1

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable)

**SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION** 
**A. Justification** 1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary . Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard cop y of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information , or you may provide a valid URL link or paste the applicable section 1 . Specify the review t ype of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) . If revised, brie fl y specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed sections, if applicable. This request is for revi sion of the approval of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements that are contained in the information collect ion 1845

- 0049 for Student Assistance G eneral Provision regulations Subpart J

- Approval of Independently Administered Tests; Specification of Passing Score; Approval of State Process. These regulations govern the application for and approval by the Secretary of assessments by a private test publisher or State that are used to measure a student’s skills and abilities . T he administration of approved ability to benefit (ATB) tests may be used to determine a student's eligibility

for assistance f

or the Title IV student financial assistance programs authorized under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) when the student does not have a high school diploma or its recognized equivalent

. The H EA , as amended by the Consolidated Appropri ation Act, 2012 (Pub. L . 11 2

- 74 ) changed the Federal student aid eligibility criteria for students without a high school diploma or the recognized equivalent of a high school diploma. The statute retained the completion of a homeschool program as an eligi bility alternative , but removed the passing of an independently administered Department approved ATB test as an eligibility criteria previously

avai lable to aid applicants. This change was effective for students who first enrolled in a program of study on or after July 1, 2012. Official guidance from the Department maintains that for students who previously attended an eligible program prior to July

1, 2012 and need to establish Title IV eligibility after July 1, 2012, the provisions of Public L aw 112

- 74 do not apply and will not prevent those students from using prior ATB alternatives including passing an ATB test. Because of this change there are a diminishing number of student applicants who could qualify to use the passing an ATB test alternative to determine Title IV eligibility . There has also been a decrease in the number of previously approved ATB examinations as test publishers have notified the Department that they are voluntaril y removing their examinations from being used for ATB purposes.

1 Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 paragraphs.2

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) T he language of the current regulations has not changed. This application will show a decrease in the number of tests and students who may use them from prior burden estimates. 2. Indicate how, by

whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. The Department of Education is responsible for evaluating the quality of the State plans and private ATB test publisher tests submitted under the provisions articulated by the Secretary . Department staff will read the submitted tests and use psychometrician services to evaluate the submitted ATB tests using the Secretary 's guidelines in these established regulations to det ermine if the tests meet the conditions for approval by the Secretary

. Postsecondary

institutions will evaluate the test scores obtained b y the student applicants for Federal student assistance to determine whether the student is eligible under the law for Title IV, HEA program assistance. 3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology , e.g. perm itting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe an y consideration given to using technology

to reduce burden. Although there are no legal or technical obstacles to the use of technology in this information collection activity , the process for applicants to submit their tests for approval is generall y not conducive to an y more sophisticated use of technology

. However, over time we have seen ATB test publishers move from “paper and pencil” tests to computer

- based testing and expect this trend to continue . As testing move s into computer

- based formats, the reporting of the test results by test publishers to the institutions the student plans to attend should be more automated, unt il then States and test publishers will continue to provide students with a paper output report or electronic output document, and institutions with an electronic output document. 4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specificall y wh y an y si milar information alread y available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above. The information supplied for State provided plans, for ATB test publisher applications for test approval, and in the students' test score results is not duplicated on any other information collection. 5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entit y may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not

- for

- profit enterprise that is independently3

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city , count y, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000. No small businesses are affected b y this information collection. 6. Describe the consequences t o Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequentl y, as well as an y technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden. If this collection is not conducted it is possible that a student without aid eligib ility could receive federal student aid in conflict with the law and in violation of the Department’s fiduciary responsibilities to protect the government and taxpay er against loss through fraud and mismanagement. Alternatel y, without this collection, an otherwise eligible student may

be denied a federal benefit for which they are eligible. 7. Explain any

special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

 requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterl y;
 requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 day s after receipt of it;

 requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

 requiring respon dents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant

- in

- aid, or tax records for more than three y ears;
 in connection with a statistical survey , that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study ;
 requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved b y OMB;

 that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by

authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessaril y i mpedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law. This application is consistent with all of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d) ( 2), except for the request for multiple copies of each test. These tests are cop yri ghted and cannot be duplicated b y the Department for review purposes. Therefore, the Department is requesting a waiver for 5 CFR 1320.5(d) ( 2 ) ( iii). Multiple copies of the tests are required because the tests are reviewed and analyzed by Department staff and several testing experts under agreement with the Department, before any test approval is granted by the Secretary

.4

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) 8. As applicable, state that the Department has publi shed the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required b y 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken b y the agenc y in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability

of data, frequency

of collection, the clarity

of instru ction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if an y), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records shoul d occur at least once every 3 y ears

– even if the collection of information activity

is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained. This reques t is for the 3 0 day Federal Register notice seeking public comment on these burden assessments. The Department previously issued a 6 0

- day Federal Register notice requesting public comment. No comments were received

. 9. Explain any

decision to provide any pay ment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification

. There are no pay

ments or gifts to respondents. 10. Describe an y assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy . If personally

identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Sy stems of Record Notice and the date a Pri vacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the I C Data Form . A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided. 2 If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy

Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality . I f there is no expectation of confidentiality , simply state that the Department make s no pledge about the confidentiall y of the data. There is no assurance of confidentiality provided to the respondents concerning the application for State plans or test approval and assurance of confidentiality for the submission of test scores.

2 Requests for this inform ation are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A

- 108

– Privacy Act Implementation

– Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A

- 130 Appendix I

– Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Re cords About Individuals, OMB M

- 03

- 22

– OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E

- Government Act of 2002, OMB M

- 06

- 15

– Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6

- 104

– Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of P ersonally Identifiable Information)5

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) 11. Provide additional justification for an y questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes , religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons wh y the agency considers the questions necessary , the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to per sons from whom the information is requested, and an y steps to be taken to obtain their consent. There are no questions of a sensitive nature in this application. 12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement sh ould:

 Indicate the number of respondents by affected public ty

pe (federal government, individuals or households, private sector

– businesses or other for

- profit, private sector

– not

- for

- profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), fre quency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special survey s to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widel y beca use of differences in activity , size, or complexity , show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generall y, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

 If this request for ap proval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCI S IC Burden Analy sis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent types, IC activity , Respondent and Responses, Hour s/Response, and Total Hours)

 Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for informat ion collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14. D ue to changes in the statute regarding ava ilability of ATB tests for new students, there has been a decrease in both the number of students taking the tests as well as the number of approved tests available as test publishers have voluntarily removed certain exams from ATB use. The request for ATB test approval from independent test publishers or the request for approval of a State process will continue to be as often as the test developers determine it is in their interest to apply for the Secretary 's approval or as the agreement reaches its expiration consistent with the regulations in Subpart J. To date, there have been zero State submi ssions for approval and a s noted earlier some previousl y approved examinations have been voluntarily removed from use by

the test publisher as an ATB examination. Therefore there is a decrease in the burden assessed publishers for the submission of the re newal of these examinations.6

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) The submission of the student’s test score results from the test publisher to the institution generall y, will occur only once. In other cases, where the institution is a two

- year or four

- ye ar degree granting institution or a public postsecondary vocational institution and the institution has a qualified assessment center, the center may score the student’s ATB test and provide the results to the student’s institution. Because of the change in the law , fewer students will have the ability to use an approved ATB examination to meet the general student eligibility criteria for Title IV, HEA program assistance. **Section 668.144**

**– Application for test approval.**  Section 668.144(c ) ( 16) & (d) ( 7) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectivel y, as part of its ATB test application describe its process to determine how a test administrator has the necessary training, knowledge, skills , and integrit y to test students, as well as how a test administrator has the ability and fac ilities to keep its test secure against disclosure or release. We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 2.5 additional hours to develop its process to establish that a test administrator has the necessary training, knowledge, skill s and integrity to test students. Pursuant to prior regulatory requirements, e ach test publisher or State was required to have a process for determin ing the level of training, knowledge , and skills of a test administrator , the new final requirement includ es a process to determine the integrity of the test administrator and to report their process to the Secretary in its submission for approval. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for the For Profit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 8 8 X 2.5 hours 20 Revised Burden for the F or P rofit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 4 4 X 2.5 hours 1 0 Section 668.144(c)(17) & (d)(8) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectivel y, will explain to the Secretary its test anomaly

anal ysis; how it will identify potential test irregularities and make a determination that test irregularities have occurred; an explanation of the process and procedures for corrective action, including decertificat ion of a certified test administrator; and report information on when and how it will notify a test administrator, the Secretary , the institutions where the test irregularities occurred, that the test administrator has been decertified. We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 75 hours to develop its test anomaly process and to establish its test anomaly anal ys is and explain it to the Secretary

. That explanation must include its test irregularit y detection process, its corrective ac tion process, including its decertification of test administrator process, as well as its reporting processes.7

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for the For Profit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 8 8 X 75 hours 600 Revised Burden for the For Profit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 4 4 X 75 hours 300 Section 668.144(c)(18) & (d)(9) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectivel y, will describe to the Secretary the ty pes of accommodations available to individuals with disabilities, including an explanation of any accessible technologies and a description of the process for a test administrator to identify and report when accommodations for individuals with disabilities were provided. We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 1 hour to develop and describe to the Secretary

the ty pes of accommodations ava ilable to individuals with disabilities, the process the test administrator will use to support the identification of the disability and the process to report when accommodations were used. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for the For Profit S ector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 8 8 X 1 hour 8 Revised Burden for the For Profit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 4 4 X 1hour 4 Current Sub

- total for 34 CFR 668.144: # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 24 24 628 Revised Sub

- total for 34 CFR 668.144: # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 12 12 314 **Section 668.150**

**– Agreement between the Secretary and a test publisher or a**  **State.** Section 668.150(b ) ( 2) requires that each test publisher or State to obtain a certification statement from each prospective test administrator indicating that he or she is not currentl y decertified and that if the test administrator becomes decertified by another test publisher or State that the test administrator will immediately notify all other test publishers or States for whom the test administrator administers ATB tests. We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take .5 hour s (30 minutes) to review its process to obtain a certification statement from each prospective test administrator. We estimate that it will take each prospective test administrator .17 hours (10 minutes) to access, read, certify and submit the written certification to the test8

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) publis her or State, as applicable. We estimate that each test publisher or State, as applicable, will take .08 hours (5 minutes) to review each certification. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for Individuals ( 3,774 test administrators ) # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 3,774 3,774 X .17 hours 642 Revised Burden for Individuals (1887 test administrators) # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 1,887 1,887 X .17 hours 321 Current Burden for F or P rofits p rocess development # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 8 8 X 1 hour 8 Revised Burden for For Profits process review # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 4 4 X

. 5 hours 2 Current Burden for For Profits r ev iew of submitted certifications # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 3,774 3,774 X .08 hour 302 Revised Burden for For Profits rev iew of submitted certifications # of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours 1,887 1,887 X .08 hour 151 Section 668.150(b ) ( 6) requires that the test publisher or State, respectivel y, immediately notify the test administrator, the Secretary , and the institutions where the test administrator previously

administered the ATB tests when it decertifies a test administrator. We estimate that 1 percent of the universe of test administrators or 19 test administrators will become decertified. We estimate that it will take test publishers and States 1 hour per decertification to notify the test administrators, the Secretary , and the affected institutions for a total of 19 hours of burden. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for For Profits decertification process # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: Test publishers

- 3,774 test administrators X .01 = 38 38 38 X 1 hour = 38 hours9

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) Revised Burden for For Profits decertification process # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: Test publishers

- 1,887 test administrators X .01 = 19 19 19 X 1 hour = 19 hours Section 668.150(b)(7) requires that when the test publisher or State makes a determination that ATB tests have been improperly administered, the final regulations require that the affected students and prospective students must be notified by the respective test publisher or State. In addition, the final regulations require that the respective test publisher or State are required to provide a report to the Secretary on the results of their review and determination of improper AT B test administration, the notifications to the institutions, students and prospective students. We estimate that it will take each test publisher or State, as applicable, 3 hours to review their process to determine when ATB tests have been improperl y administered. We estimate that 240 , 882 ATB tests will be provided per y ear and estimate that 1 % of those tests could be improperl y administered or 2 , 409 affected students or prospective stud ents would require notification from the test publisher or State. We estimate that the notification process and any follow

- up contact to average .33 hours (20 minutes) per contact and .25 hours (15 minutes) per student. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for F or P rofit S ector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours ATB test publishers to develop a process to determine when an ATB test has been improperly

administered : 8 8 X 5 h ours = 40 hours ATB test publisher imme diate notification to affected students and prospective students of improper testing:

4,818 4 , 818 X .25 hours = 1,205 hours Test publishers reporting to the Department the res ults of review and notification to institutions and students who have been improperly tested: 4,818 4 , 818 X .33 hours = 1,590 hours Revised Burden for For Profit Sector # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours ATB test publishers to review. process to determine when an ATB test has been impro perly

administered: 4 4 X 3 hours = 12 hours ATB test publisher immediate notification to affected students and prospective students of improper testing:

2,409 2,409 X .25 hours = 602 hours Test publishers reporting to the Department the results of review and notification to institutions and students who have been improperly tested:

2,409 2,409 X .33 hours = 795 hours :10

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable)
Section 668.150(b)(8) requires that when a test publisher or State, respectively , re - certifies a previousl y decertified test administrator after the three year decertification period, the final regulations require the test publisher or State to report to the Secretary inform ation on previously decertified test administrators that it re

- certifies. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for F or P rofit Sector Test publishers: 38 de

- certifications X .02 % recertified = 1 recertification after the 3

- y

r period # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours 1 1 1 Revised Burden for For P rofit Sector Test publishers: 19 de

- certifications X .02 % recertified = 1 recertification after the 3

- yr period # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours 1 1 1 Section 668.150(b)(13) requires to require that test publishers or a State analyze the test scores for all ATB test takers every 18 months to determine if there are any irregular patterns that raises an inference of improper test administration. We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 75 hours to conduct its test anomaly process to establish its test anomaly analy sis and report the results to the Secretary at the end of each 18

- m onth period. That explanation must include its test irregularit y detection process results, its corrective action process results, including its decertification of test administrator process results, as well as its reporting processes. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for For Profit Sector 8 approved ATB tests X 75 hours = 600 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 8 8 600 Revised Burden for For Profit Sector 4 approved ATB tests X 75 hours = 300 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 4 4 300 Section 668.150(b)(15) requires that the test publisher or State immediately report to the Secretary if it finds any

credible information indicating that the approv ed ATB test has been compromised.11

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) We estimate 240 , 882 ATB tests will be taken each y ear, of that number we estimate that in .0 0 1 % of the tests or 241 cases will be compromised and therefore required to be reported to the Secretary . We estimate the colle ction of credible information and its reporting to the Secretary to take 1 hour per incidence. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for F or P rofit Sector Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests: 481,763 X .001 = 482 cases X 1 hour = 482 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours 482 482 482 Revised Burden for For Profit Sector Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests: 240,882 X .001 = 241 cas es X 1 hour = 241 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours 241 241 241 Section 668.150(b)(16) requires that the test publisher or State immediately report to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Education an y credible information indicating that a test administrator or institution may have engaged in fraud or other criminal mis conduct. We estimate 240,882 ATB tests will be taken each y ear, of that number we estimate that in .0 0 1 % of the tests or 241 cases that will be credible information indicating that a test administrator or institution may have engaged in fraud or other c riminal conduct. We estimate the collection of credible information and its reporting to the Office of the Inspector General to take 1 hour per incidence. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for F or P rofit Sector Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests: 481,763 X .001 = 482 cases X 1 hour = 482 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 482 482 482 Revised Burden for For Profit Sector Test publishers data collection and r eporting of compromised ATB tests: 240,882 X .001 = 241 cases X 1 hour = 241 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours 241 241 241 Section 668.150(b)(17) requires that all certified test administrators are requi red to report to the test publisher or State, respectivel y, the nature of the disability and any accommodations provided when approved ATB tests are given to individuals with disabilities.12

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable)
We estimate that the average amount of time that a test publisher or State, as applicable, will take to review its process for having test administrators report the nature of the test taker’s disability

and any accommodation provided to the individual with the disability to be 1 hours per test. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for F or P rofit Sector T est publishers: 8 tests X 2 hours for development & implementation = 16 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 8 8 16 Revised Burden for For Profit Sector Test publishers: 4 tests X 1 hours for development & impleme ntation = 4 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 4 4 4 Census information indicates that 12 % of the U.S. population is severel y disabled, we estimate that 28 , 906 of the ATB test takers will be individuals with disabilit ies. We estimate that on average it will take .08 hours (5 minutes) per case to report the nature of the disability

and any accommodation that the test administrator made for the test taker. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current Burden for Individuals : Test administrators: 481,763 ATB test takers X 12% with disabilities =

57,812 cases X .08 hours per case reported = 4,625 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 57,812 57,812 4,625 Revised Burden for Individuals: Test administrators: 240,882 ATB test takers X 12% with disabilities =

28,906 cases X .08 hours per case reported = 2,312 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 28,906 28,906 2,312 Current Sub

- total for 34 CFR 668. 150: # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 76,031 76,031 10,031 Revised Sub

- total for 34 CFR 668.150: # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 3 8 , 016 3 8 , 016 5 , 0 0113

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) **Section 668.151**

**– Administration of tes**  **ts.** Section 668.151(g)(4 ) requires that institutions where approved ATB test are given b y certified test administrators either at assessment centers or b y an independent test administrators, maintain the name and address of the test administrator who administered the test. Section 668.151(g)(5) requires that if the individual who took the test has a disability and as a result was unable to be evaluated b y the use of a conventional test or required test accommodations, that documentation of the individual’s disability and of the testing arrangements must be maintained b y the institution. We estimate that on average it will take an institution .08 hours (5 minutes) per ATB test to collect and maintain the identifier information on each test administrator for each ATB test pr ovided, therefore we estimate a total burden of 19 , 27 1 hours (240,882 x .08) . In addition, for the estimated 28 , 906 ATB test takers who are individuals with disabilities that it will take an additional .08 hours (5 minutes) per test taker to collect and m aintain documentation on the individual’s disability and the testing accommodations that were made b y the test administrator for the ATB test

- taker for 2,31 3 hours (28,906 x .08).

. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Section 668.151(g)(4)

–requirement that insti tutions maintain the identifier information for all certified ATB test administrators. Current burden for For Profit Institutions 481,763 ATB test takers X .3 6 % ( For Profit institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) = 173, 445 X .0 8 hours = 13,876 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 173,445 173,445 13,876 Revised burden for For Profit Institutions 240,882 ATB test takers X .38% (For Profit institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) = 91 , 535 X .08 hours = 7,323 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 91,535 91,535 7,323 Current burden for Private Institutions 481,763 ATB test takers X .31% ( P rivate Institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) = 149,347 X .08 hours = 11,948 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 149,347 149,347 11,948 Revised burden for Private Institutions 240,882 ATB test takers X .38% (Private Institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) = 72,265 X .08 hours = 5,781hours14

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 72,265 72,265 5 , 78 1 Current b urden for Public Institutions 481,763 ATB test takers X .33% (public institutions as a percentage of all parti cipating institutions) 158,962 X .08 hours = 12,717 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 15 8,962 158,962 12,717 Revised burden for Public Institutions 240,882 ATB test takers X .32% (Public Institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) = 77,082 X .08 hours = 6,167 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 77,082 77,082 6,167 Section 668.151(g)(5)

–requirement that institutions collect and maintain documentation of the individual ATB test

- takers disability and of any

accommodating provided by the certified test administrator to the ATB test

- taker (668.151(g)(5)). AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN: Current burden For Profit Institutions 57,812 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .36 (proprietary

institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 20,812 X .08 hours per case reported = 1,665 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 20,812 20,812 1,665 Revised burden For Profit Institutions 28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X . 38 (proprietary institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 10,984 X .08 hours per case reported = 879 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 10,984 10,984 879 Current burden for Private Institutions 57,812 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .31 (private non - profit institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 17,922 X .08 hours per case reported = 1,434 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 17,922 17,922 1,434 Revised burden for Private Institutions 28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .30 (proprietary institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 8,672 X .08 hours per case reported = 694 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:15

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable)

8,672 8,672 694 Current burden for Public Institutions 57,812 cases of individuals with disabiliti es taking an ATB test X .33 (public institutions as a percentage of all partic ipating institutions) 19,078 X .08 hours per case reported = 1,526 hours # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 19,078 19,078 1,526 Revised burden Public Institutions 28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .32 (proprietary institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 9,250 X .08 hours per case reported = 740 hours # of Response s: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 9,250 9,250 740

SUB

- TOTAL for 34 CFR 668.151:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: Current 539,566 539,566 43,166 Revised 269,788 269,788 21.584 **Section 668.152**

**– Administrati**  **on of tests by assessment centers.** The regulations require that if the test assessment center scores the approved ATB test that it must provide a copy of the completed test to the test publisher or State, as applicable, on a weekl y basis to include either; the name, address, and an y other identifier provided b y the test publisher or State of the test administrator who administered the test; or a report of all test

- takers’ scores and institutions to which the scores were sent and the name, address, an d an y other identifier provided by the test publisher or State of the test administrator who administered the test. We estimate that of the 1 , 887 test administrators, approximately one - third or 629 are at test assessment centers. AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current burden for Private Institutions We estimate that 18% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at private non

profit institutions. 1,256 assessment centers X .18 = 226 X .08 hours (5 minutes) X 52 weeks equals 940 hours of additional burden. # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:16

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable)

226 226 940 Revised burden for Private Institutions We estimate that 18% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at private non

profit institutions. 629 assessment centers X .18 = 113 X .08 hours (5 minutes) X 52 weeks equals 470 hours of additional burden. # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 113 113 470 Current burden for Public Institutions We estimate that 82% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at public institutions. 1,256 assessment centers X .82 = 1,030 X .08 hours (5 minutes) X 52 weeks equals 4,285 hours of additional burden. # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 1,030 1,030 4,285 Revised burden for Public Institutions We estimate that 82% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at public institut ions. 629 assessment centers X .82 = 516 X .08 hours (5 minutes) X 52 weeks equals 2,147 hours of additional burden. # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: 516 516 2,147 SUB

- TOTAL for 34 C FR 668.152: # of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours: Current 1,256 1,256 5,225 Revised 629 629 2,617

**Section 668.153**

**– Administration of tests for individuals whose native language is**  **not English or for individuals with disabilities.**  The regulations require that the test administrator must ensure that there is documentation to support the determination that the individual has a disability and requires accommodations, however, the burden associated with this final requi rement is in the maintenance of the documentation by the institution in §668.151(g)(5)

- see above.17

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) Total Respondents, Responses and Burden Hours: # of Respondents # of Responses # Hrs Burden **Section 668.144**

**– Application for test approval.** 

12 12 314 **Section 668.150**

**– Agreement between the Secretary and a test publisher or a State.** 

3 8 , 016 3 8 , 016 5 ,0 0 1 **Section 668.151**

**– Administration of tests.**  269 , 788 269,788 21 , 584 **Section 668. 152** 

**– Administration of tests by assessment centers.** 

629 629 2,617 T otal # of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours

3 08 , 445 3 08 , 445 2 9, 516 Current Inventory : # of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours 618,042 976,887 240,160 Net reduction # of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours

- 30 9 , 597

- 66 8 , 442

- 210,644 13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start

- up cost component (annualized over its exp ected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of m ethods used to estimate major cost factors including s ys tem and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start

- up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

 If cost estimates are expected to vary widel y, agencie s should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10),18

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) utilize the 60

- day

pre - OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory

impact anal ys is associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

 Generally , est imates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to prov ide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12 Total Annual ized Capital/Startup Cost : Total Annual Costs (O&M) :

____________________ Total Annualized Costs Requested : There are no startup costs. 14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
T here are no additional costs to the Federal government as a result of the final regulations. 15. Explain the reasons for an y program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re

- estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency ’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materiall y changes a collection of information and generally are result o f new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by t ype of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), ty

pe of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours , responses and cost s (if applicable)

. The burden decrease of 210,644 hours is due to statutory changes. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public L aw 112

- 74) changed the definition of Federal student aid eligibility

criteria for students who do not have a high school diploma or its recognized equivalent as defined in Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended. As of July

1, 2012, the new law eliminated all but the completion of a homeschool program as an eligibility alternative previously

available. Due to these changes, there is a decreasing pool o f student applicant s who would be eligible to take a Department approved ability to benefit exam to determine Title IV student aid eligibility

. There has also been a decrease in the number of approved ability to benefit examinations19

ICRAS Tracki ng and OMB Number: (1423) 1845

- 0049 v8 Revised: 10/23 /2013 RIN Number: XXXX

- XXXX (if applicable) as test publishers hav e notified the Department that they are voluntaril y removing their examinations from being used for this purpose. 16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex anal yt ical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions. This information will not be publish ed. 17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate. ED is not seeking this approval. The OMB number and expiration date will be announced in the Federal Register once approved b y the Office of Management and Budget. 18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act. There are no exceptions to the certification.