alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 2, 2015 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-14-0144 – REQUEST BY 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR EXEMPTIONS FROM 

CERTAIN EMERGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS 

The Commission has approved the staff's recommendation to grant Southern California 

Edison's request for exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements of 10 CFR 

50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, as 

stipulated in SECY-14-0144. 

The Commission continues to support the current practice of approving appropriately justified 

exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements while plants are transitioning to 

decommissioning based on site-specific evaluations. 

The Commission looks forward to the staff addressing decommissioning issues in a 

comprehensive rulemaking. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 229.1110 (Item 1110) Originators. ( a ) Identify any originator or group of affiliated originators, apart from the sponsor or its affiliates, that originated, or is expected to originate, 10% or more of the pool assets. Also identify any originator(s) originating less than 10% of the pool assets if the cumulative amount originated by parties other than the sponsor or its affiliates is more than 10% of the pool assets.
( b ) Provide the following information for any originator or group of affiliated originators, apart from the sponsor or its affiliates, that originated, or is expected to originate, 20% or more of the pool assets: ( 1 ) The originator's form of organization.
( 2 ) To the extent material, a description of the originator's origination program and how long the originator has been engaged in originating assets. The description must include a discussion of the originator's experience in originating assets of the type included in the current transaction. In providing the description, include, if material, information regarding the size and composition of the originator's origination portfolio as well as information material to an analysis of the performance of the pool assets, such as the originator's credit-granting or underwriting criteria for the asset types being securitized.
( 3 ) Describe any interest that the originator, or any affiliate of the originator, has retained in the transaction, including the amount and nature of that interest. Disclose any hedge (security specific or portfolio) materially related to the credit risk of the securities that was entered into by the originator or, if known, by an affiliate of the originator to offset the risk position held. *Instruction to Item 1110(b)(3).* The disclosure required under this item shall separately state the amount and nature of any interest or asset retained in compliance with law, including any amounts that are retained by parties other than the originator in order to satisfy such requirements.
( c ) For any originator identified under paragraph (b) of this section, if such originator is required to repurchase or replace a pool asset for breach of a representation and warranty pursuant to the transaction agreements, provide information regarding the originator's financial condition to the extent that there is a material risk that the effect on its ability to comply with the provisions in the transaction agreements relating to the repurchase obligations for those assets resulting from such financial condition could have a material impact on pool performance or performance of the asset-backed securities.
[70 FR 1597, Jan. 7, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 57314, Sept. 24, 2014]
October 31, 2016 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

Enclosed is the September 2016 Monthly Congressional Status Report. The monthly 

status report is provided in accordance with Section 402(e) of the Energy and Water 

Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016. Please feel free to contact me or 

Eugene Dacus, Director of Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776, if you have any 

questions or need information.

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein 

 Alexander Louie, OMB 
 October 31, 2016 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

Enclosed is the September 2016 Monthly Congressional Status Report. The monthly 

status report is provided in accordance with Section 402(e) of the Energy and Water 

Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016. Please feel free to contact me or 

Eugene Dacus, Director of Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776, if you have any 

questions or need information.

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

 Alexander Louie, OMB 

 
 

Identical letter sent to:

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein 

cc: Alexander Louie, OMB 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

cc: Alexander Louie, OMB
No: 16-068 November 23, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Requests Public Comment, Schedules Meeting on

Issues Paper for Packaging and Transporting Radioactive Material

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission this week asked for public input on issues to be 

considered in revising its regulations for packaging and transporting radioactive material. NRC staff 

will use comments received in developing a regulatory basis for a proposed rule.

The NRC’s current transportation regulations are based, in part, on standards developed by the 

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an international standard-setting organization. The IAEA 

periodically revises its transportation standards to reflect acquired knowledge and expertise. The NRC 

is beginning the process to update its own regulations to be compatible with the IAEA’s.

The NRC and the U.S. Department of Transportation share regulatory authority over radioactive 

material transport. DOT is the lead federal agency for regulating hazardous materials transport in the 

United States and for interacting with the IAEA. The NRC will coordinate changes to its regulations 

with DOT.

To help guide public input, the NRC has published an issues paper that outlines areas identified 

for possible revision. These topics include the requirements for small amounts of fissile material, solar 

heat and external package pressure, and shipping low activity waste and large solid contaminated 

objects. The staff will also consider whether to create a new category of more robust packages. These 

issues are described in greater detail in a Nov. 21 Federal Register notice.

The NRC will hold a two-day meeting at agency headquarters in Rockville, Md., to give an

overview and answer clarifying questions on the issues paper. The meeting will be held Dec. 5-6, from 

9 a.m. to 5 p.m., at Two White Flint North, room T2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike. NRC staff will not take

public comments at the meeting. All individuals planning to attend should pre-register by Dec. 2 to 

obtain meeting material by contacting Emma Wong at Emma.Wong@nrc.gov or 301-415-7091, or 

Thomas Young, Thomas.Young@nrc.gov or 301-415-5795.

The public will also be able to participate remotely by teleconference and webinar. Callers 

should dial 888-801-8932 and input passcode 4882584#. Those participating by webinar should preregister. More information is available in the meeting notice.

The public may also submit written comments through Jan. 20, 2017. The issues paper is 

available on the federal rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, under Docket ID NRC-2016-0179.

Comments may be submitted on that website; by email to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov; by fax to 
Page | 2

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 301-415-1101; or by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, R. Brooks Sherman Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared:

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and present in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 19, 2006



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




45
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70291-70292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Order of Suspension of Trading

    In the Matter of Asset Equity Group, Inc., GEMZ Corp., Household 
Direct, Inc., International Brands, Inc., Interspace Enterprises, 
Inc., Mega Micro Technologies Group, Inc., and Vertical Computer 
Systems, Inc.

    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities 
of:
    (1) Asset Equity Group, Inc. because the company has been 
delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending December 
31, 2001;
    (2) GEMZ Corp.;
    (3) Household Direct, Inc. because the company has been delinquent 
in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending March 31, 2002;
    (4) International Brands, Inc. because the company has been 
delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending December 
31, 2000;

[[Page 70292]]

    (5) Interspace Enterprises, Inc. because the company has been 
delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending September 
30, 2002;
    (6) Mega Micro Technologies Group, Inc. because the company has 
been delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending December 
31, 2000; and
    (7) Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. because the company has been 
delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the period ending September 
30, 2003.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. 
e.s.t. on December 1, 2004, through 11:59 p.m. e.s.t. on December 14, 
2004.

    By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-26715 Filed 12-1-04; 11:48 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-13-0108 - Staff Recommendations for Addressing Remediation Of Residual Radioactivity During Operations

Accession Number: ML13217A230

Date Released: Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML13218A731 - SECY-13-0108 - Staff Recommendations for Addressing Remediation Of Residual Radioactivity During Operations (9 page(s), 10/7/2013)
    - ML13218A881 - SECY-13-0108 - Enclosure 1:  Summary of Public Comments on Potential Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations Docket ID:  NRC-2011-0162, August 15, 2013 (24 page(s), 10/7/2013)
    - ML13253A183 - SECY-13-0108 - Enclosure 2:  Staff Evaluation of Alternatives to Address Remediation During Operations (2 page(s), 10/7/2013)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §13479. Spark M. Matsunaga Renewable Energy and Ocean Technology Center

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the late Spark M. Matsunaga, United States Senator from Hawaii, was a longstanding champion of research and development of renewable energy, particularly wind and ocean energy, photovoltaics, and hydrogen fuels;

(2) it was Senator Matsunaga's vision that renewable energy could provide a sustained source of non-polluting energy and that such forms of alternative energy might ultimately be employed in the production of liquid hydrogen as a transportation fuel and energy storage medium available as an energy export;

(3) Senator Matsunaga also believed that research on other aspects of renewable energy and ocean resources, such as advanced materials, could be crucial to full development of energy storage and conversion systems; and

(4) Keahole Point, Hawaii is particularly well-suited as a site to conduct renewable energy and associated marine research.

#### (b) Purpose

It is the purpose of this section to establish the facilities and equipment located at Keahole Point, Hawaii as a cooperative research and development facility, to be known as the Spark M. Matsunaga Renewable Energy and Ocean Technology Center.

#### (c) Establishment

The facilities and equipment located at Keahole Point, Hawaii are established as the Spark M. Matsunaga Renewable Energy and Ocean Technology Center (in this section referred to as the "Center").

#### (d) Administration

(1) Not later than 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary may authorize a cooperative agreement with a qualified research institution to administer the Center.

(2) For the purpose of paragraph (1), a qualified research institution is a research institution located in the State of Hawaii that has demonstrated competence and will be the lead organization in the State in renewable energy and ocean technologies.

#### (e) Activities

The Center may carry out research, development, educational, and technology transfer activities on—

(1) renewable energy;

(2) energy storage, including the production of hydrogen from renewable energy;

(3) materials applications related to energy and marine environments;

(4) other environmental and ocean research concepts, including sea ranching and global climate change; and

(5) such other matters as the Secretary may direct.

#### (f) Matching funds

To be eligible for Federal funds under this section, the Center must provide funding in cash or in kind from non-Federal sources for each amount provided by the Secretary.

#### (g) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this section such sums as may be necessary, to be derived from sums authorized under section 13471(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2119, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3080.)
No: 13-058 July 8, 2013

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Public Meetings July 17 to Discuss Environmental Review of 

Proposed Wisconsin Radioisotope Production Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold two public meetings July 17 in Janesville, Wis., 

to discuss the environmental review of an application by SHINE Medical Technologies Inc. for a 

permit to construct a facility to produce medical radioisotopes.

NRC staff members will present an overview of the environmental review process and take 

comments from the public on the scope of issues that should be covered by the review. The July 17 

meetings will be held from 1:30-3:30 p.m. and 7-9 p.m. at the Rotary Botanical Gardens, 1455 Palmer 

Drive in Janesville. NRC staff will hold an open house for an hour before each meeting to meet 

informally with interested members of the public.

SHINE submitted a partial application for the facility on March 26, including its environmental 

report. The NRC staff has reviewed the partial application and concluded it is sufficient to docket and 

begin formal safety and environmental reviews. In separate notices published July 1 in the Federal 

Register, the NRC announced the docketing and its intention to prepare an environmental impact 

statement. SHINE submitted the remainder of the application May 31. Once the NRC determines that 

information is sufficiently complete, the agency will publish a notice of opportunity to request a 

hearing.

SHINE proposes to produce molybdenum-99 using a particle accelerator to induce fission from 

low-enriched uranium without reaching criticality. Mo-99 is used in medicine to produce technecium99m, an isotope used in thousands of diagnostic procedures annually in the United States.

Comments on the scope of the environmental impact statement will be accepted through Aug. 

30. Complete instructions for submitting comments are in the Federal Register notice. They may be 

submitted over the federal government’s rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID 

NRC-2013-0053.
Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, David G. Powers, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United CommunityBankshares of Florida, Inc. 2 Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including our consolidated subsidiary, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of the internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     Date: August 2, 2004 By: /s/ David G. Powers       David G. Powers   President and Chief Executive Officer
### §15383. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15383 was editorially reclassified as section 20983 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### Anonymous, Appellant-Respondent, v. Anonymous, Respondent-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — • Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*pp. 769, 868.]