alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended annual report of Tranquility, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Dominick Pope, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Dominick Pope Dominick Pope, Principal Financial Officer Date: June 29, 2009
§ 204.39 Written decision. ( a ) *If pre-offset hearing is held.* Within 60 days of the filing of the employee's petition for a pre-offset hearing, the hearing official will issue a written decision setting forth the basis of his/her findings in accordance with 5 CFR 550.1104(g)(3).
( b ) If the employee challenges the pre-offset notice under § 204.34, Employee response and/or § 204.35, Petition for pre-offset hearing, without requesting a hearing or a hearing is denied, the program official must notify the employee of his/her final determination in writing before offset can begin. The agency's execution of a voluntary repayment agreement satisfies this requirement.
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 www.nrc.gov/OPA/

No. 96-65 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)

 CHAIRMAN OF UKRAINIAN PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE

 ON NUCLEAR SAFETY VISITS NRC

 Dr. Mykhailo Pavlovsky, chairman of the Committee on Nuclear

Policy and Safety of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (the Ukrainian

parliament) and four of his colleagues visited the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission Tuesday (May 7).

 They conferred with NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson; with

Commissioners Kenneth C. Rogers and Greta J. Dicus; and with

senior members of the agency staff. Discussion topics included

the NRC regulatory program, its legal basis, and the agency's

relationship with Congress.

 The visit grew out of a meeting last year in Kiev with

Chairman Jackson, who suggested that Dr. Pavlovsky come to the

United States to view first-hand how nuclear issues are dealt

with by various elements of the U. S. government, including

development of a regulatory framework rooted in U.S. law. 

Subsequently, the visit was arranged by the United States

Information Agency at NRC's suggestion. Since the late 1980s,

the U.S. has cooperated with Ukraine (formerly part of the Soviet

Union) in nuclear reactor safety. 

 While in this country, the delegation also has scheduled

meetings with officials and staff members of Congress, the

Department of Energy, state regulatory bodies in Minnesota, and

nuclear industry and public interest groups. The schedule also

includes trips to the Calvert Cliffs and Prairie Island nuclear

power plants.
### §15603. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15603 was editorially reclassified as section 30303 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 146.7 Content of systems of records. ( a ) The Commission will maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act and other purposes required to be accomplished by statute or by executive order of the President.
( b ) The Commission will maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity.
( c ) The Commission will collect information to the greatest extent practicable directly from the subject individual when the information may result in adverse determinations about an individual's rights, benefits, and privileges under Federal programs.
( d ) The Commission will maintain all records which are used by the Commission in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in the determination.
#### August Jacobs, Defendant in Error, v. Henry T. Jurgensen et al., trading as Jurgensen Tea Company, Henry T. Jurgensen, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,767.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh J. Kearns, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed December 31, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action of forcible entry and detainer by August Jacobs against Henry T. Jurgensen and John F. Jurgensen, trading as Jurgensen Tea Company. The action proceeded against Henry T. Jurgensen alone, the other party not being served, and it appearing that such other party had terminated business relations with the defendant. The premises involved were *68leased to the defendant under a lease providing for forfeiture if the rent remained unpaid after the first of the month. It appeared, however, that the check in payment of the rent was usually mailed by the defendant to the plaintiff a few days after the first, and on the occasion in question such monthly check was not received until thirteen days after the first of the month, when it was returned and these proceedings instituted. At the close of the trial a verdict was directed for the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant, Henry T. Jurgensen, brought error.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Landlord and tenant, § *470*
      ***
      *—when waiver of forfeiture will he presumed.*Where a lease provided that the landlord might declare a forfeiture of the same because of the failure of the lessee to pay the rent when due, such landlord had the right to waive the forfeiture, and waiver would be presumed until he did some act manifesting an intention to declare a forfeiture.

2. Appeal and error, § *913*—when stenographic report complete,*Where a certificate to the stenographic report states that it contains “all the evidence and testimony offered, heard or received on the hearing of the above entitled cause,” it cannot be contended that the report is not in fact complete.

John C. Trainor, for plaintiff in error.

G. A. Dahlberg, for defendant in error; Gurdon Williams, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0653

IN THE MATTER OF:

H.M.,

 A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 6 2023

01/06/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0653
```

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                   Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Centennial
Specialty Foods Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 15, 2003 (the "Report"), Jeffrey R. Nieder, as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

/s/ Jeffrey R. Nieder

Name: Jeffrey R. Nieder

Title:Chief Executive Officer

       Principal Executive
        Officer) and Chief
        Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial
      ( and Accounting Officer)

Date: February 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Centennial Specialty
Foods Corporation and will be retained by Centennial Specialty Foods
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```
### §16982. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16982 was editorially reclassified as section 20982 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
[Civil No. 282.]

#### TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. THE PERSONS , ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS, FIRMS, COMPANIES, and REAL ESTATE, LANDS and PROPERTY described in the Delinquent Tax List of the County of Apache for the year 1888. Appeal of ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Apache. James H. Wright, Judge.

*442William C. Hazledine, Solicitor, and J. A. Williamson and E. M. Sanford, for Appellant.

Clark Churchill, Attorney-General, and A. P. Banta, for Appellee.

January 13, 1892.

Dismissed on stipulation.
ENVIRONl\lENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 EPA-R08-0AR-2006-0013; FRL- Approval and Promulgation ofAir Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for Salt Lake County; Utah County; Ogden City PMIO Nonattainment Area 

### AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). l\CTIO!\: Prnposed rule: extension orthe comment period. 

### Sl:\1\IARY: 

### LPf\ is c.\tending the comment period Cor 

### a document pLlblished 

### on December I, .?O()9 (74 FR 6:27! 7). 

### In the December 

### L 200() document. 

### E:P;\ proposed to disapprove the 

### State
i)f 1.:1ah·s requc's1S uncler the Clean Air Act to redesignate the Salt Lake County, lJtah County. 

### and Ogden City PM]!) nonattainment areas to attainment. and to approve some and disapprove otbl:l' associated State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions. The Govemor ofUtah submitted the redesignation requests and associated SIP revisions on September

### 2,2005. EPA proposed to disapprove the redesignation requests because the areas do not meet 

### all Clean Air Act requirements for redesignation, At the request ofseveral com111entors, EPA is extending the cumnwnt period through March 

### 1. 20I

## n, DArES: ('omm('l1tc:**mu~t** 

### ht;? received on or belore March 

### 1. 20 j

### n. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments.**ick~ntifiecl** by Docket ID 

### No. EPA-R08-0AR-2006­ 

### uo 13. 

### by one ofthe following methods:
•**\\\~~".':~"l.:guhni~}ll?,go~,** 

### Follow the nn-line instructions 

### for submitting comments.
•**l'~-mai** 

### J:**videtich.callic(~;)epa,** gCl\'
• Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in FOR FURTHER

### INFORMATION CONTACT ifyou arc faxing comments).
• !V1ail: Callie Videtich. Director. Air Program. Environmental Protection Agcnc.v (FP;\). 

### Rcgi()11 R. \1:1ilcock 

### gp-AR. 1595 Wynkoop St.. 

### Denver. Colorado 80202­ 1 i29.


### • Hand Delivery: Callie Videtich. Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

### Region 8, 

### Mail Code 8P-AR. 1595 

### Wynkoop St.. 

### Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. 

### Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday. 8:00 a.m. 

### to 4:30 p.m.. 

### excluding Federal holidays. Specialarrangements should be made for deIiveries ofboxed information.

• F'lr 

### uddilional intlmnalion 011 

### submitting comments, see**thl,.~** 

### Decembl'f 

### 1. 2009 

### J.+ FR (2717) 

### notice. 

### FOR FVRTHER INFORMATION**CO~T** 

### ACT: Catherine Roberts. Air 

### Program, Mail Code gP-AR.l:nvirollmcnw! Protect1on 

### Agency 

### (EPA.), Region 

### 8. 1595 Wynkoop 

### St.. Denver.

fhted: 

### Carol Rushin Acting Reg10nal Administrator 

### Region 8

2
### §12756. Monitoring of compliance

#### (a) Enforceable agreements

Each participating jurisdiction, through binding contractual agreements with owners and otherwise, shall ensure long-term compliance with the provisions of this subchapter. Such measures shall provide for (1) enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter by the jurisdiction or by the intended beneficiaries, and (2) remedies for the breach of such provisions.

#### (b) Periodic monitoring

Each participating jurisdiction, not less frequently than annually, shall review the activities of owners of affordable housing assisted under this subchapter for rental to assess compliance with the requirements of this subchapter. Such review shall include on-site inspection to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations. The results of each review shall be included in the jurisdiction's performance report submitted to the Secretary under section 12708(a) of this title and made available to the public.

#### (c) Special procedures for certain projects

In the case of small-scale or scattered site housing, the Secretary may provide for such streamlined procedures for achieving the purposes of this section as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

(Pub. L. 101–625, title II, §226, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4114.)
Order entered February 25, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00057
- CV NOVO POINT, LLC, QUANTEC, LLC, RPV, LTD., AND JEFFREY BARON , Appellant s V. ELISSA KATZ , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 01898
- D

O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Coral L. Wa h len’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We note the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellants have not paid for it

. On February 5, 2021, we directed appellants to file, within ten days, written verification they had paid or made
arrang e ments to pay for the record. Although we cautioned th em that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal, they hav e not yet complied. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).Because the appeal cannot proceed without the clerk’s record, we ORDER

appellants to file the requested written verification of pay ment or payment arrangements no later than March 8 , 2021 . We caution appellants that failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See id.
We SUSPEND the deadline for filing the reporter’s record and DENY as premature M s. Wahlen’s extension request. The Court will set a new deadline after the clerk’s record is filed and the Court has determined its jurisdiction.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No. FAA - 20 13 - 0240 Directorate ID: 20 11 - SW - 060 -AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350 and AS355 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 911 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The proposed actions are intended to detect a loose nut or misaligned stop screw, which, if not corrected, could limit yaw authority, and consequently, result in loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 0 Labor per He licopter ( .7 work-hour x 

### $85/work

hour for the inspection, adjusting and painting) $34 per helicopter to inspect the locking of the stop screws; $17 to adjust the stop screws if needed; Painting a line would cost about $9. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 60, including the cost to adjust the stop screws. Total US Fleet Cost $ 54,660 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
Exhibit
10.1


AMENDMENT No. 2 TO
SUPPLY AGREEMENT No. SPM 254


This Amendment (“Amendment”),
effective as of January 1, 2007 is made by and between Genzyme Corporation
(including certain of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates as listed on Attachment A
of the Agreement) with a principal place of business at Genzyme Center, 500
Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 (“GENZYME”), and Invitrogen
Corporation with a principal place of business at 1600 Faraday Avenue,
Carlsbad, California 92008 (“SUPPLIER”).


WHEREAS, the
parties entered into an Supply Agreement dated 
 January 1, 2005 and attached
hereto as Exhibit A (the “Purchase and Supply Agreement”), and


WHEREAS, the
parties now wish to amend the Agreement in order to modify certain provisions
thereof;


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties agree as follows:


Section 1 shall be
amended to add the following definition:


1.9 “Hot List” means a list
of up to 50 high usage Research Products to be mutually determined by the
Parties.


Section 5.7 will be deleted
in its entirety and replaced by the following;


5.7 Pricing for
Research Products.


5.7.1 Current US prices
for SUPPLIER Research Products are set forth in SUPPLIER’s current catalog (“List
Price”). Each Selling Entity has a different catalog and the List Prices may
vary by country.  [**]


5.7.2 Effective January
1, 2007, price increases for all Research Products other than Research Products
on the Hot List shall be determined as follows: [**]


5.7.3 [**]


5.7.4  [**]


5.7.5 [**]


Except as stated above,
the existing terms of the Supply Agreement shall not be affected by this
Amendment and shall remain in full force and effect between the parties.  In the event that this Amendment is deemed
unenforceable by a court of law, the Supply Agreement shall remain valid and
enforceable as an agreement between the parties.


	
  Invitrogen Corporation

  	
   

  	
  Genzyme Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Bernd Brust

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Mark Bamforth

  	
   

  
	
  By: Bernd Brust

  	
   

  	
  Mark Bamforth

  
	
  Title: Senior
  VP, Global Sales

  	
   

  	
  Sr. Vice-Operation and Pharmaceuticals

  
	
  Date: June 25,
  2007

  	
   

  	
  Genzyme Corporate

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date: June 14,
  2007

  
					



 






[**] = Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.21a The Ethics Counsel. ( a ) The Ethics Counsel is responsible for administering the Commission's Ethics Program and for interpreting subpart M of this part and 5 CFR part 2635. The Ethics Counsel serves as Counselor to the Commission and its staff with regard to ethical and conflicts of interest questions and acts as the Commission's liaison on such matters with the Office of Human Resources, the Office of Government Ethics, the Office of the Inspector General, and the Department of Justice. When appropriate and subject to the authority of, and in consultation with, the Inspector General, the Ethics Counsel shall inquire into alleged violations of subparts C, F, and M of this part, and 5 CFR part 2635.
( b ) The Ethics Counsel shall: ( 1 ) Receive and review allegations of misconduct by a Commission employee that relate to the Commission's Ethics Program.
( 2 ) Refer matters involving management questions to Division Directors, Office Heads, or Regional Directors, and matters involving alleged or apparent employee misconduct to the Office of the Inspector General, except for matters involving alleged professional misconduct ultimately referable to state professional boards or societies, which the Ethics Counsel shall refer to the General Counsel.
( 3 ) Refer complaints that appear to involve a violation of Federal criminal statutes, and do not appear to be frivolous, to the Inspector General for referral to the Department of Justice under 28 U.S.C. 535.
( 4 ) Act as liaison with the Office of the Inspector General on matters that the Ethics Counsel has referred to that Office, and with state or local authorities on matters that, on occasion, the Ethics Counsel may refer to them.
( 5 ) Arrange for the review of proposed publications and prepared speeches under § 200.735-4(e).
( 6 ) Provide advice, counseling, interpretations, and opinions with respect to subparts C, F, and M of this part, and 5 CFR part 2635.
( 7 ) Draft rules and regulations as necessary to implement the Commission's Ethics Program.
[60 FR 14626, Mar. 20, 1995, as amended at 73 FR 32224, June 5, 2008; 76 FR 71449, Nov. 18, 2011; 79 FR 1735, Jan. 10, 2014; 86 FR 9443, Feb. 16, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.400 Open meetings.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, meetings of the Commission shall be open to public observation.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3870 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3870

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' 
                      Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2012

    Mr. Griffin of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, Mr. 
  Crawford, and Mr. Womack) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' 
                      Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NICKY ``NICK'' DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nicky 
`Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```