alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III

2443 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. III-13-014

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil (630) 829-9663

April 26, 2013

E-Mail: OPA3.RegionIII@nrc.gov 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT LASALLE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started a Special Inspection to review the 

circumstances around the loss of offsite power to both LaSalle Units 1 and 2 on April 17. 

The two Mark II boiling water reactors are operated by Exelon Generation Co., and are 

located in Marseilles, Ill., roughly 11 miles southeast of Ottawa.

The issue involved a lightning strike that resulted in the loss of external power to Unit 1 

and 2. Both units automatically shut down and all control rods were inserted. The emergency 

diesel generators started and powered the safety-related systems as planned. Both the Region III 

staff and the resident inspectors at the plant closely followed the event.

“There was no threat to the safety of the reactors associated with this event but having 

two units shut down after an event is not typical and raises questions.” said NRC Region III 

Administrator Charles Casto. “Our inspectors will look closely at the event and help us get a 

better picture of what happened and why.”

On Monday, a three-member inspection team began work and will look into the 

circumstances surrounding the loss of external power. The team’s actions will include gathering 

information to establish a timeline of events, reviewing the cause of the event, and evaluating the 

utility’s actions during and after the incident. The team will also assess equipment performance, 

a drywell pressure signal, and review the plant’s radiological monitoring throughout the event.

The NRC will issue a report on the Special Inspection within 45 days of its completion. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

2016 Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan

June 30, 2016

Agency Contact

Ian Fisher, P.E., LEED AP, CEM

301-415-6528

Ian.fisher@nrc.gov
2 

Table of Contents 

Policy Statement ......................................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4

Size & Scope of Agency Operations .......................................................................................................... 7

Agency Progress and Strategies to Meet Federal Sustainability Goals ...................................................... 8

Goal 1: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction ............................................................................................ 8

Goal 2: Sustainable Buildings ................................................................................................................. 9

Goal 4: Water Use Efficiency & Management ..................................................................................... 10

Goal 5: Fleet Management .................................................................................................................... 11

Goal 7: Pollution Prevention & Waste Reduction ................................................................................ 13

Climate Adaptation Plan ........................................................................................................................... 14
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00221-CR

IN RE John Bernard WILLIAMS, III, Relator

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 19, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 8, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the attached exhibits, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CR6240, styled The State of Texas v. John Bernard Williams, III, 

pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
### §13962. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13962 was editorially reclassified as section 12332 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### In the Matter of Brian L., Also Known as Mariah L., Respondent, v Administration for Children’s Services, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 257]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.H.O.), entered on or about January 18, 2006, which granted the Law Guardian’s motion for an order directing the Administration for Children’s Services to arrange for petitioner to have sex reassignment surgery, unanimously reversed, on the law, *326without costs, and the matter remanded to appellant agency for further proceedings.

This case involves the issue of whether the Family Court properly ordered the Commissioner of Social Services for the City of New York to pay for sex reassignment surgery for a 20-year-old child in foster care. While the record contains evidence that the operation is the generally recognized successful treatment for gender identity disorder, the record is incomplete, and, therefore, this issue is not yet ripe for determination.

The Commissioner should have provided the Family Court with a clear statement of the reasons for denial of this surgery *(see e.g. Matter of Mid-Is. Hosp. v Wyman, 15*NY2d 374, 378 [1965]), and, consequently, we remand for that purpose *(see*CPLR 7806 [court may direct specified action by respondent]). The appellate arguments supporting the Commissioner’s denial are speculative as the record is silent as to any basis or rationale for such denial. Furthermore, the Family Court should determine whether a fact-finding hearing is warranted once the Commissioner articulates the reasons for denying petitioner’s request. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Primitivo YBARRA, also known as Munch, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10781

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 15, 2007.

Chad Eugene Meacham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Paul Snell, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Primitivo Ybarra was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea of conspiring to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute cocaine. He challenges as unreasonable the 180-month sentence of imprisonment imposed in his case. Ybarra contends that the district court improperly considered his 2004 arrest for aggravated assault and the facts underlying that arrest in determining where within his properly calculated sentencing guidelines range his sentence should fall.

Ybarra has cited no statute, guidelines section, or decision of this court precluding a district court from considering a defendant’s arrest record or the facts underlying his arrest in determining where within an advisory sentencing guidelines range a sentence should fall. The information in Ybarra’s presentence report pertaining to his 2004 arrest for aggravated assault had sufficient indicia of reliability to be considered at sentencing. *See United States v.*
      *192
      *Alford,*142 F.3d 825, 831-32 (5th Cir.1998). As Ybarra presented no rebuttal evidence to prove that the information was materially untrue, inaccurate, or unreliable, the district court was entitled to consider it. *See id.*

Ybarra has not shown that the district court district court clearly erred in exercising its broad sentencing discretion by imposing a sentence that failed to “account for a factor that should have received significant weight,” gave “significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor,” or represented “a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” *See United States v. Nikonova,*480 F.3d 371, 376 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(May 21, 2007) (06-11834). Accordingly, Ybarra has not rebutted this court’s assumption that his sentence imposed in his case is reasonable. *United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §15854. Sugar Cane Ethanol Program

#### (a) Definition of program

In this section, the term "program" means the Sugar Cane Ethanol Program established by subsection (b).

#### (b) Establishment

There is established within the Environmental Protection Agency a program to be known as the "Sugar Cane Ethanol Program".

#### (c) Project

#### (1) In general

Subject to the availability of appropriations under subsection (d), in carrying out the program, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall establish a project that is—

(A) carried out in multiple States—

(i) in each of which is produced cane sugar that is eligible for loans under section 7272 of title 7, or a similar subsequent authority; and

(ii) at the option of each such State, that have an incentive program that requires the use of ethanol in the State; and

(B) designed to study the production of ethanol from cane sugar, sugarcane, and sugarcane byproducts.

#### (2) Requirements

A project described in paragraph (1) shall—

(A) be limited to sugar producers and the production of ethanol in the States of Florida, Louisiana, Texas, and Hawaii, divided equally among the States, to demonstrate that the process may be applicable to cane sugar, sugarcane, and sugarcane byproducts;

(B) include information on the ways in which the scale of production may be replicated once the sugar cane industry has located sites for, and constructed, ethanol production facilities; and

(C) not last more than 3 years.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $36,000,000, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §208, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 656.)
§ 500.23 Expression of net quantity of contents in SI Metric units. ( a ) The selected multiple or submultiple prefixes for SI metric units shall result in numerical values between 1 and 1000, except that centimeters or millimeters may be used where a length declaration is less than 100 centimeters. For example, “1.96 kg” instead of “1960 g” and “750 mL” instead of “0.75 L”.
( b ) The following symbols for SI metric units and none others may be employed in the required net quantity declaration:
centimeter—cm cubic centimeter—cm3 cubic decimeter—dm3 meter—m milligram—mg liter—L or l milliliter—mL or ml square decimeter—dm2 cubic meter—m3 kilogram—kg micrometer—μm gram—g millimeter—mm square meter—m2 square centimeter—cm2
Note:
Symbols, except for liter, are not capitalized. Periods should not be used after the symbol. Symbols are always written in the singular form.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-144742, 333-136072, 333-118610, 333-107466, 333-66676, 333-51656, and 333-48026) pertaining tovarious stock incentive and option plans and in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-133018, 333-119431, 333-112759, and 333-104305) pertaining to various stock offerings ofTeleCommunication Systems, Inc. of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Telecommunication Systems, Inc. and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Telecommunication Systems, Inc.included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2007./s/Ernst & Young LLPBaltimore, Maryland
### §15081. Purpose

The purpose of this part is to provide grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements for projects of national significance that—

(1) create opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities to directly and fully contribute to, and participate in, all facets of community life; and

(2) support the development of national and State policies that reinforce and promote, with the support of families, guardians, advocates, and communities, of individuals with developmental disabilities, the self-determination, independence, productivity, and integration and inclusion in all facets of community life of such individuals through—

(A) family support activities;

(B) data collection and analysis;

(C) technical assistance to entities funded under parts B and D, subject to the limitations described in sections 15029(b), 15066(a)(3), and 15083(c) of this title; and

(D) other projects of sufficient size and scope that hold promise to expand or improve opportunities for such individuals, including—

(i) projects that provide technical assistance for the development of information and referral systems;

(ii) projects that provide technical assistance to self-advocacy organizations of individuals with developmental disabilities;

(iii) projects that provide education for policymakers;

(iv) Federal interagency initiatives;

(v) projects that enhance the participation of racial and ethnic minorities in public and private sector initiatives in developmental disabilities;

(vi) projects that provide aid to transition youth with developmental disabilities from school to adult life, especially in finding employment and postsecondary education opportunities and in upgrading and changing any assistive technology devices that may be needed as a youth matures;

(vii) initiatives that address the development of community quality assurance systems and the training related to the development, implementation, and evaluation of such systems, including training of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families;

(viii) initiatives that address the needs of aging individuals with developmental disabilities and aging caregivers of adults with developmental disabilities in the community;

(ix) initiatives that create greater access to and use of generic services systems, community organizations, and associations, and initiatives that assist in community economic development;

(x) initiatives that create access to increased living options;

(xi) initiatives that address the challenging behaviors of individuals with developmental disabilities, including initiatives that promote positive alternatives to the use of restraints and seclusion; and

(xii) initiatives that address other areas of emerging need.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §161, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1725.)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3892 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3892

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    8771 Auburn Folsom Road in Roseville, California, as the ``Lance 
                  Corporal Victor A. Dew Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL VICTOR A. DEW POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8771 Auburn Folsom Road in Roseville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Victor A. Dew Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Victor A. Dew Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Augustus D. Juilliard et al., Defendants in Error, v. Jacob Friedman, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,147.

(Not to be reported in full.)

. Abstract of the Decision.

1. Sales, § *344*
      ***
      *—what is measure of damages where purchaser refuses to accept goods.*Where the purchaser of goods refuses to accept the same and the goods are permanently retained hy the seller or resold hy him, in an action against the purchaser the measure of damages is not the full contract price, hut the excess, if any, of the contract price over the market price of the goods at the time and place of the delivery to the defendant.

2. Evidence, § *58*—when evidence of private custom inadmissible.*In an action by the sellers of goods against the purchaser who refused to accept same, claiming that he had never ordered the goods, evidence of a private custom of plaintiffs unknown to defendant, as to their method of sending out bills for goods sold, *held*erroneously admitted.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Gtjllivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 11, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Augustus D. Juilliard and others against Jacob Friedman to recover for the contract price of silk alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant, and which defendant denied having ordered. Judgment in a prior trial was reversed in 174 111. App. 259. Upon the second trial plaintiff again recovered judgment, from which defendant brings error.

Julius Heldman and Simon La Grou, for plaintiff in error.

Edward J. Queeny and William J. Lacey, for defendants in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 906.13 Failure to appear. If any party fails to appear at a pre-hearing conference or hearing after proper notice, an appellate officer may: ( a ) Dismiss the case, or;
( b ) Deem the failure of a party to appear after proper notice a waiver of any right to a hearing and consent to the making of a decision based on the NAO case record.
#### § 210.4-04 Omission of substantially identical notes.

If a note covering substantially the same subject matter is required with respect to two or more financial statements relating to the same or affiliated persons, for which separate sets of notes are presented, the required information may be shown in a note to only one of such statements: *Provided,* That a clear and specific reference thereto is made in each of the other statements with respect to which the note is required.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-065 December 13, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: Opa@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORP. TO DISCUSS

PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT PERFORMANCE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with U. S. Enrichment Corp. officials in

Piketon, Ohio, on Thursday, December 19, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of

performance at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. The plant formerly processed uranium for use as

fuel in nuclear power plants and is currently on a standby status.

The meeting will be held at 2 p.m. (EST) at Ohio State University, South Center, 1864 Shyville

Road, in Piketon, Ohio. The public is invited to observe the meeting and will have an opportunity to make

comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

This performance review, which covers the period of October 1, 2000, through September 30 of

this year, focused on four major areas: safety operations, safeguards, radiological control and facility

support. The review concluded that the performance of Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in the area of

safeguards was adequate and needed no improvement. The plant’s performance in the areas of safety

operations, radiological controls and facility support was evaluated as adequate but needing improvement

in the quality of procedures and adherence to procedures, contamination control practices, configuration

control and the implementation of the corrective actions program. 

The meeting will focus on details of NRC’s review, USEC’s evaluation of the same major areas of

performance and the company’s plans to address the NRC’s concerns.

The outline of the performance review and the performance review letter are available from the

NRC’s Region III Office of Public Affairs, the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 and in

the agency’s ADAMS electronic reading room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

###
3401.000 Scope of part.

This part establishes a system of Department of Education (Department) acquisition regulations,

referred to as the Education Acquisition Regulation (EDAR), for the codification and publication of

policies and procedures of the Department that implement and supplement the Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR).

Parent topic: PART 3401—ED ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3948 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3948

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 182.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Red 182.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID RED 182.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Acid Red 182,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (Cobaltate(1-),                                                    31/2014.......
                        bis[4-(hydroxy-
                        kO)-3-[2-[2-
                        (hydroxy-kO)-1-
                        naphthalenyl]diaz
                        enyl-
                        kN1]benzenesulfon
                        amidato(2-)]-,
                        sodium (1:1))
                        (CAS No. 58302-43-
                        5) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3204.12.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```