alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15891. Projects enhancing insular energy independence

#### (a) Project feasibility studies

#### (1) In general

On a request described in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall conduct a feasibility study of a project to implement a strategy or project identified in the plans submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1492 of title 48 as having the potential to—

(A) significantly reduce the dependence of an insular area on imported fossil fuels; or

(B) provide needed distributed generation to an insular area.

#### (2) Request

The Secretary shall conduct a feasibility study under paragraph (1) on—

(A) the request of an electric utility located in an insular area that commits to fund at least 10 percent of the cost of the study; and

(B) if the electric utility is located in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau, written support for that request by the President or the Ambassador of the affected freely associated state.

#### (3) Consultation

The Secretary shall consult with regional utility organizations in—

(A) conducting feasibility studies under paragraph (1); and

(B) determining the feasibility of potential projects.

#### (4) Feasibility

For the purpose of a feasibility study under paragraph (1), a project shall be determined to be feasible if the project would significantly reduce the dependence of an insular area on imported fossil fuels, or provide needed distributed generation to an insular area, at a reasonable cost.

#### (b) Implementation

#### (1) In general

On a determination by the Secretary (in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior) that a project is feasible under subsection (a) and a commitment by an electric utility to operate and maintain the project, the Secretary may provide such technical and financial assistance as the Secretary determines is appropriate for the implementation of the project.

#### (2) Regional utility organizations

In providing assistance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider providing the assistance through regional utility organizations.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary—

(A) $500,000 for each fiscal year for project feasibility studies under subsection (a); and

(B) $4,000,000 for each fiscal year for project implementation under subsection (b).

#### (2) Limitation of funds received by insular areas

No insular area may receive, during any 3-year period, more than 20 percent of the total funds made available during that 3-year period under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) unless the Secretary determines that providing funding in excess of that percentage best advances existing opportunities to meet the objectives of this section.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §252, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 682.)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00481

- CR

Jalen Veliz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA , AN D SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of co nviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ argumen ts, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay cost s, no adjudica t i on o f costs is made.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3991 

To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from requiring that employers provide to the Board or to a labor organization the telephone number 

or email address of any employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mrs. ADAMS (for herself, Mr. ROSS of Florida, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BURGESS, 

Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. JONES, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. 

CHAFFETZ, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. POSEY, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. WEBSTER, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. 

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. PITTS, Mr. COLE, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WALSH of Illinois, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. YODER, Mr. 

KING of Iowa, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. PRICE of 

Georgia, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. RIVERA, Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from requiring that employers provide to the Board or to a labor 

organization the telephone number or email address of 

any employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3991 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Employees’ 

3 Emails and Phones Secure Act’’ or the ‘‘KEEP Secure 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO ‘‘EXCELSIOR’’ LISTS. 

6 Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(6) In no circumstances shall the Board require an 

9 employer to provide to the Board or to a labor organiza10 tion the telephone number or email address of any em11 ployee.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70551-70552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26841]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD05-04-212]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Approaches to 
Annapolis Harbor, Spa Creek and Severn River, Annapolis, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of implementation of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
at 33 CFR 100.511 during the Eastport Yacht Club Lights Parade, a 
marine event to be held December 11, 2004, on the waters of Spa Creek 
and the Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local 
regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined 
nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the event. 
The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area 
for the safety of event participants, spectators and vessels transiting 
the event area.

DATES: 33 CFR 100.511 will be enforced from 4:45 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. on 
December 11, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Houck, Marine Events 
Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins 
Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2513.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Eastport Yacht Club will sponsor a 
lighted boat parade on the waters of Spa Creek and the Severn River at 
Annapolis, Maryland. The event will consist of approximately 75 boats 
traveling at slow speed along two separate parade routes in Annapolis 
Harbor. The participating boats will range in length from 10 to 90 
feet, and each will be decorated with holiday lights. In order to 
ensure the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels, 
33 CFR 100.511 will be enforced for the duration of the event. Under 
the provisions of 33 CFR 100.511, vessels may not enter the regulated 
area without permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. 
Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not 
block a navigable channel. Because these restrictions will be in effect 
for a limited period, they should not result in a

[[Page 70552]]

significant disruption of maritime traffic.
    In addition to this notice, the maritime community will be provided 
extensive advance notification via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine 
information broadcasts, and area newspapers, so mariners can adjust 
their plans accordingly.

    Dated: November 24, 2004.
Ben R. Thomason, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, 
Acting.
[FR Doc. 04-26841 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
..¶-rORWLY SmwsKYAI. August29. 1972

Honorable Robert Buntyn OpinionNo. M-1197 CountyAttorney Castro County Courthouse R8: Whether the Commiseioners Dimmitt, Texas 79027 Court of Castro Countymay set the salaries of Justices of the Peace at an hourly rate **for** hours actually Dear Mr. Buntyn: worked.

You have requested an opinion as to whether the Commissioners Court of Castro Countymay set the salaries of Justices of the Peace at an'hourly rata for hours actuallyworked.

The commissionerscourt is a court of limited jurisdiction and,i+iasonly such powers as ere conferred upon it by the statutes 'andConstitutionof this State,whether by express terms or by **necessary** ~mpliqa~ion. Section 18, Article V, Constitution of Texas: Article 2351,Vernon's Civil Statutes; and Attorney General's Opinion C-350 (1965),and numerous case authorities there cited.Under~

the provisions of Section 61 of Article XVI of the Constitution **o ’** **f** Texas, the comniissioners court has the authodty to determinewhether justices **of** the peace are to be compensated on a'fee.basieor a salary basis. Attorney General's Opp;;ms C-497 (1965),V-748 (1948),WW-1499 (1962).and V-750

. Article 53.07,, Texas Code **of** Criminal Procedure, requiring every justice of the peace to be compensated on a salary basis hes bean held to.'b+ unconstitutionaland in violation of Article XVI, Section 61, Texas Constitution. Attorney General’s Opinion C-497, supra.

We know of no provision in the Constitution or 'statutes **of** this State authorizing the commissioners court to compensate justices **of** the peace on an hourly basis.

The commissionerscourtmay not interfere or usurp the sphere that is delegated to a county official by law. Pritchard & Abbott vi McKenna, 350 S.W.Zd 335 (Tex.Sup.1961). Therefore, the commissioners court is not authorized to prescribe office hours
-5842-.

Hon. Robert Buntyn,page 2 (M-1197)

of a county or precinct official or the days which such official would be required to keep his office open. Attorney General's Opinions O-6679 (1945)and C-350 (1964).

Since the commissionerscourt does not have the authority to prescribe office hours of justices of the peace and themethod of compensationis prescribedby the Constitution as either a fee basis or a salary basis,you are advised that the commissioners court does not have the authority to compensate justices **of** the peace on an hourlybasis. SUMMARY A commissionerscourt does not to compensate justicesof the peace basis. have authority on an hourly

Ve94 truly yours,



### c. Mh .~~ ey General of Texas Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Sam Jones Gordon Cass John Banks Bob Lattimore SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant

-5843-
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick T. Doyle, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



/s/PATRICK T. DOYLEPatrick T. Doyle Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2008


---



QuickLinks
### §13981. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13981 was editorially reclassified as section 12361 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

10/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Oct 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■ ■

★

■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

● ●

★

● ●

● ●
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.17Ac3-1 Withdrawal from registration with the Commission. ( a ) Notice of withdrawal from registration as a transfer agent with the Commission pursuant to section 17A(c)(4) of the Act shall be filed on Form TA-W in accordance with the instructions contained thereon.
( b ) Except as hereinafter provided, a notice to withdraw from registration filed by a transfer agent pursuant to section 17A(c)(4) of the Act shall become effective on the sixtieth day after the filing thereof with the Commission or within such shorter period of time as the Commission may determine. If a notice to withdraw from registration is filed with the Commission at any time subsequent to the date of issuance of a Commission order instituting proceedings pursuant to section 17A(c)(3) of the Act, or if prior to the effective date of the notice of withdrawal the Commission institutes such a proceeding or a proceeding to impose terms and conditions upon such withdrawal, the notice of withdrawal shall not become effective except at such time and upon such terms and conditions as the Commission deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or in furtherance of the purposes of section 17A.
( c ) Every withdrawal from registration filed pursuant to this section shall be filed with the Commission electronically in the Commission's EDGAR system. Transfer agents should refer to Form TA-W and the instructions to the form (§ 249b.101 of this chapter) and the EDGAR Filer Manual (§ 232.301 of this chapter) for further information regarding electronic filing.
( d ) Every notice of withdrawal filed pursuant to this rule shall constitute a “report” within the meaning of sections 17 and 32(a) of the Act.
[42 FR 44984, Sept. 8, 1977, as amended at 71 FR 74709, Dec. 12, 2006]
### §18651. High intensity laser research initiative

#### (a) In general

The Director shall establish a high intensity laser research initiative consistent with the recommendations of the National Academies report entitled "Opportunities in Intense Ultrafast Lasers: Reaching for the Brightest Light" and the report from the Brightest Light Initiative workshop entitled "The Future of Intense Ultrafast Lasers in the U.S.". The initiative should include research and development of petawatt-scale and of high average power laser technologies necessary for future facility needs in discovery science and to advance energy technologies, as well as support for a user network of academic and National Laboratory high intensity laser facilities.

#### (b) Leverage

The Director shall leverage new laser technologies for more compact, less complex, and low-cost accelerator systems needed for science applications.

#### (c) Coordination

#### (1) Director

The Director shall coordinate the initiative established under subsection (a) among all relevant programs within the Office of Science.

#### (2) Under Secretary

The Under Secretary for Science shall coordinate the initiative established under subsection (a) with other relevant programs within the Department and other Federal agencies.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

Out of funds authorized to be appropriated for the Office of Science in a fiscal year, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the activities described in this section—

(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;

(2) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;

(3) $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2025;

(4) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; and

(5) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.

(Pub. L. 115–246, title III, §313, as added Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title I, §10112(a), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1459.)
### §13291. General authority

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall undertake a program with one or more non-Federal persons, including fleet operators, for cost-shared research, development, demonstration, or commercial application of an infrastructure and support systems program.

#### (b) Eligibility

A non-Federal person shall be eligible to receive financial assistance under this part only if such person demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, that the person will conduct a substantial portion of activities under the project in the United States using domestic labor and materials.

#### (c) Coordination

Activities under this part shall be coordinated with activities under part A.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title VI, §621, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2904.)
#### § 12.404 The record of proceedings.

The record of proceedings on appeal before the Commission shall include: The pleadings; motions and requests filed, and rulings thereon; the transcript of the testimony taken at an oral hearing, together with the exhibits filed therein; the transcript of testimony taken during an oral examination by telephone; any statements or stipulations filed in any proceeding; any documents or papers filed in connection with prehearing conferences; such proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and orders and briefs as may have been permitted to be filed in connection with an oral hearing; such statements of objections, and briefs in support thereof, as may have been filed in the proceedings; and the initial (or final) decision, or other order disposing of issues in the proceeding.

[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9638, Mar. 1, 1994]
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/Gadi Aner                          |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Gadi Aner                             |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  |   |
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   | By:    | /s/Gabby Klausner                     |   |
|   |   | Gabby Klausner                        |   |
|   |   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
### §17218. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this part $186,600,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025, including $137,428,378 for marine energy and $49,171,622 for hydropower research, development, and demonstration activities.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §639, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3001(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2486.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### §§ 200.641-200.648 [Reserved]
No: II-16-027 April 28, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Performance at Honeywell Metropolis Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting on Thursday, May 5,

to discuss the results of its regulatory safety performance review of the Honeywell uranium conversion 

plant in Metropolis, Ill.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in the Metropolis Community Center, 900 West 10th

Street in Metropolis. The meeting is open to the public and the media, and NRC officials will be 

available after the formal presentation to answer questions.

The NRC staff assessed performance of the Honeywell facility during the assessment period 

beginning Jan. 1, 2014 and ending Dec. 31, 2015, in safety operations, radiological controls, facility 

support and other areas. The NRC staff review determined that the company continued to conduct its 

activities safely and securely, protecting public health and the environment.

The review found that none of the program areas needed improvement, which means the NRC 

will continue its normal inspection program for such facilities. NRC inspectors did conduct two 

inspections in response to events at the facility in October 2014 and August 2015, but determined that 

the company took appropriate actions to address the causes of those events.

“The NRC inspects Honeywell and other nuclear fuel facilities to monitor their safety 

performance and verify that they are meeting NRC regulations,” said NRC Region II Administrator 

Cathy Haney. “We post our inspection reports online and we also hold regular meetings near the 

facilities to discuss our oversight and answer questions from members of the public.”

A copy of the NRC letter to the company regarding the performance review is publicly 

available on the NRC website.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 324]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4444]]

Public Law 115-324
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to modify the method for prescribing 
  size standards for business concerns. <<NOTE: Dec. 17, 2018 -  [H.R. 
                                6330]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Small Business 
Runway Extension Act of 2018.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 15 USC 631 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Runway Extension Act 
of 2018''.
SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO METHOD FOR PRESCRIBING SIZE STANDARDS FOR 
                    BUSINESS CONCERNS.

    Section 3(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
632(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II)) is amended by striking ``3 years'' and inserting 
``5 years''.

    Approved December 17, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6330:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-939 (Comm. on Small Business).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4063 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4063

To repeal section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility 
and Disclosure Act of 2009 which relates to carrying certain weapons in 
                            National Parks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2012

   Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Dicks, Mr. Moran, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
Honda, Mr. Farr, Ms. Lee of California, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. 
Pascrell, and Mr. George Miller of California) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility 
and Disclosure Act of 2009 which relates to carrying certain weapons in 
                            National Parks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guns-Free National Parks Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION THAT RELATES TO CARRYING CERTAIN WEAPONS IN 
              NATIONAL PARKS.

    Section 512 of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and 
Disclosure Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 1a-7b) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```