Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 7275 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 23, 2013. 

Steven Bradbury, 

Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.418 add paragraph (a)(3) to 

read as follows: 

§ 180.418 Cypermethrin and an isomer 

alpha-cypermethrin; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) * * * 

(3) Tolerances are established for 

residues of the insecticide, alphacypermethrin, (R)-cyano(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl (1S,3S)-rel-3- 

(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropane carboxylate, 

including its metabolites and 

degradates, in or on the commodities in 

the table below. Compliance with the 

tolerance levels specified below is to be 

determined by measuring only total 

cypermethrin, cyano(3- 

phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3-(2,2- 

dichloroethenyl)-2,2- 

dimethylcyclopropane carboxylate, in or 

on the commodity. 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Alfalfa, hay .................................. 15 

Beet, sugar, roots ....................... 0 .05 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Beet, sugar, tops ........................ 0 .20 

Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A ................................. 2 .0 

Cattle, fat .................................... 1 .0 

Cattle, meat ................................ 0 .20 

Cattle, meat byproducts ............. 0 .05 

Citrus, dried pulp ........................ 1 .8 

Citrus, oil ..................................... 4 .0 

Corn, field, grain ......................... 0 .05 

Corn, pop, grain .......................... 0 .05 

Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob 

with husks removed ................ 0 .05 

Cotton, undelinted seed ............. 0 .50 

Egg ............................................. 0 .05 

Fruit, citrus, group 10–10 ........... 10 

Goat, fat ...................................... 1 .0 

Goat, meat .................................. 0 .20 

Goat, meat byproducts ............... 0 .05 

Hog, fat ....................................... 1 .0 

Hog, meat ................................... 0 .05 

Horse, fat .................................... 1 .0 

Horse, meat ................................ 0 .20 

Horse, meat byproducts ............. 0 .05 

Milk, fat, reflecting 0.10 ppm in 

whole milk ............................... 2 .5 

Nut, tree, group 14–12 ............... 0 .05 

Pea and bean, dried shelled, except soybean, subgroup 6C .... 0 .05 

Pea and bean, succulent 

shelled, subgroup 6B .............. 0 .10 

Poultry, fat .................................. 0 .05 

Poultry, meat .............................. 0 .05 

Rice, grain .................................. 1 .5 

Sheep, fat ................................... 1 .0 

Sheep, meat ............................... 0 .20 

Sheep, meat byproducts ............ 0 .05 

Sorghum, grain, grain ................. 0 .50 

Soybean, seed ............................ 0 .05 

Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 ...... 0 .20 

Vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10 .. 0 .20 

Vegetable, leafy, group 4 ........... 10 

Vegetable, legume, edible podded, subgroup 6A ................... 0 .50 

Vegetable, root and tuber, group 

1, except sugar beet ............... 0 .10 

Wheat, grain ............................... 0 .20 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–02206 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0789; FRL–9376–1] 

2-Pyrrolidone, 1-Ethenyl-, Polymer 

With Ethenol; Tolerance Exemption 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 2-pyrrolidone, 

1-ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol; when 

used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide 

formulation. Sekisui Specialty 

Chemicals America, LLC submitted a 

petition to EPA under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 

requesting an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance. This 

regulation eliminates the need to 

establish a maximum permissible level 

for residues of 2-pyrrolidone, 

1-ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol on 

food or feed commodities. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

February 1, 2013. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before April 2, 2013, and must be 

filed in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0789, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Lieu, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–0079; email address: 

Lieu.David@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7276 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http:// 

ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ 

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. Can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2012–0789 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before April 2, 2013. Addresses for mail 

and hand delivery of objections and 

hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 

178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2012–0789, by one of the following 

methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Background and Statutory Findings 

In the Federal Register of December 

19, 2012 (77 FR 75082) (FRL–9372–6), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, 

announcing the receipt of a pesticide 

petition (PP 2E8082) filed by Sekisui 

Specialty Chemicals America, LLC, 900 

Gemini Ave., Suite A, Houston, TX 

77058. The petition requested that 40 

CFR 180.960 be amended by 

establishing an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer 

with ethenol; CAS no. 26008–54–8. That 

document included a summary of the 

petition prepared by the petitioner and 

solicited comments on the petitioner’s 

request. The Agency did not receive any 

comments. 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish an exemption 

from the requirement for a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and 

use in residential settings, but does not 

include occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue* * *’’ and specifies 

factors EPA is to consider in 

establishing an exemption. 

III. Risk Assessment and Statutory 

Findings 

EPA establishes exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance only in those 

cases where it can be shown that the 

risks from aggregate exposure to 

pesticide chemical residues under 

reasonably foreseeable circumstances 

will pose no appreciable risks to human 

health. In order to determine the risks 

from aggregate exposure to pesticide 

inert ingredients, the Agency considers 

the toxicity of the inert in conjunction 

with possible exposure to residues of 

the inert ingredient through food, 

drinking water, and through other 

exposures that occur as a result of 

pesticide use in residential settings. If 

EPA is able to determine that a finite 

tolerance is not necessary to ensure that 

there is a reasonable certainty that no 

harm will result from aggregate 

exposure to the inert ingredient, an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance may be established. 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 

available scientific data and other 

relevant information in support of this 

action and considered its validity, 

completeness and reliability and the 

relationship of this information to 

human risk. EPA has also considered 

available information concerning the 

variability of the sensitivities of major 

identifiable subgroups of consumers, 

including infants and children. In the 

case of certain chemical substances that 

are defined as polymers, the Agency has 

established a set of criteria to identify 

categories of polymers expected to 

present minimal or no risk. The 

definition of a polymer is given in 40 

CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion 

criteria for identifying these low-risk 

polymers are described in 40 CFR 

723.250(d). 2-Pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol conforms to the 

definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR 

723.250(b) and meets the following 

criteria that are used to identify low-risk 

polymers. 

1. The polymer is not a cationic 

polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated 

to become a cationic polymer in a 

natural aquatic environment. 

2. The polymer does contain as an 

integral part of its composition the 

atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and 

oxygen. 

3. The polymer does not contain as an 

integral part of its composition, except 

as impurities, any element other than 

those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii). 

4. The polymer is neither designed 

nor can it be reasonably anticipated to 

substantially degrade, decompose, or 

depolymerize. 

5. The polymer is manufactured or 

imported from monomers and/or 

reactants that are already included on 

the TSCA Chemical Substance 

Inventory or manufactured under an 

applicable TSCA section 5 exemption. 

6. The polymer is not a water 

absorbing polymer with a number 

average molecular weight (MW) greater 

than or equal to 10,000 daltons. 

Additionally, the polymer also meets 

as required the following exemption 

criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e). 

7. The polymer’s number average MW 

of 23,000 is greater than or equal to 

10,000 daltons. The polymer contains 

less than 2% oligomeric material below 

MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric 

material below MW 1,000. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 7277 

Thus, 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol meets the criteria 

for a polymer to be considered low risk 

under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on its 

conformance to the criteria in this unit, 

no mammalian toxicity is anticipated 

from dietary, inhalation, or dermal 

exposure to 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol. 

IV. Aggregate Exposures 

For the purposes of assessing 

potential exposure under this 

exemption, EPA considered that 2- 

pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer with 

ethenol could be present in all raw and 

processed agricultural commodities and 

drinking water, and that nonoccupational non-dietary exposure was 

possible. The number average MW of 2- 

pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer with 

ethenol is 23,000 daltons. Generally, a 

polymer of this size would be poorly 

absorbed through the intact 

gastrointestinal tract or through intact 

human skin. Since 2-pyrrolidone, 1- 

ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol 

conforms to the criteria that identify a 

low-risk polymer, there are no concerns 

for risks associated with any potential 

exposure scenarios that are reasonably 

foreseeable. The Agency has determined 

that a tolerance is not necessary to 

protect the public health. 

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances 

With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found 2-pyrrolidone, 1- 

ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol to share 

a common mechanism of toxicity with 

any other substances, and 2- 

pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer with 

ethenol does not appear to produce a 

toxic metabolite produced by other 

substances. For the purposes of this 

tolerance action, therefore, EPA has 

assumed that 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol does not have a 

common mechanism of toxicity with 

other substances. For information 

regarding EPA’s efforts to determine 

which chemicals have a common 

mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate 

the cumulative effects of such 

chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ 

cumulative. 

VI. Additional Safety Factor for the 

Protection of Infants and Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold margin of safety for 

infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the data base unless 

EPA concludes that a different margin of 

safety will be safe for infants and 

children. Due to the expected low 

toxicity of 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol, EPA has not used 

a safety factor analysis to assess the risk. 

For the same reasons the additional 

tenfold safety factor is unnecessary. 

VII. Determination of Safety 

Based on the conformance to the 

criteria used to identify a low-risk 

polymer, EPA concludes that there is a 

reasonable certainty of no harm to the 

U.S. population, including infants and 

children, from aggregate exposure to 

residues of 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, 

polymer with ethenol. 

VIII. Other Considerations 

A. Existing Exemptions From a 

Tolerance 

None. 

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

An analytical method is not required 

for enforcement purposes since the 

Agency is establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

without any numerical limitation. 

C. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established a MRL 

for 2-pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer 

with ethenol. 

IX. Conclusion 

Accordingly, EPA finds that 

exempting residues of 2-pyrrolidone, 1- 

ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol from the 

requirement of a tolerance will be safe. 

X. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes a tolerance 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these rules 

from review under Executive Order 

12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning 

and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993). Because this final rule has been 

exempted from review under Executive 

Order 12866, this final rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This final rule does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it involve 

any technical standards that would 

require Agency consideration of 

voluntary consensus standards pursuant 

to section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 

note). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers, 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes, or otherwise have any unique 

impacts on local governments. Thus, the 

Agency has determined that Executive 

Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
7278 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and 

Executive Order 13175, entitled 

‘‘Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this final rule. In addition, this final 

rule does not impose any enforceable 

duty or contain any unfunded mandate 

as described under Title II of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). 

Although this action does not require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994), EPA seeks to achieve 

environmental justice, the fair treatment 

and meaningful involvement of any 

group, including minority and/or lowincome populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. As such, to the 

extent that information is publicly 

available or was submitted in comments 

to EPA, the Agency considered whether 

groups or segments of the population, as 

a result of their location, cultural 

practices, or other factors, may have 

atypical or disproportionately high and 

adverse human health impacts or 

environmental effects from exposure to 

the pesticide discussed in this 

document, compared to the general 

population. 

XI. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 23, 2013. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.960, alphabetically add the 

following polymer to the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 

Polymer CAS No. 

* * * * * 

2-Pyrrolidone, 1-ethenyl-, polymer with ethenol, minimum 

number average molecular 

weight (in amu), 23,000 ........ 26008–54–8 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–02212 Filed 1–31–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 101 

[WT Docket No. 10–153; FCC 12–87] 

Facilitating the use of Microwave for 

Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and 

Providing Additional Flexibility to 

Broadcast Auxiliary Service and 

Operational Fixed Microwave 

Licensees 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission announces that the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved, for a period of three years, the 

information collection associated with 

the Commission’s Wireless Backhaul 

Second Report and Order (R&O), 

Facilitating the Use of Microwave for 

Wireless Backhaul and Other Uses and 

Providing Additional Flexibility to 

Broadcast Auxiliary Service and 

Operational Fixed Microwave 

Licensees. 

This notice is consistent with the 

R&O, which stated that the Commission 

would publish a document in the 

Federal Register announcing the 

effective date of the Rural Microwave 

Flexibility Policy. 

DATES: The Rural Microwave Flexibility 

Policy was adopted on August 3, 2012, 

in FCC 12–87, published in the Federal 

Register at 77 FR 54421, September 5, 

2012, and effective on January 7, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

J. Schauble, Deputy Chief, Broadband 

Division, Wireless Telecommunications 

Bureau at (202) 418–0797 or via the 

Internet at John.Schauble@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document announces that, on January 7, 

2013, OMB approved, for a period of 

three years, the information collection 

requirements contained in the 

Commission’s R&O, FCC 12–87, 

published at 77 FR 54421 (September 5, 

2012). The OMB Control Number is 

3060–0718. The Commission publishes 

this notice as an announcement of the 

effective date of the Rural Microwave 

Flexibility Policy. If you have any 

comments on the burden estimates 

listed below, or how the Commission 

can improve the collections and reduce 

any burdens caused thereby, please 

contact Judith B. Herman at (202) 418– 

0214 or via the Internet at JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov. 

Please include the OMB Control 

Number, 3060–0718, in your 

correspondence. The Commission will 

also accept your comments via email at 

PRA@fcc.gov. 

To request materials in accessible 

formats for people with disabilities 

(Braille, large print, electronic files, 

audio format), send an email to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer 

and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 

(202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). 

Synopsis 

As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), 

the FCC is notifying the public that it 

received OMB approval on January 7, 

2013, which contained new or modified 

information collection requirements for 

Fixed Service (FS) operators to comply 

with the Rural Microwave Flexibility 

Policy adopted in the Wireless Backhaul 

Second Report and Order, directing the 

Commission’s Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau to 

favorably consider waivers of the 

payload capacity requirements if FS 

applicants demonstrate compliance 

with certain criteria, and that the Rural 

Microwave Flexibility Policy would not 

be effective until approved by the Office 

of Management and Budget. The 

information collection was adopted in 

the Report and Order in WT Docket No. 

10–153 which appears at 77 FR 54421 

(September 5, 2012). The effective date 

of the rules adopted in that Report and 

Order was published as October 5, 2012, 

except for the Rural Microwave 

Flexibility Policy. Through this 

document, the Commission announces 

that it has received this approval (OMB 

Control No. 3060–0718, Expiration Date: 

January 31, 2016) and that the Rural 

Microwave Flexibility Policy became 

effective on January 7, 2013. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES