alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5322.7003 Waivers       See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5322.70 — RESTRICTIONS ON THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL FOR WORK ON CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICE CONTRACTS IN NONCONTIGUOUS STATES
January 15, 2016 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC), I am responding to a 

request in the Joint Explanatory Statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

2016. The NRC was directed in the Joint Explanatory Statement to submit a report with a 

general description and the status of all proposed rules currently pending before the 

Commission, including the docketing date for the proposed rule. Enclosed is a report that 

responds to this request for the two proposed rules currently pending before the Commission. 

Additionally, enclosed is a listing of all planned rulemakings 

Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosures: 

1. Proposed Rules Currently Pending 

 before the Commission 

2. Listing of All Planned Rulemakings 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 
Identical letters sent to: 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Thad Cochran 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Mikulski
exv10w3



 




Exhibit
10.3



AMENDMENT TO S-76 NEW HELICOPTER SALES AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of the Acceptance Date stated below, by and between the Sikorsky
Contracting Entity (“Sikorsky”) named below and the Buyer named below, hereby amends the S-76 New
Helicopter Sales Agreement between the parties as follows:




     1. Definitions/Information for this Amendment



	 	 	 
	Buyer:

	 	Offshore Logistics, Inc.
	Sikorsky Contracting Entity:

	 	Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
	Sikorsky Contract No.:

	 	S76TD02065
	Amendment No.:

	 	2






     2. Amendment — Amend the S-76 Sales Agreements as follows:



     Revise Exhibit A. FOR THE 2003 DELIVERED AIRCRAFT ONLY, as follows:



     1. Add 6086 Collective guards.



     2. Add 8660 Rotor Pedals Lube Kit



     3. Add 9009 Vertical Pylon Access Panels, CSN-76-207



     4. Add 9011 Three (3) Corrosion Inspection Holes



     5. Add 8876 Cyclic Stick Position Guard



     6. Add 8301 Annuciator “Fuel Transfer Feed On”.



     7. Delete 9014 Meggitt Avionics CVR: SC500-120



     8. Add 9021 L3 CVR (replaces Meggitt SCR500-120)



     9. Add 9016: Life Vest Pouches (remove from fuel deck).



     10. Add 9017: Boarding Card Stowage on ERDA Seats.



     11. Add 9018: Covers and Drains on Flight Manual Holders.



     12. Add 9019: Delete Floor Cover and Add Non-Skid.



     13. Add 9020 Mobile 291 Engine Oil



     14. Add 9002 HUMS provisions (wire harness/shelving)



*




     Payment and Price changes in Items 15 and 16 above reflect a credit to Buyer in
the amount of $48,900 as a result of the specified configuration changes.




	3.	 	Reaffirmation — Except as modified above, all of the provisions of
the Agreement remain the same, and the Agreement as modified hereby,
is reaffirmed.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by each party’s authorized
representative.



	 	 	 
	Offshore Logistics, Inc.:

	 	Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation:
	By: /s/ Drury A. Milke

	 	By: /s/ Tommy H. Thomason
	Name: Drury A. Milke

	 	Name: Tommy H. Thomason
	Title: Executive Vice President

	 	Title: Vice President — Civil Programs
	Date: March 28, 2003

	 	Date: April 1, 2003
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7235

CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CAPTAIN ALLEN DAVIS; SERGEANT LOCKLEAR; MR. TUBBS; MR. LOWRY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James J. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03214

- D )

Submitted : March 30, 2023 Decided: June 29, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER , Circuit Judge , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7235 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

. See Tunstall v. Davis , No. 5:22

- ct

- 03214

- D ( E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7235 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3627]


State of Florida; Amendment <greek-i>4

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
November 17, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 
13, 2004, and continuing through November 17, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is January 3, 2005 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 16, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: November 29, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-26758 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 14608 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:15

- cv
- 01158

- WMA DIANE HILLIARD,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________ ( October 25, 2016 )
Before WILSON , WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Diane Hilliard appeals pro s e t he dismissal of her action against the Alabama Department of Transportation. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Hilliard challenges

Case: 15-14608 Date Filed: 10/25/2016 Page: 1 of 32 the order dismiss ing her c omplaint sua sponte , but we previously rul ed that her appeal of that order was untimely . Hilliard also challenges the denial of h er motion s for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and for the appointment of counsel . We affirm. The Department argues that Hilliard’s motion for an extension of time
should be treated as a motion to alter or amend the judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, but we disagree. Hilliard d id not mention the judgment of dismissal in her
motion . Hilliard requested “ the [district] court to extend the time for filing of her
Amende d C omplaint and [for her] to acquire legal counsel.”
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Hilliard’s
motion for an extension of time. A plaintiff may obtain an extension of time “ after the time has expired if [she] failed to act because of excusable neglect.” Fed. R.
Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B). H illiard filed her motion on September 16, 2015, 29 days after the district court dismissed her action against the Department

. Although Hilliard

reque st ed additional time to retain counsel to help her “perfect and pursue her . . .
claims , ” she failed to ex plain her delay in hiring counsel after being warned two
months earlier that he r complaint was fatally defective

. The district court also did not abuse its discretion by denying Hilliard’s motion for the appointment of counsel. “ Appointment of counsel in civil cases is

. . . a privilege justified only by exceptional circumstances, such as the presence of

Case: 15-14608 Date Filed: 10/25/2016 Page: 2 of 33 facts and legal issues which are so novel or complex as to require the assistance of a trained practitioner.” Kilgo v. Ricks , 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted). “The key is whether the pro se litigant needs help in presenting the essential merits of his or her position in the
court.” Id. Hilliard’s complaint of discrimination based on gender and race was not novel or complex.
W e AFFIRM the dismissal of Hilliard’s action against the Department. Case: 15-14608 Date Filed: 10/25/2016 Page: 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #P068] 

In accordance with notices received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective October 22 and November 10, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is hereby amended to include Giles and Unicoi Counties in the State of Tennessee as disaster areas due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on September 16-20, 2004. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 6, 2004.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008)

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-26759 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
3415.606 Agency procedures.

(b)

(1) The HCA or designee is the contact point to coordinate the receipt, control, and handling of

unsolicited proposals.

(2) Offerors must direct unsolicited proposals to the HCA.

Parent topic: Subpart 3415.6—Unsolicited Proposals
#### Marilyn Gallagher et al., Appellants, v. William H. Glennon, Defendant, and Malcolm McEwan, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 716.]
§ 210.3-17 Financial statements of natural persons. ( a ) In lieu of the financial statements otherwise required, a natural person may file an unaudited balance sheet as of a date within 90 days of date of filing and unaudited statements of comprehensive income for each of the three most recent fiscal years.
( b ) Financial statements conforming with the instructions as to financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated and 50 percent or less owned persons under § 210.3-09(a) shall be separately presented for: ( 1 ) Each business owned as a sole proprietor,
( 2 ) each partnership, business trust, unincorporated association, or similar business organization of which the person holds a controlling interest and
( 3 ) each corporation of which the person, directly or indirectly, owns securities representing more than 50 percent of the voting power.
( c ) Separate financial statements may be omitted, however, for each corporation, business trust, unincorporated association, or similar business organization if the person's total investment in such entity does not exceed 5 percent of his total assets *and* the person's total income from such entity does not exceed 5 percent of his gross income; *Provided,* that the person's aggregate investment in and income from all such omitted entities shall not exceed 15 percent of his total assets and gross income, respectively.
[46 FR 12491, Feb. 17, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 25215, June 18, 1985; 83 FR 50199, Oct. 4, 2018]
#### § 682.5 Effective date.

The rule in this part is effective on June 1, 2005.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 20, 2017

N o. 04

- 16

- 00541

- CR

Gerardo VENEGAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CRH

- 001475

- D3

Honorable Rebecca R amirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received and

filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the State’s brief is this

date GRANTED. Time is extended t o August 25, 2017.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

LUZ ESTRADA

CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

cc: David Reuthinger Jr.

1110 Victoria St Ste 401

Laredo, TX 78040 Stephen Foster

310 S. St. Mary's

Suite 2400

San Antonio, TX 78205
#### § 1401.4 [Reserved]
### §13812. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30802, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1858, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1996 to 2000, was omitted as obsolete.
MP5346.1 - GENERAL    **Parent topic:** MP5346 -Quality AssuranceMP5346.103 - Contracting Office Responsibilities       *Revised: June 2023*         The following mandatory procedures will be used when awarding services acquisitions unless the three conditions at DFARS PGI 201.602-2(v)(A) are met.         1. Roles and Responsibilities         a. The COCO/Chiefs of Performance Management Offices must ensure that a:         (1) Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) is appointed and properly trained to integrate the quality contract requirements into the quality assurance program, act as the liaison between the contracting and functional organizations, and provide training and record keeping in accordance with MP5301.602-2(d).         b. The CO must:         (1) Advise the acquisition team on Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan development.         (2) Designate Contracting Officer’s Representatives (COR) in accordance with MP5301.602-2(d)         c. The QAPC must:         (1) Successfully complete the QAPC course conducted by AETC prior to conducting any training.         (2) Support the acquisition team in the development of contract quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring that requirements are clearly stated and enforceable.         (3) Assist the acquisition team during market research efforts in determining commercial quality assurance practices.         (4) Assist, as required, with the evaluation of contractor Quality Control Plans.         (5) Successfully complete the Management of Subcontracting Compliance (CLC 059) course offered by the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) A new requirement for 1102’s and CORs.
510.001 Policy.

Requiring activities and contracting officers shall use the results of market research to identify if

there are existing tiered solutions (i.e., Tier 3, Tier 2, or Tier 1 solutions) that can meet the need

prior to proceeding with establishing a Tier 0 solution (see subpart 507.71).

Parent topic: Part 510 - Market Research
#### Peter Gentile, Respondent, v. S. V. R. Malcolm and Another, Composing the Copartnership, etc., Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
§ 22.7 Permitted depositories: Treatment of Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral. A Permitted Depository shall treat all funds in a Cleared Swaps Customer Account as Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral. A Permitted Depository shall not hold, dispose of, or use any such Cleared Swaps Customer Collateral as belonging to any person other than: ( a ) The Cleared Swaps Customers of the futures commission merchant maintaining such Cleared Swaps Customer Account or;
( b ) The Cleared Swaps Customers of the futures commission merchants for which the derivatives clearing organization maintains such Cleared Swaps Customer Account.
#### Henry L. Steinke, Plaintiff in Error, v. Julius Eisner, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 19,001.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Caveblt, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 25, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Henry L. Steinke against Julius Eisner to recover for money loaned and merchandise sold and delivered. Upon a trial without a jury, the testimony of plaintiff in support of his claim was contradicted categorically as to each item by the testimony of de*173fondant. To reverse a judgment entered on a finding in favor of defendant, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Trial, § *286a*
      ***
      *—necessity of argument.*It is not error for *the*court trying a case without a jury *to*render a decision without requiring argument of counsel.

2. Appeal and error, § *989*—when disallowance of motion for nonsuit not presented for review.*Refusal of court to allow a motion to be made for a nonsuit is not presented for review where it does not appear from the record any attempt to make such a motion was made.

Frank Foster, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §15951. Findings and definitions

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) it serves the national interest to increase petroleum refining capacity for gasoline, heating oil, diesel fuel, jet fuel, kerosene, and petrochemical feedstocks wherever located within the United States, to bring more supply to the markets for the use of the American people;

(2) United States demand for refined petroleum products currently exceeds the country's petroleum refining capacity to produce such products;

(3) this excess demand has been met with increased imports;

(4) due to lack of capacity, refined petroleum product imports are expected to grow from 7.9 percent to 10.7 percent of total refined product by 2025;

(5) refiners are still subject to significant environmental and other regulations and face several new requirements under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) over the next decade; and

(6) better coordination of Federal and State regulatory reviews may help facilitate siting and construction of new refineries to meet the demand in the United States for refined products.

#### (b) Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

#### (2) State

The term "State" means—

(A) a State;

(B) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and

(C) any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §391, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 748.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Clean Air Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(5), is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, which is classified generally to chapter 85 (§7401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of this title and Tables.
### §1564. Definitions

As used in subchapters II to VII of this chapter the term "Federal Works Administrator" or "Administrator", or "Federal Works Agency" shall, with respect to housing, be deemed to refer to the Housing and Home Finance Administrator or the Housing and Home Finance Agency, as the case may be. Such terms shall, with respect to public works and equipment therefor, be deemed to refer to the Federal Works Administrator or the Federal Works Agency, as the case may be.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title IV, §404, as added Apr. 10, 1942, ch. 239, §4, 56 Stat. 213; amended Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapters III and VI of this chapter, referred to in text, were comprised of sections 1531 to 1536 and 1571 to 1576, respectively, of this title and have been omitted from the Code. For further details, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Housing and Home Finance Administrator" and "Housing and Home Finance Agency" for "National Housing Administrator" and "National Housing Agency", respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Housing and Home Finance Agency transferred to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669, which is classified to section 3534(a) of this title. Section 9(c) of such act, set out as a note under section 3531 of this title, provided that references to Housing and Home Finance Agency or to any agency or officer therein are to be deemed to mean Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and that Housing and Home Finance Agency has lapsed.

Functions under sections 1531 to 1534 of this title transferred from Federal Works Administrator to Administrator of General Services by act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103(a), 63 Stat. 380, which was classified to section 753(a) of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and subsequently transferred to Housing and Home Finance Administrator by Reorg. Plan No. 17 of 1950, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3177, 64 Stat. 1269, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Works Administrator relating to defense housing consolidated with other agencies into National Housing Agency during World War II by Ex. Ord. No. 9070.