alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12584. Ineligible service categories

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), an application submitted to the Corporation under section 12582 of this title shall include an assurance by the applicant that any national service program carried out using assistance provided under section 12571 of this title and any approved national service position provided to an applicant will not be used to perform service that provides a direct benefit to any—

(1) business organized for profit;

(2) labor union;

(3) partisan political organization;

(4) organization engaged in religious activities, unless such service does not involve the use of assistance provided under section 12571 of this title or participants—

(A) to give religious instruction;

(B) to conduct worship services;

(C) to provide instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious education or worship;

(D) to construct or operate facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship or to maintain facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship; or

(E) to engage in any form of proselytization; or

(5) nonprofit organization that fails to comply with the restrictions contained in section 501(c) of title 26, except that nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent participants from engaging in advocacy activities undertaken at their own initiative.

#### (b) Regional Corporation

The requirement of subsection (a) relating to an assurance regarding direct benefits to businesses organized for profit shall not apply with respect to a Regional Corporation, as defined in section 3(g) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602(g)), that is established in accordance with such Act [43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] as a for-profit corporation but that is engaging in nonprofit activities.

(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, §132, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §101(b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 805.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 92–203, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 688, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1601 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 43 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 132 of Pub. L. 101–610 was renumbered section 199L and classified to section 12655k of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–82, §101(e)(8)(A).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 1701 of Title 16, Conservation.
# JEA?BTORNEYGECNERAL OFTEXAS Ausn-IN. T-s 78711

July 24. 1973 Honorable Farris V. Rose County Attorney, Culberson County P. 0. Box 518 Van Horn, Texas 79855 Dear Mr. Rose: Opinion No. H- 67 Re: Constitutionality of

H. B. 1683, 63rd Leg.

You have submitted to us House Bill 1683 adopted by the recent legislature with a request that we determine its constitutionality under Article 3, §56 ofthe Constitution ofthe State of Texas. House Bill 1683 is entitled: “AN ACT related to abolishing and an election to abolish the office of county auditor of Culberson County. . . .” Itprovides in 51: “The office of county auditor of Culberson County is abolished.” Section 2calls for an annual audit ofthe books ofthe Commissioners Court of Culberson County by a certified public accounting firm. Section 3provides that the act **takes** effect only if and when an election is called and held by the Commissioners **Court** for or against abolishing the office of county auditor. Section 56 ofArticle 3ofthe Constitution of Texas provides in part:

“The Legislature shallnot, except as otherwise provided inthis Constitution, pass any local or special law, authorizing:
. . ... “Regulating the affairs of counties, cities, town’s, wards or school districts
. . . .” It cannot be doubted that House Bill 1683 is a local or special law. Itapplied to only one county and no pretense was made that it applied to any more. City ofFort Worth v. Bobbitt, 36S.W. 2d 470 (Tex. 1931);

p. 291Honorable Farris V. Rose, page 2 (H-67)

Fritter v. West, 65 S.W. 2d 414 (Tex. Civ. App., San Antonio, 1933, err. ref’d. ); Attorney General Opinions H-8 (1973) and H-52 (1973). Itis established by prior opinions ofthis office that acts affecting the office of County Auditor are acts regulating the affairs of counties and thus subject to the prohibitions of §56 ofArticle 3. Attorney General Opinions O-1748 (1939); O-1986 (1940); and see Attorney General Opinion V-893 (1949). Itis, therefore, our opinion that House Bill 1683 is unconstitutional as a special or local law attempting to achieve what must be achieved by general legislation. Your second question has to dowith the election called for by $3ofthe Bill. However, since it is our opinion that the Bill is unconstitutional, there should be no occasion for an election andwe find itunnecessary to answer that question. SUMMARY A Bill designed to abolish the office of county auditor in aparticular county is a special bill or law prohibited by Article 3, $56 ofthe Constitution ofTexas. Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas APPROVED: L-7

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee
p. 292
#### Pic Kwik Photo Service, Inc., for Itself and for the Benefit of All Other Parties Engaged in the Business of Photograph Finishing in the Counties of Nassau, Kings, Queens and Suffolk, Appellant, v. United Photographic Employees Union, C. I. O., Local 415, et al., Respondents.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 595.]
### §12371. Findings

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) children and youth are inherently our most valuable resource and their welfare, protection, healthy development, and positive role in society are essential to the Nation;

(2) children and youth deserve love, respect, and guidance, as well as good health, shelter, food, education, productive work, and preparation for responsible participation in community life;

(3) an increasing opportunity for children and youth to participate in the decisions that affect their lives is essential;

(4) the family is the primary caregiver and the source of social learning which must be supported and strengthened, but when families are unable to ensure the satisfaction of the needs of children and youth, it is society's responsibility to assist them;

(5) at a minimum, all children and youth need and deserve access to—

(A) the best possible physical and mental health;

(B) adequate and safe physical shelter;

(C) the highest quality of educational opportunity;

(D) effective training, apprenticeships, opportunities for community service, and productive employment;

(E) the widest range of civic, cultural, and recreational activities which recognize young Americans as resources and promote self-esteem and a stake in their communities;

(F) comprehensive community services which are efficient, coordinated, and readily available; and

(G) genuine participation in decisions concerning the planning and managing of their lives; and

(6) there is a great need for a comprehensive national policy with respect to young individuals, designed to engage Federal, State, and local government agencies, youth organizations, and other voluntary organizations.

#### (b) Statement of policy

It is the policy of the Congress that the Federal Government should work jointly with the States and their citizens to develop recommendations and plans for action to meet the challenge and needs of young individuals.

(Pub. L. 101–501, title IX, §982, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1280.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 8621 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin D. McClain, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[821 NYS2d 729]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered May 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, those parts of the motion seeking to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant’s vehicle, showup identifications and statements made by defendant to the police are granted and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]). In appeal No. 2, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of seven counts of robbery in the second degree *(id.)*and two counts of attempted robbery in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [b]). We agree with defendant with respect to both appeals that County Court erred in denying those parts of his motion seeking to suppress evidence obtained as a result of his arrest without probable cause, i.e., the gun that was seized from defendant’s vehicle, showup identifications and defendant’s *1262statements to the police. Contrary to the People’s contention and the conclusion of the court, the actions of the police officers in drawing their guns, handcuffing and frisking defendant, and transporting defendant, while handcuffed, to the scene of the robbery amounted to an arrest of defendant *(see People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366, 372 [1980]; *see also People v Battaglia,*56 NY2d 558, [1982], *revg*82 AD2d 389 [1981] *on dissenting op of Hancock, Jr., J.).*The People make no claim that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant at the time of those police actions. Therefore, in each appeal, we reverse the judgment, vacate defendant’s guilty plea, grant those parts of the motion of defendant seeking to suppress the physical evidence seized from defendant’s vehicle, showup identifications and statements made by defendant to the police and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

All concur, Hayes, J., not participating. Present — Gorski, J.P., Martoche, Green, Fine and Hayes, JJ.
ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Served: April 22, 2015 

In the Matter of: 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-0636 

TRIUMPH GROUP OPERATIONS, INC. 

d/b/a/ TRIUMPH ACCESSORY SERVICES, 

Respondent. 

Judge Robert C. Goodwin 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S 

FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

COMES NOW the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), acting by and through its 

counsel, and submits the following response to Respondent's discovery request. 

,. •' 

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

Respondent respectfully requests copies of the releasable portioqs of the Federal Aviation 

Administration's Enforcement Investigative Report ("EIR;') pertaining to the abovereferenced matter. 

RESPONSE: The releasable portions of the Enforcement Investigative Report for the 

pending matter are hereby provided. 

Dated this 22"d day of April2015. 

RECEIVED 

MAY!-· j 2015. 

HEARING DbCKET 

~enior Enforcement :Attorney 

'Federal Aviation Administration 

· 901,Locust Street, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

(816)320-3765; Fax(816) 329-771 

Attorney for Complainant 

1 
TRIUMPH GROUP OPERATIONS, INC. d/b/a/ TRIUMPH ACCESSORY 

SERVICES, FAA Docket No. F AA-2015-0636 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that I have this date sent the Complainant's Response to 

Respondent's First Request for Production of Documents, via methods listed, to the below 

named addressees: 

MarshallS. Filler, Esq. 

117 North Hemy Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314-2903 

(1 copy w/encl. via regular mail) 

The Honorable Richard C Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room Ell-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

(1 copy w/o encl. via regular mail) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 

(Original & 1 copy w/o encl. via regular mail; 

1 copy w/o encl. via facsimile to 202-493-5142) 

Dated this 22nd day April2015. 

2
§ 12.101 Functions and responsibilities of the Administrative Judge. The Administrative Judge shall be responsible for the fair and orderly conduct of the proceeding and shall have the authority: ( a ) To rule upon discovery-related motions, and to take such action pursuant to § 12.35 as is appropriate if a party fails to comply with a discovery order;
( b ) To issue orders for the production of documents and tangible things and orders for written testimony, as provided in § 12.34;
( c ) To issue subpoenas pursuant to § 12.34 and § 12.36;
( d ) To issue orders of default for good cause shown against any party who fails to participate in the proceeding, or to comply with any provisions of these rules;
( e ) To receive submissions of proof;
( f ) Make the final decision in accordance with § 12.106 of these rules; and
( g ) Issue such orders as are necessary and appropriate to effectuate the orderly conduct of the proceeding.
[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984; 49 FR 15070, Apr. 17, 1984, as amended at 78 FR 12937, Feb. 26, 2013; 86 FR 64356, Nov. 18, 2021]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26512]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 112604D]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Emergency Beacon Registrations.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0295.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 5,000.
    Number of Respondents: 20,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: An international system exists to use satellites to 
detect and locate ships, aircraft, or individuals in distress if they 
are equipped with an emergency radio beacon. Persons purchasing such a 
beacon must register it with NOAA. The data provided in the 
registration can assist in identifying who is in trouble and also 
suppressing the consequences of false alarms.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations; not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; 
State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea8ea293848f81aa8e8589c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1b3706111a143f1b101c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e6a4f58474a717c415d5a454b5c6e41434c004b415e00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6024011609043f320f13140b0512200f0d024e050f104e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 23, 2004.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26512 Filed 11-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-HR-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<page>

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Frattaroli, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vaso Active
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

November 14, 2007

By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
   ---------------------------
Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
§ 460.12 Labels. If you are a manufacturer, you must label all packages of your insulation. The labels must contain: ( a ) The type of insulation.
( b ) A chart showing these items: ( 1 ) For batts and blankets of any type: the R-value, length, width, thickness, and square feet of insulation in the package.
( 2 ) For all loose-fill insulation: the minimum settled thickness, initial installed thickness, maximum net coverage area, number of bags per 1,000 square feet, and minimum weight per square foot at R-values of 13, 19, 22, 30, 38, and 49. You must also give this information for any additional R-values you list on the chart. Labels for these products must state the minimum net weight of the insulation in the package. You must also provide information about the blowing machine and machine settings used to derive the initial installed thickness information.
( 3 ) For boardstock: the R-value, length, width, and thickness of the boards in the package, and the square feet of insulation in the package.
( 4 ) For reflective insulation: The number of sheets; the number and thickness of the air spaces; and the R-value provided by that system when the direction of heat flow is up, down, and horizontal. You can show the R-value for only one direction of heat flow if you clearly and conspicuously state that the insulation can only be used in that application.
( 5 ) For insulation materials with reflective facings, you must follow the rule in this section that applies to the material itself. For example, if you manufacture boardstock with a reflective facing, follow paragraph (b)(3) of this section. You can also show the R-value of the insulation when it is installed in conjunction with an air space. This is its “system R-value.” If you do this, you must clearly and conspicuously state the conditions under which the system R-value can be attained.
( 6 ) For air duct insulation: the R-value, length, width, thickness, and square feet of insulation in the package.
( c ) The following statement: “R means resistance to heat flow. The higher the R-value, the greater the insulating power.”
( d ) If installation instructions are included on the label or with the package, add this statement: “To get the marked R-value, it is essential that this insulation be installed properly. If you do it yourself, follow the instructions carefully.”
( e ) If no instructions are included, add this statement: “To get the marked R-value, it is essential that this insulation be installed properly. If you do it yourself, get instructions and follow them carefully. Instructions do not come with this package.”
[70 FR 31276, May 31, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 20789, May 13, 2019]
EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tally Ho Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jose M. Meleth, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      July
      25, 2006








Jose
      M.
      Meleth


Chief
      Financial Officer


Director
      & Secretary





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.