alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report")
pursuant to Rule 15d-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep
Inc. (the "Company"), I, Steven Crowther, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
78o(d); and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ Steven Crowther
                                      ------------------------------------------
Dated:  October 12, 2005              Steven Crowther
                                      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect to
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By: /s/  Gary Nickele               By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
        ---------------------------         ---------------------------
        Gary Nickele                        Gailen J. Hull
        Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Principal Accounting Officer
### §14093. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 14093 was editorially reclassified as section 12553 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ansumana Sesay, Appellant.

[820 NYS2d 800]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered on or about November 12, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Audrey Myers, on Behalf of Herself and a Minor Child, Respondent, against Sam Tuttle, Doing Business as Liberty Machine Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 543.]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Exercise and physical activity**
 
2006 | 2012 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3861:EX 3/3/
Item Number:0447-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001100919
 
July 8, 2019
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

Under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, As Amended



I, Gregory C. Venn, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of NexCore Healthcare Capital Corp;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 24, 2013

By:  /s/ Gregory C. Venn
Gregory C. Venn
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caliber Energy, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  David  Naylor,
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     David Naylor
David Naylor
Treasurer, CFO and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)



May 6, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T22:00:26-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 

March 25, 2016

 IN RESPONSE, PLEASE 

REFER TO: M160315 

 

MEMORANDUM TO: Victor M. McCree 

 Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Andrew L. Bates, Acting Secretary /RA/ 

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS – BRIEFING ON POWER REACTOR 

DECOMMISSIONING RULEMAKING, 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, 

MARCH 15, 2016, COMMISSIONERS’ CONFERENCE ROOM, 

ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN 

TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 

The Commission was briefed by the NRC staff, states, industry, and non-governmental 

organizations on the current decommissioning framework and experience to date; and the 

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Power Reactor Decommissioning. 

There were no requirements identified for staff action. 

cc: Chairman Burns 

 Commissioner Svinicki 

 Commissioner Ostendorff 

 Commissioner Baran 

 OGC 

 CFO 

 OCA 

 OIG 

 OPA 

 ODs, RAs, ACRS, ASLBP (via E-Mail) 

 PDR
§ 190.17 Calculation of net equity. ( a ) *Net equity-separate capacities and calculations.* ( 1 ) If a member of the clearing organization clears trades in commodity contracts through a commodity contract account carried by the debtor as a customer account for the benefit of the clearing member's public customers and separately through a house account, the clearing member shall be treated as having customer claims against the debtor in separate capacities with respect to the customer account and house account at the clearing organization, and by account class. A member shall be treated as part of the public customer class with respect to claims based on any commodity customer accounts carried as “customer accounts” by the clearing organization for the benefit of the member's public customers, and as part of the non-public customer class with respect to claims based on its house account.
( 2 ) Net equity shall be calculated separately for each separate customer capacity in which the clearing member has a claim against the debtor, *i.e.,* separately by the member's customer account and house account and by account class.
( b ) *Net equity—application of debtor's loss allocation rules and procedures.* ( 1 ) ( i ) The calculation of a clearing member's net equity claim shall include the full application of the debtor's loss allocation rules and procedures, including the default rules and procedures referred to in § 39.16 and, if applicable, § 39.35 of this chapter.
( ii ) The calculation in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section will include, with respect to the clearing member's house account, any assessments or similar loss allocation arrangements provided for under those rules and procedures that were not called for before the filing date, or, if called for, have not been paid. Such loss allocation arrangements shall be applied to the extent necessary to address losses arising from default by clearing members.
( 2 ) Appropriate adjustments shall be made to the net equity claims of the clearing members that are so entitled under the following circumstances: Where the debtor's loss allocation rules and procedures would entitle clearing members to additional payments of cash or other property due to— ( i ) Portions of mutualized default resources that are prefunded, or assessed and collected, but in either event not used; or
( ii ) The debtor's recoveries on claims against others (including, but not limited to, recoveries on claims against clearing members who have defaulted on their obligations to the debtor).
( c ) *Net equity—general.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, net equity shall be calculated in the manner provided in § 190.08, to the extent applicable.
( d ) *Calculation of funded balance. Funded balance* means a clearing member's pro rata share of customer property other than member property (for accounts for a clearing member's customer accounts) or member property (for a clearing member's house accounts) with respect to each account class available for distribution to customers of the same customer class, calculated in the manner provided in § 190.08(c) to the extent applicable.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 231 (Thursday, December 2, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-26524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18827; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-53]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Hannibal, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Hannibal, MO.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 8, 2004 
(69 FR 60286). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on November 16, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-26524 Filed 12-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 301.36 Sectional fur products. ( a ) Where a fur product is composed of two or more sections containing different animal furs the required information with respect to each section shall be separately set forth in labeling, invoicing or advertising; as for example: Dyed Rabbit Fur origin: France Trimming: Dyed Mouton-processed Lamb Fur origin: Argentina or Body: Dyed Kolinsky Fur origin: Russia Tail: Dyed Mink Fur origin: Canada
( b ) The provisions of this section shall not be interpreted so as to require the disclosure of very small amounts of different animal furs added to complete a fur product or skin such as the ears, snoot, or under part of the jaw.
#### § 460.4 When the rules in this part apply.

You must follow the rules in this part each time you import, manufacture, distribute, sell, install, promote, or label home insulation. You must follow them each time you prepare, approve, place, or pay for home insulation labels, fact sheets, ads, or other promotional materials for consumer use. You must also follow them each time you supply anyone covered by this part with written information that is to be used in labels, fact sheets, ads, or other promotional materials for consumer use. Testing labs must follow the rules unless the industry members tell them, in writing, that labels, fact sheets, ads, or other promotional materials for home insulation will not be based on the test results. You must follow the requirements in § 460.22 each time you make an R-value claim for non-insulation products marketed in whole or in part to reduce residential energy use by slowing heat flow.

[84 FR 20788, May 13, 2019]
Subpart 5325.1 — BUY AMERICAN -

SUPPLIES

Parent topic: Part 5325 - Foreign Acquisition

5325.103 Exceptions

(a)(ii)(B)(1) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.

(a)(ii)(B)(2) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.

(a)(ii)(B)(3) See MP5301.601(a)(i) for public interest exception approvals.

(b)(ii)(A) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103

and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.

(b)(ii)(B) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103

and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.

(b)(ii)(C) Follow MP5325.103 when a determination of non-availability is required by FAR 25.103

and DFARS 225.103. See MP5301.601(a)(i) for nonavailability determination approvals.
Addendum No. 1 to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 Addendum No. 1 to Employment Agreement 
  
 This Addendum No. 1 is entered into this 4 day of January, 2006 and shall serve to amend that Employment Agreement
entered into by and between Impac Funding Corporation (“Employer”) and Gretchen Verdugo (“Employee”) with an effective date of February 1, 2005, hereinafter the “Agreement.” 
  
 The parties hereto agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

  

	 	1.	Paragraph 2.8 shall be stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

  

	 	2.8	The Employee may elect Voluntary Termination 30 days prior to May 31, 2006. If Employee wishes to elect Voluntary Termination, Employee must give at least 30, but no more than 60
days notice, prior to May 31, 2006. Voluntary termination is only available upon proper notice. 

  
 In all other regards the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
  

									
					
	 	 	/s/    GRETCHEN VERDUGO        	 	 	 	 	 	/s/    RICHARD J.
JOHNSON        
	 	 	Gretchen Verdugo	 	 	 	 	 	Impac Funding Corporation

  

									
					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	Richard J. Johnson
				
	 	 	 1/4/06
	 	 	 	 1/3/06

	 	 	Date	 	 	 	Date
Approval 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

FULL WRITTEN EXPLANATION 

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to close the following meeting: 

Friday. November4.2015 

10:00 a.m. 

Attendance 

Discussion of Security Issues (Closed Ex. 1) 

The Commission voted 3 to O on September 20, 2016, to close this briefing 

which is reasonably expected to involve classified information. 

Commissioners and members of their staff 

Executive Director for Operations and members of his staff 

Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response and members of his staff 

Representatives of Commission Staff Offices 

Contact Person for More Information 

Glenn Ellmers, Office of the Secretary (301-415-0442) 

Glenn Ellmers 

Office of the Secretary 

10!/( /2016
### §15008. Construction

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to preclude an entity funded under this subchapter from engaging in advocacy, capacity building, and systemic change activities for individuals with developmental disabilities that may also have a positive impact on individuals with other disabilities.

(Pub. L. 106–402, title I, §108, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1692.)
### §14913. Responsibilities of the Attorney General

In addition to such other responsibilities as are specifically conferred upon the Attorney General by this chapter, the central authority functions specified in Article 14 of the Convention (relating to the filing of applications by prospective adoptive parents to the central authority of their country of residence) shall be performed by the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 106–279, title I, §103, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 829.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–279, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 825, known as the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 14901 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 6, 2000, with transition rule, see section 505(a)(1), (b) of Pub. L. 106–279, set out as an Effective Dates; Transition Rule note under section 14901 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6686

WILLIAM FRANKLIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BOBBY SHEARIN; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director; CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-70-JFM) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 7, 2002 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Franklin appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and on his motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Franklin v. Shearin , No. CA-02-70-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 29 & Apr. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §16422. Advanced transmission technologies

#### (a) Definition of advanced transmission technology

In this section, the term "advanced transmission technology" means a technology that increases the capacity, efficiency, or reliability of an existing or new transmission facility, including—

(1) high-temperature lines (including superconducting cables);

(2) underground cables;

(3) advanced conductor technology (including advanced composite conductors, high-temperature low-sag conductors, and fiber optic temperature sensing conductors);

(4) high-capacity ceramic electric wire, connectors, and insulators;

(5) optimized transmission line configurations (including multiple phased transmission lines);

(6) modular equipment;

(7) wireless power transmission;

(8) ultra-high voltage lines;

(9) high-voltage DC technology;

(10) flexible AC transmission systems;

(11) energy storage devices (including pumped hydro, compressed air, superconducting magnetic energy storage, flywheels, and batteries);

(12) controllable load;

(13) distributed generation (including PV, fuel cells, and microturbines);

(14) enhanced power device monitoring;

(15) direct system state sensors;

(16) fiber optic technologies;

(17) power electronics and related software (including real time monitoring and analytical software);

(18) mobile transformers and mobile substations; and

(19) any other technologies the Commission considers appropriate.

#### (b) Authority

In carrying out the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.) and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.), the Commission shall encourage, as appropriate, the deployment of advanced transmission technologies.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1223, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 953.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Power Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, which is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791a et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of Title 16 and Tables.

The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 95–617, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3117. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of Title 16, Conservation, and Tables.