alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD05-04-214]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Patapsco River, 
Baltimore, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of implementation of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
at 33 CFR 100.526 during the New Year's Eve Celebration to be held 
December 31, 2004 through January 1, 2005 on the Patapsco River at 
Baltimore, Maryland. These special local regulations are necessary to 
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters before, during and 
after the event. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in 
the regulated area for the safety of spectators and support vessels in 
the event area.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.526 will be enforced from 11:45 p.m., December 31, 
2004 to 12:45 a.m. e.d.t. on January 1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Houck, Marine Events 
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins 
Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland, 21226, (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Baltimore Office of Promotion and the 
Arts will sponsor the ``New Year's Eve Celebration'' on December 31, 
2004 to January 1, 2005 on the waters of the Inner Harbor, Patapsco 
River, Baltimore, Maryland. In order to ensure the safety of 
participants, spectators and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.526 will be 
enforced for the duration of the event. The special local regulations 
will be enforced from 11:45 p.m. December 31, 2004 to 12:45 a.m. e.d.t. 
on January 1, 2005. The pyrotechnic display will be launched from 3 
barges located adjacent to the Inner Harbor within the regulated area. 
Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.526, a vessel may not enter the 
regulated area unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated 
area but may not block a navigable channel.
    In addition to this notice, the maritime community will be provided 
extensive advance notification via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine 
information broadcasts, and area newspapers, so mariners can adjust 
their plans accordingly.

    Dated: November 24, 2004.
Ben R. Thomason, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, 
Acting.
[FR Doc. 04-26844 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
** Home  |  		General Information  |  		Lessons learned  |  		Press Release Archive  |  		Sector Pages**
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, David
      McCourt, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:  October
                14, 2008
            /s/
                David McCourtDavid
                McCourtInterim
                Chief Executive Officer
NRC’s Mission

To license and regulate the civilian use ofbyproduct, source, and special nuclear materialsto ensure adequate protection of public healthand safety, promote the common defense andsecurity, and protect the environment.NRC’s VisionExcellence in regulating the safe and secure useand management of radioactive materials for thepublic good.ProgramsNRC regulates the civilian use of nuclearmaterial in the United States, including nuclearpower plants, research and test reactors, fuelfabrication facilities, transportation, andexport/import of nuclear materials, and otheruses of nuclear materials. We authorizepossession and use of nuclear material throughlicensing, inspect users to ensure safety andsecurity, assess compliance and enforce therequirements, and respond to incidents.

NSIR’s MissionTo prevent nuclear security incidents andrespond to safety and security events.NSIR’s VisionTo be a valued partner in homeland security andFederal emergency response.NSIR’s HistoryFounded April 7, 2002, to consolidate andstreamline NRC security, safeguards, andincident response responsibilities and resources. 

“We will take care of our people, promptly andpassionately... Make no mistake, America willdeliver the necessary responses to protectpublic health and safety, and therefore, there willbe no ‘American Chernobyl’.” 

Chairman Nils J. Diaz

What has Security and inaspects of the and the terroris2001, strengthenhanced secuincreased overradioactive souexpanded our and strengthenState, and locarespond to futuWhat are tthe future Ensure co

response 

 Enhance N

accidents 

 Partner wi

Homeland Investigatiother agenresponse 

 Work with 

and licensincidents
Seeking New Recruits With The

Following Background:In Nuclear Security criminologists law enforcement professionals engineers (most disciplines) security administratorsIn Incident Response nuclear engineers health physicists emergency planners IT specialistsBenefits superior training and development challenging and rewarding work competitive pay scales flexible work schedules

Do you remember

September 11?

That’s why we’re here.

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

(301) 415-6328

NUREG/BR-0310

May 2004

 NUCL

INCID

CAREE

Nuclear R

“The number one priority is to protect America and our way of life.”

Tom Ridge, Secretary

U.S. Department of Homeland Security
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2348

WANDA HUNT, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; WOMBLE, CARLYLE, 

SANDRIDGE AND RICE; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Sheriff’s Department, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:08-cv-00857-HFF) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Wanda Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & 

PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Michael J. Bogle, 

Samuel W. Outten, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v.

Greenville County, No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3918 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Disperse Yellow 64. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Disperse 

Yellow 64. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE YELLOW 64. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.48 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2014’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2031

DRUE CHICHI WALLACE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CECIL COUNTY FAIR, INC.; DON MOORE; JO ANN BASHORE; MONICA MASON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 01802

- GLR )

Submitted : September 30, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ , Circuit Judge , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Megan T. Mantzavinos, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Jeffrey W. Bredeck, ECCLESTON AND WOLF, P.C., Hanover , Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Drue Chichi Wallace appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action alleging discrimination in violation of Title II of the Civil Right Act, 4 2 U.S.C. § 2000a, civil conspiracy in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and several related causes of action under state
law for failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Wallace claimed that her removal from county fairgrounds for possession of alcohol was, in fact, based on her religion. However, she does not assert that the responsible officials knew of her religious faith, so she has not established that her removal was a pretext for discrimination. Moreover, s he contends that several of the Defendants conspired to have her removed, but again, she failed to assert that they knew of her religion. In short, she alleged no facts from which a discriminatory purpose could be inferred. Accordingly, we
affirm the dis trict court ’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §18443. Eligibility for service of individual currently serving as Administrator of NASA

The individual serving in the position of Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as of October 11, 2010, comes from civilian life and is therefore eligible to serve in such position, in conformance with section 20111 of title 51.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title XII, §1204, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2842.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 20111 of title 51" substituted for "section 202 of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2472(a))" on authority of Pub. L. 111–314, §5(e), Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3443, which Act enacted Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
### §16962. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16962 was editorially reclassified as section 20962 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.19b Director of the Division of Enforcement.

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is responsible to the Commission for supervising and conducting all enforcement activities under the acts administered by the Commission. The Director recommends the institution of administrative and injunctive actions arising out of such enforcement activities and determines the sufficiency of evidence to support the allegations in any proposed complaint. The Director supervises the Regional Directors and, in collaboration with the General Counsel, reviews cases to be recommended to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. The Director grants or denies access to nonpublic information in the Commission's enforcement files under § 240.24c-1 of this chapter; provided that access under that section shall be granted only with the concurrence of the head of the division or office responsible for the information or the files containing it.

[60 FR 14626, Mar. 20, 1995]
14910-13-1')

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fcl1cn,1 Aviation AlItninistratJn

14 CFR I'llrt 39

rDo~ket N,o. FAA-2010-0699; Ilirectoratc Identifier 2009-NM-236-ADj Amendment

l'o51() ;)..010':1.3 ',iJ

39-*****; AD i<*"'*_**_**] I

RIN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthillcss Directives; Viki

J

g Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by

Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-7 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT),

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We arc adopting a new ainvorthincss directive (AD) for the products lisle

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Viking Air Limited has completed a system safety review of the aircraft

fuel system against fuel t~nk safety standards introduced in Chapter 525 of

the Airworthiness Manua, through Notice of Proposed Amendmenl (NPA)

2002-043. The identificdln0n-compliances were then assessed using

Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to detennine if mandatory

corrective aClion is requir~d. .

The assessment showed tJat supplemental maintenance tasks would be

required to prevent potential ignition sources within the fuel system,

which could result in a fuJl tank explosion. * * *

W "th' AD I, h C d' , I care Issllmg IS to reqUIre aclions to correct t e Ullsale can than on t lese

products.

--7

INITlAlSl""

{,(~

-{Iii

!<O II.' -, lilOl

I<QUJING',","'OL.

INITIALS"J{;

IJATO
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:c326de22-917c-4517-803f-f061270172d2,g:06535374-5633-4f14-b7b2-c8ae55468eb0-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cna="http://www.cna.com/20220110" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.cna.com/20220110">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021/dei-2021.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2021" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2021/exch-2021.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220110_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220110_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cna-20220110_def.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/definitionLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPageCoverPage" roleURI="http://www.cna.com/role/CoverPageCoverPage">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Cover Page Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
### §1395w–134. Coordination requirements for plans providing prescription drug coverage

#### (a) Application of benefit coordination requirements to additional plans

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall apply the coordination requirements established under section 1395w–133(a) of this title to Rx plans described in subsection (b) in the same manner as such requirements apply to a State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program.

#### (2) Application to treatment of certain out-of-pocket expenditures

To the extent specified by the Secretary, the requirements referred to in paragraph (1) shall apply to procedures established under section 1395w–102(b)(4)(D) of this title.

#### (3) User fees

#### (A) In general

The Secretary may impose user fees for the transmittal of information necessary for benefit coordination under section 1395w–102(b)(4)(D) of this title in a manner similar to the manner in which user fees are imposed under section 1395u(h)(3)(B) of this title, except that the Secretary may retain a portion of such fees to defray the Secretary's costs in carrying out procedures under section 1395w–102(b)(4)(D) of this title.

#### (B) Application

A user fee may not be imposed under subparagraph (A) with respect to a State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program.

#### (b) Rx Plan

An Rx plan described in this subsection is any of the following:

#### (1) Medicaid programs

A State plan under subchapter XIX, including such a plan operating under a waiver under section 1315 of this title, if it meets the requirements of section 1395w–133(b)(2) of this title.

#### (2) Group health plans

An employer group health plan.

#### (3) FEHBP

The Federal employees health benefits plan under chapter 89 of title 5.

#### (4) Military coverage (including TRICARE)

Coverage under chapter 55 of title 10.

#### (5) Other prescription drug coverage

Such other health benefit plans or programs that provide coverage or financial assistance for the purchase or provision of prescription drug coverage on behalf of part D eligible individuals as the Secretary may specify.

#### (c) Relation to other provisions

#### (1) Use of cost management tools

The requirements of this section shall not impair or prevent a PDP sponsor or MA organization from applying cost management tools (including differential payments) under all methods of operation.

#### (2) No affect 1 on treatment of certain out-of-pocket expenditures

The requirements of this section shall not affect the application of the procedures established under section 1395w–102(b)(4)(D) of this title.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1860D–24, as added Pub. L. 108–173, title I, §101(a)(2), Dec. 8, 2003, 117 Stat. 2130.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "effect".
COASTAL PETE PROSPECT
                            SAID TO HAVE 2.19 BILLION
                             BARRELS OF OIL IN PLACE


         APALACHICOLA,  FL, August 27, 1997 -- Coastal  Petroleum  Company today
advised the State that its petroleum  consultants  have  evaluated the Company's
most  promising  drilling  prospect,  offshore St.  George Island in the Florida
Panhandle region, and have estimated the structure contains 2.19 billion barrels
of oil in-place.

         Using a conservative  recovery factor,  the prospect's  recoverable oil
reserves have been calculated at 546 million barrels, the Company said.

         Phillip W. Ware, president, said a public hearing on Coastal's drilling
permit  application  is  scheduled  to begin on  September  29, and that the St.
George reserve  estimates will be presented at that hearing.  He also noted that
the Company's petroleum consultants will give testimony there.

         "If the St. George Island  prospect is validated by drilling,  it would
become the largest U.S. discovery ever made east of the Mississippi," said Ware.
"But it is evident that the State is doing everything  it can to prevent Coastal
from  obtaining a drilling  permit.  Moreover,  as in any  exploration  venture,
drilling may not establish commercially viable quantities of oil or gas."

                                    - more -


<PAGE>


         Ware further noted that the  projected  cost of drilling the St. George
Island  prospect,  approximately  $5 million,  would make it  necessary  for the
Company to seek a partner or raise additional capital.

         Coastal,  which has a 425  mile-long,  880,000 acre offshore  leasehold
along the Gulf Coast,  has been seeking to drill the St. George Island  prospect
for the past five years in the face of unremitting opposition from the State.

         Two previous  attempts to impose exorbitant surety bond requirements on
the Company have been invalidated by the Florida Supreme Court.  On September 9,
however,  the governor  and cabinet are  expected to set a new surety  amount of
approximately  $4 billion as a precondition for the issuance of a permit under a
1997 statute aimed solely at Coastal.

         Ware  said  the  Company   contends  the  new  law  cannot  be  applied
retroactively to Coastal,  and that $4 billion cannot, in any case, be deemed to
be "reasonable" as required by the statute.  He also expressed the view that the
surety bond issue probably will have to be resolved by the Court.

         Coastal  Petroleum  Company is a  majority-held  subsidiary  of Coastal
Caribbean  Oils & Minerals,  Ltd.  (Boston:  CCO-B; CCO-BN).




                   Contact: Phillip W. Ware, at (904) 653-2732
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: June 19, 2014 Call with Arkansas state agencies regarding the Proposed Carbon 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was made by EPA to the Arkansas state agencies and the attendees listed 

below on June 19, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, 

which was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES

Participants: Collette Honorable, Chair of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and Eddy 

Moore (APSC) and Theresa Marks, Secretary of the Arkansas Department of Environmental 

Quality and Stuart Spencer (ADEQ)

EPA Participants: Wren Stenger, Clovis Steib, Terry Johnson, and Rob Lawrence (Region 6) 

and Janet McCabe, Joe Goffman, Brian Fisher, Reid Harvey, and Kristen Bremer (OAR)
#### § 18.01 Interest in or control of several accounts.

If any trader holds, has a financial interest in or controls positions in more than one account, whether carried with the same or with different futures commission merchants or foreign brokers, all such positions and accounts shall be considered as a single account for the purpose of determining whether such trader has a reportable position and, unless instructed otherwise in the special call to report under § 18.00 for the purpose of reporting.

[74 FR 12191, Mar. 23, 2009]