alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §10824. Reports by Secretary

(a) The Secretary shall include in each report required under section 15005 of this title a separate statement which contains—

(1) a description of the activities, accomplishments, and expenditures of systems to protect and advocate the rights of individuals with mental illness supported with payments from allotments under this subchapter, including—

(A) a specification of the total number of individuals with mental illness served by such systems;

(B) a description of the types of activities undertaken by such systems;

(C) a description of the types of facilities providing care or treatment with respect to which such activities are undertaken;

(D) a description of the manner in which such activities are initiated; and

(E) a description of the accomplishments resulting from such activities;

(2) a description of—

(A) systems to protect and advocate the rights of individuals with mental illness supported with payments from allotments under this subchapter;

(B) activities conducted by States to protect and advocate such rights;

(C) mechanisms established by residential facilities for individuals with mental illness to protect and advocate such rights; and

(D) the coordination among such systems, activities, and mechanisms;

(3) a specification of the number of systems established with allotments under this subchapter and of whether each such system was established by a public or nonprofit private entity;

(4) recommendations for activities and services to improve the protection and advocacy of the rights of individuals with mental illness and a description of needs for such activities and services which have not been met by systems established under this subchapter; and

(5) using data from the existing required annual program progress reports submitted by each system funded under this subchapter, a detailed accounting for each such system of how funds are spent, disaggregated according to whether the funds were received from the Federal Government, the State government, a local government, or a private entity.

(b) In preparing each statement required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall use and include information submitted to the Secretary in the reports required under section 10805(a)(7) of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–319, title I, §114, May 23, 1986, 100 Stat. 484; Pub. L. 102–173, §10(2), Nov. 27, 1991, 105 Stat. 1219; Pub. L. 106–402, title IV, §401(b)(13)(B), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1739; Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title VI, §6022(b), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 114–255 added par. (5).

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–402 substituted "section 15005 of this title" for "section 6006(c) of this title" in introductory provisions.

1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–173 substituted "individuals with mental illness" for "mentally ill individuals" wherever appearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3826 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3826

    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced 
            interest rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2012

  Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. Peters, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. 
   Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Stark, Mr. Clarke of 
Michigan, Mr. Grijalva, and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced 
            interest rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking ``and 
        before July 1, 2012,''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``and before July 1, 
        2012,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 19, 2008 /s/ Jose Acevedo, President
§ 303.19 Name or other identification required to appear on labels. ( a ) The name required by the Act to be used on labels shall be the name under which the person is doing business. Where a person has a word trademark, used as a house mark, registered in the United States Patent Office, such word trademark may be used on labels in lieu of the name otherwise required. No trademark, trade names, or other names except those provided for above shall be used for required identification purposes.
( b ) Registered identification numbers, as provided for in § 303.20 of this part, may be used for identification purposes in lieu of the required name.
[24 FR 4480, June 2, 1959, as amended at 83 FR 3071, Jan. 23, 2018]
No. 15-090 December 22, 2015

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Supplement to Environmental Study of 

Indian Point Nuclear Plant License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a draft supplement to the 

environmental impact statement on the proposed license renewal of the Indian Point nuclear power 

plant in Buchanan, N.Y.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 are two pressurized-water reactors located 

about 24 miles north of New York City. Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. submitted its license renewal 

application in April 2007, and the NRC staff issued its final environmental impact statement in 

December 2010.

This is the second supplement to the Indian Point environmental impact statement. It 

incorporates information obtained by the NRC staff since the first supplement was published in June 

2013. The supplement includes the staff’s evaluation of revised cost estimates for severe accident 

mitigation alternatives, new information on the plant’s impact on aquatic life in the Hudson River, and 

other environmental issues. It also incorporates findings of the NRC’s Generic Environmental Impact 

Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, published in September 2014. Finally, the 

supplement describes new consultations under the Endangered Species Act regarding the northern longeared bat and provides an update on the status of the operating licenses of Indian Point units 2 and 3.

Comments may be submitted over the federal government’s rulemaking website, 

www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC-2008-0672. They may also be submitted by mail to Cindy 

Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555-0001. The comment period will begin upon publication of a Federal Register

notice by the Environmental Protection Agency, expected in early January, and will end March 4.

The draft supplement is Volume 5 of Supplement 38 to the Generic Environmental Impact 

Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. It and other documents related to the Indian Point 

license renewal are available on the NRC website.
#### § 5.52 Nonpublic proceedings.

Any investigation or proceedings held under this part shall be nonpublic unless the respondent specifically requests otherwise, except to the extent required by the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) or by the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b). However, the presiding official's initial decision and any final decision of the Commission shall be placed on the public record, except that information may be designated *in camera* in accordance with § 3.45 of the Commission's Rules of Practice.
**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09-8178**

In Re: KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR, Appellant.

----------------------------- CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WASHINGTON, Petitioner,

v. WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk . Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:09-cv-00560-HCM-TEM)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Edward Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Barbour, a three

- striker under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006), who filed a

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition on behalf of a fellow prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order providing him with notice that signing pleadings on behalf of another may be considered the unlicensed practice of law , and advising the fellow prisoner that if he desires to file a § 2254 petition he must do so personally or through counsel and sign the petition under penalty of perjury. This court may exercise jur isdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Barbour seeks to appeal is

ne ither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis , deny Barbour’s motion to expedite a decision in this appeal , and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT J UNE 12 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 05- 1459 0

D. C. Dock et No. 0 4- 00 18 6 C V-T-2 6EAJ ALL CHILDREN’ S HOSPITAL, INC., W EST COAST NEONA TOLOGY, INC., et a l., Pl ai nti ff s- A ppe lla nts ,

ve rs us MEDICAL SAVINGS INSURANC E COMPANY, De fendant-Appellee.

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D ist ri ct

of F lor ida (J un e 12, 200 6) Be fo re D U BI N A , K RA V IT CH a nd J O H N R. G IB SO N *, Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:

_________________________ *Honora ble J ohn R. Gibson, United States Circuit J udg e for the Eig hth Circuit, sit ting by desig nation.2

Pl ai nti ff s/a ppe llants , A ll Ch ildre n’ s H ospi ta l, I nc . a nd W es t C oa st N eo na tol ogy , I nc . , appe al the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t t o Me dic al S av ing s I nsur an ce Co

. ( “ ins ur an ce c om pa ny ”) , on p la int if

fs ’ c la im s f

or br ea ch of c ont ra ct a nd d ec la ra tor

y j udgm en t. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, r ea din g th e pa rt ie s’ br ie fs a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t i n fa vor of the ins ur an ce c om

pa ny f or the r ea sons giv en in the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s w el lre as one d or de r fi le d on A ugus t 3, 200 5. AFFIRMED.
Aggregate Risk and Hazard QuotientResults Surtace Impoundment PetitionedWaste Aggreagate Non-carcinogenic Hazard PetitionedWasteAggregate Carcinogenic Risk Surface Groundwater Pathway Total Groundwater Surface Pathway Aggregate Aggregate Pathway Pathway Total Aggregate Hazard Hazard Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Chemical Name Hazard Quotient Quotient Quotient Risk CancerRisk Risk Acetone (2-propanone) 7.64E-07 2.30E-09 7.66E-07 Antimony 8.59E-04 8.59E-04 Arsenic 4.96E-03 4.96E-03 1.62E-06 l.62E-06 Barium l.68E-04 1.68E-04 Benzene 4.47E-06 3.53E-09 4.47E-06 5.53E-1O 4.08E-13 5.53E-iO Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8.13E-09 1 .04E-10 8.23E-09 Benzoic acid 1 .83E-06 2.38E-10 1 .83E-06 Beryllium 8.58E-11 8.58E-11 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 3.77E-33 3.21E-09 3.21E-09 2.57E-37 4.48E-13 4.48E-13 Cadmium 1 .63E-02 Carbon disulfide 4.89E-07 4.06E-1O 4.89E-07 Carbontetrachloride 5.50E-05 5.50E-05 3.97E-09 3.14E-12 3.97E-09 Chloroform 5.74E-06 4.24E-09 5.74E-06 2.79E-09 4.85E-12 2.79E-09 Chromium 2.49E-03 2.49E-03 Cobalt I.30E-03 1 .30E-03 Copper 2.12E-02 2.12E-02 Cresol m- 1 .74E-04 1 .74E-04 Cyanide I.96E-05 1 .96E-05 Dichloroethane 1,2- 1.72E-06 i.75E-10 1.72E-06 3.96E-09 5.56E-12 3.97E-09 Dichloroethylene 1,1- 2.05E-06 2.11E-09 2.05E-06 Dichloroethylene cis-1 ,2- 2.55E-06 2.55E-06 Diethyl phthalate 7.40E-06 7.40E-06 Diphenylamine 5.08E-04 6.70E-08 5.08E-04 Fluoranthene 2.14E-04 2.17E-07 2.14E-04 Fluoride 1 .49E-02 1 .49E-02 Hexanone 2- 2.43E-07 3.1OE-10 2.43E-07 Lead Mercury (Fish Pathway Only) Mercury (Total) 3.35E-02 1.19E-04 3.36E-02 Methyl ethyl ketone 1 .59E-07 2.14E-10 1 .59E-07 Methylnaphthalene 1- 1.67E-03 1.67E-03 8.81E-08 8.81E-08 Methylnapthalene2- 2.81 E-03 2.81 E-03 Nickel 2.78E-03 2.78E-03 Nitroaniline4- 2.60E-03 3.33E-06 2.60E-03 9.54E-08 3.48E-1 1 9.54E-08 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors) 1 .29E-05 2.38E-04 2.51 E-04

. 9.81 F-il I .36F-09 1 .46F-09 Pyrene 2.28F-05 2.28E-05 Selenium 5.31 E-05 5.31 E-05Silver 1.96E-02 1.96E-02 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) 2,3,7,8- 7.86E-10 6.78E-10 1 .46E-09 Tetrachloroethylene 1.14E-04 1.30E-07 1.14E-04 1.34E-07 1.36E-11 1.34E-07 Thallium 5.42E-03 5.42E-03 Tin 1.17E-06 1.17E-06 Trichloroethane 1,1,1

- 2.06E-09 8.39E-1 1 2.14E-09 Trichloroethylene(Trichloroethylene 1,1,2-) 1.59E-02 4.16E-08 1.59E-02 3.65E-08 2.48E-11 3.65E-08 Trichlorofluoromethane(Freon 11) 1 .32E-06 2.1OE-09 1 .32E-06 Trimethylbenzene 1,2,4 2.78E-05 6.83E-08 2.79E-05 Vanadium 4.43E-04 4.43E-04 Xylenes (total) I .88E-06 4.09E-09 I.88E-06 Zinc 8.39E-05 8.39E-05

All Constituents Excluding Non-Detects 1.15E-01 3.58E-04 1.15E-01 1 .99E-06 2.1BE-09 2.OOE-06

All Constituents Including Non-Detects 1.31E-O1 3.59E-04 1.32E-01 1.99E-06 2.21 E-09 2.OOE-06

Hazard and Riskshaded inyellowwere calculated using detection levels
#### Jeanette Rizzo, Appellant, v Harold P. Goldberg et al., Respondents.

[821 NYS2d 544]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hitor Group, a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10 Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report ) I Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Ken Martin_______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  May 20, 2013
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Yami Tarsi, certify
that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ACRO
Inc.2.Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact oromit to date a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuers other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuers other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuers internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting.

Date: May 17, 2006

Signature: /s/ Yami TarsiTitle: Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Francis Moynihan, Respondent, against William Turner Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which granted claimant compensation for reduced earnings on the basis of a 50% partial disability. Claimant was injured in an industrial accident on August 8, 1950, and was paid full compensation until February, 1951. On February 26, 1951, claimant started his own plumbing and heating business. There is testimony in the record that he performed only supervisory duties. Claimant had no actual earnings, and the board has properly determined upon the basis of medical proof that his earning capacity was 50%. Subdivision 5-a of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law authorizes such procedure. The record does not disclose that appellants were improperly foreclosed from offering any relevant proof. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Little Sioux Corn Processors,L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gary Grotjohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                  /s/  Gary Grotjohn |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Gary Grotjohn                                                                                                            |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*                                                                                                |
|   | * *                                                                                                                 |
|   | Dated: August 19, 2008                                                                                              |

 

----
#### § 453.6 Retention of documents.

To prevent the unfair or deceptive acts or practices specified in §§ 453.2 and 453.3 of this rule, funeral providers must retain and make available for inspection by Commission officials true and accurate copies of the price lists specified in §§ 453.2(b) (2) through (4), as applicable, for at least one year after the date of their last distribution to customers, and a copy of each statement of funeral goods and services selected, as required by § 453.2(b)(5), for at least one year from the date of the arrangements conference.
No: 16-052 August 31, 2016

Contact: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Comment on Proposed Changes to Public Meeting Policy

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is gathering comments on proposed revisions to the 

agency’s policy on enhancing participation in public meetings. 

The proposed revisions aim to improve NRC public meeting consistency and help participants 

in meeting preparation. The revised policy would categorize public meetings as:

• Observation Meeting – The NRC meets with representatives from one or more groups 

in an open and transparent manner to discuss regulatory and technical matters. The 

meeting helps the public understand the applicable regulatory issues and NRC actions.

• Information Meeting with a Question and Answer Session – The NRC shares 

information and discusses applicable regulatory issues and NRC actions. These are 

organized, yet informal opportunities for the public to interact with and ask questions of 

the NRC staff.

• Comment-Gathering Meeting – The NRC obtains feedback on regulatory issues and 

NRC actions. The meeting will usually include an NRC presentation to explain the issue. 

The feedback received at these meetings supports actions such as licensing and 

rulemaking activities.

The proposed revised policy continues the NRC’s goal of providing at least 10 days’ advance 

notice for public meetings. The proposed revisions support teleconferencing and other technologies to 

help ensure widespread meeting participation. The revisions also clarify the types of meetings covered 

by other policies (such as legal proceedings) or otherwise exempted from public participation 

requirements. 

In a related Federal Register notice published today, the NRC provided detailed instructions on 

how to submit written comments on the proposed revisions. Comments will be accepted through 

Nov. 14. For more information please contact Lance Rakovan at 301-415-2589 or 

lance.rakovan@nrc.gov.