alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.309 Fees. ( a ) The only fee to be charged to a requester under this part is for the duplication of records to be disclosed to the requester. No fee will be charged or collected for: search, retrieval, or review of records; or duplication at the initiative of the Commission without a request from the requester. Fees for duplication will be charged at rates set forth on the FOIA web page of the Commission's website at *www.sec.gov .* Fees for duplication include any costs incurred in making records available on electronic storage devices.
( b ) With regard to requests for amendment or correction, the Commission will provide the requester one copy of each record corrected or amended pursuant to his or her request without charge as evidence of the correction or amendment.
( c ) Whenever the Office of FOIA Services determines that good cause exists to grant a request for reduction or waiver of fees for duplication costs, it may reduce or waive any such fees.
### §16296. Low-volume oil and gas reservoir research program

#### (a) Definition of GIS

In this section, the term "GIS" means geographic information systems technology that facilitates the organization and management of data with a geographic component.

#### (b) Program

The Secretary shall establish a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application to maximize the productive capacity of marginal wells and reservoirs.

#### (c) Data collection

Under the program, the Secretary shall collect data on—

(1) the status and location of marginal wells and oil and gas reservoirs;

(2) the production capacity of marginal wells and oil and gas reservoirs;

(3) the location of low-pressure gathering facilities and pipelines; and

(4) the quantity of natural gas vented or flared in association with crude oil production.

#### (d) Analysis

Under the program, the Secretary shall—

(1) estimate the remaining producible reserves based on variable pipeline pressures; and

(2) recommend measures that will enable the continued production of those resources.

#### (e) Study

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may award a grant to an organization of States that contain significant numbers of marginal oil and natural gas wells to conduct an annual study of low-volume natural gas reservoirs.

#### (2) Organization with no GIS capabilities

If an organization receiving a grant under paragraph (1) does not have GIS capabilities, the organization shall contract with an institution of higher education with GIS capabilities.

#### (3) State geologists

The organization receiving a grant under paragraph (1) shall collaborate with the State geologist of each State being studied.

#### (f) Public information

The Secretary may use the data collected and analyzed under this section to produce maps and literature to disseminate to States to promote conservation of natural gas reserves.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §966, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 893.)
| **Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                                         |           |           |   |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                                             | $ 0.37         | $ 0.35         | $ 2.74 | $ 2.70 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=120397183&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### §1397n–11. Regulations

The Secretary, in consultation with the Federal Interagency Council on Social Impact Partnerships, may issue regulations as necessary to carry out this division.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2062, as added Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title VIII, §50802(2), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 282.)
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:February 16, 2007              /s/ Wayne A. Pratt   Wayne A. Pratt   Chief Financial Officer
#### §§ 149.112-149.129 [Reserved]
### §14504. Liability for noneconomic loss

#### (a) General rule

In any civil action against a volunteer, based on an action of a volunteer acting within the scope of the volunteer's responsibilities to a nonprofit organization or governmental entity, the liability of the volunteer for noneconomic loss shall be determined in accordance with subsection (b).

#### (b) Amount of liability

#### (1) In general

Each defendant who is a volunteer, shall be liable only for the amount of noneconomic loss allocated to that defendant in direct proportion to the percentage of responsibility of that defendant (determined in accordance with paragraph (2)) for the harm to the claimant with respect to which that defendant is liable. The court shall render a separate judgment against each defendant in an amount determined pursuant to the preceding sentence.

#### (2) Percentage of responsibility

For purposes of determining the amount of noneconomic loss allocated to a defendant who is a volunteer under this section, the trier of fact shall determine the percentage of responsibility of that defendant for the claimant's harm.

(Pub. L. 105–19, §5, June 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 221.)
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

§ 200.113 Opportunity to respond; interception. ( a ) *Opportunity to respond.* All participants to a proceeding may respond to any allegations or contentions contained in a prohibited ex parte communication placed in the public record in accordance with § 200.112. Such responses shall be included in the public record.
( b ) *Interception of communications.* All written communications addressed to the Commission respecting a proceeding will be deemed to be communications to the staff of the interested division and will be directed to that division by the Commission's mail room. A Commission member or decisional employee may instruct any of his assistants who are nondecisional employees to intercept any communication directed to him which might appear to violate this Code and authorize them either to transmit any such written communication to the staff of the interested division of the Commission, if it appears from the contents of the communication that the intent of the sender is consistent with such action, or to return the communication to the sender.
[28 FR 4447, May 3, 1963, as amended at 42 FR 14691, Mar. 16, 1977]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SRM-SECY-16-0022:  Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:  Fiscal Year 2015

Accession Number: ML16104A394

Date Released: Thursday, June 2, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16110A142 - SRM-SECY-16-0022:  Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:  Fiscal Year 2015 (1 page(s), 4/18/2016)
    - ML16110A149 - SRM-SECY-16-0022:  Enclosure 1 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:  Fiscal Year 2015 (50 page(s), 4/18/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3901 

For the relief of Dr. Shakeel Afridi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2012 

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Dr. Shakeel Afridi. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATURALIZATION FOR DR. SHAKEEL AFRIDI. 

4 Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act, or any other provision of law relating to nat6 uralization, Dr. Shakeel Afridi is deemed to be a natural7 ized citizen of the United States as of the date of the en8 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70687-70695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 68]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and 
other Federal agencies to comment on the proposed information 
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 6, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to David Rostker, Office of Management 
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB, Room 
10202, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-3897.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: Ex-Im Bank Letter of Interest Application, 
EIB Form 95-9.
    OMB Number: 3048-0005.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to determine 
eligibility for an indicative offer of support under the loan and 
guarantee programs.
    Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions.
    Respondents: Entities involved in the provision of financing or 
arranging of financing for foreign buyers of U.S. exports.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 500.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 20 Minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 165.
    Frequency of Response: When applying for a Letter of Interest.

    Dated: November 30, 2004.
Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M

[[Page 70688]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.000


[[Page 70689]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.001


[[Page 70690]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.002


[[Page 70691]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.003


[[Page 70692]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.004


[[Page 70693]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.005


[[Page 70694]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.006


[[Page 70695]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07DE04.007

[FR Doc. 04-26679 Filed 12-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-C
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROJECTS HONORING VICTIMS OF TERRORIST ATTACKS
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00209-CV

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

TEXAS, Appellant

V.

KAREN SIMMONS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-75783

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 30, 2021. After a motion 

for new trial was timely filed, the notice of appeal was filed March 18, 2022.

Appellant has not paid the filing fee of $205.00, and no evidence that appellant 

is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs 

has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. On April 28, 2022, the court ordered appellant 

to pay the filing fee on or before May 19, 2022, and further warned appellant that if 
2

it did not do so, the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5. As of the date of this opinion, appellant has not paid the filing fee. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with court order or

notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.649 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 200.650, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
#### § 802.20 [Reserved]
§ 781.3 Scope of the APR. The Additional Protocol Regulations or APR implement certain obligations of the United States under the Protocol Additional to the Agreement Between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency Concerning the Application of Safeguards in the United States of America, known as the Additional Protocol. ( a ) *Persons and locations subject to the APR.* The APR, promulgated by the Department of Commerce, shall apply to all persons and locations in the United States, *except*: ( 1 ) Locations that are subject to the regulatory authority of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), pursuant to the NRC's regulatory jurisdiction under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*); and
( 2 ) The following *United States Government locations* (see definition in § 781.1 of the APR): ( i ) Department of Energy locations;
( ii ) Department of Defense locations;
( iii ) Central Intelligence Agency locations; and
( iv ) Department of State locations.
( b ) *Activities subject to the APR.* The activities that are subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements described in the APR are found in parts 783 and 784 of this subchapter (APR).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 04, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 04, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0136. RAYMOND J. BROWN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14D1861
No: IV-16-010 April 13, 2016

CONTACT: Victor Dricks 817-200-1128

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference to Discuss 

Apparent Violations at International Isotopes

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from International Isotopes, Inc. 

on May 3, to discuss four apparent violations identified by NRC inspectors related to an incident in 

which a worker at the company’s facility in Idaho Falls, Idaho, received an unplanned radiation 

exposure.

The meeting at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 East Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas, is 

open to public observation and will begin at 8 a.m. CDT. NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions from the public after the business portion of the conference. A telephone bridge will be 

available for the meeting by calling 1-888-603-7036 and entering passcode 14892.

A worker was preparing to transfer a Cobalt-60 source from a storage cask to a therapy device 

on August 20, 2015, when he received an unplanned exposure. Although the radiation dose to the 

worker exceeded NRC limits, he is not expected to suffer any adverse health consequences. The NRC 

dispatched an inspector to the site the following day to monitor the licensee’s response to the event and 

follow-up actions.

The purpose of this pre-decisional enforcement conference is to discuss four apparent violations 

identified by the NRC: (1) failure to control the radiation dose to a worker within NRC regulatory 

limits; (2) failure to have adequate procedures in place that assured a safety evaluation was completed 

for a proposed use of radioactive material and approved by the radiation safety committee prior to its 

use; (3) failure to obtain prior NRC approval for activities that had not been documented, reviewed, and 

approved by the company’s radiation safety committee; and (4) failure to stop work as required by 

procedure when a worker’s electronic dosimeter alarmed. The apparent violations are discussed in an 

inspection report.

No decision on the final safety significance of the violations or any additional NRC actions will 

be made at the meeting. That decision will be announced at a later time.
### §16935. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16935 was editorially reclassified as section 21501 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### American News Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Avon Publishing Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30752 Summary Calendar

JUAN P. VERRETTE, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CHARLES CODY, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:07-CV-547
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles Cody, Louisiana prisoner # 1 0 1 4 5 0 , appeals the district court’s judgment finding him 60% at fa ult for causing Juan P. Verrette’s, Louisiana prisoner # 128135, injuries and awarding damages of $75,000 for p a i n and suffering. Cody contends that it was unfair to assign him damages and hold him

more at fault than Verrette since Verrette initiated the confrontation and prison norms demanded that Cody respond. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary4, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30752 Document: 00512100857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2013No. 11-30752

The allocation of fault and assessment of damages are factual findings reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Hernandez v. M/V Rajaan , 841 F.2d 582, 587 (5th Cir. 1988) (d a m a ges); Transorient Navigators Co., S.A. v. M/S Southwi n d , 788 F.2d 288, 291 (5th Cir. 1986) (fault). A factual finding is not clearly erroneous so long as it is “plausible in ligh t o f the record viewed in its entirety.” Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, N.C. , 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985). From the evidenc e , th e district court could plausibly find that Cody

a s s aulted and seriously injured Verrette as Verrette was walking away. Therefore, the assignment of damages and a greater portion of fault to Cody was plausible in light of the record as a whole and not clearly erroneous. See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-30752 Document: 00512100857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2013