alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 3424.1—Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 3424—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

3424.103 Procedures.

(a) If the Privacy Act of 1974 (Privacy Act) applies to a contract, the contracting officer must specify

in the contract the disposition to be made of the system or systems of records upon completion of

performance. For example, the contract may require the contractor to completely destroy the

records, to remove personal identifiers, to turn the records over to ED, or to keep the records but

take certain measures to keep the records confidential and protect the individual's privacy.

(b) If a notice of the system of records has not been published in the Federal Register , the

contracting officer may proceed with the acquisition but must not award the contract until the notice

is published, unless the contracting officer determines, in writing, that portions of the contract may

proceed without maintaining information subject to the Privacy Act. In this case, the contracting

officer may—

(1) Award the contract, authorizing performance only of those portions not subject to the Privacy

Act; and

(2) After the notice is published and effective, authorize performance of the remainder of the

contract.

3424.170 Protection of human subjects.

In this section, research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing

and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. (34 CFR 97.102(d))

Research is considered to involve human subjects when a researcher obtains information about a

living individual through intervention or interaction with the individual or obtains personally

identifiable private information about an individual. Some categories of research are exempt in

accordance with 34 CFR part 97.

(a) The contracting officer must insert the provision in 3452.224–71 (Notice about research activities

involving human subjects) in any solicitation where a resultant contract will include, or is likely to

include, research activities involving human subjects covered under 34 CFR part 97.

(b) The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.224–72 (Research activities involving

human subjects) in any solicitation that includes the provision in 3452.224–71 (Notice about

research activities involving human subjects) and in any resultant contract.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 319]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4436]]

Public Law 115-319
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    120 12th Street Lobby in Columbus, Georgia, as the ``Richard W. 
    Williams, Jr., Chapter of the Triple Nickles (555th P.I.A.) Post 
             Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2018 -  [S. 3237]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RICHARD W. WILLIAMS, JR., CHAPTER OF THE TRIPLE NICKLES 
                              (555TH P.I.A.) POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 12th Street Lobby in Columbus, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Richard W. Williams, Jr., Chapter of the Triple 
Nickles (555th P.I.A.) Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard W. 
Williams, Jr., Chapter of the Triple Nickles (555th P.I.A.) Post 
Office''.

    Approved December 14, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3237:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 11, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3870 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Nicky ‘Nick’ Daniel Bacon Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3870 EH

1 SECTION 1. NICKY ‘‘NICK’’ DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose 

4 Bud, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Nicky ‘Nick’ Daniel Bacon Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Nicky ‘Nick’ Daniel 

10 Bacon Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3870 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBacon Post Office’’. Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Nicky ‘Nick’ Daniel al Service located at 6083 Highway 36 West in
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.13d-4 Disclaimer of beneficial ownership.

Any person may expressly declare in any statement filed that the filing of such statement shall not be construed as an admission that such person is, for the purposes of sections 13(d) or 13(g) of the Act, the beneficial owner of any securities covered by the statement.

(Secs. 3(b), 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), 13(d)(5), 13(d)(6), 14(d)(1), 23; 48 Stat. 882, 894, 895, 901; sec. 203(a), 49 Stat. 704, sec. 8, 49 Stat. 1379; sec. 10, 78 Stat. 88a; secs. 2, 3, 82 Stat. 454, 455; secs. 1, 2, 3-5, 84 Stat. 1497; secs. 3, 18, 89 Stat. 97, 155 (15 U.S.C. 78c(b), 78m(d)(1), 89m(d)(2), 78m(d)(5), 78m(d)(6), 78n(d)(1), 78w)
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12b-14 Riders; inserts.

Riders shall not be used. If the statement or report is typed on a printed form, and the space provided for the answer to any given item is insufficient, reference shall be made in such space to a full insert page or pages on which the item number and caption and the complete answer are given.

(Secs. 4, 16, 19, 24, 48 Stat. 77, 896, 85, as amended, 901; 15 U.S.C. 77d, 78p, 77s, 78x)

[30 FR 2023, Feb. 13, 1965]
### §18363. Disposition of orbiter vehicles

#### (a) In general

Upon the termination of the Space Shuttle program as provided in section 18362 of this title, the Administrator shall decommission any remaining Space Shuttle orbiter vehicles according to established safety and historic preservation procedures prior to their designation as surplus government property. The orbiter vehicles shall be made available and located for display and maintenance through a competitive procedure established pursuant to the disposition plan developed under section 613(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17761(a)),1 with priority consideration given to eligible applicants meeting all conditions of that plan which would provide for the display and maintenance of orbiters at locations with the best potential value to the public, including where the location of the orbiters can advance educational opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines, and with an historical relationship with either the launch, flight operations, or processing of the Space Shuttle orbiters or the retrieval of NASA manned space vehicles, or significant contributions to human space flight. The Smithsonian Institution, which, as of October 11, 2001, houses the Space Shuttle Enterprise, shall determine any new location for the Enterprise.

#### (b) Display and maintenance

The orbiter vehicles made available under subsection (a) shall be displayed and maintained through agreements and procedures established pursuant to section 613(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17761(a)).1

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to NASA such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section. The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this subsection shall be in addition to any amounts authorized to be appropriated by title I, and may be requested by the President as supplemental requirements, if needed, in the appropriate fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 111–267, title VI, §603, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2829.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 613(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is section 613(a) of Pub. L. 110–422, formerly classified to section 17761(a) of this title, which was transferred and is set out as a note under section 70501 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Title I, referred to in subsec. (c), is title I of Pub. L. 111–267, Oct. 11, 2010, 124 Stat. 2809, which is not classified to the Code.

1 See References in Text note below.
RlN 2120-AA64



### 14CFR Part 39 ~ .{491o-13-P)

# =_slv;;ol DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 

# o(Pqq (Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-236-AD]

I Airwortbiness Directives; Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, inc.) Model DHC-7 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulernaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify ( .C-f..N...--

~~ and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe b

# /'0 I

# 0 IIQtn 'NO::SYMOOI. condition as: Viking Air Limited has completed a system safety review ofthe aircraft fuel system against fuel tank safety standArds introduced in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Noticel ofProposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified non-compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to determine ifmandatory corrective action is required. The assessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks would be required to prevent potential ignition sources within the fuel system, which could result in afuel tank explosion. '"'" '"
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described inthe MCAl.~"O!""w"".•• 14910-13-PI

~~'~~>7~-R D~PARTMENT OFTRANSPORT AnON Federal AvhltioD Administration 

### (,/&0/10 14CFR Part 39 ANE-171 

### (DocketNo.FAA-201o-***"*; 

### Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-236-ADI RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directivesj Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-7 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. """"""S "lICK, ANE·170

• ""Ii 

### ",'''<,, information (MCAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation prI

'duct. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Viking Air Limited has completed asysten safety review oftbe aircrafi Cuelsystem against fuel tank safety standJrds introduced inChapter 525 oC the Airworthiness Manual through NoticelofProposed Amendment (NPA) 2002~043 The identified non-compliances were then assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-dol, to detcmlinc ifmandatory corrective act.ionisrequired. listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing ulrworthincss ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). 

# -G , SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products ;{ ZP':.O

The assessment showed that supplementaf maintenance tasks would be required to prevent potential ignition sourtes within the fuel system. which could result in afuel tank explosiorL '"

### *•
The proposed AD would require actions l..hat are intended to address the unsaCecondition described inthe MCAL
No: 13-090 October 28, 2013

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Discuss Cumulative Effects of Regulation,

Risk Prioritization in Rockville Nov. 6

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Nov. 6 in Rockville, Md., 

to discuss the agency’s effort to account for the combined effect of multiple regulatory actions and an 

initiative to prioritize nuclear power plant activities based on potential risk reduction. 

The Commission recently directed the staff to continue efforts aimed at ensuring the agency can 

“consider more completely the overall impacts of multiple regulatory actions on licensees and their 

ability to focus effectively on items of greatest safety import.” The Commission also directed the staff 

to include opinions from those interested in the topic, write up any recommendations and report them to 

the Commission by March 2015. The Commission also directed the staff to propose ways that U.S. 

nuclear power plants could prioritize “the implementation of regulatory actions as an integrated set and 

in a way that reflects their risk significance on a plant-specific basis.”

The meeting will be held in Room 8A28 of the NRC’s Three White Flint building at 11601 

Landsdown St. in Rockville from 8 a.m.-1 p.m. The meeting will cover the staff’s latest efforts on both 

issues, as well as an industry proposal on risk prioritization. The staff expects industry and public 

interest groups to comment on both topics and the public is invited to take part in the discussion. 

Seating will be limited at the meeting, which will include teleconference and webinar access. 

For details, contact Tim Reed at 301-415-1462 or timothy.reed@nrc.gov by Oct. 31 to ensure enough 

resources are available.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Raimondi, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Schrader, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 528]

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), imposed February 3, 2006, upon his prior conviction of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing *(see People v Schrader,*23 AD3d 585, 585-586 [2005]).

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305-306 [1981]; *People v Santiago,*274 AD2d 438 [2000]; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 86 [1982]).

In remitting this matter for resentencing, this Court specifically directed the County Court to resentence the defendant because “[t]he sentencing court’s remarks demonstrated that it improperly considered crimes of which the defendant was acquitted as a basis for sentencing” *(People v Schrader, supra*at 585-586). Upon resentencing, the County Court did not take into account any of the crimes of which the defendant was acquitted. Rather, the resentence imposed was proper under the circumstances of this case *(see People v Farrar,*supra;*People v Santiago, supra; People v Suitte, supra).*Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
§ 201.510 Temporary cease-and-desist orders: Application process. ( a ) *Procedure.* A request for entry of a temporary cease-and-desist order shall be made by application filed by the Division of Enforcement. The application shall set forth the statutory provision or rule that each respondent is alleged to have violated; the temporary relief sought against each respondent, including whether the respondent would be required to take action to prevent the dissipation or conversion of assets; and whether the relief is sought *ex parte.*
( b ) *Accompanying documents.* The application shall be accompanied by a declaration of facts signed by a person with knowledge of the facts contained therein, a memorandum of points and authorities, a proposed order imposing the temporary relief sought, and, unless relief is sought *ex parte,* a proposed notice of hearing and order to show cause whether the temporary relief should be imposed. If a proceeding for a permanent cease-and-desist order has not already been commenced, a proposed order instituting proceedings to determine whether a permanent cease-and-desist order should be imposed shall also be filed with the application.
( c ) *With whom filed.* The application shall be filed with the Secretary or, if the Secretary is unavailable, with the duty officer. In no event shall an application be filed with an administrative law judge.
( d ) *Record of proceedings.* Hearings, including *ex parte* presentations made by the Division of Enforcement pursuant to § 201.513, shall be recorded or transcribed pursuant to § 201.302.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4918]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rembrandt's Late Religious Portraits''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Rembrandt's Late Religious 
Portraits,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owners. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC from on or about January 30, 2005 to on 
or about May 1, 2005, the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA from on 
or about June 7, 2005, to on or about August 28, 2005, and at possible 
additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. 
Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 
202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 1, 2004.
C. Miller Crouch
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-26823 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
§ 23.401 Definitions. ( a ) *Counterparty.* The term “counterparty,” as appropriate in this subpart, includes any person who is a prospective counterparty to a swap.
( b ) *Major swap participant.* The term “major swap participant” means any person defined in Section 1a(33) of the Act and § 1.3 of this chapter and, as appropriate in this subpart, any person acting for or on behalf of a major swap participant, including an associated person defined in Section 1a(4) of the Act.
( c ) *Special Entity.* The term “Special Entity” means: ( 1 ) A Federal agency;
( 2 ) A State, State agency, city, county, municipality, other political subdivision of a State, or any instrumentality, department, or a corporation of or established by a State or political subdivision of a State;
( 3 ) Any employee benefit plan subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002);
( 4 ) Any governmental plan, as defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002);
( 5 ) Any endowment, including an endowment that is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)); or
( 6 ) Any employee benefit plan defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002), not otherwise defined as a Special Entity, that elects to be a Special Entity by notifying a swap dealer or major swap participant of its election prior to entering into a swap with the particular swap dealer or major swap participant.
( d ) *Swap dealer.* The term “swap dealer” means any person defined in Section 1a(49) of the Act and § 1.3 of this chapter and, as appropriate in this subpart, any person acting for or on behalf of a swap dealer, including an associated person defined in Section 1a(4) of the Act.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0063]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Voluntary Registration of Cosmetic 
Product Establishments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Voluntary Registration of Cosmetic 
Product Establishments'' has been approved by the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 19, 2004 (69 
FR 43001), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0027. 
The approval expires on November 30, 2007. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 19, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26332 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
### §14212. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10204(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 702

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXI, §310002, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2105, related to conforming reduction in discretionary spending limits.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00196-CR

Jesse Riojas Beltran

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CR13-0658)

August 6, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_____________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth