alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 141.4 Notice requirements. ( a ) Deductions shall not be made unless the employee is provided with written notice of the debt at least 30 days before salary offset commences.
( b ) The written notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is owed and an explanation of its nature, and amount;
( 2 ) The agency's intention to collect the debt by deducting from the employee's current disposable pay account;
( 3 ) The amount, frequency, proposed beginning date, and duration of the intended deduction(s);
( 4 ) An explanation of interest, penalties, and administrative charges, including a statement that such charges will be assessed unless excused in accordance with the Federal Claims Collections Standards at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.*;
( 5 ) The employee's right to inspect, request, and receive a copy of government records relating to the debt;
( 6 ) The opportunity to establish a written schedule for the voluntary repayment of the debt;
( 7 ) The right to a hearing conducted by an impartial hearing official;
( 8 ) The methods and time period for petitioning for hearings;
( 9 ) A statement that the timely filing of a petition for a hearing will stay the commencement of collection proceedings;
( 10 ) A statement that a final decision on the hearing will be issued not later than 60 days after the filing of the petition requesting the hearing unless the employee requests and the hearing official grants a delay in the proceedings;
( 11 ) A statement that knowingly false or frivolous statements, representations, or evidence may subject the employee to: ( i ) Disciplinary procedures appropriate under chapter 75 of 5 U.S.C., 5 CFR part 752, or any other applicable statutes or regulations;
( ii ) Penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3731, or any other applicable statutory authority; or
( iii ) Criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. 286, 287, 1001, and 1002 or any other applicable statutory authority.
( 12 ) A statement of other rights and remedies available to the employee under statutes or regulations governing the program for which the collection is being made; and
( 13 ) Unless there are contractual or statutory provisions to the contrary, a statement that amounts paid on or deducted for the debt which are later waived or found not owed to the United States will be promptly refunded to the employee.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1504-DR]


Federated States of Micronesia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a 
Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Federated States of Micronesia (FEMA-1504-DR), dated December 
19, 2003, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Federated States of Micronesia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of December 19, 2003:

    Chuuk State for emergency protective measures (Category B) under 
the Public Assistance program, limited to distribution of food 
commodities (already designated for Individual Assistance limited to 
Emergency Food Assistance through USDA for the islands of Namonuito 
Atoll, the Hall Islands, and the Western Islands within Chuuk 
State.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, 
Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individual and Household Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-2668 Filed 2-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
No: 15-064 October 14, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Remains a Top Performer in Government Survey

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission remains a top place to work in the federal government 

according to the results from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint survey, exceeding governmentwide results in a number of key areas. 

“The NRC continues to be a great place to work, even in these challenging times,” said NRC 

Chairman Stephen G. Burns. “An engaged and satisfied workforce is the NRC’s greatest asset in 

achieving its mission to protect public health and the environment in regulating the nuclear industry.”

The survey is conducted annually by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. In governmentwide results released Oct. 6, the NRC tied for third among large agencies (800 or more employees) in 

“global satisfaction” with a 74 percent index score, a 1 percent increase over last year. The 

government-wide score was 60 percent. The NRC also ranked fifth in overall “employee engagement” 

with a score of 75 percent, compared to 64 percent government-wide. Global satisfaction measures 

employees’ job, organizational and pay satisfaction, as well as whether they would recommend their 

agency to others as a good place to work. Overall employee engagement summarizes the results of 

several indices in the survey measuring areas agencies can focus on to promote an engaged workforce. 

The indices combine the results from several specific survey questions to give a broader picture based 

on positive responses.

Of the seven major indices measured by OPM, the NRC either remained constant or improved 

by one or two percentage points compared to 2014 results. In addition to engagement and global 

satisfaction, these indices include a new index measuring diversity and inclusion.

This year the NRC had its highest survey response rate since the survey began in 2002. With 75 

percent participation, the data collected from FEVS provides comprehensive and credible feedback that 

will allow the agency to precisely target specific areas for improvement. The NRC’s participation rate 

far exceeds the 50 percent government-wide response rate. 

The annual survey evaluates the management leadership, employee satisfaction and 

organizational culture of federal agencies. Specifically, it measures employees’ perception of whether, 

and to what extent, their organizations have the types of characteristics typically associated with high 

performing, successful organizations. The NRC encourages employees to participate, as the results of 

the survey are a key source for obtaining input from staff, continually improving and maintaining an 

effective workforce.
HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25994 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25995 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25996 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25997 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25998 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 25999 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26000 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26001 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26002 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26003 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26004 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26005 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26006 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26007 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26008 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26009 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26010 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26011 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26012 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26013 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26014 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26015 1988HeinOnline -- 53 Fed. Reg. 26016 1988
No: 16-044 July 27, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to Hold Oral Argument Aug. 3

on Hearing Request for Vogtle New Reactor Amendment

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a 

teleconference Wed., Aug. 3, to hear oral arguments on a hearing request regarding a license 

amendment request for two new reactors at the Vogtle site in Georgia. The board is the independent 

body within the NRC that conducts adjudicatory hearings and renders decisions on legal challenges to 

licensing actions.

The Board will hear arguments on contentions filed by the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense 

League and its chapter, Concerned Citizens of Shell Bluff. The contentions challenge Southern 

Nuclear’s request to amend details of the Vogtle new reactor licenses regarding safety features called 

hydrogen igniters. 

The teleconference will begin at 9:30 a.m. on Aug. 3, with the Board participating from the 

ALSB Hearing Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. Members of the public and media are 

welcome to observe the teleconference in person or listen via telephone, but participation will be 

limited to the parties, lawyers and witnesses. Those interested in attending or listening should contact 

Cooper Strickland at 301-415-5880 or Cooper.Strickland@nrc.gov by July 29. Those planning to attend 

should arrive at least 15 minutes early to allow time for security screening. No signs or any type of 

demonstration will be permitted in the hearing room.

Documents related to the hearing request are available on the NRC’s Electronic Hearing Docket

by clicking on the folder entitled “Vogtle 52-025 and 52-026-LA-2” on the left side of the page. More 

information about the role of the ASLB in the licensing process is available on the NRC website.
### The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Un ited States District 1 

### Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the rep ort and re commendationof the Honorable William A. Knox, United State s Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-2313

___________ Leonard Rogers, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Steve Long; Dave Dormire; * Western District of Missouri. Daniel Kempker; Earl Halden; * John Moore, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 19, 1997 Filed: February 26, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leonard Rogers, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the District Court's 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having reviewed the record andt he parties' briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the Distric t Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### Volcano hazards at Newberry Volcano, Oregon

By: David R. Sherrod**Larry G. Mastin**William E. Scott**Steven P. Schilling

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97513

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Subpart 5341. 1 – GENERAL               **Parent topic:** Part 5341 - Acquisition of Utility Services5341.102 Applicability       (b)(3) When contracting for CATV services, ensure compliance with 47 U.S.C. 521-573, Cable Communications.
#### William Noll, Respondent, v. The Standard Oil Cloth Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., dissented.
1185571-R B SDM S



# STAT E OFCOLORAD O
Joh n W
. Hickenlooper , Governo r Christophe rE
. Urbina , MD , MP H Executiv e Directo ran d Chie f Medica l Office r Dedicate d t o protectin g an d improvin g th e healt h an d environmen t o f th e peopl e of Colorad o 430 0 CherryCree k

Dr
. S

. LaboratoryService s Divisio n Denver , Colorado 80246-153 0 810 0 Lowr yBlvd
. Phon e (303 ) 692-200 0 Denver , Colorad o 80230-692 8 Colorad o Departmen t Locate d i n Glendale , Colorad o (303 ) 692-309 0 rp ^ i • . X
. , http://www.cdphe.state.co.u s an d Environmen t February 16 , 201 1 Lind aKiefe r Remediatio n Projec t

Manager U.S
. EPA , Regio n 8 159 5 Wynkoo p Stree t

(EPR-SR ) Denver , Colorad o 8020 2 RE : CDPH E Concurrenc e o n Partia l Deletio n o f Operabl e Uni t9 o f

th e Californi aGulc h Superfun d Sit e Dear Ms
. Kiefer : Th e Colorad o Departmen t o f Publi c Health an dEnvironmen t ha s review^e

dboth th e Notic e o f

Inten t fo r Partia l Deletio n an dth e direc t final Notic e o f

Partia l Deletio n for

Operabl e Unit

9 ofth e Californi a Gulc hSuperfun dSite
. EP A an dth e Stat e hav e determine dtha t al l appropriat e respons e action s unde r th e Comprehensiv e Environmenta l Response , Compensation , an dLiability Ac t (CERCLA) , othe r

tha n operatio n an d maintenance , monitoring , an dfive-year reviews , hav e bee n completed
. Furthermore , institutiona l control s (ICs ) ar e i n plac e i n th e for mo f acounty ordinanc e for

associate dwast e pile s an di n th e for mo f th e Lak e Count y Community Health Progra m(LCCHP ) Phas e 2 Wor k Pla n i n orde r

t o ensur e long-term protectivenes s ofth e remedy
. Th e LCCH P Phas e 2 Wor k Pla n addresse s th e operatio n an dmaintenanc e requirement s an dserve s a s part ofth e IC s for

Operabl e Uni t

9
. EP A wil l continu e t o conduc t five-year reviews
. Therefor e CDPH E agree s tha t al l necessar y action s hav e bee n take n t o delet e Operabl e Uni t 9 ofth e Californi aGulc h Superfiin dSit e fi-omth e Nationa l Prioritie s List
. Sincerely , Gary Mughm a Directo r Hazardou s Material s an dWast e Managemen t Division
cc : Jaso n King , AG O Dou g Jamison , CDPH E Dan Scheppers , CDPH E
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities         Exchange Act of1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial         conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

Date: August 14,2006

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Mark H. Towe certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Surrey Bancorp; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e) [and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f)] for the registrantand have: 

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared; 

 

b) designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and
### §14601. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14601 was editorially reclassified as section 40301 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 1702.1 Purpose and policy. ( a ) Section 1700.14(a) of part 1700 lists household substances the Consumer Product Safety Commission requires, under section 3(a)(1) of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. 1472, to be contained in special packaging to protect children from serious personal injury or serious illness resulting from handling, using, or ingesting such substances. There may be occasions, however, when the Commission determines that a particular substance should be exempt from special packaging requirements.
( b ) The Commission may, either on its own initiative or upon the petition of any interested person, amend the regulation at § 1700.14(a) by exempting a substance or category of substances from special packaging requirements. The purpose of these rules is to provide procedures and requirements for submitting petitions for exemption from special packaging requirements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar Sheriff, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 141]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Larry Davis, Petitioner, v Joseph T. Smith, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 866]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in an unauthorized exchange of property after a correction officer observed him throw a magazine down the gallery where it *1097was eventually intercepted by another inmate. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier II disciplinary hearing and a penalty of 14 days’ loss of recreation was imposed. On December 14, 2004, the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner was subsequently charged in a second misbehavior report with refusing a direct order and violating facility movement regulations after he refused to come out of his cell for his mandatory law library call out. He was found guilty of these charges following another tier II disciplinary hearing and, on January 11, 2005, this determination was also affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging both determinations.

Since the commencement of this proceeding, the January 11, 2005 determination has been reversed and expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, his challenge to this determination must be dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Larkins v Goord,*24 AD3d 1077, 1078 [2005]). Turning to the determination finding petitioner guilty of engaging in an unauthorized exchange, the misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence supporting this determination *(see Matter of Mendez v Goord,*21 AD3d 1191 [2005]; *Matter of Sanders v Goord,*275 AD2d 842, 843 [2000]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the record does not reveal that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination at issue flowed from any alleged bias *(see Matter of Boatwright v McGinnis,*24 AD3d 1136, 1137 [2005]). Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not excessive and the Hearing Officer properly considered petitioner’s disciplinary record only for the purpose of fashioning it *(see Matter of Johnson v Goord,*7 AD3d 901, 902 [2004]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the December 14, 2004 determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed to that extent. Adjudged that the part of the petition challenging the January 11, 2005 determination is dismissed, as moot, without costs.