alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §13231. Public information program

The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate Federal agencies and individuals and organizations with practical experience in the production and use of alternative fuels and alternative fueled vehicles, shall, for the purposes of promoting the use of alternative fuels and alternative fueled vehicles, establish a public information program on the benefits and costs of the use of alternative fuels in motor vehicles. Within 18 months after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall produce and make available an information package for consumers to assist them in choosing among alternative fuels and alternative fueled vehicles. Such information package shall provide relevant and objective information on motor vehicle characteristics and fuel characteristics as compared to gasoline, on a life cycle basis, including environmental performance, energy efficiency, domestic content, cost, maintenance requirements, reliability, and safety. Such information package shall also include information with respect to the conversion of conventional motor vehicles to alternative fueled vehicles. The Secretary shall include such other information as the Secretary determines is reasonable and necessary to help promote the use of alternative fuels in motor vehicles. Such information package shall be updated annually to reflect the most recent available information.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title IV, §405, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2880.)
Exhibit 24.3

                          Consent of Austin M. O'Toole

       The consent of AUSTIN M. O'TOOLE, Esq., Senior Vice President and
Secretary of The Coastal Corporation, is contained in his opinion filed as
Exhibit 5 to this Registration Statement.
#### § 1.61 Injunctions.

In those cases where the Commission has reason to believe that it would be to the interest of the public, the Commission will apply to the courts for injunctive relief, pursuant to the authority granted in section 13 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

[40 FR 15233, Apr. 4, 1975]
§ 2.15 Orders requiring witnesses to testify or provide other information and granting immunity. ( a ) The Bureau Director, Deputy Directors, and Assistant Directors in the Bureaus of Competition and Economics, the Bureau Director, Deputy Directors and Associate Directors of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Regional Directors and Assistant Regional Directors are hereby authorized to request, through the Commission's liaison officer, approval from the Attorney General for the issuance of an order requiring a witness to testify or provide other information granting immunity under title 18, section 6002, of the United States Code.
( b ) The Commission retains the right to review the exercise of any of the functions delegated under paragraph (a) of this section. Appeals to the Commission from an order requiring a witness to testify or provide other information will be entertained by the Commission only upon a showing that a substantial question is involved, the determination of which is essential to serve the interests of justice. Such appeals shall be made on the record and shall be in the form of a brief not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length and shall be filed within five (5) days after notice of the complained of action. The appeal shall not operate to suspend the hearing unless otherwise determined by the person conducting the hearing or ordered by the Commission.
(18 U.S.C. 6002, 6004)
[37 FR 5016, Mar. 9, 1972, as amended at 48 FR 41375, Sept. 15, 1983; 61 FR 50645, Sept. 26, 1996]
§ 1018.42 Annual report. ( a ) The Advisory Committee Management Officer shall prepare an annual report on the Commission's advisory committees for inclusion in the President's annual report to Congress as required by section 6(c) of the Advisory Committee Act. This report shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with General Services Administration guidelines (39 FR 44814, December 27, 1974).
( b ) Results of the annual comprehensive review of advisory committee made under § 1018.43 shall be included in the annual report.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3861 

To name the front circle drive on the north side of the Oscar G. Johnson 

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility in Iron Mountain, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class James D. Priestap Drive’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2012 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the front circle drive on the north side of the 

Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility in Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class James D. Priestap Drive’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF THE FRONT CIRCLE DRIVE OF THE 

4 OSCAR G. JOHNSON DEPARTMENT OF VET5 ERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY, IRON 

6 MOUNTAIN, MICHIGAN. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3861 IH

1 (1) Sergeant First Class James D. Priestap 

2 was born on June 2, 1967, in Royal Oak, Michigan. 

3 (2) Priestap became a resident of the Foster 

4 City, Michigan, area in 1970 and graduated from 

5 North Dickinson High School in 1985. 

6 (3) He attended Ferris State University and 

7 Northern Michigan University. 

8 (4) Priestap joined the Navy as a rescue swim9 mer. 

10 (5) He later worked as a police officer at the 

11 Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs 

12 Medical Facility in Iron Mountain, Michigan. 

13 (6) While serving in the Michigan National 

14 Guard, he was assigned to the 46th Military Police 

15 Company in Kingsford, Michigan. 

16 (7) Priestap was deployed to Iraq on July 9, 

17 2006. 

18 (8) While on duty, Priestap was fatally shot at 

19 a checkpoint in Baghdad on Thanksgiving Day, No20 vember 23, 2006. 

21 (9) On December 3, 2006, Priestap was laid to 

22 rest with full military honors in his hometown of 

23 Foster City. 

24 (10) Priestap’s awards and decorations include 

25 the Bronze Star, the Purple Heart, the Navy, MaVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:47 Feb 02, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3861.IH H3861

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3861 IH

1 rine, and Army Achievement Medals, the Army Good 

2 Conduct Medal, the National Defense Medal, the 

3 Iraqi Campaign Medal, the Global War on Terror 

4 Expeditionary Medal, the Global War on Terror 

5 Service Medal, and the Combat Action Badge. 

6 (b) NAME OF DRIVE.—The front circle drive on the 

7 north side of the Oscar G. Johnson Department of Vet8 erans Affairs Medical Facility in Iron Mountain, Michi9 gan, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 

10 known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class James 

11 D. Priestap Drive’’. Any reference to such drive in any 

12 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

13 the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

14 to the Sergeant First Class James D. Priestap Drive. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §17771. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 110–422, title VI, §621, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4801, which related to Launch Services strategy, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 50903 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHistorical Perspective on Fast Coupled Loads Analysis MethodsSpacecraft structural designs are typically verified through a coupled loads analysis (CLA) process, which couples the spacecraft model with the launch vehicle (LV) model to predict low-frequency quasi-static and dynamic responses. The CLA calculations are typically the responsibility of the LV organization, but the spacecraft organization has a vested interest in being able to calculate approximate CLA results during the design of the spacecraft. Because of this, there has long been interest in a method that would allow a spacecraft organization to perform a CLA without access to the full set of LV models and forcing functions. One such method is the Norton-Thevenin Receptance Coupling (NTRC) approach, which is specifically designed to accurately transform LV free accelerations (no payload) into coupled system accelerations (LV plus payload). The purpose of this report is to provide historical context for the NTRC method and compare it with methods that have been used in the past. In particular, it is compared to a frequency-domain substitution method that had been used for a long period of time at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and a component-mode-based equivalent to that method.Document ID20180007921Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBlelloch, Paul A.*(ATA Engineering, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)*Allen, Matthew S.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 29, 2018Publication DateOctober 18, 2018Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-31696NASA/CR-2018-220101Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 869021.03.07.01.05CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA09CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180007921.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §15472. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15472 was editorially reclassified as section 21072 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of
Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H.Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                |  |                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III                       |  | Date: August 10, 2007
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III                           |  |                      
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          |  |                      
|    |  |                                               
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  | Date: August 10, 2007
|    |  | Mark H. Towe                                   |  |                      
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  |
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated:  1/14/2009
            
            /s/
      Richard LepikRichard
      LepikPrincipal
      Financial Officer
### §15971. Integrated coal/renewable energy system

#### (a) In general

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary may provide loan guarantees for a project to produce energy from coal of less than 7,000 Btu/lb. using appropriate advanced integrated gasification combined cycle technology, including repowering of existing facilities, that—

(1) is combined with wind and other renewable sources;

(2) minimizes and offers the potential to sequester carbon dioxide emissions; and

(3) provides a ready source of hydrogen for near-site fuel cell demonstrations.

#### (b) Requirements

The facility—

(1) may be built in stages;

(2) shall have a combined output of at least 200 megawatts at successively more competitive rates; and

(3) shall be located in the Upper Great Plains.

#### (c) Technical criteria

Technical criteria described in section 15962(b) of this title shall apply to the facility.

#### (d) Investment tax credits

#### (1) In general

The loan guarantees provided under this section do not preclude the facility from receiving an allocation for investment tax credits under section 48A of title 26.

#### (2) Other funding

Use of the investment tax credit described in paragraph (1) does not prohibit the use of other clean coal program funding.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §411, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 754.)
§ 10.103 Oral argument before the Commission. ( a ) *Request.* Any party may file with the Proceedings Clerk a request in writing for the opportunity to present oral argument before the Commission, which the Commission may in its discretion grant or deny. A request for oral argument must be made within the time provided for filing the initial briefs.
( b ) *Time allowed.* Unless otherwise directed by the Commission, not more than one-half hour will be allowed for oral argument by any participant. Where the same or similar interests are represented by more than one participant, an aggregate of not more than one-half hour will be allowed the interests so represented irrespective of the number of participants, the time to be divided equally among such participants or as they may agree among themselves. In appropriate cases the Commission may, in its discretion, extend, shorten or reallocate the time prescribed herein.
( c ) *Reporting and transcription.* Oral arguments before the Commission shall be reported and transcribed in written form unless the Commission shall direct otherwise.
( d ) *Commissioners not present at oral argument.* A member of the Commission who was not present at the oral argument may participate in the decision of the proceeding. Any Commissioner participating in the decision who was not present at the argument will review the transcript of argument.
[41 FR 2511, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 60 FR 54802, Oct. 26, 1995]
§ 201.701 Issuance of order. ( a ) At any time following conclusion of the rebuttal period specified in 17 CFR 201.700(c)(3)(i), the Commission may issue an order approving or disapproving the self-regulatory organization's proposed rule change together with a written statement of the reasons therefor.
( b ) At any time following conclusion of the rebuttal period specified in 17 CFR 201.700(c)(3)(ii), the Commission may issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed national market system plan or proposed amendment to an effective national market system plan together with a written statement of the reasons therefor.
[85 FR 65497, Oct. 15, 2020]
December 4, 2015 

The Honorable Kirsten E. Gillibrand 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Gillibrand: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter received October 26, 2015, posing a number of questions as follow-up to the 

October 7, 2015, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing. I appreciate the 

opportunity to provide you with additional information responsive to your interests. Answers to 

your specific questions are enclosed. 

 Since receipt of your letter, Entergy has announced it will be closing the James A. 

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant near Oswego, New York in late 2016 or early 2017. Please be 

assured that the NRC is committed to ensuring the continuing safe and secure operation and 

eventual safe and secure decommissioning of the FitzPatrick facility. 

If you need any additional information, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of 

the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3871 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3871

  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to preserve 
privilege for information submitted to the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
                              Protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2012

  Mr. Huizenga of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Bachus, and Mrs. Capito) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to preserve 
privilege for information submitted to the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
                              Protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Proprietary Information Protection 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE TO THE BUREAU DOES NOT AFFECT PRIVILEGE.

    Section 1022(c)(6) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5512(c)(6)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
                    ``(B) Privileges not affected by disclosure to the 
                bureau.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The submission by any 
                        person of any information to the Bureau for any 
                        purpose in the course of any supervisory or 
                        regulatory process of the Bureau shall not be 
                        construed as waiving, destroying, or otherwise 
                        affecting any privilege such person may claim 
                        with respect to such information under Federal 
                        or State law as to any person or entity other 
                        than the Bureau.
                            ``(ii) Rule of construction.--No provision 
                        of clause (i) may be construed as implying or 
                        establishing that--
                                    ``(I) any person waives any 
                                privilege applicable to information 
                                that is submitted or transferred under 
                                any circumstance to which clause (i) 
                                does not apply; or
                                    ``(II) any person would waive any 
                                privilege applicable to any information 
                                by submitting the information to the 
                                Bureau, but for this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 203.3 Suspension and disbarment.

The provisions of § 201.102(e) of this chapter (Rule 102(e) of the Commission's rules of practice) are hereby made specifically applicable to all investigations.

[29 FR 3620, Mar. 21, 1964, as amended at 60 FR 32823, June 23, 1995]
§ 802.5 Acquisitions of investment rental property assets. ( a ) Acquisitions of investment rental property assets shall be exempt from the requirements of the act.
( b ) Investment rental property assets. “Investment rental property assets” means real property that will not be rented to entities included within the acquiring person except for the sole purpose of maintaining, managing or supervising the operation of the real property, and will be held solely for rental or investment purposes. In an acquisition that includes investment rental property assets, the transfer of any property or assets that are not investment rental property assets shall be subject to the requirements of the act and these rules as if they were being acquired in a separate transaction. Investment rental property assets include: ( 1 ) Property currently rented,
( 2 ) Property held for rent but not currently rented,
( 3 ) Common areas on the property, and
( 4 ) Assets incidental to the ownership of property, which may include cash, prepaid taxes or insurance, rental receivables and the like.
Example: 1. “X”, a corporation, proposes to purchase a sports/entertainment complex which it will rent to professional sports teams and promoters of special events for concerts, ice shows, sporting events and other entertainment activities. “X” will provide office space in the complex for “Y”, a management company which will maintain and manage the facility for “X.” This acquisition is an exempt acquisition of investment rental property assets since “X” intends to rent the facility to third parties and is providing space within the facility to a management company solely to maintain, manage or supervise the operation of the facility on its behalf. If, however, “X” controls Z, a concert promoter to whom it also intends to rent the complex, the acquisition would not be exempt under § 802.5, since the property would not meet the requirements of § 802.5(b)(1). 2. “X” intends to buy from “Y” a development commonly referred to as an industrial park. The industrial park contains a warehouse/distribution center, a retail tire and automobile parts store, an office building, and a small factory. The industrial park also contains several parcels of vacant land. If “X” intends to acquire this industrial park as investment rental property, the acquisition will be exempt pursuant to § 802.5. If, however, “X” intends to use the factory for its own manufacturing operations, this exemption would be unavailable. The exemptions in § 802.2 for warehouses, rental retail space, office buildings, and undeveloped land may still apply and, if the value of the factory is $50 million (as adjusted) or less, the entire transaction may be exempted by that section.
[61 FR 13688, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended at 66 FR 8693, Feb. 1, 2001; 70 FR 4994, Jan. 31, 2005]