alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 703.4 Qualification of members. ( a ) No member deciding a dispute shall be: ( 1 ) A party to the dispute, or an employee or agent of a party other than for purposes of deciding disputes; or
( 2 ) A person who is or may become a party in any legal action, including but not limited to class actions, relating to the product or complaint in dispute, or an employee or agent of such person other than for purposes of deciding disputes. For purposes of this paragraph (a) a person shall not be considered a “party” solely because he or she acquires or owns an interest in a party solely for investment, and the acquisition or ownership of an interest which is offered to the general public shall be prima facie evidence of its acquisition or ownership solely for investment.
( b ) When one or two members are deciding a dispute, all shall be persons having no direct involvement in the manufacture, distribution, sale or service of any product. When three or more members are deciding a dispute, at least two-thirds shall be persons having no direct involvement in the manufacture, distribution, sale or service of any product. “Direct involvement” shall not include acquiring or owning an interest solely for investment, and the acquisition or ownership of an interest which is offered to the general public shall be prima facie evidence of its acquisition or ownership solely for investment. Nothing contained in this section shall prevent the members from consulting with any persons knowledgeable in the technical, commercial or other areas relating to the product which is the subject of the dispute.
( c ) Members shall be persons interested in the fair and expeditious settlement of consumer disputes.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3998 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mr. BARROW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for certain expenses of elementary and 

secondary school teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND SEC4 ONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNT.—Subpara6 graph (D) of section 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue 

7 Code of 1986 (relating to certain expenses of elementary 

8 and secondary school teachers) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘$250’’ and inserting ‘‘$500’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3998 IH

1 (b) EXTENSION.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

2 62(a)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘during 

3 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 

4 or 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘after December 31, 2001, and 

5 before January 1, 2014’’. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN ITI AL REVI E W E NG I NEER I NG REPORT PMN : 15

- 0 1 4 1

Focu s Ready Draf t 1 /29/20 1 5

Pos t f ocus act i vi ti e s for bringConsumer U s e : Yes
SA T (concer n s) ( 1 2/23/ 2 0 14 ) : R e l ated A

n a l ogs : Migra t b l e P B T ra ti ng : P 1 B 1 T 1 H

ea l t h : 2 Inh a l a ti on E co : 2 W a t er (A l l re l ease s to wate r w i t h a CC (Testi n g desired) 390 ppb)

, XB T es ti ngOCC U PAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RAT I NG : 2D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPT I ONS :IN I T I AL REVI E W E NG I NEER I NG REPORT
PMN : 1 5

- 014 1IN I T I AL REVI E W E NG I NEER I NG REPORT
PMN : 1 5

- 014 1IN I T I AL REVI E W E NG I NEER I NG REPORT
PMN : 1 5

- 014 1
#### Peter Zapryluk, Respondent, v. Phillippine Milau, as Administratrix of the Estate of Rudolph Milau, Deceased, Appellant.

*757The judgment was entered on October 9,1931. There is no denial of the allegation in the affidavits submitted by plaintiff that there was an agreement, executed by him, whereby he was to pay $200 and transfer back to defendant’s husband an interest in the partnership of which the deceased was a member, in consideration for a satisfaction and discharge of the judgment entered on the confession of the plaintiff. Neither is there any denial of the allegation that no proceeding was commenced to enforce payment of the judgment until November, 1950, after the death of the defendant’s husband, which occurred in 1939. To avoid multiplicity of proceedings, the plaintiff could apply for a declaration of the rights of the parties when the defendant asserted the judgment had not been paid by instituting the proceedings to obtain payment. The right to seek a declaratory judgment arose when defendant asserted the right to enforce the judgment. Therefore, the Statute of Limitations is no defense. Neither does the former judgment preclude the maintenance of this action. There the plaintiff sought to cancel the confession of judgment and the judgment on the ground that they resulted from fraud on the part of the deceased. Here the judgment and confession are not attacked. Plaintiff relies on an agreement made after the entry of the judgment. The provision for security, however, should not have been deleted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 886; *Pine*v. *Conran Co.,*268 App. Div. 783.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
No: 16-048 August 8, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Names David Nelson as Chief Information Officer

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named technology 

veteran David J. Nelson as Chief Information Officer. His start date has 

yet to be finalized. 

“David’s lengthy experience with the government’s use of 

information technology will help the NRC keep pace with today’s 

interconnected world,” said Victor McCree, Executive Director for 

Operations. “We’re glad to have him on board.”

Nelson comes to the NRC from his role as CIO and Director, 

Office of Enterprise Information at the Centers for Medicare and 

Medicaid Services (CMS), part of the Department of Health and Human 

Services. He was selected to help lead the recovery of Healthcare.gov 

and oversaw the technology backbone for services such as Medicare 

claims processing. Nelson managed the Centers’ $2.6 billion portfolio of applications, trusted data 

exchanges and other information technology.

Nelson joined CMS in 2004, filling senior positions such as Director, Office of Information 

Services; Director, Office of Enterprise Management; and Director, Data Analytics and Control Group 

for the Center for Program Integrity. Prior to joining CMS, Nelson’s private sector experience includes 

co-founding two broadband development companies providing access to underserved U.S. markets. He 

served in the U.S. Air Force, and holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Management from the 

University of Phoenix.
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Qsb of Twin
Ventures Ltd. for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2004, I, Graeme F. Scott, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Twin Ventures Ltd. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended March 31, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TWIN
          VENTURES LTD.

Dated:    May 14, 2004

TWIN VENTURES LTD.


By:  /s/ Graeme F. Scott
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--RapidIO Trade Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), RapidIO Trade Association 
(``RapidIO'') had filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: RapidIO Trade 
Association, Austin, TX. The nature and scope of RapidIO's standards 
development activities are: To direct the future development and drive 
the adoption of the RapidIO architecture. The RapidIO Interconnect 
Architecture, designed to be compatible with the most popular 
integrated communications processors, host processors, and networking 
digital signal processors, is a high-performance, packet-switched, 
interconnect technology.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27060 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
gpo123786
**Exhibit 10.20****AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING NOTE**THIS AMENDMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of this 30th day of March, 2007 by andbetween ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP., a Colorado corporation, having an office at 700Seventeenth Street, Suite 1200, Denver, Colorado 80202 (“Maker”) and BOCO INVESTMENTS, LLC, aColorado limited liability company, having an office at 103 West Mountain Ave., Fort Collins,Colorado 80524 (“Holder”).WITNESSETH:WHEREAS, Maker has executed and delivered to Holder a Revolving Note dated September 28, 2006(the “Note”) to evidence Maker’s indebtedness to Holder in the principal amount of Three MillionFive Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00); andWHEREAS, Maker and Holder wish to further subordinate the Note to a credit facility to beextended to Maker by United Western Bank and otherwise modify certain terms and provisions of theNote;NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth herein above, and for other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, intendingto be legally bound, the parties hereto do hereby mutually and expressly understand and agree asfollows:1. Definitions. The definition of the term “Senior Debt” appearing in Section 5,entitled “Definitions,” of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:“Senior Debt” means all indebtedness, obligations and otherliabilities of the Company to (i) Vectra Bank Colorado, nationalassociation, pursuant to that certain First Amendment to CreditAgreement dated August 3, 2006, as amended, and (ii) United WesternBank (“UWB”) pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement dated March30, 2007 between UWB and Maker, as the same may be amended,modified, restated or extended from time to time, and any otherindebtness in replacement or subordination to Vectra Bank or UnitedWestern Bank as may be approved by Holder in writing from time totime.2. Subordination. The words “principal and” appearing in line ten of Section 2,entitled “Subordination,” of the Note are hereby deleted.3. Representations and Warranties. Maker hereby represents and warrants, and Holderhereby acknowledges and agrees, that (a) no default has occurred under the Note, (b) except asprovided herein, the Note has not been modified or amended, and (c) the executionand delivery of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of the partieshereto.
 

 
4. Ratification. Except as modified by this Agreement, all of the terms of the Noteare ratified and reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect.5. Inurement. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon andshall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.6. Governing Law. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by theapplicable laws of the State of Colorado.[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have each caused this Agreement to be executed by theirrespective duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written.           MAKER:           ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.,
§ 23.206 Delegation of authority to the Director of the Market Participants Division to establish an alternative compliance schedule to comply with daily trading records. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates to the Director of the Market Participants Division or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate, the authority to establish an alternative compliance schedule for requirements of § 23.202 that are found to be technologically or economically impracticable for an affected swap dealer or major swap participant that seeks, in good faith, to comply with the requirements of § 23.202 within a reasonable time period beyond the date on which compliance by such swap dealer or major swap participant is otherwise required.
( b ) A request for an alternative compliance schedule under this section shall be acted upon by the Director of the Market Participants Division within 30 days from the time such a request is received, or it shall be deemed approved.
( c ) Relief granted under this section shall not cause a registrant to be out of compliance or deemed in violation of any registration requirements.
( d ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, in any case in which a Commission employee delegated authority under this section believes it appropriate, he or she may submit to the Commission for its consideration the question of whether an alternative compliance schedule should be established. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated in this section.
[77 FR 20202, Apr. 3, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 71810, Sept. 4, 2024]
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

October 25, 2016 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M161018 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON STRATEGIC 

PROGRAMMATIC OVERVIEW OF THE DECOMMISSIONING 

AND LOW-LEVEL WASTE AND SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND 

TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS LINES, 9:30 A.M., TUESDAY, 

OCTOBER 18, 2016, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, 

ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN 

TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on strategic considerations associated with the 

Decommissioning and Low-Level Waste, and Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Business 

Lines. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### §15386. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15386 was editorially reclassified as section 20986 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
132 STAT. 5052 PUBLIC LAW 115–345—DEC. 21, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1733: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–457 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Dec. 12, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–345 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the energy 

and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL. 

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with the Administrator 

of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget, shall— 

(1) review and update the report prepared pursuant to 

section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005; 

(2) after consultation with relevant Federal, State, and 

local agencies and affected industry and stakeholder groups, 

update data that was used in preparing that report; and 

(3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordinated Federal 

strategy to increase the beneficial reuse of used lubricating 

oil, that— 

(A) is consistent with national policy as established 

pursuant to section 2 of the Used Oil Recycling Act of 

1980 (Public Law 96–463); and 

(B) addresses measures needed to— 

(i) increase the responsible collection of used oil; 

(ii) disseminate public information concerning 

sustainable reuse options for used oil; and 

(iii) promote sustainable reuse of used oil by Federal agencies, recipients of Federal grant funds, entities 

contracting with the Federal Government, and the general public. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Public 

information. 

Strategy. 

Consultation. 

Data. 

Deadline. 

Cooperation. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 1733] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
### Part C—Certain Programs Regarding Mental Health and Substance Use

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title I, §1241(b)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5678, substituted "Substance Use" for "Substance Abuse" in part heading.

Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIV, §3404(1), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1220, added part C heading and struck out former part C heading "Certain Programs Regarding Substance Abuse".
EXHIBIT 31.1

<PAGE>

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Kelly Kendall, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this amended  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Life USA,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this amended  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
amended quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this amended  quarterly  report,  fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows
of the  registrant  as of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in this  amended
quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this amended quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this amended  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
amended  quarterly  report  whether there were  significant  changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 10, 2004


/s/ Kelly Kendall
------------------------
 Kelly Kendall, CEO & CFO
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00172-CV

MYERS-WOODWARD, LLC

v.

UNDERGROUND SERVICES MARKHAM, LLC AND

UNITED BRINE PIPELINE COMPANY LLC

On Appeal from the

130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-E-0218

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded in 

part, and reversed and rendered in part, and affirmed in part. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED IN PART, REVERSED AND 

RENDERED IN PART, and AFFIRMED IN PART. Costs of the appeal will be taxed 

against the party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 16, 2022
### §13722. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13722 was editorially reclassified as section 12122 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 323.1 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) The term *Made in the United States* means any unqualified representation, express or implied, that a product or service, or a specified component thereof, is of U.S. origin, including, but not limited to, a representation that such product or service is “made,” “manufactured,” “built,” “produced,” “created,” or “crafted” in the United States or in America, or any other unqualified U.S.-origin claim.
( b ) The terms *mail order catalog* and *mail order promotional material* mean any materials, used in the direct sale or direct offering for sale of any product or service, that are disseminated in print or by electronic means, and that solicit the purchase of such product or service by mail, telephone, electronic mail, or some other method without examining the actual product purchased.
#### Aaron Weisberg et al., Respondents, v. Central Greyhound Lines of N. Y., Inc., Appellant, and Carol Newman, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Elizabeth Newman et al., Respondents, v. Central Greyhound Lines of N. Y., Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

—Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion for consolidation granted. The convenience of the parties and the court would best be served by consolidation of the actions. Action No. 1 should be consolidated with action No. 2, under the calendar number already assigned to action No. 2. Unless *1023plaintiffs in both actions should otherwise agree among themselves, plaintiffs in action No. 2 shall have the right to open and close. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.