alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12522. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) State

The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

#### (2) State educational agency

The term "State educational agency" means—

(A) a State educational agency (as defined in section 12511 of this title) of a State; or

(B) for a State in which a State educational agency described in subparagraph (A) has designated a statewide entity under section 12523(e) 1 of this title, that designated statewide entity.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §111A, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1201, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 12523(e) of this title, referred to in par. (2)(B), probably should be a reference to section 12523(d) of this title, which relates to designation of a statewide entity to carry out the functions of the State educational agency. Section 12523(e) relates to consultation of the Corporation with the Secretary of Education.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12522, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §111A, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §103(a)(2), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 827, granted the Corporation authority to assist local applicants in nonparticipating States, prior to the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 111–13.

Another prior section 12522, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §112, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3133; Pub. L. 102–10, §4(3), Mar. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 30; Pub. L. 102–384, §4, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1455, related to allotments, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §103(a)(2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
June 15, 2015

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius

Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0032 – REVIEWING 

DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RELEASE USING SENSITIVE 

UNCLASSIFIED NON-SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION 

GUIDANCE

The Commission has approved the staff’s recommendation to discontinue the presumptive 

withholding from public release of fire protection and emergency planning and response 

information. The Commission has also approved the staff's request to withdraw the direction 

provided in Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM)-SECY-04-0191, “Withholding Sensitive 

Unclassified Information Concerning Nuclear Power Reactors from Public Disclosure,” and 

SRM-SECY-05-0101, “Withholding from Public Disclosure Sensitive Unclassified Information 

Concerning Materials Licenses and Certificate Holders,” to the extent that those SRMs 

approved presumptive withholding of these documents. Instead, consistent with the 

recommendations in SECY-15-0032, beginning six months from the date of this SRM, the staff 

should prospectively and proactively apply the NRC's Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards

Information (SUNSI) Policy to the review, release, and withholding of fire protection and

emergency preparedness documents. 

In addition, the Commission has approved the staff's recommendation to proactively review and 

release, consistent with the NRC's SUNSI Policy, Final Safety Analysis Reports (FSARs) and 

updated FSARs also beginning six months from the date of this SRM.

The staff should keep the Commission informed of any significant budget impacts resulting from

the staff's activities on this effort.

cc: Chairman Burns

Commissioner Svinicki 

Commissioner Ostendorff 

Commissioner Baran

OGC

CFO

OCA
### §15874. Intermountain West Geothermal Consortium

#### (a) Participation authorized

The Secretary, acting through the Idaho National Laboratory, may participate in a consortium described in subsection (b) to address science and science policy issues surrounding the expanded discovery and use of geothermal energy, including from geothermal resources on public lands.

#### (b) Members

The consortium referred to in subsection (a) shall—

(1) be known as the "Intermountain West Geothermal Consortium";

(2) be a regional consortium of institutions and government agencies that focuses on building collaborative efforts among the universities in the State of Idaho, other regional universities, State agencies, and the Idaho National Laboratory;

(3) include Boise State University, the University of Idaho (including the Idaho Water Resources Research Institute), the Oregon Institute of Technology, the Desert Research Institute with the University and Community College System of Nevada, and the Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah;

(4) be hosted and managed by Boise State University; and

(5) have a director appointed by Boise State University, and associate directors appointed by each participating institution.

#### (c) Financial assistance

The Secretary, acting through the Idaho National Laboratory and subject to the availability of appropriations, will provide financial assistance to Boise State University for expenditure under contracts with members of the consortium to carry out the activities of the consortium.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §237, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 673.)
### §15905. Royalty relief for deep water production

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsections (b) and (c), for each tract located in water depths of greater than 400 meters in the Western and Central Planning Area of the Gulf of Mexico (including the portion of the Eastern Planning Area of the Gulf of Mexico encompassing whole lease blocks lying west of 87 degrees, 30 minutes West longitude), any oil or gas lease sale under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) occurring during the 5-year period beginning on August 8, 2005, shall use the bidding system authorized under section 8(a)(1)(H) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(H)).

#### (b) Suspension of royalties

The suspension of royalties under subsection (a) shall be established at a volume of not less than—

(1) 5,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent for each lease in water depths of 400 to 800 meters;

(2) 9,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent for each lease in water depths of 800 to 1,600 meters;

(3) 12,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent for each lease in water depths of 1,600 to 2,000 meters; and

(4) 16,000,000 barrels of oil equivalent for each lease in water depths greater than 2,000 meters.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary may place limitations on royalty relief granted under this section based on market price.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §345, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 703.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 345, 67 Stat. 462, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§1331 et seq.) of chapter 29 of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of Title 43 and Tables.
Exhibit 31.3



Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Jason Wild, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2021 of TerrAscend Corp.;                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: March 24, 2022 |                              
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | /s/ Jason Wild               
|                     | Jason Wild                   
|                     | Executive Chairman           
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAMES ROBERT ELLIOT, 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00035-CR

Appeal from the

432nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1289808D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
§ 23.430 Verification of counterparty eligibility. ( a ) *Eligibility.* A swap dealer or major swap participant shall verify that a counterparty meets the eligibility standards for an eligible contract participant, as defined in Section 1a(18) of the Act and § 1.3 of this chapter, before offering to enter into or entering into a swap with that counterparty.
( b ) *Special Entity.* In verifying the eligibility of a counterparty pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, a swap dealer or major swap participant shall also verify whether the counterparty is a Special Entity.
( c ) *Special Entity election.* In verifying the eligibility of a counterparty pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, a swap dealer or major swap participant shall verify whether a counterparty is eligible to elect to be a Special Entity under § 23.401(c)(6) and, if so, notify such counterparty of its right to make such an election.
( d ) *Safe harbor.* A swap dealer or major swap participant may rely on written representations of a counterparty to satisfy the requirements of this section as provided in § 23.402(d). A swap dealer or major swap participant will have a reasonable basis to rely on such written representations for purposes of the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section if the counterparty specifies in such representations the provision(s) of Section 1a(18) of the Act or paragraph(s) of § 1.3 of this chapter that describe its status as an eligible contract participant and, in the case of a Special Entity, the paragraph(s) of the Special Entity definition in § 23.401(c) that define its status as a Special Entity.
( e ) This section shall not apply with respect to: ( 1 ) A transaction that is initiated on a designated contract market; or
( 2 ) A transaction initiated on a swap execution facility, if the swap dealer or major swap participant does not know the identity of the counterparty to the transaction prior to execution.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13e-2 [Reserved]
---

---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Gadi Aner, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 13, 2007

|/s/ Gadi Aner
Gadi AnerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (04-133)]


Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 1 et seq.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a 
NASA Nuclear Systems Strategic Roadmap Committee is necessary and in 
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon NASA by law. This determination follows consultation with 
the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: NASA Nuclear Systems Strategic Roadmap 
Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The Committee will advise the NASA 
Administrator on utilization of nuclear systems for the advancement of 
space science and exploration. The Committee will draw on the expertise 
of its members and other sources to provide its advice and 
recommendations to the Agency. The Committee will hold meetings and 
make site visits as necessary to accomplish their responsibilities. The 
Committee will function solely as an advisory board and will comply 
fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Lack of Duplication of Resources: The Committee's functions cannot 
be performed by the agency, another existing committee, or other means 
such as a public meeting.
    Fairly Balanced Membership: The Committee will consist of a balance 
of experts from within the government, private industry, and academia. 
In addition, there may be additional experts selected for Subcommittees 
or Task Forces. Members of the Committee, Subcommittee or Task Forces 
will be chosen from among industry, academia, and government with 
recognized knowledge and expertise in specific areas across the NASA 
portfolio. Total membership will reflect a fairly balanced view.
    Duration: Ad hoc.
    Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Marc Allen, Advanced Planning and 
Integration Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 
E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546, telephone (202) 358-2373.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-26962 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.3a12-1 Exemption of certain mortgages and interests in mortgages.

Mortgages, as defined in section 302(d) of the Emergency Home Finance Act of 1970, which are or have been sold by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation are hereby exempted from the operation of such provisions of the Act as by their terms do not apply to an “exempted security” or to “exempted securities”.

(Sec. 3(a)(12), 48 Stat. 882, 15 U.S.C. 78(c))

[37 FR 25167, Nov. 28, 1972]
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Nicholas Vita, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Director of Columbia Care Inc. (the “**Company**”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “**Report**”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 
/s/ Nicholas Vita
Nicholas Vita

Chief Executive Officer and Director

March 30, 2022
**
#### Karen A. Hayes, Respondent, v James F. Hayes, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[820 NYS2d 825]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Erin M. Peradotto, J.), entered April 25, 2005. The order denied defendant’s motion for additional temporary maintenance and pendente lite attorney’s fees.

*1160It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Kelly v Kelly,*19 AD3d 1104 [2005], *appeal dismissed*5 NY3d 847 [2005], *rearg denied and Iv dismissed in part and denied in part*6 NY3d 803 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Green, JJ.
### §2000ff–10. Regulations

Not later than 1 year after May 21, 2008, the Commission shall issue final regulations to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 110–233, title II, §211, May 21, 2008, 122 Stat. 920.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after May 21, 2008, see section 213 of Pub. L. 110–233, set out as a note under section 2000ff of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71802-71803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY:  Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Munitions system 
Reliability will meet in closed session on December 22, 2004, at SAIC, 
4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will review the 
efforts thus far to improve the reliability of munitions systems and 
identify additional steps to be taken to reduce the amount of 
unexploded ordnance resulting from munitions failures. The Taks Force 
will: conduct a methodologically sound assessment of the failure rates 
of U.S. munitions in actual combat use; review ongoing efforts to 
reduce the amount of unexploded ordnance resulting from munitions 
systems failures, and evaluate whether there are ways to improve or 
accelerate these efforts; and identify other feasible measures the U.S. 
can take to reduce the threat that failed munitions pose to friendly 
forces and noncombatants.
    The mission of the Defense Science board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: conduct a 
methodologically sound assessment of the failure rates of U.S. 
munitions in actual combat use; review ongoing efforts to reduce the 
amount of unexploded ordnance resulting from munitions systems 
failures, and evaluate whether there are ways to improve or accelerate 
these efforts; and identify other feasible measures the U.S. can take 
to reduce the threat that failed munitions pose to friendly forces and 
noncombatants.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2) it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that,

[[Page 71803]]

accordingly, these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: December 6, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-27123 Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
pursuant to Rule 15d-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep
Inc. (the "Company"), I, Steven Crowther, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
78o(d); and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated:  January 11, 2006                /s/ Steven Crowther
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven Crowther
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### John Baudassi et al., Respondents, v. Loren Battastoni, Appellant, Joseph Battastoni, Defendant, and Mary Fernandez, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Fernandez, Deceased, Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Mary C. Fernandez, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Fernandez, Deceased, Respondent, v. Loren Battastoni, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
### Part B—Subacute Care
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13e-101 [Reserved]
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

February 8 , 2024
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00763

- CV

AMINATO YAO AND YANNICK YAO , Appellant s
V. KINDER MORGAN, INC. , Appellee
On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No
. 4

Ha rris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1192834

- 102

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from an order signed October 10, 2023. On January 25, 2024, appellant s filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted

. W e dismiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.