alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-16-019 April 7, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Agency’s 2015 

Assessment of North Anna Nuclear Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Thursday, April 14,

to discuss the agency’s assessment of the North Anna nuclear plant’s two units during 2015. 

The plant, which is operated by Dominion, is located near Mineral, 40 miles northwest of 

Richmond.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 5 - 6 p.m. in the 

Louisa County Library, 881 Davis Highway, Mineral, Va.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the 

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the North Anna plant, as well as highlights of NRC 

inspections.

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure North Anna and 

other nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These 

annual meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to 

learn about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing the 2015 North Anna plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review concluded that North Anna Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved 

public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, the plant will 

continue to receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants 

receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for North Anna were green in 2015. 

Current performance information for both North Anna Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight, is available on the NRC website. Plant performance 

indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
No: 15-067 October 22, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Operating License for Watts Bar Unit 2,

Oversight Continues

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) a 40-

year operating license for Watts Bar Unit 2. This is the first U.S. reactor the NRC has authorized to 

operate since 1996, when the agency issued the license for Watts Bar Unit 1.

The Watts Bar plant, located in Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville, now 

has two pressurized-water reactors. The Unit 2 license allows operation through Oct. 22, 2055.

“After devoting more than 200,000 hours over eight years conducting extensive safety reviews 

and inspections, we’re satisfied Unit 2 is safe to operate and we’ve issued TVA the operating license,” 

said Bill Dean, director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “We already monitor Unit 

1’s performance through our Reactor Oversight Process, which is used at all reactor sites throughout 

the country, and we’re adding Unit 2 to that system. Staff from our Region II office in Atlanta will 

ensure TVA meets its requirements as it loads fuel into Unit 2 and runs tests before the unit starts 

generating electricity.”

TVA had maintained Unit 2 in an incomplete state since 1985 and had extended the unit’s 

construction permit since then. In 2007, the utility began efforts to complete Unit 2 and updated its 

operating license application in March 2009. The NRC staff completed its Unit 2 environmental review

in May 2013 and the staff has been supplementing the Unit 2 safety evaluation report on an ongoing 

basis. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards also reviewed the staff’s work and 

supported the licensing decision. 

Watts Bar is the first site to comply with the agency’s Fukushima-related Orders on

Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation. The agency has two Resident Inspectors at 

Watts Bar for day-to-day oversight of site activities, and an additional Resident Inspector for continued 

oversight of start-up activities at Unit 2.

The Watts Bar 2 decision means there are now 100 U.S. commercial reactors licensed to 

operate. Information on these plants and the NRC’s oversight of them is available on the NRC website.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007       /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr. Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer
### subpart 2—john e. fogarty international center for advanced study in health sciences
### §1437z–9. Data exchange standards for improved interoperability

#### (a) Designation

The Secretary shall, in consultation with an interagency work group established by the Office of Management and Budget, and considering State government perspectives, designate data exchange standards to govern, under this chapter—

(1) necessary categories of information that State agencies operating related programs are required under applicable law to electronically exchange with another State agency; and

(2) Federal reporting and data exchange required under applicable law.

#### (b) Requirements

The data exchange standards required by subsection (a) shall, to the maximum extent practicable—

(1) incorporate a widely accepted, nonproprietary, searchable, computer-readable format, such as the eXtensible Markup Language;

(2) contain interoperable standards developed and maintained by intergovernmental partnerships, such as the National Information Exchange Model;

(3) incorporate interoperable standards developed and maintained by Federal entities with authority over contracting and financial assistance;

(4) be consistent with and implement applicable accounting principles;

(5) be implemented in a manner that is cost-effective and improves program efficiency and effectiveness; and

(6) be capable of being continually upgraded as necessary.

#### (c) Rules of construction

Nothing in this section requires a change to existing data exchange standards for Federal reporting found to be effective and efficient.

(Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, title I, §37, as added Pub. L. 114–201, title V, §503(a), July 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 811.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 114–201, title V, §503(b), July 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 812, provided that:

"(1) In general.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 29, 2016], the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall issue a proposed rule to carry out the amendments made by subsection (a) [enacting this section].

"(2) Requirements.—The rule shall—

"(A) identify federally required data exchanges;

"(B) include specification and timing of exchanges to be standardized;

"(C) address the factors used in determining whether and when to standardize data exchanges;

"(D) specify State implementation options; and

"(E) describe future milestones."
§ 303.39 Maintenance of records. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of section 6 of the Act, every manufacturer of a textile fiber product subject to the Act, irrespective of whether any guaranty has been given or received, shall maintain records showing the information required by the Act and Regulations with respect to all such textile fiber products made by such manufacturer. Such records shall show: ( 1 ) The generic names and percentages by weight of the constituent fibers present in the textile fiber product, exclusive of permissive ornamentation, in amounts of five per centum or more.
( 2 ) The name, provided for in § 303.19, or registered identification number issued by the Commission, of the manufacturer or of one or more persons marketing or handling the textile fiber product.
( 3 ) The name of the country where such product was processed or manufactured as provided for in § 303.33. The purpose of the records is to permit a determination that the requirements of the Act and Regulations have been met and to establish a traceable line of continuity from raw material through processing to finished product.
( b ) Any person substituting a stamp, tag, label, or other identification pursuant to section 5(b) of the Act shall keep such records as will show the information set forth on the stamp, tag, label, or other identification that he removed and the name or names of the person or persons from whom such textile fiber product was received.
( c ) The records required to be maintained pursuant to the provisions of this rule shall be preserved for at least three years.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 53 FR 31315, Aug. 18, 1988]
May 31, 2016

Title: Pre-Application Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding Revising the Licensing Basis for

Alkali-Silica Reaction at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1

Date(s) and Time(s): June 15, 2016, 02:00 PM to 04:00 PM

Location: NRC Three White Flint North, 1C03

11601 Landsdown Street

Rockville, MD

Category: This is a Category 1 meeting. The public is invited to observe this meeting and will have

one or more opportunities to communicate with the NRC after the business portion of the

meeting but before the meeting is adjourned.

Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is for NextEra Energy to present to the NRC staff its plan for a

license amendment request regarding revising the licensing basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction

at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1.

Contact: Justin Poole

301-415-2048

Justin.Poole@nrc.gov

Rick Ennis

301-415-1420

Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov

NRC

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Participants: External

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

Docket No: 05000443
PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

Pre-Application Meeting with NextEra Energy Regarding Revising the Licensing Basis for Alkali-Silica Reaction at the

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1

June 15, 2016, 02:00 PM to 04:00 PM

NRC Three White Flint North, 1C03

11601 Landsdown Street

Rockville, MD
The time of the meeting is local to the jurisdiction where the meeting is being held.

The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If reasonable

accommodation is needed to participate in this meeting, or if a meeting notice, transcript, or other information

from this meeting is needed in another format (e.g., Braille, large print), please notify the NRC meeting contact.

Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.

ADAMS Accession Number: ML16153A279

Distribution:

Name JPoole LRonewicz DBroaddus

Office NRR/DORL/LPL1-2/PM NRR/DORL/LPL1-2/LA NRR/DORL/LPL1-2/BC

Date 05/31/2016 05/31/2016 05/31/2016

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Link to meeting details: http://meetings.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg?do=details&Code=20160775

Commission's Policy Statement on "Enhancing Public Participation in NRC Meetings"

67 Federal Register 36920, May 28, 2002

The policy statement may be found on the NRC website

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/policy/67fr36920.html
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3930 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Reactive 

Black 5. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLACK 5. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2014’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IRofPMNSubstance1
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 

2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00535-CV

J. STEVE PURSLEY, Appellant

V.

SHAUN MOONEY AND RECRUITMENT PARTNERS, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-28294

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 21, 2022. On March 15, 

2023, appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
No: II-14-017 April 7, 2014

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

NRC Schedules Open House April 16 to Discuss Agency’s 

Assessment of Hatch Nuclear Power Plant 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 16 to discuss 

the agency’s 2013 annual assessment of the Hatch nuclear power plant with the public. The plant, 

operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Baxley, Ga., about 20 miles south of 

Vidalia.

The open house is scheduled to run from 1-3 p.m. at the Southeastern Technical College, 

Conference Room 171, 3001 East First St., in Vidalia.

NRC staff members will be available to answer questions on the performance of the Hatch

plant, as well as the overall NRC role in ensuring safe plant operations.

“Our resident and region-based inspectors spend many hours monitoring plant activities to 

ensure that the plant operates safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree. “We hold 

these meetings every year to make our staff available to people who live close to the plant and answer 

questions about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of both 

Hatch units during 2013. 

During 2013, the NRC found that both Hatch units operated in a manner that preserved public 

health and safety and met all NRC objectives. The plant will receive the NRC’s normal detailed 

inspections in 2014.

In addition to those inspections, the NRC staff also plans to review the plant’s efforts related to 

an industry-wide initiative to control degradation of underground piping. 

Inspections are carried out by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialized inspectors from the Region II office in Atlanta. 

Current performance information for Hatch Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available on the NRC website.
#### Arthur Arzt, Appellant, v. Samuel Vorob, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Leroy Jones, Petitioner, v John Burge, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[818 NYS2d 923]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of contraband and possession of drugs. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Carroll v Goord,*24 AD3d 845 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
5315.606  Agency Procedures       See MP5315.606-90 for points of contact and procedures for controlling the receipt, handling, evaluation, and timely disposition of unsolicited proposals.     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5315.6 — UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
Subpart 5316.1 - SELECTING CONTRACT TYPES           **Parent topic:** Part 5316 - Types of Contracts5316.103  Negotiating Contract Type       (d) See the tailorable Determination and Findings template.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**I, Rodney B. Mott, certify that:**
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of International SteelGroup Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. [Intentionally left blank.];
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
   c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 10, 2005 /s/ Rodney B. Mott   Rodney B. Mott Chief Executive Officer
#### § 14.6 Disbarment or suspension by licensing authority.

Any attorney who has been suspended or disbarred by a Court of the United States or any state or territory or the District of Columbia and any person whose license to practice as an accountant has been revoked or suspended in any state or territory or the District of Columbia may not appear or practice before the Commission during the period when such suspension or revocation is in effect. A suspension or revocation shall be deemed to have occurred when the disbarring, suspending or revoking agency or tribunal enters its order, regardless of whether appeal is pending or could be taken, and includes a judgment or order on a plea of nolo contendere or the procedural equivalent of such a plea. For purposes of this section it shall be irrelevant that any attorney or accountant who has been suspended, disbarred, or otherwise disqualified from practice before a court or in a jurisdiction continues in professional good standing before other courts or in other jurisdictions.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 14, 2006