alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft 

Confederation suisse 

Confederazione Svizzera 

Confederaziun svizra 

FOCA CH-3003 Bern 

By Fax and Mail 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director, Office for International Aviation 

Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and 

Communications DETEC 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA 

Aviation Policy and Strategy 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, S.w., Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

USA 

Reference: 0/01/01-02.02 .187 

Your reference: 

Our reference: fjl 

Contact person: Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Tel. +41313230410, Fax +41313259212, laurenceJonlana-jungo@bazl.admin,ch 

Ittigen, 26 August 2010 

Declaration of Reciprocity 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith declares, that it will consider applications 

by U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland in accordance with the 

provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the United States of 

America, dated 21 June 2010, and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to the Agreement, on 

the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

Director 

Head Aviation Policy and Strategy 

l 

Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Chief Negotiator Air Services Agreements 

Legal and International Affairs 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation 

MOhlestrasse 3, 3063lttigen 

Postal address: CH-3003 Bern 

Tel. +41313258039/40, Fax +41313258032 

www.avialion.admin.ch
### §12754. Limitation on jurisdictions under court order

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that funds provided under this part are not employed to carry out housing remedies or to pay fines, penalties, or costs associated with an action in which—

(1) a participating jurisdiction has been adjudicated, by a Federal, State, or local court, to be in violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], the Fair Housing Act [42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.], or any other Federal, State, or local law promoting fair housing or prohibiting discrimination, or

(2) a settlement has been entered into in any case where claims of such violations have been asserted against a participating jurisdiction, except to the extent permitted by subsection (b).

#### (b) Remedial use of funds permitted

In the case of settlement described in subsection (a)(2), a jurisdiction may use funds provided under this Act to carry out housing remedies with eligible activities.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §224, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4113.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–625, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4079, known as the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12701 of this title and Tables.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of this title and Tables.

The Fair Housing Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is title VIII of Pub. L. 90–284, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 81, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§3601 et seq.) of chapter 45 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3601 of this title and Tables.
§ 230.172 Delivery of prospectuses. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 60083 , July 24, 2024.
( a ) *Sending confirmations and notices of allocations.* After the effective date of a registration statement, the following are exempt from the provisions of section 5(b)(1) of the Act if the conditions set forth in paragraph (c) of this section are satisfied: ( 1 ) Written confirmations of sales of securities in an offering pursuant to a registration statement that contain information limited to that called for in Rule 10b-10 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 240.10b-10 of this chapter) and other information customarily included in written confirmations of sales of securities, which may include notices provided pursuant to Rule 173 (§ 230.173); and
( 2 ) Notices of allocation of securities sold or to be sold in an offering pursuant to the registration statement that may include information identifying the securities (including the CUSIP number) and otherwise may include only information regarding pricing, allocation and settlement, and information incidental thereto.
( b ) *Transfer of the security.* Any obligation under section 5(b)(2) of the Act to have a prospectus that satisfies the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act precede or accompany the carrying or delivery of a security in a registered offering is satisfied if the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section are met.
( c ) *Conditions.* ( 1 ) The registration statement relating to the offering is effective and is not the subject of any pending proceeding or examination under section 8(d) or 8(e) of the Act;
( 2 ) Neither the issuer, nor an underwriter or participating dealer is the subject of a pending proceeding under section 8A of the Act in connection with the offering; and
( 3 ) The issuer has filed with the Commission a prospectus with respect to the offering that satisfies the requirements of section 10(a) of the Act or the issuer will make a good faith and reasonable effort to file such a prospectus within the time required under Rule 424 (§ 230.424) and, in the event that the issuer fails to file timely such a prospectus, the issuer files the prospectus as soon as practicable thereafter.
( 4 ) The condition in paragraph (c)(3) of this section shall not apply to transactions by dealers requiring delivery of a final prospectus pursuant to section 4(3) of the Act.
( d ) *Exclusions.* This section shall not apply to any: ( 1 ) Offering of any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 *et seq.*), other than a registered closed-end investment company;
( 2 ) A business combination transaction as defined in § 230.165(f)(1) (Rule 165(f)(1)); or
( 3 ) Offering registered on Form S-8 (§ 239.16b of this chapter).
[70 FR 44808, Aug. 3, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 33353, June 1, 2020]
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- 14083 -- MATRITECH, INC. -- EXHIBIT 4.1 TO FORM 8-K


    EXHIBIT
      4.1

    


    


    AMENDMENT

    TO

    CERTIFICATE
      OF DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RIGHTS OF 

    SERIES
      A
      CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK 

    OF

    MATRITECH,
      INC.

    


    FILED
      IN
      THE SECRETARY OF 

    STATE
      OF
      DELAWARE ON MARCH 4, 2005

    


    


    Matritech,
      Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”),

    


    DOES
      HEREBY CERTIFY (Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation
      Law):

    


    1.    The
      name
      of the Corporation is Matritech, Inc.;

    


    2.    That
      a
      Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible
      Preferred Stock of Matritech, Inc. (the “Certificate”) was filed with the
      Secretary of State of Delaware on March 4, 2005;

    


    3.    That
      pursuant to the provisions of Section 9 of the Certificate, the Corporation
      and
      the holders of at least 75% of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock have
      consented in writing to amend the Certificate as follows:

    


    To
      delete
      subsection (c) of Section 6 in its entirety and substitute in place thereof
      the
      following:

    


    “(c) incur,
      assume or suffer to exist any indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of
      $7,500,000 in the aggregate, other than indebtedness incurred pursuant to a
      receivable or equipment lease financing and indebtedness outstanding on March
      4,
      2005 which has not been subsequently amended to increase the amount of
      indebtedness or the interest rate applicable thereto;”

    



    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    


    IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF, said Matritech, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be signed by Stephen
      D. Chubb, its Chief Executive Officer, this 13th day of January,
      2006.

    


    
      	 	 	 
	 	MATRITECH,
              INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ Stephen
              D. Chubb
	 	
              
Name:
              Stephen D. Chubb
	 	
              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.735-5 Securities transactions.

Securities transactions by members and employees must comply with the provisions of 5 CFR 4401.102 (Prohibited and restricted financial interests and transactions).

[75 FR 42277, July 20, 2010]
### §1714. Legal services

No claim for legal services or for any other services rendered in respect of a claim or award for compensation under subchapter I to or on account of any person shall be valid unless approved by the Secretary; and any claim so approved shall, in the manner and to the extent fixed by the said Secretary, be paid out of the compensation payable to the claimant; and any person who receives any fee, other consideration, or any gratuity on account of services so rendered, unless such consideration or gratuity is so approved, or who solicits employment for another person or for himself in respect of any claim or award for compensation under subchapter I shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall, for each offense, be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Dec. 2, 1942, ch. 668, title II, §204, 56 Stat. 1034.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of Labor, see note set out under section 1711 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL W.
PALKOVIC                                              
|Michael W. Palkovic Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 4, 2004
### §1603. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts July 13, 1943, ch. 221, title II, §1, 57 Stat. 513; June 28, 1944, ch. 302, title II, §1, 58 Stat. 566; July 3, 1945, ch. 263, title II, 59 Stat. 376; July 26, 1946, ch. 672, title II, §201, 60 Stat. 697; July 8, 1947, ch. 210, title II, §201, 61 Stat. 276, which authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to transfer to constituent organizations of the Federal Security Agency requested amounts from appropriations for traveling expenses and printing and binding, Federal Security Agency, and to retransfer to such appropriations, was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.
* Under 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except in

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40531

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-95-CR-127-3

- - - - - - - - - -

August 14, 1998

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Cruz appeals his jury conviction of conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the

district court’s jury instruction did not adequately advise the

jury of the participation element of the offense. 

Cruz did not object to the jury charge in the district

court. We review this issue for plain error. See United States

v. Mitchell, 31 F.3d 271, 276 (5th Cir. 1994). The district

court instructed the jury that conspiracy consisted of these

elements: 1) an agreement between two parties to commit an 
No. 97-40531

-2-

illegal act; 2) knowledge of the unlawful nature of the

agreement; and 3) a voluntary joining of the agreement with the

intent to further its unlawful purpose. This instruction was

sufficient to advise the jury of the participation element of the

offense. The district court did not commit plain error. See

Mitchell, 31 F.3d at 276; see also United States v. Calverley, 37

F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc)(citing United States v.

Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 730-35 (1993)). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Den Europæiske Unions L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0634 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | L 199 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Retsforskrifter | 61. årgang7. august 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0634

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

L 199

Dansk udgave

Retsforskrifter

61. årgang7. august 2018

---

| Indhold | | II   Ikke-lovgivningsmæssige retsakter | Side |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONALE AFTALER |
| | * | Meddelelse om ikrafttrædelsen af aftalen mellem Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Norge om administrativt samarbejde, bekæmpelse af svig og inddrivelse af fordringer på momsområdet | 1 |

Indhold

II   Ikke-lovgivningsmæssige retsakter

Side

INTERNATIONALE AFTALER

*

Meddelelse om ikrafttrædelsen af aftalen mellem Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Norge om administrativt samarbejde, bekæmpelse af svig og inddrivelse af fordringer på momsområdet

1

| DA | De akter, hvis titel er trykt med magre typer, er løbende retsakter inden for rammerne af landbrugspolitikken og har normalt en begrænset gyldighedsperiode.
  Titlen på alle øvrige akter er trykt med fede typer efter en asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

DA

De akter, hvis titel er trykt med magre typer, er løbende retsakter inden for rammerne af landbrugspolitikken og har normalt en begrænset gyldighedsperiode.

Titlen på alle øvrige akter er trykt med fede typer efter en asterisk.

---

II Ikke-lovgivningsmæssige retsakter

INTERNATIONALE AFTALER

| 7.8.2018 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

L 199/1

---

Meddelelse om ikrafttrædelsen af aftalen mellem Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Norge om administrativt samarbejde, bekæmpelse af svig og inddrivelse af fordringer på momsområdet

Efter undertegnelsen den 6. februar 2018 meddelte Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Norge hinanden (henholdsvis den 9. juli og den 26. juni 2018), at de havde afsluttet deres interne retlige procedurer som omhandlet i aftalens artikel 44, stk. 1 (1).

1

Aftalen træder i kraft den 1. september 2018 i henhold til dennes artikel 44, stk. 2.

---

(1)  Aftale mellem Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Norge om administrativt samarbejde, bekæmpelse af svig og inddrivelse af fordringer på momsområdet (EUT L 195 af 1.8.2018, s. 3).

1

---
### §17255. Safety research

#### (a) Program

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall conduct a research program to address public health, safety, and environmental impacts that may be associated with capture, injection, and sequestration of greenhouse gases in geologic reservoirs.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for carrying out this section $5,000,000 for each fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VII, §707, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1710.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0518**  Docket Number
**20 09**  **- SW**  **- 021**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Agusta Bollet tino Tecnico No. 109 - 129, dated February 16, 2009.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mitchell Stern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MITCHELL
STERN                               
|Mitchell Stern President and Chief Executive Officer



November 4, 2004
### §18614. Technology transfer and transitions assessment

Not later than 1 year after September 28, 2018, and as often as the Secretary determines to be necessary thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes recommended changes to the policy of the Department and legislative changes to section 16391 of this title to improve the ability of the Department to successfully transfer new energy technologies to the private sector.

(Pub. L. 115–246, title I, §106, Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3132.)
### §17031. Biodiesel

#### (a) Biodiesel study

Not later than 180 days after December 19, 2007, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall submit to Congress a report on any research and development challenges inherent in increasing the proportion of diesel fuel sold in the United States that is biodiesel.

#### (b) Material for the establishment of standards

The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in consultation with the Secretary, shall make publicly available the physical property data and characterization of biodiesel and other biofuels as appropriate.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title II, §221, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1533.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ANTHONY ROBINSON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 316 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
No: III-16-014 June 13, 2016

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Open House to Discuss Agency’s Assessment of 

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open house on June 21 to discuss the 

agency’s annual review of safety performance at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant. The plant is 

operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., and is located in Oak Harbor, Ohio, about 20 miles 

southeast of Toledo.

The public will be able to talk with NRC staff members and ask questions about the plant’s 

2015 performance and the agency’s oversight of the facility. The open house, which will also include 

informational posters, is scheduled for 6-7:30 p.m. EDT at the Carroll Township Service Complex, 

11080 W. Toussaint East Rd., in Oak Harbor. 

“NRC inspectors who work at the plant and NRC staff from our regional office in Lisle, Ill., are 

looking forward to speaking with members of the public about the performance of the Davis-Besse

plant and other topics related to nuclear safety that are of interest to the community,” said 

NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “We hold such meetings near the plant every year 

to discuss how we ensure the plant operates safely and foster an open dialogue with the public.”

Overall, Davis-Besse operated safely in 2015. All performance indicators for the plant were 

“green.” However, the plant was in Column 2 of the action matrix, during the first, second and fourth 

quarters due to one or more greater-than-green security inspection findings. The NRC found the plant 

had taken immediate compensatory actions to address the issues that led to the findings.

The first security issue occurred in the third quarter of 2014 and was carried over into 2015. 

NRC inspections found the plant had taken appropriate corrective actions and moved the plant into 

Column 1 at the beginning of the third quarter of 2015. The second security issue, unrelated to the first 

issue, moved the plant back into Column 2 at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. The NRC will 

conduct an additional follow up inspection later in the year.

The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant performance and agency response. There are five 

columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a baseline level of inspections. A move to the other 

columns results in an increased level of NRC oversight and inspections.

Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant, inspection 

specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and specialists from the agency’s headquarters in 
Page | 2

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of performance to be inspected this year by NRC inspectors are 

activities associated with radiological safety, equipment designs, and emergency preparedness.

The NRC’s 2015 assessment letter and current performance information for Unit 1 is available 

on the NRC website.