alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.180 Sanctions. ( a ) *Contemptuous conduct* — ( 1 ) *Subject to exclusion or suspension.* Contemptuous conduct by any person before the Commission or a hearing officer during any proceeding, including at or in connection with any conference, deposition or hearing, shall be grounds for the Commission or the hearing officer to: ( i ) Exclude that person from such deposition, hearing or conference, or any portion thereof; and/or
( ii ) Summarily suspend that person from representing others in the proceeding in which such conduct occurred for the duration, or any portion, of the proceeding.
( 2 ) *Review procedure.* A person excluded from a deposition, hearing or conference, or a counsel summarily suspended from practice for the duration or any portion of a proceeding, may seek review of the exclusion or suspension by filing with the Commission, within three days of the exclusion or suspension order, a motion to vacate the order. The Commission shall consider such motion on an expedited basis as provided in § 201.500.
( 3 ) *Adjournment.* Upon motion by a party represented by counsel subject to an order of exclusion or suspension, an adjournment shall be granted to allow the retention of new counsel. In determining the length of an adjournment, the Commission or hearing officer shall consider, in addition to the factors set forth in § 201.161, the availability of co-counsel for the party or of other members of a suspended counsel's firm.
( b ) *Deficient filings; leave to cure deficiencies.* The Commission or the hearing officer may reject, in whole or in part, any filing that fails to comply with any requirements of these Rules of Practice or of any order issued in the proceeding in which the filing was made. Any such filings shall not be part of the record. The Commission or the hearing officer may direct a party to cure any deficiencies and to resubmit the filing within a fixed time period.
( c ) *Failure to make required filing or to cure deficient filing.* The Commission or the hearing officer may enter a default pursuant to § 201.155, dismiss one or more claims, decide the particular claim(s) at issue against that person, or prohibit the introduction of evidence or exclude testimony concerning that claim if a person fails: ( 1 ) To make a filing required under these Rules of Practice; or
( 2 ) To cure a deficient filing within the time specified by the Commission or the hearing officer pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
[60 FR 32796, June 23, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 50234, July 29, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 69603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26452]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, December 6, 2004.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of 
Board Members; 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 26, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-26452 Filed 11-26-04; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 160.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part governs the treatment of nonpublic personal information about consumers by the financial institutions listed in paragraph (b) of this section. This part: ( 1 ) Requires a financial institution to provide notice to customers about its privacy policies and practices;
( 2 ) Describes the conditions under which a financial institution may disclose nonpublic personal information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties; and
( 3 ) Provides a method for consumers to prevent a financial institution from disclosing nonpublic personal information to most nonaffiliated third parties by “opting out” of that disclosure, subject to the exceptions in §§ 160.13, 160.14, and 160.15.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies only to nonpublic personal information about individuals who obtain financial products or services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes from the institutions listed below. This part does not apply to information about companies or about individuals who obtain financial products or services primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes. This part applies to all futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, major swap participants and swap dealers that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, regardless whether they are required to register with the Commission. These entities are hereinafter referred to in this part as “you.” This part does not apply to foreign (non-resident) futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, major swap participants and swap dealers that are not registered with the Commission.
[66 FR 21252, Apr. 27, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 55450, Sept. 10, 2010; 76 FR 43878, July 22, 2011]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 76 FR 60371, Sept. 29, 2011.

#### § 200.19d Director of the Office of Municipal Securities.

The Director of the Office of Municipal Securities is responsible to the Commission for the administration and execution of the Commission's programs under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 relating to the registration and regulation of municipal advisors, the practices of municipal securities brokers and dealers, and oversight of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The functions involved include recommending the adoption and amendment of Commission rules, reviewing proposed rule changes of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and responding to interpretive and no-action requests.

[86 FR 9442, Feb. 16, 2021]
### §1301–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 10, 1946, ch. 951, title II, §202, 60 Stat. 981, defined the term "Administrator" as used in certain sections of this chapter. See section 1301 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles Sander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 26, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Sander                               
|                     |  |  |  | Charles Sander                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of Catcher Holdings, Inc.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
### §1435. Access to books, documents, etc., for purpose of audit

Every contract for loans or annual contributions under the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended [42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.], shall provide that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall, for the purpose of audit and examination, have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the public housing agency entering into such contract that are pertinent to its operations with respect to financial assistance under the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended.

(Aug. 2, 1954, ch. 649, title VIII, §816, 68 Stat. 647; Pub. L. 90–19, §10(i), May 25, 1967, 81 Stat. 23.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, referred to in text, is act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, as revised generally by Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §201(a), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 653, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1437 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the United States Housing Act of 1937 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1967—Pub. L. 90–19 substituted "Secretary of Housing and Urban Development" for "Public Housing Commissioner".
### §1397n–8. No Federal funding for credit enhancements

No amount made available to carry out this division may be used to provide any insurance, guarantee, or other credit enhancement to a State or local government under which a Federal payment would be made to a State or local government as the result of a State or local government failing to achieve an outcome specified in an agreement.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title XX, §2059, as added Pub. L. 115–123, div. E, title VIII, §50802(2), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 281.)
April 21, 2016 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

On behalf of the Commission, I am transmitting the March 2016 monthly status report on 

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) activities and use of unobligated carryover 

funds appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. This report describes NRC activities in March 

2016 to address the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 

the case In re Aiken County regarding the licensing process for the U.S. Department of Energy’s 

Yucca Mountain license application. 

 Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at 301-415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

 Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

 Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

 
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Fred Upton 

Chairman, Committee on Energy 

 and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Frank Pallone, Jr. 

The Honorable John Shimkus 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment 

 and the Economy 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Paul Tonko 

The Honorable James Inhofe 

Chairman, Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Boxer 

The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Clean Air 

 and Nuclear Safety 

Committee on Environment 

 and Public Works 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Thomas R. Carper 

The Honorable Ed Whitfield 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Power 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Bobby L. Rush 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Mike Simpson 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Marcy Kaptur 

The Honorable Lamar Alexander 

Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy 

 and Water Development 

Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein
February 22, 2016 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

 On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am writing in reference 

to my January 15, 2016, letter to you, which responded to a request in the Joint Explanatory 

Statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Action 2016. The Joint Explanatory 

Statement requested NRC to submit a report with the general description and status of the all 

proposed rules currently pending before the commission, including the docket date for the 

proposed rule. After further discussing how to characterize the reporting of agency rulemaking 

activities, we believe that a supplement to the earlier response is necessary. 

 The NRC has several different ways of tracking rulemaking activities. The list of planned 

rulemakings provided in my January 15, 2016, response was based on a list provided in our 

Fiscal Year 2017 Congressional Budget Justification. However, we acknowledge that NRC is 

tracking additional rulemaking activities, including additional rulemakings planned for completion 

in fiscal year 2016, rulemakings that may be terminated, and petitions for rulemaking submitted 

by members of the public. The revised supplement to the earlier response is enclosed. 

 In order to improve clarity and transparency of the NRC’s rulemaking activities, I have 

issued the attached tasking memorandum directing the NRC staff to improve rulemaking 

tracking and reporting and to provide a recommendation for the Commission’s approval by April 

2016. 

Please feel free to contact me or Eugene Dacus, Director of the Office of Congressional 

Affairs, at (301) 415-1776, if you have questions or need more information. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosures: 

As stated 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey
Identical letter sent to: 

The Honorable Harold Rogers 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

cc: Representative Nita Lowey 

The Honorable Thad Cochran 

Chairman, Committee on Appropriations 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

cc: Senator Barbara Mikulski
Exhibit 12.1
 Endeavour International Corporation
 Endeavour International Corporation
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Year Ended December 31,2010
    
    2009
    
    2008Earnings:Income (Loss) before Taxes
    
    $
    55,743
    
    
    $
    (94,687
    )
    
    $
    49,975Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    38,517
    
    
    
    19,697
    
    
    
    26,973Less: Capitalized interest
    
    
    (3,925
    )
    
    
    (3,067
    )
    
    
    (3,998
    )Earnings
    
    $
    98,185
    
    
    $
    (71,923
    )
    
    $
    80,946Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    34,592
    
    
    $
    16,630
    
    
    $
    22,975Capitalized interest
    
    
    3,925
    
    
    
    3,067
    
    
    
    3,998Total fixed charges
    
    $
    38,517
    
    
    $
    19,697
    
    
    $
    26,973Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3.0
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00570-CV

Style: Rita Lemons

v. Betty J. Garmond, Mamie Bright, Justin Thomas, and Jacqueline R. Woodard

Date motion filed: October 5, 2016

Type of motion: Motion for an Extension 

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s motion is dismissed as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Terry Jennings

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 18, 2016
| **Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) - (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                                         |           |   |
| Dividends declared per share (usd per share)                                                             | $ 2.35         | $ 2.30 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
No. 15-081 December 2, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Approves Changes to Reactor Oversight Process

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved changes today to the agency’s Reactor 

Oversight Process, adjusting the criteria for subjecting a nuclear power plant to additional oversight and 

directing the staff to develop new guidance to help identify weaknesses in a licensee’s performance.

The Commissioners approved a staff recommendation to require three low-to-moderate safety 

significance (white) inspection findings or performance indicators to push a reactor into the “degraded 

cornerstone” category of regulatory oversight, often known as Column Three of the Reactor Oversight 

Process Action Matrix. Column One represents a reactor receiving normal oversight and Column Five 

is reserved for reactors ordered to shut down due to unacceptable performance.

The ROP, initiated in 2000, assesses a nuclear power plant’s performance across seven aspects 

of facility operation, called cornerstones. Inspection findings are color-coded as green, white, yellow or 

red, in increasing order of safety significance. Performance indicators are objective data regarding 

licensee performance in the different cornerstones. These safety-significant numbers are compiled by 

licensees and reported to the NRC; they are color-coded in a similar manner. The current criteria would 

move a plant to Column Three based on two white inputs in the same cornerstone or a single yellow 

input. A staff assessment determined that from a risk-informed perspective, three white findings, not 

two, are more closely equivalent to a single yellow input. Moving from Column Two to Column Three 

involves a significant increase in resources for both the NRC and the plant: Column Two involves 

about 40 hours of additional inspections, while Column Three requires 200 hours. The change to three 

white inputs in the same cornerstone better aligns the safety significance to the additional level of 

inspection.

“The Reactor Oversight Process is a mature and effective program,” said Bill Dean, director of 

the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “For the past 15 years, it has helped us provide 

appropriate oversight of the nation’s commercial nuclear power plants. These adaptations will help us 

target our oversight more precisely on those plants with significant performance issues.”

In the Staff Requirements Memorandum approving the criteria change, the Commission also 

directed the staff to include additional resources and guidance for inspectors to review a licensee’s 

common cause analyses for two white inputs in the same cornerstone. The guidance will help identify 

potential programmatic weaknesses in a licensee’s performance.

The changes will take effect in January, and do not alter the current oversight status of any 

plants. The staff’s proposal and assessment of the criteria were spelled out in SECY-15-0108, which 

was made public in August.