alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.R. Brooks Sherman, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 6, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,

acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written

statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished

to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# 5334.7002 Policy

(d)(4) See MP5301.601(a)(i).          

**Parent topic:**Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
#### Adela Filipowicz, an Infant, etc., by Mary Filipowicz, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. American Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

From plaintiff’s testimony, confirmed by that of her mother, the jury were warranted in finding that she had been employed in defendant’s factory when under the age of fifteen and without the “ employment certificate ” required by sections 70 and 71 of the Labor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 31). * Although testimony was given to the effect that she had then represented herself as seventeen, we cannot say that such evidence was so strong and convincing as to require the jury to accept it against plaintiff’s denials. It was not disputed that after five months duty as a doffer girl, which involves merely lifting off the filled spools and placing others on the machine, the plaintiff was directed to run the machine herself without instruction as to its working or any warnings against the dangers of picking out jute from the moving cog wheels or compression rollers, by which attempt she lost part of the right index finger. The printed notices posted against employees repairing machines in motion or putting their hands on rollers in motion were properly before the jury but were not controlling. We find no error in the rulings or charge of the court. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present—Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

*

 See Consol. Laws, chap. 31 (Laws of 1909, chap. 36), §§ 70, 71, as respectively amd. by Laws of 1913, chap. 529, and Laws of 1912, chap. 333.— [Rep.
#### § 201.54 Settlement.

The applicant and counsel for the Office or Division of the Commission may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with the Commission's standard settlement procedure. See 17 CFR 201.240. If a prevailing party and counsel for the Office or Division of the Commission agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement. If a proposed settlement provides that each side shall bear its own expenses, and the settlement is accepted, no application may be filed.

[54 FR 53052, Dec. 27, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 32795, June 23, 1995]
### §14113. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14113 was editorially reclassified as section 12573 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §15096. Authorized activities

#### (a) In general

A State that receives a grant under section 15093 of this title shall use the funds made available through the grant to carry out systems change activities that accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Special rule

In carrying out activities authorized under this subchapter, a State shall ensure that such activities address the needs of families of children with disabilities from unserved or underserved populations.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title II, §207, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1732.)
Board Coverage Decision

2010-43

American Train Dispatchers Association AFL-CIO 

and TTD-Rail Division

Name Change - Effective January 1 2004

American Train Dispatchers Association AFL-CIO 

and TTD-Rail Division

has changed its name to

American Train Dispatchers Association

No Decision Published

BA # 8905
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Richard Achron, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of North American Natural Gas, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in the SEC Release No. 33-8238

c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:

July 7, 2004

By:

/s/ Richard Achron



Richard Achron, Principal Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30752

Summary Calendar

JUAN P. VERRETTE,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHARLES CODY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:07-CV-547

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Cody, Louisiana prisoner # 101450, appeals the district court’s

judgment finding him 60% at fault for causing Juan P. Verrette’s, Louisiana

prisoner # 128135, injuries and awarding damages of $75,000 for pain and

suffering. Cody contends that it was unfair to assign him damages and hold him

more at fault than Verrette since Verrette initiated the confrontation and prison

norms demanded that Cody respond.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 4, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-30752 Document: 00512100857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2013
No. 11-30752

The allocation of fault and assessment of damages are factual findings

reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Hernandez v. M/V Rajaan, 841

F.2d 582, 587 (5th Cir. 1988) (damages);Transorient Navigators Co., S.A. v. M/S

Southwind, 788 F.2d 288, 291 (5th Cir. 1986) (fault). A factual finding is not

clearly erroneous so long as it is “plausible in light of the record viewed in its

entirety.” Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, N.C., 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985).

From the evidence, the district court could plausibly find that Cody

assaulted and seriously injured Verrette as Verrette was walking away. 

Therefore, the assignment of damages and a greater portion of fault to Cody was

plausible in light of the record as a whole and not clearly erroneous. See id. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 11-30752 Document: 00512100857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2013
### §11345. Disbursement of funds

Any amount made available by appropriation Acts under this subchapter shall be disbursed by the National Board before the expiration of the 3-month period beginning on the date on which such amount becomes available.

(Pub. L. 100–77, title III, §315, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 492.)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Frattaroli, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vaso Active
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

May 15, 2007

By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
   ---------------------------------
Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive ffficer)
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Report of Across America Real Estate (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, James W Creamer III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        MAY 14, 2007 /s/ James W Creamer III        James W Creamer III        Chief Financial Officer
IT’S NOT AN OPTION—

IT’S THE LAW!

Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act 

(Section 3)

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Section 3 ensures that HUD-funded jobs, training, and contracts are provided to low- and very lowincome residents of the community where the funds are spent, and to 

businesses that are owned by, or employ, such persons.

Visit www.hud.gov/section3 to learn more about Section 3

Flip to the other side to test your Section 3 knowledge 
Section 3 Quiz for Recipients of HUD Funding

The purpose of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act is to ensure 

that jobs, training, and contracts are provided to minorities?

T/F

Section 3 requirements only apply to Public Housing Agencies? T/F

Submitting the Section 3 Annual Summary Report (Form HUD-60002) to HUD is 

an agency’s only Section 3 responsibility? T/F

Section 3 residents and businesses do not have to be qualified for the jobs or 

contracts that they are seeking? T/F

If a construction project is funded with both HUD funding and non-HUD funding, 

Section 3 only applies to the HUD-share of the project? T/F

Public Housing Agencies, local units of government, contractors, and others are 

responsible for verifying the eligibility of Section 3 residents and businesses? T/F

To be considered a Section 3 resident a person’s household income must be less 

than 80% of the median for their area? T/F

Section 3 businesses are either owned by, or substantially employ, Section 3 

residents?

T/F

Agencies are required to award 50% of all construction contracts to Section 3 

businesses each year? T/F

Section 3 hiring requirements only apply to new hires? T/F

An employee that was laid off by a contractor before a HUD-funded contract was 

awarded cannot be considered a new hire if they are called back to work?

T/F

Hosting job fairs, career training, and professional development seminars does 

not count towards Section 3 efforts? T/F

There are no serious consequences for noncompliance with Section 3? T/F

Answer Key: 

1. False; 2. False; 3. False; 4. False; 5. False; 6. True; 7. True; 8. True; 9. False; 10. True; 11. False; 12. False; 13. False

To self-certify a firm as a Section 3 business or search the database of 

Section 3 businesses in your community, please visit: www.hud.gov/sec3biz

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

How Many of These True/False Questions Can You Answer Correctly?
#### § 1611.2 General description of products covered.

The material covered is nonrigid, unsupported, vinyl plastic film, including transparent, translucent, and opaque material, whether plain, embossed, molded or otherwise surface treated.[a]

###### Footnotes -
  1611.2

[a] Refer to sections 2 and 4 of the Flammable Fabrics Act of 1953, as amended in 1954, set out at 16 CFR part 1609 for the scope of this standard. The vinyl plastic film covered by Commercial Standard 192-53, as promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce was vinyl plastic film 10 mils and less in thickness (see § 1.3 of the voluntary standard). After CS 191-53 and CS 192-53 were made mandatory by section 4 of the act, the Federal Trade Commission clarified the scope of the standards in rules and regulations now found at §§ 1611.31(i) and 1611.33(b) (formerly 16 CFR 302.1(a)(9) and 302.3(b)).
### §15207. Consultation requirement

The Board shall consult with the Institute of Heraldry within the Department of Defense regarding the design and artistry of the Medal of Valor. The Board may also consider suggestions received by the Department of Justice regarding the design of the medal, including those made by persons not employed by the Department.

(Pub. L. 107–12, §9, May 30, 2001, 115 Stat. 22.)
### §18012. Rating reforms must apply uniformly to all health insurance issuers and group health plans

Any standard or requirement adopted by a State pursuant to this title,1 or any amendment made by this title,1 shall be applied uniformly to all health plans in each insurance market to which the standard and requirements apply. The preceding sentence shall also apply to a State standard or requirement relating to the standard or requirement required by this title 1 (or any such amendment) that is not the same as the standard or requirement but that is not preempted under section 18041(d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1252, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 162.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and transferred numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014, see section 1255 of Pub. L. 111–148, set out as a note under section 300gg of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horne International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Michael M. Megless       Michael M. Megless  Chief Financial Officer  Horne International, Inc.  November 13, 2007  
24
#### Hoffman Motor Car Co. v. Jaguar Cars North American Corp. et al.

Order appealed from modified to grant a temporary injunction until March 7, 1955, which injunction may be continued at the direction of the trial court. The case is set down for trial in Special Term, Part XI, on February 21, 1955. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, Lisa
      VanPatten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  October
              15, 2007
            
            /s/
              Lisa VanPattenLisa
              VanPattenChief
              Financial Officer