alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 227.301 Measures to reduce risk of fraud. An intermediary in a transaction involving the offer or sale of securities in reliance on section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)) must: ( a ) Have a reasonable basis for believing that an issuer seeking to offer and sell securities in reliance on section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)) through the intermediary's platform complies with the requirements in section 4A(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 77d-1(b)) and the related requirements in this part. In satisfying this requirement, an intermediary may rely on the representations of the issuer concerning compliance with these requirements unless the intermediary has reason to question the reliability of those representations;
( b ) Have a reasonable basis for believing that the issuer has established means to keep accurate records of the holders of the securities it would offer and sell through the intermediary's platform, provided that an intermediary may rely on the representations of the issuer concerning its means of recordkeeping unless the intermediary has reason to question the reliability of those representations. An intermediary will be deemed to have satisfied this requirement if the issuer has engaged the services of a transfer agent that is registered under Section 17A of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78q-1(c)).
( c ) Deny access to its platform to an issuer if the intermediary: ( 1 ) Has a reasonable basis for believing that the issuer or any of its officers, directors (or any person occupying a similar status or performing a similar function) or beneficial owners of 20 percent or more of the issuer's outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power, is subject to a disqualification under § 227.503. In satisfying this requirement, an intermediary must, at a minimum, conduct a background and securities enforcement regulatory history check on each issuer whose securities are to be offered by the intermediary and on each officer, director or beneficial owner of 20 percent or more of the issuer's outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power.
( 2 ) Has a reasonable basis for believing that the issuer or the offering presents the potential for fraud or otherwise raises concerns about investor protection. In satisfying this requirement, an intermediary must deny access if it reasonably believes that it is unable to adequately or effectively assess the risk of fraud of the issuer or its potential offering. In addition, if an intermediary becomes aware of information after it has granted access that causes it to reasonably believe that the issuer or the offering presents the potential for fraud or otherwise raises concerns about investor protection, the intermediary must promptly remove the offering from its platform, cancel the offering, and return (or, for funding portals, direct the return of) any funds that have been committed by investors in the offering.
[80 FR 71537, Nov. 16, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 27132, May 7, 2020; 85 FR 54490, Sept. 2, 2020; 86 FR 3592, Jan. 14, 2021]
### §15901. Definition of Secretary

In this part, the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §341, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 697.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle E (§§341–357) of title III of Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 697, which enacted this part, amended sections 6504, 6506a, 6507, and 6508 of this title, sections 184 and 226 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining, and section 1337 of Title 43, Public Lands, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 226 of Title 30. For complete classification of subtitle E to the Code, see Tables.
#### Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Appellant, v. Continental Record Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1
      **I, Rodney B. Mott, certify that:**
      1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of InternationalSteel Group Inc.;
      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
      3. [Intentionally left blank.];
      4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
      5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 10, 2005 /s/ Rodney B. Mott   Rodney B. Mott   Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) 

EPFAQ Number: 2015-014 Date Accepted for Review: 04-DEC-15 

Originator: DON JOHNSON 

Organization: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Relevant Guidance: NEI 99-01 REV. 6 

Applicable Section(s): EAL HS6 

Status: Public Comment Period

QUESTION OR COMMENT: 

Should consideration be given to allow for specifying relevant operating modes for the key 

safety functions listed in this EAL (reactivity control, core cooling, or reactor coolant system 

(RCS) heat removal)? 

PROPOSED SOLUTION: 

The industry agrees that consideration be given to allow for specifying relevant operating modes 

for the key safety functions listed in Initiating Condition HS6 (reactivity control, core cooling, or 

reactor coolant system (RCS) heat removal). The following recommended approach is provided 

for staff consideration. 

Key Safety Function BWR Operating Mode PWR Operating Mode 

Reactivity Control 1 and 2 1, 2, and 3 

Core Cooling (PWR) / RPV 

Water Level (BWR) All except defueled 

RCS Heat Removal 

Following the selection of a solution by the staff, the industry would like to have an opportunity 

to provide input on recommended Basis and Developer Note information to be included in the 

final EP FAQ as these are important for consistent implementation. We anticipate providing this 

input during the public comment period. 

Consistent with the guidance in Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2003-18, Supplement 2, Use 

of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, “Methodology for Development of Emergency Action 

Levels”, Revision 4, dated January 2003, it is reasonable to conclude that the change proposed 

above would be considered as a “deviation.” 

NRC RESPONSE: 

The staff agrees with this proposed solution. 

This is considered a “deviation” in accordance with Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2003-18, 

Supplement 2, “Use of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Methodology for Development of 

Emergency Action Levels, Revision 4,” dated January 2003.
§ 5.58 Answer and request for a hearing. ( a ) An answer and request for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission within thirty (30) days after service of the order to show cause.
( b ) In the absence of good cause shown, failure to file an answer and request for a hearing within the specified time limit: ( 1 ) Will be deemed a waiver of the respondent's right to contest the allegations of the show cause order or request a hearing and
( 2 ) Shall authorize the Commission to find the facts to be as alleged in the show cause order and enter a final decision providing for the imposition of such sanctions specified in § 5.67 as the Commission deems appropriate.
( c ) An answer shall contain ( 1 ) a concise statement of the facts or law constituting each ground of defense and
( 2 ) specific admission, denial, or explanation of each fact alleged in the show cause order or, if the respondent is without knowledge thereof, a statement to that effect. Any allegations of a complaint not answered in this manner will be deemed admitted.
( d ) Hearings shall be deemed waived as to any facts in the show cause order that are specifically admitted or deemed to be admitted as a result of respondent's failure to deny them. Those portions of respondent's answer, together with the show cause order, will provide a record basis for initial decision by the Administrative Law Judge or for final decision by the Commission.
( e ) If all material factual allegations of the show cause order are specifically admitted or have been deemed admitted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the Commission will decide the matter on the basis of the allegations set forth in the show cause order and respondent's answer.
#### § 148.21 Filing and service of documents.

Any application for an award or other pleading or document related to an application shall be filed and served on all parties to the adjudicatory proceeding, except as provided in § 148.12(b) for confidential financial information.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

May 10, 2016 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – SECY-16-0042 – RECOMMENDED 

IMPROVEMENTS FOR RULEMAKING TRACKING AND 

REPORTING 

The Commission has approved the staff's recommendations to improve tracking and reporting 

of rulemaking activities. Specifically, the Commission has approved the staff's recommendations 

to: 

• develop a centralized rulemaking activity-tracking tool; 

• issue an Annual Rulemaking Report that would replace four long-standing reports 

without affecting those reports required by law or Executive Order; 

• redesign the rulemaking pages on the NRC's public website to provide information that is 

closer to "real time"; 

• issue a glossary for rulemaking terminology; and 

• implement conforming changes to the office procedures and management directives. 

To give the Commission and internal stakeholders a complete picture of rulemaking activities, 

the staff should provide appropriate links to the centralized activity-tracking tool within the 

Annual Rulemaking Report. 

In the context of tracking rulemaking activities and the glossary of rulemaking terms, the staff 

should not classify rules under the headings "could impose new burden" or "could reduce 

burden." The staff should use neutral, objective descriptions, such as "could establish new 

requirements" and "could reduce or clarify existing requirements." 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OPA 

ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

PDR
### §14100. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11006(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1817

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200111, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2056, provided assistance to States and localities employing Police Corps officers.
### §15421. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15421 was editorially reclassified as section 21021 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
Part 5323 - Environment, Energy and Water

Efficiency, Renewable Energy Technologies,

Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free

Workplace

DAFFARS PART 5323 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5323.3 — HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA

5323.370-4 Procedures

Subpart 5323.8 — OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES

5323.803 Policy

5323.804-90 Contract Clauses

Subpart 5323.90 — HEALTH AND SAFETY ON GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS

5323.9001 Contract Clause

Subpart 5323.3 — HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

IDENTIFICATION AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA

5323.370-4 Procedures

(1) Preaward phase.

(i)(A)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5323.8 — OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES

5323.803 Policy

(a) Requiring activities must obtain approval in accordance with AFMAN 32-7002 Environmental

Compliance and Pollution Prevention, paragraph 3.3.5.1.1.8 before a specification or standard that

requires the use of a class I ozone-depleting substance (ODS), or that can be met only through the

use of an ODS, is authorized in any solicitation or contract/order.
5323.804-90 Contract Clauses

Include DAFFARS clause 5352.223-9000 in all solicitations and contracts/orders unless the requiring

activity obtains the approval IAW paragraph 5323.803(a) above. If approval is obtained, the

contracting officer must instead use FAR clause 52.223-11.

Subpart 5323.90 — HEALTH AND SAFETY ON

GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS

5323.9001 Contract Clause

The contracting officer may insert DAFFARS clause 5352.223-9001 in solicitations and contracts,

other than for construction, which require performance on a Government installation if needed. The

contracting officer should coordinate these requirements with the Chief Engineer and include this

clause only for efforts where these requirements are not already spelled out in the technical

requirements documents which will also be included in the resultant contract.
#### § 201.31 Purpose of these rules.

The Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504 (called *the Act* in this subpart B), provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (called *adversary adjudications*) before the Commission. An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails over the Commission, unless the Commission's position was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The rules in this subpart describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the Commission will use in ruling on those applications.

[54 FR 53051, Dec. 27, 1989]
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of HiEnergy  Technologies,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bogdan
C.  Maglich,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Treasurer  of the  Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ B. C. Maglich
-----------------------------------
Bogdan C. Maglich
Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
August 8 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7531

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN J. WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00068-TSE-1; 1:12-cv-00650-TSE)

Submitted: January 2, 2013 Decided: January 10, 2013

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Kara Martin Traster, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Washington seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2012) motion as successive and denying his motion for 

reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Washington has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal.
3

Additionally, we construe Washington’s notice of 

appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or 

successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 

200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to 

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims 

based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously 

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to 

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for 

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found 

the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of 

constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by 

the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255(h) (West Supp. 2012). Washington’s claims do not satisfy 

either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to 

file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
### §16153. Plan

Not later than 6 months after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a coordinated plan for the programs described in this subchapter and any other programs of the Department that are directly related to fuel cells or hydrogen. The plan shall describe, at a minimum—

(1) the agenda for the next 5 years for the programs authorized under this subchapter, including the agenda for each activity enumerated in section 16154(e) of this title;

(2) the types of entities that will carry out the activities under this subchapter and what role each entity is expected to play;

(3) the milestones that will be used to evaluate the programs for the next 5 years;

(4) the most significant technical and nontechnical hurdles that stand in the way of achieving the goals described in section 16154 of this title, and how the programs will address those hurdles; and

(5) the policy assumptions that are implicit in the plan, including any assumptions that would affect the sources of hydrogen or the marketability of hydrogen-related products.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title VIII, §804, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 845.)
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  Dated: August 10, 2010
    /s/ BRET W. JOHNSENBret W. JohnsenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3762 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to include occupational therapists 

as behavioral and mental health professionals for purposes of the National Health Service Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2011 

Mr. TONKO (for himself and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to include occupational therapists as behavioral and mental health professionals for purposes of the National Health Service 

Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUDING OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS AS 

4 BEHAVIORAL AND MENTAL HEALTH PROFES5 SIONALS FOR PURPOSES OF THE NATIONAL 

6 HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

7 Section 331(a)(1)(E)(i) of the Public Health Service 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(1)(E)(i)) is amended by inserting 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3762 IH

1 ‘‘occupational therapists,’’ after ‘‘psychiatric nurse spe2 cialists,’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 204.60 Purpose.

This subpart provides procedures for the Commission to collect money from a debtor's disposable pay by means of administrative wage garnishment to satisfy a delinquent nontax debt owed to the United States.