alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[115th Congress Public Law 377]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5114]]

Public Law 115-377
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize the Traumatic Brain Injury program. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 
                         2018 -  [H.R. 6615]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Traumatic Brain 
Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2018. 42 USC 201 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Traumatic Brain Injury Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF INJURIES.

    Part J of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280b 
et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 393C (42 U.S.C. 280b-1d) by adding at the end 
        the following:

    ``(c) <<NOTE: Determination.>>  National Concussion Data Collection 
and Analysis.--The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention, may implement concussion data 
collection and analysis to determine the prevalence and incidence of 
concussion.'';
            (2) in section 394A(b)(42 U.S.C. 280b-3(b)), by striking 
        ``$6,564,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019'' and 
        inserting ``$11,750,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 
        2024''; and
            (3) by striking section 393C-1 (42 U.S.C. 280b-1e).
SEC. 3. STATE GRANTS FOR PROJECTS REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN 
                    INJURY.

    Section 1252 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-52) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, acting through the 
        Administrator for the Administration for Community Living,'' 
        after ``The Secretary'';
            (2) by striking subsection (e);
            (3) by redesignating subsections (f) through (j) as 
        subsections (e) through (i), respectively; and
            (4) in subsection (i), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``$5,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 2015 through 2019'' 
        and inserting ``$7,321,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 
        2024''.
SEC. 4. STATE GRANTS FOR PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES.

    Section 1253 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-53) is 
amended--

[[Page 132 STAT. 5115]]

            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, acting through the 
        Administrator for the Administration for Community Living,'' 
        after ``The Secretary''; and
            (2) in subsection (l), by striking ``$3,100,000 for each of 
        the fiscal years 2015 through 2019'' and inserting ``$4,000,000 
        for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6615 (S. 3657):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 18, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Dec. 19, House concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
### §14616. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14616 was editorially reclassified as section 40316 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
February 4, 2010 wa

Today’s R-134a is a greenhouse gas that is targeted for phase out in Europe starting next year. As part of 

the US Clean Air Act that resulted in the phase-out of CFC-12 and controlled it’s use to only certified 

service personnel its replacement R-134a use was not controlled. 

The uncontrolled sale of R-134a in the US resulted in the atmospheric loading of this high global warming 

chemical providing international reason to eliminate its future use.

Productions of new vehicles using HFC-134a systems were first introduced in MY1992 and full production 

MY1995. The US Clean Air Act required that refrigerant Recovery Recycle service equipment was 

mandatory. These new HFC-134a systems incorporated new technologies to reduce refrigerant 

emissions therefore required minimal refrigerant for servicing the fleet in that time period. 

In the October 12, 2001 Executive Summary of Technologies to Reduce Emissions of NonCO2Greenhouse Gases and Black Carbon National Climate Change Technology Initiative (NCCTI), data 

from the EPA Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1999 and 2000 indicated high 

emission levels for HFC-134a. In 1998 an unexplained HFC-134a emissions, accountable to MAC service 

industry, of an additional 14,000 equivalent metric tonnes of carbon dioxide or 31 million pounds of HFC134a was reported.

Since the sale of CFC-12 was restricted to service professionals, HFC-134a was used to service the 

leaking MAC CFC-12 fleet estimated by R.L. Polk to be 159.4 million in 1992 and 13.7 million in 1998, 

therefore impacting the high R-134a atmospheric loading.
Part 5334 - Major System Acquisition

DAFFARS PART 5334 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5334.2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

5334.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause

Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS

5334.7002 Policy

Subpart 5334.2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

5334.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause

If an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) waiver is obtained in accordance with the Adaptive

Acquisition Framework Document Identification Tool (AAFDID) EVMS Application Requirements

Table, contracting officers may omit the use of EVMS provisions and clauses prescribed for use in

DFARS 234.203. The approved EVMS waiver must be included in the contract file.

Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON

SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS

5334.7002 Policy

(d)(4) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period(s) covered in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October 29, 2009 |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Richard M. Lavers   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Richard M. Lavers       |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Brillian
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Wayne A. Pratt, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Wayne A. Pratt                               
| |  |                                                  
| |  | Wayne A. Pratt                                   
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer

November 12, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.10b-21 Deception in connection with a seller's ability or intent to deliver securities on the date delivery is due. Preliminary Note to § 240.10 b
-21:
This rule is not intended to limit, or restrict, the applicability of the general antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, such as section 10(b) of the Act and rule 10b-5 thereunder.
( a ) It shall also constitute a “manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance” as used in section 10(b) of this Act for any person to submit an order to sell an equity security if such person deceives a broker or dealer, a participant of a registered clearing agency, or a purchaser about its intention or ability to deliver the security on or before the settlement date, and such person fails to deliver the security on or before the settlement date.
( b ) For purposes of this rule, the term *settlement date* shall mean the business day on which delivery of a security and payment of money is to be made through the facilities of a registered clearing agency in connection with the sale of a security.
[73 FR 61677, Oct. 17, 2008]
§ 148.28 Appeal to the Commission. ( a ) Either the applicant or counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency may appeal the initial decision on the fee application by complying with the requirements of this section. An appealing party shall serve upon opposing parties and shall file with the Proceedings Clerk a notice of appeal within fifteen (15) days after service of the initial decision. The notice need consist only of a brief statement indicating the filing party's intent to appeal the initial decision, and shall include the date upon which the initial decision was rendered, the name of the proceeding, and the docket number of the proceeding. The failure of a party timely to file and serve a notice of appeal in accordance with this paragraph, or to perfect the appeal in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, shall constitute a voluntary waiver of any objection to the initial decision, and of all further administrative or judicial review under these rules and the Equal Access to Justice Act.
( b ) An appeal shall be perfected by the appealing party by timely filing with the Proceedings Clerk an appeal brief which meets the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section. An original and one copy of the appeal brief shall be filed within thirty (30) days after filing of the notice of appeal. By motion of the appealing party, the Commission may, for good cause shown, extend the time for filing the appeal brief. If the appeal brief is not filed within the time prescribed in this subparagraph, the Commission may, upon its own motion or upon motion by a party, dismiss the appeal, in which event the initial decision shall become the final decision and order of the Commission, effective upon service of the order of dismissal.
( c ) The opposing party may, within thirty (30) days after service of the appeal brief, file an original and one copy of an answering brief, and serve one copy thereof, unless the time limit is extended by the Commission upon motion of the party and for good cause shown.
( d ) Parties filing an appeal brief or answering brief shall meet the requirements of § 10.12 of this chapter as to form. The content of briefs shall satisfy the requirements of § 10.102(d) of this chapter, except that any party, with leave of the Commission, may file an informal document in lieu of a brief. No brief shall exceed thirty-five (35) pages in length without advance leave of the Commission.
( e ) On review, the Commission may, in its discretion, consider *sua sponte* any issues arising from the record and may base its determination thereon, or limit the issues to those presented in the statement of issues in the briefs, treating those issues not raised as waived.
[51 FR 18881, May 23, 1986]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropic Communications, Inc. (the Registrant), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of October 28, 2010.



|                                                                                  |  |  |  |                                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick Henry                                                                 |  |  |  | /s/ David Lyle                                                  
|Patrick Henry President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  | David Lyle Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This Certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Registrant made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this Report, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates this
Certification by reference therein.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2018

No. 04-17-00704-CV

Russell J.G. AMSBERRY,

Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17196

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Neither appellant nor appellee requested oral argument in their respective original briefs.

In fact, in his original brief, appellant specifically stated, “[t]his case is governed by well 

recognized legal standards such that oral argument is not necessary to resolve this matter.”

Accordingly, this court notified the parties the appeal would be submitted on briefs. On August 

6, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion to Reconsider Denial of Oral Argument.” The motion is 

opposed by appellee. After review, we DENY appellant’s motion to reconsider denial of oral 

argument.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
529.470 Domestic contract clauses.

(a)Insert the clause at 552.229-70, Federal, State, and Local Taxes, in solicitations and contracts

estimated to exceed the micro-purchase threshold, but not the simplified acquisition threshold.

(b)Insert the clause at 552.229-71, Federal Excise Tax—DC Government, in solicitations and

contracts that allow the District of Columbia Government to place orders under the contract.

Parent topic: Subpart 529.4 - Contract Clauses
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superlattice Power, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ayaz Kassam, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Ayaz KassamChief
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial
Officer





December
12, 2008
Oil Drilling

Robert Bond to: Nick Parsons 08/02/2010 03:13 PM

Dear Mr. Parsons,

 We in our family have been long time residents of SaLt Lake City 

having moved here in 1971. We are becoming increasingly concerned 

about the degraded quality of air in our city . Because of that we are 

not in favor of increased drilling for oil in our state or in 

Colorado. It is our firm persuasion that we need to be seeking ways 

to reduce our oil consumption rather that promoting increased use .

 Also, we are disturbed about the considerable negative effects of 

drilling on the environment.

 We DO NOT CONDONE FURTHER OIL DRILLING THAT WILL CONTRIBUTE TO 

DECREASING OUR AIR QUALITY.

 Thank you.

Georgene Bond, RN

Robert E. Bond, MD
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.Glenn M. Parker, M.D.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) Date: November 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Bryan HappBryan HappChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
- Table of Contents
- Help with the 1940 Census
#### §§ 230.651-230.656 [Reserved]
1834.203-70 NASA solicitation provision and

contract clause.

Except for firm-fixed price contracts and the contracts identified in 1834.201(c), the contracting

officer shall insert—

(a) The provision at 1852.234–1, Notice of Earned Value Management System, in solicitations for

contracts for—

(1) Development or production, including flight and ground support projects, and institutional

projects (facility, IT investment, etc.), with a value exceeding $20M; and

(2) Acquisitions of any value designated as major by the project manager in accordance with OMB

Circular A–11; and

(b) The clause at 1852.234–2, Earned Value Management System, in solicitations and contracts with

a value exceeding $50M that include the provision at 1852.234–1. The contracting officer shall use

the clause with its Alternate I when the contract value is less than $50M.

Parent topic: Subpart 1834.2—Earned Value Management System
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George W. Schlicter, Appellant.

The record does not establish any violation of section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. *People*v. *Elliott,*66 App. Div. 179, affd. 172 N. Y. 146.) We are of the opinion that defendant’s guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt and that the claims of error advanced by him are without merit. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3860 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the responsibilities of 

small businesses with respect to the employment and reemployment rights 

of veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2012 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself and Mr. RUSH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the responsibilities of small businesses with respect to the employment and reemployment rights of veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Veterans Return 

5 to Work Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3860 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESSES AND VETERANS’ EMPLOYMENT 

2 RIGHTS. 

3 (a) UNDUE HARDSHIP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.— 

4 Section 4312(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ‘‘if such 

7 employer is a small business concern’’ before the 

8 semicolon; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘if such 

10 employer is a small business concern’’ after ‘‘on the 

11 employer’’. 

12 (b) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.—Section 4303 of 

13 such title is amended by adding at the end the following 

14 new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(17) The term ‘small business concern’ has 

16 the meaning given that term under section 3 of the 

17 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70281-70282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ANSI Accredited Standards Committee ``C8''

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ANSI Accredited Standards 
Committee ``C8'' (``C8 Committee''), by its Secretariat, National 
Electrical Manufacturers Association (``NEMA''), has filed written 
notification simultaneously with the

[[Page 70282]]

Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notification were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI 
Accredited Standards Committee ``C8'', Rosslyn, VA. The nature and 
scope of the C8 Committee's standards development activities are: To 
develop and maintain American National Standards (``ANSI'') related to 
wire and cable products.
    Currently, C8 Committee maintains 38 standards relating to high 
performance wire, power cables, and communications cable and wire. The 
standards developed by C8 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26621 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M