alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 10.112 Administration of restitution.

Based on the recommendations submitted pursuant to § 10.111, the Commission or the Administrative Law Judge, as applicable, shall establish in writing a procedure for identifying and notifying individual persons who may be entitled to restitution, receiving and evaluating claims, obtaining funds to be paid as restitution from the party and distributing such funds to qualified claimants. As necessary or appropriate, the Commission or the Administrative Law Judge may appoint any person, including an employee of the Commission, to administer, or assist in administering, such restitution procedure. Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, all costs incurred in administering an order of restitution shall be paid from the restitution funds obtained from the party who was so sanctioned; provided, however, that if the administrator is a Commission employee, no fee shall be charged for his or her services or for services performed by any other Commission employee working under his or her direction.
Exhibit
32.0
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the report of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13(a)-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the
undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify that, to the best of
such officer’s knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 The
undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 14th day of November
2008.
 
 
 /s/ Chang H. AhnChang
      H. AhnChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Ted T.H. JeongTed
      T.H. JeongChief
      Financial Officer
### §13971. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13971 was editorially reclassified as section 12341 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### In the Matter of Elvin Lebron, Appellant, v Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 470]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 27, 2006, in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as untimely.

Petitioner is serving an aggregate sentence of 22 years in prison for his convictions of manslaughter in the first degree and robbery in the first degree. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination denying his request for parole release but, upon objection by respondent, the petition was dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. This appeal by petitioner ensued.

Respondent now withdraws its timeliness objection based upon record evidence that the petition and supporting papers were received by the Albany County Clerk within the four-month limitations period *(see*CPLR 217; *Matter of Grant v Senkowski,*95 NY2d 605, 610 [2001]). Because respondent has not yet answered the petition in this matter, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 30 days of the date of this Court’s decision *(see Matter of Arosena v New York State Div. of Parole,*12 AD3d 1019, 1019 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 30 days of the date of this Court’s decision.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Medallion Crest
Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July
31, 2004 (the "Report"),

I, Sean Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



/s/ SEAN MILLER
-----------------------
Sean Miller
Chief Executive Officer
September 20, 2004
### §10343. Goals of research program

The goals of the research program established under section 10342 of this title shall be—

(1) the development of membranes resistant to degradation, bacterial or otherwise, thereby extending the life of such membranes;

(2) the development of membranes useful for the efficient and cost effective treatment of contaminated water; and

(3) the development of innovative technologies for membrane processes.

(Pub. L. 102–490, §4, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3142.)
#### In the Matter of Joseph E. MacFarland, Respondent, against Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.

*588Claimant failed to show that the injuries sustained by him incapacitated him physically or mentally so as to prevent the service of a notice of claim by him or by someone on his behalf within the required time. *(Matter of Johnson*v. *City of New York,*278 App. Div. 945; *Matter of Sullivan*v. *Town of Babylon,*277 App. Div. 791, affd. 302 N. Y. 609; *Matter of Donovan*v. *Board of Educ. of Peekskill Union Free School Dist.,*277 App. Div. 904, affd. 301 N. Y. 739; *Matter of Haas*V. *Incorporated Vil. of Gedarhurst,*272 App. Div. 1031, affd. 298 N. Y. 757.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Spectrum Sciences & Software HoldingsCorp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the issuer and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Michael M. Megless       Michael M. MeglessChief Financial OfficerSpectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp.Date:December 23, 2005
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 24

- 00006

- CR

ERIC MONTREAL ANDERSON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 2330084

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION Eric Montreal Anderson pled not guilty to and was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon

. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 46.04 (Supp.) . After a trial on punishment, a Hopkins County jury assessed a sentence of ten years’ imprisonment. The trial court also ordered Anderson to pay $75.00 in reimbursement fees, and the bill of costs included a $15.00 time payment fee. On appeal, Anderson argues that the trial court erred by including duplicative reimbursement fees and by including a time payment fee in the bill of costs. 1 We addressed the issues raised by Anderson in detail in our opinion in cause number 06

- 24

- 00002

- CR. For the reasons discussed in that opinion, we sustain Anderson’s points of error. 2

1 In companion ca u se number 06

- 24

- 00002

- CR, Anderson appeals a conviction for possession of five pounds or less but more than four ounces of marihuana. He also appeals a conviction for evading arrest in ca u se number 06

- 24

- 00004

- CR and a conviction for possession of four grams or more but less than 200 grams of fentanyl in ca u se number 06

- 24

- 00005

- CR.

2 By separate point of error, Anderson raised a challenge to the order to withdraw funds. As explained by our opinion in cause number 06

- 24

- 00002

- CR, Anderson’s complaint is a civil matter, and we decline to address it in this criminal appeal. See Johnson v. Tenth Jud

. Dist. C t. of Appeals at Waco , 280 S.W.3d 866, 871

– 72 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Harrell v. State , 286 S.W.3d 315, 318

– 19 (Tex. 2009); Perez v. State , 424 S.W.3d 81, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (Alcalá, J., concurring)

.3

We modify the trial court’s judgmen t and bill of costs by deleting the order to pay $ 75 .00 in duplicative reimbursement. We further modify the bill of costs by deleting the time payment fee. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Charles van Cleef Justice Date Submitted: July 30, 2024 Date Decided: September 6, 2024 Do Not Publish
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodgine Thompson, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 796]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J., at request for new counsel; Jeffrey M. Atlas, J., at plea and sentence), rendered April 20, 2004, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree and attempted sodomy in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the voluntariness of his plea are unpreserved since he never moved to withdraw the plea or vacate his conviction *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. We note that defendant’s statements at sentencing did not constitute a plea withdrawal motion; on the contrary, defendant expressed a desire to proceed with sentencing. Were we to review defendant’s claims, we would find them to be without merit. The plea minutes establish that the court conducted a proper allocution and that defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.

The court’s summary denial of defendant’s conclusory application for new counsel was proper, since defendant failed to make any serious complaint requiring further inquiry *(see People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822 [1990]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary, ABRWH, NIOSH, CDC, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, telephone 513/533-6825, fax 513/533-6826. 

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: November 24, 2004. 

B. Kathy Skipper, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 04-26490 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Centennial Specialty Foods Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Douglas L. Evans, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                           | /s/  DOUGLAS L. EVANS    |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                           | Douglas  L. Evans        |
|                           | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                           |                     |
| Dated:  May 16, 2005 |                     |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.30-17 Delegation of authority to Director of Office of International Affairs. Pursuant to the provisions of Pub. L. 100-181, 101 Stat. 1254, 1255 (15 U.S.C. 78d-1, 78d-2), the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby delegates, until the Commission orders otherwise, the following functions to the Director of the Office of International Affairs to be performed by the Director or under the Director's direction by such other person or persons as may be designated from time to time by the Chairman of the Commission: ( a ) To administer the provisions of § 240.24c-1 of this chapter; provided that access to nonpublic information as defined in such section shall be provided only with the concurrence of the head of the Commission division or office responsible for such information or the files containing such information.
( b ) To administer the provisions of section 24(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78x(d)).
[58 FR 52419, Oct. 8, 1993]
### §14102. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–189, §2(b)(1), Oct. 5, 2012, 126 Stat. 1435

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200113, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2057, required the Director to submit an annual report describing participants in and the progress of the Police Corps program.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Electrical Manufacturers Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Electrical 
Manufacturers Association (``NEMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: National 
Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope 
of NEMA's standards development activities are; NEMA administers and 
publishes standards that are related to a spectrum of electrical 
products produced globally, including but not limited to, industrial 
automation equipment including industrial controls and systems, motors, 
and power sources for welding; lighting systems including lamps, 
lighting controls, lamp ballasts, and lighting fixtures (luminaries); 
consumer products including dry batteries, smoke and fire detectors, 
and residential controls; building construction products including 
circuit breakers, receptacles, conduit, outlet boxes, switches, surge 
suppressors, insulating materials, and wire and cable; equipment for 
the electric utility industry; and medical imaging equipment including 
CT, Ultrasound, X-ray, and MRI. NEMA also serves as Secretariat for 
DICOM (Digital Communications in Medicine) Standards Committee; certain 
ANSI Accredited Standards Committees (``ASC''); and certain technical 
committees of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). NEMA 
also publishes the standards developed by itself and by DICOM and ASC.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25842 Filed 11-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### John H. Henderson, Respondent, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT RULES 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)

I,
Melvin L. Flanigan, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: August 8, 2008By:

/s/MELVIN L. FLANIGANMelvin L. Flanigan Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BRUCE CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-941, CA-96-2185-6) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In light of this disposition, Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal is hereby denied. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Campbell, Nos. CR-94-941; CA-96-2185-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 1997). * We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 305.9 Duty to provide labels on websites.

For each covered product required by this part to bear an EnergyGuide or Lighting Facts label, the manufacturer must make a copy of the label available on a publicly accessible website in a manner that allows catalog sellers to hyperlink to the label or download it for use in websites or paper catalogs. The label for each specific model must remain on the website for six months after production of that model ceases.

[84 FR 58032, Oct. 30, 2019]