alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.13 Additions to Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral. ( a ) ( 1 ) At the election of the derivatives clearing organization or Collecting Futures Commission Merchant, the collateral requirement referred to in § 22.12(a), (c), and (d) applicable to a particular Cleared Swaps Customer or group of Cleared Swaps Customers may be increased based on an evaluation of the credit risk posed by such Cleared Swaps Customer or group, in which case the derivatives clearing organization or Collecting Futures Commission Merchant shall collect and record such higher amount as provided in § 22.12.
( 2 ) Nothing in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is intended to interfere with the right of a futures commission merchant to increase the collateral requirements at such futures commission merchant with respect to any of its Cleared Swaps Customers, Futures Customers (as § 1.3 of this chapter defines that term), or Foreign Futures or Foreign Options Customers (as § 30.1 of this chapter defines that term).
( b ) Any collateral deposited by a futures commission merchant (including a Depositing Futures Commission Merchant) pursuant to § 22.2(e)(3)(ii) of this part, which collateral is identified as such futures commission merchant's own property may be used by the derivatives clearing organization or Collecting Futures Commission Merchant, as applicable, to margin, guarantee or secure the Cleared Swaps of any or all of such Cleared Swaps Customers.
( c ) A futures commission merchant may transmit to a derivatives clearing organization any collateral posted by a Cleared Swaps Customer in excess of the amount required by the derivatives clearing organization if: ( 1 ) the rules of the derivatives clearing organization expressly permit the futures commission merchant to transmit collateral in excess of the amount required by the derivatives clearing organization; and
( 2 ) the derivatives clearing organization provides a mechanism by which the futures commission merchant is able to, and maintains rules pursuant to which the futures commission merchant is required to, identify each Business Day, for each Cleared Swaps Customer, the amount of collateral posted in excess of the amount required by the derivatives clearing organization.
[77 FR 6371, Feb. 7, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 66335, Nov. 2, 2012]
#### Alfred Chomiak, Respondent, v. Jack Stanley, Appellant, and Irving Schultz, Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
June 18, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-15-0048 – REQUEST FOR 

APPROVAL OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE 

BABCOCK AND WILCOX NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUPLYNCHBURG TO USE SECTION 161A PREEMPTION 

AUTHORITY 

The Commission has approved authorization for use of Atomic Energy Act Section 161A 

preemption authority by Babcock and Wilcox Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. (B&W NOG) at the 

B&W NOG-Lynchburg facility. The Commission has authorized the Director of the Office of

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards to complete the required license amendment actions 

and issue the draft Final Confirmatory Orders included in SECY-15-0048, subject to the 

enclosed edit being made to the Order. The staff should coordinate with the Office of the 

Secretary to finalize and issue the letter to the Governor of Virginia concurrent with issuance of 

the final Confirmatory Orders and the associated Federal Register notice. 

 

Enclosure: 

Changes to the Confirmatory Order and Letter 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR 

SECY Note: This SRM to be released to the public 5 working days after issuance of the letter to 

the Governor. 
Enclosure 

Changes to the Confirmatory Order and Letter in SECY-15-0048 

Change to the Confirmatory Order

1. On page 2, paragraph (2), revise line 1 to read ‘There is reasonable assurance that tThe 

facilities ....’ 

Changes to the Letter to the Governor

2. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 1 and 2 to read ‘ ... Commission (Commission or

NRC), I am writing to informing you that of an action the Commission is taking to

granting a limited ....’ 

3. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 5 and 6 to read ‘ ... 1954 (AEA), as amended ....’ 

4. On page 1, 1st paragraph, revise lines 8 to read ‘ ... notwithstanding local, State, local, 

and certain Federal firearms laws (including regulations) that ....’ 

5. On page 1, 2nd paragraph, revise line 2 to read ‘ ... 161A of the AEA, through ....’ 

6. On page 1, 2nd paragraph, revise lines 4 through 8 to delete everything after ‘ ... issued 

an order ...” and continue the sentence from the following paragraph. 

7. On page 1, 3rd paragraph, revise line 1 to read ‘The order designatinged B&W ...’ and 

move this to follow the revised sentence at the end of the 2nd paragraph. 

8. On page 1, 4th paragraph, revise lines 1 and 2 to read ‘ ... order that will be issued by the 

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards following issuance of this letter in 

accordance with established NRC processes.’
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6221** 

ANTHONY STORY , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. RICHMOND CITY JAIL, Jail/Institution , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 01370

- TSE

- TRJ )

Submitted : June 19, 2014 Decided: June 24, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Anthony Story, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Story seeks to appeal dismissing his compla int without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed . R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Story seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Invision Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic
Report”), I, Frank J. Rigney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|3. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|4. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date: January 06, 2005

/s/ Frank J. Rigney

Frank J. Rigney 
  Chief Financial Officer

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

September 30, 2005

Name
Address

Dear Sir/Madam,

As has been previously discussed with you and approved by the board of directors
of Synovis Life Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), that portion of your options
granted on December 1, 2004 to purchase 9,000 shares of Company common stock,
which would otherwise have vested on December 1, 2007, will be terminated,
without further consideration to you, effective September 30, 2005

The balance of your options granted on December 1, 2004 to purchase 18,000
shares of the Company stock, 9,000 of which vest on December 1, 2005 and 9,000
of which vest on December 1, 2006, are not effected by this action.

Please sign this letter below to document your consent to the termination of
these options.

Should you have further questions, feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Brett Reynolds
VP of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Synovis Life Technologies, Inc.

I hereby consent to the termination of options to purchase 9,000 shares of
Synovis Life Techonologies, Inc. common stock that were granted to me on
December 1, 2004 and were scheduled to vest on December 1, 2007.

Signature: ________________________________________
           Name

Date: ____________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Graeme  Scott,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/    Graeme Scott
Graeme Scott
President, C.E.O., and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


August 10, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **6660**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GREGORY L. WALKER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 7:07

- cr - 00076

- BR

- 1; 7:10

- cv - 00176

- BR )

Submitted : October 26, 2012 Decided: November 1, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gregory L. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory L. Walker appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 201 2 ) motion. Walker raised four claims in the district court but his sole issue on appeal is whe ther the district court should have retroactively applied the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Carachuri

- Rosendo v. Holder , 130 S. Ct. 2577 (2010) , to analyze the validity of his predicate offenses relied upon for his career offender enhancement. We have rece ntly determined that Carachuri claims may not be raised retroactively in collateral proceedings. See United States v. Powell , 6 91 F.3d 554 (4th Cir. 2012)
. Accordingly, we affirm. Because we confine our review on appeal to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief ,
see 4th Cir. R. 34(b) , and Walker’s informal brief does not challenge the remainder of the district court’s disposition, Walker has forfeited appellate review of the other issues decided in the district court’s order. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §14131. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14131 was editorially reclassified as section 12591 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/ CHASE CAREYChase Carey
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|May 5, 2006                                                      |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     April 28, 2014





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








1


---




ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.


On April 28, 2014, the registrant issued a press release and posted on its website ( www.cna.com ) a financial supplement providing information on its results of operations for the first quarter 2014.  The press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and the financial supplement is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Form 8-K.


The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  The information under Item 2.02 and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 in this Current Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.


(d) Exhibits:


See Exhibit Index.





2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  April 28, 2014By/s/ D. Craig Mense(Signature)D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued April 28, 2014, providing information on the first quarter  2014 results of operations.99.2CNA Financial Corporation financial supplement, posted on its website April 28, 2014, providing supplemental financial information on the first quarter 2014.





4
#### In the Matter of Thomas McNamara, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[820 NYS2d 797]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered January 10, 2005, which denied the petition to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-k (the Heart Bill), and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Objective medical evidence supports the Medical Board’s finding that petitioner’s cardiomyopathy is due to a mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction unrelated to his nonobstructive coronary artery disease or recently diagnosed and well-controlled hypertension, and suffices to rebut the statutory presumption that the cardiomyopathy is job related *(see Matter of Seldon v Kelly,*21 AD3d 840 [2005]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C AT AL I NA J I ME NE Z C AS T I L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73635 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 291- 755 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a t a l i naJ i m e ne z C a s t i l l o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l , a nd de c l i ni ng t o r e i ns t a t e he rvol unt aryde partur e pe r i od. W e ha ve 

# FI LED JU L 23 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73635 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e the a g e n c y ’s c o n tin u o u s p h y s ic a l p r e s e n c e f in d in g . L an di n-Zavala v. G on zales , 488 F . 3d 1150, 1151 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . W e de nyi n parta nd gr anti n partthe pe t i t i on f or rev i ew , an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t J im e n e z C a s tillo f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h the r e qui s i t e c ont i nuous phy s i c a lpr e s e nc e f orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l w he r e he rt e s t i m onyc onf l i c t e d w i th the a f

f i da vi t s s he s ubm i tt e d r e gar di ng p r e s e n c e . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b (b)( 1)(A ), (d)( 1). A s the go vernm entac kn ow l edges, the re cord cont ai ns evi dence thatJi m enez C a s tillo tim e lyf

ile dp r o o f

o f p o s tin g h e rv o lu n taryd e p artu r e b o n d . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 24 0. 26 (c )( 3)(i i ). W e there fore re m and t o the B IA t o d et erm i ne Ji m enez C a s tillo ’s e lig ib ilityf

o rr e in s ta te m e n t o f

v o lu n taryd e p artu r e . J i m e ne z C a s t i l l o’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e una va i l i ng. T h e p a rt i e s wi l l b e a rth e i ro wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n t o r e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; R E M A N D E D .
#### § 210.12-12C [Reserved]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00126

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .J.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2017

- FAM

- 61161

- 5

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant C.S

. , although she is exempt fro m payment due to her inability to pay
costs. We further order this decision certified below for observa nce. August 1, 2019
§ 204.63 Notice. ( a ) At least 30 days before the initiation of garnishment proceedings, the Commission will mail, by first class mail to the debtor's last known address, a written notice informing the debtor of: ( 1 ) The nature and amount of the debt;
( 2 ) The Commission's intention to initiate proceedings to collect the debt through deductions from pay until the debt and all accumulated interest, penalties and administrative costs are paid in full; and
( 3 ) An explanation of the debtor's rights, including those set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, and the time frame within which the debtor may exercise these rights.
( b ) The debtor will be afforded the opportunity: ( 1 ) To inspect and copy records related to the debt;
( 2 ) To enter into a written repayment agreement with the Commission, under terms agreeable to the Commission; and
( 3 ) To the extent that a debt owed has not been established by judicial or administrative order, to request a hearing concerning the existence or amount of the debt or the terms of the debt's repayment schedule. With respect to debts established by a judicial or administrative order, a debtor may request a hearing concerning the payment or other discharge of the debt. The debtor is not entitled to a hearing concerning the terms of the proposed repayment schedule if these terms have been established by written agreement under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( c ) The notice required by this section may be included with the Commission's demand letter required by subpart A of this part.
( d ) The Commission will keep a copy of the certificate of service indicating the date of mailing of the notice.