alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc., the sole Manager ofVestin Fund III, LLC, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vestin Fund III, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Vestin Fund III, LLC as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Vestin Fund III, LLC and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to Vestin Fund III LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund III, LLC’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund III, LLC’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during Vestin Fund III, LLC’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affectVestin Fund III LLC’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Vestin Fund III, LLC’sauditors and the audit committee of Vestin Fund III, LLC’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect Vestin Fund III, LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in Vestin Fund III, LLC’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 12, 2005/s/ Michael V. Shustek
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Summary of Quarterly Meetings with NEI and Industry on December 11, 2014 Regarding Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities and CER.

Accession Number: ML14351A291

Date Released: Friday, December 19, 2014

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML14351A294 - Summary of Quarterly Meetings with NEI and Industry on December 11, 2014 Regarding Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities and the Cumulative Effects of Regulation. (2 page(s), 12/18/2014)
    - ML14351A309 - Enclosure 1:  NRC Slides for Quarterly CER Meeting for Fuel Cycle Corrections. (26 page(s), 12/18/2014)
    - ML14351A314 - Enclosure 2:  Attendees Sheet for December 2014 Fuel Cycle Regulatory Activities and CER. (1 page(s), 12/18/2014)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 717.1 Clarification procedures; challenge inspection requests pursuant to Article IX of the Convention. ( a ) Article IX of the Convention sets forth procedures for clarification, between States Parties, of issues about compliance with the Convention. States Parties may attempt to resolve such issues through consultation between themselves or through the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). A State Party may also request the OPCW to conduct an on-site challenge inspection of any facility or location in the territory or in any other place under the jurisdiction or control of any other State Party. Such an on-site challenge inspection request shall be for the sole purpose of clarifying and resolving any questions concerning possible non-compliance with the Convention.
( b ) In the event that BIS receives a request for clarification, pursuant to Article IX of the Convention, concerning possible non-compliance with the CWC, any person or facility subject to the CWCR (parts 710 through 729 of this subchapter) that receives an official written request from BIS for clarification must, within five working days from receipt of such request, provide BIS with any relevant information required to respond to the OPCW or the State Party(ies) who requested clarification under Article IX. BIS will contact the person or facility subject to the Article IX clarification, as early as practicable, prior to issuing an official written request for clarification to the person or facility.
### §15522. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15522 was editorially reclassified as section 21122 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2009- 03A S 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMM'TNIZED ^ , 

D0CKET0ST-<^^ • 032^ 5 :! DATE /^M^/ y ^,( ^ 

This approval and grant of antitrust imniui,., is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action .is efTective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above |)j:qcedure, the^-^y,,pc ^ iji 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

BY: 

irector, Offfce of International Aviation 

04 December 2009 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

lATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
### §1482. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title V, §509], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1243

Section, acts July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title V, §512, 63 Stat. 438; July 14, 1952, ch. 723, §11(b), 66 Stat. 604; June 29, 1954, ch. 410, §5(b), 68 Stat. 320; Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §812(b), 68 Stat. 647; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 783, title V, §501(2), 69 Stat. 654; Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1029, title VI, §606(b), 70 Stat. 1114; June 30, 1961, Pub. L. 87–70, title VIII, §801(c), 75 Stat. 186; Sept. 4, 1964, Pub. L. 88–560, title V, §501(b), 78 Stat. 796; Aug. 10, 1965, Pub. L. 89–117, title X, §1005(a), 79 Stat. 501, related to authorization to make commitments for contributions aggregating not to exceed $10,000,000 during period beginning July 1, 1956, and ending Oct. 1, 1969, in connection with loans made pursuant to section 1473 of this title.
### §1383d. Outreach program for children

#### (a) Establishment

The Commissioner of Social Security shall establish and conduct an ongoing program of outreach to children who are potentially eligible for benefits under this subchapter by reason of disability or blindness.

#### (b) Requirements

Under this program, the Commissioner of Social Security shall—

(1) aim outreach efforts at populations for whom such efforts would be most effective; and

(2) work in cooperation with other Federal, State, and private agencies, and nonprofit organizations, which serve blind or disabled individuals and have knowledge of potential recipients of supplemental security income benefits, and with agencies and organizations (including school systems and public and private social service agencies) which focus on the needs of children.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XVI, §1635, as added Pub. L. 101–239, title VIII, §8008(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2463; amended Pub. L. 103–296, title I, §107(a)(4), Aug. 15, 1994, 108 Stat. 1478.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 103–296 substituted "Commissioner of Social Security" for "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–296 effective Mar. 31, 1995, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 103–296, set out as a note under section 401 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 101–239, title VIII, §8008(b), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2463, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] shall take effect 3 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 19, 1989]."

#### Application to Northern Mariana Islands

For applicability of this section to the Northern Mariana Islands, see section 502(a)(1) of the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America and Proc. No. 4534, Oct. 24, 1977, 42 F.R. 6593, set out as notes under section 1801 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.00.005.522 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2011 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 01/04/13 Time: 9:30 am

pm

Company Name: Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

(MO DNR)

ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Bartell

Contact Name: Travis Abernathy Contact Phone Number: (573) 840-9787

General Subject: 2011 DMR Concentration Values and Units

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Missouri DNR – 573-751-0763 

Water Pollution Control Branch – 573 – 751 – 1300

On January 4th, 2013 at 9:30am I called the Water Pollution Control Branch of the Missouri DNR (573-751-

1300). I was told to contact the county offices for DMR information.

St. Louis office – 314-416-2960

SE Region (for facilities in Bunker, MO) – 573-840-9750

I called the St. Louis office and was transferred to Mary Alice Hukill (314-416-2960) and left a message for 

her. She returned my call and stated that she believed the iron and total residual chlorine concentrations should 

be in micrograms per liter not milligrams per liter for the St. Louis Co. Water facility (NPDES: MO0003727). 

She said she would pull a DMR for the facility and double check and get back to me. At 4:30pm Ms. Hukill 

returned my call and confirmed that the concentrations for iron and total residual chlorine should be in 

micrograms per liter not milligrams per liter.

I called the SE Regional office and was transferred to Travis Abernathy (573-840-9787). I gave him the names 

and NPDES ID’s for the three facilities in question: Fletcher Mine, Brushy Creek Mine, & Doe Run Co. West 

Fork Facility. He stated that all concentrations should be in micrograms per liter not milligrams per liter. He 

also stated that I could Google the NPDES IDs and the facility permits should show up. 

Fletcher Mine (MO0001856): Lead concentrations should be ug/L not mg/L

Brushy Creek Mine (MO0001848): Copper, Lead, Cadmium, Zinc concentrations should be ug/L not mg/L

Doe Run Co. West Fork Facility (MO0100218): Lead, Cadmium, Zinc, Copper should be ug/L not mg/L
### §10202. Research on alternatives for permanent disposal of high-level radioactive waste

The Secretary shall continue and accelerate a program of research, development, and investigation of alternative means and technologies for the permanent disposal of high-level radioactive waste from civilian nuclear activities and Federal research and development activities except that funding shall be made from amounts appropriated to the Secretary for purposes of carrying out this section. Such program shall include examination of various waste disposal options.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title II, §222, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2254.)
### §15305. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15305 was editorially reclassified as section 20905 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
|  |  | Standards Publications- Fact Sheet on Standards of the Federal Geographic Data Committe  FGDC Endorsed Standards |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1.15 Amendment or repeal of a rule. ( a ) *Substantive amendment or repeal of a rule.* The procedures for substantive amendment to or repeal of a rule are the same as for the issuance thereof.
( b ) *Nonsubstantive amendment of a rule.* The Commission may make a nonsubstantive amendment to a rule by announcing the amendment in the Federal Register.
[46 FR 26289, May 12, 1981]
Exhibit 12
 Statements re: computation of ratios
 For the ninemonths endedSeptember 30,
    
    
    For the year ended
    
    
    For the year ended
    
    
    For the year ended
    
    
    For the year ended
    
    
    For the year ended2010
    
    
    December 31, 2009
    
    
    December 31, 2008
    
    
    December 31, 2007
    
    
    December 31, 2006
    
    
    December 31, 2005Net income from continuing operations
    
    $
    4,121,038
    
    
    $
    4,399,948
    
    
    $
    4,873,021
    
    
    $
    5,958,214
    
    
    $
    3,284,957
    
    
    $
    3,436,149Add: fixed charges
    
    
    16,113,753
    
    
    
    22,000,728
    
    
    
    20,963,484
    
    
    
    15,670,067
    
    
    
    11,490,476
    
    
    
    2,494,245Less: preferred and senior common distributions
    
    
    (3,074,970
    )
    
    
    (4,093,750
    )
    
    
    (4,093,750
    )
    
    
    (4,093,750
    )
    
    
    (2,186,890
    )
    
    
    Earnings
    
    $
    17,159,821
    
    
    $
    22,306,926
    
    
    $
    21,742,755
    
    
    $
    17,534,531
    
    
    $
    12,588,543
    
    
    $
    5,930,394Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    12,190,988
    
    
    
    16,398,938
    
    
    
    15,574,735
    
    
    
    10,847,346
    
    
    
    8,041,412
    
    
    
    2,187,586Amortization of deferred financing fees
    
    
    836,884
    
    
    
    1,495,598
    
    
    
    1,283,952
    
    
    
    717,195
    
    
    
    1,207,198
    
    
    
    260,098Estimated interest component of rent
    
    
    10,911
    
    
    
    12,442
    
    
    
    11,047
    
    
    
    11,776
    
    
    
    54,976
    
    
    
    46,561Preferred and senior common distributions
    
    
    3,074,970
    
    
    
    4,093,750
    
    
    
    4,093,750
    
    
    
    4,093,750
    
    
    
    2,186,890
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges and preferred distributions
    
    
    16,113,753
    
    
    
    22,000,728
    
    
    
    20,963,484
    
    
    
    15,670,067
    
    
    
    11,490,476
    
    
    
    2,494,245Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred distributions
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    2.4
 45
#### In the Matter of the Application of Margaret Brennan and Another, Appellants, for the Appointment of a Co-trustee of the Estate of William Brennan, Deceased. William F. Clare, as Trustee, etc., Respondent.

—Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
§ 162.6 Reasonable opportunity to opt out. ( a ) *In general.* A covered affiliate must not use eligibility information about a consumer that the covered affiliate receives from an affiliate to make a solicitation to such consumer about the covered affiliate's financial products or services, unless the consumer is provided a reasonable opportunity to opt out, as required by this subpart.
( b ) *Examples.* A reasonable opportunity to opt out under this subpart is: ( 1 ) If the opt-out notice is mailed to the consumer, the consumer has 30 days from the date the notice is mailed to opt out.
( 2 ) If the opt-out notice is sent *via* electronic means to the consumer, the consumer has 30 days from the date the consumer acknowledges receipt to elect to opt out by any reasonable method.
( 3 ) If the opt-out notice is sent *via* e-mail (where the consumer has agreed to receive disclosures by e-mail), the consumer is given 30 days after the e-mail is sent to elect to opt out by any reasonable method.
( 4 ) If the opt-out notice provided to the consumer at the time of an electronic transaction, the consumer is required to decide, as a necessary part of proceeding with the transaction, whether to opt out before completing the transaction.
( 5 ) If the opt-out notice is provided during an in-person transaction, the consumer is required to decide, as a necessary part of completing the transaction, whether to opt out through a simple process.
( 6 ) If the opt-out notice is provided in conjunction with other privacy notices required by law, the consumer is allowed to exercise the opt-out election within a reasonable period of time and in the same manner as the opt out under that privacy notice.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brillian Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 16, 2005
19
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3670 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with the 

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. WALZ of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

comply with the Uniformed Services Employment and 

Reemployment Rights Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3670 IH

1 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES 

2 EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS 

3 ACT TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY AD4 MINISTRATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(d) of the Aviation 

6 and Transportation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; 

7 Public Law 107–71) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and insert9 ing the following: 

10 ‘‘(1) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Except as pro11 vided in paragraph (2), and notwithstanding’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND

14 REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT.—In carrying out the 

15 functions authorized under paragraph (1), the 

16 Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions 

17 set forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States 

18 Code.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 270 

21 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Searched for **https://inspire2serve.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://inspire2serve.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Jim RODGERS, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 14, 1950.

Moore *&*Pittman for movant.

A. B. Punk, Attorney General, and Wm. F. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for appeal from a judgment of conviction for violation of local option law, imposing a fine of $60 and 60 days in jail. The motion is denied. Judgment affirmed.