alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1453a. Administrative priority for applications relating to activities in areas affected by base closings

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in processing applications for assistance under section 103 of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1453], section 111 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 [42 U.S.C. 3311], section 708(a)(1) and (2) of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 [42 U.S.C. 3108(a)(1), (2)] (for grants authorized under sections 702 and 703 of such Act) [42 U.S.C. 3102, 3103], section 312 of the Housing Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 1452b], section 701(b) of the Housing Act of 1954,1 and section 708 of the Housing Act of 1961 [42 U.S.C. 1500d], shall give a priority to any State or unit of local government or agency thereof which is severely and adversely affected by a reduction in the level of expenditure or employment at any Department of Defense installation located in or near such State or unit of local government.

(Pub. L. 93–117, §14, Oct. 2, 1973, 87 Stat. 423.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 103 of the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1453], section 111 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 [42 U.S.C. 3311], sections 702 and 703 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 [42 U.S.C. 3102, 3103], and section 708 of the Housing Act of 1961 [42 U.S.C. 1500d], referred to in text, were omitted from the Code pursuant to section 5316 of this title which terminated the authority to make grants or loans under those sections after Jan. 1, 1975.

Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, referred to in text, is section 701 of act Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, 68 Stat. 640, which was classified to section 461 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §313(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 398.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of title I of the Housing Act of 1949 which comprises this subchapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Understanding memory loss.**
 
2007 | 2010 | 2015 | 2018
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3852:M 51/
Item Number:0447-A-26 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001101309
 
July 11, 2019
#### Emil K. Ellis, Respondent, v. Herbert Mitchell, Respondent; Robert I. Lennon, Appellant, and Charles Zarkin et al., Respondents.

Present — Peek, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 767, 823.]
§ 12.303 Pre-decision conferences. ( a ) During the time period permitted for discovery pursuant to § 12.30(d), and thereafter, Administrative Law Judges may, in their discretion, conduct one or more pre-decision conferences to be held in Washington, DC, or by telephone, with all parties for the purposes of: ( 1 ) Discussing the advisability of electing the voluntary decisional procedure;
( 2 ) Encouraging a settlement of the entire case, or any part thereof (such discussions may be *ex parte* with the consent of all parties);
( 3 ) Simplifying or clarifying issues;
( 4 ) Obtaining stipulations, admissions of fact and of authenticity of documents;
( 5 ) Discussing amendments or supplements to the pleadings;
( 6 ) Encouraging an early settlement of disputes relating to discovery; and
( 7 ) Discussing any matters of relevance in the proceeding.
( b ) At or following the conclusion of a pre-decision conference, Administrative Law Judges may serve a pre-decision memorandum and order setting forth the agreements reached by the parties, any procedural determinations made by them, and the issues for resolution not disposed of by admissions or agreements by the parties. Such an order shall control the subsequent course of the proceeding unless modified to prevent injustice.
[49 FR 6621, Feb. 22, 1984, as amended at 57 FR 20638, May 14, 1992; 86 FR 64358, Nov. 18, 2021]
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Angela Greenman (630) 829-9662/e-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-23 June 4, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

 Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

 NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO PRESENT ITS FINDINGS

 ON GAS BURN IN SPENT FUEL CASK AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT

 

 A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Augmented Inspection Team

will meet Friday (June 7) with Wisconsin Electric Power Company

officials to discuss the findings of its review of a hydrogen gas

burn in a spent fuel storage container May 28 at the Point Beach

Nuclear Power Station. The Station is near Two Rivers,

Wisconsin.

 The meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the Two Creeks Town Hall,

located at State Highway 42 and Tapawingo Road north of Two

Rivers, Wisconsin.

 The six-person inspection team is headed by Roy Caniano, a

Branch Chief from the NRC's Region III Office. Dr. Carl

Paperiello, Director of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Material

Safety and Safeguards, and other NRC staff members will also

attend the meeting.

 The hydrogen gas burn occurred as technicians were beginning

to weld a shield lid on the spent fuel storage container after it

was loaded with 24 fuel assemblies. There was no evidence of

damage to the storage container or to the fuel assemblies as a

result of the gas burn.

 The spent fuel assemblies were subsequently placed back in

the spent fuel storage pool. 

 The investigation into the cause of the incident is

focussing on a zinc-based coating used on internal surfaces of

the container. The coating may have reacted chemically with the

acidic water from the spent fuel storage pool to produce

hydrogen.

 The meeting between the NRC staff and Wisconsin Electric

officials will be open to public observation. At the close of

the meeting there will be an opportunity for questions and

comments from members of the public.

 The team will issue a written report in several weeks.
#### In the Matter of Richard A. Magelaner et al., Respondents, v Terence Y. Park, Appellant, and John Bena et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Terence Y. Park, Appellant, et al., Petitioners, v Richard A. Magelaner et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[819 NYS2d 488]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Terence Y. Park as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2006, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly, 22nd Assembly District, and a related proceeding, inter alia, to validate his designating petition, Terence Y. Park appeals (1) from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated August 7, 2006, and entered in proceeding No. 1, which, after a hearing, granted the petition to invalidate and restrained the Board of Elections of the City of New York from placing his name on the appropriate ballot, and (2), as limited by his brief, from so much of a final order of the same court, also dated August 7, 2006, and entered in proceeding No. 2, as denied the petition to validate and dismissed that proceeding.

Ordered that the final order entered in proceeding No. 1 is reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petition to invalidate is denied, and proceeding No. 1 is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the final order entered in proceeding No. 2 is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petition to validate is granted, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to place the name of Terence Y. Park on the appropriate ballot.

*488Terence Y. Park’s amended cover sheet was in substantial compliance with the Election Law and the rules promulgated by the Board of Elections of the City of New York (hereinafter the Board) and presented no danger of fraud or confusion either to the Board or to the voters *(see*Election Law § 6-134 [10]; 9 NYCRR 6215.6 [a]; *Matter of Pearse v New York City Bd. of Elections,*10 AD3d 461, 462 [2004]; *Matter of Siems v Lite,*307 AD2d 1016 [2003]; *Matter of Most v Walker,*297 AD2d 356, 357 [2002]; *Matter of Jonas v Black,*104 AD2d 466 [1984], *affd*63 NY2d 685 [1984]). As a result, the Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to invalidate the designating petition *(see*9 NYCRR 6215.7 [d]) and in denying the petition to validate the designating petition *(see Matter of Pearse v New York City Bd. of Elections,*10 AD3d at 462). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Luciano, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 190.10 Current records during business as usual.

A person that is a futures commission merchant is required to maintain current records relating to its customers' accounts, including copies of all account agreements and related account documentation, and “know your customer” materials, pursuant to §§ 1.31, 1.35, 1.36, and 1.37 of this chapter, which may be provided to another futures commission merchant to facilitate the transfer of open commodity contracts or other customer property held by such person for or on behalf of its customers to the other futures commission merchant, in the event an order for relief is entered with respect to such person.
Searched for **https://fbi.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://fbi.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of SENSOR SYSTEM SOLUTIONS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Michael Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated this 15th day of May, 2006.
                                                 /s/ Michael Young
                                                 -----------------
                                                 Michael Young
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3702 

To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, 

or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge 

or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2011 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. TONKO, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. RUSH, Ms. HIRONO, 

Ms. HAHN, and Mr. JACKSON of Illinois) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a 

declaration of war, or any similar authority shall not 

authorize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Due Process Guar5 antee Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3702 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF 

2 CITIZENS AND LAWFUL PERMANENT RESI3 DENTS. 

4 Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(b)(1) An authorization to use military force, a dec11 laration of war, or any similar authority shall not author12 ize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or 

13 lawful permanent resident of the United States appre14 hended in the United States, unless an Act of Congress 

15 expressly authorizes such detention. 

16 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use 

17 military force, a declaration of war, or any similar author18 ity enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

19 of the Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### subpart 1—national clean energy technology transfer programs
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-17-0017:  Proposed Revision to NUREG-1530 - Reassessment of NRCs Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy

Accession Number: ML16147A293

Date Released: Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16147A319 - SECY-17-0017:  Proposed Revision to NUREG-1530, "Reassessment of NRC's Dollar per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy" (6 page(s), 1/30/2017)
    - ML16147A392 - SECY-17-0017:  Enclosure 1 - Revision 1, "Reassessment of NRC's Dollar Per Person Rem Conversion Factory Policy," Final Report (59 page(s), 1/20/2017)
    - ML16147A501 - SECY-17-0017:  Enclosure 2 - NUREG-1530, Revision 1 - NRC Staff Responses to Public Comments on Draft NUREG-1530, Revision 1: "Reassessment of NRC's Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy" (23 page(s), 1/30/2017)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Pain: you can get help.**
 
2010 | 2015 | 2018
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:P 16/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001099629
 
July 11, 2019
Issue Date: 11/09/16 1 16-029 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS 

Change Notice 16-029

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date 

1. IMC 1245 App C12 02/01/16 IMC 1245 App C12 11/09/16 

2. IMC 2201 App A 09/22/15 IMC02201 App A 11/09/16 

3. TI 2515/192 11/09/16 

4. TI 2600/016 12/17/15 TI 2600/016 11/09/16 

TRAINING: No 

REMARKS: IMC 1245 App C12, “Safety Culture Assessor Training and Qualification Journal,” 

has been revised to add two training courses which were agreed upon by the 

IMC 1245 working group. 

 IMC 2201 App A, “Security Baseline Inspection Program,” has been revised to 

reflect the resource estimate associated with the conduct of the nominal range of 

inspection requirements in each inspectable area. 

 TI 2515/192, “Inspection of the Licensee’s Interim Compensatory Measures 

Associated with the Open Phase Condition (OPC) Design Vulnerabilities In 

Electric Power Systems,” is an initial issuance to verify implementation of interim 

compensatory measures associated with an open phase condition (OPC) design 

vulnerability in electric power system for operating reactors. 

 TI 2600/016, “Inspection of Activities Associated with NRC Generic Letter 2015-

01, “ has been revised to extend the completion schedule to the end of the 

second quarter of calendar year 2017, and extend the expiration date to the end 

of calendar year 2017, to provide sufficient time to draft a summary report. 

DISTRIBUTION: 

 Standard. IMC 1245 App C12, TI 2515/192, TI 2600/016 

 Official Use Only (OUO)-Security Related Information. IMC 2201 App A 

 Please contact: Rick Costa Phone: 301-287-3634 

END
§ 160.2 Model privacy form and examples. ( a ) *Model privacy form.* Use of the model privacy form in appendix A of this part, consistent with the instructions in appendix A, constitutes compliance with the notice content requirements of §§ 160.6 and 160.7 of this part, although use of the model privacy form is not required.
( b ) *Examples.* The examples in this part are not exclusive. Compliance with an example, to the extent applicable, constitutes compliance with this part.
[74 FR 62974, Dec. 1, 2009]
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Merton Corn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 9, 2006

                                                /s/ MERTON CORN
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Merton Corn, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       29
### §14142. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14142 was editorially reclassified as section 12602 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10(b)  


 
 

Summary of CBS Corporation Compensation for Outside Directors
  (As of May 23, 2007)    
    


Directors
of CBS Corporation (the "Company") who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (the "Outside Directors") receive compensation for their service on the Board of Directors
as follows: 


Cash Compensation  



	•
	An
annual retainer of $60,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, plus a per meeting attendance fee of $2,000; and



	•
	The
Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees each receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in
advance, and the members of those committees receive a per meeting attendance fee of $2,000. 




Outside
Directors may elect to defer their cash compensation under the CBS Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors, or any successor plan. 




Equity Compensation  



 Stock Options:  


	•
	an
initial grant of 12,734 stock options to purchase shares of the Company's Class B common stock on the date the director first joins the Board or becomes an Outside
Director, which options vest one year from the date of grant; and



	•
	an
annual grant of 5,093 stock options to purchase shares of the Company's Class B common stock on January 31st of each year, which options vest in three equal
annual installments, on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. 




The
exercise price of the stock options is the closing price of the Company's Class B common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") on the date of grant. 


 Restricted Share Units (RSUs):  


	•
	an
annual grant of RSUs on January 31st of each year equal to $75,000 in value based on the closing price of the Company's Class B common stock on the NYSE on
the date of grant, which RSUs vest one year from the date of grant. 




RSUs
are payable to Outside Directors in shares of the Company's Class B common stock upon vesting unless the Outside Director elects to defer settlement of the RSUs to a future date. Outside
Directors are entitled to receive dividend equivalents on the RSUs in the event the Company pays a regular cash dividend on its Class B common stock. Dividend equivalents will accrue on the
RSUs (including deferred RSUs) in accordance with the 2005 RSU Plan for Outside Directors until the RSUs are settled, at which time the dividend equivalents are payable in shares of Class B
common stock, with fractional shares paid in cash. 




Other  



 Expenses  


Outside
Directors are reimbursed for expenses (including travel and lodging) in accordance with the Company's normal travel policies incurred in attending Board, committee and stockholder meetings. 












QuickLinks


Summary of CBS Corporation Compensation for Outside Directors (As of May 23, 2007)