alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.154 Motions. The requirements in this section apply to motions and related filings except where another rule expressly governs. ( a ) *Generally.* Unless made during a hearing or conference, a motion shall be in writing, shall state with particularity the grounds therefor, shall set forth the relief or order sought, and shall be accompanied by a written brief of the points and authorities relied upon. All written motions shall be served in accordance with § 201.150, be filed in accordance with § 201.151, meet the requirements of § 201.152, and be signed in accordance with § 201.153. The Commission or the hearing officer may order that an oral motion be submitted in writing. Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission or the hearing officer, if a motion is properly made to the Commission concerning a proceeding to which a hearing officer is assigned, the proceeding before the hearing officer shall continue pending the determination of the motion by the Commission. No oral argument shall be heard on any motion unless the Commission or the hearing officer otherwise directs.
( b ) *Opposing and reply briefs.* Briefs in opposition to a motion shall be filed within five days after service of the motion. Reply briefs shall be filed within three days after service of the opposition.
( c ) *Length limitation.* No motion (together with the brief in support of the motion), brief in opposition to the motion, or reply brief shall exceed 7,000 words, exclusive of any table of contents or table of authorities. The word limit shall not apply to any addendum that consists solely of copies of applicable cases, pertinent legislative provisions or rules, or relevant exhibits. Requests for leave to file motions and briefs in excess of 7,000 words are disfavored. A motion or brief, together with any accompanying brief, that does not exceed 15 pages in length, exclusive of pages containing the table of contents, table of authorities, and any addendum that consists solely of copies of applicable cases, pertinent legislative provisions, or rules and exhibits, but inclusive of pleadings incorporated by reference, is presumptively considered to contain no more than 7,000 words. Any motion or brief that exceeds these page limits must include a certificate by the attorney, or an unrepresented party, stating that the document complies with the length limitation set forth in this paragraph and stating the number of words in the document. The person preparing the certificate may rely on the word count of a word-processing program to prepare the document.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 13177, Mar. 19, 2004; 70 FR 72569, Dec. 5, 2005; 81 FR 50234, July 29, 2016]
#### § 10.4 Business address; hours.

The Office of Proceedings is located at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters. Faxes must be sent to (202) 418-5532, and emails must be sent to *PROC__filings@cftc.gov.* The office is open from 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except on federal holidays.

[78 FR 12934, Feb. 26, 2013, as amended at 89 FR 71807, Sept. 4, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Graeme  Scott,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/    Graeme Scott
-------------------
Graeme Scott
President, C.E.O., and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


May 12, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 391 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 391

                     For the relief of Emilio Maya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2011

 Mr. Hinchey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Emilio Maya.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EMILIO MAYA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Emilio Maya shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Emilio Maya enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Emilio Maya, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Emilio Maya 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §14043h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043h was editorially reclassified as section 21301 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 148.27 Decision.

The Presiding Officer shall issue an initial decision on the application in accordance with the provisions of § 10.84 of this chapter. The decision shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the Commission's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly or unreasonably protracted the adjudicatory proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. If the applicant has sought an award against more than one agency, the decision shall allocate responsibility for payment of any award made among the agencies, and shall explain the reasons for the allocation made.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3652 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3652

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal the authority to 
            make performance-based bonus payments to States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2011

Mr. DesJarlais introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal the authority to 
            make performance-based bonus payments to States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Needless Additional 
Performance Bonuses (SNAP) Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Repealer.--Section 16 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2025) is amended by striking subsection (d).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 16(c) of the Food and Nutrition 
Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2025(c)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (4) by striking ``, 
        or performance under the performance measures under subsection 
        (d)'', and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (5) by striking ``, 
        or performance under the performance measures under subsection 
        (d)''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.509 Challenge to classification by Commission employees.

Commission employees who have reasonable cause to believe that information is classified unnecessarily, improperly, or for an inappropriate period of time, may challenge those classification decisions through mandatory review or other appropriate procedures as established by the Oversight Committee. Commission employees who challenge classification decisions may request that their identity not be disclosed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1015

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-

00170.

-------------------------------

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

VIBRANT MEDIA, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1136

______________________ 
 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-

00172. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MICHAEL CASEY, Davidson Berquist Jackson & 

Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by JOHN SCOTT DAVIDSON, Arlington, VA.

 MATTHEW B. LOWRIE, Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, 

MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN M.

LITTMAN, CHRISTOPHER J. MCKENNA. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and CHEN,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
§ 204.7 Hearing. ( a ) A debtor will be provided a reasonable opportunity for an oral hearing by the Commission's designee when: ( 1 ) ( i ) By statute, consideration must be given to a request to waive the indebtedness;
( ii ) The debtor requests waiver of the indebtedness; and
( iii ) The waiver determination rests on an issue of credibility or veracity; or
( 2 ) The debtor requests reconsideration and the Commission's designee determines that the question of indebtedness cannot be resolved by reviewing the documentary evidence.
( b ) In cases where an oral hearing is provided to the debtor, the Commission's designee will conduct the hearing, and provide the debtor with a written decision 30 days after the hearing.
[58 FR 64370, Dec. 7, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54131, Oct. 26, 2001]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.312 [Reserved]
#### John B. DeVoney and Otto Price, Defendants in Error, v. Howard Cooper, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,216.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Landlord and tenant, § *73*
      ***
      *—what agreement does not modify lease.*In an action of forcible detainer, evidence that the lessor entere'd into an agreement with the lessee whereby the latter, in consideration of being deprived of part of his premises, was to occupy such premises without paying rent while certain alterations were being made was erroneuosly excluded, since such agreement was not a modification of the lease.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Court-net, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 5, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

• Action in forcible detainer by John B. DeVoney and Otto Price against Howard Cooper for the possession of a third floor flat leased to the defendant for a period of two years at a rental payable in monthly instalments of twenty dollars each. At the trial a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, a motion for new trial was denied and judgment was rendered on the verdict, whereupon defendant brought error.

Walter J. Miller and Walter L. Wenger, for plaintiff in error.

I. B. Perlman, for defendants in error; M. A. Milkewitch, of counsel.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §15065. Definition

In this part, the term "State" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and Guam.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §155, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1725.)
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

October 27, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M161027 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Brooke P. Clark, Director 

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION SESSION, 9:55 A.M., 

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2016, COMMISSIONERS' 

CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, 

ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

I. SECY-16-0060 – ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC, AND ENTERGY 

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. (VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION) 

(PETITION SEEKING REVIEW OF DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUND ISSUES) 

The Commission, with Commissioner Svinicki dissenting in part and Commissioner Baran 

dissenting in part, approved a Memorandum and Order addressing the petition filed by the State 

of Vermont, the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, and Green Mountain Power 

Corporation (together, Petitioners) seeking review of, and a discretionary hearing on, a number 

of issues associated with use of decommissioning trust funds at Vermont Yankee Nuclear 

Power Station. The Memorandum and Order directs the Staff to analyze the environmental 

effects of the exemption request and denies the Petitioners’ remaining requests for relief. 

(Subsequently, on October 27, 2016, the Secretary signed the Memorandum and Order.) 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 EDO 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCAA 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
## A GENDA EPA’s Outreach Meeting with Potential Small Entity Representatives Risk Management Plan Modernization Proposed Rule Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:30 am

– 12:00 pm Eastern time

9:30

- 10:00 am Introductions and Overview of SBAR Panel Process (Bill Nickerson, O ffice of P olicy , EPA )
10:00

- 11:45 am Overview of RMP Modernization ( Kim Jenkins, Office of Emergency Management, EPA) (Potential SERs can ask questions throughout presentation)

• Existing Program

• Relationship to other federal pro grams

• Proposed Provisions

• Cost estimates

11:45 am

- 12:00 pm Summary and Closing (Laura Free, OP, EPA)

Logistics
Teleconference dial

- in number : (866) 299

- 3188 Conference code: 202 566 2372 Dial the toll

- free teleconference number listed above. At the prompt, enter the conference code followed by the pound [#] sign. Note: You will hear music until the leader dials into the call. Adobe Connect: https://epa.connectsolutions.com/rmp_sbar/
Attending the meeting in person : This meeting will be held at EPA Headquarters in the William Jefferson Clinton North Building, Room 7530, at 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC. Any invited Small Entity Representative may attend in person if desired. We are unable to pay for travel expenses to Washington, DC for the meeting. If you would like to attend in person, you must RSVP with Laura Free at (202) 564

- 2653 or free.laura@epa.gov for directions and building access information. Materials :
1. “Pre

- Panel RMP O utreach FINAL 9

- 2

- 15 for SERs V8 ” PowerPoint presentation

– will be presented at th e meeting. Sent in email on 9/18

. 2. “PSM RMP Common Chemical List” Excel file

– provided as reference, questions are welcome. Sent in email on 9/10. 3. “EPA RMP 40cfr68.130 Chemical List” PDF

– provided as reference, questions are welcome. Sent in email on 9/10. 4. “OSHA PSM Appendix A Chemical list” PDF

- provided as reference, questions are welcome. Sent in email on 9/10.
Subpart 5317.1 — MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING                                                  **Parent topic:** Part 5317 - Special Contracting Methods5317.105-1 Uses       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i). Before entering into any multiyear contract, the contracting officer must review current statute and other Congressional language for potential restrictions.5317.106 Procedures       See the Multiyear Contracting Guide for general guidance on how to use multi-year contracting to acquire supplies and services.5317.106-3 Special Procedures Applicable to DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard       (f) *Annual and multiyear proposals.* See MP5301.601(a)(i).         (g) *Level unit prices.* See MP5301.601(a)(i).5317.170 General       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i).         (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).         (d)(4) The contracting officer must provide the congressional notification described in DFARS 217.170(d)(1), using the 1279 format in MP5305.303, to the cognizant HCA Workflow 40 days before the planned contract award date, with an information copy to SAF/FMBL, SAF/LLP, and the SCO. The cognizant HCA will notify the DoD offices listed in DFARS 217.170(d)(4). This congressional notification does not fulfill the requirement to announce contract awards in accordance with FAR 5.3, as supplemented.5317.171 Multiyear Contracts for Services       (c)  See MP5301.601(a)(i).5317.172 Multiyear Contracts for Supplies       (f)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i).         (g) See MP5301.601(a)(i). The contracting officer must provide the information supporting all requirements described in DFARS 217.172(g)(2) through the SCO to the cognizant HCA.         (h) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5317.173 Multiyear Contracts for Military Family Housing       See MP5301.601(a)(i).5317.174 Multiyear Contracts for Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-021 April 28, 3004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $12,000 FINE

FOR HIGH MOUNTAIN INSPECTION SERVICE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $12,000 against

High Mountain Inspection Service, Inc., of Mills, Wyoming, for violating NRC requirements.

In a letter to the company, Bruce S. Mallett, Administrator of the NRC’s Region IV

Office in Arlington, Texas, said that as a result of an NRC inspection and subsequent

investigation completed in January, the agency determined that the company violated NRC

security and training requirements for the possession and use of radioactive materials. The

violations involved the failure to maintain adequate security of a radiographic exposure device 

(used to x-ray welds), and failure to administer a written test to a newly hired individual prior to

using him as a radiographer’s assistant.

“The NRC acknowledges that there were no actual safety consequences as a result of

these violations,” Mr. Mallett said. However, he said, “each had the potential to impact the safe

use of radioactive materials.”

NRC staff met with company officials on February 18 to discuss the issues. The

company said it has taken corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

The NRC has classified the violations at Severity Level III, each carrying a $6,000 civil

penalty. The agency uses a four-level severity scale in which Severity Level I is the most serious. 

The company has 30 days to either pay the proposed civil penalty or challenge it.

The NRC’s letter, its enclosures, and the company’s response will be made available to

interested members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in accessing these documents is available

from the NRC Public Document Room at (301) 415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209.

###
Subpart 5323.3 — HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

IDENTIFICATION AND MATERIAL SAFETY

DATA

Parent topic: Part 5323 - Environment, Energy and Water Efficiency, Renewable Energy

Technologies, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace

5323.370-4 Procedures

(1) Preaward phase.

(i)(A)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
§ 1500.271 Bonds. ( a ) The bonds required under section 14(b) of the act may be executed by the owner or consignee on the appropriate form of a customs single-entry or term bond, containing a condition for the redelivery of the merchandise or any part thereof upon demand of the collector of customs and containing a provision for the performance of conditions as may legally be imposed for the relabeling or other action necessary to bring the hazardous substance into compliance with the act in such manner as is prescribed for such bond in the customs regulations in force on the date of request for authorization. The bond shall be filed with the collector of customs.
( b ) The collector of customs may cancel the liability for liquidated damages incurred under the above-mentioned provisions of such a bond, if he receives an application for relief therefrom, upon the payment of a lesser amount or upon such other terms and conditions as shall be deemed appropriate under the law and in view of the circumstances, but the collector shall not act under this regulation in any case unless the area office director is in full agreement with the action.