alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Rector, Churchwardens and Vestrymen of Trinity Church in the City of New York, Appellant. Cap Screw & Nut Co. of America, Incorporated, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Anthony R. Rosochacki, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-204;

Second District

August 19, 1974.

Frank Wesolowski, Jr., Public Defender, of Wheaton (Robert H. Heise, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

John J. Bowman, State’s Attorney, of Wheaton (Malcolm F. Smith, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE GUILD.
§ 5.59 Presiding official. ( a ) Upon the receipt of an answer and request for a hearing, the Secretary shall refer the matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, who shall appoint an Administrative Law Judge to preside over the hearing and shall notify the respondent and the General Counsel as to the person selected.
( b ) The powers and duties of the presiding official shall be as set forth in § 3.42(b) through (h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice.
§ 201.33 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The Act applies to adversary adjudications conducted by the Commission. These are on the record adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of an Office or Division of the Commission as a party, not including *amicus* participation, is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding. *See* appendix, 17 CFR 201.60.
( b ) The fact that the Commission has not identified a type of proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the Act; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
[47 FR 610, Jan. 6, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 53051, Dec. 27, 1989]
§ 300.16 Ornamentation. ( a ) Where the wool product contains fiber ornamentation not exceeding 5 percent of the total fiber weight of the product and the stated percentages of fiber content of the product are exclusive of such ornamentation, the stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification shall contain a phrase or statement showing such fact; as for example: 50% Wool 25% Recycled Wool 25% Cotton Exclusive of Ornamentation
The fiber content of such ornamentation may be disclosed where the percentage of the ornamentation in relation to the total fiber weight of the principal fiber or blend of fibers is shown; as for example: 70% Recycled Wool 30% Acetate Exclusive of 4% Metallic Ornamentation
( b ) Where the fiber ornamentation exceeds five per centum it shall be included in the statement of required percentages of fiber content.
( c ) Where the ornamentation constitutes a distinct section of the product, sectional disclosure may be made in accordance with § 300.23 of this part (Rule 23).
[29 FR 6625, May 21, 1964, as amended at 45 FR 44261, July 1, 1980]
§ 4.17 Disqualification of Commissioners. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to all motions seeking the disqualification of a Commissioner from any adjudicative or rulemaking proceeding.
( b ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) Whenever any participant in a proceeding shall deem a Commissioner for any reason to be disqualified from participation in that proceeding, such participant may file with the Secretary a motion to the Commission to disqualify the Commissioner, such motion to be supported by affidavits and other information setting forth with particularity the alleged grounds for disqualification.
( 2 ) Such motion shall be filed at the earliest practicable time after the participant learns, or could reasonably have learned, of the alleged grounds for disqualification.
( 3 ) ( i ) Such motion shall be addressed in the first instance by the Commissioner whose disqualification is sought.
( ii ) In the event such Commissioner declines to recuse himself or herself from further participation in the proceeding, the Commission shall determine the motion without the participation of such Commissioner.
( c ) *Standards.* Such motion shall be determined in accordance with legal standards applicable to the proceeding in which such motion is filed.
(15 U.S.C. 46(g))
[46 FR 45750, Sept. 15, 1981]
SERVED FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

;^;iTLiENT OF 

;-PORW!ON 

:ie-ER/VIiONS 

:D " 9 P 3: 08 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

INTERTECH OVERLOAD, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMSFAA-2010-0194 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has filed a Motion for 

Decision Without a Hearing Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Limit the Issues at Hearing 

to Sanction ("Motion") dated January 12, 2011. Complainant argues that Respondent 

Intertech Overload, Inc. ("Respondent") has admitted the facts underlying the charges. 

The Motion and attached Exhibits establish. Complainant contends, that Respondent 

violated the regulations at issue. Complainant also argues that Respondent's affirmative 

defenses fail. Finally, Complainant contends that the civil penalty it has proposed is 

reasonable and appropriate and should be adopted. 

Respondent has not answered the Motion. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. On or before February 18, 2011 (receipt date), Respondent shall file a 

response to this Order to Show Cause stating why the relief requested in Complainant's 

Motion should not be granted; 
2. Absent a full and complete response by the due date, Complainant's 

Motion may be granted in whole or in part. 

chard C. Goodwin 

' tlJiS. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

.,-;f 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

William H. Schultz, Respondent's Counsel 

Schultz Law Firm 

32123 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 203 

Westlake Village, CA 91361-5412 

TEL; 818-901-1919 

FAX: 818-901-1996 

Dean Cambe, Sr., President 

Intertech Overload, Inc., Respondent 

7701 Woodley Avenue 

VanNuys, CA 91406 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3930 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3930

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLACK 5.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 96-60372

___________________________

DESMOND EARL PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

STEVE PUCKETT, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Mississippi

Greenville Division (4:96-CV-59-S-B)

____________________________________________________ December 6, 1996

Before WISDOM, DAVIS, and DUHE’, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: 1

Desmond Phillips appeals the district court’s sua sponte

dismissal under § 1915(d) of his § 1983 complaint filed pro se and

in forma pauperis alleging that following a prison disciplinary

hearing he was placed on close confinement where he has remained

for approximately three years without annual classification

reviews. We VACATE and REMAND for further proceedings consistentwith this opinion.I.

We review the district court’s Sectio n 1915(d) dismissal of

Phillips' complaint for abuse of discretion. G raves v. Hampton
, 1

F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). Section 1915(d) “authorizes federal

courts to dismiss a claim filed in forma pauperis ‘if satisfied

that the action is frivolous or malicious.’” N eitzke v. Williams

,
490 U.S. 319, 109 S.Ct. 1827 (1989)(citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915).

Relying on Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. ___ , 132 L.Ed.2d 418,

115 S.Ct. 2293 (1995), the district court dismissed Phillips’

complaint as frivolous. In S andin

, the Supreme Court held that

thirty days disciplinary confinement did “not present the type of

atypical, significa nt deprivation in which a state might

conceivably create a liberty interest." S andin

, 115 S.Ct. at 2300.

In contras t, Phillips’ allegation that he has been subject to

disciplinary conf inement for three years without review arguably

presents an “atypical significant deprivation” that implica tes a

liberty interest. Because the argument is not frivolous, we vacate

the district court’s dismissal of the suit and remand for

reconsideration following further factual development.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
### §1395w–152. Miscellaneous provisions

#### (a) Access to coverage in territories

The Secretary may waive such requirements of this part, including section 1395w–103(a)(1) of this title, insofar as the Secretary determines it is necessary to secure access to qualified prescription drug coverage for part D eligible individuals residing in a State (other than the 50 States and the District of Columbia).

#### (b) Application of demonstration authority

The provisions of section 402 of the Social Security Amendments of 1967 (Public Law 90–248) shall apply with respect to this part and part C in the same manner it applies with respect to parts A and B, except that any reference with respect to a Trust Fund in relation to an experiment or demonstration project relating to prescription drug coverage under this part shall be deemed a reference to the Medicare Prescription Drug Account within the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.

#### (c) Coverage gap rebate for 2010

#### (1) In general

In the case of an individual described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 1395w–114a(g)(1) of this title who as of the last day of a calendar quarter in 2010 has incurred costs for covered part D drugs so that the individual has exceeded the initial coverage limit under section 1395w–102(b)(3) of this title for 2010, the Secretary shall provide for payment from the Medicare Prescription Drug Account of $250 to the individual by not later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of such quarter.

#### (2) Limitation

The Secretary shall provide only 1 payment under this subsection with respect to any individual.

#### (d) Treatment of certain complaints for purposes of quality or performance assessment

In conducting a quality or performance assessment of a PDP sponsor, the Secretary shall develop or utilize existing screening methods for reviewing and considering complaints that are received from enrollees in a prescription drug plan offered by such PDP sponsor and that are complaints regarding the lack of access by the individual to prescription drugs due to a drug management program for at-risk beneficiaries.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVIII, §1860D–42, as added Pub. L. 108–173, title I, §101(a)(2), Dec. 8, 2003, 117 Stat. 2149; amended Pub. L. 111–152, title I, §1101(a)(1), Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1036; Pub. L. 114–198, title VII, §704(d), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 402 of the Social Security Amendments of 1967, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 402 of Pub. L. 90–248, title IV, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 930, which enacted section 1395b–1 of this title and amended section 1395ll of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–198 added subsec. (d).

2010—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–152 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–198 applicable to prescription drug plans (and MA–PD plans) for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2019, see section 704(g)(1) of Pub. L. 114–198, set out as a note under section 1395w–101 of this title.
### §12645e. Audits and reports

The Corporation shall comply with applicable audit and reporting requirements as provided in the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (31 U.S.C. 901 note; Public Law 101–576) and chapter 91 of title 31 (commonly known as the "Government Corporation Control Act"). The Corporation shall report to the authorizing committees any failure to comply with such requirements.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §189B, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, §1612, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1540.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–576, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2838. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1990 Amendment note set out under section 501 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
#### Arthur Freund, Defendant in Error, v. Max Goldenberg, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 21,768.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Ryan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 31, 1916.

Rehearing denied February 14, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Arthur Freund, plaintiff, against Max Goldenberg, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on an oral contract of employment to extend from October 16, 1913, to January 15, 1914, at $45 per week. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $409.50, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

The evidence tended to show that plaintiff was experienced in the ladies’ ready-to-wear clothing business, and in October, 1913, was employed by a ladies’ cloak and suit concern, and making $25 a week, with a prospect of continued employment. At this time defendant and one Bruns purchased a bankrupt stock of merchandise. Neither had ever been in the ladies’ clothing business and they needed an experienced man to retail this stock. Defendant asked plaintiff to take charge of the sale of this merchandise, and plaintiff replied that it would not pay him to leave a steady position for a short time. An agreement was made that plaintiff should work for defendant from October 16th until the following January 15th at $45 a week. Plaintiff entered upon his duties and did the things which are usually done under such circumstances to attract customers, displaying skill and experience. The stock was smoked and burned and of old style, and did not sell at profitable prices. After a week and five days, defendant discharged plaintiff.

*597Abstract of the Decision.

Master and servant, § *84*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding as to wrongful discharge of servant.*In an action to recover on an oral contract of employment, where there was evidence that the cause of plaintiff’s discharge was the failure of defendant to do a profitable business, but where defendant attempted to justify the discharge on the ground that plaintiff made misrepresentations as to his ability, salary and length of service with his former employer, and that he was incompetent and did not perform his work in a good and workmanlike manner, evidence *held*sufficient to sustain a finding that plaintiff was wrongfully discharged.

Plaintiff sought to obtain other employment, and from October 28th until March 27th was able to secure a position for only three and a half weeks at $12 per week.

Eben F. Runyan, for plaintiff in error.

Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for defendant in error; Sigmund W. David, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of United
Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc. does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
United Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc. /s/ David G. PowersDavid G. PowersPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 2, 2004
No: II-15-023 April 13, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House April 21 to Discuss Agency’s 

2014 Assessment of Farley Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house for April 21 to 

provide information on the agency’s assessment of the two units at the Farley nuclear plant during 

2014. 

The informal open house is scheduled from 2 to 4 p.m. in the Dothan Downtown Library, 

445 North Oates Street in Dothan, Ala. There will be informational posters and NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions about the safety performance of the Farley plant as well as overall NRC 

oversight and inspection. 

The Farley plant is located near Columbia, Ala., about 18 miles east of Dothan. It is operated by 

Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

Overall, the NRC staff concluded that Farley Units 1 and 2 operated safely in 2014, and the 

plant will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections conducted at all nuclear power 

plants.

“NRC inspectors continually evaluate each nuclear plant’s safety, and each year we take a 

detailed look at that information to identify any trends and help plan future inspections,” said NRC 

Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “Inspection results are available throughout the year, but these 

annual meetings allow us to talk to local residents and answer any questions they may have.”

Routine inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the Farley plant, as well as current performance information for 

Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC website.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     December 12, 2016





CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-582336-6169860(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)











333 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois60604(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code     (312) 822-5000





NOT APPLICABLE(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions ( see General Instruction A.2. below):


[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
































1


---







ITEM 5.02(b) Departure of Director or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.


On December 12, 2016, the Registrant issued a press release announcing the retirement of Thomas Pontarelli, the Registrant’s Chief Administration Officer, effective December 31, 2016.  The press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.








ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS


(d)  ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1CNA Financial Corporation press release, issued December 12, 2016, announcing the retirement of Thomas Pontarelli, the Registrant’s Chief Administration Officer, effective December 31, 2016.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


CNA Financial Corporation(Registrant)Date:  December 12, 2016By/s/ Jonathan D. Kantor(Signature)Jonathan D. KantorExecutive Vice President,General Counsel and Corporate Secretary











2
Proposed Rule: Final Confidentiality Determinations for Nine Subparts and Amendments to Subpart A and I under 

the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule

Meeting Documentation: Phone Communication with 3M, March 16, 2012

Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #)

Name of Organization (Attach 

list of all attendees names and 

emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion 

(e.g., applicability, reporting 

requirements, etc.)

Written Comments 

Provided?

Did they also submit 

to Docket?

Date sent to

EPA- CCD

3/16/12

Lisa Grogan-McCulloch

Groganmcculloch.lisa@epa.gov

202-343-9743

3M

On the phone:

Jeff Muffat - Environmental 

Regulatory Affairs

Dana Schnobrich - Senior 

Environmental Engineering 

Specialist, Materials Resources 

Division

Kurt Werner - Business Manager, 

Electronics Markets Materials 

Division

Mike Parent - Senior Technical 

Manager, Electronics Markets 

Materials Division

Karna Peters - Outside General 

Counsel

Tom Herzberg - Division Scientist, 

Materials Resource Division

Jim Baker - Senior Intellectual 

Property Counsel

Among the issues: CBI 

determinations and trade secret 

concerns for subpart L

Submitted comments 

to the docket