alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1962b–2. Organization of commissions

#### (a) Commencement of functions; transfer of property, assets, and records upon termination of commission; availability of studies, data, and other materials to participants

Each river basin commission shall organize for the performance of its functions within ninety days after the President shall have declared the establishment of such commission, subject to the availability of funds for carrying on its work. A commission shall terminate upon decision of the Council or agreement of a majority of the States composing the commission. Upon such termination, all property, assets, and records of the commission shall thereafter be turned over to such agencies of the United States and the participating States as shall be appropriate in the circumstances: Provided, That studies, data, and other materials useful in water and related land resources planning to any of the participants shall be kept freely available to all such participants.

#### (b) Vice chairman; State election; State representation

State members of each commission shall elect a vice chairman, who shall serve also as chairman and coordinating officer of the State members of the commission and who shall represent the State governments in Federal-State relations on the commission.

#### (c) Vacancies; alternates for chairman and vice chairman

Vacancies in a commission shall not affect its powers but shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointments were made: Provided, That the chairman and vice chairman may designate alternates to act for them during temporary absences.

#### (d) Consensus of members on issues; opportunities for individual views; record of position of chairman and vice chairman; final authority on procedural questions

In the work of the commission every reasonable endeavor shall be made to arrive at a consensus of all members on all issues; but failing this, full opportunity shall be afforded each member for the presentation and report of individual views: Provided, That at any time the commission fails to act by reason of absence of consensus, the position of the chairman, acting in behalf of the Federal members, and the vice chairman, acting upon instructions of the State members, shall be set forth in the record: Provided further, That the chairman, in consultation with the vice chairman, shall have the final authority, in the absence of an applicable by-law adopted by the commission or in the absence of a consensus, to fix the times and places for meetings, to set deadlines for the submission of annual and other reports, to establish subcommittees, and to decide such other procedural questions as may be necessary for the commission to perform its functions.

(Pub. L. 89–80, title II, §203, July 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 248.)
#### § 10.94 Setting aside of default.

In order to prevent injustice and on such conditions as may be appropriate, (a) the Commission may at any time set aside a default order obtained under § 10.93; and (b) the Administrative Law Judge may set aside a default order obtained under § 10.93 at any time prior to filing of his initial decision in a proceeding in which there are remaining respondents. Any motion to set aside a default shall be made within a reasonable time, and shall state the reasons for the failure to file or appear and specify the nature of the proposed defense in the proceeding.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15Ca1-1 Notice of government securities broker-dealer activities. ( a ) Every government securities broker or government securities dealer that is a broker or dealer registered pursuant to section 15 or 15B of the Act (other than a financial institution as defined in section 3(a)(46) of the Act) shall file with the Commission written notice on Form BD (§ 249.501 of this chapter) in accordance with the instructions contained therein that it is a government securities broker or government securities dealer. After July 25, 1987, every broker or dealer subject to this paragraph shall file notice that it is a government securities broker or government securities dealer prior to or on the date it begins acting as a government securities broker or government securities dealer.
( b ) Every government securities broker or government securities dealer required to file notice under paragraph (a) of this section shall file with the Commission written notice on Form BD in accordance with the instructions contained therein when it ceases to be a government securities broker or government securities dealer. Notice shall be filed within 30 days after the date the broker or dealer has ceased acting as a government securities broker or a government securities dealer.
( c ) Any notice required pursuant to this section shall be considered filed with the Commission if it is filed with the Central Registration Depository (operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.) in accordance with applicable filing requirements.
[52 FR 16839, May 6, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 14, Jan. 4, 1993; 64 FR 25148, May 10, 1999; 73 FR 4693, Jan. 28, 2008]
§ 230.607 Sales material to be filed. Four copies of each of the following communications prepared or authorized by the issuer or anyone associated with the issuer, any of its affiliates or any principal underwriter for use in connection with the offering of any securities under §§ 230.601 to 230.610a shall be filed with the Commission at least five days (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) prior to any use thereof, or such shorter period as the Commission, in its discretion, may authorize: ( a ) Every advertisement, article or other communication proposed to be published in any newspaper, magazine or other periodical;
( b ) The script of every radio or television broadcast; and
( c ) Every letter, circular or other written communication proposed to be sent, given or otherwise communicated to more than ten persons.
#### § 230.120 Inspection of registration statements.

Except for material contracts or portions thereof accorded confidential treatment pursuant to § 230.406, all registration statements are available for public inspection, during business hours, at the principal office of the Commission in Washington, D.C. Electronic registration statements made through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system are publicly available through the Commission's Web site (*http://www.sec.gov*).

[61 FR 24654, May 15, 1996]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. (“AISC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of AISC's standards development activities are: to develop standards addressing the design, fabrication and erection of structural steel, including specifications for structural steel buildings, specifications for nuclear facilities, seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, standards for the qualification of steel structures inspectors, code of standard practice for structural steel fabrication and erection, and standards for steel shipment notices and bar codes.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-27070  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 10.1(b)


             Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (demand) Issued by
             NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on January 11, 2006



    Issue Date        Due Date           Principal          Conversion Price
    ----------        --------           ---------          ----------------
     01/11/06        Earlier of:          $375,000      Greater of: (i) $0.0034;
                     (i) demand;                        or (ii) the par value of
                     or (ii) 07/11/06                   NCT Group, Inc.
                                                        common stock on the
                                                        date of conversion
### §17553. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17553 was editorially reclassified as section 60553 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Wlliam J. McKay, Deceased. Ruth G. McKay, Appellant; Franklin J. Lapeire et al., as Executors of William J. McKay, Deceased, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 744.]
#### William J. Edell, Appellant, v. Shirley M. Edell, Respondent.

Motion granted and appeals dismissed!1
Order entered September 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00475-CV

LLOYD DOUGLAS, Appellant

V.

CITY OF KEMP, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 89460-422

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 10, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file 

reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 29, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15Ba1-5 Amendments to Form MA and Form MA-I. ( a ) *When amendment is required—Form MA.* A registered municipal advisor shall promptly amend the information contained in its Form MA (17 CFR 249.1300): ( 1 ) At least annually, within 90 days of the end of a municipal advisor's fiscal year, or of the end of the calendar year for a sole proprietor; and
( 2 ) More frequently, if required by the General Instructions (17 CFR 249.1300), as applicable.
( b ) *When amendment is required—Form MA-I.* A registered municipal advisor shall promptly amend the information contained in Form MA-I (17 CFR 249.1310) by filing an amended Form MA-I whenever the information contained in the Form MA-I becomes inaccurate for any reason.
( c ) *Electronic filing of amendments.* A registered municipal advisor shall file all amendments to Form MA (17 CFR 249.1300) and Form MA-I (17 CFR 249.1310) electronically.
( d ) *Amendments to Form MA and Form MA-I are reports.* Each amendment required to be filed under this section shall constitute a report within the meaning of sections 15B(c), 17(a), 18(a), 32(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78 o -4(c), 78q(a), 78r(a), 78ff(a)) and other applicable provisions of the Act.
[78 FR 67633, Nov. 12, 2013]
#### § 229.301 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12a-9 Exemption of standardized options from section 12(a) of the Act.

The provisions of section 12(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78*l*(a)) do not apply in respect of any standardized option, as defined by section 240.9b-1(a)(4), issued by a clearing agency registered under section 17A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q-1) and traded on a national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78f(a)).

[68 FR 192, Jan. 2, 2003]
§ 201.112 Hearing officer: Disqualification and withdrawal. ( a ) *Notice of disqualification.* At any time a hearing officer believes himself or herself to be disqualified from considering a matter, the hearing officer shall issue a notice stating that he or she is withdrawing from the matter and setting forth the reasons therefor.
( b ) *Motion for withdrawal.* Any party who has a reasonable, good faith basis to believe that a hearing officer has a personal bias, or is otherwise disqualified from hearing a case, may make a motion to the hearing officer that the hearing officer withdraw. The motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit setting forth in detail the facts alleged to constitute grounds for disqualification. If the hearing officer finds himself or herself not disqualified, he or she shall so rule and shall continue to preside over the proceeding.
#### Hana Spicehandler, Respondent, v. City of New York, Defendant, and William Cohen, Appellant.

*756There is no evidence that appellant created a condition on the sidewalk dangerous to pedestrians. The most the evidence shows is that appellant, although removing snow and ice from the sidewalk on several occasions following storms, in the period between the blizzard of December 26, 1947, and the date of the accident, February 7, 1948, failed to remove all snow and ice. *(Zysk*v. *City of New York,*300 N. Y. 507; *Hendley*v. *Daw Drug Co.,*293 N. Y. 790.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
#### Westbury Electronics, Inc., Appellant, v. A & J Machinery Corporation, Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order, entered April 24,1953, granting defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the third and fifth causes of action of a complaint containing six causes of action, and from an order entered May 22,1953, granting defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, canceling the attachment bond, and discharging the surety. Order of April 24, 1953, insofar as appealed from, modified by striking from subdivision (3) of the ordering paragraph the words “ and Fifth causes ” and by substituting therefor the word “ cause,” and by adding after the word “ granted ”, the words “ with leave to plaintiff to amend the third cause of action, if so advised.” As so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed; the amended complaint to be served within ten days after the entry of the order hereon. Order of May 22, 1953, reversed and motion to vacate warrant of attachment denied. Appellant is granted one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The third cause of action, which seeks a return of the purchase price of a machine sold by defendant to plaintiff on the ground that it was not as warranted, is insufficient because there is no allegation of return or offer to return the machine, a prerequisite both under the terms of the contract and under the terms of the statute (Personal Property Law, § 150, subd. 1, par. [d]; subds. 3, 4). Judgment on the pleadings dismissing the fifth cause of action was improperly granted because that cause of action is sufficient on its face. It was dismissed on the basis of two exhibits attached to certain affidavits in conjunction with another motion, which exhibits were not part of the pleadings. Therefore, judgment on the pleadings as to the fifth cause of action was unauthorized. The warrant of attachment, issued December 3, 1952, may not |)e said to have been granted solely on the basis of the third cause of action appearing in the complaint, first served in February, 1953. The warrant was granted on the basis of an affidavit which contained what is now the first cause of action. That cause of action is concededly sufficient to authorize the granting of the warrant. That the first cause of action as presently pleaded demands judgment for a greater amount of damages than that for which the warrant was issued is immaterial. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Mac-Crate and Beldoek, JJ.
### §2000e–11. Veterans' special rights or preference

Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed to repeal or modify any Federal, State, territorial, or local law creating special rights or preference for veterans.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title VII, §712, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 265.)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3991 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3991

  To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from requiring that 
employers provide to the Board or to a labor organization the telephone 
                number or email address of any employee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2012

Mrs. Adams (for herself, Mr. Ross of Florida, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Burgess, 
 Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Jones, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Chaffetz, Mrs. 
   Lummis, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Posey, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Huelskamp, Mrs. 
  Blackburn, Mr. Webster, Mr. Mulvaney, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
   Pitts, Mr. Cole, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Walsh of 
 Illinois, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Yoder, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Pearce, Mr. 
  Ribble, Mr. Harris, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. 
    Kingston, Mr. Rivera, Mr. Calvert, and Mr. Mack) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from requiring that 
employers provide to the Board or to a labor organization the telephone 
                number or email address of any employee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Employees' Emails and Phones 
Secure Act'' or the ``KEEP Secure Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO ``EXCELSIOR'' LISTS.

    Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(6) In no circumstances shall the Board require an employer to 
provide to the Board or to a labor organization the telephone number or 
email address of any employee.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Cit y ofVisaRa 42 5 'Eas t OaiJlvenue , Suit e 301 , 'UisaRa, C A9329 1

Bo b Lin k Mayo r AmyShukliaa ^ Vic e Mayo r E . Warre n Guble r Councilmembe r Michae l Lan e Councilmembe r Steve n A . Nelse n Councilmembe r D<rr - 6«.T-2/>e4 - [<\^i( a 

# offic e o f the Mayor Tec
- (559 ) 713-451 2 TOO

Q (559 ) 713-480 0

Jul y7 , 201 0 C J o >

-• : ~- a O Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f: Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 400Seventf i Street , SW , Roome4 m " : V Washington , DC - 2059 0 - ^ " ^ Re : Orde rNo . 2008-5-4 2 Dea rMr . DeVany : Than k yo u fo rth e correspondenc e date d Jun e 4 , 2010 , requestin g fina l communit ycomment s o n Orde r2010-5-4 . Eve n thoug h ther e wa s onl yon e proposa l submitte d fo rou rcommunity , th e Cit y o fVisali a appreciate s th e opportunit yt o commen t o n th e respons e t o thi s order . Th e Cit yo fVisalia' s Ai rServic e Subcommitte e ha s reviewe d th e proposa l submitte d b yGrea t Lake s an d th e Cit yCounci l wishe s t o expres s thei rsuppor t fo rth e proposa l b yGrea t Lake s Aviatio n wit h th e preferenc e fo rservic e t o LAX . Grea t Lake s ha s bee n i n activ e discussion s wit h communit yleaders , py^ rth e pas t months , wit h regard s t o th e continuatio n o fservic e an d thei rplan s fo rchangin g th e hub.cjt yfo rloca l travelers ! A s a resul t o fthes e discussions , th e Cit yo fVisali a believe s tha t LA X presejit s th e greates t opportunit yt o increas e passenge rload s immediately . Historically , datin g bac k t o th e lat e 90's , ou rloca l traveler s hav e prove n tha t ther e i s a deman d fo rLAX servic e an d w e believ e tha t servic e t o thi s hu b airport provide s u s wit h th e greates t opportunit yt o gro wth e servic e an d ultimatel yoperat e subsid yfree . Th e Cit yo fVisalia , appreciate s th e Essentia l Ai rServic e progra m an d th e opportunit yit . offer s th e communit yt o continu e t o hav e ai rservice . Providin g ai rservic e i s a n jmpdrtari t aspec t o fou r economi cdevelopmen t efforts , an d I s als o key,t o ou rlong-ter m alternativ e transportatio n an d ai r qualit yobjectives . Respectfully , , . , • . , 

### ^~^)OIJ ^ Bo b Lin k Mayo r 

# ®
[DO NOT PUBLISH] 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-12544

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00445-AKK-RRA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

CORRY AVERETT,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

 (July 25, 2013)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 12-12544 Date Filed: 07/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Scott Linton, appointed counsel for Corry Averett, has moved to 

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, 

and Averett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12544 Date Filed: 07/25/2013 Page: 2 of 2
§ 230.238 Exemption for standardized options. ( a ) *Exemption.* Except as expressly provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Act does not apply to any standardized option, as that term is defined by section 240.9b-1(a)(4) of this chapter, that is: ( 1 ) Issued by a clearing agency registered under section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78q-1); and
( 2 ) Traded on a national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f(a)) or on a national securities association registered pursuant to section 15A(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 780-3(a)).
( b ) *Limitation.* The exemption provided in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the provisions of section 17 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77q).
( c ) *Offers and sales.* Any offer or sale of a standardized option by or on behalf of the issuer of the securities underlying the standardized option, an affiliate of the issuer, or an underwriter, will constitute a contract for sale of, sale of, offer for sale, or offer to sell the underlying securities as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(3)).
[68 FR 192, Jan. 2, 2003]
#### § 171.7 [Reserved]