alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4917] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “André Kertész,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC from on or about January 30, 2005 to on or about May 1, 2005, the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA from on or about June 7, 2005, to on or about August 28, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit object, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

      ( print page 70747)    
Dated: December 1, 2004. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 04-26822 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3333

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Martin Gonzalez Valdez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 16, 2004

Filed: June 21, 2004

___________

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Martin Gonzalez Valdez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute over 500

grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court1

 sentenced him to 135 months

imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to

withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
-2-

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

I, Charles Sander, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Catcher Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |  |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Sander                    
|                      |  |  |  | Charles Sander Chief Executive
Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 13, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00584

- CV

IN RE EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On August 13, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency

relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires

further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than August 27, 2014. Any

such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s request for tempora ry emergency relief is GRANTED. Any enforcement of the trial

court’s August 4, 2014 First Amended Order Granting Traditional and No

- Evidence Motion for Summary

Judgment of Grace River Ranch, LLC is TEMPORARILY STAYED until further order of this court.

I t is so ORDERED on August 13 th , 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13

- 04

- 00108

- CVL, styled Grace River Ranch, LLC v. El Caballero

Ranch, Inc. a/k/a El Caballero, LLC and Laredo Marine, LLC v. Robert W. Brittingham , pending in the 218th

Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.
#### H. & I. Feldman Contracting Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Louis Waller and Others, Appellants.

Order modified as stated in order, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scótt, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
| **INVENTORIES, NET (Narrative) (Details)** | Jun. 30, 2022 | Jun. 30, 2021 |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]**        |          |          |
| Percentage of LIFO inventory               | 36.00%        | 34.00%        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_InventoryDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The percentage of LIFO (last in first out) inventory to total inventory as of the balance sheet date if other than 100 percent.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_PercentageOfLIFOInventory**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**dtr-types:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
### §16983. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16983 was editorially reclassified as section 20983 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### ISAAC CARTMELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Defendant-Appellee.

Fourth District

No. 13249

Opinion filed June 24, 1976.

Stephen O. Willoughby, of Legal Aid Society, of Decatur, for appellant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General, of Chicago (Stephen R. Swofford, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE SIMKINS

delivered the opinion of the court:

As the result of an administrative hearing on August 28, 1974, plaintiff CartmelTs aid to the aged grant, under which he had been receiving payment for his homemaker personal care needs, was terminated. The Department of Public Aid notified him of the determination by a letter of September 19, 1974. He filed a complaint for administrative review on *686October 30, 1974. The court dismissed the complaint because it had not been filed within the 35-day statutory period. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 267.) Plaintiff now argues that the statute violates his right to due process and equal protection by discriminating against him because of his poverty and ill health. He is in his eighties and confined to bed or a wheelchair because of acute muscular arthritis. His only regular source of income is *189 per month in social security although his application to sue as a poor person also states that he is employed as a watchmaker.

 Alleged discrimination based on wealth is governed by the constitutional standard of rational justification. *(Ortwein v. Schwab,*410 U.S. 656, 35 L. Ed. 2d 572, 93 S. Ct. 1172.) The State argues that the statute in question is designed to promote an orderly, efficient, and speedy system of justice. This is sufficient justification to withstand the constitutional charge based on wealth discrimination.

 Plaintiff cites no cases, nor have we found any, bearing on the constitutional ramifications of the health discrimination he alleges. He does cite two cases from other jurisdictions in which the trial court has the discretion to toll the statute of limitations because of illness. In this State, however, the statute is clearly jurisdictional and the trial court has no such discretion. *(Johnson v. State Police Merit Board,*99 Ill. App. 2d 458, 241 N.E.2d 468.) Plaintiff asks us to declare the statute unconstitutional precisely because it affords no discretion. We conclude, however, that because no suspect classification such as race, nationality, or alienage is present *(Ortwein),*the rational justification standard must again be applicable. As we stated above, the statute meets that standard. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to show how his health interfered with his ability to obtain counsel soon enough to meet the 35-day deadline. His allegations on this issue are insufficient to even raise the constitutional issue. *People v. Palkes,*52 Ill. 2d 472, 288 N.E.2d 469.

Affirmed.

TRAPP, P. J., and GREEN, J., concur.
#### § 315.9 Enforcement.

Any violation of this Rule shall be treated as a violation of a rule under section 18 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 57a, regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and the Commission will enforce this Rule in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as are available to it pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 41 *et seq.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgewater Foods International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Boswell, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:  January 16, 2007



/s/  Michael Boswell

Michael Boswell,

Acting Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles Sander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                         |  |  |  |                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Date: September 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Sander        
|                         |  |  |  | Charles Sander            
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of
|                         |  |  |  | Catcher Holdings, Inc.    

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### In the Matter of Sterling-Nash Corp., Appellant, against Charles U. Combes, as City Clerk of the City of New Rochelle, Respondent.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, petitioner appeals from an order denying its application for an order requiring and directing the city clerk of the city of New Rochelle to insert and include in petitioner’s license to sell used cars (heretofore granted for premises located at 160 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle), the privilege to sell used cars at the premises located at 427 Main Street, New Rochelle, on the ground that the latter premises are an “improved” lot and, therefore, not subject to the provisions of subdivision (g) of section 2 of article VIII of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Rochelle, which relates to “ unimproved ” lots. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. It is clear from the history of the enactment of subdivision (g) that the intention of the city council was to control the “used ear lots” business. The inclusion of the word “unimproved” in said subdivision (g) was intended to distinguish a *vacant lot*from a lot with. a building or a structure thereon. It was not contemplated that the leveling and paving of the lot, and the erection of retaining walls, would take the lot out of the “unimproved” category and out of the jurisdiction of the board of appeals on zoning. Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Beldock, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., concurs in result.
No. IV-12-004

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 200-1519

January 18, 2012 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected 

Chris Henderson as the new resident inspector at the Cooper 

Nuclear plant located 23 miles south of Nebraska City, Neb. 

 “Chris Henderson’s background and experience will 

assist the NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people 

and the environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear 

power plants,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. 

Collins.

Henderson joined the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in February 2010 as a Reactor 

Operations Engineer in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. He worked in the Division of 

Inspection Regional Support where he qualified as Reactor Oversight Process Engineer. In June, 

Henderson was selected to be a participant in the Resident Inspector Development Program in 

Region IV where he worked as a Project Engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Henderson served in the U.S. Navy aboard the Los Angeles 

class attack submarine USS Annapolis, based in Groton, Conn., and at Commander Submarine 

Group Seven in Yokosuka, Japan. Henderson holds both a master’s degree in Nuclear 

Engineering and a bachelor’s degree in Nuclear Engineering from Kansas State University. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

Henderson joins senior resident inspector Jeff Josey. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at 

the facility, conducting inspections and monitoring significant work projects.

The Cooper resident inspectors can be reached at: (402) 825-3371.

###

News releases are available through a free Listserv subscription or by clicking on the EMAIL UPDATES link on the 

NRC homepage (www.nrc.gov). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

website. For the latest news, follow the NRC on www.twitter.com/NRCgov.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.

 Arlington, TX 76011-4511

Telephone: (817) 860-8100

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
#### William D. Stiger, Appellant, v. Village of Hewlett Bay Park et al., Respondents.

*768In our opinion, this is not an action at law “ for a nuisance ” within the meaning of section 425 of the Civil Practice Act but is an action in equity for an injunction. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### §§1561 to 1563. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1561, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title IV, §401, as added Apr. 10, 1942, ch. 239, §4, 56 Stat. 212; amended Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73, which authorized appropriations for housing of United States employees, was omitted pursuant to act July 3, 1952, ch. 570, §1(a)(12), 66 Stat. 332, as amended by act Mar. 31, 1953, ch. 13, §1, 67 Stat. 18, which provided that this section and section 1562 of this title continue in force until six months after the termination of the national emergency proclaimed by the President on Dec. 16, 1950 by Proc. No. 2914, 15 F.R. 9029, 64 Stat. A 454, set out as a note preceding section 1 of Title 50, War and National Defense, or on such earlier date or dates as provided by Congress, but in no event beyond July 1, 1953.

Section 1562, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title IV, §402, as added Apr. 10, 1942, ch. 239, §4, 56 Stat. 213; amended June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103, 63 Stat. 380, authorized appropriations for public works projects. See par. set out above.

Section 1563, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title IV, §403, as added Apr. 10, 1942, ch. 239, §4, 56 Stat. 213; amended June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §103, 63 Stat. 380, which related to advancements to District of Columbia Commissioner for public works and reports to Congress, was omitted in view of the omission of sections 1561 and 1562 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Henry De Brito et al., Respondents, against Charles G. Coster et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, Respondents, and Roger Smith Hotels Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. = Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Peck, P. J., and Van Voorhis, J., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the petition upon the ground that the proceeding was not timely brought. [See *post,*p. 1026.]