alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[104th Congress Public Law 311]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ311.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 3818]]

Public Law 104-311
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Wekiva River, 
 Seminole Creek, and Rock Springs Run in the State of Florida for study 
     and potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 
             System. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 1996 -  [H.R. 3155]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) Wekiva River, Florida.--(A) The entire river.
    ``(B) The Seminole Creek tributary.
    ``(C) The Rock Springs Run tributary.''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT.

    Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( ) The study of the Wekiva River and the tributaries 
designated in paragraph ( ) of subsection (a) shall be completed and the 
report transmitted to Congress not later than two years after the date 
of the enactment of this paragraph.''.

    Approved October 19, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3155:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-824 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2



                        Report of Independent Accountants


November 28, 2000

To the Board of Directors
of Oakwood Acceptance Corporation


We have examined management's assertion about Oakwood Acceptance Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2000
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures, as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


<PAGE>




November 28, 2000

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
101 Centre Port Dr., Suite 250
Greensboro, NC 27409

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended September 30, 2000, Oakwood Acceptance Corporation
(the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP).

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amount of $5,500,000 each.

/s/  Duane D. Daggett                       /s/  Robert A. Smith
Duane D. Daggett                            Robert A. Smith
President                                   Executive Vice President


/s/  Jimmy S. Griffin                       /s/  Suzanne H. Wood
Jimmy S. Griffin                            Suzanne H. Wood
Senior Vice President                       Vice President


/s/  Derek M. Surette                       /s/  Michael D. Rutherford
Derek M. Surette                            Michael D. Rutherford
Vice President                              Executive Vice President
### SUBCHAPTER IX—ATOMIC ENERGY LICENSES
#### § 802.53 Certain foreign banking transactions.

An acquisition which requires the consent or approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under section 25 or section 25(a) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. 601, 615, shall be exempt from the requirements of the act if copies of all information and documentary material filed with the Board of Governors are contemporaneously filed with the Federal Trade Commission and Assistant Attorney General at least 30 days prior to consummation of the acquisition. In lieu of such information and documentary material or any portion thereof, an index describing such material may be provided in the manner authorized by § 802.6(a).

[43 FR 33544, July 31, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 34435, July 29, 1983]
#### § 305.32 [Reserved]
### §1395kkk. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title XI, §52001(a), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 298

Section, Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1899A, as added and amended Pub. L. 111–148, title III, §3403(a)(1), title X, §10320(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 489, 949, established the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10320(b), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 952, which provided that any reference in the provisions of, or amendments made by, section 3403 of Pub. L. 111–148 (enacting this section and section 1395kkk–1 of this title and amending section 1395b–6 of this title and section 207 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure) to the "Independent Medicare Advisory Board" be deemed to be a reference to the "Independent Payment Advisory Board", was repealed by Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title XI, §52001(b)(4), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 298.

#### Construction

Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10320(c), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 952, which provided that nothing in the amendments made by section 10320 of Pub. L. 111–148 precluded the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (renamed the Independent Payment Advisory Board) from solely using data from public or private sources to carry out former subsection (f)(3)(B) of this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title XI, §52001(b)(5), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 298.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of
Surrey Bancorp (the Company), we, Edward C. Ashby, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark H. Towe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III                       |  |  |  | Date: May 11, 2007 |  | 
|    |  | Edward C. Ashby, III.                          |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|    |  |                                                |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                               |  |  |  | Date: May 11, 2007 |  | 
|    |  | Mark H. Towe                                   |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|    |  | Sr. Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                    |  | 



22
#### § 456.4 Declaration of Commission Intent.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 60774, July 26, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 60775, July 26, 2024.

In prohibiting the use of waivers and disclaimers of liability in § 456.2(d), it is not the Commission's intent to impose liability on an ophthalmologist or optometrist for the ophthalmic goods and services dispensed by another seller pursuant to the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's prescription.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

October 3, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – COMSECY-16-0017 – STATUS OF 

ONGOING EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM 

RULEMAKING UNDER TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL 

REGULATIONS SECTION 50.46a AND 50.46c, AND GENERAL 

DESIGN CRITERION 35 AND REQUEST FOR CLOSURE OF 

RELATED TASKING 

 

The Commission has approved the staff’s request to close tracking the Commission’s Staff 

Requirements Memorandum M090204B, dated February 18, 2009, to keep the Commission 

informed of the status of rulemaking activities related to emergency core cooling system 

requirements, and discontinue the semi-annual Notes to the Commissioners’ Assistants related 

to emergency core cooling system requirements. 

The staff should inform the Commission of the outcome of the public meeting to be held on 

October 26, 2016, through a Daily Note item or other mechanism. If the NRC staff determines 

that it would not be prudent to proceed with the General Design Criterion 35 rulemaking after 

conducting the October 26, 2016 follow-up public meeting to seek stakeholders’ views, the staff 

should promptly notify the Commission and seek approval to terminate this activity. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

PDR
#### § 436.4 Table of contents.

Include the following table of contents. State the page where each disclosure Item begins. List all exhibits by letter, as shown in the following example.

# Table of Contents

1. The Franchisor and any Parents, Predecessors, and Affiliates

2. Business Experience

3. Litigation

4. Bankruptcy

5. Initial Fees

6. Other Fees

7. Estimated Initial Investment

8. Restrictions on Sources of Products and Services

9. Franchisee's Obligations

10. Financing

11. Franchisor's Assistance, Advertising, Computer Systems, and Training

12. Territory

13. Trademarks

14. Patents, Copyrights, and Proprietary Information

15. Obligation to Participate in the Actual Operation of the Franchise Business

16. Restrictions on What the Franchisee May Sell

17. Renewal, Termination, Transfer, and Dispute Resolution

18. Public Figures

19. Financial Performance Representations

20. Outlets and Franchisee Information

21. Financial Statements

22. Contracts

23. Receipts

Exhibits

A. Franchise Agreement
#### In the Matter of Richard E. Doling, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[819 NYS2d 489]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1969. He resides in Latham, Albany County.

By decision dated October 22, 1998, this Court suspended respondent from practice for a period of one year *(Matter of Doling,*254 AD2d 620 [1998]). The suspension was stayed upon several conditions set forth in the decision which stated that respondent could apply to this Court for termination of the suspension upon meeting the conditions.

Respondent now moves this Court to terminate the stayed suspension. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application and confirms that respondent has complied with the conditions set forth in this Court’s decision.

We grant respondent’s application and terminate the stayed suspension, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that the stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decision dated October 22, 1998 is terminated, effective immediately.
#### § 315.10 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, it is the Commission's intention that the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.
§ 1019.2 Definitions. As used in this subpart A of this part 1019: ( a ) *Consignee* means the person, partnership, corporation or entity in a foreign country to whom noncomplying goods are sent;
( b ) *Export* means to send goods outside the United States or United States possessions for purposes of trade, except the term does not apply to sending goods to United States installations located outside the United States or its possessions;
( c ) *Exporter* means the person, partnership, corporation or entity that initiates the export of noncomplying goods;
( d ) *Noncomplying goods* means any item described in § 1019.1(b), except for those items excluded from the requirements of these regulations by § 1019.1 (c), (d), and
( e ) .
(March 18, 1955.)

#### In the Matter of Minnie K. Becker, Appellant, against American Bosch Arma Corporation et al., Respondents.

Neither in their answer nor in their affidavits do respondents set forth any facts that raise a triable issue as to petitioner’s good faith in making application for an inspection of the stock book and stock transfer sheets of respondent corporation. Order modified and appellant’s motion for an inspection of the stock lists of respondent corporation granted. As so modified the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
ORAL ARGUMENTS SESSION ON REQUEST FOR HEARING ON NRC ORDERS

PLANNED FOR JUNE 7th IN BOSTON

A three-member Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will hear oral arguments 

on Thursday, June 7, on a hearing request regarding two NRC post-Fukushima orders. The 

session will begin at 10 a.m. in Courtroom 1 at the John W. McCormack Post Office and 

Courthouse, 5 Post Office Square, Boston.

The courtroom is located on the 12th floor.

On March 19, the NRC issued three orders in response to the March 2011 events at the 

Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan. The purpose of the orders is to enhance the safety of 

U.S. power reactors using lessons learned from Fukushima, which was severely damaged by an 

earthquake and tsunami.

In response to the issuance of the orders, two organizations, Pilgrim Watch and Beyond 

Nuclear, in early April submitted requests for a hearing on them. The orders being challenged 

deal with reliable hardened containment vents and spent fuel pool instrumentation. Beyond 

Nuclear has since withdrawn its hearing request.

The Pilgrim Watch hearing request states that the orders are not adequate to meet 

concerns stemming from the Fukushima accident.

After considering the request, the ASLB panel assigned to review it has concluded the 

filings raise several issues that require further exploration via an oral arguments session.

###

New releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

2100 Renaissance Blvd., King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-12-028

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

May 30, 2012

Email: opa1.resource@nrc.gov
### Part D—Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title IV, §1401(1), title V, §1502(c), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1696, 1701, redesignated part G as D and substituted "Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program" for "Rural Homeless Housing Assistance" in heading.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part D, consisting of sections 11391 to 11399, which related to safe havens for homeless individuals demonstration program, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title V, §1501, May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1701, effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title. See notes set out under former section 11389 of this title.

Prior parts E and F, consisting of sections 11401 to 11407b, which related to miscellaneous provisions and shelter plus care program, respectively, were repealed by Pub. L. 111–22, div. B, title V, §1501, May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1701, effective on the earlier of 18 months after May 20, 2009, or 3 months after publication of certain final regulations by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see section 1503 of Pub. L. 111–22, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 11302 of this title. See notes set out under former section 11389 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Leonard Catanzaro, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the County Court, Kings County, insofar as it dismissed the first three counts in an indictment, the said counts charging *1087defendant with the crimes of attempted sodomy in the first degree, attempted sodomy in the second degree and assault in the second degree. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking therefrom the first two ordering paragraphs, and by striking from the third ordering paragraph everything following the word “denied” and substituting therefor the words “in all respects”. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed. The first three counts of the indictment are reinstated. In our opinion, the evidence before the Grand Jury was prima facie sufficient to establish the offenses charged in the first three counts, within the purview of section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. *People*v. *Peary,*249 App. Div. 851.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

# AGENCY:

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has adopted a policy regarding the provision of information products and services to the public, which implements relevant provisons of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. part 35) and Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-130, “Management of Federal Information Resources.” This policy will strengthen the existing partnership between government, academia and the private sector, which provides the nation with high quality environmental information. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        The policy is available electronically at                         *http://www.nws.noaa.gov/​partnershippolicy*. Requests for hard copies should be sent to Room 11404, 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3283.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Peter Weiss 301-713-0258.                         *peter.weiss@noaa.gov.*

Dated: November 19, 2004. 

John E. Jones, Jr., 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Weather Services. 

[FR Doc. 04-26419 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-KE-P
#### § 251.302 All other organizations.

Under 5 CFR 550.311(b), an agency may permit an employee to make an allotment for any legal purpose deemed appropriate by the head of the agency. Agencies may provide for the allotment of dues for organizations representing Federal employees under that section.
NRC PRESENTING AT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEETING

AUG. 29 ON NRC-SPONSORED CANCER RISK STUDY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will present information during the National 

Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) fifth committee meeting on the NRC-sponsored study, “Analysis 

of Cancer Risks in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities: Phase 1.” The meeting’s public session 

will run from 1:20 p.m. – 5 p.m. on Monday, Aug. 29, at the Pew Charitable Trusts Conference 

Center, 901 E St., NW in Washington, D.C.

The NRC will outline potential next steps for the study and describe the agency’s public 

outreach and communications efforts. NRC staff will also be available to answer committee 

member questions. The Environmental Protection Agency will also present information to the 

committee. The public is welcome to attend and will have the opportunity to comment prior to 

the end of the meeting. The NAS asks members of the public to register for the meeting, and the 

NAS website has additional details, although they are subject to change. General questions on 

the study can be sent via e-mail to: crs@nas.edu. 

The NAS project will update the 1990 U.S. National Institutes of Health – National 

Cancer Institute (NCI) report, “Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities.” The NRC 

uses the 1990 NCI report as a primary resource when communicating with the public about 

cancer mortality risk in counties that contain or are adjacent to nuclear power facilities. In the 

new study, the NRC is asking the NAS to evaluate cancer diagnosis rates, in addition to mortality 

risk, for populations living near decommissioned, operating and proposed NRC-licensed nuclear 

facilities. Phase 1 of the NAS study will determine whether a technically defensible approach to 

meet the goals of the study request is feasible – and if so, the approach will be developed using 

scientifically sound processes for evaluating cancer risk that could be associated with nuclear 

facilities. 

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-155 August 24, 2011
#### Diamond State Food Products, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, and Delaware Food Products, Inc., Respondent, v. Jesse Lowenthal, Appellant-Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — ■ Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan and Bastow, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1024.]