alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3593 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3593

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ``National 
  Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 
               Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 
              AGENCY NCS OFFICER GREGG DAVID WENZEL MEMORIAL POST 
              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``National Clandestine Service of the Central 
Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 
Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3593

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ``National 
  Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 
               Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.
```
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Arthur J. Funder, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-342;

Second District

August 6, 1974.

*352David E. Braun, of Elmhurst, for appellánt.

John J. Bowman, State’s Attorney, of Wheaton (Malcolm F. Smith, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-6-2007

USA v. Poellnitz

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket

No. 06-3027

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Poellnitz" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 133.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/133
This opinion has been removed from the repository at 

the request of a party to the case.
### SUBCHAPTER I–A—ENFORCEMENT OF VOTING RIGHTS
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 70289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26667]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION

Commission Meeting

November 30, 2004.
AGENCY: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, 
December 9, 2004, and Friday, December 10, 2004, at the Ronald Reagan 
Building, International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting is tentatively scheduled to begin at 10 
a.m. on December 9, and at 8:30 a.m. on December 10.
    Topics for discussion include findings on a congressionally 
mandated study on specialty hospitals; pay for performance for 
hospitals, physicians, and home health; and incentives for health care 
information technology adoption. In addition, the Commission will 
discuss payment adequacy for hospitals, physicians, skilled nursing 
facilities, home health, and dialysis. Other topics will include 
imaging, measuring physician resource use, and other changes to 
physician payment.
    Agendas will be e-mailed approximately one week prior to the 
meeting. The final agenda will be available on the Commission's Web 
site (http://www.MedPAC.gov).

ADDRESSES: MedPAC's address is: 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, 
Washington, DC 20001. The telephone number is (202) 220-3700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Ellison, Office Manager, (202) 
220-3700.

Mark E. Miller,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 04-26667 Filed 12-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
```
#### § 503.1 Interpretations.

The regulations in parts 500, 501, and 502 of this chapter are necessarily general in application and requests for formal rulings, statements of policy or interpretations shall be addressed to the Secretary of the Commission for consideration. Statements of policy or interpretations binding on the Commission will be published in the Federal Register. However, technical questions not involving policy consideration may be answered by the staff.

[36 FR 23058, Dec. 3, 1971]
### §14192. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXVII, §270002, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2089, which related to the National Commission on Crime Control and Prevention, was omitted as obsolete.
### SUBCHAPTER I—DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND STANDARDS
No: II-16-029 May 3, 2016

CONTACT: Roger Hannah 404-997-4417

Joey Ledford 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss 2015 Performance at Brunswick Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Tuesday, May 10,

to discuss the agency’s assessment of the Brunswick nuclear plant during 2015.

The plant, operated by Duke Energy, is located near Southport, N.C., about 30 miles south of 

Wilmington.

The open house, which will include informational posters, is scheduled from 5 - 6 p.m. in the 

Duke Media Center, 8520 River Road SE in Southport.

NRC resident inspectors and other staff members will be available to answer questions on the

safety performance and regulatory oversight of the Brunswick plant, as well as highlights of NRC

inspections. 

“We invite the public to visit with us and find out what we’re doing to ensure Brunswick and 

other nuclear plants are operated safely,” said NRC Region II Administrator Cathy Haney. “These 

annual meetings offer an opportunity for everyone, and especially people who live near the plant, to 

learn about our inspection and oversight programs.”

The NRC’s annual assessment letter to plant officials addressing 2015 Brunswick plant 

performance will serve as the main focus of the open house, but NRC staff members will be available 

to answer other questions about the NRC’s role at the plant. 

The NRC review of the Brunswick plant for 2015 concluded that plant operations preserved 

public health and safety and protected the environment. Because of that performance, it will continue to 

receive the detailed routine or baseline inspections this year that all nuclear power plants receive.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with green, which has very low safety significance, and then progress to 

white, yellow or red, based on the significance of the issues. All inspection findings and performance 

indicators for Brunswick were green in 2015.

Current performance information for Brunswick Unit 1 and Unit 2, as well as more detailed 

information about NRC inspection and oversight, is available at www.nrc.gov. Specific plant 

performance indicators and inspection reports are updated at least quarterly.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION




Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Horne
International, Inc. (“Horne”), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
the quarterly report of Horne on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
26, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of Horne.





Date:
      November 8, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Darryl
      K. HorneDarryl
      K. HornePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      November 8, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Paige
      E. SHANNONPAIGE
      E. SHANNONInterim
      Chief Financial Officer





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been
provided to Horne and will be retained by Horne and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02-1710-CR-2574 | March 27, 2018 Page 1 of 2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), 

this Memorandum Decision shall not be 

regarded as precedent or cited before any 

court except for the purpose of establishing 

the defense of res judicata, collateral 

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

Chad A. Montgomery

Montgomery Law Office

Lafayette, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Curtis T. Hill, Jr.

Attorney General

Matthew B. Mackenzie

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana

I N T H E

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Bobby Ray Rufus McDonald,

Appellant-Defendant,

v.

State of Indiana,

Appellee-Plaintiff

March 27, 2018

Court of Appeals Case No.

79A02-1710-CR-2574

Appeal from the Tippecanoe 

Superior Court

The Honorable Randy J. Williams, 

Judge

Trial Court Cause No. 

79D01-1603-F5-33 

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

[1] After stabbing his nephew in the leg during a night of drinking and smoking 

spice, Bobby McDonald was convicted of battery with a deadly weapon, a 

Level 5 felony, and sentenced to the maximum term of six years (to include two 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 79A02-1710-CR-2574 | March 27, 2018 Page 2 of 2

years with Tippecanoe County Community Corrections). He asks us to reduce 

his sentence pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B), which authorizes us to 

revise a sentence if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, we find 

that the sentence is “inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the 

character of the offender.” We decline to exercise that authority in this case. 

[2] McDonald notes the principle that “the maximum sentence should be reserved 

for the very worst offender,” Appellant’s Br. p. 13, and argues that he does not 

fall into that class, focusing primarily on his history of mental-health issues

(e.g., ADHD, PTSD, and bipolar disorder). While we join the trial court in 

acknowledging McDonald’s mental-health problems, his lengthy criminal 

record places him comfortably in the worst-offender category. The pre-sentence 

investigation report—which McDonald does not contest—reveals five felony 

convictions, twenty-two misdemeanor convictions (including six for battery), a 

habitual-substance-offender finding, and at least eight probation violations. In 

addition, while this case was pending, McDonald committed and pled guilty to 

Class A misdemeanor domestic battery. 

[3] The purpose of 7(B) review is to “leaven the outliers.” Cardwell v. State, 895 

N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008). In light of McDonald’s criminal history, and 

his commission of yet another battery while out on bond in this case, the sixyear, maximum sentence for Level 5 felony battery is by no means an outlier.

[4] Affirmed.

Barnes, J., and Pyle, J. concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
#### Elias S. Ward, Respondent, v. Kestro Chandra Sen, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Approval 

NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION 

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION 

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting: 

Wednesday, March 2, 2016 

3:00 PM Discussion of Management and Personnel Issues (Closed - Ex.2 and 6) 

The Commission voted 4 to O on February 17, 2016, to close this discussion on internal personnel 

practices and personal information as public disclosure of which would not protect personal privacy or 

be in the public interest. 

Attendance 

Commissioners 

EDO 

Contact Person for More Information 

Denise McGovern, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0681) 

Denise McGovern 

Office of the Secretary 

February 24, 2016
Order filed December 4, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00926

- CV NO. 14

- 15

- 00927

- CV

____________ In the Matter of T.H.

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 2015

- 02522J & 2015

- 02523J

ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a n order waiving jurisdiction over a juvenile defendant. Appellant's brief was due December 3, 2015

. No brief has
been filed. Appeals in juvenile certification cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. This accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel William M. Thursland , to file appellant’s brief no later than December 1 5 , 2015. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held incontempt of court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel

due to the failure to timely file appellant’s brief.

PER CURIAM
### §14043h–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043h–5 was editorially reclassified as section 21306 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §13574. Air quality enhancement program

#### (a) Eligible projects

Projects supported under section 13572(a)(2) of this title shall—

(1) utilize technologies that meet relevant Federal and State clean air requirements applicable to the unit or facility, including being adequately demonstrated for purposes of section 7411 of this title, achievable for purposes of section 7479 of this title, or achievable in practice for purposes of section 7501 of this title; or

(2) utilize equipment or processes that exceed relevant Federal or State clean air requirements applicable to the unit or facilities included in the projects by achieving greater efficiency or environmental performance.

#### (b) Priority in project selection

In making an award under section 13572(a)(2) of this title, the Secretary shall give priority to—

(1) projects whose installation is likely to result in significant air quality improvements in nonattainment air quality areas or substantially reduce the emission level of criteria pollutants and mercury air emissions;

(2) projects for pollution control that result in the mitigation or collection of more than 1 pollutant; and

(3) projects designed to allow the use of the waste byproducts or other byproducts of the equipment.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 13572(a)(2) of this title—

(1) $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;

(2) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(3) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(4) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; and

(5) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2011.

#### (d) Applicability

No technology, or level of emission reduction under subsection (a)(2) shall be treated as adequately demonstrated for purpose of Section 1 7411 of this title, achievable for purposes of section 7479 of this title, or achievable in practice for purposes of section 7501 of this title solely by reason of the use of such technology, or the achievement of such emission reduction, by one or more facilities receiving assistance under section 13572(a)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXXI, §3104, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §421(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 759.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "purposes of section".
BA # 3253
December 19, 2016 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the November 2016 monthly status 

report on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated 

carryover funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC 

activities in November 2016 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit in the case In re Aiken County regarding the licensing process for the U.S. 

Department of Energy’s Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Pete Olson 

Vice Chairman, Subcommittee on 

 Energy and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
5305.502 Authority

(a) Newspapers. See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5305.5 - PAID ADVERTISEMENTS
#### George C. Van Tuyl, Jr., as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Appellant, v. David A. Sullivan and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Elizabeth R. Putney (Deceased), Stephen M. Randall and Another, Respondents.

Order in so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to bring in the said respondents by supplemental summons and complaint, as defendants in the action, granted, upon the ground that as to the respondents the six years’ limitation imposed by section 120 of chapter 369 of the Laws of 1914* was in effect and applicable when the motion was made, and that such limitation began to run only after the expiration of the thirty-day period provided by section 80 of that act,* upon the authority of *Hulbert*v. *Clark*(128 N. Y. 295, 297); *Sackheim*v. *Pigueron*(215 id. 62, 73); *Handy*v. *Draper*(89 id. 334). (See, also, *Van Tuyl*v. *Schwab,*172 App. Div. 670, 674.) Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

*

 Banking Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 2; Laws of 1914, chap. 369), § 120; Id. §80.—[Rep.
MP5325.7002-2 - Exceptions       **2019 Edition**                                       MP5325.7002-2-1. Domestic Non-Availability Determinations (DNAD) Under DFARS 225.7002                                          MP5325.7002-2-2. DNAD Exception    **MP5325.7002-2-1. Domestic Non-Availability Determinations (DNAD) Under DFARS 225.7002****MP5325.7002-2-2. DNAD Exception****Parent topic:** MP5325.70 — AUTHORIZATION ACTS, APPROPRIATIONS ACTS, AND OTHER STATUTORY RESTRICTIONS ON FOREIGN ACQUISITION
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Willie Sid DuPree, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-78;

Second District

August 19,1974.

Daniel T. Williams, Jr., of Rockford, for appellant.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.

*477Philip G. Reinhard, State’s Attorney, of Rockford (James W. Jerz and Edward Monis, both of Model District State’s Attorneys Office, of counsel), for the People.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# VR-SECY-15-0010:  Final Procedures for Hearings on Conformance with the Acceptance Criteria in Combined Licenses.

Accession Number: ML16095A104

Date Released: Friday, April 1, 2016

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML16095A106 - VR-SECY-15-0010:  Final Procedures for Hearings on Conformance with the Acceptance Criteria in Combined Licenses - Chairman Burns. (109 page(s), 4/1/2016)
    - ML16095A107 - VR-SECY-15-0010:  Final Procedures for Hearings on Conformance with the Acceptance Criteria in Combined Licenses - Commissioner Svinicki Part 1 of 2. (154 page(s), 4/1/2016)
    - ML16095A108 - VR-SECY-15-0010:  Final Procedures for Hearings on Conformance with the Acceptance Criteria in Combined Licenses - Commissioner Svinicki Part 2 of 2. (84 page(s), 4/1/2016)
    - ML16096A126 - VR-SECY-15-0010: Final Procedures for Hearings on Conformance with the Acceptance Criteria in Combined Licenses - Commissioner Ostendorff and Commissioner Baran. (17 page(s), 4/1/2016)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer