alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 08-0977

((((((((((((((((

In Re  Ruben S. Martin III, Relator

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.This case is **ABATED**, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b), for thirty days to allow the successor judge to reconsider the court's order issued September 19, 2008.   

2.     The case shall be abated, and removed from the Court’s active docket, for thirty days, or until further order of the Court.

3.     The parties are directed to notify this Court immediately of any change in status of the case, to notify this Court immediately when the successor judge has ruled, and to file a status report or other appropriate motion by March 9, 2009.

Done at the City of Austin, this 6th day of February, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 229.1206 (Item 1206) Present activities. ( a ) Disclose, by geographical area, the registrant's present activities, such as the number of wells in the process of being drilled (including wells temporarily suspended), waterfloods in process of being installed, pressure maintenance operations, and any other related activities of material importance.
( b ) Provide the description of present activities as of a date at the end of the most recent fiscal year or as close to the date that the registrant files the document as reasonably possible.
( c ) Include only those wells in the process of being drilled at the “as of” date and express them in terms of both gross and net wells.
( d ) Do not include wells that the registrant plans to drill, but has not commenced drilling unless there are factors that make such information material.
§ 260.9 Free-of claims. ( a ) It is deceptive to misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a product, package, or service is free of, or does not contain or use, a substance. Such claims should be clearly and prominently qualified to the extent necessary to avoid deception.
( b ) A truthful claim that a product, package, or service is free of, or does not contain or use, a substance may nevertheless be deceptive if: ( 1 ) The product, package, or service contains or uses substances that pose the same or similar environmental risks as the substance that is not present; or
( 2 ) The substance has not been associated with the product category.
( c ) Depending on the context, a free-of or does-not-contain claim is appropriate even for a product, package, or service that contains or uses a trace amount of a substance if: ( 1 ) The level of the specified substance is no more than that which would be found as an acknowledged trace contaminant or background level[47] ;
( 2 ) The substance's presence does not cause material harm that consumers typically associate with that substance; and
( 3 ) The substance has not been added intentionally to the product.
Example 1: A package of t-shirts is labeled “Shirts made with a chlorine-free bleaching process.” The shirts, however, are bleached with a process that releases a reduced, but still significant, amount of the same harmful byproducts associated with chlorine bleaching. The claim overstates the product's benefits because reasonable consumers likely would interpret it to mean that the product's manufacture does not cause any of the environmental risks posed by chlorine bleaching. A substantiated claim, however, that the shirts were “bleached with a process that releases 50% less of the harmful byproducts associated with chlorine bleaching” would not be deceptive.
Example 2: A manufacturer advertises its insulation as “formaldehyde free.” Although the manufacturer does not use formaldehyde as a binding agent to produce the insulation, tests show that the insulation still emits trace amounts of formaldehyde. The seller has substantiation that formaldehyde is present in trace amounts in virtually all indoor and (to a lesser extent) outdoor environments and that its insulation emits less formaldehyde than is typically present in outdoor environments. Further, the seller has substantiation that the trace amounts of formaldehyde emitted by the insulation do not cause material harm that consumers typically associate with formaldehyde. In this context, the trace levels of formaldehyde emissions likely are inconsequential to consumers. Therefore, the seller's free-of claim would not be deceptive.
Footnotes -
260.9
[47] “Trace contaminant” and “background level” are imprecise terms, although allowable manufacturing “trace contaminants” may be defined according to the product area concerned. What constitutes a trace amount or background level depends on the substance at issue, and requires a case-by-case analysis.
----

----

**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006,                as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date                hereof                (the “Report”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section                13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Michael V. Shustek                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael                V. Shustek                                                 |
| Chief                Executive Officer and Director of the Manager*               |
| of                Vestin Mortgage, Inc., Manager of the                Registrant |

| /s/John                Alderfer                                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John                Alderfer                                                      |
| Chief                Financial Officer of the Manager*                            |
| of                Vestin Mortgage, Inc., Manager of the                Registrant |
#### In the Matter of Jaime S., an Infant. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Appellant; Enedina E., Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 704]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joan S. Kohout, J), entered October 12, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, denied petitioner’s motions seeking a finding pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b (a) that *1199reasonable efforts to return the child to respondent are no longer required.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Inasmuch as respondent has surrendered the child who is the subject of this proceeding to petitioner, the appeal by petitioner from the order denying its motions pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b (a) is now moot. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche and Green, JJ.
#### § 322.1 Cross-reference.

The rules formerly at 16 CFR part 322 have been republished by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at 12 CFR part 1015, “Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (Regulation O).”
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, David
      McCourt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d);
      and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: July
              13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ David
              McCourtDavid
              McCourtChief
                Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ASB Holding Company ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 (the  "Report") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, we Joseph Kliminski,
President and Chief Executive Officer,  and Eric Heyer, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of
     operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods  presented in
the financial statements included in such report.




Dated:  August 13, 2004        /s/Joseph Kliminski
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Joseph Kliminski
                               President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 13, 2004        /s/Eric B. Heyer
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Eric B. Heyer
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No: 16-055 September 16, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Final Environmental Review on License Renewal for 

Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its final review detailing the environmental 

impacts of renewing the operating license of the Fermi 2 nuclear power plant in Michigan. The 

supplemental environmental impact statement contains the NRC staff’s conclusion that the impacts 

would not preclude renewing the plant’s license for an additional 20 years.

Fermi 2 is a boiling-water reactor located in Newport, Mich., about 25 miles northeast of 

Toledo, Ohio. It is currently licensed to operate through March 20, 2025. The operator, 

DTE Electric Co., submitted the renewal application April 30, 2014.

The report is Supplement 56 to NUREG-1437, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for 

License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It is now available on the NRC website. The NRC published a draft 

version of the report in November 2015 for public comment. The final report includes the staff’s 

responses to the comments.

The Fermi 2 license renewal application and general information about reactor license renewal

are available on the NRC website.
Part 529 - Taxes       Subpart 529.1 - General                                                         529.101 Policy.                                                                             Subpart 529.3 - State and Local Taxes                                                         529.302 Application of State and local taxes to the Government.                                                                             Subpart 529.4 - Contract Clauses                                                         529.470 Domestic contract clauses.    **Parent topic:** General Services Administration Acquisition ManualSubpart 529.1 - General 	  529.101 Policy. 		    Action may not be taken on any matters involving taxes on Federal purchases or contracts without obtaining legal review. See ADM 5000.4A for the requirement to obtain legal review by the Office of General Counsel (OGC) for agency actions. See FAR 29.101 (b) through (d) for the type of tax-related issues that require legal review.Subpart 529.3 - State and Local Taxes 	  529.302 Application of State and local taxes to the Government. 		    If it has been determined that evidence of tax exemption is required, contracting officers shall follow the guidance as outlined on GSA Insite. Contracting officers shall input “Tax Exemption Information” in the search tool and then select “Tax Exemption Information” from the results list for point of contact information and GSA’s tax exemption number.Subpart 529.4 - Contract Clauses 	  529.470 Domestic contract clauses. 		    (a)Insert the clause at 552.229-70, Federal, State, and Local Taxes, in solicitations and contracts estimated to exceed the micro-purchase threshold, but not the simplified acquisition threshold. 				         				         					          (b)Insert the clause at 552.229-71, Federal Excise Tax—DC Government, in solicitations and contracts that allow the District of Columbia Government to place orders under the contract.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL W. PALKOVIC                                              
|Michael W. Palkovic Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May
5, 2004
### §15872. Assessment of geothermal energy potential

Not later than 3 years after August 8, 2005, and thereafter as the availability of data and developments in technology warrants, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Geological Survey and in cooperation with the States, shall—

(1) update the Assessment of Geothermal Resources made during 1978; and

(2) submit to Congress the updated assessment.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §226, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 665.)
### §15824. State Technologies Advancement Collaborative

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, in cooperation with the States, shall establish a cooperative program for research, development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies in which there is a common Federal and State energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fossil energy interest, to be known as the "State Technologies Advancement Collaborative" (referred to in this section as the "Collaborative").

#### (b) Duties

The Collaborative shall—

(1) leverage Federal and State funding through cost-shared activity;

(2) reduce redundancies in Federal and State funding; and

(3) create multistate projects to be awarded through a competitive process.

#### (c) Administration

The Collaborative shall be administered through an agreement between the Department and appropriate State-based organizations.

#### (d) Funding sources

Funding for the Collaborative may be provided from—

(1) amounts specifically appropriated for the Collaborative; or

(2) amounts that may be allocated from other appropriations without changing the purpose for which the amounts are appropriated.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title I, §127, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 619.)
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick T. Doyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/PATRICK T. DOYLEPatrick T. Doyle Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerMay 7, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---



QuickLinks
§ 303.2 General requirements. ( a ) Each textile fiber product, except those exempted or excluded under section 12 of the Act, shall be labeled or invoiced in conformity with the requirements of the Act and regulations.
( b ) Any advertising of textile fiber products subject to the Act shall be in conformity with the requirements of the Act and regulations.
( c ) The requirements of the Act and regulations shall not be applicable to products required to be labeled under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 (Pub. L. 76-850, 15 U.S.C. 68, 54 Stat. 1128).
( d ) Any person marketing or handling textile fiber products who shall cause or direct a processor or finisher to label, invoice, or otherwise identify any textile fiber product with required information shall be responsible under the Act and regulations for any failure of compliance with the Act and regulations by reason of any statement or omission in such label, invoice, or other means of identification utilized in accordance with his direction: *Provided,* That nothing herein shall relieve the processor or finisher of any duty or liability to which he may be subject under the Act and regulations.
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

8-15-1997 

# I n Re: D ors ain

vi l

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 96-8074

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" I n Re: D or s ain

v i l " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s . P ape r 193. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/193

### iled August 15, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 96-8074
IN RE: OCSULIS DORSAINVIL,
Petitioner On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge , STAPLETON and COWEN, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION

### IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case ,

filed July 23, 1997, be amended by the addition of the following footnote referenced by an asterisk after the word "court." on page 2, line 8 from the bottom: *. The court expresses its appreciation to counsel for the petitioner for serving as volunteers at the req uest of the court to brief and argue this matter, which is in the highest tradition of service by members of the profession. By the Court /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge Dated: August 15, 1997
§ 998.43 Requirements. ( a ) No person within the Department of Commerce may restrict a NOAA Corps officer from making a lawful communication to a Member of Congress or an Inspector General.
( b ) A NOAA Corps officer shall be free from reprisal for making or preparing or being perceived as making or preparing a protected communication.
( c ) Any NOAA Corps officer or employee of the Department of Commerce who has the authority to take, direct others to take, or recommend or approve any personnel action shall not, under such authority, take or threaten to take a personnel action, or withhold or threaten to withhold a personnel action, as reprisal against any NOAA Corps officer for making or preparing or being perceived as making or preparing a protected communication.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1756

BRUCE ANTHONY DILLARD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Federal Bureau of 

Prisons,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief

District Judge. (3:16-cv-00009-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: November 18, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DUNCAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Anthony Dillard, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Carter Tison, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Anthony Dillard appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge dismissing 

Dillard’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dillard v. 

United States, No. 3:16-cv-00009-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 22, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED