alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Printing Date 2013-08-05 13:51:07 CEST 

Restriction of specific regulatory purposes 

EU: REACH 

Owner 2-Butenedioic acid (E)-, di-C8-18-alkyl esters, CAS 68610-90-2 / 

 

Legal entity 

owner 

 

Endpoint study record: Data waiving Seite 1 von 2

05.08.2013

This document is directed to USEPA pursuant the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). This document is the 

property of the sponsor and may be used only for that purpose intended by the sponsor and as authorized under 

applicable law. Every other or additional use, exploitation, reproduction, publication or submission to other 

parties requires the written permission of the sponsor, except as otherwise required by applicable law (e.g., 

TSCA). The use of these studies/documents for regulatory, registration or other commercial purposes [including 

but not limited to Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical Substances (REACH)], 

without the express written permission of the sponsor is unauthorized and strictly prohibited.
Endpoint study record: Data waiving 

Administrative Data 

UUID IUC5-35357f59-ebb9-464e-af75-f3fb09cb82b8

Dossier UUID 0 

Author 

Date 2011-12-14 16:57:11 CET 

Remarks 

EU: REACH 

Data waiving other justification 

Justification for 

data waiving 

In accordance with column 2 of EC 1907/2006 Annex VII the boiling point measurement does 

not need to be performed as the substance decomposes before boiling. 

Boiling point is a property which shows a correlation with increasing molecular weight / chain 

length and increasing boiling point. Measured boiling points of fatty acids short chain methyl 

ester SCAE ME prove this correlation, so the highest measured boiling point for C16 ME (MW 

= 270,4558) is 338°C, for C18 ME (MW = 298,5095) is 352 °C. 

Blake et al. (J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1961, 6, 87-98) showed for esters of long chain acids that all 

esters with β-hydrogen atoms in the alcohol (i.e. alcohols with C3, e.g. propanol) decompose in 

the range between 262 and 283 °C. 

Conclusion: Esters of fatty acids esterified with alcohols ≥ C3 and having a molecular weight 

exceeding 300 amu have a boiling point > 300 °C, and decompose before boiling. The 

molecular weight of each constituent of the substance exceeds 300 amu (with C8 at least - 341 

amu). 

Endpoint study record: Data waiving Seite 2 von 2

05.08.2013
#### § 170.9 General standard.

An applicant seeking registration as a futures association by the Commission must demonstrate the association's ability to comply with standards and requirements set forth in this part. The applicant must also demonstrate its ability to satisfy the provisions of section 17 of the Act as well as other applicable legal considerations, including that the association will promote fair and open competition among its members and will conduct its affairs consistent with the public interest to be protected by the antitrust laws. The Commission shall not register an applicant association unless the Commission finds that the applicant has satisfied the conditions and requirements of section 17 of the Act and of this part and that registration will be in the public interest.
511.603 Procedures. 		    (a) A DPAS rating may be placed against an entire contract at time of award or an individual order issued under an existing, otherwise unrated, contract. FAR 11.604 requires contracting officers to insert the provision at 52.211-14, Notice of Priority Rating for National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, and Energy Program Use, in solicitations when the contract or order to be awarded will be a rated order and to insert the clause at 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirements, in contracts that are rated orders. 				         				         					          (b) In addition to the FAR provision and clause referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, the contract or order must include the following (see 15 CFR 700.12): 					           						             							              (1)  The appropriate priority rating symbol (i.e., either “DO” or “DX”) along with the program identification symbol. When GSA contracting officers place DO rated orders, they must use program identification symbol “K1”. When placing a DX-rated order for other agencies, GSA contracting officers must use the requesting agency program identification symbol from the DoD Master Urgency List and may only do so when GSA is acting as the procuring agent for DoD or DoE and has received a “DX” rated contract or order from either department. 						             						             							              (2)  A required delivery date. The words “as soon as possible” or “immediately” do not constitute a required delivery date. Use of either a specific date or a specified number of days ARO (after receipt of order) is acceptable. 						             						             							              (3)  The written signature on a manually placed order, or the digital signature or name on an electronically placed order of an individual authorized to place rated orders. 						             						             							              (4) A statement that reads substantially as follows: “This is a rated order certified for national defense use, and you are required to follow all the provisions of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR 700)”. 						             					           				         				         					          (c)  Multiple and Single Award Schedule contracts are not rated at time of award. 	  **Parent topic:** Subpart 511.6 - Priorities and Allocations
### §19112. Entrepreneurial fellowships

#### (a) In general

The Director, acting through the Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships, shall award fellowships to scientists and engineers to help develop leaders capable of maturing promising ideas and technologies from lab to market or other use and forge connections between academic research and the government, industry, financial sectors, and other end users.

#### (b) Application

An applicant for a fellowship under this section shall submit to the Director an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Director may require. At a minimum, the Director shall require that applicants—

(1) have completed a doctoral degree in a STEM field no more than 5 years prior to the date of the application, or have otherwise demonstrated significant postbaccalaureate scientific research experience and are considered early career, according to requirements established by the Director; and

(2) have included in the application a proposal for how the fellow will be embedded in a host institution's research environment.

#### (c) Outreach

The Director shall conduct program outreach to recruit fellowship applicants—

(1) from diverse research institutions;

(2) from all regions of the country; and

(3) from groups historically underrepresented in STEM fields.

#### (d) Administration agreements

The Director may enter into an agreement with a qualified third-party entity to administer the fellowships, subject to the provisions of this section.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director a total of $125,000,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2027, to carry out the activities outlined in this section.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10392, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1588.)
#### Pierre R. Becker et al., Respondents, v. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., Appellant.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 778.]
# Eiropas Savienības L 199/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0715 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 199 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Tiesību akti | 61. gadagājums2018. gada 7. augusts |

ISSN 1977-0715

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 199

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Tiesību akti

61. gadagājums2018. gada 7. augusts

---

| Saturs | | II   Neleģislatīvi akti | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI |
| | * | Informācija par to, ka stājas spēkā Nolīgums starp Eiropas Savienību un Norvēģijas Karalisti par administratīvo sadarbību, krāpšanas apkarošanu un prasījumu piedziņu pievienotās vērtības nodokļa jomā | 1 |

Saturs

II   Neleģislatīvi akti

Lappuse

STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI

*

Informācija par to, ka stājas spēkā Nolīgums starp Eiropas Savienību un Norvēģijas Karalisti par administratīvo sadarbību, krāpšanas apkarošanu un prasījumu piedziņu pievienotās vērtības nodokļa jomā

1

| LV | Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.
  Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte. |
| --- | --- |

LV

Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.

Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte.

---

II Neleģislatīvi akti

STARPTAUTISKI NOLĪGUMI

| 7.8.2018 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2018

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 199/1

---

Informācija par to, ka stājas spēkā Nolīgums starp Eiropas Savienību un Norvēģijas Karalisti par administratīvo sadarbību, krāpšanas apkarošanu un prasījumu piedziņu pievienotās vērtības nodokļa jomā

Pēc nolīguma parakstīšanas 2018. gada 6. februārī Eiropas Savienība un Norvēģijas Karaliste viena otru informēja (attiecīgi 2018. gada 9. jūlijā un 2018. gada 26. jūnijā) par to, ka ir pabeigtas nolīguma 44. panta 1. punktā minētās iekšējās juridiskās procedūras (1).

1

Ievērojot nolīguma 44. panta 2. punktu, tas stājas spēkā 2018. gada 1. septembrī.

---

(1)  Nolīgums starp Eiropas Savienību un Norvēģijas Karalisti par administratīvo sadarbību, krāpšanas apkarošanu un prasījumu piedziņu pievienotās vērtības nodokļa jomā (OV L 195, 1.8.2018., 3. lpp.).

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chandler Shaw, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7262
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHNNY SWANSON, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-95-432) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Swanson, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Frank Eisinger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Johnny Swanson, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motions challenging his conviction and sentence. Because Swanson’s motions amounted to successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motions for which Swanson failed to obtain authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) from this court to file, the district court was without jurisdiction to grant Swanson relief. Accordingly, we affirm. Swanson’s Motion for Default is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §19082. Reviews

The Director shall periodically carry out reviews within each of the directorates and divisions to assess the cost and benefits of extending the operations of research facilities that have exceeded their planned operational lifespan.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10372, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1571.)
### §15461. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15461 was editorially reclassified as section 21061 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### §19038. Plan with respect to controlled information and background screening

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after August 9, 2022, the Director, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and, as appropriate, other Federal agencies, shall develop a plan to—

(1) identify research areas supported by the Foundation, including in the key technology focus areas, that may involve access to controlled unclassified or classified information, including in the key technology focus areas; and

(2) exercise due diligence in granting access, as appropriate, to the CUI or classified information identified under paragraph (1) to individuals working on such research who are employees of the Foundation or covered individuals on research and development awards funded by the Foundation.

#### (b) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Classified information

The term "classified information" means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 13526, any predecessor or successor order, or sections 1-274, 275-321, and 1001-3115 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011-2021, 2022-2286i, 2296a-2297h-13) 1 to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and that is so designated.

#### (2) Controlled unclassified information

The term "controlled unclassified information" or "CUI" means information described as "Controlled Unclassified Information" under Executive Order 13556 or any successor order, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and that is so designated.

(Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title III, §10339, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1554.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 13526, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is set out as a note under section 3161 of Title 50, War and National Defense.

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§2011 et seq.) of this title. Some of the Code sections referred to in subsec. (b)(1) are not part of the Act, and some of the Code sections that are part of the Act have been repealed. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

Executive Order 13556, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is set out as a note under section 3501 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

1 See References in Text note below.
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M150218A 

February 18, 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke Poole, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M., 

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2015, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)1

I. SECY-14-0068 – Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating 

Units 2 and 3) – Petitions for Review of LBP-13-13 and Associated Board Decision on 

Contention NYS-12C

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to petitions for review by the 

State of New York of LBP-13-13 and a related Board decision associated with Contention 

NYS-12C. The Memorandum and Order grants New York’s petitions for review on Contention 

NYS-12C, poses questions to the parties, and sets a briefing schedule. 

(Subsequently, on February 18, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

II. SECY-14-0069 – Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating 

Units 2 and 3) – Petitions for Review of LBP-11-17 and LBP-10-13 on Contention NYS35/36 

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order responding to petitions for review by 

Entergy Nuclear Operations and the NRC staff of LBP-11-17 and LBP-10-13, associated with 

Contention NYS-35/36. The Memorandum and Order grants Entergy’s and the NRC staff’s 

petitions for review to the extent that they raise challenges to the Board’s decisions on 

Contention NYS-35/36, requests additional briefing, and sets a briefing schedule. 

(Subsequently, on February 18, 2015, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

 

 1 Chairman Burns did not participate in these matters. 
cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### 11/09/201 0 11:5 6 202267507 5 OFFIC E O F RULEMAKIN G PAG E 1 6 

# r^EPARTMEN TO F •RANSPORTATION j^t^^^jT'T... . • ' ':K£ TOPERATION S 1661 6 Sant a Yna z St . Fountai n Valley , CA92708625 4 

# ocot.ra7,2o,o , mm- ^

P 1M b Admrnistrato rJ . Randolp h Babbitt Roo m 101 0 Re : Suppor

t thes e change s t o th e FAA' s Fligh tTime/Dut yTim e NPH M Dea rAdministrato rBabDitt : As a U S commercia l pilo t reviewing th e FA ANotic e ofPropoae d Rulemakin g (NPftM ) o n Fll^ m crei ymembe rDut yan d Res t Requlrarrent s I a m please d tha t th e mt^rlt yofth e NPR M represent s a n improvemen t l o curren t regulation s an d cower s al l commerda l operation s i n th e spiri t o f"On e Leve l o fSafety, " However , ther e ar e 90TT M specifi cItem s tha t nee d l o b e chanse d i n orde rt o mitigat e fatigu e fo rth e professiona l pilot . 1 ) Th e flighttim e limi tshoul d no t b e increase d 25 % fro m B hour s t o 1 0 hours . 2 } Th e augmente d ( 3 parson ) fligh ttim e limi tshoul d no t b e inereaee d 25 % fro m 1 2 t o 1 5 hours , 3 ) Ree l requirement s shoul d b e 1 0 hours domesti can d 1 4 hours intemaitonal . 9 hours , reducibl e t o S hour s i s no t enoug h tim e t o achiev e restoratlx/e sleep , eat , an d atten d t o persona l hygien e betvvee n dut yperiods . 4 ) Domesti caugmentatio n shoul d no tb e allowed . A s a professiona l commercia l aviato rworkin g a thig h spee d i n congeste d airspaoe , an d tnrougi h arduou s weathe rconditions . I ca n tel l yo u tha t fatigu e mitigatio n i s paramoun t t o Improvin g th e safet yofth e travellin g public . Th e NTS B ha s hel d fatigu e o n it s "Mos t Wante d Ust * to rthirt yyear s becaus e i t i s a proble m ttia t fligh t crevy s dea l witt i a n a dail ybasis , Thi s FA ANPR M wil l g o a lon g wa yt o reducin g fatigu e an d Increasin g safet yI fthes e Item s ar e addressed . Sincerely ,

Scot tBiederman n
### §17356. General personnel authorities

#### (a) Detail of personnel

Upon request of the Chief Executive Officer, the head of an agency may detail any employee of such agency to the Foundation on a reimbursable basis. Any employee so detailed remains, for the purpose of preserving such employee's allowances, privileges, rights, seniority, and other benefits, an employee of the agency from which detailed.

#### (b) Reemployment rights

#### (1) In general

An employee of an agency who is serving under a career or career conditional appointment (or the equivalent), and who, with the consent of the head of such agency, transfers to the Foundation, is entitled to be reemployed in such employee's former position or a position of like seniority, status, and pay in such agency, if such employee—

(A) is separated from the Foundation for any reason, other than misconduct, neglect of duty, or malfeasance; and

(B) applies for reemployment not later than 90 days after the date of separation from the Foundation.

#### (2) Specific rights

An employee who satisfies paragraph (1) is entitled to be reemployed (in accordance with such paragraph) within 30 days after applying for reemployment and, on reemployment, is entitled to at least the rate of basic pay to which such employee would have been entitled had such employee never transferred.

#### (c) Hiring authority

Of persons employed by the Foundation, no more than 30 persons may be appointed, compensated, or removed without regard to the civil service laws and regulations.

#### (d) Basic pay

The Chief Executive Officer may fix the rate of basic pay of employees of the Foundation without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 of title 5 (relating to the classification of positions), subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title (relating to General Schedule pay rates), except that no employee of the Foundation may receive a rate of basic pay that exceeds the rate for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of such title.

#### (e) Definitions

In this section—

(1) the term "agency" means an executive agency, as defined by section 105 of title 5; and

(2) the term "detail" means the assignment or loan of an employee, without a change of position, from the agency by which such employee is employed to the Foundation.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title IX, §926, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1737.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
**CHARLES
      V. RICHARDSON**


**6709
      La Tijera Blvd., Suite 399**


**Los
      Angeles, CA 90045**







August
      13, 2007




Mr.
      Philip M. Cohen, Chairman


Medical
      Media Television, Inc.


8406
      Benjamin Road, Suite C


Tampa,
      FL
      33634





Dear
      Phil:





Please
      consider this letter my resignation as a member of the Board of Directors of
      Medical Media Television, Inc. effective this date. My resignation was not
      the
      result of a disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the
      Company’s operations, policies, or practices.





Sincerely,




/s/
                Charles V. RichardsonCharles
                V. Richardson
### §15306. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15306 was editorially reclassified as section 20906 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# muiteb**~tate~** 

# (!Courtof**~peaI~** 

# fortbejf 

# eberaI (!Circuit

MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WILLIAM H. GATES, III, AND STEVEN A. BALLMER, Defendants-Appellees. 2012-1357 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no.11-CV-3505, Judge Charles R. Breyer. ON MOTION

ORDER Martin Reiffin moves without opposition for leave to file a corrected reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, Case: 12-1357 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 10/31/2012MARTIN REIFFIN V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT lsIJan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s27 2 Case: 12-1357 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 10/31/2012
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3997 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

expensing of environmental remediation costs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mr. BARROW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for expensing of environmental remediation 

costs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPENSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDI4 ATION COSTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 198 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to termi7 nation) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3997 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to expenditures paid or incurred 

3 after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 204.41 Non-waiver of rights.

An employee's involuntary payment of all or any portion of a debt being collected under 5 U.S.C. 5514 shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights that the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law, unless there are statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary.