alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §15973. Western integrated coal gasification demonstration project

#### (a) In general

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall carry out a project to demonstrate production of energy from coal mined in the western United States using integrated gasification combined cycle technology (referred to in this section as the "demonstration project").

#### (b) Components

The demonstration project—

(1) may include repowering of existing facilities;

(2) shall be designed to demonstrate the ability to use coal with an energy content of not more than 9,000 Btu/lb.; and

(3) shall be capable of removing and sequestering carbon dioxide emissions.

#### (c) All types of western coals

Notwithstanding the foregoing, and to the extent economically feasible, the demonstration project shall also be designed to demonstrate the ability to use a variety of types of coal (including subbituminous and bituminous coal with an energy content of up to 13,000 Btu/lb.) mined in the western United States.

#### (d) Location

The demonstration project shall be located in a western State at an altitude of greater than 4,000 feet above sea level.

#### (e) Cost sharing

The Federal share of the cost of the demonstration project shall be determined in accordance with section 16352 of this title.

#### (f) Loan guarantees

Notwithstanding subchapter XIII, the demonstration project shall not be eligible for Federal loan guarantees.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IV, §413, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 755.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapter XIII, referred to in subsec. (f), was in the original "title XIV", meaning title XIV of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1061, which enacted subchapter XIII of this chapter and section 13557 of this title. For complete classification of title XIV to the Code, see Tables.
No: III-16-001 January 20, 2016

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Monticello Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Donald Krause as the 

new resident inspector at the Monticello nuclear power plant in Monticello, Minn., 

approximately 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis. The nuclear power facility is 

operated by Northern States Power Co.-Minnesota.

“Donald Krause’s experience, training and commitment to safety will help 

the NRC fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by ensuring 

the Monticello plant meets the high standards set by the NRC,” said Region III 

Administrator Cynthia D. Pederson.

Krause joined the NRC Region III office in 2014 as a reactor engineer. Before joining the NRC, 

he was a radiation safety officer for a General Electric Hitachi site and previously held two senior 

reactor operating licenses from the NRC. Krause has also served six years in the U.S. Navy and is a 

graduate of the U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Program. He has a master’s of engineering degree from the 

University of Virginia and a bachelor’s of science degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State 

University.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. Krause joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector 

Paul Zurawski at the Monticello facility. The NRC resident inspectors can be reached at 763-295-2066.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Wayne A. Pratt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Syntax-Brillian Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, and its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:February 14, 2007              /s/ Wayne A. Pratt   Wayne A. Pratt   Chief Financial Officer
### §15303. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15303 was editorially reclassified as section 20903 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Bednarek, Respondent, against International Milling Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.
### Part A—Establishment of Qualified Health Plans
#### § 2011.101 General.

This subpart sets forth the terms and conditions under which certificates of quota eligibility will be issued to foreign countries that have been allocated a share of the U.S. sugar tariff-rate quota. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, sugar imported from a foreign country may not be entered unless such sugar is accompanied by a certificate of quota eligibility. This subpart applies only to the ability to enter sugar at the in-quota tariff rates of the quota (subheadings 1701.11.10, 1701.12.10, 1701.91.10, 1701.99.10, 1702.90.10, and 2106.90.44 of the HTS). Nothing in this subpart shall affect the ability to enter articles at the over-quota tariff rate (subheadings 1701.11.50, 1701.12.50, 1701.91.30, 1701.99.50, 1702.90.20, 2106.90.46).

[61 FR 26784, May 29, 1996]
#### § 1500.104 Agents.

The Secretary may appoint agent(s) to conduct the referendum. Agent(s) may appoint any individual or individuals necessary or desirable to assist the agent in performing such agent's functions under this subpart. The agent authorizes each individual so appointed to perform any or all of the functions which, in the absence of such appointment, shall be performed by the agent.
§ 703.8 Openness of records and proceedings. ( a ) The statistical summaries specified in § 703.6(e) of this part shall be available to any person for inspection and copying.
( b ) Except as provided under paragraphs (a) and (e) of this section, and paragraph (c) of § 703.7 of this part, all records of the Mechanism may be kept confidential, or made available only on such terms and conditions, or in such form, as the Mechanism shall permit.
( c ) The policy of the Mechanism with respect to records made available at the Mechanism's option shall be set out in the procedures under § 703.5(a) of this part; the policy shall be applied uniformly to all requests for access to or copies of such records.
( d ) Meetings of the members to hear and decide disputes shall be open to observers on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms. The identity of the parties and products involved in disputes need not be disclosed at meetings.
( e ) Upon request the Mechanism shall provide to either party to a dispute: ( 1 ) Access to all records relating to the dispute; and
( 2 ) Copies of any records relating to the dispute, at reasonable cost.
( f ) The Mechanism shall make available to any person upon request, information relating to the qualifications of Mechanism staff and members.
Editorial Note on Part 140
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 140 appear at 89 FR 71813, Sept. 4, 2024.

§ 140.74 Delegation of authority to issue special calls for Series 03 Reports. ( a ) The Commodity Futures Trading Commission hereby delegates, until such time as the Commission orders otherwise, to the Director of the Division of Enforcement, or such other employee or employees as the Director may designate from time to time, the authority to issue special calls for series 03 reports under § 18.00 of this chapter.
( b ) The Director of the Division of Enforcement may submit any matter which has been delegated to the Director under this section to the Commission for its consideration.
( c ) Nothing in this section may prohibit the Commission, at its election, from exercising the authority delegated to the Director of the Division of Enforcement under paragraph (a) of this section.
[82 FR 28770, June 26, 2017]
#### Annie Page Ward, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company and Others, Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
El Departamento de Agricultura de los 

EE.UU. 

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU.

¡Ayude a mantener a Estados Unidos 

libre de esta enfermedad mortal!

¿Necesita más información? www.aphis.usda.gov

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU. 

es un proveedor, empleador y prestador que ofrece igualdad de oportunidades.

Servicio de Inspección de Sanidad de Plantas y Animales

Programa de asistencia número 2237-3S • Emitido en marzo de 2019

El Departamento de Agricultura de los EE.UU.

 INFORME SOBRE 

LOS CERDOS ENFERMOS

1-866-536-7593

PESTE PORCINA AFRICANA

La peste porcina africana 

(PPA o ASF por sus siglas en 

inglés) es una enfermedad 

viral que afecta a los cerdos 

domésticos y salvajes. Se 

propaga fácilmente y mata 

a la mayoría de los cerdos 

que la contraen. Nunca se 

encontraron casos de PPA 

en Estados Unidos. 

Las personas no pueden 

contraer PPA, pero pueden 

acarrearla en la ropa, 

los zapatos y los equipos. 

Un brote en los Estados 

Unidos tendría efectos 

económicos devastadores 

para la industria porcina.

No lo traiga a casa

LOS VIAJEROS INTERNACIONALES 

pueden acarrear esta enfermedad dentro 

de los Estados Unidos sin saberlo. 

Siga estos pasos para 

ayudar a mantener 

seguros a los cerdos 

de EE. UU.:

COMPRENDA EL RIESGO

TOME PRECAUCIONES ADICIONALES 

CUANDO VISITE GRANJAS EXTRANJERAS

DECLARE LOS ARTÍCULOS 

Y LAS VISITAS A GRANJAS

l La PPA puede acarrearse en la ropa, los zapatos y las manos.

l También puede sobrevivir durante meses en los productos porcinos.

l Traiga solo artículos alimentarios y souvenirs seguros.

Consulte www.aphis.usda.gov/travelers

para saber qué artículos pueden ingresar en los Estados Unidos. 

l Declare cualquier visita a una granja extranjera en la Aduana 

de los EE. UU. cuando vuelva a ingresar al país. 

l Si visita una granja fuera de los Estados Unidos, siga los protocolos 

de bioseguridad de esta durante la visita. 

l Utilice calzado y cobertores o ropa específicos del sitio y deseche el 

equipo de protección antes de abandonar la granja. Si no le ofrecen 

un equipo, lave y desinfecte los zapatos y la ropa, o bien deséchelos, 

antes de regresar a los Estados Unidos.

l Cuando regrese a los Estados Unidos, no ingrese a una granja u otro 

lugar donde haya cerdos (incluidos los mercados ganaderos, los 

zoológicos, los circos y las tiendas de mascotas que vendan cerdos 

vietnamitas) durante, al menos, cinco días.
### §10508. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 10508 was editorially reclassified as section 50108 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOHN DAVID M ITC HELL, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. U.S. DEPAR T M ENT OF THE AIR FOR C E , JOINT B A SE ELM ENDOR

F/RIC HARDSON, 732 AIR M OB ILITY SQUADR ON, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-35322 D.C . No. 3:10-c v-0263-TM B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ala ska Tim othy M . B urge ss, Distric t Judge , Pre siding A rgue d a nd Subm itte d

August 14, 2013 Anc hora ge , Ala ska B e fore : KOZINSKI, C hie f Judge , B ER ZON, a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. The re c ord re ve a ls suffic ie nt e vide nc e to support the distric t c ourt’ s c onc lusion tha

t an a uthoriz e d e m

ploy e e or offic e r a

p pointe d M itc h e ll to his position a nd tha t he pe rform e d a

fe de ra l func tion in the

c ourse of his e m

ploy m e nt 

# FIL ED SEP 11 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.with thegove rnm e nt. S e e5 U.S.C . § 2105(a). The form use d to m e m oria liz e M itc he ll’ s e m

ploy m e nt re fe re nc e s his a

ppointe e sta

tus m ultipletim e s, a

n d a n a uthoriz e d de signe e of the Se c re ta ry of the Air Forc e a

ppointe d M itc he ll to his position. 5 U.S.C . § 2105(a)(1)(C )–(D); se e5 U.S.C . § 302(b)(1) (“ [T] he he a d of an a g e n c y m ay de l e gate to subordina te offic ia ls thea

uthority . . . to ta ke fina l a c tion on matte rs pe rta ining to the e m ploy m e nt, dire c tion, a

nd ge ne ra l a dm inistra

tion of pe rsonne l unde r his a ge n c y .” ). This c onform s with the sta tutory re quire m e nts for a

ppointm e nt. 5 U.S.C . § 2105(a)(1)(C )–(D). Fina l ly , his work a s an Air Forc e e m

ploy e e ha ndling c argo at a

m i lita ry ba s e is a fe de ra l func tion unde r 5 U.S.C . § 2105(a)(2). AFFIRM E D .

2
### §§11449, 11450. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(a)(5), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 11449, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §739, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 531; Pub. L. 100–628, title VII, §703(b), (c), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3246; Pub. L. 101–165, title IX, §9119(a), Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1157; Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §621(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4744; Pub. L. 102–590, §11(b)(1), Nov. 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 5141; Pub. L. 103–239, title VII, §701(a), May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 605, authorized appropriations.

Section 11450, Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §741, July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 101–645, title VI, §621(c), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4744; Pub. L. 102–590, §11(b)(2), Nov. 10, 1992, 106 Stat. 5141; Pub. L. 103–239, title VII, §701(b), May 4, 1994, 108 Stat. 606; Pub. L. 104–110, title I, §102(d)(2), Feb. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 105–114, title II, §203(c)(2), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2288, provided for termination of this part on Dec. 31, 1999.
§ 24.0 Scope and purpose of guides. ( a ) The Guides in this part apply to the manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, or advertising of all kinds or types of leather or simulated-leather trunks, suitcases, traveling bags, sample cases, instrument cases, brief cases, ring binders, billfolds, wallets, key cases, coin purses, card cases, French purses, dressing cases, stud boxes, tie cases, jewel boxes, travel kits, gadget bags, camera bags, ladies' handbags, shoulder bags, purses, pocketbooks, footwear, belts (when not sold as part of a garment) and similar articles (hereinafter, “industry products”).
( b ) These Guides represent administrative interpretations of laws administered by the Federal Trade Commission for the guidance of the public in conducting its affairs in conformity with legal requirements. These Guides specifically address the application of section 5 of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, and advertising of industry products listed in paragraph (a) of this section. They provide the basis for voluntary compliance with such laws by members of industry. Conduct inconsistent with the positions articulated in these Guides may result in corrective action by the Commission under section 5 if, after investigation, the Commission has reason to believe that the behavior falls within the scope of conduct declared unlawful by the statute.
#### §§ 210.14-01-02 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 21912, Mar. 28, 2024.

###### Cross Reference

Link to a delay published at 89 FR 25804, Apr. 12, 2024.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1066** 

SOLOMON ASEFFA DEGU , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 17, 2014 Decided: September 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition d enied in part and dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.
Workneh Churnet, LAW OFFICE OF WORKNEH CHURNET, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Samuel P. Go, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation , U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Solomon Aseffa Degu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigrati on Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the record
eviden ce does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (20 12 ), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.
See INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in part. With regard to the procedural due process claims raised by Degu, we

note that such claims were reviewable by the Board. Because Degu failed to properly exhaust the claims before the Board prior to raising them before this cou rt, we lack jurisdiction to
review them. * See Farrokhi v. INS , 900 F.2 d 697, 700

- 01 (4th Cir. 1990). We therefore deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the

* Degu claims that he was unable to exhaust these claims on account of ineffective assistance of counsel. To raise such a claim, however, Degu must file a motion to reopen with the Board pursuant to Matter of Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (B

. I
. A
. 1988).3 facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
#### In the Matter of Steven Garofolo, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[818 NYS2d 923]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits harassment of an employee. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and *619all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and no longer is aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Valentine v Goord,*19 AD 3d 909 [2005]).

Crew III, J.P., Feters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30905

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DENAUD EGANA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-53-ALL-G

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Denaud Egana was convicted for possessing and passing

counterfeit obligations has appealed the sentence imposed by the

district court. Egana contends that the district court erred in

increasing his offense level for obstruction of justice. The

district court’s determination that a defendant has obstructed

justice is reviewed for clear error. United States v. Bethley,

973 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1992). 

The district court is required to increase a defendant’s 
No. 98-30905

-2-

offense level by two levels “if the defendant willfully

obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the

administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution,

or sentencing of the instant offense.” U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. 

Although some of Egana’s actions which form the basis for the

district court’s ruling arguably were contemporaneous with his

arrest, see § 3C1.1, comment. (n.3(d)), we hold that the district

court did not clearly err in concluding that Egana’s other

actions constituted obstruction of justice. See Bethley, 973

F.2d at 402. The judgment is

AFFIRMED.
### §16941. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 16941 was editorially reclassified as section 20941 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.