alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 15-026 April 24, 2015

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Comment on Draft Environmental Impact Statement

For Bell Bend New Reactor

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, are

seeking public comment on a preliminary conclusion that environmental impacts would not prevent 

issuing a Combined License (COL) for a new reactor at the Bell Bend site in Pennsylvania. The site is 

adjacent to the existing Susquehanna nuclear power plant, about 70 miles northeast of Harrisburg, Pa.

The NRC staff’s preliminary environmental recommendation is that the license could be issued. 

The staff’s conclusion is based on its independent review of information in the application submitted by 

PPL Bell Bend. The review took into account consultations with other federal agencies.

The staff also consulted with state, tribal and local governments, and considered comments 

received during the public scoping process in early 2009 and in 2012. The staff’s preliminary 

conclusions include a finding that there are no environmentally preferable or obviously superior sites.

The staff must also complete a separate review of safety issues and a mandatory hearing must be held

before the Commission makes a decision on the license.

The staff documents these preliminary conclusions in NUREG-2179, “Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement (EIS) for Combined Licenses for Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant.” The draft EIS will 

be available on Regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2008-0603. The public can comment on the 

draft EIS until July 10. The comment period includes public meetings June 4 in Bloomsburg, Pa. The 

NRC will issue a separate notice for the meetings in the near future. Comments can be submitted, using 

Docket ID NRC-2008-0603, through Regulations.gov or by mailing them to Cindy Bladey, Office of 

Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN 12 H8, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 

20555-0001.

The COL review process includes examination of the potential environmental impacts from 

construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the designated site. PPL submitted the COL

application on October 10, 2008, and updated the application’s environmental report in March 2012. If 

approved, the COL would give PPL permission to build and operate a U.S. EPR reactor at the site.

More information on the PPL application is available on the NRC website.

The COL application includes activities that require Army Corps of Engineers authorization 

under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899. Those 

activities are described in the draft EIS. The Corps is reviewing PPL’s permit application to authorize

those activities, and the Corps will publish a separate public notice detailing the activities proposed for 

Corps review and authorization.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Samuel Roy Jackson

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 881

- C R

Trial court case number: 913043

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 10 , 2018

Relator

, Samuel Roy Jackson

, has filed a motion for rehearing

. It is ordered that

the motion is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Terry Jennings

______ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Blan d

.

Date: ___ December 20, 2018

____
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By: /s/  Gary Nickele               By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
        ---------------------------         ---------------------------
        Gary Nickele                        Gailen J. Hull
        Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3857 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/ 

11 Commission Act of 2007 to require the Secretary 

of Homeland Security to include as an eligible use the 

sustainment of specialized operational teams used by 

local law enforcement under the Transit Security Grant 

Program, and for other purposes. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3857 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Transit Security 

5 and Local Law Enforcement Support Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING USE OF GRANT FUNDS 

7 RELATING TO OPERATIONAL COSTS OF PUB8 LIC TRANSIT SECURITY. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1406(b)(2) of the Imple10 menting Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 

11 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1135(b)(2)) is amended— 

12 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) 

13 through (H) as subparagraphs (F) through (I), re14 spectively; and 

15 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol16 lowing new subparagraph (E): 

17 ‘‘(E) specialized patrol teams, as defined 

18 by the Secretary in coordination with the recipi19 ents of grants under this section, including the 

20 sustainment of such teams without fiscal year 

21 limitation, as long as the eligible public trans22 portation agency applying for grant funds to 

23 fund a specialized patrol team submits a 

24 sustainment plan for maintaining in future 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3857 RFS 

1 years the capability or capacity achieved with 

2 the grant funds;’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of enactment 

5 of this Act and shall apply to grants made under section 

6 1406 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 

7 Commission Act of 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1135) on or after such 

8 date. 

9 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

10 1406(m)(1) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 

11 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (6 U.S.C. 1135(m)(1)) is 

12 amended— 

13 (1) in subparagraph (D) by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

14 the end; 

15 (2) in subparagraph (E)— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘10 percent’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘50 percent’’; and 

18 (B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; 

19 and’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(F) $400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

22 2012 and 2013, except that not more than 50 

23 percent of such funds in each of such fiscal 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3857 RFS 

1 years may be used for operational costs under 

2 subsection (b)(2).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No: IV-15-024 August 17, 2015

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (817) 200-1128

 Lara Uselding (817) 100-1519

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Wolf Creek Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Fabian Thomas as 

the new Resident Inspector at Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station located 

in Burlington, Kan.

 “Fabian Thomas’ experience, training, and commitment to safety 

will help the NRC in its mission to protect people and the environment by 

ensuring the safe operation of Wolf Creek,” said NRC Region IV 

Administrator Marc Dapas.

 Thomas joined the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, in 

2013 as a project engineer in the Resident Inspector Development Program. 

Previously he worked for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear 

Security Administration overseeing facility and infrastructure upgrade projects. Thomas holds a 

bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Southern University at Baton Rouge and a master’s 

degree in business administration from Our Lady of the Lake University in San Antonio. He is a 

registered professional engineer in the state of Texas.

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two Resident Inspectors. Thomas joins 

Senior Resident Inspector Doug Dodson at the site. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public.

 The Wolf Creek Resident Inspectors can be reached at 620-364-8653.
### §§1575, 1576. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1575, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title V, §505, as added June 28, 1948, ch. 688, §1, 62 Stat. 1062; amended Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73; Oct. 26, 1951, ch. 577, §2, 65 Stat. 648, related to relinquishment of Government's rights in temporary housing on campuses or other educational lands.

Section 1576, acts Aug. 24, 1949, ch. 506, title II, §201, 63 Stat. 659; Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, ch. VIII, title II, §201, 64 Stat. 723, which was not repeated in the Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952, act Aug. 31, 1951, ch. 376, 65 Stat. 268, provided that application for relinquishment had to be filed by Dec. 30, 1950. Section was enacted as a part of act Aug. 24, 1949, popularly known as the Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1951, and not as a part of title V of the Lanham Public War Housing Act, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, as added June 23, 1945, ch. 192, 59 Stat. 260, which comprises this subchapter.
Part 5334 - Major System Acquisition       DAFFARS PART 5334 Knowledge Center          *Revised: June 2023*                                       Subpart 5334.2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM                                                         5334.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause                                                                             Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS                                                         5334.7002 Policy    Subpart 5334.2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM               5334.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause       If an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) waiver is obtained in accordance with the Adaptive Acquisition Framework Document Identification Tool (AAFDID) EVMS Application Requirements Table, contracting officers may omit the use of EVMS provisions and clauses prescribed for use in DFARS 234.203. The approved EVMS waiver must be included in the contract file.Subpart 5334.70 – ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS AS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS               5334.7002 Policy       (d)(4) See MP5301.601(a)(i).
### §10266. Staff

#### (a) Clerical staff

(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Chairman may appoint and fix the compensation of such clerical staff as may be necessary to discharge the responsibilities of the Board.

(2) Clerical staff shall be appointed subject to the provisions of title 5 governing appointments in the competitive service, and shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.

#### (b) Professional staff

(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Chairman may appoint and fix the compensation of such professional staff as may be necessary to discharge the responsibilities of the Board.

(2) Not more than 10 professional staff members may be appointed under this subsection.

(3) Professional staff members may be appointed without regard to the provisions of title 5 governing appointments in the competitive service, and may be paid without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates, except that no individual so appointed may receive pay in excess of the annual rate of basic pay payable for GS–18 of the General Schedule.

(Pub. L. 97–425, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title III], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–121; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5051, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–249.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–202 and Pub. L. 100–203 added identical sections.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Isaac B. Hosford, Deceased, Respondent. James M. Engle et al., Appellants-Respondents; Richard W. Dammann, as Special Guardian for Michael J. Miller, Respondent-Appellant; Peter K. Engle et al., *1027Respondents.

Decree, so far as appealed from, affirmed. No opinion. Present —■ Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. Breitel, J., dissents in part in the following memorandum: The words “ remaining grandchildren ” as used in the will, read in the context of the will, were not intended to exclude after-born grandchildren. *Matter of Watson*(262 N. Y. 284) is distinguishable. The language used in the will in that case differs from the language used here. It referred to “said surviving grandchildren” and unquestionably the word “said” related back to the antecedent phrase which was limited to those surviving at the death of the testatrix. The decree should be modified to provide that all of testator’s grandchildren alive at the death of any one of them are “remaining grandchildren” within the terms of the will and, as so modified, the decree should be affirmed. [203 Misc. 146.]
#### § 148.2 When the Act applies.

The Act applies to any covered adjudicatory proceeding pending before the Commission on or after October 1, 1981. This includes proceedings begun before October 1, 1981, if final Commission action has not been taken before that date. Awards may be sought for fees and other expenses incurred before October 1, 1981, in any such covered proceeding.

[51 FR 18880, May 23, 1986]
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure the material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
controls over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Joni K TroskaJoni K TroskaChief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Prostate problems.**
 
2005 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:P 94/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001099607
 
July 16, 2019
June 6, 2011

Via email: expartecommunications@hg.doe.gov Daniel Cohen, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Office ofthe General Counsel Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585-0121

RE: Docket Number EERE 2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN Number 1904-AC@# Dear Dan: During a discussion on Wednesday May25,2011 between NEMA Lighting Division members and DOE staffto discuss the DOE's certification and enforcement program, a NEMA member, Cheryl English ofAcuity Brands, Inc., made some comments relevant to NEMA's May 19, 2011 request for an extension ofthe effective date for the CCE Rule as it applies to metal halide lamp ballasts and fixtures thatwere not part of NEMA's May 19, 2011 letter. This letter is to disclose the substance ofthat ex parte communication.

Ms. English expressed the following additional point. If metal halide luminaire manufacturers
are compelled to remove products from distribution in commerce by July 5, 2011 because they are not able to comply with the CCE Rule forthe reasons stated in NEMA's letterof May 19, 2011, a problem is created with respect existing orders and contracts that have been in place for many months. The luminaire manufacturers are unable to modifytheirordersystems in time to restrict the sale ofproducts that coverthe breadth ofmetal halide luminaires.



### NationalElectrical ManufacturersAssociation www.nema.org
1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752 Rosslyn, VA 22209 (703) 841-3200 FAX (703) 841-5900 

# V?;/17rs

,

# C~~
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1561-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1561-DR), dated September 26, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 17, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective November 17, 2004. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-26701 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




Exhibit 10.63




AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY

2005 STOCK PLAN




Amendment No. 1




Adopted: May 22, 2007




Effective May 22, 2007, the American Reprographics Company 2005 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) is amended
as follows:




	1.	 	Section 8 of the Plan, entitled “Non-Employee Directors’ Nonstatutory Stock Option Program,”
in restated its entirety to read as follows:






	 	8.	 	Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Award Program. 






Without any further action by the Board, automatic grants of Restricted Stock Awards
will be made under the Plan in accordance with this Section 8 to Non-Employee Directors who
meet the criteria specified in Section 8(a). All Restricted Stock Awards granted under this
Section 8 will be in such form as may be approved by the Board, subject to the provisions of
the Plan and Section 8.




(a) Non-Discretionary Grants. Without any further action of the Board, on the date of
each Annual Meeting, commencing with the Annual Meeting in 2007, each person who is then a
Non-Employee Director will be automatically granted a Restricted Stock Award for a number of
 shares of Common Stock having a then Fair Market Value equal to $60,000, which award will
vest at a rate of 1/12 per month after the date of the Annual Meeting following the
Non-Employee Director’s completion of Continuous Service.




(b) Restricted Stock Award Provisions. Each Restricted Stock Award granted under this
Section 8 will include (through incorporation by reference in the Restricted Stock Award or
otherwise) the substance of each of the provisions of Section 7(d).




	2.	 	Section 2(u) of the Plan is restated in its entirety to read as follows:






(u) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of the Common Stock determined as
follows:




(i) If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or traded on the
New York Stock Exchange, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock
will be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were
reported) as quoted on such exchange (or the exchange or market with the greatest volume of
trading in the Common Stock) on the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street
Journal or such other source as the Board deems reliable.




(ii) In the absence of such markets for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall
be determined by the Board in good faith.