alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 16-063 November 14, 2016

Contact: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Begins Scoping Effort for Environmental Review of

Proposed WCS Interim Spent Fuel Storage Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comments from the public on the issues to be 

covered in the environmental review of an application from Waste Control Specialists to construct and 

operate a facility to store spent nuclear fuel in Andrews County, Texas. The NRC will prepare an 

environmental impact statement to document its evaluation of those impacts and is now taking public 

comments on the scope.

WCS filed its application in April seeking a 40-year license for a facility that would receive 

spent fuel from nuclear reactors for storage, pending final disposal. The NRC will be conducting two 

separate reviews – an environmental review to identify potential impacts, and a safety review to 

determine whether the WCS application meets the NRC’s regulatory requirements. The environmental 

review will fulfill the National Environmental Policy Act’s requirement to do an analysis of 

environmental impacts for major federal actions.

The agency has not yet accepted and docketed the WCS application. WCS has been providing 

supplemental information in phases in response to a June 22 NRC request. The NRC will evaluate the 

supplemental responses before deciding whether to docket the application and proceed with the safety 

review. If the NRC dockets the application, it will announce in the Federal Register an opportunity to 

ask for a public hearing and an end date for comments on the scope of the environmental review.

WCS had asked for the environmental review to begin as soon as possible. The NRC has agreed 

because doing so will allow the agency to engage interested members of the public early in the process. 

It will also provide additional time to consult with federal, tribal, state and local government agencies, 

facilitating compliance with the Endangered Species Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.

“We cannot proceed with the technical safety review until WCS adequately addresses our 

request for supplemental information, but we do have the information we need to begin the 

environmental scoping process now,” said NRC’s Mark Lombard, director of the division of spent fuel 

management. “WCS will bear the cost of staff time devoted to the environmental review, even if we are 

unable to docket the application in its current form.”

Written comments on the scope may be submitted over the federal government’s rulemaking 

website, www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2016-0231; by email to 

WCS_CISF_EIS@nrc.gov; or by mail to Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN12 H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. More information can be 

found in today’s Federal Register notice.
§ 323.5 Relation to Federal and State laws. ( a ) *In general.* This part shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting the application of any other federal law or regulation relating to country-of-origin labeling requirements, including but not limited to the Federal Meat Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.,* the Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.,* and the Egg Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. 1031 *et seq.* In addition, this part shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any other State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation relating to country-of-origin labeling requirements, except to the extent that such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is inconsistent with the provisions of this part, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.
( b ) *Greater protection under State law.* For purposes of this section, a State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this part if the protection such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided under this part, as determined by the Commission on its own motion or upon the petition of any interested party.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little SiouxCorn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the three month fiscal quarterended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daryl Haack, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Daryl Haack              |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Daryl Haack                              |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer    |
|   | Dated:  February 17, 2004 |

 

----
### §1396f. Observance of religious beliefs

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require any State which has a plan approved under this subchapter to compel any person to undergo any medical screening, examination, diagnosis, or treatment or to accept any other health care or services provided under such plan for any purpose (other than for the purpose of discovering and preventing the spread of infection or contagious disease or for the purpose of protecting environmental health), if such person objects (or, in case such person is a child, his parent or guardian objects) thereto on religious grounds.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XIX, §1907, as added Pub. L. 90–248, title II, §232, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 905.)
January 23, 2015 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the December 2014 monthly status 

report on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated 

carryover funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC 

activities in December 2014 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit in In re Aiken County, regarding the licensing process for the U.S. 

Department of Energy’s Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at (301) 415-1776 if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

 /RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

The Honorable Ed Whitfield 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
No: IV-16-022 October 31, 2016 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Begins Special Inspection at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Grand Gulf Nuclear 

Station to review circumstances surrounding several recent operational events. The plant, operated by 

Entergy Operations, Inc. and located in Port Gibson, Miss., has been shut down since Sept. 8.

“The purpose of this special inspection is to better understand the circumstances surrounding 

several recent operational events to determine if operator response was appropriate,” NRC Region IV 

Administrator Kriss Kennedy said. “We will also review the licensee’s corrective actions to ensure that 

their causes, including associated equipment problems and any contributing operator actions, have been 

effectively addressed.”

On Sept. 23, following maintenance on the residual heat removal system, workers discovered 

that a misalignment of valves had rendered the plant’s alternate decay heat removal system unavailable. 

Technical specifications require that the alternate system be available when one of the plant’s two 

residual heat removal systems is out of service. The system is used to remove decay heat from the 

reactor following shutdown. The following day, when preparing to restart the reactor, control room 

operators caused an unexpected increase in reactor vessel water level due to a misalignment of valves.

On Sept. 27, Entergy decided that the facility would remain shut down until they were satisfied 

with corrective actions to improve operations.

Three NRC inspectors will spend about a week on site evaluating the licensee’s root cause 

analysis and the adequacy of corrective actions to address performance issues. An inspection report 

documenting the team’s findings will be publicly available within 45 days of the end of the inspection.
#### Sinclair Refining Company, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 29418.)

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.
### §14612. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14612 was editorially reclassified as section 40312 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Public National Bank and Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant. Pak-It-Rite Paper Box Co., Respondent, v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant. (Consolidated Actions.)

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 584.]
NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS 

FOR SALEM AND HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that applications for a 20-year 

renewal of the operating licenses for Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2, and Hope 

Creek Generating Station are available for public review. 

 Both plants are located in Hancock Bridge, N.J., about 18 miles south of Wilmington, 

Del. The current operating licenses for Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2 expire on 

Aug. 13, 2016 and April 18, 2020; and the Hope Creek license expires on April 11, 2026. 

 

 The licensee, PSEG Nuclear LLC, submitted the renewal applications on August 18 for 

Salem and Hope Creek, respectively. The applications are available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html. 

 The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the applications to determine 

whether they contain enough information for the required formal review. If the applications have 

sufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the applications and will 

announce an opportunity to request a public hearing. 

 For further information, contact Donnie Ashley, project manager, in the Division of 

License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Mail Stop O11-F1, Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone (301) 415-3191 or email at 

Donnie.Ashley@nrc.gov. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-144 September 1, 2009
#### Anthony Valvo et al., Respondents, v Loyal Order of Moose 1614, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[821 NYS2d 524]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered August 22, 2005 in a personal injury action. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, adjudged that defendant is 70% at fault.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred *1281in denying that part of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and grant a new trial. We disagree. It was not “utterly irrational” for the jury to conclude that the presence of plaintiff Anthony Valvo on defendant’s premises was foreseeable *(Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]). Furthermore, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence inasmuch as it cannot be said that the evidence so preponderated in favor of defendant that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche and Pine, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Eureka  Financial  Corp,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  December  31, 2003 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Edward F. Seserko,  President and Chief Executive Officer,  and Gary
B. Pepper,  Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February  10, 2004



/s/Edward F. Seserko                          /s/Gary B. Pepper
-------------------------------------         ----------------------------
Edward F. Seserko                             Gary B. Pepper
President and Chief Executive Officer         Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer




         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CASH WRIGHT AND JASMINE WRIGHT,

Petitioners

v.

STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,
ET AL,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 108 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2




                               PROXIM CORPORATION

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      As of the date hereof, I, David L. Thompson, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Proxim Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit accompanying such Report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                            /s/ DAVID L. THOMPSON
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                              David L. Thompson
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: March 12, 2004
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title IV of the Public Health Service Act, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, 58 Stat. 707, at which time title IV related solely to the National Cancer Institute. Because of the extensive amendments, reorganization of the subject matter, and expansion of title IV by the acts listed below, title IV is shown herein as having been added by Pub. L. 99–158, without reference to intervening amendments.

The provisions of title IV as originally enacted were subsequently redesignated as part A of title IV and amended, and parts B to I of title IV were added and amended by the following acts: June 16, 1948, ch. 481, 62 Stat. 464; June 24, 1948, ch. 621, 62 Stat. 598; Aug. 15, 1950, ch. 714, 64 Stat. 443; Oct. 5, 1961, Pub. L. 87–395, 75 Stat. 824; Oct. 17, 1962, Pub. L. 87–838, 76 Stat. 1072; Aug. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–489, 82 Stat. 771; Oct. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–515, 84 Stat. 1297; Dec. 23, 1971, Pub. L. 92–218, 85 Stat. 778; May 19, 1972, Pub. L. 92–305, 86 Stat. 162; Sept. 19, 1972, Pub. L. 92–423, 86 Stat. 679; Apr. 22, 1974, Pub. L. 93–270, 88 Stat. 90; May 14, 1974, Pub. L. 93–282, 88 Stat. 126; May 31, 1974, Pub. L. 93–296, 88 Stat. 184; July 12, 1974, Pub. L. 93–348, 88 Stat. 342; July 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–352, 88 Stat. 358; July 23, 1974, Pub. L. 93–354, 88 Stat. 373; Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–640, 88 Stat. 2217; July 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–63, 89 Stat. 304; Nov. 28, 1975, Pub. L. 94–135, 89 Stat. 713; Apr. 21, 1976, Pub. L. 94–273, 90 Stat. 375; Apr. 22, 1976, Pub. L. 94–278, 90 Stat. 401; Oct. 19, 1976, Pub. L. 94–562, 90 Stat. 2645; Aug. 1, 1977, Pub. L. 95–83, 91 Stat. 383; Nov. 9, 1978, Pub. L. 95–622, 92 Stat. 3412; Nov. 9, 1978, Pub. L. 95–623, 92 Stat. 3443; July 10, 1979, Pub. L. 96–32, 93 Stat. 82; Oct. 7, 1980, Pub. L. 96–398, 94 Stat. 1564; Dec. 17, 1980, Pub. L. 96–538, 94 Stat. 3183; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, 95 Stat. 358; Apr. 26, 1984, Pub. L. 98–24, 97 Stat. 175.

Title IV was subsequently amended generally and completely reorganized by Pub. L. 99–158, §2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 822.
- Skip to page content

        - Aircraft Inquiries
        -  
        - N-number
        - Serial Number
        - Name
        - Make / Model
        - Engine Reference
        - Dealer
        - Document Index
        - State and County
        - Territory and Country
        - Pending / Expired / Canceled Registration Reports
        - Recent Registration
        - N-number Availability
        -  
        - Request A Reserved N-Number
            - Online
            - In Writing
        -  
        - Reserved N-Number Renewal
            - Online
        -  
        - Request for Aircraft Records
            - Online
        -  
        - Help
          - Main Menu
          - Aircraft Registration
          - Aircraft Downloadable Database
          - Definitions
          - N-Number Format
          - Registrations at Risk
          - Contact Aircraft Registration

FAA Home»Licenses & Certificates»Aircraft Certification»Aircraft Registration»Aircraft Inquiry»N-Number Inquiry

----

----
### §13774. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13774 was editorially reclassified as section 12144 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Graeme  Scott,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/    Graeme Scott
Graeme Scott
President, C.E.O., and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


May 6, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bidgive International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 13, 2010 /s/ Rebecca Richardson-Blanchard Chief Financial Officer