alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-18824; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-50]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class D and Class E airspace at Joplin, MO.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 29, 2004 (69 FR 58047). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 8, 2004.

Anthony D. Roetzel,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-26101  Filed 11-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 210.6A-02 Special rules applicable to employee stock purchase, savings and similar plans. The financial statements filed for persons to which this article is applicable shall be prepared in accordance with the following special rules in addition to the general rules in §§ 210.1-01 to 210.4-10. Where the requirements of a special rule differ from those prescribed in a general rule, the requirements of the special rule shall be met. ( a ) *Investment programs.* If the participating employees have an option as to the manner in which their deposits and contributions may be invested, a description of each investment program shall be given in a footnote or otherwise. The number of employees under each investment program shall be stated.
( b ) *Net asset value per unit.* Where appropriate, the number of units and the net asset value per unit shall be given by footnote or otherwise.
( c ) *Federal income taxes.* ( 1 ) If the plan is not subject to Federal income taxes, a note shall so state indicating briefly the principal assumptions on which the plan relied in not making provision for such taxes.
( 2 ) State the Federal income tax status of the employee with respect to the plan.
( d ) *Valuation of assets.* The statement of financial condition shall reflect all investments at value, showing cost parenthetically. For purposes of this rule, the term *value* shall mean ( 1 ) market value for those securities having readily available market quotations and
( 2 ) fair value as determined in good faith by the trustee(s) for the plan (or by the person or persons who exercise similar responsibilities) with respect to other securities and assets.
[47 FR 56843, Dec. 21, 1982]
### From: John Nord [mailto:manager@devilslakeairport.com] 

### Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 20111:28 PM 

### To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

### Subject: Great Lakes Aviation--EAS Contract Dennis, Please find the attached e-mail from the Mayorof Devils lake, DickJohnson, supporting the decision for Great lakes Aviation to receive the Essential Air Contractforthe DVl route. The Devils Lake Airport is in supportofGreat Lakes Aviation as the EAS carrierfor DVland looks forward to working with them. Their proposed schedule will serve the needs ofourcommunity and region. Thankyou foryour help and support in resolving this issue. Thanks JOHN 

## John l\!L 

## Nord Airpmt Manager Devils Lake Regional Airport I06 National Guard St. NW Devils Lake, ND 58301 Tel: 70l-662-5833 Fax: 701-662-5133

From: DickJohnson [mailto:dick@lrlec.org] 

### Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 201111:38 AM 

### To: 'John Nord' 

### Subject: RE: Great Lakes EAS contract John, -/)

I have read through your email and can confirm that as the Mayor ofthe Cityof Devils Lake, I am in agreement and concur with your thoughts and that of the Devils Lake Airport Authority regarding the arrangements for air service to Devils Lake and the lake region. We need to thank all parties involved fortheir help and assistance in solving this most unfortunate situation. Thanks tothe combined effort we are getting this to resolution. Dick Johnson, Mayor, Cityof Devils Lake

1
EXHIBIT 31.2Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, James W Creamer III, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Across America Real EstateCorp.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure the material information relating to the smallbusiness issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer (s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007 By:  /s/ James W Creamer III   Chief Financial Officer
§ 17.3 Exchange of Federal laboratory personnel with recipients of Federal funding. ( a ) In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 3710a(b)(3)(A) and 3710a(d)(1), a Federal laboratory may provide personnel, services, property, and other resources to a collaborating party, with or without reimbursement (but not funds to non-Federal parties) for the conduct of specified research or development efforts under a CRADA which are consistent with the missions of the Federal laboratory. The existence of a funding agreement between a Federal laboratory and a contractor shall not preclude the Federal laboratory from using its authority under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to enter into a CRADA with the contractor as a collaborating party for the conduct of specified research or development efforts, where the director of the Federal laboratory determines that the technical subject matter of the funding agreement is sufficiently distinct from that of the CRADA. In no event shall a contractor which is a collaborating party transfer funds to a Federal laboratory under a CRADA using funds awarded to the contractor by that laboratory.
( b ) ( 1 ) A Federal laboratory may enter into a CRADA with a contractor as a collaborating party for the purpose of exchange of personnel for the conduct of specified research or development efforts where the determination required under paragraph (a) of this section could not be made, provided that: ( i ) The CRADA includes at least one collaborating party in addition to the Federal laboratory and that contractor; and
( ii ) The Federal laboratory shall not provide services, property or other resources to that contractor under the CRADA.
( 2 ) Where a Federal laboratory enters into a CRADA with a contractor under this paragraph (b), the terms of that contractor's funding agreement shall normally supersede the terms of the CRADA, to the extent that any individual terms conflict, as applied to that contractor and the Federal laboratory only.
( c ) In making the determination required under paragraph (a) of this section, the director of a Federal laboratory may consider factors including the following: ( 1 ) Whether the conduct of specified research or development efforts under the CRADA would require the contractor to perform tasks identical to those required under the funding agreement;
( 2 ) Whether existing intellectual property to be provided by the Federal laboratory or the contractor under the CRADA is the same as that provided under, or referenced in, the funding agreement;
( 3 ) Whether the contractor's employees performing the specified research or development efforts under the CRADA are the same employees performing the tasks required under the funding agreement; and
( 4 ) Whether services, property or other resources contemplated by the Federal laboratory to be provided to the contractor for the specified research or development efforts under the CRADA would materially benefit the contractor in the performance of tasks required under the funding agreement.
Issue Date: 07/21/16 1 16-017

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 16-017

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IP 71114.01 05/29/12 IP 71114.01 07/21/16

2. IP 71114.02 05/29/12 IP 71114.02 07/21/16

3. IP 71114.03 05/29/12 IP 71114.03 07/21/16

4. IP 71114.04 10/31/08 IP 71114.04 07/21/16

5. IP 71114.05 05/29/12 IP 71114.05 07/21/16

6. IP 71114.06 05/29/12 IP 71114.06 07/21/16

7. IP 71114.07 05/29/12 IP 71114.07 07/21/16

8. IP 71114.08 09/19/12 IP 71114.08 07/21/16

TRAINING: No

REMARKS: IP 71114.01, “Exercise Evaluation,” has been revised to address guidance and 

editorial changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925

IP 71114.02, “Alert and Notification System Testing,” has been revised to address 

technical, guidance and editorial changes. Closed feedback form71114-1925.

IP 71114.03, “Emergency Preparedness Organization Staffing and Augmentation 

System,” has been revised to address editorial changes. Closed feedback form 

71114-1925

IP 71114.04, “Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes,” has been 

revised to address editorial changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925.

IP 71114.05, “Maintenance of Emergency Preparedness,” has been revised to 

address guidance and editorial changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925.

IP 71114.06, “Drill Evaluation,” has been revised to address guidance and editorial 

changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925.

IP 71114.07, “Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event,” has been revised 

to address guidance and editorial changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925.

IP 71114.08, “Exercise Evaluation – Scenario Review,” has been revised to 

address guidance and editorial changes. Closed feedback form 71114-1925.
Issue Date: 07/21/16 2 16-017

DISTRIBUTION: 

 Standard

 Official Use Only (OUO)-Security Related Information. 

Please contact: _______________ Phone: ________

END
Cuando comiencen las sacudidas de un terremoto ... 


Tirese, Ciibrase y Agclrrese 


FEMA 529S 9/2014 

~ 

TIRESE al suelo. ,,. 

CUBRASE la cabeza y el cuello con una mano y metase debajo de un escritorio o mesa. 

,,. 

AGARRESE a la pata del escritorio o mesa para que el escritorio o mesa permanezca sobre usted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70505-70506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 29, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750

[[Page 70506]]

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before January 5, 
2005 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0034.
    Form Number: POD 315.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Depositor's Application to Withdraw Postal Savings.
    Description: This form is prepared by the applicant for payment of 
a Postal Savings Account and is used to identify the depositor and 
ensure that payment is made to the proper person. POD form was formerly 
used by the Post Office Department for processing payments when 
payments of accounts were their responsibility.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 700.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 350 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Jiovannah L. Diggs, (202) 874-7662, Financial 
Management Service, Administrative Programs Division, Records and 
Information Management Program, 3700 East West Highway, Room 144, 
Hyattsville, MD 20782.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-26721 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3912 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3912

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2012

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, as the ``Brigadier 
           General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIGADIER GENERAL NATHANIEL WOODHULL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 110 Mastic Road in Mastic Beach, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Brigadier General Nathaniel Woodhull Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brigadier 
General Nathaniel Woodhull Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of ACRO Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gabby Klausner, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  | By: /s/ Gabby KlausnerGabby KlausnerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2008



---

---
§ 23.506 Swap processing and clearing. ( a ) *Swap processing.* ( 1 ) Each swap dealer and major swap participant shall ensure that it has the capacity to route swap transactions not executed on a swap execution facility or designated contract market to a derivatives clearing organization in a manner acceptable to the derivatives clearing organization for the purposes of clearing; and
( 2 ) Each swap dealer and major swap participant shall coordinate with each derivatives clearing organization to which the swap dealer, major swap participant, or its clearing member submits transactions for clearing, to facilitate prompt and efficient swap transaction processing in accordance with the requirements of § 39.12(b)(7) of this chapter.
( b ) *Swap clearing.* With respect to each swap that is not executed on a swap execution facility or a designated contract market, each swap dealer and major swap participant shall: ( 1 ) If such swap is subject to a mandatory clearing requirement pursuant to section 2(h)(1) of the Act and an exception pursuant to 2(h)(7) is not applicable, submit such swap for clearing to a derivatives clearing organization as soon as technologically practicable after execution of the swap, but no later than the close of business on the day of execution; or
( 2 ) If such swap is not subject to a mandatory clearing requirement pursuant to section 2(h)(1) of the Act but is accepted for clearing by any derivatives clearing organization and the swap dealer or major swap participant and its counterparty agree that such swap will be submitted for clearing, submit such swap for clearing not later than the next business day after execution of the swap, or the agreement to clear, if later than execution.
In The Matter Of: 

Michelle Kraemer 

Respondent 

SERVED: May 27, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2441 

Case No. 2015WA910066 

DISMISSAL ORDER 

On May 25, 2016, the parties filed a Stipulated Notice of Settlement, stating that the parties 

had reached a settlement in this matter and that the Complainant withdraws it complaint. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint without the 

C<.?nsent of the administrative law judge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such 

withdrawal, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice 

Attachment: Service List 

~--- DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Brian J. Lawler, Respondent's Counsel 

Pilot Law, P.C. 

1551 9th Avenue 

San Diego, CA 92101 

TEL: 619-255-2398 

FAX: 619-231-4984 

Brian K. Khan, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7313 (Main) 

TEL: 847-294-7652 (Direct) 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Ju,dge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) · 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

. FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2441 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Kenneth J. Anyon, Respondent, v. Dominick R. Palmieri, Appellant.

As a matter of pleading, the defense was sufficient. *(Holmes*v. *Ivanhoe Cleaners & Dyers,*252 App. Div. 765; *Jensen*v. *Brandmaier,*265 App. Div. 1055.) A claim of *res judicata*may be predicated upon a determination of the Justice’s Court. *(Blair*v. *Bartlett,*75 N. Y. 150; *Hallock*v. *Dominy,*69 N. Y. 238; *Smith*v. *Hemstreet,*54 N. Y. 644.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
### §15452. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15452 was editorially reclassified as section 21052 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.