alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 16-049 August 19, 2016

Contact: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Makes Yucca Mountain Hearing Documents Publicly Available

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made nearly 3.7 million documents from the 

adjudicatory hearing on the proposed nuclear waste repository at Nevada’s Yucca Mountain publicly 

available in the agency’s online documents database.

The documents were formerly part of the Licensing Support Network (LSN) created to allow 

various parties and the public access to documents needed for the hearing on the Department of 

Energy’s request for a construction authorization for the repository. The NRC’s Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Boards had admitted nearly 300 contentions from various parties challenging aspects of 

DOE’s application. The LSN was shut down when the hearing was suspended in September 2011 after 

Congress reduced funding.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the NRC in August 

2013 to resume its review of the application using the remaining previously appropriated funds. In 

response, the staff completed the Safety Evaluation Report in January 2015 and a supplement to DOE’s 

Environmental Impact Statement in May 2016. The LSN documents were placed in the NRC’s online 

documents database, known as ADAMS, to comply with federal records requirements and assist the 

staff in completing the safety review. At that time, only LSN documents submitted by the staff were 

publicly available. However, the Commission directed that all LSN documents be made publicly 

available in ADAMS once the staff completed its license review activities.

The new LSN Library in ADAMS includes enhanced search capabilities as well as an online 

user’s guide. The NRC Public Document Room reference staff is also available to provide LSN Library 

assistance and can be reached at 301-415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., 

Eastern Time Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
#### § 201.32 When the Act applies.

The Act applies to adversary adjudications described in § 201.33 pending or commenced before the Commission on or after August 5, 1985. It also applies to any adversary adjudication commenced on or after October 1, 1984, and finally disposed of before August 5, 1985, provided that an application for fees and expenses, as described in these rules, has been filed with the Commission within 30 days after August 5, 1985. Proceedings which have been substantially concluded are not deemed pending under these rules although officially pending for purposes such as concluding remedial actions found in Commission orders or private undertakings.

[54 FR 53051, Dec. 27, 1989]
No. II-13-028 April 25, 2013

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING IN PADUCAH 

TO DISCUSS USEC GASEOUS DIFFUSION FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Paducah,

Ky., on May 2 to discuss results of the agency’s most recent review of regulatory performance at 

the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

The meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. in the meeting room of the McCracken County 

Library, 555 Washington St., Paducah. The meeting will be open to the public and the news 

media, and NRC staff members will be available to answer questions after the business portion 

of the meeting.

The NRC staff assessed USEC’s performance from Jan. 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2012, in the 

areas of safety operations, radiological controls, facility support and special topics. The NRC 

staff review determined that USEC continued to conduct its activities safely and securely, 

protecting public health and the environment.

The NRC found no areas needing improvement during the performance review period. 

Due to that performance level, NRC inspections at the facility during the next review period are 

being conducted at the normal level of inspection for this type of nuclear fuel facility, and no 

additional inspections are required.

“The NRC inspects nuclear fuel facilities such as USEC’s Paducah facility and monitors 

their performance on an ongoing basis,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We 

issue inspection reports and hold these meetings near each facility to discuss our oversight and 

answer any questions local residents may have.”

A copy of the review for the USEC facility in Paducah is available on the NRC website.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §15964. Clean coal centers of excellence

#### (a) In general

As part of the clean coal power initiative, the Secretary shall award competitive, merit-based grants to institutions of higher education for the establishment of centers of excellence for energy systems of the future.

#### (b) Basis for grants

The Secretary shall award grants under this section to institutions of higher education that show the greatest potential for advancing new clean coal technologies.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §404, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 753.)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Living with lupus.**
 
2014 |2018 | 2021
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3902:L 97/6/
Item Number:Link0508-T (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001101142
 
July 22, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Scientific and Technical Support 
for NIAID.
    Date: December 15, 2004.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Robert C. Goldman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of AIDS, NIH/NIAID/DAIDS/CCRB, Room 5226, 
6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7624, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meeting timing limitations imposed 
by the intramural research review cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26896 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §16611b. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 110–161, div. B, title III, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1919, related to NASA annual budget justification. See subsec. (c) of section 30103 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Estimates of Receipts and Collections and Proposed Use of Funds From Leases of Non-Excess Property

Pub. L. 111–8, div. B, title III, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 589, which provided in part that each annual budget request shall include an annual estimate of gross receipts and collections and proposed use of all funds collected pursuant to section 315 of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 ([former] 42 U.S.C. 2459j), was repealed and reenacted as subsec. (d) of section 30103 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314, §§3, 6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3328, 3444, which Act enacted Title 51.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Whitehall Improvement Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants-Respondents. [17 Battery Place, Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — -Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.409 Administrative appeals. ( a ) *Review of determination to open meeting.* Following any announcement stating that the Commission intends to open a meeting or a portion thereof, any person whose interests may be directly and substantially affected by the disposition of the matter to be discussed at such meeting may make a request, directed to the Commission's Secretary, that the meeting, or relevant portion thereof, be closed pursuant to § 200.402(a) (5), (6), or (7). The Secretary shall circulate such a request to the members of the Commission, along with a supporting statement provided by the requestor setting forth the requestor's interest in the matter and the reasons why the requestor believes that the meeting (or portion thereof) should be closed, and the Commission, upon the request of any one of its members, shall vote by recorded vote on whether to close such meeting or portion.
( b ) *Review of determination to close meeting.* Following any announcement that the Commission intends to close a meeting or a portion thereof, any person may make written or telegraphic request, directed to the Commission's Secretary, that the meeting or a portion thereof be open. Such a request shall set forth the requestor's interest in the matter and the reasons why the requestor believes that the meeting (or a portion thereof) should be open to the public. The Secretary shall circulate such a request and supporting statement to the members of the Commission, and the Commission, upon the request of any one of its members, shall vote whether to open such a meeting or a portion thereof.
#### § 323.4 Enforcement.

Any violation of this part shall be treated as a violation of a rule under section 18 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 57a, regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
### §16319. Energy and water supplies

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application to—

(1) address energy-related issues associated with provision of adequate water supplies, optimal management, and efficient use of water;

(2) address water-related issues associated with the provision of adequate supplies, optimal management, and efficient use of energy; and

(3) assess the effectiveness of existing programs within the Department and other Federal agencies to address these energy and water related issues.

#### (b) Program elements

The program under this section shall include—

(1) arsenic treatment;

(2) desalination; and

(3) planning, analysis, and modeling of energy and water supply and demand.

#### (c) Collaboration

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Interior, the Chief Engineer of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, and other Federal agencies as appropriate.

#### (d) Facilities

The Secretary may utilize all existing facilities within the Department and may design and construct additional facilities as needed to carry out the purposes of this program.

#### (e) Advisory committee

The Secretary shall establish or utilize an advisory committee to provide independent advice and review of the program.

#### (f) Reports

Not later than 2 years after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the assessment described in subsection (b) and recommendations for future actions.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §979, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 905.)
#### § 230.170 Prohibition of use of certain financial statements.

Financial statements which purport to give effect to the receipt and application of any part of the proceeds from the sale of securities for cash shall not be used unless such securities are to be offered through underwriters and the underwriting arrangements are such that the underwriters are or will be committed to take and pay for all of the securities, if any are taken, prior to or within a reasonable time after the commencement of the public offering, or if the securities are not so taken to refund to all subscribers the full amount of all subscription payments made for the securities. The caption of any such financial statement shall clearly set forth the assumptions upon which such statement is based. The caption shall be in type at least as large as that used generally in the body of the statement.

[21 FR 7566, Oct. 3, 1956]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41400 Conference Calendar

HERMAN PALMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE-INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION COMPANY DEPARTMENTS, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:00-CV-244

-------------------- October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Herman Palmer, Texas prisoner number 537392, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for lack of exhaustion. Despite ample opportunity to do so, Palmer has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. See Powe v. Ennis , 177 F.3d 393, 394 (5th Cir. 1999); Wendell v. Asher , 162 F.3d 887, 890-91 (5th Cir. 1998); Cooper v. Brookshire , 70 F.3d 377, 380 (5th Cir. 1995).No. 00-41400 -2- Palmer’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because this appeal lacks merit, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This dismissal of Palmer’s appeal as frivolous counts as a “strike” for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba
v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). We note that Palmer has at least one other “strike” against him. See Palmer
v. Jones , No. 00-40371 (5th Cir., Dec. 14, 2000). Palmer is warned that if he accumulates three “strikes” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he may not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Spore in Breast Cancer.
    Date: February 8-10, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m..
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington 1919 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20009.
    Contact Person: Shamala K. Srinivas, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8133, Bethesda, MD 20892; 
(301) 594-1224.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26895 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn application of artificial intelligence to automatic telescopesAutomatic Photoelectric Telescopes (APT's) allow an astronomer to be removed form the telescope site in both time and space. APT's 'execute' an observation program (a set of observation requests) expressed in an ASCII-based language (ATIS) and collect observation results expressed in this same language. The observation program is currently constructed by a Principal Astronomer from the requests of multiple users; the execution is currently controlled by a simple heuristic dispatch scheduler. Research aimed at improving the use of APT's is being carried out by the Entropy Reduction Engine (ERE) project at NASA Ames. The overall goal of the ERE project is the study and construction of systems that integrate planning, scheduling, and control. This paper discusses the application of some ERE technical results to the improvement of both the scheduling and the operation of APT's.Document ID19930006102Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsSwanson, Keith*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Drummond, Mark*(Sterling Software Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Bresina, John*(Sterling Software Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1992Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108115FIA-92-26NASA-TM-108115Accession Number93N15291Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006102.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 230.1001 Exemption for transactions exempt from qualification under § 25102(n) of the California Corporations Code. Preliminary Notes:
(1) Nothing in this section is intended to be or should be construed as in any way relieving issuers or persons acting on behalf of issuers from providing disclosure to prospective investors necessary to satisfy the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. This section only provides an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the Act”) [15 U.S.C. 77a *et seq.*]. (2) Nothing in this section obviates the need to comply with any applicable state law relating to the offer and sales of securities. (3) Attempted compliance with this section does not act as an exclusive election; the issuer also can claim the availability of any other applicable exemption. (4) This exemption is not available to any issuer for any transaction which, while in technical compliance with the provision of this section, is part of a plan or scheme to evade the registration provisions of the Act. In such cases, registration under the Act is required.
( a ) *Exemption.* Offers and sales of securities that satisfy the conditions of paragraph (n) of § 25102 of the California Corporations Code, and paragraph (b) of this section, shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 3(b) of that Act.
( b ) *Limitation on and computation of offering price.* The sum of all cash and other consideration to be received for the securities shall not exceed $5,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all other securities sold in the same offering of securities, whether pursuant to this or another exemption.
( c ) *Resale limitations.* Securities issued pursuant to this § 230.1001 are deemed to be “restricted securities” as defined in Securities Act Rule 144 [§ 230.144]. Resales of such securities must be made in compliance with the registration requirements of the Act or an exemption therefrom.
[61 FR 21359, May 9, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6002
LEROY BODIE, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. ROBERT SMITH, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00124-GCM) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. LeRoy Bodie, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: LeRoy Bodie, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bodie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED