alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2
                                                                         Summary



                                Guaranty Contract

Guaranty  Contract  Entered by and between  Shenzhen Nanshan Branch of Guangdong
Development  Bank ("the  Creditor")  and Shenzhen  BAK Battery Co.,  Ltd. (" the
Guarantor ") dated January 11th, 2006.

Summary of the main articles
>>    Contract number: 10208106002-01
>>    In order to secure the indebtedness of Shenzhen Tongli High-tech Co., Ltd.
      (hereinafter  referred to as Obligor) under the loan agreement  (reference
      no. 10208106002, hereinafter referred to as Master Agreement) entered into
      by Creditor and Obligor,  the Guarantor  agrees to provide guaranty to the
      Creditor as the guarantor of the Obligor.
>>    Secured  items include the loan  principal,  interest,  penalty  interest,
      breach of contract  compensation  and all the  expenses  incurred  for the
      Creditor to realize its right under Loan Agreement;
>>    Guaranty period:
            |X|   Two years from the expiry date that the Obligor should fulfill
                  its obligations in accordance with Loan Agreement;
            |X|   If due to the provisions of relevant PRC law or regulations or
                  any agreement  reached under Loan Agreement,  any loan becomes
                  mature ahead of its term,  guaranty  period shall be two years
                  starting from the advance mature date.

Summary of the articles omitted
>>    Method of Guaranty
>>    Scope of Guaranty
>>    Rights and Obligations of the Creditor
>>    Rights and Obligations of the Guarantor
>>    Liabilities of Breach of Contract
>>    Effectiveness, modification and termination of the Contract
>>    Notarization
>>    Applicable Laws and Dispute settlement
>>    Special Representation of the Guarantor
>>    Notes
>>    Miscellaneous
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3772 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, as the ‘‘First Sergeant 

Landres Cheeks Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2012 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill 

JANUARY 17, 2012 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, as the ‘‘First Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT LANDRES CHEEKS POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 150 South Union Street in CanVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:00 Jan 18, 2012 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3772.IH H3772

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3772 IH

1 ton, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘First Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘First Sergeant 

7 Landres Cheeks Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

May 23, 2016 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M160517 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM – BRIEFING ON THE 

STATUS OF LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FUKUSHIMA 

DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT, 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016, 

COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT 

NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by an external panel and a panel of NRC staff on the status of 

actions taken in response to lessons learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident, progress on 

Tier 1 activities, and plans for resolving open Tier 2 and 3 recommendations. The external 

panelists were Anthony Pietrangelo, Chief Nuclear Officer, Nuclear Energy Institute; Ken 

Canavan, Director of Plant Technology, Electric Power Research Institute; Randy Bunt, 

Chairman of the Boiling Water Reactor Owner’s Group Fukushima Response Committee, 

Southern Nuclear Company; and Paul Gunter, Director, Reactor Oversight Project, Beyond 

Nuclear. 

 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
#### City of Beacon, Appellant, v. County of Dutchess, Respondent.

In this action to recover a real estate tax paid by plaintiff to defendant, plaintiff alleges that the budget of defendant for 1954 contained excessive appropriations and the surpluses in the various funds which could be expected at the close of fiscal year 1953 were underestimated, with the result that the real estate taxes required to be levied were too high and, in fact, could have been eliminated entirely had the surpluses in each fund been estimated correctly. This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. In the absence *1051of express statutory authority *(Lower Nazareth Twp. Supervisors’ Appeal,*336 Pa. 250), courts do not have the power to review the exercise of discretionary powers by a municipal corporation as to estimates of money required to carry on the affairs of the municipality *(East St. Louis*v. *Zebley,*110 U. S. 321, 324) except in cases involving fraud *(Otis*v. *Los Angeles Go.,*9 Gal. 2d 366). Fraud is not alleged. If plaintiff was of the opinion that a particular appropriation was excessive, the time and place to have objected was at the public hearing required by section 359 of the County Law to be held before the budget was adopted; not having objected there, plaintiff should be held to have waived such an objection. *(Wall*v. *State of California, 73*Cal. App. 2d 838; see, also, *Matter of Hermanee*v. *Board of Supervisors of Ulster Co., 71*N. Y. 481, 488.) In any event, paragraph (m) of subdivision 1 of section 355 of the County Law requires only that estimated surpluses, rather than actual surpluses, in the various funds be applied to the reduction of the real estate tax levy. The difference between the actual surpluses and estimated surpluses, known as unappropriated cash surplus, may be appropriated by the Board of Supervisors at any time for “any lawful purpose” (County Law, § 366, subd. 1) and, therefore, such surpluses may not be required by the courts to be appropriated for the reduction of the real estate tax levy. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.
|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION                              |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |

|                              |
|------------------------------|
|                              |  |  |  |  |
| Delaware                     |   | 1-5823 |   | 36-6169860 |
| (State or other jurisdiction |   | (Commission |   | (IRS Employer |
| of incorporation)            |   | File Number) |   | Identification No.) |

|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
| 333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois         |   | 60604 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| NOT APPLICABLE                                                 |
| (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) |

----

|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |
|               | Votes For |   | Votes Withheld |   | Broker Non-Votes |
| Paul J. Liska      | 264,335,552 |   | 991,196 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Jose O. Montemayor | 264,334,749 |   | 991,999 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Thomas F. Motamed  | 253,683,492 |   | 11,643,256 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Don M. Randel      | 264,334,549 |   | 992,199 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Joseph Rosenberg   | 256,262,473 |   | 9,064,275 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Andrew H. Tisch    | 256,256,536 |   | 9,070,212 |   | 1,778,407 |
| James S. Tisch     | 256,109,466 |   | 9,217,282 |   | 1,778,407 |
| Marvin Zonis       | 264,267,051 |   | 1,059,697 |   | 1,778,407 |

|                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                    | Votes For |   | Votes Against |   | Votes Abstained |   | Broker Non-Votes |
| Advisory vote on executive compensation | 253,863,977 |   | 11,456,706 |   | 6,065 |   | 1,778,407 |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                     | Votes For |   | Votes Against |   | Votes Abstained |
| Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP | 266,822,117 |   | 278,902 |   | 4,136 |

----

|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |  |
|                            |   | CNA Financial Corporation |
|                            |   | (Registrant) |
|                            |   |   |
| Date:  April 26, 2012 | By | /s/ D. Craig Mense |
|                            |   | (Signature) |
|                            |   | D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
lb/day tpy DR‐GE‐01	through	DR‐GE‐07 Drillship	Main	Engines	and	Emergency	Generator 393,124 31,322 All	sources	with	EPN	starting	with		SB Supply	Boats 369,565 38,435 DR‐PO‐01 Painting	(paint	+	thinner)

‐ ‐ DR‐WL‐01,	DR‐WL‐02 Wire	Line	Engines	no.	1	and	2 15,118 1,572 DR‐GE‐08 ROV	Emergency	Generator 486.75 24.34 DR‐AC‐01 Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine	#1 10.31 0.54 DR‐AC‐02 Air	Compressor	Diesel	Engine	#2 8.59 0.45 DR‐EC‐01	through	DR‐EC‐06 Escape	Capsule	Diesel	Engine	no.	1	to	6 122.55 12.25 DR‐FL‐01 Diesel	Powered	Forklift	Engine 824.61 85.76 DR‐FR‐01 Fast	Rescue	Craft 131.71 13.17 DR‐WB‐01 Water	Blasting	Engine 2,858.65 297.30 DR‐DC‐01	through	DR‐DC‐03 Dust	Collectors	no.	1	to	3

‐ ‐ DR‐WO‐01 Welding

‐ ‐ DR‐DT‐01	through	DR‐DT‐09 Nine	Drill	Ship	Diesel	Storage	Tanks

‐ ‐ DR‐FT‐01	through	DR‐FT‐03 Three	Drill	Ship	Jet	Fuel	Storage	Tank s ‐‐ DR‐FE‐01 Drillship	Fugitive	Emissions

‐ ‐ DR‐VG‐01 Mud	Degasser	Vent 3,231 336 DR‐CU‐01,	DR‐CU‐02 Drilling	Casing	Units	1	and	2 6,795 706.66 DR‐EL‐01,	DR‐EL‐02 Electric	line	diesel	1	and	2 16,492 1,715 DR‐VS‐01	through	DR‐VS‐05 Well	Evaluation	Engines	No.	1	to	5 19,241 50.11 828,008 74,571

Drilling Scenario

Total Emissions Air Emission Sources 

### Table 13. Drilling Scenario

– GHG Emissions

EPN(s)
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.10 The Commission.

The Commission is composed of five members, not more than three of whom may be members of the same political party. The members are appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, for 5-year terms, one term ending each year. The Chairman is designated by the President pursuant to the provisions of section 3 of Reorganization Plan No. 10 of 1950 (3 CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 1006). The terms Chair, Chairperson, Chairman, Chairwoman, and the like may be used interchangeably. The Commission is assisted by a staff, which includes lawyers, accountants, engineers, financial security analysts, investigators, and examiners, as well as administrative and clerical employees.

[86 FR 9441, Feb. 16, 2021]
Williams, Renee (OST) "hflgJi/^ D or- dsr- /^y?- Ag^x 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

IBEW_2032 [ibew@twcny.rr.conn] 

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:17 AM 

EAS (OST) 

supervisor@town.massena.ny.us 

Cape Air 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I am writing this e-mail in support of keeping Cape Air as the air carrier for the Massena area. I fly from Massena to 

Albany several times a month. Cape Air has several flights from Massena to Albany and are very accommodating. They 

have served the North Country well and it would be a shame to lose them. Please consider keeping them as the North 

Country carrier. 

If you have any questions or comments, please e-mail me at the above address. 

Thank you. 

Peter Dishaw - < 

5~j
### §1437z–3. Pet ownership in public housing

#### (a) Ownership conditions

A resident of a dwelling unit in public housing (as such term is defined in subsection (c)) may own 1 or more common household pets or have 1 or more common household pets present in the dwelling unit of such resident, subject to the reasonable requirements of the public housing agency, if the resident maintains each pet responsibly and in accordance with applicable State and local public health, animal control, and animal anti-cruelty laws and regulations and with the policies established in the public housing agency plan for the agency.

#### (b) Reasonable requirements

The reasonable requirements referred to in subsection (a) may include—

(1) requiring payment of a nominal fee, a pet deposit, or both, by residents owning or having pets present, to cover the reasonable operating costs to the project relating to the presence of pets and to establish an escrow account for additional costs not otherwise covered, respectively;

(2) limitations on the number of animals in a unit, based on unit size;

(3) prohibitions on—

(A) types of animals that are classified as dangerous; and

(B) individual animals, based on certain factors, including the size and weight of the animal; and

(4) restrictions or prohibitions based on size and type of building or project, or other relevant conditions.

#### (c) Pet ownership in public housing designated for occupancy by elderly or handicapped families

For purposes of this section, the term "public housing" has the meaning given the term in section 1437a(b) of this title, except that such term does not include any public housing that is federally assisted rental housing for the elderly or handicapped, as such term is defined in section 1701r–1(d) of title 12.

#### (d) Regulations

This section shall take effect upon the date of the effectiveness of regulations issued by the Secretary to carry out this section. Such regulations shall be issued after notice and opportunity for public comment in accordance with the procedure under section 553 of title 5 applicable to substantive rules (notwithstanding subsections (a)(2), (b)(B), and (d)(3) of such section).

(Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, title I, §31, as added Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §526, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2568.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective and applicable beginning upon Oct. 1, 1999, except as otherwise provided, with provision that Secretary may implement section before such date except to extent otherwise provided, see section 503 of Pub. L. 105–276, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 1437 of this title.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 9, 2012

TO: RICE NESHAP Docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

FROM: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

SUBJECT: June 26, 2012 Conference Call Regarding Proposed Amendments to the RICE 

NESHAP

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 26, 2012 

to discuss the proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines. The amendments were proposed on 

June 7, 2012.

ATTENDEES

Eric Ginsburg, EPA Christina Simeone, PennFuture

Robert Wayland, EPA Hilary Sinnamon, Red Mountain Group

Melanie King, EPA Courtney Lane, PennFuture

Michael Horowitz, EPA Rachel Clark, Conservation Law Foundation

Mark Kresowik, Sierra Club Paul Miller, NESCAUM

Justin Vickiers, Environmental Law and 

 Policy Center
#### § 227.504 Definition of “qualified purchaser”.

For purposes of section 18(b)(3) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(3)], a “qualified purchaser” means any person to whom securities are offered or sold pursuant to an offering under §§ 227.100 through 227.504 (Regulation Crowdfunding).

[86 FR 3593, Jan. 14, 2021]
3416.603-3 Limitations.

If the HCA is to sign a letter contract as the contracting officer, the SPE signs the written

determination under FAR 16.603–3.

Parent topic: Subpart 3416.6—Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts
#### § 239.800 Form CB, report of sales of securities in connection with an exchange offer or a rights offering.

This Form is used to report sales of securities in connection with a rights offering in reliance upon § 230.801 of this chapter and to report sales of securities in connection with an exchange offer or business combination in reliance upon § 230.802 of this chapter.

[64 FR 61403, Nov. 10, 1999]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form CB, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### § 230.505 [Reserved]
#### § 210.9-06 Condensed financial information of registrant.

The information prescribed by § 210.12-04 shall be presented in a note to the financial statements when the restricted net assets (§ 210.1-02(dd)) of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25 percent of consolidated net assets as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year. The investment in and indebtedness of and to bank subsidiaries shall be stated separately in the condensed balance sheet from amounts for other subsidiaries; the amount of cash dividends paid to the registrant for each of the last three years by bank subsidiaries shall be stated separately in the condensed statement of comprehensive income from amounts for other subsidiaries.

[83 FR 50205, Oct. 4, 2018]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00139-CV

Ex parte Carolyn Barnes

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Carolyn Barnes filed an original Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this Court, 1

seeking relief from an order of commitment arising out of a criminal case. 

This Court’s original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus is limited to those

cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained because the person has violated an order, judgment,

or decree entered in a civil case. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (West 2004); Dodson

v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex parte Hawkins,

885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding). Power to consider original

applications for writs of habeas corpus in criminal cases lies with the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals, not this Court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (West 2005); see also

Tex. Const. art. V, § 5(c). Because Barnes’s application arises from an order entered in a criminal

case, not a civil case, we lack jurisdiction to consider it.

The application was filed by Dessie Maria Andrews purporting to act on behalf of 1

Carolyn Barnes. Habeas petitions may be presented by someone other than the applicant on the

applicant’s behalf. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.12, 11.13 (West 2005).
The Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 25, 2011

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000438

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

SUNITA CHAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

NARESH CHAND, Respondent-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 5FDA-23-0000063)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the November 10, 2023 Stipulation

to Dismiss Appeal, filed by Petitioner-Appellant Sunita Chand,

the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) the

appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss

the appeal and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on

appeal; (3) the stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for

all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is

authorized by Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is

approved and the appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear

their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 30, 2023.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000438

30-NOV-2023

07:57 AM

Dkt. 26 OAWST
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Short Supply Regulations--Unprocessed Western Red Cedar.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0025.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 35 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 60 minutes per response.
    Number of Respondents: 35 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: The information is collected as supporting 
documentation for license applications to export western red cedar logs 
to enforce the Export Administration Act's prohibition against the 
export of such logs from State or Federal lands.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, DOC Paperwork Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 or via Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5b1bdacbbb0be95b1bab6fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd999584939896bd99929ed39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: February 3, 2004.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2648 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>