alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 436.2 Obligation to furnish documents. In connection with the offer or sale of a franchise to be located in the United States of America or its territories, unless the transaction is exempted under subpart E of this part, it is an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act: ( a ) For any franchisor to fail to furnish a prospective franchisee with a copy of the franchisor's current disclosure document, as described in subparts C and D of this part, at least 14 calendar-days before the prospective franchisee signs a binding agreement with, or makes any payment to, the franchisor or an affiliate in connection with the proposed franchise sale.
( b ) For any franchisor to alter unilaterally and materially the terms and conditions of the basic franchise agreement or any related agreements attached to the disclosure document without furnishing the prospective franchisee with a copy of each revised agreement at least seven calendar-days before the prospective franchisee signs the revised agreement. Changes to an agreement that arise out of negotiations initiated by the prospective franchisee do not trigger this seven calendar-day period.
( c ) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the franchisor has furnished the documents by the required date if: ( 1 ) A copy of the document was hand-delivered, faxed, emailed, or otherwise delivered to the prospective franchisee by the required date;
( 2 ) Directions for accessing the document on the Internet were provided to the prospective franchisee by the required date; or
( 3 ) A paper or tangible electronic copy (for example, computer disk or CD-ROM) was sent to the address specified by the prospective franchisee by first-class United States mail at least three calendar days before the required date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board). 

# DATE AND TIME:

The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on December 2, 2004, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Closed Session 

    - Report on System Performance

## Open Session 

### Approval of Minutes 

    - September 16, 2004 (Regular Meeting)

### Business Reports 

    - Financials
    - Report on Insured Obligations
    - Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan       ( print page 69925)      

### New Business 

    - Premium Rates for 2005

## Closed Session 

    - Proposed Audit Plan

Dated: November 29, 2004. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board. 

[FR Doc. 04-26573 Filed 11-29-04; 1:26 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

RESPONSE SHEET 

Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary 

Chairman Burns 

COMSECY-16-0012: CORRECTION TO FEDERAL 

REGISTER NOTICE DISCONTINUING RULEMAKING 

ACTIVITIES 

Approved _L Disapproved _ Abstain Not Participating _ 

Comments: Below 

Entered in STARS 

Yes I/' 

No ---

Attached None X 

-

f July 2016 

DATE 
TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

RESPONSE SHEET 

Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary 

COMMISSIONER SVINICKI 

COMSECY-16-0012: CORRECTION TO FEDERAL 

REGISTER NOTICE DISCONTINUING RULEMAKING 

ACTIVITIES 

Approved XX Disapproved _ Abstain Not Participating _ 

Comments: Below XX Attached None 

I approve publication of the revised Federal Register notice, Enclosure 2 to COMSECY-16-0012. 

IGNATURE 

011 t(,1s 

DATE I 

Entered on "STARS" Yes ~ No_ 
TO: 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: 

Approved X 

RESPONSE SHEET 

Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary 

Commissioner Baran 

COMSECY-16-0012: CORRECTION TO FEDERAL 

REGISTER NOTICE DISCONTINUING RULEMAKING 

ACTIVITIES 

Disapproved _ Abstain Not Participating _ 

Comments: Below X Attached None 

I approve publication of the revised Federal Register notice with the clarifying 

language provided by the staff regarding the Next Generation Nuclear Plant project. 

Entered in STARS 

Yes 

No ---

ATURE 

7/'7/lb 

DATE
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Nova Chiropractic Services, P.C., as Assignee of Domingo Bustos, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Goldstein &amp; Flecker (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.Law Offices of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered February 10, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,184.94.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant's expert witness and granted plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,184.94.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Miguel A. Vizcaino v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1054 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 23, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**MENU**
Preface
Introduction

Ironing Out the Wrinkles

Photofile

Bibliography

Notes

Appendix A
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1452WM

_____________ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; * * Plaintiff, * * PSB Credit Services, Inc., * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Plaintiff-Appellant, * District of Missouri. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Robert Cotitta; Hazel M. Blanchard, * * Defendants-Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: September 12, 1997

Filed: September 18, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. PSB Credit Services, Inc. appeals the dis trict court's summary judgment rulings in f avor of Robert Cotitta on Counts I and II of the complaint. Having thoroughl y reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we affirm for the reasons given in the district court's opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §13554. Tar sands

#### (a) Policy

It is the policy of the United States to promote the development and production, by all means consistent with sound engineering, economic, and environmental practices, of deposits of tar sands.

#### (b) "Tar sands" defined

(1) For purposes of this section, the term "tar sands" means any consolidated or unconsolidated rock (other than coal, oil shale, or gilsonite) that either—

(A) contains a hydrocarbonaceous material with a gas-free viscosity, at original reservoir temperature, greater than 10,000 centipoise; or

(B) contains a hydrocarbonaceous material and is produced by mining or quarrying.

(2) Nothing in this section is intended or shall be construed to affect in any way the definition of the term tar sands under any other provision of Federal law.

#### (c) Study

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall submit a study to the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate within one year after October 24, 1992. Such study shall identify and evaluate the development potential of sources of tar sands in the United States. The study shall also identify and evaluate processes for extracting oil from the identified tar sand sources, including existing tar sands waste tailings, and evaluate the environmental benefits of, and the potential for co-production of minerals and metals from, such processes.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1993 and 1994 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXX, §3016, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3129.)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 366 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 366

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-251 (124 Stat. 2631), 
is amended by striking ``January 31, 2011'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``May 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 30, 2011.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 25, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 366

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
No: IV-16-001 January 25, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

NRC To Conduct Comprehensive Inspection at Arkansas Nuclear One

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a comprehensive inspection to assess the depth 

and breadth of the problems affecting performance at Arkansas Nuclear One, which is receiving the 

highest level of NRC scrutiny. The plant, in Russellville, Ark., is operated by Entergy Operations. 

A team of 25 inspectors will devote about 3,600 hours of effort to independently assess and 

document the adequacy of Entergy programs and processes used to identify, evaluate and correct 

performance issues; provide insights into the causes of performance deficiencies; and evaluate the 

adequacy of a third-party safety culture assessment conducted at the site.

Any deficiencies identified by the team will be discussed with Entergy officials at a public 

meeting and documented in a written report that will be made publicly available this spring. The NRC 

will then issue a Confirmatory Action Letter that documents commitments made by the licensee to 

address any identified deficiencies.

“This inspection is a very important element of our increased regulatory oversight of Arkansas 

Nuclear One as it provides for an independent evaluation of the extent of the performance problems at 

the site,” NRC Region IV Administrator Marc Dapas said. “It also includes an assessment of how 

thorough the licensee has been in identifying the extent of its problems and whether we think the 

planned corrective actions are of sufficient scope and depth to maintain performance improvement.”

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear 

plant performance. The colors start with green and then increase to white, yellow, or red, commensurate 

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Performance indicators are statistical measurements 

of plant and equipment performance. The NRC’s action matrix reflects overall plant performance and 

agency response. There are five columns in the matrix with Column 1 requiring a baseline level of 

inspections; plants in Column 5 are not permitted to operate. The NRC increases the level of oversight 

and inspection in a graded manner as plant performance declines.

In June 2014, the NRC issued yellow findings to Arkansas Nuclear One in connection with a 

2013 heavy equipment handling incident at the plant. In January 2015, the NRC issued yellow findings 

associated with flood protection at the plant. The cumulative effect of these violations moved the plant 

into Column 4. Arkansas Nuclear One is receiving the highest level of NRC oversight of operating 

plants.

Information about the plant’s current performance is available on the NRC web site.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C81” (“C81 Committee”), by its Secretariat, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ANSI Accredited Standards Committee “C81”, Rosslyn, VA. The nature and scope of C81 Committee's standard development activities are: To develop and maintain standards relating to electric lamp bases and holders. C81 Committee currently maintains four standards relating to different types of electric lamp bases and lamp holders. The standards developed by C81 Committee are published by NEMA.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-26620  Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Name of Subsidiary
    
    OwnershipCCI Southeast, LLC (CCISE)
    
    
    100.00
    %Riverdale Carwash Lot 3A, LLC (Riverdale)
    
    
    100.00
    %AARD-Cypress
Sound, LLC (Cypress Sound)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-TSD-CSK Firestone, LLC (Firestone)
    
    
    51.00
    %South Glen Eagles Drive, LLC (West Valley)
    
    
    51.00
    %119th and Ridgeview, LLC (Ridgeview)
    
    
    51.00
    %53rd and Baseline, LLC (Baseline)
    
    
    51.00
    %Hwy 278 and Hwy 170, LLC (Bluffton)
    
    
    51.00
    %State and 130th, LLC (American Fork)
    
    
    51.00
    %Clinton Keith and Hidden Springs, LLC (Murietta)
    
    
    51.00
    %Hwy 46 and Bluffton Pkwy, LLC (Bluffton 46)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Bader Family Dollar Flat Shoals, LLC (Flat Shoals)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Westminster OP7, LLC (Westminster OP7)
    
    
    51.00
    %Eagle Palm I, LLC (Eagle)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Econo Lube Stonegate, LLC (Econo Lube)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Bader Family Dollar MLK, LLC (MLK)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Charmar Greeley, LLC (Starbucks)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Charmar Greeley Firestone, LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD 5020 Lloyd Expy, LLC (Evansville)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD 2245 Main Street, LLC (Plainfield)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Buckeye, LLC (Buckeye)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 1, LLC (Esterra Mesa 1)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 2, LLC (Esterra Mesa 2)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 3, LLC (Esterra Mesa 3)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 4, LLC (Esterra Mesa 4)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD MDJ Goddard, LLC (Goddard)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Charmar Arlington Boston Pizza, LLC (Charmar Boston Pizza)
    
    
    51.00
    %L-S Corona Pointe, LLC (L-S Corona)
    
    
    50.01
    %
### Part B—Duties of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
### Part D—Specified Model Programs
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00343

- CV

IN RE LISA JAMIESON

Original Proceeding

From the County Court at Law No

. 2

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. P200719377

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 24, 2022, Relator filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in this Court.

On October 25, 2022, Relator filed a Motion for Eme rgency Stay asking this Court to stay

the trial court’s November 2, 2022 trial setting , and this Court granted the motion.

On November 10, 2022, Relator filed a motion to dismiss the Petition for Writ of

Mandamus filed on October 2 4 , 2022. Relator states that the parties have settled this

matter. Dismissal of this Petition for Writ of Mandamus would not prevent a party from

seeking relief to which it wou ld otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and theIn re Jamieson Page 2

Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on October 2 4 , 2022, is dismissed. Th is Court’s stay

entered on October 25, 2022 is lifted.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Just ice Johnson , and

Justice Smith

Motion granted; petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 22 , 2022

[ OT 06]
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

CONTACT: Ken Clark (Phone: 404-331-5503, E-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov )

Roger Hannah (Phone 404-331-7878, E-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov )

No. II-96-41 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Tuesday, April 16, 1996)

 Roger Hannah 404-331-7878 

 NRC LICENSING BOARD SETS PREHEARING

 CONFERENCE ON GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH REACTOR

 

 An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has scheduled a prehearing conference April

24 in Atlanta, Georgia, to discuss licensing issues involving the Georgia Tech research

reactor.

 The conference, which is open to the public, will begin at 2:00 p.m. at the U.S. Court

of Appeals, Courtroom 338, 56 Forsyth Street.

 Representatives of the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech), Georgians

Against Nuclear Energy (GANE), and the NRC staff will participate.

 Georgia Tech has requested renewal of the research reactor's operating license for an

additional 20 years. The Licensing Board has granted GANE's request to intervene and will

consider its allegation that management problems at the facility render it unsafe.

 Discussions at the conference will include the scheduling of witnesses for a hearing

to start May 20 in Atlanta and obtaining stipulations concerning the authenticity of certain

documents as well as admissions of fact.

 Members of the Licensing Board are Charles Bechhoefer, chairman, Dr. Jerry R. Kline

and Dr. Peter S. Lam.
----

----

**UNITEDSTATES****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

----

**FORM8-K**

CURRENTREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date ofReport (Date of Earliest Event Reported): **November 6,2003**

Commissionfile number:**1-07151**

THE CLOROXCOMPANY(Exact name of registrant as specified in itscharter)

| **Delaware**                   |
|--------------------------------|
| (State orother jurisdiction of |
| incorporation or organization) |
|                                |

****

| **1-07151**             | **31-0595760**                      |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| (CommissionFile Number) | (I.R.S.Employer Idenfification No.) |
|                         |                                     |

****

**1221Broadway****,****Oakland, California****94612-1888******(Address of principal executiveoffices)    (Zip code)

**(510) 271-7000******(Registrant's telephone number, includingarea code)

----

```
ITEM 12. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
```

```

```

```
         On November 6, 2003, The Clorox Company (the "Company") issued a news release with respect to earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. 
```

```

```

```

```

```
Exhibit
```

```

```

```
99. News Release by The Clorox Company dated November 6, 2003.
```

```

```

```

```

```

```

```
                                     
```

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to therequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registranthas duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by theundersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                                                       THE CLOROX COMPANY

Date:  November 6,2003                                  By:  /s/ PETER D. BEWLEY

                                                                              Peter D. Bewley

                                                                              Senior Vice President –General Counsel

                                                                              and Secretary

----