alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Daniel D. Delano, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sardy House,LLC;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
               (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: February 13, 2004
 /S/ DANIEL D. DELANO
### §16914. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16914 was editorially reclassified as section 20914 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 210.6A-01 Application of §§ 210.6A-01 to 210.6A-05. ( a ) Sections 210.6A-01 to 210.6A-05 shall be applicable to financial statements filed for employee stock purchase, savings and similar plans.
( b ) [Reserved]
[47 FR 56843, Dec. 21, 1982]
<PAGE>
                                                                       Ex. 10.33

        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF CALL OPTION AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: F Room 1003,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPANT SHAREHOLDER"), and SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD.
limited liability company (registered address: Room 809, 81 Wencui Rd,
Shengyang) (hereinafter the "NEW TARGET COMPANY"), as independent party, hereby
agree to participate in the Call Option Agreement among FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY
(SHANGHAI) CO., LTD. (hereinafter "FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY"), SHANGHAI FOCUS
MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD. and other relevant parties (hereinafter, "EQUITY
PLEDGE AGREEMENT") and other parties dated March 28 2005. The Participant
Shareholder hereby grant Focus Media Technology with an irrevocable equity Call
Option (hereinafter "CALL OPTION") in respect to 70 % of the equity share of New
Target Company held by this company. Once this Acknowledgement Letter is
executed by this company, the New Target Company and the newly increase equity
share begin to be the "Target Company" and "Option Equity" defined under the
Call Option Agreement (hereinafter the "CALL OPTION AGREEMENT") entered into
between this company, Focus Media Technology and other relevant parties dated
March 28 2005; and this company immediately make the same representations and
warranties in respect to the New Target Company and relevant equity Call Option
as this company made under the Call Option Agreement in respect to the defined
Target Company and Call Option.

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT
CO., LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT
CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

<PAGE>


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI)
CO., LTD.
(Company chop)


Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              --------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Legal Representative
Date: January 13, 2006


                                        2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSHUA T. GROOMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-4144

December 15, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Stephen Mathew 

Whyte, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

__________________________
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Kamilah N. Grant, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[819 NYS2d 355]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 6, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a family monitor for an agency which provided housing and support for homeless families. Claimant’s employment was terminated when her supervisors became aware that she had been using one of the agency’s clients as a babysitter and had provided that client with crack cocaine to sell to other clients. Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge, among other things, disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct. Upon administrative review, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board upheld the determination, prompting this appeal by claimant.

We affirm. It is well settled that an employee’s failure to comply with an employer’s established policies which may be detrimental to the interests of the employer may constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Ochs [Commissioner of Labor],*21 AD3d 1196, 1197 [2005]; *Matter of Oberferst [Commissioner of Labor],*17 AD3d 902, 902 [2005]; *Matter of Kaissar [Commissioner of Labor],*3 AD3d 829, 830 [2004]). The hearing testimony of the client involved and that of claimant’s supervisors provide substantial evidence supporting the Board’s determination that claimant engaged in the above-described activities. Moreover, these activities clearly violate the employer’s policies which prohibit employees from estabhshing personal or private relationships with clients that could be detrimental to either the Ghent’s or the employer’s interests.

*564Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Trevon L. Armstrong, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 924]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Robert C. Noonan, J. — Attempted Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### § 1118.11 Nonexclusive delegation of power.

No provision contained herein delegating any of the Commission's powers shall be construed as limiting the authority of the Commission to exercise the same powers.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Denis McCarthy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 25, 2007 |  | /s/ Denis McCarthy     
|                   |  | Denis McCarthy         
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Informational Session

    The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases announces 
that an informational Session for individuals representing groups 
considering submission of applications in response to NIAID's RFA 
number AI-04-045 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AI-04-045.html), entitled ``CENTERS FOR MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST 
RADIATION,'' will be held on December 15, 2004, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
e.s.t.
    The meeting will be held in Room 2C-13, 10401 Fernwood Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817. Staff from the NIH Centers for Medical 
Countermeasures Against Radiation Program and from the Division of 
Extramural Activities will provide information about the Program and 
how to apply and will be available to answer questions pertinent to 
preparing applications in response to this RFA. Advance registration is 
not required.
    This meeting will also be available through a live broadcast 
allowing for questions from offsite locations. Please check http://videocast.nih.gov/FutureEvents.asp for videocast information regarding 
this event. A videotape of the meeting will be made available for 
future viewing at http://videocast.nih.gov/PastEvents.asp.
    For questions or further information contact: Helen Quill, Ph.D., 
Basic Immunology Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology and 
Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
Room 3013, MSC-6601, 6610 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-6601, 
telephone: 301-496-7551, Fax: 301-480-2381, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac2dbdfc3c6c6eac4c3cbc3ce84c4c3c284cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="026a73776b6e6e426c6b636b662c6c6b6a2c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
Lynn C. Hellinger,
Associate Director for Management and Operations, NIAID.
[FR Doc. 04-26900 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Civil No. 2461⁄2.]

#### ANDREW GARRETT et al., Appellants, v. DANIEL CLEARY et al., Appellees.

APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. William H. Barnes, Judge.

Herring & Herring, for Appellants,

James Reilly, for Appellees.

February 11, 1889.

Affirmed.
§ 229.1119 (Item 1119) Affiliations and certain relationships and related transactions. ( a ) Describe if so, and how, the sponsor, depositor or issuing entity is an affiliate (as defined in § 230.405 of this chapter) of any of the following parties as well as, to the extent known and material, if so, and how, any of the following parties are affiliates of any of the other following parties: ( 1 ) Servicer contemplated by Item 1108(a)(3) of this Regulation AB.
( 2 ) Trustee.
( 3 ) Originator contemplated by Item 1110 of this Regulation AB.
( 4 ) Significant obligor contemplated by Item 1112 of this Regulation AB.
( 5 ) Enhancement or support provider contemplated by Items 1114 or 1115 of this Regulation AB.
( 6 ) Any other material parties related to the asset-backed securities contemplated by Item 1100(d)(1) of this Regulation AB.
( 7 ) Asset representations reviewer.
( b ) Describe whether there is, and if so the general character of, any business relationship, agreement, arrangement, transaction or understanding that is entered into outside the ordinary course of business or is on terms other than would be obtained in an arm's length transaction with an unrelated third party, apart from the asset-backed securities transaction, between the sponsor, depositor or issuing entity and any of the parties in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section, or any affiliates of such parties, that currently exists or that existed during the past two years and that is material to an investor's understanding of the asset-backed securities. *Instruction to Item 1119(b):* What is required is information material to an investor's understanding of the asset-backed securities. A detailed description or itemized listing of all commercial relationships among the parties is not required. Instead, the disclosure should indicate whether any relationships outside of the asset-backed securities transaction do exist that are outside the normal course and the general character of those relationships.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, describe, to the extent material, any specific relationships involving or relating to the asset-backed securities transaction or the pool assets, including the material terms and approximate dollar amount involved, between the sponsor, depositor or issuing entity and any of the parties in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section, or any affiliates of such parties, that currently exists or that existed during the past two years.
*Instruction to Item 1119:* With respect to disclosure in an annual report on Form 10-K, information required by this Item 1119 may be omitted to the extent that substantially the same information had been provided previously in an annual report on Form 10-K (§ 249.310) for the asset-backed securities or in an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or a prospectus timely filed pursuant to § 230.424 of this chapter under the same Central Index Key (CIK) code as the current annual report on Form 10-K.
[70 FR 1597, Jan. 7, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 57315, Sept. 24, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense

# AGENCY:

Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, January 14, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Eric Carr, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to the Director of Defense Research  and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military  Departments in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices.

The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.

In accordance with section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. section 10(d)), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: December 24, 2003.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-27  Filed 1-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
### §16235. Renewable energy in public buildings

#### (a) Demonstration and technology transfer program

The Secretary shall establish a program for the demonstration of innovative technologies for solar and other renewable energy sources in buildings owned or operated by a State or local government, and for the dissemination of information resulting from such demonstration to interested parties.

#### (b) Limit on Federal funding

Notwithstanding section 16352 of this title, the Secretary shall provide under this section no more than 40 percent of the incremental costs of the solar or other renewable energy source project funded.

#### (c) Requirements

As part of the application for awards under this section, the Secretary shall require all applicants—

(1) to demonstrate a continuing commitment to the use of solar and other renewable energy sources in buildings they own or operate; and

(2) to state how they expect any award to further their transition to the significant use of renewable energy.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §935, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 873.)
§ 210.5-01 Application of §§ 210.5-01 to 210.5-04. Sections 210.5-01 to 210.5-04 shall be applicable to financial statements filed for all persons except— ( a ) Registered investment companies (see§§ 210.6-01 through 210.6-11).
( b ) Employee stock purchase, savings and similar plans (see §§ 210.6A-01 to 210.6A-05).
( c ) Insurance companies (see §§ 210.7-01 to 210.7-05).
( d ) Bank holding companies and banks (see §§ 210.9-01 to 210.9-07).
( e ) Brokers and dealers when filing Form X-17A-5 [249.617] (see §§ 240.17a-5 and 240.17a-10 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
[50 FR 49533, Dec. 3, 1985, as amended at 85 FR 54064, Aug. 31, 2020]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3925 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Disperse Blue 77. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Disperse 

Blue 77. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 77. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.51 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2014’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### §§ 23.1-23.20 [Reserved]