alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2014-1052

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM140AD

747-53A2463, R1 --- 4/16/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### §1397i. Additional funding for aging and disability services programs

#### (a) Appropriation

In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated for fiscal year 2021, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $276,000,000, to remain available until expended, to carry out the programs described in division B of this subchapter.

#### (b) Use of funds

Of the amounts made available by subsection (a)—

(1) $88,000,000 shall be made available to carry out the programs described in division B of this subchapter in fiscal year 2021, of which not less than an amount equal to $100,0000,000 minus the amount previously provided in fiscal year 2021 to carry out section 1397m–1(b) of this title shall be made available to carry out such section; and

(2) $188,000,000 shall be made available to carry out the programs described in division B of this subchapter in fiscal year 2022, of which not less than $100,000,000 shall be for activities described in section 1397m–1(b) of this title.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2010, as added Pub. L. 117–2, title IX, §9301, Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 126.)
### §13311. Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are to promote—

(1) increases in the production and utilization of energy from renewable energy resources;

(2) further advances of renewable energy technologies; and

(3) exports of United States renewable energy technologies and services.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XII, §1201, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title" meaning title XII of Pub. L. 102–486, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2956, which enacted this subchapter and amended sections 6276, 12001 to 12003, 12005, and 12006 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 15, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 15, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to November 16, 2004, 12 p.m., One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington Circle, Washington, DC, 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 3, 2004, 69 FR 64078-64081.                

The meeting will be held December 9, 2004 to December 10, 2004. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: November 18, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-26251  Filed 11-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 201.410 Appeal of initial decisions by hearing officers. ( a ) *Petition for review; when available.* In any proceeding in which an initial decision is made by a hearing officer, any party, and any other person who would have been entitled to judicial review of the decision entered therein if the Commission itself had made the decision, may file a petition for review of the decision with the Commission.
( b ) *Procedure.* The petition for review of an initial decision shall be filed with the Commission within such time after service of the initial decision as prescribed by the hearing officer pursuant to § 201.360(b) unless a party has filed a motion to correct an initial decision with the hearing officer. If such correction has been sought, a party shall have 21 days from the date of the hearing officer's order resolving the motion to correct to file a petition for review. The petition shall set forth a statement of the issues presented for review under § 201.411(b). In the event a petition for review is filed, any other party to the proceeding may file a cross-petition for review within the original time allowed for seeking review or within ten days from the date that the petition for review was filed, whichever is later.
( c ) *Length limitation.* Except with leave of the Commission, the petition for review shall not exceed three pages in length. Incorporation of pleadings or filings by reference into the petition is not permitted. Motions to file petitions in excess of those limitations are disfavored.
( d ) *Financial disclosure statement requirement.* Any person who files a petition for review of an initial decision that asserts that person's inability to pay either disgorgement, interest or a penalty shall file with the opening brief a sworn financial disclosure statement containing the information specified in § 201.630(b).
( e ) *Prerequisite to judicial review.* Pursuant to Section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 704, a petition to the Commission for review of an initial decision is a prerequisite to the seeking of judicial review of a final order entered pursuant to such decision.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13179, Mar. 19, 2004; 81 FR 50240, July 29, 2016]
#### Essex-Stanton Corp., Appellant, v. Shear Lehrer, Respondent.

In this case findings should be made by the trial court as to the investment, purchase price, terms and arrangements in the original purchase of the property by Ludlow Corporation and subsequent acquisition by the landlord, as to the relationship between the two corporations, the equity of the landlord if the corporate entities are assimilated, and allocation of the purchase price, liens and *724equity to the property in issue. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 368 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and improve certain provisions relating to the removal of litigation against Federal officers or agencies to Federal 

courts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 368 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removal Clarification 

3 Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LITIGATION TO FEDERAL 

5 COURTS. 

6 (a) CLARIFICATION OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN

7 TYPES OF PROCEEDINGS.—Section 1442 of title 28, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

10 paragraph (1)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘that is’’ after ‘‘or crimi12 nal prosecution’’; 

13 (B) by inserting ‘‘and that is’’ after ‘‘in a 

14 State court’’; and 

15 (C) by inserting ‘‘or directed to’’ after 

16 ‘‘against’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(c) As used in subsection (a), the terms ‘civil action’ 

19 and ‘criminal prosecution’ include any proceeding (wheth20 er or not ancillary to another proceeding) to the extent 

21 that in such proceeding a judicial order, including a sub22 poena for testimony or documents, is sought or issued. If 

23 removal is sought for a proceeding described in the pre24 vious sentence, and there is no other basis for removal, 

25 only that proceeding may be removed to the district 

26 court.’’. 
3 

•HR 368 EH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1442(a) 

2 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— 

3 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘capacity for’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘capacity, for or relating to’’; and 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘sued’’; and 

7 (2) in each of paragraphs (3) and (4), by in8 serting ‘‘or relating to’’ after ‘‘for’’. 

9 (c) APPLICATION OF TIMING REQUIREMENT.—Sec10 tion 1446 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 

11 adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(g) Where the civil action or criminal prosecution 

13 that is removable under section 1442(a) is a proceeding 

14 in which a judicial order for testimony or documents is 

15 sought or issued or sought to be enforced, the 30-day re16 quirement of subsections (b) and (c) is satisfied if the per17 son or entity desiring to remove the proceeding files the 

18 notice of removal not later than 30 days after receiving, 

19 through service, notice of any such proceeding.’’. 
4 

•HR 368 EH

1 (d) REVIEWABILITY ON APPEAL.—Section 1447(d) of 

2 title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

3 ‘‘1442 or’’ before ‘‘1443’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 368 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify 

poses. agencies to Federal courts, and for other purmoval of litigation against Federal officers or and improve certain provisions relating to the re-
#### William C. Gibons, Defendant in Error, v. Williams, Monicer *&*Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,541.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Thbnbahgh, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 8, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by William C. G-ibons against Williams, Monicer & Company, a corporation, on a verbal contract for services rendered in negotiating a real estate transaction.

Defendant, while admitting that the services were rendered, denied that it had agreed to pay the amount claimed by plaintiff.

*595Abstract of the Decision.

1. Brokers, § *92*
      ***
      *—when finding of jury as to amount due for services rendered not disturbed.*Where in an action for services rendered in negotiating the sale of realty, the rendering of the services is not disputed, but only the amount agreed to be paid therefor, and there is evidence tending to corroborate plaintiff’s testinmny as to the amount, the verdict will not be disturbed.

2. Brokers, § *5*—when want of license not defense in action for services in negotiating real estate transaction.*Where an action is brought on a promise to pay for services rendered for negotiating a real estate transaction, the fact that plaintiff is not a licensed broker is no defense.

3. Appeal and error, § 1034*—the Appellate Court will not take judicial notice of city ordinances.

To reverse a judgment on the verdict of the jury for two hundred and fifty dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

Harry B. Miller, for plaintiff in error.

William C. Gibons its, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
No: II-16-026 April 27, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss 2015 Performance at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Tuesday, May 3, to 

discuss the agency’s 2015 assessment of both units at the Watts Bar nuclear plant site.

The plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located near Spring City, Tenn., 

about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville. Watts Bar Unit 1 has been in operation since 1996. The NRC 

issued an operating license for Unit 2 in October 2015 and it is expected to go into commercial 

operation soon.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 5-7 p.m. at the 

Comfort Inn, 2811 Decatur Pike in Athens, Tenn.

The NRC has resident inspectors at each unit and those inspectors as well as other staff 

members will be available to answer questions on the safety performance and regulatory oversight of 

both Watts Bar units, as well as highlights of NRC inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Watts Bar Unit 1

is being operated safely and Unit 2 meets all NRC testing and startup requirements,” said NRC Region 

II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These annual meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and 

especially people who live near the plant, to learn about our inspection and oversight programs.”

An NRC letter sent to plant officials addresses the performance of Unit 1 during 2015 and 

another letter discussed the NRC assessment of Unit 2. 

The NRC review of Watts Bar Unit 1 for 2015 concluded that it operated in a manner that 

preserved public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, the 

plant will continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power 

plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Watts Bar Unit 1 were green in 2015.

The NRC found that Watts Bar Unit 2 construction and testing activities met all NRC 

regulations during 2015, and the NRC inspection staff continues to monitor and evaluate performance 

during startup. 
Page | 2

In late March, the NRC issued a chilling effect letter to TVA after an NRC review found that 

some employees may not have felt free to raise safety concerns. Although that letter fell outside the 

2015 performance period, NRC staff members will be prepared to answer questions about that letter. 

Current performance information for Watts Bar Unit 1 is available on the NRC website. That 

information is updated at least quarterly. Additional information on the construction of Watts Bar Unit 

2 is also available on the website.
§ 1507.7 Handles and spikes. ( a ) Fireworks devices which are intended to be hand-held and are so labeled shall incorporate a handle at least 4 inches in length (see § 1500.14(b)(7)). Handles shall remain firmly attached during transportation, handling and full operation of the device, or shall consist of an integral section of the device at least four inches below the pyrotechnic chamber.
( b ) Spikes provided with fireworks devices shall protrude at least 2 inches from the base of the device and shall have a blunt tip not less than 1 ⁄ 8-inch in diameter of 1 ⁄ 8-inch square.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2476

JUDY CURRY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
WALTER W. WEIFORD, personally and in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; ROBERT A. ALKIRE, personally and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; DAVID A. WALTON, personally and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; COUNTY COMMISSION OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants - Appellees.

No. 04-2479

JUDY CURRY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
WALTER WEIFORD, personally and in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; ROBERT A. ALKIRE, personally and in his official capacity as- 2 - Sheriff of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; DAVID A. WALTON, personally and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Pocahontas County, West Virginia; COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-115-2)
Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judy Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Duane Joseph Ruggier, II, PULLIN, FOWLER & FLANAGAN, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Judy Curry seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motion for permissive joinder, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a), and for modification of a discovery order filed in her underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders Curry seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Curry’s pending motion to remand. We deny Curry’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §14408. Relation to other laws

The provisions of this chapter supersede other Federal laws (including laws enacted after April 30, 1997) except to the extent such laws specifically supersede the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 105–12, §10, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 29.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 105–12, Apr. 30, 1997, 111 Stat. 23, known as the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14401 of this title and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.68 Promptness.

Each member should promptly perform the duties with which he is charged by the statutes. The Commission should evaluate continuously its practices and procedures to assure that it promptly disposes of all matters affecting the rights of those regulated. This is particularly desirable in quasi-judicial proceedings. While avoiding arbitrary action in unreasonably or unjustly forcing matters to trial, members should endeavor to hold counsel to a proper appreciation of their duties to the public, their clients and others who are interested. Requests for continuances of matters should be determined in a manner consistent with this policy.
### §16161e. Laboratory management

#### (a) In general

The National Energy Technology Laboratory, the Idaho National Laboratory, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory shall continue to work in a crosscutting manner to carry out the programs established under sections 16161a and 16161c of this title.

#### (b) Coordination; clearinghouse

In carrying out subsection (a), the National Energy Technology Laboratory shall—

(1) coordinate with—

(A) the Idaho National Laboratory, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other National Laboratories in a cross-cutting manner;

(B) institutions of higher education;

(C) research institutes;

(D) industrial researchers; and

(E) international researchers; and

(2) act as a clearinghouse to collect information from, and distribute information to, the National Laboratories and other entities described in subparagraphs (B) through (E) of paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VIII, §817, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, §40314(2), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1014.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.