alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TranS1 Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael Luetkemeyer
 22
#### Department of Welfare of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence Moran, Appellant.

Considering the length of time since the child’s birth (1940) with the consequent vagueness and uncertainty of the complainant’s testimony on several important points, it appears that the evidence falls far short of the requirement that it be clear, convincing and satisfactory. Order unanimously reversed, without costs and the complaint dismissed. Settle order. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Debra Hoopes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 29, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Debra Hoopes                                 
|                         |  |  |  | Debra Hoopes                                     
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer of Catcher Holdings, Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Catcher Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Catcher
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Angelo Tollis et al., Appellants, v. New York, Hew Haven *&*Hartford Railroad, Respondent.

Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order, on reargument, as denied their application to vacate a notice served by defendant for the examination of the plaintiffs before trial, and as denied their application for a direction therein that a discovery and inspection of defendant’s records and an examination before trial of defendant by plaintiffs, granted by such order, should precede the examination of plaintiffs by defendant. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Adel,

MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 958.]
### §14134. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXI, §210306, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2071, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1996 to 2000, was omitted as obsolete.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,925-01

EX P ARTE JOSE P H WEBE R, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D-1-D C-13-904090- A IN THE 331S T DIST RICT COURT

F ROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W

. 2 d 8 2 4 , 8 2 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of “super ” aggravated s exual assault of a child, one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child, and two counts of indece ncy with a child. He was sentenc ed to imprisonment for three terms of seventy year s and two terms of te n year s. Ap p l i cant contends that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appea l. We reman d ed t h i s application to the trial court for findings o f fa ct an d conclusions of law. The trial court made2

finding s and conc lusions and rec ommended that we grant re lief. We agree and conclude that trial counsel was ineffe ctive for failing to file a notice of appea l. Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369, 3 7 4 (T ex . C ri m . App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nts of conviction in cause number D-1-D C-13-904090-A from the 331st Dist ri ct C o u rt of Travis County

. Applicant is or dere d returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten day s of t h e issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be rep rese nted by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appe al in the trial cour t within 30 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion s h all be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: April 27, 2016 Do not publish
#### § 210.7-01 Application of §§ 210.7-01 to 210.7-05.

This article shall be applicable to financial statements filed for insurance companies.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3742 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3742

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Church 
   Street in Las Cruces, New Mexico, as the ``Edwin L. Mechem United 
                          States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2011

  Mr. Pearce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Church 
   Street in Las Cruces, New Mexico, as the ``Edwin L. Mechem United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Edwin L. Mechem was a land surveyor with the United 
        States Reclamation Service in Las Cruces, New Mexico, from 
        1932-1935.
            (2) He served as a member of the New Mexico State Police 
        Commission.
            (3) He was a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation.
            (4) He attended the New Mexico College of Agriculture and 
        Mechanic Arts, which later became the New Mexico State 
        University in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
            (5) He was admitted to the New Mexico bar in 1939, and 
        practiced law in Albuquerque and Las Cruces, New Mexico.
            (6) He served in the New Mexico House of Representatives 
        from 1947-1948.
            (7) He was the first New Mexico governor born in New Mexico 
        after statehood.
            (8) He served four terms as Governor of New Mexico between 
        1951 and 1962.
            (9) He served as a United States Senator from New Mexico 
        from 1962-1964.
            (10) He was confirmed by the United States Senate as an 
        United States District Judge for the District of New Mexico on 
        October 8, 1970, and served in that position until his death in 
        2002.
            (11) He led a rich and accomplished life dedicated to 
        public service which warrants recognition.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 100 North Church Street in 
Las Cruces, New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Edwin L. 
Mechem United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Edwin L. Mechem 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
### §10131. Findings and purposes

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) radioactive waste creates potential risks and requires safe and environmentally acceptable methods of disposal;

(2) a national problem has been created by the accumulation of (A) spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors; and (B) radioactive waste from (i) reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel; (ii) activities related to medical research, diagnosis, and treatment; and (iii) other sources;

(3) Federal efforts during the past 30 years to devise a permanent solution to the problems of civilian radioactive waste disposal have not been adequate;

(4) while the Federal Government has the responsibility to provide for the permanent disposal of high-level radioactive waste and such spent nuclear fuel as may be disposed of in order to protect the public health and safety and the environment, the costs of such disposal should be the responsibility of the generators and owners of such waste and spent fuel;

(5) the generators and owners of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel have the primary responsibility to provide for, and the responsibility to pay the costs of, the interim storage of such waste and spent fuel until such waste and spent fuel is accepted by the Secretary of Energy in accordance with the provisions of this chapter;

(6) State and public participation in the planning and development of repositories is essential in order to promote public confidence in the safety of disposal of such waste and spent fuel; and

(7) high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel have become major subjects of public concern, and appropriate precautions must be taken to ensure that such waste and spent fuel do not adversely affect the public health and safety and the environment for this or future generations.

(b) The purposes of this part are—

(1) to establish a schedule for the siting, construction, and operation of repositories that will provide a reasonable assurance that the public and the environment will be adequately protected from the hazards posed by high-level radioactive waste and such spent nuclear fuel as may be disposed of in a repository;

(2) to establish the Federal responsibility, and a definite Federal policy, for the disposal of such waste and spent fuel;

(3) to define the relationship between the Federal Government and the State governments with respect to the disposal of such waste and spent fuel; and

(4) to establish a Nuclear Waste Fund, composed of payments made by the generators and owners of such waste and spent fuel, that will ensure that the costs of carrying out activities relating to the disposal of such waste and spent fuel will be borne by the persons responsible for generating such waste and spent fuel.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title I, §111, Jan. 7, 1983, 96 Stat. 2207.)
### Part B—Health Care Improvement Research
### §1712. Record requirements

(a) Maintaining Records on Computer.—Each executive agency shall establish and maintain for 5 years a computer file, by fiscal year, containing unclassified records of all procurements greater than the simplified acquisition threshold in that fiscal year.

(b) Contents.—The record established under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each procurement carried out using—

(1) competitive procedures—

(A) the date of contract award;

(B) information identifying the source to whom the contract was awarded;

(C) the property or services the Federal Government obtains under the procurement; and

(D) the total cost of the procurement; or

(2) procedures other than competitive procedures—

(A) the information described in paragraph (1);

(B) the reason under section 3304(a) of this title or section 3204(a) of title 10 for using the procedures; and

(C) the identity of the organization or activity that conducted the procurement.

(c) Separate Record Category for Procurements Resulting in One Bid or Proposal.—Information included in a record pursuant to subsection (b)(1) that relates to procurements resulting in the submission of a bid or proposal by only one responsible source shall be separately categorized from the information relating to other procurements included in the record. The record of that information shall be designated "noncompetitive procurements using competitive procedures".

(d) Transmission and Data Entry of Information.—The head of each executive agency shall—

(1) ensure the accuracy of the information included in the record established and maintained by the agency under subsection (a); and

(2) transmit in a timely manner such information to the General Services Administration for entry into the Federal Procurement Data System referred to in section 1122(a)(4) of this title, or any successor system.

(Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3718; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVII, §1702(h)(5), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2158.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1712 | 41:417. | Pub. L. 93–400, §19, as added Pub. L. 98–369, title VII, §2732(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1197; Pub. L. 103–355, title IV, §4403, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3349; Pub. L. 110–417, title VIII, §874(b), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4558. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b)(2)(B). Pub. L. 117–81 substituted "section 3204(a)" for "section 2304(c)".
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION I Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave. 

### NORTH DAKOTA Bismarck, NO 58501-1947 DEPARTMENT

### oj HEALTH 701.328.5200 (fax) www.ndhealth.gov I August 17,2009

Ms. Callie Videtich (8P-AR) Director, AirProgram U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Re: April 2003 SiP Revision DearMs. Videtich: On April 17, 2003, the Department submitted reV1510ns to the North Dakota State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the control of air pollution. Within the summary ofproposed revisions (Section 2) it was indicated that NDAC 33-15-01-13.1.d was modified to include languageregardingminimization ofemissions duringmaintenance shutdownperiods. However, the copy ofNDAC 33-15-01 that was submitted did not contain any revisions to NDAC 33-15­ 01-13.l.d. It appears that the proposed change was not published by the North Dakota Legislative Council. The revision summary was in error and there was no proposed revision to NDAC 33-15-01-13.1.d ofthe SIP. If your staff has any questions, please feel free to contact Tom Bachman of my staff at (701) 328-5188. 

# ;:4od

TerryL. O'Clair, P.E. Director DivisionofAir Quality TLO/TB:saj xc: AmyPlatt, EPA Region 8

Environmental Health Division of Division of Division of Division of Section Chief's Office Air Quality Municipal Facilities Waste Management WaterQuality 701.328.5150 701.328.5188 701.328.5211 701.328.5166 701.328.5210 Printedon recycledpaper.
No: II-15-039 July 17, 2015

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417 

 Joey Ledford 404-997-4416 

 

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Readiness Inspection of Watts Bar Unit 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a meeting for July 27 to discuss the results 

of the operational readiness team inspection of Unit 2 at the Watts Bar nuclear plant.

That inspection, which concluded in June, will be the main focus of the discussion, but the NRC 

staff will also cover the status of construction activities, including major milestones and the path 

forward for the NRC decision on whether to issue an operating license for the unit.

The meeting is scheduled for 6 to 7:30 p.m. in the Comfort Inn at 2811 Decatur Pike in Athens, 

Tenn.

The meeting is open to the public and the NRC staff will be available to answer questions or 

provide additional information after the business portion of the meeting. A teleconference line will be 

available for people unable to attend. Anyone wishing to call into the meeting can contact the NRC’s 

Bob Haag at 404-997-4446 or Robert.haag@nrc.gov for that information.

The Watts Bar plant is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority and is located near 

Spring City, Tenn., about 60 miles southwest of Knoxville. 

TVA began work on the two units at the Watts Bar site in the 1970s. Watts Bar Unit 2 was 

suspended in 1985 with an active construction permit, and TVA restarted construction in 2007. 

If Watts Bar Unit 2 does meet all NRC requirements and receives an operating license, it will be 

the first nuclear plant to go into commercial operation in this country since Watts Bar Unit 1 in 1996.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-16-0129:  Status of the Decommissioning Program - 2016 Annual Report

Accession Number: ML16285A197

Date Released: Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16285A198 - SECY-16-0129: Status of the Decommissioning Program - 2016 Annual Report (5 page(s), 11/14/2016)
    - ML16285A207 - SECY-16-0129:  Enclosure 1 - Status of the Decommissioning Program - 2016 Annual Report (52 page(s), 11/14/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Josephine M. Fairchild, Plaintiff, v. Emma E. Reed, Appellant. Scarsdale Estates, Respondent, and Others, Defendants.

Order denying appellant’s motion to come in and defend affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. That denial was justified by appellant’s laches. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
•
 

SPA 12
 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 99
 

Amendments to Interim Status Standards
 

for Downgradient Ground-Water Monitoring Well Locations
 

56 FR 66365-66369
 

December 23, 1991
 

(RCRA Cluster II, Non-HSWA)
 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

ANALOGOUS EQUIV· MORE BROADER' 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION I STATE CITATION I ALENT I STRINGENT I IN SCOPE ' 

PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL WAC 173-303 

SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
 

t	 DEFINITIONS
 

"qualified ground­


water scientist" 260.10 040 x
 

PART 265 - INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF • HAZARDOUSWASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WAC 173-303 ' 

SUBPART F - GROUND-WATER MONITORING 

t	 GROUND-WATER MONITORING SYSTEM 

demonstrate alternate 

hydraulically downgradient monitoring 

well location will meet 

alternate criteria; 

in writing and kept at 

facility; certified by 

qualified ground-water 

scientist and establish: 265.91<a)(3) 400(3)(a) x 

existing physical 

obstacle prevents 

monitoring well 

installation at 

hydraulically 

downgradient limit 

of the waste 

• 

. management area 265.91 (a)(3)(i) 400(3)(a) x 

December 23, 1991 - Page 1 of 2 CL99.12· 1/29/92 IPmted:7/11/96) 
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 99: Amendments to Interim Status Standards 

for Downgradient Ground-Water Monitoring Well Locations (cont'dl 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

ANALOGOUS EQUN- MORE BROADER 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION STATE CITATION ! ALENT ! STRINGENT I IN SCOPE 

selected alternate 

downgradient location 

is as close to limit of 

waste management 

area as practical 

location ensures 

detection that, given 

alternate location, is 

as early as possible 

of any statistically 

significant amounts 

of hazardous waste 

or constituents 

that migrate from 

the waste 

management area 

to uppermost aquifer 

lateral expansion, 

new or replacement 

units not eligible for 

an alternate 

.downgradient 

location 

265.91 (aH3Hii) . 400(3Ha) x 

265.91 (aH3Hiii) 400(3)(a) x 

C~

265.91 (a)(3)(iv) 400(3)(a) x 

.(j
 

DecernberZd, 1991 --Page 2 of 2 CL99.12· 1/29/92 IPrintad:7/11/96)
5333.292 Appeals to the United States Court

of Federal Claims (COFC)

(a) The Department of Justice represents the Department of the Air Force in appeals brought before

the COFC. The Air Force Commercial Litigation Field Support Center (AF/JACQ) serves as the

Department of the Air Force counsel with the Department of Justice in such appeals.

(b) The contracting officer must notify the cognizant legal office and the SCO of any notice of appeal

to the COFC. The cognizant legal office must forward a copy of the notice to SAF/GCR and AF/JACQ.

(c) The contracting officer must assist the cognizant legal office in preparing the litigation report.

The contracting officer must obtain approval from the AF/JACQ trial attorney prior to releasing the

litigation report outside government.

Parent topic: Subpart 5333.2 – DISPUTES AND APPEALS
#### § 301.28 [Reserved]