alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--International Code Council, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Code Council, 
Inc. (``ICC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: International 
Code Council, Inc., Country Club Hills, IL. The nature and scope of 
ICC's standards development activities are: To develop standards on 
building construction.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26213 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. I-15-037 October 13, 2015 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Initiates Special Inspection at Millstone Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a Special Inspection at the Millstone Unit 2 

nuclear power plant to review issues associated with an “Unusual Event” declared at the facility on 

Oct. 4. The two-member team arrived at the Waterford, Conn., plant today to begin the review.

Operators at the plant declared an “Unusual Event” – the lowest of four levels of emergency

classification used by the NRC – at about 9:30 a.m. on Oct. 4. The declaration was based on reactor 

coolant system leakage of greater than 25 gallons per minute. The leakage came from a relief valve on 

the plant’s shutdown cooling system, which is used to provide cooling to the reactor when it is out of 

service. The Dominion-owned and operated plant was preparing to enter a refueling and maintenance 

outage at the time of the event.

In response to the leakage, the shutdown cooling system was isolated from the reactor coolant 

system, allowing repairs to be made and the return of the system to operational status. The emergency 

declaration was terminated at 11 a.m. All of the leakage was contained within other plant systems, as 

designed.

After conducting a preliminary assessment of the event, the NRC has determined that it meets 

the criteria for a Special Inspection. Among other things, the team will review operator response to the 

event, equipment performance and immediate corrective actions.

“Our initial review of the event has raised questions regarding operator performance,” NRC 

Region I Administrator Dan Dorman said. “We have determined that the use of a Special Inspection is 

appropriate in this case to help the NRC better understand Dominion’s response to the event.”

 A report documenting the team’s findings will be issued within 45 days after the conclusion of 

the inspection.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.27 Record of investments. ( a ) Each futures commission merchant which invests customer funds, and each derivatives clearing organization which invests customer funds of its clearing members' customers, shall keep a record showing the following: ( 1 ) The date on which such investments were made;
( 2 ) The name of the person through whom such investments were made;
( 3 ) The amount of money or current market value of securities so invested;
( 4 ) A description of the instruments in which such investments were made, including the CUSIP or ISIN numbers;
( 5 ) The identity of the depositories or other places where such instruments are segregated;
( 6 ) The date on which such investments were liquidated or otherwise disposed of and the amount of money or current market value of securities received on such disposition, if any; and
( 7 ) The name of the person to or through whom such investments were disposed of; and
( 8 ) Daily valuation for each instrument and readily available documentation supporting the daily valuation for each instrument. Such supporting documentation must be sufficient to enable auditors to verify the valuations and the accuracy of any information from external sources used in those valuations.
( b ) Each derivatives clearing organization which receives documents from its clearing members representing investment of customer funds shall keep a record showing separately for each clearing member the following: ( 1 ) The date on which such documents were received from the clearing member;
( 2 ) A description of such documents, including the CUSIP or ISIN numbers; and
( 3 ) The date on which such documents were returned to the clearing member or the details of disposition by other means.
( c ) Such records shall be retained in accordance with § 1.31. No such investments shall be made except in instruments described in § 1.25.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 3038-0007 and 3038-0024) [46 FR 54520, Nov. 3, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 63035, Dec. 30, 1981; 62 FR 42401, Aug. 7, 1997; 65 FR 78013, Dec. 13, 2000; 70 FR 28204, May 17, 2005; 77 FR 66322, Nov. 2, 2012]
### Part A—Procedures
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ASB Holding Company ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, we Joseph Kliminski,
President and Chief Executive Officer,  and Eric Heyer, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in such Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods  presented in the financial  statements
     included in such report.




Date:  May 14, 2004          /s/ Joseph Kliminski
                             -------------------------------------------------
                             Joseph Kliminski
                             President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 14, 2004          /s/ Eric B. Heyer
                             -------------------------------------------------
                             Eric B. Heyer
                             Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Glebe Juniors, Inc., Appellant. Radley Zucker, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [199 Mise. 934.]
### §13014. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13014 was editorially reclassified as section 20324 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
**Exhibit4.127**
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Erie Insurance Company, Appellant, and Bill J. Williams, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 318]

*1229Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered January 9, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The order denied the petition for an order permanently staying arbitration of the supplementary uninsured motorist claim of respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is granted.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of the supplementary uninsured motorist claim of respondent. On appeal from an order denying the petition, petitioner contends that its cancellation of a policy of automobile insurance issued to Tiffany A. Luterek was effective with respect to respondent and thus that there was no insurance in effect at the time of the underlying accident. The effectiveness of the notice of cancellation depends upon whether respondent was a “member [ ] of the insured’s household” at the time of the cancellation (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [3]). We conclude that Supreme Court erred in holding as a matter of law that respondent was not a member of the named insured’s household within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (3). We conclude, instead, that respondent on the date of cancellation “actually resided in the insured[’s] household with some degree of permanence and with the intention to remain for an indefinite period of time” *(Matter of Biundo v New York Cent. Mut,*14 AD3d 559, 560 [2005]). The record establishes that, although respondent and Luterek were platonic roommates, they were living as members of a single household and indeed were sharing the costs of maintaining their vehicles and the insurance thereon. We thus conclude that the policy was not in effect at the time of the accident. Under the circumstances, petitioner had no obligation to disclaim liability or to deny coverage *(see generally*Insurance Law § 3420 [d]; *Matter of Worcester Ins. Co. v Bettenhauser,*95 NY2d 185, 188-190 [2000]; *Zappone v Home Ins. Co.,*55 NY2d 131, 137-138 [1982]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 16 02

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Yov an ny Arold o M en di vi l-B al de rram a
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ne 21 , 20 19 Fi le d: Ju ly 3, 20 19 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re KELLY, BOW MAN, an d GRAS Z, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Yov an ny Men di vi l-B al de rram a di rect ly ap pe al s aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty in th e di st ric t co ur t to dr ug an d fir earm of fen se s, pu rs ua nt to a pl ea ag reem en t co nt ai ni ng 1

The Hon or ab le Ro se an n A. Ketc hm ark , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.an ap pe al waiv er. His co un se l ha s m ov ed fo r le av e to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f

un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , su gg es ti ng th at th e d i s tri ct co ur t im po se d a su bs ta nt iv el y

un reas on ab le sen te nc e.

W e co nc lu de th at th e ap pe al waiv er is va li d, ap pl ic ab le , an d en fo rcea bl e. See Uni te d St at es v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo rev ie w of va li di ty

an d ap pl ic ab il it y of ap pe al waiv ers ); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 88 9- 92 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ) (ap pe al waiv er sh ou ld b e en fo rced if ap pe al fal ls wit hi n
sc op e of waiv er, de fen da nt kn owi ng ly a nd vo lu nt ari ly en te red in to pl ea ag reem en t

a n d w a i ve r, an d en fo rci ng waiv er wou ld no t res ul t in m is carr ia ge of jus ti ce). Fu rth erm or e, we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo u nd no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al ou ts id e th e
sc op e of th e ap pe al waiv er. Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n, an d we di sm is s th is ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Fw: public comment on proposed smog standards

Jackie Ashley to: Tricia Crabtree 01/08/2010 12:16 PM

Cc: Alison Davis

Tricia -

Below is an email comment that we should add to the ozone docket once it opens. Thanks!

___________________________________

Jackie Ashley

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

US EPA

ashley.jackie@epa.gov

919-541-7664

Cathy Milbourn One for the docket -------------------------- 01/08/2010 11:35:14 AM

From: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Andrea Drinkard" <Drinkard.Andrea@epamail.epa.gov>, "Alison Davis" <davis.alison@epa.gov>

Date: 01/08/2010 11:35 AM

Subject: Fw: public comment on proposed smog standards

One for the docket

--------------------------

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

 From: john davidson [johnjdavidson@gmail.com]

 Sent: 01/08/2010 11:32 AM EST

 To: Cathy Milbourn; Lina Younes

 Subject: public comment on proposed smog standards

Dear Cathy and Linda,

Please let my voice be added to the many who support this proposal. I live in downtown 

Indianapolis and our air quality is terrible. Recently our city was rated as having the erd worst 

air quality in the USA and there are very few emission standards for consumers or industry. 

Beyond the scientific data, I can also add that I have had personal harm from the poor air quality. 

I live and work in downtown Indianapolis, and I often bike or walk to work. On numerous 

occasions I have had eye and nasal inflammation due to the poor air quality. There have even 

been occations where my eyes have discharged yellow fluid due to the high levels of chemicals 

and smog in the air. 

Thus I am support of this standard, and I would encourage you to increase the emission 

standards and water standards in our city and the nation. 

John D
-- 

John Davidson

Sustainability Consultant

Indianapolis, IN
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 12, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00060-CR

KENNETH RAY SOWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1007515

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The record before this court contains no appealable order. On March 22, 

2022, this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response 

has been received. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > List of Conferences in London, Paris, and Berlin, Held by Representatives of the National Monetary Commission, and of Papers and Statistics to be Prepared for the Commission

              																	United States. National Monetary Commission. 						*List of Conferences in London, Paris, and Berlin, Held by Representatives of the National Monetary Commission, and of Papers and Statistics to be Prepared for the Commission*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										1908,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4953,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §11704. Functions of Papa Ola Lokahi

#### (a) Responsibility

Papa Ola Lokahi shall be responsible for the—

(1) coordination, implementation, and updating, as appropriate, of the comprehensive health care master plan developed pursuant to section 11703 of this title;

(2) training for the persons described in section 11705(c)(1)(B) of this title;

(3) identification of and research into the diseases that are most prevalent among Native Hawaiians, including behavioral, biomedical, epidemiological, and health services; and

(4) the development of an action plan outlining the contributions that each member organization of Papa Ola Lokahi will make in carrying out the policy of this chapter.

#### (b) Special project funds

Papa Ola Lokahi is authorized to receive special project funds that may be appropriated for the purpose of research on the health status of Native Hawaiians or for the purpose of addressing the health care needs of Native Hawaiians.

#### (c) Clearinghouse

Papa Ola Lokahi shall serve as a clearinghouse for:

(1) the collection and maintenance of data associated with the health status of Native Hawaiians;

(2) the identification and research into diseases affecting Native Hawaiians;

(3) the availability of Native Hawaiian project funds, research projects and publications;

(4) the collaboration of research in the area of Native Hawaiian health; and

(5) the timely dissemination of information pertinent to the Native Hawaiian health care systems.

#### (d) Coordination of programs and services

Papa Ola Lokahi shall, to the maximum extent possible, coordinate and assist the health care programs and services provided to Native Hawaiians.

#### (e) Technical support

Papa Ola Lokahi shall act as a statewide infrastructure to provide technical support and coordination of training and technical assistance to the Native Hawaiian health care systems.

#### (f) Relationships with other agencies

Papa Ola Lokahi is authorized to enter into agreements or memoranda of understanding with relevant agencies or organizations that are capable of providing resources or services to the Native Hawaiian health care systems.

(Pub. L. 100–579, §5, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2919; Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2305, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4225; Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, §9168, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The 1992 amendment is based on section 1 of S. 2681, One Hundred Second Congress, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, and enacted into law by section 9168 of Pub. L. 102–396. Section 9168, which referred to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on "September 12, 1992", has been treated as referring to S. 2681, as passed by the Senate on Aug. 7, 1992, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 100–579 and Pub. L. 100–690 enacted substantially identical sections. The text of this section is based on section 5 of Pub. L. 100–579, as subsequently amended.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–396 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to administrative grant for Papa Ola Lokahi.
13a-15(e)
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ James W. Creamer, III

James W. Creamer, III
#### The Nulomoline Company, Appellant, v. Maxwell Tausek, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.; Scott, J., dissented.
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES TELECONFERENCE 

MEETING DEC. 15

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes

(ACMUI) will convene a teleconference meeting on Dec. 15 to discuss the ACMUI’s recommendations 

on proposed revisions to the Abnormal Occurrence medical event criteria.

The ACMUI advises the NRC on policy and technical issues related to the regulation of medical 

uses of certain radioactive materials.

The teleconference meeting will be held on Thursday, Dec. 15, from 2 to 3 p.m. EST. An 

ACMUI detailed agenda is available on the NRC website.

Questions from the public will be permitted at the discretion of the committee chairperson. Any 

member of the public wanting to provide a written statement or requiring special services, should contact 

Ashley Cockerham by e-mail at ashley.cockerham@nrc.gov or telephone at 240-888-7129.

All submittals must be received by Dec. 8, and must pertain to the topic on the meeting agenda. 

Any member of the public who wishes to participate in the meeting or via phone should contact Ashley 

Cockerham using the information above.

The meeting summary will be available at the end of January on the ACMUI Web page. The draft 

transcript will be available on or about Jan.15 on the ACMUI Web page and in the NRC Public 

Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. 20852-2738, phone 800-397-4209.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES 

link on the NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC's website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-219 December 5, 2011