alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.15 Office of International Affairs. ( a ) The Office of International Affairs (“OIA”) is responsible for the negotiation and implementation of the Commission's bilateral and multilateral agreements and understandings with foreign financial regulatory authorities. OIA coordinates and participates in activities relating to the Commission's international cooperation programs and develops initiatives to enhance the Commission's ability to enforce the federal securities laws in matters with international elements.
( b ) OIA assists in and facilitates the efforts of the Commission's other divisions and offices in responding to international issues and in developing legislative, rulemaking and other initiatives relating to international securities markets. OIA facilitates the development of and, where appropriate, provides advice and presents Commission positions relating to international initiatives of other U.S. Government departments and agencies affecting regulation of securities markets. OIA plans, coordinates and participates in Commission meetings with foreign financial regulatory authorities.
[58 FR 52418, Oct. 8, 1993]
NO. 07-00-0356-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	APRIL 16, 2002

	______________________________

	PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, INC., APPELLANT

	V.

	SHABANA ENTERPRISES, INC. AND VARSHA HUSSAIN, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 133RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

	NO. 97-44520; HONORABLE LAMAR MCCORKLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	ON AGREED MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL	FOR ENTRY

	OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

	By opinion dated April 2, 2002, this Court dismissed this appeal pursuant to Rules 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(a) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  On April 15, 2002, the parties filed two motions, to wit: an agreed motion to reinstate this appeal for entry of settlement and a joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the settlement.  We withdraw our original opinion and judgment of April 2, 2002, and in lieu thereof, issue the following opinion granting the parties’ motion to reinstate the appeal for entry of a settlement and  joint motion to dismiss.

	By their pending motions, the parties represent that they have reached a settlement in the underlying dispute and as an integral part of the settlement, the parties move jointly to dismiss this appeal.  Thus, we reinstate the appeal in order to enter an order of dismissal.  Having dismissed the appeal at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.   

	Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice

Do not publish.
### §1437bbb. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to demonstrate the effectiveness of authorizing local governments and municipalities, in coordination with the public housing agencies for such jurisdictions—

(1) to receive and combine program allocations of covered housing assistance; and

(2) to design creative approaches for providing and administering Federal housing assistance based on the particular needs of the jurisdictions that—

(A) provide incentives to low-income families with children whose head of the household is employed, seeking employment, or preparing for employment by participating in a job training or educational program, or any program that otherwise assists individuals in obtaining employment and attaining economic self-sufficiency;

(B) reduce costs of Federal housing assistance and achieve greater cost-effectiveness in Federal housing assistance expenditures;

(C) increase the stock of affordable housing and housing choices for low-income families;

(D) increase homeownership among low-income families;

(E) reduce geographic concentration of assisted families;

(F) reduce homelessness through providing permanent housing solutions;

(G) improve program management; and

(H) achieve such other purposes with respect to low-income families, as determined by the participating local governments and municipalities in coordination with the public housing agencies; 1

(Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, title IV, §401, as added Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §561, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2616.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, title IV, §411, as added by Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §561, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2624, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 [Oct. 21, 1998]."

1 So in original. The semicolon probably should be a period.
5328.370 Additional Clauses       (a)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i)         (b)(3) Reference AFI 10-220, Attachment 6.1, para 6.1.3, to determine the Approving authority for designating/appointing primary and alternate Government Flight Representatives (GFR).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5328.3 —INSURANCE
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJune 19, 2019, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) duringthe period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: 
Marc Womack
Title: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: 
/s/ Erik Laney
Name: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
### §12203. Prohibition against retaliation and coercion

#### (a) Retaliation

No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.

#### (b) Interference, coercion, or intimidation

It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.

#### (c) Remedies and procedures

The remedies and procedures available under sections 12117, 12133, and 12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and subchapter III, respectively.

(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, §503, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Davis, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 923]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, John J. Connell, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2010-O-S75 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & [MMUNIZED 

DOCKET OST- / t - ^^f ^ ACTION DATE^ 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunk^ .s subjectAvhere applicable, 

to conditions previously impased. 

. 7 0-''fl 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

>;edure, the 2>da»' pej^din 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

the abovi 

4 November 2010 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W.#12''^ Floor 

Washington DC 20006 
Summary DOCKET: OST-2010-XXXX US DOT ORDER: pending 

Date: 

Filing fee / lATA Acct: 

US/UST involved: 

4 November 2010 

USD 61 / 0000-28 

No 

End of Government Filing Period: 11 November 2010 

Intended effective date: 

Agreement: 

15 November 2010 

Mail Vote 649 

TC3 Within South East Asia 

Special Passenger Amending Resolution 01 Of 

Fares between Chinese Taipei and Viet Nam 

Intended effective Date: 15 November 2010 

(Memo 1411) 

r1 01 Of
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            KMART HOLDING CORPORATION
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Kmart
Holding Corporation for the period ended April 30, 2003, each of the undersigned
officers of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         1. this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 30, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
April 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Kmart Holding Corporation.


         Date:    August 8, 2003




         /s/ Julian C. Day
         -----------------
         Julian C. Day
         Chief Executive Officer

         Date:    August 8, 2003



         /s/ Richard J. Noechel
         ----------------------
         Richard J. Noechel
         Vice President and Controller

         Date:    August 8, 2003


         /s/ James F. Gooch
         ------------------
         James F. Gooch
         Vice President and Treasurer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

AL DEMETRIAN HUGHES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-3717 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 27, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel L. Perry, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Al Demetrian Hughes, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to any future claim for postconvi ction relief.

See Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000).

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
§ 201.1105 Administration of plan. ( a ) *Appointment and removal of administrator.* The Commission or the hearing officer shall have discretion to appoint any person, including a Commission employee, as administrator of a plan of disgorgement or a Fair Fund plan and to delegate to that person responsibility for administering the plan. An administrator may be removed at any time by order of the Commission or hearing officer.
( b ) *Assistance by respondent.* A respondent may be required or permitted to administer or assist in administering a plan of disgorgement subject to such terms and conditions as the Commission or the hearing officer deems appropriate to ensure the proper distribution of the funds.
( c ) *Administrator to post bond.* If the administrator is not a Commission employee, the administrator shall be required to obtain a bond in the manner prescribed in 11 U.S.C. 322, in an amount to be approved by the Commission. The cost of the bond may be paid for as a cost of administration. The Commission may waive posting of a bond for good cause shown.
( d ) *Administrator's fees.* If the administrator is a Commission employee, no fee shall be paid to the administrator for his or her services. If the administrator is not a Commission employee, the administrator may file an application for fees for completed services, and upon approval by the Commission or a hearing officer, may be paid a reasonable fee for those services. Any objections thereto shall be filed within 21 days of service of the application on the parties.
( e ) *Source of funds.* Unless otherwise ordered, fees and other expenses of administering the plan shall be paid first from the interest earned on the funds, and if the interest is not sufficient, then from the corpus.
( f ) *Accountings.* During the first 10 days of each calendar quarter, or as otherwise directed by the Commission or the hearing officer, the administrator shall file an accounting of all monies earned or received and all monies spent in connection with the administration of the plan of disgorgement. A final accounting shall be submitted for approval of the Commission or hearing officer prior to discharge of the administrator and cancellation of the administrator's bond, if any.
( g ) *Amendment.* A plan may be amended upon motion by any party or by the plan administrator or upon the Commission's or the hearing officer's own motion.
### §15387. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15387 was editorially reclassified as section 20987 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
GUARANTEE AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 Summary of Translation of 
  
 Guarantee Agreement Numbered 2005 Wangbaozhi No. 002 
  
 On February 6, 2005, with an aim to guarantee our liabilities under the Loan Agreement made between Beijing Haidian District Yuyutan Rural Credit
Cooperation (the “Lender”) and us, Beijing Hejia Software Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Guarantor”) entered into a Guarantee Agreement with the Lender, in which the Guarantor will undertake joint and several liability to guarantee
to our liability to the Lender. The scope of guarantee includes the amount of the loan of RMB 2,800,000, interest, over-due interest, compound interest, compensation, damage, cost to realize the creditor’s rights (which include, without
limitation, litigation costs, lawyers’ fees and traveling expenses) and other accrued costs. The guarantee period shall commence on the effective date of this Guarantee Agreement and end two years after the expiration of the time period for us
to refund the loan, as provided in the Loan Agreement; in case the Loan Agreement is extended, the Guarantor shall continue undertaking the guarantee responsibilities and the guarantee period shall be extended to the date two years after the date
when the extended loan expires. As a fee for its willingness to provide this guarantee, we agree to lend the Guarantor an aggregate of RMB 800,000. Such loan shall be repaid upon the expiration of the guarantee and shall accrue interest at the rate
of 5.58% per annum.
§ 141.8 Procedures for salary offset. ( a ) Deductions to liquidate an employee's debt will be by the method and in the amount stated in the Commission's notice of intention to offset as provided in § 141.4. Debts will be collected in one lump sum where possible. If the employee is financially unable to pay in one lump sum, collection must be made in installments.
( b ) Debts will be collected by deduction at officially established pay intervals from an employee's current pay account unless alternative arrangements for repayment are made.
( c ) Installment deductions will be made over a period not greater than the anticipated period of employment. The size of installment deductions must bear a reasonable relationship to the size of the debt and the employee's ability to pay. The deduction for the pay intervals for any period must not exceed 15% of disposable pay unless the employee has agreed in writing to a deduction of a greater amount.
( d ) Unliquidated debts may be offset against any financial payment due to a separated employee including but not limited to final salary or leave payments in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3716.
### §1592o. Powers of Surgeon General of Public Health Service

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, all functions, powers, and duties under this subchapter and section 1591b of this title with respect to health, refuse disposal, sewage treatment, and water purification shall be exercised by and vested in the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service: Provided, That the Surgeon General shall have power to delegate to any other Federal agency functions, powers, and duties with respect to construction.

(Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, title III, §316, 65 Stat. 310.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Surgeon General abolished by section 3 of 1966 Reorg. Plan No. 3 eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, and functions thereof transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 1 of 1966 Reorg. Plan. No. 3, set out as a note under section 202 of this title. Office of Surgeon General reestablished within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, see Notice of Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Mar. 30, 1987, 52 F.R. 11754.
#### § 201.53 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 201.55.
### §15873. Deposit and use of geothermal lease revenues for 5 fiscal years

#### (a) Deposit of geothermal resources leases

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts received by the United States in the first 5 fiscal years beginning after August 8, 2005, as rentals, royalties, and other payments required under leases under the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 [30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.], excluding funds required to be paid to State and county governments, shall be deposited into a separate account in the Treasury.

#### (b) Use of deposits

Amounts deposited under subsection (a) shall be available to the Secretary of the Interior for expenditure, without further appropriation and without fiscal year limitation, to implement the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 [30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.] and this Act.

#### (c) Transfer of funds

For the purposes of coordination and processing of geothermal leases and geothermal use authorizations on Federal land the Secretary of the Interior may authorize the expenditure or transfer of such funds as are necessary to the Forest Service.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §234, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Geothermal Steam Act of 1970, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is Pub. L. 91–581, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1566, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§1001 et seq.) of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 30 and Tables.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 594, known as the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15801 of this title and Tables.
#### William A. Rock, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 31962.)

— Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing a claim for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of negligent highway maintenance.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3942 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 84. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Direct Red 84. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIRECT RED 84. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Direct Red 84, (2- 

Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 

5,5′-[carbonyl bis(imino-4,1- 

phenylene-2,1- 

diazenediyl)]bis[8-[2-(4- 

sulfophenyl) diazenyl]-, sodium salt (1:4)) (CAS No. 

6409–83–2) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.14.50) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3942 IH

1 (b) EFFECTUVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 17

- 00671

- CV
Rosalinda PEREZ and Stephanie Becerra, Appellants

v. ROSEMONT AT BETHEL PLACE , Appellee
From the County Court a t Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CV

- 05218 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2018
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION In this appeal of an evictio n judgment, Appellants’ brief was due on January 11, 2018. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On January 24, 2018 , after no brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed, we ordered Appellants to show cause in writing not later than Februar y 5, 2018 , why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a). W e warned Appellants that if they failed to show cause in writing as ordered, we could dismiss this appeal
without further notice.04

- 17

- 00671

- CV

- 2

- To date, Appellants have filed no response to our January 24, 2018 order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM