alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 204.31 Excluded debts or claims. This regulation does not apply to: ( a ) Debts or claims arising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended (26 U.S.C. 1), or the tariff laws of the United States.
( b ) Any case where collection of a debt by salary offset is explicitly provided for or prohibited by another statute, such as travel advances in 5 U.S.C. 5705 and employee training expenses in 5 U.S.C. 4108.
[58 FR 38520, July 19, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 54131, Oct. 26, 2001]
No. 89-6548.

#### Harrison *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Meeting Summary and Slides for Fuel Cycle Cyber Security Public Meeting at NIST Presentation and Technical Discussion on Proposed Part 37 Rulemaking and Guidance

Accession Number: ML15308A506

Date Released: Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML15308A503 - 10/22/2015 Summary of Public Meeting for the Presentation on the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cyber Security and Discussions on the Technical Approach for the Proposed Cyber Security Rulemaking and Related Guidance. (6 page(s), 11/24/2015)
    - ML15308A511 - Enclosure 2 NIST Presentation for NRC Public Meeting - October 22, 2015. (37 page(s), 11/24/2015)
    - ML15308A513 - Enclosure 3 NRC Public Meeting Slides - October 22, 2015, Re Technical Discussion on the Fuel Cyber Security Proposed Rulemaking. (36 page(s), 11/24/2015)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Rayford W. Alley et al., Copartners Doing Business as Alley, Cole, Grimes & Friedman, Respondents, v. Walz *&*Krenzer, Inc., Appellant.

Memorandum: A sum due for attorneys, services may properly be the subject of an account stated. *(Rodkinson*v. *Haecker,*248 N. Y. 480.) However, the omission to object to an account rendered raises only a rebuttable inference that the debtor consents to such account. *(Lockwood*v. *Thorne,*18 N. Y. 285.) A question of fact on this issue exists in this case. Also, the facts set forth in the opposing affidavit of the secretary-treasurer of the defendant corporation raise a triable issue of fact as to the terms of plaintiffs’ employment. For these reasons, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment should have been denied. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to recover fees for legal services. The order struck out defendant’s answer and directed summary judgment.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.
### §15344. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 15344 was editorially reclassified as section 20944 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### SUBCHAPTER X—MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT PREVENTION
5317.7505 Limitations on Price Increases       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5317.75 — ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS
Ex-10.3



 





Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT TO THE LUMINEX CORPORATION

2006 MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Luminex Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Luminex Corporation 2006 Management
Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to revise the provisions in Section 8 of the Plan
regarding adjustments to the shares of the Company’s common stock, or awards granted under the Plan
in connection with a recapitalization (or other similar event).



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Board hereby amends and restates Section
8 of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:



     8. Dilution and Other Adjustments.



In the event of any unusual and non-recurring transactions, including an unusual or
non-recurring dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of an extraordinary cash
dividend or a dividend of Shares, other securities or other property), merger,
reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock split, or other change in corporate
structure affecting the Shares, an equitable and proportionate substitution or adjustment
shall be made in the aggregate number of Shares that may be distributed as Restricted Shares
under the Plan and the number of Restricted Shares outstanding under the Plan; provided,
however, that the number of Shares thus subject to the Plan shall always be a whole number.



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized,
empowered and directed in the name and on behalf of the Company to take or cause to be taken all
such further actions and to execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered all such
further agreements, instruments and documents in the name and on behalf of the Company and to incur
and pay all such fees and expenses as in their judgment shall be necessary or advisable in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated by, and carry out fully the intent and purpose of, the
preceding resolutions and each of them.



3
#### § 201.59 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the Chief Financial Officer of the Commission a copy of the Commission's final decision granting the award, accompanied by a sworn statement that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. The Commission will pay the amount awarded to the applicant as authorized by law, unless judicial review of the award has been sought by the applicant.

[54 FR 53052, Dec. 27, 1989, as amended at 76 FR 60372, Sept. 29, 2011]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3943 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3943

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2012

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      (Acetic acid,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        cyano-[3-[(6-                                                      31/2014.......
                        methoxy-2-
                        benzothiazolyl)am
                        ino]amino]-1H-
                        isoindol-1-
                        ylidene]-, pentyl
                        ester) (CAS No.
                        173285-74-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.11.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# AC **C CPI Saf** **et y**  **& Health Tr** **aining Thr** **ough December**  **2011**

**Nov ember 2011**  **December 2011 To**  **tal Through December**  **2011** Job Description Fully Complete Fully Complete Fully Complete In Progress

Instructor Online Instructor Online Instructor Online Started, not finished Applicator 5 34 0 58 93 661 324 Helper 28 109 44



## Te **st Scor** **es thr** **ough December**  **2011 100%**  **90 -**  **99% 70**  **- 89%**  Pe rcent achieving test scores 45% 46% 9% Helper 1 6 0 4 28 109 44 Other 6 118 10 61 165 1014 413 Supervisor 8 30 0 43 153 449 310 To tal **20 188**  **10 166**  **439 2233**  **1091** 

## To **tal Students Fully Completed Thr** **ough December**  **2011 To**  **tal Students Started**  **or Finished Thr** **ough December**  **2011 2672**  **3763**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert L. Flower, Appellant.

The record does not establish any violation of section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. *People*v. *Elliott,*66 App. Div. 179, affd. 172 N. Y. 146.) We are of the opinion, also, that the court’s charge as to the effect to be given character evidence was in substantial compliance with the rule stated in *People*v. *Trimarchi*(231 N. Y. 263, 266). In any event, there was no exception to that instruction; and even if it be assumed that it was erroneous, a new trial is not necessitated under section 527 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. (Cf. *People*v. *Robbins,*278 App. Div. 592, affd. 302 N. Y. 885.) The other claims of error advanced by defendant have been examined and are similarly without merit. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:34:06-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
 
 
 CNA Extends Term of Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Dino E. Robusto
 
 CHICAGO, August 10, 2020 - CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE: CNA) has entered into a new employment agreement with its Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Dino E. Robusto, that extends the term of his employment  through 2024. Robusto has served as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company since December 2016.
 
 Under Robusto’s leadership, CNA has developed an enduring underwriting culture characterized by deep industry and product line specialization in each business unit. Together with a highly collaborative and expert leadership team, CNA has been able to attract, develop and retain top talent across all disciplines within the organization.
 
 During his tenure, the Company’s underlying P&C combined ratio performance has improved each year. CNA has also become a meaningful solution provider to broker and agent partners across a broad commercial spectrum evidenced by growth accelerating each year.
 
 CNA has maintained an extremely strong balance sheet and produced Core Income of $2.7B in the past three years, which was the highest three-year period over the past 20 years. This has led to an increased total dividend being paid to shareholders each year. CNA’s improved performance under Robusto has been recognized by various rating agencies including Moody’s in 2017 and Standard & Poor’s, which upgraded CNA to A+ in 2019.
 
 “I am extremely proud of the significant progress our entire team has made across our U.S. and International offices, and I am grateful for the opportunity to lead this talented organization to higher levels of success.” Robusto said.
 
 About CNA
 CNA is one of the largest U.S. commercial property and casualty insurance companies. CNA provides a broad range of standard and specialized property and casualty insurance products and services for businesses and professionals in the U.S., Canada and Europe, backed by 120 years of experience and more than $45 billion of assets. For more information about CNA, visit our website at www.cna.com .
 
 Press Contacts
 
 Brandon Davis
 CNA
 brandon.davis@cna.com
 312-822-5885
 
 CNA Newsroom
 newsroom@cna.com
 312-822-5167
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH ALLEN SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1)

Submitted: December 12, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Allen Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew John Ewalt, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Shayna Amanda 

Hutchins, James Patrick McDonald, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Allen Smith seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

deny Smith’s motion to produce a grand jury concurrence form and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

Under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, As Amended





I, Robert E. Lawless, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of NexCore Healthcare Capital Corp;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 24, 2013

By: /s/ Robert E. Lawless
Robert E. Lawless
Chief Financial Officer
### §14197. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXVII, §270007, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2095, which related to powers of the Commission, was omitted as obsolete.
### §15871. Coordination of geothermal leasing and permitting on Federal lands

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after August 8, 2005, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall enter into and submit to Congress a memorandum of understanding in accordance with this section, the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (as amended by this Act) [30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.], and other applicable laws, regarding coordination of leasing and permitting for geothermal development of public lands and National Forest System lands under their respective jurisdictions.

#### (b) Lease and permit applications

The memorandum of understanding shall—

(1) establish an administrative procedure for processing geothermal lease applications, including lines of authority, steps in application processing, and time limits for application procession;

(2) establish a 5-year program for geothermal leasing of lands in the National Forest System, and a process for updating that program every 5 years; and

(3) establish a program for reducing the backlog of geothermal lease application pending on January 1, 2005, by 90 percent within the 5-year period beginning on August 8, 2005, including, as necessary, by issuing leases, rejecting lease applications for failure to comply with the provisions of the regulations under which they were filed, or determining that an original applicant (or the applicant's assigns, heirs, or estate) is no longer interested in pursuing the lease application.

#### (c) Data retrieval system

The memorandum of understanding shall establish a joint data retrieval system that is capable of tracking lease and permit applications and providing to the applicant information as to their status within the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture, including an estimate of the time required for administrative action.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §225, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 665.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Geothermal Steam Act of 1970, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 91–581, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1566, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§1001 et seq.) of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 30 and Tables.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 109–58, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 594, known as the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and repealed numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 15801 of this title and Tables.
### §16254. Regional bioeconomy development grants

#### (a) In general

Using amounts made available under subsection (g), the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall make available on a competitive basis grants to eligible entities described in subsection (b) for the purposes described in subsection (c).

#### (b) Eligible entities

An entity eligible for a grant under this section is any regional bioeconomy development association, agricultural or energy trade association, or Land Grant institution that—

(1) proposes to use the grant for the purposes described in subsection (c); and

(2) has not previously received a grant under this section.

#### (c) Regional bioeconomy development association grant purposes

A grant made under this section shall be used to support and promote the growth and development of the bioeconomy within the region served by the eligible entity, through coordination, education, outreach, and other endeavors by the eligible entity.

#### (d) Matching funds

#### (1) In general

Grant recipients shall provide matching non-Federal funds equal to the amount of the grant received.

#### (2) Expenditure

Matching funds shall be expended in advance of grant funding, so that for every dollar of grant that is advanced, an equal amount of matching funds shall have been funded prior to submitting the request for reimbursement.

#### (e) Administration

The Secretary shall establish such administrative requirements for grants under this section, including requirements for applications for the grants, as the Secretary considers appropriate.

#### (f) Amount

A grant made under this section shall not exceed $500,000.

#### (g) Authorizations of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to make grants under this section—

(1) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; and

(2) such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2015.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §945, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 882.)
### §1490j. Conditions on rent increases in projects receiving assistance under other provisions of law

The Secretary may not approve any increase in rental payments, with respect to units in which the tenants are paying rentals in excess of 30 per centum of their incomes, in any project which is assisted under section 1484, 1485, or 1487 of this title and under section 1490a(a)(1)(B) of this title unless the project owner is receiving, or has applied for (within the most recent period of 180 days prior to the effective date of such increase), assistance payments with respect to such project under section 1490a(a)(2)(A) or 1490a(a)(5) of this title or section 1437f of this title.

(July 15, 1949, ch. 338, title V, §530, as added Pub. L. 96–399, title V, §509, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1670; amended Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title V, §517(d)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1248; Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §599C(e)(2)(G), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2663.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–276 substituted "assistance payments with respect to such project under section 1490a(a)(2)(A) or 1490a(a)(5) of this title" for "rental assistance payments with respect to such project under section 1490a(a)(2)(A) of this title".

1983—Pub. L. 98–181 substituted "30 per centum" for "25 per centum".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–181 effective six months after Nov. 30, 1983, or upon the earlier promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 517(f) of Pub. L. 98–181, set out as a note under section 1490a of this title.
### §16762. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–155, title V, §502, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2928, which related to transition from Space Shuttle program to Crew Exploration Vehicle, Crew Launch Vehicle, and heavy-lift launch vehicle, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 70501 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.