alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:01621cf3-d0f6-4b58-9591-d06a20ae5318,g:da3c616d-30a4-48d1-84ba-447146e9cca9-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cna="http://www.cna.com/20220427" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.cna.com/20220427">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4/dei-2021q4.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2021" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2021/exch-2021.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220427_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220427_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220427_def.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/definitionLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPageCoverPage" roleURI="http://www.cna.com/role/CoverPageCoverPage">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Cover Page Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|August 5, 2005                                                                                 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-44 July 10, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 Victor Dricks

 NRC ASSESSMENT TEAM TO BEGIN WORK JULY 15 

 AT MAINE YANKEE PLANT; ENTRANCE MEETING OPEN TO PUBLIC

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Independent Safety

Assessment Team, which will examine the performance of the

Maine Yankee nuclear plant, will begin its work on site

Monday (July 15).

 The team will meet with officials of Maine Yankee Atomic

Power Company at 1 p.m. that day to discuss the scope of its

inspection. The meeting will be held in the Maine Yankee

Information Center at the plant site on Ferry Road and will

be open for public observation.

 The 24-member team will be on site at Maine Yankee July

15-26 and August 12-23.

 The independent assessment team reports to NRC Chairman

Shirley Ann Jackson and has a Commission-approved charter.

The team will assess how well Maine Yankee conforms to its

design and licensing basis. It will further examine the

plant's operational safety performance and will determine the

effectiveness of the utility's self-assessments, corrective

actions and improvement plans. In its report, which will be

issued in early October, the team will determine the safety

significance of its findings and draw conclusions about 

overall performance. 

 Edward L. Jordan, director of the NRC Office for

Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, is manager of

the assessment team. The team leader is Ellis Merschoff,

Director of the Division of Reactor Projects at NRC's

regional office in Atlanta. Team members include NRC

inspectors and specialists, representatives of the State of

Maine, and contractors from national laboratories and

independent consulting firms. 

 NRC will hold a public meeting in early October to

discuss the team's findings.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 16, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01417-CR 

KARIASA MACHELL THOMAS, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F13-58505-V 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown 

On May 22, 2015, appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss the appeal. A copy of the 

motion was sent to appellate counsel, who was directed to sign the copy if he concurred in 

appellant’s decision and return it to the Court. Rather than signing the copy and returning it to 

the Court, on May 28, 2015, counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, in which he states he 

conferred with appellant regarding her decision, and that he has confirmed appellant does desire 

to abandon her appeal. He attached a copy of appellant’s statement that she understood the 

consequences of dismissing her appeal, and agreed to counsel’s decision to withdraw. On May 

29, 2015, appellant filed a second pro se motion to dismiss her appeal. We will read these 
documents together to constitute a motion to dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a). 

The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and this 

decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

PER CURIAM 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

141417F.U05 
S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

KARIASA MACHELL THOMAS, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-01417-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F13-58505-V. 

Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief 

Justice Wright and Justices Myers and 

Brown. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Judgment entered June 16, 2015.
### §1771. Congressional declaration of purpose

In recognition of the demonstrated relationship between food and good nutrition and the capacity of children to develop and learn, based on the years of cumulative successful experience under the national school lunch program with its significant contributions in the field of applied nutrition research, it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress that these efforts shall be extended, expanded, and strengthened under the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture as a measure to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's children, and to encourage the domestic consumption of agricultural and other foods, by assisting States, through grants-in-aid and other means, to meet more effectively the nutritional needs of our children.

(Pub. L. 89–642, §2, Oct. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 885.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2022 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–129, §1, May 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 1225, provided that: "This Act [amending section 1786 of this title] may be cited as the 'Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022'."

#### Short Title of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–247, §1, June 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 2314, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 1792 of this title and provisions set out as notes under section 1792 of this title] may be cited as the 'Federal Food Donation Act of 2008'."

#### Short Title of 1992 Amendments

Pub. L. 102–512, §1, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3363, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 1769, 1776, and 1786 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 1769 and 1786 of this title] may be cited as the 'Children's Nutrition Assistance Act of 1992'."

Pub. L. 102–512, title I, §101, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3363, provided that: "This title [amending sections 1769 and 1776 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1769 of this title] may be cited as the 'Homeless Children's Assistance Act of 1992'."

Pub. L. 102–512, title II, §201, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3364, provided that: "This title [amending section 1786 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 1786 of this title] may be cited as the 'WIC Infant Formula Procurement Act of 1992'."

Pub. L. 102–314, §1, July 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 280, provided that: "This Act [amending section 1786 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 1786 of this title] may be cited as the 'WIC Farmers' Market Nutrition Act of 1992'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 89–642, §1, Oct. 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 885, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Child Nutrition Act of 1966'."
### Part A—Acquisition, Alteration, or Renovation of Multipurpose Senior Centers
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 1.53 [Reserved]
EPA ICR No. 2195.04 OMB Control No. 2070-0169

ATTACHMENT C

Sections 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) and 408(e)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act 

FFDCA Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii)

(b) AUTHORITY AND STANDARD FOR TOLERANCE.—

* * * *

(2) STANDARD.—

(A) GENERAL RULE.—

* * * *

(ii) DETERMINATION OF SAFETY.—As used in this section, the term “safe”, with 

respect to a tolerance for a pesticide chemical residue, means that the Administrator 

has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 

exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.

FFDCA Section 408(e)(1)(C)

(e) ACTION ON ADMINISTRATOR’S OWN INITIATIVE.—

(1) GENERAL RULE.—The Administrator may issue a regulation—

* * * *

(C) establishing general procedures and requirements to implement this section.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     March 21, 2012





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---




ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.


On March 21, 2012, the registrant issued a press release announcing that it has signed a definitive implementation agreement with Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited (“Hardy”) pursuant to which it will acquire all issued and outstanding common shares of Hardy by way of a merger under the Bermuda Companies Act for 280 UK pence per share, or, in the aggregate, approximately $227 million USD.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.


The merger is subject to Hardy shareholder and regulatory approvals and consents, as well as other customary terms and conditions.  The offer announcement disclosure document distributed pursuant to UK regulations is posted and available to review on the registrant's website at www.cna.com.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.








---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  March 21, 2012By/s/ Lawrence J. Boysen(Signature)Lawrence J. BoysenSenior Vice President andCorporate Controller








---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued March 21, 2012, announcing the execution of a definitive implementation agreement with Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited pursuant to which it will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited.
§ 230.132 Definition of “common trust fund” as used in section 3(a)(2) of the Act. The term *common trust fund* as used in section 3(a)(2) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) shall include a common trust fund which is maintained by a bank which is a member of an affiliated group, as defined in section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 1504(a)), and which is maintained exclusively for the collective investment and reinvestment of monies contributed thereto by one or more bank members of such affiliated group in the capacity of trustee, executor, administrator, or guardian, *Provided That:* ( a ) The common trust fund is operated in compliance with the same state and federal regulatory requirements as would apply if the bank maintaining such fund and any other contributing banks were the same entry; and
( b ) The rights of persons for whose benefit a contributing bank acts as trustee, executor, administrator, or guardian would not be diminished by reason of the maintenance of such common trust fund by another bank member of the affiliated group.
(15 U.S.C. 77s(a))
[43 FR 2392, Jan. 17, 1978]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00370-CV

In the Interest of R.J.V.R., a Child

On Appeal from the

377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-01-83880-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed, due to appellant’s

inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 17, 2020
| **Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                                         |           |           |   |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                                             | $ 0.35         | $ 0.30         | $ 2.70 | $ 2.60 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### §15923. Methodology

The Secretary of the Interior shall use the same assessment methodology across all geological provinces, areas, and regions in preparing and issuing national geological assessments to ensure accurate comparisons of geological resources.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §364(b), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 723.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM BILL F. ADAMS, JR., a/k/a Bill F. Adams, a/k/a William F. 

Adams,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

TOMMY SKEENS; JERRY SKEENS; RS MINING, INC.; ROBERT 

STINSON; TRUONG VAN NGUYEN,

Petitioners.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00044-JPJ-RSB-1; 1:16-cv-81186-

JPJ-RSB)

Submitted: September 25, 2018 Decided: October 2, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

William Bill F. Adams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

William Bill F. Adams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey President and Chief Executive
OfficerMay 7, 2008 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks