1

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

A. Justification 

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any

legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard copy of the 

appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of 

information, or you may provide a valid URL link or paste the applicable section1. Specify the 

review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement 

without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note 

of the sections or changed sections, if applicable.

This request is for revision of the approval of the reporting and recordkeeping

requirements that are contained in the information collection 1845-0049 for Student 

Assistance General Provision regulations Subpart J-Approval of Independently

Administered Tests; Specification of Passing Score; Approval of State Process. These 

regulations govern the application for and approval by the Secretary of assessments by a 

private test publisher or State that are used to measure a student’s skills and abilities. The 

administration of approved ability to benefit (ATB) tests may be used to determine a 

student's eligibility for assistance for the Title IV student financial assistance programs 

authorized under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) when the student 

does not have a high school diploma or its recognized equivalent. 

The HEA, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74)

changed the Federal student aid eligibility criteria for students without a high school 

diploma or the recognized equivalent of a high school diploma. The statute retained the

completion of a homeschool program as an eligibility alternative, but removed the 

passing of an independently administered Department approved ATB test as an eligibility

criteria previously available to aid applicants. This change was effective for students 

who first enrolled in a program of study on or after July 1, 2012. Official guidance from 

the Department maintains that for students who previously attended an eligible program 

prior to July 1, 2012 and need to establish Title IV eligibility after July 1, 2012, the 

provisions of Public Law 112-74 do not apply and will not prevent those students from 

using prior ATB alternatives including passing an ATB test.

Because of this change there are a diminishing number of student applicants who could 

qualify to use the passing an ATB test alternative to determine Title IV eligibility. There 

has also been a decrease in the number of previously approved ATB examinations as test 

publishers have notified the Department that they are voluntarily removing their 

examinations from being used for ATB purposes.

 

1

Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 paragraphs.
2

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

The language of the current regulations has not changed. This application will show a 

decrease in the number of tests and students who may use them from prior burden 

estimates.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new 

collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the 

current collection.

The Department of Education is responsible for evaluating the quality of the State plans 

and private ATB test publisher tests submitted under the provisions articulated by the 

Secretary. Department staff will read the submitted tests and use psychometrician 

services to evaluate the submitted ATB tests using the Secretary's guidelines in these 

established regulations to determine if the tests meet the conditions for approval by the 

Secretary. 

Postsecondary institutions will evaluate the test scores obtained by the student applicants 

for Federal student assistance to determine whether the student is eligible under the law 

for Title IV, HEA program assistance.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of 

information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the 

decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using 

technology to reduce burden.

Although there are no legal or technical obstacles to the use of technology in this 

information collection activity, the process for applicants to submit their tests for 

approval is generally not conducive to any more sophisticated use of technology. 

However, over time we have seen ATB test publishers move from “paper and pencil” 

tests to computer-based testing and expect this trend to continue. As testing moves into 

computer-based formats, the reporting of the test results by test publishers to the 

institutions the student plans to attend should be more automated, until then States and 

test publishers will continue to provide students with a paper output report or electronic 

output document, and institutions with an electronic output document.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information 

already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

The information supplied for State provided plans, for ATB test publisher applications 

for test approval, and in the students' test score results is not duplicated on any other 

information collection.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any

methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed 

to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of 

operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently
3

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, 

which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000.

No small businesses are affected by this information collection.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not 

conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing 

burden.

If this collection is not conducted it is possible that a student without aid eligibility could

receive federal student aid in conflict with the law and in violation of the Department’s 

fiduciary responsibilities to protect the government and taxpayer against loss through 

fraud and mismanagement. Alternately, without this collection, an otherwise eligible 

student may be denied a federal benefit for which they are eligible.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted 

in a manner:

 requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

 requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in 

fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

 requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

 requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, 

grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

 in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable 

results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

 requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and 

approved by OMB;

 that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in 

statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are 

consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other 

agencies for compatible confidential use; or

 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential 

information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect 

the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

This application is consistent with all of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d) (2), except for 

the request for multiple copies of each test. These tests are copyrighted and cannot be 

duplicated by the Department for review purposes. Therefore, the Department is 

requesting a waiver for 5 CFR 1320.5(d) (2) (iii). Multiple copies of the tests are 

required because the tests are reviewed and analyzed by Department staff and several 

testing experts under agreement with the Department, before any test approval is granted 

by the Secretary.
4

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices 

as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to 

submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and 

describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address 

comments received on cost and hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the 

availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, 

disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or 

reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those 

who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of 

information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may

preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

This request is for the 30 day Federal Register notice seeking public comment on these 

burden assessments. The Department previously issued a 60-day Federal Register notice

requesting public comment. No comments were received.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration 

of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

There are no payments or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the 

assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is 

being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a 

citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was 

completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that 

authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.2If the collection is subject to the 

Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If 

there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge 

about the confidentially of the data.

There is no assurance of confidentiality provided to the respondents concerning the 

application for State plans or test approval and assurance of confidentiality for the 

submission of test scores.

 

2

Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, 

OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 

Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB 

Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 –

Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection 

of Personally Identifiable Information)
5

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual 

behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. 

The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, 

the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from 

whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

There are no questions of a sensitive nature in this application.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

 Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, 

individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private 

sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), 

frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was 

estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third 

party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do 

so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to 

base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential 

respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely 

because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated 

hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should 

not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

 If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden 

estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCIS IC Burden 

Analysis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent types, IC activity, 

Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total Hours)

 Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for 

collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. 

The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection 

activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 

14.

Due to changes in the statute regarding availability of ATB tests for new students, there 

has been a decrease in both the number of students taking the tests as well as the number 

of approved tests available as test publishers have voluntarily removed certain exams 

from ATB use.

The request for ATB test approval from independent test publishers or the request for 

approval of a State process will continue to be as often as the test developers determine it 

is in their interest to apply for the Secretary's approval or as the agreement reaches its 

expiration consistent with the regulations in Subpart J. To date, there have been zero 

State submissions for approval and as noted earlier some previously approved 

examinations have been voluntarily removed from use by the test publisher as an ATB

examination. Therefore there is a decrease in the burden assessed publishers for the 

submission of the renewal of these examinations.
6

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

The submission of the student’s test score results from the test publisher to the institution 

generally, will occur only once. In other cases, where the institution is a two-year or 

four-year degree granting institution or a public postsecondary vocational institution and 

the institution has a qualified assessment center, the center may score the student’s ATB 

test and provide the results to the student’s institution. Because of the change in the law,

fewer students will have the ability to use an approved ATB examination to meet the 

general student eligibility criteria for Title IV, HEA program assistance.

Section 668.144 – Application for test approval.

Section 668.144(c) (16) & (d) (7) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectively, 

as part of its ATB test application describe its process to determine how a test 

administrator has the necessary training, knowledge, skills, and integrity to test students, 

as well as how a test administrator has the ability and facilities to keep its test secure 

against disclosure or release.

We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 2.5 additional hours to 

develop its process to establish that a test administrator has the necessary training, 

knowledge, skills and integrity to test students. Pursuant to prior regulatory

requirements, each test publisher or State was required to have a process for determining 

the level of training, knowledge, and skills of a test administrator, the new final 

requirement includes a process to determine the integrity of the test administrator and to 

report their process to the Secretary in its submission for approval.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

8 8 X 2.5 hours 20

Revised Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

4 4 X 2.5 hours 10

Section 668.144(c)(17) & (d)(8) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectively, 

will explain to the Secretary its test anomaly analysis; how it will identify potential test 

irregularities and make a determination that test irregularities have occurred; an 

explanation of the process and procedures for corrective action, including decertification 

of a certified test administrator; and report information on when and how it will notify a 

test administrator, the Secretary, the institutions where the test irregularities occurred, 

that the test administrator has been decertified.

We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 75 hours to develop its test 

anomaly process and to establish its test anomaly analysis and explain it to the Secretary. 

That explanation must include its test irregularity detection process, its corrective action 

process, including its decertification of test administrator process, as well as its reporting 

processes. 
7

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

8 8 X 75 hours 600

Revised Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

4 4 X 75 hours 300

Section 668.144(c)(18) & (d)(9) requires that a test publisher and a State, respectively, 

will describe to the Secretary the types of accommodations available to individuals with 

disabilities, including an explanation of any accessible technologies and a description of 

the process for a test administrator to identify and report when accommodations for 

individuals with disabilities were provided.

We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 1 hour to develop and 

describe to the Secretary the types of accommodations available to individuals with 

disabilities, the process the test administrator will use to support the identification of the 

disability and the process to report when accommodations were used.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

8 8 X 1 hour 8

Revised Burden for the For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

4 4 X 1hour 4

Current Sub-total for 34 CFR 668.144:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

24 24 628

Revised Sub-total for 34 CFR 668.144:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

12 12 314

Section 668.150 – Agreement between the Secretary and a test publisher or a State.

Section 668.150(b) (2) requires that each test publisher or State to obtain a certification 

statement from each prospective test administrator indicating that he or she is not 

currently decertified and that if the test administrator becomes decertified by another test 

publisher or State that the test administrator will immediately notify all other test 

publishers or States for whom the test administrator administers ATB tests. 

We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take .5 hours (30 minutes) to 

review its process to obtain a certification statement from each prospective test 

administrator. We estimate that it will take each prospective test administrator .17 hours 

(10 minutes) to access, read, certify and submit the written certification to the test 
8

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

publisher or State, as applicable. We estimate that each test publisher or State, as 

applicable, will take .08 hours (5 minutes) to review each certification. 

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for Individuals (3,774 test administrators)

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

3,774 3,774 X .17 hours 642

Revised Burden for Individuals (1887 test administrators)

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

1,887 1,887 X .17 hours 321

Current Burden for For Profits process development

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

8 8 X 1 hour 8

Revised Burden for For Profits process review

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

4 4 X .5 hours 2

Current Burden for For Profits review of submitted certifications

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

3,774 3,774 X .08 hour 302

Revised Burden for For Profits review of submitted certifications

# of Responses: # of Respondents # of Burden Hours

1,887 1,887 X .08 hour 151

Section 668.150(b) (6) requires that the test publisher or State, respectively, immediately

notify the test administrator, the Secretary, and the institutions where the test 

administrator previously administered the ATB tests when it decertifies a test 

administrator. 

We estimate that 1 percent of the universe of test administrators or 19 test administrators 

will become decertified. We estimate that it will take test publishers and States 1 hour 

per decertification to notify the test administrators, the Secretary, and the affected 

institutions for a total of 19 hours of burden. 

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profits decertification process

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

Test publishers - 3,774 test administrators X .01 = 38

 38 38 X 1 hour = 38 hours
9

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

Revised Burden for For Profits decertification process

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

Test publishers - 1,887 test administrators X .01 = 19

 19 19 X 1 hour = 19 hours

Section 668.150(b)(7) requires that when the test publisher or State makes a 

determination that ATB tests have been improperly administered, the final regulations 

require that the affected students and prospective students must be notified by the 

respective test publisher or State. In addition, the final regulations require that the 

respective test publisher or State are required to provide a report to the Secretary on the 

results of their review and determination of improper ATB test administration, the 

notifications to the institutions, students and prospective students. 

We estimate that it will take each test publisher or State, as applicable, 3 hours to review

their process to determine when ATB tests have been improperly administered. We 

estimate that 240,882 ATB tests will be provided per year and estimate that 1 % of those 

tests could be improperly administered or 2,409 affected students or prospective students 

would require notification from the test publisher or State. We estimate that the 

notification process and any follow-up contact to average .33 hours (20 minutes) per 

contact and .25 hours (15 minutes) per student. 

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

 ATB test publishers to develop a process to determine when an ATB test has been 

improperly administered:

8 8 X 5 hours = 40 hours

 ATB test publisher immediate notification to affected students and prospective students 

of improper testing:

 4,818 4,818 X .25 hours = 1,205 hours

 Test publishers reporting to the Department the results of review and notification to 

institutions and students who have been improperly tested:

 4,818 4,818 X .33 hours = 1,590 hours

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

 ATB test publishers to review. process to determine when an ATB test has been 

improperly administered:

4 4 X 3 hours = 12 hours

 ATB test publisher immediate notification to affected students and prospective students 

of improper testing:

 2,409 2,409 X .25 hours = 602 hours

 Test publishers reporting to the Department the results of review and notification to 

institutions and students who have been improperly tested:

 2,409 2,409 X .33 hours = 795 hours

:
10

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

Section 668.150(b)(8) requires that when a test publisher or State, respectively, 

re-certifies a previously decertified test administrator after the three year decertification 

period, the final regulations require the test publisher or State to report to the Secretary

information on previously decertified test administrators that it re-certifies.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

 Test publishers:

 38 de-certifications X .02 % recertified = 1 recertification

after the 3-yr period

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

1 1 1

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

 Test publishers:

 19 de-certifications X .02 % recertified = 1 recertification

after the 3-yr period

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

1 1 1

Section 668.150(b)(13) requires to require that test publishers or a State analyze the test 

scores for all ATB test takers every 18 months to determine if there are any irregular 

patterns that raises an inference of improper test administration.

We estimate that a test publisher or State will on average take 75 hours to conduct its test 

anomaly process to establish its test anomaly analysis and report the results to the 

Secretary at the end of each 18-month period. That explanation must include its test 

irregularity detection process results, its corrective action process results, including its 

decertification of test administrator process results, as well as its reporting processes. 

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

8 approved ATB tests X 75 hours = 600 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

8 8 600

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

4 approved ATB tests X 75 hours = 300 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

4 4 300

Section 668.150(b)(15) requires that the test publisher or State immediately report to the 

Secretary if it finds any credible information indicating that the approved ATB test has 

been compromised.
11

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

We estimate 240,882 ATB tests will be taken each year, of that number we estimate that 

in .001 % of the tests or 241 cases will be compromised and therefore required to be 

reported to the Secretary. We estimate the collection of credible information and its 

reporting to the Secretary to take 1 hour per incidence.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests:

481,763 X .001 = 482 cases X 1 hour = 482 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

482 482 482

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests:

240,882 X .001 = 241 cases X 1 hour = 241 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

241 241 241

Section 668.150(b)(16) requires that the test publisher or State immediately report to the 

Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Education any credible information 

indicating that a test administrator or institution may have engaged in fraud or other 

criminal misconduct.

We estimate 240,882 ATB tests will be taken each year, of that number we estimate that 

in .001 % of the tests or 241 cases that will be credible information indicating that a test 

administrator or institution may have engaged in fraud or other criminal conduct. We 

estimate the collection of credible information and its reporting to the Office of the 

Inspector General to take 1 hour per incidence.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests:

481,763 X .001 = 482 cases X 1 hour = 482 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

482 482 482

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers data collection and reporting of compromised ATB tests:

240,882 X .001 = 241 cases X 1 hour = 241 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours

241 241 241

Section 668.150(b)(17) requires that all certified test administrators are required to report 

to the test publisher or State, respectively, the nature of the disability and any 

accommodations provided when approved ATB tests are given to individuals with 

disabilities.
12

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

We estimate that the average amount of time that a test publisher or State, as applicable, 

will take to review its process for having test administrators report the nature of the test 

taker’s disability and any accommodation provided to the individual with the disability to 

be 1 hours per test.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers:

8 tests X 2 hours for development & implementation = 16 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

8 8 16

Revised Burden for For Profit Sector

Test publishers:

4 tests X 1 hours for development & implementation = 4 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

4 4 4

Census information indicates that 12 % of the U.S. population is severely disabled, we 

estimate that 28,906 of the ATB test takers will be individuals with disabilities. We 

estimate that on average it will take .08 hours (5 minutes) per case to report the nature of 

the disability and any accommodation that the test administrator made for the test taker.

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current Burden for Individuals:

Test administrators:

481,763 ATB test takers X 12% with disabilities = 

57,812 cases X .08 hours per case reported = 4,625 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

57,812 57,812 4,625

Revised Burden for Individuals:

Test administrators:

240,882 ATB test takers X 12% with disabilities = 

28,906 cases X .08 hours per case reported = 2,312 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

28,906 28,906 2,312

Current Sub-total for 34 CFR 668.150:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

76,031 76,031 10,031

Revised Sub-total for 34 CFR 668.150:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

38,016 38,016 5,001
13

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

Section 668.151 – Administration of tests.

Section 668.151(g)(4) requires that institutions where approved ATB test are given by 

certified test administrators either at assessment centers or by an independent test 

administrators, maintain the name and address of the test administrator who administered 

the test. 

Section 668.151(g)(5) requires that if the individual who took the test has a disability and 

as a result was unable to be evaluated by the use of a conventional test or required test 

accommodations, that documentation of the individual’s disability and of the testing 

arrangements must be maintained by the institution.

We estimate that on average it will take an institution .08 hours (5 minutes) per ATB test 

to collect and maintain the identifier information on each test administrator for each ATB 

test provided, therefore we estimate a total burden of 19,271 hours (240,882 x .08). In 

addition, for the estimated 28,906 ATB test takers who are individuals with disabilities 

that it will take an additional .08 hours (5 minutes) per test taker to collect and maintain 

documentation on the individual’s disability and the testing accommodations that were 

made by the test administrator for the ATB test-taker for 2,313 hours (28,906 x .08)..

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Section 668.151(g)(4) –requirement that institutions maintain the identifier information 

for all certified ATB test administrators.

Current burden for For Profit Institutions 

481,763 ATB test takers X .36% (For Profit institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) = 173,445 X .08 hours = 13,876 hours 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

173,445 173,445 13,876

Revised burden for For Profit Institutions

240,882 ATB test takers X .38% (For Profit institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) = 91,535 X .08 hours = 7,323 hours 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

91,535 91,535 7,323

Current burden for Private Institutions

481,763 ATB test takers X .31% (Private Institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) = 149,347 X .08 hours = 11,948 hours 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

149,347 149,347 11,948

Revised burden for Private Institutions

240,882 ATB test takers X .38% (Private Institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) = 72,265 X .08 hours = 5,781hours 
14

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

72,265 72,265 5,781

Current burden for Public Institutions

481,763 ATB test takers X .33% (public institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) 158,962 X .08 hours = 12,717 hours 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

 158,962 158,962 12,717

Revised burden for Public Institutions

240,882 ATB test takers X .32% (Public Institutions as a percentage of all 

participating institutions) = 77,082 X .08 hours = 6,167 hours 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

77,082 77,082 6,167 

Section 668.151(g)(5) –requirement that institutions collect and maintain documentation 

of the individual ATB test-takers disability and of any accommodating provided by the 

certified test administrator to the ATB test-taker (668.151(g)(5)).

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current burden For Profit Institutions

57,812 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .36 

(proprietary institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 20,812 X .08 

hours per case reported = 1,665 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

20,812 20,812 1,665

Revised burden For Profit Institutions

28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .38 (proprietary 

institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 10,984 X .08 hours per case 

reported = 879 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

10,984 10,984 879

Current burden for Private Institutions

57,812 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .31 (private 

non-profit institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 17,922 X .08 

hours per case reported = 1,434 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

17,922 17,922 1,434

Revised burden for Private Institutions

28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .30 (proprietary

institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 8,672 X .08 hours per case 

reported = 694 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:
15

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

8,672 8,672 694

Current burden for Public Institutions

57,812 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .33 (public 

institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 19,078 X .08 hours per case 

reported = 1,526 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

19,078 19,078 1,526

Revised burden Public Institutions

28,906 cases of individuals with disabilities taking an ATB test X .32 (proprietary

institutions as a percentage of all participating institutions) 9,250 X .08 hours per case 

reported = 740 hours

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

9,250 9,250 740

SUB-TOTAL for 34 CFR 668.151:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

Current 539,566 539,566 43,166

Revised 269,788 269,788 21.584

Section 668.152 – Administration of tests by assessment centers.

The regulations require that if the test assessment center scores the approved ATB test 

that it must provide a copy of the completed test to the test publisher or State, as 

applicable, on a weekly basis to include either; the name, address, and any other identifier 

provided by the test publisher or State of the test administrator who administered the test; 

or a report of all test-takers’ scores and institutions to which the scores were sent and the 

name, address, and any other identifier provided by the test publisher or State of the test 

administrator who administered the test.

We estimate that of the 1,887 test administrators, approximately one-third or 629 are at 

test assessment centers. 

AFFECTED ENTITES and BURDEN:

Current burden for Private Institutions

We estimate that 18% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at private nonprofit institutions.

1,256 assessment centers X .18 = 226

X .08 hours (5 minutes)

X 52 weeks 

 equals 940 hours of additional burden.

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:
16

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

226 226 940

Revised burden for Private Institutions

We estimate that 18% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at private nonprofit institutions.

629 assessment centers X .18 = 113

X .08 hours (5 minutes)

X 52 weeks 

 equals 470 hours of additional burden.

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

113 113 470

Current burden for Public Institutions

We estimate that 82% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at public 

institutions.

1,256 assessment centers X .82 = 1,030 

X .08 hours (5 minutes)

X 52 weeks 

equals 4,285 hours of additional burden. 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

1,030 1,030 4,285

Revised burden for Public Institutions

We estimate that 82% of the test assessment centers giving ATB tests are at public 

institutions.

629 assessment centers X .82 = 516 

X .08 hours (5 minutes)

X 52 weeks 

 equals 2,147 hours of additional burden. 

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

516 516 2,147

SUB-TOTAL for 34 CFR 668.152:

# of Responses: # of Respondents: # of Burden Hours:

Current 1,256 1,256 5,225

Revised 629 629 2,617

Section 668.153 – Administration of tests for individuals whose native language is 

not English or for individuals with disabilities.

The regulations require that the test administrator must ensure that there is documentation 

to support the determination that the individual has a disability and requires 

accommodations, however, the burden associated with this final requirement is in the 

maintenance of the documentation by the institution in §668.151(g)(5) - see above.
17

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

Total Respondents, Responses and Burden Hours:

# of Respondents # of Responses # Hrs

Burden

Section 668.144 – Application for test approval.

12 12 314

Section 668.150 – Agreement between the Secretary and a test publisher or a State.

 38,016 38,016 5,001

Section 668.151 – Administration of tests.

 269,788 269,788 21,584

Section 668.152 – Administration of tests by assessment centers.

 629 629 2,617

Total

# of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours 

308,445 308,445 29,516

Current Inventory:

# of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours 

618,042 976,887 240,160

Net reduction 

# of Respondents # of Responses Burden Hours

-309,597 -668,442 -210,644

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers 

resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown 

in Items 12 and 14.)

 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost 

component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and 

maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account 

costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the 

information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors 

including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, 

the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and 

start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as 

purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing 

equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

 If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost 

burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information 

collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost 

burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), 
18

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing 

economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the 

information collection, as appropriate.

 Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions 

thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with 

requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to 

provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and 

usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly

costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost : 

Total Annual Costs (O&M) : 

____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested : 

There are no startup costs.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description 

of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational 

expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that 

would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may

aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

There are no additional costs to the Federal government as a result of the final 

regulations.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in 

burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an 

agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the 

reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a 

collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., 

changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes 

should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, 

and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, 

reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in 

burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

The burden decrease of 210,644 hours is due to statutory changes. The Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-74) changed the definition of Federal student 

aid eligibility criteria for students who do not have a high school diploma or its 

recognized equivalent as defined in Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as 

amended. As of July 1, 2012, the new law eliminated all but the completion of a 

homeschool program as an eligibility alternative previously available. Due to these 

changes, there is a decreasing pool of student applicants who would be eligible to take a 

Department approved ability to benefit exam to determine Title IV student aid eligibility. 

There has also been a decrease in the number of approved ability to benefit examinations 
19

ICRAS Tracking and OMB Number: (1423) 1845-0049 v8 Revised: 10/23/2013

RIN Number: XXXX-XXXX (if applicable)

as test publishers have notified the Department that they are voluntarily removing their 

examinations from being used for this purpose.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation 

and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time 

schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of 

information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

This information will not be published.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information 

collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

ED is not seeking this approval. The OMB number and expiration date will be announced 

in the Federal Register once approved by the Office of Management and Budget.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of 

Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certification.