alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 230.161 Amendments to rules and regulations governing exemptions.

The rules and regulations governing the exemption of securities under section 3(b) of the Act, as in effect at the time the securities are first bona fide offered to the public in conformity therewith, shall continue to govern the exemption of such securities notwithstanding the subsequent amendment of such rules and regulations. This section shall not apply, however, to any new offering of such securities by an issuer or underwriter after the effective date of any such amendment, nor shall it apply to any offering after January 1, 1959, of securities by an issuer or underwriter pursuant to Regulation D or pursuant to Regulation A as in effect at any time prior to July 23, 1956.

[23 FR 4454, June 20, 1958]
§ 141.6 Written decision. ( a ) The hearing official shall issue a written opinion no later than 60 days after the hearing.
( b ) The written opinion will include a statement of the facts presented to demonstrate the nature and origin of the alleged debt; the hearing official's analysis, findings and conclusions; the amount and validity of the debt, and the repayment schedule.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71075-71076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (04-137)]


Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 1 et seq.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a 
NASA Earth Science and Applications From Space Strategic Roadmap 
Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with 
the performance of duties imposed upon

[[Page 71076]]

NASA by law. This determination follows consultation with the Committee 
Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: NASA Earth Science and Applications From Space 
Strategic Roadmap Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The Committee will advise the NASA 
Administrator on research and technology development to advance Earth 
observation from space, improvement of scientific understanding, and 
demonstration of new technologies with the potential to improve future 
operational systems. The Committee will draw on the expertise of its 
members and other sources to provide its advice and recommendations to 
the Agency. The Committee will hold meetings and make site visits as 
necessary to accomplish their responsibilities. The Committee will 
function solely as an advisory board and will comply fully with the 
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Lack of Duplication of Resources: The Committee's functions cannot 
be performed by the agency, another existing committee, or other means 
such as a public meeting.
    Fairly Balanced Membership: The Committee will consist of a balance 
of experts from within the government, private industry, and academia. 
In addition, there may be additional experts selected for Subcommittees 
or Task Forces. Members of the Committee, Subcommittee or Task Forces 
will be chosen from among industry, academia, and government with 
recognized knowledge and expertise in specific areas across the NASA 
portfolio. Total membership will reflect a fairly balanced view.
    Duration: Ad hoc.
    Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Marc Allen, Advanced Planning and 
Integration Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546, telephone (202) 358-2373.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26966 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
§ 229.909 (Item 909) Conflicts of interest. ( a ) Briefly describe the general partner's fiduciary duties to each partnership subject to the roll-up transaction and each actual or potential material conflict of interest between the general partner and the investors relating to the roll-up transaction.
( b ) ( 1 ) State whether or not the general partner has retained an unaffiliated representative to act on behalf of investors for purposes of negotiating the terms of the roll-up transaction. If no such representative has been retained, describe the reasons therefor and the risks arising from the absence of separate representation.
( 2 ) If an unaffiliated representative has been retained to represent investors: ( i ) Identify such unaffiliated representative;
( ii ) Briefly describe the representative's qualifications, including a brief description of any other transaction similar to the roll-up transaction in which the representative has served in a similar capacity within the past five years;
( iii ) Describe the method of selection of such representative, including a statement as to whether or not any investors were consulted in the selection of the representative and, if so, the names of such investors;
( iv ) Describe the scope and terms of the engagement of the representative, including, but not limited to, what party will be responsible for paying the representative's fees and whether such fees are contingent upon the outcome of the roll-up transaction;
( v ) Describe any material relationship between the representative or its affiliates and: ( A ) The general partner, sponsor, any affiliate of the general partner or sponsor; or
( B ) Any other person having a material interest in the roll-up transaction, which existed during the past two years or is mutually understood to be contemplated and any compensation received or to be received as a result of such relationship;
( vi ) Describe in reasonable detail the actions taken by the representative on behalf of investors; and
( vii ) Describe the fiduciary duties or other legal obligations of the representative to investors in each of the partnerships.
#### § 204.62 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Debt* or *delinquent nontax debt* means any money, funds or property that has been determined to be owed to the Commission by an individual that has not been paid by the date specified in the demand or order for payment, or applicable agreement. For purposes of this subpart, the terms “debt” and “claim” are synonymous.

*Disposable pay* means that part of the debtor's compensation (including, but not limited to, salary, bonuses, commissions, and vacation pay) from an employer remaining after the deduction of health insurance premiums and any amounts required by law to be withheld. For purposes of this subpart, “amounts required by law to be withheld” include amounts for deductions such as social security taxes and withholding taxes, but do not include any amount withheld pursuant to a court order.

*Employer* means a person or entity that employs the services of others and that pays their wages or salaries. The term employer includes, but is not limited to, State and local Governments, but does not include an agency of the Federal Government.

*Garnishment* means the process of withholding amounts from an employee's disposable pay and the paying of those amounts to a creditor in satisfaction of a withholding order.

*Withholding order* means any order for withholding or garnishment of pay issued by an agency, or judicial or administrative body. For purposes of this subpart, the terms “wage garnishment order” and “garnishment order” have the same meaning as “withholding order.”
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Derek Watson, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Columbia Care Inc.; and 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 25, 2022
/s/ Derek Watson
Derek WatsonChief Financial Officer**
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26675]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541)

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated 
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published 
regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title 45 part 670 
of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of 
permit applications received.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by January 5, 2005. 
This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit 
Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy at the above address 
or (703) 292-7405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed 
by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541), as amended 
by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, has 
developed regulations for the establishment of a permit system for 
various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain animals and 
certain geographic areas a requiring special protection. The 
regulations establish such a permit system to designate Antarctic 
Specially Protected Areas.
    The applications received are as follows:
    1. Applicant: Permit Application No. 2005-017, Peter Doran Earth 
and Environmental Sciences (MC186), University of Illinois at Chicago, 
Chicago, IL 60607.

Activity for Which Permit Is Requested

    Take. The applicant plans to collect bone samples from mummified 
penguins and seals located on the ice surface of the Dry Valley lakes. 
The radiocarbon dates of the bones may help to determine the age of the 
lake ice covers.

Location

    Taylor Valley Lakes.

Dates

    December 1, 2004 to February 15, 2005.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 04-26675 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
§ 232.309 Paper size; binding; sequential numbering; number of copies. ( a ) Requirements as to paper size, binding, and sequential page numbering shall not apply to electronic format documents.
( b ) An electronic format document, submitted in the manner prescribed by the EDGAR Filer Manual, shall satisfy any requirement that more than one copy of such document be filed with or provided to the Commission.
### §1870a. Buy-American requirements

#### (a) Award of contracts

The Director shall, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with current law, award to domestic firms any contracts for the purchase of goods and services intended for direct use by the Foundation.

#### (b) Report

The Director shall, as soon as possible after October 31, 1988, prepare a report on—

(1) the number of Foundation contracts entered into with foreign firms in fiscal year 1988;

(2) the number of such contracts entered into with domestic firms in that fiscal year;

(3) the number of contracts entered into with foreign firms where the Foundation also received a technically acceptable bid from a domestic firm; and

(4) any steps the Foundation will take to increase the number of contracts awarded to domestic firms.

Such report shall be submitted to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Labor and Human Resources and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

#### (c) Definitions

For the purposes of this section—

(1) the term "domestic firm" means a business entity which is organized under the laws of the United States or the laws of a State, district, commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and which conducts business operations in the United States; and

(2) the term "foreign firm" means a business entity not described in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 100–570, title I, §111, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2869.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of Senate changed to Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of Senate by Senate Resolution No. 20, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 19, 1999.
### §1992. Speedy trial

Whenever the President has reason to believe that offenses have been, or are likely to be committed against the provisions of section 1990 of this title or of section 5506 to 5516 and 5518 to 5532 of the Revised Statutes, within any judicial district, it shall be lawful for him, in his discretion, to direct the judge, marshal, and United States attorney of such district to attend at such place within the district, and for such time as he may designate, for the purpose of the more speedy arrest and trial of persons so charged, and it shall be the duty of every judge or other officer, when any such requisition is received by him to attend at the place and for the time therein designated.

(R.S. §1988; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 5506 to 5510, 5516 to 5519 and 5524 to 5535 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, were repealed by act Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §341, 35 Stat. 1153; section 5506, 5511 to 5515, and 5520 to 5523, also referred to in text, were repealed by act Feb. 8, 1894, ch. 25, §1, 28 Stat. 37. The provisions of sections 5508, 5510, 5516, 5518 and 5524 to 5532 of the Revised Statutes were reenacted by act Mar. 4, 1909, and classified to sections 51, 52, 54 to 59, 246, 428 and 443 to 445 of former Title 18, Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure. Those sections were repealed and reenacted as sections 241, 242, 372, 592, 593, 752, 1071, 1581, 1583 and 1588 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, in the general revision of Title 18 by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 683.

#### Codification

R.S. §1988 derived from act Apr. 9, 1866, ch. 31, §8, 14 Stat. 29.

Section was formerly classified to section 54 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, effective Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney". See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes thereunder.
#### § 201.620 [Reserved]
April 28, 2016 

The Honorable Thomas R. Carper 

Ranking Member, Committee on Homeland 

 Security and Governmental Affairs 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Carper: 

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of March 24, 2016, seeking additional information regarding the NRC’s work on advanced 

nuclear reactors. Responses to your specific information requests are enclosed. 

The recent interest in developing advanced reactor technologies (defined herein as nonlight-water reactors or “non-LWRs”) has prompted renewed focus from both the commercial sector 

and the NRC on the regulatory approach for licensing these new technologies. As I have said on 

numerous occasions, and as you note in your letter, the NRC can license these new technologies 

using our existing regulatory framework. This approach would continue to ensure safe, secure, 

and environmentally responsible uses of nuclear power. However, the NRC is also considering the 

extent to which enhancements to the existing framework could increase the efficiency, timeliness, 

and predictability of such reviews. 

Consistent with available NRC resources, the NRC is pursuing a multi-part strategy to 

prepare the NRC to conduct efficient and timely reviews of non-LWR technologies. This strategy 

emphasizes the following: (1) enhancing our regulatory infrastructure and processes to be able to 

conduct efficient reviews of non-LWR technologies, consistent with our safety, security, and 

environmental responsibilities; (2) improving our technical readiness to conduct the reviews; and 

(3) engaging our various stakeholders to provide them timely and relevant information and to make 

sure we understand their diverse needs and interests. I would be pleased to share our strategy 

with you when it is complete; I expect it to be available sometime this summer. 

Also as you note in your letter, the Government Accountability Office has reported that the 

overall development costs for a new reactor could reach $1 to $2 billion. It is important to note that 

the costs directly attributable to the NRC’s regulatory review efforts are only a small portion of this 

total. However, we recognize the importance of developing and implementing a regulatory review 

process that is efficient and does not impose unnecessary financial or schedule burdens. 

Thank you for your continuing interest in the NRC’s activities; I hope the information I have 

enclosed is useful to you. If you need any additional information, please contact me or Eugene 

Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: The Honorable Ron Johnson
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3668 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3668

              To prevent trafficking in counterfeit drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2011

    Mr. Meehan (for himself and Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To prevent trafficking in counterfeit drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Counterfeit Drug Penalty Enhancement 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COUNTERFEIT DRUG PREVENTION.

    Section 2320(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Counterfeit drugs.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Whoever commits an offense in 
                violation of paragraph (1) with respect to a drug (as 
                defined in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
                Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)) shall--
                            ``(i) if an individual, be fined not more 
                        than $4,000,000, imprisoned for not more than 
                        20 years, or both; and
                            ``(ii) if a person other than an 
                        individual, be fined not more than $10,000,000.
                    ``(B) Multiple offenses.--In the case of an offense 
                by a person under this paragraph that occurs after that 
                person is convicted of another offense under this 
                paragraph, the person convicted--
                            ``(i) if an individual, shall be fined not 
                        more than $8,000,000, imprisoned for not more 
                        than 20 years, or both; and
                            ``(ii) if other than an individual, shall 
                        be fined not more than $20,000,000.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3)(B), as redesignated, by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1) or (2)''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be 
construed to apply to a drug (as defined in section 201 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)) solely because the drug 
is manufactured in or imported from a foreign country.
                                 <all>
```
### §1882. Information furnished to Congressional committees

Notwithstanding any other provision of this or any other Act, the Director of the National Science Foundation and the National Science Board shall keep the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives fully and currently informed with respect to all of the activities of the National Science Foundation.

(Pub. L. 96–44, §9, Aug. 2, 1979, 93 Stat. 335; Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §109(i), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 890; Pub. L. 103–437, §15(c)(2), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4591.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–44, known as the National Science Foundation Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1980. For classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the authorization act cited as the credit to this section, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in the following prior authorization acts:

Pub. L. 95–434, §7, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1050.

Pub. L. 95–99, §11, formerly §13, Aug. 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 835, renumbered §11, Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §109(h), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 890.

Pub. L. 94–471, §11, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2058.

Pub. L. 94–86, §11, Aug. 9, 1975, 89 Stat. 431.

Pub. L. 93–413, §7, Sept. 4, 1974, 88 Stat. 1095.

Pub. L. 93–96, §9, Aug. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 317.

Pub. L. 91–120, §6, Nov. 18, 1969, 83 Stat. 203.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Science, Space, and Technology" for "Science and Technology".

1985—Pub. L. 99–159 inserted "and the National Science Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of Senate changed to Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of Senate by Senate Resolution No. 20, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 19, 1999.