alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3779 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3779

To hold accountable Federal departments and agencies that fail to meet 
   goals relating to the participation of small business concerns in 
procurement contracts, to authorize Federal departments and agencies to 
  give preference to small business concerns when procuring goods or 
                   services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2012

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To hold accountable Federal departments and agencies that fail to meet 
   goals relating to the participation of small business concerns in 
procurement contracts, to authorize Federal departments and agencies to 
  give preference to small business concerns when procuring goods or 
                   services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Growth and Federal 
Accountability Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION IN PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS.

    (a) Consequence for Failure To Meet Goal.--If a Federal department 
or agency does not meet a covered goal with respect to a fiscal year, 
that department or agency, in the succeeding fiscal year, may not 
expend for the procurement of goods or services an amount that is 
greater than 90 percent of the amount expended for the procurement of 
goods or services in the fiscal year with respect to which that 
department or agency did not meet the covered goal.
    (b) Preference.--To meet a covered goal, the head of a Federal 
department or agency may give preference to a small business concern 
when procuring goods or services.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Covered goal.--The term ``covered goal'' means a goal 
        established by the head of a Federal department or agency--
                    (A) under section 15(g) of the Small Business Act 
                (15 U.S.C. 644(g)); and
                    (B) relating to the participation of small business 
                concerns in the procurement contracts of that 
                department or agency.
            (2) Small business concern.--The term ``small business 
        concern'' has the meaning given that term under section 3(a) of 
        the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)).
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6390

SHAWN M. RICE
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

BRYAN ANTONELLI
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 5:20

- cv

- 00234

- JPB )

Submitted : September 30, 2021 Decided: October 13, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shawn M. Rice , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Shawn M. Rice , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order a dopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Rice’s 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which Rice sought to challenge his conviction by way of the
savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his
conviction in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion
would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law.

In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333

- 34 (4th Cir. 2000).
We have reviewed the record and, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Greer

v. United States , 141 S. Ct. 2090 (2021), find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2010-0490 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-037-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-70A and S-70C Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 5

Airworthiness Directive to require ultrasonic test (UT) inspection of the tail gearbox output bevel 

gear (gear) for a crack. If you find a crack, replacing the gear with an airworthy gear is required.

Costs:

The actions will take about 4 work hours per helicopter at an average labor rate of $85 per work 

hour. Required parts will cost about $20,000 for each gear. Based on these figures, we estimate 

the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators to be $101,700, assuming the gear is replaced 

on the entire fleet.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Terry Fahr
Denied and Opinion Filed November 4, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01069-CV

IN RE SHANNELL Y. RICHARDS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-50782-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Before the Court is relator’s September 4, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus, real party 

in interest’s October 6, 2019 response to the petition, and relator’s October 8, 2019 reply. In her 

petition, relator requests that we direct the trial court to vacate the June 8, 2018 agreed final decree 

of divorce and issue a judgment in accordance with the parties’ December 20, 2018 agreed 

amendment to the mediated settlement agreement. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show both that the trial court has clearly 

abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. 

of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition for 

writ of mandamus, the response filed by real party, relator’s reply, and the applicable law, we 

conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the 
–2–

petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

191069f.p05

/Bill Pedersen, III//

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
C E N T R O S D E S E R V I C I O S D E M E D I C A R E Y M E D I C A I D

¡Revise sus reclamaciones 

de Medicare con tiempo!
Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid

CMS Producto No. 11492-S

Junio 2011

¡Revise con tiempo!

¿Sabía usted que puede visitar

www.MiMedicare.gov o llamar al sistema telefónico 

automatizado del 1-800-MEDICARE 

(1-800-633-4227) para revisar sus reclamaciones de 

Medicare? Generalmente, sus reclamaciones están disponible 24 horas después 

de ser tramitadas. Los usuarios de TTY deben llamar al 1-877-486-2048.

¡Mientras más pronto revise y reporte los errores, con más rapidez se 

podrá detener el fraude!

Visite www.www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/11491-S.pdf para 

aprender cómo revisar sus reclamaciones en línea o usando el sistema telefónico 

automatizado del 1-800-MEDICARE. Visite www.stopmedicarefraud.gov para 

obtener más información sobre cómo protegerse del fraude hacia Medicare y 

obtener consejos para detectar y reportar el fraude.

www.stopmedicarefraud.gov
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Yreka, California, February 16, 2004. The meeting will include routine 
business, a discussion of larger scale projects, and the review and 
recommendation for implementation of submitted project proposals.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 16, 2004, from 4 p.m. until 7 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, 
Preece Way, Yreka, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Hall, RAC Coordinator, Klamath 
National Forest, (530) 841-4468 or electronically at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debab1b0bfb2bab6bfb2b29eb8adf0b8bbbaf0abad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f0fbfaf5f8f0fcf5f8f8d4f2e7baf2f1f0bae1e7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: February 3, 2004.
Margaret J. Boland,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 04-2673 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472 

From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 

Re: July 27, 2008 Automotive News Article – “Japan's new diet plan: Slim down, ounce by ounce” 

A hard copy of the July 27, 2008 Automotive News Article entitled “Japan's new diet plan: Slim down, 

ounce by ounce” is available within EPA’s Docket Center. 

This document has been copyrighted and is not available in the electronic docket. Parties that wish to 

view a hard copy of this document can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, 

Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742. 

The article provides details on the curb-weight reduction plans of for Nissan, Toyota, Honda and Mazda 

in the 2011-2015 timeframe based upon interviews with Mitsuhiko Yamashita, Executive Vice 

President, Research & Development, Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.; Masatami Takimoto, Executive Vice 

President and Member of the Board, Toyota Motor Corporation; Takeo Fukui, President, Honda Motor 

Co. Ltd. and Seita Kanai, Director, Research and Development, Mazda Motor Corp.
507.7104 Executive Agent Designations

(a) General.

(1)OMB issues executive agent designations to Federal agencies to establish and operate GWACs,

per 40 U.S.C. § 11302.

(2)OMB may issue executive agent designations to Federal agencies to establish and operate certain

other programs consistent with applicable statutory requirements.

(3)OMB requires an alternative of analysis (see 507.7103) or business case (see 507.7103) as part of

their executive agent designation review process.

(b) Exceptions. Any statute that designates an executive agent does not require a request to OMB,

including the GSA AutoChoice Program (Pub. L. 107-217, Aug. 21, 2002) and GSA City Pair Program

(CPP) (Pub. L. 96-192, Feb. 15, 1980).

(c) Timeframe for development. An executive agent designation shall generally be developed no less

than 18-24 months prior to award (see FAR 17.502-1(b) for additional details). Prior to developing an

executive agent designation request, the contracting officer shall follow their Service-level

procedures and the process in subpart 504.71 for purposes of notifying the SPE and, if applicable,

scheduling an acquisition review.

(d) Coordination. The contracting officer shall coordinate with the Service-level acquisition policy

organization, the category manager(s), and OSDBU when developing an executive agent designation

request.

(e) Approval. OMB approves executive agent designations. The Administrator must approve an

executive agent designation request prior to its submission to OMB.

Parent topic: Subpart 507.71 - Category Management
§ 230.404 Preparation of registration statement. ( a ) A registration statement shall consist of the facing sheet of the applicable form; a prospectus containing the information called for by Part I of such form; the information, list of exhibits, undertakings and signatures required to be set forth in Part II of such form; financial statements and schedules; exhibits; any other information or documents filed as part of the registration statement; and all documents or information incorporated by reference in the foregoing (whether or not required to be filed).
( b ) All general instructions, instructions to items of the form, and instructions as to financial statements, exhibits, or prospectuses are to be omitted from the registration statement in all cases.
( c ) The prospectus shall contain the information called for by all of the items of Part I of the applicable form, except that unless otherwise specified, no reference need be made to inapplicable items, and negative answers to any item in Part I may be omitted. A copy of the prospectus may be filed as a part of the registration statement in lieu of furnishing the information in item-and-answer form. Wherever a copy of the prospectus is filed in lieu of information in item-and-answer form, the text of the items of the form is to be omitted from the registration statement, as well as from the prospectus, except to the extent provided in paragraph (d) of this rule.
( d ) Where any items of a form call for information not required to be included in the prospectus, generally Part II of such form, the text of such items, including the numbers and captions thereof, together with the answers thereto shall be filed with the prospectus under cover of the facing sheet of the form as a part of the registration statement. However, the text of such items may be omitted provided the answers are so prepared as to indicate the coverage of the item without the necessity of reference to the text of the item. If any such item is inapplicable, or the answer thereto is in the negative, a statement to that effect shall be made. Any financial statements not required to be included in the prospectus shall also be filed as a part of the registration statement proper, unless incorporated by reference pursuant to Rule 411 (§ 230.411).
[47 FR 11435, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 39763, July 24, 1997; 76 FR 71876, Nov. 21, 2011]
### §12640. Engagement of participants

A State shall not engage a participant to serve in any program that receives assistance under this subchapter unless and until amounts have been appropriated under section 12681 of this title for the provision of national service educational awards and for the payment of other necessary expenses and costs associated with such participant.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §180, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3166; Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §119, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 866.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 substituted "national service educational awards" for "post-service benefits".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT JOSHUA T. GROOMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-4144 December 15, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Stephen Mathew Whyte, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SLEET, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SMITH, JJ., Concur.



### __________________________2



### Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### John Adikes and Thomas Adikes, Appellants, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of *Merrihew*v. *Kingsbury*(150 App. Div. 40), and motion granted upon payment of costs to date of motion, and upon the further condition that plaintiffs consent to try the cause at the June term if defendant so elects. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment #1) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report'), James W. Creamer III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                    /s/ James W. Creamer III
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    James W. Creamer III,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

Dated: JULY 11, 2006
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22
- 0584 IN RE THE MARIAGE OF: LORI DELOIS GUENTHNER,

Petitioner and Appellee, and NEAL WAYNE GUENTHNER,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Matthew B. Gallinger,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this November 1, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Neal Wayne Guenthner, Adrian M. Gosch, Matthew B. Gallinger 11/01/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0584
### §11316. Transfer of functions

#### (a) Transfers from HHS Task Force

The Council shall be the successor to the Federal Task Force on the Homeless of the Department of Health and Human Services. The property, records, and undistributed program funds of the Task Force shall be transferred to the Council.

#### (b) Termination of HHS Task Force

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall terminate the Federal Task Force on the Homeless of the Department of Health and Human Services as soon as practicable following the first meeting of the Council.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title II, §206, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 489.)
### §1542. Transfer of funds from other Federal agencies to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

Where any Federal agency has funds for the provision of housing in connection with national-defense activities it may, in its discretion, make transfers of those funds, in whole or in part, to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and the funds so transferred shall be available for, but only for, any or all of the objects and purposes of and in accordance with all the authority and limitations contained in subchapters II to VII of this chapter, and for administrative expenses in connection therewith.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title III, §302, formerly §5, 54 Stat. 1127; renumbered title III, §302, June 28, 1941, ch. 260, §4(b), 55 Stat. 363; amended Ex. Ord. No. 9070, §1, eff. Feb. 24, 1942, 7 F.R. 1529; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73; Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapters III and VI of this chapter, referred to in text, were comprised of sections 1531 to 1536 and 1571 to 1576, respectively, of this title and have been omitted from the Code. For further details, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Housing and Home Finance Administrator" for "National Housing Administrator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Works Administrator relating to defense housing consolidated with other agencies into National Housing Agency during World War II by Ex. Ord. No. 9070.