alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Executive summary
- The prospective payment system in home health care
Figure 1. Clinical, functional, and service information from OASIS determines patients' home health case-mix classification and case-mix weight
Figure 2. Most beneficiaries had little or no problem accessing home health services, 2000–2003

- Descriptive analysis of agency characteristics, case mix, and margin
Figure 3. Distribution of Medicare margin by agency case mix, 2002 primary sample
Figure 3-A. Trimming the sample narrowed the margins' distribution
Table 1. Distribution of Medicare margins for home health agencies, 2002
Table 2. Distribution of case-mix score by agency size, 2002

- Multivariate analysis of margin
Table 3. Least-squares estimates of determinants of the payment-to-cost ratio

- Conclusion
- Discussion
- References
- Endnotes
- Appendix A: Mandate for report
- Appendix B: Data and methods
Data sources and file construction
- Table B-1. Home health agency sample used for report
Variable construction
Limitations of the analysis
- Table B-2. Variable definitions: Characteristics of home health patients

- More about MedPAC

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:51:46-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 39.9 Scope.

Except as otherwise provided by Commission order, the provisions of this subpart B apply to any derivatives clearing organization, as defined under section 1a(15) of the Act and § 1.3 of this chapter, that is registered with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization pursuant to section 5b of the Act. The provisions of this subpart B do not apply to any exempt derivatives clearing organization, as defined under § 39.2.

[86 FR 968, Jan. 7, 2021]
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM S32702 Appellee ) )

v. ) ) ORDER

Jose R. PENA ) Airman First Class (E

- 3) )

U.S. Air Force ) Appellant ) Panel 1

On 1 April 2022, Appellant submitt ed a Motion to Withdr aw from Ap pellate Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach DD

Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special

Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals , signed by
Appellant and Appel lant’s counsel on 28 March 2022 and 1 April 2022, respectively. The Government did not submit any opposition

. Accordingly

, it is by the court on this 7 th day of April , 20 2 2

,

ORDERED :

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Attach is

GRANTE D . Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records Branch,
JAJM, for further processing in accordance with R ules for Courts

- Martial
1115(f)(3) and 1201

, Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (2019 ed.)

.

FOR THE COURT

FLEMING E. KEEFE, Capt , USAF Acting Deputy Clerk of the Court
### §2473a. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §118(b), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2241

Section, Pub. L. 87–367, title II, §206(b), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 791, required Administrator of National Aeronautics and Space Administration to submit to Congress, not later than 45 days after close of each fiscal year, a report which sets forth, as of close of such fiscal year, the number of positions established, the name, compensation, and qualification of each incumbent, position or positions held in or outside Federal Government by each incumbent during the 5 years immediately preceding date of appointment, and such other information as required by Congress and authorized Administrator to omit any information deemed detrimental to national security, to inform Congress of such omission, and to supply all information concerning such matter at request of any Congressional committee.
§ 39.38 Efficiency for systemically important derivatives clearing organizations and subpart C derivatives clearing organizations. ( a ) *General rule.* In order to meet the needs of clearing members and markets, each systemically important derivatives clearing organization and subpart C derivatives clearing organization should efficiently and effectively design its: ( 1 ) Clearing and settlement arrangements;
( 2 ) Operating structure and procedures;
( 3 ) Scope of products cleared; and
( 4 ) Use of technology.
( b ) *Review of efficiency.* Each systemically important derivatives clearing organization and subpart C derivatives clearing organization should establish a mechanism to review, on a regular basis, its compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Clear goals and objectives.* Each systemically important derivatives clearing organization and subpart C derivatives clearing organization should have clearly defined goals and objectives that are measurable and achievable, including in the areas of minimum service levels, risk management expectations, and business priorities.
( d ) Each systemically important derivatives clearing organization and subpart C derivatives clearing organization shall facilitate efficient payment, clearing and settlement by accommodating internationally accepted communication procedures and standards.
# National Archives and Records Administration Office of the Federal Register JUL 2 • 2009

Ms. Clara Barley Department ofEnergy Office ofGeneral Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Room 6E078, GC-74 Washington, DC 20585

Dear Ms. Barley: I approve the following standards for incorporation by reference into Part 431 ofTitle 10 ofthe 

### Code o/Federal Regulations as listed in the attachment.

- .. --- This approval is contingent upon the [mal rule containing any language changes, agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference these publications is effective on the effective date ofyour final rule. Ifyou wish to enforce some other edition ofthe publications approved, you must: 1. Publish notice ofthe change in the 

### FederalRegister, amend the 

### Code of Federal 

### Regulations; and 2. Ensure that a copy ofthat edition is on file at the Office ofthe Federal Register; and 3. Notify me 

### in writing ofthe change. lfyou have any questions concerning this incorporation by reference, please call our Legal Staff on 2-741-60



### y**A.~OSLEY** Direct r ofthe Federal Register Federal Register

# Attornexlr!6
Attachment

US. mail address: 8601 Adt'Jphi Road, College Pa::::k, MD 20740-6001 OfficClOCiition: 800 Nort:Ktapitoi**StIeeCNVii,SUit~** 700,WalihirigtDn, DC 200024244· FE!decal Register web sites; hupJjwww.archives.gov/federal-register Qnd http:/(www.gpoaccess.gov/nara**Z.~09~17LGOZ.**

## Material Approved for Incorporation By

## Reference
American Society of**Heatin~** 

### Refrigerating. and Air-Conditioning En&ineers, Inc, ANSI-ASHRAE 32.1-2004 ASHRAE 32.1-2004, Methods afTestingfor Rating Vending Mtu:hinesfor**Bott~ed,** Canned, and Other Sealed Beverages 2004 CFR Title. Part. Secti"n 1 0.431.293(b)(2} Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers AHAMHRF-1-2004 ANSI-AHAM HRF-1-2004, Energy, Performance and Capacity of Household Refrigerators,**Refriger~tor-Freezers** and Freezers 2004 eFR Htle. PR-rt. SectUm 10.431.293(:»(1) 10431 292

printed: Friday, July 24, 2009 Page 1011**Z:~09~vLGOZ:** eJBN
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ronke Olley and Jeff Olley v. Driftwood Hospitality Mgt II 

LLC, Manager of Hyatt House Houston/Energy Corridor

Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00889-CV

Trial court case number: 1057687

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

On October 16, 2015, appellants, Ronke Olley and Jeff Olley, proceeding pro se, 

filed an affidavit of indigence for appellate costs in the trial court with their notice of 

appeal from the final judgment in the above-referenced trial court proceeding. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(2), (c)(1). On November 13, 2015, appellants filed a notice in this 

Court that the trial court had signed an order denying the county clerk’s contest to their 

affidavit on November 4, 2015. See id. (e)(1), (i)(4), (j)(5). Also on November 13, 2015, 

the trial clerk filed an original clerk’s record in this Court with, among other things, the 

trial court’s judgment and order, signed on November 4, 2015, denying the county clerk’s 

contest to appellants’ affidavit. See id. 20.1(e)(1), (i)(4). An order overruling a contest to 

an affidavit of indigence is not subject to appellate review. See id. 20.1(j)(5).

Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit of indigence are deemed true, and 

appellants are entitled to proceed without advance payment of appellate costs. See TEX.

R. APP. P. at 20.1(f). Because the court reporter filed an information sheet on October 

20, 2015, stating that no reporter’s record was taken, and the clerk’s record was already 

filed on November 13, 2015, the Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the 

appellants indigent and that they are allowed to proceed on appeal without advance 

payment of costs for purposes of the appellate filing fee and the clerk’s record fee.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 ng for the Court

Date: December 15, 2015
# Appendix C

Phantom 2 Quick Start Guide

(Source: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/download)....-FrontSide\\\\\\/(/((/ct-'--------------"}II\Mlcro--USBFrortLEDSS2OowerSwitchAntenna:'-r.....Sl•----Joy,tkbPoworIndicator'Ill'...GimbalPitchCor.trolLever''''""""'"""""&·---'!l!IO'!tt"-¥_>UU'H1'1Wrl.•""""""""'...._...._.....,"'-''f'"l11.Ura.<BasicFlightOperations..ForwardDirection{lndicatesSidt>)•..(@•(.t'\?'t>..,_St;ck"'•!'*·':><:,-..-.....·-,,_'jib,.,........,.(@t·\,-../•...({2)1..1.\\\Sette<yL-••.evellodi<etoc----""-:.---------·----;;;r-------------u,uc::gh!'eoicc!c"B<JtterrPow"'"Hwtt<mAote,,nl!I·l:1>PHANTOl¥12QUICKSTARTGUIDEScanQRCodetoWatchtheQuickStartVideoorbrowsedirectto(!)Product(2)QuickStartGuide<))H3-2UGimbalAssembly/Jr.Formsa:""dk'l"furth11rinstruction,1tth.1tY"Uwntcht"lflvukor.abovenfullt:cforoattemptingtt'thef>tumtofTI2THEFLIGHT,.ON/OFFPres>ttm1-IH:ular.;u\.onOfi<..H,Uwnpre<;sandholdfur23cco11dstotheflightbflttcry.).Pms5thecircularhut:onone{!,tho"holdfor2tn!urnr-ffthPfl.ghfhattf'ry.AATTEr--lT!ON:Pres.;mqthecircularbuttonO'lCew1thr-cfurtheractto'lw>ll.ndK:ntecwn;ntBA-TERYLEVEL•••Boll<>rtl..,vslnc•ca!:>rATTACHINGTHEPROPELLERSRP.movethefoJrwar"llngc8rdsfromthemotors.>Screwthepropellers,clockwis!!forgreynutsandantk!ock"wiseforblacknuts,nntothefourmotors.Be5Uretomate!-theblackpropellernutswiththeblackdotrrotors.iiATIENTION,DO\JOTuaethreadlockonthepropeUershafts.FLIGHTINDICATORS:>fl<JshingHladyto'lywithGPS.>Sbwyellowflashingindkotesroodytoflyw1thcutGPS.,..ir,dicatesyourRemotoCon:rollor,..f-astredirdicateslowfl:ghlbatterylevel>Piaasorefertot1ecardattachedtotheRemoteContrt!llerfcrrror!?detais.•/P":ETUPOFTHEZENMUSEH3-2DGIMBAL(OPTIONAL)-----·-------·-··>TheZENMLSEH:!:-2Dgirnbalisrecommt!nr••dforabetteraerialexperierce.Theinstallat"""Jnisquickandconvement,astheGCUandothercontrolwterfaceshavebeerbuilti1tOthePhantom2.refertothe"H3-2DGimbalSt..rtGu•cle"formoredetails.•."""..,-,--·!;&l1\P':ALIBRATINGTHECOMPASS>R"f'rdlyflptimfr-;.>•nthe'fullyup'to'',.·Fts'oydown'posotionsfor»theLEDFlightto,ol!dyellow.the>HnldlrgPh,rtnm')it?i<'lOax·sunlillheLEDFlight!11dic:otorssw1tchto>711enwh1hthold1'19t•wPi"o<>ntoM2"IN11ca!ly,m!o!<•360'r.m1\sc<J,tara><murti1ttmLEOI='hghtndi:ntor3hghtd1•P;ppoor>.Af,TIEtHION:IftheLEDIndicatorsflastobetw00nvt'l'ow'.lndn1d,thon111,.hu•FAILED.You.,.,.,randrepeutth<tp1fl\IIOUS!rtep<Ufll.llthaproceS!l5SUCCFSSfu)cJ.,.!'-(i)®ciIrTHEREMOTECONTROLLER>89sureSla11dS2areswi:ched\oupp"'rnostpos1t.Jon.>lnstail4xAAbatteriesJntothetao.oftheRecnoteController.AAITENT!ON:Aco"lt'rUo\15teeDH"ICsomr::P.m1ttedfrol'l'theRemoteControllerindicate&LoWBATTERYVOLT/IGL52+YOURFIRST,..A/I.TTENT!QN,OhllYrno\(1ro,tl"e2''fl\bmJed,DONOT5l<'p•I-.emoto.-.;<:lur:"9'•ghl!L.
Exhibit 35.8

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

For the period of June 13, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (“Reporting Period”)

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2019-OSB,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2019-OSB (the “Trust”)

 

Situs Holdings, LLC, as Special Servicer, (a “Certifying Servicer”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2019 for the Reporting Period with the applicable servicing criteria specified in Paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the “Relevant Servicing Criteria”).

The Special Servicer has assessed its compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Special Servicer has complied, in all material respects, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

As Executive Managing Director of Situs Holdings, LLC, I certify that:

A.A review of the Special Servicer’s activities during the preceding calendar year and of Special Servicer’s performance under the Trust and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 

B.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period.  

 

Date:  February 20, 2020

 

SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, 

as Special Servicer

 

| By:    | /s/ George Wisniewski |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | George Wisniewski |
|   | Title:                | Executive Managing Director |
# Subpart 3408.8—Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies

**Parent topic:**PART 3408—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

## 3408.871 Paperwork reduction.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.208–72 (Paperwork Reduction Act) in all solicitations and contracts in which the contractor will develop forms or documents for public use.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, New 
Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 committee of the Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service. The TAP will use citizen input to make recommendations to the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, January 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
206-220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, January 5, 2005 from 2 p.m. Pacific time to 3 p.m. Pacific 
time via a telephone conference call. The public is invited to make 
oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you 
would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-
888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, TAP Office, 915 
2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6096.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 3, 2004.
Bernard Coston,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 04-26958 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.11a1-4(T) Bond transactions on national securities exchanges.

A transaction in a bond, note, debenture, or other form of indebtedness effected on a national securities exchange by a member for its own account or the account of an associated person thereof shall be deemed to be of a kind which is consistent with the purposes of section 11(a)(1) of the Act, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets.

(Secs. 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 11A, 15 and 23 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78b, 78c, 78f, 78j, 78k, 78k-1, 78*o,* and 78w))

[43 FR 18562, May 1, 1978]
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Motion for Emergency Relief Denied 

as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00802-CR

NO. 14-14-00803-CR

NO. 14-14-00804-CR

IN RE TIFFANY DAVIS AND NAYAJAH DAVIS, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1412474, 1412475, 1412476

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 7, 2014, relators Tiffany Davis and Nayajah Davis filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also 

Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable 

Denise Bradley, presiding judge of the 262nd District Court of Harris County, to 

vacate a purported order granting a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum filed 
2

by real party in interest Harris County Precinct One Constable’s Office. Also on 

October 7, 2014, relators filed a motion for emergency relief, asking this court to 

stay the trial scheduled in the underlying proceedings pending this court’s 

consideration of relators’ petition.

Relators have not satisfied their burden to demonstrate entitlement to 

mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

We also deny as moot relators’ motion for emergency relief. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Jonathan B. Hill

T: +1 202 962 8356

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

March 12, 2014

Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Streamlining Docket DOT-OST-2005-22228

Dear Director Gretch:

On behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”), please accept this letter as a request 

that the Department of Transportation (“Department”) add certain exemption authority to its 

consolidated certificate issued in Order 2009-9-4 in Docket DOT-OST-2005-22228. JetBlue holds the 

requisite blanket open-skies certificate.1

The chart below sets forth the markets that JetBlue requests be added to its consolidated 

certificate for non-limited entry markets.

Non-limited Entry Markets

Country-Routing Authority Order granting/renewing 

authority

Docket

Any point in the United 

States to any point in the 

Cayman Islands

Exemption NOAT on July 18, 2012 OST-2012-0115

Any point in the United 

States to any point in the 

Dominican Republic2

Exemption NOAT on January 17, 2014 OST-2009-0342

 1 DOT Order 2007-7-3.

2 JetBlue’s authority to provide foreign scheduled service between the United States and Santo Domingo and 

Santiago, Dominican Republic (Docket OST-2004-17265) and between New York (JFK) and Puerto Plata, 

Dominican Republic (Docket OST-2007-29358) already has been included in its consolidated certificates. The 

Department’s January 17, 2014 NOAT expanded JetBlue’s exemption authority to provide scheduled 

combination service between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in the Dominican

Republic.
Paul L. Gretch

March 12, 2014

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

Any point in the United 

States to any point in Haiti

Exemption NOAT on May 20, 2013 OST-2013-0099

Any point in the United 

States to any point in Turks 

and Caicos

Exemption NOAT on August 2, 2012 OST-2010-0228

JetBlue further requests, pursuant to Order 2009-12-213 that the Department remove point 

restrictions on the countries and routes already included in JetBlue’s consolidated certificate for nonlimited entry markets. The chart below sets forth the markets it seeks to have broadened.

Country-Routing Authority Order granting/renewing 

authority

Dockets

United States to Bahamas Exemption NOAT on September 8, 2009 OST-2004-18796

United States to Bermuda Exemption NOAT on January 17, 2014 OST-2009-0342

Should you have any questions concerning this application please contact me.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

 3 Order 2009-12-21 (Dec. 23, 2009).
530.201-5 Waiver.

Submit waiver requests to the Senior Procurement Executive.

Parent topic: 530.202 [Reserved]
§ 300.503 Voidable securities transactions. ( a ) Nothing in these Series 500 Rules shall be construed as limiting the rights of a trustee in a liquidation proceeding under the Act to avoid any securities transaction as fraudulent, preferential, or otherwise voidable under applicable law.
( b ) Nothing in these Series 500 Rules shall be construed as limiting the right of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, in a direct payment procedure under section 10 of the Act, to reject a claim for cash or a claim for securities if such claim arose out of a securities transaction which could have been avoided in a liquidation proceeding under the Act.
#### § 170.7 Membership denial (section 17(b)(9) of the Act).

A futures association must provide a fair and orderly procedure for processing membership applications and for affording any person to be denied membership an opportunity to submit evidence in response to the grounds for denial stated by the association. The procedures governing denials of membership in the association shall contain, at a minimum, the procedural safeguards contained in section 17(b)(9) of the Act.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3038-0022)

[44 FR 20651, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 63036, Dec. 30, 1981]