alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14502. Preemption and election of State nonapplicability

#### (a) Preemption

This chapter preempts the laws of any State to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this chapter, except that this chapter shall not preempt any State law that provides additional protection from liability relating to volunteers or to any category of volunteers in the performance of services for a nonprofit organization or governmental entity.

#### (b) Election of State regarding nonapplicability

This chapter shall not apply to any civil action in a State court against a volunteer in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State enacts a statute in accordance with State requirements for enacting legislation—

(1) citing the authority of this subsection;

(2) declaring the election of such State that this chapter shall not apply, as of a date certain, to such civil action in the State; and

(3) containing no other provisions.

(Pub. L. 105–19, §3, June 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 219.)
#### In the Matter of Allan W. Jennings, Jr., Appellant, v Board of Elections of City of New York et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Keysha T. Beasley et al., Respondents, v Allan W. Jennings, Jr., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[819 NYS2d 487]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Allan W Jennings, Jr., as a candidate in the primary election to be held on September 12, 2006, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of State Senator for the 10th Senatorial District, and a related proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate the same designating petition, the appeals are from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 9, 2006, made in proceeding No. 1, (2) a final order of the same court also dated August 9, *2006,*which, upon the decision made in proceeding No. 1, denied the petition to validate and dismissed that proceeding, (3) a decision of the same court dated August 10, 2006, made after a hearing in proceeding No. 2, and (4) a final order of the same court also dated August 10, 2006, which, upon the decision dated August 10, 2006, made in proceeding No. 2, granted the petition to invalidate and invalidated the designating petition.

Ordered that the appeals from the decisions are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision *(see Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp.,*100 AD2d 509 [1984]); and it is further,

Ordered that the final orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant’s petition to validate was insufficiently pleaded as a matter of law. A validating petition must specify the individual determinations of a board of elections that the candidate claims were erroneous, including the signatures that the candidate claims were improperly invalidated *(see Matter of Krueger v Richards,*59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]; *Matter of Green v Mahr,*231 AD2d 480 [1996]). Since the appellant’s validating petition was not sufficiently particularized to give the Supreme Court and the par*487ties notice of which determinations were claimed to be erroneous or which signatures the candidate claimed were improperly-invalidated *(see*CPLR 3013), the validating petition was properly denied by the Supreme Court *(see Matter of Jannaccio v Board of Elections of City of N.Y.,*297 AD2d 355 [2002]; *Matter of Green v Mahr, supra).*

The appellant’s arguments relating to the final order granting the petition to invalidate the designating petition are without merit. Florio, J.P, Krausman, Goldstein, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Examination of Launch Vehicle Loads Reanalysis TechniquesThe typical approach to calculating dynamic launch loads in aerospace applications is coupled loads analysis (CLA). A component mode model of the launch vehicle is coupled with a component mode model of a payload, system modes are calculated, forcing functions are applied, and the dynamic responses are computed. This approach requires the explicit knowledge of the component models for the launch vehicle and payload, as well as the forcing functions. In many situations, the launch vehicle and forcing functions do not change from one analysis to the next only the payload is different. For this type of application, a method called reanalysis was developed to compute the response of a modified payload on the same launch vehicle. If the launch forcing functions are also the same, the approach eliminates the need for the launch vehicle model and the forcing functions and dramatically reduces the computation time. This work investigates the application and accuracy of three previously developed reanalysis methods using a typical launch vehicle and two different payloads. All three methods are based on knowledge of system modes from the original CLA, and Hurty/Craig-Bampton (HCB) models of the original and new payloads. The first method was developed at JPL (Jet Propulsion Lab) and is often referred to as substitution. It is a frequency-domain method, which requires transformation of time signals to and from the frequency domain. The other two methods are time-domain methods that more closely mimic the CLA process. The three methods were applied to two simple examples and a more complex one. The results indicate that the time-domain methods are considerably more robust with respect to modal truncation and other numerical errors than the frequency-domain JPL method.Document ID20180007518Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKammer, Daniel C.*(ATA Engineering, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)*Blelloch, Paul A.*(ATA Engineering, Inc. San Diego, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 6, 2018Publication DateSeptember 1, 2018Subject CategoryGround Support Systems And Facilities (Space)Report/Patent NumberNF1676L-31346NASA/CR-2018-220091Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 869021.03.07.01.05CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL12AA09CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsReanalysisSubstitution AnalysisSpacecraft LoadsCoupled Loads AnalysisAvailable DownloadsNameType20180007518.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SRM-SECY-15-0146: Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Amendments Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Severe Accident Evaluations (PRM-50-108; NRC-2014-0171)

Accession Number: ML16096A192

Date Released: Monday, May 16, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16096A197 - SRM-SECY-15-0146: Denial of Petition for Rulemaking Requesting Amendments Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Severe Accident Evaluations (PRM-50-108; NRC-2014-0171) (1 page(s), 4/4/2016)
    - ML16096A201 - SRM-SECY-15-0146:  Fuel-Cladding issues in Postulated - Petition for rulemaking; denial (encl. 1) (22 page(s), 4/4/2016)
    - ML16096A203 - SRM-SECY-15-0146:  Letter to Mr. Mark Edward Leyse from Annette Vietti-Cook (encl. 2) (1 page(s), 4/4/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-1999-6439, Notice No. 10]
RIN 2130-AA71


Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA announces that information on whether existing whistle ban 
jurisdictions may qualify as Pre-Rule Quiet Zones under the Interim 
Final Rule on the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade 
Crossings has been placed in the public docket of this proceeding and 
also placed on FRA's Web site.

ADDRESSES: The document entitled ``Status of Existing Whistle Bans 
under the Train Horn Rule'' is available in DOT's Docket Management 
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-001. It is also 
available on the Docket Management Facility's Internet site at http://dms.dot.gov and on FRA's web site at http://www.fra.dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 18, 2003, FRA published in the 
Federal Register (68 FR 70586) an interim final rule requiring that a 
locomotive horn be sounded while a train is approaching and entering a 
public highway-rail crossing. The rules also provide for an exception 
to the above requirement in circumstances in which there is not a 
significant risk of loss of life or serious personal injury, use of the 
locomotive horn is impractical, or safety measures fully compensate for 
the absence of the warning provided by the horn.
    FRA has placed in the public docket (Docket No. FRA-1999-6439, 
Document No. 2509) and on FRA's Web site (http://www.fra.dot.gov), a 
document entitled ``Status of Existing Whistle Bans under the Train 
Horn Rule.'' This document provides FRA's best estimate at the present 
time as to whether specific existing whistle ban jurisdictions may 
qualify as Pre-Rule Quiet Zones under the Interim Final Rule without 
taking additional steps to reduce risk.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Ries, Office of Safety, FRA, 1120 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: 202-493-6299); or 
Kathryn Shelton, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1120 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: 202-493-6038).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 3, 2004.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 04-2636 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3739 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 

terminate payments to States certified under that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2011 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to terminate payments to States certified under 

that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF PAYMENTS TO STATES CER4 TIFIED UNDER SURFACE MINING CONTROL 

5 AND RECLAMATION ACT 0F 1977. 

6 (a) TERMINATION OF PAYMENTS.—Section 

7 411(h)(2) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 

8 Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(2)) is amended to read 

9 as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3739 IH

1 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—No payment shall be made 

2 under this subsection to a State or Indian tribe for 

3 which a certification is made under subsection (a) in 

4 which the Secretary concurs.’’. 

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such Act is fur6 ther amended— 

7 (1) in section 402(i)(2) (30 U.S.C. 1232(i)(2)), 

8 by striking ‘‘paragraphs (1)(A) and (2)(A)’’ and in9 serting ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’; and 

10 (2) by amending section 411(h)(1)(D) (30 

11 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)) to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘(D) USE OF FUNDS.—A State or Indian 

13 tribe shall use any amounts provided under this 

14 paragraph for the purposes described in section 

15 403.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3906 

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to allow recreational 

fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island Sound transit zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act to 

allow recreational fishing for Atlantic Striped Bass in 

the Block Island Sound transit zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL FISHING FOR ATLANTIC 

4 STRIPED BASS IN THE BLOCK ISLAND SOUND 

5 TRANSIT ZONE. 

6 Section 9 of the Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation 

7 Act (16 U.S.C. 5158) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(d) RECREATIONAL FISHING IN BLOCK ISLAND

10 SOUND TRANSIT ZONE.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3906 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), the Secretary shall not prohibit fishing 

3 for Atlantic Striped Bass in the Block Island Sound 

4 transit zone. 

5 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—This subsection does not 

6 limit the authority of the Secretary to establish sea7 sonal or other temporary limitations on fishing that 

8 are specifically necessary for the conservation and 

9 management of Atlantic striped bass. 

10 ‘‘(3) BLOCK ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE DE11 FINED.—In this subsection the term ‘Block Island 

12 Sound transit zone’ means the area of the exclusive 

13 economic zone within Block Island Sound, north of 

14 a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk Point, 

15 New York, and Block Island Southeast Light, Block 

16 Island, Rhode Island; and west of a line connecting 

17 Point Judith Light, Point Judith, Rhode Island, and 

18 Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, Rhode 

19 Island.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Subpart 5349.1 – GENERAL PRINCIPLES                    **Parent topic:** Part 5349 – Termination of Contracts5349.101 Authorities and Responsibilities       (b) The SCO or command-appointed termination contracting officer (TCO) must approve a termination for default or cause prior to a contracting officer taking the action. When requesting approval, the contracting officer must provide all relevant documents to include a chronology of key events, cure/show cause notices and responses thereto.5349.102  Notification of Termination       See the tailorable Termination Authority template.
### §1320f–4. Publication of maximum fair prices

#### (a) In general

With respect to an initial price applicability year and a selected drug with respect to such year—

(1) not later than November 30 of the year that is 2 years prior to such initial price applicability year, the Secretary shall publish the maximum fair price for such drug negotiated with the manufacturer of such drug under this part; and

(2) not later than March 1 of the year prior to such initial price applicability year, the Secretary shall publish, subject to section 1320f–2(c) of this title, the explanation for the maximum fair price with respect to the factors as applied under section 1320f–3(e) of this title for such drug described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Updates

#### (1) Subsequent year maximum fair prices

For a selected drug, for each year subsequent to the first initial price applicability year of the price applicability period with respect to such drug, with respect to which an agreement for such drug is in effect under section 1320f–2 of this title, not later than November 30 of the year that is 2 years prior to such subsequent year, the Secretary shall publish the maximum fair price applicable to such drug and year, which shall be—

(A) subject to subparagraph (B), the amount equal to the maximum fair price published for such drug for the previous year, increased by the annual percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (all items; United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with the July immediately preceding such November 30; or

(B) in the case the maximum fair price for such drug was renegotiated, for the first year for which such price as so renegotiated applies, such renegotiated maximum fair price.

#### (2) Prices negotiated after deadline

In the case of a selected drug with respect to an initial price applicability year for which the maximum fair price is determined under this part after the date of publication under this section, the Secretary shall publish such maximum fair price by not later than 30 days after the date such maximum price is so determined.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XI, §1195, as added Pub. L. 117–169, title I, §11001(a), Aug. 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1849.)
No. 03

- 14 -00552- CV

I N THE T HIRD C OURT OF A PPEALS A USTIN , T EXAS

R AGHUNATH D ASS , P.E.,

Appellant ,

V

.

T EXAS B OARD OF P ROFESSIONAL E NGINEERS , Appellee.

On Appeal from the 201st Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas

N OTICE OF A PPEARANCE OF A DDITIONAL C OUNSEL

Appellant Raghunath Dass, P.E. “Appellant” files this Notice of Appearance

of Additional Counsel. J. Woodfin Jones (State Bar No. 10911700 ) of Alexander

Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP, 515 Congress Avenue, Suite 2350, Austin,

Texas 78701-3562; Telephone: (512) 482-9300; Facsimile: (512) 482-9303, will

appear as additional counsel of record for Appellant in the above-referenced cause

of action. ACCEPTED 03-14-00552-CV 4198563 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/18/2015 3:31:30 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2

A ppellant requests that the clerk take notice of this designation and provide

a copy of all communications to M r

. Jones

. Jimmy Alan Hall will continue to

serve as lead counsel for Appellant

.
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ J. Woodfin Jones J. Woodfin J ones State Bar No. 10911700 wjones@adjtlaw.com A LEXANDER D UBOSE J EFFERSON & T OWNSEND LLP 515 Congress Avenue Suite 2350 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 482

- 9300 Facsimile : (512) 482

- 9303

Jimmy Alan Hall State Bar No. 08759800 jahall@fbjah.com J IMMY A LAN H ALL , PLLC 4600 Mueller Boulevard, Suite 2121 Austin, Texas 78723 Telephone: (512) 722

- 3190 Facsimile: (512) 857

- 9195

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLANT R AGHUNATH D ASS , P.E.3 C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was electronically filed with the Clerk

of the Court using the electronic case filing system of the Court. I also certify that

a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via e

- filing on the following

counsel of record on February 18, 2015 :

Jennifer L. Hopgood State Bar No. 24073010 jennifer.hopgood@texasattorneygeneral.gov Assistant Attorney General Administrative Law Division O FFICE OF THE A TTORNEY G ENERAL P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711

- 2 548 Telephone: (512) 936

- 1660 Facsimile: (512) 320

- 0167

Counsel for Appellee Texas Board of Professional Engineer s

/s/ J. Woodfin Jones J. Woodfin Jones
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents Baffle Former Bolt July 19, 2016 Meeting. Accession Number: ML16208A001 Date Released: Monday, March 13, 2017 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML16202A073 - Industry Baffle-Former Bolt Focus Group NRC Update - Charter and Objectives. (13 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16202A076 - Industry Baffle-Former Bolt Focus Group NRC Update. (15 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16202A063 - Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC., Baffle-Former Bolt NSAL-16-1. (11 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16202A072 - Areva Baffle-to-Former Bolt Customer Service Bulletin No. 16-02. (8 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16203A025 - 1- Baffle-Former Bolt Overview of Industry Experience. (20 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16203A029 - Baffle-Former Bolts Public Meeting July 19 NRC Slides. (6 page(s), 7/19/2016)
            ML16166A005 - 07/19/2016 - Meeting Agenda - Meeting on Baffle-Former-Bolts and MRP-227-A. (1 page(s), 6/21/2016)
            ML16208A039 - 07/19/2016 - Meeting Summary with Electric Power Research Institute on Materials Reliability Program-227-A, "Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluation Guidelines." (4 page(s), 9/7/2016)
            ML16215A061 - Email and PA-MSC-1473 Service Bulletin for 07/19/2016 Baffle Bolt Meeting. (6 page(s), 7/18/2016)
            ML16211A054 - Electric Power Research Institute - Transmittal of NEI-03-08 Interim Guidance Regarding Baffle Former Bolt Inspections for Tier 1 Plants as Defined in Westinghouse NSAL 16-01. (3 page(s), 7/27/2016)
            ML16222A513 - Nuclear Safety Advisory Letter NSAL-16-1, Revision 1. (13 page(s), 8/9/2016)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
§ 424.2 Defenses. No violation of § 424.1 shall be found if: ( a ) The advertised products were ordered in adequate time for delivery in quantities sufficient to meet reasonably anticipated demand;
( b ) The food retailer offers a “raincheck” for the advertised products;
( c ) The food retailer offers at the advertised price or at a comparable price reduction a similar product that is at least comparable in value to the advertised product; or
( d ) The food retailer offers other compensation at least equal to the advertised value.
[54 FR 35467, Aug. 28, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 70056, Nov. 25, 2014]
#### § 144.6 Fees.

The provisions of § 145.8 of these regulations with respect to fees for production of documents pursuant to the FOIA are applicable to this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3640 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3640

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire not more than 18 
 acres of land and interests in land in Mariposa, California, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2011

 Mr. Denham (for himself and Mr. Farr) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire not more than 18 
 acres of land and interests in land in Mariposa, California, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK LAND ACQUISITION.

    (a) Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior may acquire not 
more than 18 acres of land and interests in land near the junction of 
highways CA-49 and CA-140 in Mariposa, California.
    (b) Prohibition on Acquisition by Eminent Domain.--The Secretary 
may not acquire property under this section by eminent domain.
    (c) Planning and Administration.--The Secretary--
            (1) shall administer land or interests in land acquired 
        under this section as part of Yosemite National Park in 
        accordance with applicable laws and regulations; and
            (2) may partner with Mariposa County regarding land use 
        planning related to land and interests in land acquired under 
        this section.
                                 <all>
```
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0750**