6.1
§ 432.2 Required disclosures. Whenever any direct or indirect representation is made of the power output, power band or power frequency response, or distortion characteristics of sound power amplification equipment, the manufacturer's rated power output shall be disclosed subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The rated power output is measured in compliance with the standard test conditions in § 432.3;
( b ) The rated power output is disclosed clearly, conspicuously, and more prominently than any other representations or disclosures permitted under this part;
( c ) The disclosure of the rated power output is clearly and conspicuously labeled “FTC Power Output Rating”; and
( d ) The disclosures or representations required under this section shall not be made by a footnote, asterisk, or similar notation.
[89 FR 49801, June 12, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.552 NEPA planning. Where it is reasonably foreseeable by the Commission that it may be required to act on a matter specified in § 200.551 and that matter is likely to involve major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, the Commission shall: ( a ) Advise the relevant persons as to information respecting the environment, if any, which may later be required to be submitted for Commission consideration should Commission action become necessary;
( b ) Consult on any environmental factors involved with individuals, organizations, and state and local authorities interested in the planned action; and
( c ) Begin implementing the procedures set forth in §§ 200.553 and 200.554 as soon as possible, *Provided,* That such procedures are not inconsistent with the Commission's authority under the Federal securities laws.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 22,
2019, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report
has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
### §14135b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14135b was editorially reclassified as section 40703 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 392 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 392

                    For the relief of Geert Botzen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2011

Ms. Lee of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Geert Botzen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GEERT BOTZEN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Geert Botzen shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Geert Botzen enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), and is not 
inadmissible under paragraph (2) or (3) of section 212(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, he shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Geert Botzen, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```