alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Fair Value (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Sep. 30, 2023 | Dec. 31, 2022 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]**                        |          |          |
| Other invested assets overseas deposit                       | $ 63          | $ 72          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Overseas deposits are excluded from the fair value hierarchy because their fair value is recorded using the net asset value per share (or equivalent) practical experiment, which can be redeemed at net asset value in 90 days or less.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cna_OtherInvestedAssetsOverseasDeposit**Namespace Prefix:**cna_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Across America Real Estate
Corporation, for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Across America Real Estate Corporation,.
 Dated November 13, 2006
    /s/ Ann L. SchmittAnn L. Schmitt,President, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3865 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3865

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the American 
                        Opportunity Tax Credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2012

Mr. Braley of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the American 
                        Opportunity Tax Credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``College Tax Cut Extension Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 25A of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``in 2009, 2010, 2011, or 
2012'' and inserting ``after 2008 and before 2017''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after 2012.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13n-8 Reports to be provided to the Commission.

Every security-based swap data repository shall promptly report to the Commission, in a form and manner acceptable to the Commission, such information as the Commission determines to be necessary or appropriate for the Commission to perform the duties of the Commission under the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

[80 FR 14550, Mar. 19, 2015]
#### A & A Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Aloha Shaw, Respondent.

Determination, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.; Breitel, J., dissents and votes to modify on the authority of *Barrow Realty Gorp.*V. *Village Brewery Restaurant*(272 App. Div. 262) and on the ground that there is no basis for distinction between residential statutory tenants as compared with business statutory tenants, or between the statutes applicable to them.
#### Jana L., Appellant, v West 129th Street Realty Co. LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants. West 129th Street Realty Co. LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v 408-412 West 129th Street Associates LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 230]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered on or about December 8, 2005, which denied *261plaintiffs motion to require that defendant West 129th Street Realty Co. and its indemnitor, 408-412 West 129th Street Associates, be jointly represented at trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given the circumstances of this personal injury arising from an assault by an intruder in an apartment building, where the sale of the building closed 90 minutes later and plaintiff sued, among others, both the seller and the purchaser, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in permitting both entities to continue to be represented by separate counsel of their choice at trial despite both the dismissal of the complaint against the purchaser on its motion for summary judgment and this Court’s prior ruling (22 AD3d 274 [2005]) granting the seller summary judgment on its cross claim for contractual indemnification against the purchaser, which determination is still subject to possible further review upon entry of a final judgment after trial. Indeed, if the trial court had granted plaintiffs motion, to which the seller did not object, the purchaser effectively would have been deprived of its right to conflict-free counsel of its choice *(cf. Chemprene, Inc. v X-Tyal Intl. Corp.,*55 NY2d 900 [1982], *modfg, on partial dissent of Lazer, J.,*78 AD2d 668 [1980]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Williams, McGuire, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4006 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4006

    To require the submission of a plan to ensure the placement of 
 sufficient U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers at each of the 
ten international airports in the United States with the largest volume 
 of international travelers to effectively combat security threats and 
                vulnerabilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2012

   Ms. Hahn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the submission of a plan to ensure the placement of 
 sufficient U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers at each of the 
ten international airports in the United States with the largest volume 
 of international travelers to effectively combat security threats and 
                vulnerabilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLAN TO ENSURE AIRPORT SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting 
through U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall submit to the 
Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a 
comprehensive plan for ensuring the placement of sufficient U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection officers at each of the ten international 
airports in the United States with the largest volume of international 
travelers.
    (b) Elements.--The plan required under subsection (a) shall include 
the following:
            (1) An assessment of existing personnel employed at the 
        airports identified in such plan.
            (2) An assessment of the existing security threats and 
        vulnerabilities of such airports.
            (3) An estimate of the personnel needs for each such 
        airport that is required in order to effectively combat such 
        security threats and vulnerabilities.
            (4) An assessment of how increases in international travel 
        may impact current U.S. Customs and Border Protection security 
        functions.
            (5) An identification of any obstacles that may impede such 
        a plan from being fully implemented.
            (6) A detailed estimate of all costs associated with the 
        implementation of such a plan.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20

- 0232

JAMES DAVID SIMPSON

,

Petitioner /Appellant

,

vs.

MUSSELSHELL COUNTY BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS

,

Respondent /Appellee

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING
FOURTH EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE
OPENING BRIEF

Appellant/Petitioner James David Simpson has moved the Court, pursuant to

M.R.App.P

. 26( 2), for an extension from September 18 , 20 20, up to an including

October 16 , 2020, in which to file his opening brief in this matter. It is supported
by affidavit of counsel. Appellee/Respondent Musselshell County Board of
Commissioners does not oppose the motion.
Pursuant to the authority granted under M.R.App.P. 26(2), and good cause
having been shown, Appellant, James David Simpson, is given an extension of

ti me up to and including October 16 , 2020, to file his opening brief.

DATED this

_____ day of September

, 2020

____________________________________ Montana Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2020

09/11/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0232
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1660 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103·2029

The Honorable Robert M. Summers, Secretary Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Secretary Summers: 

### OCT 06

## 2014

On: July 28, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department ofthe Environment pertaining to amendments to the Maryland Clean Car regulations .to incorporate California's Low Emission Vehicle III program. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Brian Rehn, Office ofAir Program Planning, at (215) 814-2176, or at rehn.brian@epa.gov. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

# ~~ Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

cc: George (Tad) Abum, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning

() Printed on 100% recycledlrecyc/ablepaper with /00%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
### §1490p–1. Office of Rural Housing Preservation

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Farmers Home Administration an Office of Rental Housing Preservation (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Office"). The Office shall be headed by a Director designated by the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of the Office are:

(1) to review and process applications under section 1472(c) of this title and section 1485(t) of this title related to the preservation of rural rental housing;

(2) to provide technical or financial assistance to any other projects needing such assistance;

(3) to coordinate and direct all other activities related to the preservation of rural housing; and

(4) to monitor compliance of projects prepaid or receiving incentives under the Housing Act of 1949.

(July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title V, §537, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title VII, §712(c), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3841.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Housing Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (b)(4), is act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, 63 Stat. 413, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1441 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1441 of this title and Tables.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Cummins

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on July 12, 2011 between Cummins and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

Cummins: Brian Mormino, Yang Chen, Mike Ruth, Jackie Yeager, Morgan Andreae, 

Gary Salemme, Jim Nebergall, Bill Martin, Mike Cooper, Jeff Lewis, Jackie Yeager

EPA: Don Kopinski, Chuck Moulis, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on regulatory language for ABT, Df, fuel property 

measurement, drift validation for gases, and loose engine provisions.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-17-0027 :  Proposed Rulemaking: Fitness-for-Duty Drug Testing Requirements (RIN 3150-AI67)

Accession Number: ML16123A004

Date Released: Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16123A005 - SECY-17-0027:  Proposed Rulemaking: Fitness-for-Duty Drug Testing Requirements (RIN 3150-AI67) (11 page(s), 2/22/2017)
    - ML16123A007 - SECY-17-0027:  Enclosure 1 - FRN - Proposed Rule:  Revisions to Fitness for Duty Drug Testing Program Requirements (132 page(s), 2/22/2017)
    - ML16123A006 - SECY-17-0027:  Enclosure 2 - Proposed Rule - Draft Regulatory Analysis and Backfit Analysis for Fitness for Duty Testing Requirements (12 page(s), 2/22/2017)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T17:39:26-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00329-CR

Brandon Robisheaux, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2012-042, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due November 24, 2014. On counsel’s motions, the

time for filing was extended to April 3, 2015. On May 8, the Court ordered appellant’s counsel,

Susan Schoon, to file a brief on appellant’s behalf no later than June 5. Counsel did not file a brief

as ordered.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and if so, whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If

necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this

cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of
the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental

record no later than July 17, 2015.

It is ordered on June 17, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 17, 2015

Do Not Publish

2
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

September 9, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M160909 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 2:45 P.M., 

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-16-0086 – CB&I AREVA MOX SERVICES, LLC (MIXED OXIDE FUEL 

FABRICATION FACILITY POSSESSION AND USE LICENSE), INTERVENORS’ 

MOTION TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

The Commission1 approved a Memorandum and Order addressing the unopposed motion of the 

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League and Nuclear Watch South to amend the Protective 

Order and related Nondisclosure Declaration issued in this now-closed proceeding. The 

Memorandum and Order amends the Protective Order and provides additional direction. 

(Subsequently, on September 9, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR 

 

 1 Chairman Burns abstained in this matter but was present at the meeting for the purpose 

of establishing a quorum required for Commission action.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### §§ 240.15a-7-240.15a-9 [Reserved]
### §§141 to 148. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313, 58 Stat. 714

Section 141, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §1, 32 Stat. 728, provided for regulation of sale of and interstate traffic of viruses, serums, toxins, antitoxins, etc. See section 262 of this title.

Section 142, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §2, 32 Stat. 729, related to falsely labeling or marking container or package. See section 262 of this title.

Section 143, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §3, 32 Stat. 729, provided for inspection of manufacturing establishments. See section 262 of this title.

Section 144, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §4, 32 Stat. 729, provided for inspection of foreign manufacturing establishments. See section 262 of this title.

Section 145, acts July 1, 1902, ch. 1370, §1, 32 Stat. 712; July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §4, 32 Stat. 729; Aug. 14, 1912, ch. 288, 37 Stat. 309, provided for issuing of licenses to manufacturing establishments. See section 262 of this title.

Section 146, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §5, 32 Stat. 729, provided for enforcement of regulations. See section 262 of this title.

Section 147, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §6, 32 Stat. 729, provided against interfering with officers. See section 262 of this title.

Section 148, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1378, §7, 32 Stat. 729, related to penalties for offenses. See section 262 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Renumbering and Repeal of Repealing Act

Title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, of act July 1, 1944, which repealed these sections, was renumbered title VII, §711, by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; §713, by act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; title VIII, §813, by act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; title IX, §913, by Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; title X, §1013, by Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; title XI, §1113, by Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; title XII, §1213, by Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; title XIII, §1313, by Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and was repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936.
(December 19, 1951.)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Sidney Burger for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of New Jersey.)

Present— Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MacCrate, JJ.
### §1862o–5. Meeting critical national science needs

#### (a) In general

In addition to any other criteria, the Director shall include consideration of the degree to which awards and research activities that otherwise qualify for support by the Foundation may assist in meeting critical national needs in innovation, competitiveness, safety and security, the physical and natural sciences, technology, engineering, social sciences, and mathematics.

#### (b) Priority treatment

The Director shall give priority in the selection of awards and the allocation of Foundation resources to proposed research activities, and grants funded under the Foundation's Research and Related Activities Account, that can be expected to make contributions in physical or natural science, technology, engineering, social sciences, or mathematics, or that enhance competitiveness, innovation, or safety and security in the United States.

#### (c) Limitation

Nothing in this section shall be construed to restrict or bias the grant selection process against funding other areas of research deemed by the Foundation to be consistent with its mandate nor to change the core mission of the Foundation.

(Pub. L. 110–69, title VII, §7018, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Act, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 7001 of Pub. L. 110–69, set out as a note under section 1862o of this title.