alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-16-035 October 6, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Preparing for Hurricane Matthew

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched additional inspectors to three nuclear 

plants and will activate its regional incident response center in Atlanta later today as the agency 

prepares for the effects of Hurricane Matthew on NRC-licensed facilities near the expected path of the 

storm.

Current projections indicate Florida Power & Light Company’s St. Lucie plant on the east coast 

of Florida is likely to receive hurricane-force winds and heavy rain beginning early Friday.

Late Tuesday evening, the staff at the St. Lucie nuclear plant declared an unusual event, lowest 

of the NRC emergency classifications, based on the hurricane warning issued for the area. The plant 

staff is also working through severe weather procedures, including ensuring that all loose debris and 

equipment has been removed or secured and conducting walkdowns of important systems and 

equipment.

The staff at FPL’s Turkey Point plant south of Miami and the NRC inspectors there are also 

preparing for wind, rain and storm surge with similar activities as are the staff and NRC inspectors at 

Duke Energy’s Brunswick nuclear plant near Southport, N.C.

The Global Nuclear Fuel – Americas plant near Wilmington, N.C., is also following the storm 

preparation procedures for nuclear fuel facilities.

NRC resident inspectors at the Turkey Point, St. Lucie, and Brunswick plants have verified that 

all the preparations have been completed, and the plants emergency diesel generators are available to be 

used if the storm affects off-site power supplies. 

The NRC regional office in Atlanta has dispatched region-based inspectors or inspectors from 

other unaffected plants to ensure a 24-hour NRC presence at the three plants closest to the storm’s path.

From the NRC Region II incident response center in Atlanta, NRC staff members will monitor 

the path and strength of Hurricane Matthew while remaining in contact with plant operators, NRC onsite inspectors, the NRC’s headquarters operations center and state emergency officials in Florida and 

North Carolina. 

The NRC inspectors will remain at the nuclear plant sites and the incident response center will 

remain staffed until the agency is assured that the storm no longer poses a risk to those facilities.
### §14136f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14136f was editorially reclassified as section 40728 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 148.24 Comments by other parties.

Any party to an adjudicatory proceeding other than the applicant and counsel for the Commission or for another relevant agency may file comments on an application within 30 days after it is served or on an answer within 15 days after it is served. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the Presiding Officer determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.
§ 1027.7 Coordinating offset with another Federal agency. ( a ) *The CPSC as the creditor agency.* ( 1 ) When the Executive Director determines that an employee of another agency (i.e., the paying agency) owes a debt to the CPSC, the Executive Director shall, as appropriate: ( i ) Certify in writing to the paying agency that the employee owes the debt, the amount and basis of the debt, the date on which payment was due, and the date the Government's right to collect the debt accrued, and that this part 1027 has been approved by the Office of Personnel Management.
( ii ) Unless the employee has consented to salary offset in writing or signed a statement acknowledging receipt of the required procedures, and the written consent is sent to the paying agency, the Executive Director must advise the paying agency of the action(s) taken under this part 1027, and the date(s) they were taken.
( iii ) Request the paying agency to collect the debt by salary offset. If deductions must be made in installments, the Executive Director may recommend to the paying agency the amount or percentage of disposable pay to be collected in each installment;
( iv ) Arrange for a hearing upon the proper petitioning by the employee;
( v ) If the employee is in the process of separating from the Federal service, the CPSC must submit its debt claim to the paying agency as provided in this part. The paying agency must certify the total amount collected, give a copy of the certification to the employee, and send a copy of the certification and notice of the employee's separation to the CPSC. If the paying agency is aware that the employee is entitled to Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund or other similar payments, it must certify to the agency responsible for making such payments that the debtor owes a debt, including the amount of the debt, and that the provisions of 5 CFR 550.1108 have been followed; and
( vi ) If the employee has already separated from federal service and all payments due from the paying agency have been paid, the Executive Director may request, unless otherwise prohibited, that money payable to the employee from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund or other similar funds be collected by administrative offset.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *The CPSC as the paying agency.* ( 1 ) Upon receipt of a properly certified debt claim from another agency, deductions will be scheduled to begin at the next established pay interval. The employee must receive written notice that CPSC has received a certified debt claim from the creditor agency, the amount of the debt, the date salary offset will begin, and the amount of the deduction(s). CPSC shall not review the merits of the creditor agency's determination of the validity or the amount of the certified claim.
( 2 ) If the employee transfers to another agency after the creditor agency has submitted its debt claim to CPSC and before the debt is collected completely, CPSC must certify the amount collected. One copy of the certification must be furnished to the employee. A copy must be furnished to the creditor agency with notice of the employee's transfer.
### §§1467 to 1468a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted pursuant to section 5316 of this title which terminated authority to make grants or loans under this subchapter after Jan. 1, 1975.

Section 1467, act July 15, 1949, ch. 388, title I, §116, as added Aug. 10, 1965, Pub. L. 89–117, title III, §311(a), 79 Stat. 477; amended May 25, 1967, Pub. L. 90–19, §6(b), 81 Stat. 21; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title V, §510, 82 Stat. 524; Dec. 24, 1969, Pub. L. 91–152, title II, §202(b), 83 Stat. 386, related to grants to cities, other municipalities, counties, and Indian tribes, etc., for demolition of unsafe structures.

Section 1468, act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title I, §117, as added Aug. 10, 1965, Pub. L. 89–117, title III, §311(a), 79 Stat. 478; amended May 25, 1967, Pub. L. 90–19, §6(b), 81 Stat. 21; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title V, §515, 82 Stat. 525; Dec. 24, 1969, Pub. L. 91–152, title II, §202(c), 83 Stat. 386, related to grants to cities, other municipalities, counties, and Indian tribes, etc., for code enforcement.

Section 1468a, act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title I, §118, as added Aug. 1, 1968, Pub. L. 90–448, title V, §514, 82 Stat. 525; amended Dec. 24, 1969, Pub. L. 91–152, title II, §202(d), 83 Stat. 386, related to interim assistance for blighted areas, grants to cities, other municipalities, counties, and Indian tribes, etc., and encouragement of employment of unemployed and underemployed residents.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                      18 U.S.C.ss.1350,

                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Centennial   Specialty  Foods
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas L. Evans, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ DOUGLAS L. EVANS
                                    --------------------
                                    Douglas L. Evans
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Dated: May 17, 2004
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Smart Active Label Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Smart Active Label 
Consortium, Inc., (``SAL'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Smart Active 
Label Consortium, Inc., Wakefield, MA. The nature and scope of SAL's 
standards development activities are: (a) To bring smart active label 
technology into use in a wide range of industries; and (b) to bring 
together a critical mass of technology suppliers, manufacturers, 
solutions providers, end-users, standards organizations, governmental 
bodies, and academic institutions.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-26203 Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §12702. Objective of national housing policy

The objective of national housing policy shall be to reaffirm the long-established national commitment to decent, safe, and sanitary housing for every American by strengthening a nationwide partnership of public and private institutions able—

(1) to ensure that every resident of the United States has access to decent shelter or assistance in avoiding homelessness;

(2) to increase the Nation's supply of decent housing that is affordable to low-income and moderate-income families and accessible to job opportunities;

(3) to improve housing opportunities for all residents of the United States, particularly members of disadvantaged minorities, on a nondiscriminatory basis;

(4) to help make neighborhoods safe and livable;

(5) to expand opportunities for homeownership;

(6) to provide every American community with a reliable, readily available supply of mortgage finance at the lowest possible interest rates; and

(7) to encourage tenant empowerment and reduce generational poverty in federally assisted and public housing by improving the means by which self-sufficiency may be achieved.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title I, §102, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4085.)
### subpart 14—national institute on alcohol abuse and alcoholism
#### In the Matter of the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Law of the Estate of Edwin Norton, Deceased. Lucy E. Norton, as Executrix, etc., Appellant; The Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1549-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATES: November 8, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Anthony A. 
Russell, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this declared disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Michael J. Hall as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-26706 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frederick Underwood, Respondent, against John H. Whitney et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The principal question raised is the question of causal connection between the injury and subsequent continuing disability. The claimant was injured on July 10, 1946, when he fell from the second story of his employer’s residence while he was engaged in window washing. He sustained a comminuted fracture of the inferior ramus of the right pubic bone. After the fracture healed and the claimant returned to work, he complained of stomach disorders which caused physical pain interfering with his ability to continue at work. There was medical testimony to the effect that the claimant’s symptoms were psychiatric in nature and were the result of the accident. The board made an award for compensation for reduced earnings. The appellants complain that the referee took into account the report of a psychiatrist who declined to appear for cross-examination because of ill health, but his report was approved and supported by another psychiatrist who was available for cross-examination but whom the appellants did not request to appear. There was also other medical proof to support the finding of causal relationship between the accident and the claimant’s condition. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergen, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.67 Notification of final disciplinary action involving financial harm to a customer. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: *Final disciplinary action* means any decision by or settlement with a contract market or swap execution facility in a disciplinary matter which cannot be further appealed at the contract market or swap execution facility, is not subject to the stay of the Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction, and has not been reversed by the Commission or any court of competent jurisdiction.
( b ) Upon any final disciplinary action in which a contract market or swap execution facility finds that a member has committed a rule violation that involved a transaction for a customer, whether executed or not, and that resulted in financial harm to the customer: ( 1 ) ( i ) The contract market or swap execution facility shall promptly provide written notice of the disciplinary action to the futures commission merchant or other registrant; and
( ii ) A futures commission merchant or other registrant that receives a notice, under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section shall promptly provide written notice of the disciplinary action to the customer as disclosed on its books and records. If the customer is another futures commission merchant or other registrant, such futures commission merchant or other registrant shall promptly provide notice to the customer.
( 2 ) A written notice required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section must include the principal facts of the disciplinary action and a statement that the contract market or swap execution facility has found that the member has committed a rule violation that involved a transaction for the customer, whether executed or not, and that resulted in financial harm to the customer. For the purposes of this paragraph, a notice which includes the information listed in § 9.11(b) of this chapter shall be deemed to include the principal facts of the disciplinary action thereof.
[77 FR 66331, Nov. 2, 2012]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTAS:  A Transonic Aircraft/Store flow field prediction codeA numerical procedure has been developed that has the capability to predict the transonic flow field around an aircraft with an arbitrarily located, separated store. The TAS code, the product of a joint General Dynamics/NASA ARC/AFWAL research and development program, will serve as the basis for a comprehensive predictive method for aircraft with arbitrary store loadings. This report described the numerical procedures employed to simulate the flow field around a configuration of this type. The validity of TAS code predictions is established by comparison with existing experimental data. In addition, future areas of development of the code are outlined. A brief description of code utilization is also given in the Appendix. The aircraft/store configuration is simulated using a mesh embedding approach. The computational domain is discretized by three meshes: (1) a planform-oriented wing/body fine mesh, (2) a cylindrical store mesh, and (3) a global Cartesian crude mesh. This embedded mesh scheme enables simulation of stores with fins of arbitrary angular orientation.Document ID19840007046Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsThompson, D. S.*(General Dynamics Corp. Fort Worth, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1983Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-3721NAS 1.26:3721Accession Number84N15114Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-11277PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840007046.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### §§ 149.152-149.159 [Reserved]
5310.002 Procedures       See the tailorable templates for documenting market research conducted.   **Parent topic:** Part 5310 - Market Research
### §15252. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15252 was editorially reclassified as section 50322 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 166.2 Authorization to trade. No futures commission merchant, retail foreign exchange dealer, introducing broker or any of their associated persons may directly or indirectly effect a transaction in a commodity interest for the account of any customer unless before the transaction the customer, or person designated by the customer to control the account: ( a ) With respect to a commodity interest as defined in any paragraph of the commodity interest definition in § 1.3 of this chapter, specifically authorized the futures commission merchant, retail foreign exchange dealer, introducing broker or any of their associated persons to effect the transaction (a transaction is “specifically authorized” if the customer or person designated by the customer to control the account specifies— ( 1 ) The precise commodity interest to be purchased or sold; and
( 2 ) The exact amount of the commodity interest to be purchased or sold); or
( b ) With respect to a commodity interest as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of the commodity interest definition in § 1.3 of this chapter, authorized in writing the futures commission merchant, introducing broker or any of their associated persons to effect transactions in commodity interests for the account without the customer's specific authorization; *Provided, however,* That if any such futures commission merchant, introducing broker or any of their associated persons is also authorized to effect transactions in foreign futures or foreign options without the customer's specific authorization, such authorization must be expressly documented.
[75 FR 55451, Sept. 10, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 66349, Nov. 2, 2012; 83 FR 7997, Feb. 23, 2018]
#### Max Wechsler, as Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Wechsler, Deceased, Respondent, v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. The date for the examinations to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.