alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3955 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Blue 187. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Reactive Blue 187. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 187. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3955 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Reactive Blue 187, (Pyridinium, 1,1’-[(6,13-dichloro4,11-disulfo-3,10- 

triphenodioxazinediyl)bis[imino-2,1- 

ethanediylimino[6-[(2,5- 

disulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5- 

triazine-4,2-diyl]]]bis[3- 

carboxy-, bis(inner salt), sodium salt (1:6)) (CAS No. 

79771–28–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.16.30) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
J~ \jEO sr,qT

~ ,s

~ 2 

# o z Q

o = 4 4 PROS'
~

-G ~ ` UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460


# OCT 0 2 2014 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION


### Chris Martin Holland Applied Technologies 7050 High Grove Blvd. Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527 Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for Methylal in Foam Blowing. Dear Mr. Martin: 

### Thank you for Holland Applied Technologies' submission to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program to implement section 612 of the Clean Air Act. Your submission and the additional information received have been reviewed for completeness. We have found the information to be complete. Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: Substitute name: Methylal 

### Sector: Foam Blowing End-uses: [ Date received: April 18, 2014 Date of most recent information received: August 15, 2014 Status of submission: Complete Your submission was complete as of August 15, 2014. EPA has 90 days from this date to render a decision about the acceptability of inethylal in the specified end-uses. You may sell or import methylal for use in the foam blowing end-uses described above as of November 13, 2014.

Internet Address (URL) • http //www.epa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### EPA's SNAP listings are end use by end use. Therefore, we request that you withdraw in writing

your claims of confidential business information on the end-uses that you have requested for review. If you have questions about your submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9624 or Wozniak. 7e t rald ~ epa. gov 

### . 

### Sincerely, 

# /

, 

# X`~ 

# &,--- Gerald Wozniak Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch Stratospheric Protection Division Cc: 

### Ms. Angelina Duggan Exponent, Inc 1150 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20036
#### Emmette A. Ellis v. Max Hahn.

Decided May 7, 1902.

1. —Innocent Purchaser—Nonnegotiable Instrument.

Plaintiff can not be protected as an innocent purchaser of notes sued on against the plea of defendant to rescind the sale on which they were given for misrepresentations, where the record fails to show that the notes were made payable to order or bearer.

2. —Sale—Rescission—Misrepresentation—Written Contract.

The vendee may- have rescission of a contract of sale induced by false rep-representations by the vendor of the capacity of the machinery sold to furnish power, though the written warranty was different from the representations and was not broken; and the representations may be proved by paroi.

Appeal from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Ed. S. Lauderdale.

Ellis sued as assignee of notes given by Hahn to the Sutton Steel Electrical Manufacturing Company on the purchase of certain machinery. *396Defendant plead misrepresentations as to the amount of power the machinery would furnish. The judgment awarded a rescission of the contract and return of the property on both sides.

*Wharton & Young,*for appellant.

KEY, Associate Justice.

After due consideration, our conclusion is that no reversible error is shown. According to the record the question of appellant’s right to protection as a bona fide holder of negotiable paper is not in the ease. While it is shown that he acquired the notes before maturity and for a valuable consideration, it is not shown that they were negotiable instruments. The statement of facts recites that the notes were executed “by Max Hahn in favor of the Sutton Steel Electrical Manufacturing Company,” and were indorsed by that company without recourse. It is not shown that they were payable to the order of the company or to bearer, or that other language of like import was incorporated in them. The rule is well settled that some such language is essential to render a written instrument negotiable paper in the sense which entitles a holder to protection as an innocent purchaser. 16 Am: and Eng. Enc. of Law, 1 ed., 479; Tied, on Com. Paper, secs. 6, *21.*

The testimony complained of was admissible, and no error of which appellant can complain was committed in giving and refusing instructions.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
#### § 171.24 Submission of the record.

Within thirty days after service of a notice of appeal, the National Futures Association shall file with the Proceedings Clerk two copies of the record of the proceeding (as defined by § 171.2(k)). The record shall be bound as a unit, chronologically indexed and tabbed, and certified as correct by a duly authorized official, agent or employee of the National Futures Asssociation. The National Futures Association shall serve on the party appealing, in lieu of the record, a copy of the index of the record and a copy of any document in the record not previously served on the party appealing. If the party appealing objects to the materials included or excluded in preparing the record, he shall file his objections with his brief on appeal. The Commission may, at any time, direct that an omission or misstatement be corrected and, if necessary, that a supplemental record be prepared and filed.
110 STAT. 3810 PUBLIC LAW 104–306—OCT. 14, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4083:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–814 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Sept. 24, considered and passed House.

Oct. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–306

104th Congress

An Act

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act through

September 30, 1997.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amended—

(1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246) to read as

follows:

‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal

year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to implement this part.’’;

(2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking ‘‘June 30,

1996’’ both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof

‘‘September 30, 1997’’;

(3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42 U.S.C.

6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal

year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to carry out this

part.’’; and

(4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking ‘‘June 30,

1996’’ both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof

‘‘September 30, 1997’’.

Approved October 14, 1996.

Oct. 14, 1996

[H.R. 4083]
#### § 10.64 Public hearings.

All hearings shall be public, except that upon application of a respondent or affected witness the Administrative Law Judge may direct that specific documents or testimony be received and retained non-publicly in order to prevent unwarranted disclosure of trade secrets or sensitive commercial or financial information or an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
### §1397m–3. Provision of information regarding, and evaluations of, elder justice programs

#### (a) Provision of information

To be eligible to receive a grant under this part, an applicant shall agree—

(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), to provide the eligible entity conducting an evaluation under subsection (b) of the activities funded through the grant with such information as the eligible entity may require in order to conduct such evaluation; or

(2) in the case of an applicant for a grant under section 1397m(b) of this title, to provide the Secretary with such information as the Secretary may require to conduct an evaluation or audit under subsection (c).

#### (b) Use of eligible entities to conduct evaluations

#### (1) Evaluations required

Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall—

(A) reserve a portion (not less than 2 percent) of the funds appropriated with respect to each program carried out under this part; and

(B) use the funds reserved under subparagraph (A) to provide assistance to eligible entities to conduct evaluations of the activities funded under each program carried out under this part.

#### (2) Certified EHR technology grant program not included

The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the certified EHR technology grant program under section 1397m(b) of this title.

#### (3) Authorized activities

A recipient of assistance described in paragraph (1)(B) shall use the funds made available through the assistance to conduct a validated evaluation of the effectiveness of the activities funded under a program carried out under this part.

#### (4) Applications

To be eligible to receive assistance under paragraph (1)(B), an entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, including a proposal for the evaluation.

#### (5) Reports

Not later than a date specified by the Secretary, an eligible entity receiving assistance under paragraph (1)(B) shall submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report containing the results of the evaluation conducted using such assistance together with such recommendations as the entity determines to be appropriate.

#### (c) Evaluations and audits of certified EHR technology grant program by the Secretary

#### (1) Evaluations

The Secretary shall conduct an evaluation of the activities funded under the certified EHR technology grant program under section 1397m(b) of this title. Such evaluation shall include an evaluation of whether the funding provided under the grant is expended only for the purposes for which it is made.

#### (2) Audits

The Secretary shall conduct appropriate audits of grants made under section 1397m(b) of this title.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2044, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, §6703(a)(1)(C), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 796.)
March 4, 2015

-Ms. Molly Smith Office of A**vi~tio~** Policy and Plans Federal Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAve,SW Washington, DC 20591 One Battery Park Plaza New York, NY "10004-"1479 T 2i 2 493 7400 F 2i 2 344 3344 www.pfnyc.org


## ·····••••····· 

# ............... 

# ·····••••····· ·····•••······ PARTNERSHIP •••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••**·::::!~i!!i.~:::·** 

## for New York City

....**~.~~~~!~~:.!.···**

Re: Docket No. FAA-2014-1073, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Slot Management and Transparency for**LaGuardi~** Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airportr and Newark Liberty International Airport Dear Ms. Smith: On behalf of The Partnership for New York City, I am writing to request an extension of the comment period for the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Notice of Proposed Rt.tlemaking (NPRM) related to Slot Managementand Transparency for LaGuardia Airport, John 

### F. Kehned,)dntemational Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport. The Partnership for New York City represents the city's largest private sector employers, all of whomhighly dependonthe named airports for goods and personnel movement. Webelieve that given the proposal's length, complexity of issues within, and industry feedback required, an extension is essential in order for those impacted to offer substantive and comprehensive feedback. The currentdeadlinefor submittingcomments is AprilS, 2015. We respectfullyrequest that this be extendedby 60 days to June 8, 2015. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, 

### '

.**··~**

•**-~** :- 1 ' 1 ...., "'( .... ? \
§ 22.5 Futures commission merchants and derivatives clearing organizations: Written acknowledgement. ( a ) Before depositing Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral, the futures commission merchant or derivatives clearing organization shall obtain and retain in its files a separate written acknowledgement letter from each depository in accordance with §§ 1.20 and 1.26 of this chapter, with all references to “Futures Customer Funds” modified to apply to Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral, and with all references to section 4d(a) or 4d(b) of the Act and the regulations thereunder modified to apply to section 4d(f) of the Act and the regulations thereunder.
( b ) The futures commission merchant or derivatives clearing organization shall adhere to all requirements specified in §§ 1.20 and 1.26 of this chapter regarding retaining, permitting access to, filing, or amending the written acknowledgement letter, in all cases as if the Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral comprised Futures Customer Funds subject to segregation pursuant to section 4d(a) or 4d(b) of the Act and the regulations thereunder.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, an acknowledgement letter need not be obtained from a derivatives clearing organization that has made effective, pursuant to section 5c(c) of the Act and the regulations thereunder, rules that provide for the segregation of Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral, in accordance with all relevant provisions of the Act and the regulations thereunder.
[77 FR 6371, Feb. 7, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 66334, Nov. 2, 2012]
[Civil No. 339.]

#### R. E. FARRINGTON, Appellant, v. BYRON JACKSON, Appellee.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa.

C. F. Ainsworth, for Appellee.

January 21, 1892.

Affirmed.
### §14331. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to phase out the use of batteries containing mercury.

(Pub. L. 104–142, title II, §202, May 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 1336.)
§ 437.2 The obligation to furnish written documents. In connection with the offer for sale, sale, or promotion of a business opportunity, it is a violation of this Rule and an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”) for any seller to fail to furnish a prospective purchaser with the material information required by §§ 437.3(a) and 437.4(a) of this part in writing at least seven calendar days before the earlier of the time that the prospective purchaser: ( a ) Signs any contract in connection with the business opportunity sale; or
( b ) Makes a payment or provides other consideration to the seller, directly or indirectly through a third party.
#### Anthony Panepinto, Respondent, v. A. A. Grinnell Company, Inc., Appellant.

All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for reformation of a contract.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1019.]
§ 229.505 (Item 505) Determination of offering price. ( a ) *Common equity.* Where common equity is being registered for which there is no established public trading market for purposes of paragraph (a) of Item 201 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.201(a)) or where there is a material disparity between the offering price of the common equity being registered and the market price of outstanding shares of the same class, describe the various factors considered in determining such offering price.
( b ) *Warrants, rights and convertible securities.* Where warrants, rights or convertible securities exercisable for common equity for which there is no established public trading market for purposes of paragraph (a) of Item 201 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.201(a)) are being registered, describe the various factors considered in determining their exercise or conversion price.