alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3517 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3517

 To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to waive the collection of passport 
 fees to replace passports that were lost, damaged, or destroyed as a 
               result of major disasters or emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2011

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to waive the collection of passport 
 fees to replace passports that were lost, damaged, or destroyed as a 
               result of major disasters or emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Recovery Assistance Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PASSPORT FEES RELATING TO EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS.

    Subsection (a) of section 1 of the Passport Act of 1920 (22 U.S.C. 
214) is amended by inserting before the last sentence the following new 
sentence: ``No passport fee shall be collected from an individual to 
replace an unexpired passport that was lost, damaged, or destroyed as a 
result of an event that resulted in the President declaring, pursuant 
to section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), that a major disaster or emergency 
exists relating to such event.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Kaidy, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ.
### §1397n–10. Website

The Federal Interagency Council on Social Impact Partnerships shall establish and maintain a public website that shall display the following:

(1) A copy of, or method of accessing, each notice published regarding a social impact partnership project pursuant to this division.

(2) A copy of each feasibility study funded under this division.

(3) For each State or local government that has entered into an agreement with the Secretary for a social impact partnership project, the website shall contain the following information:

(A) The outcome goals of the project.

(B) A description of each intervention in the project.

(C) The target population that will be served by the project.

(D) The expected social benefits to participants who receive the intervention and others who may be impacted.

(E) The detailed roles, responsibilities, and purposes of each Federal, State, or local government entity, intermediary, service provider, independent evaluator, investor, or other stakeholder.

(F) The payment terms, methodology used to calculate outcome payments, the payment schedule, and performance thresholds.

(G) The project budget.

(H) The project timeline.

(I) The project eligibility criteria.

(J) The evaluation design.

(K) The metrics used to determine whether the proposed outcomes have been achieved and how these metrics are measured.

(4) A copy of the progress reports and the final reports relating to each social impact partnership project.

(5) An estimate of the savings to the Federal, State, and local government, on a program-by-program basis and in the aggregate, resulting from the successful completion of the social impact partnership project.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2061, as added Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title VIII, §50802(2), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 281.)
§ 1500.128 Label comment. The Commission will offer informal comment on any proposed label and accompanying literature involving a hazardous substance if furnished with: ( a ) Complete labeling or proposed labeling, which may be in draft form.
( b ) Complete quantitative formula.
( c ) Adequate clinical pharmacological, toxicological, physical, and chemical data applicable to the possible hazard of the substance.
( d ) Any other information available that would facilitate preparation of a suitable label, such as complaints of injuries resulting from the product's use or other evidence that would furnish human-experience data.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1775

___________________________

Michael Dale Simpson,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FCC Forrest City Low, Medical Department; B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC

Forrest City Low; M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low; Charles

Miller, Unit Counselor, FCC Forrest City Low,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: November 26, 2015

Filed: December 21, 2015

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Michael Simpson brought this pro se action under Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), asserting

medical deliberate-indifference claims, among other claims. Simpson appeals after
the district court1

 denied his motion for a preliminary injunction, concluded that all

of his claims failed as a matter of law, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss or for

summary judgment, and entered judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. Also

pending are Simpson’s motions to “change the style of the case,” and for

reconsideration of an order entered by the clerk’s office.

Upon careful review, we first conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Simpson’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dataphase

Sys. Inc. v. C.L. Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc). We further

conclude that the district court appropriately disposed of Simpson’s claims, because,

among other reasons, the record established beyond genuine dispute that defendants

were not deliberately indifferent to Simpson’s serious medical needs. See Allard v.

Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771-72 (8th Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. In addition,

Simpson’s pending motions are denied.

 ______________________________

1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

-2-
### §14213. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14213 was editorially reclassified as section 12632 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Yami Tarsi, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2006

|/s/ Yami Tarsi
Yami TarsiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
§ 460.24 Other laws, rules, and orders. ( a ) If an outstanding FTC Cease and Desist Order applies to you but differs from the rules given here, you can petition to amend to order.
( b ) State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with, or frustrate the purposes of, the provisions of this regulation are preempted. However, a State or local government may petition the Commission, for good cause, to permit the enforcement of any part of a State or local law or regulation that would be preempted by this section.
( c ) The Commission's three-day cooling-off rule stays in force.
[44 FR 50242, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 70 FR 31276, May 31, 2005. Redesignated at 84 FR 20790, May 13, 2019]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129847 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129847 

 COA: 256496 

Wayne CC: 04-001911-01 

TONY MILLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
#### Robert Wein, an Infant, by Arthur Wein, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Harold A. Zeluck, Defendant, and Samuel Zeluck, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
§ 1209.37 Corrective actions. ( a ) *Test failure.* When any test required by § 1209.36 yields failing or unacceptable results, corrective action must be taken. Corrective action includes changes to the manufacturing process as well as reworking the insulation product itself. Corrective action may consist of equipment adjustment, equipment repair, equipment replacement, change in chemical formulation, change in chemical quantity, change in cellulosic stock, or other action deemed appropriate by the manufacturer, private labeler or importer to achieve passing or acceptable test results.
( b ) *New product.* If any corrective action required by this § 1209.37 results in a change in the product specification and a new cellulose insulation product (see § 1209.34(b)), the product specification for the new product must be recorded in accordance with § 1209.35, and qualification tests must be performed with passing or acceptable results in accordance with § 1209.34, before the new product is distributed in commerce.
Fourth Department,

November, 1916.

#### Mary E. Moore, Respondent, *v.*The Mohican Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Brie county clerk’s office on the 17th day of April, 1916, in favor of the plaintiff, and also from an order entered on the same day denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that it was the law of the case as charged by the court that plaintiff was not entitled to recover for the oily condition of defendant’s floors, -unless she satisfied the jury that there was a pool or unnecessary accumulation of oil at the place where she slipped differing in that respect from the general condition of the floor. The verdict for the plaintiff necessarily implies that there was such a pool or accumulation. We think this verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented in a memorandum.

Kruse, P. J. (dissenting):

I dissent. I think the case was submitted to the jury upon too narrow a ground, but even at that it seems to me there is evidence to sustain the verdict. It does not seem useful to send the case back simply on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence. There is abundant proof to show that the floor was not oiled in the usual way, but in a manner to make it unusually slippery, causing people to fall, as was shown by the evidence of actual occurrences. I vote for affirmance.
#### § 910.5 Severability.

If any provision of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, or stayed pending further agency action, the provision shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law and such invalidity shall not affect the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances or the validity or application of other provisions. If any provision or application of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the provision or application shall be severable from this part and shall not affect the remainder thereof.
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 70687

New source CAFOs must include an 

analysis of their potential effects on 

properties listed or eligible for listing on 

the National Register of Historic Places 

in their EIDs. If the CAFO may affect 

eligible properties, EPA will integrate 

the required section 106 consultation 

with its NEPA review.

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

Jane B. Watson, 

Acting Director, Water Quality Protection 

Division, EPA Region 6.

[FR Doc. 04–26817 Filed 12–6–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 68] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995.

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before January 6, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to 

David Rostker, Office of Management 

and Budget, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, NEOB, Room 10202, 

Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395–3897.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title and Form Number: Ex-Im Bank 

Letter of Interest Application, EIB Form 

95–9. 

OMB Number: 3048–0005. 

Need and Use: The information 

requested enables the applicant to 

provide Ex-Im Bank with the 

information necessary to determine 

eligibility for an indicative offer of 

support under the loan and guarantee 

programs. 

Affected Public: Business and other 

for-profit institutions. 

Respondents: Entities involved in the 

provision of financing or arranging of 

financing for foreign buyers of U.S. 

exports. 

Estimated Annual Respondents: 500. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 20 

Minutes. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 165. 

Frequency of Response: When 

applying for a Letter of Interest.

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

Solomon Bush, 

Agency Clearance Officer.

BILLING CODE 6690–01–M

70688 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 


EN07de04.000</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 70689


EN07de04.001</GPH>
70690 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 


EN07de04.002</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 70691


EN07de04.003</GPH>
70692 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 


EN07de04.004</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 70693


EN07de04.005</GPH>
70694 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 


EN07de04.006</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2004 / Notices 70695

[FR Doc. 04–26679 Filed 12–6–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–C


EN07de04.007</GPH>
#### Frank J. Hale v. John Cort.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### §§ 200.631-200.639 [Reserved]
#### Cecelia Owens, Appellant, v. Ulys Owens, Respondent.

In an action for separation on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment, judgment dismissing the complaint modified on the facts by striking from the second ordering paragraph the figure “$250.00”, and by inserting in lieu thereof the figure “ $600.00.” As so modified, the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The allowance of a $250 counsel fee to plaintiff was, under the circumstances herein, insufficient. *735Appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law, and from failure to find plaintiff's proposed findings of fact, dismissed, without costs. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Entropic Communications, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: September 18, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Patrick Henry                                                                
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Patrick Henry President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 8.1
 LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
 Jurisdiction of
    
    Percentage OwnershipCompany
    
    Incorporation
    
    As of December 31, 2007SPIL (B.V.I.) Holding Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100%Siliconware Investment Company Ltd.
    
    Republic of China
    
    
    100%Siliconware U.S.A. Inc.
    
    United States of America
    
    
    100%SPIL (Cayman) Holding Limited
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100%Siliconware Technology (Suzhou) Limited
    
    People's Republic of China
    
    
    100%
Searched for **https://www.selectagents.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.selectagents.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Executive Order 13362

# Designation of Additional Officers for the Department of Homeland Security Order of Succession

                        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America and pursuant to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq*., it is hereby ordered that:                    

**Section 1.**                         During any period when the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary), the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, and the officers designated to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary by section 88 of Executive Order 13286 of February 28, 2003 (“Amendment of Executive Orders, and Other Actions, in Connection With the Transfer of Certain Functions to the Secretary of Homeland Security”), have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary, the following officers of the Department of Homeland Security, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary, if they are eligible to act as Secretary under the provisions of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary:                    

Director, Region V, Federal Emergency Management Agency;

Director, Region VI, Federal Emergency Management Agency;

Director, Region VII, Federal Emergency Management Agency;

Director, Region VIII, Federal Emergency Management Agency; and

Director, Region X, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

**Sec. 2. Exceptions.**

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Secretary pursuant to this order.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-26684

Billing code 3195-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3739 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3739

  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
 terminate payments to States certified under that Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2011

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
 terminate payments to States certified under that Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF PAYMENTS TO STATES CERTIFIED UNDER SURFACE 
              MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT 0F 1977.

    (a) Termination of Payments.--Section 411(h)(2) of the Surface 
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(2)) is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Limitation.--No payment shall be made under this 
        subsection to a State or Indian tribe for which a certification 
        is made under subsection (a) in which the Secretary concurs.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such Act is further amended--
            (1) in section 402(i)(2) (30 U.S.C. 1232(i)(2)), by 
        striking ``paragraphs (1)(A) and (2)(A)'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (1)(A)''; and
            (2) by amending section 411(h)(1)(D) (30 U.S.C. 
        1240a(h)(1)(D)) to read as follows:
                    ``(D) Use of funds.--A State or Indian tribe shall 
                use any amounts provided under this paragraph for the 
                purposes described in section 403.''.
                                 <all>
```