alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §16452. Federal access to books and records

#### (a) In general

Each holding company and each associate company thereof shall maintain, and shall make available to the Commission, such books, accounts, memoranda, and other records as the Commission determines are relevant to costs incurred by a public utility or natural gas company that is an associate company of such holding company and necessary or appropriate for the protection of utility customers with respect to jurisdictional rates.

#### (b) Affiliate companies

Each affiliate of a holding company or of any subsidiary company of a holding company shall maintain, and shall make available to the Commission, such books, accounts, memoranda, and other records with respect to any transaction with another affiliate, as the Commission determines are relevant to costs incurred by a public utility or natural gas company that is an associate company of such holding company and necessary or appropriate for the protection of utility customers with respect to jurisdictional rates.

#### (c) Holding company systems

The Commission may examine the books, accounts, memoranda, and other records of any company in a holding company system, or any affiliate thereof, as the Commission determines are relevant to costs incurred by a public utility or natural gas company within such holding company system and necessary or appropriate for the protection of utility customers with respect to jurisdictional rates.

#### (d) Confidentiality

No member, officer, or employee of the Commission shall divulge any fact or information that may come to his or her knowledge during the course of examination of books, accounts, memoranda, or other records as provided in this section, except as may be directed by the Commission or by a court of competent jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1264, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 974.)
§ 190.14 Operation of the estate of the debtor subsequent to the filing date. ( a ) *Proofs of claim.* The trustee may, in its discretion based upon the facts and circumstances of the case, instruct each customer to file a proof of claim containing such information as is deemed appropriate by the trustee, and seek a court order establishing a bar date for the filing of such proofs of claim.
( b ) *Operation of the derivatives clearing organization.* Subsequent to the order for relief, the derivatives clearing organization shall cease making calls for variation settlement or initial margin.
( c ) *Liquidation.* ( 1 ) The trustee shall liquidate all open commodity contracts that have not been terminated, liquidated, or transferred no later than seven calendar days after entry of the order for relief. Such liquidation of open commodity contracts shall be conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures of the debtor, to the extent applicable and practicable.
( 2 ) In lieu of liquidating securities held by the debtor and making distributions in the form of cash, the trustee may, in its reasonable discretion, make distributions in the form of securities that are equivalent (*i.e.,* securities of the same class and series of an issuer) to the securities originally delivered to the debtor by a clearing member or such clearing member's customer.
( d ) *Computation of funded balance.* The trustee shall use reasonable efforts to compute a funded balance for each customer account immediately prior to any distribution of property within the account, which shall be as accurate as reasonably practicable under the circumstances, including the reliability and availability of information.
§ 232.501 Modular submissions and segmented filings. An electronic filer may use the following procedures to submit information to the EDGAR system for subsequent inclusion in an electronic filing: ( a ) *Modular submissions.* ( 1 ) One or more electronic format documents may be submitted for storage in the non-public EDGAR data storage area as a modular submission for subsequent inclusion in one or more electronic submissions.
( 2 ) An electronic filer shall be permitted a maximum of ten modular submissions in the non-public EDGAR data storage area at any time, not to exceed a total of one megabyte of digital information. If an electronic filer attempts to submit a modular filing which would cause either of these limits to be exceeded, EDGAR will suspend the modular submission and notify the electronic filer by electronic mail. After six business days, the modular submission held in suspense will be deleted from the system.
( 3 ) A modular submission may be corrected or amended only by resubmitting the entire modular submission.
( b ) *Segmented filings.* ( 1 ) Segments of a document intended to become an electronic filing may be submitted to the non-public EDGAR data storage area for assembly as a segmented filing.
( 2 ) Segments shall be submitted no more than six business days in advance of the anticipated filing date and are not limited in number or size. They may be submitted from several geographic locations by more than one filing entity. Segments may be included in only one electronic filing. Once used, segments will be removed from the non-public EDGAR data storage area. The assembly of segments into a segmented filing shall be effected pursuant to the applicable provisions of the EDGAR Filer Manual. If segments are not prepared in accordance with the EDGAR Filer Manual, the filing will not be constructed. The filing date of a segmented filing shall be the date upon which the filing is assembled and satisfies the requirements of Rule 13(a) of Regulation S-T (§ 232.13(a)).
( 3 ) Segments may be corrected or amended only by resubmitting the entire segment.
( c ) A modular submission or segment shall not: ( 1 ) be publicly available;
( 2 ) Be deemed filed with the Commission for purposes of Securities Act section 11 (15 U.S.C. 77k), Exchange Act section 18 (15 U.S.C. 78r), Trust Indenture Act section 323 (15 U.S.C. 77www), or Investment Company Act section 34(b) (15 U.S.C. 80a-33(b)) prior to its inclusion in a filing; or
( 3 ) Be deemed to constitute an official filing prior to its inclusion in a filing under the federal securities laws. Once a modular submission or segment has been included in an electronic filing, the liability and anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the Trust Indenture Act, and the Investment Company Act shall apply to the electronic filing.
[58 FR 14670, Mar. 18, 1993; 58 FR 21349, Apr. 21, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 24801, Apr. 27, 2000; 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report:  February 4, 1999





                             THE COASTAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




                Delaware                                        74-1734212
         (State of incorporation                             (I.R.S. Employer
            or organization)                                Identification No.)


              Coastal Tower
           Nine Greenway Plaza
             Houston, Texas                                     77046-0995
(Address of principal executive offices)                        (Zip Code)


================================================================================


<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events.

         On January 26, 1999, the Company issued a press release regarding
earnings for the quarter and the year ended December 31, 1998. See press release
attached as Exhibit 99.1.

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

         (c)  Exhibits. The following document is filed as an exhibit to
this current report.

              99.1  Press release issued January 26, 1998, entitled "Coastal
                    Posts Record 1998 Earnings."



                                    SIGNATURE

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                                  THE COASTAL CORPORATION
                                                         (Registrant)



Date: February 4, 1999                  By:      /S/ AUSTIN M. O'TOOLE
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                     Austin M. O'Toole
                                            Senior Vice President and Secretary


<PAGE>

                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS

                             THE COASTAL CORPORATION
                                    FORM 8-K

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit
  No.                        Description

  99.1         Press Release issued January 26, 1999.
5316.603-3 Limitations

See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5316.6 — TIME-AND-MATERIALS, LABOR-HOUR, AND LETTER

CONTRACTS
UNITED STATES 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

OFFICE OF THE 

INSPECTOR GENERAL 

 March 11, 2010 

MEMORANDUM TO: R. William Borchardt 

Executive Director for Operations 

J. E. Dyer 

Chief Financial Officer 

FROM: Stephen D. Dingbaum /RA/ 

Assistant Inspector General for Audits 

SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM REPORT: REVIEW OF NRC’S 

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL MANAGERS’ 

FINANCIAL INTEGRITY ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 

 (OIG-10-A-10) 

This report reflects the Office of the Inspector General’s assessment of the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) FY 2009 compliance with the Federal Managers’ Financial 

Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. We found that NRC complied with the FMFIA requirements. 

BACKGROUND

The FMFIA, enacted on September 8, 1982, requires ongoing evaluations and reports of the 

adequacy of internal controls and accounting systems of each executive agency. Further, 

the FMFIA requires that, each year, the head of each executive agency report to the 

President and the Congress on their agency’s compliance with the FMFIA requirements. 

Effective since FY 2006, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-123, 

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Control, revised December 2004, requires 

agencies to include the annual FMFIA report as part of the Performance and Accountability 

Report under the heading “Management Assurances.” Additionally, this circular requires 

management to provide a separate assurance statement relating to the effectiveness of 

internal control over financial reporting. 
RESULTS

In the FY 2009 Performance and Accountability Report, the Chairman provided reasonable 

assurance that internal control over operations, compliance with laws and regulations, and 

internal control over financial reporting were operating effectively and no material 

weaknesses were found. The Inspector General concurs with the assurances made and 

found that NRC complied with the FMFIA requirements. 

AGENCY COMMENTS

A draft report was provided to the Executive Director for Operations and the Chief Financial 

Officer for comment. These offices had no comments on the report. 

SCOPE/CONTRIBUTORS

We evaluated the internal controls related to NRC’s implementation of the FMFIA for 

FY 2009, and conducted our work during the period October 2009 - March 2010, in 

accordance with generally accepted Government auditing standards. Those standards 

require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to 

provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. 

We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and 

conclusions based on our audit objectives. This audit was conducted by Steven Zane, 

Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits; Kathleen Stetson, Audit Manager; 

Terri Cooper, Audit Manager; and Elaine Kolb, Senior Auditor. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at 415-5915 or Steven Zane at 415-5912. 

cc: Chairman Jaczko

Commissioner Klein 

Commissioner Svinicki 

N. Mamish, OEDO 

J. Andersen, OEDO 

J. Arildsen, OEDO 

C. Jaegers, OEDO
Fw: Interagency comments on Implementation , Preamble Sections V and 

VI--more comments from OMB on the implementation section

Lydia Wegman to:

James Hemby, Richard Wayland, Scott 

Mathias, Kevin McLean, Sara Schneeberg, 

Padmini Singh, Mike Thrift, Tricia Crabtree, 

Anna Wood, Larry Wallace

05/27/2010 06:35 PM

Haven't read these yet and don't plan to until tomorrow. I hope we can deal with these through e-mail, but 

if we need a meeting let me know. I probably won't be able to attend until Tuesday AM, but feel free to 

meet tomorrow and just let me know the time, in case I can attend. Thanks. Have a good weekend 

everyone. 

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/27/2010 06:32 PM -----

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/27/2010 06:31 PM

Subject: Interagency comments on Implementation, Preamble Sections V and VI

Lydia, FYI, there may be some addtl interagency comments on the preamble discussion regarding the

level of the standard coming tomorrow.  Have a good Memorial Day weekend.  ‐‐ jim
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0109:  Tasking II-1.A (SRM-SECY-15-0015):  Assessment of the Recommendations in theApril 30, 2015, Ernst and Young (EY) Overhead Assessment Report

Accession Number: ML15239B311

Date Released: Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15239B321 - SECY-15-0109:  Tasking II-1.A (SRM-SECY-15-0015):  Assessment of the Recommendations in the April 30, 2015, Ernst and Young (EY) Overhead Assessment Report (4 page(s), 8/28/2015)
    - ML15244B375 - SECY-15-0109:  Enclosure 1 - Overhead Assessment Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Final Report - April 30, 2015 (39 page(s), 4/30/2015)
    - ML15239B326 - SECY-15-0109: Enclosure 2 - Assessment of Cost Recommendations, EY Report for AIM 2020 (15 page(s), 8/28/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-55-964]


Accountemps, Leased Workers at Delta Energy Systems, Inc., 
Formerly Known as Ascom Energy Systems, Inc., Palm Court, FL; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on November 9, 2004 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Accountemps, leased to Delta 
Energy Systems, Inc., formerly known as Ascom Energy Systems, Inc., 
Palm Court, Florida.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-55,407, as amended). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 18th day of November 2004.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-26825 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Draft

– Deliberative

– Do Not Cite or Quote

Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) for 1,2,3

- TMB

1. A 90

- day inhalation toxicity study of 1,2,3

- TMB in male rats was selected as the basis for the derivation of the RfC (Korsak and Rydzynski, 1996). Please comment on whether the selection of this study is scientifically supported and clearly described. If a different study is recommended as the basis for the RfC, please identify this study and provide scientific support for this choice.

2. Decreased pain sensitivity (measured as an increased latency to pawlick response after a hotplate test) in male Wistar rats was concluded by EPA to be an adverse effect on the nervous system and was selected as the critical effect for the derivation of the RfC. Pl ease comment on whether the selection of this critical effect and its characterization are scientifically supported and clearly described. If a different endpoint is recommended as the critical effect for deriving the RfC, please identify this effect and provide scientific support for this choice.

3. Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling was conducted using data for d ecreased pain sensitivity in male Wistar rats in conjunction with default dosimetric adjustments for calculating the human equivalent concentration (HEC) to estimate the point of departure (POD) for derivation of the RfC. Has the modeling been appropriately conducted and clearly described, based on EPA’s draft Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document (U.S. EPA, 2000b)? Has the choice of the benchm ark response (BMR) for use in deriving the POD (i.e. a BMR of a change equal to 1 SD of the estimated control mean for the latency to pawlick response) been supported and clearly described?

4. Please comment on the rationale for the selection of the uncer tainty factors (UFs) applied to the POD for the derivation of the RfC for 1,2,3

- TMB. Are the UFs appropriate based on the recommendations described in A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes (U.S. EPA, 2002)

, and clearly descr ibed ? If changes to the selected UFs are proposed, please identify and provide scientific support for the proposed changes.

Oral Reference Dose (RfD) for 1,2,3

- TMB

The oral database for 1,2,3

- TMB was considered to be inadequate for derivation of an Rf D. Based on the similarities in chemical properties, toxicokinetics, and toxicity between the 1,2,4

- TMB and 1,2,3

- TMB isomers, EPA concluded that there was sufficient similarity to support adopting the 1,2,4

- TMB RfD as the RfD for 1,2,3

- TMB

.

1. Please comment on EPA’s conclusion that the oral database for 1,2,3

- TMB is inadequate for derivation of an RfD. If an oral study on 1,2,3

- TMB is recommended as the basis for the RfD, please identify this study and provide scientific support for this choice.

2. Please comment on EPA’s approach to developing the RfD for 1,2,3

- TMB

. Has the rationale for using the RfD for 1,2,4

- TMB as the RfD for 1,2,3

- TMB been appropriately and clearly presented? Please comment on whether th is approach is scientifically supporte d and clearly described in the document.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patent and U.S. Patent Applications for Non-
Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404 
announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the U.S. 
Patent Applications and U.S. Patent for non-exclusive, exclusive, or 
partially exclusive licensing listed under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 
The invention listed has been assigned to the United States Government 
as represented by the Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Biffoni, Intellectual 
Property attorney, U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering 
Command, Attn: AMSRD-CC (Bldg. E4435), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 
21010-5424, phone: (410) 436-1158: fax: 410-436-2534 or e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52077c183d3a3c7c103b34343d3c3b1227217c33203f2b7c3f3b3e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="287d0662474046066a414e4e474641685d5b06495a455106454144">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. Title: ``Collapsing and Telescoping Baffles for Stirred 
Vessels.''
    Description: The present invention relates to the field of baffles 
for use in stirred vessels, such as reaction calorimeters. 
Specifically, the invention is a set of removable baffles, forming a 
system which need not be manufactured with the vessel itself. Due to 
its construction, the baffle system of this invention is removable and 
replaceable.
    Patent Number: 6,769,800.
    Issue Date: August 3, 2004.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26804 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TIME 11:22 EDT

DATE 4 / 13 / 2015

RECORD OF CONVERSATION

NAME(S) OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONFERENCE AND LOCATION Lacy Charvet, Vice President, Southern Seaplane Inc.

SUBJECT Request for exemption: Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2673

DIGEST Lacy Charvet was contacted to obtain additional background information related to her petition f or exemption. Ms. Charvet was asked which aircraft would be used in Southern Seaplane Inc.’s part

141 training program. The aircraft that would be operated by Southe rn Seaplane, for the purposes of this exemption, would be its Cessna CE 185, CE

- 206, and CE

- 210.

An additional question was asked regarding Southern Seaplane’s capability of using a hard surface

runway. Southern Seaplane can conduct operations using its private asphalt runway measuring 3200 x 40 feet which is used by it s amphibious aircraft for take

- offs.

CONCLUSION, ACTION TAKEN, OR REQUIRED The information obtained was relevant to the petition for exemption and will be considered.

Jabari Raphael

, Aviation Safety Analyst

, Airmen Certification and Training Branch, AFS

- 810