alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2019-2 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A..

Date:  June 17, 2022



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---
### subpart iii—general provisions
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

I-96-83 December 19, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER TO MAINE YANKEE,

SENDS TWO SPECIALISTS TO PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a letter to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company confirming the company's agreement to complete

a number of actions before restarting its Maine Yankee nuclear plant in Wiscassett, Maine.

Maine Yankee officials also have agreed not to restart the plant without the concurrence of NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller.

The confirmatory action letter results from a number of cable separation and safety related logic testing problems found at the plant over the past

several weeks. Two specialists, one from NRC headquarters and another from the regional office in King of Prussia, Pa., have been sent to Maine Yankee

to assess the extent of the problem. Results of their findings will be published early next year.

Maine Yankee shut down the plant on December 5 after finding that certain cables did not have the proper separation required by the plant's design and

licensing basis to protect them during accident conditions. The utility discovered the problem while conducting reviews called for by a generic letter the

NRC sent to nuclear power plant licensees earlier this year.

In his letter to the company, Mr. Miller noted that, on two occasions since the plant's shutdown, Maine Yankee's plan for determining the extent of cable

separation problems had proved insufficient. The company has since revised its approach to assessing the scope of the problem.

NRC's confirmatory action letter provides that prior to restarting the plant, Maine Yankee will:

1. Complete the initial review of the testing of safety-related logic circuits pursuant to NRC Generic Letter No. 96-01. The company had previously

agreed to complete this review by the end of this year, and now will complete the review either prior to restart or by year's end, whichever comes first.

2. Develop a plan and methodology for ensuring that all safety significant cable separation problems are identified and appropriately resolved in

accordance with the plant's licensing and design bases.

3. Evaluate the root cause of the problem in a way that will address all hardware deficiencies identified, and use this information to validate the

comprehensiveness of corrective actions.

4. Meet with NRC representatives in the Region I office to describe the results and conclusions of its review.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 100 (Thursday, May 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30860-30861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12304]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Massachusetts Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Massachusetts Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:00 p.m. (ET) on Wednesday, June 19, 2013, at the McCarter and 
English Law Office, 265 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110. The purpose 
of the meeting is for project planning.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Tuesday, July 19, 
2013. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to 
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional

[[Page 30861]]

information may contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on May 20, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-12304 Filed 5-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3540 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the tax benefits 

for child care assistance for military families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2011 

Mr. CARTER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. COURTNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the tax benefits for child care assistance for military families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Families Child 

5 Care Assistance Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN TAX BENEFITS FOR CHILD CARE AS7 SISTANCE FOR MILITARY FAMILIES. 

8 (a) DEPENDENT CARE TAX CREDIT.—Subsection (e) 

9 of section 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3540 IH

1 amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(11) INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR MILITARY

4 FAMILIES.—In the case of an individual who has 

5 served on active duty (other than active duty for 

6 training) in the Armed Forces of the United States 

7 for a period of 120 days or more beginning after 

8 September 11, 2001, paragraphs (1) and (2) of sub9 section (c) shall be applied by substituting ‘$5,000’ 

10 and ‘$10,000’ for ‘$3,000’ and ‘$6,000’, respec11 tively.’’. 

12 (b) EMPLOYER-PROVIDED DEPENDENT CARE AS13 SISTANCE PROGRAMS.—Paragraph (2) of section 129(a) 

14 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add15 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(D) INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR MILI17 TARY FAMILIES.—In the case of an individual 

18 who has served on active duty (other than ac19 tive duty for training) in the Armed Forces of 

20 the United States for a period of 120 days or 

21 more beginning after September 11, 2001, sub22 paragraph (A) shall be applied by substituting 

23 ‘$10,000’ and ‘$5,000’ for ‘$5,000’ and 

24 ‘$2,500’, respectively.’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3540 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in tax3 able years beginning after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 89 FR 71805, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 1.6 Anti-evasion. ( a ) It shall be unlawful to conduct activities outside the United States, including entering into agreements, contracts, and transactions and structuring entities, to willfully evade or attempt to evade any provision of the Commodity Exchange Act as enacted by Subtitle A of the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 or the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission promulgated thereunder (*Subtitle A*).
( b ) The form, label, and written documentation of an agreement, contract, or transaction, or an entity, shall not be dispositive in determining whether the agreement, contract, or transaction, or entity, has been entered into or structured to willfully evade as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) An activity conducted outside the United States to evade as provided in paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to the provisions of Subtitle A.
( d ) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no agreement, contract, or transaction structured as a security (including a security-based swap) under the securities laws (as defined in section 3(a)(47) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(47))) shall be deemed a swap pursuant to this section.
[77 FR 48354, Aug. 13, 2012]
The National Map—New Data Delivery Homepage, 

Advanced Viewer, Lidar Visualization

https://www.usgs.gov/NationalMap/data

As one of the cornerstones of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) National Geospatial Program, The National Map is a collaborative effort among the USGS and other Federal, State, and local partners to improve and deliver topographic information for the Nation. 

The National Map is featuring direct links to new and improved GIS data access utilities on a refreshed data delivery homepage at 

https://www.usgs.gov/NationalMap/data. From the homepage, users can now quickly access topographical map products, GIS data, 

and the full suite of The National Map’s applications and visualization services.

Viewer Download Client Lidar Explorer

The following is a list of some of the capabilities available through the National Map applications.

• Create and export maps using The National Map’s online data. Even import your own data into the viewer for display and map

creation.

• Search or browse The National Map’s extensive data catalog and select from several methods for downloading.

• Find and explore lidar point clouds in 3D through the Lidar Explorer.

• Access current and historical topo maps available in GeoPDF and GeoTIFF formats.

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Fact Sheet 2019–3032

June 2019
Live Data for your Applications:

Five web base maps and more than 40 thematic data layers are 

available as overlays.

Base Maps

Five cached high-performance base maps are available to 1:9000 

scale—Cloud hosted for reliability, Topo and Imagery Topo for 

rich cartographic rendering, and Shaded Only and Imagery Only 

for backdrops. https://www.usgs.gov/NationalMap/web-services

Overlay Map Services

Sample Overlay Services—Available in Viewer and Other 

Applications

National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Services—Dynamic large 

scale NHD overlay with flow direction and other significant 

hydrographic features.

New 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Elevation Layers—Slope, 

Hillshade, Stretched Hillshade, Aspect Map, Contours, and 

more.

Geographic Names (GNIS)—Official U.S. geographic names 

service showing physical features, cities and towns, schools, 

police stations, cemeteries, and more.

Spatial Index Services (Planned Lidar, Elevation Index, and Topo 

Map Index)

3DEP Elevation Index service shows the resolution of available 

elevation data.

US Topo availability service shows the vintage of the most 

current map product.

Other Developer Resources

Application program interfaces (APIs) and Cloud Access—Most 

products are available from the cloud, and most of the lidar is 

available as Entwine Point Tiles, allowing visualization and 

analysis ready data access.

https://www.usgs.gov/NationalMap/apps

https://www.usgs.gov/NationalMap/data

ISSN 2327-6916 (print)

ISSN 2327-6932 (online)

https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20193032
§ 201.302 Record of hearings. ( a ) *Recordation.* Unless ordered otherwise by the hearing officer or the Commission, all hearings shall be recorded and a written transcript thereof shall be prepared.
( b ) *Availability of a transcript.* Transcripts of public hearings shall be available for purchase at prescribed rates. Transcripts of nonpublic proceedings, and transcripts subject to a protective order pursuant to § 201.322, shall be available for purchase only by parties; provided, however, that any person compelled to submit data or evidence in a hearing may purchase a copy of his or her own testimony.
( c ) *Transcript correction.* Prior to the filing of post-hearing briefs or proposed findings and conclusions, or within such earlier time as directed by the Commission or the hearing officer, a party or witness may make a motion to correct the transcript. Proposed corrections of the transcript may be submitted to the hearing officer by stipulation pursuant to § 201.324, or by motion. Upon notice to all parties to the proceeding, the hearing officer may, by order, specify corrections to the transcript.
### §10606. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–405, title I, §102(c), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2264

Section, Pub. L. 101–647, title V, §502, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4820, related to rights of crime victims. See section 3771 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE

TO THE

CELGENE CORPORATION

1995 NON EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ INCENTIVE PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JUNE 22, 1999

AND AS FURTHER AMENDED)




WHEREAS, the Celgene Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Celgene Corporation 1995 Non
Employee Directors’ Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of June 22, 1999 and as further
amended (the “Plan”);



WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may at any time, and from time to time, amend, in whole or in part, any or all of the
provisions of the Plan; and




WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan, effective as of June 12, 2007.



NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Article 11 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as
of June 12, 2007, as follows:




1. Section 4(b) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“(b) each year on and after the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Corporation to be held on June 12, 2007, upon the date of initial election
or appointment as a member of the Board, each new Non Employee Director
shall receive an Option to purchase 25,000 shares of Common Stock, subject
to the adjustment as provided in Section 9;”




2. Section 5(d) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“(d) each year on and after the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Corporation to be held on June 12, 2007 (each, an “Annual Meeting”) each
Non Employee Director who has been elected at such Annual Meeting and is
continuing as a member of the Board as of the completion of such Annual
Meeting shall receive Options to purchase an aggregate of 18,500 shares of
Common Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 9) in
substantially equal quarterly grants beginning in September, 2007; provided,
however, that a Non Employee Director who has been elected at such Annual
Meeting and is continuing as a member of the Board as of the completion of
such Annual Meeting but has not been a member of the Board during the
entire period between such Annual Meeting and the prior Annual Meeting shall
receive Options to purchase an aggregate number of shares equal to the
product of (i) 18,500 and (ii) a fraction, numerator of which is the number
of days in the 12 month period immediately preceding such Annual Meeting
during which such Non
Employee Director was a Non Employee Director and the denominator is 365;
and”




3. The last sentence of Section 7(b) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“The Option granted pursuant to Sections 5(c) and 5(d) shall vest in full on
the date of the first Annual Meeting held following the date of grant if the
holder thereof has been a Non Employee Director of the Corporation at all
times from such date of grant to the date of such Annual Meeting.”
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

February 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 00

- 00296

- CR

Edward M. JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1998

- CR

- 6320

Honor able Mark A. Luitjen , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Reformation of Judgment is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Dick’s Restaurant and Bar, Inc., Respondent, v. Bessie Rosenwasser et al., Individually and as Copartners, Defendants, and Harry Simon, Individually and as a Copartner, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore, J., concurs to affirm as follows: On the motion to dismiss for insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice we must assume the truth of all allegations of the complaint factually setting forth that the arbitration in question was merely *pro forma*and a fabrication to evade the Emergency Rent Laws. If this is so, the arbitration was entirely null and void, the provisions of section 1463 of the Civil PraeHce Act are not applicable and in such case the arbitration and the order confirming it may, if proper proof is adduced, be vacated. The Emergency Rent Laws make void any waiver by the tenant of their provisions (L. 1945, eh. 314, as amd. by L. 1946, eh. 273, eff. March 30, 1946.) Whether what plaintiff alleges is true, must await raising of issues by answer including any defenses defendants may interpose and proper proof under such issues so raised. [195 Misc. 179.]
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Sciences & Software HoldingsCorp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Michael M. Megless       Michael M. Megless  Chief Financial Officer  Spectrum Sciences & Software Holdings Corp.  Date:                                         
26
§ 23.17 Misuse of the words “brilliant” and “full cut.” It is unfair or deceptive to use the unqualified expressions “brilliant,” “brilliant cut,” or “full cut” to describe, identify, or refer to any diamond except a round diamond that has at least thirty-two (32) facets plus the table above the girdle and at least twenty-four (24) facets below. Note to § 23.17 :
Such terms should not be applied to single or rose-cut diamonds. They may be applied to emerald-(rectangular) cut, pear-shaped, heart-shaped, oval-shaped, and marquise-(pointed oval) cut diamonds meeting the above-stated facet requirements when, in immediate conjunction with the term used, the form of the diamond is disclosed.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Charles Roberts.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.