alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-985

____________

CHARLES WILLIAM FINNEY, 

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

[January 26, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Charles William Finney’s appeal of the circuit court’s 

order denying Finney’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

Finney’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s 

decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in 

Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 

(2017). This Court stayed Finney’s appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. 

State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). After this 
- 2 -

Court decided Hitchcock, Finney responded to this Court’s order to show cause 

arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Finney’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the 

State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Finney is not entitled to relief. Finney 

was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of 

nine to three. Finney v. State, 660 So. 2d 674, 679 (Fla. 1995). Finney’s sentence 

of death became final in 1996. Finney v. Florida, 516 U.S. 1096 (1996). Thus, 

Hurst does not apply retroactively to Finney’s sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 

226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Finney’s motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Finney, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

QUINCE, J., recused.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County, 
- 3 -

Michelle Sisco, Judge - Case No. 291991CF001611000AHC

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Scott Gavin, and Suzanne 

Myers Keffer, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina Z. Pacheco, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tampa, Florida,

for Appellee
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNumerical Investigation of a Shielded Chevron NozzleReynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations have been performed on a three-stream inverted velocity profile nozzle with and without various configurations of chevrons attached. The nozzle was mounted on a planform to imitate an engine mounted above a wing, shielding ground observers from engine noise. Several chevron designs intended to aggressively mix the jet and move noise sources upstream for shielding were examined to investigate there effects on noise and thrust. Numerical results for the baseline nozzle and one chevron configuration were compared with far-field noise and particle image velocimetry data obtained in NASA Glenn Research Center's Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory. A configuration in which chevrons alternate penetration into the primary stream and tertiary fan stream was explored using the Modern Design of Experiments approach. Short, high-penetration chevrons demonstrated a significant noise reduction for a relatively small thrust penalty.Document ID20190004929Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHeberling, Brian C.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 2, 2019Publication DateMarch 1, 2019Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-19656NASA/CR-2019-220066Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BWBS: 109492.02.03.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Technical ReviewSingle ExpertKeywordsshieldingchevronsjet noiseAvailable DownloadsNameType20190004929.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20190004940See AlsoNumerical Investigation of a Shielded Chevron Nozzlevisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 230.260 Insignificant deviations from a term, condition or requirement of Regulation A. ( a ) Failure to comply . A failure to comply with a term, condition or requirement of Regulation A will not result in the loss of the exemption from the requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act for any offer or sale to a particular individual or entity, if the person relying on the exemption establishes that: ( 1 ) The failure to comply did not pertain to a term, condition or requirement directly intended to protect that particular individual or entity;
( 2 ) The failure to comply was insignificant with respect to the offering as a whole, provided that any failure to comply with Rule 251(a), (b), and (d)(1) and (3) (§ 230.251(a), (b), and (d)(1) and (3)) shall be deemed to be significant to the offering as a whole; and
( 3 ) A good faith and reasonable attempt was made to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of Regulation A.
( b ) Action by Commission . A transaction made in reliance upon Regulation A must comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of the regulation. Where an exemption is established only through reliance upon paragraph (a) of this section, the failure to comply shall nonetheless be actionable by the Commission under section 20 of the Securities Act.
( c ) Suspension . This provision provides no relief or protection from a proceeding under Rule 258 (§ 230.258).
[80 FR 21895, Apr. 20, 2015]
§ 230.240 Exemption for certain security-based swaps. ( a ) Except as expressly provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Act does not apply to the offer or sale of any security-based swap that is: ( 1 ) A *security-based swap agreement,* as defined in Section 2A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77b(b)-1) as in effect prior to July 16, 2011; and
( 2 ) Entered into between eligible contract participants (as defined in Section 1a(12) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(12)) as in effect prior to July 16, 2011, other than a person who is an eligible contract participant under Section 1a(12)(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act as in effect prior to July 16, 2011).
( b ) The exemption provided in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the provisions of Section 17(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77q(a)).
( c ) This section will expire on February 11, 2018.
[82 FR 10707, Feb. 15, 2017]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4033 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for community 

approval before Indian class III gaming operations may take effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2012 

Mr. SULLIVAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide 

for community approval before Indian class III gaming 

operations may take effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Giving Local Commu5 nities a Voice in Tribal Gaming Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMMUNITY APPROVAL OF TRIBAL-STATE COM7 PACTS. 

8 Section 11(d) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 

9 (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new paragraph: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4033 IH

1 ‘‘(10)(A) No Class III gaming activities may 

2 commence, irrespective of an approved Tribal-State 

3 Compact, unless the elected governing body and 

4 elected executive officials of each county, city, or 

5 other general purpose political subdivision in which 

6 a class III gaming activity under the Tribal-State 

7 Compact is to occur have approved the Class III 

8 gaming facility. 

9 ‘‘(B) The manner in which a Class III gaming 

10 facility is approved under subparagraph (A) shall be 

11 determined by each political subdivision. 

12 ‘‘(C) Each political subdivision shall have 120 

13 days after the date that a Tribal-State Compact is 

14 approved by the Department of Interior Bureau of 

15 Indian Affairs and National Indian Gaming Com16 mission or the site of a class III gaming facility is 

17 identified, whichever comes later, to raise objection. 

18 ‘‘(D) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), a 

19 Tribal-State Compact includes a compact approved 

20 under paragraph (8) or consented to under para21 graph (7)(B)(vi), and the procedures for a class III 

22 gaming activity prescribed under paragraph 

23 (7)(B)(vii).’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4033 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any 

3 Tribal-State compact that has not been entered into under 

4 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act before January 1, 

5 2011. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# ORIGINAI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF NGUYEN-VU PHAM FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

## MAY 2 3 2023
Bowen Greenwood Clark of Supreme Court State of vInntana ORDER

Nguyen-Vu Pham has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana. Pham was placed on inactive status by the State Bar ofMontana pursuant to Rules3B2, 5, and 12 ofthe Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE)on November 30, 2022 as a result ofnoncompliancewith CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 of theCLE Rules, Pham has provided a letter from the State Bar certifyingthat Pham has now completed all CLE requirements "through the reportingyear that ended March 31, 2023." The Petition indicates Pham is not actively practicing law in another jurisdiction; has not been employed as a law clerk while on inactive status; is or has not been: 1) suspended, disbarred, or otherwise ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and isnot currently subject todisciplinary proceedingsorpendingdisciplinary proceedings in anotherjurisdiction, 2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional license, or 5) committed any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT ISHEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofNguyen-Vu Pham for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this2 3 day ofMay, 2023. 

# $ 71/ 7

3 • 4Q • e) f ChiefJustice 05/23/2023

Case Number: PR 06-0544
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), RapidIO Trade Association (“RapidIO”) had filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: RapidIO Trade Association, Austin, TX. The nature and scope of RapidIO's standards development activities are: To direct the future development and drive the adoption of the RapidIO architecture. The RapidIO Interconnect Architecture, designed to be compatible with the most popular integrated communications processors, host processors, and networking digital signal processors, is a high-performance, packet-switched, interconnect technology.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27060  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.17a-8 Financial recordkeeping and reporting of currency and foreign transactions.

Every registered broker or dealer who is subject to the requirements of the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 shall comply with the reporting, recordkeeping and record retention requirements of chapter X of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Where chapter X of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations and § 240.17a-4 of this chapter require the same records or reports to be preserved for different periods of time, such records or reports shall be preserved for the longer period of time.

[46 FR 61455, Dec. 17, 1981, as amended at 76 FR 11328, Mar. 2, 2011]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# NRC and EPRI Memorandum of Understanding and Cooperative Research Addenda.

Accession Number: ML16223A495

Date Released: Friday, October 21, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16223A496 - Transmittal Letter of Renewal of USNRC and EPRI - Memorandum of Understanding. (3 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A497 - Enclosure 1 - Memorandum of Understanding between USNRC and EPRI on Cooperative Nuclear Safety Research. (6 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A500 - Enclosure 2 - Acquisition and Testing of Zion Spent Fuel Pool Neutron Absorber Materials (Renewal). (1 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A501 - Enclosure 3 - Aging, Qualification, and Condition Monitoring of Electrical Cables. (6 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A502 - Enclosure 4 - Digital I&C and Human Factors. (4 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A503 - Enclosure 5 - Fire Risk. (5 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A504 - Enclosure 6 - Long-Term Operations Beyond 60 Years. (6 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A505 - Enclosure 7 - Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking - Crack Initiation Testing. (6 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A506 - Enclosure 8 - Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking Expert Panel Activities (Renewal). (1 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A507 - Enclosure 9 - Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Renewal). (1 page(s), 9/28/2016)
    - ML16223A499 - Enclosure 10 - Seismic Risk. (5 page(s), 9/28/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF THE CLOROX COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996, AS PRESENTED IN THE CLOROX COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FILED FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000021076
<NAME> THE CLOROX COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           66256
<SECURITIES>                                     50495
<RECEIVABLES>                                   276724
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1521
<INVENTORY>                                     147421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                571342
<PP&E>                                          989047
<DEPRECIATION>                                  431593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2225187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           629298
<BONDS>                                         355575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         55422
<OTHER-SE>                                      920487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2225187
<SALES>                                         590773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                590773
<CGS>                                           257361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   473427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1973)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 108822
<INCOME-TAX>                                     43312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              65510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     65510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 21.06 Delegation of authority to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk.

The Commission hereby delegates, until the Commission orders otherwise, the special call authority set forth in § 21.04 to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk to be exercised by such Director or by such other employee or employees of such Director as designated from time to time by the Director. The Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk may submit to the Commission for its consideration any matter which has been delegated in this section. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section to the Director.

[76 FR 69430, Nov. 8, 2011]
### §15003. Records and audits

#### (a) Records

Each recipient of assistance under this subchapter shall keep such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including—

(1) records that fully disclose—

(A) the amount and disposition by such recipient of the assistance;

(B) the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which such assistance is given or used; and

(C) the amount of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking that is supplied by other sources; and

(2) such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

#### (b) Access

The Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipients of assistance under this subchapter that are pertinent to such assistance.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §103, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1688.)
§ 300.23 Linings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings and facings. ( a ) In labeling or marking garments or articles of apparel which are wool products, the fiber content of any linings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings or facings of such garments or articles of apparel shall be given and shall be set forth separately and distinctly in the stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification of the products. ( 1 ) If such linings, trimmings or facings contain, purport to contain or are represented as containing wool, or recycled wool; or
( 2 ) If such linings are metallically coated, or coated or laminated with any substance for warmth, or if such linings are composed of pile fabrics, or any fabrics incorporated for warmth or represented directly or by implication as being incorporated for warmth, which articles the Commission finds constitute a class of articles which is customarily accompanied by express or implied representations of fiber content; or
( 3 ) If any express or implied representations of fiber content of any of such linings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings or facings are customarily made.
( b ) In the case of garments which contain interlinings, the fiber content of such interlinings shall be set forth separately and distinctly as part of the required information on the stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification of such garment. For purposes of this paragraph (b) the term *interlining* means any fabric or fibers incorporated into a garment or article of wearing apparel as a layer between an outershell and an inner lining.
( c ) In the case of wool products which are not garments or articles of apparel, but which contain linings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings, or facings, the stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification of the product shall show the fiber content of such linings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings or facings, set forth separately and distinctly in such stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification.
( d ) Wool products which are or have been manufactured for sale or sold for use as linings, interlinings, paddings, stiffening, trimmings or facings, but not contained in a garment, article of apparel, or other product, shall be labeled or marked with the required information as in the case of other wool products.
[29 FR 6626, May 21, 1964, as amended at 45 FR 44262, July 1, 1980. Redesignated at 63 FR 7517, Feb. 13, 1998]
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.46

                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                   TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF
                     WASTE ROCK FROM THE JOHNSON CAMP MINE"

This document is an amendment ("Amendment") to the "Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Waste Rock from the Johnson Camp Mine" dated December 23, 2004
("Agreement") between Nord Resources Corporation ("Seller") and JC Rock, LLC
("Purchaser").

A) Seller and Purchaser hereby agree to extend the term of the Agreement from
June 30, 2005 to September 30, 2005. The Agreement may also be extended by
special arrangement on specific contracts at the sole option of the Seller.

B) Seller hereby agrees to reduce the royalty from $1.50 per ton to $1.00 per
ton on fines and rock sold by Purchaser to individuals or companies where the
sales price to such individuals or companies is less than $6.00 per ton, FOB
Johnson Camp.

C) Purchaser hereby acknowledges that the Agreement is non-exclusive and hereby
reaffirms Seller's right to sell Johnson Camp rock that is not in Purchaser's
inventory to any individual or company during the term of the Agreement.

Dated June 30, 2005

NORD RESOURCES CORPORATION              JC ROCK, LLC


By: /s/ Kathy Glidewell                 By: /s/ James L. Rodman
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------