alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Denis McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Denis McCarthy                               
|                        |  |  |  | Denis McCarthy                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer of Catcher Holdings, Inc.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey President and Chief Executive
OfficerMay 7, 2008 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
§ 148.26 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency, or on his or her own initiative, the Presiding Officer may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible. Whether or not the position of the Commission was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, which is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought. No discovery and/or evidentiary proceedings shall be permitted into the question of whether the agency's position was substantially justified.
( b ) A request that the Presiding Officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
[46 FR 57671, Nov. 25, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 18881, May 23, 1986]
Sep 30 2010

Mr. Jim Stephenson

CEO/President Aero Sports Connection, Inc.

PO Box 589 Marshall, MI 49068

Dear Mr. Stephenson:

This is in response to your March 27, 2009 letter (public docket No. FAA-2009-0340) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (F AA) on behalf of Aero Sports Connection, Inc. (ASC), for an exemption from § 91.319 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. That exemption, if granted, would allow ASC to provide flight training operations in experimental aircraft for compensation or hire.

Section 91.319(h) permits for-hire flight training in experimental aircraft in accordance with a Letter of Deviation Authority (LODA). The FAA guidance for the issuance of the required LODA was published on September 15, 2010. Pleas e contact your local Flight Standards District Office to submit a LODA request.

Because the relief you seek is covered under the rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.82 Public availability of materials filed pursuant to § 240.14a-8(d) and related materials.

Materials filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 14a-8(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.14a-8(d)), written communications related thereto received from any person, and each related no-action letter or other written communication issued by the staff of the Commission, shall be made available to any person upon request for inspection or copying.

[37 FR 20558, Sept. 30, 1972]
5348.104-3 Sharing Collateral Savings       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5348.1 — POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 392 

For the relief of Geert Botzen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2011 

Ms. LEE of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Geert Botzen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GEERT 

4 BOTZEN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Geert Botzen shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 392 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Geert Botzen en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), and is not inadmissible under paragraph 

4 (2) or (3) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act, he shall be considered to have entered and 

6 remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of 

7 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation8 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

10 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap11 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica12 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

13 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Geert Botzen, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

18 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi19 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun20 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi21 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

22 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na23 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

24 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
STYLE:

v. FILECOPY 

### RE: Case No. 15-0105 DATE: 5/22/2015 COA #: 12-14-00217-CV TC#: 2013-0254-P-l BARBARA GAIL HARRIS HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD, DECEASED, AND TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF HAYDEN R. MAYFIELD 

### Todaythe Supreme Court of Texas deniedthemotion for rehearing of the above-referencedpetition for review. MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF ARPEAin 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354~ TYLER, TX 75702
Subpart 3409.4—Debarment, Suspension,

and Ineligibility

Parent topic: PART 3409—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

3409.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements FAR subpart 9.4 by detailing policies and procedures governing the

debarment and suspension of organizations and individuals from participating in ED contracts and

subcontracts.

3409.401 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all procurement debarment and suspension actions initiated by ED. This

subpart does not apply to nonprocurement debarment and suspension.

3409.403 Definitions.

The SPE is designated as the debarring official and suspending official as defined in FAR 9.403 and

is designated as the agency official authorized to make the decisions required in FAR 9.406 and

9.407.

3409.406 Debarment.

3409.406-3 Procedures.

(b) Decisionmaking process.

(1) Contractors proposed for debarment may submit, in person, in writing, or through a

representative, information and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment. The contractor

must submit additional information within 30 days of receipt of the notice of proposal to debar, as

described in FAR 9.406–3(c).

(2) In actions not based upon a conviction or civil judgment, if the contractor's submission in

opposition raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed debarment, the contractor

may request a fact-finding conference. If the Debarring Official determines that there is a genuine

dispute of material fact, the Debarring Official will conduct fact-finding and base the decision in

accordance with FAR 9.406–3(b)(2) and (d) through (f).
3409.407 Suspension.

3409.407-3 Procedures.

(b) Decisionmaking process.

(1) Contractors suspended in accordance with FAR 9.407 may submit, in person, in writing, or

through a representative, information and argument in opposition to the suspension. The contractor

must submit this information and argument within 30 days of receipt of the notice of suspension, as

described in FAR 9.407–3(c).

(2) In actions not based upon an indictment, if the contractor's submission in opposition raises a

genuine dispute over facts material to the suspension and if no determination has been made, on the

basis of Department of Justice advice, that substantial interests of the Government in pending or

contemplated legal proceedings based on the same facts as the suspension would be prejudiced, the

contractor may request a fact-finding conference. The Suspending Official will conduct fact-finding

and base the decision in accordance with FAR 9.407–3(b)(2) and (d) and (e).
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

I-96-67 October 8, 1996 

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

 AT HADDAM NECK NUCLEAR PLANT

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Connecticut

Yankee Atomic Power Company on Friday, October 18, to discuss apparent violations of

NRC requirements at the Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant in Haddam, Connecticut. The

predecisional enforcement conference, which is open to the public for observation only, will

begin at 9 a.m. at the Hawthorne Inn, 2387 Berlin Turnpike in Berlin, Connecticut. 

 The apparent violations were identified during several NRC regular and special

inspections, starting last November. The apparent violations include errors in design basis

documents, errors introduced by design changes, inadequate corrective actions, errors in

evaluations required by NRC regulations, failure to update the Final Safety Analysis Report,

and violations having to do with the operability of equipment, including the containment air

recirculation fans and the residual heat removal system. 

 The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean that

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have

been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed

corrective actions. No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. 

Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.
#### In the Matter of Myred Amusement Corp., Petitioner, against John F. O’Connell, et al., Individually and as Members of the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
### §14045d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14045d was editorially reclassified as section 20126 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David Naylor, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/S/ David Naylor
David Naylor Treasurer, CFO and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)

May 7, 2007

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
June 21, 2016 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the May 2016 monthly status report on 

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated carryover 

funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC activities in May 

2016 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 

the case In re Aiken County regarding the licensing process for the U.S. Department of Energy’s 

Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Ed Whitfield 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Catherine Bach, Deceased. Mary Glanton, Appellant; Catherine McKendry, as Executrix of Catherine Bach, Deceased, Respondent.

Decree and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The decree admits a will to probate. The order denies contestant’s motion to open the default and vacate the probate.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 395 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the pilot 

program for alternative water source projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2011 

Mr. MCNERNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend 

the pilot program for alternative water source projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Communities 

5 Water Supply Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER 

7 SOURCE PROJECTS. 

8 (a) SELECTION OF PROJECTS.—Section 220(d)(2) of 

9 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 

10 1300(d)(2)) is amended by inserting before the period at 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 395 IH

1 the end the following: ‘‘or whether the project is located 

2 in an area which is served by a public water system serving 

3 10,000 individuals or fewer’’. 

4 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

5 220(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

6 U.S.C. 1300(j)) is amended by striking ‘‘$75,000,000 for 

7 fiscal years 2002 through 2004’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$125,000,000’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26813]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: December 8, 2004 3 p.m.-5 p.m.

Place: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b. (c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(2) and (6))

Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or Carol Booker 
at (202) 203-203-4545.

    Dated: December 1, 2004.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-26813 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED FROM COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY FORM
                         10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
                         SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
                         BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000

                         <S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              625
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   369,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       8,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                419,096
<PP&E>                                        1,386,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                  728,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,199,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           140,141
<BONDS>                                         279,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         27,561
<OTHER-SE>                                      583,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,199,866
<SALES>                                         256,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                272,947
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   148,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               18,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 105,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                     38,922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              66,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     66,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
#### Emanuel Guttman v. Whitehall Improvement Corporation.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See 281 App. Div. 528.]