Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information a fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where th supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used i
if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You mus t

runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is inte n

one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of thi yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

‐ down lis t cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information wo r resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID ] (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the B o
2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family re q spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input inf
results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury req u Hg +2

, or if the Ontario

‐ Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

, HgP, and H Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information a fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where th supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used i
if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You mus t

runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is inte n

one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of thi yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

‐ down lis t cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information wo r resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID ] (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the B o
2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family re q spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input inf
results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury req u Hg +2

, or if the Ontario

‐ Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

, HgP, and H
Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

‐ Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to u Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have r follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample.

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supportin g

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

‐ downs in

You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types en t then enter an input rate of zero.
2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided.

3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate.
4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Su p

Emission Data1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units o If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (P ppmvd @ 7% O 2 (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are re q
2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given i n Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U. S

3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Su p
4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you

enter these data.a bout emission data from fossil
h e test methods are not currently

i f the method is not in the ERT or

t complete at least 3 separate

n ded to be used for one boiler of

i s spreadsheet. Fields shaded in

t s. You do not need to populate

r ksheet. Please name each ] _EmisTestMethods.xls

o iler Information worksheet.

q uired for this analysis. On each
f ormation, and emission test

on the constituent or constituent

uires that you enter both Hg 0 and

g +2

. However, both the Speciated a bout emission data from fossil
h e test methods are not currently

i f the method is not in the ERT or

t complete at least 3 separate

n ded to be used for one boiler of

i s spreadsheet. Fields shaded in

t s. You do not need to populate

r ksheet. Please name each ] _EmisTestMethods.xls

o iler Information worksheet.

q uired for this analysis. On each
f ormation, and emission test

on the constituent or constituent

uires that you enter both Hg 0 and

g +2

. However, both the Speciated

se a drop

‐ down provided in the
results for. General instructions

g Information field.

n the Fuel Type Selection field.

tered in one or more samples,

p porting Information field.o f measure, while others do not.

P ounds per million BTU) and

q uired to provide both.

n the Test Method Used field.

S

. EPA Method 0010).

p porting Information field.

u are entering data for please alsoEIA Facility Cod e Facility Name Boiler ID
864 Meredosia 05Control Device Configuraton Listed (by boiler) in Question 16 (page 17) of the questionnair eEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

5 4/1/2010 8:28
6 4/1/2010 11:08
7 4/1/2010 13:22 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in C

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

4/1/2010 10:28 2.336 Dry 4/1/2010 13:08 2.273 Dry 4/1/2010 15:22 2.079 Dry Test End Time Test End Date Total V aC olumn "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Test Method
Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Trap A and B Secti o 1.91E-06 1,519 U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Trap B Section 2 M a 1.82E-06 1,517 U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL Trap A and B Secti o 1.66E-06 1,539 a por Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

2,165 11.65 13.87 5.47 532596 342.806 247998 2,132 11.65 13.87 5.47 532596 342.806 244235 2,140 11.65 13.87 5.47 532596 342.806 245176 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Flue Gas
Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas
O 2 (%) Flue Gas
Flow Rate

(dscfm)Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method

subbituminous lb/hour Other
subbituminous lb/hour Other
subbituminous lb/hour Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA/QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike ( n g) Total NonSpike (ng)

From Process Data 66065 127.36 1.00 128.36 0 128.36
From Process Data 66041 245.49 1.46 246.95 120 126.95
From Process Data 66237 122.08 1.00 123.08 0 123.08

Other Supporting InformationSample
Volume ( dscm ) Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff.
Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough
Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.056583 1.55 0.79 2.27 66073
0.055436 0.51 0.59 2.29 66232
0.054964 1.36 0.82 2.24 66064 ≤ 20% of field recovery test ≤ 10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg

conc. >1

μ g/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total
Mass Initial Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng) Sample
Volume ( dscm ) Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff.
Limit

254.73 1.00 255.73 120 135.73 0.05647 1.34
124.06 1.00 125.06 0 125.06 0.05546 0.48
225.03 1.00 226.03 120 106.03 0.05526 0.83 ≤ 20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough
Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

0.39 2.40 0.14 2.89 2.26
0.81 2.26 0.03 0.77 2.20
0.44 1.92 0.32 7.71 1.85 ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1

μ g/dscm: or

≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2

μ g/dscm abs.diff.
for H g conc. ≤ 1 ≤ 10% of Section

1 Hg mass for

Hg conc. >1

μ g/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1

for H g conc. ≤ 1 M Paired Trap Agreement (RD)R (%) by
Run R avg (%) Limit

106.4
102.4

84.4 Average Recovery,
between 85 and
115% M easured Spike Recovery ( R )

97.7EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Hg 0 Value (μg /dscm ) Measured Hg +2 Value (μg /dscm ) Test End Time Test End DateMeasured Hg P Value (μg /dscm ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest Method
Comments Total Mercury (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Flue Gas

O 2 (%) Flue Gas
Flow Rate

(dscfm) Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Test End Date Test End Time (pp )Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) CO Emission Test Results

( y) g( , , )Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission RateSteam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Flue Gas O 2 (%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas CO 2 (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fue

p ypUnits of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate l #1

pFuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2

ypFuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3

p ypMeasurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fue

p ypUnits of Measure Measurement Method l #4 Other Supporting
InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Test End Date Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (pp m ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Formaldehyde Emission Test Test End TimeData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL ) Test Method
Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Results Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input
Rate Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas
O 2 (%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Date Test End Time MethanTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method
Comments lb/mmBtu e Emission Test Results Calculated Emis sppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas
O 2 (%) Flue Gas
Flow Rate

(dscfm) s ion Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas
Moisture (%) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Flue Gas Temperat

ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Measurement
Method Other Supporting
InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Test End Date Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (pp m ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time SO 2 Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL ) Test Method
Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Flue Gas

O 2 (%) Flue Gas
Flow Rate

( dscfm ) Total Heat Input ( mmBtu/hr ) Flue Gas
Moisture ( % ) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) F uUnits of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type u el #1 Fuel #2 F uUnits of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #4 u el #3Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as d d) Run Number Test Start Date

Methyl chloride 1 5/1/2010 Methyl chloride 2 5/1/2010 Methyl chloride 3 5/2/2010 Acetaldehyde 1 5/3/2010 Acetaldehyde 2 5/3/2010 Acetaldehyde 3 5/4/2010 needed )Measured Value (μg /m3 ) Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time Measured Value (μg/m3)

10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM

2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM
10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PM
10:00 AM 5/1/2010 12:00 PM

2:00 PM 5/1/2010 5:00 PM
10:00 AM 5/2/2010 12:00 PMFootnotes: * Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge ** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Basis Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Front Half Mass ( n g) Basis Test Method Used DDL ) Front Half Mass (ng)Back Half Mass ( n g) Total Mass ( n g) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu Calculated E m

Back Half Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtupp mdv @ 7% O 2 Steam Output (1000
lb/hr ) Total Heat Input ( mmBtu/hr ) Flue Gas Moisture (%) m ission Rate

ppmdv @ 7% O 2 lb/hr) (mmBtu/hr)Flue Gas O 2 (%) Flue Gas Flow Rate ( scfm ) Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Flue Gas CO 2 (%) (scfm) (F)Fuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #1

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement MethodFuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement MethodFuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #3

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement MethodFuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #4

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement MethodOther Supporting
InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name

864 Meredosia

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as d d) Run Number

Anthracene 1
Anthracene 2
Anthracene 3 Pyrene 1 Pyrene 2 Pyrene 3 needed )Boiler ID

05

Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

5/1/2010 10:00 AM 5/1/2010
5/1/2010 2:00 PM 5/1/2010
5/2/2010 10:00 AM 5/2/2010
5/3/2010 10:00 AM 5/1/2010
5/3/2010 2:00 PM 5/1/2010
5/4/2010 10:00 AM 5/2/2010Footnotes: * Front Half Composite cont a ** Back Half Composite cont a *** Condensate Composite co n

Measured Value (μg /m3 ) Basis ( Wet or Dr y) Test End Time Measured Value (μg/m3) Basis (Wet or Dry)

12:00 PM

5:00 PM
12:00 PM
12:00 PM

5:00 PM
12:00 PMa ins particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses

a ins XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses

n tains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Test Method Used Data Fla g ( ADL
, BDL
, DDL ) Front Half mass* ( n g) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission T e

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL

, BDL
, DDL) Front Half mass (ng)Back Half mass* ( n g) Condensate Mass*** ( n g) Total Com p osite ( n g) e st Results

Back Half mass (ng) Condensate Mass (ng) Total Composite (ng)Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu pp mdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate

Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Flue Gas O 2 (%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas CO 2 (%)Fuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fue

Fuel Input Rate Fuel TypeUnits of Measure Measurement Method Fuel In p ut Rate l #1

Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input RateFuel T yp e Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2

Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement MethodFuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Units of Measure Fuel #3

Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of MeasureMeasurement Method Fuel In p ut Rate Fuel T yp e Fue

Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel TypeUnits of Measure Measurement Method l #4 Other Supporting
Information Units of Measure Measurement Method InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (pp m ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test End Time Hy dTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL ) Test Method
Comments d rogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Calculated
Emission Rate

( lb/mmBtu )Flue Gas
Flow Rate

( dscfm ) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input ( mmBtu/hr ) Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Flue Gas
Moisture ( % ) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas
O 2 (%)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (pp m ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Resul t Test End TimeData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL ) Test Method
Comments Calculated
Emission Rate

( lb/mmBtu ) Flue Gas
Moisture ( % ) t s Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input ( mmBtu/hr )Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Fuel #1 Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas
O 2 (%) Flue Gas
Flow Rate

( dscfm )Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (pp m ) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Result sData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL ) Test Method
Comments s Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input ( mmBtu/hr ) Calculated
Emission Rate

( lb/mmBtu ) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Flue Gas
Flow Rate

( dscfm ) Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Fuel #1 Flue Gas
CO 2 (%) Flue Gas
O 2 (%)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured NO (ppm) Test End Date Test End TimeMeasured NO 2 (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used NO X Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu) Total NO X Calc uppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas
O 2 (%) u lated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas
CO 2 (%)Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Flue Gas
Flow Rate

( dscfm ) Flue Gas Temperature ( F ) Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

864 Meredosia 05

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Test End Time Test End DateTotal Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter) Test Method Used Constisuent Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments Flue Gas
Flow Rate

(dscfm) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Flue Gas Temperat

ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Measurement
Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Measurement
Method Fuel Input
Rate Fuel Type Units of
Measure Fuel #3 Fuel #4Measurement
Method Other Supporting Information