alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15952. Federal-State regulatory coordination and assistance

#### (a) In general

At the request of the Governor of a State, the Administrator may enter into a refinery permitting cooperative agreement with the State, under which each party to the agreement identifies steps, including timelines, that it will take to streamline the consideration of Federal and State environmental permits for a new refinery.

#### (b) Authority under agreement

The Administrator shall be authorized to—

(1) accept from a refiner a consolidated application for all permits required from the Environmental Protection Agency, to the extent consistent with other applicable law;

(2) enter into memoranda of agreement with other Federal agencies to coordinate consideration of refinery applications and permits among Federal agencies; and

(3) enter into memoranda of agreement with a State, under which Federal and State review of refinery permit applications will be coordinated and concurrently considered, to the extent practicable.

#### (c) State assistance

The Administrator is authorized to provide financial assistance to State governments to facilitate the hiring of additional personnel with expertise in fields relevant to consideration of refinery permits.

#### (d) Other assistance

The Administrator is authorized to provide technical, legal, or other assistance to State governments to facilitate their review of applications to build new refineries.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §392, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 749.)
§ 229.1118 (Item 1118) Reports and additional information. ( a ) *Reports required under the transaction documents.* Describe the reports or other documents provided to security holders required under the transaction agreements, including information included, schedule and manner of distribution or other availability, and the entity or entities that will prepare and provide the reports.
( b ) *Reports to be filed with the Commission.* ( 1 ) Specify the names, and if available, the Commission file numbers of the entity or entities under which reports about the asset-backed securities will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Identify the reports and other information filed with the Commission.
( 2 ) State that the Commission maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission and state the address of that site (*http://www.sec.gov*).
( c ) *Web site access to reports.* ( 1 ) State whether the issuing entity's annual reports on Form 10-K (§ 249.310 of this chapter), distribution reports on Form 10-D (§ 249.312 of this chapter), current reports on Form 8-K (§ 249.308 of this chapter), and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) will be made available on the Web site of a specified transaction party (e.g., the sponsor, depositor, servicer, issuing entity or trustee) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Commission.
( 2 ) Disclose whether other reports to security holders or information about the asset-backed securities will be made available in this manner.
( 3 ) If filings and other reports will be made available in this manner, disclose the Web site address where such filings may be found.
( 4 ) If filings and other reports will not be made available in this manner, describe the reasons why they will not and whether an identified transaction party voluntarily will provide electronic or paper copies of those filings and other reports free of charge upon request.
[70 FR 1597, Jan. 7, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 967, Jan. 4, 2008; 83 FR 50211, Oct. 4, 2018]
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Jose
      Meleth, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(i)       
      The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)       
      The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Tally-Ho Ventures, Inc. (the
      “Company”).





Date:
      November 18, 2005





by: /s/
      Jose Meleth


Jose
      Meleth


Chief
      Financial Officer
§ 146.5 Disclosure of requested information to individuals; fee for copies of records. ( a ) Any individual who has requested access to his record or to any information pertaining to him in the manner prescribed in § 146.3, and has identified himself as prescribed in § 146.4, shall be permitted to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensible to him, subject to fees for copying services set forth in appendix A to this part. Upon his request persons of his own choosing may accompany him, but the individual shall first furnish a written statement authorizing discussion of that individual's record in the accompany persons' presence.
( b ) Access will generally be granted in the office of the Commission where the records are maintained during normal business hours, but for good cause shown the Commission may grant access at another office of the Commission or at different times for the convenience of the individual making the request.
( c ) Where a document containing information about an individual also contains information not pertaining to him, the portion not pertaining to the individual shall not be disclosed to him except to the extent the information is available to any person under the Freedom of Information Act. If the records sought cannot be provided for review and copying in a meaningful form, the Commission shall provide to the individual a report of the information concerning the individual contained in the record or records which shall be complete and accurate in all material aspects.
( d ) Where the disclosure involves medical records, the records may be provided only to a physician designated in writing by the individual.
( e ) Requests for copies of documents may be directed to the FOIA compliance staffr to the member of the Commission's staff through whom arrangements for access were made.
( f ) Fees for copies of records shall be charged as set forth in the schedule of fees contained in appendix A to this part. Copies of the schedule may be obtained upon request from the FOIA compliance staff in the Office of the General Counsel at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters and clearly marked “Privacy Act request”. . Payment should be made by check or money order payable to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Advance payment of all or part of the fee may be required at the discretion of the Commission, but generally this will not be required for requests where the anticipated fee is less than $25.
( g ) Nothing in this section or in § 146.3 shall: ( 1 ) Require the disclosure of investigative records exempted under § 146.12 of these rules;
( 2 ) Allow an individual access to any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action, administrative proceeding or a criminal proceeding;
( 3 ) Require the furnishing of information or records which cannot be retrieved by the name or other identifier of the individual making the request.
[41 FR 3212, Jan. 21, 1976, as amended at 41 FR 28261, July 9, 1976; 45 FR 26954, Apr. 22, 1980; 60 FR 49335, Sept. 25, 1995; 89 FR 71818, Sept. 4, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.735-16 Delegation.

Any official responsibility assigned to a person in a particular position pursuant to this subpart may be delegated by such person to any other person.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.54 Constitutional obligations.

The members of this Commission have undertaken in their oaths of office to support the Federal Constitution. Insofar as the enactments of the Congress impose executive duties upon the members, they must faithfully execute the laws which they are charged with administering. Members shall also carefully guard against any infringement of the constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities of those who are subject to regulation by this Commission.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 7, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-277 Lower Tribunal No. 18-41649

________________ 

### Ugo Colombo, et al. , Appellants,
vs. 

### Dacra Development, Corporation, et al. ,

Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge. Coffey Burlington, P.L., and Jeffrey B. Crockett; Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas E. Scott, and Daryl Greenberg, for appellants. Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller; Richard and Richard, P.A., and Dennis Richard, for appellees. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Phillips v. Garcia, 147 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (Recognizing that the trial court is in a superior position to determine whether the party or its counsel knew or should have known that the claim or defense asserted was not supported by the facts or the applicable law and concluding that the appellate court will reverse only if the record reflects that no reasonable trial judge could have denied the motion for sanctions under Florida Statute 57.105.).
### §18101. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–10, div. B, title VIII, §1858(a), Apr. 15, 2011, 125 Stat. 168

Section, Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10108(a)–(e), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 912, 913, related to free choice vouchers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 112–10 effective as if included in the provisions of, and the amendments made by, the provisions of Pub. L. 111–148 to which it relates, see section 1858(d) of Pub. L. 112–10, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 36B of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
§ 201.550 Summary suspensions pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(k)(1)(A). ( a ) *Petition for termination of suspension.* Any person adversely affected by a suspension pursuant to Section 12(k)(1)(A) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78 l (k)(1)(A), who desires to show that such suspension is not necessary in the public interest or for the protection of investors may file a sworn petition with the Secretary, requesting that the suspension be terminated. The petition shall set forth the reasons why the petitioner believes that the suspension of trading should not continue and state with particularity the facts upon which the petitioner relies.
( b ) *Commission consideration of a petition.* The Commission, in its discretion, may schedule a hearing on the matter, request additional written submissions, or decide the matter on the facts presented in the petition and any other relevant facts known to the Commission. If the petitioner fails to cooperate with, obstructs, or refuses to permit the making of an examination by the Commission, such conduct shall be grounds to deny the petition.
exv10w60



 






Exhibit 10.60



January 17, 2006




Pacific Growth Equities, LLC

One Bush Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, CA 94104

Attn: George J. Milstein



Re: Advisory Fee Arrangement



Ladies and Gentlemen:




     This letter agreement confirms the advisory fee arrangement between Cytokinetics,
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Cytokinetics”) and Pacific Growth Equities, LLC
(“PacGrow”), pursuant to which Cytokinetics will pay PacGrow a $1,000,000 advisory fee out of
the gross offering proceeds received by Cytokinetics for an investment in Cytokinetics’ common
stock in a registered direct transaction that is expected to close the week of January 15, 2006
(the “Offering”).



     Cytokinetics will pay this fee upon the closing of the Offering. No fee will be due if the
Offering does not close by January 27, 2006. For the avoidance of doubt, no fee will be due
under this agreement for any other offering by the Company, whether to the investors that are
proposed to invest in the Offering or other investors.



     PGE shall be under no obligation hereunder to make an independent appraisal of assets or
investigation or inquiry as to any information regarding, or any representations of, the
Company and shall have no liability hereunder in regard thereto. Cytokinetics agrees to
indemnify and hold PacGrow, its directors, officers, employees and agents harmless from and
against all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys’ fees) incurred in defending, settling or compromising any third party claims
relating to PacGrow’s services in connection with the Offering, other than those arising from
PacGrow’s negligence or willful misconduct. The foregoing indemnification obligation is
subject to: (i) PacGrow providing Cytokinetics with prompt written notice of any claim for
which PacGrow wishes to seek indemnification hereunder; (ii) Cytokinetics having sole control
of the defense and all negotiations for settlement or compromise of such claim; and (iii)
PacGrow fully cooperating in the defense of such claim. PacGrow may elect to participate in any
such action with counsel of its own choice and at its own expense.



 









 





     This letter agreement will be governed by California law, without regard to
conflict-of-law principles. This letter agreement represents the complete and final agreement
between Cytokinetics and PacGrow with respect to the foregoing matters and supercedes all prior
and contemporaneous agreements between Cytokinetics and PacGrow with respect to the Offering.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	/s/
Sharon Surrey-Barbari 
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Sharon Surrey-Barbari
	 

	 	SVP, Finance and Chief Financial Officer






	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted	 	 
	Pacific Growth Equities, LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ George J. Milstein	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	George J. Milstein	 	 
	Title:
	 	Head of Investment Banking	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	1/17/06	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





 -2-
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT & NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT, RONALD FEINSTEIN



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT 
  
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), made this 6th day of January,
2006, is entered into by and among Lifeline Systems, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“Lifeline”), and Ronald Feinstein (the “Employee”) and amends that certain Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, effective as of
May 1, 2003 (the “Original Agreement”), by and among Lifeline and the Employee. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning for such terms set forth in the Original Agreement. 
  
 WHEREAS, on December 7, 2005 the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Lifeline approved certain amendments to the Original Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Lifeline and the Employee wish to amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the amendments approved by the Compensation Committee. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lifeline and the Employee hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1. The first sentence of Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by changing the date “May 1, 2008” to “May 1,
2011,” such date representing the ending date of the initial Employment Period. 
  
 2. In connection with Section 1 of this Amendment, the second sentence of Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by changing the phrase “five-year term” to “eight-year
term.” 
  
 3. Effective March 1, 2006, Section 2.1
of the Original Agreement is hereby amended by changing the amount “$340,000” to “$410,000,” such amount representing the minimum annualized base salary of the Employee. 
  
 4. As additional compensation for the Employee’s employment under the
Original Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, Lifeline granted to the Employee as of December 7, 2005 sixty thousand (60,000) shares of Lifeline Common Stock. Such award was granted pursuant to the Incentive Plan and the Restricted
Stock Agreement in the form attached as Exhibit A to this Amendment. 
  
 5. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and all references to the Original Agreement shall hereinafter be
deemed to be references to the Original Agreement, as amended by this Amendment. 
  
 6. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

  

			
	 LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    L. DENNIS SHAPIRO        
	 Name:
	 	L. Dennis Shapiro
	 Title:
	 	Chairman
	
	/s/    RONALD
FEINSTEIN        
	Ronald Feinstein


  

 2
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 24, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A0220. JESUS GARIBAY v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On September 13, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than September 23, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Study on oxides of nitrogen andcarbon formation in diesel engines**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:EP 1.2:OX 3/13/VOL.1-2
Item Number:0431-I-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001101895
 
July 3, 2019
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# for tbe jf

# eberaI (!Circuit

IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC.
2012-1279 (Reexamination No. 90/011,023) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board ofPatent Appeals and Interferences.


### ON MOTION
Before DYK, 

### Circuit Judge. 

### ORDER Vegas Amusement, Inc. moves without opposition for the court to take judicial notice of certain documents available online and cited in its reply briefbefore the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Judicial notice may be appropriate with respect to certain documents outside of the record. However, the relevance ofsuch materials is left to.the discretion ofthe merits panel. Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. Case: 12-1279 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 09/28/2012IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC. (2) A copy ofthis order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case. FOR THE COURT 2



## SEP 282012 Date

cc: Michael Dergosits, Esq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s26 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

## u.a.cauwft~ FOR THEFEDERALClRCutT 

## SEP 282012 .W4

### tlllBALV 

## WRK Case: 12-1279 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 09/28/2012
From: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent: 05/15/2012 08:26 AM

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte 

Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: Bounding Analysis for PC

Hello CortneyPlease find attached the bounding analysis that represents limits if anything remotely considered waste, 

was removed from the MACT analysis.

THANKS.

(See attached file: Bounding analysis(2)051412.docx)

(See attached file: Bounding analysis Attachment_A(2)051412.xlsx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS - US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541-2825
PUBLIC LAW 115–386—DEC. 21, 2018 132 STAT. 5161 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 7120: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 27, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–386 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend through 2023 

the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money penalties 

on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and published by the Commission. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY 

OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH 2023. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the 

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2018’’ and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2023’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the earlier of— 

(1) December 31, 2018; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

52 USC 30109 

note. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 7120] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS