alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Michael Luetkemeyer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HiEnergy Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bogdan
C. Maglich, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                          By:  /s/
                                              -------------------------------
                                          Bogdan C. Maglich,
                                          Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                          Treasurer and Chief Scientific Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer)


September  13, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXI—WORLD TRADE CENTER HEALTH PROGRAM
### §13931. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13931 was editorially reclassified as section 12301 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:February 14, 2007              /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Chief Executive Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3869 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2012 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 600 East Capitol Avenue in Little Rock, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Sidney ‘Sid’ Sanders McMath Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

HR 3869 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SIDNEY ‘‘SID’’ SANDERS MCMATH POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 600 East Capitol Avenue in Lit5 tle Rock, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sidney ‘Sid’ Sanders McMath Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sidney ‘Sid’ Sanders 

11 McMath Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
Home  | Search  | Sitemap  | Contact
PUBLIC LAW 115–388—DEC. 21, 2018 132 STAT. 5171 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 7230: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Dec. 11, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–388 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 226 West 

Main Street in Lake City, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Postmaster Frazier B. Baker 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. POSTMASTER FRAZIER B. BAKER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 226 West Main Street in Lake City, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Postmaster Frazier 

B. Baker Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Postmaster Frazier B. Baker Post Office’’. 

Approved December 21, 2018. 

Dec. 21, 2018 

[H.R. 7230] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
#### In the Matter of Henry Wolf, an Attorney.

Disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Bar Association of the City of New York.

Per Curiam:

It appearing that the respondent was admitted to the bar in Hovember, 1913, and was on the 8th day of May, 1916, at a Trial Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the county of Kings, duly convicted upon his plea of guilty of a felony, to wit, attempted grand larceny in the first degree, he is hereby disbarred. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Respondent disbarred. Order to be settled on notice.
#### § 210.12-16 Supplementary insurance information.

[For insurance companies]

| Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | Column F | Column G | Column H | Column I | Column J | Column K |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Segment1 | Deferred policy acquisition cost (caption 7) | Future policy benefits, losses, claims and loss expenses (caption 13-a-1) | Unearned premiums (caption 13-a-2) | Other policy claims and benefits payable (caption 13-a-3) | Premium revenue (caption 1) | Net investment income (caption 2)3 | Benefits, claims, losses, and settlement expenses (caption 5) | Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4 | Other operating expenses3 4 | Premiums written2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total5 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Segments shown should be the same as those presented in the footnote disclosures called for by generally accepted accounting principles. | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 Does not apply to life insurance or title insurance. This amount should include premiums from reinsurance assumed, and be net of premiums on reinsurance ceded. | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 State the basis for allocation of net investment income and, where applicable, other operating expenses. | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 The total of columns I and J should agree with the amount shown for statement of comprehensive income caption 7. | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5 Totals should agree with the indicated balance sheet and statement of comprehensive income caption amounts, where a caption number is shown. | | | | | | | | | | |

[[46 FR 54338](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-54338), Nov. 2, 1981, as amended at [57 FR 45293](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-45293), Oct. 1, 1992; [64 FR 1734](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-1734), Jan. 12, 1999; [83 FR 50208](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/83-FR-50208), Oct. 4, 2018]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3900 

To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL pipeline is used 

to reduce United States dependence on Middle Eastern oil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2012 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL 

pipeline is used to reduce United States dependence on 

Middle Eastern oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY SECURITY. 

4 The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that any crude 

5 oil and bitumen transported by the Keystone XL pipeline, 

6 and all refined petroleum products whose origin was via 

7 importation of crude oil or bitumen by the Keystone XL 

8 pipeline, will be entered into domestic commerce for final 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3900 IH

1 disposition. The President may provide for waivers of such 

2 requirement in the following situations: 

3 (1) Where the President determines that such 

4 a waiver is in the national interest because it— 

5 (A) will not lead to an increase in domestic 

6 consumption of crude oil or refined petroleum 

7 products obtained from countries hostile to 

8 United States interests or with political and 

9 economic instability that compromises energy 

10 supply security; 

11 (B) will not lead to higher costs to refiners 

12 who purchase the crude oil than such refiners 

13 would have to pay for crude oil in the absence 

14 of such a waiver; and 

15 (C) will not lead to higher gasoline costs to 

16 consumers than consumers would have to pay 

17 in the absence of such a waiver. 

18 (2) Where an exchange of crude oil or refined 

19 product provides for no net loss of crude oil or re20 fined product consumed domestically. 

21 (3) Where a waiver is necessary under the Con22 stitution, a law, or an international agreement. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138626

MARY CIPRIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138626 COA: 289393 Macomb CC: 91-004641-DO SALVATORE CIPRIANO, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 8, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.22 The Chief Accountant.

The Chief Accountant of the Commission is the principal adviser to the Commission on, and is responsible to the Commission for, all accounting and auditing matters arising in the administration of the federal securities laws. The Chief Accountant oversees the accounting profession's standard-setting and self-regulatory organizations, develops or supervises the development of accounting and auditing rules, regulations, opinions and policy, and interprets Commission accounting policy and positions. The Chief Accountant is responsible for recommending the institution of administrative and disciplinary proceedings relating to the disqualification of accountants to practice before the Commission. The Chief Accountant supervises the procedures to be followed in the Commission's enforcement activities involving accounting and auditing issues and helps resolve differences on accounting issues between registrants and the Commission staff.

[60 FR 14626, Mar. 20, 1995]
#### Robert E. Mattice, Respondent, v. Fred L’Amereaux, Appellant.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.
§ 204.5 Debtor's failure to respond. If the debtor fails to respond to the notice described in § 204.4(a) by the proposed effective date specified in the notice, the Commission may take further action under this section or under the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR 901.3). The commission may collect by administrative offset if the debtor: ( a ) Has not made payment by the payment due date;
( b ) Has not requested a review of the claim within the agency as set out in § 204.6; or
( c ) Has not made an arrangement for payment by the payment due date.
[58 FR 64370, Dec. 7, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54130, Oct. 26, 2001]
#### Catherine Smith et al., Respondents, v. Gersei Realty Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §14135e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14135e was editorially reclassified as section 40706 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 3.71 Authority.

Except while pending in a U.S. court of appeals on a petition for review (after the transcript of the record has been filed) or in the U.S. Supreme Court, a proceeding may be reopened by the Commission at any time in accordance with § 3.72. Any person subject to a Commission decision containing a rule or order which has become effective, or an order to cease and desist which has become final may file a request to reopen the proceeding in accordance with § 2.51.

[44 FR 40637, July 12, 1979]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7419

THOMAS E. MAREE-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN NASH, Warden, FCI Schuylkill, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA02-2584-CCB) Submitted: November 20, 2002 Decided: December 16, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Maree-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Maree-Bey suggests in his informal brief to this court that he is unable to complete administrative exhaustion of his claim because he has been paroled from custody. However, the applicable regulations apply “to former inmates for issues that arose during their confinement.” 28 C.F.R. § 542.10(b) (2002). Therefore, Maree-Bey must complete the exhaustion process before pursuing his claim in federal court. 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas E. Maree-Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * SeeMaree-Bey v. Nash , No. CA-02-2584-CCB (D. Md. filed Sept. 10, 2002 & entered Sept. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Dental Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Dental Association 
(``ADA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Dental Association, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of ADA's 
standards development activities are: Development of nomenclature, 
standards and specifications for dental materials, except those 
recognized as drugs or dental radiographic film; development of 
nomenclature, standards and specifications for dental instruments, 
equipment and accessories used in dental practice, dental technology 
and oral hygiene that are offered to the public or the profession. 
Orthodontic, prosthetic, and restorative appliances designed or 
developed by the dentist for an individual patient are excluded. The 
ADA also promotes patient care and oral health through the application 
of information technology to dentistry's clinical and administrative 
operations, developing standards, specifications and technical reports, 
and guidelines for: Components of a computerized dental clinical 
workstation; electronic technologies used in dental practice; and 
interoperability standards for different software and hardware products 
which provide a seamless information exchange throughout all facets of 
healthcare.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26212 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Raymond M. Fernandez, Appellant, against Warden of the County Jail, Nassau County, et al., Respondents.

Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Brillian
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.                     
| |  |                                                 
| |  | Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.                         
| |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

November 12, 2003
Approval 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION 

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting: 

Tuesday, February 23, 2016 

9:30 a.m. 

Attendance 

Discussion of Management Issues (Closed - Ex. 2) 

The Commission voted 4 to 0 on November 25, 2015, to close this 

discussion on Management Issues, on internal personnel practices and 

personal information. 

Commissioners and members of their staffs 

Representatives of the Commission Staff Offices 

Representatives of Executive Director for Operations 

Representative of the Office of the Inspector General and their Contractor 

Contact Person for More Information 

Denise L. McGovern, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0681) 

Denise L. McGovern 

Office of the Secretary 

02/04/2016