alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 13-089 October 28, 2013

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC Extends Public Comment Period for Proposed Rule and Environmental Study

on Extended Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is extending by three weeks, until December 20, the 

deadline for public comments on a proposed rule and supporting environmental study on the effects of 

extended storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond the licensed operating life of commercial reactors.

The NRC has also rescheduled the five public meetings on extended storage that were

postponed due to the government shutdown and will hold an additional teleconference to receive public 

input on Dec. 9. The rescheduled meetings will be held Nov. 12 in Oak Brook, Ill.; Nov. 18 in 

Carlsbad, Calif.; Nov. 20 in San Luis Obispo, Calif.; Dec. 2 in Perrysburg, Ohio; and Dec. 4 in 

Minnetonka, Minn. Additional details about the meetings, including information on how to register, can 

be found on the NRC website. NRC staff will also host a public status update teleconference on Oct. 

30. Details are on the website.

The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register September 13 for public comment

through Nov. 27. Known as “waste confidence,” the proposed rule would replace a similar provision in 

NRC’s environmental regulations that was vacated last year by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit. The rule does not authorize extended storage of spent fuel at reactor sites 

– a separate license is required for that. Rather, waste confidence is a generic finding of the 

environmental impacts of storing spent fuel for extended periods beyond the licensed operating life of 

reactors. The draft Waste Confidence Generic Environmental Impact Statement forms the regulatory 

basis for the proposed rule. The draft statement is available on the NRC’s waste confidence webpage.

Public comments may be submitted several ways: Online through the federal government’s 

rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov using Docket ID NRC-2012-0246; by e-mail to 

Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov; by fax to 301-415-1101; by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; 

or by hand delivery to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on 

federal workdays. 

Comments may also be provided orally or in writing at the public meetings, part of the agency’s 

extensive public outreach effort on the waste confidence project. All comments will be considered no 

matter how they are submitted.
#### Marathon Pictures Corporation, Appellant, v. PRC Pictures, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
§ 232.314 Accommodation for certain securitizers of asset-backed securities. The information required in response to Rule 15Ga-1 (§ 240.15Ga-1 of this chapter) by a municipal securitizer will be deemed to satisfy the electronic submission requirements of Rule 101 (§ 232.101 of this chapter) under the following conditions: ( a ) For purposes of this section, a municipal securitizer is a securitizer (as that term is defined in Section 15G(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is any State or Territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, any political subdivision of any State, Territory or the District of Columbia, or any public instrumentality of one or more States, Territories or the District of Columbia; and
( b ) The information required by Rule 15Ga-1 is provided to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board in an electronic format available to the public on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's Internet Web site.
[76 FR 4511, Jan. 26, 2011]
§ 230.153 Definition of “preceded by a prospectus” as used in section 5(b)(2) of the Act, in relation to certain transactions. ( a ) *Definition of preceded by a prospectus.* The term preceded by a prospectus as used in section 5(b)(2) of the Act, regarding any requirement of a broker or dealer to deliver a prospectus to a broker or dealer as a result of a transaction effected between such parties on or through a national securities exchange or facility thereof, trading facility of a national securities association, or an alternative trading system, shall mean the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Conditions.* Any requirement of a broker or dealer to deliver a prospectus for transactions covered by paragraph (a) of this section will be satisfied if: ( 1 ) Securities of the same class as the securities that are the subject of the transaction are trading on that national securities exchange or facility thereof, trading facility of a national securities association, or alternative trading system;
( 2 ) The registration statement relating to the offering is effective and is not the subject of any pending proceeding or examination under section 8(d) or 8(e) of the Act;
( 3 ) Neither the issuer, nor any underwriter or participating dealer is the subject of a pending proceeding under section 8A of the Act in connection with the offering; and
( 4 ) The issuer has filed or will file with the Commission a prospectus that satisfies the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act.
( c ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) The term *national securities exchange*, as used in this section, shall mean a securities exchange registered as a national securities exchange under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f).
( 2 ) The term *trading facility*, as used in this section, shall mean a trading facility sponsored and governed by the rules of a registered securities association or a national securities exchange.
( 3 ) The term *alternative trading system*, as used in this section, shall mean an alternative trading system as defined in Rule 300(a) of Regulation ATS under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 242.300(a) of this chapter) registered with the Commission pursuant to Rule 301 of Regulation ATS under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 242.301(a) of this chapter). [70 FR 44804, Aug. 3, 2005]

Cross References:
For the rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, see part 240 of this chapter. For general requirements as to prospectuses, see §§ 230.400-230.434a.
Page 2 

Attachment 

Summary of United Parcel Service Co Petition for 

Extension of Exemption Number 8658

United Parcel Service Co. (UPS), Operating Certificate IPXA097B, petitions the 

Administrator for an extension of Exemption Number 8658 E (Docket Number FAA2005-22336) which is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012. An extension to 

January 31, 2014 of this exemption will allow UPS a continuation of relief from 

§121.619(a)(1) and (2) in conducting domestic operations utilizing a different 

methodology to determine the need for naming a destination alternate airport. This 

exemption lowers the ceiling and visibility from 2000 feet and 3 statute miles to 1000 

feet and 2 statute miles for minimum weather forecast or other appropriate reports to 

not require the naming of a destination alternate. This is contingent upon the 

availability of a destination Category II approach, no forecast convective activity and 

certain flight monitoring capabilities.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Wilson                     August 14, 2007
-----------------------
David A. Wilson                              Date
Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.64 Judicial review.

The Congress has provided for review by the courts of the decisions and orders by this Commission. Members should recognize that their obligation to preserve the sanctity of the laws administered by them requires that they pursue and prosecute, vigorously and diligently but at the same time fairly and impartially and with dignity, all matters which they or others take to the courts for judicial review.
#### § 230.905 Resale limitations.

Equity securities of domestic issuers acquired from the issuer, a distributor, or any of their respective affiliates in a transaction subject to the conditions of § 230.901 or § 230.903 are deemed to be “restricted securities” as defined in § 230.144. Resales of any of such restricted securities by the offshore purchaser must be made in accordance with this Regulation S (§ 230.901 through § 230.905, and Preliminary Notes), the registration requirements of the Act or an exemption therefrom. Any “restricted securities,” as defined in § 230.144, that are equity securities of a domestic issuer will continue to be deemed to be restricted securities, notwithstanding that they were acquired in a resale transaction made pursuant to § 230.901 or § 230.904.

[63 FR 9647, Feb. 25, 1998]
Part 527 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights

Subpart 527.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts

527.306 Licensing background patent rights to third parties.

Subpart 527.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights

527.409 Contract clauses.

Parent topic: General Services Administration Acquisition Manual

Subpart 527.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts

527.306 Licensing background patent rights to third parties.

For a D&F for licensing to third parties, submit the D&F for the Administrator’s approval through

the SPE (see FAR 27.306).

Subpart 527.4 - Rights in Data and Copyrights

527.409 Contract clauses.

GSA has a FAR deviation that allows use of the clauses in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section in

lieu of the FAR clause at 52.227-17.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, insert 552.227-70, Government Rights

(Unlimited),in lieu of the FAR clause at 52.227-17, in solicitations and contracts for—

(1) Architect-engineer services.

(b)If the Government requires sole property rights and exclusive control over the design and data,

insert the clause at 552.227-71, Drawings and Other Data to Become Property of Government, in lieu

the clause at FAR 52.227-17 in solicitations and contracts for—

(1) Architect-engineer services.

(2) Construction contracts involving architect-engineer services.
MP5346.1 - GENERAL

Parent topic: MP5346 -Quality Assurance

MP5346.103 - Contracting Office Responsibilities

Revised: June 2023

The following mandatory procedures will be used when awarding services acquisitions unless the

three conditions at DFARS PGI 201.602-2(v)(A) are met.

1. Roles and Responsibilities

a. The COCO/Chiefs of Performance Management Offices must ensure that a:

(1) Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) is appointed and properly trained to integrate

the quality contract requirements into the quality assurance program, act as the liaison between the

contracting and functional organizations, and provide training and record keeping in accordance

with MP5301.602-2(d).

b. The CO must:

(1) Advise the acquisition team on Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan development.

(2) Designate Contracting Officer’s Representatives (COR) in accordance with MP5301.602-2(d)

c. The QAPC must:

(1) Successfully complete the QAPC course conducted by AETC prior to conducting any training.

(2) Support the acquisition team in the development of contract quality assurance requirements

specifically ensuring that requirements are clearly stated and enforceable.

(3) Assist the acquisition team during market research efforts in determining commercial quality

assurance practices.

(4) Assist, as required, with the evaluation of contractor Quality Control Plans.

(5) Successfully complete the Management of Subcontracting Compliance (CLC 059) course offered

by the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) A new requirement for 1102’s and CORs.
Subpart 3431.1—Applicability

Parent topic: PART 3431—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

3431.101 Objectives.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR

31.101.
Jonathan B. Hill T: +1 202 962 8356 jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM 

### March 1 2 , 2014 Paul L. Gretch Director Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: Streamlining Docket DOT - OST - 2005 - 22228 Dear Director Gretch : On behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”), please accept this letter as a request that the Department of Transportation (“Department”) add certain exemption authority to its consolidated certificate issu ed in Order 2009
- 9
- 4 in Docket DOT
- OST
- 2005
- 22228. J etBlue holds the requisite blanket open
- skies certificate. 1 

### The chart below sets forth the markets that JetBlue requests be added to its consolidated certificate for non
- limited entry markets. Non - limi ted Entry Markets Country - Routing Authority Order granting/renewing authority Docket
Any point in the United States to any point in the Cayman Islands Exemption NOAT on July 18, 2012 OST
- 2012
- 0115

Any point in the United States to any point in the Dominican Republic 2 Exemption NOAT on January 17, 2014 OST
- 2009
- 0342

1 DOT Order 2007
- 7
- 3. 2 JetBlue’s authority to provide foreign scheduled service between the United States and Santo Domingo and Santiago, Dominican Republic (Docket OST
- 2004
- 17265) and between New York (JFK) and Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic (Docket OST
- 2007
- 29358) already h as been included in its consolidated certificates. The Department’s January 17, 2014 NOAT expanded JetBlue’s exemption authority to provide scheduled combination service between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in the Dominican Republic.

### Paul L. Gretch March 12, 2014 Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

Any point in the United States to any point in Haiti Exemption NOAT on May 20, 2013 OST
- 2013
- 0099
Any point in the United States to any point in Turks and Caicos Exemption NOAT on August 2, 2012 OST
- 2010
- 0228



### JetBlue further requests, pursuant to Order 2009
- 12
- 21 3 

### that the Department remove point restrictions on the countries and routes already included in JetBlue’s consolidated certificate for non
limited entry markets . The chart below sets forth the markets it seeks to have broadened. Country - Routing Authority Order granting/renewing authority Dockets
United States to Bahamas Exemption NOAT on September 8, 2009 OST
- 2004
- 18796 United States to Bermuda Exemption NOAT on January 17, 2014 OST
- 2009
- 0342



### Should you have any questions concerning this application please contact me. Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

3 Order 2009
- 12
- 21 (Dec. 23, 2009).
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Syntax-Brillian Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: October 20, 2006 /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr. Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.    Chief Executive Officer
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0083:  Project Aim - Materials Program Evaluation

Accession Number: ML16148A800

Date Released: Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16148A826 - SECY-16-0083:  Project Aim - Materials Program Evaluation and Recommendation (16 page(s), 6/27/2016)
    - ML16148A841 - SECY-16-0083:  Enclosure - Project Aim - Materials Program Evaluation and Recommendation (21 page(s), 6/27/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §§1973cc–21 to 1973cc–26. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–410, title II, §203, Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 930

Section 1973cc–21, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §301, 69 Stat. 588, provided definitions of terms used in this subchapter. See section 20310 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

Section 1973cc–22, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §302, 69 Stat. 588, provided free postage for official post cards, ballots, voting instructions, and envelopes. See section 3406 of Title 39, Postal Service.

Section 1973cc–23, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §303, 69 Stat. 588, related to prevention of fraud and coercion.

Section 1973cc–24, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §304, 69 Stat. 589, provided that acts done in good faith do not constitute a violation of any provision of law relating to elective franchise.

Section 1973cc–25, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §305, 69 Stat. 589, provided that no undue influence be used by any officer but that nothing in this subchapter be deemed to prohibit free discussion regarding political issues or candidates for public office. See section 609 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 1973cc–26, act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 656, title III, §308, 69 Stat. 589, authorized appropriations as necessary to carry out this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 204 of Pub. L. 99–410, set out as an Effective Date note under section 20301 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### § 230.256 Definition of “qualified purchaser”.

For purposes of Section 18(b)(3) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(3)], a “qualified purchaser” means any person to whom securities are offered or sold pursuant to a Tier 2 offering of this Regulation A.

[80 FR 21895, Apr. 20, 2015]
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/    Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

May 12,2006

----
#### § 802.9 Acquisition solely for the purpose of investment.

An acquisition of voting securities shall be exempt from the requirements of the act pursuant to section 7A(c)(9) if made solely for the purpose of investment and if, as a result of the acquisition, the acquiring person would hold ten percent or less of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer, regardless of the dollar value of voting securities so acquired or held.

# Examples:

1. Suppose that acquiring person “A” acquires 6 percent of the voting securities of issuer X, valued in excess of $50 million (as adjusted). If the acquisition is solely for the purpose of investment, it is exempt under Section 7A(c)(9).

2. After the acquisition in example 1, “A” decides to acquire an additional 7 percent of the voting securities of X. Regardless of “A” 's intentions, the acquisition is not exempt under section 7A(c)(9).

3. After the acquisition in example 1, acquiring person “A” decides to participate in the management of issuer X. Any subsequent acquisitions of X stock by “A” would not be exempt under section 7A(c)(9).

[43 FR 33544, July 31, 1978, as amended at 66 FR 8693, Feb. 1, 2001; 70 FR 4994, Jan. 31, 2005]
#### In the Matter of the Petition of De Witt C. De Puy, Appellant, for the Purpose of Draining Certain Lands, under the Drainage Act,* and the Appointment of a Commission. The New York Central Railroad Company and Others, Respondents.

*

 See Drainage Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 15; Laws of 1909, chap. 20), as amd.—[Rep.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.