alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer


of CNA Financial Corporation


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2017filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:May 1, 2017By/s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig MenseChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-12-036

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

September 7, 2012

E-Mail: OPA3 @nrc.gov 

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS PALISADES’

SAFETY CULTURE ASSESSMENT RESULTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on Sept. 12 to discuss the 

Palisades nuclear plant’s 2012 safety culture assessment results and subsequent actions to improve safety 

culture. The plant is owned by Entergy Nuclear Operations and is located in Covert, Mich., approximately 

40 miles west of Kalamazoo.

The meeting will run from 6 to 8:30 p.m. EDT at the Beach Haven Event Center at 10420 M-140, 

South Haven, Mich. The meeting will be open for the public, which can ask questions of the NRC after 

the presentations. Members of the public can also participate by calling the toll-free teleconference 

number 800-621-9524 and entering passcode 5591733. 

The public meeting is being held to better understand the results of the plant’s safety culture 

assessment, which was conducted by an outside contractor, and resulting corrective actions. 

The NRC defines safety culture as the core values and behaviors resulting from a collective 

commitment by leaders and individuals to emphasize safety over competing goals to ensure protection of 

people and the environment. 

Based on the NRC’s ongoing inspections and assessments the agency has concluded the plant 

continues to operate safely. 

Copies of the NRC’s Request for Information and Special Inspection Report can be found on the 

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.
**Exhibit 4.126**
§ 229.906 (Item 906) Allocation of roll-up consideration. ( a ) Describe in reasonable detail the method used to allocate interests in the successor to investors in the partnerships and the reasons why such method was used.
( b ) Provide a table showing the calculation of the valuation of each partnership and the allocation of interests in the successor to investors. Such table shall include for each partnership the following information (or other information of a comparable character necessary to an understanding of the calculation and allocation): ( 1 ) The value assigned to each significant category of assets of the partnership and the total value assigned to the partnership;
( 2 ) The total value assigned to all partnerships;
( 3 ) The aggregate amount of interests in the successor to be allocated to each partnership and the percentage of the total amount of all such interests represented thereby; and
( 4 ) The amount of interests of the successor to be issued to investors per interest held in each partnership (on an equivalent interest basis, such as per $1,000 invested).
( c ) If interests in the successor will be allocated to the general partner in exchange for its general partner interest or otherwise or if the general partner will receive other consideration in connection with the roll-up transaction: ( 1 ) Describe in reasonable detail the method used to allocate interests in the successor to the general partner or to determine the amount of consideration payable to the general partner and the reasons such method(s) was used; and
( 2 ) Identify the consideration paid by the general partner for interests in the partnerships that will be exchanged in the roll-up transaction.
No: 15-044 July 7, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Licensing Board to Hear Oral Argument On

Indian Point License Amendment Request July 30 in Rockville, Md

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral argument

Thursday, July 30, in Rockville, Md., concerning a challenge to a proposed license amendment for 

Unit 2 of the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y. The Board is the independent body 

within the NRC that conducts adjudicatory hearings and renders decisions on legal challenges to 

licensing actions.

The session will start at 1 p.m. in the Board’s hearing room on the third floor of the NRC’s Two 

White Flint North building, 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. The oral argument will address the 

admissibility of contentions filed by the state of New York. The state contends the plant owner, 

Entergy, failed to meet several legal requirements in requesting a schedule change for testing Unit 2’s 

containment structure.

Members of the public and media can observe the session, but participation will be limited to 

lawyers for New York, Entergy, and the NRC staff. Those planning to attend the oral argument should 

arrive at least 15 minutes early to allow time for security screening, including searches of hand-carried 

items such as briefcases or backpacks. No signs will be permitted in the hearing room.
§ 1502.14 Effective date of a regulation when no objections are filed. ( a ) If no objections are filed and no hearing is requested on a regulation under § 1502.5, the regulation is effective on the date specified in the regulation as promulgated.
( b ) The Commission shall publish a confirmation of the effective date of the regulation. The Federal Register document confirming the effective date of the regulation may extend the time for compliance with the regulation.
§ 201.522 Suspension of registration of brokers, dealers, or other Exchange Act-registered entities: Issuance and review of order. ( a ) *Basis for issuance.* An order suspending a registration, pending final determination as to whether the registration shall be revoked shall be issued only if the Commission finds that the suspension is necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
( b ) *Content, scope and form of order.* Each order suspending a registration shall: ( 1 ) Describe the basis for its issuance, including the alleged or threatened violations and the harm that is likely to result without the issuance of an order;
( 2 ) Describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the order instituting proceedings or any other document, the act or acts the respondent is to take or refrain from taking; and
( 3 ) Be indorsed with the date and hour of issuance.
( c ) *Effective upon service.* An order suspending a registration is effective upon service upon the respondent.
( d ) *Service: how made.* Service of an order suspending a registration shall be made pursuant to § 201.141(a). The person who serves the order shall promptly file a declaration of service identifying the person served, the method of service, the date of service, the address to which service was made and the person who made service; provided, however, failure to file such a declaration shall have no effect on the validity of the service.
( e ) *Commission review.* At any time after the respondent has been served with an order suspending a registration, the respondent may apply to the Commission or the hearing officer to have the order set aside, limited, or suspended. The application shall set forth with specificity the facts that support the request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Hal Giomi, the Chief Executive  Officer of The BankHoldings  (the  “Company”),  hereby  certifies  thatto the best of his knowledge:

 

1.           This Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30,  2003 (the  “Report”)  fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of theSecurities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.           Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companyat the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2003 |                                 |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                             | /s/ Hal Giomi                        |   |
|                             | Harold G. Giomi                      |
|                             | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

*This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for anyother purpose.

 

----
#### § 201.57 Commission review.

In accordance with the procedures set forth in 17 CFR 201.410 and 201.411, either the applicant or counsel for the Office or Division of the Commission may seek review of the initial decision on the fee application, or the Commission may decide to review the decision on its own initiative. If neither the applicant nor counsel for the Division or Office of the Commission seeks review and the Commission does not take review on its own initiative, the initial decision on the application shall become a final decision of the Commission 30 days after it is issued. Whether to review a decision is a matter within the discretion of the Commission. If review is taken, the Commission will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the administrative law judge for further proceedings.

[47 FR 610, Jan. 6, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 32795, June 23, 1995]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30389

Summary Calendar

 

ANTHONY A. EDWARDS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R.L. PROSPER, Corrections Officer (FDC Oakdale);

SENEGAL, Unit Disciplinary Team (FDC Oakdale); 

KOSCO, Member Unit Disciplinary Team (FDC Oakdale);

HAM, District Hearing Officer (FDC Oakdale);

R.D. MILES, Warden FDC Oakdale; JANET RENO,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-928

--------------------

January 17, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony A. Edwards (#26325) appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 389 (1971). Edwards’ motion

for leave to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED.

Edwards has not shown that the district court abused its

discretion by denying his motion for recusal. See Liteky v. 
No. 99-30389

-2-

United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994)(judicial rulings alone do

not constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion).

Edwards has not challenged sufficiently the district court’s

reasons for dismissing his due process claims. See Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987)(when appellant fails to identify error in district court's

analysis, it is the same as if appellant had not appealed

judgment). Edwards also has abandoned his conspiracy, alienage

discrimination, involuntary servitude, and supervisory liability

claims by failing to assert them properly and by failing to

challenge the district court’s reasons for dismissing them.

Edwards has not shown the type of injury required to allege

a denial of access claim. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S. Ct. 2174,

2179-80 (1996). Edwards has not made the required showing to

sustain a retaliation claim that “but for the retaliatory motive

the complained of incident . . . would not have occurred.” Woods

v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995).

Edwards has not shown that the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment on alternate grounds.

MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF GRANTED; DISMISSAL

AFFIRMED.
#### § 240.11 Wholesaler or third party performance of seller's obligations.

A seller may contract with intermediaries, such as wholesalers, distributors, or other third parties, to perform all or part of the seller's obligations under sections 2(d) and (e). The use of intermediaries does not relieve a seller of its responsibility to comply with the law. Therefore, in contracting with an intermediary, a seller should ensure that its obligations under the law are in fact fulfilled.
### §17504. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17504 was editorially reclassified as section 60504 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §16492. Regulation of certain oil used in transformers

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, or rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency, vegetable oil made from soybeans and used in electric transformers as thermal insulation shall not be regulated as an oil identified under section 2720(a)(1)(B) of title 33.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XIV, §1403, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1061.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.0-4 Nondisclosure of information obtained in examinations and investigations.

Information or documents obtained by officers or employees of the Commission in the course of any examination or investigation pursuant to section 17(a) (48 Stat. 897, section 4, 49 Stat. 1379; 15 U.S.C. 78q(a)) or 21(a) (48 Stat. 899; 15 U.S.C. 78u(a)) shall, unless made a matter of public record, be deemed confidential. Except as provided by 17 CFR 203.2, officers and employees are hereby prohibited from making such confidential information or documents or any other non-public records of the Commission available to anyone other than a member, officer or employee of the Commission, unless the Commission or the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated authority, authorizes the disclosure of such information or the production of such documents as not being contrary to the public interest. Any officer or employee who is served with a subpoena requiring the disclosure of such information or the production of such documents shall appear in court and, unless the authorization described in the preceding sentence shall have been given, shall respectfully decline to disclose the information or produce the documents called for, basing his or her refusal upon this section. Any officer or employee who is served with such a subpoena shall promptly advise the General Counsel of the service of such subpoena, the nature of the information or documents sought, and any circumstances which may bear upon the desirability of making available such information or documents.

[44 FR 50836, Aug. 30, 1979, as amended at 53 FR 17459, May 17, 1988; 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
•••ARTMbNTO F

Feb . 14 , 201 2 : 'MSPORWiOJ V

• ••• - /-\ornA. TP j !• ; Docke t Managemen t Facilit y' j i UMZ-MIUIV- ' U.S . Dept . o fTransportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 1 f£ 120 0 Ne wJerseyAve . S E West Buildin g Gran d Floo r Roo m W-12014 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 T o Who m I t Ma yConcern : I a m writin g i n suppor t o fSu n CountryAirline s havin g dockin g spac e a t Reaga n Nationa l Airport , i n orde rt o maintai n yea rroun d servic e betwee n Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airpor t i n Lansing , Michigan , an d Reaga n Nationa l Airport . Thi s rout e i s extremel yimportan t t o Greate rLansing' s economi cdevelopmen t efforts . Th e exemptio n tha t Su n Countryseek s wil l no t adversel yaffec t safety , sinc e th e airlin e has provide d saf e servic e o n th e rout e sinc e April , 2011 . Pleas e authoriz e additiona l slot s t o Su n Countryunde rth e exemptio n rule . Than k you . Sincerely , 

# >\."n . k' j Norber t M . Kurt z 113 2 Shelte rLan e Lansing , M i 4891 2
Name (Last, First, Middle)TitleCompany/OrganizationStreet AddressPhoneEmailWebinarAttendees:FluorescentLampBallast‐ECSNOPRMeetingFaxCityState/ProvCountryZipMeetingDate: Tuesday,May10,2011Mechanical Engineer/ManagerProject Manager Energy &Environment DirectoratePacific Northwest NationalLaboratory (PNNL)eric.andersen@pnl.gov902 Battelle BoulevardP.O. Box 999MSIN K5-22509-375-2735Andersen, Eric SN/ARichlandWAUSA99352Research EconomistPNNLnatasha.collins@pnl.gov620 SW 5th AveN/ACollins, NatashaN/APortlandORUSA97204Senior EngineerNatural Resources DefenseCouncil (NRDC)Center for Energy EfficiencyStandardspdelforge@nrdc.org111 Sutter Street415-875-6139Delforge, Pierre415-875-6161San FranciscoCAUSA94114Standards EngineerNatural Resources Canadapierre.gallant@nrcan.gc.ca580 Booth StreetN/AGallant, PierreN/AOttawaONCANK1A0E4Appliance StandardsProgram ManagerNortheast Energy EfficiencyPartnerships (NEEP)djlis@NEEP.org91 Hartwell Avenue781-860-9177x 127Lis, David781-860-9178LexingtonMAUSAO2421N/APacific Northwest NationalLaboratoryscott.morris@pnl.gov902 Battle Blvd, P.O.Box999509-372-6454Morris, ScottN/ARichlandWAUSA99532N/APNNCmichael.myer@pnl.gov57 Bedford Street, Suite101781-862-2321Myer, MichaelN/ALexingtonMAUSA01760N/ASouthern California Edisondavid.g.rivers@sce.com6042 B Irwindale AveN/ARivers, DavidN/AIrwindaleCAUSA91702Managing DirectorNavigant Consultingmrivest@navigantconsulting.com1801 K Street NWSuite 500202-375-3834Rivest, Michel202-973-2401WashingtonDCUSA20001Sr. Research ScientistPNNLlsteele@charter.net5510 W 18th AveN/ASteele, LindsayN/AKennewickWAUSA99338Environmental ScientistNew York State Office of theAttorney GeneralLinda.Wilson@ag.ny.gov120 Broadway212-416-8948Wilson, Linda212-416-6007New YorkNYUSA10271ContactsIncluded:11DocketId:EERE‐2007‐BT‐STD‐0016Page1of108/30/201112:24:18
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4022 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right of a claimant 

in a civil action before a Federal court to retain a structured settlement 

broker to negotiate the terms of payment of an award, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2012 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Ms. HOCHUL, and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to protect the right 

of a claimant in a civil action before a Federal court 

to retain a structured settlement broker to negotiate 

the terms of payment of an award, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Structured Settlement 

5 Claimants Rights Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4022 IH

1 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

2 (a) FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS.—Chapter 111 

3 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘§ 1660. Right to retain structured settlement broker 

6 ‘‘A claimant in any civil action before a Federal court 

7 shall have the right to retain a structured settlement 

8 broker to act on behalf of that claimant for purposes of 

9 negotiating a schedule of payments or other terms of pay10 ment of a sum certain previously agreed to paid by or on 

11 behalf of the defendant in satisfaction of a judgment 

12 against that defendant or in accordance with the terms 

13 of a settlement. The court shall inform the claimant of 

14 this right at the appropriate time. The defendant shall 

15 provide timely notice of any professional relationship be16 tween the defendant and the broker if any such relation17 ship exists or has existed.’’. 

18 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS.—Section 554 of 

19 title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

20 end the following: 

21 ‘‘(f) In the case of any proceeding under this section, 

22 a party to that proceeding shall have the right to retain 

23 a structured settlement broker to act on behalf of that 

24 party for purposes of negotiating a schedule of payments 

25 or other terms of payment of a sum certain previously 

26 agreed to paid by or on behalf of another party in satisfacVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:13 Feb 15, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4022.IH H4022

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4022 IH

1 tion of a decision against that party or in accordance with 

2 the terms of a settlement between the parties. The agency 

3 shall inform the claimant of this right at the appropriate 

4 time. The defendant shall provide timely notice of any pro5 fessional relationship between the defendant and the 

6 broker if any such relationship exists or has existed.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Chi-Wen Tsai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 24, 2014



By:

/s/ Chi-Wen TsaiName:

Chi-Wen TsaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------