alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release of Solicitations in Advance of Funding Availability       Except for solicitations and contracts issued in accordance with FAR 32.703-2(a) and clause 52.232-18, *Availability of Funds*, follow the         procedures below when issuing solicitations in advance of available funds:          (a) The following statement must be included in any such solicitation:         *“Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No         award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government         reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In         the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to         reimburse an offeror for any costs.”*          (b) When the resulting contract is to be funded by Procurement or         Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation appropriations, the program/requirement must be         included in the President’s budget as submitted to Congress, and the program manager must         provide the contracting officer a written statement, indicating the program's inclusion. The         statement must be coordinated with FM at the Center level (or equivalent) or as delegated to         FM Organizational Senior Functional (OSF) that these investment funds will be used for the         proposed acquisition and, although not presently available, a reasonable expectation exists         that funding will be authorized and available upon enactment of the Authorization and         Appropriations Acts.          (c) For solicitations for programs funded by the National Guard and         Reserve Equipment Account when the Defense Appropriations Act is signed into law, for the         Air National Guard Bureau, and/or Air Force Reserve Command, the Air National Guard or         Reserve program manager must confirm that funds have been identified for the acquisition.          (d) Except for solicitations for operational contracting supply         requirements less than $1M and funded with annual appropriations, the         MAJCOM/FLDCOM/DRU/DAFRCO Requiring Activity Functional Commander/Director, SCO, and         Comptroller, or their appointed representatives, must jointly agree in writing to authorize         the operational contracting office to issue solicitations when it is anticipated that the         contract(s) will be funded, but funds are not yet available.   **Parent topic:** MP5332.7 - CONTRACT FUNDING
§ 210.3-10 Financial statements of guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities registered or being registered. ( a ) If an issuer or guarantor of a guaranteed security that is registered or being registered is required to file financial statements required by Regulation S-X with respect to the guarantee or guaranteed security, such financial statements may be omitted if the issuer or guarantor is a consolidated subsidiary of the parent company, the parent company's consolidated financial statements have been filed, and the conditions in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section have been met: ( 1 ) The guaranteed security is debt or debt-like; and ( i ) The parent company issues the security or co-issues the security, jointly and severally, with one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries; or
( ii ) A consolidated subsidiary issues the security or co-issues the security with one or more other consolidated subsidiaries of the parent company, and the security is guaranteed fully and unconditionally by the parent company; and
( 2 ) The parent company provides the disclosures specified in § 210.13-01.
( b ) For the purposes of this section and § 210.13-01: ( 1 ) The “parent company” is the entity that: ( i ) Is an issuer or guarantor of the guaranteed security;
( ii ) Is, or as a result of the subject Securities Act registration statement will be, an Exchange Act reporting company; and
( iii ) Consolidates each subsidiary issuer and/or subsidiary guarantor of the guaranteed security in its consolidated financial statements.
( 2 ) A security is “debt or debt-like” if it has the following characteristics: ( i ) The issuer has a contractual obligation to pay a fixed sum at a fixed time; and
( ii ) Where the obligation to make such payments is cumulative, a set amount of interest must be paid. *Note 1 to paragraph (b)(2).* Neither the form of the security nor its title will determine whether a security is debt or debt-like. Instead, the substance of the obligation created by the security will be determinative. *Note 2 to paragraph (b)(2).* The phrase “set amount of interest” is not intended to mean “fixed amount of interest.” Floating and adjustable rate securities, as well as indexed securities, may meet the criteria specified in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section as long as the payment obligation is set in the debt instrument and can be determined from objective indices or other factors that are outside the discretion of the obligor.
( 3 ) A guarantee is “full and unconditional,” if, when an issuer of a guaranteed security has failed to make a scheduled payment, the guarantor is obligated to make the scheduled payment immediately and, if it does not, any holder of the guaranteed security may immediately bring suit directly against the guarantor for payment of all amounts due and payable.
[85 FR 21999, Apr. 20, 2020]
#### § 149.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of Surrey
Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H. Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III                       |  |  |  |  |  | Date: August 11, 2010 |  | 
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.                          |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|    |  |                                                |  |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  |  |  |  |  | Date: August 11, 2010 |  | 
|    |  | Mark H. Towe                                   |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                  |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert F. Kendall, Chief Financial Officer of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and Ihave:
(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation;and
(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 20, 2005 /s/ Robert F. Kendall    Name: Robert F. Kendall, CPA Title: Chief Financial Officer   (principal financial officer)
§ 5.67 Sanctions. In the case of any respondent who fails to request a hearing after receiving adequate notice of the allegations pursuant to § 5.57 or who is found in the Commission's final decision to have violated 18 U.S.C. 207 (a), (b), or (c), the Commission may order such disciplinary action as it deems warranted, including: ( a ) Reprimand;
( b ) Suspension from participating in a particular matter or matters before the Commission; or
( c ) Prohibiting the respondent from making, with the intent to influence, any formal or informal appearance before, or any oral or written communication to, the Commission or its staff on any matter or business on behalf of any other person (except the United States) for a period not to exceed five (5) years.
#### § 232.103 Liability for transmission errors or omissions in documents filed via EDGAR.

An electronic filer shall not be subject to the liability and anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws with respect to an error or omission in an electronic filing resulting solely from electronic transmission errors beyond the control of the filer, where the filer corrects the error or omission by the filing of an amendment in electronic format as soon as reasonably practicable after the electronic filer becomes aware of the error or omission.

[65 FR 24800, Apr. 27, 2000]
Subpart 536.1 - General 	  **Parent topic:** Part 536 - Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts536.101 Applicability. 		    This part supplements FAR 36 policies and procedures applicable to contracting for construction and architect engineer services. Contracts for construction management services are covered by FAR 37 and GSAM part  537. part  536 shall take precedence when the acquisition involves (1) construction or architect-engineer services, and (2) when the requirement is inconsistent with another part of the GSAR.536.102 Definitions. 		    “Construction activity” means the organizational level of the agency that has authority and responsibility for the architectural, engineering, and other technical or administrative aspects of design and construction. 			      “Construction-Manager-as-Constructor” (CMc) means the project delivery method where design and construction are contracted concurrently through two separate contracts and two separate contractors. Unlike the traditional design-bid-build delivery method, under the CMc delivery method, the Government awards a separate contract to a designer *(i.e.*, architect-engineer contractor) and to a construction contractor (*i.e.*, CMc contractor) prior to the completion of the design documents. The Government retains the CMc contractor during design to work with the architect-engineer contractor to provide constructability reviews and cost estimating validation. The CMc contract includes design phase services at a firm-fixed-price and an option for construction at a guaranteed maximum price. 			      “Statutory cost limitations” means the cost limits included in the agency’s statutory authorization or annual appropriations act (by law).536.103 Methods of Contracting. 		    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, although CMc contracts are considered incentive-type contracts (see 536.207), contracting officers are authorized to use the CMc project delivery method without completing a determination and finding as required by FAR 16.401(d). Contracting officers shall discuss the CMc project delivery method as part of the acquisition plan (see FAR 7.105). 				         				         					          (b)  To the extent the contracting officer incorporates an award-fee component into the CMc (in addition to the shared savings incentive), then the determination and finding required by FAR 16.401(d) is required to support any such award-fee. 				         				         					          (c)  The contracting officer shall use the tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1, unless a different source selection approach is approved in writing by the HCA, for selecting a construction contractor under the CMc project delivery method, and select sources in accordance with subpart 536.7103.
#### § 166.3 Supervision.

Each Commission registrant, except an associated person who has no supervisory duties, must diligently supervise the handling by its partners, officers, employees and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) of all commodity interest accounts carried, operated, advised or introduced by the registrant and all other activities of its partners, officers, employees and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) relating to its business as a Commission registrant.

[48 FR 35304, Aug. 3, 1983]
### §19114. Research and development awards

#### (a) In general

From amounts made available for the Directorate, the Director shall make awards, on a competitive basis, for research and technology development within the key technology focus areas, including investments that advance solutions to the challenges under section 19107 of this title.

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of the awards under this section shall be to accelerate technological advances and technology adoption in the key technology focus areas.

#### (c) Recipients

Recipients of funds under this section may include institutions of higher education, research institutions, non-profit organizations, private sector entities, consortia, or other entities as defined by the Director.

#### (d) Metrics

The Director may set metrics, including goals and deadlines, for the development and demonstration of technology as determined in the terms of the award, and may use such metrics to determine whether an award recipient shall be eligible for continued or follow-on funding.

#### (e) Short term technology deployment

The Director shall also make awards, including through the SBIR and STTR programs (as defined in section 638(e) of title 15), to expedite short-term technology deployment within a period of no longer than 24 months.

#### (f) Selection criteria

In selecting recipients for an award under this section, the Director shall consider, at a minimum—

(1) the relevance of the project to the challenges and the key technology focus areas under section 19107 of this title, and the potential of the project to result in transformational advances for such challenges and the key technology focus areas;

(2) the current status of similar technology, the limits of current practice, and the novelty and risks of the proposed project;

(3) the ethical, societal, safety, and security implications relevant to the application of the technology;

(4) the appropriateness of quantitative goals and metrics for evaluating the project and a plan for evaluating those metrics; and

(5) the path for developing and, as appropriate, commercializing the technology into products and processes in the United States.

#### (g) Authorization of appropriations

From within funds authorized for the Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships, there are authorized to carry out the activities under this section $1,000,000,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10394, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1591.)
#### George W. French, plaintiff in error, v. Martha L. English, defendant in error.

1. Practice in Supreme Court: dismissal of actions., Where judgment was rendered May 17th, 1877, and a petition in error was filed in the supreme court, December 13lh, 1877. *Held,*on a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, that the motion must be sustained.

2. -: -. Cases may arise where it would be proper to set up the limitation by answer; but where it appears on the face of the papers that they were not filed within the time prescribed by the statute, the defect may be taken advantage of by motion.

Maxwell, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the cause on the ground that the petition in error was not filed within six months from the date of the judgment, the judgment being rendered May 17th, 1877, and the petition in error being filed December 13th, 1877.

The act to amend section 592 of the code of civil procedure, approved February 24, 1875, provides that “no proceeding for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgments or final orders, shall be commenced unless within six months after the rendition of the judgment *125or making of the final order complained of. Laws 1875, p. 40.

*Cobb (& Marquett*for the motion.

*S. B. Galey*and *James E. PMlpott, contra.*

The act approved February 15, 1877, extended the time to one year. Laws 1877, p. 14.

Section one of an act approved February 21, 1873, provides “that every act- passed by the legislature, which contains no provisions as to the time when it takes effect, shall take effect and become a law from and after the first of next June.” Gen. Stat., 1056.

As the act of 1877 was not in operation at the time the judgment was rendered, and more than six months having elapsed before the cause was filed in this court, the motion to dismiss must be sustained.

It is claimed that the objection can only be made by answer setting up the statutory limitation. Cases may arise where it would be proper for a party to file an answer setting up the limitation. But where it appears on the face of the papers that they were not filed within the period prescribed by statute, the defect may be taken advantage of by motion. The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Judgment accordingly.
** **

**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement No. 333-262566 on Form S-8, of our auditor’s report dated March 17, 2022 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of TerrAscend Corp. (and its subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for each of the three years in theperiod ended December 31, 2021, as included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TerrAscend Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2021,as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ MNP LLP

 

Chartered Professional Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

March 24, 2022

Toronto, Canada
### §17241. Lightweight materials research and development

#### (a) In general

As soon as practicable after December 19, 2007, the Secretary of Energy shall establish a program to determine ways in which the weight of motor vehicles could be reduced to improve fuel efficiency without compromising passenger safety by conducting research, development, and demonstration relating to—

(1) the development of new materials (including cast metal composite materials formed by autocombustion synthesis) and material processes that yield a higher strength-to-weight ratio or other properties that reduce vehicle weight; and

(2) reducing the cost of—

(A) lightweight materials (including high-strength steel alloys, aluminum, magnesium, metal composites, and carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites) with the properties required for construction of lighter-weight vehicles; and

(B) materials processing, automated manufacturing, joining, and recycling lightweight materials for high-volume applications.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $80,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §651, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1694.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
#### In the Matter of Patricia E. Swartz, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[820 NYS2d 919]

Order of suspension entered. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5989-5990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee: Notice of 
Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Clinical Laboratory Improvement 
Advisory Committee, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed 
for a 2-year period beginning February 19, 2004, through February 19, 
2006.
    For further information, contact Robert Martin, M.D., Executive 
Secretary, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee, CDC, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE, m/s G-25, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 
(770)

[[Page 5990]]

488-8295, fax (770) 488-8282, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f2a0bf9380869b9cc3b2919691dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b09163a292f32356a1b383f38753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 2, 2004.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 04-2677 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>