alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Life USA, Inc. (the Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Richard
Newton CFO and CEO of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



                                                /s/Richard Newton
                                                   --------------------
                                                   Richard Newton, CFO & CFO



  Dated:  November 15, 2006
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

 February 22, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0143 – PROJECT AIM 

AND CENTERS OF EXPERTISE 

The Commission has approved staff’s Recommendation 1 to pursue Centers of Expertise 

(COEs) in the areas of rulemaking, allegations, external hazards evaluations, and technical 

specifications. The Commission’s approval is contingent upon completion of agency guidance 

on identifying, evaluating, and implementing COEs, as provided in Recommendation 2. 

The staff should establish safeguards in the COE guidance to ensure transparency for those 

with pending matters before the agency and continued line management accountability for 

meeting agency performance metrics. 

The staff should assess the impacts of the new COEs.

In agency guidance implementing COEs, consistent with prior Commission direction, the staff 

should continue to refine how it ensures that "stove-piping" is mitigated and organizational 

complexity and confusion is minimized. 

The staff should assess successes and lessons learned from implementation of the approved 

COEs, and issue associated agency-wide communications within one year of their 

implementation. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

PDR
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3857 

To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act 

of 2007 to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to include as 

an eligible use the sustainment of specialized operational teams used 

by local law enforcement under the Transit Security Grant Program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. TURNER of New York (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. ROGERS

of Alabama, and Mr. GRIMM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/ 

11 Commission Act of 2007 to require the Secretary 

of Homeland Security to include as an eligible use the 

sustainment of specialized operational teams used by 

local law enforcement under the Transit Security Grant 

Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Transit Security 

5 and Local Law Enforcement Support Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3857 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING USE OF GRANT FUNDS 

2 RELATING TO OPERATIONAL COSTS OF PUB3 LIC TRANSIT SECURITY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1406(b)(2) of the Imple5 menting Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 

6 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1135(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) 

8 through (H) as subparagraphs (F) through (I), re9 spectively; and 

10 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol11 lowing new subparagraph (E): 

12 ‘‘(E) specialized patrol teams, as defined 

13 by the Secretary in coordination with the recipi14 ents of grants under this section, including the 

15 sustainment of such teams without fiscal year 

16 or other limitation;’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of enactment 

19 of this Act and shall apply to grants made under section 

20 1406 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 

21 Commission Act of 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1135) on or after such 

22 date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 10.108 Settlements. ( a ) *When offers may be made.* Parties may at any time during the course of the proceeding propose offers of settlement. All offers of settlement shall be in writing.
( b ) *Content of offer of settlement.* Each offer of settlement made by a respondent shall: ( 1 ) Acknowledge service of the Complaint;
( 2 ) Admit the jurisdiction of the Commission with respect to the matters set forth in the Complaint;
( 3 ) Include a waiver of: ( i ) A hearing,
( ii ) All post-hearing procedures,
( iii ) Judicial review, and
( iv ) Any objection to the staff's participation in the Commission's consideration of the offer;
( 4 ) Stipulate the record basis on which an order may be entered, which may consist solely of the complaint and the findings contained in the offer of settlement; and
( 5 ) Consent to the entry of an order reflecting the terms of settlement agreed upon, including, where appropriate: ( i ) Findings by the Commission that the respondent has violated specified provisions of the Act, and
( ii ) The imposition of sanctions.
( c ) *Submission of offer of settlement.* Offers of settlement made by a respondent shall be submitted in writing to the Division of Enforcement, which shall present them to the Commission with the Division's recommendation. The respondent will be informed if the recommendation will be unfavorable, in which event the offer shall not be presented to the Commission unless the respondent so requests. Any offer of settlement not presented to the Commission shall be null and void with respect to any acknowledgement, admission, waiver, stipulation or consent contained in the offer and shall not be used in any manner in the proceeding by any party thereto.
( d ) *Acceptance of offer by the Commission.* The Commission will accept an offer of settlement only by issuing its opinion and order based on the offer. Upon issuance of the opinion and order, the proceeding shall be terminated as to the respondent involved and so noted on the docket by the Proceedings Clerk.
( e ) *Rejection of offer of settlement; effect of rejection.* When the Commission rejects an offer of settlement, the party making the offer shall be notified of the Commission's action and the offer of settlement shall be deemed withdrawn. A rejected offer of settlement and any documents relating thereto shall not constitute a part of the record in the proceeding; and the offer will be null and void with respect to any acknowledgment, admission, waiver, stipulation or consent contained in the offer and shall not be used in any manner in the proceeding by any party thereto.
[41 FR 2511, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 60 FR 54802, Oct. 26, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: February 24, 2010  /s/ Jose Acevedo Chief Executive Officer
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00306ACBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 26, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00024

- CV

Mary Margaret Blanchard, Appellant

v.

Grace Ann McNeill, as Successor Trustee of The Dixie Lee Hudlow Living Trust, as amended, and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Dixie Lee Hudlow, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE R TON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on September 4, 2015. Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that appellant has not pros ecuted her appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of prosecution. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and

the court below.
Letter agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

			
	 	  	Richard A. Post
	January 5, 2006	  	President and
	 	  	Chief Executive Officer
	 	  	Direct Line: 949.437-4707
	 	  	rickp@autobytel.com

  
 Robert S. Grimes 
 R.S. Grimes & Co., Inc. 
 The Empire State Building 
 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7801 
 New York, NY 10018 
  
 Dear Mr. Grimes: 
  
 Reference is hereby made to that certain Consulting Agreement entered
between Autobytel Inc. (formerly autobytel.com inc.) and Robert Grimes as of April 1, 2000, as amended (the “Agreement”). 
  
 The parties hereby agree that the Agreement is terminated effective as of December 31, 2005. 
  
 Please evidence your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and
returning a copy to the undersigned. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  
 Autobytel Inc.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Richard A. Post
	 	 	 


  

	
	 AGREED AND ACCEPTED
  
 This 5th day of January,
2006

	
	/s/ Robert S. Grimes
	Robert S. Grimes
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 26 
          - [REG-145988-03] 
          - RIN 1545-BC60 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed rulemaking relating to the predeceased parent rule. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at 10 a.m. is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Guy R. Traynor, Procedures and Administration, Publications & Regulations Branch, at (202) 622-3693 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, September 3, 2004 (69 FR 53862), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for December 14, 2004 at 10 a.m., in the auditorium of the Internal Revenue Service building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 2651 of the Internal Revenue Code.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of topics to be addressed by November 23, 2004. As of November 29, 2004, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for December 14, 2004 is cancelled. 

Guy R. Traynor, 

Federal Register Liaison, Publications & Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedures & Administration). 

[FR Doc. 04-26746 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on February 26, 2004, starting at 8 a.m. at the Redmond New Historic Hotel Conference Room on 521 S. 6th Street, Redmond, Oregon. Agenda items will include an open public forum from 9:15 a.m. till 9:45 a.m., Review of standing subcommittees, and the remaining time will be spent identifying present and future PAC representation needs. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, Deschutes NF, Crescent Rd., P.O. Box 208, Crescent, OR, 97754, phone (541) 433-3216. 

Dated: February 2, 2004. 

Leslie A.C. Weldon, 

Deschutes National Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 04-2674 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 300.3 Required label information. ( a ) The marking of wool products under the Act shall be in the form of a stamp, tag, label or other means of identification, showing and displaying upon the product the required information legibly, conspicuously, and nondeceptively. The information required to be shown and displayed upon the product in the stamp, tag, label, or other mark of identification, shall be that which is required by the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including the following: ( 1 ) The fiber content of the product specified in section 4(a)(2)(A) of the Act. The generic names and percentages by weight of the constituent fibers present in the wool product, exclusive of permissive ornamentation, shall appear on such label with any percentage of fiber or fibers designated as “other fiber” or “other fibers” as provided by section 4(a)(2)(A)(4) of the Act appearing last
( 2 ) The maximum percentage of the total weight of the wool product of any nonfibrous loading, filling or adulterating matter as prescribed by section 4(a)(2)(B) of the Act.
( 3 ) The name or registered identification number issued by the Commission of the manufacturer of the wool product or the name or registered identification number of one or more persons subject to section 3 of the Act with respect to such wool product.
( 4 ) The name of the country where the wool product was processed or manufactured.
( b ) In disclosing the constituent fibers in information required by the Act and regulations in this part or in any non-required information, no fiber present in the amount of less than 5 percent shall be designated by its generic name or fiber trademark but shall be designated as “other fiber,” except that the percentage of wool or recycled wool shall always be stated, in accordance with section 4(a)(2)(A) of the Act. When more than one of such fibers, other than wool or recycled wool, are present in amounts of less than 5 percent, they shall be designated in the aggregate as “other fibers.” Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall prevent the disclosure of any fiber present in the product which has a clearly established and definite functional significance when present in the amount stated, as for example:
“98% wool 2% nylon.”
[29 FR 6623, May 21, 1964, as amended at 45 FR 44261, July 1, 1980; 50 FR 15105, Apr. 17, 1985; 63 FR 7516, Feb. 13, 1998; 79 FR 32163, June 4, 2014]
| **Fair Value (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Mar. 31, 2019 | Dec. 31, 2018 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]**                        |          |          |
| Other invested assets overseas deposit                       | $ 54          | $ 48          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Overseas deposits are excluded from the fair value hierarchy because their fair value is recorded using the net asset value per share (or equivalent) practical experiment, which can be redeemed at net asset value in 90 days or less.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_OtherInvestedAssetsOverseasDeposit**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
§ 229.904 (Item 904) Risk factors and other considerations. ( a ) Immediately following the summary required by Item 903 of this subpart (§ 229.903), describe in reasonable detail each material risk and effect of the roll-up transaction on investors in each partnership, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) The potential risks, adverse effects and benefits of the roll-up transaction for investors and for the general partner, including those which result from each matter described in response to Item 905 of this subpart (§ 229.905), with appropriate cross references to the comparative information required by Item 905;
( 2 ) The material risks arising from an investment in the successor; and
( 3 ) The likelihood that securities of the successor received by investors in the roll-up transaction will trade in the securities markets at a price substantially below the value assigned to such securities in the roll-up transaction and/or the value of the assets of the successor, and the effects on investors of such a trading market discount.
( b ) Quantify each risk or effect to the extent practicable.
( c ) State whether any of such risks or effects may be different for investors in any partnership and, if so, identify such partnership(s) and describe such difference(s).
*Instruction to Item 904.* The requirement to quantify the effects of the roll-up transaction shall include, but not be limited to: (i) If cost savings resulting from combined administration of the partnerships is identified as a potential benefit of the roll-up transaction, the amount of cost savings and a comparison of such amount to the costs of the roll-up transaction; and (ii) If there may be a material conflict of interest of the sponsor or general partner arising from its receipt of payments or other consideration as a result of the roll-up transaction, the amount of such payments and other consideration to be obtained in the roll-up transaction and a comparison of such amounts to the amounts to which the sponsor or general partner would be entitled without the roll-up transaction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee to the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period beginning February 1, 2004, through February 1, 2006. 

                    For further information, contact Robert Delaney, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., m/s D-14, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 404/639-7000, fax 404/639-7111, e-mail:                     *rdelaney@cdc.gov.*

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated:  February 2, 2004. 

Alvin Hall, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 04-2671 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P