alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Este folleto se puede obtener en otros formatos

para los impedidos.

El EEOC autoriza la reproducción de sus MEDIACI

publicaciones.

Ó N MEDIACI Ó N

¿Cómo puedo obtener más

información?

Si desea más información, visite nuestra página en el web

www.eeoc.gov o llame a estos números:

1-800-669-4000 (audio)

or

1-800-669-6820 (teletipo

para los que tengan un 

impedimento auditivo)

¿Qué es la mediación?

La mediación es un proceso JUSTO y

EFICIENTE que le ayuda a resolver sus

disputas sobre discrimen en el empleo y

llegar a un acuerdo mutuo.

Un mediador neutral le ayuda a negociar

un acuerdo voluntario.

¿Cómo funciona el EEOC?

La decisión de participar en mediación es voluntaria, tanto

para el/la querellante como para el patrono.

Cuando se radica una querella formal, se le ofrece

mediación a ambas partes.

Si tanto el/la querellante como el patrono están de acuerdo,

un mediador con experiencia fijará la fecha para la

mediación.

Durante la mediación, ambas partes podrán intercambiar

información y expresar lo que desean para llegar a una

resolución.

Ambas partes dialogan para alcanzar un acuerdo y resolver

sus diferencias. El acuerdo al que lleguen en la mediación

es tan vinculante como cualquier arreglo concertado por

medio de el EEOC.

Si no se llega a un acuerdo, el caso será remitido al proceso

de investigación del EEOC para que se tramite como

cualquier otro caso.

La información presentada durante la mediación es

confidencial, y no se revelará a nadie, ni siquiera a otros

empleados de el EEOC.

Elija la mediación

para resolver las

controversias de

discrimen en el

empleo.

¿Por qué laborar por meses en la investigación y/o

el litigio?

Mediación ...

ES JUSTA Y NEUTRAL

Ambas partes tienen los mismos derechos durante el

proceso. Son las partes interesadas, y no el mediador,

quienes deciden cuáles serán las condiciones del acuerdo.

No hay determinación de culpabilidad o de inocencia durante

este proceso.

SE AHORRA TIEMPO Y DINERO

Muchos acuerdos se logran por medio de la mediación en

una sola reunión. En todos los casos la representación legal

o de otra índole es permitida, auque no es un requisito.

ES CONFIDENCIAL

Todas las partes firman un acuerdo de confidencialidad

cuando se inicia el proceso.

SE EVITA EL LITIGIO

INNECESARIO

Se PUEDE evitar un litigio prolongado.

La mediación

fomenta un mejor

ambiente de trabajo,

reduce los costos y

beneficia al patrono

Y al empleado.
MEDIACION-! MEDIACIÓN!

MEDIACIÓN! MEDIACIÓN!

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Chairwoman Ida L. Castro

Justa,

Eficiente y

Todos Salen

Ganando

Cargos por Discrimen en el Empleo

MEDIACIÓN!

Justa,

Eficiente y

Todos Salen

Ganando

on el proceso y

entes estarían de

 El resultado fué

podría haberse

ocedimiento

 y

o casos de

el (EEOC). Creo

y eficiente,

n empleado sigue

andado."

bility Law

ones en las

EOC) y los

ocales es del 70

egociaciones, y

mer día de la etapa

ace y se concentra

nt Food, Inc.

ones del EEOC, o

s, visite nuestra

.eeoc.gov o

pportunity

Center

549

Washington, D.C. 20507
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.60 Qualification to participate in particular matters.

The question in a particular matter rests with that individual member. Each member should weigh carefully the question of his qualification with respect to any matter wherein he or any relatives or former business associates or clients are involved. He should disqualify himself in the event he obtained knowledge prior to becoming a member of the facts at issue before him in a quasi-judicial proceeding, or in other types of proceeding in any matter involving parties in whom he has any interest or relationship directly or indirectly. If an interested person suggests that a member should disqualify himself in a particular matter because of bias or prejudice, the member shall be the judge of his own qualification.
§ 1702.3 Substantive requirements. ( a ) A petition filed under this part shall include the information required by this part, or a satisfactory explanation for the absence of the information. As provided by § 1702.4, a petition which is not complete may be closed. To be considered complete, a petition shall include the following: ( 1 ) A statement of the justification for the exemption in accordance with § 1702.7,
( 2 ) All reasonably available human experience data, reasonably available relevant experimental data (both human and animal), product and packaging specifications, labeling, and marketing history, in accordance with §§ 1702.8 through 1702.14,
( b ) As used in this regulation, “reasonably available” information is data in the petitioner's possession; data that has previously been generated by the petitioner, and data that is obtainable from such sources as: Reports from Poison Control Centers; reports of adverse reactions that have been submitted to the petitioner; the medical, pharmacological, and toxicological literature; and information required by the FDA for an Investigational Exemption for a New Drug (IND) or a New Drug Application (NDA).
..¶-rORWLY SmwsKYAI. 

August 29. 1972 

Honorable Robert Buntyn Opinion No. M-1197 

County Attorney 

Castro County Courthouse R8: Whether the Commiseioners 

Dimmitt, Texas 79027 Court of Castro County may 

set the salaries of Justices 

of the Peace at an hourly 

rate for hours actually 

Dear Mr. Buntyn: worked. 

You have requested an opinion as to whether the Commissioners Court of Castro County may set the salaries of Justices 

of the Peace at an'hourly rata for hours actually worked. 

The commissioners court is a court of limited jurisdiction and,i+ias only such powers as ere conferred upon it by the 

statutes 'and Constitution of this State, whether by express terms 

or by necessary ~mpliqa~ion. Section 18, Article V, Constitution 

of Texas: Article 2351, Vernon's Civil Statutes; and Attorney 

General's Opinion C-350 (1965), and numerous case authorities 

there cited. 

Under~ the provisions of Section 61 of Article XVI of 

the Constitution o’f Texas , the comniissioners court has the authodty to determine whether justices of the peace are to be 

compensated on a'fee.basie or a salary basis. Attorney General's 

Opp;;ms C-497 (1965), V-748 (1948), WW-1499 (1962) .and V-750 

. Article 53.07,, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, requiring 

every justice of the peace to be compensated on a salary basis 

hes bean held to.'b+ unconstitutional and in violation of Article 

XVI, Section 61, Texas Constitution. Attorney General’s Opinion 

C-497, supra. 

We know of no provision in the Constitution or 'statutes 

of this State authorizing the commissioners court to compensate 

justices of the peace on an hourly basis. 

The commissioners court may not interfere or usurp the 

sphere that is delegated to a county official by law. Pritchard 

& Abbott vi McKenna, 350 S.W.Zd 335 (Tex.Sup. 1961). Therefore, 

the commissioners court is not authorized to prescribe office hours 

-5842- 
. 

Hon. Robert Buntyn, page 2 (M-1197) 

of a county or precinct official or the days which such official 

would be required to keep his office open. Attorney General's 

Opinions O-6679 (1945) and C-350 (1964). 

Since the commissioners court does not have the authority to prescribe office hours of justices of the peace and 

the method of compensation is prescribed by the Constitution as 

either a fee basis or a salary basis, you are advised that the 

commissioners court does not have the authority to compensate 

justices of the peace on an hourly basis. 

SUMMARY 

A commissioners court does not 

to compensate justices of the peace 

basis. 

have authority 

on an hourly 

Ve 94 truly yours, 

c. Mh .~~ 

ey General of Texas 

Prepared by John Reeves 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

Sam Jones 

Gordon Cass 

John Banks 

Bob Lattimore 

SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

-5843-
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.205 Effect upon existing Commission organization, delegations, and rules.

Except as otherwise provided herein, all outstanding Commission organizational statements, delegations of authority, orders, rules and regulations shall remain in force and effect during emergency conditions, subject to all lawful requirements and such changes as may be authorized by or in the name of the Chairman or the Commission.

[28 FR 6970, July 9, 1963, as amended at 71 FR 33387, June 9, 2006]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Cole,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/Robert L. Cole                                    November 12, 2003
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Robert L. Cole                                       Date
Chief Executive Officer




                                       22
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of T. D.L ., a child, * From the 266 th District Court

of Erath County,

Trial Court No. C V 36775

.

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 005

- C V * June 29 , 202 3

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we

reverse the order of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial court for

further proceedings consistent with this opinion

. The costs incurred by reason of

this appeal are taxed against Kourtney Voight

.
Subpart 3422.10—Service Contract Labor

Standards

Parent topic: PART 3422—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

3422.1002 Statutory and Executive order requirements.

3422.1002-1 General.

Consistent with 29 CFR 4.145, the five-year limitation set forth in the Service Contract Act of 1965,

as amended (Service Contact Act), applies to each period of the contract individually, not the

cumulative period of base and option periods. Accordingly, no contract subject to the Service

Contract Act issued by the Department of Education will have a base period or option period that

exceeds five years.
HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56762 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56763 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56764 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56765 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56766 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56767 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56768 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56769 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56770 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56771 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56772 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56773 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56774 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56775 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56776 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56777 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56778 1992HeinOnline -- 57 Fed. Reg. 56779 1992
#### § 170.17 Introducing brokers, commodity pool operators, and commodity trading advisors.

Each person registered as an introducing broker, commodity pool operator, or commodity trading advisor must become and remain a member of at least one futures association that is registered under Section 17 of the Act and that provides for the membership therein of introducing brokers, commodity pool operators, or commodity trading advisors, as the case may be, unless no such futures association is so registered; provided, however that a person registered as a commodity trading advisor shall not be required to become or remain a member of such a futures association, solely in respect of its registration as a commodity trading advisor, if such person is eligible for the exemption from registration as such pursuant to § 4.14(a)(9) of this chapter.

[80 FR 55029, Sept. 14, 2015]
### §12743. Development of model programs

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall—

(1) in cooperation with participating jurisdictions, government-sponsored mortgage finance corporations, nonprofit organizations, the private sector, and other appropriate parties, develop, test, evaluate, refine, and, as necessary, replace a selection of model programs designed to carry out the purposes of this subchapter;

(2) make available to participating jurisdictions alternative model programs, which shall include suggested guidelines, procedures, forms, legal documents and such other elements as the Secretary determines to be appropriate;

(3) assure, insofar as is feasible, the availability of an appropriate variety of model programs designed for local market conditions, housing problems, project characteristics, and managerial capacities as they differ among participating jurisdictions;

(4) negotiate and enter into agreements with agencies of the Federal Government, participating jurisdictions, private financial institutions, government-sponsored mortgage finance corporations, nonprofit organizations, and other entities to provide such services, products, or financing as may be required for the implementation of a model program;

(5) provide detailed information on model programs as requested by participating jurisdictions, private financial institutions, developers, nonprofit organizations, and other interested parties; and

(6) encourage the use of such model programs to achieve efficiency, economies of scale, and effectiveness in the investment of funds made available under this part through third-party training, printed materials, and such other means of support as the Secretary determines will achieve the purpose of this subchapter.

#### (b) Adoption of programs

Except as provided in section 12753(2) of this title, each participating jurisdiction shall have the discretion to adopt one or more model programs, adapt one or more model programs to its own requirements, design additional forms of assistance by itself or in cooperation with other participating jurisdictions, and suggest additional model programs for adoption by the Secretary as the participating jurisdiction may deem appropriate, and the Secretary may assist a participating jurisdiction in adopting, adapting, or designing one or more model programs.

#### (c) Part D programs

The selection of model programs to be made available for adoption or adaptation shall include programs meeting the criteria set forth in part D.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §213, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4100.)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Final Regulatory Basis- Cyber Security Facilities.

Accession Number: ML15355A461

Date Released: Monday, March 7, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15355A474 - Memo to Pamela Henderson Regarding the Regulatory Basis for a Rulemaking Related to Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities (10 CFR Part 73). (2 page(s), 3/3/2016)
    - ML15355A466 - Enclosure 1 - Regulatory Basis for Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities. (73 page(s), 3/3/2016)
    - ML15355A469 - Enclosure 2 - Comment Resolution Document for Regulatory Basis Regarding Cyber Security and Fuel Cycle Facilities. (70 page(s), 3/3/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Subpart 5327.2 – PATENTS AND

COPYRIGHTS

Parent topic: Part 5327 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights

5327.201-2 Contract Clauses

(e) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
MP5346.103 - Contracting Office Responsibilities       *Revised: June 2023*         The following mandatory procedures will be used when awarding services acquisitions unless the three conditions at DFARS PGI 201.602-2(v)(A) are met.         1. Roles and Responsibilities         a. The COCO/Chiefs of Performance Management Offices must ensure that a:         (1) Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) is appointed and properly trained to integrate the quality contract requirements into the quality assurance program, act as the liaison between the contracting and functional organizations, and provide training and record keeping in accordance with MP5301.602-2(d).         b. The CO must:         (1) Advise the acquisition team on Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan development.         (2) Designate Contracting Officer’s Representatives (COR) in accordance with MP5301.602-2(d)         c. The QAPC must:         (1) Successfully complete the QAPC course conducted by AETC prior to conducting any training.         (2) Support the acquisition team in the development of contract quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring that requirements are clearly stated and enforceable.         (3) Assist the acquisition team during market research efforts in determining commercial quality assurance practices.         (4) Assist, as required, with the evaluation of contractor Quality Control Plans.         (5) Successfully complete the Management of Subcontracting Compliance (CLC 059) course offered by the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) A new requirement for 1102’s and CORs.    **Parent topic:** MP5346.1 - GENERAL
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Shots for safety.**
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:SH 8/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001099540
 
2000 | 2007 | 2011 | 2016 | 2020
 
September 27, 2018
§ 1115.8 Compliance with product safety standards. ( a ) *Voluntary standards.* The CPSA and other federal statutes administered by the Commission generally encourage the private sector development of, and compliance with voluntary consumer product safety standards to help protect the public from unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products. To support the development of such consensus standards, Commission staff participates in many voluntary standards committees and other activities. The Commission also strongly encourages all firms to comply with voluntary consumer product safety standards and considers, where appropriate, compliance or non-compliance with such standards in exercising its authorities under the CPSA and other federal statutes, including when making determinations under section 15 of the CPSA. Thus, for example, whether a product is in compliance with applicable voluntary safety standards may be relevant to the Commission staff's preliminary determination of whether that product presents a substantial product hazard under section 15 of the CPSA.
( b ) *Mandatory standards.* The CPSA requires that firms comply with all applicable mandatory consumer product safety standards and to report to the Commission any products which do not comply with either mandatory standards or voluntary standards upon which the Commission has relied. As is the case with voluntary consumer product safety standards, compliance or non-compliance with applicable mandatory safety standards may be considered by the Commission and staff in making relevant determinations and exercising relevant authorities under the CPSA and other federal statutes. Thus, for example, while compliance with a relevant mandatory product safety standard does not, of itself, relieve a firm from the need to report to the Commission a product defect that creates a substantial product hazard under section 15 of the CPSA, it will be considered by staff in making the determination of whether and what type of corrective action may be required.
[71 FR 42030, July 25, 2006]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgewater Foods International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:  April 13, 2007



/s/  Robert Saunders

Robert Saunders,

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
3, 2005.
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Part 219, Small business Programs, and the clause at 
DRAFS 252.219-7003; OMB Control Number 0704-0386.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 41.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 41.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 41.
    Needs and Uses: DoD uses this information in assessing contractor 
compliance with small business subcontracting plans in accordance with 
10 U.S.C. 2323(h).
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit and not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. 
Toppings, WHS/ESCD/Information Management Division, 1225 South Clark 
Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: November 22, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-26433 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M