alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-044 October 27, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO CONDUCT SPECIAL INSPECTION AT HUMBOLDT BAY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a special inspection into the missing

fuel rod segments at the Humboldt Bay nuclear plant, near Eureka, Calif. Pacific Gas & Electric

Co., owns the plant, which was permanently shut down in 1976.

PG&E officials notified the NRC on Aug. 17 that they were unable to locate three 18-

inch sections of a spent fuel rod that records show was removed from the reactor in 1968. The

utility is searching the less accessible areas of the spent fuel pool, reviewing documents and

interviewing former plant workers in an effort to locate the missing fuel rod segments, an effort

that could continue past the end of the year. It is considered highly unlikely that the material is in

an area to which the public would have access, and is most likely either in the spent fuel pool or

has been sent to a licensed disposal facility.

The NRC staff has decided to conduct a special inspection because of the scope and

complexity of the utility’s investigation, the need to evaluate PG&E’s radioactive materials

accountability and control program and to identify any potential generic implications. 

“As stated at our Sept. 29 public meeting with PG&E, utilities are responsible for

maintaining strict control and accountability of radioactive materials, and we plan a thorough

review of their response to this incident and the quality of their programs,” NRC Region IV

Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said.

The NRC has had an inspector on site observing utility activities at various times during

July, August and September. The results of those inspections will be described in a report

expected to be issued within the next two weeks. 

The Special Inspection Team will continue this focused NRC oversight with one Region

IV employee and two specialists from NRC Headquarters. The team will arrive on site this

weekend and begin its inspection on Nov. 1. Team members will visit the site periodically

during the next several months. NRC plans to complete the Special Inspection by January.
The team is expected to issue a report within 45 days of completing its inspection. A

copy of the charter authorizing the Special Inspection is available from the NRC Public

Document Room by calling 1-800-397-4209.

###
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00523

- CR

Jose MORENO

, Appellant

v. The STATE of The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. NM182574 Honorable Andrew Carruthers

, Magistrate Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 28, 2013

DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Jose Moreno filed a pro se notice of appeal from the Magistrate’s July 15, 2013 ruling that

Moreno is competent to stand trial. A competency hearing is an ancillary proceeding, and a

competency order is not a final judgment. Morales v. State , 801 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. App.

— Dallas

1990), aff ’ d , 830 S.W.2d 139, 140 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (per curiam). A preliminary finding

that defendant is competent to stand trial is not appealable until after the trial on the merits. Id. ;

Celani v. State , 940 S.W.2d 327, 329 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, pet. ref’d).04

- 13

- 00523

- CR

On August 5, 2013, we ordered app ellant to show cause why his appeal should not be

dismissed f or lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s tr ial attorney has filed a response in which he

concurs that there has been no appealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdictio n.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
Part 5346 - Quality Assurance

DAFFARS PART 5346 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5346.1 – GENERAL

5346.103 Contracting Office Responsibilities

Subpart 5346.3 – [RESERVED]

5346.311 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement.

Subpart 5346.1 – GENERAL

5346.103 Contracting Office Responsibilities

See MP5346.103 for Department of the Air Force requirements regarding contracting office

responsibilities for the Quality Assurance Program.

Subpart 5346.3 – [RESERVED]

5346.311 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement.

Agencies shall establish procedures for determining when higher-level contract quality requirements

are necessary, for determining the risk (both the likelihood and the impact) of nonconformance, and

for advising the contracting officer about which higher-level standards should be applied and

included in the solicitation and contract. Requiring compliance with higher-level quality standards is

necessary in solicitations and contracts for complex or critical items (see FAR 46.203) or when the

technical requirements of the contract require -

(1) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process controls, testing and inspection; or

(2) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control,

and advanced metrology,

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard(s) listed below.

___________________________[Contracting Officer shall insert the title, number (if any), date, and

tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards.]

(b) The Contractor shall include applicable requirements of the higher-level quality standard(s)

listed in paragraph (a) of this clause and the requirement to flow down such standards, as

applicable, to lower-tier subcontracts, in-
(1) Any subcontract for critical and complex items (see FAR 46.203(b) and (c)); or

(2) When the technical requirements of a subcontract require-

(i) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process control, testing, and inspection; or

(ii) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control,

and advanced metrology.

(c) See FAR 46.311
### §13494. Prototype demonstration of advanced nuclear reactor technology

#### (a) Solicitation of proposals

Within 3 years after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall solicit proposals for carrying out the preliminary engineering design of not more than 2 prototype advanced nuclear reactor technologies developed by the Department of Energy, other than advanced light water reactor technologies, necessary to support a decision on whether to recommend construction of a prototype demonstration reactor with the characteristics described in section 13493(a) of this title. Proposals submitted under this subsection shall be for modular design concepts of sufficient size to address requirements related to the certification of a standardized design.

#### (b) Recommendation to Congress

(1) Not later than September 30, 1998, the Secretary shall submit to Congress recommendations on whether to build one or more prototype demonstration reactors under this section. Such recommendations shall—

(A) specify a preferred technology or technologies;

(B) include detailed information on milestones for construction and operation;

(C) include an estimate of the funding requirements; and

(D) specify the extent and type of non-Federal financial support anticipated.

In developing the recommendations under this paragraph, the Secretary shall provide for public notice and an opportunity for comment, and shall solicit the views of the Commission and other parties with technical expertise the Secretary considers useful in the development of such recommendations.

(2) The prototype demonstration program under this section shall be carried out to the maximum extent practicable with private sector funding. At least 50 percent of the funding for such program shall be non-Federal funding. The extent of non-Federal cost sharing proposed for any demonstration project shall be a criterion for the selection of the project.

#### (c) Selection of technology

Any technology selected by the Secretary for recommendation for prototype demonstration under this section shall to the maximum extent possible exhibit the characteristics set forth in section 13493(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2124, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3084.)
§ 309.20 Labeling requirements for new covered vehicles. ( a ) Before offering a new covered vehicle for acquisition to consumers, manufacturers shall affix or cause to be affixed, and new vehicle dealers shall maintain or cause to be maintained, fuel economy labels as required by 40 CFR part 600. For dual fueled vehicles, such labels must include driving range information for alternative fuel and gasoline operation and be otherwise consistent with provisions in 40 CFR part 600.
( b ) If an aftermarket conversion system is installed on a vehicle by a person other than the manufacturer prior to such vehicle's being acquired by a consumer, the manufacturer shall provide that person with the vehicle's fuel economy label prepared pursuant to 40 CFR part 600 and ensure that new fuel economy vehicle labels are affixed to such vehicles as required by paragraph (a) of this section.
[78 FR 23835, Apr. 23, 2013]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Frattaroli, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vaso Active
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

May 13, 2005
By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
Acting Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.57
 kol i n
 TAIWAN KOLIN CO., LTD
10FL,86,SEC,1 CHUNG CHING S.RD.
TAIPEI ,TAIWAN
  
   1.
    
    Shipment terms between Taiwan Kolin, Co., LTD (Kolin) and Syntax Groups
Corporation (Syntax) are DDP Syntax Warehouse(s), which means Delivered Duty Paid to
Syntaxs warehouse(s) from the beginning invoice.2.
    
    Because the shipment terms are DDP, Kolin is liable for all duty payments.3.
    
    To expedite delivery to Syntax, Kolin has requested and Syntax has agreed to
pay the duties on behalf of Kolin.4.
    
    Kolin agrees to allow Syntax to offset the duty payments made by Syntax on
Kolins behalf against Syntaxs account payable balance with Kolin.5.
    
    Syntax will provide a summary of duty payments made on Kolins behalf on a
monthly basis.
  /s/ Roger Kao

Roger KaoTaiwan Kolin Co., LTD




---



##### 



kol i n
  
    
 /s/ Roger Kao

Roger KaoVice
President
### SUBCHAPTER VI—NATIONAL OLDER AMERICANS VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
### §1441a. National housing goals

#### (a) Congressional findings and reaffirmation of goals

The Congress finds that the supply of the Nation's housing is not increasing rapidly enough to meet the national housing goal, established in the Housing Act of 1949 [42 U.S.C. 1441 et seq.], of the "realization as soon as feasible of the goal of a decent home and a suitable living environment for every American family". The Congress reaffirms this national housing goal and determines that it can be substantially achieved within the next decade by the construction or rehabilitation of twenty-six million housing units, six million of these for low and moderate income families.

#### (b) Additional Congressional findings

The Congress further finds that policies designed to contribute to the achievement of the national housing goal have not directed sufficient attention and resources to the preservation of existing housing and neighborhoods, that the deterioration and abandonment of housing for the Nation's lower income families has accelerated over the last decade, and that this acceleration has contributed to neighborhood disintegration and has partially negated the progress toward achieving the national housing goal which has been made primarily through new housing construction.

#### (c) Congressional declaration of purposes

The Congress declares that if the national housing goal is to be achieved, a greater effort must be made to encourage the preservation of existing housing and neighborhoods through such measures as housing preservation, moderate rehabilitation, and improvements in housing management and maintenance, in conjunction with the provision of adequate municipal services. Such an effort should concentrate, to a greater extent than it has in the past, on housing and neighborhoods where deterioration is evident but has not yet become acute.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XVI, §1601, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 601; Pub. L. 93–383, title VIII, §801(1), (2), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 721.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Housing Act of 1949, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 15, 1949, ch. 338, 63 Stat. 413, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1441 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1441 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Housing Act of 1949 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–383 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
April 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations

To whom it may concern,

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act)

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Premier Real Estate Services

, a Real Estate Broker, hereby applies for an

exemption from the listed Federal Aviation R egulations ("FARs") to allow them to operate a
small Unmanned Aircraft System ("sUAS) under the conditions and limitations set forth in this

Petition.

The requested exemption would permit Premier Real Estate Services to operate the DJI S

Phantom 2 Vision+ primarily to conduct aerial photography and videography for homeowners,

realtors, home builders, h ome contractors, and/or home inspectors for real estate marketing.

Premier Real Estate Services states that all sUAS flights will occur over private or controlled

access property will do so with the property owner ’ s consent and knowledge and that only

people who have consented or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where videography will

take place.

Noel Johnson

Broker/Owner

Premier Real Estate Services

550 25 th Ave N

St. Cloud, MN 56303

(320) 259

- 4554

Noel@PremierHomeSearch.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Grace Balzano, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
#### § 156.3 Contract market program for enforcement.

A contract market must, as part of its responsibilities pursuant to the Act and § 1.51, demonstrate effective use of broker association registration information to monitor the trading activity of broker associations and their members for potential abuse and to secure compliance with all other contract market bylaws, rules, regulations and resolutions which may pertain to such associations or their members.
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOSH, WI 54903-3086 • Tel 920.426.6522 • Fax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG

 

February 5, 2014

DOT Docket Management System

400 7th Street, SW, Room PL 401

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Fuel Exemption: Docket Number FAA-2001-9352, Exemption No. 10159

To Whom It May Concern:

EAA (the Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an 

international membership of more than 180,000 people in more than 100 nations, EAA brings 

together pilots, aircraft owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of 

Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a 

commitment to aviation’s future.

The International Aerobatic Club (IAC) was formed in 1970 for the purpose of formalizing 

the Experimental Aircraft Association’s (EAA) Precision Flying Division into a true 

membership organization, to write the rules and to set up the corporate structure to promote 

"grass roots" aerobatics. 

IAC successfully petitioned the FAA for an exemption from §§ 91.151(a)(1) and 91.9(b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowing IAC members to carry less than the 

visual flight rules (VFR) fuel requirements under certain conditions and be exempted from 

carrying the aircraft flight manual during aerobatic competition and aerobatic practice flights. 

The resulting exemption is recognized as Exemption 10159. 

This petition is being submitted to renew the current exemption, No. 10159A. The conditions and 

reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition dated March 18, 

1979 and recognized previously as Exemption 2689 and Exemption 5745, remain unchanged. 

IAC requests this exemption be renewed for a three year period.

If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at 920-426-6574.

Sincerely,

Patricia Deimer-Steineke

Manager, IAC
Part 5308 - Required Sources of Supplies and

Services

DAFFARS PART 5308 Knowledge Center

2019 Edition

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5308.4 - FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES

5308.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules

5308.405-3 Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA)

5308.405-6 Limited Sources

Subpart 5308.7 - ACQUISITION FROM NONPROFIT AGENCIES EMPLOYING PEOPLE WHO ARE

BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

5308.705 Procedures

5308.707 Prices.

Subpart 5308.4 - FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES

5308.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules

(h)(3)(ii)(C) See MP5301.601(a)(i). for approval of a T&M/LH order with a total performance period,

including options, that is more than three years.

5308.405-3 Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA)

(a)(3)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i). for approval to award a single-award Blanket Purchase Agreement

with an estimated value exceeding $100 million (including any options).

5308.405-6 Limited Sources

(b)(3)(ii)(C) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for approval of a written determination that access through e-Buy

is not in Government's interest.

(a)-(d) Justification Approvals

See DAFFARS 5306.304 (a) for the approving officials for proposed orders or BPAs using the limited

or sole source justification at FAR 8.405-6. See the tailorable Limited Sources Justification and
Approval (J&A) template. See DAFFARS 5306.303-1-90 for “Bridge Actions.”

Subpart 5308.7 - ACQUISITION FROM NONPROFIT

AGENCIES EMPLOYING PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR

SEVERELY DISABLED

5308.705 Procedures

Refer to the AbilityOne Procurement Guidebook for acquiring products and services under 41

U.S.C., chapter 85 from nonprofit agencies employing people who are blind or severely disabled.

5308.707 Prices

Contracting Officers are required to obtain the Fair Market Price (FMP) Determination from the U.S.

Ability One Commission prior to contract award. Please note that the self-inspection program at

DAFFARS MP5301.601-91 reviews compliance with this requirement for contracts awarded under

the AbilityOne program.

5308.707 Prices.

Contracting Officers are required to obtain the Fair Market Price (FMP) Determination from the U.S.

Ability One Commission prior to contract award. Please note that the self-inspection program at

DAFFARS MP5301.601-91 reviews compliance with this requirement for contracts awarded under

the AbilityOne program.
Part 5335 - Research and Development Contracting       DAFFARS PART 5335 Knowledge Center          *Revised: June 2023*                                       5335.015-70 Special Use Allowances for Research Facilities Acquired by Educational Institutions                                          5335.070-1 Indemnification Under Research and Development Contracts    5335.015-70  Special Use Allowances for Research Facilities Acquired by Educational Institutions       (c) See MP5301.601(a)(i).          (d)(3)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).5335.070-1 Indemnification Under Research and Development Contracts       (a) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for approval authority of requests for indemnification for unusually hazardous risks under 10 U.S.C. 3861.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Dioguardi, Appellant, against City of New York (Department of Parks), Respondent. State Industrial Board Respondent.

All concur.
### **CHAPTER 49—NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS**

Sec.
3931.
Congressional statement of purpose.
3932.
Creation of corporations.
3933.
Organization of corporation.
3934.
Board of Directors; membership; appointment; term.
3935.
Financing the corporation.
3936.
Purposes and powers of corporation.
3937.
National housing partnership.
3938.
Annual report of corporation; audit of accounts.
3939.
Applicability of antitrust laws.
3940.
Reservation of right to repeal, alter, or amend chapter.
3941.
State or local taxation or regulation; access to judicial process.