alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3835 

To extend the pay limitation for Members of Congress and Federal employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2012 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend the pay limitation for Members of Congress and 

Federal employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PAY LIMITATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 147 of the Continuing 

5 Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 111–242; 5 U.S.C. 

6 5303 note), as added by section 1(a) of the Continuing 

7 Appropriations and Surface Transportation Extensions 

8 Act, 2011 (Public Law 111–322; 124 Stat. 3518), is 

9 amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3835 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘December 

2 31, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘December 31, 

4 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’. 

5 (b) APPLICATION TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH.— 

6 (1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.—The extension of 

7 the pay limit for Federal employees through Decem8 ber 31, 2013, as established pursuant to the amend9 ments made by subsection (a), shall apply to Mem10 bers of Congress in accordance with section 601(a) 

11 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 

12 U.S.C. 31). 

13 (2) OTHER LEGISLATIVE BRANCH EMPLOY14 EES.— 

15 (A) LIMIT IN PAY.—Notwithstanding any 

16 other provision of law, no cost of living adjust17 ment required by statute with respect to a legis18 lative branch employee which (but for this sub19 paragraph) would otherwise take effect during 

20 the period beginning on the date of enactment 

21 of this Act and ending on December 31, 2013, 

22 shall be made. 

23 (B) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the 

24 term ‘‘legislative branch employee’’ means— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3835 IH

1 (i) an employee of the Federal Gov2 ernment whose pay is disbursed by the 

3 Secretary of the Senate or the Chief Ad4 ministrative Officer of the House of Rep5 resentatives; and 

6 (ii) an employee of any office of the 

7 legislative branch who is not described in 

8 clause (i). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
5333.292  Appeals to the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC)       (a) The Department of Justice represents the Department of the Air Force in appeals brought before the COFC. The Air Force Commercial Litigation Field Support Center (AF/JACQ) serves as the Department of the Air Force counsel with the Department of Justice in such appeals.         (b) The contracting officer must notify the cognizant legal office and the SCO of any notice of appeal to the COFC. The cognizant legal office must forward a copy of the notice to SAF/GCR and AF/JACQ.         (c) The contracting officer must assist the cognizant legal office in preparing the litigation report. The contracting officer must obtain approval from the AF/JACQ trial attorney prior to releasing the litigation report outside government.     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5333.2 – DISPUTES AND APPEALS
First Department,

December, 1916.

#### Jacob Davidson and Others, Copartners, etc., Appellants, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

Appeal from an order granting a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the provisions of the Code* with reference to examinations do not apply to municipal corporations. (See *Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.*v. *City of New York, 149*App. Div. 494.) Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

*

 See Code Civ. Proc. § 870 *et*seq.— [Rep.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




              CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
              --------------------------------------------------


      The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

      Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




     By: /s/ Gary Nickele                   By: /s/ Gailen J. Hull
         ---------------------------            ---------------------------
         Gary Nickele                           Gailen J. Hull
         Chief Executive Officer                Chief Financial Officer and
                                                Chief Accounting Officer
(June 25, 1953.)

#### Frank C. La Bue, Respondent, v. Tilo Roofing Company, Inc., Appellant.

— Motion for stay of judgment pending application in this court or in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal granted on condition (1) that, within five days after entry of the order hereon, appellant make application in this court for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and (2) that the application in the Court of Appeals be made within the time prescribed by subdivision 3 of section 592 of the Civil Practice Act; otherwise, motion for stay denied, with $10 costs. Motion for temporary stay of execution dismissed, without costs. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 710; *post,*p. 762.]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Laraby, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 162]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered February 28, 2005 in St. Lawrence County, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

In 1992, defendant was convicted of sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree as a result of a series of sexual encounters he had with his adopted daughter and one of her friends. He was sentenced, respectively, to concurrent terms of 3 to 9 years and *21⁄3*to 7 years in prison. After he was released from prison, he was classified as a risk level III sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. He was subsequently afforded a rehearing pursuant to the stipulation in *Doe v Pataki*(3 F Supp 2d 456 [SD NY 1998]) after which he was again classified as a risk level III sex offender. Defendant appeals.

Initially, defendant contends that Supreme Court did not comply with paragraphs 12 and 13 of the stipulation set forth in *Doe v Pataki (supra)*in classifying him as a risk level III sex offender. In particular, he asserts that the court failed to give due consideration to the exemplary conduct that he has exhibited since his initial registration, which includes his maintenance of a full-time job and a clean parole record. The transcripts of the proceedings, however, disclose that the court specifically considered these factors, as well as defendant’s participation in *1131a sex offender treatment program, and even adjourned the hearing to receive more evidence on these issues. The court was not bound by the stipulation to reduce defendant’s risk assessment based upon these factors, but rather it properly considered them in the context of other relevant factors in deciding to adhere to the risk level III classification. While we find merit to defendant’s further claim that Supreme Court improperly imposed 10 points based upon his use of violence — inasmuch as the guidelines provide that the age of the victim shall not be the sole basis for such a finding *(see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 8 [Nov 1997]) — he would still be categorized as a risk level III sex offender when such points are deducted from his current score. Therefore, we find no basis to disturb the risk level III classification.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| Open-File Report 03–248    |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## HYDROGEOLOGIC, WATER-QUALITY, AND GEOCHEMICAL DATA FOR THE FROHNER MEADOWS AREA, UPPER LUMP GULCH, JEFFERSON COUNTY, MONTANA

#### By Terry L. Klein, Michael R. Cannon, and David L. Fey

| The purpose of this report is to present data from a comprehensive study of the hydrogeology, surface- and ground-water quality, and geochemistry of surficial geologic materials from the Frohner Meadows area. This report presents hydrogeologic, water-quality, and geochemical data for the Frohner Meadow.

**Version 1.0**
Posted August 2003
Part or all of this report is presented in Excel and Portable Document Format. The latest              version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required              to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat              Reader free of charge, click here. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| -  **Report** PDF file (1.3 MB) | **For viewing and printing upon download.***(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation        Act of 1973, Amendments of 1998.)* |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2003/ofr-03-248/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:06 EDT 2013 |  |

----
Exhibit No. 32

# Certification of
Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Paul M. Bonaiuto, Executive
Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc.,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 28, 2008 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven J. Smith
 Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2008

/s/ Paul M. Bonaiuto
 Paul M. Bonaiuto, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2008
§ 165.20 Whistleblower anti-retaliation protections. ( a ) *In general.* No employer may discharge, demote, suspend, directly or indirectly threaten or harass, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistleblower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistleblower— ( 1 ) In providing information to the Commission in accordance with this part; or
( 2 ) In assisting in any investigation or judicial or administrative action of the Commission based upon or related to such information.
( b ) *Anti-retaliation enforcement.* Section 23(h)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 26(h)(1)), including the rules in this part promulgated thereunder, shall be enforceable in an action or proceeding brought by the Commission including where retaliation is in response to a whistleblower providing information to the Commission after reporting the information through internal whistleblower, legal or compliance procedures.
( c ) *Protections apply regardless of non-qualification.* The anti-retaliation protections apply whether or not the whistleblower satisfies the requirements, procedures, and conditions to qualify for an award.
[82 FR 24501, May 30, 2017]
§ 160.14 Exceptions to notice and opt out requirements for processing and servicing transactions. ( a ) *Exceptions for processing and servicing transactions at consumer's request.* The requirements for initial notice in § 160.4(a)(2), for the opt out in §§ 160.7 and 160.10, and for initial notice in § 160.13 in connection with service providers and joint marketing, do not apply if you disclose nonpublic personal information as necessary to effect, administer, or enforce a transaction that a consumer requests or authorizes, or in connection with: ( 1 ) Processing or servicing a financial product or service that a consumer requests or authorizes;
( 2 ) Maintaining or servicing the consumer's account with you, or with another entity as part of an extension of credit on behalf of such entity as part of a private label credit card program or other extension of credit on behalf of such entity; or
( 3 ) A proposed or actual securitization, secondary market sale or similar transaction related to a transaction of the consumer.
( b ) *Necessary to effect, administer or enforce a transaction* means that the disclosure is: ( 1 ) Required, or is one of the lawful or appropriate methods, to enforce your rights or the rights of other persons engaged in carrying out the financial transaction or providing the product or service; or
( 2 ) Required, or is a usual, appropriate or acceptable method: ( i ) To carry out the transaction or the product or service business of which the transaction is a part, and record, service or maintain the consumer's account in the ordinary course of providing the financial service or financial product;
( ii ) To administer or service benefits or claims relating to the transaction or the product or service business of which it is a part;
( iii ) To provide a confirmation, statement or other record of the transaction, or information on the status or value of the financial service or financial product to the consumer or the consumer's agent or broker;
( iv ) To accrue or recognize incentives or bonuses associated with the transaction that are provided by you or any other party;
( v ) In connection with: ( A ) The authorization, settlement, billing, processing, clearing, transferring, reconciling or collection of amounts charged, debited or otherwise paid using a debit, credit or other payment card, check or account number, or by other payment means;
( B ) The transfer of receivables, accounts or interests therein; or
( C ) The audit of debit, credit or other payment information.
EXHIBIT 31.1Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, Ann L. Schmitt, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Across America Real EstateCorp.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure the material information relating to the smallbusiness issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer (s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007By:  /s/ Ann L. Schmitt   Chief Executive Officer
#### § 0.10 Office of the Executive Director.

The Executive Director, under the direction of the Chairman, is the chief operating official who develops and implements management and administrative policies, programs, and directives for the Commission. The Executive Director works closely with the Bureaus on strategic planning and assessing the management and resource implications of any proposed action. In addition, the Executive Director manages the Commission's facilities and administrative services, financial management, information technology, and human resources.

[65 FR 78408, Dec. 15, 2000, as amended at 86 FR 38546, July 22, 2021]
### Part B—Education for Homeless Children and Youths
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00059-CR

Kevin Dean Dunn

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1298839)

May 21, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Gnome Bakers, Inc., Respondent, and John O’Rourke, Designated as *“*Trustee ” of Bakery & Pastry Drivers and Helpers Union Local No. 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, A. F. of L., an Unincorporated Association, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Vincent F. Sollitto Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Syntax-Brillian Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 16, 2007              /s/ Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto Jr.   Chief Executive Officer