alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1397n–13. Funding

Out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there is hereby appropriated $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2018 to carry out this division.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2064, as added Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title VIII, §50802(2), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 282.)
#### § 305.29 Required testing by designated laboratory.

Upon notification by the Commission or its designated representative, a manufacturer of a covered product shall supply, at the manufacturer's expense, no more than two of each model of each product to a laboratory, which will be identified by the Commission or its designated representative in the notice, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the estimated annual energy consumption, the estimated annual operating cost, or the energy efficiency rating, or the light output, energy usage and life ratings or, for general service fluorescent lamps, the color rendering index, disclosed on the label or fact sheet or in an industry directory, or, as required in a catalog, or the representation made by the label that the product is in compliance with applicable standards in section 325 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 6295, is accurate. Such a procedure will only be followed after the Commission or its staff has examined the underlying test data provided by the manufacturer as required by § 305.28(b) and after the manufacturer has been afforded the opportunity to reverify test results from which the estimated annual energy consumption, the estimated annual operating cost, or the energy efficiency rating for each basic model was derived, or the light output, energy usage and life ratings or, for general service fluorescent lamps, the color rendering index, for each basic model or lamp type was derived. A representative designated by the Commission shall be permitted to observe any reverification procedures required by this part, and to inspect the results of such reverification. The Commission will pay the charges for testing by designated laboratories.

[59 FR 67530, Dec. 29, 1994. Redesignated at 72 FR 49971, Aug. 29, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 49974, Aug. 29, 2007. Redesignated at 84 FR 58029, Oct. 30, 2019, as amended at 84 FR 58037, Oct. 30, 2019]
### §§1857f–1 to 1857f–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1857f–1, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §202, as added Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(8), 79 Stat. 992; amended Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 499; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §6(a), 84 Stat. 1690; June 22, 1974, Pub. L. 93–319, §5, 88 Stat. 258, which related to establishment of motor vehicle emission and fuel standards, was transferred to section 7521 of this title.

Section 1857f–2, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §203, as added Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(8), 79 Stat. 993; amended Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 499; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §§7(a), 11(a)(2)(A), 15(c)(2), 84 Stat. 1693, 1705, 1713, which related to prohibited acts with regard to motor vehicle emissions, was transferred to section 7522 of this title.

Section 1857f–3, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §204, as added Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(8), 79 Stat. 994; amended Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 500; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §7(b), 84 Stat. 1694, which related to subpenas and to jurisdiction of district courts to restrain violations, was transferred to section 7523 of this title.

Section 1857f–4, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §205, as added Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(8), 79 Stat. 994; amended Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 500; Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §7(c), 84 Stat. 1694, which related to penalties for violations, was transferred to section 7524 of this title.

Section 1857f–5, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §206, as added Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §8(a), 84 Stat. 1694, which related to motor vehicle and motor vehicle engine compliance testing and certification, was transferred to section 7525 of this title.
### subpart 2—[repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–358, title IX, §901(c)(1), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4044, struck out heading for subpart 2 "EXPERIENTIAL-BASED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES".
### §17144. OMB Government efficiency reports and scorecards

#### (a) Reports

Not later than April 1 of each year, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit an annual Government efficiency report to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate, which shall contain—

(1) a summary of the information reported by agencies under section 17143 of this title;

(2) an evaluation of the overall progress of the Federal Government toward achieving the goals of this title 1 and the amendments made by this title; 1 and

(3) recommendations for additional actions necessary to meet the goals of this title 1 and the amendments made by this title.1

#### (b) Scorecards

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall include in any annual energy scorecard the Director is otherwise required to submit a description of the compliance of each agency with the requirements of this title 1 and the amendments made by this title.1

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §528, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title V of Pub. L. 110–140, which enacted this subchapter, part D (§8279) of subchapter III of chapter 91 of this title, and sections 1824, 2162a, and 2169 of Title 2, The Congress, amended sections 6325, 6834, 8256, 8258, 8259b, 8287, and 8287c of this title, section 2162 of Title 2, section 2913 of Title 10, Armed Forces, section 3203 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and section 2621 of Title 16, Conservation, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 8259b of this title. For complete classification of title V to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2019. Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.

1 See References in Text note below.
Order entered February 28, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00715-CR

ADRIAN V. BARRERA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F07-30801-P

ORDER

On February 8, 2013, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal. In response, the District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing a letter 

stating that the office “is not able to comply with the [C]ourt’s order” because it is not in 

possession of the certification.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal that accurately reflects the trial court’s proceedings and to deliver the certification for 

filing with this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the following:

• Honorable Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court;
• Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk;

• Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division; and

• Counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4031 

To provide that claims presented to an Indian Health Service contracting 

officer pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act on or before October 31, 2005, involving claims that accrued 

after October 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, shall 

be deemed timely presented. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2012 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. COLE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide that claims presented to an Indian Health Service 

contracting officer pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act on or before 

October 31, 2005, involving claims that accrued after 

October 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, 

shall be deemed timely presented. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TIMELY PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, claims 

5 presented to an Indian Health Service contracting officer 

6 pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Education 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4031 IH

1 Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) on or before Octo2 ber 31, 2005, involving claims that accrued after October 

3 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, shall be 

4 deemed timely presented. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §13109. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator $8,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993 for functions carried out under this chapter (other than State Grants),1 and $8,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993, for grant programs to States issued pursuant to section 13104 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6610, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–327.)

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                September 30, 2005 as filed on the date hereof with the Securities                and                Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  November 14, 2005 |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
|                                      |   |
| /s/                  Chang H. Ahn         |   |
| Chang                  H. Ahn             |   |
| Chief                  Executive Officer  |   |

----
#### Moussa Ousmane et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[820 NYS2d 803]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered April 25, 2005, unanimously withdrawn. Motion seeking leave to withdraw appeal granted. No opinion. Order filed. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed September 10, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00748
- CV
EX PARTE: ELIZUR GON ZAGA On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. X14
- 399
- V 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis In a letter dated July 30, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. Specificall y, there did not appear to be a final judgment. We instructed appellant to file, by August 18, 2014, a letter brief addressing our jurisdictional concern. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a letter brief within the time requested may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a jurisdictional brief. Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See
Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 20 01). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. Id

. In appellant’s notice of appeal, he stated that he is appealing the trial court’s judgment signed on May 27, 2014. The clerk’s record does not contain any such document. It does contain a general denial filed by the District Attorney’s Office on that date. The general denial, however, is a pleading, not an appealable order.– 2

– The record before this Court does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order.
For th is reason, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

140748F.P05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

EX PARTE: ELIZUR GONZAGA

No. 05

- 14

- 00748

- CV On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. X14

- 399

- V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. Justices Francis and Myers, participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, Elizur Gonzaga.

Judgment entered this 10th day of September, 2014.
### subpart 6—transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subpart 6 of part E of title IV of act July 1, 1944, comprising this subpart, was renumbered subpart 20 of part C of title IV by Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10334(c)(1)(A)–(C), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 973, and is classified to subpart 20 (§285t et seq.) of part C of this subchapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.12b-20 Additional information.

In addition to the information expressly required to be included in a statement or report, there shall be added such further material information, if any, as may be necessary to make the required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made not misleading.

(Secs. 4, 16, 19, 24, 48 Stat. 77, 896, 85, as amended, 901; 15 U.S.C. 77d, 78p, 77s, 78x)

[30 FR 2023, Feb. 13, 1965]
### §17202. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the programs under this part $170,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §623, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1684; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3002(j), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2495.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 2008 to 2012.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
#### Ehag Eisenbahnwerte Holding Artiengesellschaft, Appellant, v. Banca Nationala a Romaniei, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of the Special Term, entered September 17, 1952, vacating the warrant of attachment, properly made ? Stay granted in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, dated June 4, 1953. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 697.]
No: 14-052 August 21, 2014

CONTACT: Dave McIntrye, 301-415-8200 

NRC Names Daniel H. Dorman as Region I Administrator

Daniel H. Dorman, a 23-year veteran of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has been named 

the new administrator of the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. He succeeds William M. 

“Bill” Dean, who will begin his new assignment as director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation (NRR) in Rockville, Md., in October. 

Dorman will assume his new position within the next few 

months. In the interim, David Lew, who is the deputy regional 

administrator for Region I, will serve as acting regional administrator.

“Dan Dorman is exceptionally well qualified to lead Region I in 

carrying out our mission to protect people and the environment,” said 

Mark Satorius, the NRC’s executive director for operations. “He has 

repeatedly demonstrated a strong safety focus and an exemplary 

commitment to technical and managerial excellence in a wide variety of 

leadership assignments throughout the agency. The experience he has 

gained will serve the agency and the public well.” 

Dorman joined the NRC in 1991 as a Project Engineer in NRR. 

In 2001, he was selected for the Senior Executive Service and has held 

progressively more responsible leadership positions in engineering research, nuclear security, and fuel 

cycle safety and safeguards. He has served as deputy office director in both the nuclear materials and 

nuclear reactor programs. On June 30, 2014, he was appointed to his current position as acting director 

of NRR.

In 2011, Dorman went to Japan as part of the initial U.S. response to the accident at the 

Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. He subsequently participated in the NRC’s senior manager 

review of the insights from the accident, which has served as the basis of substantial safety 

improvements being implemented at all U.S. nuclear power plants. He has also represented the United 

States as an officer of the Convention on Nuclear Safety, promoting the safety lessons of the 

Fukushima accident worldwide.

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Dorman served in the U.S. Navy’s nuclear power program. He 

received a bachelor’s degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the Webb Institute of 

Naval Architecture. He received the NRC’s Meritorious Service Award in 1998 and the Presidential 

Rank Meritorious Executive award in 2008.
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.15c2-4 Transmission or maintenance of payments received in connection with underwritings. It shall constitute a “fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act or practice” as used in section 15(c)(2) of the Act, for any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer participating in any distribution of securities, other than a firm-commitment underwriting, to accept any part of the sale price of any security being distributed unless: ( a ) The money or other consideration received is promptly transmitted to the persons entitled thereto; or
( b ) If the distribution is being made on an “all-or-none” basis, or on any other basis which contemplates that payment is not to be made to the person on whose behalf the distribution is being made until some further event or contingency occurs, ( 1 ) the money or other consideration received is promptly deposited in a separate bank account, as agent or trustee for the persons who have the beneficial interests therein, until the appropriate event or contingency has occurred, and then the funds are promptly transmitted or returned to the persons entitled thereto, or
( 2 ) all such funds are promptly transmitted to a bank which has agreed in writing to hold all such funds in escrow for the persons who have the beneficial interests therein and to transmit or return such funds directly to the persons entitled thereto when the appropriate event or contingency has occurred.
[41 FR 22826, June 7, 1976]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRotor CFD Analysis at Terrestrial and Martian Atmospheric DensitiesMuch effort has been made to enhance exploration on Mars. In addition to a rover and Mars-orbiting satellites, a Mars helicopter (MH) was proposed in order to augment planetary research. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations have been performed to have a better understanding of the behavior and performance of vertical lift Planetary Aerial Vehicles (PAV). Due to the large differences in atmospheric conditions between Mars and Earth, predicting and testing rotorcraft performance is a complex task. The goal of this project is to understand the capability of the mid-fidelity CFD software RotCFD to predict rotor performance in terms of thrust at 1013.25 milibar and 14 milibar corresponding to Terrestrial and Martian conditions, respectively. Also, in order to characterize the wind tunnel wall effects free field and wind tunnel simulations were performed, analyzed and compared. Different analytical tools have been used in order to aid with the design process for the future vertical lift planetary aerial vehicles. One of them includes experimental tests performed on a rotor in the Aeolian Wind Tunnel (AWT) facility at NASA Ames Research Center under different pressure conditions ranging from Terrestrial to Martian atmospheric conditions. Other software was used as well in order to capture the aerodynamic coefficients of the corresponding rotor sections based on the Mach and Reynolds numbers used for the experimental tests. The aerodynamic coefficients were input into RotCFD, and various simulations were performed under Terrestrial and Martian conditions in order to mimic the experimental test. Then, the obtained results from RotCFD were compared with the AWT collected data.Document ID20190001482Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPerez Perez, Brenda Natalia*(Science and Technology Corp. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 12, 2019Publication DateSeptember 1, 2018Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN53293NASA/CR-2018-219780Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA16BD60CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsAtmospheric PressuresMarsComprehensive AnalysesEarthRotorAvailable DownloadsNameType20190001482.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### §§ 160.19-160.29 [Reserved]