alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: June 26, 2014 Presentation to Region 6 Federal Facilities Forum Regarding the 

Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A presentation was made by EPA to the Region 6 Federal Facilities Forum and the 

attendees listed below on June 26, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Participants : General Services Administration, US Army, US Air Force, Postal Service, Federal 

Aviation Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Bureau of Prisons

EPA Participant: Rob Lawrence (Region 6 Energy Policy Advisor)
§ 20.9 Sunset provision. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the sections of this part shall become ineffective and unenforceable upon a Commission finding that, through the issuance of an order, operating swap data repositories are processing positional data and that such processing will enable the Commission to effectively surveil trading in paired swaps and swaptions and paired swap and swaption markets.
( b ) The Commission may determine, in its discretion, to maintain the effectiveness and enforceability of any section of this part, or any requirement therein, in an order issued under paragraph (a) of this section, upon finding that such sections, or requirements therein, provide the Commission with positional data or data elements that materially improves the accuracy and surveillance utility of the positional data processed by swap data repositories.
§ 301.20 Fur products composed of pieces. ( a ) Where fur products, or fur mats and plates, are composed in whole or in substantial part of paws, tails, bellies, gills, ears, throats, heads, scrap pieces, or waste fur, such fact shall be disclosed as a part of the required information in labeling, invoicing, and advertising. Where a fur product is made of the backs of skins, such fact may be set out in labels, invoices, and advertising.
( b ) Where fur products, or fur mats and plates, are composed wholly or substantially of two or more of the parts set out in paragraph (a) of this section or one or more of such parts and other fur, disclosure in respect thereto shall be made by naming such parts or other fur in order of predominance by surface area.
( c ) The terms *substantial part* and *substantially* mean ten per centum (10 percent) or more in surface area.
( d ) The term *assembled* shall not be used in lieu of the terms set forth in paragraph (a) of this section to describe fur products or fur mats and plates composed of such parts.
[17 FR 6075, July 8, 1952, as amended at 79 FR 30458, May 28, 2014]
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
#### § 229.1001 (Item 1001) Summary term sheet.

*Summary term sheet.* Provide security holders with a summary term sheet that is written in plain English. The summary term sheet must briefly describe in bullet point format the most material terms of the proposed transaction. The summary term sheet must provide security holders with sufficient information to understand the essential features and significance of the proposed transaction. The bullet points must cross-reference a more detailed discussion contained in the disclosure document that is disseminated to security holders.

*Instructions to Item 1001:* 1. The summary term sheet must not recite all information contained in the disclosure document that will be provided to security holders. The summary term sheet is intended to serve as an overview of all material matters that are presented in the accompanying documents provided to security holders.

2. The summary term sheet must begin on the first or second page of the disclosure document provided to security holders.

3. Refer to Rule 421(b) and (d) of Regulation C of the Securities Act (§ 230.421 of this chapter) for a description of plain English disclosure.
### §14191. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXVII, §270001, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2089, which related to Presidential summit on violence in America, was omitted as obsolete.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3959 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3959

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Blue 94:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Basic Blue 94:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC BLUE 94:1.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Basic Blue 94:1,    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (1-Propanaminium,                                                  31/2014.......
                        3,3'-[(9,10-
                        dihydro-9,10-
                        dioxo-1,4-
                        anthracenediyl)di
                        imino]bis(N,N,N-
                        triethyl-, ethyl
                        sulfate (1:2))
                        (CAS No. 67905-14-
                        0) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3204.13.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/    DavidJ. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

May 10, 2005

----
§ 204.52 Notification of intent to collect. ( a ) *Notification before tax refund offset.* Reduction of an income tax refund will be made only after the Commission makes a determination that an amount is owed and past-due and gives or makes a reasonable attempt to give the debtor 60 days written notice of the intent to collect by tax refund offset.
( b ) *Contents of notice.* The Commission's notice of intent to collect by tax refund offset (Notice of Intent) will state: ( 1 ) The amount of the debt;
( 2 ) That unless the debt is repaid within 60 days from the date of the Commission's Notice of Intent, the Commission intends to collect the debt by requesting a reduction of any amounts payable to the debtor as a Federal income tax refund by an amount equal to the amount of the debt and all accumulated interest and other charges;
( 3 ) A mailing address for forwarding any written correspondence and a contact name and a telephone number for any questions; and
( 4 ) That the debtor may present evidence to the Commission that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable by: ( i ) Sending a written request for a review of the evidence to the address provided in the notice;
( ii ) Stating in the request the amount disputed and the reasons why the debtor believes that the debt is not past due or is not legally enforceable; and
( iii ) Including in the request any documents that the debtor wishes to be considered or stating that the additional information will be submitted within the remainder of the 60-day period.
( c ) To the extent that a debt owed has not been established by judicial or administrative order, a debtor may dispute the existence or amount of the debt or the terms of repayment. With respect to debts established by a judicial or administrative order, Commission review will be limited to issues concerning the payment or other discharge of the debt.
[58 FR 64372, Dec. 7, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54132, Oct. 26, 2001; 66 FR 56383, Nov. 7, 2001]
Exhibit 10.1


Annual Director Compensation


Board of
Directors:




	
  Board of Directors Annual
  Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  50,000

  	
   

  
	
  Board of Directors
  Quarterly Meeting Fee (attendance in person)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,500

  	
   

  
	
  Board of Directors
  Quarterly Meeting Fee (telephonic attendance)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,250

  	
   

  
	
  Lead Director Annual
  Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  100,000

  	
   

  
	
  Board of Directors
  Annual Option Award

  	
   

  	
  11,250

  	
   

  






 


Committees:




	
  Audit Committee Membership
  Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee Chair
  Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation Committee
  Membership Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  17,000

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation Committee
  Chair Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nominating and
  Governance Committee Membership

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  13,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nominating and Governance Committee Chair Annual Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26654]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces changes in the membership of the Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board for the Chemical Safety and 
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

DATES: Effective December 3, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Office of 
General Counsel, (202) 261-7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management, a performance review board (PRB). The PRB reviews 
initial performance ratings of members of the Senior Executive Services 
(SES) and makes recommendations on performance ratings and awards for 
senior executives. Because the CSB is a small independent Federal 
agency, the SES members of the CSB's PRB are being drawn from other 
Federal agencies.
    The Chairperson of the CSB has appointed the following individuals 
to the CSB Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board:
    PRB Member--Ronald S. Battocchi (General Counsel, National 
Transportation Safety Board).
    PRB Member--Elizabeth S. Woodruff (General Counsel, Federal 
Retirement Thrift Investment Board).
    The above-named members of the CSB PRB replace Dan Campbell 
(Managing Director, National Transportation Safety Board) and Kathleen 
O'Brien Ham (Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, Federal 
Communications Commission), whose service on the PRB has ended. Their 
appointments were originally announced in the Federal Register of 
October 8, 2003 (68 FR 58063).
    John S. Bresland (CSB Board Member) continues as Chair of the PRB, 
as announced in the Federal Register of October 8, 2003 (68 FR 58063).
    This notice is published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: November 29, 2004.
Raymond C. Porfiri,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-26654 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
### §16521. Report on energy integration with Latin America

The Secretary shall submit an annual report to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the United States House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate concerning the status of energy export development in Latin America and efforts by the Secretary and other departments and agencies of the United States to promote energy integration with Latin America. The report shall contain a detailed analysis of the status of energy export development in Mexico and a description of all significant efforts by the Secretary and other departments and agencies to promote a constructive relationship with Mexico regarding the development of that nation's energy capacity. In particular this report shall outline efforts the Secretary and other departments and agencies have made to ensure that regulatory approval and oversight of United States/Mexico border projects that result in the expansion of Mexican energy capacity are effectively coordinated across departments and with the Mexican government.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XVIII, §1807, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1124.)
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2014 - 0231 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM163AD

AMM 27 - 41 - 00 --- 4/2/13 MPD MTL 1.3 --- 7/8/13 604 - 27 - 032, R01 --- 4/29/13 604 - 27 - 032 --- 9/10/12 605 - 27 - 002, R01 --- 4/29/13 605 - 27 - 002 --- 9/10/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintain ed in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
```

[115th Congress Public Law 366]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5090]]

Public Law 115-366
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   3025 Woodgate Road in Montrose, Colorado, as the ``Sergeant David 
   Kinterknecht Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 6216]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT DAVID KINTERKNECHT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3025 Woodgate Road in Montrose, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant David Kinterknecht Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
David Kinterknecht Post Office''.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6216:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Nov. 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Keith Stauffer, Chief Financial Officer of TerrAscend Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:

 

|        |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |

 

|        |    |                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  |

 

|  

Date: March 17, 2022

  |                          |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                 | /s/ Keith Stauffer            |   |
|                                 | Keith Stauffer                |   |
|                                 | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                                 | (Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Smart, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I,
Robert Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.








Date:
April 14, 2009





/s/  Robert
Saunders


Robert
Saunders,


Chief
Executive Officer & President
No: 13-065 August 8, 2013

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Approves Probation For Georgia’s Agreement State Regulatory Program

The Commission has approved placing the state of Georgia on probation for deficiencies in its 

Agreement State program—the first time the NRC has taken such action. This move does not affect 

oversight of nuclear reactors in Georgia, which remain under NRC authority, or state responsibilities 

related to emergency preparedness at reactor sites.

Georgia is one of 37 states that have entered into agreements with the NRC giving them 

authority to license and regulate certain nuclear materials users within their borders. The agency 

reviews these Agreement State programs regularly. Probation is an option for ensuring continued 

protection of public health and safety in cases where program weaknesses exist. The weaknesses 

identified in Georgia do not immediately threaten public health and safety.

The managers of Georgia’s program are addressing the performance concerns. The program 

submitted an improvement plan that has been reviewed and approved by NRC staff. The NRC will 

remain closely involved with the state program managers as they implement improvements.

A review team comprised of technical staff from the NRC, North Carolina and Florida 

evaluated the Georgia program in October 2012. The team identified significant deficiencies throughout 

the program that, if left uncorrected, have the potential to impact public health and safety. The team 

observed a basic misunderstanding of several important safety and security requirements, and it noted 

significant communication issues between staff and management that affected the program’s safety 

culture and performance. Overall, the team identified a decline in performance since Georgia’s last 

evaluation in 2008.

The problems identified relate largely to prioritization of work, specifically responding to 

incidents promptly and prioritizing inspections of licensees using radioactive materials with the greatest 

potential for harm. The team found numerous examples where tasks were not appropriately prioritized.

The review found Georgia’s program to be compatible with the NRC regulatory program and 

“adequate but needs improvement.” The team recommended, and an NRC management review board 

agreed, that Georgia’s performance be found unsatisfactory for several performance indicators. The 

team made 11 specific recommendations to Georgia for improving performance. The report on 

Georgia’s agreement state program can be found here.

Pending the Commission’s decision, the state has been on “Heightened Oversight,” a condition 

requiring increased interaction with NRC staff, preparation of a program improvement plan, bimonthly 

conference calls and periodic status reports. The NRC will continue to interact more frequently with the 

state program office during probation. The Georgia program will be evaluated again in January 2014.
### §1304. Reservation of right to amend or repeal

The right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of this chapter is hereby reserved to the Congress.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1104, 49 Stat. 648.)