alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Company Plant**  **Source Source ID** 

FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Middle Melter Middle Melter FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Electric steel shellWest Melter FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Forming, Oven, Cooling Batt Line (BL) FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Forming Unbonded Line (UL)

FiberTEK Nephi, UT Electric steel shellMiddle Melter FiberTEK Nephi, UT Electric steel shellWest Melter FiberTEK Nephi, UT Forming, curing, cooling BL FiberTEK Nephi, UT Forming UL**Control method Stack ID**  **Stack Height (ft) Stack Diameter (ft)** 

Baghouse Middle Melter Baghouse 25 1.5 Baghouse West Melter Baghouse 25 1.5 Scrubber 1, 2, and 4 Main Stack 140 9 Scrubber 3 Main Stack 140 9

Baghouse Middle Melter Baghouse Baghouse West Melter Baghouse Scrubber 1, 2, & 4 Main Stack Scrubber 3 Main Stack**Notes/ Questions**

Common stack for bonded and non-bonded product? Do each of these sources have their own stack? Fibertek Lakeland, FL and Nephi, UT have common stacks for bonded and unbonded lines, including forming for both unbonded (1 scrubber) and bonded lines(2 scrubbers), Oven and Cooling(1 scrubber) on bonded line. Each Melter Baghouse has its own stack.Main Stack

WestMelter BaghouseMain Stack

MiddleMelter Baghouse
No: III-15-017 June 9, 2015

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Schedules Open House June 18 to Discuss

Performance of Fermi Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold an open house June 18 to discuss the 

agency’s assessment of the Fermi Power Plant’s performance during 2014. The plant is located in 

Newport, Mich., about 55 miles northeast of Toledo, Ohio, and is operated by DTE Electric Company.

The open house is scheduled for 6 to 7 p.m. EDT at the Monroe County Courthouse Board of 

Commissioners’ Chambers, 125 E. Second St., in Monroe, Mich. The NRC staff will be available for 

informal one-on-one discussions about the performance of the Fermi plant and other topics related to 

the NRC’s regulatory activities.

“These open houses give the public a chance to talk informally with our staff about the plant 

and other NRC-related issues,” said NRC Region III Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson. “It is a great 

opportunity for people to meet our resident inspectors and other staff; and a great opportunity for us to 

interact with people who live near the plant.”

The NRC concluded that Fermi operated safely last year.

NRC inspectors identified one or more greater-than-green findings in the security area in the 

first quarter of 2014. As a result, the plant received an increased level of inspection and oversight

throughout 2014. NRC inspectors made sure the plant immediately addressed potential vulnerabilities. 

After conducting a follow-up inspection in the last quarter of 2014, NRC determined that the plant has 

resolved the issues and returned the plant to the regular level of NRC oversight. 

This year, Fermi will continue to receive the detailed routine inspections conducted at all 

nuclear power plants. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to 

the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s 

headquarters in Rockville, Md. Some of the areas to be inspected this year are license renewal, problem 

identification and resolution, and radiation protection.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,” 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical 

measurements of plant and equipment performance. 
Page | 2

The NRC’s 2014 assessment letter and current performance information for Fermi is available 

on the NRC website.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26786]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION


Public Meeting

AGENCY: Antitrust Modernization Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Antitrust Modernization Commission will hold a public 
meeting on January 13, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is for the 
Antitrust Modernization Commission to determine issues for further 
Commission study, pursuant to its statutory mandate.

DATES: January 13, 2005, 10 a.m. until adjourned. Interested members of 
the public may attend. Registration is not required.

ADDRESSES: Federal Trade Commission, Conference Center Rooms A & B, 601 
New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Heimert, Executive Director 
& General Counsel, Antitrust Modernization Commission: telephone: (202) 
233-0701; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcd5d2dad3fcddd1df92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce5e2eae3ccede1efa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>. Mr. Heimert is also the Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO) for the Antitrust Modernization Commission.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Antitrust Modernization Commission to select issues for further 
Commission study, pursuant to its statutory mandate. Materials relating 
to the meeting will be made available on the Commission's Web site 
(http://www.amc.gov) in advance of the meeting.
    The AMC has called this meeting pursuant to its authorizing statute 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Antitrust Modernization 
Commission Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-273, Sec.  11058(f), 116 Stat. 
1758, 1857; Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., Sec.  
10(a)(2); 41 CFR 102-3.150 (2003).

    Dated: December 1, 2004.

    By direction of Deborah A. Garza, Chair of the Antitrust 
Modernization Commission.

    Approved by Designated Federal Officer.
Andrew J. Heimert,
Executive Director & General Counsel, Antitrust Modernization 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-26786 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-YM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 201.1100 Creation of Fair Fund.

In any agency process initiated by an order instituting proceedings in which the Commission or the hearing officer issues an order requiring the payment of disgorgement by a respondent and also assessing a civil money penalty against that respondent, the Commission or the hearing officer may order that the amount of disgorgement and of the civil penalty, together with any funds received pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7246(b), be used to create a fund for the benefit of investors who were harmed by the violation.

[70 FR 72570, Dec. 5, 2005]
§ 162.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to implement various provisions in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681, *et seq.* (“FCRA”), which provide certain protections to consumer information.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to certain consumer information held by the entities listed below. This part shall apply to futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, major swap participants and swap dealers, regardless of whether they are required to register with the Commission. This part does not apply to foreign futures commission merchants, foreign retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, major swap participants and swap dealers unless such entity registers with the Commission. Nothing in this part modifies limits or supersedes the requirements set forth in part 160 of this title.
( c ) *Examples.* The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part. Examples in a section illustrate only the issue described in the section and do not illustrate any other issue that may arise in this part.
### §17203. International geothermal energy development

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Energy, in coordination with other appropriate Federal and multilateral agencies (including the United States Agency for International Development) shall support collaborative efforts with international partners to promote the research, development, and demonstration of geothermal technologies used to develop hydrothermal and enhanced geothermal system resources.

#### (b) United States Trade and Development Agency

The Director of the United States Trade and Development Agency may—

(1) encourage participation by United States firms in actions taken to carry out subsection (a); and

(2) provide grants and other financial support for feasibility and resource assessment studies conducted in, or intended to benefit, less developed countries.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VI, §624, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1684; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3002(k), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2495.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–260, §3002(k)(1), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary of Energy, in coordination with other appropriate Federal and multilateral agencies (including the United States Agency for International Development) shall support international collaborative efforts to promote the research, development, and deployment of geothermal technologies used to develop hydrothermal and enhanced geothermal system resources, including as partners (as appropriate) the African Rift Geothermal Development Facility, Australia, China, France, the Republic of Iceland, India, Japan, and the United Kingdom."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–260, §3002(k)(2), struck out subsec. (c). Text read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
No: I-13-043 December 5, 2013

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610-337-5300

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331

NRC to Hold Open House, Meeting Dec. 18 in Hampton, N.H., to Discuss

Reviews of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant Concrete Degradation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public open house and a public 

meeting for Dec. 18 to discuss work being performed by the owner of the Seabrook nuclear power plant 

to address concrete degradation at the facility. The plant is located in Seabrook, N.H., and is owned and 

operated by NextEra.

The sessions, which were rescheduled from Oct. 9 due to the federal government shutdown, will 

be held at the Best Western Plus – The Inn at Hampton, at 815 Lafayette Road in Hampton, N.H. The 

open house will begin at 5 p.m. and allow for one-on-one discussions between NRC staff and members 

of the public on the topic. During the formal meeting, set to start at 6 p.m., NRC staff and NextEra will 

discuss the subject. The second part of the meeting will provide an opportunity for audience members 

to ask questions of the NRC staff.

“We have held earlier meetings in the vicinity of the Seabrook plant on this subject, which 

helped the public to better understand this issue and provided valuable feedback to the NRC,” NRC 

Region I Administrator Bill Dean said. “The meeting on December 18 will afford another opportunity 

for members of the public to learn the status of our reviews in this area and the company’s activities to 

deal with this issue, as well as provide audience members with a chance to once again share their 

perspectives.”

The concrete degradation at Seabrook is caused by alkali silica reaction, or ASR. This is a 

chemical combining of reactive silica from the concrete aggregate with the alkali from the cement paste 

in the presence of moisture. (Aggregates are inert granular materials, such as sand, gravel or crushed 

stone that, along with water and cement paste, are an essential ingredient in concrete.) The result of the 

reaction is a gel, which can expand and cause micro-cracks in the concrete.

After the ASR problem was identified at the plant in 2010, the NRC in May 2012 issued a 

Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) to NextEra confirming that it would complete a variety of actions in 

response to the condition. On Oct. 9, 2013, the NRC announced that the CAL was being closed out 

after the agency confirmed through inspections that the actions committed to by the company were 

being met.
Page | 2

While NRC inspections have determined that ASR-affected structures at the plant remain 

capable of performing their safety functions, the NRC will continue to provide focused oversight of the 

company’s ongoing actions to resolve the issue. This includes NRC review of the results of the testing 

program being conducted at the University of Texas-Austin, as well as of the on-site monitoring of 

ASR progression in the plant’s concrete structures. 

More information about the NRC’s reviews of Seabrook concrete degradation can be found on 

an agency webpage devoted to that topic.
Part 5350 - Extraordinary Contractual

Actions and the Safety Act

DAFFARS PART 5350 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

See PM 22-C-05 Revision 1, Implementing Guidance: Managing the Effects of Inflation with Existing

Contracts

Subpart 5350.1 — GENERAL

5350.101-1 Authority

Subpart 5350.102 — DELEGATION OF AND LIMITATIONS ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY

5350.102-1-70 Delegations

5350.102-2 Contract Adjustment Boards

Subpart 5350.103 — CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS

5350.103-5 Processing Cases

Subpart 5350.104 — RESIDUAL POWERS

5350.104-3 (b)(1) Action on Indemnification Requests

Subpart 5350.1 — GENERAL

5350.101-1 Authority

(b) The authorities, policies, and procedures established in this part are based on the authority of

HAF MD 1-10, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition).

Subpart 5350.102 — DELEGATION OF AND LIMITATIONS

ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY

5350.102-1-70 Delegations

(a) The DAS(C) is authorized to deny or approve any request for contract adjustment under FAR 50

and take any action pursuant to FAR 50.103-2(b) or FAR 50.103-2(c), including the authority to

modify or release unaccrued obligations of any sort and to extend delivery and performance dates

for amounts not exceeding $75,000.
5350.102-2 Contract Adjustment Boards

The Department of the Air Force Contract Adjustment Board (DAFCAB) is authorized to deny or

approve any request for contract adjustment more than $75,000.

Subpart 5350.103 — CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS

5350.103-5 Processing Cases

(a) All requests for relief and all related documents, certifications, correspondence, reports, files,

and a proposed memorandum of decision must be forwarded through the SCO for submission to the

approving official.

(b) The DAFCAB serves as the exclusive point of contact with other military departments, or other

departments or agencies of the Government, relative to the exercise of authority under Public Law

85-804.

Subpart 5350.104 — RESIDUAL POWERS

5350.104-3 (b)(1) Action on Indemnification Requests

See the Indemnification Guide for Unusually Hazardous or Nuclear Risks for additional information.

Upon completion of all buying activity coordination, the contracting officer must forward the

indemnification request through the SCO to the cognizant HCA Workflow to for staffing to the

SECAF.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 71063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, HIV Clinical Research Management 
Support.
    Date: January 10-11, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Key Bridge Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 
22209.
    Contact Person: Nancy B. Saunders, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 3134, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 435-3569, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#19776a786c777d7c6b6a59777078707d37777071377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81eff2e0f4efe5e4f3f2c1efe8e0e8e5afefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-26891 Filed 12-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries


  Subsidiaries of Registrant                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
  --------------------------                      -----------------------------
SpeechWorks International Holdings, Inc.           Delaware
SpeechWorks Technology (Canada), Inc.              Canada
SpeechWorks (BVI) Ltd.                             British Virgin Islands
SpeechWorks Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.                 Singapore
SpeechWorks U.K. Ltd                               United Kingdom
SpeechWorks Europe B.V.                            Netherlands
SpeechWorks Japan K.K.                             Japan
SpeechWorks France S.A.S.                          France
SpeechWorks Deutchland GmbH                        Germany
SpeechWorks Securities Corporation                 Massachusetts
SpeechWorks Acquisition Sub, Inc.                  New York
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ouseley Crichlow, Appellant.

[819 NYS2d 665]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 18, 2003 *(People v Crichlow,*302 AD2d 537 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 14, 2000. By decision and order of this Court dated November 22, 2004 *(People v Crichlow,*12 AD3d 616 [2004]), the application was denied. By decision and order of this Court dated February 28, 2005 *(People v Crichlow,*15 AD3d 674 [2005]), the appellant was granted leave to reargue the application, and, upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court dated November 22, 2004, was recalled and vacated. This Court directed further briefing and the application was held in abeyance in the interim.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The key issue presented by this application is whether the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of this case, viewed in *481totality and as of the time of appellate counsel’s representation of the appellant, reveal that appellate counsel provided “meaningful representation” to the appellant *(People v Larkins,*10 AD3d 694, 694 [2004], quoting *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; see *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277, 284 [2004]). We conclude that this standard was satisfied in this case and, accordingly, we deny the application (see *People v Chapman,*27 AD3d 574 [2006]). Prudenti, P.J., Crane, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.
§ 148.5 Standards for awards. ( a ) A prevailing applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with an adjudicatory proceeding, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, unless the position of the Commission was substantially justified. The position of the Commission includes, in addition to the position taken by the Commission in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the Commission upon which the adversary adjudication is based. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible prevailing applicant is on the Commission.
( b ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the adjudicatory proceeding or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
[46 FR 57671, Nov. 25, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 18880, May 23, 1986]
[Criminal No. 70.]

#### Ex Parte: In the Matter of GEORGE W. YOUNG, Petitioner.

APPLICATION for a writ of habeas corpus.

Harris Baldwin, for Petitioner.

Attorney-General, for Territory.

February 2, 1891.

Writ granted.
### §15261. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15261 was editorially reclassified as section 50331 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §13491. Purposes and definitions

#### (a) Purposes

The purposes of this part are—

(1) to require the Secretary to carry out civilian nuclear programs in a way that will lead toward the commercial availability of advanced nuclear reactor technologies; and

(2) to authorize such activities to further the timely availability of advanced nuclear reactor technologies, including technologies that utilize standardized designs or exhibit passive safety features.

#### (b) Definitions

For purposes of this part—

(1) the term "advanced nuclear reactor technologies" means—

(A) advanced light water reactors that may be commercially available in the near-term, including but not limited to mid-sized reactors with passive safety features for the generation of commercial electric power from nuclear fission; and

(B) other advanced nuclear reactor technologies that may require prototype demonstration prior to commercial availability in the mid- or long-term, including but not limited to high-temperature, gas-cooled reactors and liquid metal reactors, for the generation of commercial electric power from nuclear fission;

(2) the term "Commission" means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission;

(3) the term "standardized design" means a design for a nuclear power plant that may be utilized for a multiple number of units or a multiple number of sites; and

(4) the term "certification" means approval by the Commission of a standardized design.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2121, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle" meaning subtitle C of title XXI of Pub. L. 102–486, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3081, which enacted this part and amended sections 12003 and 12004 of this title.