alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles Sander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Sander                               
|                         |  |  |  | Charles Sander                                   
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of Catcher Holdings, Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Catcher Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Catcher
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 144.1 Service upon the Commission. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the Secretary of the Commission is the only person authorized to accept service of a demand directed to the Commission or to an employee of the Commission for documentary information contained in or relating to information contained in the files of the Commission.
( b ) Any such demand must be addressed to the Secretary of the Commission, at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters.
( c ) In the event that any such demand is attempted to be served upon an employee of the Commission other than the Secretary of the Commission, unless otherwise directed by the Commission's General Counsel, that employee shall respectfully decline to accept service on the ground that the employee is without authority to do so.
( d ) The Secretary shall promptly advise the General Counsel of any service of any demand, and the General Counsel shall thereafter advise the Commission regarding the matter.
( e ) A demand for information contained in the Commission's files concerning the registration of persons or entities for which authority has been delegated to the National Futures Association must be served upon the National Futures Association, 300 S Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL 60606, to the attention of the General Counsel.
[50 FR 11149, Mar. 20, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 49335, Sept. 25, 1995; 89 FR 71816, Sept. 4, 2024]
#### Myron Young, Appellant, v. Mary Fanning, Respondent.

Motion granted and appeal'’áismíss’éd, with $10 costs of this motion.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PROGRAM FOR RUNAWAY AND HOMELESS YOUTH
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Howard Forrest Risher v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00625

- CR

Trial court case number: 1513823

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s a ppointed counsel has moved to withdraw from th is appeal and filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)

. Under

Anders , if appointed counsel concludes after reviewing the rec ord and applicable law that the appeal is without merit, counsel must advise the court, file a motion to withdraw, and file a brief discussing any issue that might arguably support the appeal. See id. at 744; Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 318 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The appellate court must then perform an independent

examination of the record and the law to determine whether the appeal is frivolous. See Anders

, 386 U.S. at 744. The question before us is not who will ulti mately prevail but instead whether any

non

- frivolous issue exists. If the court determines that there are arguable issues, it must abate the appeal and remand with orders for the trial court to appoint new counsel. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 51 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Based on our independent review of the record and applicable law , we conclude that a nonfrivolous issue may exist. Accordingly, we strike counsel’s Anders brief and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We abate this appeal and rema nd the cause for the trial court to appoint new appellate counsel. The trial court is ordered to inform this Court in writing of the identity of new counsel and the date of appointment within 20 days of the date of this order

. Appellant’s brief

will be du e 30 days after the trial court appoints new counsel. This appeal will be reinstated after the notice of appointment is received by this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Gordon Goo dman

__________

Acting individually

Date: __ May 14, 2019

___
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Katherine 

Lee Martin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steve Dias appeals the district court’s order denying his 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Diaz, No. 3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. 

Nov. 18, 2015); see United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 

(4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion 

for abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Company Plant Source Source ID

FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Middle Melter Middle Melter

FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Electric steel shell West Melter

FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Forming, Oven, 

Cooling

Batt Line (BL)

FiberTEK Lakeland, FL Forming Unbonded Line (UL)

FiberTEK Nephi, UT Electric steel shell Middle Melter

FiberTEK Nephi, UT Electric steel shell West Melter

FiberTEK Nephi, UT Forming, curing, 

cooling

BL

FiberTEK Nephi, UT Forming UL
Control method Stack ID Stack Height (ft) Stack Diameter (ft)

Baghouse Middle Melter 

Baghouse

25 1.5

Baghouse West Melter 

Baghouse

25 1.5

Scrubber 1, 2, and 4 Main Stack 140 9

Scrubber 3 Main Stack 140 9

Baghouse Middle Melter 

Baghouse

Baghouse West Melter 

Baghouse

Scrubber 1, 2, & 4 Main Stack

Scrubber 3 Main Stack
Notes/ Questions

Common stack for bonded and non-bonded 

product? Do each of these sources have their 

own stack? 

Fibertek Lakeland, FL and Nephi, UT have 

common stacks for bonded and unbonded lines, 

including forming for both unbonded (1 

scrubber) and bonded lines(2 scrubbers), Oven 

and Cooling(1 scrubber) on bonded line. Each 

Melter Baghouse has its own stack. 
Main Stack

West Melter 

Baghouse

Main Stack

Middle Melter 

Baghouse
No: 16-020 April 28, 2016

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC To Issue Southern N.J. Early Site Permit,

Following Conclusion of Mandatory Hearing

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has cleared the way 

for the agency’s Office of New Reactors to issue an Early Site Permit for a site adjacent to the Salem 

and Hope Creek nuclear power plants in Salem County, N.J. The board’s mandatory hearing, on the 

application from PSEG Power LLC and PSEG Nuclear LLC, found the staff’s review adequate to make 

the necessary regulatory safety and environmental findings.

The NRC staff will work to issue the ESP promptly, and the permit will be valid for up to 20 

years from the issuance date. The permit resolves a number of site-related issues, including many 

environmental impacts, but does not authorize any NRC-regulated construction activities. PSEG would 

have to apply separately for an NRC license to build and operate a specific reactor design at the site.

The NRC staff’s technical review of the PSEG ESP application covered issues such as how the 

site’s characteristics could affect plant safety, environmental protection, and plans for coping with 

emergencies. The staff published a final environmental impact statement for the permits in November 

2015, and a final safety evaluation in September 2015. More information on the PSEG ESP review is 

available on the NRC website.
#### § 1241.1 Scope.

This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for crib mattresses. The scope of this standard for crib mattresses includes all crib mattresses within the scope of ASTM F2933, *Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Crib Mattresses,* including: Full-size crib mattresses, non-full-size crib mattresses, and after-market mattresses for play yards and non-full-size cribs.
§ 205.7 No private right of action. ( a ) Nothing in this part is intended to, or does, create a private right of action against any attorney, law firm, or issuer based upon compliance or noncompliance with its provisions.
( b ) Authority to enforce compliance with this part is vested exclusively in the Commission.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **7 6**  **80**

BARRY JOHNSON ,
P laintiff

– Appell ant ,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Joshua Royster, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCC Butner, Mid

- Atlantic Region , Defen d a nt

– Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , Chief District Judge. ( 5 : 1 0

- c t

- 0 30 0 2

- FL )

Submitted : February 24, 2011 Decided: March 3, 2011

Before GREGO RY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Barry Johnson , Appellant Pro Se

. Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , R aleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Barry Johnson appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his action for damages pursuant to the Federal Torts
Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (2006) . We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. United States Dep’t of Justice , No. 5:10

- ct

- 03002

- FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5,
2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presente d in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
### §16196. Energy Efficiency Science Initiative

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish an Energy Efficiency Science Initiative to be managed by the Assistant Secretary in the Department with responsibility for energy conservation under section 7133(a)(9) of this title, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science, for grants to be competitively awarded and subject to peer review for research relating to energy efficiency.

#### (b) Report

The Secretary shall submit to Congress, along with the annual budget request of the President submitted to Congress, a report on the activities of the Energy Efficiency Science Initiative, including a description of the process used to award the funds and an explanation of how the research relates to energy efficiency.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §916, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 862.)
5306.502 Duties and Responsibilities       See MP5306.502, *Air Force Competition and Commercial Advocacy Program*.     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5306.5 - COMPETITION ADVOCATES
§ 2016.2 Timetable for reviews. Beginning in calendar year 2003, reviews of pending petitions shall be conducted at least once each year, according to the following schedule, unless otherwise specified by Federal Register notice: ( a ) September 15: Deadline for submission of petitions for review;
( b ) On or about December 1: Announcement published in the Federal Register of the results of preliminary review;
( c ) Decemeber/January: Written comments submitted and a public hearing held on any proposed actions;
( d ) February/March: Preparation of recommendations to the President, Presidential decision, and implementation of Presidential decision.
#### § 160.16 Protection of Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to modify, limit or supersede the operation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.,* and no inference shall be drawn on the basis of the provisions of this part regarding whether information is transaction or experience information under section 603 of that Act.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1549-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

November 8, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Anthony A. Russell, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. 

This action terminates my appointment of Michael J. Hall as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-26706 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly  Report of CepTor  Corporation,  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William H.  Pursley,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 12, 2005

                               /s/ William H. Pursley
                               --------------------------------
                               William H. Pursley
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial         condition and results of operationsof the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

DavidJ. VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

May 12, 2006

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004     /s/ Wayne A. Pratt   Wayne A. Pratt Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer
§ 171.10 Motions. ( a ) *In general.* An application for a form of relief not otherwise specifically provided for in this part shall be made by a written motion, filed with the Proceedings Clerk. The motion shall state the relief sought, basis for the relief and the authority relied upon.
( b ) *Answers to motions.* Unless otherwise provided, a party may file a written response to a motion within five days after service of the motion.
( c ) *Motions for procedural orders.* Motions for procedural orders, including motions for extensions of time, may be acted on at any time, without awaiting a response thereto. Any party adversely affected by such action may request reconsideration, vacation or modification of the action.
( d ) *Dilatory motions.* Frivolous or repetitive motions dealing with the same subject matter shall not be permitted.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Exploring Careers

              																								United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.						"Exploring Careers: Sales Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2001-6" in *Exploring Careers*			(1979).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4731/item/499429, accessed on September 26, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER