alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3949 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5- 

[(2-cyano-4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]-2-[[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy) ethyl]amino]-4- 

methyl-6-(phenylamino)-) and (3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2-cyano-4- 

nitrophenyl)diazenyl]-6-[[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy) ethyl]amino]-4-methyl-2- 

(phenylamino)-). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (3- 

Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2-cyano-4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]- 

2-[[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy) ethyl]amino]-4-methyl-6- 

(phenylamino)-) and (3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2-cyano4-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]-6-[[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy) 

ethyl]amino]-4-methyl-2-(phenylamino)-). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3949 IH

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF (3-PYRIDINECARBONITRILE, 5-[(2- 

2 CYANO-4-NITROPHENYL)DIAZENYL]-2-[[2-(2- 

3 HYDROXYETHOXY)ETHYL]AMINO]-4-METHYL4 6-(PHENYLAMINO)-) AND (3- 

5 PYRIDINECARBONITRILE, 5-[(2-CYANO-4- 

6 NITROPHENYL)DIAZENYL]-6-[[2-(2- 

7 HYDROXYETHOXY)ETHYL]AMINO]-4-METHYL8 2-(PHENYLAMINO)-). 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

11 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

12 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of (3- 

Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2- 

cyano-4-nitrophenyl) 

diazenyl]-2-[[2-(2- 

hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]amino]- 

4-methyl-6-(phenylamino)-) 

(CAS No.149988–44–3) and 

(3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-[(2- 

cyano-4-nitrophenyl) 

diazenyl]-6-[[2-(2- 

hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]amino]- 

4-methyl-2-(phenylamino)-) 

(CAS No. 137428–29–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.11.35) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

15 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §17032. Grants for biofuel production research and development in certain States

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall provide grants to eligible entities for research, development, demonstration, and commercial application of biofuel production technologies in States with low rates of ethanol production, including low rates of production of cellulosic biomass ethanol, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (b) Eligibility

To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an entity shall—

(1)(A) be an institution of higher education (as defined in section 15801 of this title), including tribally controlled colleges or universities, located in a State described in subsection (a); or

(B) be a consortium including at least 1 such institution of higher education and industry, State agencies, Indian tribal agencies, National Laboratories, or local government agencies located in the State; and

(2) have proven experience and capabilities with relevant technologies.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2010.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title II, §223, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1533.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
### §13041. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13041 was editorially reclassified as section 20351 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00360-CV

Ex Parte S.B.M. §

§

§

§

From the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (2013-40334-

362)

June 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for entry of 

appropriate orders expunging S.B.M.’s files and records related to his 2003 

arrest for the alleged sexual assault of R.W. 

It is further ordered that The State of Texas shall pay all of the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          496,364
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   5,399
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                743,069
<PP&E>                          4,755,944
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,586,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           65,106
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        4,806,763
<OTHER-SE>                      714,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,586,861
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                19,472
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   711,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (691,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (691,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (691,535)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)



</TABLE>
### §16324. Energy research fellowships

#### (a) Postdoctoral fellowship program

The Secretary shall establish a program under which the Secretary provides fellowships to encourage outstanding young scientists and engineers to pursue postdoctoral research appointments in energy research and development at institutions of higher education of their choice.

#### (b) Senior research fellowships

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall establish a program under which the Secretary provides fellowships to allow outstanding senior researchers and their research groups in energy research and development to explore research and development topics of their choosing for a period of not less than 3 years, to be determined by the Secretary.

#### (2) Consideration

In providing a fellowship under the program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider—

(A) the past scientific or technical accomplishment of a senior researcher; and

(B) the potential for continued accomplishment by the researcher during the period of the fellowship.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §984, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 908.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.550 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the procedures the Commission will follow to ensure compliance with the goals of the National Environmental Policy Act (*NEPA*) and with the procedures required by NEPA in the event that the Commission should take action subject to such procedural requirements.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob Muller, Deceased. Minnie Jeffries, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacob Muller, Deceased, Seller; Joseph D. Gentle, Purchaser.

On a submission of facts pursuant to section 546 of the Civil Practice Act, judgment is directed to be entered declaring that the Surrogate of Queens County has power to exercise discretion and direct or refuse to direct a sale of the real property of the intestate. It is agreed that the death occurred in 1884 and that letters of administration were not issued until 1954. Because of the provisions of section 90 of the Surrogate’s Court Act and of section 2560 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it must be assumed until the letters of administration are revoked that the administratrix has the authority conferred by statute. The statutes which were effective prior to September 1, 1930, are the source of power of this administratrix. (L. 1929, eh. 229; L. 1930, eh. 174; L. 1935, ch. 209; ef. *Matter of Reed,*214 N. Y. 383, and *Matter of Battell,*286 N. Y. 97, 104.) It is stated as a fact that the whereabouts of one of the distributees is unknown. In 1914, by subdivision 6 of section 2703 of the Code of Civil Procedure (L. 1914, eh. 443), power was conferred on surrogates to direct the sale, mortgage or lease of real property for the payment and distribution of the proceeds to the persons entitled thereto when any of such persons was absent. In 1926, section 234 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, the successor to section 2703 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was amended to provide that the power might be exercised before or at a final accounting. (L. 1926, ch. 743.) The petition for the issuance of letters of administration in its entirety is not included in the submission. It cannot be assumed, in view of the issuance of the letters, that the petition did not state that the deceased at his death was a resident of Queens County, which was one of the two necessary prerequisites to confer jurisdiction to appoint the administratrix. *(Sheldon*v. *Wright,*5 N. Y. 497, 511.) No limitation of time seems to have been applicable after the enactment of chapter 443 of the Laws of 1914 to the right of a distributee to apply for the sale of real property. *(Matter of Goetzmarm,*96 Mise. 377, 380.) On the facts stated, the only question that could be the subject of an action or special proceeding is the power of the Surrogate to appoint the administratrix and to hear and determine the application to sell the real estate. Therefore, the determination of any other question is precluded. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 546.) What the Surrogate in his discretion may decide cannot be foreseen. Neither can it be said on the facts submitted whether a marketable title will go to a purchaser if a sale is authorized. Present — MacCrate, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.
§ 20.6 Maintenance of books and records. ( a ) Every clearing organization shall keep all records of transactions in paired swaps or swaptions, and methods used to convert paired swaps or swaptions into futures equivalents, in accordance with the requirements of § 1.31 of this chapter.
( b ) Every reporting entity shall keep all records of transactions in paired swaps or swaptions, and methods used to convert paired swaps or swaptions into futures equivalents, in accordance with the requirements of § 1.31 of this chapter.
( c ) Every person with equal to or greater than 50 gross all-months-combined futures equivalent positions in paired swaps or swaptions on the same commodity shall: ( 1 ) Keep books and records showing all records for transactions resulting in such positions, which may be kept and reproduced for Commission inspection in the record retention format that such person has developed in the normal course of its business operations; and
( 2 ) Keep books and records showing transactions in the cash commodity underlying such positions or its products and byproducts, and all commercial activities that are hedged or which have risks that are mitigated by such positions, which may be kept in accordance with the recordkeeping schedule and reproduced for Commission inspection in the record retention format that such person has developed in the normal course of its business operations.
( d ) All books and records required to be kept by paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall be furnished upon request to the Commission along with any pertinent information concerning such positions, transactions, or activities.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Fairbanks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NationsHealth, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007     By: /s/ Timothy Fairbanks     Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 229.502 (Item 502) Inside front and outside back cover pages of prospectus. The registrant must furnish this information in plain English. See § 230.421(d) of Regulation C of this chapter. ( a ) *Table of contents.* On either the inside front or outside back cover page of the prospectus, provide a reasonably detailed table of contents. It must show the page number of the various sections or subdivisions of the prospectus. Include a specific listing of the risk factors section required by Item 105 of this Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.105). You must include the table of contents immediately following the cover page in any prospectus you deliver electronically.
( b ) *Dealer prospectus delivery obligation.* On the outside back cover page of the prospectus, advise dealers of their prospectus delivery obligation, including the expiration date specified by Section 4(3) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(3)) and § 230.174 of this chapter. If you do not know the expiration date on the effective date of the registration statement, include the expiration date in the copy of the prospectus you file under § 230.424(b) of this chapter. You do not have to include this information if dealers are not required to deliver a prospectus under § 230.174 of this chapter or Section 24(d) of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-24). You may use the following or other clear, plain language:
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation Until (*insert date*), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
[63 FR 6383, Feb. 6, 1998, as amended at 84 FR 12718, Apr. 2, 2019]
PUBLIC LAW 115–341—DEC. 21, 2018 132 STAT. 5039 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1211: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–341 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 400 N. 

Main Street, Encinal, Texas, as the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ENCINAL VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 400 N. Main Street, Encinal, Texas, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 1211] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
#### Mary O'Donnell, Appellant, v. James Gilroy, as Administrator, etc., Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.
#### Charles J. O'Connor, Respondent, v. Emmett Gregg and Others, Appellants.

Order denying motion for new trial on ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### §17303. Enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission

#### (a) Enforcement

This part shall be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction as though all applicable terms of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this part.

#### (b) Violation is treated as unfair or deceptive act or practice

The violation of any provision of this part shall be treated as an unfair or deceptive act or practice proscribed under a rule issued under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)).

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VIII, §813, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1724.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3921 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 224. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive 

Blue 224. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 224. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.73 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2014’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or with10 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3921 IH

1 (2) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwith2 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

3 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon 

4 proper request filed with U.S. Customs and Border 

5 Protection on or before the 15th day after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or with7 drawal from warehouse for consumption, of an arti8 cle— 

9 (A) that was made after December 31, 

10 2006, and before the date that is 15 days after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act, and 

12 (B) with respect to which there would have 

13 been no duty or a lower rate of duty if the 

14 amendment made by subsection (a) applied to 

15 such entry or withdrawal, 

16 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amend17 ment applied to such entry or withdrawal. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41247

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FIDEL RODRIGUEZ-REQUENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:06-CR-331

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fidel RodriguezRequeno raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §8907. Temporary site designation

(a) Criterion for Designation.—If the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the National Capital Memorial Commission, determines that a site where commemorative works may be displayed on a temporary basis is necessary to aid in the preservation of the limited amount of open space available to residents of, and visitors to, the Nation's Capital, a site may be designated on land the Secretary administers in the District of Columbia.

(b) Plan.—A designation may be made under subsection (a) only if, at least 120 days before the designation, the Secretary, in consultation with the Commission, prepares and submits to Congress a plan for the site. The plan shall include specifications for the location, construction, and administration of the site and criteria for displaying commemorative works at the site.

(c) Risk and Agreement To Indemnify.—A commemorative work displayed at the site shall be installed, maintained, and removed at the sole expense and risk of the person authorized to display the work. The person shall agree to indemnify the United States for any liability arising from the display of the commemorative work under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1231.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8907(a) | 40:1009(a) (1st sentence). | Pub. L. 99–652, §9, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3653; Pub. L. 103–321, §2(f), Aug. 26, 1994, 108 Stat. 1795. |
| 8907(b) | 40:1009(a) (2d, last sentences). | |
| 8907(c) | 40:1009(b). | |

Section