alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

June 1, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – COMSECY-16-0009 – REQUEST 

APPROVAL TO SUNSET ANNUAL UPDATE ON THE 

PROGRESS OF MATERIALS LICENSEES IN ADDRESSING 

SAFETY CULTURE 

The Commission has approved the staff’s request to sunset the annual requirement of informing 

the Commission through a Commissioners’ Assistants note on the progress of materials 

licensees in addressing safety culture. 

In lieu of an annual CA note, the NRC staff should report on the status of materials licensee 

efforts to address safety culture during public Commission meetings on the appropriate 

business line. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

PDR
#### Arthur O. Louis, as Executor and Trustee under the Will of Inga M. Anderson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Joseph C. Anderson, Respondent.

*664No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.
!"
#
$%





 &'
(
#
)


#


&
	

	
(&

)


(
&*	

	


 
#

	
+ ,(
&



	
	&
+,$
&
(
	


#





	


 (

&
-

#


&
(


	
#






&




! 
	

	


.

/$
&

&#


(

(&	



(


/
!


'
"
(
	


#


)


 #


01&"
(
	




(
	
	
-#


-&

	
-(
&
(
	
)


	
&

&


#	


	
(	+#
	
234)53316,







/
(
'


	

	

	

	


#



&'
&






	&
(
&

(
	


7
(

(
#









	&

(&'



-
&
/
#



#


(&("
(
	
(-
&
(
	


	
&"
(
	
(/
	


&
(
	#









	




	
&

-

"
(
	
(
	
	
-


-

(
	

(
(
(
)



&

&
#"
(
	
(-

				


	

	



"
 
#
(

$#
(
#
(&
&
(
		(
)




.
	
(




(
(
-(







&(
#
/"



8433&

	
(

(


(
	
#
/	


/(&
(
	
	(


#
&








-
		


(


#
((
#
(

$






	
(




#


-

	

	

	

	
&/



&
$
)

&#

 

!"" ##$ $%!&

	
	






	
	#
/





(#&




/

!


(
	


&



$

	(
*

9 	

	
&#
(#
	
)



	
(
	

	
&#
(

#
	


	
&
&
&#


&#

#


:(

9 	&
	
)0&+

;

-



(


&
#
	&
(
:


.&
-#/
&
-
&)

&

	(-

	

-(	

)


,

$
#&
(
		(

-



/
&
#*

9 
&
(((

(	-)


-	

	
#


)

&
:

9  
	
((


9 	



-		

-
-	/)


-/

#-
	:(

9 
/
(<#;
(

54



	
&'


#
	
234)5335=

"5==4


	
	


>

(;


&


-(

	
&
	




&



(



"/
 
	



?!7
&

	

	
/

	

	


	
( 
#

 

&



	


+ ,$
 
/
&
(
	(



&
((	



((
	
(

'
#




(


&/

(
	

-



#	
-
	





	!
"#
$
%


&+#
	
234)53303,

!7


(

@!7
&

9 
#
-#
	

&
(
	







	)


$


&	&
&

(	-	

	-
-
		


&
(
	

-&/



&



	



	
'
&
(
	
	(


(

	&(	-	

	-
-


	

9 @
	
(
#/

(


#

(


#
(
	(-(
/
(




(
(
$





(

	

	
&
#


		
	#
&

;
(
	

#
	&

	/


 (

		)





9 /(		
&
/



	/#
&

	





	

&



(

#



(-

(


(-(

-

-
	

9 

/
-#<#-



(

#	(



&(
/


9 7



 



(((
)



&
#&
(
		)

(

(

	(
	







 
$
!

%







	


	


&




 
	

('
	/
#



	#


#






.&#


&/



(
	

	
&
*

9 
/
-

9 &



#
	&
(


	
-(

9 (	
&
(
		
	







	







&

&
(
	


#


+!&


&
(
		
	&

	
	/)


&




	



	
((#





7	

	
;

&#
-

 !"" ##$ $%-	


&

)1A51(()1A54	
)

(
,



!

%	/$/


/



	



	
#


	





/$




&




 &#
#
#	/

/





#

&



&



-/	



	

	
	
#	
-

'	()'"***#!	


+# +#
	
234)533=4,
§ 1203.7 Samples for testing. ( a ) *General.* Helmets shall be tested in the condition in which they are offered for sale. To meet the standard, the helmets must be able to pass all tests, both with and without any attachments that may be offered by the helmet's manufacturer and with all possible combinations of such attachments.
( b ) *Number of samples.* To test conformance to this standard, eight samples of each helmet size for each helmet model offered for sale are required.
§ 171.26 Answering brief. ( a ) *Time for filing answering brief.* Within thirty days after service of the appeal brief, the National Futures Association shall file with the Proceedings Clerk an answering brief.
( b ) *Contents of answering brief.* The contents of the answering brief generally shall be consistent with those set forth in § 171.25(b) but may omit a statement of the issues and a statement of the case if the National Futures Association does not dispute the issues or the statement of the case contained in the appeal brief.
( c ) *Length of the answering brief.* Without prior leave of the Commission, the answering brief may not exceed thirty five pages, exclusive of any table of contents, table of cases, index and appendix containing transcripts of testimony, exhibits, statutes, rules, regulations or similar materials.
### §14044h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14044h was editorially reclassified as section 20711 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-15-0163:  Proposed Revisions to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enforcement Policy

Accession Number: ML15229A097

Date Released: Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15229A093 - SECY-15-0163:  Proposed Revisions to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enforcement Policy (6 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15229A087 - SECY-15-0163:  Enclosure 1 - Proposed Enforcement Policy Revisions (15 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15229A096 - SECY-15-0163:  Enclosure 2- 2-Year Lookback (6 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15229A080 - SECY-15-0163: Enclosure 3- Public Comment and Staff Responses (16 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15229A084 - SECY-15-0163: Enclosure 4 - Federal Register Notice: Proposed Revisions to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enforcement Policy (27 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15229A083 - SECY-15-0163:  Enclosure 5 - Enforcement Policy Revisions (Track Changes) (114 page(s), 12/13/2015)
    - ML15251A062 - SECY-15-0163: Enclosure 6 - Clean Revised Enforcement Policy (114 page(s), 12/13/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
No: II-16-015 April 5, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Agency’s 

2015 Assessment of Surry Nuclear Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled an open house for Tuesday, April 12 to 

provide information on the agency’s assessment of the Surry nuclear plant’s two units during 2015.

The plant, which is operated by Dominion, is located near Surry, Va., 17 miles northwest of 

Newport News.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 5 - 6 p.m. in the 

lobby of the General District Courtroom, Surry Government Center, 45 School St. in Surry.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions about the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Surry plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Surry and other 

nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual 

meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to learn 

about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing the 2015 Surry plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant.

The NRC review of the Surry plant for 2015 concluded that it operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will 

continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year all nuclear power plants 

receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Surry were green in 2015. 

Current performance information for both Surry Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight, is available on the NRC website.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgewater Foods International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Saunders, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: July 16, 2007



/s/  Robert Saunders

Robert Saunders,

Chief Executive Officer
#### § 901.1 Cross-reference.

The rules formerly at 16 CFR part 901 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR part 1006, “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F).”
#### § 301.18 Passing off domestic furs as imported furs prohibited.

No domestic furs nor fur products shall be labeled, invoiced or advertised in such a manner as to represent directly or by implication that they have been imported.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2006
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0923 Directorate ID: 2009-SW-20-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, B1, B2, B3, BA, and D; and AS355E, F, 

F1, F2, and N Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 791 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: Cracks have been discovered in the spar of the upper fin; modifying the upper and lower 

fin attachment is intended to prevent failure of a spar, loss of a fin, and a separated fin hitting a 

rotor.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $453

Labor per Helicopter

(4 x $85/work-hour)

$340

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $793

Total US Fleet Cost $627,263

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Jim Grigg
### §15702. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Director

The term "Director" means the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

#### (2) Lifelines

The term "lifelines" means public works and utilities, including transportation facilities and infrastructure, oil and gas pipelines, electrical power and communication facilities and infrastructure, and water supply and sewage treatment facilities.

#### (3) Program

The term "Program" means the National Windstorm Impact Reduction Program established by section 15703(a) of this title.

#### (4) State

The term "State" means each of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

#### (5) Windstorm

The term "windstorm" means any storm with a damaging or destructive wind component, such as a hurricane, tropical storm, northeaster, tornado, or thunderstorm.

(Pub. L. 108–360, title II, §203, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1676; Pub. L. 114–52, §2, Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 496.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 108–360, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1675, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15701 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2015—Par. (1). Pub. L. 114–52, §2(a), substituted "Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 114–52, §2(b)(2), added par. (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).

Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 114–52, §2(b)(1), redesignated pars. (2) and (3) as (3) and (4), respectively. Former par. (4) redesignated (5).

Par. (5). Pub. L. 114–52, §2(b)(1), (c), redesignated par. (4) as (5) and inserted "northeaster," after "tropical storm,".
### §12751. Private-public partnership

Each participating jurisdiction shall make all reasonable efforts, consistent with the purposes of this subchapter, to maximize participation by the private sector, including nonprofit organizations and for-profit entities, in the implementation of the jurisdiction's housing strategy, including participation in the financing, development, rehabilitation and management of affordable housing. Nothing in the previous sentence shall preclude public housing authorities from fully participating in the implementation of a jurisdiction's housing strategy.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §221, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4112.)
§ 1513.6 Instructions. Instructions shall accompany each bunk bed set, and shall include the following information. ( a ) *Size of mattress and foundation.* The length and width of the intended mattress and foundation shall be clearly stated, either numerically or in conventional terms such as twin size, twin extra-long, etc. In addition, the maximum thickness of the mattress and foundation required for compliance with § 1513.3 (a)(5) and (b)(1) of this part shall be stated.
( b ) *Safety warnings.* The instructions shall provide the following safety warnings: ( 1 ) Do not allow children under 6 years of age to use the upper bunk.
( 2 ) Use guardrails on both sides of the upper bunk.
( 3 ) Prohibit horseplay on or under beds.
( 4 ) Prohibit more than one person on upper bunk.
( 5 ) Use ladder for entering or leaving upper bunk.
( 6 ) If the bunk bed will be placed next to a wall, the guardrail that runs the full length of the bed should be placed against the wall to prevent entrapment between the bed and the wall. (This applies only to bunk beds without two full-length guardrails.)
I. Date: June 24, 2009 

II. Subject: Meeting with Industry Representatives and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and 

Program Division, Metals and Minerals Group 

III.Location: EPA Campus, RTP, North Carolina 

IV.Attendees: 

EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

Steve Fruh 

Chuck French 

Tom Driscoll 

Robin Segall 

Jason DeWees 

 Gold Mine Industry Representatives

 Joe Beetler, Newmont Mining Corporation 

 Greg Schoen, Round Mountain Gold Corporation 

 Andy Cole, Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. 

 Kevin Lewis, Air Sciences Inc. 

 John Barber, Marigold 

 RTI International

 Marvin Branscome 

 Gabrielle Raymond 

V. Discussion Items: 

• The industry and EPA representatives discussed the general gold production processes, 

especially as they relate to cyanide use and emissions, including process flow diagrams 

and sources/points/places of emissions. 

• Discussed the existing data and calculations for cyanide emissions that had been 

performed previously by the gold mine facilities. 

• Discussed potential methods, approaches, and plans that could possibly be used to gather 

additional cyanide fugitive emissions test data in the near future. These included flux 

box testing of open area sources, stack testing for HCN, and fence line monitoring for 

HCN. 

• There was also a discussion of performing emission tests for other non-mercury HAPs 

(e.g., other HAP metals), test methods (Method 29), and what data for multi-metals might 

already be available. 
• The industry representatives agreed to perform additional HCN and multi-metals testing. 

Next steps include developing quality assurance and test plans and the review and 

approval process. 

AGENDA (6/24/2009) 

Mercury Emissions from Gold Mine Ore Processing Facilities 

Meeting with Industry Representatives and U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Program Division, 

Metals and Minerals Group 

Date: June 24, 2009 

Location: EPA Campus, RTP, North Carolina 

1. Discuss the general gold production processes, especially as relates to cyanide use and 

emissions, including process flow diagrams and sources/points/places of emissions, etc. 

2. Discuss the existing data and calculations for cyanide emissions. 

3. Potential methods, approaches, and plans that could possibly be used to gather additional 

cyanide fugitive emissions test data in the near future (e.g., maybe over the next 4-6 months). 

4. Emissions of other non-mercury HAPs (e.g., other heavy metals) and available data, test 

methods, etc.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Nova Fabrics Corp., Respondent, and Buenaventura Foreign Trade Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 937.]
#### § 6.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 6.150, no qualified individuals with handicaps shall, because the Commission's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Commission.
No: 15-010 March 2, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200 

NRC’s Gabriel Taylor Honored as a Federal Engineer of the Year

Gabriel Taylor, a senior fire protection engineer at the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, has been chosen by the National Society of 

Professional Engineers as one of the top 19 professional engineers in 

the federal government. Taylor received the honor Feb. 26 at a 

ceremony at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

Taylor works in the fire research branch in the NRC’s Office 

of Nuclear Regulatory Research. He was recognized for exceptional 

contributions to the NRC’s safety mission and advancing the state-ofthe-art knowledge of fire safety at nuclear power plants. Taylor was 

nominated by his branch chief, Mark Henry Salley, and Patrick 

Madden, deputy director of the Division of Risk Analysis. In their 

nomination, they credited Taylor’s work related to the effects of fireinduced failures on safety-related electrical systems. This work included organizing and leading a series 

of experiments and expert panels and effectively communicating the research findings. He was also 

cited for leading an engineering team in investigating the performance of very early warning fire 

detection systems under various conditions and analyzing their potential for increasing fire safety. 

Federal agencies employing at least 50 engineers may nominate candidates for the Federal 

Engineer of the Year award. Top candidates are honored each year and the society names a single 

winner at the ceremony. Last year, David Stroup, another senior fire protection engineer in Taylor’s 

branch, was also honored with the award.

Taylor has a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Pennsylvania State University and 

a master’s degree in fire protection engineering from the University of Maryland.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 11, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00534-CV

JASON FRANCIS, Appellant

V.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., BANK 

OF AMERICA, N.A. AND WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF MORGAN 

STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC., TRUST 2005-WMC, MORTGAGE 

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-WMC6, Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-71266

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 17, 2013. On January 16, 2014, 

appellant was ordered to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record in 

this appeal on or before January 31, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
2

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
### §10264. Investigatory powers

#### (a) Hearings

Upon request of the Chairman or a majority of the members of the Board, the Board may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence, as the Board considers appropriate. Any member of the Board may administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses appearing before the Board.

#### (b) Production of documents

(1) Upon the request of the Chairman or a majority of the members of the Board, and subject to existing law, the Secretary (or any contractor of the Secretary) shall provide the Board with such records, files, papers, data, or information as may be necessary to respond to any inquiry of the Board under this subchapter.

(2) Subject to existing law, information obtainable under paragraph (1) shall not be limited to final work products of the Secretary, but shall include drafts of such products and documentation of work in progress.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5051, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–249.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Davis, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 793]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered on or about September 27, 2005, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant *743may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.