alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DERMISONICS, INC.

                           FORM OF BERRA HOLDINGS LTD.

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$_____________                                       (Date  of  Promissory Note)

     DERMISONICS,  INC.,  a  Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"  or  "Maker"),
promises  to  pay  to  BERRA  HOLDINGS LTD., at Chancery Court, Leeward Highway,
Providencials,  Turks  &  Caicos,  or holder ("Payee"), on or before __________,
2007  ("Maturity"),  the sum of ______________ ($____________), with interest on
the unpaid principal balance at the rate of eight percent (8.0%) per annum, with
principal  and  interest  payable  at  Maturity.

     A  default  ("Event  of Default") shall occur on this Note upon (i) Maker's
failure to make the payment required on this Note; (ii) the filing of a petition
in  bankruptcy  by Maker which is not dismissed within sixty (60) days; or (iii)
the  appointment  of a receiver for Maker; (iv) an assignment for the benefit of
creditors.  In  the  case of an Event of Default, the Payee shall have the right
to  declare  the  entire  principal and accrued but unpaid interest on this Note
immediately  due  and  payable.

     Payee  shall  be  entitled  to collect a reasonable attorneys' fee from the
Maker,  as  well  as other costs and expenses reasonably incurred, in curing any
default  or  attempting  collection  of the payment due on this Note.  This Note
shall  be  payable  in  lawful  money  of the United States.  This Note shall be
governed  by  and  construed  solely in accordance with the laws of the State of
Nevada.  If  any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Note is held to
be  invalid,  void,  or unenforceable, the rest of the Note shall remain in full
force  and  effect  and  shall  in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated.

     This  Note  shall be payable in full at any time prior to the maturity date
with  pre-payment  penalty.


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Promissory Note as of the day
first  hereinabove  written  at  Irvine,  California.


MAKER:                    DERMISONICS,  INC.


<PAGE>
                                    By:
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Bruce  H.  Haglund,
                                        Chairman
### §16944. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16944 was editorially reclassified as section 20944 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §18324. Utilization of existing workforce and assets in development of Space Launch System and multi-purpose crew vehicle

#### (a) In general

In developing the Space Launch System pursuant to section 18322 of this title and the multi-purpose crew vehicle pursuant to section 18323 of this title, the Administrator shall, to the extent practicable utilize—

(1) existing contracts, investments, workforce, industrial base, and capabilities from the Space Shuttle and Orion and Ares 1 projects, including—

(A) space-suit development activities for application to, and coordinated development of, a multi-purpose crew vehicle suit and associated life-support requirements with potential development of standard NASA-certified suit and life support systems for use in alternative commercially-developed crew transportation systems; and

(B) Space Shuttle-derived components and Ares 1 components that use existing United States propulsion systems, including liquid fuel engines, external tank or tank-related capability, and solid rocket motor engines; and

(2) associated testing facilities, either in being or under construction as of October 11, 2010.

#### (b) Discharge of requirements

In meeting the requirements of subsection (a), the Administrator—

(1) shall, to the extent practicable, utilize ground-based manufacturing capability, ground testing activities, launch and operations infrastructure, and workforce expertise;

(2) shall, to the extent practicable, minimize the modification and development of ground infrastructure and maximize the utilization of existing software, vehicle, and mission operations processes;

(3) shall complete construction and activation of the A–3 test stand with a completion goal of September 30, 2013;

(4) may procure, develop, and flight test applicable components; and

(5) shall take appropriate actions to ensure timely and cost-effective development of the Space Launch System and the multi-purpose crew vehicle, including the use of a procurement approach that incorporates adequate and effective oversight, the facilitation of contractor efficiencies, and the stream-lining of contract and procurement requirements.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title III, §304, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2816.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sloman Knox, Jr., Appellant.

[818 NYS2d 921]

Spain, J.

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), entered January 25, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside the sentence following his conviction of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, without a hearing.

Previously, this Court affirmed the judgment convicting defendant, following a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him as a persistent felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 16 years to life (232 AD2d 811 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 943*618[1997]). Defendant now appeals from County Court’s denial, in a written decision, of his CPL 440.20 motion to vacate his sentence, arguing that New York’s persistent felony sentencing scheme violates his rights under the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution, relying on *Apprendi v New Jersey*(530 US 466 [2000]). We disagree and affirm.

Defendant argued in his pro se motion to set aside his sentence that his constitutional rights were infringed upon because a judge, rather than a jury, determined whether he would receive an enhanced sentence under the persistent felony offender statutes *(see*Penal Law § 70.10; *see also*CPL 400.20). County Court properly rejected that contention *(see People v Rivera,*5 NY3d 61, 66 [2005], *cert denied*— US —, 126 S Ct 564 [2005]; *People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329, 334-335 [2001], *cert denied*534 US 899 [2001]; *People v Pelkey,*27 AD3d 785, 785 [2006]; *People v Bingham,*24 AD3d 1016, 1017 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 831 [2006]; *People v Conger,*19 AD3d 938, 939 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 827 [2005]).

Defendant now also argues, for the first time on this appeal, that CPL 400.20 was unconstitutional and unconstitutionally applied at the time of his 1993 sentencing and remained so until it was clarified or “cured” in 2001 by the Court of Appeals in *People v Rosen (supra*at 334-335), and later in *People v Rivera (supra*at 66). From that premise, defendant argues that he was sentenced in accordance with a then-constitutionally deficient statute, requiring that his sentence be vacated. Inasmuch as this issue was never raised in his CPL 440.20 motion or otherwise argued in County Court, it has not been preserved for our review *(see People v Pelkey, supra;*CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to address it in the interest of justice.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.
#### § 148.8 Awards against other agencies.

If an applicant is entitled to an award because it prevails over another agency of the United States that participates in an adjudicatory proceeding before the Commission and takes a postion that is not substantially justified, the award or an appropriate portion of the award shall be made against that agency.
### §10143. Title to material

Delivery, and acceptance by the Secretary, of any high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel for a repository constructed under this part shall constitute a transfer to the Secretary of title to such waste or spent fuel.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §123, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2229.)
§ 455.5 Spanish language sales. ( a ) If you conduct a sale in Spanish, the window form required by § 455.2 and the contract disclosures required by § 455.3 must be in that language. You may display on a vehicle both an English language window form and a Spanish language translation of that form. Use the translation and layout for Spanish language sales in Figures 4, 5, and 6.
( b ) Use the following language for the “Implied Warranties Only” disclosure when required by § 455.2(b)(1) as illustrated by Figure 5: SOLO GARANTÍAS IMPLÍCITAS El concesionario no hace ninguna promesa de reparar lo que sea necesario cuando compre el vehículo o posteriormente. Sin embargo, las *garantías implícitas* según las leyes estatales podrían darle algunos derechos para hacer que el concesionario se encargue de ciertos problemas que no fueran evidentes cuando compró el vehículo.
( c ) Use the following language for the “Service Contract” disclosure required by § 455.2(b)(3) as illustrated by Figures 4 and 5: CONTRATO DE MANTENIMIENTO. Con un cargo adicional, puede obtener un contrato de mantenimiento para este vehículo. Pregunte acerca de los detalles de la cobertura, los deducibles, el precio y las exclusiones. Si compra un contrato de mantenimiento dentro de los 90 días desde el momento en que compró el vehículo, las *garantías implícitas* según las leyes de su estado podrían darle derechos adicionales.
( d ) Use the following language if you choose to use the Optional Signature Line provided by § 455.2(f):
Por este medio confirmo que he recibido copia de la Guía del Comprador al momento de la compraventa.
[81 FR 81679, Nov. 18, 2016]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph Frattaroli, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
    ---------------------
May 13, 2005
Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harry Chiert, on Behalf of Robert Stevenson, Appellant, against John F. McNeill, as Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, Respondent.

In 1948 the relator’s friend was committed to Matteawan State Hospital under sections 658 *et seq.*of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In 1952 (cf. Mental Hygiene Law, § 76) the relator brought this habeas corpus proceeding to obtain the inmate’s release on the ground that he is capable of understanding the criminal charge against him, the proceedings in connection therewith, and to make his defense thereto. On the return of the writ the relator demanded a jury trial as of right, and the application was denied. The relator did not offer any proof of mental condition, and the writ was dismissed and the inmate remanded to the hospital. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick T. Doyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/PATRICK T. DOYLEPatrick T. Doyle Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2008


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3912 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3912

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, as the ``Brigadier 
           General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIGADIER GENERAL NATHANIEL WOODHULL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Brigadier General Nathaniel Woodhull Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier 
General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3912

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, as the ``Brigadier 
           General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Robert H. Turner, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 25, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert H. Tuner    
|                   |  | Robert H. Turner       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
| **CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                 |            |   |   |
| Dividends per share declared (in dollars per share)                              | $ 4.72          | $ 3.48 | $ 4.49 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147480008/505-10-S99-1
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DENNIS BOYER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 475 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Cite as In re P.F. , 121 Ohio St.3d 360, 2009-Ohio-1518.]

I N RE P.F. [Cite as In re P.F. , 121 Ohio St.3d 360, 2009-Ohio-1518.] Judgment of the court of appeals reversed on the authority of In re L.A.B. and cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with
In re L.A.B. (No. 2008-1195

— Submitted February 18, 2009

— Decided April 7, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County,

No. 07CA009243, 2008-Ohio-2105.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
In re L.A.B. , 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with In re L.A.B.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

______________________ Dennis P. Will, Lorain County Prosec uting Attorney, and Billie Jo Belcher and Christopher J. Pierre, Assistant Prosecu ting Attorneys, for appellee, state of Ohio. Robert Cabrera, for appellant, P.F.

______________________
#### § 210.3-13 Filing of other financial statements in certain cases.

The Commission may, upon the informal written request of the registrant, and where consistent with the protection of investors, permit the omission of one or more of the financial statements herein required or the filing in substitution therefor of appropriate statements of comparable character. The Commission may also by informal written notice require the filing of other financial statements in addition to, or in substitution for, the statements herein required in any case where such statements are necessary or appropriate for an adequate presentation of the financial condition of any person whose financial statements are required, or whose statements are otherwise necessary for the protection of investors.