alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1593e. Housing of persons displaced by acquisition of property for defense installations or industries

Upon a finding by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development that the acquisition of any real property for a defense installation or industry has resulted, or will result, in the displacement of persons from their homes on such property, he may (notwithstanding any other provision of this or any other law) issue regulations pursuant to which such persons may be permitted to occupy or purchase housing for which credit restrictions established pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 [50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.] have been relaxed or housing which has been provided or assisted under the provisions of this Act (including amendments to other Acts provided herein), subject to any conditions or requirements that he determines necessary for purposes of national defense.

(Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, title VI, §611, 65 Stat. 316; Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Defense Production Act of 1950, referred to in text, is act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798, which is classified to chapter 55 (§4501 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

This Act and herein, referred to in text, mean act Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 378, 65 Stat. 293, known as the Defense Housing and Community Facilities and Services Act of 1951. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1951 Amendment note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see note set out under section 1581 of this title.
#### Alexander Shkolnik, Respondent, v Igor Krutoy et al., Defendants, and Romaro Corp. et al., Appellants.

[819 NYS2d 839]

*537In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants Romaro Corp., Zaliv Realty Corp., Aron Grinshpun, Zelig Zelster, and Sam Zelster appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated April 4, 2005, which denied their motion to vacate a notice of pendency filed by the plaintiff, and (2) an order of the same court dated July 8, 2005, which denied their motion, inter aha, for leave to reargue and/or renew their prior motion.

Ordered that the order dated April 4, 2005 is reversed, on the law, and the motion to vacate the notice of pendency is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 8, 2005 is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the Kings County Clerk is directed to cancel the notice of pendency dated November 15, 2004 indexed against Block 8815, Lot 16; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

A notice of pendency may be filed in any action “in which the judgment demanded would affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property” (CPLR 6501). However, because of “the powerful impact that this device has on the alienability of property,” together with “the facility with which it may be obtained,” the courts have applied a narrow interpretation in reviewing whether an action is one affecting the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property *(5303 Realty Corp. v O & Y Equity Corp.,*64 NY2d 313, 315-316, 321 [1984]; *see Rajic v Sarokin,*214 AD2d 663, 664 [1995]; *Tsiporin v Ziegel,*203 AD2d 451, 452 [1994]).

The complaint here seeks only monetary damages and an accounting to determine the amount of such damages. Accordingly, since a judgment for the plaintiff would not affect “the title to, or the use, possession, or enjoyment of, real property,” the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion to vacate the notice of pendency *(see Ali v Ahmad,*24 AD3d 475 [2005]; *Distinctive Custom Homes Bldg. Corp. v Esteves,*12 AD3d 559 [2004]; *Rajic v Sarokin, supra*at 663; *Tsiporin v Ziegel, supra*at 452; *Interior Design Force v Dorfman,*151 AD2d 461, 462 [1989]; *cf. Keen v Keen,*140 AD2d 311, 312 [1988]).

The appeal from so much of the order dated July 8, 2005 as denied reargument must be dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. The appeal from so much of the order dated July 8, 2005 as denied renewal has been rendered academic in light of our determination of the ap*538peal from the order dated April 4, 2005. Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
5345.302 Contracts with Foreign

Governments or International Organizations

See AFI 63-101/20-101, Integrated Life Cycle Management.

Parent topic: Subpart 5345.3 – PROVIDING GOVERNMENT PROPERTY TO CONTRACTORS
̄

012

Miles

This product was produced from geospatial information prepared by

the USDA Forest Service. Source map scales vary and accuracy of

this product has not been assessed. Using GIS product for purposes

other than those for which they were created my yield inaccurate or

misleading results.

Disclaimer

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004

Land Site Type

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between Lakes The NORTH

Legend

Site Type

Xeric

Dry

Dry-Mesic

Mesic

Alluvial

Other Features

Major Rivers and Lakes

Road Level

1

2

3

4

5
### §17614. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 17614 was editorially reclassified as section 21114 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 204.38 Pre-offset hearing. ( a ) The hearing official shall determine the form and content of hearings granted under this section, pursuant to 31 CFR 901.3(e). All oral hearings shall be on the record. Except as otherwise ordered by the hearing official, hearings shall be recorded or transcribed verbatim by shorthand, mechanical means, electronic sound recording, or any other method, subject to the discretion and approval of the hearing official, and a transcript thereof shall be made.
( b ) Oral hearings are informal in nature. The Commission, represented by an attorney from the Office of General Counsel, and accompanied by a program official and the employee, and/or the employee's representative, orally shall explain their respective positions using relevant documentation. The employee may testify on his or her own behalf, subject to cross examination. Other witnesses may be called to testify where the hearing official determines the testimony to be relevant and not redundant. The Federal Rules of Evidence serve as a guideline, but are not controlling. The employee bears the burdens of proof and persuasion.
( c ) The hearing official shall: ( 1 ) Conduct a fair and impartial hearing;
( 2 ) Preside over the course of the hearing, maintain decorum and avoid delay in the disposition of the hearing; and
( 3 ) Issue a decision in accordance with § 204.39, Written decision, on the basis of the oral hearing and the written record.
( d ) Oral hearings are normally open to the public. However, the hearing official may close all or any portion of the hearing at either the request of either party or upon the hearing official's initiative when doing so is in the best interest[s] of the employee or the public.
( e ) Oral hearings may be conducted by conference call at the request of the employee or at the discretion of the hearing official.
( f ) *Pre-offset “paper” hearing.* If a hearing is to be held only upon written submissions, the hearing official shall issue a decision based solely upon the written record.
[58 FR 38520, July 19, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54132, Oct. 26, 2001]
§ 20.3 Clearing organizations. ( a ) *Reporting data records.* For each reporting day, with respect to paired swaps or swaptions, clearing organizations shall report to the Commission, separately for each clearing member's proprietary and clearing member customer account, unique groupings of the data elements in paragraph (b) of this section (to the extent that there are such corresponding elements), in a single data record, so that each reported record is distinguishable from every other reported record (because of differing data values, as opposed to the arrangement of the elements).
( b ) *Populating reported data records with data elements.* Data records reported under paragraph (a) of this section shall include the following data elements: ( 1 ) An identifier assigned by the Commission to the clearing organization;
( 2 ) The identifier assigned by the clearing organization to the clearing member;
( 3 ) The identifier assigned by the clearing organization for a cleared product;
( 4 ) The reporting day;
( 5 ) A proprietary or clearing member customer account indicator;
( 6 ) The futures equivalent month;
( 7 ) The commodity reference price;
( 8 ) Gross long swap positions;
( 9 ) Gross short swap positions;
( 10 ) A swaption put or call side indicator;
( 11 ) A swaption expiration date;
( 12 ) A swaption strike price;
( 13 ) Gross long non-delta-adjusted swaption positions; and
( 14 ) Gross short non-delta-adjusted swaption positions.
( c ) *End of reporting day data.* For all futures equivalent months, clearing organizations shall report end of reporting day settlement prices for each cleared product and deltas for every unique swaption put and call, expiration date, and strike price.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

December 15, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M161215A 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:25 A.M., 

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-16-0119 – FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. (TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR 

GENERATING UNITS 3 AND 4), INTERVENOR’S APPEAL OF LBP-16-8 

The Commission, with Commissioner Baran dissenting, approved a Memorandum and Order 

addressing the petition for review of Citizens Allied for Safe Energy (CASE) on the Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board’s ruling on the merits of Contention 1 in this license amendment 

matter. The Memorandum and Order denies CASE’s petition for review. 

(Subsequently, on December 15, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

II. SECY-16-0130 – DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC (WILLIAM STATES LEE III 

NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2) MANDATORY HEARING DECISION 

The Commission approved a Memorandum and Order addressing the required findings of 10 

C.F.R. §§ 52.97(a) and 51.107(a) and the issues discussed at the uncontested hearing on 

October 5, 2016, concerning the application of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC to construct and 

operate two AP1000 reactors at the William States Lee III Nuclear Station site in Cherokee 

County, South Carolina. The Memorandum and Order authorizes issuance of the combined 

licenses and approves the location of the Lee Emergency Operations Facility. 

(Subsequently, on December 15, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
### §15329. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15329 was editorially reclassified as section 20929 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### §16. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, which was from the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1950, act Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 680, title I, 63 Stat. 791, was not repeated in the General Appropriation Act, 1951, act Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, 64 Stat. 595. It related to detail of Public Health medical officers to the Bureau of Mines. For provisions for details to executive departments, see section 215 of this title.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior acts:

June 29, 1948, ch. 754, 62 Stat. 1139.

July 25, 1947, ch. 337, 61 Stat. 483.

July 1, 1946, ch. 529, 60 Stat. 375.

July 3, 1945, ch. 262, 59 Stat. 351.

June 28, 1944, ch. 298, 58 Stat. 499.

July 12, 1943, ch. 219, 57 Stat. 485.

July 2, 1942, ch. 473, 56 Stat. 548.

June 28, 1941, ch. 259, 55 Stat. 345.

June 18, 1940, ch. 395, 54 Stat. 444.

May 10, 1939, ch. 119, 53 Stat. 725.

May 9, 1938, ch. 187, 52 Stat. 330.

Aug. 9, 1937, ch. 570, 50 Stat. 602.

June 22, 1936, ch. 691, 49 Stat. 1791.

May 9, 1935, ch. 101, 49 Stat. 205.

Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 104, title III, 48 Stat. 564.

Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 144, title III, 47 Stat. 1406.

July 1, 1932, ch. 361, title III, 47 Stat. 516.

Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 280, title III, 46 Stat. 1349.

Apr. 18, 1930, ch. 184, title III, 46 Stat. 212.

Jan. 25, 1929, ch. 102, title III, 45 Stat. 1133.

Feb. 15, 1928, ch. 57, title III, 45 Stat. 103.

Feb. 24, 1927, ch. 189, title III, 44 Stat. 1219.

Apr. 29, 1926, ch. 195, title III, 44 Stat. 368.

Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1210.

Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, 41 Stat. 1401.

June 5, 1920, ch. 235, 41 Stat. 911.

July 19, 1919, ch. 24, 41 Stat. 199.

July 1, 1918, ch. 113, 40 Stat. 671.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, 58 Stat. 714, as renumbered by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936, repealed portions of Appropriations Acts June 12, 1917, ch. 27, §1, 40 Stat. 146; May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 588; Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1210; June 5, 1924, ch. 264, 43 Stat. 422; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1175, which contained similar provisions to those of this section, but later appropriation acts containing such provisions were not repealed.
# MP5315.3 Source Selection

**Parent topic:**MP5315 - Contracting by Negotiation

## 1 PURPOSE, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

## 2 PRE-SOLICITATION ACTIVITIES

## 3 EVALUATION AND DECISION PROCESS

## 4 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

## 5 DEFINITIONS ( No DAF Text)

## 6 MANDATORY AIR FORCE SOURCE SELECTION TRAINING

## LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES (No DAF text)
### §15841. Energy-efficient appliances

In purchasing appliances, a public housing agency shall purchase energy-efficient appliances that are Energy Star products or FEMP-designated products, as such terms are defined in section 8259b of this title, unless the purchase of energy-efficient appliances is not cost-effective to the agency.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title I, §152, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 649.)
Part 5327 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights

DAFFARS PART 5327 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5327.2 – PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS

5327.201-2 Contract Clauses

Subpart 5327.3 – PATENT RIGHTS UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

5327.303 Contract Clauses

5327.306 Licensing background patent rights to third parties

Subpart 5327.90 – FOREIGN DISCLOSURE

5327.9000 Foreign Disclosure Policy

Subpart 5327.2 – PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS

5327.201-2 Contract Clauses

(e) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5327.3 – PATENT RIGHTS UNDER GOVERNMENT

CONTRACTS

5327.303 Contract Clauses

(b)(1) When using FAR clause 52.227-11, insert instructions substantially the same as the following

in the fill-in of section (j):

(1) “Interim or final Invention Reports shall be sent to both the Administrative Contracting Officer,

(insert “at the address located on the face of the contract” or name and address for the ACO)

an(b)(1) When using FAR clause 52.227-11, insert instructions substantially the same as the

following in the fill-in of section (j):

d to (insert contact information, name/or position title, email, and phone number for person(s) at the

procuring contract office who will perform patent administration for this contract) within the

timeframes specified in the Patent Rights clause of this contract.

(2) The DD Form 882, Report of Inventions and Subcontracts, may be used to submit these reports.

The DD Form 882 may be also be used for the notification of an award of any subcontract(s) for
experimental, developmental or research work which contain a Patent Rights clause.

(3) All other notifications required pursuant to this clause shall be sent to the addresses in

paragraph 1 and to (insert contact information for person(s) at the procuring contract office who will

handle patent administration, e.g., name and/or position, email, phone numbers)

5327.306 Licensing background patent rights to third parties

(a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5327.90 – FOREIGN DISCLOSURE

5327.9000 Foreign Disclosure Policy

For Foreign Disclosure issues, Government personnel should refer to National Disclosure Policy

(NDP-1), DAFI 16-201 and AFPD 16-2, Disclosure of Military Information to Foreign Governments

and International Organizations and follow all procedures including foreign disclosure reviews.
#### City of Chicago, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles *A.*Selleck, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 20,007.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the April term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 26, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

This case was consolidated for hearing with the case of *City of Chicago v. Allen,*reported on p. 189 *ante,*and the decision in that case held controlling in this.

William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for plaintiff in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel.

Francis E. Croarkin, for defendant in error; Francis W. Walker, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §16294. Research and development for coal mining technologies

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall carry out a program for research and development on coal mining technologies.

#### (b) Cooperation

In carrying out the program, the Secretary shall cooperate with appropriate Federal agencies, coal producers, trade associations, equipment manufacturers, institutions of higher education with mining engineering departments, and other relevant entities.

#### (c) Program

The research and development activities carried out under this section shall—

(1) be guided by the mining research and development priorities identified by the Mining Industry of the Future Program and in the recommendations from relevant reports of the National Academy of Sciences on mining technologies;

(2) include activities exploring minimization of contaminants in mined coal that contribute to environmental concerns including development and demonstration of electromagnetic wave imaging ahead of mining operations;

(3) develop and demonstrate coal bed electromagnetic wave imaging, spectroscopic reservoir analysis technology, and techniques for horizontal drilling in order to—

(A) identify areas of high coal gas content;

(B) increase methane recovery efficiency;

(C) prevent spoilage of domestic coal reserves; and

(D) minimize water disposal associated with methane extraction; and

(4) expand mining research capabilities at institutions of higher education.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §964, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 892.)
#### § 306.4 Preemption.

The Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”), 15 U.S.C. 2801 *et seq.,* as amended, is the law that directs the FTC to enact this rule. Section 204 of PMPA, 15 U.S.C. 2824, provides:

(a) To the extent that any provision of this title applies to any act or omission, no State or any political subdivision thereof may adopt or continue in effect, except as provided in subsection (b), any provision of law or regulation with respect to such act or omission, unless such provision of such law or regulation is the same as the applicable provision of this title.

(b) A State or political subdivision thereof may provide for any investigative or enforcement action, remedy, or penalty (including procedural actions necessary to carry out such investigative or enforcement actions, remedies, or penalties) with respect to any provision of law or regulation permitted by subsection (a).

[58 FR 41373, Aug. 3, 1993]
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Larry W. Denney, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and Ihave:
(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation;and
(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 20, 2005 /s/ Larry W. Denney    Name: Larry W. Denney Title: Chairman, President and Chief   Executive Officer   (principal executive officer)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT LEE STUNZIG, SR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-3296

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 4, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Lindsay D. Turner, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.