alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 802.80 Transitional rule for transactions investigated by the agencies.

§§ 801.2 and 801.50 shall not apply to any transaction that has been the subject of investigation by either the Federal Trade Commission or the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in which, prior to the effective date of that section, the reviewing agency obtained documentary material and information under compulsory process from all parties that would be required to submit a Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions under Section 801.50 but for this transitional rule.

[70 FR 11514, Mar. 8, 2005]
### §16359. Competitive award of management contracts

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary by this subchapter may be used to award a management and operating contract for a National Laboratory (excluding those named in subparagraphs (G), (H), (N), and (O) of section 15801(3) of this title), unless such contract is competitively awarded, or the Secretary grants, on a case-by-case basis, a waiver. The Secretary may not delegate the authority to grant such a waiver and shall submit to Congress a report notifying it of the waiver, and setting forth the reasons for the waiver, at least 60 days prior to the date of the award of such contract.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §995, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 914.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IX of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 856, which enacted this subchapter, amended sections 8101 and 8102 of Title 7, Agriculture, and section 5523 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, enacted provisions set out as notes under section 15801 of this title, section 8102 of Title 7, and section 2001 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining, and amended provisions set out as notes under section 8101 of Title 7 and section 1902 of Title 30. For complete classification of title IX to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15801 of this title and Tables.
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Commercial Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.Dated: October 31, 2006   /s/ David Gladstone   David Gladstone  Chief Executive Officer
§ 960.105 Officers and organization. ( a ) *By-Laws.* A Federal Executive Board shall adopt by-laws or other rules for its internal governance, subject to the approval of the Director. Such by-laws and other rules may reflect the particular needs, resources, and customs of each Federal Executive Board, provided that they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part or with the directives of the President or the Director. To the extent that such by-laws and other rules conflict with these provisions or the directives of the President or the Director, such by-laws and other rules shall be null and void.
( b ) *Chairman.* Each Federal Executive Board shall have a Chairman, who shall be elected by the members from among their number, and who shall serve for a term of office not to exceed one year.
( c ) *Staff.* As they deem necessary and proper, members shall, from time to time, designate personnel from their respective organizations to serve as the staff, or otherwise to participate in the activities, of the Federal Executive Board. Other personnel may be engaged, by appointment, contract, or otherwise, only with the approval of the Director.
( d ) Unless otherwise expressly provided by law, by directive of the President or the Director, or by the by-laws of the Federal Executive Board, every committee, subcommittee council, and other sub-unit of the Federal Executive Board, and every affiliation of the Federal Executive Board with external organizations, shall expire upon expiration of the term of office of the Chairman. Such a committee, subcommittee, council, other sub-unit, or affiliation may be reestablished or renewed by affirmative action of the Federal Executive Board.
( e ) *Board Actions.* Actions of a Federal Executive Board shall be taken only with the approval of a majority of the members thereof. This authority may not be delegated. All activities of a Federal Executive Board shall conform to applicable laws and shall reflect prudent uses of official time and funds.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIsolated Rotor Forward Flight Testing at Martian Atmospheric Density Data ReportWith the recent interest in Martian exploration using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), an experimental study was conducted to investigate rotor performance at Martian atmospheric conditions. Both simulation and testing of rotors is vital for evaluating rotor performance and behavior, especially for operations at Martian atmospheric densities and pressures. One critical test that has not been performed to date is helicopter forward flight testing at Martian atmospheric densities. To achieve this, a test was conducted in a tunnel facility that could be evacuated to the atmospheric pressure and density of Mars. A 40-inch-diameter rotor, roughly approximating the scale of the proposed Mars Helicopter (MH) design by the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), was tested in forward flight at Mars’ atmospheric pressure at the NASA Ames Planetary Aeolian Laboratory (PAL). In this forward flight testing, the drive system of the Martian Surface Wind Tunnel (MARSWIT) was never turned on; all wind speeds read were generated either through the rotor spinning or from facility effects. The goal of this experiment was to collect rotor thrust, rotational speed, power, torque, and acoustics measurements. Subsequently, these results can be used for correlation with simulated cases using a mid-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. As expected, rotor thrust and power are drastically reduced at air densities 100 times lower than at sea level on Earth. In addition, Reynolds number effects seem to play a vital role at reduced pressure that cannot be neglected in the simulation.Document ID20190025422Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAment, Geoffrey A.*(Science and Technology Corp. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Koning, Witold J. F.*(Science and Technology Corp. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Perez Perez, Brenda N.*(Science and Technology Corp. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 31, 2019Publication DateMay 1, 2019Subject CategoryAerodynamicsSpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR—2018–219736ARC-E-DAA-TN50403Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA16BD60CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Technical ReviewNASA Peer CommitteeKeywordsOne AtmosphereAtmospheric DensitiesIsolated RotorForward FlightTestingMartianAvailable DownloadsNameType20190025422.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §15100. Projects of national significance

#### (a) Study by the Secretary

The Secretary shall review Federal programs to determine the extent to which such programs facilitate or impede access to, provision of, and funding for family support services for families of children with disabilities, consistent with the policies described in section 15091 of this title.

#### (b) Projects of national significance

The Secretary shall make grants or enter into contracts for projects of national significance to support the development of national and State policies and practices related to the development and implementation, or expansion and enhancement, of family-centered and family-directed systems of family support services for families of children with disabilities.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title II, §211, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1733.)
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
§ 229.105 (Item 105) Risk factors. ( a ) Where appropriate, provide under the caption “Risk Factors” a discussion of the material factors that make an investment in the registrant or offering speculative or risky. This discussion must be organized logically with relevant headings and each risk factor should be set forth under a subcaption that adequately describes the risk. The presentation of risks that could apply generically to any registrant or any offering is discouraged, but to the extent generic risk factors are presented, disclose them at the end of the risk factor section under the caption “General Risk Factors.”
( b ) Concisely explain how each risk affects the registrant or the securities being offered. If the discussion is longer than 15 pages, include in the forepart of the prospectus or annual report, as applicable, a series of concise, bulleted or numbered statements that is no more than two pages summarizing the principal factors that make an investment in the registrant or offering speculative or risky. If the risk factor discussion is included in a registration statement, it must immediately follow the summary section required by § 229.503 (Item 503 of Regulation S-K). If you do not include a summary section, the risk factor section must immediately follow the cover page of the prospectus or the pricing information section that immediately follows the cover page. Pricing information means price and price-related information that you may omit from the prospectus in an effective registration statement based on Rule 430A (§ 230.430A of this chapter). The registrant must furnish this information in plain English. See § 230.421(d) of Regulation C of this chapter.
[85 FR 63761, Oct. 8, 2020]
#### Maria Crucifixa Bustos CAMERO; Kathy Dennis Salazar Bustos; Eber Jese Salazar Bustos, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76995.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*429Submitted May 16, 2007.*

Filed June 13, 2007.

' Maziar Razi, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Alison Marie Igoe, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Crucifixa Bustos Camero and her two children, Kathy Dennis Salazar Bustos and Eber Jese Salazar Bustos, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion to reopen proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, and review claims of due process violations due to ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. *See Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review.

We disagree with the IJ and BIA that petitioners failed to demonstrate that their representative’s failure to timely perfect their appeal resulted in prejudice. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (failure to file a timely appeal creates a rebuttable presumption of prejudice). Prior counsel’s untimely filing prejudiced Petitioners in that Petitioners lost the benefit of voluntary departure, and were barred from adjusting status for ten years. *See id.*at 827; *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d) (alien who fails to depart pursuant to voluntary departure order is ineligible for certain forms of relief, including *430adjustment of status, for a period of 10 years).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.40

                                 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Ronald A. Hirsch ("Hirsch") and Auramet Trading, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Auramet"), executed that Agreement for Credit Risk
Participation, dated October 17, 2005 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

Hirsch hereby acknowledges that, upon receipt of $_________, the Agreement shall
terminate. Hirsch also consents to the filing of a Deed of Release and
Reconveyance by Auramet, releasing the security interest evidenced by the Deed
of Trust, upon receipt of the funds referenced in the preceding sentence.

Date: November __, 2005                 Hirsch:


                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald. A. Hirsch
EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
September  30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  by
Millstream  Acquisition  Corporation (the "Company") on the date hereof,  Arthur
Spector,  the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and Lynda R. Guinan,  the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted:

1.      The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended
        September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"),  to which this Certification
        is attached as Exhibit  32,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
        Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
        as amended; and

2.      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition of the Company.



Dated: November 12, 2003

                                                  /s/ Arthur Spector
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                                  /s/ Lynda R. Guinan
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
### §18202. Establishment of Pregnancy Assistance Fund

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in collaboration and coordination with the Secretary of Education (as appropriate), shall establish a Pregnancy Assistance Fund to be administered by the Secretary, for the purpose of awarding competitive grants to States to assist pregnant and parenting teens and women.

#### (b) Use of Fund

A State may apply for a grant under subsection (a) to carry out any activities provided for in section 18203 of this title.

#### (c) Applications

To be eligible to receive a grant under subsection (a), a State shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, including a description of the purposes for which the grant is being requested and the designation of a State agency for receipt and administration of funding received under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10212, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 932.)
Date: October 21, 2014 

Subject: Correction to Zinc Pyrithione Registration Review Docket Number 

From: 

To: 

Sandra O'Neill, Chemical Review Manager 

Regulatory Management Branch II 

Antimicrobials Division 

Docket# EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0158 

EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of September 24, 2014, concerning the opening of 

public comment periods for several registration reviews. This document corrects an error made 

in the registration review docket number for Zinc Pyrithione (case 2480). The September 24, 

2014 FRN published the docket number as EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0147. The correct docket 

number for registration review is EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0158. Additionally, the zinc pyrithione 

registration review was previously included in the June 25, 2014 registration review FRN. 

However, this document supersedes the previous FRN announcement with regards to the zinc 

pyrithione registration review case. For further information, contact Sandra O'Neill, 

Antimicrobials Division MC: 7510-P, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 

34 7-0141; email address: oneill.sandra@epa.gov. 

Dated: -----+-=-/t-+-/J-_1-+- . /---'F-{:........___ 

Chemical Review Manager
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6002

LEROY BODIE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT SMITH,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00124-GCM)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LeRoy Bodie, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

LeRoy Bodie, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bodie has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED