alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 15, 2005        



32
Exhibit No. 32

# Certification of
Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Paul M. Bonaiuto, Executive
Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc.,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 24, 2006 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven J. SmithSteven J. Smith, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Paul
M. BonaiutoPaul M. Bonaiuto,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 700.12 Effective date of 16 CFR parts 701 and 702.

The Statement of Basis and Purpose of the final rules promulgated on December 31, 1975, provides that parts 701 and 702 of this chapter will become effective one year after the date of promulgation, December 31, 1976. The Commission intends this to mean that these rules apply only to written warranties on products manufactured after December 31, 1976.
### §16798. Repealed or Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–155, title VI, §619, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2935, which related to implementation of previous recommendations, was repealed in part and omitted in part. Subsec. (b) was repealed and reenacted as section 40909 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs, by Pub. L. 111–314, §§3, 6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3328, 3444, which Act enacted Title 51. Subsec. (a), requiring Administrator's report to Congressional committees regarding implementation of Government Accountability Office Report No. 04–639 not later than 180 days after Dec. 30, 2005, was omitted from the Code following the enactment of Title 51.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER




PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, Lisa
      VanPatten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  January
              14, 2008
            
            /s/
              Lisa VanPattenLisa
              VanPattenChief
              Financial Officer
|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |
| CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION                              |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |

|                              |
|------------------------------|
|                              |  |  |  |  |
| Delaware                     |   | 1-5823 |   | 36-6169860 |
| (State or other jurisdiction |   | (Commission |   | (IRS Employer |
| of incorporation)            |   | File Number) |   | Identification No.) |

|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
| 333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois         |   | 60604 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| NOT APPLICABLE                                                 |
| (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) |

----

|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |
|               | Votes For |   | Votes Withheld |   | Broker Non-Votes |
| Paul J. Liska      | 263,957,702 |   | 591,124 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Jose O. Montemayor | 263,953,716 |   | 595,110 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Thomas F. Motamed  | 255,425,809 |   | 9,123,017 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Don M. Randel      | 263,957,224 |   | 591,602 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Joseph Rosenberg   | 258,242,693 |   | 6,306,133 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Andrew H. Tisch    | 257,857,004 |   | 6,691,822 |   | 1,677,101 |
| James S. Tisch     | 257,860,142 |   | 6,688,684 |   | 1,677,101 |
| Marvin Zonis       | 263,891,669 |   | 657,157 |   | 1,677,101 |

|                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                    | Votes For |   | Votes Against |   | Votes Abstained |   | Broker Non-Votes |
| Advisory vote on executive compensation | 263,902,805 |   | 519,174 |   | 126,847 |   | 1,677,101 |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                     | Votes For |   | Votes Against |   | Votes Abstained |
| Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP | 265,878,986 |   | 221,442 |   | 125,499 |

----

|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |  |
|                            |   | CNA Financial Corporation |
|                            |   | (Registrant) |
|                            |   |   |
| Date:  April 24, 2013 | By | /s/ D. Craig Mense |
|                            |   | (Signature) |
|                            |   | D. Craig MenseExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
:~.B~R~l ~IM ~ / 

A V I A T 1 O N 

June 5, 2015 

SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY T0: Federal Docket Management System, www.regulations.gov 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 

Subject: Second status request regarding petition for exemption under docket FAA-2014-0714 for Brim 

Equipment Leasing, Inc. dba. Brim Aviation 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter is in regard to the petition for exemption submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration on 

September 10, 2014 under docket number FAA-2014-0714. We respectfully request, at your earliest 

convenience, the status of this matter. 

Kind regards. 

rJI.Brim 

President 

fo~N N 

PO Box 3009, Ashland, OR 97520 

Tel: 541-482-1008 • Fax: 866-929-5133 

www.brimaviation.com
#### PIPER v. WADE et ux.

Affidavits for defendant in attachment, traversing affidavits of purpose to remove property from the state with intent to defraud creditors, place the burden on plaintiff to show such intent.

Mere purpose to remove property from the state is not ground for attachment; intent to defraud creditors being essential.

(Opinion filed, October 19, 1911.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County; Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Judge.

Action by J. R. Piper against Charles H. Wade and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Reversed, with directions.

*O. S.*Hagen, for appellants.

*A. W.*Wilmarth, for respondent.

McCOY, J.

A warrant of attachment was issued in this action upon an affidavit of plaintiff stating “that the defendants are about to leave the state of South Dakota, and are about to remove all their property from the state of South Dakota with intent of defrauding their creditors, particularly this plaintiff.” Upon affidavits traversing and denying the said affidavit of plaintiff, defendants moved the court to discharge the said attachment. The defendants each positively denied that they ever intended to remove from the state, or intended to remove their property from the state with intent to defraud their creditors. The effect of these traversing affidavits was to cast upon plaintiff the burden of proving that defendants were about to remove from the state with intent to defraud their creditors. The only proof offered by plaintiff was the affidavit of one Minnie Grant, who by affidavit testified “that during the month of October, 1910, the defendant Eucy *197A. Wade said to this affiant that she was going back to her old home in Illinois, and when she did she would say good-bye to this country, and also said to this affiant that as soon as her husband could finish the work he was doing and get settled up that he was also going back there and leave this country.” The court denied the motion to discharge- such attachment, and defendants appeal, assigning as error the said ruling of the court.

[1, 2] We are of the opinion the attachment proceedings should have been discharged. It is not sufficient to show that defendant, against whose property an attachment is sought, is about to remove from the state. The affidavit of Minnie Grant makes no reference whatever to the removal of defendants’ property from the state. The gist of this ground for attachment is the removal of property from the state *zvith intent to defraud creditors.*There must be some facts or circumstances shown from which such intent may be inferred.. A person might leave the state and take his property with him, and still have no intention of defrauding his creditors. He might leave the state and take his proprety with' him with perfectly honest intentions.

The order appealed from is reversed, and the circuit court directed to discharge said attachment.
EXHIBIT 32

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Yearly Report of Prime  Holdings and  Investments,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  as Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Office of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Visendi
---------------------------------
John Visendi
President, Chief Executive Officer
And Chief Financial Officer
April 19, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 ("Section  906"), or other document  authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Prime Holdings and  Investments,  Inc. and will be retained
by Prime  Holdings and  Investments,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alexander V. Lagerborg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-QSB by ACROSS AMERICA REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP.;

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of ACROSS AMERICA REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for ACROSS AMERICA
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP and have:

     i. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;

     ii. Evaluated the effectiveness of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
CORP.'s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

     iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP. auditors and the
audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

     i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
CORP.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP.'s auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

     ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and

6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or
not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2004

                            /s/ Alexander V. Lagerborg
                            --------------------------
                            Alexander V. Lagerborg, Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
### §17332. United States exports and outreach programs for India, China, and other countries

#### (a) Assistance authorized

The Secretary of Commerce shall direct the United States and Foreign Commercial Service to expand or create a corps of the Foreign Commercial Service officers to promote United States exports in clean and efficient energy technologies and build the capacity of government officials in India, China, and any other country the Secretary of Commerce determines appropriate, to become more familiar with the available technologies—

(1) by assigning or training Foreign Commercial Service attachés, who have expertise in clean and efficient energy technologies from the United States, to embark on business development and outreach efforts to such countries; and

(2) by deploying the attachés described in paragraph (1) to educate provincial, state, and local government officials in such countries on the variety of United States-based technologies in clean and efficient energy technologies for the purposes of promoting United States exports and reducing global greenhouse gas emissions.

#### (b) Report

The Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an annual report on the implementation of this section for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title IX, §912, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1726.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT EVAN WEBSTER,

Appellant,

v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,

Appellee. No. 20

- 35798

D.C. No. 3:20

- cv

- 00875

- MO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14 , 2021 * *

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Brent Evan Webster appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying any relief sought

in his “objections to no evidence hearings on April 30, 2020, ” in his adversary

proceeding against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. We have jurisdiction und er 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 35798

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Webster fails to address how the district court erred by

dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. As a result, Webster has waived his

challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052

(9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief

are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We

will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not

preserve a claim . . . .” ).

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Mano

- Y

& M, Ltd. v. Field (In re Mortg. Store, Inc.) , 773 F.3d 990, 998 (9th Cir. 2014);

Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
### §14097. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14097 was editorially reclassified as section 12557 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DALE FOSTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 550 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §17509. Applicability

(a) Priority in Reducing Headquarters Use.—The heads of executive agencies shall give first priority to meeting the goals established by the President under section 17507(a) of this title by reducing the costs of administrative motor vehicles used at the headquarters and regional headquarters of executive agencies, rather than by reducing the costs of motor vehicles used by line agency personnel working in agency field operations or activities.

(b) Regulations, Standards, and Definitions.—The President shall require the Administrator of General Services, in cooperation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to prescribe appropriate regulations, standards, and definitions to ensure that executive agencies meet the goals established under section 17507(a) of this title in the manner prescribed by subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1285.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17509 | 40:910. | Pub. L. 99–272, title XV, §15310, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 338. |

Section
United States Steel Corporation – Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request - Item 1 - April 24, 2012

U. S. Steel – Keetac Concentrator Flowsheet

NSPC Concentrator Flowsheet

Gyratory 

Crusher

Ore Storage

Sag Mills

Cobber Magnetic

Separators

Cobber Tails

Hydroseparators

Tails

Thickeners

Slurry Tanks

Cyclone

Rougher Magnetic

Separator

Ball Mill

Primary

Screens

Hydroseparators

Finisher Magnetic

Separators

Secondary

Screens

To Tailing Pond

Final Concentrate

To Pellet Plant

Comminution

Separation

Classification

Tails System

Intermediate 

Steps

To Tails

Thickeners

Plant 

Water 

System

Lines 4 & 5 only

Lines 1, 2 & 3 only
1809.507-2 Contract clause.       The contracting officer may insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 1852.209–71, Limitation of Future Contracting, in solicitations and contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1809.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest