alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M150218C 

February 26, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Mark A. Satorius 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON PROJECT AIM 2020 

(SECY-15-0015), 1:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 

2015, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE 

FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC 

ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff on Project AIM 2020. 

The Commission will provide direction to the staff on this matter in the staff requirements 

memorandum on SECY-15-0015, Project Aim 2020 Report and Recommendations. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science 

1-200 

APPENDIX 3. LETTER FROM SENATOR JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN TO NCLIS 

CHAIRPERSON MARTHA B. GOULD, JULY 17, 2000 

United States Senate 

Committee on Governmental Affairs 

Washington, DC 20510-6250

July 17, 2000 

The Honorable Martha Gould 

Chairperson 

United States National Commission on Libraries and Information Science 

1110 Vermont Avenue, NW 

Suite 820 

Washington, DC 20005-3552 

Dear Chairperson Gould: 286 

I am writing to join in Senator McCain's June 12 request for a review of reforms to improve the 

federal government's information dissemination practices. The results of that study will prove 

invaluable to my work as Ranking Democrat of the Governmental Affairs Committee, which has 

jurisdiction over most of our federal government's information dissemination practices. The study will 

also help inform my efforts to promote e-government, which includes making federal information 

more available over the Internet. 

I would suggest two additions to the Commission's study. Senator McCain's letter of June 12 asked 

that the Commission include assessments of the need for proposing new or revised laws or regulations. 

I would ask that the Commission include in that review any relevant sections of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act that may need revision, because the Committee will be considering the law's 

reauthorization next Congress. Second, when the Commission considers the future of the National 

Technical Information Service, I would ask that it consider the viability of maintaining NTIS as a 

centralized fully electronic repository of federal scientific and technical information, accessible via the 

Internet and equipped with search and retrieval capabilities. 

Please contact Kevin Landy of my staff at (202) 224-7194 with questions about this request. 

Sincerely, 

/signed/ 

Joseph I. Lieberman 

 

286 Available at http://www.nclis.gov/govt/assess/liebermn.html and http://www.nclis.gov/govt/assess/assess.appen3.pdf.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report'), Joni K. Troska, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Joni K. Troska
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Joni K. Troska,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

Dated: MAY 16, 2005
No: IV-15-010 April 8, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

 Lara Uselding, 817-200-1519

NRC Says Wolf Creek Nuclear Plant Has Improved Work Environment

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a letter to Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp. 

(WCNOC) officials saying they have adequately addressed safety conscious work environment 

concerns at the Wolf Creek nuclear plant, located north of Burlington, Kan. 

On Aug. 19, 2013, the NRC sent WCNOC a chilling effect letter following identification of two 

safety culture concerns. First, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety & Health 

Administration issued a discrimination finding to Enercon, a contractor, for firing a worker who raised 

concerns with how work was being performed at the plant. The NRC determined that the firing might 

affect the willingness of other workers to raise safety concerns on safety-related work at the plant. 

Second, NRC found that a chilled work environment existed within the plant’s quality 

assurance group that performs audits of safety-related work. A chilled work environment is one in 

which workers are hesitant to raise safety concerns for fear of retaliation. In response to the NRC’s 

chilling effect letter, WCNOC officials implemented a range of corrective actions and conducted safety 

culture surveys at the site to assess the effectiveness of those actions, which yielded positive results.

In January and February of this year, NRC inspectors reviewed WCNOC’s corrective actions 

and interviewed plant employees to verify actions taken were effective. The report documents NRC’s 

inspection results verifying that the new site-wide programs aimed at improving the work environment 

have been successful in addressing the issues that led to a chilled work environment.

Today, NRC also issued a letter to Enercon saying the contract company has successfully 

implemented corrective actions to ensure workers feel free to raise concerns without fear of retaliation.

NRC will continue to monitor the plant operator’s ongoing activities to ensure they are effective 

in maintaining a long-term healthy work environment.
CNA Chief Administration Officer Tom Pontarelli to Retire





CHICAGO, December 12, 2016 - CNA today announced that the company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Administration Officer, Tom Pontarelli, has decided to retire, effective December 31, 2016. Pontarelli’s decision to retire brings to a close a notable insurance career of nearly 43 years.





“During his 19 years at CNA, Tom has made significant contributions towards the company’s success. He has been a trusted advisor to many colleagues across all levels of CNA,” said Dino E. Robusto, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, CNA.





In his role as Chief Administration Officer, Pontarelli has been responsible for the company’s human resources, corporate communications, enterprise sourcing, business process reengineering, information technology, worldwide operations, safety and security, and facilities. He has also been a member of the company’s Executive Committee, which is responsible for strategy, results and oversight for all business units of CNA.





About CNA


Serving businesses and professionals since 1897, CNA is the country’s eighth largest commercial insurance writer and the 14th largest property and casualty company. CNA’s insurance products include commercial lines, specialty lines, surety, marine and other property and casualty coverages. CNA's services include risk management, information services, underwriting, risk control and claims administration. For more information, please visit CNA at www.cna.com . "CNA" is a service mark registered by CNA Financial Corporation with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Certain CNA Financial Corporation subsidiaries use the "CNA" service mark in connection with insurance underwriting and claims activities.





Follow CNA (NYSE: CNA) on: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube








# # #





CONTACT:


Brandon Davis, 312-822-5167 / 312-834-6091


Sarah Pang, 312-822-6394 / 312-607-5544
### §17306. Agreements of indemnity

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term "Federal Government" includes wholly owned Government corporations, and officers and employees of the Government or its executive departments, independent establishments, and agencies while acting in their official capacity.

(b) Authority To Make Agreement.—The Secretary of the Treasury may make and deliver, on behalf of the Federal Government, a binding agreement of indemnity the Secretary considers necessary and proper to enable the Government to obtain the replacement of any instrument or document—

(1) received by the Government or an agent of the Government in the agent's official capacity; and

(2) which, after having been received, is lost, destroyed, or so mutilated as to impair its value.

(c) When Federal Government Not Obligated.—The Government is not obligated under an agreement of indemnity if the obligee named in the agreement makes a payment or delivery not required by law on the original of the instrument or document covered by the agreement.

(d) Use of Fund for the Payment of Government Losses in Shipment.—The fund described in section 17303 of this title is available to pay any obligation arising out of an agreement the Secretary makes under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1282.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 17306(a) | 40:729(a) (last sentence). | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §7(a) (last sentence), 50 Stat. 480; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 665, §3, 53 Stat. 1359. |
| 17306(b) | 40:725 (1st sentence words before proviso). | July 8, 1937, ch. 444, §3b, as added Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 665, §2, 53 Stat. 1359. |
| 17306(c) | 40:725 (1st sentence proviso). | |
| 17306(d) | 40:725 (last sentence). | |

Section
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134859 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134859 

 COA: 277727 

Wayne CC: 02-008330-01 

SPENCER HOGAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 20 1 5 - 2 20 7 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 1 5 - CE - 0 0 3 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following: If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following:

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
#### Marius Charlet, Appellant-Respondent, v. James E. Koegel, Respondent; Croton Falls Supply, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
#### § 1500.46 Method for determining flashpoint of extremely flammable contents of self-pressurized containers.

Use the apparatus described in § 1500.43a. Use some means such as dry ice in an open container to chill the pressurized container. Chill the container, the flash cup, and the bath solution of the apparatus (brine or glycol may be used) to a temperature of about 25 °F below zero. Puncture the chilled container to exhaust the propellant. Transfer the chilled formulation to the test apparatus and test in accordance with the method described in § 1500.43a.

[51 FR 28544, Aug. 8, 1986]
#### § 301.42 Deception as to nature of business.

When necessary to avoid deception, the name of any person other than the manufacturer of the fur product appearing on the label or invoice shall be accompanied by appropriate words showing that the fur product was not manufactured by such person; as for example:

Distributed by ____________

or

____________ Wholesalers
### §14043b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14043b was editorially reclassified as section 12441 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

d0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

146666(98)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146666

COA: 300952

Wayne CC: 10

- 004178

- 02

- FC

MARTEZ ROMAL BICKHAM,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 29, 2013

order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
§ 1101.31 General requirements. ( a ) *Timing of decisions.* The Commission will attempt to make its decision on disclosure so that it can disclose information in accordance with section 6(b) as soon as is reasonably possible after expiration of the statutory fifteen day moratorium on disclosure.
( b ) *Inclusion of comments.* In disclosing any information under this section, the Commission will include any comments or other information submitted by the manufacturer or private labeler unless the manufacturer or private labeler at the time it submits its section 6(b) comments specifically requests the Commission not to include the comments or to include only a designated portion of the comments and disclosure of the comments on such a designated portion is not necessary to assure that the disclosure of the information which is the subject of the comments is fair in the circumstances.
( c ) *Explanatory statements.* Where appropriate, the Commission will accompany the disclosure of information subject to this subpart with an explanatory statement that makes the nature of the information disclosed clear to the public. Inclusion of an explanatory statement is in addition to, and not a substitute for, taking reasonable steps to assure the accuracy of information. To the extent it is practical the Commission will also accompany the disclosure with any other relevant information in its possession that places the released information in context.
( d ) *Information previously disclosed.* If the Commission has previously disclosed, in accordance with section 6(b)(1), the identical information it intends to disclose again in the same format, it will not customarily take any additional steps to assure accuracy unless the Commission has some reason to question its accuracy or unless the firm, in its comments responding to the Commission's initial section 6(b) notice, specifically requests the opportunity to comment on subsequent disclosures, or unless the Commission determines that sufficient time has passed to warrant seeking section 6(b) comment again. Before disclosing the information the Commission will again review the information to see if accuracy is called into question and will further look to whether disclosure is fair in the circumstances and reasonably related to effectuating the purposes of the Acts the Commission administers.
[48 FR 57430, Dec. 29, 1983, as amended at 73 FR 72335, Nov. 28, 2008]
No: III-14-029 July 14, 2014

CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663

NRC Proposes $3,500 Civil Penalty to Indiana Hospital

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $3,500 civil penalty against Deaconess 

Hospital for a security-related violation stemming from a routine NRC materials inspection. Deaconess 

operates facilities in Evansville and Newburgh, Ind.

The NRC conducted the inspection between March and April 2014. NRC staff looked at the usage 

of licensed materials for diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine. Once the violation of NRC 

requirements was identified, the hospital took immediate corrective actions to restore compliance.

Details about security-related violations are not made public.

A copy of the Enforcement Letter will be available on the Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System (ADAMS) at the NRC website.
Part 5330 - Cost Accounting Standards

Administration

DAFFARS PART 5330 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5330.2 — CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

5330.201 Contract requirements.

5330.201-5 Waivers

5330.202 Disclosure requirements.

5330.202-6 Responsibilities

Subpart 5330.2 — CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

5330.201 Contract requirements.

5330.201-5 Waivers

(a)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i). Submit CAS waiver requests through the SCO to the cognizant HCA

Workflow for OUSD(A&S)/DPC review no later than 45 days before the anticipated contract award.

Waiver requests must include all items listed in FAR 30.201-5(c) and, for exceptional case CAS

waivers, also address the items at DFARS PGI 230.201-5, and include the determination required by

DFARS 230.201-5(a)(1)(A)(2).

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5330.202 Disclosure requirements.

5330.202-6 Responsibilities

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-53,781]


Bes-Tex Fabrics, Inc., New York, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 11, 2003 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Bes-Tex 
Fabrics, Inc., New York, New York.
    The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate 
or threaten to separate a significant number or proportion of workers 
as required by section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. Significant number 
or proportion of the workers means that at least three workers in a 
firm with a workforce of fewer than 50 workers would have to be 
affected. Separations by the subject firm did not meet this threshold 
level; consequently the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of January 2004.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-2601 Filed 2-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
May 18, 2016 

Mr. Howard Shelanski, Administrator 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Management and Budget 

Washington, DC 20503 

Dear Mr. Shelanski: 

 In response to Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” signed 

September 30, 1993, I am enclosing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) 

Statement of Regulatory Priorities for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017. The Statement of Regulatory 

Priorities describes the most important and significant rulemakings that the NRC is considering 

issuing in proposed or final form during FY 2017. 

 

 You may direct questions about the NRC’s Statement of Regulatory Priorities for FY 

2017 to Ms. Leslie Terry, Rules Team Leader in the Rules, Announcements, and Directives 

Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, at 301-415-1167. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

Stephen G. Burns 

Enclosure: 

As stated
Order entered October 2 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00856
- CV
THE KANSAS CITY SOUT HERN RAILWAY COMPANY , Appellant
V. ANGELA HORTON AND KE VIN HOUSER, Appellee s On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 06507



### O RDER Before the Court is the October 27, 2019 second request of Antionette Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68 th Judicial District C ourt, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s
record. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 2, 2019 . We caution Ms. Reagor that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE