alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 15-073 November 9, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Environmental Study

of Fermi 2 Nuclear Plant License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks public comment on a draft report on the 

environmental impacts of renewing the operating license of the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant in 

Michigan. The draft report contains the NRC staff’s preliminary conclusion that the environmental 

impacts would not preclude renewing the license for an additional 20 years of operation.

NRC staff will hold a public meeting Dec. 2, from 7-9 p.m., in Monroe, Mich., to present the 

draft report’s findings and accept public comment. The meeting will be at the Monroe County 

Community College, La-Z-Boy Center, 1555 S. Raisinville Road.

Fermi 2 is a boiling-water reactor located in Newport, Mich., about 25 miles northeast of 

Toledo, Ohio. It is currently licensed to operate through March 20, 2025. The operator, DTE Electric 

Co., submitted the renewal application April 30, 2014.

The NRC’s review of the application consists of a technical safety review and the 

environmental review. The draft supplemental impact statement is supplement 56 to NUREG-1437, 

Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It is now available on 

the NRC’s website.

In a related Federal Register notice published Nov. 6, the NRC provided detailed instructions 

on how to submit written comments on the draft supplemental environmental impact statement. 

Comments will be accepted through Dec. 28.

The Fermi 2 license renewal application and general information about reactor license renewal

are available on the NRC website.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 383]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 5121]]

Public Law 115-383
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Overtime Pay for Protective Services Act of 2016 to extend 
 the Secret Service overtime pay exception through 2020, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2018 -  [H.R. 6893]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Secret Service 
Overtime Pay Extension Act. 5 USC 101 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secret Service Overtime Pay Extension 
Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OVERTIME PAY EXCEPTION THROUGH 2020 FOR 
                    PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Overtime Pay for Protective 
Services Act of 2016 (5 U.S.C. 5547 note), as amended by Public Law 115-
160, is further amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``2018'' and 
        inserting ``2020'';
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``or 2018'' and inserting 
        ``2018, 2019, or 2020''; and
            (3) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``and 2018'' and 
        inserting ``2018, 2019, and 2020''.

    (b) Report on Extensions.--Not later than January 30 of each of 
calendar years 2020 and 2021, the Director of the Secret Service shall 
submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security and 
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of 
Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs of the Senate a report on the effects of the amendments made by 
subsection (a). The report shall include, with respect to the previous 
calendar year, the information described under paragraphs (1) through 
(7) of section 2(c) of Public Law 115-160.

    Approved December 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6893:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-1069 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Dec. 10, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 12.100 Scope and applicability of rules. ( a ) *In general.* The rules set forth in this subpart are applicable only to proceedings forwarded pursuant to § 12.26(a) of the Reparation Rules. The rules of subpart B permitting discovery are applicable in a voluntary decisional proceeding. Unless specifically made applicable, the rules prescribed in subparts D, E, and F shall not apply in a voluntary decisional proceeding.
( b ) *Waiver by electing the voluntary decisional procedure.* By electing the voluntary decisional procedure, parties waive the opportunity for an oral hearing and whatever rights they may have otherwise had: to receive a written statement of the findings of fact upon which the final decision is based; to prejudgment interest in connection with a reparation award; to appeal to the Commission the final decision; and to appeal the final decision to a U.S. Court of Appeals pursuant to section 14(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 18(e).
### §16341. Western Hemisphere energy cooperation

#### (a) Program

The Secretary shall carry out a program to promote cooperation on energy issues with countries of the Western Hemisphere.

#### (b) Activities

Under the program, the Secretary shall fund activities to work with countries of the Western Hemisphere to—

(1) increase the production of energy supplies;

(2) improve energy efficiency; and

(3) assist in the development and transfer of energy supply and efficiency technologies that would have a beneficial impact on world energy markets.

#### (c) Participation by institutions of higher education

To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall carry out the program under this section with the participation of institutions of higher education so as to take advantage of the acceptance of institutions of higher education by countries of the Western Hemisphere as sources of unbiased technical and policy expertise when assisting the Secretary in—

(1) evaluating new technologies;

(2) resolving technical issues;

(3) working with those countries in the development of new policies; and

(4) training policymakers, particularly in the case of institutions of higher education that involve the participation of minority students, such as—

(A) Hispanic-serving institutions; and

(B) part B institutions.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;

(2) $13,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and

(3) $16,000,000 for fiscal year 2009.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §985, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 908.)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Chronology: Swift & Company, January 1942-September 1973

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Chronology: Swift & Company, January 1942-September 1973 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1773*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Dept. of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										1973,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4905,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of
Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, David McCourt, Interim Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d); and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  July 8,
      2008
            
            /s/ David
      McCourtDavid
    McCourtInterim Chief Executive
      Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY     Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Stathy  Darcy, signing singly, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:    (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an  officer and/or director of CNA Financial Corporation (the “Company”), Forms 3, 4,  and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  the rules thereunder; and    (2)    do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be  necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5,  complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file  such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any  stock exchange or similar authority; and    (3)   take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing  which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best  interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the  documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned  pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such  terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in- fact’s discretion.    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to  do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be  done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and  purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of  substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such  attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this  power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges  that the forgoing attorney-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned,  are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned’s responsibilities to  comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    This Power of Attorney shall supersede any existing power of attorney and shall remain  in full force and effect until a successor power of attorney is executed or the undersigned is no  longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned’s holdings of and  transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in  a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be  executed as of this 21st day of July, 2021.              /s/ Susan A. Stone        _________________________        Name: Susan A. Stone
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 16, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01417-CR KARIASA MACHELL THOMAS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-58505-V 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown On May 22, 2015, appellant filed a pro se moti on to dismiss the appeal. A copy of the motion was sent to appellate c ounsel, who was directed to si gn the copy if he concurred in appellant’s decision and return it to the Court. Rather than si gning the copy and returning it to the Court, on May 28, 2015, counsel filed a motion to withdraw as c ounsel, in which he states he conferred with appellant regarding her decision, and that he has confirme d appellant does desire to abandon her appeal. He att ached a copy of appellant’s st atement that she understood the consequences of dismissing her a ppeal, and agreed to counsel’s d ecision to withdraw. On May 29, 2015, appellant filed a second pro se motion to dismiss her appeal. We will read thesedocuments together to constitute a motion to di smiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and this decision be certified be low for observance. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a).
PER CURIAM Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 141417F.U05

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KARIASA MACHELL THOMAS, Appellant
No. 05-14-01417-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-58505-V. Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown. Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered June 16, 2015.
### §10223. Alternative means of financing

The Secretary shall undertake a study with respect to alternative approaches to managing the construction and operation of all civilian radioactive waste management facilities, including the feasibility of establishing a private corporation for such purposes. In conducting such study, the Secretary shall consult with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Chairman of the Commission, and such other Federal agency representatives as may be appropriate. Such study shall be completed, and a report containing the results of such study shall be submitted to the Congress, within 1 year after January 7, 1983.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title III, §303, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2261.)
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - LCA, Louisiana Coastal Area

#  LCA, Louisiana Coastal Area 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Jun, 2019

**Description:**
The Louisiana Coastal Area (LCA) Program - as authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 - is a systematic approach to coastal restoration using critical near-term ecosystem restoration projects and large-scale, long-term studies and programs to restore natural features and ecosystem processes.  The LCA Program is being developed and implemented in partnership with the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana (CPRA) and aims to slow the current trend of coast-wide wetland loss and resource degradation.  Several restoration techniques are employed in this program, including river diversions, marsh creation and barrier island restoration.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Military & Veterans,     	    Environment & Energy

**Creator:**    	    U.S. Department of Defense,     	    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://www.lca.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/Missions/Environmental/Louisiana-Coastal-Area/CriticalNearTermProjects/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44934, 333-85058, 333-99793, 333-110937,
333-112864) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-85694, 333-88608, 333-99697) of Proxim
Corporation of our report dated March 11, 2004 appearing on this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 11, 2004
Exhibit 10.1


Amendment
No. 1

to

SatCon Technology Corporation

2005 Incentive Compensation Plan


The SatCon
Technology Corporation 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby
amended by deleting the first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan and replacing
it with the following:


“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10(c) hereof, the total
number of Shares reserved and available for delivery under the Plan shall be
4,000,000.”


Except as herein
amended, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


AS APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS:  March 15, 2007


AS APPROVED BY THE
STOCKHOLDERS:  June 5, 2007
5334.7002 Policy

(d)(4) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-002 January 12, 2004

NRC HISTORIAN WRITES PERSPECTIVE ON

 THREE MILE ISLAND INCIDENT, 25 YEARS LATER

J. Samuel Walker, historian for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), has written the

fourth volume of the agency’s history, Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective . 

The book, published by the University of California Press, is expected to be available in

bookstores in time for the 25th anniversary of the Three Mile Island accident on March 28, 2004. It is

available now for advance purchase at http://www.amazon.com and http://www.barnesandnoble.com .

The book considers the issues surrounding nuclear power in the 1970s as a prelude to focusing

on the days when the event unfolded, March 28 - April 1, 1979. During that time, a combination of

equipment failures and operator error led to a partial melting of the fuel in Unit 2 of the Three Mile

Island complex. Of particular interest are sections covering the evacuation recommendation for

pregnant women and preschool-age children, as well as concerns over a buildup of hydrogen in the

damaged reactor.

This was the most serious accident in the history of commercial nuclear power in the United

States. Walker also covers both the immediate aftermath of the accident and the investigations into

possible long-term effects.

“[Three Mile Island’s] results suggested that nuclear proponents had underestimated the risks of

a major accident at a nuclear plant in the United States,” Walker writes, “and nuclear critics had

overstated the likely consequences.” The accident prompted wide-ranging reforms that increased

safety at U.S. nuclear plants, but TMI also significantly eroded public confidence in plants’ abilities to

operate safely, Walker concludes.

Other volumes on the history of the NRC, also written by Walker, include Controlling the

Atom, Containing the Atom, and Permissible Dose .

###
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3831 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3831

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
 recognition of attending physician assistants as attending physicians 
                       to serve hospice patients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2012

 Mr. Terry (for himself and Mr. Thompson of California) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
 recognition of attending physician assistants as attending physicians 
                       to serve hospice patients.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Hospice Care Access Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AS ATTENDING 
              PHYSICIANS TO SERVE HOSPICE PATIENTS.

    (a) Recognition of Attending Physician Assistants as Attending 
Physicians To Serve Hospice Patients.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1861(dd)(3)(B) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(dd)(3)(B)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``or nurse'' and inserting ``, the 
                nurse''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, or the physician assistant (as 
                defined in such subsection)'' after ``subsection 
                (aa)(5))''.
            (2) Clarification of hospice role of physician 
        assistants.--Section 1814(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the Social Security 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)(7)(A)(i)(I)) is amended by inserting 
        ``or a physician assistant'' after ``a nurse practitioner''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
### §16901. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16901 was editorially reclassified as section 20901 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.