alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, James D. Kruger, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nelnet
Education Loan Funding, Inc. (the "Company");

        2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

        4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

             (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by
others, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being
prepared;

             (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

             (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

        5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

             (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

             (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


    Date:  May 17, 2004                 /S/ JAMES D. KRUGER
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        James D. Kruger
                                        Secretary and Treasurer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
February 24, 2016 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the January 2016 monthly status report 

on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated carryover 

funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC activities in 

January 2016 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit in the case In re Aiken County regarding the licensing process for the U.S. Department of 

Energy’s Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Ed Whitfield 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
[Civil No. 314.]

#### CHARLES YATES, Appellant, v. MARY B. BURTON, Appellee.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. James H. Wright, Judge.

L. F. Eggerd, for Appellee.

June 3, 1890.

Affirmed.
No. I-14-021 April 29, 2014 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Issues Order Prohibiting Former Indian Point Manager

From Participating in Licensed Activities For One Year

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is issuing an order barring a former chemistry manager at 

the Indian Point nuclear power plant from taking part in NRC-licensed activities for one year. The 

enforcement action against Daniel Wilson is based on his deliberate fabrication of testing information 

for fuel oil intended for use in the plant’s emergency diesel generators.

The NRC is also issuing a Severity Level III Notice of Violation to Entergy, which owns and 

operates Indian Point, located in Buchanan (Westchester County), N.Y. In the notice, the NRC 

identifies two violations by the company, including 1) operating Unit 2 and 3 without being in 

compliance with technical specifications for the fuel oil; and 2) the failure of its former chemistry 

manager to initiate a condition report, or otherwise notify the plant’s operations department, such that 

Entergy could promptly inform the NRC of the condition.

“Because Entergy independently identified this issue and has taken timely and comprehensive 

corrective actions, the NRC is not issuing a civil penalty to the company over this matter,” NRC Region 

I Administrator Bill Dean said. “However, the enforcement action against Daniel Wilson and the 

Notice of Violation issued to the company underscore the need for all nuclear power plant employees to 

act in a manner consistent with their obligation to fully and faithfully perform their duties at all times.”

The NRC’s enforcement action against Wilson took into consideration that he was prosecuted 

by the U.S. Department of Justice, convicted of a felony, sentenced to 18 months of probation and fined 

$500. He was sentenced in January.

The sentence was based on an investigation by the NRC Office of Investigations that found that 

Wilson deliberately failed in February 2012 to check on the amount of particulate matter in the 

emergency generator diesel fuel. Further, he then created records indicating he had conducted the tests 

and that fuel met NRC requirements. (The emergency diesel generators serve an important safety 

function at nuclear power plants as they are used to power safety systems in the event that the power 

from the grid is interrupted.)

Despite the negligence, subsequent NRC reviews determined the generators still would have 

been able to perform their function due to the conservative nature of the particulate matter limits and 

because of filters used to purify the fuel.

Wilson would have to notify the NRC prior to seeking employment involving activities licensed 

by the agency.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as amended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

This 18th day of May, 2004.


/s/ David J. Lance
-----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
North Georgia Community Financial Partners, Inc.


/s/ Rhonda C. Massengill
-----------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
North Georgia Community Financial Partners, Inc.


<PAGE>
NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 45654 10/5/90 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record Site 

Index for the Removal Action 

at the Torch Lake Superfund 

Site (Documents contained 

on this index are incorporated 

by reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

1

2 45661 etc. 4/29/92 - 

12/29/08

U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the 

Remedial Action at the Torch 

Lake Superfund Site 

(Documents contained on the 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

28

3 205374, 

238553

5/3/04 - 

7/21/05

U.S. EPA File Administrative Record Site 

Index for the Removal Action 

at the Torch Lake Operable 

Unit 3: Quincy Smelter Site 

(Documents contained on this 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

2

4 428471 6/10/13 Wyant, D., 

MDEQ

Karl, R., U.S. 

EPA

Letter re: State of Michigan 

Concurrence with the 

Proposed Deletion of Torch 

Lake Superfund Site, 

Operable Unit 3, Quincy 

Smelter and Calumet Lake

2

Torch Lake Superfund Site

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Remedial Action

Deletion Docket

For

Operable Unit 3: Quincy Smelter and Calumet Lake

June XX, 2013

SEMS ID: 

Houghton County, Michigan
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3835 

AN ACT 

To extend the pay limitation for Members of Congress and 

Federal employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3835 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PAY LIMITATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 147 of the Continuing 

3 Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 111–242; 5 U.S.C. 

4 5303 note), as added by section 1(a) of the Continuing 

5 Appropriations and Surface Transportation Extensions 

6 Act, 2011 (Public Law 111–322; 124 Stat. 3518), is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘December 

9 31, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘December 31, 

11 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’. 

12 (b) APPLICATION TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH.— 

13 (1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.—The extension of 

14 the pay limit for Federal employees through Decem15 ber 31, 2013, as established pursuant to the amend16 ments made by subsection (a), shall apply to Mem17 bers of Congress in accordance with section 601(a) 

18 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 

19 U.S.C. 31). 

20 (2) OTHER LEGISLATIVE BRANCH EMPLOY21 EES.— 

22 (A) LIMIT IN PAY.—Notwithstanding any 

23 other provision of law, no cost of living adjust24 ment required by statute with respect to a legis25 lative branch employee which (but for this sub26 paragraph) would otherwise take effect during 
3 

•HR 3835 EH

1 the period beginning on the date of enactment 

2 of this Act and ending on December 31, 2013, 

3 shall be made. 

4 (B) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the 

5 term ‘‘legislative branch employee’’ means— 

6 (i) an employee of the Federal Gov7 ernment whose pay is disbursed by the 

8 Secretary of the Senate or the Chief Ad9 ministrative Officer of the House of Rep10 resentatives; and 

11 (ii) an employee of any office of the 

12 legislative branch who is not described in 

13 clause (i). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3835 

AN ACT 

To extend the pay limitation for Members of 

Congress and Federal employees.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
#### N. V. *“*Oxyde", Maatschappij Voor Ertsen en Metalen, Respondent, v. National Surety Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §10191. Purpose

It is the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) to provide direction to the Secretary with respect to the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel;

(2) to authorize the Secretary, pursuant to this subchapter—

(A) to provide for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a deep geologic test and evaluation facility; and

(B) to provide for a focused and integrated high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel research and development program, including the development of a test and evaluation facility to carry out research and provide an integrated demonstration of the technology for deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste, and the development of the facilities to demonstrate dry storage of spent nuclear fuel; and

(3) to provide for an improved cooperative role between the Federal Government and States, affected Indian tribes, and units of general local government in the siting of a test and evaluation facility.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title II, §211, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2245.)
§ 660.3 Reasonable policies and procedures concerning the accuracy and integrity of furnished information. ( a ) *Policies and procedures.* Each furnisher must establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information relating to consumers that it furnishes to a consumer reporting agency. The policies and procedures must be appropriate to the nature, size, complexity, and scope of each furnisher's activities.
( b ) *Guidelines.* Each furnisher must consider the guidelines in Appendix A of this part in developing its policies and procedures required by this section, and incorporate those guidelines that are appropriate.
( c ) *Reviewing and updating policies and procedures.* Each furnisher must review its policies and procedures required by this section periodically and update them as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3820 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the dependent 

care credit to take into account expenses for care of parents and grandparents who do not live with the taxpayer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2012 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. TOWNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the dependent care credit to take into account expenses 

for care of parents and grandparents who do not live 

with the taxpayer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elder Care Tax Credit 

5 Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3820 IH

1 (1) More than 10 million people in the United 

2 States already have long-term care needs. Studies 

3 estimate that unpaid family members deliver an even 

4 larger share of the care, and the cost of nursing 

5 home care averages $72,000 a year. 

6 (2) The proportion of adult children providing 

7 personal care or financial assistance to a parent has 

8 more than tripled during the past 15 years. 

9 (3) Researchers estimate that families furnish 

10 the majority of care to people with disabilities. Sev11 enty-two percent of older adults with disabilities re12 ceive help with basic personal activities or household 

13 chores exclusively from family caregivers. 

14 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT FOR EXPENSES FOR 

15 HOUSEHOLD AND DEPENDENT CARE SERV16 ICES NECESSARY FOR GAINFUL EMPLOY17 MENT. 

18 (a) CREDIT ALLOWED FOR COSTS INCURRED TO

19 CARE FOR PARENTS AND GRANDPARENTS WHO DO NOT

20 LIVE WITH THE TAXPAYER.— 

21 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

22 21(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

23 amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara24 graph (B), by striking the period at the end of subVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:55 Jan 25, 2012 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3820.IH H3820

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3820 IH

1 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding 

2 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(D) a dependent of the taxpayer (as de4 fined in section 152, determined without regard 

5 to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), (d)(1)(B), and 

6 (d)(1)(C)) who is the father or mother of the 

7 taxpayer (or an ancestor of such father or 

8 mother) and who is physically or mentally in9 capable of caring for himself or herself.’’. 

10 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph 

11 (B) of section 21(b)(1) of such Code is amended by 

12 inserting ‘‘(other than a dependent described in sub13 paragraph (D))’’ after ‘‘and (d)(1)(B))’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1The Honorable John D. Kelly passed away on October 21, 1998. This opinion

is consistent with his vote at the en banc conference following oral argument on

September 23, 1998.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3598

___________

Mufid Al-Din, also known as *

Charles A. Parker, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri

Michael Bowersox, et al., *

*

Appellants. *

___________

Submitted: September 23, 1998

Filed: April 13, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG,

WOLLMAN, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

MURPHY and KELLY,1 Circuit Judges, En Banc.

___________

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
2The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

-2-

Respondent Michael Bowersox appeals from an order entered in the United

States District Court2 for the Western District of Missouri denying his motion to

dismiss Mufid Al-Din’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Parker v. Bowersox, No. 97-657-CV-W-6-P (W. D. Mo.

Sept. 2, 1997) (order denying respondent’s motion to dismiss and granting

respondent’s motion for an interlocutory appeal). Jurisdiction in the district court was

based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2254. Jurisdiction in this court is based upon 28

U.S.C. § 1292(b). In an earlier proceeding, a divided panel of this court affirmed.

We subsequently vacated the panel opinion and granted respondent’s suggestion for

rehearing en banc. Now, in accordance with our en banc opinion filed on this date

in the consolidated cases under the title Nichols v. Bowersox, Nos. 97-3639 & 97-

3640 (8th Cir. Apr. 13, 1999) (en banc), we affirm the order of the district court

denying respondent’s motion to dismiss. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

BEAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons I advance in Nichols v. Bowersox, No. 97-

3639 and Crane v. Dormire, No. 97-3640. Accordingly, I would either dismiss this

case or remand it to the district court with directions to grant appellants' motion to

dismiss.

 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
###### Editorial Note on Part 140

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 140 appear at 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024.

#### § 140.735-7 Statutory violations applicable to conduct of Commission members and employees.

A violation of section 2(a)(7), 8 or 9 (c) or (d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, shall be deemed to be a violation of this subpart as well.

[58 FR 52660, Oct. 12, 1993]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-2345.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Sept. 14, 2007.

Decided Sept. 24, 2007.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Nov. 26, 2007.

*363Edmond E. Chang, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Mustafa E. Derkunt, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, Hon. TERRENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge and Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This case is unbelievably frivolous. We AFFIRM.
3430.201-5 Waiver.       (a) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the head of the agency for the purposes of FAR 30.201–5(a) and (b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3430.201—CAS Program Requirements