alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14042. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14042 was editorially reclassified as section 12431 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study of State Laws Regarding Insurance Discrimination Against Victims of Violence Against Women

Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1206, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1507, directed the Attorney General to conduct a national study to identify State laws that address insurance discrimination against victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to submit to Congress a report and recommendations based on that study not later than 1 year after Oct. 28, 2000.

#### Study of Workplace Effects From Violence Against Women

Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1207, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1507, directed the Attorney General to conduct a national survey of programs to assist employers and employees on appropriate responses in the workplace to victims of domestic violence, stalking, or sexual assault, and not later than 18 months after Oct. 28, 2000, to submit to Congress a report and recommendations based on that survey.

#### Study of Unemployment Compensation for Victims of Violence Against Women

Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1208, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1508, directed the Secretary of Labor, in consultation with the Attorney General, to conduct a national study to identify the impact of State unemployment compensation laws on victims of domestic violence when the victim's separation from employment is a direct result of the domestic violence and to submit to Congress a report and recommendations based on that study not later than 1 year after Oct. 28, 2000.
#### § 301.13 Fur products having furs with different countries of origin.

When a fur product is composed of furs with different countries of origin the names of such countries shall be set forth in the required information in the order of predominance by surface areas of the furs in the fur product.
No. 16-009 February 25, 2016

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Meeting March 11 in Rockville, Md., to Discuss

Improving Tracking and Reporting on Rulemaking Efforts

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public and industry representatives 

March 11 to discuss how the agency might improve public information on new or revised regulations. 

The staff will discuss efforts to develop recommendations for the Commission’s consideration.

The meeting will run from 1-5 p.m. on March 11 in room T2B3 of the NRC’s White Flint 

complex at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Md. NRC staff will describe its work in four areas of 

interest:

 Creating a single tool for the public to track rulemaking activities;

 Developing consistent rulemaking terms and definitions;

 Ensuring that the public has access to current rulemaking activity information;

 Revising the NRC website to reflect the items above. 

The public will have multiple opportunities to ask questions and provide comments on the 

staff’s work and preliminary conclusions.

The meeting will include a teleconference and webinar. For the call-in number, webinar details,

or more information on the issues to be discussed, please contact the NRC’s Tara Inverso at 301-415-

1024, or via e-mail at tara.inverso@nrc.gov.
**DJI Phantom Pre -**  **Flight Inspection Check List**

**Pre -**  **Flight Check List**  Visual inspection for defects  Batteries fully charged and checked
- Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone, approved/compatible device  Props tightened and locked  SD card in camera  Lens cap removed (As necessary)  Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode  UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert from travel mode to flight mode or use the app  DJI FC40 app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad  Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)  Minimum return height adjusted (check for tallest object and set accordingly)  UAS placed in safe launch and recover position  Home point reprogrammed via app  Area clear of people / ob structions
**Flight Check List**  Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / Listen for defects  Confirm expected stick operation  Monitor battery power  Monitor signal strength  Keep line
- of
- sight with UAS

o Ensure area/zone o f intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic.

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of any electrical/power lines

o Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS

o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in th e event an emergency landing is required
### §1411d. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §204, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 668

Section, act Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §815, 68 Stat. 647, required submission of specifications by applicants prior to award of any contract for construction of a project and submission of data with respect to acquisition of land prior to authorization to purchase such land.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1551-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida (FEMA-1551-DR), dated September 16, 2004, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 17, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective November 17, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-26704 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.735-7 Negotiation for employment.

Members and employees shall comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 208 (Acts affecting a personal interest) and 5 CFR part 2635, subpart F (Seeking other employment). *See* § 200.735-4(f)(2) of this subpart.

[75 FR 42277, July 20, 2010]
### §1320c–13. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–432, title I, §156(a)(1), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4440

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1164, as added Apr. 7, 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, title IX, §9401(b), 100 Stat. 196; amended Oct. 22, 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1895(b)(17), 100 Stat. 2934; Dec. 19, 1989, Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, §6003(g)(3)(D)(v), 103 Stat. 2153, related to 100 percent peer review for certain surgical procedures.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to services provided on or after Oct. 31, 1994, see section 156(a)(3) of Pub. L. 103–432, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1320c–3 of this title.
### §16988. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16988 was editorially reclassified as section 20988 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 768.5 Contents of foreign availability submissions and Technical Advisory Committee certifications. ( a ) All foreign availability submissions must contain, in addition to information on product or technology alleged to be available from foreign sources, at least: ( 1 ) The name of the claimant;
( 2 ) The claimant's mailing and business address;
( 3 ) The claimant's telephone number; and
( 4 ) A contact point and telephone number.
( b ) Foreign availability submissions and TAC certifications should contain as much evidence as is available to support the claim, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Product names and model designations of the items alleged to be comparable;
( 2 ) Extent to which the alleged comparable item is based on U.S. technology;
( 3 ) Names and locations of the non-U.S. sources and the basis for claiming that the item is a non-U.S. source item;
( 4 ) Key performance elements, attributes, and characteristics of the items on which a qualitative comparison may be made;
( 5 ) Non-U.S. source's production quantities and/or sales of the alleged comparable items and marketing efforts;
( 6 ) Estimated market demand and the economic impact of the control;
( 7 ) Product names, model designations, and value of U.S. controlled parts and components incorporated in the items alleged to be comparable; and
( 8 ) The basis for the claim that the item is available-in-fact to the country or countries for which foreign availability is alleged.
( c ) Supporting evidence of foreign availability may include, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Foreign manufacturers' catalogs, brochures, operation or maintenance manuals;
( 2 ) Articles from reputable trade and technical publications;
( 3 ) Photographs;
( 4 ) Depositions based on eyewitness accounts; and
( 5 ) Other credible evidence. Note to paragraph ( c
) of this section:
See supplement no. 1 to part 768 for additional examples of supporting evidence.
( d ) Upon receipt of a FAS or TAC certification, BIS will review it to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the belief that foreign availability may exist. If BIS determines the FAS or TAC certification is lacking in supporting evidence, BIS will seek additional evidence from appropriate sources, including the claimant or TAC. BIS will initiate the assessment when it determines that it has sufficient evidence that foreign availability may exist. Claimant and TAC certified assessments will be deemed to be initiated as of the date of such determination.
( e ) Claimants and TACs are advised to review the foreign availability assessment criteria described in § 768.6 of this part and the examples of evidence described in supplement no. 1 to part 768 when assembling supporting evidence for inclusion in the FAS or TAC certification.
§ 201.451 Oral argument before the Commission. ( a ) *Availability.* The Commission, on its own motion or the motion of a party or any other aggrieved person entitled to Commission review, may order oral argument with respect to any matter. Motions for oral argument with respect to whether to affirm all or part of an initial decision by a hearing officer shall be granted unless exceptional circumstances make oral argument impractical or inadvisable. The Commission will consider appeals, motions and other matters properly before it on the basis of the papers filed by the parties without oral argument unless the Commission determines that the presentation of facts and legal arguments in the briefs and record and the decisional process would be significantly aided by oral argument.
( b ) *Procedure.* Requests for oral argument shall be made by separate motion accompanying the initial brief on the merits. The Commission shall issue an order as to whether oral argument is to be heard, and if so, the time and place therefor. If oral argument is granted, the time fixed for oral argument shall be changed only by written order of the Commission, for good cause shown. The order shall state at whose request the change is made and the reasons for any such changes. No visual aids may be used at oral argument unless copies have been provided to the Commission and all parties at least five business days before the argument is to be held.
( c ) *Time allowed.* Unless the Commission orders otherwise, not more than one half-hour per side will be allowed for oral argument. The Commission may, in its discretion, determine that several persons have a common interest, and that the interests represented will be considered a single side for purposes of allotting time for oral argument. Time will be divided equally among persons on a single side, provided, however, that by mutual agreement they may reallocate their time among themselves. A request for additional time must be made by motion filed reasonably in advance of the date fixed for argument.
( d ) *Participation of Commissioners.* A member of the Commission who was not present at the oral argument may participate in the decision of the proceeding, provided that the member has reviewed the transcript of such argument prior to such participation. The decision shall state whether the required review was made.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13180, Mar. 19, 2004]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Exploring Careers

              																								United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.						"Exploring Careers: Scientific and Technical Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2001-9" in *Exploring Careers*			(1979).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4731/item/499432, accessed on September 26, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00329- CR

Brandon Robish eaux, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 207 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR2012 -04 2, H ONO RAB LE R. B RUCE B OY ER, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R A N D ME M O R A N D UM O P I N I O N
P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was orig inally due November 24, 2014. On counsel’s motions, the time for filing was extended to April 3, 2015. On May 8, the Court order ed appellan t ’s co u n sel, Susan Schoon, to file a brief on appellant’ s behalf no later than J une 5. Counsel did not file a brief as orde red. The appeal is abate d. The trial court shall conduct a hearin g to deter mine whether appellant desires to prosec ute this appea l and if so, whether counsel has abandone d the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)( 2). The court shall make appropr iate finding s and re co m m endations. I f
nece ssary , the court shall appoint substitut e counsel who will eff ectively repr esent appellant in this
cause . A rec ord from this hear ing, including copies of all finding s and order s and a transcription ofthe court repor ter’s notes, shall be forwa rded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental
rec ord no later

than J uly 17, 2015. It is ordere d on J une 17, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Abated a nd Remanded Filed: June 17, 2015 Do Not Publish

2
#### § 210.12-09 Valuation and qualifying accounts.

| Column A—Description1 | Column B—Balance at beginning of period | Column C—Additions | | Column D—Deductions—describe | Column E—Balance at end of period |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1)—Charged to costs and expenses | (2)—Charged to other accounts—describe |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 List, by major classes, all valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves not included in specific schedules. Identify each class of valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves by descriptive title. Group (a) those valuation and qualifying accounts which are deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply and (b) those reserves which support the balance sheet caption, Reserves. Valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves as to which the additions, deductions, and balances were not individually significant may be grouped in one total and in such case the information called for under columns C and D need not be given. | | | | | |

[[37 FR 14602](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/37-FR-14602), July 21, 1972. Redesignated and amended at [45 FR 63679](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/45-FR-63679), Sept. 25, 1980]
### §1365. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–442, §1, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 81

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XV, §1505, as added Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1212, §4(a), 68 Stat. 1133, related to status of a Federal employee who was performing Federal service at time of separation from employment by the United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective only with respect to benefit years which began more than thirty days after Apr. 22, 1960, see Pub. L. 86–442, §1, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 81.
MP5325_7003_3_3 DNAD Exception

When a program office concludes that domestically melted or produced specialty metal cannot be

procured (as described in DFARS 225.7003-3(b)(5)) to support the production of a particular end

item or component, the contracting officer must prepare a DNAD D&F for specialty metals. The

SecAF may approve a DNAD for an individual contract if a compliant specialty metal of satisfactory

quality and sufficient quantity, and in the required form, cannot be procured as and when needed at

a fair and reasonable price. This approval authority is not delegable. A Class DNAD requires the

approval of the USD(A&S).

Parent topic: MP5325.7003-3 - Exceptions
### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER AUTOMOBILE FUEL PURCHASE MEASURES
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SRM-SECY-16-0021:  Discountinuation of Rulemaking Acitivities

Accession Number: ML16141A042

Date Released: Friday, May 20, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16141A044 - SRM-SECY-16-0021:  Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activities (1 page(s), 5/19/2016)
    - ML16141A045 - SRM-SECY-16-0021:  Rulemaking / Federal Register / Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activities (Encl. 1) (22 page(s), 5/20/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.



|                                        |  |                               |  |                                             |     |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | --- | -
|Company                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation |  | Percentage OwnershipAs of December 31, 2014 |    
|SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited           |  | British Virgin Islands        |  |                                             | 100 | %
|Siliconware U.S.A. Inc.                 |  | United States of America      |  |                                             | 100 | %
|SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited           |  | Cayman Islands                |  |                                             | 100 | %
|Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited |  | Peoples Republic of China    |  |                                             | 100 | %
#### § 1209.40 Certification responsibility, multiple parties.

If there is more than one party (i.e., manufacturer, private labeler, or importer) otherwise subject to the requirements of this subpart B of part 1209 for certain cellulose insulation, only the party closest to the consumer in the distribution chain is required to issue a certificate.
#### Aetna Casualty *&*Surety Co., Respondent, v. Lincoln Farm Products Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Robbins Sport Surfaces, a family-owned business, is a supplier of high-performance maple and 

synthetic sports flooring systems to the National Basketball Association, Women’s National 

Basketball Association, National Collegiate Athletic Association, sports arenas, education and 

fitness markets. To access new markets abroad, Robbins has relied on EXIM’s export credit 

insurance for over ten years. EXIM has insured $3.8 million of Robbins’ shipments since FY 

2007. The company’s export sales have jumped from 5 to 15 percent of total annual revenue.
#### § 301.30 [Reserved]
5346.311 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement.       Agencies shall establish procedures for determining when higher-level contract quality requirements are necessary, for determining the risk (both the likelihood and the impact) of nonconformance, and for advising the contracting officer about which higher-level standards should be applied and included in the solicitation and contract. Requiring compliance with higher-level quality standards is necessary in solicitations and contracts for complex or critical items (see FAR 46.203) or when the technical requirements of the contract require -         (1) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process controls, testing and inspection; or         (2) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control, and advanced metrology,         (a) The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard(s) listed below.         ___________________________[Contracting Officer shall insert the title, number (if any), date, and tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards.]         (b) The Contractor shall include applicable requirements of the higher-level quality standard(s) listed in paragraph (a) of this clause and the requirement to flow down such standards, as applicable, to lower-tier subcontracts, in-          (1) Any subcontract for critical and complex items (see FAR 46.203(b) and (c)); or         (2) When the technical requirements of a subcontract require-         (i) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process control, testing, and inspection; or         (ii) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control, and advanced metrology.         (c) See FAR 46.311     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5346.3 – [RESERVED]
### §15512. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15512 was editorially reclassified as section 21112 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.