alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
POWER OF ATTORNEY     Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each  of Susan A. Stone and Stathy Darcy, signing singly, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney- in-fact to:    (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an  officer and/or director of CNA Financial Corporation (the “Company”), Forms 3, 4,  and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  the rules thereunder; and    (2)    do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be  necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5,  complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file  such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any  stock exchange or similar authority; and    (3)   take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing  which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best  interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the  documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned  pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such  terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in- fact’s discretion.    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to  do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be  done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and  purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of  substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such  attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this  power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges  that the forgoing attorney-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned,  are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned’s responsibilities to  comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    This Power of Attorney shall supersede any existing power of attorney and shall remain  in full force and effect until a successor power of attorney is executed or the undersigned is no  longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned’s holdings of and  transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in  a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be  executed as of this 25th day of July, 2023.              /s/ Jane E. Possell        _________________________        Name: Jane E. Possell
#### § 239.17 [Reserved]
§ 201.601 Prompt payment of disgorgement, interest and penalties. ( a ) *Timing of payments.* Unless otherwise provided, funds due pursuant to an order by the Commission requiring the payment of disgorgement, interest, or penalties shall be paid no later than 21 days after service of the order, and funds due pursuant to an order by a hearing officer shall be paid in accordance with the order of finality issued pursuant to § 201.360(d)(2).
( b ) *Stays.* A stay of any order requiring the payment of disgorgement, interest or penalties may be sought at any time pursuant to § 201.401.
( c ) *Method of making payment.* Payment shall be made by United States postal money order, wire transfer, certified check, bank cashier's check, or bank money order made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The payment shall be mailed or delivered to the office designated by this Commission. Payment shall be accompanied by a letter that identifies the name and number of the case and the name of the respondent making payment. A copy of the letter and the instrument of payment shall be sent to counsel for the Division of Enforcement.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13180, Mar. 19, 2004; 70 FR 72570, Dec. 5, 2005]
### §1445. Repealed. Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 690, §4(1), 69 Stat. 625

Section, act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title VI, §612, 63 Stat. 444, related to striking or subversive employees of the Housing and Home Finance Agency and the Department of Agriculture, withholding of their wages, and penalties. See sections 3333 and 7311 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and section 1918 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
#### Julia C. Harle, Appellant, v. Henry Hamburg et al., Appellees.

Gen. No. 19,964.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. L. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed December 31, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

The hill filed in this case contained, in substance, - the same allegations as in the case of *Huguley v. Ham*
      *29
      *burg,*reported on p. 21, *ante.*A general demurrer was sustained to the bill and the decision in that case held controlling.

Lewis, Folsom & Streeter and J. G. Grossberg, for appellant.

Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellees; Walter H. Jacobs and Charles J. McFadden, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:32 PM To: David Moore Subject: RE: Cooper Environmental



### David,

I have not talked to Dr. Fine yet but I expect to t alk to him within the next few days. Are you able to share a publicly-releasable copy of the quote you recently prepared for the Nigeria stack installation? Mr. K rag Petterson previously offered to share one with me but I haven ’t received it yet.

Thanks,

-David

David Ogulei, Ph.D., P.E. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division | AR-18J 77 West Jackson Blvd. | Chicago, Illinois 60604 Phone: (312) 353-0987 | Fax: (312) 692-2080 Ogulei.David@epa.gov

From: David Moore [mailto:DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com ] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 2:13 PM To: Ogulei, David Subject: Cooper Environmental

Hello David,

I just wanted to follow up to see if you were able to communicate with Dr. Fine at South Coast AQMD re garding our Xact systems in stack applications. Do you require any additional information from us?

Best regards,

David Moore Director of Sales and Marketing Cooper Environmental Services LLC 10180 SW Nimbus Ave. Suite J6 Portland, OR 97223 Phone #: 503-608-4444 Mobile #: 503-970-8190
Fax #: 503-624-2120 Email: DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com Website: www.cooperenvironmental.com
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of William McChesney Martin, Jr.

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Eighty-Fourth Congress, 1955-1957. 						*Nomination of William McChesney Martin, Jr. : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Eighty-Fourth Congress, Second Session, January 20 and 27, 1956*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 20 and 27, 1956,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5334,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
First Amendment to Special Long-Term Restricted Stock Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and between Albert R.
Ginn, Jr., a resident of the State of Texas (“Grantee”), and NCI Building Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of the date fully executed by both parties as set forth below. 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties to this Amendment have entered into that certain
Restricted Stock Agreement, dated May 28, 2004 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company awarded to Grantee a special, long-term grant of restricted stock; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Section 16 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended by a written agreement signed by both
the Company and Grantee; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to
amend the Agreement as herein set forth; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the
parties hereto hereby approve and adopt this Amendment as follows: 
  
 1. Section 4(a)(ii) of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “(ii) by the Company without Cause or by Grantee’s voluntary resignation with Good Reason before all of the Awarded Shares
become vested Awarded Shares, all of the Unvested Awarded Shares shall vest as of the Termination Date.” 
  
 2. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
  
 3. Unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment,
including the above preambles, shall have the same meanings ascribed to those terms in the Agreement. 
  
 4. Any reference in the Agreement to the “Agreement” shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below.

  

	
	
	/s/    ALBERT R. GINN,
JR.        
	Albert R. Ginn, Jr.
	
	 Date: October 24, 2005



  

			
	NCI BUILDINGS SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/    FRANCES R. POWELL        
	 	 	Frances R. Powell
	 	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	
	 Date: October 24, 2005
Petition	for	Exemption 																																																																								 					July	9,2015																																			

Transformed	Images,	Saratoga	NY

743	Plank	Rd

Clifton	Park	NY,	12065

Ryan	Triller	

Cell:	(518)- 545-9462

Paul	Andreoli

Cell:	(518)-265-3590

Transformed.images@gmail.com

Section	333	Exemption

Transformed	Images from	Saratoga	NY	is	seeking	exemption	for	section	333.	

Our	company	mission	statement	is	to provide	the	general public	as	well	as	the	

commercial	market	with	high	quality	aerial photography	and	imaging	using	two	

primary	platforms.	The	two	platforms	that	we	currently	use	are	the	DJI	Phantom	2	

plus	and	the	DJI	S-1000.	

Our	PIC	has	over	20,000	hours	of	experience	with	various	pod	and	boom	

platforms	as	well	as	multi-rotors.	All platforms	are	inspected	and	thoroughly	

checked	before	and	after	each	session	of	flight.	Batteries	and	sub	equipment are	

kept	up	to	date,	along	with	all	software	for	each	platform’s	stabilization	as	well	as	

GPS	software.

Both	the	PO	and	AO	will	be accompanied	by	an	observer to	guaranty	the	safe	

operation in	compliance	with	LOS.	Conditions are	also	taken	into	consideration;

weather	along	with	the	well	being	of	the	AO	and	PO	is always	taken	into	account	

before	operation. All	platforms	have	been	applied	with	failsafe	procedures	in	order	

to	assure	the	safe	operation	of	the	platform	during	the	job.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3852 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow a deduction for 

amounts paid or incurred by a responsible party relating to a discharge 

of oil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow 

a deduction for amounts paid or incurred by a responsible party relating to a discharge of oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR AMOUNTS PAID 

4 OR INCURRED BY A RESPONSIBLE PARTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

7 (q) as subsection (r) and by inserting after subsection (p) 

8 the following new subsection: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3852 IH

1 ‘‘(q) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF A RESPONSIBLE

2 PARTY.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be al4 lowed under subsection (a) for any amount paid or 

5 incurred by a responsible party relating to any inci6 dent resulting in the discharge of oil into the navi7 gable waters, other than an incident caused by an 

8 act of God or an act of war. 

9 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—Any term used in para10 graph (1) which is also used in the Oil Pollution Act 

11 of 1990 shall have the meaning given such term by 

12 such Act.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to returns of tax the due date of 

15 which (including extensions of time) is after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §17753. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 110–422, title VI, §603, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4796, which related to contingency plan for cargo resupply of the International Space Station, and required contingency plan to be delivered to congressional committees no later than one year after Oct. 15, 2008, was omitted from the Code following the enactment of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314.
Subpart 509.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors 	  **Parent topic:** Part 509 - Contractor Qualifications509.105 Procedures. 	  509.105-1 Obtaining information. 		    FAR 9.105-1 lists a number of sources of information that a contracting officer may utilize before making a determination of responsibility. The contracting officer may request information directly from a prospective contractor using GSA Form 527, Contractor's Qualifications and Financial Information, but only after exhausting other available sources of information.509.105-2 Determinations and documentation. 		    (a)  The contracting officer shall provide written notification to a prospective contractor determined not responsible. Include the basis for the determination. Notification provides the prospective contractor with the opportunity to correct any problem for future solicitations. 				         				         					          (b)  Due to the potential for de facto debarment, the contracting officer shall avoid making repeated determinations of nonresponsibility based on the same past performance information. 				         				         					          (c)  To provide for timely consideration of the need to institute action to debar a contractor, the contracting officer shall submit a copy of each nonresponsibility determination, other than those based on capacity or financial capability, to the Suspension and Debarment Official in the Office of Acquisition Policy.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., thesole Manager of Vestin Fund III, LLC, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vestin Fund III, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Fund III, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin FundIII, LLC and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinFund III LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-4798;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund III, LLC’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Fund III, LLC’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affectVestin Fund III LLC’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Fund III, LLC’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Fund III, LLC’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Fund III,LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. ShustekChief Executive Officer*Vestin Mortgage, Inc., soleManager of Vestin Fund III, LLC
* Michael V. Shustek functions as the equivalent of the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the registrant
(October 27, 1953.)

#### In the Matter of Ivan Warner et al., Respondents, against James M. Power et al., Respondents, and Ira J. Palestin et al., Appellants. In the Matter of James J. Lyons et al., Respondents, against James M. Power et al., Respondents, and Ira J. Palestin et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Ivan Warner et al., Appellants, against James M. Power et al., Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

On their face the nominating petitions of appellants, Ira J. Palestin, *et al.*contained enough valid signatures to meet the requirements of section 138 of the Election Law for an independent nominating petition. The learned Special Referee bases his decision upon a finding that “the use of the so-called Independent Party was a mere vehicle to place the Liberal Party’s candidates on a second line on the ballots”. There is no support in any provision of the Election Law for a holding that the petition under attack is void because of its sponsorship or the manner in which it was procured. The determination of the learned Special Referee insofar as it invalidated the nominating petitions of Ira J. Palestin *et al.*should be reversed and the applications of appellants Warner *et al.*herein should be dismissed. (See *Matter of Rosett*v. *Heffernan,*187 Misc. 598, affd. 271 App. Div. 784, affd. 296 N. Y. 695.) Settle order.

Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ., concur.

Order unananimously reversed and the application of Ivan Warner *et al.*is dismissed. Settle order on notice.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 2, 2017

jam 

# Order

Clerk August 2, 2017

1 56114 ( 21 )

MICHAEL LEON POWELL

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 56114

COA: 337498

OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN and DIRECTOR OF

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pa y to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 2 .00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until th e payments equal the balance due of

$3 73 .00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
#### Muscular Dystrophy Associations of America, Inc., Respondent, v. National Foundation for Muscular Dystrophy, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously modified to eliminate all of the items of examination except items 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 29 and otherwise provide for examination as to defendant’s promotional and solicitation activities, programs and materials. The books and records required to be produced upon the examination will be those relevant to the matters of inquiry allowed. The order is further modified to provide only for the examination in the first instance of Ruth Berini, defendant’s executive director, and David L. Wilkoff, chairman of defendant’s board of directors. As so modified the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Jeremiah Higgins, Deceased. Ellen M. Driscoll, Respondent; Margaret Sawyer, Appellant.

All concur. (The order grants proponent’s motion for a bill of particulars.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Part 518 [Reserved]

Parent topic: General Services Administration Acquisition Manual