alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 21, 2006       /s/ Wayne A. Pratt Wayne A. Pratt    Chief Financial Officer
#### §§ 239.145-239.199 [Reserved]
#### § 210.2-04 Examination of financial statements of persons other than the registrant.

If a registrant is required to file financial statements of any other person, such statements need not be examined if examination of such statements would not be required if such person were itself a registrant.
§ 230.408 Additional information. ( a ) In addition to the information expressly required to be included in a registration statement, there shall be added such further material information, if any, as may be necessary to make the required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, unless otherwise required to be included in the registration statement, the failure to include in a registration statement information included in a free writing prospectus will not, solely by virtue of inclusion of the information in a free writing prospectus (as defined in Rule 405 (§ 230.405)), be considered an omission of material information required to be included in the registration statement.
[Reg. C, 12 FR 4072, June 24, 1947, as amended at 70 FR 44811, Aug. 3, 2005]
§ 165.19 Nonenforceability of certain provisions waiving rights and remedies or requiring arbitration of disputes. ( a ) *Non-waiver.* The rights and remedies provided for in this part may not be waived by any agreement, policy, form, or condition of employment, including by a predispute arbitration agreement. No predispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable if the agreement requires arbitration of a dispute arising under this part.
( b ) *Protected communications.* No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission's staff about a possible violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, including by enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement or predispute arbitration agreement with respect to such communications.
[82 FR 24501, May 30, 2017]
§ 230.162 Submission of tenders in registered exchange offers. ( a ) Notwithstanding section 5(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77e(a)), an offeror may solicit tenders of securities in an exchange offer before a registration statement is effective as to the security offered, so long as no securities are purchased until the registration statement is effective and the tender offer has expired in accordance with the tender offer rules, and either: ( 1 ) The exchange offer is subject to § 240.13e-4 or §§ 240.14d-1 through 14d-11 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) The offeror provides withdrawal rights to the same extent as would be required if the exchange offer were subject to the requirements of § 240.13e-4 or §§ 240.14d-1 through 14d-11 of this chapter; and if a material change occurs in the information published, sent or given to security holders, the offeror complies with the provisions of § 240.13e-4(e)(3) or § 240.14d-4(b) and (d) of this chapter in disseminating information about the material change to security holders, and including the minimum periods during which the offer must remain open (with withdrawal rights) after notice of the change is provided to security holders.
( b ) Notwithstanding Section 5(b)(2) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77e(b)(2)), a prospectus that meets the requirements of Section 10(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77j(a)) need not be delivered to security holders in an exchange offer that commences before the effectiveness of a registration statement in accordance with the provisions of § 230.162(a) of this section, so long as a preliminary prospectus, prospectus supplements and revised prospectuses are delivered to security holders in accordance with § 240.13e-4(e)(2) or § 240.14d-4(b) of this chapter. This applies not only to exchange offers subject to those provisions, but also to exchange offers not subject to those provisions that meet the conditions in § 230.162(a)(2) of this section.
Instruction to § 230.162 of this section:
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 230.162 of this section above, for going-private transactions (as defined by § 240.13e-3) and roll-up transactions (as described by Item 901 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.901 of this chapter)), a registration statement registering the securities to be offered must have become effective and only a prospectus that meets the requirements of Section 10(a) of the Securities Act may be delivered to security holders on the date of commencement.
[73 FR 60087, Oct. 9, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70373-70374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-04-142]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Connecticut River, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

[[Page 70374]]


ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the 
Amtrak Old Saybrook-Old Lyme Bridge, mile 3.4, across the Connecticut 
River, Connecticut. This deviation from the regulations allows the 
bridge owner to require a twelve-hour advance notice for bridge 
openings between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. from 10 p.m. on January 14, 2005 
through 10 a.m. on February 14, 2005. This deviation is necessary in 
order to facilitate necessary inspection and repairs at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from January 14, 2005 through 
February 14, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Old Saybrook-Old Lyme Bridge, at mile 
3.4, across the Connecticut River has a vertical clearance in the 
closed position of 19 feet at mean high water and 22 feet at mean low 
water. The existing drawbridge operating regulations are listed at 33 
CFR 117.205(b).
    The owner of the bridge, National Railroad Passenger Corporation 
(Amtrak), requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operating 
regulations to facilitate electrical maintenance repairs at the bridge.
    This deviation to the operating regulations allows the bridge owner 
to require at least a twelve-hour advance notice for bridge openings at 
the Old Saybrook-Old Lyme Bridge between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. from 10 p.m. 
on January 14, 2005 through 10 a.m. on February 14, 2005.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is 
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 04-26747 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Commercial
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: August 4, 2004 /s/ David Gladstone
EXHIBIT 31 

I, Nora Coccaro, chief executiveofficer and chief financial officer of Healthbridge, Inc. (“Registrant”) certifythat: 

1.              I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (“Report”) of          Registrant; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and          for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the          Registrant and have: 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated          subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly          during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)              Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual          report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially          affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s          auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or          persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over          financial reporting. 

Date: October 3, 2005 

/s/ Nora Coccaro 

Nora Cocaro, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

----
#### 20 East 74th Street, Inc., v. Esther Minskoff, as Executrix of Sam Minskoff, Deceased, et al.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Breitel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 197.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Bridger-Teton National Forest--WY--Kemmerer and Greys River 
Ranger Districts; Lincoln County, WY; Salt Pass Grazing Allotments 
Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a document in the Federal 
Register on November 15, 2004, requesting comments concerning the scope 
of the analysis be received by December 17, 2005. That document 
contained an incorrect date for submission of comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russ Bacon, Kemmerer District Ranger, 
Kemmerer Ranger District, P.O. Box 31, Kemmerer, Wyoming 83101 or phone 
(307) 877-4415.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 15, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-25249, 
on page 65578, the date for submission of comments is incorrect. The 
submission of comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be 
received by December 31, 2004 is the correct date.

    Dated: November 16, 2004.
Fred Fouse,
Acting District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 04-26374 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.30-8 [Reserved]
### §12311. Establishment of Administration on Children, Youth, and Families

#### (a) In general

There is established within the Department of Health and Human Services an Administration on Children, Youth, and Families.

#### (b) Commissioner

#### (1) Establishment

#### (A) In general

The Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, as established under subsection (a), shall be headed by a Commissioner on Children, Youth, and Families.

#### (B) Omitted

#### (2) Appointment

The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint the Commissioner.

(Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, §915, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 915 of Pub. L. 101–501. Subsec. (b)(1)(B) of section 915 of Pub. L. 101–501 amended section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.
MP5332.4 - ADVANCE PAYMENTS FOR NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS

Parent topic: MP5332 - Contract Financing

MP5332.470 Advance Payment Pool

Advance payment requests must be processed as follows:

(1) The contracting officer must compile the advance payment request package in accordance with

FAR 32.4 and DFARS 232.4 and submit it to the SCO for coordination. The SCO must submit the

request through the cognizant HCA Workflow. The cognizant HCA forwards the package to

SAF/FMF for review and approval. DAFRCO and SpRCO will submit the request directly to the

cognizant HCA, as appropriate.

(2) SAF/FMF will evaluate the request to determine if advance payments are justified. Assistance

may be solicited from other sources such as contracting officers, auditors, disbursing officers, and, if

necessary, field visits to the contractor or institution. For nonprofit educational or research

institutions, SAF/FMF will determine if approved advance payments will be disbursed from an

advance payment pool in accordance with DFARS 232.470. When approved, SAF/FMF will forward

the findings, determinations, and authorization for advance payments and/or the advance payment

pool agreement to the responsible contracting officer. The contracting officer must ensure all

applicable advance payment clauses are incorporated into each contract. The clause at DFARS

252.232-7000, Advance Payment Pool, must be incorporated into each contract that is covered by

the agreement.

(3) The Department of the Air Force accounting and finance office is responsible for the disbursing

functions of the advance payment pool agreement.
### §16811. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section, Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §621, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2935, related to commercial technology transfer program. See section 50116 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51108 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR HOLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-98-CR-107-18

-------------------- March 22, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Holguin appeals his conviction and sentence following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of several counts of drug and money laundering offenses. Holguin first argues that the district court erred in grouping his offenses. The district court did not commit plain error on this issue, as the offenses all threatened the same societal interest. See U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2. Holguin’s secondNo. 98-51108 -2- argument is that the district court erred in increasing his offense level for his role in the offense. The district court did not so err, as trial testimony showed that at least five persons were involved in the offense and that Holguin managed and supervised at least one of them. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1. Holguin’s third and final argument is that the district court erred in failing to dismiss one count of the indictment as multiplicitous, as it involved the same substantive offense for which Holguin was punished in a prior count. The district court did not err in not dismissing the allegedly multiplicitous count. The counts of which Holguin complains involve the conspiracy to commit money laundering and the substantive offense of money laundering. “[A] substantive crime and a conspiracy to commit that crime are not the same for double jeopardy purposes.” United States v. Brown , 29 F.3d 953, 957. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.310 Specific exemptions. ( a ) Pursuant to, and limited by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the following systems of records maintained by the Commission are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I), and (f), and §§ 200.303, 200.305, and 200.307, insofar as they contain investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes: ( 1 ) Enforcement Files;
( 2 ) Office of the General Counsel Working Files;
( 3 ) Office of the Chief Accountant Working Files;
( 4 ) Correspondence Response System;
( 5 ) Tips, Complaints, and Referrals (TCR) Records; and
( 6 ) SEC Security in the Workplace Incident Records.
( b ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the systems of records containing the Commission's Disciplinary and Adverse Actions, Employee Conduct, and Labor Relations Files are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f), and §§ 200.303 through 200.309, insofar as they contain investigatory material compiled to determine an individual's suitability, eligibility, and qualifications for Federal civilian employment or access to classified information, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to September 27, 1975, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.
#### Ida M. Heiser, Respondent, v. Henry W. Keitzel et al., as Trustees of the International Railway Co., et al., Appellants.

Present —

Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
### §12625. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1515, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1528

Section, Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §165, formerly §195N, as added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1092(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2532; renumbered §165 and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §104(b), title IV, §402(b)(1), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 840, 918, directed the Corporation to ensure that no amounts appropriated under section 12681 of this title be utilized to carry out this division.

Section was formerly classified to section 12653n of this title prior to renumbering by section 104(b) of Pub. L. 103–82.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
#### § 171.20 [Reserved]