alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §14115. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14115 was editorially reclassified as section 12575 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00153

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.H. AND G.F.H.,

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texa s

Trial Court No. 2016PA01945

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due on September 24, 2018

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, C lerk of Court
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-061 November 7, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $60,000 FINE AGAINST U. S. ENRICHMENT CORP.

FOR FAILING TO PROTECT CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AT PADUCAH PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $60,000 fine against the U. S.

Enrichment Corporation (USEC) for failing to properly protect classified information at the Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, which the company operates at Paducah, Kentucky.

USEC was cited for failing to store classified information in a properly secured storage system

between October 5 and December 17 of last year. The company was cited for a second violation

involving six instances last year and in June of this year in which classified information was

transmitted on a telecommunications system which had not been approved for classified information.

The gaseous diffusion plant processes uranium for use in fuel in nuclear power plants. Certain

aspects of the uranium enrichment process are considered classified information which must be

properly protected from unauthorized disclosure.

In notifying the company of the proposed fine, NRC Regional Administrator Jim Dyer said,

“While no compromise of classified information appears to have occurred, the violations are

significant in that the information was not properly secured and could have resulted in individuals

without the appropriate security clearance obtaining access to classified information.”

The company has until December 5 to pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request hearing.

The letter notifying the company of the proposed fine and the associated Notice of Violation

will be available on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions/materials/ and from the NRC’s

Region III Office of Public Affairs. It will also be available in the agency’s ADAMS electronic

reading room: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

# # #
Issue Date: 06/24/15 1 15-012 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 15-012

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 2515 Appendix C 06/11/14 IMC 2515 Appendix C 06/24/15 

2. IP 65001.14 07/29/08 IP 65001.14 06/24/15 

3. TI 2515/186 08/30/12 

4. TI 2515/189 09/25/13 

TRAINING: No 

REMARKS: IMC 2515 Appendix C, “Special and Infrequent Inspections,” has been revised to 

add IP 60715, which is reserved for spent fuel safety at operating reactors, clarify 

introductory text and incorporate recommendations in feedback form 2515C2123. 

 IP 65001.14, “Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Complex Systems with 

Multiple Components,” has been revised as a periodic update. 

 TI 2515/186, “Inspection of Procedures and Processes for Responding to 

Potential Aircraft Threats,” has been deleted. This TI has been completed. 

 TI 2515/189, “Inspection to Determine Compliance of Dynamic Restraint 

(Snubber) Program with 10 CFR 50.55a, "Regulatory Requirements for Inservice 

Examination and Testing of Snubbers,” has been deleted. This TI has been 

completed. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard. 

END
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Kyle A. Wilson 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
### §1502a. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–861, §36A, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1569

Section, act July 15, 1955, ch. 368, title V, §509, 69 Stat. 351, related to acquisition of housing units for military personnel and dependents. See section 2678 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### § 9.8 Amendment or revision of voluntary energy conservation specifications.

The Secretary may by order amend or revise any Specification published under § 9.4. The procedure applicable to the establishment of a Specification under § 9.4 shall be followed in amending or revising such Specification. Such amendment or revision shall not apply to appliances or equipment manufactured prior to the effective date of the amendment or revision.
Schedule of Executive Officers Party to the 2007 Change in Control Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PARTY TO THE 
 2007 CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT FILED AS EXHIBIT 10.1

 Each of the parties identified below is party to a change in control agreement (“2007 CIC Agreement”) with Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.
substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. for the quarter ended June 29, 2007: 
  

					
	Name of Executive	 	 Benefit Level Under
 Section 6 of the
 2007 CIC
Agreement
	 	 Benefit Level Under
 Section 8 of the
 2007 CIC Agreement

	 Angelo Rago
	 	Two Times	 	Two Times
§ 904.300 Scope and applicability. ( a ) This subpart sets forth procedures governing the suspension, revocation, modification, and denial of permits. The bases for sanctioning a permit are set forth in § 904.301. ( 1 ) *Revocation.* A permit may be cancelled, with or without prejudice to issuance of the permit in the future. Additional requirements for issuance of any future permit may be imposed.
( 2 ) *Suspension.* A permit may be suspended either for a specified period of time or until stated requirements are met, or both. If contingent on stated requirements being met, the suspension is with prejudice to issuance of any permit until the requirements are met.
( 3 ) *Modification.* A permit may be modified, as by imposing additional conditions and restrictions. If the permit was issued for a foreign fishing vessel under section 204(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, additional conditions and restrictions may be imposed on the application of the foreign nation involved and on any permits issued under such application.
( 4 ) *Denial.* Issuance of a permit in the future may be denied through imposition of a permit denial.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act of 1992, as amended (51 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*), or to the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act (30 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.*). Regulations governing denials of licenses issued under the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act of 1992, as amended (51 U.S.C. 60101 *et seq.*), appear at 15 CFR part 960. Regulations governing sanctions and denials of permits issued under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act (30 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.*) appear at 15 CFR part 970.
[87 FR 38941, June 30, 2022]
No: 16-034 June 13, 2016

Contact: Stephanie West, 301-415-8200

NRC Names Kimberly A. Howell Director of Office of Investigations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the selection of Kimberly Howell as 

director of the Office of Investigations (OI). The OI is responsible for developing policy, procedures, 

and quality control standards, and investigating licensees, applicants, and their contractors or vendors.

She replaces Cheryl McCrary, who retired. 

“Kimberly Howell brings more than 20 years of federal law enforcement experience to NRC’s 

investigations program and law enforcement liaison activities,” said Victor McCree, Executive Director 

for Operations. “We are pleased she is joining us.”

Howell comes to the NRC from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Office of the 

Inspector General, where she served in the Senior Executive Service (SES) as deputy assistant inspector 

general for investigations since 2011. Before her SES appointment, Howell held increasingly 

responsible federal law enforcement positions with OPM, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the 

U.S. Postal Service and the U.S. Secret Service. She began her federal law enforcement career with the 

Secret Service in 1993. 

Howell holds a bachelor’s degree in administration of justice from Howard University and a 

graduate certificate in inspector general leadership from American University.
#### § 10.69 Reopening hearings.

Any party may petition the Administrative Law Judge to reopen a hearing to adduce additional evidence at any time prior to issuance of the initial decision. The petition shall show that the evidence sought to be adduced is relevant and material and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce such evidence at the time of the original hearing.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Isidore Lipschutz et al., Appellants, and Albert Gutwirth, Respondent.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00032-CR

Sebastian GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4903

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The original due date for appellant’s brief was March 1, 2018. On February 26, 2018, 

appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, requesting a sixty day extension.

In his motion, appellant states he has been unable to confer with the State regarding this case and 

needs more time to prepare the brief.

After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time to file his 

brief and ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before April 30, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANCIS SOUTH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 633 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 1211.25 Product certification and labeling by importers. ( a ) *General.* The importer of any automatic residential garage door operator subject to the standard in subpart A of this part must issue the certificate of compliance required by section 14(a) of the CPSA and § 1211.24 of this subpart. If testing of each operator, or a reasonable testing program, meeting the requirements of this subpart has been performed by or for the foreign manufacturer of the product, the importer may rely in good faith on such tests to support the certificate of compliance provided the importer is a resident of the United States or has a resident agent in the United States and the records of such tests required by § 1211.31 of subpart C of this part are maintained in the United States.
( b ) *Responsibility of importer.* If the importer relies on tests by the foreign manufacturer to support the certificate of compliance, the importer bears the responsibility for examining the records supplied by the manufacturer to determine that the records of such tests appear to comply with § 1211.31 of subpart C of this part.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Safety Culture Policy Statement - Implementation Plan Update, June 2015.

Accession Number: ML15180A154

Date Released: Monday, June 29, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15180A150 - Safety Culture Policy Statement - Implementation Plan Update, June 2015. (16 page(s), 6/30/2015)
    - ML15180A147 - Summary of Safety Culture Policy Statement - Implementation Plan Update, June 2015. (2 page(s), 6/29/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### Part B—Federal Assistance for State and Local Programs
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

AUG 21 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

Thru: 

Posting EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563 to Regulations.gov for Public Access 

Carla Oldham :({_/d . .c) cJ !~:l£z_("<J~-

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS ---

Anna Marie Wood, Director OuVLW).)-:2-~­ Air Quality Policy Division, OAQPS 

This memorandum authorizes the posting ofEPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563 to Regulations.gov for public 

access. 

The subject docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0563) supports a Federal Register notice to be 

published titled, "Notice of Final Action on Petition From Sierra Club to Redesignate Newly Violating 

Ozone Areas as Nonattainment." This Federal Register will announce that the EPA has responded to a 

petition from the Sierra Club in letters to the signatories of the petition and will provide details of the 

docket document ID numbers of the incoming petition and the response letters signed on August 14, 

2014. 

There is no comment period associated with this Federal Register notice. Publication of the Federal 

Register notice will start the 60-day clock for filing petitions for review of the response letters. 

Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eric Shultz at (202) 566-

1883, or via email at schultz. eric@epa.gov. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w~h Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsurner)
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sky Power Solutions Corp. (the “Company”)  on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I Mehboob Charania, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.





/s/ Mehboob Charania


Mehboob Charania


Chief Executive Officer and


December 15, 2011           Principal Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.30-13 Delegation of authority to Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 78d-1 and 78d-2, the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby delegates, until the Commission orders otherwise, the following functions to the Chief Financial Officer, to be performed by the Chief Financial Officer or under the Chief Financial Officer's direction by such person or persons as may be designated from time to time by the Chairman of the Commission: ( a ) The compromise and collection of federal claims as required by the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended and recodified at 31 U.S.C. 3701-3720, in conformance with standards and procedures jointly promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General of the United States in 31 CFR Parts 900-904.
( b ) The administration of filing fee account procedures and policies established in § 202.3a of this chapter.
( c ) Pursuant to section 21F(g)(4) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u-6(g)(4)), the making of requests to the Secretary of the Treasury to invest the portion of the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Protection Fund that is not, in the Secretary of the Treasury's discretion, required to meet the current needs of the fund, and the determination of the maturities for those investments suitable to the needs of the fund.
[68 FR 50954, Aug. 22, 2003, as amended at 76 FR 60372, Sept. 29, 2011; 79 FR 59105, Oct. 1, 2014; 86 FR 9447, Feb. 16, 2021]
§ 165.12 Payment of awards from the Fund, financing of customer education initiatives, and deposits and credits to the Fund. ( a ) The Commission shall pay awards to whistleblowers from the Fund.
( b ) The Commission shall deposit into or credit to the Fund: ( 1 ) Any monetary sanctions collected by the Commission in any covered judicial or administrative action that is not otherwise distributed, or ordered to be distributed, to victims of a violation of the Commodity Exchange Act underlying such action, unless the balance of the Fund at the time the monetary sanctions are collected exceeds $100,000,000. In the event the Fund's value exceeds $100,000,000, any monetary sanctions collected by the Commission in a covered judicial or administrative action that is not otherwise distributed, or ordered to be distributed, to victims of violations of the Commodity Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder underlying such action, shall be deposited into the general fund of the U.S. Treasury.
( 2 ) In the event that the amounts deposited into or credited to the Fund under paragraph (b)(1) of this section are not sufficient to satisfy an award made pursuant to § 165.7, then, pursuant to Section 23(g)(3)(B) of the Commodity Exchange Act; ( i ) An amount equal to the unsatisfied portion of the award;
( ii ) Shall be deposited into or credited to the Fund;
( iii ) From any monetary sanction collected by the Commission in any judicial or administrative action brought by the Commission under the Commodity Exchange Act, regardless of whether it qualifies as a “covered judicial or administrative action”; *provided,* however, that such judicial or administrative action is based on information provided by a whistleblower.
( c ) *Office of Public Affairs.* The Commission shall undertake and maintain customer education initiatives through its Office of Customer Education and Outreach. The initiatives shall be designed to help customers protect themselves against fraud or other violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, or the rules or regulations thereunder. The Commission shall fund the initiatives and may utilize funds deposited into the Fund during any fiscal year in which the beginning (October 1) balance of the Fund is greater than $10,000,000. The Commission shall budget, on an annual basis, the amount used to finance customer education initiatives, taking into consideration the balance of the Fund.
[76 FR 53200, Aug. 25, 2011, as amended at 82 FR 24500, May 30, 2017; 89 FR 71820, Sept. 4, 2024]
June 14, 1949.

#### Harry Cohen et al., Copartners Doing Business as Canal Brass & Supply Co., Respondents, *v.*Mario P. Cerame, Appellant et al., Defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

There was no meeting of the minds between the parties as to what was to be sold. In its circular offer defendant set forth that it had for sale “Haval Brass Rod.” Plaintiffs’ order was for a quality known as “free cutting brass rod ”, a type of brass which was not included in defendant’s offer of sale. Moreover, plaintiffs wanted immediate delivery whereas defendant only agreed to deliver when and if it received the merchandise from the War Assets Administration. All the correspondence in the case shows that the parties were not negotiating for the same thing or upon the same terms.

When defendant received plaintiffs’ order to buy he wrote a letter setting forth that its offer to deliver was conditioned upon receipt of the materials from the War Assets Administration. Plaintiffs knew that the material ordered was coming from the War Assets Administration; that often the latter did not ship materials supposedly sold to a bidder; and that the merchandise here could not be delivered to them unless and until defendant received it. Concededly, the brass rod was never received by defendant from the War Assets Administration. Accordingly, defendant was under no obligation to deliver any of the material ordered. *(Shields*v. *Pettie,*4 N. Y. 122; *Kirsch & Co.*v. *Benyunes,*105 Misc. 648, opinion by Lehman, J., affd. 191 App. Div. 904.)

The judgment should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., concurs on the ground that there was no meeting of the minds as to delivery.

Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed. Settle order on notice.
#### Sarah Aiello v. George Ehret.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
§ 165.4 Confidentiality. ( a ) *In general.* Section 23(h)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act requires that the Commission not disclose information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower, except that the Commission may disclose such information in the following circumstances, in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a): ( 1 ) When disclosure is required to a defendant or respondent in connection with a public proceeding that the Commission institutes or in another public proceeding that is filed by an authority to which the Commission provides the information, as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or
( 2 ) When the Commission determines that it is necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act and to protect customers, it may provide whistleblower information, without the loss of its status as confidential whistleblower information in the hands of the Commission, to: The Department of Justice; an appropriate department or agency of the Federal Government, acting within the scope of its jurisdiction; a registered entity, registered futures association, or a self-regulatory organization (as defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); a State attorney general in connection with a criminal investigation; any appropriate State department or agency, acting within the scope of its jurisdiction; or a foreign futures authority; and, as set forth in section 23(h)(2)(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act, each such entity is required to maintain the information as confidential in accordance with the requirements of section 23(h)(2)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act.
( 3 ) The Commission may make disclosures in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
( b ) *Anonymous whistleblowers.* A whistleblower may anonymously submit information to the Commission, however, the whistleblower must follow the procedures in § 165.3(c) for submitting original information anonymously. Such whistleblower who anonymously submits information to the Commission must also follow the procedures in § 165.7(c) in submitting to the Commission an application for a whistleblower award.
[76 FR 53200, Aug. 25, 2011, as amended at 82 FR 24497, May 30, 2017]
#### § 150.7 [Reserved]