alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 202.1 General. ( a ) The statutes administered by the Commission provide generally ( 1 ) for the filing with it of certain statements, such as registration statements, periodic and ownership reports, and proxy solicitation material, and for the filing of certain plans of reorganization, applications and declarations seeking Commission approvals;
( 2 ) for Commission determination through formal procedures of matters initiated by private parties or by the Commission;
( 3 ) for the investigation and examination of persons and records where necessary to carry out the purposes of the statutes and for enforcement of statutory provisions; and
( 4 ) for the adoption of rules and regulations where necessary to effectuate the purposes of the statutes.
( b ) In addition to the Commission's rules of practice set forth in part 201 of this chapter, the Commission has promulgated rules and regulations pursuant to the several statutes it administers (parts 230, 240, 260, 270 and 275 of this chapter). These parts contain substantive provisions and include as well numerous provisions detailing the procedure for meeting specific standards embodied in the statutes. The Commission's rules and regulations under each of the statutes are available in pamphlet form upon request to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
( c ) The statutes and the published rules, regulations and forms thereunder prescribe the course and method of formal procedures to be followed in Commission proceedings. These are supplemented where feasible by certain informal procedures designed to aid the public and facilitate the execution of the Commission's functions. There follows a brief description of procedures generally followed by the Commission which have not been formalized in rules.
( d ) The informal procedures of the Commission are largely concerned with the rendering of advice and assistance by the Commission's staff to members of the public dealing with the Commission. While opinions expressed by members of the staff do not constitute an official expression of the Commission's views, they represent the views of persons who are continuously working with the provisions of the statute involved. And any statement by the director, associate director, assistant director, chief accountant, chief counsel, or chief financial analyst of a division can be relied upon as representing the views of that division. In certain instances an informal statement of the views of the Commission may be obtained. The staff, upon request or on its own motion, will generally present questions to the Commission which involve matters of substantial importance and where the issues are novel or highly complex, although the granting of a request for an informal statement by the Commission is entirely within its discretion.
[25 FR 6736, July 15, 1960, as amended at 76 FR 71875, Nov. 21, 2011]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00523-CR

Jose MORENO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. NM182574

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Magistrate Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 28, 2013

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

Jose Moreno filed a pro se notice of appeal from the Magistrate’s July 15, 2013 ruling that 

Moreno is competent to stand trial. A competency hearing is an ancillary proceeding, and a 

competency order is not a final judgment. Morales v. State, 801 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

1990), aff’d, 830 S.W.2d 139, 140 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (per curiam). A preliminary finding 

that defendant is competent to stand trial is not appealable until after the trial on the merits. Id.; 

Celani v. State, 940 S.W.2d 327, 329 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, pet. ref’d). 
04-13-00523-CR

On August 5, 2013, we ordered appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s trial attorney has filed a response in which he 

concurs that there has been no appealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
5317.7505 Limitations on Price Increases

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5317.75 — ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 11 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00534

- CV

JASON FRANCIS , Appellant

V.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS , INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND WELLS FARGO BANK, NA TIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUS TEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC., TRUST 2005

- WMC, MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005

- WMC6 , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 71266

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 17 , 201 3

. On January 16, 2014, appellant was ordered to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record in this appeal on or before January 31, 2014, or the appeal would be dismissed fo r want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).2

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26571]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P077]


State of Alaska

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for 
Public Assistance on November 15, 2004, the U.S. Small Business 
Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private 
non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a 
governmental nature. I find that the Bering Strait Regional Education 
Attendance Area and Northwest Arctic Borough in the State of Alaska 
constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by a severe winter 
storm, tidal surges and flooding occurring on October 18 through 20, 
2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this 
disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 14, 2005, 
at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. 
Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 419004, 
Sacramento, CA 95841-9004.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.900
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      4.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P07706.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008).

    Dated: November 19, 2004.
Allan I. Hoberman,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-26571 Filed 12-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §14043b–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043b–2 was editorially reclassified as section 12443 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26807]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATES: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on December 9, 
2004, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the 
Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> November 18, 2004 (Open).

B. Reports

    <bullet> Farm Credit System Building Association Quarterly Report.
    <bullet> Corporate Report.
    <bullet> FCS of America Termination Summary.

C. New Business--Regulations

    <bullet> Governance--Proposed Rule.

Closed Session*

    <bullet> OSMO Quarterly Report.

    *Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).


    Dated: December 2, 2004.
Jeanette C. Brinkley,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26807 Filed 12-2-04; 11:04 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
August 15, 2016 

The Honorable Sean Patrick Maloney 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Maloney: 

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your

letter of June 17, 2016, in which you expressed concerns regarding restart of Indian Point

Energy Center (Indian Point) Unit 2 and the need for a safety review of Indian Point Unit 3 in 

light of failed baffle-former bolts in Unit 2. 

Entergy Nuclear Operations (Entergy) completed a root-cause analysis and took 

actions to address the degraded bolts before Indian Point Unit 2 restarted on June 14, 2016. 

After conducting our own independent review of Entergy’s analysis and verifying the 

licensee’s corrective actions, the NRC did not have an immediate safety concern that would 

have prevented the unit from restarting. 

While baffle bolt failure is not a new or unknown phenomenon, the number of these 

failures found during the inspections at Indian Point 2 was beyond what the NRC would have 

expected. I want to update you on the actions taken to date at the site. Entergy performed 

ultrasonic testing on the reactor vessel internal bolts to look for degradation known to be 

caused by irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking. Entergy replaced all the bolts that 

were identified as flawed at Indian Point Unit 2 using bolts with material properties less 

susceptible to corrosion. No flaws were identified through ultrasonic testing of the remaining 

bolts. The NRC staff’s independent assessment of this issue has included review of analyses 

performed by the original equipment vendor and past industry experience with such bolting 

replacements. 

Regarding Indian Point Unit 3, Entergy has performed an evaluation to determine 

whether it is safe to continue operation of that reactor. Indian Point Unit 3’s baffle bolts were 

exposed to less radiation than the bolts in Unit 2 in part because Unit 3 has a different 

operating history and less operating time than Unit 2. In addition, there are no current 

indications of loose parts or fuel leaks that would indicate significant problems with the baffleformer bolts in Indian Point Unit 3. The NRC is currently performing an independent review of 

the licensee’s evaluation, but to date has not identified an immediate safety concern. 

Nevertheless, Entergy has since stated that it will perform an ultrasonic examination of Unit 3 

bolts in the spring 2017 refueling outage, rather than the spring 2019 refueling outage, as 

originally planned. 

The Commission shares your interest in ensuring that the Indian Point units operate in a 

manner that protects public health and safety. Please be assured that the NRC will continue 
- 2 - 

to closely monitor this situation, remain alert to potential generic implications, and evaluate the

need for further regulatory action. If you have any questions, please contact me or Eugene

Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns
§ 436.10 Other laws and rules. ( a ) The Commission does not approve or express any opinion on the legality of any matter a franchisor may be required to disclose by part 436. Further, franchisors may have additional obligations to impart material information to prospective franchisees outside of the disclosure document under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The Commission intends to enforce all applicable statutes and rules.
( b ) The FTC does not intend to preempt the franchise practices laws of any state or local government, except to the extent of any inconsistency with part 436. A law is not inconsistent with part 436 if it affords prospective franchisees equal or greater protection, such as registration of disclosure documents or more extensive disclosures.
§ 12.204 Amended and supplemental pleadings. ( a ) *Amendments to pleadings.* At any time before the parties have concluded their submission of proof, the Administrative Judge may allow amendments of the pleadings either upon written consent of the parties, or for good cause shown, provided however, that any pleading as amended shall not contain an allegation of damages in excess of $30,000. Any party may file a response to a motion to amend the pleadings within ten (10) days after the date of service upon that party of the motion.
( b ) *Supplemental pleadings.* At any time before the parties have concluded their submissions of proof, and upon such terms as are just, the Administrative Judge may, upon motion by a party, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions, occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the pleadings sought to be supplemented and which are relevant to any of the issues in the proceeding: *Provided however,* that any pleading as supplemented may not contain an allegation of damages in excess of $30,000. Any party may file a response to a motion to supplement the pleadings within ten (10) days after the date of service upon that party of the motion.
( c ) *Pleadings to conform to the evidence.* When issues not raised by the pleadings but reasonably within the scope of a summary decisional proceeding are tried with the express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings.
[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9637, Mar. 1, 1994; 86 FR 64356, Nov. 18, 2021]
### §1506. Administration of utilities and utility services; granting of easements

(a) Any Federal agency (including any wholly owned Government corporation) administering utility installations connected to a utility system for housing under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized—

(1) to continue to provide utilities and utility services to such housing as long as it is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary;

(2) to contract with the purchasers or transferees of such housing to continue the utility connection with such installations and furnish such utilities and services as may be available and needed in connection with such housing, for such period of time (not exceeding the period of Federal administration of such installations) and subject to such terms (including the payment of the pro rata cost to the Government or the market value of the utilities and services furnished, whichever is greater) as may be determined by the head of the agency;

(3) to dispose of such installations, when excess to the needs of the agency, and where not excess to grant an option to purchase, to the purchasers or transferees of such housing, for an amount not less than the appraised value of the installations and upon such terms and conditions as the head of the agency shall establish.

(b) Any Federal agency (including any wholly owned Government corporation) having under its jurisdiction lands across which run any part of a utility system for housing under the jurisdiction of the Secretary is authorized to grant to the Secretary, or to the purchasers or transferees of such housing, easements (which may be perpetual) on such land for utility purposes.

(June 28, 1948, ch. 688, §2, 62 Stat. 1063; Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of title II of act June 28, 1948, ch. 440, 54 Stat. 681, known as title II of the National Defense Expediting Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Public Housing Administration and Housing and Home Finance Agency (of which Public Housing Administration was a constituent agency) and of heads thereof transferred to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669, which is classified to section 3534(a) of this title. Section 9(c) of such act, set out as a note under section 3531 of this title, provided that references to Housing and Home Finance Agency or to any agency or officer therein are to be deemed to mean Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and that Housing and Home Finance Agency and Public Housing Administration have lapsed.
§ 143.5 Collection by compromise. The Commission may settle claims not exceeding $100,000 (excluding interest) by compromise at less than the principal amount of the claim if— ( a ) The debtor shows an inability to pay the full amount within a reasonable period of time;
( b ) The Government would be unable to enforce collection in full through litigation or administrative means within a reasonable period of time;
( c ) The cost of collecting the claim in full is not justified by the amount of the claim; or
( d ) The Commission's enforcement policy would be served by settlement of the claim for less than the full amount.
[50 FR 5384, Feb. 8, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 61292, Dec. 24, 1992]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,667]


Toro Irrigation, El Paso, TX; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, investigation was 
initiated on November 28, 2003 in response to a petition filed by a 
company official at Toro Irrigation, El Paso, Texas.
    The petitioner has asked that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of January 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2603 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
5339.7201-90  Data Servers/Centers Approval Process       Purchase Request packages for data servers/centers must include SAF/CIO A6 approval to be accepted as valid for procurement action by a contracting officer.          See DAFM 17-1301, *Computer Security, COMPUSEC, paragraph 2.9.1.3 & 3.6.1*   **Parent topic:** Part 5339 - Acquisition of Information Technology
Exhibit 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sean Miller, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Medallion Crest Management, Inc..;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

          a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

          b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

          c.   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          a.   all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

          b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  September 20, 2004

By: /s/ Sean Miller
    ----------------
    Sean Miller
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>