alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 384 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 384

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2011

     Ms. Lee of California (for herself, Ms. Moore, Ms. Fudge, Mr. 
  Faleomavaega, Ms. Bordallo, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Rush, Mr. Connolly of 
Virginia, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas, Mr. Moran, Ms. Norton, 
  Ms. Richardson, Ms. Sutton, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Holt, Mr. 
  Grijalva, Mr. Payne, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Towns, Ms. Eddie Bernice 
Johnson of Texas, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Petri, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Hastings 
 of Florida, Mr. Honda, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Stark, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Polis, 
and Mrs. Maloney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Peace Stamp for the Peace Corps 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall, for a 2-
year period beginning no later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, issue a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.
    (b) Requirements and Authorities.--The issuance of such semipostal 
and the disposition of the amounts becoming available from the issuance 
of such semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, subject to the following:
            (1) The differential included in the rate of postage 
        established for such semipostal under section 416(c) of such 
        title may not exceed 25 percent.
            (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to which any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of such semipostal may 
        be transferred under section 416(d)(1) of such title.
    (c) Semipostal Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``semipostal'' has the meaning given such term by section 416(a)(1) of 
such title.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1616.63 Policy regarding garment production unit identification.

No provision of 16 CFR 1616.31(b)(7) prohibits placement of a garment production unit identification on a label containing other information. Provided, however, that when the garment production unit identification appears on a label containing other information, provisions of § 1616.31(b)(6) require that the garment production unit identification must be set forth separately from any other information appearing on the same label, and that information not required by the applicable enforcement regulation (§ 1616.31), but placed on the same label with the garment production unit identification, shall not interfere with the garment production unit identification.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0064:  CRGR Response to Staff Requirements-SECY-15-0129 Commission Involvement in Early Stages of Rulemaking

Accession Number: ML16075A365

Date Released: Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16070A214 - SECY-16-0064:  CRGR Response to Staff Requirement-SECY-15-0129 Commission Involvement in Early Stages of Rulemaking (4 page(s), 5/23/2016)
    - ML16075A364 - SECY-16-0064:  Enclosure - Guidance for deciding When to Request the Committee to Review Generic Requirements Review of a Rulemaking Package (3 page(s), 5/23/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §13219. United States Postal Service

#### (a) Omitted

#### (b) Coordination

To the maximum extent practicable, the Postmaster General shall coordinate the Postal Service's alternative fueled vehicle procurement, placement, refueling, and maintenance programs with those at the Federal, State, and local level. The Postmaster General shall communicate, share, and disseminate, on a regular basis, information on such programs with the Secretary, the Administrator of General Services, and heads of appropriate Federal agencies.

#### (c) Program criteria

The Postmaster General shall consider the following criteria in the procurement and placement of alternative fueled vehicles:

(1) The procurement plans of State and local governments and other public and private institutions.

(2) The current and future availability of refueling and repair facilities.

(3) The reduction in emissions of the Postal fleet.

(4) Whether the vehicle is to be used in a nonattainment area as specified in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

(5) The operational requirements of the Postal fleet.

(6) The contribution to the reduction in the consumption of oil in the transportation sector.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title III, §311, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, referred to in subsec. (c)(4), probably means Pub. L. 101–549, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2399. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1990 Amendment note set out under section 7401 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Subsec. (a) of this section, which required the Postmaster General to biennially submit to Congress a report on the Postal Service's alternative fueled vehicle program, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, the 15th item on page 194 of House Document No. 103–7.
Exhibit 10.3(b)


      Schedule of Warrant (new financings after October 31, 2005) Issued by
             NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on January 11, 2006


                      Expiration                                      Shares
     Grant Date          Date            Exercise Price               Granted
     ----------         -----            --------------               -------
      01/11/06        01/11/11       Greater of:  (i) $0.0034;      20,000,000
                                     or (ii) the par value of
                                     NCT Group, Inc.
                                     common stock on the
                                     date of exercise
536.7107 Contract Clauses.

(a) FAR deviation. GSA has a FAR deviation that allows use of the clause 552.236-79 in lieu of the

FAR clause at 52.216-17. Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 552.236-79,

Construction-Manager-As-Constructor, in solicitations and contracts if construction, dismantling, or

removal of improvements is contemplated when a CMc project delivery method will be followed in

lieu of the FAR clause at 52.216-17.

(b)Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 552.236-80, Accounting Records and

Progress Payments, in solicitations and contracts if construction, dismantling, or removal of

improvements is contemplated when a CMc project delivery method will be followed and cost

accounting standards do not apply. This clause is used when the clauses at FAR 52.230-2 Cost

Accounting Standards, FAR 52.230-3 Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices, and

FAR 52.230-6 Administration of Cost Accounting Standards do not apply.

Parent topic: Subpart 536.71 - Construction-Manager-as-Constructor Contracting
No: II-14-005 February 21, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Seismic Plan at Westinghouse Fuel Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Monday, Feb. 24 to 

discuss the Westinghouse Fuel Facility’s modified plans for withstanding earthquakes.

The Westinghouse facility, which fabricates fuel assemblies for commercial power reactors 

using low-enriched uranium dioxide, is located near Columbia, S.C.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1:30 p.m. EST in the NRC’s Region II office at 245 

Peachtree Center Ave., NE in Atlanta. The meeting will be open to the public and NRC officials will be 

available after the meeting to answer any questions. Anyone interested in attending the meeting or 

participating by telephone should contact the NRC’s Patricia Glenn at 404-997-4442 or via email at 

Patricia.Glenn@nrc.gov.

At the meeting, Westinghouse officials will provide the results of the facility’s Seismic 

Improvement Plan. Following the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Fukushima, Japan, NRC encouraged 

all nuclear fuel facilities to re-analyze their ability to withstand a significant seismic event.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.12a-6 Exemption of securities underlying certain options from section 12(a). ( a ) When used in this rule, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated unless the context otherwise requires: ( 1 ) The term *option* shall include any put, call, spread, straddle, or other option or privilege of buying a security from or selling a security to another without being bound to do so, but such term shall not include any such option where the writer is: The issuer of the security which may be purchased or sold upon exercise of the option, or is a person that directly, or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with such issuer;
( 2 ) The term *underlying security* means a security which relates to or is the subject of an option.
( b ) Any underlying security shall be exempt from the operation of section 12(a) of the Act if all of the following terms and conditions are met: ( 1 ) The related option is duly listed and registered on a national securities exchange;
( 2 ) The only transactions on such exchange with respect to such underlying securities consist of the delivery of and payment for such underlying securities pursuant to the terms of such options relating to the exercise thereof; and
( 3 ) Such underlying security is ( i ) duly listed and registered on another national securities exchange at the time the option is issued; or
( ii ) duly quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”) at the time the option is issued.
(Secs. 3(a)(12); 48 Stat. 882, 84 Stat. 718, 1435, 1499 (15 U.S.C. 78(c)))
[38 FR 11449, May 8, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 20203, May 15, 1985]
### §13522. Energy Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercial Application Advisory Board

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish an Energy Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercial Application Advisory Board (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Advisory Board").

#### (b) Responsibilities

The Advisory Board shall provide impartial technical advice to the Secretary to assist in the development of energy research, development, demonstration, and commercial application plans and reports under sections 5905 and 5914 1 of this title, under section 7321 of this title, and as otherwise provided in subchapters VIII through XI of this chapter. The Advisory Board shall also periodically review such plans and reports and their implementation in relation to the goals stated in section 13401 of this title, and report the results of such review to the Secretary and the Congress. Such report shall be included as part of the report required under section 5914 1 of this title.

#### (c) Use of existing advisory board

The Secretary may use an existing advisory board to carry out the responsibilities described in subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXIII, §2302, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3092.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapters VIII through XI of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "titles XX through XXIII of this Act", meaning titles XX through XXIII of Pub. L. 102–486, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3057–3092, which enacted subchapters VIII through XI of this chapter and amended sections 5103, 5107, 5108, 5110, 5307, 5905, 12003, 12004, and 12006 of this title.

Section 5914 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was omitted from the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Boards

Advisory boards established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a board established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such board is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a board established by Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law. See sections 1001(2) and 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 802.8 Certain supervisory acquisitions. ( a ) A merger, consolidation, purchase of assets, or acquisition requiring agency approval under sections 403 or 408(e) of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1726, 1730a(e), or under section 5 of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, 12 U.S.C. 1464, shall be exempt from the requirements of the act, including specifically the filing requirement of Section 7A(c)(8), if the agency whose approval is required finds that approval of such merger, consolidation, purchase of assets, or acquisition is necessary to prevent the probable failure of one of the institutions involved.
( b ) ( 1 ) A merger, consolidation, purchase of assets, or acquisition which requires agency approval under 12 U.S.C. 1817(j) or 12 U.S.C. 1730(q) shall be exempt from the requirements of the act if copies of all information and documentary materials filed with any such agency are contemporaneously filed with the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General at least 30 days prior to consummation of the proposed acquisition.
( 2 ) A transaction described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be exempt from the requirements of the act, including specifically the filing requirement, if the agency whose approval is required finds that approval of such transaction is necessary to prevent the probable failure of one of the institutions involved.
[43 FR 33544, July 31, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 34436, July 29, 1983; 67 FR 11903, Mar. 18, 2002]
§ 3.44 Record. ( a ) *Reporting and transcription.* Hearings shall be stenographically reported and transcribed by the official reporter of the Commission under the supervision of the Administrative Law Judge, and the original transcript shall be a part of the record and the sole official transcript. Upon a motion by any party, for good cause shown the Administrative Law Judge may order that the live oral testimony of all witnesses be video recorded digitally, at the expense of the moving party, and in such cases the video recording and the written transcript of the testimony shall be made part of the record. If a video recording is so ordered, the moving party shall not pay or retain any person or entity to perform such recording other than the reporter designated by the Commission to transcribe the proceeding, except by order of the Administrative Law Judge upon a finding of good cause. In any order allowing for video recording by a person or entity other than the Commission's designated reporter, the Administrative Law Judge shall prescribe standards and procedures for the video recording to ensure that it is a complete and accurate record of the witnesses' testimony. Copies of the written transcript and video recording are available from the reporter at rates not to exceed the maximum rates fixed by contract between the Commission and the reporter. Copies of a video recording made by a person or entity other than the reporter shall be available at the same rates, or no more than the actual cost of duplication, whichever is higher.
( b ) *Corrections.* Corrections of the official transcript may be made only when they involve errors affecting substance and then only in the manner herein provided. Corrections ordered by the Administrative Law Judge or agreed to in a written stipulation signed by all counsel and parties not represented by counsel, and approved by the Administrative Law Judge, shall be included in the record, and such stipulations, except to the extent they are capricious or without substance, shall be approved by the Administrative Law Judge. Corrections shall not be ordered by the Administrative Law Judge except upon notice and opportunity for the hearing of objections. Such corrections shall be made by the official reporter by furnishing substitute type pages, under the usual certificate of the reporter, for insertion in the official record. The original uncorrected pages shall be retained in the files of the Commission.
( c ) *Closing of the hearing record.* Upon completion of the evidentiary hearing, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an order closing the hearing record after giving the parties 3 business days to determine if the record is complete or needs to be supplemented. The Administrative Law Judge shall retain the discretion to permit or order correction of the record as provided in § 3.44(b).
[74 FR 1832, Jan. 13, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 52252, Aug. 22, 2011]
§ 230.151 Safe harbor definition of certain “annuity contracts or optional annuity contracts” within the meaning of section 3(a)(8). ( a ) Any annuity contract or optional annuity contract (a *contract*) shall be deemed to be within the provisions of section 3(a)(8) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(8)), *Provided,* That ( 1 ) The annuity or optional annuity contract is issued by a corporation (the *insurer*) subject to the supervision of the insurance commissioner, bank commissioner, or any agency or officer performing like functions, of any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia;
( 2 ) The insurer assumes the investment risk under the contract as prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 3 ) The contract is not marketed primarily as an investment.
( b ) The insurer shall be deemed to assume the investment risk under the contract if: ( 1 ) The value of the contract does not vary according to the investment experience of a separate account;
( 2 ) The insurer for the life of the contract ( i ) Guarantees the principal amount of purchase payments and interest credited thereto, less any deduction (without regard to its timing) for sales, administrative or other expenses or charges; and
( ii ) Credits a specified rate of interest (as defined in paragraph (c) of this section to net purchase payments and interest credited thereto; and
( 3 ) The insurer guarantees that the rate of any interest to be credited in excess of that described in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section will not be modifed more frequently than once per year.
( c ) The term *specified rate of interest,* as used in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, means a rate of interest under the contract that is at least equal to the minimum rate required to be credited by the relevant nonforfeiture law in the jurisdiction in which the contract is issued. If that jurisdiction does not have any applicable nonforfeiture law at the time the contract is issued (or if the minimum rate applicable to an existing contract is no longer mandated in that jurisdiction), the specified rate under the contract must at least be equal to the minimum rate then required for individual annuity contracts by the NAIC Standard Nonforfeiture Law.
[51 FR 20262, June 4, 1986]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allen Charles Sebast, Appellant.

[819 NYS2d 625]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hall, J.), rendered August 31, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree.

Defendant was charged in a six-count indictment with, among other things, repeatedly raping a five-year-old girl. He thereafter pleaded guilty to a single count of rape in the first degree and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to 20 years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

Initially, to the extent that defendant challenges the voluntariness of his plea, his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders the matter unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Turner,*27 AD3d 962, 962 [2006]; *People v Mabry,*27 AD3d 835, 836 [2006]). As for defendant’s claim that County Court erred in failing to order a competency hearing prior to accepting his guilty plea, we note that defendant was “presumed to be competent and, absent reasonable grounds to believe that [he] was incapable of assisting in his defense or of understanding the proceedings against him, *616he was not entitled to a competency hearing” *(People v Reynolds,*290 AD2d 591, 591-592 [2002]; *see People v Planty,*238 AD2d 806, 807 [1997], *lv denied*89 NY2d 1098 [1997]). A review of the record reveals no such reasonable grounds, particularly in view of the fact that defendant acknowledged during the plea hearing that he understood his rights, stated that he was not under the influence of any drugs, alcohol or medication which made him confused or unable to comprehend the proceedings, expressed his desire to plead guilty and unequivocally admitted the facts underlying the crime (see *People v Planty, supra*at 807). Finally, defendant’s assertion that his counsel was ineffective in failing to request a competency hearing and/or pursue a diminished capacity defense is also unpreserved for our review (see *People v Gambaccini,*2 AD3d 1065, 1066 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 739 [2004]) and, in any event, is lacking in merit for the reasons expressed above.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.