alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Paul Calabresi Award for Clinical Oncology PAR-04-096.                     

*Date:*                         January 20, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                              ( print page 69615)    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert Bird, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., MSC 8328, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-7978,                         *birdr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 22, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26364 Filed 11-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §13711. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13711 was editorially reclassified as section 12111 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §12871. Program authority

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to make—

(1) planning grants to enable applicants to develop homeownership programs; and

(2) implementation grants to enable applicants to carry out homeownership programs.

#### (b) Authority to reserve housing assistance

In connection with a grant under this part, the Secretary may reserve authority to provide assistance under section 1437f of this title to the extent necessary to provide rental assistance for a nonpurchasing tenant who resides in the project on the date the Secretary approves the application for an implementation grant, for use by the tenant in another project.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title IV, §421, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4162; Pub. L. 102–550, title I, §181(a)(2)(B)(i), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3735.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle B (§§421–431) of title IV of Pub. L. 101–625, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4162, which enacted this part and amended section 1709 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–550 struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated for grants under this part $51,000,000 for fiscal year 1991 and $280,000,000 for fiscal year 1992. Any amounts appropriated pursuant to this subsection shall remain available until expended."
[Civil No. 344.]

#### AH YOU, Appellee, v. DON YEN, Appellant.

APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. R. E. Sloan, Judge,

Barnes & Martin, for Appellant.

C. W. Wright, for Appellee.

September 29, 1892.

Dismissed.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-057 September 10, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST MEPROLIGHT, INC.,

FOR VIOLATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Meprolight, Inc.,

for the improper distribution of products from its facility in Yonkers, N.Y. The products, which

contained NRC-licensed material, were distributed before the Washington, D.C.-based company

obtained a license from the agency allowing it to do so.

NRC officials said the significance of the violation by Meprolight was low because the

distributed items -- sights and aiming devices for small arms and archery equipment -- were designed

for use by individuals with little radiation safety training and contain only small quantities of tritium, a

licensed radioactive material. Nevertheless, the violation represents a careless disregard of NRC

requirements and is a significant concern because the agency relies upon the employees of NRClicensed firms to comply with its regulations.

The violation was identified during an NRC inspection conducted on October 26 and

November 2 and 14, 2001, at the Yonkers facility, and during a subsequent investigation by the

agency’s Office of Investigations. Specifically, the NRC determined that Meprolight distributed more

than 2,300 of the devices in two shipments, on December 20 and 27, 2000. This occurred even though

the company did not receive an NRC license allowing such distribution until January 8, 2001.

A predecisional enforcement conference between NRC staff and Meprolight was held on July

10 to discuss the violation and related issues. At that meeting, company representatives acknowledged

the violation but denied that any Meprolight employees had acted with careless disregard of NRC

regulations.

Meprolight has 30 days to pay the fine or appeal it. If the fine is appealed and subsequently

upheld by NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

###
No. 16-004 January 27, 2016

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Renews Operating Licenses of Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant in Illinois

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Braidwood 

nuclear plant, Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years. 

The Braidwood plant has two pressurized-water reactors, located in Braceville, Ill., about 

20 miles southwest of Joliet. The renewed licenses authorize the reactors to operate through Oct. 17, 

2046, for Unit 1 and Dec. 18, 2047, for Unit 2. The operator, Exelon Generation Co., submitted its 

renewal application May 29, 2013.

The NRC staff’s review of the application proceeded on two tracks. A safety evaluation report

(also covering Exelon’s Byron plant in Illinois) was issued July 6, 2015. A supplemental environmental 

impact statement on Braidwood was issued Nov. 12, 2015. These documents, as well as other 

information about the Braidwood license renewal, are available on the NRC website. The NRC’s 

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards also reviewed the staff’s work. 

Renewal of Braidwood’s operating licenses brings to 83 the number of commercial nuclear 

power reactors with renewed licenses (two of those have since permanently shut down). Applications 

for an additional 11 renewals are currently under review. Information about these reviews can be found 

on the NRC website.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION 

I 

Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave.
 

NORTH DAKOTA Bismarck, NO 58501-1947
 

DEPARTMENT oj HEALTH 701.328.5200 (fax)
 

www.ndhealth.gov
 I 

August 17,2009 

Ms. Callie Videtich (8P-AR)
 

Director, Air Program
 

U.S. EPA, Region 8
 

1595 Wynkoop Street
 

Denver, CO 80202-1129
 

Re: April 2003 SiP Revision 

Dear Ms. Videtich: 

On April 17, 2003, the Department submitted reV1510ns to the North Dakota State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the control of air pollution. Within the summary of proposed 

revisions (Section 2) it was indicated that NDAC 33-15-01-13.1.d was modified to include 

language regarding minimization of emissions during maintenance shutdown periods. However, 

the copy of NDAC 33-15-01 that was submitted did not contain any revisions to NDAC 33-15­

01-13.l.d. It appears that the proposed change was not published by the North Dakota 

Legislative Council. The revision summary was in error and there was no proposed revision to 

NDAC 33-15-01-13.1.d of the SIP. 

If your staff has any questions, please feel free to contact Tom Bachman of my staff at 

(701) 328-5188. 

;:4od 

Terry L. O'Clair, P.E. 

Director 

Division of Air Quality 

TLO/TB:saj 

xc: Amy Platt, EPA Region 8 

Environmental Health Division of Division of Division of Division of 

Section Chief's Office Air Quality Municipal Facilities Waste Management Water Quality 

701.328.5150 701.328.5188 701.328.5211 701.328.5166 701.328.5210 

Printed on recycled paper.
#### In the Matter of Charles Wolff, Deceased.

Decree affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
From: French, Chuck <French.Chuck@epa.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 2:09 PM

To: Chin, Conrad; Mulrine, Phil; Bradley Nelson

Subject: FW: Question regarding costs of disposing ACI mercury control wastes

See below info regarding ACI disposal costs from MATS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Eschmann, Erich 

Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 1:38 PM 

To: Maxwell, Bill; Hutson, Nick 

Cc: Stevens, William 

Subject: RE: Question regarding costs of disposing ACI mercury control wastes

For cases where a baghouse is added, our S&L model assumes that the existing ESP stays in service 

collecting uncontaminated fly ash. Only the much smaller tonnage of ACI sorbent is costed at an 

incremental $30/ton for disposal. This is the same $/ton disposal cost used for FGD waste in cases 

where FGD is added for other reasons.

For cases where a baghouse is not added, our S&L model assumes that the existing ESP collects 

contaminated fly ash. The total fly ash plus ACI sorbent tonnage is costed at an incremental $30/ton for 

disposal.

We do not refer to ACI-contaminated fly ash as “hazardous” in the model documentation, and I’m not 

certain the assumed $30/ton disposal cost would represent hazardous waste disposal.

Erich Eschmann

Clean Air Markets Division

U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation

202 343-9128 Phone

202 343-2359 Fax

eschmann.erich@epa.gov
#### In the Matter of Edwin Bonilla, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[820 NYS2d 661]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered February 21, 2006, in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying his request for parole release.

Petitioner was convicted in 1983 of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 22 years to life and 6 to 18 years, respectively. In October 2004, petitioner made his initial appearance before respondent and his request for parole release was denied. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to review respondent’s determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

A review of the record fails to support petitioner’s contention that the relevant statutory factors were not considered in denying his request for release on parole. A review of the parole *1071hearing transcript reveals that in addition to discussing the instant offense, consideration was also given to petitioner’s participation in numerous institutional programs and achievements, good disciplinary history, remorse for the crime and plans upon release. Although respondent emphasized petitioner’s instant offense, it was not required to give equal weight to or discuss every factor it considered in rendering its determination *(see Matter of Vasquez v Dennison,*28 AD3d 908 [2006]; *Matter of Prout v Dennison,*26 AD3d 540, 541 [2006]). Inasmuch as the record establishes that the denial of petitioner’s request for parole was based upon consideration of relevant statutory factors, and “there is [no] showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; *see*Executive Law § 259-i [2] [c] [A]), further judicial review is unwarranted *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [5]). Moreover, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that the determination was predetermined and the parole hearing was not fair and impartial. Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including that the denial amounts to a resentencing and that it was the result of a political agenda, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Contact Us

#   National Service Center for Environmental Publications

          -                  New Titles      
The New Title list is a selection of newly received Agency documents available to view online.

**Browse the New Titles List**
 

### Search Publications

When searching by EPA publication number, remove the prefix and all non-alphanumeric characters.For example, change: **EPA 600/R-04-030.A** to **600R04030A**

**Choose from what is available for viewing online...**

**Refine your search:**

How to Simple Search | Advanced Search(How to) / Field Search(How to) / All Ways to Search and Browse

##         Featured Publication          

**Title:**EPA Home Water Testing Facts**Publication:**816F05013

The Safe Drinking Water Act regulates approximately 150,000 public water systems in the United States. Consumer Confidence Reports are available from your water supplier to see whether the system meets state and EPA drinking water standards. So do you ever need to test your home’s water? Read this fact sheet to find out when to consider home testing.

##         EPA Publications          

You can search, retrieve, and download EPA technical, scientific, and educational materials from this site – **all free of charge!**

##         Need an EPA Publication Number?          

Request an EPA Publication Number(EPA Staff Only)

##         NSCEP Publication Feeds          

Get notified when documents are added to the NSCEP repository

##         More About NSCEP          

                - Ways to Search and Browse NSCEP
                - Retrieving and Printing NSCEP Publications
                - Frequent Questions about Using NSCEP
                - Contact NSCEP for Direct Assistance

Contact Us
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 2

- 00 042

- CR

IN RE Michael IDROGO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 19, 2012, relator filed a petition entitled “Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto

and/or Petition for Writ of Error and/ or Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” The court has

considered relator’s petition and supplemental petition and is of the opinion that relator is not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENI ED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 342465 , styled State of Texas v. Michael Idrogo

, in the County Court No.

6, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Wayne Christian presiding.
No: 16-036 June 27, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

CampCo. Agrees to New License Conditions,

NRC Waives Fine over Tritium Watch Violations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and CampCo. Inc. of Los Angeles, have reached a 

settlement agreement to address violations of NRC requirements related to importing and distributing 

watches containing radioactive material. In December 2015, the NRC proposed a $28,000 fine but has 

agreed to waive the fine as part of the settlement reached through the alternative dispute resolution 

mediation process. The NRC is issuing a Confirmatory Order to make the agreed-upon actions part of 

the company’s license.

The NRC found the company imported watches containing the radioactive isotope tritium and 

distributed them to individuals and another company in violation of the NRC’s import and distribution 

regulations. Initial distribution of tritium watches must be made under an NRC license to ensure the 

devices meet safety requirements, but they are exempt from regulation once they are initially 

distributed. Retailers and consumers do not need a license to own them.

The watches contain a small amount of tritium in glass vials. The radioactive material ionizes a 

luminescent coating on the inside of the vial to produce light so that the markers on the watch face and 

hands can be seen in low light.

CampCo. holds an NRC exempt distribution license and is authorized to distribute several 

models of watches containing tritium. However, the NRC found the company imported and distributed 

a model for which it was not authorized, violating NRC reporting requirements.

In the settlement, CampoCo. agreed to a number of corrective actions, including various 

communications about regulatory requirements targeting consumers and manufacturers of tritium 

watches; stronger employee training requirements; and improvements to work processes.
### subpart 6—national student and parent mock election
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04637**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04637\04637_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04637\04637_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04637\04637_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04637\04637_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04637\04637_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04637\04637_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04637\Water Balance Diagram.xls Plant submitted survey file

04637\Certification Statement Plant ID 04637.pdf Plant certification statement x 04637\Follow-up\Apache_Station_04637.doc Follow-up material as part of survey. x 04637\Supplemental Documents\04637_PartA_QA5-3_Plant Water Balance.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04637\Supplemental Documents\Part A_QA5-2_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04637\04637_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04637\04637_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Edward J. Danziger v. Hearst Corporation et al.

Present— Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 560.]
#### § 14.3 Hearings.

Hearings required or permitted to be held under provisions of this part shall be held before an Administrative Law Judge, utilizing the procedures established in the rules of practice (part 10) for adjudicatory proceedings. Any proceeding brought under provisions of this part shall, unless otherwise determined by the Commission, be prosecuted by the General Counsel of the Commission or by such attorneys in his office as he may assign.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-12-0133 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models

Accession Number: ML12220A604

Date Released: Monday, October 22, 2012

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML12220A606 - SECY-12-0133 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models (6 page(s), 10/4/2012)
    - ML12220A608 - SECY-12-0133 - Enclosure 1: Results, Trends, and Insights of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program (14 page(s), 10/4/2012)
    - ML12220A609 - SECY-12-0133 - Enclosure 2: Status of the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models (6 page(s), 10/4/2012)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Eight West Thirtieth Street Corp., Respondent, v. Zelart Drug Co., Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 716.8 On-site monitoring of Schedule 1 facilities.

Declared Schedule 1 facilities are subject to verification by monitoring with on-site instruments as provided by the Convention. For facilities subject to the CWCR, however, such monitoring is not anticipated. The U.S. Government will ensure that any monitoring that may be requested by the OPCW is carried out pursuant to the Convention and U.S. law.
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON, AND INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL ACTIVITIES FOR, ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM; REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3556 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 

the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2011 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Ms. HOCHUL, Mr. OWENS, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. 

HANNA, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

GIBSON, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. KING of New 

York, Ms. HAYWORTH, Mr. REED, Mr. TONKO, Mr. BISHOP of New 

York, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New 

York, Mr. NADLER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

GRIMM, Ms. BUERKLE, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. TURNER of New York) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, 

New York, as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, 

5 Buffalo, New York shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3556 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Olga T. Rocco, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.