alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12213. Severability

Should any provision in this chapter be found to be unconstitutional by a court of law, such provision shall be severed from the remainder of the chapter, and such action shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining provisions of the chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, §515, formerly §514, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 378; renumbered §515, Pub. L. 110–325, §6(a)(2), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3558.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.
July 9, 2015 

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M150707 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – INFORMATION BRIEFING ON 

INSPECTIONS, TESTS, ANALYSES, AND ACCEPTANCE 

CRITERIA (ITAAC), 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2015, 

COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT 

NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by an external panel and a panel of NRC staff on Inspections, 

Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC), including industry and staff activities related 

to completing ITAAC, conducting ITAAC inspections, and verification of ITAAC completion. The 

external panel included Alan Torres, General Manager of Nuclear Construction, South Carolina 

Electric & Gas Company; and Mark Rauckhorst, Vice President of Construction, Vogtle Units 3 

and 4, Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Inc. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 971.414 Modification of permit terms, conditions, and restrictions. ( a ) After issuance or transfer of any permit, the Administrator, after consultation with appropriate Federal agencies and the permittee, may modify the TCRs in a permit for the following purposes: ( 1 ) To avoid unreasonable interference with the interests of other nations in their exercise of the freedoms of the high seas, as recognized under general principles of international law. This determination will take into account the considerations listed in § 971.403;
( 2 ) If relevant data and information (including, but not limited to, data resulting from activities under a permit) indicate that modification is required to protect the quality of the environment or to promote the safety of life and property at sea;
( 3 ) To avoid a conflict with any international obligation of the United States, established by any treaty or convention in force with respect to the United States, as determined in writing by the President; or
( 4 ) To avoid any situation which may reasonably be expected to lead to a breach of international peace and security involving armed conflict, as determined in writing by the President.
( b ) A proposal by the Administrator to modify the TCRs in a permit is significant and must be followed by the full application procedures in this part, including a public hearing, if it would result in either of the changes identified in § 971.412(b).
( c ) All proposed modifications other than those described in paragraph (b) of this section will be acted on after the Administrator provides: ( 1 ) Written notice of the proposal to the permittee; and
( 2 ) Publication of this proposal in the Federal Register with a 60-day opportunity for comment.
( d ) ( 1 ) The Administrator will effect a modification of the TCRs if the Administrator finds in writing that the proposed modification will comply with the requirements of the Act and this part.
( 2 ) Upon adopting a TCR modification, the Administrator shall issue to the permittee an amended permit including the modified TCRs, and shall publish notice of issuance in the Federal Register.
( 3 ) The procedures for objection to modification of the TCRs are the same as those for objection to a TCR under § 971.411 of this part.
### §16298. Carbon utilization program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercialization relating to carbon utilization.

#### (b) Activities

Under the program described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

(1) assess and monitor—

(A) potential changes in lifecycle carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions; and

(B) other environmental safety indicators of new technologies, practices, processes, or methods used in enhanced hydrocarbon recovery as part of the activities authorized under section 16293 of this title;

(2) identify and evaluate novel uses for carbon (including conversion of carbon oxides) that, on a full lifecycle basis, achieve a permanent reduction, or avoidance of a net increase, in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, for use in commercial and industrial products such as—

(A) chemicals;

(B) plastics;

(C) building materials;

(D) fuels;

(E) cement;

(F) products of coal utilization in power systems or in other applications; and

(G) other products with demonstrated market value;

(3) identify and assess carbon capture technologies for industrial systems; and

(4) identify and assess alternative uses for coal that result in zero net emissions of carbon dioxide or other pollutants, including products derived from carbon engineering, carbon fiber, and coal conversion methods.

#### (c) Prioritization

In supporting demonstration and commercialization research under the program described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize consideration of projects that—

(1) have access to a carbon dioxide emissions stream generated by a stationary source in the United States that is capable of supplying not less than 250 metric tons per day of carbon dioxide for research;

(2) have access to equipment for testing small-scale carbon dioxide utilization technologies, with onsite access to larger test bays for scale-up; and

(3) have 1 or more existing partnerships with a National Laboratory, an institution of higher education, a private company, or a State or other government entity.

#### (d) Coordination

The Secretary shall coordinate the activities authorized under this section with the activities authorized in section 16298a of this title as part of a single consolidated program of the Department.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $50,000,000, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §969, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. S, §102(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2248.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26180]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2004 / 
Notices

[[Page 68875]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Yreka, California, December 13, 2004. The meeting will include routine 
business, presentations of larger scale project concept papers, and the 
review and recommendation for implementation of submitted project 
proposals.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 13, 2004, from 4:30 p.m. until 
7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, 
Preece Way, Yreka, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Hall, RAC Coordinator, Klamath 
National Forest, (530) 841-4468 or electronically at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6b60616e636b676e63634f697c21696a6b217a7c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8aca7a6a9a4aca0a9a4a488aebbe6aeadace6bdbb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: November 19, 2004.
Margaret J. Boland,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 04-26180 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 230.508 Insignificant deviations from a term, condition or requirement of Regulation D. ( a ) A failure to comply with a term, condition or requirement of § 230.504 or § 230.506 will not result in the loss of the exemption from the requirements of section 5 of the Act for any offer or sale to a particular individual or entity, if the person relying on the exemption shows: ( 1 ) The failure to comply did not pertain to a term, condition or requirement directly intended to protect that particular individual or entity; and
( 2 ) The failure to comply was insignificant with respect to the offering as a whole, provided that any failure to comply with paragraph (c) of § 230.502, paragraph (b)(2) of § 230.504 and paragraph (b)(2)(i) of § 230.506 shall be deemed to be significant to the offering as a whole; and
( 3 ) A good faith and reasonable attempt was made to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of § 230.504 or § 230.506.
( b ) A transaction made in reliance on § 230.504 or § 230.506 shall comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of Regulation D. Where an exemption is established only through reliance upon paragraph (a) of this section, the failure to comply shall nonetheless be actionable by the Commission under section 20 of the Act.
[54 FR 11374, Mar. 20, 1989, as amended at 57 FR 36473, Aug. 13, 1992; 81 FR 83553, Nov. 21, 2016]
Subpart 529.1 - General

Parent topic: Part 529 - Taxes

529.101 Policy.

Action may not be taken on any matters involving taxes on Federal purchases or contracts without

obtaining legal review. See ADM 5000.4A for the requirement to obtain legal review by the Office of

General Counsel (OGC) for agency actions. See FAR 29.101 (b) through (d) for the type of tax-related

issues that require legal review.
### §14116. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14116 was editorially reclassified as section 12576 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
SCWC-11-0001034 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

FRANCISCO ALVAREZ, Respondent/Claimant-Appellee,

vs. KYO-YA, INC., dba SHERATON WAIKIKI HOTEL, Respondent/Employer-Appellee,

and FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD., Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee, and ADJUSTING SERVICES OF HAWAII, INC., Respondent/Third-Party Administrator-Appellee,

vs. EMERSON M.F. JOU, M.D., Petitioner/Intervenor-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-00001034; AB NO. 2009-305 (2-94-05744)) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0001034 18-JAN-2013 10:22 AMORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Sakamoto, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

Petitioner/Intervenor-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on December 20, 2012, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 18, 2013. Stephen M. Shaw for petitioner Laurie E. Keeno for respondents Kyo-ya, Inc., dba Sheraton Waikiki Hotel and First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Karl K. Sakamoto

2
### §15204. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Public safety officer

The term "public safety officer" means a person serving a public agency, with or without compensation, as a firefighter, law enforcement officer, or emergency services officer, as determined by the Attorney General. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "law enforcement officer" includes a person who is a corrections or court officer or a civil defense officer.

#### (2) State

The term "State" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 107–12, §5, May 30, 2001, 115 Stat. 22.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in introductory provisions, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–12, May. 30, 2001, 115 Stat. 20, known as the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Act of 2001, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15201 of this title and Tables.
### §§17827 to 17829. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 17827, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1112, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4811, provided an exception to alternative fuel procurement requirement. See section 30310 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 17828, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1116, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4813, related to cooperative unmanned aerial vehicle activities. See section 31504 of Title 51.

Section 17829, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1117, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4813, related to development of enhanced-use lease policy. See section 31505 of Title 51.
J

- A16044

- 15

NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
JAMES SCOTT DUNLOP, SUSAN A.R. DUNLOP, ITF APRIL GR AYCE DUNLOP, ITF ELISE ODETTE DUN LOP IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.
JAMES BOLLINGER, M.D

.
APPEAL OF: JAMES SC OTT DUNLOP No. 3359 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered October 23 , 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County Civil Division at No(s): 2013

- 08593

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J. *

JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED MAY 18, 2015
James Scott Dunlop, et al. , appeal, pro se , from the order of the Court
of Common Pleas of Chester County entered October 23, 2014. For the
following reasons, we quash the appeal.
On January 15, 2014, a judgment of non pros was entered against
Appellants, and in favor of Appellee, James Bollinger, M.D. Appellants filed a
petition to open the judgment of non pros , which the trial court denied by
order entered September 3, 2014. 1 This was an appealable order pursuant

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 The record indicates that copies of the order were sent to counsel and unrepresented parties on that date.J

- A16044

- 15

- 2

-

to Pa.R.A.P. 311(a). Accordingly, the thirty

- day period within which to file
an appeal began to run on that date. See Pa.R.A.P. 902(a).
Rather than filing a timely notice of ap peal, Appellants filed a “Petition
to Open Judgment of Non Pros in Consideration of Plaintiffs’ Answer to
Counsel for Defendant’s ‘Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Petition to Open Judgment

of Non Pros , ’

” on October 1, 2014. The trial court denied the Petition o n
October 23, 2014, and on October 31, 2014, Appellants filed a notice of
appeal.
The underlying appealable order was entered on September 3, 2014.
Because no timely appeal was taken from that order, we conclude that this
Court lacks jurisdiction to cons ider this appeal. See Reading Anthracite

Co. v. Rich , 577 A.2d 881 (Pa. 1990) (timeliness of appeal is jurisdictional
and may be raised by the court sua sponte ).
Appeal quashed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 5/18/2015
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

November 8, 2016

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree

Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-16-0122 – STATUS OF 

YUCCA MOUNTAIN REPOSITORY PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

The Commission has approved the staff's recommendation to use a portion of the remaining 

$1.27 million in previously appropriated Nuclear Waste Fund funds to update the collection of

knowledge management reports to capture new insights since the previous reports were

completed.

cc: Chairman Burns 

Commissioner Svinicki 

Commissioner Baran

OGC

CFO

OCA

OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR
Subpart 3402.1—Definitions    **Parent topic:** PART 3402—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS3402.101 Definitions.       As used in this chapter—          *Chief of the Contracting Office* or *COCO* means an official serving in the contracting activity (Contracts and Acquisition Management (CAM) or FSA Acquisitions) as the manager of a group that awards and administers contracts for a principal office of the Department. See also definition of *Head of the Contracting Activity* or *HCA* in this section.          *Department* or *ED* means the United States Department of Education.          *Head of the Contracting Activity* or *HCA* means those officials within the Department who have responsibility for and manage an acquisition organization and usually hold unlimited procurement authority. The Executive Director, Federal Student Aid Acquisitions, is the HCA for FSA. The Director, Contracts and Acquisitions Management (CAM), is the HCA for all other Departmental program offices and all boards, commissions, and councils under the management control of the Department.          *Performance-Based Organization* or *PBO* is the office within the Department that is mandated by Public Law 105–244 to carry out Federal student assistance or aid programs and report to Congress on an annual basis. It may also be referred to as “Federal Student Aid.”          *Requiring activity* means the principal office charged with meeting or supporting a mission and delivering requirements. The requiring activity is responsible for obtaining funding or developing the program objectives. The requiring activity may also be the organizational unit that submits a written requirement or statement of need for services required by a contract.          *Senior Procurement Executive* or *SPE* means the single agency official appointed as such by the head of the agency and delegated broad responsibility for acquisition functions, including issuing agency acquisition policy and reporting on acquisitions agency-wide. The SPE also acts as the official one level above the contracting officer when the HCA is acting as a contracting officer.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-18827; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-53]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Hannibal, MO.

# DATES:

*Effective*                         0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 8, 2004 (69 FR 60286). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on November 16, 2004.

Anthony D. Roetzel,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-26524  Filed 12-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M