alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

d0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

146666(98)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146666

COA: 300952

Wayne CC: 10-004178-02-FC

MARTEZ ROMAL BICKHAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 29, 2013 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
### §13882. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13882 was editorially reclassified as section 12242 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
No: IV-16-020 October 3, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Power Resources, Inc.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Power Resources, 

Inc., of Casper, Wyo., documenting actions that the company has agreed to take to ensure it maintains 

complete and accurate records of radiation surveys of personnel exiting its facilities.

The order formalizes commitments company officials made to the NRC following an 

investigation of activities at the company’s North Butte facility in Campbell County, Wyo. The NRC 

preliminarily determined that a former operations supervisor falsified a record of exit surveys that was 

supposed to be conducted on Sept. 12, 2013. In fact, the surveys required by NRC regulations were not 

conducted.

The company requested the Alternative Dispute Resolution process to resolve differences with 

the NRC concerning the issue and to discuss corrective actions. The process uses a neutral mediator 

with no decision-making authority to assist the NRC and its licensees in coming to an agreement. 

Following a meeting on Sept. 22 with company officials, the NRC issued a Confirmatory Order

documenting actions the company has agreed to. Power Resources will: (1) conduct annual meetings 

among key management, radiation safety officers, facility managers and other appropriate technical 

personnel to emphasize the importance of compliance with NRC regulations and ensure the accuracy of 

records; (2) ensure that it has a qualified member of its health physics staff available at any of its 

facilities when equipment is being released from a radiologically controlled area to an unrestricted area; 

and (3) provide additional training for new employees and supplemental annual refresher training.
Addendum 1 to Variable Incentive Pay Plan



 Exhibit 10.41.2 
 Addendum 1 
 to the 
 Synplicity Variable Incentive Pay Plan 
 Eligibility of Employees of Swedish
Subsidiary 
 WHEREAS, Synplicity, Inc. (the “Company”) has a wholly owned Swedish subsidiary called Synplicity AB, and that Synplicity AB has
a wholly owned Swedish subsidiary called Hardi Electronics AB (“Hardi”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company would like to include current and future
employees of Hardi (or any successor organization to Hardi) in its Variable Incentive Pay Plan (“VIPP”); 
 NOW, THEREFORE: 
 1. Employees of Hardi are eligible to participate in the VIPP as of June 11, 2007, unless otherwise stated in their employment contract, provided
they meet the eligibility criteria set out in the VIPP, including the exclusion of those employees who receive commission pay, but not the criteria of those who work less than full time, defined as 30 or more hours a week. All Hardi employees,
including those scheduled to work fewer than 30 hours per week, are eligible to participate in the VIPP, except those who receive commission pay. 
 2. Payment of the VIPP to employees of Hardi is subject to Swedish labor laws in regards to employment, dispute resolution and applicable statutory payments, taxes, and fees. All other terms and conditions of the VIPP apply. 
 3. Employees of the Swedish entity will receive payment through the Hardi payroll, as their employment contract terms stipulate. VIPP payments will be
paid through Hardi accounting processes and follow the usual and customary practices of the Hardi employee payroll. 
 4. This Addendum also
applies to employees of any successor organization to Hardi owned by Synplicity AB, whether such successor organization is due to name change, change of corporate structure, or the like, without further action.
j9 MINISTERIO

rS DE FOMENTO Si

FAX

FROM:

TO:

Strategic and Policy. Head of Department

Mr. Raúl Medina Caballero

Director, Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

Mr. Paul Gretch

Fax: 1 202 366 6780

SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DE

TRANSPORTES

DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE

AVIACIÓN CIVIL

SUBDIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE

TRANSPORTE AÉREO

SUBJEC: TAG AVIATION ESPAÑA NON-SCHEDULED AIR SERVICES TO/FROM THE UNITED

STATES

S/REF:

N/REF: vz

FECHA: 8 July 2011

NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS

ONE:

Dear Mr. Gretch,

Reg.

With reference to the intentions of TAG Aviation España to conduct non-scheduled air services

to/from the United States based on fifth freedom traffic rights, the Spanish Civil Aviation Authority

hereby confirms that similar requests submitted by United States air carriers will be treated on

the basis of reciprocity.

Raúl Medina Caballero

Deputy Directorate General for Air Transport

Correo electrónico:

fax TAG Aviation julio 2011

P° DE LA CASTELLANA, 67

28071 MADRID

TEL: 91 597 81 40

FAX: 91 597 86 43

EN CASO DE PROBLEMAS EN LA RECEPCIÓN. POR FAVOR LLAME A NUESTRAS OFICINAS.
516.603-70 Additional limitations on the use of letter contracts for architect-engineer (A-E) services under the PBS Design Excellence Program. 		    (a)                   *Requirement for a price proposal*. The proposed A-E must provide a price proposal for the non-design effort before the award of a letter contract. In accordance with FAR 52.216-25, a complete price proposal is required before definitization. 				         				         					          (b)                   *Contents of each letter contract*. The contracting officer must include the following information in the letter contract: 					           						             							              (1)  The scope. The scope of the letter contract must authorize only the A-E to perform those services that are independent of the design effort (for example, feasibility studies, existing facility surveys or site investigation, etc.). The A-E shall not begin any design effort before the letter contract is definitized for the entire scope of the project. 						             						             							              (2)  A definitization schedule. Include dates for each of the following: 							               								                 									                  (i)  Submission of the design fee proposal. 								                 								                 									                  (ii)  Start of negotiations. 								                 								                 									                  (iii)  Definitization. This date must be no later than 120 days after the date of the letter contract. 								                 							               						             						             							              (3) The letter contract must comply with FAR 16.6. 						             					           				         				         					          (c)                   *Unilateral price decision*. If the contracting officer issues a unilateral price decision, the maximum contract amount must not exceed a reasonable price for the excludable items plus the six percent statutory fee limitation for the project. 	  **Parent topic:** 516.603 Letter contracts.
#### § 308.9 Rulemaking review.

No later than four years after the effective date of this Rule, the Commission shall initiate a rulemaking review proceeding to evaluate the operation of the rule.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Meeting Summary for Fuel Cycle Cyber Security Public Meeting to Discuss the Draft Regulatory Basis

Accession Number: ML15306A267

Date Released: Thursday, January 12, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15292A021 - September 23, 2015, Summary of Public Meeting Cyber Security. (5 page(s), 11/9/2015)
    - ML15306A271 - NRC Slide Presentation for Public Discussions Regarding the Draft Regulatory Basis for the Fuel Cycle Cyber Security Proposed Rulemaking. (5 page(s), 9/23/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 23.433 Communications—fair dealing.

With respect to any communication between a swap dealer or major swap participant and any counterparty, the swap dealer or major swap participant shall communicate in a fair and balanced manner based on principles of fair dealing and good faith.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Blakeslee, Charles Broderick and Thomas Sokolski, Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgments of conviction affirmed. Appeal from order dismissed as academic. All concur as to affirmance of judgments of conviction except McCurn, P. J., and Wheeler, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the indictment, in the following memorandum: The pinball machines were, in our *1213opinion, erroneously admitted in evidence. In each instance the evidence claimed to connect the defendant with the machine was a police *“*recovered property report.” The report described the machine by a license number which in each instance corresponded with the license number issued to the particular defendant. It was assumed that the licenses were in some way attached to the respective machines, although there is no evidence that such is the fact. There is evidence in the record that these licenses were not issued to apply to any particular machine and were transferred from túne to time from one machine to another. No presumption of ownership or control arises from such a license. Moreover, the police recovered property report in each instance was offered and received in evidence with the express understanding that it was not for the purpose of establishing ownership or control. The tavern keepers who testified against each of the defendants were accomplices, and, in our view of it, the testimony of no one of them was corroborated, as required by section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Appeal from judgments of Brie Trial Term, convicting defendants Blakeslee, Broderick, Sokolski and others of the crime of keeping slot machines in violation of section 982 of the Penal Law. The order disallowed the demurrer to the indictment.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 199-200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10656]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Botticelli: Heroines + Heroes'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Botticelli: Heroines + Heroes,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston, 
Massachusetts, from on or about February 14, 2019, until on or about 
May 19, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be

[[Page 200]]

determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3809690879a9c9dc1c7c6cab38087928796dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aeddcbcddac7c1c09c9a9b97eedddacfdacb80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-24 of January 
8, 2019.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2019-00083 Filed 1-18-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 603.1 Cross-reference.

The rules formerly at 16 CFR part 603 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR 1022.3, “Fair Credit Reporting (Regulation V).”
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.13a-20 Plain English presentation of specified information. ( a ) Any information included or incorporated by reference in a report filed under section 13(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 402, 403, 404 or 407 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.402, § 229.403, § 229.404 or § 229.407 of this chapter) must be presented in a clear, concise and understandable manner. You must prepare the disclosure using the following standards: ( 1 ) Present information in clear, concise sections, paragraphs and sentences;
( 2 ) Use short sentences;
( 3 ) Use definite, concrete, everyday words;
( 4 ) Use the active voice;
( 5 ) Avoid multiple negatives;
( 6 ) Use descriptive headings and subheadings;
( 7 ) Use a tabular presentation or bullet lists for complex material, wherever possible;
( 8 ) Avoid legal jargon and highly technical business and other terminology;
( 9 ) Avoid frequent reliance on glossaries or defined terms as the primary means of explaining information. Define terms in a glossary or other section of the document only if the meaning is unclear from the context. Use a glossary only if it facilitates understanding of the disclosure; and
( 10 ) In designing the presentation of the information you may include pictures, logos, charts, graphs and other design elements so long as the design is not misleading and the required information is clear. You are encouraged to use tables, schedules, charts and graphic illustrations that present relevant data in an understandable manner, so long as such presentations are consistent with applicable disclosure requirements and consistent with other information in the document. You must draw graphs and charts to scale. Any information you provide must not be misleading.
( b ) [Reserved]
Note to § 240.13 a
-20:
In drafting the disclosure to comply with this section, you should avoid the following: 1. Legalistic or overly complex presentations that make the substance of the disclosure difficult to understand; 2. Vague “boilerplate” explanations that are imprecise and readily subject to different interpretations; 3. Complex information copied directly from legal documents without any clear and concise explanation of the provision(s); and 4. Disclosure repeated in different sections of the document that increases the size of the document but does not enhance the quality of the information.
[71 FR 53261, Sept. 8, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 976, Jan. 4, 2008]
Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of The Coastal Corporation on Form S-8 relating to The Coastal
Corporation 1998 Incentive Stock Plan of (i) our report dated February 3, 1998
(February 13, 1998 as to Note 15), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of The Coastal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997, and (ii) to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in this Registration Statement.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Houston, Texas
February 5, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


               Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer


      The undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of United Community
Bankshares of Florida, Inc. does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that to the best of my knowledge, the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of United Community Bankshares
of Florida, Inc.


                                          /s/ David G. Powers
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          David G. Powers
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

      Date: August 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to United Community
Bankshares of Florida, Inc. and will be furnished by United Community Bankshares
of Florida, Inc. and first to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### §12651j. Assignment to State Commissions

#### (a) Assignment

In accordance with section 12651d(c)(1) of this title, the Chief Executive Officer may assign to State Commissions specific programmatic functions upon a determination that such an assignment will increase efficiency in the operation or oversight of a program under the national service laws. In carrying out this section, and before executing any assignment of authority, the Corporation shall seek input from and consult Corporation employees, State Commissions, State educational agencies, and other interested stakeholders.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 2 years after the effective date of the Serve America Act, the Corporation shall submit a report to the authorizing committees describing the consultation process described in subsection (a), including the stakeholders consulted, the recommendation of stakeholders, and any actions taken by the Corporation under this section.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §196B, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1708, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the effective date of the Serve America Act, referred to in subsec. (b), as Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
### §17157. Review and evaluation

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may review and evaluate the performance of any eligible entity that receives a grant under the program, including by conducting an audit, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

#### (b) Withholding of funds

The Secretary may withhold from an eligible entity any portion of a grant to be provided to the eligible entity under the program if the Secretary determines that the eligible entity has failed to achieve compliance with—

(1) any applicable guideline or regulation of the Secretary relating to the program, including the misuse or misappropriation of funds provided under the program; or

(2) the energy efficiency and conservation strategy of the eligible entity.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §547, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1674.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Clarification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.87 
  
 CLARIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF 
 AGREEMENT REGARDING CONVERSION OF PROMISSORY NOTE 
  
 THIS CLARIFICATION AND MODIFICATION OF PROMISSORY NOTE hereby amends and supplements that certain AGREEMENT REGARDING CONVERSION OF PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 29, 2005, by and between Biovest
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Biovest”), and the undersigned (“Holder”) as follows: 
  
 Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby modified by adding the following sentence to the end of said paragraph: “The conversion described in this paragraph will occur
at the time and upon the conditions set forth in paragraph 2 below, and such conversion will occur automatically and without any further action on the part of the Holder or Biovest.” 
  
 Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: “The automatic conversion of the principal and all
accrued interest under the Convertible Promissory Notes pursuant to Paragraph 1 above shall occur on the date which is the earlier of (a) thirty (30) days after the closing of the initial underwritten public offering of Accentia
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. or (b) December 1, 2005. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such conversion shall be conditioned on the following: (i) Biovest’s common stock must be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board as of the date of
conversion, and (ii) the Holder shall not have previously converted such Convertible Promissory Notes into common stock of Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Inc pursuant to the terms of such notes. Upon such conversion, all principal and accrued but
unpaid interest through the date of conversion shall be deemed to have been automatically and irrevocably paid in full.” 
  
 All other terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This Clarification and Modification shall be deemed to be effective as of September 27,
2005. 
  

							
	BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	HOLDER
				
	By:	 	  

	 	Signature:	 	  


	 Name:
 Title:
	 	 	 	Name:	 	  


	 	 	 	 	 
				
	 	 	 	 	Signature:	 	  


				
	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	  


			
	 ACCENTIA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 (assenting
to both the Agreement and this Clarification and Modification)
	 	 	 	 
				
	By:	 	  

	 	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title: