alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14407. Application to District of Columbia

For purposes of this chapter, the term "funds appropriated by Congress" includes funds appropriated to the District of Columbia pursuant to an authorization of appropriations under title V of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act and the term "Federal government" includes the government of the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–12, §8, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 26; Pub. L. 105–33, title XI, §11717(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 105–12, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 23, known as the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14401 of this title and Tables.

The District of Columbia Home Rule Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–198, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 774. Title V of the Act was classified to the District of Columbia Code prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–33, title XI, §11601, Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 777.

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–33 substituted "District of Columbia Home Rule Act" for "District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–33 effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise provided in title XI of Pub. L. 105–33, see section 11721 of Pub. L. 105–33, set out as a note under section 4246 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
### §1320c–8. Authorization for use of certain funds to administer provisions of this part

Expenses incurred in the administration of the contracts described in section 1395y(g) of this title shall be payable from—

(1) funds in the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund; and

(2) funds in the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund,

in such amounts from each of such Trust Funds as the Secretary shall deem to be fair and equitable after taking into consideration the expenses attributable to the administration of this part with respect to each of such programs. The Secretary shall make such transfers of moneys between such Trust Funds as may be appropriate to settle accounts between them in cases where expenses properly payable from one such Trust Fund have been paid from the other such Trust Fund.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1159, as added Pub. L. 97–248, title I, §143, Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 390.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1320c–8, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1159, as added Oct. 30, 1972, Pub. L. 92–603, title II, §249F(b), 86 Stat. 1437; amended Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, §2113(f), 95 Stat. 795, related to reconsideration hearing and review, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 97–248.
132 STAT. 5038 PUBLIC LAW 115–340—DEC. 21, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1210: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–340 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 122 W. 

Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PLEASANTON VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans Post Office’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 1210] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2414

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United

States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa

Shawn Allen Hungate, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 9, 1997

 Filed: December 24, 1997 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Shawn Allen Hungate appeals from a final

judgment entered in the United States District Court for 1

the Northern District of Iowa sentencing him to 94 months

imprisonment, three years supervised release, and special

assessments totaling
-2-

$150, upon a guilty plea to one count of unlawful

possession of firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(8) and 924(a)(2), and two counts of mailing

threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 876. Defendant has a history of physically abusing his

ex-wife and child, including assaults on his ex-wife

during her pregnancy. In February of 1995, a state court

magistrate judge ordered defendant to refrain from any

contact with his ex-wife and child, including contact by

mail or telephone. Defendant was also then prohibited

from possessing or receiving a firearm. Thereafter,

defendant, on one occasion, unlawfully purchased and

possessed a firearm which he then used to shoot himself

in the shoulder prior to entering his ex-wife’s place of

work and, on two separate occasions, wrote one letter

addressed to his 14-month-old daughter threatening to

harm or kill her upon being released from jail, and wrote

another letter to his ex-wife’s sister, threatening to

harm or kill his ex-wife and his daughter, among others.

For reversal, defendant argues that the district

court erred in: (1) applying the specific offense

characteristic in U.S.S.G. § 2A6.1(b) because his § 876

offenses involved conduct evidencing an intent to carry

out his threats; (2) failing to group his offenses

together for purposes of the multi-count rules in

U.S.S.G. § 3D1.1; and (3) departing upward by 21 months

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 on the ground that the
-3-

guidelines fail to adequately take into consideration the

danger he poses to his ex-wife and child. 

Jurisdiction in the district court was proper based

upon 18 U.S.C. § 3231. Jurisdiction in this court is

proper based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
-4-

Upon careful review of the briefs on appeal and the

record in this case, including the sentencing transcript,

we hold that the relevant factual findings of the

district court are not clearly erroneous, that no errors

of law have occurred, and that further discussion is

unnecessary. Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH

CIRCUIT.
#### § 210.12-01 Application of §§ 210.12-01 to 210.12-29.

These sections prescribe the form and content of the schedules required by §§ 210.5-04, 210.6-10, 210.6A-05, and 210.7-05.

[59 FR 65637, Dec. 20, 1994]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|November 4, 2005                                                                               |  | 

---



QuickLinks
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1342 !LIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. FALLON LUMINOUS PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

in case no. 2:06-CV-25, Judge William J. Haynes, Jr.

ON MOTION Before NEWMAN,

### Circuit Judge. ORDER Fallon Luminous Products Corporation moves for a stay, pending appeal, of the permanent injunction and damage award entered on April 30, 2009 by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: iLight Technologies, Inc. is directed to respond to the motion within seven calendar days of the date of this order. FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# witmelltwoR

MAY 12 2009 JAN HORIMIS CLERK Date 

### /s/ Jan Horbaly 

### MAY 12 2009cc: C. Mark Kittredge, Esq.

Alexandra T. MacKay, Esq. s17

2009-1342 2
### §17192. Hydrothermal research and development

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application for geothermal energy production from hydrothermal systems.

#### (b) Programs

The program authorized in subsection (a) shall include the following:

#### (1) Advanced hydrothermal resource tools

The research and development of advanced geologic tools to assist in locating hydrothermal resources, and to increase the reliability of site characterization, including the development of new imaging and sensing technologies and techniques to assist in prioritization of targets for characterization;

#### (2) Exploratory drilling for geothermal resources

The demonstration of advanced technologies and techniques of siting and exploratory drilling for undiscovered resources in a variety of geologic settings, carried out in collaboration with industry partners that will assist in the acquisition of high quality data sets relevant for hydrothermal subsurface characterization activities.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §613, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1679; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3002(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2487.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to hydrothermal research and development.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
### §3104. Small business concerns

It is the policy of Congress that a fair proportion of the total purchases and contracts for property and services for the Federal Government shall be placed with small business concerns.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3744.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3104 | 41:252(b). | June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, §302(b), 63 Stat. 393; July 12, 1952, ch. 703, §1(m), 66 Stat. 594; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2714(a)(1)(A), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1184. |

Section

The word "declared" is omitted as unnecessary.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3906 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3906

     To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow 
  recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island 
                          Sound transit zone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2012

    Mr. Bishop of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow 
  recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island 
                          Sound transit zone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING FOR ATLANTIC STRIPED BASS IN THE BLOCK 
              ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE.

    Section 9 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
5158) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Recreational Fishing in Block Island Sound Transit Zone.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall not prohibit fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass 
        in the Block Island Sound transit zone.
            ``(2) Exception.--This subsection does not limit the 
        authority of the Secretary to establish seasonal or other 
        temporary limitations on fishing that are specifically 
        necessary for the conservation and management of Atlantic 
        striped bass.
            ``(3) Block island sound transit zone defined.--In this 
        subsection the term `Block Island Sound transit zone' means the 
        area of the exclusive economic zone within Block Island Sound, 
        north of a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk Point, New 
        York, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, Rhode 
        Island; and west of a line connecting Point Judith Light, Point 
        Judith, Rhode Island, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block 
        Island, Rhode Island.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3965 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 426. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 426. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID RED 426. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acid Red 426, (2- 

Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 5- 

[2-[4-(acetylamino)-2- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]diazenyl]-6-amino-4- 

hydroxy-,sodium salt (1:1)) 

(CAS No. 75198–93–5) (provided for in subheading 

3204.12.45) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3965 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Erin Carney, Respondent, v Oakfield-Alabama Central School District et al., Appellants.

[820 NYS2d 914]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered November 23, 2005. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

*1208Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the *attorneys for*the parties on August 23, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
#### §§ 23.107-23.149 [Reserved]
IB 

Union Calendar No. 352 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4005 

[Report No. 112–499] 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a study and report 

to Congress on gaps in port security in the United States and a plan 

to address them. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Ms. HAHN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

MAY 30, 2012 

Additional sponsors: Mr. RANGEL, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, Mr. POE of Texas, and Mr. BROUN of Georgia 

MAY 30, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4005 RH

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct 

a study and report to Congress on gaps in port security 

in the United States and a plan to address them. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4005 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gauging American Port 

5 Security Act’’ or the ‘‘GAPS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY, REPORT, AND PLAN TO ADDRESS GAPS IN 

7 PORT SECURITY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

9 of enactment of this Act the Secretary of Homeland Security 

10 shall— 

11 (1) conduct a study of, and submit to the Con12 gress a report on, remaining gaps in port security in 

13 the United States; and 

14 (2) include in such report a prioritization of 

15 such gaps and a plan for addressing them. 

16 (b) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) 

17 shall be submitted in classified form but shall contain an 

18 unclassified annex. 

19 SEC. 3. INFORMATION SHARING. 

20 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in accord21 ance with rules for the handling of classified information, 

22 share, as appropriate, with designated points of contact 

23 from Federal agencies and State, local, or tribal govern24 ments, and port system owners and operators, relevant in25 formation regarding remaining gaps in port security of the 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4005 RH

1 United States, prioritization of such gaps, and a plan for 

2 addressing such gaps. In the event that a designated point 

3 of contact does not have the necessary security clearance to 

4 receive such information, the Secretary shall help expedite 

5 the clearance process, as appropriate. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 352 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4005 

[Report No. 112–499] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to 

to address them. in port security in the United States and a plan conduct a study and report to Congress on gaps 

MAY 30, 2012 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §1395w–114d. Selected drug subsidy program

With respect to covered part D drugs that would be applicable drugs (as defined in section 1395w–114c(g)(2) of this title) but for the application of subparagraph (B) of such section, the Secretary shall provide a process whereby, in the case of an applicable beneficiary (as defined in section 1395w–114c(g)(1) of this title) who, with respect to a year, is enrolled in a prescription drug plan or is enrolled in an MA–PD plan, has not incurred costs that are equal to or exceed the annual out-of-pocket threshold specified in section 1395w–102(b)(4)(B)(i) of this title, and is dispensed such a drug, the Secretary (periodically and on a timely basis) provides the PDP sponsor or the MA organization offering the plan, a subsidy with respect to such drug that is equal to 10 percent of the negotiated price (as defined in section 1395w–114c(g)(6) of this title) of such drug.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1860D–14D, as added Pub. L. 117–169, title I, §11201(c)(1), Aug. 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1888.)
#### Alice L. Longman, Appellant, v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association of America, Respondent.

In an action to recover upon an accident insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03601]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Friday, February 27, 2015.

PLACE:  Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, 
9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations 
matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2015-03601 Filed 2-18-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Akeem Adeyemi, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 798]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J), rendered July 25, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CEL 460.50 (5).

*756The People sufficiently complied with CPL 240.45 (1) (b) by turning over to defendant a list of a witness’s convictions including the Penal Law sections violated and the dates of conviction *(see People v Graham,*289 AD2d 417 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 754 [2002]; *People v Moore,*244 AD2d 776 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 975 [1998]). The witness was thoroughly impeached by means of these convictions and defendant was not prejudiced by the absence of docket numbers *(see People v Osborne,*91 NY2d 827 [1997]; *People v Arac,*297 AD2d 560 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 580 [2003]; *People v Bazemore,*272 AD2d 64 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 888 [2000]). The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request to recall the witness for further cross-examination about the underlying facts of one of his prior convictions based on newly obtained information, since there had already been a sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the witness on this subject *(see People v Stevenson,*281 AD2d 323 [2001]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.