alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of 2007-2008 Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 
 2007-2008 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 

For the annual service period beginning on May 15, 2007, the date of the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders 
  

			
		
	Standard Fees	  	Description
	Annual Director Retainer	  	
	 - Stock Component
	  	- $50,000 valuation
		  	- Granted on May 15, 2007. Issued pursuant to Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”)
	 - Cash Component
	  	- $30,000
		
	 	  	 - Payable on or after May 15, 2007
  

		
	Board Meeting Fee	  	 - $2,200 per meeting attended in person
 - $1,100 per meeting attended telephonically
  

		
	Committee Meeting Fee	  	- $1,500 per Committee meeting attended in person
		  	- $750 per Committee meeting attended telephonically
		
	 	  	 - Meetings of the independent directors designated as meetings of the Committee of Independent Directors (the
“CID”) are to be compensated as a meeting of the Board, provided, however, meetings of the CID that are held in conjunction with Board meetings are not to be separately compensated.
  

		
	Committee Chairperson Annual Retainer	  	- $7,500 for the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, payable on or after May 15, 2007
		  	- $10,000 for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee, payable on or after May 15, 2007
		
	 	  	 - $15,000 for the chairperson of the Audit Committee, payable on or after May 15, 2007
  

		
	Chairman of the Board Retainer	  	 - $60,000
 - Payable on or after May 15, 2007
  

	 	  	 
		
	 Other
  
	  	 
	Deferred Compensation Plan	  	- Directors may defer receipt of their cash and stock compensation. Deferred cash amounts are accrued in a memorandum account that is credited with interest derived from the so-called General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Rate (4.69% in 2007). At the election of each director, cash deferrals of meeting fees and retainers may be converted to Common Stock of the Company with such stock issued pursuant to the 2006
Plan
		
	Conversion Program	  	 - At the election of each director, cash meeting fees and retainers may be converted into Common Stock of the
Company with such stock issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan
  

		
	Reimbursable Expenses	  	- Travel and related expenses incurred in connection with service on the Board of Directors and its Committees
		
	Matching Charitable Contributions	  	- Company will provide matching contributions to qualified charitable organizations up to $5,000 per director per year
#### In the Matter of Arthur Nurse, Appellant, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Appeal from an order in an article 78 proceeding which, in effect, sustains respondent’s determination that accommodations in appellant’s building are not rooming house accommodations and fixes the maximum rents therefor pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 36 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.
Searched for **https://www.ornl.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ornl.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
[Civil No. 244.]

#### P. W. STRAHAN, Appellee, v. J. R. KILPATRICK, Appellant.

APPEAL from the District Court of-the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. William W. Porter, Judge.

E. M. Sanford, for Appellant.

Rush & Wells, and Wilson & Norris, for Appellee.

January 25, 1889.

(Note hy Reporter.—The record shows, “Opinion filed,” hut none appears in the records of the office of the clerk of the supreme court.)

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.13b Director of the Office of Public Affairs.

The Director of the Office of Public Affairs is the chief public information officer for the Commission, and oversees activities that communicate the Commission's actions to those interested in or affected by them. The Director's responsibilities include serving as liaison with the news media, dissemination of information to the news media and to the general public, supervision of internal and some external publications and of audio-visual presentations. Responsibilities of the Director, and of the Director's staff, include special projects that may be deemed appropriate to communicate information on Commission actions.

[86 FR 9442, Feb. 16, 2021]
§ 971.201 Statement of financial resources. ( a ) *General.* The application must contain information sufficient to demonstrate to the Administrator pursuant to § 971.301 that, upon issuance or transfer of the permit, the applicant will have access to the financial resources to carry out, in accordance with this part, the commercial recovery program set forth in the applicant's commercial recovery plan.
( b ) *Specific.* In particular, the information on financial resources is expected to be general in nature but must include the likely sources and timing of funds to meet the applicant's scheduled expenditures in the recovery plan. These sources may include cash flow, reserves, and outside funding.
#### § 1210.1 Scope, application, and effective date.

This part 1210, a consumer product safety standard, prescribes requirements for disposable and novelty lighters. These requirements are intended to make the lighters subject to the standard's provisions resistant to successful operation by children younger than 5 years of age. This standard applies to all disposable and novelty lighters, as defined in § 1210.2, that are manufactured or imported after July 12, 1994.
#### Albert A. Newman, Defendant in Error, v. Newman Clock Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,193.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.

Reversed.

Opinion filed February 3, 1915.

Rehearing denied February 18, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Albert A. Newman against Newman Clock Company, a corporation, to recover monthly instalments of salary due under a written contract of employment. From a judgment on a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff for seven hundred and fifty dollars, defendant brings error.

Amos W. Marston, for plaintiff in error.

Elmer E. Jackson and Newman, Levinson, Becker & Cleveland, for defendant in error.

*344Abstract of the Decision.

1. Contracts, § *294*
      ***
      *—performance as condition precedent to recovery on.*Where a plaintiff causes the record to show that he elects to stand by his amended and supplemental bill and permits the same to be dismissed for want of jurisdiction at his costs and appeals on the record to reverse the order appealed from, it constitutes such a breach of his covenant to “forthwith discontinue” all suits against defendant as to preclude his recovery for salary on a written contract of employment containing such covenant for discontinuance of all suits.

2. Contracts, § *294*—sufficiency of performance to assert rights.*Where under a written contract of employment it is agreed that all suits brought by plaintiff against a. defendant corporation and its directors, or any of them, and by defendant corporation against said plaintiff shall be forthwith- discontinued without costs to either party as against the other, plaintiff will not be heard to'say that his appeal from an order of the Federal courts was to permit a proper adjudication as to the disposition of funds in the hands of a receiver, in an action by him to recover unpaid instalments of his salary.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. .

Me. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.
No. 15-076 November 17, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Meets Performance Goals;

Issues FY 15 Performance and Accountability Report

Nuclear reactor and materials licensees maintained their excellent safety record again during the 

fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Performance and 

Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2015, issued today. The report details the agency’s program and 

financial performance from Oct. 1, 2014, through Sept. 30, 2015. It reflects the agency’s achievement 

of its safety and security strategic goals and objectives, and their related performance indicators.

The report also points out the agency’s sound financial position and full compliance with laws 

governing federal spending. For the 12th consecutive year, an independent auditor found no material 

weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the agency’s financial statements.

The report finds that the agency improved its operational activities by continuing to invest in a 

skilled workforce. It looks back on the NRC’s achievements over the past year in licensing, oversight, 

rulemaking and research for reactors, nuclear materials, and waste safety. It also details the challenges 

ahead, which include market pressures on operating plants, continued compliance with evolving 

international standards and treaties, and forces beyond the NRC’s control such as initiatives of the 

legislative and executive branches.

“This report shows the NRC staff’s steadfast commitment to meeting the agency’s safety and 

security goals,” said Chairman Stephen Burns. “At the same time, we continue to do all we can to 

manage our resources efficiently and effectively.”

A copy of the full report can be found on the NRC’s website.
### §1442. Repealed. Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, §7, 68 Stat. 1026

Section, act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title VI, §607, 63 Stat. 441, related to housing census. See section 141 of Title 13, Census.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Jeff Gilford, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeff Gilford       
|                      |  |  |  | Jeff Gilford           
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
No: 14-042 July 22, 2014

CONTACT: 301-415-8200

 

NRC Commissioner William D. Magwood IV Announces Departure Date

NRC Commissioner William D. Magwood IV announced today he will step down from his position 

at the NRC effective at the close of business Aug. 31, 2014. He will assume his new position as the 

Director-General of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Nuclear 

Energy Agency (NEA) on Sept. 1. Magwood was initially sworn in to the Commission on April 1, 2010. 

His term was to run through June 2015.

Magwood has had a distinguished career in the nuclear field and in public service. Most notably, he 

was the longest-serving head of the United States’ civilian nuclear technology program, serving two 

Presidents and five Secretaries of Energy.

“It has been a rare honor to have been one of only 33 people to have served as an NRC 

Commissioner,” Magwood said. “The NRC is a truly outstanding organization that stands as a powerful 

model for nuclear safety organizations throughout the world. The mission of the NRC has engendered a 

culture of independence of decision-making, dedication to purpose, and commitment to excellence to which 

one would hope all regulators and staffs might aspire. Though my tenure with the NRC is coming to its end, 

I will remain a strong advocate for these values.” 

As he leaves the agency, Magwood expressed particular thanks to his Commission colleagues and to 

the NRC staff. 

“I am proud to have worked alongside a cadre of exceptional public servants dedicated to protecting 

public health and safety through a commitment to openness and independence,” he said. 

The NEA is a specialized subagency within the OECD comprised of 31 member countries. The NEA, 

with the support of its member countries, focuses on facilitating policy analyses, sharing information and 

experience amongst its members, developing cooperative research projects, and developing consensus 

positions on technical issues, including those relevant to nuclear safety regulators around the world. Its 

work is focused upon developing and maintaining the scientific, technical, and legal basis for ensuring that 

nuclear power, where it is used, is used in a safe, environmentally friendly, and economical manner. 

At OECD, Commissioner Magwood succeeds Luis Echávarri, who retired in April 2014 after 17 

years at the head of the NEA. 
Page | 2

“The work of an NRC Commissioner is often humbling, generally challenging, and always 

rewarding,” Magwood said. “I thank the Administration for the opportunity to serve and for the support I’ve 

received in moving to my next public service assignment. As my tenure draws to a close, I recall that I 

pledged during my confirmation to ‘do the right thing even when the right thing isn’t easy.’ I am proud to 

end my term with that commitment met.”
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo ALVARADO-SOTOMAYOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10374.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 5, 2007.*

Filed June 14, 2007.

*436William S. Wong, Esq., USSAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael B. Bigelow, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arturo' Alvarado-Sotomayor appeals from the 151-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Appellant contends that the district court erred by failing to provide reasons at sentencing for refusing to apply safety valve relief. We conclude that any error in this regard was harmless because the record at sentencing supports a finding that the safety valve provision does not apply. *See United States v. Diaz-Cardenas,*351 F.3d 404, 409 n. 5 (9th Cir.2003).

Appellant also contends that remand is required to afford him an opportunity to be debriefed by the government so that he may meet the safety valve eligibility requirement under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5). We reject this contention because nothing in the record indicates that appellant was prevented from providing the government the necessary information under this requirement prior to sentencing. *See United States v. Mejia-Pimental,*477 F.3d 1100, 1103-08 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that a written proffer to the government after previous failures to provide full disclosure may establish eligibility under § 3553(f)(5)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 23.2 Misuse of the terms “handmade,” “hand-polished,” etc. ( a ) It is unfair or deceptive to represent, directly or by implication, that any industry product is handmade or hand-wrought unless the entire shaping and forming of such product from raw materials and its finishing and decoration were accomplished by hand labor and manually-controlled methods which permit the maker to control and vary the construction, shape, design, and finish of each part of each individual product. Note to Paragraph ( a
):
As used herein, “raw materials” include bulk sheet, strip, wire, precious metal clays, ingots, casting grain, and similar items that have not been cut, shaped, or formed into jewelry parts, semi-finished parts, or blanks.
( b ) It is unfair or deceptive to represent, directly or by implication, that any industry product is hand-forged, hand-engraved, hand-finished, or hand-polished, or has been otherwise hand-processed, unless the operation described was accomplished by hand labor and manually-controlled methods which permit the maker to control and vary the type, amount, and effect of such operation on each part of each individual product.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Robert F. Kendall, Chief Financial Officer of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Biomass Processing Technology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and Ihave: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation;and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        August 22, 2005 /s/ Robert F. Kendall   Name:  Robert F. Kendall, CPA   Title:  Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
Exhibit 5



                                 August 24, 2000



The Coastal Corporation
Coastal Tower
Nine Greenway Plaza
Houston, TX   77046-0995

Gentlemen:

       I have acted as counsel to The Coastal Corporation (the "Company") in
connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company for the
registration of (i) Deferred Compensation Obligations in the Company's Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors (the "Deferred Compensation Plan") and (ii)
250,000 shares of the common stock, par value $.331/3 per share, of the Company
(the "Common Stock") offered in connection with the Company's 1997 Directors
Stock Plan.

       In such capacity, I have familiarized myself with the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws, each as amended to date, of the Company and have
examined the originals, or copies certified or otherwise identified, of the
Plan, corporate records of the Company, certificates of public officials and
representatives of the Company, statutes and other instruments and documents as
the basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed.

       On the basis of the foregoing, I am of the opinion that:

       (1) The Company is a corporation, duly organized and validly existing, in
good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware.

       (2) The Plan has been duly authorized and executed by the Company and is
a legal and binding agreement of the Company in accordance with its terms.

       (3) The Common Stock, when purchased in accordance with the terms of the
Plan, will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

       I hereby consent to the use and filing of this opinion as an exhibit to
the Registration Statement. I further consent to all references to me in the
Registration Statement, any amendments thereto, or in any prospectus.

                                            Very truly yours,


                                            /S/ AUSTIN M. O'TOOLE
                                            Austin M. O'Toole