alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Lance K. Bradford, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,the sole Manager of Vestin Fund III, LLC, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vestin Fund III, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Fund III, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin FundIII, LLC and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinFund III, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-4798;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund III, LLC’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Fund III, LLC’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affectVestin Fund III, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Fund III, LLC’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Fund III, LLC’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Fund III,LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. BradfordChief Financial Officer*Vestin Mortgage, Inc., soleManager of Vestin Fund III, LLC
* Lance K. Bradford functions as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officerof the registrant
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-18-0003: Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activity and Denial of Petition for Rulemaking - Requirement to Submit Complete and Accurate Information (Docket No. PRM-50-107; NRC-2013-0077)

Accession Number: ML16277A058

Date Released: Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16277A064 - SECY-18-0003: Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activity and Denial of Petition for Rulemaking - Requirement to Submit Complete and Accurate Information (Docket No. PRM-50-107; NRC-2013-0077) (5 page(s), 1/10/2018)
    - ML16277A154 - SECY-18-0003: Enclosure 1 - Draft Federal Register Notice: Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activity and Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-107 -  Requirement to Submit Complete and Accurate Information. (9 page(s), 1/10/2018)
    - ML16277A181 - SECY-18-0003: Enclosure 2 - Draft Letter to Petitioner J. Lieberman RE:  Discontinuation of Rulemaking Activity and Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-50-107) RE:  Requirement to Submit Complete and Accurate Information (2 page(s), 1/10/2018)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §14943. Authorization of appropriations; collection of fees

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to agencies of the Federal Government implementing the Convention and the provisions of this chapter.

#### (2) Availability of funds

Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) are authorized to remain available until expended.

#### (b) Assessment of fees

(1) The Secretary may charge a fee for new or enhanced services that will be undertaken by the Department of State to meet the requirements of this chapter with respect to intercountry adoptions under the Convention and comparable services with respect to other intercountry adoptions. Such fee shall be prescribed by regulation and shall not exceed the cost of such services.

(2) Fees collected under paragraph (1) shall be retained and deposited as an offsetting collection to any Department of State appropriation to recover the costs of providing such services. Such fees shall remain available for obligation until expended.

(Pub. L. 106–279, title IV, §403, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 841; Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §211(a), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1365; Pub. L. 112–276, §3(a), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–279, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 825, known as the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14901 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–276 struck out subsec. (c). Text read as follows: "No funds collected under the authority of this section may be made available to an accrediting entity to carry out the purposes of this chapter."

2002—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 107–228, §211(a)(1), inserted "Such fees shall remain available for obligation until expended." at end.

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 107–228, §211(a)(2), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: "Fees authorized under this section shall be available for obligation only to the extent and in the amount provided in advance in appropriations Acts."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 6, 2000, with transition rule, see section 505(a)(1), (b) of Pub. L. 106–279, set out as an Effective Dates; Transition Rule note under section 14901 of this title.
No: I-14-004 February 3, 2014 

 CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Begins Special Inspection 

At Millstone Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a Special Inspection at the Millstone Unit 3 

nuclear power plant to further review repetitive problems involving a pump that is part of a reactor 

safety system. The inspection will get under way today (Feb. 3) at the plant, which is located in 

Waterford, Conn., and operated by Dominion Nuclear Connecticut Inc. 

The inspection, to be conducted by a four-member team, will focus on a turbine-driven auxiliary 

feedwater pump for the plant. The auxiliary, or back-up, feedwater system is one of several that can be 

used to help cool down the reactor following a shutdown by pumping water into the secondary side of 

the plant’s steam generators. The steam generators are essentially large heat exchangers that convert 

heat produced by the reactor into steam, which in turn is used to spin the plant’s turbine and generate 

electricity. 

Among the areas to be reviewed during the Special Inspection are Dominion’s responses to the 

issues, including the adequacy and completeness of testing on the pump and root-cause evaluations of 

the problems. It will expand on earlier assessments performed by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned 

to Millstone on a full-time basis and by NRC specialist inspectors. 

“We have witnessed problems involving this safety-related component stretching back to last 

May,” NRC Region I Administrator Bill Dean said. “The fact that these issues occurred on multiple 

occasions despite repeated efforts to repair this component has prompted us to take a closer look at the

situation.” 

On May 15, 2013, at the end of a refueling and maintenance outage, plant personnel observed 

that the turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump was experiencing speed oscillations, or unexpected 

fluctuations, during testing. There were also problems involving the pump on several other dates, most 

recently on Jan. 23, 2014. The issues included oscillations and overspeeding. 

NRC Resident Inspectors at Millstone have been closely following up on these issues with 

support from Region I specialist inspectors and other technical experts. For example, the third-quarter 

integrated inspection report for the plant includes a finding for an inadequate operability determination 

by the company related to the performance of the speedcontroller for the pump. 

The inspection team will document its findings and conclusions in a report to be issued within 

45 days of the end of the review.
§ 502.3 Prohibited acts. ( a ) No person engaged in the packaging or labeling of any consumer commodity for distribution in commerce, and no person (other than a common carrier for hire, a contract carrier for hire, or a freight forwarder for hire) engaged in the distribution in commerce of any packaged or labeled consumer commodity, shall distribute or cause to be distributed in commerce any such commodity if such commodity is contained in a package, or if there is affixed to that commodity a label, which does not conform to the provisions of the Act and of the regulations in this part.
( b ) Persons engaged in business as wholesale or retail distributors of consumer commodities shall be subject to the Act and the regulations in this part to the extent that such persons are engaged in the packaging or labeling of consumer commodities, or prescribe or specify by any means the manner in which such consumer commodities are packaged or labeled.
Dismissed; Opinion Filed October 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00649-CV

DAVNA NICOLE POWELL, Appellant

V.

ANTHONY PROVOST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV19-00063

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell

By postcard dated September 25, 2019, we directed appellant to file her brief within ten 

days and cautioned that failure to do so could result in dismissal of the appeal without further 

notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c). To date, appellant has not complied. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

190649F.P05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVNA NICOLE POWELL, Appellant

No. 05-19-00649-CV V.

ANTHONY PROVOST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV19-00063.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, 

Justices Myers and Osborne participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Anthony Provost recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Davna Nicole Powell.

Judgment entered this 21st day of October, 2019.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.1 General statement and statutory authority. The Securities and Exchange Commission was created in 1934 under the Securities Exchange Act. That Act transferred to the Commission the administration of the Securities Act of 1933, formerly administered by the Federal Trade Commission. Subsequent laws assigned to the Securities and Exchange Commission for administration are: Trust Indenture Act of 1939, Investment Company Act of 1940, and Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In addition, under the Bankruptcy Code, the Commission is a statutory party in cases arising under chapters 9 and 11. Considered together, the laws administered by the Commission provided for the following. ( a ) Public disclosure of pertinent facts concerning public offerings of securities and securities listed on national securities exchanges and certain securities traded in the over-the-counter markets.
( b ) Enforcement of disclosure requirements in the soliciting of proxies for meetings of security holders by companies whose securities are registered pursuant to section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and their subsidiaries and investment companies.
( c ) Regulation of the trading in securities on national securities exchanges and in the over-the-counter markets.
( d ) Investigation of securities frauds, manipulations, and other violations, and the imposition and enforcement of legal sanctions therefor.
( e ) Registration, and the regulation of certain activities, of brokers, dealers and investment advisers.
( f ) Supervision of the activities of mutual funds and other investment companies.
( g ) Administration of statutory standards governing protective and other provisions of trust indentures under which debt securities are sold to the public.
( h ) Protection of the interests of public investors involved in bankruptcy reorganization cases and in bankruptcy cases involving the adjustment of debts of a municipality.
( i ) Administrative sanctions, injunctive remedies, civil money penalties and criminal prosecution. There are also private rights of action for investors injured by violations of the Acts.
[27 FR 12712, Dec. 22, 1962, as amended at 43 FR 13375, Mar. 30, 1978; 49 FR 12684, Mar. 30, 1984; 60 FR 14623, Mar. 20, 1995; 60 FR 32794, June 23, 1995; 76 FR 71874, Nov. 21, 2011]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ernest S. Fowler, Respondent, against R. J. Miller et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The employer and insurance carrier contend that subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law is applicable and that the Special Fund should be required to reimburse the appellants for all benefits subsequent to those payable for the first 104 weeks of disability. The evidence supports the decision of the board rejecting this contention. The board found, upon the basis of *791substantial evidence, that the accident suffered by the claimant on October 2, 1944, left no impairment preventing him from doing his regular work and that *“*Any alleged condition of disability which he may have had was not known to, nor considered by the employer ” in continuing the claimant in his employ. Therefore, at the time of the accident, on July 9, 1945, on account of which the award was made, the employer was solely liable, and had no right to reimbursement from the Special Fund *(Matter of Zyla*v. *Juilliard & Go.,*277 App. Div. 604). Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
#### Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant in Error, v. Wadeford Electric Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,698.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James C. Maktin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 8, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Aetna Life Insurance Company, plaintiff, against Wadeford Electric Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover premiums alleged to be due under certain policies of liability insurance issued at the special instance and request of defendant.

*607Abstract of the Decision.

1. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, § *27*
      ***
      *—when motions and orders not reviewable.*Motions and ordprs striking affidavits of defense from the files cannot he reviewed on a writ of error unless they are preserved by a bill of exceptions.

2. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, § *26*—when matters not preserved in record not reviewable.*On a writ of error to reverse a judgment in an action to recover premiums alleged to be due under insurance policies, where the policies are not preserved in the record, the court cannot consider their provisions.

Defendant’s affidavit of defense was struck from the files, as was also its amended affidavit of defense. No propositions of law were submitted.

To reverse judgment for plaintiff for $82.22 entered on his affidavit of claim, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

Daniel M. Mickey, for plaintiff in error.

Frederick K. Warne, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
Subpart 524.1 - Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: Part 524 - Protection of Privacy and Freedom of Information

524.103 Procedures.

(a) See 41 CFR 105-64, GSA Order CIO 2201.1, Privacy Act Program, and Privacy Act Program

information available on Insite, when contracting for the design, development, or operation of a

system of records on individuals.

(b) The Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer (OCAO) will review every two years a random sample

of contracts that provide for the maintenance of a system of records pursuant to OMB Circular

A-130, Appendix 1.
#### § 1401.2 Purpose.

Chlorofluorocarbons are used as propellants in self-pressurized containers of a variety of products subject to the Commission's jurisdiction. Scientific research has indicated that chlorofluorocarbons may pose a risk of depletion of ozone in the stratosphere. The stratospheric ozone shield is of great importance in protecting life on earth from shortwave ultra-violet rays of the sun. Ozone depletion allows more of these rays to reach the earth, and the consequences include a possibility of a significant increase in human skin cancer and other effects of unknown magnitude on man, animals, and plants. Chlorofluorocarbon release may also cause climatic change, both by reducing stratospheric ozone and by increasing infrared absorption in the atmosphere. The Commission believes that the requirements of this part 1401 will enable consumers to make a conscious choice of whether to use products that contain chlorofluorocarbon propellants. The Commission also believes that these requirements are necessary in order to carry out the purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Act of (a) helping to protect the public against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products and (b) assisting consumers in evaluating the comparative safety of consumer products.
#### § 2.12 [Reserved]
### §3706. Limitations, variations, tolerances, and exemptions

The Secretary of Labor may provide reasonable limitations to, and may prescribe regulations allowing reasonable variations to, tolerances from, and exemptions from, this chapter that the Secretary may find necessary and proper in the public interest to prevent injustice or undue hardship or to avoid serious impairment of the conduct of Federal Government business.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1174.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3706 | 40:331. | Pub. L. 87–581, title I, §105, Aug. 13, 1962, 76 Stat. 359. |

Section
### §15609. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15609 was editorially reclassified as section 30309 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Newton D. Bartle, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Westerlea Builders, Inc., Appellant, v. Home Owners Cooperative, Inc., Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Van Duser, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 1113.]
### §14171. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14171 was editorially reclassified as section 12611 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Order entered February 2 8, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 00715
- CR
ADRIAN V . BARRERA , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F07
- 30801
- P 

### O RDER On February 8, 2013, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. In response, the District Clerk fi led a supplemental clerk’s record containing a letter stating that the office “is not able to comply with the [C]ourt’s order” because it is not in possession of the certification. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appella nt’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court’s proceedings and to deliver the certification for filing with this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the following:

• Honora ble Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court;• Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk;

• Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division; and

• Counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

 41

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●