alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3687 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under the 

beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of 

certain disabled veterans for travel for certain special disabilities rehabilitation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Mr. COURTNEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under the beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of certain disabled veterans 

for travel for certain special disabilities rehabilitation, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3687 IH

1 SECTION 1. COVERAGE UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS BENEFICIARY TRAVEL PRO3 GRAM OF CERTAIN DISABLED VETERANS FOR 

4 TRAVEL FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL DISABILITIES 

5 REHABILITATION. 

6 Section 111(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara8 graph: 

9 ‘‘(G) A veteran with vision impairment, a vet10 eran with a spinal cord injury or disorder, or a vet11 eran with double or multiple amputations whose 

12 travel is in connection with in-patient care in a spe13 cial disabilities rehabilitation program of the Depart14 ment.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PR Specialists, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Ruden, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Lawrence Ruden

Lawrence Ruden,

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  July 28, 2009
March 1, 2016 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman, 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC), I am responding to the Joint 

Explanatory Statement that accompanied the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public 

Law 114-113). The Joint Explanatory Statement requested that the NRC submit a plan for 

making changes to the agency’s rulemaking process. I have enclosed the “Commission 

Involvement in the Early Stages of Rulemaking” report that responds to the direction in the Joint 

Explanatory Statement. 

 On February 3, 2016, the Commission issued a staff requirements memorandum (SRM) 

requiring the staff to submit a rulemaking plan for Commission review and approval before the 

initiation of any rulemaking that is not already explicitly delegated to the staff (Enclosure 1). The 

SRM directed the staff to make specific revisions to the rulemaking plan template to ensure that 

the template is in alignment with the items contained in the Joint Explanatory Statement. The 

revised template is attached to the enclosed report. 

 Please contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at 

301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosures: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Thad Cochran 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Mikulski
(September 19, 2006)

#### Donovan Bezer, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[821 NYS2d 550]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered April 5, 2005, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs claims for the alleged wrongful seizure *728and sale of his vehicle and transferred his lost property claim to Civil Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

This action challenging defendants’ seizure of plaintiffs vehicle to satisfy judgments rendered in connection with unpaid parking tickets, commenced more than four months after the vehicle was seized, is untimely. While plaintiffs notice of claim identified the claim as one “to recover damages for the conversion and/or trespass to chattel and/or embezzlement and/or unauthorized sale and/or unauthorized destruction of the personal property of Claimant,” it is clear from the record that his claims Eire those properly brought in a CPLR article 78 challenge to an administrative determination, which is subject to a four-month statute of limitations (CPLR 217). As the Supreme Court held, “plaintiff is attempting to use a plenary action at law to collaterally attack the underlying judgments and defendants’ decision to levy on plaintiffs property to satisfy such outstanding judgments.” Plaintiffs reliance on the City’s statements in the letters of July 19 and July 29, 2002, respectively acknowledging and disallowing his claim, that if he wished to pursue the claim, he could “bring a lawsuit against the City if it is started within one year and ninety days from the date of the occurrence,” is misplaced. Plaintiff misidentified this challenge to an administrative determination as a tort claim, and should not be heard to complain that the City lulled him into allowing the limitations period to run. We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Sullivan, GonzEilez and Sweeny, JJ.
### §13256. Technical and policy analysis

#### (a) Requirement

Not later than March 1, 1995, and March 1, 1997, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit to the President and the Congress a technical and policy analysis under this section. The Secretary shall utilize the analytical capability and authorities of the Energy Information Administration and such other offices of the Department of Energy as the Secretary considers appropriate.

#### (b) Purposes

The technical and policy analysis prepared under this section shall be based on the best available data and information obtainable by the Secretary under section 13253 of this title, or otherwise, and on experience under this subchapter and other provisions of law in the development and use of replacement fuels and alternative fueled vehicles, and shall evaluate—

(1) progress made in achieving the goals described in section 13252(b)(2) of this title, as modified under section 13254 of this title;

(2) the actual and potential role of replacement fuels and alternative fueled vehicles in significantly reducing United States reliance on imported oil to the extent of the goals referred to in paragraph (1); and

(3) the actual and potential availability of various domestic replacement fuels and dedicated vehicles and dual fueled vehicles.

#### (c) Publication

The Secretary shall publish a proposed version of each analysis under this section in the Federal Register for public comment before transmittal to the President and the Congress. Public comment received in response to such publication shall be preserved for use in rulemaking proceedings under section 13257 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title V, §506, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2891.)
#### Joseph De Smet, Respondent, *v.*Julian Benedict Niles, Appellant.

First Department,

November 17, 1916.

Motor vehicles — negligence — liability of owner for negligent operation of car by his brother.

The authority given by the owner of a car to his brother to take the same out whenever his mother wanted to go, does not render the owner liable for an accident resulting from the negligence of the brother while using the car at the request of the mother and without further authority from or notice to the owner.

Appeal by the defendant, Julian Benedict Niles, from a judgment of the County Court of Bronx county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 21th day of January, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury for $300, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*William W. Niles [Francis C. Nickerson*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Henry Waldman,*for the respondent.

Page, J.:

The action was to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of the alleged negligent operation of an automobile belonging to the defendant.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury on both propositions of the negligence of the driver of the automobile and the freedom from contributory negligence of the defendant. The serious question in this case, however, is as to liability. The defendant, a young man of about twenty-one or twenty-two years of age living with his father and mother, owned this car. William W. Niles, Jr., testified that his brother, the defendant, had forbidden him to take the car out alone, but that any time his mother wanted him to take her out, he could take her out in the car. On this occasion the mother had asked William to get the car for the purpose of taking her and a friend of the mother from their residence *823to the friend’s home in One Hundred and Sixteenth street. It appeared that the defendant was not consulted and gave no special permission for the use of the car on this trip. It is very evident that the car was not being used in the business of the defendant but solely for the purposes and pleasures of the mother, and the mere authority given to William to take the car out when his mother wished him to did not render the defendant liable. (See *Reilly*v. *Connable,*214 N. Y. 586; *Cunningham*v. *Castle,*127 App. Div. 580; *Tanzer*v. *Read,*160 id. 584; *Freibaum*v. *Brady,*143 id. 220; *Maher*v. *Benedict,*123 id. 579; *Heissenbuttel*v. *Meagher,*162 id. 752; *Clark*v. *Buckmobile Co.,*107 id. 120.)

The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3556 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3556

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
          the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2011

  Mr. Higgins (for himself, Ms. Hochul, Mr. Owens, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. 
 Hanna, Mr. Engel, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Israel, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Gibson, 
Mr. Meeks, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Rangel, Mr. King of New York, Ms. Hayworth, 
 Mr. Reed, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Bishop of New York, Ms. Clarke of New York, 
  Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Serrano, Mr. 
 Towns, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Grimm, Ms. Buerkle, Ms. Slaughter, and Mr. 
 Turner of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
          the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, New York 
shall be known and designated as the ``Robert H. Jackson United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert H. 
Jackson United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Angela Di Bella, Deceased. Florence Tanzini, as Administratrix of the Estate of Angelo Di Bella, Deceased, Respondent; Carmelo A. Rigono, as Administrator of the Estate of Angela Di Bella, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [199 Misc. 847.]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Work Stoppages in Contract Construction, 1962-73

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Soder, Jon. 						*Work Stoppages in Contract Construction, 1962-73 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1847*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4919,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
December 17, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 17th day of December, 2015.

10-15-00380-CV	KATHY HAIGHT v. TINA LEA HAIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY & AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GRADY MARTIN HAIGHT, DECEASED - ON APPEAL FROM THE 40TH DISTRICT COURT OF ELLIS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 90178 – DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that Appellant Kathy Haight pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 68973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26151]



[[Page 68973]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-910-05-1040-PH-24-1A]


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Call for Nominations; Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Call for 
Nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) (43 U.S.C. 
1730) directs the Secretary of the Interior to involve the public in 
planning and issues related to management of lands administered by the 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Section 309 of FLPMA directs the 
Secretary to select 10 to 15 member citizen-based advisory councils, 
which are consistent with the requirements of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA). As required by FACA, Resource Advisory Council 
(RAC) membership must be balanced and representative of the various 
interests concerned with the management of the public lands. The BLM 
regulations governing RACs are found at 43 CFR part 1784.
    The BLM Utah State Director is issuing a call for nominations for a 
position on the advisory council. There is a vacant seat in Category 
Three (representing Holders of State, county, or local elected office; 
employees of a State agency responsible for management of natural 
resources; members of an Indian Tribe; academicians involved in natural 
sciences; and the public-at-large). Upon appointment, the individual 
selected to this position will fill the seat until September 19, 2007, 
the remainder of this position's term.

DATES: BLM will accept public nominations until December 27, 2004. 
Applicants are requested to submit a completed nomination form and 
nomination letters to the address listed below no later than December 
27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherry Foot, Special Programs 
Coordinator, Utah State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 324 South 
State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111; phone (801) 539-4195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Individuals may nominate themselves or 
others. Nominees must be residents of Utah. BLM will evaluate nominees 
based on their education, training, experience, and their knowledge of 
the geographical area of the RAC. Nominees should demonstrate a 
commitment to collaborative resource decision making.
    The following must accompany nominations:
    <bullet> Letters of reference from represented interest or 
organizations,
    <bullet> A completed background information nomination form 
(contact Sherry Foot at (801) 539-4195 to obtain a nomination form); 
and
    <bullet> Any other information that highlights the nominee's 
qualifications.
    The BLM Utah State Office will issue a press release, providing 
additional information, on November 26, 2004.

    Dated: October 14, 2004.
Sally Wisely,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 04-26151 Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
§ 300.24 Representations as to fiber content. ( a ) Words, coined words, symbols, or depictions which constitute or imply the name or designation of a fiber which is not present in the product shall not appear on labels. Any word or coined word which is phonetically similar to the name or designation of a fiber or which is only a slight variation in spelling from the name or designation of a fiber shall not be used in such a manner as to represent or imply that such fiber is present in the product when the fiber is not present as represented.
( b ) Where a word, coined word, symbol, or depiction which connotes or implies the presence of a fiber is used on any label, whether required or non-required, a full fiber content disclosure with percentages shall be made on such label in accordance with the Act and regulations. Where a word, coined word, symbol, or depiction which connotes or implies the presence of a fiber is used on any hang-tag attached to a wool product that has a label providing required information and the hang-tag provides non-required information, such as a hang-tag providing information about a particular fiber's characteristics, the hang-tag need not provide a full fiber content disclosure; however, if the wool product contains any fiber other than the fiber identified on the hang-tag, the hang-tag must disclose clearly and conspicuously that it does not provide the product's full fiber content; for example:
“This tag does not disclose the product's full fiber content.” or “See label for the product's full fiber content.” [29 FR 6626, May 21, 1964, as amended at 50 FR 15106, Apr. 17, 1985. Redesignated at 63 FR 7517, Feb. 13, 1998, as amended at 79 FR 32164, June 4, 2014]
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3663 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission to minimize infringement on the exercise and enjoyment 

of property rights in issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. HURT (for himself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, and Mr. 

LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission to minimize infringement 

on the exercise and enjoyment of property rights in 

issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Home 

5 Owner Rights Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HYDROPOWER LICENSES. 

7 (a) Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 797(e)) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3663 IH

1 (1) by designating the first, second, and third 

2 sentences as paragraphs (1) through (3) respec3 tively; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (3) (as so designated)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘recreational 

6 opportunities,’’; and 

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘, and minimizing in8 fringement on the useful exercise and enjoy9 ment of property rights held by nonlicensees’’ 

10 after ‘‘aspects of environmental quality’’. 

11 (b) Section 10 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

12 803) is amended— 

13 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘, includ14 ing minimizing infringement on the useful exercise 

15 and enjoyment of property rights held by non16 licensees’’ after ‘‘section 4(e)’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(k) PRIVATE LANDOWNERSHIP.—In developing any 

19 recreational resource within the project boundary, the li20 censee shall consider private landownership as a means to 

21 encourage and facilitate— 

22 ‘‘(1) private investment; and 

23 ‘‘(2) increased tourism and recreational use.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS