alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leon Decorating Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [191 Misc. 89.]
#### Charles R. Benjamin, Respondent, v. Walter Howe, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1,310.80, being the balance of $1,160 due on a promissory note and $150.80 interest. The judgment was amended by order entered March 19, 1953, so as to add $125.80 costs, making a total of $1,436.60. Amended judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur; *1067Schmidt, J., dissents and votes to modify the amended judgment by allowing defendant a setoff of $284, reducing the amount of recovery on the note to $876, with interest on that amount from December 7, 1950, and $125.80 costs, with the following memorandum: The action was to recover the balance due on a nonnegotiable note given by defendant to plaintiff in payment for a used airplane, or to recover the balance due for goods sold and delivered. There was evidence that on December 7, 1950, when defendant purchased the airplane, $384 was due from plaintiff to the airfield where the airplane was stored, for storage and handling. Although plaintiff introduced in evidence a receipted bill for payment in full, the evidence indicates that plaintiff had made a cash payment of $100 and had authorized the airfield to retain miscellaneous material from the airplane in payment of the $284 balance. There was no direct proof that this arrangement was made with defendant’s consent. Therefore, the airplane, for which the promissory note was given in payment, was never delivered to defendant. As this action is between the maker and payee of the note, in my opinion, defendant is entitled to a setoff of $284, which amount must be naid before defendant can obtain delivery of the airplane.
No: IV-16-019 September 6, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss Apparent Violation

At Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from the Wolf Creek Nuclear 

Operating Co. on Sept. 21 to discuss a preliminary finding regarding the licensee’s failure to adequately 

maintain emergency diesel generators at the Wolf Creek nuclear power plant located near Burlington, 

Kan.

The 8 a.m. meeting at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas, is 

open to the public. NRC officials will answer questions from the public after the business portion of the 

meeting. A telephone bridge will be available for the meeting by calling 888-790-5880 and entering 

passcode 6252642.

Emergency diesel generators are used to supply power to safety-related systems in the event of a 

loss of off-site power. NRC requires that Wolf Creek have emergency diesel generators that must be 

tested monthly to ensure operability. During a test, one emergency diesel generator started as required, 

but failed three hours into a 24-hour run because of a faulty electrical component. 

The issue did not pose an immediate safety concern because other means existed to supply 

emergency power to vital plant equipment had it been needed. Repairs have been made to the 

emergency diesel generator and a preventive maintenance strategy has been developed. The issue is 

described in an NRC inspection report.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear plants with a color-coded 

process that classifies inspection findings as green, white, yellow or red in order of increasing safety 

significance. The NRC has preliminarily determined that the inspection finding has low to moderate 

(white) safety significance, which may require additional inspections, regulatory actions and oversight.

No decision on the final safety significance of the finding or any additional NRC actions will be 

made at the conference. That decision will be announced at a later time.
Subpart 541.1 - General

Parent topic: Part 541 - Acquisition of Utility Services

541.100 Scope of part.

(a) This part applies to the acquisition of utility services from regulated utilities with the exception

of section 541.202-1, which covers acquisition planning for deregulated utilities.

(b) Acquisitions from deregulated suppliers for natural gas and/or electricity shall use the

competitive policies and procedures as prescribed in part 512.

541.101 Definitions.

As used in this part—

“Independent regulatory body” means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a state-wide

agency, or an agency with less than state-wide jurisdiction when operating pursuant to state

authority that has the power to fix, establish, or control the rates and services of utility suppliers.

541.103 Statutory and delegated authority.

Proceedings before Federal and state regulatory bodies shall be coordinated through the Public

Buildings Service, Office of Facilities Management, Energy Division, in addition to any other GSA

office as directed by internal policies or procedures.
### §14136b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14136b was editorially reclassified as section 40724 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 1028.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 1028.101(i) or exempted under § 1028.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:25 AM

To: Lloyd, David; Dressler, Jason; Fortin, Kelly; Land, Eva; McNeal, Dave

Cc: Grygar, Bill; Maness, Katie; Rahul Pendse

(rpendse@trinityconsultants.com); JSerne@trcsolutions.com

Subject: Emissions Testing Report for the Main Engines on the Diamond BlackHawk

- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Attachments: Emissions Test of the Main Engines on the Diamond BlackHawk

-

Anadarko P etroleum Corporation.pdf

Good morning. Attached is the Emissions Testing Report for the Diamond BlackHawk. Due to the size of

the report I haven’t included the appendices. A paper copy and cd of the full report with appendices will

be shipped out to the EPA Region 4 office address on Monday, July 14.

Please acknowledge you have received this email and if you have any questions please feel free to

contact me.

Thanks,

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Sr HSE Representative, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaime r
January 8, 2016 

The Honorable Harry Reid 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Reid: 

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, I am providing the remaining 

responses to questions in your letter of October 29, 2015, regarding transportation packages for 

spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Our responses to your requests 1, 2, and 4 

were transmitted to you on December 11, 2015. Enclosed with this letter are the responses to 

your requests 3, 5, and 6. For each transportation package, we include information provided by 

the applicant regarding all physical tests performed, a description of methods and analyses 

used, and test results. 

I appreciate your patience while we completed our responses to you. If you have any 

questions about the enclosed materials, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the 

Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Harry Reid 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Dean Heller 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 388 

To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals detained 

at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2011 

Mr. ROONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals detained at the facility be tried 

only by military commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Detainee Trials at 

5 Gitmo Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 388 IH

1 SEC. 2. DETENTION FACILITY AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTA2 NAMO BAY, CUBA TO REMAIN OPEN AND RE3 QUIREMENT THAT INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 

4 AT THAT FACILITY BE TRIED ONLY BY MILI5 TARY COMMISSION. 

6 (a) DETENTION FACILITY.—The detention facility at 

7 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba shall remain in 

8 use indefinitely by the United States as a detention facil9 ity. 

10 (b) TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION.—Any indi11 vidual who is detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo 

12 Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 

13 may only be tried by military commission under chapter 

14 47A of title 10, United States Code. Any trial of such an 

15 individual by military commission shall be conducted at 

16 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John J. ShermanJohn J. Sherman Chief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,

acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written

statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished

to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



39
### §8505. Audit

For the purpose of audit and examination, the Comptroller General shall have access to the books, documents, papers, and other records of—

(1) the Committee and of each central nonprofit agency the Committee designates under section 8503(c) of this title; and

(2) qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind and qualified nonprofit agencies for other severely disabled that have sold products or services under this chapter to the extent those books, documents, papers, and other records relate to the activities of the agency in a fiscal year in which a sale was made under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3838.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 8505 | 41:48a. | June 25, 1938, ch. 697, §4, 52 Stat. 1196; Pub. L. 92–28, §1, June 23, 1971, 85 Stat. 81. |

Section

In this section, before paragraph (1), the words "or any of his duly authorized representatives" are omitted because of 31:711(2). In paragraph (1), the words "central nonprofit" are added for clarity.
### §16013. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VI, §636, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 791.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle B (§§621–639) of title VI of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 782, which enacted this part and sections 2015b, 2210c, and 5853 of this title, amended sections 2133, 2135, 2158, 2160d, 2201, 2210a, 2214, 2297h–8, and 5851 of this title, repealed section 2213 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 2158 and 2214 of this title. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Tables.
§ 201.460 Record before the Commission. The Commission shall determine each matter on the basis of the record. ( a ) *Contents of the record.* ( 1 ) In proceedings for final decision before the Commission other than those reviewing a determination by a self-regulatory organization, the record shall consist of: ( i ) All items part of the record below in accordance with § 201.350;
( ii ) Any petitions for review, cross-petitions or oppositions; and
( iii ) All briefs, motions, submissions and other papers filed on appeal or review.
( 2 ) In a proceeding for final decision before the Commission reviewing a determination by a self-regulatory organization, the record shall consist of: ( i ) The record certified pursuant to § 201.420(d) by the self-regulatory organization;
( ii ) Any application for review; and
( iii ) Any submissions, moving papers, and briefs filed on appeal or review.
( 3 ) In a proceeding for final decision before the Commission reviewing a determination of the Board, the record shall consist of: ( i ) The record certified pursuant to § 201.440(d) by the Board;
( ii ) Any application for review; and
( iii ) Any submissions, moving papers, and briefs filed on appeal or review.
( 4 ) In a proceeding for final decision before the Commission reviewing a determination of a security-based swap execution facility, the record shall consist of: ( i ) The record certified pursuant to § 201.442(d) by the security-based swap execution facility;
( ii ) Any application for review; and
( iii ) Any submissions, moving papers, and briefs filed on appeal or review.
( b ) *Transmittal of record to Commission.* Within 14 days after the last date set for filing briefs or such later date as the Commission directs, the Secretary shall transmit the record to the Commission.
( c ) *Review of documents not admitted.* Any document offered in evidence but excluded by the hearing officer or the Commission and any document marked for identification but not offered as an exhibit shall not be considered a part of the record before the Commission on appeal but shall be transmitted to the Commission by the Secretary if so requested by the Commission. In the event that the Commission does not request the document, the Secretary shall retain the document not admitted into the record until the later of: ( 1 ) The date upon which the Commission's order becomes final, or
( 2 ) The conclusion of any judicial review of that order.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13180, Mar. 19, 2004; 88 FR 87232, Dec. 15, 2023]
Exhibit 10.20

SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY'S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors are paid $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, $1,000 per Board meeting conducted by telephone, $1,500 for each
Audit Committee meeting attended, whether in person or by phone, $1,000 for each Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each
Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee or Special Committee meeting conducted by telephone. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional fee of $8,000 per year and the
Compensation Committee Chairman is paid an additional fee of $4,000 per year for their services as such. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses related to attendance at meetings.

In
accordance with the Company's 2000 Director Stock Option Plan, any non-employee director first elected to the Board will receive a stock option award of 50,000 shares.
Each year, as of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each non-employee director will receive a stock option award of 15,000 shares.

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Dimon, Appellant.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux Corn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”)for the three month fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Stephen Roe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Stephen Roe                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen Roe                           |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2006                |

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut ) 

Services, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. NNA06CD65C ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 61267, 61772 

Karen L. Manos, Esq. 

Erin N. Rankin, Esq. 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 

Washington, DC 

Scott W. Barber, Esq. 

NASA Chief Trial Attorney 

Daniel C. Hymer, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

NASA Ames Research Center 

Moffett Field, CA 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WOODROW 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' settlement of their dispute and September 16, 2019 Joint Request for Entry of 

Consent Judgment, that these appeals and Respondent's Counterclaim are sustained. 

In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award in the amount 

of$3,000,000.00. This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be 

paid. 

Dated: September 23, 2019 

(Signatures continued) 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

J 

0\dministr tive Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

v ___ 

OWEN C. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61267, 61772, Appeals of 

Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc., rendered in conformance 

with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-17-0037:  Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2016

Accession Number: ML16341B376

Date Released: Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16341B433 - SECY-17-0037:  Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurences: Fiscal Year 2016 (3 page(s), 3/2/2017)
    - ML16341B479 - SECY-17-0037:  Enclosure 1 - Draft Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences - Fiscal Year 2016 (43 page(s), 3/2/2017)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 1270.3 Prohibited stockpiling. ( a ) *Prohibited acts.* Manufacturers and importers of adult portable bed rails (APBRs) shall not manufacture or import APBRs that do not comply with the requirements of this part between July 21, 2023, and August 21, 2023, at a rate that is greater than 105 percent of the rate at which they manufactured or imported APBRs during the base period for the manufacturer or importer.
( b ) *Base period.* The base period for APBRs is the calendar month with the median manufacturing or import volume within the last 13 months immediately preceding July 21, 2023.
### §14954. No private right of action

The Convention and this chapter shall not be construed to create a private right of action to seek administrative or judicial relief, except to the extent expressly provided in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 106–279, title V, §504, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 843.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–279, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 825, known as the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14901 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon entry into force for the United States of the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, pursuant to Article 46(2)(a) of the Convention, with transition rule, see section 505(a)(2), (b) of Pub. L. 106–279, set out as an Effective Dates; Transition Rule note under section 14901 of this title.