alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
132 STAT. 4444 PUBLIC LAW 115–324—DEC. 17, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6330: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–939 (Comm. on Small Business). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Sept. 25, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–324 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify the method for prescribing size standards 

for business concerns. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO METHOD FOR PRESCRIBING SIZE STANDARDS FOR BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

Section 3(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

632(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II)) is amended by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting 

‘‘5 years’’. 

Approved December 17, 2018. 

15 USC 631 note. 

Small Business 

Runway 

Extension Act 

of 2018. 

Dec. 17, 2018 

[H.R. 6330] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
#### The Lord & Bushnell Company, Defendant in Error, v. W. J. Campbell, trading as W. J. Campbell Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,726.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.

Reversed and judgment here.

Opinion filed March 8, 1915.

*608Abstract of the Decision.

1. Set-off and bbcottpment, § *40*
      ***
      *—when evidence insufficient to establish.*Evidence examined and *held*insufficient to establish contract whereon claim of set-off based.

2. Contbacts, § *372*—when existence not affected by destruction of writing evidencing it.*The fact that the original writing evidencing the terms of an agreement entered into between the parties, which was signed and delivered, is destroyed does not destroy the agreement, but the terms of the agreement may be „ shown by introducing a copy.

Statement of the Case.

Action by The Lord & Bushnell Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against W. J. Campbell, trading as W. J. Campbell Lumber Company, defendant, to recover an unpaid balance claimed to be due for the purchase of certain lumber sold to defendant. The sale and delivery of the lumber at the price alleged was admitted by defendant, but he claimed to have had a contract with plaintiff for further lumber at the same price and that this contract was violated by plaintiff’s refusal to deliver the balance of the lumber, to the damage of defendant.

The agreement between the parties was created through letters between them which were introduced in evidence.

Plaintiff’s statement of claim also included an item for an allowance on lumber bought of defendant but rejected by plaintiff and an agreement by defendant to make such allowance was established.

To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $359.19, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

Morse Ives, for plaintiff in error.

Louis J. Behan, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.301 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart contains the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission implementing the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (Pub. L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a). These rules are applicable to all records in systems of records maintained by the Commission. They set forth the procedures by which individuals may make an inquiry regarding or request access to records about themselves, request an amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by the Commission.
( b ) This subpart also lists the Commission systems of records that are exempt from some of the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. These exemptions are authorized under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
FORM 13F COVER PAGE

Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: March 31, 2003

Check here if Amendment [   ]; Amendment Number:
This Amendment (Check only one.):  [   ] is a restatement.
                                   [   ] adds new holdings entries.

Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report:

Name:    Continental Casualty Company
Address: CNA Plaza
	 Chicago, Il 60685


13F File Number:  28-387

The institutional investment manager filing this report and the
person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person
signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all
information contained herein is true, correct, and complete, and
that it is understood that all required items, statements,
schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of
this form.


Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager:

Name:  Lynne Gugenheim
Title: Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Phone: (312) 822 4921
Signature, Place, and Date of Signing:
May 12,2003
Chicago, Illinois,
I AM SIGNING THIS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Report Type (Check only one.):

 [    ]              13F HOLDINGS REPORT.

 [  x ]              13F NOTICE.

 [    ]              13F COMBINATION REPORT.

List of Other Managers Reporting for this Manager:

The securities on which Continental Casualty Company exercises
shared investment discretion have been reported upon by CNA
Financial Corporation on behalf of Continental Casualty Company.
<Page>
t{B1*0)fffitl_fJ\~fj -:J tc 6 ... 

?~-::> FEMA 529J 2014fF9,.Ej 

!iQ00 tL: fJ'fJ'tio 

HWCm-~h-¥CflL', *IL*tc~~T-7'J vO)~t<= 't('Go 

*IL*tc ~~ T-7'1 vb'~O)...ti<= cC'*G~?,*ILb'T-7'1 vO)Mn i<= ?fJ'~~o
#### § 201.300 Hearings.

Hearings for the purpose of taking evidence shall be held only upon order of the Commission. All hearings shall be conducted in a fair, impartial, expeditious and orderly manner.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-19328; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-57]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Nebraska City, NE.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 26, 2004 (69 FR 62403). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 26, 2004.

Elizabeth S. Wallis,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-26848  Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 4910-13-M                      ( print page 70542)
### §16921. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16921 was editorially reclassified as section 20923 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ACORD Corporation (“ACORD”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ACORD Corporation, Pearl River, NY. The nature and scope of ACORD's standards development activities are: To improve efficiency in insurance and reinsurance transactions by: (1) Providing a common framework for the interchange of information; (2) speeding up communication of data; (3) reducing processing costs and paperwork; and (4) improving accuracy and facilitating e-commerce.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26206 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Frida Shalamayeva, Appellant, v Park 83rd Street Corp., Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 607]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, (LeVine, J.), dated April 13, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell over a height differential of approximately 13⁄4 inches between the concrete walkway and a raised platform area abutting the entrance of *388the defendant’s building. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that it was dark outside and that the area was not properly illuminated at the time of the accident.

Whether a dangerous condition exists on real property so as to create liability on the part of the landowner depends on the particular circumstances of each case and is generally a question of fact for the jury *(see Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976 [1997]). Here, the defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that the difference in elevation between the concrete walkway and the platform was trivial and nonactionable as a matter of law *(see Fasano v Green-Wood Cemetery,*21 AD3d 446 [2005]). Moreover, the evidence tendered by the defendant failed to address the plaintiff’s allegations that inadequate lighting was a proximate cause of the accident *(see Miner v Northport Yacht Club,*15 AD3d 362 [2005]; *Scher v Stropoli,*7 AD3d 777 [2004]; *Swerdlow v WSK Props. Corp.,*5 AD3d 587, 588 [2004]). Inasmuch as the defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact, and the sufficiency of the plaintiffs papers need not be considered *(see Ayotte v Gervasio,*81 NY2d 1062 [1993]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.E, Skelos, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### §14701. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 105–303, §2, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2843, related to definitions. See section 50101 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11413

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUSTAVO GALINDO RAMIREZ, also known as Tavo

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CR-47-3

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gustavo Galindo Ramirez

(Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Ramirez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
No. 01-11413

-2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
# Subpart 3403.1—Safeguards

**Parent topic:**PART 3403—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

## 3403.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

(d)(2)(ii)(B) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 3.104–7(d)(2)(ii)(B).
552.301-2 Matrix Notes.       **Matrix Notes:**          1. The clauses and provisions prescribed for Federal Supply Schedule or Acquisitions for GSA Stock Program contracts do not have other types of contracts indicated. Those clauses and provisions may appear specifically in certain types of contracts within the Federal Supply Schedule or Acquisitions for GSA Stock Program contracts.    **Parent topic:** 552.301 Matrix of Provisions and Clauses.
### §14406. Clarification with respect to advance directives

Subject to section 14402(b) of this title (relating to construction and treatment of certain services), sections 1395cc(f) and 1396a(w) of this title shall not be construed—

(1) to require any provider or organization, or any employee of such a provider or organization, to inform or counsel any individual regarding any right to obtain an item or service furnished for the purpose of causing, or the purpose of assisting in causing, the death of the individual, such as by assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing; or

(2) to apply to or to affect any requirement with respect to a portion of an advance directive that directs the purposeful causing of, or the purposeful assisting in causing, the death of any individual, such as by assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing.

(Pub. L. 105–12, §7, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 26.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Cole, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert L. Cole                         May 16, 2005
----------------------------------         ------------
Robert L. Cole                             Date
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 229.510 (Item 510) Disclosure of Commission position on indemnification for Securities Act liabilities.

In addition to the disclosure prescribed by Item 702 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.702), if the undertaking required by paragraph (h) of Item 512 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.512) is not required to be included in the registration statement because acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement is not being requested, and if waivers have not been obtained comparable to those specified in paragraph (h), a brief description of the indemnification provisions relating to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant against liability arising under the Securities Act (including any provision of the underwriting agreement which relates to indemnification of the underwriter or its controlling persons by the registrant against such liabilities where a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant is such an underwriter or controlling person thereof or a member of any firm which is such an underwriter) shall be included in the prospectus, together with a statement in substantially the following form:

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.

[47 FR 11401, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 56 FR 48103, Sept. 24, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report'), Joni K. Troska, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Joni K. Troska
                                               -------------------
                                               Joni K. Troska,
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Dated: 8/13/04
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3853 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA mortgage insurance 

program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during 

periods that the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet minimum capital ratio requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA 

mortgage insurance program of the Secretary of Housing 

and Urban Development during periods that the Mutual 

Mortgage Insurance Fund does not meet minimum capital ratio requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Enhanced Over5 sight Act of 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3853 IH

1 SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL ACTUARIAL STUDIES OF MMIF DUR2 ING PERIODS OF CAPITAL DEPLETION. 

3 Paragraph (4) of section 202(a) of the National 

4 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)(4)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘except as 

6 provided in subparagraph (B),’’ after ‘‘to be con7 ducted annually,’’; 

8 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘, ex9 cept as provided in subparagraph (B),’’ after ‘‘annu10 ally’’; 

11 (3) by striking the paragraph designation and 

12 heading and all that follows through ‘‘The Secretary 

13 shall provide’’ and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(4) INDEPENDENT ACTUARIAL STUDY.— 

15 ‘‘(A) ANNUAL STUDY.—The Secretary 

16 shall provide’’; and 

17 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(B) SEMIANNUAL STUDIES DURING PERI20 ODS OF CAPITAL DEPLETION.—During any pe21 riod that the Fund fails to maintain sufficient 

22 capital to comply with the capital ratio require23 ment under section 205(f)(2)— 

24 ‘‘(i) the independent study required by 

25 subparagraph (A) shall be conducted semi26 annually and shall analyze the financial poVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:35 Feb 01, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3853.IH H3853

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3853 IH

1 sition of the Fund as of September 30 and 

2 March 31 of each fiscal year during such 

3 period; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) the Secretary shall submit a re5 port meeting the requirements of subpara6 graph (A) for each such semiannual 

7 study.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.15a-5 Exemption of certain nonbank lenders.

A lender approved under the rules and regulations of the Small Business Administration shall be exempt from the registration requirement of section 15(a) (1) of the Act if it does not engage in the business of effecting transactions in securities or of buying and selling securities for its own account except in respect of receiving notes evidencing loans to small business concerns and selling the portion of such notes guaranteed by the Small Business Administration through or to a registered broker or dealer or to a bank, a savings institution, an insurance company, or an account over which an investment adviser registered pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 exercises investment discretion.

[41 FR 50645, Nov. 17, 1976]
### Part B—Native Hawaiian Program