alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 227.205 Promoter compensation. ( a ) An issuer, or person acting on behalf of the issuer, shall be permitted to compensate or commit to compensate, directly or indirectly, any person to promote the issuer's offerings made in reliance on section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)) through communication channels provided by an intermediary on the intermediary's platform, but only if the issuer or person acting on behalf of the issuer, takes reasonable steps to ensure that the person promoting the offering clearly discloses the receipt, past or prospective, of such compensation with any such communication. *Instruction to paragraph (a).* The disclosure required by this paragraph is required, with each communication, for persons engaging in promotional activities on behalf of the issuer through the communication channels provided by the intermediary, regardless of whether or not the compensation they receive is specifically for the promotional activities. This includes persons hired specifically to promote the offering as well as to persons who are otherwise employed by the issuer or who undertake promotional activities on behalf of the issuer.
( b ) Other than as set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, an issuer or person acting on behalf of the issuer shall not compensate or commit to compensate, directly or indirectly, any person to promote the issuer's offerings made in reliance on section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)), unless such promotion is limited to notices permitted by, and in compliance with, § 227.204.
§ 227.502 Insignificant deviations from a term, condition or requirement of this part (Regulation Crowdfunding). ( a ) A failure to comply with a term, condition, or requirement of this part will not result in the loss of the exemption from the requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77e) for any offer or sale to a particular individual or entity, if the issuer relying on the exemption shows: ( 1 ) The failure to comply was insignificant with respect to the offering as a whole;
( 2 ) The issuer made a good faith and reasonable attempt to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of this part; and
( 3 ) The issuer did not know of such failure where the failure to comply with a term, condition or requirement of this part was the result of the failure of the intermediary to comply with the requirements of section 4A(a) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d-1(a)) and the related rules, or such failure by the intermediary occurred solely in offerings other than the issuer's offering.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not preclude the Commission from bringing an enforcement action seeking any appropriate relief for an issuer's failure to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of this part.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-81,814-03

EX P ARTE JASON PA UL ZENO, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F -2002-1700- E IN THE 367 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DENTON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sente nced to f

ive year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. On October 7, 205, this Court rema nded this application to the trial court for finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. On November 20, 2015, the trial court signe d finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that wer e based on the aff idavits from counsel. The trial court rec ommended that relief be denie d. Ba sed on the trial court’s finding s of fac t as well as this Court’s independe nt review of the2

entire rec ord, we deny reli ef o n al l grounds raised, including the supplemental g rounds raised by Applicant in the trial c ourt on August 18, 2015. Filed: January

27, 2016 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--MPLS and Frame Relay Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 23, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), MPLS and Frame Relay 
Alliance (``MFA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: MPLS and 
Frame Relay Alliance, Fremont, CA. The nature and scope of MFA's 
standards development activities are: (1) Serving as a meeting ground 
for companies that are creating and deploying products that implement 
MPLS, or services that depend on the capabilities introduced by MPLS 
and its associated technologies; (2) identifying, selecting, 
augmenting, as appropriate, and publishing MPLS implementation 
agreements drawn from appropriate national and international, defacto, 
and dejure standards; (3) identifying, selecting, augmenting, as 
appropriate, and publishing frame relay implementation agreements drawn 
from appropriate national and international, defacto, and dejure 
standards; (4) promoting/fostering the measurement, demonstration and 
testing of frame relay products in order to further compatibility and 
interoperability; (5) conducting cooperative research; (6) developing 
proposals to be made to appropriate national and international 
standards bodies in order to further system compatibility and 
interoperability; and (7) developing publications and informational 
materials. ``Implementation agreement(s)'' shall mean specifications, 
protocols, system architectures and other similar guidelines related to 
multi-protocol label switching and/or frame relay technologies that may 
be developed, adopted, published or otherwise made available to the 
public by the Corporation.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26204 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1317

ISSAC OLUFEMI FAWEHINMI, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A71-793-111) Submitted: July 30, 1999 Decided: September 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diane McHugh-Martinez, LAW OFFICE OF MCHUGH-MARTINEZ, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, David M. McConnell, Assistant Director, H. BradfordGlassman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Isaac Olufemi Fawehinmi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ opinion and orderdismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. An immigration judge ordered Fawehinmi deported in absentia after Fawehinmi failed to appear for his deportation hearing. Fawehinmi alleges that he did not receive proper notice of the hearing and that the immigration judge abused his discretion by denying his motion to reopen. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based on substantial evidence and is without reversible error. See In re Fawehinmi , No. A71-793-111 (B.I.A. Feb. 12, 1999). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 300.29 Garments or products composed of or containing miscellaneous cloth scraps. ( a ) For wool products which consist of, or are made from, miscellaneous cloth scraps comprising manufacturing by-products and containing various fibers of undetermined percentages, the following form of disclosure as to fiber content of such wool products, where truthfully appliable and with appropriate percentage figure inserted, may be used in the stamp, tag, label, or mark of identification of such product: ( 1 ) Where the product contains chiefly cotton as well as woolen fibers in the minimum percentage designated for recycled wool: Made of Miscellaneous Cloth Scraps Composed Chiefly of Cotton With Minimum of ____% Recycled Wool.
( 2 ) Where the product contains chiefly rayon as well as woolen fibers in the minimum percentage designated for recycled wool: Made of Miscellaneous Cloth Scraps Composed Chiefly of Rayon With Minimum of ____% Recycled Wool.
( 3 ) Where the product is composed chiefly of a mixture of cotton and rayon as well as woolen fibers in the minimum percentage designated for recycled wool: Made of Miscellaneous Cloth Scraps Composed Chiefly of Cotton and Rayon With Minimum of ____% Recycled Wool.
( 4 ) Where the product contains chiefly woolen fibers with the balance of undetermined mixtures of cotton, rayon or other non-woolen fibers: Made of Miscellaneous Cloth Scraps Containing Cotton, Rayon and Other Non-Woolen Fibers, With Minimum of ____% Recycled Wool.
( b ) Where the cotton or rayon content or the non-woolen fiber content mentioned in such forms of disclosure is not known to comprise as much as 50% of the fiber content of the product, the word “chiefly” in the respective form of disclosure specified in this section shall be omitted.
( c ) The words “Contents are” may be used in the above-mentioned forms of marking in lieu of the words “Made of” where appropriate to the nature of the product.
( d ) For purposes of this rule, undetermined or unascertained amounts of wool or recycled wool which may be contained in the product may be classified and designated as recycled wool.
[6 FR 3426, July 15, 1941, as amended at 45 FR 44262, July 1, 1980]
#### Noel Baker, Appellant, v David Baker, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[821 NYS2d 523]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, A.J.), entered January 18, 2006 in a divorce action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to reconsider the previously determined equitable distribution of the marital property.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is dismissed without costs *(see Hutchings v Hutchings,*155 AD2d 973 [1989]).

All concur, Hayes, J., not participating. Present — Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
§ 303.41 Use of fiber trademarks and generic names in advertising. ( a ) In advertising textile fiber products, the use of a fiber trademark or a generic fiber name shall require a full disclosure of the fiber content information required by the Act and regulations in at least one instance in the advertisement.
( b ) Where a fiber trademark is used in advertising textile fiber products containing more than one fiber, other than permissible ornamentation, such fiber trademark and the generic name of the fiber must appear in the required fiber content information in immediate proximity and conjunction with each other in plainly legible type or lettering of equal size and conspicuousness.
( c ) Where a fiber trademark is used in advertising textile fiber products containing only one fiber, other than permissive ornamentation, such fiber trademark and the generic name of the fiber must appear in immediate proximity and conjunction with each other in plainly legible and conspicuous type or lettering at least once in the advertisement.
( d ) Where a fiber trademark or generic name is used in non-required information in advertising, such fiber trademark or generic name, shall not be used in such a manner as to be false, deceptive, or misleading as to fiber content, or to indicate, directly or indirectly, that a textile fiber product is composed wholly or in part of a particular fiber, when such is not the case.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 79 FR 18774, Apr. 4, 2014]
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Megless, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.By: /s/MICHAEL M. MEGLESS
#### § 239.20 Form S-20, for standardized options.

This form may be used to register standardized options under the Securities Act of 1933 where the issuer undertakes not to issue, clear, guarantee or accept an option registered on Form S-20 unless there is a definitive options disclosure document meeting the requirements of Rule 9b-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

[47 FR 41955, Sept. 23, 1982]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting Form S-20, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: R o n ke O l ley a n d Jeff Olle y v. Dr i f twood Ho s p i t a l it y M gt II
LLC, Mana ger of H y a tt Ho u se H o u sto n / E n e r gy C o rr i d or
Te x a s

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 8 8 9

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 05 7 68 7

Trial court: C ounty Ci v i l C o u rt at L a w N o

. 3 of Harris County

On October 16, 2015, appellants, R o n ke O l ley a n d Jeff Olle y , proceeding pro se
, filed an affidavit of indigence for appellate costs in the trial court with their notice of appeal from the final judgment in the above

- referenced trial court proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(a)(2)

, (c)(1). On November 13, 2015, appellants filed a notice in this Court that the trial court had signed an order denying the county clerk’s contest to their
affidavit on November 4, 2015. See id. (e)(1), (i)(4), (j)(5). Also o n November 13 , 2015,

the trial clerk filed an original clerk’s record in this C ourt with, among other things, the

trial court’s judgment and order, signed on November 4 , 2015, denying the county clerk’s contest to appellant s ’ affidavit. See id. 20.1(e)(1), (i)(4). An order overruling a contest to an affidavit of indigence is not su bject to appellate review. See id. 20.1(j)(5). Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit of indigence are deemed true, and appellants are entitled to proceed without advance payment of appellate costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. at 20.1(f). Because the court reporter filed an information sheet on October 20, 2015, stating that no reporter’s record was taken, and the clerk’s record was already

filed on November 13, 2015, t he Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the appellant s indigent and th at t he y are allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs for purposes of the appellate filing fee and the clerk’s record fee.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 ng for the Court

Date: December 15, 2015
#### § 204.44 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs.

Charges may be assessed for interest, penalties, and administrative costs in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards, 31 CFR 901.9.

[58 FR 38520, July 19, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54132, Oct. 26, 2001]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph Frattaroli, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of     the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: July 20, 2004

 
| By:                     | /s/ Joseph Frattaroli |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.47
                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                   TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF
                     WASTE ROCK FROM THE JOHNSON CAMP MINE"

This document is an amendment ("Amendment") to the "Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Waste Rock from the Johnson Camp Mine" dated December 23, 2004
("Agreement") between Nord Resources Corporation ("Seller") and JC Rock, LLC
("Purchaser").

A) Seller and Purchaser hereby agree to extend the term of the Agreement from
October 1, 2005 to February 28, 2006. The Agreement may also be extended by
special arrangement on specific contracts at the sole option of the Seller.

B) Seller hereby agrees to reduce the royalty from $1.50 per ton to $1.00 per
ton on fines and rock sold by Purchaser to individuals or companies where the
sales price to such individuals or companies is less than $6.00 per ton, FOB
Johnson Camp.

C) Purchaser hereby acknowledges that the Agreement is non-exclusive and hereby
reaffirms Seller's right to sell Johnson Camp rock that is not in Purchaser's
inventory to any individual or company during the term of the Agreement.

Dated September 30, 2005

NORD RESOURCES CORPORATION              JC ROCK, LLC


By: /s/ Kathy Glidewell                 By: /s/ James L. Rodman
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
#### § 170.12 Delegation of Authority to Director of the Market Participants Division.

The Commission hereby delegates, until the Commission orders otherwise, to the Director of the Market Participants Division the authority to take any of the actions enumerated in §§ 170.11 (b) and (c). Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if the Director believes it appropriate, he may submit the matter to the Commission for its consideration.

[44 FR 20651, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 67 FR 62353, Oct. 7, 2002; 78 FR 22419, Apr. 16, 2013; 89 FR 71820, Sept. 4, 2024]
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2019-B Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 

Date: June 29, 2023 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)**