alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Subpart 504.1 - Contract Execution

**Parent topic:**Part 504 - Administrative Matters

## 504.101 Contracting officer’s signature.

Contract, contract modifications, blanket purchase agreements, and task and/or delivery orders may be executed manually or electronically using a digital signature. In the absence of the original contracting officer, another contracting officer with appropriate warrant authority may sign. Always type or stamp the name and title of the contracting officer signing the contract on the document, unless it is electronically signed. An electronic contract which includes the name of the contracting officer satisfies the typed, stamped or printed requirement found in FAR 4.101. GSA Order CIO 2162.2, GSA Digital Signature Policy, is the guidance for the use of digital signatures as the preferred means of providing signatures for GSA documents, forms, correspondence, and emails.

## 504.103 [Reserved].
### §13642. Applicability

Except as otherwise provided in subtitles B through F of this title and the amendments made by such subtitles, such subtitles and the amendments made by such subtitles shall apply upon the expiration of the 6-month period beginning on October 28, 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title VI, §684, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subtitles B through F of this title, referred to in text, mean subtitles B to F of title VI of Pub. L. 102–550, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3812–3830, which enacted this chapter, amended sections 1437a, 1437c to 1437g, 1437l, 1437o, 1438, 8011, 8013, and 12705 of this title and section 1701q of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 1437a of this title and section 1701q of Title 12.
October 7, 2016 

The Honorable Dianne Feinstein 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Feinstein: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your 

letter of August 22, 2016, regarding the security of radioactive material licensed by the NRC. 

Specifically, you posed a number of questions and requested that we address the steps and 

schedule for undertaking any future corrective actions necessary to ensure the continuing 

security of such material. 

 Responses to your specific questions are enclosed. However, please note that the NRC 

has two substantial efforts currently underway that, when complete, will provide information that 

will help determine the details of any future steps and enable the scheduling of those activities. 

First, as required by the “Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015,” the 

NRC will be reporting to Congress in December 2016 the results of our program review of 

10 CFR Part 37, “Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive 

Material.” Second, the NRC staff will report to the Commission in 2017 on options to address 

the recommendations made by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in its July 2016 

report, “Nuclear Security: NRC Has Enhanced the Controls of Dangerous Materials, but 

Vulnerabilities Remain.” 

 Please be assured that the NRC takes its obligation to ensure the security of licensed 

radiological material very seriously. The NRC has taken a number of actions to address GAO’s 

recommendations and to continually ensure that the requirements for the protection of 

radioactive material are effective and suitable for the materials being protected. 

 If you need any additional information, please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of 

the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report onForm 10-QSB/A of Little Sioux Corn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for thethree month fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Stephen Roe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Stephen Roe                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen Roe                            |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated:                                 | August 13, 2004 |   |

 

----
No: I-15-004 February 6, 2015

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC To Hold Public Meeting Feb. 19 To Receive Comments 

On Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Report

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting, Feb.19, in 

Brattleboro, Vt., to discuss and receive comments on a report that serves as a roadmap for 

decommissioning activities at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Quality Inn, at 1380 Putney Road in 

Brattleboro.

Vermont Yankee is a 42-year-old boiling-water reactor in Vernon (Windham County), Vt., 

owned by Entergy. It was permanently shut down on Dec. 29, 2014. The company submitted the PostShutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) for the plant to the NRC on Dec. 19, 2014. 

The report describes the company’s plans to move all of the spent nuclear fuel generated over 

the plant’s lifetime into dry cask storage and to put the plant into SAFSTOR, or storage. Eventually, 

plant components will be removed, the site’s nuclear-related buildings will be decontaminated and 

dismantled, and any residual radioactivity at the site will have to be cleaned up to meet allowable 

federal and state limits.

A copy of the PSDAR can be viewed on the NRC’s website.

In addition to the Feb. 19 meeting, the NRC is also accepting written comments on the 

decommissioning report. The deadline for submitting comments is March 23. Written comments can be 

submitted using the Docket ID, NRC-2014-50-271, on the Regulations.Gov website. Comments may 

also be submitted, using the Docket ID, via mail to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 

3WFN-06-A44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.
### §14043h–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043h–3 was editorially reclassified as section 21304 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
_______________________ ______ ________________________________________________ 

### State of Israel Ministry of Transport / Civil Aviation Authorit y

Golan Hous e / Golan st. P.O.B. 1101 / Airport City 70100 / Israel / Tel. +972.3.9774545 / www.caa.gov. il Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Av iation

Office of the Secretary of Aviation and International Affairs

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington DC20590

Subject: Statement of Reciprocity

Dear Mr. Gretch,

The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI) hereby confirm s that the State of Israel, on

the basis of reciprocity, will approve requests from US

- designated airlines to perform

fifth, sixth and seventh freedom AD

- HOC charter operations on the understanding that

the US Government will approve similar requests from Israel

- designated airlines.

CC: Mr. Robert Finnamore

– Acting Division Chief

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transport International Relations & Air Transport Division

No

. 00862615 Phone: 972

. 3

. 9774 025

Date: 1/21/2015 Fax: 972

. 3

. 977 4 59 4

donyehiyai @mot.gov.il



### Respectfully,

Ishay Don Yehiya

Director, International Relations

& Air Transport Division
#### Courtney Paolilli, Appellant, v Steven M. Lynch et al., Respondents.

[819 NYS2d 844]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), entered November 5, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“[T]he standard for determining whether a jury verdict is against the weight of the evidence is whether the evidence so preponderated in favor of the movant that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Harris v Marlow,*18 AD3d 608, 610 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Torres v Esaian, 5*AD3d 670, 671 [2004]). The jury reasonably could have concluded, based upon the evidence presented by the defendants, that the defendant Steven M. Lynch did not deviate from accepted standards of medical care in his performance of abdominoplasty upon the plaintiff *(cf. Lynn G. v Hugo,*96 NY2d 306, 309-310 [2001]). Because that view is based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, the jury may be presumed to have adopted it *(see Harris v Marlow, supra).*Therefore, there is no basis to set aside the verdict, on this appeal, as against the weight of the evidence.

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 204.4 Demand for payment—notice. ( a ) Before offset is made, a written notice will be sent to the debtor. This notice will include: ( 1 ) The type and amount of the debt;
( 2 ) The date when payment is due (not less than thirty days from the date of mailing or hand delivery of the notice);
( 3 ) The agency's intention to collect the debt by administrative offset, including asking the assistance of other Federal agencies to help in the offset whenever possible, if the debtor has not made payment by the payment due date or has not made an arrangement for payment by the payment due date;
( 4 ) The right of the debtor to inspect and copy the Commission's records related to the claim;
( 5 ) The right of the debtor to request a review of the determination of indebtedness and, in the circumstances described in § 204.7, to request an oral hearing from the Commission's designee; and
( 6 ) The right of the debtor to enter into a written agreement with the agency to repay the debt in some other way.
( b ) Claims for payment of travel advances and employee training expenses require notification prior to administrative offset as described in this section. Because no oral hearing is required, notice of the right to a hearing need not be included in the notification.
[58 FR 64370, Dec. 7, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54130, Oct. 26, 2001]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report of OneCap, on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vincent W. Hesser, Chief Executive
Officer, and Tammy Hardcastle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                   /s/ Vincent W. Hesser
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Vincent W. Hesser
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  OneCap


                                   /s/ Tammy Hardcastle
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Tammy Hardcastle
                                  Chief Financial Officer



Dated: October 11, 2004
U

. S

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

SUP P L E MENTAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE

TEST PROCEDURE FOR TELEVISION SETS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20 585

April 4, 2013

Room 8E

- 089 Review Center

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss and invite comment

on the proposed test procedure for Television Sets

.

Agenda

9:00

– 9: 30 am Welcome , Introductions, Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

9: 30

– 9 : 45 am Rulemaking History & Timeline

Jeremy Dommu

9 : 45

– 10 : 00 am Summary of SNOPR

Jeremy Dommu

10 : 00

– 11 : 00 am On

- Mode Test w/ A utomatic Brightness Control Enabled

Anthony Rotolo

11:00

– 11:15 am Break

11: 15

– 1 1 : 45 pm Illuminance Values

Anthony Rotolo

1 1:45

– 1 2: 30 pm Definitions

Anthony Rotolo

12:30

– 1 :30 pm Lunch

1:30

– 2:0 0 pm Test Conditions

Kurt Klinke

2:0 0

– 2 : 15 pm Accuracy of Equipment

Kurt Klinke

2:15

– 3: 00 pm Standby

- Active, High and Standby

- Active, Low Mode

Kurt Klinke

3:00

– 3:15 pm Break3 : 15

– 3 : 30 pm Calculation of Annual Energy Consumption

Louis

- Benoit Desroches

3 : 30

– 3 : 4 5 pm Sampling Plan and Rounding Requirement

Louis

- Benoit Desroches

3 : 4 5

– 4: 0 0 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Doug Brookman

At the end of each section, time will be set aside for web participants to ask

questions and/or make statements.

Questions e

- mailed during webinar will be included in the transcript.
No: 15-048 August 6, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to Take Public Comment,

Hold Hearing Aug. 24 on Crow Butte Uranium Recovery Facility

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a hearing 

beginning Aug. 24 in Crawford, Neb., on challenges to the license renewal for Crow Butte Energy 

Resources Inc.’s uranium recovery facility near Crawford. The board is the independent body within 

the NRC that conducts adjudicatory hearings and renders decisions on legal challenges to licensing 

actions. The NRC renewed the facility license in 2014, with an expiration date of Nov. 5, 2024.

Evidence to be presented in the hearing will address nine contentions filed by several local 

residents and the Western Nebraska Resources Council, known as consolidated intervenors, and the 

Oglala Sioux Tribe. The board will hear arguments on four technical contentions and five related to the 

environmental review. The contentions challenge the adequacy of the evaluation and protection of 

historical resources at the site, and the NRC’s analysis of the facility’s impacts on surface water, 

groundwater, and the ecosystem. 

The hearing will run 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Crawford Community Center, 1005 1st St., in 

Crawford, from Aug. 24 until all evidence has been heard. Members of the public and media are 

welcome to observe the evidentiary hearing, but participation will be limited to the parties, lawyers and 

witnesses. Those planning to attend should arrive at least 15 minutes early to allow time for security 

screening, including possible pat-downs and searches of hand-carried items such as briefcases or 

backpacks. No signs or weapons will be permitted in the building.

The board is also asking for written comments from interested members of the public. These 

statements are not testimony or evidence, but may aid the board and the parties in considering the 

issues in the hearing. Written statements should be submitted by Aug. 28. They may be sent by mail to:

Administrative Judge Michael M. Gibson, c/o Nicholas Sciretta and Sachin Desai, Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel, Mail Stop T-3F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 

20555-0001; by fax to 301-415-5599; or by email to nicholas.sciretta@nrc.gov and 

sachin.desai@nrc.gov.

A copy of the written statement should also be sent by mail to: Office of the Secretary, 

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 

20555-0001; by fax to 301-415-1101; or by e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov. 

Documents related to the Crow Butte license renewal application are available on the 

NRC website. Documents regarding this ASLB proceeding are available on the NRC’s Electronic 

Hearing Docket by clicking on the folder entitled “Crow_Butte_Rsrces_40-8943-OLA” on the left side 

of the page. More information about the role of the ASLB in the licensing process is available on the 

NRC website.
No: IV-14-008 April 25, 2014

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

NRC Issues Confirmatory Action Letter to Acuren USA;

Will Conduct Additional Inspection

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter documenting 

actions that Acuren USA has agreed to take before resuming radiography operations at its facility in 

Kenai, Alaska. In addition, the NRC will conduct a follow-up inspection to learn more about a recent 

incident.

The letter formalizes commitments company officials made to the NRC after an unannounced 

inspection of Acuren’s facility in Kenai on April 10. Inspectors walking around the outside of the 

facility observed high readings on their radiation survey meters in an area where there were no 

boundaries or physical controls to prevent entry by the public during radiography operations. The 

company is licensed to use radioactive materials in devices for making images of pipe welds.

An initial dose estimate performed by the inspectors suggests that had a member of the public 

been standing next to the building, they could have been exposed to radiation in excess of NRC annual 

limits (100 millirem) during the time the radiography operations were conducted on that day. In 

addition, the inspectors were concerned that over the course of a year, members of the public who may 

have worked in a nearby office had the potential to receive a dose in excess of NRC annual limits.

“We will be conducting a follow-up inspection to better understand the circumstances that 

contributed to this incident and to evaluate by direct observation the actions Acuren USA has taken to 

ensure public health and safety are adequately protected,” said Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas.

The inspection team will develop a detailed chronology of the event, evaluate the adequacy of 

licensee actions in response to the incident, and assess the factors which may have contributed to the 

event. The team will prepare a written report that will be made publicly available.

Following a conversation with NRC officials, the company has agreed (1) not to resume 

radiography operations at its Kenai facility without NRC approval; (2) to provide the NRC with a 

description of planned actions taken to ensure that future activities will not result in any member of the 

public being exposed to radiation doses in excess of NRC limits at any of its facilities or temporary job 

sites; and (3) to provide the NRC with evaluations necessary to determine whether members of the 

public were exposed in excess of NRC dose limits during past activities.
Page | 2

Issuance of the Confirmatory Action Letter does not preclude the NRC from taking other 

additional actions for any violations of NRC requirements that may be identified.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q for the
    period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    Report), fully complies with the applicable
    requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                        



| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Michael V. Shustek                           
| |                                                  
| | Michael V. Shustek*                              
| | Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,
| | Manager of the Registrant                        





| |                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ John Alderfer                                
| |                                                  
| | John Alderfer*                                   
| | Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,
| | Manager of the Registrant                        








|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|* | Michael V. Shustek and John Alderfer function, respectively, as
    the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
    Financial Officer of the Registrant for purposes of
    18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Subpart 5330.2 — CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS                              **Parent topic:** Part 5330 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration5330.201 Contract requirements.5330.201-5 Waivers       (a)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i). Submit CAS waiver requests through the SCO to the cognizant HCA Workflow for OUSD(A&S)/DPC review no later than 45 days before the anticipated contract award. Waiver requests must include all items listed in FAR 30.201-5(c) and, for exceptional case CAS waivers, also address the items at DFARS PGI 230.201-5, and include the determination required by DFARS 230.201-5(a)(1)(A)(2).         (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5330.202 Disclosure requirements.5330.202-6 Responsibilities       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).