alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU.

¡Ayude a mantener a Estados Unidos 

libre de esta enfermedad mortal!

¿Necesita más información? www.aphis.usda.gov

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU. es un proveedor, empleador y 

prestador que ofrece igualdad de oportunidades.

Servicio de Inspección de Sanidad de Plantas y Animales

Programa de asistencia número 2237-4S • Emitido en marzo de 2019

El Departamento de Agricultura de los 

EE.UU. 

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU.

 INFORME SOBRE 

LOS CERDOS ENFERMOS

1-866-536-7593

PESTE PORCINA AFRICANA

¿QUÉ ES LA BIOSEGURIDAD? 

La bioseguridad se refiere a 

todas las medidas tomadas para 

mantener a las enfermedades y a los 

patógenos que las acarrean (virus, 

bacterias, hongos, parásitos y otros 

microorganismos) lejos de los cerdos, 

la propiedad y las personas.

La peste porcina africana 

(PPA o ASF por sus siglas en 

inglés) es una enfermedad 

viral que afecta a los cerdos 

domésticos y salvajes. Se 

propaga fácilmente y mata 

a la mayoría de los cerdos 

que la contraen. Nunca se 

encontraron casos de PPA 

en Estados Unidos. 

Las personas no pueden 

contraer PPA, pero pueden 

acarrearla en la ropa, 

los zapatos y los equipos. 

Un brote en los Estados 

Unidos tendría efectos 

económicos devastadores 

para la industria porcina. 

Proteja su granja 

con bioseguridad

Las personas pueden propagar la enfermedad sin saberlo. 

Para proteger a sus cerdos, 

use rigurosas prácticas de 

bioseguridad en su granja todos 

los días, durante todo el día.

SEPA QUIÉN Y QUÉ ESTÁ PRESENTE EN SU GRANJA 

No permita que nadie con la enfermedad llegue a su granja.

l Revise y evalúe los planes de 

bioseguridad de manera rutinaria con 

un veterinario autorizado y realice las 

actualizaciones o mejoras si es necesario. 

¿No tiene un plan? Desarrolle uno y sígalo.

l Asegúrese de que todas las personas que entran en su granja 

(trabajadores y visitantes) conocen y siguen las prácticas de bioseguridad.

l Proporcione capacitaciones de bioseguridad para los trabajadores nuevos 

o para cualquier persona que frecuente la granja.

l Limite lo más posible el tráfico dentro de la granja.

l Mantenga registros detallados de las personas, los 

vehículos y los equipos de su granja u otras instalaciones 

de producción porcina.

l Limpie y desinfecte todos los equipos y vehículos que 

entren en el sitio o salgan de este.

l Aísle a los cerdos enfermos de la piara, y manténgalos 

lejos de los visitantes.

l Pregúnteles a los visitantes si hicieron viajes 

internacionales recientemente. No permita que 

nadie que haya estado en un país afectado por la 

peste porcina africana (PPA o ASF por sus siglas 

en inglés) entre en su granja hasta al menos cinco 

días después de haber regresado a los Estados Unidos.

l Asegúrese de que los visitantes usen ropa y zapatos 

limpios en todas las instalaciones y granjas de producción porcina.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 16-2262

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v. Landein Charles Craddock lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: November 15, 2016 Filed: November 18, 2016 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. After pleading guilty to robbery and firearm charges, Landein Charles Craddock appeals the district court’s 1 order revoking his supervised release and

1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.sentencing him to a total term of 46 months in prison, to run consecutively to a 15-year sentence imposed in the Districtof Kansas. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. The district court did not abuse its di scretion in sentencing Craddock, as the court imposed the within-Guidelines se ntence after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and acted within its di scretion in imposing consecutive sentences. See United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (under substantive-reasonableness test, district court abuses its discretion if it fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant we ight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing factors); United States v. Petreikis , 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) (any term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supe rvised release shall be ordered to be served consecutively to any sentence of imprisonment that defendant is serving, whether or not sentence of imprisonment being served resulted from conduct that is basis of revocation); United States v. Cotroneo , 89 F.3d 510, 512 (8th Cir. 1996) (decision to impose consecutive or concurre nt sentence upon revocation of supervised release is committed to sound discretion of district court). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-
### §17002. Relationship to other law

Except to the extent expressly provided in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, nothing in this Act or an amendment made by this Act supersedes, limits the authority provided or responsibility conferred by, or authorizes any violation of any provision of law (including a regulation), including any energy or environmental law or regulation.

(Pub. L. 110–140, §3, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1498.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 110–140, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1492, known as the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which enacted this chapter and enacted and amended numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 17001 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee, Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research Review Committee.                     

*Date:*                         January 25-27, 2005.                     

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton Monterey, 1000 Aguajita Road, Monterey, CA 93940.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Quirijn Vos. PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 451-2666,                         *qvos@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 04-26897  Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §13865. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13865 was editorially reclassified as section 12225 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 210.6A-03 Statements of financial condition.

Statements of financial condition filed under this rule shall comply with the following provisions:

# Plan Assets

1. *Investments in securities of participating employers.* State separately each class of securities of the participating employer or employers.

2. *Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers.*

(a) *United States Government bonds and other obligations.* Include only direct obligations of the United States Government.

(b) *Other securities.* State separately (1) marketable securities and (2) other securities.

3. *Investments. Other than securities.* State separately each major class.

4. *Dividends and interest receivable.*

5. *Cash.*

6. *Other assets.* State separately (a) total of amounts due from participating employers or any of their directors, officers and principal holders of equity securities; (b) total of amounts due from trustees or managers of the plan; and (c) any other significant amounts.

# Liabilities and Plan Equity

7. *Liabilities.* State separately (a) total of amounts payable to participating employers; (b) total of amounts payable to participating employees; and (c) any other significant amounts.

8. *Reserves and other credits.* State separately each significant item and describe each such item by using an appropriate caption or by a footnote referred to in the caption.

9. *Plan equity at close of period.*

[27 FR 7870, Aug. 9, 1962. Redesignated at 47 FR 56843, Dec. 21, 1982]
### Part C—Transmission Rate Reform
### §13472. High efficiency heat engines

#### (a) Program direction

The Secretary shall conduct a 5-year program, in accordance with sections 13541 and 13542 of this title, to improve the efficiency of heat engines. Such program shall—

(1) include field demonstrations of sufficient scale and number so as to demonstrate technical and economic feasibility;

(2) incorporate materials that increase engine efficiency; and

(3) cover advanced engine designs for electric and industrial power generation for a range of small-, mid-, and large-scale applications, including—

(A) mechanically recuperated gas turbines;

(B) intercooled gas turbines with steam injection or recuperation;

(C) gas turbines utilizing reformed fuels or hydrogen; and

(D) high efficiency, simple cycle gas turbines.

#### (b) Program goal

The goal of the program established under subsection (a) shall be to develop heat engines that can achieve over 50 percent efficiency in the mid-term.

#### (c) Program plan

Within 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Congress a 5-year program plan, to be included in the plan required under section 13451(c) of this title, to guide the activities under this section. In preparing the program plan, the Secretary shall consult with appropriate representatives of industry, institutions of higher education, Federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and national laboratories, and professional and technical societies.

#### (d) Proposals

Within 1 year after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals for conducting activities under this section.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this section such sums as may be necessary to be derived from sums authorized under section 13451(e) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2112, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3072.)
Part 5335 - Research and Development

Contracting

DAFFARS PART 5335 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

5335.015-70 Special Use Allowances for Research Facilities Acquired by Educational Institutions

5335.070-1 Indemnification Under Research and Development Contracts

5335.015-70 Special Use Allowances for Research Facilities

Acquired by Educational Institutions

(c) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

(d)(3)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5335.070-1 Indemnification Under Research and

Development Contracts

(a) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for approval authority of requests for indemnification for unusually

hazardous risks under 10 U.S.C. 3861.
### Part J—Services Provided Through Religious Organizations

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, part G of title V of act July 1, 1944, and has been redesignated as part J for purposes of codification. Another part G of title V of act July 1, 1944, is classified to part G (§290hh et seq.) of this subchapter.
Editorial Note on Part 140
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 140 appear at 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 140.95 Delegation of authority with respect to withdrawals from registration. ( a ) The Commission hereby delegates, until such time as the Commission orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and to the Director of the Market Participants Division and to such members of the Commission's staff acting under their direction as they may designate, the authority to review, postpone, condition, deny, or otherwise act upon a request for withdrawal from registration.
( b ) The Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and the Director of the Market Participants Division may submit any matter which has been delegated to them under paragraph (a) of this section to the Commission for its consideration.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated to the Director of the Division of Clearing and Risk and to the Director of the Market Participants Division under paragraph (a) of this section.
[46 FR 48918, Oct. 5, 1981, as amended at 67 FR 62353, Oct. 7, 2002; 78 FR 22419, Apr. 16, 2013]
# Subpart 3412.2—Special Requirements for the Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services

**Parent topic:**PART 3412—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

## 3412.203 Procedures for solicitation, evaluation, and award.

As specified in 3413.003, simplified acquisition procedures for commercial products and commercial services may be used without regard to any dollar or timeframe limitations described in FAR subpart 13.5 when acquired by the FSA and used for its purposes.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC



EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|/s/ MICHAEL W. PALKOVIC                                              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Michael W. Palkovic Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 7, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,

acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature required by Section 906, has been provided to the

Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the

Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2007
#### § 210.6-01 Application of §§ 210.6-01 to 210.6-11.

Sections 210.6-01 through 210.6-11shall be applicable to financial statements filed for registered investment companies and business development companies.

[81 FR 82010, Nov. 18, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 54064, Aug. 31, 2020]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH EVELYN WING,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:09-cr-00010-F-1; 5:10-cv-00170-F)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Evelyn Wing, Appellant Pro Se. Joe Exum, Jr., Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Joshua Bryan 

Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Evelyn Wing seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wing

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50514

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO JIMENEZ-OROZCO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-651-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Armando Jimenez-Orozco (Jimenez) appeals from his 57-month sentence

for illegal reentry; his sentence fell at the bottom of the guidelines range. He

argues that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to

explain its reasons for denying his request for a below-guidelines sentence.

Because Jimenez did not object to his sentence in the district court, we

review for plain error. See United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th

Cir. 2007). The district court’s comments indicate that it considered Jimenez’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-50514 Document: 00511205582 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
No. 09-50514

arguments but also took into account his history and the need to deter him from

committing further crimes against the public in the future. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a); Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The district court was

not required to engage in “robotic incantations that each statutory factor has

been considered.” United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The within-guidelines sentence

is presumed to be substantively reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435

F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). This court has previously affirmed as

substantively reasonable sentences within the guidelines range in other illegal

reentry cases when defendants raised similar arguments for below-guidelines

sentences. See United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565 (5th Cir.

2008); United States v. Rodriguez, 523 F.3d 519, 526 (5th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 09-50514 Document: 00511205582 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2010