alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1101.11 General application of provisions of section 6(b)(1). ( a ) *Information subject to section 6(b)(1).* To be subject to the notice and analysis provisions of section 6(b)(1), information must meet all the following criteria: ( 1 ) The information must pertain to a specific product which is either designated or described in a manner which permits its identity to be ascertained readily by the public.
( 2 ) The information must be obtained, generated or received by the Commission as an entity or by individual members, employees, agents, contractors or representatives of the Commission acting in their official capacities.
( 3 ) The Commission or its members, employees, agents or representatives must propose to disclose the information to the public (see § 1101.12).
( 4 ) The manner in which the product is designated or described in the information must permit the public to ascertain readily the identity of the manufacturer or private labeler. [See § 1101.13.]
( b ) *Information not subject to section 6(b)(1).* The requirements of section 6(b)(1) do not apply to: ( 1 ) Information described in the exclusions contained in section 6(b)(4) of the CPSA (see subpart E of this rule).
( 2 ) Information the Commission is required by law to make publicly available. This information includes, for example, Commission notifications to foreign governments regarding certain products to be exported, as required by section 18(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(b); section 14(d) of the FHSA, 15 U.S.C. 1273(d); and section 15(c) of the FFA, 15 U.S.C. 1202(c). (See the Commission's Export Policy Statement, 16 CFR part 1017.)
( 3 ) Information required to be disclosed to the President and Congress pursuant to section 27(j) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2076(j).
( 4 ) Press releases issued by firms.
( 5 ) Information filed or presented in administrative proceedings or litigation to which the Commission is a party and which is not expressly subject to the section 6(b)(4) exceptions.
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

CONTACT: Breck Henderson (817) 860-8128

RIV: 96-61

November 22, 1996

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS FORT ST. VRAIN FINAL RADIATION SURVEY RESULTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting next week to review the results of the final radiation survey, one of the last steps in

decommissioning Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 3, in the Platteville Community Center, 508 Reynolds Ave., Platteville, Colorado. Copies of NRC

reports of its inspection of final survey techniques and the NRC's independent measurement of residual radiation levels will be available at the meeting.

A final radiation survey is a careful, systematic check of the former nuclear power plant site with sensitive radiation measuring instruments to verify that

cleanup has been properly completed. The next step in the decommissioning of Fort St. Vrain will be a request by Public Service Company of Colorado,

the plant's owner, to terminate the license. This step, expected to be taken in early 1997, will conclude the decommissioning process begun in 1990.
Subpart 5333.1 – PROTESTS                                   **Parent topic:** Part 5333 - Protests, Disputes, and Appeals5333.102 General       (a) The contracting officer must inform the SSA prior to rendering a decision to take corrective action or to settle a protest in any other manner before submitting its recommendation to the GAO, courts, or the arbitrator.         (b)(3)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5333.103  Protests to the Agency       (d)(4) When an agency protest is denied, an offeror may request an independent review by the SCO.         (h) The contracting officer must prepare the protest file following an agency protest (including a protest of a non-appropriated funds procurement) regardless of the level at which the protest is filed. The contracting officer must request guidance from the cognizant HCA for any protest likely to generate significant Congressional interest. The decision to deny a protest must be made at a level no lower than that at which the protest was filed. Protests may be sustained at any level in the review process, with the concurrence of the cognizant legal office.5333.104 Protests to GAO       (a) The Air Force Commercial Litigation Field Support Center (AF/JACQ) serves as agency counsel before the GAO and defends Department of the Air Force interests (see MP5333.104)**.**         (b) *Protests before award*         (1) Forward the determination and finding through the SCO to AF/JACQ and, for approval, to the cognizant HCA workflow within seven days of the protest notification (see MP5301.601(a)(i)).         (c) *Protests after award*         (2) Forward the determination and finding through the SCO to AF/JACQ and, for approval, to the cognizant HCA workflow within seven days of the protest notification (see MP5301.601(a)(i)).         (g) *Notice to GAO*         Forward the report through the SCO to AF/JACQ and to the cognizant HCA for signature and submission to GAO within fifty-five days of date of receipt of the GAO recommendations (see MP5301.601(a)(i)). Provide a copy of the report submission to the SAF/AQC Workflow.5333.105  Protests to the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC)       The Air Force Commercial Litigation Field Support Center (AF/JACQ) serves as the Department of the Air Force agency counsel to the Department of Justice (DoJ) for protests at the COFC and assists the assigned DoJ attorney in defending Air Force interests. The contracting officer must inform AF/JACQ of any notice of protest at the COFC and provide support as requested by AF/JACQ. The contracting officer must also notify the SCO and its supporting legal office/local attorney who provides contract law advice.5333.170  Briefing Requirement for Protested Acquisitions Valued at $1B or More       Within seven (7) days of the filing of the protest, forward the briefing slide deck through the SCO and cognizant HCA to AF/JACQ and the SAF/AQC Workflow for DAS(C) review and processing to OUSD(A&S)/DPC.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Arends, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marchex, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |        |  |                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL A.
ARENDS
|                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Michael A. Arends       
|                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER X—DEVELOPMENT SITES FOR ISOLATED DEFENSE INSTALLATIONS

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Expiration Date

For expiration of authority of Housing and Home Administrator to act under this subchapter, see section 1591c of this title.
#### § 314.6 Exceptions.

Section 314.4(b)(1), (d)(2), (h), and (i) do not apply to financial institutions that maintain customer information concerning fewer than five thousand consumers.

[86 FR 70308, Dec. 9, 2021]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, Lisa
VanPatten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


       Dated: January 16, 2007               /s/ Lisa VanPatten
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lisa VanPatten
                                           Chief Financial Officer
#### James C. McPherson, Respondent, v. John E. Andrus, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed by default, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2139

MICHAEL A. MCNEIL,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland; HOWARD COUNTY 

CIRCUIT COURT; DIANE O. LEASURE, Chief Administrative 

Judge, in her Official and Individual Capacity; LOUIS A. 

BECKER, III, Associate Judge, in his Official Capacity; 

MARY M. KRAMER, Master in Chancery, in her Official 

Capacity; LISA S. MOHINK, Family Law Coordinator, in her 

Official and Individual Capacity; PATRICIA BRIGHT, Court 

Social Worker, in her Official and Individual Capacity; 

CHRISTINIA BIEGANSKI, Supervised Visitation Center Manager, 

in her Official and Individual Capacity; SUSAN R. GNATT, 

Supervisory Court Reporter, in her Official and Individual 

Capacity; STEPHEN A. DRAZIN; PETER V. MARKUSKI, JR.; 

SARAH P. MCNEIL; VINCENT LOVE; M. SLUTSKY & ASSOCIATES, 

INC.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-02495-DKC)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Michael A. McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Louis 

Paul Ruzzi, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, 

Maryland; Stephen A. Drazin, Columbia, Maryland; Jeffrey Wayne 

Bernstein, GOOZMAN, BERNSTEIN & MARKUSKI, Laurel, Maryland; 

Sarah P. McNeil, Ellicott City, Maryland; Timothy J. Mummert, 

Ferndale, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and 

related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. McNeil v. Maryland, No. 8:11-cv-02495-DKC 

(D. Md. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny McNeil’s motion to strike the 

Appellees’ briefs and we dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

September 26, 2016 

IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

 REFER TO: M160919 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM – BRIEFING ON NRC 

TRIBAL POLICY STATEMENT, 9:00 A.M., MONDAY, 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2016, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE 

ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 

(OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff and external stakeholders on NRC’s draft final 

Tribal Policy Statement. The external participants included Reid Nelson, Director, Office of 

Federal Agency Programs, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; Heather Westra, 

Consultant, Prairie Island Indian Community; Richard Arnold, Co-Chair, Tribal Caucus, National 

Transportation Stakeholders Forum; Scott Hansen, Executive Committee, National Tribal 

Air Association, Catawba Indian Nation; and R. Budd Haemer, Senior Nuclear Counsel, Indiana 

Michigan Power. 

Further direction will be provided to the staff in the Staff Requirements Memorandum for SECY16-0098, “Tribal Consultation Policy Statement and Protocol.” 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
Subpart 531.1 - Applicability

Parent topic: Part 531 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

531.101 Objectives.

The Senior Procurement Executive is the designee under FAR31.101.
Subpart 5308.4 - FEDERAL SUPPLY

SCHEDULES

Parent topic: Part 5308 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services

5308.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules

(h)(3)(ii)(C) See MP5301.601(a)(i). for approval of a T&M/LH order with a total performance period,

including options, that is more than three years.

5308.405-3 Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA)

(a)(3)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i). for approval to award a single-award Blanket Purchase Agreement

with an estimated value exceeding $100 million (including any options).

5308.405-6 Limited Sources

(b)(3)(ii)(C) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for approval of a written determination that access through e-Buy

is not in Government's interest.

(a)-(d) Justification Approvals

See DAFFARS 5306.304 (a) for the approving officials for proposed orders or BPAs using the limited

or sole source justification at FAR 8.405-6. See the tailorable Limited Sources Justification and

Approval (J&A) template. See DAFFARS 5306.303-1-90 for “Bridge Actions.”
| **INCOME TAXES (Narrative) (Details)**                    | 3 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]**                      |           |   |
| Effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations | 20.70%         | 21.50% |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Percentage of current income tax expense (benefit) and deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to continuing operations.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 740 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 12 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=84230637&loc=d3e32687-109319
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_EffectiveIncomeTaxRateContinuingOperations**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_IncomeTaxDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3870 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3870

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel 
                          Bacon Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NICKY ``NICK'' DANIEL BACON POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6083 Highway 36 West in Rose Bud, Arkansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nicky `Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nicky 
`Nick' Daniel Bacon Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §§14041a, 14041b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 14041a and 14041b were omitted in the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 113–4, title II, §204(a), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 82.

Section 14041a, Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40802, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1209(a), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1509; amended Pub. L. 109–162, title II, §205(a), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3002, related to enhanced training and services to end violence against and abuse of women later in life.

Section 14041b, Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40803, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title II, §1209(a), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1509; amended Pub. L. 109–162, title II, §205(b), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3002, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2007 through 2011.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3718 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3718

 To prioritize certain returning workers for purposes of the numerical 
                 limitation on H-2B temporary workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

 Mr. Keating introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prioritize certain returning workers for purposes of the numerical 
                 limitation on H-2B temporary workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Small and Seasonal 
Businesses Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZATION OF CERTAIN RETURNING WORKERS WITH RESPECT TO H-
              2B NUMERICAL LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(9)(A) Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), an alien who 
        has been present in the United States as an H-2B nonimmigrant 
        during any 1 of the 3 fiscal years immediately preceding the 
        fiscal year of the approved start date of a petition for a 
        nonimmigrant worker described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) 
        shall be prioritized for purposes of the limitation described 
        in paragraph (1)(B) for the fiscal year in which the petition 
        is approved. Such an alien shall be considered a returning 
        worker, except that this subparagraph shall not apply to an 
        alien who has been so prioritized during 3 consecutive fiscal 
        years until the alien has again been lawfully present in the 
        United States as an H-2B nonimmigrant without having been so 
        prioritized.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 5343.1 – GENERAL

5343.102 Policy

If the contract is a space program contract to which SSCI 64-101 applies, contracting officers shall

not execute contract modifications resulting from an engineering change proposal with a contractor

listed on the Contractor Responsibility Watch List (CRWL) without obtaining SSC/CC approval (see

DAFFARS 5309.103(b)(i)).

Parent topic: Part 5343 - Contract Modifications

5343.102-90 Contract Scope Considerations

Contracting officers shall document scope determination when modifying contracts (see the Scope

Determination – MFR template). New work requires competition unless one of the seven exceptions

to competition found in FAR 6.302 applies. When determining whether proposed modifications

constitute new work the following should be considered-

(a) the extent of any changes in the type of work, performance period, and costs between the

modification and the original contract;

(b) whether the original solicitation adequately advised offerors of the potential for the change or

the change was the type that reasonably could have been anticipated; and

(c) whether the modification materially changes the field of competition for the requirement.

For unilateral modifications authorized by clauses other than the Changes clause (e.g., Property

clause, Options clause, Suspension of Work, etc. (see FAR 43.103(b)(3)), a scope determination is

not required to be documented but is highly encouraged.
515.606-2 Evaluation.

(a) The HCA or the Office of Acquisition Policy should complete the evaluation as soon as

practicable, normally within 14 calendar days for initial review or 90 calendar days for

comprehensive evaluation.

(b) The HCA or the Office of Acquisition Policy shall complete a comprehensive evaluation in

accordance with the factors listed in FAR 15.606-2 and any other factors deemed appropriate.

(c) Once complete, the HCA or Office of Acquisition Policy should communicate the results of the

evaluation to the offeror.

Parent topic: 515.606 Agency procedures.