alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012366EN.01003002.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2012 — Gem-Year and Jinn-Well Auto-Parts (Zhejiang) v Council

(Case T-172/09) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - Support of the complaint by the Community industry - Definition of the product concerned - Injury - Market economy treatment - Costs of major inputs substantially reflecting market values - Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

2012/C 366/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd (Zhejiang, China) and Jinn-Well Auto-Parts (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd (Zhejiang) (represented: initially by K. Adamantopoulos and Y. Melin, and subsequently by Melin, V. Akritidis and F. Crespo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented: initially by J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, lawyers, and subsequently by Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents, assisted by G. Berrisch)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and C. Clyne, acting as Agents) and European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL (EIFI) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented: initially by J. Bourgeois, Y. van Gerven and E. Wäktare, and subsequently by J. Bourgeois, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 29, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd and Jinn-Well Auto-Parts (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union and of the European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd and Jinn-Well Auto-Parts (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union and of the European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-1973

___________ Wally Bredemeier, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Hallmark Cards, Inc., a Missouri * Western District of Missouri. corporation; Hallmark Marketing * Corporation, a Delaware * [UNPUBLISHED] corporation; Kenneth J. Sive; * Thomas L. Haskin; Gary Jacobsen, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 7, 1997 Filed: August 18, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri. -2- After the District Court granted summa ry judgment to 1 defendants in his age discrimination case, Wall y Bredemeier appeals. Having reviewed the record and th e parties ’ briefs, we conclude that the judgment of th e District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71785-71789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 05-05]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense if publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 05-05 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 71786]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10DE04.078


[[Page 71787]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10DE04.079


[[Page 71788]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10DE04.080


[[Page 71789]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10DE04.081

[FR Doc. 04-27125 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### Dennis Cioffi et al., Respondents, v American Airlines, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[818 NYS2d 917]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered January 19, 2006, unanimously discontinued in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Marlow, JJ.
# Publicatieblad L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0758 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | L 199 |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Wetgeving | 61e jaargang7 augustus 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0758

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

L 199

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Wetgeving

61e jaargang7 augustus 2018

---

| Inhoud | | II   Niet-wetgevingshandelingen | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONALE OVEREENKOMSTEN |
| | * | Informatie over de inwerkingtreding van de overeenkomst tussen de Europese Unie en het Koninkrijk Noorwegen betreffende administratieve samenwerking, bestrijding van fraude en invordering van schuldvorderingen op het gebied van de btw | 1 |

Inhoud

II   Niet-wetgevingshandelingen

Bladzijde

INTERNATIONALE OVEREENKOMSTEN

*

Informatie over de inwerkingtreding van de overeenkomst tussen de Europese Unie en het Koninkrijk Noorwegen betreffende administratieve samenwerking, bestrijding van fraude en invordering van schuldvorderingen op het gebied van de btw

1

| NL | Besluiten waarvan de titels mager zijn gedrukt, zijn besluiten van dagelijks beheer die in het kader van het landbouwbeleid zijn genomen en die in het algemeen een beperkte geldigheidsduur hebben.
  Besluiten waarvan de titels vet zijn gedrukt en die worden voorafgegaan door een sterretje, zijn alle andere besluiten. |
| --- | --- |

NL

Besluiten waarvan de titels mager zijn gedrukt, zijn besluiten van dagelijks beheer die in het kader van het landbouwbeleid zijn genomen en die in het algemeen een beperkte geldigheidsduur hebben.

Besluiten waarvan de titels vet zijn gedrukt en die worden voorafgegaan door een sterretje, zijn alle andere besluiten.

---

II Niet-wetgevingshandelingen

INTERNATIONALE OVEREENKOMSTEN

| 7.8.2018 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

L 199/1

---

Informatie over de inwerkingtreding van de overeenkomst tussen de Europese Unie en het Koninkrijk Noorwegen betreffende administratieve samenwerking, bestrijding van fraude en invordering van schuldvorderingen op het gebied van de btw

Na de ondertekening op 6 februari 2018 hebben de Europese Unie en het Koninkrijk Noorwegen elkaar (respectievelijk op 9 juli 2018 en op 26 juni 2018) in kennis gesteld van de voltooiing van hun interne wettelijke procedures bedoeld in artikel 44, lid 1, van de overeenkomst (1).

1

De overeenkomst treedt overeenkomstig artikel 44, lid 2, op 1 september 2018 in werking.

---

(1)  Overeenkomst tussen de Europese Unie en het Koninkrijk Noorwegen betreffende administratieve samenwerking, bestrijding van fraude en invordering van schuldvorderingen op het gebied van de btw (PB L 195 van 1.8.2018, blz. 3).

1

---
### §15304. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15304 was editorially reclassified as section 20904 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|November 8, 2006                                                 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### §1862e. Evaluations of research centers

In carrying out performance reviews of research centers by the Foundation, the Director shall take such action as may be necessary, consistent with the merit review process of the Foundation, to ensure that—

(1) members of review panels are free from any conflict of interest; and

(2) the conditions of each award to such centers have been fulfilled.

(Pub. L. 100–570, title I, §109, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2869.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.
October 18, 2016 

The Honorable Peter Welch 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Welch: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to the 

September 16, 2016, letter from you and your colleagues providing comments on the NRC’s 

rulemaking activity entitled Regulatory Improvements for Power Reactors Transitioning to 

Decommissioning. Your comments have been placed on the docket and will be considered as 

we move forward with this rulemaking. 

 As you acknowledged in your letter, the NRC published an advance notice of proposed 

rulemaking in November 2015 to obtain early stakeholder input on this rulemaking. The NRC 

staff is using the comments received from the public to inform the development of the regulatory 

basis, which is the next step in the rulemaking process. All of the issues you raised in your 

letter are among those we are evaluating. We expect to publish a draft version of the regulatory 

basis for public comment in November 2016. 

 Thank you for your interest in the work of the NRC. If I can be of any additional 

assistance, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, 

at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 
Identical letters sent to:

The Honorable Peter Welch 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Patrick Leahy 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable William R. Keating 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Bernard Sanders 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Michael E. Capuano 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Edward J. Markey 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Niki Tsongas 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Richard E. Neal 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Seth Moulton 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Katherine Clark 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Elizabeth Warren 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Joseph P. Kennedy, III 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable Richard J. Durbin 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Stephen F. Lynch 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

The Honorable James P. McGovern 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Jeff Gilford, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 26, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeff Gilford       
|                     |  |  |  | Jeff Gilford           
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 79—SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, ORGANIZATION AND PRIORITIES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND PRIORITIES

Sec.
6601.
Congressional findings; priority goals.
6602.
Congressional declaration of policy.
6603.
Sense of Congress on innovation acceleration research.
6604.
Interagency working group on research regulation.
6605.
Disclosure of funding sources in applications for Federal research and development awards.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY

6611.
Establishment of Office.
6612.
Director; Associate Directors.
6613.
Functions of the Director.
6614.
Policy planning; analysis; advice; establishment of advisory panel.
6615.
National science and technology strategy.
6615b.
Quadrennial science and technology review.
6616.
Additional functions of Director.
6617.
Coordination with other organizations.
6618.
Major science and technology proposals.
6619.
National coordination of research infrastructure.
6620.
Release of scientific research results.
6621.
Coordination of Federal STEM education.
6622.
Coordination of advanced manufacturing research and development.
6623.
Interagency public access committee.
6624.
Federal scientific collections.
6625.
Coordination of international science and technology partnerships.
6626.
Working group on inclusion in STEM fields.
6627.
Federally-funded research with enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

6631.
Establishment of Committee.
6632.
Membership of Committee.
6633.
Federal science, engineering, and technology survey; reports.
6634.
Continuation of Committee.
6635.
Staff and consultant support.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—FEDERAL COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY

6651.
Establishment, membership, and functions of Council.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—GENERAL PROVISIONS

6671.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—NATIONAL CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES PANEL

6681 to 6685. Omitted.
6686.
Science and Technology Policy Institute.
6687.
Critical technology strategies.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15Al2-1 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P068]


State of Tennessee Amendment <greek-i>1

    In accordance with notices received from the Department of Homeland 
Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective October 22 and 
November 10, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is 
hereby amended to include Giles and Unicoi Counties in the State of 
Tennessee as disaster areas due to damages caused by severe storms and 
flooding occurring on September 16-20, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is December 6, 2004.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008)

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-26759 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Part 540 [Reserved]           **Parent topic:** General Services Administration Acquisition Manual
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Natura &Co Holding S.A. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2019 (the “Report”), I, José Antonio de Almeida Filippo, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 6, 2020



|/s/ José Antonio de Almeida Filippo | 
|----------------------------------- | 
|José Antonio de Almeida Filippo     | 
|Principal Financial Officer         |
Draft – Deliberative – Do Not Cite or Quote

Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) for 1,2,3-TMB 

1. A 90-day inhalation toxicity study of 1,2,3-TMB in male rats was selected as the basis for the 

derivation of the RfC (Korsak and Rydzynski, 1996). Please comment on whether the selection 

of this study is scientifically supported and clearly described. If a different study is 

recommended as the basis for the RfC, please identify this study and provide scientific support 

for this choice.

2. Decreased pain sensitivity (measured as an increased latency to pawlick response after a 

hotplate test) in male Wistar rats was concluded by EPA to be an adverse effect on the nervous 

system and was selected as the critical effect for the derivation of the RfC. Please comment on 

whether the selection of this critical effect and its characterization are scientifically supported 

and clearly described. If a different endpoint is recommended as the critical effect for deriving 

the RfC, please identify this effect and provide scientific support for this choice.

3. Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling was conducted using data for decreased pain sensitivity in 

male Wistar rats in conjunction with default dosimetric adjustments for calculating the human 

equivalent concentration (HEC) to estimate the point of departure (POD) for derivation of the 

RfC. Has the modeling been appropriately conducted and clearly described, based on EPA’s 

draft Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document (U.S. EPA, 2000b)? Has the choice of the 

benchmark response (BMR) for use in deriving the POD (i.e. a BMR of a change equal to 1 SD 

of the estimated control mean for the latency to pawlick response) been supported and clearly 

described?

4. Please comment on the rationale for the selection of the uncertainty factors (UFs) applied to 

the POD for the derivation of the RfC for 1,2,3-TMB. Are the UFs appropriate based on the 

recommendations described in A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration 

Processes (U.S. EPA, 2002), and clearly described? If changes to the selected UFs are proposed, 

please identify and provide scientific support for the proposed changes.

Oral Reference Dose (RfD) for 1,2,3-TMB 

The oral database for 1,2,3-TMB was considered to be inadequate for derivation of an RfD. 

Based on the similarities in chemical properties, toxicokinetics, and toxicity between the 1,2,4-

TMB and 1,2,3-TMB isomers, EPA concluded that there was sufficient similarity to support 

adopting the 1,2,4-TMB RfD as the RfD for 1,2,3-TMB.

1. Please comment on EPA’s conclusion that the oral database for 1,2,3-TMB is inadequate for 

derivation of an RfD. If an oral study on 1,2,3-TMB is recommended as the basis for the RfD, 

please identify this study and provide scientific support for this choice.

2. Please comment on EPA’s approach to developing the RfD for 1,2,3-TMB. Has the rationale 

for using the RfD for 1,2,4-TMB as the RfD for 1,2,3-TMB been appropriately and clearly 

presented? Please comment on whether this approach is scientifically supported and clearly 

described in the document.