alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3759 

To ensure the viability of a technology described in section 1703(b) of the 

Energy Policy Act of 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2011 

Mrs. SCHMIDT (for herself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TURNER of Ohio, Mr. 

AUSTRIA, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. CHABOT, 

Mr. LATTA, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. TIBERI, and Mr. RENACCI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure the viability of a technology described in section 

1703(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNOLOGY VIABILITY. 

4 Section 1702 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 16512) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(l) TECHNOLOGY VIABILITY.— 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3759 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

2 to take appropriate actions to ensure the viability of 

3 a technology described in section 1703(b) with a po4 tential applicant for a loan guarantee under this 

5 title. Funding for carrying out this subsection may 

6 be derived, to the extent provided in appropriations 

7 Acts, from amounts otherwise authorized to be ap8 propriated for carrying out this title or for other ad9 ministrative purposes of the Department of Energy. 

10 ‘‘(2) FAILURE TO ACHIEVE CRITERIA.—If the 

11 Secretary determines that a person has not achieved 

12 technical criteria as provided under an agreement 

13 entered into between that person and the Secretary 

14 pursuant to this subsection, that person shall, as 

15 soon as practicable, surrender to the Secretary cus16 tody, possession, and control of, and title to, any 

17 real or personal property leased by that person from 

18 the Secretary or otherwise acquired or used, using 

19 funds provided under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §16516. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–58, title XVII, §1705, as added Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title IV, §406(a), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 145, which related to temporary program for rapid deployment of renewable energy and electric power transmission projects, was omitted from the Code due to expiration of authority to enter into guarantees under this section on Sept. 30, 2011.
No. 89-1105.

#### Zinniel et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with the filing of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Biomass Processing Technology, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Robert F. Kendall, CPA, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 14, 2004
    /s/ Robert F. KendallName:
    Robert F. Kendall, CPATitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial
officer)
### §17252. Review of large-scale programs

The Secretary shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences for an independent review and oversight, beginning in 2011, of the programs under section 16293(c) of this title and under section 17251 of this title, to ensure that the benefits of such programs are maximized. Not later than January 1, 2012, the Secretary shall transmit to the Congress a report on the results of such review and oversight.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title VII, §704, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1709; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title IV, §4003(c)(2), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "section 16293(c)" for "section 16293(c)(3)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Name of Subsidiary
    
    OwnershipCCI Southeast, LLC (CCISE)
    
    
    100.00
    %Riverdale Carwash Lot 3A, LLC (Riverdale)
    
    
    100.00
    %AARD-Cypress Sound, LLC (Cypress Sound)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-TSD-CSK Firestone, LLC (Firestone)
    
    
    51.00
    %South Glen Eagles Drive, LLC (West Valley)
    
    
    51.00
    %119th and Ridgeview, LLC (Ridgeview)
    
    
    51.00
    %53rd and Baseline, LLC (Baseline)
    
    
    51.00
    %Hwy 278 and Hwy 170, LLC (Bluffton)
    
    
    51.00
    %State and 130th, LLC (American Fork)
    
    
    51.00
    %Clinton Keith and Hidden Springs, LLC (Murietta)
    
    
    51.00
    %Hwy 46 and Bluffton Pkwy, LLC (Bluffton 46)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Bader Family Dollar Flat Shoals, LLC (Flat Shoals)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Westminster OP7, LLC (Westminster OP7)
    
    
    51.00
    %Eagle Palm I, LLC (Eagle)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Econo Lube Stonegate, LLC (Econo Lube)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Bader Family Dollar MLK, LLC (MLK)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Charmar Greeley, LLC (Starbucks)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Charmar Greeley Firestone, LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD 5020 Lloyd Expy, LLC (Evansville)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD 2245 Main Street, LLC (Plainfield)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD-Buckeye, LLC (Buckeye)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 1, LLC (Esterra Mesa 1)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 2, LLC (Esterra Mesa 2)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 3, LLC (Esterra Mesa 3)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 4, LLC (Esterra Mesa 4)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD MDJ Goddard, LLC (Goddard)
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD Charmar Arlington Boston Pizza, LLC (Charmar Boston Pizza)
    
    
    51.00
    %L-S Corona Pointe, LLC (L-S Corona)
    
    
    50.01
    %AARD LECA LSS Lonestar LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD LECA VL1 LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD NOLA St claude LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD ORFL FD Goldenrod LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD SATX CHA LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %AARD JXFL UTC LLC
    
    
    51.00
    %
### §17035. University based research and development grant program

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a competitive grant program, in a geographically diverse manner, for projects submitted for consideration by institutions of higher education to conduct research and development of renewable energy technologies. Each grant made shall not exceed $2,000,000.

#### (b) Eligibility

Priority shall be given to institutions of higher education with—

(1) established programs of research in renewable energy;

(2) locations that are low income or outside of an urbanized area;

(3) a joint venture with an Indian tribe; and

(4) proximity to trees dying of disease or insect infestation as a source of woody biomass.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $25,000,000 for carrying out this section.

#### (d) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Indian tribe

The term "Indian tribe" has the meaning as defined in section 15823(c) of this title.

#### (2) Renewable energy

The term "renewable energy" has the meaning as defined in section 16181 of this title.

#### (3) Urbanized area

The term "urbanized area" has the meaning as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title II, §234, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1538.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Opinion issued April 25 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00203
- CV

——————————— CINDY THOMPSON, CHAR LES THOMPSON, AND CC & T INVESTMEN TS, LLC , Appella nts V. MAE LANDRY , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 18DCV0421

MEMORANDUM OPINION Cindy Thompson, Charles Thompson, and CC & T Investments, LLC, have filed a petition for permissive appeal, seeking to challenge the trial court's interlocutory order denying their motion for summary judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.3; T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R E M
. C ODE § 51.014(d). W e deny the petition for2

permissive appeal and dismiss the interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Keyes, Higley, and Landau

.
### §14038. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14038 was editorially reclassified as section 12408 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
No: 15-037 June 5, 2015

CONTACT: Maureen Conley, 301-415-8200

NRC Approves Changes to San Onofre Nuclear Plant’s

Emergency Planning Requirements

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted Southern California Edison’s request to alter 

the emergency preparedness plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) in 

San Clemente, Calif., to reflect the plant’s decommissioning status.

The changes come in the form of exemptions from certain NRC requirements that may not be 

appropriate for a plant that has permanently ceased operations. Once the licensee implements the 

exemptions, state and local governments may rely on comprehensive emergency management (“all 

hazard”) planning for off-site emergency response to events at SONGS, rather than having a dedicated 

offsite radiological emergency response plan approved by the Federal Emergency Management 

Agency. As a result, there will not be a 10-mile emergency planning zone identified in the license for 

SONGS. The plant will maintain an onsite emergency plan and response capabilities, including the 

continued notification of state and local government officials for an emergency declaration. 

Southern California Edison provided analyses to show the exemptions are warranted because 

when compared to an operating power reactor, the risk of an offsite radiological release is significantly 

lower and the types of possible accidents significantly fewer at a nuclear power reactor that has 

permanently ceased operations and removed fuel from the reactor vessel. The NRC staff evaluated and 

confirmed these analyses and, based on the NRC staff’s evaluation and recommendation, the 

Commission approved the exemptions March 2. The exemption package, including a safety evaluation, 

was issued June 4.

SONGS is a multi-unit pressurized-water reactor site located in San Diego County. Unit 1 was 

permanently shut down on March 6, 1993, and is currently in the decommissioning phase. Units 2 and 3 

have been shut down since January 2012. All spent fuel has been permanently moved from the reactor 

vessels into the spent fuel pools for storage. The exemptions from certain emergency preparedness 

requirements are part of several changes to the plant’s licensing basis and technical specifications the 

licensee requested to reflect the SONGS site’s decommissioning status.
#### § 229.102 (Item 102) Description of property.

To the extent material, disclose the location and general character of the registrant's principal physical properties. In addition, identify the segment(s), as reported in the financial statements, that use the properties described. If any such property is not held in fee or is held subject to an encumbrance that is material to the registrant, so state and describe briefly how held.

*Instruction 1 to Item 102:* This item requires information that will reasonably inform investors as to the suitability, adequacy, productive capacity, and extent of utilization of the principal physical properties of the registrant and its subsidiaries, to the extent the described properties are material. A registrant should engage in a comprehensive consideration of the materiality of its properties. If appropriate, descriptions may be provided on a collective basis; detailed descriptions of the physical characteristics of individual properties or legal descriptions by metes and bounds are not required and shall not be given.

*Instruction 2 to Item 102:* In determining materiality under this Item, the registrant should take into account both quantitative and qualitative factors. See Instruction 1 to Item 101 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.101).

*Instruction 3 to Item 102:* Registrants engaged in mining operations must refer to and, if required, provide the disclosure under §§ 229.1300 through 229.1305 (subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K), in addition to any disclosure required by this section.

*Instruction 4 to Item 102:* A registrant engaged in oil and gas producing activities shall provide the information required by Subpart 1200 of Regulation S-K.

*Instruction 5 to Item 102:* The definitions in § 210.4-10(a) of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210] shall apply to this Item with respect to oil and gas operations.

*Instruction 6 to Item 102:* The attention of certain issuers engaged in oil and gas producing activities is directed to the information called for in Securities Act Industry Guide 4 (referred to in § 229.801(d)).

*Instruction 7 to Item 102:* The attention of issuers engaged in real estate activities is directed to the information called for in Guide 5 (§ 229.801(e) of this chapter).

[47 FR 11401, Mar. 16, 1982, as amended at 64 FR 1735, Jan. 12, 1999; 73 FR 957, Jan. 4, 2008; 74 FR 2193, Jan. 14, 2009; 83 FR 66444, Dec. 26, 2018; 84 FR 12716, Apr. 2, 2019]
5311.603 Procedures

Department of the Air Force procedures associated with the Defense Priorities and Allocations

System (DPAS) are established in AFI 63-101/20-101, Integrated Life Cycle Management.

Parent topic: Subpart 5311.6 - PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
§ 201.513 Temporary cease-and-desist orders: Issuance without prior notice and opportunity for hearing. In addition to the requirements for issuance of a temporary cease-and-desist order set forth in § 201.512, the following requirements shall apply if a temporary cease-and-desist order is to be entered without prior notice and opportunity for hearing: ( a ) *Basis for issuance without prior notice and opportunity for hearing.* A temporary cease-and-desist order may be issued without notice and opportunity for hearing only if the Commission determines, from specific facts in the record of the proceeding, that notice and hearing prior to entry of an order would be impracticable or contrary to the public interest.
( b ) *Content of the order.* An *ex parte* temporary cease-and-desist order shall state specifically why notice and hearing would have been impracticable or contrary to the public interest.
( c ) *Hearing before the Commission.* If a respondent has been served with a temporary cease-and-desist order entered without a prior Commission hearing, the respondent may apply to the Commission to have the order set aside, limited, or suspended, and if the application is made within 10 days after the date on which the order was served, may request a hearing on such application. The Commission shall hold a hearing and render a decision on the respondent's application at the earliest possible time. The hearing shall begin within two days of the filing of the application unless the applicant consents to a longer period or the Commission, by order, for good cause shown, sets a later date. The Commission shall render a decision on the application within five calendar days of its filing, provided, however, that the Commission, by order, for good cause shown, may extend the time within which a decision may be rendered for a single period of five calendar days, or such longer time as consented to by the applicant. If the Commission does not render its decision within 10 days of the respondent's application or such longer time as consented to by the applicant, the temporary order shall be suspended until a decision is rendered.
( d ) *Presiding officer, procedure at hearing.* Procedures with respect to the selection of a presiding officer and the conduct of the hearing shall be in accordance with § 201.511.
### §13021. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 13021 was editorially reclassified as section 20331 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3772 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3772

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, as the ``First 
            Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT LANDRES CHEEKS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, shall be 
known and designated as the ``First Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 28, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3772

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 150 South Union Street in Canton, Mississippi, as the ``First 
            Sergeant Landres Cheeks Post Office Building''.
```
§ 229.1000 (Item 1000) Definitions. The following definitions apply to the terms used in Regulation M-A (§§ 229.1000 through 229.1016), unless specified otherwise: ( a ) *Associate* has the same meaning as in § 240.12b-2 of this chapter;
( b ) *Instruction C* means General Instruction C to Schedule 13E-3 (§ 240.13e-100 of this chapter) and General Instruction C to Schedule TO (§ 240.14d-100 of this chapter);
( c ) *Issuer tender offer* has the same meaning as in § 240.13e-4(a)(2) of this chapter;
( d ) *Offeror* means any person who makes a tender offer or on whose behalf a tender offer is made;
( e ) *Rule 13e-3 transaction* has the same meaning as in § 240.13e-3(a)(3) of this chapter;
( f ) *Subject company* means the company or entity whose securities are sought to be acquired in the transaction (e.g., the target), or that is otherwise the subject of the transaction;
( g ) *Subject securities* means the securities or class of securities that are sought to be acquired in the transaction or that are otherwise the subject of the transaction; and
( h ) *Third-party tender offer* means a tender offer that is not an issuer tender offer.
̄

012

Miles

Land Structure Type

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

Between Lakes The NORTH

This product was produced from geospatial information prepared by

the USDA Forest Service. Source map scales vary and accuracy of

this product has not been assessed. Using GIS product for purposes

other than those for which they were created my yield inaccurate or

misleading results.

Disclaimer

Legend

Structure Type

Mature Closed Forest

Mature Forest with Gaps

Mid-Aged Forest

Young Forest

Open Lands

Administrative

Utility Corridor

Other Features

Water

Roads

1

2

3

4

5

Prepared by US Forest Service, Land Between The Lakes

GIS Laboratory, September 2004

Road Buffer

Mature Open Forest

Regenerating Forest
#### In the Matter of Ana Pena, Petitioner, v Jerry Mulligan et al., Respondents.

[820 NYS2d 809]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Westchester County Department of Planning, dated December 29, 2004, which, after a hearing, confirmed the termination of the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program *(see*42 USC § 1437f [b] [1]).

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, the determination is annulled, and the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program effective January 31, 2005.

In 200, the petitioner became a participant in Westchester County’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program *(see*42 USC § 1437f [b] [1]). On July 1, 2004, after three years of participation therein, the petitioner was notified that she was being terminated from that program. The Westchester County Department of Planning alleged, inter alia, that the petitioner had “failed to supply truthful and complete information and/or *953documentation required to determine [her] family income and composition,” and to “receive written approval from the Section 8 office” before adding her estranged husband to her household. The termination was precipitated by an anonymous-letter reporting that the petitioner’s estranged husband was residing with her. Following a hearing, a hearing officer upheld the termination based on the petitioner’s failure to provide her 2001 tax return.

The determination of a hearing officer must be supported by substantial evidence (see *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176 [1978]; *Matter of Hagood v Berger,*42 NY2d 901, 903 [1977]; *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222 [1974]; *Matter of Henny v Weinberg,*80 AD2d 831, 833 [1981]). Under the circumstances of this case, the evidence was not sufficient to establish that the petitioner’s estranged husband was residing with her or that she had failed to provide truthful financial information and/or documentation that was relevant to her termination from the program *(see Matter of Hagood v Berger, supra; Matter of Riggins v Lannert,*18 AD3d 560, 561 [2005]; *Matter of Floyd, v Hernandez-Pinero,*198 AD2d 135, 135-136 [1993]; *Matter of Henny v Weinberg, supra).*

The petitioner’s remaining contention need not be reached in light of our determination. Crane, J.P., Mastro, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.