alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.16 Privilege against self-incrimination. Section 2.11 of Pub. L. 91-462 specifically repeals paragraph 7 of section 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Title 18, section 6002, of the United States Code provides that whenever a witness refuses, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or provide other information in a proceeding before or ancillary to: ( a ) A court or grand jury of the United States,
( b ) An agency of the United States, or
( c ) Either House of Congress, a joint committee of the two Houses, or a committee or a subcommittee of either House, and the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness an order issued under section 6004, the witness may not refuse to comply with the order on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination; but no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order. Title 18, section 6004, of the United States Code provides that: ( 1 ) In the case of any individual who has been or who may be called to testify or provide other information at any proceeding before an agency of the United States, the agency may, with the approval of the Attorney General, issue, in accordance with subsection (b) of section 6004, an order requiring the individual to give testimony or provide other information which he refused to give or provide on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, such order to become effective as provided in title 18, section 6002, of the United States Code;
( 2 ) An agency of the United States may issue an order under subsection (a) of section 6004 only if in its judgment ( i ) The testimony or other information from such individual may be necessary to the public interest; and
( ii ) Such individual has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide other information on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination.
(18 U.S.C. 6002, 6004)
[37 FR 5017, Mar. 9, 1972. Redesignated at 45 FR 36345, May 29, 1980]
###### Editorial Note on Part 140

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 140 appear at 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 140.75 Delegation of authority to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and to the Director of the Market Participants Division.

Pursuant to sections 2(a)(11), 8a(5) and 8(g) of the Act, the Commission hereby delegates to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and to the Director of the Market Participants Division and to such members of the Commission's staff acting under their direction as either Director may designate, the authority to disclose any registration information contained in the registration applications filed by Commission registrants or any compilation of such information maintained by the Commission to any department or agency of any State or any political subdivision thereof. Disclosure under this section may be made upon reasonable request made to the Commission or without request whenever the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk, the Director of the Market Participants Division, or any Commission employee designated by either Director to make disclosures under this section determines that such information may be appropriate for use by any department or agency of a State or political subdivision thereof. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, in any case in which the Director of Division of Clearing and Risk and Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight deems it appropriate, or in any case in which the Commission so requests, the Director may submit matter to the Commission for its consideration.

[48 FR 22136, May 17, 1983, as amended at 67 FR 62352, Oct. 7, 2002; 78 FR 22419, Apr. 16, 2013]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

At 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024, § 140.75 was amended by removing text “Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight” and adding in its place “Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk or the Director of the Market Participants Division”. However, the amendment could not be incorporated due to an error in the amendatory instruction.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7357

EDWIN CRUZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00185-jet) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edwin Cruz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cruz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Cruz’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
October 26, 2016 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the September 2016 monthly status 

report on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated 

carryover funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC 

activities in September 2016 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit in the case In re Aiken County regarding the licensing process for the U.S. 

Department of Energy’s Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Pete Olson 

Vice Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
No: II-15-037 May 21, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Meeting May 27 to Discuss Major Projects 

at Oconee Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, May 27, 

with Duke Energy officials to discuss the status of major projects at the Oconee nuclear power plant.

The Oconee plant, operated by Duke, is located near Seneca, S.C., about 30 miles west of 

Greenville.

The public session of the meeting is planned for 8 a.m. to about 3 p.m. with an hour break for 

lunch around 11:30. It is scheduled to be held in the Oconee Office Complex, 155 East Pickens 

Highway in Seneca. The public is invited to attend, and NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions after the business portion of the meeting (approximately 2:15 p.m.). 

The projects to be discussed include pending plant improvements designed to prevent or 

mitigate the effects of floods and tornadoes, the Oconee plant response to changes required after the 

2011 Fukushima accident in Japan and the status of a new service water system designed to cool some 

equipment in the plant. Planned upgrades to the nearby Keowee Hydroelectric Units, which provide 

backup power to the Oconee plant, will also be discussed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3620] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective November 3, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 3, 2005. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is June 6, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) 

Dated: November 18, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-26567 Filed 12-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### §§ 200.671-200.699 [Reserved]
### §16277. High-performance computation and supportive research

#### (a) Modeling and simulation

The Secretary shall carry out a program to enhance the capabilities of the United States to develop new reactor technologies through high-performance computation modeling and simulation techniques.

#### (b) Coordination

In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall coordinate with relevant Federal agencies as described by the National Strategic Computing Initiative established by Executive Order 13702 (80 Fed. Reg. 46177 (July 29, 2015)), while taking into account the following objectives:

(1) Using expertise from the private sector, institutions of higher education, and the National Laboratories to develop computational software and capabilities that prospective users may access to accelerate research and development of advanced nuclear reactor systems and reactor systems for space exploration.

(2) Developing computational tools to simulate and predict nuclear phenomena that may be validated through physical experimentation.

(3) Increasing the utility of the research infrastructure of the Department by coordinating with the Advanced Scientific Computing Research program within the Office of Science.

(4) Leveraging experience from the Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation.

(5) Ensuring that new experimental and computational tools are accessible to relevant research communities, including private sector entities engaged in nuclear energy technology development.

#### (c) Supportive research activities

The Secretary shall consider support for additional research activities to maximize the utility of the research facilities of the Department, including physical processes—

(1) to simulate degradation of materials and behavior of fuel forms; and

(2) for validation of computational tools.

#### (d) Duplication

The Secretary shall ensure the coordination of, and avoid unnecessary duplication of, the activities of the program under subsection (a) with the activities of—

(1) other research entities of the Department, including the National Laboratories, the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy, and the Advanced Scientific Computing Research program; and

(2) industry.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §957, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 888; Pub. L. 115–248, §2(g), Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3157; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title II, §2004, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2470.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 13702, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out as a note under section 5501 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–260 added subsec. (d).

2018—Pub. L. 115–248 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to survey and plan regarding alternatives to industrial radioactive sources.
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of CepTor Corporation, (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended June  30,  2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Donald W. Fallon, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                       |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

September 5, 2006

|  | /s/ DonaldW.Fallon                                DonaldW. FallonChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,Finance and Administration andSecretary |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### § 1502.43 Reconsideration and stay of Commission's action.

Following notice or publication of the final decision, a participant may petition the Commission for reconsideration of any part or all of the decision or may petition for a stay of the decision.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin Kopf, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Michael ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51420

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 19, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Michael Robinson appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release, arguing that his 24-month sentence was unreasonable. The district court twice modified Robinson’s terms of release, but Robinson continued to violate the terms of his supervision. The record reflects that the district court properly considered the 18 *278U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Robinson’s sentence. *See United States v. Gonzalez,*250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001). Robinson’s sentence, which was the statutory maximum, was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. *See United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 156.1 Definition.

For the purposes of this part, the term *broker association* as applied to each board of trade shall include two or more contract market members with floor trading privileges, of whom at least one is acting as a floor broker, who: (1) Engage in floor brokerage activity on behalf of the same employer, (2) have an employer and employee relationship which relates to floor brokerage activity, (3) share profits and losses associated with their brokerage or trading activity, or (4) regularly share a deck of orders.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3943 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACETIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (Acetic acid, cyano-[3-[(6- 

methoxy-2- 

benzothiazolyl)amino]amino]- 

1H-isoindol-1-ylidene]-, 

pentyl ester) (CAS No. 

173285–74–0) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.11.35) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3943 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| Index | Abstract | Introduction| Summary of Alternatives and Impacts | Tables | Maps | Libraries | PDF File | Comments |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| To reduce download times, the document has been broken up into smaller, separate files.
Get Adobe Acrobat Reader **Text**478KB**Tables**50KB**Alternative 1**539KB**Alternative 2**499KB**Alternative 3**2.4MB**Alternative 4**859KB**Alternative 5**603KB**Alternative 6**642MB**Alternative 7**2.4MB
| Index | Abstract | Introduction| Summary of Alternatives and Impacts | Tables | Maps | Libraries | PDF File | Comments | |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00411

- CR

Shandon KHABAZIAN,

Appell ant

v.

STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8957

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State ’ s Motion for Exte n sion of Time to File Brief is hereby

GRANTED . The appellant ’ s brief is due on February 18, 2020.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court